Speaker 1: You are entering the freedom much a black Portland police
Speaker 1: officer speaks the truth about racist BLM protesters. Twitter gets hacked,
Speaker 1: hold the line against COVID panic. An NYPD chief says
Speaker 1: cops are handcuffed by politics, and the Trump campaign makes
Speaker 1: a change. Buck Sexton coding the news and disseminating information
Speaker 1: which actionable intelligence. Make no mistake American. Great, You're a
Speaker 1: great American Again. This is the bucks Sexton Show. Former
Speaker 1: CIA analysts. I can speak to three hours without a
Speaker 1: phone call. Try doing that sometime. No, welcome, my friend
Speaker 1: to the buck Sexton Show. Great to have you here
Speaker 1: with me. As always, thank you so much for spending
Speaker 1: some time with us today. As we go through everything
Speaker 1: that is happening across the country, I wanted to start
Speaker 1: with some recognitions that I think are finally coming to
Speaker 1: the forefront for those who are honest and paying attention
Speaker 1: and looking at what's really happening in the country. You
Speaker 1: have a few things. One, the theory out there that
Speaker 1: we need to have a national lockdown or a series
Speaker 1: of rolling lockdowns at the national level is completely insane.
Speaker 1: I've been consistent on this. I'll explain why. But I
Speaker 1: believe people are starting to recognize this is just a
Speaker 1: non planed plan. There's no there's no good explanation for
Speaker 1: doing this unless it's a very short term reduction in
Speaker 1: cases in a very specific area only for the issue
Speaker 1: of hospital capacity. It will return to that later, not
Speaker 1: because oh my gosh, this state has a lot of cases.
Speaker 1: That's not a good reason to lockdown. But also, what
Speaker 1: has the BLM movement achieved so far? What has been
Speaker 1: the upside of this movement that was not just supported
Speaker 1: but bowed down to buy Corporate America? What have we
Speaker 1: gotten from this? How has it made anything better? Some
Speaker 1: of our major cities are markedly less safe, provably demonstrably
Speaker 1: more violent. There's been millions of dollars of property damage.
Speaker 1: No one can really calculate what's going to happen in
Speaker 1: some of the neighborhoods in places like Minneapolis that were
Speaker 1: burned out, looted. How long is that going to last?
Speaker 1: Are you going to want to buy a home right
Speaker 1: next to where they just had a BLM protest come
Speaker 1: through and burn down a CBS or burn out a
Speaker 1: grocery store? Probably not so. Really, Now, this movement that
Speaker 1: has been around for a few months, you look at
Speaker 1: it and say, hold on a minute, what is it
Speaker 1: doing for us? What is it really all about? Now,
Speaker 1: I've known where we were heading with this because I
Speaker 1: remember the last time there was a BLM movement. The
Speaker 1: media has no institutional memory when it comes to understanding
Speaker 1: why they were wrong the last time, right, whether it's
Speaker 1: you look at the treatment of Kavanaugh and why we
Speaker 1: should actually believe in evidence instead of emotion, or you
Speaker 1: look at the way that they've just completely and utterly
Speaker 1: debased themselves over the Russia collusion nonsense, never learning any lessons.
Speaker 1: You know, maybe just some random leak from a former
Speaker 1: intelligence a former intelligence officer, does not in fact mean
Speaker 1: that Putin was directing Trump in how to steal the
Speaker 1: last election. They never learned their lessons. I think it's intentional.
Speaker 1: But also they're pretty dumb. I mean, most journalists are stupid.
Speaker 1: Not all, some are quite bright, but most journalists are
Speaker 1: pretty dumb. And I've dealt with tons of them at
Speaker 1: this point now for the last decade. It's pretty it's shocking.
Speaker 1: Unless you've actually spent time around the news media, you
Speaker 1: really can't. You really can't get a good feel for Wow,
Speaker 1: these people are generally ignorant, deeply narcissistic, and wildly political
Speaker 1: as Democrats, that's the standard that you get for most
Speaker 1: of them. But Black Lives Matter hasn't done anything yet
Speaker 1: that any person who is judging this based on results
Speaker 1: would think is an improvement. You know, if you have
Speaker 1: a major political a major political group that's out there
Speaker 1: on the streets, a political movement that's saying, you know, hey,
Speaker 1: we have the following demands, and some of the demands,
Speaker 1: you might say, I don't necessarily agree, but at least
Speaker 1: there'd be there'd be some improvement from it, right, Something
Speaker 1: would be better if we did this. Maybe the tradeoff
Speaker 1: isn't worth it, but no, Black Lives Matter has only
Speaker 1: pushed for things that make everything worse for everyone. But
Speaker 1: it does, in making things worse, bring down Trump approval rating.
Speaker 1: It does show power right that they can just hold
Speaker 1: the country hostage to their demands that they during a
Speaker 1: pandemic even can go out and completely forget about and
Speaker 1: get a pass on all of the social distancing and
Speaker 1: mask wearing. And I'd see people increasingly calling them face diapers,
Speaker 1: which I think I tend to agree with that that
Speaker 1: has been happening again and now we're also starting to
Speaker 1: find find out the truth about who's really involved in
Speaker 1: this movement, who's really pushing this. You know, in the
Speaker 1: early days, there were a lot of people that lived
Speaker 1: in there are a lot of minorities who lived in communities.
Speaker 1: And this is just based on the video footage you'd
Speaker 1: see on the news and the leaders of the movement
Speaker 1: who would be talking about police violence and police brutality,
Speaker 1: and that gave a certain credibility at least to the
Speaker 1: movement having some some honest feelings behind it. Now, whether
Speaker 1: you agree with that being a widespread, widespread, honest feelings
Speaker 1: or not, that's a whole other part of this discussion.
Speaker 1: But now what you see increasingly are just crazy braddy
Speaker 1: white kids running around, you know, twenty five thirty year
Speaker 1: olds who are running around and acting like maniacs because
Speaker 1: they have trumped arrangement syndrome and they're using this, they're
Speaker 1: using this shield of Black Lives matter whenever they get
Speaker 1: you know, over indulgent, whatever they do too much, they
Speaker 1: attack cops or whatever it is. Oh, this is about
Speaker 1: black lives matter. Weren't we all arguing as a country
Speaker 1: about statues about a week or two ago, what happened
Speaker 1: to that. Oh you mean, it wasn't really about the statues.
Speaker 1: It's also not really about the killing of George Floyd,
Speaker 1: My friends, This movement is not really about any of
Speaker 1: the things they've told us. It's about it's just find
Speaker 1: areas that are emotionally volatile, Find areas where there's a
Speaker 1: damage to the national psyche, Exploit them, make people angry,
Speaker 1: give them an outlet for all the rage and all
Speaker 1: the frustration that we feel because of these unnecessary shutdowns
Speaker 1: that we've been put through for months now. And you
Speaker 1: have a great mobilization tool for the Democrat Party, getting
Speaker 1: the base energized and making everybody else in the country
Speaker 1: who just wants to go back to life miserable and
Speaker 1: scared that they're gonna say the wrong thing and get
Speaker 1: fired from their job, that they're gonna, you know, go
Speaker 1: too far with one thing and there'll be a problem.
Speaker 1: You know, they'll say something online and all of a
Speaker 1: sudden their business will be boycotted. So what's this movement's
Speaker 1: ethos really? Who's pushing And I said to you, there
Speaker 1: are a lot of white liberals, young white liberals, who
Speaker 1: have taken over much of the activity here and what
Speaker 1: are they like, you know, because they tell us that
Speaker 1: they're anti racist, and now if you don't sign on
Speaker 1: for their agenda, you are not, in fact an anti racist.
Speaker 1: You have to do that or else you're kind of
Speaker 1: complicit in racism. That's the way they structure this, that's
Speaker 1: the way they set it up. And you have a
Speaker 1: Portland police officer, Officer Jackson, who gave an interview and
Speaker 1: either you won't see this on the mainstream news channels,
Speaker 1: gave an interviewer where he explains, now, this is a
Speaker 1: this is a black police officer in Portland, Oregon talking
Speaker 1: about what it's like to try and deal with these
Speaker 1: protesters who the media refers to as mostly peaceful, anti racist,
Speaker 1: anti fascist and all about black lives. Well, here's a
Speaker 1: black cop telling you what he thinks about these protesters.
Speaker 1: Play clip two. It says something when you're at a
Speaker 1: black Lives Matter protest, you have more or minorities on
Speaker 1: the police side, then you have in a violent crowd,
Speaker 1: and you have white people screaming at black officers. You
Speaker 1: have the biggest knows I've ever seen. What was it
Speaker 1: like in that capacity in the first few weeks when
Speaker 1: the offence was up around the Justice Center. I got
Speaker 1: to see folks that really do want change, like the
Speaker 1: rest of us, that have been impacted by racism, and
Speaker 1: then I got to see those people get faded out
Speaker 1: by people that have no idea what racism is all about.
Speaker 1: I've never experienced racism that don't even know that the
Speaker 1: tactics that they are using are the same tactics that
Speaker 1: were used against my people. And they don't even know that.
Speaker 1: They don't even know the history. They don't know what
Speaker 1: they're saying. Coming from someone who graduate from PSU with
Speaker 1: a history degree, it's actually frightening, you know. They say,
Speaker 1: if you don't know your history, you repeat it, and
Speaker 1: watching people do that to other people. Here, you have
Speaker 1: a very eloquent black cop in Portland laying out for
Speaker 1: you something you won't here on the mainstream news channels.
Speaker 1: You won't You won't see the New York Times writing
Speaker 1: this up. He is telling you what we all knew
Speaker 1: was going to happen here, which is that in the
Speaker 1: beginning there are people who saw everyone saw what happened
Speaker 1: to George Folloydson. My god, that's terrible. There needs to
Speaker 1: be accountability and there will be people in that moment,
Speaker 1: who really do want to address racism, want to look
Speaker 1: at police brutality, won't want to have a serious adult
Speaker 1: conversation about those serious and adult issues. But the left
Speaker 1: was never interested in that. It was always the the
Speaker 1: ignition point for the exploitation of their own political movement.
Speaker 1: It was never meant to be a real structural change,
Speaker 1: not for the not for the apparatus of the Democrat
Speaker 1: Party in the left. And that's why, as this officer
Speaker 1: just told you, and he's been all along, Portland has
Speaker 1: been one of the it's one of the tremendous hotspots
Speaker 1: for left wing the most aggressive left wing street protest
Speaker 1: activism stuff anywhere in the country. Probably the most active
Speaker 1: ANTIFA chapter in the whole United States is in Portland.
Speaker 1: So this guy's been dealing this cop has been dealing
Speaker 1: with this for months, and he's saying, you know what,
Speaker 1: this has really turned into a bunch of mostly white,
Speaker 1: ignorant liberal you know millennials and gen z who were
Speaker 1: showing up and saying incredibly truly racist things to a
Speaker 1: black cop, real racism like you know, Nazi Germany kind
Speaker 1: of racism stuff to a black coup. And they think
Speaker 1: they think they're fighting racism. No, they're just angry morons
Speaker 1: who have been indoctrinated by the Democrat Party and the
Speaker 1: media and all these different cultural institutions that are controlled
Speaker 1: by the left in this country that want to divide
Speaker 1: this by race. They want to divide us in the
Speaker 1: most vicious and irreparable ways. He's telling you, and he
Speaker 1: has more to say. Play clip three. A lot of
Speaker 1: times someone of color, black, Hispanic, Asian come up to
Speaker 1: the fence and directly want to talk to me. Hey,
Speaker 1: what do you think about George Floyd? What do you
Speaker 1: think about what happened about this? I go to the fence,
Speaker 1: someone white comes up if the police don't talk to him.
Speaker 1: That was the most bizarre thing because I could see
Speaker 1: it coming. I even had a young African American girl
Speaker 1: tell me, why is it you guys aren't talking to us.
Speaker 1: I said, honestly, this is now the twenty I think
Speaker 1: it was twenty third day of doing it. Every time
Speaker 1: I try to have a conversation with someone that looks
Speaker 1: like me, so a white comes up and blocks him
Speaker 1: and tells him not to talk, and then write. When
Speaker 1: I said that, this white girl pop right in front
Speaker 1: of her she said, he just said that was gonna happen.
Speaker 1: I said, straight up, I say, you know, I've been
Speaker 1: called the N word, She's been called the N word.
Speaker 1: Why are you talking to me this way? Why do
Speaker 1: you feel that she can't speak for herself to me?
Speaker 1: Why is it that you feel you need to speak
Speaker 1: for her when we're having a conversation. Then when you
Speaker 1: go to a gentrified community and one of the first
Speaker 1: pictures I saw that one of the business I was
Speaker 1: looted was a black owned business, I'm like, they they're
Speaker 1: not from here, they don't even know what they're even doing.
Speaker 1: This should be this interview is a must watch everyone
Speaker 1: across the country who cares about what's going on now
Speaker 1: with this Black Lives Matter movement. Here you have a
Speaker 1: black cop who is completely sympathetic to the concerns of
Speaker 1: the minority community when it comes to actual racism and
Speaker 1: police civilian interactions. And that's as I've said, there are
Speaker 1: instances of police brutality that are reprehensible, and there should
Speaker 1: be There should be both accountability and transparency. But that's
Speaker 1: a very different thing to say that you know, one
Speaker 1: out of ten thousand or fifty thousand cops is a
Speaker 1: racist who's going to hurt black or brown people out
Speaker 1: of some animus. Is a very different thing than saying
Speaker 1: cops are racist pigs and we should show them no
Speaker 1: respect to the point, which is what the Libs are saying,
Speaker 1: which with a Democrat BLM movement is saying, and to
Speaker 1: the point where they will have white kids go up
Speaker 1: to a black cop as he just said, and use
Speaker 1: the N word. I mean, you sit here and you say,
Speaker 1: how is this even possible? Because it for the actual
Speaker 1: movement and the apparatus of the left, it's not about
Speaker 1: saving minority lives. It's not even about minority lives that
Speaker 1: have been lost in the past George Floyd or others.
Speaker 1: It is about using points of emotion and division in
Speaker 1: our society for a broader political mobile realization against their opposition,
Speaker 1: which they view as conservative, right wing Trump America. That's it.
Speaker 1: All the other stuff is just a dodge. All the
Speaker 1: other stuff is a ploy, and unfortunately it has been
Speaker 1: a largely successful one. But can you imagine listen to
Speaker 1: what this officer is saying. He says, minorities at these protests,
Speaker 1: black and brown people at the protest come up to
Speaker 1: him as a black man and want to have a
Speaker 1: real conversation about George Floyd. And I can see that
Speaker 1: that makes sense. I get that, And you know what,
Speaker 1: I'm sure this comp would say that was terrible. That
Speaker 1: doesn't represent what I do or any of my colleagues,
Speaker 1: or do you. Every day we all reject that. I've
Speaker 1: heard the entire NYPD from a top to bottom already
Speaker 1: say that. I'm sure this guy would say the same
Speaker 1: thing and has said the same thing. But then that
Speaker 1: would lead to more dialogue, and that would lead to
Speaker 1: perhaps more people who are concerned from the black and
Speaker 1: brown community about police violence, having a greater understanding of
Speaker 1: police and police having a better line of communication with them,
Speaker 1: and things would actually improve. No, that's not what the
Speaker 1: white liberal kids want now. They want to scream racial
Speaker 1: epithets at black cops while thinking they're fighting racism. These
Speaker 1: are all Democrats who are doing this. And I know
Speaker 1: people say, Buck, why are you making a political Because
Speaker 1: it is political. That's all this is. It's not about
Speaker 1: improving society. It's about power and people thinking they are
Speaker 1: better than other people because of their beliefs. Black Lives
Speaker 1: Matter has already collapsed into incoherence and disarray except as
Speaker 1: a tool of rage and division, which is what continues
Speaker 1: to be useful to the Democrat Party. Reform. This was
Speaker 1: never about reform showing respect to black cops. That you
Speaker 1: cannot tell me that a person cares about black lives
Speaker 1: and would in their first interaction with a black police
Speaker 1: officer show not just disrespect to the officer, but disrespect
Speaker 1: to him on account of his race. And believe that
Speaker 1: this movement is not intellectually and morally rotten, because it is.
Speaker 1: You're in the Freedom Art. This is the Buck Sexton
Speaker 1: Show podcast. But we have other cities that are out
Speaker 1: of control. They're like war zones and if the city
Speaker 1: isn't going to straighten it out of local politicians formed
Speaker 1: in this case don't say this for political reasons. They're
Speaker 1: all Democrats. They're liberal, left wing Democrats, and it's almost
Speaker 1: like they think this is going to be this way forever.
Speaker 1: Where in Chicago sixty eight people was shot and eighteen
Speaker 1: died last week. We're not going to put up with that.
Speaker 1: We're not going to put up with it. I hope
Speaker 1: the President's able to take action on this. They should
Speaker 1: send in additional federal law enforcement to assist clear the
Speaker 1: Chicago Police Department is incapable of bringing that violence curve down.
Speaker 1: If this is really about black lives as we are
Speaker 1: told it is, and saving black lives, then the focus
Speaker 1: should be on where are lives being lost every single day?
Speaker 1: Not once every three to six months from the hand
Speaker 1: at the hands of a police officer, but every single day.
Speaker 1: But once again, the Democrats don't care very much about that,
Speaker 1: do they. Thanks for listening to the Buss and Show podcasts.
Speaker 1: Remember to subscribe on Apple podcasts, the iHeartRadio app, or
Speaker 1: wherever you get your podcasts. Oh, but the defund the
Speaker 1: cops movement hasn't actually really happened yet. They'll say the
Speaker 1: budgets may have been changed, but the funding doesn't change
Speaker 1: for a while. To that, I just want to point
Speaker 1: out that it's not just about the dollars and cents
Speaker 1: being taken out a police budgets. It's also about the
Speaker 1: message that it sends. It's about the message that it
Speaker 1: sends on the streets to the bad guys, to the
Speaker 1: cops who are the ones that have to make those,
Speaker 1: in the heat of the moment, high risk decisions about
Speaker 1: what level of forced to use, what bad guy to
Speaker 1: chase down the alleyway or not. How aggressive is their
Speaker 1: policing going to be against violent felons, or they're gonna say, look,
Speaker 1: unless we've got no choice, we're just not really going
Speaker 1: to exert ourselves to enforce the enforce the law. And
Speaker 1: because they don't want to get arrested themselves and put
Speaker 1: on some kind of a public show trial with people
Speaker 1: like Deblasio who are just looking for cops to make
Speaker 1: examples of. All the time, it used to be understood
Speaker 1: that if a cop was acting in good faith and
Speaker 1: applying his training properly, you know, it's not it's never
Speaker 1: it's never a pretty thing. This is what libs don't
Speaker 1: want to believe. It's never a pretty thing. When you
Speaker 1: you see someone who is fighting a cop to get
Speaker 1: taken down to the pavement and handcuffed, it doesn't look
Speaker 1: like you know, two people in Western Europe having an
Speaker 1: espresso and having a nice chat. People are going to
Speaker 1: get hurt. There's going to be some you know, some
Speaker 1: cuts and bruises that happen. This is the this is
Speaker 1: the day to day reality of law enforcement, which is
Speaker 1: why part of the movement that we should be having
Speaker 1: if we're really going to talk about criminal justice reform
Speaker 1: and discussions is how to interact with cops. That's actually
Speaker 1: an important thing to understand. And I know people don't
Speaker 1: usually talk about this, but every every cop that I know,
Speaker 1: and I've I've got a cop in my family, I've
Speaker 1: worked at the NYPD. I mean, I know a lot
Speaker 1: of cops. They will tell you that when respect is given,
Speaker 1: respect is reciprocated, and that's just the nature of police
Speaker 1: civilian interactions. When disrespect is the first thing that is
Speaker 1: on the cop, that then shows a mentality that they
Speaker 1: will often react to more aggressively because one they're trying
Speaker 1: to establish control and some authority in a situation, and
Speaker 1: two they want to go home that night. The cop
Speaker 1: wants to go home to his or her you know, family.
Speaker 1: They don't want this, And that's another part of the
Speaker 1: discussion that is never never prominent enough. The cops, you
Speaker 1: want to pull their gun and use it on somebody,
Speaker 1: it's even if they absolutely have no choice but to
Speaker 1: do that, it's a nightmare. You know, they're gonna get investigated,
Speaker 1: They're gonna get put on you know, on desk duty,
Speaker 1: or or just you know, suspended with paypenning investigation, and
Speaker 1: you know they might get sued in civil cordy even
Speaker 1: it's it's a nightmare. They do not want to do that.
Speaker 1: They all know that there is no jurisdiction in the country, like, yeah,
Speaker 1: you know, just pull the trigger on a guy today,
Speaker 1: no big deal, you know, just hap. No, that's not true.
Speaker 1: But we never get to have a discussion about this
Speaker 1: the way it is we have discussions the way the
Speaker 1: media reflects this, and I mean the cowards in our
Speaker 1: mainstream media who would call the cops the instant, the
Speaker 1: instant that they heard some ruffians walking across the backyard
Speaker 1: of their Hampton's estate. Who good heavens. Oh yeah, it
Speaker 1: sounds like some fraternity brothers are running through the yard
Speaker 1: for a prank. Call the police, you know that's who's
Speaker 1: telling you. Yeah, defund the cops. Defund the cops. Sure
Speaker 1: they are. Police Commissioner Dermot Shay has said that they
Speaker 1: are going too far now with the politics against the cops,
Speaker 1: and he said that the anti cops sentiment, anti cops sentiment,
Speaker 1: not just anti police brutality from the George Floyd protests
Speaker 1: are being used to further political agendas. Oh wow, you
Speaker 1: mean the police commissioner of the biggest police force in
Speaker 1: the country under a far left Democrat or has finally
Speaker 1: had enough, and it's like, this is just about hating cops.
Speaker 1: That's what this is. This is just about hating cops
Speaker 1: for some people and mobilizing people with that hatred. The masses,
Speaker 1: the anti Trump Trump de range left with this as
Speaker 1: their main point of entry, with this as their rallying cry.
Speaker 1: And the people that that officer Jackson in Portland mentioned,
Speaker 1: particularly black and brown individuals, who want to have a
Speaker 1: constructive dialogue with police and want to express their concerns
Speaker 1: and reservations to cops. And I'm sure some of them
Speaker 1: have had poor treatment at the hands of police. We
Speaker 1: know that that happens, though of course, no question those
Speaker 1: voices have been marginalized, pushed aside. This isn't about a
Speaker 1: constructive dialogue, come on, of course not. This is about
Speaker 1: crazy Wellesley masters, engenders, studies grads screaming in the face
Speaker 1: of police officers that they are betrayed. Their people are about.
Speaker 1: That's what this is about. That's what you see at
Speaker 1: these protests. Okay, let's be honest. I've been to them,
Speaker 1: and I've been doing nothing but watching and covering them.
Speaker 1: It's insane. So you got the NYPD commissioner telling us
Speaker 1: what we know, but affirming it. This is about politics,
Speaker 1: the anti cop stuff BLM is not. You know that
Speaker 1: these protests they're not making anything better with their occupied
Speaker 1: zone in DC and the disaster in Seattle or people
Speaker 1: died because of that, People lost their lives because a
Speaker 1: bunch of left wing morons thought that creating a police
Speaker 1: free zone was a good idea. And then you have
Speaker 1: the agenda of the Democrat Party. What are the Democrats
Speaker 1: you remember, there's there's always it's like, think of it
Speaker 1: like the IRA the Irish Republican Army and chin Fain, right.
Speaker 1: They the political arm of the terrorist group. That's that's
Speaker 1: they have to think of elected Democrats in office. So
Speaker 1: you have the street you know, the street paramilitaries of Antifa.
Speaker 1: You have these people that are doing, you know, using
Speaker 1: violence and coercion and threats and mob mentality to get
Speaker 1: attention and to push issues. And then the Democrats in
Speaker 1: elected office in their fancy building in DC and wherever
Speaker 1: else in state capitals across the country, they're supposed to
Speaker 1: translate this into legislation that benefits the left. So this
Speaker 1: is just one hand washing the other. This is the
Speaker 1: one two punch of the Marxists that we see in
Speaker 1: our own midst. And here's Chuck Schumer com coming through,
Speaker 1: coming through today with exactly what you'd expect from Fox
Speaker 1: News quote. Senate Democrats released a three hundred and fifty
Speaker 1: billion dollars plan to tackle systemic racism and historic under
Speaker 1: investment in communities of color that have been a hit
Speaker 1: hardest by the coronavirus pandemic and economic downturn. The Economic
Speaker 1: Justice Act calls for ten major investments over the next
Speaker 1: five years to help communities of color with childcare, healthcare,
Speaker 1: jobs programs, infrastructure improvements, and housing assistants. Senate Democrats frame
Speaker 1: their proposal as a down payment, so it's just a
Speaker 1: beginning on calls to address systemic racism and economic disparities
Speaker 1: that have been spotlighted in the wake of the coronavirus
Speaker 1: pandemic and death of George Floyd. There's a growing movement
Speaker 1: underway for Congress to tackle these disparities through slavery reparations
Speaker 1: to African Americans. This is the Chuck Schumer statement, long
Speaker 1: before the pandemic, long before the recession, long before this
Speaker 1: year's protest. Structural inequalities have persisted in healthcare and housing,
Speaker 1: the economy, and education. End quote, pay off the base, folks,
Speaker 1: that's what this is. Schumer is letting no, this is
Speaker 1: not going to go through the Senate. Republicans are not
Speaker 1: going to go along with this, obviously, but this is
Speaker 1: this is now where you see what the real game
Speaker 1: plan is. Now with people all all angry and talking
Speaker 1: about this and racial tensions at this very high point,
Speaker 1: Democrats are saying, yeah, you know what we need to do.
Speaker 1: We just need to write a check from the taxpayers
Speaker 1: Bank account for three hundred and fifty billion dollars to
Speaker 1: tackle systemic racism, write a check to UH to communities
Speaker 1: of color, and make sure that they come out in
Speaker 1: full force for Democrats this fall. There's a payoff. This
Speaker 1: when when I told you there's this mobilization. This has
Speaker 1: been the plan all along, right, this is what we
Speaker 1: knew that that Democrats weren't going to be able to
Speaker 1: do anything to make people safer or tackle tackle police
Speaker 1: issues in a meaningful way. That was all just a
Speaker 1: smoke screen. They are look Justice, Scalia wrote in an
Speaker 1: affirmtive action decision for the Supreme Court of the Racial
Speaker 1: Entitlement State. Senate Democrats are saying, we need to just
Speaker 1: start paying people, giving people more resources based upon skin color.
Speaker 1: That is what they are saying. This is money for
Speaker 1: communities of color. We want to shovel money to communities
Speaker 1: of color. Whatever happened to equal protection under the law?
Speaker 1: I mean, this is we've gone so far beyond this now.
Speaker 1: Oh and even reparations. They're talking about reparations now, which
Speaker 1: we know will continue to come up. Here. This is
Speaker 1: classic quid pro quo power politics. This is the Democrats saying,
Speaker 1: all right, so the communities of color in this country
Speaker 1: have been their issue of police tension has been exploited
Speaker 1: by the Democrats, predominantly by white liberals all across America.
Speaker 1: This issue has been exploited, and so now we're just
Speaker 1: going to say, let's give a lot of money to
Speaker 1: those communities in the hopes that they will of course
Speaker 1: come out and vote in the highest possible numbers this fall.
Speaker 1: This is a payoff. This is a payoff. That's what
Speaker 1: it's all now you're seeing with this was all really about.
Speaker 1: It's not about making people safer on the streets. It's
Speaker 1: not about stopping police violence. It's about creating the political
Speaker 1: momentum for Democrats like Pelosi and Schumer to promise to
Speaker 1: just flood left wing interests, particularly in communities of color.
Speaker 1: But you just start writing checks out of your out
Speaker 1: of your checkbook as the taxpayer to interests in groups
Speaker 1: that they like. That's what that's always that and the
Speaker 1: electoral impact that that promise has was always with this
Speaker 1: was about so now now we're now it's all coming together.
Speaker 1: Now we're seeing it all As for this as a
Speaker 1: justice movement, it's a fraud. So fraud. And what's what's
Speaker 1: also sad is that even if they were to spend
Speaker 1: whatever this is, three hundred and fifty billion dollars, You
Speaker 1: think that Congress, you think that the Congress with Democrats leading,
Speaker 1: are going to spend three hundred and fifty billion dollars
Speaker 1: and systemic inequality goes away or racism evaporates. No, it's
Speaker 1: just as they said, it's a down payment. The next
Speaker 1: call will be for half a trillion, and then a
Speaker 1: call after that will be for it. It's just about
Speaker 1: this is white liberals atop the Democrat Party finding out
Speaker 1: ways to stay in power by writing checks as payoffs
Speaker 1: to constituencies that they have convinced have no other choice
Speaker 1: in the political system and need to support them and
Speaker 1: will get paid for their trouble. That's what's going on.
Speaker 1: You're in the Freedom hud. This is the Buck Sexton
Speaker 1: Show podcast. And what else are the Libs offering other
Speaker 1: than payoffs to their base with the taxpayers footing the bill.
Speaker 1: What else are they promising they will do? This fall
Speaker 1: well on the energy proposal from Biden, because remember climate
Speaker 1: change and renewable energy, green energy, the Green New Deal
Speaker 1: are these are points of religious fervor for Democrats. You
Speaker 1: can't have a normal conversation with them what makes sense
Speaker 1: what doesn't, because we're all gonna die. And as we
Speaker 1: listen to Gretta Thornberg, remember that the same people will
Speaker 1: tell you they believe in science. So like listen to
Speaker 1: the sixteen year old high school dropout about how we
Speaker 1: should spend trillions of dollars of money because of an
Speaker 1: incredibly complicated scientific issue for which there is no There
Speaker 1: is neither a crisis nor a cure. So that's how
Speaker 1: it is. But here you have the Here you have
Speaker 1: Trump pointing this out. I think rightly play clip twelve.
Speaker 1: Biden wants to massively reregulate the energy economy, rejoin into
Speaker 1: Paris Climate Accord, which would kill our energy totally and
Speaker 1: you'd have to close twenty five percent of your businesses
Speaker 1: and kill oil and gas development. They still haven't explained
Speaker 1: what they're gonna do to power our great plants and factories,
Speaker 1: but at some point I'm sure they will. We'll learn
Speaker 1: that from AOC who's in charge of energy. She's in
Speaker 1: charge along with Bernie. It's AOC and Bernie are in
Speaker 1: charge of energy. I don't think Texas is too happy
Speaker 1: about that. What do you think you think we'll call
Speaker 1: up the governor, Governor Abbot great governor will ask how
Speaker 1: do you like that? Governor? I don't think I didn't
Speaker 1: want to waste the phone call because I would know
Speaker 1: how he felt since he's talking about Texas and energy.
Speaker 1: May was here from the Energy Secretary Texan Rick Perry
Speaker 1: play seven. You know listening to that clip, that reminds
Speaker 1: me of Joe Biden looking into the camera and telling
Speaker 1: the NRA that I'm coming after you and I'm going
Speaker 1: to get all your guns. He's looking into the eye
Speaker 1: of the American energy industry and basic saying I'm coming
Speaker 1: after you, and I'm gonna get all of your jobs
Speaker 1: because that far left radical energy agenda that he talks
Speaker 1: about will be a massive job killer. I mean hundreds
Speaker 1: of thousands of jobs in the oil and gas industry,
Speaker 1: in the coal industry, I mean all across the board.
Speaker 1: I mean pipeline companies, the union jobs that are being
Speaker 1: created out there. You know, if I'm a union guy
Speaker 1: in the in the energy industry, I stay away from
Speaker 1: Joe Biden like he's the plague. He's telling you the truth.
Speaker 1: Ran There's gonna be enormous job losses, but also just
Speaker 1: tremendous expense and cost for no benefit other than the
Speaker 1: ideological benefit that democrats get from thinking that they're all
Speaker 1: saving the planet. Was saving the planet? Yeah, Captive Planet,
Speaker 1: you guys remember that was like it was actually a superhero.
Speaker 1: It was not a very good cartoon, but I did
Speaker 1: used to watch a lot of cartoons as the care
Speaker 1: it called Captain Planet. He's always fighting against polluters, wasn't it?
Speaker 1: Was it a good cartoon? Gi Joe was much better?
Speaker 1: Can if Gijoe anymore? You know? Military guns? Oh no,
Speaker 1: not allowed. Now it's all talenttubbies or whatever's cool now
Speaker 1: for kids. Rick Perry's telling the truth. This is what's
Speaker 1: going to happen. But Democrats are okay with that. Think
Speaker 1: about the way that they have completely justified in their
Speaker 1: minds the continued and we're about to talk about lockdown
Speaker 1: on where we are with all that in the COVID era.
Speaker 1: But they continued lockdown of the country because it is
Speaker 1: obviously very bad for Trump if the country is locked down.
Speaker 1: And even though there's a lot of suffering that will
Speaker 1: happen because of this, even though there'll be a lot
Speaker 1: of destroyed I mean, millions of people have jobs, lost,
Speaker 1: businesses destroyed, maybe never come back. Bankruptcies are going to surge,
Speaker 1: We're going we're going to be unraveling a lot of
Speaker 1: the long term costs of these lockdowns in the months ahead.
Speaker 1: No matter what, they're just adding to that tab. As
Speaker 1: well as the undiagnosed cancer and the and the health
Speaker 1: issues and the overdoses, drug overdoses, all these things we
Speaker 1: see from lockdowns. Democrats are unbothered by all of that
Speaker 1: because they know that it means Trump is in a
Speaker 1: weaker position to get reelected. Yeah, and also some of
Speaker 1: them are terrified of the virus because their own media
Speaker 1: outlets are constantly telling them that a virus that has
Speaker 1: a ninety nine point seven percent general general survivability rate
Speaker 1: and over eighty percent I think is what I've seen recently.
Speaker 1: If people have mild to no symptoms, who get it
Speaker 1: that we should shut down the country again for they
Speaker 1: want a national shutdown. Let's let's talk about that a
Speaker 1: little bit. That's an important place to go. Thanks for
Speaker 1: listening to The bus Esson Show podcasts. Remember to subscribe
Speaker 1: on Apple podcasts, the iHeartRadio app, or wherever you get
Speaker 1: your podcasts. It's gotten bad enough that even Donald Trump
Speaker 1: finally decided to wear a mask in public. I'm glad
Speaker 1: he made the shift. Mister president, is not enough. Who
Speaker 1: won't be able to turn the corner and get American
Speaker 1: people back to work safely without presidential leadership, Mister President,
Speaker 1: Open everything now isn't a strategy for success? Is barely
Speaker 1: a slogan. I mean, Joe Biden really sounds like he's
Speaker 1: gonna fall asleep at the podium in any second when
Speaker 1: he's talking, and I mean it's just gonna just it's
Speaker 1: gonna accidentally smack his face down. On the on the
Speaker 1: podium and be at naptime. Look, Democrats don't care. I
Speaker 1: get it. We're all supposed to pretend like this isn't obscene.
Speaker 1: It is obscene that this is their presidential candidate. It's obscene.
Speaker 1: I mean, Hillary, say what you will? You know she
Speaker 1: was sharp. You don't want to be on the wrong
Speaker 1: side of her. Yeah, I definitely don't want to be
Speaker 1: somebody that is on the bad side of the Clintons.
Speaker 1: We could all make a lot of jokes about that.
Speaker 1: I won't right now. Hollow, but at least she was
Speaker 1: she was with it. Joe Biden is a is a
Speaker 1: total figurehead for the party, which is why the Bernie
Speaker 1: Sanders AOC input into his agenda is so concerning, because
Speaker 1: that's going to be the agenda. We all know this.
Speaker 1: There's no other agenda. There's no moderate agenda. The Democrat
Speaker 1: Party more doesn't exist. They're just they're just putting out
Speaker 1: the old you know, the old Biden guy out there.
Speaker 1: So it seems like they're not trying to make the
Speaker 1: country go socialist. But on the reopening point, increasingly what
Speaker 1: I see here and I told you a couple of
Speaker 1: exist said, well, we'll go back and revisit where we
Speaker 1: are now, where you know, and we'll see who's right.
Speaker 1: We'll see who's telling the truth. And this, this is
Speaker 1: what I can tell you. It's not as bad as
Speaker 1: the media is telling you, which is I'm sure not
Speaker 1: surprising to any of you. M It's not as as
Speaker 1: horrific as you've been led to leave. And there's a
Speaker 1: lot of meaning this most recent search. The virus is
Speaker 1: very bad. We all know that, but I mean what
Speaker 1: we're seeing now in different hospitals. But the impetus for
Speaker 1: clicks and for politics to lie about this or to
Speaker 1: misrepresent the issue is so powerful that you can spend
Speaker 1: all day just trying to chase down the truth, and
Speaker 1: then there's already a whole new set of lies that
Speaker 1: are out there. It's very hard to fight back against
Speaker 1: just this fire hose of misinformation of disinformation about how
Speaker 1: oh now we're in a second wave. Oh now we're
Speaker 1: we're finally the back of the medical community is being
Speaker 1: broken by this. It's not true. We have and accepting
Speaker 1: the fatality numbers that come in, we have we have
Speaker 1: well under a thousand fatalities. A few a couple of
Speaker 1: days ago, it was more like in the four or
Speaker 1: five hundred range. You know, some days at seven or
Speaker 1: eight hundred. But we are not seeing anything close to
Speaker 1: what we had at the real peak in New York,
Speaker 1: where you had two to three thousand fatalities a day,
Speaker 1: depending on whose numbers. Remember, these numbers are also imperfect.
Speaker 1: You see these stories about completely overloaded hospitals in Houston
Speaker 1: in particular, and in some places in the Orlando area
Speaker 1: in Florida. That's also not true. No one has been
Speaker 1: denied care. I see this. People say, oh, the emergency
Speaker 1: rooms have a way time of up to two to
Speaker 1: three hours. Emergency rooms always have a way time that
Speaker 1: is forever. I mean, you know, it's amazing unless you
Speaker 1: have a hatchet, you know, sticking out of the back
Speaker 1: of your head when you go in, and even then
Speaker 1: you might wait a little bit too long. Our emergency
Speaker 1: rooms are not quick moving institutions unless they have absolutely
Speaker 1: no choice. So that's one part of this. ICUs tend
Speaker 1: to be at eighty to ninety percent capacity all the
Speaker 1: time because to have think about this, how could you
Speaker 1: have an ICU that's only ten or twenty percent full
Speaker 1: and not run costs that would bankrupt the hospital. So
Speaker 1: They're always trying to have ICUs that are getting full
Speaker 1: usage and that have the necessary capacity and have a
Speaker 1: surge capacity. But you don't run ICUs at forty percent
Speaker 1: or thirty percent. People seem to think that hospitals try
Speaker 1: to operate with nothing but empty beds everywhere getting ready
Speaker 1: for No. No, We've gone through the whole empty bed
Speaker 1: scenario in New York where we had the floating hospital
Speaker 1: come up here from the Navy, and we had the
Speaker 1: hospitals being set up in tents and Central Park and
Speaker 1: the Javits Convention Center, thousands of beds almost entirely empty.
Speaker 1: And think about what New York was going through the
Speaker 1: worst of the pandemic, the worst of the deaths and
Speaker 1: the numbers. But here here's what I'm I'm I'm confident of.
Speaker 1: Right now, I can't tell you it's it's absolutely the case,
Speaker 1: but I'm confident of We're going to see the case
Speaker 1: number start to drop precipitously within ten days from now. Oh,
Speaker 1: I mean cases are going to start to go down precipitously.
Speaker 1: In the areas where you've had this search, you have
Speaker 1: not had a huge, huge change in the way people
Speaker 1: are living their lives. Yes, I know they've they've gotten
Speaker 1: they've changed some indoor dining, they've made some some switches
Speaker 1: here and there. But you're going to see this, You're
Speaker 1: going to see the numbers start to go down, and
Speaker 1: there's going to be this desperation to say, see it's
Speaker 1: because we listen to the science and there were more masks.
Speaker 1: That's just not that's not realistic. That's not true. This virus, increasingly,
Speaker 1: when you look at the analysis of it from epidemiologists
Speaker 1: who just feel the need to try to tell the truth,
Speaker 1: may have a much lower may have a much lower
Speaker 1: heard immunity threshold hi T is how this is abbreviated
Speaker 1: in medical medical documents that you'll read. May have a
Speaker 1: much lower herd immunity threshold than people realize. We've been
Speaker 1: told that herd immunity you have to be sent seventy
Speaker 1: to eighty percent of people would have to get infected
Speaker 1: for true herd immunity. Okay, well think about this. If
Speaker 1: they heard immunity threshold takes into account T cell immunity
Speaker 1: for coronavirus general coronavirus exposure, it could actually be a
Speaker 1: much lower number of infect did to get to that
Speaker 1: herd immunity threshold. I'm seeing analyzes from doctors of something
Speaker 1: more along lines of twenty twenty to thirty percent. New
Speaker 1: York City already hit twenty percent based on prology testing. Okay,
Speaker 1: New York City already was at a twenty percent infection rate,
Speaker 1: and they did some pretty some pretty widespread zology testing.
Speaker 1: And if you add to that T cell immunity, so
Speaker 1: that's your you know, the white blood cells in your system,
Speaker 1: their ability to go in and destroy the virus very quickly,
Speaker 1: very early on in the infection, you may have. You
Speaker 1: may have what is effectively herd immunity without us even
Speaker 1: really knowing it. Which makes a lot of sense because
Speaker 1: in New York I can tell you we were on
Speaker 1: lockdown after there was this massive spread and the disease
Speaker 1: kept kept getting spread, kept getting spread all over the place.
Speaker 1: They act like, oh, you know, Cuomo, with all this stuff,
Speaker 1: we brought down the curve, We did it. You yet
Speaker 1: you listen to me, and no things are better. You
Speaker 1: didn't listen to me, and bad things happen above. No,
Speaker 1: that just doesn't that that doesn't bear any resemblance to
Speaker 1: the reality that people like me we're living in at
Speaker 1: the time where we were on total lockdown, all wearing masks,
Speaker 1: and you still add cases all over all over the
Speaker 1: Tristate area and a lot of fatalities. This virus, like
Speaker 1: other viruses, goes into an area, it spreads among the
Speaker 1: community until there's there it reaches a herd immunity threshold,
Speaker 1: and then it moves on that. That seems to be
Speaker 1: the only logical explanation for what is happening right now
Speaker 1: and why places that have not had about a twenty
Speaker 1: percent infection rate or seeing this huge spike in cases.
Speaker 1: There is no hiding from the virus. There's no avoiding
Speaker 1: the fact that there are going to be a lot
Speaker 1: of infections. The smartest policy all along, the smartest policy
Speaker 1: all along would have been to protect the vulnerable and
Speaker 1: take basic mitigation measure is on a personal responsibility basis,
Speaker 1: so that we didn't overload hospitals because that that that
Speaker 1: was a possibility and it still is a possibility in
Speaker 1: some places. All this other stuff about you got to
Speaker 1: wear masks, outside mask, math mask, do what we say lockdown,
Speaker 1: lockdown is just wrong, and that you're hearing a lot
Speaker 1: less about Sweden right now, because Sweden was a place
Speaker 1: that didn't do what it was supposed to do, which
Speaker 1: was lockdown, and it's in the middle of the pack
Speaker 1: for fatality ratio in Europe. But they're they're back to school,
Speaker 1: eating in restaurants, back out at bars, and their fatalities
Speaker 1: are at basically zero now and their cases have fallen
Speaker 1: off a cliff and they've never locked down. Now. I know,
Speaker 1: I people like to to think of, Oh, but Sweden
Speaker 1: is a country where there's a Smurgish blurger. It's like
Speaker 1: the special Swedish thing where everyone just does what they're told.
Speaker 1: Give me a break. Okay, the Swedes didn't do what
Speaker 1: the global health community was insisting they do, and the
Speaker 1: country had a reasonable outcome under the circumstances and didn't
Speaker 1: go through the same degree of insanity that a lot
Speaker 1: of other places did. You know? There are Italian doctors
Speaker 1: that you were not hearing from now who are saying, yeah,
Speaker 1: this has essentially burned through our population. There are enough
Speaker 1: people who might have Remember it's antibody, anti cell immunity,
Speaker 1: those two things come on. I just asked a top
Speaker 1: infectious disease doctor who's who I've known for a very
Speaker 1: long time. I said, is this thesis plausible. He said,
Speaker 1: it's entirely plausible. We need more testing to prove that
Speaker 1: it's true, but this would be an answer what other
Speaker 1: people are telling you. We just didn't wear enough masks,
Speaker 1: we didn't listen to the science enough. There's just no
Speaker 1: evidence supporting this. The theory doesn't hold together. It doesn't
Speaker 1: make sense. We were all masked, we were all social
Speaker 1: distancing in New York, and we got obliterated by this thing,
Speaker 1: absolutely obliterated largely. I mean. One of the reasons that
Speaker 1: the numbers were so high was because it got into
Speaker 1: in part because of the decision of Governor Cuomo, which
Speaker 1: is still the worst public health decision I've ever heard
Speaker 1: of in my life and caused many people to lose
Speaker 1: their lives. To send people with COVID nineteen into the
Speaker 1: nursing homes, and then once it's in the nursing home,
Speaker 1: it spreads like a highly infectious cold, but it can
Speaker 1: kill people. That's what you're dealing with with COVID nineteen.
Speaker 1: It's you know, think about when some of your office
Speaker 1: has a cold. You know, people unless you have immunity
Speaker 1: to it, unless you've already been exposed to that virus.
Speaker 1: You know, people are going to be getting colds all
Speaker 1: over the place. You know this, You've seen it, You've
Speaker 1: dealt with it yourself. This is a This is the
Speaker 1: only way that you can explain what has happened, and
Speaker 1: that's that there were some parts of the country where
Speaker 1: they had some infection level, but they had not yet
Speaker 1: reached the threshold of a herd immunity level where finally
Speaker 1: it dies off and goes down dramatically. Why is it
Speaker 1: that they're there are European countries that are fully open
Speaker 1: right now, I mean that are open, you know, back
Speaker 1: kids in school, people eating in restaurants. You're gonna tell
Speaker 1: me that, oh, they just obeyed so much better than
Speaker 1: we did. This is the assumption you'll hear from lives
Speaker 1: in this country. You know, they did their part to
Speaker 1: take We haven't done our part yet. Did they do
Speaker 1: their part in Italy and in Spain when there they
Speaker 1: couldn't control the disease at all? What is more likely
Speaker 1: that there's a natural progression of this virus that in
Speaker 1: a community is going to occur and you do the
Speaker 1: best you can to manage it, or that some place,
Speaker 1: some places are just really great at handling this because
Speaker 1: of reasons that no one can really point to, and
Speaker 1: other places no one cares. They just want to They
Speaker 1: just want to get the virus. They want to die.
Speaker 1: I'm telling you that the the lower herd immunity threshold,
Speaker 1: antibody and T cell immunity combined means that if you
Speaker 1: have twenty percent of the population infected, and I remember
Speaker 1: it's also that twenty percent that may be the most
Speaker 1: likely because of where they work and what they do
Speaker 1: and who they're engaging with, maybe the most among the
Speaker 1: most likely people to get infected. But you reach that
Speaker 1: level and there still will be people that get this,
Speaker 1: but it's not going to have that same exponential spread.
Speaker 1: It's going to keep running into running into blocks in
Speaker 1: the passage of the disease. And we can only we're
Speaker 1: only measuring for crology through the purology tests for antibodies,
Speaker 1: not for T cell essentially white blood cell immunity, right
Speaker 1: not not where we can find the antibody copies to
Speaker 1: the virus. But we're not looking at T cell immunity,
Speaker 1: and that's a thing that exists as well. This is
Speaker 1: all established in the science. You can check this out
Speaker 1: for yourself. So if you get to twenty percent antibodies
Speaker 1: and maybe another twenty or thirty percent T cell immunity,
Speaker 1: which some people that that means that they've already been
Speaker 1: exposed to this virus in the past, may not have
Speaker 1: even known it. Then you're at a place where the
Speaker 1: spread of this disease it's still going to exist, It's
Speaker 1: still going to be a threat, but it's not going
Speaker 1: to completely overtake the population and overwhelm the system. With that, now,
Speaker 1: let's talk about what the heck is Russia doing trying
Speaker 1: to hack into our vaccine research. You're in the Freedom Hunt.
Speaker 1: This is the Buck Sex and Show podcast. Russia has
Speaker 1: been accused of trying to steal information about COVID nineteen vaccines.
Speaker 1: A big news story that broke today. This is from Reuters.
Speaker 1: The Britain's National Cybersecurity Center said on Thursday that Russian
Speaker 1: backed hackers were trying to steal COVID nineteen vaccine and
Speaker 1: treatment research from institutions around the world. The UK, the US,
Speaker 1: and Candidate released a coordinated state which said the attacks
Speaker 1: are being carried out by a group called APT twenty nine,
Speaker 1: also known as Cozy Bear. Remember this, we talk about
Speaker 1: this on the show Cozy Bear not to be confused
Speaker 1: with Fazzy Bear. The NCSC said, it's almost certain that
Speaker 1: plus that Cozy Bear is part of the Russian intelligence services.
Speaker 1: So Russian intelligence trying to hack in to COVID nineteen research.
Speaker 1: Why why would that be something? Well, it's quite obvious,
Speaker 1: right vaccination vaccination research and the actual vaccines that may
Speaker 1: be coming online. There is going to be an enormous
Speaker 1: incentive for countries to be able to be ahead of
Speaker 1: others on having immunity in their population from the vaccine.
Speaker 1: And just think of what that will do for growth
Speaker 1: and for economic activity. Think of it because because it
Speaker 1: can take months to create enough vaccine for your population.
Speaker 1: So put aside for a second, which place is because
Speaker 1: they can't measure it yet, which places might be at
Speaker 1: at limited or total herd immunity thresholds they're going to
Speaker 1: there's gonna be a public perception that you need this
Speaker 1: vaccination in mass dosage to return to normal life if
Speaker 1: your country is three months, six months, ten months ahead
Speaker 1: of another country when it comes to you, because you
Speaker 1: know you're going to see nationalism kick up here a lot,
Speaker 1: that's for sure. Any American company that's making vaccines. We're
Speaker 1: gonna want them. Hear first. This is true. It's true
Speaker 1: all over the world, you know. And as much as
Speaker 1: we'd like to think that they can just manufacture billions
Speaker 1: of doses of the vaccine and get them to everyone,
Speaker 1: it's gonna it's gonna be an enormous logistical challenge. This
Speaker 1: stuff takes time. This stuff isn't going to be I
Speaker 1: know there's operation warp speed, but it's not going to
Speaker 1: be that simple. So getting the vaccine. And I also
Speaker 1: think the Russians will be like Wood. The one tough
Speaker 1: uticities on the million people, you'd say, is he's working.
Speaker 1: Did they throw where you there? You go Multiland and
Speaker 1: pertained like oh if the controlled stud detrial vaccine boom
Speaker 1: in ze m, now you're good. That's the plan. They're
Speaker 1: gonna be like, oh, we're gonna be We're gonna start
Speaker 1: making vaccine now as soon as they get in, and
Speaker 1: I'll start making it and get ready to go. So
Speaker 1: now for Russia, you might think, okay, well, we're so
Speaker 1: far ahead of Russia and we'll probably be selling them
Speaker 1: vaccine very soon or sending it to them or whatever.
Speaker 1: What about China? All along, China has been leveraging this
Speaker 1: crisis for its own purposes, trying to use this as
Speaker 1: a means of getting further or of getting further along
Speaker 1: than other countries faster, because there is there is huge
Speaker 1: economic advantage. Think about what a country can do with
Speaker 1: its economy turned on and functioning at full blast, six
Speaker 1: with six months lead time on another economy. All that
Speaker 1: production and all that market share, all that wealth creation.
Speaker 1: Right when you start to look at this in the
Speaker 1: balance of powers around the world and you see what
Speaker 1: the Chinese government has done, there's certainly going to want
Speaker 1: to get their population vaccinated and back to work and
Speaker 1: manufacturing and doing all those things before other countries do.
Speaker 1: There's going to be a race to see who can
Speaker 1: get this done the fastest, because then that country will
Speaker 1: have a tremendous economic advantage and who knows, you know,
Speaker 1: who knows how long it will last and what that
Speaker 1: will lead to. But there's a there are strategic, national
Speaker 1: security and just great power implications of getting the vaccine
Speaker 1: first and fastest. We'll see. Thanks for listening to the
Speaker 1: Remember to subscribe on Apple podcasts, the iHeart radio app,
Speaker 1: or wherever you get your podcasts. Since we're talking about hacking.
Speaker 1: We've also got to spend a couple of minutes here
Speaker 1: addressing a pretty pretty crazy moment in time yesterday when
Speaker 1: some of the biggest Twitter accounts in the world with
Speaker 1: tens of millions of followers, we're part of a massive
Speaker 1: hack scheme you had. I'm just trying to think of something. Oh,
Speaker 1: here we go. Here the names you had, the Twitter
Speaker 1: accounts of Bill Gates, Jeff Bezos, Elon Musk, and Joe
Speaker 1: Biden all hacked and putting out this this request for bitcoin.
Speaker 1: I mean, it was a very obvious, you know, it was, Hello,
Speaker 1: this is Joe Biden, and I want to give back.
Speaker 1: Please add some bitcoin into my bitcoin wallet below, and
Speaker 1: I will give you even more bitcoin in return. I mean,
Speaker 1: this is not a sophisticated a sophisticated ploy in that sense.
Speaker 1: I mean, to hack into this stuff seems pretty sophisticated.
Speaker 1: But sure enough they estimate that one hundred thousand dollars
Speaker 1: was donate, was donated, was was fraudulently acquired through this
Speaker 1: through this mechanism. So because I remember seeing this, I
Speaker 1: was like, oh, come on, Joe Biden's Twitter account has
Speaker 1: really been hacked. Oh yes, and Bezos and Bill Gates
Speaker 1: and Elon Musk, these huge, huge names. This is a reminder.
Speaker 1: I mean, you know, the President does communications on Twitter
Speaker 1: that even have legal implications. If the President says someone's
Speaker 1: pardoned on Twitter, is that person pardoned? For example? You
Speaker 1: know the this it's all official archive, it's all part
Speaker 1: of the you know, official archive now and people look
Speaker 1: at this and it can direct the whole news cycle.
Speaker 1: We it's cybersecurity on things like this have enormous implications.
Speaker 1: It could have Think about this, what would have happened
Speaker 1: if someone had hacked into Elon Musk's Twitter account Let's
Speaker 1: just say, which we know they had access to it.
Speaker 1: They did into it, and instead of saying give me
Speaker 1: one hundred thousand, give me bitcoin, which was, as I said,
Speaker 1: really not a particularly clever approach, but it worked to
Speaker 1: some degree, give me bitcoin, I'm Elon Musk. What if
Speaker 1: Elon Musk as someone had hacked the Twitter account and
Speaker 1: he had said, I can't take it anymore. My whole
Speaker 1: company is built on a fraud. We've been cooking the
Speaker 1: books for six months. I'm sorry, you know, I'm going
Speaker 1: to go off into the woods. Now. What if someone
Speaker 1: had hacked into his account? And tweeted that out the
Speaker 1: stock price would look like it had fallen off a cliff.
Speaker 1: I mean, the the amount of wealth that would change hands.
Speaker 1: I mean billions of billions of dollars. I mean that's you.
Speaker 1: You would see nothing like that, And how do you
Speaker 1: stop that? And what do you Also? What do you
Speaker 1: tell people that sold their stock in a panic and
Speaker 1: maybe you know, either took a loss on it or
Speaker 1: no longer own it and now hit you know, I'm
Speaker 1: just that that's just one example. That's an obvious example.
Speaker 1: What if someone had hacked into President Trump's Twitter account
Speaker 1: and had said, you know, we are I regret to
Speaker 1: inform the American people we're under attack or you know,
Speaker 1: a big, a big terrorist attack. I'm using this platform
Speaker 1: to let you know a big terrorist attack is going
Speaker 1: to hit New York City in a matter of hours. Everyone,
Speaker 1: you know, please evacuate. You know. Yeah, some people would
Speaker 1: look at this and say, I mean kind of you know,
Speaker 1: and they're the administration would put another statement, but there
Speaker 1: would be people running for the exits, and I mean
Speaker 1: a lot of them. So these companies, these social media
Speaker 1: platforms that we usually think of, you know, this stuff
Speaker 1: really started out for people to. I mean, Facebook really
Speaker 1: started out so guys could see what pretty girls were
Speaker 1: in their class in college. That's just the truth. I
Speaker 1: started out in at Amherst and there was something called
Speaker 1: the Facebook that they gave us. It was an actual
Speaker 1: book of face photos of all of your classmates. And
Speaker 1: that's how the idea came to Mark Zuckerberg for Facebook.
Speaker 1: So I remember I had that, and my school was
Speaker 1: one of the earlier ones to have this this online
Speaker 1: you know thing called the Facebook. I remember it was
Speaker 1: the Facebook at the time, and that's you know that
Speaker 1: this is what brought about this social media revolution. But
Speaker 1: we usually think of social media as you know, cat
Speaker 1: cat videos. I posted a photo of Telula today. See
Speaker 1: if you follow me on Instagram at buck Sexton, you'll
Speaker 1: see these things. But if you don't, you're missing out
Speaker 1: on some good to Lula content. And so, you know,
Speaker 1: I see all this stuff that people are posting, and
Speaker 1: you usually think of it's okay communication For journalists, it's
Speaker 1: a way for them to virtue signal to each other
Speaker 1: and bicker with each other and do the pylons about
Speaker 1: who's not woken up. But it also is a mass
Speaker 1: communication device. I mean Twitter for the president is kind
Speaker 1: of like a PA system from the president in the
Speaker 1: Oval office to the whole world, and it's instantaneous and
Speaker 1: there's no filter. So I just think it was a
Speaker 1: reminder for many of us how powerful these different, these
Speaker 1: different digital social media platforms have become. I mean, they
Speaker 1: can change world events. And then when you start to
Speaker 1: also think about how there are admins in Twitter and
Speaker 1: Twitter confirmed this that the the way that this social
Speaker 1: engineering hack worked. They didn't go after the specific they
Speaker 1: didn't go after the accounts directly. They got access to
Speaker 1: people who work for Twitter. They target people who work
Speaker 1: for Twitter who had access to these accounts. So you
Speaker 1: got to remember that there are human beings who work
Speaker 1: at Twitter who have full access, the total and complete
Speaker 1: ability to go into the Twitter accounts of the most
Speaker 1: powerful people in the world and write whatever they want
Speaker 1: and see whatever they want. That's did we ever really
Speaker 1: think about that? You know, there are people who can
Speaker 1: see you know whatever. Yeah, sure, maybe they It would
Speaker 1: be a little too obvious to go looking at Donald
Speaker 1: Trump's DMS. I bet that's interesting. WHOA But I bet
Speaker 1: if you if you were to think about this, you know,
Speaker 1: Twitter as the ability I mean they've effectively created the
Speaker 1: largest surveillance the largest self induced surveillance operation and history.
Speaker 1: Same thing with Facebook, all your stuff you're putting there,
Speaker 1: all stuff. Yeah, they're monetizing your data. There's that privacy violation,
Speaker 1: But ultimately, there are also people in the in the
Speaker 1: back end of these websites who can see everything you do,
Speaker 1: who knew every click you've made, every message you've sent,
Speaker 1: and when you're talking about you know, corporate or political leadership,
Speaker 1: there are there are some real there are some real
Speaker 1: implications for all this, my friends. So they apparently got
Speaker 1: control back. I think all the blue checks for a while.
Speaker 1: I wasn't on Twitter when this happened, but all the
Speaker 1: blue checks got kicked off for a bit, or that
Speaker 1: they shut down blue check Twitter, which means when you're
Speaker 1: verified fancy or verify Twitter. Um, I got a blue check,
Speaker 1: you know, NBD. But now it's all back. Now it's
Speaker 1: all back. I got to watch this stuff. Our whole
Speaker 1: world especially, and as we're getting used to being a
Speaker 1: lockdown and all this stuff, you see the world is
Speaker 1: just zeros, and the world is controlled by zeros and ones.
Speaker 1: Now you're in the freedom heart. This is the buck
Speaker 1: Sexton Show podcast. I don't have any intention of budding
Speaker 1: any heads. If we but any heads, it's going to
Speaker 1: be over the safety of our children. You know, my
Speaker 1: whole purpose in politics are the three most important issues
Speaker 1: facing the Congress Our children, our children, our children. And
Speaker 1: that's where I bud heads. That's the hill I fight on.
Speaker 1: I just I just can't care. Hey, I care about
Speaker 1: the children, the children, the children. It's it's like a
Speaker 1: record that has skipped the children. How many times have
Speaker 1: I told you that this is Nancy Pelosi's favorite ploy
Speaker 1: is this is her favorite thing. I just I just care.
Speaker 1: It's about the children. Yeah, anytime any politician says it's
Speaker 1: for your safety or it's for the children, ask more questions.
Speaker 1: That's a rule. Ask more questions. What really for the children?
Speaker 1: How is shutting down schools, Nancy? If you epic fraud,
Speaker 1: how is shutting down schools for the children When children
Speaker 1: are at almost zero, almost zero risk of dying from
Speaker 1: or even getting severely ill. Right with adults, we look
Speaker 1: at deaths and mortalities, and that's the single most important metric,
Speaker 1: But there's also hospitalizations. When when I say children are
Speaker 1: at almost zero risk from COVID. I don't mean they're
Speaker 1: at zero risk of just at zero risk of dying
Speaker 1: or almost zero substantially than the flu, which we consider
Speaker 1: to be an acceptable risk for children to be in
Speaker 1: school and have for the last hundred years. Okay, so
Speaker 1: it's effectively zero risk of dying. And then you add
Speaker 1: to that they're at also effectively zero risk of hospitalization
Speaker 1: or serious illness. So what is the problem for kids?
Speaker 1: Aren't schools essential businesses? So to speak? We can tell
Speaker 1: people who work in grocery stores and truckers, God bless
Speaker 1: you across the country. You got to do your job.
Speaker 1: But teachers don't have to do their job. Why is
Speaker 1: that if a teacher is in a high risk category
Speaker 1: fight because of age or health concern, that teacher should
Speaker 1: be they should be special accommodations made for that teacher
Speaker 1: to teach from home and wait until they're comfortable, or
Speaker 1: there's a vaccine, or whatever the case may be. If
Speaker 1: you're a teacher and you're under forty, which a vast
Speaker 1: majority of K through twelve teachers are, guess what, go teach.
Speaker 1: You're gonna be fine. You're gonna be just as fine
Speaker 1: as you would be going into school yearn and year
Speaker 1: out where kids can get other diseases. You know, kids
Speaker 1: can be vectors. Kids can be vectors for example of
Speaker 1: influenza there, so they're at almost no risk of spreading it,
Speaker 1: almost no risk of hospitalization, and almost no risk of dying.
Speaker 1: But we have to keep being told by complete and
Speaker 1: income poops like Pelosi that it's about children. It is
Speaker 1: not about the children. It's about everything but the children. Unfortunately,
Speaker 1: it's very, very frustrating. What's Lindsey Graham doing these days?
Speaker 1: Is he out there telling us all about how he
Speaker 1: wants to He's gonna get accountability and he's gonna he's
Speaker 1: gonna get to the bottom of it. You know, has
Speaker 1: he been on Fox News in five minutes? Because if not,
Speaker 1: that's the longest He hasn't been on Fox in a
Speaker 1: long time. What exactly is Lindsey Graham doing? Oh, he
Speaker 1: doesn't like when anyone is criticizing the vouch, that's for sure.
Speaker 1: Play clip eighteen. Well, here's what I said about doctor Fouci.
Speaker 1: He's been around a long time. It's one of the
Speaker 1: smartest people I know. Has he been right all the time? No,
Speaker 1: we don't have a doctor Fauci problem. We need to
Speaker 1: be focusing on doing things that get us to where
Speaker 1: we need to go. So I have all the respect
Speaker 1: in the world for doctor Fauci. I think any effort
Speaker 1: to undermine him is not going to be productive. Quite frankly,
Speaker 1: is it undermining to point out that the vouch is
Speaker 1: out there and he's making all these prognosticated do this,
Speaker 1: do that, don't do this, don't do that. I'm here,
Speaker 1: I'm a doctor. You gotta listen to me. It's all
Speaker 1: about the social distance. Six feet five feet, three feet
Speaker 1: one foot. Who knows, but let's say six six and
Speaker 1: nice round number. You know, you get six eggs, half
Speaker 1: a dozen, and you get six cookies. That's a lot
Speaker 1: of cookies. But they're good. I like cookies. So you know,
Speaker 1: I'm not telling you what to do. I'm just telling
Speaker 1: you do what I say, or you're probably gonna die.
Speaker 1: That's that's that is that is that too much to ask?
Speaker 1: Do what I say, or you and your grandparents are
Speaker 1: gonna die. That's that's the fact. That's the Fauci way.
Speaker 1: We're not allowed to ask questions, allowed to say why
Speaker 1: why are we still listening to this guy about this?
Speaker 1: Why haven't I heard him talk about her immunity. Why
Speaker 1: haven't I heard him address this theory that I'm seeing
Speaker 1: proposed by doctors, including doctor Yonidas at Stanford University Medical School,
Speaker 1: who is one of the most revered epidemiologist in the
Speaker 1: world who's always talking about not just the the He
Speaker 1: was a big early voice on the fatality rate issue,
Speaker 1: but also on on you know, how we can deal
Speaker 1: with this and how shutdowns are counterproductive and crazy. It's crazy.
Speaker 1: You're not stopping the virus. The virus spreads, and once
Speaker 1: it's spread, then you shut down, and then you're just
Speaker 1: dealing with the virus that's already in the community. It's
Speaker 1: too late, you know. And the Princess Cruise Ship, which
Speaker 1: you would think would have been a perfect I mean,
Speaker 1: it's effectively a floating peatree dish. I know, it's a
Speaker 1: horrible thing to think about, but it's true. And that
Speaker 1: cruise ship you had. Everyone kept looking at the fatality rate,
Speaker 1: and doctor Unitis at Stanford did that. He looked at
Speaker 1: the fatality rate and the cruise ship and figured out
Speaker 1: that it's considerably lower than what we remember. At one point,
Speaker 1: we were being told it's like three or four percent,
Speaker 1: which is Spanish flu epidemic nineteen eighteen, millions dead. That's
Speaker 1: what we were being told. Two million people in America,
Speaker 1: We're going to die from this. That's what they were
Speaker 1: telling us. But Unitis, I'm not sure I'm pronouncing his
Speaker 1: name right. It sounds like I'm talking about the football guy.
Speaker 1: But it's it's not elitism. He also looked at he
Speaker 1: looked at the Princess Cruise data. There were I think
Speaker 1: the the if memory serves, the infection rate was only
Speaker 1: about twenty percent. So what's more likely that one in
Speaker 1: five people just happen to be without knowing that they
Speaker 1: were even being exposed the virus? You know, mitigating wearing
Speaker 1: a mask, Handwhy no, they weren't doing any of those things,
Speaker 1: So why didn't they get sick. That's where you get
Speaker 1: into built in T cell immunity and the body's natural
Speaker 1: response to pathoges and viruses, where some people may just
Speaker 1: be more susceptible to this than others, and that there
Speaker 1: may already be a much broader immunity out there that
Speaker 1: people have, and maybe it's not a total immunity, but
Speaker 1: it's the body's ability to come into contact with this
Speaker 1: and not have a real infection manifest itself because of
Speaker 1: their immune capabilities. We know that comorbidities make it much worse.
Speaker 1: So if your immune system is weak, we know you're
Speaker 1: in really bad shape if you get this. But if
Speaker 1: your immune system is strong, and particularly if it has
Speaker 1: already come into contact with enough coronaviruses before, again, why
Speaker 1: would only twenty percent I think it was even seventeen
Speaker 1: percent of the Princess Cruise ship overall have been posed
Speaker 1: with COVID nineteen. It's a question that people these are
Speaker 1: the we should think through these things and get answers
Speaker 1: and not just say we're a face diaper or else.
Speaker 1: That's what we're all being told. We're a face diaper
Speaker 1: outside too. Look, you want to wear an inside, I
Speaker 1: get it a little, you know, that's I don't think
Speaker 1: that's to wear this outside all the time in the
Speaker 1: middle of the summer is insane. Marco Rubio was like,
Speaker 1: if you know, why not, it's not a big deal.
Speaker 1: Just do it. Marco Rubio sometimes it's like he's in
Speaker 1: a competition with Maisie Herrono and not in a good
Speaker 1: way for the kind of stuff that he says. You know, Trump,
Speaker 1: it was interesting he backed away, which I guess he
Speaker 1: had to do, but he backed away from the op
Speaker 1: ed I talked to you about yesterday where Peter Navarro
Speaker 1: was talking about the Fouch play Levin. But if they're
Speaker 1: all in the same team, we're all in the same team,
Speaker 1: including doctor Fauci. Have a very good relationship with doctor Fauci,
Speaker 1: and we're all in the same team. We want to
Speaker 1: get rid of this mess that China sent us, So
Speaker 1: everybody's working on the same line that we're doing very well.
Speaker 1: We're doing well in a lot of ways. That our
Speaker 1: country is coming back very strong. When you look at
Speaker 1: those job numbers, We've never had job numbers like we
Speaker 1: have right now, so it's coming back very strong. Okay, Well,
Speaker 1: he made a statement representing himself. He shouldn't be doing
Speaker 1: that now. I have a very good relationship with Anthony
Speaker 1: Anthony A. Trump and Anthony buddies. Look, they're both New
Speaker 1: York guys, so they got that going for them, which
Speaker 1: is nice. But I just think, I just think that
Speaker 1: people need to be willing to ask their own questions
Speaker 1: at this point because the public health experts just keep
Speaker 1: saying the same thing and it doesn't work. It hasn't worked.
Speaker 1: Wear I'm asks, mitigate stay home, ruin the economy, get
Speaker 1: Biden elected. I mean, that's really what we're being told
Speaker 1: all the time. I'm I'm done with it. I've had enough.
Speaker 1: I spent months wearing a mask all the time here
Speaker 1: in New York while people were getting sick everywhere, all
Speaker 1: over the place, and now they're just saying, oh, if
Speaker 1: we I'm hearing this the CDC director saying, wear a
Speaker 1: mask for two months and we'll be past this. I
Speaker 1: promise you, if we had one hund mask compliance, you
Speaker 1: would not be able to statistically show how it worked.
Speaker 1: You won't be You will not be able to prove
Speaker 1: that masks are the reason that this thing has gone away.
Speaker 1: That's my assessment. I should say, thanks for listening to
Speaker 1: The Buses Show podcast. Remember to subscribe on Apple podcasts,
Speaker 1: the iHeartRadio app, or wherever you get your podcasts. All Right, everybody,
Speaker 1: first time on the show. But I feel like I've
Speaker 1: known this guy already for years, familiar with his work.
Speaker 1: I love his stuff online. Kurt Schlichter is with us now.
Speaker 1: He's an Army veteran columnists at townhall dot com and
Speaker 1: also author of a new book twenty one Biggest Lies
Speaker 1: about Donald Trump and you out now, Kurt. Welcome to
Speaker 1: the freedom of my man. Hey man, thanks for having me.
Speaker 1: It's about time. So you're out in California. Let's start
Speaker 1: with this. California is the place that always gets left
Speaker 1: off the list when the Democrats are complaining about how
Speaker 1: bad COVID is right now in Florida and Texas. Somehow,
Speaker 1: particularly California is just always absent from the list. We
Speaker 1: know that Governor Newsom has scaled you guys back to
Speaker 1: no indoor really no indoor anything right now other than
Speaker 1: just shopping for food. How's it going out there? And
Speaker 1: are people freaked out or does this seem like overkill
Speaker 1: even to the lib population. I think I think a
Speaker 1: lot of people are done with this nonsense. Buck. You know,
Speaker 1: I'm just basically living my luck. I'm a lawyer, so
Speaker 1: I'm an essential service, so I could be in my
Speaker 1: palatial corner office. But you know, the guys who really
Speaker 1: get hurt are the people just starting out, Folks you
Speaker 1: know who work in food service, Folks who work at
Speaker 1: movie theaters as sort of thing. And it's you know,
Speaker 1: it's a damn shame and all the scared, freaked out
Speaker 1: chardonnay swelling house wise who have nothing to fill their
Speaker 1: empty lives with. The uh you know, panic about structural
Speaker 1: and racism and uh mildly effective and dangerous pathogens are
Speaker 1: going to town and it's it doesn't hurt down because
Speaker 1: they've got plenty of dough, because their husbands can work
Speaker 1: from home. What it does is it hurts regular people
Speaker 1: who work for a living, and it really it's really obnoxious.
Speaker 1: Is there is there any pushback? Are you seeing people
Speaker 1: finally start to say, you know, are you first of all,
Speaker 1: are the beaches open out there? What's going on? Well, look,
Speaker 1: I haven't seen the beaches closed. Gyms are supposed to
Speaker 1: be closed, but nobody's doing that. Restaurants are just building
Speaker 1: now out into the literally like parking lots and streets,
Speaker 1: so that now you're outside. It's it's it's a joke.
Speaker 1: I had I had dinner last night and my favorite
Speaker 1: at my favorite French restaurant in New York, and and
Speaker 1: they've had and I know the I know the owners,
Speaker 1: you know, I've I've known them for for a while,
Speaker 1: and they've based it's like you are eating because they're not.
Speaker 1: They're not really sidewalk cafes. So what they're they're making
Speaker 1: people do in New York is just take your tables
Speaker 1: that were inside and just spread them out on the
Speaker 1: New York City sidewalk. I mean, and they're ways spread out,
Speaker 1: and it's like people are walking past you as you're
Speaker 1: eating dinner. This is this is what we've been reduced to. Now. Yeah,
Speaker 1: I mean, it's it's just it's silly. It's all theater,
Speaker 1: you know, you know, the whole mask thing is all theater.
Speaker 1: Can tell you why why do you think masks are
Speaker 1: Because I've been saying that too, and I get people
Speaker 1: who are saying, fuck, why don't symbol? Why don't you
Speaker 1: like masks? I'm like, it's political, guys, it doesn't help you. Look,
Speaker 1: I think it's Look, there are really there are sick
Speaker 1: people out there who to protect themselves, protect them And
Speaker 1: if your business wants me to wear a mask, I
Speaker 1: will either wear a mask because it's your business, or
Speaker 1: I won't go in. That's all reasonable, But let's not
Speaker 1: fool ourselves. You know, if you're in your Prius driving
Speaker 1: down Sunset Boulevard, you're with your with your gagged with
Speaker 1: some high whole song which you're somehow protecting humanity from
Speaker 1: this pestivals. Hey, you're just not exact how much of
Speaker 1: this theater. It's much like the people who insist that
Speaker 1: you conceived that some men men straight. Everybody knows it's bologny.
Speaker 1: You're just supposed to say it's a show solidarity, and
Speaker 1: I'm just not willing to do that. Speaking of Kirchlick,
Speaker 1: you're here. He's got a new book out, twenty one
Speaker 1: Biggest Lies about Donald Trump. So, Kurt, that campaign made
Speaker 1: quite a quite a switch up. Today they have this
Speaker 1: Brad Parscal has been moved into a different role from
Speaker 1: being the head of the Trump reelection campaign. They brought
Speaker 1: in this guy, Stepie In. You have been a vocal
Speaker 1: on this bring us into the campaign stuff because people
Speaker 1: are worried that myself included. The campaign so far hasn't
Speaker 1: been getting a well look, I kind of agree. I
Speaker 1: think that some change was needed. Fortunately, we've got Donald
Speaker 1: Trump who does not famously does not hesitate to tell
Speaker 1: someone when you're fired. I think in the last couple
Speaker 1: of weeks the campaign has seen some real problems. There
Speaker 1: was a lot of pushback. I was one of the
Speaker 1: people pushing about the obnoxious texts we were all getting.
Speaker 1: You know, Donald Trump is very disappointed in you for
Speaker 1: not matching five times a lot by midnight and all
Speaker 1: that garbage. And people are like, look, it's not two
Speaker 1: thousand and two, we are not unsophisticated. Stop treating us
Speaker 1: like idiots. It was really really making the base angry,
Speaker 1: and a lot of us pointed out and it changed
Speaker 1: you about twenty four hours. And then mister Parscale got
Speaker 1: moved back to an area where he was good. I mean,
Speaker 1: remember the Peter principle is you do a great job
Speaker 1: at one thing, then you get moved up to a
Speaker 1: level where you are incommon. Well, he wasn't getting it done.
Speaker 1: I'm an army colonel. If you're not getting it done,
Speaker 1: I put in a guy who does. And that's what
Speaker 1: the President did. He put Parscale back to what he's
Speaker 1: good at. What we need to do. What the campaign
Speaker 1: needs to do is I think, in many ways work
Speaker 1: on some basics. There were complaints that in some states,
Speaker 1: you know, you could get a lawn sign very easily,
Speaker 1: and the middle of Pennsylvania is covered with them, but
Speaker 1: in Florida, even a Max donor would call up and
Speaker 1: not be able to get a lawn sign. Okay, that's
Speaker 1: the basic blocking and tackle of an organization, right, that
Speaker 1: is basic stuff. And if you're not getting the basics done,
Speaker 1: you're not getting the hard stuff done. I'm an organization
Speaker 1: guy who as a battalion commander, as a deputy for
Speaker 1: date commander, I like seeing an organization work, and it
Speaker 1: isn't all glamorous, and it's not all tweeting. A lot
Speaker 1: of it is saying, hey, how many volunteers do we
Speaker 1: have in date counting? Okay, that's not enough? How are
Speaker 1: we going to get more? And how are we going
Speaker 1: to get pizza to them so they can eat? And
Speaker 1: where are the phones going to get set up? A
Speaker 1: lot of it's flip amateurs, talk strategy professionals, look at logistics.
Speaker 1: That's what we need. We need somebody in there who
Speaker 1: does the hard, dirty work of legism and makes stuff happening.
Speaker 1: And I Stepian's got a track record to doing that.
Speaker 1: First feels back at doing what he's good at, and uh,
Speaker 1: I think I think the president's got a great messenger.
Speaker 1: Have a townhall column on how he needs to get aspirational. Now,
Speaker 1: the negative attacks on Biden's wall critical are really a
Speaker 1: supporting act effort. What we need is a main effort
Speaker 1: where they shows people that we have a great future
Speaker 1: ahead if we keep the conservative policies that really set
Speaker 1: us up well for this crisis. Imagine this crisis. Fuck
Speaker 1: if we have been in the Obama doldrums, Yeah, would
Speaker 1: not be good. Kurchlicktor everybody. He's got a book, twenty
Speaker 1: one Biggest Lies about Donald Trump. So let's sell some
Speaker 1: books here, Kurt, what are some book the biggest the
Speaker 1: biggest lies about about Trump? And it always gets me
Speaker 1: upset when people say these lies the very very meant,
Speaker 1: probably the worst lies they ever tell. But go ahead,
Speaker 1: what are the biggest ones? Oh my gosh, Look, there's
Speaker 1: so many. I could have done the twenty one Biggest
Speaker 1: Lies about Donald Trump and you part two Electric Bogaloo,
Speaker 1: but unfortunately you're not allowed to say bogaloo anymore. I'm
Speaker 1: not even sure what means. But I went with the classics,
Speaker 1: including Trump is racist, which was a super big surprise
Speaker 1: to all his friends of all various ethnic groups and
Speaker 1: races right up until the time he ran for president.
Speaker 1: You know, but Donald Trump is probably the most of
Speaker 1: the one are the top fifty most photographed and videotape
Speaker 1: people and all of human history. I think that's probably
Speaker 1: fared to say. And in all that time, they never
Speaker 1: got him on tape talking like say Democrat icon Robert
Speaker 1: Bird talks about minority never once. And you know, there's
Speaker 1: like armies of interns in the NBC vaults going through
Speaker 1: every tape that's ever been made about Donald Trump looking
Speaker 1: for one one word, one insinuation, one epithet, and they
Speaker 1: haven't found it. I can tells she's probably not racist,
Speaker 1: you know, but facts and evidence don't really matter. And
Speaker 1: that's one of the themes of the twenty one Biggest
Speaker 1: Lives about to hold Trump and you doesn't really matter.
Speaker 1: They know it's a lie, or maybe they're stupid and
Speaker 1: don't know it's a lie, or maybe they just think
Speaker 1: we're stupid. But you get to other ones, you'll like
Speaker 1: this because you are you are a three letter agency guy.
Speaker 1: Prump loves putin now and so do you guys, So
Speaker 1: to rescue you conservatives. And all I'm thinking of is,
Speaker 1: you know, I'm literally a veteran of the Cold War.
Speaker 1: I was literally in it. I know how to use
Speaker 1: an Army battalion to defeat a Russian mobile motor rifle regiment.
Speaker 1: I've trained Ukrainian soldiers. I've actually served with Ukrainian soldiers.
Speaker 1: Well to boy, yeah, you know, I find being told
Speaker 1: by a twenty three hour year old Rocks guy who
Speaker 1: can't do a push shop and I'm not hard enough
Speaker 1: on the bear. I find that kind of disconcerned. I like,
Speaker 1: I know exactly who Advox you're talking about it. It's
Speaker 1: everybody at Fox, so well, well please, it's everyone especially
Speaker 1: we can't do a pushop part fan. I mean, look,
Speaker 1: it's nice that thirty five years later they decided to
Speaker 1: get hard on the reds. That's that's great. Welcome to
Speaker 1: the party. The party's long over, we cleaned up, and
Speaker 1: now you're knocking on my door again. But that's okay,
Speaker 1: you know. And of course Joe Biden was a big
Speaker 1: fan of the nuclear Friese movement, which a AGD sponsor
Speaker 1: disinformation and uh yeah, well Biden's been wrong on every
Speaker 1: foreign policy the last forty years. He's almost he's almost
Speaker 1: amazing in his consistency and being wrong, which is fantastic. Exactly.
Speaker 1: He's a Georgia coastan of American foreign policy. You say, Joe,
Speaker 1: what's what? What's your gut tell you? He says, acts
Speaker 1: it go great, let's do why Yep? Kurt Schlichter, everybody
Speaker 1: Townhall columnists check out his book twenty one Biggest Lies
Speaker 1: about Donald Trump and you, Kurt, come back anytime, man,
Speaker 1: Thanks for hanging out with get it hey, thanks for
Speaker 1: hanging out with big and fun. All right, thank you. Kurt.
Speaker 1: Podcast will be out in a couple of hours. That
Speaker 1: will air tonight at eight Eastern and so five pm.
Speaker 1: You're ten excellent rock and roll. You ever get out
Speaker 1: to Cali? Um? Yeah, I do. Under normal circumstances. We
Speaker 1: should definitely get drinks or something to hang out. I
Speaker 1: mean because other than you all, I have her, I
Speaker 1: have a place. Worst case, we're gonna sit on my deck.
Speaker 1: I mean, I've got a slew of beautiful concern conservative
Speaker 1: women in the you know, Hollywood area. But other than that, Yeah,
Speaker 1: we'll hang I think there's six of them. Yeah, I
Speaker 1: think I know them all right, man, we'll talk soon.
Speaker 1: Thanks Kurt them all right, man, thanks for having me.
Speaker 1: Appreciate it anytime You're in the Freedom Mine. This is
Speaker 1: the Buck Sex and Show Podcast. Oh I know we
Speaker 1: talked about the Green New Deal climate change and all
Speaker 1: that insanity a little bit earlier in the show, but
Speaker 1: I meant to do this. I meant to introduce you
Speaker 1: to a producer. Mark. Is this a real commercial? I
Speaker 1: believe yea a burger king commercial about I'm sitting here
Speaker 1: and I'm wondering, how is this possible burger king commercial
Speaker 1: about methane? Yeah? No, this is a real thing. We
Speaker 1: now there are now active campaigns from multinational corporations to
Speaker 1: deal with cow farts and burps. This is this is
Speaker 1: a real commerce. I thought this had to be some
Speaker 1: kind of a send up, some kind of a joke.
Speaker 1: Turns out no, it is. It is not play whatever.
Speaker 1: This plays a clip from the methane The Anti cow
Speaker 1: fart campaign is upon us place sixteen Scott mentions by
Speaker 1: mom thing my coin ain't farting, Must meet men and
Speaker 1: the far open. This is real, folks, the anti cow
Speaker 1: fart campaign. It's a thing. Though. Washington Post reports the
Speaker 1: cows produced excess methin as enzymes breakdown food in their
Speaker 1: digestive system. This methane gets released through burping and flatulence,
Speaker 1: and its environmental impact is significant. Cattle contribute fourteen point
Speaker 1: five percent of the world's global greenhouse gas emissions, and
Speaker 1: methane warms the planet eighty six times more than carbon
Speaker 1: dioxide over ten to twenty years. According to the EPA,
Speaker 1: the livestock industry is directly responsible for approximately a quarter
Speaker 1: of climate change in the industrial age. Gassy cows, everybody,
Speaker 1: they're coming for your gasy cows. Look, this is not
Speaker 1: going to reduce it enough, though. They are going to
Speaker 1: try to take that steak or that burger out of
Speaker 1: your mouth. Just give it time. It's going to happen.
Speaker 1: They can't help themselves. They're that up in your business.
Speaker 1: They're that insistent on controlling every aspect of your life.
Speaker 1: They're going to want to control what you put in
Speaker 1: your mouth, what your dietary needs are. And I got
Speaker 1: to tell you that there was this huge in the
Speaker 1: last few years to create all these burger like substitutes.
Speaker 1: And I even was willing. I tried a couple when
Speaker 1: I lived in DC. I tried a few of them.
Speaker 1: They're not good. They're just not good burgers. And Mark,
Speaker 1: you ever tried those things? I happen't. No, they're very
Speaker 1: you know, beyond meat or better than burger or whatever
Speaker 1: they call these things. My wife really liked the one
Speaker 1: from Actually Burger King, but she doesn't eat red meat
Speaker 1: because he's her stomach. Well that's that's that's like me
Speaker 1: not eating gluten, which is horrible, but unfortunately I can't, right.
Speaker 1: I mean, I wish I could sit there and eat
Speaker 1: French bread and you know, Brion baguettes all day, but
Speaker 1: I would die. So yeah, I mean I get that. Um.
Speaker 1: I mean, look, I guess they're not like inedible, but
Speaker 1: they're pretty they're pretty bad. Yeah, that's sort of like
Speaker 1: a veggie burger. A veggie burger is a fine accoutremle
Speaker 1: to my actual burger burger. As long as you put
Speaker 1: some like melted cheese on it and some mayo and
Speaker 1: things like, you know what I mean, Then then the
Speaker 1: veggie burger is kind of it. So you use the
Speaker 1: veggie burgers are topping to an actual burger, Yeah, pretty much.
Speaker 1: If you if you were you want to eat veggie burger,
Speaker 1: what you do is you put your meat burger and
Speaker 1: you make a veggie burger sandwich of your meat burger.
Speaker 1: You know, carbs like I don't understand veggie veggie patty
Speaker 1: on topping on bottom. I'm just getting creative here, just
Speaker 1: telling you what what I'm up to, kind of the
Speaker 1: kind of things that I do. I'm a man who
Speaker 1: likes to you know, the sandwich from KFC, where it
Speaker 1: was the two pieces of fried chicken with bacon and
Speaker 1: cheese in the middle. Probout what they called that. But
Speaker 1: I remember when I worked at the NYPD there was
Speaker 1: this Italian sandwich place. And this is when I used
Speaker 1: to eat gluten. I didn't know that, you know, I couldn't.
Speaker 1: And they used to go to this Italian sandwich place
Speaker 1: out in Brooklyn and guys would drive like forty five
Speaker 1: minutes to come back with a sandwich and they'd get
Speaker 1: cardboard boxes full of these sandwiches with like you know,
Speaker 1: bragutto and provolo and all the and the sandwiches were incredible.
Speaker 1: You know, a really good sandwich goes a long way.
Speaker 1: I will say, I'm see, this is what happens the
Speaker 1: show I Get I Get Hungry. Where we do we
Speaker 1: do this radio show? We started talking about food. I
Speaker 1: started thinking, I'm like, how many people listening to this
Speaker 1: right now are probably are cooking dinner or sitting down
Speaker 1: at dinner probably a fair amount they're already eating. I
Speaker 1: still have to finish the show before I can eat.
Speaker 1: I want to order barbecue tonight. Now I really am
Speaker 1: thinking out a lot abou all this stuff. All right,
Speaker 1: all right, Oh, there was one one other thing I
Speaker 1: want to get to. Um. This is kind of a
Speaker 1: mulligan round here of things that I was hoping to
Speaker 1: address on the show and hadn't out the time yet.
Speaker 1: I told you yesterday AOC had the and maybe the
Speaker 1: dumbest take possible, the dumbest take imaginable, for why there
Speaker 1: has been a spike in crime in New York City.
Speaker 1: It was kind of it's kind of hard to fathom
Speaker 1: that anybody could come up with this. Who's a person
Speaker 1: in public life, a public figure, But no, it happened.
Speaker 1: And here she is, or rather, here is Governor Cuomo,
Speaker 1: pardon me, responding to AOC's almost incomprehensively stupid analysis of
Speaker 1: why there's a crime spike in New York City. Please
Speaker 1: play fourteen and incorrect. I don't know what she said,
Speaker 1: so I have no comment on what she said. But
Speaker 1: people have theories. An incorrect theory doesn't wind up being
Speaker 1: correct because there's a void and I think we have
Speaker 1: been talking about what's going on. I don't think there
Speaker 1: is one answer, but I think you raised a good
Speaker 1: point last week. I think there are a number of
Speaker 1: contributing factor and you put all those factors together and
Speaker 1: that's what you're seeing going on. It's no one factor,
Speaker 1: and that's why it's a little more complicated. You know,
Speaker 1: in politics, they want to be able to say it's
Speaker 1: just this. It's not just this. There are a number
Speaker 1: of factors. But I don't think, yeah, it is factually
Speaker 1: impossible that somebody committed a crime so they could pay
Speaker 1: their rent. If you can't pay your rent, you cannot
Speaker 1: be evicted right now. Yeah, the only intelligence thing he
Speaker 1: said was the last thing. Everything else you said was crap.
Speaker 1: But anyway, or at least, it's a dodge from the
Speaker 1: fact that we all know why the crime spike is happening.
Speaker 1: So I actually gave Cuomo, gave him too much credit.
Speaker 1: Uh So, Yeah, what he does says he doesn't know
Speaker 1: what AOC says. I'm sure he didn't know, but he
Speaker 1: didn't want to criticize her, of course, because she has
Speaker 1: a bigger Twitter audience. It would crush him, crush him,
Speaker 1: destroy him. All right, Roll Call next. Thanks for listening
Speaker 1: to the Buses and Show podcast. Remember to subscribe on
Speaker 1: Apple Podcast, the iHeartRadio app, or wherever you get your podcasts.
Speaker 1: Team Buck, It's time for Roll Call producer Mark. How
Speaker 1: much would it take if we set up a gofund
Speaker 1: me to have you sing the cow fart song? How
Speaker 1: much money would it require for you to sing that
Speaker 1: on air? It would take a lot of money. But
Speaker 1: you do think it is catchy? I mean it is
Speaker 1: a little catchy. I mean, come on, compared to Baby Shark,
Speaker 1: which one is, it's like on a scale of one
Speaker 1: to baby Shark, which baby Shark is by far at ten,
Speaker 1: maybe even a twenty, it's like a six. You know. Actually,
Speaker 1: I actually realized that Baby Sharks singing on radio should
Speaker 1: be banned by the Geneva Convention because it is a
Speaker 1: form of psychological warfare. Because if I start singing baby
Speaker 1: Shark on this show, you're gonna make why is he
Speaker 1: doing that? It is guaranteed that later today or later tonight,
Speaker 1: at some point you will have it stuck in your head.
Speaker 1: There's there's no way around it. There's nothing you can do.
Speaker 1: It will stick in your brain like this scum that
Speaker 1: gathers around the you know, the orange scum that gathers
Speaker 1: around the edge of the shower stall or you know whatever. Right,
Speaker 1: that's stuff that's you don't talking about. Yes, So I
Speaker 1: actually used to work for my alma mater, being the
Speaker 1: DJ at basketball games, just playing music. And every year
Speaker 1: the women's team has what I Want to Be Day
Speaker 1: or something like that. I think they actually change it
Speaker 1: to Kids in Fitness Day, So they had like ten
Speaker 1: thousand screaming children, elementary school children, and to entertain them,
Speaker 1: I think Baby Shark was played at least four times,
Speaker 1: maybe five. I wanted to shoot myself. I remember the
Speaker 1: instrument of psychological warfare against adults known as Barney the
Speaker 1: Purple Dinosaur, because I tied to babysit for my younger
Speaker 1: siblings sometimes, and that was like, if you wanted the
Speaker 1: kid to just be quiet, you would put on Barney
Speaker 1: the Purple Dinosaur. Does he still exist? I'm sure he does.
Speaker 1: He was scuds on Barney, curing me, insuring again I
Speaker 1: was obsessed with Barney as a child. Oh so you
Speaker 1: knew about bart of course I did. Yeah, that's you're
Speaker 1: you're of the age, that's right. You're like, my you're
Speaker 1: like my siblings age or my youngest one. So yeah,
Speaker 1: that's right, you would have. It was like right around Barney,
Speaker 1: but but before Teletubbies. So like I saw a Teletubbies
Speaker 1: and thought that was weird. I love you, you love
Speaker 1: me weird. I remember, I remember the whole thing. Oh
Speaker 1: my gosh, parents listening to this of a certain age,
Speaker 1: you're like buck stop. I had the stuffed animals and everything.
Speaker 1: Oh yeah, yeah, iro. When I was a kid, it
Speaker 1: was cabbage Patch kids were just the rage and everyone
Speaker 1: loved cabbage Patch kids. That was the thing that was
Speaker 1: really um and also thought, I mean cabbage Patch kids.
Speaker 1: Then you got a little older and a little cooler.
Speaker 1: It was all about ThunderCats, which were human beings kind
Speaker 1: of mixed with a cat that we're wearing, like, you know,
Speaker 1: g strings in these cartoons. The whole thing made no sense.
Speaker 1: But anyway, some of you know what I'm talking about.
Speaker 1: I have no idea what you're talking about. You know,
Speaker 1: I'm just saying sounds like something you find on the
Speaker 1: internet after a night of drinking. The ThunderCats was thunder
Speaker 1: thunder cats. It was it was pretty cool. I was
Speaker 1: a big gi Joe guy though that was my that's
Speaker 1: not surprising. Yeah, of course. All right, Facebook dot com,
Speaker 1: slash Buck Sexton or Team Buck and iHeartMedia dot com
Speaker 1: if you want to email us and remember tomorrow's Friday
Speaker 1: or Producer Mark's favorite day, because it is the day
Speaker 1: that we get to play all your voicemails eight four
Speaker 1: four nine hundred two eight two five eight four four
Speaker 1: nine hundred buck. And Producer Mark loves it when you
Speaker 1: call in and tell him that he he's a grouchy
Speaker 1: snuggle bear. He likes that in the voicemail, so you
Speaker 1: can always say that rouchy snuggle bear. That's a new one. Yeah, yeah,
Speaker 1: we're just trying to see someone's gonna call it at
Speaker 1: say it. You'll have to listen to it. So there
Speaker 1: we go. Eight four four nine hundred two eight two
Speaker 1: five eight four four nine hundred buck. That is the number.
Speaker 1: Please light us up with some wonderful voicemails. We love
Speaker 1: hearing from you guys. We'll play them tomorrow. That's always fun,
Speaker 1: all right, Scott Buck. I download every podcast you offer. However,
Speaker 1: I haven't heard your Kaiservilleham impersonation in a vial. It's
Speaker 1: one of my favorites. Thank your Scott from Orange County, California. Haktongue,
Speaker 1: Scott's you've heard thee kaiser. Kaiser Wilhelm initially started as
Speaker 1: a representation of the person that Bill Deblasio would have
Speaker 1: had to b if he' we are in fact called
Speaker 1: his original name, which was var In Wilhelm. Yeah, guten
Speaker 1: tag so vai In Philhelm born in Massachusetts, the state
Speaker 1: in northeastern United States. Yeah, he became Billy Deblasio because
Speaker 1: he wanted to run for the office. Nine. That's what happened.
Speaker 1: So he's the Kaiser and now the Kaiser. Deblasio was saying,
Speaker 1: you cannot eat the food, you cannot go out the side.
Speaker 1: It is all I want you to do all the time.
Speaker 1: And we all have to say, okay, Kaiser Wilhelm, okay,
Speaker 1: please don't ruin the city anymore than you've already ruined it.
Speaker 1: I never thought one of your ridiculous voices would actually
Speaker 1: teach me something I had no idea about that. You
Speaker 1: didn't know that was a name. Yeah, yeah, Warren Wilhelm,
Speaker 1: think about that. It's a little bit tougher to get
Speaker 1: union guys be like, hey, yeah, who you vote for
Speaker 1: Today Gold with this guy Warren Wilhelm. He was like
Speaker 1: a pith helmet, you know, served his time in the trenches.
Speaker 1: You know, It's like, I don't know, different, different kind
Speaker 1: of deal. I've never heard of a politician having a
Speaker 1: stage name. Interesting, I own a lot of politicians have
Speaker 1: changed their names. Um. Look, I think John Carry's name before.
Speaker 1: I think his family name was originally Cone and then
Speaker 1: it was changed to Carry. Barack Obama went by the
Speaker 1: name as an adult Barry Obama and even at one
Speaker 1: point I believe Barry Satoro when he was younger, but
Speaker 1: definitely Barry. Producer Nick am I one of my he's
Speaker 1: got something for us here? Am I saying something? That's uh,
Speaker 1: that's Bill Clinton, William William Blake. You know I knew that,
Speaker 1: but I had totally I had totally forgotten that one.
Speaker 1: I had totally forgotten that. Yeah, these guys all they
Speaker 1: changed their names, change their names all the time. Um,
Speaker 1: trying to think who else where it was a big
Speaker 1: There's there's definitely one that I'm forgetting that people are
Speaker 1: gonna yell at me later that I'm forgetting. But yeah,
Speaker 1: a lot a lot of politicians have have changed their
Speaker 1: names and um, that's uh, that's just part of it, man.
Speaker 1: It's all branding. It's all branding, all right, Adam Buck,
Speaker 1: you stumble upon a great idea. Each frequent guest needs
Speaker 1: an eighties action hero intro or maybe a wrestling intro
Speaker 1: cage match to see who gets the Undertaker's intro shields.
Speaker 1: High producer Mark, did I stumble onto that idea? I
Speaker 1: think we were talking you, uh, you were talking about
Speaker 1: Randy Savage yesterday, about a Randy that slim gym. Remember that,
Speaker 1: but realistically wouldn't If there was a cage match between
Speaker 1: our guests, Jesse Kelly would win like he's he's the five. Yeah,
Speaker 1: he's the tallest. I don't know. You know, you know
Speaker 1: there there'd be some tough conservative matchups, you know, uh,
Speaker 1: you know on Gino's a big guy and and does
Speaker 1: does grappling training. But you know, you get Seb Gorka
Speaker 1: in there. Doctor g is like the mountain from Game
Speaker 1: of Thrones. He he is so much bigger than you
Speaker 1: realize from seeing him on TV and stuff. Doctor G
Speaker 1: has hands the size of oven mitts. I'm telling you. So,
Speaker 1: you know, the steel cage match of conservative media personalities.
Speaker 1: You'd have some interesting matchups for sure. Um, but yeah, no, Yeah,
Speaker 1: Jesse Kelly is like six foot nine, but he's st
Speaker 1: he's you know, he's a slender fellow because he does
Speaker 1: keto of course, so as he likes to show everybody
Speaker 1: his version of keto is a lot of Yeah, but
Speaker 1: it's a lot of Philly cheese steaks, that's his keto. Yeah.
Speaker 1: He's one of those people that eats like a He
Speaker 1: eats like a you know, a human hippopotamus or something
Speaker 1: and never gains a pound. Good job, Jesse Kelly. Yeah, producer, producer,
Speaker 1: Mark and Buck here are like, no more mac and cheese.
Speaker 1: Time to start eating salads another time another day. I'll
Speaker 1: start my my fitness routine soon. Let's see, Kyle Buck.
Speaker 1: I live in California and consult of the state of
Speaker 1: the state based on a recent neighborhood walk, bum camps everywhere,
Speaker 1: human fecal matter on the sidewalk near my house, and
Speaker 1: someone wearing a face mask outdoors but pulling it down
Speaker 1: to take a hit on his joint. Yeah, of course.
Speaker 1: But I can't go to a restaurant or have a
Speaker 1: drink at a bar because those are public health risks.
Speaker 1: I'm moving out of state soon and won't miss it.
Speaker 1: It's a beautiful place to live, made miserable by many
Speaker 1: of the people who live here, and definitely by those
Speaker 1: who govern. Oh, Kyle, I believe that for sure. Uh yeah, man,
Speaker 1: it's California is an amazing state. I just I wish
Speaker 1: the Conservatives had come up with a plan to take
Speaker 1: to well. It used to be republic people forget this,
Speaker 1: and Ronald Reagan was the governor of California. California used
Speaker 1: to be consistently, you know, in an election after election,
Speaker 1: used to go for the GOP. And I wasn't really
Speaker 1: until the nineties and huge waves of predominantly illegal immigration
Speaker 1: that the states started to flip um and and now
Speaker 1: it's just a it's a Democrat ultra stronghold. I mean
Speaker 1: it's not even not even close. It's just a shame
Speaker 1: because Republicans we need one. Look, we've got Texas, but
Speaker 1: they're trying to take Texas. We really need one large
Speaker 1: population blue state to to go our way. I mean,
Speaker 1: I think the answer is Florida. The producer Mark will
Speaker 1: be happy to hear that we need we need you know,
Speaker 1: a half a million you know just redd as can
Speaker 1: be Republicans from states that are forever lost New York
Speaker 1: and California to just flood down to Florida, register and vote.
Speaker 1: That's that's the real strategy, and I'm Siah. We should
Speaker 1: do this. He bows. Florida is great, no state income taxes, obviously,
Speaker 1: fantastic weather, a lot of upside. There a lot of
Speaker 1: upside close to the Caribbean. Let's not make the housing
Speaker 1: market go up before we move. That's a good point.
Speaker 1: Come on, don't do this until, producer Mark I have
Speaker 1: moved first. Everybody, let us find houses first thing you can. Indeed,
Speaker 1: all right, Zach Buck, I thought you'd find this funny.
Speaker 1: I am door dashing for some extra cash, and I
Speaker 1: always listen to your show while I do it. Anyways,
Speaker 1: on one order, I went into a restaurant without a
Speaker 1: mask and the manager yelled at me for not wearing one.
Speaker 1: My response was, do you expect your patrons to eat
Speaker 1: with their masks? On two, I'm in the store for
Speaker 1: five seconds to pick up an order. He had no response.
Speaker 1: Explains lockdown libs perfectly as always shields high well, Zach,
Speaker 1: good for you man, stand in your ground. You're one
Speaker 1: hundred percent right. What kind of dumb assery is that?
Speaker 1: You know? You go in there for five seconds? Just
Speaker 1: this is like when I walked through my lobby of
Speaker 1: my very tall apartment building in New York, which is
Speaker 1: full of people. I walked through the lobby for five
Speaker 1: seconds and then outside. I don't have to wear a mask.
Speaker 1: I want to put a mask on for a five
Speaker 1: second walk, please. I want to tell these lockdown libs
Speaker 1: go blankety blanking blank your blank blank blank family show.
Speaker 1: So I gotta keep it clean. M Patrick buck PS
Speaker 1: four suggestion The Last of Us, The Last of Us
Speaker 1: two amazing story post pandemic. Look for the similarities written
Speaker 1: into this story well before any COVID great game, better story. Okay, Patrick,
Speaker 1: thank you producer Mark Ry. He's talking about Yeah, I've
Speaker 1: heard of the game. It's a very very popular game.
Speaker 1: Have you ever played it? No, remember, I play sports games.
Speaker 1: I will tell you The Snow Princess and I at
Speaker 1: dinner recently, I brought up the possibility, specifically brought to
Speaker 1: my attention by both my two fantastic patriotic red meat
Speaker 1: eating brothers, that we were all going to that I
Speaker 1: was going to get PS four So we could all
Speaker 1: play Call of Duty together. And also Jesse Kelly has
Speaker 1: been saying that he wants me to do this so
Speaker 1: that we can play on the same team and or
Speaker 1: try to kill each other playing against each other in
Speaker 1: Call of Duty and then talk smack over headsets, which
Speaker 1: obviously would be a lot of fun. And I brought
Speaker 1: this up the Snow Princess, and then she went on
Speaker 1: this whole thing about you have a lot of things
Speaker 1: that you're trying to do and accomplish, like get back
Speaker 1: into shape, and like a multi podcast and a hundred
Speaker 1: other things. Maybe setting up an addictive entertainment machine in
Speaker 1: your own home as opposed to at least only at
Speaker 1: your brother's place that will take hours and hours out
Speaker 1: of your life. Maybe that's not what the Team Buck
Speaker 1: really wants you to be doing right now. She didn't
Speaker 1: say it in quite that way, but that was pretty
Speaker 1: much the message, and I gotta say a message was
Speaker 1: received on that one for now. I was like, yeah,
Speaker 1: it's just gonna make things harder if I get one.
Speaker 1: Do you You don't have one, right, Producer, Mark, of
Speaker 1: course I do. What do you think I do all
Speaker 1: day when I'm not working? You have a PS four. Yeah,
Speaker 1: I do. I not know this. Yeah, I'm alone all week. Yeah,
Speaker 1: because I know missus Mark is working over at the
Speaker 1: working at her job. Yeah, what's your favorite game? I
Speaker 1: usually rotate throughout the sports game. Right now, I'm playing NHL.
Speaker 1: I'll play the NBA game Madden. Yeah, I'm gonna break down.
Speaker 1: It's so much fun. I'm gonna break down. Probably, just
Speaker 1: don't tell the snow princess not to hide it from
Speaker 1: her somehow. I'm gonna put it in the cabinet and
Speaker 1: don't tell me to tell her it's like part of
Speaker 1: my radio gear or something, and hope that you know,
Speaker 1: I'm gonna like put a different cover on it or
Speaker 1: I don't have to figure out something. Yeah, exactly, I'm
Speaker 1: gonna have to keep it with my radio gear and
Speaker 1: be like don't touch that, you know whatever, whatever anyone
Speaker 1: goes near my radio stufthing like, don't touch that. So
Speaker 1: I'll have to just do that and hope that she'll
Speaker 1: figure it out real fast. Though that's not good. Any
Speaker 1: I'll think of something. Um, yeah, I think I think
Speaker 1: that might have to happen. Producer, Nick, do you have
Speaker 1: a producer? Nick? Put me on the on the text
Speaker 1: or do you have a PS four? He's got kids? Man,
Speaker 1: that that means that he's more likely to have a
Speaker 1: Nintendo Switch because of the Nope, he does not. He
Speaker 1: does not have kids. Like time's the thing, man, Like,
Speaker 1: I'm at some point I'm just gonna be like, Yeah,
Speaker 1: I'm done with trying to save the country and I'm
Speaker 1: just gonna find a nice, warm place with a view
Speaker 1: of some water in Florida and just play PS play
Speaker 1: PS four all day and cook and read books and
Speaker 1: be left alone. Oh yeah, well, we'll have a nice
Speaker 1: outdoor setup maybe on our projector next to a pool
Speaker 1: there we go, and a smoker outside somewhere as well.
Speaker 1: I'm into it, perfect into it. You're in the freedom. Huh.
Speaker 1: This is the Buck Sexton Show podcast. More road call, everybody.
Speaker 1: Remember to go to Bucksexton dot com. I'm gonna be
Speaker 1: posting a weekend review story there where I just kind
Speaker 1: of tell you what I think is the biggest takeaways
Speaker 1: from the week. So we'll have a it'll be an
Speaker 1: editorial that's going up tomorrow. So please go to Bucksexen
Speaker 1: dot com and uh, yeah, good things there. Easy to
Speaker 1: listen to podcast. They're not too we have a new producer. Mark.
Speaker 1: Have you seen this? We have a new a new button.
Speaker 1: When you go to buckxxen dot com. You just you
Speaker 1: you open the page and there's a plugin play. You
Speaker 1: just press play. Wait is it up yet? Or do
Speaker 1: I get ahead of us? I might? I might be
Speaker 1: ahead of things here. Darnet. It's gonna be there soon.
Speaker 1: I mean there is yeah, I mean there's always a
Speaker 1: place right on the homepage. No, there's it. But there's
Speaker 1: an auto play. Now that's gonna be All you have
Speaker 1: to do is press play on the big anyway, you
Speaker 1: really shouldn't make sure these things are enacted before you
Speaker 1: say them on the radio. It's gonna be soon, though,
Speaker 1: It's gonna be soon, folks, trust me, Trust me, all right,
Speaker 1: Dan buck Well, I appreciate that you referenced the Asian
Speaker 1: American experience as a counter to the BLM leftist narrative.
Speaker 1: As in Asian American from the Garden State, New Jersey.
Speaker 1: I should point out that it's not that simple. You
Speaker 1: and I around the same age. At the messages we
Speaker 1: received growing up were quite different. Every step of the way.
Speaker 1: I was told I had to be better, much better
Speaker 1: than my non Asian counterparts to attain the same success.
Speaker 1: As it turns out that message was correct. The Harvard
Speaker 1: lawsuit from rejected Asian applicants shows it, simply put, I
Speaker 1: utterly destroyed every standardized test I ever took, and you'd
Speaker 1: be astonished at the colleges that didn't accept me. And
Speaker 1: just for good measure, it did not matter that I
Speaker 1: was All League on my track team. Well, Damnon, thanks
Speaker 1: for running in and yeah, I know what you're saying
Speaker 1: is true, and I know it's true, and I know
Speaker 1: I went to a scholarship school, scholarship private high school
Speaker 1: in New York where everyone goes for free, and I'm
Speaker 1: the Asian students in my class. We're all very tense
Speaker 1: about their college application experience because they knew that even
Speaker 1: even with you know, sixteen hundred boards and a straight
Speaker 1: A average, they were going to get into a great school,
Speaker 1: but they might not get into Harvard. So and I
Speaker 1: knew people like that. But yeah, no, you're you're correct
Speaker 1: on that, Dan, So thank you for writing in and
Speaker 1: bringing that to our attention. Thanks for listening to the show. Team.
Speaker 1: That's gonna be it for today Tomorrow We're gonna have
Speaker 1: a great show. A lot of fun. Make sure you
Speaker 1: tune in. Pass the Buck. Please get a friend, please
Speaker 1: please get a friend to listen to the podcast of
Speaker 1: The Buck Sexton Show this week until next time. She's high.