WEBVTT - How Economic Complexity Explains Which Countries Become Rich

0:00:10.240 --> 0:00:13.920
<v Speaker 1>Hello, and welcome to another episode of the Odd Lots Podcast.

0:00:14.000 --> 0:00:16.360
<v Speaker 2>I'm Joe Wisenthal and I'm Tracy Alloway.

0:00:16.680 --> 0:00:19.440
<v Speaker 1>Tracy, I'm super late to everything. First of all, did

0:00:19.480 --> 0:00:20.120
<v Speaker 1>you play Wordle?

0:00:21.600 --> 0:00:24.120
<v Speaker 2>I did. I didn't get obsessed with it like some

0:00:24.200 --> 0:00:27.040
<v Speaker 2>people did, but I think we were all fairly bored

0:00:27.280 --> 0:00:30.000
<v Speaker 2>during that time period and on the lookout for any

0:00:30.040 --> 0:00:31.480
<v Speaker 2>sort of entertainment.

0:00:31.080 --> 0:00:34.919
<v Speaker 1>And it never clicked. But I'm always late to everything.

0:00:35.400 --> 0:00:37.320
<v Speaker 1>Like a year ago, people were telling me it's like, oh,

0:00:37.320 --> 0:00:40.360
<v Speaker 1>you gotta play this game trade all, and I did end,

0:00:40.600 --> 0:00:42.440
<v Speaker 1>but like three or four months ago, I started really

0:00:42.440 --> 0:00:44.160
<v Speaker 1>getting into it, and I think you're into it now too.

0:00:44.360 --> 0:00:44.600
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:00:44.680 --> 0:00:48.320
<v Speaker 2>I think we both started playing around the same time,

0:00:48.600 --> 0:00:50.920
<v Speaker 2>probably because we heard about it from the same person.

0:00:51.560 --> 0:00:53.880
<v Speaker 2>It is a fun game, so for those who don't

0:00:53.960 --> 0:00:58.400
<v Speaker 2>know it is like Wordle. It basically presents a sort

0:00:58.440 --> 0:01:03.840
<v Speaker 2>of graphic schematic of an unnamed country's exports, and you

0:01:03.880 --> 0:01:05.920
<v Speaker 2>have to try to guess what country it is.

0:01:06.520 --> 0:01:09.360
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, exactly, And I'm not very good at geography, so

0:01:09.600 --> 0:01:12.720
<v Speaker 1>often it'll say like, Okay, you're close, but it's like

0:01:12.720 --> 0:01:15.080
<v Speaker 1>you have to go fifteen hundred kilometers to the northwest.

0:01:15.160 --> 0:01:17.399
<v Speaker 1>I'm pretty bad at geography, so I'm not good. But

0:01:18.680 --> 0:01:22.440
<v Speaker 1>as playing this game and watching the way the different

0:01:22.520 --> 0:01:26.000
<v Speaker 1>shapes of different countries export mix, I feel like I've

0:01:26.080 --> 0:01:29.080
<v Speaker 1>really started to learn things about the world.

0:01:29.480 --> 0:01:32.640
<v Speaker 2>I have learned so much about the economy of Angola.

0:01:32.720 --> 0:01:33.000
<v Speaker 3>Right.

0:01:33.080 --> 0:01:36.240
<v Speaker 1>So you see a country and it's like eighty percent

0:01:36.319 --> 0:01:40.039
<v Speaker 1>of their exports are like coffee in gold, right or

0:01:40.040 --> 0:01:42.160
<v Speaker 1>something like that, and you're like, Okay, this is a

0:01:42.200 --> 0:01:45.680
<v Speaker 1>relatively poor country. It has a lot of growth left

0:01:45.680 --> 0:01:49.200
<v Speaker 1>to do. And then you see another country and it's

0:01:49.240 --> 0:01:56.120
<v Speaker 1>like advanced circuits and medicine and hangars and bananas and

0:01:56.120 --> 0:01:57.520
<v Speaker 1>all this stuff, and like, oh, and you start to

0:01:57.520 --> 0:01:59.960
<v Speaker 1>see these shapes and these distributions. That's sort of like

0:02:00.280 --> 0:02:02.240
<v Speaker 1>tell you things. It's like, Okay, I can guess maybe

0:02:02.240 --> 0:02:04.120
<v Speaker 1>this is in Europe, or maybe they have a lot

0:02:04.120 --> 0:02:06.240
<v Speaker 1>of things, maybe it's in Eastern Europe. You suddenly sort

0:02:06.280 --> 0:02:09.480
<v Speaker 1>of learn like how rich countries goods exports really differ

0:02:10.040 --> 0:02:12.079
<v Speaker 1>from poorer countries goods exports.

0:02:12.160 --> 0:02:15.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, totally. There are three clues that it gives you.

0:02:15.200 --> 0:02:18.440
<v Speaker 2>One is distance, as you just mentioned, and the other

0:02:18.600 --> 0:02:21.160
<v Speaker 2>is total size of exports. So that gives you an

0:02:21.160 --> 0:02:24.680
<v Speaker 2>indication of how big or small that economy is. And

0:02:24.720 --> 0:02:28.400
<v Speaker 2>then that third thing is the nature of the exports,

0:02:28.400 --> 0:02:31.600
<v Speaker 2>and it sort of divides them up into different categories,

0:02:31.840 --> 0:02:34.880
<v Speaker 2>but it gives you a really good snapshot of a

0:02:34.919 --> 0:02:38.720
<v Speaker 2>country's economy. And as you play the game, you start

0:02:38.720 --> 0:02:44.240
<v Speaker 2>to recognize I guess certain economic export attributes. Yeah, go

0:02:44.560 --> 0:02:47.440
<v Speaker 2>with certain types of countries or economies.

0:02:47.560 --> 0:02:51.760
<v Speaker 1>Right, so integrated circuits and palm oil, probably Southeast Asia, right,

0:02:51.919 --> 0:02:55.080
<v Speaker 1>something like that. Anyway, this game that you and I

0:02:55.080 --> 0:02:58.080
<v Speaker 1>have become obsessed with, it's sort of based on this

0:02:58.200 --> 0:03:02.760
<v Speaker 1>work related to economic complexity, the Atlas of Economic Complexity,

0:03:03.080 --> 0:03:05.520
<v Speaker 1>this sort of idea, and this is something that's come up.

0:03:05.520 --> 0:03:07.520
<v Speaker 1>It came up in an episode we did with Henry

0:03:07.520 --> 0:03:10.720
<v Speaker 1>Williams and David Os. It came up with the episode

0:03:10.720 --> 0:03:13.400
<v Speaker 1>we did with Dan Wong and why some countries can

0:03:13.440 --> 0:03:17.040
<v Speaker 1>develop airline industries and other countries can't. This idea that

0:03:17.560 --> 0:03:22.760
<v Speaker 1>complexity of goods exports complexity is in itself a sort

0:03:22.800 --> 0:03:24.000
<v Speaker 1>of predictor of wealth.

0:03:24.320 --> 0:03:28.720
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and maybe it's also a desirable model for countries

0:03:28.760 --> 0:03:31.320
<v Speaker 2>to sort of aspire to, this idea that maybe they

0:03:31.320 --> 0:03:34.800
<v Speaker 2>want to get away from simply producing a bunch of

0:03:34.840 --> 0:03:37.480
<v Speaker 2>t shirts, So like fifty percent of their economy is

0:03:37.560 --> 0:03:40.160
<v Speaker 2>T shirt exports or something like that. They want to

0:03:40.200 --> 0:03:43.680
<v Speaker 2>get to a place where they have expertise across a

0:03:43.840 --> 0:03:47.880
<v Speaker 2>broad and value added sort of realm of exports.

0:03:48.160 --> 0:03:50.440
<v Speaker 1>Or maybe they export a lot of nickel and they

0:03:50.480 --> 0:03:53.000
<v Speaker 1>want to be in like refined nickel, right, some nickel

0:03:53.040 --> 0:03:56.600
<v Speaker 1>relatais the commodity just pure Anyway, this has sort of

0:03:56.640 --> 0:03:59.040
<v Speaker 1>like really opened up a lot of these conversations playing

0:03:59.040 --> 0:04:01.880
<v Speaker 1>like thinking about the world. So I'm really excited about

0:04:01.920 --> 0:04:04.640
<v Speaker 1>our guest because our guest has done more work on

0:04:04.680 --> 0:04:08.160
<v Speaker 1>this idea of economic complexity and why nations are able

0:04:08.200 --> 0:04:12.640
<v Speaker 1>to develop complex, rich economies. He's also the creator of

0:04:12.720 --> 0:04:15.800
<v Speaker 1>that at list of economic complexity. We're going to be

0:04:15.800 --> 0:04:18.560
<v Speaker 1>speaking with Ricardo Housman. He's a professor at the Harvard

0:04:18.640 --> 0:04:22.640
<v Speaker 1>Kennedy School and the founding director of the Harvard Growth Lab.

0:04:23.200 --> 0:04:26.240
<v Speaker 1>All of my trade off friends are super excited about

0:04:26.279 --> 0:04:29.360
<v Speaker 1>listening to this conversation. Doctor Husman. Thank you so much

0:04:29.400 --> 0:04:30.560
<v Speaker 1>for coming on odd Lats.

0:04:31.640 --> 0:04:33.760
<v Speaker 3>Oh, it's a pleasure to be with you. Thank you

0:04:33.800 --> 0:04:34.440
<v Speaker 3>for inviting me.

0:04:34.640 --> 0:04:38.000
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely. What is economic complexity?

0:04:38.720 --> 0:04:43.000
<v Speaker 3>Economic complexity is an attempt to measure how much countries

0:04:43.480 --> 0:04:46.520
<v Speaker 3>or places know what to do, so like I try

0:04:46.920 --> 0:04:51.280
<v Speaker 3>to measure no. How Now, if you want to think

0:04:51.839 --> 0:04:54.640
<v Speaker 3>about knowledge and say, well, and I know people who

0:04:54.760 --> 0:04:58.400
<v Speaker 3>have a bachelor's degree, people who will hire high school dropouts,

0:04:58.480 --> 0:05:01.599
<v Speaker 3>people who have a PhD. That sort of tells you

0:05:01.680 --> 0:05:05.760
<v Speaker 3>how much a person knows. But if you ask yourself,

0:05:06.040 --> 0:05:09.760
<v Speaker 3>how much does a society know, well, that would be different.

0:05:09.800 --> 0:05:12.520
<v Speaker 3>That would not be characterized by the average, say the

0:05:12.640 --> 0:05:16.680
<v Speaker 3>average number of years of schooling that the society has.

0:05:17.240 --> 0:05:21.200
<v Speaker 3>Not A society that is full of just dentists will

0:05:21.279 --> 0:05:24.560
<v Speaker 3>know less than a society that is half dentists and

0:05:24.640 --> 0:05:28.799
<v Speaker 3>half lawyers, or a society that is a third dentist,

0:05:28.920 --> 0:05:32.760
<v Speaker 3>a third lawyer, or third engineers. So in some sense

0:05:32.800 --> 0:05:36.760
<v Speaker 3>you want to know how much the whole of society knows.

0:05:36.920 --> 0:05:40.680
<v Speaker 3>And one of the important things about knowledge is that

0:05:40.880 --> 0:05:45.880
<v Speaker 3>knowledge at the societal level has been exploding exponentially, but

0:05:46.040 --> 0:05:50.640
<v Speaker 3>our mental capacity to know has not. So the way

0:05:50.720 --> 0:05:56.800
<v Speaker 3>the economy has been adapting and adopting growing amounts of

0:05:56.920 --> 0:06:02.080
<v Speaker 3>knowledge is by putting different bits of knowledge in different heads,

0:06:02.120 --> 0:06:04.880
<v Speaker 3>sort of like parallel processing. You know, if you want

0:06:04.880 --> 0:06:07.200
<v Speaker 3>to run a company, you will need somebody who knows

0:06:07.240 --> 0:06:11.799
<v Speaker 3>about accounting, about finance, about marketing, about human resource management,

0:06:11.880 --> 0:06:17.160
<v Speaker 3>about contracts, about taxes, about procurement, about engineering. So you

0:06:17.279 --> 0:06:20.760
<v Speaker 3>want to have a lot of knowledge to run these things,

0:06:21.040 --> 0:06:23.800
<v Speaker 3>but you cannot stuff that knowledge into a single head.

0:06:23.839 --> 0:06:26.799
<v Speaker 3>You have to spread it into a bunch of heads,

0:06:27.680 --> 0:06:31.359
<v Speaker 3>and then you have to bring those heads together back again.

0:06:31.480 --> 0:06:34.440
<v Speaker 3>You have to kind of put humpty dumpty back together again.

0:06:35.480 --> 0:06:39.000
<v Speaker 3>So the way in which a society grows is it

0:06:39.040 --> 0:06:42.040
<v Speaker 3>grows its knowledge by putting different bits of knowledge in

0:06:42.080 --> 0:06:46.000
<v Speaker 3>different heads and then by bringing those heads together. Now,

0:06:46.040 --> 0:06:50.320
<v Speaker 3>if a society makes very simple things, it makes things

0:06:50.320 --> 0:06:53.040
<v Speaker 3>that can be done by few people, because the knowledge

0:06:53.080 --> 0:06:55.760
<v Speaker 3>that is needed to make one of those things, you know,

0:06:55.839 --> 0:06:58.640
<v Speaker 3>fits in just a few heads. But if you're going

0:06:58.680 --> 0:07:02.080
<v Speaker 3>to do stuff that requires not a lot of knowledge,

0:07:02.120 --> 0:07:05.080
<v Speaker 3>you'll have to bring many, many more of these heads together.

0:07:05.400 --> 0:07:08.320
<v Speaker 3>You'll have to network these brains together to make that thing.

0:07:08.880 --> 0:07:14.160
<v Speaker 3>So complexity emerges as the consequence of distributed knowledge in society.

0:07:14.760 --> 0:07:17.760
<v Speaker 3>You have different bits of people knowing different things, and

0:07:17.800 --> 0:07:20.680
<v Speaker 3>then you have to bring those things together, and then

0:07:20.760 --> 0:07:25.760
<v Speaker 3>these complex networks emerge from that process. So, in some sense,

0:07:25.800 --> 0:07:30.160
<v Speaker 3>what is really driving growth is this growth of knowledge

0:07:30.200 --> 0:07:33.480
<v Speaker 3>and the growth of using that knowledge, and consequently it's

0:07:33.520 --> 0:07:36.239
<v Speaker 3>in this spread of different bits of knowledge in different

0:07:36.280 --> 0:07:39.920
<v Speaker 3>heads and the ability to bring those heads together to

0:07:40.000 --> 0:07:42.840
<v Speaker 3>make relatively long chains of brains.

0:07:43.360 --> 0:07:46.240
<v Speaker 2>I have a bunch of questions already about comparing and

0:07:46.280 --> 0:07:51.880
<v Speaker 2>contrasting measuring complexity versus the way economics has traditionally handled

0:07:51.880 --> 0:07:55.400
<v Speaker 2>some of this. But maybe a step back question why

0:07:55.400 --> 0:07:58.640
<v Speaker 2>did you decide to start looking into this? What is

0:07:58.680 --> 0:08:03.160
<v Speaker 2>the benefit of looking at complexity within a particular society

0:08:03.280 --> 0:08:03.880
<v Speaker 2>or economy.

0:08:04.800 --> 0:08:08.480
<v Speaker 3>It goes back to the question and when Adam Smith

0:08:09.000 --> 0:08:11.440
<v Speaker 3>asked himself what's the source of the wealth of nations?

0:08:11.680 --> 0:08:14.240
<v Speaker 3>He said it was the division of labor? But why

0:08:14.280 --> 0:08:16.240
<v Speaker 3>the hell would the division of labor matter? And he

0:08:16.360 --> 0:08:19.440
<v Speaker 3>gives a thin factory example that if you split the

0:08:19.480 --> 0:08:21.520
<v Speaker 3>work and this guy does the head and this guy

0:08:21.560 --> 0:08:25.440
<v Speaker 3>does the body, et cetera, that increased productivity. That idea,

0:08:26.480 --> 0:08:29.200
<v Speaker 3>I think has a kernel of what the story is.

0:08:29.800 --> 0:08:34.160
<v Speaker 3>But this stuff becomes incredibly powerful when you're talking about

0:08:34.440 --> 0:08:38.280
<v Speaker 3>knowledge driving the economy and driving society. So it's really

0:08:38.320 --> 0:08:43.079
<v Speaker 3>about the division of knowledge that's what drives growth. It's

0:08:43.120 --> 0:08:46.640
<v Speaker 3>the division of knowledge that allows the whole to know

0:08:46.840 --> 0:08:50.480
<v Speaker 3>more than its parts. And so how would you go

0:08:50.600 --> 0:08:54.800
<v Speaker 3>about measuring what a society knows how to do. Well,

0:08:54.880 --> 0:08:57.360
<v Speaker 3>let's look at what they do, because if they do something,

0:08:57.360 --> 0:09:00.000
<v Speaker 3>it means that they know how to do it right,

0:09:00.400 --> 0:09:02.440
<v Speaker 3>So it's proof that they know how to do it.

0:09:02.480 --> 0:09:05.760
<v Speaker 3>So we can look at what a society does to

0:09:05.840 --> 0:09:08.400
<v Speaker 3>figure out what is it that they know how to do.

0:09:09.040 --> 0:09:11.079
<v Speaker 3>So when you look at a country and say, okay,

0:09:11.120 --> 0:09:13.400
<v Speaker 3>this country is only good at doing a few things,

0:09:13.400 --> 0:09:16.400
<v Speaker 3>and this other country is good at doing many more things.

0:09:16.800 --> 0:09:19.280
<v Speaker 3>And this country here is making things that seem to

0:09:19.320 --> 0:09:21.920
<v Speaker 3>be simple things that can be done in small groups.

0:09:23.040 --> 0:09:25.840
<v Speaker 3>This other country that has to do things that require

0:09:25.920 --> 0:09:29.640
<v Speaker 3>this very broad network of brains coming together to make something.

0:09:30.160 --> 0:09:34.400
<v Speaker 3>It tells you something about how those economies are managing knowledge.

0:09:35.080 --> 0:09:37.040
<v Speaker 1>Tracy is sort of hinting at this, and I want

0:09:37.040 --> 0:09:38.840
<v Speaker 1>to sort of drill down on this before moving on.

0:09:39.080 --> 0:09:41.320
<v Speaker 1>You know, there are various traditional ways in which we

0:09:41.440 --> 0:09:45.320
<v Speaker 1>measure economies. GDP is more or less a different way

0:09:45.360 --> 0:09:48.040
<v Speaker 1>of like you just add up everyone's income and you say, okay,

0:09:48.040 --> 0:09:50.520
<v Speaker 1>this country is richer than this country, and this country

0:09:50.600 --> 0:09:53.600
<v Speaker 1>is richer than the next. Give us the basics. You

0:09:53.640 --> 0:09:56.680
<v Speaker 1>know you have country A and country B. How do

0:09:56.720 --> 0:09:59.959
<v Speaker 1>you like measure? Okay, this country is more comp more

0:10:00.120 --> 0:10:04.280
<v Speaker 1>complex economy capable of more complexity than country be.

0:10:04.960 --> 0:10:08.320
<v Speaker 3>So let me first say you can measure GDP and

0:10:08.440 --> 0:10:12.000
<v Speaker 3>so GPS how much countries are able to make in

0:10:12.080 --> 0:10:14.560
<v Speaker 3>terms of income. That doesn't tell you why they are

0:10:14.600 --> 0:10:17.840
<v Speaker 3>able to make it. Economic complexity is trying to get

0:10:17.880 --> 0:10:20.600
<v Speaker 3>at why is it that you are able to generate

0:10:20.640 --> 0:10:24.280
<v Speaker 3>more income? What's underpinning that? And for that, we like

0:10:24.360 --> 0:10:27.920
<v Speaker 3>to measure how much a society knows in our standard measure.

0:10:28.000 --> 0:10:30.960
<v Speaker 3>We've now applied it to a whole different bunch of fields,

0:10:31.320 --> 0:10:34.880
<v Speaker 3>not just in exports but other things. But we started

0:10:34.880 --> 0:10:37.480
<v Speaker 3>with exports, and the reason why we started with exports

0:10:37.640 --> 0:10:40.160
<v Speaker 3>is because we needed a data set that included all

0:10:40.160 --> 0:10:42.280
<v Speaker 3>the countries in the world, so we could benchmark all

0:10:42.280 --> 0:10:45.800
<v Speaker 3>the countries in the world with a standardized classification. And

0:10:45.920 --> 0:10:49.880
<v Speaker 3>since international trade it involves different countries, they've all agreed

0:10:49.960 --> 0:10:54.640
<v Speaker 3>on some common classification scheme, so it was expedient for us.

0:10:54.920 --> 0:10:58.600
<v Speaker 3>But experts are also something that tells you whether a

0:10:58.600 --> 0:11:02.520
<v Speaker 3>society is good enough at making something that it is

0:11:02.600 --> 0:11:04.880
<v Speaker 3>able to sell abroad, So it's kind of like a

0:11:04.920 --> 0:11:08.520
<v Speaker 3>litmus test that you're pretty good at making something. So

0:11:08.559 --> 0:11:11.920
<v Speaker 3>I don't really care how much they make. I just

0:11:12.000 --> 0:11:14.160
<v Speaker 3>care that they are able to make it, so that

0:11:14.160 --> 0:11:17.640
<v Speaker 3>that knowledge is somewhere in that society. So the way

0:11:18.120 --> 0:11:21.319
<v Speaker 3>you would think about calculating how much knowledge of society

0:11:21.360 --> 0:11:23.400
<v Speaker 3>has would say, tell me how many different things that

0:11:23.440 --> 0:11:26.160
<v Speaker 3>are they able to make? You're mentioning angola, or they

0:11:26.200 --> 0:11:30.000
<v Speaker 3>make mostly oils essentially that's their thing, or do they

0:11:30.000 --> 0:11:34.000
<v Speaker 3>do many things? So the diversity of their export basket

0:11:34.080 --> 0:11:36.360
<v Speaker 3>is kind of like a first cut, right, But you

0:11:36.400 --> 0:11:41.120
<v Speaker 3>would say, well, but products differ in how knowledge intensive

0:11:41.160 --> 0:11:43.720
<v Speaker 3>they are and how difficult they are to make. So

0:11:44.040 --> 0:11:46.800
<v Speaker 3>we found a trick on how to measure how difficult

0:11:46.800 --> 0:11:49.640
<v Speaker 3>it is to make a product by simply asking the

0:11:49.720 --> 0:11:52.760
<v Speaker 3>question how many countries are able to make this product.

0:11:53.200 --> 0:11:56.000
<v Speaker 3>So if you talk about raw wood, many many countries

0:11:56.040 --> 0:11:59.360
<v Speaker 3>export raw wood. If you tell me about microscopes or

0:11:59.480 --> 0:12:02.720
<v Speaker 3>X raymage, very few countries are able to export those things.

0:12:02.960 --> 0:12:06.240
<v Speaker 3>So that tells you something already about how difficult it

0:12:06.320 --> 0:12:08.960
<v Speaker 3>is to make these things, right, So we call that

0:12:09.000 --> 0:12:11.960
<v Speaker 3>the ubiquity of a product. And then you can ask

0:12:12.000 --> 0:12:17.559
<v Speaker 3>yourself the question, Okay, on average, how ubiquitous are the

0:12:17.600 --> 0:12:21.400
<v Speaker 3>products that this country makes? That is this country making

0:12:21.520 --> 0:12:24.840
<v Speaker 3>mostly things that are simple to do that everybody knows

0:12:24.880 --> 0:12:26.920
<v Speaker 3>how to do, or or they make things that are

0:12:26.960 --> 0:12:29.240
<v Speaker 3>hard to do, things that are done in few places.

0:12:29.880 --> 0:12:32.439
<v Speaker 3>So that's kind of like a different cut out of

0:12:32.440 --> 0:12:36.360
<v Speaker 3>the data. And you simply repeat this process an infinite

0:12:36.480 --> 0:12:40.160
<v Speaker 3>number of times and it generates an algorithm that ranks

0:12:40.240 --> 0:12:43.440
<v Speaker 3>both the countries in terms of how complex they are

0:12:43.880 --> 0:12:46.480
<v Speaker 3>and the products in terms of how complex they are.

0:12:46.960 --> 0:12:50.160
<v Speaker 3>So essentially, it's an operation on this matrix if you

0:12:50.200 --> 0:12:53.360
<v Speaker 3>want that relates countries to the products that they make.

0:12:53.520 --> 0:12:57.240
<v Speaker 3>It is an eigenvector of that matrix. Essentially, if you

0:12:57.240 --> 0:13:00.640
<v Speaker 3>want to get fancy at the mouth, but it captures

0:13:00.679 --> 0:13:02.760
<v Speaker 3>this idea how many things are we able to do

0:13:02.840 --> 0:13:05.360
<v Speaker 3>and how complicated it is to do those things.

0:13:21.960 --> 0:13:26.800
<v Speaker 2>So is it possible to have a good economic outcome

0:13:27.280 --> 0:13:31.040
<v Speaker 2>with low complexity? Or I guess another way of saying

0:13:31.080 --> 0:13:35.480
<v Speaker 2>this is is complexity as synonym for development or wealth here?

0:13:35.840 --> 0:13:39.000
<v Speaker 2>Or capturing something different? Could you have a country that

0:13:39.040 --> 0:13:43.679
<v Speaker 2>scores low on complexity but is still a relatively good

0:13:43.840 --> 0:13:46.400
<v Speaker 2>place to live from an economic perspective.

0:13:47.360 --> 0:13:52.560
<v Speaker 3>So one major thing that economic complexity does not capture

0:13:52.800 --> 0:13:57.680
<v Speaker 3>is natural resource wealth. Okay, so when you make a graphs, say,

0:13:57.720 --> 0:14:00.800
<v Speaker 3>of the relationship between how complex you are are and

0:14:00.880 --> 0:14:04.520
<v Speaker 3>how rich you are, the outliers tend to be countries

0:14:04.600 --> 0:14:08.880
<v Speaker 3>that are natural resource rich. So they get their income

0:14:08.960 --> 0:14:11.880
<v Speaker 3>not so much by what they know how to do,

0:14:12.080 --> 0:14:15.720
<v Speaker 3>but from the natural resource wealth that they happen to have.

0:14:16.120 --> 0:14:19.440
<v Speaker 2>So a place like the United Arab Emirates or Saudi

0:14:19.480 --> 0:14:24.320
<v Speaker 2>Arabia perhaps might score low on complexity, but they have

0:14:24.360 --> 0:14:27.480
<v Speaker 2>a ton of oil wealth and so they're still quite

0:14:27.520 --> 0:14:30.600
<v Speaker 2>prosperous on a GDP per capita basis that sort of

0:14:30.600 --> 0:14:32.520
<v Speaker 2>thing exactly.

0:14:32.600 --> 0:14:36.000
<v Speaker 3>So, or you could say, tell me, controlling for their

0:14:36.080 --> 0:14:39.360
<v Speaker 3>natural resource wealth, they have a lot of complexity or not.

0:14:40.200 --> 0:14:41.800
<v Speaker 3>And let me tell you a few of the things

0:14:41.840 --> 0:14:45.120
<v Speaker 3>we have established. The first one is that the complexity

0:14:45.240 --> 0:14:48.720
<v Speaker 3>correlates very highly with how rich you are, and if

0:14:48.720 --> 0:14:52.760
<v Speaker 3>you control for your natural resource wealth, it correlates even better.

0:14:52.840 --> 0:14:56.560
<v Speaker 3>So there's a very strong relationship between economic complexity and

0:14:56.640 --> 0:15:01.120
<v Speaker 3>natural resource and your GDP per capita in level. So

0:15:01.160 --> 0:15:04.280
<v Speaker 3>that's a very strong relationship. But more importantly than that,

0:15:05.560 --> 0:15:10.239
<v Speaker 3>countries that are more complex than you would have expected

0:15:10.280 --> 0:15:13.800
<v Speaker 3>them to be given their income level tend to grow

0:15:13.840 --> 0:15:17.360
<v Speaker 3>faster in the future, and countries that have relatively low

0:15:17.400 --> 0:15:21.720
<v Speaker 3>complexity relatives to their income level tend to grow less

0:15:21.800 --> 0:15:26.040
<v Speaker 3>in the future. So your economic complexity relative to your

0:15:26.040 --> 0:15:28.880
<v Speaker 3>income level is a predictor of how fast you will

0:15:28.920 --> 0:15:31.680
<v Speaker 3>be able to grow. And typically when we look at

0:15:31.720 --> 0:15:34.360
<v Speaker 3>how good these predictions are, they tend to be best

0:15:34.680 --> 0:15:37.640
<v Speaker 3>at a horizon of about ten years, So it tells

0:15:37.680 --> 0:15:40.760
<v Speaker 3>you something about what your next decade is likely to

0:15:40.880 --> 0:15:41.280
<v Speaker 3>look like.

0:15:41.920 --> 0:15:45.680
<v Speaker 1>What's an example of maybe something in history in which

0:15:45.720 --> 0:15:50.560
<v Speaker 1>at some point a country scored significantly high complexity and

0:15:50.960 --> 0:15:53.480
<v Speaker 1>then did it over the next several years. It's like, yeah,

0:15:53.480 --> 0:15:56.000
<v Speaker 1>this country really boomed. What's an example that stands.

0:15:55.680 --> 0:15:59.360
<v Speaker 3>Out of this, Well, there are many examples, but suppose

0:15:59.440 --> 0:16:02.160
<v Speaker 3>if you have take the picture in two thousand and eight,

0:16:02.440 --> 0:16:07.400
<v Speaker 3>two outliers were India and Greece. India had extremely low

0:16:07.440 --> 0:16:11.200
<v Speaker 3>income levels for its level of complexity, and Greece had

0:16:11.240 --> 0:16:14.880
<v Speaker 3>extremely high income levels for their level of complexity. And

0:16:14.960 --> 0:16:18.400
<v Speaker 3>what happened is that India has been the fastest growing

0:16:18.480 --> 0:16:22.080
<v Speaker 3>large country in the world since then, and Greece collapsed.

0:16:22.680 --> 0:16:28.040
<v Speaker 3>So we also see countries that increase their complexity initially

0:16:28.080 --> 0:16:31.200
<v Speaker 3>by moving into a new set of products. In the

0:16:31.240 --> 0:16:34.640
<v Speaker 3>case of Thailand, they first moved into garments and spent

0:16:34.800 --> 0:16:37.680
<v Speaker 3>a whole decade adding a bunch of different garments to

0:16:37.720 --> 0:16:41.040
<v Speaker 3>their export baskets. Suddenly they got into electronics and then

0:16:41.080 --> 0:16:43.760
<v Speaker 3>started to add a bunch of electronics to their export basket,

0:16:43.800 --> 0:16:46.720
<v Speaker 3>and then they got into cars and machines and so on.

0:16:47.120 --> 0:16:51.040
<v Speaker 3>So they have been increasing their complexity and have very

0:16:51.560 --> 0:16:54.880
<v Speaker 3>sustained high growth rates in the process. In general, what

0:16:54.960 --> 0:16:58.400
<v Speaker 3>we find is that only about a fifth of the

0:16:58.480 --> 0:17:02.280
<v Speaker 3>countries that were poorer than the US, say, in nineteen

0:17:02.360 --> 0:17:06.960
<v Speaker 3>seventy have really caught up narrowed the gap with the US. Okay,

0:17:07.280 --> 0:17:12.720
<v Speaker 3>since nineteen seventy onwards, only twenty percent of countries narrowed

0:17:12.760 --> 0:17:15.720
<v Speaker 3>their income gap with the US. Those twenty percent of

0:17:15.760 --> 0:17:19.560
<v Speaker 3>countries that narrow their income gap with the US increase

0:17:19.840 --> 0:17:24.199
<v Speaker 3>their complexity very significantly. The other eighty percent did not.

0:17:25.119 --> 0:17:29.479
<v Speaker 3>So I would tell you that sustained growth implies this

0:17:29.640 --> 0:17:35.800
<v Speaker 3>process of absorbing knowledge, distributing in a your society, mobilizing

0:17:35.840 --> 0:17:38.800
<v Speaker 3>that knowledge to make more things and more complex things.

0:17:39.080 --> 0:17:42.080
<v Speaker 3>Because you get more complex. Things are essentially things that

0:17:42.119 --> 0:17:45.920
<v Speaker 3>require more knowledge, and things that require more knowledge require

0:17:46.040 --> 0:17:49.840
<v Speaker 3>deeper networks of humans collaborating, whether it's in a single

0:17:49.920 --> 0:17:52.040
<v Speaker 3>firm or in a longer value chain.

0:17:52.359 --> 0:17:54.720
<v Speaker 2>Can you talk a little bit more about how you

0:17:54.800 --> 0:17:59.760
<v Speaker 2>build complexity and diffuse that knowledge within a society, because

0:17:59.760 --> 0:18:03.159
<v Speaker 2>I am imagine if you're a developing country, maybe you

0:18:03.280 --> 0:18:07.840
<v Speaker 2>find that you have a competitive advantage in one type

0:18:07.840 --> 0:18:09.159
<v Speaker 2>of thing. I'm going to go back to the T

0:18:09.280 --> 0:18:12.560
<v Speaker 2>shirt example. You can make T shirts cheaper than anyone

0:18:12.640 --> 0:18:15.520
<v Speaker 2>else and more efficiently, I guess, And then I would

0:18:15.520 --> 0:18:20.760
<v Speaker 2>imagine the temptation is to just stick with that specialization

0:18:21.440 --> 0:18:24.480
<v Speaker 2>and just do the thing that you are currently really

0:18:24.480 --> 0:18:27.439
<v Speaker 2>good at. So how do countries actually break out of

0:18:27.480 --> 0:18:31.560
<v Speaker 2>that dynamic and start developing expertise in other areas.

0:18:31.920 --> 0:18:35.560
<v Speaker 3>There are essentially three mechanisms that I would like to mention.

0:18:36.480 --> 0:18:40.800
<v Speaker 3>The first one is that countries tend to move from

0:18:40.840 --> 0:18:43.879
<v Speaker 3>where they're good at to what I like to call

0:18:44.280 --> 0:18:49.720
<v Speaker 3>or Stuart Kaufman coin the phrase the adjacent possible. When

0:18:49.720 --> 0:18:53.160
<v Speaker 3>we look at countries adding products to their export basket,

0:18:53.240 --> 0:18:57.440
<v Speaker 3>those products tend to be cognitively near. If you want

0:18:57.560 --> 0:19:01.280
<v Speaker 3>the products that they were making before. And one of

0:19:01.320 --> 0:19:05.600
<v Speaker 3>the contributions we've made is we've developed a technique to

0:19:05.800 --> 0:19:11.159
<v Speaker 3>measure this cognitive proximity for all the products in the world.

0:19:11.240 --> 0:19:14.280
<v Speaker 3>And you can locate every country in the world and

0:19:14.400 --> 0:19:19.400
<v Speaker 3>find out what's in their adjacent possible So countries tend

0:19:19.440 --> 0:19:22.000
<v Speaker 3>to move from the things that they are currently good

0:19:22.040 --> 0:19:24.639
<v Speaker 3>at to things that are in their adjacent possible And

0:19:24.720 --> 0:19:27.520
<v Speaker 3>we call this cognitive map of the products of the world.

0:19:27.520 --> 0:19:30.800
<v Speaker 3>We call it the product space. And this product space

0:19:30.880 --> 0:19:34.040
<v Speaker 3>is very heterogeneous. There are some parts of the product

0:19:34.040 --> 0:19:37.080
<v Speaker 3>space there where you have products that are tightly connected

0:19:37.080 --> 0:19:39.040
<v Speaker 3>to each other. So if you know how to make

0:19:39.080 --> 0:19:41.640
<v Speaker 3>one kind of product is kind of like easy to move.

0:19:41.840 --> 0:19:44.959
<v Speaker 3>You have a rich adjacent possible. You have many ways

0:19:45.000 --> 0:19:48.800
<v Speaker 3>of reorganizing that knowledge to make other things. We like

0:19:48.840 --> 0:19:52.560
<v Speaker 3>to use the metaphor that products are like trees, and

0:19:52.680 --> 0:19:55.880
<v Speaker 3>firms are like monkeys. They live on trees, they exploit

0:19:56.000 --> 0:19:59.680
<v Speaker 3>certain trees. So the product space is like the map

0:19:59.680 --> 0:20:03.160
<v Speaker 3>of the forests. And so you can, by the way,

0:20:03.160 --> 0:20:05.280
<v Speaker 3>if you go to the Atlas and Economic complexity, we

0:20:05.320 --> 0:20:08.160
<v Speaker 3>have the we choose a country, we have the product space.

0:20:08.200 --> 0:20:12.800
<v Speaker 3>We will tell you where in that forest, does this

0:20:12.960 --> 0:20:15.760
<v Speaker 3>country have its monkeys, and then it can tell you

0:20:15.800 --> 0:20:20.240
<v Speaker 3>know which trees are close to those monkeys, and it

0:20:20.280 --> 0:20:23.000
<v Speaker 3>can tell you so you know, what are other characteristics

0:20:23.040 --> 0:20:26.240
<v Speaker 3>of those trees that might make it sexier or less

0:20:26.240 --> 0:20:29.520
<v Speaker 3>sexy to move in that direction. Okay, so the first

0:20:29.520 --> 0:20:32.159
<v Speaker 3>thing I want to say is that countries tend to

0:20:32.400 --> 0:20:36.359
<v Speaker 3>diversify by moving to their adjacent possible depending on where

0:20:36.359 --> 0:20:40.000
<v Speaker 3>they started, and not every country starts with the same

0:20:40.040 --> 0:20:42.399
<v Speaker 3>deck of cards. They don't start with their monkeys in

0:20:42.440 --> 0:20:45.760
<v Speaker 3>the same place. Some countries start with their monkeys in

0:20:45.960 --> 0:20:51.399
<v Speaker 3>very very promising parts of the product space because their

0:20:51.600 --> 0:20:54.480
<v Speaker 3>trees are very closely connected to each other there, so

0:20:54.760 --> 0:20:57.760
<v Speaker 3>it's easy for the monkeys to jump from tree to tree,

0:20:58.040 --> 0:21:00.720
<v Speaker 3>and other parts of the product space are very sparse

0:21:01.080 --> 0:21:03.199
<v Speaker 3>with their trees are very far from each other, so

0:21:03.240 --> 0:21:06.080
<v Speaker 3>it's hard for those monkeys to move. Okay, So that's

0:21:06.359 --> 0:21:12.199
<v Speaker 3>mechanism one, move towards the adjacent possible. Mechanism two is

0:21:12.240 --> 0:21:15.119
<v Speaker 3>that you have to solve this chicken and neck problem.

0:21:15.760 --> 0:21:18.359
<v Speaker 3>You don't know how to do the things you don't do,

0:21:19.640 --> 0:21:21.600
<v Speaker 3>but you need to know how to do things to

0:21:21.680 --> 0:21:25.080
<v Speaker 3>start doing things you are not doing before. So you

0:21:25.240 --> 0:21:29.000
<v Speaker 3>need watchmakers to make watches. But how do you become

0:21:29.000 --> 0:21:33.360
<v Speaker 3>a watchmaker in a country that doesn't make watches. How

0:21:33.400 --> 0:21:36.880
<v Speaker 3>do you solve this chicken and egg problem. We think

0:21:36.920 --> 0:21:39.600
<v Speaker 3>that this solving the chicken and eck problem is the

0:21:39.680 --> 0:21:43.640
<v Speaker 3>thing that forces countries into moving just to the adjacent

0:21:43.680 --> 0:21:47.040
<v Speaker 3>possible because it's hard for them to solve too many

0:21:47.080 --> 0:21:49.440
<v Speaker 3>of these chicken and egg problems at the same time.

0:21:49.920 --> 0:21:53.120
<v Speaker 3>But one way to accelerate the solution of these chicken

0:21:53.160 --> 0:21:57.720
<v Speaker 3>and eck problems is to bring watchmakers from outside your country.

0:21:58.160 --> 0:22:00.960
<v Speaker 3>That is, you may not have what makers in your country,

0:22:01.000 --> 0:22:03.520
<v Speaker 3>but maybe you start with a group of Swiss watchmakers

0:22:03.640 --> 0:22:06.360
<v Speaker 3>and they'll train the next generation of watchmakers and now

0:22:06.400 --> 0:22:11.760
<v Speaker 3>suddenly you do watchmaking right. So migration plays an outsized

0:22:11.880 --> 0:22:16.280
<v Speaker 3>role in diversification because you need to add knowledge that

0:22:16.400 --> 0:22:18.959
<v Speaker 3>was not in the system before. So if you can

0:22:19.000 --> 0:22:21.399
<v Speaker 3>attract people that had knowledge that was not in the

0:22:21.440 --> 0:22:25.280
<v Speaker 3>country and you can engage them having worked there and

0:22:25.440 --> 0:22:29.000
<v Speaker 3>have that knowledge spread, that seems to be very important.

0:22:29.280 --> 0:22:33.240
<v Speaker 3>There's a very nice story about Bangladesh here where you know,

0:22:33.240 --> 0:22:36.200
<v Speaker 3>if you look at Bangladesh in the ATHLETs of economic complexity,

0:22:36.200 --> 0:22:38.679
<v Speaker 3>you'll tell you that ninety percent of their exports are

0:22:38.760 --> 0:22:42.640
<v Speaker 3>garments and that they all started in the eighties. These

0:22:42.680 --> 0:22:45.800
<v Speaker 3>exports of garments, Well, what underpinned that was a company

0:22:46.320 --> 0:22:50.200
<v Speaker 3>which was called Desh and that company sent one hundred

0:22:50.240 --> 0:22:52.840
<v Speaker 3>and twenty six of its workers for six months training

0:22:52.880 --> 0:22:56.359
<v Speaker 3>program in Korea. Because the program that company was created

0:22:56.400 --> 0:23:00.280
<v Speaker 3>by Dai Wu. So these guys went to Korea. Yeah,

0:23:00.359 --> 0:23:04.160
<v Speaker 3>trained in Korea, came back, started the company and started

0:23:04.200 --> 0:23:08.480
<v Speaker 3>to produce. Fifty six of those people left the company

0:23:08.960 --> 0:23:13.200
<v Speaker 3>to create their own startups, and those fifty six children

0:23:13.400 --> 0:23:17.480
<v Speaker 3>of this company DSH are the core of the export

0:23:17.680 --> 0:23:21.679
<v Speaker 3>industry of garments in Bangladesh. So in some sense you

0:23:21.760 --> 0:23:25.600
<v Speaker 3>have to infect the system with knowledge and assure that

0:23:25.640 --> 0:23:28.240
<v Speaker 3>the mechanisms are going to allow that knowledge to spread.

0:23:29.080 --> 0:23:32.199
<v Speaker 1>Tracy prefaced the question. She talked about a country that

0:23:32.240 --> 0:23:34.200
<v Speaker 1>exports a lot of cheap T shirts and we sort

0:23:34.200 --> 0:23:36.600
<v Speaker 1>of think of a T shirts as being low value,

0:23:36.600 --> 0:23:40.240
<v Speaker 1>and you just mentioned the beginning of Bangladesh's process to

0:23:40.280 --> 0:23:44.280
<v Speaker 1>become wealthier and had a textile export company. But even

0:23:44.280 --> 0:23:47.000
<v Speaker 1>at least a T shirt, there's going to be some machinery,

0:23:47.520 --> 0:23:50.680
<v Speaker 1>there's going to be this something of a commodity supply

0:23:50.840 --> 0:23:54.200
<v Speaker 1>chain that has to be organized. There are certain engineering

0:23:54.280 --> 0:23:59.399
<v Speaker 1>aspects of it versus say, another country that may export

0:23:59.640 --> 0:24:02.800
<v Speaker 1>cocoa and coffee, in which I imagine that maybe it's

0:24:02.880 --> 0:24:05.720
<v Speaker 1>roughly the same level in terms of income, but strikes

0:24:05.760 --> 0:24:09.880
<v Speaker 1>me as a simpler process of selling coffee, beans or cocoa.

0:24:10.040 --> 0:24:14.360
<v Speaker 1>Are there certain goods like that consistently that, even though

0:24:14.359 --> 0:24:18.320
<v Speaker 1>they may seem rudimentary our early predictors of okay, at

0:24:18.400 --> 0:24:22.160
<v Speaker 1>least this country has some capacity to have monkeys jump

0:24:22.200 --> 0:24:23.639
<v Speaker 1>from tree to tree, so to speak.

0:24:24.720 --> 0:24:29.240
<v Speaker 3>You have given a fantastic example of what makes parts

0:24:29.240 --> 0:24:31.760
<v Speaker 3>of the product space denser and what makes parts of

0:24:31.800 --> 0:24:36.760
<v Speaker 3>the product space sparser, because garments are in a dense

0:24:36.800 --> 0:24:38.800
<v Speaker 3>part of the product space. If you know how to

0:24:38.840 --> 0:24:41.200
<v Speaker 3>make one kind of garment, you can make very different

0:24:41.280 --> 0:24:44.919
<v Speaker 3>kinds of garments. But in order to make garments and

0:24:44.960 --> 0:24:48.720
<v Speaker 3>export them competitively, right, you need to have an industrial

0:24:48.840 --> 0:24:53.359
<v Speaker 3>zone where materials can go in and out, where workers

0:24:53.440 --> 0:24:57.760
<v Speaker 3>can go in and out, where there's power, where there's water,

0:24:58.560 --> 0:25:01.919
<v Speaker 3>where there's a good logistic election to a port or

0:25:01.920 --> 0:25:06.080
<v Speaker 3>to an airport, right where the custom service works more

0:25:06.160 --> 0:25:09.880
<v Speaker 3>or less well, and maybe has to do complex sophisticated

0:25:09.920 --> 0:25:13.520
<v Speaker 3>things like letting the textiles come in in bond without

0:25:13.560 --> 0:25:17.400
<v Speaker 3>paying VAT and tariffs so that if they are going

0:25:17.440 --> 0:25:21.080
<v Speaker 3>to be exported, so you save on these transaction costs.

0:25:21.359 --> 0:25:26.719
<v Speaker 3>So getting government industry going is pretty complicated, and it

0:25:26.800 --> 0:25:32.359
<v Speaker 3>has taken fifteen years for Ethiopia to get into it,

0:25:32.400 --> 0:25:35.359
<v Speaker 3>and they're ballion. They had to build these industrial zones,

0:25:35.359 --> 0:25:38.200
<v Speaker 3>they had to provide electricity to these industrial zones. They

0:25:38.200 --> 0:25:41.840
<v Speaker 3>had to build a railway to Djibouti. An incredible number

0:25:41.880 --> 0:25:44.840
<v Speaker 3>of things that were not there that were part of

0:25:44.960 --> 0:25:48.919
<v Speaker 3>so like the ecosystem that garments require. But once you

0:25:49.040 --> 0:25:52.800
<v Speaker 3>have that ecosystem, well in the same industrial zone, maybe

0:25:52.840 --> 0:25:56.359
<v Speaker 3>with the same port and the same electricity and the

0:25:56.359 --> 0:25:59.280
<v Speaker 3>same water and maybe even the same workers, you could

0:25:59.720 --> 0:26:03.600
<v Speaker 3>s electronics. Maybe you can do some auto parts. In

0:26:03.640 --> 0:26:07.280
<v Speaker 3>the end. What's the difference between a car seat and

0:26:07.480 --> 0:26:11.199
<v Speaker 3>another leather product, So you may start producing things for

0:26:11.280 --> 0:26:14.840
<v Speaker 3>the auto industry and so on. So these things, so

0:26:15.119 --> 0:26:19.200
<v Speaker 3>garments would have many neighbors. It's easier to move from

0:26:19.280 --> 0:26:22.359
<v Speaker 3>garments to other things then to move from co co

0:26:22.600 --> 0:26:25.880
<v Speaker 3>to other things. Because you know, if you make coffee, well,

0:26:25.920 --> 0:26:29.560
<v Speaker 3>coffee grows in the tropics between nine hundred meters above

0:26:29.560 --> 0:26:32.920
<v Speaker 3>sea level and thirteen hundred meters above sea level let's say,

0:26:32.960 --> 0:26:37.280
<v Speaker 3>between three thousand and four thousand feet, And it requires

0:26:37.280 --> 0:26:40.040
<v Speaker 3>a tree to provide shadow. And so if you suddenly say,

0:26:40.160 --> 0:26:42.639
<v Speaker 3>you know what, I'm not going to grow coffee anymore,

0:26:42.680 --> 0:26:45.439
<v Speaker 3>I'm going to do something else, well, what else are

0:26:45.480 --> 0:26:47.960
<v Speaker 3>you going to do between three thousand and four thousand

0:26:48.000 --> 0:26:52.960
<v Speaker 3>feet altitude? It's in a mountainous region. So it does

0:26:53.040 --> 0:26:58.400
<v Speaker 3>not make diversification from coffee into other things very easy.

0:26:58.680 --> 0:27:01.680
<v Speaker 3>But diversifying in an an industrial song from one kind

0:27:01.720 --> 0:27:05.520
<v Speaker 3>of manufacturer to another kind of manufacturer is much easier.

0:27:05.680 --> 0:27:07.480
<v Speaker 2>You know, I kind of enjoy it just hearing the

0:27:07.520 --> 0:27:10.800
<v Speaker 2>specific examples of how this works. Do you have a

0:27:10.960 --> 0:27:14.879
<v Speaker 2>favorite example of this sort of monkey's jumping from trees

0:27:15.160 --> 0:27:18.760
<v Speaker 2>dynamic or maybe even one going in reverse? Like, I'm

0:27:18.760 --> 0:27:21.640
<v Speaker 2>curious how that happens as well, how an economy would

0:27:21.680 --> 0:27:23.720
<v Speaker 2>maybe lose complexity over time.

0:27:24.480 --> 0:27:26.960
<v Speaker 3>Okay, so let me maybe give you an example of both.

0:27:27.480 --> 0:27:30.840
<v Speaker 3>You know, a lot to increase in complexity in Japan

0:27:30.920 --> 0:27:35.120
<v Speaker 3>and Korea did not happen because new companies were created

0:27:35.160 --> 0:27:39.639
<v Speaker 3>to do more things, but because established companies, these chiballs

0:27:39.640 --> 0:27:43.200
<v Speaker 3>in Korea, these kde etsus in Japan, diverse to fight

0:27:43.280 --> 0:27:47.480
<v Speaker 3>internally into more things. So a company like Samson started

0:27:47.600 --> 0:27:50.840
<v Speaker 3>in sugar trading, and you know now they are the

0:27:50.960 --> 0:27:56.080
<v Speaker 3>largest producer of semiconductors and s grams and TV screens

0:27:56.160 --> 0:28:00.720
<v Speaker 3>and smartphones. That process of transformation happened inside the company,

0:28:01.119 --> 0:28:04.840
<v Speaker 3>and it happened by adding capabilities to their capabilities. So

0:28:04.880 --> 0:28:07.960
<v Speaker 3>for example, you'd say Finland is a country that had

0:28:08.000 --> 0:28:11.840
<v Speaker 3>a lot of trees, and traditional development economists would have said,

0:28:12.160 --> 0:28:14.560
<v Speaker 3>cut those trees and sell wood. And then they would say, no,

0:28:14.720 --> 0:28:17.879
<v Speaker 3>don't don't sell wood. Make furniture with that wood, or

0:28:17.920 --> 0:28:21.160
<v Speaker 3>make paper with that wood. Add value to your raw materials.

0:28:21.720 --> 0:28:24.680
<v Speaker 3>But that's not where the story really went. It's sort

0:28:24.680 --> 0:28:26.439
<v Speaker 3>of like Finland had a lot of trees, so they

0:28:26.440 --> 0:28:28.320
<v Speaker 3>have to cut the trees. But to cut the trees,

0:28:28.359 --> 0:28:31.399
<v Speaker 3>you need tools to cut trees. You need machines to

0:28:31.440 --> 0:28:34.840
<v Speaker 3>cut trees. So they became good at tools and machines

0:28:34.880 --> 0:28:38.360
<v Speaker 3>that cut wood, and from there they moved to tools

0:28:38.360 --> 0:28:41.000
<v Speaker 3>and machines that cut because not everything is made out

0:28:41.040 --> 0:28:43.120
<v Speaker 3>of wood, and from there they made they went to

0:28:43.200 --> 0:28:47.960
<v Speaker 3>automated machines that cut, because cutting everything by hand can

0:28:48.000 --> 0:28:51.160
<v Speaker 3>be either boring or imprecise. And then they said, you know,

0:28:51.280 --> 0:28:54.600
<v Speaker 3>from automated machines that cut, they want to just automated machines.

0:28:54.640 --> 0:28:56.400
<v Speaker 3>Why do we need to cut? There's more to life

0:28:56.400 --> 0:29:00.920
<v Speaker 3>than just cutting, right, And then from autumnate machines they

0:29:01.040 --> 0:29:05.600
<v Speaker 3>ended up in Nokia. So the process is a process

0:29:05.600 --> 0:29:09.320
<v Speaker 3>of adding capabilities to your capabilities, because once you know

0:29:09.400 --> 0:29:12.800
<v Speaker 3>how to do something, there is something in that cognitive

0:29:12.880 --> 0:29:16.800
<v Speaker 3>vicinity that you could do. Now. An interesting example of

0:29:16.920 --> 0:29:19.920
<v Speaker 3>going backwards is let me give you the example of

0:29:19.960 --> 0:29:24.320
<v Speaker 3>South Africa. South Africa is a country that has a

0:29:24.360 --> 0:29:29.520
<v Speaker 3>lot of coal mineral resources, and they knew how to

0:29:29.560 --> 0:29:34.560
<v Speaker 3>transform that coal into cheap electricity, and that cheap electricity

0:29:35.160 --> 0:29:39.320
<v Speaker 3>made them very competitive in mining and in metal processing

0:29:40.360 --> 0:29:45.600
<v Speaker 3>and in relatively energy intensive manufacturing. Now they messed up

0:29:45.640 --> 0:29:49.840
<v Speaker 3>their electricity company. Their electricity company lost the capacity to

0:29:49.920 --> 0:29:56.400
<v Speaker 3>sell cheap electricity, and now they not only have expensive electricity,

0:29:56.440 --> 0:30:00.120
<v Speaker 3>they have very lousy electricity with a lot of blackout

0:30:00.560 --> 0:30:04.440
<v Speaker 3>and something called load shedding, so like plan shutdowns, and

0:30:04.560 --> 0:30:09.560
<v Speaker 3>that has made manufacturing activity very very complicated, and that

0:30:09.640 --> 0:30:13.080
<v Speaker 3>has caused them to lose a lot of complexity, so

0:30:13.520 --> 0:30:17.120
<v Speaker 3>in say nineteen ninety, they have the same complexity as China,

0:30:17.720 --> 0:30:21.960
<v Speaker 3>and now China has increased its complex complexity dramatically and

0:30:22.360 --> 0:30:24.520
<v Speaker 3>South Africa has gone in the opposite record.

0:30:41.280 --> 0:30:45.680
<v Speaker 2>Since you mentioned the Japanese and Korean conglomerates just then,

0:30:46.280 --> 0:30:47.840
<v Speaker 2>that reminds me of something I want to ask you,

0:30:47.880 --> 0:30:50.800
<v Speaker 2>which is, is there a point at which there can

0:30:50.840 --> 0:30:54.680
<v Speaker 2>be too much complexity? I'm imagining, for instance, a big

0:30:54.680 --> 0:30:59.160
<v Speaker 2>company and suddenly they have their fingers in a thousand

0:30:59.240 --> 0:31:02.600
<v Speaker 2>different parts, and maybe they're okay at doing a bunch

0:31:02.640 --> 0:31:06.000
<v Speaker 2>of those things, but maybe they're not particularly good at it,

0:31:06.040 --> 0:31:09.520
<v Speaker 2>and it becomes inefficient and the sort of like lumbering

0:31:09.680 --> 0:31:13.920
<v Speaker 2>everything everywhere, all at once. Entity is that a concern

0:31:13.960 --> 0:31:16.360
<v Speaker 2>at all, either on a corporate level or on an

0:31:16.440 --> 0:31:17.560
<v Speaker 2>economy wide level.

0:31:18.760 --> 0:31:20.920
<v Speaker 3>I think it's more on a corporate level than on

0:31:20.920 --> 0:31:24.360
<v Speaker 3>an economy white level. I would say, if you're a company,

0:31:24.520 --> 0:31:28.480
<v Speaker 3>maybe you realize that there's this adjacency that you could exploit,

0:31:29.040 --> 0:31:31.720
<v Speaker 3>and maybe you start exploiting that adjacency, But then you

0:31:31.800 --> 0:31:35.960
<v Speaker 3>realize that managing the two organizations might be too complex,

0:31:36.320 --> 0:31:39.920
<v Speaker 3>so you spin it off, and spin offs sell part

0:31:40.000 --> 0:31:44.280
<v Speaker 3>so that you keep a coherent entity that's easier to manage.

0:31:44.600 --> 0:31:46.840
<v Speaker 3>That's great, But if you spun it off, it means

0:31:46.840 --> 0:31:49.240
<v Speaker 3>that somebody else bought it, and somebody else is using

0:31:49.280 --> 0:31:52.880
<v Speaker 3>that knowledge to produce those things. So I think it's

0:31:52.960 --> 0:31:56.120
<v Speaker 3>a concern for firms. How do you keep your coherence?

0:31:56.480 --> 0:31:59.959
<v Speaker 3>I would say, still explore. I think there's a lot

0:32:00.240 --> 0:32:04.520
<v Speaker 3>of value in exploring your adjacency, developing that adjacency, and

0:32:04.560 --> 0:32:07.280
<v Speaker 3>maybe spinning it off later on, and it will add

0:32:07.320 --> 0:32:10.360
<v Speaker 3>to the value of the company. At the societal level,

0:32:10.480 --> 0:32:13.840
<v Speaker 3>I don't see any evidence of that. I see societies

0:32:13.840 --> 0:32:18.080
<v Speaker 3>that are relatively small and are amazingly complex. I'll give

0:32:18.080 --> 0:32:20.840
<v Speaker 3>you the example of Slovenia. Who would have thought a

0:32:20.880 --> 0:32:24.719
<v Speaker 3>country of two million people, they export thirty five billion

0:32:24.800 --> 0:32:28.840
<v Speaker 3>dollars or more and an incredibly large diversity of things.

0:32:29.160 --> 0:32:32.760
<v Speaker 3>They're super plugged in to value chains in Austria, value

0:32:32.800 --> 0:32:37.920
<v Speaker 3>chains in Germany. In they do pretty sophisticated stuff and

0:32:38.320 --> 0:32:42.520
<v Speaker 3>with only two million people. So I don't think there's

0:32:42.680 --> 0:32:46.440
<v Speaker 3>too much limit to the growth of complexity because there

0:32:46.480 --> 0:32:49.680
<v Speaker 3>isn't that much limit to the growth of knowledge in

0:32:49.720 --> 0:32:52.360
<v Speaker 3>a society, and you don't have to be big, to

0:32:52.440 --> 0:32:55.120
<v Speaker 3>be very knowledgeable as a society.

0:32:55.360 --> 0:32:57.640
<v Speaker 1>I have so many questions. I loved your sort of

0:32:57.760 --> 0:33:01.600
<v Speaker 1>like brief industrial history of Finland. And it's like, you

0:33:01.680 --> 0:33:04.560
<v Speaker 1>go from exporting wood, then you have tools that cut wood,

0:33:04.560 --> 0:33:06.320
<v Speaker 1>then you have tools that cut, and then you have

0:33:06.400 --> 0:33:08.120
<v Speaker 1>things that do things that don't just cut, and then

0:33:08.120 --> 0:33:09.720
<v Speaker 1>you have no suddenly of no can it makes a

0:33:09.760 --> 0:33:13.760
<v Speaker 1>lot of sense you describe it. I'm curious. Generally speaking,

0:33:13.880 --> 0:33:18.120
<v Speaker 1>we've seen countries lately who are major exporters of raw

0:33:18.160 --> 0:33:22.200
<v Speaker 1>commodities attempt to move up the value chaine, so to speak,

0:33:22.640 --> 0:33:27.960
<v Speaker 1>by insisting that, say, a mining company in Indonesia can't

0:33:28.000 --> 0:33:30.000
<v Speaker 1>just come and take the nickel and sell it, that

0:33:30.040 --> 0:33:32.600
<v Speaker 1>they need to set up some sort of domestic refining

0:33:32.760 --> 0:33:36.440
<v Speaker 1>operation in Indonesia, so that something more complex than just

0:33:36.480 --> 0:33:40.520
<v Speaker 1>selling the nickel. What is your history teach us about

0:33:40.840 --> 0:33:43.520
<v Speaker 1>countries that have done a better job or not of

0:33:43.560 --> 0:33:47.080
<v Speaker 1>getting out of, say the so called resource curse. Are

0:33:47.080 --> 0:33:50.680
<v Speaker 1>there certain strategies that work better than others in terms

0:33:50.680 --> 0:33:55.440
<v Speaker 1>of a country not just being dependent on a single

0:33:55.640 --> 0:33:58.360
<v Speaker 1>commodity that does not have many adjacencies.

0:34:00.640 --> 0:34:05.000
<v Speaker 3>So let me say that one of the most passtrating

0:34:05.120 --> 0:34:08.160
<v Speaker 3>ideas in the field of economic development is the idea

0:34:08.719 --> 0:34:11.440
<v Speaker 3>that you should focus on adding value to your raw

0:34:11.480 --> 0:34:15.520
<v Speaker 3>materials because there's so much more you can do. Then

0:34:15.600 --> 0:34:18.319
<v Speaker 3>the things that can be done by relying only on

0:34:18.360 --> 0:34:22.520
<v Speaker 3>the raw materials that you happen to have. Your opportunity

0:34:22.560 --> 0:34:27.160
<v Speaker 3>set is much much wider than that. So, suppose you

0:34:27.200 --> 0:34:30.440
<v Speaker 3>have nickel, It may make a lot of sense to

0:34:30.560 --> 0:34:35.160
<v Speaker 3>process the nickel locally because when your mind something, you know,

0:34:35.320 --> 0:34:37.560
<v Speaker 3>if it's a good mind, it might have two percent

0:34:37.640 --> 0:34:41.000
<v Speaker 3>nickel or three percent nickel. So you want to separate

0:34:41.440 --> 0:34:44.799
<v Speaker 3>ninety eight ninety seven percent stuff so you don't have

0:34:44.880 --> 0:34:48.000
<v Speaker 3>to transport that much stuff that is worthless, right, so

0:34:48.080 --> 0:34:50.840
<v Speaker 3>you want to do the refining and some of the

0:34:50.880 --> 0:34:55.080
<v Speaker 3>processing nearby, just to save on transportation costs. But if

0:34:55.080 --> 0:34:59.120
<v Speaker 3>you're going to do a lithium ion battery, well you

0:34:59.200 --> 0:35:01.280
<v Speaker 3>might have the nickel, but you don't have the lithium,

0:35:01.400 --> 0:35:04.719
<v Speaker 3>you don't have the chromium, you don't have the other

0:35:04.840 --> 0:35:07.960
<v Speaker 3>minerals that go into it. So you will have some

0:35:08.120 --> 0:35:11.160
<v Speaker 3>of them, but you will have to import the other ones. Now,

0:35:11.280 --> 0:35:14.879
<v Speaker 3>think if you're trying to make a cell phone, Well,

0:35:14.920 --> 0:35:16.960
<v Speaker 3>what is the raw material that you have to have

0:35:17.080 --> 0:35:20.919
<v Speaker 3>locally that will make the cell phone, well, I mean

0:35:21.680 --> 0:35:25.360
<v Speaker 3>too many none. So if you are going to be

0:35:25.480 --> 0:35:27.759
<v Speaker 3>making cell phones, it's because you are going to be

0:35:27.800 --> 0:35:30.880
<v Speaker 3>able to connect to a bunch of value chains between

0:35:30.920 --> 0:35:34.960
<v Speaker 3>the people who are able to make the memory and

0:35:35.080 --> 0:35:40.239
<v Speaker 3>the processors and the screen and the touch screen, you know,

0:35:40.320 --> 0:35:44.120
<v Speaker 3>the surface that can detect where your finger is and

0:35:44.200 --> 0:35:48.239
<v Speaker 3>all these different parts. So that that doesn't happen in

0:35:48.280 --> 0:35:51.160
<v Speaker 3>a single company, that happens in a bunch of many companies.

0:35:51.400 --> 0:35:53.359
<v Speaker 3>So if you want to get into that kind of thing,

0:35:53.400 --> 0:35:57.319
<v Speaker 3>which might be possible. So say you are in Legos, Nigeria. Well,

0:35:57.800 --> 0:36:00.799
<v Speaker 3>Legos is a port city, so anything you need you

0:36:00.840 --> 0:36:03.040
<v Speaker 3>can bring into the port. You don't have to have

0:36:03.080 --> 0:36:05.600
<v Speaker 3>that raw material in your country. So in general, I

0:36:05.600 --> 0:36:09.000
<v Speaker 3>would say, if you have raw materials, maximize the value

0:36:09.000 --> 0:36:12.080
<v Speaker 3>of your raw materials. But most of the things that

0:36:12.120 --> 0:36:15.160
<v Speaker 3>you could do next may have nothing to do with

0:36:15.320 --> 0:36:18.960
<v Speaker 3>processing those raw materials. And the best example here is Dubai.

0:36:19.520 --> 0:36:23.000
<v Speaker 3>Dubai long many moons ago had oil, it no longer

0:36:23.040 --> 0:36:26.080
<v Speaker 3>has oil. Abu Dhabi has oil, but Dubai doesn't have

0:36:26.160 --> 0:36:29.560
<v Speaker 3>oil anymore. But Dubai has an airport that is a

0:36:29.560 --> 0:36:34.320
<v Speaker 3>major hub. It has Emmerate Airlines, which is a major airline.

0:36:34.480 --> 0:36:37.600
<v Speaker 3>It has Dubai Ports, which is a network of global ports.

0:36:37.600 --> 0:36:40.400
<v Speaker 3>It has a lot of logistics. It has the regional

0:36:40.400 --> 0:36:45.440
<v Speaker 3>headquarters of multinational corporations, It has universities where people go

0:36:45.560 --> 0:36:48.160
<v Speaker 3>to study there, et cetera. So they have added a

0:36:48.160 --> 0:36:51.160
<v Speaker 3>lot of stuff to their If you want export basket

0:36:51.760 --> 0:36:56.400
<v Speaker 3>that is super distantly related to oil, they would probably

0:36:56.440 --> 0:36:59.200
<v Speaker 3>not have gotten there had they not have oil. That

0:36:59.280 --> 0:37:02.760
<v Speaker 3>allowed them to build that infrastructure, that to build the amenities,

0:37:02.960 --> 0:37:06.520
<v Speaker 3>to build the things that are attracted and the other activities.

0:37:06.920 --> 0:37:10.399
<v Speaker 3>But they are not about oil refinding, they're not about plastics,

0:37:10.520 --> 0:37:11.719
<v Speaker 3>they're not in the value chain.

0:37:11.760 --> 0:37:17.800
<v Speaker 2>Avoid the way you described the way that diversification or

0:37:17.840 --> 0:37:21.640
<v Speaker 2>development works, this idea of monkeys jumping from tree to tree.

0:37:22.040 --> 0:37:26.960
<v Speaker 2>It sounds very naturalistic, like a natural progression of expertise.

0:37:27.000 --> 0:37:31.520
<v Speaker 2>But I'm curious what role you think government policy could

0:37:31.640 --> 0:37:35.799
<v Speaker 2>play in that process, particularly in the context of what

0:37:35.840 --> 0:37:38.440
<v Speaker 2>we see nowadays, which really seems to be a resurgence

0:37:38.560 --> 0:37:41.480
<v Speaker 2>in some parts of the world in industrial policy that

0:37:41.719 --> 0:37:46.360
<v Speaker 2>is aimed at developing specific new types of technology or capabilities.

0:37:47.600 --> 0:37:50.560
<v Speaker 3>Well, definitely, I think that the government has a lot

0:37:50.600 --> 0:37:53.600
<v Speaker 3>of useful things that it can do. First of all,

0:37:54.239 --> 0:38:01.960
<v Speaker 3>every technology, every industry lives in a environment of relatively

0:38:02.040 --> 0:38:06.359
<v Speaker 3>specific public goods that the government needs to provide. So,

0:38:06.480 --> 0:38:10.719
<v Speaker 3>for example, suppose the society adopts the car as a technology,

0:38:11.480 --> 0:38:17.640
<v Speaker 3>and for transportation, well, cars need roads, Cars need traffic rules,

0:38:18.200 --> 0:38:22.520
<v Speaker 3>Cars need traffic lights and traffic signs. They need traffic

0:38:22.600 --> 0:38:28.000
<v Speaker 3>cops to enforce those rules. So the car technology lives

0:38:28.000 --> 0:38:32.080
<v Speaker 3>in an environment of public goods that make that car useful.

0:38:32.120 --> 0:38:34.960
<v Speaker 3>A car with no roads it would be useless. A

0:38:35.040 --> 0:38:39.080
<v Speaker 3>car in roads with no rules and no traffic signs

0:38:39.080 --> 0:38:42.959
<v Speaker 3>and so on may be too dangerous. So that technology

0:38:43.000 --> 0:38:47.960
<v Speaker 3>lives in an environment of public goods. And typically governments

0:38:47.960 --> 0:38:51.520
<v Speaker 3>are pretty lousy at producing the public goods that are

0:38:51.560 --> 0:38:55.920
<v Speaker 3>needed by the industries that exist. They are typically hopeless

0:38:56.320 --> 0:38:59.279
<v Speaker 3>in producing the public goods of the industries that don't

0:38:59.360 --> 0:39:03.240
<v Speaker 3>yet exist. So if you want that industry to exist,

0:39:03.840 --> 0:39:06.040
<v Speaker 3>you need to make sure that the public goods that

0:39:06.040 --> 0:39:10.520
<v Speaker 3>that industry will require are provided. So, for example, it's

0:39:10.680 --> 0:39:15.719
<v Speaker 3>going to be extremely difficult to sell electric vehicles in

0:39:15.760 --> 0:39:19.439
<v Speaker 3>a society that cannot assure people that they are going

0:39:19.520 --> 0:39:23.520
<v Speaker 3>to be charging stations, but nobody is going to build

0:39:23.600 --> 0:39:27.960
<v Speaker 3>charging stations for a market of electric vehicles that does

0:39:28.000 --> 0:39:34.440
<v Speaker 3>not yet exist. So these things can be addressed through policy,

0:39:34.520 --> 0:39:38.560
<v Speaker 3>these chicken and egg problems, these coordination problems, this provision

0:39:38.600 --> 0:39:41.920
<v Speaker 3>of public goods that industries are going to need. For example,

0:39:41.960 --> 0:39:48.040
<v Speaker 3>suppose that you want to export a fresh blueberries the

0:39:48.080 --> 0:39:51.880
<v Speaker 3>way Peru does, Okay, and they're the major exporter of

0:39:51.920 --> 0:39:54.719
<v Speaker 3>blueberries these days. An industry that started in Chile and

0:39:54.760 --> 0:39:57.560
<v Speaker 3>then moved to Argentina and now it's in Peru. Well,

0:39:57.600 --> 0:40:01.279
<v Speaker 3>you cannot export fresh produce if you do not have

0:40:02.000 --> 0:40:05.080
<v Speaker 3>a green lane in customs, if you don't have a

0:40:05.320 --> 0:40:08.919
<v Speaker 3>cold storage transportation chain what they call a cold chain,

0:40:09.640 --> 0:40:13.600
<v Speaker 3>if you don't have fit to sanitary agreements with the market,

0:40:13.719 --> 0:40:17.319
<v Speaker 3>you're going to be selling this stuff too. So that

0:40:17.440 --> 0:40:20.040
<v Speaker 3>industry is only going to exist in the context of

0:40:20.080 --> 0:40:24.480
<v Speaker 3>these public goods that make that industry feasible. So I

0:40:24.520 --> 0:40:27.840
<v Speaker 3>think governments have to engage in the nitty gritty of

0:40:27.880 --> 0:40:32.160
<v Speaker 3>the public goods that new industries need, and they'll have

0:40:32.200 --> 0:40:35.799
<v Speaker 3>to get engaged in the nitty gritty of chicken and

0:40:35.840 --> 0:40:39.319
<v Speaker 3>egg problems. Even within the private sector that could like

0:40:39.520 --> 0:40:41.920
<v Speaker 3>the example I gave you of the charging stations and

0:40:41.960 --> 0:40:46.480
<v Speaker 3>the eeds so that markets are able to develop. So

0:40:46.600 --> 0:40:50.399
<v Speaker 3>I do think that there's an important contributing role that

0:40:50.600 --> 0:40:53.680
<v Speaker 3>industrial policies can play to facilitate monkeys moving.

0:40:54.560 --> 0:40:57.200
<v Speaker 2>I have just one more question, which is a very

0:40:57.200 --> 0:41:00.440
<v Speaker 2>important one. How good are you at trade all the

0:41:00.440 --> 0:41:02.480
<v Speaker 2>fact that you know that Peru is one of the

0:41:02.520 --> 0:41:04.800
<v Speaker 2>biggest exporters of blueberries nowadays?

0:41:04.880 --> 0:41:07.879
<v Speaker 1>Is it just super nice history of which countries where

0:41:07.960 --> 0:41:09.560
<v Speaker 1>the blueberry exporters in the past.

0:41:11.480 --> 0:41:15.640
<v Speaker 3>Well, I mean it's a bit unfair. This is my

0:41:15.760 --> 0:41:18.880
<v Speaker 3>day job, this is what I do, so it's not

0:41:18.920 --> 0:41:21.000
<v Speaker 3>on my hobby. So this is what I think about

0:41:21.040 --> 0:41:21.440
<v Speaker 3>all day.

0:41:22.000 --> 0:41:25.279
<v Speaker 1>We talk a lot about and trade again, goods exports,

0:41:25.320 --> 0:41:27.280
<v Speaker 1>and there's a really good reason to look at exports

0:41:27.320 --> 0:41:29.759
<v Speaker 1>because there's that sort of like discipline of like you

0:41:29.800 --> 0:41:32.520
<v Speaker 1>can't force another country to buy your goods, and so

0:41:32.800 --> 0:41:35.720
<v Speaker 1>like looking at goods exports is really interesting. I'm curious

0:41:35.760 --> 0:41:39.719
<v Speaker 1>about work you've done of looking at services through the

0:41:39.719 --> 0:41:43.759
<v Speaker 1>complexity lens and can countries rise up and become rich

0:41:44.120 --> 0:41:47.040
<v Speaker 1>if they never go through the manufacturing process, because as

0:41:47.080 --> 0:41:49.879
<v Speaker 1>you talk about, you know, manufacturing links all different kinds

0:41:49.880 --> 0:41:54.120
<v Speaker 1>of things supply chains, ports, electricity systems, cutting, and various

0:41:54.120 --> 0:41:56.840
<v Speaker 1>things like that. Can it be done through the services.

0:41:56.480 --> 0:41:58.920
<v Speaker 3>Room, I think? So let me give you the example

0:41:59.000 --> 0:42:02.480
<v Speaker 3>of Panama. Panama had a canal and the canal was

0:42:02.560 --> 0:42:05.120
<v Speaker 3>run by the Americans, and the Americans just wanted the

0:42:05.120 --> 0:42:07.840
<v Speaker 3>ships to go through. So when the Panama can became

0:42:07.920 --> 0:42:14.320
<v Speaker 3>Panamanian in nineteen ninety seven, so they started to think, okay,

0:42:14.360 --> 0:42:16.160
<v Speaker 3>what can we do with the canal. Well, we want

0:42:16.239 --> 0:42:18.800
<v Speaker 3>the ships to not just go through, but to stop,

0:42:18.800 --> 0:42:22.239
<v Speaker 3>So let's build some ports. Maybe, let's do some logistics,

0:42:22.280 --> 0:42:25.920
<v Speaker 3>some transshipment. They said, well, what do these people need?

0:42:25.960 --> 0:42:29.840
<v Speaker 3>They need a financial services, so why don't we create

0:42:29.880 --> 0:42:33.600
<v Speaker 3>an offshore financial center. And then they decided, you know what,

0:42:33.800 --> 0:42:38.240
<v Speaker 3>why don't we become a hub for regional multinational headquarters.

0:42:38.400 --> 0:42:42.840
<v Speaker 3>And they happened to stumble into having a very successful airline,

0:42:42.920 --> 0:42:45.760
<v Speaker 3>Copa Airline. It's the more successful company in the region.

0:42:46.160 --> 0:42:50.560
<v Speaker 3>So that made having regional headquarters and multinational corporations very

0:42:50.600 --> 0:42:53.760
<v Speaker 3>practical because from Panama City you can go to anywhere

0:42:53.760 --> 0:42:55.880
<v Speaker 3>in Latin America and the US and a bunch of

0:42:55.920 --> 0:43:00.520
<v Speaker 3>other destinations. So suddenly you have a bunch of people.

0:43:00.760 --> 0:43:04.480
<v Speaker 3>They have some forty thousand people who work at multinational

0:43:04.520 --> 0:43:08.640
<v Speaker 3>corporations under special visas that work in Panama, and they

0:43:08.680 --> 0:43:14.239
<v Speaker 3>want to have amenities, restaurants and museums, cultural activities, good schools,

0:43:14.320 --> 0:43:18.680
<v Speaker 3>good healthcare. So guess what. You become a good destination

0:43:18.800 --> 0:43:21.560
<v Speaker 3>to attract other people and other talent, and you become

0:43:21.600 --> 0:43:24.600
<v Speaker 3>a good tourist destination. So in the example I've just

0:43:24.640 --> 0:43:28.160
<v Speaker 3>given you, it's a bunch of service industries that are

0:43:28.200 --> 0:43:31.000
<v Speaker 3>connected to each other. And by the way, Panama is

0:43:31.000 --> 0:43:33.480
<v Speaker 3>the country in Latin America that has had this has

0:43:33.520 --> 0:43:35.280
<v Speaker 3>dispost over the last thirty years.

0:43:35.520 --> 0:43:39.200
<v Speaker 1>I realized I have one more really important question that

0:43:39.280 --> 0:43:41.680
<v Speaker 1>we can't leave a I'm curious, like you have new

0:43:41.719 --> 0:43:44.279
<v Speaker 1>research out, So is there anything that jumps out at

0:43:44.280 --> 0:43:46.080
<v Speaker 1>you right now in terms of which countries are on

0:43:46.160 --> 0:43:48.680
<v Speaker 1>the move, what is the big picture trends in her

0:43:49.040 --> 0:43:52.160
<v Speaker 1>who's moving? And like what is happening here in the

0:43:52.239 --> 0:43:55.080
<v Speaker 1>richest country in the world, or I think are pretty

0:43:55.080 --> 0:43:59.080
<v Speaker 1>close to it in terms of trends in our own complexity.

0:43:59.080 --> 0:44:03.440
<v Speaker 3>Here. First of all, let me invite your listeners to

0:44:03.520 --> 0:44:07.040
<v Speaker 3>all visit the aplus of economic complexity we have just

0:44:07.160 --> 0:44:09.920
<v Speaker 3>updated it with twenty twenty one data and we run

0:44:10.120 --> 0:44:14.680
<v Speaker 3>growth projections for the following decade, and there you'll find

0:44:14.719 --> 0:44:20.120
<v Speaker 3>that countries like China, Vietnam, Uganda, India, we expect to

0:44:20.160 --> 0:44:22.799
<v Speaker 3>be growing a lot. The US has had in the

0:44:22.840 --> 0:44:26.200
<v Speaker 3>past a very significant decline in its complexity, and you

0:44:26.239 --> 0:44:29.200
<v Speaker 3>see it a little bit in how reliant the US

0:44:29.360 --> 0:44:32.959
<v Speaker 3>is on value chains outside the US, even for sophisticated

0:44:33.040 --> 0:44:37.480
<v Speaker 3>products like semiconductors and stuff. So in our current research,

0:44:37.560 --> 0:44:42.000
<v Speaker 3>we're also exploring a major change that is coming that

0:44:42.040 --> 0:44:45.160
<v Speaker 3>we know is coming, it's in the process, it's already happening,

0:44:45.520 --> 0:44:51.000
<v Speaker 3>which is this decarbonization process. What is de carbonization going

0:44:51.080 --> 0:44:54.360
<v Speaker 3>to do to the world, to global economy. Obviously, countries

0:44:54.400 --> 0:44:57.520
<v Speaker 3>that export oil and natural gas and coal are going

0:44:57.520 --> 0:45:00.439
<v Speaker 3>to face headwinds, But countries are going to to need

0:45:00.680 --> 0:45:06.080
<v Speaker 3>solar panels and windmills and fertilizers that are green and electoralizers,

0:45:06.120 --> 0:45:08.680
<v Speaker 3>and so there's a lot of stuff that will be growing.

0:45:09.400 --> 0:45:13.080
<v Speaker 3>So the structure of global demand will be shifting, and

0:45:13.160 --> 0:45:15.719
<v Speaker 3>we're trying to exploit ways in which we can help

0:45:15.760 --> 0:45:19.720
<v Speaker 3>countries figure out how they can grow in a world

0:45:19.719 --> 0:45:23.000
<v Speaker 3>that is attempting to decarbonize, and that is a very

0:45:23.040 --> 0:45:25.680
<v Speaker 3>different frame from the current frame. The current frame is

0:45:26.040 --> 0:45:29.360
<v Speaker 3>countries are being asked by the Paris Agreement, tell me

0:45:29.400 --> 0:45:34.520
<v Speaker 3>what are your commitments to lower your emissions. In our framework,

0:45:34.680 --> 0:45:38.240
<v Speaker 3>we are asking countries, look, the world wants to decarbonize.

0:45:38.360 --> 0:45:42.279
<v Speaker 3>What can your country do to enable the rest of

0:45:42.320 --> 0:45:45.120
<v Speaker 3>the world to buy the things that they will need

0:45:45.160 --> 0:45:49.480
<v Speaker 3>to decarbonize. Those are going to be your export industries.

0:45:49.560 --> 0:45:52.360
<v Speaker 3>Those are going to be the large, fast growing products

0:45:52.360 --> 0:45:55.160
<v Speaker 3>of the future. How can you get into them? And

0:45:55.239 --> 0:45:58.040
<v Speaker 3>we are putting that in the context of our product

0:45:58.040 --> 0:46:00.360
<v Speaker 3>space and our methods, et cetera, to figure out to

0:46:00.400 --> 0:46:04.560
<v Speaker 3>help countries figure out paths to growth that will help

0:46:04.600 --> 0:46:05.040
<v Speaker 3>the world of.

0:46:05.040 --> 0:46:09.040
<v Speaker 1>Carbonis Ricardo Houseman. This was such a great conversation. Can

0:46:09.080 --> 0:46:11.319
<v Speaker 1>we do a live episode with you at some point

0:46:11.320 --> 0:46:14.680
<v Speaker 1>where people just throw goods and countries at you and

0:46:14.719 --> 0:46:17.200
<v Speaker 1>we on stage and you just sort of tell a

0:46:17.200 --> 0:46:20.640
<v Speaker 1>little bit of competition. Can we can we do that

0:46:20.680 --> 0:46:22.080
<v Speaker 1>at some point in the future, will come to you

0:46:22.120 --> 0:46:23.680
<v Speaker 1>wherever you are and make it happen. I think it

0:46:23.680 --> 0:46:24.799
<v Speaker 1>would be really a lot of fun.

0:46:25.840 --> 0:46:27.360
<v Speaker 3>I would definitely have fun.

0:46:27.480 --> 0:46:30.280
<v Speaker 1>Okay, I'm so. I actually had tons of more questions

0:46:30.360 --> 0:46:34.240
<v Speaker 1>like how random like little islands become like helicopter export hubs.

0:46:34.280 --> 0:46:37.440
<v Speaker 1>But this was so great. Really appreciate you coming on.

0:46:37.640 --> 0:46:40.680
<v Speaker 1>Fascinating conversation. Thank you so much for coming on outline.

0:46:41.160 --> 0:46:42.399
<v Speaker 3>Thank you, thank you, thank you.

0:46:42.360 --> 0:46:57.480
<v Speaker 1>For having me, Tracy. I really want to do that

0:46:57.520 --> 0:46:59.600
<v Speaker 1>where we get Ricardo out of stage and someone goes,

0:46:59.600 --> 0:47:02.360
<v Speaker 1>like men's suits, and then he tell us the history

0:47:02.400 --> 0:47:04.680
<v Speaker 1>of like which country is sell the most men's suits,

0:47:04.719 --> 0:47:06.760
<v Speaker 1>so what they used to sell, and why one country

0:47:07.000 --> 0:47:12.080
<v Speaker 1>stopped because they started producing some get the soccer cleats

0:47:12.360 --> 0:47:14.480
<v Speaker 1>whatever it is, and which are whatever it is. I

0:47:14.480 --> 0:47:15.680
<v Speaker 1>think that would be really fun.

0:47:15.680 --> 0:47:20.120
<v Speaker 2>The evolution of those manufacturing and lunch capabilities. I will

0:47:20.120 --> 0:47:22.399
<v Speaker 2>say that, I think for the rest of my days,

0:47:22.440 --> 0:47:25.160
<v Speaker 2>whenever I think of economic development and diversification, I'm going

0:47:25.239 --> 0:47:29.440
<v Speaker 2>to be envisioning monkeys swinging from tree to treat a tree.

0:47:29.520 --> 0:47:32.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, grabbing all these I love it. Such a vivid

0:47:32.080 --> 0:47:35.080
<v Speaker 1>image of how like an economic ecosystem works.

0:47:35.200 --> 0:47:35.359
<v Speaker 3>Now.

0:47:35.520 --> 0:47:37.440
<v Speaker 1>I really enjoyed that. And it's sort of like all

0:47:37.520 --> 0:47:39.960
<v Speaker 1>these things that like sort of like a bunch of

0:47:39.960 --> 0:47:41.320
<v Speaker 1>things clicked in that conversation.

0:47:41.640 --> 0:47:44.279
<v Speaker 2>Well, here's the most important question. Do you think it's

0:47:44.280 --> 0:47:46.360
<v Speaker 2>going to help you be better at trade all No,

0:47:46.520 --> 0:47:47.160
<v Speaker 2>because I'm not.

0:47:47.120 --> 0:47:50.719
<v Speaker 1>Good at geography, and so like maybe I don't know,

0:47:50.840 --> 0:47:52.560
<v Speaker 1>maybe it will. I think I just need to study

0:47:52.560 --> 0:47:52.919
<v Speaker 1>the map.

0:47:53.000 --> 0:47:54.200
<v Speaker 2>You don't need the geography.

0:47:54.320 --> 0:47:54.480
<v Speaker 3>Hint.

0:47:54.600 --> 0:47:56.680
<v Speaker 2>If you get it in your first go, Joe, that's

0:47:56.719 --> 0:47:57.759
<v Speaker 2>what you should be aiming for.

0:47:58.160 --> 0:47:58.360
<v Speaker 3>You know.

0:47:58.400 --> 0:48:01.160
<v Speaker 1>What I thought was really interesting was like this idea

0:48:01.280 --> 0:48:04.480
<v Speaker 1>of like getting out of the resource curse is not

0:48:04.560 --> 0:48:08.000
<v Speaker 1>as straightforward as just oh, we're going to do more

0:48:08.040 --> 0:48:10.120
<v Speaker 1>with the thing that we already sell. So yeah, and

0:48:10.160 --> 0:48:13.399
<v Speaker 1>his point about Dubai was really interesting, how like there

0:48:13.400 --> 0:48:16.040
<v Speaker 1>are things that might go into selling a resource, like

0:48:16.320 --> 0:48:20.320
<v Speaker 1>having a port or having cold storage chain, or certain

0:48:20.360 --> 0:48:23.880
<v Speaker 1>things that aren't necessarily the thing itself, and that often

0:48:23.960 --> 0:48:26.680
<v Speaker 1>these sort of like the new trajectory of development may

0:48:26.719 --> 0:48:29.360
<v Speaker 1>not be that thing, but some of the other goods

0:48:29.360 --> 0:48:31.440
<v Speaker 1>and services that went into making the thing.

0:48:31.840 --> 0:48:35.200
<v Speaker 2>Well, the other thing that is sort of important in

0:48:35.320 --> 0:48:40.040
<v Speaker 2>that conversation is the idea of governments making specific decisions

0:48:40.080 --> 0:48:42.840
<v Speaker 2>about this, and that certainly comes into play with Dubai.

0:48:42.920 --> 0:48:46.520
<v Speaker 2>You know, Dubai made a very conscious decision acknowledged that

0:48:46.719 --> 0:48:49.160
<v Speaker 2>it wouldn't have oil forever and so it needed to

0:48:49.200 --> 0:48:52.239
<v Speaker 2>diversify its economy and then proceeded to do so. I

0:48:52.320 --> 0:48:55.000
<v Speaker 2>think it's true in places like South Korea that also

0:48:55.040 --> 0:48:57.879
<v Speaker 2>score very high on complexity nowadays, they had a lot

0:48:57.920 --> 0:49:02.240
<v Speaker 2>of different types of industrial paul and also media policy, yeah,

0:49:02.320 --> 0:49:06.319
<v Speaker 2>to make k pop a thing, which we've discussed previously

0:49:06.520 --> 0:49:10.160
<v Speaker 2>on the show, and even some small island nations that

0:49:10.239 --> 0:49:13.359
<v Speaker 2>become helicopter manufacturers. To your point, Joe, I think there's

0:49:13.360 --> 0:49:15.200
<v Speaker 2>a lot of direction taking place there as well.

0:49:15.560 --> 0:49:17.640
<v Speaker 1>The world is so interesting now. I think I'm going

0:49:17.680 --> 0:49:19.719
<v Speaker 1>to spend the rest of the day looking at the

0:49:19.760 --> 0:49:22.560
<v Speaker 1>atlas of economic complexity and just like clicking from country

0:49:22.560 --> 0:49:23.040
<v Speaker 1>to country.

0:49:23.120 --> 0:49:26.200
<v Speaker 2>It is really fun. And I know Ricardo spoke about this,

0:49:26.360 --> 0:49:30.080
<v Speaker 2>but you can look at sort of suggestions or feasible

0:49:30.080 --> 0:49:33.960
<v Speaker 2>opportunities for future economic development, which is really really fun.

0:49:34.320 --> 0:49:37.000
<v Speaker 1>That is really fun. And maybe I just might memorize

0:49:37.000 --> 0:49:39.040
<v Speaker 1>every single one so that I could get all the

0:49:39.040 --> 0:49:39.799
<v Speaker 1>tradells in one.

0:49:40.000 --> 0:49:42.600
<v Speaker 2>Do we need to do competitive trade all competition?

0:49:42.680 --> 0:49:42.879
<v Speaker 3>Yes?

0:49:43.120 --> 0:49:45.359
<v Speaker 2>I think that should be our next live event. All right,

0:49:45.400 --> 0:49:47.640
<v Speaker 2>shall we leave it there, Let's leave it there. This

0:49:47.680 --> 0:49:50.560
<v Speaker 2>has been another episode of the ad Thoughts podcast. I'm

0:49:50.560 --> 0:49:53.160
<v Speaker 2>Tracy Alloway. You can follow me on Twitter at Tracy

0:49:53.160 --> 0:49:54.160
<v Speaker 2>Alloway and.

0:49:54.160 --> 0:49:57.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm Joe Wisenthal. You can follow me on Twitter at

0:49:57.160 --> 0:50:00.799
<v Speaker 1>the Stalwart. Follow our guest Ricardo Houseman on Twitter. He's

0:50:00.880 --> 0:50:05.359
<v Speaker 1>at Ricardo Underscore Houseman. Follow our producers Carman Rodriguez at

0:50:05.440 --> 0:50:09.680
<v Speaker 1>Carmen Arman and Dash Bennett at Dashbot. And check out

0:50:09.680 --> 0:50:13.120
<v Speaker 1>all of our podcasts at Bloomberg under the handle at podcasts.

0:50:13.239 --> 0:50:15.680
<v Speaker 1>And for more odd Lots content, go to Bloomberg dot

0:50:15.680 --> 0:50:19.480
<v Speaker 1>com slash odd Lots, where we have transcripts, a blog

0:50:19.520 --> 0:50:23.279
<v Speaker 1>in a newsletter, and we have a trade all room

0:50:23.480 --> 0:50:27.080
<v Speaker 1>in the discord where you Discord dot gg slash odd

0:50:27.160 --> 0:50:29.200
<v Speaker 1>Lots listeners are in their twenty four to seven talk

0:50:29.239 --> 0:50:31.759
<v Speaker 1>about all these topics, and there is a room where

0:50:31.800 --> 0:50:34.279
<v Speaker 1>everyone posts how they did on the Trader that day.

0:50:34.640 --> 0:50:37.919
<v Speaker 1>So a play the Trade oll and b post your scores.

0:50:37.880 --> 0:50:40.319
<v Speaker 2>And if you enjoy all thoughts, please leave us a

0:50:40.400 --> 0:50:44.120
<v Speaker 2>positive review on your favorite podcast platform. Thanks for listening,