Speaker 1: All right, happy Friday if you want to say that.
Speaker 1: Not exactly an easy week for us here, but glad
Speaker 1: you're with us. Told free it's eight hundred and nine
Speaker 1: for one Sean. You want to be a part of
Speaker 1: the program, Well, look, I'm not going to spend a
Speaker 1: lot of time on this program saying I tried to
Speaker 1: warn everybody, but it is frustrating. I tried to warn
Speaker 1: everybody with the urgency that all the urgency I had
Speaker 1: in me that I could muster. I literally saw what
Speaker 1: would happen coming, which is why after ten years, I
Speaker 1: don't like writing books. It's too much work and too hard.
Speaker 1: I'm being honest. But I felt the moment called for it,
Speaker 1: because I sensed a moment, a pivotal tipping point moment
Speaker 1: for the country, because of the radical agenda that now
Speaker 1: represents this new democratic, socialist left wing government. And it is,
Speaker 1: unfortunately everything I suspected and more interesting. The White House
Speaker 1: Propaganda Secretary Jensaki, by the way, media fawning over, the
Speaker 1: only one that has asked any tough questions is Peter Doocey,
Speaker 1: the only one good for him, who she called Steve Doocey.
Speaker 1: That would be his father, He's Peter. His name Steve
Speaker 1: is the guy in the morning. Shouldn't be hard to
Speaker 1: figure out unless this forgetfulness thing is all throughout the
Speaker 1: Biden administration, all these truths to be self attlemen and
Speaker 1: women are created equal doubt by the thing you you know, oh,
Speaker 1: oh thing, We all be truth to be self evidue, Oh,
Speaker 1: men and women creative by go you know the you know,
Speaker 1: the thing, the thing, the thing, God, the creator everything anyway,
Speaker 1: announcing confirming that Joe Biden's support for the for designating
Speaker 1: the District of Columbia, d C. As the fifty first state,
Speaker 1: while refusing to offer a timeline. Oh yeah, DC statehood
Speaker 1: was an issue that was raised in previous press prefincts.
Speaker 1: I don't know, I don't remember this being a big
Speaker 1: issue in the campaign except for the people that the
Speaker 1: left wants to cancel and silence and shut down and
Speaker 1: put a muzzle on conservative talk radio and a couple
Speaker 1: of us at Fox and of other people out there,
Speaker 1: you know, Damn Mangino and others. Wasn't a whole lot
Speaker 1: of us. But we told you this was coming. Now,
Speaker 1: what was that mean? And maybe Puerto Rico's next We
Speaker 1: haven't gotten an opinion on that yet. What does that mean, Well,
Speaker 1: that would be two Democratic senators in perpetuity pretty much,
Speaker 1: considering the DC. Considering the DC is the swamp and
Speaker 1: where the bureaucracy is. That's just a reality, and that's
Speaker 1: the goal, and that's the power play, and that Schumer.
Speaker 1: Everything is on the list. And just as another side note,
Speaker 1: and I'm not gonna do it. I told you so up,
Speaker 1: but I tried to warn the country. I know most
Speaker 1: of you understand this, and the seventy five million of
Speaker 1: us certainly understood it. Record record breaking numbers for any
Speaker 1: Republican candidate in history. But now Democrats signaling that Mitch
Speaker 1: McConnell's effort to protect the legislative filibuster, they rejected that too.
Speaker 1: Joe Mansion has said he wouldn't go along with it,
Speaker 1: But then we have people like Mitt Romney and Lisa
Speaker 1: Murkowski and Ben Sass. He can be an ass anyway.
Speaker 1: He turned out to be the biggest disappointment in the
Speaker 1: world anyway, saying they have little interest in bowing to
Speaker 1: his demands. Hours into the new Senate majority, Wow, here
Speaker 1: we go. The games begin. McConnell publicly privately pressed Chucky Schumer,
Speaker 1: the guy who said you watch out. You hear me, Kevanaugh,
Speaker 1: you hear me, Gorcich, You'll you'll regret it, and it'll
Speaker 1: be held to was the zach Liner forgot many Democrats
Speaker 1: arguing that you know, well, okay, what that means is
Speaker 1: they just need the majority, and that means their radical
Speaker 1: leftist agenda is gonna now be thrown down our throat
Speaker 1: and basically take it like it eight year procoli, whether
Speaker 1: you know we do or not. Now there is something
Speaker 1: that should outrage every American. How did this happen? Thousands
Speaker 1: of National Guard troops forced to leave capital grounds and
Speaker 1: they're now sleeping in parking garages where it's freezing. Anyway,
Speaker 1: Twenty five thousand Guard troops been deployed in and around
Speaker 1: the Capital, which by the way, they should have been
Speaker 1: there on the sixth, considering CNN and the Washington Post
Speaker 1: and now telling us investigators believe that this was all
Speaker 1: pre planned and orchestrated, which contradicts the impeachment article. In
Speaker 1: the narrative of their own networks and their own papers,
Speaker 1: and every Democrat, which we'll get to in a second,
Speaker 1: this is sad twenty five thousand troops. Now, I want
Speaker 1: to protect the capital, our institutions, and every elected official.
Speaker 1: I've been clear. I've been clear on this going back
Speaker 1: to Obama and even before that. We got to protect it.
Speaker 1: It's not a liberal Democrat. There has nothing to do
Speaker 1: with Republican Democrat. Nothing. It has to do with you know,
Speaker 1: you cannot let crazy people, you know, literally, and that's
Speaker 1: why I want a nine to eleven style commission report
Speaker 1: get to the bottom of this. How would we ever
Speaker 1: do this? It's disgraceful to our National Guard. We should
Speaker 1: be honored that after what happened in the capital that
Speaker 1: they're they're there to protect us on the front lines.
Speaker 1: And yet you know where's Nancy Pelosi. Well, she's the
Speaker 1: one that worked with the sergeant arms. And how many
Speaker 1: warnings were there that they beforehand that they needed the
Speaker 1: National Guard called up and is rejected. We need to
Speaker 1: get to the bottom of it. I mean, this is
Speaker 1: just wrong. Should be corrected immediately. And I don't even
Speaker 1: know why. And I saw Jill Biden out there today, Jill,
Speaker 1: not Joe, I don't know, handing out I look like
Speaker 1: Halloween candy. I'm not sure cookies there were cookies. I
Speaker 1: didn't see. I couldn't see on the TV anyway. By
Speaker 1: the way, they gave them cookies, So she gave them cookies. Oh,
Speaker 1: this is what Schumer said on the Supreme Court steps.
Speaker 1: I want to tell you Gorsuch. I want to tell
Speaker 1: you Kavanaugh, you have released the whirlwind, and you will
Speaker 1: pay the price. You won't want. I want to tell
Speaker 1: you Van, you have released the whirlwind and you will
Speaker 1: pay the price. You won't know what hit you. If
Speaker 1: you won't know what you're gonna be say a price.
Speaker 1: Imagine if any Republicans said that about Joe Biden. Now
Speaker 1: interesting side note, I saw Naulty over at Breitbart wrote
Speaker 1: an article The Geneva Conventions expressly forbid forcing prisoners of
Speaker 1: war from sleeping on concrete or in garages. Every picture
Speaker 1: I've seen is our National Guard in garages, asleep on
Speaker 1: concrete floors. In other words, yes, the ever weak, frail,
Speaker 1: cognitively struggling Joe the commander in chief, has already treated
Speaker 1: his own troops this way violates the Geneva Conventions. Wow,
Speaker 1: I didn't know that until I read that one. Well,
Speaker 1: what are they gonna do to rectify it? And when
Speaker 1: because I haven't heard anything that that rectified the situation.
Speaker 1: Texas Governor Abbott, New Hampshire Governor Senunu ripping all of
Speaker 1: this and even the vetting of the National Guard, and
Speaker 1: you know what they're gonna do. They're gonna recall their
Speaker 1: their troops back to their states, which they would is
Speaker 1: I understand it, have the have the power to do,
Speaker 1: and I'd like to see him do it. The potus
Speaker 1: offered a solution because I saw multiple reports today that
Speaker 1: he said they can stay at the Trump Hotel instead
Speaker 1: of having as being a basement on a concrete floor,
Speaker 1: sleeping on a concrete floor, freezing with no heat. Unbelievable, unbelievable,
Speaker 1: credible times we're living in here and this this is
Speaker 1: gonna be a rocky time. And this is why I say,
Speaker 1: you've got to engage the American people have got to
Speaker 1: got to engage and understand that you can be in
Speaker 1: touch with your elected officials, tell them how you feel,
Speaker 1: of course peacefully. Um anyway, so you know, it's really amazing, Um,
Speaker 1: the media attacking me already. Hannity said, there's a horrible
Speaker 1: week for Biden. He's only been there full day, Like, well,
Speaker 1: what he's what he's done in a full day. Are
Speaker 1: these are dramatic? What from the Keystone XL pipeline? I know,
Speaker 1: Pete Buddha Judge said, but we want them to get
Speaker 1: good union paying jobs. They had good union paying jobs,
Speaker 1: and I don't believe their numbers either. There are estimates
Speaker 1: out there. State Department study commissioned during the Obama years
Speaker 1: when Joe was sleeping through his VP literally determined that
Speaker 1: the Keystone XL pipeline would create least thirty two hundred
Speaker 1: construction jobs, forty two thousand additional jobs, and generate two
Speaker 1: billion dollars in wages. Well, excuse me, and easy for
Speaker 1: Buddha Judge. We want to get another job, Well, he
Speaker 1: just got a new job with his extensive background and
Speaker 1: experience as mayor of South Beend. I particularly love people
Speaker 1: I know in South Bend. Well, what about you know?
Speaker 1: I thought liberals cared and had compassion and there were
Speaker 1: the leaders in healthcare. What about Biden freezing you know
Speaker 1: the executive order of Donald Trump on insulin and epinephrin
Speaker 1: that was in place until March. Oh, well, we'll do
Speaker 1: get rid of that this mask mandate. Good question by
Speaker 1: Peter Doocey. Well, why did he go to the Lincoln
Speaker 1: Memorial and he didn't have his mask on federal property?
Speaker 1: That was his mandate. You can't even say that. You
Speaker 1: know what about the impact billions of dollars in the
Speaker 1: economy by cutting back on energy production. Now we'll be
Speaker 1: dependent on countries that hate our guts. Again, that's stupid.
Speaker 1: It's not good for national security. Look look at now
Speaker 1: at a time when we need American jobs and we're
Speaker 1: going to open up the borders and we're going to
Speaker 1: offer amnesty. That's that's competition for jobs that'll lower wages
Speaker 1: for hard working Americans. Unbelievable. You know, this whole thing
Speaker 1: on unity is a force too. That's just not his
Speaker 1: legislative proposals. It's all talk and bs. He wouldn't have
Speaker 1: the courage to stand up to his radical base. You know,
Speaker 1: by the way, even rescues and out of pole double
Speaker 1: digit margin of people oppose Biden's decision on the Keystone
Speaker 1: XL pipeline. The American people get it. What the president
Speaker 1: did you know with the Twitter handle and account of
Speaker 1: the US Ambassador to Israel adding West Bank and Gaza, Well,
Speaker 1: that's a message to Israel. Well, the support you got
Speaker 1: from the Trump ears now officially over. We'll get to
Speaker 1: that too. The economic impact is devastating. It is the
Speaker 1: single dumbest economic decision that you could ever make in
Speaker 1: this economy. That also gives a huge geopolitical economic advantage
Speaker 1: to the Chinese because as a matter of that accord,
Speaker 1: they're not held to the same standards as the US.
Speaker 1: Our carbon emissions have been going down in the Trump years.
Speaker 1: This is have been going through the roof. They're the
Speaker 1: number one polluter, but according to the Paris Climate Accords,
Speaker 1: they get to have the status of a developing nation.
Speaker 1: Let me translate, USA pays through the nose. They pay nothing.
Speaker 1: We're a bunch of suckers. To go along with that.
Speaker 1: And by the way, Trump, Wow, Biden's goal of a
Speaker 1: one hundred million doses a day, we were hitting a
Speaker 1: million doses a day. Sorry, that's not exactly the big
Speaker 1: breakthrough that you'd been promising, Joe, that's not what you
Speaker 1: said you were going to do. Unbelievable. Now, Amnesty, that's
Speaker 1: going to be great on the American taxpayers, Energy dependence
Speaker 1: on the American taxpayers, Radical agenda, environmental agenda, American taxpayers.
Speaker 1: Losing our competitiveness literally also becomes eventually a national security threat.
Speaker 1: We're now dependent on countries that hate us for the
Speaker 1: life blood of our economy. No matter what they tell you,
Speaker 1: it's still oil, gas and coal because they haven't come
Speaker 1: up with a with an alternative that work. Chick oh,
Speaker 1: find one. I want to hear it, but it's not windmills.
Speaker 1: I like the line of Senator Steve Danes Montana basically
Speaker 1: saying that killing the Keystone XL pipeline shows Biden's putting
Speaker 1: Saudi Arabia first, not American workers. Looks like he cares
Speaker 1: more about workers in Saudi Arabia than workers in America.
Speaker 1: By the way, over in Canada, they're really ticked off there.
Speaker 1: I mean they're they're livid, they're apoplectic, they're furious, even
Speaker 1: some suggesting that Trudeau offer retaliation. Can you blame them?
Speaker 1: You know, it's incalculable between the Paris Accords and rejoining
Speaker 1: that which that that literally puts first ahead of us,
Speaker 1: gives them a geopolitical advantage and Russia first. How is
Speaker 1: China characterized or categorized as a as a developing nation.
Speaker 1: You know, then you look at well, their own study
Speaker 1: in the Obama administration two billion dollars in wages Keystone
Speaker 1: Xcel pipeline alone. Then you add to that the direct jobs.
Speaker 1: Now the irony here, there are over a thousand workers
Speaker 1: already on the job, in spite of what some medium
Speaker 1: mom people tell you, they're mostly union jobs. Then you've
Speaker 1: got all the even the forty two thousand additional jobs
Speaker 1: that the Obama administration said in their State Department Commission
Speaker 1: study about Keystone. The Association of Oil Pipelines complain, The
Speaker 1: United Association of Union Plumbers and Pipe Fitters complained, Hey,
Speaker 1: that union endorsed Joe in August after he promised to
Speaker 1: kill the pipeline in May, that it was pretty dumb. Guys.
Speaker 1: I don't think your rank and file should be too
Speaker 1: happy with you guys today. Now you add the Paris Accords,
Speaker 1: you add Keystone Xcel pipeline. Then you add, oh, stop
Speaker 1: building the border wall. Okay, projections for jobs there's somewhat unclear.
Speaker 1: One analysis in twenty seventeen said if they'd continue construction
Speaker 1: of the wall, it could impact as many as ten
Speaker 1: five hundred jobs. It's incalculable. And now that you're offering
Speaker 1: amnesty now, displaced workers from COVID, and these three policies alone.
Speaker 1: Now you've got wages that are going to be driven
Speaker 1: lower and lower and lower. And that's why I said
Speaker 1: yesterday this is a disastrous first week for Biden. He
Speaker 1: just doesn't know it yet. The Mob hasn't figured it
Speaker 1: out yet, and they won't figure it out ever because
Speaker 1: they're just running interference for all things democratic radical socialist anyway,
Speaker 1: and are basically just propaganda wings for Biden and social
Speaker 1: We'll continue, all right, for a moment of humor, Chucky
Speaker 1: Schumer announced that the unconstitutional post presidency impeachment shift show
Speaker 1: is moving forward. You said it in a very unique way.
Speaker 1: Listen closely. There will be a trial, and when that
Speaker 1: trial ends, senators will have to decide if they believe
Speaker 1: Donald Donald John Trump incited the erection insurrection against the
Speaker 1: United States. I just hear this correctly, that Donald J.
Speaker 1: Trump incited the erection. Played again. There will be a trial,
Speaker 1: and when that trial ends, senators will have to decide
Speaker 1: if they believe Donald John Donald John Trump incited the
Speaker 1: erection insurrection against the United States. I'm sorry, I can't
Speaker 1: help but laugh. Oh, you just can't make this. I
Speaker 1: know it's serious. These are tough times. I know, I
Speaker 1: get it. I'm paying attention. Let me I explained yesterday.
Speaker 1: I'll give you a smaller synopsis today, not to rehash it,
Speaker 1: but we do have, you know, interesting things that are developing.
Speaker 1: So what's happening now is I guess they're gonna give
Speaker 1: They're gonna send the article over to from the House
Speaker 1: to the Senate, walk it in somberly, you know, ano
Speaker 1: those quickie snap impeachment that they hang onto, and then
Speaker 1: the Senate has to deal with it. And now I
Speaker 1: have my own views on it, but I'm just telling
Speaker 1: you what the reality is going to be and how
Speaker 1: this is all going to go down. And so they'll
Speaker 1: receive it, the President's attorneys, and I think this is
Speaker 1: actually the right thing to do. They have time to
Speaker 1: build their case week or two and about February tenth ish,
Speaker 1: they'll take this up in the Senate. Now here's what's
Speaker 1: happening behind the scenes. Democrats they know it's a lost cause.
Speaker 1: They know they're gonna come out looking petty, that this
Speaker 1: is all vengeance. Their base. Of course, the crazy leftist,
Speaker 1: radical socialist base will love it. They have to appease
Speaker 1: that base that is who keeps them in power. Nancy
Speaker 1: Pelosi is totally beholden. When I say speaker in name only,
Speaker 1: I'm not kidding. Chuck Schumer even afraid of a of
Speaker 1: you know, being outflanked on the left in New York
Speaker 1: for his Senate seat with Congresswoman Accio Cortez, who's left
Speaker 1: open the possibilities you would challenge Schumer. And remember all
Speaker 1: these politicians and this goes for a lot of Republicans too.
Speaker 1: Their number one goal is to keep and maintain power
Speaker 1: and that's it. They go there even with the best intentions,
Speaker 1: and I don't know what happens, but the swamp changes them.
Speaker 1: They enjoy being called senator, congressman, woman, governor whatever you
Speaker 1: happen to be, whatever elected position. It's all crap, it's
Speaker 1: all pretense, it's all bologny. It's meaningless, and but they
Speaker 1: like it. They they want to hang onto it, and
Speaker 1: you know, they wink and not all these deals anyway.
Speaker 1: Democrats they see this as a loser. Now it's pretty
Speaker 1: much within their ranks. They're like why, And there's for
Speaker 1: a lot of reasons. You know, we now are setting
Speaker 1: a precedent here, but the Senate did not dismiss this.
Speaker 1: Democrats and Republicans just outright dismiss it. So they don't
Speaker 1: they don't put their seal of approval, they don't validate
Speaker 1: what the crap that happened in the House by the
Speaker 1: radicals over there, which is a snap impeachment, no hearings, nothing,
Speaker 1: let's go vote on impeachment in a week, okay. So
Speaker 1: them taking it up, they're they're lending their credibility and
Speaker 1: validating what will now be something a new low standard
Speaker 1: for impeachment. And I can pretty much assure you at
Speaker 1: some point in time that the powers ructure in DC
Speaker 1: there's always the EBB and the flow. I watched it
Speaker 1: my entire career started out in radio Reagan was president.
Speaker 1: I've seen the Republican, Republican, Democrat eight years, Republican eight years,
Speaker 1: Democrat eight years, Republican four years, and here we go
Speaker 1: we have the week frail, cognitively struggling Joe. So that
Speaker 1: that's issue one. The number of constitutional attorneys that are
Speaker 1: a against what the House did with their snap judgment
Speaker 1: is growing, and it's getting louder and it makes them
Speaker 1: look bad. The other thing is in any trial don't
Speaker 1: think that the Republicans are that's stupid. I'll remind them,
Speaker 1: and so there won't be any excuses. They'll have the
Speaker 1: power and the ability to bring up all of the
Speaker 1: devices and based on liberal Democrat definition media mob, a
Speaker 1: definition of their inciting language and citing to insurrection. I
Speaker 1: won't play it all now, Maxie Waters, I'll take Trump
Speaker 1: out to night. You'll listen up, you Gorsets and Kavanaugh
Speaker 1: on this, by the way, on the steps of the
Speaker 1: US Supreme Court. Yeah, I'm gonna tell you, Kavanaugh, tell
Speaker 1: you Gorsets, you have released a whirlwind. You will pay
Speaker 1: the price. You won't know what hit you if you
Speaker 1: go forward with these awful actions. Donald Trump said, many
Speaker 1: of you will peacefully, patriotically march to the Capitol to
Speaker 1: let your voices be heard. So the whole argument again,
Speaker 1: you're now validating a snap impeachment. That low is the
Speaker 1: bar to a standard solo. It's just gonna happen again
Speaker 1: and again and again, and it's gonna be never ending. Okay,
Speaker 1: that's the way they want it. Republicans need to play
Speaker 1: by their rules as they go forward, and they're setting
Speaker 1: the precedent. But then you got the whole constitutional argument.
Speaker 1: This is an unconstitutional post presidency impeachment. I've gone through
Speaker 1: that chapter in verse on both my programs. Now, the
Speaker 1: other big problem that is emerging is how the media
Speaker 1: is now beginning to report all of this. I have
Speaker 1: the Washington Post in front of me self style militia
Speaker 1: members planned on storming the US Capitol days in advance
Speaker 1: of the January sixth attack. According to court documents, Fake
Speaker 1: news CNN investigators are pursuing signs the US Capitol riot
Speaker 1: was planned. Well, that takes the entire impeachment article that
Speaker 1: this was a spontaneous riot as a result direct result
Speaker 1: of the words of Donald Trump at the rally on
Speaker 1: January sixth, and frankly, we can now say that the
Speaker 1: Washington Post and fake news CNN, although they don't even
Speaker 1: listen and other parts of the day parts to their
Speaker 1: own news reporting. I mean, you can't make this up.
Speaker 1: I mean, I've got the Washington Post article right here
Speaker 1: in front of me. Self styled militia members from Virginia
Speaker 1: and Ohio and other states made plans to storm the
Speaker 1: US capital days in advance of the January sixth attack,
Speaker 1: and then communicated in real time as they breached the
Speaker 1: building on opposite sides. That sounds planned to me, and
Speaker 1: talked about hunting lawmakers, according to court documents. Now this
Speaker 1: is on top of everything we've already discovered, which is
Speaker 1: there were numerous intelligence reports that in fact, there was
Speaker 1: planning in advance. Hence the Capitol police chief that since
Speaker 1: resigned frankly was a hero here begging for the guard
Speaker 1: to be called up in advance of this and being
Speaker 1: denied in total at the end of the day six
Speaker 1: separate times. Again, we needed nine to eleven style commissioner
Speaker 1: report because this can't happen in our country. We've got
Speaker 1: to protect our institutions and our elected officials. That transcends
Speaker 1: any politics anyway. It goes on to say, so they
Speaker 1: breached the building opposite sides, talked about hunting lawmakers, according
Speaker 1: to the court documents filed. While authorities have charged more
Speaker 1: than a hundred individuals in the riot, details in the
Speaker 1: new allegations against three US military veterans offer a disturbing
Speaker 1: look at what they allegedly said to one another before,
Speaker 1: enduring and after the attack, statements that indicate a degree
Speaker 1: of preparation and determination to rush deep into the halls
Speaker 1: and tunnels of Congress to make citizens arrests on elected officials. Well,
Speaker 1: Donald Trump didn't do that, had no knowledge of that anyway.
Speaker 1: US authorities charged in an apparent an apparent leader of
Speaker 1: bath keepers at some extremist group I had not heard of,
Speaker 1: and they give the guy's name in the attack, alleging
Speaker 1: the Navy ved helped organize a ring of dozens of
Speaker 1: coordinated their movements storm the castle to disrupt the confirmation
Speaker 1: of President elect Joe Biden's electoral college victory. We have
Speaker 1: about thirty or forty of us were sticking together, sticking
Speaker 1: to the plan. According to one person said while the
Speaker 1: breach was underway, according to court documents, you are executing
Speaker 1: citizens arrests. This is a this is all in the
Speaker 1: Washington Post. Rest the Assembly. We have probable cause for
Speaker 1: acts of treason election for am and replied, according to
Speaker 1: audio recordings and communications, we are in the main dome.
Speaker 1: Now we are rocking it. They are throwing grenades, they
Speaker 1: are frigging shooting people with paintballs. But we are in here.
Speaker 1: A woman believed a court documents and the arrest of
Speaker 1: these people, you know, go forward, so literally it undermines
Speaker 1: the entire case. It contradicts their own narrative in their
Speaker 1: own newspaper for their own fake news channel. I mean,
Speaker 1: it's sad. You can't even make this up. I'll go
Speaker 1: to fake news CNN headline. Investigators are pursuing signs the
Speaker 1: US Capitol riot was planned well that contradicts the impeachment
Speaker 1: article that this was a spontaneous riot incited by Donald Trump,
Speaker 1: who said, many of you will peacefully, patriotically march to
Speaker 1: the Capitol, so your voices will be heard from CNN
Speaker 1: fake news. Evidence uncovered so far, including weapons and tactics
Speaker 1: seen on surveillance videos, suggests a level of planning that
Speaker 1: has led investigators to believe the attack on the US
Speaker 1: Capitol was not just a protest that spiraled out of control.
Speaker 1: Federal law enforcement officials say among the evidence, the FBI
Speaker 1: is examining our indicators or indications that some participants at
Speaker 1: the Trump rally out by the Washington Monument left the
Speaker 1: event early, perhaps to retrieve items used on the assault
Speaker 1: in the Capital, and apparently there was intel that was
Speaker 1: completely and totally ignored. I mean, the mob and the
Speaker 1: media is is literally they're contradicting everything that all of
Speaker 1: their fake news people are saying. So Republicans, they're going
Speaker 1: to reject this on constitutional grounds. They're not going to
Speaker 1: validate this ridiculous process, no due process in the House.
Speaker 1: There is low bar, you know, John Thune said in
Speaker 1: an interview, concerns about constitution. Now, they're gonna they're gonna
Speaker 1: use the constitutional path because that's the right path. They're
Speaker 1: also going to use the They're not going to validate
Speaker 1: a snap impeachment, especially when we haven't had an investigation
Speaker 1: of any kind into this. And if it was pre planned,
Speaker 1: that means that Donald Trump couldn't have incited a spontane
Speaker 1: is insurrection, as they say their favorite new word. And
Speaker 1: if a president already left office, the Senate can't remove
Speaker 1: them Under the constitution, removal from the office is the
Speaker 1: primary purpose of impeachment, so they can no longer exercise
Speaker 1: the power of the presidency. He doesn't have those powers.
Speaker 1: He can't exercise powers he doesn't possess. It was a
Speaker 1: great column by Greg Jarrett on this, another great one
Speaker 1: by Alan Dershowitz on this, And you know, Republican senators
Speaker 1: that this is not going to be hard. I don't
Speaker 1: have a worry now but you know they are Republicans
Speaker 1: can't really put a lot of faith, hope, confidence in
Speaker 1: all of that. Whither way, By the way, Maxie Waters declares,
Speaker 1: you know she's the one that said I'm gonna go
Speaker 1: and take Trump out tonight. Was she inciting an insurrection? Anyway,
Speaker 1: She's gonna do everything she can, and she intended to
Speaker 1: continue investigating Trump. We've not stopped. Will continue. They have
Speaker 1: subpoenas we've issued recently. We'll continue our work. Here we
Speaker 1: go never ending. I mean scary times we're living in
Speaker 1: and all things that I told you, we're going to
Speaker 1: hamp it. Political pro impeachment Republicans are already on the
Speaker 1: chopping block. Liz Cheney ready as a primary challenge. I
Speaker 1: don't think that's going to work out or any Republican.
Speaker 1: The real threat of a fracture to the Republican party
Speaker 1: that I don't think. Look, if you want, wait a minute,
Speaker 1: Pelosi to send impeachment. Now there's Nadler and Schiff, it's
Speaker 1: going to be the shift shows you can't even take
Speaker 1: it seriously on one level, you have to take it
Speaker 1: seriously on another. Anyway, So they're rejected on constitutional grounds,
Speaker 1: and you know This is now going to blow up
Speaker 1: in Democrats' faces. Where's Joe Biden? Joe Biden? Remember we
Speaker 1: allays talked in to Clinton ears the Sister Soldier moment.
Speaker 1: Joe will never stand up to his radical base. Forget it.
Speaker 1: You know, they will drop him like a hot potato.
Speaker 1: It's unbelievable. What did Schumer say again today that it's
Speaker 1: definitely gonna happen. Right, let's put it. There will be
Speaker 1: a trial, and when that trial ends, senators will have
Speaker 1: to decide if they believe Donald John Donald John Trump
Speaker 1: incited the erection insurrection against the United States. This is
Speaker 1: not okay, did Donald John Trump incite the erection? Okay?
Speaker 1: All right? Our two Sean Hannity showed gladual with US
Speaker 1: toll free telephone numbers eight hundred and nine four one. Sean,
Speaker 1: if you want to be a part of this extravaganza,
Speaker 1: I want to As we now head into what will
Speaker 1: be the second hypocritical shift show, let's see unconstitutional post
Speaker 1: presidency impeachment trial, if you want to call it hoax,
Speaker 1: it's all sides now are getting very skittish Democrats, so
Speaker 1: skittish Republicans now clearly are going to argue that it's
Speaker 1: not constitutional, can't happen, shouldn't happen, and nor do they
Speaker 1: want to give validity to the process of these radical democrats.
Speaker 1: And then on top of it, then we have other
Speaker 1: important issues here, like now we're beginning to know in
Speaker 1: the Washington Post and fake news CNN among others, are reporting, oh,
Speaker 1: a lot of this was planned. And here's the court
Speaker 1: filing which we talked about that shows that there was
Speaker 1: a plan in place, which then renders the impeachment article
Speaker 1: completely moot and contradicts it. That's why you don't have
Speaker 1: snap impeachments. And then just juxtapose all of this madness
Speaker 1: and these flagrant this flagrant hippocr see and double standard
Speaker 1: too well, in the final day of the administration of
Speaker 1: Donald Trump, be declassified and released documents explained why I
Speaker 1: didn't do it earlier. So we'll play the media Russia
Speaker 1: mash up, and then we'll play the president under explaining why,
Speaker 1: and then we'll talk to John Solomon and Greg Jarrett.
Speaker 1: You fall out tonight in the Russia investigation. Russian Russians,
Speaker 1: Russian Russians, Russians, Russia, Russia, Russia for Russia, Russia, Russian, Russian,
Speaker 1: Russia and Russia and Russia, the Russian, Russia, Russia, Russians,
Speaker 1: the Russian, Russia, Russia, Russians, Russia, Russia, the Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russians,
Speaker 1: the Russian, Russia and the Russia, the Russian, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia,
Speaker 1: Russian and Russian. No, but at the right time, we
Speaker 1: will be absolutely released. Again. I did the right thing
Speaker 1: by not doing it so far. But you understand they
Speaker 1: would call it something that it wouldn't be. It's the
Speaker 1: only time you'd be transparent where they'd say are bad
Speaker 1: things about transparency. And there was the President rightly saying
Speaker 1: what his lawyers were telling him, but also pointing out
Speaker 1: something that shouldn't be in America, because the truth is
Speaker 1: actually a real defense anyway. Greg Jarrett is with us,
Speaker 1: the host of the podcast The Brief and also two
Speaker 1: New York Times bestseller just thenews dot com editor in
Speaker 1: chief author of the bestseller fall Out John Solomon. John,
Speaker 1: lets you have more than anybody else been doing this
Speaker 1: dig deep, dig dive on the declassified information that we got,
Speaker 1: and you've really gone through every single page of it. Now,
Speaker 1: what have you found. Listen. I'm pretty certain Sean that
Speaker 1: when we're done, these will be the civil liberty and
Speaker 1: judicial integrity what the Pentagon Papers were to the Vietnam War.
Speaker 1: There is extraordinary revelations that not even the members of
Speaker 1: Congress who investigated this over the last three four years
Speaker 1: were aware of. As I start to call members who
Speaker 1: had access to this information when it's classified, some of
Speaker 1: the things didn't here, they didn't even know about. And
Speaker 1: I think, when you're done and you pull up thirty
Speaker 1: thousand feet, what are the big issues that are going
Speaker 1: to make Americans upset? It is clear that from the inning,
Speaker 1: I mean in July of twenty sixteen, the FBI and
Speaker 1: the CIA were aware and President Obama was aware that
Speaker 1: Hillary Clinton was in the process of carrying out a
Speaker 1: dirty trick to dirty up Donald Trump falsely on Russian
Speaker 1: because she was worried her email scandal was gonna bite
Speaker 1: her in the fall election. So that is one of
Speaker 1: the really clear things. The second thing is it is
Speaker 1: abundantly clear the FBI knew much of the evidence they
Speaker 1: were submitting to the courts and to Congress was distorted, wrong, debunked.
Speaker 1: And the third is we're going to see a lot
Speaker 1: more people expressing political bias than we saw. We've already
Speaker 1: seen the Smellie Walmart comments from Peter Struck and Lisa Pages,
Speaker 1: text messages, more and now we've learned from the declassification
Speaker 1: that we broke last week or this past week of
Speaker 1: Christopher Steele that his motive was he wanted to stop
Speaker 1: Trump from being president because it was bad for Great Britain.
Speaker 1: He wanted to help Hillary couldn't get over her email
Speaker 1: scandal distrack the country. You're going to find out other
Speaker 1: players in the process had made comments on official government
Speaker 1: documents and official text messages and official emails in tuning
Speaker 1: President Trump for the possibility that Trump could be president,
Speaker 1: all the way up to the top of the FBI.
Speaker 1: So what's higher than Struck and Page? These are remarkable.
Speaker 1: You have political bias, bad evidence, and a political dirty
Speaker 1: trick in the FBI helps carry it out for three
Speaker 1: years and sustain it. It's a really remarkable discovery. When
Speaker 1: all these documents are out, unbelievable and Greg Jared, obviously
Speaker 1: you've been pouring over them as well. You two bestsellers
Speaker 1: related to this whole thing, And boy, what a sad
Speaker 1: day when a president says, we can't be transparent and
Speaker 1: show you real documents that exist that are exculpatory to
Speaker 1: towards me, because the witch hunters and remember we had
Speaker 1: four separate investigations, would use it against them and claim
Speaker 1: somehow that is obstruction when the truth is supposed to
Speaker 1: be a defense at America, that's true. And there's so
Speaker 1: many shocking revel elations, Sean, and these long classified FBI
Speaker 1: documents no wonder James Comey, Andrew and Kay Peter struck
Speaker 1: in others never wanted you to see them, and the
Speaker 1: current FBI director, Christopher Ray fought like how to prevent
Speaker 1: their release and cover it all up. A Trump in
Speaker 1: the end, at the end of his administration would have
Speaker 1: none of it, and he essentially told Ray and the
Speaker 1: FBI to stuff it. You're not going to be able
Speaker 1: to deceive Americans about how your agency, the FBI, politicized
Speaker 1: law enforcement and weaponized your investigative powers to destroy a presidency.
Speaker 1: And thankfully, you know John Durham has certainly was the
Speaker 1: first have access to these documents and the evil just
Speaker 1: named him. My judgment should be behind bars. But you
Speaker 1: know Durham has meticulously been gathering the incriminating evidence, and
Speaker 1: I'm pretty confident that there will be indicts soon to
Speaker 1: follow because these documents that John has identified, I've gone through.
Speaker 1: I had a podcast that came out today on this.
Speaker 1: I mean, they are such a smoking gun of criminality
Speaker 1: that I think it's inevitable that some people will be
Speaker 1: prosecuted for their abuse of power and engaged in criminal acts.
Speaker 1: Let me go to fake news CNN and a Washington Post. Now,
Speaker 1: this is why you don't have snap impeachments. All of
Speaker 1: us agree, and the mob is and the Democrats insurrection
Speaker 1: that the president's language incited what happened at the Capitol
Speaker 1: on the six The president's words contradict that many of
Speaker 1: you will peacefully and patriotically march to the Capitol so
Speaker 1: your voices may be heard. They have fake news CNN.
Speaker 1: Evidence uncovered so far, including weapons and tactus scene on
Speaker 1: surveillance video, suggest a level of planning that has led
Speaker 1: investigators to believe that the attack on the Capitol was
Speaker 1: not just the protest that spiraled out of control, according
Speaker 1: to federal law enforcement officials, and now, by the way,
Speaker 1: court documents and the fbis examined in an indications that
Speaker 1: some participants at the Trump rally outside the White House
Speaker 1: left the event early to retrieve items to be used
Speaker 1: on the assault on the Capitol. Now go to the
Speaker 1: Washington Post. They talk about self styled militia members from Virginia,
Speaker 1: Ohio and other states. They made plans to storm the
Speaker 1: Capitol days in advance of the January sixth attack, and
Speaker 1: then communicated in real time as they breached the building
Speaker 1: on opposite sides and talked about hunting for lawmakers. You
Speaker 1: know my whole point, we need an nine eleven commission.
Speaker 1: But putting that aside, authorities have charged more than a
Speaker 1: hundred individuals and new allegations against three US military veterans, etc. Etc.
Speaker 1: And apparently there were plans made a degree of preparation
Speaker 1: and determination to rush deep into the halls and tunnels
Speaker 1: of Congress to make citizens arrest of elected officials. Now,
Speaker 1: Greg Jarrett, from a legal perspective, now that you look
Speaker 1: at the article of impeachment, does that not contradicts? Can
Speaker 1: you even say that the reports on CNN and in
Speaker 1: the Washington Post basically are exculpatory to the charge that
Speaker 1: the president and cited a spontaneous insurrection at the Capitol.
Speaker 1: If it was all planned in advance, that's right. And
Speaker 1: the key word there is spontaneous and imminent. That's the
Speaker 1: definition of incitement. It has to be words that are
Speaker 1: very specific that direct imminent acts of violence. And hear you.
Speaker 1: First of all, the president's wars didn't do that, as
Speaker 1: you point out, peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard,
Speaker 1: not take action, but make your voices heard and do
Speaker 1: it peacefully. The second of all, the president didn't incite
Speaker 1: something which was pre planned. That's an impossibility. So that
Speaker 1: will si be part of the defense. And also the
Speaker 1: fact that private citizen is not subject to an impeachment trial,
Speaker 1: because under the constitution, removal from office is the primary
Speaker 1: purpose of impeachment. Trump is no longer in office, and
Speaker 1: therefore this is invalid and unconstitutional. Someone said, well, we
Speaker 1: want to prevent him from holding further office. That under
Speaker 1: the Constitution is a secondary purpose that can only happen
Speaker 1: after the Senate decides unremoval. But if the president is
Speaker 1: no longer president not subject your removal, that too is
Speaker 1: constitutionally invalid. John Solomon. When you look at those reports
Speaker 1: and then you compare it to the impeachment article the
Speaker 1: snap impeachment boy, and then the commentary on these networks
Speaker 1: they're they're like ignoring their own quote news reports. Well,
Speaker 1: we've seen this show before, right. One of the things
Speaker 1: we're going to see next week, Sean and the documents
Speaker 1: I'm going to release, is the FBI monitoring the most
Speaker 1: hysterical stories in the Washington Post, the New York Times,
Speaker 1: in CNN during Russia and in real time saying they
Speaker 1: are way off, they don't know anything, They're wrong about
Speaker 1: everything on this They're making a mockery of journalism. That's
Speaker 1: what Peter Struck and Lisa Page and others, and Andy
Speaker 1: McCabe we're talking about. Behind the scenes, when America gets
Speaker 1: to see how stupid the FBI thought the news media
Speaker 1: was and pushing the Russia collusion narrative, we ought to
Speaker 1: go back and say, well, they did it in Ukraine.
Speaker 1: Remember it was a bad phone call, until it wasn't
Speaker 1: a bad phone call, and they did it in the Capitol.
Speaker 1: They immediately jumped to the conclusion that Trump incited this riot,
Speaker 1: and now as the evidence comes out that the riot
Speaker 1: was underway before a speech ended, the planning goes all
Speaker 1: the way back to late December according to some of
Speaker 1: these court documents, they're going to be embarrassed again. The
Speaker 1: problem with impeachments lately, they've been relying on a bad
Speaker 1: news medium. The news media are co conspirators in these
Speaker 1: drive by impeachments. I mean, it's really unbelievable if you
Speaker 1: really take the same standards applied by the Democrats Greig Jarrett,
Speaker 1: and we apply it to the quid pro quo with
Speaker 1: zero experience. Hunter, Well, that's the first impeachment. If you
Speaker 1: look at the rhetoric of Chuck Schumer and Nancy Pelosi
Speaker 1: coursage Kavanaugh, We're coming to get you, and so on
Speaker 1: and so forth, and and Joe Biden I want to
Speaker 1: take I want to beat the hell out of him
Speaker 1: in the back of the gym. That's the president, or
Speaker 1: Kamala Harris. You know, two weeks after Minneapolis and the
Speaker 1: police precinct burned to the ground and rioting going on.
Speaker 1: It's not going to stop. We're not going to stop.
Speaker 1: They shouldn't stop. We shouldn't stop. And I can go
Speaker 1: on from there. And then you've got you know, so
Speaker 1: many Maxine Waters, you know, getting their faces. I'll take
Speaker 1: I'm gonna take Donald Trump out tonight. Yeah, you know,
Speaker 1: matching waters inflammatory speech to people, encouraging them to essentially
Speaker 1: attack anybody who works for Donald Trump is far closer
Speaker 1: to incitement than what the President said on the Nation's
Speaker 1: mall on January sixth. But there's a huge difference shown
Speaker 1: between rousing passions in a speech before demonstrators and marchers,
Speaker 1: which all politicians do at some point in time, and
Speaker 1: inciting specific and imminent violence or destruction of property. And
Speaker 1: so Jonah's right, this is a drive by impeachment. I
Speaker 1: compared it to sort of instant rice. You know, they
Speaker 1: did it without any evidence. And the most egregious part
Speaker 1: of it all is that they abandoned a fundamental right
Speaker 1: to due process, which the House of Representatives created for
Speaker 1: all impeachments, and they've simply thrown it out the window.
Speaker 1: They abandoned their own rules. They're supposed but this is
Speaker 1: the new all right? If this STA Republicans will have
Speaker 1: their shot too. At the insanity last question, John, I
Speaker 1: know you're following the story about how as the hours
Speaker 1: after Joe Biden gives his Unity Unity Unity inaugural address,
Speaker 1: they began a politically a charged attack on who is
Speaker 1: a highly respected newly appointed career intelligence official over fears
Speaker 1: he would be insufficiently loyal to Democratic partisans. This guy
Speaker 1: actually worked for Adam Schiff. And you know, I know,
Speaker 1: you know it's NSA placed General Counsel Michael Ellis on
Speaker 1: administrative leave because they don't like this guy. No specified
Speaker 1: claim of mishandling classified information seems totally manufactured from the
Speaker 1: sources I've talked to. What are you hearing? And he's
Speaker 1: a trained classification official as a military officer and civilian. Well,
Speaker 1: it's kind of funny. The tables have been turned. Remember
Speaker 1: when as in Trump was trying to get rid of
Speaker 1: people that Democrats were angry and upset in calling it,
Speaker 1: you know, a witch hunt in an enemy's list, and
Speaker 1: the Democrats were and the Republicans saying, listen and everybody
Speaker 1: serves at the pleasure of president. President gets to serve
Speaker 1: really wants. The tables have been flipped, and now the
Speaker 1: Democrats are on. There were the victims and in the
Speaker 1: president Biden has the right to remove. Some of the
Speaker 1: truth of matter is all presidents have the right to
Speaker 1: have who they want to serve. The character assassination of
Speaker 1: Michaelis is not warranted by if you don't want it
Speaker 1: to serve to say, listen, I want my own guy there.
Speaker 1: But this is a career guy who had impeccable credentials.
Speaker 1: He doesn't deserve the political torture that he's being put through.
Speaker 1: What we do in Washington now is, rather than just
Speaker 1: say the obvious the president can have, we have the
Speaker 1: character destroy people to justify a president's actions. We had
Speaker 1: to just go back from real life. The president had
Speaker 1: the right to do this. Let's stop ruining good people's reputations. Well,
Speaker 1: we're going to stay on that story and get into
Speaker 1: it more deeply as time allows. John Solomon, thank you, Greg, Jared,
Speaker 1: thank you. All right, twenty five till the top of
Speaker 1: the hour. You know, it's fascinating because Joe Biden's campaign
Speaker 1: was to hide in the basement with the help of
Speaker 1: the mob, big tech, no vetting, no scrutiny whatsoever, and
Speaker 1: scared the living hell out of people about COVID. We're
Speaker 1: giving about about a million doses a day, and by
Speaker 1: the way, ongoing battle. I said, when my number comes,
Speaker 1: I would not ask to get ahead of the line.
Speaker 1: As you know, people just think the worst of people.
Speaker 1: I don't know anyway, I would take it. Half my
Speaker 1: friends think I'm nuts. The other half agree with me.
Speaker 1: Linda thinks I'm nuts, and I won't even tell you
Speaker 1: the rest of what she says. But anyway, this was
Speaker 1: his whole thing. We're gonna give away, We're gonna have
Speaker 1: a million doses a day, one hundred million and one
Speaker 1: hundred days. Well, Trump's already been doing a million a
Speaker 1: day at operation warp speed. We're even getting more more
Speaker 1: vaccines online. There's different versions of the vaccine. But anyway,
Speaker 1: as one hundred and ninety eight page government and spared
Speaker 1: no effort to ensure Americans can get vaccinated quickly and equitably.
Speaker 1: That's when he got asked the one question yesterday about it.
Speaker 1: Give me a break. Come on, man, you're a junkie.
Speaker 1: Come on, man, you're a junkie. Anyway, one hundred million vaccines,
Speaker 1: and that's what as Betsy McCoy said, you know, Trump's
Speaker 1: already doing. She actually thinks you need one point eight
Speaker 1: million people vaccinated a day to have her immunity. But
Speaker 1: that's a separate issue. But well, it's a it's a goal,
Speaker 1: it's not a it's not an edged in stone. Well,
Speaker 1: I thought That's what was their main promise. Now the
Speaker 1: latest talking point from liberals and the Democrats is, well,
Speaker 1: we're starting from scratch. Listen to this. The sun not
Speaker 1: even up on the first full day of the Biden administration,
Speaker 1: and already we have breaking news. As President Biden wakes
Speaker 1: up for the first time in the White House, we're
Speaker 1: getting war from officials about the staggering lack of a
Speaker 1: coronavirus vaccination plan left behind. This morning, we are told
Speaker 1: they have to start from scratch. One source says the
Speaker 1: Biden team are quote going to have to build everything
Speaker 1: from scratch. One source telling CNN, as you said, there
Speaker 1: is nothing for us to rework. We are going to
Speaker 1: have to build everything from scratch. As we hear that
Speaker 1: Biden today has to start from scratch, Biden sources tell
Speaker 1: CNN that the Trump administration essentially had no comprehensive distribution
Speaker 1: strategy at all. So the Biden team says they will
Speaker 1: have to start from square one and quote from scratch,
Speaker 1: so much worse than we could have imagined. That is
Speaker 1: how the new White House coronavirus coordinator Jeff Ziens, as
Speaker 1: Jeremy was pointing out, is describing what his team is
Speaker 1: inheriting from the Trump administration. Sources are describing it to
Speaker 1: CNN this way, that there's not a single vaccine distribution
Speaker 1: plan to speak of from the Trump administration. One Biden
Speaker 1: official telling CNN quote, we are going to have to
Speaker 1: build everything from scratch, so there was no plan striking
Speaker 1: news this. More sources tell CNN the President Biden's team
Speaker 1: will begin a vaccine rollout plan from scratch. Sources say
Speaker 1: the coronavirus vaccine distribution plan that was inherited by from
Speaker 1: the Trump administration to the Biden team was non existent.
Speaker 1: They're basically starting from scratch. They're starting from scratch as
Speaker 1: it relates to the the vaccine distribution. Okay, anyway, Faucci addressed
Speaker 1: the talking point, which is starting from scratch even though
Speaker 1: we now know liberal. Fauci said, this another thing that
Speaker 1: I don't buy comes out of our reporting. I have
Speaker 1: two new pieces of reporting. The first one is that
Speaker 1: people within the administration say they're starting from scratch with
Speaker 1: a vaccine. No, they're not. You have an infrastructure out
Speaker 1: there that you're well aware of. It has to be improved.
Speaker 1: But they shouldn't get any benefit of a low bar
Speaker 1: here either. You know, there's a lot going on already.
Speaker 1: Are they going to scrap it or are they going
Speaker 1: to build on it make it better? No, No, they're
Speaker 1: not going to scrap it, Chris, They're going to I
Speaker 1: mean I was involved in the development of that stuff.
Speaker 1: They were not going to scrap that. There are a
Speaker 1: lot of good things that when that happened, with the
Speaker 1: development of the vaccine program and an operation Warp Speed
Speaker 1: had a lot of successes. There were some missteps, but
Speaker 1: a lot of successes there. Now we're going to be
Speaker 1: building on things. We're not going to be destroying it,
Speaker 1: putting aside, saying it's useless. We're going to take the
Speaker 1: good parts and amplify them, make them better, and we're
Speaker 1: going to go for the goal, and that is to
Speaker 1: get as many people vaccinated as you possibly can, as
Speaker 1: expetitiously as you can. That's the goal. We're not going
Speaker 1: to trash anything. Peter Doocey of Fox News asked, well,
Speaker 1: why didn't he follow his mask mandate when I was
Speaker 1: at the Link of Memorial. Well, apparently, I guess he
Speaker 1: has bigger things to worry about. And remember the fast
Speaker 1: the face masks rule is on federal property, and they
Speaker 1: ditched it when they went to the link of Memorial
Speaker 1: and when I asked a question about it, well, he
Speaker 1: was celebrating it was a historic day in our country,
Speaker 1: all right. Joining us now to respond to this and
Speaker 1: the other issues of the day. The Reverend cl Bryant,
Speaker 1: he's the author of the Race for Freedom and senior
Speaker 1: fellow Freedom Works and cl Reverend, welcome back to the program.
Speaker 1: I hope, I hope you're keeping me in your prayers.
Speaker 1: I hope you're keeping this great country in your prayers
Speaker 1: because we need a little of both. Both of us
Speaker 1: need it absolutely, Sean, and you certainly in my prayers.
Speaker 1: And our nation is always in our prayers, as well
Speaker 1: as our President Donald John Trump, even though he is
Speaker 1: in exile at this time. But this is what I
Speaker 1: say about that, Sean. The lies, innuendos, and the hypocrisy
Speaker 1: that has come from Joe Biden will continue for forty
Speaker 1: six years, most of our lifetime. Sean, do you realize
Speaker 1: Joe Biden hasn't done anything notable on his own in
Speaker 1: forty six years in Washington, d C. Except right on
Speaker 1: the coattails of those who could use him. And he's
Speaker 1: being used as a Patsy as a pond now and
Speaker 1: the lies and the plagiarism and everything that he's been
Speaker 1: known for in the past should come to bear in
Speaker 1: our president here in America, now that he's been actually
Speaker 1: given the oath of office to sit in behind the
Speaker 1: desk of the President. That is one thing, Sean, that
Speaker 1: I believe that we as Americans must understand that we
Speaker 1: are on our way back to Obama Land with Joe
Speaker 1: Biden and this crew of people that he has brought
Speaker 1: to Washington, DC, and Americans need to understand if they
Speaker 1: need to stand up and still be heard, that's not
Speaker 1: inciting riots or anything of that nature. And I'm certain
Speaker 1: to tell you that the President did not incite anything. Well,
Speaker 1: I mean we now know the Washington Times and even
Speaker 1: fake news CNN all investigators now looking deeply at the
Speaker 1: reality and the possibility that I remember this was the
Speaker 1: whole impeachment deal that the president's words incited this, Well, no,
Speaker 1: it's actually turning quite differently, you know. And they published
Speaker 1: an article in the Washington Post on I think it
Speaker 1: was Tuesday, the day before the inauguration. Self style militia
Speaker 1: members planned on storming the Capitol days in advance of
Speaker 1: the January sixth attack, court documents say, and it goes
Speaker 1: on to say self style militia members from Virginia, Ohio
Speaker 1: and other states made plans to storm the capitol. Now
Speaker 1: the President said that many of you will peacefully, patriotically
Speaker 1: march to the Capitol so your voices may be heard.
Speaker 1: I'm not sure how that's inciting an insurrection, but does
Speaker 1: it not debunk the narrative within the impeachment articles the Democrats,
Speaker 1: the mob in the media that in fact the words
Speaker 1: incited the insurrection if it was well planned in advance.
Speaker 1: And now even these fake news networks are reporting it themselves,
Speaker 1: although they still go along with the impeachment madness, it
Speaker 1: absolutely debunks at Sean and I have to say this
Speaker 1: to all of us who consider ourselves conservatives. You and
Speaker 1: I have known each other a lot of years now,
Speaker 1: and I'm a conservative just like you are. I happen
Speaker 1: to vote Republican. But I'm saying this to the Republican
Speaker 1: Party that I've been loyal to for the last twenty
Speaker 1: five years. If in fact they do not stand with
Speaker 1: this president against this phony, fallacious impeachment charge, they are
Speaker 1: going to find themselves on a desert island by themselves,
Speaker 1: the people who put them where they have been, and
Speaker 1: they squandered it. They squandered everything that we have given
Speaker 1: to them as grassroots workers and grassroots people. And if
Speaker 1: they do not stand with this president, we're going to
Speaker 1: see something in this country we hadn't seen a long time,
Speaker 1: and that is the rise of something else replacing those
Speaker 1: do nothing Republicans that are now in the minority. I
Speaker 1: have no doubt, you know, if given a choice, Conservatives,
Speaker 1: let's see America first. The Trump agenda, which by the way,
Speaker 1: is very simple, as I've outlined all this week on
Speaker 1: this program, versus weak Republicanism, establishment Republicanism. They're not going
Speaker 1: to win over eighty percent of the Republican Party and
Speaker 1: that is a risk that they're never going to take.
Speaker 1: That's why I'm not sitting here wringing my hands at
Speaker 1: all worried about this phony impeachment. The other thing is
Speaker 1: my sources are very clear cl is that Democrats are
Speaker 1: extremely skittish about this. They know that it defies their
Speaker 1: unity meeting. They also know that investigators are now saying
Speaker 1: they believe they found the organizers of this thing, and
Speaker 1: they're getting more information every day. Nor do they want
Speaker 1: to validate the process, which was no process in the
Speaker 1: House of Representatives, so they don't want any part of it,
Speaker 1: and Republicans want no part of it either. I do
Speaker 1: think there'll be an early motion to dismiss it. It's
Speaker 1: got a shot, and if it doesn't pass, they'll spend
Speaker 1: two three days and this thing's over. There'll quit by
Speaker 1: the overwhelming majority of Republicans for sure. Most likely You're
Speaker 1: absolutely right, because they see the common sense the Republicans
Speaker 1: need Donald John Trump, and the Democrats, of course, are terrified.
Speaker 1: They are absolutely terrified of Donald John Trump. Why because
Speaker 1: he did more legitimately for this nation in three and
Speaker 1: a half years than Joe Biden has done in your lifetime.
Speaker 1: In my lifetime, Sean, I have to reiterate, in our lifetime,
Speaker 1: I was a teenager when Joe Biden went to Washington.
Speaker 1: You were probably about eight years old. But let me
Speaker 1: tell you something. In our lifetime, Sean, this man is
Speaker 1: the best example as to why we need term limit
Speaker 1: in Washington at this point in time. Listen. I've always
Speaker 1: said it's a bad idea whose time, unfortunate is come.
Speaker 1: I would like, but the problem is is all these guys,
Speaker 1: they they all of a sudden they become enthralled with
Speaker 1: being called senator, congressman, governeah, you know, and they like it.
Speaker 1: And then all of a sudden they might go there
Speaker 1: with the purest of intentions. And I've seen Ben's sass.
Speaker 1: The ass is an imperfect example. I mean, we listen
Speaker 1: to this guy, Linda, right, we promoted him, we helped him,
Speaker 1: and I mean he just went off the rails and
Speaker 1: he I think he forgot where he came from, and um,
Speaker 1: you know, forgot who he was. And I think he
Speaker 1: likes he's kind of enamored with his own power, and
Speaker 1: he's not that remarkable in my mind, not remarkable at all.
Speaker 1: But Sean, I'd like to put the focus as well,
Speaker 1: what happened to Joe's little boy Hunter? What happens to him?
Speaker 1: What happens to that that that that that collusion with
Speaker 1: with all of the Chinese and all the what happened
Speaker 1: to that? What happens to Joe? I don't know if
Speaker 1: you heard the repair shop owner on my TV show
Speaker 1: last night, we taped it just before the show. Where
Speaker 1: do you hear the stuff tonight about videos on this laptop.
Speaker 1: Nobody else has talked about it, and Sean, I saw
Speaker 1: part one. I can't wait to see part two telling
Speaker 1: all of America. Tune into Handy tonight and let's see
Speaker 1: what this is. What he's talking about here. And you
Speaker 1: have stood on the front line. You've never wavered, and
Speaker 1: I certainly do appreciate your friendship. Listen, see, Oh you're
Speaker 1: a special guy. You're you love this country, you and
Speaker 1: still good values. You remind us that you know the
Speaker 1: important things of life, our spiritual side. And you know,
Speaker 1: I know a lot of people have been really struggling
Speaker 1: the last year, and I think guys like you that
Speaker 1: that help people in troubled times are just a voice
Speaker 1: in the wilderness and much needed. Thank you, sir, God
Speaker 1: bless you man. Talk to you too. Appreciate it. Thank you, Reverend.
Speaker 1: All right, as we roll along, eight hundred nine fold one,
Speaker 1: Sean toll free telephone number. You know if you missed
Speaker 1: it earlier. Now, what did I tell you before this election?
Speaker 1: Everything's on the table, Chucky Schumer said, Right, what did
Speaker 1: I say? What did that mean? We're going to end
Speaker 1: the legislative filibuster? Well, Chuck Schumer wouldn't make a deal
Speaker 1: to stop that yesterday. Okay, check, they're going to move
Speaker 1: forward with that. What did I say, DC? Maybe Puerto
Speaker 1: Rico as well? Statehood? Anyone in the mob the media
Speaker 1: ever asked Biden about these issues. No, because they were
Speaker 1: protecting him. He was in the media mob, big tech
Speaker 1: liberal Democrat protection program, and they all went out there.
Speaker 1: They let him hide in the basement, didn't have to
Speaker 1: answer any questions. And now we have the Biden camp.
Speaker 1: White House Press Secretary Jensaki confirming that President Biden does
Speaker 1: support statehood for the District of Columbia's the fifty first state,
Speaker 1: while refusing to offer a timeline. DC statehood was an
Speaker 1: issue that was raised in previous press briefings. The President
Speaker 1: has supported DC statehood in the past. That certainly remains
Speaker 1: his position, but I don't have any information on a timeline.
Speaker 1: Well what does that mean? Well, if you add DC,
Speaker 1: you got two more Democratic Senate seats. If you add
Speaker 1: Puerto Rico, they think you get two more Democratic seats
Speaker 1: in both places in perpetuity as far as the eye
Speaker 1: can see. What would that mean now would be a
Speaker 1: permanent majority for Democrats, at least in their minds. Now,
Speaker 1: these are the things we warned you about. How far
Speaker 1: does it go from here? In other words, do we
Speaker 1: get to the point where, well, maybe we'll end the
Speaker 1: electoral college and let in New York, in California, New Jersey,
Speaker 1: and Illinois decide every election. Is that well, Chuck says,
Speaker 1: everything's on the table. Told you I tried my hardest
Speaker 1: to warn everybody. Now, what are the What can the
Speaker 1: Republicans do about it? I don't know at this time.
Speaker 1: We'll continue all right, news round up, information, overload our
Speaker 1: You know, I got criticized for saying yesterday it's been
Speaker 1: a disastrous week. Masters well, I guess good if you're
Speaker 1: a liberal Democrat and a radical socialist. But I've been
Speaker 1: also going looking at the impact of these insane policies
Speaker 1: and what it means for we, the American people. And
Speaker 1: that's where things that's where things kind of go off
Speaker 1: the rails for Joe Biden, because it's not going to
Speaker 1: end well for him in the end. In terms of
Speaker 1: once the American people understand the depth of this radical
Speaker 1: agenda and the impact directly on them, then I think
Speaker 1: the country is going to say, are you kidding me?
Speaker 1: By the way, there is a Rassmusem polled double digit margin.
Speaker 1: Voters opposed Biden's decision blocking the Keystone XL pipeline. Voters
Speaker 1: were a little shocked to see the change of names
Speaker 1: immediately to the ambassador US ambassador at Israel on the
Speaker 1: Twitter account, in other words, to include the West Bank
Speaker 1: and Gaza. H. That was a that was a message
Speaker 1: to Israel on day one, UH, the devastating economic impact
Speaker 1: and jobs impact on the country by rejoining the insane
Speaker 1: Paris Climate Accord, which by the way, countries like China
Speaker 1: don't have to abide by. Then of course the disastrous
Speaker 1: rollout of what is you know, I think a big
Speaker 1: deal of the vaccine. Then of course open borders as yes,
Speaker 1: we now have another caravan coming, and the plan to
Speaker 1: stop building the wall, and a path towards UH legalization.
Speaker 1: They're going to legalize those illegal immigrants. Never mind the
Speaker 1: Caesar Chavez bust taking over for Winston Churchill's a side
Speaker 1: note of nothing. Um. So you know, if you look
Speaker 1: at this and you listen to the media and the
Speaker 1: mob and what do you mean, Hannity, this has been
Speaker 1: a great week. That's because you agree with this insanity.
Speaker 1: But I'm going to tell you something, all of these
Speaker 1: moves Paris Agreement, Keystone Pipeline, open borders, amnesty, all of
Speaker 1: it together, I am telling you right now, is going
Speaker 1: to end up in Americans losing jobs, lower wages, and
Speaker 1: it's it's going to be a huge financial burden in
Speaker 1: terms of the travel, in terms of the Paris Accords,
Speaker 1: We're talking about billions of dollars. I mean, this is
Speaker 1: a disaster um and I just can't believe this is
Speaker 1: where they're taking the country. Now, we have Biden and
Speaker 1: Kamala wanting to end fracking. If you look at all
Speaker 1: the jobs that ultimately will be lost, it's a massive number.
Speaker 1: Never said I, you said tape. I did show the tape.
Speaker 1: Put it on your website. Put it on put it
Speaker 1: on the website. Would there be any place for fossil fuels,
Speaker 1: including coal and fracking in a Biden administration. No, we would,
Speaker 1: We would work it out, we would make sure it's eliminated.
Speaker 1: I guarantee you we're gonna end fossil fuel, no more,
Speaker 1: no new fraki I gradually move away from frackie and
Speaker 1: I think it's critically important on day one that we
Speaker 1: end any fossil fuel leases on public LANs, Like, what
Speaker 1: about they want to do the same thing I want
Speaker 1: to do. They want to phase out fossil fuels, and
Speaker 1: we're gonna phase out fossil There's no question I'm in
Speaker 1: favor of banning fracking, all right. Joining us now Daniel Turner,
Speaker 1: founder executive director of Power the Future, outlining this big,
Speaker 1: massive mistake getting away from energy and dependence and the
Speaker 1: Keystone Excel pipeline. You know, Okay, uh, these radical green
Speaker 1: groups and the Powers accords. Uh. Now, this article about
Speaker 1: me just takes me to Hannity says the Disaster Week.
Speaker 1: What is he talking about? I'm like, Yeah, if I
Speaker 1: worked for the Keystone Xcel pipeline, I think I'd be
Speaker 1: a little ticked off anyway, Daniel, thank you for being
Speaker 1: with us. Thank you for having me on SUN and
Speaker 1: also with a Steve Moore, economists, author of Trump Anonomics,
Speaker 1: Inside the America First Planner, Revive Our Economy. Daniel, you
Speaker 1: said something that really fascinated. He said, what's fascinating about
Speaker 1: the Keystone is how unfascinating the project actually is. And
Speaker 1: you talked about its marvel of engineering, an extraordinary accomplishment
Speaker 1: of human mechanical skill, twelve hundred mile pipeline from Alberta,
Speaker 1: Canada to the Gulf Coast carrying crew to be refined.
Speaker 1: An incredible infrastructure project that created a lot of jobs. Now,
Speaker 1: I know, you know Biden's claiming, oh, there's going to
Speaker 1: be very few jobs that are lost here in Pete
Speaker 1: Buddhajad say no, these jobs, you know, we want them
Speaker 1: replaced with good union jobs. It's easy for him to
Speaker 1: say he just got a new job. Yeah. It is
Speaker 1: remarkable to see the lack of empathy that Joe Biden
Speaker 1: and Pete Buddha Judge have showed for the thousands of
Speaker 1: people who have lost their jobs overnight. Right there are
Speaker 1: married couples right now who are figuring out how to
Speaker 1: move forward because they have lost their sole source of employment.
Speaker 1: And they're in these red states states like moved Nebraska
Speaker 1: and the Dakotas, states that Joe Biden quite frankly doesn't
Speaker 1: care about it and would only visit if he needed
Speaker 1: their electoral votes. Mayor Pete said the priority is fulfilling
Speaker 1: the president's promise on climate change. There is a plan
Speaker 1: for the Guatemalan immigrants who were crossing the border. There
Speaker 1: is a plan for everybody, But there is no plan
Speaker 1: for these thousands of American energy workers who are losing
Speaker 1: their job. They are just told to go pound sand
Speaker 1: and that is absolutely immoral that this president is doing
Speaker 1: that to these people. And by the way, the estimates are,
Speaker 1: you know, thousands of temporary jobs, additional jobs directly in
Speaker 1: indirect jobs associated with it, about two billion dollars in wages.
Speaker 1: We're talking about Stephen Moore. I even noticed the Canadians.
Speaker 1: It was a Bloomberg piece out today that the leader
Speaker 1: of Canada's oil heartland calling this decision to cancel Keystone
Speaker 1: Excel an insult. They're urging the Prime Minister Trudeau to
Speaker 1: consider retaliation in this case. And anyway, their premier, Jason
Speaker 1: Kennedy said in a press conference, it's an insult, and
Speaker 1: said Trudeau she can demand the US administration sit down
Speaker 1: and discuss the project in the context of environmental climate
Speaker 1: security policy and if that fails, Canada should be willing
Speaker 1: to impose meaningful punitive measures against his biggest trading partner. Well,
Speaker 1: we can see they're reasserting their muscle against America. Well,
Speaker 1: you know, Sean was struck by that quote from the
Speaker 1: Biden administration saying what we want is good paying union jobs.
Speaker 1: That's exactly what these are. You know, I've spent a
Speaker 1: lot of time in the old patch in the United
Speaker 1: States and the Dakotas and Texas and even up in Canada,
Speaker 1: and these are not fifteen dollars an hour jobs. These
Speaker 1: aren't fifteen dollars jobs. These are jobs to pay, you know,
Speaker 1: for the truckers, the pipe fitters, the construction workers. They're
Speaker 1: hard at jobs that pay many times over one hundred
Speaker 1: thousand dollars a year. So these are exactly the kind
Speaker 1: of uh, you know, good paying union jobs that Biden
Speaker 1: promised that he would create rather than take away. By
Speaker 1: the way, shame, I'm you know some of these unions,
Speaker 1: if unions actually endorsed Biden, did you know that chun?
Speaker 1: I mean, is that? How crazy is that? I mean,
Speaker 1: I mean the Cavalier basically it was. It was Buddha,
Speaker 1: Judge and Biden to to workers on Keystone XL drop dead.
Speaker 1: I mean, this just don't care. And when you think
Speaker 1: about our relationship with Canada, they pretty much told Canada
Speaker 1: to shove it and that's going to impact their economy.
Speaker 1: But he's giving into the environmental extremists, as we all
Speaker 1: said he would. What is the impact of the Climate accords,
Speaker 1: the Plan Paris Climate Accord, which actually says that China
Speaker 1: is a developing nation. They don't put the same restrictions
Speaker 1: on China, the biggest polluter. And it is remarkable that
Speaker 1: China is exempt from this. And what the United States
Speaker 1: has done under this administration has surpassed the goals of
Speaker 1: the Climate Accords without being in it under the Trump administration.
Speaker 1: So now that we are joining it for no apparent reason,
Speaker 1: we're also on the hook now for billions of dollars
Speaker 1: that will go to a UN climate slush fund. Who
Speaker 1: was who was spending this money? What are their projects?
Speaker 1: What oversight is there? Do I trust the UN with
Speaker 1: billions of taxpayer American dollars? So again it's this globalist
Speaker 1: cabal that punishes America, will impose false functions of false
Speaker 1: mandates on America. When we've achieved the spirit of the accords,
Speaker 1: which is lower our missions. We did that under President
Speaker 1: Frump and that was never celebrated by the environmental left. Well, sorry,
Speaker 1: it's just going to make another point. You know, you
Speaker 1: talk about Canada being a you know, loser here, clearly
Speaker 1: they are because Canada, Yeah, the United State, Canada, the
Speaker 1: United States have moral on gas and call than just
Speaker 1: about any other you know, region of the world. We
Speaker 1: have more than you know, Saudi Arabia. We have more
Speaker 1: of this than than Russia and all these other countries.
Speaker 1: But the big winner here from both United States entering
Speaker 1: the re entering the worst treaty in the history of
Speaker 1: the United States, the Paris Climate Accord, and uh IN
Speaker 1: discontinuing these infrastructure projects like the pipelines is right now,
Speaker 1: I mentioned this on your show, I think last month.
Speaker 1: Right now, as we're sitting here, there's a twelve billion
Speaker 1: dollar pipeline that's being built from Siberia and Russia to China.
Speaker 1: And so, I mean, what's wrong with this picture? Shoun
Speaker 1: So Russia and China are two big enemies. Are building
Speaker 1: a pipeline so they can get all of the energy
Speaker 1: that China needs at low prices, and we can't build
Speaker 1: pipelines here in the United States. Meanwhile, while they're doing pipelines,
Speaker 1: the other thing people have to realize is China right
Speaker 1: now is building we don't know exactly, but somewhere in
Speaker 1: the neighborhood of fifty to two hundred new coal plants.
Speaker 1: So every time we shut down a coal plant United States,
Speaker 1: China builds ten of them. How is that reducing climate change?
Speaker 1: I mean, that's such a great point. And by the way,
Speaker 1: have it our carbon emissions level has gone down in
Speaker 1: recent years way out. Wait. Wait, absolutely the countries that
Speaker 1: are in the that are in the you know, that
Speaker 1: are in the terst climate and none of them, by
Speaker 1: the way, of the thirty major countries they've been in
Speaker 1: that Climate Change of agreement, twenty eight of them haven't
Speaker 1: reached their targets. Yeah, and you're gonna say, Daniel, the
Speaker 1: remarkable thing about what President Trump achieved and got very
Speaker 1: little credit for on the global community, or especially in
Speaker 1: the environmental community, is lowering our missions while also making
Speaker 1: America the world's largest oil and gas producer. We did
Speaker 1: not discover any new oil field, We did not invent
Speaker 1: any new any new technology. What President Trump did is
Speaker 1: he allowed the free markets to do what it does best.
Speaker 1: That means that potential was always in America. First, every
Speaker 1: single president going back in history, all that potential of
Speaker 1: America was there, and they wouldn't let it come to
Speaker 1: the market. President from unleashed the power of the flea market,
Speaker 1: and it does what it always does, which is produced
Speaker 1: more for less while improving the status of the average person.
Speaker 1: I just I've found the statement of Buddha Judge in
Speaker 1: particular at this hearing with Ted Cruz. I mean it literally,
Speaker 1: I'm like, oh my gosh, you really don't care. I
Speaker 1: mean he put, he put. Look, if you're working, and
Speaker 1: we know that there are how many, how many millions
Speaker 1: of people that have been displaced in terms of jobs
Speaker 1: as a result of you know, rigid government shutdowns, especially
Speaker 1: in places like New York and California and elsewhere as
Speaker 1: a result of COVID nineteen. Okay, now we're gonna have
Speaker 1: illegal immigrants coming in and they're gonna they're gonna be
Speaker 1: made legal, and they'll be the their path to legalization.
Speaker 1: No more building the border wall, putting handcuffs on ice.
Speaker 1: They can't even do their job anymore. And the laws
Speaker 1: of the land, as per Biden. So we're gonna have
Speaker 1: more competition for the jobs that do become available, as
Speaker 1: hopefully one day we get to the point where the
Speaker 1: country opens up completely, maybe late spring and early summer.
Speaker 1: Steve Moore, Look, there is one constant theme of every
Speaker 1: single person who has been appointed to a high level
Speaker 1: job in the administration. You know what that is, shun.
Speaker 1: They are climate change fanatics. They care more about climate
Speaker 1: change than health of the American citizens and jobs and COVID.
Speaker 1: It's all climate change. So I am going to predict, Sean,
Speaker 1: this is the tip of the iceberg. You're going to
Speaker 1: see multiple more kinds of regulations like this on the
Speaker 1: American economy. And it is dan is right. These are
Speaker 1: these have very negative effects on America's ability to produce energy.
Speaker 1: And the big winners are our biggest enemies. And one
Speaker 1: other thing, Russia and China in particular, and countries that hey,
Speaker 1: those in the Middle East. Real quick. Yeah, look, people say, oh,
Speaker 1: we're not going to need oil anymore, We're gonna use
Speaker 1: electric cars. Okay, fine, maybe maybe twenty years from now,
Speaker 1: A bready going to have a testbot. How are you
Speaker 1: going to charge the batteries without natural gas, without electricity
Speaker 1: which comes from natural gas? And call, I mean, people
Speaker 1: don't even camp into this stuff out. Natural gas reduce
Speaker 1: this pollution, It doesn't increase pollution. That's why I need
Speaker 1: we need the pipelines. Well and everybody better get ready.
Speaker 1: Your heating bills are gonna sore, Your gas prices are
Speaker 1: gonna sore. It's inevitable. It's a simple supplied demand crisscross
Speaker 1: dictating price and we'll be artificially reducing the supply and
Speaker 1: that means you pay more, which is exactly what they want,
Speaker 1: which is said, all right, Steve Moore, thank you, Daniel Turner,
Speaker 1: thank you. All right, Martin and Florida. We have one
Speaker 1: minute this segment. Can you do it in a minute?
Speaker 1: Martin sean so great to speak with you. You are
Speaker 1: a great American to see. I'll alluded to. I'll get
Speaker 1: right to the point. There are seventy five million great
Speaker 1: Americans have voted for President Trump, not because they idolize
Speaker 1: a man, because they we're voting for the American ideal
Speaker 1: that he represented. He's a great president because he not
Speaker 1: only stood up for the American way, he led the way.
Speaker 1: He got things done. And imagine what he could have
Speaker 1: gotten done with the support of those on the other
Speaker 1: side of the aisle. It's a disgrace. My question to
Speaker 1: you is what sort of recourse does President Trump, former
Speaker 1: President Trump at this time have in the event that
Speaker 1: they botched this impeachment. Does he have legal recourse to
Speaker 1: really stick it in their faces on behalf of everybody
Speaker 1: that there, I think there's certainly Listen, there are enough
Speaker 1: constitutional scholars that have been very outspoken about the constitutionality
Speaker 1: of it. We don't want to get there because as
Speaker 1: we learned, I'll quote the chief Justice in Wisconsin that
Speaker 1: if you continued to be the other four justices on
Speaker 1: this court, he was three leading the dissent and don't
Speaker 1: deal with these issues. It's going to keep happening. It's
Speaker 1: not going to go away. And you can't have judicial
Speaker 1: show activism by inaction. This is a significant, serious constitutional challenge.
Speaker 1: Republicans in the Senate. They need to do their job,
Speaker 1: so we don't have to go to your plan. But
Speaker 1: you raised great points, Martin, and you did it in
Speaker 1: a minute. You're unbelievable. Quick break right back and we'll
Speaker 1: continue on the other side. Your calls coming up. We
Speaker 1: want to make sure that all those votes are counted,
Speaker 1: because at the end of the day, we know that
Speaker 1: we're all counted. Algor will be president United States of America.
Speaker 1: Since election day, we have had a single fundamental goal
Speaker 1: to ensure a complete count of all of the votes
Speaker 1: cast in Florida. What is its stake is more important
Speaker 1: than who wins the presidency. What is it stake is
Speaker 1: the integrity of our democracy. All we are asking for
Speaker 1: is that the rule of law be respected and upheld,
Speaker 1: and that all the votes be counted in a way
Speaker 1: that is consistent with Florida law. There is no question,
Speaker 1: a very little question, that al Gore won the votes
Speaker 1: cast in the state of Florida. The question is will
Speaker 1: he win of us counted? Do you think Donald Trump's
Speaker 1: win was legitimate election? Legit the election is by this intrusion,
Speaker 1: I don't see it. Is president elect as a legitimate president?
Speaker 1: You do not consider an a legitimate president. Does he
Speaker 1: think that Democrats should put this away? This whole idea
Speaker 1: of legitimate illegitimate president's not going to get in the
Speaker 1: middle of this right now. I get it, But you
Speaker 1: didn't answer the question is Donald Trump legitimate? I think
Speaker 1: there's a cloud of questions around what happened, clouds of questions,
Speaker 1: and we disagree on things. But but honestly, I mean
Speaker 1: yes or no? Is he the legitimately elected president United States?
Speaker 1: When he raises his hand, we're counting on our law
Speaker 1: enforcement community to get to the the bottom of these questions.
Speaker 1: He also won't. Do you agree with John Lewis? Do
Speaker 1: you agree that Donald Trump is in effect not a
Speaker 1: legitimate president. I think that there's no question that the
Speaker 1: process that elected him was not legitimate. Point elect, although
Speaker 1: legally elected, it is not legitimate for all the reason
Speaker 1: I think that Donald Trump will legitimate legitimacy question of
Speaker 1: the legitimacy questions come up. You say he will be
Speaker 1: president of the United States, but you're you're at least
Speaker 1: reluctant to say he will be the legitimate president of
Speaker 1: the United States. Is that right? He is going to
Speaker 1: be president, But isn't it more difficult now to work
Speaker 1: together when you've said flatly he's not even a legitimate president.
Speaker 1: I don't recognize this legitimacy. John Lewis said that you
Speaker 1: believe he's a legitimate president. Well, he was elected on
Speaker 1: the fact that Donald Trump can't stand out he's not
Speaker 1: a legitimate president that he can bear to tell him
Speaker 1: the truth. Now the legitimization of the presidency is taking
Speaker 1: hold within the country. Do you think it was a
Speaker 1: legitimate election. I think that there are lots of questions
Speaker 1: about its legitimacy. The twenty sixteen election wasn't legitimate. What
Speaker 1: does it mean to say it's not legitimate? He was
Speaker 1: not a legitimate election. But do you think it was
Speaker 1: a legitimate election? The time here Donal might question you
Speaker 1: this was it a legitimate election? Does it count? My
Speaker 1: personal view is that it was not a legitimate elect
Speaker 1: so it doesn't count. There you go. You hear it
Speaker 1: again and again and again. But you would think this
Speaker 1: is only the first time in the history of this
Speaker 1: country that people had a problem with election results. It's
Speaker 1: not sad, you know, with the United States of America.
Speaker 1: Do we have the ability to have a free, fair
Speaker 1: election that we can have integrity and confidence in the results?
Speaker 1: And yeah, of course we do. We send people to
Speaker 1: the moon and we bring them home. We do other
Speaker 1: amazing things as well. Can a system, such a system
Speaker 1: be designed, Yeah, I ken. But the hypocrisy is what
Speaker 1: this is all about. It is breathtaking, and this is
Speaker 1: you know, then you get to the Then you get
Speaker 1: to the rhetoric of the left, the rhetoric of Maxim Waters,
Speaker 1: the rhetoric of Chuck Schumer and Kamala Harris. I'm gonna
Speaker 1: take Trump out to night. The rhetoric of so many
Speaker 1: Democrats over the years. I'm gonna take them behind the
Speaker 1: jim beat the hell out of them. What if any
Speaker 1: Republican ever said that about Joel Um it wouldn't work
Speaker 1: very well, wouldn't go over. If you know when they're
Speaker 1: we're gonna fight. When they're down, we kick them. We
Speaker 1: kick them, but they go low, we kick them. Oh
Speaker 1: pretty amazing that ted Low. He promised and threatened widespread
Speaker 1: civil unrest if Trump fired Mueller. Look, if the President
Speaker 1: does go ahead and fire Robert Muller, we would have
Speaker 1: people take to the streets. I believe there would be
Speaker 1: widespread civil unrest because Americans understand that the rule of
Speaker 1: law is paramount. And you think there would be civil unrest,
Speaker 1: widespread civil unrest, I do, yeah, widespread, So I do,
Speaker 1: I do yeah. Cory Booker get up in the face
Speaker 1: of some congress people. Maxie would get in their face.
Speaker 1: Did not want it anywhere. Anytime you create a crowd, well,
Speaker 1: you can't be civil with the political party that wants
Speaker 1: to destroy what you stand for. Hillary Clinton Joaquin Castro
Speaker 1: twenty nineteen. Trump considering declaring a national emergency over the
Speaker 1: government shut down, said Democrats would fight him in those streets,
Speaker 1: and it goes on. You know, when you're in the arena,
Speaker 1: Nancy Pelosi said, you have to be ready to take
Speaker 1: a punch and throw a punch. John Tester, in order
Speaker 1: to take on Trump, you have to punch him in
Speaker 1: the face. Squad member Pressley, this is as much about
Speaker 1: public outcry, organizing, mobilizing, applying pressure, making phone calls, emails,
Speaker 1: showing up. You know, there needs to be unrest in
Speaker 1: the streets for as long as there's unrest in our lives.
Speaker 1: No pretty amazing list, isn't it. I don't hear Mitch
Speaker 1: McConnell never heard him at the time, you know, talking
Speaker 1: about that language provoking any things. And look at Kamala
Speaker 1: Harris's statements. You know this is you know, they're not
Speaker 1: going to stop. This is after what happened in Minnesota
Speaker 1: this summer, burning a police station to the ground, the
Speaker 1: rioting that took place there. They're not going to stop
Speaker 1: after election day. Everyone should take note on both levels.
Speaker 1: They're not going to stop, and they should not and
Speaker 1: we should not. Is that well Mitch McConnell is saying,
Speaker 1: does that provoke people? Did that provoke people in the summer.
Speaker 1: You cannot be civil with a political party that wants
Speaker 1: to destroy what you stand for, what you care about.
Speaker 1: But I like to debate this, gentleman, and I said no.
Speaker 1: I said, if we're in high school, I'd take you
Speaker 1: behind the gym and beat the hell out of him.
Speaker 1: Take a punch, punch. You can't keep playing them all day.
Speaker 1: We may have him down, pap All right, let's get
Speaker 1: to some calls here. Let's say hi to Rogers in Nebraska,
Speaker 1: Roger Sean Hannity Show, How are you hi, Sean. It's
Speaker 1: great to speak to you. My question is that pop
Speaker 1: scandal and the Biden family corruption be swept under the carpet.
Speaker 1: It's only just beginning. The guy that had the laptop,
Speaker 1: guess what. He has a copy of the hard drive.
Speaker 1: He knows, and he's been harassed, and he's thinking of
Speaker 1: a lot of lawsuits. And he's seen the hard drive.
Speaker 1: I've been briefed on its contents, and what is in
Speaker 1: there is only the tip of the iceberg. Both about
Speaker 1: the Biden family, foreign syndicate corruption scandal. That's only the
Speaker 1: tip of the iceberg. The stuff about Hunter. He's going
Speaker 1: to scare the living daylights out of people when it's
Speaker 1: ultimately revealed. All right, my friend, I'm on it. We
Speaker 1: don't stop working, we don't stop the battle for liberty
Speaker 1: and freedom, the cause of conservatism, and this great country
Speaker 1: never ends. Vinnie is in Long Island, New York. What's up, Vinny?
Speaker 1: How are you hi, Sean? How are you? I'm good, sir.
Speaker 1: Why why is it always the Republicans that come out
Speaker 1: against each other. Democrats are like the Chinese military. They
Speaker 1: march in line without beating missing a step. Here you
Speaker 1: have Rodney and Langford and Shaney, everybody comes out. They
Speaker 1: turned it back on Trump right away, and now they'll
Speaker 1: be just like you say, the weak Republicans that they've
Speaker 1: always been, always are now that Trump is gone. And
Speaker 1: I can't imagine what's going to happen in the next
Speaker 1: few years and what Democrats are going to try and
Speaker 1: push through. Jock. I think Republicans need new leadership in
Speaker 1: the Senate, and I think the Republican Party needs a
Speaker 1: gut check. What is important to them? What is their
Speaker 1: agenda going to be? And I think those people that
Speaker 1: are willing to lay down the agent it's very simple.
Speaker 1: This is not complicated Vinnie. Let me ask you this.
Speaker 1: If I was running for office and I said, I'm
Speaker 1: going to put America first. I want to cut everybody's taxes.
Speaker 1: Government is too big, too blow to, too bureaucratic, and
Speaker 1: out of control. I want to end the burdensome bureaucracy
Speaker 1: on business. If I said I will secure America's borders
Speaker 1: and that will have merit based immigration. If I said
Speaker 1: we going to again be energy independent. If I said
Speaker 1: I would only put constitutionalists on the Supreme Court, not
Speaker 1: liberal judicial activists. If I would expand fracking and natural
Speaker 1: gas production on top of all the energy that we
Speaker 1: would be producing elsewhere, and if I literally negotiated much
Speaker 1: better free affair or trade deals, kept us out of
Speaker 1: foreign conflicts, but built up our military so that we
Speaker 1: have the biggest, meanest, toughest military on the face of
Speaker 1: the earth. In case some at some point, we need
Speaker 1: to defend liberty and freedom, we have the ability to
Speaker 1: do so, and nobody would ever want to mess with us.
Speaker 1: Would you say that that's a pretty simple but yet
Speaker 1: profound thing, and it's worth fighting for that agenda. Absolutely,
Speaker 1: that's worth fighting forward to words voting for us. That's
Speaker 1: what I mean I want leaders that will stand up
Speaker 1: in the well of the House and Senate and in
Speaker 1: the in the arena of ideas win. That's what I want. Georgia.
Speaker 1: How is Georgia. Democrats would have never allowed what happened
Speaker 1: in Georgia. We lost two seats. We should have won
Speaker 1: the first seat on election night. I love Doug Collins.
Speaker 1: He's the guy I would have wanted Kemp to select
Speaker 1: to fill the Senate speed me too. He picked Loffler.
Speaker 1: He picked Kelly Lossler. Okay, she did actually a pretty
Speaker 1: good job while she was there, But Doug Collins that
Speaker 1: night takes a million votes away from Kelly Loffler. We
Speaker 1: lose that election. Now on the runoffs, she would have
Speaker 1: won that that seat on election night, John, this is
Speaker 1: the things that Republicans do that Democrats do not. You
Speaker 1: would have the Democratler has never allowed him to run.
Speaker 1: And look, I thought what Kemp did on so many
Speaker 1: different levels was wrong for the state. Same with the
Speaker 1: Secretary of State. And I'll tell you what I would
Speaker 1: predict right now. Kemp is up for re election in
Speaker 1: twenty twenty two, and I don't think he's going to
Speaker 1: be voted back in. Although the alternative might be a
Speaker 1: Stacey Abrams as governor issue. I don't know. I think
Speaker 1: somebody will challenge Kemp and you might have the same
Speaker 1: situation unfold because of the way that they have their
Speaker 1: primary system down in Georgia with runoffs, etc. You got
Speaker 1: to get fifty percent of the vote total. But with
Speaker 1: all of that said, I mean, I just don't want
Speaker 1: to elect Republicans that, if they make promises, aren't going
Speaker 1: to go on our behalf and do everything in their
Speaker 1: power to make that happen, and spend less time worrying
Speaker 1: if they're going to go back the next term. And
Speaker 1: I think that's the problem, and that's probably the biggest
Speaker 1: argument for term limits. Oh, no doubt about that. All right, Vinna,
Speaker 1: You're a good man. Thank you, my friend. I appreciate it.
Speaker 1: Deborah in Texas, Hey, Deborah, Hello, it's such a pleasure
Speaker 1: to talk to you, mister Hannity. I have admired you
Speaker 1: for telling the truth and taking the heat, and I
Speaker 1: love your sign off letting not your heart be troubled.
Speaker 1: That versus mean a lot to me personally over the years,
Speaker 1: so thank you. It means a lot to me too.
Speaker 1: Amazing job. Thank you. It actually heard that the very
Speaker 1: first time at my brother's funeral, and when I was
Speaker 1: ten years old. He was sixteen. He died of a
Speaker 1: brain tumor. And there's been a precious verse to me
Speaker 1: my whole life. I am sixty eight. Wow, you sound
Speaker 1: like a young sixty eight. Well, thank you, thank you.
Speaker 1: I have a lot of energy. Uh yeah, So what's
Speaker 1: on your mind? Energized? Well, I feel like there's so
Speaker 1: much fear, the fear on both sides. I watch, you know,
Speaker 1: Alexandria Housio Cortez crying on television and expressing the fear
Speaker 1: that she has. She needs to get a grip. Somebody
Speaker 1: needs to call her up and say, nobody's coming to
Speaker 1: kill you. You know, it's it's you know, pull yourself together.
Speaker 1: You have a very important job. You have to think straight.
Speaker 1: When people get this fearful, they don't think well, they
Speaker 1: get sick physically, and on both sides, people people need
Speaker 1: to calm down and get a grip and understand, you know,
Speaker 1: re rank themselves to the situation, and then figure out
Speaker 1: how you're going to move forward calmly, rationally. Listen. I
Speaker 1: think that's a good admonition for everybody. And thank you
Speaker 1: for the call, Deber and I wish all the best,
Speaker 1: and that is yes, I'm absolutely fine with people peacefully
Speaker 1: protesting expressing their views. We've got to protect our capital.
Speaker 1: We've got to protect our streets, our cities, in our
Speaker 1: towns too. And I find the duplicity and the double
Speaker 1: standard in all of this. It's, as usual, breathtaking. And
Speaker 1: when we talk about fighting, it's in the arena of ideas.
Speaker 1: It's the legislative process, it's the electoral process. That's why
Speaker 1: we need a free, fair election system that we have
Speaker 1: confidence in with the results integrity in the election, and
Speaker 1: that would be voter ID. You know, these are not
Speaker 1: complicated things. The very things you need to get into
Speaker 1: the Democratic National Convention. You need some type of picture ID.
Speaker 1: Can't have voting for months on end, you know, it's
Speaker 1: all the standards and laws must be followed. It's not
Speaker 1: that complicated, and we can do it if we wanted to.
Speaker 1: There are people that don't want to do it. That's
Speaker 1: why hr One by Pelosi. They want to lock in
Speaker 1: all these changes, especially on mail in voting, because they
Speaker 1: think it gives them an advantage. And that's why immigration
Speaker 1: is so important to liberal Democrats, but Republicans do need
Speaker 1: to stand on principle and if they're elected to do
Speaker 1: a job, do your job to the best your ability,
Speaker 1: and don't cower in a corner either. That's going to
Speaker 1: wrap things up at today Tonight Hannity Ninetiestern DVR, Part
Speaker 1: two of my interview with the computer repair shop owner
Speaker 1: John Paul mac Isaac. This time he talks about videos
Speaker 1: that he saw on Hunter's laptop. Also, how do you
Speaker 1: stop the unconstitutional post presidential impeachment impeachment? Also how do
Speaker 1: you stop the post presidential unconstituted chel impeachment? Shift Show Rampaul,
Speaker 1: Tom Cotton, Kevin McCarthy. Also Leo Terrell joins us, Greg
Speaker 1: Abbott joins us, the Governor of Texas and Representative Madison Hawthorne.
Speaker 1: All coming up nine Eastern. We'll see you tonight and
Speaker 1: back here on Monday. I hope you have a great weekend.
Speaker 1: Thanks for being will us