WEBVTT - Luddism, part two. Ft. Andrew

0:00:01.760 --> 0:00:10.160
<v Speaker 1>Al Zone Media. Welcome back to happen Here.

0:00:10.680 --> 0:00:12.840
<v Speaker 2>I'm Andrew Sage and you can find my stuff on

0:00:12.880 --> 0:00:14.520
<v Speaker 2>my YouTube channel, Andrewism.

0:00:15.200 --> 0:00:17.279
<v Speaker 1>I'm joined once again by.

0:00:18.040 --> 0:00:22.560
<v Speaker 3>James getting no less a quid as we go, Behi, Andrew.

0:00:22.640 --> 0:00:25.360
<v Speaker 3>I'm excited to learn about what we're going to learn

0:00:25.360 --> 0:00:25.880
<v Speaker 3>about today.

0:00:26.600 --> 0:00:29.680
<v Speaker 2>Yes, we're picking up where we left off by tackling

0:00:30.320 --> 0:00:34.239
<v Speaker 2>the Luddites of today. In our previous episode, we unravel

0:00:34.280 --> 0:00:37.400
<v Speaker 2>the story of Luodites who sit against the encroaching forces

0:00:37.600 --> 0:00:41.320
<v Speaker 2>of the industrial revolution and more specifically the abuses of

0:00:41.400 --> 0:00:44.920
<v Speaker 2>workers by profit seeking capitalists. They were challenging the world

0:00:45.000 --> 0:00:48.120
<v Speaker 2>view of lazy fair capitalism with this increase in amalgamation

0:00:48.280 --> 0:00:54.000
<v Speaker 2>of power, resources, and wealth, rationalized by its emphasis on progress. Today,

0:00:54.040 --> 0:00:56.160
<v Speaker 2>it seems this history as we've repeating itself as we

0:00:56.200 --> 0:00:59.720
<v Speaker 2>face a similar struggle against technological changes that come.

0:00:59.640 --> 0:01:01.520
<v Speaker 1>About to the detriment of workers.

0:01:01.840 --> 0:01:04.080
<v Speaker 2>As some tech has been used by tech companies in

0:01:04.160 --> 0:01:08.200
<v Speaker 2>various industries to drive down wages and worsen conditions for

0:01:08.480 --> 0:01:14.080
<v Speaker 2>common workers, say, for example, technological unemployment. For the rights

0:01:14.080 --> 0:01:17.240
<v Speaker 2>who once resist the encroachment machines would find their concerns

0:01:17.240 --> 0:01:20.360
<v Speaker 2>reflected in a modern world as a technological advanced ones

0:01:20.400 --> 0:01:22.920
<v Speaker 2>often come with the cost of those whose jobs can

0:01:22.959 --> 0:01:28.680
<v Speaker 2>be automated away. For instance, in the manufacturing industry, robots

0:01:28.680 --> 0:01:32.480
<v Speaker 2>and automated assembly lines of streamline production lead into increased

0:01:32.480 --> 0:01:36.520
<v Speaker 2>efficiency and lower costs for companies, but these efficiencies often

0:01:36.560 --> 0:01:40.560
<v Speaker 2>meant the displacement of human workers, and such as in manufacturing,

0:01:41.120 --> 0:01:46.040
<v Speaker 2>the ripple effects extend to various sectors like customer service, transportation,

0:01:46.560 --> 0:01:50.600
<v Speaker 2>and data analysis, and so there's this fere of job

0:01:50.720 --> 0:01:57.880
<v Speaker 2>displacement looms large. However, technological unemployment, which is the belief

0:01:57.920 --> 0:02:02.040
<v Speaker 2>that as technology advances, human jobs are at risk, potentially

0:02:02.120 --> 0:02:07.840
<v Speaker 2>dating to widespread unemployment, has been described by some economists

0:02:07.920 --> 0:02:11.519
<v Speaker 2>as a fallacy. Back in the early days of the

0:02:11.520 --> 0:02:14.959
<v Speaker 2>Industrial Revolution, when the advance of mechanization began transform in

0:02:15.040 --> 0:02:18.440
<v Speaker 2>various industries and with workers fear and automation would render

0:02:18.520 --> 0:02:22.160
<v Speaker 2>them job less and devalue their labor, the people took

0:02:22.160 --> 0:02:26.280
<v Speaker 2>a stand, but as time passed, new industries and job

0:02:26.320 --> 0:02:30.360
<v Speaker 2>opportunities emerged to replace some of the old ones, ultimately

0:02:30.480 --> 0:02:34.920
<v Speaker 2>absorbing that workforce. Fast forward to the twentieth century and

0:02:35.000 --> 0:02:38.760
<v Speaker 2>the rise of computers and automation technology reignited concerns about

0:02:38.800 --> 0:02:43.040
<v Speaker 2>technological unemployment, but again, new jobs were created in new industries.

0:02:43.919 --> 0:02:44.200
<v Speaker 1>Today.

0:02:44.200 --> 0:02:48.040
<v Speaker 2>The debate continues as artificial intelligence, robotics, and automation advance

0:02:48.080 --> 0:02:51.840
<v Speaker 2>at an unprecedented pace, and it remains to be seen

0:02:51.880 --> 0:02:54.640
<v Speaker 2>what the long term consequences of those technologies may be.

0:02:56.040 --> 0:02:58.240
<v Speaker 2>My position has really always been that we should be

0:02:58.240 --> 0:03:02.040
<v Speaker 2>working less anyway, but instead people are obsessed with creating

0:03:02.080 --> 0:03:05.280
<v Speaker 2>new jobs, even when they're unnecessary. See you know, of

0:03:05.320 --> 0:03:09.359
<v Speaker 2>course David Graeber is supposed jobs. But you know, even

0:03:09.400 --> 0:03:12.200
<v Speaker 2>if the idea of mass unemployment due to tech is

0:03:12.240 --> 0:03:15.680
<v Speaker 2>not true, if we end up replacing the jobs that

0:03:15.720 --> 0:03:17.880
<v Speaker 2>are e raised with new jobs. Whatever the case may be,

0:03:19.000 --> 0:03:24.559
<v Speaker 2>tech is nevertheless quite capable of destroying livelihoods, creating unintended consequences,

0:03:25.080 --> 0:03:28.240
<v Speaker 2>and further concentrating power in the hands of fewer and

0:03:28.320 --> 0:03:31.720
<v Speaker 2>fewer people. For every tech advance, whether that makes a

0:03:31.800 --> 0:03:35.560
<v Speaker 2>job more fulfilling and enjoyable, there are also those who

0:03:35.600 --> 0:03:38.480
<v Speaker 2>make it more tea us and grinding. I mean, yes,

0:03:38.560 --> 0:03:41.920
<v Speaker 2>tech can free us from some tasks. You know, accountants

0:03:41.960 --> 0:03:44.840
<v Speaker 2>have digital spreadsheets to make their lives much easier. For example,

0:03:45.400 --> 0:03:48.760
<v Speaker 2>writing is way easier now that the personal computers is

0:03:48.800 --> 0:03:54.560
<v Speaker 2>more common. But while technological progress can produce prosperity, there's

0:03:54.640 --> 0:03:57.440
<v Speaker 2>really no guarantee that the prosperity.

0:03:56.920 --> 0:03:58.320
<v Speaker 1>Will reach the workers.

0:03:59.120 --> 0:04:01.960
<v Speaker 2>In most cases, on the cut, it very clearly doesn't.

0:04:03.320 --> 0:04:06.240
<v Speaker 2>In fact, many of the benefits of the industrial revolution

0:04:07.040 --> 0:04:10.800
<v Speaker 2>were really not felt by the workers until decades later,

0:04:11.600 --> 0:04:14.080
<v Speaker 2>after many of them have been you know, crushed or

0:04:14.120 --> 0:04:17.560
<v Speaker 2>poisoned or killed or you know, died in a factory

0:04:17.560 --> 0:04:21.120
<v Speaker 2>fire or whatever they shut down when protesting, you know,

0:04:21.200 --> 0:04:23.279
<v Speaker 2>like that, they didn't see the benefits until much later on.

0:04:23.800 --> 0:04:26.640
<v Speaker 2>You know, it's not like, you know, these things introduced

0:04:26.680 --> 0:04:31.880
<v Speaker 2>and boom, everybody benefits. I mean even now, not everybody

0:04:31.880 --> 0:04:36.440
<v Speaker 2>in the world is benefiting from you know, the computer age.

0:04:36.560 --> 0:04:40.719
<v Speaker 2>There are still many people, like for example, in the Congo,

0:04:40.800 --> 0:04:46.920
<v Speaker 2>who are endurance, slavery and staves like conditions in order

0:04:47.000 --> 0:04:50.159
<v Speaker 2>to you know, procure the materials necessary for the computer

0:04:50.240 --> 0:04:54.320
<v Speaker 2>age totally, and yet they're not seeing those benefits and

0:04:54.440 --> 0:04:57.680
<v Speaker 2>arranged we're seeing when they'll see the benefits that many

0:04:57.720 --> 0:05:00.440
<v Speaker 2>of us enjoy in various parts of the world, and

0:05:00.680 --> 0:05:05.479
<v Speaker 2>particularly that there was enjoy in the global North in

0:05:05.560 --> 0:05:10.359
<v Speaker 2>our relentless pursuit of progress and technological advancement as defined

0:05:10.680 --> 0:05:15.240
<v Speaker 2>by capitalism, we also end up losing our nature, our community,

0:05:15.760 --> 0:05:20.119
<v Speaker 2>and in many cases are craftsmanship. I mean remember John Booth,

0:05:20.760 --> 0:05:22.800
<v Speaker 2>the one who had said can you keep a secret?

0:05:22.960 --> 0:05:25.920
<v Speaker 1>Or so can I? He has other words?

0:05:26.000 --> 0:05:27.960
<v Speaker 2>You know that the new machinery might be man's chief

0:05:28.000 --> 0:05:31.960
<v Speaker 2>blessing himself his curse if society were differently constituted.

0:05:32.680 --> 0:05:33.400
<v Speaker 1>That's where I have to.

0:05:33.320 --> 0:05:37.440
<v Speaker 2>Bring in the one and only the ls I've spoken

0:05:37.480 --> 0:05:41.000
<v Speaker 2>about him before, of course, the Austrian philosopher, the theologia

0:05:41.040 --> 0:05:42.679
<v Speaker 2>and the sort of everything.

0:05:42.720 --> 0:05:47.599
<v Speaker 1>Guy Ivan Ilich. Oh, yeah, fun times, fun times. Yeah.

0:05:47.600 --> 0:05:50.320
<v Speaker 2>He was a thinker ahead of his time. You know,

0:05:50.320 --> 0:05:52.839
<v Speaker 2>it's really strange in some of his positions, I think,

0:05:54.440 --> 0:05:59.080
<v Speaker 2>but a lot of his concepts resonate today in various movements.

0:06:00.160 --> 0:06:04.200
<v Speaker 2>One of the foundational concepts in the modern movement of

0:06:04.279 --> 0:06:09.520
<v Speaker 2>the growth is the concept of conviviality, which was redefined

0:06:09.640 --> 0:06:16.120
<v Speaker 2>and introduced in the context of our Tools in Ilish's

0:06:16.160 --> 0:06:21.320
<v Speaker 2>book Tools of Conviviality. Eligio's vision, as explored by the book,

0:06:21.520 --> 0:06:25.160
<v Speaker 2>is one in which technology serves humanity, not to plant it,

0:06:25.720 --> 0:06:31.000
<v Speaker 2>where convivial tools empower individuals and communities, fostering creativity and

0:06:31.040 --> 0:06:34.000
<v Speaker 2>autonomy while preventing the concentration of power in the hands

0:06:34.000 --> 0:06:39.920
<v Speaker 2>of the few. According to il conviviality is individual freedom

0:06:40.080 --> 0:06:44.880
<v Speaker 2>realized in personal interdependence. It's basically the ability of individuals

0:06:44.880 --> 0:06:49.320
<v Speaker 2>to interact and to interact creatively and autonomously with others

0:06:49.360 --> 0:06:52.960
<v Speaker 2>and the environment to satisfy their individual and collective needs.

0:06:54.040 --> 0:06:57.520
<v Speaker 2>Convivial tools are those which are robust and durable, preserve

0:06:57.640 --> 0:07:01.719
<v Speaker 2>or enhance ecosystems, level unequal power relationships, and give each

0:07:01.760 --> 0:07:04.719
<v Speaker 2>person who uses them the greatest opportunity to enrich the

0:07:04.839 --> 0:07:07.800
<v Speaker 2>environment with the fruits of their vision. And a convivial

0:07:07.920 --> 0:07:11.360
<v Speaker 2>society is one in which tools, which, according to ilag

0:07:11.480 --> 0:07:16.800
<v Speaker 2>includes physical hardware, productive institutions, and productive systems. So tools

0:07:16.840 --> 0:07:23.880
<v Speaker 2>will be factories, hospitals, schools, farms, all of those things

0:07:23.880 --> 0:07:26.520
<v Speaker 2>are being included in his definition of tools, and a

0:07:26.560 --> 0:07:29.040
<v Speaker 2>convivial society is one of which those tools operate on

0:07:29.080 --> 0:07:33.120
<v Speaker 2>the humans scale and save the people instead of rulers.

0:07:45.040 --> 0:07:47.720
<v Speaker 2>The idea of convivial tools really challenges us to view

0:07:47.720 --> 0:07:51.120
<v Speaker 2>technologies and means to enhance our lives rather than displace

0:07:51.120 --> 0:07:54.400
<v Speaker 2>our livelihoods. It's a call to harness innovation for the

0:07:54.440 --> 0:07:58.840
<v Speaker 2>bettering of society instead of the perpetuation of radical monopolies,

0:08:00.240 --> 0:08:02.920
<v Speaker 2>which I spoke about in a previous it can happen

0:08:02.960 --> 0:08:07.679
<v Speaker 2>here episode. I think a Lodites like John Booth would

0:08:07.720 --> 0:08:12.800
<v Speaker 2>have certainly appreciated that message, yea, and to the rights

0:08:12.800 --> 0:08:17.360
<v Speaker 2>of today certainly do because yeah, I'm not the first

0:08:17.480 --> 0:08:20.040
<v Speaker 2>nor the only person to see lessons to be learned

0:08:20.280 --> 0:08:24.000
<v Speaker 2>from the la Lite movement. The concept of a Neolodite

0:08:24.040 --> 0:08:26.720
<v Speaker 2>movement has been embraced by a variety of folks who

0:08:27.080 --> 0:08:30.200
<v Speaker 2>may or may not understand what the original Latite movement

0:08:30.240 --> 0:08:33.440
<v Speaker 2>was about. Like, you know, you have these primitivists who

0:08:33.520 --> 0:08:36.080
<v Speaker 2>embrace the Neolotte cause because I think it means hate

0:08:36.120 --> 0:08:39.160
<v Speaker 2>and technology, and you have the anarchists and the trade

0:08:39.240 --> 0:08:42.360
<v Speaker 2>unionists and the environmentalists. We're looking more at the label,

0:08:42.480 --> 0:08:45.920
<v Speaker 2>organized and roots of the original Latite movement, and of

0:08:45.920 --> 0:08:49.920
<v Speaker 2>course even see echoes of you know, Ogloodite action in

0:08:50.080 --> 0:08:52.599
<v Speaker 2>the vandalism against self driving cars.

0:08:53.200 --> 0:08:54.640
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, yeah, yeah.

0:08:55.120 --> 0:09:00.360
<v Speaker 2>The Neolodite movement is composed of activists, workers, scholars, and

0:09:00.400 --> 0:09:04.040
<v Speaker 2>social critics who stand against the predominant worldview that unbridled

0:09:04.080 --> 0:09:08.560
<v Speaker 2>technology represents progress, point ins key, then critiques, and in

0:09:08.559 --> 0:09:12.320
<v Speaker 2>some cases actual action against technologies and tech companies who

0:09:12.360 --> 0:09:17.560
<v Speaker 2>desecrate our planet and our society. Philosopher Lewis Mumford, who

0:09:17.559 --> 0:09:20.840
<v Speaker 2>had written the Myth of the Machine Pentagonic Power, reminds

0:09:20.920 --> 0:09:25.520
<v Speaker 2>us that technology encompasses more than just physical objects. It

0:09:25.559 --> 0:09:29.240
<v Speaker 2>also includes the techniques of operation and the social organizations

0:09:29.440 --> 0:09:31.160
<v Speaker 2>that make up particular technology work.

0:09:31.840 --> 0:09:34.400
<v Speaker 1>Technology reflects our worldview.

0:09:35.320 --> 0:09:38.240
<v Speaker 2>The forms of technology we embrace, whether they be machines, techniques,

0:09:38.280 --> 0:09:42.160
<v Speaker 2>or social structures, are seemply rooted in our perception of life, death,

0:09:42.440 --> 0:09:45.640
<v Speaker 2>human potential, and the relationships between humans and nature.

0:09:46.440 --> 0:09:50.160
<v Speaker 1>Our choice of technology, in many ways, mirrors.

0:09:49.760 --> 0:09:53.439
<v Speaker 2>Our outlook on the world. That outlook in the modern

0:09:53.440 --> 0:09:56.520
<v Speaker 2>world is shaped by a rather mechanistic approach to life,

0:09:56.920 --> 0:10:02.880
<v Speaker 2>characterized by rational thinking, efficiency, delitarianism, scientific detachment, and a

0:10:02.920 --> 0:10:06.920
<v Speaker 2>belief in humanities, ownership and supremacy over nature. That's a yeah,

0:10:06.960 --> 0:10:09.720
<v Speaker 2>we're going to text like the military industrial complex, and

0:10:09.760 --> 0:10:16.040
<v Speaker 2>they weren't sprawl. Honestly, in a sense, the old ltites

0:10:16.559 --> 0:10:20.720
<v Speaker 2>kind of had it easy. Not I mean, obviously their

0:10:20.720 --> 0:10:24.320
<v Speaker 2>conditions were horrible. When I say they had it easy,

0:10:24.360 --> 0:10:26.600
<v Speaker 2>I mean it's in the sense that their machines could

0:10:26.840 --> 0:10:28.480
<v Speaker 2>be destroyed by their sledgehammers.

0:10:29.000 --> 0:10:32.000
<v Speaker 1>Right, yeah, yeah, what technology is a lot more ephemoral.

0:10:32.280 --> 0:10:34.520
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's in the cloud.

0:10:35.840 --> 0:10:38.880
<v Speaker 2>It's as nebulous as microplastics in the soil, the water,

0:10:38.960 --> 0:10:41.480
<v Speaker 2>and the breast milk. I mean, it's everywhere, and it's

0:10:41.520 --> 0:10:43.560
<v Speaker 2>integrated into everything. It's like, where do you even begin?

0:10:44.320 --> 0:10:44.560
<v Speaker 3>Yeah?

0:10:44.600 --> 0:10:44.840
<v Speaker 1>Wow.

0:10:47.000 --> 0:10:51.120
<v Speaker 2>In the book When Technology Wounds by Psychologists Childish Clendening

0:10:51.760 --> 0:10:57.880
<v Speaker 2>by psychologists Chellis Clendening, she studied technology survivors, people who

0:10:57.920 --> 0:11:00.880
<v Speaker 2>had suffered injury or illness in recent years after being

0:11:00.920 --> 0:11:05.000
<v Speaker 2>exposed to various toxic technologies in their homes and workplaces,

0:11:05.400 --> 0:11:11.160
<v Speaker 2>whether nuclear, radiation, pesticides, asbestos, both control devices, or drugs,

0:11:11.640 --> 0:11:13.520
<v Speaker 2>and covered how they had begun to question not only

0:11:13.559 --> 0:11:18.000
<v Speaker 2>the processes that maimed them, but the world that indifferently

0:11:18.120 --> 0:11:22.040
<v Speaker 2>forced those processes on them under the guise of progress.

0:11:24.120 --> 0:11:26.640
<v Speaker 2>Glendoning saw these victims as the basis of a new

0:11:26.679 --> 0:11:30.240
<v Speaker 2>bloodlight movement struggling against what has been called the Second

0:11:30.320 --> 0:11:34.920
<v Speaker 2>Industrial what has been called the Second Industrial Revolution. Alongside

0:11:34.960 --> 0:11:39.360
<v Speaker 2>thinkers like Lewis Mumford and Ivan Ilich, those survivors have

0:11:39.400 --> 0:11:41.839
<v Speaker 2>gone on to create groups such as Asbestos Victims of

0:11:41.880 --> 0:11:46.760
<v Speaker 2>America Aspartame, Victims of their Friends, Citizens Against Pesticide Misuse,

0:11:47.120 --> 0:11:51.400
<v Speaker 2>DALK and Shield Information Network des action In, National National

0:11:51.440 --> 0:11:55.960
<v Speaker 2>Association of Atomic Veterans, National Committee for Victims of Human Research,

0:11:56.320 --> 0:12:00.679
<v Speaker 2>National Toxics Campaign, and the VDT Coalition, of course are

0:12:00.679 --> 0:12:03.640
<v Speaker 2>based in the US, and there are also actives groups

0:12:03.679 --> 0:12:07.200
<v Speaker 2>like earth First that could could have been classified under

0:12:07.240 --> 0:12:11.199
<v Speaker 2>the Neolotte cause and Earthful strategy was to stop environmental

0:12:11.200 --> 0:12:12.280
<v Speaker 2>intrusions by.

0:12:12.080 --> 0:12:14.600
<v Speaker 1>Any means available, legal and otherwise.

0:12:14.960 --> 0:12:18.400
<v Speaker 2>So they would be slashing engines, slashing tires, disabling engines,

0:12:18.720 --> 0:12:22.920
<v Speaker 2>blocking roads. Most famously, they would drilled spikes into trees

0:12:22.960 --> 0:12:26.840
<v Speaker 2>and wilderness forests to prevent them from being logged by chainsaws.

0:12:26.960 --> 0:12:29.920
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:12:30.080 --> 0:12:32.679
<v Speaker 2>But you know, while all these movements and organizations are

0:12:32.679 --> 0:12:34.960
<v Speaker 2>happening in the Western world, it really wasn't just the

0:12:34.960 --> 0:12:38.680
<v Speaker 2>Western world where this is happening. A positive undercurrent of

0:12:38.679 --> 0:12:42.480
<v Speaker 2>the right spirit has surged where indigenous peoples have led

0:12:42.480 --> 0:12:46.080
<v Speaker 2>the charges against the incursions of industrialism. Quncities are mainly

0:12:46.120 --> 0:12:49.640
<v Speaker 2>resisting the machines and projects from dustrialization, but also pushing

0:12:49.679 --> 0:12:53.840
<v Speaker 2>back against its cultural impact. Peasants and farmers staunchally rejecting

0:12:53.920 --> 0:12:57.800
<v Speaker 2>participation in the various development initiatives imposed upon them by

0:12:57.800 --> 0:13:01.440
<v Speaker 2>compliant governments, often in the inence, often under the influence

0:13:01.480 --> 0:13:04.680
<v Speaker 2>of entities like the World Bank or the US State Department.

0:13:05.679 --> 0:13:09.120
<v Speaker 2>For example, during the early nineteen eighties, some farmers in

0:13:09.160 --> 0:13:12.120
<v Speaker 2>Mali took a stand against the construction of dams and

0:13:12.200 --> 0:13:15.079
<v Speaker 2>dykes for a rice growing program that they wanted no

0:13:15.240 --> 0:13:19.000
<v Speaker 2>part of. Other communities elsewhere have rallied to hold dam

0:13:19.120 --> 0:13:22.600
<v Speaker 2>projects that threatened to submerge their ancestral lands, and some

0:13:22.679 --> 0:13:25.800
<v Speaker 2>of them successful, as seen of the villagers who protested

0:13:25.840 --> 0:13:28.840
<v Speaker 2>the Narmada Dam in India in the early nineteen nineties,

0:13:29.320 --> 0:13:32.920
<v Speaker 2>and others have faced more daunting challenges, like the people

0:13:32.960 --> 0:13:36.199
<v Speaker 2>of eastern Java who protested against the Neper Irrigation Dam

0:13:36.520 --> 0:13:40.160
<v Speaker 2>and faced deadly consequences at the hands of Indonesian security

0:13:40.200 --> 0:13:46.680
<v Speaker 2>forces in nineteen ninety three. Intergous tribes have also organized

0:13:46.720 --> 0:13:50.240
<v Speaker 2>to combat deforestation and road building projects that encroached upon

0:13:50.280 --> 0:13:54.040
<v Speaker 2>their territories. The Chipco tree huggan movement in India during

0:13:54.080 --> 0:13:57.600
<v Speaker 2>the nineteen seventies and eighties famously succeeded in stopping government

0:13:57.600 --> 0:14:01.280
<v Speaker 2>clear cutting efforts and similar projects of echoed across the globe,

0:14:01.400 --> 0:14:05.240
<v Speaker 2>from Malaysia to Australia, Brazil to Costa Rica, Solomon Islands,

0:14:05.240 --> 0:14:10.040
<v Speaker 2>Indonesia and beyond. Traditional fishermen in many regions, such as

0:14:10.040 --> 0:14:13.920
<v Speaker 2>the Indians of continent, Malaysia, Indonesia, and multiple ports along

0:14:13.960 --> 0:14:17.040
<v Speaker 2>the Pacific coast of South America including Ecuador and Columbia,

0:14:17.160 --> 0:14:20.120
<v Speaker 2>have also taken action against industrial fish and fleets encroaching

0:14:20.200 --> 0:14:23.840
<v Speaker 2>on their waters and jeopardizing their livelihoods. In some cases,

0:14:23.880 --> 0:14:27.760
<v Speaker 2>these protests may have involved the destruction of machinery, but sabotage,

0:14:27.800 --> 0:14:29.520
<v Speaker 2>you know, is not unheard of, like in the case

0:14:29.560 --> 0:14:32.040
<v Speaker 2>of a high tech chemical plant in Thailand in nineteen

0:14:32.080 --> 0:14:37.200
<v Speaker 2>eighty six. The driving force behind these actions really mirrors

0:14:37.240 --> 0:14:40.040
<v Speaker 2>to ethos you know, as they share this full und

0:14:40.040 --> 0:14:42.600
<v Speaker 2>desire to preserve the traditional ways of life and livelihood

0:14:42.920 --> 0:14:46.080
<v Speaker 2>in the face of industrial capitalisms relentless pull towards a

0:14:46.120 --> 0:14:50.160
<v Speaker 2>wage and market system. And then, of course, outside these

0:14:50.160 --> 0:14:54.400
<v Speaker 2>movers and shakers, these underground activists, there are also you know,

0:14:54.440 --> 0:15:01.160
<v Speaker 2>the philosophical lirites. Like the aforementioned illage. The Neola spectrum

0:15:01.400 --> 0:15:05.840
<v Speaker 2>is more diverse and intriguing than one might imagine. While

0:15:05.880 --> 0:15:09.040
<v Speaker 2>it may not have crystallized into a more formal movement

0:15:09.200 --> 0:15:12.760
<v Speaker 2>with clear representatives, as is expected of movements these days,

0:15:13.360 --> 0:15:16.480
<v Speaker 2>it unites a wide array of individuals to share common

0:15:16.560 --> 0:15:20.880
<v Speaker 2>awakening from the allure of unchecked technology and resist various

0:15:20.920 --> 0:15:26.760
<v Speaker 2>aspects of the industrial monoculture. Perhaps in the connections between

0:15:26.760 --> 0:15:29.920
<v Speaker 2>these separate groups strengthen we'd see a greater recognition of

0:15:29.960 --> 0:15:34.800
<v Speaker 2>the interconnected challenges in this grand tapestry of all evolving world.

0:15:35.240 --> 0:15:37.680
<v Speaker 2>But the thing is to address the challenges posed by

0:15:37.720 --> 0:15:41.320
<v Speaker 2>these technologies. It's not enough to merely regulate or eliminate

0:15:41.320 --> 0:15:45.520
<v Speaker 2>in visual items like pesticides or nuclear weapons. What's required

0:15:45.520 --> 0:15:48.480
<v Speaker 2>as a profound shift in our thinking about humanity and

0:15:48.560 --> 0:15:52.200
<v Speaker 2>in our relationship to life itself. We need to craft

0:15:52.680 --> 0:15:56.040
<v Speaker 2>a new worldview that paves the way for a different

0:15:56.040 --> 0:15:58.960
<v Speaker 2>way of interacting with our world, our technologies, and our

0:15:58.960 --> 0:15:59.920
<v Speaker 2>fellow human beings.

0:16:01.280 --> 0:16:02.800
<v Speaker 1>We need to reconsider a.

0:16:02.840 --> 0:16:04.760
<v Speaker 2>Place in the ground scheme of things and to imagine

0:16:04.760 --> 0:16:08.520
<v Speaker 2>a world where harmony and balance take precedence of a

0:16:08.640 --> 0:16:14.440
<v Speaker 2>domination and control. In Notes toward a Neulart Manifesto written

0:16:14.440 --> 0:16:18.560
<v Speaker 2>in nineteen ninety also by Cheldish, Clendoning, The author outlines

0:16:18.640 --> 0:16:22.400
<v Speaker 2>three core principles and four prescriptions that could drive the

0:16:22.400 --> 0:16:26.240
<v Speaker 2>Neulrite movement. In terms of principles, firstly, and I suppose

0:16:26.280 --> 0:16:31.760
<v Speaker 2>most essentially to addressing the misconception, Neulorites are not anti technology.

0:16:32.840 --> 0:16:36.560
<v Speaker 2>Actually says technology is intrinsic to human creativity and culture.

0:16:37.200 --> 0:16:39.320
<v Speaker 2>But what they oppose are the kinds of technologies that

0:16:39.360 --> 0:16:44.520
<v Speaker 2>are at root destructive of human lives and communities. The

0:16:44.600 --> 0:16:49.800
<v Speaker 2>next principle two is that all technologies are political. Quote

0:16:50.200 --> 0:16:54.440
<v Speaker 2>a social critic Gerrymander rights in four argumented Elimination of Television,

0:16:55.040 --> 0:16:56.960
<v Speaker 2>a book I read some years ago, by the way

0:16:56.960 --> 0:17:01.080
<v Speaker 2>that a Ferminian to revisit. But continuing the quote, technologies

0:17:01.120 --> 0:17:03.440
<v Speaker 2>are not neutral tools that can be used for good

0:17:03.560 --> 0:17:06.600
<v Speaker 2>or evil dependent on who uses them. They are entities

0:17:06.640 --> 0:17:09.880
<v Speaker 2>that have been consciously structured to reflect and serve specific,

0:17:09.920 --> 0:17:14.680
<v Speaker 2>powerful interests in specific historical situations. The technology is created

0:17:14.680 --> 0:17:17.840
<v Speaker 2>by mass technological society. Are those that serve the perpetuation

0:17:18.080 --> 0:17:20.760
<v Speaker 2>of mass technological society. They tend to be structured for

0:17:20.760 --> 0:17:25.840
<v Speaker 2>short term efficiency, ease of production, distribution, marketing and profit potential,

0:17:26.359 --> 0:17:29.080
<v Speaker 2>or for war making. As a result, they tend to

0:17:29.080 --> 0:17:32.280
<v Speaker 2>create rigid social systems and institutions that people do not

0:17:32.440 --> 0:17:38.320
<v Speaker 2>understand and cannot change or control. The last principle three

0:17:38.600 --> 0:17:42.040
<v Speaker 2>is that the personal view of technology is dangerously limited.

0:17:43.080 --> 0:17:46.960
<v Speaker 2>Glendening argues that the oftenhood message, but I couldn't live

0:17:47.000 --> 0:17:49.879
<v Speaker 2>without my mood processor.

0:17:49.880 --> 0:17:52.560
<v Speaker 1>Because of course she's right in this. You know, years

0:17:52.560 --> 0:17:53.080
<v Speaker 1>and yeares ago.

0:17:53.240 --> 0:17:56.440
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, yeah, you have my word automatic typewriter.

0:17:57.400 --> 0:18:00.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, but this oftenhod message that I couldn't live up

0:18:00.880 --> 0:18:02.880
<v Speaker 2>my word process. So, and I guess you could substitute

0:18:02.920 --> 0:18:07.960
<v Speaker 2>that for smartphone, not computer. That message denies the wider

0:18:08.000 --> 0:18:12.119
<v Speaker 2>consequences of widespread use of computers, for example, the toxic

0:18:12.160 --> 0:18:15.600
<v Speaker 2>contamination of workers and electronic plants, or the certifying of

0:18:15.640 --> 0:18:19.000
<v Speaker 2>corporate power through exclusive access to new information and databases.

0:18:20.080 --> 0:18:25.400
<v Speaker 2>As Manda points out, producers and disseminators of technologies tend

0:18:25.440 --> 0:18:30.439
<v Speaker 2>to introduce their creations and upbeat utopian terms. You know,

0:18:30.520 --> 0:18:34.000
<v Speaker 2>pesticides will increase yields to feed a hungry planet. Nuclear

0:18:34.080 --> 0:18:36.600
<v Speaker 2>energy will be too deep, too cheap to meter.

0:18:36.680 --> 0:18:37.200
<v Speaker 1>Et cetera.

0:18:38.000 --> 0:18:39.399
<v Speaker 2>And of course you know you have to throw in

0:18:39.440 --> 0:18:45.280
<v Speaker 2>that potshot had nuclear energy. It's very very twentieth century

0:18:45.280 --> 0:18:51.120
<v Speaker 2>coded text. Yeah, however, quote. Learning to critique technology demands

0:18:51.119 --> 0:18:55.880
<v Speaker 2>fully examining its sociological context, economic gratifications, and political meanings.

0:18:56.359 --> 0:18:58.960
<v Speaker 2>It involves asking not just what is gained for what

0:18:59.080 --> 0:19:01.439
<v Speaker 2>is lost and by who. It also looking at the

0:19:01.480 --> 0:19:04.320
<v Speaker 2>introduction of technologies from the perspective not only a few

0:19:04.359 --> 0:19:07.040
<v Speaker 2>in use, but of their impact on other living beings,

0:19:07.400 --> 0:19:13.320
<v Speaker 2>natural systems, and the environment. And then there's the neololide program,

0:19:13.359 --> 0:19:15.760
<v Speaker 2>which loses me a bit at some points, even where

0:19:15.800 --> 0:19:19.320
<v Speaker 2>I may agree with some of their principles, and you know,

0:19:19.720 --> 0:19:22.240
<v Speaker 2>you might say that's a sign of my propagandized mind

0:19:22.320 --> 0:19:24.480
<v Speaker 2>in our technological society.

0:19:24.640 --> 0:19:27.119
<v Speaker 1>But I'll leave you to be the judge of that.

0:19:27.880 --> 0:19:33.640
<v Speaker 2>Here's what Glendening explicitly proposes one, as I moved toward

0:19:33.720 --> 0:19:36.480
<v Speaker 2>dealing with the consequences of modern technologies and preventing further

0:19:36.560 --> 0:19:39.240
<v Speaker 2>destruction of life, the new Lolite movement should favor the

0:19:39.240 --> 0:19:46.000
<v Speaker 2>dismantling of nuclear technologies, chemical technologies, genetic engineering technologies, television,

0:19:46.480 --> 0:19:52.640
<v Speaker 2>electromagnetic technologies, and computer technologies, which, according to them, you know,

0:19:52.960 --> 0:19:56.440
<v Speaker 2>according to her Coales, disease and death create dangerous me

0:19:56.520 --> 0:19:59.919
<v Speaker 2>to gens. In case of television functions, as a centralized

0:20:00.040 --> 0:20:04.600
<v Speaker 2>I'm controlling force, poisons.

0:20:04.240 --> 0:20:05.760
<v Speaker 1>The environment, all these different things.

0:20:05.760 --> 0:20:07.440
<v Speaker 2>And I mean I gets some of the justifications for

0:20:07.480 --> 0:20:10.720
<v Speaker 2>some of these technologies, right, Yeah, of course, disease, death,

0:20:11.200 --> 0:20:16.320
<v Speaker 2>you know, pollution, social issue is right, yeah, But I

0:20:16.800 --> 0:20:18.320
<v Speaker 2>at same time, I don't believe in through and I

0:20:18.440 --> 0:20:20.119
<v Speaker 2>was entire sciences and technologies.

0:20:20.119 --> 0:20:21.600
<v Speaker 1>Who will see like that?

0:20:21.640 --> 0:20:24.560
<v Speaker 2>You know, it feels like it feels like a very

0:20:24.760 --> 0:20:27.520
<v Speaker 2>myopic view being presented on some of these texts.

0:20:27.840 --> 0:20:31.159
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean, I guess this was before really the

0:20:31.240 --> 0:20:35.119
<v Speaker 3>decentralization of some of the means of dissemination of information

0:20:35.240 --> 0:20:38.480
<v Speaker 3>that happened kind of later on with things like some

0:20:38.520 --> 0:20:40.080
<v Speaker 3>parts of the Internet. I don't want to say by

0:20:40.080 --> 0:20:43.840
<v Speaker 3>any means of the Internet is decentralized, but at least

0:20:43.880 --> 0:20:47.159
<v Speaker 3>the promise of that which we occasionally see deliver as well, right,

0:20:47.320 --> 0:20:50.520
<v Speaker 3>Like if you saw today that I was just watching

0:20:50.560 --> 0:20:53.879
<v Speaker 3>a video of the Yeppe Gay in Syria that the

0:20:54.000 --> 0:20:58.760
<v Speaker 3>people in Rajaba like talking about the importance of women

0:20:58.760 --> 0:21:02.160
<v Speaker 3>in the revolution in me and and like just occasionally

0:21:03.000 --> 0:21:05.280
<v Speaker 3>the internet or technology gives us the thing they were

0:21:05.280 --> 0:21:10.080
<v Speaker 3>supposed to give us, a disability to connect without barriers. Absolutely,

0:21:11.320 --> 0:21:14.159
<v Speaker 3>but yeah, like you said that that's the computer or

0:21:14.200 --> 0:21:16.000
<v Speaker 3>the cell phone and that was recorded on or whatever

0:21:16.080 --> 0:21:20.360
<v Speaker 3>happened because somebody somebody in the congo and in horrific

0:21:20.440 --> 0:21:24.120
<v Speaker 3>conditions and the DC had to dig out some rare

0:21:24.119 --> 0:21:26.560
<v Speaker 3>earth chemical and then got paid next to nothing and

0:21:27.520 --> 0:21:31.480
<v Speaker 3>their ancestral homeland was ruined by some rabid company that

0:21:31.720 --> 0:21:33.720
<v Speaker 3>makes billions of dollars and pays people like shit.

0:21:34.920 --> 0:21:35.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:21:35.800 --> 0:21:38.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, So, I mean, I absolutely agree that the supply

0:21:39.080 --> 0:21:43.520
<v Speaker 2>side of a lot of these technologies need to change drastically. Yeah,

0:21:43.560 --> 0:21:45.760
<v Speaker 2>and also the you know, just the supply gene as

0:21:45.800 --> 0:21:48.879
<v Speaker 2>a whole, you know, from the raw materials to the

0:21:48.920 --> 0:21:52.640
<v Speaker 2>finished product and how it gets to us. I mean,

0:21:52.680 --> 0:21:55.480
<v Speaker 2>that might mean no more of certain technologies, or it

0:21:55.520 --> 0:21:58.320
<v Speaker 2>might mean a different approach, but it really remains to

0:21:58.320 --> 0:22:02.679
<v Speaker 2>be seen. We really haven't tried other approaches because you know,

0:22:02.720 --> 0:22:15.840
<v Speaker 2>we live under this capitalist hegemony. The next step in

0:22:15.880 --> 0:22:20.000
<v Speaker 2>the program to the New Rite movement should favor a

0:22:20.040 --> 0:22:23.280
<v Speaker 2>search for new technological forms and the creation of technologies

0:22:23.320 --> 0:22:27.200
<v Speaker 2>by the people directly involved in their use, not by scientists,

0:22:27.280 --> 0:22:31.200
<v Speaker 2>engineers and entrepreneurs who gain financially from mass production and

0:22:31.240 --> 0:22:33.800
<v Speaker 2>distribution of the inventions. I don't know little about the

0:22:33.800 --> 0:22:37.680
<v Speaker 2>context in which their technologies are used. I don't necessarily

0:22:37.680 --> 0:22:40.199
<v Speaker 2>believe in, you know, splitting it down the middle like that,

0:22:40.440 --> 0:22:43.439
<v Speaker 2>as if you know, scientists and engineers are not going

0:22:43.480 --> 0:22:45.000
<v Speaker 2>to be the people that are directly involved in their use.

0:22:45.040 --> 0:22:47.639
<v Speaker 1>And in some cases that's true.

0:22:47.800 --> 0:22:50.800
<v Speaker 2>But another case is, you know, you know, people who

0:22:50.840 --> 0:22:52.919
<v Speaker 2>are using the pros sometimes the people who invented it.

0:22:53.280 --> 0:22:54.879
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, iterated on that to whatnot?

0:22:55.200 --> 0:22:58.480
<v Speaker 3>Like when I think about before there were three D

0:22:58.520 --> 0:23:01.119
<v Speaker 3>printing weapons in a revution in the amber, they were

0:23:01.160 --> 0:23:04.000
<v Speaker 3>three D printing press theses because land minds are so

0:23:04.080 --> 0:23:07.800
<v Speaker 3>common there, right, and so like for those people where

0:23:07.800 --> 0:23:10.439
<v Speaker 3>the engineer is a person whose brother or sister or

0:23:10.600 --> 0:23:13.440
<v Speaker 3>non binary sibling or what have you needs a leg,

0:23:13.960 --> 0:23:16.639
<v Speaker 3>and so they have iterated or designed a leg, and

0:23:16.760 --> 0:23:20.320
<v Speaker 3>like that person is very much both like benefiting from

0:23:20.320 --> 0:23:23.400
<v Speaker 3>the end use and doing the engineering exactly.

0:23:23.600 --> 0:23:25.760
<v Speaker 2>I get this is kind of like, you know, a

0:23:25.840 --> 0:23:28.080
<v Speaker 2>screed against the Ivory tower types.

0:23:28.200 --> 0:23:31.200
<v Speaker 1>But yes, I don't think that reflects on you know,

0:23:31.480 --> 0:23:32.080
<v Speaker 1>all of.

0:23:31.960 --> 0:23:36.639
<v Speaker 2>The or even most of the scientists and engineers. A

0:23:36.680 --> 0:23:40.479
<v Speaker 2>lot of engineers on the ground, a lot of you know,

0:23:40.680 --> 0:23:44.000
<v Speaker 2>barefoot scientists as the expression is.

0:23:44.400 --> 0:23:47.399
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, yeah, Nick, when we talk about things like permaculture

0:23:47.600 --> 0:23:50.119
<v Speaker 3>or the things we talked about before, like, some of

0:23:50.119 --> 0:23:52.560
<v Speaker 3>that is a science too, right. We have a thesis

0:23:52.560 --> 0:23:54.679
<v Speaker 3>and we test it and we prove it, and we

0:23:54.800 --> 0:23:58.199
<v Speaker 3>keep iterating on it like it's a hypothesis, I should say, Like,

0:23:59.119 --> 0:24:01.399
<v Speaker 3>and that's certainly a sign which is rooted in a

0:24:01.440 --> 0:24:03.520
<v Speaker 3>place and people and respect for the environment.

0:24:04.400 --> 0:24:08.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean the manifesto goes a little bit further

0:24:08.960 --> 0:24:12.159
<v Speaker 2>on this particular point. You know, she's advocating for the

0:24:12.200 --> 0:24:14.600
<v Speaker 2>creation of technologies that are of a scale and structure

0:24:14.640 --> 0:24:16.880
<v Speaker 2>that makes them understandable to the people who use them

0:24:16.920 --> 0:24:19.720
<v Speaker 2>and are affected by them. She's advocating for the creation

0:24:19.760 --> 0:24:22.160
<v Speaker 2>of technology is built with a high degree of flexibility,

0:24:22.520 --> 0:24:24.159
<v Speaker 2>so that you do want to impose a rigid and

0:24:24.240 --> 0:24:27.320
<v Speaker 2>iror woosibile imprint on their users. And she's advocating for

0:24:27.359 --> 0:24:30.479
<v Speaker 2>the creation of technologies are foster independence from technological addiction

0:24:30.880 --> 0:24:35.080
<v Speaker 2>and promise political freedom, economic justice, and ecological balance.

0:24:36.960 --> 0:24:38.880
<v Speaker 1>They are I can't disagree, you know.

0:24:39.240 --> 0:24:40.960
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I know, I'm down with that.

0:24:41.680 --> 0:24:44.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm absolutely down with advocating for that.

0:24:44.400 --> 0:24:46.280
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:24:46.320 --> 0:24:50.479
<v Speaker 2>The third point in the program, she says, we favor

0:24:50.520 --> 0:24:55.320
<v Speaker 2>the creation of technologies in which politics, morality, ecology, and

0:24:55.440 --> 0:24:58.480
<v Speaker 2>technics are merged for the benefits of life on Earth.

0:24:59.240 --> 0:25:03.040
<v Speaker 2>For example, community based energy sources utilizing solar, wind and

0:25:03.080 --> 0:25:10.000
<v Speaker 2>water technologies, organic biological technologies and agriculture, engineering, architecture, art, medicine, transportation,

0:25:10.160 --> 0:25:15.159
<v Speaker 2>and defense, conflict resolution technologies which emphasize cooperation, understanding, and

0:25:15.240 --> 0:25:20.879
<v Speaker 2>continuity of relationship, and decentralized social technologies which encourage participation, responsibility,

0:25:21.160 --> 0:25:26.600
<v Speaker 2>and empowerment. Now you know, I'm the solar punk guy.

0:25:27.080 --> 0:25:30.840
<v Speaker 2>I'm the you know, the anarchists on you tube whatever.

0:25:31.400 --> 0:25:32.359
<v Speaker 1>You got me on these.

0:25:33.200 --> 0:25:36.439
<v Speaker 2>You know, I agree with all of these obviously, But

0:25:36.760 --> 0:25:40.159
<v Speaker 2>what I find interesting is that this list seems to

0:25:40.240 --> 0:25:44.560
<v Speaker 2>ignore how, you know, the technology is being advocated here

0:25:45.400 --> 0:25:46.320
<v Speaker 2>are linked to.

0:25:46.240 --> 0:25:49.720
<v Speaker 1>The previous technologies that would just be in decride.

0:25:49.800 --> 0:25:52.720
<v Speaker 2>You know, like in one section she's talking about, you know,

0:25:52.800 --> 0:25:56.720
<v Speaker 2>a fan of these chemical technologies, but chemistry is an

0:25:56.760 --> 0:26:02.359
<v Speaker 2>inevitable component of the biological technology advocating for are You're

0:26:02.359 --> 0:26:06.679
<v Speaker 2>saying that you don't like computer technologies, but when you're

0:26:06.720 --> 0:26:09.600
<v Speaker 2>talking about like solar wind and water energy, which to.

0:26:09.560 --> 0:26:13.840
<v Speaker 1>Be fair, can be low tech too. Yeah, there is usually.

0:26:13.480 --> 0:26:20.439
<v Speaker 2>Some involvement of a computer in those energy systems. So

0:26:20.520 --> 0:26:27.280
<v Speaker 2>I think there's sights inconsistency there, But I don't know,

0:26:27.320 --> 0:26:27.879
<v Speaker 2>what do you think?

0:26:28.240 --> 0:26:33.160
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I think yeah, like we can't sort of yeah, yeah,

0:26:33.560 --> 0:26:36.040
<v Speaker 3>sometimes we can't say that to like you say, to

0:26:36.080 --> 0:26:38.919
<v Speaker 3>a degree, all of these systems will require a technology,

0:26:39.200 --> 0:26:42.080
<v Speaker 3>and like, I suppose we start to get into like

0:26:42.080 --> 0:26:44.560
<v Speaker 3>what is the technology right before we get too far,

0:26:45.160 --> 0:26:48.720
<v Speaker 3>and then I think that's probably a question worth asking.

0:26:49.040 --> 0:26:52.080
<v Speaker 3>But yeah, I think it's easy to throw the maybe

0:26:52.080 --> 0:26:53.240
<v Speaker 3>out of bar water. I suppose.

0:26:54.280 --> 0:26:54.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:26:54.720 --> 0:26:59.640
<v Speaker 2>I mean, like like Momford it said, technology is more

0:26:59.640 --> 0:27:04.520
<v Speaker 2>than just psical objects, it's also techniques of operation organizations.

0:27:05.800 --> 0:27:06.920
<v Speaker 1>That reflects a wild view.

0:27:08.119 --> 0:27:11.720
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. Yeah, so I suppose, as you said before, right, Like,

0:27:12.680 --> 0:27:15.359
<v Speaker 3>it's what I think about often. It's like what we

0:27:15.400 --> 0:27:17.080
<v Speaker 3>need to change is the way we see the world,

0:27:17.920 --> 0:27:20.840
<v Speaker 3>and then the other stuff, well we can change.

0:27:20.880 --> 0:27:22.280
<v Speaker 1>In a MIDI will fall into place.

0:27:22.680 --> 0:27:26.800
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I think again, I'm gonna get back. So I

0:27:26.800 --> 0:27:29.119
<v Speaker 3>was just in ros Java for the last few weeks.

0:27:29.160 --> 0:27:33.320
<v Speaker 3>But one of the things that I heard from everyone there,

0:27:33.400 --> 0:27:35.320
<v Speaker 3>right from like and not just from like people in

0:27:35.320 --> 0:27:38.879
<v Speaker 3>the women's movement, but also from like random guy in

0:27:38.920 --> 0:27:43.119
<v Speaker 3>the market who I'm having tea with is like that

0:27:43.240 --> 0:27:46.680
<v Speaker 3>this idea that we can't can't decolonize the country until

0:27:46.680 --> 0:27:49.119
<v Speaker 3>we declonize our family, and the notion that like women

0:27:49.160 --> 0:27:53.639
<v Speaker 3>were the first colonized group of people, which and so

0:27:53.840 --> 0:27:55.879
<v Speaker 3>like if we can't do gender equality, what you know,

0:27:56.160 --> 0:27:58.040
<v Speaker 3>what are we doing? What we can't Why why we

0:27:58.080 --> 0:28:00.800
<v Speaker 3>find this revolution to liberate our entry when we can't

0:28:00.800 --> 0:28:07.080
<v Speaker 3>liberate our spouse, daughter or what have you. So definitely, yeah,

0:28:07.119 --> 0:28:09.280
<v Speaker 3>it's just it's a very powerful I know it's not

0:28:09.400 --> 0:28:13.400
<v Speaker 3>like as fun as taking a sledgehammer to a cotton mill,

0:28:13.720 --> 0:28:20.040
<v Speaker 3>but like if we if we replicate that kind of

0:28:20.119 --> 0:28:24.960
<v Speaker 3>extractive extractive capitalism is what makes the supply side of

0:28:24.960 --> 0:28:27.399
<v Speaker 3>these things so bad, and it's what also leads us

0:28:27.440 --> 0:28:28.919
<v Speaker 3>to think about using them in a way that can

0:28:28.960 --> 0:28:33.960
<v Speaker 3>extract the most value from the worker. And so I

0:28:34.000 --> 0:28:38.240
<v Speaker 3>would absolutely say that, you know, the break the frame

0:28:38.280 --> 0:28:38.840
<v Speaker 3>in your mind.

0:28:38.920 --> 0:28:42.440
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, that's a good point.

0:28:43.200 --> 0:28:46.120
<v Speaker 2>And it's funny, as you mentioned, you know, as as

0:28:46.200 --> 0:28:49.560
<v Speaker 2>fun as you know, smashing a cotton a cotton mill

0:28:49.640 --> 0:28:50.040
<v Speaker 2>or whatever.

0:28:50.800 --> 0:28:52.880
<v Speaker 1>It made me think that you know, perhaps.

0:28:52.520 --> 0:28:56.680
<v Speaker 2>In a revolutionary society, I guess society.

0:28:56.720 --> 0:28:57.520
<v Speaker 1>You may see.

0:28:58.920 --> 0:29:02.480
<v Speaker 2>Therapeutic rooms where people can smash out some of their

0:29:02.560 --> 0:29:06.920
<v Speaker 2>last frustrations against the capitalist system.

0:29:06.080 --> 0:29:09.000
<v Speaker 1>Yea, consequences they have left for them to fix.

0:29:09.880 --> 0:29:12.560
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, yeah, to get that out before you you take

0:29:12.600 --> 0:29:13.040
<v Speaker 3>that out on.

0:29:13.000 --> 0:29:15.200
<v Speaker 1>Other go and rewild or something. You know, you have

0:29:15.240 --> 0:29:16.640
<v Speaker 1>to get that energy out.

0:29:17.080 --> 0:29:19.720
<v Speaker 3>Yeah yeah, yeah, yea, yeah, remove the toxicity. I like

0:29:19.760 --> 0:29:23.720
<v Speaker 3>that place where you can take that anger out.

0:29:24.880 --> 0:29:25.040
<v Speaker 1>Right.

0:29:25.120 --> 0:29:31.000
<v Speaker 2>So finally, the fourth and final element in the program,

0:29:31.560 --> 0:29:33.920
<v Speaker 2>she says that we favor the development of a life

0:29:34.000 --> 0:29:38.600
<v Speaker 2>enhancing worldview in Western technological societies. We opened in still

0:29:38.600 --> 0:29:41.080
<v Speaker 2>a perception of life, death and human potential, and technological

0:29:41.120 --> 0:29:44.080
<v Speaker 2>societies that will integrate the human need for creative expression,

0:29:44.360 --> 0:29:47.560
<v Speaker 2>spiritual experience in community with the capacity for rational thought

0:29:47.560 --> 0:29:50.240
<v Speaker 2>and functionality. We perceive the human role not as the

0:29:50.280 --> 0:29:53.520
<v Speaker 2>dominator of other species in planetary biology, but as integrated

0:29:53.520 --> 0:29:56.280
<v Speaker 2>into the natural world with appreciation for the sacredness of

0:29:56.320 --> 0:29:59.480
<v Speaker 2>all life. We foresee a sustainable future for humanity if

0:29:59.520 --> 0:30:03.560
<v Speaker 2>and when Western technological societies restructure their mechanistic projections and

0:30:03.680 --> 0:30:07.040
<v Speaker 2>foster the creation of machines, techniques, and social organizations to

0:30:07.120 --> 0:30:12.000
<v Speaker 2>respect both human dignity and the nature's wholeness and progressing towards.

0:30:11.720 --> 0:30:12.800
<v Speaker 1>Such a transition.

0:30:13.360 --> 0:30:15.720
<v Speaker 2>We are aware that we have nothing to lose except

0:30:15.720 --> 0:30:17.840
<v Speaker 2>a way of living that leads the destruction.

0:30:17.600 --> 0:30:21.840
<v Speaker 1>Of all life. We have a world to gain. And

0:30:22.440 --> 0:30:27.000
<v Speaker 1>coote word that was that.

0:30:27.120 --> 0:30:30.520
<v Speaker 3>Was a nice nice, a nice very rhetorical flair at

0:30:30.560 --> 0:30:30.880
<v Speaker 3>the end.

0:30:31.640 --> 0:30:32.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's.

0:30:36.160 --> 0:30:39.920
<v Speaker 2>I mean, in my opinion, coming to a close here,

0:30:40.760 --> 0:30:41.680
<v Speaker 2>the neololites a.

0:30:43.240 --> 0:30:46.600
<v Speaker 1>Hits and a miss. They hit a lot more than

0:30:46.600 --> 0:30:48.960
<v Speaker 1>they miss. There's things I have some slight.

0:30:48.840 --> 0:30:51.920
<v Speaker 2>Quibbles with, and I really, of course I have to

0:30:51.960 --> 0:30:55.120
<v Speaker 2>give them credit for doing a lot more to investigate

0:30:55.200 --> 0:30:59.000
<v Speaker 2>and confront technology than the vast majority of people. I mean,

0:30:59.040 --> 0:31:03.280
<v Speaker 2>they're asking the right questions, questions that you don't see

0:31:03.280 --> 0:31:05.320
<v Speaker 2>being asked at all, you know. See, you get these

0:31:05.320 --> 0:31:09.360
<v Speaker 2>announcements for new technologies, new innovations, new techniques.

0:31:08.920 --> 0:31:09.600
<v Speaker 1>New whatever.

0:31:10.280 --> 0:31:12.800
<v Speaker 2>It's always just like you know, marketing and advertising, and

0:31:12.840 --> 0:31:17.600
<v Speaker 2>then it's just implemented. There's no say of people, there's

0:31:17.600 --> 0:31:20.760
<v Speaker 2>no ad raising questions about what are the consequences of this?

0:31:20.880 --> 0:31:22.760
<v Speaker 2>Be ten years on the line, twenty years on the line,

0:31:22.760 --> 0:31:24.560
<v Speaker 2>fifty years on the line, one hundred years on the line.

0:31:24.600 --> 0:31:25.600
<v Speaker 3>You know, yeah.

0:31:26.240 --> 0:31:29.400
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and the lessons of letters are very clear. Technology

0:31:29.480 --> 0:31:31.800
<v Speaker 2>should serve humanity, not the other way around.

0:31:33.800 --> 0:31:33.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:31:34.000 --> 0:31:37.120
<v Speaker 3>I think that's that's a key take home, Like, Yeah,

0:31:37.240 --> 0:31:39.760
<v Speaker 3>it's there to make our lives better. We don't have

0:31:39.840 --> 0:31:42.600
<v Speaker 3>to not to allow us lands more exploited.

0:31:43.640 --> 0:31:48.720
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, landscape is vast and it's constantly evolving. But the

0:31:48.760 --> 0:31:52.160
<v Speaker 2>principles of the lights and the vision of convivial tools,

0:31:52.600 --> 0:31:56.280
<v Speaker 2>I think they can offer us some guidance. And I

0:31:56.320 --> 0:31:59.400
<v Speaker 2>hope you're way able to take that away from this

0:31:59.560 --> 0:32:02.600
<v Speaker 2>two part too. Yeah, and that's all I have for today.

0:32:03.000 --> 0:32:03.240
<v Speaker 3>Great.

0:32:03.280 --> 0:32:06.880
<v Speaker 2>Thanks you follow me on YouTube, aurism support and patroon

0:32:07.240 --> 0:32:11.440
<v Speaker 2>Slash sent Drew. Thanks James for being part of this.

0:32:11.880 --> 0:32:13.440
<v Speaker 3>I thank you. That was good. I enjoyed it.

0:32:13.960 --> 0:32:21.120
<v Speaker 1>This has been It could happen here, Peace. It could

0:32:21.160 --> 0:32:23.520
<v Speaker 1>happen here as a production of cool Zone Media. For

0:32:23.600 --> 0:32:26.320
<v Speaker 1>more podcasts from cool Zone Media, visit our website cool

0:32:26.400 --> 0:32:29.240
<v Speaker 1>zonemedia dot com, or check us out on the iHeartRadio app,

0:32:29.280 --> 0:32:31.040
<v Speaker 1>Apple Podcasts, or wherever.

0:32:30.720 --> 0:32:31.800
<v Speaker 3>You listen to podcasts.

0:32:32.400 --> 0:32:34.520
<v Speaker 1>You can find sources for It could Happen Here, updated

0:32:34.600 --> 0:32:37.680
<v Speaker 1>monthly at cool zonemedia dot com slash sources.

0:32:37.800 --> 0:32:38.640
<v Speaker 3>Thanks for listening,