WEBVTT - Commonwealth's McMillan on Need for Consumer Spending (Audio)

0:00:02.440 --> 0:00:05.840
<v Speaker 1>Global business news twenty four hours a day at Bloomberg

0:00:05.880 --> 0:00:08.920
<v Speaker 1>dot com, the radio, plus mobile lact and on your radio.

0:00:09.240 --> 0:00:13.640
<v Speaker 1>This is a Bloomberg Business Flash for all Bloomberg World headquarters.

0:00:13.680 --> 0:00:16.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm Charlie Pellett. We have got thirteen minutes to go

0:00:16.280 --> 0:00:19.200
<v Speaker 1>ahead of the close on a Monday, the DAL, the SMP,

0:00:19.360 --> 0:00:22.960
<v Speaker 1>NEZDAC hall rallying by one percent or more. The tenure

0:00:22.960 --> 0:00:26.520
<v Speaker 1>down fourteen thirty seconds. That yield one point seven four percent,

0:00:26.960 --> 0:00:29.800
<v Speaker 1>Gold up three dollars, the ounce to twelve seventy five

0:00:29.920 --> 0:00:32.200
<v Speaker 1>seventy a gain there of two tents of one percent.

0:00:32.680 --> 0:00:36.000
<v Speaker 1>And crude oil forty seven ninety seven a barrel right

0:00:36.000 --> 0:00:39.040
<v Speaker 1>now up three point eight percent on West Texas Intermediate.

0:00:39.400 --> 0:00:42.240
<v Speaker 1>That is a game of the dollars seventy five so again,

0:00:42.280 --> 0:00:45.720
<v Speaker 1>recapping our rally underway for stocks, SMP up twenty a

0:00:45.760 --> 0:00:49.320
<v Speaker 1>gain of one percent down, industrials up eight five also

0:00:49.479 --> 0:00:52.960
<v Speaker 1>up one point one percent. I'm Charlie Pellett, and that's

0:00:53.080 --> 0:00:56.480
<v Speaker 1>a Bloomberg Business Flash. Charlie Pellett, thank you so very much.

0:00:56.560 --> 0:00:58.280
<v Speaker 1>Now it's a sign for the et F Report, brought

0:00:58.320 --> 0:01:01.200
<v Speaker 1>to you by Vanneck Vector's et FS. Expect more from

0:01:01.200 --> 0:01:05.120
<v Speaker 1>your muni's target tax exempt income by maturity and credit quality,

0:01:05.319 --> 0:01:07.520
<v Speaker 1>all with low cost e t f s because van

0:01:07.800 --> 0:01:12.279
<v Speaker 1>dot com slash Muni van eck access the opportunities now

0:01:12.280 --> 0:01:14.000
<v Speaker 1>with the latest on e t F s our own

0:01:14.120 --> 0:01:18.120
<v Speaker 1>Katherine Cowtery, last week was a tough one for retailers

0:01:18.200 --> 0:01:22.080
<v Speaker 1>is disastrous. Reports from Macy's to Nordstrom sent shares tumbling.

0:01:22.440 --> 0:01:25.520
<v Speaker 1>E t S had focused on retail companies had varying results.

0:01:25.760 --> 0:01:29.479
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Intelligence analyst Eric Beltuna says it illustrates the importance

0:01:29.480 --> 0:01:32.640
<v Speaker 1>of waiting. His example the spider s and p retail

0:01:32.680 --> 0:01:35.200
<v Speaker 1>e t F taker x RT. Keep in mind this

0:01:35.280 --> 0:01:37.520
<v Speaker 1>is equal weighted, so you're getting a lot of zip

0:01:37.520 --> 0:01:39.840
<v Speaker 1>in here. Small caps cats that destroyed it. X RT

0:01:40.000 --> 0:01:42.679
<v Speaker 1>fell four point six percent last week, and e t

0:01:42.800 --> 0:01:45.640
<v Speaker 1>F with a large allocation to retail shares, declined less

0:01:45.640 --> 0:01:48.040
<v Speaker 1>than other funds in the group. It's the Power Shares

0:01:48.120 --> 0:01:52.400
<v Speaker 1>d W a consumer cyclicals Momentum portfolio ticker p e Z.

0:01:52.920 --> 0:01:57.360
<v Speaker 1>The momentum ETFs basically will look at price movement as

0:01:57.360 --> 0:02:00.480
<v Speaker 1>a screening apparatus, so if the price starts to go

0:02:00.520 --> 0:02:03.520
<v Speaker 1>down relative to other stocks, it kicks it out and

0:02:03.560 --> 0:02:05.960
<v Speaker 1>a lot of times you'll see that technical it's like

0:02:06.040 --> 0:02:08.640
<v Speaker 1>technical analysis. You'll see the price movement go down a

0:02:08.680 --> 0:02:10.720
<v Speaker 1>little before the big one, and so a lot of

0:02:10.720 --> 0:02:13.600
<v Speaker 1>times you can save yourself even though momentum sounds more volatile.

0:02:13.960 --> 0:02:16.440
<v Speaker 1>I've seen it avoid some of the bigger downfalls with

0:02:16.480 --> 0:02:19.760
<v Speaker 1>the big stocks. The easy declined one point one percent.

0:02:20.240 --> 0:02:26.040
<v Speaker 1>That's your Bloomberg ETF report. I'm Catherine Cowdery. You're listening

0:02:26.080 --> 0:02:29.680
<v Speaker 1>to Taking Stock with Bim Fox and Kathleen Hayes on

0:02:29.760 --> 0:02:35.480
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Radio. Scheduled for release tomorrow consumer Prices. What will

0:02:35.520 --> 0:02:39.360
<v Speaker 1>that economic report as well as Manufacturing and Industry also

0:02:39.400 --> 0:02:43.000
<v Speaker 1>scheduled for tomorrow. What will that mean for your portfolio? Well,

0:02:43.040 --> 0:02:46.919
<v Speaker 1>Brad McMillan is the Chief Investment Officer Commonwealth Financial Network,

0:02:47.639 --> 0:02:51.720
<v Speaker 1>helping to manage over a hundred billion dollars in assets,

0:02:51.960 --> 0:02:55.320
<v Speaker 1>and he can be followed on Twitter at Brad McMillan

0:02:55.480 --> 0:02:58.680
<v Speaker 1>c f A. He joins us now, Brad, thanks ver

0:02:58.760 --> 0:03:00.799
<v Speaker 1>much for being with us. Let's start off at the

0:03:00.840 --> 0:03:03.800
<v Speaker 1>Consumer Price Report, the CPI that will be out tomorrow.

0:03:04.280 --> 0:03:08.200
<v Speaker 1>Tell us what you expect and what this means for investors.

0:03:09.240 --> 0:03:13.000
<v Speaker 1>We expect to see an increase in UH in inflation

0:03:13.760 --> 0:03:17.600
<v Speaker 1>at the headline level, particularly, but also at the core level,

0:03:17.919 --> 0:03:20.240
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna see maybe a little bit of fireworks because

0:03:20.240 --> 0:03:22.680
<v Speaker 1>you could see the headline number check up, but it's

0:03:22.720 --> 0:03:24.760
<v Speaker 1>not going to mean anything. The important number is the

0:03:24.800 --> 0:03:27.000
<v Speaker 1>core number and actually just be more of the same,

0:03:27.480 --> 0:03:29.480
<v Speaker 1>more of the same, enough for the FED to reserve

0:03:29.520 --> 0:03:31.960
<v Speaker 1>to get excited about inflation. You know, we live in

0:03:32.000 --> 0:03:33.880
<v Speaker 1>an era that's not like it was thirty years ago,

0:03:33.919 --> 0:03:36.119
<v Speaker 1>twenty years ago, ten years ago. FED wants to see

0:03:36.200 --> 0:03:39.000
<v Speaker 1>more inflation so it can help boost wages for a

0:03:39.040 --> 0:03:42.920
<v Speaker 1>little more lift under the economy sales. The f's in

0:03:43.040 --> 0:03:44.800
<v Speaker 1>kind of a rock and a hard place, and you're

0:03:44.800 --> 0:03:48.720
<v Speaker 1>absolutely right and wants to see inflation. The problem is

0:03:48.760 --> 0:03:52.560
<v Speaker 1>even the core, we're just kicking above the level where

0:03:52.640 --> 0:03:55.600
<v Speaker 1>they want to see. So there's enough to justify and

0:03:55.680 --> 0:03:57.640
<v Speaker 1>increase at some point, but not enough to light a

0:03:57.720 --> 0:03:59.880
<v Speaker 1>fire under them yet. I don't think this is going

0:03:59.920 --> 0:04:03.000
<v Speaker 1>to be enough to move them. In June. Brad McMillan, Uh,

0:04:03.240 --> 0:04:05.720
<v Speaker 1>how about the industrial production data? What will that show?

0:04:06.680 --> 0:04:08.720
<v Speaker 1>We're probably going to see a bit of a recovery.

0:04:08.840 --> 0:04:12.080
<v Speaker 1>We're going to see We're going to see utilities continue

0:04:12.120 --> 0:04:15.280
<v Speaker 1>to do well, we're going to see manufacturing hopefully picked up.

0:04:15.680 --> 0:04:18.560
<v Speaker 1>But again it's going to be a recovery. It's not

0:04:18.600 --> 0:04:21.320
<v Speaker 1>going to be a jump ahead. So it will probably

0:04:21.400 --> 0:04:24.960
<v Speaker 1>continue stabilization. But nothing to get excited about, nothing to

0:04:25.040 --> 0:04:27.839
<v Speaker 1>drive fed to move. Okay, so we can talk about

0:04:27.839 --> 0:04:32.440
<v Speaker 1>manufacturing industrial production, and you know the inflation numbers. Housing

0:04:32.440 --> 0:04:36.200
<v Speaker 1>starts are also out tomorrow. The Blueberg survey suggests that

0:04:36.200 --> 0:04:38.800
<v Speaker 1>we will have some move up in new home construction.

0:04:39.240 --> 0:04:42.880
<v Speaker 1>So connect the dots force from some of these industry

0:04:42.960 --> 0:04:46.600
<v Speaker 1>to some of the UH stocks you like, the sectors

0:04:46.680 --> 0:04:49.039
<v Speaker 1>you like, and let's start with home builders since they're

0:04:49.080 --> 0:04:54.400
<v Speaker 1>they're directly involved in home construction. Certainly, you saw the

0:04:54.720 --> 0:04:57.599
<v Speaker 1>you saw the Homeme Builders survey come in today. It

0:04:57.640 --> 0:05:00.080
<v Speaker 1>was stable at a very positive level, but it and

0:05:00.160 --> 0:05:03.880
<v Speaker 1>improved like people expected. And most of that decline actually

0:05:03.880 --> 0:05:07.640
<v Speaker 1>came from the Northeast where sentiment went down. Now, the

0:05:07.680 --> 0:05:10.279
<v Speaker 1>problem is we've got a lot of supply issues here.

0:05:10.279 --> 0:05:12.120
<v Speaker 1>We've got a lack of land, we've got a lack

0:05:12.160 --> 0:05:15.640
<v Speaker 1>of labor to build these things. That's what's holding it

0:05:15.720 --> 0:05:19.000
<v Speaker 1>back and that's going to limit the improvement. But at

0:05:19.000 --> 0:05:21.920
<v Speaker 1>the same time. That's going to make the recovery run

0:05:22.040 --> 0:05:24.600
<v Speaker 1>longer because we're not going to be able to over build,

0:05:25.080 --> 0:05:27.760
<v Speaker 1>and we're getting enough demand to help continue to drive

0:05:27.880 --> 0:05:30.600
<v Speaker 1>consumer spending, which is kicked. All right, you talk about

0:05:30.680 --> 0:05:34.400
<v Speaker 1>driving consumer spending, is that going to help corporate profits?

0:05:34.400 --> 0:05:37.039
<v Speaker 1>Didn't we just get through a really well bad quarter.

0:05:38.200 --> 0:05:40.039
<v Speaker 1>It was a bad quarter, but you have to look

0:05:40.080 --> 0:05:43.479
<v Speaker 1>at everything that happened during the quarter. People were thinking

0:05:43.520 --> 0:05:46.360
<v Speaker 1>the world was going to end well, guess what, it didn't,

0:05:46.680 --> 0:05:50.600
<v Speaker 1>and consumer sentiment, consumer spending was depressed by that. But

0:05:50.760 --> 0:05:54.360
<v Speaker 1>spring is here till on the retail sales report last Friday,

0:05:54.640 --> 0:05:57.400
<v Speaker 1>consumers are starting to spend. It's not that they couldn't spend,

0:05:57.800 --> 0:05:59.920
<v Speaker 1>it's that they chose not to and now they're opening

0:06:00.040 --> 0:06:03.760
<v Speaker 1>the wallets, which is excellent. Hey, is it possible, Brad,

0:06:04.000 --> 0:06:06.599
<v Speaker 1>that over the course of the year we could find

0:06:06.680 --> 0:06:08.880
<v Speaker 1>a bit of a sweep spot for stocks. If you're right,

0:06:09.160 --> 0:06:12.920
<v Speaker 1>you see reasonably positive on the US economy. Consumers will

0:06:13.240 --> 0:06:16.719
<v Speaker 1>spend enough, they'll spend more. But is it also possible

0:06:16.800 --> 0:06:19.839
<v Speaker 1>that they don't spend so much that the fetter reserves

0:06:19.880 --> 0:06:23.360
<v Speaker 1>feels in any hurry to raise interest rates with Is

0:06:23.400 --> 0:06:26.279
<v Speaker 1>that possible. And if that's what occurs, is that good

0:06:26.279 --> 0:06:28.520
<v Speaker 1>for stocks because things have picked up, but the FET

0:06:28.560 --> 0:06:33.039
<v Speaker 1>isn't tightening More on policy, I think the Goldilocks scenario

0:06:33.160 --> 0:06:37.240
<v Speaker 1>is not only possible but becoming increasingly likely. We need

0:06:37.240 --> 0:06:40.040
<v Speaker 1>consumers to start spending that that just there are signs

0:06:40.040 --> 0:06:43.600
<v Speaker 1>that that's exactly what they're doing. We need business to stabilize,

0:06:43.600 --> 0:06:45.880
<v Speaker 1>and we're seeing signs of that in the energy sector

0:06:46.279 --> 0:06:49.080
<v Speaker 1>and in capital investment. But we don't want them going

0:06:49.200 --> 0:06:51.919
<v Speaker 1>nuts right now. The fet is happy with where we

0:06:51.960 --> 0:06:54.880
<v Speaker 1>are where we are, but they're not dying to raise Rachel,

0:06:54.960 --> 0:06:57.280
<v Speaker 1>I could see that continuing for the next quarter or two.

0:06:57.720 --> 0:07:00.880
<v Speaker 1>You mentioned energy, and I'm just wondering where do you

0:07:00.920 --> 0:07:03.200
<v Speaker 1>think that the energy market is headed When we have

0:07:03.920 --> 0:07:08.080
<v Speaker 1>filings for bankruptcy for companies such as Sandridge Energy and

0:07:08.240 --> 0:07:11.760
<v Speaker 1>there's no let up. Well, that's the thing. We've seen

0:07:11.880 --> 0:07:16.240
<v Speaker 1>energy prices come up by about se off the floor.

0:07:16.680 --> 0:07:19.160
<v Speaker 1>What does that mean? That means companies that were just

0:07:19.240 --> 0:07:21.440
<v Speaker 1>trying to make it are now going to get a

0:07:21.480 --> 0:07:23.720
<v Speaker 1>second rease on life. The ones that have been the worst,

0:07:23.720 --> 0:07:25.640
<v Speaker 1>the ones that haven't been able to make it through,

0:07:25.960 --> 0:07:28.760
<v Speaker 1>as you say, are going bankrupt, but that queers the

0:07:29.080 --> 0:07:32.160
<v Speaker 1>clears the deck for the ones that can continue. And actually,

0:07:32.280 --> 0:07:36.680
<v Speaker 1>what's capital? Companies with capital pick up these assets for

0:07:36.760 --> 0:07:39.160
<v Speaker 1>pennies on the dollar, and that's also going to help

0:07:39.160 --> 0:07:42.160
<v Speaker 1>profits going forward. What do you like in technology? What

0:07:42.200 --> 0:07:44.360
<v Speaker 1>are you dislike in technology? It can be you know,

0:07:44.720 --> 0:07:46.800
<v Speaker 1>are you are you interested in social media? Are you

0:07:46.960 --> 0:07:49.760
<v Speaker 1>interested in some of the old line more blue chip

0:07:49.880 --> 0:07:54.600
<v Speaker 1>dividend pairs like Microsoft. It's funny to hear Microsoft described

0:07:54.640 --> 0:07:57.040
<v Speaker 1>as a blue line as a blue chip dividend pair,

0:07:57.120 --> 0:07:59.720
<v Speaker 1>although of course it is, and that is exactly what

0:07:59.760 --> 0:08:02.720
<v Speaker 1>I do white because the real power of technology in

0:08:02.880 --> 0:08:05.920
<v Speaker 1>what's still a fairly difficult business environment is to help

0:08:05.960 --> 0:08:10.160
<v Speaker 1>companies cut costs. I think there's the opportunity social media

0:08:10.240 --> 0:08:14.800
<v Speaker 1>absolutely on a tear, but for sustainable business building, being

0:08:14.840 --> 0:08:17.640
<v Speaker 1>able to help other companies cut costs is exactly where

0:08:17.720 --> 0:08:22.000
<v Speaker 1>companies like Microsoft, for Oracle are making their mark, and

0:08:22.080 --> 0:08:24.600
<v Speaker 1>that's going to continue to be an opportunity going forward.

0:08:25.000 --> 0:08:28.200
<v Speaker 1>But doesn't the idea of cutting your costs fly in

0:08:28.280 --> 0:08:31.480
<v Speaker 1>the face of increasing your revenues. If you're trying to

0:08:31.520 --> 0:08:34.240
<v Speaker 1>cut things to the bone, you're going to improve the

0:08:34.320 --> 0:08:36.920
<v Speaker 1>bottom line. But I thought that the top line, the

0:08:37.000 --> 0:08:39.880
<v Speaker 1>increase in revenue and sales what what is what is

0:08:39.920 --> 0:08:45.040
<v Speaker 1>bedeviling most companies. You're right, the revenue growth is a problem,

0:08:45.080 --> 0:08:48.720
<v Speaker 1>and I would tie that into slow growth overall. But nonetheless,

0:08:48.760 --> 0:08:51.600
<v Speaker 1>why can't you do both? That's the challenge and that's

0:08:51.600 --> 0:08:54.400
<v Speaker 1>actually where I think the opportunity is for companies in

0:08:54.400 --> 0:08:57.559
<v Speaker 1>the market. We've had a difficult business environment. They've had

0:08:57.600 --> 0:08:59.800
<v Speaker 1>to cut costs and they're doing so, but at this

0:09:00.280 --> 0:09:03.040
<v Speaker 1>time they're looking to be more efficient and to grow

0:09:03.080 --> 0:09:06.080
<v Speaker 1>their top wine popline growth has not been easy. But

0:09:06.320 --> 0:09:09.680
<v Speaker 1>as the economy continues to expand and do so more quickly,

0:09:09.840 --> 0:09:12.000
<v Speaker 1>we're going to see companies be able to do both

0:09:12.080 --> 0:09:14.480
<v Speaker 1>and that's going to help on the earning side. So

0:09:14.520 --> 0:09:16.319
<v Speaker 1>what about bonds. We have a bit of a bit

0:09:16.320 --> 0:09:17.800
<v Speaker 1>of a sell off, enough of us all off to

0:09:17.800 --> 0:09:20.000
<v Speaker 1>push the tenure note yield up to one point seven five.

0:09:20.000 --> 0:09:22.920
<v Speaker 1>It have been one point seven four, one point seven three. Interesting,

0:09:23.000 --> 0:09:26.440
<v Speaker 1>fabulous story actually on the terminal today, the mixed view

0:09:26.559 --> 0:09:29.079
<v Speaker 1>on Wall Street of where bond deals are heading. Standard

0:09:29.160 --> 0:09:32.120
<v Speaker 1>Charter is looking for a rally in the tenure treasury

0:09:32.160 --> 0:09:34.920
<v Speaker 1>down to one point six in terms of yield, What

0:09:35.000 --> 0:09:37.160
<v Speaker 1>do you see and is there any play that you

0:09:37.160 --> 0:09:40.960
<v Speaker 1>would recommend in fixed income right now? Right now? I

0:09:41.000 --> 0:09:43.679
<v Speaker 1>think if you're looking at rates, is largely driven by

0:09:43.720 --> 0:09:47.319
<v Speaker 1>international news. You're looking at you're looking at Brexit, You're

0:09:47.320 --> 0:09:50.839
<v Speaker 1>looking at Europe, you're looking at China. That's what's driving

0:09:50.920 --> 0:09:55.120
<v Speaker 1>pricing when US treasuries rather than domestic factors. I don't

0:09:55.120 --> 0:09:57.440
<v Speaker 1>think you see the FED moving at all. You know,

0:09:57.480 --> 0:10:00.360
<v Speaker 1>it's probably not in June, maybe not until STI number,

0:10:00.679 --> 0:10:02.880
<v Speaker 1>So I think that's what's going on. In terms of

0:10:02.920 --> 0:10:05.840
<v Speaker 1>where to go. I think credit still remains attractive. We

0:10:05.840 --> 0:10:09.200
<v Speaker 1>saw a real rally in high yield and so, but

0:10:09.240 --> 0:10:12.000
<v Speaker 1>there still maybe some juice in the apple there. But

0:10:12.240 --> 0:10:15.000
<v Speaker 1>I would still be in credit rather than in sovereign

0:10:15.120 --> 0:10:19.160
<v Speaker 1>simply because there is incremental return in RBO at commonwealth.

0:10:19.679 --> 0:10:22.720
<v Speaker 1>So you don't see a major slowdown. What about a

0:10:22.720 --> 0:10:28.000
<v Speaker 1>major correction in the stock market, That's certainly possible, But

0:10:28.200 --> 0:10:30.320
<v Speaker 1>if you look at what we saw earlier in the year,

0:10:30.400 --> 0:10:34.120
<v Speaker 1>we saw a pullback, A lot of the selling has

0:10:34.160 --> 0:10:36.840
<v Speaker 1>been done. Where is the bad news that would force

0:10:36.880 --> 0:10:39.440
<v Speaker 1>the correction in the near term. I just don't say

0:10:39.440 --> 0:10:43.320
<v Speaker 1>it all right, Brad McMillan, Thank you so very much

0:10:43.320 --> 0:10:47.240
<v Speaker 1>for joining us today. Thank you, Chief Investment Officer for

0:10:47.400 --> 0:10:52.959
<v Speaker 1>Commonwealth Financial Network. He sees, uh, not too much move

0:10:53.040 --> 0:10:55.200
<v Speaker 1>up in inflation, but a consumer that's going to keep

0:10:55.520 --> 0:10:58.400
<v Speaker 1>spending and driving the economy and forward, but not so much.

0:10:58.440 --> 0:11:00.840
<v Speaker 1>The FED will move right away, maybe on September, and

0:11:00.960 --> 0:11:04.800
<v Speaker 1>that's a potential sweet spot for US stock investors. I'm

0:11:04.880 --> 0:11:08.320
<v Speaker 1>Kathleen Hayes. Along with pim Fox coming up Dave Wilson

0:11:08.320 --> 0:11:12.120
<v Speaker 1>are stocks editor, movers and shakers on Bloomberg Radio.