WEBVTT - What Should You Do With Climate Despair? A Conversation with Wen Stephenson

0:00:06.960 --> 0:00:10.400
<v Speaker 1>Hello, and welcome back to Drilled. I'm Amy Westervelt. Today

0:00:10.440 --> 0:00:14.240
<v Speaker 1>we are bringing you another one of our Drilling Deep

0:00:14.520 --> 0:00:19.520
<v Speaker 1>series in which Adam Lowenstein talks to an author about

0:00:19.680 --> 0:00:25.240
<v Speaker 1>a recent book that touches on climate, or politics, or democracy,

0:00:25.600 --> 0:00:30.800
<v Speaker 1>or some combination thereof. Today Adam speaks with when Stephenson,

0:00:31.000 --> 0:00:34.520
<v Speaker 1>the journalist, an activist, and author of the new book

0:00:34.720 --> 0:00:37.520
<v Speaker 1>Learning to Live in the Dark, essays in a Time

0:00:37.560 --> 0:00:41.640
<v Speaker 1>of Catastrophe. In it, Stevenson argues that the only way

0:00:41.720 --> 0:00:44.800
<v Speaker 1>to confront the crises of our time is to meet

0:00:44.920 --> 0:00:48.000
<v Speaker 1>despair head on, to see it for what it is,

0:00:48.040 --> 0:00:50.720
<v Speaker 1>to feel it, and to accept what it means about

0:00:50.760 --> 0:00:54.000
<v Speaker 1>where we are and where we need to go. Over

0:00:54.040 --> 0:00:58.000
<v Speaker 1>the summer, Adam spoke with Stevenson about how he processes

0:00:58.040 --> 0:01:02.880
<v Speaker 1>his own climate despair, what scholars of totalitarianism like Hannah

0:01:03.000 --> 0:01:06.920
<v Speaker 1>Arentt and Albert Camu can teach us about fossil fascism,

0:01:07.480 --> 0:01:10.959
<v Speaker 1>and whether a mass movement for climate action might not

0:01:11.160 --> 0:01:16.280
<v Speaker 1>come together until enough people are desperate enough. This conversation

0:01:16.640 --> 0:01:20.320
<v Speaker 1>is a lot like how Stevenson describes his book. It's

0:01:20.360 --> 0:01:23.800
<v Speaker 1>about how to live into this era of climate and

0:01:23.840 --> 0:01:28.240
<v Speaker 1>political and social catastrophe. While holding on to our humanity.

0:01:29.440 --> 0:01:31.400
<v Speaker 1>Just a note before we get into it that this

0:01:31.520 --> 0:01:36.240
<v Speaker 1>conversation does briefly discuss suicide. If you are in crisis,

0:01:36.400 --> 0:01:39.360
<v Speaker 1>please call or text or chat with the Suicide and

0:01:39.440 --> 0:01:42.560
<v Speaker 1>Crisis Lifeline at nine to eighty eight, or contact the

0:01:42.680 --> 0:01:47.840
<v Speaker 1>crisis text line by texting talk tl K to seven

0:01:47.960 --> 0:01:51.480
<v Speaker 1>four to one, seven four one. Here's Adam and.

0:01:51.480 --> 0:02:00.160
<v Speaker 2>When m.

0:02:05.680 --> 0:02:08.959
<v Speaker 3>As a starting point, I wanted to ask you how

0:02:09.000 --> 0:02:12.359
<v Speaker 3>you're feeling about having this book out in the world,

0:02:12.560 --> 0:02:14.640
<v Speaker 3>because there's a lot of a lot of you and

0:02:14.680 --> 0:02:18.360
<v Speaker 3>a lot of processing in the book that is now

0:02:18.880 --> 0:02:23.040
<v Speaker 3>available for everyone to see and feel and read.

0:02:24.040 --> 0:02:28.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean, uh, it feels it's strange. I mean,

0:02:28.280 --> 0:02:34.440
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I've written personal essays for a long time. Uh.

0:02:34.480 --> 0:02:36.440
<v Speaker 2>And you know it's worth it's worth noting off the top,

0:02:36.520 --> 0:02:38.800
<v Speaker 2>right that like, the vast majority of this book is

0:02:38.840 --> 0:02:42.360
<v Speaker 2>not about me. Uh, there's a there's some very personal

0:02:42.760 --> 0:02:46.560
<v Speaker 2>stuff in it, of course, but but and and that

0:02:46.720 --> 0:02:49.919
<v Speaker 2>runs kind of as a thread through the through the essays,

0:02:50.000 --> 0:02:52.079
<v Speaker 2>you know, all the way to the end. But but

0:02:52.160 --> 0:02:54.480
<v Speaker 2>the vast, vast majority of the book is not about me.

0:02:54.600 --> 0:02:58.799
<v Speaker 2>But you know, it's a it's a risk, right, it's

0:02:58.840 --> 0:03:01.240
<v Speaker 2>a risk one takes as a writer if you're going

0:03:01.280 --> 0:03:05.880
<v Speaker 2>to get personal, and it's even a risk of another

0:03:06.560 --> 0:03:10.040
<v Speaker 2>of a special kind as a you know, and I understand,

0:03:10.120 --> 0:03:14.320
<v Speaker 2>I understand why the reasons why, just as a you know,

0:03:14.560 --> 0:03:19.400
<v Speaker 2>a white straight cismle you know, writing on the you know,

0:03:20.680 --> 0:03:25.480
<v Speaker 2>within the left, you know, to kind of be personal

0:03:25.560 --> 0:03:28.840
<v Speaker 2>because it's like, well, why should my story matter that much?

0:03:28.919 --> 0:03:33.920
<v Speaker 2>You know? And I try to acknowledge that obviously off

0:03:33.919 --> 0:03:38.080
<v Speaker 2>the top, like what are my struggles compared to you know,

0:03:38.680 --> 0:03:41.240
<v Speaker 2>you know, the vast majority of people on the planet,

0:03:41.440 --> 0:03:43.880
<v Speaker 2>you know, right, you know, and even in my own

0:03:43.880 --> 0:03:45.080
<v Speaker 2>community for that matter.

0:03:46.200 --> 0:03:48.560
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I wrestle with that idea of it almost feels

0:03:48.600 --> 0:03:51.560
<v Speaker 3>indulgent sometimes. I don't think it does to most people.

0:03:51.960 --> 0:03:54.640
<v Speaker 3>On the other side, your book did not feel indulgent

0:03:54.720 --> 0:03:56.880
<v Speaker 3>or self indulgent to me, But it can feel that

0:03:56.920 --> 0:03:59.000
<v Speaker 3>way from the writer's perspective.

0:03:58.600 --> 0:04:01.320
<v Speaker 2>Right exactly. And so and that's why we have editors,

0:04:01.360 --> 0:04:04.760
<v Speaker 2>and that's why we you know, that's why you know,

0:04:05.320 --> 0:04:07.480
<v Speaker 2>this was not a blog, right, I mean, I'm not

0:04:07.720 --> 0:04:13.960
<v Speaker 2>just spewing this out there. This is very carefully considered,

0:04:14.120 --> 0:04:17.840
<v Speaker 2>you know, writing. But I do think it's important to

0:04:17.880 --> 0:04:20.800
<v Speaker 2>bring the personal. It can be important, you know, to

0:04:20.839 --> 0:04:24.520
<v Speaker 2>bring the personal into books like this. I mean, maybe

0:04:24.520 --> 0:04:27.159
<v Speaker 2>it's worth saying just like what kind of a book

0:04:27.160 --> 0:04:30.480
<v Speaker 2>this is and what kind it's not, and like why

0:04:30.520 --> 0:04:34.880
<v Speaker 2>I wrote it. I mean, it's definitely a climate book, right,

0:04:35.520 --> 0:04:38.320
<v Speaker 2>but I mean that is the overarching and the and

0:04:38.360 --> 0:04:42.599
<v Speaker 2>the and the unifying kind of you know, thread or

0:04:42.720 --> 0:04:45.120
<v Speaker 2>theme you know of the book. And I'm a climate

0:04:45.160 --> 0:04:48.240
<v Speaker 2>writer and a climate activist and so on. But it's

0:04:48.320 --> 0:04:51.200
<v Speaker 2>it's really not a typical climate book, at least I

0:04:51.200 --> 0:04:53.800
<v Speaker 2>think the way that usually is that, you know, is

0:04:54.320 --> 0:04:57.880
<v Speaker 2>the term is used in the publishing world, you know,

0:04:57.880 --> 0:05:01.120
<v Speaker 2>because it's not a policy book, and it's not a

0:05:01.200 --> 0:05:02.920
<v Speaker 2>solutions book, you.

0:05:02.800 --> 0:05:06.800
<v Speaker 4>Know, which I found very refreshing. Okay, I'll probably get

0:05:06.839 --> 0:05:07.960
<v Speaker 4>into that a little bit later.

0:05:08.080 --> 0:05:10.159
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, yeah we should. We should. There's lots to

0:05:10.160 --> 0:05:13.320
<v Speaker 2>be said about that. But it is, as you've noted,

0:05:13.360 --> 0:05:16.279
<v Speaker 2>it's a very personal book and you know, and it's

0:05:16.279 --> 0:05:18.800
<v Speaker 2>and it's a very literary book, right, I mean, it's

0:05:19.400 --> 0:05:23.839
<v Speaker 2>it's it's about much of it. Most of it. These

0:05:23.920 --> 0:05:28.719
<v Speaker 2>essays are about writers and thinkers, you know, and and yeah,

0:05:28.720 --> 0:05:32.920
<v Speaker 2>there's a certain amount of political analysis, and you know,

0:05:33.000 --> 0:05:38.800
<v Speaker 2>even polemic in the book. For sure, that's certainly part

0:05:38.800 --> 0:05:40.440
<v Speaker 2>of it and part of who I am as a writer,

0:05:40.560 --> 0:05:43.240
<v Speaker 2>and you know, but but more than that, I think

0:05:43.400 --> 0:05:46.520
<v Speaker 2>it's what it is essentially, is a kind of moral

0:05:46.640 --> 0:05:51.719
<v Speaker 2>ethical inquiry into as kind of the title implies, like

0:05:51.800 --> 0:05:57.560
<v Speaker 2>how to live into this era of climate and political

0:05:57.600 --> 0:06:03.600
<v Speaker 2>and social catastrophe that's upon us while holding on to

0:06:03.720 --> 0:06:07.280
<v Speaker 2>our humanity. I mean that that phrase, you know, can

0:06:07.320 --> 0:06:09.920
<v Speaker 2>become a cliche, of course, but I hope that in

0:06:09.920 --> 0:06:12.040
<v Speaker 2>my book it's not, because I try to go very

0:06:12.440 --> 0:06:17.479
<v Speaker 2>deeply into what that means under various you know, various scenarios,

0:06:17.520 --> 0:06:18.960
<v Speaker 2>and what it has meant in the past, and what

0:06:19.000 --> 0:06:22.960
<v Speaker 2>there is to learn, you know, from writers and thinkers

0:06:23.040 --> 0:06:25.760
<v Speaker 2>of the past, so on that kind of personal level.

0:06:26.800 --> 0:06:30.039
<v Speaker 2>You know, when I was in my really darkest moments

0:06:30.080 --> 0:06:33.400
<v Speaker 2>in sort of twenty sixteen twenty seventeen, like a lot

0:06:33.400 --> 0:06:37.200
<v Speaker 2>of other people, you know, and then again at various

0:06:37.240 --> 0:06:39.440
<v Speaker 2>times over these last eight years, as I was writing

0:06:39.440 --> 0:06:43.279
<v Speaker 2>this series of essays, I went looking I kind of

0:06:43.320 --> 0:06:48.919
<v Speaker 2>instinctively reached for a certain group of writers and thinkers

0:06:49.120 --> 0:06:52.560
<v Speaker 2>of the mid twentieth century, you know, these kind of iconic,

0:06:53.400 --> 0:06:55.120
<v Speaker 2>and I it certainly wasn't the only person doing this

0:06:55.160 --> 0:06:57.279
<v Speaker 2>in twenty sixteen, twenty seventeen, you know, but these like

0:06:57.520 --> 0:07:03.359
<v Speaker 2>iconic anti fascist and anti totalitarian thinkers and writers like

0:07:03.680 --> 0:07:09.240
<v Speaker 2>Hannah Arendt and Albert Camu and Simon Vais and others,

0:07:09.279 --> 0:07:11.280
<v Speaker 2>you know. And I even ended up, you know, looking

0:07:11.520 --> 0:07:15.880
<v Speaker 2>very closely at the great anti colonial revolutionary fronts, finol.

0:07:16.000 --> 0:07:19.120
<v Speaker 2>You know, that's where the book ends up. And I

0:07:19.240 --> 0:07:22.640
<v Speaker 2>was looking for a sort of like the intellectual and

0:07:22.760 --> 0:07:29.760
<v Speaker 2>moral and even spiritual sources of or resources sort of

0:07:29.840 --> 0:07:33.240
<v Speaker 2>like for not as I say, you know, not hope,

0:07:34.760 --> 0:07:38.120
<v Speaker 2>because I feel that term and that concept is kind

0:07:38.120 --> 0:07:42.120
<v Speaker 2>of abstract and is means many different things to different people.

0:07:42.120 --> 0:07:44.920
<v Speaker 4>But more like we'll get into that a bit, like yeah, weinge.

0:07:44.760 --> 0:07:48.000
<v Speaker 2>Into that too, more like, as I say, resolve. What

0:07:48.080 --> 0:07:51.960
<v Speaker 2>I needed was resolve to just stay in the fight.

0:07:52.480 --> 0:07:56.200
<v Speaker 2>And so you know, I went looking for a reason

0:07:56.240 --> 0:07:59.680
<v Speaker 2>to live and to keep fighting. And what I found

0:07:59.680 --> 0:08:04.880
<v Speaker 2>in these writers and others, you know, including contemporaries of ours,

0:08:05.520 --> 0:08:11.000
<v Speaker 2>is really universal human solidarity. I mean, that's that's what

0:08:11.160 --> 0:08:15.600
<v Speaker 2>I found and or had reaffirmed for me, you know.

0:08:16.400 --> 0:08:19.720
<v Speaker 2>And I mean like across all our divisions of race

0:08:20.040 --> 0:08:25.600
<v Speaker 2>and gender and class and ideology and religion, you know,

0:08:25.840 --> 0:08:29.120
<v Speaker 2>just probably the most important quote in the book, or

0:08:29.160 --> 0:08:30.680
<v Speaker 2>one of them. There are a lot of quotes in

0:08:30.720 --> 0:08:35.040
<v Speaker 2>this book, maybe the most important, the one that means

0:08:35.080 --> 0:08:37.400
<v Speaker 2>the most to me. I use as one of the

0:08:37.400 --> 0:08:42.400
<v Speaker 2>epigraphs for the book. It's from Camu's novel The Plague, which,

0:08:43.360 --> 0:08:45.320
<v Speaker 2>if you or anyone else listening to this has not

0:08:45.360 --> 0:08:49.079
<v Speaker 2>read Camu's The Plague, I highly recommend it. But it's

0:08:49.120 --> 0:08:53.880
<v Speaker 2>where the main character, Doctor Rue is talking to priest

0:08:54.080 --> 0:08:57.880
<v Speaker 2>Father Parlous. The doctor says to the priest at a

0:08:58.200 --> 0:09:02.880
<v Speaker 2>very intense moment in their fight against the plague, we're

0:09:02.920 --> 0:09:07.760
<v Speaker 2>fighting for something that brings us together, beyond blasphemys and prayers.

0:09:08.800 --> 0:09:13.240
<v Speaker 2>It's all that matters when I look at across our movements,

0:09:13.280 --> 0:09:17.160
<v Speaker 2>you know, on the left, and I think about my

0:09:17.280 --> 0:09:21.000
<v Speaker 2>comrades and just and I think about members of my

0:09:21.040 --> 0:09:25.280
<v Speaker 2>own family who are deeply conservative. For that matter, I'm

0:09:25.320 --> 0:09:28.800
<v Speaker 2>looking for, you know, what it is that could actually

0:09:28.800 --> 0:09:33.320
<v Speaker 2>hold us together in the face of just now unimaginable

0:09:34.240 --> 0:09:40.040
<v Speaker 2>you know, suffering and oppression and pain, you know, and darkness.

0:09:40.360 --> 0:09:46.200
<v Speaker 3>That gets at something that we've sometimes explicitly throughout the book,

0:09:46.240 --> 0:09:50.960
<v Speaker 3>which is this idea of despair? Yeah, and I think

0:09:51.040 --> 0:09:54.800
<v Speaker 3>to say that the book is just you processing a

0:09:54.880 --> 0:09:56.800
<v Speaker 3>sense of despair, it is that, but it's a lot

0:09:56.880 --> 0:10:02.559
<v Speaker 3>more than that. And you go two great lengths to

0:10:02.600 --> 0:10:08.000
<v Speaker 3>differentiate despair from nihilism or on the other end of

0:10:08.040 --> 0:10:11.960
<v Speaker 3>the feel good spectrum, optimism and hope. As we talked

0:10:11.960 --> 0:10:17.240
<v Speaker 3>about briefly before, can you talk about what despair how

0:10:17.280 --> 0:10:21.079
<v Speaker 3>you think about despair in the context of the climate crisis.

0:10:21.600 --> 0:10:26.000
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely, you're right, I mean this is central. I mean,

0:10:26.000 --> 0:10:28.200
<v Speaker 2>this is the title of the book, right, how to learn,

0:10:28.400 --> 0:10:33.240
<v Speaker 2>you know, learning to Live in the Dark, which was

0:10:33.720 --> 0:10:36.720
<v Speaker 2>the title. It's sort of the title essay of the book.

0:10:37.120 --> 0:10:40.240
<v Speaker 2>My essay on Hannah Arendt in the Time of Trump

0:10:40.240 --> 0:10:42.880
<v Speaker 2>and Climate was the first essay I really wrote in

0:10:42.880 --> 0:10:47.320
<v Speaker 2>this series back in twenty seventeen. I was looking for

0:10:47.800 --> 0:10:52.400
<v Speaker 2>someone who could help me, you know, confront really look

0:10:52.440 --> 0:10:58.840
<v Speaker 2>into the abyss, right, and there are few who did

0:10:58.840 --> 0:11:07.160
<v Speaker 2>that kind of more productively than Hannah Arendt. Okay, Yeah,

0:11:07.240 --> 0:11:09.679
<v Speaker 2>I guess the first thing that's important to say is

0:11:10.160 --> 0:11:15.640
<v Speaker 2>that given what we're up against, right, that despair is warranted.

0:11:16.200 --> 0:11:20.720
<v Speaker 2>That's really central for me, and that it's not you know,

0:11:20.800 --> 0:11:23.679
<v Speaker 2>I say this kind of flippantly, but not really because

0:11:24.200 --> 0:11:28.280
<v Speaker 2>I say, you know, it's not a sin, right, I mean,

0:11:28.720 --> 0:11:30.880
<v Speaker 2>you know for Catholics it's like one, I'm not Catholic,

0:11:30.960 --> 0:11:35.520
<v Speaker 2>but I was raised in a conservative Christian family. But

0:11:36.200 --> 0:11:39.440
<v Speaker 2>you know, despair is not a sin, okay, as some

0:11:39.520 --> 0:11:44.120
<v Speaker 2>would say. It's not like moral weakness or a flaw

0:11:44.240 --> 0:11:48.679
<v Speaker 2>in your character. It's entirely understandable. In fact, it's rational

0:11:48.840 --> 0:11:52.480
<v Speaker 2>on some level. But but given those caveats, right, it

0:11:52.920 --> 0:11:57.720
<v Speaker 2>is dangerous. It can lead to some very dark places

0:11:57.800 --> 0:12:02.480
<v Speaker 2>almost by definition, right, it is those dark places, and

0:12:02.480 --> 0:12:07.079
<v Speaker 2>and so it's dangerous, and it's defeating, you know, especially politically,

0:12:07.120 --> 0:12:10.760
<v Speaker 2>like for anyone engaged in social and political movements, it's defeating.

0:12:11.480 --> 0:12:15.400
<v Speaker 2>So it's something that needs to be worked through, preferably

0:12:15.440 --> 0:12:20.480
<v Speaker 2>with others, like preferably in community, right if possible, or

0:12:20.640 --> 0:12:25.360
<v Speaker 2>you know, like myself, with a therapist. You knows, as

0:12:25.760 --> 0:12:29.800
<v Speaker 2>I did and still do. You know, but I think

0:12:29.880 --> 0:12:34.079
<v Speaker 2>I can honestly say that I've I've learned to live

0:12:34.240 --> 0:12:38.800
<v Speaker 2>with despair or you know, even the kind that has

0:12:38.920 --> 0:12:43.040
<v Speaker 2>led me at times to question my own desire to live,

0:12:43.559 --> 0:12:48.280
<v Speaker 2>you know, like I've never really been truly like in

0:12:48.320 --> 0:12:51.760
<v Speaker 2>a suicidal place, Like I've never attempted to end my life,

0:12:52.440 --> 0:12:55.160
<v Speaker 2>but i've but I've been close to that, I think,

0:12:55.520 --> 0:12:58.880
<v Speaker 2>And and it's worth also saying that, you know, anyone

0:12:58.960 --> 0:13:03.160
<v Speaker 2>listening to this, if that's where you are or you

0:13:03.200 --> 0:13:07.320
<v Speaker 2>know have been there or are there now, please please

0:13:07.760 --> 0:13:10.880
<v Speaker 2>like talk to talk to someone, Talk to your friends,

0:13:11.000 --> 0:13:15.160
<v Speaker 2>talk to your closest friends or loved ones, someone you trust,

0:13:15.400 --> 0:13:17.120
<v Speaker 2>you know, if you need to talk to a therapist,

0:13:17.160 --> 0:13:23.680
<v Speaker 2>please reach out. The National Suicide Prevention Hotline is nine

0:13:23.720 --> 0:13:26.880
<v Speaker 2>to eight eight. Yeah, I mean, I take this. I

0:13:26.920 --> 0:13:29.120
<v Speaker 2>take this very seriously. I don't I don't lightly write

0:13:29.160 --> 0:13:32.040
<v Speaker 2>about this, you know, it's a I take it seriously

0:13:32.080 --> 0:13:34.679
<v Speaker 2>as a response, you know, my responsibility as a writer

0:13:35.280 --> 0:13:38.880
<v Speaker 2>broaching this topic in public. But really, uh, you know,

0:13:39.080 --> 0:13:41.440
<v Speaker 2>we don't want to lose you. You know, we don't

0:13:41.440 --> 0:13:44.559
<v Speaker 2>want to lose anyone. We can't afford to lose you.

0:13:44.559 --> 0:13:47.160
<v Speaker 2>You know, you're needed and you're loved, and there is

0:13:47.240 --> 0:13:49.640
<v Speaker 2>help if you reach out for it. So I just

0:13:49.640 --> 0:13:52.880
<v Speaker 2>want to say that. But there's more, so much more

0:13:52.880 --> 0:13:54.800
<v Speaker 2>to be said on this. But I guess the most

0:13:54.800 --> 0:13:58.000
<v Speaker 2>important thing also is that about you know, the way

0:13:58.040 --> 0:14:01.240
<v Speaker 2>I come at it in this book is I found

0:14:01.280 --> 0:14:04.840
<v Speaker 2>that what's required for me to live with my despair, Like,

0:14:04.880 --> 0:14:08.120
<v Speaker 2>I don't believe this despair is like an end point.

0:14:08.400 --> 0:14:12.000
<v Speaker 2>There was a beautiful essay by Hanef Abdekery in The

0:14:12.080 --> 0:14:15.600
<v Speaker 2>New Yorker recently about despair. I think it was called

0:14:15.640 --> 0:14:16.840
<v Speaker 2>in Defense of Despair.

0:14:17.240 --> 0:14:19.560
<v Speaker 4>I think I saw that beautiful essay.

0:14:19.600 --> 0:14:23.400
<v Speaker 2>I highly recommend it, and and it wasn't really at

0:14:23.400 --> 0:14:26.240
<v Speaker 2>all about climate change or anything. But one of the

0:14:26.240 --> 0:14:28.760
<v Speaker 2>main points he was making is that it doesn't have

0:14:28.840 --> 0:14:32.000
<v Speaker 2>to be an end point. You know, something that it's

0:14:32.040 --> 0:14:34.160
<v Speaker 2>not giving up, right, it's not giving up. It's something

0:14:34.160 --> 0:14:36.480
<v Speaker 2>that you can work through and learn to live with.

0:14:36.600 --> 0:14:38.400
<v Speaker 2>Because I can say, even though I've learned to live

0:14:38.400 --> 0:14:41.200
<v Speaker 2>with it, it's still there, right, It's still in me.

0:14:42.480 --> 0:14:44.560
<v Speaker 2>So what I found I needed was not just some

0:14:44.680 --> 0:14:48.760
<v Speaker 2>kind of quote unquote hope you know which I mean,

0:14:48.800 --> 0:14:50.960
<v Speaker 2>what does that word even mean anymore in the context

0:14:50.960 --> 0:14:53.720
<v Speaker 2>of climate like we really have to I mean, now,

0:14:53.760 --> 0:14:55.240
<v Speaker 2>I know a lot of people do use that term

0:14:55.240 --> 0:14:58.000
<v Speaker 2>and have written about it beautifully, and so I think

0:14:58.040 --> 0:15:00.760
<v Speaker 2>there are good answers to that. But but I just

0:15:00.840 --> 0:15:04.880
<v Speaker 2>needed something sturdier, like I needed, like I said, resolve,

0:15:05.080 --> 0:15:08.920
<v Speaker 2>Like for me, hope is abstract, it's you know, resolve

0:15:09.000 --> 0:15:12.640
<v Speaker 2>is visceral. It's like in your body, it's what you Yeah.

0:15:12.680 --> 0:15:17.720
<v Speaker 2>So I had to actually kind of let go of hope,

0:15:18.520 --> 0:15:22.600
<v Speaker 2>you know, any kind of abstract, cost free hope, you know,

0:15:22.680 --> 0:15:25.680
<v Speaker 2>in order to find my resolve.

0:15:26.080 --> 0:15:28.480
<v Speaker 3>When it comes to thinking about despair. I think I've

0:15:28.520 --> 0:15:33.640
<v Speaker 3>found that the honesty around it to be pretty refreshing

0:15:34.000 --> 0:15:37.880
<v Speaker 3>and feels like if we are to confront this, this

0:15:38.040 --> 0:15:41.920
<v Speaker 3>crisis of our making pretending it's not so bad, it's

0:15:42.000 --> 0:15:44.600
<v Speaker 3>probably not a good place to start.

0:15:45.080 --> 0:15:47.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Yeah, I know that that's very well said, and

0:15:47.400 --> 0:15:51.040
<v Speaker 2>I think that that's really partly what's been driving me

0:15:51.160 --> 0:15:54.320
<v Speaker 2>for several years and writing about this. You know, I

0:15:54.400 --> 0:15:56.360
<v Speaker 2>want to give a shout out because I think there

0:15:56.360 --> 0:15:59.200
<v Speaker 2>are other writers that, certainly in the climate space, who

0:15:59.360 --> 0:16:02.280
<v Speaker 2>have have done this. I'm certainly not the only one,

0:16:02.400 --> 0:16:06.600
<v Speaker 2>and shout out to Mary Heglar, who I know as

0:16:06.640 --> 0:16:12.120
<v Speaker 2>a friend of drill and is someone who I think

0:16:12.200 --> 0:16:15.800
<v Speaker 2>has has done a wonderful job over the years of

0:16:15.800 --> 0:16:18.720
<v Speaker 2>being of that emotional honesty you know, that kind of

0:16:19.320 --> 0:16:22.880
<v Speaker 2>not just intellectual honesty, but emotional honesty about about dealing

0:16:22.920 --> 0:16:26.080
<v Speaker 2>with this, uh, with this stuff. And you know, I

0:16:26.080 --> 0:16:29.040
<v Speaker 2>think if if there's something I can say that is,

0:16:29.480 --> 0:16:32.000
<v Speaker 2>you know, for lack of a better word, hopeful.

0:16:33.040 --> 0:16:33.880
<v Speaker 4>I am pro hope.

0:16:34.080 --> 0:16:34.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:16:35.000 --> 0:16:37.920
<v Speaker 3>I actually think I think choosing hope is the only

0:16:37.960 --> 0:16:38.680
<v Speaker 3>way forward.

0:16:38.800 --> 0:16:39.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:16:39.080 --> 0:16:41.760
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, And I think it can coexist with despair in

0:16:41.800 --> 0:16:44.600
<v Speaker 3>a way that you you managed to thread that needle

0:16:44.600 --> 0:16:45.520
<v Speaker 3>in this book.

0:16:45.360 --> 0:16:47.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and and to not And just to be clear,

0:16:47.840 --> 0:16:50.480
<v Speaker 2>like I know plenty of people who have who have

0:16:50.600 --> 0:16:57.720
<v Speaker 2>found their way to a more complex and deeper meaning

0:16:57.800 --> 0:17:01.800
<v Speaker 2>of hope than the kind of simplistic, you know version,

0:17:01.880 --> 0:17:05.480
<v Speaker 2>that shallow version that it gets thrown around so often.

0:17:05.520 --> 0:17:08.359
<v Speaker 2>But and I deeply respect that. And well, you know

0:17:08.400 --> 0:17:10.840
<v Speaker 2>what those folks and I are probably talking about the

0:17:10.840 --> 0:17:13.600
<v Speaker 2>same exact thing. You know, I've just found some other

0:17:13.680 --> 0:17:16.680
<v Speaker 2>words for it. But if I could say something, you know, yeah,

0:17:16.880 --> 0:17:22.080
<v Speaker 2>like positive, it's that I think what I have found

0:17:22.240 --> 0:17:26.600
<v Speaker 2>is that for me, the resolve is found in relationship

0:17:27.080 --> 0:17:30.560
<v Speaker 2>to other people. It's found in other people, It's found

0:17:30.560 --> 0:17:33.280
<v Speaker 2>in each other. Right, Like the title of my first

0:17:33.320 --> 0:17:35.800
<v Speaker 2>book was what We're fighting For? Now is each other right,

0:17:37.359 --> 0:17:39.719
<v Speaker 2>And so for me, the source of my resolve is

0:17:39.760 --> 0:17:44.679
<v Speaker 2>that human solidarity. It's it's you. You know, it's you, Adam,

0:17:44.720 --> 0:17:48.159
<v Speaker 2>It's you and all the folks that drilled and everybody

0:17:48.440 --> 0:17:51.960
<v Speaker 2>listening to this podcast. You know, it's like, y'all are

0:17:52.080 --> 0:17:55.800
<v Speaker 2>the source of my resolve at the end of the day.

0:17:55.880 --> 0:17:57.879
<v Speaker 2>And I think that what I you know, I've found

0:17:57.880 --> 0:18:00.240
<v Speaker 2>over the course of a decade and a half working

0:18:00.320 --> 0:18:03.000
<v Speaker 2>in social movements, you know, mainly the climate justice movement,

0:18:03.080 --> 0:18:05.800
<v Speaker 2>is that's what it is for most people. That's what

0:18:06.000 --> 0:18:09.400
<v Speaker 2>keeps us going is each other and that sense of solidarity.

0:18:09.760 --> 0:18:14.440
<v Speaker 2>That might sound somewhat pat or something, but sometimes the

0:18:14.640 --> 0:18:17.000
<v Speaker 2>simple things, simple statements are true.

0:18:17.440 --> 0:18:20.560
<v Speaker 3>I don't think it does sound pat, although I like you,

0:18:20.640 --> 0:18:22.480
<v Speaker 3>I understand how people could take it that way. In

0:18:22.480 --> 0:18:24.879
<v Speaker 3>part for something that you for a reason you mentioned

0:18:24.880 --> 0:18:26.399
<v Speaker 3>in the book, or at least that you touch on

0:18:26.440 --> 0:18:29.879
<v Speaker 3>in the book, is words like solidarity are too often

0:18:30.119 --> 0:18:33.080
<v Speaker 3>thrown around. But the idea of solidarity, and I think

0:18:33.119 --> 0:18:36.679
<v Speaker 3>you discussed it in the context of global solidarity. We

0:18:36.840 --> 0:18:39.000
<v Speaker 3>like to talk about it, but it's the phrase in

0:18:39.000 --> 0:18:40.760
<v Speaker 3>some ways has become almost meaningless.

0:18:41.080 --> 0:18:45.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, well it is meaningless without the kind of action

0:18:45.240 --> 0:18:49.040
<v Speaker 2>that's really required in order to body it and to

0:18:50.280 --> 0:18:53.639
<v Speaker 2>you know, make it real. And I would also another

0:18:53.680 --> 0:18:57.440
<v Speaker 2>shout out, I mean I would I'd really send people

0:18:57.480 --> 0:19:03.000
<v Speaker 2>to the writing of Astra Taylor and Leah Hunt Hendrix

0:19:03.000 --> 0:19:05.720
<v Speaker 2>and or you know, they add on solidarity that is

0:19:05.800 --> 0:19:09.679
<v Speaker 2>really a beautiful exploration of what it means and should

0:19:09.720 --> 0:19:11.920
<v Speaker 2>mean and can mean for us right now.

0:19:12.480 --> 0:19:17.400
<v Speaker 3>What you mentioned there about the kind of authentic, real solidarity,

0:19:17.520 --> 0:19:21.520
<v Speaker 3>the human connection, the person to person engagement, the thing

0:19:21.560 --> 0:19:24.560
<v Speaker 3>that keeps you going, the thing that will probably keep

0:19:24.880 --> 0:19:27.720
<v Speaker 3>the climate movement going, the thing that will keep humanity

0:19:27.760 --> 0:19:31.240
<v Speaker 3>going as it has thus far, is you know, being

0:19:31.280 --> 0:19:35.040
<v Speaker 3>with other people. That is that's definitely a theme in

0:19:35.080 --> 0:19:38.000
<v Speaker 3>the book. And you talk, you know, whether it's Camu

0:19:38.400 --> 0:19:41.480
<v Speaker 3>or Hannah or Rent or some of the others, there

0:19:41.520 --> 0:19:44.040
<v Speaker 3>is this idea that they come back to a lot

0:19:44.080 --> 0:19:47.919
<v Speaker 3>that you surface in your own book, which is, you know,

0:19:48.000 --> 0:19:50.879
<v Speaker 3>a real human being in front of you versus an

0:19:50.880 --> 0:19:55.879
<v Speaker 3>abstraction of the concept of humanity. You know, describing people,

0:19:56.119 --> 0:20:00.760
<v Speaker 3>let's say, as superfluous is sort of a key tenet

0:20:00.960 --> 0:20:05.359
<v Speaker 3>of a totalitarian state, totalitarian way of seeing the world.

0:20:05.720 --> 0:20:07.480
<v Speaker 3>Can you talk about that a little bit, you know,

0:20:07.520 --> 0:20:10.600
<v Speaker 3>to talitarianism as a way of understanding the climate crisis.

0:20:11.040 --> 0:20:13.119
<v Speaker 3>And I feel like we don't we hear a lot

0:20:13.160 --> 0:20:16.720
<v Speaker 3>about Hannah Rent and other philosophers these days for good reason, Yeah,

0:20:16.720 --> 0:20:18.480
<v Speaker 3>but we don't hear it in the context of climate

0:20:18.720 --> 0:20:20.000
<v Speaker 3>as much necessarily.

0:20:20.359 --> 0:20:24.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think this is a really central question. And

0:20:25.320 --> 0:20:27.840
<v Speaker 2>what kind of dawned on me is I was reading

0:20:28.240 --> 0:20:32.720
<v Speaker 2>The Origins of Totalitarianism. You know, it's great work that

0:20:33.119 --> 0:20:36.160
<v Speaker 2>she first published in the early fifties and then updated

0:20:36.200 --> 0:20:43.960
<v Speaker 2>in the later sixties. What is it that enables a system,

0:20:44.320 --> 0:20:53.920
<v Speaker 2>a political system to develop that essentially dehumanizes everyone who

0:20:54.119 --> 0:20:58.160
<v Speaker 2>is under its domination? And there, of course are historical.

0:20:58.240 --> 0:21:01.080
<v Speaker 2>I mean, we can go back well before the mid

0:21:01.119 --> 0:21:05.320
<v Speaker 2>twentieth century and look at the system of chattel slavery

0:21:05.600 --> 0:21:14.280
<v Speaker 2>or the global slave trade, or definitely colonialism, and which

0:21:14.359 --> 0:21:17.520
<v Speaker 2>closely related of course, And as I think it was

0:21:17.920 --> 0:21:22.840
<v Speaker 2>a mess Are who made the seminole argument that in

0:21:22.880 --> 0:21:27.280
<v Speaker 2>some ways totalitarianism and fascism and in Europe in the

0:21:27.280 --> 0:21:30.679
<v Speaker 2>twentieth century was sort of was colonialism coming home to

0:21:30.840 --> 0:21:35.959
<v Speaker 2>roost in Europe. But what struck me about that in

0:21:36.000 --> 0:21:40.400
<v Speaker 2>relation to the climate crisis. I was trying to somehow

0:21:40.480 --> 0:21:45.880
<v Speaker 2>come to grips with what kind of mindset enables someone

0:21:46.080 --> 0:21:52.560
<v Speaker 2>in a political system to pursue relentless expansion of fossil

0:21:52.600 --> 0:21:56.120
<v Speaker 2>fuels in the face of the science that we have.

0:21:56.720 --> 0:21:59.280
<v Speaker 2>And as we all know, the leaders of the fossil

0:21:59.280 --> 0:22:03.400
<v Speaker 2>fuel industry and the lobby and the politicians who are

0:22:03.440 --> 0:22:08.119
<v Speaker 2>all part of that, they know full well what they're doing.

0:22:08.240 --> 0:22:12.480
<v Speaker 2>They know full well what the climate science says, and.

0:22:12.760 --> 0:22:14.160
<v Speaker 4>Some of them knew before we did it.

0:22:14.200 --> 0:22:19.560
<v Speaker 2>Exactly Exxon has known for many decades. And what kind

0:22:19.600 --> 0:22:23.159
<v Speaker 2>of a mindset allows you to just keep the pedal

0:22:23.200 --> 0:22:28.320
<v Speaker 2>to the metal and accelerate into the abit off off

0:22:28.359 --> 0:22:29.040
<v Speaker 2>of the cliff.

0:22:29.680 --> 0:22:32.840
<v Speaker 4>Yeah they're not all sociopaths. There's a lot of them. Yeah, Yeah,

0:22:32.880 --> 0:22:33.679
<v Speaker 4>they're not all right.

0:22:33.760 --> 0:22:36.320
<v Speaker 2>And the answer is maybe just as simple as that.

0:22:36.480 --> 0:22:40.399
<v Speaker 2>It doesn't require theorizing, you know, the relationship between that

0:22:40.600 --> 0:22:44.879
<v Speaker 2>and totalitarianism. Okay, in some ways I am overthinking it, right,

0:22:46.200 --> 0:22:49.359
<v Speaker 2>but it helped me. It helped me because you know,

0:22:49.800 --> 0:22:55.240
<v Speaker 2>aren't you know? Analysis of the totalitarian mindset really helped me.

0:22:55.359 --> 0:22:57.760
<v Speaker 2>And it had to do with the kind of that

0:22:57.920 --> 0:23:04.800
<v Speaker 2>this belief in the limitless nature of power, okay, and

0:23:04.920 --> 0:23:09.960
<v Speaker 2>a kind of pursuit of power and domination that requires yes,

0:23:10.480 --> 0:23:14.680
<v Speaker 2>turning you know, entire populations of humanity and and you know,

0:23:14.800 --> 0:23:21.119
<v Speaker 2>really everyone under its sway, treating them as superfluous meaning

0:23:21.680 --> 0:23:26.040
<v Speaker 2>you know, not at all useful or relevant to the

0:23:26.160 --> 0:23:31.000
<v Speaker 2>ultimate end, which is, you know, complete domination. And if

0:23:31.040 --> 0:23:33.800
<v Speaker 2>you think about it, that is precisely what the fossil

0:23:34.400 --> 0:23:38.040
<v Speaker 2>capital regime really is pursuing. It is a form of

0:23:38.080 --> 0:23:42.639
<v Speaker 2>global domination, you know, it is it is subjecting the

0:23:42.840 --> 0:23:48.959
<v Speaker 2>entire human population to these catastrophic consequences and to the power,

0:23:49.119 --> 0:23:53.879
<v Speaker 2>the sheer economic and political power of this industry and

0:23:53.960 --> 0:23:58.000
<v Speaker 2>its political regime. Right. You know, I could probably do

0:23:58.119 --> 0:24:05.760
<v Speaker 2>a better job of articulating all. Read the book. Read

0:24:05.840 --> 0:24:07.480
<v Speaker 2>that chapter. It's the first chapter of.

0:24:07.560 --> 0:24:10.280
<v Speaker 3>The book, though it does pop up throughout the rest

0:24:10.280 --> 0:24:10.640
<v Speaker 3>of the book.

0:24:10.640 --> 0:24:12.200
<v Speaker 2>The y Yeah, yeah, I come back to it, of

0:24:12.280 --> 0:24:13.919
<v Speaker 2>course at the end. And maybe I don't know if

0:24:13.960 --> 0:24:16.320
<v Speaker 2>you were planning to ask me about this, but yeah,

0:24:16.400 --> 0:24:19.680
<v Speaker 2>let's go there. Yeah. The last chapter, which is a

0:24:19.800 --> 0:24:22.760
<v Speaker 2>new essay and it's the one long essay of the

0:24:22.800 --> 0:24:26.080
<v Speaker 2>book that's original to the book, is about fanol Franz Fanol,

0:24:26.440 --> 0:24:29.600
<v Speaker 2>who folks aren't familiar, is the author of the great

0:24:29.680 --> 0:24:34.400
<v Speaker 2>anti colonial revolutionary manifesto, The Wretched of the Earth right,

0:24:34.720 --> 0:24:38.320
<v Speaker 2>which came out in nineteen sixty one or two, and

0:24:38.560 --> 0:24:42.960
<v Speaker 2>he was deeply involved. He was a martiniquean French black

0:24:44.600 --> 0:24:52.240
<v Speaker 2>writer and psychiatrist who was educated in France and ended

0:24:52.320 --> 0:24:56.560
<v Speaker 2>up getting deeply involved in the Algerian War of Independence,

0:24:56.640 --> 0:25:01.800
<v Speaker 2>the Algerian revolution that threw off French French colonial rule.

0:25:02.560 --> 0:25:07.040
<v Speaker 2>I write about Phenoe in the context of Gaza and

0:25:08.080 --> 0:25:11.919
<v Speaker 2>the genocide that we're now seeing there. I was looking

0:25:12.040 --> 0:25:17.040
<v Speaker 2>to that because again I have this sense that the

0:25:17.160 --> 0:25:23.280
<v Speaker 2>climate struggle, climate justice struggle will never really be as

0:25:23.520 --> 0:25:27.640
<v Speaker 2>radical as it needs to be, as fearless and as

0:25:27.840 --> 0:25:31.359
<v Speaker 2>serious as it needs to be, until enough enough people

0:25:31.440 --> 0:25:35.960
<v Speaker 2>are desperate enough to really lay everything on the line.

0:25:36.080 --> 0:25:38.960
<v Speaker 3>Which is where spoiler alert, but this is not a

0:25:39.000 --> 0:25:43.119
<v Speaker 3>book that will be minimized by hearing. That is the

0:25:43.400 --> 0:25:45.000
<v Speaker 3>essentially where you conclude the book.

0:25:45.160 --> 0:25:49.800
<v Speaker 2>Right, exactly exactly. I'm reading Phanoe in the context of

0:25:50.000 --> 0:25:54.720
<v Speaker 2>both the Gaza genocide and the global climate catastrophe, which

0:25:54.760 --> 0:25:59.239
<v Speaker 2>is also, as I argue, a kind of genocide at

0:25:59.320 --> 0:26:04.760
<v Speaker 2>least for large portions of the global population. And so

0:26:05.040 --> 0:26:07.200
<v Speaker 2>so I write there at the very end of that chapter.

0:26:07.280 --> 0:26:11.520
<v Speaker 2>You know, as in the history of anti colonial liberation struggles,

0:26:11.680 --> 0:26:15.760
<v Speaker 2>the climate justice struggle, the fight for a habitable planet

0:26:16.320 --> 0:26:20.080
<v Speaker 2>and a livable human future in which justice is still possible,

0:26:20.840 --> 0:26:24.720
<v Speaker 2>will not be radical enough or fearless enough until enough

0:26:24.800 --> 0:26:29.320
<v Speaker 2>of us are desperate enough to risk everything. And then

0:26:29.440 --> 0:26:32.840
<v Speaker 2>the question, maybe the only question left at this hour,

0:26:33.000 --> 0:26:35.720
<v Speaker 2>is whether we will hold on to our humanity in

0:26:35.800 --> 0:26:40.680
<v Speaker 2>our desperation. I look at phenomen because he he is

0:26:41.920 --> 0:26:44.880
<v Speaker 2>in so many ways and has been ever all through

0:26:45.040 --> 0:26:48.880
<v Speaker 2>the you know, beginning in the in the that great

0:26:48.960 --> 0:26:53.960
<v Speaker 2>period of anti colonial independence movements in the sixties. Once

0:26:54.480 --> 0:26:57.040
<v Speaker 2>The Wretched of the Earth was published, he became this

0:26:57.520 --> 0:27:02.159
<v Speaker 2>icon of the anti colonial struggles, right and and this

0:27:02.440 --> 0:27:05.600
<v Speaker 2>voice and this you know, great prophet of and that

0:27:05.840 --> 0:27:09.840
<v Speaker 2>book famously opens up with this discussion of violence, of

0:27:10.840 --> 0:27:14.520
<v Speaker 2>anti colonial violence in particular, and he's been held up

0:27:14.600 --> 0:27:20.200
<v Speaker 2>as this kind of apostle of unlimited violence against against

0:27:20.240 --> 0:27:23.679
<v Speaker 2>the colonizer. And you know, as I've as I started

0:27:23.720 --> 0:27:27.600
<v Speaker 2>reading about phenol and then really closely reading the book,

0:27:28.240 --> 0:27:30.600
<v Speaker 2>it occurred to me that he and others have seen

0:27:30.640 --> 0:27:34.159
<v Speaker 2>this as well, not just is that he's actually not that,

0:27:35.160 --> 0:27:39.440
<v Speaker 2>you know, he always he always affirmed the right to

0:27:39.840 --> 0:27:44.080
<v Speaker 2>armed struggle, you know, armed anti anti colonial revolutionary struggle.

0:27:44.520 --> 0:27:48.320
<v Speaker 2>But he was not a proponent of of just unlimited

0:27:49.119 --> 0:27:53.680
<v Speaker 2>violence and especially against civilians. He was part of the

0:27:53.880 --> 0:27:56.439
<v Speaker 2>f l End of you know, the Front the Liberal

0:27:57.960 --> 0:28:04.040
<v Speaker 2>the Algerian revolutionary movement UH and and its tactics of

0:28:04.400 --> 0:28:10.000
<v Speaker 2>you know, indiscriminate violence against French settlers and you know,

0:28:10.080 --> 0:28:13.480
<v Speaker 2>civilians and against the French army armed forces was really

0:28:13.560 --> 0:28:20.280
<v Speaker 2>influential and including influential to the Palestinian liberation struggle. But

0:28:20.400 --> 0:28:23.359
<v Speaker 2>one of the things that Phenol goes right on to

0:28:23.480 --> 0:28:28.000
<v Speaker 2>say after that famous or infamous opening chapter is that

0:28:28.480 --> 0:28:34.040
<v Speaker 2>is that an unlimited violence, and you know, UH, an

0:28:34.119 --> 0:28:38.440
<v Speaker 2>indiscriminate violence can actually destroy a movement and can actually

0:28:40.360 --> 0:28:44.840
<v Speaker 2>just from a purely strategic standpoint, can be counterproductive. And

0:28:44.960 --> 0:28:46.520
<v Speaker 2>then he goes on by the end of the book

0:28:46.840 --> 0:28:50.400
<v Speaker 2>as a psychiatrist who treated patients you know, in Algeria

0:28:50.640 --> 0:28:54.040
<v Speaker 2>both and and in Tunisia where he he and other

0:28:54.200 --> 0:28:57.120
<v Speaker 2>f l IN leaders fled after the first couple of

0:28:57.200 --> 0:29:01.240
<v Speaker 2>years of the of the war. He did all sorts

0:29:01.240 --> 0:29:05.520
<v Speaker 2>of patients he treated, you know, Algerian independence fighters and

0:29:06.640 --> 0:29:10.920
<v Speaker 2>French civilians and French military and police who had been

0:29:11.000 --> 0:29:14.400
<v Speaker 2>involved in torture and in all kinds of atrocities against

0:29:14.480 --> 0:29:19.680
<v Speaker 2>the Algerian population and so on. And that final chapter

0:29:19.920 --> 0:29:23.920
<v Speaker 2>of The Wretched of the Earth is incredibly powerful and

0:29:24.080 --> 0:29:29.600
<v Speaker 2>eye opening in just the way PhNO somewhat subtly because

0:29:29.720 --> 0:29:32.360
<v Speaker 2>he wasn't going to just he wasn't going to just

0:29:32.560 --> 0:29:36.880
<v Speaker 2>you know, denounce the FLN's tactics. Don't and I don't

0:29:36.920 --> 0:29:39.680
<v Speaker 2>think that he ever would have, honestly, but he was

0:29:39.800 --> 0:29:43.080
<v Speaker 2>complicating the whole thing. He was showing the costs, the

0:29:44.400 --> 0:29:49.280
<v Speaker 2>very real, undeniable human costs of that kind of a war.

0:29:50.240 --> 0:29:54.880
<v Speaker 2>And what's very clear is that he's focusing on the

0:29:55.000 --> 0:29:59.840
<v Speaker 2>individual person, you know, the costs at that individual, individual,

0:30:00.080 --> 0:30:03.920
<v Speaker 2>personal level. And when you look at some of Phenon's

0:30:03.960 --> 0:30:07.680
<v Speaker 2>other writings, famously Black Skin, White Masks, which was his

0:30:07.880 --> 0:30:13.320
<v Speaker 2>first major book, which is still today valued for its

0:30:13.480 --> 0:30:19.440
<v Speaker 2>insights into race and colonialism, he did adhere to a

0:30:19.680 --> 0:30:23.360
<v Speaker 2>kind of universal humanism. That's what he wanted, you know.

0:30:24.280 --> 0:30:28.120
<v Speaker 2>I mean, even someone like Edward said, who you know,

0:30:28.640 --> 0:30:32.760
<v Speaker 2>you know, you won't find a better anti colonial theorist

0:30:32.840 --> 0:30:35.640
<v Speaker 2>than Edward said, you know, pointed out about Phenol that

0:30:35.760 --> 0:30:41.720
<v Speaker 2>he wanted a kind of humanism in which the colonized

0:30:41.880 --> 0:30:45.080
<v Speaker 2>and the colonizer, or the European and the Algerian or whoever,

0:30:45.680 --> 0:30:52.600
<v Speaker 2>were able to come together. That's pretty idealistic, right, I mean,

0:30:54.960 --> 0:30:58.720
<v Speaker 2>but it was worth it was really worth delving into.

0:30:59.040 --> 0:31:04.040
<v Speaker 2>And so there has been talk about a climate movement

0:31:05.360 --> 0:31:10.160
<v Speaker 2>that adopts a more Funonian approach, right as opposed to

0:31:10.440 --> 0:31:15.760
<v Speaker 2>a Gandhian approach. Famously in Andrea's Mom and his big blockbuster,

0:31:16.760 --> 0:31:20.680
<v Speaker 2>if there was ever an unlikely bestseller, it was his

0:31:20.800 --> 0:31:22.800
<v Speaker 2>book How to Blow Up a Pipeline.

0:31:22.440 --> 0:31:24.760
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, which you do discuss in an earlier chapter in

0:31:24.800 --> 0:31:25.080
<v Speaker 4>this book.

0:31:25.160 --> 0:31:27.240
<v Speaker 2>I discussed in the book a little bit, and I

0:31:27.360 --> 0:31:30.440
<v Speaker 2>interviewed Mom back in I think I was the first

0:31:31.080 --> 0:31:34.200
<v Speaker 2>American journalist to interview Mom about that book, right before

0:31:34.240 --> 0:31:38.520
<v Speaker 2>it came out back in December twenty twenty. He has

0:31:38.640 --> 0:31:41.000
<v Speaker 2>this much quoted line about, you know, we've had a

0:31:41.120 --> 0:31:44.240
<v Speaker 2>Gandhian climate movement. Maybe there will come a time, you know,

0:31:44.960 --> 0:31:48.320
<v Speaker 2>when we'll need a Fennonian, got it, you know, climate movement?

0:31:48.400 --> 0:31:51.240
<v Speaker 2>And I ask what that would really mean, and I think, like,

0:31:51.360 --> 0:31:58.080
<v Speaker 2>oddly enough, it doesn't necessarily mean a violent climate movement.

0:31:58.800 --> 0:32:01.600
<v Speaker 2>I mean, it probably mean means, And I personally have

0:32:02.000 --> 0:32:06.360
<v Speaker 2>come around to the conclusion that, yes, I accept the

0:32:06.480 --> 0:32:09.800
<v Speaker 2>idea that some sort of violence, some sort of even

0:32:10.440 --> 0:32:16.400
<v Speaker 2>armed struggle, might one day be justifiable, you know, it

0:32:16.480 --> 0:32:20.280
<v Speaker 2>might even now be justifiable in the in the case

0:32:20.480 --> 0:32:25.240
<v Speaker 2>of you know, climate catastrophe and climate injustice in some

0:32:25.360 --> 0:32:28.000
<v Speaker 2>ways because it is a form of colonialism, it is

0:32:28.080 --> 0:32:31.720
<v Speaker 2>a form of totalitarian you know, domination.

0:32:32.120 --> 0:32:34.440
<v Speaker 3>And to say that climate change itself is not a

0:32:34.560 --> 0:32:38.640
<v Speaker 3>violent undertaking, right, right, right to miss the obvious right.

0:32:38.680 --> 0:32:40.760
<v Speaker 2>But taking my cue there from Fanlane, and what I

0:32:40.880 --> 0:32:45.480
<v Speaker 2>learned about Phenol is that, like fhanone, you know, will

0:32:45.520 --> 0:32:48.760
<v Speaker 2>we be able to still hold on to our sense

0:32:48.800 --> 0:32:52.240
<v Speaker 2>of humanity, our sense of universal humanity and humanism in

0:32:52.720 --> 0:32:53.320
<v Speaker 2>that process?

0:32:54.000 --> 0:32:54.160
<v Speaker 1>Right?

0:32:54.920 --> 0:32:58.680
<v Speaker 2>But it does matter how we fight. It matters not

0:32:58.840 --> 0:33:02.160
<v Speaker 2>just strategically, but its on some deeper level.

0:33:02.560 --> 0:33:03.640
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, toward the.

0:33:03.680 --> 0:33:05.520
<v Speaker 3>End of the book, I'm going to quote you here

0:33:06.120 --> 0:33:09.840
<v Speaker 3>you say that anyone involved in left politics should be

0:33:09.880 --> 0:33:12.720
<v Speaker 3>asking themselves now just how far I'd be willing to

0:33:12.800 --> 0:33:15.440
<v Speaker 3>go as an activist in the struggle against the fossil

0:33:15.480 --> 0:33:19.440
<v Speaker 3>fuel industry and its political backers. And I'm wondering where

0:33:19.840 --> 0:33:21.760
<v Speaker 3>you can take this in whichever direction you'd like, but

0:33:22.040 --> 0:33:25.600
<v Speaker 3>where either where you come down on that personally, or

0:33:26.480 --> 0:33:29.720
<v Speaker 3>how you would encourage folks on the left to to

0:33:29.920 --> 0:33:31.000
<v Speaker 3>think about that question.

0:33:31.880 --> 0:33:34.640
<v Speaker 2>Well, I mean, first off, I would say that it's

0:33:34.680 --> 0:33:37.760
<v Speaker 2>going to be it's something that each person has to

0:33:39.120 --> 0:33:42.600
<v Speaker 2>answer for themselves, right. It's obviously it's not something that

0:33:44.120 --> 0:33:47.000
<v Speaker 2>I or anyone else has any right to prescribe for

0:33:47.080 --> 0:33:53.880
<v Speaker 2>anybody else, right. And that's one reason that these questions

0:33:54.040 --> 0:33:57.560
<v Speaker 2>and this topic is always personal. But I think the

0:33:57.640 --> 0:34:00.520
<v Speaker 2>reason we need to be asking ourselves that question is

0:34:00.680 --> 0:34:05.680
<v Speaker 2>that I feel strongly that we're going to need, and

0:34:05.760 --> 0:34:07.680
<v Speaker 2>we need right now and have needed for a while,

0:34:08.920 --> 0:34:13.200
<v Speaker 2>a kind of movement that is willing to take big risks,

0:34:14.080 --> 0:34:17.720
<v Speaker 2>and that requires individuals who are willing to take big risks.

0:34:18.200 --> 0:34:22.239
<v Speaker 2>You know, it doesn't mean, by any means that everybody

0:34:22.719 --> 0:34:25.360
<v Speaker 2>in the movement, any everybody needs to be willing to

0:34:25.440 --> 0:34:28.680
<v Speaker 2>take large, you know, huge personal risks that are like

0:34:28.760 --> 0:34:31.400
<v Speaker 2>our legal or physical risks, you know, not saying that

0:34:31.480 --> 0:34:35.520
<v Speaker 2>at all, but there is something to be said about

0:34:35.680 --> 0:34:40.200
<v Speaker 2>a kind of risk, aversion that has existed, you know,

0:34:40.480 --> 0:34:43.760
<v Speaker 2>in our politics and in our and in the certainly

0:34:43.800 --> 0:34:46.920
<v Speaker 2>the mainstream climate movement for a long time. You might

0:34:47.040 --> 0:34:49.560
<v Speaker 2>just say it's an aversion to political risk or whatever

0:34:50.960 --> 0:34:54.759
<v Speaker 2>and risks. Now, let's let's be clear, like the risk

0:34:55.400 --> 0:34:59.840
<v Speaker 2>level has gone way up since the inaugurate second and

0:35:00.000 --> 0:35:03.319
<v Speaker 2>auguration of Donald Trump and so, and these are real

0:35:03.520 --> 0:35:07.560
<v Speaker 2>and these are not evenly distributed, right, risk is not

0:35:07.760 --> 0:35:11.800
<v Speaker 2>evenly distributed by any sense of the imagination, right any stretch.

0:35:13.520 --> 0:35:16.200
<v Speaker 2>Someone like me, a white guy like me, you know,

0:35:16.400 --> 0:35:20.200
<v Speaker 2>my level of risk is considerably lower than a lot

0:35:20.239 --> 0:35:22.520
<v Speaker 2>of other people who I've worked with over the years,

0:35:22.600 --> 0:35:26.080
<v Speaker 2>and you know, done actions with and worked side by

0:35:26.120 --> 0:35:29.359
<v Speaker 2>side within the climate movement, and certainly right now when

0:35:29.360 --> 0:35:32.319
<v Speaker 2>you look at the kind of action that's being taken

0:35:32.400 --> 0:35:37.919
<v Speaker 2>to protect communities in la for example, from mass deportations

0:35:37.960 --> 0:35:41.040
<v Speaker 2>from ice and we're talking about people taking real risks.

0:35:41.360 --> 0:35:45.320
<v Speaker 2>But the point is, the point is when people are desperate,

0:35:45.400 --> 0:35:49.239
<v Speaker 2>when people are oppressed, when people are we can look

0:35:49.320 --> 0:35:55.600
<v Speaker 2>to the history of of of movements by oppressed peoples

0:35:55.840 --> 0:36:01.239
<v Speaker 2>for inspiration and for examples of of movements that have

0:36:01.320 --> 0:36:04.960
<v Speaker 2>been willing to take enormous risks, right, and I think

0:36:05.040 --> 0:36:08.480
<v Speaker 2>that it's important to recognize that we're in that we're

0:36:08.520 --> 0:36:11.359
<v Speaker 2>in that position now. You know, again the risk isn't

0:36:11.400 --> 0:36:14.880
<v Speaker 2>evenly distributed, but even even someone like me or you

0:36:15.719 --> 0:36:23.200
<v Speaker 2>is facing a level of threat and let's say it oppression. Uh,

0:36:23.480 --> 0:36:26.840
<v Speaker 2>that's that's, you know, something we've never never faced before,

0:36:27.080 --> 0:36:29.200
<v Speaker 2>you know, whether it's just climate change, or whether it's

0:36:29.239 --> 0:36:33.040
<v Speaker 2>the political situation, whether it's fascism. That said, I'm I'm

0:36:33.080 --> 0:36:36.200
<v Speaker 2>in I'm in favor of a kind of movement that

0:36:36.440 --> 0:36:40.719
<v Speaker 2>is willing to break things, that is willing to you know,

0:36:42.080 --> 0:36:46.520
<v Speaker 2>within within reason and without trying to harm other people.

0:36:47.600 --> 0:36:51.360
<v Speaker 2>You know, is is willing to to go out and

0:36:52.840 --> 0:36:57.600
<v Speaker 2>create a crisis, create in some ways create chaos, uh,

0:36:57.880 --> 0:37:02.560
<v Speaker 2>for the fossil fuel industry, and force a kind of

0:37:03.239 --> 0:37:06.680
<v Speaker 2>crisis on them that they've never had to really face before.

0:37:07.360 --> 0:37:09.600
<v Speaker 2>And Indale's all sorts of risks, you know. I talked

0:37:09.640 --> 0:37:12.520
<v Speaker 2>about this with Andrea's mom. You know, it's like, of course,

0:37:12.600 --> 0:37:18.480
<v Speaker 2>everything from political blowback to security state repression, you know,

0:37:19.360 --> 0:37:24.120
<v Speaker 2>are our increasing fascist police state that we're facing. But

0:37:24.200 --> 0:37:26.240
<v Speaker 2>we got to ask ourselves, at what, at what point

0:37:26.520 --> 0:37:30.839
<v Speaker 2>you know, does this become unavoidable? Right, what point does

0:37:30.920 --> 0:37:34.400
<v Speaker 2>it become unavoidable? You know, I've worked in spaces and

0:37:35.040 --> 0:37:39.239
<v Speaker 2>and I've worked on direct action campaigns where these kind

0:37:39.320 --> 0:37:43.719
<v Speaker 2>of risks were taken very seriously. I haven't I haven't

0:37:43.760 --> 0:37:48.560
<v Speaker 2>ever sabotaged anything. But but okay, something else to say

0:37:48.600 --> 0:37:53.040
<v Speaker 2>on that is that I think it's really important I

0:37:53.080 --> 0:37:54.799
<v Speaker 2>say this in that in that same chapter you were

0:37:54.840 --> 0:37:58.080
<v Speaker 2>just quoting from really important to acknowledge that going out

0:37:58.200 --> 0:38:02.040
<v Speaker 2>and committing some kind of quote unquote revolutionary act, right,

0:38:02.200 --> 0:38:07.960
<v Speaker 2>like blowing up a pipeline or whatever, that in itself

0:38:08.400 --> 0:38:12.719
<v Speaker 2>does not make a revolutionary movement or a revolutionary politics.

0:38:13.640 --> 0:38:19.160
<v Speaker 2>So so called revolutionary tactics do not make a revolutionary

0:38:19.200 --> 0:38:24.360
<v Speaker 2>politics all by themselves. Only movements can do that, right. So,

0:38:25.760 --> 0:38:28.760
<v Speaker 2>for me personally, in order for that kind of radical

0:38:28.880 --> 0:38:32.640
<v Speaker 2>action to really make sense, it would have to be

0:38:32.920 --> 0:38:39.319
<v Speaker 2>first of all, very carefully considered as strategic. It would

0:38:39.320 --> 0:38:43.279
<v Speaker 2>have to be sustained, you know, not just one offs, right,

0:38:44.520 --> 0:38:47.960
<v Speaker 2>and it would need to have the support the backing

0:38:48.840 --> 0:38:52.600
<v Speaker 2>of Now, obviously that backing may not be public, it

0:38:52.719 --> 0:38:56.040
<v Speaker 2>may not be explicit over you know, but it would

0:38:56.120 --> 0:39:00.680
<v Speaker 2>have the backing of a movement, right of a of

0:39:00.760 --> 0:39:07.080
<v Speaker 2>a large movement, and those conditions do not currently exist.

0:39:08.080 --> 0:39:10.560
<v Speaker 2>So I don't think it would necessarily make any sense

0:39:10.600 --> 0:39:14.719
<v Speaker 2>to go out and sabotage a pipeline or whatever at

0:39:14.760 --> 0:39:18.080
<v Speaker 2>this moment, because I don't think those It might be

0:39:18.239 --> 0:39:20.919
<v Speaker 2>just a waste of effort and a waste of a life,

0:39:21.160 --> 0:39:24.839
<v Speaker 2>you know, being sent to prison. But then again, if we're,

0:39:25.120 --> 0:39:30.439
<v Speaker 2>if we're collectively working toward that kind of you know, explicitly,

0:39:30.680 --> 0:39:33.279
<v Speaker 2>that kind of of a strategy, that kind of a goal,

0:39:33.360 --> 0:39:37.400
<v Speaker 2>I think those conditions certainly could exist, and maybe sooner

0:39:37.520 --> 0:39:39.360
<v Speaker 2>rather than later. You know, I think there are a

0:39:39.400 --> 0:39:43.520
<v Speaker 2>lot of people in this country and internationally who are

0:39:43.560 --> 0:39:46.040
<v Speaker 2>getting who are getting to this point. I think those

0:39:46.120 --> 0:39:47.360
<v Speaker 2>copies are really important.

0:39:48.040 --> 0:39:51.239
<v Speaker 3>The fact that that movement does not exist right now

0:39:51.680 --> 0:39:54.080
<v Speaker 3>gets at something that you talk about in the book,

0:39:54.120 --> 0:39:57.080
<v Speaker 3>which is and I'm curious if I'm fraving this in

0:39:57.120 --> 0:39:59.680
<v Speaker 3>the way that you'd say is accurate the climate movement

0:39:59.760 --> 0:40:03.640
<v Speaker 3>more broadly, which has never been one monolithic entity. Yes,

0:40:03.719 --> 0:40:06.040
<v Speaker 3>but it does come in for some criticism I think

0:40:06.160 --> 0:40:10.080
<v Speaker 3>deservedly so in the book, as I think you're arguing

0:40:10.600 --> 0:40:14.359
<v Speaker 3>not appreciating the extent to which more radical and revolutionary

0:40:14.440 --> 0:40:17.719
<v Speaker 3>thinking is probably required if we're to make any sort

0:40:17.760 --> 0:40:20.160
<v Speaker 3>of substantive political change. Is that a fair way to

0:40:20.520 --> 0:40:21.040
<v Speaker 3>summarize it.

0:40:21.200 --> 0:40:25.920
<v Speaker 2>Yes, Yes, it's not to say that that there isn't

0:40:26.800 --> 0:40:30.719
<v Speaker 2>a role for the mainstream. That's not to say that

0:40:30.840 --> 0:40:34.560
<v Speaker 2>at all. I'd be crazy if I thought that the

0:40:34.760 --> 0:40:37.880
<v Speaker 2>entire movement was gonna was going to become as radical

0:40:37.920 --> 0:40:43.440
<v Speaker 2>as I'm talking about. But it's something well known in

0:40:43.800 --> 0:40:50.200
<v Speaker 2>social movement theorizing and study history, which is the radical flank. Now,

0:40:50.440 --> 0:40:52.960
<v Speaker 2>the climate movement has had a radical flank for a

0:40:53.040 --> 0:40:56.200
<v Speaker 2>long time, ever since, certainly even you know, certainly even

0:40:56.280 --> 0:40:59.640
<v Speaker 2>before I got into it back in like twenty eleven

0:41:00.080 --> 0:41:02.680
<v Speaker 2>or so, and I reported on on and wrote about

0:41:02.680 --> 0:41:04.560
<v Speaker 2>a lot of the some of the people who were

0:41:04.800 --> 0:41:07.000
<v Speaker 2>very much part of that radical flank back in the

0:41:07.400 --> 0:41:09.960
<v Speaker 2>earlier years of the movement, sort of around the Keystone

0:41:10.160 --> 0:41:14.759
<v Speaker 2>fight and so on. There's the radical flank effect, you know,

0:41:15.640 --> 0:41:17.960
<v Speaker 2>has been seen many times in history, and it opens

0:41:18.120 --> 0:41:22.680
<v Speaker 2>up space, you know, political space for the main The

0:41:22.760 --> 0:41:25.160
<v Speaker 2>more you know, mainstream part of the movement, the sort

0:41:25.200 --> 0:41:29.800
<v Speaker 2>of political inside game to work, it can and it

0:41:29.880 --> 0:41:32.239
<v Speaker 2>can also kind of shake things up and break up,

0:41:32.320 --> 0:41:36.399
<v Speaker 2>break up a situation that's become kind of ossified, right,

0:41:37.520 --> 0:41:41.640
<v Speaker 2>so it can create new dynamics that you know didn't

0:41:41.680 --> 0:41:47.000
<v Speaker 2>exist before. This might be a good place in the

0:41:47.080 --> 0:41:49.880
<v Speaker 2>conversation for me to I first wrote it back in

0:41:49.960 --> 0:41:54.239
<v Speaker 2>twenty nineteen, kind of the peak of or almost the

0:41:54.320 --> 0:41:59.800
<v Speaker 2>peak of Green New Deal advocacy and the building of

0:41:59.840 --> 0:42:02.640
<v Speaker 2>the Green New Deal Coalition, which, by the way, as

0:42:02.680 --> 0:42:06.040
<v Speaker 2>critical as I may be at times, you know, that

0:42:06.280 --> 0:42:08.200
<v Speaker 2>was the most hopeful thing that I had ever seen.

0:42:08.320 --> 0:42:10.759
<v Speaker 2>And I still think, you know, we need to be

0:42:10.880 --> 0:42:13.920
<v Speaker 2>looking back to that period of like twenty eighteen to

0:42:14.000 --> 0:42:18.240
<v Speaker 2>twenty twenty, when the Green New Deal Coalition was coming together.

0:42:19.000 --> 0:42:20.360
<v Speaker 3>We probably don't have time to get into this, but

0:42:20.600 --> 0:42:24.040
<v Speaker 3>I would say it's not conspiratorial to say that the

0:42:24.560 --> 0:42:29.120
<v Speaker 3>explosion of quote unquote moderate center and corporate climate commitments

0:42:29.320 --> 0:42:33.560
<v Speaker 3>in twenty eighteen, twenty nineteen, twenty twenty was certainly not

0:42:33.760 --> 0:42:37.600
<v Speaker 3>unrelated to the immense popularity of the Green New Deal, Yes,

0:42:37.760 --> 0:42:40.400
<v Speaker 3>which was far more threatening to them than posting a

0:42:40.520 --> 0:42:42.000
<v Speaker 3>green pdf on their website.

0:42:42.200 --> 0:42:45.279
<v Speaker 2>Yes. And I'll go further, and I'll say, look, we

0:42:45.440 --> 0:42:52.359
<v Speaker 2>had the Green New Deal concept and policies even were

0:42:52.440 --> 0:42:57.080
<v Speaker 2>central to Bernie Sanders' twenty twenty campaign definitely moved Biden

0:42:57.400 --> 0:43:01.240
<v Speaker 2>well to the left on climate. Build Back Better wouldn't

0:43:01.320 --> 0:43:05.560
<v Speaker 2>have existed without the Sanders campaign and the Green New

0:43:05.600 --> 0:43:08.680
<v Speaker 2>Deal being at the center of that, right, That's why

0:43:08.719 --> 0:43:12.279
<v Speaker 2>we had people like Varshny Prakasha, the Sunrise Movement and

0:43:12.920 --> 0:43:15.279
<v Speaker 2>sitting you know, being as part of the Sanders team

0:43:15.360 --> 0:43:17.719
<v Speaker 2>that sat down with the Biden team and hashed out

0:43:18.239 --> 0:43:21.040
<v Speaker 2>what became Build Back Better. Right now, of course that

0:43:21.280 --> 0:43:25.799
<v Speaker 2>was all eviscerated and became the Inflation Reduction Act, which,

0:43:25.920 --> 0:43:28.680
<v Speaker 2>as useful as it has been for spurring you know,

0:43:29.760 --> 0:43:36.480
<v Speaker 2>clean energy development in this country, obviously was not anything

0:43:36.640 --> 0:43:40.799
<v Speaker 2>like a Green New Deal, even though of course it's

0:43:40.920 --> 0:43:43.440
<v Speaker 2>labeled that by everyone on the right, you know, but

0:43:43.960 --> 0:43:44.800
<v Speaker 2>that's a whole other.

0:43:44.880 --> 0:43:48.160
<v Speaker 4>Topic, right right, Yeah, I've distracted us there and the fact.

0:43:48.000 --> 0:43:51.480
<v Speaker 2>That it's now being completely dismantled, and yeah, but I

0:43:51.520 --> 0:43:53.520
<v Speaker 2>think this would be a good place for me to

0:43:53.640 --> 0:43:57.680
<v Speaker 2>inject this idea, which is when we talk about the

0:43:57.760 --> 0:44:01.040
<v Speaker 2>climate movement, the climate justice move movement, or what we

0:44:01.280 --> 0:44:04.279
<v Speaker 2>often call nowadays the climate left. You know, it's a

0:44:04.360 --> 0:44:06.359
<v Speaker 2>term that's a term that I think also was kind

0:44:06.400 --> 0:44:09.520
<v Speaker 2>of born out of the Green New Deal coalition, you know,

0:44:09.960 --> 0:44:12.600
<v Speaker 2>which was bringing labor in and was bringing a lot

0:44:12.640 --> 0:44:15.400
<v Speaker 2>of people who hadn't traditionally been part of the climate

0:44:15.520 --> 0:44:19.640
<v Speaker 2>movement into the conversation into the organizing. Right. So when

0:44:19.680 --> 0:44:21.880
<v Speaker 2>we think about the climate justice movement or the climate

0:44:22.000 --> 0:44:26.080
<v Speaker 2>left and its relationship to the broader left, okay, I

0:44:26.160 --> 0:44:29.879
<v Speaker 2>think is crucial. I've felt for quite a while now

0:44:30.000 --> 0:44:34.719
<v Speaker 2>that the time for a mere climate movement or even

0:44:34.800 --> 0:44:38.799
<v Speaker 2>climate justice movement has passed. That I think it had

0:44:38.920 --> 0:44:44.160
<v Speaker 2>passed even by twenty nineteen, okay. And what I mean

0:44:44.239 --> 0:44:48.840
<v Speaker 2>by that is it's clear that a climate movement, or

0:44:49.600 --> 0:44:52.399
<v Speaker 2>even what we call nowadays the climate left, is never

0:44:52.480 --> 0:44:57.000
<v Speaker 2>going to build enough just sheer political power on its

0:44:57.080 --> 0:45:04.640
<v Speaker 2>own to literally overthrow the fossil capital regime. Right. And

0:45:04.719 --> 0:45:07.640
<v Speaker 2>I think of something that Olaf M. E. Taiwa wrote

0:45:07.760 --> 0:45:12.440
<v Speaker 2>last year in a really good piece in Boston Review.

0:45:13.400 --> 0:45:17.719
<v Speaker 2>He made it so explicit where he said something like,

0:45:18.680 --> 0:45:22.879
<v Speaker 2>you know, the strategic imperative is that the strategy has

0:45:23.000 --> 0:45:28.880
<v Speaker 2>to be the complete defeat, the utter defeat of the

0:45:29.000 --> 0:45:34.160
<v Speaker 2>combined interests of oil, gas and coal producers, right in

0:45:34.360 --> 0:45:38.279
<v Speaker 2>order for any of our climate justice goals to be

0:45:39.040 --> 0:45:42.759
<v Speaker 2>even a remote possibility. I think it's pretty clear that

0:45:43.320 --> 0:45:48.800
<v Speaker 2>no individual, kind of siloed social movement on the left

0:45:49.640 --> 0:45:52.200
<v Speaker 2>is going to build the kind of power required to

0:45:52.320 --> 0:45:56.200
<v Speaker 2>do that. So what we need, and I think what

0:45:56.320 --> 0:45:59.240
<v Speaker 2>we've always needed, is not so much a climate movement

0:45:59.360 --> 0:46:03.600
<v Speaker 2>or a climate left as an actual left, you know,

0:46:04.000 --> 0:46:11.759
<v Speaker 2>like a resurgent revolutionary left, you know, and revolutionary can

0:46:11.840 --> 0:46:14.160
<v Speaker 2>mean all sorts of things, right, But I'm mainly talking

0:46:14.200 --> 0:46:18.239
<v Speaker 2>here about political revolution, you know, maybe something a little

0:46:18.360 --> 0:46:23.560
<v Speaker 2>more sweeping and transformational than you know Bernie was talking

0:46:23.600 --> 0:46:26.480
<v Speaker 2>about in twenty sixteen and twenty twenty where he popularized

0:46:26.640 --> 0:46:30.600
<v Speaker 2>the phrase political revolution. Right. But what we're talking about

0:46:30.680 --> 0:46:34.760
<v Speaker 2>is a left, a movement of movements, a popular front,

0:46:34.880 --> 0:46:38.000
<v Speaker 2>if you want to call it that that has both

0:46:38.120 --> 0:46:44.400
<v Speaker 2>climate survival okay, so meaning deep decarbonization and economic and

0:46:44.520 --> 0:46:47.840
<v Speaker 2>social justice right at its core. Right, And that was

0:46:47.920 --> 0:46:49.759
<v Speaker 2>the idea of the Greed and is the idea of

0:46:49.800 --> 0:46:52.640
<v Speaker 2>the Green New Deal coalition, right, But it needs to

0:46:52.719 --> 0:47:00.600
<v Speaker 2>be expressly revolutionary or transformative in its goals. It's political goals,

0:47:01.400 --> 0:47:05.320
<v Speaker 2>and that isn't going to happen with any one individual

0:47:06.000 --> 0:47:08.839
<v Speaker 2>movement on the left, it will take the entire life

0:47:08.920 --> 0:47:13.160
<v Speaker 2>and then some coalition building will will mean including the

0:47:13.280 --> 0:47:17.040
<v Speaker 2>center left in that. That's not something that's really on

0:47:17.160 --> 0:47:22.160
<v Speaker 2>the table right now, which could be, which is another

0:47:22.280 --> 0:47:27.520
<v Speaker 2>reason for you know, despair, right, because we need that,

0:47:27.640 --> 0:47:30.080
<v Speaker 2>We needed this yesterday, we needed this ten years ago.

0:47:30.560 --> 0:47:33.719
<v Speaker 2>But you know, I think that there's a lot of

0:47:34.000 --> 0:47:39.640
<v Speaker 2>self blame, self recrimination in a way in the climate movement,

0:47:39.719 --> 0:47:43.360
<v Speaker 2>a lot of you know, this feeling that we have failed.

0:47:44.320 --> 0:47:48.400
<v Speaker 2>But I'm not really sure why we've put that entire

0:47:48.760 --> 0:47:53.480
<v Speaker 2>like world saving burden on ourselves as climate activists. You know,

0:47:54.160 --> 0:47:57.759
<v Speaker 2>it's not like climate activists can do this on our own, right,

0:47:58.320 --> 0:48:00.239
<v Speaker 2>you know, it's not just a climate.

0:48:00.120 --> 0:48:03.239
<v Speaker 3>To overthrow the most powerful industry in the history of humanity.

0:48:03.440 --> 0:48:06.000
<v Speaker 2>Right, It's not like the climate movement it so alone

0:48:06.080 --> 0:48:09.560
<v Speaker 2>has failed. It's like the entire progressive left has failed. Okay,

0:48:09.760 --> 0:48:14.000
<v Speaker 2>Like the left should have prioritized climate and climate justice

0:48:14.080 --> 0:48:16.520
<v Speaker 2>decades ago. Right. There are all sorts of reasons why

0:48:16.560 --> 0:48:18.600
<v Speaker 2>it didn't, and some of that is the blame of

0:48:18.719 --> 0:48:22.800
<v Speaker 2>climate activists and the environmental movement for sure, Right, But

0:48:23.000 --> 0:48:25.640
<v Speaker 2>at some point you got to ask yourself, like Why

0:48:26.000 --> 0:48:28.760
<v Speaker 2>wasn't there something like a Green New Deal coalition bringing

0:48:28.880 --> 0:48:31.520
<v Speaker 2>labor and racial and social justice into the you know,

0:48:32.080 --> 0:48:35.759
<v Speaker 2>one big movement. Why wasn't there that twenty years ago?

0:48:36.160 --> 0:48:38.520
<v Speaker 2>Because it was clear years ago what we were facing.

0:48:39.120 --> 0:48:42.280
<v Speaker 3>I found it righteous and clarifying the way you phrase

0:48:42.280 --> 0:48:45.319
<v Speaker 3>it in that twenty nineteen essay about the Green New Deal.

0:48:45.800 --> 0:48:50.840
<v Speaker 3>I think everyone from essentially the center right on leftward

0:48:50.920 --> 0:48:56.520
<v Speaker 3>at this point would not consider themselves ourselves as climate deniers.

0:48:57.040 --> 0:48:59.719
<v Speaker 3>But you describe in that essay any as you put it,

0:48:59.760 --> 0:49:02.600
<v Speaker 3>any thing less than revolutionary political change is essentially a

0:49:02.719 --> 0:49:05.840
<v Speaker 3>new type of climate denial. Maybe this gets back to

0:49:05.880 --> 0:49:07.680
<v Speaker 3>what we were talking about a little bit before, where

0:49:07.880 --> 0:49:11.520
<v Speaker 3>despair is a reflection of being honest. It seems like,

0:49:12.239 --> 0:49:15.000
<v Speaker 3>again not just the climate movement, but the center and

0:49:15.120 --> 0:49:18.759
<v Speaker 3>the left more broadly, we have engaged in what, in

0:49:18.840 --> 0:49:21.920
<v Speaker 3>hindsight seems like at least a decade of this new

0:49:22.080 --> 0:49:28.200
<v Speaker 3>climate denial, of thinking, reassuring ourselves that piecemeal, incremental, market driven,

0:49:28.640 --> 0:49:33.160
<v Speaker 3>technocratic tweaks to the way things are can solve this problem.

0:49:34.080 --> 0:49:37.440
<v Speaker 3>Whatever solve means, whatever solve. But yeah, can you talk

0:49:37.480 --> 0:49:39.520
<v Speaker 3>about what that? I guess why you think of this

0:49:39.600 --> 0:49:41.480
<v Speaker 3>as a new form of climate denial.

0:49:41.719 --> 0:49:43.800
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I don't mean to say that it's obviously,

0:49:43.880 --> 0:49:46.440
<v Speaker 2>as you were getting out there, it's not denial of

0:49:46.520 --> 0:49:51.840
<v Speaker 2>climate science, although it's denial of what climate science tells

0:49:51.920 --> 0:49:56.440
<v Speaker 2>us is really necessary at the political and economic level, right,

0:49:56.520 --> 0:49:58.799
<v Speaker 2>I mean, climate sciences has been quite clear. I mean,

0:49:58.840 --> 0:50:02.320
<v Speaker 2>the IPCC itself came right out and said in twenty

0:50:02.360 --> 0:50:05.040
<v Speaker 2>eighteen that you know, to you know, in its famous

0:50:05.680 --> 0:50:10.320
<v Speaker 2>report on one point five degrees C and the difference

0:50:10.360 --> 0:50:12.600
<v Speaker 2>between that and two C and what would be required

0:50:13.120 --> 0:50:16.359
<v Speaker 2>to actually achieve one c one point five C, which

0:50:16.440 --> 0:50:19.319
<v Speaker 2>is now pretty much the game. That game is up.

0:50:19.480 --> 0:50:23.560
<v Speaker 2>I mean, we're already passing it, but they've made it

0:50:23.719 --> 0:50:27.680
<v Speaker 2>very clear that it was going to require unprecedented transformative

0:50:27.760 --> 0:50:31.000
<v Speaker 2>change at the political and economic level. So what I'm

0:50:31.040 --> 0:50:35.800
<v Speaker 2>talking about, though, is a kind of political denialism, you know,

0:50:36.560 --> 0:50:39.840
<v Speaker 2>or maybe call it just wishful thinking, Okay, might be

0:50:40.320 --> 0:50:46.160
<v Speaker 2>kinder way to put it. It's inconceivable that our current

0:50:46.560 --> 0:50:50.800
<v Speaker 2>two party system are current the Democratic Party that we

0:50:50.920 --> 0:50:56.440
<v Speaker 2>have today as the only opposition to MAGA and the

0:50:56.560 --> 0:51:00.760
<v Speaker 2>right and the full control of the false fuel industry

0:51:00.880 --> 0:51:03.040
<v Speaker 2>over our politics at this point.

0:51:03.280 --> 0:51:07.239
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, speaking of reasons for despair, Yeah, it's the Democratic

0:51:07.320 --> 0:51:10.880
<v Speaker 3>Party taking on Trump and magazine exactly.

0:51:11.000 --> 0:51:15.200
<v Speaker 2>It's inconceivable that the current current iteration of the Democratic Party,

0:51:15.760 --> 0:51:18.840
<v Speaker 2>you know, is capable of what we're talking about. And

0:51:19.040 --> 0:51:22.680
<v Speaker 2>so clearly there has to be at the very least

0:51:24.200 --> 0:51:27.719
<v Speaker 2>a kind of political revolution within the Democratic Party, but

0:51:27.880 --> 0:51:30.680
<v Speaker 2>more likely, in order for that to even be a possibility,

0:51:30.800 --> 0:51:34.640
<v Speaker 2>there has to be a broad, broad, uh you know,

0:51:34.719 --> 0:51:38.879
<v Speaker 2>bottom up you know, mass uprising of some sort kind

0:51:38.960 --> 0:51:42.320
<v Speaker 2>of you know, truly mass movement that can force the

0:51:42.400 --> 0:51:46.600
<v Speaker 2>issue and that can really bring things to a halt, right,

0:51:46.760 --> 0:51:48.640
<v Speaker 2>And so there has been taught. One of the most

0:51:48.920 --> 0:51:53.680
<v Speaker 2>positive developments I think in recent years has been, uh,

0:51:55.280 --> 0:51:58.480
<v Speaker 2>maybe longer than just recent years, has been the call

0:51:58.600 --> 0:52:03.279
<v Speaker 2>from the UAW and you know Sean Fayne for kind

0:52:03.320 --> 0:52:10.080
<v Speaker 2>of synchronous strikes right in twenty twenty eight, and you know,

0:52:10.320 --> 0:52:14.240
<v Speaker 2>basically a general strike, the idea of a general strike,

0:52:14.360 --> 0:52:19.560
<v Speaker 2>I mean, that's the level of political uprising that we're

0:52:19.560 --> 0:52:23.120
<v Speaker 2>talking about. That's the kind of mass movement that we're

0:52:23.160 --> 0:52:25.840
<v Speaker 2>talking about, right It's got to be at that scale

0:52:26.120 --> 0:52:28.680
<v Speaker 2>and that level, and that isn't happening right away, and

0:52:29.239 --> 0:52:31.920
<v Speaker 2>it can't really happen. It can't just you know, you

0:52:32.040 --> 0:52:35.600
<v Speaker 2>don't just snap your fingers, and you know, a guy

0:52:35.680 --> 0:52:37.799
<v Speaker 2>like me doesn't just write an op ed piece saying

0:52:37.840 --> 0:52:45.279
<v Speaker 2>we need a political revolution, that something to just organically materialize. Right.

0:52:46.160 --> 0:52:48.920
<v Speaker 2>It's like, as Jane mcleavy, the great labor writer, late

0:52:49.080 --> 0:52:54.040
<v Speaker 2>great labor writer and organizer, always said, right, there are

0:52:54.080 --> 0:52:57.360
<v Speaker 2>no shortcuts, and she was referring specifically to, you know,

0:52:57.440 --> 0:53:00.840
<v Speaker 2>within labor organizing. But I think it's true broadly of

0:53:01.640 --> 0:53:06.080
<v Speaker 2>left you know, mass movement organizing. There's not really a

0:53:06.160 --> 0:53:09.359
<v Speaker 2>shortcut to this. Now. On the other hand, we are

0:53:09.760 --> 0:53:13.400
<v Speaker 2>not starting from scratch, right. There's been a lot of

0:53:13.480 --> 0:53:16.759
<v Speaker 2>movement building over the last decade, and I think we

0:53:16.920 --> 0:53:20.080
<v Speaker 2>can continue to build on that where we need to be,

0:53:20.200 --> 0:53:22.480
<v Speaker 2>and there are some real positive developments in that era,

0:53:22.640 --> 0:53:23.880
<v Speaker 2>you know, along those lines.

0:53:24.920 --> 0:53:26.719
<v Speaker 3>As we're talking, and as I was reading the book

0:53:26.760 --> 0:53:30.680
<v Speaker 3>and in general, as I'm following the trajectory of humanity

0:53:30.760 --> 0:53:33.600
<v Speaker 3>and the climate, I come back to what you write

0:53:33.600 --> 0:53:36.520
<v Speaker 3>about in the very last part of the book that

0:53:36.680 --> 0:53:39.239
<v Speaker 3>you were quoting earlier about and I don't actually, I

0:53:39.280 --> 0:53:42.480
<v Speaker 3>don't say this with a sense of fatalism, although it

0:53:42.600 --> 0:53:45.080
<v Speaker 3>might come off that way. It does feel like there

0:53:45.120 --> 0:53:47.759
<v Speaker 3>will come a point when, again paraphrasing you hear that

0:53:47.960 --> 0:53:52.480
<v Speaker 3>enough of us are desperate enough that something there will

0:53:52.560 --> 0:53:56.200
<v Speaker 3>be the conditions for such a movement to come together.

0:53:56.360 --> 0:53:58.520
<v Speaker 2>Yes, And I don't think that it will just be

0:53:58.920 --> 0:54:02.200
<v Speaker 2>climate that will cause that desperation. That was also kind

0:54:02.200 --> 0:54:04.239
<v Speaker 2>of what I'm getting at there, right, you know, I

0:54:04.320 --> 0:54:06.440
<v Speaker 2>wrote that in that piece in twenty nineteen. I was like,

0:54:06.480 --> 0:54:10.080
<v Speaker 2>the only thing worse than climate catastrophe is climate catastrophe

0:54:10.360 --> 0:54:14.600
<v Speaker 2>plus fascism, right, which I hate to say, is kind

0:54:14.640 --> 0:54:17.440
<v Speaker 2>of where we are, right. And that's been an idea

0:54:17.560 --> 0:54:20.399
<v Speaker 2>that has circulated for a long time. Right, We've known

0:54:20.560 --> 0:54:24.800
<v Speaker 2>for decades and people have warned that, you know, climate

0:54:24.880 --> 0:54:28.279
<v Speaker 2>change itself could very easily give rise to the kind

0:54:28.320 --> 0:54:32.279
<v Speaker 2>of you know, social situation, social breakdown that could lead

0:54:32.320 --> 0:54:36.600
<v Speaker 2>to fascism. And of course we've had forms, certainly fascistic

0:54:36.840 --> 0:54:42.960
<v Speaker 2>forms of control and governance, you know, in this country

0:54:43.000 --> 0:54:45.839
<v Speaker 2>and elsewhere for a long time. But I don't think

0:54:46.160 --> 0:54:50.920
<v Speaker 2>what you said there is fatalistic in the least. I

0:54:51.000 --> 0:54:54.680
<v Speaker 2>don't see it that way, because the whole premise right

0:54:54.880 --> 0:54:58.279
<v Speaker 2>is to fight on no one In my book, is

0:54:58.360 --> 0:55:01.359
<v Speaker 2>talking about folding up their tent going home, right, I mean,

0:55:02.640 --> 0:55:07.240
<v Speaker 2>all right, but it's it's it's being honest and facing

0:55:07.440 --> 0:55:10.000
<v Speaker 2>up to the conditions that we have and that we

0:55:10.080 --> 0:55:11.800
<v Speaker 2>are facing, and that what we are going to be

0:55:11.920 --> 0:55:15.359
<v Speaker 2>living into in the coming decades. And so those are

0:55:15.440 --> 0:55:19.880
<v Speaker 2>the conditions under which we're going to have to practice politics,

0:55:19.960 --> 0:55:22.400
<v Speaker 2>than which we're going to have to build movements, and

0:55:22.840 --> 0:55:25.040
<v Speaker 2>you know that we're going to have to fight, and

0:55:25.120 --> 0:55:27.480
<v Speaker 2>in some ways that's going to make our task far

0:55:27.600 --> 0:55:30.200
<v Speaker 2>more difficult, and you know, maybe in some ways it

0:55:30.320 --> 0:55:32.960
<v Speaker 2>might actually open up opportunities.

0:55:33.080 --> 0:55:35.960
<v Speaker 3>When we accept or come to terms with the fact

0:55:36.000 --> 0:55:39.279
<v Speaker 3>that the old rules don't really apply anymore. That does

0:55:39.480 --> 0:55:41.719
<v Speaker 3>I think there's a sense of freedom that can follow that,

0:55:42.200 --> 0:55:47.800
<v Speaker 3>right exactly, In writing these essays and reviewing them for

0:55:47.880 --> 0:55:51.840
<v Speaker 3>this book, did you personally get where you wanted to

0:55:51.880 --> 0:55:54.000
<v Speaker 3>get or where you needed to get, Whether that's a

0:55:54.080 --> 0:55:58.200
<v Speaker 3>sense of clarity or I guess piece of some kind,

0:55:58.960 --> 0:56:01.080
<v Speaker 3>did you get where you needed to get with this book?

0:56:01.120 --> 0:56:05.440
<v Speaker 2>Do you think personally? Yeah? I mean, man, that's a

0:56:05.520 --> 0:56:10.520
<v Speaker 2>tough question, because you know, you know, some days I

0:56:10.840 --> 0:56:15.360
<v Speaker 2>feel that way, in other days I don't. Yeah, I

0:56:15.440 --> 0:56:17.200
<v Speaker 2>guess it depends on when you.

0:56:17.320 --> 0:56:21.680
<v Speaker 4>Catch me right how about right now?

0:56:21.800 --> 0:56:25.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean I would say that right now I

0:56:25.200 --> 0:56:30.520
<v Speaker 2>feel about as as mentally healthy as I probably ever get,

0:56:31.960 --> 0:56:35.240
<v Speaker 2>which which isn't to say that I'm entirely mentally healthy.

0:56:36.120 --> 0:56:39.839
<v Speaker 2>You know. The despair is always there, you know. It's

0:56:39.920 --> 0:56:42.120
<v Speaker 2>like like I use this phrase in the book, and

0:56:42.360 --> 0:56:45.920
<v Speaker 2>I'm on the other side of despair, you know' I've

0:56:46.360 --> 0:56:49.440
<v Speaker 2>I've worked through it. And that doesn't mean it's just

0:56:49.520 --> 0:56:53.840
<v Speaker 2>gone away and everything is great, everything is fine. But

0:56:54.120 --> 0:56:56.080
<v Speaker 2>I'm learning, you know, I'm learning to live with it.

0:56:57.400 --> 0:56:59.719
<v Speaker 2>And again, I can't stress this enough. You know, the

0:57:00.080 --> 0:57:03.480
<v Speaker 2>the healthiest things I do, the healthiest things in my

0:57:03.640 --> 0:57:08.920
<v Speaker 2>life are being part of communities, Being part of communities

0:57:08.960 --> 0:57:13.439
<v Speaker 2>of people who are actually working together on this. Being

0:57:13.600 --> 0:57:20.200
<v Speaker 2>in isolation, being a self sufficient individual, you know, is

0:57:20.280 --> 0:57:20.800
<v Speaker 2>not the way.

0:57:22.120 --> 0:57:24.960
<v Speaker 3>It was interesting going back to what we were talking about,

0:57:25.320 --> 0:57:29.360
<v Speaker 3>focusing on the you know, the dignity of the individual

0:57:29.560 --> 0:57:35.320
<v Speaker 3>human being versus the abstraction the idea of humanity, and

0:57:35.560 --> 0:57:39.160
<v Speaker 3>thinking about that alongside this idea that we none of

0:57:39.240 --> 0:57:43.000
<v Speaker 3>us can do this alone. There's a way of seeing

0:57:43.080 --> 0:57:48.160
<v Speaker 3>people as individuals while also recognizing that the sort of

0:57:48.400 --> 0:57:53.920
<v Speaker 3>neoliberal individualistic approach to surviving in the twenty first century

0:57:54.360 --> 0:57:58.400
<v Speaker 3>is doomed to fail. And I found it interesting to

0:57:58.760 --> 0:58:01.960
<v Speaker 3>the way you talk about them getting all sorts of balloons.

0:58:02.000 --> 0:58:02.600
<v Speaker 4>Now thanks to.

0:58:02.680 --> 0:58:06.840
<v Speaker 3>Zoom Zoom really liked my point. But the way that

0:58:06.960 --> 0:58:09.920
<v Speaker 3>you talk about the individual and the way that the

0:58:10.320 --> 0:58:12.760
<v Speaker 3>you know, these philosophers and thinkers who you cite talked

0:58:12.800 --> 0:58:17.960
<v Speaker 3>about the individual. It's almost like reclaiming the individual, the idea,

0:58:18.200 --> 0:58:21.320
<v Speaker 3>the value, the dignity, and the individual from the way

0:58:21.400 --> 0:58:26.920
<v Speaker 3>it's been warped by the right, by the neoliberal you know, capitalists.

0:58:26.440 --> 0:58:29.080
<v Speaker 2>And to some extent by the left as well. Although

0:58:29.480 --> 0:58:31.720
<v Speaker 2>what I'll say there is I'm not I'm certainly not.

0:58:32.400 --> 0:58:37.160
<v Speaker 2>I am not a member of the anti woke liberal consensus.

0:58:37.400 --> 0:58:40.360
<v Speaker 2>You know, that's not me at all. But I do

0:58:40.720 --> 0:58:42.840
<v Speaker 2>think what I was trying to break down here is

0:58:42.920 --> 0:58:49.000
<v Speaker 2>this kind of simplistic binary that kind of opposes collectivism

0:58:49.080 --> 0:58:53.920
<v Speaker 2>and identity politics, you know, group based politics with individualism.

0:58:54.360 --> 0:58:57.040
<v Speaker 2>Like I think that it's never that simple. And most

0:58:57.120 --> 0:58:59.560
<v Speaker 2>of the people I know and have been in deep

0:58:59.680 --> 0:59:03.840
<v Speaker 2>conversation with in the climate justice movement, and you know,

0:59:05.000 --> 0:59:08.919
<v Speaker 2>people of all all identities, one thing that we seem

0:59:09.000 --> 0:59:11.640
<v Speaker 2>to agree on is that that that's fart, is that

0:59:11.720 --> 0:59:16.560
<v Speaker 2>that that's far too simplistic, That that that a healthy

0:59:16.600 --> 0:59:22.040
<v Speaker 2>community and a healthy movement values every individual right at

0:59:22.080 --> 0:59:25.680
<v Speaker 2>the same time, that we recognize difference, and that we

0:59:26.240 --> 0:59:33.720
<v Speaker 2>especially recognize differences of privilege and of you know, social oppression. Right. So,

0:59:33.960 --> 0:59:36.600
<v Speaker 2>so all that said, I guess what I'm trying to do,

0:59:36.920 --> 0:59:38.800
<v Speaker 2>or what I realized at some point, is that I wasn't.

0:59:38.880 --> 0:59:41.400
<v Speaker 2>I'm just not willing to give up, you know, a

0:59:41.520 --> 0:59:45.840
<v Speaker 2>sense of universal humanism, a sense of universal human solidarity, right, Like,

0:59:45.960 --> 0:59:48.200
<v Speaker 2>and I think it's important, you know, I'm looking back

0:59:48.240 --> 0:59:51.360
<v Speaker 2>to these writers who are part of the liberal humanist tradition.

0:59:51.800 --> 0:59:54.720
<v Speaker 2>I mean, look, Hannah Arendt and Albert Camu are not

0:59:54.840 --> 0:59:58.240
<v Speaker 2>necessarily authors thinkers that you'd expect to find in a

0:59:58.280 --> 1:00:02.520
<v Speaker 2>book published by Haymarket. Okay, the Market Books, a self

1:00:02.600 --> 1:00:06.600
<v Speaker 2>described radical left publisher, right, I mean, these are these

1:00:06.760 --> 1:00:10.160
<v Speaker 2>these folks are are liberal humanists, and they have a

1:00:10.240 --> 1:00:12.200
<v Speaker 2>lot to answer for. I mean, that tradition has a

1:00:12.240 --> 1:00:15.840
<v Speaker 2>lot to answer for, right, But I'm not willing to

1:00:16.000 --> 1:00:21.320
<v Speaker 2>throw out the humanist baby with the liberal bathwater, you know,

1:00:22.240 --> 1:00:27.200
<v Speaker 2>Like I'm not a liberal anymore. I'm I'm I'm far

1:00:27.360 --> 1:00:29.760
<v Speaker 2>I'm way too far left to be considered a liberal,

1:00:29.920 --> 1:00:33.960
<v Speaker 2>right right. But I do consider myself a universal humanist,

1:00:34.240 --> 1:00:36.560
<v Speaker 2>and I think it is possible there is such thing

1:00:36.680 --> 1:00:39.560
<v Speaker 2>as a as a radical left humanism.

1:00:40.320 --> 1:00:43.040
<v Speaker 3>There's a question you ask in the book, and I

1:00:43.120 --> 1:00:45.200
<v Speaker 3>wanted to pose it to you and see if you

1:00:45.640 --> 1:00:48.880
<v Speaker 3>you have come to an answer or some semblance of

1:00:48.880 --> 1:00:52.160
<v Speaker 3>an answer through this process. Okay, And you ask, what

1:00:52.360 --> 1:00:53.840
<v Speaker 3>does a life of radical.

1:00:53.520 --> 1:00:54.440
<v Speaker 4>Commitment look like?

1:00:55.640 --> 1:00:58.080
<v Speaker 3>And I'm wondering if you have if you have an

1:00:58.080 --> 1:01:01.560
<v Speaker 3>answer that I guess that's satisfied you for now, because

1:01:01.560 --> 1:01:04.400
<v Speaker 3>there's no way to answer it clearly and unequivocally right

1:01:04.560 --> 1:01:04.960
<v Speaker 3>right right.

1:01:05.000 --> 1:01:07.960
<v Speaker 2>And I, first of all, again right off the top,

1:01:08.000 --> 1:01:11.600
<v Speaker 2>I would say I wouldn't try to prescribe for anyone.

1:01:12.000 --> 1:01:14.200
<v Speaker 2>I'm not going to tell you, Adam like, what a

1:01:14.280 --> 1:01:18.720
<v Speaker 2>life of radical commitment must look like for you, all right.

1:01:19.760 --> 1:01:23.560
<v Speaker 3>Although I wouldn't mind some guidance. It would make the

1:01:24.240 --> 1:01:25.920
<v Speaker 3>you know, the figuring out of life.

1:01:26.040 --> 1:01:32.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, right, Well, there are kind of two operative

1:01:33.120 --> 1:01:37.360
<v Speaker 2>terms in that question, radical and commitment. The kind of

1:01:37.480 --> 1:01:40.280
<v Speaker 2>radicalism I'm talking about there is the kind that both

1:01:40.360 --> 1:01:44.080
<v Speaker 2>has a radical analysis, right. It's it's on that intellectual

1:01:44.240 --> 1:01:48.440
<v Speaker 2>level that sees the problem, you know, in a radical

1:01:48.520 --> 1:01:51.520
<v Speaker 2>sense of seeing going to the root of the problem,

1:01:52.840 --> 1:01:58.000
<v Speaker 2>which for me and many others increasingly is our capitalist

1:01:58.080 --> 1:02:01.920
<v Speaker 2>system and is our system of you know, are the

1:02:02.040 --> 1:02:06.280
<v Speaker 2>legacy of colonialism and slavery and all of that, which

1:02:06.320 --> 1:02:10.240
<v Speaker 2>are totally capitalism, and those are totally intertwined. But it

1:02:10.400 --> 1:02:15.960
<v Speaker 2>also refers to a kind of radicalism I don't want

1:02:16.000 --> 1:02:19.880
<v Speaker 2>to say merely of tactics, right, like the willingness to

1:02:19.920 --> 1:02:23.600
<v Speaker 2>go sabotage of pipeline or something, but kind of on

1:02:23.720 --> 1:02:27.880
<v Speaker 2>a personal level, that willingness to do the things that

1:02:28.360 --> 1:02:32.360
<v Speaker 2>others will find extreme to do and say, the things

1:02:32.840 --> 1:02:39.280
<v Speaker 2>that will be called extreme, called unreasonable, well outside the

1:02:39.400 --> 1:02:47.440
<v Speaker 2>Overton window, you know of polite discourse, polite and reasonable discourse.

1:02:48.600 --> 1:02:51.240
<v Speaker 2>And so I think, what does that look like? Well,

1:02:52.040 --> 1:02:54.880
<v Speaker 2>we can look at all sorts of examples from history, right,

1:02:55.000 --> 1:02:59.560
<v Speaker 2>I mean, the abolitionists were were the radicals of their time,

1:02:59.640 --> 1:03:04.280
<v Speaker 2>and we're considered dangerous and extreme, and you know, pretty

1:03:04.360 --> 1:03:08.960
<v Speaker 2>much in every successful social movement in American history alone,

1:03:09.600 --> 1:03:11.640
<v Speaker 2>you can look back and the people who led those

1:03:11.720 --> 1:03:14.840
<v Speaker 2>movements were the radicals of their time, and they were

1:03:15.440 --> 1:03:22.280
<v Speaker 2>considered extreme and they and they had that radical analysis too, right,

1:03:22.400 --> 1:03:26.920
<v Speaker 2>that's what was driving those movements. So yeah, Like for me,

1:03:27.760 --> 1:03:32.440
<v Speaker 2>the word commitment then is, let's say I reach a

1:03:32.520 --> 1:03:36.200
<v Speaker 2>point where I am I get it. I've kind of

1:03:36.280 --> 1:03:40.200
<v Speaker 2>reached that point intellectually and internally, you know, in terms

1:03:40.200 --> 1:03:43.240
<v Speaker 2>of my result to you know, take action or say

1:03:43.280 --> 1:03:46.200
<v Speaker 2>the things that need to be said. The commitment part,

1:03:46.320 --> 1:03:49.080
<v Speaker 2>I think has to do with the long haul, staying

1:03:49.160 --> 1:03:51.360
<v Speaker 2>in it, sticking with it for the long haul. That

1:03:51.520 --> 1:03:56.480
<v Speaker 2>really is what the book is all about. Right. Where

1:03:56.560 --> 1:03:58.760
<v Speaker 2>does that kind of commitment come from? I don't know.

1:03:59.360 --> 1:04:02.240
<v Speaker 2>I don't know. The best answer I have is that

1:04:02.360 --> 1:04:07.000
<v Speaker 2>it comes from my comrades, right, from that collective sense

1:04:07.080 --> 1:04:10.959
<v Speaker 2>of solidarity. Right. But that's in some ways too easy

1:04:11.040 --> 1:04:13.240
<v Speaker 2>an answer, you know. I think just each one of

1:04:13.360 --> 1:04:16.600
<v Speaker 2>us it's spiritual. You know, for lack of a better word,

1:04:16.840 --> 1:04:19.600
<v Speaker 2>it doesn't mean it's religious in any like conventional sense,

1:04:19.680 --> 1:04:23.000
<v Speaker 2>but for some people it is. For me, it actually is,

1:04:24.080 --> 1:04:28.280
<v Speaker 2>but it's it's somehow it requires a willing to, you know,

1:04:28.400 --> 1:04:35.040
<v Speaker 2>an introspection and a level of self inquiry into parts

1:04:35.080 --> 1:04:36.960
<v Speaker 2>of ourselves that we don't really understand.

1:04:37.960 --> 1:04:40.320
<v Speaker 3>I think that's a good place to end it. I

1:04:40.360 --> 1:04:43.680
<v Speaker 3>will just say that, even though it is a heavy

1:04:43.760 --> 1:04:47.960
<v Speaker 3>book a heavy topic, it did as I was reading

1:04:48.040 --> 1:04:50.840
<v Speaker 3>it and then having this conversation with you just now,

1:04:51.960 --> 1:04:54.840
<v Speaker 3>it makes me feel like we're going to find our

1:04:54.920 --> 1:04:59.360
<v Speaker 3>way through it. Don't know how, but there's something about

1:04:59.480 --> 1:05:05.640
<v Speaker 3>confronting the darkness or the despair head on insolidarity with

1:05:05.760 --> 1:05:11.000
<v Speaker 3>other people that makes it feel doable. Not without struggle

1:05:11.040 --> 1:05:15.840
<v Speaker 3>and strife and hardship, but certainly doable. So I am

1:05:16.920 --> 1:05:19.520
<v Speaker 3>very grateful for you for writing the book and for

1:05:19.600 --> 1:05:22.560
<v Speaker 3>this conversation, So thanks very much when really enjoyed it.

1:05:22.680 --> 1:05:24.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, thank you and amen, brother