WEBVTT - Bloomberg Surveillance TV: October 17th, 2025

0:00:00.080 --> 0:00:06.760
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio News.

0:00:11.680 --> 0:00:15.480
<v Speaker 2>This is the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. I'm Jonathan Ferrow, along

0:00:15.520 --> 0:00:18.720
<v Speaker 2>with Lisa Bromwitz and Amerie Hordern. Join us each day

0:00:18.760 --> 0:00:22.280
<v Speaker 2>for insight from the best in markets, economics, and geopolitics

0:00:22.440 --> 0:00:24.880
<v Speaker 2>from our global headquarters in New York City. We are

0:00:24.960 --> 0:00:27.680
<v Speaker 2>live on Bloomberg Television weekday mornings from six to nine

0:00:27.720 --> 0:00:31.319
<v Speaker 2>am Eastern. Subscribe to the podcast on Apple, Spotify or

0:00:31.320 --> 0:00:33.960
<v Speaker 2>anywhere else you listen, and as always on the Bloomberg

0:00:34.040 --> 0:00:38.280
<v Speaker 2>Terminal and the Bloomberg Business app. Stockslower as doubtscrow over

0:00:38.280 --> 0:00:40.680
<v Speaker 2>the credit house of US regional banks. Lisa is standing

0:00:40.720 --> 0:00:44.640
<v Speaker 2>by with a key guest. Hey Lisa, Hey John, thanks

0:00:44.680 --> 0:00:45.040
<v Speaker 2>so much.

0:00:45.080 --> 0:00:48.360
<v Speaker 3>I am here with Christian Saving, the CEO of Deutsche Bank.

0:00:48.400 --> 0:00:50.559
<v Speaker 3>And before we get started, I want to say we

0:00:50.560 --> 0:00:53.199
<v Speaker 3>booked this weeks ago. This was not necessarily booked to

0:00:53.240 --> 0:00:55.880
<v Speaker 3>talk about the credit issues that are emerging to stave

0:00:55.920 --> 0:00:58.440
<v Speaker 3>off any concerns that might be percolating out. But I

0:00:58.480 --> 0:01:00.680
<v Speaker 3>do want to start there this idea that this morning

0:01:00.720 --> 0:01:02.160
<v Speaker 3>we're all focused on.

0:01:02.000 --> 0:01:02.840
<v Speaker 4>What are we missing?

0:01:03.080 --> 0:01:04.160
<v Speaker 1>Have things gotten too.

0:01:04.000 --> 0:01:07.520
<v Speaker 3>Frauthy and have there been some issues of fraud or

0:01:07.640 --> 0:01:10.720
<v Speaker 3>easy financing conditions. Do you see that anywhere.

0:01:10.319 --> 0:01:14.240
<v Speaker 5>In your book, morning, Liza, I know, actually not. I

0:01:14.319 --> 0:01:16.120
<v Speaker 5>mean there's a lot of volatility in the market. We

0:01:16.160 --> 0:01:18.479
<v Speaker 5>have seen that actually over the last weeks and months.

0:01:18.560 --> 0:01:22.039
<v Speaker 5>Whenever something is supposed to be the market is reacting.

0:01:23.000 --> 0:01:24.880
<v Speaker 5>In our books, I can tell you no, there is

0:01:24.920 --> 0:01:28.080
<v Speaker 5>no deterioration we have. Actually, we are very confident with

0:01:28.200 --> 0:01:31.880
<v Speaker 5>our credit portfolio and that across the world, whether it's

0:01:31.880 --> 0:01:34.759
<v Speaker 5>in Germany, whether it's in Europe, whether it's in the US,

0:01:35.240 --> 0:01:39.280
<v Speaker 5>in the different asset classes corporate bank, private bank, and

0:01:39.640 --> 0:01:44.520
<v Speaker 5>in this regard, I think the market is reacting quite heavily,

0:01:45.280 --> 0:01:47.319
<v Speaker 5>but I think you always have to see it over

0:01:47.400 --> 0:01:50.440
<v Speaker 5>the long term, and so far, to be honest, I

0:01:50.480 --> 0:01:51.480
<v Speaker 5>see no credit.

0:01:51.160 --> 0:01:52.440
<v Speaker 4>Deterioration long term.

0:01:52.560 --> 0:01:54.840
<v Speaker 3>Your shares are up more than eighty percent so far

0:01:54.880 --> 0:01:57.320
<v Speaker 3>this year, so a couple percent here there is sort

0:01:57.360 --> 0:01:59.480
<v Speaker 3>of you know, Okay, it's tough, but we can manage

0:01:59.520 --> 0:02:04.280
<v Speaker 3>through it. Just wondering though, whether it's indicative of people's

0:02:04.320 --> 0:02:06.120
<v Speaker 3>mood that people are looking for a reason to sell

0:02:06.200 --> 0:02:08.680
<v Speaker 3>because they're getting nervous about how good things are getting

0:02:08.720 --> 0:02:09.160
<v Speaker 3>and how.

0:02:09.040 --> 0:02:10.600
<v Speaker 1>Far valuations have gone.

0:02:10.600 --> 0:02:13.720
<v Speaker 3>Do you see that with any executives and the confidence

0:02:13.720 --> 0:02:16.359
<v Speaker 3>that you're hearing from them in terms of what they're

0:02:16.360 --> 0:02:18.960
<v Speaker 3>seeking to do or how much they're extending to planning

0:02:19.000 --> 0:02:19.560
<v Speaker 3>to expand.

0:02:19.840 --> 0:02:21.920
<v Speaker 1>No, actually confidence is quite good.

0:02:22.480 --> 0:02:26.800
<v Speaker 5>I mean, there's obviously always the risk in case in

0:02:26.840 --> 0:02:31.040
<v Speaker 5>case a recession would come, then obviously the confidence would

0:02:31.080 --> 0:02:33.200
<v Speaker 5>go down. You would also see then a situation in

0:02:33.200 --> 0:02:35.799
<v Speaker 5>the credititfolio. But this is not the topic at all. Also,

0:02:35.840 --> 0:02:38.600
<v Speaker 5>in the whole week here in Washington, we haven't discussed

0:02:38.600 --> 0:02:41.480
<v Speaker 5>the topic of recession at all. People are seeing growth,

0:02:41.760 --> 0:02:45.359
<v Speaker 5>they're seeing employment. We talk a lot about what is

0:02:45.400 --> 0:02:48.359
<v Speaker 5>happening in Germany and in Europe and how we can

0:02:48.440 --> 0:02:54.040
<v Speaker 5>actually grow competitiveness and the economic output. So therefore I

0:02:54.040 --> 0:02:58.200
<v Speaker 5>wouldn't say that people are concerned. Of course, the geopolitical

0:02:58.280 --> 0:03:07.440
<v Speaker 5>uncertainties still discussions. Other other issues are also dominating, dominating

0:03:07.480 --> 0:03:10.760
<v Speaker 5>the discussions, But I wouldn't say that there is a

0:03:10.880 --> 0:03:15.040
<v Speaker 5>concern of the executives. We are watching the market, but

0:03:15.120 --> 0:03:18.480
<v Speaker 5>there is nothing out where I would say people are

0:03:18.520 --> 0:03:21.000
<v Speaker 5>concerned of a deterioration given the fact.

0:03:20.840 --> 0:03:23.960
<v Speaker 3>That there are so many uncertainties still outstanding. Are you

0:03:24.000 --> 0:03:26.160
<v Speaker 3>surprised by how much optimism you've been hearing.

0:03:28.800 --> 0:03:31.799
<v Speaker 5>Yes, because we have talked for the last two years,

0:03:31.840 --> 0:03:36.200
<v Speaker 5>given all the instabilities and uncertainties, when when is actually

0:03:36.280 --> 0:03:39.920
<v Speaker 5>a potential down downturn in the market's coming. But again,

0:03:39.960 --> 0:03:42.680
<v Speaker 5>there is a lot of liquidity in the market people.

0:03:43.240 --> 0:03:45.240
<v Speaker 5>We have seen it, for instance in the in the

0:03:45.280 --> 0:03:48.440
<v Speaker 5>second quarter when there was a stimulus program in Germany,

0:03:48.440 --> 0:03:51.640
<v Speaker 5>how much liquidity came to Europe. And you see that

0:03:51.720 --> 0:03:55.440
<v Speaker 5>people really want to deploy their money. And therefore, I

0:03:55.480 --> 0:03:57.360
<v Speaker 5>think you always have to see if there is a

0:03:57.480 --> 0:04:01.920
<v Speaker 5>slight decrease in market prices, liquidity immediately comes in again.

0:04:02.360 --> 0:04:06.400
<v Speaker 5>And therefore I'm still optimistic actually that we are not

0:04:06.520 --> 0:04:07.920
<v Speaker 5>talking about an overvaluation.

0:04:08.000 --> 0:04:09.960
<v Speaker 1>We have some stretch valuations.

0:04:09.480 --> 0:04:12.400
<v Speaker 5>No doubt, but I wouldn't say that the whole market

0:04:12.400 --> 0:04:13.000
<v Speaker 5>is overvalued.

0:04:13.160 --> 0:04:15.960
<v Speaker 3>Let's talk about Germany and European banks in general have

0:04:16.000 --> 0:04:18.000
<v Speaker 3>been on a tear this year, and it's been driven

0:04:18.040 --> 0:04:20.640
<v Speaker 3>by this idea that maybe there will be deregulation and

0:04:20.720 --> 0:04:24.200
<v Speaker 3>maybe there will be actual fiscal spending to support the region.

0:04:24.760 --> 0:04:28.640
<v Speaker 3>Are you seeing any actual tangible signs of deregulation that

0:04:28.720 --> 0:04:32.680
<v Speaker 3>you think could unleash, whether it's bank mergers, whether it's

0:04:32.839 --> 0:04:35.680
<v Speaker 3>just more dynamism in the European banking sector.

0:04:36.440 --> 0:04:37.720
<v Speaker 1>Well, at least we have discussions.

0:04:38.279 --> 0:04:41.240
<v Speaker 5>I mean, look, there are also some tangible items like

0:04:42.240 --> 0:04:46.159
<v Speaker 5>the delay in the implementation of fr to be we

0:04:46.279 --> 0:04:50.160
<v Speaker 5>have also in certain national buffers. When it comes to

0:04:50.279 --> 0:04:54.640
<v Speaker 5>capital buffers, we have seen some movements of the national regulators,

0:04:54.640 --> 0:04:57.039
<v Speaker 5>but also of the ECB. I think we have a

0:04:57.080 --> 0:05:01.120
<v Speaker 5>constructive discussion with the ECB. We are talking about that

0:05:01.160 --> 0:05:04.480
<v Speaker 5>we as European banks, are demanding a level playing field.

0:05:04.520 --> 0:05:07.080
<v Speaker 5>We see the developments here in the US, we see

0:05:07.080 --> 0:05:09.640
<v Speaker 5>developments in the UK, and therefore I think there are

0:05:09.680 --> 0:05:12.239
<v Speaker 5>constructive discussions with our regulators, so there.

0:05:12.080 --> 0:05:12.760
<v Speaker 1>Is some movement.

0:05:13.920 --> 0:05:18.520
<v Speaker 5>Nevertheless, I think it's not only about regulation. I think

0:05:18.560 --> 0:05:21.600
<v Speaker 5>the most important is how can we ensure that Europe

0:05:21.640 --> 0:05:26.200
<v Speaker 5>of all, but also Germany is actually increasing the competitiveness

0:05:26.200 --> 0:05:29.080
<v Speaker 5>and growth, and therefore we need to do more on

0:05:29.120 --> 0:05:32.720
<v Speaker 5>the structural reform saute, which goes way beyond bank regulations.

0:05:33.279 --> 0:05:35.520
<v Speaker 5>That is actually the topic which we need to push for,

0:05:35.760 --> 0:05:38.480
<v Speaker 5>because at the end of the day, regulation is important,

0:05:38.520 --> 0:05:40.960
<v Speaker 5>we need a level playing field, but the most important

0:05:41.000 --> 0:05:43.480
<v Speaker 5>is the underlying growth and therefore we need structural reforms

0:05:43.480 --> 0:05:44.120
<v Speaker 5>in Europe is.

0:05:44.040 --> 0:05:44.840
<v Speaker 2>That friscal spending.

0:05:44.880 --> 0:05:46.640
<v Speaker 3>Are you saying that you hope that they increase it

0:05:46.720 --> 0:05:49.200
<v Speaker 3>more and that you're already seeing stimulative effects from that?

0:05:49.480 --> 0:05:54.680
<v Speaker 5>I suppose I personally think that the debt break alignment

0:05:54.720 --> 0:05:56.680
<v Speaker 5>and adjustments which we have seen in Germany was the

0:05:56.800 --> 0:05:59.680
<v Speaker 5>right step to do. But only doing this is not

0:05:59.720 --> 0:06:02.920
<v Speaker 5>the right thing. Just increasing debt is not the right thing.

0:06:03.000 --> 0:06:05.520
<v Speaker 5>What you need to do is in parallel work on

0:06:05.560 --> 0:06:09.160
<v Speaker 5>structural reforms that it makes sense for corporate's private individuals

0:06:09.200 --> 0:06:11.880
<v Speaker 5>to invest. And that has all about to do with

0:06:13.279 --> 0:06:17.160
<v Speaker 5>tackling the problem of energy prices in Germany, reducing bureaucracy,

0:06:17.880 --> 0:06:21.720
<v Speaker 5>making sure that we are doing bigger investments into infrastructure,

0:06:22.000 --> 0:06:26.440
<v Speaker 5>that the approvals for new investments are not taking that

0:06:26.560 --> 0:06:27.640
<v Speaker 5>long as it did before.

0:06:27.960 --> 0:06:29.080
<v Speaker 1>All that needs to be done.

0:06:29.120 --> 0:06:35.360
<v Speaker 5>So aligning or just growing by a stimulus program will.

0:06:34.560 --> 0:06:35.280
<v Speaker 1>Not be sufficient.

0:06:35.600 --> 0:06:38.479
<v Speaker 5>We need imperilel structural reforms, and there I can see

0:06:38.520 --> 0:06:41.360
<v Speaker 5>that actually the German government is taking the first step.

0:06:41.400 --> 0:06:42.400
<v Speaker 1>So what about businesses?

0:06:42.480 --> 0:06:45.880
<v Speaker 3>How much are businesses in Germany moving away from places

0:06:45.920 --> 0:06:49.120
<v Speaker 3>like China in terms of sources of business? How much

0:06:49.120 --> 0:06:52.880
<v Speaker 3>are you seeing those fissures just in the companies that

0:06:52.960 --> 0:06:53.560
<v Speaker 3>you work with.

0:06:54.000 --> 0:06:56.680
<v Speaker 5>Well, it's the result already of the COVID. I think

0:06:56.760 --> 0:07:00.680
<v Speaker 5>after COVID people really thought far more about diversification. We

0:07:00.720 --> 0:07:04.799
<v Speaker 5>can see that German corporates, European corporates are very active

0:07:05.240 --> 0:07:10.520
<v Speaker 5>in diversifying their supply chains, their production chains, and are

0:07:10.560 --> 0:07:16.680
<v Speaker 5>also trying to invest more globally and less concentrated. You

0:07:16.720 --> 0:07:20.160
<v Speaker 5>can also see actually that business are confident actually to

0:07:20.360 --> 0:07:23.320
<v Speaker 5>really reinvest in Germany. You may have heard about the

0:07:23.360 --> 0:07:28.240
<v Speaker 5>initiative which is running in Germany, the Made for Germany initiative,

0:07:28.760 --> 0:07:31.720
<v Speaker 5>where more than one hundred corporates are actually committed to

0:07:31.920 --> 0:07:34.680
<v Speaker 5>invest over seven hundred billion euros in Germany over the

0:07:34.760 --> 0:07:38.080
<v Speaker 5>next three years. That shows actually that there is confidence

0:07:38.120 --> 0:07:41.520
<v Speaker 5>in the business and at the same time that corporates

0:07:41.560 --> 0:07:43.880
<v Speaker 5>are really redistributing their supply chains.

0:07:43.920 --> 0:07:45.880
<v Speaker 3>Are you seeing any clients trying to shift away from

0:07:45.880 --> 0:07:47.040
<v Speaker 3>dollar exposure right now?

0:07:48.120 --> 0:07:52.440
<v Speaker 5>Look, there was clearly a trend in Q two about reallocation.

0:07:53.040 --> 0:07:56.800
<v Speaker 5>But I wouldn't join the core of saying well, that

0:07:56.920 --> 0:07:59.920
<v Speaker 5>is the end of the US dollar as the reserve current.

0:08:00.480 --> 0:08:02.960
<v Speaker 1>The US dollar will be the reserve currency.

0:08:03.320 --> 0:08:05.400
<v Speaker 5>But I think that a lot of investors actually are

0:08:05.480 --> 0:08:09.360
<v Speaker 5>trying to reallocate, and in particular with what happened in

0:08:09.400 --> 0:08:11.960
<v Speaker 5>the second quarter in Germany but also in Europe, you

0:08:12.000 --> 0:08:14.800
<v Speaker 5>could see a shift to Europe and that's actually the

0:08:14.840 --> 0:08:17.440
<v Speaker 5>momentum which we need to retain and where we need

0:08:17.480 --> 0:08:17.880
<v Speaker 5>to build on.

0:08:18.240 --> 0:08:21.120
<v Speaker 3>And this move away from the dollar has been largely

0:08:21.120 --> 0:08:23.120
<v Speaker 3>in derivative's markets. I mean, how much has that just

0:08:23.160 --> 0:08:25.840
<v Speaker 3>been on fire this year in terms of hedging any

0:08:25.880 --> 0:08:29.320
<v Speaker 3>exposure to the dollar, not necessarily getting out of dollar

0:08:29.360 --> 0:08:30.360
<v Speaker 3>denominated assets.

0:08:30.880 --> 0:08:31.800
<v Speaker 1>Well, I think it's both.

0:08:31.840 --> 0:08:34.920
<v Speaker 5>It's it's not only in the derivative market can we

0:08:35.040 --> 0:08:38.320
<v Speaker 5>really have seen rear flows And therefore it has been

0:08:38.720 --> 0:08:40.839
<v Speaker 5>it has been a trend in Q two, it's a

0:08:40.920 --> 0:08:44.200
<v Speaker 5>little bit reversing in Q three. And therefore it is

0:08:44.240 --> 0:08:47.840
<v Speaker 5>so important in particular for Europe that they really continue.

0:08:47.400 --> 0:08:48.440
<v Speaker 1>With structural reforms.

0:08:48.480 --> 0:08:50.720
<v Speaker 5>If this is not going through, if we are not

0:08:50.800 --> 0:08:54.679
<v Speaker 5>continued with structural reforms, then obviously grows and therefore so

0:08:54.760 --> 0:08:59.040
<v Speaker 5>the inflow in European assets will not further increase.

0:08:59.200 --> 0:09:02.160
<v Speaker 3>And is that just whether there will be reforms or not.

0:09:02.200 --> 0:09:05.200
<v Speaker 3>How does that effect where you want your footprint to

0:09:05.280 --> 0:09:06.720
<v Speaker 3>be dominant?

0:09:06.760 --> 0:09:06.920
<v Speaker 1>Right?

0:09:06.960 --> 0:09:08.719
<v Speaker 3>Do you want to be more in Germany. Do you

0:09:08.760 --> 0:09:10.360
<v Speaker 3>want to be more in the United States? Do you

0:09:10.440 --> 0:09:12.800
<v Speaker 3>want to expand more in one place or another based

0:09:12.840 --> 0:09:15.959
<v Speaker 3>on your faith, hope, et cetera, that there will be

0:09:16.000 --> 0:09:18.920
<v Speaker 3>reform in Europe versus what actually is happening elsewhere.

0:09:19.360 --> 0:09:22.880
<v Speaker 5>Look, Liza, for me, it is that from a bank's

0:09:22.920 --> 0:09:25.280
<v Speaker 5>point of view, the most important is to be diversified,

0:09:25.600 --> 0:09:28.280
<v Speaker 5>and we as Loutsche Bank, have taking a clear decision

0:09:28.559 --> 0:09:30.600
<v Speaker 5>to be a global bank and to make sure that

0:09:30.640 --> 0:09:34.000
<v Speaker 5>we are not too concentrated in any one of the regions.

0:09:34.160 --> 0:09:35.240
<v Speaker 1>Of course, when you.

0:09:35.120 --> 0:09:37.599
<v Speaker 5>Have your home market in Germany with forty percent of

0:09:37.679 --> 0:09:40.640
<v Speaker 5>the revenues, you have a great interest that this country

0:09:40.720 --> 0:09:43.280
<v Speaker 5>is growing, that you have the right structural reforms, that

0:09:43.320 --> 0:09:44.800
<v Speaker 5>fiscal stimulus is kicking in.

0:09:45.080 --> 0:09:47.760
<v Speaker 1>But at the same time, despite.

0:09:47.600 --> 0:09:51.560
<v Speaker 5>All the talks about the end of globalization, globalization will

0:09:51.559 --> 0:09:55.079
<v Speaker 5>not end. Globalization will be different going forward, but that

0:09:55.240 --> 0:09:58.640
<v Speaker 5>needs actually global banks with local nohow and that is

0:09:58.679 --> 0:10:01.040
<v Speaker 5>actually where we are focusing from a Deutsche Bank point

0:10:01.040 --> 0:10:04.520
<v Speaker 5>of view, strong home market, but being an international player,

0:10:04.559 --> 0:10:07.920
<v Speaker 5>because what we see from our clients, they would like

0:10:08.000 --> 0:10:11.439
<v Speaker 5>to have a bank with an international exposure, with an

0:10:11.480 --> 0:10:14.960
<v Speaker 5>international expertise, and that with the global network, and that's

0:10:15.000 --> 0:10:18.679
<v Speaker 5>exactly what we want to be. So diversified and a

0:10:18.760 --> 0:10:21.240
<v Speaker 5>global setup is I think the key to success.

0:10:21.280 --> 0:10:23.440
<v Speaker 3>Are you interested in any acquisitions or is this going

0:10:23.480 --> 0:10:25.959
<v Speaker 3>to be a very organic process going forward?

0:10:26.000 --> 0:10:28.520
<v Speaker 5>So very organic process. Look, I'm very happy with the

0:10:28.520 --> 0:10:32.600
<v Speaker 5>development which we have taken. You were just talking about

0:10:32.600 --> 0:10:35.199
<v Speaker 5>our share price. I think overall the bank has done

0:10:35.600 --> 0:10:39.439
<v Speaker 5>very well over the last three four years. The turnaround

0:10:39.440 --> 0:10:42.400
<v Speaker 5>has been completed, and now it's really bringing the bank

0:10:42.440 --> 0:10:44.720
<v Speaker 5>from a ten percent hour to eat to the next stage.

0:10:45.160 --> 0:10:49.880
<v Speaker 5>All leavers for that are leavers which are sort of say,

0:10:50.000 --> 0:10:51.199
<v Speaker 5>within our own hands.

0:10:51.480 --> 0:10:52.360
<v Speaker 1>It's about a.

0:10:52.280 --> 0:10:56.000
<v Speaker 5>Better capital management, it's about focus growth, it's further about

0:10:56.720 --> 0:11:00.559
<v Speaker 5>investing into technology to get further efficiencies out that is

0:11:00.600 --> 0:11:01.440
<v Speaker 5>in our hands.

0:11:01.600 --> 0:11:03.120
<v Speaker 1>And as long as if.

0:11:03.080 --> 0:11:06.440
<v Speaker 5>I have the chance to further increase my return on

0:11:06.480 --> 0:11:08.280
<v Speaker 5>equity with sort of.

0:11:08.200 --> 0:11:10.960
<v Speaker 1>Say homework, that is always the preferred option.

0:11:11.120 --> 0:11:13.280
<v Speaker 3>So not interested in any local banks that are nearby

0:11:13.360 --> 0:11:14.480
<v Speaker 3>that you might bring out here.

0:11:15.440 --> 0:11:18.000
<v Speaker 5>As I said again, if you can focus on yourself,

0:11:18.080 --> 0:11:20.840
<v Speaker 5>if you can improve your return on equity by applying

0:11:20.880 --> 0:11:23.000
<v Speaker 5>this homework, honestly, it's always the first option.

0:11:23.120 --> 0:11:25.480
<v Speaker 3>There's also a big question here about artificial intelligence and

0:11:25.480 --> 0:11:28.520
<v Speaker 3>how much it's going to alter the size of the staff,

0:11:28.760 --> 0:11:31.520
<v Speaker 3>the way of doing business going forward. Have you seen

0:11:31.559 --> 0:11:35.440
<v Speaker 3>any material changes or advantages from using and adopting artificial

0:11:35.520 --> 0:11:40.360
<v Speaker 3>intelligence of late that have really materially improved profitability.

0:11:39.760 --> 0:11:40.959
<v Speaker 1>Or decreased staff.

0:11:41.520 --> 0:11:43.959
<v Speaker 5>Well, we have many use cases and you can apply

0:11:44.040 --> 0:11:46.880
<v Speaker 5>that across the bank. And the interesting part is it

0:11:46.920 --> 0:11:52.120
<v Speaker 5>actually it actually applies to revenue SI, customer satisfaction, interaction

0:11:52.679 --> 0:11:56.560
<v Speaker 5>risk clients. It applies to efficiency and cost management, and

0:11:56.640 --> 0:11:59.320
<v Speaker 5>also it applies to something which is very important for banks,

0:11:59.520 --> 0:12:02.920
<v Speaker 5>control and regulatory compliance. And in each of these three

0:12:03.000 --> 0:12:05.800
<v Speaker 5>areas we have seen great use cases. If you think

0:12:05.800 --> 0:12:09.800
<v Speaker 5>about also our research department, they started actually applying AI.

0:12:10.200 --> 0:12:13.280
<v Speaker 5>If you think about the precision of research reports, with

0:12:13.400 --> 0:12:15.920
<v Speaker 5>the help of AI got far better. Of course, that

0:12:16.000 --> 0:12:18.880
<v Speaker 5>has an impact in terms of the speed and turnaround

0:12:18.880 --> 0:12:22.680
<v Speaker 5>of research reports. Same actually in other areas when you

0:12:22.720 --> 0:12:27.120
<v Speaker 5>think about operations, the way we can apply AI. Now,

0:12:27.200 --> 0:12:29.640
<v Speaker 5>the really important thing is now that we have a

0:12:29.800 --> 0:12:32.920
<v Speaker 5>structural approach to all these use cases and that we

0:12:32.960 --> 0:12:35.600
<v Speaker 5>have a clear priority where do we prioritize it at first?

0:12:35.800 --> 0:12:38.720
<v Speaker 5>Because you can imagine that everybody in this bank wants

0:12:38.760 --> 0:12:41.400
<v Speaker 5>to apply now, AI, we need to have a clear

0:12:41.440 --> 0:12:44.280
<v Speaker 5>priority of investments. But I think it will be a

0:12:44.320 --> 0:12:47.360
<v Speaker 5>game changer going forward and it will be one of

0:12:47.400 --> 0:12:50.520
<v Speaker 5>the key leavers how to increase profitability of banks.

0:12:52.280 --> 0:12:55.720
<v Speaker 2>Stay with us more Bloomberg Surveillance coming up after this,

0:13:04.600 --> 0:13:07.840
<v Speaker 2>Let's turn to private equity. The Consortium Bank Electronic Arts

0:13:07.840 --> 0:13:09.600
<v Speaker 2>is set to add more than a dozen banks to

0:13:09.640 --> 0:13:13.000
<v Speaker 2>its underwriting group after JP Morgan put up twenty billion

0:13:13.040 --> 0:13:15.640
<v Speaker 2>dollars of debt to bankroll the leverage buyout. The banks

0:13:15.640 --> 0:13:18.200
<v Speaker 2>are inline to share roughly five hundred million dollars in

0:13:18.240 --> 0:13:21.400
<v Speaker 2>fees for arranging the financinc joining us. Now, a man

0:13:21.440 --> 0:13:24.280
<v Speaker 2>who knows something about a leverage buyout, Steve Paluk of

0:13:24.360 --> 0:13:26.240
<v Speaker 2>Being Capital. Steve's good to see it, so it could

0:13:26.240 --> 0:13:29.080
<v Speaker 2>be a good morning. Let's reflect on your time. The

0:13:29.280 --> 0:13:33.120
<v Speaker 2>largest leverage buyo ever before this one was HCA back

0:13:33.160 --> 0:13:35.480
<v Speaker 2>in two thousand and sixty thousand and seven. There are

0:13:35.559 --> 0:13:37.319
<v Speaker 2>you were right there in the middle of it. Despite

0:13:37.360 --> 0:13:39.440
<v Speaker 2>that moment, and how it compares to what we're seeing

0:13:39.480 --> 0:13:40.240
<v Speaker 2>play out now.

0:13:40.120 --> 0:13:40.960
<v Speaker 4>Well, it's really interesting.

0:13:41.000 --> 0:13:44.040
<v Speaker 6>I think that buyout was five billion equity and twenty

0:13:44.080 --> 0:13:47.760
<v Speaker 6>seven billion dollars debt. This buyout is much more equity,

0:13:48.000 --> 0:13:50.360
<v Speaker 6>you know, kind of thirty billion of equity and twenty

0:13:50.360 --> 0:13:52.800
<v Speaker 6>five twenty billion, may thirty five billion of equity. So

0:13:53.960 --> 0:13:55.760
<v Speaker 6>the markets have changed to that extent that you can't

0:13:55.800 --> 0:13:57.959
<v Speaker 6>leverage you much. But the EBA does a little less

0:13:59.080 --> 0:14:02.520
<v Speaker 6>very quality sponsor, and JP Morgan is a very quality bank.

0:14:02.600 --> 0:14:05.760
<v Speaker 6>So they did the deal because of the great growth

0:14:05.960 --> 0:14:09.320
<v Speaker 6>in gaming and media and entertainment, and I think is

0:14:09.320 --> 0:14:10.240
<v Speaker 6>a very solid company.

0:14:10.360 --> 0:14:12.839
<v Speaker 2>You did the tremendously well out of HCA. It needs

0:14:12.840 --> 0:14:14.880
<v Speaker 2>to be very very clear about that. But the timing

0:14:14.920 --> 0:14:17.040
<v Speaker 2>of it is curious. It came right at the peak

0:14:17.040 --> 0:14:19.800
<v Speaker 2>of credit and this is now too. Is that anything

0:14:19.840 --> 0:14:20.640
<v Speaker 2>to be concerned about?

0:14:21.240 --> 0:14:23.720
<v Speaker 6>You know, I'm less concerned about credit right now in

0:14:23.800 --> 0:14:29.440
<v Speaker 6>terms of the private credit markets because the private letters actually.

0:14:29.080 --> 0:14:29.840
<v Speaker 4>Are very good.

0:14:29.960 --> 0:14:32.760
<v Speaker 6>The banks have been very good JP Morgan, especially Bank

0:14:32.800 --> 0:14:35.280
<v Speaker 6>of America, well run, well capitalized banks.

0:14:35.600 --> 0:14:37.440
<v Speaker 4>And private credit is different.

0:14:37.280 --> 0:14:39.840
<v Speaker 6>Than credit from banks because if it does go bad,

0:14:40.480 --> 0:14:42.520
<v Speaker 6>you only write off the equity from people that put

0:14:42.520 --> 0:14:45.440
<v Speaker 6>the equity in. It doesn't have a systemic multiplier effect.

0:14:45.760 --> 0:14:48.080
<v Speaker 6>So I'm less concerned about private credit. What one more

0:14:48.120 --> 0:14:51.320
<v Speaker 6>concerned about is the size of the national debt and

0:14:51.320 --> 0:14:54.400
<v Speaker 6>how much interest we're spending on the national debt. It's

0:14:54.440 --> 0:14:56.400
<v Speaker 6>really interesting if you go back to when I got

0:14:56.400 --> 0:14:59.280
<v Speaker 6>out of business school, there was a huge sturm and

0:14:59.360 --> 0:15:02.600
<v Speaker 6>drawing about the national debt passing one trillion. That's in

0:15:02.680 --> 0:15:05.720
<v Speaker 6>nineteen eighty two, So it took two hundred and fifty

0:15:05.800 --> 0:15:09.000
<v Speaker 6>years to have one trillion of national debt. In the

0:15:09.080 --> 0:15:13.600
<v Speaker 6>last forty years, we now have thirty seven trillion.

0:15:13.600 --> 0:15:15.440
<v Speaker 4>Which is more than the GDPGB.

0:15:15.480 --> 0:15:18.560
<v Speaker 6>It's about thirty trillion, So that concerns me more in

0:15:18.640 --> 0:15:21.240
<v Speaker 6>terms of the impact of the dollar interest rates. Our

0:15:21.560 --> 0:15:24.000
<v Speaker 6>interest from the government now is one of the highest expenditures.

0:15:24.000 --> 0:15:27.280
<v Speaker 6>It's right up there with defense and healthcare. So that

0:15:27.320 --> 0:15:29.040
<v Speaker 6>concerns me more than private credit.

0:15:29.200 --> 0:15:30.840
<v Speaker 2>I Steve, I could probably find you people who a

0:15:30.880 --> 0:15:33.000
<v Speaker 2>consent back in the eighties two, and then in the

0:15:33.040 --> 0:15:35.760
<v Speaker 2>two thousands, and as we went through ten trillion, twenty

0:15:35.760 --> 0:15:37.840
<v Speaker 2>trillion and kept going high, they were concerned all the

0:15:37.840 --> 0:15:39.680
<v Speaker 2>way up. Unfortunately, I say this moment.

0:15:39.480 --> 0:15:42.520
<v Speaker 6>Different, Well, I think I don't know if it is different,

0:15:42.920 --> 0:15:46.560
<v Speaker 6>But in situations like this, it's always okay till it

0:15:46.600 --> 0:15:50.840
<v Speaker 6>isn't okay. So you get used to you pass a trillion. Ever,

0:15:50.960 --> 0:15:53.000
<v Speaker 6>Dirkson had a board up that was counting it up

0:15:53.080 --> 0:15:55.000
<v Speaker 6>at that time, and it passed a trillion, there was

0:15:55.360 --> 0:15:58.800
<v Speaker 6>a huge outcry. Now it's ten trillion, then twenty trillion,

0:15:59.000 --> 0:16:01.800
<v Speaker 6>then thirty trillion. But at some point you've got to

0:16:01.840 --> 0:16:04.040
<v Speaker 6>have some long term plan to pay that money back

0:16:04.080 --> 0:16:06.280
<v Speaker 6>and get that deficit down because it's eating up huge

0:16:06.320 --> 0:16:07.400
<v Speaker 6>amounts of the government budget.

0:16:07.680 --> 0:16:10.000
<v Speaker 4>And as as as the interest rates roll.

0:16:09.960 --> 0:16:11.480
<v Speaker 6>Over, you know, a lot of that is still financing

0:16:11.520 --> 0:16:13.520
<v Speaker 6>the old really low interest rates. They're going to have

0:16:13.560 --> 0:16:15.400
<v Speaker 6>to refinance it at five percent, you know, you know,

0:16:15.520 --> 0:16:18.440
<v Speaker 6>four and a half percent, and then the number goes

0:16:18.520 --> 0:16:18.920
<v Speaker 6>up again.

0:16:19.320 --> 0:16:21.040
<v Speaker 7>Well, when you see what's going on Washington, I want

0:16:21.040 --> 0:16:23.120
<v Speaker 7>to go back to your EA deal. It's not just

0:16:23.160 --> 0:16:25.200
<v Speaker 7>the size and scope that got a ton of people's attention.

0:16:25.680 --> 0:16:28.560
<v Speaker 7>There's concern in Washington given some of the players involved.

0:16:28.800 --> 0:16:30.480
<v Speaker 7>Have you heard from politicians about that.

0:16:30.960 --> 0:16:32.920
<v Speaker 6>I don't think there's been a lot of pushback on

0:16:33.280 --> 0:16:35.400
<v Speaker 6>that and the deal. I think we'll be controlled by

0:16:35.400 --> 0:16:38.160
<v Speaker 6>silver Lake, which is an American, you know, fantastic private

0:16:38.160 --> 0:16:39.280
<v Speaker 6>equity company, but.

0:16:39.400 --> 0:16:41.800
<v Speaker 7>With the Saudi PIF being involved, some people think Jared

0:16:41.840 --> 0:16:44.080
<v Speaker 7>Kushner was brought in just to get the check government

0:16:44.080 --> 0:16:44.960
<v Speaker 7>seal of approval.

0:16:45.600 --> 0:16:47.760
<v Speaker 6>You know, again, I think silver Lake's a fantastic firm

0:16:47.800 --> 0:16:49.680
<v Speaker 6>and they're leading the charge there and so I think

0:16:49.720 --> 0:16:51.600
<v Speaker 6>there's really going to be no concern because they'll be

0:16:51.680 --> 0:16:52.720
<v Speaker 6>calling the shots on the deal.

0:16:52.720 --> 0:16:54.800
<v Speaker 2>And say, if we started this conversation by comparing this

0:16:54.920 --> 0:16:58.480
<v Speaker 2>dale ci in I was six. I seven. Have the

0:16:58.520 --> 0:17:01.080
<v Speaker 2>pose off capits have changed in the last twenty years.

0:17:01.280 --> 0:17:02.240
<v Speaker 4>Yeah? Absolutely.

0:17:03.120 --> 0:17:05.040
<v Speaker 6>You know, when I started out in the industry, there

0:17:05.040 --> 0:17:06.960
<v Speaker 6>was only three or four firms doing this I think

0:17:07.280 --> 0:17:10.760
<v Speaker 6>in general, and it was mostly USA. Now it's global.

0:17:11.920 --> 0:17:16.400
<v Speaker 6>The fund sizes are up probably twenty times from when

0:17:16.400 --> 0:17:20.520
<v Speaker 6>I started. And also you have sovereigns and bid againstucial

0:17:20.560 --> 0:17:24.560
<v Speaker 6>players partnering with private equity, so the dry powder is huge.

0:17:24.720 --> 0:17:26.480
<v Speaker 2>Are there are enough opportunities to go around?

0:17:27.680 --> 0:17:27.840
<v Speaker 4>You know?

0:17:28.240 --> 0:17:30.320
<v Speaker 6>You know I got asked that question in nineteen eighty

0:17:30.400 --> 0:17:38.439
<v Speaker 6>nine again, and I feel like a broken record. Private equity,

0:17:38.480 --> 0:17:41.640
<v Speaker 6>I think is here to stay. The model has really evolved,

0:17:41.680 --> 0:17:44.760
<v Speaker 6>so it really is huge value added to to kind

0:17:44.800 --> 0:17:50.240
<v Speaker 6>of transform companies, make them better, globalize them, build new products,

0:17:50.520 --> 0:17:52.120
<v Speaker 6>and in an environment where you don't have to worry

0:17:52.119 --> 0:17:54.520
<v Speaker 6>about quart of learning. So the model is a very

0:17:54.520 --> 0:17:57.080
<v Speaker 6>good model, and it's only expanded, it's only gotten bigger,

0:17:57.560 --> 0:17:59.600
<v Speaker 6>and I think it'll meet There will be plenty of

0:17:59.600 --> 0:18:01.480
<v Speaker 6>opportunit these for these folks to invest money.

0:18:01.480 --> 0:18:03.760
<v Speaker 2>Well, let's talk about the opportunities now for you and

0:18:03.800 --> 0:18:06.760
<v Speaker 2>how your sport franchise is are going. Starting with Atlanta.

0:18:06.800 --> 0:18:09.040
<v Speaker 2>Steve walked into the room with some Atlanta sneakers with

0:18:09.520 --> 0:18:12.399
<v Speaker 2>the sponsor New Balance. On the relationship between you and

0:18:12.440 --> 0:18:14.719
<v Speaker 2>New balants, can you just debscribe what that's like at

0:18:14.720 --> 0:18:15.080
<v Speaker 2>the moment?

0:18:15.560 --> 0:18:16.159
<v Speaker 4>Fantastic.

0:18:16.640 --> 0:18:19.439
<v Speaker 6>A New Balance is a is kind of a fighting

0:18:19.480 --> 0:18:22.800
<v Speaker 6>brand growing taking a lot of share. They really like

0:18:22.840 --> 0:18:24.919
<v Speaker 6>the Atalanta story because we have the same values. You know,

0:18:25.080 --> 0:18:27.879
<v Speaker 6>we're kind of a fighting brand against your the wanted

0:18:27.880 --> 0:18:32.360
<v Speaker 6>AC one team that you support, and so it's kind

0:18:32.359 --> 0:18:34.719
<v Speaker 6>of a matchmate and having the New Balance is very

0:18:34.720 --> 0:18:37.040
<v Speaker 6>excited about it. We're excited about it. We've just named

0:18:37.040 --> 0:18:39.080
<v Speaker 6>our stadium New Balance Arena. I think it's the first

0:18:39.080 --> 0:18:41.800
<v Speaker 6>arena that New Balance is named. And we're very proud

0:18:41.800 --> 0:18:43.719
<v Speaker 6>to be associated with New Balance as a family company.

0:18:43.960 --> 0:18:45.560
<v Speaker 6>You know, the Package Group is a family company in

0:18:45.560 --> 0:18:47.480
<v Speaker 6>the precossis in Italy, your family companies, so the three

0:18:47.480 --> 0:18:51.880
<v Speaker 6>families have come together and hopefully take to the next level.

0:18:51.920 --> 0:18:53.840
<v Speaker 2>You've done a tremendous job with the same in a franchise.

0:18:53.880 --> 0:18:56.639
<v Speaker 2>Can you just describe the opportunities now that exist in

0:18:56.680 --> 0:18:58.479
<v Speaker 2>the sports world at a time when some people are

0:18:58.480 --> 0:19:00.200
<v Speaker 2>pushing back against funny wish.

0:19:01.280 --> 0:19:04.560
<v Speaker 6>Well, no question valuations or record levels. Why is that

0:19:04.680 --> 0:19:08.760
<v Speaker 6>is because sports is now the only thing left that

0:19:08.840 --> 0:19:10.720
<v Speaker 6>aggregates huge audiences globally.

0:19:11.359 --> 0:19:13.440
<v Speaker 4>And there's been a technology change where.

0:19:13.640 --> 0:19:17.080
<v Speaker 6>When I lived in Holland and in the nineteen seventies,

0:19:17.840 --> 0:19:20.359
<v Speaker 6>you would only get sports scores three days later from

0:19:20.400 --> 0:19:22.879
<v Speaker 6>an international tribune and you could watch anything. Now you

0:19:22.880 --> 0:19:26.399
<v Speaker 6>can watch any team globally. So fans are counted in

0:19:26.440 --> 0:19:28.560
<v Speaker 6>the billions instead of the tens of thousands where they

0:19:28.600 --> 0:19:31.520
<v Speaker 6>used to be thirty years ago. So I think sports

0:19:31.520 --> 0:19:34.400
<v Speaker 6>still has upside because advertisers, you don't want to reach

0:19:34.440 --> 0:19:35.760
<v Speaker 6>the globe and that's the way to do it.

0:19:35.840 --> 0:19:38.359
<v Speaker 2>As you look at the sports world and it's pretty broad.

0:19:39.000 --> 0:19:41.520
<v Speaker 2>Where do you see the best opportunity right now? Because

0:19:41.560 --> 0:19:43.480
<v Speaker 2>your name's been linked to a team in the WNBA,

0:19:43.600 --> 0:19:45.360
<v Speaker 2>I know you wanted to bring a team up to Boston.

0:19:45.800 --> 0:19:48.720
<v Speaker 2>Is that where you're looking stale or is it outsewere Well, we're.

0:19:48.520 --> 0:19:52.080
<v Speaker 6>Looking at many opportunities. I think the WNBA is a

0:19:52.080 --> 0:19:55.320
<v Speaker 6>great opportunity. Women's sports and general women's soccer in the

0:19:55.400 --> 0:19:57.320
<v Speaker 6>USA and globally is growing.

0:19:58.240 --> 0:19:59.960
<v Speaker 4>The NFL is the market proper.

0:20:00.240 --> 0:20:02.960
<v Speaker 6>I think they've had record ratings and record advertising on

0:20:03.000 --> 0:20:05.600
<v Speaker 6>the NFL. So again, I think sports as a category

0:20:06.640 --> 0:20:09.520
<v Speaker 6>is really a growth asset, and as you have this

0:20:09.640 --> 0:20:13.760
<v Speaker 6>battle between old media and new media, it's ex extential

0:20:13.760 --> 0:20:16.280
<v Speaker 6>for them and they're battling over these properties that get

0:20:16.320 --> 0:20:17.040
<v Speaker 6>all the eyeballs in.

0:20:17.080 --> 0:20:18.800
<v Speaker 4>So I think that bodes well for all the leagues.

0:20:19.000 --> 0:20:22.280
<v Speaker 7>John mentioned the WA Connecticut team. Do you think that

0:20:22.320 --> 0:20:25.200
<v Speaker 7>there potentially could be a future for you and that team.

0:20:26.200 --> 0:20:26.880
<v Speaker 4>That's something clear.

0:20:26.920 --> 0:20:30.159
<v Speaker 6>We've kind of stood down for now and we're going

0:20:30.160 --> 0:20:32.080
<v Speaker 6>to abide by whatever the NBA wants to do with

0:20:32.080 --> 0:20:36.119
<v Speaker 6>the team. I think it's very exciting. The ratings are

0:20:36.200 --> 0:20:38.840
<v Speaker 6>huge for WNBA, and I think it's great that all

0:20:39.400 --> 0:20:41.840
<v Speaker 6>Americans are following that sport now and it's going to

0:20:41.920 --> 0:20:43.359
<v Speaker 6>it's going to really take off, and the NBA has

0:20:43.359 --> 0:20:44.160
<v Speaker 6>done a great job.

0:20:43.960 --> 0:20:45.800
<v Speaker 2>With that You've done a great job, Stafe. It's always

0:20:45.840 --> 0:20:46.600
<v Speaker 2>going to catch up with you.

0:20:46.680 --> 0:20:47.200
<v Speaker 1>What a career.

0:20:47.359 --> 0:20:49.560
<v Speaker 2>It's those you have in the best of times now.

0:20:50.280 --> 0:20:52.720
<v Speaker 6>You know, I've been very fortunate, you know, coming my

0:20:52.760 --> 0:20:56.000
<v Speaker 6>grandfather came from Italy on a boat with one suitcase

0:20:56.440 --> 0:20:58.240
<v Speaker 6>and worked in a shoe factory here in New York

0:20:58.240 --> 0:21:00.680
<v Speaker 6>and the Bronx for eight dollars a week. So I

0:21:00.680 --> 0:21:03.600
<v Speaker 6>would say America is a great place coming from that.

0:21:03.720 --> 0:21:07.600
<v Speaker 6>And I've loved the homecoming, coming back to Italy with Atalanta.

0:21:08.080 --> 0:21:10.280
<v Speaker 6>I get off the plane and I love it because

0:21:10.280 --> 0:21:11.080
<v Speaker 6>everyone looks like me.

0:21:11.119 --> 0:21:11.439
<v Speaker 1>There.

0:21:12.600 --> 0:21:16.120
<v Speaker 2>Stay with us. More Bloomberg surveillance coming up after this.

0:21:25.080 --> 0:21:28.640
<v Speaker 2>The ten year below four percent at three ninety nine,

0:21:28.680 --> 0:21:31.560
<v Speaker 2>Steve schuttev Missua right in the following. This is the

0:21:31.680 --> 0:21:33.800
<v Speaker 2>minimum level of rates you would expect if the Fed

0:21:33.880 --> 0:21:37.080
<v Speaker 2>were credible in its inflation target. At four percent, the

0:21:37.119 --> 0:21:39.480
<v Speaker 2>yield on the tenure is fully priced for an economy

0:21:39.520 --> 0:21:42.880
<v Speaker 2>with little to no inflation risk. Steve joined us now

0:21:42.880 --> 0:21:44.960
<v Speaker 2>for more. Steve, goodmnic good morning. Do you think we

0:21:44.960 --> 0:21:47.000
<v Speaker 2>should be priced for an economy with little to no

0:21:47.480 --> 0:21:48.320
<v Speaker 2>inflation risk?

0:21:48.480 --> 0:21:49.000
<v Speaker 4>No, I don't.

0:21:49.600 --> 0:21:52.119
<v Speaker 8>I think there is more inflation risk in the system

0:21:52.480 --> 0:21:55.280
<v Speaker 8>than the markets are currently pricing in. But I think

0:21:55.280 --> 0:21:57.720
<v Speaker 8>the markets are pricing in the degree of excess liquidity

0:21:57.760 --> 0:21:59.960
<v Speaker 8>that's still there. Even though we're seeing some you know,

0:22:00.119 --> 0:22:03.560
<v Speaker 8>chinks in the armor in terms of the quantitative approach

0:22:03.600 --> 0:22:05.240
<v Speaker 8>here and what's happening in terms of some of the

0:22:05.280 --> 0:22:08.320
<v Speaker 8>reverse repo areas, there's still an enormous amount of liquidity.

0:22:08.359 --> 0:22:10.200
<v Speaker 4>And you see the way it trade.

0:22:10.200 --> 0:22:12.879
<v Speaker 8>The market traded this week, especially you know, earlier in

0:22:12.920 --> 0:22:14.880
<v Speaker 8>the week and the credit story when we're worried about

0:22:14.920 --> 0:22:18.280
<v Speaker 8>banks initially, and then we saw the Goldman issue come

0:22:18.280 --> 0:22:22.160
<v Speaker 8>out and the market was substantially over subscribed for that issue.

0:22:22.240 --> 0:22:25.400
<v Speaker 8>While we're worried about banks, and so I think there's

0:22:25.440 --> 0:22:27.520
<v Speaker 8>still an enormous amount of liquidity, and I think that's

0:22:27.520 --> 0:22:29.800
<v Speaker 8>holding down the long end of the curve. Plus there's

0:22:29.840 --> 0:22:32.280
<v Speaker 8>the global deflation story that's holding down the long end

0:22:32.280 --> 0:22:33.000
<v Speaker 8>of the curve as well.

0:22:33.040 --> 0:22:35.520
<v Speaker 7>When you see inflation risk, do you mean tariffs or

0:22:35.520 --> 0:22:37.080
<v Speaker 7>are you seeing inflation in other parts?

0:22:37.440 --> 0:22:38.919
<v Speaker 8>Well, I mean we've got to fed a reserve that

0:22:39.000 --> 0:22:41.840
<v Speaker 8>wants to maintain full employment, and we have an economy

0:22:41.880 --> 0:22:45.720
<v Speaker 8>where we are seeing inflation without much tariff running at

0:22:45.760 --> 0:22:48.919
<v Speaker 8>well above its target, running closer to three percent, So

0:22:49.119 --> 0:22:51.159
<v Speaker 8>you would sit there and say, okay, then there is

0:22:51.359 --> 0:22:53.840
<v Speaker 8>inflation risk in there that's not being priced in. Now

0:22:53.880 --> 0:22:56.639
<v Speaker 8>you could say the tenure is expecting on average the

0:22:56.640 --> 0:22:59.080
<v Speaker 8>FED to be credible over a ten year period of time.

0:22:59.280 --> 0:22:59.520
<v Speaker 4>True.

0:22:59.560 --> 0:23:03.200
<v Speaker 8>However, we have been above two percent for four plus years,

0:23:04.040 --> 0:23:06.600
<v Speaker 8>so there starts to be a window there where this is.

0:23:06.520 --> 0:23:07.960
<v Speaker 4>A fully priced market.

0:23:08.160 --> 0:23:10.000
<v Speaker 8>And I think that's part of the reason why we

0:23:10.040 --> 0:23:13.240
<v Speaker 8>had this rally yesterday afternoon and then we've pulled back

0:23:13.359 --> 0:23:16.320
<v Speaker 8>towards that four percent level, because it is a critical

0:23:16.400 --> 0:23:20.200
<v Speaker 8>psychological level, and it's also a critical mathematical level because

0:23:20.200 --> 0:23:21.440
<v Speaker 8>it's a two percent inflation rate.

0:23:21.480 --> 0:23:23.479
<v Speaker 2>Why is it critical psychological.

0:23:23.000 --> 0:23:26.960
<v Speaker 8>Level Because it's an environment in which, when you look

0:23:27.000 --> 0:23:29.399
<v Speaker 8>at most people who've been in the marketplace, if you

0:23:29.480 --> 0:23:32.800
<v Speaker 8>break through four percent, you're usually looking at a substantial

0:23:32.800 --> 0:23:36.440
<v Speaker 8>move below that because something has gone wrong in the system.

0:23:37.359 --> 0:23:40.040
<v Speaker 8>And that's why you had so much of a response

0:23:40.119 --> 0:23:44.920
<v Speaker 8>to yesterday's announcements by Zion and so forth in terms

0:23:44.960 --> 0:23:47.840
<v Speaker 8>of the way the market's knee jerk response took place

0:23:47.880 --> 0:23:49.800
<v Speaker 8>on that. And now we're starting to see the pullback

0:23:50.080 --> 0:23:52.919
<v Speaker 8>as we begin to realize it's more idiosyncratic than it

0:23:52.960 --> 0:23:54.239
<v Speaker 8>is systemic.

0:23:54.040 --> 0:23:56.240
<v Speaker 2>And we've bounced back big time. The broader recory market

0:23:56.280 --> 0:23:58.320
<v Speaker 2>has too. We'll be tracking that. I want to stay

0:23:58.320 --> 0:24:00.960
<v Speaker 2>on course for the federal reservance downtrack with you. This

0:24:01.160 --> 0:24:03.480
<v Speaker 2>FED and the recent decisions, and the next one too

0:24:03.600 --> 0:24:06.480
<v Speaker 2>is anchored to a massive step down at payrolls. What

0:24:06.600 --> 0:24:09.000
<v Speaker 2>do you think they should be anchoring these decisions too.

0:24:09.720 --> 0:24:12.800
<v Speaker 8>I think they should be setting it up as an

0:24:12.800 --> 0:24:16.439
<v Speaker 8>insurance policy standpoint, and I think they should be setting

0:24:16.480 --> 0:24:19.280
<v Speaker 8>it up in an environment in which they want to

0:24:19.320 --> 0:24:23.320
<v Speaker 8>make sure that they are achieving still full employment. That's

0:24:23.359 --> 0:24:26.160
<v Speaker 8>what they say their target is. And I think if

0:24:26.160 --> 0:24:30.000
<v Speaker 8>you wind up getting an unemployment rate movement that goes

0:24:30.320 --> 0:24:33.560
<v Speaker 8>against their need to cut interest rates, that I think

0:24:33.600 --> 0:24:34.320
<v Speaker 8>they should pause.

0:24:34.680 --> 0:24:37.200
<v Speaker 2>So this is a risk management decision, correct, That's kind

0:24:37.200 --> 0:24:39.000
<v Speaker 2>of what they're doing, isn't it. How much daylight is

0:24:39.000 --> 0:24:41.399
<v Speaker 2>there between you and what they're doing right now?

0:24:42.119 --> 0:24:43.000
<v Speaker 4>There's not a lot.

0:24:43.080 --> 0:24:46.920
<v Speaker 8>I mean, after the payroll employment numbers came out in August,

0:24:46.960 --> 0:24:49.320
<v Speaker 8>we were I was on this call and we talked

0:24:49.320 --> 0:24:50.879
<v Speaker 8>about the fact that they might as well just do

0:24:51.040 --> 0:24:54.440
<v Speaker 8>three September, October and December, and it looks as if

0:24:54.440 --> 0:24:55.879
<v Speaker 8>that's what we're going to get out of it, and

0:24:55.880 --> 0:24:56.600
<v Speaker 8>that will.

0:24:56.359 --> 0:24:58.360
<v Speaker 2>Pull us back into from my.

0:24:58.520 --> 0:25:03.399
<v Speaker 8>Calculations, a margin least stimulative monetary policy standpoint for the market.

0:25:03.400 --> 0:25:05.920
<v Speaker 8>They still have to get to three percent to be neutral.

0:25:06.240 --> 0:25:09.880
<v Speaker 8>For me, four percent is neutral. So if we get

0:25:09.920 --> 0:25:12.000
<v Speaker 8>to that level of three and three quarters or so

0:25:12.720 --> 0:25:15.200
<v Speaker 8>on the tenure note, then we're into a stimulative territory.

0:25:15.240 --> 0:25:17.480
<v Speaker 7>If they're biases to the labor market, yes, what do

0:25:17.520 --> 0:25:19.000
<v Speaker 7>they do with how the labor market report?

0:25:20.440 --> 0:25:22.960
<v Speaker 8>Well, I mean, as the chairman indicated the other day,

0:25:23.000 --> 0:25:25.399
<v Speaker 8>they have the ADP numbers, They could look at some

0:25:25.440 --> 0:25:27.879
<v Speaker 8>of the weekly claims numbers, they can look at some

0:25:27.960 --> 0:25:30.160
<v Speaker 8>of the continuing claims numbers. They can do some work

0:25:30.440 --> 0:25:33.760
<v Speaker 8>and adding those things up and making those kind of assessments.

0:25:34.480 --> 0:25:36.600
<v Speaker 8>And I think you basically have to take onto consideration

0:25:36.680 --> 0:25:38.639
<v Speaker 8>that there's a lot of uncertainty.

0:25:38.600 --> 0:25:39.720
<v Speaker 4>Built into this situation.

0:25:39.840 --> 0:25:40.520
<v Speaker 1>If you look at the.

0:25:40.440 --> 0:25:41.159
<v Speaker 4>Wall of worry.

0:25:41.200 --> 0:25:44.520
<v Speaker 8>I mean, we've got a government shutdown, we've got the

0:25:45.119 --> 0:25:49.680
<v Speaker 8>tariff situation, we've got the Chinese trade war negotiations.

0:25:49.720 --> 0:25:51.439
<v Speaker 4>In terms of our CALP call of that or not.

0:25:52.080 --> 0:25:55.919
<v Speaker 8>We've got the Middle East hostilities, We've got the Ukrainian hostilities,

0:25:55.920 --> 0:25:58.520
<v Speaker 8>We've got a government shutdown that doesn't look as if

0:25:58.520 --> 0:26:02.320
<v Speaker 8>it's going away. We have the upcoming question as to

0:26:02.359 --> 0:26:04.800
<v Speaker 8>whether or not of the TERRORIFFTSHO are legal or nothing.

0:26:04.800 --> 0:26:07.520
<v Speaker 7>So why why not go on pause then for October

0:26:07.600 --> 0:26:09.160
<v Speaker 7>and recalibrate for the end of the year.

0:26:09.560 --> 0:26:11.680
<v Speaker 8>I think you want to make sure if there is

0:26:11.720 --> 0:26:14.159
<v Speaker 8>something wrong, you get it in in October so that

0:26:14.240 --> 0:26:16.360
<v Speaker 8>you make sure there's a good fourth quarter of the year.

0:26:17.080 --> 0:26:19.280
<v Speaker 2>Steve, I've got no idea what happens in man beyond

0:26:19.560 --> 0:26:21.280
<v Speaker 2>because we don't know what the leadership of the Federal

0:26:21.240 --> 0:26:23.639
<v Speaker 2>Reserve looks like. But do you think markets might be

0:26:23.720 --> 0:26:26.880
<v Speaker 2>underappreciating the potential for a pause from the new year

0:26:26.960 --> 0:26:27.400
<v Speaker 2>up to May?

0:26:28.160 --> 0:26:28.320
<v Speaker 5>Oh?

0:26:28.359 --> 0:26:32.040
<v Speaker 8>I think the market definitely is underestimating the potential not

0:26:32.119 --> 0:26:33.119
<v Speaker 8>to get to three percent.

0:26:33.240 --> 0:26:38.120
<v Speaker 2>Yes, stay with us. More Bloomberg surveillance coming up after this.

0:26:47.000 --> 0:26:49.040
<v Speaker 2>Let's stick with the data. CPI could be the only

0:26:49.080 --> 0:26:51.760
<v Speaker 2>government print the Fed gets ahead of the rate decision

0:26:51.800 --> 0:26:54.159
<v Speaker 2>later on this month. Mark Hayfley of UPS, writing with

0:26:54.200 --> 0:26:56.439
<v Speaker 2>the Fed on track to continue its rate cutting cycle,

0:26:56.760 --> 0:26:59.439
<v Speaker 2>we believe the case for quality fixed income as a

0:26:59.440 --> 0:27:03.360
<v Speaker 2>source of fullier resilience remained strong. Mark John, Just now

0:27:03.359 --> 0:27:05.600
<v Speaker 2>for more, Mike, welcome back, sir. Let's just talk about

0:27:05.600 --> 0:27:08.840
<v Speaker 2>that income. Over the last week or so, they yield

0:27:08.920 --> 0:27:10.800
<v Speaker 2>is just slipping away from us. Mark, what do you

0:27:10.840 --> 0:27:12.120
<v Speaker 2>think is driving that story?

0:27:13.480 --> 0:27:17.640
<v Speaker 9>Well, I mean it's a lot of factors. I think First,

0:27:17.760 --> 0:27:21.720
<v Speaker 9>we do have some you know, some concerns out there

0:27:21.800 --> 0:27:24.760
<v Speaker 9>about the labor market and other things. But you know,

0:27:24.800 --> 0:27:27.000
<v Speaker 9>we've got a FED that's going to cut. And then

0:27:27.040 --> 0:27:31.440
<v Speaker 9>I do think this QT story is also important to

0:27:31.520 --> 0:27:34.560
<v Speaker 9>this because you know, that was a huge factor perhaps

0:27:34.680 --> 0:27:39.119
<v Speaker 9>in creating some of those term premiums. So that side

0:27:39.119 --> 0:27:41.159
<v Speaker 9>of it seems to be be coming together.

0:27:41.760 --> 0:27:43.520
<v Speaker 2>S and P five hundred target for you and a

0:27:43.560 --> 0:27:47.120
<v Speaker 2>team midyear next year seventy three hundred, Mark, What needs

0:27:47.160 --> 0:27:48.720
<v Speaker 2>to go right to get us from where we are

0:27:48.960 --> 0:27:49.640
<v Speaker 2>to get us there?

0:27:51.200 --> 0:27:54.280
<v Speaker 9>Yeah? Well, first, anybody who's in the equity market does

0:27:54.359 --> 0:27:57.399
<v Speaker 9>have a call on AI, whether they like it or not.

0:27:57.760 --> 0:28:02.200
<v Speaker 9>And we think that the cap can continue into next year.

0:28:02.560 --> 0:28:06.359
<v Speaker 9>That's one thing. Second, again, don't fight the FED. Third,

0:28:06.440 --> 0:28:10.440
<v Speaker 9>the earnings are looking good. And fourth, the one big

0:28:10.480 --> 0:28:13.720
<v Speaker 9>beautiful bill is going to start to add some stimulus

0:28:13.760 --> 0:28:17.080
<v Speaker 9>as we get into next year. So that's that looks

0:28:17.119 --> 0:28:18.399
<v Speaker 9>like a positive backdrop to.

0:28:18.480 --> 0:28:22.080
<v Speaker 7>Us, even you're constructive on AI. Do you have any

0:28:22.119 --> 0:28:26.040
<v Speaker 7>sort of concerns about the vendor financing that's happening within

0:28:26.080 --> 0:28:26.600
<v Speaker 7>this space?

0:28:28.400 --> 0:28:31.480
<v Speaker 9>Well, you know, twenty six years ago I sat down

0:28:31.800 --> 0:28:35.760
<v Speaker 9>and was writing to clients about the dot com bubble,

0:28:36.280 --> 0:28:40.320
<v Speaker 9>and so writing this month was you know, brought back

0:28:40.400 --> 0:28:44.640
<v Speaker 9>some memory. So yes, you know, I think that I remember,

0:28:45.280 --> 0:28:47.400
<v Speaker 9>you know, some of the circular financing of the dot

0:28:47.440 --> 0:28:51.960
<v Speaker 9>com very well. And you know, I think that it's

0:28:52.000 --> 0:28:58.040
<v Speaker 9>still early stages. Obviously, you know, it's getting somebody's concerned

0:28:58.160 --> 0:29:02.080
<v Speaker 9>enough that it's getting disclosed, and it's definitely something to watch.

0:29:02.960 --> 0:29:04.800
<v Speaker 9>We just have to see where it goes from here.

0:29:05.560 --> 0:29:07.680
<v Speaker 7>Mark, when it comes to what we had this morning,

0:29:07.680 --> 0:29:11.720
<v Speaker 7>which was the bank sector under pressure given the concerns

0:29:11.720 --> 0:29:15.560
<v Speaker 7>of these bankruptcies and credit qualities, do you think that

0:29:15.640 --> 0:29:18.840
<v Speaker 7>this could potentially be a longer term problem within this

0:29:18.960 --> 0:29:22.000
<v Speaker 7>space and that can affect and have contagion across the

0:29:22.000 --> 0:29:23.200
<v Speaker 7>border market.

0:29:25.440 --> 0:29:26.160
<v Speaker 1>On the banks.

0:29:26.320 --> 0:29:28.600
<v Speaker 9>On the banks, we're you know, we're looking at the

0:29:28.640 --> 0:29:33.280
<v Speaker 9>delinquency rates. They look like they're okay so far, and

0:29:33.400 --> 0:29:36.680
<v Speaker 9>so we're still thinking this is kind of a one

0:29:36.760 --> 0:29:40.160
<v Speaker 9>off and the you know, the globally significant banks, the

0:29:40.240 --> 0:29:42.200
<v Speaker 9>large banks are doing very well.

0:29:42.360 --> 0:29:44.960
<v Speaker 2>It's Altmark that we finished the week talking about these

0:29:45.000 --> 0:29:46.960
<v Speaker 2>issues and I get them, they're import them. We should

0:29:47.000 --> 0:29:49.200
<v Speaker 2>track them on a week when we've just had blowout

0:29:49.280 --> 0:29:51.480
<v Speaker 2>numbers from the big banks on Wall Street. Mark, do

0:29:51.520 --> 0:29:53.040
<v Speaker 2>you see this market as a bit of a market

0:29:53.080 --> 0:29:54.240
<v Speaker 2>of contradictions at the moment?

0:29:55.880 --> 0:29:57.640
<v Speaker 9>Well, you know, I love talking to you on a

0:29:57.680 --> 0:30:00.320
<v Speaker 9>Friday because you're looking back on the week with this

0:30:00.440 --> 0:30:03.640
<v Speaker 9>sense of wonder, almost awe that like all the stuff

0:30:03.680 --> 0:30:06.920
<v Speaker 9>that has happened, And so I agree with you. I mean,

0:30:07.240 --> 0:30:09.920
<v Speaker 9>we've had a heck of a run in the market.

0:30:10.360 --> 0:30:13.240
<v Speaker 9>We don't have a lot of data right now, you know,

0:30:13.360 --> 0:30:18.360
<v Speaker 9>economic data, and so every data point is important. But

0:30:18.440 --> 0:30:20.560
<v Speaker 9>I think as some of the you know, as you highlighted,

0:30:21.240 --> 0:30:23.680
<v Speaker 9>you have to look at everything that's going on from

0:30:23.720 --> 0:30:26.320
<v Speaker 9>what the President is saying to you know, what the

0:30:26.360 --> 0:30:30.480
<v Speaker 9>Fed is saying, to what foreign leaders are saying to

0:30:30.720 --> 0:30:33.480
<v Speaker 9>you know, what you're hearing from companies and put it

0:30:33.520 --> 0:30:36.320
<v Speaker 9>all together in the right matrix.

0:30:36.480 --> 0:30:38.680
<v Speaker 2>The good news is Mark that in bad times bonds

0:30:38.720 --> 0:30:40.920
<v Speaker 2>are working. And I guess the good news for gold

0:30:41.000 --> 0:30:43.360
<v Speaker 2>is that gold works when the market's down and gold

0:30:43.360 --> 0:30:46.040
<v Speaker 2>works when the market's up. This is just a relentless

0:30:46.120 --> 0:30:49.240
<v Speaker 2>rally market. We're on a ninth straight week of gains,

0:30:49.640 --> 0:30:52.400
<v Speaker 2>a run we haven't seen since twenty twenty. This week alone,

0:30:52.400 --> 0:30:54.600
<v Speaker 2>we're up by close to eight percent. I think seven

0:30:54.600 --> 0:30:56.880
<v Speaker 2>point five percent is the number of my Bloomberg terminal

0:30:57.320 --> 0:31:00.000
<v Speaker 2>Right now, Mark, can we just finish that the relationship

0:31:00.040 --> 0:31:02.240
<v Speaker 2>ship between gold and risk. We were touching on this

0:31:02.320 --> 0:31:05.000
<v Speaker 2>when we taught last time. How are you reading these

0:31:05.040 --> 0:31:06.800
<v Speaker 2>moves in gold? What's it all about?

0:31:08.360 --> 0:31:12.880
<v Speaker 9>Well? I think that part of it is feers about

0:31:13.280 --> 0:31:16.560
<v Speaker 9>kind of the dollar and and this this you know,

0:31:16.600 --> 0:31:19.360
<v Speaker 9>and the concerns about debt. But a large part of

0:31:19.400 --> 0:31:22.920
<v Speaker 9>it is the weaponization of the dollar after the Russian

0:31:22.960 --> 0:31:26.880
<v Speaker 9>invasion of Ukraine, the use of sanctions and central banks saying, hey,

0:31:27.400 --> 0:31:32.040
<v Speaker 9>you know, how else can we function that we're not

0:31:32.240 --> 0:31:35.920
<v Speaker 9>necessarily beholden to the dollar system. And we continue to

0:31:35.960 --> 0:31:40.120
<v Speaker 9>see that happening. Obviously we've seen speculatory trades and and

0:31:40.280 --> 0:31:44.640
<v Speaker 9>retail come in on top of those things. But I

0:31:44.640 --> 0:31:47.480
<v Speaker 9>think this this central bank component is key to the story.

0:31:47.680 --> 0:31:51.440
<v Speaker 9>And then of course underpinning this whole rally is the

0:31:51.480 --> 0:31:56.160
<v Speaker 9>continued fiscal spending, deficit spending that that goes on, and

0:31:57.040 --> 0:32:00.400
<v Speaker 9>you know it's don't fight the Fed, but also don't

0:32:00.760 --> 0:32:04.680
<v Speaker 9>fight that tide of money that is stimulating economies around

0:32:04.680 --> 0:32:05.040
<v Speaker 9>the world.

0:32:05.280 --> 0:32:07.480
<v Speaker 2>That's an interesting component of this markt And please you

0:32:07.480 --> 0:32:09.959
<v Speaker 2>mentioned the central bank diversification of the back of what

0:32:10.000 --> 0:32:13.640
<v Speaker 2>happened with Russia, because that's been a source a massive

0:32:13.680 --> 0:32:16.640
<v Speaker 2>tail went for this story. A non yielding assets perform

0:32:16.720 --> 0:32:20.000
<v Speaker 2>so well in an otherwise high interest rate environment. Marcus,

0:32:20.040 --> 0:32:22.080
<v Speaker 2>we start to reduce interest rates to the federal reserve,

0:32:22.240 --> 0:32:24.160
<v Speaker 2>is that just more fuel for the next leg of

0:32:24.200 --> 0:32:25.600
<v Speaker 2>the trade And what kind of numbers are you and

0:32:25.640 --> 0:32:26.440
<v Speaker 2>the team considering?

0:32:27.600 --> 0:32:31.480
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, it normally would be, but I think that given

0:32:31.560 --> 0:32:34.400
<v Speaker 9>this run, you know, from here, we're a little cautious

0:32:34.720 --> 0:32:39.080
<v Speaker 9>and thinking more of gold as a hedge against potential

0:32:39.800 --> 0:32:42.480
<v Speaker 9>risks that pop up, rather than saying, hey, this is

0:32:42.480 --> 0:32:45.480
<v Speaker 9>a great to great time to pile in for kind

0:32:45.480 --> 0:32:47.640
<v Speaker 9>of speculative gains or trading gains.

0:32:48.480 --> 0:32:52.040
<v Speaker 2>This is the Bloomberg Sevendents podcast bringing you the best

0:32:52.040 --> 0:32:55.360
<v Speaker 2>in markets economics. Anngio politics. You can watch the show

0:32:55.400 --> 0:32:58.360
<v Speaker 2>live on Bloomberg TV weekday mornings from six am to

0:32:58.480 --> 0:33:02.480
<v Speaker 2>nine am Eastern, to the podcast on Apple, Spotify, or

0:33:02.520 --> 0:33:05.120
<v Speaker 2>anywhere else you listen, and as always, on the Bloomberg

0:33:05.200 --> 0:33:07.040
<v Speaker 2>Terminal and the Bloomberg Business app.

0:33:11.080 --> 0:33:11.600
<v Speaker 9>Mm hmm