WEBVTT - State Created Danger

0:00:01.680 --> 0:00:02.880
<v Speaker 1>Cool zone media.

0:00:06.240 --> 0:00:11.080
<v Speaker 2>What happens when a Nazi rally comes to town. Maybe

0:00:11.080 --> 0:00:14.480
<v Speaker 2>it's a little different from town to town, But as

0:00:14.520 --> 0:00:18.079
<v Speaker 2>a resident of Charlottesville, Virginia, I've spent the last eight

0:00:18.160 --> 0:00:22.240
<v Speaker 2>years trying to answer that question. In one very particular instance,

0:00:23.560 --> 0:00:26.520
<v Speaker 2>they Unite the Right rally on August twelfth, twenty seventeen.

0:00:28.120 --> 0:00:31.240
<v Speaker 2>It didn't take eight years to find the obvious answer

0:00:31.320 --> 0:00:34.960
<v Speaker 2>to that question. It's violence. Before the day of the

0:00:35.040 --> 0:00:38.559
<v Speaker 2>rally even dawned, there was violence. There was violence at

0:00:38.600 --> 0:00:41.120
<v Speaker 2>rallies all over the country in the months leading up

0:00:41.159 --> 0:00:44.879
<v Speaker 2>to August twelfth, violence encouraged by and at the hands

0:00:44.880 --> 0:00:48.159
<v Speaker 2>of the men who were busy organizing the event that

0:00:48.240 --> 0:00:51.800
<v Speaker 2>would cap off what they called the Summer of hate.

0:00:52.840 --> 0:00:55.960
<v Speaker 2>And when the day finally came, the violence they'd been

0:00:55.960 --> 0:00:59.520
<v Speaker 2>promising to deliver all summer left blood in our streets,

0:01:00.960 --> 0:01:04.760
<v Speaker 2>but not a single speech was made that day. Fights

0:01:04.760 --> 0:01:07.479
<v Speaker 2>broke out in the streets as rallygoers arrived at the park.

0:01:08.840 --> 0:01:13.440
<v Speaker 2>Police watched and waited as neo Nazis who'd taken cross

0:01:13.440 --> 0:01:19.680
<v Speaker 2>country flights looking for a fight, hunched, kicked, bludgeoned, and,

0:01:19.840 --> 0:01:23.600
<v Speaker 2>in at least one instance, choked, counter protesters who stood

0:01:23.600 --> 0:01:28.960
<v Speaker 2>in their way. The rally itself never even really happened.

0:01:30.000 --> 0:01:32.679
<v Speaker 2>Police dispersed the crowd before it ever really got started,

0:01:33.680 --> 0:01:36.120
<v Speaker 2>and it had already been over for hours when one

0:01:36.200 --> 0:01:39.160
<v Speaker 2>man who'd hoped to attend it took his revenge on

0:01:39.200 --> 0:01:44.360
<v Speaker 2>the counter demonstrators, murdering heather Hire and injuring dozens of others.

0:01:45.280 --> 0:01:48.200
<v Speaker 2>And I'll tell you some of those stories one of

0:01:48.240 --> 0:01:52.600
<v Speaker 2>these days. There were a handful of criminal prosecutions, and

0:01:52.680 --> 0:01:56.080
<v Speaker 2>I spent years sitting quietly on a wooden bench, watching

0:01:56.120 --> 0:02:01.200
<v Speaker 2>and dutifully taking notes. But those cases, for the most part,

0:02:01.840 --> 0:02:05.919
<v Speaker 2>were pretty open and shut, and they were resolved fairly

0:02:06.000 --> 0:02:08.280
<v Speaker 2>quickly by the standards of the court.

0:02:10.000 --> 0:02:11.280
<v Speaker 1>The civil lawsuits took.

0:02:11.200 --> 0:02:16.960
<v Speaker 2>Longer, years longer, and they often raised more questions than

0:02:16.960 --> 0:02:21.280
<v Speaker 2>they answered, questions the court is perhaps not equipped to answer.

0:02:22.800 --> 0:02:25.560
<v Speaker 2>But the Court has been quite clear on one question

0:02:25.639 --> 0:02:31.320
<v Speaker 2>in particular, one raised by several different lawsuits. Do the

0:02:31.320 --> 0:02:38.680
<v Speaker 2>police have an obligation to protect anyone? The answer is no.

0:02:41.919 --> 0:03:02.440
<v Speaker 2>I'm Molly Conquer, and this is weird, Blue Guys. This

0:03:02.520 --> 0:03:05.120
<v Speaker 2>wasn't the episode I meant to write this week. I

0:03:05.200 --> 0:03:08.240
<v Speaker 2>was working on something else, entirely, something I'm still working on.

0:03:09.000 --> 0:03:11.279
<v Speaker 2>When I realized it was a longer and more complicated

0:03:11.360 --> 0:03:13.040
<v Speaker 2>narrative than I felt like I could get my arms

0:03:13.040 --> 0:03:16.160
<v Speaker 2>around this week, so I set it aside and started

0:03:16.200 --> 0:03:18.239
<v Speaker 2>scrambling at the eleventh hour for something I thought I

0:03:18.280 --> 0:03:21.160
<v Speaker 2>could pull together quickly, something I already know a lot

0:03:21.160 --> 0:03:24.200
<v Speaker 2>about and won't lose myself for days trying to do

0:03:24.200 --> 0:03:27.680
<v Speaker 2>a lot of new research. But then I saw a

0:03:27.720 --> 0:03:34.400
<v Speaker 2>blog post from an attorney, Glenn Keith. Allen is a

0:03:34.440 --> 0:03:37.000
<v Speaker 2>man whose story should be told on its own, and

0:03:37.040 --> 0:03:39.880
<v Speaker 2>I think I will eventually, So I won't tell you

0:03:39.920 --> 0:03:43.480
<v Speaker 2>more than you need to know here. I'm very comfortable

0:03:43.520 --> 0:03:47.400
<v Speaker 2>describing him as a neo Nazi lawyer. That's what the

0:03:47.440 --> 0:03:49.760
<v Speaker 2>Southern Poverty Law Center called him in a headline of

0:03:49.800 --> 0:03:53.320
<v Speaker 2>an article published in twenty sixteen, when they revealed that

0:03:53.360 --> 0:03:56.800
<v Speaker 2>the attorney working for the Baltimore Police Department had been

0:03:56.800 --> 0:03:59.440
<v Speaker 2>a dues paying member of the neo Nazi group National

0:03:59.440 --> 0:04:01.640
<v Speaker 2>Alliance for decades.

0:04:02.880 --> 0:04:03.040
<v Speaker 1>Now.

0:04:03.040 --> 0:04:05.360
<v Speaker 2>The SBLC has done a lot of great work over

0:04:05.360 --> 0:04:08.440
<v Speaker 2>the years, But I don't mean to say that my

0:04:08.560 --> 0:04:14.760
<v Speaker 2>ironclad certainty here comes only from repeating their claim. No, No,

0:04:14.880 --> 0:04:18.120
<v Speaker 2>I'm very sure that I can say that Glenn Allen

0:04:18.279 --> 0:04:22.400
<v Speaker 2>is a neo Nazi lawyer because he unsuccessfully sued the

0:04:22.480 --> 0:04:27.800
<v Speaker 2>SPLC for defamation. In the memorandum dismissing his suit, the

0:04:27.880 --> 0:04:31.320
<v Speaker 2>judge notes that not only had Allan failed to show

0:04:31.400 --> 0:04:34.040
<v Speaker 2>there was any falsehood in the claims that had been

0:04:34.040 --> 0:04:37.880
<v Speaker 2>made by the SBLC, he didn't even appear to be

0:04:38.000 --> 0:04:42.280
<v Speaker 2>disputing the claim that he was in fact a neo Nazi.

0:04:43.839 --> 0:04:45.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean, there's that, and.

0:04:45.200 --> 0:04:47.159
<v Speaker 2>There is also the fact that he spent the last

0:04:47.160 --> 0:04:50.159
<v Speaker 2>couple of years being the go to guy when neo

0:04:50.240 --> 0:04:54.799
<v Speaker 2>Nazis need a lawyer. He's represented members of Patriot Front

0:04:54.839 --> 0:04:58.120
<v Speaker 2>in lawsuits in Virginia and Washington State and in their

0:04:58.160 --> 0:05:01.880
<v Speaker 2>criminal cases in Idaho. He currently represents members of the

0:05:01.920 --> 0:05:06.040
<v Speaker 2>Goyam Defense League in a lawsuit in Georgia. He's represented

0:05:06.080 --> 0:05:10.600
<v Speaker 2>white supremacist publications American Renaissance and v DARE. He was

0:05:10.680 --> 0:05:13.320
<v Speaker 2>hired by Nathan Dimigo, the former leader of the neo

0:05:13.360 --> 0:05:16.960
<v Speaker 2>Nazi group Identity Europa, in his ongoing effort to use

0:05:17.000 --> 0:05:20.000
<v Speaker 2>a bankruptcy case to evade paying damages to the victims

0:05:20.000 --> 0:05:23.560
<v Speaker 2>of the United's Right Rally. Allan has also filed petitions

0:05:23.600 --> 0:05:25.520
<v Speaker 2>to the Supreme Court on behalf of members of the

0:05:25.560 --> 0:05:30.039
<v Speaker 2>neo Nazi street fighting gang, the Rise Above movement. And

0:05:30.080 --> 0:05:35.200
<v Speaker 2>then there's the case I'm talking about today. Last week,

0:05:35.839 --> 0:05:39.359
<v Speaker 2>Glenn Allen posted an update to his website to share

0:05:39.400 --> 0:05:45.239
<v Speaker 2>some sad news. He wrote, on April seventh, twenty twenty five,

0:05:45.880 --> 0:05:50.560
<v Speaker 2>the Supreme Court denied our petition. The Court's decision, although

0:05:50.600 --> 0:05:55.039
<v Speaker 2>not surprising, is regrettable. The Court missed an opportunity to

0:05:55.080 --> 0:05:58.600
<v Speaker 2>advance the cause of First Amendment protection for unpopular speech

0:05:59.320 --> 0:06:02.239
<v Speaker 2>and to admonishi the City of Charlottesville for taking sides

0:06:02.279 --> 0:06:08.160
<v Speaker 2>against Warren and the other pro monument protesters. The cases

0:06:08.240 --> 0:06:11.480
<v Speaker 2>talking about was originally filed by Gregory Conti and Warren

0:06:11.560 --> 0:06:16.080
<v Speaker 2>Baylaw in twenty nineteen. Both men had attended the United

0:06:16.120 --> 0:06:19.240
<v Speaker 2>Right rally in Charlesville, Virginia, on August twelfth, twenty seventeen,

0:06:20.080 --> 0:06:23.200
<v Speaker 2>and felt their civil rights had been violated by various

0:06:23.200 --> 0:06:27.560
<v Speaker 2>parties then named as defendants in their lawsuit, the Commonwealth

0:06:27.560 --> 0:06:31.120
<v Speaker 2>of Virginia, the City of Charlesville, the Virginia State Police,

0:06:31.640 --> 0:06:35.279
<v Speaker 2>then Governor of Virginia Terry mccauliffe, the Charlesville Police Department,

0:06:35.680 --> 0:06:39.000
<v Speaker 2>several individual members of both police agencies and city staff,

0:06:39.760 --> 0:06:43.400
<v Speaker 2>as well as the sort of random assortment of individual

0:06:43.440 --> 0:06:48.840
<v Speaker 2>counter protesters. Now I realize as I'm writing this that

0:06:49.640 --> 0:06:53.400
<v Speaker 2>as continuously present as the events of summer twenty seventeen

0:06:53.800 --> 0:06:57.320
<v Speaker 2>have felt here in Charlottesville, I was eight years ago.

0:06:58.560 --> 0:07:02.000
<v Speaker 2>It was national news back then, but it's likely faded

0:07:02.200 --> 0:07:06.640
<v Speaker 2>from the memories of people everywhere else. And if you're

0:07:06.680 --> 0:07:09.520
<v Speaker 2>too young to have been watching the news eight years ago,

0:07:09.840 --> 0:07:14.360
<v Speaker 2>you might never even have known enough to forget. The

0:07:14.440 --> 0:07:20.200
<v Speaker 2>rally was, on its surface about Confederate statues. Back in

0:07:20.240 --> 0:07:23.960
<v Speaker 2>twenty seventeen, that was a pretty hot issue. Granted, a

0:07:24.040 --> 0:07:26.640
<v Speaker 2>lot of people had been voicing opposition to the presence

0:07:26.640 --> 0:07:30.720
<v Speaker 2>of those monuments to racism for a century or so

0:07:30.840 --> 0:07:34.000
<v Speaker 2>since they'd been put up, but it became a subject

0:07:34.000 --> 0:07:38.600
<v Speaker 2>of national concern in twenty fifteen after the Charleston church shooting.

0:07:40.160 --> 0:07:42.559
<v Speaker 2>Cities around the country were starting to talk about taking

0:07:42.600 --> 0:07:47.640
<v Speaker 2>them down, and many did. But here in Virginia, a

0:07:47.680 --> 0:07:50.200
<v Speaker 2>state law stood in the way of local decision making

0:07:50.200 --> 0:07:55.240
<v Speaker 2>on the subject. Local governments needed state permission to take

0:07:55.280 --> 0:07:59.000
<v Speaker 2>down a monument or a memorial to any war. The

0:07:59.080 --> 0:08:03.440
<v Speaker 2>law even species hifically prohibited quote the placement of Union

0:08:03.520 --> 0:08:10.200
<v Speaker 2>markings or monuments on previously designated Confederate memorials. But a

0:08:10.240 --> 0:08:13.720
<v Speaker 2>court ruling in late twenty fifteen seemed to hint that

0:08:13.880 --> 0:08:17.320
<v Speaker 2>perhaps the law could be interpreted to mean that it

0:08:17.400 --> 0:08:21.160
<v Speaker 2>only applied to statues erected after that law was passed,

0:08:22.080 --> 0:08:27.320
<v Speaker 2>which could mean it didn't apply to Charlottesville. That legal

0:08:27.360 --> 0:08:31.040
<v Speaker 2>battle lasted years, and it probably isn't interesting to normal people,

0:08:31.120 --> 0:08:32.800
<v Speaker 2>so I won't get into it. But what you need

0:08:32.840 --> 0:08:37.480
<v Speaker 2>to know here is that in twenty sixteen, the city

0:08:37.480 --> 0:08:41.000
<v Speaker 2>of Charlottesville was starting to take real steps toward trying

0:08:41.040 --> 0:08:43.520
<v Speaker 2>to take down the statues of Robert E. Lee and

0:08:43.559 --> 0:08:50.240
<v Speaker 2>Stonewall Jackson, and some people were very, very angry about it.

0:08:53.120 --> 0:08:56.640
<v Speaker 2>At the end of May twenty seventeen, a local resident

0:08:56.760 --> 0:09:00.079
<v Speaker 2>named Jason Kessler filed an application with the City of

0:09:00.160 --> 0:09:04.120
<v Speaker 2>Charlesville for a special event permit. He wanted to hold

0:09:04.120 --> 0:09:07.280
<v Speaker 2>an event on August twelfth, twenty seventeen, in the park

0:09:07.840 --> 0:09:11.839
<v Speaker 2>where the Roberty Lee statue stood. He described the event

0:09:11.920 --> 0:09:15.000
<v Speaker 2>as a free speech rally in support of the Lee monument,

0:09:16.120 --> 0:09:18.679
<v Speaker 2>and on his application he estimated that about four hundred

0:09:18.679 --> 0:09:23.720
<v Speaker 2>people would attend, but it wasn't about the statues, not

0:09:23.880 --> 0:09:29.600
<v Speaker 2>really not. In the end, this statue was a focal point,

0:09:29.960 --> 0:09:34.840
<v Speaker 2>a rallying cry, a lightning rod. Whatever it was, an excuse,

0:09:35.920 --> 0:09:39.319
<v Speaker 2>it was a breaking point. The men who descended on

0:09:39.400 --> 0:09:42.800
<v Speaker 2>this little college town were here to put black people

0:09:42.800 --> 0:09:46.520
<v Speaker 2>in their place. They were here to fight the Jewish agenda.

0:09:46.559 --> 0:09:48.679
<v Speaker 2>They were here to fist fight Antifa. They were here

0:09:48.720 --> 0:09:53.040
<v Speaker 2>to kill communists. Sure a lot of them were proud

0:09:53.080 --> 0:09:56.760
<v Speaker 2>of their Southern heritage, I guess, but that doesn't really

0:09:56.800 --> 0:10:00.800
<v Speaker 2>help explain the swastika tattoos, does it. Where the months

0:10:00.800 --> 0:10:04.440
<v Speaker 2>of messages exchanged, and a discord server where attendees gleefully

0:10:04.440 --> 0:10:07.800
<v Speaker 2>discussed their fantasies about killing counter protesters.

0:10:09.679 --> 0:10:10.600
<v Speaker 1>There were several.

0:10:10.280 --> 0:10:12.800
<v Speaker 2>Conversations in the discord server about whether it was legal

0:10:13.320 --> 0:10:17.319
<v Speaker 2>to run people over. Memes were posted about plowing through

0:10:17.320 --> 0:10:18.800
<v Speaker 2>a crowd with heavy machinery.

0:10:19.520 --> 0:10:20.440
<v Speaker 1>It was all just a joke.

0:10:21.640 --> 0:10:28.199
<v Speaker 2>Everyone was laughing until someone actually did it. The rally

0:10:28.240 --> 0:10:32.480
<v Speaker 2>was supposed to begin at Nune That's what the permit said.

0:10:32.880 --> 0:10:35.000
<v Speaker 2>Attendees would gather in the park near the statue of

0:10:35.080 --> 0:10:37.880
<v Speaker 2>Roberty Lee, and they would listen to speeches from far

0:10:37.960 --> 0:10:42.040
<v Speaker 2>right micro celebrities like Richard Spencer, Baked Alaska, Christopher Cantwell,

0:10:42.080 --> 0:10:46.520
<v Speaker 2>Augustus and Victus, Matthew Heinbach, and Mike Pinovich. But like

0:10:46.600 --> 0:10:51.199
<v Speaker 2>I said, no one ever gave a speech. The streets

0:10:51.200 --> 0:10:55.520
<v Speaker 2>downtown were packed with counter protesters. At the very last

0:10:55.600 --> 0:10:58.240
<v Speaker 2>minute that morning, the event organizer, who'd been the group's

0:10:58.240 --> 0:11:01.560
<v Speaker 2>police liaison, backed of the agreed upon plan to have

0:11:01.640 --> 0:11:04.680
<v Speaker 2>the scheduled speakers shuttled into the park with a police escort,

0:11:05.880 --> 0:11:08.560
<v Speaker 2>and within an hour of that decision, all hell had

0:11:08.600 --> 0:11:12.320
<v Speaker 2>broken loose in the streets near the park. By eleven

0:11:12.440 --> 0:11:14.839
<v Speaker 2>thirty am, the local police had declared the gathering and

0:11:14.960 --> 0:11:18.760
<v Speaker 2>unlawful assembly. State police and riot years showed up a

0:11:18.760 --> 0:11:22.520
<v Speaker 2>few minutes later to clear the park by force. One

0:11:22.559 --> 0:11:25.160
<v Speaker 2>of the only funny pictures taken that day shows Richard

0:11:25.200 --> 0:11:29.080
<v Speaker 2>Spencer's mid tantrum as he's being shoved out of the

0:11:29.120 --> 0:11:33.240
<v Speaker 2>park by a line of riot cops. There's a lot

0:11:33.280 --> 0:11:35.480
<v Speaker 2>to be said about the months leading up to that

0:11:35.559 --> 0:11:39.120
<v Speaker 2>day in August. Much of it has already been said,

0:11:40.000 --> 0:11:42.240
<v Speaker 2>and some of it I'm sure I'll write some other day,

0:11:43.480 --> 0:11:47.440
<v Speaker 2>but today, just in case you don't remember, the summer

0:11:47.480 --> 0:11:52.720
<v Speaker 2>of twenty seventeen. That'll do, because the facts at issue

0:11:52.760 --> 0:11:55.880
<v Speaker 2>in that lawsuit are here at the entrance to the

0:11:55.920 --> 0:12:01.360
<v Speaker 2>park between about nine thirty am in noon. The plaintiffs

0:12:01.360 --> 0:12:05.400
<v Speaker 2>in this lawsuit, Gregory Kanti and Warren Baylaw, are Nazis.

0:12:07.160 --> 0:12:10.520
<v Speaker 2>People throw that word around a lot, so I'll let

0:12:10.520 --> 0:12:13.720
<v Speaker 2>you hear it from them. Here's Warren on his own

0:12:13.760 --> 0:12:17.520
<v Speaker 2>podcast explaining to his wife that they have a responsibility

0:12:17.600 --> 0:12:18.880
<v Speaker 2>to spread Hitler's message.

0:12:21.360 --> 0:12:24.640
<v Speaker 3>The fact is, the fact is, and we all know it.

0:12:24.679 --> 0:12:26.959
<v Speaker 3>I think everybody who watches the show knows it. Hitler

0:12:27.200 --> 0:12:30.439
<v Speaker 3>was a true patriot. He was a complete idealist, a

0:12:30.800 --> 0:12:33.360
<v Speaker 3>entirely selfless man. He was also a genius, and he

0:12:33.559 --> 0:12:37.000
<v Speaker 3>was probably the greatest political leader that Europe has ever seen.

0:12:40.240 --> 0:12:43.640
<v Speaker 2>And here's Greg in one of his many bizarre, straight

0:12:43.679 --> 0:12:48.160
<v Speaker 2>to camera short video rants from his social media.

0:12:49.400 --> 0:12:54.520
<v Speaker 4>The FBI is full of pedophiles, and our countries have.

0:12:54.559 --> 0:13:00.840
<v Speaker 1>Been ruled by twos phraars. And you think that that

0:13:01.040 --> 0:13:03.959
<v Speaker 1>flag is the problem.

0:13:04.760 --> 0:13:07.720
<v Speaker 2>You're not practical, You're just pussy.

0:13:08.880 --> 0:13:14.920
<v Speaker 1>Hitler is our only hope.

0:13:17.480 --> 0:13:19.679
<v Speaker 2>It was hard to find one of Greg's videos that

0:13:19.720 --> 0:13:23.079
<v Speaker 2>clearly expressed his point of view, but that didn't also

0:13:23.120 --> 0:13:26.840
<v Speaker 2>contain so many slurs that it would become incomprehensible once

0:13:26.880 --> 0:13:31.880
<v Speaker 2>I bleeped them out. But they're Nazis. These guys love Hitler.

0:13:33.000 --> 0:13:37.880
<v Speaker 2>They're like really obsessed with Hitler. Honestly, the Hitler worship

0:13:37.960 --> 0:13:41.200
<v Speaker 2>here is actually kind of weird, even in their own

0:13:41.280 --> 0:13:47.400
<v Speaker 2>social circles. Warren Baylaw is actually a second generation National Socialist.

0:13:47.720 --> 0:13:49.920
<v Speaker 2>His father, Alan Baylaw, was a high ranking member with

0:13:49.960 --> 0:13:54.040
<v Speaker 2>a National Alliance before Warren was even born. As for

0:13:54.160 --> 0:13:57.600
<v Speaker 2>Greg Conti, he was coaching field hockey at a Catholic girls'

0:13:57.600 --> 0:13:59.800
<v Speaker 2>school in Maryland before he was fired when the school

0:14:00.360 --> 0:14:05.000
<v Speaker 2>he was Richard Spencer's lackey. In twenty twenty, both Allan

0:14:05.080 --> 0:14:08.400
<v Speaker 2>and Warren Baylaw and Greg Conti were founding members of

0:14:08.400 --> 0:14:12.880
<v Speaker 2>a now defunct neo Nazi organization called the National Justice Party.

0:14:13.520 --> 0:14:18.360
<v Speaker 2>And in twenty seventeen, Warren Baylaw and Gregory Kanti were

0:14:18.400 --> 0:14:21.280
<v Speaker 2>inside the park when the Virginia State Police showed up

0:14:21.280 --> 0:14:26.480
<v Speaker 2>a riot year to enforce that dispersal order. Daniel Schular,

0:14:26.560 --> 0:14:29.320
<v Speaker 2>a photojournalist taking pictures that day for the Tulsa World,

0:14:29.800 --> 0:14:33.040
<v Speaker 2>captured an image that shows both men right up against

0:14:33.080 --> 0:14:33.760
<v Speaker 2>the riot.

0:14:33.520 --> 0:14:37.040
<v Speaker 1>Shields on August.

0:14:36.720 --> 0:14:39.800
<v Speaker 2>Twelfth, twenty nineteen, the very last day of the two

0:14:39.880 --> 0:14:42.840
<v Speaker 2>year statute of limitations to bring the claim under Virginia law,

0:14:43.840 --> 0:14:47.000
<v Speaker 2>the pair filed a federal civil rights lawsuit claiming that

0:14:47.000 --> 0:14:51.920
<v Speaker 2>the police, the city, and the counter protesters had conspired

0:14:52.640 --> 0:14:55.360
<v Speaker 2>to deprive them of their right to hold that Nazi rally,

0:14:56.200 --> 0:14:59.120
<v Speaker 2>that by clearing the park, and that by refusing to

0:14:59.160 --> 0:15:03.080
<v Speaker 2>beat back the CA counter protesters on their behalf, the

0:15:03.120 --> 0:15:06.160
<v Speaker 2>police had violated their First Amendment rights and denied them

0:15:06.200 --> 0:15:10.600
<v Speaker 2>their Fourteenth Amendment right to equal protection. There are some

0:15:10.640 --> 0:15:15.320
<v Speaker 2>other more bizarre claims involving wild allegations of a criminal

0:15:15.360 --> 0:15:20.840
<v Speaker 2>conspiracy between Antifa and the government actors, but those rico

0:15:20.920 --> 0:15:24.200
<v Speaker 2>allegations aren't really worth getting into. It's very silly stuff.

0:15:25.960 --> 0:15:31.520
<v Speaker 2>The underlying idea, quoting from the suit, defendants intentionally encouraged

0:15:31.520 --> 0:15:35.320
<v Speaker 2>and facilitated mob violence by counter protesters against lawful Unite

0:15:35.360 --> 0:15:39.360
<v Speaker 2>the Right demonstrators, creating a civil disturbance as a pretext

0:15:39.560 --> 0:15:42.720
<v Speaker 2>to disperse the demonstrators before the Unite the Right rally began.

0:15:45.160 --> 0:15:48.800
<v Speaker 2>So they're saying that police didn't just let counter protesters

0:15:48.840 --> 0:15:52.560
<v Speaker 2>interfere with the rally. They're saying they think police set

0:15:52.720 --> 0:15:56.040
<v Speaker 2>that up so they'd have an excuse to then crack

0:15:56.080 --> 0:15:56.960
<v Speaker 2>down on the Nazis.

0:15:58.360 --> 0:15:58.800
<v Speaker 1>Quote.

0:15:59.160 --> 0:16:02.160
<v Speaker 2>Rather than applying simple and proven techniques such as allowing

0:16:02.240 --> 0:16:05.520
<v Speaker 2>Unite the Right demonstrators and counter protesters to use separate areas,

0:16:06.000 --> 0:16:09.880
<v Speaker 2>the defendants forced them together into a restricted space, then

0:16:10.000 --> 0:16:13.240
<v Speaker 2>deliberately communicated to counter protesters that attacks on Unite the

0:16:13.280 --> 0:16:18.200
<v Speaker 2>Right demonstrators would go unpunished. Predictably, and as defendants intended,

0:16:18.640 --> 0:16:22.600
<v Speaker 2>counter protesters attacked and assaulted United the Right demonstrators, and

0:16:22.640 --> 0:16:26.320
<v Speaker 2>the defendants used those violent attacks against lawful demonstrators as

0:16:26.360 --> 0:16:32.520
<v Speaker 2>a pretext to disperse the entire gathering. I mean, citation

0:16:32.720 --> 0:16:38.120
<v Speaker 2>needed for most of that. But here's the thing. No

0:16:38.200 --> 0:16:42.800
<v Speaker 2>one disputes that the police fucked up. The city admits it.

0:16:43.720 --> 0:16:48.760
<v Speaker 2>The police kind of admitted it. The independent review flawed

0:16:48.800 --> 0:16:52.400
<v Speaker 2>as it was found that to be the case. Protesters

0:16:52.440 --> 0:16:58.080
<v Speaker 2>and counter protesters alike were dumbfounded by the complete and

0:16:58.320 --> 0:17:02.920
<v Speaker 2>total inaction of the police who just stood there and

0:17:02.960 --> 0:17:07.920
<v Speaker 2>watched as the violence unfolded. People with blood running down

0:17:07.960 --> 0:17:11.359
<v Speaker 2>their faces were screaming at the police to do something, anything,

0:17:12.680 --> 0:17:19.760
<v Speaker 2>and they really did just stand there. That's not in dispute.

0:17:19.880 --> 0:17:23.199
<v Speaker 2>The legal question here is not did they do that?

0:17:24.600 --> 0:17:29.680
<v Speaker 2>But can they do that? And the answer is unequivocally yes,

0:17:30.600 --> 0:17:33.560
<v Speaker 2>yes they can. There isn't a law on the books

0:17:33.680 --> 0:17:35.640
<v Speaker 2>or a decision in the case law that says they

0:17:35.720 --> 0:17:40.239
<v Speaker 2>have to do a goddamn thing to help you. There

0:17:40.320 --> 0:17:44.640
<v Speaker 2>are a disturbing number of cases bearing this out. There

0:17:44.640 --> 0:17:49.280
<v Speaker 2>are cases in state courts like Loziito versus New York City.

0:17:49.359 --> 0:17:51.879
<v Speaker 2>In February of twenty eleven, the NYPD was on a

0:17:51.880 --> 0:17:55.520
<v Speaker 2>manhunt for a man on a stabbing spree. He'd already

0:17:55.560 --> 0:17:57.720
<v Speaker 2>stabbed several people to death when he bore the train

0:17:57.760 --> 0:18:02.320
<v Speaker 2>that morning, Acting on a tip that the serial stabber

0:18:02.359 --> 0:18:05.840
<v Speaker 2>had been spotted on the subway platform, boarded the same train.

0:18:07.480 --> 0:18:12.080
<v Speaker 2>They saw the man they were looking for and recognized him,

0:18:12.480 --> 0:18:14.879
<v Speaker 2>but they would later say they thought he had a gun.

0:18:15.720 --> 0:18:18.280
<v Speaker 2>Now again, he'd been on a stabbing spree for twenty

0:18:18.280 --> 0:18:19.960
<v Speaker 2>four hours. Do you think if he had a gun,

0:18:20.000 --> 0:18:23.560
<v Speaker 2>he might have I don't know, shot anyone prior to

0:18:23.600 --> 0:18:25.879
<v Speaker 2>this moment rather than stabbing them all to death. But

0:18:25.960 --> 0:18:29.119
<v Speaker 2>they say they thought he had a gun. So they

0:18:29.200 --> 0:18:32.920
<v Speaker 2>locked themselves in the conductor's car and just watched through

0:18:32.920 --> 0:18:36.720
<v Speaker 2>the window as their suspect brutally stabbed a man on

0:18:36.720 --> 0:18:39.720
<v Speaker 2>the train repeatedly in the head, just a few feet

0:18:39.720 --> 0:18:44.160
<v Speaker 2>away from where they were standing, but the victim fought back.

0:18:45.119 --> 0:18:48.080
<v Speaker 2>Joseph Lozito managed to pin his assailant to the ground

0:18:48.240 --> 0:18:52.040
<v Speaker 2>before losing consciousness from blood loss, and it was only

0:18:52.080 --> 0:18:56.359
<v Speaker 2>after Lozito had disarmed and subdued his own attacker that

0:18:56.440 --> 0:18:59.200
<v Speaker 2>the police felt safe enough to come out and make

0:18:59.240 --> 0:19:05.840
<v Speaker 2>the arrest. But his lawsuit was dismissed. The judge acknowledged

0:19:05.880 --> 0:19:10.800
<v Speaker 2>that the attack was shocking and horrific, but quote, the

0:19:10.880 --> 0:19:15.080
<v Speaker 2>law is abundantly clear that no liability flows from negligence

0:19:15.080 --> 0:19:17.119
<v Speaker 2>and the performance of a police function unless there is

0:19:17.160 --> 0:19:23.080
<v Speaker 2>a special relationship. If you're not in their custody, you

0:19:23.160 --> 0:19:28.280
<v Speaker 2>aren't their problem. That example lives large in my mind

0:19:28.320 --> 0:19:32.000
<v Speaker 2>because it's just so immediate and clear cut, Like I

0:19:32.000 --> 0:19:34.520
<v Speaker 2>can imagine them with their little faces pressed up against

0:19:34.520 --> 0:19:38.960
<v Speaker 2>the train window, just watching this happen because they're afraid.

0:19:40.359 --> 0:19:42.320
<v Speaker 2>But that's a New York State court case, so it's

0:19:42.320 --> 0:19:46.160
<v Speaker 2>not really binding here. But here are some that are.

0:19:48.800 --> 0:19:52.040
<v Speaker 5>This is case number zero four two seventy eight Town

0:19:52.080 --> 0:19:56.080
<v Speaker 5>of Castle Rock versus Gonzales I thought the Castle Rock

0:19:56.240 --> 0:20:00.600
<v Speaker 5>was a nineteen twenties dance, but it's also a town

0:20:00.680 --> 0:20:05.320
<v Speaker 5>in Colorado. The cases here on rid of Cerchiarii to

0:20:05.320 --> 0:20:08.880
<v Speaker 5>the Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. The facts

0:20:08.960 --> 0:20:10.040
<v Speaker 5>are truly horrible.

0:20:13.600 --> 0:20:17.640
<v Speaker 2>That is antonin Scalia making a little joke before announcing

0:20:17.640 --> 0:20:21.160
<v Speaker 2>a decision. That should make you question what the courts

0:20:21.200 --> 0:20:25.400
<v Speaker 2>think the police are even for. In two thousand and five,

0:20:25.480 --> 0:20:28.320
<v Speaker 2>the Supreme Court ruled in Castle Rock ve. Gonzales that

0:20:28.400 --> 0:20:32.280
<v Speaker 2>the police in Castle Rock, Colorado, had no affirmative duty

0:20:32.880 --> 0:20:35.320
<v Speaker 2>to enforce a restraining order, and that their refusal to

0:20:35.359 --> 0:20:38.840
<v Speaker 2>do so had not violated Jessica Gonzalez's Fourteenth Amendment right

0:20:38.880 --> 0:20:43.720
<v Speaker 2>to equal protection. Jessica Gonzalez had a restraining order against

0:20:43.760 --> 0:20:47.879
<v Speaker 2>her estranged husband. He was not allowed near her or

0:20:47.920 --> 0:20:51.240
<v Speaker 2>her home, and he was only allowed limited contact with

0:20:51.320 --> 0:20:56.439
<v Speaker 2>their daughters. But one afternoon in nineteen ninety nine, he

0:20:56.560 --> 0:21:03.080
<v Speaker 2>kidnapped their three daughters. Jessica called the police. The officers

0:21:03.080 --> 0:21:05.800
<v Speaker 2>who responded to her call told her there was nothing

0:21:05.800 --> 0:21:09.440
<v Speaker 2>they could do about the restraining order, and they suggested

0:21:09.480 --> 0:21:12.280
<v Speaker 2>that her husband would probably bring the girls home later

0:21:12.280 --> 0:21:15.600
<v Speaker 2>in the evening. And she should just wait and if

0:21:15.640 --> 0:21:18.280
<v Speaker 2>the girls weren't back by ten pm, she could call

0:21:18.320 --> 0:21:22.080
<v Speaker 2>them again. Around eight thirty, she managed to get a

0:21:22.080 --> 0:21:24.720
<v Speaker 2>hold of her husband on the phone, and he told

0:21:24.720 --> 0:21:26.480
<v Speaker 2>her he had the girls at an amusement park in

0:21:26.520 --> 0:21:30.520
<v Speaker 2>a neighboring city. So she called the police again and

0:21:30.600 --> 0:21:32.960
<v Speaker 2>told them where he was and asked them to put

0:21:32.960 --> 0:21:35.480
<v Speaker 2>out an all points bulletin for the area with his

0:21:35.520 --> 0:21:39.800
<v Speaker 2>license plate number. They refused, and they told her again,

0:21:40.800 --> 0:21:45.040
<v Speaker 2>just wait till ten pm. They'll be home. She called

0:21:45.080 --> 0:21:47.200
<v Speaker 2>again at ten pm and they told her this time

0:21:47.280 --> 0:21:50.679
<v Speaker 2>to wait until midnight, So she went to her husband's

0:21:50.720 --> 0:21:54.679
<v Speaker 2>apartment on her own and found nothing. She called the

0:21:54.680 --> 0:21:57.760
<v Speaker 2>police again at midnight. Finally she went to the police

0:21:57.800 --> 0:22:00.000
<v Speaker 2>station herself to try to talk to somebody in person,

0:22:00.280 --> 0:22:04.679
<v Speaker 2>and nobody cared. They just weren't interested in trying to

0:22:04.720 --> 0:22:11.639
<v Speaker 2>find her children or their father. But he found them.

0:22:11.800 --> 0:22:15.639
<v Speaker 2>At three am, Jessica Gonzalez's a strange husband showed up

0:22:15.640 --> 0:22:19.280
<v Speaker 2>at the police station with a gun. He'd purchased that

0:22:19.359 --> 0:22:24.200
<v Speaker 2>gun earlier that same evening, sometime after he abducted his daughters,

0:22:24.240 --> 0:22:29.560
<v Speaker 2>and certainly before he used it to murder them. After

0:22:29.600 --> 0:22:32.359
<v Speaker 2>police shot him dead inside the police station. They found

0:22:32.359 --> 0:22:34.200
<v Speaker 2>the girl's bodies outside in his truck.

0:22:36.840 --> 0:22:39.800
<v Speaker 5>We conclude that Colorado law did not give responded an

0:22:39.960 --> 0:22:42.040
<v Speaker 5>entitlement to enforcement of the restraining order.

0:22:45.200 --> 0:22:47.159
<v Speaker 2>The Supreme Court ruled that there was nothing in the

0:22:47.240 --> 0:22:50.920
<v Speaker 2>law that required the police to enforce the restraining order,

0:22:52.240 --> 0:22:55.560
<v Speaker 2>and even if there were such a mandate, that wouldn't

0:22:55.560 --> 0:22:58.760
<v Speaker 2>give her the right to have it enforced. And even

0:22:58.760 --> 0:23:01.200
<v Speaker 2>if she did have the hypethetical right to have that

0:23:01.320 --> 0:23:06.200
<v Speaker 2>hypothetical mandate enforced, that right would have no monetary value.

0:23:06.680 --> 0:23:09.040
<v Speaker 2>So there's really no due process claim at issue here.

0:23:11.119 --> 0:23:14.639
<v Speaker 2>And then there's Toshaney the Winnebago decided by the Supreme

0:23:14.680 --> 0:23:18.760
<v Speaker 2>Court in nineteen eighty nine. This one doesn't actually involve

0:23:18.800 --> 0:23:22.600
<v Speaker 2>the police specifically, but it cited repeatedly in the lawsuits

0:23:22.600 --> 0:23:25.520
<v Speaker 2>we're talking about because it held that a government agency,

0:23:25.960 --> 0:23:28.520
<v Speaker 2>any government agency, although in this case it's the Department

0:23:28.560 --> 0:23:34.320
<v Speaker 2>of Social Services, has no affirmative duty to protect anyone

0:23:34.520 --> 0:23:38.000
<v Speaker 2>from any kind of harm that the government itself had

0:23:38.040 --> 0:23:42.520
<v Speaker 2>not created. Joshua D. Shaney was a four year old

0:23:42.520 --> 0:23:45.400
<v Speaker 2>boy whose father beat him so badly he was left

0:23:45.440 --> 0:23:49.760
<v Speaker 2>in a coma. And this was after Social services had

0:23:49.800 --> 0:23:55.120
<v Speaker 2>ignored reports of abuse for a year. When Joshua's stepmother

0:23:55.200 --> 0:23:57.680
<v Speaker 2>went to the police to report seeing the boy's father

0:23:57.800 --> 0:24:01.159
<v Speaker 2>hit him, they brushed her off and referred her to

0:24:01.200 --> 0:24:05.400
<v Speaker 2>social services, and so she made the report to Social services.

0:24:07.119 --> 0:24:10.760
<v Speaker 2>Neighbors seeing and hearing the toddler being beaten, and the

0:24:10.800 --> 0:24:14.960
<v Speaker 2>police sent them to social services. The boy was seen

0:24:15.000 --> 0:24:18.960
<v Speaker 2>in the emergency room three separate times, and doctors reported

0:24:19.040 --> 0:24:22.080
<v Speaker 2>seeing the signs of abuse to Social services all three times.

0:24:23.440 --> 0:24:26.119
<v Speaker 2>After the first hospital visit, the boy was briefly removed

0:24:26.119 --> 0:24:29.600
<v Speaker 2>from the home, but the state agency quickly returned him

0:24:29.600 --> 0:24:33.520
<v Speaker 2>to the custody of his abuser. A caseworker visited the

0:24:33.520 --> 0:24:37.600
<v Speaker 2>home at least twenty times, and her notes show that

0:24:37.640 --> 0:24:42.600
<v Speaker 2>she saw and documented signs of abuse, but no one

0:24:42.880 --> 0:24:48.400
<v Speaker 2>did anything. After Joshua was put into a coma by

0:24:48.400 --> 0:24:53.160
<v Speaker 2>his father's abuse, that social worker said, I just knew

0:24:53.200 --> 0:24:58.000
<v Speaker 2>the phone would ring some day and Joshua would be dead,

0:24:58.160 --> 0:25:14.480
<v Speaker 2>but she didn't do anything. The court ruled that only

0:25:14.560 --> 0:25:17.480
<v Speaker 2>Joshua's father could be held liable for the abuse, that

0:25:17.520 --> 0:25:20.399
<v Speaker 2>there was no liability for the state agency that repeatedly

0:25:20.440 --> 0:25:23.760
<v Speaker 2>returned the child to the custody of his abuser. Further,

0:25:23.880 --> 0:25:27.320
<v Speaker 2>the opinion says the state's failure to protect an individual

0:25:27.359 --> 0:25:31.639
<v Speaker 2>against private violence simply does not constitute a violation of

0:25:31.640 --> 0:25:35.720
<v Speaker 2>the due process claus The The Shainey case is cited

0:25:35.800 --> 0:25:39.280
<v Speaker 2>again and again in cases attempting to hold the police

0:25:39.520 --> 0:25:45.159
<v Speaker 2>or any government agency accountable or standing by and letting

0:25:45.200 --> 0:25:49.679
<v Speaker 2>people get hurt. Because the state is not required to

0:25:49.760 --> 0:25:52.959
<v Speaker 2>help you, they can't be held liable for anything that

0:25:53.000 --> 0:25:58.840
<v Speaker 2>happens to you simply because they actively chose not to intervene.

0:25:59.000 --> 0:26:01.240
<v Speaker 2>The only real exception to that rule are if you

0:26:01.280 --> 0:26:05.639
<v Speaker 2>are in state custody or if the dangerous situation was

0:26:05.760 --> 0:26:12.280
<v Speaker 2>created by that state actor. There are a nauseating number

0:26:12.280 --> 0:26:15.600
<v Speaker 2>of cases establishing the parameters here, but I'll just give

0:26:15.640 --> 0:26:19.480
<v Speaker 2>you one more. Kantie and Baila filed their suit in Virginia,

0:26:20.440 --> 0:26:22.840
<v Speaker 2>so when it was dismissed, they appealed it to the

0:26:22.840 --> 0:26:26.560
<v Speaker 2>Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals, And there is a Fourth

0:26:26.560 --> 0:26:30.360
<v Speaker 2>Circuit Court of Appeals case that flushes out their interpretation

0:26:30.480 --> 0:26:34.200
<v Speaker 2>of Toshaney. A nineteen ninety five opinion in the case

0:26:34.240 --> 0:26:41.040
<v Speaker 2>of Carol Pinder the officer Donald Johnson. In nineteen eighty nine,

0:26:41.200 --> 0:26:45.200
<v Speaker 2>Carol Pinder called the police. Her abusive ex boyfriend, Don

0:26:45.200 --> 0:26:47.560
<v Speaker 2>Pittman had broken into her home and he was punching

0:26:47.600 --> 0:26:50.480
<v Speaker 2>her and breaking things and threatening to kill her and

0:26:50.560 --> 0:26:54.760
<v Speaker 2>her children. The officer who responded to her call took

0:26:54.760 --> 0:26:58.400
<v Speaker 2>Pittman into custody and assured Carol Pinder that he would

0:26:58.400 --> 0:27:01.440
<v Speaker 2>be locked up overnight until he could be brought before

0:27:01.440 --> 0:27:06.240
<v Speaker 2>a judge in the morning. She specifically asked she was

0:27:06.280 --> 0:27:09.000
<v Speaker 2>concerned about going to work that evening because Pittman had

0:27:09.040 --> 0:27:13.600
<v Speaker 2>threatened her before. He'd actually only just been released from jail.

0:27:14.440 --> 0:27:17.240
<v Speaker 2>He'd been convicted of attempt at arson for trying to

0:27:17.240 --> 0:27:21.240
<v Speaker 2>set her house on fire just ten months earlier. The

0:27:21.320 --> 0:27:25.720
<v Speaker 2>officer specifically told Carol Pinder that Pittman would be in

0:27:25.840 --> 0:27:29.320
<v Speaker 2>jail all night and that she wouldn't be able to

0:27:29.359 --> 0:27:34.000
<v Speaker 2>file her complaint until tomorrow morning anyway, so she went

0:27:34.040 --> 0:27:37.439
<v Speaker 2>to work. She went to work that evening because the

0:27:37.480 --> 0:27:40.520
<v Speaker 2>officer promised her that this man would be in jail

0:27:41.160 --> 0:27:45.880
<v Speaker 2>until tomorrow morning, when she could speak to the judge.

0:27:46.119 --> 0:27:49.600
<v Speaker 2>But Pittman was released within hours, and while she was

0:27:49.600 --> 0:27:53.240
<v Speaker 2>at work that evening, Pittman set Carol Pinder's house on fire,

0:27:53.640 --> 0:27:55.840
<v Speaker 2>just like he promised. He would do just like he'd

0:27:55.880 --> 0:28:01.280
<v Speaker 2>done once before, and her three children were inside. All

0:28:01.320 --> 0:28:05.679
<v Speaker 2>three of those children died in the fire, and that

0:28:05.800 --> 0:28:09.639
<v Speaker 2>fire was set just eighteen days after the Supreme Court

0:28:09.680 --> 0:28:13.560
<v Speaker 2>decided the Toshaney case, and the Fourth Circuit cites to

0:28:13.600 --> 0:28:17.560
<v Speaker 2>Shaney throughout their opinion. In Pinder, there are only two

0:28:17.640 --> 0:28:20.840
<v Speaker 2>situations where the police officer would have any affirmative duty

0:28:21.400 --> 0:28:25.800
<v Speaker 2>to protect anyone. One is if there is a custodial relationship.

0:28:26.640 --> 0:28:29.399
<v Speaker 2>If you are in their custody, they're a little bit

0:28:29.440 --> 0:28:33.000
<v Speaker 2>responsible for your safety. So if Carol Pinder had been,

0:28:33.160 --> 0:28:36.359
<v Speaker 2>for instance, in the county jail, the police would be

0:28:36.400 --> 0:28:40.880
<v Speaker 2>responsible if her ex murdered her. But making a promise

0:28:40.920 --> 0:28:48.320
<v Speaker 2>to Carol Pinder meant nothing. Promises aren't legally binding. Again

0:28:48.360 --> 0:28:52.520
<v Speaker 2>from the opinion quote, state actors may not disclaim liability

0:28:52.560 --> 0:28:56.360
<v Speaker 2>when they themselves throw others to the lions. They do not,

0:28:56.480 --> 0:29:00.520
<v Speaker 2>by contrast, in title persons who rely on pises of

0:29:00.560 --> 0:29:06.160
<v Speaker 2>aid to some greater degree of protection from lions at large.

0:29:06.560 --> 0:29:09.560
<v Speaker 2>And that's the second exception from the Dushaney case. Right,

0:29:10.200 --> 0:29:13.719
<v Speaker 2>they can't throw you to the lions, meaning they can't

0:29:13.920 --> 0:29:17.880
<v Speaker 2>create circumstances that directly cause harm to come to you

0:29:18.280 --> 0:29:21.760
<v Speaker 2>at the hands of someone else, and that's what's called

0:29:21.760 --> 0:29:27.160
<v Speaker 2>the state created danger doctrine. On that front, the Fourth

0:29:27.160 --> 0:29:30.440
<v Speaker 2>Circuit is pretty clear. They wrote in twenty nineteen that

0:29:30.440 --> 0:29:34.520
<v Speaker 2>they've never written in an opinion recognizing the validity of

0:29:34.520 --> 0:29:37.640
<v Speaker 2>such a claim. It's a very high bar to clear

0:29:37.720 --> 0:29:40.920
<v Speaker 2>in the opinion of the Fourth Circuit, so high in fact,

0:29:40.960 --> 0:29:43.760
<v Speaker 2>that despite their claim that they believe it is a

0:29:43.840 --> 0:29:48.440
<v Speaker 2>valid hypothetical legal idea, it's never actually happened in the

0:29:48.480 --> 0:29:53.640
<v Speaker 2>Fourth Circuit. There are examples in other jurisdictions, but honestly,

0:29:53.680 --> 0:29:57.680
<v Speaker 2>reading these examples, I don't understand why the police in

0:29:57.720 --> 0:30:00.240
<v Speaker 2>these cases are more liable than in some cases. Is

0:30:00.240 --> 0:30:04.160
<v Speaker 2>where the court found that they weren't. There are several

0:30:04.160 --> 0:30:07.640
<v Speaker 2>cases involving people who were very intoxicated. So in one case,

0:30:07.880 --> 0:30:10.480
<v Speaker 2>someone was pulled over while driving drunk, and the officer

0:30:10.600 --> 0:30:14.000
<v Speaker 2>took the driver, who was intoxicated, into custody and they

0:30:14.000 --> 0:30:17.840
<v Speaker 2>took his keys, but the female passenger in the car,

0:30:17.880 --> 0:30:20.720
<v Speaker 2>who was not drunk, was not allowed to have the

0:30:20.840 --> 0:30:23.440
<v Speaker 2>keys to drive herself home. They just left her on

0:30:23.480 --> 0:30:26.200
<v Speaker 2>the side of the road and she was subsequently raped

0:30:26.720 --> 0:30:29.600
<v Speaker 2>and she was able to successfully sue those police officers,

0:30:29.680 --> 0:30:33.040
<v Speaker 2>saying they were responsible for this state created danger. She

0:30:33.040 --> 0:30:34.960
<v Speaker 2>would not have been there alone on the side of

0:30:35.000 --> 0:30:38.000
<v Speaker 2>the road with no transportation if the police had not

0:30:38.520 --> 0:30:41.160
<v Speaker 2>arrested the driver of the vehicle for being intoxicated and

0:30:41.320 --> 0:30:44.040
<v Speaker 2>left her without a way to get home. There was

0:30:44.080 --> 0:30:46.360
<v Speaker 2>another case where police responded to a dispute at a

0:30:46.400 --> 0:30:49.560
<v Speaker 2>bar and they threw one man out, took away his

0:30:49.640 --> 0:30:52.440
<v Speaker 2>key so that he couldn't drive home, and they wouldn't

0:30:52.480 --> 0:30:54.200
<v Speaker 2>let him back in, so he couldn't drive home, and

0:30:54.240 --> 0:30:56.760
<v Speaker 2>he couldn't come inside, and they didn't offer to take

0:30:56.800 --> 0:30:59.400
<v Speaker 2>him home. So he's just out there in the cold

0:30:59.480 --> 0:31:01.600
<v Speaker 2>at night in jeans and a T shirt, and he

0:31:01.640 --> 0:31:05.600
<v Speaker 2>did eventually die of hypothermia. And in that case, too,

0:31:05.640 --> 0:31:08.760
<v Speaker 2>the police were found to be responsible for having created

0:31:08.800 --> 0:31:12.479
<v Speaker 2>the dangerous circumstances in which harm came to him. So

0:31:13.280 --> 0:31:16.080
<v Speaker 2>it does happen. I'm not saying it's never happened. I'm

0:31:16.080 --> 0:31:18.520
<v Speaker 2>just saying the Fourth Circuit says they've never seen it.

0:31:20.080 --> 0:31:22.880
<v Speaker 2>All the cases the Fourth Circuit recognizes where a state

0:31:22.920 --> 0:31:25.600
<v Speaker 2>actor can be said to have had an affirmative duty

0:31:25.640 --> 0:31:28.680
<v Speaker 2>to anyone were cases where the injured party was in

0:31:28.720 --> 0:31:33.240
<v Speaker 2>police custody. A Fourth Circuit ruling in dove Rosa in

0:31:33.280 --> 0:31:37.520
<v Speaker 2>twenty fifteen further clarified their view of what constitutes state

0:31:37.600 --> 0:31:43.440
<v Speaker 2>created danger. Quote, the state, through its affirmative acts, must

0:31:43.560 --> 0:31:48.400
<v Speaker 2>itself create the dangerous situation that resulted in the victim's injury.

0:31:49.640 --> 0:31:53.080
<v Speaker 2>No constitutional liability exists where the state actors had no

0:31:53.240 --> 0:31:56.760
<v Speaker 2>hand in creating the danger, but simply stood by and

0:31:56.800 --> 0:32:01.960
<v Speaker 2>did nothing when suspicious circumstances dictated a more active role

0:32:02.040 --> 0:32:08.280
<v Speaker 2>for them. So deliberate indifference, just standing there and watching

0:32:08.320 --> 0:32:12.160
<v Speaker 2>harm come to someone and choosing to do nothing, that

0:32:12.200 --> 0:32:16.960
<v Speaker 2>doesn't rise to the level of actively creating the harmful circumstance.

0:32:17.600 --> 0:32:23.960
<v Speaker 2>Because doing nothing isn't doing something. Doing nothing is not

0:32:24.160 --> 0:32:27.760
<v Speaker 2>an action, So the act of doing nothing does not

0:32:27.960 --> 0:32:33.520
<v Speaker 2>constitute the affirmative step of taking an action. That sounds

0:32:33.600 --> 0:32:36.880
<v Speaker 2>like meaningless circular reasoning, but I promise you that comes

0:32:36.920 --> 0:32:41.680
<v Speaker 2>back again. The act of doing nothing is not legally

0:32:42.200 --> 0:32:46.960
<v Speaker 2>an action at all, And that probably feels like a

0:32:46.960 --> 0:32:50.360
<v Speaker 2>lot of extraneous detail. But all of this has been

0:32:50.400 --> 0:32:53.320
<v Speaker 2>to say that anyone filing a lawsuit anywhere in the

0:32:53.440 --> 0:32:56.920
<v Speaker 2>United States is going to face a steep uphill battle

0:32:57.480 --> 0:33:00.000
<v Speaker 2>if they're trying to prove that the government had any response.

0:33:00.000 --> 0:33:02.920
<v Speaker 2>It's ability to prevent harm caused by a non state actor.

0:33:04.440 --> 0:33:08.160
<v Speaker 2>The state can't violate your right to free speech, but

0:33:08.280 --> 0:33:12.560
<v Speaker 2>they don't have to help you speak. The state can't

0:33:12.560 --> 0:33:14.640
<v Speaker 2>burn your house down, but they don't have to stop

0:33:14.680 --> 0:33:18.120
<v Speaker 2>your ex from doing it. The state can't deny you

0:33:18.240 --> 0:33:22.480
<v Speaker 2>the right to hold your demonstration, but they can just

0:33:22.520 --> 0:33:26.280
<v Speaker 2>stand there and watch as the situation becomes too unsafe

0:33:26.760 --> 0:33:30.880
<v Speaker 2>to allow it to continue. And that legal battle would

0:33:30.880 --> 0:33:33.479
<v Speaker 2>be even steeper here in the Fourth Circuit, where the

0:33:33.560 --> 0:33:37.440
<v Speaker 2>Rosa and Pinder cases were decided. The Fourth Circuit does

0:33:37.480 --> 0:33:40.120
<v Speaker 2>not believe that it is possible for the state actor

0:33:40.160 --> 0:33:43.920
<v Speaker 2>to be responsible for any dangerous situation unless the injured

0:33:43.960 --> 0:33:47.800
<v Speaker 2>party was already in their custody. And by the time

0:33:47.840 --> 0:33:50.600
<v Speaker 2>greg Contein warren Bylaw filed this suit in twenty nineteen,

0:33:51.360 --> 0:33:53.680
<v Speaker 2>they had every reason to know it was a waste

0:33:53.720 --> 0:33:56.960
<v Speaker 2>of time. They may not have been familiar with the

0:33:56.960 --> 0:33:59.160
<v Speaker 2>case law, and they didn't have the money to hire

0:33:59.160 --> 0:34:02.280
<v Speaker 2>an attorney, but they did ask a friend who is

0:34:02.280 --> 0:34:06.360
<v Speaker 2>a lawyer to ghost write their complaint, and they surely

0:34:06.840 --> 0:34:11.080
<v Speaker 2>knew that other lawsuits making the exact same claims about

0:34:11.120 --> 0:34:14.680
<v Speaker 2>the exact same events had already been dismissed by the

0:34:14.800 --> 0:34:19.600
<v Speaker 2>same court. Kanti and bylaw filed their suit pro say,

0:34:20.360 --> 0:34:24.799
<v Speaker 2>meaning without a lawyer, and prose litigans are given a

0:34:24.840 --> 0:34:27.680
<v Speaker 2>lot of leeway by the court because they don't have

0:34:27.680 --> 0:34:32.719
<v Speaker 2>a lawyer's help. Their filings are interpreted much more charitably,

0:34:34.080 --> 0:34:37.120
<v Speaker 2>but they aren't allowed to secretly have a lawyer who

0:34:37.160 --> 0:34:40.040
<v Speaker 2>helps them in order to have it both ways, to

0:34:40.320 --> 0:34:43.840
<v Speaker 2>both have legal counsel and be afforded the leniency granted

0:34:43.840 --> 0:34:49.080
<v Speaker 2>to those who don't. Technically, though, you can get a

0:34:49.120 --> 0:34:51.560
<v Speaker 2>lawyer to ghost write your lawsuit and then just sort

0:34:51.600 --> 0:34:57.040
<v Speaker 2>of proceed from there. It's not preferred. Some jurisdictions require

0:34:57.080 --> 0:35:00.840
<v Speaker 2>you to disclose it, and most would prefer it, but

0:35:00.920 --> 0:35:06.160
<v Speaker 2>the ethics committees in many jurisdictions have said, yeah, yeah,

0:35:06.200 --> 0:35:11.000
<v Speaker 2>you can do this. And because Kanti and Beylaw accidentally

0:35:11.040 --> 0:35:15.560
<v Speaker 2>filed their lawsuit in the wrong jurisdiction, they originally filed

0:35:15.560 --> 0:35:19.319
<v Speaker 2>their suit in a district whose local rules do require

0:35:19.800 --> 0:35:22.359
<v Speaker 2>you to submit a signed form disclosing that you had

0:35:22.360 --> 0:35:26.200
<v Speaker 2>a ghostwriter. So I know that they asked their friend

0:35:26.239 --> 0:35:30.560
<v Speaker 2>Augustus Sole Invictus to draft this complaint, which again they

0:35:30.600 --> 0:35:35.560
<v Speaker 2>then filed in the wrong jurisdiction. In addition to being

0:35:35.600 --> 0:35:39.440
<v Speaker 2>an attorney, Augustus Invictus was a scheduled speaker at the

0:35:39.520 --> 0:35:42.920
<v Speaker 2>United the Right rally, and he's had some legal troubles

0:35:42.960 --> 0:35:46.040
<v Speaker 2>of his own in the years since. Who's recently convicted

0:35:46.080 --> 0:35:48.880
<v Speaker 2>of a felony for intimidating a group of college students

0:35:48.920 --> 0:35:51.560
<v Speaker 2>as part of a mob of torch wielding white supremacists,

0:35:52.760 --> 0:35:56.160
<v Speaker 2>But more relevant to the story at hand, After drafting

0:35:56.160 --> 0:35:59.719
<v Speaker 2>that complaint for Beilan Kanti back in twenty nineteen, he

0:35:59.840 --> 0:36:03.279
<v Speaker 2>was wasn't really very available to keep helping them out.

0:36:04.160 --> 0:36:07.799
<v Speaker 2>He was arrested in December of twenty nineteen for allegedly

0:36:08.480 --> 0:36:10.840
<v Speaker 2>abducting his wife at gunpoint because she was trying to

0:36:10.920 --> 0:36:16.279
<v Speaker 2>leave him. According to her own sworn statements in later proceedings,

0:36:16.719 --> 0:36:20.160
<v Speaker 2>she was coerced into not testifying at trial, so he

0:36:20.280 --> 0:36:23.960
<v Speaker 2>was never convicted on those charges. But at the time,

0:36:24.600 --> 0:36:28.040
<v Speaker 2>back in early twenty twenty, he was pretty preoccupied with

0:36:28.080 --> 0:36:31.520
<v Speaker 2>his own problems, so Kanti and Baila were kind of

0:36:31.560 --> 0:36:35.880
<v Speaker 2>on their own and it was truly a hopeless case.

0:36:36.760 --> 0:36:38.920
<v Speaker 2>By early twenty twenty, when it came time for the

0:36:38.920 --> 0:36:41.040
<v Speaker 2>pair to try to write some motions in their case,

0:36:42.040 --> 0:36:44.879
<v Speaker 2>the same court that would be reading those motions had

0:36:44.880 --> 0:36:51.280
<v Speaker 2>already dismissed four separate lawsuits making the same argument. Well,

0:36:51.840 --> 0:36:57.640
<v Speaker 2>four lawsuits, I guess were two in some change, because

0:36:57.680 --> 0:37:01.080
<v Speaker 2>one of those plaintiffs kept rears changing his claim, and

0:37:01.160 --> 0:37:06.880
<v Speaker 2>he filed three separate, slightly different cases. But the first

0:37:06.920 --> 0:37:10.120
<v Speaker 2>lawsuit brought before the federal court in the Western District

0:37:10.200 --> 0:37:13.360
<v Speaker 2>of Virginia that claimed that the police violated people's rights

0:37:13.400 --> 0:37:17.080
<v Speaker 2>by allowing the violence is the only one of those

0:37:17.120 --> 0:37:22.120
<v Speaker 2>cases that was filed by a counter protester. Robert Turner

0:37:22.200 --> 0:37:25.080
<v Speaker 2>was protesting the Nazi rally when he was pepper sprayed

0:37:25.080 --> 0:37:28.600
<v Speaker 2>and physically assaulted while police just stood there and watched.

0:37:30.400 --> 0:37:33.960
<v Speaker 2>Turner's lawyer seems to have been at least marginally more

0:37:34.000 --> 0:37:39.360
<v Speaker 2>competent than either Jason Kessler or Warren Baylaw's lawyers, so

0:37:39.440 --> 0:37:42.200
<v Speaker 2>he did come prepared to make an argument for state

0:37:42.280 --> 0:37:45.800
<v Speaker 2>created danger, alleging there had been a stand down order

0:37:45.840 --> 0:37:49.759
<v Speaker 2>given to all police on sen ahead of time. It

0:37:49.800 --> 0:37:53.240
<v Speaker 2>is alleged in the suit, and to some degree widely

0:37:53.280 --> 0:37:57.239
<v Speaker 2>believed in the community, that the officers had been instructed

0:37:57.280 --> 0:38:02.080
<v Speaker 2>ahead of time to do nothing, to just let the

0:38:02.160 --> 0:38:10.080
<v Speaker 2>violence happen. And that's a controversial theory. Does it feel true?

0:38:10.400 --> 0:38:11.120
<v Speaker 1>Kind of? Yeah.

0:38:12.000 --> 0:38:16.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, There's a lot of circumstantial and anecdotal evidence that

0:38:17.239 --> 0:38:22.640
<v Speaker 2>makes it feel very possible. No evidence was ever produced

0:38:22.680 --> 0:38:27.600
<v Speaker 2>that proved or disproved that any actual standdown order was

0:38:27.640 --> 0:38:31.080
<v Speaker 2>ever given by any police agency to its officers ahead of.

0:38:31.040 --> 0:38:31.680
<v Speaker 1>Time that day.

0:38:33.080 --> 0:38:36.200
<v Speaker 2>Both the city and state police have categorically denied it.

0:38:37.920 --> 0:38:41.040
<v Speaker 2>Two witnesses, though, a police captain and the police chief's

0:38:41.080 --> 0:38:46.759
<v Speaker 2>personal assistant, confirm that after the violence began they did

0:38:46.800 --> 0:38:52.160
<v Speaker 2>hear Police Chief Al Thomas say let them fight. It'll

0:38:52.160 --> 0:38:56.920
<v Speaker 2>make it easier to declare an unlawful assembly, which is

0:38:56.920 --> 0:39:00.680
<v Speaker 2>pretty damning. But it wasn't given as a demand that

0:39:00.760 --> 0:39:04.120
<v Speaker 2>was then disseminated to officers on scene, and by the

0:39:04.120 --> 0:39:06.560
<v Speaker 2>time he said it, it's already what was happening. Whether

0:39:06.560 --> 0:39:10.239
<v Speaker 2>that was the plan or not, there are scores of

0:39:10.280 --> 0:39:14.560
<v Speaker 2>eyewitness accounts, sworn statements, police after action interviews, and video

0:39:14.600 --> 0:39:19.640
<v Speaker 2>from police body cameras that prove that officers were unwilling

0:39:19.680 --> 0:39:25.080
<v Speaker 2>to act. We don't know why people approached lines of

0:39:25.160 --> 0:39:29.120
<v Speaker 2>cops begging them for help, and the officers just stood

0:39:29.160 --> 0:39:34.279
<v Speaker 2>there in silence. Other officers curtly answered that they would

0:39:34.320 --> 0:39:37.640
<v Speaker 2>intervene if and when commanded to do so, but they

0:39:37.680 --> 0:39:40.760
<v Speaker 2>wouldn't say what it would take for that command to happen.

0:39:42.760 --> 0:39:45.880
<v Speaker 2>Some officers reported being uncertain about what they were expected

0:39:45.920 --> 0:39:49.120
<v Speaker 2>to do or unwilling to risk their safety in a

0:39:49.200 --> 0:39:54.040
<v Speaker 2>volatile situation. Some of the police department employees whod been

0:39:54.080 --> 0:39:57.160
<v Speaker 2>deployed to hold intersections where the roads had been closed

0:39:57.840 --> 0:40:01.680
<v Speaker 2>weren't even sworn police officers, so they didn't carry weapons.

0:40:03.360 --> 0:40:05.960
<v Speaker 2>Whether this impacts how you feel about it or not,

0:40:06.560 --> 0:40:11.560
<v Speaker 2>the fact is a lot of them were scared. Whether

0:40:11.640 --> 0:40:14.360
<v Speaker 2>or not an actual standdown order had been issued that

0:40:14.480 --> 0:40:18.240
<v Speaker 2>morning was, according to Turner's lawsuit, an issue of fact

0:40:18.239 --> 0:40:22.040
<v Speaker 2>that could be determined a trial, But in alleging it,

0:40:22.680 --> 0:40:28.240
<v Speaker 2>they sought to establish something important. If true, Their argument

0:40:28.400 --> 0:40:33.440
<v Speaker 2>is that this constitute's state created danger. The dangerous situation

0:40:33.680 --> 0:40:36.719
<v Speaker 2>was the direct result of an order given by the

0:40:36.719 --> 0:40:39.560
<v Speaker 2>police chief, an order that was then carried out by

0:40:39.560 --> 0:40:43.440
<v Speaker 2>the police officers that sounds like it could pass the

0:40:43.480 --> 0:40:47.799
<v Speaker 2>test right. The police directly contributed to the danger by

0:40:47.880 --> 0:40:52.640
<v Speaker 2>following the order to stand down. But that's not how

0:40:52.640 --> 0:40:57.000
<v Speaker 2>the court felt. In the original opinion dismissing Turner's case,

0:40:57.200 --> 0:41:01.520
<v Speaker 2>Judge Norman Moon wrote, the incident in terms of a

0:41:01.560 --> 0:41:06.520
<v Speaker 2>standdown order is nothing more than an artful re characterization

0:41:07.000 --> 0:41:12.480
<v Speaker 2>of inaction as action, and the Fourth Circuit agreed with

0:41:12.520 --> 0:41:15.319
<v Speaker 2>him on appeal. The law has clearly established that in

0:41:15.440 --> 0:41:20.400
<v Speaker 2>action is not enough. Now they're clarifying that the act

0:41:20.520 --> 0:41:23.960
<v Speaker 2>of ordering in action ahead of time doesn't count as

0:41:24.040 --> 0:41:26.760
<v Speaker 2>taking in action at all. That's still just in action.

0:41:28.480 --> 0:41:42.320
<v Speaker 1>Baffling.

0:41:43.760 --> 0:41:47.440
<v Speaker 2>The next three lawsuits all came from one man, Jason Kessler,

0:41:47.840 --> 0:41:50.960
<v Speaker 2>the permit holder for the rally, and what bore you

0:41:51.000 --> 0:41:53.600
<v Speaker 2>to death at this point, because the three lawsuits are

0:41:53.640 --> 0:41:57.480
<v Speaker 2>all slightly different. In two of them, he convinced other

0:41:57.600 --> 0:42:00.440
<v Speaker 2>rally participants to add their names as coplain to one

0:42:00.440 --> 0:42:00.600
<v Speaker 2>of them.

0:42:00.640 --> 0:42:01.480
<v Speaker 1>It's just him.

0:42:01.800 --> 0:42:03.719
<v Speaker 2>The first time around, he only sued the city, but

0:42:03.760 --> 0:42:06.480
<v Speaker 2>in the second two lawsuits he's adding various city officials

0:42:06.480 --> 0:42:10.000
<v Speaker 2>and police agencies and the claims of all the little

0:42:10.000 --> 0:42:12.920
<v Speaker 2>bit as he goes too. But the strategy is pretty

0:42:12.960 --> 0:42:16.759
<v Speaker 2>much the same throughout. Instead of trying to argue that

0:42:16.800 --> 0:42:21.080
<v Speaker 2>what happened does meet the legal standard under Dashenyan Pinder

0:42:22.280 --> 0:42:24.960
<v Speaker 2>just don't mention it at all and hope no one

0:42:24.960 --> 0:42:29.120
<v Speaker 2>else does either, And so instead he relies on an

0:42:29.239 --> 0:42:33.160
<v Speaker 2>argument about the Heckler's veto, which is the situation that's

0:42:33.200 --> 0:42:37.760
<v Speaker 2>created where the state infringes on someone's free speech because

0:42:37.760 --> 0:42:42.080
<v Speaker 2>their speech is potentially very unpopular and they're worried that

0:42:42.160 --> 0:42:47.160
<v Speaker 2>there will be counter protesting that becomes disruptive. So in

0:42:47.280 --> 0:42:51.680
<v Speaker 2>order to prevent a disruption by people who oppose the speaker,

0:42:52.000 --> 0:42:56.239
<v Speaker 2>they simply prevent the speaker from speaking, And of course

0:42:56.280 --> 0:42:58.800
<v Speaker 2>they can't do that, right. The city couldn't have legally

0:42:58.840 --> 0:43:01.120
<v Speaker 2>denied him the permit just because they were worried the

0:43:01.120 --> 0:43:05.680
<v Speaker 2>counter protest might turn violent. They tried to do that,

0:43:05.719 --> 0:43:08.120
<v Speaker 2>and a federal court issued an injunction and gave him

0:43:08.120 --> 0:43:12.000
<v Speaker 2>the permit back. So that's not what happened. He had

0:43:12.040 --> 0:43:15.480
<v Speaker 2>the permit, and it also would have been a violation

0:43:15.640 --> 0:43:18.000
<v Speaker 2>of his rights and the rights of the other attendees

0:43:18.040 --> 0:43:21.200
<v Speaker 2>at his Nazi rally if the police had responded to

0:43:21.239 --> 0:43:24.520
<v Speaker 2>the disorder by merely removing them from the area, if

0:43:24.560 --> 0:43:27.040
<v Speaker 2>only they were made to leave and everyone else was

0:43:27.080 --> 0:43:31.239
<v Speaker 2>allowed to stay. Kessler suits alleged that the declaration of

0:43:31.280 --> 0:43:35.440
<v Speaker 2>the unlawful assembly was discriminatory because it was motivated by

0:43:35.440 --> 0:43:38.120
<v Speaker 2>the content of the speech at the rally. So he's

0:43:38.120 --> 0:43:41.680
<v Speaker 2>saying that only rally attendees were made to leave the park. Well,

0:43:42.480 --> 0:43:45.120
<v Speaker 2>only rally attendees were inside the park, and the park

0:43:45.239 --> 0:43:51.319
<v Speaker 2>was cleared. It was a very violent, but viewpoint neutral

0:43:51.640 --> 0:43:55.839
<v Speaker 2>barrage of pepper spray. So I won't say nobody's rights

0:43:55.880 --> 0:43:58.640
<v Speaker 2>got violated. I think some people's rights got a little violated.

0:43:59.640 --> 0:44:02.200
<v Speaker 2>But jas Sain Kessler failed to convince the court in

0:44:02.320 --> 0:44:06.440
<v Speaker 2>three separate lawsuits and one appeal that his First Amendment

0:44:06.520 --> 0:44:12.440
<v Speaker 2>rights were infringed upon in this particular way. The opinion

0:44:12.480 --> 0:44:14.960
<v Speaker 2>from the appeals court is brief, noting succinctly that the

0:44:15.040 --> 0:44:18.000
<v Speaker 2>rally goers were engaged in violence prior to the dispersal

0:44:18.080 --> 0:44:22.640
<v Speaker 2>order and quote. Kessler's complaint lacks any plausible allegation that

0:44:22.680 --> 0:44:27.000
<v Speaker 2>the unlawful assembly declaration and the dispersal order discriminated based

0:44:27.040 --> 0:44:29.600
<v Speaker 2>on content, So everybody had to leave.

0:44:29.800 --> 0:44:30.319
<v Speaker 1>It was fair.

0:44:32.040 --> 0:44:35.040
<v Speaker 2>And as much as Kessler's suit tries to dance around

0:44:35.320 --> 0:44:39.120
<v Speaker 2>having to argue against the precedent, said into Cheney, that's

0:44:39.160 --> 0:44:42.239
<v Speaker 2>where we end up. The lower court opinion says it

0:44:42.280 --> 0:44:45.520
<v Speaker 2>plainly the cases he tried to cite don't really apply.

0:44:46.600 --> 0:44:50.480
<v Speaker 2>He had his permit, the state hadn't proactively prevented him

0:44:50.480 --> 0:44:54.680
<v Speaker 2>from holding the event out of fear of public hostility quote,

0:44:55.000 --> 0:44:58.840
<v Speaker 2>but the law is clear that defendants had no constitutional

0:44:58.880 --> 0:45:05.399
<v Speaker 2>obligation to prevent that public hostility. I mean, for God's sake,

0:45:05.440 --> 0:45:07.080
<v Speaker 2>If the law says the police don't have to do

0:45:07.160 --> 0:45:10.320
<v Speaker 2>anything to stop three children from dying in a house fire,

0:45:10.760 --> 0:45:13.520
<v Speaker 2>even if they promised those children's mother that they wouldn't

0:45:13.560 --> 0:45:15.640
<v Speaker 2>let the man who'd previously set their house on fire

0:45:15.640 --> 0:45:17.279
<v Speaker 2>out of jail after he threatened to set their house

0:45:17.320 --> 0:45:21.880
<v Speaker 2>on fire again, then why would that same law entitle

0:45:22.040 --> 0:45:26.000
<v Speaker 2>you to proactive police protection to give Nazi salutes in

0:45:26.040 --> 0:45:31.000
<v Speaker 2>a public park. There is no constitutional right to police

0:45:31.040 --> 0:45:34.680
<v Speaker 2>protection from getting heckled. You can't sue the city because

0:45:34.719 --> 0:45:37.279
<v Speaker 2>everyone hated your Nazi rally. You very well could have

0:45:37.400 --> 0:45:40.319
<v Speaker 2>had your Nazi rally if the guys you invited to

0:45:40.400 --> 0:45:43.560
<v Speaker 2>the Nazi rally hadn't started brutalizing members of the clergy

0:45:43.560 --> 0:45:46.320
<v Speaker 2>in the middle of the goddamn street before it even started.

0:45:47.680 --> 0:45:52.240
<v Speaker 2>But now I'm editorializing so by the time Greg Kantian

0:45:52.280 --> 0:45:57.200
<v Speaker 2>Warren Baylaw file their version of this same suit, Robert

0:45:57.200 --> 0:46:00.239
<v Speaker 2>Turner's suit has already been not only dismissed, but the

0:46:00.239 --> 0:46:04.040
<v Speaker 2>dismissal was upheld on appeal. Again, that's the only one

0:46:04.080 --> 0:46:06.400
<v Speaker 2>of these suits that was brought by a counter protest or,

0:46:06.480 --> 0:46:09.799
<v Speaker 2>so the court is being I guess you could say fair.

0:46:10.080 --> 0:46:13.359
<v Speaker 2>That doesn't feel right, but the court is saying that

0:46:13.840 --> 0:46:16.000
<v Speaker 2>the cops are allowed to watch everybody get their ass

0:46:16.000 --> 0:46:19.640
<v Speaker 2>beat in the streets. It's content neutral. And Jason Kessler

0:46:19.640 --> 0:46:22.160
<v Speaker 2>has had two suits dismissed already, and he filed his

0:46:22.200 --> 0:46:25.240
<v Speaker 2>third lawsuit the same day that Kanti and Baylaw filed THEIRS,

0:46:25.520 --> 0:46:27.560
<v Speaker 2>because it was the last day under the statute of

0:46:27.640 --> 0:46:31.920
<v Speaker 2>limitations to file anything related to that day. But Kanti

0:46:32.000 --> 0:46:35.560
<v Speaker 2>and BiLaw accidentally filed THEIRS in the wrong jurisdiction, so

0:46:35.600 --> 0:46:37.560
<v Speaker 2>by the time it gets transferred to the right court

0:46:37.760 --> 0:46:41.560
<v Speaker 2>almost a year later, Kessler's third and final lawsuit has

0:46:41.600 --> 0:46:44.680
<v Speaker 2>already been torn to shreds and it's been dismissed.

0:46:46.400 --> 0:46:49.560
<v Speaker 1>So all the arguments have been made more than once.

0:46:50.880 --> 0:46:53.319
<v Speaker 2>There isn't much to gain by throwing the same shit

0:46:53.400 --> 0:46:54.840
<v Speaker 2>at the wall. Just to see if it's going to

0:46:54.880 --> 0:46:59.399
<v Speaker 2>stick this time, but they did it anyway.

0:47:00.680 --> 0:47:04.760
<v Speaker 3>So we just did a scattershot thing and sued everybody

0:47:04.800 --> 0:47:08.000
<v Speaker 3>that we thought that we could we could possibly sue,

0:47:08.000 --> 0:47:12.680
<v Speaker 3>and then shoot first, asked questions later. The initial complaint,

0:47:13.280 --> 0:47:16.360
<v Speaker 3>Greg Contey and I had help from Augustus and Victus

0:47:16.680 --> 0:47:18.840
<v Speaker 3>putting it together. But then we've had a lot of

0:47:18.840 --> 0:47:19.520
<v Speaker 3>help with other.

0:47:19.400 --> 0:47:24.160
<v Speaker 1>People and they lost too.

0:47:25.280 --> 0:47:27.840
<v Speaker 2>By twenty twenty three, when the case was finally dismissed,

0:47:28.040 --> 0:47:31.600
<v Speaker 2>Warren Beylaw and Greg Conti weren't even really friends anymore.

0:47:32.400 --> 0:47:35.360
<v Speaker 2>The chaotic end of their short lived Neo Nazi political

0:47:35.400 --> 0:47:40.000
<v Speaker 2>party and the still unresolved allegations that maybe somebody in

0:47:40.080 --> 0:47:43.320
<v Speaker 2>leadership stole tens of thousands of dollars in member donations

0:47:43.960 --> 0:47:46.959
<v Speaker 2>is a story for some other day, But in twenty

0:47:46.960 --> 0:47:50.200
<v Speaker 2>twenty three, it's just Warren Beylaw who files to appeal

0:47:50.239 --> 0:47:55.320
<v Speaker 2>the decision, and now he finally has a lawyer, Glenn Allen.

0:47:57.520 --> 0:48:00.680
<v Speaker 2>When the Fourth Circuit finally upheld the dismissal laws lawsuit

0:48:00.719 --> 0:48:03.959
<v Speaker 2>in twenty twenty four, the opinion takes the case point

0:48:04.000 --> 0:48:07.800
<v Speaker 2>by point. You don't always get that in an appellate decision,

0:48:08.360 --> 0:48:11.160
<v Speaker 2>but I guess they just wanted to make things abundantly

0:48:11.239 --> 0:48:15.480
<v Speaker 2>clear because these guys were obviously having trouble understanding the rulings.

0:48:16.840 --> 0:48:20.560
<v Speaker 2>It's actually kind of brutal in that detached, icy way

0:48:20.600 --> 0:48:24.759
<v Speaker 2>that legal professionals sometimes eviscerate each other. I'll put it

0:48:24.800 --> 0:48:27.080
<v Speaker 2>in the show notes, but i won't get too deep

0:48:27.120 --> 0:48:29.720
<v Speaker 2>into it, because I'm willing to admit that not everyone

0:48:29.760 --> 0:48:32.680
<v Speaker 2>is going to find it as exciting as I did.

0:48:33.320 --> 0:48:37.480
<v Speaker 2>The opinion opens with a question. This appeal asks a

0:48:37.520 --> 0:48:42.400
<v Speaker 2>straightforward legal question, does the First Amendment protect speech amid violence?

0:48:43.440 --> 0:48:46.960
<v Speaker 2>More specifically, does the First Amendment obligate police officers to

0:48:47.000 --> 0:48:51.880
<v Speaker 2>protect the constitutional rights of protesters amid violence. We've already

0:48:51.920 --> 0:48:56.040
<v Speaker 2>suggested that the answer is no, and the citation they

0:48:56.040 --> 0:48:58.479
<v Speaker 2>give for this is their own prior ruling in Jason

0:48:58.560 --> 0:49:02.360
<v Speaker 2>Kessler's lawsuit, which makes the same arguments about the same facts.

0:49:03.680 --> 0:49:08.600
<v Speaker 2>And the opinion continues Warren Baylaw asks that we hold otherwise,

0:49:10.080 --> 0:49:12.080
<v Speaker 2>and after a brief summary of the facts in the case,

0:49:12.160 --> 0:49:15.960
<v Speaker 2>the opinion reads, maylaw would have us seize on these

0:49:16.000 --> 0:49:19.840
<v Speaker 2>facts to transform the First Amendment from a shield to

0:49:19.920 --> 0:49:24.840
<v Speaker 2>guard against invasive speech regulations into a sword to wield

0:49:24.840 --> 0:49:30.240
<v Speaker 2>against violent speech disruptions. We declined to forge such a weapon.

0:49:32.360 --> 0:49:34.719
<v Speaker 2>Glen Allen was still representing We're in baylaw when they

0:49:34.719 --> 0:49:36.560
<v Speaker 2>tried to get this case in front of the Supreme

0:49:36.640 --> 0:49:41.520
<v Speaker 2>Court earlier this year. And I know that Glen Allen

0:49:41.680 --> 0:49:44.520
<v Speaker 2>knows that the police don't have an affirmative duty to

0:49:44.520 --> 0:49:47.719
<v Speaker 2>protect anyone, because until he got fired for being a

0:49:47.760 --> 0:49:51.319
<v Speaker 2>neo Nazi, he was working as a defense attorney representing

0:49:51.360 --> 0:49:56.520
<v Speaker 2>the Baltimore Police Department. So I have to imagine working

0:49:56.600 --> 0:50:02.400
<v Speaker 2>for a notoriously brutal and corrupt police department in the

0:50:02.480 --> 0:50:06.560
<v Speaker 2>Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals, I have to imagine he

0:50:06.640 --> 0:50:09.560
<v Speaker 2>was familiar with cases liked Shaneyy Whin a Bagehope in

0:50:09.640 --> 0:50:14.080
<v Speaker 2>der Vy Johnson, and Castle Rockvey Gonzalez. But he pretends

0:50:14.080 --> 0:50:18.839
<v Speaker 2>not to be writing This breaks perhaps the most fundamental

0:50:18.880 --> 0:50:22.400
<v Speaker 2>pact citizens have with their government. We grant a monopoly

0:50:22.480 --> 0:50:25.560
<v Speaker 2>on violence to the sovereign in exchange for which it

0:50:25.600 --> 0:50:28.680
<v Speaker 2>assumes the duty to provide basic protection to life and limb.

0:50:29.800 --> 0:50:32.600
<v Speaker 2>Once that duty is wilfully abandoned, there is no telling

0:50:32.600 --> 0:50:36.800
<v Speaker 2>where the trouble ends. Well, Glen, I have some shocking

0:50:36.840 --> 0:50:41.960
<v Speaker 2>news for you that pact has been broken. There is

0:50:42.080 --> 0:50:45.960
<v Speaker 2>no pact that the state will protect your life and limb.

0:50:47.840 --> 0:50:50.480
<v Speaker 2>What he's saying is that his client is the victim.

0:50:51.440 --> 0:50:54.080
<v Speaker 2>All the men in that park were just innocently expressing

0:50:54.080 --> 0:50:57.720
<v Speaker 2>their First Amendment rights and I didn't want to hurt anyone.

0:50:58.960 --> 0:51:02.120
<v Speaker 2>They trusted that if someone needed to be hurt, the

0:51:02.160 --> 0:51:04.280
<v Speaker 2>government would do it for them.

0:51:04.880 --> 0:51:05.280
<v Speaker 1>Quote.

0:51:05.800 --> 0:51:09.040
<v Speaker 2>Those citizens who are targeted by both criminal miscreants and

0:51:09.160 --> 0:51:14.279
<v Speaker 2>corrupt government are placed between Scylla and charybdis. Upon seeing

0:51:14.320 --> 0:51:17.040
<v Speaker 2>that their government has relinquished the monopoly on violence, they

0:51:17.040 --> 0:51:19.960
<v Speaker 2>have two options. They can resort to self help and

0:51:20.000 --> 0:51:23.040
<v Speaker 2>take matters into their own hands where they can take

0:51:23.040 --> 0:51:23.480
<v Speaker 2>a beating.

0:51:25.480 --> 0:51:26.840
<v Speaker 1>They had to do it, you see.

0:51:27.680 --> 0:51:31.080
<v Speaker 2>They had to punch, kickshove, choke, beat, bludget a maze

0:51:31.120 --> 0:51:35.480
<v Speaker 2>all of those people. They were defending themselves. Never mind

0:51:35.520 --> 0:51:39.120
<v Speaker 2>the videos that show them organizing themselves into little raiding parties,

0:51:39.760 --> 0:51:42.120
<v Speaker 2>departing the safety of the park to dart out into

0:51:42.120 --> 0:51:44.040
<v Speaker 2>the streets to try to get a few hits in.

0:51:46.120 --> 0:51:50.360
<v Speaker 2>But why not? Why did they try to hurt people?

0:51:50.400 --> 0:51:50.719
<v Speaker 2>I know?

0:51:50.760 --> 0:51:51.080
<v Speaker 5>Why?

0:51:51.880 --> 0:51:55.839
<v Speaker 2>Why appeal a case that can't win, a case that's

0:51:55.880 --> 0:51:59.040
<v Speaker 2>already been argued from every angle, based on the exact

0:51:59.040 --> 0:52:04.120
<v Speaker 2>same underlying to the exact same judge. Why even after

0:52:04.120 --> 0:52:07.560
<v Speaker 2>the Fourth Circuit ruled against him, do they bother trying

0:52:07.560 --> 0:52:10.879
<v Speaker 2>to get it in front of the Supreme Court. I mean,

0:52:10.920 --> 0:52:14.319
<v Speaker 2>I know political wins have shifted and everything's upside down now.

0:52:14.360 --> 0:52:17.240
<v Speaker 2>I'm not so naive that I'm saying there's no sliver

0:52:17.360 --> 0:52:19.680
<v Speaker 2>of hope that maybe the Supreme Court would throw a

0:52:19.760 --> 0:52:22.879
<v Speaker 2>Nazia bone just for fun. I could see why they'd

0:52:22.920 --> 0:52:29.239
<v Speaker 2>be hopeful, but even the most optimistic fascist surely understands

0:52:29.760 --> 0:52:32.719
<v Speaker 2>that as much as the current administration might enjoy their

0:52:32.760 --> 0:52:35.880
<v Speaker 2>willingness to fight the race war, there's just no political

0:52:36.000 --> 0:52:40.239
<v Speaker 2>utility in upsetting the settled case law that keeps cops

0:52:40.320 --> 0:52:43.000
<v Speaker 2>safe from having to do the thing we all like

0:52:43.080 --> 0:52:44.640
<v Speaker 2>to imagine, therefore.

0:52:45.640 --> 0:52:46.600
<v Speaker 1>Protecting and serving.

0:52:48.800 --> 0:52:52.799
<v Speaker 2>But they weren't really fighting to win, were they. I mean,

0:52:52.800 --> 0:52:55.200
<v Speaker 2>some of the arguments being made might lead you to

0:52:55.280 --> 0:52:57.839
<v Speaker 2>believe that they don't know what they're talking about, And

0:52:58.120 --> 0:53:00.440
<v Speaker 2>maybe some of that really was since year and they

0:53:00.440 --> 0:53:05.360
<v Speaker 2>thought it would work, But mostly they knew it was symbolic.

0:53:07.360 --> 0:53:11.040
<v Speaker 2>After the Supreme Court denied their petition last month, Baylaw

0:53:11.080 --> 0:53:15.600
<v Speaker 2>finished his rambling substack posts with this message. Lastly, I

0:53:15.600 --> 0:53:17.799
<v Speaker 2>would like to thank every last man and woman who

0:53:17.800 --> 0:53:20.480
<v Speaker 2>attended the United the Right rally on August eleven and twelfth,

0:53:20.520 --> 0:53:24.839
<v Speaker 2>twenty seventeen. This lawsuit was a symbolic fight for all

0:53:24.880 --> 0:53:27.680
<v Speaker 2>the young men who sacrificed more at Charlesville than I did,

0:53:28.560 --> 0:53:30.600
<v Speaker 2>All those who spent years in prison, who had their

0:53:30.640 --> 0:53:34.960
<v Speaker 2>careers and reputations destroyed, who ended their own lives, who

0:53:35.080 --> 0:53:37.480
<v Speaker 2>still have the threat of imprisonment hanging over their heads.

0:53:38.680 --> 0:53:44.439
<v Speaker 2>For all their sakes, it was worth it. Just days

0:53:44.480 --> 0:53:46.239
<v Speaker 2>after the United the Right rally, all the way back

0:53:46.239 --> 0:53:49.279
<v Speaker 2>in August of twenty seventeen, Beyla wrote an essay for

0:53:49.400 --> 0:53:51.960
<v Speaker 2>Richard Spencer's alright dot com.

0:53:52.480 --> 0:53:53.480
<v Speaker 1>The post ends.

0:53:53.239 --> 0:53:57.279
<v Speaker 2>With we have with us the awakened fury of the

0:53:57.360 --> 0:54:01.360
<v Speaker 2>force which created and built the United States, the righteous

0:54:01.400 --> 0:54:04.239
<v Speaker 2>anger of white men who will not let tyranny tried

0:54:04.320 --> 0:54:09.399
<v Speaker 2>on our rights any longer. They don't think it was fair.

0:54:11.160 --> 0:54:13.279
<v Speaker 2>It doesn't matter what the law says. There are white men.

0:54:14.080 --> 0:54:17.480
<v Speaker 2>They invented the Western world. They created this system of laws,

0:54:17.640 --> 0:54:24.560
<v Speaker 2>or whatever those laws by definition exist for them. The

0:54:24.600 --> 0:54:30.040
<v Speaker 2>court must simply be confused or corrupt, probably corrupt.

0:54:31.320 --> 0:54:31.719
<v Speaker 1>It was a.

0:54:31.640 --> 0:54:36.200
<v Speaker 2>Setup, a cover up, a conspiracy against them. It was

0:54:36.239 --> 0:54:42.000
<v Speaker 2>the Jews, it was the communists. It isn't fair. As

0:54:42.080 --> 0:54:44.759
<v Speaker 2>Jason Kessler said in an interview with Warren Baylaw last

0:54:44.840 --> 0:54:47.880
<v Speaker 2>year on the seventh anniversary of that deadly Nazi.

0:54:47.680 --> 0:54:52.080
<v Speaker 4>Rally, I mean, it's the right thing to do. It's

0:54:52.120 --> 0:54:56.160
<v Speaker 4>what a real political movement does. It's what real activists do.

0:54:56.320 --> 0:54:58.640
<v Speaker 4>They don't just give up and move on. They try

0:54:58.680 --> 0:55:01.520
<v Speaker 4>and fight to the name. And the truth is is,

0:55:01.640 --> 0:55:04.520
<v Speaker 4>you know, we should have won those suits.

0:55:07.560 --> 0:55:08.640
<v Speaker 1>They have to fight back.

0:55:09.719 --> 0:55:14.120
<v Speaker 2>They're all quite sure that they've been wronged, and they

0:55:14.160 --> 0:55:17.799
<v Speaker 2>just can't let it go. I guess, to be fair,

0:55:19.200 --> 0:55:23.920
<v Speaker 2>neither can I. For eight years, I've been trying to

0:55:23.960 --> 0:55:28.479
<v Speaker 2>sort out what really happens when a Nazi rally comes

0:55:28.520 --> 0:55:32.200
<v Speaker 2>to town. I've got a hard drive full of photos

0:55:32.239 --> 0:55:36.400
<v Speaker 2>and videos, diagrams and annotated images, thousands of pages of

0:55:36.440 --> 0:55:39.239
<v Speaker 2>court documents, half a dozen spiral notebooks with my own

0:55:39.280 --> 0:55:43.000
<v Speaker 2>handwritten court room notes. I've written about it for publications,

0:55:43.040 --> 0:55:46.440
<v Speaker 2>for my own website, and for podcasts. I've live tweeted

0:55:46.480 --> 0:55:50.520
<v Speaker 2>a month long trial, and I still don't really know

0:55:50.600 --> 0:55:54.239
<v Speaker 2>the answer. This may be the only thing the court

0:55:54.280 --> 0:55:58.759
<v Speaker 2>has been one hundred percent clear and consistent on. You

0:55:58.880 --> 0:56:02.560
<v Speaker 2>absolutely do not have any right to expect a cop

0:56:02.640 --> 0:56:06.880
<v Speaker 2>to help you if he doesn't feel like it, not

0:56:06.960 --> 0:56:09.719
<v Speaker 2>even if he promised, not even if it would be

0:56:09.760 --> 0:56:11.960
<v Speaker 2>easy for him to do it, not even if it

0:56:11.960 --> 0:56:15.520
<v Speaker 2>would save your life. It's not a violation of anyone's

0:56:15.600 --> 0:56:20.120
<v Speaker 2>rights for a public servant to stand completely still and

0:56:20.239 --> 0:56:25.319
<v Speaker 2>watch you die. It's a little bit funny to see crime.

0:56:25.320 --> 0:56:28.560
<v Speaker 2>Maybe Nazis sending themselves into hysterics insisting that they have

0:56:28.560 --> 0:56:31.040
<v Speaker 2>a constitutional right to see Kyle in the park with

0:56:31.080 --> 0:56:37.640
<v Speaker 2>police protection. They're not entitled to that protection, but neither

0:56:37.640 --> 0:56:41.319
<v Speaker 2>are you. Neither were my neighbors who were beaten in

0:56:41.320 --> 0:56:46.000
<v Speaker 2>the streets. Neither were Jessica Gonzalez's daughters or Carol Pinder's children.

0:56:47.480 --> 0:56:52.319
<v Speaker 2>The police have absolutely no duty to protect us. They

0:56:52.360 --> 0:56:55.640
<v Speaker 2>have plenty of power to hurt us, and they're well

0:56:55.680 --> 0:56:58.560
<v Speaker 2>within the bounds of the law to passively create conditions

0:56:58.600 --> 0:57:02.400
<v Speaker 2>where neo Nazis are free to hurt us with impunity.

0:57:03.440 --> 0:57:08.719
<v Speaker 2>They may have no duty to us, but please try

0:57:08.719 --> 0:57:11.879
<v Speaker 2>to remember we all have a duty to each other,

0:57:13.280 --> 0:57:29.160
<v Speaker 2>so be good to your neighbors and keep each other safe.

0:57:30.360 --> 0:57:32.280
<v Speaker 2>Weird Little Guys the same production of Pool Zone Media

0:57:32.320 --> 0:57:36.000
<v Speaker 2>and iHeartRadio. It's research, written and recorded by me, Molly Conger.

0:57:36.680 --> 0:57:39.760
<v Speaker 2>Our executive producers are Sophie Lichterman and Robert Evans. The

0:57:39.800 --> 0:57:42.920
<v Speaker 2>show is edited by the wildly talented Mary Gigan. The

0:57:42.920 --> 0:57:45.840
<v Speaker 2>theme music was composed by Brad Dickert. You can email

0:57:45.880 --> 0:57:48.160
<v Speaker 2>me at Weird Little Guys podcast at gmail dot com.

0:57:48.200 --> 0:57:50.480
<v Speaker 2>I will definitely read it, but I probably won't answer it.

0:57:50.480 --> 0:57:52.960
<v Speaker 2>It's nothing personal. I don't answer any of my emails.

0:57:53.680 --> 0:57:56.000
<v Speaker 2>You can exchange conspiracy theories about the show with other

0:57:56.040 --> 0:58:00.200
<v Speaker 2>listeners on the Weird Little Guys supreddit. Just don't most

0:58:00.240 --> 0:58:01.800
<v Speaker 2>anything that's going to make you on my words, Little

0:58:01.800 --> 0:58:02.080
<v Speaker 2>Guys

0:58:10.560 --> 0:58:10.960
<v Speaker 1>Mhm