WEBVTT - Surveillance: Carbon Bubble With Gore

0:00:05.120 --> 0:00:09.200
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. I'm Tom Keane. Along

0:00:09.240 --> 0:00:13.200
<v Speaker 1>with Jonathan Ferrell and Lisa Brownwitz Jailey. We bring you

0:00:13.320 --> 0:00:18.600
<v Speaker 1>insight from the best and economics, finance, investment, and international relations.

0:00:18.960 --> 0:00:23.840
<v Speaker 1>Find Bloomberg Surveillance on Apple podcast, SoundCloud, Bloomberg dot com,

0:00:23.920 --> 0:00:29.960
<v Speaker 1>and of course on the Bloomberg terminal in Glasgow at

0:00:29.960 --> 0:00:33.360
<v Speaker 1>CUP twenty six. There are people that have parachuted into

0:00:33.440 --> 0:00:36.680
<v Speaker 1>climate change that could not be said of the former

0:00:36.800 --> 0:00:39.760
<v Speaker 1>Vice President of the United States, and with that there's

0:00:39.800 --> 0:00:42.960
<v Speaker 1>no need to mention his name. Francine Lacroix with a

0:00:43.000 --> 0:00:49.320
<v Speaker 1>gentleman from Tennessee. Yeah, thank you so much, Tom John

0:00:49.320 --> 0:00:51.159
<v Speaker 1>and Lisa. I am delighted to be speaking to al

0:00:51.240 --> 0:00:54.920
<v Speaker 1>Gore were the the original proponent of sustainability and climate

0:00:55.000 --> 0:00:57.680
<v Speaker 1>change through for years and decades, has been trying to

0:00:57.760 --> 0:01:00.200
<v Speaker 1>make this a reality of Vice President growth. You so

0:01:00.280 --> 0:01:03.520
<v Speaker 1>much for joining us. Thank you. Today's Climate Finance, it's

0:01:03.600 --> 0:01:05.880
<v Speaker 1>we're focusing on the funding, on the finance, on how

0:01:05.880 --> 0:01:09.840
<v Speaker 1>we transition better. I want to ask about your investment firm.

0:01:09.959 --> 0:01:12.319
<v Speaker 1>This is something with the joint ventures with Golden Saxon,

0:01:12.360 --> 0:01:16.720
<v Speaker 1>you're basically only targeting assets that are decarbonizing, which means

0:01:16.720 --> 0:01:19.160
<v Speaker 1>that all the portfolios are well below the one point

0:01:19.240 --> 0:01:23.800
<v Speaker 1>five degrees. Is this how you do it? Right? Yeah? Well,

0:01:23.880 --> 0:01:27.760
<v Speaker 1>Generation Investment Management was one of the small group that

0:01:27.840 --> 0:01:31.960
<v Speaker 1>convened this net zero Asset Managers initiative, and it's now

0:01:32.080 --> 0:01:35.480
<v Speaker 1>up to this incredibly large number of fifty two trillion

0:01:35.840 --> 0:01:38.480
<v Speaker 1>dollars and it's part of the larger package that Mark

0:01:38.600 --> 0:01:42.320
<v Speaker 1>Arney talked about. The rules of the road are are

0:01:42.360 --> 0:01:46.560
<v Speaker 1>still being worked out in great detail. Uh. For for

0:01:46.680 --> 0:01:51.000
<v Speaker 1>our part, we are actually committed to net zero, real

0:01:51.160 --> 0:01:56.560
<v Speaker 1>net nead zero. Uh. Some who have made this commitment

0:01:56.640 --> 0:02:01.320
<v Speaker 1>are still working toward that man maximum goal. And I

0:02:01.360 --> 0:02:04.920
<v Speaker 1>think what you're seeing here in this conference overall is

0:02:04.960 --> 0:02:07.920
<v Speaker 1>a big wheel turning slowly. I think the world is

0:02:07.960 --> 0:02:12.920
<v Speaker 1>awakening to the dire danger our civilization is in. And

0:02:12.919 --> 0:02:16.239
<v Speaker 1>I won't go into all that, but obviously Mother Nature

0:02:16.320 --> 0:02:19.239
<v Speaker 1>is making the point very powerfully and people are now responding,

0:02:19.280 --> 0:02:22.840
<v Speaker 1>and in the finance sector they are now saying, look,

0:02:22.960 --> 0:02:24.480
<v Speaker 1>we got to be part of the solution, and we

0:02:24.560 --> 0:02:26.880
<v Speaker 1>got to stop funding the problem. How do we turn

0:02:26.919 --> 0:02:30.040
<v Speaker 1>the wheel faster? So, if you're an investor today, how

0:02:30.040 --> 0:02:32.640
<v Speaker 1>do you avoid greenwashing? How do you avoid making the

0:02:32.720 --> 0:02:36.200
<v Speaker 1>mistakes that then leads to probe saying your financial product

0:02:36.320 --> 0:02:39.680
<v Speaker 1>is not s G enough. Well, in its essence, screenwashing

0:02:39.840 --> 0:02:43.600
<v Speaker 1>is just a cheap trick that people are beginning to

0:02:43.639 --> 0:02:47.520
<v Speaker 1>see through. Uh. It won't work for long. Uh. In

0:02:47.639 --> 0:02:50.280
<v Speaker 1>the age of the Internet, people are ferretting out what's

0:02:50.320 --> 0:02:53.200
<v Speaker 1>real and what's not it. It will take a little time.

0:02:53.760 --> 0:02:58.200
<v Speaker 1>But you know, society as a whole is now insisting

0:02:58.800 --> 0:03:02.280
<v Speaker 1>that all of the institute usians of our civilization begin

0:03:02.360 --> 0:03:05.040
<v Speaker 1>to respond to this with the sense of urgency that

0:03:05.160 --> 0:03:08.720
<v Speaker 1>that's appropriate. And that's why you've seen this wave of

0:03:08.880 --> 0:03:13.120
<v Speaker 1>E s G investing, albeit with a lot of greenwashing. Uh.

0:03:13.120 --> 0:03:15.839
<v Speaker 1>And and as people begin to focus more intently, they're

0:03:15.840 --> 0:03:18.880
<v Speaker 1>going to insist that they do it for real and

0:03:18.919 --> 0:03:22.680
<v Speaker 1>get rid of this greenwashing. How do you measure success

0:03:22.760 --> 0:03:24.480
<v Speaker 1>if you look at some of the things, for example,

0:03:24.520 --> 0:03:27.200
<v Speaker 1>investment products. I know we're waiting for a common language,

0:03:27.320 --> 0:03:30.800
<v Speaker 1>we're waiting for taxonomy, we're waiting for a price on carbon.

0:03:31.320 --> 0:03:33.519
<v Speaker 1>But how do you make sure that investors don't walk

0:03:33.560 --> 0:03:36.400
<v Speaker 1>away from cop with a pat on the vaccine? We've

0:03:36.440 --> 0:03:38.080
<v Speaker 1>done the job, but let's go back to business. The

0:03:38.080 --> 0:03:39.760
<v Speaker 1>old way. Yeah, I don't think that they're going to

0:03:39.880 --> 0:03:42.640
<v Speaker 1>be able to do that because a lot of the

0:03:42.760 --> 0:03:47.040
<v Speaker 1>large asset owners, including pension funds, are are saying, you know,

0:03:47.840 --> 0:03:51.040
<v Speaker 1>we we want to go with managers that are actually

0:03:51.400 --> 0:03:56.120
<v Speaker 1>committed for real and not just to pretend commitment. Um.

0:03:56.440 --> 0:03:59.040
<v Speaker 1>And I don't think that there's gonna be a letdown

0:03:59.160 --> 0:04:02.480
<v Speaker 1>after this. I think the pressure is on. Uh. This,

0:04:02.480 --> 0:04:07.800
<v Speaker 1>this conference or cop process includes fifty thousand people, and

0:04:08.000 --> 0:04:11.880
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the major commitments and progress that's being

0:04:11.920 --> 0:04:16.000
<v Speaker 1>made take place outside of this plinary hall, take place

0:04:16.040 --> 0:04:21.040
<v Speaker 1>outside of the negotiating sessions, but actually involved people who

0:04:21.120 --> 0:04:25.480
<v Speaker 1>are in finance in who are CEOs of businesses and

0:04:25.520 --> 0:04:28.320
<v Speaker 1>they're hearing from their customers. But how much of a

0:04:28.360 --> 0:04:31.680
<v Speaker 1>problem is that private money, as you say, is going

0:04:31.760 --> 0:04:34.240
<v Speaker 1>faster than public money. And what can we do to

0:04:34.320 --> 0:04:36.839
<v Speaker 1>change that to at least align them. Well, we need

0:04:36.960 --> 0:04:40.719
<v Speaker 1>reform of the multilateral development banks, for sure. The World

0:04:40.720 --> 0:04:44.320
<v Speaker 1>Bank is not yet on side. Uh. And the head

0:04:44.360 --> 0:04:47.320
<v Speaker 1>of the World Bank is a perfectly nice guy appointed

0:04:47.360 --> 0:04:51.320
<v Speaker 1>by the previous US president, chosen by him. Uh. The

0:04:51.360 --> 0:04:53.680
<v Speaker 1>staff is actually very good. They're in my opinion, but

0:04:54.120 --> 0:04:58.480
<v Speaker 1>they're not yet really committed to helping as they should.

0:04:59.080 --> 0:05:02.520
<v Speaker 1>There is a tremen into amount of work going on

0:05:02.800 --> 0:05:05.840
<v Speaker 1>to try to come up with sensible reforms, not only

0:05:05.880 --> 0:05:08.920
<v Speaker 1>at the World Bank Group, but Crystal linea George Eva,

0:05:09.000 --> 0:05:12.159
<v Speaker 1>I think is a real champion here uh and and

0:05:12.400 --> 0:05:15.679
<v Speaker 1>she is pushing hard to get these reforms in place.

0:05:16.000 --> 0:05:18.760
<v Speaker 1>And then there are a whole group of other multilateral

0:05:19.040 --> 0:05:23.440
<v Speaker 1>development banks, regional banks, national banks. There's a general awakening

0:05:23.480 --> 0:05:27.279
<v Speaker 1>among all of them. Here's an example, what francing. Uh

0:05:27.520 --> 0:05:30.680
<v Speaker 1>If if you're a business in Nigeria and you want

0:05:30.680 --> 0:05:34.000
<v Speaker 1>to build a wind farm, your interest rate is seven

0:05:34.080 --> 0:05:36.760
<v Speaker 1>times higher than it is if you're in an O

0:05:36.880 --> 0:05:40.800
<v Speaker 1>E C D country. That's insane. Obviously the market is

0:05:40.839 --> 0:05:44.520
<v Speaker 1>perceiving risk of various kinds there. But that's what these

0:05:45.120 --> 0:05:49.039
<v Speaker 1>publicly funded the multilateral development banks should be doing, taking

0:05:49.080 --> 0:05:52.240
<v Speaker 1>that first level of risk off of the table and

0:05:52.279 --> 0:05:54.640
<v Speaker 1>speaking for society as a whole and saying it's in

0:05:54.800 --> 0:05:58.920
<v Speaker 1>our public interests to make this transition faster. Why is

0:05:58.960 --> 0:06:01.160
<v Speaker 1>it us not doing? I know we have an agreement

0:06:01.200 --> 0:06:04.520
<v Speaker 1>on methane, but at the same time President Biden has

0:06:04.560 --> 0:06:08.359
<v Speaker 1>been hamstrong with some of the politics back home. Why

0:06:08.520 --> 0:06:11.080
<v Speaker 1>is this happening now, well, we still have a political

0:06:11.480 --> 0:06:15.960
<v Speaker 1>battle to win in the US. UH, and it's a

0:06:16.040 --> 0:06:23.480
<v Speaker 1>divided UH politics in the US, and UH the narrowest

0:06:23.520 --> 0:06:27.360
<v Speaker 1>possible majority in the Senate. So President Biden, I think

0:06:27.360 --> 0:06:31.160
<v Speaker 1>he did a fantastic job with his two days here UH.

0:06:31.320 --> 0:06:33.880
<v Speaker 1>And I think he's done a fantastic job in proposing

0:06:33.880 --> 0:06:37.480
<v Speaker 1>a really meaningful climate package. But it's very tough when

0:06:37.480 --> 0:06:40.240
<v Speaker 1>you have a fifty fifty Senate and a couple of

0:06:40.279 --> 0:06:43.400
<v Speaker 1>the Democratic senators are not yet on board one for

0:06:43.520 --> 0:06:47.479
<v Speaker 1>McCole state, so it's a challenge. I do think that

0:06:48.160 --> 0:06:51.640
<v Speaker 1>in another couple of weeks, I think before the end

0:06:51.680 --> 0:06:54.359
<v Speaker 1>of the year, certainly this package will be passed. It

0:06:54.400 --> 0:06:56.680
<v Speaker 1>may be modified again, but I think it. I think

0:06:56.720 --> 0:06:59.400
<v Speaker 1>it will be passed. We will that help with convincing

0:06:59.520 --> 0:07:04.840
<v Speaker 1>China to come on board or is it about including China? Well, yes,

0:07:04.920 --> 0:07:08.039
<v Speaker 1>I think it has to help and bringing China on board. Yes,

0:07:08.360 --> 0:07:12.520
<v Speaker 1>if if China can say you're preaching temperance from from

0:07:12.520 --> 0:07:14.720
<v Speaker 1>a bar stool, as they say, then it lets them

0:07:14.720 --> 0:07:17.720
<v Speaker 1>off the hook of it. But but I'm convinced that

0:07:17.840 --> 0:07:22.200
<v Speaker 1>China is a serious about making its transition. They're building

0:07:22.200 --> 0:07:24.320
<v Speaker 1>more solar panels and wind farms and the rest of

0:07:24.360 --> 0:07:27.120
<v Speaker 1>the world put together. They're still burning more coal than

0:07:27.120 --> 0:07:29.119
<v Speaker 1>the rest of the world put together, and that has

0:07:29.160 --> 0:07:32.960
<v Speaker 1>to be transitioned away much faster, and they can save

0:07:33.040 --> 0:07:37.280
<v Speaker 1>money by doing it so, But the coal industry in

0:07:37.440 --> 0:07:42.120
<v Speaker 1>China is as powerful as the coal industry in the US,

0:07:42.240 --> 0:07:45.680
<v Speaker 1>and so it obviously is taking some time to make

0:07:45.720 --> 0:07:48.840
<v Speaker 1>that transition. There's an old Chinese proverb I'm told that

0:07:48.880 --> 0:07:51.520
<v Speaker 1>says the mountain is high and the emperor is far away.

0:07:52.000 --> 0:07:54.880
<v Speaker 1>I think that some of the regional governments in China

0:07:54.960 --> 0:08:00.480
<v Speaker 1>have close ties with coal and coal related industrial opera rations,

0:08:00.480 --> 0:08:02.680
<v Speaker 1>and it takes it's taking them some time to get

0:08:02.680 --> 0:08:05.400
<v Speaker 1>them on board. But they've introduced carbon pricing in a

0:08:05.680 --> 0:08:08.800
<v Speaker 1>in a chunk of their society. It's due to expand

0:08:09.240 --> 0:08:12.480
<v Speaker 1>they have put out a net zero goal. It's far

0:08:13.440 --> 0:08:16.080
<v Speaker 1>farther out than I would like it to be, but

0:08:16.600 --> 0:08:18.600
<v Speaker 1>they plan their work and work their plan, and I

0:08:18.640 --> 0:08:21.600
<v Speaker 1>think they're determined to do it. Vice President. When we

0:08:21.800 --> 0:08:24.920
<v Speaker 1>see how much green finance there is out there, I

0:08:24.960 --> 0:08:28.160
<v Speaker 1>had a chief executive calling it tsunami of green finance.

0:08:28.320 --> 0:08:30.600
<v Speaker 1>What happens to the companies that are not working on

0:08:30.640 --> 0:08:33.760
<v Speaker 1>their transition. Now, well, I think we're in the early

0:08:33.840 --> 0:08:38.000
<v Speaker 1>stages of a sustainability revolution. That's the biggest investing and

0:08:38.120 --> 0:08:42.840
<v Speaker 1>business opportunity in history. Uh. And those who don't recognize

0:08:42.920 --> 0:08:47.800
<v Speaker 1>that and adapt to it are in commercial commercial risk

0:08:47.920 --> 0:08:50.640
<v Speaker 1>of course, because they're they're going to be left behind.

0:08:50.800 --> 0:08:55.360
<v Speaker 1>You remember the subprime mortgage of bubble that led to

0:08:55.400 --> 0:08:58.720
<v Speaker 1>the Great Recession. We now have a sub prime carbon

0:08:58.840 --> 0:09:04.319
<v Speaker 1>bubble of two trillion dollars based on an absurd assumption

0:09:04.400 --> 0:09:07.400
<v Speaker 1>that all of that, all of those carbon fuels are

0:09:07.400 --> 0:09:09.719
<v Speaker 1>going to be burned. They're not going to be. They

0:09:09.760 --> 0:09:14.520
<v Speaker 1>cannot be, especially because the new renewable sources of electricity

0:09:14.559 --> 0:09:18.959
<v Speaker 1>are much cheaper now and will be cheaper in the world,

0:09:18.960 --> 0:09:21.520
<v Speaker 1>already in two thirds of the world. So that do

0:09:21.559 --> 0:09:23.640
<v Speaker 1>you believe that once we have a carbon market, or

0:09:23.640 --> 0:09:29.200
<v Speaker 1>proper carbon market functioning with prices, that it reprices private assets? Yeah,

0:09:29.280 --> 0:09:33.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean I think that once carbon risk, the climate

0:09:33.679 --> 0:09:38.760
<v Speaker 1>crisis risk is internalized, then yes, it's going to affect

0:09:38.840 --> 0:09:42.920
<v Speaker 1>the value of all these assets. We've had this insane

0:09:43.600 --> 0:09:47.520
<v Speaker 1>illusion that we can just ignore the impact of the

0:09:47.520 --> 0:09:50.400
<v Speaker 1>climate crisis. But mother Nature is telling us no, not

0:09:50.480 --> 0:09:54.040
<v Speaker 1>so fast. And these events are getting more extreme and

0:09:54.120 --> 0:09:58.160
<v Speaker 1>more frequent, and people everywhere are recognizing it and they're

0:09:58.240 --> 0:10:02.679
<v Speaker 1>demanding action. There's resistance, of course, and the legacy fossil

0:10:02.720 --> 0:10:07.160
<v Speaker 1>fuel complex and the bankers that continue to invest hundreds

0:10:07.200 --> 0:10:10.640
<v Speaker 1>of billions of dollars in it every year. They remind

0:10:10.679 --> 0:10:13.720
<v Speaker 1>me of the old cartoon of wiley coyote running off

0:10:13.720 --> 0:10:16.120
<v Speaker 1>the edge of the cliff and the legs keep moving

0:10:16.200 --> 0:10:19.559
<v Speaker 1>until gravity takes hold. We're in that moment now, We're

0:10:19.600 --> 0:10:23.280
<v Speaker 1>in a transition, and those who make the transition faster

0:10:23.440 --> 0:10:26.120
<v Speaker 1>are going to do better as a result. Vice President Gore,

0:10:26.160 --> 0:10:28.480
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much for your time on Bloomberg today,

0:10:28.480 --> 0:10:30.000
<v Speaker 1>and with that, I'm going to send it back to

0:10:30.080 --> 0:10:32.400
<v Speaker 1>you in New York, John, and we'll have plenty more

0:10:32.720 --> 0:10:35.600
<v Speaker 1>from Glasgow. Cup twice France say thank you so much

0:10:35.640 --> 0:10:44.040
<v Speaker 1>to you as well. Eric Adams is from Brooklyn. He

0:10:44.559 --> 0:10:48.679
<v Speaker 1>joins us this morning. Congratulations, Eric Adams. I just mentioned

0:10:48.720 --> 0:10:52.720
<v Speaker 1>you've done seventy two interviews this morning. How is your Wednesday? Look?

0:10:54.800 --> 0:10:58.400
<v Speaker 1>Busy as you could expect, but exciting and I believe

0:10:58.640 --> 0:11:01.800
<v Speaker 1>that Uh I want to be known as the g

0:11:02.240 --> 0:11:06.800
<v Speaker 1>S D mayor get stuff done. Tram to really deal

0:11:06.880 --> 0:11:08.960
<v Speaker 1>with the problems that we're facing in the city, and

0:11:09.000 --> 0:11:12.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm excited about it. I'm sure you'll accept a congratulations

0:11:12.760 --> 0:11:16.160
<v Speaker 1>call from Mr Jesse at Amazon or Mr Bezos of Amazon.

0:11:17.160 --> 0:11:19.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure you will tell me you would not have

0:11:19.360 --> 0:11:23.120
<v Speaker 1>lost Amazon out of Queen's Amazon looks to move to

0:11:23.280 --> 0:11:27.160
<v Speaker 1>Jersey City or at the margin, moved to Jersey City.

0:11:27.280 --> 0:11:31.200
<v Speaker 1>How do you keep tech jobs in the five boroughs

0:11:32.600 --> 0:11:35.560
<v Speaker 1>by doing what I have been doing for the last

0:11:36.080 --> 0:11:38.800
<v Speaker 1>three months now. I had been sitting down with tech

0:11:38.880 --> 0:11:43.320
<v Speaker 1>leaders ms, several Israeli companies and other companies here in

0:11:43.360 --> 0:11:46.520
<v Speaker 1>the city. Just two days ago I met with thirty

0:11:46.960 --> 0:11:50.040
<v Speaker 1>a large tech startups and in the borough of Brooklyn

0:11:50.360 --> 0:11:53.680
<v Speaker 1>we witnessed a three hundred and fifty six increase in

0:11:53.760 --> 0:11:57.120
<v Speaker 1>tech startups in a tenure period. So this has been

0:11:57.160 --> 0:12:00.200
<v Speaker 1>a place where I believe in technology and how we

0:12:00.360 --> 0:12:04.480
<v Speaker 1>use technology to change the delivery of goods and services

0:12:04.480 --> 0:12:06.920
<v Speaker 1>in this city. I'm not going to mince words, you know,

0:12:06.960 --> 0:12:09.240
<v Speaker 1>it's a tough Bloomberg interview. That's what we do here.

0:12:09.720 --> 0:12:13.560
<v Speaker 1>What is going to be here? Change process. In the

0:12:13.640 --> 0:12:18.800
<v Speaker 1>first thirty days from the mayor, you replace a safety

0:12:18.920 --> 0:12:21.400
<v Speaker 1>zero in on gun and gang violence. We have to

0:12:21.440 --> 0:12:25.720
<v Speaker 1>deal with the actualization of fear and violence and the

0:12:25.800 --> 0:12:29.960
<v Speaker 1>perception because they both become a reality to people. So

0:12:30.000 --> 0:12:33.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to institute an anti gun plane closed unit,

0:12:34.440 --> 0:12:38.120
<v Speaker 1>of which is similarly disbanded by the current mayor, and

0:12:38.160 --> 0:12:42.040
<v Speaker 1>we're going to zero and gun violence. Okay, I don't

0:12:42.160 --> 0:12:44.439
<v Speaker 1>interrupt here, but the news flow is so important Mayor

0:12:44.520 --> 0:12:48.440
<v Speaker 1>that the district attorney elected maybe disagrees with you on

0:12:48.559 --> 0:12:53.760
<v Speaker 1>the how do you put in process planes, closed officers

0:12:54.080 --> 0:12:59.200
<v Speaker 1>to protect the citizens? What's how do you actually affect that? Well,

0:12:59.360 --> 0:13:03.120
<v Speaker 1>some things. I'm won the distric attorney. He prosecute crimes.

0:13:03.280 --> 0:13:06.960
<v Speaker 1>The police department. We arrest people that there is probable

0:13:07.000 --> 0:13:09.240
<v Speaker 1>cause to believe they committed crime, and I'm not going

0:13:09.280 --> 0:13:11.880
<v Speaker 1>to mix the two. I think right now we are

0:13:11.920 --> 0:13:14.439
<v Speaker 1>debated with the laws we don't like in Albany. We

0:13:14.480 --> 0:13:17.560
<v Speaker 1>don't like the way he prosecuted the prosecuting crimes. That's

0:13:17.600 --> 0:13:20.520
<v Speaker 1>not our job. My job is to make sure if

0:13:20.559 --> 0:13:23.400
<v Speaker 1>someone has probable cause to commit a crime. I'm in

0:13:23.600 --> 0:13:26.440
<v Speaker 1>charge of the police department. I don't need approval to

0:13:26.480 --> 0:13:29.320
<v Speaker 1>put in place a plain close anti gun unit. And

0:13:29.360 --> 0:13:31.760
<v Speaker 1>we're going to do our job and let others do

0:13:31.920 --> 0:13:35.000
<v Speaker 1>their jobs. We're speaking with Eric Adams, new York City

0:13:35.120 --> 0:13:39.920
<v Speaker 1>mayor elect. Mr Adams. You know this is this is Bloomberg.

0:13:39.960 --> 0:13:42.720
<v Speaker 1>We think about the markets, we think about um, you know,

0:13:42.800 --> 0:13:45.600
<v Speaker 1>stock exchanges and and right now you know, as we know,

0:13:45.640 --> 0:13:49.160
<v Speaker 1>New York City has been the global leader in global finance.

0:13:49.200 --> 0:13:51.520
<v Speaker 1>I think that's still the case today. The future is

0:13:51.520 --> 0:13:53.120
<v Speaker 1>going to be a little bit differently. We think about

0:13:53.120 --> 0:13:56.680
<v Speaker 1>some things like crypto that is a big, big growth

0:13:56.679 --> 0:14:00.679
<v Speaker 1>of business within the financial services industry and technology. How

0:14:00.720 --> 0:14:03.000
<v Speaker 1>are you going to make New York City a crypto

0:14:03.240 --> 0:14:06.400
<v Speaker 1>friendly city, a crypto leader? Uh? And how would that

0:14:06.480 --> 0:14:10.000
<v Speaker 1>benefit the city? Well, part of the meetings I have

0:14:10.080 --> 0:14:13.440
<v Speaker 1>been having UH is to bring together the whole big

0:14:13.520 --> 0:14:16.480
<v Speaker 1>cooin industry, and we need to do several things with it.

0:14:16.559 --> 0:14:19.680
<v Speaker 1>Number one, we need to look at what's prevented the

0:14:19.760 --> 0:14:24.160
<v Speaker 1>growth of big coins and cryptocurrency in our city. What

0:14:24.280 --> 0:14:25.600
<v Speaker 1>is it in the way of that. I met with

0:14:25.640 --> 0:14:27.640
<v Speaker 1>the mayor of Miami and we're going to have a

0:14:27.680 --> 0:14:32.920
<v Speaker 1>friendly competition. Uh. He's extremely inviting. He has a Miami

0:14:33.080 --> 0:14:36.200
<v Speaker 1>Miami coin that is doing very well. We're going to

0:14:36.200 --> 0:14:38.640
<v Speaker 1>look in the direction to carry that out. We're also

0:14:38.680 --> 0:14:41.040
<v Speaker 1>going to do something else. We have to build out

0:14:41.040 --> 0:14:43.800
<v Speaker 1>a pipeline of young people that can field these jobs

0:14:43.840 --> 0:14:47.080
<v Speaker 1>and understand the new technology. Because we can't have a

0:14:47.160 --> 0:14:51.800
<v Speaker 1>one sided city where certain groups and areas are doing

0:14:51.840 --> 0:14:54.200
<v Speaker 1>well and those of the inner cities are not. I'm

0:14:54.240 --> 0:14:57.280
<v Speaker 1>going to build the pipeline to success in the city.

0:14:57.560 --> 0:14:59.680
<v Speaker 1>Mary Adams. Uh, we have to wrap this up as

0:14:59.720 --> 0:15:02.200
<v Speaker 1>you go of Bloomberg Television to speak with John Farrell.

0:15:02.200 --> 0:15:05.720
<v Speaker 1>Good luck with that. Uh. And I'm kidding, but but but,

0:15:05.880 --> 0:15:08.680
<v Speaker 1>Mary Adams, you walked in once is a tough kid

0:15:08.680 --> 0:15:13.640
<v Speaker 1>in Brooklyn to precinct. That's not tough, that's fancy Fort Green.

0:15:13.760 --> 0:15:16.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you're living large in Fort Green. You've got

0:15:16.640 --> 0:15:19.960
<v Speaker 1>to walk in to a fancy Ford Green or some

0:15:20.000 --> 0:15:23.120
<v Speaker 1>of the toughest districts in this city. Is an ex

0:15:23.200 --> 0:15:27.640
<v Speaker 1>cop with people who maybe didn't vote for you, maybe

0:15:27.720 --> 0:15:30.680
<v Speaker 1>didn't get behind you because they have a more traditional view.

0:15:31.320 --> 0:15:34.440
<v Speaker 1>How do you make peace with the line officers of

0:15:34.440 --> 0:15:39.280
<v Speaker 1>the New York Police Department. Well, first, it's very important

0:15:39.440 --> 0:15:43.040
<v Speaker 1>not to view geographical areas of the city during our

0:15:43.040 --> 0:15:46.480
<v Speaker 1>current time. Yes, for Green is wonderful right now with

0:15:46.560 --> 0:15:49.720
<v Speaker 1>multimillion dollar homes. But I was there when we were

0:15:49.760 --> 0:15:53.360
<v Speaker 1>dealing with real robberies, real crimes. And I also controlled

0:15:53.440 --> 0:15:56.160
<v Speaker 1>this city at the transit cop during the mid eighties

0:15:56.240 --> 0:15:58.640
<v Speaker 1>Ryan and subway system with a radio that did not

0:15:58.720 --> 0:16:03.000
<v Speaker 1>operate alone by myself. So we start talking about tough,

0:16:03.400 --> 0:16:05.800
<v Speaker 1>That's what I know. It's tough getting off the flow

0:16:05.800 --> 0:16:08.240
<v Speaker 1>of a police and after you are rested, tough in

0:16:08.320 --> 0:16:11.840
<v Speaker 1>a dishwasher, going to school at night, surviving education with

0:16:11.880 --> 0:16:15.400
<v Speaker 1>a learning disability that was undiagnosed. Tough is not something

0:16:15.440 --> 0:16:17.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm afraid of, and tough is not something that New

0:16:17.880 --> 0:16:20.520
<v Speaker 1>York is off radio. We're resilient and we're going to

0:16:20.560 --> 0:16:23.880
<v Speaker 1>be fine. New York is bad. I'm Bloomberg Radio, Eric

0:16:23.920 --> 0:16:27.320
<v Speaker 1>Adams with us. He will continue, I'm Bloomberg Television worldwide

0:16:27.720 --> 0:16:30.520
<v Speaker 1>as well. Mayor Adams, congratulations and thank you so much

0:16:30.560 --> 0:16:32.960
<v Speaker 1>for joining us as well. Boy Paul, is that a

0:16:33.000 --> 0:16:35.960
<v Speaker 1>different tone from I mean, I'm not trying to get

0:16:36.000 --> 0:16:38.120
<v Speaker 1>into the politics of it. I will state as a

0:16:38.240 --> 0:16:40.320
<v Speaker 1>fact that's a different That is a different tone, and

0:16:40.360 --> 0:16:42.800
<v Speaker 1>it's probably reflective of what a lot of folks in

0:16:42.800 --> 0:16:44.320
<v Speaker 1>New York City you're feeling, which is we need to

0:16:44.360 --> 0:16:46.960
<v Speaker 1>kind of get control back at this city here. Um.

0:16:47.320 --> 0:16:49.640
<v Speaker 1>And so that's certainly been one of the messages from

0:16:49.640 --> 0:16:52.560
<v Speaker 1>Mayor elect Adams. And so again he'll have a you know,

0:16:52.800 --> 0:16:55.240
<v Speaker 1>as you mentioned in your question, you know that's those

0:16:55.240 --> 0:16:57.840
<v Speaker 1>first thirty days. Boy, there's a lot to get done

0:16:57.840 --> 0:17:00.560
<v Speaker 1>and and and setting the tone. I guess him longer

0:17:00.600 --> 0:17:04.760
<v Speaker 1>than thirty days. But but to all of our audience

0:17:04.800 --> 0:17:08.520
<v Speaker 1>worldwide and across this nation, unfortunately, what the mayor talks

0:17:08.560 --> 0:17:13.600
<v Speaker 1>about on people's fears, it's true. It's across all income

0:17:13.680 --> 0:17:17.480
<v Speaker 1>levels everyone. You just could feel it in the city. Ye.

0:17:17.840 --> 0:17:20.560
<v Speaker 1>And it's tangible. Yeah. And if we've we've seen this

0:17:20.600 --> 0:17:22.439
<v Speaker 1>before in New York City, and if you could if

0:17:22.440 --> 0:17:24.800
<v Speaker 1>you can get that under control, if you can get

0:17:24.800 --> 0:17:27.280
<v Speaker 1>that managed, and then a lot of other things fall

0:17:27.320 --> 0:17:31.600
<v Speaker 1>into place, whether it's investment, whether it's tourism, um and um.

0:17:31.720 --> 0:17:34.320
<v Speaker 1>But that we've seen this before, and we've seen we

0:17:34.400 --> 0:17:37.159
<v Speaker 1>have a playbook, and you know certainly would need to

0:17:37.160 --> 0:17:39.800
<v Speaker 1>be adjusted for the times presumably, but that will probably

0:17:39.920 --> 0:17:43.159
<v Speaker 1>one of the, if not the leading job for the

0:17:43.160 --> 0:17:45.800
<v Speaker 1>mayor elect on day one. You see how I behave myself? Yeah,

0:17:45.920 --> 0:17:48.160
<v Speaker 1>very well, I said very well. I didn't say, Mr

0:17:48.240 --> 0:17:52.639
<v Speaker 1>Mayor the pothole. If they haven't fourth Street, can we

0:17:52.680 --> 0:17:55.919
<v Speaker 1>get that fixed? Exactly? I didn't bring up Street between

0:17:56.200 --> 0:18:06.360
<v Speaker 1>six and exactly as we can do. We can rip

0:18:06.440 --> 0:18:08.919
<v Speaker 1>up the script with Abby Joseph Coh and she has

0:18:08.960 --> 0:18:12.040
<v Speaker 1>acclaimed at Golden Sax. She is one of the people

0:18:12.160 --> 0:18:16.080
<v Speaker 1>that keeps the fearful in the market participating and David

0:18:16.160 --> 0:18:19.359
<v Speaker 1>Costan's great bull market over at the Goldmen Sax shop.

0:18:19.760 --> 0:18:23.240
<v Speaker 1>We're thrilled at the advisory director and senior investment strategist

0:18:23.280 --> 0:18:25.960
<v Speaker 1>at Golden Sex joins us this morning. Abby, I'm going

0:18:26.000 --> 0:18:27.800
<v Speaker 1>to rip up the script and I can do this

0:18:28.200 --> 0:18:32.119
<v Speaker 1>for someone who wrote Aristotle on investment decision making in

0:18:32.119 --> 0:18:36.400
<v Speaker 1>the Financial Analyst Journal a million years ago. Abby, we're

0:18:36.480 --> 0:18:40.840
<v Speaker 1>all getting length here. We're all playing the parlor game

0:18:40.920 --> 0:18:47.720
<v Speaker 1>of extending the X axis. We've been here before, haven't we.

0:18:47.720 --> 0:18:50.159
<v Speaker 1>We certainly have Tom and it's a pleasure to be

0:18:50.280 --> 0:18:53.399
<v Speaker 1>with you in the team. Another word we could use

0:18:53.520 --> 0:18:59.159
<v Speaker 1>is protracted. Basically, there are several factors now behind the

0:18:59.160 --> 0:19:03.000
<v Speaker 1>inflation that we're seeing globally. Some of these may prove

0:19:03.080 --> 0:19:06.919
<v Speaker 1>to be transitory, yet protracted. That includes some of the

0:19:06.960 --> 0:19:10.840
<v Speaker 1>supply chain issues but some of them do represent the

0:19:10.880 --> 0:19:14.080
<v Speaker 1>sort of inflation that one gets during the course of

0:19:14.119 --> 0:19:17.720
<v Speaker 1>an economic expansion, And the one that I'm looking at

0:19:17.800 --> 0:19:22.240
<v Speaker 1>most closely has to do with wages. We have seen

0:19:22.560 --> 0:19:26.399
<v Speaker 1>a notable pickup in average hourly earnings, and on the

0:19:26.400 --> 0:19:30.399
<v Speaker 1>one hand, that's terrific because it says something about the

0:19:30.400 --> 0:19:34.600
<v Speaker 1>ability of consumers to continue to spend, and it also

0:19:35.040 --> 0:19:38.199
<v Speaker 1>tries to get across the idea that we did go

0:19:38.280 --> 0:19:41.880
<v Speaker 1>through an extended period prior to the pandemic in which

0:19:41.920 --> 0:19:46.000
<v Speaker 1>wages were not quite keeping up. However, if those wages

0:19:46.040 --> 0:19:49.280
<v Speaker 1>get embedded um in the economy, what we do see

0:19:49.359 --> 0:19:52.359
<v Speaker 1>is that core c P I and more importantly for

0:19:52.400 --> 0:19:57.440
<v Speaker 1>the Fed core pc E UH moves up. But the

0:19:57.560 --> 0:20:02.760
<v Speaker 1>expectation of my Goldman Sack economist colleagues is that we

0:20:02.800 --> 0:20:05.879
<v Speaker 1>will start to see that calm down. One other point,

0:20:05.920 --> 0:20:08.359
<v Speaker 1>if I may, and that is we're still in a

0:20:08.440 --> 0:20:12.679
<v Speaker 1>period where you and your comparisons are really difficult to

0:20:12.720 --> 0:20:17.880
<v Speaker 1>do because we are emerging from this extraordinary period. Now,

0:20:18.119 --> 0:20:22.600
<v Speaker 1>a year ago, personal spending was negative UH. This year

0:20:22.640 --> 0:20:25.480
<v Speaker 1>it's positive. So what do we think is going to happen?

0:20:26.040 --> 0:20:28.199
<v Speaker 1>They're going to be some price pressures and they're going

0:20:28.240 --> 0:20:30.399
<v Speaker 1>to be some supply chain pressures as well. I mean,

0:20:30.480 --> 0:20:32.960
<v Speaker 1>let's do some Cornell mathematics here, and it's about the

0:20:33.040 --> 0:20:35.640
<v Speaker 1>rates of change and the dynamics involved, and we can

0:20:35.760 --> 0:20:37.880
<v Speaker 1>look at wage growth is I I agree with your

0:20:37.880 --> 0:20:43.199
<v Speaker 1>core theme there is well. The gloom Crew speaks of

0:20:43.240 --> 0:20:47.520
<v Speaker 1>abrupt They speak of gross second derivatives and even harmful

0:20:47.560 --> 0:20:52.159
<v Speaker 1>first derivatives. Your shop says, calm down, state why we

0:20:52.200 --> 0:20:56.719
<v Speaker 1>should calm down and avoid the fear of dynamics. I

0:20:56.760 --> 0:20:59.439
<v Speaker 1>think we should calm down for a few reasons. Tom

0:20:59.560 --> 0:21:02.840
<v Speaker 1>One is, as you point out, the mathematics, uh, the

0:21:02.920 --> 0:21:06.560
<v Speaker 1>year in your comparisons are really fraught right now, and

0:21:06.600 --> 0:21:10.320
<v Speaker 1>we'd much rather look at an extended period of what's

0:21:10.359 --> 0:21:13.160
<v Speaker 1>happening and what's happening at the core level. The other

0:21:13.200 --> 0:21:15.280
<v Speaker 1>thing we need to keep in mind is that there

0:21:15.280 --> 0:21:18.920
<v Speaker 1>are several factors out there, three big ones that work

0:21:19.000 --> 0:21:23.240
<v Speaker 1>in the opposite direction, that may suggest that economic growth

0:21:23.280 --> 0:21:27.400
<v Speaker 1>will actually have the breaks somewhat applied, even if the

0:21:27.400 --> 0:21:31.560
<v Speaker 1>FED doesn't do anything. What are they? Number one, we

0:21:31.600 --> 0:21:35.280
<v Speaker 1>are seeing right now a change in fiscal policy, and

0:21:35.280 --> 0:21:38.639
<v Speaker 1>I'm not talking about the packages that are stuck in Congress.

0:21:38.680 --> 0:21:42.480
<v Speaker 1>What we're seeing is that the programs that were previously

0:21:42.560 --> 0:21:47.760
<v Speaker 1>implemented are rolling off, and so the increase in federal spending,

0:21:48.600 --> 0:21:51.760
<v Speaker 1>which was as you know, robust and equal to about

0:21:51.840 --> 0:21:55.840
<v Speaker 1>nine percent of GDP earlier in the pandemic, is now

0:21:55.920 --> 0:21:59.240
<v Speaker 1>going to be growing at about one percent, and if

0:21:59.520 --> 0:22:04.200
<v Speaker 1>fiscal policy isn't changed, it will be down about two

0:22:04.560 --> 0:22:08.560
<v Speaker 1>next year in two So that's a bit of a break. Uh.

0:22:08.600 --> 0:22:10.919
<v Speaker 1>The other thing that we have to keep in mind

0:22:11.320 --> 0:22:14.359
<v Speaker 1>is that we are not seeing of the sword of

0:22:14.920 --> 0:22:19.640
<v Speaker 1>wrote rebound that many had expected in terms of employment.

0:22:20.040 --> 0:22:22.879
<v Speaker 1>Not talking about the unemployment rate, I'm talking about the

0:22:22.920 --> 0:22:26.040
<v Speaker 1>participation rate, where there are many groups of people who

0:22:26.040 --> 0:22:28.600
<v Speaker 1>are saying either they don't want to come back into

0:22:28.640 --> 0:22:30.800
<v Speaker 1>the workforce, where they don't want to do it now.

0:22:31.280 --> 0:22:34.719
<v Speaker 1>So this includes working moms who are having a problem

0:22:34.760 --> 0:22:38.119
<v Speaker 1>with childcare and their kids are not yet vaccinated. It

0:22:38.200 --> 0:22:42.879
<v Speaker 1>includes retirees. Uh, the baby boom generation a very large

0:22:42.920 --> 0:22:46.720
<v Speaker 1>cohort in the United States. UM. And let's not forget

0:22:46.800 --> 0:22:50.520
<v Speaker 1>the missing immigrants. In the decade prior to the pandemic,

0:22:50.760 --> 0:22:53.800
<v Speaker 1>about ten percent of the net growth in the US

0:22:53.920 --> 0:22:56.879
<v Speaker 1>labor force was due to immigration, both at the lower

0:22:57.000 --> 0:23:00.640
<v Speaker 1>end of the spectrum and at the high end very

0:23:00.720 --> 0:23:04.639
<v Speaker 1>skilled people. We've seen that reduce one more factor, if

0:23:04.680 --> 0:23:09.000
<v Speaker 1>I may, and that is while the US and many

0:23:09.000 --> 0:23:13.879
<v Speaker 1>other nations are slowly now emerging from pandemic restrictions, China

0:23:14.320 --> 0:23:19.719
<v Speaker 1>is extremely tough on these restrictions. And China has roughly

0:23:20.119 --> 0:23:24.320
<v Speaker 1>of the world's global manufacturing capacity. If they tighten up

0:23:24.720 --> 0:23:29.720
<v Speaker 1>or stay tight, that has implications for economic growth. Everyone's

0:23:29.760 --> 0:23:34.280
<v Speaker 1>been focusing on the supply chain and the inflationary aspects.

0:23:34.440 --> 0:23:37.199
<v Speaker 1>It also has impact on the growth abby. All of

0:23:37.240 --> 0:23:40.600
<v Speaker 1>this sounds fairly negative. However, I wonder if the biggest

0:23:40.600 --> 0:23:43.760
<v Speaker 1>pain trade in markets is not being bullish enough, because

0:23:43.760 --> 0:23:47.080
<v Speaker 1>it's frankly supports the idea of real yields being as

0:23:47.119 --> 0:23:50.080
<v Speaker 1>negative as they are, and they're being a supportive backdrop

0:23:50.400 --> 0:23:53.879
<v Speaker 1>for risk at least been in monetary and fiscal policy standpoint.

0:23:53.920 --> 0:23:56.119
<v Speaker 1>Do you agree that pain the pain trade is not

0:23:56.160 --> 0:24:00.560
<v Speaker 1>being bullish enough, not necessarily being barished, potentially failing to

0:24:00.640 --> 0:24:04.000
<v Speaker 1>be so. Yeah, you know, the the economics team that

0:24:04.080 --> 0:24:07.080
<v Speaker 1>I work with does believe this will be a protracted

0:24:07.119 --> 0:24:11.679
<v Speaker 1>process that the FED if it does announce this afternoon,

0:24:11.840 --> 0:24:14.439
<v Speaker 1>as they have signaled that they're going to taper, they

0:24:14.480 --> 0:24:18.119
<v Speaker 1>will taple taper very gradually, and that the rise in

0:24:18.480 --> 0:24:21.320
<v Speaker 1>rates from the Fed funds level in any event could

0:24:21.320 --> 0:24:24.119
<v Speaker 1>be a year off. But we've already seen, as you

0:24:24.240 --> 0:24:28.080
<v Speaker 1>pointed out earlier, that interest rates have already risen in

0:24:28.200 --> 0:24:32.080
<v Speaker 1>anticipation of this happening. And so the key for the

0:24:32.200 --> 0:24:37.200
<v Speaker 1>stock market in particular will be economic growth and earnings growth.

0:24:37.400 --> 0:24:40.959
<v Speaker 1>And here again I would urge people to recognize that

0:24:41.000 --> 0:24:43.720
<v Speaker 1>those year on year comparisons are going to be very

0:24:43.720 --> 0:24:46.720
<v Speaker 1>difficult to do, uh, simply because we're coming from a

0:24:46.800 --> 0:24:51.520
<v Speaker 1>base that was so incredibly depressed in many industries that

0:24:51.600 --> 0:24:56.960
<v Speaker 1>to talk about that growth rate decelerating, Still good, earning,

0:24:57.040 --> 0:25:00.719
<v Speaker 1>still growing, but the growth rate decelerating, you know, as

0:25:00.880 --> 0:25:03.320
<v Speaker 1>as Tom would put it, the second derivative is not

0:25:04.040 --> 0:25:06.520
<v Speaker 1>like but it's still going to be a good number.

0:25:06.560 --> 0:25:08.399
<v Speaker 1>And I think I've just got a final question to

0:25:08.440 --> 0:25:10.960
<v Speaker 1>squeeze in. Are we doing the Tom Keane, Abby, Joseph

0:25:11.000 --> 0:25:13.639
<v Speaker 1>coming Christmas mesh all this year? Is that happening some?

0:25:14.280 --> 0:25:16.399
<v Speaker 1>It's up to Miss Joseph Cohen. Her people have not

0:25:16.520 --> 0:25:18.720
<v Speaker 1>talked about can your talent sappy? Is it happening? I

0:25:18.760 --> 0:25:20.480
<v Speaker 1>look forward to this every year? Are we doing it?

0:25:20.520 --> 0:25:24.200
<v Speaker 1>I It will depend up on what Tom has to say. Okay, well,

0:25:24.320 --> 0:25:27.760
<v Speaker 1>very good, whether I whether I get that invitation. I'm

0:25:27.880 --> 0:25:32.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm I'm writing good Christians, John, Can I summarize that?

0:25:32.400 --> 0:25:36.720
<v Speaker 1>I believe it was Joseph Cohen? Uh just predicted SPX

0:25:36.760 --> 0:25:40.639
<v Speaker 1>six thousand. That's what they took out that your inte

0:25:40.680 --> 0:25:45.199
<v Speaker 1>for the Christmas special next stage six un you know,

0:25:45.280 --> 0:25:47.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry, David, it won't happen again. It will never

0:25:47.560 --> 0:25:51.639
<v Speaker 1>happen again, David, Thank you Joseph Cohen again. Happy Joseph

0:25:51.720 --> 0:26:01.360
<v Speaker 1>khin there of government sacks on the secuity market, surveillance fact,

0:26:01.440 --> 0:26:04.200
<v Speaker 1>John Farrell, Lisa Bramwits and I all at gunpoint had

0:26:04.200 --> 0:26:06.480
<v Speaker 1>to read Dickens Tale of to City. He read it

0:26:06.480 --> 0:26:09.040
<v Speaker 1>because he wanted to. Michael Gapon joins us on the

0:26:09.040 --> 0:26:13.560
<v Speaker 1>tail of two tapers now chief US economist Barkley's investment Bank.

0:26:13.840 --> 0:26:17.240
<v Speaker 1>How is a Treasury taper, Michael Gaping different from a

0:26:17.280 --> 0:26:20.560
<v Speaker 1>FED taper? I think it's mainly because the Fed is

0:26:20.600 --> 0:26:23.760
<v Speaker 1>a is a unique holder of treasury securities. Of course,

0:26:23.800 --> 0:26:27.200
<v Speaker 1>they have different incentives, different holding periods, They're different actors.

0:26:27.240 --> 0:26:30.119
<v Speaker 1>So I think it's it's more about yes on that

0:26:30.320 --> 0:26:33.119
<v Speaker 1>these two things are generally canceling themselves out. But the

0:26:33.160 --> 0:26:35.120
<v Speaker 1>feed is backing out of the market is a very

0:26:35.240 --> 0:26:38.840
<v Speaker 1>unique buyer. I think that's still the the main message.

0:26:38.920 --> 0:26:42.520
<v Speaker 1>So I wouldn't take the net the net comparison too far.

0:26:42.640 --> 0:26:44.520
<v Speaker 1>I do think the big news is the Fed. The

0:26:44.560 --> 0:26:47.240
<v Speaker 1>FED will be tapering. The big news is they'll be tapering,

0:26:47.400 --> 0:26:51.040
<v Speaker 1>and they will be cautious and conservative. Is the August

0:26:51.080 --> 0:26:56.800
<v Speaker 1>institution is in this November. How measured will Chairman Powell be?

0:26:57.760 --> 0:26:59.760
<v Speaker 1>I think it'll be a fairly measured. Typically when the

0:26:59.800 --> 0:27:03.000
<v Speaker 1>Fed it is tightening policy in some form, they like

0:27:03.119 --> 0:27:05.439
<v Speaker 1>to offset it by giving you a little something on

0:27:05.480 --> 0:27:08.000
<v Speaker 1>the other side. And and I don't think that's going

0:27:08.040 --> 0:27:10.879
<v Speaker 1>to be a strong pushback against market pricing. I just

0:27:10.920 --> 0:27:13.679
<v Speaker 1>think it will be an emphasis that the decision to

0:27:13.760 --> 0:27:16.120
<v Speaker 1>taper and the decision to lift rates are two very

0:27:16.160 --> 0:27:19.000
<v Speaker 1>different things. They have different criterion. The bar for lifting

0:27:19.080 --> 0:27:21.440
<v Speaker 1>rates is higher, and that's a long way off. So

0:27:21.480 --> 0:27:23.520
<v Speaker 1>I think that's that's going to be what he'll try

0:27:23.560 --> 0:27:26.120
<v Speaker 1>to kind of soft pedal to taper message with yes,

0:27:26.160 --> 0:27:29.280
<v Speaker 1>we're starting to taper, Yes we're still concerned about risk

0:27:29.320 --> 0:27:31.760
<v Speaker 1>to the outlook for inflation next year. Yes, there's a

0:27:31.880 --> 0:27:35.679
<v Speaker 1>risk management component to this decision, but you know, really

0:27:35.880 --> 0:27:39.159
<v Speaker 1>don't push this too far. There are two separate decisions.

0:27:39.240 --> 0:27:42.359
<v Speaker 1>I think that's where his cautious will will come in. Michael,

0:27:42.400 --> 0:27:44.000
<v Speaker 1>do you expect him to say that we expect a

0:27:44.080 --> 0:27:48.960
<v Speaker 1>lengthier transitory period going forward. I think that's so he

0:27:49.040 --> 0:27:51.159
<v Speaker 1>were debating this in the last segment. It kind of

0:27:51.200 --> 0:27:54.359
<v Speaker 1>has become a dirty word. Um, it wasn't in his

0:27:54.440 --> 0:27:57.520
<v Speaker 1>press conference statement last time around. He didn't mention it

0:27:57.560 --> 0:28:00.359
<v Speaker 1>in the press conference itself. That word trans the tory,

0:28:00.400 --> 0:28:03.040
<v Speaker 1>it's in the statement. So yeah, I think that flavor

0:28:03.119 --> 0:28:06.000
<v Speaker 1>of that has to stay. I still think in general,

0:28:06.040 --> 0:28:08.840
<v Speaker 1>their forecasts are all consistent in ours are still very

0:28:08.880 --> 0:28:12.000
<v Speaker 1>consistent with a you know, a transitory or temporary impulse.

0:28:12.080 --> 0:28:14.360
<v Speaker 1>The duration of it is just longer than we than

0:28:14.400 --> 0:28:15.840
<v Speaker 1>we thought. So I think they have to find a

0:28:15.840 --> 0:28:19.080
<v Speaker 1>way to keep that flavor around, but maybe back away

0:28:19.119 --> 0:28:21.639
<v Speaker 1>from the pure usage of of that word. What's the

0:28:21.640 --> 0:28:25.040
<v Speaker 1>potential market reaction if fed share J. Powell does not

0:28:25.200 --> 0:28:28.760
<v Speaker 1>push back significantly against the idea of one or even

0:28:28.800 --> 0:28:31.560
<v Speaker 1>two rate hikes next year. Well, in the short run.

0:28:31.800 --> 0:28:34.240
<v Speaker 1>It may mean that the market moves to to pricing

0:28:34.880 --> 0:28:38.240
<v Speaker 1>more hikes, as they've done elsewhere. So and as certainly

0:28:38.240 --> 0:28:42.160
<v Speaker 1>they did say immediately following Legard's press conference, uh, you

0:28:42.200 --> 0:28:45.240
<v Speaker 1>know previously. So. But from the Fed's point of view,

0:28:45.720 --> 0:28:47.360
<v Speaker 1>and I think they're right on this, it's a long

0:28:47.400 --> 0:28:50.080
<v Speaker 1>way out for them. It's at least six months down

0:28:50.120 --> 0:28:52.520
<v Speaker 1>the road for them. Given what they know today, they

0:28:52.560 --> 0:28:55.880
<v Speaker 1>don't really have any incentive to push back strongly against

0:28:55.880 --> 0:28:59.080
<v Speaker 1>market pricing or or confirm it. So, you know, I

0:28:59.080 --> 0:29:01.720
<v Speaker 1>think on this point, it's get the taper decision done,

0:29:02.200 --> 0:29:04.960
<v Speaker 1>communicate that there are two separate decisions in terms of

0:29:05.000 --> 0:29:08.000
<v Speaker 1>tapering versus liftoff, and kind of let the markets have

0:29:08.080 --> 0:29:11.640
<v Speaker 1>at it. Michael, frame for us the immovable force of

0:29:11.760 --> 0:29:16.760
<v Speaker 1>gross excess savings or I should say excess gross savings

0:29:17.240 --> 0:29:21.320
<v Speaker 1>and also the immovable forces everybody's moving their terminal values

0:29:21.680 --> 0:29:26.720
<v Speaker 1>out to a lengthier out. Put those two together right now. Yeah.

0:29:26.760 --> 0:29:28.440
<v Speaker 1>I think part of it is so there is this

0:29:28.800 --> 0:29:31.200
<v Speaker 1>big pool of excess saving that's out there, and it's

0:29:31.240 --> 0:29:34.760
<v Speaker 1>still we're just really now getting to the point whether

0:29:34.840 --> 0:29:37.320
<v Speaker 1>we will know whether households are going to be drawing

0:29:37.360 --> 0:29:39.680
<v Speaker 1>down on that pool of saving if if they do,

0:29:39.720 --> 0:29:42.480
<v Speaker 1>because really right now it's government stimulus has faded out

0:29:42.520 --> 0:29:46.000
<v Speaker 1>to the point where the personal savings rate is almost

0:29:46.000 --> 0:29:49.120
<v Speaker 1>back to pre pandemic levels. So you could see a

0:29:49.160 --> 0:29:52.239
<v Speaker 1>situation now where the saving rate goes below let's call

0:29:52.280 --> 0:29:55.600
<v Speaker 1>it low single digits, and we'll see whether households draw

0:29:55.680 --> 0:29:58.640
<v Speaker 1>down on that. If if they do, then that's a

0:29:58.680 --> 0:30:01.640
<v Speaker 1>situation where you could come buying that with with federal

0:30:01.680 --> 0:30:05.080
<v Speaker 1>spending or infrastructure spending, and you have a prolonged period

0:30:05.280 --> 0:30:08.800
<v Speaker 1>of above trend growth in in the future. Uh, and

0:30:08.880 --> 0:30:12.280
<v Speaker 1>depending on where inflation is, that could be a longer cycle.

0:30:12.400 --> 0:30:14.320
<v Speaker 1>So I think that's how I would interpret it in

0:30:14.440 --> 0:30:17.680
<v Speaker 1>terms of the contribution it could bring to demand, how

0:30:17.680 --> 0:30:20.520
<v Speaker 1>long it keeps growth above trend, and therefore what it

0:30:20.640 --> 0:30:23.320
<v Speaker 1>might mean for the duration of of the tightening cycle. Michael,

0:30:23.360 --> 0:30:26.640
<v Speaker 1>have we reached the point where jobs markets, jobs data

0:30:26.680 --> 0:30:28.400
<v Speaker 1>that we get as we're going to get on Friday,

0:30:28.800 --> 0:30:31.840
<v Speaker 1>really do indicate a shift or something true or are

0:30:31.880 --> 0:30:35.000
<v Speaker 1>we just still seeing the comeback of a market that

0:30:35.120 --> 0:30:38.400
<v Speaker 1>was so severely distorted by the pandemic. I think it's

0:30:38.440 --> 0:30:41.160
<v Speaker 1>the latter. I think this is you know, we've We've

0:30:41.200 --> 0:30:44.120
<v Speaker 1>debated about forecasts and the accuracy of models and so forth,

0:30:44.160 --> 0:30:46.120
<v Speaker 1>and you know, we can do that all day, but

0:30:46.160 --> 0:30:48.600
<v Speaker 1>I think this is one point where we in the

0:30:48.600 --> 0:30:51.600
<v Speaker 1>economist community, I think have been pretty consistent. We've said,

0:30:51.720 --> 0:30:53.920
<v Speaker 1>I believe it's going to take twelve to twenty four

0:30:53.960 --> 0:30:56.719
<v Speaker 1>to thirty six months to sort this all out. So

0:30:56.840 --> 0:30:58.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm still in that camp. If you look at the

0:30:58.880 --> 0:31:02.080
<v Speaker 1>at the data, for example, Bowl the data will tell

0:31:02.120 --> 0:31:04.680
<v Speaker 1>you about four million people were out of the job

0:31:04.760 --> 0:31:07.560
<v Speaker 1>market last month because either they had COVID or they

0:31:07.560 --> 0:31:10.960
<v Speaker 1>were taking care of somebody who has COVID. So that's

0:31:10.960 --> 0:31:14.680
<v Speaker 1>a huge number, and obviously that rotates over over time,

0:31:15.160 --> 0:31:17.240
<v Speaker 1>and the in terms of who's been out of the

0:31:17.320 --> 0:31:20.600
<v Speaker 1>labor force, it's it's mainly a married couple where financial

0:31:20.640 --> 0:31:24.160
<v Speaker 1>resources generally can be shared. So one person is stepping

0:31:24.160 --> 0:31:26.600
<v Speaker 1>out for one reason or another. There's a lot of

0:31:26.680 --> 0:31:29.040
<v Speaker 1>room for that to heal over time. We're not going

0:31:29.080 --> 0:31:31.040
<v Speaker 1>to know in the next two to three months whether

0:31:31.080 --> 0:31:34.120
<v Speaker 1>that changes. It's likely to be a long process. So

0:31:34.160 --> 0:31:36.520
<v Speaker 1>that's my view is it will come back more incrementally

0:31:36.560 --> 0:31:39.120
<v Speaker 1>and it's going to take six to nine to twelve

0:31:39.200 --> 0:31:41.560
<v Speaker 1>months to get a good idea of where that is, Michael.

0:31:41.560 --> 0:31:43.920
<v Speaker 1>Thank you, sir, Michael, gap in there. I appreciate the

0:31:43.960 --> 0:31:47.560
<v Speaker 1>sound of a busy office, a busy trading floor. Yes,

0:31:50.000 --> 0:31:51.840
<v Speaker 1>it's going to have you back. Thank you, sir. That's

0:31:51.880 --> 0:31:59.640
<v Speaker 1>always said the Glasgow, Scotland and catch up with Blimbergs

0:31:59.640 --> 0:32:02.760
<v Speaker 1>trying in likewise, but we still morning, Francine, and we

0:32:02.840 --> 0:32:06.800
<v Speaker 1>are still good morning John. I'm delighted actually to be

0:32:06.880 --> 0:32:08.720
<v Speaker 1>here AT's a day four, because it started on Sunday

0:32:08.760 --> 0:32:10.240
<v Speaker 1>a little bit quieter. I know there's a lot of

0:32:10.240 --> 0:32:12.560
<v Speaker 1>noise behind me, just because there's a lot of the

0:32:12.560 --> 0:32:15.280
<v Speaker 1>big Wall Street titans. I just saw very thing walks

0:32:15.280 --> 0:32:17.760
<v Speaker 1>through the planary because today is finance Day. We also

0:32:17.840 --> 0:32:20.840
<v Speaker 1>heard from Secretary yelling moments, oh go. I am delighted

0:32:20.880 --> 0:32:23.360
<v Speaker 1>to be joined now by the astro Zenica chief executive

0:32:23.400 --> 0:32:26.719
<v Speaker 1>officers that Pasca saw you to talk about all things sustainable,

0:32:26.920 --> 0:32:28.880
<v Speaker 1>and we'll also talk about the vaccines she saw you.

0:32:29.240 --> 0:32:31.560
<v Speaker 1>Thank you so much for joining us today. First of all,

0:32:31.600 --> 0:32:34.560
<v Speaker 1>it's a little bit counterintuitive. I know astro Zenica has

0:32:34.560 --> 0:32:36.680
<v Speaker 1>had some very good plans on Scope one, two and

0:32:36.720 --> 0:32:40.920
<v Speaker 1>also three, but it's counterintuitive to look at the medicine

0:32:40.920 --> 0:32:44.240
<v Speaker 1>industry and saying what you can do for sustainability Is

0:32:44.240 --> 0:32:47.320
<v Speaker 1>it all about drug disposal? How much cloud do you

0:32:47.360 --> 0:32:49.440
<v Speaker 1>think your industry has to actually make a real difference

0:32:49.440 --> 0:32:51.640
<v Speaker 1>to e s g. I've been ring France and then

0:32:51.720 --> 0:32:54.720
<v Speaker 1>thank you for having me the I think the pharmaceutical

0:32:54.800 --> 0:32:56.800
<v Speaker 1>industry and the heavy scares sector as a whole can

0:32:56.880 --> 0:32:59.960
<v Speaker 1>make a big impact. The heavy scares sector or globe

0:33:00.360 --> 0:33:02.920
<v Speaker 1>or presents about four percent of carbon emissions, so it's

0:33:03.000 --> 0:33:06.480
<v Speaker 1>quite substantial. And we can, of course as companies, work

0:33:06.520 --> 0:33:09.479
<v Speaker 1>on our own emissions, which you know as a company

0:33:09.520 --> 0:33:11.960
<v Speaker 1>we have a plan to do that by will be

0:33:12.480 --> 0:33:15.479
<v Speaker 1>carbon zero. From that view point, we can work on

0:33:15.520 --> 0:33:17.880
<v Speaker 1>our scopes three and our supply chain and we are

0:33:17.960 --> 0:33:20.880
<v Speaker 1>doing this as a company and I'm also working with

0:33:20.920 --> 0:33:23.000
<v Speaker 1>the rest of the industry to do that. And then

0:33:23.040 --> 0:33:25.960
<v Speaker 1>importantly we can work with the healthcare sector as a whole,

0:33:26.040 --> 0:33:28.440
<v Speaker 1>like the energys in the UK, to really make sure

0:33:28.480 --> 0:33:32.080
<v Speaker 1>we reduce carbon emissions across the entire sector. So I

0:33:32.080 --> 0:33:34.120
<v Speaker 1>guess the rest difficult thing is how do you dispose

0:33:34.160 --> 0:33:36.400
<v Speaker 1>in this? How do you dispose of it in a

0:33:36.440 --> 0:33:39.840
<v Speaker 1>safe way that's not damaging to the environment. How long

0:33:39.880 --> 0:33:42.280
<v Speaker 1>a way. Do we have to go until most medicine

0:33:42.360 --> 0:33:45.280
<v Speaker 1>ninety five percent of medicine or safe to dispose of? Well,

0:33:45.320 --> 0:33:47.360
<v Speaker 1>a lot of work is being done on this two.

0:33:47.720 --> 0:33:51.520
<v Speaker 1>But disposing of medicine is really a slightly different topic

0:33:51.560 --> 0:33:54.920
<v Speaker 1>compared to the carbon emission reduction we are committing to.

0:33:55.480 --> 0:33:58.240
<v Speaker 1>But a number of companies are really looking at how

0:33:58.240 --> 0:34:03.240
<v Speaker 1>do we actually recycle or dispose of our packaging of

0:34:03.280 --> 0:34:06.400
<v Speaker 1>our medicines and and recycle a lot of this in

0:34:06.400 --> 0:34:10.319
<v Speaker 1>in an environmentally friendly manner. Do you think that these

0:34:10.360 --> 0:34:13.440
<v Speaker 1>talks are we invigorating the infrasustainable? I mean, I mean

0:34:13.480 --> 0:34:16.120
<v Speaker 1>Curry here is very energizing, I have to say, because

0:34:16.200 --> 0:34:19.640
<v Speaker 1>I can sense the momentum is growing. Not only governments

0:34:19.680 --> 0:34:22.279
<v Speaker 1>are really making commitments, and I know that we would

0:34:22.320 --> 0:34:25.960
<v Speaker 1>always like to hear better, stronger commitments, but it goes

0:34:26.000 --> 0:34:29.000
<v Speaker 1>in their own the right direction. And importantly, the private

0:34:29.000 --> 0:34:31.279
<v Speaker 1>sector is not stepping up. Yeah, and now we need

0:34:31.320 --> 0:34:32.840
<v Speaker 1>to look at the details and where the money is

0:34:32.880 --> 0:34:35.239
<v Speaker 1>going and how you hold them accountable. But speaking of commitments,

0:34:35.239 --> 0:34:38.600
<v Speaker 1>what's your commitment to vaccines? Our commitment to vaccine is

0:34:38.640 --> 0:34:41.120
<v Speaker 1>really to bring this vaccine to as many people as

0:34:41.120 --> 0:34:44.080
<v Speaker 1>possible around the world, and so far we have delivered

0:34:44.120 --> 0:34:47.560
<v Speaker 1>one point at billion doses of vaccine globally, mostly to

0:34:47.600 --> 0:34:49.640
<v Speaker 1>the low medi on income countries, and so we are

0:34:49.719 --> 0:34:52.840
<v Speaker 1>very proud of this. Many people, thousands of people have

0:34:52.920 --> 0:34:55.560
<v Speaker 1>worked day and night over the last few months to

0:34:55.680 --> 0:34:58.480
<v Speaker 1>really deliver this vaccine that is making a huge difference

0:34:58.520 --> 0:35:01.279
<v Speaker 1>in many countries around the world. Which actually, what do

0:35:01.280 --> 0:35:04.200
<v Speaker 1>you make of the US of the new US pricing bill?

0:35:04.239 --> 0:35:06.759
<v Speaker 1>Actually in drugs, it seems to penalize some of the

0:35:06.800 --> 0:35:10.799
<v Speaker 1>smaller molecule drug development versus, for example, some of the biologics. Well,

0:35:10.920 --> 0:35:13.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, I mean we it was clear that something

0:35:13.600 --> 0:35:15.880
<v Speaker 1>has its clear something has to be done in the

0:35:15.960 --> 0:35:18.719
<v Speaker 1>United States to help patients get access to their medicine

0:35:19.280 --> 0:35:23.040
<v Speaker 1>at an affordable cost um. So we really welcome this

0:35:23.520 --> 0:35:28.439
<v Speaker 1>proposal to introduce a cap of two thousand dollar cap

0:35:28.680 --> 0:35:31.600
<v Speaker 1>of out of pocket costs for patients every year. That

0:35:31.680 --> 0:35:34.920
<v Speaker 1>will really help them take their medicine with that, you know,

0:35:35.200 --> 0:35:38.960
<v Speaker 1>the difficulties the face today, and we also understand that

0:35:39.080 --> 0:35:41.760
<v Speaker 1>something has to be done, and it's a negotiation between

0:35:41.800 --> 0:35:45.000
<v Speaker 1>industry and and all. The circle doesn't and I think

0:35:45.080 --> 0:35:48.319
<v Speaker 1>we we have to do this without destroying innovation, which

0:35:48.360 --> 0:35:50.560
<v Speaker 1>has been mostly in the US over the last number

0:35:50.560 --> 0:35:54.360
<v Speaker 1>of years. Actually, I believe that what the discussion is

0:35:54.400 --> 0:35:58.279
<v Speaker 1>going on today is really getting there. Actually, I understand

0:35:58.840 --> 0:36:01.560
<v Speaker 1>you know that the new bill so removes incentives to

0:36:01.760 --> 0:36:06.879
<v Speaker 1>test kids. What do you make about to test children? Um,

0:36:07.040 --> 0:36:08.799
<v Speaker 1>this I'm not aware of. I have to say I'm

0:36:08.840 --> 0:36:13.800
<v Speaker 1>sorry about this. But but the the discussion and the

0:36:14.400 --> 0:36:18.840
<v Speaker 1>decision that has been communicated overnight. Um, he's really balancing

0:36:18.920 --> 0:36:23.320
<v Speaker 1>quite well, reducing price, negotiating the price of sound drugs,

0:36:24.040 --> 0:36:27.520
<v Speaker 1>but at the same time protecting innovation. I mean, is

0:36:27.560 --> 0:36:29.279
<v Speaker 1>it you know, is there a danger that, because of

0:36:29.320 --> 0:36:31.600
<v Speaker 1>the pandemic, which I know has put really health at

0:36:31.600 --> 0:36:33.600
<v Speaker 1>the forefront, which means that a lot more people are

0:36:33.600 --> 0:36:37.560
<v Speaker 1>engaged with your industry, that as you're dealing with the pandemic,

0:36:37.719 --> 0:36:43.200
<v Speaker 1>it will not incentivize other companies, drug companies, healthcare companies

0:36:43.400 --> 0:36:47.120
<v Speaker 1>to decarbonize. Oh, I think the whole industry is actually

0:36:47.160 --> 0:36:50.920
<v Speaker 1>committed to committing not to the carbonizing. I you know,

0:36:50.960 --> 0:36:54.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm part of the task force within the SMI, the

0:36:54.480 --> 0:36:58.600
<v Speaker 1>Sustainable Market Initiatives launched by his oil hand as the

0:36:58.640 --> 0:37:02.000
<v Speaker 1>Prince child and as an industry we're working together to

0:37:02.120 --> 0:37:06.960
<v Speaker 1>the carbanas and reduce our carbon emissions in an accelerated manner.

0:37:07.000 --> 0:37:10.480
<v Speaker 1>So it's really quite exciting to see the pharmaceutical companies

0:37:10.480 --> 0:37:14.120
<v Speaker 1>coming together to work with our suppliers, but also to

0:37:14.160 --> 0:37:16.800
<v Speaker 1>work with and A, chess and other health scare systems

0:37:16.840 --> 0:37:19.239
<v Speaker 1>around the world so productively we can really reduce the

0:37:19.280 --> 0:37:22.440
<v Speaker 1>footprints you thanks so much for joining us. He is,

0:37:22.440 --> 0:37:28.839
<v Speaker 1>of course, the chief executive officer of astro Zeneca. Yeah,

0:37:31.040 --> 0:37:34.240
<v Speaker 1>another important story developing through the week over in Glasgow, Scotland.

0:37:34.320 --> 0:37:40.439
<v Speaker 1>Let's head back to catch up with Francine lay Friend. Hi, John,

0:37:40.480 --> 0:37:42.319
<v Speaker 1>Thank you so much for that. I'm delighted to be

0:37:42.360 --> 0:37:45.640
<v Speaker 1>joined by the President of Costa Rica, a President Alvarado,

0:37:45.680 --> 0:37:47.840
<v Speaker 1>to talk a little bit about his country, some of

0:37:47.840 --> 0:37:49.879
<v Speaker 1>the pledges here and of course what can be done

0:37:50.160 --> 0:37:52.480
<v Speaker 1>to save the planet. President, thanks so much for joining

0:37:52.560 --> 0:37:55.480
<v Speaker 1>us right here. Life on Bloomberg surveillance. Nearly a quarter

0:37:56.040 --> 0:37:59.120
<v Speaker 1>of your landmasses under some sort of conservation. You're doing

0:37:59.160 --> 0:38:03.239
<v Speaker 1>extremely well in terms of energy production electrifying into more

0:38:03.280 --> 0:38:08.640
<v Speaker 1>renewable sources. The big concern is transportation. About fifty of

0:38:08.640 --> 0:38:11.640
<v Speaker 1>your emissions come from transportation. That is still dirty. How

0:38:11.640 --> 0:38:14.359
<v Speaker 1>can you make it cleaner? Well, thanks for the opportunity.

0:38:14.440 --> 0:38:17.319
<v Speaker 1>It's a pleasure being with you in Bloomberg. Well, it's

0:38:17.360 --> 0:38:20.799
<v Speaker 1>true that our main fund print and falsil carbon fruit

0:38:20.840 --> 0:38:26.560
<v Speaker 1>print console transportation. Our electric grid. The electricity we produces

0:38:26.640 --> 0:38:32.160
<v Speaker 1>nine clean and renewable. So our great opportunity is to

0:38:32.360 --> 0:38:36.880
<v Speaker 1>electrify our transportation. So far, what we have done we

0:38:36.960 --> 0:38:40.040
<v Speaker 1>have increased the number of electric vehicles in Costa Rica.

0:38:40.120 --> 0:38:42.680
<v Speaker 1>We are the we have the highest per capita number

0:38:42.680 --> 0:38:46.520
<v Speaker 1>of vehicles electric vehicles in the region. That's one and

0:38:46.600 --> 0:38:49.920
<v Speaker 1>for that we have a tax relief on electric vehicles

0:38:50.120 --> 0:38:53.920
<v Speaker 1>and also we multiply the stations to charge vehicles so

0:38:54.000 --> 0:38:57.560
<v Speaker 1>you can go all across the country. Second, mass transportation,

0:38:57.640 --> 0:39:01.200
<v Speaker 1>we're building an electric train for are the main cities

0:39:01.239 --> 0:39:03.920
<v Speaker 1>eighty it's a project of eighty two kilometers and it's

0:39:03.960 --> 0:39:08.880
<v Speaker 1>also an electric train from clean electricity. What kind of

0:39:08.920 --> 0:39:11.360
<v Speaker 1>timeline can we actually see a meaningful difference? And we

0:39:11.400 --> 0:39:13.560
<v Speaker 1>look at the cars, what's selling? What do people want

0:39:13.600 --> 0:39:19.680
<v Speaker 1>to buy? Well, our timeline we launch it by February.

0:39:19.719 --> 0:39:22.440
<v Speaker 1>We were the first to launch our decarbranization plan and

0:39:22.520 --> 0:39:26.360
<v Speaker 1>we have a pathway from now to twenty fifty, but

0:39:26.480 --> 0:39:29.960
<v Speaker 1>by twenty thirty, we have to see a strong progress

0:39:30.239 --> 0:39:35.000
<v Speaker 1>in the electrification of our transportation to dramatically reduce our

0:39:35.080 --> 0:39:37.960
<v Speaker 1>carbon footprint. And that's what we are I mean also

0:39:38.400 --> 0:39:42.440
<v Speaker 1>with new schemes of public transportation, because we're not only

0:39:42.640 --> 0:39:46.920
<v Speaker 1>targeting to private vehicles but also public transportation to cleaner,

0:39:47.000 --> 0:39:49.479
<v Speaker 1>more efficient. The person talking to a little bit about

0:39:49.480 --> 0:39:51.360
<v Speaker 1>carbon market, First of all, are you pushing for some

0:39:51.440 --> 0:39:54.400
<v Speaker 1>kind of carbon markets offset? That will happen very quickly.

0:39:54.680 --> 0:39:57.440
<v Speaker 1>I know Panama is getting involved in carbon you know

0:39:57.480 --> 0:39:59.600
<v Speaker 1>we're going to have a price for carbon. Well, that's

0:39:59.640 --> 0:40:01.920
<v Speaker 1>one of the big discussions, and actually that's the discussion

0:40:01.960 --> 0:40:05.480
<v Speaker 1>our Article six that's going on in the negotiations during

0:40:05.880 --> 0:40:09.200
<v Speaker 1>this cup. Yes, we're pushing for that, but I think

0:40:09.239 --> 0:40:11.840
<v Speaker 1>one of the great discussions has to do with first

0:40:11.840 --> 0:40:14.759
<v Speaker 1>with trust, trust in the developing word that we're going

0:40:14.800 --> 0:40:17.680
<v Speaker 1>to implement the measures, and also trust from the developers

0:40:17.680 --> 0:40:22.120
<v Speaker 1>that they're going to commit finance, both public and private.

0:40:22.440 --> 0:40:25.799
<v Speaker 1>We have seen advancements and we have seen schemes, but

0:40:25.840 --> 0:40:27.880
<v Speaker 1>there are still too frial. I was gonna say, have

0:40:28.120 --> 0:40:30.399
<v Speaker 1>you seen enough? I mean, it's a billion enough yet?

0:40:30.640 --> 0:40:32.840
<v Speaker 1>Right when will we see it, and how much pressure

0:40:32.840 --> 0:40:34.799
<v Speaker 1>are you putting on some of the developing would be

0:40:35.120 --> 0:40:38.719
<v Speaker 1>we're being very open. I mean whenever I address the

0:40:38.760 --> 0:40:41.160
<v Speaker 1>floor a couple of times that I've done, I've been

0:40:41.400 --> 0:40:46.719
<v Speaker 1>very open and frank, because you see, there's the discussion

0:40:46.760 --> 0:40:51.000
<v Speaker 1>of the development countries are too risky. But here the

0:40:51.080 --> 0:40:54.080
<v Speaker 1>only risk I see is that if we don't act there,

0:40:54.120 --> 0:40:57.400
<v Speaker 1>there won't be any planet anymore. So I don't see

0:40:57.440 --> 0:41:00.799
<v Speaker 1>any risk higher than that. One risk is a matter

0:41:00.920 --> 0:41:04.520
<v Speaker 1>of u S measure also in time and framingess. And

0:41:04.640 --> 0:41:06.400
<v Speaker 1>you feel cheated by some of the top of metters.

0:41:06.440 --> 0:41:09.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean they also come from the developments of the word.

0:41:09.280 --> 0:41:12.960
<v Speaker 1>I think we need to to go further in our commitments.

0:41:13.000 --> 0:41:18.680
<v Speaker 1>I am confident because as as as humanity, I am optimistic.

0:41:19.040 --> 0:41:20.960
<v Speaker 1>How must the meat on the table to be sure

0:41:21.000 --> 0:41:23.439
<v Speaker 1>to implement some of the strategies that you have from

0:41:23.480 --> 0:41:27.640
<v Speaker 1>developed economies? Well, for example, through our policies like the

0:41:27.680 --> 0:41:32.120
<v Speaker 1>Hambition Coalition Forever Nature that is pushing to preserve thirty

0:41:32.160 --> 0:41:35.160
<v Speaker 1>percent of oceans and forty percent of lands. So far

0:41:35.280 --> 0:41:39.759
<v Speaker 1>we have we have we have gathered the support of

0:41:39.880 --> 0:41:47.320
<v Speaker 1>five billion dollars through philanthropy and that's a great start. Yesterday, Colombia, Ecuador,

0:41:47.440 --> 0:41:51.440
<v Speaker 1>Panama and Costa Rica were together announced the Protection of

0:41:51.480 --> 0:41:53.520
<v Speaker 1>our Oceans area, which is going to be one of

0:41:53.560 --> 0:41:56.000
<v Speaker 1>the largest in the Pacific and that support there also

0:41:56.040 --> 0:41:59.680
<v Speaker 1>by philanthropy and by all the contributors. We're in conversation

0:41:59.719 --> 0:42:02.600
<v Speaker 1>with the resident of Costa Rica when you look at

0:42:02.680 --> 0:42:04.400
<v Speaker 1>some of the things that have been on the table

0:42:04.400 --> 0:42:06.239
<v Speaker 1>and what more can we you know, can be done.

0:42:06.480 --> 0:42:09.640
<v Speaker 1>You're still dealing with a pandemic. Costa Rica is an

0:42:09.640 --> 0:42:13.040
<v Speaker 1>open economy. The pandemic and COVID nineteen is not out

0:42:13.040 --> 0:42:16.840
<v Speaker 1>of control. Is there danger that it derails you and

0:42:16.920 --> 0:42:20.400
<v Speaker 1>other countries actually in developing economies from reaching some of

0:42:20.400 --> 0:42:23.680
<v Speaker 1>the sustainability targets. Well, that's one of the great risks.

0:42:24.440 --> 0:42:29.160
<v Speaker 1>In our case. We have for the objective population twelve

0:42:30.080 --> 0:42:34.080
<v Speaker 1>age and older, we have more than eight eighty six

0:42:34.080 --> 0:42:36.520
<v Speaker 1>percent of a population with at least one doses, more

0:42:36.560 --> 0:42:40.040
<v Speaker 1>than sixty with two doses. So we have advanced in

0:42:40.080 --> 0:42:43.200
<v Speaker 1>that direction. But the fact, for example, that Africa's has

0:42:43.239 --> 0:42:45.960
<v Speaker 1>just five percent of people backs in it is a

0:42:46.000 --> 0:42:49.280
<v Speaker 1>great risk, not for Africa, for the rest of the world.

0:42:50.000 --> 0:42:52.000
<v Speaker 1>So then we need to tackle that because a new

0:42:52.080 --> 0:42:56.120
<v Speaker 1>variant can take us to the beginning. So we need

0:42:56.160 --> 0:42:59.120
<v Speaker 1>to tackle that second grade risk. And this is for

0:42:59.200 --> 0:43:02.360
<v Speaker 1>emergent economy, miss for the developing world, for Latin American

0:43:02.440 --> 0:43:05.480
<v Speaker 1>and the Caribbean. We've seen an increase on our fiscal

0:43:05.600 --> 0:43:09.640
<v Speaker 1>deficits because we have to increase expenditure to tackle the pandemic,

0:43:09.960 --> 0:43:15.280
<v Speaker 1>also increase expenditure to tackle climate change. Extreme weathers demand

0:43:15.360 --> 0:43:19.480
<v Speaker 1>governments to invest in emergencies, for example, and at the

0:43:19.480 --> 0:43:23.000
<v Speaker 1>same time do pandemic. We have seen a decrease on

0:43:23.120 --> 0:43:26.759
<v Speaker 1>the taxes we collect and those fiscal deficits are a

0:43:26.800 --> 0:43:29.600
<v Speaker 1>new risk that we face. We are facing a dead

0:43:29.760 --> 0:43:32.319
<v Speaker 1>risk throughout the region. All right, thank you so much.

0:43:32.360 --> 0:43:34.480
<v Speaker 1>Is it nice being back in then here? You studied here, Yes,

0:43:34.520 --> 0:43:37.600
<v Speaker 1>studied here. No, it's great. The only thing I didn't

0:43:37.640 --> 0:43:40.920
<v Speaker 1>miss is how cold it is. But I know it is.

0:43:41.160 --> 0:43:43.800
<v Speaker 1>It's freezing in Glasgow. Thank you so much. The President

0:43:44.239 --> 0:43:46.040
<v Speaker 1>of Costa Rica. With that time, I'm going to hand

0:43:46.080 --> 0:43:48.920
<v Speaker 1>it back to you. In New York, I imagine it's warmer.

0:43:49.320 --> 0:43:51.319
<v Speaker 1>I'm I'm not sure. Here it is pretty cool even

0:43:51.320 --> 0:43:53.640
<v Speaker 1>in the Congress Center France, saying I did not miss

0:43:53.640 --> 0:43:55.880
<v Speaker 1>the weather dint I miss you, I don't miss the

0:43:55.880 --> 0:43:59.279
<v Speaker 1>weather France, saying thank you very much from Glasgowscon. This

0:43:59.360 --> 0:44:03.160
<v Speaker 1>is the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. Thanks for listening. Join us

0:44:03.200 --> 0:44:06.960
<v Speaker 1>live weekdays from seven to ten am Eastern on Bloomberg

0:44:07.040 --> 0:44:10.880
<v Speaker 1>Radio and on Bloomberg Television each day from six to

0:44:11.040 --> 0:44:15.680
<v Speaker 1>nine am for insight from the best in economics, finance, investment,

0:44:15.800 --> 0:44:20.840
<v Speaker 1>and international relations. And subscribe to the Surveillance podcast on

0:44:20.920 --> 0:44:24.719
<v Speaker 1>Apple podcast, SoundCloud, Bloomberg dot com, and of course on

0:44:24.840 --> 0:44:29.040
<v Speaker 1>the terminal. I'm Tom keene In. This is Bloomberg