WEBVTT - Apple WWDC Recap, Musk and OpenAI

0:00:01.520 --> 0:00:05.200
<v Speaker 1>From Mahard where Innovation of Money and Power Collie in

0:00:05.320 --> 0:00:06.800
<v Speaker 1>Silicon Valley, NBN.

0:00:07.160 --> 0:00:11.160
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg Technology with Caroline Hyde and Ed Ludlow.

0:00:24.600 --> 0:00:26.960
<v Speaker 3>I'm Caroine Heidel, Bloomberg's world headquarters in New York, and

0:00:27.000 --> 0:00:27.960
<v Speaker 3>Ludlow He's off.

0:00:28.240 --> 0:00:29.440
<v Speaker 4>This is Bloomberg Technology.

0:00:29.600 --> 0:00:32.600
<v Speaker 3>Coming up, will bring you the full recap from Apple's

0:00:32.640 --> 0:00:36.360
<v Speaker 3>annual Developers Conference as shares rise to a record following

0:00:36.400 --> 0:00:37.200
<v Speaker 3>the company's event.

0:00:37.800 --> 0:00:40.000
<v Speaker 4>Plus will break down comments from Elon Muskers.

0:00:40.040 --> 0:00:42.800
<v Speaker 3>He says he would ban Apple devices from his companies

0:00:43.120 --> 0:00:47.000
<v Speaker 3>if open ai is integrated into the operating system and

0:00:47.200 --> 0:00:51.519
<v Speaker 3>troubled French IT firm atos it picks a winner for

0:00:51.600 --> 0:00:54.520
<v Speaker 3>its bailout. We'll discuss that and the state of French

0:00:54.600 --> 0:00:57.600
<v Speaker 3>tech and so much more throughout this hour. First, let's

0:00:57.640 --> 0:00:59.720
<v Speaker 3>check in on the French markets. Let's check in on

0:00:59.800 --> 0:01:02.200
<v Speaker 3>the macro perspective. More broadly, look a little bit of

0:01:02.240 --> 0:01:05.080
<v Speaker 3>anxiety as we run towards the federal reserve that CPI print,

0:01:05.240 --> 0:01:07.759
<v Speaker 3>but more broadly managing to see tech once again on top.

0:01:07.800 --> 0:01:09.479
<v Speaker 4>Thanks to Apple. Of course, We're up.

0:01:09.360 --> 0:01:11.440
<v Speaker 3>Two tenser percent on the NASDAK the cap forty, though

0:01:11.440 --> 0:01:14.600
<v Speaker 3>having a woe full time in France, political risk, some anxiety,

0:01:14.720 --> 0:01:18.720
<v Speaker 3>some rumors swirling that perhaps even Macron could step down

0:01:18.720 --> 0:01:21.400
<v Speaker 3>if indeed that legislative vote that he has just called

0:01:21.680 --> 0:01:24.880
<v Speaker 3>doesn't go his way, but that has been suppressed and

0:01:24.920 --> 0:01:26.479
<v Speaker 3>denied by people close to him. But it was still

0:01:26.520 --> 0:01:27.960
<v Speaker 3>off by one and a quarter percent in France. We

0:01:28.080 --> 0:01:30.959
<v Speaker 3>go to some interesting fundraising and news coming from France.

0:01:31.000 --> 0:01:33.360
<v Speaker 3>A little bit later in the show, Crypto is under pressure,

0:01:33.360 --> 0:01:36.360
<v Speaker 3>off by almost four percent. Interesting correlations. Basically, when bonds

0:01:36.360 --> 0:01:39.520
<v Speaker 3>sell off, so does bitcoin, and bonds are selling off today,

0:01:39.600 --> 0:01:41.800
<v Speaker 3>Crypto off by some four percent. As we head towards

0:01:41.840 --> 0:01:43.679
<v Speaker 3>those macro events, move on and have a look at

0:01:43.720 --> 0:01:46.679
<v Speaker 3>what's happening on individual movers, and I'm only singling out one.

0:01:46.880 --> 0:01:50.080
<v Speaker 3>I'm looking at Apple rising to yet a new record high.

0:01:50.080 --> 0:01:52.760
<v Speaker 3>We're now up more than five percent. I thought yesterday

0:01:52.800 --> 0:01:55.640
<v Speaker 3>we were a little bit like un or inspired by

0:01:55.640 --> 0:02:00.080
<v Speaker 3>some of the announcements coming from WWDC, but seemingly we

0:02:00.120 --> 0:02:00.920
<v Speaker 3>are now thinking this.

0:02:00.960 --> 0:02:03.400
<v Speaker 4>Will drive the purchases of new phones.

0:02:03.160 --> 0:02:05.760
<v Speaker 3>That stick with IT shares as we hit this record.

0:02:05.960 --> 0:02:08.640
<v Speaker 3>We want to delve into the AI announcements, some of

0:02:08.680 --> 0:02:11.320
<v Speaker 3>it mixed, but one tech Titan has a pretty hot take,

0:02:11.600 --> 0:02:14.320
<v Speaker 3>you know, Musk saying he'd ban Apple devices from his

0:02:14.400 --> 0:02:18.400
<v Speaker 3>companies if open AI's artificial intelligence software is integrated as

0:02:18.400 --> 0:02:21.760
<v Speaker 3>the operating system level, calling the tie up security risk.

0:02:22.040 --> 0:02:23.280
<v Speaker 4>We want to get into the announcements.

0:02:23.280 --> 0:02:26.240
<v Speaker 3>We want to get into Elon Musk's take, Bloomberg, Mark

0:02:26.240 --> 0:02:28.679
<v Speaker 3>German here with the AI breakdown. Kert Wagner, of course,

0:02:28.720 --> 0:02:31.000
<v Speaker 3>an author on all things Elon and Mark.

0:02:31.040 --> 0:02:34.600
<v Speaker 4>I want to start with you because surmise the market reaction.

0:02:35.160 --> 0:02:37.720
<v Speaker 3>You thought perhaps some of it was a bit lackluster,

0:02:37.800 --> 0:02:39.680
<v Speaker 3>but the market seems be liking the fact that we.

0:02:39.639 --> 0:02:41.160
<v Speaker 4>Might buy some new iPhones on this.

0:02:41.600 --> 0:02:44.280
<v Speaker 5>I definitely don't think this is going to drive iphon

0:02:44.400 --> 0:02:48.040
<v Speaker 5>sixteen sales this fall in any significant way. I do

0:02:48.120 --> 0:02:50.799
<v Speaker 5>think that over time, this is going to seriously drive

0:02:50.880 --> 0:02:53.560
<v Speaker 5>sales of follow up iterations of the iPhone, maybe the

0:02:53.600 --> 0:02:55.280
<v Speaker 5>one after maybe the one after that, maybe the one

0:02:55.280 --> 0:02:56.120
<v Speaker 5>after that, and.

0:02:56.120 --> 0:02:58.560
<v Speaker 6>Well into the future. I do believe it's going to

0:02:58.680 --> 0:03:00.960
<v Speaker 6>enable a set of new generation of.

0:03:00.919 --> 0:03:05.799
<v Speaker 5>Apple devices, things like arglasses, home robots, enhanced air pods

0:03:05.880 --> 0:03:08.919
<v Speaker 5>with AI, and cameras. So this really sets the stage

0:03:08.960 --> 0:03:11.840
<v Speaker 5>for Apple's future. Now, the most important part here is

0:03:11.880 --> 0:03:14.200
<v Speaker 5>Apple no longer has to worry about the risk of

0:03:14.200 --> 0:03:17.639
<v Speaker 5>people switching away from the Apple ecosystem seeking a more

0:03:17.680 --> 0:03:22.440
<v Speaker 5>aiified phone. Apple now has the same functionality that Samsung has,

0:03:22.680 --> 0:03:25.000
<v Speaker 5>that Google has, that other players have in terms of

0:03:25.000 --> 0:03:28.799
<v Speaker 5>deep AI integration into its devices. So I think from

0:03:28.800 --> 0:03:31.480
<v Speaker 5>that standpoint, it's a positive and that's making the street

0:03:31.760 --> 0:03:34.560
<v Speaker 5>quite happy. I think they're digesting. There was a lot

0:03:34.560 --> 0:03:37.240
<v Speaker 5>of stuff on Monday at the Worldwide Developers Conference. I

0:03:37.240 --> 0:03:39.720
<v Speaker 5>think they've been going through what the Apple announcements were

0:03:39.960 --> 0:03:43.080
<v Speaker 5>and they see how comprehensive the set of tools that

0:03:43.120 --> 0:03:47.280
<v Speaker 5>Apple's offering here with a quintessential Apple spin with its

0:03:47.280 --> 0:03:50.160
<v Speaker 5>privacy standpoint and very deep integration.

0:03:51.040 --> 0:03:55.080
<v Speaker 3>Let's talk about privacy and integration KAT, because privacy has

0:03:55.120 --> 0:03:58.160
<v Speaker 3>been called into question by one Elon Musk because of

0:03:58.200 --> 0:04:02.000
<v Speaker 3>the integration with chat ChiPT and can you just keep

0:04:02.080 --> 0:04:04.440
<v Speaker 3>us up to speed with what Elon Musk is accusing here?

0:04:04.960 --> 0:04:07.920
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, Well, Elon is basically saying that if chat GPT

0:04:08.160 --> 0:04:11.040
<v Speaker 7>is infused at the operating system level of these phones,

0:04:11.120 --> 0:04:13.360
<v Speaker 7>that you know, it would have access to all of

0:04:13.400 --> 0:04:15.320
<v Speaker 7>the data on the phone, which would go to Apple

0:04:15.360 --> 0:04:17.760
<v Speaker 7>and then go to Open AI. What you have to remember,

0:04:17.800 --> 0:04:21.280
<v Speaker 7>of course, is that Elon has a lot of incentive

0:04:21.400 --> 0:04:25.240
<v Speaker 7>to you know, seed this idea that this is an

0:04:25.360 --> 0:04:29.920
<v Speaker 7>unsafe in a privacy issue because he is building a

0:04:30.000 --> 0:04:34.480
<v Speaker 7>direct competitor to chat GPT with his you know, Xai

0:04:34.600 --> 0:04:37.800
<v Speaker 7>business that's building grock its own chat pots. So I

0:04:37.839 --> 0:04:39.360
<v Speaker 7>do think that this is the kind of thing that

0:04:39.400 --> 0:04:42.560
<v Speaker 7>he is you know, incentivized to do, to to kind

0:04:42.560 --> 0:04:45.760
<v Speaker 7>of pour cold water on this partnership, to you know,

0:04:45.800 --> 0:04:48.800
<v Speaker 7>make people question or doubt whether or not this is

0:04:48.880 --> 0:04:52.200
<v Speaker 7>done above board, because he stands the benefit here with

0:04:52.320 --> 0:04:55.320
<v Speaker 7>his own business and his own companies building a rival product.

0:04:55.640 --> 0:04:57.880
<v Speaker 3>Well, Mark, apart from going to Tim Cook with this,

0:04:58.040 --> 0:04:59.760
<v Speaker 3>we go to you because I don't know anyone who

0:04:59.800 --> 0:05:01.640
<v Speaker 3>can out square us up on whether this is a

0:05:01.680 --> 0:05:04.279
<v Speaker 3>key privacy risk better than you could. Mark. What do

0:05:04.320 --> 0:05:06.320
<v Speaker 3>you make of some of the accusations and whether or

0:05:06.320 --> 0:05:09.480
<v Speaker 3>not this integration would open up any privacy concerns.

0:05:09.720 --> 0:05:11.960
<v Speaker 5>Well, first of all, I completely agree with Kurt right.

0:05:12.240 --> 0:05:14.839
<v Speaker 5>Elon Moss doesn't have the best of relationships with open

0:05:14.839 --> 0:05:17.200
<v Speaker 5>Ai and Tim Altman, for one, doesn't have the best

0:05:17.240 --> 0:05:18.880
<v Speaker 5>relationship with Apple and Tim Cook.

0:05:18.960 --> 0:05:21.880
<v Speaker 6>He's not a fan of their app store, policies. He's

0:05:21.920 --> 0:05:23.520
<v Speaker 6>building grock.

0:05:23.360 --> 0:05:26.440
<v Speaker 5>Right through his own XAI company, right it's integrated for

0:05:26.520 --> 0:05:29.400
<v Speaker 5>some users into the exapp right now, so he has

0:05:29.400 --> 0:05:31.479
<v Speaker 5>an incentive to sort of pour cold water and this

0:05:31.560 --> 0:05:34.720
<v Speaker 5>idea and raise skepticism. On the other hand, I do

0:05:34.800 --> 0:05:37.840
<v Speaker 5>believe there are some privacy questions here. I don't think

0:05:37.839 --> 0:05:41.000
<v Speaker 5>there's many questions about Apple's in house AI large language models.

0:05:41.040 --> 0:05:44.479
<v Speaker 6>I think they showed in great in great ways how.

0:05:44.320 --> 0:05:47.760
<v Speaker 5>Private they're on device AI is their own iCloud based

0:05:47.800 --> 0:05:51.000
<v Speaker 5>AI protection. But once you start working with a third party,

0:05:51.080 --> 0:05:54.240
<v Speaker 5>you're talking about servers that are powered by Microsoft Azure,

0:05:54.560 --> 0:05:58.440
<v Speaker 5>you're talking about technology that's powered by OpenAI. There isn't

0:05:58.600 --> 0:06:01.560
<v Speaker 5>a clearly explained way how Apple can verify the privacy

0:06:01.640 --> 0:06:04.840
<v Speaker 5>of your data that's input into chat GPT. In fact,

0:06:05.200 --> 0:06:07.840
<v Speaker 5>when you start moving from Apple's AI models on the

0:06:07.839 --> 0:06:10.480
<v Speaker 5>phone to the chat GPT models the phone, makes it

0:06:10.600 --> 0:06:12.960
<v Speaker 5>very clear that you're now in open AI territory.

0:06:13.200 --> 0:06:14.800
<v Speaker 6>Right, So, I think the biggest thing you're.

0:06:14.640 --> 0:06:17.040
<v Speaker 5>Doing right now is warning consumers that your data is

0:06:17.040 --> 0:06:18.839
<v Speaker 5>being input into a third party provider.

0:06:19.160 --> 0:06:22.320
<v Speaker 6>But they hadn't showed a way to verify the privacy.

0:06:21.839 --> 0:06:24.919
<v Speaker 5>Of that information However, Apple and OpenAI have said that

0:06:25.000 --> 0:06:27.280
<v Speaker 5>they are keeping that data that's input from the iPhone

0:06:27.360 --> 0:06:30.880
<v Speaker 5>especially private. They're not logging it, they're not creating data profiles.

0:06:31.160 --> 0:06:33.240
<v Speaker 5>But it is really the onus really is on open

0:06:33.240 --> 0:06:36.120
<v Speaker 5>Ai to verify that, and Apple to keep on top

0:06:36.160 --> 0:06:38.440
<v Speaker 5>of open Ai to make sure that they don't breach

0:06:38.480 --> 0:06:41.440
<v Speaker 5>any of those terms on the privacy side of that partnership,

0:06:41.600 --> 0:06:42.800
<v Speaker 5>which I honestly think they'll do.

0:06:43.720 --> 0:06:43.960
<v Speaker 1>Cut.

0:06:44.240 --> 0:06:47.880
<v Speaker 3>Maybe therefore there is some reason to the shouting that's

0:06:47.880 --> 0:06:48.960
<v Speaker 3>going on on social media.

0:06:49.000 --> 0:06:50.480
<v Speaker 4>Buy it on must but also cut. We're a bit

0:06:50.520 --> 0:06:53.040
<v Speaker 4>immune to it. We've had it on musks.

0:06:53.080 --> 0:06:57.159
<v Speaker 3>Throw some Bob comments via to Tim Cook in the past,

0:06:57.200 --> 0:06:59.200
<v Speaker 3>of course, about perhaps the way in which the app

0:06:59.200 --> 0:07:01.640
<v Speaker 3>store is run. Know that he's actually suing open Ai.

0:07:02.160 --> 0:07:04.000
<v Speaker 3>How likely do you think it is that he would

0:07:04.000 --> 0:07:06.640
<v Speaker 3>pad Apple iPhones across these six companies.

0:07:07.080 --> 0:07:09.880
<v Speaker 7>I mean, this is someone who, as we know Caroline

0:07:10.080 --> 0:07:13.320
<v Speaker 7>is not afraid of controversy and conflict and picking fights

0:07:13.360 --> 0:07:16.680
<v Speaker 7>with other very rich and powerful people, Tim Cook being one,

0:07:16.760 --> 0:07:19.320
<v Speaker 7>Sam Altman, Mark Zuckerberg, the list goes on and on.

0:07:19.400 --> 0:07:21.440
<v Speaker 7>So I do think it's the kind of thing that

0:07:21.680 --> 0:07:23.760
<v Speaker 7>you know he might do to try to prove a

0:07:23.800 --> 0:07:26.760
<v Speaker 7>point or to make a point. And you know, for him,

0:07:26.800 --> 0:07:29.960
<v Speaker 7>he's now even sort of hinting at, oh, maybe maybe

0:07:30.000 --> 0:07:33.320
<v Speaker 7>he would build his own phone someday, right, like maybe

0:07:33.320 --> 0:07:35.160
<v Speaker 7>he would partner with someone for a phone. I think

0:07:35.200 --> 0:07:37.800
<v Speaker 7>this is very Elon. It's on brand for him, right.

0:07:37.880 --> 0:07:40.760
<v Speaker 7>He sort of picks these fights. He does it very publicly.

0:07:40.840 --> 0:07:45.040
<v Speaker 7>He makes these grand claims or aspirations, and then you know,

0:07:45.040 --> 0:07:46.840
<v Speaker 7>when push comes to show, we'll see what he does.

0:07:46.880 --> 0:07:48.720
<v Speaker 7>But I don't think it's the kind of thing that

0:07:49.080 --> 0:07:51.360
<v Speaker 7>you know, for him, it's not a huge skin off

0:07:51.360 --> 0:07:53.480
<v Speaker 7>his back, right if it makes the point he's trying

0:07:53.480 --> 0:07:55.480
<v Speaker 7>to make. And I think, as Mark and I have

0:07:55.600 --> 0:07:58.280
<v Speaker 7>pointed out, that's the goal here, is to sort of

0:07:58.520 --> 0:08:01.320
<v Speaker 7>cast doubt on this whole partnership, to cast down on

0:08:01.360 --> 0:08:04.000
<v Speaker 7>these other companies that are considered rivals of his, and

0:08:04.040 --> 0:08:06.440
<v Speaker 7>to do so in a very public public way.

0:08:07.200 --> 0:08:10.160
<v Speaker 3>Well, he's got the public's attention for now, so too

0:08:10.280 --> 0:08:13.600
<v Speaker 3>does Apple. From WWDC, Mark German, great round, Loock Kirk

0:08:13.640 --> 0:08:18.440
<v Speaker 3>Wagner with all the insights on Elon's ink, we appreciate it. Meanwhile,

0:08:18.440 --> 0:08:20.120
<v Speaker 3>we've just got some breaking news. We'll keep you up

0:08:20.160 --> 0:08:23.800
<v Speaker 3>to date with what is currently happening. From a legal perspective,

0:08:23.880 --> 0:08:26.360
<v Speaker 3>Hunter Biden's jury tells the court that it hasn't eed

0:08:26.400 --> 0:08:29.960
<v Speaker 3>reached a verdict in the gun case regarding Hunter Biden.

0:08:30.000 --> 0:08:31.960
<v Speaker 3>We will bring you the updates as and when we

0:08:32.040 --> 0:08:34.720
<v Speaker 3>receive them. For now, though, we stick to our knitting,

0:08:34.760 --> 0:08:35.600
<v Speaker 3>which is technology.

0:08:35.640 --> 0:08:37.360
<v Speaker 4>On this show. Navilla popol is with US.

0:08:37.559 --> 0:08:40.360
<v Speaker 3>Senior research director with IDC to get her read on

0:08:40.400 --> 0:08:43.960
<v Speaker 3>yesterday's anounments at WWDC. And I think what the question

0:08:44.040 --> 0:08:46.880
<v Speaker 3>for me in many ways is why the market is

0:08:46.960 --> 0:08:49.840
<v Speaker 3>loving it so much when initially we thought there's no

0:08:49.920 --> 0:08:50.880
<v Speaker 3>wild factor here.

0:08:51.360 --> 0:08:54.520
<v Speaker 1>Hi, Calyne, thanks for having me. You know you're so

0:08:54.720 --> 0:08:57.319
<v Speaker 1>right because I've been like absorbing all this information as

0:08:57.360 --> 0:08:58.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure everyone else here.

0:08:59.280 --> 0:09:01.160
<v Speaker 6>I think it was really big, is you know?

0:09:01.280 --> 0:09:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Yesterday there might have been a lackluster response because, like

0:09:04.080 --> 0:09:07.120
<v Speaker 1>you said, there wasn't any brand new feature or use

0:09:07.200 --> 0:09:09.160
<v Speaker 1>case that we haven't seen yet right from the other

0:09:09.200 --> 0:09:11.959
<v Speaker 1>platforms or the other players in the market. But what

0:09:12.120 --> 0:09:14.320
<v Speaker 1>to me really stood I No, I think what's catching on.

0:09:14.760 --> 0:09:17.040
<v Speaker 1>You know, the wave here is this is a big,

0:09:17.280 --> 0:09:20.760
<v Speaker 1>big move. It's a bold, you know, step forward for Apple.

0:09:20.920 --> 0:09:23.480
<v Speaker 1>They Yes, sure they were you know, behind the curve

0:09:23.520 --> 0:09:25.160
<v Speaker 1>a little bit. But I think the way they've come

0:09:25.200 --> 0:09:28.079
<v Speaker 1>out right now, they've told you know, what Apple does best, right,

0:09:28.440 --> 0:09:32.360
<v Speaker 1>They've told a really compelling consumer story most consumers aren't

0:09:32.400 --> 0:09:34.800
<v Speaker 1>really aware about, you know, what's generated AI and what

0:09:34.840 --> 0:09:37.600
<v Speaker 1>it can do. What I think Apple did that, you know,

0:09:38.120 --> 0:09:39.920
<v Speaker 1>was his unius on their part is the way they

0:09:39.960 --> 0:09:44.000
<v Speaker 1>integrated it into the user experience, which is of course

0:09:44.040 --> 0:09:47.520
<v Speaker 1>central to Apple's you know history, and now it's always

0:09:47.520 --> 0:09:50.000
<v Speaker 1>been about the user experience, and it's about how bring

0:09:50.080 --> 0:09:53.880
<v Speaker 1>me an AI on device with everything that we do

0:09:53.960 --> 0:09:56.559
<v Speaker 1>right and everyday apps that we have without having to

0:09:56.720 --> 0:09:59.319
<v Speaker 1>go somewhere click on a different app or chatbot. It's

0:09:59.360 --> 0:10:02.680
<v Speaker 1>just everything integrated. And then of course there's strong message

0:10:02.720 --> 0:10:05.360
<v Speaker 1>on you know, if you do it with Apple Intelligence,

0:10:05.920 --> 0:10:07.560
<v Speaker 1>it's going to be private and secure.

0:10:07.760 --> 0:10:11.199
<v Speaker 3>But that privacy and security issue, do you think that

0:10:11.200 --> 0:10:12.959
<v Speaker 3>that's in any way You're going to be questioned by

0:10:12.960 --> 0:10:14.920
<v Speaker 3>what Musk is currently saying. Do you think it might

0:10:14.920 --> 0:10:17.199
<v Speaker 3>put off people going for the iPhone sixteen?

0:10:18.120 --> 0:10:21.400
<v Speaker 1>You know, you know, Elon Musk will be Elon Musk right,

0:10:21.520 --> 0:10:24.000
<v Speaker 1>like you just said in the earlier segment, there's definitely

0:10:24.080 --> 0:10:26.679
<v Speaker 1>going to be a lot of talk going that it's

0:10:26.679 --> 0:10:28.600
<v Speaker 1>going to be around this, but I think Apple's messaging

0:10:28.679 --> 0:10:31.640
<v Speaker 1>was clear right that if you using AI, the way

0:10:31.679 --> 0:10:34.240
<v Speaker 1>they have shown this and everything that they've shown yesterday

0:10:34.360 --> 0:10:37.240
<v Speaker 1>was it's going to give you a personalized, customized experience.

0:10:37.280 --> 0:10:40.600
<v Speaker 1>It's going to keep most of things on device. It's

0:10:40.600 --> 0:10:43.079
<v Speaker 1>only when you because that's where they're not using. I

0:10:43.080 --> 0:10:44.720
<v Speaker 1>think there's a lot of confusion, and I was like

0:10:44.760 --> 0:10:47.360
<v Speaker 1>looking into this myself earlier this morning. We have our

0:10:47.440 --> 0:10:50.720
<v Speaker 1>team on ground at Apple Park to verify, you know,

0:10:50.760 --> 0:10:53.160
<v Speaker 1>what is it the models that are being used in

0:10:53.200 --> 0:10:55.440
<v Speaker 1>all of Apple Intelligence and all the features that we

0:10:55.480 --> 0:10:58.120
<v Speaker 1>saw right, what are the different whether it's gen mojis,

0:10:58.120 --> 0:11:02.560
<v Speaker 1>whether it's the summarization, description, search, everything that's on device,

0:11:02.640 --> 0:11:06.320
<v Speaker 1>it's based on Apple's own AI models. It's only the chat,

0:11:06.400 --> 0:11:09.640
<v Speaker 1>GPT and open AI comes in when you're trying to

0:11:09.720 --> 0:11:12.000
<v Speaker 1>prompt Siri for a question that serie can't use the

0:11:12.040 --> 0:11:15.240
<v Speaker 1>information that's on your device to answer, or Apple's own

0:11:15.280 --> 0:11:18.080
<v Speaker 1>AI model, and that's the opt in feature which you're

0:11:18.120 --> 0:11:22.400
<v Speaker 1>gonna give you user or serie access or you know,

0:11:22.480 --> 0:11:25.000
<v Speaker 1>give your permission to access chat GBT.

0:11:25.320 --> 0:11:25.880
<v Speaker 4>So I think the.

0:11:25.840 --> 0:11:28.800
<v Speaker 1>Way they have messaged it is pretty clear that everything

0:11:28.840 --> 0:11:31.120
<v Speaker 1>that you do on the Apple device will be secure.

0:11:31.320 --> 0:11:34.079
<v Speaker 1>And even when Apple or the device can't use its

0:11:34.080 --> 0:11:36.679
<v Speaker 1>own you know, on device AI model, it's going to

0:11:36.800 --> 0:11:42.080
<v Speaker 1>use Apples Secure cloud uh to you know, personalized clouds

0:11:42.080 --> 0:11:46.120
<v Speaker 1>to to be able to run those more complicated AI models.

0:11:46.160 --> 0:11:47.760
<v Speaker 1>But Chat g I think.

0:11:47.600 --> 0:11:48.120
<v Speaker 4>It's it was.

0:11:48.200 --> 0:11:50.559
<v Speaker 1>It was very segmented in a different way that only

0:11:50.679 --> 0:11:52.800
<v Speaker 1>you know used during serie prompts NEVLA.

0:11:53.080 --> 0:11:55.480
<v Speaker 3>What's interesting is this is a global company with a

0:11:55.480 --> 0:11:57.760
<v Speaker 3>lot of focus on China, and I'm interested is to

0:11:57.840 --> 0:12:01.240
<v Speaker 3>longer term, you know that going to perhaps be more

0:12:01.320 --> 0:12:04.600
<v Speaker 3>agnostic about which large language model they use, adopt or

0:12:04.600 --> 0:12:05.640
<v Speaker 3>indeed build their own.

0:12:06.160 --> 0:12:08.600
<v Speaker 4>But can this go live in China? Will it stimulate

0:12:08.640 --> 0:12:09.439
<v Speaker 4>demand in China?

0:12:10.040 --> 0:12:11.720
<v Speaker 1>So the key you know, and again like we were

0:12:11.760 --> 0:12:14.080
<v Speaker 1>talking to our China team this morning, because Chat GBT

0:12:14.200 --> 0:12:17.160
<v Speaker 1>isn't available in China right now. With this iteration, you know,

0:12:17.240 --> 0:12:20.840
<v Speaker 1>it's not going to benefit the upgrade cycle in China

0:12:21.000 --> 0:12:24.160
<v Speaker 1>with the with the device this year. However, the fact

0:12:24.160 --> 0:12:26.760
<v Speaker 1>that Apple's in AI, the fact that Apple is doing

0:12:26.800 --> 0:12:30.079
<v Speaker 1>these things, it's going to benefit the consumer perception which

0:12:30.240 --> 0:12:32.600
<v Speaker 1>was taking you know, a negative turn, especially in China

0:12:32.640 --> 0:12:36.840
<v Speaker 1>because consumers are you know, placing AI as a driving

0:12:36.880 --> 0:12:40.000
<v Speaker 1>factor in their device is in terms of purchasing. So

0:12:40.440 --> 0:12:43.560
<v Speaker 1>I think this this year, the upgrade cycle will probably

0:12:43.600 --> 0:12:46.080
<v Speaker 1>be more impacted because as they said, it's going to

0:12:46.080 --> 0:12:48.200
<v Speaker 1>be available in the fall and only in supporting the

0:12:48.240 --> 0:12:52.079
<v Speaker 1>English language. So countries like US, UK or any consumers

0:12:52.120 --> 0:12:55.120
<v Speaker 1>that are primarily English driven, it's going to drive because

0:12:55.120 --> 0:12:57.200
<v Speaker 1>there's plenty of you know users out there with iPhone

0:12:57.240 --> 0:13:00.839
<v Speaker 1>eleven and iPhone twelve. Because the average first cycle we're

0:13:00.840 --> 0:13:03.080
<v Speaker 1>still looking at about three to four years, right, so there's

0:13:03.120 --> 0:13:05.600
<v Speaker 1>any of those users that will you know, want these

0:13:05.640 --> 0:13:07.760
<v Speaker 1>new devices, even if it's just English support.

0:13:08.360 --> 0:13:09.640
<v Speaker 6>I'm our English speaking.

0:13:09.360 --> 0:13:12.400
<v Speaker 4>User, Nobela keeping it global for us. We thank you

0:13:12.480 --> 0:13:12.880
<v Speaker 4>so much.

0:13:13.200 --> 0:13:25.760
<v Speaker 3>Nombilla Popel, thank you, Senior research director with IDC. French

0:13:25.800 --> 0:13:28.600
<v Speaker 3>AI startup misrab It's raised six hundred and forty four

0:13:28.600 --> 0:13:31.440
<v Speaker 3>million dollars in a new funding round that now values

0:13:31.480 --> 0:13:34.000
<v Speaker 3>the company at close to six billion euros. The round,

0:13:34.080 --> 0:13:36.280
<v Speaker 3>led by Bench Capital Firm and General Catalyst, give us

0:13:36.280 --> 0:13:39.160
<v Speaker 3>a company additional resources to take on bigger global players

0:13:39.200 --> 0:13:40.960
<v Speaker 3>such as of course open AI here in the US,

0:13:41.120 --> 0:13:44.439
<v Speaker 3>mister Roll is France's prized AI champion. It's attracted more

0:13:44.480 --> 0:13:48.480
<v Speaker 3>than one billion euros in investment in this last year alone. Meanwhile,

0:13:48.600 --> 0:13:51.040
<v Speaker 3>there's a less prize French company right now.

0:13:51.160 --> 0:13:53.199
<v Speaker 4>Oh, indeed, we do have some breaking news.

0:13:53.040 --> 0:13:55.240
<v Speaker 3>Coming from the US, So before we head back out

0:13:55.240 --> 0:13:56.960
<v Speaker 3>to France, I just want to have a look that

0:13:57.040 --> 0:14:00.760
<v Speaker 3>Hunter Biden hasn't even convicted of gun charger by a

0:14:00.840 --> 0:14:04.640
<v Speaker 3>jury in a Delaware trial. The jury took three hours

0:14:04.679 --> 0:14:07.400
<v Speaker 3>to reach a verdict against the President's son, and Hunter

0:14:07.440 --> 0:14:11.720
<v Speaker 3>Biden still faces a separate tax crime trial in California.

0:14:12.200 --> 0:14:14.320
<v Speaker 3>We now want to go out to Katie Lyons, who

0:14:14.320 --> 0:14:16.480
<v Speaker 3>has been standing by for us in Washington, and Kayley.

0:14:16.880 --> 0:14:19.400
<v Speaker 4>The impact of this could be significant.

0:14:19.400 --> 0:14:22.280
<v Speaker 8>Caroline Hunter Biden here found guilty of all three counts

0:14:22.320 --> 0:14:24.360
<v Speaker 8>with which he was charged. This is the first time

0:14:24.440 --> 0:14:27.440
<v Speaker 8>in history that a child of a sitting president has

0:14:27.480 --> 0:14:30.200
<v Speaker 8>been convicted in federal court. Of course, this all stems

0:14:30.200 --> 0:14:32.640
<v Speaker 8>from his purchase of a gun in twenty eighteen when

0:14:32.640 --> 0:14:35.440
<v Speaker 8>he was addicted, according to prosecutors, to crack cocaine. And

0:14:35.440 --> 0:14:39.320
<v Speaker 8>this jury has indeed agreed with the prosecution, finding him

0:14:39.360 --> 0:14:42.120
<v Speaker 8>guilty of these three crimes, which he will be sentenced

0:14:42.120 --> 0:14:44.120
<v Speaker 8>for not today but in a number of weeks. It

0:14:44.120 --> 0:14:47.840
<v Speaker 8>potentially carries a maximum sentence of twenty five years in prison,

0:14:47.880 --> 0:14:50.640
<v Speaker 8>although it's unlikely that maximum sentence would be given for

0:14:50.760 --> 0:14:53.600
<v Speaker 8>a first time offender. But obviously this has massive both

0:14:53.640 --> 0:14:57.520
<v Speaker 8>personal and political implications for the incumbent president. Of course,

0:14:57.680 --> 0:14:59.960
<v Speaker 8>this is the son of Joe Biden we are talking about,

0:15:00.120 --> 0:15:04.000
<v Speaker 8>could potentially bring political ramification to him as well, in

0:15:04.040 --> 0:15:06.960
<v Speaker 8>addition to a great deal of personal difficulty. We have

0:15:07.040 --> 0:15:10.120
<v Speaker 8>heard from President Biden affirmed just days ago that he

0:15:10.160 --> 0:15:13.080
<v Speaker 8>would not intervene and pardon his son if he was

0:15:13.120 --> 0:15:16.200
<v Speaker 8>indeed found guilty as he has been today. There could

0:15:16.280 --> 0:15:19.680
<v Speaker 8>potentially be some political upside here in that This, of course,

0:15:19.720 --> 0:15:22.240
<v Speaker 8>follows just less than two weeks ago Donald Trump being

0:15:22.240 --> 0:15:24.280
<v Speaker 8>found guilty in the court in New York of thirty

0:15:24.280 --> 0:15:27.360
<v Speaker 8>four felony counts and allegations from Trump and other Republicans

0:15:27.360 --> 0:15:30.440
<v Speaker 8>that the justice system has been weaponized against Donald Trump.

0:15:30.480 --> 0:15:32.840
<v Speaker 8>But it's the same justice system that has now found

0:15:33.240 --> 0:15:36.480
<v Speaker 8>Hunter Biden guilty of a number of crimes, so potentially

0:15:36.520 --> 0:15:38.840
<v Speaker 8>it throws some cold water on that argument. Still, though

0:15:39.120 --> 0:15:43.880
<v Speaker 8>it does shine uncomfortable spotlight on the president's family. And

0:15:44.120 --> 0:15:47.240
<v Speaker 8>this also is just one case in which Hunter Biden

0:15:47.400 --> 0:15:49.960
<v Speaker 8>had been charged with crimes. He does face a separate

0:15:49.960 --> 0:15:52.120
<v Speaker 8>trial in September on tax crimes.

0:15:52.120 --> 0:15:56.160
<v Speaker 3>Caroline, Yes, exactly that one in California. Can you give

0:15:56.240 --> 0:15:59.840
<v Speaker 3>us a breakdown of what next? Then, Kaylee posts this verdict.

0:16:00.200 --> 0:16:02.960
<v Speaker 8>Be awaiting sentencing, Caroline, is really the question here? As

0:16:02.960 --> 0:16:05.280
<v Speaker 8>I mentioned, twenty five years is the maximum. Two of

0:16:05.320 --> 0:16:08.640
<v Speaker 8>these gun charges carries a maximum sentence of ten years each,

0:16:08.720 --> 0:16:11.360
<v Speaker 8>the third a maximum sentence of five years. But this

0:16:11.480 --> 0:16:13.680
<v Speaker 8>is the first time that Biden has a Hunter Biden

0:16:13.720 --> 0:16:15.520
<v Speaker 8>that is, has been convicted of a crime, so that

0:16:15.560 --> 0:16:19.080
<v Speaker 8>could bring potentially more leniency, But really will be looking

0:16:19.480 --> 0:16:23.440
<v Speaker 8>to see what ultimately the judge decides is it will

0:16:23.680 --> 0:16:26.480
<v Speaker 8>be up to that one individual in terms of the sentencing.

0:16:26.520 --> 0:16:28.680
<v Speaker 8>Will also be looking to see whether there is an

0:16:28.680 --> 0:16:30.720
<v Speaker 8>appeal on the part of the defense and whether or

0:16:30.760 --> 0:16:33.240
<v Speaker 8>not they then look ahead to that trial that is

0:16:33.280 --> 0:16:35.640
<v Speaker 8>set to happen in September. If there is an appellate

0:16:35.680 --> 0:16:38.200
<v Speaker 8>process still paying out in this case, could they successfully

0:16:38.720 --> 0:16:41.920
<v Speaker 8>delay that trial potentially though they have not yet had

0:16:42.040 --> 0:16:44.440
<v Speaker 8>success in doing so, And It's worth keeping in mind

0:16:44.440 --> 0:16:47.479
<v Speaker 8>that September tax trial he will be facing in California

0:16:47.520 --> 0:16:51.000
<v Speaker 8>brings us ever closer to the presidential election in which

0:16:51.520 --> 0:16:54.520
<v Speaker 8>Joe Biden, his father, is trying to seek a re

0:16:54.640 --> 0:16:57.240
<v Speaker 8>election for a second term, and that timing potentially could

0:16:57.240 --> 0:17:00.440
<v Speaker 8>add even greater political difficulty than what we're seeing here

0:17:00.440 --> 0:17:02.880
<v Speaker 8>today with the conviction of the president's son the first

0:17:02.880 --> 0:17:05.480
<v Speaker 8>time in history. Again, Caroline, that this has happened to.

0:17:05.400 --> 0:17:08.800
<v Speaker 3>The child of a sitting president, and as he said, already,

0:17:08.960 --> 0:17:11.760
<v Speaker 3>President Biden has said he would not pardon. But I'm

0:17:11.760 --> 0:17:13.960
<v Speaker 3>interested as to whether we will hear from him, if

0:17:13.960 --> 0:17:16.119
<v Speaker 3>there's any idea as to whether he will speak on

0:17:16.160 --> 0:17:16.440
<v Speaker 3>the matter.

0:17:16.960 --> 0:17:19.640
<v Speaker 8>Well, he does have a scheduled speaking engagement today, He'll

0:17:19.640 --> 0:17:22.640
<v Speaker 8>actually be speaking at a gun safety event here in Washington,

0:17:22.640 --> 0:17:25.399
<v Speaker 8>and he's set to travel to the G seven in Italy.

0:17:25.440 --> 0:17:28.960
<v Speaker 8>This is where the personal and the presidential duty potentially

0:17:28.960 --> 0:17:32.040
<v Speaker 8>come into conflict, Caroline is obviously this is likely a

0:17:32.119 --> 0:17:34.680
<v Speaker 8>very difficult day for the Biden family. We will see

0:17:34.720 --> 0:17:37.600
<v Speaker 8>if he makes any statement on this before departing to Italy,

0:17:37.640 --> 0:17:39.480
<v Speaker 8>but when he does so, attends the G seven that

0:17:39.520 --> 0:17:42.080
<v Speaker 8>will be carrying out the duties of the presidency, trying

0:17:42.080 --> 0:17:45.040
<v Speaker 8>to focus on geopolitics, foreign policy, all of the other

0:17:45.119 --> 0:17:48.080
<v Speaker 8>responsibilities of this office, while also having to deal with

0:17:48.080 --> 0:17:51.600
<v Speaker 8>the difficulty of having your son the only living person

0:17:51.720 --> 0:17:54.040
<v Speaker 8>from the car crash that killed his first wife and

0:17:54.160 --> 0:17:57.560
<v Speaker 8>daughter many years ago. And of course, Bobiden, who had

0:17:57.560 --> 0:18:01.119
<v Speaker 8>survived that crash, died of cancer back in twenty fifteen,

0:18:01.119 --> 0:18:03.600
<v Speaker 8>and that is when many of Hunter Biden's addiction problems

0:18:03.760 --> 0:18:05.800
<v Speaker 8>really began, and that really was what was at the

0:18:05.800 --> 0:18:08.040
<v Speaker 8>heart of this case, Caroline. This is a story of

0:18:08.040 --> 0:18:10.600
<v Speaker 8>someone who was struggling with an addiction. This was very

0:18:10.640 --> 0:18:14.760
<v Speaker 8>painful as we saw ex girlfriends, ex wives, even Naomi Biden,

0:18:14.840 --> 0:18:18.720
<v Speaker 8>hunter Biden's daughter, testifying throughout this trial about the personal

0:18:18.760 --> 0:18:21.880
<v Speaker 8>difficulty and what he was grappling with over the course

0:18:21.920 --> 0:18:24.600
<v Speaker 8>of those years that he was an addict, And obviously

0:18:24.640 --> 0:18:27.760
<v Speaker 8>just shines a very uncomfortable spotlight on the first family.

0:18:28.640 --> 0:18:32.720
<v Speaker 3>Very personal, Kayleie, but very political in nature. And I

0:18:32.760 --> 0:18:36.440
<v Speaker 3>therefore wonder what impact you think it will have longer

0:18:36.560 --> 0:18:38.040
<v Speaker 3>term as we enter the election.

0:18:38.520 --> 0:18:40.760
<v Speaker 8>It's going to be hard to tell immediately, Caroline, as

0:18:40.800 --> 0:18:42.400
<v Speaker 8>it has been hard to tell just in the last

0:18:42.400 --> 0:18:44.800
<v Speaker 8>few weeks what the real impact of Donald Trump's own

0:18:45.200 --> 0:18:47.680
<v Speaker 8>felony conviction has been, as we haven't seen any great

0:18:47.720 --> 0:18:50.119
<v Speaker 8>shift in pulling thus far, so we'll see if it

0:18:50.160 --> 0:18:52.320
<v Speaker 8>actually has a material impact on the way that Joe

0:18:52.359 --> 0:18:54.680
<v Speaker 8>Biden is pulling. What I would point out here is

0:18:54.720 --> 0:18:57.200
<v Speaker 8>there is a very important distinction. What we are talking

0:18:57.200 --> 0:18:59.840
<v Speaker 8>about in this case is a conviction of the sun

0:19:00.080 --> 0:19:02.480
<v Speaker 8>the president, not someone who has held the office himself

0:19:02.720 --> 0:19:06.080
<v Speaker 8>or seeking to be president. That is different than Donald Trump,

0:19:06.080 --> 0:19:08.320
<v Speaker 8>who not only is a former president of the United States,

0:19:08.320 --> 0:19:11.840
<v Speaker 8>but currently is the presumptive Republican nominee. So while this

0:19:11.920 --> 0:19:14.680
<v Speaker 8>may complicate the messaging that Joe Biden and other Democrats

0:19:14.720 --> 0:19:17.280
<v Speaker 8>may want it to have utilized in this election cycle,

0:19:17.320 --> 0:19:21.200
<v Speaker 8>the idea that Donald Trump is morally questionable by being

0:19:21.200 --> 0:19:24.399
<v Speaker 8>a convicted felon, perhaps that argument gets more difficult to

0:19:24.400 --> 0:19:28.040
<v Speaker 8>make when your own son is also convicted of crime,

0:19:28.160 --> 0:19:30.760
<v Speaker 8>So that could be politically complicated. And of course, there

0:19:30.800 --> 0:19:33.399
<v Speaker 8>has been a lot of scrutiny in Congress of Hunter

0:19:33.440 --> 0:19:36.439
<v Speaker 8>Biden and the entire Biden family, a lot of allegations

0:19:36.480 --> 0:19:39.800
<v Speaker 8>made by many different members as part of the impeachment

0:19:39.800 --> 0:19:42.560
<v Speaker 8>inquiry that largely seems to have died down, but it'll

0:19:42.600 --> 0:19:45.080
<v Speaker 8>be interesting to see if this revs anything up in

0:19:45.119 --> 0:19:48.560
<v Speaker 8>that regard further congressionally as well. All that said, we're

0:19:48.600 --> 0:19:50.480
<v Speaker 8>really just going to have to be paying attention to

0:19:50.520 --> 0:19:52.520
<v Speaker 8>the polls. As right now it is June, we still

0:19:52.520 --> 0:19:55.240
<v Speaker 8>have almost five full months to go before the election

0:19:55.320 --> 0:19:57.600
<v Speaker 8>on November fifth, and a lot could happen between now

0:19:57.640 --> 0:20:00.879
<v Speaker 8>and then, including a second criminal trial of Hunter Biden.

0:20:01.160 --> 0:20:04.280
<v Speaker 3>Kaylie, We are, of course a business network. Is there

0:20:04.320 --> 0:20:09.480
<v Speaker 3>any implication on companies surrounding gunlow and indeed the way

0:20:09.520 --> 0:20:13.240
<v Speaker 3>that might direct travel for purchases, for demand for.

0:20:13.240 --> 0:20:17.119
<v Speaker 8>Supply, That's an interesting question, Caroline. Obviously, Joe Biden is

0:20:17.240 --> 0:20:20.359
<v Speaker 8>largely a president who has spoken about gun safety. He

0:20:20.400 --> 0:20:22.359
<v Speaker 8>will in fact be doing so at in every town

0:20:22.440 --> 0:20:25.040
<v Speaker 8>for a gun safety event later on today, which of

0:20:25.040 --> 0:20:27.200
<v Speaker 8>course is affiliated with Michael Bloomberg, the founder and.

0:20:27.160 --> 0:20:28.879
<v Speaker 4>Majority owner of Bloomberg LP.

0:20:29.040 --> 0:20:31.119
<v Speaker 8>But largely he is a president that has advocated for

0:20:31.200 --> 0:20:36.320
<v Speaker 8>greater gun control measures, which is difficult for perhaps explanation wise,

0:20:36.320 --> 0:20:39.679
<v Speaker 8>when your own son illegally purchased a firearmist, as he

0:20:39.760 --> 0:20:42.920
<v Speaker 8>was found guilty of doing today with this crack cocaine addiction.

0:20:43.359 --> 0:20:46.560
<v Speaker 8>Will it, though, materially change anything around gun laws, Caroline,

0:20:46.600 --> 0:20:49.520
<v Speaker 8>It's very unlikely, given that no matter what developments we

0:20:49.560 --> 0:20:52.000
<v Speaker 8>have seen in the gun violence area, mass shooting after

0:20:52.000 --> 0:20:54.600
<v Speaker 8>mass shooting in the United States, nothing really has ever

0:20:54.640 --> 0:20:57.680
<v Speaker 8>done legislatively. Joe Biden has signed a number of executive

0:20:57.760 --> 0:21:02.000
<v Speaker 8>orders looking to restrain gun purchases in some areas, but

0:21:02.520 --> 0:21:04.840
<v Speaker 8>it's something that you really can't crack down on with

0:21:04.840 --> 0:21:07.840
<v Speaker 8>that congressional approval, and with Republicans in control of the House,

0:21:07.880 --> 0:21:10.960
<v Speaker 8>that is unlikely to be happening, at least in this Congress.

0:21:11.200 --> 0:21:13.920
<v Speaker 3>The coolest of being put through the test at the moment, Kaylee,

0:21:13.960 --> 0:21:16.879
<v Speaker 3>Are we likely to anticipate more of this as a

0:21:16.880 --> 0:21:19.520
<v Speaker 3>political narrative, as a political way of doing business here

0:21:19.560 --> 0:21:20.359
<v Speaker 3>in the United States.

0:21:20.880 --> 0:21:23.280
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, it's an interesting question, Caroline, because we are at

0:21:23.280 --> 0:21:25.399
<v Speaker 8>this really unique moment in time where we now have

0:21:25.560 --> 0:21:28.199
<v Speaker 8>not just a former president and presumptive nominee who has

0:21:28.240 --> 0:21:31.080
<v Speaker 8>been convicted of crimes, but a president's son convicted of

0:21:31.080 --> 0:21:33.600
<v Speaker 8>crimes within the same week, both or with two week period.

0:21:33.600 --> 0:21:36.440
<v Speaker 8>Both of these obviously incredibly historic. We have never seen

0:21:36.480 --> 0:21:39.120
<v Speaker 8>anything like this before. It will be interesting to see

0:21:39.160 --> 0:21:41.959
<v Speaker 8>how this alters the narrative because after Donald Trump's conviction

0:21:42.000 --> 0:21:44.959
<v Speaker 8>of thirty four accounts in New York just less than

0:21:44.960 --> 0:21:47.479
<v Speaker 8>two weeks ago, there has been a narrative about a

0:21:47.640 --> 0:21:50.840
<v Speaker 8>justice system that has been weaponized or targeting Donald Trump,

0:21:50.880 --> 0:21:52.639
<v Speaker 8>whether or not that is true. As Joe Biden did

0:21:52.640 --> 0:21:54.720
<v Speaker 8>not actually have the power to say direct a New

0:21:54.800 --> 0:21:58.119
<v Speaker 8>York State case against Donald Trump, he could theoretically have

0:21:58.160 --> 0:22:00.920
<v Speaker 8>the power to step in with this Special Council investigation

0:22:00.960 --> 0:22:03.399
<v Speaker 8>into Hunter Biden, with this trial, potentially with the pardon,

0:22:03.560 --> 0:22:05.600
<v Speaker 8>and he has declined to do so. He has declined

0:22:05.840 --> 0:22:08.680
<v Speaker 8>to intervene as he has really been trying to speak

0:22:08.720 --> 0:22:11.679
<v Speaker 8>a message of preserving faith in the justice system and

0:22:11.720 --> 0:22:14.000
<v Speaker 8>allowing it to do its work. So now that this

0:22:14.080 --> 0:22:16.400
<v Speaker 8>has happened to his son being found guilty of three

0:22:16.520 --> 0:22:18.920
<v Speaker 8>crimes here in Delaware, it will be interesting to see

0:22:18.920 --> 0:22:21.440
<v Speaker 8>if it does indeed alter the narrative around the way

0:22:21.440 --> 0:22:23.639
<v Speaker 8>the justice system is working. Because you can no longer

0:22:23.640 --> 0:22:25.600
<v Speaker 8>say it's only going after Donald Trump.

0:22:25.640 --> 0:22:27.600
<v Speaker 4>It has come for a Biden as well.

0:22:27.880 --> 0:22:31.680
<v Speaker 3>Kayleie Lynes, just so much information to digest and reacting

0:22:31.720 --> 0:22:35.280
<v Speaker 3>in the moment to this finding from the court and

0:22:35.320 --> 0:22:38.160
<v Speaker 3>from the jury We thank you very much. Indeed, all

0:22:38.200 --> 0:22:41.560
<v Speaker 3>Things Washington now we return to all Things Technology. Coming up,

0:22:41.600 --> 0:22:43.720
<v Speaker 3>we're going to be deciding, well the direction.

0:22:43.520 --> 0:22:44.800
<v Speaker 4>Of travel for Apple going forward.

0:22:44.880 --> 0:22:47.119
<v Speaker 3>Laura Martin and Needham joining us with her reaction on

0:22:47.160 --> 0:22:50.679
<v Speaker 3>Apple's long awaited AI strategy. Well, she makes the iPhone

0:22:50.680 --> 0:22:52.359
<v Speaker 3>maker partnership with open AI.

0:22:52.760 --> 0:22:53.359
<v Speaker 4>That's next.

0:22:53.800 --> 0:22:56.359
<v Speaker 3>Plus, we already know where Elon Musk stands on Apple's

0:22:56.440 --> 0:23:00.159
<v Speaker 3>newly announced partnership, but he's getting some empathy. New e

0:23:00.359 --> 0:23:02.840
<v Speaker 3>State Minister for AI and Digital Economy, who spoke to

0:23:02.880 --> 0:23:04.560
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg earlier today, just.

0:23:04.560 --> 0:23:05.080
<v Speaker 4>Tic a listen.

0:23:05.600 --> 0:23:08.000
<v Speaker 9>What Elon said was, if it turns out that they're

0:23:08.000 --> 0:23:10.680
<v Speaker 9>going to deploy charg ept and open the eyes infrastructure

0:23:10.720 --> 0:23:14.359
<v Speaker 9>on the OS level, then there are some security risks.

0:23:14.440 --> 0:23:17.560
<v Speaker 9>I think given the quality of what they're doing and

0:23:17.640 --> 0:23:20.480
<v Speaker 9>the secrecy around the advancements that they're pushing forward, it

0:23:20.520 --> 0:23:22.160
<v Speaker 9>makes a lot of sense for him to think, aren't.

0:23:21.920 --> 0:23:39.040
<v Speaker 3>We welcome back to Bluemberg Technology. I'm Carolin Hide in

0:23:39.040 --> 0:23:41.720
<v Speaker 3>New York and moments ago with the breaking news that

0:23:41.760 --> 0:23:45.359
<v Speaker 3>a Delaware jury has reached a verdict finding Hunter Biden

0:23:45.480 --> 0:23:49.640
<v Speaker 3>guilty of gun charges. Now he was found guilty by

0:23:49.640 --> 0:23:52.120
<v Speaker 3>a federal court jury and has become the first child

0:23:52.160 --> 0:23:54.960
<v Speaker 3>of a sitting US president to be convicted of such crimes.

0:23:55.440 --> 0:23:57.320
<v Speaker 3>Now we know that the verdict came less than two

0:23:57.320 --> 0:24:00.160
<v Speaker 3>weeks after his father's chief rival for the president see

0:24:00.200 --> 0:24:02.520
<v Speaker 3>Donald Trump was found guilty by New York during his

0:24:02.640 --> 0:24:06.080
<v Speaker 3>thirty four counts of falsifying business records late last month.

0:24:07.000 --> 0:24:10.399
<v Speaker 3>Political system intertwines with the legal system, and to do

0:24:10.440 --> 0:24:14.320
<v Speaker 3>that with us, as bloombergs Greg Farrell, and extraordinary really

0:24:14.359 --> 0:24:19.159
<v Speaker 3>what we're currently seeing in terms of how the legal

0:24:19.200 --> 0:24:22.240
<v Speaker 3>system is becoming a focus for both presidential candidates. But

0:24:22.280 --> 0:24:24.159
<v Speaker 3>this one is novel in terms of the son of

0:24:24.200 --> 0:24:25.000
<v Speaker 3>a sitting president.

0:24:25.240 --> 0:24:30.280
<v Speaker 10>Yes, absolutely, Caroen, It's extraordinary. It's extraordinary because I think

0:24:30.320 --> 0:24:32.920
<v Speaker 10>Hunter Biden believed he had he you know, was totally

0:24:32.920 --> 0:24:34.760
<v Speaker 10>he had a deal a year ago to put this

0:24:34.840 --> 0:24:37.880
<v Speaker 10>behind him, and that fell apart. And it's a question

0:24:37.920 --> 0:24:41.200
<v Speaker 10>of timing with Donald Trump being charged in several places,

0:24:41.560 --> 0:24:45.240
<v Speaker 10>it's just so patently would be unfair. It looked the

0:24:45.280 --> 0:24:48.400
<v Speaker 10>optics would be terrible if Hunter Biden weren't charged and

0:24:49.400 --> 0:24:50.720
<v Speaker 10>you know, taken to trial.

0:24:52.119 --> 0:24:54.560
<v Speaker 4>How what did you make of the swiftness or not?

0:24:54.760 --> 0:24:57.080
<v Speaker 3>Many had felt that perhaps they're coming back a second day,

0:24:57.080 --> 0:24:59.159
<v Speaker 3>it hadn't been an immediate decision coming from the jury.

0:24:59.359 --> 0:25:01.439
<v Speaker 10>Well, I think it's of course, we don't know what

0:25:01.480 --> 0:25:03.560
<v Speaker 10>goes on in the room, but I think that if

0:25:03.600 --> 0:25:06.199
<v Speaker 10>they get it in the afternoon, let's think about it.

0:25:06.240 --> 0:25:09.080
<v Speaker 10>This is a serious thing. Let's not just drump fraternity conclusions.

0:25:09.119 --> 0:25:11.520
<v Speaker 10>Everybody sleeps on it. This is a normal thing, and

0:25:11.520 --> 0:25:13.320
<v Speaker 10>they all come back the next day. It's a pretty

0:25:13.320 --> 0:25:15.960
<v Speaker 10>simple case. And unfortunately for Hunter Biden, he wrote it

0:25:15.960 --> 0:25:18.359
<v Speaker 10>in a book what his condition was at the time,

0:25:18.680 --> 0:25:20.840
<v Speaker 10>and he didn't take the stand. So it's really not

0:25:20.880 --> 0:25:23.159
<v Speaker 10>a surprise in terms of the verdict. It's more, as

0:25:23.200 --> 0:25:26.480
<v Speaker 10>you pointed out, the magnitude of this, that this strangeness

0:25:26.480 --> 0:25:29.159
<v Speaker 10>of the world we're in where one former president's been

0:25:29.160 --> 0:25:31.119
<v Speaker 10>convicted one week and then the son of the current

0:25:31.160 --> 0:25:32.560
<v Speaker 10>president right now.

0:25:33.520 --> 0:25:35.720
<v Speaker 3>I asked this previously of Kayley, and I put it

0:25:35.720 --> 0:25:39.359
<v Speaker 3>to you as someone who so understands and embodies what

0:25:39.359 --> 0:25:41.960
<v Speaker 3>the legal system means for US politics, but the US

0:25:41.960 --> 0:25:42.760
<v Speaker 3>economy as well.

0:25:43.040 --> 0:25:45.560
<v Speaker 4>Is this the way of the land now?

0:25:45.600 --> 0:25:48.600
<v Speaker 3>Are we going to see far more legal system taking

0:25:48.640 --> 0:25:51.080
<v Speaker 3>action around political decision making?

0:25:51.320 --> 0:25:55.800
<v Speaker 10>Unfortunately, I don't believe necessary in the weaponization of the

0:25:56.040 --> 0:26:00.119
<v Speaker 10>Justice Department that's been claimed. However, now that we've gone there,

0:26:00.400 --> 0:26:04.119
<v Speaker 10>now that a local district attorney has riught charges against

0:26:04.119 --> 0:26:07.960
<v Speaker 10>the former president, it's you know, this is going to

0:26:07.960 --> 0:26:10.520
<v Speaker 10>get worse before it gets better. I don't think there's

0:26:10.520 --> 0:26:12.280
<v Speaker 10>going to be cooler heads that are going to prevail.

0:26:12.560 --> 0:26:17.040
<v Speaker 10>Whoever loses the election in November, might you know, get

0:26:17.040 --> 0:26:20.919
<v Speaker 10>even more galvanized, or whoever wins to you know, exact

0:26:20.960 --> 0:26:24.640
<v Speaker 10>some retribution. So it's a concerning time that way, Greg.

0:26:24.359 --> 0:26:28.879
<v Speaker 3>We really appreciate you analyzing what is another unprecedented finding

0:26:28.920 --> 0:26:32.040
<v Speaker 3>here Ander Biden found guilty of gun charges by a

0:26:32.040 --> 0:26:33.600
<v Speaker 3>federal court jury in Delaware.

0:26:34.119 --> 0:26:35.520
<v Speaker 4>Greg Farrell, we appreciate him.

0:26:35.560 --> 0:26:38.440
<v Speaker 3>Meanwhile, let's go back to what we do at Bloomberg.

0:26:38.440 --> 0:26:41.679
<v Speaker 3>The markets currently seeing course political risk evident over in

0:26:41.720 --> 0:26:44.439
<v Speaker 3>Europe and France in particular, under pressure, we close the

0:26:44.440 --> 0:26:46.639
<v Speaker 3>market down with the stocks it's undered off by almost

0:26:46.640 --> 0:26:49.879
<v Speaker 3>a percentage point France in particular, as Macron calls a

0:26:49.960 --> 0:26:53.360
<v Speaker 3>key vote and rumors did swirl as to what would

0:26:53.400 --> 0:26:55.600
<v Speaker 3>be the longevity of his own presidency. He of course

0:26:55.640 --> 0:26:57.920
<v Speaker 3>has refuted that for now and says that he would

0:26:58.000 --> 0:27:00.760
<v Speaker 3>remain Now's that one hundred the big tech benchmark currently

0:27:00.800 --> 0:27:02.879
<v Speaker 3>up at tenth f per percent. Apple guiding us higher.

0:27:03.040 --> 0:27:05.080
<v Speaker 3>Bitcoin on the downside of by more than four percent

0:27:05.119 --> 0:27:08.040
<v Speaker 3>as bonds sell off, a key correlation happening, and indeed

0:27:08.320 --> 0:27:11.520
<v Speaker 3>much trepidation as we look towards a federal reserve decision

0:27:11.560 --> 0:27:14.639
<v Speaker 3>this week and indeed an inflation print move on some

0:27:14.680 --> 0:27:16.879
<v Speaker 3>individual stocks for you. Look, we did get some earnings

0:27:16.920 --> 0:27:18.840
<v Speaker 3>coming out of Autodesk, and not good enough when it

0:27:18.840 --> 0:27:20.679
<v Speaker 3>comes to this software provider. We're off by five percent.

0:27:20.720 --> 0:27:23.760
<v Speaker 3>Tesla down by more than three percent. Interesting what we're

0:27:23.760 --> 0:27:26.640
<v Speaker 3>seeing currently with Tesla and JP Morgan having a note

0:27:26.640 --> 0:27:29.760
<v Speaker 3>out today really saying that having spoken to investor relations

0:27:29.760 --> 0:27:32.040
<v Speaker 3>over at the company, they worry that the revenue generation

0:27:32.080 --> 0:27:34.160
<v Speaker 3>of a robotaxi ain't coming anytime soon.

0:27:34.440 --> 0:27:35.560
<v Speaker 4>We're off by more than three percent.

0:27:35.600 --> 0:27:38.160
<v Speaker 3>But of course Elon Musk, the leader of Tesla, currently

0:27:38.200 --> 0:27:42.919
<v Speaker 3>distracted by well the frustrations he sees with Apple's relationship

0:27:42.960 --> 0:27:46.359
<v Speaker 3>with now Open ai and an integration of chatchpt within

0:27:46.680 --> 0:27:48.080
<v Speaker 3>Apple's operating system.

0:27:48.280 --> 0:27:49.320
<v Speaker 4>Apple currently up more.

0:27:49.160 --> 0:27:51.600
<v Speaker 3>Than six percent a new record high two hundred and

0:27:51.600 --> 0:27:53.680
<v Speaker 3>five is where we trade. And that's all because of

0:27:53.720 --> 0:27:57.480
<v Speaker 3>the WWDC conference, which of course opened yesterday with a

0:27:57.520 --> 0:28:00.679
<v Speaker 3>whole slate of software updates across products, partnership, as I

0:28:00.680 --> 0:28:03.160
<v Speaker 3>mentioned with Open AI, and of course it's long awaited

0:28:03.200 --> 0:28:05.560
<v Speaker 3>Apple Intelligence, his CEO Tim Cook.

0:28:06.600 --> 0:28:11.119
<v Speaker 2>Recent developments and generative intelligence and large language models offer

0:28:11.359 --> 0:28:15.920
<v Speaker 2>powerful capabilities that provide the opportunity to take the experience

0:28:15.960 --> 0:28:21.160
<v Speaker 2>of using Apple products to new heights. Introducing Apple Intelligence,

0:28:21.760 --> 0:28:25.320
<v Speaker 2>the new personal intelligence system that makes your most personal

0:28:25.440 --> 0:28:28.159
<v Speaker 2>products even more useful and delightful.

0:28:29.320 --> 0:28:31.840
<v Speaker 3>Apparently that video will being short in Apple devices as well.

0:28:31.920 --> 0:28:34.359
<v Speaker 3>Jackie Devlos who was there on the ground yesterday and

0:28:34.400 --> 0:28:37.199
<v Speaker 3>now life from San Francisco for us, and it felt

0:28:37.200 --> 0:28:40.000
<v Speaker 3>in the moment that perhaps there wasn't that wow factor,

0:28:40.040 --> 0:28:41.680
<v Speaker 3>but today the market showing there is.

0:28:42.040 --> 0:28:42.920
<v Speaker 4>That's right, Carolina.

0:28:42.920 --> 0:28:45.320
<v Speaker 11>It took the market a little while to catch up.

0:28:45.320 --> 0:28:49.680
<v Speaker 11>But notice how Tim Cook emphasized the word useful, that

0:28:49.880 --> 0:28:53.760
<v Speaker 11>theme utility. They mentioned AI for the rest of us,

0:28:53.760 --> 0:28:56.800
<v Speaker 11>and I think this really showed through in the features

0:28:56.800 --> 0:29:00.560
<v Speaker 11>that they highlighted yesterday as part of the Apple Intelligence rollout.

0:29:00.800 --> 0:29:04.320
<v Speaker 11>Let's like, look at the summarization capabilities that we now have,

0:29:04.480 --> 0:29:09.440
<v Speaker 11>transcription of audio. You can also personalize AI emojis. When

0:29:09.440 --> 0:29:11.640
<v Speaker 11>you think about just kind of the mass appeal that

0:29:11.720 --> 0:29:15.600
<v Speaker 11>can have, that was really key. They also emphasized privacy,

0:29:15.960 --> 0:29:19.520
<v Speaker 11>but outside of the AI features as well, that iOS

0:29:19.640 --> 0:29:23.720
<v Speaker 11>eighteen upgrade has some pretty cool things coming down the pipeline.

0:29:23.760 --> 0:29:27.280
<v Speaker 11>For example, you can tap back messages with different emojis,

0:29:27.320 --> 0:29:30.480
<v Speaker 11>You can schedule messages to be sent later. You can

0:29:30.560 --> 0:29:33.040
<v Speaker 11>access more apps in different ways in your control center,

0:29:33.440 --> 0:29:36.040
<v Speaker 11>organize them differently on the home screen. They really gave

0:29:36.080 --> 0:29:38.880
<v Speaker 11>a lot to people here in this rollout, but look,

0:29:38.960 --> 0:29:41.000
<v Speaker 11>we were sitting there for an hour and a half

0:29:41.040 --> 0:29:44.760
<v Speaker 11>before the AI highlights really came through, so there was

0:29:44.800 --> 0:29:47.680
<v Speaker 11>a lot of anticipation and look, this is their first swing,

0:29:48.120 --> 0:29:50.600
<v Speaker 11>and from what we could tell, you know, it's just

0:29:50.720 --> 0:29:53.880
<v Speaker 11>the first step in this broader AI rollout, and many.

0:29:53.720 --> 0:29:56.600
<v Speaker 3>Felt that actually only sort of name checking open AI

0:29:56.720 --> 0:30:00.800
<v Speaker 3>for two minutes within that ninety minute thereabouts present, it

0:30:00.880 --> 0:30:04.200
<v Speaker 3>was trying to suppress the actual real integration but really

0:30:04.280 --> 0:30:06.120
<v Speaker 3>lean into what it will do for you as a

0:30:06.160 --> 0:30:09.800
<v Speaker 3>consumer a user. I'm really trying to identify privacy and

0:30:09.880 --> 0:30:12.760
<v Speaker 3>protection being key, but you know, musk cooling that into.

0:30:12.720 --> 0:30:16.360
<v Speaker 11>Question exactly you know Siria was a major highlight because

0:30:16.960 --> 0:30:21.280
<v Speaker 11>that digital assistant will have the opportunity to basically be

0:30:21.320 --> 0:30:25.640
<v Speaker 11>able to pull information from Chat GPT when answering questions. Now,

0:30:25.800 --> 0:30:28.720
<v Speaker 11>you're absolutely right, privacy was highlighted, Caroline.

0:30:28.960 --> 0:30:30.480
<v Speaker 4>They made sure to note.

0:30:30.240 --> 0:30:32.800
<v Speaker 11>That you can opt out of this, that you have

0:30:32.880 --> 0:30:36.800
<v Speaker 11>to give Siri permission to tap into chat GPT and

0:30:36.840 --> 0:30:40.440
<v Speaker 11>when you think about the concerns that Elon Musk is raising, well,

0:30:40.440 --> 0:30:43.760
<v Speaker 11>it does also shine a spotlight on the other questions

0:30:43.760 --> 0:30:46.320
<v Speaker 11>that Apple has to answer. What exactly happens to the

0:30:46.440 --> 0:30:50.120
<v Speaker 11>data does open Ai have access to kind of seeing

0:30:50.120 --> 0:30:53.800
<v Speaker 11>how you interact with the app on the screen. There's

0:30:53.840 --> 0:30:56.040
<v Speaker 11>a lot that I think people want to know and

0:30:56.360 --> 0:30:58.080
<v Speaker 11>some of those details will come out, but they were

0:30:59.200 --> 0:31:02.720
<v Speaker 11>key to actually highlight that users will be asked for permission,

0:31:02.800 --> 0:31:06.240
<v Speaker 11>their request and informations will not be logged, so of course,

0:31:06.440 --> 0:31:09.560
<v Speaker 11>really keeping with that Apple privacy ethos.

0:31:09.520 --> 0:31:12.080
<v Speaker 3>Jackie Davis with a roundup, We thank you so much.

0:31:12.120 --> 0:31:14.240
<v Speaker 3>It was a long day yesterday and up early with

0:31:14.320 --> 0:31:16.680
<v Speaker 3>us today. We thank you. Let's keep this conversation going.

0:31:16.720 --> 0:31:19.120
<v Speaker 3>Laura Marson, Senior Entertainment and Internet Analyst. They wre at

0:31:19.200 --> 0:31:22.040
<v Speaker 3>Needham and Co. You join us for more after Well,

0:31:22.160 --> 0:31:24.720
<v Speaker 3>you're a buy on Apple, you've overall think that the

0:31:24.760 --> 0:31:26.400
<v Speaker 3>price point is going to go even higher than this,

0:31:26.440 --> 0:31:28.920
<v Speaker 3>to a two hundred and twenty dollars price point. But

0:31:29.560 --> 0:31:33.000
<v Speaker 3>what happened at the event yesterday and what galvanizes it today?

0:31:33.480 --> 0:31:33.680
<v Speaker 6>Right?

0:31:33.800 --> 0:31:35.760
<v Speaker 12>So, I mean, I think I think we were very

0:31:35.760 --> 0:31:39.280
<v Speaker 12>disappointed at the Apple generative of AI stuff. First they

0:31:39.320 --> 0:31:41.160
<v Speaker 12>put it last, As you said, they talked for sixty

0:31:41.200 --> 0:31:44.640
<v Speaker 12>five minutes about new colors and new things that felt

0:31:44.680 --> 0:31:48.320
<v Speaker 12>like Snapchat type of functionality, and then in minutes sixty

0:31:48.320 --> 0:31:50.600
<v Speaker 12>five they started talking about the only thing Wall Street

0:31:50.640 --> 0:31:54.400
<v Speaker 12>cares about because this company has very anemic growth. They're

0:31:54.440 --> 0:31:58.440
<v Speaker 12>going to report one percent revenue growth this year, and

0:31:59.160 --> 0:32:01.440
<v Speaker 12>what we really want to hear was what's going on

0:32:01.480 --> 0:32:04.000
<v Speaker 12>with jenerator of I that's going to force an iPhone

0:32:04.040 --> 0:32:08.240
<v Speaker 12>replacement cycle to drive that one percent revenue growth higher

0:32:08.320 --> 0:32:11.280
<v Speaker 12>to two three four percent? And there is nothing I

0:32:11.360 --> 0:32:14.600
<v Speaker 12>felt that they'd announced that made consumers want to run

0:32:14.640 --> 0:32:17.400
<v Speaker 12>out and replace their iPhone And now we have to

0:32:17.400 --> 0:32:20.320
<v Speaker 12>wait a year because they have an annual replacement cycle.

0:32:20.440 --> 0:32:22.480
<v Speaker 12>So now if you didn't like what you heard yesterday,

0:32:22.720 --> 0:32:24.600
<v Speaker 12>you have to wait a year till the next cool

0:32:24.680 --> 0:32:27.400
<v Speaker 12>generative AI stuff. So I mean, I thought it was

0:32:27.440 --> 0:32:29.520
<v Speaker 12>a very disappointing day, which is why the shares were

0:32:29.560 --> 0:32:32.120
<v Speaker 12>down two percent as soon as they finished speaking.

0:32:32.440 --> 0:32:33.680
<v Speaker 6>Today they're up six percent.

0:32:33.760 --> 0:32:36.480
<v Speaker 12>Maybe because the developers are finding cool ways that they

0:32:36.480 --> 0:32:40.360
<v Speaker 12>can integrate these functionality into their own individual apps. But

0:32:40.880 --> 0:32:42.920
<v Speaker 12>I thought it was too little, too late. They continue

0:32:42.960 --> 0:32:45.000
<v Speaker 12>to be way behind on janitor of AI and they

0:32:45.040 --> 0:32:45.880
<v Speaker 12>need to catch up.

0:32:45.800 --> 0:32:47.440
<v Speaker 3>And they seem to be trying to catch up with

0:32:47.560 --> 0:32:51.320
<v Speaker 3>for now third party relationships. What is the flow of

0:32:51.440 --> 0:32:54.000
<v Speaker 3>money here, Laura, Because they're not going to be charging

0:32:54.080 --> 0:32:56.800
<v Speaker 3>us for the joy of being suddenly able to use

0:32:57.120 --> 0:32:59.560
<v Speaker 3>chatchipts should we wish to do? How much are they

0:32:59.560 --> 0:33:01.480
<v Speaker 3>going to be paid and open a How much money

0:33:01.520 --> 0:33:03.000
<v Speaker 3>are they going to be having to spend or is

0:33:03.040 --> 0:33:05.640
<v Speaker 3>it good that they don't need all their own GPU

0:33:05.720 --> 0:33:08.200
<v Speaker 3>hole to a sad extent, Yeah, they say they're.

0:33:08.000 --> 0:33:10.840
<v Speaker 12>Going to be using their own servers within the to

0:33:10.880 --> 0:33:13.640
<v Speaker 12>so to hold on to the iOS data in their

0:33:13.680 --> 0:33:17.240
<v Speaker 12>own service in the cloud over at Microsoft. So I

0:33:17.280 --> 0:33:20.480
<v Speaker 12>do think they are still continuing to focus on privacy,

0:33:20.880 --> 0:33:23.720
<v Speaker 12>but I think the way the money works.

0:33:23.480 --> 0:33:24.160
<v Speaker 6>Is that they will.

0:33:24.200 --> 0:33:26.280
<v Speaker 12>The way these deals typically work is that Apple will

0:33:26.320 --> 0:33:29.840
<v Speaker 12>pay the Microsoft Cloud and Chat GPT probably a fixed

0:33:29.920 --> 0:33:32.800
<v Speaker 12>fee per month, and then they'll put it into your

0:33:32.840 --> 0:33:35.080
<v Speaker 12>iPhone price. So your iPhone price is going to go

0:33:35.120 --> 0:33:37.640
<v Speaker 12>from fourteen hundred dollars to fifteen hundred dollars and you'll

0:33:37.640 --> 0:33:41.160
<v Speaker 12>pay for it upfront. If they find there are heavy users,

0:33:41.200 --> 0:33:43.200
<v Speaker 12>my guess is they add a monthly tier. You know,

0:33:43.240 --> 0:33:45.360
<v Speaker 12>I pay twenty dollars a month right now for Chat

0:33:45.360 --> 0:33:48.480
<v Speaker 12>GPT four. My guess is Apple gets that for a

0:33:48.520 --> 0:33:51.840
<v Speaker 12>lower price, but they probably search charge heavy users of

0:33:51.840 --> 0:33:54.520
<v Speaker 12>that particular functionality. I think a lot of people because

0:33:54.560 --> 0:33:56.760
<v Speaker 12>of the privacy issue, will not use it, will not

0:33:56.840 --> 0:33:59.160
<v Speaker 12>call out to the cloud to chat GPT.

0:33:59.800 --> 0:34:01.280
<v Speaker 6>The Apple doesn't, isn't.

0:34:01.360 --> 0:34:03.640
<v Speaker 12>It's not costing Apple anymore for those users.

0:34:04.240 --> 0:34:07.680
<v Speaker 3>So maybe this key concern reference bytal Musk will be

0:34:07.800 --> 0:34:10.880
<v Speaker 3>listened to by some in the crowd. Laura, the reason

0:34:10.920 --> 0:34:12.920
<v Speaker 3>we love having on the show is the breadth of

0:34:12.920 --> 0:34:15.640
<v Speaker 3>analysis you do across so many of the tech pays

0:34:15.680 --> 0:34:16.400
<v Speaker 3>and entertainment.

0:34:16.600 --> 0:34:19.360
<v Speaker 4>I'm interested is to you know who is winning the.

0:34:19.440 --> 0:34:22.200
<v Speaker 3>Charge of any of the actual device makers or operating

0:34:22.239 --> 0:34:23.120
<v Speaker 3>system providers.

0:34:23.160 --> 0:34:25.640
<v Speaker 4>I mean, is alphabet doing any better with the Google offering?

0:34:25.920 --> 0:34:26.640
<v Speaker 4>The only thing.

0:34:26.480 --> 0:34:30.839
<v Speaker 12>That's strategic position for Google. Alphabet is better because they

0:34:30.880 --> 0:34:33.920
<v Speaker 12>have Cloud, so they get it cheaper because they own it.

0:34:34.160 --> 0:34:37.480
<v Speaker 12>They have Android, which is the direct competitor to iOS.

0:34:37.719 --> 0:34:40.120
<v Speaker 12>They have an ad driven business, which in search, which

0:34:40.160 --> 0:34:41.839
<v Speaker 12>means you have a lot of first party data. They

0:34:41.840 --> 0:34:44.080
<v Speaker 12>have YouTube in the world's moving to video. As we know,

0:34:44.239 --> 0:34:46.759
<v Speaker 12>YouTube is the number one streamer and makes a lot

0:34:46.800 --> 0:34:49.799
<v Speaker 12>of money now. It's the largest subscription streaming service as

0:34:49.800 --> 0:34:52.360
<v Speaker 12>well as the largest ad driven service, which gives them

0:34:52.400 --> 0:34:55.520
<v Speaker 12>first party data. So it feels like their strategic position

0:34:55.760 --> 0:34:58.600
<v Speaker 12>is a lot better. Even if they're sort of inferior

0:34:58.719 --> 0:35:01.040
<v Speaker 12>at every one of those things, they the fact they

0:35:01.080 --> 0:35:05.239
<v Speaker 12>do them all gives them really strong, better data on

0:35:05.280 --> 0:35:07.759
<v Speaker 12>you and also more ways to make money from you.

0:35:08.480 --> 0:35:11.000
<v Speaker 12>And they don't feel like they're strategically in a box.

0:35:11.120 --> 0:35:13.480
<v Speaker 12>Apple feels to me like it's strategically in a box.

0:35:13.520 --> 0:35:17.160
<v Speaker 12>It can't participate in Jenerator AI except for through it's

0:35:17.200 --> 0:35:21.160
<v Speaker 12>a million of billion five users, and that isn't really

0:35:21.160 --> 0:35:23.239
<v Speaker 12>true of Google. It feels like it's going to participate

0:35:23.440 --> 0:35:26.359
<v Speaker 12>across the globe and it's three billion users a day

0:35:26.600 --> 0:35:27.880
<v Speaker 12>that come in for search.

0:35:28.440 --> 0:35:30.120
<v Speaker 4>Such great context.

0:35:30.320 --> 0:35:32.799
<v Speaker 3>Laura Martin, thank you for joining us, senior Entertainment and

0:35:32.880 --> 0:35:35.759
<v Speaker 3>Internet Internet analyst over at Needham and Co. Didn't even

0:35:35.760 --> 0:35:38.560
<v Speaker 3>get onto paramount with her. Next time we were coming up,

0:35:38.680 --> 0:35:41.600
<v Speaker 3>Masha Boucher's Day one Ventures announces it's biggest fun yet.

0:35:42.080 --> 0:35:45.120
<v Speaker 4>We're backing from nine female limited partners. We sit down

0:35:45.120 --> 0:35:45.359
<v Speaker 4>with her.

0:35:46.120 --> 0:35:48.000
<v Speaker 3>I mean, well, let's just look at what's happening on

0:35:48.000 --> 0:35:51.760
<v Speaker 3>the stock market elsewhere. Spotify up a percentage point. Now

0:35:51.880 --> 0:35:54.320
<v Speaker 3>we're understanding here at Bloomberg. But the company will introduce

0:35:54.360 --> 0:35:57.520
<v Speaker 3>a new higher price premium plan for some of its

0:35:57.600 --> 0:35:59.399
<v Speaker 3>users later this year. The plan is going to cost

0:35:59.400 --> 0:36:02.279
<v Speaker 3>at least five dollars more per month, but it's going

0:36:02.320 --> 0:36:05.600
<v Speaker 3>to include access to high fidelity audio, to new playlisting tools.

0:36:05.800 --> 0:36:06.960
<v Speaker 4>If you're an addict, you're gonna want it.

0:36:07.000 --> 0:36:32.520
<v Speaker 3>Apparently from New York, this will been my technology.

0:36:22.600 --> 0:36:23.120
<v Speaker 4>At this stage.

0:36:23.200 --> 0:36:25.719
<v Speaker 3>VC firm Day one Ventures has announced it's raised one

0:36:25.760 --> 0:36:28.359
<v Speaker 3>hundred and fifty million dollars for its latest fun Fun

0:36:28.440 --> 0:36:31.880
<v Speaker 3>three joining us now Masha Buche, founder general partner at

0:36:31.960 --> 0:36:34.120
<v Speaker 3>Day one Ventures, and it is the biggest haul of

0:36:34.120 --> 0:36:36.759
<v Speaker 3>money thus far and some interesting LPs talk to us

0:36:36.760 --> 0:36:37.880
<v Speaker 3>about how you brought them together.

0:36:38.560 --> 0:36:41.200
<v Speaker 13>Hi, I think lots of nice to be here, and

0:36:41.239 --> 0:36:43.520
<v Speaker 13>I think a lot of that of what we have

0:36:43.600 --> 0:36:47.200
<v Speaker 13>accomplished this because of the great work of the founders

0:36:47.200 --> 0:36:49.920
<v Speaker 13>that we've had a luck investing in and working together with.

0:36:50.440 --> 0:36:53.480
<v Speaker 3>So interestingly, some of those founders are now your investors.

0:36:53.680 --> 0:36:56.800
<v Speaker 3>How many of your original portfolio companies from initial funds

0:36:57.080 --> 0:36:58.520
<v Speaker 3>have put money in you now?

0:36:59.719 --> 0:37:02.080
<v Speaker 13>We were likely to be backed by a few dozens

0:37:02.120 --> 0:37:07.040
<v Speaker 13>of founders, including ten Unicorn founders, and including fourteen founders

0:37:07.080 --> 0:37:09.840
<v Speaker 13>that were previously backed, which is beautiful to see because

0:37:10.120 --> 0:37:13.240
<v Speaker 13>it just approves that we, on the one hand, partnered

0:37:13.320 --> 0:37:17.640
<v Speaker 13>with very successful and promising entrepreneurs who became successful financially

0:37:17.880 --> 0:37:18.319
<v Speaker 13>so they.

0:37:18.239 --> 0:37:19.759
<v Speaker 4>Can afford to be backing the fund.

0:37:20.040 --> 0:37:21.960
<v Speaker 13>And on the other hand, it's also proved that we

0:37:21.960 --> 0:37:25.120
<v Speaker 13>were able to build this partnerships that's like were like

0:37:25.160 --> 0:37:27.360
<v Speaker 13>a very strong bond and they were happy with the

0:37:27.400 --> 0:37:29.360
<v Speaker 13>experience they got as founders.

0:37:29.520 --> 0:37:30.960
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, let's talk about the partnership.

0:37:30.960 --> 0:37:34.719
<v Speaker 3>Because you got an interesting route into venture funding, and

0:37:35.200 --> 0:37:38.279
<v Speaker 3>initially you built a public relations company. You help these

0:37:38.360 --> 0:37:42.200
<v Speaker 3>founders tell their stories, and did that allow you therefore

0:37:42.239 --> 0:37:45.640
<v Speaker 3>to get access to early opportunities to invest and you

0:37:45.680 --> 0:37:46.160
<v Speaker 3>built from that.

0:37:46.719 --> 0:37:49.720
<v Speaker 13>Yeah, I think what started I started, like I started

0:37:49.719 --> 0:37:53.239
<v Speaker 13>two companies before. In previous company was PR Studios that

0:37:53.440 --> 0:37:57.000
<v Speaker 13>I created, and we're out of thirty customers that I

0:37:57.080 --> 0:38:00.439
<v Speaker 13>took out of a few hundreds, ten became you Courns

0:38:00.440 --> 0:38:03.279
<v Speaker 13>in twenty seventeen. And it just brought me to understanding

0:38:03.320 --> 0:38:07.120
<v Speaker 13>that lots of companies im betting on as a PR

0:38:07.560 --> 0:38:10.719
<v Speaker 13>as a publicist of becoming successful. So I pivoted and

0:38:10.800 --> 0:38:13.520
<v Speaker 13>change your Investor, which also like went very well, and

0:38:13.560 --> 0:38:16.080
<v Speaker 13>I had a lot of exits and few unicorns, and

0:38:16.200 --> 0:38:19.000
<v Speaker 13>that enabled me to get experience to be able to

0:38:19.200 --> 0:38:21.600
<v Speaker 13>create new funds in twenty eighteen.

0:38:22.360 --> 0:38:23.800
<v Speaker 4>So that's how it happened.

0:38:23.840 --> 0:38:27.000
<v Speaker 13>But speaking about communication, I think if you look at

0:38:27.040 --> 0:38:29.799
<v Speaker 13>like any business problems that you want to solve, and

0:38:29.960 --> 0:38:32.000
<v Speaker 13>any business goal or task you want to solve, I

0:38:32.000 --> 0:38:36.440
<v Speaker 13>think ninety percent of business problems they actually communications problems.

0:38:36.520 --> 0:38:39.480
<v Speaker 13>And I think this is something that we train founders

0:38:39.520 --> 0:38:41.439
<v Speaker 13>to solve, and this is something that we help them

0:38:41.760 --> 0:38:43.000
<v Speaker 13>to do.

0:38:43.880 --> 0:38:45.160
<v Speaker 4>For video includes well.

0:38:45.200 --> 0:38:47.680
<v Speaker 3>Coin of course, the Cryptoi startup that was in some

0:38:47.719 --> 0:38:50.440
<v Speaker 3>ways co founded by Sam Altman. You've also got do

0:38:50.520 --> 0:38:53.680
<v Speaker 3>not Pay, You've got you dot Com. It's interesting that

0:38:53.719 --> 0:38:56.960
<v Speaker 3>these little male founders, but you focused on female LPs

0:38:57.000 --> 0:38:59.239
<v Speaker 3>to a certain extent. How many female founders do you

0:38:59.280 --> 0:39:00.319
<v Speaker 3>have within your full vido?

0:39:01.239 --> 0:39:05.239
<v Speaker 13>We are likely to beck over forty female founders, that's

0:39:05.400 --> 0:39:08.319
<v Speaker 13>our portfolio. I was also very proud that was Fund three,

0:39:08.360 --> 0:39:12.360
<v Speaker 13>we were able to bring nine female limited partners because

0:39:12.600 --> 0:39:15.160
<v Speaker 13>funds you had no limited partners and for Funds three,

0:39:15.200 --> 0:39:17.880
<v Speaker 13>I really had a big goal and North start to

0:39:17.920 --> 0:39:21.200
<v Speaker 13>be able to find their few female alps and quit

0:39:21.280 --> 0:39:24.080
<v Speaker 13>proud that we were able to find nine very successful,

0:39:24.280 --> 0:39:27.240
<v Speaker 13>mostly female interrepreneurs that decided to beg this fund.

0:39:27.840 --> 0:39:30.880
<v Speaker 3>We'll bring them on Masha Bucha. It's a really interesting story.

0:39:30.920 --> 0:39:32.719
<v Speaker 3>Biggest fun today, one hundred fifty million.

0:39:32.760 --> 0:39:33.560
<v Speaker 4>We thank you so much.

0:39:33.640 --> 0:39:43.960
<v Speaker 3>Day one Ventures, thanks for stopping Divide the studio. We

0:39:44.080 --> 0:39:46.680
<v Speaker 3>just want to return to that breaking news regarding the

0:39:46.719 --> 0:39:51.840
<v Speaker 3>Biden administration potentially considering further restrictions yet further on China's

0:39:51.840 --> 0:39:55.080
<v Speaker 3>access to chip technology use for artificial intelligence, that targetting

0:39:55.120 --> 0:39:59.200
<v Speaker 3>new hardware that's now only making its way very slowly

0:39:59.239 --> 0:40:02.400
<v Speaker 3>into the market, DEAA Gate all around, it's basically the

0:40:02.400 --> 0:40:06.080
<v Speaker 3>most cutting edge chip architecture that really at the moment

0:40:06.120 --> 0:40:08.719
<v Speaker 3>we're seeing semiconductive companies just starting to adopt and make

0:40:08.760 --> 0:40:11.120
<v Speaker 3>them more powerful. But this could be affecting the likes

0:40:11.120 --> 0:40:13.920
<v Speaker 3>of Nvidia in particular. We're seeing pressure on some of

0:40:13.920 --> 0:40:18.080
<v Speaker 3>these stocks. More broadly, let's talk about the ecosystem of

0:40:18.160 --> 0:40:21.880
<v Speaker 3>technology with Law Negier. It's an analyst portfolio manager of

0:40:21.920 --> 0:40:24.640
<v Speaker 3>at Comngest that's a boutique asset management group that's more

0:40:24.680 --> 0:40:27.239
<v Speaker 3>than thirty two billion dollars in assets under management and.

0:40:27.560 --> 0:40:30.240
<v Speaker 4>Some big great bets on some key.

0:40:30.040 --> 0:40:33.800
<v Speaker 3>Companies within the mag seven and more broadly, are you

0:40:33.840 --> 0:40:36.640
<v Speaker 3>anticipating yet more geopolitics to interfere with some of the

0:40:36.640 --> 0:40:38.000
<v Speaker 3>investing landscape here.

0:40:38.160 --> 0:40:38.719
<v Speaker 4>Yes, we do.

0:40:38.880 --> 0:40:41.759
<v Speaker 14>I mean we think it will affect sentiment. Now there

0:40:41.800 --> 0:40:45.080
<v Speaker 14>will be disentangling of sentiment and then hard reality and

0:40:45.120 --> 0:40:47.239
<v Speaker 14>the p and ls. But yes, we think geopolitics and

0:40:47.280 --> 0:40:49.080
<v Speaker 14>the impact on this sector is here to stay.

0:40:49.280 --> 0:40:51.520
<v Speaker 3>What's interesting is thus far in Video, even though it's

0:40:51.520 --> 0:40:54.759
<v Speaker 3>sold into China, significantly has not been buffeted around too

0:40:54.800 --> 0:40:57.000
<v Speaker 3>much in terms of its market capitalization because of this,

0:40:57.320 --> 0:41:00.120
<v Speaker 3>because they've had a bigger demand coming from the US

0:41:00.239 --> 0:41:04.680
<v Speaker 3>and well Western economies. Is that going to counterbalance? Is

0:41:04.680 --> 0:41:06.960
<v Speaker 3>that going to be enough to sustain these heavy valuations?

0:41:08.200 --> 0:41:11.319
<v Speaker 14>Tough one, but certainly you know the demand is very

0:41:11.480 --> 0:41:15.359
<v Speaker 14>very strong and projected to outstrip supply for a good

0:41:15.440 --> 0:41:15.879
<v Speaker 14>long while.

0:41:15.920 --> 0:41:19.200
<v Speaker 3>Yet TSMC, for example, I believe is one of the

0:41:19.280 --> 0:41:22.400
<v Speaker 3>key bets and beneficiaries you've called out in artificial intelligence?

0:41:22.640 --> 0:41:23.960
<v Speaker 4>Why those particular names.

0:41:23.960 --> 0:41:27.080
<v Speaker 3>Where are we seeing the money flow when it comes

0:41:27.120 --> 0:41:30.000
<v Speaker 3>to picks and shovels than into the application of AI.

0:41:30.320 --> 0:41:34.880
<v Speaker 14>Yeah, And when you think of Nvidia and then everything

0:41:35.000 --> 0:41:38.480
<v Speaker 14>that supplies into it, there's TSMC. Well, nvidia' is a

0:41:38.520 --> 0:41:41.680
<v Speaker 14>TSMC customer, then there's the suppliers to TSMC.

0:41:42.040 --> 0:41:43.640
<v Speaker 4>So there's very direct.

0:41:43.239 --> 0:41:45.200
<v Speaker 14>Plays in the sector, and then there's more and more

0:41:45.200 --> 0:41:48.279
<v Speaker 14>indirect place. And it's quite fun to be thinking not

0:41:48.360 --> 0:41:51.000
<v Speaker 14>just about those direct plays, but some of the indirect plays.

0:41:50.800 --> 0:41:53.160
<v Speaker 4>As yeah, has the other has a video got too crowded?

0:41:53.200 --> 0:41:55.839
<v Speaker 3>Have you felt that people aren't looking more broadly at

0:41:55.840 --> 0:41:57.720
<v Speaker 3>this overall ecosystem?

0:41:57.880 --> 0:41:58.600
<v Speaker 14>Well, it's hard to say.

0:41:58.640 --> 0:41:59.600
<v Speaker 4>Nvidia is not known.

0:42:00.239 --> 0:42:04.040
<v Speaker 14>So starting from that place, we like to think who's

0:42:04.120 --> 0:42:06.799
<v Speaker 14>supplying to them, who's a client of theirs, How can

0:42:06.840 --> 0:42:08.040
<v Speaker 14>we play this a bit differently.

0:42:08.080 --> 0:42:10.200
<v Speaker 4>Perhaps where else can you play it differently?

0:42:10.280 --> 0:42:13.120
<v Speaker 3>Because I know that we're thinking of Apple trying to

0:42:13.120 --> 0:42:15.600
<v Speaker 3>play catch up when it comes to application and use

0:42:15.760 --> 0:42:18.560
<v Speaker 3>real use case of ltificial intelligence by you and I

0:42:18.600 --> 0:42:21.640
<v Speaker 3>in a consumer way, But how is it being adopted

0:42:21.640 --> 0:42:23.480
<v Speaker 3>elsewhere and which companies are going to benefit?

0:42:23.920 --> 0:42:27.360
<v Speaker 14>So there's a supplier to TSMC that makes the EUV,

0:42:27.719 --> 0:42:31.879
<v Speaker 14>the extreme ultraviolet lithography equipment called ASML, which has become

0:42:31.960 --> 0:42:34.359
<v Speaker 14>quite well known, but just a few years ago was not.

0:42:35.440 --> 0:42:39.240
<v Speaker 14>There are companies like Hoya and Shinetsu Chemical and Japan.

0:42:39.840 --> 0:42:43.200
<v Speaker 14>They make Hoya makes the mask blanks that are used

0:42:43.239 --> 0:42:49.280
<v Speaker 14>to design the semiconductor circuits onto the wafers, and Shinetsu

0:42:49.360 --> 0:42:52.400
<v Speaker 14>Chemical is a leader in the wafer space. So those

0:42:52.480 --> 0:42:54.440
<v Speaker 14>tend to be a little bit less well known, and

0:42:54.520 --> 0:42:57.640
<v Speaker 14>yet they're very present in the supply chain and great beneficiaries.

0:42:57.719 --> 0:42:58.520
<v Speaker 4>Got to get global.

0:42:59.040 --> 0:43:01.400
<v Speaker 3>Have you got to trade and actively trade this market

0:43:01.600 --> 0:43:04.560
<v Speaker 3>or you just sit and wait for valuations to rise.

0:43:04.760 --> 0:43:06.880
<v Speaker 14>We think this has been a great buy and hold

0:43:07.000 --> 0:43:11.400
<v Speaker 14>space because you know, right now sentiment is very very buoyant,

0:43:11.680 --> 0:43:15.520
<v Speaker 14>but look back two three years ago, everyone was extremely depressed.

0:43:16.160 --> 0:43:18.719
<v Speaker 14>The geopolitics were weighing very heavily. So it's actually a

0:43:18.719 --> 0:43:21.000
<v Speaker 14>wonderful space to be a long term buy and hold

0:43:21.360 --> 0:43:25.000
<v Speaker 14>investor with the ability when you're brave to buy more

0:43:25.160 --> 0:43:26.239
<v Speaker 14>when the sentiment's down.

0:43:26.440 --> 0:43:27.520
<v Speaker 4>You're buying mil right now.

0:43:28.160 --> 0:43:31.000
<v Speaker 3>Hah, you just said sentiment results, so I suppose not.

0:43:32.320 --> 0:43:33.919
<v Speaker 4>It's great to have you here. Come back.

0:43:33.960 --> 0:43:37.200
<v Speaker 3>I know you're passing through New York, Lord Nejia talking

0:43:37.280 --> 0:43:40.239
<v Speaker 3>all things tech. Comeest analyst and portfolio manager. Meanwhile, that

0:43:40.280 --> 0:43:42.040
<v Speaker 3>does it for this edition of Blue Meg Technology. Do

0:43:42.080 --> 0:43:44.239
<v Speaker 3>not forget to check out our podcast. Provide it on

0:43:44.239 --> 0:43:46.880
<v Speaker 3>the terminal as well as online on Apple, Spotify, and

0:43:46.960 --> 0:43:48.840
<v Speaker 3>iHeart as a Blue meag Technology