WEBVTT - Intel's Gelsinger Retires, Retailers Ready for Cyber Monday

0:00:01.600 --> 0:00:04.360
<v Speaker 1>From the heart of where Innovation of Money and Power

0:00:04.480 --> 0:00:06.880
<v Speaker 1>Collie in Silicon Valley, NBN.

0:00:07.200 --> 0:00:08.920
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg.

0:00:08.400 --> 0:00:11.719
<v Speaker 1>Technology with Caroline Hyde and Ed Ludlove.

0:00:24.920 --> 0:00:27.480
<v Speaker 3>Live from New York. This is Bloomberg Technology coming up.

0:00:27.520 --> 0:00:31.479
<v Speaker 4>Intel shares rise a CEO Pat Gelsinger leaves the company

0:00:31.560 --> 0:00:35.400
<v Speaker 4>after a failed turnaround effort plus Tesla and byd ramp

0:00:35.479 --> 0:00:38.720
<v Speaker 4>up discounts and incentives in China in a final push

0:00:38.760 --> 0:00:42.440
<v Speaker 4>to meet annual sales targets and tenstorrant NAB's a two

0:00:42.520 --> 0:00:45.680
<v Speaker 4>point six billion dollar valuation off the backing from Jeff Bezos.

0:00:45.720 --> 0:00:48.000
<v Speaker 4>And in Nvidia, we sit down with the CEO and

0:00:48.080 --> 0:00:51.519
<v Speaker 4>chip design legend Jim Keller later this hour. But first

0:00:52.320 --> 0:00:54.880
<v Speaker 4>check on these markets, a check in on Intel. We

0:00:55.000 --> 0:00:58.240
<v Speaker 4>dive straight there. We are more than three percent on

0:00:58.320 --> 0:01:00.800
<v Speaker 4>the back of the news that Intel CEOPA Gelsinger is

0:01:00.920 --> 0:01:03.840
<v Speaker 4>leaving the company and is indeed going to be two

0:01:04.200 --> 0:01:07.200
<v Speaker 4>interim CEOs that take the helm for the time being,

0:01:07.280 --> 0:01:11.440
<v Speaker 4>CFO David Sinsner Michelle Johnston Helpo's going to be serving

0:01:11.480 --> 0:01:14.400
<v Speaker 4>as the interim leaders as the board searchers for a replacement.

0:01:14.720 --> 0:01:18.440
<v Speaker 4>This after, of course, his departure is potentially signaling more

0:01:18.480 --> 0:01:19.920
<v Speaker 4>strategic shifts at the business.

0:01:20.600 --> 0:01:22.640
<v Speaker 3>The investor base collaps.

0:01:22.360 --> 0:01:24.880
<v Speaker 4>It slightly, but we get into the details with Man

0:01:24.880 --> 0:01:26.360
<v Speaker 4>Deep Singer, BlueBag Intelligence.

0:01:27.000 --> 0:01:29.360
<v Speaker 3>Look, many would say they're surprised.

0:01:29.400 --> 0:01:31.680
<v Speaker 4>Many would say, Look, the August numbers that came from

0:01:31.680 --> 0:01:34.440
<v Speaker 4>Intel just showed that this turnaround, this restruction was going

0:01:34.480 --> 0:01:37.240
<v Speaker 4>to be so painful, and the boarders lost confidence.

0:01:37.560 --> 0:01:40.200
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, and look, I think it probably suggests that the

0:01:40.319 --> 0:01:44.120
<v Speaker 5>numbers for four Q don't look very good either. So clearly,

0:01:44.280 --> 0:01:47.480
<v Speaker 5>you know, the gross margin going down, and the foundry

0:01:47.520 --> 0:01:50.440
<v Speaker 5>business was a big contributor to that because even though

0:01:50.480 --> 0:01:53.840
<v Speaker 5>you know, Intel has about eighteen billion dollars of foundry revenue,

0:01:54.120 --> 0:01:57.240
<v Speaker 5>it's negative gross margins. And when you think about that

0:01:57.320 --> 0:02:01.120
<v Speaker 5>eighteen billion dollar number, how much of that business comes

0:02:01.160 --> 0:02:04.560
<v Speaker 5>from the outside, Like they don't have any big customers

0:02:04.600 --> 0:02:06.760
<v Speaker 5>like TSMC does. You know, when it comes to the

0:02:07.120 --> 0:02:09.960
<v Speaker 5>foundry business, it's mostly internal when you think about that

0:02:10.040 --> 0:02:12.800
<v Speaker 5>eighteen billion dollar number. So that's where you know, the

0:02:12.880 --> 0:02:17.040
<v Speaker 5>question marks were raised around Intel's capex of around twenty

0:02:17.040 --> 0:02:19.639
<v Speaker 5>five billion, which is the major reason why they are,

0:02:19.720 --> 0:02:23.720
<v Speaker 5>you know, burning fifteen billion dollars a year, and I

0:02:23.760 --> 0:02:27.000
<v Speaker 5>think pat had about four years to decide on the

0:02:27.040 --> 0:02:30.640
<v Speaker 5>fate of the foundry business. He actually wanted to acquire

0:02:30.680 --> 0:02:34.280
<v Speaker 5>power Semis that didn't happen because of regulatory hurdles. So

0:02:34.280 --> 0:02:37.720
<v Speaker 5>you have to ask yourself was focusing on foundry business

0:02:37.720 --> 0:02:40.400
<v Speaker 5>the right strategy and the answer probably is not, given

0:02:40.480 --> 0:02:43.080
<v Speaker 5>it hasn't turned around in the last four years.

0:02:42.840 --> 0:02:45.079
<v Speaker 4>And yet the US government is handing them a lot

0:02:45.080 --> 0:02:47.720
<v Speaker 4>of money to build chicks to be the future of

0:02:47.800 --> 0:02:48.480
<v Speaker 4>on shoring.

0:02:49.000 --> 0:02:50.520
<v Speaker 3>How resilient does that look?

0:02:50.560 --> 0:02:54.240
<v Speaker 4>How resilient does well trying to do both manufacturing and

0:02:54.280 --> 0:02:55.320
<v Speaker 4>design look for the business.

0:02:55.400 --> 0:02:58.080
<v Speaker 6>Yes, so you're absolutely right the government wants them to

0:02:58.120 --> 0:03:01.440
<v Speaker 6>succeed on the manufacturing side. The problem is the optics here.

0:03:01.760 --> 0:03:05.360
<v Speaker 6>Why would an Amazon or a Microsoft, or an Nvidia

0:03:05.400 --> 0:03:08.200
<v Speaker 6>for that matter, go to Intel foundry when they know

0:03:08.280 --> 0:03:11.160
<v Speaker 6>Intel is a competitor on the design side. And that's

0:03:11.200 --> 0:03:15.919
<v Speaker 6>where you know, divesting that foundry business will actually make it,

0:03:16.120 --> 0:03:20.680
<v Speaker 6>you know, more palatable for competitors like Amazon and Nvidia

0:03:20.720 --> 0:03:24.080
<v Speaker 6>to use some portion of Intel's foundry, similar to what

0:03:24.280 --> 0:03:27.120
<v Speaker 6>MD did with Global Foundaries. I mean, Global Foundry has

0:03:27.160 --> 0:03:30.040
<v Speaker 6>a lot of business outside of MD now because it's

0:03:30.080 --> 0:03:33.800
<v Speaker 6>an independent entity. So that's where the gross market profile

0:03:33.880 --> 0:03:37.560
<v Speaker 6>will still be a lot lower for the foundry business,

0:03:37.600 --> 0:03:40.880
<v Speaker 6>but at least the core Intel business, which is how

0:03:41.000 --> 0:03:43.320
<v Speaker 6>investors look at some of the parts of Intel and

0:03:43.360 --> 0:03:46.680
<v Speaker 6>they say, the core client PC business is still where

0:03:46.760 --> 0:03:49.800
<v Speaker 6>they dominate. I mean, look the server side, they are

0:03:50.000 --> 0:03:53.320
<v Speaker 6>leading share to Nvidia, but more than fifty percent of

0:03:53.360 --> 0:03:56.920
<v Speaker 6>the revenue still comes from core PCs. And even though

0:03:56.920 --> 0:04:02.120
<v Speaker 6>it's a saturated market, the AIVA will help spur refreshed

0:04:02.120 --> 0:04:04.080
<v Speaker 6>cycle at some point. We don't know it's going to

0:04:04.120 --> 0:04:06.800
<v Speaker 6>be first half or second half, but it will come.

0:04:07.240 --> 0:04:08.800
<v Speaker 3>And it will come under new leadership.

0:04:09.040 --> 0:04:11.520
<v Speaker 4>Mande Singh, We thank you so much on all things

0:04:11.600 --> 0:04:13.520
<v Speaker 4>Intel will have plenty more of that in a moment.

0:04:13.560 --> 0:04:15.480
<v Speaker 4>But let's just talk a little bit more about the

0:04:15.600 --> 0:04:19.080
<v Speaker 4>US focus on chips, because the Biden administration unveiled new

0:04:19.120 --> 0:04:22.320
<v Speaker 4>restrictions on China's access to vital components for chips and

0:04:22.440 --> 0:04:26.600
<v Speaker 4>artificial intelligence, and the Department of Commerce slapping additional curbs

0:04:26.600 --> 0:04:29.440
<v Speaker 4>on the sale of high bandwidth memory and chip making gear.

0:04:29.600 --> 0:04:32.400
<v Speaker 4>It's impacting twenty seven types of chip design and fabrication tools.

0:04:32.440 --> 0:04:35.239
<v Speaker 4>It's also blacklisted one hundred and forty more Chinese entities

0:04:35.520 --> 0:04:37.960
<v Speaker 4>than it accused of acting on Beijing's behalf. Blomberg's and

0:04:38.000 --> 0:04:41.760
<v Speaker 4>mackenzie Hawkins had a busy Thanksgiving period reporting all this out.

0:04:41.800 --> 0:04:44.640
<v Speaker 4>McKenzie and just go first and foremost as to whether

0:04:44.680 --> 0:04:48.200
<v Speaker 4>this actually looked perhaps slightly better to the market than

0:04:48.240 --> 0:04:49.320
<v Speaker 4>some had anticipated.

0:04:51.200 --> 0:04:53.920
<v Speaker 7>So this is what's become kind of the third annual

0:04:54.000 --> 0:04:57.040
<v Speaker 7>update to these sweeping outport controls of the Biden administration

0:04:57.120 --> 0:04:59.360
<v Speaker 7>has levied on companies trying to sell chips and chip

0:04:59.360 --> 0:05:02.520
<v Speaker 7>making gear to China. But the latest controls, which were

0:05:02.560 --> 0:05:06.480
<v Speaker 7>unveiled this morning, came in slightly softer than some proposals

0:05:06.520 --> 0:05:09.720
<v Speaker 7>that officials had floated earlier this year. They didn't sanction

0:05:09.880 --> 0:05:12.720
<v Speaker 7>a handful of key Chinese companies with ties to Huawei

0:05:12.800 --> 0:05:16.479
<v Speaker 7>that they had discussed sanctioning, and they also exempted important allies,

0:05:16.600 --> 0:05:18.920
<v Speaker 7>notably Japan and the Netherlands, which are home to of

0:05:19.000 --> 0:05:22.400
<v Speaker 7>the most important ship tool making companies, from rules that

0:05:22.520 --> 0:05:25.120
<v Speaker 7>restrict additional types of chip making gear from being sent

0:05:25.160 --> 0:05:26.520
<v Speaker 7>to China.

0:05:26.560 --> 0:05:30.279
<v Speaker 4>All of this context is the US trying to limit

0:05:30.440 --> 0:05:33.920
<v Speaker 4>capabilities over in China, trying to home grow a supply

0:05:34.040 --> 0:05:36.920
<v Speaker 4>chain here in the United States, which does involve Intel

0:05:37.040 --> 0:05:39.279
<v Speaker 4>just going back to that story of the day, mackenzie,

0:05:39.360 --> 0:05:41.240
<v Speaker 4>how much do you think the US government is going

0:05:41.320 --> 0:05:44.400
<v Speaker 4>to be upended by change of leadership? How much has

0:05:44.440 --> 0:05:46.560
<v Speaker 4>Intel benefited from the CHIPSACK for example.

0:05:48.279 --> 0:05:52.400
<v Speaker 7>So Intel actually last week solidified a deal for seven

0:05:52.440 --> 0:05:55.159
<v Speaker 7>point eight billion dollars in funding from the CHIPSAC, which

0:05:55.160 --> 0:05:57.920
<v Speaker 7>is this broader fifty two billion dollar program to bring

0:05:58.000 --> 0:06:00.840
<v Speaker 7>chip manufacturing back to the United States. The company i

0:06:00.880 --> 0:06:03.480
<v Speaker 7>said it's committed to its US expansion plans, which include

0:06:03.520 --> 0:06:06.599
<v Speaker 7>more than one hundred billion dollars in investment, ninety billion

0:06:06.600 --> 0:06:08.239
<v Speaker 7>of which will come by the end of the decade,

0:06:08.640 --> 0:06:12.359
<v Speaker 7>and plans to execute on factories in Arizona, Ohio, Oregon,

0:06:12.440 --> 0:06:16.920
<v Speaker 7>and New Mexico. Galsinger's departure shouldn't change the company's plans

0:06:16.960 --> 0:06:18.760
<v Speaker 7>as we see it now, but of course a new

0:06:18.800 --> 0:06:21.560
<v Speaker 7>CEO will have to decide whether to pursue options that

0:06:21.600 --> 0:06:24.760
<v Speaker 7>Galsinger had left off the table, and the US government

0:06:24.800 --> 0:06:25.640
<v Speaker 7>we're watching that closely.

0:06:26.120 --> 0:06:29.400
<v Speaker 4>They will be McKenzie Hawkins, thanks for breaking it all down. Meanwhile,

0:06:29.400 --> 0:06:33.120
<v Speaker 4>we want to get the whole circumference of the chip

0:06:33.160 --> 0:06:36.040
<v Speaker 4>sector for you now with Pierre Faragu from New Street Research.

0:06:36.120 --> 0:06:40.560
<v Speaker 4>Your first take on the announcement of Pat Gelsinger retiring.

0:06:40.560 --> 0:06:41.359
<v Speaker 3>Were you surprised?

0:06:42.480 --> 0:06:46.320
<v Speaker 8>I was very surprised by the abrupt news, like retiring today.

0:06:46.360 --> 0:06:51.359
<v Speaker 8>It is no transition period, so difficult, a difficult situation.

0:06:51.480 --> 0:06:54.960
<v Speaker 8>We knew the board was stands since the summer urum

0:06:55.000 --> 0:06:59.719
<v Speaker 8>early and the CEO of Cadence resigned from the board

0:06:59.760 --> 0:07:03.320
<v Speaker 8>of over the summer, and it was like reflecting like

0:07:03.360 --> 0:07:06.919
<v Speaker 8>difficult conversations. And so it probably looks like, you know,

0:07:07.480 --> 0:07:11.160
<v Speaker 8>Pat loss the continents of the board or didn't get

0:07:11.160 --> 0:07:13.280
<v Speaker 8>the support of the boat for his strategy anymore. And

0:07:14.040 --> 0:07:18.560
<v Speaker 8>basically probably and uh decided to leave abruptly. So so

0:07:18.600 --> 0:07:20.840
<v Speaker 8>that was a surprise now that you know, we are

0:07:20.840 --> 0:07:26.480
<v Speaker 8>four years into the turnaround. Bad direction was let's double

0:07:26.560 --> 0:07:29.920
<v Speaker 8>down and Intel's capabilities in manufacturing. Let's make Intel like

0:07:29.960 --> 0:07:35.760
<v Speaker 8>a leading manufacturer. Let's go large, Uh, you know, go

0:07:36.280 --> 0:07:39.240
<v Speaker 8>big and you know, leverage at a maximum. The political

0:07:39.280 --> 0:07:42.880
<v Speaker 8>support will have to do that. So that was the plan.

0:07:42.960 --> 0:07:47.760
<v Speaker 8>And the plan failed basically because TSMC's model cannot be

0:07:47.960 --> 0:07:51.280
<v Speaker 8>competed against. I think it's that's so we've had from

0:07:51.320 --> 0:07:55.280
<v Speaker 8>the beginning, so Intel being able to preserve manufacturing capabilities yes,

0:07:55.760 --> 0:07:59.559
<v Speaker 8>Intel being like a scalable like like a large scale

0:07:59.600 --> 0:08:05.120
<v Speaker 8>competitor to TSMC is probably not possible for like scale

0:08:05.200 --> 0:08:09.560
<v Speaker 8>and experience reasons, and that's why things failed.

0:08:10.960 --> 0:08:14.520
<v Speaker 4>In August on that very bleak announcement of numbers that

0:08:14.560 --> 0:08:17.880
<v Speaker 4>we had and ish disastrous sell off in the shares.

0:08:18.440 --> 0:08:19.520
<v Speaker 3>Was this restructuring.

0:08:19.560 --> 0:08:21.440
<v Speaker 4>It involved a lot of job losses, but it did

0:08:21.520 --> 0:08:24.480
<v Speaker 4>involve also the sort of peeling away of the foundry

0:08:24.480 --> 0:08:27.320
<v Speaker 4>business to be able to be managed sort of separately

0:08:27.360 --> 0:08:30.880
<v Speaker 4>but alongside Intel. Does that stay or do we start

0:08:30.880 --> 0:08:34.680
<v Speaker 4>to see actual purchasing coming from well with the reports

0:08:34.679 --> 0:08:38.359
<v Speaker 4>previously of Qualcom being interested even the chip designer.

0:08:38.080 --> 0:08:42.559
<v Speaker 8>ARM So the situation is going to be very very

0:08:42.600 --> 0:08:45.920
<v Speaker 8>fluid for quite some time for sure. As you mentioned

0:08:45.960 --> 0:08:49.680
<v Speaker 8>last summer, you know, the word was say to be

0:08:49.720 --> 0:08:55.120
<v Speaker 8>fighting of you know, activist activist Shoulder is getting prepared

0:08:55.160 --> 0:09:01.880
<v Speaker 8>to fight of activity smooth. The stitution is of course

0:09:01.960 --> 0:09:07.040
<v Speaker 8>very complex. On one hand, Intel has manufacturing capabilities. Intel

0:09:07.080 --> 0:09:13.320
<v Speaker 8>has manufacturing capabilities onshore and owned buy like a US

0:09:13.480 --> 0:09:16.560
<v Speaker 8>control company. So it's a very very unique asset, extremely

0:09:16.640 --> 0:09:20.920
<v Speaker 8>valuable in today's cheer political context, and I think Intel

0:09:20.960 --> 0:09:24.160
<v Speaker 8>needs to continue to be able to to build on that.

0:09:24.400 --> 0:09:26.720
<v Speaker 8>So of course there is a tempting, tempting route, which

0:09:26.760 --> 0:09:29.120
<v Speaker 8>is to say, okay, maybe Quale common Intel could merge

0:09:29.200 --> 0:09:32.880
<v Speaker 8>or Qualcome to biot Intel or try and trigger the

0:09:32.880 --> 0:09:36.760
<v Speaker 8>consolidation of that type. I don't see that as good

0:09:37.080 --> 0:09:40.439
<v Speaker 8>as a good opportunity. It's difficult to generate synergies between

0:09:40.480 --> 0:09:44.240
<v Speaker 8>Quale governing Intel. The chips qual Come do are very

0:09:44.240 --> 0:09:49.319
<v Speaker 8>different from the Intel ships. Manufacturing is a complex business,

0:09:49.360 --> 0:09:53.720
<v Speaker 8>so I'm not super you know, that's an area that

0:09:53.840 --> 0:09:55.280
<v Speaker 8>scares me more than anything else.

0:09:55.320 --> 0:09:56.520
<v Speaker 7>You know, bad many.

0:09:56.320 --> 0:10:00.400
<v Speaker 8>Decisions typically can arrive in a situation like that. What's

0:10:00.440 --> 0:10:02.640
<v Speaker 8>more interesting, I think is to be like, okay, how

0:10:02.640 --> 0:10:06.600
<v Speaker 8>can we make sure we create a sustainable US owned

0:10:06.720 --> 0:10:10.640
<v Speaker 8>on us SO manufacturing capability. And if you do that,

0:10:10.800 --> 0:10:12.599
<v Speaker 8>you have quody to admit that you're not going to

0:10:12.640 --> 0:10:15.720
<v Speaker 8>compete with TSMC. You need to partner with TSMC, right,

0:10:16.880 --> 0:10:19.160
<v Speaker 8>you need to find other very large partners that are

0:10:19.160 --> 0:10:20.839
<v Speaker 8>going to super oft to And of course the one

0:10:20.880 --> 0:10:23.719
<v Speaker 8>that comes to mind that has that those maybe to

0:10:24.360 --> 0:10:27.480
<v Speaker 8>the US is in video. So you know, like Engagent

0:10:27.520 --> 0:10:31.360
<v Speaker 8>partnering around manufacturing with TSMC as a partner and Vidia

0:10:31.360 --> 0:10:34.240
<v Speaker 8>as a partner would be a much more interesting route

0:10:34.240 --> 0:10:35.160
<v Speaker 8>to pursue from here.

0:10:35.679 --> 0:10:39.360
<v Speaker 4>There is ongoing breaking news around this story and Bloomberg

0:10:39.440 --> 0:10:42.400
<v Speaker 4>leading the charge with how Pat Gilsinger was inteed forced

0:10:42.400 --> 0:10:46.400
<v Speaker 4>out after the board grew frustrated. The biggest frustration Pier

0:10:46.720 --> 0:10:50.760
<v Speaker 4>was that they missed the AI evolution jumping on and

0:10:50.800 --> 0:10:53.319
<v Speaker 4>being able to ensure that what they produced, which.

0:10:53.160 --> 0:10:55.319
<v Speaker 3>Is GOWI, was able to compete.

0:10:55.559 --> 0:10:58.000
<v Speaker 4>I mean, they're likely to miss that five hundred million

0:10:58.040 --> 0:11:00.839
<v Speaker 4>dollar target for this year when very is busily making

0:11:00.840 --> 0:11:02.079
<v Speaker 4>about one hundred billion a year.

0:11:04.200 --> 0:11:07.319
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, I think it's the frustration came from the lack

0:11:07.400 --> 0:11:11.960
<v Speaker 8>of prudence of the initial plan going to be too large,

0:11:12.760 --> 0:11:15.439
<v Speaker 8>assuming you know, demand would follow as long as you

0:11:15.920 --> 0:11:20.800
<v Speaker 8>can pull together like quality, quality, supply. And yes, the

0:11:20.880 --> 0:11:27.520
<v Speaker 8>underlying causes that uh Intel ended up not being in

0:11:27.600 --> 0:11:30.720
<v Speaker 8>the growing part of the market, and namely it was

0:11:31.640 --> 0:11:36.920
<v Speaker 8>last summer was particularly abrupt, like you see, like the

0:11:37.080 --> 0:11:40.880
<v Speaker 8>complete failure of the Intel AI chips and the fact

0:11:40.920 --> 0:11:42.720
<v Speaker 8>that they would not be at all in the market.

0:11:43.280 --> 0:11:48.199
<v Speaker 8>Him is actually carving out a fairly sustainable niche positioning

0:11:48.240 --> 0:11:50.880
<v Speaker 8>in that market. So that was part of it, But

0:11:50.920 --> 0:11:55.199
<v Speaker 8>I think part probably stuck too much to his initial

0:11:55.240 --> 0:11:58.000
<v Speaker 8>plan with like a very ambitious, very large scale plan

0:11:59.080 --> 0:12:02.600
<v Speaker 8>and should have a year or eighteen months ago thought

0:12:02.679 --> 0:12:06.840
<v Speaker 8>about like you know, changing tag to smaller and more

0:12:06.840 --> 0:12:09.520
<v Speaker 8>colarborative with other players in the market.

0:12:09.600 --> 0:12:13.960
<v Speaker 4>Because yeah, Peah, I mean much of this predated the

0:12:14.000 --> 0:12:16.800
<v Speaker 4>pack coming back in twenty twenty one. That course was

0:12:16.840 --> 0:12:20.160
<v Speaker 4>already kind of paved, and he didn't reorientate quickly enough.

0:12:20.600 --> 0:12:23.360
<v Speaker 4>Where now in terms of leadership and in terms of

0:12:23.440 --> 0:12:26.160
<v Speaker 4>Intel's place in the ecosystem very quickly, please.

0:12:27.120 --> 0:12:31.240
<v Speaker 8>So I think INTE could be specialized in manufacturing in

0:12:31.280 --> 0:12:38.200
<v Speaker 8>the US under US control and ownership and collaborate with

0:12:38.280 --> 0:12:41.600
<v Speaker 8>the rest of the industry instead of instead of competing,

0:12:41.640 --> 0:12:46.840
<v Speaker 8>I think in like smaller scale, remaining like keeping a

0:12:46.840 --> 0:12:49.320
<v Speaker 8>position at the leading edge and leveraging the products of

0:12:49.400 --> 0:12:51.800
<v Speaker 8>Intel like the PC ships and the servitude that are

0:12:51.800 --> 0:12:53.920
<v Speaker 8>still very good and in very high demand.

0:12:54.200 --> 0:12:57.880
<v Speaker 4>Right, Yeah, thank you so much for lending your expertise today,

0:12:57.880 --> 0:13:00.120
<v Speaker 4>Pierre for Ago on New Street research and all things

0:13:00.120 --> 0:13:03.040
<v Speaker 4>intell and chips. Meanwhile, sticking with the error of AI,

0:13:03.880 --> 0:13:06.880
<v Speaker 4>shares of super Micro absolutely soaring today. The company says

0:13:07.200 --> 0:13:10.000
<v Speaker 4>that an external review of its business found no evidence

0:13:10.040 --> 0:13:12.480
<v Speaker 4>of wrongdoing and the company will appoint a new CFO.

0:13:12.559 --> 0:13:14.800
<v Speaker 4>This follows, of course, that tumultuous year for super Micro,

0:13:14.880 --> 0:13:18.600
<v Speaker 4>which is also facing USDOJ probe following a report from

0:13:18.640 --> 0:13:21.720
<v Speaker 4>short seller Hindenburg Research. This, of course, is a company

0:13:21.760 --> 0:13:24.319
<v Speaker 4>that uses in video chips within its servers that it

0:13:24.400 --> 0:13:26.920
<v Speaker 4>sells on two key clients for up thirteen fourteen percent

0:13:27.120 --> 0:13:29.120
<v Speaker 4>over the last two training days. Meanwhile, coming up, we're

0:13:29.120 --> 0:13:31.120
<v Speaker 4>going to break down the Black Friday sales data and

0:13:31.240 --> 0:13:34.880
<v Speaker 4>trends for Cyber Monday. Mick max Richel topograph stick with us.

0:13:34.880 --> 0:13:48.079
<v Speaker 4>There's a bluebog technology. Of course, Today is Cyber Monday,

0:13:48.240 --> 0:13:51.160
<v Speaker 4>and Adobe expects consumers will spend a record thirteen point

0:13:51.160 --> 0:13:54.920
<v Speaker 4>two billion dollars, up six percent year on year. Online

0:13:54.960 --> 0:13:57.959
<v Speaker 4>spending is expected to peak, especially between eight and ten

0:13:58.040 --> 0:14:01.400
<v Speaker 4>pm later tonight, with fifteen point seven million dollars spent

0:14:01.520 --> 0:14:02.600
<v Speaker 4>every single minute.

0:14:02.600 --> 0:14:03.280
<v Speaker 3>That's Eastern time.

0:14:03.280 --> 0:14:05.240
<v Speaker 4>Of course, let's look at all of that Anergy, what

0:14:05.320 --> 0:14:06.960
<v Speaker 4>happened on Black Friday and the weekend?

0:14:07.040 --> 0:14:09.080
<v Speaker 3>Rachel tipographs with US founder and c here mcmack.

0:14:09.200 --> 0:14:12.000
<v Speaker 4>It's an e commerce marketing platform for multi channel brands.

0:14:12.360 --> 0:14:14.400
<v Speaker 4>It feels like a big year I'm certainly getting hit

0:14:14.400 --> 0:14:16.000
<v Speaker 4>with a lot of marketing. Is it feeling that way

0:14:16.000 --> 0:14:16.200
<v Speaker 4>for you?

0:14:16.320 --> 0:14:16.640
<v Speaker 3>Rachel?

0:14:18.840 --> 0:14:19.280
<v Speaker 4>It is.

0:14:19.520 --> 0:14:22.240
<v Speaker 9>You know, despite what's happening in the economy, consumers are

0:14:22.280 --> 0:14:24.880
<v Speaker 9>showing up to really save I want to say spend,

0:14:24.960 --> 0:14:26.680
<v Speaker 9>but it's really about savings right now.

0:14:27.080 --> 0:14:28.000
<v Speaker 3>Okay, that's interesting.

0:14:28.040 --> 0:14:30.120
<v Speaker 4>So it's more about the deal making and how are

0:14:30.200 --> 0:14:33.680
<v Speaker 4>companies managing to access those consumers right now? What innovative

0:14:33.680 --> 0:14:41.160
<v Speaker 4>ways are they using to market across various platforms. Oh,

0:14:41.240 --> 0:14:42.680
<v Speaker 4>do we have some technological issues?

0:14:42.760 --> 0:14:43.000
<v Speaker 3>Rachel?

0:14:43.000 --> 0:14:46.160
<v Speaker 9>Absolutely? You know, when we look at what happened from

0:14:46.480 --> 0:14:49.440
<v Speaker 9>stinks hello, can you hear me?

0:14:50.480 --> 0:14:53.440
<v Speaker 4>Apologies, there's a big delay, Rachel, Do carry on?

0:14:54.320 --> 0:15:00.120
<v Speaker 9>Hello. When you look at what happened between things thank

0:15:00.240 --> 0:15:04.280
<v Speaker 9>Giving and Sunday, the majority of traffic came from social,

0:15:05.240 --> 0:15:09.760
<v Speaker 9>Meta being number one, TikTok being number two, and YouTube

0:15:09.800 --> 0:15:14.000
<v Speaker 9>being number three. If we were looking at results from Gear,

0:15:14.400 --> 0:15:17.560
<v Speaker 9>YouTube wouldn't have made the top three. What's really clear

0:15:17.680 --> 0:15:21.200
<v Speaker 9>right now is brands are recognizing that social is the

0:15:21.240 --> 0:15:26.640
<v Speaker 9>third shelf and wherever short video and creators are, that's

0:15:26.680 --> 0:15:29.920
<v Speaker 9>where brands are investing their dollars in their time to

0:15:30.120 --> 0:15:33.600
<v Speaker 9>gain mind share to then drive traffic to their Black

0:15:33.600 --> 0:15:34.840
<v Speaker 9>Friday deals.

0:15:35.880 --> 0:15:40.040
<v Speaker 4>How Rachel all the companies that are doing well, the

0:15:40.240 --> 0:15:42.320
<v Speaker 4>likes of Walmot we sold release stealing a lot of

0:15:42.400 --> 0:15:45.000
<v Speaker 4>the marketshed and the targets, how are they tracking it?

0:15:45.080 --> 0:15:47.280
<v Speaker 4>How are they making sure that they've got the measurements

0:15:47.720 --> 0:15:50.000
<v Speaker 4>that proves that the investment's making sense to them?

0:15:54.040 --> 0:15:56.920
<v Speaker 9>Absolutely. I mean, if you look at Amazon's earnings or

0:15:56.960 --> 0:16:00.640
<v Speaker 9>Walmart's earnings, it's very clear that these reach tailors are

0:16:00.680 --> 0:16:04.560
<v Speaker 9>now becoming data businesses. They're making eighty to ninety percent

0:16:04.960 --> 0:16:08.000
<v Speaker 9>margins on selling data as a service, and we all

0:16:08.040 --> 0:16:11.640
<v Speaker 9>know they're not making those margins on selling physical goods.

0:16:12.320 --> 0:16:16.200
<v Speaker 9>So when it comes to measurement, major brands are first

0:16:16.240 --> 0:16:20.280
<v Speaker 9>relying on retailer's first party data, but then they have

0:16:20.360 --> 0:16:23.000
<v Speaker 9>to marry that to third party sources because we can't

0:16:23.040 --> 0:16:25.800
<v Speaker 9>all be grading our own homework. So they're turning to

0:16:25.840 --> 0:16:29.560
<v Speaker 9>companies like Mickmac, Adobe Circana, which was the merger of

0:16:29.600 --> 0:16:34.560
<v Speaker 9>Iri NPD to really validate what's happening between Mickmac's data

0:16:34.600 --> 0:16:37.080
<v Speaker 9>and Adobe's data. We're pretty much seeing the same thing.

0:16:37.640 --> 0:16:41.560
<v Speaker 9>In Mickmac. We've seen a one percent one percent increase

0:16:41.640 --> 0:16:45.400
<v Speaker 9>in conversion rates during the Black Friday weekend this year

0:16:45.520 --> 0:16:48.840
<v Speaker 9>compared to last year. If you extrapolate that to what

0:16:48.880 --> 0:16:52.320
<v Speaker 9>Adobe seeing Adobe sawn increase in a billion dollars in revenue,

0:16:52.680 --> 0:16:56.720
<v Speaker 9>that one percent increase in conversision rate marries that one

0:16:56.840 --> 0:17:00.720
<v Speaker 9>billion dollar increase in revenue. So by marrying moremultiple sources

0:17:00.720 --> 0:17:02.840
<v Speaker 9>of truth, we can all start to see the picture

0:17:03.160 --> 0:17:06.040
<v Speaker 9>that consumers showed up. They were really choosy with their

0:17:06.160 --> 0:17:09.399
<v Speaker 9>dollars and they turned to places like Walmart because that's

0:17:09.480 --> 0:17:12.159
<v Speaker 9>where the value is and that's also where breadth of

0:17:12.240 --> 0:17:14.320
<v Speaker 9>merchandise is this holiday season.

0:17:15.320 --> 0:17:16.880
<v Speaker 3>One stop shop is what people are liking.

0:17:16.960 --> 0:17:19.160
<v Speaker 4>Rachel topograph for me, Thank you so much for the expertise,

0:17:19.200 --> 0:17:20.320
<v Speaker 4>CEO of Mick Mac.

0:17:27.920 --> 0:17:30.520
<v Speaker 3>Time now for talking tech. First up, five Canadian news

0:17:30.600 --> 0:17:32.119
<v Speaker 3>media publishers.

0:17:32.280 --> 0:17:35.479
<v Speaker 4>They've sued open ai for breaching copyright, alleging the company

0:17:35.640 --> 0:17:38.639
<v Speaker 4>scraps content to train its AI products. According to an

0:17:38.680 --> 0:17:42.880
<v Speaker 4>open ai spokesperson, is models are trained unquote publicly available data.

0:17:42.640 --> 0:17:44.240
<v Speaker 3>Grounded in fair use.

0:17:44.760 --> 0:17:47.639
<v Speaker 4>Plus Elil Musk has asked a federal court to block

0:17:47.680 --> 0:17:51.199
<v Speaker 4>open ai from pursuing an illegal quote conversion to a

0:17:51.240 --> 0:17:55.520
<v Speaker 4>for profit business. In his latest court filing, Musk repeated

0:17:55.560 --> 0:17:57.960
<v Speaker 4>earlier claims that open Ai broke its promise to him

0:17:58.000 --> 0:18:01.159
<v Speaker 4>and abandoned its founding purpose as a charity, and it

0:18:01.240 --> 0:18:04.320
<v Speaker 4>accepted backing for Microsoft back in twenty nineteen. And In

0:18:04.400 --> 0:18:06.640
<v Speaker 4>Video CEO Jenson Wang is set to meet the Thai

0:18:06.720 --> 0:18:09.400
<v Speaker 4>Prime Minister on Tuesday. The two were expected to discuss

0:18:09.560 --> 0:18:13.240
<v Speaker 4>investment plans and cooperation within the Thai government. The meeting

0:18:13.280 --> 0:18:15.879
<v Speaker 4>comes after and Video announced a buildout of AI data

0:18:15.880 --> 0:18:20.720
<v Speaker 4>centers and manufacturing in Thailand back in October. Now, sticking

0:18:20.760 --> 0:18:23.119
<v Speaker 4>with all things Asia, and let's just talk about China

0:18:23.160 --> 0:18:26.840
<v Speaker 4>and ev makers, in particular Tesla BUYD. We're getting data

0:18:26.880 --> 0:18:30.480
<v Speaker 4>that they've unleashed even more discounts and incentives in China.

0:18:30.600 --> 0:18:32.920
<v Speaker 4>This is a final push to meet annual sales targets.

0:18:33.200 --> 0:18:36.159
<v Speaker 4>Let's break down with Bloomberg's David Welch and look what

0:18:36.200 --> 0:18:39.320
<v Speaker 4>are we getting on offer here in China.

0:18:39.440 --> 0:18:42.440
<v Speaker 2>I think they've been fighting for market share all year long,

0:18:42.480 --> 0:18:44.600
<v Speaker 2>and now everyone's trying to hit their sales goals as

0:18:44.640 --> 0:18:47.439
<v Speaker 2>we get into the last month. So reminds me when

0:18:47.480 --> 0:18:49.800
<v Speaker 2>I looked at some of these deals as Toyota's December,

0:18:49.800 --> 0:18:51.840
<v Speaker 2>to remember that they have every year in the US,

0:18:51.880 --> 0:18:54.760
<v Speaker 2>but this is electric vehicles in China, so zero percent

0:18:54.840 --> 0:18:58.159
<v Speaker 2>plus rebates on some Tesla models. They'd already announced some

0:18:58.200 --> 0:19:01.879
<v Speaker 2>discounts last week, and I think model why BYD has

0:19:01.920 --> 0:19:05.320
<v Speaker 2>been doing this for a while, basically launching a price

0:19:05.359 --> 0:19:08.520
<v Speaker 2>war to put pressure on their competitors gain market share.

0:19:08.880 --> 0:19:11.960
<v Speaker 2>Byd is one of the few EV makers in China.

0:19:12.040 --> 0:19:15.080
<v Speaker 2>The Chinese makes that is that even makes money, so

0:19:15.320 --> 0:19:17.000
<v Speaker 2>it's going to put a lot of pressure on its

0:19:17.080 --> 0:19:20.359
<v Speaker 2>domestic rivals. And then look, Tesla's trying to hang in

0:19:20.400 --> 0:19:23.040
<v Speaker 2>there in a tough market for foreign auto makers, so

0:19:23.400 --> 0:19:25.080
<v Speaker 2>they want to keep the market share up and they

0:19:25.080 --> 0:19:28.320
<v Speaker 2>want to keep the cars moving too, So very good

0:19:28.320 --> 0:19:30.399
<v Speaker 2>deals if you're looking for an EV in China right now,

0:19:30.480 --> 0:19:32.320
<v Speaker 2>and you're seeing some of that in the US as well.

0:19:33.320 --> 0:19:36.679
<v Speaker 4>In the US, maybe some very reasonably priced zero percent

0:19:36.760 --> 0:19:38.199
<v Speaker 4>loans that are going on if you want to be

0:19:38.240 --> 0:19:39.640
<v Speaker 4>making purchases in evs.

0:19:40.480 --> 0:19:42.800
<v Speaker 3>There are new entrants as well within China.

0:19:42.960 --> 0:19:46.320
<v Speaker 4>Shoomi, for example, has made real inroads into the EV market.

0:19:46.720 --> 0:19:50.000
<v Speaker 4>Tesla is dependent on China in many ways, and many

0:19:50.040 --> 0:19:52.680
<v Speaker 4>wonder whether they're going to make their fourth quarter targets

0:19:52.720 --> 0:19:53.720
<v Speaker 4>in terms of sales.

0:19:54.359 --> 0:19:56.680
<v Speaker 3>How difficult is it to navigate China?

0:19:58.359 --> 0:20:00.840
<v Speaker 2>Very tough right now, especially if you're a foreign automaker

0:20:00.960 --> 0:20:03.119
<v Speaker 2>foreign to the Chinese market. The Europeans have had a

0:20:03.160 --> 0:20:06.719
<v Speaker 2>tough time there, so as General Motors, Tesla is trying

0:20:06.720 --> 0:20:09.919
<v Speaker 2>to really stay in the game and they're having to discount.

0:20:10.720 --> 0:20:12.879
<v Speaker 2>One of the reasons you're seeing other car companies like

0:20:12.960 --> 0:20:16.080
<v Speaker 2>General Motors and Volkswagen struggle is they're not as willing

0:20:16.480 --> 0:20:18.919
<v Speaker 2>to discount and sell cars at a loss as the

0:20:18.960 --> 0:20:22.399
<v Speaker 2>domestic producers are. And BYD is driving a lot of

0:20:22.400 --> 0:20:25.800
<v Speaker 2>this because they're huge, they're profitable, they're trying to grow

0:20:25.840 --> 0:20:28.400
<v Speaker 2>all over the world. They've got lower costs, so they're

0:20:28.440 --> 0:20:31.840
<v Speaker 2>able to do it in a lot of ways. And

0:20:32.119 --> 0:20:34.520
<v Speaker 2>you know, there's a bit of a Darwinian game playing

0:20:34.520 --> 0:20:37.239
<v Speaker 2>out in China where the top domestic producers who can

0:20:37.280 --> 0:20:39.399
<v Speaker 2>afford a discount are going to go for market share,

0:20:39.720 --> 0:20:42.439
<v Speaker 2>go for overall size and scale and push some of

0:20:42.440 --> 0:20:45.000
<v Speaker 2>the others, whether they be American and German companies or

0:20:45.000 --> 0:20:49.600
<v Speaker 2>even Tesla itself or some of their own Chinese domestic competitors,

0:20:49.680 --> 0:20:52.360
<v Speaker 2>push them out of business or into downsizing, so they

0:20:52.440 --> 0:20:55.960
<v Speaker 2>just dominate the market. One day. They're already pretty big

0:20:56.000 --> 0:20:58.040
<v Speaker 2>and they just want to be the player in the country.

0:20:58.640 --> 0:21:02.000
<v Speaker 4>Evan Wilch with a pretty brutal help look on evs

0:21:02.000 --> 0:21:02.680
<v Speaker 4>over in China.

0:21:02.760 --> 0:21:03.520
<v Speaker 3>Thank you so much.

0:21:03.600 --> 0:21:07.399
<v Speaker 4>Meanwhile, let's talk about one key carmaker. Stellantis has left

0:21:07.440 --> 0:21:10.600
<v Speaker 4>without clear leadership after a surprise departure from its CEO,

0:21:10.680 --> 0:21:14.119
<v Speaker 4>Carlos Tever's, which was supported earlier by BlueBag News. This

0:21:14.200 --> 0:21:16.639
<v Speaker 4>comes at a time when Stalantis is under pressure to

0:21:16.840 --> 0:21:20.200
<v Speaker 4>halt a sales slide in the US. It's also struggled

0:21:20.240 --> 0:21:22.879
<v Speaker 4>with the European market, where demand for EBS is waning.

0:21:22.960 --> 0:21:25.359
<v Speaker 4>Just as we're just talking about Chinese manufacturers to span

0:21:25.920 --> 0:21:29.080
<v Speaker 4>in the region. Remember they are key when it comes

0:21:29.160 --> 0:21:39.840
<v Speaker 4>to the likes of Fiat and Jeep. Welcome back to

0:21:39.880 --> 0:21:42.320
<v Speaker 4>Blue Meg Technology and Caroline Hide in New York. Let's

0:21:42.359 --> 0:21:44.800
<v Speaker 4>get a quick check on these markets, and let's focus

0:21:44.880 --> 0:21:46.879
<v Speaker 4>in on what's happening when it comes to chips. The

0:21:47.000 --> 0:21:49.360
<v Speaker 4>key story of the day a five percent rise in Intel,

0:21:49.440 --> 0:21:52.800
<v Speaker 4>as the CEO, Pat Gelsinger, hired back in twenty twenty

0:21:52.800 --> 0:21:56.160
<v Speaker 4>one to turn around this iconic chip maker will leave

0:21:56.200 --> 0:21:59.199
<v Speaker 4>the job as that turnaround has thus far failed and

0:21:59.200 --> 0:22:02.280
<v Speaker 4>he's lost the confidence of the board. According to Bloomberg reporting,

0:22:02.440 --> 0:22:05.560
<v Speaker 4>in Vidia is up five ten percent. Look under his tenure.

0:22:05.640 --> 0:22:09.280
<v Speaker 4>It's twenty twenty one at Intel. Intel shares dropped sixty percent,

0:22:09.320 --> 0:22:12.840
<v Speaker 4>in Videa's shares rows eight hundred percent. We shine a

0:22:12.880 --> 0:22:14.600
<v Speaker 4>light on what's happening with the chip sector more broadly.

0:22:14.640 --> 0:22:16.240
<v Speaker 4>We're up two and a half percent on the socks,

0:22:16.960 --> 0:22:19.480
<v Speaker 4>and let's just shift gears a little bit talk chips

0:22:19.480 --> 0:22:22.440
<v Speaker 4>more broadly and how there's some new entrance into the

0:22:22.480 --> 0:22:24.920
<v Speaker 4>AI part of the equation. Jeff Bezos, for example, and

0:22:25.000 --> 0:22:28.440
<v Speaker 4>Samsung are betting big on AI chip startup ten Storrant

0:22:28.640 --> 0:22:31.040
<v Speaker 4>announcing a seven hundred million dollar investment, which puts the

0:22:31.080 --> 0:22:33.160
<v Speaker 4>company now on a two point six billion dollar valuation.

0:22:33.640 --> 0:22:36.040
<v Speaker 4>Joining us to discuss is the CEO of the company,

0:22:36.119 --> 0:22:39.200
<v Speaker 4>Jim Keller, who is himself a legend and chip making world.

0:22:39.560 --> 0:22:43.000
<v Speaker 4>Of course, your resume includes know who's who of AMD, Apple,

0:22:43.040 --> 0:22:46.800
<v Speaker 4>Tesla and indeed Intel. Jim, the money that you're raising,

0:22:47.000 --> 0:22:48.960
<v Speaker 4>what is it that you're hoping to do? You're wanting

0:22:49.000 --> 0:22:52.080
<v Speaker 4>to make a more cheaper operation and option out there

0:22:52.400 --> 0:22:54.040
<v Speaker 4>for AI accelerator chips.

0:22:55.080 --> 0:22:57.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's right. We're building out the team, we're building

0:22:57.960 --> 0:23:01.040
<v Speaker 1>out our products. We're starting the ship our products, and

0:23:01.080 --> 0:23:03.520
<v Speaker 1>our real mission right now is to bring on developers

0:23:03.560 --> 0:23:05.000
<v Speaker 1>and early customers.

0:23:05.640 --> 0:23:07.960
<v Speaker 4>Let's talk about the customers and what you offer that

0:23:08.080 --> 0:23:09.240
<v Speaker 4>isn't in the market at the moment.

0:23:09.320 --> 0:23:10.479
<v Speaker 3>Jim, what's your selling point?

0:23:11.400 --> 0:23:13.959
<v Speaker 1>Well, we have a couple of things we license our

0:23:14.000 --> 0:23:16.640
<v Speaker 1>IP and we're building a business on that for both

0:23:16.720 --> 0:23:21.360
<v Speaker 1>risk ICPU and AI. We're selling low cost development systems

0:23:21.720 --> 0:23:24.399
<v Speaker 1>like I'm really interested in hitting a much lower cost point.

0:23:25.040 --> 0:23:28.040
<v Speaker 1>And then we open source to our whole AI compiler

0:23:28.080 --> 0:23:31.560
<v Speaker 1>stack and people like the transparency they can see exactly

0:23:31.560 --> 0:23:34.720
<v Speaker 1>what the technology is doing. They actually it's turned into

0:23:34.760 --> 0:23:37.600
<v Speaker 1>a great recruiting vehicle for our software engineers.

0:23:38.840 --> 0:23:39.320
<v Speaker 3>Interesting.

0:23:39.520 --> 0:23:42.200
<v Speaker 4>So let's just go first to the price point, just

0:23:42.440 --> 0:23:44.840
<v Speaker 4>a cheap offering. A lot of that's done by having

0:23:44.920 --> 0:23:48.840
<v Speaker 4>less pricing components. For example, in videos, chips are incredibly expensive.

0:23:48.880 --> 0:23:51.760
<v Speaker 4>We know people pay it because of what they offer

0:23:51.920 --> 0:23:54.960
<v Speaker 4>the full stack in many ways, but they struggle from

0:23:55.000 --> 0:23:59.080
<v Speaker 4>a choke perspective on how bandwidth memory chips in particular, you.

0:23:59.040 --> 0:24:00.800
<v Speaker 3>Don't need them, Why do you need them? Why don't

0:24:00.800 --> 0:24:01.600
<v Speaker 3>you want them?

0:24:02.040 --> 0:24:05.000
<v Speaker 1>Well, it's partly about choices. So there's two choices. One is,

0:24:05.359 --> 0:24:08.800
<v Speaker 1>if you pick a really expensive memory technology, you'll never

0:24:08.880 --> 0:24:12.080
<v Speaker 1>get the price down right, and so you need to

0:24:12.400 --> 0:24:16.080
<v Speaker 1>then make technology decisions to lower your costs. So we

0:24:16.320 --> 0:24:20.160
<v Speaker 1>have a tensor process or architecture, we keep the data

0:24:20.200 --> 0:24:23.800
<v Speaker 1>on chip. More, we have a software stack that's very

0:24:23.800 --> 0:24:28.120
<v Speaker 1>good at partitioning AI workloads across multiple chips, and then

0:24:28.160 --> 0:24:32.000
<v Speaker 1>they can send information and compute packets to each other

0:24:32.280 --> 0:24:35.399
<v Speaker 1>without having to go through memory, and that lowers the

0:24:35.400 --> 0:24:38.320
<v Speaker 1>memory vandwith required and also lets it scale more naturally

0:24:38.320 --> 0:24:39.320
<v Speaker 1>across many chips.

0:24:39.920 --> 0:24:43.000
<v Speaker 3>So I'm a new investor. You brought me on board.

0:24:43.200 --> 0:24:44.960
<v Speaker 3>I'm interested Bezos Samsung.

0:24:45.480 --> 0:24:47.280
<v Speaker 4>But you're saying, look, I'm going to do this with

0:24:47.760 --> 0:24:50.720
<v Speaker 4>more open architecture with cheaper offerings. How much of the

0:24:50.720 --> 0:24:52.280
<v Speaker 4>market shed do you have to get? What sort of

0:24:52.280 --> 0:24:54.320
<v Speaker 4>price point are we looking at for your chip offering?

0:24:55.920 --> 0:24:58.679
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so this is really wild. The market is so

0:24:58.880 --> 0:25:02.000
<v Speaker 1>big to percent we have to get is actually pretty

0:25:02.040 --> 0:25:04.960
<v Speaker 1>small to be a real value proposition. You know, next

0:25:05.040 --> 0:25:06.639
<v Speaker 1>year we'll die and go to heaven if we make

0:25:06.680 --> 0:25:09.440
<v Speaker 1>two hundred million dollars. We have already booked one hundred

0:25:09.440 --> 0:25:12.760
<v Speaker 1>and fifty million in revenue. I'm really interested in finding

0:25:12.920 --> 0:25:16.400
<v Speaker 1>small players, early players. People want to own their technology.

0:25:17.119 --> 0:25:21.040
<v Speaker 1>People are excited about our software and hardware architecture, and

0:25:21.520 --> 0:25:24.119
<v Speaker 1>you know, I want to grow organically from there. I

0:25:24.160 --> 0:25:27.040
<v Speaker 1>think some people will focus on the big guys first,

0:25:27.560 --> 0:25:30.840
<v Speaker 1>That's not how new technology introductions go. You focus on

0:25:31.240 --> 0:25:34.840
<v Speaker 1>smaller players, people who need a differentiation. And that's what

0:25:34.880 --> 0:25:36.040
<v Speaker 1>we're really that's our mission.

0:25:36.400 --> 0:25:39.960
<v Speaker 4>So what therefore is the mission building in in terms

0:25:39.960 --> 0:25:43.560
<v Speaker 4>of long term value of generative AI of AI applications?

0:25:44.200 --> 0:25:45.680
<v Speaker 4>Do you think that we are in some sort of

0:25:45.720 --> 0:25:48.600
<v Speaker 4>hype cycle? Do you think that actually this market is

0:25:48.640 --> 0:25:50.200
<v Speaker 4>as big as manufacturing in.

0:25:51.160 --> 0:25:53.480
<v Speaker 1>Well, first of all, we are definitely in the hype cycle.

0:25:53.640 --> 0:25:56.440
<v Speaker 1>There's going to be multiple and people say, well, Jim,

0:25:56.520 --> 0:25:58.159
<v Speaker 1>you'll understand it's going to go down next year, and

0:25:58.160 --> 0:25:59.680
<v Speaker 1>then it's going to go up, and it's going down

0:26:00.040 --> 0:26:03.040
<v Speaker 1>low past filter all that stuff. Right, What's really going

0:26:03.080 --> 0:26:06.800
<v Speaker 1>to happen is AI is going to dominate computing over

0:26:06.840 --> 0:26:10.919
<v Speaker 1>the next ten years and we're just starting and the

0:26:11.000 --> 0:26:12.760
<v Speaker 1>hardware is going to change a lot, the software is

0:26:12.800 --> 0:26:15.400
<v Speaker 1>going to change a lot. Like one day you read

0:26:15.440 --> 0:26:17.800
<v Speaker 1>in the papers, LMS can do anything, and the next

0:26:17.880 --> 0:26:21.280
<v Speaker 1>day you read they've hit a limit. Ignore all that stuff.

0:26:21.680 --> 0:26:24.800
<v Speaker 1>We're just starting this. There's going to be massive transformations.

0:26:25.280 --> 0:26:27.840
<v Speaker 1>So what I really wanted tense Torrent to have is

0:26:28.359 --> 0:26:33.119
<v Speaker 1>great computer designers, general purpose CPUs, AI processors, chip design,

0:26:33.359 --> 0:26:37.399
<v Speaker 1>system design, software design. And then the open source stuff

0:26:37.480 --> 0:26:40.000
<v Speaker 1>is really interesting because that engages a community. People are

0:26:40.000 --> 0:26:42.480
<v Speaker 1>really passionate about that to contribute back.

0:26:43.760 --> 0:26:47.120
<v Speaker 4>This is why you're thinking about your own talent team.

0:26:47.160 --> 0:26:49.720
<v Speaker 4>You've managed talent, as we said, sort of across the board.

0:26:50.200 --> 0:26:53.080
<v Speaker 4>You began like you're integraled to the chip design process

0:26:53.080 --> 0:26:54.919
<v Speaker 4>in the US. When you think back to DC and

0:26:54.960 --> 0:26:57.720
<v Speaker 4>then the work that you then did at AMD moving

0:26:57.760 --> 0:27:00.000
<v Speaker 4>to Apple, you were Intel, and I just have to

0:27:00.200 --> 0:27:02.159
<v Speaker 4>go there. On this day that Pat Gelsinger hands in

0:27:02.240 --> 0:27:06.080
<v Speaker 4>his well, hands his hat on off, he's going to

0:27:06.119 --> 0:27:08.720
<v Speaker 4>re resigning. Many would say it's because they didn't get

0:27:08.760 --> 0:27:10.040
<v Speaker 4>into AI quickly enough.

0:27:10.080 --> 0:27:12.040
<v Speaker 3>That was prior to him. What do you make of

0:27:12.040 --> 0:27:12.600
<v Speaker 3>the transition?

0:27:14.000 --> 0:27:16.400
<v Speaker 1>Well, it's hard to say. So I like Pat personally.

0:27:16.440 --> 0:27:18.920
<v Speaker 1>I've met him a number of times. He's a smart guy.

0:27:19.000 --> 0:27:23.880
<v Speaker 1>He really cares. I think the market focuses too much

0:27:23.920 --> 0:27:28.080
<v Speaker 1>on stuff like execution and AI transition the way you

0:27:28.400 --> 0:27:31.760
<v Speaker 1>make money. Get customers to build great products. Like Steve

0:27:31.840 --> 0:27:34.840
<v Speaker 1>Jobs is the best at this focus on the product,

0:27:34.920 --> 0:27:37.920
<v Speaker 1>make the best product you possibly can. And I think

0:27:38.160 --> 0:27:41.320
<v Speaker 1>they need somebody way more hands on, really focus on product,

0:27:41.760 --> 0:27:44.760
<v Speaker 1>and they need to stop talking about AI execution all

0:27:44.800 --> 0:27:47.600
<v Speaker 1>the nonsense. Right when they make the best product, the

0:27:47.600 --> 0:27:50.880
<v Speaker 1>best fab, the best chip, the best GP accelerator, they'll

0:27:50.880 --> 0:27:51.280
<v Speaker 1>do fine.

0:27:52.480 --> 0:27:55.399
<v Speaker 4>Jim, when you're thinking about all of the errors, you

0:27:55.440 --> 0:27:58.359
<v Speaker 4>want to own. How much does US and China factor

0:27:58.359 --> 0:27:59.920
<v Speaker 4>into your growth story?

0:28:01.520 --> 0:28:06.600
<v Speaker 1>So, first of all, we are building open source software

0:28:06.960 --> 0:28:12.040
<v Speaker 1>risk five based technology. We think that's an open platform.

0:28:12.119 --> 0:28:14.480
<v Speaker 1>There's a lot of people interested in that. At the

0:28:14.520 --> 0:28:18.000
<v Speaker 1>same time, you know, there are you know, restrictions by

0:28:18.000 --> 0:28:20.520
<v Speaker 1>the US government and trade rules. We have really good

0:28:20.600 --> 0:28:23.600
<v Speaker 1>lawyers and trade compliance people. We work very closely with

0:28:23.640 --> 0:28:27.120
<v Speaker 1>those those guys. We want to do the right thing

0:28:27.240 --> 0:28:29.760
<v Speaker 1>both for the business and for you know, being compliant

0:28:29.800 --> 0:28:33.080
<v Speaker 1>to what's going on. And it's a changing world and

0:28:33.440 --> 0:28:38.000
<v Speaker 1>we're very involved in that. Short run. Our business possibilities

0:28:38.000 --> 0:28:41.280
<v Speaker 1>are really big, and you know, if China plays in that,

0:28:41.280 --> 0:28:44.040
<v Speaker 1>that'll be interesting. If it doesn't, for you know, various reasons.

0:28:44.040 --> 0:28:47.880
<v Speaker 4>That's fine, got a big valuation. Come back when you're

0:28:47.920 --> 0:28:50.600
<v Speaker 4>executing on the latest round. Thank you, Jim Keller of

0:28:50.760 --> 0:28:53.240
<v Speaker 4>ten Stone, All right, great to have you. Meanwhile, Europe's

0:28:53.280 --> 0:28:56.960
<v Speaker 4>most valuable start up, Housing has moved from software to hardware.

0:28:57.200 --> 0:29:00.680
<v Speaker 4>Company that provided AI software for drones and jet fighters

0:29:00.880 --> 0:29:03.600
<v Speaker 4>and now making weapons of its own, debuting a new

0:29:03.640 --> 0:29:06.720
<v Speaker 4>attack drone. Blum Begs mart Bergen joins US for more

0:29:07.200 --> 0:29:08.080
<v Speaker 4>five billion.

0:29:07.760 --> 0:29:09.520
<v Speaker 3>Euro values start up.

0:29:09.960 --> 0:29:12.480
<v Speaker 4>And this is all about drones potentially to be used

0:29:12.480 --> 0:29:15.520
<v Speaker 4>in terrain for example Russia issue.

0:29:17.360 --> 0:29:19.400
<v Speaker 10>Correct, I mean, so there's a couple of things. They

0:29:19.440 --> 0:29:22.160
<v Speaker 10>have their AI software. Their main feature here is that

0:29:22.240 --> 0:29:25.360
<v Speaker 10>they say they have built software that allows these drones

0:29:25.400 --> 0:29:28.240
<v Speaker 10>to avoid GPS jamming. So a major problem in the

0:29:28.280 --> 0:29:31.360
<v Speaker 10>war in Ukraine has been Russia's electronic warfare that has

0:29:31.640 --> 0:29:35.560
<v Speaker 10>blocked GPS and effectively rendered these drones kind of useless, right,

0:29:35.560 --> 0:29:38.400
<v Speaker 10>And they say that we've built these autonomous drones they

0:29:38.400 --> 0:29:41.640
<v Speaker 10>can get over this GPS issue. Now they're going to

0:29:41.640 --> 0:29:43.680
<v Speaker 10>be shipping these new units. They're said, they're talking to

0:29:43.760 --> 0:29:46.160
<v Speaker 10>Ukraine and their NATO allys. And the way the company

0:29:46.200 --> 0:29:48.040
<v Speaker 10>describes it is they sort of see this as this

0:29:48.440 --> 0:29:51.480
<v Speaker 10>border deterrent, not just in Ukraine but across all the

0:29:51.520 --> 0:29:55.120
<v Speaker 10>eastern flank of countries in Europe that border Russia.

0:29:55.760 --> 0:29:58.240
<v Speaker 4>Let's just talk a little bit about the startup itself,

0:29:58.240 --> 0:30:01.120
<v Speaker 4>pretty cagy around details of the technol energy in sales.

0:30:01.680 --> 0:30:04.040
<v Speaker 4>They didn't want to give a demonstration, but who is

0:30:04.120 --> 0:30:06.480
<v Speaker 4>backing them and who is buying from them?

0:30:07.800 --> 0:30:10.120
<v Speaker 10>So they've had some pretty prominent backers that the most

0:30:10.480 --> 0:30:13.920
<v Speaker 10>early one was Daniel Eck who invested the Spotify founder

0:30:13.960 --> 0:30:16.800
<v Speaker 10>invested through his fund. They received some pretty big investments

0:30:16.800 --> 0:30:20.800
<v Speaker 10>from general catalysts, the US fund that's become much more

0:30:20.840 --> 0:30:23.760
<v Speaker 10>active in Europe, so getting a mixture, i say, of

0:30:23.840 --> 0:30:27.440
<v Speaker 10>European and American investors. They have had a deal with

0:30:27.520 --> 0:30:31.760
<v Speaker 10>SOB to work on the euro Jet fighter, and they've

0:30:31.760 --> 0:30:35.120
<v Speaker 10>also done some deals with Airbus and some drug manufacturers.

0:30:35.360 --> 0:30:37.840
<v Speaker 10>What we haven't really seen is actually, is to our

0:30:37.880 --> 0:30:40.520
<v Speaker 10>point in the story, a clear demonstration of the products.

0:30:40.560 --> 0:30:42.160
<v Speaker 10>You know, a lot of this has been sort of

0:30:42.200 --> 0:30:45.120
<v Speaker 10>bespoke AI deals and kind of working on command and

0:30:45.160 --> 0:30:48.520
<v Speaker 10>control software and making these weapons sort of more intelligent

0:30:48.800 --> 0:30:50.440
<v Speaker 10>and more autonomous. This is the first time we're going

0:30:50.480 --> 0:30:54.080
<v Speaker 10>to actually see something that they produced potentially go into

0:30:54.120 --> 0:30:59.320
<v Speaker 10>the battlefield. They have not shared anything about revenue or profits,

0:31:00.040 --> 0:31:02.640
<v Speaker 10>but as we know, they've raised nearly a billion dollars

0:31:02.680 --> 0:31:03.000
<v Speaker 10>to date.

0:31:03.880 --> 0:31:06.480
<v Speaker 4>We'll see how the HX two performs when we get

0:31:06.480 --> 0:31:07.640
<v Speaker 4>that sort of detail in information.

0:31:08.320 --> 0:31:10.120
<v Speaker 3>Mark Bergen, it's a brilliant story. Thank you.

0:31:10.280 --> 0:31:12.560
<v Speaker 4>Coming up, look at how the fade of TikTok in

0:31:12.560 --> 0:31:15.479
<v Speaker 4>the US can impact future investments in Chinese tech. Michail

0:31:15.480 --> 0:31:18.080
<v Speaker 4>Green of lead Edge Capital that he's joining us. Next,

0:31:18.760 --> 0:31:33.280
<v Speaker 4>this is Blue Meg Technology. Let's get a check in

0:31:33.320 --> 0:31:35.560
<v Speaker 4>on these crypto markets for you and the moment, because

0:31:36.000 --> 0:31:39.400
<v Speaker 4>maybe we've been tempering some of the phenomenal rally that

0:31:39.440 --> 0:31:42.040
<v Speaker 4>we've seen in bitcoin. We're not nearly one hundred thousand dollars,

0:31:42.040 --> 0:31:44.200
<v Speaker 4>Mark quite ninety six thousand where it trade were off

0:31:44.200 --> 0:31:46.120
<v Speaker 4>by one point percent. The whole of crypto seems to

0:31:46.200 --> 0:31:49.120
<v Speaker 4>be partying Miami this week, but I'm looking at Mara Holding,

0:31:49.160 --> 0:31:51.640
<v Speaker 4>so we're down by five point five percent. New kid

0:31:51.640 --> 0:31:54.360
<v Speaker 4>on the block announcing how much it's buying in terms

0:31:54.360 --> 0:31:56.600
<v Speaker 4>of bitcoin onto its balance sheet. This, of course is

0:31:56.600 --> 0:32:00.120
<v Speaker 4>a bitcoin mining company, and micro Strategy has been doing this.

0:32:00.080 --> 0:32:01.040
<v Speaker 3>For several years now.

0:32:01.080 --> 0:32:03.640
<v Speaker 4>We know Michael Saylor has been plowing yet more money

0:32:03.640 --> 0:32:06.680
<v Speaker 4>into bitcoin in the last week, announcing that this morning

0:32:06.720 --> 0:32:09.080
<v Speaker 4>as well. Let's do it all with Isabelle Lee. I mean,

0:32:09.440 --> 0:32:12.280
<v Speaker 4>Michael Saylor showed us how it's done. What they own

0:32:12.320 --> 0:32:14.800
<v Speaker 4>more than thirty maybe even forty billion dollars worth of

0:32:14.840 --> 0:32:15.880
<v Speaker 4>bitcoin on a balance sheet.

0:32:15.920 --> 0:32:17.640
<v Speaker 3>Now Mara is joining.

0:32:17.480 --> 0:32:20.000
<v Speaker 11>It's thirty eight billion, and they're now announcing their fourth

0:32:20.040 --> 0:32:22.080
<v Speaker 11>straight week of buying. It's just really astonishing. We have

0:32:22.120 --> 0:32:25.360
<v Speaker 11>the likes of Kassie Wood really kind of rejoicing. Sounds bad,

0:32:25.440 --> 0:32:27.760
<v Speaker 11>but they're rejoicing the Trump administration because they know that

0:32:27.800 --> 0:32:30.040
<v Speaker 11>this will mean good news for the coin. And as

0:32:30.040 --> 0:32:32.120
<v Speaker 11>you can see, it really bols soed ever since Trump won.

0:32:32.360 --> 0:32:34.120
<v Speaker 11>You can see the chart, it really was just a

0:32:34.120 --> 0:32:35.880
<v Speaker 11>spike higer. And yes we're struggling to hit the one

0:32:35.960 --> 0:32:38.760
<v Speaker 11>hundred thousand mark, but we're inching ever closer there. It's

0:32:38.760 --> 0:32:41.640
<v Speaker 11>around ninety six ninety seven, So that's really a positive news.

0:32:41.640 --> 0:32:43.800
<v Speaker 11>And we have Trump saying on his first day he

0:32:43.840 --> 0:32:46.560
<v Speaker 11>will fire SEC chair Gary Gensler. No need for that

0:32:46.640 --> 0:32:48.480
<v Speaker 11>since Gensler said he will step down. But we have

0:32:48.520 --> 0:32:52.880
<v Speaker 11>Paul Atkins, who served as Republican SEC Commissioner being considered,

0:32:53.240 --> 0:32:54.800
<v Speaker 11>according to reports by Bloomberg.

0:32:54.880 --> 0:32:57.479
<v Speaker 3>So it's really lots of tailwinds.

0:32:56.920 --> 0:32:59.560
<v Speaker 11>For the space. And now we have the establishment takeover

0:32:59.600 --> 0:33:00.720
<v Speaker 11>of fifth as well.

0:33:01.200 --> 0:33:05.600
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I mean so interesting how at one point Tesla

0:33:05.680 --> 0:33:08.520
<v Speaker 4>was doing the same thing. Companies did have bitcoin on

0:33:08.560 --> 0:33:10.920
<v Speaker 4>the balance sheet, but really it was only Microstructurgy that

0:33:11.160 --> 0:33:13.480
<v Speaker 4>stayed committed. Now we have Mara doing the same thing.

0:33:13.880 --> 0:33:17.240
<v Speaker 4>What's interesting is we did hear from Kathie Wood saying

0:33:17.440 --> 0:33:22.280
<v Speaker 4>praising a new regime under the administration. She's pretty long

0:33:22.400 --> 0:33:25.520
<v Speaker 4>digital asset classes. But where else does she see positivity?

0:33:26.120 --> 0:33:28.640
<v Speaker 11>He sees a lot of positivity, not only in crypto,

0:33:28.680 --> 0:33:31.400
<v Speaker 11>but also in fintech companies and m and a all

0:33:31.440 --> 0:33:33.479
<v Speaker 11>of that. Really all of the things that were clamped

0:33:33.480 --> 0:33:37.280
<v Speaker 11>down under this administration. Remember a lot of the CFTC

0:33:37.440 --> 0:33:40.480
<v Speaker 11>also banned a lot of acquisitions in the tech space.

0:33:40.520 --> 0:33:44.840
<v Speaker 11>So she just sees more loose regulations, softer regulations on

0:33:44.880 --> 0:33:46.840
<v Speaker 11>the space. And when it comes to bitcoin, it's not

0:33:46.920 --> 0:33:50.920
<v Speaker 11>just Marathon Mara Holdings or even micro Strategy acquiring bitcoin

0:33:50.960 --> 0:33:53.360
<v Speaker 11>for the US government potentially being a whale. There's a

0:33:53.360 --> 0:33:56.600
<v Speaker 11>bill that if it's passed, will require a fed to

0:33:56.640 --> 0:33:58.960
<v Speaker 11>sell some of their goal and buy bitcoin. So that's

0:33:58.960 --> 0:34:00.640
<v Speaker 11>good news for the space, but of course it will

0:34:00.640 --> 0:34:03.200
<v Speaker 11>create risks like price volatility in the run up to

0:34:03.280 --> 0:34:05.959
<v Speaker 11>that gold price might think bitcoin might rise, and of

0:34:06.000 --> 0:34:08.920
<v Speaker 11>course whoever holds what will kind of suffer or celebrate.

0:34:09.040 --> 0:34:11.360
<v Speaker 11>But there's really a lot of things happening in this space.

0:34:11.400 --> 0:34:14.040
<v Speaker 11>But it's interesting because now a lot of companies on

0:34:14.200 --> 0:34:15.840
<v Speaker 11>more bitcoin than others.

0:34:16.360 --> 0:34:18.839
<v Speaker 4>It's a bali or thanks crypto, We appreciate it. Look,

0:34:18.840 --> 0:34:21.920
<v Speaker 4>crypto regulation is looming over law makers in Washington, but

0:34:21.960 --> 0:34:24.719
<v Speaker 4>it's not the only tech policy facing uncertainty. Of course,

0:34:24.760 --> 0:34:26.719
<v Speaker 4>the future of TikTok in the United States is also

0:34:26.840 --> 0:34:28.680
<v Speaker 4>up in the air, as well as impacts of President

0:34:28.719 --> 0:34:31.719
<v Speaker 4>elect Trump's threats to impost weeping tarifs, most significantly on

0:34:31.840 --> 0:34:34.560
<v Speaker 4>Chinese goods. Mitchell Green's with us founder and managing partner

0:34:34.600 --> 0:34:37.799
<v Speaker 4>and need Edge Capital, key investor in byte Dance. You've

0:34:37.840 --> 0:34:40.720
<v Speaker 4>been building up that investment in the secondary market, Mitchell,

0:34:40.760 --> 0:34:42.440
<v Speaker 4>and I just want to understand how much of a

0:34:42.480 --> 0:34:44.520
<v Speaker 4>weight you think US China is on it.

0:34:46.920 --> 0:34:49.600
<v Speaker 12>Thanks Carolin for having me, and how much weight do

0:34:49.680 --> 0:34:50.279
<v Speaker 12>I think it is?

0:34:51.040 --> 0:34:51.840
<v Speaker 13>So for us?

0:34:52.600 --> 0:34:57.160
<v Speaker 12>We actually in our base case, assume that we have

0:34:57.239 --> 0:35:00.720
<v Speaker 12>assumed that the US business would have actually not account

0:35:00.800 --> 0:35:04.160
<v Speaker 12>for anything, and we thought it would be banned. What

0:35:04.600 --> 0:35:08.600
<v Speaker 12>you see Trump saying is looks like it may head

0:35:08.640 --> 0:35:12.000
<v Speaker 12>another way. You know, what people say and do in

0:35:12.120 --> 0:35:16.040
<v Speaker 12>Washington on both sides are two very different things. Who knows,

0:35:16.960 --> 0:35:20.680
<v Speaker 12>you know, I think I can't imagine the first thing

0:35:21.200 --> 0:35:24.759
<v Speaker 12>Donald Trump wants to do though, is being TikTok, especially

0:35:24.800 --> 0:35:28.000
<v Speaker 12>when a lot of his big supporters like inn Elon Mosk,

0:35:28.040 --> 0:35:29.759
<v Speaker 12>who I think is you know, probably an ads with

0:35:29.800 --> 0:35:32.040
<v Speaker 12>Mark Zuckerberg, who would be the one to benefit off

0:35:32.080 --> 0:35:35.759
<v Speaker 12>of a you know, being a TikTok band, or like

0:35:35.760 --> 0:35:39.799
<v Speaker 12>a Joe Rogan who's a huge supporter on TikTok, Right,

0:35:39.960 --> 0:35:42.160
<v Speaker 12>I love, I think it's pretty positive for TikTok to

0:35:42.200 --> 0:35:43.439
<v Speaker 12>have Trump in office.

0:35:44.440 --> 0:35:47.800
<v Speaker 4>Meanwhile, Mark Zuckerberg, we understand, has been dining with Trump

0:35:47.880 --> 0:35:50.399
<v Speaker 4>over in mar A Lago last week, so maybe real

0:35:50.520 --> 0:35:54.200
<v Speaker 4>music changes there. But I'm I'm interested more broadly on

0:35:54.600 --> 0:35:57.359
<v Speaker 4>just spell out TikTok and how integral it is too

0:35:57.560 --> 0:35:59.920
<v Speaker 4>broad a bite dance investment choices of yours.

0:36:01.600 --> 0:36:05.840
<v Speaker 12>Yes, so the Chinese business, you know, the you know,

0:36:05.880 --> 0:36:08.560
<v Speaker 12>it's been it's been rumored and reported in the press

0:36:09.120 --> 0:36:12.680
<v Speaker 12>that you know, the North American version of TikTok is

0:36:13.040 --> 0:36:16.040
<v Speaker 12>a single digit percentage of the business. It is not

0:36:16.080 --> 0:36:17.960
<v Speaker 12>a very It is not a giant part of the business.

0:36:17.960 --> 0:36:20.160
<v Speaker 12>I think it is a part of the business where

0:36:20.840 --> 0:36:25.160
<v Speaker 12>a lot of investors or potential investors in it see

0:36:25.200 --> 0:36:29.000
<v Speaker 12>a huge amount of opportunity. You know, I believe that

0:36:29.120 --> 0:36:32.719
<v Speaker 12>TikTok is the biggest existential threat to a business like

0:36:32.800 --> 0:36:36.440
<v Speaker 12>Facebook or you know, Instagram inside Facebook or Snapchat. I mean,

0:36:36.520 --> 0:36:39.960
<v Speaker 12>just go ask millennials in America what they use or

0:36:40.040 --> 0:36:41.960
<v Speaker 12>if you know your own kids, or just look at

0:36:42.000 --> 0:36:45.160
<v Speaker 12>their usage patterns and look at the data around like

0:36:45.239 --> 0:36:47.719
<v Speaker 12>daily active users and how much time has spent on

0:36:47.719 --> 0:36:50.520
<v Speaker 12>all these different apps. And TikTok is a real player.

0:36:50.560 --> 0:36:52.880
<v Speaker 12>But I can assure you Mark Zuckerberg would love to

0:36:52.880 --> 0:36:54.800
<v Speaker 12>have a band. It would be great for his business.

0:36:55.520 --> 0:36:58.879
<v Speaker 4>But Mitchell, your expertise is so great on the show

0:36:58.920 --> 0:37:01.799
<v Speaker 4>because you led or co led some significant investments like

0:37:01.840 --> 0:37:04.359
<v Speaker 4>buy Dance, but also like Ali Barba, you're someone who

0:37:04.520 --> 0:37:09.040
<v Speaker 4>understands the consumer of China where technology is going there.

0:37:09.160 --> 0:37:11.080
<v Speaker 3>How much harder has your life become.

0:37:11.320 --> 0:37:14.640
<v Speaker 4>To access these sorts of deals on secondary market, for example,

0:37:14.719 --> 0:37:16.759
<v Speaker 4>to be long China investments.

0:37:18.239 --> 0:37:20.759
<v Speaker 12>It's not very popular at the moment. We'll put it

0:37:20.800 --> 0:37:24.279
<v Speaker 12>that way, although some of the greatest investors I know say,

0:37:24.280 --> 0:37:26.320
<v Speaker 12>if you do you know, if ninety nine percent of

0:37:26.400 --> 0:37:28.040
<v Speaker 12>investors are doing, If you want to know where public

0:37:28.080 --> 0:37:31.200
<v Speaker 12>markets are doing, ask the ten smartest hedge fund investors.

0:37:31.239 --> 0:37:33.080
<v Speaker 12>And when all of them tell you one, when nine

0:37:33.080 --> 0:37:35.000
<v Speaker 12>of them tell you one thing and one tells you

0:37:35.120 --> 0:37:36.920
<v Speaker 12>the other, you know, do what the one does and

0:37:36.960 --> 0:37:38.799
<v Speaker 12>you'll probably make a lot of money. It is sure

0:37:38.960 --> 0:37:41.640
<v Speaker 12>now of consensus trade at the moment. Buy in China.

0:37:42.040 --> 0:37:42.960
<v Speaker 3>But it is cheap.

0:37:43.040 --> 0:37:45.239
<v Speaker 12>I mean, we can buy byte Dance, and we've been

0:37:45.239 --> 0:37:49.200
<v Speaker 12>buying byte Dance, you know, sub five times earnings for

0:37:49.280 --> 0:37:53.080
<v Speaker 12>a business you know, growing you know, much faster than Facebook.

0:37:53.800 --> 0:37:55.919
<v Speaker 12>So we think it's really cheap and that the risk

0:37:55.960 --> 0:37:58.879
<v Speaker 12>adjusted reward is quite attractive. And in our base case

0:37:58.920 --> 0:38:01.600
<v Speaker 12>model we model the business is zero. Look, we might

0:38:01.600 --> 0:38:06.760
<v Speaker 12>get we might get lucky. The Trump may not ban it, yeah,

0:38:06.880 --> 0:38:09.080
<v Speaker 12>you may. You know, the Chinese economy made start to

0:38:09.120 --> 0:38:13.040
<v Speaker 12>recover some and on any start of the imagination looking

0:38:13.040 --> 0:38:16.279
<v Speaker 12>at public Chinese comps today in the internet space. If

0:38:16.280 --> 0:38:18.880
<v Speaker 12>you look at Tencent or Ali Baba or Sea Trip,

0:38:19.239 --> 0:38:22.120
<v Speaker 12>these things trade that you know, substantially hire multiples in

0:38:22.120 --> 0:38:24.520
<v Speaker 12>five times earning. So not only are we potentially going

0:38:24.600 --> 0:38:27.360
<v Speaker 12>to get earnings growth, we're also going to get multiple

0:38:27.400 --> 0:38:30.399
<v Speaker 12>expansion and MOONI exit. But I can't tell you when

0:38:30.400 --> 0:38:32.440
<v Speaker 12>the company is going public, and I don't think nor

0:38:32.480 --> 0:38:37.080
<v Speaker 12>can anybody else, but tailwinds. Whereas the US political environment

0:38:37.600 --> 0:38:39.279
<v Speaker 12>six months ago. Look, look it was going to be

0:38:39.280 --> 0:38:43.160
<v Speaker 12>a huge headwind. It might become a tailwind, but you know,

0:38:43.239 --> 0:38:43.839
<v Speaker 12>time will tell.

0:38:44.600 --> 0:38:47.720
<v Speaker 4>Mitchell Green found a managing partner of lead Edge Capital.

0:38:48.080 --> 0:38:59.120
<v Speaker 4>You like people on with contrarian ideas. This gets today's

0:38:59.120 --> 0:39:02.280
<v Speaker 4>screen Time letter bloom Meggs Lucashaw writing over the weekend

0:39:02.280 --> 0:39:06.000
<v Speaker 4>about how he's uncovered financial details about Lebron James's media

0:39:06.040 --> 0:39:08.680
<v Speaker 4>company that reveal quite a bit about the current state

0:39:08.719 --> 0:39:12.080
<v Speaker 4>of Hollywood. Because joins us, Now, you were pulled off

0:39:12.080 --> 0:39:14.839
<v Speaker 4>the bench from sitting and consuming content and hanging out

0:39:14.880 --> 0:39:17.640
<v Speaker 4>with family to write the newsletter, because what twenty eight

0:39:17.640 --> 0:39:21.120
<v Speaker 4>million being lost? This is a company that's valued well

0:39:21.360 --> 0:39:22.640
<v Speaker 4>in the heyday, very high.

0:39:22.840 --> 0:39:26.440
<v Speaker 13>Yeah, well, they benefited from the streaming boom that happened, right,

0:39:26.480 --> 0:39:29.799
<v Speaker 13>You add all these companies that were making shows for

0:39:29.920 --> 0:39:33.480
<v Speaker 13>Netflix and Amazon and Disney and others, and those in

0:39:33.480 --> 0:39:36.960
<v Speaker 13>particular affiliated with famous people. Reese Witherspoon's company, Lebron James's

0:39:36.960 --> 0:39:40.120
<v Speaker 13>company raised money at valuations that really, in retrospect, made

0:39:40.160 --> 0:39:43.000
<v Speaker 13>no sense. I mean, Lebron's company got a valuation of

0:39:43.000 --> 0:39:45.640
<v Speaker 13>more than seven hundred million dollars when its revenue was

0:39:45.880 --> 0:39:49.759
<v Speaker 13>high seventy millions, and it lost millions of dollars. And

0:39:50.960 --> 0:39:52.759
<v Speaker 13>you know, they ended up having to pay for it

0:39:52.760 --> 0:39:54.799
<v Speaker 13>in the end because the market crashed a little bit,

0:39:54.880 --> 0:39:56.600
<v Speaker 13>and people are looking at these companies differently.

0:39:57.239 --> 0:40:00.840
<v Speaker 4>They're managing to well get lemon out of Lemons with

0:40:00.880 --> 0:40:02.319
<v Speaker 4>a merger with full Well seventy three.

0:40:02.480 --> 0:40:04.080
<v Speaker 3>Is that going to be Lemonade? What does that deal

0:40:04.120 --> 0:40:04.480
<v Speaker 3>look like?

0:40:04.800 --> 0:40:08.239
<v Speaker 13>Well, look, the deal does give them more scale, and

0:40:08.280 --> 0:40:10.000
<v Speaker 13>I think that will benefit them at a time where

0:40:10.000 --> 0:40:12.600
<v Speaker 13>these companies that they're competing with are giant cutting back.

0:40:12.920 --> 0:40:16.600
<v Speaker 13>It also gives them some complimentary expertises. You know, the

0:40:16.760 --> 0:40:19.680
<v Speaker 13>Lebron's company is very good at unscripted. Full Well is

0:40:19.719 --> 0:40:22.280
<v Speaker 13>also good at unscripted, but does more live events. Lebrons

0:40:22.320 --> 0:40:24.400
<v Speaker 13>has a big branding company. I do think it's probably

0:40:24.440 --> 0:40:28.280
<v Speaker 13>squishing together to challenge businesses to try to solve a problem.

0:40:28.480 --> 0:40:30.120
<v Speaker 13>Sometimes that works, sometimes it doesn't.

0:40:30.880 --> 0:40:33.160
<v Speaker 4>I mean, you talk a lot about Maverick Carter, who's

0:40:33.200 --> 0:40:34.920
<v Speaker 4>kind of the guy who's running the business on the

0:40:35.000 --> 0:40:38.040
<v Speaker 4>daily basis, and he smart things around, not building it

0:40:38.560 --> 0:40:42.160
<v Speaker 4>within Lebron James, but sort of all around Lebron.

0:40:42.200 --> 0:40:44.480
<v Speaker 3>It's sort of like he's been the expert in the building.

0:40:44.480 --> 0:40:47.080
<v Speaker 4>Meanwhile, everyone's trying to work out where content does work.

0:40:47.360 --> 0:40:49.600
<v Speaker 3>Clearly it's working in the theaters right now.

0:40:49.680 --> 0:40:53.880
<v Speaker 4>I mean Wicked and Gladiator or Moana too, seems to

0:40:53.920 --> 0:40:55.000
<v Speaker 4>be one everyone's excited about.

0:40:55.120 --> 0:40:57.239
<v Speaker 13>Yeah, huge weekend at the box office, I mean Moan

0:40:57.320 --> 0:41:01.600
<v Speaker 13>or two, setting records the big animated or biggest Thanksgiving

0:41:01.640 --> 0:41:04.920
<v Speaker 13>opening ever, one of the biggest animated openings ever, I believe,

0:41:04.960 --> 0:41:07.000
<v Speaker 13>the biggest opening of the year, most close to four

0:41:07.120 --> 0:41:11.040
<v Speaker 13>hundred million dollars worldwide. Is just insane. And then the

0:41:11.080 --> 0:41:12.680
<v Speaker 13>you know, the good news for movie theaters. The good

0:41:12.680 --> 0:41:14.880
<v Speaker 13>news for Hollywood is that you had two other movies

0:41:14.920 --> 0:41:18.160
<v Speaker 13>out in Wicked and the sequel to Gladiator that people

0:41:18.160 --> 0:41:19.759
<v Speaker 13>were very excited about. I mean, the stat that blew

0:41:19.840 --> 0:41:23.759
<v Speaker 13>my mind was that seventy five percent of showtimes this

0:41:23.800 --> 0:41:25.720
<v Speaker 13>past weekend were for those three movies.

0:41:26.760 --> 0:41:30.120
<v Speaker 3>Wow, and as kind of everyone's catered for in this scenario.

0:41:29.960 --> 0:41:34.040
<v Speaker 4>Kids are catered for male women no matter what you're.

0:41:33.880 --> 0:41:37.719
<v Speaker 13>Across demographics and reaction, You've got singing, You've yeah, you've

0:41:37.719 --> 0:41:39.600
<v Speaker 13>got a little bit of everything for everyone.

0:41:39.800 --> 0:41:42.800
<v Speaker 4>But the money being made, I mean Gladiator and Wicked,

0:41:42.800 --> 0:41:44.279
<v Speaker 4>I can't imagine prediction cheap to make.

0:41:44.320 --> 0:41:45.360
<v Speaker 3>They have to make some money.

0:41:45.520 --> 0:41:49.399
<v Speaker 13>Yeah, Gladiator very expensive. I think they have owned two

0:41:49.480 --> 0:41:51.960
<v Speaker 13>hundred and fifty million dollars to produce. Some people say

0:41:51.960 --> 0:41:54.240
<v Speaker 13>it's more that's the one that will be the hardest

0:41:54.239 --> 0:41:56.399
<v Speaker 13>to make money on because it's probably going to top out,

0:41:56.480 --> 0:41:59.520
<v Speaker 13>you know, five hundred maybe six hundred million worldwide. Wicked,

0:41:59.560 --> 0:42:02.040
<v Speaker 13>I think maybe one p fifty one seventy five. It

0:42:02.040 --> 0:42:03.960
<v Speaker 13>will make enough to make money, and then Mwan is

0:42:04.000 --> 0:42:05.040
<v Speaker 13>going to make a fortune for.

0:42:04.960 --> 0:42:08.040
<v Speaker 3>Disney As and all the merch. I'm already going to

0:42:08.120 --> 0:42:10.759
<v Speaker 3>hit with that. Bloomberg's Lucas Shaw, we love it. Thank you.

0:42:10.800 --> 0:42:12.799
<v Speaker 3>That does it for this edition of Bloomberg Technology. Do

0:42:12.880 --> 0:42:14.240
<v Speaker 3>not forget to check out our podcast.

0:42:14.480 --> 0:42:17.320
<v Speaker 4>Find it on the terminal, as well as online on Apple, Spotify,

0:42:17.520 --> 0:42:19.160
<v Speaker 4>and iHeart this is a Bloomberg