WEBVTT - Bengals Booth Podcast: Thinking Out Loud

0:00:03.520 --> 0:00:06.439
<v Speaker 1>I get everybody. I'm Dan Horde and thanks for downloading

0:00:06.440 --> 0:00:13.320
<v Speaker 1>the Bengals Booth podcast. The I'm Thinking out Loud addition,

0:00:14.000 --> 0:00:17.400
<v Speaker 1>as Anthony Tresh from Pro Football Focus shares his thoughts

0:00:17.400 --> 0:00:20.520
<v Speaker 1>and what the Bengal should do in free agency and

0:00:20.720 --> 0:00:23.439
<v Speaker 1>the draft, and I'll give you a little teaser his

0:00:23.640 --> 0:00:28.280
<v Speaker 1>plan does not include piney Sewell then after that, It's

0:00:28.360 --> 0:00:31.960
<v Speaker 1>something I've done before when hosting radio shows on WLW

0:00:32.000 --> 0:00:35.720
<v Speaker 1>called story Time with Dan, as I share an anecdote

0:00:35.720 --> 0:00:39.640
<v Speaker 1>for my broadcasting career, in this case a story involving

0:00:39.640 --> 0:00:43.000
<v Speaker 1>a Pro Football Hall of Famer who nearly caused me

0:00:43.560 --> 0:00:47.720
<v Speaker 1>to freeze to death. The Bengals Booth Podcast is presented

0:00:47.720 --> 0:00:51.960
<v Speaker 1>by bud Light. Seltzer Refreshed the Game. Here's a quick

0:00:51.960 --> 0:00:54.600
<v Speaker 1>reminder that you can have the latest edition of this

0:00:54.680 --> 0:00:58.279
<v Speaker 1>podcast delivered right to your phone, tablet, or computer by

0:00:58.360 --> 0:01:02.960
<v Speaker 1>subscribing on Itune, Stitcher, Google Play, Spotify, or pod Bean.

0:01:03.440 --> 0:01:08.919
<v Speaker 1>It's the greatest thing since custom made wall calendars. For years,

0:01:08.959 --> 0:01:12.160
<v Speaker 1>one of my sisters has been making personalized monthly wall

0:01:12.200 --> 0:01:16.600
<v Speaker 1>calendars through the online photography company shutterfly dot com. You

0:01:16.720 --> 0:01:20.360
<v Speaker 1>basically share family photos with Shutterfly and they will make

0:01:20.400 --> 0:01:23.760
<v Speaker 1>a very slick looking wall calendar. You can do so

0:01:23.920 --> 0:01:27.039
<v Speaker 1>right now for less than twenty bucks. I recently had

0:01:27.080 --> 0:01:29.959
<v Speaker 1>one made that hangs in our kitchen and we love it.

0:01:30.600 --> 0:01:33.600
<v Speaker 1>So whether you are looking for a gift idea for

0:01:33.640 --> 0:01:36.120
<v Speaker 1>the grandparents who or just want to showcase some of

0:01:36.120 --> 0:01:40.080
<v Speaker 1>your favorite family photos, I highly recommend a custom made

0:01:40.120 --> 0:01:46.000
<v Speaker 1>wall calendar through shutterfly dot com. Now let's get to football.

0:01:46.800 --> 0:01:49.480
<v Speaker 1>These days, it seems that everybody with access to the

0:01:49.520 --> 0:01:53.600
<v Speaker 1>Internet puts out a mock draft, and chances are you

0:01:53.680 --> 0:01:55.760
<v Speaker 1>already have a player that you would like to see

0:01:55.760 --> 0:02:00.320
<v Speaker 1>the Bengal select number five overall. But forty three days

0:02:00.320 --> 0:02:03.880
<v Speaker 1>before the draft, the official start of free agency begins.

0:02:04.400 --> 0:02:08.000
<v Speaker 1>That's a little more than a month away March seventeenth,

0:02:08.040 --> 0:02:10.520
<v Speaker 1>and this week I reached out to Anthony Tresh from

0:02:10.520 --> 0:02:14.200
<v Speaker 1>Pro Football Focus dot com, who has strong opinions on

0:02:14.240 --> 0:02:20.119
<v Speaker 1>who the Bengal should sign, draft and not draft. Anthony,

0:02:20.200 --> 0:02:22.600
<v Speaker 1>you have written some interesting things about the Bengals in

0:02:22.639 --> 0:02:24.680
<v Speaker 1>recent weeks, and we are going to cover some of

0:02:24.680 --> 0:02:29.320
<v Speaker 1>those today, beginning with the comprehensive free agency preview that

0:02:29.440 --> 0:02:31.919
<v Speaker 1>you published at the beginning of this week for all

0:02:32.000 --> 0:02:35.560
<v Speaker 1>thirty two NFL teams, including top target in free agency,

0:02:35.680 --> 0:02:40.040
<v Speaker 1>potential cuts, team needs, and your plan of action. I'm

0:02:40.080 --> 0:02:44.360
<v Speaker 1>going to begin by quoting you. You wrote, as great

0:02:44.360 --> 0:02:47.560
<v Speaker 1>of a prospect as Piney Sewell is, he should not

0:02:47.840 --> 0:02:53.160
<v Speaker 1>be in the Bengals plans this offseason. So Bengals fans,

0:02:53.200 --> 0:02:56.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure would like you to explain why. Yeah, I mean,

0:02:56.160 --> 0:02:58.240
<v Speaker 1>this is going to be a popular debate between now

0:02:58.240 --> 0:03:00.040
<v Speaker 1>and April. I mean we've already had it with a

0:03:00.040 --> 0:03:02.760
<v Speaker 1>lot of Bengals fans. But you know myself and a

0:03:02.800 --> 0:03:05.040
<v Speaker 1>lot of my colleagues here at PFF view that you

0:03:05.040 --> 0:03:07.280
<v Speaker 1>know the Cincinnati Bengals they have the cap space to

0:03:07.320 --> 0:03:09.840
<v Speaker 1>attack free agency in offensive line. I mean, there's some

0:03:09.919 --> 0:03:11.920
<v Speaker 1>quality offensive linemen out there that not a lot of

0:03:11.919 --> 0:03:14.600
<v Speaker 1>teams can afford because the cap, the salary cap is

0:03:14.639 --> 0:03:16.520
<v Speaker 1>probably gonna go down around ten to twenty million when

0:03:16.520 --> 0:03:18.720
<v Speaker 1>it's usually going up ten million. So there's a lot

0:03:18.760 --> 0:03:21.120
<v Speaker 1>of teams in a bad situation with the Bengals are

0:03:21.160 --> 0:03:23.240
<v Speaker 1>not one of them. They can afford these offensive linemen

0:03:23.400 --> 0:03:25.640
<v Speaker 1>and they're going to get quality play right away. And

0:03:25.639 --> 0:03:27.560
<v Speaker 1>then when you look at the NFL Draft and where

0:03:27.560 --> 0:03:30.280
<v Speaker 1>they're positioned. Penny School I mean, he's as sure as

0:03:30.280 --> 0:03:32.760
<v Speaker 1>a bet as they possibly are. But you look at

0:03:32.800 --> 0:03:35.680
<v Speaker 1>guys like Jamar Chase, who you know, we believe might

0:03:35.720 --> 0:03:38.040
<v Speaker 1>be the best non quarterback prospect you've ever seen in

0:03:38.040 --> 0:03:41.800
<v Speaker 1>that Chase Young type of category. From a wide receiver perspective,

0:03:42.080 --> 0:03:45.120
<v Speaker 1>he's up there with Amari Cooper, Julio Jones. I mean,

0:03:45.120 --> 0:03:46.960
<v Speaker 1>this guy has a chance to be an elite wide

0:03:46.960 --> 0:03:49.400
<v Speaker 1>receiver number one. And when you look at the Bengals

0:03:49.400 --> 0:03:52.080
<v Speaker 1>receiving unit, you know, Tee Higgins and Tyler Boyd they're great,

0:03:52.240 --> 0:03:55.280
<v Speaker 1>but they're more complimentary pieces. They're neither of them are

0:03:55.280 --> 0:03:57.960
<v Speaker 1>really going to be that elite wide receiver one. You know,

0:03:58.040 --> 0:04:00.760
<v Speaker 1>Jamar Chase has potential to do that. DeVonta Smith has

0:04:00.760 --> 0:04:03.160
<v Speaker 1>its potential to do that. Gamen Wattle does too. You know,

0:04:03.240 --> 0:04:05.200
<v Speaker 1>in all three of those guys are gonna one of them,

0:04:05.240 --> 0:04:08.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean, some form of those three will be the

0:04:08.280 --> 0:04:11.520
<v Speaker 1>available to Cincinnati at the fifth overall pick. And you

0:04:11.560 --> 0:04:13.920
<v Speaker 1>know they really should take one of those wide receivers

0:04:13.920 --> 0:04:15.800
<v Speaker 1>over Pinna soool. I mean, when you look at the

0:04:15.840 --> 0:04:19.760
<v Speaker 1>positional value, wide receivers just far more important than offensive

0:04:19.800 --> 0:04:22.640
<v Speaker 1>tackle in you know, like I said, Cincinnati really does

0:04:22.720 --> 0:04:24.640
<v Speaker 1>have the funds to make some moves. Whether it's a

0:04:24.680 --> 0:04:27.279
<v Speaker 1>guy like Taylor Moton the right tackle to Carolina, or

0:04:27.360 --> 0:04:29.880
<v Speaker 1>Joe Fiuniy a guard from New England. They can make

0:04:29.880 --> 0:04:31.560
<v Speaker 1>some power plays in free agency, and we think we

0:04:31.560 --> 0:04:33.920
<v Speaker 1>should They should do that at offensive line and then

0:04:33.960 --> 0:04:36.680
<v Speaker 1>go wide receiver in the NFL Draft. We're talking to

0:04:36.839 --> 0:04:41.480
<v Speaker 1>Anthony Trash from Pro Football Focus. Should they prioritize tackle

0:04:42.080 --> 0:04:45.960
<v Speaker 1>or guard if they do dive into free agency. I think,

0:04:46.000 --> 0:04:47.919
<v Speaker 1>you know, the best option out there for them that

0:04:47.920 --> 0:04:50.440
<v Speaker 1>they can really afford would be Joe Funi. And you know,

0:04:50.480 --> 0:04:51.960
<v Speaker 1>it's going to be interesting to see what kind of

0:04:52.000 --> 0:04:54.799
<v Speaker 1>direction the New England Patriots kind of go in this offseason,

0:04:54.839 --> 0:04:57.039
<v Speaker 1>just because you know they're kind of flirting with going

0:04:57.040 --> 0:04:59.760
<v Speaker 1>into that quarterback purgatory realm that they do go that

0:05:00.000 --> 0:05:02.039
<v Speaker 1>to run round. I think they should kind of liquidate

0:05:02.040 --> 0:05:04.080
<v Speaker 1>their assets and kind of let everything go there. So

0:05:04.360 --> 0:05:06.279
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think they have the chance to kind

0:05:06.279 --> 0:05:08.240
<v Speaker 1>of outbid New England and you know, get him in

0:05:08.240 --> 0:05:11.560
<v Speaker 1>an uncomfortable spot and land Joe Tuni. But also, like

0:05:11.560 --> 0:05:15.000
<v Speaker 1>I said, Taylor Moton, he's another good option at tackle,

0:05:15.560 --> 0:05:18.880
<v Speaker 1>So I don't don't think there's really a priority there.

0:05:18.880 --> 0:05:20.720
<v Speaker 1>But I think out of all of the offensive line

0:05:20.760 --> 0:05:23.360
<v Speaker 1>that that's available, I think Funy if he does hit

0:05:23.400 --> 0:05:25.599
<v Speaker 1>the open market, I think that should probably be the

0:05:25.640 --> 0:05:28.040
<v Speaker 1>top priority because he is part away the best player

0:05:28.240 --> 0:05:32.440
<v Speaker 1>at his respective position that'll probably be available for him.

0:05:32.760 --> 0:05:37.080
<v Speaker 1>So in a previous podcast, I had mentioned Brandon Schurf

0:05:37.480 --> 0:05:41.120
<v Speaker 1>is a possibility at guard. In your article about free agency,

0:05:41.240 --> 0:05:44.480
<v Speaker 1>you brought up Darryl Williams as a possibility at tackle.

0:05:45.000 --> 0:05:47.880
<v Speaker 1>What about those guys? I would have loved to put

0:05:47.880 --> 0:05:50.440
<v Speaker 1>Brandon Schurf in there, but I think he's more likely

0:05:50.480 --> 0:05:53.039
<v Speaker 1>than not going to get paid by the Washington football team.

0:05:53.080 --> 0:05:54.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean, they have a lot of cap space available

0:05:54.680 --> 0:05:56.680
<v Speaker 1>to him, so I do think that's what's going to

0:05:56.760 --> 0:05:58.800
<v Speaker 1>end up happening. The same with like Trip Williams. Even

0:05:58.839 --> 0:06:01.480
<v Speaker 1>though they have Joe and Williams a tackle, He's probably

0:06:01.480 --> 0:06:03.880
<v Speaker 1>gonna get paid by San Francisco. So I mean we're

0:06:03.920 --> 0:06:05.720
<v Speaker 1>just kind of, you know, kind of weeding out some

0:06:05.760 --> 0:06:08.000
<v Speaker 1>of these guys there. Darryl Williams, I think he's kind

0:06:08.040 --> 0:06:11.719
<v Speaker 1>of a less than ideal option at tackle just because

0:06:11.760 --> 0:06:13.799
<v Speaker 1>of what we you know, he was great this past season,

0:06:13.800 --> 0:06:16.320
<v Speaker 1>but in the years past not so much. So you know,

0:06:16.440 --> 0:06:19.000
<v Speaker 1>I think, you know, if they can really get Taylor

0:06:19.040 --> 0:06:20.960
<v Speaker 1>Moton and Joe Theory, I mean, those are the top two,

0:06:21.240 --> 0:06:23.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, that's the top guard and tackle likely to

0:06:23.320 --> 0:06:26.000
<v Speaker 1>hit the open market, with Schurf and Trent Williams not there,

0:06:26.040 --> 0:06:28.800
<v Speaker 1>so I think those would be their best case scenarios.

0:06:29.760 --> 0:06:33.360
<v Speaker 1>After that, you know, it would be Darryl Williams at tackle.

0:06:33.400 --> 0:06:35.840
<v Speaker 1>And then when we're talking offensive guards, man, it gets

0:06:35.960 --> 0:06:38.880
<v Speaker 1>really really weak. You know, you had Matt Fyler there,

0:06:38.920 --> 0:06:41.440
<v Speaker 1>who has you know, experienced playing tackle and guard. But

0:06:41.480 --> 0:06:43.680
<v Speaker 1>even after that, I mean, we're looking at possible guys

0:06:43.680 --> 0:06:46.240
<v Speaker 1>like Jermaine Effettie, and we all know how inconsistent he

0:06:46.320 --> 0:06:48.560
<v Speaker 1>has been throughout his NFL career. So I mean, they

0:06:48.640 --> 0:06:51.400
<v Speaker 1>really should be hoping that a guy like Joe Dooney

0:06:51.480 --> 0:06:53.360
<v Speaker 1>hits the open market and then just throw the bag

0:06:53.360 --> 0:06:55.799
<v Speaker 1>at him because he's that's about the only quality option

0:06:55.880 --> 0:06:58.760
<v Speaker 1>they really have. We're talking to Anthony Trash from Pro

0:06:58.800 --> 0:07:01.520
<v Speaker 1>Football Focus. You can all them on Twitter at p

0:07:01.920 --> 0:07:07.120
<v Speaker 1>f F Underscore. Anthony. You also cover internal free agents

0:07:07.160 --> 0:07:09.880
<v Speaker 1>and your free agency guy. The Bengals have several the

0:07:09.960 --> 0:07:13.120
<v Speaker 1>top two guys on the list are undoubtedly will Jackson

0:07:13.160 --> 0:07:16.760
<v Speaker 1>and Carl Lawson. Who should the priority be? And it

0:07:16.760 --> 0:07:19.800
<v Speaker 1>has to be William Jackson just because of the positional value.

0:07:19.840 --> 0:07:22.320
<v Speaker 1>And you know, I love Lawson. I think he's a

0:07:22.440 --> 0:07:24.440
<v Speaker 1>very good passenger. I mean he had you know, he's

0:07:24.600 --> 0:07:26.800
<v Speaker 1>almost a top ten pastor which are actually this past

0:07:26.880 --> 0:07:29.880
<v Speaker 1>year when when you look at our wins upove replacement metric,

0:07:29.920 --> 0:07:32.120
<v Speaker 1>which is a very popular win in baseball, and our

0:07:32.240 --> 0:07:34.480
<v Speaker 1>data scientists, you know, they put their heads down, they

0:07:34.560 --> 0:07:36.440
<v Speaker 1>grinded out this formula and they came up with it.

0:07:36.480 --> 0:07:37.920
<v Speaker 1>And props to him because it's one of the best

0:07:37.920 --> 0:07:39.920
<v Speaker 1>things I've ever seen someone do that I worked with,

0:07:40.520 --> 0:07:43.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, a kind of measures positional value. We've really

0:07:43.040 --> 0:07:45.280
<v Speaker 1>found out some very interesting things with this. And you know,

0:07:45.320 --> 0:07:47.800
<v Speaker 1>in the case of William Jackson versus Carl Lawson this

0:07:47.840 --> 0:07:51.440
<v Speaker 1>past season, both players had great years, but William Jackson

0:07:51.560 --> 0:07:54.200
<v Speaker 1>generated two and a half times more wins upove replacement.

0:07:54.320 --> 0:07:56.480
<v Speaker 1>Think Carl Lawson, did you know it's just all about

0:07:56.600 --> 0:07:59.680
<v Speaker 1>coverage being more important than pass Russian I think you

0:07:59.680 --> 0:08:01.920
<v Speaker 1>know that what they really need to prioritize here, so

0:08:02.160 --> 0:08:04.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, when they're looking who to resign, you know,

0:08:04.120 --> 0:08:06.120
<v Speaker 1>I think they need to go after William Jackson and

0:08:06.240 --> 0:08:09.680
<v Speaker 1>prioritize that over Carl Lawson, and then after I think

0:08:09.680 --> 0:08:12.280
<v Speaker 1>even before they look at Carl Lawson, they really need

0:08:12.280 --> 0:08:14.720
<v Speaker 1>to address the slot corners be just because, you know,

0:08:15.040 --> 0:08:17.640
<v Speaker 1>but it's interesting, just because you know, there's a lot

0:08:17.640 --> 0:08:20.240
<v Speaker 1>of available slot corners on the open market, but they're

0:08:20.240 --> 0:08:22.760
<v Speaker 1>only going to get contracts, you know, annually worth about

0:08:22.800 --> 0:08:25.480
<v Speaker 1>four to five you know million per year, even though

0:08:25.520 --> 0:08:27.440
<v Speaker 1>they're one of the most valuable positions on the field.

0:08:27.440 --> 0:08:29.480
<v Speaker 1>There's a lot of talented ones on the open market

0:08:29.680 --> 0:08:31.440
<v Speaker 1>and they can get a pretty good one too for

0:08:31.480 --> 0:08:33.520
<v Speaker 1>a very decent price. So, you know, I think those

0:08:33.520 --> 0:08:35.319
<v Speaker 1>are the kind of the two avenues they need to

0:08:35.360 --> 0:08:37.319
<v Speaker 1>go down before they even think about Carl Lawson as

0:08:37.400 --> 0:08:39.200
<v Speaker 1>much of a you know, a great player he is.

0:08:39.880 --> 0:08:43.160
<v Speaker 1>Give us some slot corner names. First one that comes

0:08:43.160 --> 0:08:45.480
<v Speaker 1>to mind, Desmond King, you know, Troy Hill of the

0:08:45.520 --> 0:08:48.040
<v Speaker 1>Los Angeles Rams. I mean, these guys are out there too,

0:08:48.080 --> 0:08:51.079
<v Speaker 1>you know, McKinsey, Alexander, you know, he's not a bad option.

0:08:51.240 --> 0:08:53.920
<v Speaker 1>You know, the LB. I think it's somewhere around of

0:08:54.040 --> 0:08:58.199
<v Speaker 1>the top eleven highest grade slot corners and coverage over

0:08:58.200 --> 0:09:00.720
<v Speaker 1>the last two seasons. Seven of those eleven are on

0:09:00.760 --> 0:09:02.960
<v Speaker 1>the open market this season. You know, Troy Hill, Like

0:09:02.960 --> 0:09:06.240
<v Speaker 1>I said, Desmond King, you know, they have Kawan Williams

0:09:06.280 --> 0:09:08.760
<v Speaker 1>as San Francisco corner too. I mean, there's gonna be

0:09:08.760 --> 0:09:10.360
<v Speaker 1>a lot of them available, and a lot of these

0:09:10.360 --> 0:09:12.440
<v Speaker 1>teams can't afford them. You know, the Pittsburgh Steelers too,

0:09:12.440 --> 0:09:15.240
<v Speaker 1>with Mike Hilton Kim Sutton. There's going to be a

0:09:15.360 --> 0:09:17.280
<v Speaker 1>very good market for these guys, and I think they're

0:09:17.280 --> 0:09:19.240
<v Speaker 1>gonna be able to land a good one, just whether

0:09:19.320 --> 0:09:22.240
<v Speaker 1>or not they kind of capitalize on the opportunity. We're

0:09:22.280 --> 0:09:25.360
<v Speaker 1>talking to Anthony Trash from Pro Football Focus. You listed

0:09:25.400 --> 0:09:29.200
<v Speaker 1>as their top two priorities in your guide offensive line

0:09:29.200 --> 0:09:32.600
<v Speaker 1>and cornerback, and based on your Will Jackson versus Kyral

0:09:32.720 --> 0:09:36.000
<v Speaker 1>Lawson decision, I guess I can understand why you didn't

0:09:36.040 --> 0:09:39.720
<v Speaker 1>have defensive line listed as well. To me though, that

0:09:39.880 --> 0:09:42.280
<v Speaker 1>deserves to be right up there. Can they help themselves

0:09:42.280 --> 0:09:45.640
<v Speaker 1>in free agency, Yeah, I mean they certainly can, but

0:09:46.000 --> 0:09:48.720
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it's you know, a pressing need like

0:09:48.920 --> 0:09:52.680
<v Speaker 1>offensive lining corner is for them, just like I said,

0:09:52.720 --> 0:09:54.800
<v Speaker 1>because of the positional value thing with it too, and

0:09:54.840 --> 0:09:57.600
<v Speaker 1>I would even put corner in, even wide receiver up

0:09:57.640 --> 0:10:00.320
<v Speaker 1>there ahead of offensive line. You know, even though, of

0:10:00.320 --> 0:10:02.080
<v Speaker 1>course the Bengals offensive line was one of the worst

0:10:02.080 --> 0:10:04.160
<v Speaker 1>in the NFL last season. You know, they do have

0:10:04.200 --> 0:10:06.520
<v Speaker 1>two good pieces there with Jonah Williams and Trey Hopkins.

0:10:06.679 --> 0:10:08.440
<v Speaker 1>You know, if they make those couple of moves in

0:10:08.480 --> 0:10:10.640
<v Speaker 1>free agency like they can, you know, I think they

0:10:10.640 --> 0:10:13.440
<v Speaker 1>can have a pretty good lineup set up, you know,

0:10:13.440 --> 0:10:15.800
<v Speaker 1>for the twenty twenty one season without pain a school.

0:10:16.440 --> 0:10:18.720
<v Speaker 1>But you know, the past rush maybe needs a little

0:10:18.720 --> 0:10:21.280
<v Speaker 1>bit of help, especially if they can't bring back Coral Lawson,

0:10:21.480 --> 0:10:23.439
<v Speaker 1>which I think they're going to end up doing anyway.

0:10:24.200 --> 0:10:25.760
<v Speaker 1>You know, I still think, you know, you got to

0:10:25.760 --> 0:10:28.160
<v Speaker 1>attack the most important valuable positions and then kind of

0:10:28.160 --> 0:10:31.880
<v Speaker 1>fill in after the fact in the attack the less

0:10:31.920 --> 0:10:34.560
<v Speaker 1>valuable positions, you know, and get to that kind of

0:10:34.679 --> 0:10:37.200
<v Speaker 1>contingent status. But I don't think they're quite there yet.

0:10:37.960 --> 0:10:40.520
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's turn to the draft with Anthony Trash

0:10:40.520 --> 0:10:44.560
<v Speaker 1>from Pro Football Focus. Jamar Chase is the ideal guy

0:10:44.679 --> 0:10:47.920
<v Speaker 1>in your opinion. Let's say he's gone. If he's not

0:10:48.000 --> 0:10:51.199
<v Speaker 1>there at number five, what would you do? Yeah, I mean,

0:10:51.200 --> 0:10:53.520
<v Speaker 1>still go wide receiver, you know, and this is a

0:10:53.600 --> 0:10:57.360
<v Speaker 1>very interesting debate that myself and our two other draft guys,

0:10:57.400 --> 0:10:59.760
<v Speaker 1>Austin gil and Mike Grinner, I've had with them countless

0:10:59.760 --> 0:11:02.800
<v Speaker 1>time that they're big jail and Waddle over DeVonta Smith

0:11:02.880 --> 0:11:05.800
<v Speaker 1>guys barely. But I think I would prefer Davonta Smith

0:11:05.800 --> 0:11:07.520
<v Speaker 1>over jail and Waddle. And I think we're kind of

0:11:07.559 --> 0:11:09.880
<v Speaker 1>splitting hairs when comparing me too. It just kind of

0:11:09.880 --> 0:11:11.760
<v Speaker 1>picked your poison which kind of guy you want there?

0:11:12.320 --> 0:11:14.400
<v Speaker 1>You know, with DeVonta Smith, you know I would still

0:11:14.400 --> 0:11:17.600
<v Speaker 1>take him over Pini. Sooled the only concern is his size.

0:11:18.000 --> 0:11:19.719
<v Speaker 1>His speed I think is going to be fine, and

0:11:19.800 --> 0:11:21.760
<v Speaker 1>I think some people are a little bit too concerned

0:11:21.800 --> 0:11:24.760
<v Speaker 1>about it. But you know, when looking at his comparisons

0:11:24.760 --> 0:11:28.240
<v Speaker 1>from an athleticism standpoint, in a frame standpoint, we've never

0:11:28.240 --> 0:11:31.320
<v Speaker 1>really seen a player like DeVonta Smith, you know, translates

0:11:31.320 --> 0:11:33.640
<v Speaker 1>to the NFL and have you know, great success. So

0:11:33.679 --> 0:11:36.200
<v Speaker 1>I think that's kind of the pushback on him. But

0:11:36.440 --> 0:11:37.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, you look on him out in the field

0:11:37.880 --> 0:11:39.040
<v Speaker 1>and you look at the tape. I mean, he does

0:11:39.120 --> 0:11:41.800
<v Speaker 1>everything in the position at an extremely high level, from

0:11:41.800 --> 0:11:45.880
<v Speaker 1>his route running, his release packages, ball skills especially. You know,

0:11:45.920 --> 0:11:48.079
<v Speaker 1>he is going to be, in my opinion, a very

0:11:48.080 --> 0:11:50.520
<v Speaker 1>good wide receiver at the NFL. And with Jaalen Waddle too.

0:11:50.600 --> 0:11:52.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the guy has deep speed for days, and

0:11:52.840 --> 0:11:55.400
<v Speaker 1>he's going to immediately be a premier deep threat and

0:11:55.440 --> 0:11:57.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, Joe Brow could certainly use that. I mean

0:11:57.360 --> 0:12:00.320
<v Speaker 1>this past year, the deep ball was not good at all.

0:12:00.440 --> 0:12:02.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean it was one of the worst in the NFL.

0:12:02.200 --> 0:12:04.040
<v Speaker 1>But at the same time, you didn't really have a

0:12:04.040 --> 0:12:05.640
<v Speaker 1>lot of time to throw that off as a line

0:12:05.640 --> 0:12:07.520
<v Speaker 1>didn't help him. I think, you know, didn't really have

0:12:07.559 --> 0:12:10.000
<v Speaker 1>a lot of separators downfield. I think bringing in a guy,

0:12:10.320 --> 0:12:12.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, whether that's Jail and Wilds, Mon Smith, Jamar Chase,

0:12:12.960 --> 0:12:14.760
<v Speaker 1>I think any of those three could really help him

0:12:14.960 --> 0:12:17.400
<v Speaker 1>take that next step forward and really kind of put

0:12:17.440 --> 0:12:20.960
<v Speaker 1>him into that top ten, you know, type of quarterback

0:12:21.000 --> 0:12:23.880
<v Speaker 1>that he looks like he's going to become. If they

0:12:23.880 --> 0:12:28.120
<v Speaker 1>are unable to sign Taylor Molten or Daryl Williams, the

0:12:28.160 --> 0:12:32.040
<v Speaker 1>top two tackles you have listed at that point, would

0:12:32.040 --> 0:12:35.120
<v Speaker 1>you take pinnay Sewel. Don't not take a pin Suel

0:12:35.200 --> 0:12:38.000
<v Speaker 1>just because I mean, yeah, this is a I mean

0:12:38.000 --> 0:12:40.520
<v Speaker 1>the Bengals are in a really good position. You know,

0:12:40.760 --> 0:12:44.120
<v Speaker 1>the fact that this tackle class is so loaded is

0:12:44.120 --> 0:12:46.080
<v Speaker 1>a big reason for that. I mean, I would have

0:12:46.120 --> 0:12:48.400
<v Speaker 1>to say, I mean this draft is kind of interesting

0:12:48.440 --> 0:12:50.840
<v Speaker 1>just because I think quarterbacks are very stack position. Wide

0:12:50.840 --> 0:12:53.439
<v Speaker 1>receivers a stack position, and so is tackle. But then

0:12:53.440 --> 0:12:55.760
<v Speaker 1>once out you look at any other position, it gets

0:12:55.880 --> 0:12:58.199
<v Speaker 1>very very bad. But you know, these are the positions

0:12:58.200 --> 0:12:59.880
<v Speaker 1>they kind of need to address, and you know, where

0:13:00.120 --> 0:13:02.280
<v Speaker 1>or picking in round two, there's going to be quality

0:13:02.320 --> 0:13:04.800
<v Speaker 1>tackles there available to them. You know, whether it's you know,

0:13:04.920 --> 0:13:08.520
<v Speaker 1>Leam Eichenberg of Notre Dame, Alex Leatherwood, He's he's going

0:13:08.600 --> 0:13:11.200
<v Speaker 1>to be slipping down there. Sam Cosmi of Texas is available.

0:13:11.360 --> 0:13:13.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean, all of these guys are great options to have,

0:13:13.440 --> 0:13:15.440
<v Speaker 1>and I think they can address that in round two.

0:13:15.480 --> 0:13:18.200
<v Speaker 1>But the ideal scenario is, you know, kind of landing

0:13:18.240 --> 0:13:20.360
<v Speaker 1>an established one in free agency that can come in

0:13:20.440 --> 0:13:23.640
<v Speaker 1>right away. But even then, if they do land a

0:13:23.720 --> 0:13:27.160
<v Speaker 1>guy like Moton, take Jamarche safe. Fifth. Overall, I still

0:13:27.160 --> 0:13:29.640
<v Speaker 1>think taking a tackle in the second round is something

0:13:29.679 --> 0:13:32.200
<v Speaker 1>they should do, just because you know, the offensive line

0:13:32.360 --> 0:13:34.000
<v Speaker 1>was extremely bad. I think you just kind of keep

0:13:34.040 --> 0:13:35.760
<v Speaker 1>swinging there and I think you can find pretty good

0:13:35.800 --> 0:13:38.199
<v Speaker 1>value there. But in round one, I still think you

0:13:38.200 --> 0:13:41.240
<v Speaker 1>should take, you know, these elite level wide receiver prospects

0:13:41.280 --> 0:13:43.559
<v Speaker 1>as a chance to really, you know, be a true

0:13:43.679 --> 0:13:45.679
<v Speaker 1>elite wide receiver number one at the next level. Over

0:13:45.720 --> 0:13:49.280
<v Speaker 1>Penny School. We're talking to Anthony Trash from Pro Football Focus.

0:13:49.320 --> 0:13:51.760
<v Speaker 1>I highly recommend his guide to free agency that he

0:13:51.840 --> 0:13:55.280
<v Speaker 1>published on Monday on the website. Another part of your

0:13:55.320 --> 0:13:59.720
<v Speaker 1>team by team analysis is potential cuts and for the

0:13:59.720 --> 0:14:02.000
<v Speaker 1>bank goals. The first two guys you have listed are

0:14:02.040 --> 0:14:05.880
<v Speaker 1>Geno Atkins and Bobby Hart. Are they no brainers in

0:14:05.920 --> 0:14:08.959
<v Speaker 1>your opinion? For guys to cut to create space? This

0:14:09.040 --> 0:14:11.440
<v Speaker 1>is always a tough one to gauge. I think Bobby

0:14:11.520 --> 0:14:14.280
<v Speaker 1>Hart certainly is. I mean, he has not been the

0:14:14.400 --> 0:14:17.320
<v Speaker 1>performer that you know many have been hoping for. UM.

0:14:17.520 --> 0:14:19.800
<v Speaker 1>I would say he's probably the shirt shirts fire one.

0:14:20.040 --> 0:14:22.120
<v Speaker 1>Do you know Atkins? You know, I think you know,

0:14:22.120 --> 0:14:23.720
<v Speaker 1>he could still contribute at a high level, but he

0:14:23.720 --> 0:14:26.080
<v Speaker 1>does have a pretty fast salary UM, So you know,

0:14:26.200 --> 0:14:27.840
<v Speaker 1>never say never with some of these guys on what

0:14:27.920 --> 0:14:30.400
<v Speaker 1>they could do. I think Giovanni Bernard and CJ who's

0:14:30.440 --> 0:14:32.440
<v Speaker 1>on I listed in there as well. Could be ones

0:14:32.480 --> 0:14:34.880
<v Speaker 1>that could get looked at. Um. But you know, the

0:14:34.920 --> 0:14:37.120
<v Speaker 1>Cincinnati Bengals are sent pretty well in cap space with

0:14:37.240 --> 0:14:41.040
<v Speaker 1>around you know, thirty seven projected. He's thirty seven million projected,

0:14:41.040 --> 0:14:43.480
<v Speaker 1>if that salary cap is around one hundred and eighty

0:14:43.480 --> 0:14:45.760
<v Speaker 1>million has reported. Um. You know, in the promost teams,

0:14:45.800 --> 0:14:47.560
<v Speaker 1>they would they have killed of being a position with that.

0:14:47.840 --> 0:14:50.000
<v Speaker 1>So you know that they could be you know, willing

0:14:50.040 --> 0:14:51.720
<v Speaker 1>to bring some of these guys back and don't feel

0:14:51.720 --> 0:14:53.120
<v Speaker 1>like they have to cut him. But you know, those

0:14:53.160 --> 0:14:55.960
<v Speaker 1>four names are the ones that come to mind, Anthony.

0:14:55.960 --> 0:14:58.440
<v Speaker 1>In addition to the Free agency Guide, you also recently

0:14:58.520 --> 0:15:01.920
<v Speaker 1>ranked all thirty two draft classes from last year and

0:15:02.000 --> 0:15:06.200
<v Speaker 1>ranked the Bengals twenty twenty class number one. What stood

0:15:06.200 --> 0:15:09.000
<v Speaker 1>out about last year's rookie class for the Bengals, Yeah,

0:15:09.040 --> 0:15:11.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean it's all about Joe Burrow and See Higgins.

0:15:11.040 --> 0:15:12.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean that those are those two are the sole

0:15:12.520 --> 0:15:15.240
<v Speaker 1>reasons why they came in with that top sply I

0:15:15.320 --> 0:15:17.960
<v Speaker 1>had really had no one, nothing to do with any

0:15:18.000 --> 0:15:20.640
<v Speaker 1>any of the other guys they drafted after that, just

0:15:20.680 --> 0:15:23.040
<v Speaker 1>because Joe Burrow before he got hurt, I mean, he

0:15:23.080 --> 0:15:24.840
<v Speaker 1>was looking like he would have been our Rookie of

0:15:24.880 --> 0:15:26.680
<v Speaker 1>the Year. He was already one of the more valuable

0:15:26.720 --> 0:15:28.960
<v Speaker 1>quarterbacks in the NFL. And like I said, he didn't

0:15:28.960 --> 0:15:30.800
<v Speaker 1>really have the deep all there, but you look at

0:15:30.800 --> 0:15:33.160
<v Speaker 1>the stable factors, you know, from the clean pocket, what

0:15:33.240 --> 0:15:35.520
<v Speaker 1>was his you know, the negatively great throw rate on

0:15:35.560 --> 0:15:37.520
<v Speaker 1>those non deep passes, and he was up there was

0:15:37.560 --> 0:15:40.040
<v Speaker 1>some of the best in the NFL, you know, number

0:15:40.280 --> 0:15:42.520
<v Speaker 1>number one, number two, number three, and some of those categories,

0:15:42.560 --> 0:15:45.640
<v Speaker 1>the most important categories at the quarterback position, so you know,

0:15:45.680 --> 0:15:47.920
<v Speaker 1>you really don't typically see that from a rookie, and

0:15:47.960 --> 0:15:50.880
<v Speaker 1>that really generated his value. In two, I mean you

0:15:51.400 --> 0:15:53.080
<v Speaker 1>kind of you kind of got a free pass with

0:15:53.160 --> 0:15:55.520
<v Speaker 1>Joe Burrow there at number one, just because he's as

0:15:55.560 --> 0:15:57.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, as you never have a slam dunk with

0:15:57.960 --> 0:16:00.800
<v Speaker 1>the first overall pick, especially at quarterback. Joe Burrow was

0:16:00.840 --> 0:16:03.240
<v Speaker 1>looking like, you know, one of the surest picks at

0:16:03.400 --> 0:16:06.040
<v Speaker 1>the first overall that we've ever really seen. So we

0:16:06.160 --> 0:16:07.480
<v Speaker 1>knew that he was going to you know, kind of

0:16:07.520 --> 0:16:11.160
<v Speaker 1>conte contribute and produce his value above expectation like he did.

0:16:11.480 --> 0:16:13.000
<v Speaker 1>And in two with te Higgins, I mean, this was

0:16:13.040 --> 0:16:15.560
<v Speaker 1>a home run pick for them. I personally was not

0:16:15.640 --> 0:16:18.280
<v Speaker 1>expecting him to pick te Higgins thirty third overall. You know,

0:16:18.360 --> 0:16:20.000
<v Speaker 1>I expect him to go down some other avenues, but

0:16:20.000 --> 0:16:21.880
<v Speaker 1>I absolutely love the pick. It was probably, you know,

0:16:21.920 --> 0:16:23.560
<v Speaker 1>one of my five favorite picks of the draft at

0:16:23.600 --> 0:16:25.440
<v Speaker 1>the time, just because you know, of the me that

0:16:25.480 --> 0:16:27.640
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver, and you know, I think he is going to,

0:16:27.720 --> 0:16:30.480
<v Speaker 1>like I said, developed into a quality, complimentary piece. I mean,

0:16:30.720 --> 0:16:32.600
<v Speaker 1>I really do like his ball skills. I thought he

0:16:32.640 --> 0:16:35.120
<v Speaker 1>improved too. You know, he was great at the catchpoint

0:16:35.120 --> 0:16:37.280
<v Speaker 1>at Clemson. He got better as the year progress and

0:16:37.320 --> 0:16:38.640
<v Speaker 1>ended up one of you know, one of the higher

0:16:38.680 --> 0:16:41.560
<v Speaker 1>graded rookie receivers in the NFL. Was actually the second

0:16:41.560 --> 0:16:44.280
<v Speaker 1>most valuable you know, second round pick of the twenty

0:16:44.360 --> 0:16:47.840
<v Speaker 1>twenty NFL Draft. So those two picks combined really produced

0:16:47.880 --> 0:16:51.080
<v Speaker 1>above expectation and really really put themselves into that number

0:16:51.080 --> 0:16:53.560
<v Speaker 1>one overall spot. And you know, kind of looking at that,

0:16:53.640 --> 0:16:55.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's kind of hard to wrape your head

0:16:55.480 --> 0:16:57.600
<v Speaker 1>around just because they hit these two picks. But you know,

0:16:57.640 --> 0:17:00.960
<v Speaker 1>this past year, we really didn't see too many rookie

0:17:01.000 --> 0:17:04.040
<v Speaker 1>performers had great seasons. I mean, you know, Justin Herbert

0:17:04.080 --> 0:17:06.719
<v Speaker 1>and you know, Justin Jefferson, Chase Young. They all had

0:17:06.720 --> 0:17:09.200
<v Speaker 1>great years, but when you're looking at the entire draft

0:17:09.200 --> 0:17:11.680
<v Speaker 1>class compared to other years, we didn't really see a

0:17:11.800 --> 0:17:13.920
<v Speaker 1>high rate of rookies kind of have success in your one,

0:17:13.960 --> 0:17:16.239
<v Speaker 1>and you know COVID obviously I had an impact with that.

0:17:16.280 --> 0:17:18.800
<v Speaker 1>So you know, having those two guys for Cincinnati, the

0:17:18.880 --> 0:17:22.120
<v Speaker 1>Higgins and Joe Burrow, really exceed expectations right away, even

0:17:22.160 --> 0:17:24.520
<v Speaker 1>though they did have locky expectations to start with, really

0:17:24.520 --> 0:17:26.760
<v Speaker 1>put them in that top spot. Who is the second

0:17:26.840 --> 0:17:29.600
<v Speaker 1>round pick that you had ranked higher than Tea Oh,

0:17:30.160 --> 0:17:32.920
<v Speaker 1>I think it might have been Antoine Winfield. I think

0:17:32.920 --> 0:17:35.159
<v Speaker 1>it was him, if I recall correctly. I mean he

0:17:35.440 --> 0:17:37.879
<v Speaker 1>was another one that we thought, you know, I mentioned

0:17:37.880 --> 0:17:40.119
<v Speaker 1>earlier my five favorite picks in the NFL Draft. I

0:17:40.119 --> 0:17:42.600
<v Speaker 1>think he was probably up there too. I remember writing

0:17:42.600 --> 0:17:45.080
<v Speaker 1>an article about that, just because you know, we fought

0:17:45.119 --> 0:17:47.399
<v Speaker 1>him as a first round pick and he slipped to

0:17:47.480 --> 0:17:50.040
<v Speaker 1>the Tampa Bay Buccaneers. They're up being a valuable piece

0:17:50.080 --> 0:17:53.000
<v Speaker 1>to him. So I'm pretty sure on the data in

0:17:53.080 --> 0:17:54.720
<v Speaker 1>front of me, but I'm pretty sure it was the

0:17:54.720 --> 0:17:58.320
<v Speaker 1>Antoine Winfield. If Burrow and Higgins were the biggest reasons

0:17:58.320 --> 0:18:00.520
<v Speaker 1>why the beggar Bengals had the number one half class

0:18:00.560 --> 0:18:04.560
<v Speaker 1>in your opinion, Did any of the other guys stand out? No,

0:18:04.640 --> 0:18:07.520
<v Speaker 1>not really unfortunately, But I mean there's still time just

0:18:07.600 --> 0:18:11.520
<v Speaker 1>because you look at the rookie year and it's very

0:18:11.560 --> 0:18:13.919
<v Speaker 1>it's not very predictive of future success. I mean we

0:18:14.040 --> 0:18:17.840
<v Speaker 1>typically see for most positions, the second year kind of

0:18:17.880 --> 0:18:20.600
<v Speaker 1>you get a better understanding of what kind of career

0:18:20.640 --> 0:18:23.159
<v Speaker 1>of a young player is going to have in the

0:18:23.240 --> 0:18:26.120
<v Speaker 1>long run. So it's way too early actually to call

0:18:26.200 --> 0:18:27.920
<v Speaker 1>these guys. Any of these guys, you know, a bus

0:18:27.920 --> 0:18:30.600
<v Speaker 1>are not a good pick just because it's that pivotal

0:18:30.720 --> 0:18:32.280
<v Speaker 1>year two, and you know, I think after a year

0:18:32.320 --> 0:18:34.560
<v Speaker 1>two is a good time to come back and reflect,

0:18:34.840 --> 0:18:36.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, on them. I want to get back to

0:18:37.040 --> 0:18:39.960
<v Speaker 1>Burrow for a second, because by the traditional stats that

0:18:40.000 --> 0:18:42.760
<v Speaker 1>we've looked at for years and years and years, passer rating,

0:18:44.040 --> 0:18:46.800
<v Speaker 1>yards per attempt, things like that, Joe came in twenty

0:18:46.800 --> 0:18:49.360
<v Speaker 1>fourth and passer rating twenty fifth and yards per attempt.

0:18:49.640 --> 0:18:52.400
<v Speaker 1>Pro Football Focus had him graded much higher than that.

0:18:52.520 --> 0:18:56.560
<v Speaker 1>And you referred to some of the stable metrics, some

0:18:56.640 --> 0:18:59.880
<v Speaker 1>of the things that really project year to year to year.

0:19:00.119 --> 0:19:02.920
<v Speaker 1>Can you explain that a little bit better. When looking

0:19:02.920 --> 0:19:05.520
<v Speaker 1>at those stable factors, you really want to isolate quarterback

0:19:05.560 --> 0:19:08.760
<v Speaker 1>performance to clean pocket play, just because when you look

0:19:08.800 --> 0:19:11.359
<v Speaker 1>at you know, performance from a clean pocket versus in

0:19:11.400 --> 0:19:14.679
<v Speaker 1>a pressure pocket, you know, clean performance is way more

0:19:14.720 --> 0:19:17.800
<v Speaker 1>stable your year. In pressure performance that's way more volatible.

0:19:17.800 --> 0:19:20.919
<v Speaker 1>And that's an interesting thing with Justin Herbert, you know,

0:19:20.960 --> 0:19:23.480
<v Speaker 1>the other quarterback that had great success, the offensive rookie

0:19:23.520 --> 0:19:25.440
<v Speaker 1>of the year, just because he had a lot of

0:19:25.480 --> 0:19:28.639
<v Speaker 1>success when pressure that's not sustainable year to year. He

0:19:28.720 --> 0:19:30.480
<v Speaker 1>really was not that good from a clean pocket. So

0:19:30.480 --> 0:19:32.600
<v Speaker 1>I think we're going to see regressing from him. But

0:19:32.640 --> 0:19:35.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm guy going off into changent there. But with Joe Burrow,

0:19:35.800 --> 0:19:38.600
<v Speaker 1>he had the one of the lowest rates of quarterback

0:19:38.680 --> 0:19:40.840
<v Speaker 1>fault in completions from a clean pocket. I mean the

0:19:41.200 --> 0:19:43.760
<v Speaker 1>pinpoint accuracy that we saw at else Hu, we saw

0:19:43.880 --> 0:19:46.480
<v Speaker 1>routine lye with the Banls in his first ten games,

0:19:46.480 --> 0:19:49.320
<v Speaker 1>and I mean the fact that he still finished sixteenth

0:19:49.440 --> 0:19:52.800
<v Speaker 1>in war among quarterbacks despite missing you know, the second

0:19:52.800 --> 0:19:55.920
<v Speaker 1>half of the season is quite remarkable. So I mean,

0:19:55.960 --> 0:19:58.639
<v Speaker 1>I think Joe Burrow is you know, as good as

0:19:58.640 --> 0:20:02.160
<v Speaker 1>a rookie campaign that Justin Herbert and Justin Jefferson had

0:20:02.359 --> 0:20:04.239
<v Speaker 1>I still think Joe Burrow is going to be the

0:20:04.280 --> 0:20:06.440
<v Speaker 1>best rookie or the best player from the twenty twenty

0:20:06.480 --> 0:20:09.480
<v Speaker 1>one or twenty twenty NFL draft class. You'll by far.

0:20:09.560 --> 0:20:12.159
<v Speaker 1>I think he's going to be a star quarterback in

0:20:12.200 --> 0:20:15.680
<v Speaker 1>the NFL that is possibly gonna hopefully lead Cincinnati to

0:20:15.720 --> 0:20:18.119
<v Speaker 1>the super Bowl. We'll see someday in the years to combat.

0:20:18.200 --> 0:20:19.720
<v Speaker 1>I think he's the real deal and he's going to

0:20:19.800 --> 0:20:22.639
<v Speaker 1>be a very special guy here for Cincinnati. I like

0:20:22.720 --> 0:20:25.280
<v Speaker 1>the way you think. We're talking to Anthony Trash from

0:20:25.280 --> 0:20:29.400
<v Speaker 1>Pro Football Focus. You also do a lot of college analysis.

0:20:29.440 --> 0:20:34.640
<v Speaker 1>You recently published your top ten returning quarterbacks in college football.

0:20:34.960 --> 0:20:37.919
<v Speaker 1>In addition, dude doing Bengals games, I broadcast University of

0:20:37.960 --> 0:20:41.400
<v Speaker 1>Cincinnati games. You did not have my guy, Desmond Ritter

0:20:41.520 --> 0:20:45.439
<v Speaker 1>in your top ten. Explain why? Yeah, I mean this

0:20:45.520 --> 0:20:47.840
<v Speaker 1>was the tough list to make up. You know, with

0:20:48.000 --> 0:20:51.280
<v Speaker 1>Desmond Ritter, he obviously adds value with this mobility. The

0:20:51.320 --> 0:20:53.159
<v Speaker 1>tools are off the charts, and that's what kind of

0:20:53.200 --> 0:20:55.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, we were looking at the twenty twenty one

0:20:55.160 --> 0:20:57.520
<v Speaker 1>NFL draft before he decided to come back. You know,

0:20:57.600 --> 0:21:00.320
<v Speaker 1>he was kind of getting that mid round considerate just

0:21:00.359 --> 0:21:03.520
<v Speaker 1>because he's a very potential base guy. Either the tools

0:21:03.520 --> 0:21:05.960
<v Speaker 1>are there, it becomes about something special. But we just

0:21:06.000 --> 0:21:08.040
<v Speaker 1>have not seen that from Desmond Ritter. I mean this

0:21:08.080 --> 0:21:10.400
<v Speaker 1>past year he had a sub seventy passing grade, which

0:21:10.400 --> 0:21:13.320
<v Speaker 1>was he did that too back in twenty nineteen, and

0:21:13.440 --> 0:21:15.639
<v Speaker 1>we were looking at those, like I mentioned earlier, the

0:21:15.680 --> 0:21:18.080
<v Speaker 1>stable factors, the clean pocket passing grade, and he was

0:21:18.080 --> 0:21:20.879
<v Speaker 1>just at the twenty fourth percentile in college football this

0:21:20.920 --> 0:21:24.240
<v Speaker 1>past season. The downfield, you know, accuracy was very shoddy.

0:21:24.320 --> 0:21:26.560
<v Speaker 1>He had a high rate of uncatchable throws. Great, he

0:21:26.560 --> 0:21:28.280
<v Speaker 1>really didn't put the ball on harm's way with his

0:21:28.359 --> 0:21:30.680
<v Speaker 1>downfield passing when he did pull the trigger down there.

0:21:31.320 --> 0:21:33.639
<v Speaker 1>But we just really didn't see him hit those throws

0:21:33.640 --> 0:21:36.439
<v Speaker 1>at an extremely high rate like we wanted to from

0:21:36.480 --> 0:21:39.240
<v Speaker 1>an accuracy standpoint, we didn't. And the negatively grade the

0:21:39.240 --> 0:21:42.200
<v Speaker 1>throw rate was another concern, not isolating those those true

0:21:42.280 --> 0:21:47.240
<v Speaker 1>dropback scenarios, taking away play actions, RPO screens, quick throws,

0:21:47.560 --> 0:21:50.800
<v Speaker 1>looking at throws from inside the pocket. The numbers just

0:21:50.840 --> 0:21:52.879
<v Speaker 1>weren't that great. Four Desmond Ritter. So you know, I

0:21:53.040 --> 0:21:55.119
<v Speaker 1>think Cincinnati's gonna have a great team next year. I

0:21:55.119 --> 0:21:56.680
<v Speaker 1>think they're going to be be one of the better

0:21:56.720 --> 0:21:59.240
<v Speaker 1>group of five teams again. You know, I love of

0:21:59.359 --> 0:22:01.240
<v Speaker 1>my Gardener, the cornerback. I think he's going to be

0:22:01.359 --> 0:22:04.359
<v Speaker 1>started at the NFL level eventually one day. But with

0:22:04.400 --> 0:22:06.639
<v Speaker 1>Desmond Ritter, he did not crack the top ten, but

0:22:06.720 --> 0:22:09.040
<v Speaker 1>he is. He was in a conversation with some of

0:22:09.080 --> 0:22:11.840
<v Speaker 1>the guys here I will say about so you and

0:22:11.920 --> 0:22:14.680
<v Speaker 1>your colleagues at Pro Football Focus have been cranking out

0:22:14.800 --> 0:22:18.960
<v Speaker 1>mock drafts about one a week. Most recently, Mike Renner

0:22:19.160 --> 0:22:22.040
<v Speaker 1>has Jamar Chase going to the Bengals at number five.

0:22:22.480 --> 0:22:25.919
<v Speaker 1>The week before that, Ben Lindsley Jamar Chase going to

0:22:25.960 --> 0:22:29.040
<v Speaker 1>the Bengals at number five, the week before that, Steve

0:22:29.119 --> 0:22:32.400
<v Speaker 1>Palazzolo Jamar Chase going to the Bengals at number five.

0:22:32.920 --> 0:22:36.520
<v Speaker 1>It seems like the gurus that you work with are

0:22:36.560 --> 0:22:40.119
<v Speaker 1>in lockstep that if he's there, that's the guy to

0:22:40.160 --> 0:22:43.240
<v Speaker 1>take to reunite with Joe Burrow. We're all in agreement

0:22:43.280 --> 0:22:46.920
<v Speaker 1>here and that that doesn't happen often the PFF headquarters here,

0:22:47.000 --> 0:22:49.399
<v Speaker 1>but uh, you know, we really do think that's the

0:22:49.480 --> 0:22:52.200
<v Speaker 1>best fit for them. You know, with some of the

0:22:52.240 --> 0:22:55.440
<v Speaker 1>guys you mentioned, there, all of them, besides Mike. Grinner's

0:22:55.520 --> 0:22:57.159
<v Speaker 1>kind of you know what we would do if we

0:22:57.200 --> 0:22:58.479
<v Speaker 1>were in the shoes of the gym. But with Mike,

0:22:58.560 --> 0:23:00.640
<v Speaker 1>he's kind of trying to predict and really does think

0:23:00.680 --> 0:23:02.920
<v Speaker 1>that there's a good chance that they do reunite Joe

0:23:02.920 --> 0:23:05.280
<v Speaker 1>Burrow with Jamar Chase, just because looking back at that

0:23:05.280 --> 0:23:08.120
<v Speaker 1>twenty nineteen season, I mean, that was a special, very

0:23:08.119 --> 0:23:10.840
<v Speaker 1>special duo. You know, it's up there with one of

0:23:10.880 --> 0:23:12.920
<v Speaker 1>the best quarterback wide receiver duos we have ever seen

0:23:12.920 --> 0:23:15.600
<v Speaker 1>it in the history of college football. I mean, they

0:23:15.640 --> 0:23:18.800
<v Speaker 1>still hold the PFF college record for this is going

0:23:18.840 --> 0:23:23.200
<v Speaker 1>back seven seasons for the most deep passing touchdowns and

0:23:23.359 --> 0:23:25.960
<v Speaker 1>completions in a single year. I mean, it was just

0:23:26.080 --> 0:23:29.480
<v Speaker 1>kind of record sat our record chattering across the board

0:23:29.480 --> 0:23:31.440
<v Speaker 1>from both of them. I mean, it was a very

0:23:31.480 --> 0:23:34.760
<v Speaker 1>elite connection in tandem, and in replicating that in Cincinnati,

0:23:34.800 --> 0:23:36.399
<v Speaker 1>I think they have a really good chance to do so.

0:23:36.560 --> 0:23:39.200
<v Speaker 1>Just you know, given the projections that we have on

0:23:39.240 --> 0:23:44.840
<v Speaker 1>both guys, your projections for Piney Sewell are equally high. Really,

0:23:44.960 --> 0:23:46.639
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the last time he played a couple of

0:23:46.720 --> 0:23:48.480
<v Speaker 1>years ago, at the age of nineteen, I think he

0:23:48.520 --> 0:23:52.720
<v Speaker 1>had the highest PFF grade for an offensive tackle. This

0:23:52.840 --> 0:23:58.200
<v Speaker 1>is strictly a matter of position, importance and value. Basically,

0:23:58.200 --> 0:24:03.560
<v Speaker 1>when you are projecting Chase over Paul right, yeah, I

0:24:03.600 --> 0:24:07.399
<v Speaker 1>mean the Pinnasools player comparisons at the next level favorite

0:24:07.440 --> 0:24:10.400
<v Speaker 1>pretty well. Um if I recall correctly, his past protection

0:24:10.480 --> 0:24:12.920
<v Speaker 1>numbers are kind of project him on the path of

0:24:13.040 --> 0:24:16.680
<v Speaker 1>guys like David Pactiari intrumentally. I mean, it's going he's

0:24:16.720 --> 0:24:19.600
<v Speaker 1>going to be a very good offensive tackle, but it's

0:24:19.600 --> 0:24:22.200
<v Speaker 1>just all about you know, his maximum sealing him the

0:24:22.280 --> 0:24:24.840
<v Speaker 1>value he can generate is a little bit different than

0:24:24.880 --> 0:24:27.080
<v Speaker 1>what a guy like Jamar Chase can do for an offense.

0:24:27.359 --> 0:24:29.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we do think Jamar Chase is a guy

0:24:29.480 --> 0:24:31.960
<v Speaker 1>that can put you know, the Bengals over a hump

0:24:32.000 --> 0:24:34.199
<v Speaker 1>from a versus Pennai suol Is. You know, he's not

0:24:34.240 --> 0:24:36.119
<v Speaker 1>going to be the guy that's going to add multiple

0:24:36.119 --> 0:24:38.440
<v Speaker 1>wins to a team just him alone. Jamar Chase has

0:24:38.480 --> 0:24:41.359
<v Speaker 1>the capability of doing that. Um. So it's just a

0:24:41.400 --> 0:24:44.200
<v Speaker 1>strict matter of you know, positional value. Pinna Soool is

0:24:44.240 --> 0:24:46.040
<v Speaker 1>a great, great player. He's going to be a great

0:24:46.080 --> 0:24:48.320
<v Speaker 1>NFL player if the Bengals do end up you know,

0:24:48.440 --> 0:24:50.920
<v Speaker 1>landing him. I wouldn't be you know, two matt or

0:24:51.040 --> 0:24:53.280
<v Speaker 1>upset if I were, you know, a Bengals fan that's

0:24:53.320 --> 0:24:55.520
<v Speaker 1>kind of listening to PFF and listening to what they

0:24:55.560 --> 0:24:58.320
<v Speaker 1>have to say. Um. But I do think the right

0:24:58.359 --> 0:24:59.880
<v Speaker 1>decision at the end of the day is to take

0:25:00.000 --> 0:25:02.280
<v Speaker 1>one of those three wide receiver prospects, just because I mean,

0:25:02.320 --> 0:25:05.440
<v Speaker 1>they are three very good wide receiver prospects and any

0:25:05.480 --> 0:25:08.280
<v Speaker 1>other year they'd be in the conversation for wide receiver one.

0:25:08.359 --> 0:25:10.199
<v Speaker 1>So I mean, I think these guys are kind of

0:25:10.200 --> 0:25:13.040
<v Speaker 1>can't miss too. So I do think because of the

0:25:13.040 --> 0:25:16.080
<v Speaker 1>positional value, that's the way you should leave. So I

0:25:16.080 --> 0:25:18.280
<v Speaker 1>am going to allow you to spend the Bengals money.

0:25:18.720 --> 0:25:21.879
<v Speaker 1>You have signed Taylor Moton and Joe Tuney as free agents.

0:25:21.920 --> 0:25:25.840
<v Speaker 1>You have resigned Will Jackson. You have drafted Jamar Chase

0:25:25.920 --> 0:25:28.719
<v Speaker 1>in the first round. So basically they followed your what

0:25:28.880 --> 0:25:32.240
<v Speaker 1>to do blueprint for this offseason. How good can the

0:25:32.280 --> 0:25:35.960
<v Speaker 1>Bengals be if they execute those moves? Are most of

0:25:35.960 --> 0:25:39.800
<v Speaker 1>those moves, I think they can be a playoff team.

0:25:39.800 --> 0:25:41.920
<v Speaker 1>Maybe it's going to be tough, maybe next year and

0:25:42.000 --> 0:25:43.439
<v Speaker 1>year one, but I do think the year after that

0:25:43.480 --> 0:25:45.119
<v Speaker 1>I think that would put them in that, you know,

0:25:45.160 --> 0:25:48.240
<v Speaker 1>the very competitive team status. You know, their division is

0:25:48.280 --> 0:25:50.879
<v Speaker 1>a very interesting one, just because the Pittsburgh Steelers, I

0:25:50.880 --> 0:25:52.680
<v Speaker 1>don't think they're going to be very good next year.

0:25:53.160 --> 0:25:56.119
<v Speaker 1>Ben Roethlisberger is clearly declining in their their cap situations

0:25:56.160 --> 0:25:59.119
<v Speaker 1>pretty bad as it is right now. But looking at

0:25:59.160 --> 0:26:02.000
<v Speaker 1>the Cleveland Browns and Baltimore Ravens, I mean these two teams,

0:26:02.000 --> 0:26:04.119
<v Speaker 1>I mean, Cleveland Browns are an offensive juggernaut in the

0:26:04.160 --> 0:26:07.080
<v Speaker 1>making of Baltimore Ravens are still there. So there, it's

0:26:07.119 --> 0:26:10.200
<v Speaker 1>going to be a very competitive division. And for that reason,

0:26:10.240 --> 0:26:12.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm not so sure they would put themselves into put

0:26:12.480 --> 0:26:15.600
<v Speaker 1>out contention, you know, right away in your one, but

0:26:15.640 --> 0:26:18.120
<v Speaker 1>I do think, you know, the year after, they would

0:26:18.119 --> 0:26:19.879
<v Speaker 1>definitely be up there with all this talent they have.

0:26:20.520 --> 0:26:22.520
<v Speaker 1>As I mentioned at the top, you've been putting out

0:26:22.520 --> 0:26:25.440
<v Speaker 1>some very interesting material about the Bengals in the entire

0:26:25.640 --> 0:26:28.719
<v Speaker 1>NFL of late. I've enjoyed reading it and looking at it.

0:26:29.280 --> 0:26:31.680
<v Speaker 1>Anything coming up in the near future that you're working

0:26:31.680 --> 0:26:33.600
<v Speaker 1>on that we can look forward to. We've got all

0:26:33.680 --> 0:26:36.600
<v Speaker 1>kinds of free agency stuff coming out in the coming days.

0:26:36.640 --> 0:26:39.679
<v Speaker 1>Have our most overrated underrated free agents. Be sure to

0:26:39.760 --> 0:26:41.600
<v Speaker 1>check that out over at PFF dot com. But the

0:26:41.640 --> 0:26:43.959
<v Speaker 1>biggest thing we have is our NFL Draft Guide. Our guy,

0:26:44.040 --> 0:26:46.399
<v Speaker 1>my Printer, who we've mentioned a few different times. I mean,

0:26:46.440 --> 0:26:48.200
<v Speaker 1>he was just absolutely grinding this thing out for the

0:26:48.240 --> 0:26:49.960
<v Speaker 1>last couple of months. I think we're at two hundred

0:26:49.960 --> 0:26:52.959
<v Speaker 1>and fifty player profiles with like three or four pages

0:26:52.960 --> 0:26:56.399
<v Speaker 1>of data and analysis, you know, advanced scouting reports in

0:26:56.440 --> 0:26:58.200
<v Speaker 1>there too, So it's only going to grow. I think

0:26:58.200 --> 0:27:00.520
<v Speaker 1>he might actually hitting three hundred sure if he's going

0:27:00.520 --> 0:27:02.840
<v Speaker 1>to sleep in the next couple of weeks. But yeah,

0:27:02.840 --> 0:27:04.520
<v Speaker 1>i'd be sure to check that out over at PF

0:27:04.560 --> 0:27:07.600
<v Speaker 1>dot com. It's available over there, Anthony, great stuff. Freely

0:27:07.640 --> 0:27:10.720
<v Speaker 1>appreciate your time. Thanks for joining us today, of course,

0:27:10.720 --> 0:27:13.959
<v Speaker 1>thanks for having me. I downloaded the Pro Football Focus

0:27:14.040 --> 0:27:18.320
<v Speaker 1>Draft Guide yesterday, and it's impressive since the PFF guys

0:27:18.359 --> 0:27:21.359
<v Speaker 1>are so high on the idea of drafting LSU wide

0:27:21.359 --> 0:27:25.120
<v Speaker 1>receiver Jamar Chase. Here are a few nuggets about him

0:27:25.440 --> 0:27:29.400
<v Speaker 1>that I found interesting. Two years ago with Joe Brewit quarterback,

0:27:29.560 --> 0:27:32.520
<v Speaker 1>Chase caught eighty four of the one hundred twenty one

0:27:32.640 --> 0:27:36.920
<v Speaker 1>passes thrown his way. That's sixty nine percent. But here's

0:27:36.920 --> 0:27:41.560
<v Speaker 1>what's really impressive. We're not talking about screens or easy completions.

0:27:41.960 --> 0:27:47.120
<v Speaker 1>The average distance of those passes was fourteen point three yards,

0:27:47.480 --> 0:27:52.240
<v Speaker 1>and furthermore, Chase averaged eight point one yards after the catch.

0:27:53.080 --> 0:27:55.760
<v Speaker 1>I have consistently been saying that if Piney Sewell is

0:27:55.800 --> 0:27:58.000
<v Speaker 1>on the board at number five, he should be the

0:27:58.040 --> 0:28:01.680
<v Speaker 1>Bengals first round pick. But I've to admit the gang

0:28:01.680 --> 0:28:06.600
<v Speaker 1>at Pro Football Focus has me reconsidering. The Bengals Booth

0:28:06.600 --> 0:28:10.359
<v Speaker 1>podcast is presented by Bud Light Seltzer. It's light and

0:28:10.480 --> 0:28:14.320
<v Speaker 1>refreshing with a hint of fruit flavor. Now time for

0:28:14.359 --> 0:28:26.399
<v Speaker 1>an installment of story Time with Dan. This is something

0:28:26.440 --> 0:28:28.479
<v Speaker 1>I started doing a few years ago when I hosted

0:28:28.520 --> 0:28:32.720
<v Speaker 1>sports talk on WLW Radio. And here's the concept. I've

0:28:32.720 --> 0:28:35.840
<v Speaker 1>been broadcasting in some way, shape or form since weaving

0:28:35.840 --> 0:28:39.080
<v Speaker 1>My Magic on the student radio station at Syracuse University.

0:28:39.400 --> 0:28:42.840
<v Speaker 1>I've had a wide variety of wonderful experiences on and

0:28:43.000 --> 0:28:45.720
<v Speaker 1>off the air and some that weren't quite as wonderful.

0:28:46.040 --> 0:28:49.000
<v Speaker 1>And I'm about to share one this week in story

0:28:49.040 --> 0:28:53.840
<v Speaker 1>Time with Dan. It's my OJ Simpson story. Here goes.

0:28:55.040 --> 0:28:59.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm guessing that for many of you, Ken Anderson, Boome, Osiason,

0:28:59.320 --> 0:29:02.800
<v Speaker 1>Chad John or AJ Green was your childhood sports hero,

0:29:03.360 --> 0:29:06.760
<v Speaker 1>especially if you're a die hard Bengals fan. Well, I

0:29:06.800 --> 0:29:08.960
<v Speaker 1>grew up a little bit south of Buffalo, and my

0:29:09.160 --> 0:29:14.200
<v Speaker 1>childhood sports hero was OJ Simpson. The first NFL game

0:29:14.240 --> 0:29:17.080
<v Speaker 1>I ever attended in person was a Monday night game

0:29:17.120 --> 0:29:20.440
<v Speaker 1>in nineteen seventy three between the Bills and the Kansas

0:29:20.480 --> 0:29:24.520
<v Speaker 1>City Chiefs. That night, OJ st an NFL record at

0:29:24.560 --> 0:29:27.800
<v Speaker 1>the time for carries in a game with thirty nine

0:29:27.840 --> 0:29:30.960
<v Speaker 1>and rushed for one hundred and fifty seven yards. It

0:29:31.080 --> 0:29:34.240
<v Speaker 1>put him over one thousand yards for the season, and

0:29:34.320 --> 0:29:37.680
<v Speaker 1>it was only Week seven that was the year that

0:29:37.720 --> 0:29:40.800
<v Speaker 1>Oj became the first runner in NFL history to top

0:29:40.800 --> 0:29:43.440
<v Speaker 1>the two thousand yard mark, and he did it in

0:29:43.440 --> 0:29:47.600
<v Speaker 1>a fourteen game season. In any case, OJ Simpson was

0:29:47.720 --> 0:29:51.640
<v Speaker 1>my guy. My bedroom walls were a Simpson shrine when

0:29:51.640 --> 0:29:54.000
<v Speaker 1>I was a paper boy. As a kid, I ran

0:29:54.120 --> 0:29:56.800
<v Speaker 1>from house to house pretending that I was the juice.

0:29:57.320 --> 0:30:00.240
<v Speaker 1>And when Buffalo traded him to San Francisco for five

0:30:00.280 --> 0:30:03.520
<v Speaker 1>draft picks in nineteen seventy eight, it might have been

0:30:03.560 --> 0:30:08.120
<v Speaker 1>the saddest day of my childhood. So now let's fast

0:30:08.160 --> 0:30:11.920
<v Speaker 1>forward to adulthood and get to my O. J. Simpson story.

0:30:12.800 --> 0:30:15.440
<v Speaker 1>In nineteen ninety four, the final year of the Bill's

0:30:15.520 --> 0:30:17.719
<v Speaker 1>run of four strade trips to the Super Bowl, I

0:30:17.800 --> 0:30:21.760
<v Speaker 1>was working as a TV sports anchor at WTVH five

0:30:21.800 --> 0:30:25.240
<v Speaker 1>in Syracuse, and I covered a divisional playoff game in

0:30:25.360 --> 0:30:29.640
<v Speaker 1>Buffalo between the Bills and the Raiders. It's notable because

0:30:29.680 --> 0:30:32.920
<v Speaker 1>it's the coldest weather game in Bill's history, and that's

0:30:32.920 --> 0:30:36.720
<v Speaker 1>saying something. The temperature at kickoff was zero and the

0:30:36.760 --> 0:30:41.920
<v Speaker 1>wind chill was minus thirty two. Not quite the Freezer Bowl,

0:30:41.960 --> 0:30:46.360
<v Speaker 1>but definitely bone chilling. My TV station got three press

0:30:46.400 --> 0:30:49.880
<v Speaker 1>passes for every Bill's home game, one for a reporter,

0:30:50.080 --> 0:30:54.200
<v Speaker 1>one for a videographer, and one for a videographer's assistant

0:30:54.440 --> 0:30:57.680
<v Speaker 1>who could help with the equipment. Well, that day, the

0:30:57.760 --> 0:31:03.000
<v Speaker 1>videographer's assistant was my girlfriend and now wife, Peg. It

0:31:03.040 --> 0:31:06.040
<v Speaker 1>was legit. She did help us with the equipment, but

0:31:06.120 --> 0:31:09.440
<v Speaker 1>she was mostly there to watch the game. When we

0:31:09.520 --> 0:31:11.600
<v Speaker 1>got to the stadium, I told her there was no

0:31:11.640 --> 0:31:14.040
<v Speaker 1>way she was going to stay outside in that minus

0:31:14.120 --> 0:31:17.640
<v Speaker 1>thirty two degree winchill. So after we helped the photographer

0:31:17.680 --> 0:31:20.440
<v Speaker 1>with his gear, me and Peg headed for the toasty

0:31:20.520 --> 0:31:23.760
<v Speaker 1>comfort of the press box. But it was a playoff

0:31:23.800 --> 0:31:27.120
<v Speaker 1>game and the press box was packed. Only people that

0:31:27.200 --> 0:31:31.320
<v Speaker 1>specifically had a press box seat could get in. So,

0:31:31.920 --> 0:31:35.920
<v Speaker 1>being a gentleman or idiot, you make the call. I

0:31:36.080 --> 0:31:38.920
<v Speaker 1>told Peg to use my pass for the warm press

0:31:38.960 --> 0:31:41.600
<v Speaker 1>box and I would use the other pass and watch

0:31:41.680 --> 0:31:46.480
<v Speaker 1>the game from the sideline. Bad move. I wasn't quite

0:31:46.520 --> 0:31:49.520
<v Speaker 1>as crazy as Dave Lapham and his fellow offensive lineman

0:31:49.600 --> 0:31:52.400
<v Speaker 1>going with short sleeves in the freezer bowl, but I

0:31:52.480 --> 0:31:55.800
<v Speaker 1>was dressed for going on TV. I had dressed shoes on,

0:31:56.000 --> 0:31:59.000
<v Speaker 1>I didn't have an especially warm winter coat, and there's

0:31:59.080 --> 0:32:01.480
<v Speaker 1>no way I was to make it through four quarters

0:32:01.520 --> 0:32:05.720
<v Speaker 1>in those frigid conditions. So I went looking for a

0:32:05.760 --> 0:32:08.479
<v Speaker 1>warm spot at field level where I could still follow

0:32:08.520 --> 0:32:11.280
<v Speaker 1>the game, and I found one in the Bill's weight room.

0:32:11.800 --> 0:32:14.400
<v Speaker 1>The heat was on. There was a little black and

0:32:14.480 --> 0:32:17.440
<v Speaker 1>white TV, and there was a small group of people

0:32:17.520 --> 0:32:21.760
<v Speaker 1>sitting in front of that TV, the NBC Sports pregame

0:32:21.760 --> 0:32:25.200
<v Speaker 1>show crew, consisting of a few former coaches and players,

0:32:25.200 --> 0:32:30.960
<v Speaker 1>including you guessed it, my childhood hero OJ Simpson. Well,

0:32:30.960 --> 0:32:33.719
<v Speaker 1>this was a dream come true. Not only had I

0:32:33.760 --> 0:32:36.600
<v Speaker 1>found warmth and a TV, but I was about to

0:32:36.600 --> 0:32:40.160
<v Speaker 1>watch an NFL playoff game, basically looking over the shoulder

0:32:40.200 --> 0:32:43.600
<v Speaker 1>of the guy I grew up idolizing. I was one

0:32:43.640 --> 0:32:46.320
<v Speaker 1>of about three or four guys standing there, and as

0:32:46.360 --> 0:32:48.400
<v Speaker 1>we watched the game, we could hear what OJ and

0:32:48.400 --> 0:32:52.560
<v Speaker 1>the other analysts were talking about. And it wasn't strictly

0:32:52.560 --> 0:32:58.000
<v Speaker 1>the game. Let's just say there was some locker room talk. Well.

0:32:58.080 --> 0:33:00.920
<v Speaker 1>Right after he finished telling a story, noticed for the

0:33:00.960 --> 0:33:04.480
<v Speaker 1>first time that they were a handful of strangers standing nearby,

0:33:04.680 --> 0:33:09.560
<v Speaker 1>including yours. Truly, Simpson wasn't pleased, so he summoned a

0:33:09.600 --> 0:33:13.680
<v Speaker 1>security guy who asked us to leave the weight room

0:33:13.720 --> 0:33:17.280
<v Speaker 1>and go back out onto the field. In short o,

0:33:17.520 --> 0:33:20.120
<v Speaker 1>J Simpson forced me to watch the rest of that

0:33:20.160 --> 0:33:24.880
<v Speaker 1>game outdoors in my TV clothes with a minus thirty

0:33:24.880 --> 0:33:28.840
<v Speaker 1>two degree win chill. It's obviously not the worst thing

0:33:28.880 --> 0:33:31.640
<v Speaker 1>he's ever been accused of doing, but it's not exactly

0:33:31.640 --> 0:33:33.760
<v Speaker 1>what you're hoping for the first time you're in the

0:33:33.840 --> 0:33:38.600
<v Speaker 1>presence of your childhood hero. And that concludes this episode

0:33:39.000 --> 0:33:49.520
<v Speaker 1>of story Time with Dan, and that's going to do

0:33:49.560 --> 0:33:51.880
<v Speaker 1>it for this week's episode of The Bengals Booth podcast,

0:33:51.960 --> 0:33:55.320
<v Speaker 1>brought to you by bud Light, Seltzer refreshed the game.

0:33:55.800 --> 0:33:58.239
<v Speaker 1>If you haven't done so already, please subscribe and if

0:33:58.280 --> 0:34:00.280
<v Speaker 1>you have a minute, give it a rating or eric

0:34:00.320 --> 0:34:04.800
<v Speaker 1>comment that helps more Bengals fans find this podcast. I'm

0:34:04.880 --> 0:34:08.160
<v Speaker 1>Dan Horde and thanks for listening to the Bengals Booth

0:34:08.400 --> 0:34:09.040
<v Speaker 1>Podcast