1 00:00:01,760 --> 00:00:10,160 Speaker 1: Al Zone Media. Welcome back to happen Here. 2 00:00:10,680 --> 00:00:12,840 Speaker 2: I'm Andrew Sage and you can find my stuff on 3 00:00:12,880 --> 00:00:14,520 Speaker 2: my YouTube channel, Andrewism. 4 00:00:15,200 --> 00:00:17,279 Speaker 1: I'm joined once again by. 5 00:00:18,040 --> 00:00:22,560 Speaker 3: James getting no less a quid as we go, Behi, Andrew. 6 00:00:22,640 --> 00:00:25,360 Speaker 3: I'm excited to learn about what we're going to learn 7 00:00:25,360 --> 00:00:25,880 Speaker 3: about today. 8 00:00:26,600 --> 00:00:29,680 Speaker 2: Yes, we're picking up where we left off by tackling 9 00:00:30,320 --> 00:00:34,239 Speaker 2: the Luddites of today. In our previous episode, we unravel 10 00:00:34,280 --> 00:00:37,400 Speaker 2: the story of Luodites who sit against the encroaching forces 11 00:00:37,600 --> 00:00:41,320 Speaker 2: of the industrial revolution and more specifically the abuses of 12 00:00:41,400 --> 00:00:44,920 Speaker 2: workers by profit seeking capitalists. They were challenging the world 13 00:00:45,000 --> 00:00:48,120 Speaker 2: view of lazy fair capitalism with this increase in amalgamation 14 00:00:48,280 --> 00:00:54,000 Speaker 2: of power, resources, and wealth, rationalized by its emphasis on progress. Today, 15 00:00:54,040 --> 00:00:56,160 Speaker 2: it seems this history as we've repeating itself as we 16 00:00:56,200 --> 00:00:59,720 Speaker 2: face a similar struggle against technological changes that come. 17 00:00:59,640 --> 00:01:01,520 Speaker 1: About to the detriment of workers. 18 00:01:01,840 --> 00:01:04,080 Speaker 2: As some tech has been used by tech companies in 19 00:01:04,160 --> 00:01:08,200 Speaker 2: various industries to drive down wages and worsen conditions for 20 00:01:08,480 --> 00:01:14,080 Speaker 2: common workers, say, for example, technological unemployment. For the rights 21 00:01:14,080 --> 00:01:17,240 Speaker 2: who once resist the encroachment machines would find their concerns 22 00:01:17,240 --> 00:01:20,360 Speaker 2: reflected in a modern world as a technological advanced ones 23 00:01:20,400 --> 00:01:22,920 Speaker 2: often come with the cost of those whose jobs can 24 00:01:22,959 --> 00:01:28,680 Speaker 2: be automated away. For instance, in the manufacturing industry, robots 25 00:01:28,680 --> 00:01:32,480 Speaker 2: and automated assembly lines of streamline production lead into increased 26 00:01:32,480 --> 00:01:36,520 Speaker 2: efficiency and lower costs for companies, but these efficiencies often 27 00:01:36,560 --> 00:01:40,560 Speaker 2: meant the displacement of human workers, and such as in manufacturing, 28 00:01:41,120 --> 00:01:46,040 Speaker 2: the ripple effects extend to various sectors like customer service, transportation, 29 00:01:46,560 --> 00:01:50,600 Speaker 2: and data analysis, and so there's this fere of job 30 00:01:50,720 --> 00:01:57,880 Speaker 2: displacement looms large. However, technological unemployment, which is the belief 31 00:01:57,920 --> 00:02:02,040 Speaker 2: that as technology advances, human jobs are at risk, potentially 32 00:02:02,120 --> 00:02:07,840 Speaker 2: dating to widespread unemployment, has been described by some economists 33 00:02:07,920 --> 00:02:11,519 Speaker 2: as a fallacy. Back in the early days of the 34 00:02:11,520 --> 00:02:14,959 Speaker 2: Industrial Revolution, when the advance of mechanization began transform in 35 00:02:15,040 --> 00:02:18,440 Speaker 2: various industries and with workers fear and automation would render 36 00:02:18,520 --> 00:02:22,160 Speaker 2: them job less and devalue their labor, the people took 37 00:02:22,160 --> 00:02:26,280 Speaker 2: a stand, but as time passed, new industries and job 38 00:02:26,320 --> 00:02:30,360 Speaker 2: opportunities emerged to replace some of the old ones, ultimately 39 00:02:30,480 --> 00:02:34,920 Speaker 2: absorbing that workforce. Fast forward to the twentieth century and 40 00:02:35,000 --> 00:02:38,760 Speaker 2: the rise of computers and automation technology reignited concerns about 41 00:02:38,800 --> 00:02:43,040 Speaker 2: technological unemployment, but again, new jobs were created in new industries. 42 00:02:43,919 --> 00:02:44,200 Speaker 1: Today. 43 00:02:44,200 --> 00:02:48,040 Speaker 2: The debate continues as artificial intelligence, robotics, and automation advance 44 00:02:48,080 --> 00:02:51,840 Speaker 2: at an unprecedented pace, and it remains to be seen 45 00:02:51,880 --> 00:02:54,640 Speaker 2: what the long term consequences of those technologies may be. 46 00:02:56,040 --> 00:02:58,240 Speaker 2: My position has really always been that we should be 47 00:02:58,240 --> 00:03:02,040 Speaker 2: working less anyway, but instead people are obsessed with creating 48 00:03:02,080 --> 00:03:05,280 Speaker 2: new jobs, even when they're unnecessary. See you know, of 49 00:03:05,320 --> 00:03:09,359 Speaker 2: course David Graeber is supposed jobs. But you know, even 50 00:03:09,400 --> 00:03:12,200 Speaker 2: if the idea of mass unemployment due to tech is 51 00:03:12,240 --> 00:03:15,680 Speaker 2: not true, if we end up replacing the jobs that 52 00:03:15,720 --> 00:03:17,880 Speaker 2: are e raised with new jobs. Whatever the case may be, 53 00:03:19,000 --> 00:03:24,559 Speaker 2: tech is nevertheless quite capable of destroying livelihoods, creating unintended consequences, 54 00:03:25,080 --> 00:03:28,240 Speaker 2: and further concentrating power in the hands of fewer and 55 00:03:28,320 --> 00:03:31,720 Speaker 2: fewer people. For every tech advance, whether that makes a 56 00:03:31,800 --> 00:03:35,560 Speaker 2: job more fulfilling and enjoyable, there are also those who 57 00:03:35,600 --> 00:03:38,480 Speaker 2: make it more tea us and grinding. I mean, yes, 58 00:03:38,560 --> 00:03:41,920 Speaker 2: tech can free us from some tasks. You know, accountants 59 00:03:41,960 --> 00:03:44,840 Speaker 2: have digital spreadsheets to make their lives much easier. For example, 60 00:03:45,400 --> 00:03:48,760 Speaker 2: writing is way easier now that the personal computers is 61 00:03:48,800 --> 00:03:54,560 Speaker 2: more common. But while technological progress can produce prosperity, there's 62 00:03:54,640 --> 00:03:57,440 Speaker 2: really no guarantee that the prosperity. 63 00:03:56,920 --> 00:03:58,320 Speaker 1: Will reach the workers. 64 00:03:59,120 --> 00:04:01,960 Speaker 2: In most cases, on the cut, it very clearly doesn't. 65 00:04:03,320 --> 00:04:06,240 Speaker 2: In fact, many of the benefits of the industrial revolution 66 00:04:07,040 --> 00:04:10,800 Speaker 2: were really not felt by the workers until decades later, 67 00:04:11,600 --> 00:04:14,080 Speaker 2: after many of them have been you know, crushed or 68 00:04:14,120 --> 00:04:17,560 Speaker 2: poisoned or killed or you know, died in a factory 69 00:04:17,560 --> 00:04:21,120 Speaker 2: fire or whatever they shut down when protesting, you know, 70 00:04:21,200 --> 00:04:23,279 Speaker 2: like that, they didn't see the benefits until much later on. 71 00:04:23,800 --> 00:04:26,640 Speaker 2: You know, it's not like, you know, these things introduced 72 00:04:26,680 --> 00:04:31,880 Speaker 2: and boom, everybody benefits. I mean even now, not everybody 73 00:04:31,880 --> 00:04:36,440 Speaker 2: in the world is benefiting from you know, the computer age. 74 00:04:36,560 --> 00:04:40,719 Speaker 2: There are still many people, like for example, in the Congo, 75 00:04:40,800 --> 00:04:46,920 Speaker 2: who are endurance, slavery and staves like conditions in order 76 00:04:47,000 --> 00:04:50,159 Speaker 2: to you know, procure the materials necessary for the computer 77 00:04:50,240 --> 00:04:54,320 Speaker 2: age totally, and yet they're not seeing those benefits and 78 00:04:54,440 --> 00:04:57,680 Speaker 2: arranged we're seeing when they'll see the benefits that many 79 00:04:57,720 --> 00:05:00,440 Speaker 2: of us enjoy in various parts of the world, and 80 00:05:00,680 --> 00:05:05,479 Speaker 2: particularly that there was enjoy in the global North in 81 00:05:05,560 --> 00:05:10,359 Speaker 2: our relentless pursuit of progress and technological advancement as defined 82 00:05:10,680 --> 00:05:15,240 Speaker 2: by capitalism, we also end up losing our nature, our community, 83 00:05:15,760 --> 00:05:20,119 Speaker 2: and in many cases are craftsmanship. I mean remember John Booth, 84 00:05:20,760 --> 00:05:22,800 Speaker 2: the one who had said can you keep a secret? 85 00:05:22,960 --> 00:05:25,920 Speaker 1: Or so can I? He has other words? 86 00:05:26,000 --> 00:05:27,960 Speaker 2: You know that the new machinery might be man's chief 87 00:05:28,000 --> 00:05:31,960 Speaker 2: blessing himself his curse if society were differently constituted. 88 00:05:32,680 --> 00:05:33,400 Speaker 1: That's where I have to. 89 00:05:33,320 --> 00:05:37,440 Speaker 2: Bring in the one and only the ls I've spoken 90 00:05:37,480 --> 00:05:41,000 Speaker 2: about him before, of course, the Austrian philosopher, the theologia 91 00:05:41,040 --> 00:05:42,679 Speaker 2: and the sort of everything. 92 00:05:42,720 --> 00:05:47,599 Speaker 1: Guy Ivan Ilich. Oh, yeah, fun times, fun times. Yeah. 93 00:05:47,600 --> 00:05:50,320 Speaker 2: He was a thinker ahead of his time. You know, 94 00:05:50,320 --> 00:05:52,839 Speaker 2: it's really strange in some of his positions, I think, 95 00:05:54,440 --> 00:05:59,080 Speaker 2: but a lot of his concepts resonate today in various movements. 96 00:06:00,160 --> 00:06:04,200 Speaker 2: One of the foundational concepts in the modern movement of 97 00:06:04,279 --> 00:06:09,520 Speaker 2: the growth is the concept of conviviality, which was redefined 98 00:06:09,640 --> 00:06:16,120 Speaker 2: and introduced in the context of our Tools in Ilish's 99 00:06:16,160 --> 00:06:21,320 Speaker 2: book Tools of Conviviality. Eligio's vision, as explored by the book, 100 00:06:21,520 --> 00:06:25,160 Speaker 2: is one in which technology serves humanity, not to plant it, 101 00:06:25,720 --> 00:06:31,000 Speaker 2: where convivial tools empower individuals and communities, fostering creativity and 102 00:06:31,040 --> 00:06:34,000 Speaker 2: autonomy while preventing the concentration of power in the hands 103 00:06:34,000 --> 00:06:39,920 Speaker 2: of the few. According to il conviviality is individual freedom 104 00:06:40,080 --> 00:06:44,880 Speaker 2: realized in personal interdependence. It's basically the ability of individuals 105 00:06:44,880 --> 00:06:49,320 Speaker 2: to interact and to interact creatively and autonomously with others 106 00:06:49,360 --> 00:06:52,960 Speaker 2: and the environment to satisfy their individual and collective needs. 107 00:06:54,040 --> 00:06:57,520 Speaker 2: Convivial tools are those which are robust and durable, preserve 108 00:06:57,640 --> 00:07:01,719 Speaker 2: or enhance ecosystems, level unequal power relationships, and give each 109 00:07:01,760 --> 00:07:04,719 Speaker 2: person who uses them the greatest opportunity to enrich the 110 00:07:04,839 --> 00:07:07,800 Speaker 2: environment with the fruits of their vision. And a convivial 111 00:07:07,920 --> 00:07:11,360 Speaker 2: society is one in which tools, which, according to ilag 112 00:07:11,480 --> 00:07:16,800 Speaker 2: includes physical hardware, productive institutions, and productive systems. So tools 113 00:07:16,840 --> 00:07:23,880 Speaker 2: will be factories, hospitals, schools, farms, all of those things 114 00:07:23,880 --> 00:07:26,520 Speaker 2: are being included in his definition of tools, and a 115 00:07:26,560 --> 00:07:29,040 Speaker 2: convivial society is one of which those tools operate on 116 00:07:29,080 --> 00:07:33,120 Speaker 2: the humans scale and save the people instead of rulers. 117 00:07:45,040 --> 00:07:47,720 Speaker 2: The idea of convivial tools really challenges us to view 118 00:07:47,720 --> 00:07:51,120 Speaker 2: technologies and means to enhance our lives rather than displace 119 00:07:51,120 --> 00:07:54,400 Speaker 2: our livelihoods. It's a call to harness innovation for the 120 00:07:54,440 --> 00:07:58,840 Speaker 2: bettering of society instead of the perpetuation of radical monopolies, 121 00:08:00,240 --> 00:08:02,920 Speaker 2: which I spoke about in a previous it can happen 122 00:08:02,960 --> 00:08:07,679 Speaker 2: here episode. I think a Lodites like John Booth would 123 00:08:07,720 --> 00:08:12,800 Speaker 2: have certainly appreciated that message, yea, and to the rights 124 00:08:12,800 --> 00:08:17,360 Speaker 2: of today certainly do because yeah, I'm not the first 125 00:08:17,480 --> 00:08:20,040 Speaker 2: nor the only person to see lessons to be learned 126 00:08:20,280 --> 00:08:24,000 Speaker 2: from the la Lite movement. The concept of a Neolodite 127 00:08:24,040 --> 00:08:26,720 Speaker 2: movement has been embraced by a variety of folks who 128 00:08:27,080 --> 00:08:30,200 Speaker 2: may or may not understand what the original Latite movement 129 00:08:30,240 --> 00:08:33,440 Speaker 2: was about. Like, you know, you have these primitivists who 130 00:08:33,520 --> 00:08:36,080 Speaker 2: embrace the Neolotte cause because I think it means hate 131 00:08:36,120 --> 00:08:39,160 Speaker 2: and technology, and you have the anarchists and the trade 132 00:08:39,240 --> 00:08:42,360 Speaker 2: unionists and the environmentalists. We're looking more at the label, 133 00:08:42,480 --> 00:08:45,920 Speaker 2: organized and roots of the original Latite movement, and of 134 00:08:45,920 --> 00:08:49,920 Speaker 2: course even see echoes of you know, Ogloodite action in 135 00:08:50,080 --> 00:08:52,599 Speaker 2: the vandalism against self driving cars. 136 00:08:53,200 --> 00:08:54,640 Speaker 3: Yeah, yeah, yeah. 137 00:08:55,120 --> 00:09:00,360 Speaker 2: The Neolodite movement is composed of activists, workers, scholars, and 138 00:09:00,400 --> 00:09:04,040 Speaker 2: social critics who stand against the predominant worldview that unbridled 139 00:09:04,080 --> 00:09:08,560 Speaker 2: technology represents progress, point ins key, then critiques, and in 140 00:09:08,559 --> 00:09:12,320 Speaker 2: some cases actual action against technologies and tech companies who 141 00:09:12,360 --> 00:09:17,560 Speaker 2: desecrate our planet and our society. Philosopher Lewis Mumford, who 142 00:09:17,559 --> 00:09:20,840 Speaker 2: had written the Myth of the Machine Pentagonic Power, reminds 143 00:09:20,920 --> 00:09:25,520 Speaker 2: us that technology encompasses more than just physical objects. It 144 00:09:25,559 --> 00:09:29,240 Speaker 2: also includes the techniques of operation and the social organizations 145 00:09:29,440 --> 00:09:31,160 Speaker 2: that make up particular technology work. 146 00:09:31,840 --> 00:09:34,400 Speaker 1: Technology reflects our worldview. 147 00:09:35,320 --> 00:09:38,240 Speaker 2: The forms of technology we embrace, whether they be machines, techniques, 148 00:09:38,280 --> 00:09:42,160 Speaker 2: or social structures, are seemply rooted in our perception of life, death, 149 00:09:42,440 --> 00:09:45,640 Speaker 2: human potential, and the relationships between humans and nature. 150 00:09:46,440 --> 00:09:50,160 Speaker 1: Our choice of technology, in many ways, mirrors. 151 00:09:49,760 --> 00:09:53,439 Speaker 2: Our outlook on the world. That outlook in the modern 152 00:09:53,440 --> 00:09:56,520 Speaker 2: world is shaped by a rather mechanistic approach to life, 153 00:09:56,920 --> 00:10:02,880 Speaker 2: characterized by rational thinking, efficiency, delitarianism, scientific detachment, and a 154 00:10:02,920 --> 00:10:06,920 Speaker 2: belief in humanities, ownership and supremacy over nature. That's a yeah, 155 00:10:06,960 --> 00:10:09,720 Speaker 2: we're going to text like the military industrial complex, and 156 00:10:09,760 --> 00:10:16,040 Speaker 2: they weren't sprawl. Honestly, in a sense, the old ltites 157 00:10:16,559 --> 00:10:20,720 Speaker 2: kind of had it easy. Not I mean, obviously their 158 00:10:20,720 --> 00:10:24,320 Speaker 2: conditions were horrible. When I say they had it easy, 159 00:10:24,360 --> 00:10:26,600 Speaker 2: I mean it's in the sense that their machines could 160 00:10:26,840 --> 00:10:28,480 Speaker 2: be destroyed by their sledgehammers. 161 00:10:29,000 --> 00:10:32,000 Speaker 1: Right, yeah, yeah, what technology is a lot more ephemoral. 162 00:10:32,280 --> 00:10:34,520 Speaker 1: You know, it's in the cloud. 163 00:10:35,840 --> 00:10:38,880 Speaker 2: It's as nebulous as microplastics in the soil, the water, 164 00:10:38,960 --> 00:10:41,480 Speaker 2: and the breast milk. I mean, it's everywhere, and it's 165 00:10:41,520 --> 00:10:43,560 Speaker 2: integrated into everything. It's like, where do you even begin? 166 00:10:44,320 --> 00:10:44,560 Speaker 3: Yeah? 167 00:10:44,600 --> 00:10:44,840 Speaker 1: Wow. 168 00:10:47,000 --> 00:10:51,120 Speaker 2: In the book When Technology Wounds by Psychologists Childish Clendening 169 00:10:51,760 --> 00:10:57,880 Speaker 2: by psychologists Chellis Clendening, she studied technology survivors, people who 170 00:10:57,920 --> 00:11:00,880 Speaker 2: had suffered injury or illness in recent years after being 171 00:11:00,920 --> 00:11:05,000 Speaker 2: exposed to various toxic technologies in their homes and workplaces, 172 00:11:05,400 --> 00:11:11,160 Speaker 2: whether nuclear, radiation, pesticides, asbestos, both control devices, or drugs, 173 00:11:11,640 --> 00:11:13,520 Speaker 2: and covered how they had begun to question not only 174 00:11:13,559 --> 00:11:18,000 Speaker 2: the processes that maimed them, but the world that indifferently 175 00:11:18,120 --> 00:11:22,040 Speaker 2: forced those processes on them under the guise of progress. 176 00:11:24,120 --> 00:11:26,640 Speaker 2: Glendoning saw these victims as the basis of a new 177 00:11:26,679 --> 00:11:30,240 Speaker 2: bloodlight movement struggling against what has been called the Second 178 00:11:30,320 --> 00:11:34,920 Speaker 2: Industrial what has been called the Second Industrial Revolution. Alongside 179 00:11:34,960 --> 00:11:39,360 Speaker 2: thinkers like Lewis Mumford and Ivan Ilich, those survivors have 180 00:11:39,400 --> 00:11:41,839 Speaker 2: gone on to create groups such as Asbestos Victims of 181 00:11:41,880 --> 00:11:46,760 Speaker 2: America Aspartame, Victims of their Friends, Citizens Against Pesticide Misuse, 182 00:11:47,120 --> 00:11:51,400 Speaker 2: DALK and Shield Information Network des action In, National National 183 00:11:51,440 --> 00:11:55,960 Speaker 2: Association of Atomic Veterans, National Committee for Victims of Human Research, 184 00:11:56,320 --> 00:12:00,679 Speaker 2: National Toxics Campaign, and the VDT Coalition, of course are 185 00:12:00,679 --> 00:12:03,640 Speaker 2: based in the US, and there are also actives groups 186 00:12:03,679 --> 00:12:07,200 Speaker 2: like earth First that could could have been classified under 187 00:12:07,240 --> 00:12:11,199 Speaker 2: the Neolotte cause and Earthful strategy was to stop environmental 188 00:12:11,200 --> 00:12:12,280 Speaker 2: intrusions by. 189 00:12:12,080 --> 00:12:14,600 Speaker 1: Any means available, legal and otherwise. 190 00:12:14,960 --> 00:12:18,400 Speaker 2: So they would be slashing engines, slashing tires, disabling engines, 191 00:12:18,720 --> 00:12:22,920 Speaker 2: blocking roads. Most famously, they would drilled spikes into trees 192 00:12:22,960 --> 00:12:26,840 Speaker 2: and wilderness forests to prevent them from being logged by chainsaws. 193 00:12:26,960 --> 00:12:29,920 Speaker 3: Yeah. 194 00:12:30,080 --> 00:12:32,679 Speaker 2: But you know, while all these movements and organizations are 195 00:12:32,679 --> 00:12:34,960 Speaker 2: happening in the Western world, it really wasn't just the 196 00:12:34,960 --> 00:12:38,680 Speaker 2: Western world where this is happening. A positive undercurrent of 197 00:12:38,679 --> 00:12:42,480 Speaker 2: the right spirit has surged where indigenous peoples have led 198 00:12:42,480 --> 00:12:46,080 Speaker 2: the charges against the incursions of industrialism. Quncities are mainly 199 00:12:46,120 --> 00:12:49,640 Speaker 2: resisting the machines and projects from dustrialization, but also pushing 200 00:12:49,679 --> 00:12:53,840 Speaker 2: back against its cultural impact. Peasants and farmers staunchally rejecting 201 00:12:53,920 --> 00:12:57,800 Speaker 2: participation in the various development initiatives imposed upon them by 202 00:12:57,800 --> 00:13:01,440 Speaker 2: compliant governments, often in the inence, often under the influence 203 00:13:01,480 --> 00:13:04,680 Speaker 2: of entities like the World Bank or the US State Department. 204 00:13:05,679 --> 00:13:09,120 Speaker 2: For example, during the early nineteen eighties, some farmers in 205 00:13:09,160 --> 00:13:12,120 Speaker 2: Mali took a stand against the construction of dams and 206 00:13:12,200 --> 00:13:15,079 Speaker 2: dykes for a rice growing program that they wanted no 207 00:13:15,240 --> 00:13:19,000 Speaker 2: part of. Other communities elsewhere have rallied to hold dam 208 00:13:19,120 --> 00:13:22,600 Speaker 2: projects that threatened to submerge their ancestral lands, and some 209 00:13:22,679 --> 00:13:25,800 Speaker 2: of them successful, as seen of the villagers who protested 210 00:13:25,840 --> 00:13:28,840 Speaker 2: the Narmada Dam in India in the early nineteen nineties, 211 00:13:29,320 --> 00:13:32,920 Speaker 2: and others have faced more daunting challenges, like the people 212 00:13:32,960 --> 00:13:36,199 Speaker 2: of eastern Java who protested against the Neper Irrigation Dam 213 00:13:36,520 --> 00:13:40,160 Speaker 2: and faced deadly consequences at the hands of Indonesian security 214 00:13:40,200 --> 00:13:46,680 Speaker 2: forces in nineteen ninety three. Intergous tribes have also organized 215 00:13:46,720 --> 00:13:50,240 Speaker 2: to combat deforestation and road building projects that encroached upon 216 00:13:50,280 --> 00:13:54,040 Speaker 2: their territories. The Chipco tree huggan movement in India during 217 00:13:54,080 --> 00:13:57,600 Speaker 2: the nineteen seventies and eighties famously succeeded in stopping government 218 00:13:57,600 --> 00:14:01,280 Speaker 2: clear cutting efforts and similar projects of echoed across the globe, 219 00:14:01,400 --> 00:14:05,240 Speaker 2: from Malaysia to Australia, Brazil to Costa Rica, Solomon Islands, 220 00:14:05,240 --> 00:14:10,040 Speaker 2: Indonesia and beyond. Traditional fishermen in many regions, such as 221 00:14:10,040 --> 00:14:13,920 Speaker 2: the Indians of continent, Malaysia, Indonesia, and multiple ports along 222 00:14:13,960 --> 00:14:17,040 Speaker 2: the Pacific coast of South America including Ecuador and Columbia, 223 00:14:17,160 --> 00:14:20,120 Speaker 2: have also taken action against industrial fish and fleets encroaching 224 00:14:20,200 --> 00:14:23,840 Speaker 2: on their waters and jeopardizing their livelihoods. In some cases, 225 00:14:23,880 --> 00:14:27,760 Speaker 2: these protests may have involved the destruction of machinery, but sabotage, 226 00:14:27,800 --> 00:14:29,520 Speaker 2: you know, is not unheard of, like in the case 227 00:14:29,560 --> 00:14:32,040 Speaker 2: of a high tech chemical plant in Thailand in nineteen 228 00:14:32,080 --> 00:14:37,200 Speaker 2: eighty six. The driving force behind these actions really mirrors 229 00:14:37,240 --> 00:14:40,040 Speaker 2: to ethos you know, as they share this full und 230 00:14:40,040 --> 00:14:42,600 Speaker 2: desire to preserve the traditional ways of life and livelihood 231 00:14:42,920 --> 00:14:46,080 Speaker 2: in the face of industrial capitalisms relentless pull towards a 232 00:14:46,120 --> 00:14:50,160 Speaker 2: wage and market system. And then, of course, outside these 233 00:14:50,160 --> 00:14:54,400 Speaker 2: movers and shakers, these underground activists, there are also you know, 234 00:14:54,440 --> 00:15:01,160 Speaker 2: the philosophical lirites. Like the aforementioned illage. The Neola spectrum 235 00:15:01,400 --> 00:15:05,840 Speaker 2: is more diverse and intriguing than one might imagine. While 236 00:15:05,880 --> 00:15:09,040 Speaker 2: it may not have crystallized into a more formal movement 237 00:15:09,200 --> 00:15:12,760 Speaker 2: with clear representatives, as is expected of movements these days, 238 00:15:13,360 --> 00:15:16,480 Speaker 2: it unites a wide array of individuals to share common 239 00:15:16,560 --> 00:15:20,880 Speaker 2: awakening from the allure of unchecked technology and resist various 240 00:15:20,920 --> 00:15:26,760 Speaker 2: aspects of the industrial monoculture. Perhaps in the connections between 241 00:15:26,760 --> 00:15:29,920 Speaker 2: these separate groups strengthen we'd see a greater recognition of 242 00:15:29,960 --> 00:15:34,800 Speaker 2: the interconnected challenges in this grand tapestry of all evolving world. 243 00:15:35,240 --> 00:15:37,680 Speaker 2: But the thing is to address the challenges posed by 244 00:15:37,720 --> 00:15:41,320 Speaker 2: these technologies. It's not enough to merely regulate or eliminate 245 00:15:41,320 --> 00:15:45,520 Speaker 2: in visual items like pesticides or nuclear weapons. What's required 246 00:15:45,520 --> 00:15:48,480 Speaker 2: as a profound shift in our thinking about humanity and 247 00:15:48,560 --> 00:15:52,200 Speaker 2: in our relationship to life itself. We need to craft 248 00:15:52,680 --> 00:15:56,040 Speaker 2: a new worldview that paves the way for a different 249 00:15:56,040 --> 00:15:58,960 Speaker 2: way of interacting with our world, our technologies, and our 250 00:15:58,960 --> 00:15:59,920 Speaker 2: fellow human beings. 251 00:16:01,280 --> 00:16:02,800 Speaker 1: We need to reconsider a. 252 00:16:02,840 --> 00:16:04,760 Speaker 2: Place in the ground scheme of things and to imagine 253 00:16:04,760 --> 00:16:08,520 Speaker 2: a world where harmony and balance take precedence of a 254 00:16:08,640 --> 00:16:14,440 Speaker 2: domination and control. In Notes toward a Neulart Manifesto written 255 00:16:14,440 --> 00:16:18,560 Speaker 2: in nineteen ninety also by Cheldish, Clendoning, The author outlines 256 00:16:18,640 --> 00:16:22,400 Speaker 2: three core principles and four prescriptions that could drive the 257 00:16:22,400 --> 00:16:26,240 Speaker 2: Neulrite movement. In terms of principles, firstly, and I suppose 258 00:16:26,280 --> 00:16:31,760 Speaker 2: most essentially to addressing the misconception, Neulorites are not anti technology. 259 00:16:32,840 --> 00:16:36,560 Speaker 2: Actually says technology is intrinsic to human creativity and culture. 260 00:16:37,200 --> 00:16:39,320 Speaker 2: But what they oppose are the kinds of technologies that 261 00:16:39,360 --> 00:16:44,520 Speaker 2: are at root destructive of human lives and communities. The 262 00:16:44,600 --> 00:16:49,800 Speaker 2: next principle two is that all technologies are political. Quote 263 00:16:50,200 --> 00:16:54,440 Speaker 2: a social critic Gerrymander rights in four argumented Elimination of Television, 264 00:16:55,040 --> 00:16:56,960 Speaker 2: a book I read some years ago, by the way 265 00:16:56,960 --> 00:17:01,080 Speaker 2: that a Ferminian to revisit. But continuing the quote, technologies 266 00:17:01,120 --> 00:17:03,440 Speaker 2: are not neutral tools that can be used for good 267 00:17:03,560 --> 00:17:06,600 Speaker 2: or evil dependent on who uses them. They are entities 268 00:17:06,640 --> 00:17:09,880 Speaker 2: that have been consciously structured to reflect and serve specific, 269 00:17:09,920 --> 00:17:14,680 Speaker 2: powerful interests in specific historical situations. The technology is created 270 00:17:14,680 --> 00:17:17,840 Speaker 2: by mass technological society. Are those that serve the perpetuation 271 00:17:18,080 --> 00:17:20,760 Speaker 2: of mass technological society. They tend to be structured for 272 00:17:20,760 --> 00:17:25,840 Speaker 2: short term efficiency, ease of production, distribution, marketing and profit potential, 273 00:17:26,359 --> 00:17:29,080 Speaker 2: or for war making. As a result, they tend to 274 00:17:29,080 --> 00:17:32,280 Speaker 2: create rigid social systems and institutions that people do not 275 00:17:32,440 --> 00:17:38,320 Speaker 2: understand and cannot change or control. The last principle three 276 00:17:38,600 --> 00:17:42,040 Speaker 2: is that the personal view of technology is dangerously limited. 277 00:17:43,080 --> 00:17:46,960 Speaker 2: Glendening argues that the oftenhood message, but I couldn't live 278 00:17:47,000 --> 00:17:49,879 Speaker 2: without my mood processor. 279 00:17:49,880 --> 00:17:52,560 Speaker 1: Because of course she's right in this. You know, years 280 00:17:52,560 --> 00:17:53,080 Speaker 1: and yeares ago. 281 00:17:53,240 --> 00:17:56,440 Speaker 3: Yeah, yeah, you have my word automatic typewriter. 282 00:17:57,400 --> 00:18:00,840 Speaker 2: Yeah, but this oftenhod message that I couldn't live up 283 00:18:00,880 --> 00:18:02,880 Speaker 2: my word process. So, and I guess you could substitute 284 00:18:02,920 --> 00:18:07,960 Speaker 2: that for smartphone, not computer. That message denies the wider 285 00:18:08,000 --> 00:18:12,119 Speaker 2: consequences of widespread use of computers, for example, the toxic 286 00:18:12,160 --> 00:18:15,600 Speaker 2: contamination of workers and electronic plants, or the certifying of 287 00:18:15,640 --> 00:18:19,000 Speaker 2: corporate power through exclusive access to new information and databases. 288 00:18:20,080 --> 00:18:25,400 Speaker 2: As Manda points out, producers and disseminators of technologies tend 289 00:18:25,440 --> 00:18:30,439 Speaker 2: to introduce their creations and upbeat utopian terms. You know, 290 00:18:30,520 --> 00:18:34,000 Speaker 2: pesticides will increase yields to feed a hungry planet. Nuclear 291 00:18:34,080 --> 00:18:36,600 Speaker 2: energy will be too deep, too cheap to meter. 292 00:18:36,680 --> 00:18:37,200 Speaker 1: Et cetera. 293 00:18:38,000 --> 00:18:39,399 Speaker 2: And of course you know you have to throw in 294 00:18:39,440 --> 00:18:45,280 Speaker 2: that potshot had nuclear energy. It's very very twentieth century 295 00:18:45,280 --> 00:18:51,120 Speaker 2: coded text. Yeah, however, quote. Learning to critique technology demands 296 00:18:51,119 --> 00:18:55,880 Speaker 2: fully examining its sociological context, economic gratifications, and political meanings. 297 00:18:56,359 --> 00:18:58,960 Speaker 2: It involves asking not just what is gained for what 298 00:18:59,080 --> 00:19:01,439 Speaker 2: is lost and by who. It also looking at the 299 00:19:01,480 --> 00:19:04,320 Speaker 2: introduction of technologies from the perspective not only a few 300 00:19:04,359 --> 00:19:07,040 Speaker 2: in use, but of their impact on other living beings, 301 00:19:07,400 --> 00:19:13,320 Speaker 2: natural systems, and the environment. And then there's the neololide program, 302 00:19:13,359 --> 00:19:15,760 Speaker 2: which loses me a bit at some points, even where 303 00:19:15,800 --> 00:19:19,320 Speaker 2: I may agree with some of their principles, and you know, 304 00:19:19,720 --> 00:19:22,240 Speaker 2: you might say that's a sign of my propagandized mind 305 00:19:22,320 --> 00:19:24,480 Speaker 2: in our technological society. 306 00:19:24,640 --> 00:19:27,119 Speaker 1: But I'll leave you to be the judge of that. 307 00:19:27,880 --> 00:19:33,640 Speaker 2: Here's what Glendening explicitly proposes one, as I moved toward 308 00:19:33,720 --> 00:19:36,480 Speaker 2: dealing with the consequences of modern technologies and preventing further 309 00:19:36,560 --> 00:19:39,240 Speaker 2: destruction of life, the new Lolite movement should favor the 310 00:19:39,240 --> 00:19:46,000 Speaker 2: dismantling of nuclear technologies, chemical technologies, genetic engineering technologies, television, 311 00:19:46,480 --> 00:19:52,640 Speaker 2: electromagnetic technologies, and computer technologies, which, according to them, you know, 312 00:19:52,960 --> 00:19:56,440 Speaker 2: according to her Coales, disease and death create dangerous me 313 00:19:56,520 --> 00:19:59,919 Speaker 2: to gens. In case of television functions, as a centralized 314 00:20:00,040 --> 00:20:04,600 Speaker 2: I'm controlling force, poisons. 315 00:20:04,240 --> 00:20:05,760 Speaker 1: The environment, all these different things. 316 00:20:05,760 --> 00:20:07,440 Speaker 2: And I mean I gets some of the justifications for 317 00:20:07,480 --> 00:20:10,720 Speaker 2: some of these technologies, right, Yeah, of course, disease, death, 318 00:20:11,200 --> 00:20:16,320 Speaker 2: you know, pollution, social issue is right, yeah, But I 319 00:20:16,800 --> 00:20:18,320 Speaker 2: at same time, I don't believe in through and I 320 00:20:18,440 --> 00:20:20,119 Speaker 2: was entire sciences and technologies. 321 00:20:20,119 --> 00:20:21,600 Speaker 1: Who will see like that? 322 00:20:21,640 --> 00:20:24,560 Speaker 2: You know, it feels like it feels like a very 323 00:20:24,760 --> 00:20:27,520 Speaker 2: myopic view being presented on some of these texts. 324 00:20:27,840 --> 00:20:31,159 Speaker 3: Yeah, I mean, I guess this was before really the 325 00:20:31,240 --> 00:20:35,119 Speaker 3: decentralization of some of the means of dissemination of information 326 00:20:35,240 --> 00:20:38,480 Speaker 3: that happened kind of later on with things like some 327 00:20:38,520 --> 00:20:40,080 Speaker 3: parts of the Internet. I don't want to say by 328 00:20:40,080 --> 00:20:43,840 Speaker 3: any means of the Internet is decentralized, but at least 329 00:20:43,880 --> 00:20:47,159 Speaker 3: the promise of that which we occasionally see deliver as well, right, 330 00:20:47,320 --> 00:20:50,520 Speaker 3: Like if you saw today that I was just watching 331 00:20:50,560 --> 00:20:53,879 Speaker 3: a video of the Yeppe Gay in Syria that the 332 00:20:54,000 --> 00:20:58,760 Speaker 3: people in Rajaba like talking about the importance of women 333 00:20:58,760 --> 00:21:02,160 Speaker 3: in the revolution in me and and like just occasionally 334 00:21:03,000 --> 00:21:05,280 Speaker 3: the internet or technology gives us the thing they were 335 00:21:05,280 --> 00:21:10,080 Speaker 3: supposed to give us, a disability to connect without barriers. Absolutely, 336 00:21:11,320 --> 00:21:14,159 Speaker 3: but yeah, like you said that that's the computer or 337 00:21:14,200 --> 00:21:16,000 Speaker 3: the cell phone and that was recorded on or whatever 338 00:21:16,080 --> 00:21:20,360 Speaker 3: happened because somebody somebody in the congo and in horrific 339 00:21:20,440 --> 00:21:24,120 Speaker 3: conditions and the DC had to dig out some rare 340 00:21:24,119 --> 00:21:26,560 Speaker 3: earth chemical and then got paid next to nothing and 341 00:21:27,520 --> 00:21:31,480 Speaker 3: their ancestral homeland was ruined by some rabid company that 342 00:21:31,720 --> 00:21:33,720 Speaker 3: makes billions of dollars and pays people like shit. 343 00:21:34,920 --> 00:21:35,160 Speaker 1: Yeah. 344 00:21:35,800 --> 00:21:38,840 Speaker 2: Yeah, So, I mean, I absolutely agree that the supply 345 00:21:39,080 --> 00:21:43,520 Speaker 2: side of a lot of these technologies need to change drastically. Yeah, 346 00:21:43,560 --> 00:21:45,760 Speaker 2: and also the you know, just the supply gene as 347 00:21:45,800 --> 00:21:48,879 Speaker 2: a whole, you know, from the raw materials to the 348 00:21:48,920 --> 00:21:52,640 Speaker 2: finished product and how it gets to us. I mean, 349 00:21:52,680 --> 00:21:55,480 Speaker 2: that might mean no more of certain technologies, or it 350 00:21:55,520 --> 00:21:58,320 Speaker 2: might mean a different approach, but it really remains to 351 00:21:58,320 --> 00:22:02,679 Speaker 2: be seen. We really haven't tried other approaches because you know, 352 00:22:02,720 --> 00:22:15,840 Speaker 2: we live under this capitalist hegemony. The next step in 353 00:22:15,880 --> 00:22:20,000 Speaker 2: the program to the New Rite movement should favor a 354 00:22:20,040 --> 00:22:23,280 Speaker 2: search for new technological forms and the creation of technologies 355 00:22:23,320 --> 00:22:27,200 Speaker 2: by the people directly involved in their use, not by scientists, 356 00:22:27,280 --> 00:22:31,200 Speaker 2: engineers and entrepreneurs who gain financially from mass production and 357 00:22:31,240 --> 00:22:33,800 Speaker 2: distribution of the inventions. I don't know little about the 358 00:22:33,800 --> 00:22:37,680 Speaker 2: context in which their technologies are used. I don't necessarily 359 00:22:37,680 --> 00:22:40,199 Speaker 2: believe in, you know, splitting it down the middle like that, 360 00:22:40,440 --> 00:22:43,439 Speaker 2: as if you know, scientists and engineers are not going 361 00:22:43,480 --> 00:22:45,000 Speaker 2: to be the people that are directly involved in their use. 362 00:22:45,040 --> 00:22:47,639 Speaker 1: And in some cases that's true. 363 00:22:47,800 --> 00:22:50,800 Speaker 2: But another case is, you know, you know, people who 364 00:22:50,840 --> 00:22:52,919 Speaker 2: are using the pros sometimes the people who invented it. 365 00:22:53,280 --> 00:22:54,879 Speaker 1: Yeah, iterated on that to whatnot? 366 00:22:55,200 --> 00:22:58,480 Speaker 3: Like when I think about before there were three D 367 00:22:58,520 --> 00:23:01,119 Speaker 3: printing weapons in a revution in the amber, they were 368 00:23:01,160 --> 00:23:04,000 Speaker 3: three D printing press theses because land minds are so 369 00:23:04,080 --> 00:23:07,800 Speaker 3: common there, right, and so like for those people where 370 00:23:07,800 --> 00:23:10,439 Speaker 3: the engineer is a person whose brother or sister or 371 00:23:10,600 --> 00:23:13,440 Speaker 3: non binary sibling or what have you needs a leg, 372 00:23:13,960 --> 00:23:16,639 Speaker 3: and so they have iterated or designed a leg, and 373 00:23:16,760 --> 00:23:20,320 Speaker 3: like that person is very much both like benefiting from 374 00:23:20,320 --> 00:23:23,400 Speaker 3: the end use and doing the engineering exactly. 375 00:23:23,600 --> 00:23:25,760 Speaker 2: I get this is kind of like, you know, a 376 00:23:25,840 --> 00:23:28,080 Speaker 2: screed against the Ivory tower types. 377 00:23:28,200 --> 00:23:31,200 Speaker 1: But yes, I don't think that reflects on you know, 378 00:23:31,480 --> 00:23:32,080 Speaker 1: all of. 379 00:23:31,960 --> 00:23:36,639 Speaker 2: The or even most of the scientists and engineers. A 380 00:23:36,680 --> 00:23:40,479 Speaker 2: lot of engineers on the ground, a lot of you know, 381 00:23:40,680 --> 00:23:44,000 Speaker 2: barefoot scientists as the expression is. 382 00:23:44,400 --> 00:23:47,399 Speaker 3: Yeah, yeah, Nick, when we talk about things like permaculture 383 00:23:47,600 --> 00:23:50,119 Speaker 3: or the things we talked about before, like, some of 384 00:23:50,119 --> 00:23:52,560 Speaker 3: that is a science too, right. We have a thesis 385 00:23:52,560 --> 00:23:54,679 Speaker 3: and we test it and we prove it, and we 386 00:23:54,800 --> 00:23:58,199 Speaker 3: keep iterating on it like it's a hypothesis, I should say, Like, 387 00:23:59,119 --> 00:24:01,399 Speaker 3: and that's certainly a sign which is rooted in a 388 00:24:01,440 --> 00:24:03,520 Speaker 3: place and people and respect for the environment. 389 00:24:04,400 --> 00:24:08,840 Speaker 2: Yeah, I mean the manifesto goes a little bit further 390 00:24:08,960 --> 00:24:12,159 Speaker 2: on this particular point. You know, she's advocating for the 391 00:24:12,200 --> 00:24:14,600 Speaker 2: creation of technologies that are of a scale and structure 392 00:24:14,640 --> 00:24:16,880 Speaker 2: that makes them understandable to the people who use them 393 00:24:16,920 --> 00:24:19,720 Speaker 2: and are affected by them. She's advocating for the creation 394 00:24:19,760 --> 00:24:22,160 Speaker 2: of technology is built with a high degree of flexibility, 395 00:24:22,520 --> 00:24:24,159 Speaker 2: so that you do want to impose a rigid and 396 00:24:24,240 --> 00:24:27,320 Speaker 2: iror woosibile imprint on their users. And she's advocating for 397 00:24:27,359 --> 00:24:30,479 Speaker 2: the creation of technologies are foster independence from technological addiction 398 00:24:30,880 --> 00:24:35,080 Speaker 2: and promise political freedom, economic justice, and ecological balance. 399 00:24:36,960 --> 00:24:38,880 Speaker 1: They are I can't disagree, you know. 400 00:24:39,240 --> 00:24:40,960 Speaker 3: Yeah, I know, I'm down with that. 401 00:24:41,680 --> 00:24:44,080 Speaker 1: I'm absolutely down with advocating for that. 402 00:24:44,400 --> 00:24:46,280 Speaker 3: Yeah. 403 00:24:46,320 --> 00:24:50,479 Speaker 2: The third point in the program, she says, we favor 404 00:24:50,520 --> 00:24:55,320 Speaker 2: the creation of technologies in which politics, morality, ecology, and 405 00:24:55,440 --> 00:24:58,480 Speaker 2: technics are merged for the benefits of life on Earth. 406 00:24:59,240 --> 00:25:03,040 Speaker 2: For example, community based energy sources utilizing solar, wind and 407 00:25:03,080 --> 00:25:10,000 Speaker 2: water technologies, organic biological technologies and agriculture, engineering, architecture, art, medicine, transportation, 408 00:25:10,160 --> 00:25:15,159 Speaker 2: and defense, conflict resolution technologies which emphasize cooperation, understanding, and 409 00:25:15,240 --> 00:25:20,879 Speaker 2: continuity of relationship, and decentralized social technologies which encourage participation, responsibility, 410 00:25:21,160 --> 00:25:26,600 Speaker 2: and empowerment. Now you know, I'm the solar punk guy. 411 00:25:27,080 --> 00:25:30,840 Speaker 2: I'm the you know, the anarchists on you tube whatever. 412 00:25:31,400 --> 00:25:32,359 Speaker 1: You got me on these. 413 00:25:33,200 --> 00:25:36,439 Speaker 2: You know, I agree with all of these obviously, But 414 00:25:36,760 --> 00:25:40,159 Speaker 2: what I find interesting is that this list seems to 415 00:25:40,240 --> 00:25:44,560 Speaker 2: ignore how, you know, the technology is being advocated here 416 00:25:45,400 --> 00:25:46,320 Speaker 2: are linked to. 417 00:25:46,240 --> 00:25:49,720 Speaker 1: The previous technologies that would just be in decride. 418 00:25:49,800 --> 00:25:52,720 Speaker 2: You know, like in one section she's talking about, you know, 419 00:25:52,800 --> 00:25:56,720 Speaker 2: a fan of these chemical technologies, but chemistry is an 420 00:25:56,760 --> 00:26:02,359 Speaker 2: inevitable component of the biological technology advocating for are You're 421 00:26:02,359 --> 00:26:06,679 Speaker 2: saying that you don't like computer technologies, but when you're 422 00:26:06,720 --> 00:26:09,600 Speaker 2: talking about like solar wind and water energy, which to. 423 00:26:09,560 --> 00:26:13,840 Speaker 1: Be fair, can be low tech too. Yeah, there is usually. 424 00:26:13,480 --> 00:26:20,439 Speaker 2: Some involvement of a computer in those energy systems. So 425 00:26:20,520 --> 00:26:27,280 Speaker 2: I think there's sights inconsistency there, But I don't know, 426 00:26:27,320 --> 00:26:27,879 Speaker 2: what do you think? 427 00:26:28,240 --> 00:26:33,160 Speaker 3: Yeah, I think yeah, like we can't sort of yeah, yeah, 428 00:26:33,560 --> 00:26:36,040 Speaker 3: sometimes we can't say that to like you say, to 429 00:26:36,080 --> 00:26:38,919 Speaker 3: a degree, all of these systems will require a technology, 430 00:26:39,200 --> 00:26:42,080 Speaker 3: and like, I suppose we start to get into like 431 00:26:42,080 --> 00:26:44,560 Speaker 3: what is the technology right before we get too far, 432 00:26:45,160 --> 00:26:48,720 Speaker 3: and then I think that's probably a question worth asking. 433 00:26:49,040 --> 00:26:52,080 Speaker 3: But yeah, I think it's easy to throw the maybe 434 00:26:52,080 --> 00:26:53,240 Speaker 3: out of bar water. I suppose. 435 00:26:54,280 --> 00:26:54,520 Speaker 1: Yeah. 436 00:26:54,720 --> 00:26:59,640 Speaker 2: I mean, like like Momford it said, technology is more 437 00:26:59,640 --> 00:27:04,520 Speaker 2: than just psical objects, it's also techniques of operation organizations. 438 00:27:05,800 --> 00:27:06,920 Speaker 1: That reflects a wild view. 439 00:27:08,119 --> 00:27:11,720 Speaker 3: Yeah. Yeah, so I suppose, as you said before, right, Like, 440 00:27:12,680 --> 00:27:15,359 Speaker 3: it's what I think about often. It's like what we 441 00:27:15,400 --> 00:27:17,080 Speaker 3: need to change is the way we see the world, 442 00:27:17,920 --> 00:27:20,840 Speaker 3: and then the other stuff, well we can change. 443 00:27:20,880 --> 00:27:22,280 Speaker 1: In a MIDI will fall into place. 444 00:27:22,680 --> 00:27:26,800 Speaker 3: Yeah, I think again, I'm gonna get back. So I 445 00:27:26,800 --> 00:27:29,119 Speaker 3: was just in ros Java for the last few weeks. 446 00:27:29,160 --> 00:27:33,320 Speaker 3: But one of the things that I heard from everyone there, 447 00:27:33,400 --> 00:27:35,320 Speaker 3: right from like and not just from like people in 448 00:27:35,320 --> 00:27:38,879 Speaker 3: the women's movement, but also from like random guy in 449 00:27:38,920 --> 00:27:43,119 Speaker 3: the market who I'm having tea with is like that 450 00:27:43,240 --> 00:27:46,680 Speaker 3: this idea that we can't can't decolonize the country until 451 00:27:46,680 --> 00:27:49,119 Speaker 3: we declonize our family, and the notion that like women 452 00:27:49,160 --> 00:27:53,639 Speaker 3: were the first colonized group of people, which and so 453 00:27:53,840 --> 00:27:55,879 Speaker 3: like if we can't do gender equality, what you know, 454 00:27:56,160 --> 00:27:58,040 Speaker 3: what are we doing? What we can't Why why we 455 00:27:58,080 --> 00:28:00,800 Speaker 3: find this revolution to liberate our entry when we can't 456 00:28:00,800 --> 00:28:07,080 Speaker 3: liberate our spouse, daughter or what have you. So definitely, yeah, 457 00:28:07,119 --> 00:28:09,280 Speaker 3: it's just it's a very powerful I know it's not 458 00:28:09,400 --> 00:28:13,400 Speaker 3: like as fun as taking a sledgehammer to a cotton mill, 459 00:28:13,720 --> 00:28:20,040 Speaker 3: but like if we if we replicate that kind of 460 00:28:20,119 --> 00:28:24,960 Speaker 3: extractive extractive capitalism is what makes the supply side of 461 00:28:24,960 --> 00:28:27,399 Speaker 3: these things so bad, and it's what also leads us 462 00:28:27,440 --> 00:28:28,919 Speaker 3: to think about using them in a way that can 463 00:28:28,960 --> 00:28:33,960 Speaker 3: extract the most value from the worker. And so I 464 00:28:34,000 --> 00:28:38,240 Speaker 3: would absolutely say that, you know, the break the frame 465 00:28:38,280 --> 00:28:38,840 Speaker 3: in your mind. 466 00:28:38,920 --> 00:28:42,440 Speaker 1: I don't know, that's a good point. 467 00:28:43,200 --> 00:28:46,120 Speaker 2: And it's funny, as you mentioned, you know, as as 468 00:28:46,200 --> 00:28:49,560 Speaker 2: fun as you know, smashing a cotton a cotton mill 469 00:28:49,640 --> 00:28:50,040 Speaker 2: or whatever. 470 00:28:50,800 --> 00:28:52,880 Speaker 1: It made me think that you know, perhaps. 471 00:28:52,520 --> 00:28:56,680 Speaker 2: In a revolutionary society, I guess society. 472 00:28:56,720 --> 00:28:57,520 Speaker 1: You may see. 473 00:28:58,920 --> 00:29:02,480 Speaker 2: Therapeutic rooms where people can smash out some of their 474 00:29:02,560 --> 00:29:06,920 Speaker 2: last frustrations against the capitalist system. 475 00:29:06,080 --> 00:29:09,000 Speaker 1: Yea, consequences they have left for them to fix. 476 00:29:09,880 --> 00:29:12,560 Speaker 3: Yeah, yeah, to get that out before you you take 477 00:29:12,600 --> 00:29:13,040 Speaker 3: that out on. 478 00:29:13,000 --> 00:29:15,200 Speaker 1: Other go and rewild or something. You know, you have 479 00:29:15,240 --> 00:29:16,640 Speaker 1: to get that energy out. 480 00:29:17,080 --> 00:29:19,720 Speaker 3: Yeah yeah, yeah, yea, yeah, remove the toxicity. I like 481 00:29:19,760 --> 00:29:23,720 Speaker 3: that place where you can take that anger out. 482 00:29:24,880 --> 00:29:25,040 Speaker 1: Right. 483 00:29:25,120 --> 00:29:31,000 Speaker 2: So finally, the fourth and final element in the program, 484 00:29:31,560 --> 00:29:33,920 Speaker 2: she says that we favor the development of a life 485 00:29:34,000 --> 00:29:38,600 Speaker 2: enhancing worldview in Western technological societies. We opened in still 486 00:29:38,600 --> 00:29:41,080 Speaker 2: a perception of life, death and human potential, and technological 487 00:29:41,120 --> 00:29:44,080 Speaker 2: societies that will integrate the human need for creative expression, 488 00:29:44,360 --> 00:29:47,560 Speaker 2: spiritual experience in community with the capacity for rational thought 489 00:29:47,560 --> 00:29:50,240 Speaker 2: and functionality. We perceive the human role not as the 490 00:29:50,280 --> 00:29:53,520 Speaker 2: dominator of other species in planetary biology, but as integrated 491 00:29:53,520 --> 00:29:56,280 Speaker 2: into the natural world with appreciation for the sacredness of 492 00:29:56,320 --> 00:29:59,480 Speaker 2: all life. We foresee a sustainable future for humanity if 493 00:29:59,520 --> 00:30:03,560 Speaker 2: and when Western technological societies restructure their mechanistic projections and 494 00:30:03,680 --> 00:30:07,040 Speaker 2: foster the creation of machines, techniques, and social organizations to 495 00:30:07,120 --> 00:30:12,000 Speaker 2: respect both human dignity and the nature's wholeness and progressing towards. 496 00:30:11,720 --> 00:30:12,800 Speaker 1: Such a transition. 497 00:30:13,360 --> 00:30:15,720 Speaker 2: We are aware that we have nothing to lose except 498 00:30:15,720 --> 00:30:17,840 Speaker 2: a way of living that leads the destruction. 499 00:30:17,600 --> 00:30:21,840 Speaker 1: Of all life. We have a world to gain. And 500 00:30:22,440 --> 00:30:27,000 Speaker 1: coote word that was that. 501 00:30:27,120 --> 00:30:30,520 Speaker 3: Was a nice nice, a nice very rhetorical flair at 502 00:30:30,560 --> 00:30:30,880 Speaker 3: the end. 503 00:30:31,640 --> 00:30:32,480 Speaker 1: Yeah, that's. 504 00:30:36,160 --> 00:30:39,920 Speaker 2: I mean, in my opinion, coming to a close here, 505 00:30:40,760 --> 00:30:41,680 Speaker 2: the neololites a. 506 00:30:43,240 --> 00:30:46,600 Speaker 1: Hits and a miss. They hit a lot more than 507 00:30:46,600 --> 00:30:48,960 Speaker 1: they miss. There's things I have some slight. 508 00:30:48,840 --> 00:30:51,920 Speaker 2: Quibbles with, and I really, of course I have to 509 00:30:51,960 --> 00:30:55,120 Speaker 2: give them credit for doing a lot more to investigate 510 00:30:55,200 --> 00:30:59,000 Speaker 2: and confront technology than the vast majority of people. I mean, 511 00:30:59,040 --> 00:31:03,280 Speaker 2: they're asking the right questions, questions that you don't see 512 00:31:03,280 --> 00:31:05,320 Speaker 2: being asked at all, you know. See, you get these 513 00:31:05,320 --> 00:31:09,360 Speaker 2: announcements for new technologies, new innovations, new techniques. 514 00:31:08,920 --> 00:31:09,600 Speaker 1: New whatever. 515 00:31:10,280 --> 00:31:12,800 Speaker 2: It's always just like you know, marketing and advertising, and 516 00:31:12,840 --> 00:31:17,600 Speaker 2: then it's just implemented. There's no say of people, there's 517 00:31:17,600 --> 00:31:20,760 Speaker 2: no ad raising questions about what are the consequences of this? 518 00:31:20,880 --> 00:31:22,760 Speaker 2: Be ten years on the line, twenty years on the line, 519 00:31:22,760 --> 00:31:24,560 Speaker 2: fifty years on the line, one hundred years on the line. 520 00:31:24,600 --> 00:31:25,600 Speaker 3: You know, yeah. 521 00:31:26,240 --> 00:31:29,400 Speaker 2: Yeah, and the lessons of letters are very clear. Technology 522 00:31:29,480 --> 00:31:31,800 Speaker 2: should serve humanity, not the other way around. 523 00:31:33,800 --> 00:31:33,960 Speaker 1: Yeah. 524 00:31:34,000 --> 00:31:37,120 Speaker 3: I think that's that's a key take home, Like, Yeah, 525 00:31:37,240 --> 00:31:39,760 Speaker 3: it's there to make our lives better. We don't have 526 00:31:39,840 --> 00:31:42,600 Speaker 3: to not to allow us lands more exploited. 527 00:31:43,640 --> 00:31:48,720 Speaker 2: Yeah, landscape is vast and it's constantly evolving. But the 528 00:31:48,760 --> 00:31:52,160 Speaker 2: principles of the lights and the vision of convivial tools, 529 00:31:52,600 --> 00:31:56,280 Speaker 2: I think they can offer us some guidance. And I 530 00:31:56,320 --> 00:31:59,400 Speaker 2: hope you're way able to take that away from this 531 00:31:59,560 --> 00:32:02,600 Speaker 2: two part too. Yeah, and that's all I have for today. 532 00:32:03,000 --> 00:32:03,240 Speaker 3: Great. 533 00:32:03,280 --> 00:32:06,880 Speaker 2: Thanks you follow me on YouTube, aurism support and patroon 534 00:32:07,240 --> 00:32:11,440 Speaker 2: Slash sent Drew. Thanks James for being part of this. 535 00:32:11,880 --> 00:32:13,440 Speaker 3: I thank you. That was good. I enjoyed it. 536 00:32:13,960 --> 00:32:21,120 Speaker 1: This has been It could happen here, Peace. It could 537 00:32:21,160 --> 00:32:23,520 Speaker 1: happen here as a production of cool Zone Media. For 538 00:32:23,600 --> 00:32:26,320 Speaker 1: more podcasts from cool Zone Media, visit our website cool 539 00:32:26,400 --> 00:32:29,240 Speaker 1: zonemedia dot com, or check us out on the iHeartRadio app, 540 00:32:29,280 --> 00:32:31,040 Speaker 1: Apple Podcasts, or wherever. 541 00:32:30,720 --> 00:32:31,800 Speaker 3: You listen to podcasts. 542 00:32:32,400 --> 00:32:34,520 Speaker 1: You can find sources for It could Happen Here, updated 543 00:32:34,600 --> 00:32:37,680 Speaker 1: monthly at cool zonemedia dot com slash sources. 544 00:32:37,800 --> 00:32:38,640 Speaker 3: Thanks for listening,