1
00:00:02,520 --> 00:00:07,040
Speaker 1: Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio news.

2
00:00:07,960 --> 00:00:11,680
Speaker 2: You're listening to Bloomberg Business Week with Carol Masser and

3
00:00:11,760 --> 00:00:14,160
Speaker 2: Tim Stenoveek on Bloomberg Radio.

4
00:00:14,440 --> 00:00:18,760
Speaker 1: Chairs of Canadian uranium producer Chemico rose as much as

5
00:00:18,800 --> 00:00:21,680
Speaker 1: twenty seven percent to a record high today. This after

6
00:00:21,720 --> 00:00:24,360
Speaker 1: the US government signed a packed with westing House Electric,

7
00:00:24,920 --> 00:00:27,840
Speaker 1: Chemi Coo, and Brookfield that will see at least eighty

8
00:00:27,960 --> 00:00:30,680
Speaker 1: billion dollars of new nuclear reactors constructed in the US

9
00:00:30,720 --> 00:00:34,280
Speaker 1: to accelerate nuclear power in AI deployment and breaking late yesterday,

10
00:00:34,320 --> 00:00:36,720
Speaker 1: next to air Energy planning to restart a nuclear power

11
00:00:36,720 --> 00:00:40,280
Speaker 1: plan in Iowa, primarily to supply Google data centers. We

12
00:00:40,320 --> 00:00:42,520
Speaker 1: got Will Wade with us. He's Bloomberg News Energy reporter.

13
00:00:42,520 --> 00:00:45,000
Speaker 1: He joins us here in the Bloomberg Interactive Brokers Studio.

14
00:00:46,120 --> 00:00:49,120
Speaker 1: Did the US make a mistake, Will in shutting down

15
00:00:49,520 --> 00:00:51,720
Speaker 1: nuclear reactors over the last few years.

16
00:00:52,000 --> 00:00:55,560
Speaker 3: Oh, that's a tough question. When they made those decisions

17
00:00:55,600 --> 00:00:57,960
Speaker 3: to shut down reactors, and I used to keep a

18
00:00:57,960 --> 00:01:00,960
Speaker 3: spreadsheet on my desk, I call it dead Nukes file

19
00:01:01,440 --> 00:01:04,880
Speaker 3: of the dozen or so reactors that were shut down

20
00:01:04,920 --> 00:01:07,760
Speaker 3: in the past a little more in a decade. It

21
00:01:07,800 --> 00:01:10,320
Speaker 3: was the right decision. Then they were expensive to operate.

22
00:01:11,560 --> 00:01:14,520
Speaker 3: Nobody wanted to pay that much for power. But the

23
00:01:14,560 --> 00:01:16,279
Speaker 3: world has really changed around us.

24
00:01:16,280 --> 00:01:19,280
Speaker 1: And I think at Indian Point, close to New York City,

25
00:01:19,280 --> 00:01:23,160
Speaker 1: that one was didn't it outlive It's like life cycle.

26
00:01:23,200 --> 00:01:24,400
Speaker 1: It was sort of at the end of its life.

27
00:01:24,480 --> 00:01:25,920
Speaker 2: Oh no, it was closed ahead of time.

28
00:01:26,120 --> 00:01:27,200
Speaker 1: It was closed ahead of time.

29
00:01:27,280 --> 00:01:29,640
Speaker 3: Yeah, that was a big political campaign. There were people

30
00:01:29,680 --> 00:01:31,959
Speaker 3: that were really worried about having a nuclear power plant

31
00:01:32,080 --> 00:01:34,640
Speaker 3: so close to the biggest city in America. I mean,

32
00:01:34,640 --> 00:01:37,880
Speaker 3: that's a legitimate concern. But we closed that plant and

33
00:01:37,959 --> 00:01:41,640
Speaker 3: immediately people started saying, wait, New York State carbon emissions

34
00:01:41,680 --> 00:01:44,080
Speaker 3: are going to go up this year because we replaced

35
00:01:44,080 --> 00:01:45,559
Speaker 3: all the nuclear with natural gas.

36
00:01:45,959 --> 00:01:46,760
Speaker 2: Who would have thought.

37
00:01:47,520 --> 00:01:49,760
Speaker 4: So it does feel like we mentioned the US signing

38
00:01:49,760 --> 00:01:52,560
Speaker 4: an eighty billion dollar pack to boost nuclear power in

39
00:01:52,640 --> 00:01:56,040
Speaker 4: that AI push, Google buying power from next era nuclear

40
00:01:56,080 --> 00:01:57,880
Speaker 4: power plant being revived.

41
00:01:58,200 --> 00:02:00,360
Speaker 2: So the spend is on, the deal are on?

42
00:02:00,520 --> 00:02:03,440
Speaker 4: Is the build on though, to really build out maybe

43
00:02:03,480 --> 00:02:05,200
Speaker 4: the nuclear capacity that's needed.

44
00:02:06,000 --> 00:02:10,320
Speaker 2: Oh building nuclear, No, nobody's doing that, that's true.

45
00:02:10,680 --> 00:02:14,000
Speaker 1: But the money's there, the commitments are there. The mothballing

46
00:02:14,120 --> 00:02:16,800
Speaker 1: is being undone. Right, Okay, So here's what we're seeing.

47
00:02:17,200 --> 00:02:20,880
Speaker 1: There is an enormous amount of interest in nuclear energy

48
00:02:20,960 --> 00:02:24,120
Speaker 1: right now. I've been seeing it for eighteen twenty four months.

49
00:02:24,160 --> 00:02:27,839
Speaker 1: This is because electricity demand is going to go through

50
00:02:27,880 --> 00:02:31,480
Speaker 1: the roof. That's largely for data centers and AI It's

51
00:02:31,520 --> 00:02:33,200
Speaker 1: not just that, it's for a lot of things, but

52
00:02:33,240 --> 00:02:34,880
Speaker 1: that's the big part of it.

53
00:02:35,240 --> 00:02:37,280
Speaker 3: We need new electricity, we need a lot of it.

54
00:02:37,720 --> 00:02:40,000
Speaker 3: We did not see this coming. We were not building

55
00:02:40,000 --> 00:02:43,680
Speaker 3: new nuclear plants. At the same time, we would love

56
00:02:43,680 --> 00:02:48,320
Speaker 3: our electricity to be clean. So that really makes nuclear

57
00:02:48,360 --> 00:02:50,960
Speaker 3: the best option because it's available around the clock, unlike

58
00:02:50,960 --> 00:02:51,720
Speaker 3: wind and solar.

59
00:02:51,960 --> 00:02:55,040
Speaker 1: Right how quickly can nuclear power plants be built outside

60
00:02:55,080 --> 00:02:57,760
Speaker 1: of the United States? In China, Korea, Japan.

61
00:02:58,720 --> 00:03:00,640
Speaker 2: Oh, China's really good at building them.

62
00:03:00,680 --> 00:03:05,320
Speaker 3: They've they've been doing a NonStop they got I think

63
00:03:05,400 --> 00:03:07,720
Speaker 3: they're soon going to surpass the US in terms of

64
00:03:07,760 --> 00:03:10,000
Speaker 3: the number of reactors they've got going. So yeah, they're

65
00:03:10,320 --> 00:03:13,200
Speaker 3: faster at it than us. The Koreas are really good

66
00:03:13,200 --> 00:03:15,640
Speaker 3: at it. I was in Korea this year. Their nuclear

67
00:03:15,680 --> 00:03:19,560
Speaker 3: industry is they've been going NonStop for fifty something years.

68
00:03:19,680 --> 00:03:24,840
Speaker 3: Our industry pretty much ground to a holt around nineteen seventy.

69
00:03:24,480 --> 00:03:26,120
Speaker 2: Nine with through My Island.

70
00:03:27,040 --> 00:03:31,360
Speaker 3: So we spent years doing nothing and we never really

71
00:03:31,360 --> 00:03:32,120
Speaker 3: recovered from that.

72
00:03:32,240 --> 00:03:33,040
Speaker 2: We're working on it.

73
00:03:33,200 --> 00:03:35,560
Speaker 4: Well, we're going to keep Will Wade with us Blimber

74
00:03:35,600 --> 00:03:38,080
Speaker 4: News Energy Report. Someone else who's working on it too

75
00:03:38,360 --> 00:03:42,000
Speaker 4: to build out nuclear capacity is James Walker. He's CEO

76
00:03:42,000 --> 00:03:44,360
Speaker 4: of Nano Nuclear Energy. It's a two point three billion

77
00:03:44,400 --> 00:03:48,040
Speaker 4: dollar market cap nuclear energy company that is working on

78
00:03:48,160 --> 00:03:52,400
Speaker 4: SMRs small modular reactors. Shares are up nearly ninety percent

79
00:03:52,480 --> 00:03:54,960
Speaker 4: so far this year. Big chunk though, of the float

80
00:03:55,280 --> 00:03:58,920
Speaker 4: is short. James joining us from Vancouver. James, come on

81
00:03:59,000 --> 00:04:04,320
Speaker 4: in on this conversation. I mean, realistically, how long before

82
00:04:04,360 --> 00:04:08,880
Speaker 4: we actually you actually get an SMR built and it's

83
00:04:08,960 --> 00:04:09,560
Speaker 4: up and running.

84
00:04:10,880 --> 00:04:13,120
Speaker 5: It's a good question because it gets asked, as you

85
00:04:13,120 --> 00:04:15,440
Speaker 5: can imagine, more than any other question. And there's kind

86
00:04:15,480 --> 00:04:18,719
Speaker 5: of two answers to it too, because to get a

87
00:04:18,920 --> 00:04:22,320
Speaker 5: reactor built and constructed and licensed is one question, but

88
00:04:22,360 --> 00:04:24,560
Speaker 5: the other question is how long is it going to

89
00:04:24,560 --> 00:04:26,800
Speaker 5: take for the fuel supply chain to be built back

90
00:04:26,839 --> 00:04:29,840
Speaker 5: adequately in the country to be able to mass manufacture

91
00:04:29,839 --> 00:04:32,280
Speaker 5: the fuel, to allow the mass manufactur of reactors. So

92
00:04:32,920 --> 00:04:35,919
Speaker 5: on one side, our company is already going ahead with

93
00:04:35,920 --> 00:04:39,640
Speaker 5: the construction project two construction projects to build reactor systems,

94
00:04:39,839 --> 00:04:42,840
Speaker 5: and we're talking to data centers and all of those

95
00:04:42,880 --> 00:04:45,239
Speaker 5: sort of groups as well. But on the other side,

96
00:04:45,360 --> 00:04:47,960
Speaker 5: like you know, we even our company, we need to

97
00:04:47,960 --> 00:04:50,479
Speaker 5: get involved in that fuel supply chain and build it

98
00:04:50,520 --> 00:04:52,840
Speaker 5: back because, as Will was saying just before this sort

99
00:04:52,880 --> 00:04:55,920
Speaker 5: of after Three Mile Island, the investment into the country

100
00:04:56,000 --> 00:04:59,360
Speaker 5: sort of broke down a lot. We need that investment

101
00:04:59,360 --> 00:05:02,000
Speaker 5: to go back in into rebuilding that fuel supply chain,

102
00:05:02,120 --> 00:05:06,000
Speaker 5: so companies like ours can mass manufacture the reactor systems.

103
00:05:06,240 --> 00:05:09,240
Speaker 1: But James, on Carol's question about a timeline here, what

104
00:05:09,240 --> 00:05:11,760
Speaker 1: would be a realistic timeline for completion of your first

105
00:05:11,880 --> 00:05:13,360
Speaker 1: modular nuclear reactor.

106
00:05:14,040 --> 00:05:17,360
Speaker 5: So we're doing a dual program right now, as it's

107
00:05:17,360 --> 00:05:21,440
Speaker 5: already started on the site. So we'll have the geotechnical

108
00:05:21,480 --> 00:05:24,360
Speaker 5: data to submit for a construction permit that'll go in

109
00:05:24,560 --> 00:05:26,640
Speaker 5: early next year, and I'll see you will turn that

110
00:05:26,680 --> 00:05:29,839
Speaker 5: around in twenty twenty six. So construction twenty twenty seven,

111
00:05:29,880 --> 00:05:32,799
Speaker 5: twenty twenty eight, twenty twenty nine, and then fully licensed

112
00:05:32,839 --> 00:05:37,720
Speaker 5: reactor operating commercial license twenty thirty is very reasonable timeline.

113
00:05:37,800 --> 00:05:40,280
Speaker 5: So I would say early twenty thirties, then you're going

114
00:05:40,279 --> 00:05:43,599
Speaker 5: to see the mass rollout of reactor systems, so dozens

115
00:05:43,600 --> 00:05:44,720
Speaker 5: on an annual basis.

116
00:05:45,000 --> 00:05:47,440
Speaker 3: Yeah, that timeline fits with what I hear from a

117
00:05:47,440 --> 00:05:52,080
Speaker 3: lot of companies early twenty thirties for a significant wave

118
00:05:52,279 --> 00:05:54,960
Speaker 3: of new power plants. But I guess the issue is

119
00:05:55,000 --> 00:05:58,000
Speaker 3: that we have all these people who want power yesterday.

120
00:05:58,440 --> 00:05:59,720
Speaker 3: How do we meet their needs?

121
00:06:01,240 --> 00:06:03,640
Speaker 5: Look, there's a it's a it's actually a very reasonable question.

122
00:06:03,720 --> 00:06:05,520
Speaker 5: Like as a company, we you know, we want to

123
00:06:05,520 --> 00:06:09,280
Speaker 5: be conservative and truthful with everybody because you know, we've

124
00:06:09,279 --> 00:06:12,000
Speaker 5: got to earn long term trust here. There are good

125
00:06:12,000 --> 00:06:15,359
Speaker 5: interim solutions, like I know companies have been exploring things

126
00:06:15,480 --> 00:06:17,400
Speaker 5: like gas and and to be honest, if they can

127
00:06:17,400 --> 00:06:20,160
Speaker 5: get hold of that in the interim, great, But even

128
00:06:20,200 --> 00:06:23,560
Speaker 5: things like gas contracts, they're all tied up for seven

129
00:06:23,600 --> 00:06:26,160
Speaker 5: eight years. Turbines around gas are tied up for seven

130
00:06:26,200 --> 00:06:29,280
Speaker 5: eight years too, So it's it's there's no easy solution here.

131
00:06:29,480 --> 00:06:32,080
Speaker 5: Even bringing in as you mentioned, like wind and solar

132
00:06:32,160 --> 00:06:35,240
Speaker 5: or anything like that. These are it's amitten technologies which

133
00:06:35,279 --> 00:06:39,400
Speaker 5: require huge battery storage technology to run alongside them. A

134
00:06:39,480 --> 00:06:41,280
Speaker 5: lot of the time, it's just not feasible. They're also

135
00:06:41,360 --> 00:06:44,120
Speaker 5: very locationally dependent, so you be limited on where you

136
00:06:44,160 --> 00:06:47,200
Speaker 5: can even deploy these things. I mean, unfortunately, there's no

137
00:06:47,600 --> 00:06:50,400
Speaker 5: there's no great solution, which is why when the show

138
00:06:50,480 --> 00:06:53,359
Speaker 5: started they were talking about opening up these old power

139
00:06:53,400 --> 00:06:58,360
Speaker 5: stations and recommissioning old nuclear power plants because those are

140
00:06:58,520 --> 00:07:01,039
Speaker 5: the some of them are the interim solutions. It won't

141
00:07:01,080 --> 00:07:02,520
Speaker 5: be enough power, but it'll be some.

142
00:07:03,040 --> 00:07:07,080
Speaker 3: Yeah, those restart projects that fruit. Do you think there

143
00:07:07,120 --> 00:07:09,920
Speaker 3: are other plants that we can restart or is it

144
00:07:10,040 --> 00:07:13,280
Speaker 3: just the ones we've already seen? Are we exhausted that list?

145
00:07:14,720 --> 00:07:17,360
Speaker 5: So it's a good question, Like there's a number have

146
00:07:17,440 --> 00:07:21,960
Speaker 5: been shut down, and like it's it's arguable that you

147
00:07:22,040 --> 00:07:25,400
Speaker 5: mentioned Indian Point as an example. I know it wasn't

148
00:07:25,560 --> 00:07:28,840
Speaker 5: politically popular and maybe there was some of that related

149
00:07:28,880 --> 00:07:32,160
Speaker 5: to the decisions around that kind of plant, that that

150
00:07:32,200 --> 00:07:34,040
Speaker 5: could be an act, that could be a route, even

151
00:07:34,080 --> 00:07:36,200
Speaker 5: the old three Mile Island plant. Since we bring that

152
00:07:36,320 --> 00:07:39,520
Speaker 5: up as I think it's see the Microsoft or Constellation,

153
00:07:39,600 --> 00:07:42,720
Speaker 5: we're involved in recommissioning that and trying to get that

154
00:07:43,040 --> 00:07:43,840
Speaker 5: back up and running.

155
00:07:43,960 --> 00:07:47,000
Speaker 3: Yeah, Constellation says that'll be ready by twenty twenty seven.

156
00:07:47,760 --> 00:07:51,040
Speaker 5: There we go. So, like you know, I think, as

157
00:07:51,080 --> 00:07:54,360
Speaker 5: you say, like there's going to be big projected powering

158
00:07:54,800 --> 00:07:59,040
Speaker 5: demand increases in the country, they might not get solved

159
00:07:59,160 --> 00:08:01,920
Speaker 5: for until we get those twenty thirties. And the problem

160
00:08:02,000 --> 00:08:04,080
Speaker 5: there is that that could mean a stagnation in the

161
00:08:04,080 --> 00:08:07,680
Speaker 5: tech industry. They'll find every means they can to get power.

162
00:08:07,760 --> 00:08:12,840
Speaker 5: But like that big online colocation green technology that provides

163
00:08:12,880 --> 00:08:15,800
Speaker 5: baseload power that can only really come from nuclear and

164
00:08:16,120 --> 00:08:19,200
Speaker 5: a lot of these reactor systems. Despite any really outlandish

165
00:08:19,200 --> 00:08:22,400
Speaker 5: claims about deploying near term, it's it's going to be

166
00:08:22,400 --> 00:08:24,320
Speaker 5: early twenty thirties, twenty thirty and onwards.

167
00:08:24,600 --> 00:08:27,440
Speaker 4: All right, So the demand story is compelling if the

168
00:08:27,480 --> 00:08:29,720
Speaker 4: obstacles are just as a parent, those aren't my words,

169
00:08:29,720 --> 00:08:32,160
Speaker 4: those are well waded words who reports on this sector,

170
00:08:32,200 --> 00:08:35,040
Speaker 4: as you well know. I mean, help me out here though,

171
00:08:36,160 --> 00:08:41,760
Speaker 4: because I'm just wondering. You know, if I'm looking at

172
00:08:41,760 --> 00:08:44,199
Speaker 4: a stock that is up eighty percent year to date,

173
00:08:45,120 --> 00:08:49,439
Speaker 4: you know, you guys don't have any revenues, right, I mean,

174
00:08:49,520 --> 00:08:53,000
Speaker 4: like our investors, you know, this is what we do. Like,

175
00:08:53,120 --> 00:08:55,840
Speaker 4: are they probably getting ahead of themselves. Thirty percent of

176
00:08:55,880 --> 00:08:58,200
Speaker 4: your float is short, so investors are just kind of

177
00:08:58,240 --> 00:09:03,280
Speaker 4: waiting for something negative to hit because they're negative the sentiment.

178
00:09:03,320 --> 00:09:07,360
Speaker 4: I mean, realistically, you're talking at least five years right

179
00:09:07,480 --> 00:09:12,960
Speaker 4: before you're showing significant revenue or earnings or anything along

180
00:09:13,000 --> 00:09:13,600
Speaker 4: those lines.

181
00:09:14,280 --> 00:09:17,080
Speaker 5: No, like our early using on people will come online

182
00:09:17,080 --> 00:09:19,280
Speaker 5: a long time before that. I mean, because there's this

183
00:09:19,440 --> 00:09:21,959
Speaker 5: massive build back. The opportunity at the moment in the

184
00:09:22,040 --> 00:09:24,400
Speaker 5: nuclear space is huge. It can come through the fuel

185
00:09:24,400 --> 00:09:28,040
Speaker 5: supply chain, or transportation or isotopes. Like, the nice part

186
00:09:28,080 --> 00:09:30,440
Speaker 5: is that we're part of this build back effort. So

187
00:09:30,960 --> 00:09:33,520
Speaker 5: and look, the stock market is always about an investment

188
00:09:33,520 --> 00:09:35,640
Speaker 5: in the future. I mean, the nice part is that

189
00:09:36,120 --> 00:09:39,560
Speaker 5: the demand is there in a way that's unprecedented. Like

190
00:09:39,640 --> 00:09:42,000
Speaker 5: buying now really is an investment in the future, and

191
00:09:42,040 --> 00:09:44,400
Speaker 5: a future that's inevitable. The tech industry is not going

192
00:09:44,440 --> 00:09:46,240
Speaker 5: to just give up and pack up and go away.

193
00:09:46,720 --> 00:09:47,480
Speaker 2: But what if what.

194
00:09:47,400 --> 00:09:49,880
Speaker 4: If the what if the AI spend and build that

195
00:09:50,120 --> 00:09:52,439
Speaker 4: is I know, everybody comes out and says no bubble

196
00:09:52,520 --> 00:09:54,360
Speaker 4: or a lot of people do. What if there is though,

197
00:09:54,400 --> 00:09:57,679
Speaker 4: an overspend? Where does that catch you guys? Potentially?

198
00:09:58,480 --> 00:10:01,720
Speaker 5: I think the bubble has only been like discussed around AI.

199
00:10:02,000 --> 00:10:04,079
Speaker 5: But like in terms of data centers, those are things

200
00:10:04,160 --> 00:10:07,280
Speaker 5: that cannot be bubbles. That is, power that's needed for

201
00:10:07,400 --> 00:10:10,320
Speaker 5: our whole tech industry, Like a data center cannot be

202
00:10:10,400 --> 00:10:13,720
Speaker 5: a bubble. Like if you need increased power for computing power,

203
00:10:14,280 --> 00:10:18,559
Speaker 5: it has to come from somewhere AI. Whether that's going

204
00:10:18,600 --> 00:10:21,080
Speaker 5: to bear out the fruits of what's been promised, that

205
00:10:21,160 --> 00:10:25,520
Speaker 5: remains to be seen. But currently it's just expanding. But

206
00:10:25,600 --> 00:10:27,720
Speaker 5: it's it's it's kind of irrelevant to the long term

207
00:10:27,760 --> 00:10:31,640
Speaker 5: power requirements because the electrification of the country, the reindustrialization

208
00:10:31,679 --> 00:10:34,760
Speaker 5: of the country, that's all going ahead. And you mentioned

209
00:10:34,800 --> 00:10:37,800
Speaker 5: stocks like and the short interest. Great, if people want

210
00:10:37,800 --> 00:10:40,480
Speaker 5: to short us, that's better because we've we've gone higher

211
00:10:40,559 --> 00:10:43,079
Speaker 5: and higher as a stock just because every time the

212
00:10:43,120 --> 00:10:45,560
Speaker 5: shorts have been squeezed, the more shorts, the better for

213
00:10:45,640 --> 00:10:47,680
Speaker 5: us because they always.

214
00:10:47,280 --> 00:10:50,240
Speaker 1: Only only ten seconds left. But would you say that

215
00:10:50,480 --> 00:10:53,520
Speaker 1: you are most further along than any other company, the

216
00:10:53,600 --> 00:10:55,559
Speaker 1: most along than any other company.

217
00:10:55,320 --> 00:10:59,640
Speaker 5: In terms of microreactors, yees. I believe we'll have the

218
00:11:01,200 --> 00:11:05,640
Speaker 5: US constructed full scale commercial commercially license my corrector in

219
00:11:05,679 --> 00:11:06,160
Speaker 5: the country.

220
00:11:06,400 --> 00:11:08,320
Speaker 4: Well, you can put an SMR in my backyard because

221
00:11:08,360 --> 00:11:10,840
Speaker 4: my monthly electrical bills are crazy.

222
00:11:11,559 --> 00:11:15,040
Speaker 2: You're shutting off lights. You're glowing today, Yeah, I'm glowing.

223
00:11:15,240 --> 00:11:18,439
Speaker 4: Will Wade of Bloomberg News and James Walker, CEO of

224
00:11:18,559 --> 00:11:21,400
Speaker 4: Nano Nuclear Energy, Guys, thank you so much. Great discussion

225
00:11:21,559 --> 00:11:22,480
Speaker 4: right here on Bloomberg