WEBVTT - Draft Show: Grade That Prospect

0:00:10.680 --> 0:00:13.240
<v Speaker 1>The following. He's a production of Dallas Cowboys dot Com

0:00:13.280 --> 0:00:23.560
<v Speaker 1>and the Dallas Cowboys Football Club. Is the Dallas Cowboys

0:00:23.600 --> 0:00:28.480
<v Speaker 1>dot Com Draft Show, your war room for incenter news

0:00:28.520 --> 0:00:32.280
<v Speaker 1>and trapped analysis from deep within the confines of Cowboys

0:00:32.280 --> 0:00:38.360
<v Speaker 1>headquarters at the Star in Frisco. Running Back and now

0:00:38.520 --> 0:00:44.840
<v Speaker 1>your hosts David Hellman, Jeff Kavanaugh, Kevin Turner and Kyle Yeoman's.

0:00:47.240 --> 0:00:51.120
<v Speaker 1>We are now seventy seven days away from the NFL

0:00:51.320 --> 0:00:56.000
<v Speaker 1>Draft here in twenty twenty. As we keep rolling on

0:00:56.360 --> 0:00:59.400
<v Speaker 1>looking forward to the combine coming up in just a

0:00:59.440 --> 0:01:02.320
<v Speaker 1>couple of weeks. We are the Dallas Cowboys dot Com

0:01:02.400 --> 0:01:06.199
<v Speaker 1>Draft Show. Jeff Kavanaugh, Kevin Turner, David Hellman, I'm Kyle Yoman's.

0:01:06.200 --> 0:01:08.880
<v Speaker 1>Thanks so much for joining us, and guys, we are

0:01:09.120 --> 0:01:12.280
<v Speaker 1>eleven weeks now from the start of the NFL Draft.

0:01:12.319 --> 0:01:16.160
<v Speaker 1>We're five weeks into the show. Are we even that

0:01:16.240 --> 0:01:19.400
<v Speaker 1>much closer to finding out what the Dallas Cowboys are

0:01:19.400 --> 0:01:21.399
<v Speaker 1>gonna do in this draft than we were when we

0:01:21.480 --> 0:01:23.680
<v Speaker 1>started five weeks ago? You kind of freaked me out

0:01:23.680 --> 0:01:26.559
<v Speaker 1>just there, Honestly, what we were over one hundred days

0:01:26.600 --> 0:01:29.520
<v Speaker 1>when we started the show and it's already down near

0:01:29.600 --> 0:01:32.800
<v Speaker 1>two months seventy seven. I'm taking some liberties, but still

0:01:33.240 --> 0:01:36.880
<v Speaker 1>we're getting It's not a lot, it's creeping ever so slowly,

0:01:36.920 --> 0:01:41.600
<v Speaker 1>but steadily. And I don't know did to that question,

0:01:41.880 --> 0:01:43.360
<v Speaker 1>did you do you all feel like you have a

0:01:43.360 --> 0:01:45.959
<v Speaker 1>good grasp on this thing yet? Oh? Yeah, yeah, I

0:01:45.959 --> 0:01:49.559
<v Speaker 1>got it nailed at the Cowboys, do I got it nailed?

0:01:49.560 --> 0:01:51.120
<v Speaker 1>I saw a tweet from Dave the other day that

0:01:51.160 --> 0:01:53.920
<v Speaker 1>I totally agreed with. We're gonna go forever leading up

0:01:53.960 --> 0:01:57.120
<v Speaker 1>to the draft and everyone is gonna mock Grant Delpit

0:01:57.280 --> 0:02:00.000
<v Speaker 1>or Xavier McKinney to the Cowboys. Yeah, when they actually

0:02:00.080 --> 0:02:04.960
<v Speaker 1>we get to seventeen, the Cowboys and maybe us won't

0:02:05.040 --> 0:02:07.920
<v Speaker 1>necessarily feel like either one is worth the seventeenth pick. Ye,

0:02:08.040 --> 0:02:10.480
<v Speaker 1>they'll both be there. Either somebody will have slid to

0:02:10.520 --> 0:02:14.320
<v Speaker 1>them that'll get picked please Javon Kinla, or they'll trade

0:02:14.360 --> 0:02:16.600
<v Speaker 1>back and then pick one of these secondary guys, either

0:02:16.639 --> 0:02:18.800
<v Speaker 1>a corner or safety. Yeah. I know what they're doing. Yeah,

0:02:18.840 --> 0:02:20.400
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna have to look at all these mocks that

0:02:20.440 --> 0:02:22.720
<v Speaker 1>say they're gonna take a safety at seventeen, and then

0:02:22.720 --> 0:02:24.799
<v Speaker 1>they'll move back to take That's that's where my head

0:02:24.880 --> 0:02:28.680
<v Speaker 1>is at like every year, every year, there's always a

0:02:28.720 --> 0:02:32.240
<v Speaker 1>team that is just linked to a guy or two

0:02:32.360 --> 0:02:35.600
<v Speaker 1>or a handful of guys for months and it never

0:02:35.919 --> 0:02:38.840
<v Speaker 1>comes to fruition that cleanly. And that's how I feel

0:02:38.880 --> 0:02:41.880
<v Speaker 1>about Delpit and McKinney. We're gonna shock the world. Get

0:02:41.919 --> 0:02:45.080
<v Speaker 1>ready Henry Ruggs or Jalen Rager at seventeen, Let's dance

0:02:45.520 --> 0:02:49.480
<v Speaker 1>forty burgers baby score points a little more generally, though,

0:02:49.520 --> 0:02:51.880
<v Speaker 1>I all, this is this is what I always wonder

0:02:52.120 --> 0:02:55.080
<v Speaker 1>and I remember because it was around it was probably

0:02:55.120 --> 0:02:57.960
<v Speaker 1>around this time. I think it was February when Layton

0:02:58.040 --> 0:03:02.120
<v Speaker 1>vander esh kind of creeped into our cousness in twenty eighteen.

0:03:03.880 --> 0:03:07.239
<v Speaker 1>Have we hit on all of the names that will

0:03:07.280 --> 0:03:10.440
<v Speaker 1>be in consideration when it's actually draft time or is

0:03:10.440 --> 0:03:14.079
<v Speaker 1>there somebody who's still lurking out there that's not really

0:03:14.160 --> 0:03:18.000
<v Speaker 1>on the radar? Hey, Japan Sa Turgrossmatos Julian o'quara there

0:03:18.040 --> 0:03:20.839
<v Speaker 1>I thrown some wild cards for defensive end were covered. Okay,

0:03:20.880 --> 0:03:23.160
<v Speaker 1>if we're doing a quara there, then where we don't

0:03:23.160 --> 0:03:25.400
<v Speaker 1>need to draft at seventeen. Just wait for the combine.

0:03:25.720 --> 0:03:29.040
<v Speaker 1>Wait for the combine coming. I think all the cornerbacks.

0:03:29.320 --> 0:03:31.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean, whether it's Trevon Diggs, whether it's Christian Fulton,

0:03:31.680 --> 0:03:34.760
<v Speaker 1>whether it's c. J. Henderson, whether it's Jeff Gladney, who

0:03:34.800 --> 0:03:37.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm higher on than most of the world, but whether

0:03:37.200 --> 0:03:40.280
<v Speaker 1>it's uh, you know whoever. Maybe there's the way you're saying, Gladney,

0:03:40.320 --> 0:03:42.320
<v Speaker 1>it's seventeen if you want to, if you want to

0:03:42.320 --> 0:03:45.800
<v Speaker 1>get wild with it, Yeah, I've seen it possible him

0:03:45.800 --> 0:03:48.360
<v Speaker 1>at seventeen, mainly pegged as a second round pick, but

0:03:48.520 --> 0:03:50.280
<v Speaker 1>I could see him at fifty one. Who the hell

0:03:50.320 --> 0:03:53.480
<v Speaker 1>knows what they're really talking about in February, Yeah, exactly,

0:03:53.520 --> 0:03:56.800
<v Speaker 1>And that's that's but I have less I see what

0:03:56.840 --> 0:03:59.360
<v Speaker 1>you're saying about the safeties. I think I have less

0:03:59.400 --> 0:04:02.040
<v Speaker 1>confidence in them drafting safety in the first round, so

0:04:02.160 --> 0:04:06.560
<v Speaker 1>do I maybe any other position. The closer we get

0:04:06.640 --> 0:04:09.040
<v Speaker 1>it kind of seems that way where it seems like, okay,

0:04:09.520 --> 0:04:12.080
<v Speaker 1>safety might not be the number one priority in terms

0:04:12.120 --> 0:04:14.680
<v Speaker 1>of that first round pick, because there are so many

0:04:14.680 --> 0:04:17.159
<v Speaker 1>different things that could happen, whether it is a wide

0:04:17.160 --> 0:04:20.000
<v Speaker 1>receiver to Jeff's Jeff's point, whether it's Rugs, or whether

0:04:20.040 --> 0:04:23.520
<v Speaker 1>it's a Lamb or Judy or somebody whoever falls wide

0:04:23.520 --> 0:04:25.359
<v Speaker 1>receiver wise, if you get one of those burners on

0:04:25.400 --> 0:04:27.960
<v Speaker 1>the back half of that first round, it seems like

0:04:28.040 --> 0:04:31.120
<v Speaker 1>maybe they could lean that way to add another weapon

0:04:31.160 --> 0:04:34.400
<v Speaker 1>on the outside, or you could go with a defensive tackle.

0:04:34.920 --> 0:04:38.760
<v Speaker 1>Kin Law is pretty much the the Boise State connection

0:04:38.800 --> 0:04:41.039
<v Speaker 1>a lot. Even take Curtis Weaver two rounds too early

0:04:41.040 --> 0:04:44.600
<v Speaker 1>out of Boise, that'd be a bad plan. More on

0:04:44.680 --> 0:04:49.440
<v Speaker 1>Curtis Weaver in segment three. Though I have right around

0:04:49.600 --> 0:04:51.640
<v Speaker 1>twenty first round grades kind of where I'm at right

0:04:51.680 --> 0:04:54.920
<v Speaker 1>now looking at it um and but I started to

0:04:54.960 --> 0:04:57.000
<v Speaker 1>think about because we've been talking about Javon kin Law

0:04:57.040 --> 0:05:00.200
<v Speaker 1>from South Carolina a lot yep, and there's a lot

0:05:00.240 --> 0:05:02.039
<v Speaker 1>to be found out about him and his knee and

0:05:02.120 --> 0:05:05.120
<v Speaker 1>things like that. But I'm thinking about tears of the

0:05:05.160 --> 0:05:07.800
<v Speaker 1>first round. When does that first tier cut off? Okay,

0:05:07.880 --> 0:05:12.560
<v Speaker 1>so you're borrow Chase Young okuda, Uh, maybe you want

0:05:12.560 --> 0:05:15.320
<v Speaker 1>to throw Derek Brown in there? May yeah, Okay, still

0:05:15.320 --> 0:05:18.200
<v Speaker 1>have four or five guys right there. Simmons, Aah, Simmons,

0:05:18.240 --> 0:05:20.280
<v Speaker 1>I'll still him in there. Five. I think Ken Law

0:05:20.360 --> 0:05:22.720
<v Speaker 1>is going to sneak into that group. I think so

0:05:23.000 --> 0:05:26.080
<v Speaker 1>very possible. I'm tempted to go bold today, But I'll

0:05:26.120 --> 0:05:29.480
<v Speaker 1>wait another week and I'll let me let me double

0:05:29.480 --> 0:05:31.599
<v Speaker 1>and triple check my work before I tell you that

0:05:31.640 --> 0:05:35.279
<v Speaker 1>I'll take Javon Kinlaw over Derek Brown. Just let me

0:05:35.320 --> 0:05:38.000
<v Speaker 1>double and triple check my work before I commit to them.

0:05:38.040 --> 0:05:40.719
<v Speaker 1>Just want to pease it for right now. It's not insane.

0:05:41.040 --> 0:05:43.600
<v Speaker 1>I honestly, it's not because he's a monster. I mean

0:05:43.640 --> 0:05:47.560
<v Speaker 1>he is, He's legitimate, I mean, but so is Brown. Yeah,

0:05:47.640 --> 0:05:52.440
<v Speaker 1>Derek Brown? Both monsters upside though who gives you more upside?

0:05:52.440 --> 0:05:54.640
<v Speaker 1>Who's the same? Which one? Which one might have a

0:05:54.680 --> 0:05:58.800
<v Speaker 1>twelve sex season? I think, I mean maybe both. Really

0:05:58.960 --> 0:06:01.000
<v Speaker 1>I would get on Brown right now. I think I

0:06:01.000 --> 0:06:04.640
<v Speaker 1>would too, But regardless, I mean, we've talked a lot

0:06:04.680 --> 0:06:07.320
<v Speaker 1>of wide receivers, and we've talked a lot about guys

0:06:07.360 --> 0:06:10.640
<v Speaker 1>that could fall position wise and how deep that class

0:06:10.720 --> 0:06:12.920
<v Speaker 1>is going to be for wide receivers. Are there any

0:06:12.960 --> 0:06:16.039
<v Speaker 1>other positions though, that you're looking at in terms of

0:06:16.080 --> 0:06:19.960
<v Speaker 1>the depth? The depth that could either mean, hey, there's

0:06:20.000 --> 0:06:21.800
<v Speaker 1>a lot of guys at the very beginning that are

0:06:21.839 --> 0:06:24.120
<v Speaker 1>going to be the very top of the draft that

0:06:24.160 --> 0:06:26.279
<v Speaker 1>are going to be immediate starters, or is it guys

0:06:26.320 --> 0:06:28.560
<v Speaker 1>that you can potentially wait on for round three and

0:06:28.640 --> 0:06:30.200
<v Speaker 1>still going to be able to get a guy who

0:06:30.279 --> 0:06:32.800
<v Speaker 1>could be a starter. Tight End is deeper than I

0:06:32.839 --> 0:06:36.640
<v Speaker 1>initially thought it was. Really that's not exciting, and it's

0:06:36.680 --> 0:06:39.400
<v Speaker 1>not top heavy at all, but tight ends a little

0:06:39.440 --> 0:06:42.120
<v Speaker 1>better than I thought it was. Offensive tackle is a

0:06:42.160 --> 0:06:44.320
<v Speaker 1>little bit better than I mean, you're gonna have your

0:06:44.320 --> 0:06:46.640
<v Speaker 1>top heavy guys right there. We've talked about Jedrick Wills

0:06:46.640 --> 0:06:50.600
<v Speaker 1>from Alabama. We've talked about becked In from Louisville. We've

0:06:50.600 --> 0:06:53.719
<v Speaker 1>talked about Andrew Thomas from Georgia and Worf's from Iowa.

0:06:53.760 --> 0:06:55.680
<v Speaker 1>You know, those are those guys are probably first round

0:06:55.720 --> 0:06:58.840
<v Speaker 1>tap guys, but second third, fourth round offensive tackle. I

0:06:58.839 --> 0:07:00.479
<v Speaker 1>don't think this team needs to go there because I

0:07:00.480 --> 0:07:03.400
<v Speaker 1>think this team needs to go defense, defense, defense. Yeah,

0:07:03.400 --> 0:07:06.800
<v Speaker 1>for depending on this and that's the right wide receivers there.

0:07:06.839 --> 0:07:10.320
<v Speaker 1>In today's February six, we're a month away from you know,

0:07:10.840 --> 0:07:13.520
<v Speaker 1>deciding who you're going to place your franchise tag on

0:07:13.840 --> 0:07:15.400
<v Speaker 1>and things like that, and they're going to fill out

0:07:15.400 --> 0:07:17.360
<v Speaker 1>the roster and free agency to try to free up

0:07:17.360 --> 0:07:19.520
<v Speaker 1>their draft abilities. So we have no idea what the

0:07:19.520 --> 0:07:21.160
<v Speaker 1>team is going to look like. Which is all the fun.

0:07:21.280 --> 0:07:23.120
<v Speaker 1>That's why it's a lot of fun. That's why you

0:07:23.160 --> 0:07:25.320
<v Speaker 1>do have to actually look at the kings of tackles

0:07:25.320 --> 0:07:27.840
<v Speaker 1>and things like that. Even speaking in generalities, I mean,

0:07:27.880 --> 0:07:31.400
<v Speaker 1>I think offensive tackle. I'm very high on a lot

0:07:31.400 --> 0:07:33.320
<v Speaker 1>of these offensive tackles. Josh Jones is one that you

0:07:33.320 --> 0:07:35.800
<v Speaker 1>didn't mention out of Houston. He was at the Senior

0:07:35.840 --> 0:07:39.640
<v Speaker 1>Bowl and he bullied some people on the line. I

0:07:39.680 --> 0:07:41.680
<v Speaker 1>think he could be a first round talent. He's right

0:07:41.760 --> 0:07:43.480
<v Speaker 1>on the edge of a first round grade. For me,

0:07:43.520 --> 0:07:45.000
<v Speaker 1>I think he's right at the beginning of my second

0:07:45.080 --> 0:07:47.800
<v Speaker 1>round grade. He's athletic enough. He's my top second round

0:07:47.840 --> 0:07:50.520
<v Speaker 1>offensive linement. I thinks to tackle me as well. I

0:07:50.560 --> 0:07:54.040
<v Speaker 1>don't have it pulled up just yet, but there's I

0:07:54.080 --> 0:07:56.840
<v Speaker 1>think offensive tackle is just as deep in terms of

0:07:56.880 --> 0:07:59.600
<v Speaker 1>guys that you can maybe go back and develop as

0:08:00.000 --> 0:08:02.400
<v Speaker 1>a wide receiver class. Now, I'm not gonna say that

0:08:03.080 --> 0:08:05.120
<v Speaker 1>that they're even. I think wide receiver is definitely the

0:08:05.120 --> 0:08:09.080
<v Speaker 1>deepest position in this draft class. But I think offensive

0:08:09.120 --> 0:08:11.640
<v Speaker 1>tackles right there. I think, at least in the conversation.

0:08:12.320 --> 0:08:14.760
<v Speaker 1>It's it's interesting because, like we we've all said a

0:08:14.800 --> 0:08:18.520
<v Speaker 1>million times already, like you can find like ready made

0:08:18.560 --> 0:08:21.720
<v Speaker 1>receivers in the third and fourth round of this draft class. Probably, Yeah,

0:08:21.720 --> 0:08:24.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if that's true. For offensive tackle, I

0:08:24.160 --> 0:08:27.280
<v Speaker 1>think it's gonna be super top heavy, and like we

0:08:27.360 --> 0:08:30.800
<v Speaker 1>see every year, other than quarterback, that's one of the

0:08:30.840 --> 0:08:33.960
<v Speaker 1>positions teams are most ready to reach on because it's

0:08:34.040 --> 0:08:36.200
<v Speaker 1>it's so important and there just aren't that many good

0:08:36.280 --> 0:08:38.720
<v Speaker 1>offensive tackles to go around. That's why I mean, I'm

0:08:38.720 --> 0:08:42.880
<v Speaker 1>sitting here looking at probably as many as like five

0:08:43.040 --> 0:08:45.600
<v Speaker 1>that would go in the first round. That's another thing

0:08:45.640 --> 0:08:47.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm hoping for if I'm the Cowboys, is that those

0:08:47.559 --> 0:08:49.600
<v Speaker 1>guys keep going off the board. You look at those

0:08:49.600 --> 0:08:51.920
<v Speaker 1>teams in front of the Cowboys too. There's some teams

0:08:51.920 --> 0:08:55.040
<v Speaker 1>that really need some offensive line help, and so I

0:08:55.040 --> 0:08:57.840
<v Speaker 1>think the offensive tackles go off the board. Maybe bring

0:08:57.920 --> 0:09:00.480
<v Speaker 1>us the law maybe, And Justin Herbert was off the

0:09:00.520 --> 0:09:03.880
<v Speaker 1>board there that Jordan Love up in there. Get Jordan Yeah,

0:09:04.000 --> 0:09:06.800
<v Speaker 1>heyts a team, he sta panic and get a quarterback

0:09:06.920 --> 0:09:09.920
<v Speaker 1>DeAndre Swift. Let's get a running back in a It's

0:09:10.040 --> 0:09:12.120
<v Speaker 1>kind of the thing I think that's working negatively for

0:09:12.120 --> 0:09:14.439
<v Speaker 1>the Cowboys, as the fact that Philip Rivers is free

0:09:14.480 --> 0:09:17.680
<v Speaker 1>now and that Cam Newton's likely going to I would

0:09:17.679 --> 0:09:20.960
<v Speaker 1>assume he's going to get cut and go somewhere else. Um,

0:09:21.040 --> 0:09:23.120
<v Speaker 1>Jameis Winston is free and a team may try to

0:09:23.160 --> 0:09:26.400
<v Speaker 1>revitalize him. I think it's Teddy Bridgewater Taysom Hill. Like,

0:09:26.440 --> 0:09:28.520
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of guys who are kind of free

0:09:28.600 --> 0:09:32.080
<v Speaker 1>with Playsom Hill into that category. We're having fun, aren't we.

0:09:32.120 --> 0:09:35.079
<v Speaker 1>I guess I don't think anybody's gonna make Taysom Hill

0:09:35.120 --> 0:09:37.679
<v Speaker 1>their starter. This find the LA Chargers and I have

0:09:37.760 --> 0:09:40.920
<v Speaker 1>no fan base at all. Why not I'm signing Taysom Hill.

0:09:41.240 --> 0:09:44.160
<v Speaker 1>Why because I'm the LA Chargers. Baby. Would Mike Williams

0:09:44.240 --> 0:09:47.760
<v Speaker 1>quit the laharg Teenan Allen? Would he quit? They'd be like, listen,

0:09:47.800 --> 0:09:49.800
<v Speaker 1>we know that Taysom's running twenty times a game. I'm

0:09:49.800 --> 0:09:52.000
<v Speaker 1>not here for this. Large gives you need to put

0:09:52.240 --> 0:09:55.199
<v Speaker 1>butts in the seats and sell jerseys. Some Hill's exciting,

0:09:55.320 --> 0:09:58.360
<v Speaker 1>stop it. They're gonna draft Herbert or something they should like?

0:09:58.360 --> 0:10:00.560
<v Speaker 1>Can I get Taysom Hill and draft Jordan Love? You

0:10:00.720 --> 0:10:03.480
<v Speaker 1>probably could just okay, as long as Taysom Hill's not

0:10:03.520 --> 0:10:06.480
<v Speaker 1>You're like like day one's future and you're like, this

0:10:06.559 --> 0:10:09.560
<v Speaker 1>is our guy. He's only thirty, He's gonna get so

0:10:09.640 --> 0:10:12.960
<v Speaker 1>much better. Stop it. I will to the original, to

0:10:13.000 --> 0:10:16.079
<v Speaker 1>the original point. Like you know, it kind of goes

0:10:16.120 --> 0:10:18.160
<v Speaker 1>back to what we said at the top is you know,

0:10:19.000 --> 0:10:22.280
<v Speaker 1>everybody zeroed in on Grant delput and Xavier McKinney. That's fine.

0:10:22.280 --> 0:10:24.440
<v Speaker 1>I think they're both good players. I'd be happy drafting

0:10:24.440 --> 0:10:26.360
<v Speaker 1>either one of them in the first round, honestly, but

0:10:26.440 --> 0:10:28.640
<v Speaker 1>I'd be happy with one of those. Yet people fixate

0:10:28.720 --> 0:10:30.920
<v Speaker 1>on that, and I don't know. I don't know how

0:10:31.000 --> 0:10:33.360
<v Speaker 1>deep this. I don't know how deep it goes. But

0:10:33.440 --> 0:10:37.080
<v Speaker 1>I have now gotten eyes on safeties that I would

0:10:37.120 --> 0:10:40.000
<v Speaker 1>be happy to draft. I mean Winfield. We've been talking

0:10:40.040 --> 0:10:42.560
<v Speaker 1>about Antoine Winfield all week on Twitter. Let go. That

0:10:42.600 --> 0:10:46.000
<v Speaker 1>guy's freaking impressive. Man. He hits, He hits like a missile,

0:10:46.040 --> 0:10:49.640
<v Speaker 1>and he covers well. Utah, man's pretty good too, Burgess, Okay,

0:10:49.640 --> 0:10:51.839
<v Speaker 1>you tak guys interesting. It's hard to find on tape

0:10:51.880 --> 0:10:55.200
<v Speaker 1>because he lines up somewhere different every play. I have

0:10:55.240 --> 0:10:57.240
<v Speaker 1>to find him at the end of the play, rewind

0:10:57.240 --> 0:11:00.559
<v Speaker 1>and see where he started. He's very interesting. I I

0:11:00.640 --> 0:11:03.319
<v Speaker 1>was concerned about his measurements at the Senior Bowl when

0:11:03.320 --> 0:11:05.200
<v Speaker 1>he came in with thirty inch arms. Not that it

0:11:05.200 --> 0:11:07.559
<v Speaker 1>totally matters at safety how long you are, but he's

0:11:07.600 --> 0:11:10.640
<v Speaker 1>also on the short end of five to eleven. Happened

0:11:10.640 --> 0:11:12.959
<v Speaker 1>to my guy and I the defensive end out of Utah,

0:11:13.120 --> 0:11:14.880
<v Speaker 1>came in with the shorty arms after from a note

0:11:14.880 --> 0:11:17.040
<v Speaker 1>said offensive tackles. Can you get their hands on him?

0:11:17.640 --> 0:11:19.520
<v Speaker 1>Put your heart When you get a shorty arm, you

0:11:19.520 --> 0:11:21.600
<v Speaker 1>get a short army. Just needs you to be a

0:11:21.600 --> 0:11:24.040
<v Speaker 1>little bit better. There's a play stretch it though. Just

0:11:24.080 --> 0:11:25.720
<v Speaker 1>get somebody every day to kind of pull on it

0:11:25.720 --> 0:11:27.320
<v Speaker 1>a little bit. See if you can't get another half

0:11:27.320 --> 0:11:28.719
<v Speaker 1>inch out of that. And I want to tease a

0:11:28.760 --> 0:11:30.480
<v Speaker 1>head like stretched armstrong sty I want to tease a

0:11:30.480 --> 0:11:33.480
<v Speaker 1>head to the third sement because we're gonna get two guys.

0:11:33.800 --> 0:11:36.320
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna sit around here and we're gonna play GM.

0:11:36.320 --> 0:11:38.600
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna say, pick the guy who's the better player.

0:11:38.640 --> 0:11:40.600
<v Speaker 1>Who do you want the guy and the other guy

0:11:40.640 --> 0:11:42.920
<v Speaker 1>you're probably talking about his Brandon Jones out of Texas.

0:11:43.000 --> 0:11:45.280
<v Speaker 1>Briton Jones from Texas watched him yesterday. I don't want

0:11:45.280 --> 0:11:47.400
<v Speaker 1>to ruin the third segment, but I'm interested to hear

0:11:47.440 --> 0:11:51.000
<v Speaker 1>your takes on him, but awesome to that point, you know,

0:11:51.280 --> 0:11:53.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean, Delpitt and McKinney's probably your best bet to

0:11:53.960 --> 0:11:56.640
<v Speaker 1>be a I'll throw a Winfield in there at those

0:11:56.679 --> 0:12:00.760
<v Speaker 1>three could probably start day one. Ashton Davis. I'm higher

0:12:00.760 --> 0:12:04.080
<v Speaker 1>on Davis. We're gonna play Winfield and Davison Segment three two. Okay,

0:12:04.160 --> 0:12:05.880
<v Speaker 1>we'll put those two together. But I think what I

0:12:05.920 --> 0:12:08.880
<v Speaker 1>would say, there is there something about Winfield that makes

0:12:08.920 --> 0:12:10.320
<v Speaker 1>you go because there's a lot of people were going up,

0:12:10.360 --> 0:12:12.280
<v Speaker 1>well he's not tall enough, and I sit there and go, okay,

0:12:12.320 --> 0:12:14.439
<v Speaker 1>well his dad played the NFL for fourteen years. Now,

0:12:14.440 --> 0:12:17.080
<v Speaker 1>that doesn't mean he's going to be good. But everyone's

0:12:17.320 --> 0:12:20.440
<v Speaker 1>saying all these sized questions about Antoine Winfield junior. Well,

0:12:20.760 --> 0:12:23.920
<v Speaker 1>he's five eleven and he's kind of maybe he's five ten.

0:12:24.440 --> 0:12:26.880
<v Speaker 1>Gil get what his dad was. His dad was five

0:12:27.040 --> 0:12:31.280
<v Speaker 1>nine and one eighty. Now, I know evolution has changed. Well,

0:12:31.320 --> 0:12:33.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if it's so much evolution, No, I know,

0:12:33.640 --> 0:12:37.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't change that over humans have grown multiple inches

0:12:37.160 --> 0:12:40.120
<v Speaker 1>on average. You don't fifteen years. You don't think we're

0:12:40.120 --> 0:12:41.880
<v Speaker 1>not going about to get into this. I don't think

0:12:41.880 --> 0:12:44.280
<v Speaker 1>we've gone up two inches on average over the last

0:12:44.360 --> 0:12:47.280
<v Speaker 1>nine twenty years. Now, I don't think. Oh I don't know, man,

0:12:48.640 --> 0:12:52.280
<v Speaker 1>pretty yeah, I haven't been phased out yet, thankfully. Yeah.

0:12:52.320 --> 0:12:55.560
<v Speaker 1>But you should see my ancestors from fifteen years ago.

0:12:55.720 --> 0:12:59.440
<v Speaker 1>Tiny man, tiny, okay and little know in fact, I

0:12:59.440 --> 0:13:02.000
<v Speaker 1>have my family to be birds. Pull it back to

0:13:02.240 --> 0:13:05.200
<v Speaker 1>the road, please. But look looking at Winfield and you

0:13:05.240 --> 0:13:07.760
<v Speaker 1>mentioned his size, I mean on the board all the

0:13:07.800 --> 0:13:11.719
<v Speaker 1>way through position wise, he's the second shortest safety that

0:13:11.760 --> 0:13:14.520
<v Speaker 1>I've got on just in the draft class at the moment.

0:13:14.600 --> 0:13:16.560
<v Speaker 1>You know who the name I put in my notes

0:13:16.600 --> 0:13:19.320
<v Speaker 1>on in twin Winfield. They play different positions, but I said,

0:13:19.320 --> 0:13:21.240
<v Speaker 1>this is gonna be Desmond King all over again for

0:13:21.360 --> 0:13:23.880
<v Speaker 1>some teams. I love that the Iowa corner where it

0:13:23.920 --> 0:13:25.880
<v Speaker 1>was like, up he's a little too short. Up, he's

0:13:25.880 --> 0:13:28.280
<v Speaker 1>a little too slow. So like if Winfield runs in

0:13:28.320 --> 0:13:30.680
<v Speaker 1>the mid to high four fives and he measures in

0:13:30.760 --> 0:13:33.959
<v Speaker 1>at five nine and three quarters, teams will be like, oh,

0:13:33.960 --> 0:13:35.400
<v Speaker 1>he's a little too small and a little too slow,

0:13:35.440 --> 0:13:37.960
<v Speaker 1>and I'm gonna go cool. I like that you have

0:13:38.000 --> 0:13:41.079
<v Speaker 1>a physical profile to try to avoid missus. I'm willing

0:13:41.120 --> 0:13:42.960
<v Speaker 1>to take a shot him this one because he's an outlier,

0:13:42.960 --> 0:13:47.280
<v Speaker 1>because he's a bawler. He didn't look slow catching kJ Hammler,

0:13:47.320 --> 0:13:49.839
<v Speaker 1>who was not his assignment on a crossing route and

0:13:50.320 --> 0:13:52.439
<v Speaker 1>being there to make contact with him at the catch.

0:13:52.559 --> 0:13:55.920
<v Speaker 1>Like he is very impressive on teams. He sees it

0:13:55.960 --> 0:13:57.800
<v Speaker 1>fast too, he gets ahead of it. And I'm glad

0:13:57.800 --> 0:13:59.640
<v Speaker 1>you mentioned that play because it stands out of him

0:13:59.679 --> 0:14:02.000
<v Speaker 1>seeing something and then going And he also will tackle.

0:14:02.040 --> 0:14:04.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean he will. He needs to wrap up better,

0:14:04.720 --> 0:14:06.920
<v Speaker 1>but he's kind of got that safety vibe. I want

0:14:06.920 --> 0:14:09.360
<v Speaker 1>to knock you out and say he hits like a

0:14:09.440 --> 0:14:12.080
<v Speaker 1>sack of bricks. I'm not worried about his size at all.

0:14:12.400 --> 0:14:15.400
<v Speaker 1>But we're talking about Winfield in that third segment too.

0:14:15.400 --> 0:14:17.120
<v Speaker 1>But I want to kind of shift it back over

0:14:17.160 --> 0:14:20.640
<v Speaker 1>to what you were saying. You were talking about late safeties. Yeah,

0:14:20.760 --> 0:14:23.400
<v Speaker 1>that you could potentially draft in showing the depth of

0:14:23.440 --> 0:14:27.040
<v Speaker 1>that position. Is there anybody that you're looking at in

0:14:27.120 --> 0:14:30.480
<v Speaker 1>terms of a guy maybe early Day three, even late

0:14:30.560 --> 0:14:32.840
<v Speaker 1>day two that you could go for safety if you

0:14:32.880 --> 0:14:35.000
<v Speaker 1>wanted to draft at Kin Law or a receiver in

0:14:35.000 --> 0:14:37.560
<v Speaker 1>the first round. We've got a limited amount of film

0:14:37.560 --> 0:14:39.160
<v Speaker 1>on this guy. But he was at the Senior Bowl.

0:14:39.280 --> 0:14:41.920
<v Speaker 1>Jeremy Chen's interesting. Now. I know it's a small school

0:14:41.920 --> 0:14:44.240
<v Speaker 1>in southern Illinois, but if you're looking for a strong

0:14:44.280 --> 0:14:47.320
<v Speaker 1>safety and that's what that's what he is, don't ask

0:14:47.400 --> 0:14:49.400
<v Speaker 1>him to cover a lot. He did hold his own

0:14:49.440 --> 0:14:51.760
<v Speaker 1>at the Senior Bowl. That's probably fine because the Xavier

0:14:51.800 --> 0:14:54.840
<v Speaker 1>Woods can play free. I mean, yeah, I wouldn't, especially

0:14:54.960 --> 0:14:56.920
<v Speaker 1>you're not talking about drafting a strong safety in the

0:14:56.960 --> 0:14:59.760
<v Speaker 1>first round. We're also to free. Chin is taking a

0:15:00.160 --> 0:15:04.360
<v Speaker 1>swing on nothing but ability, where you're like, well, he's

0:15:04.480 --> 0:15:07.720
<v Speaker 1>got talent, but I don't trust him in coverage. I

0:15:07.720 --> 0:15:09.840
<v Speaker 1>don't trust that he sees things quickly. I don't like,

0:15:09.840 --> 0:15:12.720
<v Speaker 1>I don't trust anything other than the fact that he's

0:15:12.720 --> 0:15:14.440
<v Speaker 1>got good size. He's really good at I'm gonna say

0:15:14.480 --> 0:15:17.640
<v Speaker 1>he's every bit of six three two fifteen. So it

0:15:17.720 --> 0:15:20.600
<v Speaker 1>definitely stands out when you watch him play. What's he

0:15:20.640 --> 0:15:22.200
<v Speaker 1>gonna run at the combine? And I think this is

0:15:22.240 --> 0:15:24.960
<v Speaker 1>one that actually will matter. I know he sometimes he

0:15:25.160 --> 0:15:27.040
<v Speaker 1>put a lot of stuck into forties on wide receivers

0:15:27.040 --> 0:15:29.240
<v Speaker 1>and things like that. At safety, maybe you're not looking

0:15:29.240 --> 0:15:31.080
<v Speaker 1>at it too much, but I do think it's important

0:15:31.080 --> 0:15:32.720
<v Speaker 1>to see what he runs. My time that I have

0:15:32.800 --> 0:15:36.600
<v Speaker 1>on him now it was a four to six seven. Well, silly,

0:15:36.840 --> 0:15:39.800
<v Speaker 1>it's you can run. And he played free, you know

0:15:39.880 --> 0:15:42.360
<v Speaker 1>on tape, so like he played free and he was

0:15:42.400 --> 0:15:45.040
<v Speaker 1>a good open field tackler. You can see how big

0:15:45.080 --> 0:15:46.640
<v Speaker 1>he is though, and that's where you just kind of go, Okay,

0:15:46.680 --> 0:15:49.520
<v Speaker 1>there's my strong safety. Fifth round. Cowboys have two picks

0:15:49.520 --> 0:15:51.800
<v Speaker 1>in the fifth round. If you know how Papa safety

0:15:52.080 --> 0:15:53.640
<v Speaker 1>late and you think he can come in and play,

0:15:53.680 --> 0:15:56.080
<v Speaker 1>you're probably bringing Jeff Heath back too. And I know

0:15:56.080 --> 0:15:57.480
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people's eyes are gonna roll in the

0:15:57.520 --> 0:15:59.840
<v Speaker 1>back of their head, but that's a chance that happens.

0:16:00.200 --> 0:16:02.920
<v Speaker 1>I know I would straight up do it. It's it's

0:16:02.960 --> 0:16:05.280
<v Speaker 1>interesting because we don't know what this coaching staff is

0:16:05.320 --> 0:16:07.960
<v Speaker 1>gonna want. I mean, all the people that valued Jeff

0:16:08.000 --> 0:16:10.720
<v Speaker 1>Heath have moved on for the most part, but I do.

0:16:10.960 --> 0:16:13.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean, they will need to bring a capable safety

0:16:13.800 --> 0:16:17.320
<v Speaker 1>and free agency just for numbers, Jeff Heath makes sense,

0:16:17.720 --> 0:16:21.320
<v Speaker 1>but we'll see. Darian Thompson, what about corner? That's im

0:16:21.400 --> 0:16:23.000
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to bring that up next because I mean,

0:16:23.200 --> 0:16:27.160
<v Speaker 1>we're originally talking about deep positions. I'm thrilled by this

0:16:27.200 --> 0:16:28.880
<v Speaker 1>because I mean much like, I don't know if they

0:16:28.960 --> 0:16:31.040
<v Speaker 1>do it rounds two three like they did in twenty

0:16:31.080 --> 0:16:34.280
<v Speaker 1>seventeen with Cheeto and Jordan Lewis, But you have to

0:16:34.320 --> 0:16:36.920
<v Speaker 1>replace every corner over the next twelve months. That's what

0:16:36.920 --> 0:16:39.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm saying. This seems like a draft. This seems like

0:16:39.760 --> 0:16:41.560
<v Speaker 1>a draft where you would want to double up on

0:16:41.600 --> 0:16:45.960
<v Speaker 1>the position, and there's awesome opportunity to do that here. Okay,

0:16:46.000 --> 0:16:49.440
<v Speaker 1>they're not going to touch Jeff Okuda, obviously, but every

0:16:49.440 --> 0:16:52.400
<v Speaker 1>other cornerback, like at the top of the heap makes

0:16:52.440 --> 0:16:56.120
<v Speaker 1>sense for their range, does he not? Christian Fulton, C. J. Henderson,

0:16:56.160 --> 0:16:59.240
<v Speaker 1>Trevon Diggs. I think I would even throw Bryce Hall

0:16:59.280 --> 0:17:02.960
<v Speaker 1>in there. Bryce Hall too, I want him in this week. Okay,

0:17:03.640 --> 0:17:06.560
<v Speaker 1>what we're talking about, No, no, we're talking about early

0:17:06.680 --> 0:17:10.320
<v Speaker 1>day three guys. No, no, no no, no, first round. I'm

0:17:10.359 --> 0:17:14.040
<v Speaker 1>talking Okay, maybe not pick seventeen, but again, like you're

0:17:14.040 --> 0:17:16.080
<v Speaker 1>talking about trading back and drafting a safety like and

0:17:16.359 --> 0:17:19.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, I would imagine Bryce Hall could go in

0:17:19.560 --> 0:17:22.080
<v Speaker 1>the twenties or as far back as forty. I think

0:17:22.119 --> 0:17:24.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it's crazy to think I have Bryce

0:17:24.119 --> 0:17:26.919
<v Speaker 1>Hall of Virginia. By the way, I've got him in

0:17:27.000 --> 0:17:29.840
<v Speaker 1>my fourth round stack. I love not nuts about him.

0:17:29.840 --> 0:17:32.320
<v Speaker 1>But it's fine. If we all agreed on everything, we

0:17:32.400 --> 0:17:35.040
<v Speaker 1>would be crazy people. That's fine. I found a sleeper

0:17:35.280 --> 0:17:37.800
<v Speaker 1>last week. Jeff's sleeper that you kind of came up

0:17:37.840 --> 0:17:44.600
<v Speaker 1>with was the Auburn guy. Noah his names, No, I

0:17:44.680 --> 0:17:47.640
<v Speaker 1>used to have it. He got it, well, I got

0:17:48.960 --> 0:17:51.159
<v Speaker 1>I got another sleeper, and I need I'm gonna need

0:17:51.240 --> 0:17:53.200
<v Speaker 1>more tape on him because I just have a Memphis

0:17:53.240 --> 0:17:55.720
<v Speaker 1>game and what's the other game. Found a guy in

0:17:55.760 --> 0:17:57.520
<v Speaker 1>Division three No no, no, no no, no no, it's not

0:17:57.600 --> 0:18:00.760
<v Speaker 1>Division three s the emissunt. They found a guy in

0:18:00.760 --> 0:18:02.879
<v Speaker 1>the German League. No no no, no, oh, I still got him.

0:18:02.920 --> 0:18:05.760
<v Speaker 1>Gets Oklahoma State where he's shut down Tayland Wallace, so

0:18:05.840 --> 0:18:07.840
<v Speaker 1>get some of that, and also a Michigan State. You're

0:18:07.880 --> 0:18:09.760
<v Speaker 1>Tulsa guy, but I need more. It's my Tulsa gut

0:18:09.800 --> 0:18:13.480
<v Speaker 1>Reggie Robinson. So earlier in the previous episodes of the

0:18:13.520 --> 0:18:15.360
<v Speaker 1>Draft show, I told you my Manamy, I'm Pat Kat

0:18:15.480 --> 0:18:18.560
<v Speaker 1>was a meek Robertson who had fourteen interceptions in three years,

0:18:18.600 --> 0:18:21.120
<v Speaker 1>said Louisiana Tech, but his hip destroyed. I mean he's

0:18:21.119 --> 0:18:24.399
<v Speaker 1>getting nursing home hip. That's not so. Reggie Robinson of

0:18:24.440 --> 0:18:27.280
<v Speaker 1>Tulsa is my new guy six one two O two.

0:18:27.680 --> 0:18:30.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm just imagining like next Senior Bowl guy too. Yes, sir,

0:18:30.960 --> 0:18:33.000
<v Speaker 1>next week you're gonna sit down and be like, I

0:18:33.080 --> 0:18:35.800
<v Speaker 1>don't like Reggie Robinson. No, no, no no. If I

0:18:35.840 --> 0:18:38.119
<v Speaker 1>find out he's got nursing home hip, then yes, but

0:18:38.320 --> 0:18:40.719
<v Speaker 1>I mean I'll be out on him. Okay, forget forget

0:18:40.760 --> 0:18:43.040
<v Speaker 1>the disagreement of opinion about Bryce Hall. But it's some

0:18:43.160 --> 0:18:46.160
<v Speaker 1>Danceler in your life. He got Cameron Danceler, you got

0:18:46.280 --> 0:18:49.320
<v Speaker 1>NOI an agony. Let's go. We were impressed by Darnay

0:18:49.359 --> 0:18:51.600
<v Speaker 1>Holmes and Dane Jackson at the Senior Bowl. Those are

0:18:51.720 --> 0:18:54.400
<v Speaker 1>more Day three type of guys, but a fifth round

0:18:54.440 --> 0:18:57.880
<v Speaker 1>guy from me. But those guys, I like the odds

0:18:57.920 --> 0:18:59.720
<v Speaker 1>that you can find it. I mean, if you wanted

0:18:59.720 --> 0:19:01.639
<v Speaker 1>to drive after the top, you could, and then you

0:19:01.680 --> 0:19:04.520
<v Speaker 1>could still come back on day three and find a

0:19:04.520 --> 0:19:07.520
<v Speaker 1>pretty good corner. You move back, you take CJ. Henderson

0:19:07.520 --> 0:19:10.639
<v Speaker 1>in the first round, you wait to fifty one, you

0:19:10.760 --> 0:19:13.600
<v Speaker 1>take Cameron Danceler in the second round, and then you

0:19:13.680 --> 0:19:16.719
<v Speaker 1>also have picked up another pick. We'll find our wide receiver,

0:19:17.000 --> 0:19:19.840
<v Speaker 1>and we'll find our d tackle there somewhere in the third.

0:19:19.840 --> 0:19:23.960
<v Speaker 1>It'll be great. They're gonna sign now, I just drafted Henderson.

0:19:24.400 --> 0:19:29.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm worried abouts They're all just going to be there

0:19:29.640 --> 0:19:32.320
<v Speaker 1>for you, justin Matta Bike. They're all just going to

0:19:32.359 --> 0:19:34.399
<v Speaker 1>be fourth and two picks in the fifth where I

0:19:34.440 --> 0:19:36.600
<v Speaker 1>think wide receivers that's I think that could be a

0:19:36.640 --> 0:19:41.960
<v Speaker 1>good zone for that. I'm nervous. I'm so nervous about

0:19:41.960 --> 0:19:44.359
<v Speaker 1>waiting to the third round to address the defensive line.

0:19:44.800 --> 0:19:47.720
<v Speaker 1>That's a little risky. You just needed to stretch for us.

0:19:47.880 --> 0:19:49.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't think is going to be there in the third.

0:19:49.840 --> 0:19:52.520
<v Speaker 1>But well, we'll talk about that. I am a later point.

0:19:52.560 --> 0:19:55.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm slowly developing the opinion that they are going to

0:19:55.840 --> 0:19:58.359
<v Speaker 1>do work on the D line in free agency that

0:19:58.400 --> 0:20:02.040
<v Speaker 1>will mitigate some of these concerns. Mike Daniels in here something, Yeah,

0:20:02.080 --> 0:20:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Chris Jones, let's just sign him. Daniels will give you

0:20:04.080 --> 0:20:07.159
<v Speaker 1>a good six games. Go go look at the available

0:20:07.400 --> 0:20:11.040
<v Speaker 1>defensive tackles. Oh, there's twenty of them, That's what I'm saying.

0:20:11.600 --> 0:20:13.439
<v Speaker 1>And I think that I don't think they have a

0:20:13.520 --> 0:20:17.320
<v Speaker 1>choice but to sign some because they've got nobody but

0:20:18.119 --> 0:20:20.920
<v Speaker 1>Tyrone Crawford, who hasn't played the position in two years

0:20:20.920 --> 0:20:24.480
<v Speaker 1>and has bad hips woods he's not on the exclusive rights.

0:20:24.480 --> 0:20:26.600
<v Speaker 1>I think that doesn't I mean again, going back to

0:20:26.640 --> 0:20:29.239
<v Speaker 1>that point, like does this coaching staff want him? Does

0:20:29.280 --> 0:20:31.360
<v Speaker 1>he fit what they want to do? Hi? Bro oh

0:20:31.440 --> 0:20:33.840
<v Speaker 1>cool Tristan Hill who couldn't get a jersey in two

0:20:33.880 --> 0:20:37.960
<v Speaker 1>thirds of their games. The point being they need help

0:20:38.040 --> 0:20:39.800
<v Speaker 1>in a way that they can't afford to wait to

0:20:39.840 --> 0:20:43.000
<v Speaker 1>the draft. So I'm very I'm very curious to see

0:20:43.040 --> 0:20:44.800
<v Speaker 1>what they do that well, we can't afford to wait

0:20:44.840 --> 0:20:47.720
<v Speaker 1>any longer to take our first break. Now, last week, Dave,

0:20:47.800 --> 0:20:51.560
<v Speaker 1>you talked about Jalen Hurts not having a long NFL career.

0:20:51.640 --> 0:20:54.240
<v Speaker 1>That's gonna be our first twitter on the twenty question

0:20:54.400 --> 0:20:57.320
<v Speaker 1>nice when we return. We're gonna address that when we

0:20:57.440 --> 0:21:00.520
<v Speaker 1>come back. This is a Dallas Cowboys dot Com Draft show.

0:21:10.640 --> 0:21:13.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm Jay Novachik, former tight end for the Dallas Cowboys.

0:21:14.119 --> 0:21:16.080
<v Speaker 1>Back in the day, I was the guy who always

0:21:16.119 --> 0:21:18.639
<v Speaker 1>got the tough yards and that's why I run with

0:21:18.720 --> 0:21:21.320
<v Speaker 1>John Deer today. In fact, I have a John Deer

0:21:21.440 --> 0:21:24.320
<v Speaker 1>three zero twenty five E tractor that can handle any

0:21:24.400 --> 0:21:26.959
<v Speaker 1>yard work I need to do, even the tough yards

0:21:27.000 --> 0:21:29.520
<v Speaker 1>way out back. So if you have one acre or

0:21:29.560 --> 0:21:32.360
<v Speaker 1>a thousand, John Deer has the equipment that's just right

0:21:32.440 --> 0:21:35.280
<v Speaker 1>for you. Visit a John Deer dealer today and run

0:21:35.359 --> 0:21:38.360
<v Speaker 1>with us. We are the official tractor provider of your

0:21:38.440 --> 0:21:42.560
<v Speaker 1>Dallas Cowboys. SLORA is a proud sponsor of the Dallas Cowboys,

0:21:42.720 --> 0:21:45.440
<v Speaker 1>helping fans see more and do more with our best

0:21:45.520 --> 0:21:49.360
<v Speaker 1>vision solutions. Our lens technologies reveal a world more beautiful

0:21:49.359 --> 0:21:51.720
<v Speaker 1>than you can imagine. For a limited time, get the

0:21:51.920 --> 0:21:54.760
<v Speaker 1>Slur next Gen Offer, where you buy the latest generation

0:21:54.800 --> 0:21:57.960
<v Speaker 1>of Transitions lenses with select Slur lenses, you can choose

0:21:57.960 --> 0:22:00.800
<v Speaker 1>a second pair of clear lenses for free. Qualifying frame

0:22:00.880 --> 0:22:05.159
<v Speaker 1>purchases restrictions apply. Find a participating eyecare professional by visiting

0:22:05.320 --> 0:22:10.000
<v Speaker 1>slor usa dot com. See more. Do more want to

0:22:10.080 --> 0:22:12.840
<v Speaker 1>use what the pros use? How about the official men's

0:22:12.840 --> 0:22:16.480
<v Speaker 1>skincare brand of the Dallas Cowboys, Jack Black. Right now

0:22:16.520 --> 0:22:19.199
<v Speaker 1>you can get the Jack Black Starter, a curated collection

0:22:19.200 --> 0:22:21.720
<v Speaker 1>of Cowboys locker room favorites, for just ten bucks with

0:22:21.880 --> 0:22:25.640
<v Speaker 1>free shipping. The Starter includes four Jack Black skincare favorites

0:22:25.720 --> 0:22:28.600
<v Speaker 1>plus a full size and tense therapy whip bomb. Go

0:22:28.680 --> 0:22:31.359
<v Speaker 1>to get Jack Black dot com slash Cowboys and use

0:22:31.400 --> 0:22:34.640
<v Speaker 1>the code word Team JB. That's Get Jack Black dot

0:22:34.680 --> 0:22:38.719
<v Speaker 1>com slash Cowboys, the Jack Black starter, ten bucks free

0:22:38.720 --> 0:22:43.840
<v Speaker 1>shipping your new apartments big Such a great deal. That's okay,

0:22:44.200 --> 0:22:51.119
<v Speaker 1>just okay? What's not right above the subway? Well, I

0:22:51.200 --> 0:22:54.960
<v Speaker 1>bet you don't even notice it after that's my neighbor,

0:22:55.720 --> 0:22:58.920
<v Speaker 1>Ain't it the deal? That's just okay, It's not okay,

0:22:59.200 --> 0:23:01.959
<v Speaker 1>get a great deal America's best network. Come into an

0:23:01.960 --> 0:23:03.479
<v Speaker 1>AT and T store to find out how to get

0:23:03.520 --> 0:23:06.359
<v Speaker 1>one of our popular smartphones for zero dollars down based

0:23:06.400 --> 0:23:10.680
<v Speaker 1>on GWS one course. September twenty nineteen. This is the

0:23:10.800 --> 0:23:16.600
<v Speaker 1>Dallas Cowboys dot Com Draft Show. Back here from the

0:23:16.720 --> 0:23:20.760
<v Speaker 1>SWBC Mortgage studios at the Star in Frisco, Episode five

0:23:20.920 --> 0:23:23.840
<v Speaker 1>of the twenty twenty season of the Draft Show. Just

0:23:23.960 --> 0:23:27.399
<v Speaker 1>carrying on the legacy left behind by guys like Brian

0:23:27.440 --> 0:23:30.960
<v Speaker 1>brought Us and Dame Brugler, investigating and educating. That's the

0:23:30.960 --> 0:23:33.480
<v Speaker 1>first time I've said that you five weeks, so I

0:23:33.480 --> 0:23:37.360
<v Speaker 1>feel like we should probably hit is it? Brian might

0:23:37.440 --> 0:23:40.640
<v Speaker 1>have rights on that, you might have the building, could

0:23:40.680 --> 0:23:43.720
<v Speaker 1>probably own it. So that's a good point. That is

0:23:43.760 --> 0:23:46.959
<v Speaker 1>a good point. But we love those guys, and just

0:23:47.040 --> 0:23:50.360
<v Speaker 1>trying to talk some draft here, of course, and man,

0:23:50.400 --> 0:23:54.120
<v Speaker 1>we've got a great couple of questions to hit here

0:23:54.119 --> 0:23:56.280
<v Speaker 1>in the coming moments. And this first one kind of

0:23:56.320 --> 0:23:59.800
<v Speaker 1>caught me off guard because it's directly challenging a statement

0:23:59.800 --> 0:24:02.480
<v Speaker 1>may by the great Dave Hellman oh Boy last week,

0:24:02.520 --> 0:24:05.399
<v Speaker 1>oh go after oh Boy, no award on Twitter, our

0:24:05.440 --> 0:24:10.919
<v Speaker 1>first Twitter on the twenty. He says, just listen to

0:24:11.119 --> 0:24:13.720
<v Speaker 1>the latest Draft show, and you said you didn't see

0:24:13.800 --> 0:24:17.520
<v Speaker 1>Jalen Hurts having a long NFL career. Dave, can you

0:24:18.040 --> 0:24:22.680
<v Speaker 1>expand on that? Actually, okay, let me rephrase. Jalen Hurts

0:24:22.680 --> 0:24:26.520
<v Speaker 1>could have a long NFL career because he's capable of

0:24:27.040 --> 0:24:30.080
<v Speaker 1>being on an NFL roster and he definitely can contribute something.

0:24:30.160 --> 0:24:33.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't see him being like a multi year starter

0:24:33.920 --> 0:24:37.280
<v Speaker 1>at the NFL level, like being the face of a franchise.

0:24:37.280 --> 0:24:38.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't like him, I alone in that. Do you

0:24:38.840 --> 0:24:41.920
<v Speaker 1>all think I'm crazy? I don't think he's an NFL starter.

0:24:42.160 --> 0:24:45.280
<v Speaker 1>That's that's my point. I mean, shoot, we spent five

0:24:45.320 --> 0:24:48.199
<v Speaker 1>minutes talking about Taysom Hill in the first segment. I mean,

0:24:48.240 --> 0:24:50.919
<v Speaker 1>if Taysom Hill can turn in, I mean, how long

0:24:50.920 --> 0:24:52.800
<v Speaker 1>has he been in the league. Taysom Hill can start.

0:24:52.920 --> 0:24:56.480
<v Speaker 1>Jalen Hurts might be able to start. Taysom Hill doesn't

0:24:56.480 --> 0:24:59.280
<v Speaker 1>start that, okay. I was like in my trying to

0:24:59.280 --> 0:25:01.760
<v Speaker 1>get him Twitter in a year, I'm trying to pump

0:25:01.880 --> 0:25:04.639
<v Speaker 1>him excite. It's going to beg of the Los Angeles Charger.

0:25:04.760 --> 0:25:07.160
<v Speaker 1>I think I think Jalen Hurtzel get drafted. I think

0:25:07.240 --> 0:25:09.399
<v Speaker 1>he's he's more talented than people give him credit for.

0:25:09.520 --> 0:25:13.040
<v Speaker 1>He's got a hell of an arm um and and

0:25:13.080 --> 0:25:15.879
<v Speaker 1>he's his athleticism helps him make plays Like I have

0:25:16.000 --> 0:25:19.800
<v Speaker 1>never been impressed by what he does. When a defense

0:25:19.880 --> 0:25:22.200
<v Speaker 1>like completely hymns him in and doesn't let him use

0:25:22.200 --> 0:25:24.879
<v Speaker 1>that athleticism to win. I mean, like, you know, maybe

0:25:24.880 --> 0:25:29.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm biased, but LSU really hindered his ability when they

0:25:29.160 --> 0:25:31.120
<v Speaker 1>got after him and forced him to play a little

0:25:31.119 --> 0:25:34.320
<v Speaker 1>bit more traditionally. Um, that doesn't mean he can't be

0:25:34.400 --> 0:25:36.800
<v Speaker 1>useful in the NFL. Shoot if he wound up with

0:25:36.800 --> 0:25:39.639
<v Speaker 1>like a Sean Payton and they could use subpackages for

0:25:39.720 --> 0:25:41.760
<v Speaker 1>him and let him use his athleticism and things like that.

0:25:42.040 --> 0:25:44.360
<v Speaker 1>He could be very successful. I just don't see him

0:25:44.440 --> 0:25:47.600
<v Speaker 1>starting for an NFL team for multiple years. And that's

0:25:47.640 --> 0:25:48.679
<v Speaker 1>kind of what I was going to say. Is he

0:25:48.720 --> 0:25:50.640
<v Speaker 1>more of a project? Is that probably the best way

0:25:50.680 --> 0:25:53.200
<v Speaker 1>to put it in terms of a guy you can

0:25:53.240 --> 0:25:57.560
<v Speaker 1>put behind a veteran and let him learn for multitude

0:25:57.600 --> 0:25:59.960
<v Speaker 1>of years with a good coaching staff, and then maybe

0:26:00.040 --> 0:26:02.080
<v Speaker 1>he turns into a successful quarterback. You can make him

0:26:02.119 --> 0:26:05.120
<v Speaker 1>the backup in Baltimore. Yeah, I mean, because I don't

0:26:05.200 --> 0:26:07.960
<v Speaker 1>think you would. He's already taken that right. Yeah, you

0:26:08.000 --> 0:26:09.920
<v Speaker 1>could do better than that, but I don't. I don't

0:26:10.000 --> 0:26:12.440
<v Speaker 1>think that you're going to just have Jalen Hurts be

0:26:12.560 --> 0:26:17.160
<v Speaker 1>the backup to fill in the blank generic quarterback and

0:26:17.280 --> 0:26:20.919
<v Speaker 1>run the same thing, because like they had to change Oklahoma,

0:26:21.000 --> 0:26:22.760
<v Speaker 1>We've I think we pictured it as all being the

0:26:22.800 --> 0:26:24.919
<v Speaker 1>same with Baker and Kyler and Jalen, but they were

0:26:24.920 --> 0:26:27.800
<v Speaker 1>all three different offenses. Yeah. The Jalen Hurts offense offered

0:26:27.800 --> 0:26:30.040
<v Speaker 1>a lot of It was a lot of quarterback power

0:26:30.160 --> 0:26:32.320
<v Speaker 1>really yeah, where it's like, hey, our running back's gonna

0:26:32.359 --> 0:26:34.880
<v Speaker 1>lead block for you. And that's because he's not the

0:26:35.000 --> 0:26:40.560
<v Speaker 1>athlete that Lamar is, right, he's not. I don't think

0:26:40.600 --> 0:26:42.639
<v Speaker 1>he's a good enough thrower to win in the NFL

0:26:42.800 --> 0:26:46.000
<v Speaker 1>that way. And I don't think he processes what's happening

0:26:46.040 --> 0:26:48.760
<v Speaker 1>fast enough to win from the pocket. That's the issue.

0:26:48.800 --> 0:26:51.600
<v Speaker 1>And how fast, how how much development does it take

0:26:51.640 --> 0:26:53.720
<v Speaker 1>to get a guy to process things down the field,

0:26:54.280 --> 0:26:57.040
<v Speaker 1>Like almost everyone's a project if you're a quarterback. But

0:26:57.080 --> 0:26:59.919
<v Speaker 1>the fact that Cody Kessler's on an NFL roster tells

0:26:59.920 --> 0:27:02.080
<v Speaker 1>you that Jalen Hurts could be on an NFL Yeah, No,

0:27:02.160 --> 0:27:03.720
<v Speaker 1>I just don't see him as a starter. I think

0:27:03.760 --> 0:27:07.280
<v Speaker 1>he and like I hate people that just dismiss a

0:27:07.280 --> 0:27:09.960
<v Speaker 1>guy off and like you can never measure like somebody's

0:27:09.960 --> 0:27:12.239
<v Speaker 1>will and the way they develop or what system they

0:27:12.280 --> 0:27:14.720
<v Speaker 1>wind up in. Would Taysom he'll ever have had the

0:27:14.720 --> 0:27:16.600
<v Speaker 1>career he did if he didn't wind up with with

0:27:16.640 --> 0:27:18.920
<v Speaker 1>such a good and creative coach. So I don't want

0:27:18.920 --> 0:27:22.240
<v Speaker 1>to completely write him off. And if Tyrod Taylor can

0:27:22.280 --> 0:27:26.160
<v Speaker 1>have the career he had, which included multiple quality years

0:27:26.160 --> 0:27:29.119
<v Speaker 1>as a starter, starting caliber contracts at the time to

0:27:29.119 --> 0:27:31.040
<v Speaker 1>go start for a team, Jay, we didn't think Dak

0:27:31.040 --> 0:27:34.199
<v Speaker 1>would be a starter. Sure, j Jalen Hurts could do it.

0:27:34.280 --> 0:27:38.000
<v Speaker 1>I just I do not envision him having like a

0:27:38.160 --> 0:27:40.960
<v Speaker 1>multiple year career as a starter. I think he's a

0:27:41.160 --> 0:27:46.280
<v Speaker 1>He's a backup slash gadget guy slash developmental dude. Processing

0:27:46.280 --> 0:27:48.359
<v Speaker 1>down the field was a question for Dak coming out.

0:27:48.520 --> 0:27:50.520
<v Speaker 1>I think that's the best. Yeah, Like, I mean, it's

0:27:50.520 --> 0:27:53.160
<v Speaker 1>not a comparison or anything, but like maybe that's kind

0:27:53.160 --> 0:27:54.920
<v Speaker 1>of the area in the draft I think Jalen Hurts

0:27:54.960 --> 0:27:57.720
<v Speaker 1>would go. I assume have either of you. I assume

0:27:57.800 --> 0:28:02.680
<v Speaker 1>y'all haven't dive diven dive dove dove on quarterbacks. I

0:28:02.760 --> 0:28:05.720
<v Speaker 1>have not. I know the Cowboys are not going to

0:28:05.800 --> 0:28:08.240
<v Speaker 1>need one in the top of the draft. Watched one yet.

0:28:08.280 --> 0:28:10.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean I've watched a lot of them, and I've

0:28:10.440 --> 0:28:13.959
<v Speaker 1>I've watched enough study I've between Bama and Oklahoma. I've

0:28:14.000 --> 0:28:16.199
<v Speaker 1>watched enough of Jalen Hurts to have I think I

0:28:16.240 --> 0:28:18.159
<v Speaker 1>have a feel for him and didn't grasp on it.

0:28:18.320 --> 0:28:20.199
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I would still guess he gets drafted in

0:28:20.240 --> 0:28:22.720
<v Speaker 1>the by the fourth round. I will bet he gets

0:28:22.720 --> 0:28:24.600
<v Speaker 1>picked in the third or fourth round. Yeah, that's where

0:28:24.600 --> 0:28:27.960
<v Speaker 1>I bet he goes. Next question comes from Daniel Buchanan,

0:28:28.040 --> 0:28:31.200
<v Speaker 1>and Buchanan asks he says who has a better chance

0:28:31.240 --> 0:28:34.560
<v Speaker 1>to be there in the second round for Dallas? Is

0:28:34.560 --> 0:28:38.560
<v Speaker 1>it Chason or Queen? Oh, pass rushers go quick. Chason

0:28:38.760 --> 0:28:42.360
<v Speaker 1>is not a any means, but Caleb and Chason. I

0:28:42.400 --> 0:28:44.520
<v Speaker 1>could totally see him going in the first round. I

0:28:44.600 --> 0:28:46.520
<v Speaker 1>think I could see Queen going in the first round too.

0:28:46.760 --> 0:28:49.000
<v Speaker 1>If you're betting which one might make it, there's a

0:28:49.040 --> 0:28:51.520
<v Speaker 1>one percent chance Queen makes it and a less than

0:28:51.560 --> 0:28:55.080
<v Speaker 1>that percent chance Chason makes. Queen is insane to me

0:28:55.280 --> 0:28:58.240
<v Speaker 1>as an truck as as an LSU fan, like I

0:28:58.280 --> 0:29:00.880
<v Speaker 1>didn't pick this question out, but he was awesome. Don't

0:29:00.880 --> 0:29:03.240
<v Speaker 1>get me wrong, He's very good. He covers incredibly well.

0:29:03.440 --> 0:29:05.920
<v Speaker 1>Hell of a player. But I was thinking he was

0:29:05.960 --> 0:29:08.520
<v Speaker 1>sort of like an under the radar pet cat, Like,

0:29:08.960 --> 0:29:11.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, I don't think so people found well. When

0:29:11.680 --> 0:29:14.080
<v Speaker 1>I say under the radar, I mean, you know, top

0:29:14.120 --> 0:29:17.200
<v Speaker 1>sixty pick, top eighty pick. Until he declared I didn't

0:29:17.200 --> 0:29:18.800
<v Speaker 1>know very much at all, and then I saw other

0:29:18.840 --> 0:29:20.760
<v Speaker 1>guys watching him, like, oh my gosh, he's really good.

0:29:20.840 --> 0:29:24.240
<v Speaker 1>Daniel Jeremiah didn't know two days after the National title game,

0:29:24.320 --> 0:29:26.440
<v Speaker 1>Daniel Jeremiah is like, this guy's a top twenty pick,

0:29:26.680 --> 0:29:28.880
<v Speaker 1>Like oh, I did not see that coming. Yeah, but

0:29:28.960 --> 0:29:31.440
<v Speaker 1>Chason's a bendy pass right, No, no, no no, let's go quick.

0:29:31.520 --> 0:29:34.360
<v Speaker 1>Chason's a first round pick as far as I position

0:29:34.440 --> 0:29:36.160
<v Speaker 1>value will matter there and that type of thing. But

0:29:36.200 --> 0:29:38.360
<v Speaker 1>that is a fun type of you know, prop bet

0:29:38.400 --> 0:29:39.840
<v Speaker 1>at some point if you want to get into it

0:29:40.040 --> 0:29:43.640
<v Speaker 1>or I mean, I think Chason goes first. But man,

0:29:44.120 --> 0:29:46.400
<v Speaker 1>if you're a team who needs an inside linebacker, you know,

0:29:46.400 --> 0:29:48.760
<v Speaker 1>if you're going to play Patrick Queen versus Kenneth Murray,

0:29:48.800 --> 0:29:51.440
<v Speaker 1>I think they'll take Queen over Murray. I think they're close.

0:29:51.640 --> 0:29:53.840
<v Speaker 1>I think Queen a little bit more. He I like

0:29:53.880 --> 0:29:56.080
<v Speaker 1>how he scrapes through and finds his way to the

0:29:56.080 --> 0:29:59.400
<v Speaker 1>football am and he sees it pretty quickly too, I

0:29:59.480 --> 0:30:02.200
<v Speaker 1>think for I, you know, who didn't have like four

0:30:02.240 --> 0:30:04.760
<v Speaker 1>years of starting experience or anything. I think his instincts

0:30:04.800 --> 0:30:07.040
<v Speaker 1>are pretty quick. I think there's I think there's a

0:30:07.120 --> 0:30:10.920
<v Speaker 1>chance they both go in the first round. Um, Queen

0:30:11.120 --> 0:30:12.960
<v Speaker 1>is the better bet to fall to the second. But

0:30:13.000 --> 0:30:15.800
<v Speaker 1>even then, I don't think he'd be there at fifty one. Yeah.

0:30:15.840 --> 0:30:17.440
<v Speaker 1>I don't think he's gonna be there fifty one either.

0:30:17.480 --> 0:30:19.760
<v Speaker 1>But it's interesting for the sake of Chason where you're

0:30:19.760 --> 0:30:23.160
<v Speaker 1>talking about him. If Chason went at fifteen or if

0:30:23.240 --> 0:30:25.880
<v Speaker 1>Chason went at thirty five, I don't think I would

0:30:25.920 --> 0:30:28.320
<v Speaker 1>be surprised. It's not it's way different. I'm not comparing

0:30:28.320 --> 0:30:29.880
<v Speaker 1>the two players, but it kind of reminds me of

0:30:29.880 --> 0:30:32.200
<v Speaker 1>Harold Landry from a few years ago. Okay, when you're

0:30:32.240 --> 0:30:35.160
<v Speaker 1>sitting there going, okay, could he go late teens and

0:30:35.240 --> 0:30:38.120
<v Speaker 1>he ends up you know, thirty six or wherever he

0:30:38.160 --> 0:30:40.240
<v Speaker 1>went to Tennessee in the second round. Well, I don't

0:30:40.240 --> 0:30:44.560
<v Speaker 1>think this is a good edge class. Chase Young is incredible,

0:30:44.880 --> 0:30:46.959
<v Speaker 1>and after that, Chason could be the next one to go.

0:30:47.320 --> 0:30:50.640
<v Speaker 1>Aj Epenesa I think has probably mocked the highest after that,

0:30:50.800 --> 0:30:52.360
<v Speaker 1>but I think people are also going to see him

0:30:52.360 --> 0:30:54.560
<v Speaker 1>and go, okay, the two hundred and eighty pounder run stopper.

0:30:54.600 --> 0:30:56.480
<v Speaker 1>He had college production as a pass rusher, but what

0:30:56.560 --> 0:30:58.920
<v Speaker 1>do I project that to the league? Whereas Chason's the

0:30:58.920 --> 0:31:02.600
<v Speaker 1>exact opposite. The production's not there, but I think the

0:31:02.720 --> 0:31:05.440
<v Speaker 1>twitched up athlete is there. I could see him being

0:31:05.440 --> 0:31:07.520
<v Speaker 1>the second edge off the board. I think that's the

0:31:07.560 --> 0:31:10.960
<v Speaker 1>classic case. If Dane Brugler was here, like high floor

0:31:11.120 --> 0:31:14.200
<v Speaker 1>verse or high ceiling verse low floor or high you

0:31:14.240 --> 0:31:15.960
<v Speaker 1>know what I mean? The high floor, Like, yeah, Epiness

0:31:16.040 --> 0:31:18.120
<v Speaker 1>is a high floor. Yeah that's a good player. Chase

0:31:18.240 --> 0:31:20.400
<v Speaker 1>ons a high ceiling where you might get fifteen sex

0:31:20.440 --> 0:31:23.320
<v Speaker 1>in a year. Sure, and you look at you kind

0:31:23.360 --> 0:31:25.960
<v Speaker 1>of mentioned the edge class in general. I mean, I

0:31:26.000 --> 0:31:31.760
<v Speaker 1>have I have Chasing in front of Epinezza and Grosmatos

0:31:31.800 --> 0:31:34.120
<v Speaker 1>out of Pinn State. I mean, Terrell Lewis is in

0:31:34.160 --> 0:31:36.240
<v Speaker 1>there as well. I mean that's just I feel like

0:31:36.280 --> 0:31:38.880
<v Speaker 1>they're just in a different class. Well, those three guys

0:31:38.920 --> 0:31:42.400
<v Speaker 1>up at the top, Chasing or Chason, excuse me, Epinessa,

0:31:42.400 --> 0:31:44.280
<v Speaker 1>and Young are just all by themselves. And I think

0:31:44.320 --> 0:31:47.120
<v Speaker 1>Young's even elevated above those guys too. All the more

0:31:47.240 --> 0:31:49.720
<v Speaker 1>reason why I think the Cowboys need to try really

0:31:49.720 --> 0:31:52.400
<v Speaker 1>hard to bring Robert quinnback, because I don't love their

0:31:52.400 --> 0:31:56.280
<v Speaker 1>odds of really addressing the edge in this draft. I mean,

0:31:56.680 --> 0:32:01.480
<v Speaker 1>who Dallas you got? Unless kind of third were you getting?

0:32:01.480 --> 0:32:03.920
<v Speaker 1>If you trade back, you're trading away from the good

0:32:04.000 --> 0:32:07.280
<v Speaker 1>edge players. You're trading back and taking Grossmatos and hoping

0:32:07.320 --> 0:32:10.479
<v Speaker 1>for the best. You said, Curtis Weaver or nothing third round? Yeah,

0:32:11.000 --> 0:32:12.840
<v Speaker 1>that shares the hell out of me. But Jeff said,

0:32:12.960 --> 0:32:15.360
<v Speaker 1>nothing feels like a sure thing, like like Chase Young.

0:32:15.560 --> 0:32:17.400
<v Speaker 1>But there are some guys there who I'm kind of

0:32:17.480 --> 0:32:20.080
<v Speaker 1>uncomfortable taking it there, and I'm more comfortable at a

0:32:20.160 --> 0:32:23.240
<v Speaker 1>value in telling I'm getting extra picks for I think

0:32:23.360 --> 0:32:26.120
<v Speaker 1>Terrell Lewis, of his medicals check out at the Combine,

0:32:26.240 --> 0:32:28.000
<v Speaker 1>I think you're going to see him get up into

0:32:28.000 --> 0:32:30.280
<v Speaker 1>the twenties. He had a nice week at the Senior

0:32:30.320 --> 0:32:33.520
<v Speaker 1>He's awesome on tape. Yeah, everyone's just worried about his

0:32:33.600 --> 0:32:36.040
<v Speaker 1>legs and they should be, Yeah, because he's he's got

0:32:36.080 --> 0:32:38.440
<v Speaker 1>a bad D. But if his medicals check out at

0:32:38.440 --> 0:32:40.760
<v Speaker 1>the combine, I think you're gonna go. Okay, there's a guy,

0:32:40.800 --> 0:32:42.440
<v Speaker 1>and I think he'll be talked about more than Chason

0:32:42.680 --> 0:32:45.040
<v Speaker 1>I do. All the Alabama players have all these medical

0:32:45.080 --> 0:32:51.480
<v Speaker 1>red flags. Don't worry about that grind back and forth. Okay,

0:32:51.480 --> 0:32:53.760
<v Speaker 1>So this one is Taylor made for Jeff cavan On,

0:32:53.880 --> 0:32:56.360
<v Speaker 1>no about it. I like it all right. I hate it.

0:32:56.480 --> 0:32:58.600
<v Speaker 1>Since it's nearly impossible to come out with four to

0:32:58.680 --> 0:33:01.360
<v Speaker 1>five impact rookie stars in one draft, wouldn't it be

0:33:01.360 --> 0:33:03.480
<v Speaker 1>better to draft a wide receiver high like Rugs or

0:33:03.520 --> 0:33:06.280
<v Speaker 1>rigor try to put up forty burgers on everyone rather

0:33:06.320 --> 0:33:09.080
<v Speaker 1>than focusing on defense and hoping that the rookies play

0:33:09.160 --> 0:33:11.360
<v Speaker 1>big in year one. Yeah, he's just been watching my YouTube.

0:33:11.440 --> 0:33:14.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah yeah, I feel like this is Is this a

0:33:14.240 --> 0:33:18.520
<v Speaker 1>burner account? Yeah, that's my burner account. Ragor is the

0:33:18.520 --> 0:33:20.320
<v Speaker 1>one guy that I don't think anybody's really talked about

0:33:20.360 --> 0:33:23.760
<v Speaker 1>the idea of at seventeen? Could you do it now?

0:33:23.760 --> 0:33:26.080
<v Speaker 1>In this case, we're assuming that free agency, you kind

0:33:26.080 --> 0:33:28.200
<v Speaker 1>of fill holes, you find a defensive end, you find

0:33:28.200 --> 0:33:31.720
<v Speaker 1>a d tackle. Yeah, you get to seventeen and Rugs

0:33:31.800 --> 0:33:36.360
<v Speaker 1>Judy Lamber gone, and could you take Jalen Ragor at seventeen?

0:33:37.840 --> 0:33:40.200
<v Speaker 1>I will say this, all right, I'll go, I'll go

0:33:40.240 --> 0:33:42.640
<v Speaker 1>this route. Is everybody's so sold on Rugs and nobody's

0:33:42.640 --> 0:33:45.440
<v Speaker 1>talking about Ragor on the same level. One of them

0:33:45.480 --> 0:33:48.760
<v Speaker 1>has had elite production as a nineteen year old in

0:33:48.760 --> 0:33:52.000
<v Speaker 1>college football, and one of them has never had great production. Yeah,

0:33:52.120 --> 0:33:55.600
<v Speaker 1>Rugs is faster. There's no doubt he can really make

0:33:55.600 --> 0:33:58.880
<v Speaker 1>people do circles coming off on scrimmage. But Ragor's a

0:33:58.880 --> 0:34:04.040
<v Speaker 1>monster too. I support the forty burger offense. I support it.

0:34:04.120 --> 0:34:06.120
<v Speaker 1>Make your strength so strong that you can cover up

0:34:06.160 --> 0:34:08.920
<v Speaker 1>your weakness. I haven't full disclosure. I haven't had a

0:34:08.920 --> 0:34:11.120
<v Speaker 1>good look at Ragor yet. I know who he is.

0:34:11.160 --> 0:34:13.320
<v Speaker 1>I know he's one of the fastest receivers in this class.

0:34:13.680 --> 0:34:18.919
<v Speaker 1>Sell me on him. But I think when you look

0:34:18.920 --> 0:34:23.359
<v Speaker 1>at him, he's not just fast, he's strong. They'll throw

0:34:23.400 --> 0:34:25.560
<v Speaker 1>him goal line fades and he'll go get it. So

0:34:25.600 --> 0:34:28.200
<v Speaker 1>he's not your typical under six foot guy where it's like, hey,

0:34:28.239 --> 0:34:31.359
<v Speaker 1>his catch radius is tiny. He does have drops, but

0:34:31.480 --> 0:34:34.879
<v Speaker 1>he also makes contested catches where he'll climb the letter

0:34:34.920 --> 0:34:37.200
<v Speaker 1>and go get it after the Catchy's electric twenty one

0:34:37.239 --> 0:34:40.920
<v Speaker 1>yards per punt return last year, including two touchdowns. I

0:34:40.960 --> 0:34:43.120
<v Speaker 1>think Jalen Ragor immediately makes you a team that has

0:34:43.160 --> 0:34:45.919
<v Speaker 1>a threat at punt returner, a deep threat, a guy

0:34:45.920 --> 0:34:48.600
<v Speaker 1>who's held to deal with in the screen game and

0:34:48.880 --> 0:34:52.320
<v Speaker 1>doesn't play small. I think Ragor's a really good prospect

0:34:52.320 --> 0:34:53.920
<v Speaker 1>if you go he was nineteen years old and he

0:34:54.040 --> 0:34:56.520
<v Speaker 1>dominated the Big twelve with bad quarterback well. He came

0:34:56.520 --> 0:34:58.239
<v Speaker 1>out of Walks a Hatchie and he had a couple

0:34:58.200 --> 0:34:59.800
<v Speaker 1>of receivers at Walks a Hatchie too when he was

0:34:59.800 --> 0:35:01.920
<v Speaker 1>in high school and he was head and shoulders over

0:35:02.000 --> 0:35:04.399
<v Speaker 1>everyone best high school receiver in the area by far.

0:35:04.520 --> 0:35:06.719
<v Speaker 1>But you also look at if you do go and

0:35:06.760 --> 0:35:08.759
<v Speaker 1>get a guy like Ragor, that means you're probably not

0:35:08.800 --> 0:35:11.319
<v Speaker 1>going to bring back Randall Cobb. Right, yeah, I'm you're

0:35:11.360 --> 0:35:15.640
<v Speaker 1>you're done with Cobb and so you'll have gallup. Ragor's

0:35:16.239 --> 0:35:18.960
<v Speaker 1>probably Cooper. Yeah. Yeah, that's kind of a hesitant thing

0:35:19.360 --> 0:35:22.799
<v Speaker 1>at the moment. But I mean I'm not now, bring

0:35:22.840 --> 0:35:26.520
<v Speaker 1>on the forty burger offense. Forty burgers, Blake Jarwin, Maybe

0:35:26.600 --> 0:35:29.280
<v Speaker 1>get another tight end to work with him in Dalton Schultz,

0:35:29.400 --> 0:35:33.480
<v Speaker 1>bring on a stud that's I mean mine, it's completely

0:35:33.640 --> 0:35:36.880
<v Speaker 1>logical to think, with the way that this thing is

0:35:37.080 --> 0:35:41.439
<v Speaker 1>stacked up, I think the value at seventeen might be

0:35:41.440 --> 0:35:45.759
<v Speaker 1>best at like receiver and maybe cornerback. Almost Fuck, you're

0:35:45.760 --> 0:35:47.560
<v Speaker 1>in a position there where you're not allowed to complain

0:35:47.600 --> 0:35:51.359
<v Speaker 1>about the defense though, because you're not addressing it. Because

0:35:51.360 --> 0:35:53.400
<v Speaker 1>you're not addressing of course, well, because when it was

0:35:53.719 --> 0:35:56.440
<v Speaker 1>the constant problem all year long. What if I tell

0:35:56.520 --> 0:35:58.680
<v Speaker 1>you you're right, the defense was way more in my

0:35:58.719 --> 0:36:02.239
<v Speaker 1>opinion why the Cowboys were mediocre than the offense. But

0:36:02.960 --> 0:36:06.200
<v Speaker 1>if I tell you that they bring back Robert Quinn. Okay,

0:36:06.280 --> 0:36:09.319
<v Speaker 1>now we're talking, and you know they're not if they

0:36:09.320 --> 0:36:11.520
<v Speaker 1>bring back Robert Quinn. They're not going to sign anybody

0:36:11.560 --> 0:36:15.200
<v Speaker 1>like Juicy at D tackle or corner, but they'll fill

0:36:15.239 --> 0:36:18.719
<v Speaker 1>those voids if you can get me Robert Quinn and

0:36:18.800 --> 0:36:21.680
<v Speaker 1>Anthony brown back. Okay, are we cooking with that? Now

0:36:21.719 --> 0:36:24.480
<v Speaker 1>we're cooking. Okay, Now I'm more willing to do something

0:36:24.520 --> 0:36:26.719
<v Speaker 1>like that. Yeah, which little crazy in the first round.

0:36:26.800 --> 0:36:28.600
<v Speaker 1>It's hard to talk about until you see that. And

0:36:28.760 --> 0:36:31.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't think they would. I don't really think they should,

0:36:31.640 --> 0:36:33.279
<v Speaker 1>but man, it would be fun. Okay, Well, once again,

0:36:33.320 --> 0:36:34.719
<v Speaker 1>and I hope a lot of teams are thinking this

0:36:34.760 --> 0:36:37.160
<v Speaker 1>way because I think it's going to be insane. I

0:36:37.239 --> 0:36:39.799
<v Speaker 1>do think, and I love Ragor, but I also love

0:36:39.840 --> 0:36:41.600
<v Speaker 1>a ton of other guys. And that's where I kind

0:36:41.600 --> 0:36:43.520
<v Speaker 1>of go. Why am I taking a right wide receiver

0:36:43.560 --> 0:36:45.520
<v Speaker 1>at seventeen? I can get a good one at fifty one?

0:36:45.560 --> 0:36:46.799
<v Speaker 1>Oh my god. I can get a good one at

0:36:46.840 --> 0:36:49.200
<v Speaker 1>eighty two. Oh my god. Can I get a decent

0:36:49.200 --> 0:36:52.000
<v Speaker 1>one receiver in round four at twenty four? Yeah? I

0:36:52.000 --> 0:36:54.520
<v Speaker 1>think I can, but I would because there's twenty five

0:36:54.560 --> 0:36:55.800
<v Speaker 1>of them that are going to go in the first

0:36:56.040 --> 0:36:58.759
<v Speaker 1>three or four rounds. I want impact, like my right

0:36:58.840 --> 0:37:05.240
<v Speaker 1>wide receivers goes Lamb and Judy Gap, Rugs and Ragor Gap.

0:37:06.040 --> 0:37:08.680
<v Speaker 1>And then we start listing all these te Higgins and

0:37:08.760 --> 0:37:11.000
<v Speaker 1>Laviscas Chanalt and then maybe there's another Gap and then

0:37:11.480 --> 0:37:14.200
<v Speaker 1>my Pittman and au can say has a lot of

0:37:14.200 --> 0:37:16.960
<v Speaker 1>really good players. There's a lot of NFL starters. You

0:37:16.960 --> 0:37:20.719
<v Speaker 1>have Higgins and Chanlt below Rag. So yeah, and we

0:37:20.760 --> 0:37:22.759
<v Speaker 1>aren't doing this as one of the hypotheticals in the

0:37:22.800 --> 0:37:24.560
<v Speaker 1>third segment, but who would you pick? Would you pick

0:37:24.680 --> 0:37:28.879
<v Speaker 1>Rugs or Ragor? He said, he already did. I did,

0:37:28.920 --> 0:37:32.560
<v Speaker 1>I said right now, because we shouldn't be talking about

0:37:32.600 --> 0:37:34.720
<v Speaker 1>one and not the other, is what I'm saying. Okay,

0:37:34.840 --> 0:37:37.759
<v Speaker 1>but at the moment, I have Rugs above, and that's

0:37:37.760 --> 0:37:40.200
<v Speaker 1>fair because everyone's talking about Rugs and no one's really

0:37:40.200 --> 0:37:42.719
<v Speaker 1>talking about everybody's pretending there's three names that if you

0:37:42.800 --> 0:37:44.640
<v Speaker 1>got to seventeen, it's like, oh, maybe you can't pass

0:37:44.680 --> 0:37:46.600
<v Speaker 1>them up. And I think that should be four. Both

0:37:46.640 --> 0:37:48.440
<v Speaker 1>of them think you should at least be in the conversation.

0:37:48.480 --> 0:37:50.920
<v Speaker 1>I do should be there to Yeah, other people are

0:37:50.960 --> 0:37:53.880
<v Speaker 1>gonna think should be there too, or even Auk or

0:37:53.920 --> 0:37:57.040
<v Speaker 1>t Higgins, but those are my four. I think I've

0:37:57.160 --> 0:37:59.719
<v Speaker 1>kind of mentally written and it's not fair. I'm not

0:37:59.760 --> 0:38:03.240
<v Speaker 1>saying it is. I've kind of mentally written Levisca Chennault

0:38:03.440 --> 0:38:07.040
<v Speaker 1>off because he doesn't really fit what the Cowboys needs.

0:38:07.080 --> 0:38:09.520
<v Speaker 1>He's a bit player. He's not a bad no, not

0:38:09.560 --> 0:38:11.160
<v Speaker 1>in a bad way, but like he is kind of

0:38:11.160 --> 0:38:13.759
<v Speaker 1>a jet sweep and screen and after catch, and he's

0:38:13.960 --> 0:38:16.640
<v Speaker 1>a different He's a big body, a bigger bodied guy

0:38:16.800 --> 0:38:20.000
<v Speaker 1>like I'm he's not the typical slot burner. Yeah, you

0:38:20.040 --> 0:38:23.040
<v Speaker 1>want the gu's gonna blow past everybody, right, And I

0:38:23.080 --> 0:38:24.959
<v Speaker 1>don't know that that's him. I don't think he's gonna

0:38:25.040 --> 0:38:28.439
<v Speaker 1>run a particularly impressive forty for a receiver. Yeah. So

0:38:29.040 --> 0:38:31.600
<v Speaker 1>not saying he's not a good player, but in my mind,

0:38:31.760 --> 0:38:34.719
<v Speaker 1>I just don't see him here. So I'm not even

0:38:34.760 --> 0:38:36.600
<v Speaker 1>really thinking about him that much. But I do think

0:38:36.600 --> 0:38:40.319
<v Speaker 1>he will be drafted fairly high. Okay, anyway, I see that.

0:38:40.440 --> 0:38:41.920
<v Speaker 1>I see what you're saying there in terms of the

0:38:41.920 --> 0:38:44.480
<v Speaker 1>bigger bodied receiver on the outside. So that's gonna do

0:38:44.480 --> 0:38:46.080
<v Speaker 1>it for Twitter on the twenty. We're gonna cut it

0:38:46.080 --> 0:38:47.680
<v Speaker 1>short a little bit today, We'll get to some of

0:38:47.680 --> 0:38:50.520
<v Speaker 1>your other tweets on Twitter at some point throughout the

0:38:50.560 --> 0:38:54.879
<v Speaker 1>next week. However, when we come back, Kat has some hypothetics.

0:38:54.880 --> 0:38:57.160
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna play a little bit of this or that

0:38:57.239 --> 0:39:00.239
<v Speaker 1>before Jeff Cavanall trips out of his chair. We'll be

0:39:00.280 --> 0:39:02.560
<v Speaker 1>back in them here on the Dallas Cowboys dot Com

0:39:02.600 --> 0:39:14.839
<v Speaker 1>Draft show. Your new apartment's big? Such a great deal?

0:39:15.840 --> 0:39:24.000
<v Speaker 1>That's okay, just okay? What's right about the subway? Well,

0:39:24.160 --> 0:39:28.080
<v Speaker 1>I bet you don't even notice it after that's my neighbor.

0:39:28.840 --> 0:39:32.600
<v Speaker 1>Hang deal, that's just okay, it's not okay. Get a

0:39:32.640 --> 0:39:35.239
<v Speaker 1>great deal with America's best network. Come into an AT

0:39:35.320 --> 0:39:36.759
<v Speaker 1>and T store to find out how to get one

0:39:36.760 --> 0:39:39.560
<v Speaker 1>of our popular smartphones for zero dollars down based on

0:39:39.640 --> 0:39:42.040
<v Speaker 1>GWS one course September twenty nineteen. Do you want the

0:39:42.120 --> 0:39:45.440
<v Speaker 1>most interesting, up to the minute Dallas Cowboys news straight

0:39:45.440 --> 0:39:48.840
<v Speaker 1>from the Star in Frisco? How about exclusive and on command.

0:39:49.080 --> 0:39:52.080
<v Speaker 1>That's right, news and nuggets you can't find anywhere else.

0:39:52.239 --> 0:39:55.520
<v Speaker 1>With our exclusive Cowboys content on Alexa, you can have

0:39:55.560 --> 0:39:59.600
<v Speaker 1>all the answers, secrets, stories and more. What's Stephen Jones

0:39:59.680 --> 0:40:03.160
<v Speaker 1>thinking during a game? What's Joe Looney's favorite pregame meal.

0:40:03.360 --> 0:40:06.480
<v Speaker 1>We take your questions to Cowboys players and coaches and

0:40:06.560 --> 0:40:09.160
<v Speaker 1>you can hear the answers directly back to you. Just

0:40:09.160 --> 0:40:12.319
<v Speaker 1>say Alexa open Dallas Cowboys. Whether you're into being a

0:40:12.360 --> 0:40:18.359
<v Speaker 1>part of this or more into something like this, Sea

0:40:18.440 --> 0:40:21.319
<v Speaker 1>Geek has the tickets to the events you love. It's

0:40:21.360 --> 0:40:25.120
<v Speaker 1>the easiest way to find, buy and sell tickets. Plus,

0:40:25.239 --> 0:40:28.640
<v Speaker 1>with their deal score technology, they'll recommend the best seats

0:40:28.640 --> 0:40:30.959
<v Speaker 1>in the house at the best value. So the next

0:40:30.960 --> 0:40:39.560
<v Speaker 1>time you're craving this, don't load the Sea Geek app

0:40:39.600 --> 0:40:42.879
<v Speaker 1>and let's go seek. Ladies and gentlemen. It's that time

0:40:42.920 --> 0:40:46.239
<v Speaker 1>again for tailgating with the Autterbox boys. Autter Box the

0:40:46.239 --> 0:40:49.719
<v Speaker 1>company that builds wildly overproductive phone cases the one and only,

0:40:49.840 --> 0:40:52.480
<v Speaker 1>but cases are just the start. Auterbox is the official

0:40:52.480 --> 0:40:55.200
<v Speaker 1>outfitter of tailgating. If they can keep my phone safe,

0:40:55.239 --> 0:40:57.359
<v Speaker 1>what can they do for my parking lot party? How

0:40:57.360 --> 0:41:00.839
<v Speaker 1>about protecing your beverages from suboptimal drinking temperatures with their

0:41:00.840 --> 0:41:04.520
<v Speaker 1>elevation tumblers and Auterbox elevation tumblers come in three sizes,

0:41:04.600 --> 0:41:07.000
<v Speaker 1>a ten ouncer, a twenty ouncer, and even a sixty

0:41:07.040 --> 0:41:09.920
<v Speaker 1>four ounce growler. Check out all the colors and sizes

0:41:09.960 --> 0:41:14.680
<v Speaker 1>of their elevation tumblers at auterbox dot com. This is

0:41:14.680 --> 0:41:21.120
<v Speaker 1>the Dallas Cowboys dot Com Draft Show. Final segment Here

0:41:21.200 --> 0:41:24.880
<v Speaker 1>from the Star in Frisco, episode number five of the

0:41:24.960 --> 0:41:27.560
<v Speaker 1>Dallas Cowboys dot Com Draft Show. Thanks for joining us,

0:41:27.920 --> 0:41:31.200
<v Speaker 1>Jeff Cavanaugh, Kevin Turner, David Helman, I'm Kyle Yeoman's and

0:41:31.760 --> 0:41:35.439
<v Speaker 1>Katie Mister Katie fund tweets over across the table from

0:41:35.440 --> 0:41:39.880
<v Speaker 1>me has some juicy pairings that we're gonna have to

0:41:40.040 --> 0:41:43.360
<v Speaker 1>decipher as a GM. Now, I want to clarify this.

0:41:43.400 --> 0:41:46.840
<v Speaker 1>Are we the GM of the Cowboys? Are we just? Uh? Anyway?

0:41:46.880 --> 0:41:49.680
<v Speaker 1>General GM? Who's the better put GM of your own

0:41:50.120 --> 0:41:53.200
<v Speaker 1>your draft in your head? Yelman's team. Let's imagine that

0:41:53.239 --> 0:41:55.160
<v Speaker 1>we're in our own war room here and we're just

0:41:55.160 --> 0:41:57.680
<v Speaker 1>sitting around talking about players. We're trying to build a board.

0:41:57.719 --> 0:42:00.400
<v Speaker 1>All right, who would you rather have? Let's take roster

0:42:00.560 --> 0:42:02.960
<v Speaker 1>needs out of it. Okay, who would you rather have?

0:42:03.080 --> 0:42:05.000
<v Speaker 1>Right here? So I'm two guys and we're gonna try

0:42:05.040 --> 0:42:07.040
<v Speaker 1>to come to a consensus. We're gonna stack him on

0:42:07.080 --> 0:42:11.040
<v Speaker 1>the board. Let's start hit wide receiver, SMU wide receiver

0:42:11.239 --> 0:42:18.759
<v Speaker 1>James Proche versus Texas wide receiver Colin Johnson. I don't

0:42:18.760 --> 0:42:20.640
<v Speaker 1>even think this is close. I think it's unfair. I

0:42:20.640 --> 0:42:23.040
<v Speaker 1>would go Colin Johnson, but I think it's unfair because

0:42:23.040 --> 0:42:26.440
<v Speaker 1>it's big versus little. Yeah, give me Proche all day. Wow,

0:42:26.600 --> 0:42:29.720
<v Speaker 1>you don't think it's close. I would. No, I don't.

0:42:29.760 --> 0:42:32.920
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. I maybe again like my own biases

0:42:32.960 --> 0:42:35.040
<v Speaker 1>in my head, but I got him both in the

0:42:35.080 --> 0:42:38.719
<v Speaker 1>fourth round. Okay, I mean no, I guess so, yeah,

0:42:38.719 --> 0:42:43.840
<v Speaker 1>I just Colin Johnson to me, he's just a big bodied,

0:42:44.000 --> 0:42:47.080
<v Speaker 1>slow guy, And I like, what am I? I don't

0:42:47.080 --> 0:42:48.680
<v Speaker 1>know what am I doing with him? And I guess

0:42:48.920 --> 0:42:51.440
<v Speaker 1>I am thinking about Dak Prescott in this instance. But

0:42:52.120 --> 0:42:54.640
<v Speaker 1>what's what's he helping Dak with? I don't know. And

0:42:54.680 --> 0:42:56.560
<v Speaker 1>I remember you talking about him at the Senior Bowl. You.

0:42:56.800 --> 0:42:58.480
<v Speaker 1>I remember you and I walked up to each other

0:42:58.480 --> 0:43:01.000
<v Speaker 1>and you said, man, he is slow. He looks he

0:43:01.080 --> 0:43:04.399
<v Speaker 1>got open because he's big bodied. I mean, he can

0:43:04.480 --> 0:43:06.680
<v Speaker 1>use that in his favor, but like he just kind

0:43:06.719 --> 0:43:09.560
<v Speaker 1>of plods down field. He's twenty pounds away from being

0:43:09.560 --> 0:43:14.440
<v Speaker 1>a tight end. I mean twenty I mean he's huge.

0:43:15.239 --> 0:43:18.680
<v Speaker 1>I think he's I think he's very well aware of

0:43:18.680 --> 0:43:21.080
<v Speaker 1>what his deficiencies are, and I think he's going to

0:43:21.120 --> 0:43:23.160
<v Speaker 1>do everything that he can to try to get better

0:43:23.200 --> 0:43:24.640
<v Speaker 1>in that. I don't know how he can just get

0:43:24.680 --> 0:43:28.440
<v Speaker 1>a little faster. I think his deficiencies can be changed.

0:43:29.080 --> 0:43:31.360
<v Speaker 1>I don't think whatever. I don't think whatever cathlete he

0:43:31.560 --> 0:43:33.239
<v Speaker 1>is is what he's going to be. I don't think

0:43:33.280 --> 0:43:34.800
<v Speaker 1>that there's like that's one of those things where you

0:43:34.800 --> 0:43:36.600
<v Speaker 1>just say, hey, he's not he's if he If he's

0:43:36.640 --> 0:43:38.600
<v Speaker 1>a four six guy, he's just gonna be a four six.

0:43:38.719 --> 0:43:40.759
<v Speaker 1>I don't think he's stiff though. I think you shou

0:43:40.800 --> 0:43:43.520
<v Speaker 1>see him turn his hips not on not on route running,

0:43:43.520 --> 0:43:47.160
<v Speaker 1>but like adjusting the back shoulder throws and you'll go

0:43:47.160 --> 0:43:49.279
<v Speaker 1>go up and get the you know the big ten

0:43:49.360 --> 0:43:51.319
<v Speaker 1>fifty fifty ball and all that stuff. You see him

0:43:51.360 --> 0:43:54.440
<v Speaker 1>do that stuff. But I think he knows, like, Okay,

0:43:54.520 --> 0:43:57.399
<v Speaker 1>I don't think he's just a pure straight line guy.

0:43:57.440 --> 0:43:59.919
<v Speaker 1>I think he can do more than what we've seen.

0:44:00.480 --> 0:44:03.440
<v Speaker 1>Uh proche catches everything and gets open and he's everything

0:44:03.480 --> 0:44:05.319
<v Speaker 1>you probably want as a tiny guy. And that's why

0:44:05.320 --> 0:44:07.560
<v Speaker 1>I put these guys together because there's a seven inch difference.

0:44:07.560 --> 0:44:09.319
<v Speaker 1>There were a couple of times though, at the Senior

0:44:09.320 --> 0:44:11.200
<v Speaker 1>Bowl that I thought James Prochet was moving in slow

0:44:11.239 --> 0:44:13.480
<v Speaker 1>motion too. He's I mean, I don't he's not a

0:44:13.520 --> 0:44:15.560
<v Speaker 1>burn I don't think he's twitchy. I don't think I

0:44:15.600 --> 0:44:17.719
<v Speaker 1>think he's just a really solid player. I think he's

0:44:17.719 --> 0:44:21.279
<v Speaker 1>got great hand, give me up, give me I think

0:44:21.280 --> 0:44:23.399
<v Speaker 1>he high points the ball better than Colin Johnson does.

0:44:23.440 --> 0:44:28.319
<v Speaker 1>What you're saying, something high, Yeah, one can't get there.

0:44:28.400 --> 0:44:30.600
<v Speaker 1>You gotta put it on Proche too. There are a

0:44:30.600 --> 0:44:33.040
<v Speaker 1>few players watching him on tape where the balls a

0:44:33.040 --> 0:44:35.279
<v Speaker 1>little bit behind him and you see, okay, well it's

0:44:35.280 --> 0:44:37.319
<v Speaker 1>got to be on his chest or otherwise he's not

0:44:37.360 --> 0:44:39.279
<v Speaker 1>gonna get it. And that's it's like that for a

0:44:39.280 --> 0:44:41.600
<v Speaker 1>lot of those smaller guys, you know, with Colin Johnson,

0:44:41.640 --> 0:44:44.760
<v Speaker 1>he built Ellinger out a lot. Yeah, and that's something

0:44:44.800 --> 0:44:47.360
<v Speaker 1>I think when you're talking about a fourth, fifth round area,

0:44:47.440 --> 0:44:49.880
<v Speaker 1>which is where I kind of have these guys, I

0:44:49.920 --> 0:44:52.080
<v Speaker 1>just think it's a little interesting. It does depend on

0:44:52.160 --> 0:44:54.799
<v Speaker 1>what you need. I've got Johnson one peg higher than

0:44:54.840 --> 0:44:56.759
<v Speaker 1>Proche on my board. Y'all are gonna hate what I'm

0:44:56.800 --> 0:44:59.240
<v Speaker 1>about to say, because one guy went in the first

0:44:59.320 --> 0:45:01.640
<v Speaker 1>round and one guy we're talking about on day three.

0:45:01.719 --> 0:45:04.320
<v Speaker 1>But Proche just reminded me of like a poor man's

0:45:04.440 --> 0:45:06.440
<v Speaker 1>Dj Moore, who was my pet cat a couple of

0:45:06.520 --> 0:45:09.880
<v Speaker 1>years ago. Like they're similarly built, and no, I know,

0:45:10.000 --> 0:45:12.480
<v Speaker 1>like More is the better athlete, but just watching him

0:45:12.520 --> 0:45:16.279
<v Speaker 1>move like Proche when he gets the ball to meet,

0:45:16.320 --> 0:45:18.160
<v Speaker 1>like he almost looks like a running back. Like I

0:45:18.239 --> 0:45:20.759
<v Speaker 1>love his contact balance, I love his movement ability, low

0:45:20.800 --> 0:45:23.680
<v Speaker 1>center of gravity, very low center of gravity. He catches everything.

0:45:23.680 --> 0:45:26.560
<v Speaker 1>He catches balls like a bigger receiver at times. I

0:45:26.640 --> 0:45:30.319
<v Speaker 1>just I was very impressed watching him a couple times

0:45:31.760 --> 0:45:34.520
<v Speaker 1>because I didn't see a great after the catch guy.

0:45:34.520 --> 0:45:36.879
<v Speaker 1>And to me, that's what made Dj Moore was once

0:45:36.880 --> 0:45:39.720
<v Speaker 1>the balls in his hands, you are in troube which

0:45:40.040 --> 0:45:43.680
<v Speaker 1>to beef. I'm I'm basing this more on practices than

0:45:43.760 --> 0:45:46.239
<v Speaker 1>tape study, Okay, but he stood out to me in

0:45:46.400 --> 0:45:48.759
<v Speaker 1>mobile for sure. Yeah, And I thought he looked great

0:45:48.840 --> 0:45:50.680
<v Speaker 1>mobile too. And I've seen some of the insane catches

0:45:50.719 --> 0:45:54.080
<v Speaker 1>he makes in his workouts, and like, I've seen the

0:45:54.200 --> 0:45:56.200
<v Speaker 1>good things, but I thought that on tape and he's

0:45:56.239 --> 0:45:58.920
<v Speaker 1>great production. You're big junior year, big senior year. But

0:45:59.320 --> 0:46:00.880
<v Speaker 1>to me, I just guy that. I was like, he

0:46:00.920 --> 0:46:03.400
<v Speaker 1>does everything right, Like he's a solid route runner, he

0:46:03.440 --> 0:46:05.920
<v Speaker 1>comes back to the ball, he's gonna catch it. He

0:46:05.960 --> 0:46:08.160
<v Speaker 1>does everything right. But I didn't see anything that jumped

0:46:08.160 --> 0:46:11.000
<v Speaker 1>out at me as like ooh, that's special set Bitylan

0:46:11.040 --> 0:46:13.960
<v Speaker 1>Suton's kind of my reckless comp for Colin Johnson too.

0:46:14.200 --> 0:46:21.759
<v Speaker 1>Yeah for me, you said, and and I mean, look

0:46:21.800 --> 0:46:24.080
<v Speaker 1>it will for teams. That comes down to what you

0:46:24.120 --> 0:46:26.880
<v Speaker 1>need or whatever. But for the record, like Jeff, the

0:46:26.920 --> 0:46:29.120
<v Speaker 1>way Jeff just described him, isn't that what you're looking

0:46:29.120 --> 0:46:32.200
<v Speaker 1>for in a Day three receiver anyway? Like the special guys.

0:46:32.719 --> 0:46:35.520
<v Speaker 1>The special guys are off the board by pick one

0:46:35.760 --> 0:46:38.160
<v Speaker 1>twenty Yeah, yeah, day three, I would be I would

0:46:38.200 --> 0:46:40.400
<v Speaker 1>be happy with that pick. Yeah. Like there's there's slot

0:46:40.400 --> 0:46:43.000
<v Speaker 1>guys that I like a little bit better, like kJ

0:46:43.160 --> 0:46:45.560
<v Speaker 1>Hill at Ohio State. Yeah, him better because I just

0:46:45.600 --> 0:46:48.319
<v Speaker 1>think that there's more explosive route running there. There's a

0:46:48.320 --> 0:46:50.040
<v Speaker 1>better ability to say, is he one of your guys?

0:46:50.280 --> 0:46:53.360
<v Speaker 1>He's Round three guy for me, guy like j Hills

0:46:53.360 --> 0:46:55.479
<v Speaker 1>not in He's not on this segment. Now, kJ Hill,

0:46:55.640 --> 0:46:59.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm kind of surprised that his stock seems so low. Yeah,

0:46:59.560 --> 0:47:02.840
<v Speaker 1>like your senior stats were never big, So I just

0:47:02.880 --> 0:47:05.239
<v Speaker 1>think people haven't done the work yet. Would be my

0:47:05.320 --> 0:47:08.280
<v Speaker 1>game because it's really good. He made people look silly

0:47:08.280 --> 0:47:10.000
<v Speaker 1>all year. I like him a lot for sure. The

0:47:10.040 --> 0:47:12.560
<v Speaker 1>next one is kind of fun here. Let's go to

0:47:12.640 --> 0:47:19.040
<v Speaker 1>safety's Minnesota's safety Antoine Winfield junior y versus California's safety

0:47:19.160 --> 0:47:24.040
<v Speaker 1>Ashton Davis. Before I watched Winfield, I hadn't actually heard

0:47:24.080 --> 0:47:26.360
<v Speaker 1>a lot about him, and i'd seen Ashton Davis is

0:47:26.400 --> 0:47:30.680
<v Speaker 1>pretty much the whole world's third safety behind Delpit and McKinney.

0:47:30.719 --> 0:47:33.799
<v Speaker 1>Winfield's my third safety. Davis is my fifth safety. Can

0:47:33.800 --> 0:47:35.600
<v Speaker 1>I throw in a third in Kyle Dugger because that's

0:47:35.600 --> 0:47:36.960
<v Speaker 1>who I have on the graphic. I might have changed

0:47:36.960 --> 0:47:38.640
<v Speaker 1>the last yeah, I think he changed the last minute.

0:47:38.680 --> 0:47:41.279
<v Speaker 1>It's okay. I've studied talking about all three. I haven't

0:47:41.280 --> 0:47:43.080
<v Speaker 1>studied Duggers, so somebody's gonna have to help me with

0:47:43.080 --> 0:47:47.759
<v Speaker 1>that one. But I think Winfield play free strong. I

0:47:47.800 --> 0:47:50.439
<v Speaker 1>think Winfield can do a little bit of everything. He's

0:47:50.480 --> 0:47:53.320
<v Speaker 1>got the ball production you dream of with the interceptions.

0:47:53.840 --> 0:47:56.759
<v Speaker 1>I think Antoine Winfield's only limitation is his size. And

0:47:57.640 --> 0:48:01.560
<v Speaker 1>his size honestly doesn't bother me too much. I think

0:48:01.560 --> 0:48:03.280
<v Speaker 1>there's another thing. He missed a little bit of twenty

0:48:03.320 --> 0:48:06.240
<v Speaker 1>seventeen with a hammy. Twenty eighteen he tore a ligament

0:48:06.239 --> 0:48:08.680
<v Speaker 1>in his foot. That type of stuff tends to bother me.

0:48:08.760 --> 0:48:12.640
<v Speaker 1>Foot injuries, Yeah, things like that. But man, I think

0:48:12.680 --> 0:48:16.440
<v Speaker 1>also there's so much there, and he plays big too.

0:48:16.600 --> 0:48:18.680
<v Speaker 1>I think he's able to kind of use his body

0:48:18.680 --> 0:48:21.399
<v Speaker 1>and want to hit and things like that. And then

0:48:21.600 --> 0:48:23.560
<v Speaker 1>it does just kind of icing on the cake. You

0:48:23.600 --> 0:48:26.279
<v Speaker 1>see how fast he plays from just to seeing it

0:48:26.400 --> 0:48:27.920
<v Speaker 1>on the field and he go, yeah, he looks like

0:48:27.960 --> 0:48:29.840
<v Speaker 1>a guy who just watched his dad play football for

0:48:29.840 --> 0:48:32.080
<v Speaker 1>fourteen years at one. Windfield was a great player. His

0:48:32.200 --> 0:48:35.000
<v Speaker 1>instincts are really impressive, the way I mean it seems

0:48:35.000 --> 0:48:37.439
<v Speaker 1>like he always has a read on where the ball

0:48:37.560 --> 0:48:40.120
<v Speaker 1>is going or where it is. H Yeah. I think

0:48:40.120 --> 0:48:42.480
<v Speaker 1>I watched him Tuesday afternoon for an hour or so

0:48:42.520 --> 0:48:45.800
<v Speaker 1>and was really impressed. And you like, why are people

0:48:46.040 --> 0:48:48.480
<v Speaker 1>so hung up on his size? I don't really It's

0:48:48.480 --> 0:48:51.360
<v Speaker 1>just an inch, right's six foot instead of five eleven.

0:48:51.400 --> 0:48:53.560
<v Speaker 1>Do you change your mind on a guy five? Did

0:48:54.719 --> 0:48:57.920
<v Speaker 1>he maybe five? I think? Yeah, he's a Minnesota five eleven,

0:48:58.120 --> 0:49:00.680
<v Speaker 1>get this, getting that, getting that idea bump, It's gonna

0:49:00.680 --> 0:49:04.960
<v Speaker 1>be okay. He's gonna be five o nine six, And

0:49:05.360 --> 0:49:08.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't care if that helps him fall to fifty one.

0:49:08.280 --> 0:49:10.560
<v Speaker 1>Let's go. That's okay with me. I agree two things

0:49:10.600 --> 0:49:13.840
<v Speaker 1>about Winfield. First off, I wasn't impressed immediately when I

0:49:13.880 --> 0:49:17.160
<v Speaker 1>started watching him, and I got on a Twitter conversation yesterday,

0:49:17.960 --> 0:49:19.719
<v Speaker 1>you must not have started with the Penn State game.

0:49:19.800 --> 0:49:21.880
<v Speaker 1>I did not start with the Penn State game, the

0:49:22.200 --> 0:49:25.879
<v Speaker 1>real state game. That and Zach Wolchuck from the Fan

0:49:26.200 --> 0:49:28.120
<v Speaker 1>said it, and he was said, look at the Penn

0:49:28.160 --> 0:49:30.920
<v Speaker 1>State game. This is where you'll you'll change your mind. Yeah,

0:49:30.920 --> 0:49:33.040
<v Speaker 1>it changed my mind because he took baby Gronk and

0:49:33.080 --> 0:49:36.040
<v Speaker 1>he made him look silly basically over the course of

0:49:36.080 --> 0:49:40.120
<v Speaker 1>the game. The thing about Winfield it he had seven

0:49:40.160 --> 0:49:44.319
<v Speaker 1>interceptions his final year at Minnesota nine career. That's kind

0:49:44.360 --> 0:49:46.120
<v Speaker 1>of impressive to me. The show that he only had

0:49:46.120 --> 0:49:48.640
<v Speaker 1>a couple in his first few years, and he didn't

0:49:48.680 --> 0:49:50.359
<v Speaker 1>start a whole lot at the beginning of his career

0:49:50.360 --> 0:49:52.440
<v Speaker 1>in Minnesota. It was kind of always hurt too, kind

0:49:52.440 --> 0:49:54.960
<v Speaker 1>of back and forth. He had those injuries in it

0:49:55.040 --> 0:49:57.839
<v Speaker 1>was it twenty seventeen, twenty eighteen, he had he only

0:49:57.840 --> 0:50:00.520
<v Speaker 1>played four games in each of those years. When he

0:50:00.600 --> 0:50:04.080
<v Speaker 1>finally had an opportunity to piece together a year, comes

0:50:04.160 --> 0:50:05.880
<v Speaker 1>up with seven picks. That's the kind of guy that

0:50:05.920 --> 0:50:08.399
<v Speaker 1>you want. I mean, that's what Mike Nolan's been talking

0:50:08.400 --> 0:50:10.080
<v Speaker 1>about over the last couple of weeks. Is a guy

0:50:10.120 --> 0:50:12.160
<v Speaker 1>that you want to be afraid to throw the ball

0:50:12.160 --> 0:50:14.880
<v Speaker 1>to his side because you could take it the other way. Okay,

0:50:14.880 --> 0:50:18.120
<v Speaker 1>we all just agreed. We absolutely love Antoine Winfield. Give

0:50:18.120 --> 0:50:22.080
<v Speaker 1>me a thumbnail on Davis because I think Delpitt, McKinney, Davis,

0:50:22.080 --> 0:50:25.520
<v Speaker 1>and Winfield are pretty clear cut as like the four

0:50:25.600 --> 0:50:28.080
<v Speaker 1>options for the Cowboys at the top of the drive.

0:50:28.200 --> 0:50:30.719
<v Speaker 1>I trust Davis more as a free safety than a

0:50:30.760 --> 0:50:33.400
<v Speaker 1>strong safety. I think Winfield could be a little more complimentary.

0:50:33.400 --> 0:50:35.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean, Davis is gonna come up and he's about

0:50:35.160 --> 0:50:37.840
<v Speaker 1>ten pounds less than Antoine Winfield, and you see it.

0:50:38.040 --> 0:50:40.200
<v Speaker 1>You see how kind of skinny he looks, and that

0:50:40.360 --> 0:50:42.640
<v Speaker 1>kind of bothers me. And there's a couple of miss

0:50:42.680 --> 0:50:44.640
<v Speaker 1>tackles and kind of gotta go low and kind of

0:50:44.640 --> 0:50:46.359
<v Speaker 1>play that way down the box. But he can cover.

0:50:46.400 --> 0:50:48.560
<v Speaker 1>His instincts are good. I like Ashton Davis. I have

0:50:48.600 --> 0:50:52.279
<v Speaker 1>Ashton Davis right behind Winfield in the second round. I mean,

0:50:52.520 --> 0:50:57.520
<v Speaker 1>here's my safety group, Delpitt, McKinney, second round grad Antoine, Winfield,

0:50:57.719 --> 0:51:01.719
<v Speaker 1>Ashton Davis, like it's in the Kyle Dugger's next. So

0:51:01.760 --> 0:51:04.720
<v Speaker 1>it's all in that order. And those guys as helping

0:51:04.719 --> 0:51:06.960
<v Speaker 1>opponent up. I see a lot of tapping guys on

0:51:07.000 --> 0:51:08.799
<v Speaker 1>the helmet after they block him, and I don't like

0:51:08.880 --> 0:51:11.959
<v Speaker 1>a friendly play my favorite. I don't like he's gonna

0:51:11.960 --> 0:51:14.239
<v Speaker 1>go head hunt. I don't like the friendly play. My

0:51:14.239 --> 0:51:16.120
<v Speaker 1>favorite play from him if you go watch the Organ

0:51:16.239 --> 0:51:19.120
<v Speaker 1>game that he helped an opponent up and it happens, man,

0:51:19.160 --> 0:51:25.680
<v Speaker 1>I guys trying to diplomacy many But there's a play

0:51:25.719 --> 0:51:28.560
<v Speaker 1>in the Organ game where he picks off perennial first

0:51:28.640 --> 0:51:32.319
<v Speaker 1>round pick Justin Herbert and everybody picked off. Such a

0:51:32.360 --> 0:51:34.759
<v Speaker 1>good play. It is such a good play. I thought

0:51:35.520 --> 0:51:37.760
<v Speaker 1>sees it. He turns it and he covers the ground

0:51:37.880 --> 0:51:39.680
<v Speaker 1>and makes the pick. He does look like he's beat

0:51:39.760 --> 0:51:43.080
<v Speaker 1>I think when the freaking might have been. But give

0:51:43.120 --> 0:51:44.840
<v Speaker 1>the guy a little bit of credit. He's a good player.

0:51:44.880 --> 0:51:48.359
<v Speaker 1>Winfield's catchup speed really showed in that Penn State game too,

0:51:48.400 --> 0:51:50.680
<v Speaker 1>because I thought he was beating on his first interception.

0:51:50.800 --> 0:51:52.759
<v Speaker 1>Yeah he I mean the guy had steps on him

0:51:52.760 --> 0:51:54.000
<v Speaker 1>and he was like, no, he turned the wrong way,

0:51:54.040 --> 0:51:56.480
<v Speaker 1>he opened the wrong way. Never mind, all right, what

0:51:56.520 --> 0:51:58.759
<v Speaker 1>else you get? The next one? Tight ends Dayton tight

0:51:58.840 --> 0:52:04.319
<v Speaker 1>end Adam Troutman versus Washington tight end Hunter Bryant. I

0:52:04.320 --> 0:52:08.040
<v Speaker 1>feel like this is this depends on what kind of

0:52:08.040 --> 0:52:10.600
<v Speaker 1>player you're looking for. Are you looking for the big No,

0:52:10.840 --> 0:52:13.600
<v Speaker 1>don't cop out Kyle, because we set it's up to you.

0:52:13.840 --> 0:52:17.960
<v Speaker 1>It's not We're not worried about talking. I'm one percent

0:52:18.040 --> 0:52:20.120
<v Speaker 1>gonna take Hunter Bryant. I'm about to tell you why.

0:52:20.200 --> 0:52:24.040
<v Speaker 1>But I'm splitting this up because Adam Troutman is a

0:52:24.200 --> 0:52:26.440
<v Speaker 1>much bigger tight end six five two fifty one. He's

0:52:26.440 --> 0:52:28.600
<v Speaker 1>gonna block for you, even though blocking is not his

0:52:28.680 --> 0:52:32.960
<v Speaker 1>strong point. And then you've got Washington Hunter Bryant, who's

0:52:33.040 --> 0:52:35.239
<v Speaker 1>six two, looks like a slot receiver more than a

0:52:35.280 --> 0:52:37.400
<v Speaker 1>tight end. He's a big and he runs around a

0:52:37.440 --> 0:52:39.440
<v Speaker 1>lot pre snap, and he does a lot of different

0:52:39.440 --> 0:52:43.879
<v Speaker 1>things for you. I'm taking Hunter. They are different players, Hunt,

0:52:43.920 --> 0:52:46.680
<v Speaker 1>but Hunter Bryant was really impressive to me. I put

0:52:46.719 --> 0:52:50.120
<v Speaker 1>on I put on his game against USC. First snap

0:52:50.120 --> 0:52:52.399
<v Speaker 1>of the game, I'm like, all right, is this guy

0:52:52.400 --> 0:52:54.319
<v Speaker 1>on the line? Is he in the slot? Where's he at?

0:52:54.480 --> 0:52:57.759
<v Speaker 1>Couldn't find him? Then I realize he's playing fullback. It's

0:52:57.800 --> 0:53:00.440
<v Speaker 1>sort of an h back type of deal. Taught sweep

0:53:00.680 --> 0:53:02.879
<v Speaker 1>and he takes out a linebacker on the first play

0:53:02.920 --> 0:53:05.560
<v Speaker 1>of the game. Not saying he's like an elite blocker,

0:53:05.840 --> 0:53:07.719
<v Speaker 1>but over the course of the game like he's very

0:53:07.760 --> 0:53:10.560
<v Speaker 1>willing to do it. He blocks downfield for receivers. They

0:53:10.680 --> 0:53:12.799
<v Speaker 1>don't put him on the line a lot, but they

0:53:13.239 --> 0:53:15.319
<v Speaker 1>on occasion, and he gets in there like he's not

0:53:15.400 --> 0:53:17.160
<v Speaker 1>afraid to put his nose in it. Is it getting

0:53:17.200 --> 0:53:19.960
<v Speaker 1>the way guy? That's all in twenty twenty, That's all

0:53:20.000 --> 0:53:22.759
<v Speaker 1>I want. And he's six two two thirty nine runs, well,

0:53:22.920 --> 0:53:26.400
<v Speaker 1>can go downfield. He had an amazing I think it

0:53:26.440 --> 0:53:28.520
<v Speaker 1>was what it was Oregon State where he had like

0:53:28.520 --> 0:53:30.839
<v Speaker 1>one hundred and fifty yards. He had a good game

0:53:30.840 --> 0:53:33.960
<v Speaker 1>against Utah too. I believe I haven't I haven't had

0:53:33.960 --> 0:53:36.160
<v Speaker 1>a chance to watch that game, but I do not

0:53:36.239 --> 0:53:37.799
<v Speaker 1>have the Organ State game. I didn't see that one

0:53:38.080 --> 0:53:41.080
<v Speaker 1>Oregon Hawaii byu USC. In the two games, I watched

0:53:41.120 --> 0:53:43.560
<v Speaker 1>like he was a willing blocker and he's got good

0:53:43.600 --> 0:53:47.319
<v Speaker 1>hands and his dangerous downfield again, you know the old

0:53:47.360 --> 0:53:50.160
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys regime. I'm like, this is exactly the tight end

0:53:50.160 --> 0:53:52.439
<v Speaker 1>that they would never draft. Jeff is a guy who's

0:53:52.560 --> 0:53:55.920
<v Speaker 1>don't know that now many knee surgeries. Does a meniscus

0:53:55.920 --> 0:53:58.320
<v Speaker 1>and an ACL slow you down a little bit because

0:53:58.360 --> 0:54:04.080
<v Speaker 1>you're okay, No, just too fine. Troutman's got three inches

0:54:04.120 --> 0:54:06.319
<v Speaker 1>on him. Obviously he's gonna be a bigger thread over

0:54:06.320 --> 0:54:08.200
<v Speaker 1>the middle of the field. I initially had Hunter Bryant

0:54:08.239 --> 0:54:10.439
<v Speaker 1>graded higher, and then I got a load of Dayton

0:54:10.520 --> 0:54:12.880
<v Speaker 1>film into my drop box and it was go time.

0:54:13.400 --> 0:54:15.520
<v Speaker 1>And you'll see how smooth of a catcher he is

0:54:15.560 --> 0:54:18.160
<v Speaker 1>of the football. Hunter Bryan had drops he did and

0:54:18.200 --> 0:54:20.279
<v Speaker 1>no one's talking about his drops. I was, I like

0:54:20.360 --> 0:54:22.080
<v Speaker 1>you to bring it up. He's a second round graded

0:54:22.120 --> 0:54:24.120
<v Speaker 1>tight end for me. I'm just but I'm taking Troutman

0:54:24.200 --> 0:54:26.879
<v Speaker 1>over Hunter Bryan. I'm scared people are scared of Dayton.

0:54:27.120 --> 0:54:29.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm scared of FCS. No, I'm scared of getting a

0:54:29.600 --> 0:54:34.000
<v Speaker 1>Senior Bowl bump. That's all it is. He's getting eye

0:54:34.080 --> 0:54:37.960
<v Speaker 1>dominated MP is what he's getting. He's a dominant football player.

0:54:40.360 --> 0:54:43.440
<v Speaker 1>Four games at Dayton compared to Bryant, who played in

0:54:43.520 --> 0:54:46.439
<v Speaker 1>Like I believe it was on the graphic a minute ago,

0:54:46.480 --> 0:54:49.000
<v Speaker 1>but it was like twenty something. Maybe I'm just maybe

0:54:49.040 --> 0:54:51.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm just intrigued by the thought that the Cowboys would

0:54:51.600 --> 0:54:54.200
<v Speaker 1>be willing to draft a tweener tight end and Nevin

0:54:54.320 --> 0:54:57.600
<v Speaker 1>Ingram type. Yeah, that's I mean, it's it's twenty twenty. Baby,

0:54:57.760 --> 0:55:00.160
<v Speaker 1>Let's get those red zone mismatches on the T team.

0:55:00.239 --> 0:55:01.879
<v Speaker 1>Let's go. If I'm gonna do that, I'll just draft

0:55:01.880 --> 0:55:04.719
<v Speaker 1>a fast guy though, But I mean, you still just

0:55:04.800 --> 0:55:07.000
<v Speaker 1>draft a fast guy. You still need it? Well, like,

0:55:07.120 --> 0:55:10.919
<v Speaker 1>who who is that? That that's not going to happen?

0:55:13.760 --> 0:55:15.799
<v Speaker 1>Who else got the worst? Is? I? Keep it moving? Here?

0:55:15.800 --> 0:55:18.239
<v Speaker 1>Here we go. Linebackers this time, haven't done a lot

0:55:18.239 --> 0:55:20.600
<v Speaker 1>of this, guys. Nope. And I'm gonna put this as

0:55:20.800 --> 0:55:26.000
<v Speaker 1>edge slash linebacker Wisconsin's Zach Bond up against Oklahoma linebacker

0:55:26.080 --> 0:55:30.399
<v Speaker 1>Kenneth Murray. Better player, stack him on your board. Those

0:55:30.400 --> 0:55:33.520
<v Speaker 1>are different skillets exactly. I'm gonna doing this. I'm gonna

0:55:33.520 --> 0:55:36.600
<v Speaker 1>take don't cop out Dave, don't cop out better player.

0:55:36.680 --> 0:55:39.520
<v Speaker 1>I hate you guys. I'm gonna take Kenneth Murray and

0:55:40.200 --> 0:55:43.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to do it hoping Zach Bond doesn't make

0:55:43.239 --> 0:55:45.680
<v Speaker 1>me look stupid, because maybe a team takes Zach Bond

0:55:45.760 --> 0:55:47.480
<v Speaker 1>and they play him in the t J. Watt role

0:55:47.719 --> 0:55:50.040
<v Speaker 1>and he's able to do it despite his size. He

0:55:50.160 --> 0:55:52.480
<v Speaker 1>just kind of did it Wisconsin. But I think what's

0:55:52.520 --> 0:55:54.440
<v Speaker 1>gonna happen is Zach Bond is gonna get moved to

0:55:54.520 --> 0:55:58.200
<v Speaker 1>off ball linebacker like we did with um who was

0:55:58.280 --> 0:56:01.319
<v Speaker 1>the pass rusher Son Reddicks, where it's like, all right, yeah,

0:56:01.360 --> 0:56:03.440
<v Speaker 1>he's an incredible athlete and he was a pass rusher

0:56:03.480 --> 0:56:05.399
<v Speaker 1>and now he's a linebacker. It's like, well that didn't

0:56:05.400 --> 0:56:07.080
<v Speaker 1>work so well because he was a pass rusher. You

0:56:07.160 --> 0:56:09.560
<v Speaker 1>made him a linebacker. I know what Kenneth Murray is,

0:56:09.680 --> 0:56:11.839
<v Speaker 1>art don't know what Zach Bond is. Our NFL front

0:56:11.880 --> 0:56:15.279
<v Speaker 1>office is as a vanilla or simple, I guess is

0:56:15.320 --> 0:56:16.680
<v Speaker 1>what I would say to get well, t J, why

0:56:16.680 --> 0:56:20.480
<v Speaker 1>I just got defensive MVP. Maybe this guy's Wisconsin guy.

0:56:21.000 --> 0:56:25.080
<v Speaker 1>You are offices think that way, because yeah, I would

0:56:25.160 --> 0:56:27.840
<v Speaker 1>use him as in everything, But I think his strongest

0:56:27.880 --> 0:56:30.840
<v Speaker 1>thing is when he rushes the passer. Yeah, so I

0:56:31.120 --> 0:56:33.319
<v Speaker 1>like Zach bon I've gotten great and higher than Kenneth Murray.

0:56:33.480 --> 0:56:36.279
<v Speaker 1>I have questions about how fast Kenneth Murray sees sees

0:56:36.360 --> 0:56:39.520
<v Speaker 1>the ball. I have plushed like he's motors and he's

0:56:39.560 --> 0:56:41.600
<v Speaker 1>all over the place and all that stuff. But there

0:56:41.640 --> 0:56:44.279
<v Speaker 1>are times when you're like, okay, like are you moving

0:56:44.320 --> 0:56:47.359
<v Speaker 1>towards the ball yet, Like he's says a lot of control. Times. Yeah,

0:56:47.520 --> 0:56:50.200
<v Speaker 1>Like he looks like he's he's overly aggressive, which is good.

0:56:50.320 --> 0:56:52.680
<v Speaker 1>And I think when you look at Bond, he's a

0:56:52.719 --> 0:56:54.719
<v Speaker 1>little bit more calculated in the way that he is

0:56:54.760 --> 0:56:58.760
<v Speaker 1>aggressive compared to Murray, where Murray's just kind of flyball,

0:56:58.840 --> 0:57:01.279
<v Speaker 1>sea ball, go ball, like kind of just go at it.

0:57:02.200 --> 0:57:04.440
<v Speaker 1>And I'm just worry that Bond's gonna go like eighteenth

0:57:04.560 --> 0:57:06.600
<v Speaker 1>and somebody's gonna take this two hundred forty pound pass

0:57:06.680 --> 0:57:08.919
<v Speaker 1>rusher and be like, all right, now, he's a will

0:57:09.040 --> 0:57:11.640
<v Speaker 1>linebacker because he's six three, two forty. If he just

0:57:11.760 --> 0:57:13.960
<v Speaker 1>ruins him, it's a totally new job. If you're drafting

0:57:14.040 --> 0:57:16.520
<v Speaker 1>him that high, I hope you have a better clear

0:57:16.600 --> 0:57:19.280
<v Speaker 1>cut idea of what you want to do. The top ten. Yeah,

0:57:19.320 --> 0:57:20.960
<v Speaker 1>it's because someone's like, oh, went to the senior role

0:57:20.960 --> 0:57:22.680
<v Speaker 1>and he looked like he could cover. I'm gonna cheat

0:57:22.720 --> 0:57:26.040
<v Speaker 1>because I can't completely just forget about the Cowboys when

0:57:26.080 --> 0:57:29.080
<v Speaker 1>I do this, and Bond offers more of what I

0:57:29.240 --> 0:57:33.440
<v Speaker 1>don't have. Like I'm okay with off ball linebackers. I mean,

0:57:33.480 --> 0:57:35.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm assuming Laton vander Esh is gonna be healthy. He

0:57:35.920 --> 0:57:37.800
<v Speaker 1>might be a right defensive end for me. Give me,

0:57:37.920 --> 0:57:40.680
<v Speaker 1>give me, yeah, give me that guy. H Utah safety

0:57:40.760 --> 0:57:44.920
<v Speaker 1>Turell Burgess versus Texas safety Brandon Jones. This is a

0:57:44.960 --> 0:57:47.600
<v Speaker 1>good one. I really Burgess over Jones. I do too,

0:57:47.680 --> 0:57:51.200
<v Speaker 1>because I believe Burgess offers more as a cover guy. Yes,

0:57:51.360 --> 0:57:53.560
<v Speaker 1>but do not play him in the box. I would

0:57:53.640 --> 0:57:55.920
<v Speaker 1>love to, like, tell me what you think about Jones,

0:57:55.960 --> 0:57:59.200
<v Speaker 1>because I didn't really know what to think first. That's

0:57:59.200 --> 0:58:01.360
<v Speaker 1>another guy like it took me five minutes to even

0:58:01.440 --> 0:58:05.640
<v Speaker 1>find him. Brandon Jones six foot two h five. I

0:58:05.760 --> 0:58:07.800
<v Speaker 1>wrote here, let's see so many wide receivers. He ends

0:58:07.840 --> 0:58:12.160
<v Speaker 1>up playing a lot of slot corner carries. Jefferson down

0:58:12.200 --> 0:58:16.360
<v Speaker 1>this against LSU down the field, perfect, Yeah, sideline to

0:58:16.440 --> 0:58:19.280
<v Speaker 1>sideline speed in the run game against TCU, they're playing

0:58:19.280 --> 0:58:21.680
<v Speaker 1>at three, three, five, and he's the fifth dB who's

0:58:21.680 --> 0:58:23.680
<v Speaker 1>more of a third level linebacker. So that's where you're

0:58:23.960 --> 0:58:26.880
<v Speaker 1>struggling to find him. Yeah, shows some versatility to play

0:58:26.920 --> 0:58:29.080
<v Speaker 1>man in his own could probably trust him with backs

0:58:29.120 --> 0:58:32.080
<v Speaker 1>and tight ends. Willing in the run game. Not the

0:58:32.160 --> 0:58:35.760
<v Speaker 1>quickest diagnoser. He will hit, can cover ground, aggressive and

0:58:35.840 --> 0:58:40.280
<v Speaker 1>reliable open tackler. Sounds like I'm talking to Brian Broad

0:58:40.960 --> 0:58:43.000
<v Speaker 1>Totally unrefineding coverage. Let's say you want to know about

0:58:43.000 --> 0:58:44.680
<v Speaker 1>a player, I'll read you my notes. Tries to just

0:58:44.800 --> 0:58:46.720
<v Speaker 1>catch guys when they get to him when he's asked

0:58:46.760 --> 0:58:49.440
<v Speaker 1>to play man, collides and chases. He's a box guy

0:58:49.560 --> 0:58:51.919
<v Speaker 1>with some athletic ability. I don't think. I think it's

0:58:51.920 --> 0:58:53.720
<v Speaker 1>back to the football's a problem. If he's got to

0:58:53.760 --> 0:58:55.320
<v Speaker 1>turn and run with a wide receiver, I think it's

0:58:55.360 --> 0:58:57.520
<v Speaker 1>a problem. And if you stood these guys next to

0:58:57.560 --> 0:58:59.320
<v Speaker 1>each other, and I know if you're watching online you

0:58:59.320 --> 0:59:02.360
<v Speaker 1>can see the grass, you're gonna see Brandon Jones look

0:59:02.400 --> 0:59:06.800
<v Speaker 1>a lot bigger than Trell bur Trell Burgess got to

0:59:06.840 --> 0:59:08.560
<v Speaker 1>be a cover guy on the back end. Brandon Jones,

0:59:08.600 --> 0:59:10.080
<v Speaker 1>to me, has to be a strong and I think

0:59:10.120 --> 0:59:13.400
<v Speaker 1>that's pretty definitive of what these guys can do. There's

0:59:13.400 --> 0:59:15.880
<v Speaker 1>a play against I believe it's against Oregon where Tarrell

0:59:15.960 --> 0:59:18.840
<v Speaker 1>Burgess is running charging towards the line. He blitzed a

0:59:18.880 --> 0:59:21.040
<v Speaker 1>lot and he was a very effective blitzer. But there's

0:59:21.040 --> 0:59:22.800
<v Speaker 1>a player where he's charging to the line, he can

0:59:22.880 --> 0:59:25.320
<v Speaker 1>blow up the running back and he just goes at

0:59:25.360 --> 0:59:28.440
<v Speaker 1>the ankles last minute and doesn't lack wrap up or anything.

0:59:28.480 --> 0:59:30.240
<v Speaker 1>And it's like, yeah, you're not gonna lay the lumber

0:59:30.320 --> 0:59:34.320
<v Speaker 1>on anyone. Dude like is able cover guy, but I

0:59:34.400 --> 0:59:38.920
<v Speaker 1>put that he's a dependable low tackler. He is going

0:59:39.000 --> 0:59:41.800
<v Speaker 1>for your ankles and he will get it. Yeah. Well,

0:59:42.040 --> 0:59:43.920
<v Speaker 1>when I look at Tarrell Burgess, I look at a

0:59:43.960 --> 0:59:46.480
<v Speaker 1>guy who's looking to kind of head hunt for Like

0:59:46.560 --> 0:59:48.040
<v Speaker 1>you said, don't put him in the box, but he's

0:59:48.040 --> 0:59:50.920
<v Speaker 1>gonna still step up and make a consistent tackle there.

0:59:50.960 --> 0:59:53.680
<v Speaker 1>Whereas Brandon Jones, I just don't trust him and cover

0:59:53.840 --> 0:59:55.760
<v Speaker 1>just much. I don't at all trust him and cover.

0:59:56.280 --> 0:59:59.200
<v Speaker 1>I would be nervous. The justin the Justin Jefferson play

0:59:59.200 --> 1:00:02.120
<v Speaker 1>against LSU was very impressive. My eyes kind of bulged

1:00:02.160 --> 1:00:05.720
<v Speaker 1>when I saw that. But I watched two other No,

1:00:06.120 --> 1:00:07.960
<v Speaker 1>I watched two other games and didn't see it. I

1:00:08.080 --> 1:00:10.680
<v Speaker 1>didn't see like an instinct to find the ball. I

1:00:10.800 --> 1:00:12.640
<v Speaker 1>think I think he'll be a he'll be end of

1:00:12.760 --> 1:00:15.960
<v Speaker 1>Day two, early day three, and he'll be a starting

1:00:16.120 --> 1:00:18.520
<v Speaker 1>strong safety in the league. That's fine. I think that's

1:00:18.560 --> 1:00:22.160
<v Speaker 1>what it'll be. I think he's better zone coverage inside

1:00:22.240 --> 1:00:24.760
<v Speaker 1>ten yards up there. Yeah, I think that's probably where

1:00:24.800 --> 1:00:27.840
<v Speaker 1>he mean. He spent his senior season basically playing linebacker.

1:00:27.960 --> 1:00:31.360
<v Speaker 1>That's fair. So yeah. But yeah, okay, so we get

1:00:31.400 --> 1:00:34.240
<v Speaker 1>like five more of these, so put them in goodness?

1:00:36.200 --> 1:00:40.400
<v Speaker 1>One more? Why not? Oh? Sorry? Yeah? Running backs haven't

1:00:40.440 --> 1:00:42.360
<v Speaker 1>done running A lot of running back here, I haven't

1:00:42.400 --> 1:00:44.080
<v Speaker 1>left a lot of running back. Swift is one of them.

1:00:44.280 --> 1:00:46.640
<v Speaker 1>Take Swift. Do you guys want to not do running back? Do? Yeah?

1:00:46.680 --> 1:00:49.280
<v Speaker 1>Next you do? Save that. I haven't watched a lot

1:00:49.400 --> 1:00:52.120
<v Speaker 1>of defense Swift and Dobbins. I know they're both really good.

1:00:52.760 --> 1:00:54.880
<v Speaker 1>How do you want to do defense? Yeah, I'll take

1:00:55.120 --> 1:00:57.320
<v Speaker 1>one of those. Tackle one. Okay, I've watched those guys.

1:00:57.400 --> 1:01:01.000
<v Speaker 1>That's good. TCU defensive tackle Ross black clock. Oh, here

1:01:01.040 --> 1:01:03.160
<v Speaker 1>he goes. We had a we had a thing here,

1:01:03.240 --> 1:01:07.680
<v Speaker 1>little Kyle. Yesterday I watched him. I didn't see anything

1:01:07.720 --> 1:01:11.360
<v Speaker 1>impressive versus Mike Crazy. Yes, yes, you're insane. All right,

1:01:11.400 --> 1:01:13.960
<v Speaker 1>I need to watch more games. I guess Oklahoma defensive

1:01:14.000 --> 1:01:16.160
<v Speaker 1>tackle in the Ville Gallimore. I got him both in

1:01:16.200 --> 1:01:19.000
<v Speaker 1>the second round. I have Blacklock right ahead of Galimore

1:01:19.200 --> 1:01:21.800
<v Speaker 1>to meet. Galimore is a really high upside guy, but

1:01:21.880 --> 1:01:25.400
<v Speaker 1>he's a redshirt senior who never had college production. Direct drafting.

1:01:26.400 --> 1:01:30.040
<v Speaker 1>The glimpses that you see off the ball, tell him.

1:01:30.280 --> 1:01:33.400
<v Speaker 1>Tell me about Blacklock. I watched him play Baylo Blacklock

1:01:33.480 --> 1:01:35.800
<v Speaker 1>co defensive player that year in twenty seventeen. He was

1:01:35.840 --> 1:01:38.600
<v Speaker 1>a monster for TCU. Got hurt with an achilles injury

1:01:38.640 --> 1:01:41.160
<v Speaker 1>in the preseason of twenty eighteen, missed the entire season.

1:01:41.200 --> 1:01:43.560
<v Speaker 1>So he comes back this year and he puts up

1:01:43.600 --> 1:01:47.040
<v Speaker 1>three and a half sacks, active hands inside, he's a whenever.

1:01:47.200 --> 1:01:48.800
<v Speaker 1>He's kind of like what kin Law was at the

1:01:49.280 --> 1:01:51.760
<v Speaker 1>Senior Bowl when we were talking with Nate Newton. He said,

1:01:51.760 --> 1:01:53.600
<v Speaker 1>as if you can get the hands inside of an

1:01:53.680 --> 1:01:56.720
<v Speaker 1>offensive lineman, he's gonna be tough to block. Three that

1:01:56.800 --> 1:01:59.480
<v Speaker 1>was stuck playing the one at TCU. See that's yeah,

1:01:59.640 --> 1:02:02.360
<v Speaker 1>every other and that's fine. This team needs all kinds

1:02:02.400 --> 1:02:04.680
<v Speaker 1>of defensive tackles, but he was playing nose tackle and

1:02:04.760 --> 1:02:08.320
<v Speaker 1>one technique the whole game and did not have a

1:02:08.360 --> 1:02:10.720
<v Speaker 1>lot of opportunities, and it seemed like they would try

1:02:10.760 --> 1:02:12.680
<v Speaker 1>to create free runs for him. He's going to be

1:02:12.760 --> 1:02:15.680
<v Speaker 1>better than a three. I thought he held his own

1:02:15.880 --> 1:02:19.360
<v Speaker 1>against the run way better than Gallimore could ever dream of.

1:02:19.520 --> 1:02:21.280
<v Speaker 1>I think he anchors down a little bit better, and

1:02:21.360 --> 1:02:23.560
<v Speaker 1>I think he gives you a little bit of quickness.

1:02:23.960 --> 1:02:26.840
<v Speaker 1>Gallimore's a better pass rusher, that is what I would say,

1:02:26.880 --> 1:02:29.960
<v Speaker 1>But intently, I think black Luck is a far better

1:02:30.080 --> 1:02:32.280
<v Speaker 1>run player than Gallimore is, and that's where I kind

1:02:32.320 --> 1:02:35.160
<v Speaker 1>of have them black Luck just above Gallimore. Well, the

1:02:35.240 --> 1:02:38.080
<v Speaker 1>thing about Gallimore that I really liked initially, and I

1:02:38.160 --> 1:02:40.200
<v Speaker 1>think it was our first show, Jeff and I kind

1:02:40.200 --> 1:02:43.280
<v Speaker 1>of talked about it. In the lateral movement of Gallimore

1:02:43.320 --> 1:02:45.560
<v Speaker 1>I liked. I think he can go side to side

1:02:45.600 --> 1:02:48.200
<v Speaker 1>a little bit better than most defensive tackles. I think

1:02:48.280 --> 1:02:50.520
<v Speaker 1>Blacklock can do it better than Gallimar. I really can do.

1:02:50.840 --> 1:02:53.560
<v Speaker 1>I think he's more lateral than Gallimore and puts a

1:02:53.600 --> 1:02:56.439
<v Speaker 1>little bit on the table there. Plus he's bigger six

1:02:56.560 --> 1:02:58.720
<v Speaker 1>four compared to six two, and I mean they're about

1:02:58.720 --> 1:03:01.560
<v Speaker 1>the same size weight wise, ye had an achilles last

1:03:01.600 --> 1:03:03.960
<v Speaker 1>year's we talked about twenty eighteen. He towards achilles. So

1:03:04.040 --> 1:03:07.080
<v Speaker 1>if that bothers you, you know, the achilles is an injury?

1:03:07.320 --> 1:03:09.120
<v Speaker 1>Does scare me? How much does that scare you? Though?

1:03:09.200 --> 1:03:13.720
<v Speaker 1>In terms of a defensive tackle though? Is that a

1:03:13.800 --> 1:03:16.760
<v Speaker 1>big enough red flag too? That stuff doesn't bother me

1:03:16.880 --> 1:03:19.320
<v Speaker 1>in twenty twenty, like two years removed from it, I

1:03:19.400 --> 1:03:22.400
<v Speaker 1>think you're fine. Terrier People come back from torn ligaments

1:03:22.440 --> 1:03:25.280
<v Speaker 1>all the time. But yeah, it's a bigger deal. It's weird.

1:03:25.360 --> 1:03:28.120
<v Speaker 1>It's weird to say. But you talked about though, concur

1:03:28.320 --> 1:03:33.160
<v Speaker 1>like recurring tendonitis like ken Law is scarier than like,

1:03:33.320 --> 1:03:35.720
<v Speaker 1>oh I tore a ligament two years ago. Yeah, hopefully

1:03:35.720 --> 1:03:39.360
<v Speaker 1>it gets into seventeen. Yeah, we'll see. Absolutely. I'll watch

1:03:39.480 --> 1:03:42.800
<v Speaker 1>more Blacklock. I just didn't. I didn't see anything, and

1:03:43.440 --> 1:03:46.280
<v Speaker 1>get watching on tape like I'm looking for past rush ability,

1:03:46.320 --> 1:03:48.360
<v Speaker 1>which I know that's not the full that's obviously not

1:03:48.440 --> 1:03:50.720
<v Speaker 1>the full picture. Yeah, but I've seen more of it

1:03:50.880 --> 1:03:53.680
<v Speaker 1>from Gallimore. I need to take a deeper, better, fast

1:03:53.760 --> 1:03:56.480
<v Speaker 1>rusher than Blacklock. In my opinion, watch an Oklahoma State game.

1:03:56.680 --> 1:03:59.480
<v Speaker 1>I will do that. Watch that. That's I watched immediately,

1:03:59.520 --> 1:04:01.320
<v Speaker 1>and then I watched the Baylor game afterwards, and I

1:04:01.360 --> 1:04:02.960
<v Speaker 1>saw kind of what you were talking about. I think

1:04:03.000 --> 1:04:05.040
<v Speaker 1>Baylor kind of ate their lunch in that regard. But

1:04:05.480 --> 1:04:08.040
<v Speaker 1>that's gonna do it here for episode five of the

1:04:08.160 --> 1:04:11.000
<v Speaker 1>Dallas Cowboys dot Com Draft Show. Thanks so much, Katie

1:04:11.040 --> 1:04:14.240
<v Speaker 1>for putting that together. That was fun. Good job. We'll

1:04:14.280 --> 1:04:16.920
<v Speaker 1>address some of that here in a little bit. I

1:04:16.960 --> 1:04:19.600
<v Speaker 1>don't know what's going on, but for David Hellman, for

1:04:19.680 --> 1:04:22.520
<v Speaker 1>Kevin Turner, for Jeff Cavanaugh on Kyle Yeoman's We'll see

1:04:22.520 --> 1:04:24.400
<v Speaker 1>you next Thursday. Here on the Dallas Cowboys dot Com

1:04:24.520 --> 1:04:29.560
<v Speaker 1>Draft Show. This has been a production of Dallas Cowboys

1:04:29.640 --> 1:04:32.280
<v Speaker 1>dot Com and the Dallas Cowboys Football Club.