WEBVTT - Avoiding the 'Middle Class Trap' w/ Scott Trench #1148

0:00:00.160 --> 0:00:03.080
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to How to Money. I'm Joel, and today I'm

0:00:03.080 --> 0:00:25.040
<v Speaker 1>talking about avoiding the middle class trap with Scott Trench. Okay,

0:00:25.079 --> 0:00:28.600
<v Speaker 1>so in the song rock in the Suburbs ben Folds,

0:00:28.600 --> 0:00:32.640
<v Speaker 1>he pokes fun at the struggles of middle class life, angsty,

0:00:32.720 --> 0:00:35.720
<v Speaker 1>a little whiny, but also tongue in cheek. It's killer

0:00:35.800 --> 0:00:38.440
<v Speaker 1>piano rock that makes you laugh because deep down it's

0:00:38.600 --> 0:00:42.560
<v Speaker 1>a little too relatable and that tension it's still alive today.

0:00:42.800 --> 0:00:45.120
<v Speaker 1>A lot of Americans and plenty of How to Money

0:00:45.120 --> 0:00:47.720
<v Speaker 1>listeners feel like they're doing all the right things. They're

0:00:47.760 --> 0:00:51.239
<v Speaker 1>saving diligently, they're investing wisely, but at the cost of

0:00:51.440 --> 0:00:54.560
<v Speaker 1>flexibility and maybe even some joy right now. So, how

0:00:54.600 --> 0:00:57.360
<v Speaker 1>do you balance building wealth through the future without squeezing

0:00:57.440 --> 0:00:59.959
<v Speaker 1>the life out of the present. That's what we're dying

0:01:00.120 --> 0:01:03.080
<v Speaker 1>being into today with Scott Trench. He literally wrote the

0:01:03.080 --> 0:01:06.240
<v Speaker 1>book on this set for life. He's helped thousands of

0:01:06.319 --> 0:01:08.120
<v Speaker 1>people and I think the book has sold more than

0:01:08.160 --> 0:01:11.280
<v Speaker 1>one hundred thousand copies chart their path the financial independence.

0:01:11.280 --> 0:01:13.319
<v Speaker 1>So Scott, thank you for taking the time to join

0:01:13.319 --> 0:01:13.679
<v Speaker 1>me today.

0:01:13.720 --> 0:01:16.000
<v Speaker 2>My friend Joel, thank you for the very very kind

0:01:16.040 --> 0:01:17.600
<v Speaker 2>intro your legend.

0:01:17.680 --> 0:01:20.320
<v Speaker 1>Scott trench. You've been in this space, you're still pretty young.

0:01:20.319 --> 0:01:21.920
<v Speaker 1>We're still went in the space for a long time,

0:01:22.160 --> 0:01:23.360
<v Speaker 1>and you've helped a lot of people. You've done a

0:01:23.400 --> 0:01:25.920
<v Speaker 1>lot of great work. So I'm thrilled to have you here.

0:01:26.200 --> 0:01:28.600
<v Speaker 1>First question I ask everybody who comes on, though, is

0:01:28.640 --> 0:01:30.200
<v Speaker 1>what do you like to splurge on? What's your craft

0:01:30.240 --> 0:01:30.880
<v Speaker 1>beer equivalent?

0:01:31.160 --> 0:01:33.080
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so this is this is a pretty embarrassing one

0:01:33.120 --> 0:01:35.880
<v Speaker 2>for somebody who runs a podcast in personal financial responsibility,

0:01:35.920 --> 0:01:40.039
<v Speaker 2>but have a I recently came purchased a golf cart

0:01:40.240 --> 0:01:42.520
<v Speaker 2>which I used to get around the neighborhood and take

0:01:42.560 --> 0:01:45.280
<v Speaker 2>my two little kids to the local park. I will

0:01:45.360 --> 0:01:47.840
<v Speaker 2>use it to take them to school when they start

0:01:47.880 --> 0:01:50.560
<v Speaker 2>attending school, and to the local pool. So that's my

0:01:51.520 --> 0:01:54.360
<v Speaker 2>very big splurge. You know, seven rate grand somewhere in

0:01:54.360 --> 0:01:54.680
<v Speaker 2>that range.

0:01:54.760 --> 0:01:57.120
<v Speaker 1>Oh wow, Okay, it is a fancy golf cart.

0:01:57.200 --> 0:01:59.840
<v Speaker 2>A nice little toy. Yeah that I got to take

0:01:59.840 --> 0:02:00.840
<v Speaker 2>a the neighborhood here.

0:02:00.920 --> 0:02:02.960
<v Speaker 1>Okay, is, so did you buy a brain new? Are

0:02:02.960 --> 0:02:04.040
<v Speaker 1>you buying used on?

0:02:04.280 --> 0:02:06.520
<v Speaker 2>I have bought it used, I should have bought it used,

0:02:06.560 --> 0:02:07.960
<v Speaker 2>but I got it. I got it. I got a

0:02:08.000 --> 0:02:10.720
<v Speaker 2>new one because the company that was selling them, was

0:02:10.760 --> 0:02:13.120
<v Speaker 2>going out of business, so okay, I picked up a

0:02:13.120 --> 0:02:13.639
<v Speaker 2>new one. There.

0:02:13.720 --> 0:02:15.480
<v Speaker 1>I feel like golf carts are all the rage in

0:02:15.520 --> 0:02:17.320
<v Speaker 1>the burbs these days. Is that Is that true?

0:02:17.400 --> 0:02:19.720
<v Speaker 2>You? Is that's it? Yes? I just completely jumped on this,

0:02:19.919 --> 0:02:23.280
<v Speaker 2>like tear you know, very basic trend. And I've really,

0:02:23.360 --> 0:02:25.440
<v Speaker 2>I really enjoyed taking my golf cart to the little

0:02:25.440 --> 0:02:28.040
<v Speaker 2>local coffee shop, yeah, or to the pool.

0:02:28.120 --> 0:02:31.160
<v Speaker 1>See. For me, this was electric bikes, and so I

0:02:31.200 --> 0:02:34.560
<v Speaker 1>have like a rad wagon that I still ride with

0:02:34.720 --> 0:02:36.960
<v Speaker 1>my youngest. My oldest too, they're on their own bikes

0:02:36.960 --> 0:02:38.639
<v Speaker 1>now and they don't wanna, they don't want to ride

0:02:38.680 --> 0:02:41.359
<v Speaker 1>with me anymore. But I have so many fond memories

0:02:41.400 --> 0:02:43.239
<v Speaker 1>and so many great pictures of like sticking them on

0:02:43.280 --> 0:02:45.919
<v Speaker 1>the back of the bike and going wherever around town

0:02:46.000 --> 0:02:47.960
<v Speaker 1>that we wanted to go. So that was my version

0:02:48.000 --> 0:02:50.079
<v Speaker 1>of the golf cart. And I will say, well worth

0:02:50.120 --> 0:02:52.440
<v Speaker 1>the money, You're gonna get a lot of joy out

0:02:52.440 --> 0:02:55.040
<v Speaker 1>of it. Okay, let's let's get onto it. Man. What

0:02:55.200 --> 0:02:58.040
<v Speaker 1>got you interested in the idea of early retirement to

0:02:58.040 --> 0:03:00.440
<v Speaker 1>begin with? Was it the fact that you were working

0:03:00.520 --> 0:03:03.359
<v Speaker 1>at one of America's worst companies and you just had

0:03:03.360 --> 0:03:03.799
<v Speaker 1>to get out.

0:03:04.000 --> 0:03:07.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so that I actually what happened was I got

0:03:08.720 --> 0:03:12.640
<v Speaker 2>before I graduated college, I had an internship at Dish Network,

0:03:12.680 --> 0:03:15.520
<v Speaker 2>which at that year was ranked the worst company to

0:03:15.520 --> 0:03:18.200
<v Speaker 2>work for in America. And I actually really enjoyed the internship.

0:03:18.200 --> 0:03:20.040
<v Speaker 2>They put out a great show. It was a wonderful time.

0:03:20.080 --> 0:03:22.679
<v Speaker 2>I have lifelong friends from that that summer between my

0:03:22.720 --> 0:03:24.239
<v Speaker 2>junior and senior year of college, and then when I

0:03:24.280 --> 0:03:26.600
<v Speaker 2>started in the real world. That's what I began to

0:03:26.680 --> 0:03:29.120
<v Speaker 2>kind of get disillusioned with the idea of climbing the

0:03:29.120 --> 0:03:31.480
<v Speaker 2>corporate ladder when I started the full time job at

0:03:31.520 --> 0:03:34.440
<v Speaker 2>Dish the next year after I moved to Colorado, and

0:03:34.480 --> 0:03:35.600
<v Speaker 2>I was like, you know, I'm going to badge in

0:03:35.600 --> 0:03:37.400
<v Speaker 2>a bitch, badge out for forty years if I do

0:03:37.480 --> 0:03:39.280
<v Speaker 2>this well, and I'll be one day climbing the ranks,

0:03:39.280 --> 0:03:41.080
<v Speaker 2>and I'll make good money if I climbed the ranks.

0:03:41.080 --> 0:03:43.200
<v Speaker 2>But I'll have that office over there instead of this one,

0:03:43.760 --> 0:03:44.920
<v Speaker 2>this cubicle right here.

0:03:44.880 --> 0:03:46.760
<v Speaker 1>The slightly bigger one with a slightly better view.

0:03:46.880 --> 0:03:48.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, And that was that was kind of the That

0:03:48.840 --> 0:03:51.000
<v Speaker 2>was that was wearing on me day to day early

0:03:51.040 --> 0:03:53.320
<v Speaker 2>on in the career, and I was fortunate to have

0:03:53.440 --> 0:03:57.760
<v Speaker 2>immediately stumbled across the foundational stuff in the financial independence world,

0:03:57.760 --> 0:04:01.960
<v Speaker 2>like mister money Mustache, the mad Fientists, early retirement, extreme

0:04:02.080 --> 0:04:05.960
<v Speaker 2>those kinds of things there, and having a working in

0:04:06.000 --> 0:04:08.480
<v Speaker 2>finance and having a background in economics and all those

0:04:08.560 --> 0:04:11.960
<v Speaker 2>kinds of things at school that really helped me. I

0:04:12.000 --> 0:04:14.040
<v Speaker 2>resonated with that, and I could model out, Oh, if

0:04:14.040 --> 0:04:17.040
<v Speaker 2>I just keep my expenses very low, I'll automatically become wealthy.

0:04:17.120 --> 0:04:19.840
<v Speaker 2>And the best way to keep my expenses very low

0:04:20.160 --> 0:04:22.719
<v Speaker 2>is to attack this huge line light them into my budget,

0:04:22.720 --> 0:04:25.720
<v Speaker 2>which is housing. And so I got a roommate, live

0:04:25.760 --> 0:04:28.039
<v Speaker 2>with a roommate, then began house hacking. You know. I

0:04:28.080 --> 0:04:31.640
<v Speaker 2>bought a couple of small, multi family properties, moved into them,

0:04:32.000 --> 0:04:35.200
<v Speaker 2>rented them out, used owner occupied occupied financing, and did

0:04:35.200 --> 0:04:37.000
<v Speaker 2>that off and on for ten years, the better part

0:04:37.000 --> 0:04:39.040
<v Speaker 2>of ten years. In a midpoint, like around year six

0:04:39.120 --> 0:04:42.320
<v Speaker 2>or seven, my now wife and I moved into an apartment,

0:04:43.200 --> 0:04:45.119
<v Speaker 2>got married in that apartment, and then moved back into

0:04:45.160 --> 0:04:47.200
<v Speaker 2>one of our rental properties for a year with our

0:04:47.240 --> 0:04:50.680
<v Speaker 2>little one before eventually getting our forever home here with

0:04:50.760 --> 0:04:51.400
<v Speaker 2>the golf cart.

0:04:51.440 --> 0:04:54.440
<v Speaker 1>So you were kind of tackling both and right you

0:04:54.480 --> 0:04:56.520
<v Speaker 1>were saying, listen, we got to dial back on spending,

0:04:56.520 --> 0:04:57.880
<v Speaker 1>we got to be more frugal, and then we got

0:04:57.880 --> 0:05:01.599
<v Speaker 1>to thrust that money into income using assets. So fierce

0:05:01.600 --> 0:05:03.800
<v Speaker 1>frugality was a part of your journey. And at one

0:05:03.800 --> 0:05:06.000
<v Speaker 1>point I think I heard you talk about enduring a

0:05:06.040 --> 0:05:08.320
<v Speaker 1>really cold winter with with no heat. Is that like,

0:05:08.360 --> 0:05:10.920
<v Speaker 1>how how far did you go from a frugality perspective?

0:05:10.960 --> 0:05:12.640
<v Speaker 2>Well, thanks for looking all this up yet, my my,

0:05:13.040 --> 0:05:15.520
<v Speaker 2>what happened was I bought this place and uh, it

0:05:15.560 --> 0:05:17.200
<v Speaker 2>was like April or something like that, and I was like,

0:05:17.320 --> 0:05:20.240
<v Speaker 2>I can go until fall before I install heating my

0:05:20.279 --> 0:05:23.120
<v Speaker 2>portion of the unit here. You know, I'm get by

0:05:23.160 --> 0:05:25.839
<v Speaker 2>with this stuff. And then my my then my now

0:05:25.880 --> 0:05:28.320
<v Speaker 2>wife moved, you know, started dating me around that time,

0:05:28.360 --> 0:05:32.520
<v Speaker 2>and we, uh we eventually started contemplating moving in together.

0:05:32.560 --> 0:05:34.839
<v Speaker 2>And that that only lasted a few weeks. Uh that

0:05:34.839 --> 0:05:36.720
<v Speaker 2>that low heat there was there wasn't like.

0:05:36.640 --> 0:05:39.159
<v Speaker 1>I'm not moving in there unless you get that heater repair.

0:05:39.400 --> 0:05:43.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. I will also say that frugality was you know,

0:05:43.960 --> 0:05:46.159
<v Speaker 2>there's a there's a in the world of personal finance.

0:05:46.200 --> 0:05:51.320
<v Speaker 2>I think frugality is sometimes a virtue and to a

0:05:51.320 --> 0:05:53.600
<v Speaker 2>lot of people. And I think that's a mistake, right,

0:05:53.600 --> 0:05:56.520
<v Speaker 2>because I never saw frugality as this virtue, right. I

0:05:56.560 --> 0:05:58.719
<v Speaker 2>saw it as there is there is something to it,

0:05:58.760 --> 0:06:00.479
<v Speaker 2>there is something wonder you know, I good about it,

0:06:00.480 --> 0:06:02.760
<v Speaker 2>and there's pride to be had in living living frugally there.

0:06:03.160 --> 0:06:05.279
<v Speaker 2>But it was the tool that was right for the

0:06:05.400 --> 0:06:09.320
<v Speaker 2>job in those early years, because I was already maximizing

0:06:09.320 --> 0:06:13.000
<v Speaker 2>my income. I was already investing according to way reasonably

0:06:13.000 --> 0:06:15.720
<v Speaker 2>well disciplined approach of cerial house hacking and then putting

0:06:15.760 --> 0:06:18.560
<v Speaker 2>everything else in S and P five hundred index funds, right,

0:06:18.640 --> 0:06:21.520
<v Speaker 2>you know, according to a tax advantaged retirement stack. So

0:06:21.680 --> 0:06:24.719
<v Speaker 2>there wasn't much more to be done on those funds

0:06:24.720 --> 0:06:28.840
<v Speaker 2>and those fronts, and so low spending was the main

0:06:28.960 --> 0:06:31.760
<v Speaker 2>driver of getting ahead financially for me at that point

0:06:31.760 --> 0:06:35.520
<v Speaker 2>in my life. It later transitioned to income generation or

0:06:35.600 --> 0:06:39.560
<v Speaker 2>leading bigger pockets, right, And at that point, being frugal

0:06:39.839 --> 0:06:42.720
<v Speaker 2>was a time and energy suck at that point, right,

0:06:42.800 --> 0:06:46.040
<v Speaker 2>Like if I'm gonna I'm going to pay somebody else

0:06:46.080 --> 0:06:48.320
<v Speaker 2>to mow my lawn, for example, at that point, because

0:06:48.320 --> 0:06:50.480
<v Speaker 2>that's going to take me away from this very high

0:06:50.560 --> 0:06:55.039
<v Speaker 2>paying job where I have a duty to customers, shareholders,

0:06:55.080 --> 0:06:57.960
<v Speaker 2>and those other folks. And so that's been an interesting evolution.

0:06:58.400 --> 0:07:02.159
<v Speaker 2>And now after stepping down, there's yet now, yet again,

0:07:02.400 --> 0:07:05.840
<v Speaker 2>a more emphasis on controlling my expense. I don't have

0:07:05.880 --> 0:07:08.000
<v Speaker 2>to be frugal the way I was at twenty three

0:07:08.040 --> 0:07:10.040
<v Speaker 2>or twenty four, but I have to be back in

0:07:10.080 --> 0:07:12.720
<v Speaker 2>control of those expenses in a way I didn't while

0:07:12.720 --> 0:07:14.840
<v Speaker 2>I was CEO. And I think that's an interesting takeaway

0:07:14.840 --> 0:07:16.840
<v Speaker 2>from this is there's a right tool for the job

0:07:16.880 --> 0:07:19.800
<v Speaker 2>at various moments along the journey, and the mistake is

0:07:19.880 --> 0:07:22.680
<v Speaker 2>using one the whole way through and not adapting or

0:07:22.680 --> 0:07:25.160
<v Speaker 2>evolving as your situation changes. What is the eighty twenty

0:07:25.160 --> 0:07:27.440
<v Speaker 2>of the situation as you move through your financial journey.

0:07:27.560 --> 0:07:29.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I'm sure you've seen the headlines of stories

0:07:29.920 --> 0:07:33.800
<v Speaker 1>about the janitor who dies and has eight million dollars

0:07:33.800 --> 0:07:37.240
<v Speaker 1>in his retirement accountant to some people might laud that

0:07:37.320 --> 0:07:40.240
<v Speaker 1>and say, incredible, right on a janitor's salary, that you

0:07:40.320 --> 0:07:42.160
<v Speaker 1>could a masked that much money, And I think of

0:07:42.200 --> 0:07:46.160
<v Speaker 1>it as like incredibly sad, right that someone would invest in,

0:07:46.240 --> 0:07:48.440
<v Speaker 1>say for that long, and never get to enjoy the

0:07:48.440 --> 0:07:50.960
<v Speaker 1>fruits of their labors. And you're right. I think that's

0:07:51.040 --> 0:07:56.080
<v Speaker 1>probably the hyper frugality focus gone wrong, and there's just

0:07:56.160 --> 0:07:58.400
<v Speaker 1>never an ability at least for that person to adjust,

0:07:58.400 --> 0:07:59.840
<v Speaker 1>and you have to make adjustments over time.

0:08:00.080 --> 0:08:02.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I view it. I view finance as almost like

0:08:02.240 --> 0:08:05.080
<v Speaker 2>an engineering problem. Right, here's exactly what I want my

0:08:05.200 --> 0:08:07.120
<v Speaker 2>day to look like, in my life to look like

0:08:07.240 --> 0:08:09.640
<v Speaker 2>in great detail. I can literally I literally have it

0:08:09.680 --> 0:08:11.840
<v Speaker 2>written down on a page and a half. With my wife,

0:08:11.880 --> 0:08:14.240
<v Speaker 2>we updated every quarter, and we did it in our honeymoon.

0:08:14.280 --> 0:08:16.440
<v Speaker 2>That's how mardy I am about this. But I literally

0:08:16.440 --> 0:08:18.760
<v Speaker 2>have that written down. We update it regularly, and we

0:08:19.080 --> 0:08:21.680
<v Speaker 2>engineer for that, and that question is how do we

0:08:21.680 --> 0:08:22.600
<v Speaker 2>do that most efficiently?

0:08:22.800 --> 0:08:26.280
<v Speaker 1>And I think that's what Scott Trench's ideal day look like.

0:08:26.320 --> 0:08:27.880
<v Speaker 2>All right, I pull it up here, you want to

0:08:28.040 --> 0:08:28.440
<v Speaker 2>pull it up?

0:08:28.640 --> 0:08:30.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I'm so curious to know. And I love this

0:08:30.920 --> 0:08:34.040
<v Speaker 1>because because you're right, like if if you have it

0:08:34.120 --> 0:08:36.520
<v Speaker 1>mapped out to that extent, my guess is, my guess

0:08:36.600 --> 0:08:39.840
<v Speaker 1>is before you start rattling things off that most of

0:08:39.880 --> 0:08:42.840
<v Speaker 1>the things that are on there are inexpensive or free.

0:08:43.559 --> 0:08:46.679
<v Speaker 2>No, not not necessarily, many of the things really are.

0:08:46.840 --> 0:08:49.920
<v Speaker 2>But I specifically, like I live in Colorado. I want

0:08:49.960 --> 0:08:52.400
<v Speaker 2>to see the mountains out of my house. I love that.

0:08:52.480 --> 0:08:54.760
<v Speaker 2>I love like the mountain sunset. And that was not

0:08:55.200 --> 0:08:58.640
<v Speaker 2>free or cheap, right, and that was a major investment.

0:08:58.960 --> 0:09:00.520
<v Speaker 2>But I will I will say that, yes, there's a

0:09:00.559 --> 0:09:02.360
<v Speaker 2>good chunk of that. So here, I'll pull this up.

0:09:02.600 --> 0:09:05.640
<v Speaker 2>So here's the latest evolution right of this vision. It's

0:09:05.760 --> 0:09:08.560
<v Speaker 2>not the most recent one. And they don't really move.

0:09:08.600 --> 0:09:10.199
<v Speaker 2>It doesn't really move that much anymore. It used to

0:09:10.240 --> 0:09:11.920
<v Speaker 2>move all the time. Wife and I would be like, Oh,

0:09:11.960 --> 0:09:14.480
<v Speaker 2>we want to live in Hawaii. We want to live here. No, No,

0:09:15.040 --> 0:09:16.800
<v Speaker 2>Now we've kind of settled in of this is what

0:09:16.840 --> 0:09:19.319
<v Speaker 2>we want. But our home is bustling with our two kids,

0:09:19.360 --> 0:09:22.600
<v Speaker 2>Katie and Taylor, and are very handsome Kitty Fred. We

0:09:22.679 --> 0:09:24.920
<v Speaker 2>have an energetic, healthy, day to day lifestyle with lots

0:09:24.920 --> 0:09:26.839
<v Speaker 2>of laughter and fun happening throughout the day. We put

0:09:26.840 --> 0:09:29.840
<v Speaker 2>each other first, demonstrated by both of us making an

0:09:29.840 --> 0:09:31.880
<v Speaker 2>effort every week to make the other person feel loved

0:09:31.880 --> 0:09:34.640
<v Speaker 2>and appreciated during the week. Our work commitments EBB and

0:09:34.679 --> 0:09:37.720
<v Speaker 2>flow according to our interests. We can be very flexible

0:09:37.760 --> 0:09:40.440
<v Speaker 2>and maintain high autonomy over the trajectory of our work days.

0:09:40.440 --> 0:09:42.400
<v Speaker 2>So we can work a ten or twelve hour shift

0:09:42.679 --> 0:09:45.920
<v Speaker 2>on important deep work, or take off for three days

0:09:45.960 --> 0:09:48.720
<v Speaker 2>in a row doing hike, ski and bike days. We

0:09:48.720 --> 0:09:51.880
<v Speaker 2>can also take relaxing recovery days anytime. Virginia writes best

0:09:51.920 --> 0:09:54.800
<v Speaker 2>selling books, and I continue my study of early retirement,

0:09:54.880 --> 0:09:57.360
<v Speaker 2>pioneering ideas to accelerate it or make it more enjoyable.

0:09:57.559 --> 0:10:00.040
<v Speaker 2>Here at Bigger Pockets Money, Taylor and Katie are I

0:10:00.120 --> 0:10:02.360
<v Speaker 2>enrolled in high quality full time daycare. We have several

0:10:02.360 --> 0:10:05.760
<v Speaker 2>wonderful babysitters. We take trips. We have a thriving local

0:10:05.840 --> 0:10:08.160
<v Speaker 2>community of friends. I'm paraphrasing here. I've got a whole

0:10:08.200 --> 0:10:10.520
<v Speaker 2>page and a half of this. We maintain high levels

0:10:10.520 --> 0:10:13.840
<v Speaker 2>of physical fitness. Here's our diet and exercise regimens. Here,

0:10:13.920 --> 0:10:16.720
<v Speaker 2>here's where Scott's competitive outlet is. You have your marathons.

0:10:16.800 --> 0:10:18.320
<v Speaker 2>I need to find that for me. That's like one

0:10:18.320 --> 0:10:19.640
<v Speaker 2>of my projects this year is like what do I

0:10:19.679 --> 0:10:22.679
<v Speaker 2>want to compete in? Certainly not running for four hours straight.

0:10:23.240 --> 0:10:25.160
<v Speaker 1>Or two hours, it is pretty psychotical.

0:10:26.240 --> 0:10:28.000
<v Speaker 2>And then our financial houses in order. We have our

0:10:28.000 --> 0:10:30.559
<v Speaker 2>paid off primary home, one year cash reserve, and a

0:10:30.600 --> 0:10:33.480
<v Speaker 2>conservative primary investment portfolio that generates one hundred and fifty

0:10:33.480 --> 0:10:35.760
<v Speaker 2>percent of our base living expenses. On top of that,

0:10:35.800 --> 0:10:38.480
<v Speaker 2>we have substantial financial upsides with various projects that we're

0:10:38.520 --> 0:10:41.840
<v Speaker 2>working on. And so that's it. And one particular point

0:10:41.840 --> 0:10:44.800
<v Speaker 2>in there that I skipped over here is we see

0:10:44.840 --> 0:10:47.880
<v Speaker 2>the mountains every day from our porch, like we broke

0:10:47.920 --> 0:10:50.400
<v Speaker 2>that down years ago before we bought our house and

0:10:50.480 --> 0:10:53.200
<v Speaker 2>get to watch a western facing sunset on most or

0:10:53.400 --> 0:10:56.080
<v Speaker 2>every evening. And that was really important to us, for example,

0:10:56.120 --> 0:10:58.040
<v Speaker 2>and was not a cheap item. That was something we

0:10:58.040 --> 0:11:02.880
<v Speaker 2>had to work for and income and investment dollars to realize.

0:11:03.320 --> 0:11:06.040
<v Speaker 1>Well, thanks for sharing that, and I know that's you've

0:11:06.040 --> 0:11:09.200
<v Speaker 1>actually posted that on your website of Bigger Pockets, and

0:11:09.240 --> 0:11:11.640
<v Speaker 1>so we'll look to that in the show notes. But

0:11:11.679 --> 0:11:16.920
<v Speaker 1>I think that's like the kind of intentional introspection that

0:11:17.000 --> 0:11:19.800
<v Speaker 1>most people don't do, and they don't get down to

0:11:20.080 --> 0:11:23.880
<v Speaker 1>the nitty gritty of something as simple as like I

0:11:24.000 --> 0:11:26.000
<v Speaker 1>want to be able to see the sunset every night

0:11:26.080 --> 0:11:30.040
<v Speaker 1>right from from my porch, and which then influences I

0:11:30.040 --> 0:11:34.560
<v Speaker 1>would imagine going back cascading. You know, different ways of

0:11:34.760 --> 0:11:38.240
<v Speaker 1>living and ways of saving and ways of investing to

0:11:38.280 --> 0:11:41.680
<v Speaker 1>help you pull that off. I'm curious too, Like you,

0:11:41.679 --> 0:11:43.800
<v Speaker 1>you mentioned bigger pockets in real estate, and I want

0:11:43.800 --> 0:11:45.800
<v Speaker 1>to talk to you about real estate. But index funds

0:11:45.880 --> 0:11:48.000
<v Speaker 1>or traditionally have been seen as like the gospel of

0:11:48.040 --> 0:11:52.080
<v Speaker 1>financial independence. Why did you believe that real estate investing

0:11:52.080 --> 0:11:54.400
<v Speaker 1>would be the best best path for you to achieve it?

0:11:54.559 --> 0:11:57.240
<v Speaker 2>So I think this is really funny because I agree

0:11:57.240 --> 0:11:59.560
<v Speaker 2>with the index fund approach. The reason I got into

0:11:59.559 --> 0:12:01.920
<v Speaker 2>real estate investing is because when I was following mister

0:12:01.960 --> 0:12:05.200
<v Speaker 2>money Mustache in twenty thirteen, I was like, how do

0:12:05.200 --> 0:12:07.160
<v Speaker 2>I become more frugal? And I was like, well, something's

0:12:07.160 --> 0:12:09.400
<v Speaker 2>missing here? What about housing? Like that's that's pretty big

0:12:09.440 --> 0:12:12.240
<v Speaker 2>expense and I want to eliminate that. And something on

0:12:12.320 --> 0:12:15.640
<v Speaker 2>bigger pockets. I think Brandon Turner wrote an article at

0:12:15.640 --> 0:12:17.840
<v Speaker 2>some point or another, one of the podcast hosts at

0:12:17.840 --> 0:12:20.600
<v Speaker 2>the time, and he wrote about house hacking and was like, Oh,

0:12:20.640 --> 0:12:22.560
<v Speaker 2>if you buy a multi unit property and then you

0:12:22.600 --> 0:12:25.200
<v Speaker 2>get a mortgage and then the other side pays that mortgage,

0:12:25.200 --> 0:12:27.040
<v Speaker 2>you can live for free or pretty close to it,

0:12:27.120 --> 0:12:32.520
<v Speaker 2>after reasonable approximations for your maintenance, vacancy, capex, utilities and

0:12:32.559 --> 0:12:34.800
<v Speaker 2>all that kind of good stuff. And so that seemed

0:12:34.840 --> 0:12:37.199
<v Speaker 2>like an obvious way to keep my expenses low. And

0:12:37.280 --> 0:12:40.240
<v Speaker 2>a byproduct of doing that, means of doing that well,

0:12:40.360 --> 0:12:42.199
<v Speaker 2>means that you have to spend the time to research

0:12:42.240 --> 0:12:44.040
<v Speaker 2>how to become a good real estate investor, because you're

0:12:44.040 --> 0:12:47.280
<v Speaker 2>buying a rental property, fundamentally, you're analyzing it for cash flow.

0:12:47.640 --> 0:12:50.320
<v Speaker 2>And so I put in the several hundred hours needed

0:12:50.320 --> 0:12:52.400
<v Speaker 2>to think about how to make a quality real estate

0:12:52.440 --> 0:12:55.240
<v Speaker 2>investment purchase, moved in, fixed it up, and then I

0:12:55.280 --> 0:12:56.839
<v Speaker 2>had the skill. I knew exactly what to do, and

0:12:56.880 --> 0:12:59.360
<v Speaker 2>I could just repeat it several times. And so over

0:12:59.440 --> 0:13:02.200
<v Speaker 2>ten years you become very good at real estate investing,

0:13:02.240 --> 0:13:04.240
<v Speaker 2>and I, of course I'm the CEO. I become the

0:13:04.240 --> 0:13:06.160
<v Speaker 2>CEO of Bigger Pockets during this time. So I had

0:13:06.160 --> 0:13:08.400
<v Speaker 2>lots of repetitions with a lot of real estate investors.

0:13:08.559 --> 0:13:10.280
<v Speaker 2>But I like to think that even if I never

0:13:10.360 --> 0:13:12.120
<v Speaker 2>went down that path and I had just gone down

0:13:12.160 --> 0:13:15.480
<v Speaker 2>some completely different career, if I had serial house hacked

0:13:15.520 --> 0:13:17.600
<v Speaker 2>like that, I would have acquired the skill of being

0:13:17.720 --> 0:13:21.800
<v Speaker 2>a competent landlord over that time period. Anyways, and there

0:13:21.840 --> 0:13:25.200
<v Speaker 2>are if you're willing to pay that price, real advantages

0:13:25.240 --> 0:13:27.120
<v Speaker 2>that you can get, especially in the early days of

0:13:27.120 --> 0:13:30.040
<v Speaker 2>a real estate investment when you're using leverage, which amplifies

0:13:30.080 --> 0:13:32.920
<v Speaker 2>returns and also risk. There are real returns that can

0:13:33.000 --> 0:13:35.640
<v Speaker 2>amplify that beyond what you can see in the in

0:13:35.679 --> 0:13:38.840
<v Speaker 2>a stock market portfolio. And then the other side of

0:13:38.840 --> 0:13:41.360
<v Speaker 2>that is as the years go by and your mortgage

0:13:41.360 --> 0:13:44.400
<v Speaker 2>cost stays. If we stay back, real estate at its

0:13:44.400 --> 0:13:47.760
<v Speaker 2>simplest form is a inflation adjusted store of value. Your

0:13:47.800 --> 0:13:51.600
<v Speaker 2>property is probably going to pace inflation over thirty years.

0:13:51.800 --> 0:13:53.960
<v Speaker 2>It's going to be ups and downs across that time,

0:13:54.000 --> 0:13:55.760
<v Speaker 2>but that's a reasonable bed. If you don't believe that,

0:13:55.760 --> 0:13:58.040
<v Speaker 2>you shouldn't buy real estate. The other thing is is

0:13:58.040 --> 0:14:02.160
<v Speaker 2>it's an inflation adjusted income stream. The rents minus the

0:14:02.200 --> 0:14:05.240
<v Speaker 2>expenses is going to compute to some amount of cash

0:14:05.240 --> 0:14:08.640
<v Speaker 2>flow each year, relatively tax advantage cash flow, and that

0:14:08.679 --> 0:14:11.560
<v Speaker 2>should also keep pace with inflation over very long periods

0:14:11.559 --> 0:14:14.400
<v Speaker 2>of time, and stretches like the last five years, that

0:14:14.400 --> 0:14:16.720
<v Speaker 2>can compress a little bit as rents don't grow much

0:14:16.880 --> 0:14:19.400
<v Speaker 2>and expenses do grow, but over long periods of time

0:14:19.400 --> 0:14:21.160
<v Speaker 2>you can believe it. And so once the property's paid

0:14:21.200 --> 0:14:23.080
<v Speaker 2>off or getting close to being paid off, you have

0:14:23.200 --> 0:14:26.960
<v Speaker 2>more cash flow, but diminishing returns because you're not getting

0:14:26.960 --> 0:14:29.800
<v Speaker 2>the amplification effect of the leverage to the same degree

0:14:29.840 --> 0:14:32.760
<v Speaker 2>at the beginning of it. And that's very appealing towards

0:14:32.760 --> 0:14:35.280
<v Speaker 2>the end of your financial journey because it makes the

0:14:35.320 --> 0:14:37.240
<v Speaker 2>math very simple. You can almost treat it like a

0:14:37.280 --> 0:14:40.200
<v Speaker 2>pension to some degree. If you're conservative with your assumptions,

0:14:40.240 --> 0:14:42.240
<v Speaker 2>you know there would be some volatility, some capecks and

0:14:42.240 --> 0:14:44.600
<v Speaker 2>those types of things, and adding that to your fire number.

0:14:44.680 --> 0:14:46.760
<v Speaker 2>So those are the reasons why I got into real estate.

0:14:46.920 --> 0:14:50.200
<v Speaker 2>But if I hadn't been for house hacking and bigger

0:14:50.240 --> 0:14:52.560
<v Speaker 2>pockets and I had some other very demanding career, I

0:14:52.640 --> 0:14:55.200
<v Speaker 2>may have just gone in with the index fund approach

0:14:55.240 --> 0:14:56.760
<v Speaker 2>the whole time. So I see real estate as a

0:14:56.800 --> 0:14:59.360
<v Speaker 2>tool that's very powerful for certain folks that want to

0:14:59.480 --> 0:15:01.360
<v Speaker 2>use that, that were willing to put in that education

0:15:01.920 --> 0:15:06.000
<v Speaker 2>and take that extra risk, and they can get different returns,

0:15:06.160 --> 0:15:08.680
<v Speaker 2>maybe better in the early days, maybe different styles of

0:15:08.680 --> 0:15:10.680
<v Speaker 2>cash flow that they'll feel more comfortable with at the

0:15:10.760 --> 0:15:13.360
<v Speaker 2>end of it. But it's not better than stocks. Different

0:15:13.360 --> 0:15:14.360
<v Speaker 2>it's just a different approach.

0:15:14.680 --> 0:15:17.680
<v Speaker 1>And I think house hacking in particular is like the

0:15:17.720 --> 0:15:20.600
<v Speaker 1>real estate investing strategy that kind of trumps everything else

0:15:20.840 --> 0:15:24.720
<v Speaker 1>because you can lower your housing costs significantly. There's you're

0:15:24.800 --> 0:15:26.800
<v Speaker 1>kind of when you're comparing investing in the S and P.

0:15:26.920 --> 0:15:29.040
<v Speaker 1>Five hundred to investing in a single family home or

0:15:29.040 --> 0:15:31.920
<v Speaker 1>a duplex. Yes, you're talking about, you know, the use

0:15:31.960 --> 0:15:33.840
<v Speaker 1>of leverage to be able to enhance that investment in

0:15:33.840 --> 0:15:35.880
<v Speaker 1>real estate. And then as the better you get as

0:15:35.920 --> 0:15:38.479
<v Speaker 1>a real estate investry, might be able to find significant

0:15:38.480 --> 0:15:42.280
<v Speaker 1>deals right and and you might be able to get

0:15:42.280 --> 0:15:45.480
<v Speaker 1>better returns overall because of leverage and because of your

0:15:46.440 --> 0:15:51.680
<v Speaker 1>knack for solid real estate investing. But there's just nothing

0:15:51.800 --> 0:15:55.320
<v Speaker 1>that compares to the financial return of house hacking, and

0:15:55.400 --> 0:15:58.280
<v Speaker 1>so few people I think are willing to engage it.

0:15:58.280 --> 0:15:59.880
<v Speaker 1>It's one of the things. Did you feel like you

0:16:00.200 --> 0:16:04.440
<v Speaker 1>giving something up to engage in that act? Were you like, man,

0:16:04.560 --> 0:16:07.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm really sluming it here for for six months, for

0:16:07.600 --> 0:16:10.880
<v Speaker 1>two years or whatever. Some people talk about house hacking

0:16:10.920 --> 0:16:13.480
<v Speaker 1>and it's just it sounds brutal, I guess to the

0:16:13.520 --> 0:16:16.200
<v Speaker 1>average person listening to this podcast, like I've got to

0:16:16.200 --> 0:16:19.160
<v Speaker 1>do that in order to secure financial independence? No way.

0:16:19.240 --> 0:16:20.320
<v Speaker 1>What did it feel like for you?

0:16:21.000 --> 0:16:23.240
<v Speaker 2>If things work out in my life as I hope

0:16:23.240 --> 0:16:26.400
<v Speaker 2>that they will, I will go my entire life never

0:16:26.560 --> 0:16:28.840
<v Speaker 2>living alone. I will have slept in the same bedroom

0:16:28.880 --> 0:16:32.000
<v Speaker 2>as my brother growing up. I will have had roommates

0:16:32.040 --> 0:16:35.280
<v Speaker 2>throughout college. The day I stopped having a roommate was

0:16:35.280 --> 0:16:39.480
<v Speaker 2>the day my wife moved in with me into my house.

0:16:39.520 --> 0:16:42.880
<v Speaker 2>Hack and I hope to go first in old age. Right,

0:16:42.960 --> 0:16:47.560
<v Speaker 2>That's that's the that's it. And and most people, I

0:16:47.600 --> 0:16:51.960
<v Speaker 2>think have time where they live alone, and that's wonderful, right.

0:16:52.560 --> 0:16:55.480
<v Speaker 2>I never had that, and I never missed it. I

0:16:55.520 --> 0:16:57.000
<v Speaker 2>don't know what it was, what it would have been like.

0:16:57.040 --> 0:16:59.400
<v Speaker 2>I never missed it. I don't want it in my life.

0:16:59.440 --> 0:17:01.280
<v Speaker 2>And that was a cheat code for me because I

0:17:01.280 --> 0:17:04.560
<v Speaker 2>had roommates the entire way through and I never had

0:17:04.560 --> 0:17:08.199
<v Speaker 2>the fancies, fancy apartment or house that was all to

0:17:08.240 --> 0:17:11.400
<v Speaker 2>myself in there. And that just is such an extraordinary

0:17:11.440 --> 0:17:16.600
<v Speaker 2>advantage in accumulation of wealth and then and and keeping

0:17:16.600 --> 0:17:19.439
<v Speaker 2>costs slow, using housing to as an accelerant on my

0:17:19.480 --> 0:17:21.720
<v Speaker 2>financial journey. I mean, it's just it's like a cheat code.

0:17:22.280 --> 0:17:24.640
<v Speaker 2>It keeps everything low. And and other people that were

0:17:24.640 --> 0:17:26.600
<v Speaker 2>having trouble. One of the things you wanted to talk about,

0:17:26.600 --> 0:17:29.600
<v Speaker 2>I think was the middle class trap where folks are stuck.

0:17:29.640 --> 0:17:31.800
<v Speaker 2>You know, middle class family has a has a mortgage payment,

0:17:32.080 --> 0:17:36.560
<v Speaker 2>they've got their childcare, food expenses, they're contributing a little

0:17:36.560 --> 0:17:37.760
<v Speaker 2>bit to the four oh one k, or maybe even

0:17:37.760 --> 0:17:39.760
<v Speaker 2>a lot to the four oh one K, but they

0:17:39.840 --> 0:17:41.800
<v Speaker 2>have to make a choice at some point. They cannot

0:17:41.840 --> 0:17:44.639
<v Speaker 2>go through this entire retirement stack, maxing the four oh

0:17:44.680 --> 0:17:49.840
<v Speaker 2>one K, maxing the WROTH, maxing the HSA, and maybe

0:17:49.840 --> 0:17:53.119
<v Speaker 2>putting away some for college and having additional liquidity at

0:17:53.160 --> 0:17:55.560
<v Speaker 2>the end of that stack because they don't save enough.

0:17:55.920 --> 0:17:58.440
<v Speaker 2>But if your house hack when you're you know, young,

0:17:59.000 --> 0:18:00.760
<v Speaker 2>you go through that whole stack, because you can max

0:18:00.800 --> 0:18:03.520
<v Speaker 2>out your four oh one K and have plenty of

0:18:03.520 --> 0:18:07.240
<v Speaker 2>cash left over after that each year to reinvest in

0:18:07.280 --> 0:18:10.600
<v Speaker 2>other opportunities in there that provide that flexibility because your

0:18:10.640 --> 0:18:13.840
<v Speaker 2>core expensive housing is so low that whatever you were saving,

0:18:13.880 --> 0:18:15.719
<v Speaker 2>whatever you would have been saving on top, like you know,

0:18:16.160 --> 0:18:19.879
<v Speaker 2>fifteen to twenty percent without house hacking, is then multiplied

0:18:19.960 --> 0:18:23.199
<v Speaker 2>by that drastic drop off in that core expense. And

0:18:23.240 --> 0:18:24.600
<v Speaker 2>so that's the cheat code that I think it is,

0:18:24.640 --> 0:18:28.080
<v Speaker 2>and it just bypasses this problem of access to liquidity

0:18:28.560 --> 0:18:30.560
<v Speaker 2>for your rest of your life. If you did it

0:18:30.640 --> 0:18:32.840
<v Speaker 2>for a period of three to seven to ten years.

0:18:33.000 --> 0:18:35.280
<v Speaker 1>Yes, I think you're right. I think it's a kind

0:18:35.280 --> 0:18:38.040
<v Speaker 1>of a sacrifice you potentially make if you see this

0:18:38.040 --> 0:18:40.720
<v Speaker 1>as a sacrifice or just a willing to live differently

0:18:40.760 --> 0:18:43.560
<v Speaker 1>than your peers in a way that then just gives

0:18:43.600 --> 0:18:47.359
<v Speaker 1>you an insane amount of freedom for the rest of

0:18:47.359 --> 0:18:49.480
<v Speaker 1>your life. And I think it's a worthy trade off.

0:18:50.119 --> 0:18:52.399
<v Speaker 1>When you think about the difference between investing in real

0:18:52.480 --> 0:18:55.960
<v Speaker 1>estate and investing in stocks, how big of a factor

0:18:56.040 --> 0:19:00.200
<v Speaker 1>is control? Right, you have? It seems like certain a

0:19:00.240 --> 0:19:03.399
<v Speaker 1>lot more a lot more control in many ways over

0:19:03.600 --> 0:19:06.800
<v Speaker 1>your real estate portfolio than you do over what happens

0:19:07.160 --> 0:19:10.560
<v Speaker 1>in the stock market. And and even like thinking of

0:19:10.640 --> 0:19:15.000
<v Speaker 1>sweat equity right, the opportunity to improve a property or

0:19:15.119 --> 0:19:17.440
<v Speaker 1>add an adu in the back to to make it,

0:19:17.520 --> 0:19:20.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, cash flow faster. How big of how big

0:19:20.359 --> 0:19:22.720
<v Speaker 1>of a factor's control, and how you think about real.

0:19:22.640 --> 0:19:26.440
<v Speaker 2>Estate that that control. There's this kind of argument about

0:19:26.560 --> 0:19:29.480
<v Speaker 2>is it active or passive in real estate? Right the

0:19:29.840 --> 0:19:32.360
<v Speaker 2>best answer is semi passiver. It depends, of course, which

0:19:32.359 --> 0:19:34.680
<v Speaker 2>frustrates everybody all the time. But but I think that

0:19:34.760 --> 0:19:36.960
<v Speaker 2>in the early days of real estate investing, when you

0:19:36.960 --> 0:19:39.160
<v Speaker 2>can swing a hammer or do that work, and that's

0:19:39.160 --> 0:19:41.840
<v Speaker 2>your you know, instead of side hustling driving for uber,

0:19:42.480 --> 0:19:46.159
<v Speaker 2>I'm painting cabinets, staining cabinets, or painting walls or fixing

0:19:46.240 --> 0:19:49.840
<v Speaker 2>up a rental property. That's a much much higher leverage

0:19:50.040 --> 0:19:53.240
<v Speaker 2>return on my time than I would get for many reasons,

0:19:53.280 --> 0:19:55.280
<v Speaker 2>not just because I'm defraying the contractor costs, but also

0:19:55.320 --> 0:19:57.919
<v Speaker 2>I'm learning these skills that then translate or leave me

0:19:58.240 --> 0:20:01.680
<v Speaker 2>less helpless and related tasks for the rest of my life.

0:20:02.040 --> 0:20:05.720
<v Speaker 2>So that's a very powerful, I think advantage in more

0:20:05.760 --> 0:20:09.040
<v Speaker 2>ways than one will. I will say that the question

0:20:09.080 --> 0:20:12.479
<v Speaker 2>around control, I don't want to overstate it because I

0:20:12.520 --> 0:20:14.040
<v Speaker 2>know a lot of people and I'm in this situation

0:20:14.080 --> 0:20:16.000
<v Speaker 2>with some of my properties that are kind of trapped

0:20:16.080 --> 0:20:19.600
<v Speaker 2>in their rentals. And this problem is across all these

0:20:19.600 --> 0:20:21.800
<v Speaker 2>different asset classes. Right, you have four hundred thousand dollars

0:20:21.800 --> 0:20:23.880
<v Speaker 2>in your four oh one k at age thirty five,

0:20:24.240 --> 0:20:27.240
<v Speaker 2>and you have fifty thousand dollars outside of it in liquidity.

0:20:27.520 --> 0:20:30.320
<v Speaker 2>That's a problem that liquidity is not really there in

0:20:30.320 --> 0:20:33.119
<v Speaker 2>your life if you're still working, because to access it

0:20:33.119 --> 0:20:35.960
<v Speaker 2>you'd have to do something preposterous like realize the income

0:20:36.160 --> 0:20:39.280
<v Speaker 2>on a rough conversion in your current high income tax bracket,

0:20:39.640 --> 0:20:41.919
<v Speaker 2>and then you'd have to know and or pay a

0:20:41.920 --> 0:20:44.520
<v Speaker 2>penalty if you wanted to withdraw it. So it's really

0:20:44.520 --> 0:20:46.560
<v Speaker 2>hard to access that well. Real estate investors are in

0:20:46.600 --> 0:20:48.760
<v Speaker 2>the same position. Right. You have a property that you

0:20:48.800 --> 0:20:52.240
<v Speaker 2>bought for three hundred grand in Denver ten years ago,

0:20:53.000 --> 0:20:55.840
<v Speaker 2>you refinanced it in twenty twenty and got a really

0:20:55.920 --> 0:20:58.639
<v Speaker 2>good low interest rate loan on it. You can't sell

0:20:58.640 --> 0:21:01.560
<v Speaker 2>that thing to somebody else. You can, but you're gonna

0:21:01.560 --> 0:21:03.000
<v Speaker 2>You're gonna take a big haircut on it. And what

0:21:03.000 --> 0:21:05.600
<v Speaker 2>it's a deep buyer's market today, and that property is

0:21:05.640 --> 0:21:07.800
<v Speaker 2>worth more to you. It's worth more to me than

0:21:07.800 --> 0:21:10.040
<v Speaker 2>it is to the buyer because of that low interest

0:21:10.119 --> 0:21:13.359
<v Speaker 2>rate debt that I have that's not transferable with the property.

0:21:13.560 --> 0:21:16.320
<v Speaker 2>So that's a real challenge too, because that equity exists

0:21:16.400 --> 0:21:19.040
<v Speaker 2>on paper, but it's hard to realize without making a

0:21:19.119 --> 0:21:22.800
<v Speaker 2>pretty big sacrifice. So I would say that there's only

0:21:22.840 --> 0:21:26.160
<v Speaker 2>there's only pros and cons or different flavors of challenges.

0:21:26.200 --> 0:21:29.000
<v Speaker 2>There's no real free lunch in the world of investing.

0:21:29.080 --> 0:21:33.120
<v Speaker 2>You can't have your liquidity and your control and your

0:21:33.320 --> 0:21:36.600
<v Speaker 2>you know, all these different options, there's only different flavors

0:21:36.600 --> 0:21:37.600
<v Speaker 2>of it that you can access.

0:21:37.840 --> 0:21:40.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and so I guess when it comes to real

0:21:40.560 --> 0:21:44.280
<v Speaker 1>estate in wanting to enjoy more of Let's say that

0:21:44.320 --> 0:21:46.440
<v Speaker 1>property you bought for three hundred thousand dollars ten years

0:21:46.440 --> 0:21:51.840
<v Speaker 1>ago is worth what eight hundred thousand dollars in you know,

0:21:51.880 --> 0:21:55.119
<v Speaker 1>maybe more that it might be worth more than that, Like,

0:21:55.560 --> 0:21:59.639
<v Speaker 1>how does one think about the how do a protest situation?

0:21:59.680 --> 0:21:59.840
<v Speaker 1>Are you?

0:22:00.160 --> 0:22:00.280
<v Speaker 2>Like?

0:22:00.720 --> 0:22:02.959
<v Speaker 1>Do I buy? Am I in the buying more units

0:22:02.960 --> 0:22:05.199
<v Speaker 1>phase of my real estate investing life? Am I in

0:22:05.280 --> 0:22:08.320
<v Speaker 1>the paying off debt phase of my real estate investing life?

0:22:08.359 --> 0:22:12.600
<v Speaker 1>Am I even thinking about taking the tax smack and

0:22:13.200 --> 0:22:16.040
<v Speaker 1>selling some of those properties off so I can enjoy

0:22:16.160 --> 0:22:20.000
<v Speaker 1>more of the fruits of my labors? Yeah? What is

0:22:20.040 --> 0:22:21.680
<v Speaker 1>a real estate investor to do in that conundrum?

0:22:21.840 --> 0:22:23.280
<v Speaker 2>Well, this is a great question, and this is an

0:22:23.320 --> 0:22:27.080
<v Speaker 2>intellectual challenge that I'm trying to figure out for myself

0:22:27.160 --> 0:22:29.679
<v Speaker 2>right now. And I actually have not gone on discussed

0:22:29.720 --> 0:22:31.560
<v Speaker 2>this live yet because I haven't fully finished it. So

0:22:31.640 --> 0:22:34.439
<v Speaker 2>take my draft year for what you will. But I

0:22:34.440 --> 0:22:36.520
<v Speaker 2>think there's three ways, Like what do you do with

0:22:36.560 --> 0:22:39.080
<v Speaker 2>the rental property in the context of your financial freedom

0:22:39.160 --> 0:22:42.240
<v Speaker 2>number that's in this stuck position. So I think there's

0:22:42.280 --> 0:22:44.440
<v Speaker 2>three a three pronged approach to do in this analysis.

0:22:44.440 --> 0:22:48.280
<v Speaker 2>One is you take a conservative estimate of the after tax,

0:22:48.720 --> 0:22:52.960
<v Speaker 2>after sales, transaction costs, after debt payoff, liquidation value of

0:22:52.960 --> 0:22:55.840
<v Speaker 2>the property. Right. So let's say that's two hundred grand. Right,

0:22:55.960 --> 0:22:58.000
<v Speaker 2>you have your you know, three hundred thousand dollars mortgage,

0:22:58.160 --> 0:23:01.399
<v Speaker 2>six hundred thousand dollars property, you know, five hundred and

0:23:01.400 --> 0:23:03.680
<v Speaker 2>fifty five hundred and sixty thousand dollars property, and sixty

0:23:03.680 --> 0:23:07.159
<v Speaker 2>thousand dollars in transaction costs plus depreciation. Can recapture all

0:23:07.200 --> 0:23:08.920
<v Speaker 2>that kind of stuff that leaves you with a two

0:23:09.000 --> 0:23:12.120
<v Speaker 2>hundred thousand dollars that you could theoretically within a few

0:23:12.160 --> 0:23:16.680
<v Speaker 2>months sell and reposition into a traditional stock bond portfolio

0:23:16.760 --> 0:23:19.320
<v Speaker 2>withdraw at four percent from right. So that's that's one

0:23:19.359 --> 0:23:23.040
<v Speaker 2>way surely that should be factored into somebody's position. The

0:23:23.080 --> 0:23:26.199
<v Speaker 2>second is at the end state, like if you just

0:23:26.400 --> 0:23:29.080
<v Speaker 2>wiped out that mortgage and said twenty years have gone by,

0:23:29.880 --> 0:23:34.520
<v Speaker 2>my income stream remains flat relative to inflation, right, Because

0:23:34.520 --> 0:23:36.919
<v Speaker 2>that's all real estate investing is is, it's an inflation

0:23:36.960 --> 0:23:40.200
<v Speaker 2>adjusted store of value and an inflation adjusted income stream

0:23:40.400 --> 0:23:42.879
<v Speaker 2>that it would be x amount. Let's call it forty

0:23:43.160 --> 0:23:45.560
<v Speaker 2>forty thousand dollars a year. I can add that as

0:23:45.600 --> 0:23:49.240
<v Speaker 2>a pension to my twenty year number, and then the

0:23:49.320 --> 0:23:53.200
<v Speaker 2>hardest part for me is this bridge, because there's some

0:23:53.280 --> 0:23:56.400
<v Speaker 2>cash flow now, and there surely should be a slowly

0:23:56.520 --> 0:24:00.359
<v Speaker 2>increasing stream of cash flow as your mortgage stays flatminally

0:24:00.720 --> 0:24:03.360
<v Speaker 2>and the rents grow with inflations of the other costs.

0:24:03.760 --> 0:24:05.320
<v Speaker 2>And that's the part that I'm stuck on of how

0:24:05.359 --> 0:24:07.920
<v Speaker 2>to map that out. Honestly, in the meantime, I think

0:24:07.920 --> 0:24:10.040
<v Speaker 2>a lot of investors are stuck that way, and so

0:24:10.080 --> 0:24:11.280
<v Speaker 2>you can almost think of it as like, hey, I

0:24:11.320 --> 0:24:12.879
<v Speaker 2>got a pension coming in twenty years, or I got

0:24:12.920 --> 0:24:15.560
<v Speaker 2>a liquidation value today, and this bridge in the middle

0:24:15.800 --> 0:24:18.360
<v Speaker 2>is something that I'm struggling with on how to map out. Intellectually,

0:24:18.400 --> 0:24:21.200
<v Speaker 2>I kind of have the curve you can if you

0:24:21.240 --> 0:24:24.119
<v Speaker 2>can follow my thinking here, but I haven't actually fully

0:24:24.160 --> 0:24:25.680
<v Speaker 2>mapped that out. That's a project for later in the

0:24:25.760 --> 0:24:28.760
<v Speaker 2>year to put this into some kind of spreadsheet or

0:24:28.760 --> 0:24:31.560
<v Speaker 2>excel to help people with this kind of decision making.

0:24:31.560 --> 0:24:33.879
<v Speaker 2>But that's where I'm map from a framework perspective for

0:24:33.920 --> 0:24:36.480
<v Speaker 2>the properties, and I think it's it's a struggle for

0:24:36.520 --> 0:24:38.120
<v Speaker 2>people to come to terms with that because they were

0:24:38.119 --> 0:24:43.159
<v Speaker 2>hoping for maybe more more, more access to that rental

0:24:43.160 --> 0:24:47.440
<v Speaker 2>property liquidity earlier on. So and again there's only trade

0:24:47.440 --> 0:24:49.400
<v Speaker 2>offs with this. Right in the fire community. We also

0:24:49.400 --> 0:24:50.680
<v Speaker 2>have a lot of people who have one hundred percent

0:24:50.720 --> 0:24:53.880
<v Speaker 2>stock portfolios and think they're about to retire, and that's

0:24:53.880 --> 0:24:56.480
<v Speaker 2>not what withdrawal research says. Right with all research says

0:24:56.560 --> 0:24:59.080
<v Speaker 2>you have to have a diversified portfolio with bonds or

0:24:59.119 --> 0:25:02.359
<v Speaker 2>uncorrelated asset and yet in order to turn a pile

0:25:02.400 --> 0:25:05.760
<v Speaker 2>of money that his in equities into a reliable income

0:25:05.760 --> 0:25:08.399
<v Speaker 2>stream that can be harvested for a long duration. So

0:25:09.000 --> 0:25:11.399
<v Speaker 2>no free lunch. But that's that's my intellectual framework for

0:25:12.080 --> 0:25:12.960
<v Speaker 2>the question you're asking.

0:25:13.040 --> 0:25:15.119
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, alread, I got more I want to get to

0:25:15.400 --> 0:25:17.840
<v Speaker 1>with with you, Scott, including I want to talk about

0:25:17.880 --> 0:25:20.520
<v Speaker 1>why you never asked for a raise for your entire

0:25:20.560 --> 0:25:23.000
<v Speaker 1>career working at bigger pockets. We'll get to that and

0:25:23.080 --> 0:25:32.760
<v Speaker 1>more right after this. Yeah, I'm talking with Scott Trench.

0:25:32.760 --> 0:25:36.320
<v Speaker 1>We're talking about avoiding the middle class trap. And I'm curious, Scott,

0:25:36.400 --> 0:25:41.080
<v Speaker 1>like when you're heavy into the fire movement or are

0:25:41.119 --> 0:25:44.159
<v Speaker 1>just really thinking long and harbor about achieving financial independence.

0:25:44.880 --> 0:25:48.960
<v Speaker 1>So often we're talking about locking up money for long

0:25:48.960 --> 0:25:52.360
<v Speaker 1>periods of time, right, and not being able to without

0:25:52.720 --> 0:25:56.240
<v Speaker 1>the trade offs you mentioned of a big of a

0:25:56.320 --> 0:26:00.000
<v Speaker 1>tax hit or a penalty being able to or really

0:26:00.119 --> 0:26:02.879
<v Speaker 1>estate transaction costs to be able to get into some

0:26:03.000 --> 0:26:04.800
<v Speaker 1>of that money. Let's say we wanted to take an

0:26:04.800 --> 0:26:08.800
<v Speaker 1>extended break from away from work for a year or

0:26:08.840 --> 0:26:12.840
<v Speaker 1>something like that. It feels impossible because the trade off

0:26:12.960 --> 0:26:15.960
<v Speaker 1>of accessing that cash is too difficult, it's too costly.

0:26:16.640 --> 0:26:19.360
<v Speaker 1>Do you do you think too many people are investing

0:26:19.359 --> 0:26:22.480
<v Speaker 1>too heavily in their for their far off future and

0:26:22.520 --> 0:26:24.080
<v Speaker 1>not enough for current flexibility.

0:26:24.560 --> 0:26:28.439
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think the framework i'd approach responding you know,

0:26:28.920 --> 0:26:32.199
<v Speaker 2>I'll respond to your question with another framework, which is

0:26:32.480 --> 0:26:37.600
<v Speaker 2>optionality versus optimality. Right. So, there's an optimal approach to

0:26:37.960 --> 0:26:42.560
<v Speaker 2>financial independence for a totally passive investor, and it looks

0:26:42.560 --> 0:26:45.760
<v Speaker 2>something like this. You invest during your working years into

0:26:45.800 --> 0:26:48.959
<v Speaker 2>pre tax retirement accounts like a traditional four oh one K,

0:26:49.800 --> 0:26:52.240
<v Speaker 2>and that keeps your tax bill low. You're deferring this

0:26:52.240 --> 0:26:55.960
<v Speaker 2>this income in high in high income tax years, you

0:26:56.000 --> 0:26:57.960
<v Speaker 2>may need max out your HSA. You take your match,

0:26:58.280 --> 0:26:59.439
<v Speaker 2>go as far as you can in that four oh

0:26:59.440 --> 0:27:04.120
<v Speaker 2>one k, and then fifteen twenty years go by and

0:27:04.320 --> 0:27:07.399
<v Speaker 2>you achieve your you hate your number, and you stop

0:27:07.520 --> 0:27:11.880
<v Speaker 2>working entirely and your income drops to zero. And now

0:27:12.000 --> 0:27:14.240
<v Speaker 2>there's a lot of really good options. If for someone

0:27:14.280 --> 0:27:16.720
<v Speaker 2>who's spending forty eighty or even up to one hundred

0:27:16.720 --> 0:27:19.040
<v Speaker 2>thousand dollars a year to get the money out of

0:27:19.040 --> 0:27:21.240
<v Speaker 2>the four h one k tax efficiently, you can do

0:27:21.280 --> 0:27:24.960
<v Speaker 2>a roth conversion ladder. Right, there's a thirty two two

0:27:25.000 --> 0:27:28.560
<v Speaker 2>hundred standard deduction for married filing jointly couples, so you

0:27:28.560 --> 0:27:32.520
<v Speaker 2>can just convert that every year at zero percent tax bracket. Right.

0:27:33.040 --> 0:27:35.440
<v Speaker 2>Then there's another ten percent tax bracket and a twelve

0:27:35.480 --> 0:27:38.120
<v Speaker 2>percent tax bracket. Then we get to the twenty twenty

0:27:38.119 --> 0:27:40.760
<v Speaker 2>two percent tax bracket. So using that, use it, you

0:27:40.800 --> 0:27:42.680
<v Speaker 2>can use so many people will argue you should go

0:27:42.720 --> 0:27:44.719
<v Speaker 2>up to the top of the twelve percent tax bracket

0:27:44.880 --> 0:27:47.119
<v Speaker 2>to do these roth conversions. You'll pay very minimal tax

0:27:47.359 --> 0:27:51.000
<v Speaker 2>throughout your life, and that's an optimal approach if you

0:27:51.160 --> 0:27:54.440
<v Speaker 2>know for fifteen to twenty years that you're gonna work

0:27:54.760 --> 0:27:57.080
<v Speaker 2>you're gonna grind it out, you're gonna stop, and you're

0:27:57.119 --> 0:27:59.480
<v Speaker 2>gonna be able to manage a very precise level of

0:27:59.520 --> 0:28:04.000
<v Speaker 2>spending in your early retirement and move money through this

0:28:04.480 --> 0:28:07.680
<v Speaker 2>conversion ladder. Or you can also use a tool called

0:28:07.680 --> 0:28:11.920
<v Speaker 2>a seventy two T substantially equal periodic payments to harvest

0:28:11.920 --> 0:28:14.480
<v Speaker 2>the money from a four oh one K. It's still

0:28:14.480 --> 0:28:17.360
<v Speaker 2>income taxes ordinary income, but it's not subject to penalty

0:28:17.480 --> 0:28:21.200
<v Speaker 2>for early withdrawals, and that's an optimal approach. You will

0:28:21.640 --> 0:28:25.000
<v Speaker 2>likely pay less in lifetime taxes doing that approach than

0:28:25.040 --> 0:28:28.399
<v Speaker 2>most other alternatives. The problem that I come back to

0:28:28.560 --> 0:28:32.600
<v Speaker 2>is that life is not a smooth curve. So across

0:28:32.720 --> 0:28:36.480
<v Speaker 2>thousands of these repetitions, with talking with bigger pockets, money listeners,

0:28:36.520 --> 0:28:39.320
<v Speaker 2>real estate investors, people in the fire community, in forums

0:28:39.320 --> 0:28:42.640
<v Speaker 2>and all this kind of stuff, you realize what's the

0:28:42.800 --> 0:28:46.080
<v Speaker 2>unique outlier in the financial independence journey is the person

0:28:46.160 --> 0:28:49.240
<v Speaker 2>who worked a job, put their money into the four

0:28:49.240 --> 0:28:51.160
<v Speaker 2>oh one K and lives off the four percent rule

0:28:51.160 --> 0:28:53.640
<v Speaker 2>of nothing else. I made a big stink about this

0:28:53.640 --> 0:28:55.560
<v Speaker 2>a while back, and I was like, this person doesn't exist,

0:28:55.600 --> 0:28:58.000
<v Speaker 2>their unicorn. And finally I got to meet a few

0:28:58.000 --> 0:29:03.080
<v Speaker 2>people who reasonably close approximate that situation, but they're outliers.

0:29:03.160 --> 0:29:06.000
<v Speaker 2>This almost never happens. It's so rare. Less than one percent,

0:29:06.040 --> 0:29:08.440
<v Speaker 2>maybe less than one in one in five hundred people

0:29:08.480 --> 0:29:11.280
<v Speaker 2>you meet in the financial independence community will meet this

0:29:11.360 --> 0:29:14.320
<v Speaker 2>definition precisely. Almost everybody else has some kind of ace

0:29:14.360 --> 0:29:16.600
<v Speaker 2>in the hole. They've got their rental property, they've got there,

0:29:16.960 --> 0:29:19.960
<v Speaker 2>a small business, their wife works, wife FI. It's one

0:29:20.000 --> 0:29:23.800
<v Speaker 2>of my favorites. It is. There's there's a there. They're military,

0:29:23.880 --> 0:29:26.320
<v Speaker 2>so they have benefits covered for various things, or their

0:29:26.360 --> 0:29:30.320
<v Speaker 2>National Guard, very common. Or they've got some weirdo tail

0:29:30.440 --> 0:29:34.600
<v Speaker 2>situation which is unique to them but very common across

0:29:34.640 --> 0:29:36.920
<v Speaker 2>an aggregation of people. You'll talk to, right, you talk

0:29:36.960 --> 0:29:38.680
<v Speaker 2>to one hundred people, thirty of them are going to

0:29:38.760 --> 0:29:41.120
<v Speaker 2>have this kind of weirdo tail wind that they do,

0:29:41.200 --> 0:29:44.120
<v Speaker 2>like a horse farm where they trade horses, right. Or

0:29:44.280 --> 0:29:47.240
<v Speaker 2>you know this a book that they've written, or a

0:29:47.360 --> 0:29:50.120
<v Speaker 2>musical property. You know, it's just something weird that they

0:29:50.120 --> 0:29:52.240
<v Speaker 2>did earlier in their life or that they've come into

0:29:52.600 --> 0:29:56.680
<v Speaker 2>that is unique to their situation, but common across large samples.

0:29:56.720 --> 0:29:59.160
<v Speaker 2>As a as a variable here or a pension comes

0:29:59.160 --> 0:30:02.160
<v Speaker 2>into play and that's been the problem for me across

0:30:02.200 --> 0:30:05.680
<v Speaker 2>this is if that's the reality for a lot of people,

0:30:06.480 --> 0:30:10.400
<v Speaker 2>and income jumps over time, right, it's not a linear curve,

0:30:10.440 --> 0:30:15.200
<v Speaker 2>it jumps. If you follow this plan of maximizing your

0:30:15.240 --> 0:30:16.800
<v Speaker 2>four oh one K and putting all your money into

0:30:16.840 --> 0:30:20.640
<v Speaker 2>deferred accounts, you're locked into that plan because all of

0:30:20.680 --> 0:30:22.600
<v Speaker 2>your liquidity is going to be in your home equity

0:30:22.680 --> 0:30:24.040
<v Speaker 2>or your four o one k, right, one hundred and

0:30:24.080 --> 0:30:27.479
<v Speaker 2>fifty thousand dollars a year household income family who spends

0:30:27.520 --> 0:30:31.960
<v Speaker 2>eighty ninety thousand dollars a year very reasonably cannot max

0:30:32.000 --> 0:30:35.040
<v Speaker 2>out two four to oh one ks and their HSA

0:30:35.480 --> 0:30:40.800
<v Speaker 2>and their wrath and save for college and build some liquidity.

0:30:41.000 --> 0:30:44.000
<v Speaker 2>And I don't think the journey to financial independence is

0:30:44.160 --> 0:30:47.920
<v Speaker 2>very fun or provides a lot of options. If you

0:30:48.040 --> 0:30:52.240
<v Speaker 2>follow this plan precisely, you may optimally get to the

0:30:52.320 --> 0:30:56.040
<v Speaker 2>endpoint a year sooner, six months sooner, may be less,

0:30:56.760 --> 0:31:00.680
<v Speaker 2>but you're foregoing the optionality of the after time acts liquidity.

0:31:00.680 --> 0:31:02.360
<v Speaker 2>One spouse can't stay home with the kids for a

0:31:02.360 --> 0:31:05.240
<v Speaker 2>few years when they're young. One spouse can't start a

0:31:05.280 --> 0:31:07.880
<v Speaker 2>business and try that out and have a runway for

0:31:07.880 --> 0:31:10.640
<v Speaker 2>two or three years. Those can be very powerful investments.

0:31:10.680 --> 0:31:12.760
<v Speaker 2>On one, you can't buy a rental property and live

0:31:12.760 --> 0:31:14.480
<v Speaker 2>and flip it in the same way if you don't

0:31:14.480 --> 0:31:17.280
<v Speaker 2>have a lot of access to liquidity, So that optimal

0:31:17.320 --> 0:31:20.320
<v Speaker 2>approach actually compresses the option set and I think is

0:31:20.960 --> 0:31:25.360
<v Speaker 2>less optimal. It ends up backfiring on you across the

0:31:25.400 --> 0:31:26.960
<v Speaker 2>reality of the messy journey of.

0:31:26.880 --> 0:31:30.320
<v Speaker 1>Life because it runs up against Yeah, the real life desires,

0:31:30.320 --> 0:31:33.239
<v Speaker 1>hopes and dreams that people have, which is to take

0:31:33.280 --> 0:31:35.560
<v Speaker 1>a flyer on a business that they want to get started,

0:31:35.640 --> 0:31:38.120
<v Speaker 1>to get off the ground, which is to stay home

0:31:38.160 --> 0:31:39.960
<v Speaker 1>with the kids for at least a couple of years

0:31:39.960 --> 0:31:42.040
<v Speaker 1>while they're while they're young. And hey, maybe it also,

0:31:42.560 --> 0:31:44.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, saves a bunch of money on childcare costs,

0:31:44.240 --> 0:31:47.080
<v Speaker 1>which are through the roof right now, I think, and

0:31:47.120 --> 0:31:49.480
<v Speaker 1>I think you're spot on if you yes, if we were,

0:31:49.960 --> 0:31:53.040
<v Speaker 1>if our lives were spreadsheets right then we could we

0:31:53.040 --> 0:31:55.080
<v Speaker 1>could probably pull that off. But most of our lives

0:31:55.080 --> 0:31:58.760
<v Speaker 1>don't act accordingly, and I'm glad they don't, because boy,

0:31:58.800 --> 0:32:02.239
<v Speaker 1>that would make life really crimean boring. I'm curious. I

0:32:02.320 --> 0:32:04.920
<v Speaker 1>just mentioned, like childcare costs, how expensive they are for

0:32:04.960 --> 0:32:09.160
<v Speaker 1>the average person. The biggest expenses are housing, transportation of food.

0:32:09.440 --> 0:32:11.960
<v Speaker 1>If you got young kids, childcare costs are probably up

0:32:11.960 --> 0:32:15.080
<v Speaker 1>there with them, though each of those has become significantly

0:32:15.120 --> 0:32:18.479
<v Speaker 1>more expensive since COVID nineteen, And you know, twenty twenty.

0:32:19.120 --> 0:32:22.680
<v Speaker 1>Does this change in your opinion the trajectory or the

0:32:22.800 --> 0:32:26.360
<v Speaker 1>timeline for a median earner to be able to achieve

0:32:26.400 --> 0:32:28.600
<v Speaker 1>financial independence. You feel like it's maybe harder in twenty

0:32:28.640 --> 0:32:31.760
<v Speaker 1>twenty six than it was for people starting in twenty fifteen.

0:32:32.240 --> 0:32:35.320
<v Speaker 2>I don't know the answer to that, honestly, I think

0:32:35.320 --> 0:32:37.840
<v Speaker 2>that the right answer may be somewhere along the lines

0:32:37.880 --> 0:32:41.480
<v Speaker 2>of it's more unfair and unfair in the sense that

0:32:41.760 --> 0:32:44.760
<v Speaker 2>the person who does live with roommates in twenty twenty

0:32:44.800 --> 0:32:47.480
<v Speaker 2>six and or finds a way to house hack after

0:32:47.520 --> 0:32:50.840
<v Speaker 2>a few years is going to see a much more

0:32:52.280 --> 0:32:55.080
<v Speaker 2>a much more divergent outcome over the next ten to

0:32:55.120 --> 0:32:58.000
<v Speaker 2>twenty years than they did ten, fifteen, twenty years ago,

0:32:58.080 --> 0:33:00.240
<v Speaker 2>Because if you can lock down that housing expensive, find

0:33:00.280 --> 0:33:03.040
<v Speaker 2>the ways to do it cheaply by living with roommates

0:33:03.080 --> 0:33:06.240
<v Speaker 2>or house hacking or live and flipping, then you're going

0:33:06.280 --> 0:33:08.560
<v Speaker 2>to take that out as a variable. All of that

0:33:08.760 --> 0:33:11.200
<v Speaker 2>can go, all of those savings can go towards the

0:33:11.280 --> 0:33:14.440
<v Speaker 2>creation of long term wealth in whatever vehicle you choose

0:33:14.440 --> 0:33:16.320
<v Speaker 2>to apply them to, whether that's more real estate, whether

0:33:16.320 --> 0:33:19.760
<v Speaker 2>that's stocks, whether that's some sort of business pursuit. So

0:33:19.800 --> 0:33:21.920
<v Speaker 2>I think it's more important than ever to focus on

0:33:21.920 --> 0:33:23.560
<v Speaker 2>that leverage point and say how do I keep my

0:33:23.680 --> 0:33:27.360
<v Speaker 2>costs low? And the answer to that is sacrifice. You

0:33:27.640 --> 0:33:30.720
<v Speaker 2>live with roommates, buy a property that's not nearly as nice,

0:33:31.120 --> 0:33:34.320
<v Speaker 2>and make those changes. And if you don't, that's fine,

0:33:34.400 --> 0:33:36.920
<v Speaker 2>but you're going to find it very difficult to float on.

0:33:37.320 --> 0:33:39.720
<v Speaker 2>If you're going to find it incrementally more difficult here

0:33:39.720 --> 0:33:42.280
<v Speaker 2>in twenty twenty six than in twenty fourteen, for example,

0:33:42.680 --> 0:33:45.880
<v Speaker 2>to float your family's expenses, then maybe that family that

0:33:45.920 --> 0:33:47.720
<v Speaker 2>if you're a media income earner. And I think that's

0:33:47.720 --> 0:33:52.600
<v Speaker 2>the challenge that people will face, and the reward is

0:33:52.720 --> 0:33:56.719
<v Speaker 2>exponentially greater for solving it, and the penalty for not

0:33:56.800 --> 0:34:00.960
<v Speaker 2>solving it and not making that sacrifice is a really

0:34:01.160 --> 0:34:04.800
<v Speaker 2>challenging environment of cash flowing your situation and really hard

0:34:04.920 --> 0:34:07.760
<v Speaker 2>trade offs about whether you know, buy the extra groceries

0:34:07.760 --> 0:34:09.120
<v Speaker 2>today or whether you say for retirement.

0:34:09.200 --> 0:34:11.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, I think of all the things my mom

0:34:11.280 --> 0:34:13.279
<v Speaker 1>told me, I love you was at the top, which

0:34:13.320 --> 0:34:15.840
<v Speaker 1>is good, but then life's not always fair. It was

0:34:15.880 --> 0:34:17.759
<v Speaker 1>definitely one of the things I heard a ton from

0:34:17.760 --> 0:34:19.319
<v Speaker 1>my mom, And I think you're right, Like, what you're

0:34:19.360 --> 0:34:24.840
<v Speaker 1>pointing to is the experience you had buying a property

0:34:24.920 --> 0:34:30.239
<v Speaker 1>and house hacking and the accelerator that it was for

0:34:30.320 --> 0:34:34.160
<v Speaker 1>you in terms of your trajectory towards financial independence. It's

0:34:34.239 --> 0:34:40.040
<v Speaker 1>still a meaningful accelerator, but instead of going like zero

0:34:40.120 --> 0:34:42.239
<v Speaker 1>to sixty in one point five seconds, you're going to

0:34:42.320 --> 0:34:44.799
<v Speaker 1>zero sixty in like three point five seconds or something

0:34:44.840 --> 0:34:47.880
<v Speaker 1>like that. Would you just say like it's muted in

0:34:48.000 --> 0:34:50.759
<v Speaker 1>terms of its impact. It's not quite as significant maybe

0:34:50.960 --> 0:34:52.560
<v Speaker 1>as it was in years past, but maybe that makes

0:34:52.600 --> 0:34:54.360
<v Speaker 1>it even more significant and necessary.

0:34:54.760 --> 0:34:58.719
<v Speaker 2>Well, I think it's all relative to the alternative, right,

0:34:58.760 --> 0:35:01.280
<v Speaker 2>So you know, was it easier to find a property

0:35:01.280 --> 0:35:03.319
<v Speaker 2>that covered most or all of the mortgage payment in

0:35:03.360 --> 0:35:06.279
<v Speaker 2>twenty fourteen than now? Of course it was easier in

0:35:06.320 --> 0:35:11.200
<v Speaker 2>twenty fourteen. However, now the option set is renting, buying

0:35:11.239 --> 0:35:14.480
<v Speaker 2>the place as a primary resident, buying a place as

0:35:14.480 --> 0:35:16.879
<v Speaker 2>a primary residence, or house hacking it. And so what's

0:35:16.920 --> 0:35:21.560
<v Speaker 2>the relative advantage between those three choices. I argue that

0:35:21.600 --> 0:35:25.680
<v Speaker 2>the relative advantage of renting over renting is lower, right,

0:35:25.680 --> 0:35:29.040
<v Speaker 2>because renting is a slightly cheaper relative to buying today.

0:35:29.440 --> 0:35:32.279
<v Speaker 2>But the relative advantage of house hacking over buying a

0:35:32.480 --> 0:35:35.640
<v Speaker 2>regular house is as great or even greater than ever.

0:35:36.400 --> 0:35:38.680
<v Speaker 2>And so those are the things that change, and I

0:35:38.719 --> 0:35:40.919
<v Speaker 2>think that's how you have to make the decision making.

0:35:40.960 --> 0:35:42.880
<v Speaker 2>Is what's going to give me the greatest relative advantage

0:35:42.920 --> 0:35:44.040
<v Speaker 2>over my counterfactual.

0:35:44.440 --> 0:35:47.239
<v Speaker 1>No, that's good. I like that clarification. Let's talk about

0:35:47.239 --> 0:35:49.759
<v Speaker 1>your work life for a second, Scott. You mentioned early on, hey,

0:35:49.800 --> 0:35:52.320
<v Speaker 1>you were the CEO of Bigger Pockets. You are no longer,

0:35:52.360 --> 0:35:54.840
<v Speaker 1>and you're still you're still a young man, Scott, So

0:35:55.239 --> 0:35:59.319
<v Speaker 1>you're not like a CEO retiring at age seventy they're

0:35:59.320 --> 0:36:02.120
<v Speaker 1>finally kicking a out. You're in your mid thirties. And

0:36:02.160 --> 0:36:08.040
<v Speaker 1>so I'm curious to hear your why behind that decision,

0:36:08.239 --> 0:36:12.520
<v Speaker 1>Like is it the ideal day exercise that like got

0:36:12.560 --> 0:36:14.120
<v Speaker 1>through to you and You're like, I'm not living my

0:36:14.160 --> 0:36:16.480
<v Speaker 1>ideal days right now, I'm working too much. What was it?

0:36:17.080 --> 0:36:19.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, So there were kind of three reasons behind that

0:36:19.600 --> 0:36:23.960
<v Speaker 2>decision to step down. One was the Bigger Pockets had

0:36:23.960 --> 0:36:26.080
<v Speaker 2>been in an obsession for me for a very long

0:36:26.120 --> 0:36:28.160
<v Speaker 2>period of time. This was not this was more than

0:36:28.200 --> 0:36:31.160
<v Speaker 2>an identity, you know, a CEO of Bigger Pockets. It

0:36:31.280 --> 0:36:34.600
<v Speaker 2>was an all consuming passion project. I love what Bigger

0:36:34.640 --> 0:36:37.400
<v Speaker 2>Pockets does and what we stand for. But also it

0:36:37.560 --> 0:36:40.919
<v Speaker 2>was it was really consuming a huge portion of my life,

0:36:40.960 --> 0:36:43.200
<v Speaker 2>not just in the much more than forty hour a

0:36:43.239 --> 0:36:46.080
<v Speaker 2>week work weeks, but also in the evenings and at

0:36:46.160 --> 0:36:47.920
<v Speaker 2>night in bed and those kinds of things, you know,

0:36:47.960 --> 0:36:49.920
<v Speaker 2>thinking about the decisions of the day, what's coming up

0:36:49.960 --> 0:36:51.799
<v Speaker 2>the next day. So that's one, and the second is

0:36:52.160 --> 0:36:58.000
<v Speaker 2>my skill set is around building community, engaging with people,

0:36:58.280 --> 0:37:02.000
<v Speaker 2>thinking through these intellectual childlenges that that hit real estate investors.

0:37:02.320 --> 0:37:06.200
<v Speaker 2>But the next phase of Bigger Pockets growth needed, I

0:37:06.200 --> 0:37:08.960
<v Speaker 2>think more more of a technology focus and building out

0:37:09.000 --> 0:37:12.680
<v Speaker 2>a great website and technology experience. And that was something

0:37:12.719 --> 0:37:14.920
<v Speaker 2>that I thought somebody else could come in and do

0:37:14.960 --> 0:37:17.239
<v Speaker 2>a better job of than me. And then the third

0:37:17.280 --> 0:37:20.000
<v Speaker 2>thing is my real passion this whole time I thought

0:37:20.000 --> 0:37:22.279
<v Speaker 2>that I don't love real estate has been financial independence,

0:37:22.320 --> 0:37:24.479
<v Speaker 2>Like this is what I love talking about and thinking through,

0:37:24.880 --> 0:37:26.759
<v Speaker 2>and so Bigger Pockets money had been. I've been doing

0:37:26.800 --> 0:37:28.880
<v Speaker 2>it for almost ten years, but it always as a

0:37:28.920 --> 0:37:31.279
<v Speaker 2>side project, so I'd show up, you know, two days

0:37:31.320 --> 0:37:34.160
<v Speaker 2>a week kind of record, go back to CEO job.

0:37:34.360 --> 0:37:36.879
<v Speaker 2>And we never really figured out, like, hey, where does

0:37:36.920 --> 0:37:39.440
<v Speaker 2>this fit into like the real estate investing world. I

0:37:39.480 --> 0:37:41.879
<v Speaker 2>just loved it. I loved I love bigger pockets money,

0:37:41.920 --> 0:37:45.440
<v Speaker 2>and and the goal of real estate investing for me

0:37:45.560 --> 0:37:48.880
<v Speaker 2>was fire. So it's like financial dependence, retire early, So

0:37:49.040 --> 0:37:52.080
<v Speaker 2>why not focus on that and really kind of go

0:37:52.120 --> 0:37:54.600
<v Speaker 2>explore all the areas that I've been missing around tax

0:37:54.600 --> 0:37:57.600
<v Speaker 2>optimization and what are those those challenges and so that's been,

0:37:58.040 --> 0:37:59.840
<v Speaker 2>that's been. Those are the three reasons for the transition,

0:38:00.160 --> 0:38:03.439
<v Speaker 2>and it's been a big life change. The first last year.

0:38:03.560 --> 0:38:07.240
<v Speaker 2>My health has improved immeasurably. I would go through cycles

0:38:07.280 --> 0:38:09.960
<v Speaker 2>of gaining twenty pounds with one kind of stress and

0:38:10.000 --> 0:38:12.400
<v Speaker 2>then losing it, not in a healthy way because I

0:38:12.400 --> 0:38:14.440
<v Speaker 2>was getting fit, but because of the various stresses of

0:38:14.480 --> 0:38:16.600
<v Speaker 2>the job here. And now I've you know, finally gotten

0:38:16.680 --> 0:38:20.560
<v Speaker 2>into a very sustainable routine with my health, like getting outside,

0:38:20.640 --> 0:38:23.920
<v Speaker 2>I don't bring home, you know, the challenges of the

0:38:23.960 --> 0:38:27.319
<v Speaker 2>of high stakes decisions every day to the to the

0:38:27.360 --> 0:38:29.240
<v Speaker 2>you know, the dinner table or beyond.

0:38:29.320 --> 0:38:31.360
<v Speaker 1>So you said, you said, it's been wonderful. You're a

0:38:31.400 --> 0:38:35.239
<v Speaker 1>bigger Buckets for about a decade or as you still

0:38:35.280 --> 0:38:38.759
<v Speaker 1>are in but you're not in the same capacity. Is

0:38:38.760 --> 0:38:40.759
<v Speaker 1>it true that you never asked for a raise or

0:38:41.520 --> 0:38:44.279
<v Speaker 1>that sounds like career self harm? You never asked for

0:38:44.280 --> 0:38:46.760
<v Speaker 1>a raise. I'm so curious to hear what was your

0:38:47.160 --> 0:38:51.120
<v Speaker 1>strategy about getting about compensation for your roles there?

0:38:51.320 --> 0:38:55.360
<v Speaker 2>So, yeah, that I started at Bigger Pockets earning about

0:38:55.360 --> 0:38:59.480
<v Speaker 2>fifty thousand dollars a year in twenty fourteen, and at

0:38:59.480 --> 0:39:01.440
<v Speaker 2>the time I was actually a decrease from what I

0:39:01.440 --> 0:39:04.000
<v Speaker 2>would have been making if I had stayed at Dish Network.

0:39:04.760 --> 0:39:06.840
<v Speaker 2>But I also had the opportunity to, at least in theory,

0:39:06.880 --> 0:39:09.640
<v Speaker 2>to sell advertising for the podcast and for other parts

0:39:09.640 --> 0:39:12.480
<v Speaker 2>of the platform. And so that was my opportunity to

0:39:12.560 --> 0:39:16.000
<v Speaker 2>ramp my income. And over the years, I really only

0:39:16.040 --> 0:39:19.279
<v Speaker 2>looked for more opportunities to sell more. I always you know,

0:39:19.360 --> 0:39:21.440
<v Speaker 2>I didn't say no to a promotion, but I just

0:39:21.480 --> 0:39:24.719
<v Speaker 2>did my very best for Josh and said I'm not

0:39:24.880 --> 0:39:27.680
<v Speaker 2>I'm not just trying to grow Bigger Pockets, you know,

0:39:27.800 --> 0:39:30.120
<v Speaker 2>for for that sake, I'm also trying to do right

0:39:30.160 --> 0:39:32.239
<v Speaker 2>by Josh as the owner and help him make better

0:39:32.280 --> 0:39:35.920
<v Speaker 2>financial decisions, and that earned I think trust with Josh

0:39:35.920 --> 0:39:38.080
<v Speaker 2>the founder over time, to the point where when he

0:39:38.080 --> 0:39:40.640
<v Speaker 2>had to step he promoted me from director to VP

0:39:40.880 --> 0:39:43.200
<v Speaker 2>at BP. I loved being VP at BP. I just

0:39:43.200 --> 0:39:45.560
<v Speaker 2>thought that that that rhyming title soundate so cool. And

0:39:45.600 --> 0:39:49.920
<v Speaker 2>then and then to president in twenty twenty eighteen when

0:39:49.920 --> 0:39:53.000
<v Speaker 2>he decided to sell the business, and so that was

0:39:53.000 --> 0:39:55.600
<v Speaker 2>my career dirojector under Josh, and neither of those came

0:39:55.640 --> 0:39:58.839
<v Speaker 2>with requests for raises. I asked for maybe more commissions.

0:39:59.080 --> 0:40:01.920
<v Speaker 2>I asked for more equit in the business because I

0:40:02.160 --> 0:40:04.360
<v Speaker 2>believed in what we were doing and solve the growth potential.

0:40:04.520 --> 0:40:06.880
<v Speaker 2>But I wanted those more than my base. And the

0:40:06.920 --> 0:40:10.000
<v Speaker 2>reason for that was simple is I already had enough

0:40:10.040 --> 0:40:12.560
<v Speaker 2>base to cover my lifestyle expenses. I was saving plenty

0:40:12.840 --> 0:40:16.120
<v Speaker 2>on that. More base was more taxable income, which is great.

0:40:16.160 --> 0:40:18.400
<v Speaker 2>I wasn't gonna say no to it, but if I could,

0:40:18.480 --> 0:40:21.520
<v Speaker 2>if I made it very clear that in any situation

0:40:21.600 --> 0:40:24.319
<v Speaker 2>where it was possible, I'd rather have something tied to

0:40:24.320 --> 0:40:27.080
<v Speaker 2>a percentage, something that could scale something that was reflective

0:40:27.120 --> 0:40:29.759
<v Speaker 2>of my very best efforts to compensate me. And so

0:40:30.600 --> 0:40:34.160
<v Speaker 2>I got raises, so significant raises, and got my salary

0:40:34.400 --> 0:40:37.560
<v Speaker 2>well into the six figures. But I never asked for

0:40:37.600 --> 0:40:40.200
<v Speaker 2>that as the primary means of compensation increase.

0:40:40.560 --> 0:40:44.279
<v Speaker 1>And so then your work, how Bigger Pockets did as

0:40:44.320 --> 0:40:47.239
<v Speaker 1>a company, well, that was that was directly tied then

0:40:47.520 --> 0:40:51.520
<v Speaker 1>to your compensation. Right, So if the company continues to

0:40:51.560 --> 0:40:55.479
<v Speaker 1>grow and succeed and generate profits, like your bottom line

0:40:55.600 --> 0:40:59.160
<v Speaker 1>is better by having more equity in the business instead

0:40:59.200 --> 0:41:02.400
<v Speaker 1>of just have a bigger paycheck every two weeks.

0:41:02.600 --> 0:41:06.719
<v Speaker 2>Yes, I think, And I keep getting questions about from

0:41:06.719 --> 0:41:09.680
<v Speaker 2>folks about whether they should do the same in their situations.

0:41:10.080 --> 0:41:12.759
<v Speaker 2>And it's really hard to answer that because the right

0:41:12.800 --> 0:41:14.799
<v Speaker 2>answer should I have asked for more of a base

0:41:15.040 --> 0:41:17.279
<v Speaker 2>or should I have asked for more equity? Well, I

0:41:17.280 --> 0:41:20.560
<v Speaker 2>didn't know how to value Bigger Pockets at twenty four,

0:41:20.800 --> 0:41:22.759
<v Speaker 2>twenty five years old like that, that wasn't that, you know,

0:41:22.800 --> 0:41:25.440
<v Speaker 2>twenty six whatever, whatever, you know those three years I

0:41:25.640 --> 0:41:27.360
<v Speaker 2>didn't know how to value the company. I didn't I

0:41:27.360 --> 0:41:30.200
<v Speaker 2>wasn't a private equity analyst and couldn't tell you what

0:41:30.320 --> 0:41:31.840
<v Speaker 2>it was worth. Today or what would be worth the

0:41:31.840 --> 0:41:33.799
<v Speaker 2>next year. I just thought it was special. I thought

0:41:34.120 --> 0:41:35.600
<v Speaker 2>I thought we had something really good going on there,

0:41:35.600 --> 0:41:36.560
<v Speaker 2>and I wanted to be a part of it in

0:41:36.560 --> 0:41:38.680
<v Speaker 2>as big a way as possible. And so, how do

0:41:38.719 --> 0:41:40.399
<v Speaker 2>you then give that advice to like a twenty three

0:41:40.440 --> 0:41:42.439
<v Speaker 2>year old kid, or twenty four year old or even

0:41:42.640 --> 0:41:44.759
<v Speaker 2>or someone who's you've got a family and kids is

0:41:44.800 --> 0:41:46.960
<v Speaker 2>making that same decision at their company. What the right

0:41:47.000 --> 0:41:50.080
<v Speaker 2>approach is in that category, I don't know, but for

0:41:50.120 --> 0:41:52.880
<v Speaker 2>me it was obvious it was instinctive to do this,

0:41:53.080 --> 0:41:57.799
<v Speaker 2>and I believe that you should apply that approach if

0:41:57.840 --> 0:42:01.000
<v Speaker 2>your expenses are much lower than your base galary and

0:42:01.160 --> 0:42:06.759
<v Speaker 2>there's a disproportionate payoff for lowering your base relative to

0:42:06.800 --> 0:42:10.960
<v Speaker 2>the extra bonus sales or equity potential. And I believe

0:42:11.000 --> 0:42:14.439
<v Speaker 2>that was overwhelmingly true in my situation across the years

0:42:14.440 --> 0:42:15.280
<v Speaker 2>at Bigger Pockets.

0:42:15.480 --> 0:42:16.759
<v Speaker 1>All Right, I got more I want to get to

0:42:16.760 --> 0:42:20.240
<v Speaker 1>with you, Scott, including let's talk about primary home purchase

0:42:20.520 --> 0:42:24.160
<v Speaker 1>and why you think that should never be considered an investment.

0:42:24.440 --> 0:42:26.080
<v Speaker 1>We'll get to that and a few other questions with

0:42:26.120 --> 0:42:36.200
<v Speaker 1>you right after this. We're back still talking with Scott

0:42:36.239 --> 0:42:39.600
<v Speaker 1>Trench and I want to talk about the middle class

0:42:39.640 --> 0:42:42.719
<v Speaker 1>trap and how that relates to taxes. Scott, I know

0:42:42.760 --> 0:42:45.279
<v Speaker 1>that's something you really you wanted to discuss and bring

0:42:45.400 --> 0:42:48.040
<v Speaker 1>up on this episode, so fill us in.

0:42:48.360 --> 0:42:50.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. So, remember we talked about our middle class family

0:42:50.840 --> 0:42:54.319
<v Speaker 2>who cannot go through the entire retirement account stack and

0:42:54.600 --> 0:42:58.279
<v Speaker 2>a mass liquidity after tax right, they can't go. They

0:42:58.280 --> 0:42:59.920
<v Speaker 2>can't mass out both for one k is the HSA

0:43:00.400 --> 0:43:06.120
<v Speaker 2>their equivalent and some five twenty nine plans and still

0:43:06.120 --> 0:43:09.400
<v Speaker 2>have enough leftover to actually make some kind of meaningful

0:43:09.440 --> 0:43:12.239
<v Speaker 2>decision in their thirties. So many people are stuck in

0:43:12.480 --> 0:43:14.920
<v Speaker 2>this situation, which I call the middle class trap, and

0:43:14.920 --> 0:43:16.319
<v Speaker 2>get made fun of because it's not really a middle

0:43:16.320 --> 0:43:18.719
<v Speaker 2>class problem. It's really a problem for people who listen

0:43:18.719 --> 0:43:21.720
<v Speaker 2>to personal finance podcasts for decades and are strong savers

0:43:21.719 --> 0:43:24.680
<v Speaker 2>and are likely to retire very wealthy. But anyways, I digress.

0:43:25.040 --> 0:43:27.920
<v Speaker 2>The problem with this is if you want to retire early,

0:43:28.239 --> 0:43:30.960
<v Speaker 2>let's say fifties, you know, early fifties, maybe even late

0:43:31.000 --> 0:43:36.840
<v Speaker 2>forties or even earlier, the optimal allocation asset location dynamic

0:43:37.040 --> 0:43:40.279
<v Speaker 2>is really hard to predict and almost certainly going to

0:43:40.320 --> 0:43:43.080
<v Speaker 2>be a balance you know, imagine your wealth in thirds, right,

0:43:43.120 --> 0:43:46.359
<v Speaker 2>You have your a third in your wroth, a third

0:43:46.400 --> 0:43:48.840
<v Speaker 2>in your four oh one k your traditional four to

0:43:48.920 --> 0:43:52.200
<v Speaker 2>one k R pre tax accounts, and a third after

0:43:52.360 --> 0:43:55.040
<v Speaker 2>tax in your brokerage account. And the reason you don't

0:43:55.080 --> 0:43:57.640
<v Speaker 2>want it all in the pre tax right, or the

0:43:58.160 --> 0:44:00.760
<v Speaker 2>big third, the really big third in your pre tax accounts,

0:44:01.080 --> 0:44:03.640
<v Speaker 2>is because that income that has to come out as

0:44:03.680 --> 0:44:07.279
<v Speaker 2>ordinary income one day, and that's very tax inefficient. You

0:44:07.320 --> 0:44:08.560
<v Speaker 2>can do that up to a certain extent of the

0:44:08.640 --> 0:44:10.480
<v Speaker 2>zero percent tax bracket, like we talked about with the

0:44:10.760 --> 0:44:14.319
<v Speaker 2>thirty two two hundred dollars married filing jointly deduction here

0:44:14.360 --> 0:44:17.960
<v Speaker 2>in twenty twenty six. But what's special about after tax

0:44:18.520 --> 0:44:21.880
<v Speaker 2>growth is that it can be harvested at a zero

0:44:22.000 --> 0:44:25.880
<v Speaker 2>percent long term capital gains tax bracket, which is up

0:44:25.920 --> 0:44:28.360
<v Speaker 2>to like ninety eight five hundred dollars for a married

0:44:28.719 --> 0:44:32.400
<v Speaker 2>filing jointly couple here in twenty twenty six, so that

0:44:32.480 --> 0:44:35.600
<v Speaker 2>should adjust with inflation over time. That's a really powerful

0:44:35.640 --> 0:44:38.359
<v Speaker 2>way to harvest this after tax wealth. And you're not

0:44:38.400 --> 0:44:41.720
<v Speaker 2>really taking advantage of that zero percent long term capital

0:44:41.760 --> 0:44:44.080
<v Speaker 2>gains tax bracket if all your wealth is in the

0:44:44.120 --> 0:44:44.759
<v Speaker 2>four h one k.

0:44:45.000 --> 0:44:47.000
<v Speaker 1>So do you think most people get Most people don't

0:44:47.040 --> 0:44:50.280
<v Speaker 1>realize that the zero percent capital gains tax bracket exists,

0:44:50.280 --> 0:44:54.520
<v Speaker 1>like that there is a way to harvest gains from

0:44:54.560 --> 0:44:56.719
<v Speaker 1>your tax bile broker's account and not pay tax. To

0:44:56.760 --> 0:44:58.200
<v Speaker 1>most people, are they just completely uaware?

0:44:58.280 --> 0:45:00.319
<v Speaker 2>I think there's a lot of unawareness. I think people

0:45:00.320 --> 0:45:02.759
<v Speaker 2>don't follow this then through to the conclusion. It's like,

0:45:02.880 --> 0:45:04.680
<v Speaker 2>I should be maxing out my four oh one K,

0:45:04.880 --> 0:45:06.920
<v Speaker 2>and that's great, you're probably gonna do that. But if

0:45:06.920 --> 0:45:09.760
<v Speaker 2>you are a serious student of personal finance and listen

0:45:09.800 --> 0:45:13.600
<v Speaker 2>to this podcast and read a dozen books, and you're

0:45:13.600 --> 0:45:17.000
<v Speaker 2>saving thirty forty fifty thousand dollars a year towards retirement,

0:45:17.000 --> 0:45:19.520
<v Speaker 2>which is not uncommon for the demographic that listens to

0:45:19.560 --> 0:45:22.680
<v Speaker 2>a podcast like this. Yeah, right, then you're going to

0:45:22.800 --> 0:45:25.160
<v Speaker 2>overfund retirement. You're gonna have so much more at the

0:45:25.239 --> 0:45:27.480
<v Speaker 2>end of your journey than you really need. Or that's

0:45:27.480 --> 0:45:30.200
<v Speaker 2>a real risk, there's a real problem. Like Ronald Reid,

0:45:30.440 --> 0:45:33.600
<v Speaker 2>the janitor who died with eight million bucks. Right, that's

0:45:33.640 --> 0:45:35.600
<v Speaker 2>not the goal. We're engineering for a different outcome here.

0:45:36.080 --> 0:45:38.960
<v Speaker 2>And if you instead don't max out the four oh

0:45:38.960 --> 0:45:40.879
<v Speaker 2>one K for a period of time. I think it's

0:45:40.920 --> 0:45:44.640
<v Speaker 2>like two to five years, depending on your situation, you're

0:45:44.640 --> 0:45:47.160
<v Speaker 2>going to pay, so you're gonna be a little bit suboptimal.

0:45:47.239 --> 0:45:50.319
<v Speaker 2>But the opportunity cost is not nearly as large as

0:45:50.360 --> 0:45:52.759
<v Speaker 2>you likely thought it was because you're only going to

0:45:52.840 --> 0:45:54.920
<v Speaker 2>pay taxes. Now you're almost certainly you have a very

0:45:55.000 --> 0:45:58.279
<v Speaker 2>high probability of not paying taxes on those gains at

0:45:58.320 --> 0:46:00.400
<v Speaker 2>the end state. Now there's whole bunch of trade on. Yeah. Right,

0:46:00.440 --> 0:46:04.360
<v Speaker 2>Like the four one K plans have higher fee investment

0:46:04.440 --> 0:46:06.880
<v Speaker 2>products which can be a drag on their returns relative

0:46:06.880 --> 0:46:09.440
<v Speaker 2>to your after tax brokerage, and the after tax brokerage

0:46:09.440 --> 0:46:10.759
<v Speaker 2>if it's invested in next fund is going to have

0:46:10.800 --> 0:46:13.879
<v Speaker 2>one point five or seven percent dividend yield, which will

0:46:13.880 --> 0:46:15.960
<v Speaker 2>have a small tax drag. So you can beat me

0:46:16.040 --> 0:46:17.440
<v Speaker 2>up on all these assumptions, but the end of the day,

0:46:17.440 --> 0:46:19.879
<v Speaker 2>if you do a really rigorous analysis, the opportunity cost

0:46:19.960 --> 0:46:23.319
<v Speaker 2>is not nearly as large as most people think it is.

0:46:23.640 --> 0:46:26.400
<v Speaker 2>If they forego that deferral for a small number of

0:46:26.480 --> 0:46:30.120
<v Speaker 2>years exit. My argument is for this family is max

0:46:30.160 --> 0:46:32.000
<v Speaker 2>out your four one K for thirty five out of

0:46:32.000 --> 0:46:35.080
<v Speaker 2>forty years, but the first five years or the next

0:46:35.120 --> 0:46:37.399
<v Speaker 2>five years. Don't max it and focus on the after

0:46:37.440 --> 0:46:40.200
<v Speaker 2>tax liquidity position because that will give you options along

0:46:40.239 --> 0:46:43.799
<v Speaker 2>that entire life continuum, and you're only sacrificing a few

0:46:43.840 --> 0:46:46.040
<v Speaker 2>years of that savings in the four oh one K

0:46:46.480 --> 0:46:48.799
<v Speaker 2>And the earlier you do it, the most likely the

0:46:48.840 --> 0:46:51.319
<v Speaker 2>lower relative income tax bracket you're going to be in,

0:46:51.520 --> 0:46:54.080
<v Speaker 2>and the lower the opportunity cost. So that's the argument

0:46:54.080 --> 0:46:56.319
<v Speaker 2>I've been working on in trying to defend rigorously in

0:46:56.360 --> 0:46:59.160
<v Speaker 2>a very complex model, and it doesn't always hold true.

0:46:59.200 --> 0:47:02.680
<v Speaker 2>Everyone's situation is different, but it's surprised it seemings to

0:47:02.680 --> 0:47:04.759
<v Speaker 2>strike a chord and a lot of people who are

0:47:04.760 --> 0:47:05.440
<v Speaker 2>stuck on this problem.

0:47:05.520 --> 0:47:09.600
<v Speaker 1>Well, especially if you're retiring late fifties, you have potentially

0:47:09.680 --> 0:47:13.040
<v Speaker 1>many years of very little income to be able to

0:47:13.120 --> 0:47:18.200
<v Speaker 1>do a lot of tax maneuvering to at least pay

0:47:18.800 --> 0:47:21.799
<v Speaker 1>a low overall tax rate, if not be able to

0:47:21.920 --> 0:47:25.359
<v Speaker 1>completely remove your tax burden. Yeah, I feel like the

0:47:25.400 --> 0:47:28.160
<v Speaker 1>average American, Well, when you look at the statistics, the

0:47:28.200 --> 0:47:31.000
<v Speaker 1>average American has most of their wealth in their primary home.

0:47:31.280 --> 0:47:31.520
<v Speaker 2>YEP.

0:47:32.080 --> 0:47:34.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't think of that as a good thing. I

0:47:34.080 --> 0:47:37.279
<v Speaker 1>think it's a forced method of savings, right, and so

0:47:37.760 --> 0:47:42.000
<v Speaker 1>for some people who aren't going to invest in meaningfully

0:47:42.040 --> 0:47:45.000
<v Speaker 1>in tax advantage retirement accounts in their taxable brokerage account,

0:47:45.320 --> 0:47:49.640
<v Speaker 1>it's at least something, right, But what is your How

0:47:49.640 --> 0:47:51.919
<v Speaker 1>would you want help somebody or want someone to think

0:47:51.920 --> 0:47:56.440
<v Speaker 1>about a primary home purchase and how should they conceive

0:47:56.480 --> 0:47:57.720
<v Speaker 1>of it if it's not an investment.

0:47:58.520 --> 0:48:00.799
<v Speaker 2>Well, I think there's a what the concept of the

0:48:00.840 --> 0:48:05.000
<v Speaker 2>fire portfolio and then your net worth? And so I

0:48:05.000 --> 0:48:08.400
<v Speaker 2>when I create a personal financial statement, for example, I

0:48:08.440 --> 0:48:14.279
<v Speaker 2>will exclude my primary residence from my fire my financial portfolio,

0:48:14.560 --> 0:48:18.200
<v Speaker 2>I'll exclude five twenty nine plans, which are beneficiary accounts,

0:48:18.360 --> 0:48:22.400
<v Speaker 2>don't advise funds. Cars, those are personal properties should be tracked,

0:48:22.640 --> 0:48:25.440
<v Speaker 2>but they're not part of my financial portfolio. And so

0:48:25.480 --> 0:48:27.040
<v Speaker 2>that's how I think about it is it's just it's

0:48:27.040 --> 0:48:28.800
<v Speaker 2>just not part of your It's an expense. Housing is

0:48:29.080 --> 0:48:32.080
<v Speaker 2>an expense, and it's there. You should track the wealth,

0:48:32.080 --> 0:48:34.080
<v Speaker 2>you should know how it contributes to your net worth,

0:48:34.480 --> 0:48:36.160
<v Speaker 2>but it is not something that will contribute to your

0:48:36.200 --> 0:48:39.839
<v Speaker 2>financial independence or flexibility, except in the sense that once

0:48:39.880 --> 0:48:42.200
<v Speaker 2>it is paid off or with a low interest rate mortgage,

0:48:42.200 --> 0:48:44.560
<v Speaker 2>it pegs your housing expense at a lower rate, and

0:48:44.600 --> 0:48:47.880
<v Speaker 2>you'll need therefore less of a financial portfolio to cover that.

0:48:48.560 --> 0:48:50.920
<v Speaker 2>You can also include it in your financial portfolio if

0:48:50.960 --> 0:48:52.880
<v Speaker 2>you intend to sell it. So if you're living in

0:48:52.920 --> 0:48:54.319
<v Speaker 2>a property and you intend to sell it the next

0:48:54.320 --> 0:48:56.080
<v Speaker 2>three or four years and then put that into put

0:48:56.160 --> 0:48:58.880
<v Speaker 2>the proceeds into a financial portfolio, then I'd include it

0:48:59.400 --> 0:49:02.120
<v Speaker 2>as an inflation adjusted store of value that equity. So

0:49:02.160 --> 0:49:04.640
<v Speaker 2>that's how I think about it. I think again, it

0:49:04.680 --> 0:49:07.480
<v Speaker 2>comes down to what's the lifestyle I want to engineer,

0:49:07.600 --> 0:49:09.880
<v Speaker 2>and what's the cost of it. And I would encourage

0:49:09.880 --> 0:49:12.840
<v Speaker 2>everybody to buy us towards if you can. The earlier

0:49:12.880 --> 0:49:15.840
<v Speaker 2>you do it, the better. House hacking or live and flipping,

0:49:15.880 --> 0:49:17.560
<v Speaker 2>where you move into a property and fix it up

0:49:17.880 --> 0:49:19.279
<v Speaker 2>is the cheek code. You just do that a few

0:49:19.320 --> 0:49:23.440
<v Speaker 2>times and you have very high probability of amassing hundreds

0:49:23.480 --> 0:49:26.680
<v Speaker 2>of thousands of dollars that can make every financial decision

0:49:26.719 --> 0:49:28.080
<v Speaker 2>for the rest of your life that much easier.

0:49:28.640 --> 0:49:31.439
<v Speaker 1>I feel like I'm hearing from more people who are

0:49:32.160 --> 0:49:36.759
<v Speaker 1>buying rental properties while renting. How do you think of that?

0:49:36.880 --> 0:49:38.600
<v Speaker 1>Is that is that weird? Or do you think that's

0:49:38.840 --> 0:49:42.040
<v Speaker 1>that's like a wonderful thing for at least some people

0:49:42.040 --> 0:49:44.799
<v Speaker 1>to consider, or is it like, no, don't rent house

0:49:44.800 --> 0:49:45.560
<v Speaker 1>hack homie.

0:49:45.800 --> 0:49:48.120
<v Speaker 2>I would say, I would say that if you are

0:49:48.480 --> 0:49:50.960
<v Speaker 2>very wealthy and have specific goals or very high income,

0:49:51.120 --> 0:49:54.759
<v Speaker 2>then yeah. I've certainly come across people who rent in Manhattan,

0:49:54.800 --> 0:49:57.799
<v Speaker 2>for example, and buy rentals out of state somewhere else.

0:49:58.120 --> 0:50:00.239
<v Speaker 2>So I think that's there's a specific thesis to that,

0:50:00.440 --> 0:50:02.319
<v Speaker 2>and I think it can work out great. It's just

0:50:02.360 --> 0:50:04.520
<v Speaker 2>going to be works. This is a business that you're building,

0:50:04.680 --> 0:50:07.319
<v Speaker 2>and the idea is that you're going to somehow outperform

0:50:07.400 --> 0:50:10.200
<v Speaker 2>the alternative, which is your passively managed index funds over

0:50:10.239 --> 0:50:12.680
<v Speaker 2>some period of time. And I think you can do

0:50:12.719 --> 0:50:14.640
<v Speaker 2>it if you use leverage and build good systems. But

0:50:14.680 --> 0:50:16.120
<v Speaker 2>you got to be careful because you know, I talked

0:50:16.120 --> 0:50:18.000
<v Speaker 2>to this guy who made six hundred thousand dollars in

0:50:18.000 --> 0:50:20.640
<v Speaker 2>Manhattan in a bad year, and his plan was to

0:50:20.640 --> 0:50:25.120
<v Speaker 2>buy Class C rentals in Cleveland. And that's great, you

0:50:25.120 --> 0:50:27.400
<v Speaker 2>know you can do that, but this guy's going to

0:50:27.440 --> 0:50:29.160
<v Speaker 2>have to buy a lot like one hundred and fifty

0:50:29.360 --> 0:50:34.120
<v Speaker 2>Class C rentals in Cleveland while distracted from whatever he does,

0:50:34.200 --> 0:50:37.080
<v Speaker 2>that's so important that it generates six hundred thousand dollars

0:50:37.120 --> 0:50:38.919
<v Speaker 2>a year at income, and that probably number is probably

0:50:38.960 --> 0:50:41.520
<v Speaker 2>only going up if he's actually good at it. That's

0:50:41.680 --> 0:50:44.000
<v Speaker 2>that's a real sacrifice there that I think of not

0:50:44.800 --> 0:50:47.759
<v Speaker 2>enough people actually think through, and I would buy as

0:50:47.760 --> 0:50:50.960
<v Speaker 2>people towards thinking about real estate investments in bigger lumps. Right,

0:50:50.960 --> 0:50:54.840
<v Speaker 2>maybe I'm buying one hundred fift unit portfolio in that situation,

0:50:54.960 --> 0:50:58.719
<v Speaker 2>or or fifteen unit portfolios, ten of them over time.

0:50:59.040 --> 0:51:03.640
<v Speaker 2>But transacting on rinky dink properties relative to your income

0:51:04.040 --> 0:51:06.200
<v Speaker 2>or projected net worth, I think as a trap that

0:51:06.280 --> 0:51:08.400
<v Speaker 2>a lot of real estate investors fall into, and they should.

0:51:08.560 --> 0:51:10.520
<v Speaker 2>They should think about not just where they're at or

0:51:10.520 --> 0:51:12.120
<v Speaker 2>where they're going to be in five ten years with

0:51:12.160 --> 0:51:14.359
<v Speaker 2>their career trajectories. I think a lot of people then

0:51:14.400 --> 0:51:16.879
<v Speaker 2>buy rentals that are pain in the rear and maybe

0:51:16.920 --> 0:51:19.880
<v Speaker 2>do fine, but are insignificant relative to the position that

0:51:19.920 --> 0:51:20.920
<v Speaker 2>they're otherwise building.

0:51:21.200 --> 0:51:22.839
<v Speaker 1>I think that's a really good point, and I want

0:51:22.840 --> 0:51:26.400
<v Speaker 1>to drill down that real quick. So for the average

0:51:26.640 --> 0:51:29.920
<v Speaker 1>person like who's making solid income and they're like putting

0:51:29.920 --> 0:51:31.480
<v Speaker 1>money in the four one K, the roth iray, the

0:51:31.600 --> 0:51:33.480
<v Speaker 1>h I can max all those out and I can

0:51:33.520 --> 0:51:36.719
<v Speaker 1>build wealth that way. But I'm working fifty hours a

0:51:36.760 --> 0:51:39.239
<v Speaker 1>week and I've got a family and so man, the

0:51:39.239 --> 0:51:41.439
<v Speaker 1>rental real estate. I love that Scott did so well

0:51:41.440 --> 0:51:44.080
<v Speaker 1>with it. I love hearing those stories, but my goodness,

0:51:44.120 --> 0:51:47.439
<v Speaker 1>it feels like it would be a distraction in net

0:51:47.440 --> 0:51:49.200
<v Speaker 1>worth building or maybe I just wouldn't be able to

0:51:49.280 --> 0:51:52.200
<v Speaker 1>give it the time that it needs. One. From a

0:51:52.239 --> 0:51:54.279
<v Speaker 1>research perspective, when you talk about before you bought your

0:51:54.280 --> 0:51:56.719
<v Speaker 1>first property, Scott, before I bought my first property, I

0:51:56.719 --> 0:51:59.680
<v Speaker 1>mean we're talking about dozens and dozens, if not one

0:51:59.719 --> 0:52:02.560
<v Speaker 1>hundred plus hours of research and figuring it out and

0:52:02.600 --> 0:52:06.080
<v Speaker 1>learning the ropes. It's it's like learning another language right

0:52:06.120 --> 0:52:08.600
<v Speaker 1>before going to live in France for a year. You're

0:52:08.600 --> 0:52:11.920
<v Speaker 1>spending two years on dual Lingo ahead of time. So

0:52:12.120 --> 0:52:15.640
<v Speaker 1>from that aspect, do you think that rental real estate

0:52:16.200 --> 0:52:18.319
<v Speaker 1>is like? How how should somebody know whether or not

0:52:18.440 --> 0:52:20.200
<v Speaker 1>it makes sense for them given their lifestyle?

0:52:20.320 --> 0:52:21.480
<v Speaker 2>Well, you got to be able to pay that. You

0:52:21.560 --> 0:52:24.320
<v Speaker 2>just you just articulated it perfectly, right, we have bigger pockets.

0:52:24.560 --> 0:52:27.359
<v Speaker 2>We literally map that out as the several hundred hour

0:52:27.920 --> 0:52:31.600
<v Speaker 2>six months to two years emerging that real estate investors

0:52:31.600 --> 0:52:34.680
<v Speaker 2>would put in prior to buying their first property, and

0:52:34.719 --> 0:52:36.520
<v Speaker 2>that's the price. If you don't put that in upfront,

0:52:36.680 --> 0:52:37.880
<v Speaker 2>you pay it on the back end when you have

0:52:37.960 --> 0:52:39.640
<v Speaker 2>a bunch of problems you have to deal with. And

0:52:39.680 --> 0:52:40.920
<v Speaker 2>you could still pay it on the back end, even

0:52:40.960 --> 0:52:42.960
<v Speaker 2>if you put in that research, by the way, on

0:52:43.000 --> 0:52:44.520
<v Speaker 2>the front end, but you pay that. You pay that

0:52:44.560 --> 0:52:47.400
<v Speaker 2>price one way or the other, and that I think that.

0:52:48.000 --> 0:52:49.960
<v Speaker 2>I actually got called out by this by a listener

0:52:50.000 --> 0:52:53.239
<v Speaker 2>recently because I said doctors shouldn't pay that price, right,

0:52:53.239 --> 0:52:54.920
<v Speaker 2>because that's silly. They're going to be distracted from their

0:52:54.960 --> 0:52:57.880
<v Speaker 2>doctor profession. But this guy wrote me a very lengthy

0:52:57.920 --> 0:53:00.799
<v Speaker 2>and very passionate and very correct rebuttaled that, saying no, no,

0:53:01.000 --> 0:53:03.239
<v Speaker 2>the doctor's one. That they should pay it during residency

0:53:03.239 --> 0:53:05.000
<v Speaker 2>when their income's fairly low and they'll be able to

0:53:05.040 --> 0:53:08.040
<v Speaker 2>reap the rewards on real estate returns across a huge

0:53:08.080 --> 0:53:11.640
<v Speaker 2>income earning career. That's very consistent. You can borrow against

0:53:11.640 --> 0:53:13.960
<v Speaker 2>it all that. So I'll eat my words on that

0:53:14.000 --> 0:53:16.840
<v Speaker 2>particular one. But I would say other high earning professions

0:53:16.840 --> 0:53:19.360
<v Speaker 2>that are variable, for example, where the full time attention

0:53:19.440 --> 0:53:22.560
<v Speaker 2>focused on that career, it could be very unattractive to

0:53:22.600 --> 0:53:26.280
<v Speaker 2>put in that time investment that distracts them from the

0:53:26.320 --> 0:53:28.799
<v Speaker 2>sixty first or sixty eighth hour of work that they

0:53:28.800 --> 0:53:31.239
<v Speaker 2>could be doing. That translates directly to income potential. So

0:53:31.280 --> 0:53:34.400
<v Speaker 2>that's very challenging. But for a middle class family, a

0:53:34.440 --> 0:53:37.000
<v Speaker 2>middle to upper middle class family, that's where real estate

0:53:37.000 --> 0:53:38.800
<v Speaker 2>I think has the sweet spot for a lot of folks,

0:53:38.800 --> 0:53:42.200
<v Speaker 2>because that's where your side hustle now is actually something

0:53:42.239 --> 0:53:45.719
<v Speaker 2>that translates directly to hourly savings for all the work

0:53:45.719 --> 0:53:48.560
<v Speaker 2>you put into the property in the immediate future, and

0:53:48.719 --> 0:53:51.360
<v Speaker 2>scales with you as you begin to build that portfolio

0:53:51.360 --> 0:53:54.000
<v Speaker 2>over time. So I think it's hard as the years

0:53:54.040 --> 0:53:57.120
<v Speaker 2>go by and your career progression moves forward, I think

0:53:57.120 --> 0:53:59.719
<v Speaker 2>it gets harder and harder to justify the entry point

0:53:59.760 --> 0:54:01.920
<v Speaker 2>into real estate investing for a lot of people, but

0:54:02.000 --> 0:54:02.520
<v Speaker 2>on everyone.

0:54:02.680 --> 0:54:04.279
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, So the earlier the better if.

0:54:04.239 --> 0:54:05.480
<v Speaker 2>You're going to go into real estate, I think that

0:54:05.520 --> 0:54:07.960
<v Speaker 2>paying that price early gives you the forty years to

0:54:08.320 --> 0:54:12.440
<v Speaker 2>benefit from the expertise that can compound those extra returns. Yes,

0:54:12.640 --> 0:54:14.120
<v Speaker 2>and I think the more likely you are to a

0:54:14.120 --> 0:54:16.480
<v Speaker 2>house hack, which is the ultimate cheat code for this,

0:54:16.560 --> 0:54:19.040
<v Speaker 2>because you mentioned leverage. With a house hack, you could

0:54:19.040 --> 0:54:20.920
<v Speaker 2>have put down five percent instead of your friend who

0:54:20.920 --> 0:54:23.320
<v Speaker 2>just bought a rental property you put down twenty five percent.

0:54:23.360 --> 0:54:25.000
<v Speaker 2>That's a big difference. You can buy it with an

0:54:25.000 --> 0:54:25.919
<v Speaker 2>owner occupant loan.

0:54:26.560 --> 0:54:30.000
<v Speaker 1>Last question, do you think at some point the uh one,

0:54:30.080 --> 0:54:32.040
<v Speaker 1>the market's too tough and you're just like, eh, I

0:54:32.040 --> 0:54:33.359
<v Speaker 1>got a lot of other stuff going on. I got

0:54:33.440 --> 0:54:36.000
<v Speaker 1>enough wealth. I'm not really interested in building up by

0:54:36.000 --> 0:54:39.759
<v Speaker 1>rental property portfolio much anymore. Like I'm doing pretty good

0:54:39.800 --> 0:54:41.920
<v Speaker 1>and the passive income is solid. How do you how

0:54:41.920 --> 0:54:42.960
<v Speaker 1>do you know when to call it quits?

0:54:43.280 --> 0:54:45.920
<v Speaker 2>So I sort of have gone down that rabbit hole

0:54:45.960 --> 0:54:48.839
<v Speaker 2>to a point. So last year I moved money out

0:54:48.880 --> 0:54:52.360
<v Speaker 2>of stocks and bought rentals. But I didn't buy a

0:54:52.360 --> 0:54:54.600
<v Speaker 2>lot of rentals. I just bought two properties. These are

0:54:54.640 --> 0:54:56.480
<v Speaker 2>big properties. One was a million bucks, one was six

0:54:56.520 --> 0:54:59.320
<v Speaker 2>hundred thousand bucks. I paid cash for them. And the

0:54:59.320 --> 0:55:00.600
<v Speaker 2>reason I did that is because now I got my

0:55:00.640 --> 0:55:04.480
<v Speaker 2>income stream for those properties, and that supports a huge

0:55:04.600 --> 0:55:08.440
<v Speaker 2>chunk almost all of the baseline spending for the household.

0:55:08.880 --> 0:55:10.640
<v Speaker 2>And that's it, right, And so I have my levered

0:55:10.640 --> 0:55:13.400
<v Speaker 2>property portfolio, and I still have my financial portfolio and

0:55:13.440 --> 0:55:15.440
<v Speaker 2>some other some other you know, various projects that we

0:55:15.520 --> 0:55:18.440
<v Speaker 2>talked about in that vision document, but that that really

0:55:18.520 --> 0:55:21.400
<v Speaker 2>de risks my situation because I already paid that price

0:55:22.320 --> 0:55:25.000
<v Speaker 2>over the years of managing rental properties, and it didn't

0:55:25.040 --> 0:55:27.120
<v Speaker 2>complicate my position. I in by one hundred and fifty

0:55:27.360 --> 0:55:30.480
<v Speaker 2>Cleveland Class C properties about two quality assets here in

0:55:30.520 --> 0:55:32.719
<v Speaker 2>Denver I can drive to when there's an issue.

0:55:32.520 --> 0:55:34.959
<v Speaker 1>Which is like buying buying headaches if you went that route, right.

0:55:34.880 --> 0:55:37.239
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, So I think that's where that's the advantage of that,

0:55:37.360 --> 0:55:40.799
<v Speaker 2>and you know, you can quibble, right. I think it'll

0:55:40.840 --> 0:55:43.360
<v Speaker 2>be really interesting to see how this works because I

0:55:43.640 --> 0:55:47.200
<v Speaker 2>sold the cash needed to buy those properties in February

0:55:47.520 --> 0:55:50.719
<v Speaker 2>twenty twenty five, and if you remember, the market crash

0:55:50.840 --> 0:55:52.719
<v Speaker 2>right after that, and I was like, oh boy, shure

0:55:52.760 --> 0:55:54.640
<v Speaker 2>hire dodgeable, you know, And then of course it zoomed

0:55:54.680 --> 0:55:56.360
<v Speaker 2>back up and ended the year like fifteen percent up.

0:55:56.400 --> 0:55:57.880
<v Speaker 2>And now it's almost back to where it was in

0:55:57.920 --> 0:56:00.600
<v Speaker 2>February as of this recording here at March thirty, twenty

0:56:00.600 --> 0:56:02.759
<v Speaker 2>twenty six. So we'll see how this ride goes. But

0:56:03.000 --> 0:56:07.040
<v Speaker 2>I wonder if I will get a very close return

0:56:07.120 --> 0:56:10.080
<v Speaker 2>profile to the SMP five hundred unlevered if we assume

0:56:10.080 --> 0:56:12.840
<v Speaker 2>these properties will appreciate three three and a half percent

0:56:13.000 --> 0:56:16.120
<v Speaker 2>over five ten years, and I'll get my I would

0:56:16.120 --> 0:56:18.319
<v Speaker 2>have wrote them both to about a six percent net

0:56:18.320 --> 0:56:21.279
<v Speaker 2>operating income each, so let's call it five and a

0:56:21.320 --> 0:56:24.879
<v Speaker 2>half percent cash flow after allowances and those kinds of things.

0:56:25.280 --> 0:56:27.440
<v Speaker 2>And that includes property management all that stuff. So I

0:56:27.440 --> 0:56:30.560
<v Speaker 2>think that that's we'll see, we'll see how it goes.

0:56:30.600 --> 0:56:32.920
<v Speaker 2>But I think there's a I think there's a good

0:56:32.960 --> 0:56:35.719
<v Speaker 2>chance that I'll have a much smoother ride and or

0:56:35.800 --> 0:56:39.000
<v Speaker 2>maybe a pretty close result to the SMP five hundred

0:56:39.880 --> 0:56:41.919
<v Speaker 2>over that time period. So we'll see. That's but that's

0:56:42.080 --> 0:56:43.160
<v Speaker 2>fundamentally part of the bet.

0:56:43.239 --> 0:56:44.759
<v Speaker 1>We'll have you have you back in a decade, we'll

0:56:44.800 --> 0:56:47.440
<v Speaker 1>check and see how it's gone. Scott. I appreciate you man,

0:56:47.440 --> 0:56:49.640
<v Speaker 1>thanks for joining me. And I know that you've been

0:56:49.680 --> 0:56:51.600
<v Speaker 1>putting in a lot of work on bigger pockets money,

0:56:51.640 --> 0:56:53.759
<v Speaker 1>so and you've got a lot more resources up on

0:56:53.920 --> 0:56:55.440
<v Speaker 1>up on the site. Anything you want to send how

0:56:55.440 --> 0:56:56.200
<v Speaker 1>the money listeners to?

0:56:56.520 --> 0:56:58.080
<v Speaker 2>Oh yeah, if if you want to see, like what

0:56:58.080 --> 0:56:59.640
<v Speaker 2>I'm trying to do one of one of the side

0:56:59.640 --> 0:57:01.080
<v Speaker 2>projects here and I kind of do it in spurts.

0:57:01.080 --> 0:57:02.800
<v Speaker 2>This week will be a heavy spurt because Mindy's on

0:57:02.880 --> 0:57:04.760
<v Speaker 2>vacation and I have a whole bunch of free hours.

0:57:05.520 --> 0:57:09.160
<v Speaker 2>But I'm building out these like spreadsheets or financial planning templates,

0:57:09.200 --> 0:57:12.960
<v Speaker 2>and I think that there's a place for freepful, hopefully

0:57:13.040 --> 0:57:15.919
<v Speaker 2>high quality resources here and I'm in a unique position

0:57:15.960 --> 0:57:17.200
<v Speaker 2>to be able to do that. I think, so Bigger

0:57:17.200 --> 0:57:20.480
<v Speaker 2>Pockets Money dot Com slash Resources has the latest versions

0:57:20.480 --> 0:57:22.440
<v Speaker 2>of these. I have a personal financial statement, for example,

0:57:22.440 --> 0:57:24.440
<v Speaker 2>that separates out those things. I've got that goal setting

0:57:24.480 --> 0:57:28.240
<v Speaker 2>workbook that lists my vision as an example of what

0:57:28.600 --> 0:57:30.800
<v Speaker 2>that could help out, and I keep populating it or

0:57:30.840 --> 0:57:34.160
<v Speaker 2>updating them when people spot errors or suggest improvements in

0:57:34.200 --> 0:57:36.640
<v Speaker 2>some of those resources. So that's the big project for

0:57:36.640 --> 0:57:36.960
<v Speaker 2>the year.

0:57:37.200 --> 0:57:39.000
<v Speaker 1>Well we'll link to that in the show notes as well.

0:57:39.200 --> 0:57:41.000
<v Speaker 1>But Scott, thanks for taking the time, appreciate it.

0:57:41.040 --> 0:57:41.280
<v Speaker 2>Thank you.

0:57:41.360 --> 0:57:45.760
<v Speaker 1>Joel oh Man, such a great conversation with with Scott Trench,

0:57:45.880 --> 0:57:51.600
<v Speaker 1>who is one an awesome dude and two just is

0:57:52.240 --> 0:57:56.840
<v Speaker 1>clearly so passionate about this content, not just for himself,

0:57:56.880 --> 0:58:00.320
<v Speaker 1>not just for his own life, but to see other

0:58:00.360 --> 0:58:03.680
<v Speaker 1>people be able to enjoy the same financial freedom he's

0:58:03.720 --> 0:58:08.400
<v Speaker 1>been able to create for his family, Like like I

0:58:08.480 --> 0:58:10.600
<v Speaker 1>was like going to him after for just a quick second,

0:58:10.680 --> 0:58:14.080
<v Speaker 1>and just all of the resources that he's creating over

0:58:14.080 --> 0:58:18.840
<v Speaker 1>their bigger pockets, money that are free of charge, right

0:58:18.880 --> 0:58:21.360
<v Speaker 1>to anybody who wants it, because he cares so much

0:58:21.400 --> 0:58:26.560
<v Speaker 1>about other people having the freedom, earning that ability to

0:58:27.480 --> 0:58:30.520
<v Speaker 1>have those options and avoid the middle class trap that

0:58:30.560 --> 0:58:33.480
<v Speaker 1>we talked about, right, which is kind of this. Yeah,

0:58:33.520 --> 0:58:35.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm saving for some far off future, but I don't

0:58:35.400 --> 0:58:38.920
<v Speaker 1>know how to realize some of that optionality now. I

0:58:38.960 --> 0:58:41.280
<v Speaker 1>thought Scott gave gave some good tips and I think

0:58:41.600 --> 0:58:45.600
<v Speaker 1>one of the biggest ones, and it's something that's so underutilized,

0:58:45.600 --> 0:58:48.040
<v Speaker 1>and we should man dedicate a whole episode to this

0:58:48.080 --> 0:58:51.320
<v Speaker 1>at some point, especially if you are a younger listener.

0:58:51.840 --> 0:58:57.760
<v Speaker 1>The house hacking strategy is unparalleled in terms of the

0:58:57.760 --> 0:59:01.880
<v Speaker 1>options that can give you Currently if you're able to

0:59:01.920 --> 0:59:04.080
<v Speaker 1>partic it. What if you're able to buy let's say,

0:59:04.440 --> 0:59:07.920
<v Speaker 1>a duplex and rentout one unit, buy a triplex and

0:59:07.960 --> 0:59:11.520
<v Speaker 1>renout two units, buy a property like the first single

0:59:11.520 --> 0:59:13.600
<v Speaker 1>family property I bought. It was just I just had

0:59:13.640 --> 0:59:17.280
<v Speaker 1>a roommate in there with me, and it was a

0:59:17.440 --> 0:59:20.440
<v Speaker 1>ridiculously powerful strategy to be able to cut my living

0:59:20.640 --> 0:59:23.120
<v Speaker 1>expenses so that I could save up that next down

0:59:23.160 --> 0:59:27.160
<v Speaker 1>payment to buy the next home two years later. And

0:59:28.160 --> 0:59:32.360
<v Speaker 1>it's not easy. It takes sacrifice, but there is nothing

0:59:32.560 --> 0:59:35.840
<v Speaker 1>like house hacking. Then the third home, the third property

0:59:35.880 --> 0:59:37.840
<v Speaker 1>I bought was a duplex, and we rented out the

0:59:37.880 --> 0:59:40.600
<v Speaker 1>back part of that home for four four and a

0:59:40.640 --> 0:59:44.640
<v Speaker 1>half years. And it's insane how much it juices your

0:59:44.680 --> 0:59:48.680
<v Speaker 1>ability to reach financial independence, to funnel more money towards

0:59:48.720 --> 0:59:52.120
<v Speaker 1>whether it's another property or towards your retirement accounts and

0:59:52.160 --> 0:59:54.840
<v Speaker 1>your taxable broker's account. Just it frees up so much

0:59:54.920 --> 0:59:58.919
<v Speaker 1>cash because it's reducing your living expenses meaningfully. So house

0:59:58.960 --> 1:00:01.760
<v Speaker 1>hacking is something Scott did, something I did. I think

1:00:01.800 --> 1:00:04.920
<v Speaker 1>we're both sold on that as a way for more

1:00:04.960 --> 1:00:08.480
<v Speaker 1>people to be able to achieve the goal of financial

1:00:08.480 --> 1:00:14.280
<v Speaker 1>independence earlier than most. And so even if you're thinking, man,

1:00:14.320 --> 1:00:16.280
<v Speaker 1>real estate investing's not for me, I don't want some

1:00:17.200 --> 1:00:21.960
<v Speaker 1>gargantuan portfolio, that's okay. I think for a lot of

1:00:22.000 --> 1:00:25.120
<v Speaker 1>people maybe it just it doesn't make sense. I think

1:00:25.360 --> 1:00:28.160
<v Speaker 1>the house hack can be that way where you do

1:00:28.240 --> 1:00:30.640
<v Speaker 1>dip your toes in, but you're not going whole hog

1:00:30.800 --> 1:00:34.680
<v Speaker 1>into real estate investing and it can be your way

1:00:34.760 --> 1:00:38.280
<v Speaker 1>to have at least gained some of that flexibility without

1:00:39.040 --> 1:00:43.440
<v Speaker 1>being a real estate investor who is constantly doing deals

1:00:43.680 --> 1:00:46.720
<v Speaker 1>and has a dozen or more units. That's not necessary

1:00:46.760 --> 1:00:49.400
<v Speaker 1>to achieve financial independence, but I do think the house

1:00:49.440 --> 1:00:52.400
<v Speaker 1>hack can be a crazy good, powerful first step. So

1:00:52.440 --> 1:00:55.600
<v Speaker 1>I hope you enjoyed this conversation. You can find the

1:00:55.800 --> 1:00:58.120
<v Speaker 1>links to some of the stuff we mentioned up on

1:00:58.120 --> 1:01:00.960
<v Speaker 1>our site at how to money dot com. Thanks, as

1:01:00.960 --> 1:01:03.680
<v Speaker 1>always for listening. Until next time, Best friend out