WEBVTT - JPMorgan’s Melissa Smith on Middle Market Banking

0:00:02.600 --> 0:00:11.960
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio News. This is Masters in

0:00:12.000 --> 0:00:15.520
<v Speaker 1>Business with Barry Ritholts on Bloomberg Radio.

0:00:16.320 --> 0:00:19.800
<v Speaker 2>This week on the podcast, I have yet another extra

0:00:19.880 --> 0:00:23.759
<v Speaker 2>special guest. Melissa Smith is co head of Commercial Banking

0:00:24.160 --> 0:00:25.160
<v Speaker 2>for JP Morgan.

0:00:25.480 --> 0:00:30.240
<v Speaker 3>Previously, she was co head of the bank's Innovation Economy Group.

0:00:30.880 --> 0:00:34.279
<v Speaker 2>Really fascinating because she sees the world from a very

0:00:34.320 --> 0:00:40.120
<v Speaker 2>unique perch. Has incredible access to every aspect of both

0:00:40.200 --> 0:00:45.879
<v Speaker 2>commercial and investing banking that a small startup or medium

0:00:45.920 --> 0:00:49.159
<v Speaker 2>sized company and by medium I mean up to two

0:00:49.240 --> 0:00:54.440
<v Speaker 2>billion dollars in revenue might need, and that gives her

0:00:54.480 --> 0:00:59.400
<v Speaker 2>this really incredible set of insights into how these companies

0:00:59.400 --> 0:01:03.240
<v Speaker 2>are growing, what they need, what direction various industries are

0:01:03.240 --> 0:01:05.920
<v Speaker 2>moving in. It's really kind of fascinating because if you

0:01:06.120 --> 0:01:10.679
<v Speaker 2>remember back twenty five years ago, Wall Street and the

0:01:10.800 --> 0:01:13.960
<v Speaker 2>large investment banks and brokers were kind of accused of

0:01:14.600 --> 0:01:18.680
<v Speaker 2>moving up market and abandoning that whole middle section and

0:01:18.920 --> 0:01:22.800
<v Speaker 2>allowing private equity to get a toe hold there. To

0:01:22.880 --> 0:01:26.880
<v Speaker 2>their credit, JP Morgan has aggressively moved back into what

0:01:26.959 --> 0:01:30.480
<v Speaker 2>some people used to call, you know, middle merchant banking

0:01:30.680 --> 0:01:34.880
<v Speaker 2>or middle market banking. And I thought this conversation is

0:01:35.400 --> 0:01:38.640
<v Speaker 2>just a whole world that you don't know exists and

0:01:38.760 --> 0:01:42.679
<v Speaker 2>is in fact robust and growing rapidly. I thought this

0:01:42.840 --> 0:01:46.040
<v Speaker 2>was a fascinating conversation and I think you will also

0:01:46.200 --> 0:01:51.480
<v Speaker 2>with no further ado, my conversation with JP Morgan's Melissa Smith.

0:01:51.760 --> 0:01:53.520
<v Speaker 4>Thank you so much for having me. It's a pleasure

0:01:53.560 --> 0:01:53.920
<v Speaker 4>to be here.

0:01:53.960 --> 0:01:56.200
<v Speaker 2>Well, thank you for being here. Let's talk a little

0:01:56.240 --> 0:01:59.760
<v Speaker 2>bit about your background before we work up to JP Morgan.

0:02:00.640 --> 0:02:03.760
<v Speaker 2>Bachelor's in political science from American University and then you

0:02:03.800 --> 0:02:07.520
<v Speaker 2>get a master's in public policy from University of Chicago,

0:02:08.280 --> 0:02:11.560
<v Speaker 2>not the traditional path for people in finance.

0:02:11.919 --> 0:02:13.120
<v Speaker 3>What was the original plan?

0:02:13.680 --> 0:02:15.560
<v Speaker 5>So I definitely thought that I was going to work

0:02:15.560 --> 0:02:20.120
<v Speaker 5>in the public sector. When I'm recruiting at JP Morgan,

0:02:20.320 --> 0:02:22.400
<v Speaker 5>I always get the question sort of how did you

0:02:22.400 --> 0:02:24.280
<v Speaker 5>get into investment banking? And I would love to tell

0:02:24.280 --> 0:02:25.880
<v Speaker 5>people I had a grand plan. I didn't really have

0:02:25.880 --> 0:02:30.160
<v Speaker 5>a grand plan. But my policy degree was at University

0:02:30.200 --> 0:02:32.560
<v Speaker 5>of Chicago, so it was very heavy econ and stats

0:02:32.600 --> 0:02:35.200
<v Speaker 5>and basically the same core curriculum as the business school.

0:02:35.840 --> 0:02:39.320
<v Speaker 5>And in my summer in between, I worked for Mayor

0:02:39.440 --> 0:02:42.760
<v Speaker 5>Daily in Chicago and economic development issues and as I

0:02:42.840 --> 0:02:45.200
<v Speaker 5>was doing that, I sort of decided it would be

0:02:45.240 --> 0:02:47.720
<v Speaker 5>even more interesting to come to the public sector at

0:02:47.760 --> 0:02:51.240
<v Speaker 5>a more senior level. And I also wanted to make

0:02:51.280 --> 0:02:53.560
<v Speaker 5>sure that I was going somewhere that would really leverage

0:02:53.560 --> 0:02:56.680
<v Speaker 5>the quantitative skills that I was acquiring at Chicago. And

0:02:56.760 --> 0:02:58.280
<v Speaker 5>I also thought it'd be a really good idea to

0:02:58.280 --> 0:03:00.000
<v Speaker 5>be able to pay off my undergrad and grad school life.

0:03:00.720 --> 0:03:04.079
<v Speaker 2>So that makes a lot of sense. But before you

0:03:04.160 --> 0:03:07.640
<v Speaker 2>got your master's in public policy, you have a little

0:03:07.680 --> 0:03:12.440
<v Speaker 2>bit of a different professional experience. You began ballet at

0:03:12.480 --> 0:03:16.440
<v Speaker 2>age four and dance professionally for how many years?

0:03:16.560 --> 0:03:17.320
<v Speaker 4>For three years?

0:03:17.680 --> 0:03:20.280
<v Speaker 2>Tell us about that that is not the usual path

0:03:20.320 --> 0:03:21.519
<v Speaker 2>to Wall Street.

0:03:21.720 --> 0:03:24.040
<v Speaker 5>Definitely not so. Yes, I started taking ballet at a

0:03:24.160 --> 0:03:24.919
<v Speaker 5>very early age.

0:03:25.000 --> 0:03:25.480
<v Speaker 4>That was my.

0:03:25.520 --> 0:03:31.520
<v Speaker 5>Original career aspirations. Starting in seventh grade. My poor mother

0:03:31.639 --> 0:03:33.680
<v Speaker 5>drove me one hundred and twenty miles round trip every

0:03:33.760 --> 0:03:35.120
<v Speaker 5>day to Washington, d C.

0:03:35.280 --> 0:03:37.000
<v Speaker 4>To go to ballet where I was from.

0:03:37.400 --> 0:03:39.880
<v Speaker 5>Left school early at noon, kind of got home at

0:03:39.920 --> 0:03:43.640
<v Speaker 5>nine or ten at night every night, and so, you know,

0:03:43.760 --> 0:03:46.240
<v Speaker 5>quite frankly, my parents were sick of driving me. So

0:03:46.520 --> 0:03:49.040
<v Speaker 5>I graduated from high school year early in order to

0:03:49.120 --> 0:03:52.160
<v Speaker 5>dance and sort of continue my dance training and then

0:03:52.440 --> 0:03:55.920
<v Speaker 5>dance professionally before I went to college. And my again,

0:03:55.960 --> 0:04:00.640
<v Speaker 5>my aspiration was to just continue dancing professionally. As you

0:04:00.680 --> 0:04:03.000
<v Speaker 5>may or may not be aware, you know, very few

0:04:03.040 --> 0:04:04.920
<v Speaker 5>people obviously sort of make it in that world point

0:04:05.000 --> 0:04:06.840
<v Speaker 5>zero zero zero zer zir one percent are ever going

0:04:06.880 --> 0:04:08.760
<v Speaker 5>to be an ABT, which is sort of the pinnacle

0:04:08.760 --> 0:04:12.760
<v Speaker 5>in the US American Ballet theater. And so while I was,

0:04:12.840 --> 0:04:14.240
<v Speaker 5>you know, good enough to be in a small company,

0:04:14.280 --> 0:04:15.360
<v Speaker 5>I was not going to be an ABT and I

0:04:15.400 --> 0:04:17.159
<v Speaker 5>didn't want to totally give up my education, and so

0:04:17.200 --> 0:04:18.039
<v Speaker 5>that's why I stopped.

0:04:18.279 --> 0:04:21.839
<v Speaker 2>I know people who were pretty far along that same process,

0:04:22.400 --> 0:04:25.680
<v Speaker 2>and as they've gotten older, they talk about like they

0:04:25.720 --> 0:04:29.679
<v Speaker 2>sound like old football players talking about injuries, their ankles,

0:04:29.720 --> 0:04:32.839
<v Speaker 2>their toes, their caves, their knees. I'm like, wait, no, no,

0:04:32.880 --> 0:04:35.039
<v Speaker 2>you guys are just dancing and they laugh when you

0:04:35.080 --> 0:04:35.480
<v Speaker 2>say that.

0:04:36.000 --> 0:04:37.719
<v Speaker 3>What was your experience like with that?

0:04:38.440 --> 0:04:41.279
<v Speaker 5>I mean, it was an amazing experience in that it

0:04:41.400 --> 0:04:45.080
<v Speaker 5>teaches you such a huge amount of discipline and you know,

0:04:45.320 --> 0:04:49.440
<v Speaker 5>takes determination, perseverance and kind of grit. You know, just

0:04:49.480 --> 0:04:51.520
<v Speaker 5>back to there's very few people who sort of make it.

0:04:51.560 --> 0:04:53.600
<v Speaker 5>You are in a sort of a siloed world because

0:04:53.760 --> 0:04:55.159
<v Speaker 5>all you do every day is dance. Is kind of

0:04:55.360 --> 0:04:58.279
<v Speaker 5>how I describe it. And I would also say, you know,

0:04:58.400 --> 0:05:00.280
<v Speaker 5>I can have this debate with people all day long.

0:05:01.360 --> 0:05:04.120
<v Speaker 5>I think there is no greater form of athlete than

0:05:04.160 --> 0:05:07.800
<v Speaker 5>a dancer. To your point, they are It is grueling

0:05:07.839 --> 0:05:12.320
<v Speaker 5>on one's body and really really physical, really really physical.

0:05:12.440 --> 0:05:15.800
<v Speaker 5>I'm in any way that any other athletics are. With

0:05:15.880 --> 0:05:18.520
<v Speaker 5>the added sort of thing on top, which is the

0:05:18.560 --> 0:05:21.360
<v Speaker 5>whole point of ballet is to make it look effortless.

0:05:21.600 --> 0:05:23.720
<v Speaker 5>There's no like grunting down the basketball court or the

0:05:23.720 --> 0:05:26.679
<v Speaker 5>football court, right, So it takes the same amount of strength,

0:05:26.720 --> 0:05:29.240
<v Speaker 5>but you add the control of your body on top

0:05:29.279 --> 0:05:31.000
<v Speaker 5>of that to make it look effortless. And that's why,

0:05:31.160 --> 0:05:33.600
<v Speaker 5>you know, sort of the athleticism is very unique. But

0:05:33.640 --> 0:05:36.400
<v Speaker 5>it was an incredible experience and I felt very lucky

0:05:36.400 --> 0:05:38.240
<v Speaker 5>at a young age to have something that I was

0:05:38.279 --> 0:05:41.240
<v Speaker 5>so passionate about. Not everybody sort of has that in

0:05:41.279 --> 0:05:42.599
<v Speaker 5>their lives at an early age.

0:05:42.920 --> 0:05:48.960
<v Speaker 2>And your comment about perseverance and grit, those are personality characteristics.

0:05:49.120 --> 0:05:51.799
<v Speaker 2>I don't know you know whether to call them skills

0:05:51.880 --> 0:05:54.640
<v Speaker 2>or not, but that will help you no matter what

0:05:54.680 --> 0:06:00.000
<v Speaker 2>you do. Absolutely absolutely, So ballet to college to grad school.

0:06:00.560 --> 0:06:02.520
<v Speaker 2>How did you stumble into JP Morgan?

0:06:03.240 --> 0:06:06.039
<v Speaker 5>So again, did not have a grand plan at the

0:06:06.160 --> 0:06:09.040
<v Speaker 5>time that I was in Policy School at Chicago. JP

0:06:09.160 --> 0:06:12.960
<v Speaker 5>Morgan's public finance team recruited specifically at the policy school.

0:06:13.080 --> 0:06:14.880
<v Speaker 5>Just back to it was this, you know, very kind

0:06:14.880 --> 0:06:19.320
<v Speaker 5>of quantitatively based and so kind of randomly went to

0:06:19.360 --> 0:06:22.320
<v Speaker 5>the interview to be quite honest, and was you know,

0:06:22.440 --> 0:06:24.800
<v Speaker 5>did well, was offered a role sort of back back

0:06:24.839 --> 0:06:26.440
<v Speaker 5>to my earlier point, kind of thought it was good

0:06:26.440 --> 0:06:28.680
<v Speaker 5>to get some private sector credibility at my resume, learn

0:06:28.760 --> 0:06:32.760
<v Speaker 5>something new, and I think probably as anybody coming out

0:06:32.800 --> 0:06:34.840
<v Speaker 5>of either undergrad or grad school thinks, you know, oh,

0:06:34.880 --> 0:06:36.520
<v Speaker 5>I'll go do this for five years and sort of.

0:06:36.480 --> 0:06:37.720
<v Speaker 4>See where that leads me.

0:06:38.200 --> 0:06:39.880
<v Speaker 5>And lo and behold, you know, have been at JP

0:06:39.960 --> 0:06:41.920
<v Speaker 5>Moore in to your point, you know, twenty plus years.

0:06:41.680 --> 0:06:42.880
<v Speaker 3>Now, that's amazing.

0:06:42.920 --> 0:06:46.239
<v Speaker 2>So you start as an associate, You're focused on debt? Yes,

0:06:46.640 --> 0:06:48.640
<v Speaker 2>was there an interest in debt? Was that just related

0:06:48.680 --> 0:06:49.640
<v Speaker 2>to public policy?

0:06:49.960 --> 0:06:52.479
<v Speaker 5>So I started in public finance, which is back to

0:06:52.480 --> 0:06:54.320
<v Speaker 5>that's why they were recruiting in the policy, So taxes

0:06:54.320 --> 0:06:58.040
<v Speaker 5>and bonds for municipalities. I did that for about a

0:06:58.120 --> 0:06:59.840
<v Speaker 5>year and a half, two years, and then I moved

0:06:59.839 --> 0:07:02.040
<v Speaker 5>in to deck capital markets for corporates, so kind of

0:07:02.080 --> 0:07:05.240
<v Speaker 5>an easy transition taxes and bonds to a corporate bonds.

0:07:05.920 --> 0:07:07.680
<v Speaker 5>And then I spent you know, the majority of my

0:07:07.760 --> 0:07:09.880
<v Speaker 5>earlier career, the first sixteen years of my career in

0:07:09.920 --> 0:07:11.840
<v Speaker 5>the investment bank in debt capital markets.

0:07:12.160 --> 0:07:16.040
<v Speaker 2>And just for the youngsters listening, twenty five or so

0:07:16.200 --> 0:07:21.200
<v Speaker 2>years ago, high rated municipal tax free bonds were yielding

0:07:21.440 --> 0:07:25.040
<v Speaker 2>five six percent maybe more, maybe more. Just those were

0:07:25.080 --> 0:07:28.239
<v Speaker 2>the before we start where I guess we're only halfway

0:07:28.240 --> 0:07:31.680
<v Speaker 2>through our forty year rate cutting cycle.

0:07:32.200 --> 0:07:33.960
<v Speaker 3>You could get tax re yield.

0:07:33.760 --> 0:07:37.000
<v Speaker 2>At seven percent imagine and a rated not jump.

0:07:37.400 --> 0:07:40.280
<v Speaker 3>Imagine what that was like totally all right, So so you.

0:07:40.200 --> 0:07:45.920
<v Speaker 2>Go from public finance, how did you evolve towards cohad

0:07:45.920 --> 0:07:47.040
<v Speaker 2>of innovation economy?

0:07:47.480 --> 0:07:49.880
<v Speaker 5>So was in a decent deck capital markets? I like

0:07:49.960 --> 0:07:52.360
<v Speaker 5>to say I grew up in deck capital markets, which,

0:07:52.440 --> 0:07:54.440
<v Speaker 5>as an aside, I think that was such a great

0:07:54.560 --> 0:07:58.160
<v Speaker 5>experience because you know, in DCM you're sitting on the

0:07:58.200 --> 0:08:01.600
<v Speaker 5>trading floor, right. Loved being in that environment because I

0:08:01.600 --> 0:08:04.040
<v Speaker 5>think it fosters learning so much more quickly. I literally

0:08:04.040 --> 0:08:06.760
<v Speaker 5>sat next to the managing director that I worked for

0:08:06.800 --> 0:08:08.880
<v Speaker 5>and listen on all the client calls and sort of

0:08:09.200 --> 0:08:12.080
<v Speaker 5>you understand much more quickly how to handle specific situations.

0:08:12.760 --> 0:08:15.640
<v Speaker 5>I also it was sort of an interesting dynamic where

0:08:15.800 --> 0:08:18.880
<v Speaker 5>you're on the private side, on the origination side, talking

0:08:18.920 --> 0:08:21.600
<v Speaker 5>to corporate clients and advising them about their next you know,

0:08:21.640 --> 0:08:24.680
<v Speaker 5>debt raise or their funding needs, but you have to

0:08:24.680 --> 0:08:26.680
<v Speaker 5>spend a lot of time with the traders who are

0:08:26.680 --> 0:08:29.240
<v Speaker 5>trading the bonds and the public markets, and they're obviously

0:08:29.320 --> 0:08:31.680
<v Speaker 5>on the public side, so you're sort of walled off, right,

0:08:31.760 --> 0:08:34.040
<v Speaker 5>But then you'd have to go over on to talk

0:08:34.040 --> 0:08:37.200
<v Speaker 5>to the traders, and sometimes you'd walk over there and

0:08:37.760 --> 0:08:39.920
<v Speaker 5>you need information from them, but they can't give you

0:08:39.920 --> 0:08:42.840
<v Speaker 5>any information, and so you'd walk over there and sometimes

0:08:42.840 --> 0:08:45.240
<v Speaker 5>they sort of look at you because they're busy, and

0:08:45.280 --> 0:08:46.959
<v Speaker 5>you sort of get this feeling, you know, get out

0:08:46.960 --> 0:08:49.319
<v Speaker 5>of my face, Well what do you want? So I

0:08:49.360 --> 0:08:51.840
<v Speaker 5>think it was an interesting experience because you have to

0:08:51.960 --> 0:08:55.559
<v Speaker 5>kind of, you know, gain some credibility with them, and

0:08:55.800 --> 0:08:59.079
<v Speaker 5>you know, ask insightful questions, show that you have some

0:08:59.120 --> 0:09:01.400
<v Speaker 5>sort of use. So I thought thought it was a

0:09:01.400 --> 0:09:02.760
<v Speaker 5>great way to kind of like grow up and learn

0:09:02.760 --> 0:09:06.320
<v Speaker 5>about the business. But again, was in DCM for sixteen years,

0:09:06.320 --> 0:09:08.320
<v Speaker 5>including three years that I was in London running our

0:09:08.360 --> 0:09:10.240
<v Speaker 5>European dek Coup of Markets business.

0:09:10.240 --> 0:09:12.280
<v Speaker 2>I got a lot of questions for you about Europe,

0:09:12.280 --> 0:09:14.720
<v Speaker 2>but we'll so back to that later. I'm looking at

0:09:14.720 --> 0:09:17.800
<v Speaker 2>my own handwriting twenty two or twenty seven years?

0:09:17.880 --> 0:09:18.920
<v Speaker 3>Is that twenty.

0:09:18.640 --> 0:09:19.600
<v Speaker 2>Seven years you've been there?

0:09:19.640 --> 0:09:22.079
<v Speaker 5>I think it's twenty six so going on twenty so

0:09:22.200 --> 0:09:24.200
<v Speaker 5>going on twenty seven now I feel old.

0:09:24.440 --> 0:09:25.160
<v Speaker 3>So it's not.

0:09:25.520 --> 0:09:29.079
<v Speaker 2>Well, what's more fascinating is and you started when you were,

0:09:29.240 --> 0:09:32.440
<v Speaker 2>you know, seventeen, so there got a big deal. But

0:09:33.040 --> 0:09:36.200
<v Speaker 2>you know, that's relatively rare these days to be at

0:09:36.600 --> 0:09:41.040
<v Speaker 2>any one firm for quarter plus century. What is so

0:09:41.120 --> 0:09:43.640
<v Speaker 2>special at JP Morgan? What's kept you there for so long?

0:09:43.880 --> 0:09:44.240
<v Speaker 4>Sure?

0:09:44.520 --> 0:09:47.400
<v Speaker 5>So first I would say you will actually find many

0:09:47.440 --> 0:09:49.280
<v Speaker 5>senior people at JP Morgan who have been there for

0:09:49.320 --> 0:09:51.280
<v Speaker 5>twenty years plus, and I think that is obviously a

0:09:51.320 --> 0:09:54.319
<v Speaker 5>great testament to the culture that we have at the firm. Secondly,

0:09:54.320 --> 0:09:57.160
<v Speaker 5>I would say JP Morgan is a large place, clearly,

0:09:57.280 --> 0:09:59.679
<v Speaker 5>and what that means is there are multiple lines of

0:09:59.679 --> 0:10:01.640
<v Speaker 5>business with many different things that you can do over

0:10:01.679 --> 0:10:05.200
<v Speaker 5>the course of your career. And generally speaking, we are

0:10:05.520 --> 0:10:07.520
<v Speaker 5>sort of number one or number two in everything that

0:10:07.559 --> 0:10:10.000
<v Speaker 5>we do, which which again is a great privilege to

0:10:10.040 --> 0:10:12.280
<v Speaker 5>work there from that perspective, so it doesn't make a

0:10:12.320 --> 0:10:15.040
<v Speaker 5>lot of sense to go necessarily to another firm when

0:10:15.040 --> 0:10:16.720
<v Speaker 5>you're sort of trading down, if you will.

0:10:16.720 --> 0:10:19.080
<v Speaker 4>In some instances maybe I shouldn't say that the way.

0:10:18.920 --> 0:10:21.439
<v Speaker 5>But and so I think what's cut me there is,

0:10:21.640 --> 0:10:24.120
<v Speaker 5>you know, a just the opportunity to do many different things,

0:10:24.200 --> 0:10:27.400
<v Speaker 5>learn about many other aspects of the business. And two,

0:10:27.880 --> 0:10:30.640
<v Speaker 5>you know, obviously you know very much appreciate kind of

0:10:30.640 --> 0:10:32.840
<v Speaker 5>the culture and environment at JP Morgan kind of back

0:10:32.880 --> 0:10:35.000
<v Speaker 5>to that's why people stay there for so long. It's

0:10:35.000 --> 0:10:38.760
<v Speaker 5>a very team morek oriented environment. You know, we like

0:10:38.800 --> 0:10:40.960
<v Speaker 5>to quote JP Morgan first class business in a first

0:10:40.960 --> 0:10:44.200
<v Speaker 5>class way. We take that very seriously and just appreciated

0:10:44.280 --> 0:10:45.120
<v Speaker 5>that about the environment.

0:10:45.400 --> 0:10:49.000
<v Speaker 2>So let's talk about your dual role, your your cohead

0:10:49.000 --> 0:10:53.400
<v Speaker 2>of Innovation Economy and your head of specialized industries. Tell

0:10:53.480 --> 0:10:55.559
<v Speaker 2>us what each of those roles encompass.

0:10:55.800 --> 0:11:00.360
<v Speaker 5>Sure, so our specialized Industry's business sits within our our

0:11:00.400 --> 0:11:02.840
<v Speaker 5>middle market business, and just to define that middle market

0:11:02.960 --> 0:11:05.760
<v Speaker 5>sort of means in the commercial banking, right, so anything

0:11:05.800 --> 0:11:08.000
<v Speaker 5>from kind of a very early stage startup to a

0:11:08.040 --> 0:11:10.000
<v Speaker 5>company that's up to two billion in top line revenue,

0:11:10.000 --> 0:11:11.719
<v Speaker 5>so kind of a very wide wide readmit.

0:11:11.520 --> 0:11:12.320
<v Speaker 4>If you will.

0:11:12.440 --> 0:11:15.280
<v Speaker 5>About half of that business is the industry business that

0:11:15.360 --> 0:11:18.320
<v Speaker 5>I run, So I have nineteen different industry teams, so

0:11:18.400 --> 0:11:21.480
<v Speaker 5>bankers that are experts in those specific industries to provide

0:11:21.520 --> 0:11:24.280
<v Speaker 5>obviously coverage to clients in those industries. And I would

0:11:24.320 --> 0:11:26.200
<v Speaker 5>just say, I mean, we are just a big believer

0:11:26.440 --> 0:11:32.520
<v Speaker 5>in the the you know, better coverage and better that

0:11:32.559 --> 0:11:35.240
<v Speaker 5>we can much better serve a client when our bankers

0:11:35.280 --> 0:11:38.280
<v Speaker 5>have that expertise in terms of the industry. So we're

0:11:38.360 --> 0:11:40.920
<v Speaker 5>kind of very big believers in industry expertise and kind

0:11:40.920 --> 0:11:43.680
<v Speaker 5>of hyper segmentation in terms of covering companies at different

0:11:44.000 --> 0:11:47.240
<v Speaker 5>stages and sizes in their life cycle. So nineteen different industries.

0:11:47.280 --> 0:11:49.720
<v Speaker 5>Innovation economy is basically a part of that, and we

0:11:49.880 --> 0:11:54.119
<v Speaker 5>use that innovation economy kind of umbrella term to describe

0:11:54.200 --> 0:11:57.440
<v Speaker 5>tech early stage tech, life sciences, health tech, climate tech

0:11:57.480 --> 0:12:02.080
<v Speaker 5>businesses which are generally making high growth VC backs businesses overall.

0:12:02.280 --> 0:12:04.520
<v Speaker 2>Well, let's talk a little bit about that. I'm familiar

0:12:04.559 --> 0:12:07.720
<v Speaker 2>with a lot of the companies that vcs tend to back.

0:12:08.800 --> 0:12:12.000
<v Speaker 2>But one of the things that we've been noticing very

0:12:12.040 --> 0:12:15.360
<v Speaker 2>obviously over the past few years is the amount of

0:12:16.240 --> 0:12:21.760
<v Speaker 2>not venture income, but either private equity or private debt.

0:12:22.400 --> 0:12:26.000
<v Speaker 2>How does that play out in the companies you're servicing.

0:12:25.760 --> 0:12:27.640
<v Speaker 4>Absolutely two really important trends.

0:12:27.679 --> 0:12:31.079
<v Speaker 5>So I would say so within the innovation economy, to

0:12:31.120 --> 0:12:32.719
<v Speaker 5>your point, a lot of the companies tend to be

0:12:32.800 --> 0:12:36.040
<v Speaker 5>VC backed, but there definitely is growing growing sort of

0:12:36.080 --> 0:12:38.920
<v Speaker 5>crossover into into growth equity funds. I think in the

0:12:38.920 --> 0:12:42.079
<v Speaker 5>middle market commercial banking business as a whole, there has

0:12:42.160 --> 0:12:45.040
<v Speaker 5>been a ton of activity from the financial sponsor community,

0:12:45.120 --> 0:12:47.360
<v Speaker 5>so a ton of consolidation of those middle market businesses.

0:12:47.400 --> 0:12:49.200
<v Speaker 5>And when you just look at sort of the levels

0:12:49.200 --> 0:12:51.520
<v Speaker 5>of activity, like what are sponsors buying, it is within

0:12:51.559 --> 0:12:53.599
<v Speaker 5>that middle market space. So that has definitely driven a

0:12:53.600 --> 0:12:56.160
<v Speaker 5>lot of activity overall and something that we spend a

0:12:56.160 --> 0:13:00.400
<v Speaker 5>lot of time talking about with with our clients. And

0:13:00.440 --> 0:13:02.960
<v Speaker 5>then secondly, to your point, on the private credit direct

0:13:03.040 --> 0:13:05.800
<v Speaker 5>lending side, that also has been just a massive trend

0:13:05.960 --> 0:13:08.240
<v Speaker 5>impacting sort of that part of the business with these

0:13:08.280 --> 0:13:11.360
<v Speaker 5>companies looking for alternative sources of capital and direct lending

0:13:11.400 --> 0:13:15.079
<v Speaker 5>being a great, a great alternative. That's in fact why

0:13:15.400 --> 0:13:17.640
<v Speaker 5>we as a firm sort of developed our own direct

0:13:17.679 --> 0:13:20.800
<v Speaker 5>lending capability a couple of years ago. And I think

0:13:20.640 --> 0:13:22.560
<v Speaker 5>the great benefit of that is again we sort of

0:13:22.559 --> 0:13:25.600
<v Speaker 5>pride ourselves on being kind of financing our product agnostic. Right,

0:13:25.600 --> 0:13:27.520
<v Speaker 5>we can do a traditional bank loan, we can do

0:13:27.600 --> 0:13:30.160
<v Speaker 5>sort of a sort of you know, public execution and

0:13:30.240 --> 0:13:32.160
<v Speaker 5>the public debt markets, or we can do a direct

0:13:32.200 --> 0:13:35.199
<v Speaker 5>lending transaction sort of whatever best fits the company's objectives.

0:13:35.200 --> 0:13:36.120
<v Speaker 4>We can sort of do it all.

0:13:36.320 --> 0:13:39.640
<v Speaker 2>So let's talk about that, because you know, part of

0:13:39.679 --> 0:13:44.400
<v Speaker 2>your job description is delivering a cohesive banking experience to

0:13:44.559 --> 0:13:48.240
<v Speaker 2>fast growing companies. So the two different divisions that you're

0:13:48.679 --> 0:13:53.560
<v Speaker 2>running head or cohed innovation Economy and specialized industries obviously

0:13:53.600 --> 0:13:57.480
<v Speaker 2>have to work together. What other divisions at JP Morgan

0:13:57.600 --> 0:13:58.920
<v Speaker 2>are you collaborating with?

0:13:59.080 --> 0:13:59.360
<v Speaker 4>Sure?

0:13:59.840 --> 0:14:03.520
<v Speaker 5>I would say just generally we collaborate across the firm

0:14:03.640 --> 0:14:06.319
<v Speaker 5>and everything that we do. So the commercial bank is

0:14:06.440 --> 0:14:09.320
<v Speaker 5>very broadly speaking, regardless of industry, regardless of what aspect

0:14:09.320 --> 0:14:11.720
<v Speaker 5>of the commercial bank we're talking about. We're constantly working

0:14:11.760 --> 0:14:15.079
<v Speaker 5>with our partners in the investment bank when companies need

0:14:15.160 --> 0:14:19.880
<v Speaker 5>obviously excuse me, strategic capital raising M and a advisory

0:14:19.920 --> 0:14:21.960
<v Speaker 5>whatever the case may be. So we're constantly kind of

0:14:22.000 --> 0:14:24.440
<v Speaker 5>working in conjunction with one another. And at the same

0:14:24.480 --> 0:14:27.000
<v Speaker 5>time we are often working with our asset management colleagues

0:14:27.000 --> 0:14:29.160
<v Speaker 5>when companies have you know, large cash balances that they

0:14:29.200 --> 0:14:32.120
<v Speaker 5>need to invest, and our private banking colleagues. And I

0:14:32.120 --> 0:14:35.320
<v Speaker 5>think a good example of that is within the innovation

0:14:35.400 --> 0:14:40.000
<v Speaker 5>economy kind of ecosystem overall, where because it is so interconnected.

0:14:40.040 --> 0:14:43.880
<v Speaker 5>When you think about VC firms funding you know, portfolio companies,

0:14:44.080 --> 0:14:47.600
<v Speaker 5>those portfolio companies having founders, they're oftentimes there repeat founders.

0:14:47.880 --> 0:14:50.360
<v Speaker 5>It's important that you can serve sort of the needs

0:14:50.360 --> 0:14:53.320
<v Speaker 5>of that entire, very interconnected ecosystem.

0:14:53.680 --> 0:14:54.840
<v Speaker 4>So bankers on my.

0:14:54.880 --> 0:14:57.960
<v Speaker 5>Team, on the Innovation Economy team are serving those portfolio

0:14:57.960 --> 0:15:00.680
<v Speaker 5>companies right But at the same time we're working with

0:15:00.720 --> 0:15:03.600
<v Speaker 5>our colleagues and asset management and the private bank who

0:15:03.640 --> 0:15:07.320
<v Speaker 5>bank the VC firms themselves and bank the VC partners

0:15:07.360 --> 0:15:09.240
<v Speaker 5>and the founders for their private wealth needs.

0:15:09.320 --> 0:15:11.120
<v Speaker 4>So our objective is to deliver sort of.

0:15:11.080 --> 0:15:14.640
<v Speaker 5>All the needs of the ecosystem, and that's why sort

0:15:14.640 --> 0:15:16.960
<v Speaker 5>of by definition, we're always working across lines of business.

0:15:17.160 --> 0:15:20.480
<v Speaker 2>So really what you're saying is from a checking account

0:15:21.080 --> 0:15:25.080
<v Speaker 2>up to a secondary financing, private debt, up to an

0:15:25.160 --> 0:15:29.160
<v Speaker 2>IPO and even beyond that if there's an acquisition or

0:15:29.160 --> 0:15:33.520
<v Speaker 2>a merger. You guys are full service not only commercial bank,

0:15:33.560 --> 0:15:34.520
<v Speaker 2>but investment bank.

0:15:34.840 --> 0:15:38.080
<v Speaker 3>There really is in any space that you.

0:15:38.080 --> 0:15:43.320
<v Speaker 2>Guys can't play in and service exactly what a fast

0:15:43.320 --> 0:15:44.840
<v Speaker 2>growing startup needs exactly.

0:15:44.960 --> 0:15:47.760
<v Speaker 5>You said it perfectly, and as I often like to say,

0:15:47.880 --> 0:15:50.680
<v Speaker 5>we serve companies from startup to IPO and beyond, and

0:15:50.720 --> 0:15:53.280
<v Speaker 5>so you know, again, we believe we're really one of

0:15:53.280 --> 0:15:55.800
<v Speaker 5>the few firms who can actually serve every.

0:15:55.720 --> 0:15:58.640
<v Speaker 4>Need of these companies. And again they're the founders themselves.

0:15:58.800 --> 0:16:00.280
<v Speaker 3>Huh. Really really interesting thing.

0:16:00.800 --> 0:16:03.760
<v Speaker 2>So let's talk a little bit about middle market banking.

0:16:04.360 --> 0:16:08.200
<v Speaker 2>You referred earlier the definition of middle market banking as

0:16:08.480 --> 0:16:11.640
<v Speaker 2>up to two billion in revenues.

0:16:11.200 --> 0:16:12.000
<v Speaker 4>Top line running.

0:16:12.040 --> 0:16:14.920
<v Speaker 2>So that's this is not a little These are not

0:16:15.080 --> 0:16:18.000
<v Speaker 2>all little companies. That's a two billion in revenue is

0:16:18.000 --> 0:16:19.880
<v Speaker 2>a pretty decent sized company.

0:16:19.720 --> 0:16:23.960
<v Speaker 5>Absolutely, and again we have teams focused on the smaller size.

0:16:23.960 --> 0:16:25.200
<v Speaker 4>What we call emerging middle market.

0:16:25.280 --> 0:16:26.760
<v Speaker 5>So think about that's kind of twenty million to one

0:16:26.800 --> 0:16:29.560
<v Speaker 5>hundred million in top line revenue, innovation economy doing the

0:16:29.640 --> 0:16:32.960
<v Speaker 5>high growth, you know, VC backed startups, and then a

0:16:33.000 --> 0:16:36.160
<v Speaker 5>bunch of different industries obviously within kind of that broader

0:16:36.160 --> 0:16:39.280
<v Speaker 5>commercial banking universe and bankers that are focused simply on

0:16:39.280 --> 0:16:41.000
<v Speaker 5>one hundred million and plus in top line.

0:16:40.840 --> 0:16:44.960
<v Speaker 2>Revenue's that's really interesting. And we've talked earlier about the

0:16:45.040 --> 0:16:48.680
<v Speaker 2>role of venture banking in this Where does that fit in,

0:16:48.720 --> 0:16:51.640
<v Speaker 2>Where does venture capital fin into startups, and where does

0:16:52.480 --> 0:16:55.640
<v Speaker 2>venture banking fit in as companies get a little.

0:16:55.480 --> 0:16:59.680
<v Speaker 5>Larger generally speaking, And our objective is to really become

0:16:59.840 --> 0:17:03.400
<v Speaker 5>the company's primary operating bank and trusted advisor from the

0:17:03.480 --> 0:17:06.120
<v Speaker 5>very beginning, right, And so as an example of that,

0:17:06.160 --> 0:17:08.520
<v Speaker 5>we now have a startup banking team that actually covers

0:17:08.520 --> 0:17:11.560
<v Speaker 5>companies at pre seed and seed stage, so oftentime, could

0:17:11.640 --> 0:17:13.960
<v Speaker 5>be before they've even raised an institutional.

0:17:13.560 --> 0:17:14.240
<v Speaker 4>Round of capital.

0:17:15.080 --> 0:17:16.960
<v Speaker 5>And at that point in time, their needs are very

0:17:17.000 --> 0:17:19.359
<v Speaker 5>sort of simple, if you will, right, They need a

0:17:19.359 --> 0:17:21.360
<v Speaker 5>bank account, they need to pay their employees, they need

0:17:21.359 --> 0:17:23.080
<v Speaker 5>to have a way to sort of collect funds. They

0:17:23.119 --> 0:17:25.800
<v Speaker 5>may need a credit card, just very simple banking needs,

0:17:26.119 --> 0:17:28.760
<v Speaker 5>and then obviously as the companies you know continue to grow,

0:17:28.880 --> 0:17:31.960
<v Speaker 5>those needs become more complex over time, including the need

0:17:32.000 --> 0:17:35.800
<v Speaker 5>to either raise additional capital and whether that be from

0:17:36.000 --> 0:17:37.880
<v Speaker 5>a venture capital fund or whoever that may.

0:17:38.119 --> 0:17:38.760
<v Speaker 4>Be coming from.

0:17:39.400 --> 0:17:42.119
<v Speaker 5>They may need some debt financing, and sort of on

0:17:42.200 --> 0:17:45.000
<v Speaker 5>and on and on in terms of what they ultimately

0:17:45.040 --> 0:17:46.960
<v Speaker 5>need to achieve their objectives and kind of become the

0:17:46.960 --> 0:17:48.000
<v Speaker 5>company that they want to become.

0:17:48.400 --> 0:17:51.480
<v Speaker 2>So what's the split between the companies you work with

0:17:51.520 --> 0:17:54.280
<v Speaker 2>that are VC funded, that are private equity backed, or

0:17:54.840 --> 0:17:57.520
<v Speaker 2>just bootstrapped by the founders themselves.

0:17:57.800 --> 0:17:59.800
<v Speaker 5>So I would say again it very it would very

0:18:00.200 --> 0:18:02.879
<v Speaker 5>significantly depending on the industries that we're talking about. But

0:18:02.880 --> 0:18:06.000
<v Speaker 5>I if just we focus on the innovation economy business specifically,

0:18:06.440 --> 0:18:09.000
<v Speaker 5>the vast majority of those are going to be VC backed.

0:18:09.560 --> 0:18:11.680
<v Speaker 5>As I mentioned, of course, you know sort of the

0:18:12.000 --> 0:18:14.160
<v Speaker 5>crossover if you will, between growth of equity and VC.

0:18:14.280 --> 0:18:16.359
<v Speaker 5>The lines continue to get blurred, But I would say

0:18:16.359 --> 0:18:18.560
<v Speaker 5>about twentysh percent of the business is sort of PE

0:18:18.600 --> 0:18:21.400
<v Speaker 5>backed and the rest is VC back. Just brought broad numbers.

0:18:21.440 --> 0:18:23.320
<v Speaker 2>Bootstrapping still goes on, or is that.

0:18:23.359 --> 0:18:24.000
<v Speaker 4>It does again?

0:18:24.040 --> 0:18:26.760
<v Speaker 5>And you see that you know, certainly at the sort

0:18:26.800 --> 0:18:28.560
<v Speaker 5>of preceed and seed stage and then but I would

0:18:28.560 --> 0:18:31.440
<v Speaker 5>say it's still it's a minority, right of the larger

0:18:31.480 --> 0:18:32.960
<v Speaker 5>companies within the innovation economy.

0:18:33.200 --> 0:18:37.560
<v Speaker 2>So I'm thinking about their balance sheet, what's the split

0:18:37.640 --> 0:18:40.280
<v Speaker 2>between how much is equity, how much is debt or

0:18:40.359 --> 0:18:42.800
<v Speaker 2>do you do a combination of debt and equity?

0:18:42.840 --> 0:18:44.600
<v Speaker 3>What does this look like today?

0:18:44.680 --> 0:18:44.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah?

0:18:44.880 --> 0:18:48.840
<v Speaker 5>No, absolutely so Again, the whole purpose of having a

0:18:48.880 --> 0:18:51.320
<v Speaker 5>partner like JP Morgan is that a we can sort

0:18:51.320 --> 0:18:54.040
<v Speaker 5>of help the companies think through what the optimal capital

0:18:54.080 --> 0:18:55.960
<v Speaker 5>structure is and back to sort of the point of

0:18:56.000 --> 0:18:58.240
<v Speaker 5>we're sort of product agnostic, depending on what the company

0:18:58.359 --> 0:19:01.360
<v Speaker 5>choose to do. Most of these companies that are high

0:19:01.440 --> 0:19:04.040
<v Speaker 5>growth VC backed in what we call the innovation economy

0:19:04.080 --> 0:19:06.680
<v Speaker 5>business tend to still be pre profit, right. They're growing

0:19:06.720 --> 0:19:09.240
<v Speaker 5>really rapidly. They're throwing everything back into the business in

0:19:09.320 --> 0:19:11.800
<v Speaker 5>order to achieve scale. So for the most part, their

0:19:11.920 --> 0:19:14.960
<v Speaker 5>use of debt is quite small, usually some kind of

0:19:14.960 --> 0:19:19.240
<v Speaker 5>small venture debt component, and we really want to work

0:19:19.240 --> 0:19:21.480
<v Speaker 5>with those companies to think about when is the right

0:19:21.520 --> 0:19:24.000
<v Speaker 5>time to put debt in their capital structure, depending again

0:19:24.040 --> 0:19:25.800
<v Speaker 5>on where they are and sort of that life cycle,

0:19:25.920 --> 0:19:28.679
<v Speaker 5>and depending on sort of what their cash burn looks like,

0:19:28.760 --> 0:19:31.040
<v Speaker 5>how close they are to the next capital raise, what

0:19:31.160 --> 0:19:32.840
<v Speaker 5>is the likelihood that they're actually going to be able

0:19:32.840 --> 0:19:34.800
<v Speaker 5>to raise the next round of capital. So it is

0:19:34.840 --> 0:19:37.880
<v Speaker 5>a combination of both, but again, the majority of their

0:19:37.880 --> 0:19:40.119
<v Speaker 5>capital structure is definitively going to be equity given that

0:19:40.160 --> 0:19:42.560
<v Speaker 5>they're cash burning companies generally speaking.

0:19:42.640 --> 0:19:46.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and I'm assuming you're not involved in angel rounds

0:19:46.760 --> 0:19:50.520
<v Speaker 2>or very early seed stuff, which kind of leads me

0:19:50.600 --> 0:19:54.040
<v Speaker 2>to what sort of criteria does your team use when

0:19:54.040 --> 0:19:56.720
<v Speaker 2>you're trying to figure out, Hey, is this an early

0:19:56.760 --> 0:19:59.400
<v Speaker 2>stage company that we want to have a banking relationship.

0:20:00.080 --> 0:20:01.680
<v Speaker 3>Can we be value add to them?

0:20:01.760 --> 0:20:07.840
<v Speaker 2>Or they still too novel, too green, no business, no revenue, Like,

0:20:08.160 --> 0:20:09.960
<v Speaker 2>how do what sort of corterity do you use it?

0:20:10.400 --> 0:20:13.680
<v Speaker 5>So I think about it as as quite as a pyramid.

0:20:13.880 --> 0:20:16.159
<v Speaker 5>So there is a lot that we can do for

0:20:16.280 --> 0:20:19.600
<v Speaker 5>companies across, you know, all stages of their life cycle.

0:20:19.800 --> 0:20:21.840
<v Speaker 5>But when you're talking about the very earliest stages back

0:20:21.880 --> 0:20:24.720
<v Speaker 5>to they have fairly simplistic needs, right, and so we

0:20:24.760 --> 0:20:26.919
<v Speaker 5>want to be able to bank and can bank as

0:20:26.960 --> 0:20:30.320
<v Speaker 5>many of those companies as possible, assuming that you know,

0:20:30.359 --> 0:20:34.360
<v Speaker 5>there's we don't find anything from a reputational risk perspective

0:20:34.400 --> 0:20:37.639
<v Speaker 5>or something or an industry that we think is challenging.

0:20:37.880 --> 0:20:41.119
<v Speaker 5>But I think again, becoming their primary operating bank, helping

0:20:41.160 --> 0:20:43.679
<v Speaker 5>them optimize their working capital is sort of like the

0:20:43.680 --> 0:20:45.760
<v Speaker 5>biggest challenge that these companies are. Not the biggest challenge,

0:20:45.800 --> 0:20:47.439
<v Speaker 5>but one of the challenges that these companies face. So

0:20:47.480 --> 0:20:50.919
<v Speaker 5>we can bank in terms of providing a bank account,

0:20:51.000 --> 0:20:55.120
<v Speaker 5>credit card again, sort of payables, receivables, many, many, many companies.

0:20:55.640 --> 0:20:57.680
<v Speaker 5>As we think about which are the companies we're going

0:20:57.720 --> 0:21:00.679
<v Speaker 5>to lend to, right, which is a sort of the

0:21:00.720 --> 0:21:03.879
<v Speaker 5>next round of the pyramid, if you will, and that's

0:21:04.119 --> 0:21:09.440
<v Speaker 5>we obviously need to really assess their sustainability over time,

0:21:09.800 --> 0:21:12.440
<v Speaker 5>their ability to raise the next round of capital, because

0:21:12.440 --> 0:21:15.520
<v Speaker 5>when you think about venture debt, that's really one of

0:21:15.520 --> 0:21:18.120
<v Speaker 5>the gating factors. Is this company going to be able

0:21:18.119 --> 0:21:19.920
<v Speaker 5>to raise the next round of capital, what's the cash

0:21:19.960 --> 0:21:21.880
<v Speaker 5>burn look like to obviously get them to that next

0:21:21.880 --> 0:21:24.000
<v Speaker 5>capital raise, and how are they using debt to sort

0:21:24.000 --> 0:21:25.560
<v Speaker 5>of extend that runway overall?

0:21:25.920 --> 0:21:27.240
<v Speaker 4>So those are sort of the types.

0:21:27.040 --> 0:21:29.000
<v Speaker 5>Of things that we're thinking about when we think about

0:21:29.080 --> 0:21:31.879
<v Speaker 5>which of those companies that are sort of credit worthy

0:21:31.920 --> 0:21:34.640
<v Speaker 5>for us to be lending to and obviously support them

0:21:34.680 --> 0:21:37.800
<v Speaker 5>to again get to the next roundcap really interesting.

0:21:38.240 --> 0:21:43.280
<v Speaker 2>So I have a recollection of the era following the

0:21:43.320 --> 0:21:46.520
<v Speaker 2>dot com ramp up and then the crash in two

0:21:46.600 --> 0:21:50.199
<v Speaker 2>thousand and it felt like a lot of the major

0:21:50.240 --> 0:21:53.960
<v Speaker 2>banks had moved up market, like the middle market was

0:21:54.080 --> 0:21:58.680
<v Speaker 2>kind of abandoned, so and lots of private equity seem

0:21:58.760 --> 0:22:01.359
<v Speaker 2>to have filled that gap. So kind of fascinated that

0:22:01.440 --> 0:22:06.560
<v Speaker 2>a giant bank like JP Morgan is addressing that same

0:22:07.320 --> 0:22:11.520
<v Speaker 2>market segment that generally people seem to have feel like

0:22:11.640 --> 0:22:14.919
<v Speaker 2>the bigger Wall Street banks have abandoned. You're telling me

0:22:15.560 --> 0:22:16.560
<v Speaker 2>you're focusing in that.

0:22:16.560 --> 0:22:20.560
<v Speaker 5>Space absolutely, because I think, and i'll again kind of

0:22:20.560 --> 0:22:22.720
<v Speaker 5>focus on two segments, if you will, kind of just

0:22:22.720 --> 0:22:25.159
<v Speaker 5>the broader commercial banking business and then the innovation economy

0:22:25.200 --> 0:22:27.720
<v Speaker 5>of business. Specifically, when you think about the broader commercial

0:22:27.720 --> 0:22:30.439
<v Speaker 5>banking business, right, so not just high growth VC backed companies,

0:22:30.480 --> 0:22:35.120
<v Speaker 5>but small businesses overall. Right, there are three hundred thousand,

0:22:35.240 --> 0:22:39.800
<v Speaker 5>you know, small businesses across across the country that represent

0:22:39.920 --> 0:22:44.000
<v Speaker 5>you know, thirteen trillion in revenues and employee forty million people, right,

0:22:44.040 --> 0:22:46.920
<v Speaker 5>So it is a massive part of the economy overall

0:22:47.000 --> 0:22:48.880
<v Speaker 5>that we very much want to serve, and we've been

0:22:48.880 --> 0:22:53.520
<v Speaker 5>expanding that business quite substantially, mainly through sort of geographic

0:22:53.600 --> 0:22:56.600
<v Speaker 5>expansion over the course of the last several years. We

0:22:56.680 --> 0:22:59.639
<v Speaker 5>serve you know, thirty two thousand middle market companies today

0:23:00.000 --> 0:23:03.280
<v Speaker 5>across our commercial bank. So certainly, again there's back to

0:23:03.400 --> 0:23:05.119
<v Speaker 5>a lot that we want to do and can do

0:23:05.240 --> 0:23:07.320
<v Speaker 5>to support small business as kind of an engine of

0:23:07.359 --> 0:23:10.840
<v Speaker 5>the economy overall that we very much think is there's

0:23:10.840 --> 0:23:12.880
<v Speaker 5>an opportunity there for us, but it's also sort of a.

0:23:12.840 --> 0:23:14.920
<v Speaker 4>Responsibility right for us to serve those businesses.

0:23:15.160 --> 0:23:17.639
<v Speaker 5>I think on the innovation economy side, just back to

0:23:18.359 --> 0:23:20.600
<v Speaker 5>how I mean when you look at the disruption going

0:23:20.600 --> 0:23:24.080
<v Speaker 5>on across every industry today and the innovation, JP Morigan

0:23:24.119 --> 0:23:26.280
<v Speaker 5>clearly wants to be there to support those founders with

0:23:26.359 --> 0:23:29.080
<v Speaker 5>sort of the next innovative idea. And I always like

0:23:29.160 --> 0:23:30.879
<v Speaker 5>to point to the fact that you know, we've been

0:23:30.920 --> 0:23:34.480
<v Speaker 5>serving innovative companies literally for over two hundred years when

0:23:34.520 --> 0:23:36.680
<v Speaker 5>you look back at our history, right, we supported Thomas

0:23:36.800 --> 0:23:38.800
<v Speaker 5>Edison and the invention of the light bulb, the railroads,

0:23:38.800 --> 0:23:42.399
<v Speaker 5>the automobile like those were disruptors at that time. But

0:23:42.480 --> 0:23:47.080
<v Speaker 5>I think on the innovation economy business specifically, when we

0:23:47.200 --> 0:23:49.240
<v Speaker 5>first started, I'll give you a little history of the business.

0:23:49.320 --> 0:23:52.080
<v Speaker 5>When we first sort of started a dedicated focus. So

0:23:52.080 --> 0:23:54.440
<v Speaker 5>we had always served early stage tech companies in the

0:23:54.440 --> 0:23:56.800
<v Speaker 5>commercial bank, but just by sort of a local banker

0:23:56.840 --> 0:23:57.360
<v Speaker 5>that didn't.

0:23:57.200 --> 0:23:59.880
<v Speaker 4>Have any expertise in tech. Right, they cover all industries.

0:24:00.160 --> 0:24:02.399
<v Speaker 5>So back in twenty sixteen twenty seventeen, we put in

0:24:02.400 --> 0:24:04.879
<v Speaker 5>place sort of a dedicated team of bankers. At that

0:24:04.960 --> 0:24:08.320
<v Speaker 5>point in time, I would say we primarily did. We

0:24:08.320 --> 0:24:10.600
<v Speaker 5>were very good in terms of our capabilities at serving

0:24:10.640 --> 0:24:12.800
<v Speaker 5>let's call it kind of series C and beyond right,

0:24:13.160 --> 0:24:15.960
<v Speaker 5>And when I came into this role, we very much

0:24:16.119 --> 0:24:18.880
<v Speaker 5>noticed that a founder right and for their company would

0:24:18.920 --> 0:24:21.679
<v Speaker 5>walk into a Chase branch, they'd open a bank account,

0:24:21.840 --> 0:24:25.679
<v Speaker 5>and then they would quickly leave that Chase branch and

0:24:25.760 --> 0:24:27.960
<v Speaker 5>move to one of our competitors who were very good

0:24:27.960 --> 0:24:31.480
<v Speaker 5>at serving early stage, high growth, early stage VC back companies,

0:24:31.560 --> 0:24:33.439
<v Speaker 5>and then they'd come back to us at sort of

0:24:33.440 --> 0:24:36.719
<v Speaker 5>series C right generalization. So when I came into this

0:24:36.840 --> 0:24:40.280
<v Speaker 5>role sort of said, what are we missing? Right in

0:24:40.320 --> 0:24:42.600
<v Speaker 5>that very early stage in terms of our capabilities, Like,

0:24:42.680 --> 0:24:44.960
<v Speaker 5>let's skip that part where they leave the JP Morgan

0:24:45.040 --> 0:24:48.120
<v Speaker 5>sort of franchise, right, And really what we were missing

0:24:48.320 --> 0:24:52.879
<v Speaker 5>was sort of a very simplified treasury what we call

0:24:52.920 --> 0:24:56.880
<v Speaker 5>treasury kind of payments bundle for companies to manage working capital,

0:24:57.320 --> 0:25:00.200
<v Speaker 5>a simple digital platform for earlier stage companies, and a

0:25:00.280 --> 0:25:03.080
<v Speaker 5>venture de capability. And that's what we really built out

0:25:03.160 --> 0:25:05.760
<v Speaker 5>sort of from kind of twenty seventeen twenty eighteen over

0:25:05.800 --> 0:25:07.600
<v Speaker 5>the course of the past several years, so that we

0:25:07.880 --> 0:25:11.240
<v Speaker 5>had best in class capabilities both for early stage companies

0:25:11.280 --> 0:25:13.400
<v Speaker 5>as well as late stage companies where everybody thinks about

0:25:13.440 --> 0:25:15.120
<v Speaker 5>JP Morgan is serving later stage.

0:25:15.200 --> 0:25:19.000
<v Speaker 2>So you mentioned earlier that you're expanding geographically. We'll talk

0:25:19.040 --> 0:25:22.320
<v Speaker 2>about international in a few minutes, but let's stay in

0:25:22.400 --> 0:25:25.560
<v Speaker 2>the United States for a bit. I think of JP

0:25:25.640 --> 0:25:29.240
<v Speaker 2>Morgan down on Wall Street, very New York based. What

0:25:29.359 --> 0:25:32.240
<v Speaker 2>geographies have you been expanding to. What parts of the

0:25:32.280 --> 0:25:35.320
<v Speaker 2>country seem to be very fast growing these days?

0:25:35.440 --> 0:25:35.840
<v Speaker 4>Sure?

0:25:35.960 --> 0:25:39.480
<v Speaker 5>Well, so I would just say today our commercial banking business,

0:25:39.560 --> 0:25:42.800
<v Speaker 5>you know, is in the eighty five you know, fastest

0:25:42.800 --> 0:25:45.199
<v Speaker 5>growing top sort of msas across the country. We have

0:25:45.200 --> 0:25:48.000
<v Speaker 5>one hundred and twenty five offices across the country, two

0:25:48.119 --> 0:25:51.760
<v Speaker 5>thousand plus bankers across the country. A big part of

0:25:51.760 --> 0:25:54.600
<v Speaker 5>that expansion over really the last decade has been sort

0:25:54.640 --> 0:25:58.199
<v Speaker 5>of California in the West coast overall, where we prior

0:25:58.240 --> 0:26:00.800
<v Speaker 5>to the Wallmu acquisition didn't have a ton of sort

0:26:00.800 --> 0:26:03.119
<v Speaker 5>of like retail presence and or sort of boots on

0:26:03.160 --> 0:26:05.199
<v Speaker 5>the ground there. So that's accounted for a lot of

0:26:05.240 --> 0:26:08.480
<v Speaker 5>that geographic expansion as well as you know, expansion into

0:26:08.520 --> 0:26:12.200
<v Speaker 5>the Southeast and sort of other states in the West obviously,

0:26:12.240 --> 0:26:14.919
<v Speaker 5>sort of moving from what historically, you know, decades and

0:26:14.920 --> 0:26:16.640
<v Speaker 5>decades ago, was more of an kind of East Coast

0:26:16.680 --> 0:26:18.879
<v Speaker 5>dominated business, and that's what's accounted for a lot of

0:26:18.920 --> 0:26:20.440
<v Speaker 5>the growth within the business as a whole.

0:26:20.640 --> 0:26:24.199
<v Speaker 2>What about down south places like Charlotte or Nashville, or

0:26:24.240 --> 0:26:25.360
<v Speaker 2>Texas or Florida.

0:26:26.000 --> 0:26:28.919
<v Speaker 5>Absolutely, I mean when you look at again kind of

0:26:28.960 --> 0:26:32.719
<v Speaker 5>depends on the industry, but when you look at the

0:26:32.720 --> 0:26:35.240
<v Speaker 5>innovation economy business and kind of where some of the

0:26:35.760 --> 0:26:38.640
<v Speaker 5>newer markets are. From a VC funding perspective, you are

0:26:38.680 --> 0:26:42.400
<v Speaker 5>seeing a lot of growth in you know, the Phillies

0:26:42.440 --> 0:26:45.159
<v Speaker 5>of the world, the DC's of the world, you know,

0:26:45.280 --> 0:26:48.440
<v Speaker 5>San Diego. I mean, certainly there's still like a huge,

0:26:49.520 --> 0:26:51.840
<v Speaker 5>huge concentration in kind of you know, the Bay area

0:26:51.880 --> 0:26:54.600
<v Speaker 5>and then kind of New York Boston area. But there

0:26:54.640 --> 0:26:57.879
<v Speaker 5>are cities. Miami is a good example for our healthcare business.

0:26:57.960 --> 0:27:00.760
<v Speaker 5>Nashville is you know, has exploed did over the past

0:27:00.800 --> 0:27:03.879
<v Speaker 5>several years. So again depending on the industry, it depends

0:27:03.920 --> 0:27:05.800
<v Speaker 5>on sort of where our concentration of bankers are. But

0:27:05.960 --> 0:27:07.639
<v Speaker 5>you know, back to that's why we are in one

0:27:07.680 --> 0:27:09.320
<v Speaker 5>hundred and twenty five cities across the country.

0:27:09.880 --> 0:27:12.360
<v Speaker 2>So let's talk international. You spent was it a year

0:27:12.400 --> 0:27:12.840
<v Speaker 2>in London?

0:27:12.960 --> 0:27:13.600
<v Speaker 4>Three years?

0:27:13.760 --> 0:27:14.240
<v Speaker 3>Three years?

0:27:14.280 --> 0:27:17.000
<v Speaker 2>Yes, So you're an old hand there you go dealing

0:27:17.040 --> 0:27:19.440
<v Speaker 2>with Europe. So let's talk a little bit about what's

0:27:19.440 --> 0:27:21.880
<v Speaker 2>happening in the UK and what's going on in Europe.

0:27:22.440 --> 0:27:25.640
<v Speaker 2>How do you look at those markets? Can you play

0:27:25.640 --> 0:27:27.600
<v Speaker 2>in those spaces? Tell us a little bit about what

0:27:27.640 --> 0:27:28.440
<v Speaker 2>the work is like there.

0:27:28.480 --> 0:27:32.440
<v Speaker 5>Sure, So I would say from a commercial banking perspective,

0:27:32.560 --> 0:27:35.840
<v Speaker 5>we definitely support companies globally, and I do think that's

0:27:35.880 --> 0:27:39.920
<v Speaker 5>again one of JP Morgan's competitive advantages. As earlier stage

0:27:39.960 --> 0:27:42.640
<v Speaker 5>companies are looking to expand internationally, we can support them

0:27:42.720 --> 0:27:46.320
<v Speaker 5>across you know, basically any market they're gonna they're going

0:27:46.359 --> 0:27:50.720
<v Speaker 5>to across, you know, both Amya and a PAC. So yes,

0:27:50.800 --> 0:27:52.720
<v Speaker 5>we support companies there. And then we have teams on

0:27:52.760 --> 0:27:55.000
<v Speaker 5>the ground in Europe and Asia, et cetera that are

0:27:55.040 --> 0:27:58.920
<v Speaker 5>supporting early stage companies that are headquarters in Europe in

0:27:59.320 --> 0:28:02.159
<v Speaker 5>a PAC and their expansion into the US. So kind

0:28:02.200 --> 0:28:05.280
<v Speaker 5>of doing it both ways, inbound and outbound. And again

0:28:05.320 --> 0:28:08.040
<v Speaker 5>I think that that's something that with our long history

0:28:08.040 --> 0:28:11.960
<v Speaker 5>of operating in these various jurisdictions, helping to advise companies

0:28:12.000 --> 0:28:13.880
<v Speaker 5>on sort of the right strategy as they think about

0:28:13.880 --> 0:28:15.119
<v Speaker 5>those international expansions.

0:28:15.200 --> 0:28:19.719
<v Speaker 2>Huh really really interesting. What percentage of your business is international?

0:28:19.800 --> 0:28:23.760
<v Speaker 2>I can't imagine JP Mugan feels like it's so dominant

0:28:23.760 --> 0:28:27.439
<v Speaker 2>in the US. What's the perception like overseas?

0:28:27.440 --> 0:28:27.919
<v Speaker 3>How is it?

0:28:28.000 --> 0:28:31.760
<v Speaker 5>So, I would say for our commercial banking business. So

0:28:31.840 --> 0:28:34.679
<v Speaker 5>let me separate this out of a moment. So again,

0:28:34.960 --> 0:28:38.160
<v Speaker 5>the commercial banking business the US is serving US headquarter companies,

0:28:38.160 --> 0:28:41.080
<v Speaker 5>but when they have a European sub or an Asian sub,

0:28:41.200 --> 0:28:44.240
<v Speaker 5>that clearly is a smaller percentage of the company's overall revenue.

0:28:44.280 --> 0:28:46.640
<v Speaker 5>So a smaller percentage of like the revenue that we

0:28:46.680 --> 0:28:49.960
<v Speaker 5>would earn as well, but we're supporting them globally. The

0:28:50.040 --> 0:28:54.120
<v Speaker 5>commercial banking sort of build out in Europe and in

0:28:54.400 --> 0:28:58.920
<v Speaker 5>Asia for bankers on the ground supporting European and Asian

0:28:58.960 --> 0:29:03.280
<v Speaker 5>headquarter companies is a newer effort, newer over the past

0:29:03.520 --> 0:29:07.840
<v Speaker 5>seven or eight years. So it's not as robust in

0:29:07.920 --> 0:29:10.400
<v Speaker 5>terms of our robust is the wrong word. It's not

0:29:10.760 --> 0:29:13.000
<v Speaker 5>as far along right as I mean.

0:29:13.000 --> 0:29:17.440
<v Speaker 2>It is clearly, clearly well established here for hundreds of years.

0:29:17.280 --> 0:29:20.000
<v Speaker 5>Hundreds of years, and we've been in Europe and Asia

0:29:20.080 --> 0:29:23.680
<v Speaker 5>for hundreds of years. Investment banking hundreds of years is

0:29:23.720 --> 0:29:26.040
<v Speaker 5>maybe a strong word, but for many, many, many decades

0:29:26.080 --> 0:29:28.160
<v Speaker 5>from an investment banking perspective. But the build out of

0:29:28.200 --> 0:29:31.240
<v Speaker 5>the commercial bank supporting smaller sized companies in those markets

0:29:31.280 --> 0:29:33.600
<v Speaker 5>is newer seven, seven or eight years ago, and.

0:29:33.840 --> 0:29:35.920
<v Speaker 2>That's a white space that's got to be wide open.

0:29:35.680 --> 0:29:39.520
<v Speaker 5>Now, absolutely absolutely, and again we're finding great traction because

0:29:39.560 --> 0:29:43.040
<v Speaker 5>there is so much obviously, as we all are well aware,

0:29:43.680 --> 0:29:46.680
<v Speaker 5>economies and companies operate in such a global fashion today

0:29:46.720 --> 0:29:49.520
<v Speaker 5>that a company sitting in Europe obviously has generally speaking

0:29:49.560 --> 0:29:51.440
<v Speaker 5>plans to expand in other parts of the globe, the

0:29:51.520 --> 0:29:54.840
<v Speaker 5>US being a huge market, particularly across tech and consumer

0:29:54.880 --> 0:29:57.920
<v Speaker 5>facing businesses, et cetera, So that connectivity is important.

0:29:58.040 --> 0:30:01.680
<v Speaker 2>And you said earlier from checking to IPO, how do

0:30:01.720 --> 0:30:05.000
<v Speaker 2>you think about the IPO market which has been so

0:30:06.280 --> 0:30:09.200
<v Speaker 2>quiet the past few years. We really haven't seen a

0:30:09.240 --> 0:30:13.120
<v Speaker 2>lot of companies coming public. How do you view this,

0:30:14.040 --> 0:30:17.200
<v Speaker 2>When might that change and how does this impact your business?

0:30:17.320 --> 0:30:21.760
<v Speaker 5>Sure, so, we are definitely optimistic on the IPO market

0:30:21.760 --> 0:30:23.560
<v Speaker 5>this year, and I think even you know, in twenty

0:30:23.600 --> 0:30:27.640
<v Speaker 5>twenty four saw a significant uptick in issuance versus twenty

0:30:27.640 --> 0:30:29.440
<v Speaker 5>twenty three. Obviously we were coming off a low base,

0:30:29.480 --> 0:30:31.600
<v Speaker 5>but we saw about thirty three billion in IPO volume

0:30:31.680 --> 0:30:35.640
<v Speaker 5>in twenty twenty four. We think that that could double

0:30:35.800 --> 0:30:40.440
<v Speaker 5>this year, you know, just given I think a stable backdrop,

0:30:40.560 --> 0:30:43.480
<v Speaker 5>more kind of confidence all around the markets. We've also

0:30:43.520 --> 0:30:47.880
<v Speaker 5>just seen a more stable you know, US economy obviously

0:30:48.000 --> 0:30:49.920
<v Speaker 5>so far, you know, knock on wood, feels like we

0:30:50.400 --> 0:30:52.040
<v Speaker 5>sort of took a soft landing right.

0:30:51.920 --> 0:30:52.560
<v Speaker 4>In the US.

0:30:52.920 --> 0:30:55.840
<v Speaker 5>We now have rates on the decline, which is supportive

0:30:55.880 --> 0:30:57.560
<v Speaker 5>of the IPO market. We'll sort of see if that,

0:30:57.720 --> 0:30:59.640
<v Speaker 5>you know, how that kind of plays out of the course,

0:30:59.640 --> 0:31:01.640
<v Speaker 5>of the year, and then I think, you know, the

0:31:01.680 --> 0:31:04.719
<v Speaker 5>expectation of sort of double digit earnings growth in the

0:31:04.720 --> 0:31:07.160
<v Speaker 5>coming year is also very supportive of the equity market.

0:31:07.280 --> 0:31:09.040
<v Speaker 5>So we do think you're going to see a lot

0:31:09.080 --> 0:31:12.720
<v Speaker 5>more activity in the IPO market this year. And obviously

0:31:12.760 --> 0:31:14.880
<v Speaker 5>there's just a ton of supply that's built up over

0:31:14.880 --> 0:31:17.280
<v Speaker 5>the past couple of years of as companies have stayed

0:31:17.320 --> 0:31:19.800
<v Speaker 5>private longer and waiting for a better window to access

0:31:19.800 --> 0:31:20.680
<v Speaker 5>that IPO market.

0:31:20.840 --> 0:31:24.440
<v Speaker 2>So we're recording this at the end of January. I

0:31:24.480 --> 0:31:29.360
<v Speaker 2>don't recall seeing anybody's forecast for the year ahead saying, hey, really,

0:31:29.440 --> 0:31:33.800
<v Speaker 2>an expensive AI from China Deep Seek is going to

0:31:33.840 --> 0:31:38.600
<v Speaker 2>completely disrupt everything. How do you look at the not

0:31:38.760 --> 0:31:43.440
<v Speaker 2>just the technological disruption that we're all experiencing, but the

0:31:43.520 --> 0:31:46.640
<v Speaker 2>incredible pace as to how rapid everything is advancing.

0:31:47.160 --> 0:31:48.680
<v Speaker 3>How do you think about this and how does that

0:31:48.760 --> 0:31:50.320
<v Speaker 3>impact the day job?

0:31:50.320 --> 0:31:51.440
<v Speaker 2>How does it impact the work?

0:31:51.560 --> 0:31:56.600
<v Speaker 5>Sure, so clearly, you know, just talking about Deep Seek specifically,

0:31:56.760 --> 0:32:00.360
<v Speaker 5>obviously just a huge impact on the equity markets.

0:32:00.720 --> 0:32:01.800
<v Speaker 4>You know, as you.

0:32:01.760 --> 0:32:05.600
<v Speaker 5>Saw a lot of a lot of some of the

0:32:05.720 --> 0:32:09.000
<v Speaker 5>larger names trading down significantly, we did see a rebound

0:32:09.040 --> 0:32:11.560
<v Speaker 5>sort of the following day, which was which was beneficial.

0:32:12.280 --> 0:32:14.360
<v Speaker 5>I do think, you know, AI is obviously going to

0:32:14.360 --> 0:32:16.280
<v Speaker 5>be continued to be a big story over the course

0:32:16.280 --> 0:32:19.680
<v Speaker 5>of twenty twenty five. There's also just a tremendous amount

0:32:19.680 --> 0:32:21.320
<v Speaker 5>of capital that needs to be raised to kind of

0:32:21.360 --> 0:32:25.000
<v Speaker 5>support that industry overall. And so I do think, like

0:32:25.040 --> 0:32:27.280
<v Speaker 5>back to sort of the comments about sort of stable

0:32:27.440 --> 0:32:31.440
<v Speaker 5>macroeconomic backdrop rates declining, all of that will be supportive

0:32:31.640 --> 0:32:35.240
<v Speaker 5>of the broader IPO market and the ability to access

0:32:35.240 --> 0:32:37.040
<v Speaker 5>those markets. Yes, we're going to kind of continue to

0:32:37.040 --> 0:32:39.480
<v Speaker 5>see volatility with some of these surprises, like the deep

0:32:39.520 --> 0:32:43.800
<v Speaker 5>Sake example, but it hasn't really changed our view, our

0:32:43.920 --> 0:32:46.480
<v Speaker 5>very constructive view on the market going forward.

0:32:47.240 --> 0:32:50.000
<v Speaker 2>Let's talk a little bit about some of your thoughts

0:32:50.040 --> 0:32:55.000
<v Speaker 2>on leadership at the bank and long term strategy. If

0:32:55.000 --> 0:32:57.520
<v Speaker 2>we go back five or six years, you're a managing

0:32:57.560 --> 0:33:02.800
<v Speaker 2>director and head of specialized industries. What types of firms

0:33:02.800 --> 0:33:05.640
<v Speaker 2>were you working with then and are you still working

0:33:05.680 --> 0:33:09.720
<v Speaker 2>with the same firms or has your portfolio widened since then?

0:33:10.160 --> 0:33:12.240
<v Speaker 5>Well, I would say that portfolio has widened in the

0:33:12.280 --> 0:33:16.360
<v Speaker 5>sense that we've continued to add various industries. So specialized

0:33:16.360 --> 0:33:19.240
<v Speaker 5>industries I think I mentioned before it's nineteen different industries.

0:33:19.240 --> 0:33:23.120
<v Speaker 5>There was some example, Yeah, so that spans a very

0:33:23.160 --> 0:33:26.160
<v Speaker 5>wide remit. So some of our very mature businesses, for instance,

0:33:26.200 --> 0:33:29.040
<v Speaker 5>our government business supporting states and municipalities and school districts

0:33:29.080 --> 0:33:31.400
<v Speaker 5>across the country. We've been doing excuse me doing that

0:33:31.440 --> 0:33:34.400
<v Speaker 5>since you know Japan worn sort of was founded. So

0:33:34.440 --> 0:33:36.840
<v Speaker 5>the government business are not for profit healthcare, hire ed

0:33:36.840 --> 0:33:40.560
<v Speaker 5>and nonprofit business. Again to very mature businesses. We also

0:33:40.640 --> 0:33:42.840
<v Speaker 5>have you know, beverage food and nag our M and

0:33:42.840 --> 0:33:46.960
<v Speaker 5>C business supporting some of the subsidiaries. Media, communications and

0:33:47.360 --> 0:33:50.680
<v Speaker 5>digital infrastructure very hot sector right now in terms of

0:33:50.720 --> 0:33:53.480
<v Speaker 5>the huge need for data centers and capital for data

0:33:53.520 --> 0:33:56.400
<v Speaker 5>centers overall, the innovation economy business again as I mentioned,

0:33:56.440 --> 0:33:58.120
<v Speaker 5>sort of part of all that. So those are some

0:33:58.280 --> 0:34:01.360
<v Speaker 5>examples of the industries that that fall within that that remit.

0:34:01.680 --> 0:34:06.160
<v Speaker 5>So again, when we first started specialized industries, I'm not

0:34:06.200 --> 0:34:08.239
<v Speaker 5>going to remember the exact number, but we probably had

0:34:08.239 --> 0:34:11.440
<v Speaker 5>five industries within that, right, and so we've just continued

0:34:11.440 --> 0:34:14.799
<v Speaker 5>to build out that dedicated expertise over the course of

0:34:14.800 --> 0:34:17.319
<v Speaker 5>the past several years, which we've just found great success in.

0:34:17.760 --> 0:34:21.200
<v Speaker 2>So how do you assess risk when you're rolling into

0:34:21.280 --> 0:34:25.719
<v Speaker 2>a new sector or specialized industry. When you're working in

0:34:25.719 --> 0:34:27.719
<v Speaker 2>a space for a while, you kind of learn what

0:34:28.239 --> 0:34:31.200
<v Speaker 2>the you know, where the minds are laid. When you

0:34:31.280 --> 0:34:34.160
<v Speaker 2>move into a new space, how do you approach that?

0:34:34.840 --> 0:34:37.719
<v Speaker 5>Well, I would just say it's not as if we

0:34:37.719 --> 0:34:41.080
<v Speaker 5>weren't banking companies in each of those industries before. It's

0:34:41.080 --> 0:34:44.880
<v Speaker 5>simply that we did not have dedicated bankers that only did.

0:34:44.640 --> 0:34:47.120
<v Speaker 4>That, right, So back to this is why we very.

0:34:47.040 --> 0:34:49.239
<v Speaker 5>Much believe and it's been proven out in terms of

0:34:49.320 --> 0:34:51.360
<v Speaker 5>the growth that we've seen in sort of the specialized

0:34:51.400 --> 0:34:54.680
<v Speaker 5>industries business. So we sort of focus in on the

0:34:54.719 --> 0:34:57.080
<v Speaker 5>sectors where we think it makes a difference for the

0:34:57.120 --> 0:35:00.239
<v Speaker 5>banker to have that industry expertise. Keep in mind, we

0:35:00.280 --> 0:35:02.759
<v Speaker 5>partner with the investment bank on the m and A

0:35:02.760 --> 0:35:06.000
<v Speaker 5>advisory and strategic capital raising and they are all industry focused, right,

0:35:06.120 --> 0:35:09.560
<v Speaker 5>But does the commercial banker need that industry expertise? Is

0:35:09.560 --> 0:35:12.759
<v Speaker 5>there something very different about the credit risk associated with

0:35:12.800 --> 0:35:15.799
<v Speaker 5>those industries that that banker expertise helps and that we

0:35:15.840 --> 0:35:17.400
<v Speaker 5>need sort of dedicated credit teams.

0:35:17.719 --> 0:35:20.320
<v Speaker 4>Again, with the focus on those specific.

0:35:19.880 --> 0:35:23.320
<v Speaker 5>Industries, is there something different about the product and solution

0:35:23.520 --> 0:35:26.719
<v Speaker 5>set for those companies that would require us to have

0:35:26.760 --> 0:35:30.160
<v Speaker 5>that dedicated focus back to kind of the innovation economy business.

0:35:30.160 --> 0:35:33.000
<v Speaker 5>As I was saying earlier, we didn't have the early

0:35:33.040 --> 0:35:36.560
<v Speaker 5>stage capabilities that we needed, you know, seven eight years ago,

0:35:36.600 --> 0:35:38.920
<v Speaker 5>and that's what it was a very kind of bespoke

0:35:39.040 --> 0:35:41.440
<v Speaker 5>to those high growth companies and the challenges.

0:35:41.040 --> 0:35:44.600
<v Speaker 4>That we fade that they face that led us to.

0:35:44.640 --> 0:35:47.400
<v Speaker 5>Kind of build out those digital capabilities and bundled solutions.

0:35:47.480 --> 0:35:49.120
<v Speaker 5>So that's a good example of why we felt like

0:35:49.160 --> 0:35:50.680
<v Speaker 5>we needed to build that as an industry.

0:35:50.880 --> 0:35:54.839
<v Speaker 2>So it's kind of fascinating that you're serving clients who

0:35:54.960 --> 0:36:00.520
<v Speaker 2>are rapidly innovating, expanding into spaces that wholly on we're seeing.

0:36:01.400 --> 0:36:03.279
<v Speaker 2>How do you keep up with that, how do you

0:36:03.360 --> 0:36:06.680
<v Speaker 2>make sure that you're innovative and cutting edge, and how

0:36:06.680 --> 0:36:10.000
<v Speaker 2>do you build this when it it's almost as if

0:36:10.040 --> 0:36:13.400
<v Speaker 2>your clients are outpacing you know, the rest of the market.

0:36:13.520 --> 0:36:15.719
<v Speaker 5>Absolutely, and I would say that is one of the

0:36:15.760 --> 0:36:19.319
<v Speaker 5>best parts of my job is meeting with founders all

0:36:19.400 --> 0:36:23.880
<v Speaker 5>day long and really obviously hearing about their businesses and

0:36:24.360 --> 0:36:27.040
<v Speaker 5>what they are doing to kind of disrupt industries, new

0:36:27.080 --> 0:36:32.440
<v Speaker 5>technologies and that is extraordinarily rewarding in terms of hearing

0:36:32.480 --> 0:36:35.600
<v Speaker 5>about that and how we can help support that growth. Overall,

0:36:35.960 --> 0:36:39.120
<v Speaker 5>it is very different meeting with again kind of back

0:36:39.120 --> 0:36:44.000
<v Speaker 5>to my earlier background spending time in deck capital markets.

0:36:44.040 --> 0:36:47.200
<v Speaker 5>You're basically covering Fortune five hundred companies. It's very which

0:36:47.239 --> 0:36:50.480
<v Speaker 5>is its own unique circumstances and those companies have their

0:36:50.480 --> 0:36:53.080
<v Speaker 5>own challenges. But it's very different speaking to the treasure

0:36:53.160 --> 0:36:57.080
<v Speaker 5>CFO or CEO of Fortune five hundred company than a founder, right, Like,

0:36:57.160 --> 0:36:58.839
<v Speaker 5>there's just it's a very different.

0:36:59.239 --> 0:37:00.560
<v Speaker 3>Different focus, different.

0:37:01.200 --> 0:37:02.680
<v Speaker 4>Space exactly, and skill set.

0:37:03.040 --> 0:37:06.120
<v Speaker 5>So that again is sort of the most fun part

0:37:06.120 --> 0:37:07.719
<v Speaker 5>of my job is being able to interact with all

0:37:07.719 --> 0:37:10.080
<v Speaker 5>of those founders and hear about sort of the technology

0:37:10.120 --> 0:37:10.439
<v Speaker 5>to come.

0:37:10.880 --> 0:37:13.799
<v Speaker 2>So I'm intrigued at about the work you did in

0:37:13.920 --> 0:37:17.719
<v Speaker 2>debt capital markets, especially when you were in Europe for

0:37:17.760 --> 0:37:21.640
<v Speaker 2>three years. What are the major differences between the way

0:37:21.680 --> 0:37:24.160
<v Speaker 2>we manage debt capital markets and the way they do?

0:37:24.840 --> 0:37:25.879
<v Speaker 3>Is it structural?

0:37:26.000 --> 0:37:30.160
<v Speaker 2>Tell us about you know, why is it that? Are

0:37:30.160 --> 0:37:31.960
<v Speaker 2>they very similar or are they different?

0:37:32.680 --> 0:37:34.200
<v Speaker 5>Well, so a couple things, I would say that, just

0:37:34.200 --> 0:37:38.000
<v Speaker 5>one in terms of how we think about covering companies

0:37:38.000 --> 0:37:41.359
<v Speaker 5>in deck hon arcerts. In the US, we're organized by

0:37:41.360 --> 0:37:45.640
<v Speaker 5>industry team. In Europe for obviously obviously reasons were organized

0:37:45.640 --> 0:37:48.840
<v Speaker 5>by country team given language differences. So that again was

0:37:48.880 --> 0:37:51.279
<v Speaker 5>something that I very much enjoyed, was sitting back to

0:37:51.360 --> 0:37:53.439
<v Speaker 5>in DCM. You're in the trading floor environment. I would

0:37:53.440 --> 0:37:55.560
<v Speaker 5>have my UK team over here, my Germany team, my

0:37:55.600 --> 0:37:58.080
<v Speaker 5>Italy team, so you know, everyone speaking different languages. I

0:37:58.160 --> 0:38:00.480
<v Speaker 5>kept thinking I was going to learn five languages by osmosis.

0:38:00.560 --> 0:38:02.240
<v Speaker 5>That did not work, so unfortunately.

0:38:01.800 --> 0:38:02.439
<v Speaker 4>That's not the case.

0:38:03.160 --> 0:38:05.960
<v Speaker 5>But that was that was a great experience overall. I

0:38:06.080 --> 0:38:10.080
<v Speaker 5>was you know, the European debt capital markets are tend

0:38:10.080 --> 0:38:13.080
<v Speaker 5>to be a little bit more volatile than the US.

0:38:13.160 --> 0:38:15.880
<v Speaker 5>It's also because they are a lot smaller, right in

0:38:15.960 --> 0:38:18.400
<v Speaker 5>terms of just the total volume the investor base that

0:38:18.440 --> 0:38:22.719
<v Speaker 5>sort of supports those markets all around, and so that's

0:38:22.760 --> 0:38:24.680
<v Speaker 5>one of the major differences. What I would say is

0:38:24.719 --> 0:38:30.480
<v Speaker 5>for larger global companies, having access to that European market

0:38:30.840 --> 0:38:34.400
<v Speaker 5>has been quite advantageous, both from a capacity perspective if

0:38:34.400 --> 0:38:36.680
<v Speaker 5>they were running up against capacity constraints for a very

0:38:36.680 --> 0:38:39.600
<v Speaker 5>frequent issue obviously in the US, and two just from

0:38:39.600 --> 0:38:42.480
<v Speaker 5>a cost of funding perspective. So over the last several years,

0:38:42.520 --> 0:38:45.359
<v Speaker 5>given to the divergence and interest rates between the US

0:38:45.400 --> 0:38:48.719
<v Speaker 5>and Europe, for many companies, it's actually been cheaper to

0:38:48.800 --> 0:38:52.600
<v Speaker 5>issue bonds or you know, access to debt markets in

0:38:52.680 --> 0:38:55.359
<v Speaker 5>Europe than it has been in the US. Right in US,

0:38:55.440 --> 0:38:58.400
<v Speaker 5>interest rates were higher. So that's obviously just a great

0:39:00.160 --> 0:39:03.960
<v Speaker 5>alternative right for companies when they need to access enormous

0:39:04.000 --> 0:39:06.319
<v Speaker 5>amounts of capital and or are obviously very focused on

0:39:06.360 --> 0:39:08.360
<v Speaker 5>sort of what the most advantageous cost is.

0:39:08.520 --> 0:39:10.840
<v Speaker 2>So I know you're not an economist, so I'm not

0:39:10.880 --> 0:39:15.320
<v Speaker 2>going to ask you that question, but it just feels

0:39:15.360 --> 0:39:17.600
<v Speaker 2>like Europe cannot get out of its own way for

0:39:17.760 --> 0:39:20.200
<v Speaker 2>I don't know, past five years, ten years, go back

0:39:20.239 --> 0:39:25.360
<v Speaker 2>to Brexit and nearly Grexit. What's going on that Europe

0:39:25.520 --> 0:39:29.720
<v Speaker 2>seems to be almost structurally lagging the US and having

0:39:29.800 --> 0:39:31.880
<v Speaker 2>such difficulty finding its footing.

0:39:32.920 --> 0:39:35.719
<v Speaker 5>Well, I'm also not an expert on politics, so I'm

0:39:35.760 --> 0:39:37.839
<v Speaker 5>not going to comment on that because I think there's

0:39:37.880 --> 0:39:40.520
<v Speaker 5>something to be said there. But what I would say

0:39:40.520 --> 0:39:43.120
<v Speaker 5>from sort of a structural perspective is I think probably

0:39:43.400 --> 0:39:48.080
<v Speaker 5>one of the bigger differences today is demographics, where kind

0:39:48.120 --> 0:39:50.839
<v Speaker 5>of working age population in Europe is declining. I think

0:39:50.840 --> 0:39:53.520
<v Speaker 5>it's still growing modestly in the US, and obviously that

0:39:53.560 --> 0:39:54.960
<v Speaker 5>will turn in the US at some point in time,

0:39:55.000 --> 0:39:57.080
<v Speaker 5>but so that that has been sort of one issue

0:39:57.080 --> 0:40:01.760
<v Speaker 5>in Europe. I think the post COVID recovery in Europe

0:40:01.960 --> 0:40:05.160
<v Speaker 5>was a lot more challenging, primarily because of the Russia

0:40:05.280 --> 0:40:08.080
<v Speaker 5>Ukraine War and sort of the energy crisis that they faced,

0:40:08.120 --> 0:40:10.120
<v Speaker 5>given a lot of their energy was coming from for

0:40:10.360 --> 0:40:13.239
<v Speaker 5>energy supply was coming from from Russia. So that had

0:40:13.280 --> 0:40:15.160
<v Speaker 5>a very different impact in Europe than it did in

0:40:15.480 --> 0:40:15.919
<v Speaker 5>the US.

0:40:16.000 --> 0:40:16.480
<v Speaker 4>Overall.

0:40:17.200 --> 0:40:19.960
<v Speaker 5>If you look at Germany, obviously the largest, you know,

0:40:20.000 --> 0:40:24.400
<v Speaker 5>economy in Europe, it's very still sort of heavily manufacturing based.

0:40:24.880 --> 0:40:29.239
<v Speaker 5>Higher interest rates have really had hurt manufacturing, global manufacturing,

0:40:29.280 --> 0:40:30.840
<v Speaker 5>and so that's how a bigger impact I think on

0:40:31.239 --> 0:40:34.960
<v Speaker 5>Germany with those manufacturers operating globally. So those are some

0:40:35.000 --> 0:40:36.319
<v Speaker 5>of the things that I would point to. And you know,

0:40:36.360 --> 0:40:40.560
<v Speaker 5>there's just never been the same labor productivity across Europe

0:40:40.560 --> 0:40:42.720
<v Speaker 5>as there has been in the US, and quite frankly,

0:40:42.840 --> 0:40:46.719
<v Speaker 5>just the support for innovation and right and new technology,

0:40:46.840 --> 0:40:48.520
<v Speaker 5>and I think that's just had a big impact. Back

0:40:48.560 --> 0:40:54.520
<v Speaker 5>to Germany's heavily manufacturing based right, the US probably less so.

0:40:54.320 --> 0:40:56.239
<v Speaker 2>Because when more service oriented, is that the.

0:40:56.160 --> 0:40:57.160
<v Speaker 4>More service oriented?

0:40:57.160 --> 0:40:59.360
<v Speaker 5>And I think again, you don't have the same I

0:40:59.400 --> 0:41:01.839
<v Speaker 5>think a lot a lot of countries in Europe are

0:41:01.840 --> 0:41:07.279
<v Speaker 5>looking to put in place policies to better incentivize some

0:41:07.320 --> 0:41:09.360
<v Speaker 5>of the technological development. But I mean, you don't have

0:41:09.400 --> 0:41:12.560
<v Speaker 5>a Bay Area type right, right. I mean you have

0:41:12.680 --> 0:41:15.920
<v Speaker 5>little pockets of that kind of concept right where you

0:41:15.960 --> 0:41:18.480
<v Speaker 5>have sort of this ecosystem coming together to disrupt and

0:41:18.520 --> 0:41:21.920
<v Speaker 5>innovate and support new technology. But there there's nothing as

0:41:22.160 --> 0:41:24.280
<v Speaker 5>sort of big as the Bay Area in Europe.

0:41:24.760 --> 0:41:28.000
<v Speaker 2>But you do have world class manufacturing throughout Europe. And

0:41:28.280 --> 0:41:32.480
<v Speaker 2>I think absolutely of Mercedes, Porsche, BMW in Germany. You

0:41:32.520 --> 0:41:36.440
<v Speaker 2>think of all the I guess it really doesn't scale

0:41:36.560 --> 0:41:41.080
<v Speaker 2>watchmaking and things like that, but there are some really

0:41:41.200 --> 0:41:46.680
<v Speaker 2>high end companies that are incredibly successful. Are they just

0:41:46.719 --> 0:41:47.480
<v Speaker 2>the exceptions?

0:41:47.560 --> 0:41:49.640
<v Speaker 3>What is it? I'm trying to conceptualize?

0:41:49.640 --> 0:41:52.680
<v Speaker 5>Sure, But I also think it's it's much more fragmented

0:41:52.719 --> 0:41:55.799
<v Speaker 5>obviously than the US market, with each different country with

0:41:55.880 --> 0:41:59.120
<v Speaker 5>its own own rules and regulations and you know, some

0:41:59.120 --> 0:42:01.239
<v Speaker 5>some sort of more national less policies than others. And

0:42:01.280 --> 0:42:03.080
<v Speaker 5>I think that just has an impact on their ability

0:42:03.120 --> 0:42:04.759
<v Speaker 5>to kind of domin and we're talking about Europe is

0:42:04.760 --> 0:42:05.640
<v Speaker 5>if it's one thing.

0:42:05.560 --> 0:42:06.920
<v Speaker 3>But it's not so.

0:42:07.000 --> 0:42:10.560
<v Speaker 2>You're saying, really, it's it is structural, it's not so.

0:42:11.040 --> 0:42:16.520
<v Speaker 2>The combination of these structural challenges relatively high interest rate,

0:42:17.040 --> 0:42:21.440
<v Speaker 2>less productivity gains, and a focus that's less service oriented,

0:42:21.560 --> 0:42:28.640
<v Speaker 2>more manufacturing oriented demographics and demographics. Yeah, so the people

0:42:28.680 --> 0:42:31.719
<v Speaker 2>who have been waiting for hey, you know, Europe is

0:42:31.719 --> 0:42:33.960
<v Speaker 2>going to catch up. It's going to mean revert any second.

0:42:34.440 --> 0:42:38.759
<v Speaker 2>That doesn't seem to be in the imminent cards anytime soon.

0:42:39.480 --> 0:42:41.480
<v Speaker 4>I don't think that's in the twenty twenty five cards.

0:42:41.520 --> 0:42:42.080
<v Speaker 4>Let's put it there.

0:42:42.080 --> 0:42:46.680
<v Speaker 2>Okay, Hey, that's fair. That's a perfectly fair thing. I

0:42:46.800 --> 0:42:49.799
<v Speaker 2>want to talk a little bit about some of the

0:42:49.800 --> 0:42:53.360
<v Speaker 2>work you've done on women in banking.

0:42:53.640 --> 0:42:56.200
<v Speaker 3>You were on the Women on the Move.

0:42:56.160 --> 0:42:59.760
<v Speaker 2>Podcast and one of the things you said that struck

0:42:59.800 --> 0:43:03.920
<v Speaker 2>me was women don't have as robust of a network

0:43:03.960 --> 0:43:04.879
<v Speaker 2>as as men do.

0:43:05.480 --> 0:43:09.080
<v Speaker 5>Explain, so that was that was a little bit of

0:43:09.080 --> 0:43:12.160
<v Speaker 5>a generalization, probably, but I think what I meant by

0:43:12.200 --> 0:43:16.040
<v Speaker 5>that was if women tend to stick to because I

0:43:16.040 --> 0:43:19.239
<v Speaker 5>think often earlier in their career and probably I did

0:43:19.239 --> 0:43:21.600
<v Speaker 5>the same thing early on. That you stick to sort

0:43:21.600 --> 0:43:23.839
<v Speaker 5>of the women's network that you develop, right, and there's

0:43:23.880 --> 0:43:26.080
<v Speaker 5>a lot of sort of women's networking events. I'll speak

0:43:26.120 --> 0:43:29.880
<v Speaker 5>for financial services specifically. If you only stick to that network,

0:43:30.040 --> 0:43:32.800
<v Speaker 5>there's still a lot fewer women and sort of banking

0:43:33.000 --> 0:43:35.839
<v Speaker 5>or pick many industries, right, then there are men, and

0:43:35.880 --> 0:43:39.319
<v Speaker 5>so that limits kind of that network overall. And so

0:43:39.400 --> 0:43:42.800
<v Speaker 5>I think like important that you're spending time with people

0:43:42.880 --> 0:43:47.360
<v Speaker 5>across the organization, picking mentors across the organization, networking across

0:43:47.400 --> 0:43:50.759
<v Speaker 5>the organization to make sure that you're developing the same

0:43:50.840 --> 0:43:53.160
<v Speaker 5>robust network that's sort of some of your male colleagues

0:43:53.480 --> 0:43:54.959
<v Speaker 5>would already be doing.

0:43:55.480 --> 0:44:01.399
<v Speaker 2>So I also read you value and prioritize mentorship. How

0:44:01.400 --> 0:44:05.080
<v Speaker 2>do you approach this at your job? We'll get to

0:44:05.200 --> 0:44:08.680
<v Speaker 2>questions about who your mentors were, But do you have mentees?

0:44:08.800 --> 0:44:09.160
<v Speaker 2>Are you?

0:44:09.360 --> 0:44:11.280
<v Speaker 3>Are you practicing what you preach?

0:44:12.000 --> 0:44:12.320
<v Speaker 4>Yes?

0:44:12.960 --> 0:44:16.720
<v Speaker 5>And I very much take that as a serious responsibility

0:44:16.719 --> 0:44:19.200
<v Speaker 5>and sort of part of my day job. You know,

0:44:19.480 --> 0:44:22.600
<v Speaker 5>we have various I would say, organized programs and then

0:44:22.600 --> 0:44:26.040
<v Speaker 5>there's more informal you know, mentors mentorship programs, and I

0:44:26.040 --> 0:44:29.280
<v Speaker 5>think both are important. But I think over the years,

0:44:29.640 --> 0:44:33.799
<v Speaker 5>you know, making sure that all of the senior individuals

0:44:33.840 --> 0:44:37.280
<v Speaker 5>are sort of participating in those mentorship sponsorship programs, giving

0:44:37.320 --> 0:44:39.880
<v Speaker 5>younger people sort of the opportunity to learn from someone

0:44:39.880 --> 0:44:42.759
<v Speaker 5>else about their career, and again sort of doing the

0:44:42.800 --> 0:44:46.720
<v Speaker 5>informal mentoring. I think back to the JP Morgan culture.

0:44:46.760 --> 0:44:50.160
<v Speaker 5>I think it's just very endemic there. Someone reaches out,

0:44:50.239 --> 0:44:52.800
<v Speaker 5>you know, to have a cup of coffee with you,

0:44:52.600 --> 0:44:54.759
<v Speaker 5>you go do that, right, and it's just sort of

0:44:54.760 --> 0:44:57.319
<v Speaker 5>something that's expected and something that sort of I grew

0:44:57.360 --> 0:45:00.239
<v Speaker 5>up with, if you will, and so certainly something that

0:45:00.280 --> 0:45:01.680
<v Speaker 5>I again take very seriously.

0:45:02.000 --> 0:45:05.000
<v Speaker 2>So when I first started this podcast, I want to say,

0:45:05.040 --> 0:45:09.120
<v Speaker 2>almost eleven years ago, was very hard finding women in

0:45:09.200 --> 0:45:14.440
<v Speaker 2>senior leadership roles and having them come on as guests.

0:45:14.880 --> 0:45:19.920
<v Speaker 2>That has become much easier. I'm curious how you see

0:45:20.320 --> 0:45:25.400
<v Speaker 2>the industry as as once male dominated. It's still mostly

0:45:25.480 --> 0:45:28.720
<v Speaker 2>male dominated, but it feels like it's improving somewhat.

0:45:29.080 --> 0:45:30.640
<v Speaker 3>What are you what's your perspective.

0:45:30.880 --> 0:45:33.040
<v Speaker 5>I do think that a lot of progress has been

0:45:33.080 --> 0:45:36.040
<v Speaker 5>made overall. I think, you know, JP Morian not to

0:45:36.040 --> 0:45:37.880
<v Speaker 5>toot our own horn, but I think is a great

0:45:37.920 --> 0:45:40.160
<v Speaker 5>example for the industry where you look at, you know,

0:45:40.440 --> 0:45:43.560
<v Speaker 5>our operating committee, which are the individuals that report directly

0:45:43.600 --> 0:45:44.080
<v Speaker 5>to Jamie.

0:45:44.200 --> 0:45:46.000
<v Speaker 4>You know it is heavily female.

0:45:45.719 --> 0:45:48.360
<v Speaker 2>Jamie, I'm sorry, I'm not familiar who is that.

0:45:48.400 --> 0:45:51.400
<v Speaker 5>There are many many females on the operating Committee. So

0:45:51.480 --> 0:45:54.040
<v Speaker 5>we've done a great job there and I think that

0:45:54.040 --> 0:45:56.520
<v Speaker 5>that's kind of you know, filtered down throughout the organization.

0:45:56.640 --> 0:45:59.640
<v Speaker 5>So yes, I do think it has improved substantially. I

0:45:59.719 --> 0:46:02.359
<v Speaker 5>do still think there's a lot of challenges, particularly at

0:46:02.360 --> 0:46:05.959
<v Speaker 5>that sort of VP late VP early ED level, early

0:46:05.960 --> 0:46:08.200
<v Speaker 5>executive director level. A lot of times when people are

0:46:08.239 --> 0:46:11.399
<v Speaker 5>having sort of their first their first children and sort

0:46:11.400 --> 0:46:14.840
<v Speaker 5>of making sure that we're providing this a supportive environment

0:46:14.880 --> 0:46:17.200
<v Speaker 5>that they're able to obviously you know, come back to work.

0:46:17.040 --> 0:46:18.040
<v Speaker 4>As they would like to.

0:46:18.800 --> 0:46:21.160
<v Speaker 5>But yes, I think significant progress has been made at

0:46:21.160 --> 0:46:24.040
<v Speaker 5>But I think that is a very intentional effort back

0:46:24.040 --> 0:46:27.000
<v Speaker 5>to kind of understanding why if we are losing female

0:46:27.000 --> 0:46:29.920
<v Speaker 5>employees or diverse employees, why that is in the same

0:46:29.960 --> 0:46:32.359
<v Speaker 5>way that we want to understand why we're losing any employee, right,

0:46:32.480 --> 0:46:34.439
<v Speaker 5>any talented employee we don't we don't want to lose.

0:46:34.960 --> 0:46:36.880
<v Speaker 5>But I think you have to be just very intentional

0:46:36.960 --> 0:46:43.520
<v Speaker 5>about measuring progress and understanding what the challenges are and

0:46:43.600 --> 0:46:46.000
<v Speaker 5>if there's anything that you can do or should be

0:46:46.040 --> 0:46:48.320
<v Speaker 5>doing to have a more sort of accommodative environment and

0:46:48.360 --> 0:46:49.240
<v Speaker 5>inclusive environment.

0:46:49.560 --> 0:46:52.000
<v Speaker 2>So I have a question later about advice to recent

0:46:52.040 --> 0:46:54.640
<v Speaker 2>college grads, but as long as we're talking about women

0:46:54.680 --> 0:46:59.600
<v Speaker 2>in banking, let's stay focused on that here. What advice

0:46:59.640 --> 0:47:03.560
<v Speaker 2>do you have for any young woman who wants to

0:47:03.560 --> 0:47:07.560
<v Speaker 2>become part of the financial sector or banking industry.

0:47:08.560 --> 0:47:14.799
<v Speaker 5>I would just say, really taking advantage of friends colleagues

0:47:14.840 --> 0:47:19.640
<v Speaker 5>that you know, your network peers to understand all aspects

0:47:19.640 --> 0:47:22.640
<v Speaker 5>of the industry. And you know that's hard to do

0:47:22.719 --> 0:47:24.719
<v Speaker 5>sometimes when you're in college and you're not sort of

0:47:24.760 --> 0:47:28.480
<v Speaker 5>sitting in the organization. But I do think, and this

0:47:28.560 --> 0:47:32.120
<v Speaker 5>is not a commentary on females versus males, but just

0:47:32.160 --> 0:47:36.000
<v Speaker 5>sort of back to the networking point, you have kind

0:47:36.000 --> 0:47:38.960
<v Speaker 5>of a natural advantage if your parent was an investment

0:47:38.960 --> 0:47:42.120
<v Speaker 5>banker or a lawyer or right that dealt with with

0:47:42.280 --> 0:47:44.960
<v Speaker 5>sort of the banking industry, or you know, pick another

0:47:45.000 --> 0:47:49.280
<v Speaker 5>sort of adjacent profession, and so you know, those individuals

0:47:50.560 --> 0:47:52.640
<v Speaker 5>know the right questions to ask, are more aware of

0:47:52.640 --> 0:47:54.879
<v Speaker 5>the opportunities across the firm. It's not just investment banking.

0:47:54.920 --> 0:47:56.840
<v Speaker 5>There's lots of other things we do a JP Morgan

0:47:57.040 --> 0:47:59.600
<v Speaker 5>or any firm. So I think just making sure that

0:47:59.640 --> 0:48:02.799
<v Speaker 5>you're figuring out how to kind of gather that information

0:48:03.920 --> 0:48:06.040
<v Speaker 5>and ask all of those questions so that you are

0:48:06.040 --> 0:48:07.960
<v Speaker 5>a little more educated coming in about sort of what

0:48:08.000 --> 0:48:09.280
<v Speaker 5>the opportunities are overall.

0:48:09.520 --> 0:48:13.120
<v Speaker 2>Huh, really interesting. So let me throw you a curveball question.

0:48:13.560 --> 0:48:17.319
<v Speaker 2>We talked earlier, not only about your ballet at age four,

0:48:17.400 --> 0:48:20.759
<v Speaker 2>but dancing professionally for three years. You're a member of

0:48:20.800 --> 0:48:25.120
<v Speaker 2>the board of trustees for American Ballet Theater, that's the

0:48:25.280 --> 0:48:29.799
<v Speaker 2>pinnacle of dance in America. Tell us a little bit

0:48:29.920 --> 0:48:33.239
<v Speaker 2>about the organization, how you found your way to it,

0:48:34.160 --> 0:48:35.279
<v Speaker 2>what are you doing with them?

0:48:35.520 --> 0:48:38.040
<v Speaker 4>Sure? So, I have been on the board since two

0:48:38.080 --> 0:48:38.799
<v Speaker 4>thousand and nine.

0:48:39.760 --> 0:48:41.239
<v Speaker 3>So wow, that's fifteen plus.

0:48:41.280 --> 0:48:42.759
<v Speaker 4>Yes, yes, so a long time. So again.

0:48:42.840 --> 0:48:45.880
<v Speaker 5>American Ballet Theater, one of the greatest ballet companies in

0:48:45.920 --> 0:48:50.200
<v Speaker 5>the world, based here in New York, officially designated by Congress,

0:48:50.239 --> 0:48:51.720
<v Speaker 5>is America's national ballet company.

0:48:51.800 --> 0:48:52.640
<v Speaker 4>Huh.

0:48:52.880 --> 0:48:56.120
<v Speaker 5>And actually, as of January of this year, I am

0:48:56.160 --> 0:48:57.759
<v Speaker 5>the new chair of the Board of ABT.

0:48:57.600 --> 0:48:58.719
<v Speaker 2>Which is super exciting.

0:48:59.520 --> 0:49:00.279
<v Speaker 4>But you know, the.

0:49:00.200 --> 0:49:03.799
<v Speaker 5>Board obviously has its basic sort of governmance functions, but

0:49:03.880 --> 0:49:06.799
<v Speaker 5>you know, we spend a lot of time helping with

0:49:06.880 --> 0:49:12.240
<v Speaker 5>fundraising for the organization and helping provide you know, expertise

0:49:12.360 --> 0:49:15.840
<v Speaker 5>where each individual has it. Any nonprofit obviously has a

0:49:15.880 --> 0:49:18.399
<v Speaker 5>much more limited sort of staff overall. So if there's

0:49:18.400 --> 0:49:20.200
<v Speaker 5>people on the board that have real estate expertise, or

0:49:20.239 --> 0:49:24.080
<v Speaker 5>finance expertise or HR expertise, that is very valuable to

0:49:24.120 --> 0:49:25.920
<v Speaker 5>the organization as a whole. So there's always sort of

0:49:25.960 --> 0:49:28.600
<v Speaker 5>special projects that we you know, sort of participate in

0:49:28.640 --> 0:49:32.440
<v Speaker 5>from that perspective, but a big chunk of what the

0:49:32.440 --> 0:49:37.480
<v Speaker 5>board does is really making sure people are aware of ABT,

0:49:37.800 --> 0:49:41.640
<v Speaker 5>helping with fundraising, helping attract new donors, helping attract and

0:49:41.680 --> 0:49:43.000
<v Speaker 5>develop new audience members.

0:49:43.280 --> 0:49:44.760
<v Speaker 3>Huh really really interesting.

0:49:45.920 --> 0:49:50.640
<v Speaker 2>Have passed board members and or chair people been former

0:49:51.520 --> 0:49:55.640
<v Speaker 2>professional ballet dancers or is this unusual?

0:49:55.840 --> 0:49:59.480
<v Speaker 5>There's always a few, but certainly the majority of people

0:49:59.520 --> 0:50:01.880
<v Speaker 5>on the board don't have a background in dance. And

0:50:02.320 --> 0:50:05.240
<v Speaker 5>as I always remind everybody, I call it the separation

0:50:05.320 --> 0:50:07.600
<v Speaker 5>between church and state. The board is there to sort

0:50:07.640 --> 0:50:10.040
<v Speaker 5>of help with the business of running the ballet company.

0:50:10.080 --> 0:50:12.680
<v Speaker 5>They have no input whatsoever to anything artistic, which is

0:50:12.680 --> 0:50:14.760
<v Speaker 5>why it's not required that you have any sort of background.

0:50:15.000 --> 0:50:17.320
<v Speaker 2>But I'm curious if there have been previous chair people

0:50:17.440 --> 0:50:19.799
<v Speaker 2>who were professional ballet.

0:50:19.520 --> 0:50:21.520
<v Speaker 4>Dancers that I would have.

0:50:21.960 --> 0:50:23.919
<v Speaker 5>I don't think so, But I'm not one hundred percent

0:50:23.920 --> 0:50:26.960
<v Speaker 5>part right, I don't think so. Our previous chair who

0:50:27.040 --> 0:50:30.480
<v Speaker 5>retired at the end of last year, his sister danced

0:50:30.480 --> 0:50:32.480
<v Speaker 5>with a company for many years, and that's really how

0:50:32.520 --> 0:50:35.520
<v Speaker 5>he became involved in Obviously, you know, very passionate about

0:50:35.560 --> 0:50:36.200
<v Speaker 5>the ballet huh.

0:50:36.239 --> 0:50:39.200
<v Speaker 2>Really, it's one of those fascinating things that just I

0:50:39.200 --> 0:50:41.960
<v Speaker 2>don't see on people's resumes all that often. And I

0:50:42.000 --> 0:50:44.759
<v Speaker 2>had no idea you was shamman, but it's really fascinating,

0:50:44.920 --> 0:50:47.160
<v Speaker 2>all right. So while I still have you, let's jump

0:50:47.200 --> 0:50:50.480
<v Speaker 2>to our favorite questions that we ask all of our guests.

0:50:51.200 --> 0:50:55.280
<v Speaker 2>Speaking of entertainment, Let's start with what are you streaming

0:50:55.320 --> 0:50:59.280
<v Speaker 2>these days? What's keeping you entertained? It could be Netflix, podcast, whatever,

0:50:59.360 --> 0:51:01.520
<v Speaker 2>What what are you enjoying these days?

0:51:01.960 --> 0:51:04.520
<v Speaker 5>So first I would say I am sort of an

0:51:04.600 --> 0:51:07.719
<v Speaker 5>avid reader. I was talking with a colleague on my

0:51:07.760 --> 0:51:10.920
<v Speaker 5>way over here. Everybody consumes information differently. I consume it

0:51:11.000 --> 0:51:14.719
<v Speaker 5>better reading, I think, than always listening right the same way.

0:51:14.800 --> 0:51:17.600
<v Speaker 5>So I'm sort of very religious about getting through The

0:51:17.640 --> 0:51:19.880
<v Speaker 5>Economist and The New Yorker every week. And I won't

0:51:19.920 --> 0:51:22.200
<v Speaker 5>let myself read the next issue of The Economist until

0:51:22.200 --> 0:51:23.080
<v Speaker 5>I finish the first one.

0:51:23.120 --> 0:51:25.799
<v Speaker 4>So even if i'm behind, I know that.

0:51:26.360 --> 0:51:28.680
<v Speaker 2>I'm in nineteen eighty six if I follow.

0:51:28.400 --> 0:51:30.640
<v Speaker 4>The Okay, there you go, I might have to get

0:51:30.640 --> 0:51:31.359
<v Speaker 4>that up at some point.

0:51:32.400 --> 0:51:35.480
<v Speaker 5>I am currently streaming, I guess, the second season of

0:51:35.520 --> 0:51:37.200
<v Speaker 5>The Diplomat, which I'm very much enjoying.

0:51:37.239 --> 0:51:37.879
<v Speaker 3>I so good.

0:51:38.200 --> 0:51:41.040
<v Speaker 5>I love the political action thrillers, but I think I'm

0:51:41.080 --> 0:51:42.759
<v Speaker 5>running out of them because I've watched all of them

0:51:42.760 --> 0:51:43.200
<v Speaker 5>at this point.

0:51:43.239 --> 0:51:45.520
<v Speaker 4>So you s oh, no, I haven't seen that.

0:51:45.840 --> 0:51:51.640
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so a little more intelligence community slash tip of

0:51:51.640 --> 0:51:55.200
<v Speaker 2>the spear, okay, but you know, the same sort of

0:51:56.920 --> 0:52:00.399
<v Speaker 2>back and forth layers of intrigue. And but I really

0:52:00.480 --> 0:52:03.920
<v Speaker 2>enjoyed The Diplomat. I thought that was fascinating. And then

0:52:04.120 --> 0:52:05.520
<v Speaker 2>what was its secretary of state?

0:52:05.680 --> 0:52:07.800
<v Speaker 4>Was the madam secretary Secretary?

0:52:07.880 --> 0:52:09.160
<v Speaker 3>That same concept.

0:52:09.239 --> 0:52:11.560
<v Speaker 5>I will admit I've watched it a couple of times.

0:52:11.560 --> 0:52:14.919
<v Speaker 5>Oh really, Yes, exactly. I think it's a good pick

0:52:15.000 --> 0:52:20.000
<v Speaker 5>me up, particularly when partisan politics are you know, depressing everyone.

0:52:20.080 --> 0:52:22.600
<v Speaker 4>It's good. It's just a happy there's always a happy ending.

0:52:22.680 --> 0:52:23.319
<v Speaker 4>I appreciate the.

0:52:23.440 --> 0:52:25.560
<v Speaker 2>Time there's you have an ability to go to a

0:52:25.600 --> 0:52:29.960
<v Speaker 2>space you're wholly unfamiliar with and be challenged. It's not

0:52:30.040 --> 0:52:33.840
<v Speaker 2>just entertaining, but it you know, clears the cob webs exactly, exactly,

0:52:34.120 --> 0:52:38.240
<v Speaker 2>really interesting. So we talked about you as a mentor.

0:52:38.560 --> 0:52:41.000
<v Speaker 2>Who were your mentors who helped shape your career?

0:52:42.360 --> 0:52:46.560
<v Speaker 5>So I would say I feel very lucky when I

0:52:46.760 --> 0:52:48.960
<v Speaker 5>was most of my career, when I was in Deck

0:52:48.960 --> 0:52:52.160
<v Speaker 5>Capital Markets, I worked for a woman who ran DCM

0:52:52.200 --> 0:52:53.319
<v Speaker 5>at the time, and then she went on to do

0:52:53.320 --> 0:52:56.359
<v Speaker 5>different things at the firm who was very much a

0:52:56.600 --> 0:52:58.520
<v Speaker 5>sponsor mentor.

0:52:58.200 --> 0:52:59.160
<v Speaker 4>For me overall.

0:53:00.040 --> 0:53:02.239
<v Speaker 5>And it's just, you know, over time she's retired now

0:53:02.239 --> 0:53:04.600
<v Speaker 5>from JPMorgan but sort of you know, become a friend.

0:53:04.640 --> 0:53:09.120
<v Speaker 5>But I think that's where I really, I think learned

0:53:09.160 --> 0:53:13.200
<v Speaker 5>and embraced kind of just this concept of attracting talent,

0:53:13.280 --> 0:53:16.600
<v Speaker 5>retaining talent, helping to kind of bring up the next

0:53:16.640 --> 0:53:21.319
<v Speaker 5>generation of women is a responsibility of senior people. And

0:53:21.360 --> 0:53:25.120
<v Speaker 5>she really demonstrated that, and certainly I took that to heart.

0:53:25.600 --> 0:53:28.440
<v Speaker 2>So since you are a reader, let's talk about books.

0:53:28.480 --> 0:53:30.960
<v Speaker 2>What are your favorites and what are you reading right now?

0:53:32.000 --> 0:53:35.000
<v Speaker 5>So favorites are hard, but what I'm what I'm reading

0:53:35.080 --> 0:53:38.600
<v Speaker 5>right now? So I actually just finished over the holidays.

0:53:39.800 --> 0:53:42.839
<v Speaker 5>I tend to alternate between fiction and nonfiction, okay, because

0:53:42.840 --> 0:53:46.320
<v Speaker 5>I think both are important. Finished Chasing Hope, the Nicholas

0:53:46.360 --> 0:53:48.520
<v Speaker 5>christoph book is a Foreign Correspondent for The Times, which

0:53:48.560 --> 0:53:52.799
<v Speaker 5>is interesting. I finished a biography of Alexeira Monsky, who's

0:53:52.800 --> 0:53:55.960
<v Speaker 5>a choreographer. I don't think many many listening to this

0:53:55.960 --> 0:53:57.560
<v Speaker 5>podcast may find that book interesting.

0:53:57.600 --> 0:54:00.640
<v Speaker 4>But I did a new.

0:54:02.040 --> 0:54:06.279
<v Speaker 5>Fiction by Michael Cunningham called Day. So those are all

0:54:06.760 --> 0:54:10.720
<v Speaker 5>really good. Some of my favorite authors Isabelle Ending Dave Edgars.

0:54:12.840 --> 0:54:13.600
<v Speaker 4>That's what I would say.

0:54:13.840 --> 0:54:15.160
<v Speaker 2>Edgars is kind of funny if I.

0:54:17.239 --> 0:54:19.600
<v Speaker 5>And he has funny titles which I love. Heartbreaking Work

0:54:19.600 --> 0:54:21.520
<v Speaker 5>of Staggering Genius one of his first books.

0:54:21.520 --> 0:54:22.120
<v Speaker 4>Love that book.

0:54:22.200 --> 0:54:26.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so we're down to our last two questions. And

0:54:26.600 --> 0:54:30.160
<v Speaker 2>this is a broader question than I asked earlier. What

0:54:30.280 --> 0:54:32.680
<v Speaker 2>sort of advice would you give to a recent college

0:54:32.719 --> 0:54:37.040
<v Speaker 2>grad interested in a career in either banking or finance.

0:54:39.160 --> 0:54:45.520
<v Speaker 5>I think to make sure that they embrace risks taking.

0:54:46.160 --> 0:54:50.200
<v Speaker 5>And I say that because maybe just because I myself,

0:54:50.560 --> 0:54:53.000
<v Speaker 5>maybe I'm a little bit risk averse. But I think

0:54:54.160 --> 0:54:56.880
<v Speaker 5>over the course of your career, you have the opportunity

0:54:56.960 --> 0:54:59.000
<v Speaker 5>often to do many different things, and a lot of

0:54:59.000 --> 0:55:01.640
<v Speaker 5>times people are afraid to sort of leave their current

0:55:01.640 --> 0:55:03.920
<v Speaker 5>group and do something different, and it just opens up

0:55:03.920 --> 0:55:06.480
<v Speaker 5>a whole world of possibility. So I think sort of

0:55:07.239 --> 0:55:10.080
<v Speaker 5>taking a little bit more risk than you might naturally

0:55:10.160 --> 0:55:11.760
<v Speaker 5>do is always good advice.

0:55:11.960 --> 0:55:14.800
<v Speaker 2>And when you have no spouse, no mortgage, no kids,

0:55:14.960 --> 0:55:17.920
<v Speaker 2>that's the time full on your face because you get up,

0:55:18.000 --> 0:55:21.600
<v Speaker 2>dust yourself off and start over again. It's funny how

0:55:22.080 --> 0:55:27.080
<v Speaker 2>when you're a few years past being young, that's obvious,

0:55:27.080 --> 0:55:28.560
<v Speaker 2>but at the time it doesn't feel that way.

0:55:28.560 --> 0:55:30.600
<v Speaker 4>Well, and it feels like such a big ust.

0:55:30.560 --> 0:55:33.640
<v Speaker 2>Got it's so risky, right exactly. And our final question,

0:55:34.200 --> 0:55:36.279
<v Speaker 2>what do you know about the world of banking and

0:55:36.360 --> 0:55:40.160
<v Speaker 2>investment and growth companies today that would have been really

0:55:40.200 --> 0:55:42.160
<v Speaker 2>helpful twenty five or so years ago.

0:55:43.440 --> 0:55:44.920
<v Speaker 4>That's a really good question.

0:55:45.200 --> 0:55:47.040
<v Speaker 2>And it's not I should have worn in video when

0:55:47.040 --> 0:55:51.719
<v Speaker 2>it was fifty cents. It's like, what philosophically would have

0:55:51.760 --> 0:55:54.839
<v Speaker 2>been useful to know that you eventually figured out.

0:55:55.600 --> 0:55:58.839
<v Speaker 5>I think because I started in the investment bank and

0:55:58.880 --> 0:56:02.880
<v Speaker 5>then by definition was really working with primarily larger size companies.

0:56:03.200 --> 0:56:05.720
<v Speaker 5>I think I know, as I kind of mentioned earlier,

0:56:06.440 --> 0:56:09.400
<v Speaker 5>understanding how different it is and the fact that you

0:56:09.600 --> 0:56:12.480
<v Speaker 5>have the ability to make an even bigger difference for

0:56:12.560 --> 0:56:15.560
<v Speaker 5>a smaller size company that needs that sort of trusted

0:56:15.600 --> 0:56:19.480
<v Speaker 5>advisor even more, I think it would would be sort

0:56:19.480 --> 0:56:22.920
<v Speaker 5>of good to know, right because it is. I think

0:56:22.960 --> 0:56:25.319
<v Speaker 5>financial services overall, you have the ability to take on

0:56:25.360 --> 0:56:28.160
<v Speaker 5>a lot more responsibility at an early age than other industries.

0:56:28.560 --> 0:56:30.880
<v Speaker 5>But I think again, the ability to kind of influence

0:56:30.920 --> 0:56:35.239
<v Speaker 5>and advise an early stage company is just incredibly rewarding

0:56:35.360 --> 0:56:38.160
<v Speaker 5>given the limited resources staff that they have.

0:56:38.880 --> 0:56:42.040
<v Speaker 2>Melissa, this has been absolutely fascinating. Thank you for being

0:56:42.120 --> 0:56:46.279
<v Speaker 2>so generous with your time. We have been speaking with

0:56:46.360 --> 0:56:50.319
<v Speaker 2>Melissa Smith. She is co head of commercial banking for

0:56:50.480 --> 0:56:54.480
<v Speaker 2>JP Morgan. If you enjoy this conversation, we'll be sure

0:56:54.560 --> 0:56:57.440
<v Speaker 2>to check out any of the past five hundred or

0:56:57.480 --> 0:57:01.040
<v Speaker 2>so we've done over the previous ten years. You can

0:57:01.080 --> 0:57:06.040
<v Speaker 2>find those at iTunes, Spotify, Bloomberg YouTube, wherever you find

0:57:06.280 --> 0:57:09.239
<v Speaker 2>your favorite podcasts, and be sure to check out my

0:57:09.400 --> 0:57:14.640
<v Speaker 2>new book, How Not To Invest, coming March seventeenth, wherever

0:57:14.719 --> 0:57:16.600
<v Speaker 2>you get your favorite books from.

0:57:17.080 --> 0:57:18.160
<v Speaker 3>I would be remiss if.

0:57:18.120 --> 0:57:19.960
<v Speaker 2>I did not thank the Crack team that helps put

0:57:20.000 --> 0:57:24.600
<v Speaker 2>these conversations together each week. Sarah Livesey is my audio engineer.

0:57:25.120 --> 0:57:29.120
<v Speaker 2>Anna Luke is my producer. Sean Russo is my researcher.

0:57:29.440 --> 0:57:33.400
<v Speaker 2>Sage Bauman is the head of Podcasts at Bloomberg. I'm

0:57:33.400 --> 0:57:37.600
<v Speaker 2>Barry Rutults. You've been listening to Masters in Business on

0:57:37.720 --> 0:57:41.960
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Radio