WEBVTT - Episode 426: Who Should The Mariners Take In This Upcoming MLB Draft? With Aram Leighton (Just Baseball)

0:00:00.080 --> 0:00:02.320
<v Speaker 1>Open to episode number four, twenty six of the Marine

0:00:02.400 --> 0:00:05.200
<v Speaker 1>Layer Podcast. We welcome on our friend and recurring guest,

0:00:05.320 --> 0:00:08.160
<v Speaker 1>arm Lighton, the co founder of Just Baseball, to preview

0:00:08.200 --> 0:00:10.520
<v Speaker 1>this twenty twenty six MLB draft, who the Mariners could

0:00:10.520 --> 0:00:13.000
<v Speaker 1>pick at number twenty four, and some updates in the

0:00:13.000 --> 0:00:15.360
<v Speaker 1>Mariners minor league system so far this season.

0:00:16.360 --> 0:00:18.680
<v Speaker 2>Your guys reminder before we start this show, just make

0:00:18.680 --> 0:00:21.080
<v Speaker 2>sure to go download these episodes and please go rate

0:00:21.120 --> 0:00:23.160
<v Speaker 2>and review and leave it five stars if you're listening

0:00:23.239 --> 0:00:26.000
<v Speaker 2>on the audio platforms wherever you might be listening, leave

0:00:26.040 --> 0:00:29.120
<v Speaker 2>that five star review. Hit subscribe on YouTube. If you're watching,

0:00:29.120 --> 0:00:30.680
<v Speaker 2>you guys can see the big red button in front

0:00:30.720 --> 0:00:33.000
<v Speaker 2>of you right, just go hit subscribe. You can look

0:00:33.040 --> 0:00:35.280
<v Speaker 2>at our website and find us on our website, marine

0:00:35.360 --> 0:00:39.800
<v Speaker 2>layerpod dot Com. Episodes are all there, patreons there, podcast

0:00:39.840 --> 0:00:42.760
<v Speaker 2>merch is all there again. That's marine layerpod dot com.

0:00:42.840 --> 0:00:45.120
<v Speaker 2>And check us out on social media. We're posting content

0:00:45.200 --> 0:00:47.960
<v Speaker 2>every day and we're everywhere at marine Layer Pod.

0:00:48.560 --> 0:01:03.880
<v Speaker 1>Let's get it rolling and we welcome you to this

0:01:03.920 --> 0:01:06.440
<v Speaker 1>episode of the Marine Layer Podcast, part of the Just

0:01:06.520 --> 0:01:11.679
<v Speaker 1>Baseball podcast network. Recording here on Tuesday afternoon, July seventh.

0:01:11.760 --> 0:01:14.800
<v Speaker 1>This is before the Mariners start their three game series

0:01:14.800 --> 0:01:17.759
<v Speaker 1>in Miami. We will talk about all the things happening

0:01:17.800 --> 0:01:19.800
<v Speaker 1>with the Mariners down in the state of Florida on

0:01:19.959 --> 0:01:23.520
<v Speaker 1>Friday's Mailbag episode. So just sort of a programming note,

0:01:23.560 --> 0:01:26.399
<v Speaker 1>there will be no current Mariners talk on this episode.

0:01:26.400 --> 0:01:28.000
<v Speaker 1>It will be all in the minor leagues. But we

0:01:28.040 --> 0:01:30.760
<v Speaker 1>do love having arm On. He is as knowledgeable as

0:01:30.760 --> 0:01:32.920
<v Speaker 1>it gets with the draft and with the Mariners minor

0:01:32.959 --> 0:01:33.679
<v Speaker 1>league system.

0:01:34.000 --> 0:01:36.559
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, he's great. I mean, we hit on a bunch

0:01:36.560 --> 0:01:39.320
<v Speaker 2>of different topics here. Everybody wants to hear about caid

0:01:39.360 --> 0:01:41.400
<v Speaker 2>and slow these days, so we hit on those, guys.

0:01:41.680 --> 0:01:44.039
<v Speaker 2>We hit on the promotions to Triple A because, by

0:01:44.040 --> 0:01:48.160
<v Speaker 2>the way, it was after we recorded Monday's episode. Later

0:01:48.240 --> 0:01:50.600
<v Speaker 2>that Sunday night, it was announced that Lads and Arroyo

0:01:50.680 --> 0:01:52.840
<v Speaker 2>were both headed to Triple A. So we talked to

0:01:52.960 --> 0:01:57.000
<v Speaker 2>arm about that because that's obviously very very prospect worthy news.

0:01:57.560 --> 0:02:00.080
<v Speaker 2>And then we get into the draft because as you

0:02:00.120 --> 0:02:02.040
<v Speaker 2>guys are sitting here listening to this, we're like four

0:02:02.120 --> 0:02:04.960
<v Speaker 2>days out from the draft and the Mariners aren't at

0:02:04.960 --> 0:02:06.760
<v Speaker 2>the same spot as they were last year. But that

0:02:06.840 --> 0:02:10.520
<v Speaker 2>doesn't mean there's not intriguing prospects down at that number

0:02:10.560 --> 0:02:12.880
<v Speaker 2>twenty four spot. So we have arm hit on a

0:02:12.880 --> 0:02:15.919
<v Speaker 2>bunch of guys with us, and it's a really fun episode.

0:02:16.480 --> 0:02:18.240
<v Speaker 1>We won't keep you guys any longer. Let's get you

0:02:18.240 --> 0:02:24.079
<v Speaker 1>to that conversation with arm Layton. All right, we welcome

0:02:24.120 --> 0:02:27.280
<v Speaker 1>on our friend and recurring guest, Arm Layton, co founder

0:02:27.320 --> 0:02:31.560
<v Speaker 1>of Just Baseball, Arham, Thanks for hopping on here with us.

0:02:31.919 --> 0:02:34.280
<v Speaker 1>This time of year has to be like the busiest

0:02:34.280 --> 0:02:37.760
<v Speaker 1>possible time for you, right, I mean you've probably been

0:02:37.800 --> 0:02:41.000
<v Speaker 1>prepping for this draft for how long now a little.

0:02:40.760 --> 0:02:42.760
<v Speaker 3>While because it's hard to get a blended in with

0:02:42.800 --> 0:02:44.760
<v Speaker 3>the top one hundred update, which we just put out

0:02:44.760 --> 0:02:47.520
<v Speaker 3>a few weeks ago, and then it's just overdrive trying

0:02:47.520 --> 0:02:50.000
<v Speaker 3>to keep up with as many of the draft reports,

0:02:50.000 --> 0:02:51.880
<v Speaker 3>and thank goodness we have Tyler Jennings who's helped a

0:02:51.919 --> 0:02:54.200
<v Speaker 3>lot on that front too, But just to get as

0:02:54.200 --> 0:02:57.280
<v Speaker 3>deep into the players as possible, and especially this year, man, like,

0:02:57.520 --> 0:03:00.799
<v Speaker 3>I'll never forget your guys' reaction to get Kate Anderson

0:03:00.960 --> 0:03:04.519
<v Speaker 3>last year. Unfortunately, no one like that's gonna just fall

0:03:04.560 --> 0:03:06.519
<v Speaker 3>where there's a no brain or obvious pick.

0:03:06.639 --> 0:03:09.000
<v Speaker 4>So for picks like this.

0:03:09.080 --> 0:03:11.360
<v Speaker 3>And I think this draft in general, there's just so

0:03:11.480 --> 0:03:13.760
<v Speaker 3>many different players that could go in so many different

0:03:13.760 --> 0:03:16.320
<v Speaker 3>spots that I just feel like I gotta keep learning

0:03:16.320 --> 0:03:16.959
<v Speaker 3>and keep learning.

0:03:17.560 --> 0:03:21.200
<v Speaker 1>Okay, we'll talk about the specific players later in this episode,

0:03:21.240 --> 0:03:23.680
<v Speaker 1>but I am curious how long does it take you

0:03:23.760 --> 0:03:26.040
<v Speaker 1>to put together like a mock draft, Like what goes

0:03:26.080 --> 0:03:26.520
<v Speaker 1>into that.

0:03:27.680 --> 0:03:30.040
<v Speaker 3>Thank goodness for Tyler Jennings. Before we had Tyler and

0:03:30.080 --> 0:03:33.960
<v Speaker 3>when it was all just me doing it, Oh gosh,

0:03:34.040 --> 0:03:37.640
<v Speaker 3>it just depended on how accurate quote unquote I wanted

0:03:37.680 --> 0:03:39.160
<v Speaker 3>to try to be on a pick, but as I

0:03:39.200 --> 0:03:41.440
<v Speaker 3>started to realize, it's kind of an exercise in futility.

0:03:41.560 --> 0:03:43.400
<v Speaker 3>You just try to gather as much info as you can,

0:03:44.760 --> 0:03:46.960
<v Speaker 3>figure out which players you think kind of fit that

0:03:47.040 --> 0:03:49.960
<v Speaker 3>description there, and just go with it. The part that

0:03:50.000 --> 0:03:52.880
<v Speaker 3>I think takes the longest is really like the player

0:03:53.320 --> 0:03:56.400
<v Speaker 3>breakdowns and just kind of understanding their strengths, their weaknesses

0:03:56.920 --> 0:04:01.000
<v Speaker 3>and everything in between, because the college day you usually

0:04:01.000 --> 0:04:02.920
<v Speaker 3>got to sift through it. There's some pitches that are

0:04:02.960 --> 0:04:06.280
<v Speaker 3>tagged really poorly. Uh, the pitch shapes aren't accurate, so

0:04:06.280 --> 0:04:08.400
<v Speaker 3>you got to kind of like fix all of that

0:04:08.680 --> 0:04:11.600
<v Speaker 3>and then go through it all. And again, Tyler does

0:04:11.600 --> 0:04:14.600
<v Speaker 3>an amazing job too with the high school guys, Like

0:04:14.840 --> 0:04:17.160
<v Speaker 3>he's getting live looks and we're talking about that.

0:04:17.320 --> 0:04:21.279
<v Speaker 4>So there's a lot more of just like a.

0:04:20.279 --> 0:04:23.159
<v Speaker 3>Detail oriented process where you're go into all these different areas,

0:04:23.160 --> 0:04:25.440
<v Speaker 3>where with the minor league prospects, the data is a

0:04:25.480 --> 0:04:27.880
<v Speaker 3>little bit more easy to follow. I can watch video

0:04:27.920 --> 0:04:29.599
<v Speaker 3>on them, it's a little bit more easy for me

0:04:29.640 --> 0:04:32.080
<v Speaker 3>to see them live. And but even that process takes

0:04:32.080 --> 0:04:33.600
<v Speaker 3>a while. But I would say that the like the

0:04:34.080 --> 0:04:37.480
<v Speaker 3>player breakdowns, is really what takes a while, and the

0:04:37.520 --> 0:04:39.760
<v Speaker 3>tool grades and the pitch grades and all that stuff.

0:04:39.800 --> 0:04:41.240
<v Speaker 4>But that's the fun part of it.

0:04:41.720 --> 0:04:44.919
<v Speaker 2>Which is why your drafts, why your mock drafts, and

0:04:44.960 --> 0:04:46.960
<v Speaker 2>your prospect updates are as good as they get like

0:04:47.000 --> 0:04:49.920
<v Speaker 2>other outlets do them. But arm really really goes into

0:04:49.960 --> 0:04:52.440
<v Speaker 2>the weeds of these breakdowns. So again, if you're looking

0:04:52.480 --> 0:04:54.480
<v Speaker 2>for draft breakdowns as we lead up to Sunday, if

0:04:54.480 --> 0:04:56.840
<v Speaker 2>you're looking for prospect stuff, I mean, just go right

0:04:56.880 --> 0:04:59.479
<v Speaker 2>over to just Baseball dot com. Speaking of that, like,

0:04:59.480 --> 0:05:01.520
<v Speaker 2>we're gonna get into a bunch of stuff in this episode,

0:05:01.560 --> 0:05:04.640
<v Speaker 2>Like TJ mentioned, the draft, a bunch of prospects, and

0:05:04.680 --> 0:05:06.600
<v Speaker 2>we'll get into a couple of promotions here in a minute.

0:05:06.680 --> 0:05:11.039
<v Speaker 2>But just since you mentioned us all being together last

0:05:11.040 --> 0:05:13.200
<v Speaker 2>summer at All Star Week and TJ and I's reaction

0:05:13.240 --> 0:05:17.280
<v Speaker 2>to Kate Anderson falling to number three, since you brought

0:05:17.279 --> 0:05:19.599
<v Speaker 2>it up, I figured i'd just start here. I feel

0:05:19.600 --> 0:05:23.799
<v Speaker 2>like our reaction back then has now been pretty warranted.

0:05:23.400 --> 0:05:24.560
<v Speaker 5>As we look a year later.

0:05:24.920 --> 0:05:27.960
<v Speaker 2>But I'll ask you, what does Kaid continue to improve

0:05:27.960 --> 0:05:31.000
<v Speaker 2>on from your eyes from that College World Series start

0:05:31.040 --> 0:05:33.640
<v Speaker 2>where he went complete game to what he's doing now,

0:05:33.680 --> 0:05:34.800
<v Speaker 2>which has been off the charts.

0:05:35.000 --> 0:05:37.280
<v Speaker 3>It's funny, I was thinking about that before we started recording.

0:05:37.279 --> 0:05:39.279
<v Speaker 3>I was like, based on the way Caid's thrown now,

0:05:39.480 --> 0:05:40.800
<v Speaker 3>it was actually an underreaction.

0:05:41.360 --> 0:05:43.279
<v Speaker 4>I think. I think you guys actually could.

0:05:43.080 --> 0:05:45.000
<v Speaker 3>Have had more in there, because he's been one of

0:05:45.000 --> 0:05:48.920
<v Speaker 3>the most dominant minor league pitchers I can remember. And

0:05:49.080 --> 0:05:51.479
<v Speaker 3>what I keep going back to, and I just I

0:05:51.520 --> 0:05:54.200
<v Speaker 3>can't really escape this is that to me, he looks

0:05:54.320 --> 0:05:58.080
<v Speaker 3>like a big league vet rehabbing in the minor leagues,

0:05:58.560 --> 0:06:01.039
<v Speaker 3>and I think that's the biggest thing we saw Kate

0:06:01.080 --> 0:06:04.599
<v Speaker 3>Anderson execute and just be more polished than his peers.

0:06:04.600 --> 0:06:08.239
<v Speaker 3>In college, but the degree at which he's executing now

0:06:08.920 --> 0:06:10.960
<v Speaker 3>is just on a different level.

0:06:11.040 --> 0:06:11.800
<v Speaker 4>I mean, even when.

0:06:11.720 --> 0:06:15.640
<v Speaker 3>You look at what he did last at LSU, every

0:06:15.640 --> 0:06:17.480
<v Speaker 3>once in a while he'd leave that heater up, or

0:06:17.480 --> 0:06:20.040
<v Speaker 3>every once in a while, you know, he'd hang the slider.

0:06:20.520 --> 0:06:22.120
<v Speaker 4>He's like never doing that now.

0:06:22.240 --> 0:06:25.719
<v Speaker 3>It's almost like he's a robot and you've seen the

0:06:25.760 --> 0:06:28.200
<v Speaker 3>stuff improve a little bit, just in terms of the

0:06:28.240 --> 0:06:31.040
<v Speaker 3>life on the heater. And I also think the other aspect,

0:06:31.040 --> 0:06:33.360
<v Speaker 3>and this was something that I talked about with Justin

0:06:33.400 --> 0:06:36.400
<v Speaker 3>Toole at the start of the season during spring training,

0:06:36.520 --> 0:06:39.880
<v Speaker 3>is just Anderson really buying into just all of the

0:06:39.920 --> 0:06:42.000
<v Speaker 3>other aspects when the Mariners, the way that they approach

0:06:42.080 --> 0:06:43.840
<v Speaker 3>things on the mound and what they like to preach,

0:06:43.880 --> 0:06:46.360
<v Speaker 3>and the way that they want guys to attack hitters,

0:06:46.400 --> 0:06:48.720
<v Speaker 3>and just the routine and all the little aspects as

0:06:48.720 --> 0:06:50.640
<v Speaker 3>well that I think is just taking Kate Anderson to

0:06:51.000 --> 0:06:53.839
<v Speaker 3>another level and has him carrying himself like a vet.

0:06:53.880 --> 0:06:56.080
<v Speaker 4>But it really is the execution.

0:06:55.680 --> 0:06:57.760
<v Speaker 3>Across the entire arsenal where it seems like he can

0:06:57.800 --> 0:07:00.760
<v Speaker 3>go to any pitch in any count and he's just

0:07:00.839 --> 0:07:02.400
<v Speaker 3>toying with hitters. And it's been one of the more

0:07:02.440 --> 0:07:04.919
<v Speaker 3>fun Like he is a guy that you can watch

0:07:05.000 --> 0:07:08.320
<v Speaker 3>the whole start and it's just as satisfying and aesthetically

0:07:08.400 --> 0:07:10.880
<v Speaker 3>pleasing to watch because of how repeatable the delivery is,

0:07:11.120 --> 0:07:13.560
<v Speaker 3>how confident he is in every offering, and really the

0:07:13.600 --> 0:07:15.840
<v Speaker 3>way he can just toy with these double A hitters.

0:07:16.640 --> 0:07:19.160
<v Speaker 1>What's the difference from what Caid's doing this year to

0:07:19.200 --> 0:07:21.600
<v Speaker 1>what Trey's Savage did last year for the Blue Jays.

0:07:23.400 --> 0:07:25.920
<v Speaker 3>I think what Caid's doing this year is like more

0:07:25.960 --> 0:07:30.280
<v Speaker 3>consistent y Savage, you had this outlier type of guy

0:07:30.400 --> 0:07:32.680
<v Speaker 3>that like, of course when he got up to the

0:07:32.720 --> 0:07:34.760
<v Speaker 3>big leagues it was just a different level. He got

0:07:34.800 --> 0:07:36.760
<v Speaker 3>hot and it was incredible, and I think he's obviously

0:07:36.800 --> 0:07:39.440
<v Speaker 3>a very special arm. The difference, I guess is that

0:07:39.760 --> 0:07:42.880
<v Speaker 3>y Savage was moved so quickly through the level, was

0:07:42.920 --> 0:07:45.320
<v Speaker 3>that like you never really got to see him fully.

0:07:45.320 --> 0:07:47.680
<v Speaker 3>You have to like repeat what he was doing at

0:07:47.680 --> 0:07:49.160
<v Speaker 3>one stop. And then he got up to the big

0:07:49.240 --> 0:07:53.040
<v Speaker 3>leagues and again just hot outlier look with the high.

0:07:52.800 --> 0:07:55.360
<v Speaker 4>Release and the splitter and it just it just worked.

0:07:55.560 --> 0:07:58.400
<v Speaker 3>But with y Savage, it was like station to station

0:07:58.480 --> 0:08:00.960
<v Speaker 3>to station really quickly, and we never saw him throw

0:08:01.000 --> 0:08:03.240
<v Speaker 3>more than thirty three innings at one spot, which was

0:08:03.320 --> 0:08:05.520
<v Speaker 3>low a by the way, in twenty twenty five, that

0:08:05.600 --> 0:08:07.720
<v Speaker 3>was his longest day before he got to the show.

0:08:07.960 --> 0:08:10.680
<v Speaker 3>Whereas when I look at Cade, like, this is a

0:08:10.680 --> 0:08:13.920
<v Speaker 3>guy that just was aggressively assigned, you know, and is

0:08:13.960 --> 0:08:15.040
<v Speaker 3>being challenged.

0:08:14.640 --> 0:08:16.000
<v Speaker 4>Immediately Inaa would.

0:08:16.000 --> 0:08:18.800
<v Speaker 3>By the way that the ball in the minor leagues

0:08:18.800 --> 0:08:21.560
<v Speaker 3>this year, I think there's something going on. It is flying.

0:08:21.680 --> 0:08:23.320
<v Speaker 3>You have guys with the same batted ball data the

0:08:23.320 --> 0:08:25.840
<v Speaker 3>head the year before, hitting way more homers. You have

0:08:26.280 --> 0:08:29.440
<v Speaker 3>you know, an eight seventy ops in the Texas League

0:08:29.440 --> 0:08:31.960
<v Speaker 3>where Kid's at right now, equating to like a one

0:08:31.920 --> 0:08:33.880
<v Speaker 3>to twenty three WRC plus, And it's like, how is

0:08:33.880 --> 0:08:37.520
<v Speaker 3>that only twenty three percent above average? Everyone's launching balls,

0:08:37.679 --> 0:08:40.280
<v Speaker 3>and that's the craziest part. Was like even you Savage

0:08:40.280 --> 0:08:41.640
<v Speaker 3>every once in a while, you know, he'd get he'd

0:08:41.640 --> 0:08:42.400
<v Speaker 3>get clipped by a.

0:08:42.360 --> 0:08:43.960
<v Speaker 4>Long ball when he was in the minor leagues.

0:08:43.960 --> 0:08:46.760
<v Speaker 3>And when you look at what Kate Anderson has done

0:08:46.880 --> 0:08:49.800
<v Speaker 3>is like nobody is even clipping him. Like he's given

0:08:49.880 --> 0:08:51.520
<v Speaker 3>up four home runs on the season. A couple of

0:08:51.520 --> 0:08:55.160
<v Speaker 3>those came more recently, but minimal hard contact if he

0:08:55.200 --> 0:08:56.600
<v Speaker 3>does give up a homer, it feels like it's a

0:08:56.600 --> 0:08:59.440
<v Speaker 3>solo shot. And it just the ability to limit damage.

0:08:59.480 --> 0:09:02.800
<v Speaker 3>A two already slugging against a one ninety five on

0:09:02.840 --> 0:09:03.800
<v Speaker 3>base percentage allowed.

0:09:03.800 --> 0:09:05.440
<v Speaker 4>It is just no one's doing that.

0:09:06.440 --> 0:09:10.720
<v Speaker 1>Answer me this. I thought the ball was different between

0:09:10.760 --> 0:09:12.400
<v Speaker 1>Double A and Triple A. Is it the same?

0:09:12.520 --> 0:09:16.480
<v Speaker 3>Now it's it's it's flying like it's the same across

0:09:16.480 --> 0:09:18.439
<v Speaker 3>the minor leagues. It is supposed to be different, and

0:09:18.520 --> 0:09:21.600
<v Speaker 3>it is different. But I don't know what's going on

0:09:21.640 --> 0:09:23.000
<v Speaker 3>in Double A and High A.

0:09:23.360 --> 0:09:24.319
<v Speaker 4>But the ball is.

0:09:24.320 --> 0:09:26.880
<v Speaker 3>Flying, flying, flying, flying, and it is a different ball.

0:09:26.880 --> 0:09:28.520
<v Speaker 3>The Triple A ball is supposed to be more similar

0:09:28.559 --> 0:09:32.400
<v Speaker 3>to the big league ball. But every checkpoint I've seen

0:09:32.440 --> 0:09:35.559
<v Speaker 3>in Hi A and Double A, and this is the

0:09:35.640 --> 0:09:37.440
<v Speaker 3>thing going to dive into on the other side of

0:09:37.760 --> 0:09:40.200
<v Speaker 3>All Star Week, just because we're getting through All Star Week.

0:09:40.480 --> 0:09:42.559
<v Speaker 3>But I really want to compare the batted ball data,

0:09:42.679 --> 0:09:44.200
<v Speaker 3>like the home run to fly ball right, like what

0:09:44.280 --> 0:09:46.160
<v Speaker 3>percentage of fly balls are leaving the yard compared to

0:09:46.200 --> 0:09:49.320
<v Speaker 3>previous years at each league, because something's fishy for sure,

0:09:49.360 --> 0:09:51.600
<v Speaker 3>and I think that only validates what Kate Anderson's doing

0:09:51.600 --> 0:09:52.040
<v Speaker 3>even more.

0:09:53.080 --> 0:09:56.200
<v Speaker 1>What does cad How does Kaid stack up historically against

0:09:56.200 --> 0:09:58.360
<v Speaker 1>some other performances you've seen in the minors.

0:09:59.000 --> 0:10:02.560
<v Speaker 3>Man, I was thinking about the other day, and I

0:10:02.600 --> 0:10:05.400
<v Speaker 3>can't really think of a player in recent memory. And

0:10:05.400 --> 0:10:09.040
<v Speaker 3>I'm sure like some people could dig one up really

0:10:09.080 --> 0:10:10.959
<v Speaker 3>really quickly and be like, oh, this was this was

0:10:11.120 --> 0:10:13.320
<v Speaker 3>maybe a comparable type of performance.

0:10:13.360 --> 0:10:15.320
<v Speaker 4>But one hundred and eight strikeouts.

0:10:14.840 --> 0:10:18.120
<v Speaker 3>To ten walks in Double A and that's your first

0:10:18.160 --> 0:10:21.679
<v Speaker 3>pro season at the level. I can't think of somebody

0:10:21.720 --> 0:10:25.400
<v Speaker 3>off the top of my head that's done that anytime recently,

0:10:26.400 --> 0:10:29.120
<v Speaker 3>especially in that Texas League. So I'm sure once we

0:10:29.160 --> 0:10:31.160
<v Speaker 3>get off like one will come to me. But on

0:10:31.200 --> 0:10:34.839
<v Speaker 3>the spot, dude, like the balance of command and with

0:10:35.040 --> 0:10:36.840
<v Speaker 3>where he's striking out forty percent of guys too, it's

0:10:36.840 --> 0:10:40.079
<v Speaker 3>a whip below point seven. I can't think of a

0:10:40.120 --> 0:10:42.800
<v Speaker 3>player like that doing this in his first pro season.

0:10:43.679 --> 0:10:46.319
<v Speaker 2>Would he benefit anything from going to Triple A because

0:10:46.360 --> 0:10:49.160
<v Speaker 2>often teams keep their prospects away from the PCL and

0:10:49.200 --> 0:10:51.520
<v Speaker 2>away from Triple A because the ball flies and it

0:10:51.520 --> 0:10:54.439
<v Speaker 2>doesn't do much for your development. That being said, I

0:10:54.520 --> 0:10:56.920
<v Speaker 2>just don't know what it is challenging him at this

0:10:56.920 --> 0:10:58.520
<v Speaker 2>point in Double A so I've been curious to pick

0:10:58.559 --> 0:10:59.319
<v Speaker 2>your brain about that.

0:10:59.760 --> 0:11:02.520
<v Speaker 3>It's It's funny, like at first I was always thinking, oh,

0:11:02.600 --> 0:11:06.199
<v Speaker 3>what's the point, But honestly, like, if you can keep

0:11:06.200 --> 0:11:09.360
<v Speaker 3>limiting damage there like that, you'll be able to do

0:11:09.400 --> 0:11:11.000
<v Speaker 3>it at the show too. And in terms of what

0:11:11.040 --> 0:11:13.120
<v Speaker 3>the PCL is, the other aspect is maybe just getting

0:11:13.120 --> 0:11:15.560
<v Speaker 3>a little bit more accustomed to throwing with, you know,

0:11:15.600 --> 0:11:17.400
<v Speaker 3>a big league type of ball. The seams are tighter

0:11:17.440 --> 0:11:19.080
<v Speaker 3>and all those different things. Is that's the one thing

0:11:19.120 --> 0:11:22.120
<v Speaker 3>I have noticed very much is you see these these

0:11:22.160 --> 0:11:23.719
<v Speaker 3>pitching prospects. And I don't think it's gonna be a

0:11:23.720 --> 0:11:25.880
<v Speaker 3>prolem for Anderson obviously, but a lot of even top

0:11:25.880 --> 0:11:28.160
<v Speaker 3>pitching prospects, they get to trip a a they lose

0:11:28.200 --> 0:11:30.120
<v Speaker 3>a couple of inches of vert on the fastball, maybe

0:11:30.120 --> 0:11:32.080
<v Speaker 3>they don't trust the fastball as much, and then.

0:11:32.000 --> 0:11:34.160
<v Speaker 4>They start nibbling a little more. The walk rate creeps up.

0:11:34.400 --> 0:11:36.400
<v Speaker 3>It's a little bit slicker, the seams are a little

0:11:36.400 --> 0:11:38.600
<v Speaker 3>bit flatter, and they just don't have the same grip

0:11:38.640 --> 0:11:40.880
<v Speaker 3>and it takes some time to kind of find that feel.

0:11:41.480 --> 0:11:42.959
<v Speaker 4>You can also just do that immediately up at the

0:11:42.960 --> 0:11:43.680
<v Speaker 4>big league level.

0:11:43.840 --> 0:11:46.959
<v Speaker 3>But if we're already just watching this like this exercise

0:11:47.040 --> 0:11:49.240
<v Speaker 3>of Oh, Kate Anderson goes out, Kate Anderson dominates.

0:11:49.240 --> 0:11:50.760
<v Speaker 4>Okay, we wait for him to go and pitch again.

0:11:51.480 --> 0:11:52.959
<v Speaker 3>It may not be a bad thing to just give

0:11:53.040 --> 0:11:56.599
<v Speaker 3>him a variable if he gives up three homers in

0:11:56.840 --> 0:11:58.520
<v Speaker 3>a start in the PCL. I think this guy's even

0:11:58.559 --> 0:12:00.880
<v Speaker 3>keeled enough to know that it's not. He doesn't need

0:12:00.920 --> 0:12:03.679
<v Speaker 3>to change anything, so as it pretends to like throwing

0:12:04.040 --> 0:12:05.800
<v Speaker 3>with a baseball closer to what you'd be throwing with

0:12:05.840 --> 0:12:08.280
<v Speaker 3>in the big leagues, and maybe just shaking things up

0:12:08.280 --> 0:12:10.720
<v Speaker 3>a little bit so he's not throwing stand in bullpens.

0:12:10.720 --> 0:12:13.240
<v Speaker 3>It seems like it may not be a bad idea.

0:12:15.120 --> 0:12:17.720
<v Speaker 1>Let us tell you guys about Emerald Queen Casino's summer

0:12:17.800 --> 0:12:20.120
<v Speaker 1>lineup of shows. Let me know if this sounds good.

0:12:20.160 --> 0:12:23.360
<v Speaker 1>War visits equc on July seventeenth, less than two weeks

0:12:23.360 --> 0:12:26.760
<v Speaker 1>from now, Brandley Gilbert on August twenty second, and Pete

0:12:26.840 --> 0:12:30.600
<v Speaker 1>Davidson visits Tacoma on August twenty eighth. If you want tickets,

0:12:30.880 --> 0:12:33.520
<v Speaker 1>go to Emeraldqueen dot com. Emerald Queen Casino is the

0:12:33.640 --> 0:12:36.720
<v Speaker 1>entertainment capital of the Northwest. And while you're there, and

0:12:36.760 --> 0:12:38.760
<v Speaker 1>if you're trying to watch the Mariners or any other

0:12:38.800 --> 0:12:41.920
<v Speaker 1>sports this summer, go check out the bet MGM Sportsbook.

0:12:41.960 --> 0:12:44.600
<v Speaker 1>There is no better place to watch the game. Seventy

0:12:44.679 --> 0:12:47.680
<v Speaker 1>dream SAT loungers for premium viewing, dozens of eighty six

0:12:47.720 --> 0:12:51.040
<v Speaker 1>inch TVs, legal wagering on college and pro sports. You

0:12:51.080 --> 0:12:54.240
<v Speaker 1>can download the bet EQUC app for live wagering anywhere

0:12:54.240 --> 0:12:56.760
<v Speaker 1>on the property. Catch every sport and every play at

0:12:56.760 --> 0:13:00.000
<v Speaker 1>Emerald Queen Casino. For more details, visit Emerald Queen Day.

0:13:00.600 --> 0:13:07.320
<v Speaker 1>Please game responsibly. There's some other Mariners prospect news this week.

0:13:07.320 --> 0:13:09.839
<v Speaker 1>They have a couple of promotions with Lazara Montes and

0:13:09.880 --> 0:13:12.600
<v Speaker 1>Michael Royal. Speaking of Triple A moving up to Triple

0:13:12.640 --> 0:13:15.280
<v Speaker 1>A Tacoma this week, why do you think the Mariners

0:13:15.280 --> 0:13:17.239
<v Speaker 1>decided they were going to do this now.

0:13:17.520 --> 0:13:21.360
<v Speaker 3>With with with A Royal and Las Yeah, I don't know.

0:13:21.880 --> 0:13:24.960
<v Speaker 3>With a Royo, I see the fit right where it's like,

0:13:25.320 --> 0:13:27.280
<v Speaker 3>you guys got to figure out a way to hit lefties,

0:13:27.480 --> 0:13:30.880
<v Speaker 3>and Arroyo is a guy that's kind of built I

0:13:30.880 --> 0:13:33.040
<v Speaker 3>think to be able to do that. And there's certain

0:13:33.040 --> 0:13:36.200
<v Speaker 3>players that they don't hit lefties, you know, as well

0:13:36.240 --> 0:13:37.800
<v Speaker 3>as you'd expect in the minor leagues, but then they

0:13:37.800 --> 0:13:39.720
<v Speaker 3>get up to the big leagues and they handle lefties

0:13:39.920 --> 0:13:42.160
<v Speaker 3>a little bit more easily or more quickly than they

0:13:42.160 --> 0:13:45.320
<v Speaker 3>would have. You know, I handled the righty's what getting

0:13:45.400 --> 0:13:47.880
<v Speaker 3>up there, just because everything's breaking towards them. You're not

0:13:47.920 --> 0:13:50.320
<v Speaker 3>dealing with right on right sweepers and all these nastier

0:13:50.440 --> 0:13:51.120
<v Speaker 3>sharper stuff.

0:13:51.400 --> 0:13:53.080
<v Speaker 4>And with a Royal, I just I feel like the

0:13:53.120 --> 0:13:54.760
<v Speaker 4>way that he has swung en of late too.

0:13:55.000 --> 0:13:58.360
<v Speaker 3>He's been on a different level since maybe about a

0:13:58.400 --> 0:14:00.280
<v Speaker 3>month and a half ago, I mean, and it has

0:14:00.320 --> 0:14:02.280
<v Speaker 3>been just ridiculous, ridiculous numbers.

0:14:02.480 --> 0:14:03.120
<v Speaker 4>And I also just.

0:14:03.040 --> 0:14:06.520
<v Speaker 3>Think about the comfort and playing different spots now and

0:14:06.800 --> 0:14:09.040
<v Speaker 3>he's starting to play or continuing to play a good

0:14:09.040 --> 0:14:09.920
<v Speaker 3>amount of left field.

0:14:10.480 --> 0:14:11.359
<v Speaker 4>I'm just thinking.

0:14:11.080 --> 0:14:13.240
<v Speaker 3>About you're hoping that the Mariners are going to go

0:14:13.280 --> 0:14:15.839
<v Speaker 3>out and get that short platoon guy because Rob Refsnyder

0:14:15.920 --> 0:14:18.560
<v Speaker 3>is not really doing it, and I was really hoping

0:14:18.600 --> 0:14:20.880
<v Speaker 3>Brendan Davis would get his opportunity, but of course the

0:14:20.920 --> 0:14:23.920
<v Speaker 3>hamstring issue and even then, like we're kind of digging

0:14:23.920 --> 0:14:26.480
<v Speaker 3>around here to find that short platoon guy. I think

0:14:26.520 --> 0:14:28.640
<v Speaker 3>for for a royal like that seems to be a

0:14:28.720 --> 0:14:30.840
<v Speaker 3>role that I could see him very much succeed And

0:14:30.840 --> 0:14:33.160
<v Speaker 3>and again I know it's been slightly reverse splits, but

0:14:33.360 --> 0:14:34.920
<v Speaker 3>I wouldn't expect it to go that way in the

0:14:34.960 --> 0:14:39.000
<v Speaker 3>big leagues. Everything breaking towards him. He demolishes lefty fastballs.

0:14:39.040 --> 0:14:40.400
<v Speaker 3>I think he'd be able to handle it, and I

0:14:40.400 --> 0:14:43.120
<v Speaker 3>think you'd see those splits normalize with laz I think

0:14:43.120 --> 0:14:46.560
<v Speaker 3>it's just kind of time, I guess. But at the

0:14:46.640 --> 0:14:49.920
<v Speaker 3>same time, he's one where it's a triple A is

0:14:49.920 --> 0:14:52.080
<v Speaker 3>gonna be easier for him. So that was where it

0:14:52.120 --> 0:14:55.040
<v Speaker 3>was a little surprising for me. But you also had

0:14:55.080 --> 0:14:57.440
<v Speaker 3>sixty four games in double A last year for last

0:14:57.440 --> 0:14:59.760
<v Speaker 3>where he was twenty two percent better than league average,

0:15:00.160 --> 0:15:03.560
<v Speaker 3>another seventy nine games at double A where he's now

0:15:03.800 --> 0:15:06.320
<v Speaker 3>forty four percent better than the league average. Those swing

0:15:06.320 --> 0:15:08.280
<v Speaker 3>and miss has been roughly the same. It's just kinda

0:15:08.960 --> 0:15:10.480
<v Speaker 3>might as well just push him up to trip a

0:15:10.480 --> 0:15:12.840
<v Speaker 3>A and get him a step away from the big leagues.

0:15:13.280 --> 0:15:15.800
<v Speaker 3>The funny thing with Lazo is like I think he'll

0:15:15.800 --> 0:15:18.640
<v Speaker 3>probably end up wiffing less in the PCL and he's

0:15:18.680 --> 0:15:22.120
<v Speaker 3>definitely gonna hit more home runs. So with his power

0:15:22.240 --> 0:15:24.880
<v Speaker 3>in that environment, like it's gonna be a match made

0:15:24.880 --> 0:15:26.640
<v Speaker 3>in heaven, and maybe he gets hot and if you

0:15:26.640 --> 0:15:28.520
<v Speaker 3>need a bat, you bring him up, or maybe he

0:15:28.600 --> 0:15:30.560
<v Speaker 3>torches the level and I know Mariners fans are gonna

0:15:30.600 --> 0:15:32.080
<v Speaker 3>like shiver there, but that could be a guy that

0:15:32.080 --> 0:15:33.480
<v Speaker 3>you dangle in a potential trade.

0:15:33.840 --> 0:15:34.240
<v Speaker 4>Mm hmm.

0:15:35.000 --> 0:15:38.520
<v Speaker 2>So do you think the Mariners are essentially just accepting

0:15:38.880 --> 0:15:41.280
<v Speaker 2>he's always gonna strike out at a really high rate,

0:15:41.320 --> 0:15:43.920
<v Speaker 2>because I guess my take was, as somebody who's not

0:15:43.960 --> 0:15:47.160
<v Speaker 2>a prospect expert, I always figured he's gonna have to

0:15:47.160 --> 0:15:49.200
<v Speaker 2>cut the k rate down before they ever promote him.

0:15:49.240 --> 0:15:52.480
<v Speaker 2>But they promoted him and he's still striking out over

0:15:52.560 --> 0:15:54.880
<v Speaker 2>thirty percent of the time. So is this just the

0:15:54.880 --> 0:15:58.560
<v Speaker 2>Mariners essentially accepting who he'll be as a hitter.

0:15:59.440 --> 0:15:59.920
<v Speaker 4>I think so.

0:16:01.120 --> 0:16:03.920
<v Speaker 3>You know, there's always the hope that it can happen,

0:16:04.160 --> 0:16:06.640
<v Speaker 3>you know, later on or whatever. But I think just

0:16:07.120 --> 0:16:10.640
<v Speaker 3>because he's also productive, it puts him in a weird

0:16:10.680 --> 0:16:13.160
<v Speaker 3>spat and you don't want him to get like stale

0:16:13.160 --> 0:16:16.840
<v Speaker 3>at the level and stagnate. And it's twenty five homers

0:16:16.840 --> 0:16:19.400
<v Speaker 3>in seventy nine games, and I think at this point

0:16:19.440 --> 0:16:22.400
<v Speaker 3>it's it's kind of a matter of just trying to

0:16:22.600 --> 0:16:25.120
<v Speaker 3>challenge him now with maybe guys that aren't gonna have

0:16:25.120 --> 0:16:27.000
<v Speaker 3>as good as stuff and maybe can execute a little

0:16:27.040 --> 0:16:29.280
<v Speaker 3>bit more, and then just ultimately, I think the the

0:16:29.760 --> 0:16:32.480
<v Speaker 3>only test, the only way to really because how are

0:16:32.520 --> 0:16:35.000
<v Speaker 3>you gonna convince lazarro Montest to make a swing adjustment

0:16:35.040 --> 0:16:36.920
<v Speaker 3>right now? Like, yes, I'm sure he'd want to swing

0:16:36.960 --> 0:16:39.640
<v Speaker 3>and miss less, but he's on pace for fifty homers almost,

0:16:39.680 --> 0:16:41.480
<v Speaker 3>Like how do you convince that guy to swing? Like

0:16:41.520 --> 0:16:44.480
<v Speaker 3>to swing differently? And when I talked to the Mariners

0:16:44.720 --> 0:16:47.280
<v Speaker 3>brass before, like when I talked to some people before

0:16:47.400 --> 0:16:49.240
<v Speaker 3>the start of the season, I kind of ask him

0:16:49.240 --> 0:16:52.120
<v Speaker 3>like big barrel tip, like he really gets his hands

0:16:52.160 --> 0:16:54.760
<v Speaker 3>out there, Like are there any things you'd want to adjust? Like, no,

0:16:54.840 --> 0:16:59.160
<v Speaker 3>We're more focused on approach, all right, So I don't know.

0:16:59.400 --> 0:17:01.800
<v Speaker 3>It's a very interesting situation. But when you look at

0:17:01.800 --> 0:17:05.560
<v Speaker 3>you las, like sixty percent contact rate at double A,

0:17:07.040 --> 0:17:10.639
<v Speaker 3>the odds of that translating to big league success as

0:17:10.680 --> 0:17:13.280
<v Speaker 3>currently constructed are are swim because you would have to

0:17:13.320 --> 0:17:17.399
<v Speaker 3>have him maintain that contact rate exactly and he'd still

0:17:17.440 --> 0:17:20.080
<v Speaker 3>be among the lowest in Major League Baseball. You'd be

0:17:20.119 --> 0:17:22.840
<v Speaker 3>hoping for like that Murakami type of outcome, but Murakami

0:17:22.880 --> 0:17:23.640
<v Speaker 3>doesn't chase at all.

0:17:23.960 --> 0:17:25.080
<v Speaker 4>Laz has gotten better with.

0:17:25.000 --> 0:17:27.560
<v Speaker 3>The swing decisions, but he's still he's still right around

0:17:27.600 --> 0:17:30.880
<v Speaker 3>average in terms of the chase rate. So I can't

0:17:30.960 --> 0:17:33.600
<v Speaker 3>really make too much of I can't totally figure out

0:17:33.640 --> 0:17:36.479
<v Speaker 3>what the move would be other than it just get

0:17:36.560 --> 0:17:38.880
<v Speaker 3>him one step closer to the big leagues and get

0:17:38.920 --> 0:17:41.120
<v Speaker 3>him hot, because you know he's gonna get hot up there.

0:17:42.520 --> 0:17:45.960
<v Speaker 1>What is Kyle Schwarber's contact rate? Because that feels like

0:17:46.000 --> 0:17:48.879
<v Speaker 1>a best case scenario for Laz where he's gonna walk

0:17:48.960 --> 0:17:51.760
<v Speaker 1>a ton, he's gonna hit the ball really really far,

0:17:51.840 --> 0:17:54.640
<v Speaker 1>but he'll still pile up his strikeouts. So where where

0:17:54.720 --> 0:17:55.120
<v Speaker 1>is that at?

0:17:55.240 --> 0:17:55.680
<v Speaker 4>Yeah?

0:17:55.400 --> 0:17:58.120
<v Speaker 3>When when I brought up that, like that hot end

0:17:58.119 --> 0:18:00.640
<v Speaker 3>outcome on the radio show, that that was kind enough

0:18:00.640 --> 0:18:02.000
<v Speaker 3>to bring me on to I'm sorry, I can't remember

0:18:02.040 --> 0:18:04.520
<v Speaker 3>it off the top of my head. And you guys

0:18:04.520 --> 0:18:06.919
<v Speaker 3>had like live texting, right and I was getting cooked

0:18:06.960 --> 0:18:09.160
<v Speaker 3>for that. They're like, what do you mean best case scenario?

0:18:09.359 --> 0:18:13.560
<v Speaker 3>Like we don't, We're aiming higher than that. Whatever, Like

0:18:13.640 --> 0:18:15.440
<v Speaker 3>you get this guy out of here. I'm like, oh man,

0:18:16.000 --> 0:18:19.920
<v Speaker 3>really like Godber's a sixty nine percent contact right.

0:18:20.600 --> 0:18:24.000
<v Speaker 1>That's pretty wow. So ten percent higher at.

0:18:23.800 --> 0:18:25.520
<v Speaker 4>The major league level. Wow.

0:18:25.960 --> 0:18:28.240
<v Speaker 3>And I don't mean to do this like last as time. Right,

0:18:28.320 --> 0:18:30.680
<v Speaker 3>he's twenty one years old. And I think there's tangible

0:18:30.680 --> 0:18:33.560
<v Speaker 3>things swing wise that he could fix, like to clean up.

0:18:33.600 --> 0:18:35.720
<v Speaker 3>Like when you look at the way that he moves,

0:18:35.720 --> 0:18:39.160
<v Speaker 3>he's super stacked on the backside, and then he really

0:18:39.240 --> 0:18:41.960
<v Speaker 3>tips that barrel over like it is pointing to almost

0:18:42.040 --> 0:18:45.840
<v Speaker 3>what looks like left center field, and then he's got

0:18:45.880 --> 0:18:48.120
<v Speaker 3>to bring the barrel all the way back. His hands

0:18:48.160 --> 0:18:50.520
<v Speaker 3>also get out far away from him all the way back,

0:18:50.560 --> 0:18:52.520
<v Speaker 3>and then it's got to flattened back out behind him

0:18:52.720 --> 0:18:54.640
<v Speaker 3>to get on plane. And I just think it has

0:18:54.640 --> 0:18:56.960
<v Speaker 3>to travel like especially just like the heart of the

0:18:57.000 --> 0:19:00.280
<v Speaker 3>barrel has to travel so far to make contact that

0:19:00.800 --> 0:19:04.600
<v Speaker 3>it's gonna give him a wider chance of being able

0:19:04.720 --> 0:19:07.120
<v Speaker 3>or a higher chance of swinging and missing. It's gonna

0:19:07.119 --> 0:19:08.840
<v Speaker 3>be harder to kind of meet the ball at the

0:19:08.880 --> 0:19:10.600
<v Speaker 3>same point every single time. It's gonna be harder to

0:19:10.640 --> 0:19:13.640
<v Speaker 3>have that same timing and to get on plane quickly

0:19:13.680 --> 0:19:15.200
<v Speaker 3>when you have veg up and in. I think that's

0:19:15.200 --> 0:19:17.040
<v Speaker 3>part of the reason why he struggling against lefties, because

0:19:17.040 --> 0:19:19.120
<v Speaker 3>the barrel gets so out far away from him, then

0:19:19.160 --> 0:19:20.480
<v Speaker 3>the front side kind of feels like, oh.

0:19:20.480 --> 0:19:22.080
<v Speaker 4>Wait, I got to get this barrel out of here.

0:19:22.160 --> 0:19:24.040
<v Speaker 3>So he kind of leaks open with the front side

0:19:24.080 --> 0:19:26.119
<v Speaker 3>and then that's how the barrel gets, you know, on plane,

0:19:26.200 --> 0:19:27.800
<v Speaker 3>is to just kind of create space and kind of

0:19:27.800 --> 0:19:29.240
<v Speaker 3>get it out. You see the front side of his

0:19:29.240 --> 0:19:30.960
<v Speaker 3>body kind of open up to get the barrel out.

0:19:31.160 --> 0:19:32.840
<v Speaker 3>And if you do that against lefties, you're gonna pull

0:19:32.840 --> 0:19:36.119
<v Speaker 3>off the stuff. He's so freakish with his bat speed

0:19:36.160 --> 0:19:38.520
<v Speaker 3>and his hands, he's able to make that work and

0:19:38.560 --> 0:19:41.119
<v Speaker 3>still hammer mistakes and hammer righty.

0:19:40.880 --> 0:19:43.359
<v Speaker 4>Stuff and all that good stuff. But I think when you.

0:19:43.240 --> 0:19:45.719
<v Speaker 3>Have pictures that are executing a little bit better and

0:19:45.760 --> 0:19:48.800
<v Speaker 3>you just got louder stuff, having to travel so far

0:19:48.880 --> 0:19:50.840
<v Speaker 3>with the barrel and having the mechanics that can kind

0:19:50.840 --> 0:19:53.520
<v Speaker 3>of get awry, I think can get exposed a little

0:19:53.520 --> 0:19:56.280
<v Speaker 3>bit more. And that's why I like think that this

0:19:56.359 --> 0:19:58.399
<v Speaker 3>part is what's been ignored a little bit with laz

0:19:58.520 --> 0:20:03.080
<v Speaker 3>is that two percent contact rate is is would be

0:20:03.119 --> 0:20:06.399
<v Speaker 3>hard to have success with at the highest level, and

0:20:06.440 --> 0:20:08.719
<v Speaker 3>he's doing it double because you can fall behind oh

0:20:08.720 --> 0:20:10.320
<v Speaker 3>two and then just get a cookie down the middle.

0:20:10.359 --> 0:20:12.760
<v Speaker 3>That's how it goes, and he doesn't miss those. But

0:20:13.119 --> 0:20:15.000
<v Speaker 3>when you're down oh two in the big weeks, you're

0:20:15.000 --> 0:20:16.520
<v Speaker 3>not gonna get that mistake to bail you out as

0:20:16.600 --> 0:20:17.720
<v Speaker 3>much you're gonna get put away.

0:20:18.760 --> 0:20:21.200
<v Speaker 2>So is a decent comp for him, Luke Raley. I

0:20:21.240 --> 0:20:23.399
<v Speaker 2>brought this up to you before we started recording, but

0:20:24.240 --> 0:20:27.879
<v Speaker 2>again you mentioned it. There is no prospect We've had

0:20:27.880 --> 0:20:30.320
<v Speaker 2>to feel more questions about than Las Montes because again

0:20:30.800 --> 0:20:34.399
<v Speaker 2>people people heard the Yordon comp five years ago and

0:20:34.440 --> 0:20:37.000
<v Speaker 2>really haven't let go to it, which I'd never thought

0:20:37.040 --> 0:20:39.080
<v Speaker 2>was a fair comp at all, because you're comparing him

0:20:39.119 --> 0:20:41.399
<v Speaker 2>to maybe the best hitter in Major League Baseball when

0:20:41.440 --> 0:20:44.280
<v Speaker 2>he doesn't have the approach that Jordon has. But if

0:20:44.320 --> 0:20:46.560
<v Speaker 2>he's Luke Rayley with a little bit more power where

0:20:46.560 --> 0:20:49.160
<v Speaker 2>he just crushes righties, he's not gonna play much against

0:20:49.240 --> 0:20:51.240
<v Speaker 2>lefties because, by the way, as you know, Arm his

0:20:51.320 --> 0:20:54.760
<v Speaker 2>platoon splits are really really rough. He's not gonna play

0:20:54.760 --> 0:20:56.880
<v Speaker 2>a ton of defense, but he can provide some pop

0:20:56.920 --> 0:20:58.960
<v Speaker 2>when there's a right handed arm on the mound. Like

0:20:59.119 --> 0:21:02.640
<v Speaker 2>is that a decent I think, like Luke Railey if

0:21:02.680 --> 0:21:08.200
<v Speaker 2>you're like a full power grade higher is not a

0:21:08.240 --> 0:21:08.840
<v Speaker 2>bad camp.

0:21:08.880 --> 0:21:10.720
<v Speaker 3>And I mean even look at like Luke Raley's max

0:21:10.760 --> 0:21:13.080
<v Speaker 3>ex velocity. I think of his career as one hundred

0:21:13.080 --> 0:21:15.560
<v Speaker 3>and fifteen point four miles per hour. Lass is at a

0:21:15.600 --> 0:21:17.840
<v Speaker 3>homer one eighteen this year, so like, you know, there's

0:21:17.880 --> 0:21:20.000
<v Speaker 3>more power in there. But in terms of like the

0:21:20.080 --> 0:21:23.360
<v Speaker 3>qualifying contact rate and kind of the type of hitter

0:21:23.440 --> 0:21:26.200
<v Speaker 3>you think he may be, yeah, he could look look

0:21:26.280 --> 0:21:28.720
<v Speaker 3>something like that. But the interesting part is, like Luke Railey,

0:21:29.119 --> 0:21:31.240
<v Speaker 3>he still hit twenty two homers in twenty twenty four.

0:21:31.359 --> 0:21:33.560
<v Speaker 3>I think the Las monss version of that season would

0:21:33.600 --> 0:21:36.359
<v Speaker 3>be thirty something homers. And if you do that, like

0:21:36.880 --> 0:21:38.840
<v Speaker 3>he's gonna have years where he's could be a three

0:21:38.920 --> 0:21:41.840
<v Speaker 3>win player and can be thirty forty percent above league

0:21:41.840 --> 0:21:45.000
<v Speaker 3>average offensively. The problem is there's also gonna be stretches

0:21:45.040 --> 0:21:49.359
<v Speaker 3>there where pictures are executing. I talk about it with

0:21:49.400 --> 0:21:51.639
<v Speaker 3>some of my buddies that are like playing and that

0:21:51.880 --> 0:21:53.720
<v Speaker 3>just have rough stretches that they don't think there's anything

0:21:53.720 --> 0:21:56.400
<v Speaker 3>wrong with them. It's just like I'm getting mlb'd right now,

0:21:56.400 --> 0:21:58.560
<v Speaker 3>where it's just you gotta tip the cap. There's nothing

0:21:58.560 --> 0:22:00.399
<v Speaker 3>you can do just like good morning, good afternoon, good night.

0:22:00.440 --> 0:22:02.320
<v Speaker 3>And I think with guys like last Monts like that's

0:22:02.359 --> 0:22:04.919
<v Speaker 3>gonna happen a little bit more frequently, because if you

0:22:04.960 --> 0:22:06.880
<v Speaker 3>execute your game plan against a guy with that much

0:22:06.880 --> 0:22:09.399
<v Speaker 3>with you can put him away fairly off. And the

0:22:09.400 --> 0:22:10.920
<v Speaker 3>thing is, I think he'll get himself to a point

0:22:10.920 --> 0:22:13.320
<v Speaker 3>where he's never missing the mistakes. In the big leagues,

0:22:13.960 --> 0:22:17.160
<v Speaker 3>he's he's hammering velocity, and anytime he's ahead, he's gonna

0:22:17.160 --> 0:22:18.240
<v Speaker 3>he's You're gonna be in trouble.

0:22:18.280 --> 0:22:20.440
<v Speaker 4>But I think it's gonna look something like that.

0:22:20.440 --> 0:22:23.560
<v Speaker 3>Which is like the thirty to thirty three percent strikeout

0:22:23.600 --> 0:22:27.200
<v Speaker 3>rate he homer is enough to you know, to keep

0:22:27.240 --> 0:22:31.719
<v Speaker 3>that offensive production above average. And then when he's hot,

0:22:31.800 --> 0:22:33.880
<v Speaker 3>you know, and and and he gets through a stretch

0:22:33.880 --> 0:22:35.520
<v Speaker 3>where he's seeing enough over the heart of the plate,

0:22:35.840 --> 0:22:37.680
<v Speaker 3>you know, he can give you some of the better

0:22:37.760 --> 0:22:38.840
<v Speaker 3>hot stretches.

0:22:38.400 --> 0:22:38.960
<v Speaker 4>That you'll get.

0:22:39.320 --> 0:22:43.159
<v Speaker 3>I think what helps Montes' cases, he's got time to

0:22:43.400 --> 0:22:45.200
<v Speaker 3>improve in that regard, and he could be a guy

0:22:45.200 --> 0:22:47.800
<v Speaker 3>that makes a mechanical adjustment. If he improves his contact

0:22:47.880 --> 0:22:50.600
<v Speaker 3>rate by five percent, you know, I think it makes

0:22:50.640 --> 0:22:51.400
<v Speaker 3>a huge difference.

0:22:52.320 --> 0:22:54.879
<v Speaker 1>I didn't even realize this until while you were talking

0:22:54.920 --> 0:22:57.679
<v Speaker 1>of looking this uPAR him. There's not a single player

0:22:57.720 --> 0:22:59.960
<v Speaker 1>in Major League Baseball currently at the at the top

0:23:00.080 --> 0:23:02.240
<v Speaker 1>level who has a sixty percent contact yes.

0:23:02.560 --> 0:23:03.880
<v Speaker 4>And I try to explain this.

0:23:03.880 --> 0:23:06.840
<v Speaker 3>To people with players like Wells, and I just feel

0:23:06.840 --> 0:23:08.840
<v Speaker 3>like I get yelled at and then they'll get all

0:23:08.920 --> 0:23:10.000
<v Speaker 3>these other counterpoints.

0:23:10.280 --> 0:23:12.680
<v Speaker 4>But that's the most important thing, Like what you have to.

0:23:12.640 --> 0:23:14.760
<v Speaker 3>Make contact, no matter how good your quality of contact is,

0:23:14.760 --> 0:23:16.719
<v Speaker 3>You've got to make contact. And I always look at

0:23:16.720 --> 0:23:18.960
<v Speaker 3>the big league qualifiers and I'm like, all right, well,

0:23:19.520 --> 0:23:21.480
<v Speaker 3>you know, who do you want to be? You know, like,

0:23:21.960 --> 0:23:24.000
<v Speaker 3>what's your best case scenario then? Or do you want

0:23:24.000 --> 0:23:25.280
<v Speaker 3>to be the new outlier? Do you want to be

0:23:25.320 --> 0:23:27.840
<v Speaker 3>the new guy that figured out how to produce making

0:23:27.840 --> 0:23:30.879
<v Speaker 3>contact half the time? I just don't good luck And

0:23:30.920 --> 0:23:34.000
<v Speaker 3>maybe somebody could do that, but I'm not gonna bet

0:23:34.040 --> 0:23:34.680
<v Speaker 3>on that guy.

0:23:35.320 --> 0:23:35.640
<v Speaker 4>You know.

0:23:35.920 --> 0:23:37.640
<v Speaker 3>I'm not gonna be like, hey, this is the guy

0:23:37.680 --> 0:23:39.359
<v Speaker 3>to be the new outlier. It's going to be tough.

0:23:40.000 --> 0:23:42.520
<v Speaker 3>So that's the problem with it is, Yeah, when you

0:23:42.560 --> 0:23:45.879
<v Speaker 3>start to look at contact rates across the game, not

0:23:46.040 --> 0:23:49.720
<v Speaker 3>a ton of guys are even qualifying South of sixty

0:23:49.760 --> 0:23:52.679
<v Speaker 3>and I think the closest the closest example would have

0:23:52.720 --> 0:23:56.000
<v Speaker 3>been Murakami, but we didn't even see Murakami have enough

0:23:56.000 --> 0:23:58.520
<v Speaker 3>time to like start to maybe struggle a little bit

0:23:58.600 --> 0:24:01.399
<v Speaker 3>or whatever it may have been. He's like sixty one percent.

0:24:01.600 --> 0:24:03.840
<v Speaker 3>But again, the other aspect of it is murk Kami's

0:24:03.840 --> 0:24:05.639
<v Speaker 3>one of the most patient hitters in Major League Baseball,

0:24:05.640 --> 0:24:07.440
<v Speaker 3>so that would probably be the path that Liz would

0:24:07.440 --> 0:24:08.000
<v Speaker 3>have to follow.

0:24:08.560 --> 0:24:11.840
<v Speaker 5>There is unfortunately some Joey Gallow in his game.

0:24:12.080 --> 0:24:15.200
<v Speaker 1>They're just yeah, like what I'm looking at here, guys,

0:24:15.400 --> 0:24:19.200
<v Speaker 1>is that like if if there's like a dream scenario here.

0:24:19.359 --> 0:24:22.280
<v Speaker 1>Nick Kurtz is in the bottom six in Major League

0:24:22.280 --> 0:24:25.520
<v Speaker 1>Baseball in contact percentage, but Laz from his current rate

0:24:25.560 --> 0:24:28.720
<v Speaker 1>would need to raise his contact percentage seven and a

0:24:28.720 --> 0:24:32.440
<v Speaker 1>half percent just to get to Kurtz. He's number six.

0:24:32.720 --> 0:24:34.560
<v Speaker 3>But that is kind of like the dream scenario because

0:24:34.560 --> 0:24:38.080
<v Speaker 3>you have this elite ability to just destroy the baseball.

0:24:38.400 --> 0:24:41.200
<v Speaker 4>He elevates the ball so consistently, and.

0:24:41.119 --> 0:24:43.239
<v Speaker 3>That's why, like Laz has the path, that's why he's

0:24:43.240 --> 0:24:45.639
<v Speaker 3>still a top one hundred prospects. Like he's got to

0:24:45.640 --> 0:24:47.040
<v Speaker 3>be the lowest contact rate of a guy I've ever

0:24:47.080 --> 0:24:50.080
<v Speaker 3>put on the top one hundred, but that's the avenue

0:24:50.080 --> 0:24:52.200
<v Speaker 3>and it's still got to be yeah, six to seven

0:24:52.240 --> 0:24:54.679
<v Speaker 3>percent better. And then you've got to have the you know,

0:24:54.720 --> 0:24:56.600
<v Speaker 3>the approach and the ability and the consistency I think

0:24:56.600 --> 0:24:59.560
<v Speaker 3>that Kurtz has. But that is like the dream and

0:24:59.600 --> 0:25:01.520
<v Speaker 3>that that that's the amazing part with Kurtz is he

0:25:01.640 --> 0:25:04.280
<v Speaker 3>is kind of the outlier to be as good as

0:25:04.280 --> 0:25:05.520
<v Speaker 3>he isn't as consistent as he is.

0:25:05.680 --> 0:25:08.320
<v Speaker 4>But to your point, it's got to increase by that much.

0:25:08.880 --> 0:25:12.480
<v Speaker 3>At the highest level, Kurtz was seventy five percent plus.

0:25:12.520 --> 0:25:13.760
<v Speaker 4>I think in the minor leagues.

0:25:14.920 --> 0:25:17.280
<v Speaker 1>Let's shift to Michael Royal here because he got promoted

0:25:17.320 --> 0:25:20.840
<v Speaker 1>alongside Las. It's clear he can hit, but where is

0:25:20.880 --> 0:25:24.000
<v Speaker 1>he going to play defense? They've split him pretty evenly

0:25:24.080 --> 0:25:27.520
<v Speaker 1>this year between second base and left field. Is there

0:25:27.600 --> 0:25:30.160
<v Speaker 1>any data to suggest he's better at one of these

0:25:30.200 --> 0:25:33.560
<v Speaker 1>positions after he's actually played these consistently in the regular season.

0:25:33.920 --> 0:25:36.440
<v Speaker 3>It's funny because I think he's come along pretty well

0:25:36.480 --> 0:25:40.160
<v Speaker 3>at second base, but then this year splitting the time

0:25:40.200 --> 0:25:42.040
<v Speaker 3>I think is affected as rhythm a little bit at

0:25:42.040 --> 0:25:42.520
<v Speaker 3>the position.

0:25:43.640 --> 0:25:44.520
<v Speaker 4>When I watch.

0:25:44.400 --> 0:25:47.639
<v Speaker 3>Him, I don't think he's bad in the outfield. I

0:25:47.680 --> 0:25:49.200
<v Speaker 3>think there's a world where he can be a fine

0:25:49.280 --> 0:25:52.160
<v Speaker 3>left fielder. And look, I think for a player like him,

0:25:52.200 --> 0:25:54.440
<v Speaker 3>where you're not going to get a ton of value

0:25:54.480 --> 0:25:57.520
<v Speaker 3>at any position, he plays, at least be versatile, and

0:25:57.560 --> 0:26:01.040
<v Speaker 3>I think that helps his case. But I felt like

0:26:01.080 --> 0:26:02.639
<v Speaker 3>you'd got to a point where he was playing second

0:26:02.640 --> 0:26:05.320
<v Speaker 3>every day. It looked like he'd found a rhythm where

0:26:06.000 --> 0:26:08.359
<v Speaker 3>he's very comfortable with the routine. He'd surprise you with

0:26:08.400 --> 0:26:10.840
<v Speaker 3>the range a little bit, the arm accuracy had improved.

0:26:11.200 --> 0:26:12.640
<v Speaker 3>But now that he's playing both, and I think it's

0:26:12.640 --> 0:26:13.879
<v Speaker 3>a good thing that he's playing both, but it just

0:26:13.920 --> 0:26:17.520
<v Speaker 3>has I think affected some of the consistency at second

0:26:17.560 --> 0:26:19.439
<v Speaker 3>base and has affected his ability to maybe even make

0:26:19.480 --> 0:26:20.159
<v Speaker 3>some of the routine.

0:26:21.119 --> 0:26:21.399
<v Speaker 5>That's it.

0:26:21.760 --> 0:26:25.280
<v Speaker 3>I think he's fringy at both, and I think that's

0:26:25.320 --> 0:26:26.920
<v Speaker 3>a good thing. I'd rather you'd be fringy at two

0:26:27.200 --> 0:26:29.800
<v Speaker 3>than one. And he's definitely not a disaster by any

0:26:29.800 --> 0:26:31.399
<v Speaker 3>means in left field, and it's coming. It seems like

0:26:31.440 --> 0:26:32.760
<v Speaker 3>he gets better each time you check in.

0:26:33.760 --> 0:26:36.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and just in terms of like Mariner's positional fits,

0:26:36.560 --> 0:26:39.200
<v Speaker 2>that feels like a potential a ros or rain of replacement,

0:26:39.200 --> 0:26:41.760
<v Speaker 2>because it's pretty likely Randy's going to sign elsewhere after

0:26:41.760 --> 0:26:44.719
<v Speaker 2>this season, and the Mariners don't have a ton of

0:26:44.720 --> 0:26:47.640
<v Speaker 2>open spots on their infield. But you know, you can

0:26:47.680 --> 0:26:50.240
<v Speaker 2>maneuver it next year, where Donovan's still playing a majority

0:26:50.320 --> 0:26:52.120
<v Speaker 2>of third base. He obviously have Cole Young and Colt

0:26:52.160 --> 0:26:54.719
<v Speaker 2>Emerson up the middle and Arroyo and left. I mean,

0:26:54.760 --> 0:26:56.399
<v Speaker 2>I think that would all work out positionally.

0:26:57.040 --> 0:26:59.000
<v Speaker 3>I think so, And you know, he's quick enough to

0:26:59.320 --> 0:27:02.600
<v Speaker 3>cover enough career. I think if he's really focusing just

0:27:02.680 --> 0:27:04.880
<v Speaker 3>on that position, I think a Royal will get more

0:27:04.880 --> 0:27:06.960
<v Speaker 3>and more comfortable out there and get to a point

0:27:06.960 --> 0:27:09.560
<v Speaker 3>where he can be fine. And yeah, I think left

0:27:09.600 --> 0:27:12.040
<v Speaker 3>is a little bit less demanding in general anyways.

0:27:12.080 --> 0:27:16.280
<v Speaker 4>But I think with a Royal in general, I don't

0:27:16.280 --> 0:27:16.800
<v Speaker 4>see why.

0:27:16.640 --> 0:27:20.240
<v Speaker 3>He couldn't be a forty five grade defender at left

0:27:20.240 --> 0:27:22.639
<v Speaker 3>field or forty grade at worst. And it was always

0:27:22.640 --> 0:27:25.200
<v Speaker 3>gonna be bat first with him anyways, so I think

0:27:25.200 --> 0:27:26.520
<v Speaker 3>he could be more than fine out there.

0:27:27.560 --> 0:27:29.879
<v Speaker 1>What's your evaluation of what we've seen from Colt at

0:27:29.920 --> 0:27:30.720
<v Speaker 1>the big league level.

0:27:31.280 --> 0:27:32.720
<v Speaker 4>You know, you always kind of figured it was gonna

0:27:32.720 --> 0:27:33.479
<v Speaker 4>be a bit of a process.

0:27:33.480 --> 0:27:35.520
<v Speaker 3>You also know that he's long been one of my

0:27:35.560 --> 0:27:38.600
<v Speaker 3>favorite prospects and guy that we had number two in

0:27:38.640 --> 0:27:40.920
<v Speaker 3>our latest update overall and had number three. I think

0:27:40.920 --> 0:27:43.840
<v Speaker 3>even before that the start of the season, I think

0:27:43.880 --> 0:27:45.200
<v Speaker 3>all things considered.

0:27:44.760 --> 0:27:47.800
<v Speaker 4>He's he's been solid. I think there's a little bit.

0:27:47.720 --> 0:27:49.600
<v Speaker 3>Of him now of late too, just being on the

0:27:49.640 --> 0:27:52.600
<v Speaker 3>defense and just try to trying not to.

0:27:52.040 --> 0:27:52.840
<v Speaker 4>Strike out so much.

0:27:52.880 --> 0:27:55.800
<v Speaker 3>Like it just seems like that's uncharacteristic territory for him.

0:27:56.320 --> 0:27:57.840
<v Speaker 3>You saw a little bit of it and trip away

0:27:57.880 --> 0:28:00.639
<v Speaker 3>though even too, which I think that Emerson situation, it

0:28:00.680 --> 0:28:02.280
<v Speaker 3>might be part of the reason why they want Las

0:28:02.359 --> 0:28:04.920
<v Speaker 3>up there too, is like even though this stuff might

0:28:04.960 --> 0:28:07.040
<v Speaker 3>be sharper and double these guys are so good at

0:28:07.080 --> 0:28:10.080
<v Speaker 3>executing and talking to players in their experience and making

0:28:10.119 --> 0:28:13.480
<v Speaker 3>the adjustment in the past. Is like these catchers, they'll

0:28:13.480 --> 0:28:15.720
<v Speaker 3>see one swing that you make and call the next

0:28:15.760 --> 0:28:17.879
<v Speaker 3>pitch accordingly, and that never really happens in double A

0:28:18.119 --> 0:28:19.800
<v Speaker 3>where they know they can kind of figure out how

0:28:19.800 --> 0:28:21.720
<v Speaker 3>to get you out. It's a lot of big league

0:28:21.840 --> 0:28:23.920
<v Speaker 3>former big league or guys that are up and down

0:28:23.960 --> 0:28:26.160
<v Speaker 3>type of catchers, and the game planning is just different

0:28:26.200 --> 0:28:29.080
<v Speaker 3>and all those different things, and you saw Emerson, who's

0:28:29.119 --> 0:28:31.160
<v Speaker 3>just been so good back to ball wise, even in TRIPA,

0:28:31.240 --> 0:28:34.600
<v Speaker 3>that strike out rate jump by ten percent. So I

0:28:34.640 --> 0:28:37.960
<v Speaker 3>think with him, it's just kind of getting used to

0:28:39.080 --> 0:28:40.840
<v Speaker 3>the idea that hey, I'm gonna whiffle a little bit

0:28:40.840 --> 0:28:42.560
<v Speaker 3>more than I'm used to, and I think he's going

0:28:42.600 --> 0:28:44.720
<v Speaker 3>to obviously chip away at that. But on the other

0:28:44.760 --> 0:28:47.800
<v Speaker 3>side of it, it's seven homers in forty one games

0:28:48.600 --> 0:28:51.280
<v Speaker 3>in a situation where I still think he's again battling

0:28:51.320 --> 0:28:52.520
<v Speaker 3>it on the defense a little bit.

0:28:53.320 --> 0:28:54.440
<v Speaker 4>I think is encouraging.

0:28:55.120 --> 0:28:57.360
<v Speaker 3>I think the underlying I think people look at the

0:28:57.360 --> 0:29:00.440
<v Speaker 3>savon page and say, oh no, But I don't worry

0:29:00.440 --> 0:29:02.480
<v Speaker 3>about that as much. For a twenty year old who's

0:29:02.480 --> 0:29:04.360
<v Speaker 3>getting his first taste of the big leagues and for

0:29:04.440 --> 0:29:07.680
<v Speaker 3>a team that's been trying to spark it offensively, team

0:29:07.680 --> 0:29:10.920
<v Speaker 3>that's really struggled from top to bottom against lefties anyways,

0:29:11.360 --> 0:29:13.000
<v Speaker 3>I think a lot of other rookies in his position

0:29:13.040 --> 0:29:15.440
<v Speaker 3>would be maybe insulated a little bit more, and he's

0:29:15.480 --> 0:29:16.960
<v Speaker 3>just kind of been thrown out there, which I think

0:29:17.040 --> 0:29:18.840
<v Speaker 3>is great because if the Mariners is going to reach

0:29:18.840 --> 0:29:21.000
<v Speaker 3>their ceiling, it's because coleld Emerson really finds his stride

0:29:21.000 --> 0:29:24.200
<v Speaker 3>in the second half, but I think overall it's been solid.

0:29:24.440 --> 0:29:27.120
<v Speaker 3>I think there's been some yellowish flags. I thought the

0:29:27.120 --> 0:29:29.400
<v Speaker 3>swing decisions would be a little bit better. But it's

0:29:29.400 --> 0:29:32.480
<v Speaker 3>important to remember that he's only played thirty or forty

0:29:32.480 --> 0:29:34.240
<v Speaker 3>four games above Double A.

0:29:34.840 --> 0:29:36.400
<v Speaker 4>And this is a player that also lost out.

0:29:36.320 --> 0:29:38.840
<v Speaker 3>On a lot of minor league games period through injuries

0:29:38.880 --> 0:29:42.200
<v Speaker 3>in the past, so he's still kind of developing at

0:29:42.200 --> 0:29:42.880
<v Speaker 3>the highest level.

0:29:42.920 --> 0:29:45.080
<v Speaker 4>He was just good enough for his last phase.

0:29:44.880 --> 0:29:47.120
<v Speaker 3>Of development to be still while he's trying to help

0:29:47.400 --> 0:29:48.760
<v Speaker 3>a win now big league team.

0:29:49.640 --> 0:29:51.480
<v Speaker 2>Let me ask you about one more prospect before we

0:29:51.520 --> 0:29:53.520
<v Speaker 2>get to a little bit of draft stuff, because it's

0:29:53.560 --> 0:29:56.560
<v Speaker 2>the prospect that currently sits at the highest spot on

0:29:56.600 --> 0:29:59.280
<v Speaker 2>your guys' list. And we talked about Kate Anderson for

0:29:59.280 --> 0:30:01.880
<v Speaker 2>the first few minutes this episode, and for every good reason,

0:30:01.880 --> 0:30:04.760
<v Speaker 2>because he's been phenomenal. You guys have him ranked to ten,

0:30:04.880 --> 0:30:07.920
<v Speaker 2>which is a stunt, like you're the ten rank prospect

0:30:07.920 --> 0:30:10.600
<v Speaker 2>in baseball. You're doing a lot of things really really well.

0:30:11.280 --> 0:30:13.280
<v Speaker 2>But you guys have Ryan Sloan at five, and I

0:30:13.280 --> 0:30:16.000
<v Speaker 2>feel like there's no point at this point where you

0:30:16.040 --> 0:30:18.160
<v Speaker 2>can talk about one arm in the Mariners system without

0:30:18.200 --> 0:30:18.480
<v Speaker 2>the other.

0:30:18.560 --> 0:30:22.120
<v Speaker 5>And we talked about Cade, but why do you love Sloan?

0:30:22.880 --> 0:30:27.200
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, And this is like the important note of you know,

0:30:27.240 --> 0:30:31.000
<v Speaker 3>we're ranking future big leaguers and not the not minor

0:30:31.080 --> 0:30:33.840
<v Speaker 3>leaguers right because if you're ranking minor leaguers right now,

0:30:33.840 --> 0:30:35.800
<v Speaker 3>of course Kate Anderson, it might be the best prospect

0:30:35.880 --> 0:30:39.160
<v Speaker 3>in baseball. But and I think Kate Anderson projects really,

0:30:39.200 --> 0:30:40.960
<v Speaker 3>really well, and you could see a guy that could

0:30:40.960 --> 0:30:43.920
<v Speaker 3>be could be a front line arm I think most

0:30:43.960 --> 0:30:47.000
<v Speaker 3>likely Lands is a really solid too. Ryan Sloan has

0:30:47.040 --> 0:30:51.160
<v Speaker 3>the stuff to be an ACE, and Ace is not

0:30:51.280 --> 0:30:54.360
<v Speaker 3>the best pitcher on a team aces And it's funny

0:30:54.360 --> 0:30:56.560
<v Speaker 3>talking about this with scouts is like, I think people

0:30:56.560 --> 0:30:57.640
<v Speaker 3>think there's thirty Aces.

0:30:57.680 --> 0:31:00.280
<v Speaker 4>There's like eight to ten at a given time.

0:31:00.280 --> 0:31:05.480
<v Speaker 3>If that that's generous in Major League baseball. Sloane has

0:31:05.520 --> 0:31:07.520
<v Speaker 3>that kind of stuff, and I think it's important to

0:31:07.920 --> 0:31:11.840
<v Speaker 3>note like he's just turned twenty years old, he's in

0:31:11.880 --> 0:31:14.640
<v Speaker 3>the same league that Yes, it's been amazing how Kate

0:31:14.680 --> 0:31:17.600
<v Speaker 3>Anderson's been able to limit damage, But Swoane, I think

0:31:17.600 --> 0:31:19.360
<v Speaker 3>people might look at the era and be like, oh,

0:31:19.480 --> 0:31:23.320
<v Speaker 3>it's inflated. The ball was flying ridiculously out there. He

0:31:23.360 --> 0:31:26.200
<v Speaker 3>had a couple I would just say it kind of

0:31:27.680 --> 0:31:32.040
<v Speaker 3>clunker starts, but otherwise the strikeout to walk rate this

0:31:32.160 --> 0:31:34.320
<v Speaker 3>kid is was nineteen years old at the start of

0:31:34.360 --> 0:31:38.400
<v Speaker 3>the season. He's seventy seven strikeouts to twelve walks at

0:31:38.520 --> 0:31:41.959
<v Speaker 3>double A. The thing that I get most excited about

0:31:42.240 --> 0:31:44.880
<v Speaker 3>is his fastball is averaging ninety six and a half

0:31:44.920 --> 0:31:48.800
<v Speaker 3>miles per hour and it's not even It might be

0:31:48.800 --> 0:31:51.000
<v Speaker 3>one of my least favorite aspects of his arsenal and

0:31:51.040 --> 0:31:54.400
<v Speaker 3>of his game. It's the whole pitch mix that stands

0:31:54.440 --> 0:31:55.840
<v Speaker 3>out to me. I think his sweeper is one of

0:31:55.880 --> 0:31:58.880
<v Speaker 3>the best in the minor leagues. The cutter is fantastic.

0:31:58.920 --> 0:32:00.800
<v Speaker 3>The fact that like he just picks up a baseball

0:32:01.040 --> 0:32:02.760
<v Speaker 3>in spring training and says, I'm gonna try to figure

0:32:02.800 --> 0:32:05.520
<v Speaker 3>out how to throw a sinker and adds that. And

0:32:05.560 --> 0:32:07.560
<v Speaker 3>that was the biggest thing, because I think the one

0:32:07.600 --> 0:32:11.080
<v Speaker 3>concern was, Okay, what's the face the fastball shape gonna

0:32:11.080 --> 0:32:14.160
<v Speaker 3>look like. The best way to insulate fastball shape is

0:32:14.480 --> 0:32:17.640
<v Speaker 3>one throw really hard to throw another fastball, and he's

0:32:17.640 --> 0:32:19.880
<v Speaker 3>doing both of those things. So when you have all

0:32:19.880 --> 0:32:21.800
<v Speaker 3>of those things coming together where you've got a clear

0:32:21.840 --> 0:32:25.040
<v Speaker 3>plus heater. You've got a seventy grade sweeper. This splitter

0:32:25.360 --> 0:32:27.600
<v Speaker 3>just continues to come along, and that's a plus pitch,

0:32:27.720 --> 0:32:30.600
<v Speaker 3>and then this bridge cutter in between, and then oh yeah,

0:32:30.600 --> 0:32:33.200
<v Speaker 3>by the way, this newly turned twenty year old six

0:32:33.280 --> 0:32:35.760
<v Speaker 3>foot five, two hundred and twenty pound, you know, just

0:32:36.080 --> 0:32:40.800
<v Speaker 3>stud commands his stuff outrageously well, like seventy percent strike

0:32:40.880 --> 0:32:44.040
<v Speaker 3>rate on fastballs, sixty eight percent strike rate on breaking balls,

0:32:44.200 --> 0:32:46.680
<v Speaker 3>and a sixty percent strike rate on the on the splitter,

0:32:46.880 --> 0:32:48.520
<v Speaker 3>and that could come along a little bit more, but

0:32:48.640 --> 0:32:51.440
<v Speaker 3>it's not bad at all for where he's at. We're

0:32:51.480 --> 0:32:54.160
<v Speaker 3>talking about a potential ace. If it all comes together.

0:32:54.400 --> 0:32:57.120
<v Speaker 2>That where would he I mean, that's so fun to

0:32:57.200 --> 0:32:59.320
<v Speaker 2>just hear and hear you break down because you're one

0:32:59.360 --> 0:33:01.960
<v Speaker 2>hundred percent right about there's a different There's not thirty

0:33:02.000 --> 0:33:04.400
<v Speaker 2>aces in baseball. Every team can have a number one,

0:33:04.800 --> 0:33:07.760
<v Speaker 2>but you're one hundred percent right the aces in baseball.

0:33:08.000 --> 0:33:10.080
<v Speaker 2>You're right, there's there's less than ten. And it's the

0:33:10.160 --> 0:33:14.120
<v Speaker 2>names everybody knows Scoobale, Skimes, Sanchez, Yamamoto like that group.

0:33:14.400 --> 0:33:16.080
<v Speaker 2>So to hear you say he could one day be

0:33:16.160 --> 0:33:19.800
<v Speaker 2>in that rank of guys is Marrion's van should be

0:33:19.840 --> 0:33:20.400
<v Speaker 2>pretty excited.

0:33:21.320 --> 0:33:23.160
<v Speaker 3>I'm glad I could say that after like just the

0:33:23.200 --> 0:33:26.360
<v Speaker 3>whole lass uh uh rain on the parade there, but no,

0:33:26.440 --> 0:33:28.800
<v Speaker 3>they should be. And you also put it like you

0:33:28.840 --> 0:33:31.440
<v Speaker 3>put him in an organization that like it's like the logan.

0:33:32.640 --> 0:33:34.200
<v Speaker 4>You look at the logan Gilbert.

0:33:33.840 --> 0:33:37.520
<v Speaker 3>Template and you build with Sloan and you have your

0:33:37.560 --> 0:33:39.960
<v Speaker 3>hands on swe earlier. You have some one that's ahead

0:33:39.960 --> 0:33:42.320
<v Speaker 3>of where Gilbert was at at that age. But you

0:33:42.400 --> 0:33:46.840
<v Speaker 3>have the success I think with so many different talented,

0:33:46.840 --> 0:33:49.760
<v Speaker 3>talented right handers. And doesn't mean that it's going to

0:33:50.120 --> 0:33:52.360
<v Speaker 3>end up the same way, But I would love to

0:33:52.520 --> 0:33:55.760
<v Speaker 3>just get Mariners people on record that have been there

0:33:55.800 --> 0:33:57.800
<v Speaker 3>long enough to see, like all of these guys and say,

0:33:58.960 --> 0:34:01.800
<v Speaker 3>how does Sloan compare to talent wise to all of

0:34:01.800 --> 0:34:04.840
<v Speaker 3>them at the age that you brought them into the organization.

0:34:04.920 --> 0:34:08.680
<v Speaker 3>And my guess would be that they'd say Slowness is

0:34:08.800 --> 0:34:10.920
<v Speaker 3>as talented, if not the most talented, of any of them.

0:34:11.840 --> 0:34:14.520
<v Speaker 1>Where do how does he look different in a bullpen?

0:34:14.719 --> 0:34:17.399
<v Speaker 1>You think, because it sounds like the Murders will bring

0:34:17.440 --> 0:34:20.600
<v Speaker 1>him up in I would guess September and put him

0:34:20.600 --> 0:34:21.719
<v Speaker 1>in that bullpen for the past.

0:34:23.120 --> 0:34:25.440
<v Speaker 2>So that's the reporting out there and we'll see if

0:34:25.480 --> 0:34:28.080
<v Speaker 2>it happens. But they think in September Caid and Sloan

0:34:28.440 --> 0:34:30.080
<v Speaker 2>are both going to be in the pen for if

0:34:30.080 --> 0:34:32.600
<v Speaker 2>this team makes the playoffs. Their ideas like, just get

0:34:32.640 --> 0:34:35.080
<v Speaker 2>your best thirteen arms in the organization on the roster

0:34:35.239 --> 0:34:36.280
<v Speaker 2>and see what happens.

0:34:36.520 --> 0:34:40.279
<v Speaker 3>I love it because also like two elite makeup guys too,

0:34:40.320 --> 0:34:43.640
<v Speaker 3>that the experience would be so invaluable for them, and

0:34:43.760 --> 0:34:45.960
<v Speaker 3>having another left team the fold in general with with

0:34:45.960 --> 0:34:48.560
<v Speaker 3>with Kid would be great. Like I said, I think

0:34:48.560 --> 0:34:50.400
<v Speaker 3>the one area is like maybe the fastball could get

0:34:50.480 --> 0:34:52.279
<v Speaker 3>hit a little bit just because of the shape if

0:34:52.320 --> 0:34:55.160
<v Speaker 3>he's if he's not executing it as well as he

0:34:55.239 --> 0:34:57.440
<v Speaker 3>possibly can. But then you've got the two different fastballs,

0:34:57.680 --> 0:35:00.000
<v Speaker 3>and then him in short spurts s everaging ninety six,

0:35:00.320 --> 0:35:04.000
<v Speaker 3>he's touching ninety nine plus on the fastball affording with

0:35:04.000 --> 0:35:06.480
<v Speaker 3>triple digits. If he's in a one to two inning

0:35:06.520 --> 0:35:09.879
<v Speaker 3>spurt with adrenaline, he's probably gonna be sitting ninety eight

0:35:09.960 --> 0:35:13.680
<v Speaker 3>ninety nine exceeding triple digits. And if you're doing that

0:35:13.760 --> 0:35:17.080
<v Speaker 3>fastball shape matters a lot lot less and he has

0:35:17.120 --> 0:35:20.680
<v Speaker 3>touched one hundred this year, So like, I think that

0:35:20.880 --> 0:35:25.279
<v Speaker 3>fastball sweeper combination alone in right on right matchups would

0:35:25.280 --> 0:35:28.239
<v Speaker 3>be a nightmare for hitters. And then the fact that

0:35:28.280 --> 0:35:30.880
<v Speaker 3>he's got the cutter and the splitter too is great.

0:35:31.040 --> 0:35:32.839
<v Speaker 4>But I think if you're putting him in a position.

0:35:32.560 --> 0:35:35.239
<v Speaker 3>For success, like he could be at low leverage right

0:35:35.280 --> 0:35:37.759
<v Speaker 3>on right situations and just be way too good for

0:35:37.840 --> 0:35:40.560
<v Speaker 3>that spot. So like the field, because the feel for

0:35:40.600 --> 0:35:43.160
<v Speaker 3>the splitter is still coming along, he doesn't even need it.

0:35:43.440 --> 0:35:46.080
<v Speaker 3>You go right on right with that seventy grade sweeper

0:35:46.120 --> 0:35:49.000
<v Speaker 3>and a fastball at ninety eight and two different fastballs,

0:35:49.960 --> 0:35:51.680
<v Speaker 3>I think he's gonna be pretty good in a bullpen.

0:35:53.440 --> 0:35:56.160
<v Speaker 1>Let us tell you guys about Cozy Earth. Cozy Earth's

0:35:56.160 --> 0:35:58.520
<v Speaker 1>mission is to make home the best part of your life.

0:35:58.600 --> 0:36:01.360
<v Speaker 1>They send us their bamboo she set. They're everywhere pant

0:36:01.600 --> 0:36:04.520
<v Speaker 1>and every day polo for us to try, and we

0:36:04.520 --> 0:36:07.520
<v Speaker 1>were really impressed. The bamboo sheet set lives up to

0:36:07.560 --> 0:36:10.240
<v Speaker 1>the hype. It's Cozy Earth's mission to make the softest

0:36:10.280 --> 0:36:12.160
<v Speaker 1>sheets in the world, and I think they've gotten pretty

0:36:12.200 --> 0:36:14.520
<v Speaker 1>darn close. And I really like the pant and polo

0:36:14.560 --> 0:36:16.880
<v Speaker 1>as well. For what I look for in everyday clothes.

0:36:17.000 --> 0:36:20.399
<v Speaker 1>I'm looking for something comfortable but a little stylish as well,

0:36:20.440 --> 0:36:22.920
<v Speaker 1>and I think both of these check those boxes. Just

0:36:22.920 --> 0:36:25.160
<v Speaker 1>so you know, Cozy Earth has a lifetime warranty on

0:36:25.200 --> 0:36:28.280
<v Speaker 1>their clothes, a hassle free return process, and one hundred

0:36:28.360 --> 0:36:31.320
<v Speaker 1>nights sleep trial on their sheets. Summer should feel easy

0:36:31.400 --> 0:36:34.560
<v Speaker 1>for everyone in the house. Cozy Earth's bamboo sheet set,

0:36:34.640 --> 0:36:37.279
<v Speaker 1>Everywhere pant and every Day Polo are meant to keep

0:36:37.320 --> 0:36:41.000
<v Speaker 1>you cool, comfortable, and actually relaxed all summer long. Head

0:36:41.000 --> 0:36:43.520
<v Speaker 1>to cozyearth dot com and use our code marine for

0:36:43.560 --> 0:36:48.840
<v Speaker 1>an exclusive twenty percent off. That's code Marine maarn for

0:36:48.920 --> 0:36:51.360
<v Speaker 1>an exclusive twenty percent off. And if you see a

0:36:51.400 --> 0:36:54.319
<v Speaker 1>post purchase survey mention that you heard about Cozy Earth

0:36:54.520 --> 0:36:57.040
<v Speaker 1>right here. Starting a business is a big deal and

0:36:57.080 --> 0:36:59.600
<v Speaker 1>it can be very intimidating. There's a ton of questions

0:36:59.640 --> 0:37:02.400
<v Speaker 1>with not always a ton of answers. You'd be surprised

0:37:02.440 --> 0:37:05.000
<v Speaker 1>how much simpler Shopify makes it packed with all the

0:37:05.040 --> 0:37:08.319
<v Speaker 1>tools you need included from day one. Shopify's templates and

0:37:08.360 --> 0:37:10.840
<v Speaker 1>AI tools get you a stunning site up and running

0:37:10.880 --> 0:37:14.480
<v Speaker 1>fast with no coding needed. It also seamlessly integrates into

0:37:14.520 --> 0:37:17.480
<v Speaker 1>an existing website like it did with ours. Shopify checkout

0:37:17.520 --> 0:37:20.920
<v Speaker 1>means more customers can actually buy, and returning ones can

0:37:20.960 --> 0:37:23.400
<v Speaker 1>do so with a single click. We saw the effectiveness

0:37:23.440 --> 0:37:25.920
<v Speaker 1>of this right away with the volume of merch sales

0:37:25.960 --> 0:37:28.319
<v Speaker 1>as soon as we went live. If questions come up,

0:37:28.360 --> 0:37:31.640
<v Speaker 1>Shopify's built in AI assistance Sidekick is ready to help

0:37:31.680 --> 0:37:35.160
<v Speaker 1>you build, troubleshoot, and keep moving. Because Shopify handles the

0:37:35.200 --> 0:37:37.840
<v Speaker 1>setup and check out, you have more time to focus

0:37:37.920 --> 0:37:40.600
<v Speaker 1>on growing your business, which was my main concern when

0:37:40.640 --> 0:37:43.560
<v Speaker 1>setting up our own merchandise. All you need is an idea.

0:37:43.760 --> 0:37:46.879
<v Speaker 1>Shopify handles the rest. Start your free trial today at

0:37:46.880 --> 0:37:50.799
<v Speaker 1>shopify dot com slash marine Layer. Again that shopify dot

0:37:50.840 --> 0:37:53.920
<v Speaker 1>com slash marine Layer. To start your free trial today

0:37:54.040 --> 0:37:59.799
<v Speaker 1>shopify dot com slash marine Layer. Before we get to

0:38:00.080 --> 0:38:02.640
<v Speaker 1>these draft prospects that the mariners might pick here in

0:38:02.680 --> 0:38:05.120
<v Speaker 1>a week from now or less than a week from now. Actually,

0:38:06.520 --> 0:38:09.680
<v Speaker 1>who is someone we haven't talked about yet that you

0:38:09.719 --> 0:38:11.680
<v Speaker 1>think Mariners finn should look out for here in the

0:38:11.719 --> 0:38:12.320
<v Speaker 1>second half.

0:38:12.760 --> 0:38:14.440
<v Speaker 4>Ooh, that's a good question.

0:38:17.080 --> 0:38:20.200
<v Speaker 3>It's funny because Arroyo would have been my pick just

0:38:20.239 --> 0:38:22.400
<v Speaker 3>because of the way that he's swinging it of late?

0:38:24.280 --> 0:38:26.040
<v Speaker 3>Can I can you come back to me on that one.

0:38:26.320 --> 0:38:27.360
<v Speaker 4>I want to give you. I want to give you

0:38:27.400 --> 0:38:30.560
<v Speaker 4>a proper answer. Sure, let's okay the.

0:38:30.520 --> 0:38:31.880
<v Speaker 5>End of the show, we can come back to it.

0:38:31.960 --> 0:38:33.799
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I'll give you a good answer on that one

0:38:33.840 --> 0:38:34.440
<v Speaker 4>on the back end.

0:38:35.120 --> 0:38:38.080
<v Speaker 2>So with that, let's transition a little bit to the draft,

0:38:38.080 --> 0:38:40.520
<v Speaker 2>because it's like TJ said, we are days away from

0:38:40.600 --> 0:38:44.040
<v Speaker 2>the MLB Draft. Every draft seems to have its own

0:38:44.120 --> 0:38:46.120
<v Speaker 2>theme or its own kind of makeup.

0:38:46.280 --> 0:38:47.600
<v Speaker 5>Does this draft have a theme to you?

0:38:49.520 --> 0:38:52.440
<v Speaker 3>This one is interesting because you know, twenty four was

0:38:52.600 --> 0:38:55.840
<v Speaker 3>very college heavy. I think twenty five felt like it

0:38:55.880 --> 0:38:58.120
<v Speaker 3>was a little bit more high school heavy.

0:38:58.200 --> 0:39:00.480
<v Speaker 4>This one, I just think is top heavy. And I

0:39:00.480 --> 0:39:00.920
<v Speaker 4>don't mean that.

0:39:00.920 --> 0:39:03.480
<v Speaker 3>To say like the Mariners won't get somebody really good.

0:39:03.480 --> 0:39:05.879
<v Speaker 3>And we already saw this in the twenty five dropt.

0:39:05.880 --> 0:39:07.719
<v Speaker 3>There's been like second third rounders that have just been

0:39:07.760 --> 0:39:10.520
<v Speaker 3>going off that all of a sudden are top one

0:39:10.560 --> 0:39:13.040
<v Speaker 3>hundred prospects. It just feels like for me, there's a

0:39:13.040 --> 0:39:19.239
<v Speaker 3>clear like Tier one one A and it's Chilawski, you know,

0:39:19.280 --> 0:39:20.440
<v Speaker 3>And you can say this in a lot of years,

0:39:20.480 --> 0:39:22.360
<v Speaker 3>but I just I feel like this year especially, it

0:39:22.440 --> 0:39:25.759
<v Speaker 3>just kind of jumps down a little bit, at least

0:39:25.800 --> 0:39:28.960
<v Speaker 3>just for the obvious before these guys played professionally. When

0:39:29.000 --> 0:39:33.080
<v Speaker 3>you look at chowlawski Emerson and Lackey especially, like those

0:39:33.080 --> 0:39:34.920
<v Speaker 3>guys just kind of feel like they're in their own

0:39:35.080 --> 0:39:37.960
<v Speaker 3>element and even you could maybe throw Buris is like

0:39:38.000 --> 0:39:40.360
<v Speaker 3>the one buffer guy between that. But then when you

0:39:40.400 --> 0:39:42.640
<v Speaker 3>go to the next tier of like those bats, I

0:39:42.719 --> 0:39:45.680
<v Speaker 3>just think it kind of drops, which doesn't affect the

0:39:45.680 --> 0:39:47.600
<v Speaker 3>Mariners at all. I'd be kind of worried about it

0:39:47.600 --> 0:39:50.080
<v Speaker 3>if I picked at like nine, because I'm like, I'm

0:39:50.120 --> 0:39:52.759
<v Speaker 3>in this a little bit of an in between phase. Again,

0:39:52.880 --> 0:39:55.840
<v Speaker 3>things always change, but as of right now, that's the

0:39:55.880 --> 0:39:58.000
<v Speaker 3>one theme for me is just and then the other

0:39:58.120 --> 0:39:58.479
<v Speaker 3>is just.

0:39:58.560 --> 0:40:01.120
<v Speaker 4>I feel like it's it's a heavy at the top.

0:40:01.719 --> 0:40:03.560
<v Speaker 3>There's a lot of arms in the Mariners range, and

0:40:03.600 --> 0:40:05.400
<v Speaker 3>I think that's why they're kind of tied towards a

0:40:05.400 --> 0:40:06.320
<v Speaker 3>lot more of those arms.

0:40:07.000 --> 0:40:10.360
<v Speaker 4>But for me, I think that's that's kind of the case.

0:40:11.320 --> 0:40:13.280
<v Speaker 1>Are the Mariners going to get back to their roots

0:40:13.320 --> 0:40:15.560
<v Speaker 1>in this draft and go back on a run of

0:40:15.640 --> 0:40:16.680
<v Speaker 1>drafting college pitchers?

0:40:17.760 --> 0:40:19.440
<v Speaker 3>This would be kind of the draft to do that.

0:40:19.600 --> 0:40:22.640
<v Speaker 3>I think it depends on how things shake out, you know,

0:40:22.800 --> 0:40:24.680
<v Speaker 3>like who they got on their big board and whatever

0:40:24.719 --> 0:40:28.640
<v Speaker 3>it may be. However, with the way that you assume,

0:40:28.680 --> 0:40:30.759
<v Speaker 3>and it doesn't always go that way, but the way

0:40:30.800 --> 0:40:33.600
<v Speaker 3>that you would assume, the draft would kind of unfold.

0:40:35.200 --> 0:40:36.959
<v Speaker 3>It seems like a lot of the guys that would

0:40:36.960 --> 0:40:40.760
<v Speaker 3>be on their perceived big board would that would be available,

0:40:40.800 --> 0:40:43.960
<v Speaker 3>there would be arms, and so I could see it

0:40:44.000 --> 0:40:44.640
<v Speaker 3>going that way.

0:40:44.880 --> 0:40:47.120
<v Speaker 4>That said, like we're going to talk about some individual players.

0:40:47.400 --> 0:40:50.080
<v Speaker 3>I think there's a couple of bats, one in particular

0:40:50.120 --> 0:40:52.279
<v Speaker 3>that if he's there, and maybe I'm wrong, I just

0:40:52.360 --> 0:40:55.399
<v Speaker 3>I really like this guy and Bo Lawrence I think

0:40:55.440 --> 0:40:58.160
<v Speaker 3>he could go earlier than that, and I based on

0:40:58.200 --> 0:41:00.359
<v Speaker 3>what the Mariners have done in the past, I think

0:41:00.400 --> 0:41:02.719
<v Speaker 3>would be a guy that they would really like and

0:41:02.840 --> 0:41:04.600
<v Speaker 3>just just kind of fits the bill of they have

0:41:04.719 --> 0:41:08.640
<v Speaker 3>such a good eye for just these these advanced high

0:41:08.640 --> 0:41:11.360
<v Speaker 3>school hitters with the makeup that is just going to

0:41:11.440 --> 0:41:13.439
<v Speaker 3>work really well, and like they draft people so well.

0:41:14.520 --> 0:41:16.360
<v Speaker 3>I love Bo Lawrence and I think he could be

0:41:16.400 --> 0:41:17.799
<v Speaker 3>a good fit for them. But when you look at

0:41:17.840 --> 0:41:20.479
<v Speaker 3>the way that you anticipate the draft to run off,

0:41:20.880 --> 0:41:23.279
<v Speaker 3>it seems like a college arm kind of fits the

0:41:23.280 --> 0:41:23.879
<v Speaker 3>bill for them.

0:41:24.560 --> 0:41:26.960
<v Speaker 1>Let me know if organizations think this way, because like

0:41:27.000 --> 0:41:30.040
<v Speaker 1>if you're the Mariners, this this group of people running

0:41:30.040 --> 0:41:32.160
<v Speaker 1>the org have been there now for a whole decade,

0:41:32.560 --> 0:41:34.560
<v Speaker 1>and they have a decade's worth of data that every

0:41:34.640 --> 0:41:37.160
<v Speaker 1>time they pick a college starting pitcher in the first round,

0:41:37.480 --> 0:41:40.200
<v Speaker 1>the worst case outcome is the guy who threw seven

0:41:40.239 --> 0:41:43.160
<v Speaker 1>shoutout innings on Sunday in Emerson Hancock. Like that's literally

0:41:43.239 --> 0:41:45.880
<v Speaker 1>out of the college pitchers, that's the worst one they drafted.

0:41:46.160 --> 0:41:49.239
<v Speaker 1>Or so I guess you what, Roldan, why would you

0:41:49.280 --> 0:41:51.879
<v Speaker 1>do anything else when you have like examples of these

0:41:51.960 --> 0:41:55.320
<v Speaker 1>high school hitters you've picked, where you have one super

0:41:55.360 --> 0:41:58.640
<v Speaker 1>blue chip prospect in Colt Emerson, but then you have

0:41:58.719 --> 0:42:00.400
<v Speaker 1>a lot more volatility after that.

0:42:00.960 --> 0:42:02.799
<v Speaker 2>I was gonna just say really quick, like, I guess

0:42:02.840 --> 0:42:04.879
<v Speaker 2>you could throw Jorangelo into that bunch, but if he's

0:42:04.880 --> 0:42:06.680
<v Speaker 2>the worst one, you got Brandon Donovan out of him.

0:42:06.880 --> 0:42:08.880
<v Speaker 3>But that's going to say you knew, you you he

0:42:08.960 --> 0:42:10.919
<v Speaker 3>still had a ton of value and you maybe knew

0:42:10.920 --> 0:42:13.200
<v Speaker 3>the writing was on the wall that wasn't as good

0:42:13.200 --> 0:42:17.719
<v Speaker 3>as you'd hoped, and you capitalize, right, It's funny because

0:42:17.719 --> 0:42:22.040
<v Speaker 3>I think that one hundred teams are cognizant of like

0:42:22.080 --> 0:42:25.960
<v Speaker 3>what they're good at, and I think a big part

0:42:26.000 --> 0:42:28.600
<v Speaker 3>of that has to be, like, hey, we we develop

0:42:28.840 --> 0:42:31.279
<v Speaker 3>these types of players quite well, and we do well there.

0:42:31.320 --> 0:42:34.040
<v Speaker 3>But at the same time, you don't want to shoehorn

0:42:34.120 --> 0:42:38.400
<v Speaker 3>a pick to fit your your tendencies if the draft

0:42:38.440 --> 0:42:40.520
<v Speaker 3>doesn't call for it, right, And I think that's where

0:42:40.520 --> 0:42:42.959
<v Speaker 3>it's there's a balance. I think if you've got two

0:42:43.040 --> 0:42:47.239
<v Speaker 3>exactly similar players in their big board, it's twenty one

0:42:47.320 --> 0:42:50.279
<v Speaker 3>and twenty two, and one fits kind of what they've

0:42:50.280 --> 0:42:52.000
<v Speaker 3>had a lot more success with, I think that's something

0:42:52.040 --> 0:42:54.160
<v Speaker 3>they consider. But you could also argue that the Mariner's

0:42:54.160 --> 0:42:57.040
<v Speaker 3>about a lot of success with you know, high school bets,

0:42:57.040 --> 0:42:58.680
<v Speaker 3>and they've had a lot of success in a lot

0:42:58.680 --> 0:43:00.960
<v Speaker 3>of other ways. And actually, like in the time that

0:43:01.000 --> 0:43:02.600
<v Speaker 3>we've had now, I could give you a couple of

0:43:02.840 --> 0:43:04.080
<v Speaker 3>the answers of guys that I think are going to

0:43:04.120 --> 0:43:06.800
<v Speaker 3>ball out in the second half. Both are high school bats,

0:43:06.800 --> 0:43:10.080
<v Speaker 3>by the way, But I think I think it's something

0:43:10.120 --> 0:43:14.920
<v Speaker 3>they consider. But ultimately, I really do believe, especially in

0:43:15.160 --> 0:43:17.920
<v Speaker 3>MLB draft, aside from the variable of like negotiating the

0:43:17.960 --> 0:43:19.880
<v Speaker 3>deals because it is kind of open season more than

0:43:19.880 --> 0:43:22.359
<v Speaker 3>people like to think in terms of just like negotiating

0:43:22.440 --> 0:43:23.880
<v Speaker 3>it and that being a big.

0:43:23.760 --> 0:43:24.520
<v Speaker 4>Part of it.

0:43:24.520 --> 0:43:26.400
<v Speaker 3>It's the best player available that they can work a

0:43:26.440 --> 0:43:30.040
<v Speaker 3>deal with, and if that doesn't work out, then yeah,

0:43:30.040 --> 0:43:32.879
<v Speaker 3>maybe they go back to what they're comfortable with.

0:43:33.600 --> 0:43:36.240
<v Speaker 1>When do these agreements take place? Like, are there agreements

0:43:36.239 --> 0:43:37.080
<v Speaker 1>in place right now?

0:43:38.080 --> 0:43:40.200
<v Speaker 3>I think there's a lot of tentative agreements in place

0:43:40.280 --> 0:43:43.759
<v Speaker 3>right now. Yeah, and a lot of back and forth

0:43:43.800 --> 0:43:46.080
<v Speaker 3>and a lot of things change, especially as it gets closer.

0:43:46.160 --> 0:43:49.760
<v Speaker 3>But a lot of phone calls, a lot of busy agents,

0:43:49.760 --> 0:43:53.319
<v Speaker 3>a lot of conversations. If this goes like this, then

0:43:53.480 --> 0:43:56.760
<v Speaker 3>you know, we'll agree to this and all of that stuff.

0:43:56.800 --> 0:43:58.480
<v Speaker 3>But I will also say it goes the other way

0:43:58.480 --> 0:44:00.360
<v Speaker 3>off and a lot I hear all the time players

0:44:00.400 --> 0:44:00.920
<v Speaker 3>being drafted.

0:44:01.480 --> 0:44:02.959
<v Speaker 4>I had no communication with the team.

0:44:03.320 --> 0:44:07.320
<v Speaker 3>We just And that's one where it's maybe the team

0:44:07.680 --> 0:44:10.600
<v Speaker 3>had two or three guys that they had some arrangements

0:44:10.640 --> 0:44:13.399
<v Speaker 3>made with they came off the board, or they they

0:44:13.960 --> 0:44:16.440
<v Speaker 3>as a pick got closer, changed their mind, somebody else

0:44:16.480 --> 0:44:17.960
<v Speaker 3>came in with a better off, whatever it may be.

0:44:18.000 --> 0:44:21.040
<v Speaker 3>Bottom down, a team behind the Mariners offered a couple

0:44:21.160 --> 0:44:24.040
<v Speaker 3>hundred thousand dollars more who knows, and they got a

0:44:24.080 --> 0:44:25.600
<v Speaker 3>panic and go make another pick, and they'll just go

0:44:25.640 --> 0:44:26.960
<v Speaker 3>off the big board and say, we haven't really talked

0:44:27.000 --> 0:44:28.880
<v Speaker 3>to this guy yet, like let's take him and we'll

0:44:28.880 --> 0:44:29.480
<v Speaker 3>figure it out.

0:44:30.239 --> 0:44:31.680
<v Speaker 4>And it kind of.

0:44:31.680 --> 0:44:33.600
<v Speaker 3>Goes all ways, which is why the MLB draft is

0:44:33.640 --> 0:44:35.920
<v Speaker 3>just so nuts.

0:44:35.040 --> 0:44:37.520
<v Speaker 2>So different than the NFL draft and the NBA draft

0:44:37.560 --> 0:44:40.279
<v Speaker 2>in that way, because you know, there's not negotiating like

0:44:40.320 --> 0:44:42.200
<v Speaker 2>that in those drafts for the most part, or in

0:44:42.239 --> 0:44:45.320
<v Speaker 2>baseball it's so different. Let me let me throw a

0:44:45.320 --> 0:44:47.879
<v Speaker 2>couple of names at you, because at least in mock

0:44:47.960 --> 0:44:50.279
<v Speaker 2>drafts and and what you guys have talked about at

0:44:50.280 --> 0:44:54.279
<v Speaker 2>points two. If the Mariners draft the college arm, something

0:44:54.320 --> 0:44:57.239
<v Speaker 2>they've done a lot, the guys that seem to be

0:44:57.280 --> 0:44:59.799
<v Speaker 2>in that mix are as follows. Because there's a couple

0:44:59.840 --> 0:45:03.120
<v Speaker 2>name You've seen Kyd Townsend from Old miss. You've seen

0:45:03.480 --> 0:45:07.880
<v Speaker 2>Cole Carlon from ASU. There's Tegankuns from Tennessee. There's Mason

0:45:08.000 --> 0:45:10.440
<v Speaker 2>Edwards from USC. There's probably a couple of it I'm missing,

0:45:10.560 --> 0:45:13.920
<v Speaker 2>but there's a handful of college arms projected around that range.

0:45:14.160 --> 0:45:16.080
<v Speaker 2>Is there one guy you like better than the rest

0:45:16.080 --> 0:45:16.600
<v Speaker 2>of that bunch.

0:45:17.360 --> 0:45:19.680
<v Speaker 3>I like Townsend the most, I think, and I like

0:45:19.760 --> 0:45:22.480
<v Speaker 3>him as a good fit for this or too. The

0:45:22.520 --> 0:45:24.959
<v Speaker 3>fact it's funny because it's such a deep mix and

0:45:25.120 --> 0:45:28.200
<v Speaker 3>you'll get swowns. It's similar in the regard that, like,

0:45:29.400 --> 0:45:32.919
<v Speaker 3>if there's one knock, it's probably that the fastball performance.

0:45:32.960 --> 0:45:35.520
<v Speaker 3>And now Swan's fastball is performing really well because he

0:45:35.680 --> 0:45:37.960
<v Speaker 3>throws so hard at the level and the two fastballs,

0:45:37.960 --> 0:45:40.640
<v Speaker 3>but like Townshend's fastball, you'll get the specs. I would

0:45:40.640 --> 0:45:42.040
<v Speaker 3>have thought it would perform a little bit better.

0:45:42.080 --> 0:45:42.520
<v Speaker 4>It didn't.

0:45:42.560 --> 0:45:45.920
<v Speaker 3>That was like his one achilles heel, I guess. But

0:45:45.960 --> 0:45:50.920
<v Speaker 3>there's so many secondaries and such a sharp combination of

0:45:50.960 --> 0:45:53.239
<v Speaker 3>breaking balls and a pretty good change up as well

0:45:53.280 --> 0:45:56.000
<v Speaker 3>that I think that's a really fun pitcher for them

0:45:56.040 --> 0:45:57.920
<v Speaker 3>to build on. And they say, Okay, well, maybe you know,

0:45:57.960 --> 0:46:00.000
<v Speaker 3>he finds a tick or so, or maybe he finds

0:46:00.160 --> 0:46:01.200
<v Speaker 3>change up or whatever it may be.

0:46:01.520 --> 0:46:04.359
<v Speaker 4>But Towns in like the cutter looks like it could

0:46:04.360 --> 0:46:05.560
<v Speaker 4>be an elite pitch.

0:46:05.600 --> 0:46:08.400
<v Speaker 3>It's just wipe out the slider off of that looks

0:46:08.400 --> 0:46:10.040
<v Speaker 3>like it could be a plus pitch as well. The

0:46:10.120 --> 0:46:12.720
<v Speaker 3>changeup is flashed above average hole mix and a curveball

0:46:12.760 --> 0:46:16.160
<v Speaker 3>as well, and the fastball like it's getting nineteen plus

0:46:16.200 --> 0:46:18.520
<v Speaker 3>inches avert. I just think his release can be a

0:46:18.520 --> 0:46:20.600
<v Speaker 3>little bit stock and I think hitters just tend to

0:46:20.600 --> 0:46:22.520
<v Speaker 3>see it pretty well. So that's something that you know

0:46:22.719 --> 0:46:24.759
<v Speaker 3>they'll they'll try to work through. But I don't think

0:46:24.960 --> 0:46:27.319
<v Speaker 3>of the group of arms, I don't think anybody has

0:46:27.360 --> 0:46:30.040
<v Speaker 3>it as complete of a pitch mix as Townsend does.

0:46:30.360 --> 0:46:32.279
<v Speaker 3>And I still think he can be able to work

0:46:32.320 --> 0:46:35.160
<v Speaker 3>through the fastball, maybe underperforming a little bit.

0:46:36.000 --> 0:46:38.520
<v Speaker 4>Why did he have the most? Oh? Go ahead, low?

0:46:38.640 --> 0:46:38.799
<v Speaker 5>Oh?

0:46:39.120 --> 0:46:41.560
<v Speaker 2>I was gonna say, there's still other guys to talk about,

0:46:41.640 --> 0:46:43.279
<v Speaker 2>But why do I feel like he's going to be

0:46:43.320 --> 0:46:45.279
<v Speaker 2>the pick? I was wondering who your answer was going

0:46:45.360 --> 0:46:48.040
<v Speaker 2>to be amongst this? He kind of feels like a Mariner.

0:46:48.080 --> 0:46:50.280
<v Speaker 2>And it's not just because you said it. That's exactly

0:46:50.280 --> 0:46:52.000
<v Speaker 2>the name Joe Doyle throughout to us a couple of

0:46:52.000 --> 0:46:55.080
<v Speaker 2>months ago, like the right. Yeah, so you guys have

0:46:55.120 --> 0:46:57.720
<v Speaker 2>both said Townshend feels like a really good fit, paired

0:46:57.760 --> 0:47:01.279
<v Speaker 2>with again right handed college arm, decently polish, like has

0:47:01.280 --> 0:47:03.000
<v Speaker 2>a couple of pitchers that have the chance to be

0:47:03.080 --> 0:47:05.000
<v Speaker 2>really really plus offerings.

0:47:05.280 --> 0:47:05.680
<v Speaker 5>I don't know.

0:47:05.760 --> 0:47:08.520
<v Speaker 2>For some reason, I'll call my shot here now and

0:47:08.560 --> 0:47:10.600
<v Speaker 2>I have nowhere near the information that people like you

0:47:10.600 --> 0:47:13.360
<v Speaker 2>and Joe do, But I feel like that's gonna be

0:47:13.360 --> 0:47:14.240
<v Speaker 2>the pick if he's there.

0:47:15.200 --> 0:47:17.160
<v Speaker 3>It's exactly how I felt when I was going through it.

0:47:17.200 --> 0:47:18.520
<v Speaker 3>And the other fun part is, I know a lot

0:47:18.560 --> 0:47:20.280
<v Speaker 3>of teams kind of subscribe to this, but the Mariners

0:47:20.280 --> 0:47:23.000
<v Speaker 3>as much as any they don't draft the era right,

0:47:23.040 --> 0:47:24.920
<v Speaker 3>and it's like a four to seven eight career era

0:47:25.120 --> 0:47:29.040
<v Speaker 3>for Townsend, late Bloomer in terms of just like really

0:47:29.160 --> 0:47:33.160
<v Speaker 3>finding it command wise. This past year, you walk twenty

0:47:33.200 --> 0:47:36.200
<v Speaker 3>and thirty four innings twenty twenty five, and he walked

0:47:36.200 --> 0:47:39.840
<v Speaker 3>twenty two and double the innings, you know, this past season.

0:47:40.200 --> 0:47:42.480
<v Speaker 3>I always feel like the Mariners love those up arrow

0:47:42.560 --> 0:47:45.520
<v Speaker 3>guys that still aren't even close to hitting that next step,

0:47:46.320 --> 0:47:47.400
<v Speaker 3>and it's a template that.

0:47:47.440 --> 0:47:49.160
<v Speaker 4>I just think they can work really well with.

0:47:50.239 --> 0:47:52.799
<v Speaker 1>Does he have the highest upside of this batch of

0:47:52.840 --> 0:47:54.640
<v Speaker 1>pitchers at that pick or is there someone else?

0:47:55.160 --> 0:47:57.520
<v Speaker 3>Pitching is so tough because it's like an abstract dar

0:47:57.640 --> 0:47:59.360
<v Speaker 3>like there'll be guys that I just don't think have

0:47:59.400 --> 0:48:01.680
<v Speaker 3>the same up but then they add two pitches, or

0:48:01.719 --> 0:48:04.520
<v Speaker 3>they find something and or they find two ticks and

0:48:04.520 --> 0:48:05.720
<v Speaker 3>it's like holy crap.

0:48:06.120 --> 0:48:07.279
<v Speaker 4>So you never know.

0:48:07.760 --> 0:48:11.960
<v Speaker 3>But when you look at like Cold Carlin, like it's

0:48:12.320 --> 0:48:15.920
<v Speaker 3>there's a reliever risk there, but he has a wipeout

0:48:15.960 --> 0:48:18.920
<v Speaker 3>slider from the left side and average ninety six with

0:48:18.960 --> 0:48:22.799
<v Speaker 3>his fastball, So like theoretically, if he finds a third

0:48:22.840 --> 0:48:26.120
<v Speaker 3>pitch that's more reliable and he's filling up the zone,

0:48:27.120 --> 0:48:28.440
<v Speaker 3>that guy could have his high of a ceiling he

0:48:28.440 --> 0:48:30.400
<v Speaker 3>as anybody. But for me, when I'm looking at just

0:48:30.440 --> 0:48:32.799
<v Speaker 3>the template and what i'd want to work with and

0:48:33.200 --> 0:48:34.600
<v Speaker 3>what you can kind of build off of as a

0:48:34.640 --> 0:48:37.160
<v Speaker 3>starting pitcher, I think Townsend does have the highest ceiling

0:48:37.360 --> 0:48:39.160
<v Speaker 3>because even when you go to like Tikan Kun's like

0:48:40.040 --> 0:48:42.839
<v Speaker 3>fastball's got great shape at ninety three to ninety five,

0:48:43.160 --> 0:48:45.319
<v Speaker 3>but then the secondary's just lagged behind. He's got a

0:48:45.320 --> 0:48:47.759
<v Speaker 3>good curveball. I think that looks like a plus pitch,

0:48:47.760 --> 0:48:49.839
<v Speaker 3>but that's the upper seventies curveball. So you always wonder

0:48:50.040 --> 0:48:52.120
<v Speaker 3>how some of those like slower breaking balls are going

0:48:52.160 --> 0:48:54.439
<v Speaker 3>to perform against professional hitters. I think it'll perform well,

0:48:54.680 --> 0:48:57.600
<v Speaker 3>But then the gyro slider didn't perform as well, and

0:48:57.880 --> 0:49:00.840
<v Speaker 3>the rest of the secondary's just lag behind Mason Edwards.

0:49:00.840 --> 0:49:06.280
<v Speaker 3>It's like ceiling wise left inner from usc like low nineties.

0:49:06.960 --> 0:49:09.239
<v Speaker 3>He has some deception to his delivery, but anytime I'm

0:49:09.280 --> 0:49:10.920
<v Speaker 3>using the word deception, the ceiling is not going to

0:49:10.960 --> 0:49:13.160
<v Speaker 3>be as high. So it's a low nineties with deception.

0:49:13.239 --> 0:49:16.440
<v Speaker 3>Crossfire curveball is a banger, but this is a guy

0:49:16.480 --> 0:49:18.560
<v Speaker 3>that's going to need to execute to have success. So

0:49:19.520 --> 0:49:22.160
<v Speaker 3>I do think Talenten has the best or the highest

0:49:22.239 --> 0:49:25.799
<v Speaker 3>ceiling of those guys, assuming Carlin doesn't like spawn a

0:49:25.800 --> 0:49:27.840
<v Speaker 3>new pitch and just just you know, have this like

0:49:27.880 --> 0:49:29.440
<v Speaker 3>Peytent Toley type of ascension.

0:49:30.200 --> 0:49:33.200
<v Speaker 1>What about someone like Cameron Flukey, who we've also seen.

0:49:34.280 --> 0:49:35.960
<v Speaker 4>Sheer raw ceiling.

0:49:36.239 --> 0:49:39.200
<v Speaker 3>You could make the Flukey case, and I think that

0:49:39.239 --> 0:49:41.360
<v Speaker 3>would be the one guy that I think has maybe

0:49:41.360 --> 0:49:44.680
<v Speaker 3>the highest individual ceiling of the bunch. But he also

0:49:45.000 --> 0:49:49.120
<v Speaker 3>comes with like, you know, some concerned floor wise, you know,

0:49:49.200 --> 0:49:51.920
<v Speaker 3>like he's coming off of injury that limited him a

0:49:51.920 --> 0:49:54.640
<v Speaker 3>fair amount this year. His fastball maybe as good as

0:49:54.760 --> 0:49:57.160
<v Speaker 3>is just about anybody's in the draft. You look at

0:49:57.160 --> 0:49:59.360
<v Speaker 3>Flora like that's probably the gold standard in general in

0:49:59.360 --> 0:50:02.440
<v Speaker 3>the draft, but there's effort in the delivery. It's a

0:50:02.480 --> 0:50:06.240
<v Speaker 3>long arm action. The command just off of the injury

0:50:06.560 --> 0:50:10.160
<v Speaker 3>just wasn't there. But when you look at what could

0:50:10.160 --> 0:50:14.200
<v Speaker 3>be with Fluky, this is a guy that has again,

0:50:14.320 --> 0:50:16.879
<v Speaker 3>I would say other than Flora, probably has the second

0:50:16.960 --> 0:50:20.399
<v Speaker 3>highest ceiling pitching wise in the draft. Maybe you could

0:50:20.440 --> 0:50:23.080
<v Speaker 3>probably throw Gio Rohash because he's a prep left. He

0:50:23.120 --> 0:50:25.520
<v Speaker 3>throws fuzz as well. But I think when you look

0:50:25.520 --> 0:50:28.759
<v Speaker 3>at Fluki's fastball and pair of breaking balls and he's

0:50:28.800 --> 0:50:31.160
<v Speaker 3>six six, that's someone that I think the Mariners will

0:50:31.160 --> 0:50:32.719
<v Speaker 3>look at though, and if they picked him, it's like

0:50:32.960 --> 0:50:34.719
<v Speaker 3>we feel confident that we can clean a couple of

0:50:34.719 --> 0:50:37.279
<v Speaker 3>things up with the delivery, and if he's healthy, he

0:50:37.280 --> 0:50:40.120
<v Speaker 3>can be a rocket ship. But you're gonna have a

0:50:40.160 --> 0:50:42.279
<v Speaker 3>lot more I think hands on work there to get

0:50:42.280 --> 0:50:44.600
<v Speaker 3>to that ceiling if.

0:50:44.520 --> 0:50:46.680
<v Speaker 2>They're gonna go position player. As we start to wrap

0:50:46.680 --> 0:50:50.440
<v Speaker 2>this conversation up, you already mentioned Bo Lawrence. We can

0:50:50.480 --> 0:50:53.239
<v Speaker 2>start with him, but if they go bat over arm

0:50:53.280 --> 0:50:55.880
<v Speaker 2>in this draft, Bo Lawrence is the high school bad

0:50:55.880 --> 0:50:57.360
<v Speaker 2>who you're really high on. So why do you like

0:50:57.400 --> 0:50:58.280
<v Speaker 2>the guy?

0:50:58.440 --> 0:51:00.719
<v Speaker 3>Swing is so advanced and I think there's so much

0:51:00.760 --> 0:51:03.120
<v Speaker 3>projection in there too. He's younger for the class. He's

0:51:03.160 --> 0:51:05.640
<v Speaker 3>still eighteen years old, will be eighteen until September, middle

0:51:05.640 --> 0:51:10.520
<v Speaker 3>of September six five, two hundred, and really is moving

0:51:10.560 --> 0:51:12.560
<v Speaker 3>well on the left side of the infield. For he

0:51:12.560 --> 0:51:14.239
<v Speaker 3>may ultimately slide over to third, but I think he

0:51:14.239 --> 0:51:16.080
<v Speaker 3>could be really solid there and they'll probably give him

0:51:16.080 --> 0:51:17.759
<v Speaker 3>some opportunity.

0:51:17.160 --> 0:51:17.799
<v Speaker 4>To prove that he could.

0:51:17.880 --> 0:51:21.000
<v Speaker 3>He could stick it short, but regardless, like moves really

0:51:21.040 --> 0:51:22.160
<v Speaker 3>well on the left side of the infield.

0:51:22.480 --> 0:51:25.080
<v Speaker 4>I'm just so impressed at how smooth the swing.

0:51:24.960 --> 0:51:27.400
<v Speaker 3>Is for a kid that's that big and long levered

0:51:27.440 --> 0:51:31.400
<v Speaker 3>and just just already so ahead in that regard, and

0:51:31.440 --> 0:51:33.239
<v Speaker 3>you think about how much power could be in there

0:51:33.400 --> 0:51:35.560
<v Speaker 3>as he just continues to fill out, because he's still

0:51:35.640 --> 0:51:38.719
<v Speaker 3>just very slender and the swing is very smooth. But

0:51:38.760 --> 0:51:40.600
<v Speaker 3>I think could he could generate a little bit more

0:51:40.680 --> 0:51:43.200
<v Speaker 3>violence in there, but it's all already so repeatable.

0:51:43.360 --> 0:51:44.720
<v Speaker 4>He has such a good feel for the barrel.

0:51:44.719 --> 0:51:46.320
<v Speaker 3>You know he's going to grow into more strength and

0:51:47.239 --> 0:51:49.400
<v Speaker 3>I think kind of fits the bill of the Mariners

0:51:49.480 --> 0:51:52.240
<v Speaker 3>really focus on the way kids carry themselves.

0:51:52.360 --> 0:51:54.160
<v Speaker 4>I really like the way he goes about his business.

0:51:54.160 --> 0:51:55.960
<v Speaker 3>I think this is a guy that's very mature for

0:51:56.120 --> 0:51:58.600
<v Speaker 3>his age, and that's big reason why the Mariners have

0:51:58.600 --> 0:52:01.160
<v Speaker 3>so much success out of the draft too. I think

0:52:01.239 --> 0:52:04.880
<v Speaker 3>Lawrence checks a lot of their boxes and and again

0:52:04.920 --> 0:52:06.520
<v Speaker 3>I think fits the bill of the type of high

0:52:06.520 --> 0:52:07.960
<v Speaker 3>scores that they've had success with.

0:52:08.680 --> 0:52:10.040
<v Speaker 1>What other bats do you have in mind?

0:52:10.480 --> 0:52:12.640
<v Speaker 3>I think the other that I've heard a decent about

0:52:12.960 --> 0:52:15.080
<v Speaker 3>a bit about, and I think you're gonna have a

0:52:15.120 --> 0:52:16.800
<v Speaker 3>lot of pressure on the bat, but manags are a

0:52:16.840 --> 0:52:19.080
<v Speaker 3>lot to like with the bat is Logan Hughes.

0:52:19.920 --> 0:52:22.040
<v Speaker 4>Crazy bat speed, can.

0:52:22.040 --> 0:52:26.480
<v Speaker 3>Absolutely pulverize velocity and and is good enough against breaking balls.

0:52:26.520 --> 0:52:28.560
<v Speaker 3>I think the swing is you don't want to see

0:52:28.640 --> 0:52:30.560
<v Speaker 3>much change from there, Like he's he's already in a

0:52:30.600 --> 0:52:33.040
<v Speaker 3>really good spot. And I just think from what you

0:52:33.080 --> 0:52:36.799
<v Speaker 3>see from him production wise, I could see Hughes being

0:52:36.840 --> 0:52:38.279
<v Speaker 3>a guy that they just get excited about.

0:52:38.280 --> 0:52:38.520
<v Speaker 4>The bat.

0:52:38.520 --> 0:52:40.160
<v Speaker 3>You see like a dom Can zone type like it

0:52:40.239 --> 0:52:42.920
<v Speaker 3>kind of fits, kind of fits that mold. There's just

0:52:42.960 --> 0:52:45.080
<v Speaker 3>so much violence to the swing, but also at the

0:52:45.080 --> 0:52:47.440
<v Speaker 3>same time pretty controlled and making a lot more contact

0:52:47.480 --> 0:52:48.160
<v Speaker 3>than you'd expect.

0:52:49.560 --> 0:52:52.520
<v Speaker 2>So who's your so who's your narrator's prospect? That's going

0:52:52.560 --> 0:52:53.719
<v Speaker 2>to go off in the second half or.

0:52:53.640 --> 0:52:55.359
<v Speaker 4>Having a good two And I'm sorry I was not

0:52:55.400 --> 0:52:56.479
<v Speaker 4>ready for that off the dome.

0:52:56.920 --> 0:52:59.319
<v Speaker 5>We kind of we kind of sideswiped you with that question.

0:52:59.400 --> 0:52:59.960
<v Speaker 5>But I don't know.

0:53:00.040 --> 0:53:02.839
<v Speaker 3>I've been a little bit slow on the last couple

0:53:02.880 --> 0:53:05.520
<v Speaker 3>of days fighting this cold, I swear, But Johnny Farmelo

0:53:05.560 --> 0:53:07.480
<v Speaker 3>has been on another planet, and that one should have

0:53:07.480 --> 0:53:08.960
<v Speaker 3>been on the top of my head right away, just

0:53:09.000 --> 0:53:13.120
<v Speaker 3>because I think Farmelo I talk about personality and makeup

0:53:13.160 --> 0:53:16.440
<v Speaker 3>that you buy into, but just just also has always

0:53:16.440 --> 0:53:19.480
<v Speaker 3>had all the talent. It's just been injured, frankly, like

0:53:19.520 --> 0:53:22.480
<v Speaker 3>it's just been not being available and not really being

0:53:22.520 --> 0:53:24.680
<v Speaker 3>able to develop properly. You know, last thirty games, he's

0:53:24.680 --> 0:53:26.400
<v Speaker 3>got one thousand and forty two oh ps a one

0:53:26.440 --> 0:53:29.160
<v Speaker 3>to sixty five WRC plus he's coming along defensively in

0:53:29.200 --> 0:53:31.800
<v Speaker 3>center field. I think the fact that he's chipped away

0:53:31.840 --> 0:53:33.799
<v Speaker 3>at some of the swing and miss well and in

0:53:33.840 --> 0:53:36.120
<v Speaker 3>that span, by the way, only twenty two percent strikeout. Right,

0:53:36.239 --> 0:53:39.040
<v Speaker 3>He's patient, He's sitting the ball hard, don't I'm really

0:53:39.040 --> 0:53:42.160
<v Speaker 3>excited about what Farmelo's doing. And then Nick Becker, it's

0:53:42.200 --> 0:53:44.480
<v Speaker 3>going to be a challenge for him at low a like.

0:53:44.680 --> 0:53:47.920
<v Speaker 3>I think that's going to be a general challenge, but

0:53:48.560 --> 0:53:52.239
<v Speaker 3>the quality of contact and speed combination is crazy, So

0:53:52.320 --> 0:53:54.799
<v Speaker 3>once he gets up from the complex, there might be

0:53:54.840 --> 0:53:56.359
<v Speaker 3>some swing and miss, but I think there's a guy

0:53:56.400 --> 0:53:58.120
<v Speaker 3>that's going to turn enough heads with with what he

0:53:58.160 --> 0:54:02.600
<v Speaker 3>can bring to the table defense, speed wise, power wise,

0:54:02.840 --> 0:54:04.759
<v Speaker 3>and with how much more power could be in the

0:54:04.760 --> 0:54:07.920
<v Speaker 3>tank for this nineteen year old. He's been really productive

0:54:07.960 --> 0:54:10.160
<v Speaker 3>at the complex, but I think if you can find

0:54:10.160 --> 0:54:11.439
<v Speaker 3>a way to cut down on the whiff a little

0:54:11.440 --> 0:54:14.880
<v Speaker 3>bit more, this guy could be a monster with the power, speed, power,

0:54:14.880 --> 0:54:15.960
<v Speaker 3>speed defense combination.

0:54:17.160 --> 0:54:17.399
<v Speaker 4>ARM.

0:54:17.440 --> 0:54:19.680
<v Speaker 1>This has been awesome as always. We will all be

0:54:19.800 --> 0:54:21.719
<v Speaker 1>together for the draft, so that should be a ton

0:54:21.760 --> 0:54:23.319
<v Speaker 1>of fun and we'll love to get to check with

0:54:23.360 --> 0:54:26.600
<v Speaker 1>you in person about whatever goes down this weekend in

0:54:26.640 --> 0:54:29.480
<v Speaker 1>Philadelphia and the Mariners pick at number twenty four. Always

0:54:29.520 --> 0:54:31.560
<v Speaker 1>appreciate you taking some time to come on with us

0:54:31.600 --> 0:54:34.360
<v Speaker 1>and hope to have you on again soon anytime.

0:54:34.400 --> 0:54:36.000
<v Speaker 4>Guys. You know I love it. I appreciate you guys

0:54:36.040 --> 0:54:39.600
<v Speaker 4>having me on well.

0:54:39.640 --> 0:54:40.520
<v Speaker 5>Shout out to ARM.

0:54:40.680 --> 0:54:42.960
<v Speaker 2>I'm definitely fired up for the draft on Sunday and

0:54:43.040 --> 0:54:45.359
<v Speaker 2>I cannot wait to see what a bunch of these

0:54:45.400 --> 0:54:48.840
<v Speaker 2>prospects have in the second half, Kid Sloan Farmelo, a

0:54:48.840 --> 0:54:51.959
<v Speaker 2>bunch of these guys, our guy Nicki Becker. Arm's great

0:54:52.040 --> 0:54:54.680
<v Speaker 2>and unlike TJ said at the start, the way he

0:54:54.719 --> 0:54:58.399
<v Speaker 2>breaks things down is really really informative, and every time

0:54:58.440 --> 0:55:00.680
<v Speaker 2>we talk with Arm, I always end up learning so much.

0:55:01.239 --> 0:55:03.160
<v Speaker 2>Let me just make one quick note before we start

0:55:03.200 --> 0:55:05.880
<v Speaker 2>to wrap up the pod. We didn't talk at the

0:55:05.880 --> 0:55:08.080
<v Speaker 2>start of the show about the scene around Seattle on

0:55:08.239 --> 0:55:10.200
<v Speaker 2>Monday for the World Cup, So let me just say,

0:55:10.840 --> 0:55:14.719
<v Speaker 2>very very very cool environment. It was packed as we

0:55:14.760 --> 0:55:16.040
<v Speaker 2>all thought it was going to be. It was a

0:55:16.160 --> 0:55:19.080
<v Speaker 2>very cool scene around the stadiums. All that being said,

0:55:20.160 --> 0:55:21.520
<v Speaker 2>Tmusa is a bunch of frauds.

0:55:23.080 --> 0:55:24.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean this is typical, right.

0:55:25.239 --> 0:55:25.799
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

0:55:25.880 --> 0:55:29.359
<v Speaker 1>You get to the point where you play countries where

0:55:29.360 --> 0:55:33.719
<v Speaker 1>they have better players at every position, and it's like yeah,

0:55:33.760 --> 0:55:35.920
<v Speaker 1>and then someone like me who doesn't actually watch soccer

0:55:35.960 --> 0:55:38.520
<v Speaker 1>realizes like, okay, like all the players and the other

0:55:38.560 --> 0:55:41.400
<v Speaker 1>teams play in the Premier League or in at PSG

0:55:41.640 --> 0:55:44.520
<v Speaker 1>or something, all these top teams and in the US

0:55:44.600 --> 0:55:46.960
<v Speaker 1>it's like not really, It's.

0:55:46.840 --> 0:55:50.200
<v Speaker 2>Like, oh, it's like Christian Polisic sometimes starts in the

0:55:50.239 --> 0:55:52.360
<v Speaker 2>Premier League, it's like, oh, that's our best player.

0:55:53.200 --> 0:55:55.680
<v Speaker 1>Then reality sets in and you're like, oh, oh yeah,

0:55:55.920 --> 0:55:59.040
<v Speaker 1>right right. See in other countries, well they pay youth

0:55:59.080 --> 0:56:01.239
<v Speaker 1>players to play in their academies. In the US, you

0:56:01.320 --> 0:56:03.160
<v Speaker 1>have to pay for it, and that kind of it

0:56:03.360 --> 0:56:05.719
<v Speaker 1>kind of answers the question on why soccer players aren't

0:56:05.719 --> 0:56:06.080
<v Speaker 1>as good.

0:56:06.760 --> 0:56:12.400
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Poliitic really does not have one single standout World

0:56:12.400 --> 0:56:13.319
<v Speaker 2>Cup moment, does he.

0:56:13.480 --> 0:56:16.680
<v Speaker 5>Like Donovan's had, his, Dempsey had his Politic does not

0:56:16.719 --> 0:56:17.080
<v Speaker 5>have one.

0:56:17.400 --> 0:56:19.239
<v Speaker 1>I mean his standout moment from this World Cup was

0:56:19.320 --> 0:56:21.239
<v Speaker 1>him getting kicked in the calf and missing a game

0:56:21.239 --> 0:56:21.680
<v Speaker 1>and a half.

0:56:22.080 --> 0:56:22.520
<v Speaker 4>Mm hmm.

0:56:25.040 --> 0:56:25.680
<v Speaker 5>That was too bad.

0:56:25.760 --> 0:56:27.440
<v Speaker 2>It would have been such a cool scene if if

0:56:27.440 --> 0:56:29.600
<v Speaker 2>they had won, like the scene afterwards if they had won.

0:56:29.960 --> 0:56:31.920
<v Speaker 1>But it was still really fun down there. As you

0:56:31.920 --> 0:56:35.919
<v Speaker 1>talked about, every single viewing party anywhere at any bar

0:56:36.239 --> 0:56:38.359
<v Speaker 1>or any any of the ones the city put on

0:56:38.400 --> 0:56:42.600
<v Speaker 1>were all just jam packed. Every single neighborhood had hundreds,

0:56:42.640 --> 0:56:44.920
<v Speaker 1>if not thousands of people crowded around the screens to

0:56:44.960 --> 0:56:47.680
<v Speaker 1>watch these games. Unfortunately, it was just kind of flat,

0:56:48.040 --> 0:56:50.799
<v Speaker 1>so flat from about like the thirtieth minute on.

0:56:51.040 --> 0:56:53.239
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean they scored it, tie it up in

0:56:53.320 --> 0:56:56.240
<v Speaker 2>thirty thirty seconds later, let up another.

0:56:56.040 --> 0:56:58.400
<v Speaker 1>Goal and then yeah, it didn't score again. Now it

0:56:58.400 --> 0:56:59.960
<v Speaker 1>was a bummer. It would have been nice if it continued.

0:57:00.040 --> 0:57:02.759
<v Speaker 1>But at least we did get the maximum amount of

0:57:02.800 --> 0:57:05.200
<v Speaker 1>like great games in Seattle as we possibly could of,

0:57:05.400 --> 0:57:05.799
<v Speaker 1>so that.

0:57:05.800 --> 0:57:06.399
<v Speaker 5>Was pretty great.

0:57:06.560 --> 0:57:09.080
<v Speaker 2>If there's one Seattle takeaway from this World Cup, we

0:57:09.160 --> 0:57:10.919
<v Speaker 2>already know it, but hopefully the rest of the world

0:57:10.960 --> 0:57:13.239
<v Speaker 2>knows it now. Seattle's a pretty awesome sports town.

0:57:13.400 --> 0:57:15.000
<v Speaker 5>It really is. Fans show out.

0:57:15.200 --> 0:57:18.560
<v Speaker 1>Now, they really did. For a bunch of people, including myself,

0:57:18.600 --> 0:57:21.200
<v Speaker 1>we don't really watch soccer, but for an event like this,

0:57:21.400 --> 0:57:22.520
<v Speaker 1>you have to show out.

0:57:22.760 --> 0:57:25.919
<v Speaker 2>Yeah all right, That just about wraps up this edition

0:57:25.960 --> 0:57:27.160
<v Speaker 2>of the Marine Layer podcast.

0:57:27.280 --> 0:57:28.120
<v Speaker 5>You guys know the drill.

0:57:28.200 --> 0:57:30.000
<v Speaker 2>If you want to listen to the full form podcast,

0:57:30.040 --> 0:57:32.200
<v Speaker 2>you can do so wherever you get your audio pods.

0:57:32.440 --> 0:57:34.640
<v Speaker 2>Make sure to download these episodes. If you're listening, go

0:57:34.720 --> 0:57:36.840
<v Speaker 2>rate and review. Please leave at five stars. If you're

0:57:36.880 --> 0:57:39.640
<v Speaker 2>listening to these podcasts, and if you're watching on YouTube,

0:57:39.760 --> 0:57:41.680
<v Speaker 2>just take a second make sure to go hit that

0:57:41.720 --> 0:57:44.200
<v Speaker 2>subscribe button. You can find us on our website too.

0:57:44.360 --> 0:57:47.760
<v Speaker 2>We're at Marine Layerpod dot com, where our episodes are

0:57:47.800 --> 0:57:51.000
<v Speaker 2>all there, Patreon's there, podcast merch is all there. Go

0:57:51.160 --> 0:57:53.880
<v Speaker 2>check it out Marine layerpod dot com, and then find

0:57:53.960 --> 0:57:56.840
<v Speaker 2>us on social media. We're everywhere. We're posting content every

0:57:56.920 --> 0:58:00.560
<v Speaker 2>single day at Marine layer Pod. That's TJ a'm lyle.

0:58:00.760 --> 0:58:02.880
<v Speaker 2>As always, we thank you guys for tuning in. We'll

0:58:02.880 --> 0:58:03.560
<v Speaker 2>talk to you soon.