WEBVTT - Tellers in Dallas: TSLA, FD, PE

0:00:02.720 --> 0:00:07.200
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news.

0:00:08.200 --> 0:00:10.080
<v Speaker 2>I'm really jealous that you're taking two weeks off.

0:00:10.280 --> 0:00:12.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I'm pretty you're already.

0:00:13.520 --> 0:00:15.520
<v Speaker 2>I was going to say that, but I was going

0:00:15.600 --> 0:00:18.520
<v Speaker 2>to say you're already pretty tan. Yeah, I feel like

0:00:18.560 --> 0:00:20.680
<v Speaker 2>so I'm excited to see you after two weeks.

0:00:21.120 --> 0:00:23.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna work very rigorously.

0:00:23.400 --> 0:00:29.200
<v Speaker 2>On my good I mean, were SPF please do it responsible.

0:00:28.760 --> 0:00:31.880
<v Speaker 1>You come back and be like the colorless table for.

0:00:31.880 --> 0:00:36.879
<v Speaker 2>Those table listening at home. It's a handsome mahogany o.

0:00:39.120 --> 0:00:39.559
<v Speaker 1>Plastic.

0:00:40.320 --> 0:00:41.200
<v Speaker 2>It's not real wood.

0:00:41.360 --> 0:00:44.960
<v Speaker 1>It's maybe it is, I don't know what. But yeah,

0:00:45.000 --> 0:00:47.760
<v Speaker 1>So I'm out for the next two weeks.

0:00:48.960 --> 0:00:49.600
<v Speaker 2>I'll be here.

0:00:50.040 --> 0:00:52.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, keep me up to date on the gossip.

0:00:53.200 --> 0:00:55.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, plenty of tea. I'll keep the tea flowing.

0:00:56.960 --> 0:01:00.240
<v Speaker 1>So this episode is coming on this Friday. You will

0:01:00.280 --> 0:01:01.400
<v Speaker 1>have a mail bag.

0:01:01.880 --> 0:01:02.880
<v Speaker 2>Mail bag.

0:01:03.440 --> 0:01:04.959
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna say we're gonna have a mail bag the

0:01:04.959 --> 0:01:05.720
<v Speaker 1>following week.

0:01:05.959 --> 0:01:08.920
<v Speaker 2>We're recording it directly after this episode, so it's actually

0:01:08.959 --> 0:01:11.520
<v Speaker 2>still up in the air. Good to see if we.

0:01:11.760 --> 0:01:14.600
<v Speaker 1>Right, we'll cut the enjoy it potentially, but like probably

0:01:14.600 --> 0:01:16.760
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna have this episode out on August eighth and

0:01:16.800 --> 0:01:18.679
<v Speaker 1>the mail bag out on August fifteenth, and then on

0:01:18.720 --> 0:01:21.600
<v Speaker 1>August twenty second, you'll be alone with your thoughts.

0:01:21.840 --> 0:01:25.039
<v Speaker 2>Money Stuff will go dark, but it'll be okay. I

0:01:25.040 --> 0:01:25.840
<v Speaker 2>think we all need that.

0:01:25.880 --> 0:01:27.160
<v Speaker 1>Recent twenty second.

0:01:27.520 --> 0:01:30.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you know. Actually I won't even be on air

0:01:30.720 --> 0:01:34.520
<v Speaker 2>that day because it'll be our chick, our jackson Hole special.

0:01:34.680 --> 0:01:37.920
<v Speaker 2>So let's all just enjoy jackson Hole together. You know,

0:01:38.000 --> 0:01:40.480
<v Speaker 2>take a look at some central bankers in front of mountaintops.

0:01:40.680 --> 0:01:44.600
<v Speaker 2>And we don't need to listen to a podcast that day.

0:01:44.880 --> 0:01:47.440
<v Speaker 1>But you do need to listen to a podcast.

0:01:47.040 --> 0:01:49.920
<v Speaker 2>Today, and we're going to really try hard to make

0:01:49.960 --> 0:01:50.640
<v Speaker 2>this one good.

0:01:52.560 --> 0:01:56.440
<v Speaker 1>You might Hello, and welcome to the Money Stuff Podcast,

0:01:56.760 --> 0:02:00.520
<v Speaker 1>your weekly podcast where we talk about stuff related to money.

0:02:01.720 --> 0:02:03.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm Matt Levian, and I write the Moneys Doff column

0:02:03.720 --> 0:02:04.680
<v Speaker 1>for Bloomberg Opinion.

0:02:04.960 --> 0:02:07.960
<v Speaker 2>And I'm Katie Greifeld, a reporter for Bloomberg News and

0:02:08.000 --> 0:02:09.640
<v Speaker 2>an anchor for Bloomberg Television.

0:02:10.919 --> 0:02:16.359
<v Speaker 1>Kitty. I feel like I follow Elon must pay more

0:02:16.400 --> 0:02:20.320
<v Speaker 1>than he does more than I don't think that's true.

0:02:20.840 --> 0:02:23.600
<v Speaker 1>Way I believe you must pay. It is rumor that

0:02:23.600 --> 0:02:28.560
<v Speaker 1>he follows my vacation schedule schedules his most insane activities

0:02:28.680 --> 0:02:30.239
<v Speaker 1>for when I'm supposed to be on vacations that I

0:02:30.280 --> 0:02:32.360
<v Speaker 1>have to write about them. I don't think this is true.

0:02:32.400 --> 0:02:35.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't think he consciously going to find out, but

0:02:35.000 --> 0:02:37.679
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna find out here. I am talking on a

0:02:37.720 --> 0:02:40.639
<v Speaker 1>podcast about taking two weeks off. So if Elon does

0:02:40.639 --> 0:02:44.960
<v Speaker 1>something really egregious in the next two weeks, you'll know why.

0:02:45.080 --> 0:02:49.880
<v Speaker 2>Well, he should be happy or right now he got out?

0:02:50.000 --> 0:02:52.080
<v Speaker 1>Or do you think thirty billion dollars makes him happy?

0:02:52.240 --> 0:02:55.239
<v Speaker 1>I'm fine, it's.

0:02:56.440 --> 0:02:59.680
<v Speaker 2>You know, I have to imagine. Maybe he's not completely happy,

0:02:59.720 --> 0:03:02.679
<v Speaker 2>but he he's a degree happier than he was perhaps.

0:03:03.440 --> 0:03:06.560
<v Speaker 1>So the news is that Tesla's board announced that it's

0:03:06.600 --> 0:03:10.360
<v Speaker 1>going to give Elon Musk an interim award of twenty

0:03:10.400 --> 0:03:12.360
<v Speaker 1>eight billion dollars worth of I was going to say

0:03:12.400 --> 0:03:15.640
<v Speaker 1>stock options slightly Morgan's like restricted stock units with a

0:03:15.720 --> 0:03:18.440
<v Speaker 1>strike price, but it's stock options whatever. They also giving

0:03:18.520 --> 0:03:21.440
<v Speaker 1>him that as basically a good faith payment, because, as

0:03:21.440 --> 0:03:23.680
<v Speaker 1>we've talked about on this pot a lot, he was

0:03:23.720 --> 0:03:28.040
<v Speaker 1>awarded a bunch of options in twenty eighteen. They were

0:03:28.080 --> 0:03:30.280
<v Speaker 1>all contingent on him making Tesla the giant company. He

0:03:30.320 --> 0:03:33.000
<v Speaker 1>made Tesla the giant company he got the options. They're

0:03:33.040 --> 0:03:36.640
<v Speaker 1>worth something like eighty seven billion dollars today, and then

0:03:36.840 --> 0:03:39.880
<v Speaker 1>last year at Della Recurt said, no, those weren't valid.

0:03:40.520 --> 0:03:44.400
<v Speaker 1>They go away. And so now Tesla's in this weird bind.

0:03:44.440 --> 0:03:46.200
<v Speaker 1>They're like appealing the decision and stuff. They're trying to

0:03:46.240 --> 0:03:51.040
<v Speaker 1>get him back that money, but there are various governance

0:03:51.080 --> 0:03:53.800
<v Speaker 1>and tax and accounting and legal complications around getting him

0:03:53.800 --> 0:03:56.520
<v Speaker 1>back that money, and they're still kind of figuring out

0:03:56.520 --> 0:03:58.839
<v Speaker 1>how to do it. But as a good faith down

0:03:58.880 --> 0:04:02.119
<v Speaker 1>payment on there desire to give him back those options,

0:04:02.360 --> 0:04:05.160
<v Speaker 1>they gave him back twenty eight billion dollars of them

0:04:05.240 --> 0:04:08.800
<v Speaker 1>this week. So you're asked if that made him happy.

0:04:08.880 --> 0:04:11.960
<v Speaker 1>One thing I wonder is was it a surprise, because

0:04:11.960 --> 0:04:13.640
<v Speaker 1>like the previous set of options, like he sort of

0:04:13.680 --> 0:04:17.040
<v Speaker 1>negotiated with the board, you know, in twenty eighteen, and

0:04:17.120 --> 0:04:18.720
<v Speaker 1>like there was obviously like you know, this is an

0:04:18.760 --> 0:04:22.200
<v Speaker 1>incentive package that you know, we're giving you these targets

0:04:22.200 --> 0:04:24.080
<v Speaker 1>that are super ambitious, but you know you think you

0:04:24.080 --> 0:04:26.920
<v Speaker 1>can meet them. So that was like an employment deal

0:04:27.000 --> 0:04:29.480
<v Speaker 1>that he struck with the board. Right, this is like

0:04:29.880 --> 0:04:32.440
<v Speaker 1>this could have just been like surprise some of your

0:04:32.440 --> 0:04:35.000
<v Speaker 1>money back. It's possible the board did it without him,

0:04:35.200 --> 0:04:36.880
<v Speaker 1>which would be kind of funny. If he just woke

0:04:36.960 --> 0:04:38.880
<v Speaker 1>up one day and, like, you know, at a twenty

0:04:38.920 --> 0:04:41.159
<v Speaker 1>eight billion dollar transfer in his bank account, that'd be

0:04:41.160 --> 0:04:41.680
<v Speaker 1>pretty cool.

0:04:41.960 --> 0:04:44.720
<v Speaker 2>Why twenty eight billion? Why not just make it eighty

0:04:44.760 --> 0:04:45.400
<v Speaker 2>seven billion.

0:04:45.839 --> 0:04:48.960
<v Speaker 1>Part of it is like they're still figuring out what's happening, right,

0:04:48.960 --> 0:04:50.960
<v Speaker 1>So this is like a down payment on figuring out

0:04:51.200 --> 0:04:53.760
<v Speaker 1>the whole answer to this question. Right. If they win

0:04:53.800 --> 0:04:56.880
<v Speaker 1>the appeal, this award goes away, and it's really easier

0:04:56.920 --> 0:05:00.800
<v Speaker 1>to have given him less while they're on appeal. I

0:05:00.839 --> 0:05:04.400
<v Speaker 1>think it's possible that part of the answer is that

0:05:06.680 --> 0:05:10.160
<v Speaker 1>funny that this is to say that Tesla's board of

0:05:10.200 --> 0:05:13.720
<v Speaker 1>directors and the special committee that gave him this award

0:05:14.200 --> 0:05:17.480
<v Speaker 1>are independent and are thinking about their friduciary duty to

0:05:17.680 --> 0:05:22.480
<v Speaker 1>Tesla's minority sholders or outside shoolders, and are thinking not

0:05:22.560 --> 0:05:26.159
<v Speaker 1>only what would be nice for Elon, but also how

0:05:26.200 --> 0:05:29.159
<v Speaker 1>do we motivate him to maximize the value of the company.

0:05:29.480 --> 0:05:31.400
<v Speaker 1>And it's possible that giving him all of the options

0:05:31.440 --> 0:05:33.120
<v Speaker 1>right now is not the answer to that question. It's

0:05:33.120 --> 0:05:36.599
<v Speaker 1>possible that, like the ultimate structure they'll come to is

0:05:36.640 --> 0:05:39.160
<v Speaker 1>something like, you get thirty billion dollars of this stuff

0:05:40.160 --> 0:05:43.240
<v Speaker 1>and a new award with new targets that requires you

0:05:43.320 --> 0:05:46.320
<v Speaker 1>to do new stuff. But for now, they give him

0:05:46.320 --> 0:05:51.800
<v Speaker 1>this award and it has essentially two contingencies. One is

0:05:51.800 --> 0:05:54.599
<v Speaker 1>that he has to say there for two years, which

0:05:55.400 --> 0:05:58.320
<v Speaker 1>who knows, and the other one is that it goes away.

0:05:58.400 --> 0:06:01.080
<v Speaker 1>If they win the appeal, he gets all the previous

0:06:01.080 --> 0:06:01.600
<v Speaker 1>options back.

0:06:01.600 --> 0:06:03.560
<v Speaker 2>He doesn't get these options twenty eighteen options.

0:06:03.640 --> 0:06:05.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so if he gets that, like nineteen thirty seven

0:06:05.480 --> 0:06:08.320
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars, this is not additive to that.

0:06:08.400 --> 0:06:11.360
<v Speaker 2>Like, so no double dipping, no double dipping. Isa, you

0:06:11.440 --> 0:06:15.160
<v Speaker 2>talk about this a little bit in your column that Okay,

0:06:15.520 --> 0:06:18.160
<v Speaker 2>it has these strings attached. It's contingent on him staying

0:06:18.160 --> 0:06:19.039
<v Speaker 2>there for two years.

0:06:19.200 --> 0:06:21.960
<v Speaker 1>Very few strings. Well, like, sure he has to say

0:06:22.000 --> 0:06:24.239
<v Speaker 1>there for two years, but it's like a fourteen billion

0:06:24.279 --> 0:06:25.239
<v Speaker 1>dollars a year payback.

0:06:25.400 --> 0:06:28.159
<v Speaker 2>But isn't I don't know. Isn't a little weird that, Okay,

0:06:28.160 --> 0:06:30.359
<v Speaker 2>you have to stay here another two years, but also

0:06:30.480 --> 0:06:33.080
<v Speaker 2>this is making good on our promise for things you

0:06:33.120 --> 0:06:34.000
<v Speaker 2>already Yeah, I.

0:06:34.000 --> 0:06:36.440
<v Speaker 1>Agree with you. It's a little weird if their mentality

0:06:36.480 --> 0:06:39.400
<v Speaker 1>is truly like we owe you this and we're giving

0:06:39.400 --> 0:06:42.520
<v Speaker 1>it to you no matter what. Then you're right, he

0:06:42.560 --> 0:06:45.159
<v Speaker 1>shouldn't have this there for two years. But I don't

0:06:45.160 --> 0:06:46.960
<v Speaker 1>think they can really do that. I think they really

0:06:47.000 --> 0:06:50.120
<v Speaker 1>have to be like in a posture of like, we

0:06:50.160 --> 0:06:53.480
<v Speaker 1>are maximizing value for the shareholders, and we have to

0:06:53.520 --> 0:06:55.839
<v Speaker 1>get something going forward from it. And if we're just

0:06:55.880 --> 0:06:59.120
<v Speaker 1>giving Elon Musk twenty eight billion dollars on his way

0:06:59.120 --> 0:07:02.640
<v Speaker 1>out the door, then that is not a good use

0:07:02.680 --> 0:07:05.719
<v Speaker 1>of shareholder resources, even if it's in some sense fair true.

0:07:05.960 --> 0:07:09.279
<v Speaker 1>Also like it doesn't seem like that big an ask

0:07:10.200 --> 0:07:14.480
<v Speaker 1>like years, it's like, you know, his main source of

0:07:14.560 --> 0:07:17.240
<v Speaker 1>wealth more or less. And also like it's not that

0:07:17.280 --> 0:07:21.160
<v Speaker 1>big an asking in the sense that, like you and I,

0:07:21.160 --> 0:07:24.160
<v Speaker 1>if we got like a great job opportunity, we would

0:07:24.200 --> 0:07:26.800
<v Speaker 1>have to sadly quit this job to pursue that great job.

0:07:27.520 --> 0:07:29.480
<v Speaker 1>That is not a problem for Elon Musk. He can

0:07:29.520 --> 0:07:31.800
<v Speaker 1>have as many jobs as he wants. Like, they're not

0:07:31.840 --> 0:07:34.840
<v Speaker 1>requiring him to only work at Tesla for two it's

0:07:34.840 --> 0:07:35.880
<v Speaker 1>just like to have it.

0:07:35.880 --> 0:07:38.480
<v Speaker 2>You know, have his name on the door for continuously

0:07:38.680 --> 0:07:40.920
<v Speaker 2>right intermittently.

0:07:41.080 --> 0:07:44.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, an alternate two days so I think it's fine.

0:07:44.800 --> 0:07:46.280
<v Speaker 1>I think he's like not a big ass, right, Like

0:07:46.320 --> 0:07:48.520
<v Speaker 1>he can spend one hundred percent of his time elsewhere

0:07:48.560 --> 0:07:51.000
<v Speaker 1>for two years and still be the CEO of Tesla.

0:07:51.160 --> 0:07:57.320
<v Speaker 2>So yeah, which is so would argue that's what's been happening.

0:07:57.960 --> 0:07:58.960
<v Speaker 1>Many would argue.

0:08:00.280 --> 0:08:00.440
<v Speaker 3>Quo.

0:08:00.600 --> 0:08:01.920
<v Speaker 1>And I think, you know, again, like the board, like

0:08:01.920 --> 0:08:03.760
<v Speaker 1>they're doing two things right. They're trying to be fair

0:08:03.800 --> 0:08:05.960
<v Speaker 1>to Elon, which I think is like a legitimate concern.

0:08:06.040 --> 0:08:09.160
<v Speaker 1>Like I think the board things and Elon things. I

0:08:09.160 --> 0:08:11.720
<v Speaker 1>think they have a real point that he earned this

0:08:11.800 --> 0:08:13.840
<v Speaker 1>eighty seven billion dollars of options, and so you should

0:08:13.840 --> 0:08:16.800
<v Speaker 1>get them and just retroactively, he should get them for

0:08:17.160 --> 0:08:19.520
<v Speaker 1>his prior work. Right, So they're trying to be fair,

0:08:19.680 --> 0:08:21.560
<v Speaker 1>But they're also trying to you know, do good things

0:08:21.600 --> 0:08:24.960
<v Speaker 1>for the company and situate the company well going forward.

0:08:25.040 --> 0:08:27.480
<v Speaker 1>And so you know, their announcement is not just like

0:08:27.560 --> 0:08:29.440
<v Speaker 1>literally like yes, I have a name there for two

0:08:29.440 --> 0:08:32.280
<v Speaker 1>more years. It's like we need him to focus on

0:08:32.400 --> 0:08:36.720
<v Speaker 1>building AI and like attracting talent to this company because

0:08:36.840 --> 0:08:39.480
<v Speaker 1>we're in an arms race for AI and Tesla is

0:08:39.480 --> 0:08:43.240
<v Speaker 1>an AI company. You know, Kittie's rolling rys. It's reasonable

0:08:43.240 --> 0:08:46.679
<v Speaker 1>because like Elmos does have an AI company that's not Tesla.

0:08:46.880 --> 0:08:50.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, but like Tesla is, you know, it's valued like

0:08:50.040 --> 0:08:50.400
<v Speaker 2>an AI.

0:08:50.880 --> 0:08:52.680
<v Speaker 1>It's not valued like a car company that sells as

0:08:52.720 --> 0:08:56.120
<v Speaker 1>many cars as itself. Right, It's valued like the future

0:08:56.160 --> 0:09:00.920
<v Speaker 1>of life, robotics, AI something, some thing something, And so

0:09:01.720 --> 0:09:03.959
<v Speaker 1>to you know, live up to that valuation, they need

0:09:04.000 --> 0:09:07.480
<v Speaker 1>to keep him around to be their futurist in residence.

0:09:07.760 --> 0:09:11.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. I anchor a television show with Matt Miller. Yeah,

0:09:12.080 --> 0:09:15.959
<v Speaker 2>and he's a car guy, So talking about Tesla makes,

0:09:16.040 --> 0:09:17.560
<v Speaker 2>you know, smoke come out of his ears. When we

0:09:17.559 --> 0:09:20.160
<v Speaker 2>talk about the fact that it's a trillion dollar company,

0:09:20.200 --> 0:09:23.680
<v Speaker 2>you add up the market caps of the big three Stilantis, Ford,

0:09:23.760 --> 0:09:25.840
<v Speaker 2>and GM and it comes out to less than one

0:09:25.880 --> 0:09:28.480
<v Speaker 2>hundred and fifty billion dollars, which shocked me. Actually, I

0:09:28.480 --> 0:09:32.959
<v Speaker 2>didn't realize it was that low. So a trillion dollars, Yeah,

0:09:33.200 --> 0:09:34.960
<v Speaker 2>I wanted to talk a little bit more about the

0:09:35.000 --> 0:09:40.280
<v Speaker 2>fact that, Okay, if we're talking about this options package,

0:09:40.320 --> 0:09:42.600
<v Speaker 2>the thirty billion dollar one, so Tesl would take an

0:09:42.720 --> 0:09:45.840
<v Speaker 2>enormous tax hit if this happens.

0:09:45.520 --> 0:09:47.559
<v Speaker 1>Well, Elon Muss would take a tax hit.

0:09:47.840 --> 0:09:49.960
<v Speaker 2>Elon Muss would take a tax hit, Tesla would take

0:09:49.960 --> 0:09:51.440
<v Speaker 2>a hit to their earnings.

0:09:51.480 --> 0:09:51.800
<v Speaker 3>Correct.

0:09:51.920 --> 0:09:53.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Basically, the way it works is that when they

0:09:53.520 --> 0:09:57.520
<v Speaker 1>granted the options in twenty eighteen, they were, for accounting purposes,

0:09:57.840 --> 0:10:00.760
<v Speaker 1>kind of worthless because they were at the money, so

0:10:00.840 --> 0:10:03.240
<v Speaker 1>they were not like a gift of stock that day.

0:10:03.600 --> 0:10:06.400
<v Speaker 1>And because they had these really aggressive conditions where you know,

0:10:06.440 --> 0:10:08.480
<v Speaker 1>it's like a sixty billion dollar company, you would have

0:10:08.520 --> 0:10:10.200
<v Speaker 1>to grow it into a six hundred and fifty billion

0:10:10.240 --> 0:10:12.640
<v Speaker 1>dollar company to get all the options, and so you

0:10:12.640 --> 0:10:14.800
<v Speaker 1>can go to your accounts and say, that's not very

0:10:14.840 --> 0:10:17.560
<v Speaker 1>likely to happen. So the value of this grant day

0:10:17.559 --> 0:10:20.680
<v Speaker 1>one is not very much. When they do it retroactively, now,

0:10:21.000 --> 0:10:23.200
<v Speaker 1>the value of the grant day one is kind of

0:10:23.240 --> 0:10:29.439
<v Speaker 1>twenty eight billion dollars. But they apparently this is a

0:10:29.600 --> 0:10:32.240
<v Speaker 1>disclosure and it's at a little unclear while though I

0:10:32.280 --> 0:10:35.439
<v Speaker 1>have my assumptions. They apparently went to the accounts and

0:10:35.480 --> 0:10:37.440
<v Speaker 1>said it's very unlikely that he'll get these options, and

0:10:37.440 --> 0:10:39.920
<v Speaker 1>so they're worth nothing, and the accounts a great and

0:10:40.000 --> 0:10:41.720
<v Speaker 1>so they say right now that they plan to not

0:10:42.080 --> 0:10:44.719
<v Speaker 1>incur any expense for the options because it's unlikely that

0:10:44.760 --> 0:10:47.600
<v Speaker 1>the performance conditions of the options will be met, but

0:10:47.640 --> 0:10:50.560
<v Speaker 1>there are no performance conditions. So we talked about the

0:10:50.559 --> 0:10:52.640
<v Speaker 1>two conditions, which are one he has to say that

0:10:52.679 --> 0:10:55.480
<v Speaker 1>for two years, and two these go away if he

0:10:55.520 --> 0:10:57.800
<v Speaker 1>gets back the previous charge, like basically, if they win on.

0:10:57.760 --> 0:11:01.760
<v Speaker 2>Appeal court case, it's a Delaware decision is overturned returned.

0:11:01.840 --> 0:11:05.320
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, And so what I think they're saying is that

0:11:05.400 --> 0:11:07.559
<v Speaker 1>there is a less than like twenty five percent chance

0:11:08.800 --> 0:11:12.160
<v Speaker 1>of both of those conditions being met. That is, either

0:11:12.520 --> 0:11:16.480
<v Speaker 1>they're very confident that the Delaware decision will be overturned,

0:11:17.160 --> 0:11:20.040
<v Speaker 1>or they're very confident that he lends going to quit

0:11:20.080 --> 0:11:23.679
<v Speaker 1>in the next two years, or they believe like the

0:11:23.760 --> 0:11:26.360
<v Speaker 1>joint probability of neither of those things happening is very low, right,

0:11:26.400 --> 0:11:29.440
<v Speaker 1>Like they think if the decision is not overturned, hell

0:11:29.520 --> 0:11:32.800
<v Speaker 1>quit something like that. So this is a funny little

0:11:32.880 --> 0:11:36.400
<v Speaker 1>like I don't know what those conversations with their accountants

0:11:36.440 --> 0:11:39.839
<v Speaker 1>were like, but I found it amusing that, Yeah, they

0:11:39.840 --> 0:11:42.320
<v Speaker 1>would not have a high degree of confidence of him

0:11:42.360 --> 0:11:44.360
<v Speaker 1>meeting these very limited performance.

0:11:43.880 --> 0:11:47.360
<v Speaker 2>Conditions, but it seems like, I don't know, listening to that,

0:11:47.360 --> 0:11:50.000
<v Speaker 2>that they seem somewhat confident that the Delaware decision.

0:11:50.160 --> 0:11:51.800
<v Speaker 1>Beeve weird to go to your accountant and be like,

0:11:51.800 --> 0:11:55.679
<v Speaker 1>this one hundred page opinion by the Delaware chancellor is

0:11:55.720 --> 0:11:58.680
<v Speaker 1>obviously wrong in the accounts, Like, yeah, it's obviously wrong.

0:11:58.960 --> 0:12:00.840
<v Speaker 1>That's going to be overturned. Like, you know, I don't

0:12:00.840 --> 0:12:02.720
<v Speaker 1>think they got a legal opinion saying this is definitely

0:12:02.760 --> 0:12:04.679
<v Speaker 1>going to be overturned. Maybe they did. I don't think

0:12:04.679 --> 0:12:06.440
<v Speaker 1>it's crazy, by the way, Like it's kind of a

0:12:06.440 --> 0:12:09.520
<v Speaker 1>weird opinion. It's kind of a weird outcome. Like there's

0:12:09.559 --> 0:12:13.240
<v Speaker 1>this weird political environment where Delaware is losing companies. You

0:12:13.240 --> 0:12:16.599
<v Speaker 1>could imagine it being there's the reasons it would be overturned,

0:12:16.960 --> 0:12:19.320
<v Speaker 1>but it's not like, oh, it's definitely going to be overturned.

0:12:20.520 --> 0:12:24.000
<v Speaker 2>History in real time and we are chronicling it.

0:12:24.440 --> 0:12:26.319
<v Speaker 1>Not for the next two weeks or not that's true.

0:12:26.800 --> 0:12:30.120
<v Speaker 2>Who knows. I didn't say anything about his political activities,

0:12:30.240 --> 0:12:34.120
<v Speaker 2>Like you think about the the serious overhand over the stock.

0:12:34.240 --> 0:12:37.040
<v Speaker 1>No, you're the Tesla board and you're like, OKAYLN, in

0:12:37.160 --> 0:12:39.840
<v Speaker 1>order to get your twenty eight billion dollars of options,

0:12:40.000 --> 0:12:43.520
<v Speaker 1>you have to not do a list of bad things, right,

0:12:43.520 --> 0:12:45.360
<v Speaker 1>we're the list of bad things, Like Okay, sure it

0:12:45.400 --> 0:12:48.160
<v Speaker 1>starts with like enraging customers by doing political activities and

0:12:48.160 --> 0:12:50.520
<v Speaker 1>then go out to like Ketamane and like, you know,

0:12:51.360 --> 0:12:54.080
<v Speaker 1>running seven other companies. Like no, he would much rather

0:12:54.160 --> 0:12:56.120
<v Speaker 1>have his complete freedom to do whatever he wants. And

0:12:56.160 --> 0:13:01.400
<v Speaker 1>then twenty eight billion dollars. I mean, I'm speculating that.

0:13:02.320 --> 0:13:03.520
<v Speaker 2>I talked to him this morning.

0:13:03.559 --> 0:13:06.440
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, Like it's easy for me.

0:13:08.320 --> 0:13:10.400
<v Speaker 2>We're just talking about plenty of money at this point.

0:13:10.400 --> 0:13:13.640
<v Speaker 1>Right, He's like, right, we are talking about funny money. Yeah,

0:13:13.760 --> 0:13:16.440
<v Speaker 1>Like he lives in a state in which if he

0:13:16.520 --> 0:13:19.720
<v Speaker 1>wanted any number of dollars to do anything, he could

0:13:19.720 --> 0:13:22.240
<v Speaker 1>snap his fingers and it would like magically appear. So

0:13:22.480 --> 0:13:26.760
<v Speaker 1>like there is a sense of fairness. There is a

0:13:26.800 --> 0:13:28.960
<v Speaker 1>sense of like, you know, wanting to have a certain

0:13:29.000 --> 0:13:31.800
<v Speaker 1>ownership of Tesla. There's all this stuff that goes into

0:13:31.880 --> 0:13:34.079
<v Speaker 1>him wanting to have tens of billions of dollars of

0:13:34.120 --> 0:13:37.080
<v Speaker 1>Tesla actions. But if he needs money to do something,

0:13:37.080 --> 0:13:38.240
<v Speaker 1>he'll find money to do something.

0:13:38.720 --> 0:13:41.400
<v Speaker 2>He's going to be all right, Gus, he wants to

0:13:41.440 --> 0:13:59.440
<v Speaker 2>be okay, how about corporate actions?

0:13:59.440 --> 0:14:00.600
<v Speaker 1>About corporate access?

0:14:01.200 --> 0:14:06.040
<v Speaker 2>Bradley Sacks over a business insider Bloomberg along great peace

0:14:06.080 --> 0:14:07.319
<v Speaker 2>out about.

0:14:07.080 --> 0:14:09.000
<v Speaker 1>Like the big hedge funds and corporate access. I love

0:14:09.000 --> 0:14:12.280
<v Speaker 1>corporate access because it's like it makes no sense, No,

0:14:12.559 --> 0:14:15.079
<v Speaker 1>it makes total sense, but like it makes people insane.

0:14:15.440 --> 0:14:22.280
<v Speaker 1>Corporate access is like investors largely big you know, institutional investors, hedgehunds,

0:14:22.320 --> 0:14:26.440
<v Speaker 1>and like mutual fund matters. Investors like to meet with

0:14:26.520 --> 0:14:28.800
<v Speaker 1>the companies who shares they own and the companies who

0:14:28.880 --> 0:14:31.280
<v Speaker 1>shares their considering buying. And they will sit down with

0:14:31.320 --> 0:14:35.000
<v Speaker 1>the CEO and be like, so, how's business, And they

0:14:35.080 --> 0:14:39.320
<v Speaker 1>learn things in these meetings. Theoretically, No, theoretically they don't,

0:14:39.400 --> 0:14:41.920
<v Speaker 1>right because, like you know, the US has rules saying

0:14:41.960 --> 0:14:45.840
<v Speaker 1>that regulation FD says that companies can't disclosed material and

0:14:45.880 --> 0:14:49.160
<v Speaker 1>public information to some investors without disclosing it publicly to everyone.

0:14:50.200 --> 0:14:54.040
<v Speaker 1>And yet these meetings happen, and you know that they

0:14:54.160 --> 0:14:57.760
<v Speaker 1>learn something because one they keep doing the meetings, right. Sure,

0:14:58.000 --> 0:15:00.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, people don't waste their time for no reason, right,

0:15:00.040 --> 0:15:02.280
<v Speaker 1>Like they think they're learning something. And then it's like

0:15:02.320 --> 0:15:03.880
<v Speaker 1>a little hard to study. But there are some empirical

0:15:03.880 --> 0:15:06.680
<v Speaker 1>studies where academics like look at these meetings and they

0:15:06.680 --> 0:15:09.960
<v Speaker 1>find that investors who have meetings with management then make

0:15:10.040 --> 0:15:12.840
<v Speaker 1>more informed trading decisions than they do if they don't

0:15:12.840 --> 0:15:15.080
<v Speaker 1>have the meetings. So it's clear that these meetings have

0:15:15.120 --> 0:15:19.720
<v Speaker 1>some value. And you know, it's like this gray intermediate

0:15:19.720 --> 0:15:22.880
<v Speaker 1>area between. They can't get material on public information, right,

0:15:22.920 --> 0:15:24.640
<v Speaker 1>Like the company can't be like, oh, our earnings are

0:15:24.640 --> 0:15:26.160
<v Speaker 1>going to be really good next quarter if they haven't

0:15:26.160 --> 0:15:28.360
<v Speaker 1>already given guidance on the earnings. They can't be like, oh,

0:15:28.400 --> 0:15:29.600
<v Speaker 1>we're getting acquired next week.

0:15:29.640 --> 0:15:29.760
<v Speaker 2>Right.

0:15:29.800 --> 0:15:32.880
<v Speaker 1>They can't give like big material information, but they can

0:15:32.880 --> 0:15:34.840
<v Speaker 1>talk about how they think about the business. They can like,

0:15:35.000 --> 0:15:36.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, talk through the model. They can do a

0:15:36.520 --> 0:15:40.120
<v Speaker 1>lot of helpful stuff for the investors where the investors

0:15:40.160 --> 0:15:45.640
<v Speaker 1>come away learning something without being spoon fed next quarter's earnings.

0:15:45.800 --> 0:15:46.000
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:15:46.720 --> 0:15:49.240
<v Speaker 1>The thing that people always say about this to make

0:15:49.280 --> 0:15:54.200
<v Speaker 1>themselves feel better is that the investors can get a

0:15:54.280 --> 0:16:01.680
<v Speaker 1>read on the executive's tone and body language. On its face, absurd, yes,

0:16:02.520 --> 0:16:05.000
<v Speaker 1>but people keep saying it. They're like, oh, yeah, they

0:16:05.000 --> 0:16:07.120
<v Speaker 1>don't say anything that they haven't already said, but the

0:16:07.240 --> 0:16:08.560
<v Speaker 1>body language tells you something.

0:16:08.600 --> 0:16:11.240
<v Speaker 2>So I can tell you it probably lost its edge

0:16:11.320 --> 0:16:13.400
<v Speaker 2>during the pandemic when you were all on zoom. And

0:16:13.440 --> 0:16:14.440
<v Speaker 2>it's a lot harder to see.

0:16:14.960 --> 0:16:17.080
<v Speaker 1>Oh, that's an interesting question. I feel like there are

0:16:17.120 --> 0:16:20.720
<v Speaker 1>studies and I don't know them, because like that would

0:16:20.760 --> 0:16:22.760
<v Speaker 1>tell you something, right, Yeah, if it in fact lost

0:16:22.760 --> 0:16:25.160
<v Speaker 1>its edge on the pandemic, then that would tell you

0:16:25.600 --> 0:16:28.560
<v Speaker 1>that tone and body language mattered a lot. Yeah, and

0:16:28.600 --> 0:16:31.840
<v Speaker 1>when people are only getting zoom calls, they got less information,

0:16:32.240 --> 0:16:34.840
<v Speaker 1>whereas my thesis is that in fact they're being told

0:16:34.880 --> 0:16:37.800
<v Speaker 1>information and tone in body language is just a euphemism.

0:16:38.160 --> 0:16:40.520
<v Speaker 1>And so in the pandemic, as you get on a

0:16:40.600 --> 0:16:42.600
<v Speaker 1>zoom call and you're like, so, walk me through how

0:16:42.600 --> 0:16:45.000
<v Speaker 1>you're thinking about strategy, and the executive tells you they're like,

0:16:45.040 --> 0:16:45.840
<v Speaker 1>still informative.

0:16:46.120 --> 0:16:50.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, someone should do that. I guess I come at

0:16:50.360 --> 0:16:53.760
<v Speaker 2>it from a skeptical lens as a journalist who talks

0:16:53.800 --> 0:16:57.640
<v Speaker 2>to a lot of CEOs. Not to besmirch any CEOs,

0:16:57.680 --> 0:17:00.240
<v Speaker 2>but a lot of them just follow the script. And

0:17:00.480 --> 0:17:02.840
<v Speaker 2>I mean you listen to them speak at conferences, and

0:17:03.640 --> 0:17:05.679
<v Speaker 2>you know, it's hard to get new news out of

0:17:06.280 --> 0:17:06.960
<v Speaker 2>someone in the C.

0:17:07.000 --> 0:17:10.720
<v Speaker 1>Suite maybe three answers that one you don't five percent

0:17:10.760 --> 0:17:13.600
<v Speaker 1>of their stock. It's possible that a conversation with an

0:17:13.600 --> 0:17:17.639
<v Speaker 1>investor is a different framework from a conversation at a

0:17:17.680 --> 0:17:20.800
<v Speaker 1>conference with a journalist, right, Like, they're media trained, but

0:17:20.840 --> 0:17:25.480
<v Speaker 1>they're trained differently to talk to investors. Right. Two, you

0:17:25.560 --> 0:17:28.760
<v Speaker 1>do not have CIA interrogators to understand their body language.

0:17:28.880 --> 0:17:33.119
<v Speaker 1>Apparently some edge ones that do. And then did I

0:17:33.160 --> 0:17:33.520
<v Speaker 1>have a third?

0:17:33.760 --> 0:17:36.120
<v Speaker 2>You said you had three, so you got to think

0:17:36.160 --> 0:17:39.760
<v Speaker 2>of something. Okay, I'm reading your body language right now,

0:17:39.800 --> 0:17:43.600
<v Speaker 2>and it seems like you're really trying to think. Okay.

0:17:45.480 --> 0:17:48.600
<v Speaker 1>The third point is like you could imagine the investors

0:17:48.600 --> 0:17:51.280
<v Speaker 1>asking different questions because they're not trying to make news.

0:17:51.320 --> 0:17:54.280
<v Speaker 1>That's like like they're trying to make very incremental news, right,

0:17:54.280 --> 0:17:57.080
<v Speaker 1>They're trying to find out like like update their model.

0:17:57.440 --> 0:18:00.040
<v Speaker 2>Well, that was part of the piece. Bradley wrote a

0:18:00.080 --> 0:18:04.200
<v Speaker 2>out how one of the complaints is that the questions

0:18:04.200 --> 0:18:07.000
<v Speaker 2>that are being asked or like becoming so niche to

0:18:07.040 --> 0:18:08.680
<v Speaker 2>the point that they're not useful anymore.

0:18:08.720 --> 0:18:10.439
<v Speaker 1>Oh, I know what my third point was. Okay, My

0:18:10.520 --> 0:18:13.359
<v Speaker 1>third point was that actually in this piece, several investors

0:18:13.359 --> 0:18:16.119
<v Speaker 1>complain that in fact, they have the same point you do,

0:18:16.160 --> 0:18:18.159
<v Speaker 1>which is that the CEOs are now so scripted that

0:18:18.200 --> 0:18:20.600
<v Speaker 1>these meetings have become less useful than it used to be. Yeah,

0:18:20.840 --> 0:18:22.800
<v Speaker 1>not just because the questions are very granular, which is

0:18:22.840 --> 0:18:26.800
<v Speaker 1>like their questions are granular because hedge funds are competing

0:18:26.920 --> 0:18:31.560
<v Speaker 1>to like add extremely granular information to like the information set,

0:18:31.720 --> 0:18:34.679
<v Speaker 1>and so they have very detailed questions, which sometimes annoy

0:18:34.800 --> 0:18:36.840
<v Speaker 1>CEOs who want to talk about like the big pictures.

0:18:36.880 --> 0:18:39.120
<v Speaker 2>Make sure, come on, here's my strategy. Isn't it great?

0:18:39.920 --> 0:18:42.320
<v Speaker 1>Right? I mean the THESS Like the point of this

0:18:42.359 --> 0:18:44.359
<v Speaker 1>piece and what I read about it is that like

0:18:44.680 --> 0:18:46.840
<v Speaker 1>in my role, do you think of like the prestige

0:18:46.840 --> 0:18:50.040
<v Speaker 1>and importance of investment firms and like right now, the

0:18:50.080 --> 0:18:54.560
<v Speaker 1>big four multi strategy hedge funds like the Citadel Millennium

0:18:54.680 --> 0:18:57.639
<v Speaker 1>point seventy two vali Asnis of the world are really

0:18:57.680 --> 0:19:00.680
<v Speaker 1>like on the ascendant, Like they're really prestigious, really sort

0:19:00.680 --> 0:19:05.000
<v Speaker 1>of top employers and the asset management business. But when

0:19:05.040 --> 0:19:08.000
<v Speaker 1>you think about what a CEO wants, they don't want

0:19:08.040 --> 0:19:09.520
<v Speaker 1>to meet with those guys. They want to meet with

0:19:09.560 --> 0:19:11.600
<v Speaker 1>Fidelity and Wellington. They want to meet with long arming

0:19:11.640 --> 0:19:15.000
<v Speaker 1>managers for a number of reasons, one of which is

0:19:15.040 --> 0:19:19.240
<v Speaker 1>that the long only managers have longer tenure, both like

0:19:20.160 --> 0:19:23.320
<v Speaker 1>they hold the stock for decades and also like the

0:19:23.359 --> 0:19:26.200
<v Speaker 1>portfolio managers for decades, whereas like you know, the big

0:19:26.240 --> 0:19:29.520
<v Speaker 1>hedge funds, they're constantly churning through portfolio managers, and they're

0:19:29.520 --> 0:19:31.880
<v Speaker 1>constantly turning through stocks, and so like if you talk

0:19:31.920 --> 0:19:34.359
<v Speaker 1>to Citadel because they own your stock this week, they

0:19:34.400 --> 0:19:36.320
<v Speaker 1>made it own it next week or maybe a different person.

0:19:37.119 --> 0:19:38.720
<v Speaker 1>But there are other reasons, one of which is that

0:19:38.960 --> 0:19:41.240
<v Speaker 1>the hedge funds have these really granular questions, like they're

0:19:41.240 --> 0:19:43.480
<v Speaker 1>really interested in, like what's going to drive the stock

0:19:43.520 --> 0:19:45.639
<v Speaker 1>in the next couple of weeks, and so they're not

0:19:45.640 --> 0:19:47.280
<v Speaker 1>going to ask you about your strategy. And if you're

0:19:47.280 --> 0:19:49.440
<v Speaker 1>the CEO and you're like want to pontificate about the

0:19:49.440 --> 0:19:51.960
<v Speaker 1>big picture for a while, you'd much rather talk to

0:19:52.119 --> 0:19:55.440
<v Speaker 1>a long term, long only investor than to a hedge

0:19:55.440 --> 0:19:59.159
<v Speaker 1>fund who has like very specific questions about margins. And

0:19:59.200 --> 0:20:01.280
<v Speaker 1>then the other reason that they're all twenty seven and

0:20:01.320 --> 0:20:03.399
<v Speaker 1>wearing T shirts and the people at Fidelity know how

0:20:03.400 --> 0:20:03.920
<v Speaker 1>to dress.

0:20:03.760 --> 0:20:05.520
<v Speaker 2>To meet with the CEO just amazing.

0:20:05.640 --> 0:20:07.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's like literally true that like point seventy two

0:20:07.720 --> 0:20:12.480
<v Speaker 1>now mandates blazers because like they were having trouble booking meetings.

0:20:12.160 --> 0:20:16.159
<v Speaker 2>Because they twenty seven year olds and whatever. Yeah, that

0:20:16.280 --> 0:20:18.879
<v Speaker 2>was a fun to bit. I also, and this was

0:20:19.119 --> 0:20:22.399
<v Speaker 2>partly addressed in the article and in your column, I

0:20:22.440 --> 0:20:24.840
<v Speaker 2>feel like part of the reason that these meetings are

0:20:24.920 --> 0:20:28.920
<v Speaker 2>in such high demand is just because time is finite,

0:20:29.000 --> 0:20:33.320
<v Speaker 2>you know, and anything that's scarce is going to be valued,

0:20:33.720 --> 0:20:36.560
<v Speaker 2>and time is scarce, and time with these CEOs is scarce. Yeah,

0:20:36.600 --> 0:20:38.560
<v Speaker 2>so even if it doesn't add that much of an edge,

0:20:38.600 --> 0:20:40.800
<v Speaker 2>you still have it right.

0:20:40.880 --> 0:20:43.600
<v Speaker 1>I think there's an enormous culture in finance and business

0:20:43.600 --> 0:20:46.760
<v Speaker 1>generally of like, if you think that doing a thing

0:20:47.240 --> 0:20:50.080
<v Speaker 1>has a one percent chance of adding one percent to

0:20:50.119 --> 0:20:53.399
<v Speaker 1>your returns, you're just like hardcore and you do it anyway.

0:20:53.480 --> 0:20:55.400
<v Speaker 2>I gotta get it right, Like.

0:20:55.359 --> 0:21:00.119
<v Speaker 1>I have transcended that. But like, you know, you're in

0:21:00.119 --> 0:21:02.359
<v Speaker 1>that seat because you work really hard and like sort

0:21:02.359 --> 0:21:04.520
<v Speaker 1>of do everything you possibly can to get edge. And

0:21:04.520 --> 0:21:06.400
<v Speaker 1>so even though the meeting will probably be worth less,

0:21:06.400 --> 0:21:08.600
<v Speaker 1>peel got it anyway. But the other thing about scarcity

0:21:08.680 --> 0:21:10.600
<v Speaker 1>is that at these firms, you know, like the big

0:21:10.640 --> 0:21:14.399
<v Speaker 1>hedge ones have multiple teams trading the same sector, and

0:21:14.480 --> 0:21:17.600
<v Speaker 1>so you know, if you're the CEO and you book

0:21:17.600 --> 0:21:20.360
<v Speaker 1>a meeting with Citadel, there's like five pms at Citadel,

0:21:20.400 --> 0:21:22.119
<v Speaker 1>who are fighting each other tooth and nail to be

0:21:22.160 --> 0:21:23.480
<v Speaker 1>the one in the meeting or like the two in

0:21:23.520 --> 0:21:23.879
<v Speaker 1>the meeting.

0:21:23.920 --> 0:21:26.600
<v Speaker 2>You know, honestly, it reminded me so much of working

0:21:26.640 --> 0:21:27.520
<v Speaker 2>in a large newsroom.

0:21:27.640 --> 0:21:29.720
<v Speaker 1>I know, I was gonna see right yeah, right.

0:21:29.560 --> 0:21:33.000
<v Speaker 2>Like it's very you have a beat, and you're pretty

0:21:33.000 --> 0:21:36.680
<v Speaker 2>protective of your beat, and it's funny to read about

0:21:36.720 --> 0:21:39.679
<v Speaker 2>it becoming like part of a recruiting perk is that

0:21:39.800 --> 0:21:43.159
<v Speaker 2>you're the only person covering this. You don't have to

0:21:43.240 --> 0:21:45.800
<v Speaker 2>fight for your lane. This is only your lane, or

0:21:45.840 --> 0:21:46.440
<v Speaker 2>it's even worse.

0:21:46.480 --> 0:21:49.360
<v Speaker 1>It's like Bradley Sacks writes that like the most tenured

0:21:49.400 --> 0:21:52.919
<v Speaker 1>pms will often get the best meetings. Like you know,

0:21:52.920 --> 0:21:54.840
<v Speaker 1>if Citadel has a meeting with a company, they'll be like,

0:21:55.160 --> 0:21:57.280
<v Speaker 1>the guy's been here the longest and like does the

0:21:57.280 --> 0:22:00.879
<v Speaker 1>best work gets to have the meeting. But like sometimes

0:22:00.920 --> 0:22:03.679
<v Speaker 1>they'll hire someone and like the new guy gets the

0:22:03.720 --> 0:22:06.399
<v Speaker 1>meeting because that's like a recruiting perk, and then the

0:22:06.560 --> 0:22:08.640
<v Speaker 1>long tenured person doesn't get that good at the meeting.

0:22:08.640 --> 0:22:12.520
<v Speaker 1>And it's it's just like there's a lot of parallels, right, no, right,

0:22:12.560 --> 0:22:15.760
<v Speaker 1>Like I've been in meetings with like many other journalists

0:22:15.800 --> 0:22:18.159
<v Speaker 1>where one it's competitive to get into the meeting, and

0:22:18.200 --> 0:22:20.480
<v Speaker 1>then too everyone's like, you know, it's competitive to get

0:22:20.480 --> 0:22:21.320
<v Speaker 1>your question answered.

0:22:21.480 --> 0:22:22.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and it seems.

0:22:22.560 --> 0:22:23.560
<v Speaker 1>Similar in this case.

0:22:23.880 --> 0:22:24.600
<v Speaker 2>That's so funny.

0:22:24.960 --> 0:22:26.760
<v Speaker 1>The other thing I wanted to say, yeah, because I

0:22:26.800 --> 0:22:30.600
<v Speaker 1>wrote about this, and I wrote about broadly speaking, CEOs

0:22:30.640 --> 0:22:32.960
<v Speaker 1>would rather meet with like Fidelity or Wellington than with

0:22:33.359 --> 0:22:36.200
<v Speaker 1>State a point seventy two. And then it's a throw

0:22:36.359 --> 0:22:37.840
<v Speaker 1>I was like, and they probably won't meet with you, know,

0:22:37.840 --> 0:22:39.639
<v Speaker 1>if you want a hundred shares and you're a retail industrial,

0:22:39.680 --> 0:22:42.960
<v Speaker 1>they probably won't be with you. And I found the

0:22:43.040 --> 0:22:46.800
<v Speaker 1>academic paper I wrote about Wednesday where they basically tested

0:22:46.800 --> 0:22:48.879
<v Speaker 1>that out by sending cold emails to a lot of

0:22:48.920 --> 0:22:52.800
<v Speaker 1>investor relations departments. And the cold emails, some of them

0:22:52.840 --> 0:22:57.399
<v Speaker 1>were from like a Yahoo dot commumail address like like

0:22:57.440 --> 0:22:59.400
<v Speaker 1>a high I'm an individual investor, I'd like to buy

0:22:59.400 --> 0:23:01.240
<v Speaker 1>your stock? Could you meet with me? And some of

0:23:01.240 --> 0:23:05.560
<v Speaker 1>them are from fake investment firms like like I work

0:23:05.600 --> 0:23:08.000
<v Speaker 1>at Blue Willow Capital and I'd like to meet with you.

0:23:08.119 --> 0:23:08.760
<v Speaker 2>It sounds right.

0:23:09.000 --> 0:23:12.679
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. They found, first of all, that about sixteen percent

0:23:12.720 --> 0:23:16.199
<v Speaker 1>of these messages resulted in meetings, which is higher than

0:23:16.240 --> 0:23:18.600
<v Speaker 1>I would have thought. Not bad, right, And second, well,

0:23:18.640 --> 0:23:21.520
<v Speaker 1>there's no distinction between retail investor and Blue Weellow capital,

0:23:21.560 --> 0:23:24.000
<v Speaker 1>Like retail people could get the meetings just blue. Well

0:23:24.200 --> 0:23:26.159
<v Speaker 1>they did find racial discrimination though.

0:23:26.520 --> 0:23:31.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, don't love that. This reminds me. We were talking

0:23:31.200 --> 0:23:34.040
<v Speaker 2>about Hymns and HER's earnings on air this week, and

0:23:34.640 --> 0:23:36.680
<v Speaker 2>the Hymns and Her CEO has made sort of a

0:23:36.720 --> 0:23:39.240
<v Speaker 2>big show of like giving questions in the earnings call

0:23:39.320 --> 0:23:40.520
<v Speaker 2>to retail investors.

0:23:41.040 --> 0:23:43.320
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, right, Like my perception of it being hard for

0:23:43.359 --> 0:23:45.640
<v Speaker 1>retail is kind of an old school perception, and now

0:23:45.680 --> 0:23:47.359
<v Speaker 1>with like memeslags, it's a different game.

0:23:47.560 --> 0:23:48.280
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:23:48.480 --> 0:23:50.679
<v Speaker 2>Also somewhat related to this, I was talking to a

0:23:50.760 --> 0:23:56.120
<v Speaker 2>CEO who reported earnings this week, and the CEO said that, Okay,

0:23:56.880 --> 0:23:58.520
<v Speaker 2>if you're report in the afternoon, then you do the

0:23:58.520 --> 0:24:04.359
<v Speaker 2>earnings call. But then this CEO was answering questions from

0:24:04.359 --> 0:24:06.800
<v Speaker 2>analysts until like ten pm that night. Like, you have

0:24:06.840 --> 0:24:09.639
<v Speaker 2>the earnings call and they asked the questions and the

0:24:09.680 --> 0:24:11.879
<v Speaker 2>transcript goes out and you can see it is public.

0:24:11.920 --> 0:24:14.960
<v Speaker 2>But then like the real questions come after the earnings call.

0:24:15.200 --> 0:24:16.679
<v Speaker 2>So you have the earnings call and then you have

0:24:16.720 --> 0:24:17.800
<v Speaker 2>all your individual calls.

0:24:17.920 --> 0:24:21.880
<v Speaker 1>This is the thing that people naively think regulation FD prevents, right,

0:24:22.480 --> 0:24:24.400
<v Speaker 1>everything has to be public, But no, And you see

0:24:24.440 --> 0:24:26.720
<v Speaker 1>it on like public earnings called transcripts. You know, people

0:24:26.720 --> 0:24:29.520
<v Speaker 1>ask questions and the CFI will be like, follow up

0:24:29.520 --> 0:24:31.760
<v Speaker 1>with me afterwards and we'll walk through that, right, and like,

0:24:31.960 --> 0:24:34.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, like obviously the case that companies talk to

0:24:35.040 --> 0:24:38.840
<v Speaker 1>analysts and investors outside of the you know, one hour

0:24:38.920 --> 0:24:41.720
<v Speaker 1>public earnings call, and it seems to be obviously the

0:24:41.760 --> 0:24:44.159
<v Speaker 1>case that those conversations are useful, but they exist in

0:24:44.200 --> 0:24:45.720
<v Speaker 1>this weird regulatory limbo.

0:24:46.520 --> 0:24:49.280
<v Speaker 2>I find that frustrating because as a journalist, I'm not

0:24:49.320 --> 0:24:52.040
<v Speaker 2>allowed to sit in on those one on one leadings.

0:24:52.520 --> 0:25:08.359
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:25:08.400 --> 0:25:11.520
<v Speaker 2>Should we check in on the state of on cycle recruiting.

0:25:11.680 --> 0:25:15.440
<v Speaker 2>Let's check in Bank of America. Yeah, well, Bank of America,

0:25:15.920 --> 0:25:18.520
<v Speaker 2>the news came out this week, written by Catherine Doherty

0:25:18.640 --> 0:25:23.080
<v Speaker 2>that their junior bankers face reassignment if they accept other jobs.

0:25:23.680 --> 0:25:26.800
<v Speaker 2>Just the latest in a string of the big banks

0:25:27.160 --> 0:25:31.920
<v Speaker 2>pushing back against on cycle recruiting. Right, so the busy summer.

0:25:32.040 --> 0:25:34.080
<v Speaker 1>One thing I wonder about is like why are they

0:25:34.080 --> 0:25:34.600
<v Speaker 1>pushing back?

0:25:34.760 --> 0:25:38.000
<v Speaker 2>Why are they pushing back in general, like the dynamics.

0:25:37.480 --> 0:25:40.320
<v Speaker 1>Here are like JP Morgan led the charge of saying

0:25:40.359 --> 0:25:43.840
<v Speaker 1>we're not going to allow recruiting, we're mad about it,

0:25:43.920 --> 0:25:47.119
<v Speaker 1>we'll fire you, and then a number of big private

0:25:47.119 --> 0:25:51.399
<v Speaker 1>equity firms announced they would wait to do on cycle.

0:25:51.119 --> 0:25:53.400
<v Speaker 2>Recruiting led by Apollo. It feels like.

0:25:53.480 --> 0:25:57.400
<v Speaker 1>Most banks did not join in saying where we're going

0:25:57.440 --> 0:25:59.240
<v Speaker 1>to fire you, and most private acuity firms did not

0:25:59.280 --> 0:26:01.920
<v Speaker 1>announce we're not going to do encycle recruiting for two years,

0:26:02.720 --> 0:26:08.000
<v Speaker 1>but also didn't happen. Like everyone is like quietly tacitly

0:26:08.200 --> 0:26:11.399
<v Speaker 1>going along with this process started by JP Morgan, and

0:26:11.440 --> 0:26:13.320
<v Speaker 1>it's like a two side like the banks and the

0:26:13.320 --> 0:26:16.320
<v Speaker 1>priority from every seems like to have. There's like a

0:26:16.480 --> 0:26:19.960
<v Speaker 1>possibly fragile equilibrium where they're not doing the recruiting, and

0:26:20.040 --> 0:26:24.199
<v Speaker 1>so there's not really a need I don't think for

0:26:24.280 --> 0:26:26.159
<v Speaker 1>the banks to say we'll fire you if you do it,

0:26:26.200 --> 0:26:28.359
<v Speaker 1>because it's not happening. But you know, you got to

0:26:28.359 --> 0:26:30.000
<v Speaker 1>get ahead of it. So some of the banks are

0:26:30.080 --> 0:26:32.679
<v Speaker 1>joining in, and so this week Bank of America said

0:26:33.440 --> 0:26:36.800
<v Speaker 1>except an offer elsewhere, you'll be reassigned, which is very

0:26:36.800 --> 0:26:42.240
<v Speaker 1>ominous because they don't say where, and like, well, Bank

0:26:42.280 --> 0:26:46.359
<v Speaker 1>of America has tellers a lot of possibilities.

0:26:46.720 --> 0:26:49.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that was more tired than I was thinking I do,

0:26:49.760 --> 0:26:51.280
<v Speaker 2>I don't say yeah.

0:26:51.320 --> 0:26:53.399
<v Speaker 1>And it's you know, like the idea of on cycle

0:26:53.400 --> 0:26:56.439
<v Speaker 1>recruiting is so strange, right, but it essentially it's you

0:26:56.520 --> 0:26:59.400
<v Speaker 1>will at the beginning of your investment making analyst job

0:26:59.680 --> 0:27:02.720
<v Speaker 1>except an offer at a private equity job. But that

0:27:02.760 --> 0:27:05.879
<v Speaker 1>private equity job is contingent on you spending two years

0:27:06.240 --> 0:27:09.040
<v Speaker 1>being an investment banking analyst, because you do need to

0:27:09.119 --> 0:27:11.080
<v Speaker 1>learn the stuff that you do as an investment banking

0:27:11.080 --> 0:27:15.720
<v Speaker 1>analyst to be an effective private equity associate. And so

0:27:15.840 --> 0:27:19.000
<v Speaker 1>you have two years of working in you know, an

0:27:19.000 --> 0:27:20.520
<v Speaker 1>industry group or an m and A group or a

0:27:20.560 --> 0:27:23.600
<v Speaker 1>Leffin group at a bank where you like learn enough

0:27:23.880 --> 0:27:26.960
<v Speaker 1>to become a useful associate at a PE firm. And

0:27:27.000 --> 0:27:29.640
<v Speaker 1>if you get fired at your bank, the PE firm

0:27:29.640 --> 0:27:33.080
<v Speaker 1>will probably rescind your offer because you haven't done the

0:27:33.080 --> 0:27:35.399
<v Speaker 1>training that they require, And if you'd reassigned to being

0:27:35.440 --> 0:27:38.400
<v Speaker 1>a teller, then like also not the training they would

0:27:38.440 --> 0:27:38.800
<v Speaker 1>have wanted.

0:27:39.080 --> 0:27:42.359
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you can kind of feel for these analysts because

0:27:42.400 --> 0:27:45.960
<v Speaker 2>also they're probably not having a lot of fun in general, sure.

0:27:45.760 --> 0:27:48.840
<v Speaker 1>And like one thing reassigned could mean is like if

0:27:48.880 --> 0:27:54.000
<v Speaker 1>you work in the tech group and you get a

0:27:54.080 --> 0:27:58.720
<v Speaker 1>job at like a tech focused private equity firm, then

0:27:58.840 --> 0:28:00.920
<v Speaker 1>Bank of America will say, Okay, we're gonna reassign you

0:28:01.000 --> 0:28:02.840
<v Speaker 1>because there's conflict of theventswers there, so we're going to

0:28:02.880 --> 0:28:06.560
<v Speaker 1>move you to like the natural resources group. Like that

0:28:06.600 --> 0:28:09.639
<v Speaker 1>would be like appairly benign interpretation that this one doesn't

0:28:09.640 --> 0:28:11.560
<v Speaker 1>get the sense that's what's happening, right, You get the

0:28:11.600 --> 0:28:13.359
<v Speaker 1>sense that it's like a punitive reassignment.

0:28:13.560 --> 0:28:16.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, going by what the story said, this is according

0:28:16.560 --> 0:28:19.480
<v Speaker 2>to people familiar with the matter, junior bankers are being

0:28:19.480 --> 0:28:21.840
<v Speaker 2>asked by their managers to divulge whether they have a

0:28:21.880 --> 0:28:25.440
<v Speaker 2>new employment opportunity and if future offers are accepted, those

0:28:25.480 --> 0:28:29.560
<v Speaker 2>individuals will likely be moved to another area within the bank.

0:28:29.680 --> 0:28:32.440
<v Speaker 2>So searching for detail there. But they have a week.

0:28:32.680 --> 0:28:36.280
<v Speaker 2>Apparently those who fail to disclose accepted offers within a

0:28:36.280 --> 0:28:40.760
<v Speaker 2>week would be deemed in violation. It's interesting to see

0:28:40.760 --> 0:28:45.239
<v Speaker 2>how different banks are approaching this. Apparently Goldman has you right,

0:28:45.280 --> 0:28:45.880
<v Speaker 2>Goldman has.

0:28:45.760 --> 0:28:48.360
<v Speaker 1>The chart approach where they're like most are they do have.

0:28:48.440 --> 0:28:50.840
<v Speaker 2>Well, you have to restate your loyalty every three months

0:28:50.880 --> 0:28:51.280
<v Speaker 2>or something.

0:28:51.440 --> 0:28:53.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, every three months you have to say you haven't

0:28:53.000 --> 0:28:55.560
<v Speaker 1>taken a job elsewhere. Yeah, But they also have like

0:28:55.840 --> 0:28:58.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, there's like three tiers of prestige. Right, there's

0:28:58.640 --> 0:29:02.080
<v Speaker 1>like private equity, and then there's investment banking, and then

0:29:02.120 --> 0:29:06.680
<v Speaker 1>there's like operations back office tellers. Right, and Goldman says,

0:29:06.680 --> 0:29:08.160
<v Speaker 1>if you stay here for two years, we're going to

0:29:08.200 --> 0:29:10.840
<v Speaker 1>try to move you into our own I was gonna

0:29:10.840 --> 0:29:14.160
<v Speaker 1>say private equity division. Yeah, their own like alts division, Yeah,

0:29:14.280 --> 0:29:17.560
<v Speaker 1>private area is. And then Man of America says, if

0:29:17.560 --> 0:29:18.800
<v Speaker 1>you don't stay here for two years, we're going to

0:29:18.840 --> 0:29:19.840
<v Speaker 1>move you into being a teller.

0:29:19.920 --> 0:29:24.640
<v Speaker 2>So yeah. So Jamie Diamond, it feels like he started

0:29:24.640 --> 0:29:27.240
<v Speaker 2>this all off a couple months ago. I do wonder

0:29:27.320 --> 0:29:30.560
<v Speaker 2>like if it had been Wells Fargo who led the charge,

0:29:30.960 --> 0:29:33.920
<v Speaker 2>would we be seeing this cascade of other banks lining

0:29:34.000 --> 0:29:36.080
<v Speaker 2>up and saying we're also not okay with this, this

0:29:36.160 --> 0:29:38.280
<v Speaker 2>is what we're gonna do. Or is it uniquely like

0:29:38.400 --> 0:29:41.680
<v Speaker 2>Jamie Diamond and JP Morgan are doing this and all

0:29:41.680 --> 0:29:43.480
<v Speaker 2>the other big banks feel pressure to follow.

0:29:43.880 --> 0:29:45.720
<v Speaker 1>I think Jamie Diamond has a lot of like moral

0:29:45.800 --> 0:29:48.000
<v Speaker 1>leadership I don't even know about the other banks feeling

0:29:48.040 --> 0:29:51.080
<v Speaker 1>pressure to follow. Yeah, the other banks feel cover to follow, right,

0:29:51.080 --> 0:29:53.920
<v Speaker 1>because like this is a competitive market. And if one

0:29:54.000 --> 0:29:56.200
<v Speaker 1>bank says, and this has happened before, if one bank

0:29:56.240 --> 0:29:58.200
<v Speaker 1>says we're going to fire you if you take a

0:29:58.200 --> 0:30:01.720
<v Speaker 1>private equity job too early, and no other bank says that,

0:30:01.920 --> 0:30:05.640
<v Speaker 1>then people won't go to work at that bank because

0:30:05.640 --> 0:30:08.160
<v Speaker 1>they will want their private equity job. But JP Morgan says,

0:30:08.240 --> 0:30:10.400
<v Speaker 1>Abymary is pretty big, and so you have cover. But

0:30:10.440 --> 0:30:12.840
<v Speaker 1>the other thing is like, also like the people who

0:30:12.960 --> 0:30:16.720
<v Speaker 1>run private equity firms care about what Jamie Diamond thinks. Yeah,

0:30:16.880 --> 0:30:19.320
<v Speaker 1>not even like as a market's and competitive matterage. So

0:30:19.320 --> 0:30:21.200
<v Speaker 1>they're like, oh yeah, they respect that guy, and so

0:30:21.240 --> 0:30:22.640
<v Speaker 1>when he says it, they're like, oh yeah, he's right

0:30:22.680 --> 0:30:25.440
<v Speaker 1>because probably everyone knows he's right. Like it's not super controversial,

0:30:25.480 --> 0:30:27.240
<v Speaker 1>Like no one's like that up said about it. And

0:30:27.280 --> 0:30:29.000
<v Speaker 1>I think if you, like, if you're talking to private

0:30:29.040 --> 0:30:33.440
<v Speaker 1>ay people, they are not thrilled with the current process.

0:30:34.360 --> 0:30:38.280
<v Speaker 1>The current process does not do a good job like

0:30:38.400 --> 0:30:41.280
<v Speaker 1>the old process, the process where they you know, interview

0:30:41.600 --> 0:30:44.200
<v Speaker 1>before people started banks does not do a good job

0:30:44.240 --> 0:30:46.720
<v Speaker 1>of finding people who are knowledgeable does not do a

0:30:46.720 --> 0:30:49.520
<v Speaker 1>good job of finding people who are really motivated because

0:30:49.520 --> 0:30:53.120
<v Speaker 1>you don't know anything yet they worked as bankers yet, Yeah,

0:30:53.160 --> 0:30:54.600
<v Speaker 1>if you interview them after a year and a half

0:30:54.640 --> 0:30:58.200
<v Speaker 1>in banking and they're like dead eyed and have both

0:30:58.240 --> 0:31:00.760
<v Speaker 1>a thousand models, like, it's easy to find out who

0:31:00.800 --> 0:31:02.680
<v Speaker 1>really wants to be there, who's really interested, who's like

0:31:02.760 --> 0:31:05.239
<v Speaker 1>learned a lot, and so it's a better system for them.

0:31:05.280 --> 0:31:07.800
<v Speaker 1>And then the other thing is we live in a

0:31:07.920 --> 0:31:11.880
<v Speaker 1>very uncertain world about the hiring needs of private equity

0:31:11.880 --> 0:31:12.880
<v Speaker 1>firms two years out.

0:31:13.040 --> 0:31:17.440
<v Speaker 2>That's true. Robots are coming, Robots are coming, the death

0:31:17.480 --> 0:31:19.040
<v Speaker 2>of the universe, the.

0:31:18.840 --> 0:31:23.240
<v Speaker 1>Deal flow situation is, and there's less need for associates

0:31:23.320 --> 0:31:25.440
<v Speaker 1>right now than people might have predicted two years ago.

0:31:25.480 --> 0:31:28.320
<v Speaker 1>And so why why predict two years out? You can

0:31:28.400 --> 0:31:30.840
<v Speaker 1>just wait and if everyone can wait, then everyone can wait.

0:31:31.040 --> 0:31:33.840
<v Speaker 2>So you called it the old system, and that I'm.

0:31:33.760 --> 0:31:36.880
<v Speaker 1>Sorry, the system as of six months ago.

0:31:37.200 --> 0:31:37.400
<v Speaker 3>Right.

0:31:37.640 --> 0:31:39.480
<v Speaker 2>Well, I was going to ask, do you think that

0:31:39.680 --> 0:31:42.560
<v Speaker 2>this changes anything? Like have we seen the end of

0:31:42.600 --> 0:31:46.640
<v Speaker 2>this cycle? Is this a lasting fragile what did you

0:31:46.640 --> 0:31:49.200
<v Speaker 2>call it? I liked that fragile equilibrium.

0:31:49.520 --> 0:31:54.520
<v Speaker 1>I think that between the AI stuff and the relative

0:31:54.560 --> 0:32:01.040
<v Speaker 1>slowdown pe no one is desperate to hire the best

0:32:01.040 --> 0:32:03.160
<v Speaker 1>possible twenty two year olds to start in two years.

0:32:03.680 --> 0:32:06.760
<v Speaker 1>Those are separate points from like Jamie Diamond's moral authority.

0:32:07.440 --> 0:32:12.560
<v Speaker 1>I think in five years. In two years, if private

0:32:12.600 --> 0:32:14.720
<v Speaker 1>equity is booming and they're desperate for people to do

0:32:14.800 --> 0:32:18.520
<v Speaker 1>deals and the A thing was just the hype, and

0:32:18.560 --> 0:32:21.479
<v Speaker 1>they think, how do I get the best possible forty

0:32:21.520 --> 0:32:26.040
<v Speaker 1>bodies and seats, they'll be interviewing earlier. These things always

0:32:26.080 --> 0:32:26.840
<v Speaker 1>break down.

0:32:26.680 --> 0:32:28.920
<v Speaker 2>But I guess that's what it's psychled does because.

0:32:28.680 --> 0:32:30.800
<v Speaker 1>Of competitive pressures, right, And if there are no competitive

0:32:30.800 --> 0:32:32.760
<v Speaker 1>pressures for them to break down, they won't break down.

0:32:32.880 --> 0:32:33.800
<v Speaker 1>So I don't know when that'll be.

0:32:34.800 --> 0:32:39.520
<v Speaker 2>So watch this space, all right, comebey, Okay, all right, Matt.

0:32:39.560 --> 0:32:41.840
<v Speaker 3>Bye.

0:32:42.720 --> 0:32:44.200
<v Speaker 1>And that was the Money Stuff Podcast.

0:32:44.320 --> 0:32:46.360
<v Speaker 2>I'm Matt Livian and I'm Katie Greifeld.

0:32:46.680 --> 0:32:48.760
<v Speaker 1>You can find my work by subscribing to the Money

0:32:48.760 --> 0:32:51.240
<v Speaker 1>Stuff newsletter on Bloomberg dot com.

0:32:51.200 --> 0:32:53.720
<v Speaker 2>And you can find me on Bloomberg TV every day

0:32:53.760 --> 0:32:56.800
<v Speaker 2>on Open Interest between nine to eleven am Eastern.

0:32:57.080 --> 0:32:58.800
<v Speaker 1>We'd love to hear from you. You can send an

0:32:58.800 --> 0:33:01.959
<v Speaker 1>email to money Pod at Bloomberg dot net. Ask us

0:33:01.960 --> 0:33:03.480
<v Speaker 1>a question and we might answer it on air.

0:33:03.760 --> 0:33:05.920
<v Speaker 2>You can also subscribe to our show wherever you're listening

0:33:06.000 --> 0:33:08.000
<v Speaker 2>right now and leave us a review. It helps more

0:33:08.040 --> 0:33:08.920
<v Speaker 2>people find the show.

0:33:09.400 --> 0:33:12.040
<v Speaker 1>The Money Stuff podcast that is produced by Ana Mazerakus

0:33:12.080 --> 0:33:12.959
<v Speaker 1>and Moses Ondon.

0:33:13.480 --> 0:33:16.160
<v Speaker 2>Our theme music was composed by Blake Maples and Sage

0:33:16.160 --> 0:33:17.840
<v Speaker 2>Bauman is Bloomberg's head of Podcasts.

0:33:18.080 --> 0:33:20.400
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening to The Money Stuff Podcast. We'll be

0:33:20.480 --> 0:33:22.040
<v Speaker 1>back next week with more stuff