WEBVTT - The Battle for a Solar-Powered Future

0:00:02.400 --> 0:00:05.600
<v Speaker 1>This is Alec Baldwin and you're listening to Here's the

0:00:05.680 --> 0:00:11.800
<v Speaker 1>Thing from iHeart Radio. After decades of debate, it is

0:00:11.920 --> 0:00:15.160
<v Speaker 1>now common knowledge that the world is in the midst

0:00:15.200 --> 0:00:19.200
<v Speaker 1>of an ever increasing energy crisis, and that the long

0:00:19.360 --> 0:00:23.119
<v Speaker 1>era of burning fossil fuels for power is contributing to

0:00:23.280 --> 0:00:28.520
<v Speaker 1>our own demise. And yet the transition to alternative energy

0:00:28.840 --> 0:00:31.560
<v Speaker 1>is proving to be more complex than you might think.

0:00:32.240 --> 0:00:37.680
<v Speaker 1>The Harper's Magazine article Boomtown examines the solar land rush

0:00:37.760 --> 0:00:41.640
<v Speaker 1>currently happening in the American West, specifically in the town

0:00:41.680 --> 0:00:46.839
<v Speaker 1>of Beatty in Nai County, Nevada. The Ni County area

0:00:46.920 --> 0:00:50.760
<v Speaker 1>has the capacity to produce enough energy through its prospective

0:00:50.840 --> 0:00:56.840
<v Speaker 1>solar farms to power the entire planet, Yes, the entire planet.

0:00:57.560 --> 0:01:01.440
<v Speaker 1>Close to the entrance of Death Valley National Park, It's

0:01:01.480 --> 0:01:05.759
<v Speaker 1>an area rife with flat land and almost endless sunlight,

0:01:06.400 --> 0:01:10.240
<v Speaker 1>but residents are pushing back on proposals to use its

0:01:10.319 --> 0:01:15.240
<v Speaker 1>land for this purpose. After a series of exploitative boom

0:01:15.319 --> 0:01:19.440
<v Speaker 1>bust cycles like the Gold Rush. Residents are opposing the

0:01:19.560 --> 0:01:25.240
<v Speaker 1>plan on ecological and economic grounds. They argue that covering

0:01:25.360 --> 0:01:30.840
<v Speaker 1>Nevada in solar panels will affect wildlife, recreational spaces, and

0:01:30.880 --> 0:01:36.080
<v Speaker 1>the town's future. The article asks the difficult questions of

0:01:36.120 --> 0:01:40.199
<v Speaker 1>who should sacrifice for our collective future and at what cost.

0:01:41.200 --> 0:01:45.640
<v Speaker 1>My guests today are deep into this inquiry. Dustin mulvaney

0:01:45.840 --> 0:01:50.200
<v Speaker 1>is a solar expert and professor of environmental studies at

0:01:50.240 --> 0:01:54.760
<v Speaker 1>San Jose State University, and he collaborated on the Harper's article.

0:01:55.280 --> 0:02:00.240
<v Speaker 1>But first the author of Boomtown, Hilary Angelo, is an

0:02:00.360 --> 0:02:05.680
<v Speaker 1>urban environmental sociologist and associate professor of sociology at the

0:02:05.800 --> 0:02:10.239
<v Speaker 1>University of California, Santa Cruz. She is also a current

0:02:10.400 --> 0:02:13.800
<v Speaker 1>member of the Institute for Advanced Study, where she is

0:02:13.880 --> 0:02:17.919
<v Speaker 1>working with other scholars on the issue of climate crisis politics.

0:02:18.600 --> 0:02:21.720
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to know how her work in urban sociology

0:02:22.160 --> 0:02:26.840
<v Speaker 1>was related to sustainability and the growing issue of water scarcity.

0:02:27.520 --> 0:02:29.359
<v Speaker 2>I do a lot of work on urban sustainability and

0:02:29.400 --> 0:02:32.160
<v Speaker 2>sustainability planning in general, and so a lot of questions

0:02:32.200 --> 0:02:37.320
<v Speaker 2>about how human settlement relates to the external environment. So

0:02:37.400 --> 0:02:39.680
<v Speaker 2>one of my interests in this topic and in these

0:02:39.760 --> 0:02:43.160
<v Speaker 2>questions about energy is are we making the same decisions

0:02:43.160 --> 0:02:46.400
<v Speaker 2>again as we now confront this new environmental crisis? Because

0:02:46.560 --> 0:02:49.040
<v Speaker 2>much like we've done with water. We sort of created

0:02:49.040 --> 0:02:51.960
<v Speaker 2>these very large scale infrastructure systems in the twentieth century

0:02:52.280 --> 0:02:55.760
<v Speaker 2>that made huge quantities of water available to you know,

0:02:55.760 --> 0:02:58.160
<v Speaker 2>people who lived in cities in Los Angeles and elsewhere,

0:02:58.360 --> 0:03:03.040
<v Speaker 2>and we're now confronting the unsustainabilities of those decisions, especially

0:03:03.080 --> 0:03:05.280
<v Speaker 2>as the West gets dryer. And so yeah, I think

0:03:05.280 --> 0:03:08.440
<v Speaker 2>there's a kind of similar dynamic that's happening now. Obviously

0:03:08.480 --> 0:03:10.080
<v Speaker 2>we're not going to run out of sun, but we

0:03:10.160 --> 0:03:12.720
<v Speaker 2>will run out of land, or you know, we can

0:03:12.760 --> 0:03:15.320
<v Speaker 2>be making different choices about how to use these resources.

0:03:15.960 --> 0:03:17.960
<v Speaker 1>You know, when I was out there, it was like,

0:03:18.520 --> 0:03:21.679
<v Speaker 1>you know, people desperate, a lot of handwringing, a lot

0:03:21.720 --> 0:03:24.560
<v Speaker 1>of pronouncements, and then it would abate and it would

0:03:24.560 --> 0:03:27.480
<v Speaker 1>go away again for a while. But when I read

0:03:27.560 --> 0:03:31.960
<v Speaker 1>your article, I mean, now we pivot from that to Nevada.

0:03:32.480 --> 0:03:35.520
<v Speaker 1>Baity is the city, NI County is the general area.

0:03:35.960 --> 0:03:38.280
<v Speaker 1>And I don't want to use the word nimby, because

0:03:38.280 --> 0:03:42.080
<v Speaker 1>that to me bespeaks rich, privileged people who don't want

0:03:42.320 --> 0:03:47.880
<v Speaker 1>things in their vista that are necessary and they want

0:03:47.920 --> 0:03:50.600
<v Speaker 1>to impose among other people. I don't view those people

0:03:50.640 --> 0:03:53.600
<v Speaker 1>as nimby. How do you describe those residents there.

0:03:54.160 --> 0:03:56.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean, it's nice of you not to use

0:03:56.080 --> 0:03:58.920
<v Speaker 2>the term. When I initially heard that there were people

0:03:58.960 --> 0:04:02.040
<v Speaker 2>in the desert protest solar development, I also sort of

0:04:02.160 --> 0:04:04.960
<v Speaker 2>thought or assumed that they were Nimbi's. You know, that

0:04:05.080 --> 0:04:07.400
<v Speaker 2>is the framework that we're used to thinking about these issues,

0:04:07.440 --> 0:04:09.280
<v Speaker 2>which is a question of sort of you know, private

0:04:09.320 --> 0:04:13.280
<v Speaker 2>property or private interests versus questions of public good. When

0:04:13.360 --> 0:04:15.920
<v Speaker 2>I met these people, I mean, I think what I

0:04:15.960 --> 0:04:17.839
<v Speaker 2>found so interesting about them and what made me write

0:04:17.839 --> 0:04:21.640
<v Speaker 2>the article, is that I felt they were actually trying

0:04:21.640 --> 0:04:24.279
<v Speaker 2>to make this very important critique that has more to

0:04:24.320 --> 0:04:26.679
<v Speaker 2>do with what you were just talking about about, for example,

0:04:26.720 --> 0:04:29.360
<v Speaker 2>the choices we made about water and other natural resources

0:04:29.360 --> 0:04:32.599
<v Speaker 2>in the twentieth century. Basically, they were saying, this is

0:04:32.600 --> 0:04:36.000
<v Speaker 2>a question of how we do social change, and we're

0:04:36.040 --> 0:04:38.760
<v Speaker 2>claiming that climate change is this moment of large scale

0:04:38.760 --> 0:04:42.359
<v Speaker 2>social transformation. But actually from our perspective, from their perspective,

0:04:42.760 --> 0:04:45.960
<v Speaker 2>we're making the same decisions about land use, about infrastructure development,

0:04:46.040 --> 0:04:49.080
<v Speaker 2>and so on. So I thought that kind of critique

0:04:49.080 --> 0:04:51.320
<v Speaker 2>that was being made doesn't fit into how we understand

0:04:51.360 --> 0:04:54.880
<v Speaker 2>Nimbi's Public land in the United States is a commons

0:04:54.960 --> 0:04:57.080
<v Speaker 2>or could be described as a commons, which isn't a

0:04:57.120 --> 0:04:59.440
<v Speaker 2>vocabulary that we use in the US very much, but

0:04:59.440 --> 0:05:01.880
<v Speaker 2>people talk ab got it. There's sort of similar fights

0:05:01.880 --> 0:05:05.480
<v Speaker 2>about renewable energy development in Latin America and Africa, and

0:05:05.520 --> 0:05:08.440
<v Speaker 2>people use the term energy grabbing like so they sort

0:05:08.480 --> 0:05:11.480
<v Speaker 2>of talk about this common land being taken by energy

0:05:11.520 --> 0:05:14.920
<v Speaker 2>companies and the implications that has for rural livelihoods, And

0:05:14.960 --> 0:05:16.960
<v Speaker 2>so I think that is actually much more similar to

0:05:17.000 --> 0:05:18.440
<v Speaker 2>what's going on in the American West.

0:05:18.560 --> 0:05:23.159
<v Speaker 1>Now, you know, here in New York, where as everybody knows,

0:05:23.200 --> 0:05:26.159
<v Speaker 1>you know, Robert Moses condemns and through eminent domain takes

0:05:26.480 --> 0:05:29.560
<v Speaker 1>whole neighborhoods in the Bronx so we can build a highway.

0:05:30.400 --> 0:05:33.920
<v Speaker 1>In New York City in cooperation with the state, sees

0:05:33.960 --> 0:05:38.080
<v Speaker 1>through eminent domain valleys of land that they evicted everybody

0:05:38.120 --> 0:05:40.320
<v Speaker 1>from and flooded them to make the reservoir system for

0:05:40.360 --> 0:05:44.400
<v Speaker 1>the city's drinking water. But in the area of Nevada

0:05:44.440 --> 0:05:47.480
<v Speaker 1>you were in, do they view it purely as another

0:05:47.839 --> 0:05:53.080
<v Speaker 1>rush companies coming in private companies to alter the landscape.

0:05:53.680 --> 0:05:59.240
<v Speaker 1>Do they see it as a critical element potentially in

0:05:59.320 --> 0:06:02.040
<v Speaker 1>something that we all have to make some sacrifices for

0:06:02.040 --> 0:06:05.359
<v Speaker 1>in some contribution, which is to address climate change.

0:06:05.680 --> 0:06:08.520
<v Speaker 2>Right, Yeah, it's a good question. I don't know. I

0:06:08.520 --> 0:06:10.719
<v Speaker 2>think some of them do and some of them probably don't.

0:06:10.800 --> 0:06:10.920
<v Speaker 1>Right.

0:06:10.960 --> 0:06:16.479
<v Speaker 2>For some people, there is a very personal emotional reaction

0:06:16.600 --> 0:06:18.440
<v Speaker 2>that any of us would have, right if the government

0:06:18.520 --> 0:06:22.080
<v Speaker 2>was coming and seizing land or you know, building flooding

0:06:22.120 --> 0:06:23.960
<v Speaker 2>a valley and putting a reservoir in your backyard. Of

0:06:24.000 --> 0:06:25.880
<v Speaker 2>that kind of thing, they just got themselves as fighting

0:06:25.880 --> 0:06:28.279
<v Speaker 2>for their lives. So that I think often in that

0:06:28.320 --> 0:06:30.920
<v Speaker 2>framework it doesn't sort of rise to the level of

0:06:30.960 --> 0:06:33.840
<v Speaker 2>the public good questions. But you know, one thing I

0:06:33.880 --> 0:06:37.400
<v Speaker 2>would say is that even within that, like even when

0:06:37.640 --> 0:06:40.080
<v Speaker 2>we start thinking in those terms about you know, what

0:06:40.240 --> 0:06:42.640
<v Speaker 2>is in the national interest or the public interest here,

0:06:42.800 --> 0:06:46.120
<v Speaker 2>and how should these public lands be used, Like, there's

0:06:46.120 --> 0:06:50.000
<v Speaker 2>a real question about what the highest and best use is.

0:06:50.080 --> 0:06:51.960
<v Speaker 2>So for example, in the West, there was a period

0:06:51.960 --> 0:06:54.560
<v Speaker 2>of time when valleys were being flooded for reservoirs.

0:06:54.640 --> 0:06:54.800
<v Speaker 1>Right.

0:06:55.240 --> 0:06:57.760
<v Speaker 2>So, I mean there have been shifts in the kind

0:06:57.800 --> 0:07:01.400
<v Speaker 2>of American public consciousness and sentiment about these issues over

0:07:01.480 --> 0:07:05.000
<v Speaker 2>time in terms of saying to themselves, well, you know,

0:07:05.040 --> 0:07:06.640
<v Speaker 2>the thing that's really in the public interest is to

0:07:06.640 --> 0:07:08.480
<v Speaker 2>have this reservoir here versus the thing that's in the

0:07:08.520 --> 0:07:11.720
<v Speaker 2>public interest is to save this you know, beautiful valley

0:07:11.800 --> 0:07:13.640
<v Speaker 2>so that we can have that as part of our

0:07:13.920 --> 0:07:17.120
<v Speaker 2>heart fish stocks exactly. And so yeah, I think what

0:07:17.240 --> 0:07:19.760
<v Speaker 2>I find complicated about this question is is that that's

0:07:19.800 --> 0:07:21.600
<v Speaker 2>an open question. Right. There's a climate crisis and we

0:07:21.640 --> 0:07:23.800
<v Speaker 2>have to be carbonized, but there's also an extinction crisis

0:07:23.800 --> 0:07:27.360
<v Speaker 2>and a biodiversity crisis, and so one can argue that

0:07:27.960 --> 0:07:31.560
<v Speaker 2>preserving desert habitat is you know, is also an important

0:07:31.600 --> 0:07:32.880
<v Speaker 2>part of responding to claims.

0:07:33.040 --> 0:07:36.680
<v Speaker 1>Just so if you have where you you mentioned in

0:07:36.720 --> 0:07:39.800
<v Speaker 1>the article, the eighty five percent of the land mass

0:07:39.800 --> 0:07:42.360
<v Speaker 1>in the state of Nevada is federal land. Yeah, and

0:07:42.760 --> 0:07:43.800
<v Speaker 1>is all of that controlled by.

0:07:43.680 --> 0:07:47.040
<v Speaker 2>BLM basically yes. So yeah, So for.

0:07:47.000 --> 0:07:50.160
<v Speaker 1>People who are listening, is Beaty and n County is

0:07:50.200 --> 0:07:52.800
<v Speaker 1>that on federal land that they're allowed to occupy or

0:07:52.800 --> 0:07:54.360
<v Speaker 1>are they in private land?

0:07:54.680 --> 0:07:57.160
<v Speaker 2>It's federal land. So Beaty is a small is a

0:07:57.200 --> 0:07:59.720
<v Speaker 2>town that they describe as sort of landlocked. So it's

0:07:59.760 --> 0:08:03.480
<v Speaker 2>a little island of you know, people have owned parcels

0:08:03.480 --> 0:08:06.000
<v Speaker 2>of land and then it's surrounded by public land and

0:08:06.120 --> 0:08:08.600
<v Speaker 2>for people who are listening. So public lands managed mostly

0:08:08.600 --> 0:08:10.400
<v Speaker 2>by the Bureau of Land Management, which is a department

0:08:10.440 --> 0:08:13.480
<v Speaker 2>of the Interior, sometimes the Forest Service and other things,

0:08:13.600 --> 0:08:16.000
<v Speaker 2>and they're managed under what's called the multiple Use Mandate,

0:08:16.040 --> 0:08:18.680
<v Speaker 2>which means these lands, unlike national parks, are open for

0:08:19.000 --> 0:08:23.320
<v Speaker 2>extractive activities or energy development as well as recreation. And

0:08:23.480 --> 0:08:25.280
<v Speaker 2>it's actually one in ten acres of land in the

0:08:25.360 --> 0:08:29.320
<v Speaker 2>United States, which I found amazing just to learn. So, yeah,

0:08:29.360 --> 0:08:32.360
<v Speaker 2>so it's a little island of a regular town where

0:08:32.400 --> 0:08:35.160
<v Speaker 2>people own properties surrounded by this public land.

0:08:35.720 --> 0:08:39.400
<v Speaker 1>When did the people of NY County get introduced to

0:08:39.480 --> 0:08:40.960
<v Speaker 1>this rush?

0:08:41.040 --> 0:08:44.040
<v Speaker 2>Basically now it's happening now. So there was a sort

0:08:44.080 --> 0:08:46.800
<v Speaker 2>of initial solar rush or you know, phase one of

0:08:46.800 --> 0:08:48.880
<v Speaker 2>the solar rush, which is about ten years ago. And

0:08:49.000 --> 0:08:51.760
<v Speaker 2>Dustin Melvini, who you'll be speaking to later today, has

0:08:51.760 --> 0:08:54.240
<v Speaker 2>been studying that so can talk about this over a

0:08:54.280 --> 0:08:57.360
<v Speaker 2>longer timescale. But much of that took place in California.

0:08:57.440 --> 0:08:59.600
<v Speaker 2>And so the people I mentioned in the article, Kevin

0:08:59.640 --> 0:09:02.080
<v Speaker 2>and Laura, who run a nonprofit called Basin and Range Watch.

0:09:02.200 --> 0:09:04.520
<v Speaker 2>They have been part of a group of sort of

0:09:04.600 --> 0:09:09.120
<v Speaker 2>western desert advocates and desert protectors, who include people trained

0:09:09.120 --> 0:09:11.400
<v Speaker 2>in conservation biology and that kind of thing, but also

0:09:11.480 --> 0:09:15.440
<v Speaker 2>many tribes and indigenous groups and activists and artists and

0:09:15.480 --> 0:09:17.240
<v Speaker 2>kind of other people who care about the desert for

0:09:17.280 --> 0:09:20.640
<v Speaker 2>various reasons. And so they started arguing, you know, ten

0:09:20.720 --> 0:09:26.000
<v Speaker 2>years ago that renewable energy development of this sort sort

0:09:26.000 --> 0:09:29.920
<v Speaker 2>of large scale on what is called undisturbed lands was

0:09:30.000 --> 0:09:33.000
<v Speaker 2>going to threaten deserts and was a problem. It's just

0:09:33.120 --> 0:09:35.800
<v Speaker 2>come to beaty kind of now. And it's come because

0:09:36.080 --> 0:09:38.720
<v Speaker 2>there's a new transmission line that's going to be built

0:09:38.760 --> 0:09:41.320
<v Speaker 2>around the state of Nevada. So it's a big triangle

0:09:41.360 --> 0:09:44.720
<v Speaker 2>and that's going to help carry renewable energy but also

0:09:44.960 --> 0:09:49.280
<v Speaker 2>fossil fuel based energy probably and export that to other states.

0:09:49.920 --> 0:09:52.959
<v Speaker 2>So the solar developers are kind of following where these

0:09:52.960 --> 0:09:54.800
<v Speaker 2>transmission lines are likely to be.

0:09:55.480 --> 0:09:59.920
<v Speaker 1>Now, knowing as we do that similar to the water crisis,

0:10:00.080 --> 0:10:03.439
<v Speaker 1>there's a clock ticking here in terms of climate change

0:10:03.840 --> 0:10:06.480
<v Speaker 1>and global warming, and I'm wondering what you think what

0:10:06.520 --> 0:10:10.559
<v Speaker 1>it's going to take for us to have I never

0:10:10.679 --> 0:10:14.320
<v Speaker 1>used the word Manhattan Project because that bespeaks war. I

0:10:14.600 --> 0:10:16.640
<v Speaker 1>tend to use the word Apollo Project, where we're going

0:10:16.679 --> 0:10:18.840
<v Speaker 1>to really, really the government's going to get serious about

0:10:18.840 --> 0:10:21.400
<v Speaker 1>spending money on these projects, not waiting for private developers

0:10:21.400 --> 0:10:23.000
<v Speaker 1>to do it. What do you think it's going to take.

0:10:23.200 --> 0:10:25.679
<v Speaker 2>What an excellent question. I think we're all we're all

0:10:25.720 --> 0:10:26.800
<v Speaker 2>asking that question right now.

0:10:27.040 --> 0:10:27.360
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:10:27.400 --> 0:10:29.360
<v Speaker 2>And to be clear, just since you were talking about

0:10:29.400 --> 0:10:32.040
<v Speaker 2>some of like sort of where nationally we're going to

0:10:32.040 --> 0:10:34.960
<v Speaker 2>be putting renewable energy development, right, I am not. I mean,

0:10:35.880 --> 0:10:38.280
<v Speaker 2>most energy experts agree that we're going to need some

0:10:38.559 --> 0:10:42.079
<v Speaker 2>you know, large scale utility scale solar and wand and renewables.

0:10:42.080 --> 0:10:44.080
<v Speaker 2>So this is not a this is not an argument

0:10:44.120 --> 0:10:47.960
<v Speaker 2>against large scale solar per se. It's a question about

0:10:48.120 --> 0:10:49.960
<v Speaker 2>where we put it and how we're building it out.

0:10:50.400 --> 0:10:53.360
<v Speaker 2>Human settlements are all kind of unsustainable in their own ways, right,

0:10:53.400 --> 0:10:55.840
<v Speaker 2>So some cities need water brought to them, some cities

0:10:55.880 --> 0:10:58.000
<v Speaker 2>need food brought into them, like New York. So it's

0:10:58.000 --> 0:11:00.280
<v Speaker 2>not again, it's not also to say that, you know,

0:11:00.280 --> 0:11:04.199
<v Speaker 2>we've made a terrible mistake creating cities in the Southwest.

0:11:04.640 --> 0:11:06.400
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I think there's a few things that are

0:11:06.440 --> 0:11:09.320
<v Speaker 2>missing right now. So one is we don't really have

0:11:09.360 --> 0:11:11.800
<v Speaker 2>good frameworks for large scale planning in the United States.

0:11:11.840 --> 0:11:13.720
<v Speaker 2>And I sort of mentioned this, I think in the

0:11:13.800 --> 0:11:16.520
<v Speaker 2>article in passing, probably in one sentence. But there isn't

0:11:16.920 --> 0:11:19.240
<v Speaker 2>other than the Bureau of Land Management, which isn't really

0:11:19.400 --> 0:11:21.719
<v Speaker 2>staffed or funded for playing this kind of role. There

0:11:21.760 --> 0:11:24.200
<v Speaker 2>is not a federal agency that can make really big,

0:11:24.200 --> 0:11:27.959
<v Speaker 2>coordinated decisions about land use. Seems very important. So there

0:11:28.000 --> 0:11:30.800
<v Speaker 2>are you know, there are planned energy corridors like so

0:11:30.880 --> 0:11:34.120
<v Speaker 2>there's a they know where these transmission lines are likely

0:11:34.160 --> 0:11:36.520
<v Speaker 2>to go. There was some federal planning around that, but

0:11:36.559 --> 0:11:41.600
<v Speaker 2>there's absolutely no coordination between different types of activities related

0:11:41.600 --> 0:11:45.679
<v Speaker 2>to renewables, So lithium, geothermal, solar farms, all that can

0:11:45.760 --> 0:11:47.760
<v Speaker 2>kind of happen in the same place. All those permits

0:11:47.760 --> 0:11:51.439
<v Speaker 2>are assessed separately. The planning of transmission lines and location

0:11:51.520 --> 0:11:54.800
<v Speaker 2>of substations takes place separately from questions about where to

0:11:54.840 --> 0:11:57.800
<v Speaker 2>put actual solar farms. So all of these things are

0:11:57.800 --> 0:12:00.640
<v Speaker 2>happening in this really piecemeal way that makes it hard

0:12:00.640 --> 0:12:03.800
<v Speaker 2>to make good decisions. And I think also the role

0:12:03.880 --> 0:12:07.160
<v Speaker 2>that the federal government is playing is one of kind

0:12:07.160 --> 0:12:09.680
<v Speaker 2>of lowering barriers to private development. Right They've tried to

0:12:09.720 --> 0:12:12.760
<v Speaker 2>make it easier for many good reasons for private developers

0:12:12.840 --> 0:12:15.760
<v Speaker 2>to build out solar, to build out renewables, to reduce

0:12:15.800 --> 0:12:18.080
<v Speaker 2>the financial risks that those companies are taking on to

0:12:18.160 --> 0:12:22.200
<v Speaker 2>do it. Which is good in terms of facilitating you know,

0:12:22.400 --> 0:12:25.640
<v Speaker 2>solar happening quickly, it is not as good in terms

0:12:25.720 --> 0:12:30.320
<v Speaker 2>of helping guide projects to the best locations or having

0:12:30.320 --> 0:12:33.120
<v Speaker 2>these kinds of big picture questions in mind. Right, So

0:12:33.160 --> 0:12:36.480
<v Speaker 2>the federal government could be making decisions like should this

0:12:36.559 --> 0:12:39.120
<v Speaker 2>land in central Nevada be part of our twenty five

0:12:39.200 --> 0:12:42.240
<v Speaker 2>y twenty five initiative, which is the goal to build

0:12:42.280 --> 0:12:44.840
<v Speaker 2>out twenty five gigatts of solar by twenty twenty five

0:12:44.880 --> 0:12:46.520
<v Speaker 2>on public lands, or.

0:12:46.480 --> 0:12:48.480
<v Speaker 1>The thirty ontograt for that.

0:12:48.160 --> 0:12:50.319
<v Speaker 2>They're trying to be Yeah, but there's also at the

0:12:50.320 --> 0:12:52.520
<v Speaker 2>same time a thirty by thirty initiative, which is to

0:12:52.520 --> 0:12:54.720
<v Speaker 2>conserve thirty percent of the land mass in the United

0:12:54.720 --> 0:12:57.880
<v Speaker 2>States as you know and whatever they call it, you know,

0:12:57.920 --> 0:13:01.280
<v Speaker 2>intact habitat. And so this land in Nevada be part

0:13:01.280 --> 0:13:03.840
<v Speaker 2>of the energy sort of portfolio or part of the

0:13:03.840 --> 0:13:06.400
<v Speaker 2>conservation portfolio. I mean, those are the kinds of questions

0:13:06.440 --> 0:13:09.800
<v Speaker 2>that I think the federal government could be stepping in

0:13:09.840 --> 0:13:10.680
<v Speaker 2>to help answer.

0:13:11.400 --> 0:13:17.720
<v Speaker 1>You're an urban sociologist, describe for our listeners what that is. Yeah.

0:13:17.760 --> 0:13:21.000
<v Speaker 2>So I usually say I'm an urban and environmental sociologist,

0:13:21.120 --> 0:13:23.000
<v Speaker 2>and so a lot of my work is about ideas

0:13:23.040 --> 0:13:26.160
<v Speaker 2>about nature and the environment and how we mobilize them

0:13:26.160 --> 0:13:29.160
<v Speaker 2>when making decisions about the built environment about cities. So,

0:13:29.360 --> 0:13:31.520
<v Speaker 2>before I got my PhD, I worked for the New

0:13:31.559 --> 0:13:32.560
<v Speaker 2>York City Parks Department.

0:13:32.600 --> 0:13:34.760
<v Speaker 1>Actually, so, where are you from.

0:13:34.760 --> 0:13:38.120
<v Speaker 2>Originally I'm actually from Kentucky, but I went to college

0:13:38.160 --> 0:13:39.440
<v Speaker 2>near here. I went to Vassar i.

0:13:39.800 --> 0:13:42.439
<v Speaker 1>Vasa, Yeah, nuts valid, and then you got your PhD.

0:13:44.080 --> 0:13:45.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, So I worked here in city government and then

0:13:45.880 --> 0:13:49.000
<v Speaker 2>I stayed here. I worked for a program called Partnerships

0:13:49.000 --> 0:13:52.400
<v Speaker 2>for Parks that was actually a public private partnership, but

0:13:52.400 --> 0:13:56.400
<v Speaker 2>it basically existed, exists, it still exists to get communities

0:13:56.520 --> 0:13:59.480
<v Speaker 2>involved in their city parks and to advocate for them,

0:14:00.040 --> 0:14:02.559
<v Speaker 2>and to also help the parks department work better with

0:14:02.600 --> 0:14:03.000
<v Speaker 2>the public.

0:14:03.640 --> 0:14:06.680
<v Speaker 1>I first moved here in seventy nine to go to NYU,

0:14:07.520 --> 0:14:11.720
<v Speaker 1>and then the Conservancy emerged, and there was all this brief,

0:14:11.760 --> 0:14:17.000
<v Speaker 1>as I recall, debate about what union labor no city

0:14:17.080 --> 0:14:20.040
<v Speaker 1>workers who worked there, how much were they being usurped

0:14:20.680 --> 0:14:23.640
<v Speaker 1>by this private group. Now we have this quasi private

0:14:23.680 --> 0:14:27.160
<v Speaker 1>public marriage of the two. I mean Central Park is

0:14:27.200 --> 0:14:28.320
<v Speaker 1>like a business.

0:14:27.920 --> 0:14:30.800
<v Speaker 2>Now it is. And you know this actually relates to

0:14:30.840 --> 0:14:32.360
<v Speaker 2>the other things we're talking about. I mean it's a

0:14:32.360 --> 0:14:36.320
<v Speaker 2>double edged sword. In the West. I mean, national parks

0:14:36.400 --> 0:14:38.760
<v Speaker 2>are much like Central Park. Right. National parks, as many

0:14:38.800 --> 0:14:42.400
<v Speaker 2>people know, are these very controlled spaces. You're shuttled from

0:14:42.440 --> 0:14:45.880
<v Speaker 2>here to there. They're super crowded, there's lots of infrastructure, bathrooms,

0:14:46.120 --> 0:14:51.120
<v Speaker 2>internet for tourists. It's for tourists. Public lands are like

0:14:51.160 --> 0:14:53.240
<v Speaker 2>the interstitial spaces were I mean, I will just say

0:14:53.240 --> 0:14:56.880
<v Speaker 2>so coming from California, there's a lot of state parks there.

0:14:57.000 --> 0:14:58.840
<v Speaker 2>They don't allow dogs in state parks. So it was

0:14:58.880 --> 0:15:00.480
<v Speaker 2>the middle of COVID and I got dog when I

0:15:00.520 --> 0:15:02.280
<v Speaker 2>moved to California from New York because I didn't know

0:15:02.320 --> 0:15:04.240
<v Speaker 2>what else to do with my time, and so I

0:15:04.320 --> 0:15:06.440
<v Speaker 2>discovered public lands because it was a place you could

0:15:06.440 --> 0:15:08.760
<v Speaker 2>take your dog. You can take your dog, you can

0:15:08.760 --> 0:15:12.040
<v Speaker 2>shoot guns, you can ride motorized vehicles, you can live there,

0:15:12.080 --> 0:15:14.640
<v Speaker 2>you can camp for fourteen days without a permit. It's

0:15:14.680 --> 0:15:18.600
<v Speaker 2>a really kind of interesting and amazing place. Again just

0:15:18.640 --> 0:15:21.160
<v Speaker 2>because as an urban nite and a coastal urban nite.

0:15:21.200 --> 0:15:23.840
<v Speaker 2>I really had no sense that this land existed in

0:15:23.840 --> 0:15:26.320
<v Speaker 2>the United States and that it still exists. And it's

0:15:26.360 --> 0:15:27.680
<v Speaker 2>not to say that it's a free for all, but

0:15:27.880 --> 0:15:29.920
<v Speaker 2>those are the kinds of questions that are coming up

0:15:29.960 --> 0:15:32.880
<v Speaker 2>now about about these landscapes. I think in a similar way,

0:15:32.960 --> 0:15:37.120
<v Speaker 2>and the changes in parks in New York, I think

0:15:37.480 --> 0:15:41.920
<v Speaker 2>can show us how public relationships to these spaces changes

0:15:41.960 --> 0:15:44.800
<v Speaker 2>so dramatically. Right, Central Park went from being a dangerous

0:15:44.800 --> 0:15:47.040
<v Speaker 2>place that was not particularly valued or was seen as

0:15:47.080 --> 0:15:48.920
<v Speaker 2>like a liability.

0:15:49.080 --> 0:15:50.840
<v Speaker 1>We don't go in the park. Right, the park was

0:15:50.920 --> 0:15:53.200
<v Speaker 1>dangerous as a very dangerous space.

0:15:53.280 --> 0:15:54.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, everybody, it's like the mall.

0:15:56.200 --> 0:15:56.480
<v Speaker 1>It is.

0:15:57.960 --> 0:15:58.360
<v Speaker 2>Central Park.

0:15:58.440 --> 0:16:09.360
<v Speaker 1>No, No, No. Urban and environmental sociologist Hillary Angelo. If

0:16:09.400 --> 0:16:14.120
<v Speaker 1>you are interested in conversations about energy sources and our future,

0:16:14.640 --> 0:16:18.160
<v Speaker 1>be sure to check out my episode with journalist Nicholas Narkos,

0:16:18.520 --> 0:16:23.040
<v Speaker 1>who investigated the cobalt rush in the Democratic Republic of Congo.

0:16:23.680 --> 0:16:26.840
<v Speaker 3>Just like chatting with his kid ZICKI. He was working

0:16:26.880 --> 0:16:29.560
<v Speaker 3>in mind since he was three, basically, and then there

0:16:29.600 --> 0:16:31.680
<v Speaker 3>was this moment where I showed him my phone. I said,

0:16:31.720 --> 0:16:34.320
<v Speaker 3>the new iPhone is going for a two hundred dollars

0:16:34.360 --> 0:16:36.840
<v Speaker 3>and everybody there knows that it's going into batteries something

0:16:36.880 --> 0:16:38.960
<v Speaker 3>like fifty percent of the cobalt. Mind there it goes

0:16:39.280 --> 0:16:41.720
<v Speaker 3>into letting my own batteries. How do you feel about this?

0:16:41.760 --> 0:16:43.920
<v Speaker 3>And he was just like, I feel terrible, And I

0:16:44.000 --> 0:16:47.000
<v Speaker 3>think he sort of thought, you know, how can people

0:16:47.120 --> 0:16:50.160
<v Speaker 3>sort of sanction such violence against people like me?

0:16:51.840 --> 0:16:55.920
<v Speaker 1>Hear more of my conversation with Nicholas Narkos that Here's

0:16:56.000 --> 0:17:00.640
<v Speaker 1>the Thing dot org After the break, Hillary Angelo proposes

0:17:01.120 --> 0:17:14.200
<v Speaker 1>new ways of thinking for the solar model. I'm ATLEC.

0:17:14.240 --> 0:17:17.800
<v Speaker 1>Baldwin and you were listening to Here's the Thing. For

0:17:17.960 --> 0:17:21.200
<v Speaker 1>her article on the solar boom in the West, Hillary

0:17:21.280 --> 0:17:24.000
<v Speaker 1>Angelo dug deep into the history of the area and

0:17:24.040 --> 0:17:27.880
<v Speaker 1>the exploitation of its land. I wanted to know if

0:17:27.920 --> 0:17:31.240
<v Speaker 1>places like Ni County were deemed off limits for development,

0:17:31.640 --> 0:17:33.720
<v Speaker 1>what spaces might be used instead.

0:17:34.800 --> 0:17:37.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's a great question. People talk about locating large

0:17:37.920 --> 0:17:40.520
<v Speaker 2>scale solar on disturbed lands, that's what they call these.

0:17:40.560 --> 0:17:43.080
<v Speaker 2>So this is sort of industrial I think in terms

0:17:43.119 --> 0:17:45.280
<v Speaker 2>of things like brown Field. So yeah, where there was

0:17:45.320 --> 0:17:48.600
<v Speaker 2>a factory and it's polluted. They talk about areas where

0:17:48.600 --> 0:17:53.560
<v Speaker 2>there was strip mining, and Appalachia so often prison top, yeah, mountaintop.

0:17:53.680 --> 0:17:57.639
<v Speaker 2>So often prisons come to those regions now because they're

0:17:57.680 --> 0:18:00.320
<v Speaker 2>sort of, you know, undesirable land uses. People don't want

0:18:00.320 --> 0:18:02.680
<v Speaker 2>prisons near their houses. But it's also not the best

0:18:03.240 --> 0:18:05.840
<v Speaker 2>thing for a community in Appalachia, right, Maybe you'd prefer

0:18:05.880 --> 0:18:08.920
<v Speaker 2>to have a solar farm in a prison. There's also farmland.

0:18:09.119 --> 0:18:11.960
<v Speaker 2>This is in California, so exhausted farmland that can't be

0:18:12.040 --> 0:18:13.960
<v Speaker 2>used for farming anymore, or that they don't have water

0:18:14.040 --> 0:18:16.560
<v Speaker 2>to farm on anymore, Like that's another good place for it.

0:18:16.680 --> 0:18:20.440
<v Speaker 2>So yeah, I think those are all possible.

0:18:21.400 --> 0:18:25.640
<v Speaker 1>Now, the energy that could be accessed by the residents

0:18:25.680 --> 0:18:29.240
<v Speaker 1>of Ni County doesn't have to be part of a

0:18:29.320 --> 0:18:32.720
<v Speaker 1>solar farm that they're constructing. You could literally in the

0:18:32.760 --> 0:18:35.200
<v Speaker 1>bargaining say you're going to build us our own solar farm.

0:18:35.359 --> 0:18:37.639
<v Speaker 1>In other words, we're going to have free energy for

0:18:37.720 --> 0:18:40.720
<v Speaker 1>everybody that lives here, free for the rest of our lives.

0:18:40.880 --> 0:18:42.520
<v Speaker 1>And that's the gift you're going to give us, an

0:18:42.520 --> 0:18:45.240
<v Speaker 1>exchange for us not getting in the way of your project.

0:18:45.440 --> 0:18:50.200
<v Speaker 1>When you say this energy goes elsewhere, that's the reality.

0:18:50.240 --> 0:18:53.280
<v Speaker 1>It goes elsewhere. They don't get it they don't get

0:18:53.320 --> 0:18:56.359
<v Speaker 1>to wet their beak. As we say in the mafia.

0:18:57.440 --> 0:19:00.960
<v Speaker 2>It's tricky to answer that question. It does. Like the

0:19:01.080 --> 0:19:04.520
<v Speaker 2>very simple way that it could be stated is, yeah,

0:19:04.560 --> 0:19:07.480
<v Speaker 2>it goes elsewhere. This is like large scale renewable energy

0:19:07.560 --> 0:19:13.000
<v Speaker 2>being generated to send and be purchased by companies. Yeah, exactly.

0:19:13.480 --> 0:19:15.880
<v Speaker 2>But you know, as I've heard the Bureau of Land

0:19:15.880 --> 0:19:18.000
<v Speaker 2>Management and other people say, like once you get the

0:19:18.040 --> 0:19:20.560
<v Speaker 2>electrons in the transmission line, that you can't really parse

0:19:20.600 --> 0:19:22.399
<v Speaker 2>it out in those ways. So there is a you know,

0:19:22.480 --> 0:19:27.800
<v Speaker 2>obviously there is local energy being generated and used in Baby,

0:19:27.880 --> 0:19:29.720
<v Speaker 2>So I assume they get some of it, but.

0:19:29.840 --> 0:19:32.560
<v Speaker 1>It feels like maybe they should get more of it.

0:19:32.760 --> 0:19:34.440
<v Speaker 2>Maybe they should get more of it. Yeah, I don't

0:19:34.480 --> 0:19:36.960
<v Speaker 2>I don't think. I don't know. I mean, I think,

0:19:37.000 --> 0:19:39.560
<v Speaker 2>you know, again, the bigger question for them is what

0:19:39.720 --> 0:19:42.600
<v Speaker 2>is the economy of this town, And for them, this

0:19:42.760 --> 0:19:46.120
<v Speaker 2>kind of tourism model seems to have a better long

0:19:46.200 --> 0:19:48.920
<v Speaker 2>term future for them, and it makes them less reliant

0:19:48.920 --> 0:19:51.439
<v Speaker 2>on a company that may be kind of here today,

0:19:51.480 --> 0:19:55.280
<v Speaker 2>gone tomorrow. Renewable energy not just solar, but also things

0:19:55.320 --> 0:19:58.000
<v Speaker 2>like lithium and geothermal, Like there's a lot of speculation.

0:19:58.160 --> 0:20:00.679
<v Speaker 2>You know, it's a new in just and so there

0:20:00.680 --> 0:20:02.960
<v Speaker 2>are many companies that are trying to get their hands

0:20:02.960 --> 0:20:05.720
<v Speaker 2>in it. And some of them are good and stable

0:20:05.840 --> 0:20:08.600
<v Speaker 2>and some of them are not. And so they yeah,

0:20:08.640 --> 0:20:10.600
<v Speaker 2>they I think they worry about, you know, becoming a

0:20:10.640 --> 0:20:13.080
<v Speaker 2>new company town basically, and then the company folds.

0:20:13.080 --> 0:20:16.760
<v Speaker 1>And then do you like writing? I do like writing? Yeah, yeah,

0:20:16.760 --> 0:20:18.960
<v Speaker 1>Because I'm not saying this to be kind. What really

0:20:18.960 --> 0:20:20.840
<v Speaker 1>hooked me was that this is such so well written,

0:20:20.840 --> 0:20:23.040
<v Speaker 1>this piece you did you mean you're writing? It is fantastic.

0:20:23.280 --> 0:20:26.879
<v Speaker 1>And I'm an old Harper's junkie. Louis Lappham is an

0:20:26.920 --> 0:20:29.760
<v Speaker 1>old old friend of mine, and I don't mean old chronologically,

0:20:29.760 --> 0:20:32.280
<v Speaker 1>which he's old chronologically too, but he's a dear friend

0:20:32.280 --> 0:20:35.159
<v Speaker 1>of mine. So I'm a big Harper's reader. What are

0:20:35.200 --> 0:20:36.120
<v Speaker 1>you working on now.

0:20:36.080 --> 0:20:37.760
<v Speaker 2>I'm working at a book. So I'm working at a

0:20:37.760 --> 0:20:40.960
<v Speaker 2>book on public lands and the energy transition, so basically

0:20:41.040 --> 0:20:45.000
<v Speaker 2>looking at the future of public lands in some ways

0:20:45.000 --> 0:20:47.320
<v Speaker 2>that we've just talked about, like basically, climate change is

0:20:47.359 --> 0:20:51.320
<v Speaker 2>this moment of large scale transformation. Old infrastructure systems are crumbling,

0:20:51.480 --> 0:20:55.720
<v Speaker 2>old ways of doing life on Earth are crumbling, and

0:20:55.760 --> 0:20:58.720
<v Speaker 2>we're building a bunch of new systems. So I'm curious about,

0:20:58.800 --> 0:21:01.440
<v Speaker 2>you know, how that's happening and whether we are actually

0:21:01.480 --> 0:21:03.359
<v Speaker 2>able to kind of change the way we do things,

0:21:03.440 --> 0:21:06.640
<v Speaker 2>change the political economy, change the relationship to the environment

0:21:07.119 --> 0:21:09.600
<v Speaker 2>in fundamental ways. I just want to say one thing.

0:21:09.720 --> 0:21:11.600
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to invite myself to say one thing before

0:21:11.600 --> 0:21:14.480
<v Speaker 2>we sign off, which is, you know, as an urban sociologist,

0:21:14.560 --> 0:21:16.960
<v Speaker 2>a lot of what my work was about was looking

0:21:17.000 --> 0:21:20.440
<v Speaker 2>at kind of the decisions we made in the name

0:21:20.480 --> 0:21:23.800
<v Speaker 2>of nature that were not sound decisions environmentally, Right Like,

0:21:23.840 --> 0:21:26.760
<v Speaker 2>we often oppose housing construction because we want to preserve

0:21:26.840 --> 0:21:29.760
<v Speaker 2>open space, but in not building housing, we push people out,

0:21:29.800 --> 0:21:33.840
<v Speaker 2>out and out and out, We increase commuting, we increase emissions, right,

0:21:33.880 --> 0:21:36.720
<v Speaker 2>we fragment habitats, you know, and that kind of thing.

0:21:37.000 --> 0:21:38.760
<v Speaker 2>So I think this is a similar thing, right Like,

0:21:38.840 --> 0:21:41.000
<v Speaker 2>we need to decarbonize, we need to do it fast.

0:21:41.040 --> 0:21:43.040
<v Speaker 2>We're in the middle of climate crisis, but there are

0:21:44.480 --> 0:21:48.920
<v Speaker 2>multiple there are you know, competing issues here, including habitat

0:21:48.960 --> 0:21:52.439
<v Speaker 2>and biodiversity crisis, and in using this land for scholar,

0:21:52.520 --> 0:21:54.359
<v Speaker 2>I think we are sort of failing to think about

0:21:54.359 --> 0:21:58.439
<v Speaker 2>the big picture of all of the environmental challenges that

0:21:58.480 --> 0:22:02.080
<v Speaker 2>we're currently facing, different ways to solve them. Well, thank

0:22:02.119 --> 0:22:04.680
<v Speaker 2>you very much, Thanks so much, thank you. That's a pleasure.

0:22:07.840 --> 0:22:13.200
<v Speaker 1>Institute for Advanced Study scholar Hillary Angelo my next guest.

0:22:13.359 --> 0:22:17.520
<v Speaker 1>San Jose State University Professor Dustin mulvaney is the author

0:22:17.640 --> 0:22:23.520
<v Speaker 1>of Solar Power, Innovation, Sustainability, and Environmental Justice, and he

0:22:23.600 --> 0:22:27.320
<v Speaker 1>is also a source for the article Boomtown. I was

0:22:27.400 --> 0:22:30.080
<v Speaker 1>curious to learn what the people of NY County know

0:22:30.280 --> 0:22:35.120
<v Speaker 1>and understand about our climate crisis timeline and the sacrifice

0:22:35.200 --> 0:22:36.720
<v Speaker 1>that is being asked of them.

0:22:37.920 --> 0:22:42.400
<v Speaker 4>I do think that these communities have a long history

0:22:42.680 --> 0:22:47.440
<v Speaker 4>with extractive industries, and I think that that's the lens

0:22:47.520 --> 0:22:51.760
<v Speaker 4>through which they're interpreting a lot of the land us

0:22:51.840 --> 0:22:54.240
<v Speaker 4>change that might be coming their way and is already

0:22:54.240 --> 0:22:58.320
<v Speaker 4>coming their way for solar development. These folks who live

0:22:58.359 --> 0:23:02.000
<v Speaker 4>out there tend to be very tuned into the natural world,

0:23:02.200 --> 0:23:06.000
<v Speaker 4>so to speak, the desert ecosystem, and they know things

0:23:06.040 --> 0:23:09.000
<v Speaker 4>are changing. I have a sense that they they're familiar

0:23:09.080 --> 0:23:15.160
<v Speaker 4>with the climate change overarching challenge that we're all facing.

0:23:16.240 --> 0:23:19.480
<v Speaker 4>I think that they just have had these experiences where

0:23:20.160 --> 0:23:23.120
<v Speaker 4>when let's say, you know, a major city like Las

0:23:23.200 --> 0:23:26.399
<v Speaker 4>Vegas or Los Angeles needs a dump, they go to

0:23:26.440 --> 0:23:29.960
<v Speaker 4>the desert. When they need lithium, like they need today,

0:23:30.000 --> 0:23:31.720
<v Speaker 4>where do they go? They go to the desert. Where

0:23:31.720 --> 0:23:35.480
<v Speaker 4>do they need in this case, lots of sunshine. You know,

0:23:35.520 --> 0:23:39.639
<v Speaker 4>they feel like their resources are being somewhat squandered in

0:23:39.680 --> 0:23:43.520
<v Speaker 4>the sense that they also look around and see areas

0:23:43.560 --> 0:23:47.080
<v Speaker 4>that are disturbed, meaning they're not just living in these

0:23:47.160 --> 0:23:51.119
<v Speaker 4>rural areas that are rich ecosystems. They're living in a

0:23:51.200 --> 0:23:55.119
<v Speaker 4>rich ecosystem that also has pockets of extractivism all over it.

0:23:55.160 --> 0:23:57.840
<v Speaker 4>There's mining all over the California Desert. There has been

0:23:57.880 --> 0:23:58.720
<v Speaker 4>for a long time.

0:23:59.160 --> 0:24:00.440
<v Speaker 1>What are they mining were now?

0:24:00.480 --> 0:24:05.119
<v Speaker 4>Primarily there's gold mining, there's silver mining in Nevada. The

0:24:05.119 --> 0:24:07.600
<v Speaker 4>there's new mining projects that are being proposed in and

0:24:07.640 --> 0:24:11.080
<v Speaker 4>around the area where the solar development's happening as well.

0:24:11.160 --> 0:24:14.280
<v Speaker 4>Lithium mining. We have somewhere on the order of last

0:24:14.280 --> 0:24:17.320
<v Speaker 4>I checked, it was something like seventeen thousand plaster claims

0:24:17.359 --> 0:24:20.800
<v Speaker 4>for lithium in the state of Nevada, which is you know, lithium.

0:24:21.359 --> 0:24:24.800
<v Speaker 4>That's another major challenge, right we don't right now have

0:24:24.920 --> 0:24:28.639
<v Speaker 4>the supplies of lithium to get to the electrification of

0:24:28.720 --> 0:24:31.680
<v Speaker 4>vehicles that we are hoping to see in the future.

0:24:32.480 --> 0:24:35.560
<v Speaker 4>So I guess the way I think some of these

0:24:35.560 --> 0:24:39.680
<v Speaker 4>communities are seeing what they're being asked to sacrifice here,

0:24:40.400 --> 0:24:43.120
<v Speaker 4>they see it as somewhat of a false choice because

0:24:43.440 --> 0:24:46.480
<v Speaker 4>if you zoom out of the Mohave Desert and the

0:24:46.560 --> 0:24:50.560
<v Speaker 4>areas of the Colorado Desert, which is southern California, if

0:24:50.600 --> 0:24:53.040
<v Speaker 4>you zoom out, there's a lot of agriculture there. You know,

0:24:53.040 --> 0:24:55.879
<v Speaker 4>if you look at blythe a major city on the

0:24:55.920 --> 0:25:02.880
<v Speaker 4>Colorado River, they're growing lots of alfalfa for export for horses. Now,

0:25:02.920 --> 0:25:07.560
<v Speaker 4>those are opportunities to cite solar farms in these agricultural

0:25:07.600 --> 0:25:09.080
<v Speaker 4>areas the Imperial Valley.

0:25:09.280 --> 0:25:11.800
<v Speaker 1>So in an area where there's a lot of agriculture,

0:25:12.320 --> 0:25:15.639
<v Speaker 1>the solar is built adjacent to that. It's land that

0:25:15.680 --> 0:25:18.600
<v Speaker 1>they're not farmingland. It was one of the conditions there

0:25:18.920 --> 0:25:21.720
<v Speaker 1>that makes it less problematic for them.

0:25:22.359 --> 0:25:25.520
<v Speaker 4>Well, the key thing is the habitat. So you know,

0:25:25.520 --> 0:25:29.000
<v Speaker 4>when we're talking about the controversies in this particular region

0:25:29.080 --> 0:25:32.000
<v Speaker 4>of California and Nevada, the controversies are usually around the

0:25:32.000 --> 0:25:35.480
<v Speaker 4>public lands, and these public lands have been in conservation

0:25:35.560 --> 0:25:40.359
<v Speaker 4>by default because they have never been developed. So that

0:25:40.400 --> 0:25:43.280
<v Speaker 4>means that they're very good habitat for desert tortoise, which

0:25:43.320 --> 0:25:46.400
<v Speaker 4>we've lost almost ninety percent of that population of that animal,

0:25:46.520 --> 0:25:49.239
<v Speaker 4>that species that's been in that area since there were

0:25:49.240 --> 0:25:52.320
<v Speaker 4>sabertoothed cats, right, that species has been there for a

0:25:52.320 --> 0:25:55.439
<v Speaker 4>long time, and now we're we're damaging its habitat. So

0:25:55.480 --> 0:25:58.680
<v Speaker 4>when a solar farm is cited in agricultural areas, it's

0:25:58.760 --> 0:26:02.320
<v Speaker 4>usually a decision made by that farmer to convert either

0:26:02.359 --> 0:26:05.280
<v Speaker 4>out of agriculture or maybe you know, in some cases,

0:26:05.320 --> 0:26:07.800
<v Speaker 4>Blithe and the Imperial Value are going to be asked

0:26:07.840 --> 0:26:11.760
<v Speaker 4>to retire land because we're over extracting water from the

0:26:11.760 --> 0:26:15.240
<v Speaker 4>Colorado River as well. So there's this opportunity to kind

0:26:15.240 --> 0:26:19.639
<v Speaker 4>of put that puzzle together. As agricultural lands are retired,

0:26:19.760 --> 0:26:22.920
<v Speaker 4>maybe those are the opportunities to put the solar farms

0:26:23.200 --> 0:26:25.679
<v Speaker 4>because you don't damage the habitat.

0:26:26.080 --> 0:26:29.439
<v Speaker 1>And when you say damage the habitat, when you have

0:26:30.440 --> 0:26:35.720
<v Speaker 1>these installations in these places and quote unquote habitat is disturbed,

0:26:36.200 --> 0:26:39.639
<v Speaker 1>are they talking about one or the other of boat

0:26:39.800 --> 0:26:43.800
<v Speaker 1>or both of habitat for wildlife? You talk about the

0:26:43.840 --> 0:26:48.040
<v Speaker 1>tortoises and so forth are not necessarily baby in Nevada,

0:26:48.040 --> 0:26:51.399
<v Speaker 1>but are different areas worried about. They want things left

0:26:51.560 --> 0:26:56.080
<v Speaker 1>absolutely pristine and you know natural or is it They

0:26:56.160 --> 0:26:58.040
<v Speaker 1>want to be able to tear it up with an

0:26:58.080 --> 0:27:02.359
<v Speaker 1>ATV and have a dirt bike track. And there's cultural

0:27:02.520 --> 0:27:07.600
<v Speaker 1>imperatives and there's preferences they have that are not necessarily

0:27:07.960 --> 0:27:10.960
<v Speaker 1>in harmony with nature. Is it a combination of both.

0:27:11.680 --> 0:27:17.520
<v Speaker 4>It is a combination of multiple factors, partly because the

0:27:17.560 --> 0:27:20.440
<v Speaker 4>public lands system, which is managed by the Bureau of

0:27:20.480 --> 0:27:24.920
<v Speaker 4>Land Management in the Department of Interior, is the one

0:27:25.400 --> 0:27:30.080
<v Speaker 4>federal agency without a mission, meaning the National Park Service

0:27:30.080 --> 0:27:33.080
<v Speaker 4>has a mission to provide park services and get people

0:27:33.320 --> 0:27:36.960
<v Speaker 4>to see nature. The Forest Service has a mission to

0:27:37.040 --> 0:27:40.359
<v Speaker 4>manage sustainable yield of forests in some places and manage

0:27:40.400 --> 0:27:43.520
<v Speaker 4>wildernesses and others. But the Bureau of Land Management has

0:27:43.640 --> 0:27:48.240
<v Speaker 4>multiple priorities. Conservation is one of them, but energy development

0:27:48.320 --> 0:27:53.959
<v Speaker 4>is another, mining is another, Recreational ATV use is another.

0:27:54.440 --> 0:28:00.760
<v Speaker 4>So in some ways this controversy embodies the challe faced

0:28:00.800 --> 0:28:03.800
<v Speaker 4>by this federal agency since it was developed. You know,

0:28:03.840 --> 0:28:07.399
<v Speaker 4>the history of that agency is the General Land Office

0:28:07.720 --> 0:28:11.840
<v Speaker 4>was a federal agency that gave away land for development

0:28:11.840 --> 0:28:14.760
<v Speaker 4>the Homestead Act. As the West was settled, the General

0:28:14.840 --> 0:28:18.080
<v Speaker 4>Land Office offered out these lands for if you were

0:28:18.320 --> 0:28:21.520
<v Speaker 4>going to develop these lands and work them, farm them,

0:28:21.760 --> 0:28:25.119
<v Speaker 4>you could have it. And the desert areas were not farmable,

0:28:26.000 --> 0:28:28.600
<v Speaker 4>so the General Land Office could never give away these lands.

0:28:28.600 --> 0:28:30.600
<v Speaker 4>In fact, in the nineteen twenties, the Bureau Land Management

0:28:30.600 --> 0:28:33.560
<v Speaker 4>tried to give away lands back to the states and

0:28:33.600 --> 0:28:36.879
<v Speaker 4>that didn't happen. So the General Land Office gets merged

0:28:36.880 --> 0:28:40.480
<v Speaker 4>with a grazing agency, and that's the land that the

0:28:40.480 --> 0:28:44.440
<v Speaker 4>Bureau Land Management manages today. It's the nation's largest landlord.

0:28:44.480 --> 0:28:47.560
<v Speaker 4>It manages two hundred and fifty million acres across the West,

0:28:47.880 --> 0:28:51.360
<v Speaker 4>and it manages for all these different activities. Take the

0:28:51.360 --> 0:28:54.960
<v Speaker 4>desert tortoise again for an example. The desert tortoise. We

0:28:55.000 --> 0:28:59.640
<v Speaker 4>spend more money conserving that species than grizzly bear, bald eagle,

0:28:59.760 --> 0:29:04.280
<v Speaker 4>and gray wolf combined. So that species we make a

0:29:04.320 --> 0:29:07.440
<v Speaker 4>lot of federal investments in it. And on the flip side,

0:29:07.520 --> 0:29:11.360
<v Speaker 4>we've now permitted somewhere on the order of ten gigawatts

0:29:11.800 --> 0:29:13.840
<v Speaker 4>of solar on public lands. That's more than any other

0:29:13.880 --> 0:29:16.360
<v Speaker 4>state has, So that means that there's this kind of

0:29:16.400 --> 0:29:20.760
<v Speaker 4>inevitable clash of conservation because those lands were never developed.

0:29:21.440 --> 0:29:24.040
<v Speaker 4>And the Energy Policy Act of two thousand and five

0:29:24.440 --> 0:29:26.480
<v Speaker 4>was actually the biggest energy law that we had until

0:29:26.520 --> 0:29:29.480
<v Speaker 4>this most recent inflation Reduction Act. So the Energy Policy

0:29:29.520 --> 0:29:33.640
<v Speaker 4>Act of two thousand and five mandated that the Bureau

0:29:33.680 --> 0:29:38.000
<v Speaker 4>of Land Management develop for solar and the idea there

0:29:38.880 --> 0:29:42.240
<v Speaker 4>was partly, hey, we've been given out public lands for coal,

0:29:42.320 --> 0:29:44.800
<v Speaker 4>oil and gas for all these years. Now it's the

0:29:44.840 --> 0:29:49.000
<v Speaker 4>solar and other renewables industries turned to have the public lands.

0:29:51.600 --> 0:29:55.960
<v Speaker 1>Professor Dustin mulvaney, if you're enjoying this conversation, don't keep

0:29:56.000 --> 0:29:59.160
<v Speaker 1>it to yourself, Tell a friend and follow here's the

0:29:59.200 --> 0:30:03.480
<v Speaker 1>thing on the heart radio app, Spotify or wherever you

0:30:03.600 --> 0:30:08.640
<v Speaker 1>get your podcasts. When we come back, Dustin Mulveny shares

0:30:08.680 --> 0:30:12.160
<v Speaker 1>a potential way to move forward for the communities that

0:30:12.240 --> 0:30:26.600
<v Speaker 1>will be affected by solar expansion. I'm Alec Baldwin and

0:30:26.640 --> 0:30:31.040
<v Speaker 1>this is here's the thing. Dustin Mulveny's research focuses on

0:30:31.120 --> 0:30:36.040
<v Speaker 1>the production of emerging technologies and their environmental impact, and

0:30:36.240 --> 0:30:41.840
<v Speaker 1>specifically solar energy commodity chains. I wanted Mulveny to share

0:30:42.000 --> 0:30:45.520
<v Speaker 1>what if any dangerous byproducts we might have to worry

0:30:45.560 --> 0:30:49.000
<v Speaker 1>about from the expansion of the solar industry.

0:30:49.760 --> 0:30:53.000
<v Speaker 4>So solar doesn't seem to have the same level of

0:30:53.760 --> 0:30:57.680
<v Speaker 4>challenges that batteries do up the supply chain. The key

0:30:57.800 --> 0:31:00.920
<v Speaker 4>ingredient for solar panel is quartz. Most of the solar

0:31:00.920 --> 0:31:03.960
<v Speaker 4>panels made out of glass, so by weight, quartz goes

0:31:04.000 --> 0:31:07.160
<v Speaker 4>into that glass, but there's a semiconductor grade quartz that's

0:31:07.280 --> 0:31:11.440
<v Speaker 4>mined and that's turned into a very very pure type

0:31:11.440 --> 0:31:14.200
<v Speaker 4>of silicon that eventually becomes the wafers that you see

0:31:14.680 --> 0:31:19.240
<v Speaker 4>in a solar cell. The key metal that is interesting

0:31:19.280 --> 0:31:22.680
<v Speaker 4>that the solar industry uses is silver. So on a

0:31:22.720 --> 0:31:25.920
<v Speaker 4>given year, the solar industry uses somewhere around fifteen percent

0:31:25.960 --> 0:31:29.400
<v Speaker 4>of the global silver supply, which is quite incredible. Now.

0:31:29.440 --> 0:31:34.920
<v Speaker 4>That is also interestingly hasn't led to an increase in

0:31:35.040 --> 0:31:40.840
<v Speaker 4>silver mining, partly because of the photo industry going away.

0:31:41.280 --> 0:31:46.160
<v Speaker 4>Silver was widely used in developing photographs, and that supply

0:31:46.560 --> 0:31:50.960
<v Speaker 4>basically now has kind of slid over to the solar industry,

0:31:51.480 --> 0:31:55.640
<v Speaker 4>not the direct supply, but has basically substituted that demand

0:31:55.680 --> 0:31:59.400
<v Speaker 4>over time. So a solar panels a somewhat simple technology

0:31:59.600 --> 0:32:03.560
<v Speaker 4>which poses some challenges for recycling. So that means that

0:32:03.640 --> 0:32:08.720
<v Speaker 4>like the solar panels not very valuable inside problematic elements

0:32:08.800 --> 0:32:11.200
<v Speaker 4>that are in a solar panel might be lead at

0:32:11.200 --> 0:32:12.640
<v Speaker 4>the end of its life, there's a little bit of

0:32:12.720 --> 0:32:14.600
<v Speaker 4>lead in the sod or it's not like a television

0:32:14.600 --> 0:32:16.600
<v Speaker 4>set that has a real lot of lead in it.

0:32:16.640 --> 0:32:21.400
<v Speaker 4>But that's probably the exposure of concern. For example, if

0:32:21.400 --> 0:32:24.120
<v Speaker 4>you're recycling solar panels, they've recycled ninety five percent of

0:32:24.120 --> 0:32:25.240
<v Speaker 4>their solar panels in Europe.

0:32:25.240 --> 0:32:29.280
<v Speaker 1>By the way, cadmium as an element in solar panels,

0:32:29.360 --> 0:32:30.560
<v Speaker 1>what role does that play.

0:32:31.160 --> 0:32:35.240
<v Speaker 4>So there are two major types of solar panels. Most

0:32:35.280 --> 0:32:38.480
<v Speaker 4>of them ninety five percent of them are crystalline silicon,

0:32:38.880 --> 0:32:41.640
<v Speaker 4>so they rely on that quartz and that very very

0:32:41.680 --> 0:32:47.240
<v Speaker 4>refined silicon. There's a different technology, a technology actually people

0:32:47.320 --> 0:32:52.440
<v Speaker 4>thought would be more widespread today, which is called thin film.

0:32:52.720 --> 0:32:56.280
<v Speaker 4>The silicon ones are exceptionally thin, but these thin films

0:32:56.320 --> 0:32:58.800
<v Speaker 4>are actually like one hundred times thinner. They're on the

0:32:58.920 --> 0:33:01.920
<v Speaker 4>order of one hundred nanem of thickness, and those are

0:33:01.920 --> 0:33:05.920
<v Speaker 4>the semiconductor layers that generate the electricity. So there's one

0:33:05.960 --> 0:33:11.720
<v Speaker 4>major manufacture of cadmium telluride solar panels, and that is

0:33:11.760 --> 0:33:16.000
<v Speaker 4>a thin film technology that is based on cadmium compounds,

0:33:16.080 --> 0:33:19.480
<v Speaker 4>so there's no quurts in that technology at all. It's

0:33:19.520 --> 0:33:25.200
<v Speaker 4>literally a totally different solar technology. The materials are totally different.

0:33:25.760 --> 0:33:29.200
<v Speaker 1>Now in France where recently they ruled that you have

0:33:29.280 --> 0:33:34.280
<v Speaker 1>to have a solar on every new parking structure that

0:33:34.440 --> 0:33:36.720
<v Speaker 1>is built, and we have a little bit of that

0:33:36.800 --> 0:33:40.520
<v Speaker 1>in this country. Without getting too political, Where in the

0:33:40.800 --> 0:33:44.640
<v Speaker 1>triptich of what I understand in terms of the menu

0:33:44.720 --> 0:33:47.959
<v Speaker 1>of renewable energy, where does geothermal fit in and does

0:33:48.000 --> 0:33:52.080
<v Speaker 1>it really work? Is geothermal something to your understanding, something

0:33:52.240 --> 0:33:56.960
<v Speaker 1>that only works site specific meaning your home. You drill

0:33:57.080 --> 0:34:01.160
<v Speaker 1>a geothermal well to provide certain resource is heating and cooling,

0:34:01.240 --> 0:34:04.040
<v Speaker 1>but it only works on a house by house basis.

0:34:04.320 --> 0:34:07.760
<v Speaker 1>Or are there is there the potential for geothermal to

0:34:07.800 --> 0:34:10.080
<v Speaker 1>work in the utility sense?

0:34:10.960 --> 0:34:14.400
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, so you're describing kind of the two different types

0:34:14.440 --> 0:34:19.759
<v Speaker 4>of geothermal. There is a household level heating cooling geothermal

0:34:19.800 --> 0:34:23.520
<v Speaker 4>where there's no electricity generation involved unless there's a heat

0:34:23.520 --> 0:34:27.480
<v Speaker 4>pump associated with that, which could be the case. Geothermal

0:34:27.680 --> 0:34:30.839
<v Speaker 4>at the utility scale is very location specific because it's

0:34:30.880 --> 0:34:35.239
<v Speaker 4>taking very hot steam or hot water and bringing it

0:34:35.320 --> 0:34:39.319
<v Speaker 4>up to the surface to turn a turbine. So there

0:34:39.400 --> 0:34:43.359
<v Speaker 4>are some advances that people are talking about enhanced geothermal

0:34:43.760 --> 0:34:48.280
<v Speaker 4>where they essentially go deeper and they may even fracture

0:34:48.320 --> 0:34:51.959
<v Speaker 4>some rock, some of that heat source rock that's down low,

0:34:52.120 --> 0:34:54.839
<v Speaker 4>to increase its surface area to get a little more

0:34:55.080 --> 0:34:57.759
<v Speaker 4>steam out of it. But that is certainly another area

0:34:57.800 --> 0:35:01.000
<v Speaker 4>that's growing right now. Geothermal power is growing and it

0:35:01.040 --> 0:35:03.760
<v Speaker 4>also has the potential to provide some other resources as well,

0:35:04.000 --> 0:35:07.640
<v Speaker 4>So not just generating electricity from these power plants, but

0:35:08.120 --> 0:35:11.719
<v Speaker 4>district heating, so you could potentially so geothermal tends to

0:35:11.800 --> 0:35:15.640
<v Speaker 4>have a lot of waste water cooling water associated with it,

0:35:15.840 --> 0:35:20.759
<v Speaker 4>so you could potentially deliver just like we have our

0:35:20.880 --> 0:35:23.839
<v Speaker 4>water systems in our under our streets, you could have

0:35:24.120 --> 0:35:27.919
<v Speaker 4>a geothermal hot water system linked under the seats. In fact,

0:35:27.920 --> 0:35:30.560
<v Speaker 4>New York City has the largest i think district steam

0:35:30.600 --> 0:35:32.640
<v Speaker 4>system in yes, so you could do that.

0:35:33.400 --> 0:35:35.680
<v Speaker 1>What are some of the byproducts as well? It seems

0:35:35.680 --> 0:35:41.239
<v Speaker 1>like every time we address a problem, renewable energy as

0:35:41.280 --> 0:35:43.880
<v Speaker 1>an attempt to address a problem, and every time we

0:35:43.960 --> 0:35:46.520
<v Speaker 1>do that, not that we have an equivalent number of

0:35:46.560 --> 0:35:49.440
<v Speaker 1>problems we create, but we create some. What are some

0:35:49.520 --> 0:35:51.920
<v Speaker 1>of the problems as far as you're concerned that the

0:35:52.040 --> 0:35:55.840
<v Speaker 1>move to solar, that the build out of the solar future,

0:35:56.160 --> 0:35:58.160
<v Speaker 1>what are some of the problems that result from that.

0:35:58.600 --> 0:36:02.080
<v Speaker 4>Well, there are man issues, as I mentioned at the

0:36:02.200 --> 0:36:05.200
<v Speaker 4>end of life, I think that are important. There are

0:36:05.640 --> 0:36:11.200
<v Speaker 4>chemical stewardship questions around some of the very easy to

0:36:11.200 --> 0:36:16.040
<v Speaker 4>deal with chemicals. The industry actually doesn't use extremely toxic materials.

0:36:16.040 --> 0:36:20.120
<v Speaker 4>It uses materials that could be relatively easily treated even

0:36:20.120 --> 0:36:24.200
<v Speaker 4>in regular municipal wastewater treatment facilities in some cases, so

0:36:25.000 --> 0:36:27.759
<v Speaker 4>I'm not overly worried about that, I'll be honest, I

0:36:27.800 --> 0:36:30.520
<v Speaker 4>think the big issue is the land issue. We really

0:36:30.640 --> 0:36:34.839
<v Speaker 4>are moving from subterranean energy resources where you just poke,

0:36:35.040 --> 0:36:36.480
<v Speaker 4>you build a pad and poke a hole in the

0:36:36.520 --> 0:36:41.520
<v Speaker 4>ground and get tremendous quantities of dense energy to a

0:36:41.640 --> 0:36:45.240
<v Speaker 4>very diffuse resource that does require a lot of space.

0:36:45.719 --> 0:36:48.239
<v Speaker 1>But as far as I'm concerned, if I may, when

0:36:48.239 --> 0:36:50.040
<v Speaker 1>you make that point, the first thing that comes to

0:36:50.080 --> 0:36:52.080
<v Speaker 1>mind for me is you poke a hole in the

0:36:52.120 --> 0:36:58.000
<v Speaker 1>ground and you have presumably less damage to the crust

0:36:58.040 --> 0:37:00.960
<v Speaker 1>if you will to the exterior, But once that stuff

0:37:01.000 --> 0:37:03.480
<v Speaker 1>comes out of the ground, it more than makes up

0:37:03.480 --> 0:37:06.759
<v Speaker 1>for it and the toxicity and the damage it creates. Absolutely,

0:37:06.880 --> 0:37:09.759
<v Speaker 1>we punch a few holes in the ground, we inject

0:37:09.880 --> 0:37:13.560
<v Speaker 1>water into rock formations and force gas out with God

0:37:13.640 --> 0:37:17.280
<v Speaker 1>knows what the byproduct of that is. Who really knows

0:37:17.760 --> 0:37:21.200
<v Speaker 1>what the long term consequences of fracking are nobody, But

0:37:21.320 --> 0:37:26.319
<v Speaker 1>the resultant energy is far more what we want. Do

0:37:26.400 --> 0:37:27.239
<v Speaker 1>you see it that way?

0:37:27.840 --> 0:37:31.319
<v Speaker 4>I agree with that. Where I try to take a

0:37:31.320 --> 0:37:34.680
<v Speaker 4>little different approach to that is to not think of

0:37:34.719 --> 0:37:38.520
<v Speaker 4>it as training off one bad energy for another bad energy.

0:37:39.360 --> 0:37:42.920
<v Speaker 4>Meaning it's absolutely the case that even if the worst

0:37:43.000 --> 0:37:46.799
<v Speaker 4>case land use, solar is still better than what we're

0:37:46.800 --> 0:37:48.880
<v Speaker 4>doing right now in terms of the level of fossil

0:37:48.880 --> 0:37:52.759
<v Speaker 4>fuel extraction. That's not the question, But the question is

0:37:52.760 --> 0:37:55.240
<v Speaker 4>how to do it better because we have so many

0:37:55.320 --> 0:37:58.680
<v Speaker 4>other alternatives. That's the one beauty of this solar technology

0:37:58.719 --> 0:38:01.080
<v Speaker 4>is that it's the only technologlogy we can live under

0:38:01.200 --> 0:38:04.480
<v Speaker 4>that generates electricity. It's the only technology that we can

0:38:04.560 --> 0:38:08.640
<v Speaker 4>integrate into the built environment. It's the only technology that

0:38:08.680 --> 0:38:13.360
<v Speaker 4>we could easily integrate into agricultural areas. So to some extent,

0:38:13.440 --> 0:38:17.880
<v Speaker 4>I think the challenge is exactly what how you framed

0:38:17.880 --> 0:38:20.400
<v Speaker 4>it at first, which is that we tend to silo

0:38:20.640 --> 0:38:24.680
<v Speaker 4>these issues. We're only thinking about solar development from the

0:38:24.800 --> 0:38:27.840
<v Speaker 4>narrow lens of carbon. We're just like in the past,

0:38:27.880 --> 0:38:30.360
<v Speaker 4>we'd clean up water. You know, when I lived in

0:38:30.400 --> 0:38:34.080
<v Speaker 4>New Jersey, I was a site engineer cleaning up MTBE

0:38:34.239 --> 0:38:38.680
<v Speaker 4>spills MTBs an additive and gasoline. And the way we

0:38:38.760 --> 0:38:41.160
<v Speaker 4>cleaned up the groundwater pollution based on the rules that

0:38:41.160 --> 0:38:43.040
<v Speaker 4>we're supposed to follow, was to put it in the

0:38:43.040 --> 0:38:45.919
<v Speaker 4>air in New York, So we just shift problems from

0:38:46.320 --> 0:38:49.000
<v Speaker 4>water problem to air problem. Air problem the water problem,

0:38:49.040 --> 0:38:53.440
<v Speaker 4>like we have acid rain from coal, right that we

0:38:53.960 --> 0:38:57.960
<v Speaker 4>somewhat solve that problem by taking the acid rain potential

0:38:58.040 --> 0:38:59.960
<v Speaker 4>out of the air. But now we have solid weight

0:39:00.320 --> 0:39:02.839
<v Speaker 4>problems and fly ash problems at all these coal fire

0:39:02.840 --> 0:39:06.280
<v Speaker 4>power plants because the scrubbers have collected all that toxic

0:39:06.280 --> 0:39:08.480
<v Speaker 4>stuff and now it's sitting at the coal plant. So

0:39:08.560 --> 0:39:11.360
<v Speaker 4>with the case of solar, we need to be thinking

0:39:11.800 --> 0:39:15.000
<v Speaker 4>more than just about like the trade offs on the

0:39:15.040 --> 0:39:17.759
<v Speaker 4>carbon question. We need to be thinking about how could

0:39:17.760 --> 0:39:20.880
<v Speaker 4>we build this in an integrative way where we're thinking

0:39:20.920 --> 0:39:24.200
<v Speaker 4>about water we're thinking about land, we're thinking about air

0:39:24.239 --> 0:39:27.520
<v Speaker 4>pollution at the same time, instead of trying to just

0:39:28.360 --> 0:39:30.360
<v Speaker 4>solve the carbon problem and then we'll figure out what

0:39:30.400 --> 0:39:31.799
<v Speaker 4>we'll do with the land problem later.

0:39:32.560 --> 0:39:35.319
<v Speaker 1>Typically, for what you'd see on its solar farm, how

0:39:35.360 --> 0:39:39.200
<v Speaker 1>long do solar panels last? If you're wondering if a

0:39:39.280 --> 0:39:43.279
<v Speaker 1>material that the urns generates energy is nonetheless banking in

0:39:43.320 --> 0:39:46.600
<v Speaker 1>the one hundred and twenty degree sun, a wind turbine

0:39:46.680 --> 0:39:49.600
<v Speaker 1>is out there in the ocean in salt water, and

0:39:49.640 --> 0:39:52.280
<v Speaker 1>how long do those last. Let's just stick with solar.

0:39:52.640 --> 0:39:54.240
<v Speaker 1>Solar panels typically last.

0:39:54.320 --> 0:39:58.440
<v Speaker 4>How long a typical solar panel is warranteed to last

0:39:58.440 --> 0:40:01.480
<v Speaker 4>twenty to twenty five years, So that's unlike any other

0:40:01.480 --> 0:40:03.880
<v Speaker 4>products that we really see. And the way the warranties

0:40:03.920 --> 0:40:06.640
<v Speaker 4>work is that they put out a certain amount of

0:40:06.719 --> 0:40:09.759
<v Speaker 4>power of their initial amount. So if you have one

0:40:09.800 --> 0:40:12.320
<v Speaker 4>hundred watts solar panel, it will put out eighty watts

0:40:12.360 --> 0:40:14.160
<v Speaker 4>by the end of its life twenty twenty five years.

0:40:14.160 --> 0:40:18.200
<v Speaker 4>Because impurities in those very hostile environments on your roof

0:40:18.280 --> 0:40:21.759
<v Speaker 4>in the desert, impurities creep into those solar cells and

0:40:21.800 --> 0:40:26.640
<v Speaker 4>that's what takes away their ability to generate power over time. However,

0:40:26.760 --> 0:40:31.440
<v Speaker 4>we've seen solar panels that are operating now fifty years,

0:40:31.880 --> 0:40:35.800
<v Speaker 4>so we certainly are seeing solar panels that are made

0:40:35.960 --> 0:40:38.480
<v Speaker 4>very very well. They go through all sorts of advanced

0:40:38.560 --> 0:40:43.839
<v Speaker 4>degradation tests, hail tests, corrosion tests, all sorts of tests

0:40:43.880 --> 0:40:46.520
<v Speaker 4>to make sure that they last a long time. In fact,

0:40:46.520 --> 0:40:48.319
<v Speaker 4>they have to do those in order to get to

0:40:48.480 --> 0:40:52.680
<v Speaker 4>ensure the warranties for the solar panels that they're selling.

0:40:53.040 --> 0:40:55.960
<v Speaker 1>What do you think is one step that we can

0:40:56.040 --> 0:40:59.440
<v Speaker 1>take that you think is triage? We need to do

0:40:59.520 --> 0:41:01.800
<v Speaker 1>this now. Now what do we need to do now?

0:41:02.440 --> 0:41:07.040
<v Speaker 4>I'll say two things. One, I think community ownership of

0:41:07.080 --> 0:41:10.239
<v Speaker 4>some of these assets is really critical. So it might

0:41:10.400 --> 0:41:14.880
<v Speaker 4>not be resolvable in its current situation, but we know that,

0:41:14.920 --> 0:41:17.480
<v Speaker 4>for example, when ranchers get together and they own the

0:41:17.480 --> 0:41:21.279
<v Speaker 4>wind farm, no one fights it. They all welcome it

0:41:21.320 --> 0:41:24.560
<v Speaker 4>because they're definitely they're going to receive direct benefit from that.

0:41:24.920 --> 0:41:27.239
<v Speaker 4>But I think it's really important to also note that

0:41:28.280 --> 0:41:31.680
<v Speaker 4>when we're talking about building out solar, the US will

0:41:31.680 --> 0:41:35.600
<v Speaker 4>need somewhere on the order between five thousand and fifteen

0:41:35.640 --> 0:41:39.880
<v Speaker 4>thousand square miles of solar to power its portion of

0:41:40.000 --> 0:41:44.120
<v Speaker 4>the great according to some modelers, so five to fifteen

0:41:44.440 --> 0:41:48.560
<v Speaker 4>square miles. We have three hundred thousand square miles of

0:41:48.640 --> 0:41:54.520
<v Speaker 4>brown fields, degraded lands, salt contaminated agricultural lands. All to

0:41:54.560 --> 0:41:59.160
<v Speaker 4>say that I've often I feel like this conservation versus

0:41:59.200 --> 0:42:03.479
<v Speaker 4>solar energy development is a false choice, because I think

0:42:03.520 --> 0:42:07.399
<v Speaker 4>there is a path forward where we could keep many

0:42:07.400 --> 0:42:10.240
<v Speaker 4>of the lands that we value for their conservation benefits,

0:42:10.239 --> 0:42:16.080
<v Speaker 4>for their cultural resources, and find the places where the

0:42:16.160 --> 0:42:19.879
<v Speaker 4>disturbed lands could be utilized because we have so much

0:42:19.920 --> 0:42:22.319
<v Speaker 4>of that already and we know that those projects don't

0:42:22.360 --> 0:42:23.600
<v Speaker 4>face any opposition.

0:42:24.400 --> 0:42:27.799
<v Speaker 1>Well, I want to say thank you so much. You

0:42:27.880 --> 0:42:31.760
<v Speaker 1>are so authoritative about this. It's been my great pleasure, truly,

0:42:32.200 --> 0:42:39.160
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much. My thanks to Dustin mulvaney and

0:42:39.280 --> 0:42:44.239
<v Speaker 1>Hilary Angelo. This episode was recorded at CDM Studios in

0:42:44.280 --> 0:42:48.120
<v Speaker 1>New York City, where produced by Kathleen Russo, Zach MacNeice,

0:42:48.200 --> 0:42:52.240
<v Speaker 1>and Maureen Hobin. Our engineer is Frank Imperial. Our social

0:42:52.360 --> 0:42:56.360
<v Speaker 1>media manager is Danielle Gingrich. I'm Alec Baldwin. Here's the

0:42:56.400 --> 0:43:12.520
<v Speaker 1>thing is brought to you by iHeart Radio.