WEBVTT - Is the middle class going extinct?

0:00:01.000 --> 0:00:04.360
<v Speaker 1>From UFOs two, ghosts and government cover ups. History is

0:00:04.440 --> 0:00:08.000
<v Speaker 1>riddled with unexplained events. You can turn back now or

0:00:08.119 --> 0:00:16.239
<v Speaker 1>learn the stuff they don't want you to now. Hello,

0:00:16.320 --> 0:00:19.040
<v Speaker 1>welcome back. My name is Matt and I am Ben,

0:00:19.200 --> 0:00:21.160
<v Speaker 1>and this is stuff they don't want you to know.

0:00:21.760 --> 0:00:24.840
<v Speaker 1>And today, Ben, we're tackling a topic that's gonna hit

0:00:24.960 --> 0:00:27.920
<v Speaker 1>home with you right away. And I can tell I know,

0:00:28.080 --> 0:00:30.400
<v Speaker 1>how can you tell me personally? Or everybody out there

0:00:30.400 --> 0:00:33.840
<v Speaker 1>listening with us, everybody listening, this is something we can

0:00:33.880 --> 0:00:38.080
<v Speaker 1>all identify with, well, not all of us, but we've

0:00:38.080 --> 0:00:41.479
<v Speaker 1>probably heard about it. Perhaps are robotic listeners who loved,

0:00:41.760 --> 0:00:44.640
<v Speaker 1>uh love that episode, by the way, perhaps they can't

0:00:44.640 --> 0:00:47.159
<v Speaker 1>identify with it now. Matt, I have to say that

0:00:47.200 --> 0:00:49.040
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people before we get started, a lot

0:00:49.080 --> 0:00:53.279
<v Speaker 1>of people don't know that you have some amazing voices

0:00:53.440 --> 0:00:56.160
<v Speaker 1>under your belt. Yes, in your throat. You get the

0:00:56.200 --> 0:00:59.440
<v Speaker 1>gist of what I'm saying. Yes, they exist mostly inside

0:00:59.440 --> 0:01:03.080
<v Speaker 1>my throat. Some of them are in my head. Um Ever,

0:01:03.280 --> 0:01:06.920
<v Speaker 1>every once in a while they coincide. So we did, uh,

0:01:07.120 --> 0:01:09.640
<v Speaker 1>we did the opening for this episode a couple of

0:01:09.680 --> 0:01:14.480
<v Speaker 1>times today because Matt, you were doing brilliant public radio

0:01:14.560 --> 0:01:18.240
<v Speaker 1>voice that sounds really good, and I was I was

0:01:18.319 --> 0:01:23.600
<v Speaker 1>just messing up in ira glass impression. So that's exactly

0:01:23.640 --> 0:01:25.760
<v Speaker 1>what it was. I was trying to picture what it was.

0:01:26.560 --> 0:01:29.960
<v Speaker 1>N Well, if it's a good impression, then you just know. Well, look,

0:01:30.040 --> 0:01:32.880
<v Speaker 1>I haven't been listening to as much this American life

0:01:32.920 --> 0:01:36.759
<v Speaker 1>as I probably should be. Well, we're big fans, but

0:01:36.840 --> 0:01:40.000
<v Speaker 1>we also want to tell you this, listeners, just so

0:01:40.120 --> 0:01:42.240
<v Speaker 1>that you know that maybe you can write to Matt

0:01:42.360 --> 0:01:46.440
<v Speaker 1>asking him to do some voices and uh maybe maybe

0:01:46.480 --> 0:01:50.560
<v Speaker 1>he will because I can't persuade you did do them. No,

0:01:51.040 --> 0:01:53.000
<v Speaker 1>you would be hard pressed to persuade me to do this.

0:01:53.480 --> 0:01:56.320
<v Speaker 1>The voices are usually things I do I don't know,

0:01:56.400 --> 0:02:00.000
<v Speaker 1>in the in the shower, in theater class in ninth grade,

0:02:00.360 --> 0:02:03.680
<v Speaker 1>in our office after six Yeah, that that's when they

0:02:03.760 --> 0:02:06.120
<v Speaker 1>really come. That's when they kick in. Yeah. I feel

0:02:06.120 --> 0:02:08.240
<v Speaker 1>like I can hear the voices in your head then too.

0:02:08.360 --> 0:02:13.520
<v Speaker 1>Uh So. One thing that I always think about when

0:02:13.720 --> 0:02:18.840
<v Speaker 1>I hear the phrase middle class, right, is I think

0:02:18.880 --> 0:02:21.600
<v Speaker 1>about the what we call in the United States, the

0:02:21.639 --> 0:02:27.040
<v Speaker 1>American dream. Yeah, man, I think about suburbia, two point

0:02:27.040 --> 0:02:32.040
<v Speaker 1>five kids, maybe a dog, sometimes cats. In my case,

0:02:32.080 --> 0:02:35.960
<v Speaker 1>it was cats. Okay, yeah, probably own a car, take

0:02:36.000 --> 0:02:38.880
<v Speaker 1>a vacation once in a while, at least making payments

0:02:38.880 --> 0:02:42.080
<v Speaker 1>on a car. Right, Yeah, What the heck is the

0:02:42.080 --> 0:02:44.880
<v Speaker 1>middle class? So many people in the West talked about it,

0:02:44.919 --> 0:02:48.560
<v Speaker 1>and there's always this big concern. You know, every every

0:02:48.600 --> 0:02:52.600
<v Speaker 1>few years, Uh, some pundit will come out on your

0:02:52.639 --> 0:02:56.240
<v Speaker 1>local radio or television say, the middle class is disappearing.

0:02:56.600 --> 0:02:59.240
<v Speaker 1>What does that mean? What does that mean? Well, let's

0:02:59.240 --> 0:03:01.480
<v Speaker 1>define our terms first of all, as we like to

0:03:01.520 --> 0:03:06.480
<v Speaker 1>do here. Well, the middle class is a financial label

0:03:07.200 --> 0:03:10.359
<v Speaker 1>above most other things, but it's also it kind of

0:03:10.400 --> 0:03:16.280
<v Speaker 1>talks about a lifestyle or refers to a lifestyle about

0:03:16.440 --> 0:03:21.040
<v Speaker 1>what a family of a family unit can afford. We're

0:03:21.080 --> 0:03:25.320
<v Speaker 1>again we're talking about home cars and you know, to

0:03:25.520 --> 0:03:31.200
<v Speaker 1>some extent, education and also even the ability to take vacations. Uh,

0:03:31.240 --> 0:03:35.800
<v Speaker 1>there are like budgeting and saving. It encompasses a lot

0:03:35.800 --> 0:03:38.920
<v Speaker 1>of different things, a little bit like investings. So what then,

0:03:39.800 --> 0:03:44.000
<v Speaker 1>it's not just physical goods the ability to buy physical

0:03:44.080 --> 0:03:49.040
<v Speaker 1>goods like what's that eighties song? Uh? Material World? Yeah,

0:03:49.080 --> 0:03:51.320
<v Speaker 1>do you want me to go into it? How did

0:03:51.320 --> 0:03:54.320
<v Speaker 1>it go? I don't know that I can legally in

0:03:54.320 --> 0:04:01.040
<v Speaker 1>this format, But it's Madonna and I'm yes, I'm checking. Um,

0:04:01.120 --> 0:04:04.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm throwing aside. I hear with our super producer Noel

0:04:04.600 --> 0:04:06.960
<v Speaker 1>Brown on the ones and twos because you guys, Matt

0:04:07.000 --> 0:04:10.160
<v Speaker 1>and Noel no uh darn near everything about music. They

0:04:10.200 --> 0:04:13.560
<v Speaker 1>know a lot of stuff, which is dabble. We dabb

0:04:13.680 --> 0:04:16.600
<v Speaker 1>you guys dabble for sure, which is why every so

0:04:16.640 --> 0:04:20.560
<v Speaker 1>often you'll hear some uh some amazing sounds on our

0:04:20.600 --> 0:04:27.599
<v Speaker 1>audio podcast, our video podcast. But I digressed so hard. Yes,

0:04:28.120 --> 0:04:32.240
<v Speaker 1>So it's not just that this households could buy material goods.

0:04:32.480 --> 0:04:36.919
<v Speaker 1>It's that there is this lifestyle. Um. Maybe they don't

0:04:36.960 --> 0:04:42.320
<v Speaker 1>have two homes and travel to Florida every winter or something,

0:04:42.640 --> 0:04:46.080
<v Speaker 1>but they do probably have a summer vacation when the

0:04:46.160 --> 0:04:49.159
<v Speaker 1>kids out of school, yes exactly, and things like that.

0:04:49.279 --> 0:04:54.359
<v Speaker 1>So the further we drill down into this definition of

0:04:54.560 --> 0:04:57.360
<v Speaker 1>what a middle class is, uh, the more that we

0:04:57.400 --> 0:05:01.320
<v Speaker 1>find there is not necess fairly one size fits all

0:05:01.400 --> 0:05:06.080
<v Speaker 1>rule because what means middle class depends on the country

0:05:06.160 --> 0:05:08.800
<v Speaker 1>in which you live, absolutely, and as we live in

0:05:08.839 --> 0:05:14.560
<v Speaker 1>the US, we're going to be focusing primarily on that. Um.

0:05:14.600 --> 0:05:19.039
<v Speaker 1>So so let's look at the money factor first of all.

0:05:20.400 --> 0:05:25.679
<v Speaker 1>So the average income in the United States was fifty

0:05:25.760 --> 0:05:30.080
<v Speaker 1>one thousand and seventeen dollars in two thousand and twelve.

0:05:30.160 --> 0:05:35.640
<v Speaker 1>So that's just the the um then is that mean?

0:05:35.760 --> 0:05:39.480
<v Speaker 1>I guess it must be the average the middle number.

0:05:39.600 --> 0:05:43.680
<v Speaker 1>So counting all the people who made negligible and counting

0:05:43.720 --> 0:05:46.760
<v Speaker 1>all the people who made a lot, we end up

0:05:46.800 --> 0:05:50.920
<v Speaker 1>with a alarmingly deceptive number because you can't take an

0:05:50.960 --> 0:05:54.240
<v Speaker 1>average of that many people and that many uh in

0:05:54.560 --> 0:05:59.159
<v Speaker 1>that many environments, in different socioeconomic circumstances and expect it

0:05:59.200 --> 0:06:04.960
<v Speaker 1>to be very helpful. So, and there are two things

0:06:04.960 --> 0:06:08.640
<v Speaker 1>about that numbers that. First of all, it's pretty high. Yeah,

0:06:08.680 --> 0:06:11.200
<v Speaker 1>but it's not the highest. It's not like cutter or something,

0:06:11.320 --> 0:06:15.719
<v Speaker 1>right exactly, but it is globally pretty high. So let's

0:06:15.720 --> 0:06:18.920
<v Speaker 1>look at another place spend. Let's say the Democratic Republic

0:06:18.960 --> 0:06:23.960
<v Speaker 1>of Congo. The average income there is two hundred and

0:06:24.080 --> 0:06:29.160
<v Speaker 1>thirty six dollars. Wow. We should note, of course as well,

0:06:29.200 --> 0:06:31.960
<v Speaker 1>that that is one of the poorest countries in the

0:06:32.000 --> 0:06:36.320
<v Speaker 1>world by this metric. But it's weird, right, because they

0:06:36.440 --> 0:06:40.680
<v Speaker 1>also have a wealth of resources and suffer from what

0:06:41.000 --> 0:06:45.440
<v Speaker 1>is often called an international politics the resource curse. The

0:06:45.640 --> 0:06:50.640
<v Speaker 1>resource curse which is no, that's okay. That is just

0:06:50.680 --> 0:06:53.680
<v Speaker 1>another show and we will have to cover that again.

0:06:53.720 --> 0:06:56.120
<v Speaker 1>I think we mentioned that before. And another talking about

0:06:56.120 --> 0:07:00.440
<v Speaker 1>international banking we mentioned in resource extraction. You can check

0:07:00.480 --> 0:07:03.640
<v Speaker 1>out some of our We had an outdated video now,

0:07:03.680 --> 0:07:06.480
<v Speaker 1>but it still holds up pretty well called is China

0:07:06.640 --> 0:07:11.760
<v Speaker 1>Colonizing Africa? Which I would recommend to anybody who's interested

0:07:11.800 --> 0:07:18.480
<v Speaker 1>in stories of resource extraction or establishing slash fighting hedgemoney.

0:07:18.600 --> 0:07:20.080
<v Speaker 1>And if you don't want to look at our videos,

0:07:20.120 --> 0:07:23.480
<v Speaker 1>then just look up the current president of Bolivia so

0:07:23.480 --> 0:07:27.239
<v Speaker 1>you know how he's working with us. Uh. And remember

0:07:27.280 --> 0:07:29.640
<v Speaker 1>that we said Bolivia because that that will be interesting later.

0:07:29.800 --> 0:07:32.160
<v Speaker 1>So there's a standard. If we were to take a

0:07:32.280 --> 0:07:37.240
<v Speaker 1>standard definition from like a financial website, we would say, uh,

0:07:37.400 --> 0:07:39.640
<v Speaker 1>we will find a couple of different numbers. One that's

0:07:39.680 --> 0:07:42.200
<v Speaker 1>commonly found is that twenty five thousand to a hundred

0:07:42.200 --> 0:07:44.520
<v Speaker 1>thousand dollars of income a year is what most people

0:07:44.560 --> 0:07:48.840
<v Speaker 1>would consider a middle class income. Uh. This accounts for

0:07:48.880 --> 0:07:51.960
<v Speaker 1>a wide cost of living differential. So you know, it

0:07:52.040 --> 0:07:54.120
<v Speaker 1>costs more to live in New York City than it

0:07:54.160 --> 0:08:00.000
<v Speaker 1>does in um Fargo or Baring Forks. And so any

0:08:00.040 --> 0:08:03.280
<v Speaker 1>one who lives in San Francisco or New York will

0:08:03.320 --> 0:08:08.160
<v Speaker 1>tell you that twenty five thousand dollars a year is dirt, poor, dirty, poor,

0:08:08.480 --> 0:08:12.680
<v Speaker 1>um nothing. And that's because, uh, in that city, you

0:08:12.720 --> 0:08:18.400
<v Speaker 1>can't you can't make a long con you can't grow old,

0:08:18.480 --> 0:08:22.440
<v Speaker 1>support of family and retire and have a place to

0:08:22.520 --> 0:08:26.200
<v Speaker 1>sleep at night, right, right, dollars a year, I mean

0:08:26.400 --> 0:08:28.840
<v Speaker 1>you couldn't it. We'd be you'd be really hard pressed

0:08:28.840 --> 0:08:30.960
<v Speaker 1>to find a place to live. Yeah. Now there are

0:08:31.000 --> 0:08:38.000
<v Speaker 1>subsidies for fure and for residents, right, but this and

0:08:38.040 --> 0:08:40.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, of course we're not in any way detigrating

0:08:40.800 --> 0:08:44.360
<v Speaker 1>anybody who makes twenty five dollars and lives in a

0:08:44.480 --> 0:08:49.760
<v Speaker 1>very expensive city. Absolutely not. It's just the reality of living,

0:08:50.160 --> 0:08:52.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, cost of living in sety it's very different.

0:08:53.160 --> 0:08:56.160
<v Speaker 1>Like Atlanta, where we are based, has one of the

0:08:56.200 --> 0:08:59.800
<v Speaker 1>lowest costs of living for a city its size, and

0:09:00.240 --> 0:09:05.319
<v Speaker 1>only ever becomes apparent to me when I'm in another city. Yeah,

0:09:05.320 --> 0:09:08.320
<v Speaker 1>all right, So what we found is that this means

0:09:08.400 --> 0:09:13.960
<v Speaker 1>essentially there's no universally recognized definition of middle class, but

0:09:14.120 --> 0:09:18.840
<v Speaker 1>there is something different about the socioeconomic makeup of Western

0:09:18.920 --> 0:09:22.400
<v Speaker 1>countries over the last few decades. In many countries. The

0:09:22.440 --> 0:09:27.800
<v Speaker 1>Western middle class, however vaguely defined, isn't prospering at least

0:09:27.800 --> 0:09:30.360
<v Speaker 1>in the way that it once was back when we

0:09:30.400 --> 0:09:36.880
<v Speaker 1>had an economic boom with construction and industrialization in the US,

0:09:38.400 --> 0:09:43.760
<v Speaker 1>when we were making cars. Let's says, yeah, that's true.

0:09:43.840 --> 0:09:47.680
<v Speaker 1>There is a c change that is troubling to people,

0:09:47.720 --> 0:09:51.240
<v Speaker 1>and there's this it. We can't make any bones about it.

0:09:51.520 --> 0:09:54.640
<v Speaker 1>This is not a conspiracy theory, no matter how often

0:09:54.679 --> 0:09:57.679
<v Speaker 1>it may be presented. Is one. Uh, this is not

0:09:58.000 --> 0:10:02.440
<v Speaker 1>a It is true and hard numbers that inequality in

0:10:02.480 --> 0:10:06.000
<v Speaker 1>the United States is rising in some areas more than

0:10:06.040 --> 0:10:10.640
<v Speaker 1>other areas. So what does this mean for me? Would

0:10:10.640 --> 0:10:14.280
<v Speaker 1>be most people's question, right exactly, from the Koke Brothers

0:10:14.720 --> 0:10:19.320
<v Speaker 1>to uh, somebody making twenty one dollars and living just

0:10:19.480 --> 0:10:21.840
<v Speaker 1>outside of New York, the question would always be what

0:10:21.920 --> 0:10:26.280
<v Speaker 1>does this mean for me? Very different answers and exactly

0:10:26.960 --> 0:10:29.240
<v Speaker 1>so it First of all, it means a lot of

0:10:29.240 --> 0:10:31.360
<v Speaker 1>different things depending on where you are. Like we said

0:10:31.400 --> 0:10:34.640
<v Speaker 1>at the top, in developing, in emerging markets, we're actually

0:10:34.640 --> 0:10:39.160
<v Speaker 1>seeing a rise or in emerging middle class. So it's

0:10:39.200 --> 0:10:42.280
<v Speaker 1>not so much that the global middle class is dying

0:10:42.679 --> 0:10:45.080
<v Speaker 1>as it is that the middle class. What it means

0:10:45.200 --> 0:10:48.240
<v Speaker 1>b middle class is moving. Yeah, isn't that a weird idea.

0:10:48.840 --> 0:10:54.000
<v Speaker 1>It's just that that type of emerging wealth has just transferred,

0:10:54.000 --> 0:10:57.000
<v Speaker 1>it's just took a trip across the world other other

0:10:57.040 --> 0:10:59.880
<v Speaker 1>different places. That sort of lifestyle is become an increasing

0:11:00.160 --> 0:11:04.840
<v Speaker 1>popular in countries where it wasn't once upon a time. Exactly. So,

0:11:05.040 --> 0:11:09.480
<v Speaker 1>then we also see that rising inequality has dangerous effects

0:11:09.559 --> 0:11:13.520
<v Speaker 1>on the existing UH middle class of these of these

0:11:13.559 --> 0:11:17.920
<v Speaker 1>different countries. In October of two thousand fourteen, Interestingly enough,

0:11:18.040 --> 0:11:22.280
<v Speaker 1>the United Kingdom's wealthiest ten percent controlled fifty four point

0:11:22.360 --> 0:11:26.520
<v Speaker 1>one percent of the country's total wealth UM. If we

0:11:26.640 --> 0:11:28.920
<v Speaker 1>if we look at the math of that, you know,

0:11:29.000 --> 0:11:31.839
<v Speaker 1>it can be a deceptive thing. A lot of these

0:11:31.880 --> 0:11:35.800
<v Speaker 1>statistics can sound scary, and some of them were constructed

0:11:35.880 --> 0:11:39.240
<v Speaker 1>not by us, but constructed or framed to sound frightening.

0:11:39.760 --> 0:11:41.719
<v Speaker 1>We know that inequality is on the rise in the

0:11:41.800 --> 0:11:45.520
<v Speaker 1>United Kingdom, it's on the rise in UH the United States.

0:11:46.840 --> 0:11:50.160
<v Speaker 1>Maybe not for the same reasons, but there have been

0:11:50.240 --> 0:11:54.280
<v Speaker 1>some pretty smart people making some pretty good studies about

0:11:54.320 --> 0:11:57.680
<v Speaker 1>this right. The authors of the new study, Emmanuel Says

0:11:57.960 --> 0:12:01.880
<v Speaker 1>and Gabriel Zokman, highlight that the wealth inequality was high

0:12:01.920 --> 0:12:05.480
<v Speaker 1>in the beginning of the twentieth century, decreased steadily from

0:12:05.559 --> 0:12:09.479
<v Speaker 1>nineteen twenty nine to nineteen seventy eight, but was continuously

0:12:09.600 --> 0:12:13.520
<v Speaker 1>increased ever since then. Moreover, the increase in wealth inequality

0:12:13.640 --> 0:12:16.439
<v Speaker 1>is almost completely due to the increase in the top

0:12:16.840 --> 0:12:21.000
<v Speaker 1>point one percent wealth share from seven percent in nineteen

0:12:21.040 --> 0:12:25.280
<v Speaker 1>seventy nine to two percent in two thousand twelve, nearly

0:12:25.360 --> 0:12:28.440
<v Speaker 1>as high as in nineteen twenty nine. The study also

0:12:28.559 --> 0:12:32.200
<v Speaker 1>showed that the wealth share of the bottom wealth edged

0:12:32.320 --> 0:12:35.320
<v Speaker 1>up until the mid nineteen eighties and has been declining

0:12:35.360 --> 0:12:40.880
<v Speaker 1>steadily ever since. And today, Uh, huge majority of Americans

0:12:40.920 --> 0:12:43.920
<v Speaker 1>acknowledge the growing gap between the rich and the poor,

0:12:43.960 --> 0:12:46.280
<v Speaker 1>and a lot of people say, hey, I think that

0:12:46.559 --> 0:12:49.240
<v Speaker 1>is going to be a problem if it isn't already.

0:12:49.600 --> 0:12:55.120
<v Speaker 1>But there's little, uh, there's little agreement on the causes

0:12:55.400 --> 0:13:00.199
<v Speaker 1>of this rise in inequality or how to address sit.

0:13:00.480 --> 0:13:03.319
<v Speaker 1>You know what I mean, sure, Ben, So that question

0:13:03.720 --> 0:13:06.480
<v Speaker 1>is hugely complex, and you'll hear people like Russell Brand

0:13:06.679 --> 0:13:09.720
<v Speaker 1>talking about it on talk shows, even wrote a book

0:13:09.720 --> 0:13:13.160
<v Speaker 1>about it recently, UM and lots of other people just

0:13:13.440 --> 0:13:16.920
<v Speaker 1>trying to figure out a way to help stop this

0:13:17.080 --> 0:13:20.000
<v Speaker 1>inequality from increasing. And then there are people who say

0:13:20.080 --> 0:13:22.959
<v Speaker 1>that it's part of the system, so it should exist

0:13:23.040 --> 0:13:26.200
<v Speaker 1>in some way in a capitalist society sort of inherently

0:13:26.280 --> 0:13:29.360
<v Speaker 1>demands inequality. And then on the far side you have

0:13:29.720 --> 0:13:31.599
<v Speaker 1>people on the far far other side, you might have

0:13:31.760 --> 0:13:36.719
<v Speaker 1>people who say, uh, something like iron Rand was right

0:13:37.240 --> 0:13:41.480
<v Speaker 1>with her opinion and I do mean opinion about objectivism.

0:13:41.679 --> 0:13:43.120
<v Speaker 1>And then you have people on the other end of

0:13:43.160 --> 0:13:46.559
<v Speaker 1>the spectrum who will say, you know, why do we

0:13:46.679 --> 0:13:50.000
<v Speaker 1>need to have any sort of system. Let's just let

0:13:50.080 --> 0:13:52.760
<v Speaker 1>people do what they want because people are inherently good.

0:13:53.040 --> 0:13:56.160
<v Speaker 1>What's the worst that could happen? Right, Yeah, and then

0:13:56.200 --> 0:14:00.520
<v Speaker 1>we'll all be equal. Uh. However, we have some uh

0:14:00.760 --> 0:14:06.920
<v Speaker 1>compelling physiological evidence that human beings are not capable of

0:14:07.200 --> 0:14:09.960
<v Speaker 1>considering the rest of the human race as a peer,

0:14:10.600 --> 0:14:13.679
<v Speaker 1>as a as a group of people. We crap out

0:14:13.720 --> 0:14:16.960
<v Speaker 1>around a hundred and fifty. That's all our brain can

0:14:19.080 --> 0:14:25.960
<v Speaker 1>uh close or friends brain stuff on that. Yeah, Dunbar's number. Yeah, um,

0:14:26.160 --> 0:14:30.440
<v Speaker 1>And now we can go ahead. We set the stage

0:14:30.520 --> 0:14:33.560
<v Speaker 1>right the extinction of middle class, the definitions, uh, the

0:14:33.720 --> 0:14:38.200
<v Speaker 1>exploration and some of the assumptions, and now it's almost

0:14:38.280 --> 0:14:42.600
<v Speaker 1>time for the really crazy stuff. But first the word

0:14:42.640 --> 0:15:03.720
<v Speaker 1>from our sponsor. You know, usually we have our sponsor,

0:15:03.840 --> 0:15:07.640
<v Speaker 1>Illumination Global Unlimited coming in. Yeah, but they're not here

0:15:07.680 --> 0:15:10.800
<v Speaker 1>this week. I'm not sure. Maybe they'll come back sometime. Yeah.

0:15:10.840 --> 0:15:13.160
<v Speaker 1>It all depends really if the stars are in the

0:15:13.280 --> 0:15:15.800
<v Speaker 1>right positions. And sure there are a lot of factors

0:15:15.960 --> 0:15:21.080
<v Speaker 1>that Illumination Global Unlimited takes into account. Yeah. Um, and oh,

0:15:21.240 --> 0:15:23.160
<v Speaker 1>by the way, I guess we should say that for

0:15:23.240 --> 0:15:26.320
<v Speaker 1>anybody who hasn't checked out our episodes, Uh, be sure

0:15:26.400 --> 0:15:29.440
<v Speaker 1>to um put like a sheet over your TVs or

0:15:29.480 --> 0:15:32.480
<v Speaker 1>your mirrors if you're listening to or using a lot

0:15:32.520 --> 0:15:37.200
<v Speaker 1>of Illumination Global products. But anyway, just little ps a there. Uh,

0:15:38.160 --> 0:15:41.400
<v Speaker 1>here's the crazy stuff. Here's where it gets crazy. I

0:15:41.520 --> 0:15:44.800
<v Speaker 1>love it. Is there an oligarchy that is developed in

0:15:44.840 --> 0:15:47.480
<v Speaker 1>the United States? That's the big question. We all know

0:15:47.560 --> 0:15:51.040
<v Speaker 1>what an oligarchy is. It's a small group of interest

0:15:51.200 --> 0:15:55.760
<v Speaker 1>or whatever running a larger group. Sure, so do you

0:15:55.920 --> 0:16:00.960
<v Speaker 1>want my personal answer or my objective research answer. Uh,

0:16:01.320 --> 0:16:07.240
<v Speaker 1>let's see first the objective research and then your personal take. Well,

0:16:07.680 --> 0:16:10.920
<v Speaker 1>whether or not this has developed inside the United States

0:16:11.720 --> 0:16:14.160
<v Speaker 1>is a matter of debate. There are a lot of

0:16:14.240 --> 0:16:20.040
<v Speaker 1>different opinions. But there's something even more surprising about this subject.

0:16:20.120 --> 0:16:24.200
<v Speaker 1>When you look at the research across the world. The

0:16:24.280 --> 0:16:29.040
<v Speaker 1>globe as a whole, inequality has actually decreased, at least

0:16:29.080 --> 0:16:31.800
<v Speaker 1>for a time leading up to the recent economic disaster,

0:16:32.000 --> 0:16:34.320
<v Speaker 1>so to two thousand seven, and then some of the

0:16:34.360 --> 0:16:36.040
<v Speaker 1>other stuff that's been going on. So the things we're

0:16:36.040 --> 0:16:38.480
<v Speaker 1>getting better for a little while. But you have to

0:16:38.560 --> 0:16:41.920
<v Speaker 1>be really careful when you look at the stats. All Right,

0:16:42.040 --> 0:16:44.520
<v Speaker 1>we've got a great report via the Guardian the richest

0:16:44.600 --> 0:16:49.280
<v Speaker 1>one percent of the world's population are getting wealthier, if

0:16:49.360 --> 0:16:52.400
<v Speaker 1>not healthier, which almost said owning more than forty eight

0:16:52.600 --> 0:16:56.160
<v Speaker 1>percent of global wealth. This was according to the Credit

0:16:56.240 --> 0:17:01.000
<v Speaker 1>Suits Global Wealth Report, which you can find online. And uh,

0:17:01.960 --> 0:17:04.320
<v Speaker 1>here we go, though, when we say the richest one

0:17:04.440 --> 0:17:07.920
<v Speaker 1>percent of the entire world, that's such a bigger number

0:17:07.960 --> 0:17:12.400
<v Speaker 1>in both directions. So what what What are the numbers meant? Well,

0:17:12.440 --> 0:17:15.679
<v Speaker 1>a person only needs three thousand, six hundred and fifty

0:17:15.760 --> 0:17:19.600
<v Speaker 1>dollars including the value or equity in your home to

0:17:19.720 --> 0:17:24.240
<v Speaker 1>be among the wealthiest half of the world citizens. Wow, okay,

0:17:24.359 --> 0:17:27.080
<v Speaker 1>and then uh, to be a member of the top

0:17:27.200 --> 0:17:30.880
<v Speaker 1>ten percent of global wealthholders, you need more than seventies

0:17:31.040 --> 0:17:36.359
<v Speaker 1>seven thousand dollars. And that isn't a no like how

0:17:36.440 --> 0:17:40.760
<v Speaker 1>much money you make every year. That's how much worthy exactly,

0:17:40.800 --> 0:17:44.880
<v Speaker 1>there's something. And then, uh, last, but not least, can

0:17:44.920 --> 0:17:48.840
<v Speaker 1>we get a drum roll, No, you need seven hundred

0:17:48.920 --> 0:17:53.159
<v Speaker 1>and nine thousand dollars to belong in the top one percent. Now,

0:17:53.400 --> 0:17:57.080
<v Speaker 1>that's smaller. That's a smaller amount than I thought. But

0:17:57.160 --> 0:18:00.280
<v Speaker 1>I guess that's because it's a much bigger one percent. Sure,

0:18:00.840 --> 0:18:03.800
<v Speaker 1>So that is a lot more money than this guy

0:18:03.920 --> 0:18:08.440
<v Speaker 1>will ever see in his lifetime. Um, but you know

0:18:08.640 --> 0:18:13.040
<v Speaker 1>it's something to shoot for. Ben Uh. The American dream

0:18:13.160 --> 0:18:16.280
<v Speaker 1>as where we started in the beginning, So let's go

0:18:16.600 --> 0:18:20.600
<v Speaker 1>straight to some of the more conspiratorial stuff. One thing

0:18:20.680 --> 0:18:22.960
<v Speaker 1>that I thought was interesting that comes to us from

0:18:23.680 --> 0:18:29.600
<v Speaker 1>UH political spheres, right, is the idea that concerns over

0:18:29.680 --> 0:18:33.440
<v Speaker 1>inequality are some sort of noise or propaganda made by

0:18:34.280 --> 0:18:40.040
<v Speaker 1>socialist and communists seeking to overthrow capitalism. So I guess

0:18:40.119 --> 0:18:43.480
<v Speaker 1>the argument there would be that the nature of inequality

0:18:43.560 --> 0:18:47.119
<v Speaker 1>itself is being vilified and that it's not bad for

0:18:48.520 --> 0:18:51.399
<v Speaker 1>a few people to control as much wealth. Yeah, in

0:18:51.760 --> 0:18:56.680
<v Speaker 1>in the eyes of someone UH talking about this, I

0:18:56.760 --> 0:19:00.200
<v Speaker 1>would say they see it as more villainizing the rich,

0:19:01.119 --> 0:19:03.360
<v Speaker 1>and at least that in my head, that's what I see.

0:19:04.200 --> 0:19:08.080
<v Speaker 1>And I would you know, I would argue that perhaps

0:19:08.480 --> 0:19:12.359
<v Speaker 1>those arguments come from the wealthy a lot of the times, right,

0:19:12.440 --> 0:19:15.560
<v Speaker 1>and that would that would make sense because opponents of

0:19:16.240 --> 0:19:19.200
<v Speaker 1>that argument would say that there is a group of

0:19:19.320 --> 0:19:24.200
<v Speaker 1>wealthy elites actively working to disempower the populations of various countries,

0:19:24.720 --> 0:19:27.760
<v Speaker 1>which is not I'm it's gonna I'm gonna be honest.

0:19:27.840 --> 0:19:31.439
<v Speaker 1>It's totally been proven that that's happened in the past.

0:19:31.880 --> 0:19:34.600
<v Speaker 1>We know that that has happened in the past, um,

0:19:35.160 --> 0:19:39.480
<v Speaker 1>during times of imperialism or colonialism. And no, I'm not

0:19:39.840 --> 0:19:44.639
<v Speaker 1>just talking about European expansions. I'm talking about the history

0:19:44.760 --> 0:19:48.480
<v Speaker 1>of tribute states, the history of vassals and peasants and

0:19:48.640 --> 0:19:54.719
<v Speaker 1>servants and lifelong slavery, which still exists. I think Mauritaniah

0:19:55.359 --> 0:20:00.359
<v Speaker 1>still has quite a large slave population. Yeah. And also

0:20:00.440 --> 0:20:03.199
<v Speaker 1>if you look at the power of money in politics now,

0:20:03.400 --> 0:20:07.399
<v Speaker 1>especially in the US, um, you need a certain amount

0:20:07.440 --> 0:20:09.600
<v Speaker 1>of money to make any kind of waves in the

0:20:09.680 --> 0:20:14.720
<v Speaker 1>political sphere here, and you know, if you're increasing that

0:20:15.280 --> 0:20:18.480
<v Speaker 1>that wealth gap, then perhaps that's one of the goals.

0:20:18.880 --> 0:20:21.479
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. I'm just a guy man. Yeah, me too.

0:20:21.680 --> 0:20:24.879
<v Speaker 1>There's also there was all you remember. This might be

0:20:25.160 --> 0:20:27.679
<v Speaker 1>a little bit before some of our listeners time, uh,

0:20:27.920 --> 0:20:30.040
<v Speaker 1>but you remember growing up and hearing about the the

0:20:30.200 --> 0:20:35.280
<v Speaker 1>idea of trickle down economics, um, which I I still

0:20:36.119 --> 0:20:39.200
<v Speaker 1>probably have a child's understanding of that, because I didn't

0:20:39.240 --> 0:20:40.879
<v Speaker 1>really get it when I was a kid, and I

0:20:40.920 --> 0:20:42.800
<v Speaker 1>haven't looked into it too much. But I just want

0:20:42.840 --> 0:20:46.879
<v Speaker 1>to present these counter arguments. Oh sure, yeah, trickle down economics.

0:20:46.960 --> 0:20:50.960
<v Speaker 1>So the idea that when the ultra wealthy have a

0:20:51.000 --> 0:20:53.359
<v Speaker 1>lot of money, they spend a lot of money, and

0:20:53.720 --> 0:20:56.480
<v Speaker 1>then it trickles down throughout the economy because they're spending

0:20:56.520 --> 0:20:59.440
<v Speaker 1>money here and there and here and there, yase everybody else.

0:20:59.600 --> 0:21:03.200
<v Speaker 1>That's my understand Inherently, I don't understand how that would work,

0:21:03.359 --> 0:21:07.800
<v Speaker 1>because that is the dispersion of wealth, not the accumulation

0:21:07.960 --> 0:21:11.119
<v Speaker 1>of wealth. And also because of Swiss bank accounts and

0:21:11.520 --> 0:21:16.360
<v Speaker 1>or Australian incorporation, wouldn't you be more likely to try

0:21:16.520 --> 0:21:19.080
<v Speaker 1>to save money? I don't know, I I don't know.

0:21:19.440 --> 0:21:22.119
<v Speaker 1>But there's another point here, and this is the one

0:21:22.200 --> 0:21:24.920
<v Speaker 1>that I think has the most sand that the relationships

0:21:25.000 --> 0:21:29.399
<v Speaker 1>between governments and businesses are empowering wealthy actors, and by

0:21:29.440 --> 0:21:32.040
<v Speaker 1>that we mean companies as well as individuals at the

0:21:32.119 --> 0:21:35.600
<v Speaker 1>expense of the poor. Yeah, and again look at the

0:21:35.760 --> 0:21:40.680
<v Speaker 1>representation and governments where especially in places where money makes

0:21:40.800 --> 0:21:44.560
<v Speaker 1>the politician. Right. Yeah, So we we've talked about this,

0:21:44.680 --> 0:21:47.439
<v Speaker 1>you and I extensively when we've done any a series

0:21:47.480 --> 0:21:51.520
<v Speaker 1>on financial shenanigans. There's this, there's this argument. A lot

0:21:51.600 --> 0:21:55.520
<v Speaker 1>of people here in the States are very cynical about

0:21:55.560 --> 0:22:00.680
<v Speaker 1>the relationship between financial institutions and the regulatory bodies set

0:22:00.760 --> 0:22:05.680
<v Speaker 1>to watch those financial institutions. I can't air quote hard

0:22:05.840 --> 0:22:11.000
<v Speaker 1>enough UH on regulatory or watch. But but there and

0:22:11.119 --> 0:22:14.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, the idea, there is something that we lampooned

0:22:14.560 --> 0:22:19.639
<v Speaker 1>in an earlier podcast that these UH groups can't really

0:22:20.119 --> 0:22:23.920
<v Speaker 1>watch each other or have the kind of authoritative relationship

0:22:24.000 --> 0:22:25.840
<v Speaker 1>they need to have because they end up work the

0:22:25.920 --> 0:22:28.960
<v Speaker 1>individuals end up working for the same companies. But to

0:22:29.040 --> 0:22:33.440
<v Speaker 1>be fair, the counter argument is that this field is

0:22:33.600 --> 0:22:38.719
<v Speaker 1>so rarefied and complex that they're the only people qualified

0:22:38.720 --> 0:22:40.680
<v Speaker 1>to work in it. Sure, it makes my eyes my

0:22:40.800 --> 0:22:43.800
<v Speaker 1>eyes that I saw that I saw that they're rolling

0:22:43.880 --> 0:22:47.639
<v Speaker 1>hard they're still rolling. Uh So, without me personally commenting

0:22:47.720 --> 0:22:50.480
<v Speaker 1>on it, I just want to present that argument and

0:22:50.560 --> 0:22:56.280
<v Speaker 1>counter argument. It's true though, that governments have in the

0:22:56.400 --> 0:22:58.720
<v Speaker 1>eyes of the public, not just in the United States

0:22:58.760 --> 0:23:02.320
<v Speaker 1>but also in the United them uh that governments have

0:23:03.600 --> 0:23:08.200
<v Speaker 1>been seen as not stopping crimes by large financial institutions,

0:23:08.600 --> 0:23:13.160
<v Speaker 1>and typically that scene as further proof that the middle

0:23:13.280 --> 0:23:18.359
<v Speaker 1>class is somehow being squeezed out of a judicial process,

0:23:18.600 --> 0:23:22.719
<v Speaker 1>a legislative process, things like that. Um. But another thing

0:23:22.800 --> 0:23:25.240
<v Speaker 1>that you and I have run into quite often is

0:23:25.480 --> 0:23:29.680
<v Speaker 1>that the laws. It's it's very important to figure out

0:23:29.720 --> 0:23:32.440
<v Speaker 1>who gets to write laws, you know what I mean.

0:23:33.160 --> 0:23:36.760
<v Speaker 1>And the concerns that we have read about with the

0:23:36.880 --> 0:23:41.160
<v Speaker 1>idea of a disappearing middle class is that, first, it's

0:23:41.200 --> 0:23:44.200
<v Speaker 1>so very vaguely defined in the United States. If you

0:23:44.280 --> 0:23:47.320
<v Speaker 1>ask people to pull the majority of people in the

0:23:47.400 --> 0:23:50.400
<v Speaker 1>United States would say that they are the middle class. Um.

0:23:51.320 --> 0:23:55.680
<v Speaker 1>And politicians have wildly differing ideas about this. But are

0:23:55.800 --> 0:23:59.879
<v Speaker 1>these people being shut out of legislation? That's a question, right,

0:24:00.560 --> 0:24:03.159
<v Speaker 1>It's a really good question, and I think it should

0:24:03.160 --> 0:24:07.000
<v Speaker 1>be addressed by people who know more than us, right,

0:24:07.119 --> 0:24:11.000
<v Speaker 1>which might be you listeners. Hopefully Uh, so we wanted

0:24:11.080 --> 0:24:14.399
<v Speaker 1>to know if the if you think that the middle

0:24:14.480 --> 0:24:17.560
<v Speaker 1>class is disappearing, And let's keep in mind also that

0:24:17.840 --> 0:24:20.600
<v Speaker 1>over the great span of human existence, the middle class

0:24:20.680 --> 0:24:24.639
<v Speaker 1>is a very recent phenomena. Yeah, sure, absolutely, Um. And

0:24:24.760 --> 0:24:31.080
<v Speaker 1>also here's another question. Is it necessary that inequality exists

0:24:31.680 --> 0:24:36.200
<v Speaker 1>for let's save the entire system to run correctly. That's yeah,

0:24:36.240 --> 0:24:39.160
<v Speaker 1>that's a really good question. Is there a conscious drive

0:24:39.280 --> 0:24:43.119
<v Speaker 1>by someone or some group to accelerate inequality? Then I

0:24:43.280 --> 0:24:46.959
<v Speaker 1>was reading this thing right before we came in here. Um,

0:24:47.960 --> 0:24:51.240
<v Speaker 1>you can look this up. It was about restaurants in

0:24:52.000 --> 0:24:54.640
<v Speaker 1>the that aim for the middle class that our middle

0:24:54.680 --> 0:24:58.840
<v Speaker 1>of the road like, and it mentioned specifically places like

0:24:59.040 --> 0:25:05.920
<v Speaker 1>Red Lobster Um out Back. Yeah, and just talking about

0:25:05.960 --> 0:25:10.040
<v Speaker 1>how those being in owning a restaurant in that level

0:25:10.200 --> 0:25:15.880
<v Speaker 1>right now is really dangerous because restaurants are starting to shift. Um,

0:25:16.560 --> 0:25:18.919
<v Speaker 1>at least the ones that are prospering right now are

0:25:19.000 --> 0:25:23.320
<v Speaker 1>either the really ritzy, high priced places with locally sourced

0:25:23.359 --> 0:25:26.520
<v Speaker 1>food that's just prepared by you know, chef genius in

0:25:26.600 --> 0:25:29.320
<v Speaker 1>the back, and then to the fast food this is

0:25:29.359 --> 0:25:32.680
<v Speaker 1>as cheap as it can possibly get. And the people

0:25:32.720 --> 0:25:35.359
<v Speaker 1>in the middle are finding that they're just losing money

0:25:35.440 --> 0:25:41.360
<v Speaker 1>week after week. So if middle class families aren't disappearing,

0:25:41.680 --> 0:25:45.760
<v Speaker 1>middle class restaurants are, well, people aren't going out. The

0:25:45.920 --> 0:25:49.760
<v Speaker 1>idea is that the people who find themselves and identify

0:25:49.840 --> 0:25:53.159
<v Speaker 1>in the middle class are trying to save every bit

0:25:53.200 --> 0:25:56.119
<v Speaker 1>of money that they possibly can because they're feeling squeeze,

0:25:56.560 --> 0:25:59.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, perhaps not getting that small raise for cost

0:26:00.200 --> 0:26:03.760
<v Speaker 1>living every year, or not getting just what all the

0:26:03.840 --> 0:26:08.159
<v Speaker 1>different reason, medical emergency, anything that could pop up. So

0:26:08.280 --> 0:26:10.760
<v Speaker 1>I think that's really interesting to me, and it made

0:26:10.800 --> 0:26:14.960
<v Speaker 1>me think about my past growing up, and we my

0:26:15.119 --> 0:26:17.000
<v Speaker 1>family just says a little anecdote. I want to see

0:26:17.000 --> 0:26:20.360
<v Speaker 1>if anybody identifies with this. When it was a special occasion.

0:26:21.400 --> 0:26:24.119
<v Speaker 1>After I got two, about ten, red lobster was like

0:26:24.320 --> 0:26:27.480
<v Speaker 1>my jam So if it was a special occasion, I

0:26:27.600 --> 0:26:29.920
<v Speaker 1>was like, Mom, Dad, please can we go get some

0:26:30.040 --> 0:26:34.639
<v Speaker 1>of those garlic? Yeah? Um, that's all I wanted. I

0:26:34.680 --> 0:26:36.440
<v Speaker 1>don't care about the lobster. I didn't care about any

0:26:36.440 --> 0:26:39.359
<v Speaker 1>other stuff. I just wanted those biscuits. But yeah, we

0:26:39.400 --> 0:26:41.560
<v Speaker 1>could only afford to go there. Maybe you know a

0:26:41.640 --> 0:26:47.439
<v Speaker 1>couple of times a year, dude, But it just makes me, uh,

0:26:48.119 --> 0:26:51.480
<v Speaker 1>I see what you're saying because it now in retrospect,

0:26:51.520 --> 0:26:53.920
<v Speaker 1>you're thinking, yeah, this is not a place we would

0:26:53.920 --> 0:26:57.919
<v Speaker 1>go every week exactly because we couldn't afford to, at

0:26:58.000 --> 0:27:01.639
<v Speaker 1>least at the time. Um. But yeah, it makes me.

0:27:01.960 --> 0:27:05.680
<v Speaker 1>It just makes me wonder what effect that has on

0:27:05.800 --> 0:27:09.240
<v Speaker 1>the wider scale, just if you're just looking at restaurants, Like,

0:27:09.359 --> 0:27:12.239
<v Speaker 1>what what else is starting to disappear? Sure, and that's

0:27:12.280 --> 0:27:15.040
<v Speaker 1>a really good question, like are there certain types of

0:27:15.320 --> 0:27:23.280
<v Speaker 1>cars that people aren't buying? Um? What about home home purchases? Right? Uh, vacations,

0:27:23.400 --> 0:27:26.159
<v Speaker 1>all the stuff we named in the beginning essentially, and

0:27:26.720 --> 0:27:29.720
<v Speaker 1>you know you can track that to the skyrocketing costs

0:27:29.920 --> 0:27:34.080
<v Speaker 1>of some of these things as well as wage stagnation.

0:27:35.040 --> 0:27:38.560
<v Speaker 1>And everybody, big hand to know for editing that thing.

0:27:39.240 --> 0:27:41.440
<v Speaker 1>I was trying to say that sentence like four times

0:27:41.480 --> 0:27:44.680
<v Speaker 1>in a row. Yeah, big up. Everything you like about

0:27:44.720 --> 0:27:47.760
<v Speaker 1>this show is probably null. All right, Well, we've got

0:27:47.880 --> 0:27:50.720
<v Speaker 1>to get out of here, everybody. I'm so sorry, Matt.

0:27:50.720 --> 0:27:53.040
<v Speaker 1>I have one piece of listener mail for you. Fine,

0:27:57.960 --> 0:28:01.760
<v Speaker 1>Pope Ge writes to us and says, I really enjoy

0:28:01.880 --> 0:28:04.520
<v Speaker 1>listening to your podcast. While listening to the show today,

0:28:04.600 --> 0:28:08.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm stuck. I'm wanting to know if Matt Frederick is Canadian.

0:28:08.640 --> 0:28:12.840
<v Speaker 1>He sounds like he is. That's all they said. Really,

0:28:12.920 --> 0:28:16.840
<v Speaker 1>that's that's what he wants to know. Wow. Hey, Uh no, sir,

0:28:17.240 --> 0:28:21.800
<v Speaker 1>I I am not Canadian. I was born in Alpharetta, Georgia,

0:28:22.160 --> 0:28:25.760
<v Speaker 1>and I have lived less than fifty miles from there

0:28:25.840 --> 0:28:29.800
<v Speaker 1>my whole life. So wow, as far as we know.

0:28:34.119 --> 0:28:36.840
<v Speaker 1>And on that note, ladies and gentlemen, I apologize for

0:28:36.880 --> 0:28:38.520
<v Speaker 1>interrupting you, Matt. I thought it was a great question

0:28:38.560 --> 0:28:40.080
<v Speaker 1>and we should get it out there in case other

0:28:40.160 --> 0:28:43.720
<v Speaker 1>people believe that you're Canadian. Not that there's anything wrong.

0:28:44.120 --> 0:28:47.480
<v Speaker 1>It's quite all right, ben. So, Uh, everybody find us

0:28:47.560 --> 0:28:50.240
<v Speaker 1>on Facebook A and uh, go ahead and hit us

0:28:50.320 --> 0:28:53.840
<v Speaker 1>up on Twitter. We're at conspiracy stuff there. Also on

0:28:53.920 --> 0:28:56.720
<v Speaker 1>Facebook conspiracy stuff. Go to our website. Stuff they don't

0:28:56.720 --> 0:28:59.600
<v Speaker 1>want you to know. For everything we've ever done, it

0:28:59.680 --> 0:29:02.400
<v Speaker 1>all exists there, and it's all wondrous. Uh. The U

0:29:02.520 --> 0:29:04.440
<v Speaker 1>r L maybe a little long, but hey you can

0:29:04.560 --> 0:29:07.200
<v Speaker 1>you can figure it out, uh the last, but not

0:29:07.240 --> 0:29:08.400
<v Speaker 1>at least. If you don't want to do any of

0:29:08.480 --> 0:29:12.480
<v Speaker 1>that stuff, just send us an email. We are conspiracy

0:29:12.640 --> 0:29:19.080
<v Speaker 1>at how stuff works dot com. From more on this topic,

0:29:19.200 --> 0:29:24.600
<v Speaker 1>another unexplained phenomenon. Visit test tube dot com slash conspiracy stuff.

0:29:24.920 --> 0:29:26.920
<v Speaker 1>You can also get in touch on Twitter at the

0:29:27.040 --> 0:29:28.960
<v Speaker 1>handle at conspiracy stuff.