WEBVTT - The Presidential Debate and Apple's Business in China

0:00:01.320 --> 0:00:05.160
<v Speaker 1>We're from Marhart where innovation, money and power Collie in

0:00:05.240 --> 0:00:10.400
<v Speaker 1>Silicon Valley, NBN. This is Bloomberg Technology with Caroline Hyde.

0:00:10.200 --> 0:00:11.120
<v Speaker 2>And Ed Ludlove.

0:00:25.680 --> 0:00:28.520
<v Speaker 3>I met Ludlow in San Francisco. Caroline Hyde is off.

0:00:28.600 --> 0:00:31.720
<v Speaker 3>This is Bloomberg Technology. Coming up, we have full coverage

0:00:31.720 --> 0:00:34.760
<v Speaker 3>of the first presidential debate and discuss the state of

0:00:34.840 --> 0:00:40.000
<v Speaker 3>crypto with former Republican presidential hopeful Vivek Ramaswami. Plus we'll

0:00:40.000 --> 0:00:43.080
<v Speaker 3>break down Apple's business in China as iPhone shipments jump

0:00:43.159 --> 0:00:47.600
<v Speaker 3>forty percent following discounts, and a new survey shows Tesla's

0:00:47.640 --> 0:00:52.959
<v Speaker 3>design changes are confusing customers and undercutting its quality. Will

0:00:53.000 --> 0:00:57.160
<v Speaker 3>discuss that and so much more through the hour. Happy Friday,

0:00:57.240 --> 0:00:59.320
<v Speaker 3>June twenty eighth, twenty twenty four, Let's get right to

0:00:59.360 --> 0:01:01.720
<v Speaker 3>financial monde markets. The S and P five hundred and

0:01:01.800 --> 0:01:04.560
<v Speaker 3>new all time high, the NASDAK one hundred, a new

0:01:04.600 --> 0:01:09.000
<v Speaker 3>all time high, briefly breaching the twenty thousand mark for

0:01:09.080 --> 0:01:12.640
<v Speaker 3>the first time, yields a little higher, and Bitcoin, even

0:01:12.640 --> 0:01:15.440
<v Speaker 3>though we kind of have this risk on, sentiment softer

0:01:15.520 --> 0:01:18.800
<v Speaker 3>by a percentage point below sixty one thousand US dollars

0:01:18.840 --> 0:01:21.800
<v Speaker 3>per token. The main factor in the markets this morning

0:01:21.959 --> 0:01:27.240
<v Speaker 3>is not the first presidential debate, but the PCE reading decelerating,

0:01:27.520 --> 0:01:32.000
<v Speaker 3>the PCE being the Fed's preferred gauge or measure of inflation.

0:01:32.560 --> 0:01:35.360
<v Speaker 3>That's kind of the discussion on the week. I also

0:01:35.400 --> 0:01:38.480
<v Speaker 3>want to take a look at one specific name in

0:01:38.560 --> 0:01:40.960
<v Speaker 3>the context of what we are about to talk about,

0:01:40.959 --> 0:01:44.640
<v Speaker 3>which is the presidential debates, and that is Trump Media

0:01:44.680 --> 0:01:49.120
<v Speaker 3>and Technology Group. This morning, we actually traded significantly higher,

0:01:49.160 --> 0:01:51.280
<v Speaker 3>maybe more than three and a half percent. You see

0:01:51.280 --> 0:01:55.280
<v Speaker 3>that we're now down six tenths of a percent. This is,

0:01:55.400 --> 0:01:59.000
<v Speaker 3>of course the parent company, a true social that a

0:01:59.000 --> 0:02:02.800
<v Speaker 3>company went public via a spack with ownership ties to

0:02:02.840 --> 0:02:06.360
<v Speaker 3>Donald Trump. We will get to this in due course,

0:02:06.440 --> 0:02:08.760
<v Speaker 3>but for now, let's get a recap of the first

0:02:08.800 --> 0:02:12.440
<v Speaker 3>presidential debate hosted by CNN that took place in Atlanta

0:02:12.520 --> 0:02:13.000
<v Speaker 3>last night.

0:02:14.040 --> 0:02:16.239
<v Speaker 4>There's more to be done. There's more to be done.

0:02:16.360 --> 0:02:18.080
<v Speaker 4>Working class people are still in trouble.

0:02:18.200 --> 0:02:19.960
<v Speaker 5>He has not done a good job, He's done a

0:02:19.960 --> 0:02:22.960
<v Speaker 5>poor job. And inflation's killing our country. It is absolutely

0:02:23.080 --> 0:02:23.600
<v Speaker 5>killing us.

0:02:23.680 --> 0:02:26.240
<v Speaker 4>Price of eggs, the price of gas, the price of housing,

0:02:26.280 --> 0:02:28.200
<v Speaker 4>the price of a whole range of things. That's why

0:02:28.240 --> 0:02:30.600
<v Speaker 4>I'm working so hard to make sure I deal with

0:02:30.639 --> 0:02:35.399
<v Speaker 4>those problems. I was recently in France for D Day

0:02:35.919 --> 0:02:38.560
<v Speaker 4>and I spoke to all about those heroes that died.

0:02:38.919 --> 0:02:41.520
<v Speaker 4>I went to the World War II cemetery, World War

0:02:41.560 --> 0:02:44.120
<v Speaker 4>One cemetery. He refused to go to. He was standing

0:02:44.120 --> 0:02:46.560
<v Speaker 4>with his four star general and he told me, said,

0:02:46.560 --> 0:02:47.840
<v Speaker 4>I don't want to go in there because they're a

0:02:47.880 --> 0:02:50.840
<v Speaker 4>bunch of losers and suckers. My son was not a loser,

0:02:50.960 --> 0:02:53.520
<v Speaker 4>was not a sucker. You're the sucker. You're the loser.

0:02:53.639 --> 0:02:56.320
<v Speaker 5>There's nobody that's taken better care of our soldiers than

0:02:56.360 --> 0:02:59.080
<v Speaker 5>I have. The money that we're spending on this war,

0:03:00.160 --> 0:03:03.120
<v Speaker 5>we shouldn't be spending. It should have never happened. I

0:03:03.160 --> 0:03:07.639
<v Speaker 5>will have that war settled between Putin and Zelensky as

0:03:07.760 --> 0:03:11.000
<v Speaker 5>president elect before I take office on January twentieth. I'll

0:03:11.040 --> 0:03:13.280
<v Speaker 5>have that war settled. If we had a real president,

0:03:13.360 --> 0:03:16.920
<v Speaker 5>the president that knew that was respected by Putin, he

0:03:16.960 --> 0:03:19.960
<v Speaker 5>would have never he would have never invaded Ukraine. Israel

0:03:19.960 --> 0:03:24.359
<v Speaker 5>would have never been invaded in a million years by Hamas.

0:03:24.960 --> 0:03:28.120
<v Speaker 5>You know why, because Iran was broke with me. I

0:03:28.160 --> 0:03:30.160
<v Speaker 5>wouldn't let anybody do business with him.

0:03:30.200 --> 0:03:35.280
<v Speaker 4>Everyone from the United Nations Security Security Council straight through

0:03:35.280 --> 0:03:38.040
<v Speaker 4>to the G seven to the Israelis and Netnaw himself

0:03:38.080 --> 0:03:40.160
<v Speaker 4>have endorsed a plan. The only one who wants the

0:03:40.160 --> 0:03:42.320
<v Speaker 4>war to continue is Hamas under Roe v.

0:03:42.440 --> 0:03:45.680
<v Speaker 5>Wade, you have late term abortion, you can do whatever

0:03:45.680 --> 0:03:47.640
<v Speaker 5>you want. Depending on the state, you can do whatever

0:03:47.680 --> 0:03:49.880
<v Speaker 5>you want. We don't think that's a good thing. We

0:03:49.960 --> 0:03:52.560
<v Speaker 5>think it's a radical thing. We think the Democrats of

0:03:52.600 --> 0:03:54.320
<v Speaker 5>the radicals, not the Republicans.

0:03:54.440 --> 0:03:57.280
<v Speaker 4>It's been a terrible thing, what you've done. The fact

0:03:57.400 --> 0:04:00.119
<v Speaker 4>is that the vast majority of consuls and scholars support

0:04:00.200 --> 0:04:03.720
<v Speaker 4>ROW when it was decided support it ROW, and that

0:04:03.800 --> 0:04:06.160
<v Speaker 4>was that's this idea that they are all against. It

0:04:06.200 --> 0:04:08.560
<v Speaker 4>is just ridiculous. This guy's three years younger and a

0:04:08.600 --> 0:04:09.480
<v Speaker 4>lot less competent.

0:04:09.600 --> 0:04:12.120
<v Speaker 5>Well, I took two tests, cognitive tests. I ast them.

0:04:12.200 --> 0:04:14.400
<v Speaker 6>I just won two club championships.

0:04:17.000 --> 0:04:20.280
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg's Kaye Lines joins us with more from DC and Kaylee,

0:04:20.360 --> 0:04:22.120
<v Speaker 3>I just want to read you the headline of the

0:04:22.160 --> 0:04:26.560
<v Speaker 3>most read story on Bloomberg this morning, Biden's disastrous debate

0:04:26.760 --> 0:04:33.080
<v Speaker 3>accelerates doubts over candidacy. Let's start with how poorly Biden

0:04:33.200 --> 0:04:35.840
<v Speaker 3>is perceived to have performed relative to Trump in that.

0:04:35.839 --> 0:04:38.520
<v Speaker 6>Debate incredibly poorly.

0:04:38.680 --> 0:04:43.200
<v Speaker 7>Edin you have bipartisan lawmaker's political strategists saying that this

0:04:43.320 --> 0:04:45.880
<v Speaker 7>morning Joe Biden, at eighty one years old, very much

0:04:45.960 --> 0:04:49.000
<v Speaker 7>showed that he is an octogenarian president. The White House

0:04:49.000 --> 0:04:51.120
<v Speaker 7>has now said that he was battling a cold, but

0:04:51.200 --> 0:04:53.720
<v Speaker 7>his voice was raspy at times, his speech was halting,

0:04:53.760 --> 0:04:56.760
<v Speaker 7>He took many long pauses, misstated facts, at one point

0:04:57.080 --> 0:05:03.120
<v Speaker 7>actually saying that he beat medicare dis not adequately articulating

0:05:03.120 --> 0:05:05.920
<v Speaker 7>his own policy in many instances, which gave Donald Trump

0:05:06.480 --> 0:05:09.599
<v Speaker 7>many openings to attack him. Donald Trump, for his part,

0:05:09.640 --> 0:05:13.440
<v Speaker 7>seemed much more energetic focused, uncharacteristically so perhaps for the

0:05:13.480 --> 0:05:16.839
<v Speaker 7>Donald Trump that we typically see at campaign rallies, working

0:05:16.880 --> 0:05:19.080
<v Speaker 7>within the format of this debate, which of course was

0:05:19.160 --> 0:05:21.159
<v Speaker 7>Mike's cut off when it was not your turn to speak,

0:05:21.320 --> 0:05:24.120
<v Speaker 7>lack of a live studio audience. Things that the prevailing

0:05:24.160 --> 0:05:26.880
<v Speaker 7>notion was might help Biden more going into the debate

0:05:26.960 --> 0:05:30.360
<v Speaker 7>actually turned out to potentially be advantageous to Donald Trump.

0:05:30.440 --> 0:05:34.240
<v Speaker 7>That said, Donald Trump did lie repeatedly throughout this debate

0:05:34.279 --> 0:05:37.479
<v Speaker 7>on things like economic statistics under his administration, like the

0:05:37.480 --> 0:05:40.239
<v Speaker 7>lowest black unemployment rate of all time that actually happened

0:05:40.760 --> 0:05:43.480
<v Speaker 7>during the Biden administration. He said that tariffs would not

0:05:43.920 --> 0:05:47.599
<v Speaker 7>cause higher inflation, something that almost every single economist.

0:05:47.200 --> 0:05:48.920
<v Speaker 6>We speak to would dispute.

0:05:49.000 --> 0:05:51.560
<v Speaker 7>He also said that he didn't say things that he

0:05:51.640 --> 0:05:54.360
<v Speaker 7>has said on tape right again about the outcome of

0:05:54.400 --> 0:05:57.279
<v Speaker 7>the twenty twenty election, and yet was not fact checked

0:05:57.279 --> 0:06:00.560
<v Speaker 7>by the moderators and was struggling Joe Biden struggling to

0:06:00.600 --> 0:06:02.719
<v Speaker 7>fact check him himself. He repeatedly called him out for

0:06:02.800 --> 0:06:05.080
<v Speaker 7>lying many times, but then could not articulate what the

0:06:05.120 --> 0:06:07.320
<v Speaker 7>actual truth of the matter was. So all in all,

0:06:07.520 --> 0:06:10.560
<v Speaker 7>it was a very difficult night for Joe Biden, and

0:06:10.600 --> 0:06:12.760
<v Speaker 7>there is a lot of talk here in Washington this morning,

0:06:12.880 --> 0:06:15.680
<v Speaker 7>including from those within the Democratic Party, as to whether

0:06:15.760 --> 0:06:18.440
<v Speaker 7>or not he can actually go forward as the nominee.

0:06:19.320 --> 0:06:21.880
<v Speaker 3>The placement of the debate, as well as the words

0:06:21.960 --> 0:06:26.960
<v Speaker 3>Joe Biden on Google trends, for example, is interesting. Unsurprisingly,

0:06:27.480 --> 0:06:29.880
<v Speaker 3>all of the names involved are trending on x, the

0:06:29.880 --> 0:06:31.440
<v Speaker 3>platform formerly known as Twitter.

0:06:32.440 --> 0:06:33.360
<v Speaker 6>We've woken up to.

0:06:33.360 --> 0:06:37.760
<v Speaker 3>A world this morning, perhaps different to what we expected,

0:06:37.839 --> 0:06:42.760
<v Speaker 3>where we are debating President Trump's candidacy and what might

0:06:42.839 --> 0:06:44.760
<v Speaker 3>happen next. It's a long way to go to the

0:06:44.800 --> 0:06:48.440
<v Speaker 3>next debate in September ahead of the election in November.

0:06:48.480 --> 0:06:50.280
<v Speaker 6>What are you hearing in Washington, d C.

0:06:52.360 --> 0:06:54.960
<v Speaker 7>Well, there is this idea that considering this was a

0:06:55.080 --> 0:06:57.880
<v Speaker 7>very early debate, this happened in June before either Trump

0:06:58.040 --> 0:07:00.400
<v Speaker 7>or Biden are officially their party's nominees. At this point,

0:07:00.400 --> 0:07:03.200
<v Speaker 7>they're still just presumptive nominees. There is a question of

0:07:03.240 --> 0:07:05.960
<v Speaker 7>when we get to that Democratic Convention in Chicago as

0:07:06.000 --> 0:07:07.760
<v Speaker 7>to whether or not it might be an open convention.

0:07:07.800 --> 0:07:11.120
<v Speaker 7>Of course, that is his decision only President Biden is

0:07:11.160 --> 0:07:14.239
<v Speaker 7>able to make. He already has had the adequate number

0:07:14.280 --> 0:07:16.920
<v Speaker 7>of delegates to secure the nomination pledged to him. They

0:07:16.960 --> 0:07:19.440
<v Speaker 7>have to remain so unless he decides to drop out

0:07:19.440 --> 0:07:21.840
<v Speaker 7>of the race and direct them to cast their votes

0:07:22.040 --> 0:07:24.240
<v Speaker 7>for someone else. Of course, that is a decision that

0:07:24.280 --> 0:07:26.800
<v Speaker 7>the President those close to him, including the First Lady

0:07:26.920 --> 0:07:28.480
<v Speaker 7>Joe Biden, will have to make. But that is a

0:07:28.600 --> 0:07:32.200
<v Speaker 7>very real conversation that is happening here in Washington, and

0:07:32.280 --> 0:07:34.360
<v Speaker 7>was happening in Atlanta last night, where a number of

0:07:34.440 --> 0:07:36.160
<v Speaker 7>the surrogates that were there in the spin room for

0:07:36.200 --> 0:07:39.360
<v Speaker 7>the Biden campaign included those who potentially the prevailing thought

0:07:39.400 --> 0:07:41.840
<v Speaker 7>is could be someone who is the nominee instead of him,

0:07:41.880 --> 0:07:44.560
<v Speaker 7>like California Governor Gavin Newsom, who was swarmed when he

0:07:44.640 --> 0:07:46.920
<v Speaker 7>hit the spin room floor after the debate. Now, he

0:07:46.920 --> 0:07:48.960
<v Speaker 7>did say Joe Biden is going to be the nominee

0:07:48.960 --> 0:07:52.240
<v Speaker 7>that he has as full backing. Other potentials like Michigan

0:07:52.280 --> 0:07:55.040
<v Speaker 7>Governor Gretchen Whitmanner have said the same within the last

0:07:55.040 --> 0:07:58.200
<v Speaker 7>twenty four hours. But it certainly is a great difficulty

0:07:58.240 --> 0:08:02.080
<v Speaker 7>that the Democratic Party at largest space as they struggle

0:08:02.080 --> 0:08:04.160
<v Speaker 7>with this idea that Donald Trump does seem now to

0:08:04.160 --> 0:08:06.960
<v Speaker 7>be even farther ahead in this race, if betting markets

0:08:07.160 --> 0:08:09.800
<v Speaker 7>are to be believed, than he was heading in.

0:08:09.400 --> 0:08:10.160
<v Speaker 6>To this debate.

0:08:11.320 --> 0:08:13.920
<v Speaker 3>Finally, Kayley, and quickly, you know what I see on

0:08:13.960 --> 0:08:17.960
<v Speaker 3>social media, beyond the memes and endless clips that have

0:08:18.080 --> 0:08:21.920
<v Speaker 3>been shared, is a frustration from American voters that they

0:08:21.920 --> 0:08:25.600
<v Speaker 3>didn't learn anything. There was actually no answer to many

0:08:25.600 --> 0:08:29.120
<v Speaker 3>of the questions posed from a policy or platform perspective.

0:08:29.440 --> 0:08:32.200
<v Speaker 3>Going into a presidential election campaign.

0:08:33.280 --> 0:08:36.320
<v Speaker 7>No frequently, and they did not answer the questions that

0:08:36.480 --> 0:08:39.199
<v Speaker 7>were directed at them at all, instead pivoting to entirely

0:08:39.840 --> 0:08:42.560
<v Speaker 7>different subjects. Certainly you saw social media in a tizzy

0:08:42.679 --> 0:08:45.600
<v Speaker 7>not even fifteen minutes into this debate, many Democrats expressing

0:08:45.640 --> 0:08:48.240
<v Speaker 7>exasperation with the performance of Joe Biden, but many others

0:08:48.320 --> 0:08:51.520
<v Speaker 7>still calling into question how the US ended up with

0:08:51.600 --> 0:08:53.959
<v Speaker 7>these two as candidates. We know that voters are very

0:08:54.040 --> 0:08:58.040
<v Speaker 7>unhappy with these choices. They are hoping for any other choice,

0:08:58.080 --> 0:08:59.960
<v Speaker 7>which is why you are seeing other third party camp

0:09:00.000 --> 0:09:03.080
<v Speaker 7>and it's like RFK Junior gaining more support. But certainly

0:09:03.080 --> 0:09:05.240
<v Speaker 7>there is a lot of frustration among the voting populace

0:09:05.240 --> 0:09:07.760
<v Speaker 7>as to what they saw last night. And I would

0:09:07.760 --> 0:09:10.240
<v Speaker 7>just point out when voters wanted to hear about the issues,

0:09:10.280 --> 0:09:13.560
<v Speaker 7>even issues that Joe Biden, what we understood from his campaign,

0:09:13.600 --> 0:09:15.800
<v Speaker 7>were planning to drive home on hit Donald Trump hard

0:09:15.800 --> 0:09:18.960
<v Speaker 7>on like abortion or democracy. Many of those moments were missed.

0:09:19.000 --> 0:09:20.840
<v Speaker 7>At one point, when he was talking about abortion, it

0:09:20.880 --> 0:09:25.040
<v Speaker 7>spiraled into a story about immigration and a woman who

0:09:25.040 --> 0:09:28.640
<v Speaker 7>had been murdering. It got very confusing at times. It

0:09:28.679 --> 0:09:31.760
<v Speaker 7>was really difficult for policy to break through for either

0:09:31.920 --> 0:09:34.640
<v Speaker 7>of these candidates at all. And of course, even under

0:09:34.640 --> 0:09:37.400
<v Speaker 7>direct questioning, Donald Trump was asked repeatedly if he would

0:09:37.440 --> 0:09:40.600
<v Speaker 7>accept the results of this election, no matter what the

0:09:40.640 --> 0:09:43.000
<v Speaker 7>outcome was, and he would not give a straight yes

0:09:43.080 --> 0:09:43.680
<v Speaker 7>or no answer.

0:09:44.679 --> 0:09:47.280
<v Speaker 3>Bloombo's Katie lyones out of Washington, d C. A late

0:09:47.360 --> 0:09:49.079
<v Speaker 3>night for you. Grateful to have you with us on

0:09:49.120 --> 0:09:53.600
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg Technology. Surprise for many to the world we woke

0:09:53.679 --> 0:09:56.400
<v Speaker 3>up to this morning. But we'll keep the conversation going

0:09:56.440 --> 0:09:59.440
<v Speaker 3>because coming up we will be joined by former Republican

0:09:59.480 --> 0:10:03.440
<v Speaker 3>presidential candidate Vivek Ramaswami for his take on last night's

0:10:03.480 --> 0:10:08.360
<v Speaker 3>presidential debate. Bloomberg has reporting that mister Ramaswami is close

0:10:08.440 --> 0:10:11.360
<v Speaker 3>to Trump and the Trump team and advising on some

0:10:11.480 --> 0:10:14.760
<v Speaker 3>areas of tech policy. That's the conversation we're going to have.

0:10:15.200 --> 0:10:33.760
<v Speaker 3>This is Bloomberg Technology. Let's break down the presidential debate

0:10:33.800 --> 0:10:37.840
<v Speaker 3>from last night with Vivek Ramaswami, a former Republican candidate himself.

0:10:37.880 --> 0:10:41.320
<v Speaker 3>He joins me now from Atlanta. Mister Ramaswami, Good morning

0:10:41.360 --> 0:10:45.720
<v Speaker 3>to you this Morningberg Technology. We're a technology show and

0:10:45.760 --> 0:10:48.600
<v Speaker 3>I've wanted to ask you to come on following the

0:10:48.640 --> 0:10:51.760
<v Speaker 3>debate because of your background, because of the reporting of

0:10:51.800 --> 0:10:56.360
<v Speaker 3>your relationship with former President Trump and the Trump campaign team.

0:10:56.679 --> 0:10:59.480
<v Speaker 3>But we should talk about last night so the floor

0:10:59.600 --> 0:11:00.120
<v Speaker 3>is yours.

0:11:00.120 --> 0:11:02.559
<v Speaker 6>Your reaction to that debate, Well, look, I was.

0:11:02.480 --> 0:11:04.520
<v Speaker 2>In Atlanta last night, got back to my home in

0:11:04.559 --> 0:11:07.040
<v Speaker 2>Columbus today, and after sleeping on it, my conclusion is

0:11:07.040 --> 0:11:09.480
<v Speaker 2>the same as what we saw last night, which is

0:11:09.760 --> 0:11:11.880
<v Speaker 2>this was sad for the United States of America to

0:11:11.920 --> 0:11:15.120
<v Speaker 2>see the current President, Joe Biden in the mental state

0:11:15.160 --> 0:11:17.120
<v Speaker 2>that is actually in. There was a lot of joking

0:11:17.120 --> 0:11:19.079
<v Speaker 2>about drug testing or were they going to drug him up?

0:11:19.360 --> 0:11:21.200
<v Speaker 2>It looked more like he had a lobotomy, and I

0:11:21.280 --> 0:11:24.000
<v Speaker 2>just think that that's a sad thing, speaking as an American,

0:11:24.480 --> 0:11:27.439
<v Speaker 2>regardless of partisanship, when you think about the country that

0:11:27.480 --> 0:11:30.640
<v Speaker 2>has produced the greatness of innovation and the leaders leading

0:11:30.679 --> 0:11:33.439
<v Speaker 2>companies in the private sector. To see the person who's

0:11:33.520 --> 0:11:36.120
<v Speaker 2>leading the federal government himself be as absent as he

0:11:36.240 --> 0:11:39.400
<v Speaker 2>was yesterday, I think is really a damning indictment of

0:11:39.440 --> 0:11:41.600
<v Speaker 2>the modern Democratic Party now the president.

0:11:42.760 --> 0:11:45.560
<v Speaker 3>Yep, mister Ramswami, may I just jump in, and it's

0:11:45.600 --> 0:11:50.800
<v Speaker 3>interesting that that you ran as a president's candidate for

0:11:50.880 --> 0:11:55.920
<v Speaker 3>the Republican Party. You're representing former President Trump, but you

0:11:56.000 --> 0:11:59.240
<v Speaker 3>started by speaking about President Biden's performance.

0:12:00.000 --> 0:12:01.400
<v Speaker 6>Any of frustrated this morning.

0:12:01.120 --> 0:12:03.920
<v Speaker 3>That we actually didn't hear any answers to the questions

0:12:04.000 --> 0:12:07.360
<v Speaker 3>posed to former President Trump about what he would do

0:12:07.440 --> 0:12:10.600
<v Speaker 3>if re elected, what some of his policy platforms were.

0:12:10.800 --> 0:12:14.400
<v Speaker 3>What did you learn about what former President Trump might

0:12:14.480 --> 0:12:16.640
<v Speaker 3>do were he to be re elected to the White House.

0:12:17.280 --> 0:12:18.920
<v Speaker 2>Well, he asked me about my impressions. And I think

0:12:18.920 --> 0:12:21.079
<v Speaker 2>the number one most salient thing about the debate for

0:12:21.120 --> 0:12:23.360
<v Speaker 2>anybody who watched it was in needed the surprise of

0:12:23.400 --> 0:12:25.800
<v Speaker 2>Biden's performance, which is why I commented on it in

0:12:25.840 --> 0:12:27.800
<v Speaker 2>response to your question. But I agree with you it's

0:12:27.840 --> 0:12:30.240
<v Speaker 2>much more productive to talk about the policy vision of

0:12:30.280 --> 0:12:32.600
<v Speaker 2>the man who's likely to be the next president, which

0:12:32.600 --> 0:12:34.160
<v Speaker 2>is Donald Trump. And I think one of the things

0:12:34.200 --> 0:12:37.040
<v Speaker 2>we took away from yesterday was talking about the revival

0:12:37.040 --> 0:12:40.080
<v Speaker 2>of American success and a focus on the economy. The

0:12:40.080 --> 0:12:42.560
<v Speaker 2>fact of the matter is President Trump, I think demonstrated

0:12:42.559 --> 0:12:45.800
<v Speaker 2>that despite being a member of a different economic class

0:12:45.840 --> 0:12:48.600
<v Speaker 2>than most Americans as a billionaire, he is still somebody

0:12:48.600 --> 0:12:52.880
<v Speaker 2>who understands prices have gone up but wages have remained flat.

0:12:52.920 --> 0:12:55.680
<v Speaker 2>And I think that part really landed. I wish the

0:12:55.720 --> 0:12:58.880
<v Speaker 2>debate had gone into greater depth on policy. Frankly, if

0:12:58.880 --> 0:13:01.200
<v Speaker 2>Biden had shown up with great mental acuity. We might

0:13:01.240 --> 0:13:03.440
<v Speaker 2>have had that opportunity. In many cases, the things he

0:13:03.440 --> 0:13:05.760
<v Speaker 2>said were incoherent. That stopped that debate for me as

0:13:05.840 --> 0:13:07.960
<v Speaker 2>useful as it could. But what do we learn last

0:13:08.040 --> 0:13:10.480
<v Speaker 2>night and then the combination of recent speeches that President

0:13:10.480 --> 0:13:14.200
<v Speaker 2>Trump has given. Economic growth is a core objective for

0:13:14.280 --> 0:13:16.719
<v Speaker 2>Donald Trump. That's not a left leaning message or a

0:13:16.800 --> 0:13:20.559
<v Speaker 2>right leaning message. Economic growth is an inherent and worthy objective.

0:13:20.800 --> 0:13:23.560
<v Speaker 2>From bringing down the tax burden, to the regulatory burden,

0:13:23.840 --> 0:13:26.719
<v Speaker 2>to drilling for oil and natural gas and increasing the

0:13:26.760 --> 0:13:29.920
<v Speaker 2>supply of energy to bring down costs. Those are core

0:13:30.000 --> 0:13:32.240
<v Speaker 2>issues that I think matter not only to business owners

0:13:32.440 --> 0:13:35.560
<v Speaker 2>and economically minded voters. It's a factor that matters to

0:13:35.679 --> 0:13:37.480
<v Speaker 2>all voters. And that was one of the more powerful

0:13:37.480 --> 0:13:39.720
<v Speaker 2>things that came out of last night was the discussion

0:13:39.760 --> 0:13:42.400
<v Speaker 2>about the economy and the economic vision for the next

0:13:42.400 --> 0:13:42.960
<v Speaker 2>four years.

0:13:43.559 --> 0:13:45.880
<v Speaker 3>Mister Remeswome, may I just point out what you said

0:13:46.200 --> 0:13:50.080
<v Speaker 3>on prices and also wage inflation. You said prices have

0:13:50.120 --> 0:13:52.720
<v Speaker 3>gone up, what wages have remained flat? That is no

0:13:52.840 --> 0:13:55.280
<v Speaker 3>longer true. If you look today. We saw inflation in

0:13:55.360 --> 0:14:00.600
<v Speaker 3>May down fractionally almost company to be ages we're up

0:14:00.679 --> 0:14:02.640
<v Speaker 3>seven tenths of a percent. I just want to get

0:14:02.679 --> 0:14:05.960
<v Speaker 3>the latest dates me out. Let me just comment on

0:14:06.040 --> 0:14:08.640
<v Speaker 3>that in direct response to you. So your numbers, guy,

0:14:08.679 --> 0:14:10.360
<v Speaker 3>I like that, as you well know.

0:14:10.480 --> 0:14:14.120
<v Speaker 2>I believe you well know. Inflation is accumulative, right, So

0:14:14.160 --> 0:14:15.680
<v Speaker 2>that is the inflation rate.

0:14:16.080 --> 0:14:17.319
<v Speaker 6>But inflation over.

0:14:17.160 --> 0:14:18.880
<v Speaker 2>The course of the last several years. You want to

0:14:18.920 --> 0:14:21.600
<v Speaker 2>look at actual mini consumer goods and products are up

0:14:21.600 --> 0:14:24.960
<v Speaker 2>by over fifty percent since the time Biden took office.

0:14:25.080 --> 0:14:27.160
<v Speaker 2>How much does a carton of egg cost? How much does

0:14:27.200 --> 0:14:29.840
<v Speaker 2>a car cost? How much is your electric bill? Those

0:14:29.880 --> 0:14:32.760
<v Speaker 2>are undoubtedly higher than when Joe Biden took office, and

0:14:32.800 --> 0:14:35.120
<v Speaker 2>it is a hard fact that wages have not gone

0:14:35.200 --> 0:14:36.640
<v Speaker 2>up at the same rate. So I don't want to

0:14:36.840 --> 0:14:39.000
<v Speaker 2>play this verbal jiu jitsu of the last month's numbers.

0:14:39.000 --> 0:14:40.400
<v Speaker 2>If you want to get into facts, I'm all in

0:14:40.400 --> 0:14:43.360
<v Speaker 2>favor of it. Those are the hard, indisputable facts, and

0:14:43.400 --> 0:14:45.120
<v Speaker 2>we don't have to argue the facts because most Americans

0:14:45.160 --> 0:14:47.680
<v Speaker 2>who pay those bills already have a deep understanding of that.

0:14:48.040 --> 0:14:49.440
<v Speaker 2>And I do think that is going to be a

0:14:49.480 --> 0:14:51.800
<v Speaker 2>guiding force in what we see this November.

0:14:52.640 --> 0:14:55.080
<v Speaker 3>Mister Ramasami, you and I both agreed on one thing,

0:14:55.120 --> 0:14:58.160
<v Speaker 3>which is that we will talk about technology and policy

0:14:58.200 --> 0:15:02.120
<v Speaker 3>from it from a technology standpoint. You mentioned energy and

0:15:02.200 --> 0:15:04.520
<v Speaker 3>oil in particular. One of the things that I reported

0:15:05.160 --> 0:15:09.080
<v Speaker 3>was that you act as almost in intermediary between former

0:15:09.120 --> 0:15:12.680
<v Speaker 3>President Trump and Elon Musk, and it seems as if

0:15:13.080 --> 0:15:17.000
<v Speaker 3>the former president in Elon Musk are now speaking.

0:15:16.720 --> 0:15:18.040
<v Speaker 6>Or at least have spoken.

0:15:19.040 --> 0:15:22.520
<v Speaker 3>Where do you see them finding middle ground and an

0:15:22.560 --> 0:15:25.800
<v Speaker 3>influence if former President Trump were to return to the

0:15:25.800 --> 0:15:26.360
<v Speaker 3>White House.

0:15:27.280 --> 0:15:29.840
<v Speaker 2>I respect the two of them individually, both as people

0:15:29.840 --> 0:15:32.480
<v Speaker 2>who have succeeded in this country through the private sector.

0:15:32.840 --> 0:15:34.680
<v Speaker 2>I think we all share a belief, all three of us,

0:15:34.760 --> 0:15:37.800
<v Speaker 2>that we need more of those voices in American politics

0:15:37.880 --> 0:15:41.440
<v Speaker 2>driving change, not as professional politicians, but people who look

0:15:41.480 --> 0:15:44.760
<v Speaker 2>at political problems through the lens of an entrepreneur and

0:15:44.800 --> 0:15:47.160
<v Speaker 2>a business leader objectively. And so I think that that's

0:15:47.160 --> 0:15:50.000
<v Speaker 2>a common cause that I would say is formIn basis

0:15:50.040 --> 0:15:52.560
<v Speaker 2>for the friendship with both of them. The reality is

0:15:52.560 --> 0:15:54.360
<v Speaker 2>one of the things that we're all rooting for as well,

0:15:54.680 --> 0:15:57.480
<v Speaker 2>is not only an economic revitalization of the US, but

0:15:57.520 --> 0:16:01.160
<v Speaker 2>a revitalization of innovation in the United States of America.

0:16:01.280 --> 0:16:03.160
<v Speaker 2>I think we have seen a decline in the rate

0:16:03.200 --> 0:16:06.160
<v Speaker 2>of innovation in the US. But that is ultimately our

0:16:06.240 --> 0:16:09.880
<v Speaker 2>competitive advantage in the end is the ultimate innovation and

0:16:09.920 --> 0:16:13.520
<v Speaker 2>the innovative spark of starting the greatest companies known to mankind,

0:16:13.880 --> 0:16:16.640
<v Speaker 2>generally here in the United States, which then has collateral

0:16:16.680 --> 0:16:20.040
<v Speaker 2>benefits of creating jobs and creating wealth. But it's also

0:16:20.080 --> 0:16:24.120
<v Speaker 2>the founding spark of American exceptionalism. Right Our founding fathers

0:16:24.160 --> 0:16:26.680
<v Speaker 2>were the likes of Thomas Jefferson, who not only wrote

0:16:26.720 --> 0:16:30.080
<v Speaker 2>the Declaration of Independence, he also invented the swivel chair

0:16:30.160 --> 0:16:33.160
<v Speaker 2>and the polygraph test. Benjamin Franklin. I think of Elon

0:16:33.240 --> 0:16:36.080
<v Speaker 2>Musk as a modern Benjamin Franklin type of figure. Invented

0:16:36.120 --> 0:16:39.120
<v Speaker 2>the lightning rod and the Franklin stove. Yet these were

0:16:39.160 --> 0:16:41.800
<v Speaker 2>also the people who led the country politically and set

0:16:41.840 --> 0:16:44.080
<v Speaker 2>it into motion. So I think we have a chance

0:16:44.160 --> 0:16:47.440
<v Speaker 2>to revive that seventeen seventy six kind of spirit. And

0:16:47.480 --> 0:16:49.840
<v Speaker 2>I think there's a role for a modern Washington, a

0:16:49.880 --> 0:16:53.400
<v Speaker 2>modern Jefferson, a modern Benjamin Franklin. I think in many

0:16:53.400 --> 0:16:55.280
<v Speaker 2>ways Donald Trump is stepping up to be the modern

0:16:55.320 --> 0:16:58.040
<v Speaker 2>George Washington of our time. Elon Musk reminds me of

0:16:58.080 --> 0:16:59.880
<v Speaker 2>the Benjamin Franklins of their day, and so I think

0:16:59.880 --> 0:17:02.360
<v Speaker 2>we found different common cars in our love of this

0:17:02.520 --> 0:17:05.840
<v Speaker 2>country to revitalize that founding spirit. Even though each of

0:17:05.880 --> 0:17:08.639
<v Speaker 2>us have had our own successes separately in the private sector.

0:17:09.000 --> 0:17:10.440
<v Speaker 2>And I'm biased, but I'm of the view that we

0:17:10.480 --> 0:17:12.560
<v Speaker 2>need actually more of those people stepping up to play

0:17:12.600 --> 0:17:15.920
<v Speaker 2>different roles in defining the future of our politics in America.

0:17:16.080 --> 0:17:18.440
<v Speaker 3>Mister Ramaswami, can I ask just very quickly, is as

0:17:18.640 --> 0:17:21.280
<v Speaker 3>a matter of checking, have you spoken to the former

0:17:21.320 --> 0:17:22.640
<v Speaker 3>president since last night?

0:17:23.480 --> 0:17:25.199
<v Speaker 2>I haven't spoken to him since last night. No.

0:17:26.880 --> 0:17:29.960
<v Speaker 3>The reason I ask is about your role with him

0:17:30.000 --> 0:17:33.159
<v Speaker 3>directly and also his team. You know, one of the

0:17:33.240 --> 0:17:37.119
<v Speaker 3>areas of reporting of focuses been discussions you may have

0:17:37.160 --> 0:17:40.400
<v Speaker 3>had with him around crypto and the role that crypto

0:17:40.480 --> 0:17:44.159
<v Speaker 3>may play if former President Trump returned to the White House.

0:17:44.320 --> 0:17:45.840
<v Speaker 3>Could you tell me a bit about that and the

0:17:45.880 --> 0:17:48.480
<v Speaker 3>conversations that you've had someone that.

0:17:48.520 --> 0:17:51.040
<v Speaker 2>Started actually after I left the race. I left the

0:17:51.119 --> 0:17:53.800
<v Speaker 2>race after the Iowa caucus, but before the New Hampshire primary,

0:17:53.840 --> 0:17:55.840
<v Speaker 2>and I could tell you one part that was sort

0:17:55.880 --> 0:17:58.280
<v Speaker 2>of totally public on that stage was in New Hampshire

0:17:58.359 --> 0:18:01.359
<v Speaker 2>began my conversations with Donald trum about why in my

0:18:01.480 --> 0:18:05.080
<v Speaker 2>campaign I had been opposed to a central bank digital

0:18:05.119 --> 0:18:08.320
<v Speaker 2>currency a CBDC. And one of the things that impressed

0:18:08.359 --> 0:18:11.600
<v Speaker 2>me about President Trump was his intellectual curiosity about that issue.

0:18:11.680 --> 0:18:14.520
<v Speaker 2>I've met a lot of politicians, including Republicans, who have

0:18:14.600 --> 0:18:17.360
<v Speaker 2>heard the vague acronym CBDC, but don't know the first

0:18:17.400 --> 0:18:20.080
<v Speaker 2>thing about what it actually means, but they pretend like

0:18:20.119 --> 0:18:21.879
<v Speaker 2>they do. Donald Trump was the opposite of that. He

0:18:21.920 --> 0:18:23.719
<v Speaker 2>actually said, what the heck is that? Tell me what

0:18:23.720 --> 0:18:25.399
<v Speaker 2>it is? And then he asked me what are the

0:18:25.400 --> 0:18:28.240
<v Speaker 2>best arguments for why they're actually supporting it? And I

0:18:28.240 --> 0:18:29.760
<v Speaker 2>thought that was a mark of a good leader who

0:18:29.800 --> 0:18:32.400
<v Speaker 2>wanted to understand the best arguments for the other side.

0:18:32.760 --> 0:18:35.040
<v Speaker 2>And later on he said it from the campaign stage

0:18:35.040 --> 0:18:37.440
<v Speaker 2>and an event, so I feel comfortable sharing this part

0:18:37.480 --> 0:18:40.520
<v Speaker 2>of it where he came out then after a thoughtful consideration,

0:18:40.560 --> 0:18:43.480
<v Speaker 2>after careful study of the issue of his opposition to

0:18:43.560 --> 0:18:46.760
<v Speaker 2>a central bank digital currency, and he explained why it's

0:18:46.800 --> 0:18:48.919
<v Speaker 2>the threat to liberty. The flip side of that is

0:18:48.920 --> 0:18:53.200
<v Speaker 2>why you might favor decentralization and alternative options from people

0:18:53.280 --> 0:18:55.760
<v Speaker 2>just staying tethered to the dollar of holding the FED

0:18:55.800 --> 0:19:00.000
<v Speaker 2>accountable by having other options in the marketplace of alternative currency.

0:19:00.600 --> 0:19:02.560
<v Speaker 2>So I think there's been a number of productive conversations

0:19:02.560 --> 0:19:04.359
<v Speaker 2>he and I have had. And one of the things

0:19:04.359 --> 0:19:06.359
<v Speaker 2>that I look at this for is it's not a sector.

0:19:06.359 --> 0:19:09.080
<v Speaker 2>I don't look at cryptocurrency as a sector. To the contrary,

0:19:09.080 --> 0:19:11.639
<v Speaker 2>I look at the first principles of the United States

0:19:11.640 --> 0:19:15.560
<v Speaker 2>of America, founded on competition and choice and financial freedom,

0:19:15.960 --> 0:19:18.320
<v Speaker 2>and I think those principles are certainly what motivated my

0:19:18.400 --> 0:19:20.479
<v Speaker 2>interest in these issues in the campaign, and I think

0:19:20.520 --> 0:19:22.560
<v Speaker 2>that's what's also helped a lot of my conversation with

0:19:22.560 --> 0:19:25.240
<v Speaker 2>the President Trump is let's start with first principles of

0:19:25.240 --> 0:19:27.760
<v Speaker 2>what's right for America, not what's good for one sector

0:19:27.840 --> 0:19:30.520
<v Speaker 2>or another. But then let's adopt the kinds of policies

0:19:30.520 --> 0:19:33.840
<v Speaker 2>that actually allow America to remain the beachhead of innovation

0:19:34.000 --> 0:19:35.159
<v Speaker 2>rather than playing from behind.

0:19:35.280 --> 0:19:39.080
<v Speaker 3>Mister Rameswami, just one item on the idea, the president

0:19:39.200 --> 0:19:43.639
<v Speaker 3>has to block anything or anyone from doing CBDC. I

0:19:43.640 --> 0:19:46.640
<v Speaker 3>think the FED is said clearly many times that it's

0:19:46.680 --> 0:19:50.560
<v Speaker 3>not going to introduce one unless mandated by Congress. Now

0:19:50.640 --> 0:19:53.240
<v Speaker 3>that that's the Fed's position on that, I want a

0:19:53.240 --> 0:19:53.960
<v Speaker 3>little about.

0:19:54.160 --> 0:19:56.960
<v Speaker 2>And just since we're closing the loop on that, Jennet

0:19:57.040 --> 0:20:00.400
<v Speaker 2>Yellen has certainly stood for her advocacy and Executive Raffan

0:20:00.440 --> 0:20:02.840
<v Speaker 2>sponsors legislation that goes through Congress. That's other things work

0:20:02.840 --> 0:20:05.040
<v Speaker 2>in Washington, DC. But I do think it's good to

0:20:05.040 --> 0:20:06.920
<v Speaker 2>have a president, one way or another that's clear about

0:20:06.960 --> 0:20:08.920
<v Speaker 2>his position, and I think that Donald Trump adopted the

0:20:08.960 --> 0:20:10.520
<v Speaker 2>right position in his clarity.

0:20:12.440 --> 0:20:14.320
<v Speaker 3>I would like to talk about artificial intelligence, and I

0:20:14.400 --> 0:20:17.560
<v Speaker 3>appreciate that this was not a question posed last night,

0:20:18.200 --> 0:20:20.920
<v Speaker 3>but any of the policy questions posed weren't really answered

0:20:20.960 --> 0:20:25.320
<v Speaker 3>by either participant. But when former President Trump was in office,

0:20:25.880 --> 0:20:29.960
<v Speaker 3>we weren't talking about the idea of an existential threat

0:20:30.640 --> 0:20:33.199
<v Speaker 3>from a large language model in the many hundreds of

0:20:33.200 --> 0:20:36.159
<v Speaker 3>billions of parameters. We weren't talking about the need to

0:20:36.200 --> 0:20:42.120
<v Speaker 3>regulate AI. So former President Trump doesn't have the experience

0:20:42.200 --> 0:20:44.639
<v Speaker 3>of that. But do you think that he has the

0:20:44.720 --> 0:20:48.360
<v Speaker 3>sort of academic study enough or he's thought about it,

0:20:48.760 --> 0:20:51.240
<v Speaker 3>because going into office, if he were to regain the

0:20:51.240 --> 0:20:54.760
<v Speaker 3>White House would be an issue to consider.

0:20:54.840 --> 0:20:57.840
<v Speaker 2>I do wish this had been a topic both at

0:20:57.840 --> 0:21:00.320
<v Speaker 2>that debate and even in the Republican primary debates. Where

0:21:00.359 --> 0:21:02.840
<v Speaker 2>this issue did not come up once as well, even

0:21:02.880 --> 0:21:05.240
<v Speaker 2>though I suggested it many times. It's an important issue

0:21:05.359 --> 0:21:08.200
<v Speaker 2>for the future, and it falls outside of traditional partisan boundaries,

0:21:08.480 --> 0:21:10.840
<v Speaker 2>So I'm glad you're bringing it up. Is President Trump

0:21:10.840 --> 0:21:12.920
<v Speaker 2>going to claim to be a domain expert in AI

0:21:13.040 --> 0:21:14.680
<v Speaker 2>or something that he's not a domain expert in? Knowing

0:21:14.680 --> 0:21:16.360
<v Speaker 2>that's what I love about him, But I think he's

0:21:16.400 --> 0:21:18.800
<v Speaker 2>going to be able to attrack the best minds around

0:21:18.880 --> 0:21:22.200
<v Speaker 2>him to set rational policy that at once allows the

0:21:22.320 --> 0:21:24.879
<v Speaker 2>US to be a leader in innovation while at the

0:21:24.880 --> 0:21:28.240
<v Speaker 2>same time acknowledging a different kind of risk than we've

0:21:28.280 --> 0:21:31.879
<v Speaker 2>faced in the past from different types of generative AI. Personally,

0:21:31.880 --> 0:21:33.240
<v Speaker 2>one of the things that I think makes a lot

0:21:33.240 --> 0:21:36.000
<v Speaker 2>of sense as a first step rather than creating some

0:21:36.040 --> 0:21:39.359
<v Speaker 2>sort of central government bureaucracy to handle this, is just

0:21:39.400 --> 0:21:41.560
<v Speaker 2>treat it the same way you treat other sectors. Just

0:21:41.600 --> 0:21:44.080
<v Speaker 2>in the same way that you're a chemicals manufacturer and

0:21:44.119 --> 0:21:46.600
<v Speaker 2>you can't dump in somebody else's river. If you're the

0:21:46.600 --> 0:21:50.040
<v Speaker 2>developer of a protocol or an algorithm that has unpredictable

0:21:50.080 --> 0:21:54.520
<v Speaker 2>but nonetheless realized negative effects, that you're liable for those effects.

0:21:54.880 --> 0:21:57.560
<v Speaker 2>Basic principles of the law that we already use elsewhere,

0:21:57.840 --> 0:22:00.679
<v Speaker 2>but to use them in this new domain. Well, and

0:22:00.720 --> 0:22:02.720
<v Speaker 2>what I have seen from President Trump, it's the same

0:22:02.960 --> 0:22:05.040
<v Speaker 2>question that came up even in the last topic we discussed.

0:22:05.119 --> 0:22:08.560
<v Speaker 2>Is a level of intellectual curiosity somebody who has been

0:22:08.600 --> 0:22:11.800
<v Speaker 2>an executive, somebody who, unlike Joe Biden frankly, from seeing

0:22:11.840 --> 0:22:14.520
<v Speaker 2>what we saw last night, is still intellectually with it

0:22:14.760 --> 0:22:16.840
<v Speaker 2>enough to be able to go deep on the details,

0:22:17.119 --> 0:22:20.600
<v Speaker 2>attract the best people, and make the rational policy decision.

0:22:20.640 --> 0:22:23.199
<v Speaker 2>Not in an ideological or ideologue driven manner when it

0:22:23.200 --> 0:22:25.399
<v Speaker 2>comes to AI, but in a manner that is driven

0:22:25.440 --> 0:22:27.520
<v Speaker 2>by our actual understanding of the facts. And so I

0:22:27.520 --> 0:22:29.600
<v Speaker 2>do have confidence in his ability to lead here.

0:22:29.600 --> 0:22:32.000
<v Speaker 3>Mister Ramaswami, I'm sorry instructs you a shorter time, and

0:22:32.000 --> 0:22:34.000
<v Speaker 3>I want to make the most of it. Have you

0:22:34.080 --> 0:22:38.920
<v Speaker 3>been asked to submit documentation for vetting for a potential

0:22:38.920 --> 0:22:41.840
<v Speaker 3>cabinet position in the event of a Trump White House.

0:22:42.760 --> 0:22:44.920
<v Speaker 2>We've got a lot of conversations about the future. I've

0:22:44.920 --> 0:22:47.320
<v Speaker 2>not been asked to be the vice president, but whatever

0:22:47.359 --> 0:22:49.600
<v Speaker 2>it is, I'm going to look at what maximizes the

0:22:49.640 --> 0:22:51.439
<v Speaker 2>impact on the country and how we make sure that

0:22:51.480 --> 0:22:54.200
<v Speaker 2>second Trump term is as good as it possibly can be,

0:22:54.720 --> 0:22:56.439
<v Speaker 2>and I am hopeful that we're going to see the

0:22:56.520 --> 0:22:59.320
<v Speaker 2>strongest ticket not just of the century, but of my lifetime.

0:23:00.040 --> 0:23:02.240
<v Speaker 2>I think after last night, we have a unique opportunity

0:23:02.280 --> 0:23:04.439
<v Speaker 2>in this country for this not to just be a

0:23:04.640 --> 0:23:07.600
<v Speaker 2>fifty point one election. We've had a lot of thin margin,

0:23:07.920 --> 0:23:11.840
<v Speaker 2>thin ice elections. This could be a Reagan nineteen eighty

0:23:11.960 --> 0:23:17.439
<v Speaker 2>nineteen eighty four style landslide, remixing minorities, Hispanics, Blacks, young people,

0:23:17.760 --> 0:23:21.080
<v Speaker 2>creating a new coalition in this country that's pro American

0:23:21.160 --> 0:23:24.320
<v Speaker 2>and goes beyond the boundaries of the traditional Republican Party,

0:23:24.880 --> 0:23:27.480
<v Speaker 2>whilst from those America First principles that Trump ran on.

0:23:27.560 --> 0:23:30.080
<v Speaker 3>So that's what I'm rooting for. I appreciate that answer.

0:23:30.720 --> 0:23:32.440
<v Speaker 3>I am out of time, but I need to ask

0:23:32.480 --> 0:23:36.160
<v Speaker 3>you about BuzzFeed, but also the idea I'm being told

0:23:36.200 --> 0:23:39.240
<v Speaker 3>over and over your interests in a media company something

0:23:39.359 --> 0:23:42.040
<v Speaker 3>like a vice. You know you've been buying up BuzzFeed shares.

0:23:42.320 --> 0:23:46.040
<v Speaker 3>It's reported your statement, what happens? What are you aiming

0:23:46.080 --> 0:23:46.600
<v Speaker 3>to do here?

0:23:47.640 --> 0:23:49.800
<v Speaker 2>Well, look, I'm now the second largest class A shareholder

0:23:49.800 --> 0:23:52.240
<v Speaker 2>at BuzzFeed. I've been very public in my letter that

0:23:52.320 --> 0:23:55.040
<v Speaker 2>this is a company that has struggled and failed for

0:23:55.119 --> 0:23:57.480
<v Speaker 2>reasons that I still think are fixable. A lot of

0:23:57.480 --> 0:23:59.159
<v Speaker 2>people know what BuzzFeed is. They don't know what the

0:23:59.400 --> 0:24:01.760
<v Speaker 2>what the brand is actually stands for. And I think

0:24:01.800 --> 0:24:04.119
<v Speaker 2>they have a historic opportunity to do what many in

0:24:04.160 --> 0:24:06.480
<v Speaker 2>the mainstream media have an opportunity to do, build a

0:24:06.480 --> 0:24:09.400
<v Speaker 2>brand centered on trust and the pursuit of truth by

0:24:09.400 --> 0:24:12.600
<v Speaker 2>saying that you know what, we platform all voices left right,

0:24:12.760 --> 0:24:15.960
<v Speaker 2>doesn't matter across the cultural spectrum, and use that to

0:24:16.080 --> 0:24:20.159
<v Speaker 2>define a coherent and powerful brand that I think audiences

0:24:20.200 --> 0:24:23.159
<v Speaker 2>are hungry for, especially of younger audiences today that are

0:24:23.160 --> 0:24:26.760
<v Speaker 2>sick and tired of yesterday's legacy media, but want authenticity,

0:24:26.800 --> 0:24:29.320
<v Speaker 2>want to trust content creators. So I've given in the

0:24:29.480 --> 0:24:31.600
<v Speaker 2>context of the letter that I sent to their board,

0:24:31.600 --> 0:24:34.359
<v Speaker 2>I've also proposed three directors mister Ramsa joined the board,

0:24:34.520 --> 0:24:37.000
<v Speaker 2>a direction strategy that I hope will create the value

0:24:37.320 --> 0:24:38.359
<v Speaker 2>of a company.

0:24:37.960 --> 0:24:41.639
<v Speaker 6>That sadly has performed a Ramaswam me. I'm sorry to

0:24:41.640 --> 0:24:43.680
<v Speaker 6>cut you off. We are out of time that Ramaswami,

0:24:43.720 --> 0:24:44.840
<v Speaker 6>thank you. This is Bloomberg.

0:24:54.240 --> 0:24:57.679
<v Speaker 3>Welcome back to Bloomberg's Technology at Ludlow in San Francisco.

0:24:58.000 --> 0:24:59.760
<v Speaker 3>I want to check in on Apple, Chaz. It's an

0:25:00.040 --> 0:25:03.000
<v Speaker 3>resting position. Apple finds itself in up for a fifth

0:25:03.000 --> 0:25:07.119
<v Speaker 3>straight day, kind of recovering under the radar. It's a

0:25:07.200 --> 0:25:09.240
<v Speaker 3>name that we've had a lot of concern about with

0:25:09.320 --> 0:25:12.920
<v Speaker 3>regards to valuation. We've been debating about whether the AI

0:25:13.080 --> 0:25:17.480
<v Speaker 3>strategy with Apple is understood by investors, if they've given

0:25:17.560 --> 0:25:20.719
<v Speaker 3>the stock too much credit about AI or too little.

0:25:21.200 --> 0:25:24.159
<v Speaker 3>But really what's driving trading is data round in China

0:25:24.480 --> 0:25:28.000
<v Speaker 3>that shows shipment's up forty in the month of May,

0:25:28.320 --> 0:25:32.440
<v Speaker 3>a continuing short term recovery after a really tough first

0:25:32.520 --> 0:25:35.760
<v Speaker 3>three months of this year where sales weren't great and

0:25:36.280 --> 0:25:39.480
<v Speaker 3>domestic handset makers were taking market share. Then we entered

0:25:39.480 --> 0:25:41.360
<v Speaker 3>this period of the year in China, which is such

0:25:41.359 --> 0:25:45.080
<v Speaker 3>a key market for all electronics providers and makers, where

0:25:45.080 --> 0:25:48.320
<v Speaker 3>they did a lot of discounting, you know, special holiday sales,

0:25:48.359 --> 0:25:51.560
<v Speaker 3>things like that. But the stock interesting over a five

0:25:51.640 --> 0:25:54.320
<v Speaker 3>day basis, I would say that it's the longest streak

0:25:54.400 --> 0:25:56.760
<v Speaker 3>since June eighth, which was the end of an eight

0:25:56.840 --> 0:25:59.720
<v Speaker 3>day winning streak, and it's kind of on the verge

0:25:59.720 --> 0:26:02.280
<v Speaker 3>of re taking the crown of the world's most valuable company,

0:26:02.440 --> 0:26:05.240
<v Speaker 3>which it had lost to Microsoft and briefly to Nvidia.

0:26:05.359 --> 0:26:09.159
<v Speaker 3>Let's bringing blue Miss Mark German the perfect correspondent for this.

0:26:09.600 --> 0:26:12.280
<v Speaker 3>Talk to me about the China data because it's official

0:26:12.400 --> 0:26:14.920
<v Speaker 3>data that we kind of crunch the numbers on and

0:26:15.040 --> 0:26:17.040
<v Speaker 3>I'm trying to extrapolate a story out of it.

0:26:17.480 --> 0:26:18.359
<v Speaker 6>Is this a recovery?

0:26:19.800 --> 0:26:22.560
<v Speaker 8>The story definitely is a recovery. Right in the first

0:26:22.640 --> 0:26:25.600
<v Speaker 8>couple months of twenty twenty four, you saw iPhone shipments

0:26:25.640 --> 0:26:29.679
<v Speaker 8>declined quite significantly in China. But you know, around the springtime,

0:26:29.840 --> 0:26:33.399
<v Speaker 8>some interesting things happen. Apple started offering some promotions on

0:26:33.600 --> 0:26:35.560
<v Speaker 8>some of the higher end iPhone models. Some of the

0:26:35.640 --> 0:26:39.640
<v Speaker 8>resellers and online sales channels for the iPhone started offering discounts.

0:26:39.680 --> 0:26:39.840
<v Speaker 3>There.

0:26:40.600 --> 0:26:44.320
<v Speaker 8>They have several different holidays shopping holidays in China that

0:26:44.520 --> 0:26:47.360
<v Speaker 8>offer discounts not only in the iPhone but several different products.

0:26:47.480 --> 0:26:49.800
<v Speaker 8>And so what you've seen here is in uptick in sales,

0:26:49.880 --> 0:26:52.840
<v Speaker 8>and based on our calculations, based on the data that

0:26:52.920 --> 0:26:57.040
<v Speaker 8>comes officially from China, you sell forty percent growth in

0:26:57.119 --> 0:26:59.960
<v Speaker 8>the last month or so, and so that's quite significant

0:27:00.480 --> 0:27:03.640
<v Speaker 8>for Apple and the smartphone market is growing quite strongly

0:27:04.320 --> 0:27:06.640
<v Speaker 8>in China right now. It's not just Apple, it's Huawei

0:27:06.880 --> 0:27:09.879
<v Speaker 8>some of the other Chinese phonemakers. But China was a

0:27:09.920 --> 0:27:13.720
<v Speaker 8>real concern for investors in Apple earlier this year and

0:27:13.880 --> 0:27:16.440
<v Speaker 8>last year. In with the sales uptick, a lot of

0:27:16.480 --> 0:27:19.919
<v Speaker 8>those concerns are being mitigated. And this is happening at

0:27:19.960 --> 0:27:22.919
<v Speaker 8>a really great time for Apple because the summers are

0:27:23.040 --> 0:27:26.760
<v Speaker 8>usually slow season for iPhone sales, given the anticipation of

0:27:26.880 --> 0:27:29.200
<v Speaker 8>the new models to come in September. So what you're

0:27:29.200 --> 0:27:31.800
<v Speaker 8>seeing right now is a strong uptick in the current

0:27:31.880 --> 0:27:34.680
<v Speaker 8>iPhones in the months leading up to the next iPhones,

0:27:35.119 --> 0:27:38.160
<v Speaker 8>and then you're going to get another big push come

0:27:38.200 --> 0:27:41.760
<v Speaker 8>September October when the new iPhones roll out. So right

0:27:41.840 --> 0:27:45.160
<v Speaker 8>now things in China for Apple in terms of the iPhone,

0:27:45.359 --> 0:27:47.240
<v Speaker 8>they're as good as they've been in several months.

0:27:48.440 --> 0:27:50.040
<v Speaker 3>Mark, Can we talk a little bit about the big

0:27:50.119 --> 0:27:55.399
<v Speaker 3>picture strategy in China. You reported, for example, June twenty first,

0:27:55.640 --> 0:27:59.680
<v Speaker 3>that Apple was halting its AI rollout in Europe because

0:27:59.680 --> 0:28:03.760
<v Speaker 3>it was concerned about the regulatory environment. There By comparison,

0:28:03.880 --> 0:28:05.760
<v Speaker 3>do we have a good sense of what the AI

0:28:05.920 --> 0:28:08.640
<v Speaker 3>roll out will be in China and whether it will

0:28:08.720 --> 0:28:11.040
<v Speaker 3>just mirror what they plan to do in the United States.

0:28:12.320 --> 0:28:15.439
<v Speaker 8>So, as you know, there's three facets to Apple Intelligence.

0:28:15.600 --> 0:28:18.800
<v Speaker 8>There's an on device large language model right for some

0:28:18.920 --> 0:28:23.480
<v Speaker 8>of the more minor tasks like notification prioritization. There's a

0:28:23.560 --> 0:28:27.439
<v Speaker 8>cloud component which is also run through Apple for more

0:28:27.480 --> 0:28:31.359
<v Speaker 8>advanced things like writing tools and summarizing information. And then

0:28:31.400 --> 0:28:34.679
<v Speaker 8>the third part is the chatbot. That's the whizbang feature

0:28:34.800 --> 0:28:37.080
<v Speaker 8>that is going to be most exciting to a lot

0:28:37.160 --> 0:28:39.920
<v Speaker 8>of people. And in the US you get open Ai

0:28:39.960 --> 0:28:42.280
<v Speaker 8>as a partner, but in China you're going to need

0:28:42.440 --> 0:28:45.120
<v Speaker 8>another partner. So they've talked to Alibaba, they've talked to Baidu,

0:28:45.200 --> 0:28:47.120
<v Speaker 8>they've talked to some others, but they don't have an

0:28:47.120 --> 0:28:49.760
<v Speaker 8>agreement in place there. And until they're able to get

0:28:49.800 --> 0:28:53.040
<v Speaker 8>an agreement for that third party chatpot integration, they're not

0:28:53.120 --> 0:28:55.200
<v Speaker 8>really going to be able to roll out Apple Intelligence

0:28:55.240 --> 0:28:57.880
<v Speaker 8>in a meaningful way. I would expect that to come

0:28:57.960 --> 0:29:00.640
<v Speaker 8>together sometime by the middle of next Europe.

0:29:01.680 --> 0:29:04.080
<v Speaker 3>Just point out that in the duration of Mark's report

0:29:04.160 --> 0:29:06.400
<v Speaker 3>here with us on bluebo Technology, Apples actually raised its

0:29:06.440 --> 0:29:08.920
<v Speaker 3>Friday game in this flat But as we showed is

0:29:09.040 --> 0:29:10.880
<v Speaker 3>up on the week, Bloom Moost Mark German Goods, catch

0:29:10.960 --> 0:29:22.160
<v Speaker 3>up Happy Friday. In benched capital news, the firm Kleiner

0:29:22.200 --> 0:29:25.800
<v Speaker 3>Perkins announced today that they have raised more than two billion.

0:29:25.480 --> 0:29:26.760
<v Speaker 6>Dollars for two new funds.

0:29:27.120 --> 0:29:29.720
<v Speaker 3>The first eight hundred and twenty five million dollar funds

0:29:29.920 --> 0:29:33.280
<v Speaker 3>will target young startups and another one point two billion

0:29:33.360 --> 0:29:37.040
<v Speaker 3>dollar will be allocated towards a later stage fund. Klinda

0:29:37.080 --> 0:29:41.400
<v Speaker 3>Perkins will look for startups that are leveraging AI for growth.

0:29:42.280 --> 0:29:43.720
<v Speaker 3>Now for a look at the state of the tech

0:29:43.880 --> 0:29:46.040
<v Speaker 3>M and A market, Ali Love, partner of M and

0:29:46.120 --> 0:29:49.480
<v Speaker 3>A and technology at Deba, Vois and Plimpton, joins us

0:29:49.560 --> 0:29:53.560
<v Speaker 3>for more. It's been an interesting few weeks actually in

0:29:53.600 --> 0:29:56.160
<v Speaker 3>the world of M and A, particularly when I speak

0:29:56.160 --> 0:30:00.160
<v Speaker 3>to bench capitalists, they might actually be more upbeat that

0:30:00.320 --> 0:30:03.600
<v Speaker 3>some of their latest stage venture back companies are more

0:30:03.760 --> 0:30:07.160
<v Speaker 3>likely to be acquired than go public. That there's kind

0:30:07.160 --> 0:30:11.120
<v Speaker 3>of some energy there is that something that you see

0:30:11.160 --> 0:30:12.280
<v Speaker 3>from your desk as well.

0:30:12.880 --> 0:30:14.840
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, I think that's exactly right. I think that there's

0:30:14.840 --> 0:30:17.560
<v Speaker 9>a lot of optimism in the market right now. If

0:30:17.600 --> 0:30:20.720
<v Speaker 9>you look at the last you know, three to four years,

0:30:20.760 --> 0:30:22.960
<v Speaker 9>you obviously had a massive uptick in twenty one and

0:30:23.040 --> 0:30:27.240
<v Speaker 9>twenty two, and that dropped off precipitously, with valuations dropping

0:30:27.400 --> 0:30:30.240
<v Speaker 9>in twenty two, end of twenty two, all of twenty

0:30:30.280 --> 0:30:32.640
<v Speaker 9>twenty three, and to some extent to the beginning of

0:30:32.680 --> 0:30:35.680
<v Speaker 9>this year. And we have you know, probably three major

0:30:35.960 --> 0:30:39.959
<v Speaker 9>groups of acquirers that will acquire venture back technology companies.

0:30:40.040 --> 0:30:43.640
<v Speaker 9>You have private equity, traditional tech acquirers, and what I

0:30:43.760 --> 0:30:46.440
<v Speaker 9>like to refer to as non traditional tech acquirers. Those

0:30:46.480 --> 0:30:50.840
<v Speaker 9>are older industries, you know, looking at private equity. Obviously,

0:30:50.960 --> 0:30:53.320
<v Speaker 9>the rise and interest rates made them nervous, but if

0:30:53.360 --> 0:30:56.120
<v Speaker 9>you go back in history, private equity is very used

0:30:56.160 --> 0:30:58.960
<v Speaker 9>to operating at double digit interest rates. So have they

0:30:59.040 --> 0:31:01.640
<v Speaker 9>dusted off their old place books reminded themselves how do

0:31:01.720 --> 0:31:04.880
<v Speaker 9>we do this again? Absolutely, and they've become increasingly active

0:31:04.880 --> 0:31:07.120
<v Speaker 9>in the first two quarters of this year. Going to

0:31:07.520 --> 0:31:10.160
<v Speaker 9>traditional tech acquirers. A lot of them sat out the

0:31:10.200 --> 0:31:12.640
<v Speaker 9>first couple of years of the boom. They didn't want

0:31:12.680 --> 0:31:14.640
<v Speaker 9>to spend cash at that level. They didn't want to

0:31:15.000 --> 0:31:20.880
<v Speaker 9>you know, uh, you know use that I mean, sorry,

0:31:20.880 --> 0:31:21.520
<v Speaker 9>go ahead.

0:31:21.840 --> 0:31:22.560
<v Speaker 6>No, no, I'm sorry.

0:31:22.560 --> 0:31:25.560
<v Speaker 3>I just wanted to jump in and ask about you know,

0:31:26.160 --> 0:31:29.720
<v Speaker 3>there's the mechanics of it using cash. I particularly understand

0:31:29.760 --> 0:31:33.040
<v Speaker 3>the private equity side of that equation. There's also like

0:31:33.080 --> 0:31:36.560
<v Speaker 3>a little bit of a psychological side of any transaction.

0:31:36.840 --> 0:31:39.160
<v Speaker 3>What's interesting about your firm is you're you're on both

0:31:39.160 --> 0:31:42.680
<v Speaker 3>sides of the table, right, buyer and seller. What are

0:31:42.760 --> 0:31:46.120
<v Speaker 3>attitudes right now to sitting down and hashing out a deal?

0:31:46.960 --> 0:31:48.160
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, I mean, I think one of the things that

0:31:48.240 --> 0:31:50.280
<v Speaker 9>we work with our clients right now a lot on

0:31:50.720 --> 0:31:54.600
<v Speaker 9>is both for traditional non tra traditional tech acquirers, understanding

0:31:54.640 --> 0:31:57.640
<v Speaker 9>the mindset of founders and of boards. You know, in

0:31:57.720 --> 0:32:00.640
<v Speaker 9>a lot of instances, these are companies that were two

0:32:00.680 --> 0:32:03.480
<v Speaker 9>individuals in a garage. They've grown their companies to multi

0:32:03.520 --> 0:32:06.520
<v Speaker 9>billion dollar companies, but along the way, they've underpaid themselves.

0:32:06.560 --> 0:32:08.920
<v Speaker 9>They haven't bought houses, they haven't gotten married, they haven't

0:32:08.960 --> 0:32:11.680
<v Speaker 9>had children, you know, they haven't gone on vacation. And

0:32:11.840 --> 0:32:14.640
<v Speaker 9>any buyer that loses sight of that isn't understanding the

0:32:14.720 --> 0:32:15.600
<v Speaker 9>company that they're buying.

0:32:16.640 --> 0:32:19.000
<v Speaker 3>So something really interesting is happening in what I would

0:32:19.040 --> 0:32:22.240
<v Speaker 3>call non tech companies as well. Right This idea that

0:32:23.240 --> 0:32:25.840
<v Speaker 3>in a world of AI. For examples, we just discussed

0:32:25.880 --> 0:32:28.560
<v Speaker 3>that new kind of Perkins fund you've got to have

0:32:28.760 --> 0:32:31.400
<v Speaker 3>some sort of AI tool or your investor base or

0:32:31.440 --> 0:32:34.480
<v Speaker 3>your employees won't believe you and they'll leave. And I

0:32:34.560 --> 0:32:36.840
<v Speaker 3>see that happening in all kinds of sectors, you know,

0:32:36.960 --> 0:32:41.000
<v Speaker 3>oil and gas, utilities, even construction saying uh oh, we

0:32:41.120 --> 0:32:42.360
<v Speaker 3>better buy a solution here.

0:32:42.840 --> 0:32:44.600
<v Speaker 6>That must be a boon for business to you.

0:32:45.480 --> 0:32:47.920
<v Speaker 9>That's exactly right. And you really have two separate things

0:32:48.000 --> 0:32:51.440
<v Speaker 9>going on here. So first, speaking specifically to AI, I

0:32:51.520 --> 0:32:54.560
<v Speaker 9>think it's a mischaracterization to say that there's a lot

0:32:54.640 --> 0:32:57.560
<v Speaker 9>of AI M and A activity. There aren't enough AI

0:32:57.720 --> 0:33:00.640
<v Speaker 9>platform companies for there to be consolidation. Now, there are

0:33:00.680 --> 0:33:03.920
<v Speaker 9>a lot of companies that do something else. They do cybersecurity.

0:33:04.000 --> 0:33:06.640
<v Speaker 9>Maybe they are an HR platform, maybe it's a fintech company,

0:33:06.920 --> 0:33:08.880
<v Speaker 9>you know, are they adding AI to what they do

0:33:09.120 --> 0:33:12.320
<v Speaker 9>to improve their products? Absolutely, those products are getting smarter,

0:33:12.360 --> 0:33:15.240
<v Speaker 9>they're going faster, they're more attractive to their customer base.

0:33:15.600 --> 0:33:19.120
<v Speaker 9>But those aren't fundamental AI platforms, you know. On the

0:33:19.480 --> 0:33:22.040
<v Speaker 9>flip side, the other thing that we're seeing is a

0:33:22.120 --> 0:33:24.840
<v Speaker 9>lot of as you said, some non traditional tech acquirers

0:33:24.960 --> 0:33:27.920
<v Speaker 9>come deeper into the tech space. Another area where they're

0:33:27.920 --> 0:33:30.280
<v Speaker 9>doing that is cybersecurity. If you go back to the

0:33:30.320 --> 0:33:32.680
<v Speaker 9>beginning of the pandemic, everybody may remember they were say,

0:33:32.760 --> 0:33:36.400
<v Speaker 9>massive pipeline hack on the Eastern seaboard that woke up

0:33:36.440 --> 0:33:38.160
<v Speaker 9>a lot of the oil and gas companies to say,

0:33:38.200 --> 0:33:41.560
<v Speaker 9>we've not invested enough in technology, We've not invested enough

0:33:41.640 --> 0:33:45.200
<v Speaker 9>in cybersecurity, in protecting these infrastructure projects. And so a

0:33:45.280 --> 0:33:49.160
<v Speaker 9>lot of companies in theory could build those solutions, those

0:33:49.160 --> 0:33:52.560
<v Speaker 9>cybersecurity solutions, but some older industries are not equipped to

0:33:52.640 --> 0:33:52.840
<v Speaker 9>do that.

0:33:52.960 --> 0:33:53.520
<v Speaker 6>So what do they do.

0:33:53.800 --> 0:33:55.720
<v Speaker 9>They go out and buy them wholesale. They buy a

0:33:55.800 --> 0:33:58.560
<v Speaker 9>company to create a product just for them. And so

0:33:58.720 --> 0:34:01.120
<v Speaker 9>that's what a lot of some of these older industries.

0:34:01.160 --> 0:34:03.200
<v Speaker 9>It could be oil and gas, it could be agriculture.

0:34:03.440 --> 0:34:05.760
<v Speaker 9>You know, to some extent, even banking is still behind

0:34:05.760 --> 0:34:07.959
<v Speaker 9>the ball for some of these technologies.

0:34:08.560 --> 0:34:11.240
<v Speaker 3>Ali, what you just said on consolidation was really interesting.

0:34:11.280 --> 0:34:14.680
<v Speaker 3>It almost contradicts kind of what we'd been hearing. What

0:34:14.760 --> 0:34:17.720
<v Speaker 3>I wrote about a few weeks ago, which was based

0:34:17.800 --> 0:34:21.640
<v Speaker 3>on comments from hugging face that you know, hugging face

0:34:21.719 --> 0:34:24.719
<v Speaker 3>is a platform that hosts loads of large language model providers,

0:34:25.239 --> 0:34:27.640
<v Speaker 3>and the smaller players needed help.

0:34:27.680 --> 0:34:29.960
<v Speaker 6>They've run out of cash. It's an expensive enterprise.

0:34:30.600 --> 0:34:32.879
<v Speaker 3>You seem to be saying that actually at the platform level,

0:34:33.320 --> 0:34:37.960
<v Speaker 3>that isn't happening because there aren't enough platform level providers

0:34:38.040 --> 0:34:38.399
<v Speaker 3>right now.

0:34:38.760 --> 0:34:40.000
<v Speaker 6>Just give me a bit more on that.

0:34:40.440 --> 0:34:42.320
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, So to be clear, there is a ton of

0:34:42.440 --> 0:34:46.279
<v Speaker 9>investment going into AI and AI platform companies one hundred percent,

0:34:46.360 --> 0:34:48.240
<v Speaker 9>and I think you see that with the Kleiner Perkins

0:34:48.280 --> 0:34:50.760
<v Speaker 9>fund that was just announce But what you're not seeing

0:34:51.000 --> 0:34:53.600
<v Speaker 9>is the exits. There aren't enough of those companies for

0:34:53.719 --> 0:34:57.040
<v Speaker 9>there to be consolidation. Yes, absolutely there are some, but

0:34:57.239 --> 0:34:59.799
<v Speaker 9>not to the volume that you see in other subsectors of.

0:35:02.040 --> 0:35:04.360
<v Speaker 3>Alie love from Deba Boys and Plimpton. It's great to

0:35:04.400 --> 0:35:06.000
<v Speaker 3>have you on the program. From the M and A

0:35:06.120 --> 0:35:07.080
<v Speaker 3>side appreciate it.

0:35:07.239 --> 0:35:07.520
<v Speaker 6>Thank you.

0:35:08.000 --> 0:35:10.480
<v Speaker 3>Let's zero in on the field of climate tech and

0:35:10.600 --> 0:35:14.000
<v Speaker 3>how AI can help and bring in Juan Maldoon, a

0:35:14.080 --> 0:35:17.319
<v Speaker 3>partner in co Head Adventures. It energized capital. The firm

0:35:17.360 --> 0:35:20.880
<v Speaker 3>focuses on climate solutions one point four billion dollars of

0:35:21.000 --> 0:35:23.600
<v Speaker 3>capital to play with. Let's actually just thought with what

0:35:23.719 --> 0:35:26.400
<v Speaker 3>Ali was talking about. From the M and A perspective,

0:35:27.000 --> 0:35:30.280
<v Speaker 3>I have had sort of thematically specialized.

0:35:29.640 --> 0:35:31.399
<v Speaker 6>Vcs come on the show.

0:35:31.440 --> 0:35:34.280
<v Speaker 3>In recent weeks and months and say, pretty good outlet

0:35:34.360 --> 0:35:39.160
<v Speaker 3>for us because they either provide a very clear technology

0:35:39.200 --> 0:35:42.040
<v Speaker 3>platform to a bigger beast in the energy field, for example.

0:35:42.080 --> 0:35:43.400
<v Speaker 6>What did you make of her comments?

0:35:44.560 --> 0:35:45.640
<v Speaker 2>I sort of agree.

0:35:45.719 --> 0:35:47.360
<v Speaker 10>So I actually think that we're seeing a lot of

0:35:47.480 --> 0:35:52.560
<v Speaker 10>growing interest from traditional industrial companies that are looking for digital.

0:35:52.239 --> 0:35:53.799
<v Speaker 2>Technologies and pockets of growth.

0:35:54.120 --> 0:35:57.240
<v Speaker 10>And frankly, in our space, the software meets climate intersection

0:35:57.440 --> 0:36:00.360
<v Speaker 10>brings both. It brings digital technologies and it brings the

0:36:00.480 --> 0:36:03.200
<v Speaker 10>growth pockets that a lot of these traditional buyers are bringing.

0:36:03.520 --> 0:36:06.800
<v Speaker 10>I think this interest isn't exclusive to AI companies or

0:36:06.840 --> 0:36:09.200
<v Speaker 10>maybe even catalyzed, because I do agree that a lot

0:36:09.239 --> 0:36:12.280
<v Speaker 10>of the AI specific companies are still early in their journey,

0:36:12.600 --> 0:36:16.520
<v Speaker 10>but there's no doubt tech driven growth that is attractive,

0:36:16.520 --> 0:36:18.759
<v Speaker 10>and I think the companies are looking for products so

0:36:18.880 --> 0:36:22.280
<v Speaker 10>they can build outo their platforms and talent next generation

0:36:22.400 --> 0:36:25.080
<v Speaker 10>that's going to help them pull forward to where the

0:36:25.120 --> 0:36:26.239
<v Speaker 10>transition is actually going.

0:36:27.160 --> 0:36:29.320
<v Speaker 3>And I think it's a surprise or audience that we

0:36:29.520 --> 0:36:34.120
<v Speaker 3>have a bench caps they specializing in energy or climate

0:36:34.200 --> 0:36:38.480
<v Speaker 3>tech talking about AI, but weed to understand how much

0:36:38.520 --> 0:36:40.040
<v Speaker 3>of it is hype and how much is it if

0:36:40.080 --> 0:36:42.680
<v Speaker 3>it's sort of having an actual impact, right, I was

0:36:42.719 --> 0:36:45.200
<v Speaker 3>a battery and EV reporter for a really long time.

0:36:45.760 --> 0:36:49.760
<v Speaker 3>Loads of examples where software makes a really fundamental difference.

0:36:50.200 --> 0:36:52.600
<v Speaker 3>So to take that, give me case studies of where

0:36:52.640 --> 0:36:56.759
<v Speaker 3>you're seeing AI impact your foot portfolio, companies, or the

0:36:56.840 --> 0:36:57.800
<v Speaker 3>industry at large.

0:36:58.840 --> 0:36:59.040
<v Speaker 6>Yeah.

0:36:59.200 --> 0:37:01.799
<v Speaker 10>No, absolutely, and actually think that AI is already having

0:37:01.840 --> 0:37:04.440
<v Speaker 10>a big impact in our space in two primary ways.

0:37:04.960 --> 0:37:07.840
<v Speaker 10>On the one hand, it's actually very computationally intensive, and

0:37:07.920 --> 0:37:10.920
<v Speaker 10>it demands huge amounts of power, which is electricity to

0:37:11.000 --> 0:37:13.000
<v Speaker 10>actually give rise to that compute.

0:37:13.080 --> 0:37:14.719
<v Speaker 6>And this is a huge.

0:37:14.600 --> 0:37:17.200
<v Speaker 10>Surge in the powerload in our world, and it's pointing

0:37:17.280 --> 0:37:19.960
<v Speaker 10>to stress in our grid. So energy consumption is expected

0:37:20.000 --> 0:37:22.720
<v Speaker 10>to grow seven to ten percent year on year compared

0:37:22.760 --> 0:37:25.200
<v Speaker 10>to usually two to three percent year on year over

0:37:25.200 --> 0:37:29.440
<v Speaker 10>the next several years. So that's a huge draw for

0:37:29.960 --> 0:37:33.480
<v Speaker 10>power and it's a huge draw for potential AI applications.

0:37:33.560 --> 0:37:36.120
<v Speaker 10>The second is that AI is actually enabling a wide

0:37:36.160 --> 0:37:39.040
<v Speaker 10>set of opportunities to accelerate the energy transition, Like you

0:37:39.120 --> 0:37:42.439
<v Speaker 10>were talking about workflow automation that can help reduce soft

0:37:42.520 --> 0:37:45.880
<v Speaker 10>costs or generative tools that can help improve the development

0:37:46.080 --> 0:37:50.360
<v Speaker 10>or the deployment of renewable projects. So, for example, batteries

0:37:50.440 --> 0:37:53.239
<v Speaker 10>you mentioned, we have a company in our portfolio called

0:37:53.320 --> 0:37:56.359
<v Speaker 10>Twice that can actually use AI engines to calibrate how

0:37:56.480 --> 0:37:59.919
<v Speaker 10>batteries will age and degrade over time, so we could

0:38:00.200 --> 0:38:05.280
<v Speaker 10>better predict battery behavior, better predict performance, better predict detailed

0:38:05.320 --> 0:38:09.080
<v Speaker 10>insights into the state of charge and capacity, so to

0:38:09.120 --> 0:38:11.359
<v Speaker 10>make sure that we can actually use those resources more

0:38:11.440 --> 0:38:13.440
<v Speaker 10>effectively and more appropriately at scale.

0:38:15.480 --> 0:38:17.480
<v Speaker 3>And I'm sure you will have watched the presidential debate

0:38:17.600 --> 0:38:22.120
<v Speaker 3>last night. Infrastructure has been at the heart of President

0:38:22.200 --> 0:38:28.640
<v Speaker 3>Biden's policy platform for the last three and a half years.

0:38:30.200 --> 0:38:33.719
<v Speaker 3>How has that manifested in the real world for you

0:38:33.960 --> 0:38:35.320
<v Speaker 3>in the areas that you invest in?

0:38:36.840 --> 0:38:40.120
<v Speaker 10>The infrastructure The Inflation Reduction Act, which is really an

0:38:40.160 --> 0:38:43.000
<v Speaker 10>infrastructure bill, has pulled the future forward in a lot

0:38:43.040 --> 0:38:45.799
<v Speaker 10>of different ways. But at Energize, we don't really see

0:38:45.800 --> 0:38:48.960
<v Speaker 10>a shift in political power as a particular threat to

0:38:49.000 --> 0:38:51.920
<v Speaker 10>the energy transition. We see that that train is underway

0:38:52.440 --> 0:38:55.320
<v Speaker 10>and the companies that we're investing are accelerating that. So

0:38:55.520 --> 0:38:57.480
<v Speaker 10>it might change a little bit the pace, but the

0:38:57.600 --> 0:38:59.600
<v Speaker 10>direction is not really changing.

0:38:59.680 --> 0:38:59.880
<v Speaker 2>For me.

0:39:00.320 --> 0:39:03.760
<v Speaker 10>I think it comes down to economics. The renewable transition

0:39:04.000 --> 0:39:07.320
<v Speaker 10>technology that is viable today, wind solar, and batteries that

0:39:07.480 --> 0:39:09.840
<v Speaker 10>come down and costs dramatically over the last ten and

0:39:09.920 --> 0:39:13.480
<v Speaker 10>fifteen years, and that's going to continue. We've invested under

0:39:13.560 --> 0:39:17.200
<v Speaker 10>Republican presidents and under democratic presidents either way. That train

0:39:17.280 --> 0:39:20.440
<v Speaker 10>has really left the station, and we actually think that

0:39:20.520 --> 0:39:23.400
<v Speaker 10>the directional arrow of progress is going to continue to

0:39:23.520 --> 0:39:27.160
<v Speaker 10>follow better products and better economics and really better social

0:39:27.280 --> 0:39:29.160
<v Speaker 10>outcomes around the world.

0:39:30.400 --> 0:39:32.160
<v Speaker 6>You join us from Chicago, Illinois.

0:39:32.200 --> 0:39:34.600
<v Speaker 3>I still think of the Bay Area in Silicon Valley

0:39:34.600 --> 0:39:37.719
<v Speaker 3>as the hotbed of energy or climate related teg.

0:39:37.920 --> 0:39:42.520
<v Speaker 10>Is that the case, there's a lot of innovation outsideide

0:39:42.600 --> 0:39:45.880
<v Speaker 10>of Silicon Valley. For climate, climate is a global opportunity.

0:39:46.000 --> 0:39:48.880
<v Speaker 10>The talent that is tackling the climate challenge is also global.

0:39:48.920 --> 0:39:52.160
<v Speaker 10>We see a lot of innovation in Europe specifically where

0:39:53.640 --> 0:39:57.040
<v Speaker 10>those power dynamics and that energy infrastructure is very very different.

0:39:57.800 --> 0:40:00.200
<v Speaker 10>So actually, no, we see a lot of opportunity to

0:40:00.280 --> 0:40:02.800
<v Speaker 10>invest outside of Silicon Valley, and we actually really like

0:40:02.840 --> 0:40:05.120
<v Speaker 10>to be close to customers and so being in that

0:40:05.320 --> 0:40:09.000
<v Speaker 10>Midwest the heart of industry is important to us.

0:40:11.280 --> 0:40:14.279
<v Speaker 3>Quan Maldoon, partner and co head adventures that energize. Really

0:40:14.280 --> 0:40:16.239
<v Speaker 3>great to have you on the program, and it's an

0:40:16.239 --> 0:40:17.560
<v Speaker 3>area that I've been thinking.

0:40:17.400 --> 0:40:18.880
<v Speaker 6>About a lot of late, so thank you now.

0:40:18.920 --> 0:40:22.880
<v Speaker 3>Coming up, also on topic, a new survey shows Tesla

0:40:23.480 --> 0:40:26.880
<v Speaker 3>no longer stands about the other electric vehicles in quality

0:40:27.239 --> 0:40:31.719
<v Speaker 3>because of some specific head scratching design changes. It's got

0:40:31.719 --> 0:40:34.520
<v Speaker 3>a really interesting discussion coming up. This is bloombog Technology,

0:40:45.520 --> 0:40:46.399
<v Speaker 3>Time for Talking tech.

0:40:46.520 --> 0:40:47.879
<v Speaker 6>Two quick stories in the news.

0:40:48.000 --> 0:40:51.879
<v Speaker 3>Microsoft and open AI's thirteen million dollar partnership is set

0:40:51.960 --> 0:40:55.560
<v Speaker 3>to face scrutiny EU and to trust What watchdogs are

0:40:55.600 --> 0:40:59.760
<v Speaker 3>set to ask rivals and customers about the company's exclusivity clause,

0:40:59.800 --> 0:41:03.800
<v Speaker 3>in which Microsoft's Azure is the sole cloud provider for

0:41:04.040 --> 0:41:07.759
<v Speaker 3>open Ai, but worth noting no formal investigation has been

0:41:07.840 --> 0:41:12.080
<v Speaker 3>opened yet. Plus, rain Ai recruits an Apple exec The

0:41:12.160 --> 0:41:15.440
<v Speaker 3>startup backed by Sam Altman, made its second high profile

0:41:15.520 --> 0:41:19.040
<v Speaker 3>higher this month, employing an Apple chip executive that once

0:41:19.160 --> 0:41:22.200
<v Speaker 3>led hardware engineering. Rain Ai is hoping to design a

0:41:22.320 --> 0:41:26.799
<v Speaker 3>new type of semiconductor, specifically for artificial intelligence.

0:41:27.160 --> 0:41:27.440
<v Speaker 6>Okay.

0:41:27.600 --> 0:41:32.760
<v Speaker 3>According to JD Power's initial quality study, Tesla no longer

0:41:32.840 --> 0:41:36.879
<v Speaker 3>stands above other electric vehicles in quality because of head

0:41:36.960 --> 0:41:41.360
<v Speaker 3>scratching design changes on its cars, such as removing the

0:41:41.480 --> 0:41:44.440
<v Speaker 3>turn signal stalks. I want to bring in my friend

0:41:44.520 --> 0:41:47.040
<v Speaker 3>and colleague bloombergs Keif Norton, who's the.

0:41:47.080 --> 0:41:48.000
<v Speaker 6>Byline on this one.

0:41:48.080 --> 0:41:51.640
<v Speaker 3>I found it so interesting to read because so much

0:41:51.680 --> 0:41:54.919
<v Speaker 3>of the Tesla origin story was that its technology was great.

0:41:55.120 --> 0:41:58.400
<v Speaker 3>It was a great product. But they've made some tweaks

0:41:58.520 --> 0:42:01.080
<v Speaker 3>that on specific models. I think it's Model X and

0:42:01.239 --> 0:42:04.400
<v Speaker 3>S after a certain year and then REFRESHMDEL three that

0:42:04.560 --> 0:42:08.000
<v Speaker 3>actually have not gone them down well with the tesseronas.

0:42:08.400 --> 0:42:09.040
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, that's right.

0:42:09.320 --> 0:42:12.560
<v Speaker 1>I did start in twenty twenty one with S and X.

0:42:12.680 --> 0:42:15.120
<v Speaker 1>It's now migrated to three, which means it's hitting the

0:42:15.200 --> 0:42:19.239
<v Speaker 1>mainstream buyer, and the mainstream buyer does not like giving

0:42:19.360 --> 0:42:21.719
<v Speaker 1>up their turn signal stocks. What Elon is trying to

0:42:21.760 --> 0:42:24.719
<v Speaker 1>do is trying to go stock free, so you lose

0:42:24.800 --> 0:42:28.000
<v Speaker 1>the turn signal stock and you also lose the windshield

0:42:28.080 --> 0:42:30.920
<v Speaker 1>wiper stock. On the other side, all of those have

0:42:31.080 --> 0:42:34.120
<v Speaker 1>migrated to being buttons on the steering wheel.

0:42:35.280 --> 0:42:38.040
<v Speaker 3>So, as regular viewers of been Bo technology know, I

0:42:38.160 --> 0:42:41.440
<v Speaker 3>have a Model Y which I pay for myself, but

0:42:42.080 --> 0:42:44.759
<v Speaker 3>it has the stalks. The one thing i'd observe is

0:42:44.840 --> 0:42:48.280
<v Speaker 3>like the screen in the middle. There are no dials

0:42:48.360 --> 0:42:50.279
<v Speaker 3>or buttons on the dash. I spend a lot of

0:42:50.320 --> 0:42:53.400
<v Speaker 3>time looking at the screen and reading the JD report.

0:42:53.480 --> 0:42:55.400
<v Speaker 3>I think that was a big point that many of

0:42:55.560 --> 0:42:57.319
<v Speaker 3>the respondents made as well.

0:42:58.400 --> 0:43:01.839
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely, JD Power said. The author of the study told

0:43:01.880 --> 0:43:05.879
<v Speaker 1>me that the consumers report that they have much more

0:43:06.080 --> 0:43:09.719
<v Speaker 1>eyes off the road time because they're hunting around for these,

0:43:10.520 --> 0:43:14.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, ordinary functions. This isn't high level tech that

0:43:14.800 --> 0:43:16.800
<v Speaker 1>people are looking for. They just want to beat the

0:43:16.920 --> 0:43:19.719
<v Speaker 1>horn because something happened in front of them and they

0:43:19.800 --> 0:43:20.360
<v Speaker 1>can't find it.

0:43:21.719 --> 0:43:23.960
<v Speaker 3>We won't get into the whole idea about the future

0:43:23.960 --> 0:43:27.759
<v Speaker 3>of Tesla and full self driving where to Elon Musk's mind,

0:43:28.120 --> 0:43:30.960
<v Speaker 3>you won't need to pay attention anyway. But you've covered

0:43:31.000 --> 0:43:33.440
<v Speaker 3>this industry for such a long time. You've written brilliant

0:43:33.480 --> 0:43:37.800
<v Speaker 3>pieces at the product level. How impactful are these JD reports?

0:43:37.920 --> 0:43:40.839
<v Speaker 6>Like does the average consumer pick it up and go? Well?

0:43:40.880 --> 0:43:42.760
<v Speaker 6>This will inform whether or not I get a Tesla?

0:43:44.040 --> 0:43:48.920
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely, JD Power and consumer reports, those two measures are

0:43:49.000 --> 0:43:51.640
<v Speaker 1>the ones that carry the most weight with consumers. You

0:43:51.719 --> 0:43:55.320
<v Speaker 1>can see it and the automakers advertising they'll you know,

0:43:55.560 --> 0:43:58.000
<v Speaker 1>run the JD Power Seal if they're one of the

0:43:58.080 --> 0:44:02.000
<v Speaker 1>preferred brands. And tess Law has always been the highest

0:44:02.120 --> 0:44:06.879
<v Speaker 1>ranked EV. Now all the other evs, Ribban, the legacy automakers,

0:44:06.920 --> 0:44:10.839
<v Speaker 1>they've all caught up with Tesla, primarily because of these

0:44:11.400 --> 0:44:14.720
<v Speaker 1>rudimentary functions that have been put on the steering wheel

0:44:14.800 --> 0:44:17.520
<v Speaker 1>and taken away from their usual locations.

0:44:18.760 --> 0:44:21.359
<v Speaker 3>In the story, there's a chart of problems per one

0:44:21.440 --> 0:44:24.960
<v Speaker 3>hundred vehicles. But it's also a quality survey. Can we

0:44:25.000 --> 0:44:27.920
<v Speaker 3>just quickly talk about the quality part of this discussion?

0:44:29.160 --> 0:44:31.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so, I mean quality is defined in a couple

0:44:31.680 --> 0:44:35.040
<v Speaker 1>of ways. One is things that break, that don't go well.

0:44:35.360 --> 0:44:39.400
<v Speaker 1>But also quality in this survey now reflects what consumers

0:44:39.440 --> 0:44:43.480
<v Speaker 1>are having trouble operating. It might be functioning as designed,

0:44:43.560 --> 0:44:46.080
<v Speaker 1>but if the driver can't figure out how to use it,

0:44:46.719 --> 0:44:49.920
<v Speaker 1>then that's a quality problem. And so that's what's showing

0:44:50.040 --> 0:44:53.120
<v Speaker 1>up on Tesla here. These are things The buttons work

0:44:53.200 --> 0:44:55.359
<v Speaker 1>if you can find them, but can you find them

0:44:55.560 --> 0:44:59.359
<v Speaker 1>in an emergency situation? And others have pointed out if

0:44:59.400 --> 0:45:02.240
<v Speaker 1>you're in a round about, the way the turn signals

0:45:02.280 --> 0:45:04.960
<v Speaker 1>work out. There's a couple of directional arrows and steering

0:45:04.960 --> 0:45:07.000
<v Speaker 1>wheel during a roundabout and you're in the middle of it,

0:45:07.040 --> 0:45:10.040
<v Speaker 1>your steering wheel's upside down and you don't know which.

0:45:10.080 --> 0:45:10.719
<v Speaker 2>Errow to push.

0:45:11.760 --> 0:45:13.919
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, that's a problem. Bloombergs Keith Norton.

0:45:14.000 --> 0:45:15.880
<v Speaker 3>It's great to catch up and see you here on

0:45:15.920 --> 0:45:16.880
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg Technology.

0:45:16.920 --> 0:45:19.840
<v Speaker 6>Thank you. That does it for this edition of Bloomberg Technology.

0:45:19.920 --> 0:45:21.920
<v Speaker 6>Check out the podcast. What an episode.

0:45:21.960 --> 0:45:22.239
<v Speaker 8>It was.

0:45:22.880 --> 0:45:25.200
<v Speaker 3>Happy Friday to everyone all around the world. This is

0:45:25.280 --> 0:45:26.320
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg Technology.