WEBVTT - Adani Group's Hindenburg Moment

0:00:02.560 --> 0:00:07.000
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to Asia Centric from Bloomberg Intelligence, the podcast

0:00:07.040 --> 0:00:10.080
<v Speaker 1>that pulls back the curtain on global business so you

0:00:10.160 --> 0:00:14.400
<v Speaker 1>can invest better across the Pacific rim. I'm Tom Corvette

0:00:14.440 --> 0:00:18.360
<v Speaker 1>in Hong Kong, and I'm John Lee. India's Adani Group

0:00:18.440 --> 0:00:22.320
<v Speaker 1>is a sprawling corporate empire with ports, power and mining

0:00:22.400 --> 0:00:25.799
<v Speaker 1>driving its growth. But a bombshell report from US short

0:00:25.840 --> 0:00:30.920
<v Speaker 1>seller Hindenburg Research turned Adani's fortunes upside down almost overnight.

0:00:31.200 --> 0:00:34.440
<v Speaker 1>The resulting stock selloff wiped out more than one hundred

0:00:34.479 --> 0:00:38.479
<v Speaker 1>and thirty billion dollars in shareholder wealth. It also knocked

0:00:38.520 --> 0:00:41.559
<v Speaker 1>founder Galtam Adani out of the ranks of the world's

0:00:41.600 --> 0:00:45.760
<v Speaker 1>ten wealthiest people, spotting a crisis of confidence and a

0:00:45.880 --> 0:00:49.440
<v Speaker 1>scramble for a damage control. How could a single report

0:00:49.479 --> 0:00:52.800
<v Speaker 1>from a little known research firm send an entire corporate

0:00:52.800 --> 0:00:56.920
<v Speaker 1>empire sprawling into crisis despite its denials And what does

0:00:56.960 --> 0:01:00.200
<v Speaker 1>this mean for emerging market investors? Let's bring in three

0:01:00.280 --> 0:01:03.840
<v Speaker 1>experts from Bloomberg Intelligence to sort it all out. Kumar

0:01:03.960 --> 0:01:07.880
<v Speaker 1>Galta are emerging markets quant strategist. I think quality of

0:01:07.920 --> 0:01:11.280
<v Speaker 1>auditors is important, but I think one can't based conclusion

0:01:11.440 --> 0:01:14.279
<v Speaker 1>on the size of the Farmer loan. Sharon Chen, senior

0:01:14.319 --> 0:01:21.080
<v Speaker 1>credit analyst, transparency has actually improved. Nittan Chanduka, India equity strategist.

0:01:21.160 --> 0:01:24.199
<v Speaker 1>Adani is not India and India is not Dani Doll

0:01:24.319 --> 0:01:28.160
<v Speaker 1>three of them from Singapore. Everybody welcome as a credit

0:01:28.200 --> 0:01:31.480
<v Speaker 1>analyst who covers some of the Adani companies. How shocked

0:01:31.480 --> 0:01:35.399
<v Speaker 1>were you when the Hindenberg research report came out? So John,

0:01:35.560 --> 0:01:38.959
<v Speaker 1>the allocations in the Hindenburg research report, actually most of

0:01:39.000 --> 0:01:41.800
<v Speaker 1>them were already in the public domain. So to give

0:01:41.800 --> 0:01:45.360
<v Speaker 1>you an example, you know, the research report talked about

0:01:45.520 --> 0:01:50.960
<v Speaker 1>stock price manipulation using Offshan Mauritius funds, and there were

0:01:50.960 --> 0:01:53.760
<v Speaker 1>already reports of this like two years ago, and the

0:01:53.840 --> 0:01:57.680
<v Speaker 1>market regulator was looking into it as well, although we

0:01:57.720 --> 0:02:01.640
<v Speaker 1>didn't hear much after that. So it is surprising in

0:02:01.760 --> 0:02:06.880
<v Speaker 1>terms of the market reaction, and also putting everything together

0:02:07.000 --> 0:02:10.320
<v Speaker 1>might have been surprising, but actually some of this were

0:02:10.320 --> 0:02:13.880
<v Speaker 1>already concerns in the past, even though auditors like some

0:02:13.960 --> 0:02:16.680
<v Speaker 1>of them being not being audited by the Big Four

0:02:17.200 --> 0:02:20.200
<v Speaker 1>was known to the market. So the way the whole

0:02:20.320 --> 0:02:24.120
<v Speaker 1>report was packaged maybe probably that was a surprising event

0:02:24.120 --> 0:02:26.880
<v Speaker 1>for the market. And these shares were actually trading at

0:02:26.960 --> 0:02:30.720
<v Speaker 1>very high valuations, which is quite unheard of for an

0:02:30.720 --> 0:02:35.080
<v Speaker 1>infrastructure based group. So like maybe it just proved to

0:02:35.080 --> 0:02:38.600
<v Speaker 1>be a catalyst to click the bubble. Can you talk

0:02:38.639 --> 0:02:42.360
<v Speaker 1>about some of the valuations. The Hindenberg report mentioned that

0:02:42.600 --> 0:02:45.400
<v Speaker 1>these stocks, some of the Adani stocks went up ten

0:02:45.440 --> 0:02:48.720
<v Speaker 1>to twenty times over a three year period. They did

0:02:48.800 --> 0:02:51.840
<v Speaker 1>mention that I think Adwanni Enterprise and Total Gas were

0:02:51.880 --> 0:02:54.840
<v Speaker 1>training on like five hundred to eight hundred times pear.

0:02:55.400 --> 0:03:00.000
<v Speaker 1>They did seem quite expensive, as you mentioned for infrastructure stocks, Yeah,

0:03:00.000 --> 0:03:02.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean because of the sharp run up in the

0:03:02.360 --> 0:03:05.280
<v Speaker 1>shape prices, the stocks were actually been up to quite

0:03:05.480 --> 0:03:10.160
<v Speaker 1>unreasonable valuations, which you also point out to part of

0:03:10.240 --> 0:03:14.359
<v Speaker 1>this is probably because of like a low free float

0:03:14.400 --> 0:03:18.640
<v Speaker 1>of the group shares. So whenever a lot of liquidity

0:03:18.720 --> 0:03:22.960
<v Speaker 1>gushes into stocks with very low free float, they tend

0:03:22.960 --> 0:03:26.560
<v Speaker 1>to have more impact on the market, and maybe that

0:03:26.639 --> 0:03:29.760
<v Speaker 1>was the reason why they were fading at such high valuations.

0:03:29.800 --> 0:03:32.760
<v Speaker 1>In the Supreme Court is taking steps to probe deeper

0:03:32.760 --> 0:03:35.880
<v Speaker 1>in the Hindenberg's allegations. What signaled do you think that

0:03:36.080 --> 0:03:40.520
<v Speaker 1>sends to the public and the investment community. Ordani's well

0:03:40.560 --> 0:03:43.360
<v Speaker 1>starting the snowball or is the court stepping in because

0:03:43.360 --> 0:03:46.680
<v Speaker 1>it sees an opportunity to pull order from the jaws

0:03:46.720 --> 0:03:51.080
<v Speaker 1>of chaos. So it's difficult to comment at this point

0:03:51.120 --> 0:03:54.720
<v Speaker 1>of time why they are intervening. But actually maybe the

0:03:55.080 --> 0:03:58.720
<v Speaker 1>committee that they have appointed is actually quite quite robust

0:03:58.760 --> 0:04:02.080
<v Speaker 1>and like they comes with a very strong pedigree, and

0:04:02.160 --> 0:04:04.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure that will have a and like a clear

0:04:04.520 --> 0:04:08.880
<v Speaker 1>verdict on on this ongoing issue because these allegations keep

0:04:08.920 --> 0:04:12.160
<v Speaker 1>cropping up our periodic basis, So it will be good

0:04:12.200 --> 0:04:14.880
<v Speaker 1>for the market to have a final clarity on what

0:04:15.120 --> 0:04:17.240
<v Speaker 1>who is right and who is wrong? Sure, and chan

0:04:17.400 --> 0:04:22.160
<v Speaker 1>any thoughts on that. Obviously, Hendenburgh's report resonated with somebody

0:04:22.360 --> 0:04:26.720
<v Speaker 1>quite high up in the Indian legal and regulatory system. Well,

0:04:26.760 --> 0:04:29.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, looking in from outside, I would say that

0:04:29.200 --> 0:04:33.160
<v Speaker 1>this in a way is positive as it could increase

0:04:33.200 --> 0:04:35.480
<v Speaker 1>the chances of some sort of clarity coming out of

0:04:35.520 --> 0:04:38.760
<v Speaker 1>these sort of investigations. You know, when we talk about

0:04:38.760 --> 0:04:41.880
<v Speaker 1>some of the allegations, the focus here is really on

0:04:41.920 --> 0:04:45.960
<v Speaker 1>the alleged stock price manipulation and the related party disclosures.

0:04:46.400 --> 0:04:49.200
<v Speaker 1>So for the first one to do with the Mauritius

0:04:49.200 --> 0:04:55.000
<v Speaker 1>funds two years ago, the regulator Sabio already started an investigation,

0:04:55.040 --> 0:04:58.400
<v Speaker 1>but it when quiet. So with increased scrutiny and you

0:04:58.440 --> 0:05:01.920
<v Speaker 1>know the Supreme Court paying attention to this issue, there

0:05:01.960 --> 0:05:06.120
<v Speaker 1>seems to be more urgency to finalize the investigation and

0:05:06.160 --> 0:05:10.360
<v Speaker 1>come up with some sort of outcome. Now I think

0:05:10.360 --> 0:05:13.159
<v Speaker 1>the Court has ordered sab to report on their finding

0:05:13.200 --> 0:05:16.359
<v Speaker 1>within two months. I do believe there's some there's a

0:05:16.440 --> 0:05:18.680
<v Speaker 1>chance it could drag on beyond two months, but at

0:05:18.760 --> 0:05:21.120
<v Speaker 1>least the intention seems to be there and the scrutiny

0:05:21.200 --> 0:05:23.760
<v Speaker 1>is there. So in your assessment, this is a good thing,

0:05:23.880 --> 0:05:27.480
<v Speaker 1>not a negative for Adani and for India. Well, for Adani,

0:05:27.520 --> 0:05:29.640
<v Speaker 1>it's hard to tell because obviously it depends on the

0:05:29.640 --> 0:05:34.040
<v Speaker 1>outcome of the investigation, right, But for India, I do

0:05:34.120 --> 0:05:36.159
<v Speaker 1>think as of now, based on what I can see,

0:05:36.360 --> 0:05:39.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm looking at it more positively. Sharon A. Doney Group

0:05:39.520 --> 0:05:43.719
<v Speaker 1>does have five hundred and seventy eight subsidiaries under seven

0:05:43.760 --> 0:05:47.320
<v Speaker 1>listed companies. Now, the Hindenburg report mentioned that there was

0:05:47.400 --> 0:05:51.320
<v Speaker 1>six thousand intercompany transactions over the last year. This must

0:05:51.360 --> 0:05:54.800
<v Speaker 1>be a nightmare to analyze for a credit analyst. Um

0:05:55.160 --> 0:05:58.960
<v Speaker 1>So again, this is not unusual. I guess for such

0:05:59.000 --> 0:06:03.040
<v Speaker 1>a large conclus So to give you an example, under

0:06:03.160 --> 0:06:06.799
<v Speaker 1>a Doney Transmission, which is the power transmission company, every

0:06:06.800 --> 0:06:08.680
<v Speaker 1>time it bids for a new project, it tends to

0:06:08.720 --> 0:06:11.160
<v Speaker 1>set up a new subsidiary because then you know, you

0:06:11.520 --> 0:06:14.280
<v Speaker 1>have that subsidiary just focused on that project, and it's

0:06:14.279 --> 0:06:18.280
<v Speaker 1>also easier for to raise funding. So that's how you

0:06:18.400 --> 0:06:20.520
<v Speaker 1>end up with so many subsidiaries. And in terms of

0:06:20.560 --> 0:06:24.640
<v Speaker 1>the related party transactions, even in a normal course of business.

0:06:24.680 --> 0:06:29.400
<v Speaker 1>So for example, Doney Green Energy sells power to a

0:06:29.480 --> 0:06:33.719
<v Speaker 1>Doney Electricity Mumbai, which distributes it in Mumbai. That's in

0:06:33.760 --> 0:06:36.440
<v Speaker 1>a normal course of business, so you'd kind of expect

0:06:36.520 --> 0:06:41.279
<v Speaker 1>this related party transactions. Where I guess we might have

0:06:41.480 --> 0:06:44.320
<v Speaker 1>some concern from a credit perspective is in terms of

0:06:44.600 --> 0:06:48.799
<v Speaker 1>related party loans. And what we've seen there, for example,

0:06:48.920 --> 0:06:51.320
<v Speaker 1>is a Doney Ports. It does have this line item

0:06:51.360 --> 0:06:56.279
<v Speaker 1>called intercorporate deposits, which is made to unrelated parties, but

0:06:56.520 --> 0:07:01.200
<v Speaker 1>it's guaranteed by a related party. So these sort of transactions,

0:07:01.200 --> 0:07:04.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, without more explanation from a business perspective, could

0:07:04.680 --> 0:07:08.480
<v Speaker 1>seem a bit unusual. It's been about two months, maybe

0:07:08.520 --> 0:07:12.640
<v Speaker 1>a little more since Hindenberg Research issued its initial report

0:07:12.840 --> 0:07:17.000
<v Speaker 1>on a Donnie, How would you assess the way management

0:07:17.040 --> 0:07:19.320
<v Speaker 1>has handled the crisis so far and the amount of

0:07:19.400 --> 0:07:22.800
<v Speaker 1>damage the reporter is done. Yeah, sure tough. So from

0:07:22.840 --> 0:07:26.080
<v Speaker 1>a credit market perspective, I would say the company is

0:07:26.400 --> 0:07:29.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, they did issue a rebuttal very quickly, and

0:07:30.000 --> 0:07:32.880
<v Speaker 1>they have lined up obviously a series of calls for

0:07:32.920 --> 0:07:36.000
<v Speaker 1>their key dollarbone issuers and they are currently on the

0:07:36.040 --> 0:07:39.360
<v Speaker 1>road as we speak, you know, meeting investors. So they

0:07:39.400 --> 0:07:42.400
<v Speaker 1>are trying. But from a transparent se perspective, we do

0:07:42.440 --> 0:07:46.360
<v Speaker 1>believe there are still some information that that is missing.

0:07:46.600 --> 0:07:50.680
<v Speaker 1>So for example, they've provided that maturity profile for all

0:07:50.720 --> 0:07:53.800
<v Speaker 1>the key listed companies, but as as we've come to

0:07:53.800 --> 0:07:57.560
<v Speaker 1>find out, they are also promoted level debt and there's

0:07:57.800 --> 0:08:01.600
<v Speaker 1>very little information on debt, and there's always concerned that

0:08:01.640 --> 0:08:04.640
<v Speaker 1>when these matures would there be cash leakage from some

0:08:04.720 --> 0:08:08.240
<v Speaker 1>of its operating companies to help support the promoter. So

0:08:08.400 --> 0:08:11.120
<v Speaker 1>I would say that they've done some of it, but

0:08:11.360 --> 0:08:15.240
<v Speaker 1>there are still questions unanswered. Do you think in this case,

0:08:15.520 --> 0:08:19.400
<v Speaker 1>Adani's management has done enough to win back the confidence

0:08:19.440 --> 0:08:21.960
<v Speaker 1>of foreign investors or is there more work to do

0:08:22.560 --> 0:08:25.000
<v Speaker 1>as part of investing in emerging markers. I would say

0:08:25.040 --> 0:08:29.320
<v Speaker 1>that investors do understand that there are risks involved and

0:08:29.360 --> 0:08:32.240
<v Speaker 1>you price it in. But given just how high profile

0:08:32.280 --> 0:08:35.040
<v Speaker 1>this has could become, I do think, you know, there

0:08:35.080 --> 0:08:37.400
<v Speaker 1>needs to be some clarity and maybe cleaning up of

0:08:37.440 --> 0:08:41.320
<v Speaker 1>some of the issues around their shareholding structure and around

0:08:41.400 --> 0:08:46.280
<v Speaker 1>related party transactions. What about the auditing? The Hindenberg Research

0:08:46.320 --> 0:08:50.280
<v Speaker 1>report shed light on a little known auditing firm with

0:08:50.720 --> 0:08:53.960
<v Speaker 1>less than I think fifteen employees. They also mentioned that

0:08:54.000 --> 0:08:57.520
<v Speaker 1>the auditors at the time were less than twenty five

0:08:57.559 --> 0:09:00.320
<v Speaker 1>years old, but they signed off on the accounts. Has

0:09:00.440 --> 0:09:04.160
<v Speaker 1>a Danney Group allayed some of these fees? Um? So

0:09:05.360 --> 0:09:09.880
<v Speaker 1>I haven't heard anything. And you know, for the companies

0:09:09.920 --> 0:09:12.520
<v Speaker 1>that we do cover, so they're bigger companies that are

0:09:12.520 --> 0:09:16.120
<v Speaker 1>dollar bone issues, they are audited by you know, well

0:09:16.120 --> 0:09:20.719
<v Speaker 1>known typically big four audit firms. So this auditor that

0:09:21.240 --> 0:09:23.960
<v Speaker 1>the Hinden Word Research report refers to is specifically for

0:09:24.040 --> 0:09:29.480
<v Speaker 1>Adani Total Guests and also the holding company financial statements,

0:09:29.520 --> 0:09:32.280
<v Speaker 1>So the parent financial statements for Adanney Enterprises, although a

0:09:32.480 --> 0:09:37.840
<v Speaker 1>Danny Enterprises subsidiaries are audited by better known firms. So

0:09:38.120 --> 0:09:40.679
<v Speaker 1>I haven't heard anything in terms of you know, what

0:09:40.720 --> 0:09:43.800
<v Speaker 1>the company is going to do to address this. But um,

0:09:44.320 --> 0:09:46.199
<v Speaker 1>you know, for the other companies that we cover, it's

0:09:46.240 --> 0:09:49.720
<v Speaker 1>not as major an issue now as far as Adanni

0:09:49.800 --> 0:09:51.880
<v Speaker 1>Group is concerned and talk about bout the size and

0:09:51.880 --> 0:09:54.400
<v Speaker 1>the quality of the auditors. I think quality of auditors

0:09:54.520 --> 0:09:57.640
<v Speaker 1>is important, but I think one can't based conclusion on

0:09:57.679 --> 0:10:00.200
<v Speaker 1>the size of the firm alone, because if it's think

0:10:00.240 --> 0:10:03.079
<v Speaker 1>about it, many of the accounting scandals in the past

0:10:03.120 --> 0:10:06.720
<v Speaker 1>beat and Ron are more recently wild card regulators or

0:10:06.720 --> 0:10:11.440
<v Speaker 1>investors have blamed auditors for failure on their part, and

0:10:11.559 --> 0:10:15.439
<v Speaker 1>these are all big accounting firms. So having large auditor

0:10:15.559 --> 0:10:19.480
<v Speaker 1>may help companies to signal good corporate garnance to investors,

0:10:19.480 --> 0:10:24.040
<v Speaker 1>but not having one shouldn't imply lack of governance. You're

0:10:24.120 --> 0:10:26.920
<v Speaker 1>listening to Asia Centric. By the way, If you like

0:10:27.000 --> 0:10:30.480
<v Speaker 1>what you're hearing, please subscribe or give us a rating.

0:10:30.679 --> 0:10:34.600
<v Speaker 1>More stars are better. It helps other listeners find our

0:10:34.679 --> 0:10:40.280
<v Speaker 1>podcast and improves our visibility. Charon Chen many in the

0:10:40.320 --> 0:10:44.079
<v Speaker 1>Financial Commentary and have likened the Adani drama as Indians

0:10:44.160 --> 0:10:48.640
<v Speaker 1>quote en Ron moment or its Leman moments, echoing two

0:10:48.640 --> 0:10:51.080
<v Speaker 1>of the biggest corporate failures in the US of the

0:10:51.120 --> 0:10:53.839
<v Speaker 1>past twenty years. Do you think those are fair comparisons?

0:10:54.679 --> 0:10:57.600
<v Speaker 1>Not at this stage, given that you know, nothing is

0:10:57.640 --> 0:11:01.880
<v Speaker 1>proven yet, right. Um. The other thing is also like

0:11:01.960 --> 0:11:05.720
<v Speaker 1>going back, you know, to the contagion risk. I would

0:11:05.720 --> 0:11:08.920
<v Speaker 1>say even in the debt market, this is being viewed

0:11:08.960 --> 0:11:13.000
<v Speaker 1>in isolation in terms of a Doney specific bonds being

0:11:13.040 --> 0:11:16.640
<v Speaker 1>sold off, but not so much other Indian bonds because

0:11:17.000 --> 0:11:20.400
<v Speaker 1>ultimately this is a private group and so you know,

0:11:20.679 --> 0:11:24.120
<v Speaker 1>um so for example, those that have similar sort of

0:11:24.200 --> 0:11:29.800
<v Speaker 1>risk profile with a conglomerate issue or high promoter share pledges,

0:11:30.200 --> 0:11:32.599
<v Speaker 1>those have suffered. So for example of a Danta is

0:11:32.640 --> 0:11:36.600
<v Speaker 1>one of them. Um. But companies that have strong sponsors

0:11:36.640 --> 0:11:40.800
<v Speaker 1>and you know, are managing their debt profile correctly and

0:11:41.559 --> 0:11:44.640
<v Speaker 1>governance isn't as much of a risk have held in.

0:11:45.320 --> 0:11:47.800
<v Speaker 1>Does a Doney group have enough liquidity in cash to

0:11:47.880 --> 0:11:51.840
<v Speaker 1>meet the debt obligations and for how long as well? Um,

0:11:52.640 --> 0:11:57.280
<v Speaker 1>I do think that immediate liquidity so dissars liquidity is

0:11:57.760 --> 0:12:00.640
<v Speaker 1>not a concern because the amounts maturing, at least from

0:12:00.679 --> 0:12:02.800
<v Speaker 1>what we can tell in their key listed companies are

0:12:02.840 --> 0:12:07.280
<v Speaker 1>not large. And I've mentioned that you know, again the

0:12:07.840 --> 0:12:12.520
<v Speaker 1>companies invest in strong assets that are cash generatives, so

0:12:13.080 --> 0:12:16.239
<v Speaker 1>you would think that if they can offer these as collateral,

0:12:16.600 --> 0:12:20.079
<v Speaker 1>they should be able to raise the required funds. Where

0:12:20.160 --> 0:12:24.760
<v Speaker 1>we see some risk is mainly coming from refinancing as

0:12:24.760 --> 0:12:27.840
<v Speaker 1>we hit into twenty twenty four, and that's mainly in

0:12:27.880 --> 0:12:31.000
<v Speaker 1>a dining green energy. So the renewable company has one

0:12:31.000 --> 0:12:34.800
<v Speaker 1>point two five billion dollars worth of bonds coming due

0:12:34.840 --> 0:12:40.440
<v Speaker 1>next year and management has said that they're working on

0:12:40.520 --> 0:12:43.600
<v Speaker 1>lining up refinancing as we speak and they expect these

0:12:43.640 --> 0:12:46.920
<v Speaker 1>to be in place by the end of June. Having

0:12:46.920 --> 0:12:49.280
<v Speaker 1>said that, one of the bonds, worth seven hundred and

0:12:49.280 --> 0:12:52.440
<v Speaker 1>fifty million, is an unsecured bond as an it's not

0:12:52.520 --> 0:12:55.120
<v Speaker 1>pledged by project assets, so that's where we see the

0:12:55.559 --> 0:12:59.839
<v Speaker 1>higher risk. On top of that, according to Bloomberg data,

0:13:00.480 --> 0:13:04.480
<v Speaker 1>we see there's about four billion dollars of debt which

0:13:04.559 --> 0:13:06.920
<v Speaker 1>was used to fund the acquisition of Ambuja Cements and

0:13:07.040 --> 0:13:12.080
<v Speaker 1>acc which they also come due next year. So that's

0:13:12.120 --> 0:13:15.720
<v Speaker 1>that's a pretty large amount that needs to be refinders.

0:13:15.760 --> 0:13:18.679
<v Speaker 1>But you know, obviously these cement companies are good assets

0:13:18.679 --> 0:13:23.360
<v Speaker 1>and Ambujah in particular has a cash position. Nittan Adani

0:13:23.440 --> 0:13:26.719
<v Speaker 1>Group responded to the Hindenburg allegations saying that this was

0:13:26.760 --> 0:13:30.040
<v Speaker 1>an attack on India. Do you see this as an

0:13:30.040 --> 0:13:32.120
<v Speaker 1>attack on the country or do you think this is

0:13:32.120 --> 0:13:35.000
<v Speaker 1>more of an isolated issue. I think it's more of

0:13:35.040 --> 0:13:37.880
<v Speaker 1>an isolated issue, and probably like it's a key learning

0:13:37.880 --> 0:13:40.960
<v Speaker 1>for other companies not to respond in such a nationalistic

0:13:41.200 --> 0:13:45.559
<v Speaker 1>way when a governance issues come up, because like if

0:13:45.640 --> 0:13:49.320
<v Speaker 1>if they had like responded to their allegations in a

0:13:49.320 --> 0:13:53.120
<v Speaker 1>more structured manner rather than bringing nationalism into the equation,

0:13:54.040 --> 0:13:57.000
<v Speaker 1>maybe the scenario would have been different. So, like, because

0:13:57.160 --> 0:13:59.960
<v Speaker 1>Dani is not India and India is not adanis Indian

0:14:00.120 --> 0:14:03.400
<v Speaker 1>still seems to be a worldlike country by foreign investors

0:14:03.520 --> 0:14:07.280
<v Speaker 1>amongst emerging markets. Do you think foreign investors see India

0:14:07.360 --> 0:14:12.600
<v Speaker 1>as an alternative to investing in China given the geopolitical risks. Yeah,

0:14:12.600 --> 0:14:14.800
<v Speaker 1>I think we can look at the data to answer it.

0:14:15.280 --> 0:14:17.320
<v Speaker 1>First of all, if you look at the nature of

0:14:17.360 --> 0:14:21.440
<v Speaker 1>the both the asset classes China and Indian equities, they

0:14:21.440 --> 0:14:24.320
<v Speaker 1>are both high beta assets. Now what this means is

0:14:24.560 --> 0:14:27.840
<v Speaker 1>if global markets are a X person, these two will

0:14:27.880 --> 0:14:30.360
<v Speaker 1>go up one point two X and if the market

0:14:30.480 --> 0:14:33.520
<v Speaker 1>is down X person, they will go down one point

0:14:33.560 --> 0:14:37.320
<v Speaker 1>two X. Now, what this also means is any rational

0:14:37.400 --> 0:14:40.600
<v Speaker 1>global investor should put extra dollars in these two markets

0:14:40.640 --> 0:14:43.600
<v Speaker 1>together when he expects a risk on environment, and we'll

0:14:43.640 --> 0:14:46.520
<v Speaker 1>pull out money from both the markets at the same

0:14:46.560 --> 0:14:50.160
<v Speaker 1>time when he expects a risk of environment. Now that's

0:14:50.200 --> 0:14:53.280
<v Speaker 1>a rationality argument, But then the question is our global

0:14:53.320 --> 0:14:56.280
<v Speaker 1>investors actually rational? Now we can look at the foreign

0:14:56.280 --> 0:14:59.120
<v Speaker 1>flows for these two markets, and what we see there

0:14:59.240 --> 0:15:03.400
<v Speaker 1>is tronically foreign flows to India and China equities do

0:15:03.520 --> 0:15:08.200
<v Speaker 1>show significant positive correlation. This means that global investors are

0:15:08.240 --> 0:15:11.040
<v Speaker 1>investing in these two markets and pulling out money at

0:15:11.040 --> 0:15:13.600
<v Speaker 1>the same time. Now, if we talk about the last

0:15:13.640 --> 0:15:17.360
<v Speaker 1>two years geopolitical risk for Chinese equities, going by the

0:15:17.480 --> 0:15:20.880
<v Speaker 1>usual narrative, you would have expected negative foreign flows to

0:15:20.960 --> 0:15:24.120
<v Speaker 1>Chinese equities and positive flows to Indian equities, but that

0:15:24.280 --> 0:15:28.800
<v Speaker 1>hasn't happened. Actually, aggregate flows in the last two years

0:15:28.840 --> 0:15:32.000
<v Speaker 1>for the Chinese equities was positive and negative for the

0:15:32.040 --> 0:15:36.480
<v Speaker 1>Indian equities. So maybe this narrative India versus China holds

0:15:36.520 --> 0:15:40.840
<v Speaker 1>for business investments, but it's not true for portfolio decisions,

0:15:40.880 --> 0:15:43.560
<v Speaker 1>at least not for now. We've talked a lot about

0:15:43.600 --> 0:15:47.280
<v Speaker 1>the negative news surrounding Hindenburg Report. Let's talk about some

0:15:47.320 --> 0:15:50.000
<v Speaker 1>of the positives. There are some real value in some

0:15:50.040 --> 0:15:54.560
<v Speaker 1>of these companies, right, yes, certainly, I would say pretty

0:15:54.640 --> 0:15:56.640
<v Speaker 1>much all the companies. I mean, if you look at

0:15:56.680 --> 0:16:01.000
<v Speaker 1>the sectors that Attorney invest in, their primary really infrastructure.

0:16:01.040 --> 0:16:05.360
<v Speaker 1>So we're talking about ports, airports, you know, power transmission lines,

0:16:05.440 --> 0:16:12.000
<v Speaker 1>to distributions, renewable energy projects. These are all typically very stable,

0:16:12.280 --> 0:16:15.320
<v Speaker 1>long term assets. And you know, over the years we've

0:16:15.320 --> 0:16:20.280
<v Speaker 1>seen increasing um investor appetite to invest in these types

0:16:20.320 --> 0:16:25.120
<v Speaker 1>of infrastructure assets. Taking aside the corporate governance issues, Adneys

0:16:26.120 --> 0:16:29.800
<v Speaker 1>an actual business, you know, in terms of their operations,

0:16:30.080 --> 0:16:33.240
<v Speaker 1>is actually well known to be very well run, you know, um.

0:16:33.520 --> 0:16:36.120
<v Speaker 1>So for example, in ports, Adney Ports is basically the

0:16:36.120 --> 0:16:40.480
<v Speaker 1>group's crown jewel and it's Mundra Port is basically the

0:16:40.520 --> 0:16:45.280
<v Speaker 1>biggest port in India, and like Nittin suggested, Doney Ports

0:16:45.400 --> 0:16:49.440
<v Speaker 1>is the market leader there and it has been gaining

0:16:49.520 --> 0:16:52.440
<v Speaker 1>market share because it's well operated. So you know, the

0:16:52.440 --> 0:16:55.000
<v Speaker 1>shipping companies, the shipping lines want to stop there because

0:16:55.040 --> 0:16:57.440
<v Speaker 1>it's more efficient. Is the company has been investing in

0:16:57.520 --> 0:17:01.160
<v Speaker 1>logistics as well, so that it takes less time and

0:17:01.280 --> 0:17:07.040
<v Speaker 1>costs for these companies to transport their cargo. So you know,

0:17:07.280 --> 0:17:09.679
<v Speaker 1>there's definitely a positive in terms of how they've invested

0:17:09.720 --> 0:17:12.840
<v Speaker 1>in infrastructure side. It's just that unfortunately they have used

0:17:12.880 --> 0:17:15.440
<v Speaker 1>quite a lot of debt to fund some of its expansion.

0:17:15.960 --> 0:17:18.520
<v Speaker 1>So for they like they have played a very pivotal

0:17:18.680 --> 0:17:22.720
<v Speaker 1>role in like bridging the infrastructure gap. And we also

0:17:22.760 --> 0:17:27.719
<v Speaker 1>analyze like investing on infrastructure basically leads to um like

0:17:28.240 --> 0:17:31.240
<v Speaker 1>almost two to three times growth in GDP over the

0:17:31.320 --> 0:17:34.280
<v Speaker 1>long runs. And India is an infrastructure deficit country, so

0:17:35.160 --> 0:17:39.240
<v Speaker 1>it is an important part of the Holy ecosystem. NITT

0:17:39.359 --> 0:17:42.760
<v Speaker 1>and how is the Atani group viewed in India? Give

0:17:42.840 --> 0:17:48.000
<v Speaker 1>us the insider's view. It's difficult to comment. I was

0:17:48.000 --> 0:17:51.640
<v Speaker 1>reading a report basically, like if you visit Goat, which

0:17:51.680 --> 0:17:55.040
<v Speaker 1>is the hometown of Adani, and like you will see

0:17:55.119 --> 0:17:58.240
<v Speaker 1>a lot of holdings, a lot of advertisement, and a

0:17:58.240 --> 0:18:00.320
<v Speaker 1>lot of work that he has done for the date

0:18:00.400 --> 0:18:02.720
<v Speaker 1>as such, and he has given a lot of employment

0:18:02.800 --> 0:18:06.080
<v Speaker 1>to basically the people who have benefited out of him

0:18:06.359 --> 0:18:10.320
<v Speaker 1>definitely acknowledge and respect him. But on the other hand,

0:18:10.400 --> 0:18:14.240
<v Speaker 1>there is another group, for example, like the Onshore Funds

0:18:14.640 --> 0:18:18.840
<v Speaker 1>or basically retail investors which were not comfortable probably and

0:18:19.000 --> 0:18:22.760
<v Speaker 1>never invested in those shares. So it is like it's

0:18:22.880 --> 0:18:26.600
<v Speaker 1>kind of a dichotomous view. Some people respect him, some

0:18:26.680 --> 0:18:31.760
<v Speaker 1>people probably like do not and try to Like there's

0:18:31.760 --> 0:18:34.359
<v Speaker 1>been a lot of press reports talking about the close

0:18:34.480 --> 0:18:39.000
<v Speaker 1>relationship between Attani and the Modi government. Given what's happened

0:18:39.000 --> 0:18:41.840
<v Speaker 1>with the Hindenburg report and the debacle, do you think

0:18:41.880 --> 0:18:44.360
<v Speaker 1>it's going to be more difficult for Attani to win

0:18:44.480 --> 0:18:48.399
<v Speaker 1>more government orders. I think it's quite difficult to comment

0:18:48.480 --> 0:18:51.639
<v Speaker 1>at this point of time whether they will win more contracts,

0:18:51.920 --> 0:18:55.920
<v Speaker 1>but definitely, as I mentioned, like, they will definitely need

0:18:55.960 --> 0:18:58.760
<v Speaker 1>to slow down their revenue growth and pay down the

0:18:58.840 --> 0:19:02.680
<v Speaker 1>KPEX plans like currently they of late, they have come

0:19:02.680 --> 0:19:07.040
<v Speaker 1>out with a slowdown in KPEX announcements in several of

0:19:07.040 --> 0:19:10.160
<v Speaker 1>their forms. So basically, if the KPEX plans slow down,

0:19:10.520 --> 0:19:13.080
<v Speaker 1>then naturally the other government contracts will go to some

0:19:13.119 --> 0:19:17.560
<v Speaker 1>other party. But it's difficult to comment like any future

0:19:18.440 --> 0:19:21.359
<v Speaker 1>government contracts will be awarded them or not, but it

0:19:21.440 --> 0:19:24.080
<v Speaker 1>will be politically sensitive, like at this point of time

0:19:24.119 --> 0:19:26.840
<v Speaker 1>to just go and award another contract to them when

0:19:26.880 --> 0:19:30.159
<v Speaker 1>this news is ongoing. We've been talking a lot about

0:19:30.359 --> 0:19:35.040
<v Speaker 1>Adanni Group's woes and the dustop focused on the Hindenburg report.

0:19:35.480 --> 0:19:37.159
<v Speaker 1>Let's take a look on the bright side to what

0:19:37.280 --> 0:19:42.560
<v Speaker 1>extent has this controversy, all this scrutiny been good for

0:19:42.680 --> 0:19:47.200
<v Speaker 1>a Donnie and good for India. I think it's hard

0:19:47.240 --> 0:19:51.880
<v Speaker 1>to say what's been good for Adani other than perhaps

0:19:51.920 --> 0:19:55.520
<v Speaker 1>good for an investor in Adani is that transparency has

0:19:55.560 --> 0:19:59.320
<v Speaker 1>actually improved for the group as a whole. So for example,

0:19:59.400 --> 0:20:03.119
<v Speaker 1>the company disclosed the debt maturity for profile, the annual

0:20:03.119 --> 0:20:07.280
<v Speaker 1>debt maturity profile for all its key listed companies. You know,

0:20:07.320 --> 0:20:11.520
<v Speaker 1>the company has been doing investor meetings and we've made

0:20:11.560 --> 0:20:15.680
<v Speaker 1>themselves more available generally to investors. So I think that

0:20:15.760 --> 0:20:19.119
<v Speaker 1>would probably be the good thing. And also in the

0:20:19.160 --> 0:20:22.240
<v Speaker 1>past has obviously been talks about scrutiny and Adani growing

0:20:22.280 --> 0:20:25.320
<v Speaker 1>too rapidly and a lot of that being debt funded

0:20:25.359 --> 0:20:28.440
<v Speaker 1>at least, you know, for example, in the renewable energy

0:20:28.600 --> 0:20:32.000
<v Speaker 1>with the acquisition of the cement companies. So what we've

0:20:32.000 --> 0:20:35.480
<v Speaker 1>seen also is the company is dialing back some of

0:20:35.560 --> 0:20:39.240
<v Speaker 1>their growth ambitions at least in the near term. If

0:20:39.600 --> 0:20:42.280
<v Speaker 1>allegations do indeed come out to be true, then they

0:20:42.359 --> 0:20:47.239
<v Speaker 1>could lead to better regulatory norms and better shareholding disclosures

0:20:47.280 --> 0:20:50.080
<v Speaker 1>and those kinds of things. So so it will be

0:20:50.119 --> 0:20:52.480
<v Speaker 1>in the long run good for corporating India as well

0:20:53.200 --> 0:20:58.480
<v Speaker 1>and good for financial markets as well. Well. The Adani

0:20:58.560 --> 0:21:01.520
<v Speaker 1>Group drama is still unfolding. I'm sure we're going to

0:21:01.600 --> 0:21:03.480
<v Speaker 1>hear a lot more about it in the weeks of

0:21:03.560 --> 0:21:07.520
<v Speaker 1>the months to come. Kumar Galtam, Sharon Chen and Nitten

0:21:07.640 --> 0:21:11.160
<v Speaker 1>Chanduka all from Singapore. It's been a pleasure having you

0:21:11.280 --> 0:21:14.800
<v Speaker 1>on asia Centric. Thanks for having us, Thanks for having

0:21:14.840 --> 0:21:19.440
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for having us. Asia Centric is edited by Clara Chen.

0:21:19.800 --> 0:21:23.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm Tom Corbett in Hong Kong and I'm John Lee,

0:21:23.080 --> 0:21:25.360
<v Speaker 1>and you've been listening to asia Centric podcast.