WEBVTT - Elon Musk and the SEC, and Uber's Super App

0:00:02.800 --> 0:00:06.160
<v Speaker 1>From the heart of where innovation, money and power collive

0:00:06.920 --> 0:00:11.399
<v Speaker 1>in Silicon Valley and beyond. This is Bloomberg Technology with

0:00:11.480 --> 0:00:27.240
<v Speaker 1>Emily jay I'm Emily Jang in San Francisco, and this

0:00:27.280 --> 0:00:29.680
<v Speaker 1>is Bloomberg Technology coming up in the next hour, from

0:00:29.800 --> 0:00:34.160
<v Speaker 1>largest shareholder to board member. How Elon Musk's sudden moves

0:00:34.200 --> 0:00:37.160
<v Speaker 1>at Twitter could raise alarm at the SEC We will

0:00:37.200 --> 0:00:41.840
<v Speaker 1>have all the details. Plus Uber adds flights, trains, even

0:00:41.880 --> 0:00:45.320
<v Speaker 1>hotels to a pilot program and it's super apt. Push

0:00:45.680 --> 0:00:47.880
<v Speaker 1>will tell you how CEO Dara kus Rashah he wants

0:00:47.880 --> 0:00:52.880
<v Speaker 1>to expand beyond rides and food delivery, and bitcoin is

0:00:52.920 --> 0:00:55.600
<v Speaker 1>now underway in Miami. We will bring you the latest

0:00:55.600 --> 0:00:57.440
<v Speaker 1>from the cryptoconference and catch up with some of the

0:00:57.480 --> 0:01:01.160
<v Speaker 1>attendees later this hour. The big are in tech, of course,

0:01:01.160 --> 0:01:03.960
<v Speaker 1>Elon Musk joining the board of Twitter twenty four hours

0:01:04.000 --> 0:01:06.520
<v Speaker 1>after his nine point two percent stake in the company

0:01:06.840 --> 0:01:09.800
<v Speaker 1>was disclosed. What does this mean from the platform's future?

0:01:09.840 --> 0:01:11.720
<v Speaker 1>I want to dig deeper into this with Daphney Keller,

0:01:12.120 --> 0:01:15.240
<v Speaker 1>director of the Program on Platform Regulation at the Stanford

0:01:15.319 --> 0:01:18.759
<v Speaker 1>Cyber Policy Center. Daphney, great to have you back with us.

0:01:18.760 --> 0:01:20.840
<v Speaker 1>So it's been a War one seventy two hours. In

0:01:20.920 --> 0:01:23.480
<v Speaker 1>just the last twenty four hours, Musk has now filed

0:01:23.959 --> 0:01:26.880
<v Speaker 1>to become an active investor in Twitter, not just a

0:01:26.920 --> 0:01:31.039
<v Speaker 1>passive investor, meaning that he will advocate for changes. What

0:01:31.120 --> 0:01:33.240
<v Speaker 1>influence do you think Musk will have on the platform?

0:01:33.319 --> 0:01:37.560
<v Speaker 1>How will Twitter change as a result of his board membership. Well,

0:01:37.600 --> 0:01:40.320
<v Speaker 1>I don't think anyone knows, and you know, there there

0:01:40.319 --> 0:01:42.560
<v Speaker 1>are a lot of predictions people could make. But one

0:01:42.600 --> 0:01:46.199
<v Speaker 1>thing that's particularly interesting is the possibility that he will

0:01:46.360 --> 0:01:52.640
<v Speaker 1>join Jack Dorsey and current CEO agerwal in promoting decentralized

0:01:52.760 --> 0:01:56.920
<v Speaker 1>models in you know, promoting ways to allow third parties

0:01:56.920 --> 0:02:00.600
<v Speaker 1>to come in and offer different content moderations systems on

0:02:00.640 --> 0:02:04.280
<v Speaker 1>top of Twitter or different content ranking systems, which would

0:02:04.280 --> 0:02:08.240
<v Speaker 1>be a really important ship that had happened. So Twitter's

0:02:08.280 --> 0:02:11.680
<v Speaker 1>Blue Sky project, which is this push for an open,

0:02:12.240 --> 0:02:16.240
<v Speaker 1>decentralized standard for social media that is funded by Twitter.

0:02:16.760 --> 0:02:19.480
<v Speaker 1>You know, is this something that you think Musk could

0:02:19.840 --> 0:02:25.040
<v Speaker 1>or would take on? And you know what specifically would

0:02:25.040 --> 0:02:29.160
<v Speaker 1>you be looking to change? Well, so the upside of

0:02:29.200 --> 0:02:32.080
<v Speaker 1>the project is that it would let Twitter users pick

0:02:32.200 --> 0:02:34.520
<v Speaker 1>the speech rules they want to live under. You know,

0:02:34.560 --> 0:02:37.720
<v Speaker 1>they could sign up for a Disney flavor, or a

0:02:37.800 --> 0:02:41.960
<v Speaker 1>church affiliated or Black Lives Matter affiliated flavor of the ranking,

0:02:42.240 --> 0:02:46.120
<v Speaker 1>or of the rules on harassment or violence or nudity.

0:02:46.480 --> 0:02:48.960
<v Speaker 1>So all of these things would allow Twitter to step

0:02:49.040 --> 0:02:52.440
<v Speaker 1>back from being the one gatekeeper that decides the speech

0:02:52.520 --> 0:02:55.600
<v Speaker 1>rules and bring in lots of different options for users.

0:02:55.880 --> 0:02:58.520
<v Speaker 1>So you can see Musk, who has talked about, you know,

0:02:58.560 --> 0:03:02.240
<v Speaker 1>open sourcing the algorithms and and is broadly interested in

0:03:02.320 --> 0:03:07.480
<v Speaker 1>decentralization liking that um. On the other hand, you can

0:03:07.520 --> 0:03:11.799
<v Speaker 1>see him liking consolidated control and preferring a world where

0:03:11.840 --> 0:03:14.680
<v Speaker 1>Twitter does set the rules. So I think you know,

0:03:14.760 --> 0:03:17.919
<v Speaker 1>it's it's a wait and see situation for sure. Could

0:03:17.960 --> 0:03:23.040
<v Speaker 1>this have repercussions for other social platforms like Facebook? Sure?

0:03:23.680 --> 0:03:26.200
<v Speaker 1>In a way, you can see Project Blue Sky, which

0:03:26.240 --> 0:03:30.080
<v Speaker 1>is about decentralizing rules, bringing in more decision makers and

0:03:30.120 --> 0:03:35.480
<v Speaker 1>more options for users, as like a counterpart of Facebook's

0:03:35.560 --> 0:03:40.760
<v Speaker 1>oversight Board. In both cases, it's platforms saying we're uneasy

0:03:40.920 --> 0:03:45.640
<v Speaker 1>being the deciders, especially on issues that divide the public

0:03:45.720 --> 0:03:47.760
<v Speaker 1>so much that somebody is going to be angry no

0:03:47.800 --> 0:03:49.840
<v Speaker 1>matter what we do, and so we would like to

0:03:50.040 --> 0:03:53.920
<v Speaker 1>hand that role to someone else. Facebook's answer was keep

0:03:53.960 --> 0:03:58.280
<v Speaker 1>it extremely centralized, funded with Facebook money, and build the

0:03:58.360 --> 0:04:02.720
<v Speaker 1>oversight board to decide cases. And Twitter's answer answer with

0:04:02.760 --> 0:04:07.280
<v Speaker 1>blues Styde potentially is to say, let's decentralize this, Let's

0:04:07.320 --> 0:04:09.760
<v Speaker 1>put lots of different people in charge and sort of

0:04:10.080 --> 0:04:13.000
<v Speaker 1>devolve control to the users that they can choose what

0:04:13.040 --> 0:04:16.440
<v Speaker 1>they want and move the costs, incidentally, of all this

0:04:16.720 --> 0:04:20.920
<v Speaker 1>content moderation out onto other competitors, so it's not sitting

0:04:20.960 --> 0:04:24.720
<v Speaker 1>with Twitter where it's very expensive and very difficult as

0:04:24.720 --> 0:04:27.680
<v Speaker 1>part of their business. Right now, now, the biggest, perhaps

0:04:27.720 --> 0:04:31.080
<v Speaker 1>most existential question is what could this mean for free

0:04:31.120 --> 0:04:34.719
<v Speaker 1>speech on Twitter and in general. Take a listen to

0:04:35.240 --> 0:04:38.719
<v Speaker 1>a professor Jennifer Grigel from Syracuse University when I asked

0:04:38.720 --> 0:04:42.560
<v Speaker 1>her how this could change how Twitter handles free speech.

0:04:43.839 --> 0:04:47.240
<v Speaker 1>This really isn't about free speech. If anything, Twitter has

0:04:47.279 --> 0:04:50.160
<v Speaker 1>just become a little bit more about you on speech.

0:04:50.680 --> 0:04:54.080
<v Speaker 1>You just ball a large portion of this company and

0:04:54.160 --> 0:04:57.839
<v Speaker 1>gets the kind of steer what happens there now. If anything,

0:04:58.480 --> 0:05:01.400
<v Speaker 1>he's figured out that this is a oracle platform. Maybe

0:05:01.440 --> 0:05:04.080
<v Speaker 1>he took some notes from Mark Zuckerberg and others that

0:05:04.720 --> 0:05:08.560
<v Speaker 1>you need to have some influence over a platform. Daphne

0:05:08.560 --> 0:05:11.320
<v Speaker 1>do you think this is more about Elon's speech and

0:05:11.320 --> 0:05:15.640
<v Speaker 1>and and and how could this influence future moderation efforts

0:05:15.680 --> 0:05:19.840
<v Speaker 1>at Twitter? Well, it would be more about Elon speech

0:05:19.920 --> 0:05:22.160
<v Speaker 1>if we stay in the world of Twitter being a

0:05:22.160 --> 0:05:26.080
<v Speaker 1>single centralized point of control over the rules that are

0:05:26.120 --> 0:05:29.280
<v Speaker 1>imposed on users and their speech. So if we don't

0:05:29.360 --> 0:05:32.360
<v Speaker 1>go in this decentralized direction that we've been talking about

0:05:32.440 --> 0:05:34.359
<v Speaker 1>and that Jack Dorsey has been talking about for a

0:05:34.400 --> 0:05:37.920
<v Speaker 1>few years, um, and instead there's just one decider in

0:05:38.000 --> 0:05:43.760
<v Speaker 1>the middle, then obviously Elon Musk's roll there is really important. Um.

0:05:43.839 --> 0:05:47.640
<v Speaker 1>But I don't think we should foresee a world where

0:05:48.000 --> 0:05:52.320
<v Speaker 1>Twitter becomes, you know, a free speech mosh pit, free

0:05:52.320 --> 0:05:56.000
<v Speaker 1>for all, because they're not going to make money that way.

0:05:56.080 --> 0:05:58.760
<v Speaker 1>You know, if if you get onto Twitter and you

0:05:58.839 --> 0:06:02.680
<v Speaker 1>can't help seeing a bunch of racist comments or bullying

0:06:02.920 --> 0:06:05.680
<v Speaker 1>or spam or you know, all of these things that

0:06:05.839 --> 0:06:09.160
<v Speaker 1>users don't like and that advertisers don't like, um, that

0:06:09.720 --> 0:06:12.320
<v Speaker 1>is not a way to retain users or or to

0:06:12.440 --> 0:06:15.000
<v Speaker 1>be profitable. So I don't think we should imagine a

0:06:15.040 --> 0:06:18.320
<v Speaker 1>world where if anything goes on Twitter, it's you know,

0:06:18.720 --> 0:06:21.720
<v Speaker 1>at most a world where Twitter still imposes its own

0:06:21.800 --> 0:06:25.400
<v Speaker 1>rules but they're more influenced by Elon Musk. But possibly

0:06:25.480 --> 0:06:28.920
<v Speaker 1>this really interesting other direction where Twitter steps back and

0:06:28.960 --> 0:06:31.279
<v Speaker 1>gives users a choice. You know, you can choose to

0:06:31.279 --> 0:06:33.400
<v Speaker 1>live under Twitter's rules, or you can choose to live

0:06:33.480 --> 0:06:36.640
<v Speaker 1>under some other rules, which brings me to the question

0:06:36.839 --> 0:06:39.800
<v Speaker 1>of Donald Trump and could just open the door to

0:06:40.240 --> 0:06:43.960
<v Speaker 1>president former President Trump coming back to Twitter after being

0:06:44.080 --> 0:06:47.960
<v Speaker 1>permanently banned. I've asked Ned Siegel, the CFO, this question

0:06:48.320 --> 0:06:51.119
<v Speaker 1>several times over the last year. Is there a path

0:06:51.640 --> 0:06:53.640
<v Speaker 1>for Trump to come back? Take a listen to what

0:06:53.640 --> 0:06:57.840
<v Speaker 1>he's had to say. One somebody is removed from Twitter,

0:06:58.440 --> 0:07:00.760
<v Speaker 1>there isn't a path for them to come back. Uh.

0:07:00.800 --> 0:07:03.400
<v Speaker 1>And that's true for public officials, is true for anybody

0:07:03.400 --> 0:07:08.479
<v Speaker 1>else who uses the service as well. Now, Trump, in

0:07:08.760 --> 0:07:12.880
<v Speaker 1>a lawsuit against Twitter back in January, said Twitter has

0:07:12.920 --> 0:07:17.640
<v Speaker 1>increasingly engaged in impermissible censorship. The immediacy of its threat

0:07:17.680 --> 0:07:20.640
<v Speaker 1>to users and potentially every citizen's right to free speech

0:07:20.680 --> 0:07:25.960
<v Speaker 1>cannot be overstated. Twitter censorship results in a chilling effect

0:07:25.960 --> 0:07:30.480
<v Speaker 1>on our nation's pressing political, medical, social, and cultural discussions.

0:07:31.200 --> 0:07:34.200
<v Speaker 1>Does former President Trump have a point? And do you

0:07:34.240 --> 0:07:37.360
<v Speaker 1>see Elon Musk coming back? You know, could they reopen

0:07:37.400 --> 0:07:39.960
<v Speaker 1>this question of whether he should be on the platform. Well,

0:07:40.080 --> 0:07:43.400
<v Speaker 1>former President Trump does not have a legal point as

0:07:43.440 --> 0:07:48.280
<v Speaker 1>a legal argument. This lawsuit is nonsense because private platforms

0:07:48.400 --> 0:07:51.480
<v Speaker 1>don't owe you First Amendment protection the way that the

0:07:51.520 --> 0:07:54.080
<v Speaker 1>government does. And courts have said this over and over

0:07:54.120 --> 0:07:57.640
<v Speaker 1>again in cases very much like this Trump lawsuits. Um.

0:07:57.760 --> 0:08:00.320
<v Speaker 1>But as a matter of public policy and things that

0:08:00.360 --> 0:08:03.160
<v Speaker 1>we care about, Uh, is it a problem that there

0:08:03.160 --> 0:08:05.800
<v Speaker 1>are a small handful of giant companies that really have

0:08:06.120 --> 0:08:09.119
<v Speaker 1>a chokehold over what speech and information we can share

0:08:09.200 --> 0:08:12.040
<v Speaker 1>and see? Yes, you know, of course people are worried

0:08:12.040 --> 0:08:15.400
<v Speaker 1>about that. And so you know, I can imagine a

0:08:15.440 --> 0:08:21.040
<v Speaker 1>future where Twitter's version of its content moderation continues to

0:08:21.160 --> 0:08:26.800
<v Speaker 1>have former President Trump band for life. But there are alternatives. Um,

0:08:26.960 --> 0:08:30.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, a lens on Twitter offered by some competitor

0:08:30.400 --> 0:08:32.760
<v Speaker 1>that does allow him to come back, and then users

0:08:32.760 --> 0:08:36.800
<v Speaker 1>can choose which of those universes they want to live in. Interesting.

0:08:36.920 --> 0:08:39.520
<v Speaker 1>So you think that Twitter could find a middle ground

0:08:39.559 --> 0:08:42.800
<v Speaker 1>here with when it comes to President Trump. Well, so

0:08:43.240 --> 0:08:48.080
<v Speaker 1>imagine you know, their users can choose from fifty different

0:08:48.080 --> 0:08:51.440
<v Speaker 1>flavors of competing content moderation services built on top of

0:08:51.440 --> 0:08:56.440
<v Speaker 1>Twitter um. One version of that is an entirely federated system,

0:08:56.520 --> 0:08:59.880
<v Speaker 1>meaning there is no centralized control, kind of like math

0:09:00.000 --> 0:09:02.840
<v Speaker 1>stood on now, and so you know, in that version,

0:09:03.000 --> 0:09:06.520
<v Speaker 1>anyone can build a system where President Trump does come back,

0:09:06.559 --> 0:09:08.400
<v Speaker 1>and it's just a question of whether users want to

0:09:08.440 --> 0:09:11.880
<v Speaker 1>sign up for that. I think what's more plausible as

0:09:11.920 --> 0:09:14.480
<v Speaker 1>a future development with Project Blue Sky is a sort

0:09:14.480 --> 0:09:17.640
<v Speaker 1>of hub and spoke model where Twitter does take some

0:09:17.760 --> 0:09:20.320
<v Speaker 1>things down at the center, like things that are illegal

0:09:20.559 --> 0:09:23.920
<v Speaker 1>or honoring d m c A notices, um, and then

0:09:24.080 --> 0:09:28.000
<v Speaker 1>what left goes out to the you know, the competing

0:09:28.120 --> 0:09:32.199
<v Speaker 1>offerers of content moderation services, and they can decide among

0:09:32.480 --> 0:09:34.920
<v Speaker 1>among those things that are left. So more like how

0:09:34.920 --> 0:09:39.040
<v Speaker 1>Reddit does some centralized content moderation, but then most of

0:09:39.040 --> 0:09:42.120
<v Speaker 1>the decisions are made by different subreddits, you know, applying

0:09:42.200 --> 0:09:46.640
<v Speaker 1>their own different policies. You know. So Twitter could choose

0:09:46.679 --> 0:09:49.079
<v Speaker 1>to say, you know, we're going to take down all

0:09:49.120 --> 0:09:51.360
<v Speaker 1>the illegal stuff at the center so no one can

0:09:51.400 --> 0:09:55.040
<v Speaker 1>see it. And also some things violate our own policies

0:09:55.400 --> 0:09:58.400
<v Speaker 1>so badly that we're also going to keep that down

0:09:58.440 --> 0:10:01.840
<v Speaker 1>permanently for all of that, you know, competing flavors of

0:10:01.880 --> 0:10:05.040
<v Speaker 1>content moderation but I just think that would be a

0:10:05.280 --> 0:10:10.480
<v Speaker 1>step one flavors. We'll see if Twitter moves in that direction.

0:10:10.640 --> 0:10:13.640
<v Speaker 1>Daphne Keller, director of the Program and Platform Regulation at

0:10:13.640 --> 0:10:17.880
<v Speaker 1>the Stanford Hyper Policy Center. Thank you well. Elon Musk's

0:10:17.920 --> 0:10:21.760
<v Speaker 1>swift ascent from Twitter shareholder board member could catch the

0:10:21.760 --> 0:10:23.559
<v Speaker 1>eye of the SEC in this at a time when

0:10:23.559 --> 0:10:26.560
<v Speaker 1>the Commission is demanding more transparency from big investors and

0:10:26.679 --> 0:10:30.160
<v Speaker 1>ratcheting up fines for breaking rules. Here to talk about

0:10:30.200 --> 0:10:33.040
<v Speaker 1>that and more, Bloomberg's Matt Robinson, who covers the SEC

0:10:33.520 --> 0:10:35.560
<v Speaker 1>for US. So, Matt, is there any indication that the

0:10:35.640 --> 0:10:38.280
<v Speaker 1>SEC is looking at this yet? Not yet, But the

0:10:38.360 --> 0:10:41.280
<v Speaker 1>SEC is looking at Elon Musk and his brother for

0:10:41.840 --> 0:10:45.160
<v Speaker 1>insider trading or potential insider trading issues about a share

0:10:45.200 --> 0:10:48.040
<v Speaker 1>sale last fall. So uh, you know, as we know,

0:10:48.160 --> 0:10:51.360
<v Speaker 1>the SEC and Elon Musco go back, you know, quite

0:10:51.400 --> 0:10:54.720
<v Speaker 1>a few years now from teen with his infamous funding

0:10:54.760 --> 0:10:59.920
<v Speaker 1>secured tweet and the subsequent penalty and settlement which limits

0:11:00.120 --> 0:11:05.160
<v Speaker 1>ability to talk about his company on the platform. Now,

0:11:05.320 --> 0:11:08.080
<v Speaker 1>Elon Musk initially filed to be a passive investor. We

0:11:08.160 --> 0:11:10.360
<v Speaker 1>know now in the last twenty four hours he's changed

0:11:10.400 --> 0:11:12.880
<v Speaker 1>that to become an active investor. We also know he

0:11:12.960 --> 0:11:16.800
<v Speaker 1>started buying shares starting back in January. The CEO Twitter,

0:11:16.800 --> 0:11:18.960
<v Speaker 1>Paragua Agarwal, said that they had actually been talking for

0:11:19.080 --> 0:11:23.600
<v Speaker 1>weeks now, perhaps it could actually be months. What's significant

0:11:23.600 --> 0:11:25.960
<v Speaker 1>about that to you when it comes to the interest

0:11:26.000 --> 0:11:28.560
<v Speaker 1>of the SEC. So those are so the two different

0:11:28.559 --> 0:11:32.679
<v Speaker 1>filings that, um, you know big investors have to disclose. Um,

0:11:32.720 --> 0:11:34.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, we have a thirteen G, which is someone

0:11:34.360 --> 0:11:37.160
<v Speaker 1>who's taking a passive steak, someone who doesn't have any

0:11:37.200 --> 0:11:41.400
<v Speaker 1>interest in seeking any sort of business plans or changes,

0:11:41.760 --> 0:11:44.400
<v Speaker 1>and then the thirteen D, which is what he filed yesterday.

0:11:44.400 --> 0:11:48.080
<v Speaker 1>So there is room for from foreign investor to go

0:11:48.160 --> 0:11:50.800
<v Speaker 1>from a thirteen G, which is the you know, um,

0:11:50.920 --> 0:11:54.520
<v Speaker 1>the passive side, to an activist side. So, um, there

0:11:54.559 --> 0:11:58.040
<v Speaker 1>are so by updating that, that's that's fine. The issue

0:11:58.080 --> 0:12:01.920
<v Speaker 1>that Elon Musky may find himself into is that he, um,

0:12:01.960 --> 0:12:03.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, as soon as you hit five percent, you

0:12:03.920 --> 0:12:06.680
<v Speaker 1>have to disclose within ten calendar days, and it looks

0:12:06.679 --> 0:12:09.440
<v Speaker 1>like he may have missed that window. So that is

0:12:09.480 --> 0:12:12.960
<v Speaker 1>sort of a technical violation that he could see see

0:12:13.000 --> 0:12:15.720
<v Speaker 1>some issues, but the SEC is generally they don't really

0:12:15.760 --> 0:12:19.719
<v Speaker 1>bring those cases unless it's kind of repeated failures. How

0:12:19.760 --> 0:12:22.320
<v Speaker 1>fast can we see the SEC move on with move on,

0:12:22.559 --> 0:12:25.680
<v Speaker 1>move on this? Well, you know they it's obviously just happened.

0:12:25.720 --> 0:12:27.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean, if it has, if they haven't you know,

0:12:27.720 --> 0:12:31.120
<v Speaker 1>started an investigation in a couple of weeks, you know,

0:12:31.440 --> 0:12:34.120
<v Speaker 1>is its smooth sailing? It's it's certainly could be quick.

0:12:34.160 --> 0:12:37.679
<v Speaker 1>I mean, if you're back in eighteen you know, if

0:12:37.720 --> 0:12:39.920
<v Speaker 1>I remember correctly, it was like early August that he

0:12:40.120 --> 0:12:42.360
<v Speaker 1>brought the funny Security and at the end of September

0:12:42.600 --> 0:12:45.920
<v Speaker 1>the SEC suit elon Musk So, I mean, if there's um,

0:12:45.960 --> 0:12:48.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, the facts and and the certainly the motivation

0:12:48.800 --> 0:12:50.599
<v Speaker 1>there from the SEC if they feel like this is

0:12:50.640 --> 0:12:53.640
<v Speaker 1>an important case to bring that you know this is

0:12:53.640 --> 0:12:56.120
<v Speaker 1>going to show too too, mus get to other investors

0:12:56.160 --> 0:12:58.200
<v Speaker 1>that you know you have to take these sources of

0:12:58.200 --> 0:13:02.480
<v Speaker 1>disclosure rules. Um SERI slee and promptly all right, Bloomberg

0:13:02.520 --> 0:13:04.800
<v Speaker 1>Smott Robinson, who covers the SEC for us, thank you,

0:13:05.559 --> 0:13:09.600
<v Speaker 1>coming up, darks Rasha. He is pushing Uber closer to

0:13:09.640 --> 0:13:13.400
<v Speaker 1>becoming the go to travel app, adding long distance travel

0:13:13.440 --> 0:13:17.319
<v Speaker 1>like planes, trains, hotels. Will it work? Could Uber be

0:13:17.679 --> 0:13:21.720
<v Speaker 1>the next super app? We will explore next. This is Bloomberg.

0:13:33.400 --> 0:13:36.679
<v Speaker 1>Let's get to Uber's continued push to become a super app.

0:13:36.800 --> 0:13:39.520
<v Speaker 1>The ridehilling company planning to launch a pilot project in

0:13:39.520 --> 0:13:42.760
<v Speaker 1>the UK that will integrate offers from travel partners. That

0:13:42.760 --> 0:13:45.200
<v Speaker 1>means customers will soon be able to book long distance

0:13:45.280 --> 0:13:50.560
<v Speaker 1>travel on planes, trains, buses, even hotels. Bloombergs Jackie Delavlos

0:13:50.760 --> 0:13:53.880
<v Speaker 1>has more so, how exactly will this work, Jackie? From

0:13:53.920 --> 0:13:57.480
<v Speaker 1>a customer's perspective, it's going to be a one stop

0:13:57.520 --> 0:14:00.959
<v Speaker 1>shop for transportation. Now. While we were able to get

0:14:01.000 --> 0:14:03.840
<v Speaker 1>a cab to the airport, now when you're at the airport,

0:14:04.080 --> 0:14:06.960
<v Speaker 1>you know you can hail or book the next train

0:14:07.160 --> 0:14:09.560
<v Speaker 1>ride or your bus from whatever city you're going to.

0:14:09.720 --> 0:14:14.440
<v Speaker 1>It's really going to become a much more comprehensive travel hub.

0:14:14.720 --> 0:14:18.680
<v Speaker 1>Now for Uber, this is the next step in their

0:14:18.800 --> 0:14:23.880
<v Speaker 1>super app strategy. This is not something that is completely new.

0:14:23.920 --> 0:14:27.480
<v Speaker 1>They telegraphed this even, you know, back in ten dar

0:14:27.640 --> 0:14:31.280
<v Speaker 1>casra Shaw he had this big idea that it could

0:14:31.280 --> 0:14:34.160
<v Speaker 1>become a super app. And when you think about it,

0:14:34.160 --> 0:14:36.640
<v Speaker 1>it's not a concept that is very well known to

0:14:37.120 --> 0:14:41.680
<v Speaker 1>Westerners in particular, but in Asia it's huge. Uber has

0:14:41.720 --> 0:14:43.640
<v Speaker 1>a stake in Grab, which is one of the biggest

0:14:43.720 --> 0:14:46.720
<v Speaker 1>players and examples of a super app where you can

0:14:46.760 --> 0:14:49.240
<v Speaker 1>access payments, you can hail a ride, you can get

0:14:49.240 --> 0:14:51.680
<v Speaker 1>food delivery, all in one. So this is a major

0:14:51.800 --> 0:14:55.480
<v Speaker 1>step really jump starting those efforts for Uber. Now. You

0:14:55.560 --> 0:14:57.520
<v Speaker 1>and I just spent time with Dara Cosa Shaw. He

0:14:57.680 --> 0:15:00.440
<v Speaker 1>at shop Talk a couple of weeks ago, and he

0:15:00.880 --> 0:15:05.240
<v Speaker 1>talked about this vision to deliver the future of retail,

0:15:05.640 --> 0:15:08.280
<v Speaker 1>not just food. Take a listen to what he had

0:15:08.280 --> 0:15:13.280
<v Speaker 1>to say when I asked specifically about these super app ambitions.

0:15:13.280 --> 0:15:15.960
<v Speaker 1>So what we're doing essentially is building the largest local

0:15:16.000 --> 0:15:20.800
<v Speaker 1>commerce and transportation platform on Earth. UM the users, riders,

0:15:20.880 --> 0:15:24.200
<v Speaker 1>consumers get the ease of essentially being able to go

0:15:24.320 --> 0:15:29.359
<v Speaker 1>and go anywhere, get anything same I d same payments, etcetera.

0:15:29.400 --> 0:15:31.440
<v Speaker 1>We know the locations that you like to go or

0:15:31.640 --> 0:15:36.360
<v Speaker 1>restaurants that you love, Jackie. It all sounds good, But

0:15:36.440 --> 0:15:39.040
<v Speaker 1>how will this or could this help Uber's bottom line

0:15:39.120 --> 0:15:42.000
<v Speaker 1>or could it hurt Well, when you think about this

0:15:42.120 --> 0:15:46.600
<v Speaker 1>particular long distance travel move, the way it's going to

0:15:46.640 --> 0:15:50.200
<v Speaker 1>be done is by using online travel aggregators. So think

0:15:50.240 --> 0:15:52.400
<v Speaker 1>of an Expedia or a Booking They're the ones that

0:15:52.440 --> 0:15:55.680
<v Speaker 1>are actually booking the ticket, but Uber is taking a

0:15:55.800 --> 0:15:59.200
<v Speaker 1>cut out of that sale. It's a really high margin

0:15:59.680 --> 0:16:02.520
<v Speaker 1>tie of strategy where you know, they're not the ones

0:16:02.680 --> 0:16:05.280
<v Speaker 1>having the having to get that plane or the train,

0:16:05.440 --> 0:16:09.000
<v Speaker 1>the actual hardware. What they're doing is just facilitating this

0:16:09.000 --> 0:16:12.400
<v Speaker 1>this sale for customers that are already very engaged on

0:16:12.440 --> 0:16:14.840
<v Speaker 1>their app. When you think about the different ways that

0:16:14.960 --> 0:16:18.680
<v Speaker 1>Uber can tap people's lives, you know, you can book

0:16:18.720 --> 0:16:21.480
<v Speaker 1>a restaurant, take a ride to the restaurant, pay for

0:16:21.520 --> 0:16:26.240
<v Speaker 1>the meal. UH. The opportunity for growth is very, very significant.

0:16:26.680 --> 0:16:30.840
<v Speaker 1>So what does this mean for competition? You know, especially

0:16:30.880 --> 0:16:33.840
<v Speaker 1>given this is launching in the UK. Obviously there are

0:16:33.920 --> 0:16:39.320
<v Speaker 1>big travel competitors like Expedia Bookings. You know, what does

0:16:39.360 --> 0:16:42.320
<v Speaker 1>this mean for the rest of the industry For some

0:16:42.480 --> 0:16:46.600
<v Speaker 1>of its direct competitors. Let's take you know, rideshare Lift

0:16:46.680 --> 0:16:50.720
<v Speaker 1>for example. If this kind of a long distance rollout

0:16:50.800 --> 0:16:54.000
<v Speaker 1>were to reach North America, it would be a huge

0:16:54.040 --> 0:16:57.360
<v Speaker 1>blow for Lift, who doesn't have the kind of UH

0:16:57.560 --> 0:17:01.320
<v Speaker 1>cushion that Uber has with its food delivery business. And

0:17:01.440 --> 0:17:03.680
<v Speaker 1>also when you think about some of the marketplaces that

0:17:03.720 --> 0:17:07.080
<v Speaker 1>are also vye to keep their customers on their apps, longer.

0:17:07.280 --> 0:17:10.280
<v Speaker 1>Whether it's door Dash or insta cart, this is going

0:17:10.320 --> 0:17:13.359
<v Speaker 1>to be a significant challenge, especially if upers making it

0:17:13.359 --> 0:17:16.480
<v Speaker 1>easy to do all the things in the app, whether

0:17:16.640 --> 0:17:20.720
<v Speaker 1>it's you know, a ride or a meal, convenience items retail.

0:17:21.119 --> 0:17:24.119
<v Speaker 1>Uh so, I think it's rapid delivery. It's going to

0:17:24.240 --> 0:17:28.480
<v Speaker 1>really um you know up the ante for marketplaces and

0:17:28.960 --> 0:17:32.639
<v Speaker 1>rideshare rivals h to to find ways to keep customers

0:17:32.640 --> 0:17:34.880
<v Speaker 1>on the app. Alright, we'll be watching how this plays.

0:17:34.880 --> 0:17:46.119
<v Speaker 1>Applom works. Jackie Doagulos, thank you. She is one of

0:17:46.119 --> 0:17:49.199
<v Speaker 1>the most popular stars on Twitch with more than a

0:17:49.240 --> 0:17:53.040
<v Speaker 1>million followers. Meat iron Mouse. She not only plays some

0:17:53.040 --> 0:17:55.240
<v Speaker 1>of the most popular video games on the streaming site,

0:17:55.240 --> 0:17:58.960
<v Speaker 1>but also sings karaoke and cracks jokes to her many followers.

0:17:59.160 --> 0:18:00.919
<v Speaker 1>For more on the ride is of iron Mouse and

0:18:01.000 --> 0:18:04.720
<v Speaker 1>other v tubers, I'm joined by Bloomberg Cecilia Donastasio, who

0:18:04.720 --> 0:18:08.160
<v Speaker 1>covers the gaming industry for US. So who is Iron

0:18:08.200 --> 0:18:11.240
<v Speaker 1>Mouse and why has she gotten so popular? Iron Mouse

0:18:11.440 --> 0:18:15.720
<v Speaker 1>is an anonymous woman Puerto Rican woman who became very

0:18:15.760 --> 0:18:19.720
<v Speaker 1>popular on Twitch and on YouTube for live streaming herself

0:18:19.800 --> 0:18:25.280
<v Speaker 1>as a virtual anime character through motion capture technology. Iron

0:18:25.320 --> 0:18:28.399
<v Speaker 1>mouse kind of moves in front of a camera and

0:18:28.480 --> 0:18:32.199
<v Speaker 1>that gets fed through animation software and that is what

0:18:32.240 --> 0:18:34.159
<v Speaker 1>you see on screen. You see a v tuber or

0:18:34.280 --> 0:18:38.359
<v Speaker 1>virtual YouTuber. So what don't we know about the woman

0:18:38.400 --> 0:18:41.280
<v Speaker 1>behind this character. We don't know anything about the woman

0:18:41.280 --> 0:18:45.600
<v Speaker 1>behind this character, but um, she keeps herself anonymous just

0:18:45.880 --> 0:18:49.720
<v Speaker 1>to protect for her own safety. So talk to us

0:18:49.760 --> 0:18:52.760
<v Speaker 1>about the rise of v tubers and who else is

0:18:52.800 --> 0:18:57.240
<v Speaker 1>falling into the popular category. There are seventeen thousand v

0:18:57.359 --> 0:19:01.439
<v Speaker 1>tubers right now. Iron Mouse broke records, recently becoming the

0:19:01.480 --> 0:19:04.640
<v Speaker 1>most subscribed to woman on Twitch and the most popular

0:19:04.720 --> 0:19:08.280
<v Speaker 1>vituber on Twitch last month. But vtubing has become a

0:19:08.320 --> 0:19:10.800
<v Speaker 1>sensation over the last couple of years, with an over

0:19:10.840 --> 0:19:14.000
<v Speaker 1>four hundred and sixty seven percent increase between two thousand

0:19:14.000 --> 0:19:17.080
<v Speaker 1>and twenty and two thousand twenty one. And fans love it.

0:19:17.119 --> 0:19:20.119
<v Speaker 1>They love the feeling of interacting live with an anime character,

0:19:20.800 --> 0:19:23.080
<v Speaker 1>um or a person kind of presenting themselves as an

0:19:23.080 --> 0:19:26.400
<v Speaker 1>anime character. You know. Obviously we've talked a lot about

0:19:26.400 --> 0:19:29.520
<v Speaker 1>the rise of YouTubers and the kind of money they

0:19:29.560 --> 0:19:31.440
<v Speaker 1>can make. I mean, is there a lot of money

0:19:31.440 --> 0:19:33.600
<v Speaker 1>to be made? Here are their careers to be made

0:19:33.600 --> 0:19:36.359
<v Speaker 1>here for a select few. There is money to be

0:19:36.400 --> 0:19:38.600
<v Speaker 1>made and there are careers to be had. There are

0:19:39.080 --> 0:19:42.400
<v Speaker 1>UM some larger brands who have invested in v tubers,

0:19:42.440 --> 0:19:47.080
<v Speaker 1>particularly in Japanese vitubers. Companies like Sega have been involved

0:19:47.480 --> 0:19:51.560
<v Speaker 1>UM in sort of helping sponsor companies. The first v tuber,

0:19:51.760 --> 0:19:55.879
<v Speaker 1>Kazuna ai UM has done enormous deals with even like

0:19:55.920 --> 0:20:00.919
<v Speaker 1>the Japanese Tourism agency UM. But generally king it is

0:20:01.280 --> 0:20:04.040
<v Speaker 1>a competitive field right now, and only the top people

0:20:04.040 --> 0:20:06.000
<v Speaker 1>with the best technology. You're going to succeed on the

0:20:06.040 --> 0:20:11.120
<v Speaker 1>level of Iron Mouse House, all right, Cecilia Donastasio. Fascinating.

0:20:11.160 --> 0:20:14.320
<v Speaker 1>We'll have to try to learn more details about Iron Mouse.

0:20:14.320 --> 0:20:16.720
<v Speaker 1>Thank you for sharing that. Coming up, they just raised

0:20:16.760 --> 0:20:19.639
<v Speaker 1>nearly two billion dollars. Looking at that big on tech.

0:20:19.720 --> 0:20:24.399
<v Speaker 1>My exclusive conversation with lead Edge Capitals Mitchell green Up. Next,

0:20:36.080 --> 0:20:38.680
<v Speaker 1>Welcome back to Bloomberg Technology. I'm Emily Check in San Francisco.

0:20:39.040 --> 0:20:42.359
<v Speaker 1>What goes up must come down, right My next guest

0:20:42.359 --> 0:20:44.760
<v Speaker 1>thinks tech valuations have gotten ahead of themselves and it

0:20:44.800 --> 0:20:47.080
<v Speaker 1>has launched a new fund to put new money to

0:20:47.160 --> 0:20:50.760
<v Speaker 1>work in this rapidly changing macro environment. Joining me now

0:20:50.840 --> 0:20:54.480
<v Speaker 1>for more. Founding partner of lead Edge Capital, Mitchell Green. Mitch,

0:20:54.520 --> 0:20:58.280
<v Speaker 1>great to have you back with us. So how do

0:20:58.320 --> 0:21:01.960
<v Speaker 1>you think valuations are high right now? Are they too high?

0:21:02.119 --> 0:21:05.560
<v Speaker 1>And what's next? Thanks? I only thanks to much for

0:21:05.600 --> 0:21:11.640
<v Speaker 1>happing me on. Are we talking public or private company evaluations? Both? Both? Um?

0:21:11.680 --> 0:21:14.920
<v Speaker 1>So we look at me. Anybody watching the markets has

0:21:14.920 --> 0:21:19.200
<v Speaker 1>obviously seen that, especially in the software internet world, UM,

0:21:19.600 --> 0:21:23.520
<v Speaker 1>public evaluations have come down, you know, fairly dramatically. Um,

0:21:23.600 --> 0:21:25.959
<v Speaker 1>You wouldn't know what in the induscry has given just

0:21:26.000 --> 0:21:28.280
<v Speaker 1>how much of the induscry has weighted towards like you know,

0:21:28.320 --> 0:21:31.440
<v Speaker 1>the large camp companies like Apple and you know, um,

0:21:31.480 --> 0:21:34.119
<v Speaker 1>you know Microsoft and Facebook and Google and stuff like that.

0:21:34.200 --> 0:21:37.520
<v Speaker 1>But but underneath those, you know, companies like Snowflake or

0:21:37.560 --> 0:21:41.040
<v Speaker 1>Toast or you know Acta or you know, these companies

0:21:41.040 --> 0:21:44.720
<v Speaker 1>have come down hugely dramatically. And you know, public companies

0:21:44.800 --> 0:21:48.840
<v Speaker 1>tend to you know, lead private company evaluations. And I

0:21:48.840 --> 0:21:51.119
<v Speaker 1>think you will start to see and we're starting to

0:21:51.160 --> 0:21:55.199
<v Speaker 1>see private company evaluations to climb. Um. You've had a

0:21:55.240 --> 0:21:58.239
<v Speaker 1>lot of crossover hedge funds that had entered that had

0:21:58.280 --> 0:22:00.320
<v Speaker 1>been into the space over the last five years, and

0:22:00.400 --> 0:22:02.360
<v Speaker 1>you know we're looking at some large deals right now.

0:22:02.440 --> 0:22:05.200
<v Speaker 1>That is you know, six months ago, it would have

0:22:05.240 --> 0:22:07.520
<v Speaker 1>been kind of swarmed easily, you know, fifty sixty million

0:22:07.520 --> 0:22:10.680
<v Speaker 1>dollar revenue companies that would have been swarmed by a

0:22:10.760 --> 0:22:14.080
<v Speaker 1>crossoverpublic investors. And I think in this deal there's like

0:22:14.160 --> 0:22:16.600
<v Speaker 1>one looking at it, So it should be a good din.

0:22:17.200 --> 0:22:20.680
<v Speaker 1>Depressed valuations and less competition should be a good time

0:22:20.760 --> 0:22:24.600
<v Speaker 1>to you know, uh deploy money. Right, So how do

0:22:24.640 --> 0:22:28.000
<v Speaker 1>you plan to put this new one nine five billion

0:22:28.040 --> 0:22:31.720
<v Speaker 1>dollars to work? Yeah? So UM s any way, we

0:22:31.760 --> 0:22:34.000
<v Speaker 1>have been UM for many, many years. You know, we

0:22:34.119 --> 0:22:38.919
<v Speaker 1>deployed our last fund, UM nine million dollar fund in

0:22:39.080 --> 0:22:41.760
<v Speaker 1>like fifteen months, and so you know we want this

0:22:41.840 --> 0:22:43.600
<v Speaker 1>fund to take you know two and a half to

0:22:43.720 --> 0:22:45.639
<v Speaker 1>three years, two and a half years, three or to

0:22:45.760 --> 0:22:49.719
<v Speaker 1>three years to invest. And so UM continuing to do

0:22:49.760 --> 0:22:53.399
<v Speaker 1>what we do. You know, we're primarily uh Western European

0:22:54.160 --> 0:22:58.280
<v Speaker 1>uh you know, UM North American investors. We've done some

0:22:58.320 --> 0:23:01.040
<v Speaker 1>stuff in Asia over the year as companies like Aunt

0:23:01.160 --> 0:23:03.200
<v Speaker 1>or Bite Dance, Sarah Ali Babbo Group, we were early

0:23:03.200 --> 0:23:07.040
<v Speaker 1>investors in, but primarily US and Western European and Israeli

0:23:07.080 --> 0:23:11.959
<v Speaker 1>based software, internet companies and fintech companies. So you know,

0:23:12.040 --> 0:23:15.159
<v Speaker 1>when you when you look at valuations, are are you

0:23:15.280 --> 0:23:19.440
<v Speaker 1>changing your own bar in terms of what is reasonable?

0:23:19.520 --> 0:23:21.320
<v Speaker 1>And do you think more broadly, we're just gonna see

0:23:21.320 --> 0:23:25.440
<v Speaker 1>a lot of air get let out of the balloon. Yeah,

0:23:25.480 --> 0:23:29.880
<v Speaker 1>So since we our biggest mistakes, to be clear, over

0:23:29.920 --> 0:23:37.640
<v Speaker 1>the last five ten years was UM not predicting multiple expansion. UM.

0:23:37.960 --> 0:23:40.639
<v Speaker 1>Had we we would have made our LPs billions of

0:23:40.720 --> 0:23:43.040
<v Speaker 1>dollars more than we've made. We've done really well, but

0:23:43.080 --> 0:23:46.280
<v Speaker 1>we would have made a lot more UM. And you know,

0:23:46.320 --> 0:23:49.639
<v Speaker 1>look the way we the way we mob way we

0:23:49.680 --> 0:23:52.600
<v Speaker 1>make investments is we build five year models and this

0:23:52.640 --> 0:23:54.200
<v Speaker 1>is this is new, different today that it was five

0:23:54.280 --> 0:23:58.400
<v Speaker 1>years ago, and we slapped a reasonable you know, earnings

0:23:58.400 --> 0:24:01.840
<v Speaker 1>and revenue multiple on them and and discount back. Um.

0:24:01.840 --> 0:24:03.800
<v Speaker 1>There were a bunch of deals getting down over the

0:24:03.840 --> 0:24:06.520
<v Speaker 1>last twelve you know, starting kind of like there are

0:24:06.520 --> 0:24:09.800
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of deals I got done in one that

0:24:10.160 --> 0:24:13.960
<v Speaker 1>we could not figure out how people were underwriting these

0:24:14.280 --> 0:24:18.560
<v Speaker 1>these these valuations. Was when we stuck in our exit multiples,

0:24:18.560 --> 0:24:20.960
<v Speaker 1>which we thought were reasonable based on historical averages, Like

0:24:21.000 --> 0:24:24.200
<v Speaker 1>we just couldn't get there at all, um, And it's

0:24:24.240 --> 0:24:26.359
<v Speaker 1>just we just you know, we kind of use a

0:24:26.400 --> 0:24:30.560
<v Speaker 1>historical average multiple to excess stuff and we'll continue to

0:24:30.640 --> 0:24:32.720
<v Speaker 1>do that. And so I think what's interesting is it

0:24:32.800 --> 0:24:35.680
<v Speaker 1>in fund five we just raised Fund six. Um, we've

0:24:35.720 --> 0:24:38.080
<v Speaker 1>only done one or two deals in the Bay Area,

0:24:38.400 --> 0:24:40.000
<v Speaker 1>and a lot of our deals were just some like

0:24:40.119 --> 0:24:44.679
<v Speaker 1>random other places around the world. Um, you know, in Arbor, Michigan.

0:24:44.760 --> 0:24:46.680
<v Speaker 1>It was one of our biggest investments in Fund five.

0:24:47.240 --> 0:24:49.040
<v Speaker 1>We just thought you got better valuations there. It's not

0:24:49.040 --> 0:24:51.360
<v Speaker 1>because we don't like stuff on the coast. I think

0:24:51.359 --> 0:24:53.720
<v Speaker 1>in Fund six you will see us do more stuff

0:24:53.800 --> 0:24:56.600
<v Speaker 1>on the coasts, just because I think valuations are getting

0:24:56.640 --> 0:25:00.960
<v Speaker 1>to be more reasonable now. Online payments company Fast just

0:25:01.119 --> 0:25:04.280
<v Speaker 1>close shop yesterday saying they simply ran out of money.

0:25:04.320 --> 0:25:07.560
<v Speaker 1>Are we gonna see this happen more often? I'm sure

0:25:07.600 --> 0:25:11.320
<v Speaker 1>you will. So, yes, I'm sure you will. We have

0:25:11.600 --> 0:25:15.959
<v Speaker 1>this one criteria that is super important to us called

0:25:16.440 --> 0:25:20.680
<v Speaker 1>capital efficiency. And it's like our version of return on equity.

0:25:20.720 --> 0:25:23.000
<v Speaker 1>It's like the very dumb persons and our views return

0:25:23.040 --> 0:25:25.720
<v Speaker 1>on equity. Um, it's not like based in scientific fact.

0:25:25.760 --> 0:25:29.200
<v Speaker 1>But what it is is is it are your revenues today,

0:25:29.520 --> 0:25:32.760
<v Speaker 1>are your recurring revenues today or your annual recurring revenue

0:25:32.760 --> 0:25:37.560
<v Speaker 1>are are greater or equal to the amount of money

0:25:38.000 --> 0:25:40.760
<v Speaker 1>you've burned since day one of the business. Now, maybe

0:25:40.760 --> 0:25:42.680
<v Speaker 1>you've raised a bunch of money, but if it's sitting

0:25:42.680 --> 0:25:45.520
<v Speaker 1>in the bank, don't blame the entrepreneur. So, in other words,

0:25:45.800 --> 0:25:48.080
<v Speaker 1>the world, the world is littered with like thirty million

0:25:48.080 --> 0:25:50.919
<v Speaker 1>dollar revenue companies growing fast that have burned like a

0:25:50.960 --> 0:25:53.720
<v Speaker 1>hundred million dollars to get there. But what we want

0:25:53.720 --> 0:25:56.280
<v Speaker 1>to find the companies that are like thirty million of

0:25:56.320 --> 0:26:00.359
<v Speaker 1>revenue that have burned like ten million dollars to get there,

0:26:00.400 --> 0:26:03.800
<v Speaker 1>because those are companies that you know are just not

0:26:03.880 --> 0:26:08.359
<v Speaker 1>going to like fall off a cliff if times get tough. Um.

0:26:08.400 --> 0:26:10.520
<v Speaker 1>They also just if you can grow fast and not

0:26:10.600 --> 0:26:13.600
<v Speaker 1>burn much money, you've got a good business. So it's

0:26:13.600 --> 0:26:16.359
<v Speaker 1>just like a simple like a check that and every

0:26:16.400 --> 0:26:19.440
<v Speaker 1>deal that we invest in, we we rate it. Is

0:26:19.480 --> 0:26:21.280
<v Speaker 1>it a capital efficient or not. Now, not all the

0:26:21.320 --> 0:26:24.199
<v Speaker 1>companies we've invested in our but the vast majority are

0:26:24.800 --> 0:26:27.000
<v Speaker 1>just What are your thoughts? What are your thoughts on

0:26:27.040 --> 0:26:29.400
<v Speaker 1>the crypto market? Where do you see hype and where

0:26:29.440 --> 0:26:34.240
<v Speaker 1>do you see opportunity. Well, I think it's a giant bubble. Um.

0:26:34.320 --> 0:26:39.119
<v Speaker 1>But we to be completely fair, we have not. Um,

0:26:39.280 --> 0:26:41.080
<v Speaker 1>we have not. We've looked at some of this stuff

0:26:41.080 --> 0:26:44.480
<v Speaker 1>in grypto more on, like the pis and shovels businesses,

0:26:44.600 --> 0:26:47.280
<v Speaker 1>like a business called chain analysis. We looked at early

0:26:47.400 --> 0:26:50.640
<v Speaker 1>we're not investors benchmark as an early investor. So where

0:26:50.640 --> 0:26:53.959
<v Speaker 1>do you see the giant bubble? I'll know the right

0:26:54.040 --> 0:26:58.800
<v Speaker 1>price for bitcoin is sixty seventy thousand, twenty tho or five.

0:26:59.520 --> 0:27:01.600
<v Speaker 1>I just of this when I have a lot of

0:27:01.960 --> 0:27:05.919
<v Speaker 1>random friends who know nothing about investing in telling me

0:27:06.000 --> 0:27:09.040
<v Speaker 1>it's easy to make money in crypto, Like that smells

0:27:09.040 --> 0:27:11.600
<v Speaker 1>bubble to me. I also Um, one of my buddies

0:27:11.600 --> 0:27:13.760
<v Speaker 1>who has better really early investor in crypto and made

0:27:13.760 --> 0:27:15.120
<v Speaker 1>a lot of money on it. And somebody I guess

0:27:15.160 --> 0:27:18.080
<v Speaker 1>I should like I should have listened to UM say

0:27:18.200 --> 0:27:20.760
<v Speaker 1>he's convinced that like every fraud ster in the world

0:27:20.880 --> 0:27:23.280
<v Speaker 1>is now in the crypto world, like like this stuff

0:27:23.359 --> 0:27:26.480
<v Speaker 1>is real and by if you believe that like crypto

0:27:26.560 --> 0:27:29.720
<v Speaker 1>crypto is the next like Internet, then you might see

0:27:29.760 --> 0:27:33.040
<v Speaker 1>a draw out of or but the stuff is real,

0:27:33.280 --> 0:27:34.720
<v Speaker 1>Like I I just think a lot of this stuff

0:27:34.760 --> 0:27:38.119
<v Speaker 1>is overhyped and like is not justified at all in

0:27:38.640 --> 0:27:42.679
<v Speaker 1>um in you know, in fundamental fundamental investing. But I

0:27:42.680 --> 0:27:44.320
<v Speaker 1>do think it's real. I do think it's here to say,

0:27:44.800 --> 0:27:47.520
<v Speaker 1>one really interesting thing about crypto is it's like to like,

0:27:48.160 --> 0:27:51.560
<v Speaker 1>it's really volatile. So I was reading recently what I

0:27:51.600 --> 0:27:54.840
<v Speaker 1>saw that like Tesla was enabling you at one point

0:27:54.880 --> 0:27:57.119
<v Speaker 1>to be able to pay for Tesla's in bitcoin. I

0:27:57.119 --> 0:27:58.840
<v Speaker 1>thought that was like super cool. You could take a doubt,

0:27:58.880 --> 0:28:00.520
<v Speaker 1>you could take a currency and use it for an

0:28:00.520 --> 0:28:04.600
<v Speaker 1>exchange of goods or services. The problem is is, like

0:28:05.440 --> 0:28:06.680
<v Speaker 1>and the reason they got rid of it, and why

0:28:06.680 --> 0:28:08.680
<v Speaker 1>I think you haven't seen Amazon and other big weakdail

0:28:08.760 --> 0:28:11.000
<v Speaker 1>or start to accept it is these currencies are just

0:28:11.040 --> 0:28:14.879
<v Speaker 1>too volatile. Like I think there's been like something like

0:28:15.160 --> 0:28:20.840
<v Speaker 1>ten days where bitcoin is moved like in a day,

0:28:20.880 --> 0:28:24.000
<v Speaker 1>Like the biggest US dollar move ever like a U

0:28:24.080 --> 0:28:26.439
<v Speaker 1>S dour Euro move ever has been like one and

0:28:26.440 --> 0:28:28.760
<v Speaker 1>a half percent, and it's happened like five times. So

0:28:28.800 --> 0:28:31.080
<v Speaker 1>these things are just too volatile right now. But I

0:28:31.119 --> 0:28:36.360
<v Speaker 1>do think they're real. Yeah, all right, interesting little monologue there.

0:28:36.480 --> 0:28:40.240
<v Speaker 1>Richell Green, founding partner at lead Edge capital some strong opinions.

0:28:40.240 --> 0:28:43.560
<v Speaker 1>We'll see how you put your money to work. Thank you. Meantime,

0:28:43.800 --> 0:28:47.320
<v Speaker 1>billionaire crypto investor Michael Novegrat says that once the FED

0:28:47.440 --> 0:28:51.160
<v Speaker 1>takes a pause, Bitcoin could take off again, or in

0:28:51.240 --> 0:28:54.760
<v Speaker 1>his words, bitcoin goes to the moon. Novograts leads Galaxy

0:28:54.800 --> 0:28:59.200
<v Speaker 1>Digital Holdings at the Bitcoin conference in Miami. Novograts reiterator

0:28:59.240 --> 0:29:02.280
<v Speaker 1>to call that bit and will eventually hit a price

0:29:02.400 --> 0:29:05.400
<v Speaker 1>of one million dollars. It was trading today at a

0:29:05.440 --> 0:29:21.800
<v Speaker 1>little over forty four thousand. He really truly understands the

0:29:21.880 --> 0:29:25.760
<v Speaker 1>value of cryptocurrency, whether it be uh, you know, bitcoin

0:29:25.920 --> 0:29:29.680
<v Speaker 1>or doge coin. He has and he knows the value

0:29:29.720 --> 0:29:31.920
<v Speaker 1>of open source network. So what I think is going

0:29:32.000 --> 0:29:34.960
<v Speaker 1>to be interesting is is he going to bring these

0:29:35.000 --> 0:29:38.840
<v Speaker 1>elements of the crypto world, these anti censorship not elements,

0:29:38.840 --> 0:29:42.080
<v Speaker 1>the open source elements and allow for a way for

0:29:42.200 --> 0:29:46.560
<v Speaker 1>new people to come in and maybe import their own algorithm.

0:29:47.360 --> 0:29:50.800
<v Speaker 1>H Time now for our crypto report. That was the

0:29:50.840 --> 0:29:53.800
<v Speaker 1>Blockchain Associations Kristin Smith saying it's a good thing for

0:29:53.840 --> 0:29:57.800
<v Speaker 1>Twitter that Elon Musk is now on board this day three,

0:29:58.040 --> 0:29:59.880
<v Speaker 1>how of this developing story and I want to dig

0:29:59.880 --> 0:30:02.680
<v Speaker 1>a to it all with our crypto Contributornelli Bostick. Jan

0:30:02.760 --> 0:30:05.720
<v Speaker 1>Ali would love to hear how the crypto community is

0:30:05.760 --> 0:30:09.520
<v Speaker 1>digesting Elon Musk joining the board of Twitter, given he's

0:30:09.520 --> 0:30:13.320
<v Speaker 1>such He's been such a loud figure in the crypto community.

0:30:13.400 --> 0:30:17.160
<v Speaker 1>There's a huge crypto community on Twitter, and the future

0:30:17.240 --> 0:30:21.520
<v Speaker 1>of Twitter could be more decentralized. Yeah, it was interesting

0:30:21.560 --> 0:30:23.880
<v Speaker 1>to hear christ and Smith talk about it from the

0:30:23.920 --> 0:30:27.800
<v Speaker 1>decentralized social network standpoint, because you could also emily think

0:30:27.840 --> 0:30:31.520
<v Speaker 1>about it from a commerce standpoint. Remember, Twitter has already

0:30:31.520 --> 0:30:34.600
<v Speaker 1>started to integrate pieces of the Lightning Network here to

0:30:34.680 --> 0:30:37.840
<v Speaker 1>be able to make some payments possible via the platform

0:30:37.920 --> 0:30:40.440
<v Speaker 1>through the Lightning Network, which is obviously a very popular

0:30:40.520 --> 0:30:44.240
<v Speaker 1>project when it comes to bitcoin and payment transfers. But

0:30:44.480 --> 0:30:48.240
<v Speaker 1>the idea of decentralizing social media, there are a lot

0:30:48.240 --> 0:30:50.800
<v Speaker 1>of projects out there that people try to use when

0:30:50.800 --> 0:30:54.760
<v Speaker 1>it comes to media and decentralization, but they're still in

0:30:54.880 --> 0:30:57.120
<v Speaker 1>early days. Now. The question is can Twitter play a

0:30:57.160 --> 0:31:00.160
<v Speaker 1>bigger role in the space? Alright, Janel I say with us,

0:31:00.200 --> 0:31:01.400
<v Speaker 1>I want to bring in our next guest who is

0:31:01.480 --> 0:31:06.880
<v Speaker 1>joining us live from the Bitcoino conference in Miami, Pascal

0:31:07.040 --> 0:31:10.680
<v Speaker 1>go taste, CEO and chairman of the crypto security startup Ledger.

0:31:10.720 --> 0:31:12.640
<v Speaker 1>Before we dig in, Pascal, I'd love for you to

0:31:12.640 --> 0:31:15.920
<v Speaker 1>give us a flavor of bitcoino this year. Of course

0:31:15.920 --> 0:31:19.520
<v Speaker 1>it was big last year. Is it even bigger this year?

0:31:19.560 --> 0:31:23.520
<v Speaker 1>And what are people talking about? Yeah, this year is

0:31:23.600 --> 0:31:26.960
<v Speaker 1>very intense. Last year sadly I couldn't come because European

0:31:27.040 --> 0:31:28.920
<v Speaker 1>and so I couldn't I wasn't allowed to travel to

0:31:28.960 --> 0:31:31.880
<v Speaker 1>the US. But what I know from what people tell me,

0:31:31.920 --> 0:31:34.160
<v Speaker 1>it's like this year is even more intense of last year.

0:31:34.200 --> 0:31:37.080
<v Speaker 1>I think, you know, we're post pandemic, and so you know,

0:31:37.120 --> 0:31:39.160
<v Speaker 1>people are very happy to meet, like a meeting with

0:31:39.240 --> 0:31:42.360
<v Speaker 1>people that I've only met online so far, and right now,

0:31:42.440 --> 0:31:45.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's a very happy moment and you can

0:31:45.240 --> 0:31:48.800
<v Speaker 1>see that it's it's it's really going very strong with

0:31:48.960 --> 0:31:51.200
<v Speaker 1>a lot of support from you know, all communities that

0:31:51.200 --> 0:31:53.480
<v Speaker 1>are going towards bitcoins. So it's a great moment for bitcoin.

0:31:54.560 --> 0:31:58.120
<v Speaker 1>Ledger is known for its crypto hardware wallet and you're

0:31:58.120 --> 0:32:03.960
<v Speaker 1>out with a new one. How is this new better improved? Well,

0:32:03.960 --> 0:32:07.040
<v Speaker 1>it's just that you know, crypto currencies are evolving, and

0:32:07.080 --> 0:32:10.360
<v Speaker 1>so with the evolution of the protocols and the evolution

0:32:10.400 --> 0:32:12.360
<v Speaker 1>of like you know, the application that's seen on top

0:32:12.400 --> 0:32:16.200
<v Speaker 1>of protocols. You just need new hardware to enhance the experience.

0:32:16.240 --> 0:32:19.920
<v Speaker 1>And you know the Ledger nos plus is it's just

0:32:20.000 --> 0:32:21.920
<v Speaker 1>the result of that, Like you need norse, you need

0:32:21.920 --> 0:32:25.000
<v Speaker 1>more space, you know, you need more usability, and so

0:32:25.120 --> 0:32:27.400
<v Speaker 1>this is what's happening. So it's a product that was

0:32:27.480 --> 0:32:30.080
<v Speaker 1>long overdue. It's out now in the market, and there

0:32:30.120 --> 0:32:32.479
<v Speaker 1>will be many more products coming for Ledger in the future.

0:32:32.760 --> 0:32:35.040
<v Speaker 1>You know, there have been a lot more instances of

0:32:35.480 --> 0:32:37.640
<v Speaker 1>scams and hacks and the n f T and in

0:32:37.720 --> 0:32:42.840
<v Speaker 1>the DeFi space. How is Ledger attracking attacking? What's happening here?

0:32:43.200 --> 0:32:46.240
<v Speaker 1>And can you keep up with the technology that hackers

0:32:46.280 --> 0:32:51.280
<v Speaker 1>are using to to get into new spaces? Yes, of course,

0:32:51.320 --> 0:32:53.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean you know hikers are always hiking in exactly

0:32:53.440 --> 0:32:55.880
<v Speaker 1>the same way. You know, the problem is education in

0:32:55.920 --> 0:32:57.920
<v Speaker 1>the space, and you know people are understanding that they

0:32:58.000 --> 0:33:00.920
<v Speaker 1>need hardware security. Just think you're their assets. You know,

0:33:00.960 --> 0:33:04.360
<v Speaker 1>this is the fundamental truth of cryptocurrencies n f T.

0:33:04.480 --> 0:33:07.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean, anything that has a private key needs hardware security,

0:33:07.840 --> 0:33:10.360
<v Speaker 1>and so people need to learn and usually you know

0:33:10.440 --> 0:33:12.880
<v Speaker 1>they sometimes they learn the hardware and we're sorry for that.

0:33:12.960 --> 0:33:15.000
<v Speaker 1>But when it comes to n f T, you know,

0:33:15.120 --> 0:33:17.600
<v Speaker 1>NFT is treated as a first class citizen on all

0:33:17.680 --> 0:33:20.160
<v Speaker 1>Ledger products, and right now, depending on the n f

0:33:20.240 --> 0:33:23.200
<v Speaker 1>T collection, you've got between twenty five and four of

0:33:23.280 --> 0:33:25.600
<v Speaker 1>all n f T s that are already secured by Ledgers.

0:33:25.600 --> 0:33:27.520
<v Speaker 1>So I think we're doing our job and you know

0:33:27.560 --> 0:33:30.280
<v Speaker 1>the communities are responding well and using our product to

0:33:30.320 --> 0:33:32.840
<v Speaker 1>secure themselves. What do you think about competition in the

0:33:32.880 --> 0:33:35.160
<v Speaker 1>space also, you know there's news of Jack Dorsey and

0:33:35.200 --> 0:33:39.000
<v Speaker 1>the block working on hardware wallets. Are you nervous about

0:33:39.040 --> 0:33:41.200
<v Speaker 1>that and how does it change the competition when it

0:33:41.200 --> 0:33:45.800
<v Speaker 1>comes to the wallet space. Well, first, I think competition

0:33:46.040 --> 0:33:47.720
<v Speaker 1>is always welcome. You know, it means that there is

0:33:47.720 --> 0:33:49.680
<v Speaker 1>a space and it means that there is something there.

0:33:49.720 --> 0:33:52.480
<v Speaker 1>So you know, Ledger is is a very strong company

0:33:52.520 --> 0:33:56.320
<v Speaker 1>and there are a few hardware manufactus what it manufacturers

0:33:56.320 --> 0:33:57.840
<v Speaker 1>in the world. But you know the fact that Jack

0:33:57.880 --> 0:34:01.120
<v Speaker 1>Dorsey and blog and taking a taking this is good.

0:34:01.880 --> 0:34:04.080
<v Speaker 1>We we we know them, we talk to them, and

0:34:04.120 --> 0:34:06.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, I feel that what they're doing is actually

0:34:06.080 --> 0:34:10.759
<v Speaker 1>you know, something that is bitcoin mainly and within the

0:34:10.760 --> 0:34:12.880
<v Speaker 1>realm of what Block and Square doing. You know, I

0:34:12.920 --> 0:34:15.319
<v Speaker 1>think that Ledger is a much more holistic approach. Like

0:34:15.360 --> 0:34:18.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, we are hardware manufacturer. We care for every community.

0:34:18.960 --> 0:34:21.279
<v Speaker 1>We're not deedpoint only you know, of course, we're vary

0:34:21.360 --> 0:34:23.520
<v Speaker 1>from a bitcoin, but we are multi chain, and I

0:34:23.560 --> 0:34:26.960
<v Speaker 1>think the future is to hide away the complexity for users,

0:34:27.000 --> 0:34:28.800
<v Speaker 1>like they shouldn't worry so much about the chain, but

0:34:28.840 --> 0:34:31.719
<v Speaker 1>they should worry about you know, manufacturers like us worry

0:34:31.719 --> 0:34:34.399
<v Speaker 1>about the experience in the future. So we are very

0:34:34.440 --> 0:34:36.640
<v Speaker 1>focused on the journey of the user and making sure

0:34:36.640 --> 0:34:38.839
<v Speaker 1>that we support every community in crypto, and I think

0:34:39.160 --> 0:34:42.160
<v Speaker 1>that's where we're very different from everyone else. Well, speaking

0:34:42.160 --> 0:34:45.120
<v Speaker 1>of communities in crypto, there's a big one on Twitter.

0:34:45.320 --> 0:34:47.400
<v Speaker 1>And since we mentioned Jack Dorsey, I'm curious when you

0:34:47.440 --> 0:34:51.440
<v Speaker 1>think about Elon Musk joining the board of Twitter, given

0:34:51.480 --> 0:34:56.160
<v Speaker 1>his thoughts on decentralization and his own sort of role

0:34:56.440 --> 0:35:00.920
<v Speaker 1>in the crypto community, how does that strike you? You

0:35:00.960 --> 0:35:03.520
<v Speaker 1>know where what it strikes me the most is I think,

0:35:03.560 --> 0:35:05.279
<v Speaker 1>you know, I followed all of this and I think

0:35:05.280 --> 0:35:08.040
<v Speaker 1>Elon Musk is a beautiful troll and I think it's amazing,

0:35:08.080 --> 0:35:10.880
<v Speaker 1>and so I think he's taking a stance at freedom.

0:35:10.920 --> 0:35:12.960
<v Speaker 1>I think, you know, freedom is a concept here that

0:35:13.080 --> 0:35:17.279
<v Speaker 1>you know that Elon is standing behind, and uh, you know,

0:35:17.320 --> 0:35:21.080
<v Speaker 1>freedom of speech, and I think, of course is big.

0:35:21.160 --> 0:35:23.400
<v Speaker 1>The reason why it's big on discerent t realization is

0:35:23.400 --> 0:35:26.520
<v Speaker 1>because decentralization brings freedom to the people, and I think

0:35:26.920 --> 0:35:30.320
<v Speaker 1>freedom is really motivates in here. And actually freedom is

0:35:30.360 --> 0:35:32.360
<v Speaker 1>what ledgury is all about. Like we want to empower

0:35:32.440 --> 0:35:35.520
<v Speaker 1>people with tools so they can you know, we claim

0:35:35.640 --> 0:35:39.839
<v Speaker 1>their self sovereignty, like on you know, what they want

0:35:39.920 --> 0:35:42.600
<v Speaker 1>to own, whether it's a bitcoin, whether it's an n

0:35:42.640 --> 0:35:44.640
<v Speaker 1>f T or everything else that's going to go on

0:35:44.680 --> 0:35:47.320
<v Speaker 1>blockchain in the future. So I'm very aligned with you

0:35:47.560 --> 0:35:49.880
<v Speaker 1>much move and you know he roots for freedom and

0:35:49.880 --> 0:35:53.200
<v Speaker 1>so are we. So go on. You don't normally hear

0:35:53.239 --> 0:35:56.440
<v Speaker 1>the words beautiful and troll together. How can a troll

0:35:56.920 --> 0:36:00.200
<v Speaker 1>be beautiful? Oh, because I think it's a is an

0:36:00.200 --> 0:36:02.480
<v Speaker 1>Internet genius, Like every time you post something, he breaks

0:36:02.520 --> 0:36:05.000
<v Speaker 1>the internet. So but I think sometimes it's throwing. I

0:36:05.000 --> 0:36:08.000
<v Speaker 1>mean we're talking about like in being a promoter or crypto.

0:36:08.080 --> 0:36:10.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't think you know, being a promoto does is

0:36:11.280 --> 0:36:12.840
<v Speaker 1>you know the best that you can do for crypto,

0:36:12.920 --> 0:36:15.120
<v Speaker 1>but Elon is doing it. So you know, I don't

0:36:15.200 --> 0:36:17.799
<v Speaker 1>agree with everything that you know, the must say, but

0:36:17.920 --> 0:36:20.360
<v Speaker 1>I have to say that, you know is the is

0:36:20.360 --> 0:36:23.040
<v Speaker 1>an Internet magician, so you know, you have to respect that.

0:36:23.160 --> 0:36:26.480
<v Speaker 1>You know, this idea of security and and some of

0:36:26.520 --> 0:36:29.600
<v Speaker 1>these big names Elon Musk when it comes to potential

0:36:29.680 --> 0:36:33.279
<v Speaker 1>crypto and Twitter and Jack Dorrisey getting deeper into crypto.

0:36:33.400 --> 0:36:36.640
<v Speaker 1>At the end of the day, with crypto being down

0:36:36.840 --> 0:36:40.000
<v Speaker 1>even among one of the biggest conferences that surround bitcoin,

0:36:40.600 --> 0:36:43.200
<v Speaker 1>what are you seeing in terms of institutional interests and

0:36:43.239 --> 0:36:45.600
<v Speaker 1>what's stopping people at the end of the day really

0:36:45.640 --> 0:36:50.839
<v Speaker 1>from getting in. Nothing is stopping people to get in now.

0:36:50.920 --> 0:36:52.960
<v Speaker 1>I think I think people need to understand that with crypto,

0:36:53.080 --> 0:36:56.040
<v Speaker 1>we sort of we just got into like a thirty

0:36:56.080 --> 0:36:59.759
<v Speaker 1>years uh you know, uh circle of like going up.

0:37:00.040 --> 0:37:04.680
<v Speaker 1>You know, like there is massive adoption anywhere anywhere you

0:37:04.719 --> 0:37:07.160
<v Speaker 1>look at, you know, whether it's cryptocurrencies, n f T s.

0:37:07.239 --> 0:37:09.640
<v Speaker 1>I think that the next big thing will be played

0:37:09.680 --> 0:37:13.719
<v Speaker 1>to earn um and so you know, everyone is coming

0:37:13.760 --> 0:37:19.080
<v Speaker 1>in from from retail perspective, but also from an institutional perspective.

0:37:19.080 --> 0:37:20.560
<v Speaker 1>You know, I've been in these games. It's two does

0:37:20.600 --> 0:37:22.920
<v Speaker 1>and fourteen. And I can tell you that now no

0:37:22.960 --> 0:37:26.759
<v Speaker 1>one is doubting the you know crypto or bitcoin or

0:37:27.000 --> 0:37:29.920
<v Speaker 1>you know bloog chain technologies. Like everyone wants in and

0:37:29.960 --> 0:37:33.799
<v Speaker 1>so you have an amazing phenomenon because it's worldwide two

0:37:33.840 --> 0:37:36.240
<v Speaker 1>Like everyone is getting in from everywhere in the world.

0:37:36.480 --> 0:37:38.520
<v Speaker 1>And this is actually very unique. This is the first

0:37:38.520 --> 0:37:41.279
<v Speaker 1>time that everyone everywhere in the world is getting in

0:37:41.280 --> 0:37:43.879
<v Speaker 1>into the same technology rail. And so this is why

0:37:43.920 --> 0:37:48.520
<v Speaker 1>you see so much momentum going happening right now. Pascal

0:37:48.800 --> 0:37:51.480
<v Speaker 1>Gaultier Ledger CEO and Share will let you get back

0:37:51.520 --> 0:37:54.200
<v Speaker 1>to Bitcoin Miami. Thank you for taking the time along

0:37:54.200 --> 0:38:06.719
<v Speaker 1>with Bloomberg. Apple is back online the iphonemaker, announcing it

0:38:06.719 --> 0:38:10.000
<v Speaker 1>will hold its annual Worldwide Developers Conference virtually for the

0:38:10.080 --> 0:38:12.839
<v Speaker 1>third year in a row, a sign that major tech

0:38:12.880 --> 0:38:15.839
<v Speaker 1>events are still a ways off from returning to pre

0:38:15.920 --> 0:38:18.600
<v Speaker 1>pandemic norms. I want to bring in our Mark German,

0:38:18.640 --> 0:38:21.440
<v Speaker 1>who of course covers Apple for us, So we mark.

0:38:21.480 --> 0:38:23.400
<v Speaker 1>Apple has been leading a push to come back to

0:38:23.600 --> 0:38:26.560
<v Speaker 1>its office for its own employees. Why hold this event

0:38:26.640 --> 0:38:30.360
<v Speaker 1>virtually again? Yeah, they really had no choice but to

0:38:30.400 --> 0:38:33.120
<v Speaker 1>do this virtually, right, We don't know what's going to

0:38:33.200 --> 0:38:35.040
<v Speaker 1>happen with COVID over the next two months or so.

0:38:35.160 --> 0:38:39.680
<v Speaker 1>It's not predictable. These shows take several months to put together, right,

0:38:39.920 --> 0:38:41.880
<v Speaker 1>They either have to put three months of time and

0:38:42.000 --> 0:38:45.200
<v Speaker 1>developing an in person version or three months time developing

0:38:45.200 --> 0:38:47.920
<v Speaker 1>an online version. And it's really hard to put you

0:38:48.120 --> 0:38:50.960
<v Speaker 1>all your effort and if you're splitting it across both,

0:38:51.160 --> 0:38:53.120
<v Speaker 1>so they have to pick one direction, and the in

0:38:53.200 --> 0:38:55.879
<v Speaker 1>person direction is just not safe at this point. Who

0:38:55.920 --> 0:38:57.880
<v Speaker 1>knows what could happen with COVID one week or the

0:38:57.960 --> 0:38:59.640
<v Speaker 1>day of the event where they have to cancel the

0:38:59.640 --> 0:39:02.040
<v Speaker 1>whole thing. Apple was in a position where it really

0:39:02.080 --> 0:39:04.600
<v Speaker 1>couldn't afford to become stuck, so we'd have to go

0:39:04.680 --> 0:39:07.239
<v Speaker 1>online only. And the compromises they're going to allow a

0:39:07.239 --> 0:39:09.440
<v Speaker 1>small number of people in the Steve Jobs Theater at

0:39:09.480 --> 0:39:12.879
<v Speaker 1>the Apple Park headquarters to watch the prerecorded video live.

0:39:13.760 --> 0:39:17.520
<v Speaker 1>So what are we expecting the substance of this developers

0:39:17.560 --> 0:39:21.480
<v Speaker 1>conference will be? What will be the big announcements? I

0:39:21.520 --> 0:39:25.240
<v Speaker 1>think this is gonna be a fairly strong Apple Developer conference.

0:39:25.360 --> 0:39:28.400
<v Speaker 1>Right They are scheduled to release new Max, including a

0:39:28.400 --> 0:39:30.160
<v Speaker 1>new version of the MacBook Air, around the middle of

0:39:30.239 --> 0:39:33.480
<v Speaker 1>the year, so perhaps they use ABDWDC to introduce that laptop.

0:39:33.800 --> 0:39:35.799
<v Speaker 1>That's going to be a very big deal. Obviously there's

0:39:35.800 --> 0:39:37.640
<v Speaker 1>lots of fans of the MacBook Air and this will

0:39:37.640 --> 0:39:40.160
<v Speaker 1>be the biggest redesign and the product's history, and we'll

0:39:40.200 --> 0:39:42.680
<v Speaker 1>have a new version of the Apple in house. Chips

0:39:43.239 --> 0:39:46.280
<v Speaker 1>were also looking for major fitness tracking and health upgrades

0:39:46.320 --> 0:39:48.200
<v Speaker 1>on the Apple Watch, as well as a pretty big

0:39:48.280 --> 0:39:51.560
<v Speaker 1>update to iOS Dios sixteen, though I'm not expecting a

0:39:51.600 --> 0:39:55.400
<v Speaker 1>full blown redesign. And additionally, there should be some conversation

0:39:55.440 --> 0:39:58.440
<v Speaker 1>about a R and VR applications ahead of a larger

0:39:58.480 --> 0:40:02.239
<v Speaker 1>reveal of its mixed reality hardware for its headset later

0:40:02.320 --> 0:40:06.040
<v Speaker 1>this year or next year. You've been reporting on Apple's

0:40:06.280 --> 0:40:09.520
<v Speaker 1>return to the office and push back from some employees.

0:40:09.840 --> 0:40:12.440
<v Speaker 1>How is this evolving? I mean, and could you see

0:40:12.800 --> 0:40:15.359
<v Speaker 1>Apple losing talent as a result when you know other

0:40:15.360 --> 0:40:19.319
<v Speaker 1>companies are also pushing for people to come back. Yes,

0:40:19.400 --> 0:40:21.759
<v Speaker 1>So next week that's the deadline to start returning to

0:40:21.760 --> 0:40:24.000
<v Speaker 1>the office if you're an Apple corporate employee. Right, So

0:40:24.000 --> 0:40:25.880
<v Speaker 1>they'll start one day a week in the office on

0:40:25.920 --> 0:40:28.520
<v Speaker 1>April eleven, right next Monday, and then a few weeks

0:40:28.520 --> 0:40:30.279
<v Speaker 1>after that, it will be two days a week, and

0:40:30.320 --> 0:40:32.040
<v Speaker 1>by the end of May, or a week before the

0:40:32.160 --> 0:40:34.080
<v Speaker 1>end of May, they're going to expect employees in the

0:40:34.080 --> 0:40:37.520
<v Speaker 1>office Monday's, Tuesdays, and Thursdays. Now, I would say there's

0:40:37.560 --> 0:40:39.880
<v Speaker 1>probably at least a few hundred employees who are leaving

0:40:39.920 --> 0:40:43.680
<v Speaker 1>Apple over that policy. But you know, we should note

0:40:43.680 --> 0:40:46.160
<v Speaker 1>that Apple has over a hundred and sixty thousand employees.

0:40:46.520 --> 0:40:49.120
<v Speaker 1>Obviously most of that is retailed. It's still several tens

0:40:49.120 --> 0:40:51.280
<v Speaker 1>of thousands of employees, so this is a small number

0:40:51.600 --> 0:40:54.279
<v Speaker 1>of people all together. The interesting thing to me, if you,

0:40:54.320 --> 0:40:56.640
<v Speaker 1>if anyone wants to read my Business Week story on this,

0:40:56.920 --> 0:40:59.879
<v Speaker 1>is that Apple put out a nine minute advertisement how

0:41:00.200 --> 0:41:02.840
<v Speaker 1>how great its own products, software and services are for

0:41:02.880 --> 0:41:06.120
<v Speaker 1>remote work. Yeah, it's recording those very people who developed

0:41:06.120 --> 0:41:08.279
<v Speaker 1>those products to work from the office. So a little

0:41:08.280 --> 0:41:11.759
<v Speaker 1>bit of irony right there. Irony. Indeed, Mark German as

0:41:11.800 --> 0:41:14.600
<v Speaker 1>always great to have you. Thanks, and that does it

0:41:14.719 --> 0:41:17.400
<v Speaker 1>for this edition of Bloomberg Technology. We are back tomorrow.

0:41:17.440 --> 0:41:20.120
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna be joined by J. B. Unknown, President and

0:41:20.360 --> 0:41:24.400
<v Speaker 1>CEO of eBay. And don't forget to check out our podcasts.

0:41:24.600 --> 0:41:27.680
<v Speaker 1>Find it anywhere you get your podcast. I'm Emily Chang

0:41:27.680 --> 0:41:29.680
<v Speaker 1>in San Francisco. This is Bloomberg