WEBVTT - Canada Tops China for Battery Supply Chain Potential

0:00:00.360 --> 0:00:03.160
<v Speaker 1>This is Dana Perkins and you're listening to Switched on

0:00:03.400 --> 0:00:06.760
<v Speaker 1>the BNAF podcast. Which countries in the world are doing

0:00:06.800 --> 0:00:10.840
<v Speaker 1>the best job of building a secure, reliable and sustainable

0:00:10.960 --> 0:00:14.360
<v Speaker 1>lithium ion battery supply chain. As we know, lithium ion

0:00:14.400 --> 0:00:17.160
<v Speaker 1>batteries are an important part of the energy transition. They

0:00:17.200 --> 0:00:20.560
<v Speaker 1>provide everything from flexibility for wind and solar to the

0:00:20.600 --> 0:00:23.959
<v Speaker 1>batteries that are found in electric vehicles and so much

0:00:24.000 --> 0:00:27.760
<v Speaker 1>more so. Earlier this year, BNAF released the fourth edition

0:00:28.000 --> 0:00:31.280
<v Speaker 1>of our Global Lithium ion Battery Supply Chain Ranking. We

0:00:31.400 --> 0:00:34.879
<v Speaker 1>rank the top thirty countries using forty six metrics across

0:00:35.040 --> 0:00:38.040
<v Speaker 1>five categories, and we take into account things like the

0:00:38.080 --> 0:00:43.000
<v Speaker 1>sourcing of raw materials, battery manufacturing capacity, downstream demand, environmental,

0:00:43.040 --> 0:00:46.800
<v Speaker 1>social and governance factors as well as innovation. So on

0:00:46.880 --> 0:00:50.400
<v Speaker 1>today's show we speak with Eli Gomas Calous and Quisiampofo

0:00:50.560 --> 0:00:52.879
<v Speaker 1>from b and EF's Medals and Mining team, and in

0:00:52.920 --> 0:00:55.440
<v Speaker 1>addition to the ranking, they get into the last year's

0:00:55.480 --> 0:00:58.760
<v Speaker 1>collapse of lithium prices as well as the impact that

0:00:58.800 --> 0:01:02.600
<v Speaker 1>Indonesia has had on the global nickel market. To access

0:01:02.720 --> 0:01:05.959
<v Speaker 1>this latest edition of the Global Lithium Ion Battery Supply

0:01:06.040 --> 0:01:08.600
<v Speaker 1>Chain Ranking. B and EF subscribers can find it on

0:01:08.720 --> 0:01:11.320
<v Speaker 1>b and EF dot com or at BNF on the

0:01:11.360 --> 0:01:14.760
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg terminal. Subscribe to the show to receive updates for

0:01:14.840 --> 0:01:17.760
<v Speaker 1>future episodes, and consider giving us a review to help

0:01:17.800 --> 0:01:20.160
<v Speaker 1>share us with others. But right now, let's jump into

0:01:20.160 --> 0:01:33.280
<v Speaker 1>our conversation with Ellie and Quasy. Ellie, thank you for

0:01:33.319 --> 0:01:34.279
<v Speaker 1>coming back on the show.

0:01:34.360 --> 0:01:35.399
<v Speaker 2>Thank you for having me again.

0:01:35.480 --> 0:01:37.920
<v Speaker 1>Dana and Cozy, good to have you here again too.

0:01:38.160 --> 0:01:39.520
<v Speaker 3>Thank you for having me again, Dana.

0:01:39.720 --> 0:01:43.000
<v Speaker 1>So we're here today to talk about the Global Lithium

0:01:43.040 --> 0:01:46.520
<v Speaker 1>ion Battery Supply Chain Ranking, our own version of the

0:01:46.560 --> 0:01:50.680
<v Speaker 1>OSCARS for metal. So the name is on the tin

0:01:51.160 --> 0:01:53.840
<v Speaker 1>in that we're talking about the supply chains for all

0:01:53.880 --> 0:01:56.800
<v Speaker 1>of the things that go into batteries with the metals specifically.

0:01:57.000 --> 0:01:59.640
<v Speaker 1>But let's just have a moment for talking about who

0:01:59.680 --> 0:02:02.200
<v Speaker 1>was in the running, who the nominees were for these oscars,

0:02:02.200 --> 0:02:05.600
<v Speaker 1>if you will. How many countries were we reviewing when

0:02:05.640 --> 0:02:07.560
<v Speaker 1>we set out to make this ranking.

0:02:07.760 --> 0:02:11.640
<v Speaker 2>So unlike the Oscars, it wasn't just six, seven or

0:02:11.680 --> 0:02:14.519
<v Speaker 2>eight nominees. Each year, we look at thirty countries and

0:02:15.120 --> 0:02:19.040
<v Speaker 2>judge their potential to form a secure, unreliable and sustainable

0:02:19.080 --> 0:02:20.120
<v Speaker 2>battery supply chain.

0:02:20.440 --> 0:02:23.640
<v Speaker 1>Now, rather than make everybody wait for us to open

0:02:23.639 --> 0:02:26.960
<v Speaker 1>the envelope, let's just get right into who the winner

0:02:27.120 --> 0:02:29.560
<v Speaker 1>was and let me take a guess. Because on this show,

0:02:29.600 --> 0:02:32.640
<v Speaker 1>the last couple of episodes, we've been talking about China

0:02:32.760 --> 0:02:36.680
<v Speaker 1>dominating the electric vehicles market and the solar module market.

0:02:36.800 --> 0:02:38.280
<v Speaker 1>So is it China?

0:02:38.880 --> 0:02:39.680
<v Speaker 2>No? No?

0:02:40.040 --> 0:02:42.440
<v Speaker 1>All right? So who? Yeah? Who came out on top?

0:02:42.639 --> 0:02:46.240
<v Speaker 2>So it's undeniable that China leads the current supply chain.

0:02:46.320 --> 0:02:48.200
<v Speaker 2>But the purpose of the ranking is to try and

0:02:48.440 --> 0:02:52.600
<v Speaker 2>understand and see what countries canform supply chains for the future.

0:02:52.840 --> 0:02:56.040
<v Speaker 2>And with that in mind, Canada actually came out on top.

0:02:56.520 --> 0:02:58.880
<v Speaker 2>So the difference is with the ranking is that we

0:02:58.919 --> 0:03:01.280
<v Speaker 2>don't only look at the but we look at the future.

0:03:01.360 --> 0:03:06.079
<v Speaker 2>So we include two categories ESG Credentials and Industry Innovation

0:03:06.400 --> 0:03:09.520
<v Speaker 2>and Infrastructure, And the inclusion of these help us look

0:03:09.520 --> 0:03:11.880
<v Speaker 2>to the future because supply chains will need to be

0:03:11.960 --> 0:03:15.200
<v Speaker 2>more sustainable as we go towards net zero, and also

0:03:15.280 --> 0:03:17.520
<v Speaker 2>because demand is going to grow very quickly, so do

0:03:17.560 --> 0:03:20.800
<v Speaker 2>these countries have the supporting sectors in place to be

0:03:20.880 --> 0:03:22.920
<v Speaker 2>able to support the growth in supply chains.

0:03:23.120 --> 0:03:26.200
<v Speaker 1>So let's take a moment on ESG, so environmental, social

0:03:26.280 --> 0:03:29.280
<v Speaker 1>and governance factors. What do we mean by that in

0:03:29.280 --> 0:03:34.120
<v Speaker 1>this context because that term gets reapplied to so many things,

0:03:34.400 --> 0:03:37.320
<v Speaker 1>and we Bloomberg try and have quite a strict definition

0:03:37.840 --> 0:03:40.920
<v Speaker 1>what does ESG mean for us in this specific context.

0:03:41.360 --> 0:03:44.800
<v Speaker 2>So in the ranking, we include around ten ESG metrics

0:03:44.840 --> 0:03:47.800
<v Speaker 2>are split between each of the three sub sectors, and

0:03:48.120 --> 0:03:50.720
<v Speaker 2>we look at most of the ESG metrics on the

0:03:50.760 --> 0:03:54.200
<v Speaker 2>country level, so we look at things like carbon pricing,

0:03:54.560 --> 0:03:57.840
<v Speaker 2>environmental health of their ecosystems, as well as looking at

0:03:57.840 --> 0:04:01.560
<v Speaker 2>the control of corruption and government effectiveness within the region.

0:04:01.800 --> 0:04:04.280
<v Speaker 2>So with the rankings, a lot of what we do

0:04:04.360 --> 0:04:07.160
<v Speaker 2>focuses on the country in that sense.

0:04:07.600 --> 0:04:09.760
<v Speaker 3>Then also, I think one thing out our day naristat

0:04:10.040 --> 0:04:13.440
<v Speaker 3>So the methodology overall was developed with the industry. So

0:04:13.480 --> 0:04:16.920
<v Speaker 3>it's essentially what companies are saying in their boardrooms, what

0:04:17.360 --> 0:04:20.680
<v Speaker 3>the supply chain industry is discussing. So when we select

0:04:20.839 --> 0:04:24.119
<v Speaker 3>the criteria, particularly with respect to ESG, it was really

0:04:24.200 --> 0:04:26.560
<v Speaker 3>dozed at the auto companies as well as the mining

0:04:26.600 --> 0:04:29.400
<v Speaker 3>companies and governments are talking about that matters to them.

0:04:29.440 --> 0:04:31.080
<v Speaker 3>In order to dominate the supply chain.

0:04:31.200 --> 0:04:33.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, because we did a previous episode where we were

0:04:33.480 --> 0:04:37.520
<v Speaker 1>talking about the use of blockchain and verifying minds and

0:04:37.560 --> 0:04:39.719
<v Speaker 1>some of their social practices. It would kind of go

0:04:39.800 --> 0:04:42.279
<v Speaker 1>into how they treat workers. So there's a wide basket

0:04:42.320 --> 0:04:45.159
<v Speaker 1>of things, but a bit specifically related to metals and mining.

0:04:45.200 --> 0:04:49.040
<v Speaker 1>Here you brought in ten important factors for this industry.

0:04:49.279 --> 0:04:52.920
<v Speaker 1>So going back to the winner of this particular ranking,

0:04:52.920 --> 0:04:56.719
<v Speaker 1>which isn't necessarily where the majority of the refining capacity is,

0:04:56.720 --> 0:04:58.719
<v Speaker 1>but where it comes out on top when we're actually

0:04:58.760 --> 0:05:02.560
<v Speaker 1>considering some of these different things like ESG. What does

0:05:02.600 --> 0:05:04.960
<v Speaker 1>it take to come out on top? So you've gone

0:05:05.000 --> 0:05:08.680
<v Speaker 1>through these various areas that went into the ranking, but

0:05:08.839 --> 0:05:12.680
<v Speaker 1>essentially where does Canada really excel? Are they across the

0:05:12.720 --> 0:05:15.839
<v Speaker 1>board or is there one specific area where really kind

0:05:15.839 --> 0:05:17.240
<v Speaker 1>of set them over the edge.

0:05:17.520 --> 0:05:21.200
<v Speaker 2>So Canada doesn't actually place in first position across any

0:05:21.200 --> 0:05:24.479
<v Speaker 2>of the categories that we judge, but what they do

0:05:24.480 --> 0:05:27.039
<v Speaker 2>do really well is that they have a consistent top

0:05:27.080 --> 0:05:30.120
<v Speaker 2>ten performance across all of the five key categories, and

0:05:30.440 --> 0:05:33.120
<v Speaker 2>ensuring that they can perform to a decent and sodid

0:05:33.160 --> 0:05:36.320
<v Speaker 2>level across various different parts of supply chain has helped

0:05:36.360 --> 0:05:38.680
<v Speaker 2>them get to first place. This is a fourth edition

0:05:38.720 --> 0:05:40.679
<v Speaker 2>of the ranking, and what we've seen over the past

0:05:40.680 --> 0:05:44.280
<v Speaker 2>two is in every single category they've continuously improved. So

0:05:44.279 --> 0:05:47.120
<v Speaker 2>it's a combination of the consistency across the categories, but

0:05:47.200 --> 0:05:49.680
<v Speaker 2>also the continuous improvement that has helped them get to

0:05:49.680 --> 0:05:50.480
<v Speaker 2>where they are today.

0:05:50.680 --> 0:05:53.080
<v Speaker 1>So they're an all rounder. Well, let's talk a little

0:05:53.080 --> 0:05:56.040
<v Speaker 1>bit about the different geographic split then, if we will.

0:05:56.120 --> 0:05:59.680
<v Speaker 1>Among those thirty countries, were they all centered in certain

0:05:59.680 --> 0:06:02.200
<v Speaker 1>parts of the world or is this some really global

0:06:02.200 --> 0:06:02.800
<v Speaker 1>supply chain.

0:06:03.200 --> 0:06:05.280
<v Speaker 3>I think it's very global. One of the key things

0:06:05.279 --> 0:06:08.440
<v Speaker 3>we should highlight is that we picked thirty countries out

0:06:08.440 --> 0:06:10.800
<v Speaker 3>of over one hundred and ninety countries. So if you're

0:06:10.839 --> 0:06:13.719
<v Speaker 3>in this ranking, you're probably already a winner. So I mean,

0:06:13.839 --> 0:06:16.800
<v Speaker 3>going back to your scarce analogy, you've probably have won

0:06:16.880 --> 0:06:19.320
<v Speaker 3>award an award in one of the five categories that

0:06:19.360 --> 0:06:21.839
<v Speaker 3>we mentioned if you're in the top thirty arm In

0:06:21.920 --> 0:06:24.040
<v Speaker 3>terms of the regional split, we wanted it to be

0:06:24.160 --> 0:06:26.839
<v Speaker 3>very global. Obviously, you're going to find that in most

0:06:26.920 --> 0:06:29.560
<v Speaker 3>of pretty much every region around the world. We did

0:06:29.560 --> 0:06:31.919
<v Speaker 3>include some countries, so they are quite a number of

0:06:31.920 --> 0:06:34.719
<v Speaker 3>countries in Europe, and for us, a minimum criteria to

0:06:34.800 --> 0:06:37.520
<v Speaker 3>be part of that top thirty is really to have

0:06:37.680 --> 0:06:40.560
<v Speaker 3>something going on within one of the criteria that we

0:06:40.640 --> 0:06:44.400
<v Speaker 3>selected or that we assessed. So Europe would certainly feature

0:06:44.480 --> 0:06:47.000
<v Speaker 3>quite strongly because they have a lot of battery manufacturing

0:06:47.040 --> 0:06:50.279
<v Speaker 3>going on. We have North America where Canada, America, Mexico

0:06:50.320 --> 0:06:53.760
<v Speaker 3>features quite strongly. You've got South America where Chile also

0:06:53.800 --> 0:06:56.880
<v Speaker 3>features in addition to other countries. Then you go to Asia,

0:06:57.000 --> 0:06:59.279
<v Speaker 3>you've got the Japan, the China, and then in the

0:06:59.279 --> 0:07:02.840
<v Speaker 3>Pacific region in Australia as well. So certainly a global benchmark.

0:07:02.960 --> 0:07:05.080
<v Speaker 3>But then to be included in that top thirty, I

0:07:05.120 --> 0:07:07.520
<v Speaker 3>think the key criteria is that you need to feature

0:07:07.600 --> 0:07:10.280
<v Speaker 3>quite strongly in the five areas that we assess, at

0:07:10.360 --> 0:07:11.120
<v Speaker 3>least one of them.

0:07:11.320 --> 0:07:14.880
<v Speaker 1>And so since this is the Metals in Mining team,

0:07:15.040 --> 0:07:18.640
<v Speaker 1>can we talk about raw materials and really what's going

0:07:18.680 --> 0:07:20.480
<v Speaker 1>on there and where it comes out on top because

0:07:20.520 --> 0:07:23.560
<v Speaker 1>a lot of our conversations do tend to focus on

0:07:23.640 --> 0:07:26.400
<v Speaker 1>Africa's in area that has a lot of raw materials

0:07:26.400 --> 0:07:29.560
<v Speaker 1>that are necessary for the battery supply chain. How is

0:07:29.640 --> 0:07:32.400
<v Speaker 1>that region faired when we come to the raw material

0:07:32.440 --> 0:07:33.960
<v Speaker 1>space specifically, so.

0:07:34.040 --> 0:07:36.920
<v Speaker 2>Actually, in this ranking, Africa is the only region where

0:07:36.920 --> 0:07:39.400
<v Speaker 2>all the countries that we include in the ranking in

0:07:39.440 --> 0:07:43.480
<v Speaker 2>this case it's Morocco, Democratic Republic of the Congo DRC

0:07:43.880 --> 0:07:47.240
<v Speaker 2>and South Africa. Africa's the only region where all these

0:07:47.240 --> 0:07:50.680
<v Speaker 2>countries have improved in the raw materials category. And we're

0:07:50.680 --> 0:07:53.880
<v Speaker 2>seeing that as there's a renewed interest in energy transition

0:07:53.960 --> 0:07:57.200
<v Speaker 2>and metals for the energy transition. Nations in Africa particularly

0:07:57.280 --> 0:08:01.160
<v Speaker 2>are trying to harness the potential of their critical win reserves,

0:08:01.400 --> 0:08:04.360
<v Speaker 2>as we've seen other supply chains try to decouple from

0:08:04.440 --> 0:08:06.960
<v Speaker 2>China there turning to Africa to see if they can

0:08:07.040 --> 0:08:09.000
<v Speaker 2>use some of their critical minerals there as well.

0:08:09.320 --> 0:08:11.800
<v Speaker 1>So while we're on the topic of battery metals, let's

0:08:11.920 --> 0:08:15.440
<v Speaker 1>talk about prices, because that is certainly something our clients

0:08:15.440 --> 0:08:17.760
<v Speaker 1>on the commodity side are watching closely. And there are

0:08:17.760 --> 0:08:20.200
<v Speaker 1>two medals that have had on one side of fluctuation

0:08:20.280 --> 0:08:22.480
<v Speaker 1>on the other side a dip. So let's talk about

0:08:22.600 --> 0:08:24.920
<v Speaker 1>lithium and nickel, and I know we could spend an

0:08:25.040 --> 0:08:28.280
<v Speaker 1>entire show talking about each independently, So maybe let's start

0:08:28.320 --> 0:08:31.679
<v Speaker 1>with lithium. Why the fluctuations and why did the price

0:08:31.720 --> 0:08:33.839
<v Speaker 1>collapse in twenty twenty three, I.

0:08:33.760 --> 0:08:36.680
<v Speaker 3>Think disclaim every morning day. Now, the first thing I

0:08:36.720 --> 0:08:39.240
<v Speaker 3>do is so look at the lithium prices. So certainly

0:08:39.240 --> 0:08:40.960
<v Speaker 3>you've got me on the right sport. And I think

0:08:41.200 --> 0:08:43.400
<v Speaker 3>the key thing to understand is there are two factors

0:08:43.440 --> 0:08:46.640
<v Speaker 3>that drive supply in the market. Okay, Obviously there's a

0:08:46.679 --> 0:08:50.160
<v Speaker 3>supply and the demand. And for every commodity, if you

0:08:50.240 --> 0:08:54.280
<v Speaker 3>have more supply than demand, you obviously get price dipping. Okay.

0:08:54.320 --> 0:08:57.360
<v Speaker 3>And what happened in the lithium market is a few

0:08:57.400 --> 0:09:01.400
<v Speaker 3>years ago, Batri became the biggest consumer of lithium and

0:09:01.480 --> 0:09:04.240
<v Speaker 3>we saw battery demand grow, which essentially led to an

0:09:04.240 --> 0:09:07.000
<v Speaker 3>increased in demand for lithium as well. Supply was very

0:09:07.040 --> 0:09:09.320
<v Speaker 3>late to the game, so you had a lot of

0:09:09.360 --> 0:09:12.080
<v Speaker 3>demand with very little supply, and we saw prices go

0:09:12.200 --> 0:09:14.600
<v Speaker 3>from ten thousand to about eighty thousand in a matter

0:09:14.640 --> 0:09:17.360
<v Speaker 3>of eighteen months, which is very rare in the commodities market.

0:09:17.480 --> 0:09:20.079
<v Speaker 3>Right to go times eighteen such a short period. Now,

0:09:20.080 --> 0:09:22.400
<v Speaker 3>what happened is that once you have a commodity go

0:09:22.760 --> 0:09:26.000
<v Speaker 3>that high level, two things happen. Everybody now becomes a

0:09:26.040 --> 0:09:29.079
<v Speaker 3>lithium minor, even my good old friends in Australia who

0:09:29.080 --> 0:09:31.800
<v Speaker 3>were exploring for gold decided to go for lithium, and

0:09:31.840 --> 0:09:33.840
<v Speaker 3>now that price point as well. The second thing that

0:09:33.920 --> 0:09:36.960
<v Speaker 3>happens is that it becomes very easy to develop new

0:09:37.000 --> 0:09:40.679
<v Speaker 3>technologies to improve assistant processes. So your efficieness has become better,

0:09:40.720 --> 0:09:43.000
<v Speaker 3>your recoveries become better. So no, I'll think about it.

0:09:43.080 --> 0:09:45.760
<v Speaker 3>My good old friends in Australia, all of them exploring

0:09:45.800 --> 0:09:49.600
<v Speaker 3>for gold overnight and technology becoming better to improve recoveries

0:09:49.640 --> 0:09:53.440
<v Speaker 3>meant that supply really increased significantly within a short period.

0:09:53.679 --> 0:09:55.720
<v Speaker 3>Now let's go back to the laws of economics. Remember

0:09:55.760 --> 0:09:57.600
<v Speaker 3>when I said, when there's a lot more demand, we

0:09:57.640 --> 0:10:00.679
<v Speaker 3>few supply, prices go up. When the revers happen, prices

0:10:00.720 --> 0:10:03.319
<v Speaker 3>go down. So that's precisely what happened last year, where

0:10:03.400 --> 0:10:06.720
<v Speaker 3>the technology improvement in China, where there was a certain

0:10:06.760 --> 0:10:10.240
<v Speaker 3>type of lithium deposit called epidolite, historically had not been

0:10:10.280 --> 0:10:12.800
<v Speaker 3>able to be mined, but then with higher prices they

0:10:12.800 --> 0:10:15.400
<v Speaker 3>were able to crack the technology code. And then suddenly

0:10:15.480 --> 0:10:18.520
<v Speaker 3>China becomes a key producer with all those new projects.

0:10:18.600 --> 0:10:21.200
<v Speaker 3>Even my home country Ghana discovered lithium and they are

0:10:21.240 --> 0:10:23.120
<v Speaker 3>on their way to develop it, So that meant that

0:10:23.200 --> 0:10:26.120
<v Speaker 3>prices came down significantly as a result of a lot

0:10:26.160 --> 0:10:28.599
<v Speaker 3>more supply coming in at a time where demand was

0:10:28.640 --> 0:10:30.920
<v Speaker 3>beginning to slow down. That was the story for lithium.

0:10:30.960 --> 0:10:34.120
<v Speaker 1>But then you note that companies that were mining other

0:10:34.520 --> 0:10:37.400
<v Speaker 1>things like gold have actually pivoted their businesses. So is

0:10:37.440 --> 0:10:40.280
<v Speaker 1>this actually had a knock on effect for other commodities

0:10:40.320 --> 0:10:43.280
<v Speaker 1>and driven prices up as companies have actually switched their

0:10:43.280 --> 0:10:46.000
<v Speaker 1>attention as opposed to adding additional capacity.

0:10:46.360 --> 0:10:49.200
<v Speaker 3>I think very minimal in the sense that most of

0:10:49.240 --> 0:10:53.480
<v Speaker 3>these companies that were exploring have not started producing yet, okay,

0:10:53.520 --> 0:10:56.360
<v Speaker 3>so their supply had not actually entered the market for

0:10:56.440 --> 0:10:59.240
<v Speaker 3>it to distort the market if they pivoted away from it.

0:10:59.280 --> 0:11:01.559
<v Speaker 3>So I think the good for gold producers as well

0:11:01.600 --> 0:11:04.640
<v Speaker 3>as other commodity producers is that those were early stage

0:11:04.679 --> 0:11:08.080
<v Speaker 3>exploration projects that's simply pivoted, so their supply never really

0:11:08.120 --> 0:11:10.840
<v Speaker 3>added onto it. But then what happened with other metals,

0:11:10.880 --> 0:11:13.240
<v Speaker 3>Obviously the impact will be different, but at least within

0:11:13.320 --> 0:11:16.559
<v Speaker 3>the context of gold explorers pivoting to lithium, that was

0:11:16.640 --> 0:11:18.800
<v Speaker 3>very minimal effect on gold and other metals.

0:11:18.880 --> 0:11:21.680
<v Speaker 1>So after you checked lithium prices and had your morning coffee.

0:11:21.760 --> 0:11:24.720
<v Speaker 1>Is it on to nickel? And why has nickel been

0:11:25.200 --> 0:11:28.120
<v Speaker 1>from a pricing standpoint a somewhat similar story. So is

0:11:28.200 --> 0:11:30.520
<v Speaker 1>the reason behind it? Is it the same?

0:11:30.920 --> 0:11:34.640
<v Speaker 3>Quite similar? So also you had nickel ten years ago,

0:11:34.800 --> 0:11:37.840
<v Speaker 3>prices went quite high and then technology played a key role.

0:11:37.920 --> 0:11:40.200
<v Speaker 3>So back to what I said earlier, at higher prices,

0:11:40.440 --> 0:11:43.600
<v Speaker 3>new technologists come online. In this case latrites. There are

0:11:43.600 --> 0:11:46.600
<v Speaker 3>two types of nickel depicits. Obviously, you have what we

0:11:46.640 --> 0:11:50.160
<v Speaker 3>call the sulfite, which historically had been the dominance nickel source.

0:11:50.240 --> 0:11:52.800
<v Speaker 3>So you go to countries like Russia, Australia, Canada, you

0:11:52.840 --> 0:11:55.920
<v Speaker 3>find the sulfit. It's high grade quality, all requires less

0:11:56.000 --> 0:11:59.280
<v Speaker 3>energy to process. And then there had been historically low

0:11:59.360 --> 0:12:01.880
<v Speaker 3>grade deposit is that nobody really touched because they were

0:12:01.920 --> 0:12:05.559
<v Speaker 3>quite expensive to mind. Then the Chinese competition Shan discover

0:12:05.679 --> 0:12:09.120
<v Speaker 3>the technology where they could actually convert those lattert or

0:12:09.160 --> 0:12:12.800
<v Speaker 3>into what we call nickel peg ion using steel. So overnight,

0:12:12.920 --> 0:12:15.800
<v Speaker 3>if you look at the last ten years, Indonesia moved

0:12:15.800 --> 0:12:19.360
<v Speaker 3>from being an insignificant producer of nickel to the largest

0:12:19.360 --> 0:12:22.120
<v Speaker 3>within ten years. They're enough for one reason, improvement in

0:12:22.200 --> 0:12:25.920
<v Speaker 3>technology that made their deposit viable and economic. But here's

0:12:25.960 --> 0:12:28.439
<v Speaker 3>what has happened over the last two years. Indonesia kept

0:12:28.559 --> 0:12:31.520
<v Speaker 3>ramping up their production, kept ramping up their supply, and

0:12:31.559 --> 0:12:34.200
<v Speaker 3>once again they coincided with the period where demand is

0:12:34.200 --> 0:12:36.920
<v Speaker 3>slowing down, so prices began to fall. But the good

0:12:36.960 --> 0:12:39.520
<v Speaker 3>news in Indonesia is that they are producing at a

0:12:39.640 --> 0:12:42.720
<v Speaker 3>very competitive cost, so they don't feel the burniar whereas

0:12:42.840 --> 0:12:46.040
<v Speaker 3>everyone else or most companies around the world are beginning

0:12:46.040 --> 0:12:48.720
<v Speaker 3>to feel the impact. Called prices are actually at a

0:12:48.760 --> 0:12:51.560
<v Speaker 3>point where it's lower than the cost of production. So

0:12:51.600 --> 0:12:54.600
<v Speaker 3>we've seen glen Core BHB and other major producers in

0:12:54.640 --> 0:12:57.920
<v Speaker 3>Australia beginning to put their minds into care and maintenance.

0:12:57.920 --> 0:12:59.720
<v Speaker 3>And when we say care and maintenance, we are not

0:12:59.720 --> 0:13:02.080
<v Speaker 3>going to produce anymore, but we're just going to maintain

0:13:02.120 --> 0:13:05.280
<v Speaker 3>those minds. Simply cost prices are lower than your preating costs.

0:13:05.280 --> 0:13:06.959
<v Speaker 3>But that is not happening in Indonesia.

0:13:07.120 --> 0:13:09.400
<v Speaker 1>Is it common for a government to get involved in

0:13:09.440 --> 0:13:12.120
<v Speaker 1>the supply and demand balance to keep prices or to

0:13:12.160 --> 0:13:14.199
<v Speaker 1>attempt to make prices more stable.

0:13:14.520 --> 0:13:16.280
<v Speaker 3>So you can do that in the oil industry through

0:13:16.280 --> 0:13:18.959
<v Speaker 3>a peck in mind. And if you try to influence. Obviously,

0:13:19.000 --> 0:13:21.520
<v Speaker 3>the EU has the anti trust laws, so two companies

0:13:21.520 --> 0:13:24.320
<v Speaker 3>cannot speak to each other. So I've got my colleague here. Early,

0:13:24.559 --> 0:13:26.839
<v Speaker 3>if Ellie was an independent nickel producer and I was

0:13:26.840 --> 0:13:30.360
<v Speaker 3>an indictdent neickero producer, the EU laws andi trust laws,

0:13:30.559 --> 0:13:34.440
<v Speaker 3>which enforces competition among companies, prevents us to try to

0:13:34.480 --> 0:13:38.120
<v Speaker 3>moderate supply in order to influence prices. So the simple

0:13:38.120 --> 0:13:41.640
<v Speaker 3>answer is no. And because governments don't actually produce these metals,

0:13:41.679 --> 0:13:44.960
<v Speaker 3>they also don't have direct control over how companies are

0:13:45.000 --> 0:13:47.600
<v Speaker 3>preid because then it goes against the rules of competition.

0:13:47.760 --> 0:13:50.040
<v Speaker 3>So that's why it's like, all of a sudden you

0:13:50.080 --> 0:13:53.680
<v Speaker 3>see everyone pumpinging supply. That leads us to a cliff

0:13:53.760 --> 0:13:56.200
<v Speaker 3>edge in mining where overnight we wake up and everybody

0:13:56.240 --> 0:13:58.480
<v Speaker 3>asks what happened simply because all of us we're producer

0:13:58.520 --> 0:13:59.120
<v Speaker 3>at the same time.

0:13:59.360 --> 0:14:02.160
<v Speaker 1>Now, as we're talking about these metals, in light of

0:14:02.240 --> 0:14:04.960
<v Speaker 1>the rankings that we did that focus more on sustainability,

0:14:05.080 --> 0:14:07.400
<v Speaker 1>this brings us to one of my favorite terms, so

0:14:07.520 --> 0:14:10.800
<v Speaker 1>hybrid word the green premium together is the greenium. Is

0:14:10.840 --> 0:14:15.080
<v Speaker 1>there a green premium for essentially those countries at the

0:14:15.080 --> 0:14:17.600
<v Speaker 1>top of this ranking, are they selling their products at

0:14:17.600 --> 0:14:21.120
<v Speaker 1>a higher price because the buyers, well not all of them,

0:14:21.120 --> 0:14:24.200
<v Speaker 1>but some are looking more seriously at sustainability metrics.

0:14:24.680 --> 0:14:27.160
<v Speaker 3>It's always a hard one, right. So the mining industry

0:14:27.280 --> 0:14:29.920
<v Speaker 3>is one of the most unique industries in the world. Okay,

0:14:30.040 --> 0:14:33.760
<v Speaker 3>so mining industry has what we call price takus in

0:14:34.040 --> 0:14:36.760
<v Speaker 3>most other industries. So let's take the phone industry. If

0:14:36.800 --> 0:14:40.240
<v Speaker 3>some song or Apple produces a phone today, they actually

0:14:40.320 --> 0:14:42.480
<v Speaker 3>decide how much they want to sell it. If Timcook

0:14:42.520 --> 0:14:44.520
<v Speaker 3>came out with a new iPhone, he decides that I'm

0:14:44.560 --> 0:14:46.560
<v Speaker 3>going to sell this a thousand, three hundred because my

0:14:46.640 --> 0:14:50.880
<v Speaker 3>cost was whatever plus my margin. In mining, mining companies

0:14:50.920 --> 0:14:53.960
<v Speaker 3>won't have that luxury. They take whatever price and market decide,

0:14:54.200 --> 0:14:56.720
<v Speaker 3>so that premium would have to come from the market.

0:14:56.840 --> 0:14:59.160
<v Speaker 3>And now you need to understand how prices are set.

0:14:59.280 --> 0:15:02.240
<v Speaker 3>So most prices it's either through benchmark or through exchanges.

0:15:02.280 --> 0:15:04.560
<v Speaker 3>If you look at the current structure of the exchanges

0:15:04.600 --> 0:15:07.640
<v Speaker 3>where the prices are discovered, there's very little room for

0:15:07.720 --> 0:15:11.000
<v Speaker 3>them to actually have what we call it the word grimium.

0:15:11.000 --> 0:15:12.640
<v Speaker 3>I'm going to seal that by the way there now,

0:15:12.840 --> 0:15:15.120
<v Speaker 3>there's very little room for them to actually put on

0:15:15.160 --> 0:15:19.200
<v Speaker 3>a premium because there's no structure to incentiviize. Prices are

0:15:19.240 --> 0:15:21.640
<v Speaker 3>set at the macro level, not based on company. Now,

0:15:21.840 --> 0:15:24.200
<v Speaker 3>the assumption is that companies can decide to go into

0:15:24.240 --> 0:15:27.400
<v Speaker 3>bilateral agreements. Okay, so myself and Elie can decide that

0:15:27.720 --> 0:15:29.880
<v Speaker 3>you produce the green to kill for me, I would

0:15:29.880 --> 0:15:32.680
<v Speaker 3>pay it at an extra dollar because I want to

0:15:32.880 --> 0:15:36.320
<v Speaker 3>reach my zero target faster than my competitors. But then

0:15:36.440 --> 0:15:38.240
<v Speaker 3>the key thing is that you need to understand where

0:15:38.240 --> 0:15:41.400
<v Speaker 3>the EV industry is. Every EV company is looking at

0:15:41.440 --> 0:15:45.440
<v Speaker 3>improving its margins to break into profitability by reducing its costs.

0:15:45.520 --> 0:15:48.360
<v Speaker 3>So at the moment, premium is not something any EVA

0:15:48.560 --> 0:15:51.360
<v Speaker 3>company is willing to put on its costs given where

0:15:51.360 --> 0:15:53.800
<v Speaker 3>we want to go with evs to increase the adoption,

0:15:54.040 --> 0:15:55.960
<v Speaker 3>so green permium. Two things I want to end with

0:15:56.080 --> 0:15:58.440
<v Speaker 3>on this question is that one, it will be difficult

0:15:58.560 --> 0:16:01.120
<v Speaker 3>in the current structure of the exchanges where prices are

0:16:01.120 --> 0:16:03.120
<v Speaker 3>discovered for there to be a premium in the market.

0:16:03.240 --> 0:16:06.720
<v Speaker 3>But then secondly, what companies or to companies actually be

0:16:06.760 --> 0:16:08.760
<v Speaker 3>willing to pay for green premiums. That will be hard

0:16:08.800 --> 0:16:10.800
<v Speaker 3>because all of them are trying to reduce costs in

0:16:10.920 --> 0:16:13.640
<v Speaker 3>order to improve the margins. Of the electric vehicle production

0:16:13.800 --> 0:16:15.000
<v Speaker 3>to maximize their profit.

0:16:15.280 --> 0:16:18.560
<v Speaker 1>So perhaps as learning rates improve and electric vehicles become

0:16:18.600 --> 0:16:22.160
<v Speaker 1>more price competitive with internal combustion engine vehicles, which we

0:16:22.200 --> 0:16:24.920
<v Speaker 1>are seeing happen, and we do have forecasts that actually

0:16:24.920 --> 0:16:27.400
<v Speaker 1>think about when that's actually going to be, which is

0:16:27.440 --> 0:16:30.880
<v Speaker 1>not too far away, then it becomes maybe potentially a

0:16:30.880 --> 0:16:33.840
<v Speaker 1>bigger factor in the future, and this ranking maybe it'll

0:16:33.840 --> 0:16:35.600
<v Speaker 1>go precisely.

0:16:35.720 --> 0:16:37.760
<v Speaker 3>But then there's actually a plot twist, right. One thing

0:16:37.800 --> 0:16:40.640
<v Speaker 3>I left out is policy. So look at the impact

0:16:40.680 --> 0:16:43.040
<v Speaker 3>of Seabama as an example. So the Seabama I mean

0:16:43.080 --> 0:16:46.560
<v Speaker 3>the carbon boder adjustment mechanism the European Union introduce, And

0:16:46.640 --> 0:16:48.800
<v Speaker 3>what that means is that if you're a seal or

0:16:48.840 --> 0:16:51.600
<v Speaker 3>aluminum important in the EU and you decide to import

0:16:51.680 --> 0:16:54.960
<v Speaker 3>from a country whose emissions standards is not equivalent to

0:16:55.000 --> 0:16:57.000
<v Speaker 3>what you have in the EU, you pay a premium

0:16:57.000 --> 0:16:59.160
<v Speaker 3>on top of that, right or you pay a charge

0:16:59.160 --> 0:17:02.360
<v Speaker 3>based on where the prices. So similarly, the EU is

0:17:02.360 --> 0:17:04.639
<v Speaker 3>trying to introduce the battery passport. So what's going to

0:17:04.680 --> 0:17:07.000
<v Speaker 3>happen is that the EU is hoping to track the

0:17:07.040 --> 0:17:10.280
<v Speaker 3>emissions profile of auto companies in the EU. So if

0:17:10.320 --> 0:17:13.680
<v Speaker 3>you don't want to pay that penalty, which is aligned

0:17:13.680 --> 0:17:16.600
<v Speaker 3>with the carbon price. Then the good thing is that

0:17:16.720 --> 0:17:19.320
<v Speaker 3>you go to the producers that produce the good stuff.

0:17:19.320 --> 0:17:21.600
<v Speaker 3>And because everybody will be going to the producers that

0:17:21.640 --> 0:17:24.320
<v Speaker 3>produce a lower emission nickel, that is where we think

0:17:24.560 --> 0:17:28.679
<v Speaker 3>that obviously there might be a potential premium attach touced

0:17:28.680 --> 0:17:32.240
<v Speaker 3>producers doing it in low emissions profile. So yes, character

0:17:32.240 --> 0:17:34.760
<v Speaker 3>and stick. I think that one's a big stick, particularly

0:17:34.760 --> 0:17:38.040
<v Speaker 3>from the EU is enforced. There's a probability that companies

0:17:38.080 --> 0:17:40.440
<v Speaker 3>would have no option than to offer premiums in order

0:17:40.480 --> 0:17:42.080
<v Speaker 3>to get access to the low emission stuff.

0:17:42.440 --> 0:17:45.320
<v Speaker 1>So now we've entered our let's predict the future part

0:17:45.320 --> 0:17:47.840
<v Speaker 1>of the podcast, which always seems to come at some

0:17:47.960 --> 0:17:51.119
<v Speaker 1>point in the show when it comes to these different

0:17:51.160 --> 0:17:54.880
<v Speaker 1>well nickel and lithium specifically, do we expect twenty twenty

0:17:54.880 --> 0:17:58.400
<v Speaker 1>four to be a more stable year depends.

0:17:58.040 --> 0:18:00.359
<v Speaker 3>On what world leaders have for coughing the more. But

0:18:00.400 --> 0:18:02.680
<v Speaker 3>then what I tend to realize the near term price

0:18:02.760 --> 0:18:06.160
<v Speaker 3>movement is mostly based on geopolitics, which is number one.

0:18:06.320 --> 0:18:09.480
<v Speaker 3>A classic example is Russia is a major producer of nickel,

0:18:09.560 --> 0:18:12.000
<v Speaker 3>so nichol is actually the only metal that has class

0:18:12.119 --> 0:18:14.200
<v Speaker 3>class in the sense that there are two types of nickel,

0:18:14.200 --> 0:18:16.560
<v Speaker 3>the Class one, which is a high priority stuff used

0:18:16.560 --> 0:18:19.600
<v Speaker 3>in battery manufacturing, and then the Class two, which is

0:18:19.680 --> 0:18:22.879
<v Speaker 3>used for seal steel production. So Russia is a key

0:18:22.920 --> 0:18:25.720
<v Speaker 3>produce of Class one, and if America or any other

0:18:25.720 --> 0:18:29.840
<v Speaker 3>country for that matter, decides to impose assanction on Russia's nickel,

0:18:29.960 --> 0:18:33.080
<v Speaker 3>that certainly would move the market and unfortunately not make

0:18:33.080 --> 0:18:34.879
<v Speaker 3>it a stable yet. So I think that's one. But

0:18:34.920 --> 0:18:38.840
<v Speaker 3>then burying all these assumptions and geopolitical impact, we do

0:18:38.960 --> 0:18:41.240
<v Speaker 3>think that we expect recovery in the market because we

0:18:41.280 --> 0:18:45.000
<v Speaker 3>are seeing that companies are increasingly beginning to shut down supply.

0:18:45.160 --> 0:18:46.879
<v Speaker 3>And then, if we go back to the economics one

0:18:46.920 --> 0:18:50.679
<v Speaker 3>O one that I mentioned, when supply finally is lower

0:18:50.680 --> 0:18:53.600
<v Speaker 3>than demand, or let me say, when demand finally exceeds supply,

0:18:53.840 --> 0:18:56.040
<v Speaker 3>what you see is that prices begin to recover. So

0:18:56.119 --> 0:18:59.879
<v Speaker 3>as more companies furlow or put their operations into care men,

0:19:00.320 --> 0:19:03.439
<v Speaker 3>if it tips to skill to the point where supply

0:19:03.560 --> 0:19:06.080
<v Speaker 3>becomes less than demand, we think that prices will recover.

0:19:06.280 --> 0:19:08.520
<v Speaker 3>But overall our view is that that recovery would not

0:19:08.600 --> 0:19:11.240
<v Speaker 3>be significant compared to the drop we saw last year.

0:19:11.480 --> 0:19:13.879
<v Speaker 1>So we've spent a lot of time talking about countries,

0:19:14.040 --> 0:19:17.959
<v Speaker 1>and invariably this is a really important policy discussion. As

0:19:18.000 --> 0:19:20.439
<v Speaker 1>you've pointed out, Quazy, Let's talk a second about the

0:19:20.560 --> 0:19:23.720
<v Speaker 1>companies involved here. What are some of the bigger companies

0:19:23.800 --> 0:19:27.359
<v Speaker 1>and is that actively shifting. Are there new entrants in

0:19:27.400 --> 0:19:29.560
<v Speaker 1>this market or is it really the same companies that

0:19:29.600 --> 0:19:31.000
<v Speaker 1>have always been in the space.

0:19:31.320 --> 0:19:35.360
<v Speaker 2>As Quzy mentioned earlier, we're seeing companies expand into different

0:19:35.400 --> 0:19:39.720
<v Speaker 2>metals and into new portfolios. But in the terms of lithium,

0:19:39.720 --> 0:19:43.440
<v Speaker 2>for example, we've seen that there's top five producers standing

0:19:43.520 --> 0:19:47.400
<v Speaker 2>firm in their position, for example Alba Marley, SQM, gan

0:19:47.480 --> 0:19:51.520
<v Speaker 2>Feng in China. But as people are recognizing the potential

0:19:51.520 --> 0:19:54.800
<v Speaker 2>and opportunity that comes with these energy transition metals, companies

0:19:54.800 --> 0:19:57.840
<v Speaker 2>from sectors aren't necessarily in the metal space are getting involved.

0:19:57.920 --> 0:20:00.159
<v Speaker 2>And a perfect example of that is in the in

0:20:00.200 --> 0:20:04.320
<v Speaker 2>gas space, where we're seeing Exon Mobile planning to produce

0:20:04.359 --> 0:20:07.399
<v Speaker 2>lithium by twenty twenty seven and people probably thinking like

0:20:07.440 --> 0:20:11.120
<v Speaker 2>why is this happening? How does this actually work in practice?

0:20:11.240 --> 0:20:14.280
<v Speaker 2>But interestingly, there's actually a lot of synergy between the

0:20:14.280 --> 0:20:17.800
<v Speaker 2>production of oil from oil fields and the production of

0:20:18.280 --> 0:20:21.439
<v Speaker 2>lithium from Brian, so a lot of the expertise and

0:20:21.520 --> 0:20:24.320
<v Speaker 2>equipment that is already existingly used in oil and gas

0:20:24.359 --> 0:20:27.200
<v Speaker 2>can also transfer over to lithium, which is great as

0:20:27.200 --> 0:20:30.399
<v Speaker 2>we're seeing these companies trying to take advantage of what

0:20:30.440 --> 0:20:31.679
<v Speaker 2>they have already in place.

0:20:32.200 --> 0:20:34.399
<v Speaker 3>Even in the lithium space as well, we've seen battery

0:20:34.400 --> 0:20:37.960
<v Speaker 3>manufacturers actually also go all the way upstream. So c

0:20:38.119 --> 0:20:41.920
<v Speaker 3>ATL has concessions where they're actually mining lithium mum as

0:20:41.960 --> 0:20:45.560
<v Speaker 3>we speak now, they've taken equity in our Congolese coboar

0:20:45.640 --> 0:20:46.000
<v Speaker 3>to mine.

0:20:46.080 --> 0:20:46.280
<v Speaker 1>Given.

0:20:46.359 --> 0:20:49.520
<v Speaker 3>One example that would actually surprise you, danais GM General

0:20:49.600 --> 0:20:53.080
<v Speaker 3>Motor Zeroto Company has actually gone into take equity in

0:20:53.119 --> 0:20:55.199
<v Speaker 3>a mining company. And look, I'm not all but then

0:20:55.240 --> 0:20:57.520
<v Speaker 3>I know that the last time an auto company took

0:20:57.560 --> 0:20:59.960
<v Speaker 3>equity in a mining company was the days of Henry Ford.

0:21:00.160 --> 0:21:04.760
<v Speaker 3>So simple terms, yes, companies that are actually making entrant

0:21:04.800 --> 0:21:08.480
<v Speaker 3>and dominating the supply chain is actually evolving similar to

0:21:08.480 --> 0:21:10.040
<v Speaker 3>what we are seeing in steel, and there a whole

0:21:10.080 --> 0:21:12.600
<v Speaker 3>lot of reasons we can talk about. One other reason

0:21:12.640 --> 0:21:15.720
<v Speaker 3>why we are seeing that shifting companies coming from different

0:21:15.760 --> 0:21:18.560
<v Speaker 3>places into the mining industry is the fact that people

0:21:18.560 --> 0:21:21.119
<v Speaker 3>have realized that there's a probability that there would not

0:21:21.119 --> 0:21:24.399
<v Speaker 3>be enough for all of them. That's one second. People

0:21:24.400 --> 0:21:27.560
<v Speaker 3>have realized that there's a probability that the good stuff

0:21:27.600 --> 0:21:30.600
<v Speaker 3>from a sustainable or ESG perspective might not be enough

0:21:30.640 --> 0:21:34.920
<v Speaker 3>for all of them. So, rather than adopt the historical

0:21:35.119 --> 0:21:38.159
<v Speaker 3>supply chain strategy of just in time, and by just

0:21:38.200 --> 0:21:40.840
<v Speaker 3>in time, auto companies historically don't want to commit to

0:21:40.920 --> 0:21:43.080
<v Speaker 3>more than teddy days or sixty days of inventory is

0:21:43.080 --> 0:21:44.919
<v Speaker 3>we're just going to wait to factor gator and deliver.

0:21:45.040 --> 0:21:47.280
<v Speaker 3>They realize that, look, if we don't go out there

0:21:47.600 --> 0:21:50.840
<v Speaker 3>and help these miners or even become minus like Tesla

0:21:50.960 --> 0:21:53.200
<v Speaker 3>Annow's a few years ago, there might not be enough

0:21:53.240 --> 0:21:55.919
<v Speaker 3>for us. So you're absolutely right. The companies in the

0:21:55.960 --> 0:21:58.879
<v Speaker 3>mix that are dominating the industry are gradually shifting, and

0:21:58.920 --> 0:22:01.720
<v Speaker 3>I'm quite interested in what that list would look like

0:22:01.800 --> 0:22:02.760
<v Speaker 3>by twenty thirty.

0:22:02.840 --> 0:22:04.600
<v Speaker 2>Who knows now, And I was going to say, we've

0:22:04.640 --> 0:22:06.960
<v Speaker 2>seen this early move approach be so successful on a

0:22:07.000 --> 0:22:09.320
<v Speaker 2>country level. That's the reason why China dominates a supply

0:22:09.440 --> 0:22:11.679
<v Speaker 2>chain today. So what these companies are trying to do

0:22:11.720 --> 0:22:14.159
<v Speaker 2>is replicate that on a more granular level. To ensure

0:22:14.160 --> 0:22:16.199
<v Speaker 2>that they can be the leaders in the market that

0:22:16.240 --> 0:22:16.760
<v Speaker 2>they want to be.

0:22:17.040 --> 0:22:19.359
<v Speaker 1>So we've got a diverse set of companies and a

0:22:19.400 --> 0:22:22.119
<v Speaker 1>diverse set of countries in this ranking. How do we

0:22:22.160 --> 0:22:25.480
<v Speaker 1>compare apples to apples, Because this seems like it's a

0:22:25.600 --> 0:22:28.159
<v Speaker 1>pretty diverse set of things that we're going to have

0:22:28.240 --> 0:22:29.800
<v Speaker 1>to look at. I mean, how do you do this

0:22:29.840 --> 0:22:31.160
<v Speaker 1>from a methodology standpoint?

0:22:31.480 --> 0:22:33.399
<v Speaker 3>So i'dan, I don't know if you want us to

0:22:33.520 --> 0:22:36.720
<v Speaker 3>release the BNF secrete sauce of comparing level, but look,

0:22:36.760 --> 0:22:38.639
<v Speaker 3>I think it's that's a hard part of what we

0:22:38.680 --> 0:22:41.919
<v Speaker 3>do with these rankings because obviously you've got other micro

0:22:42.080 --> 0:22:46.159
<v Speaker 3>level of companies. Even within companies, different minds or different

0:22:46.200 --> 0:22:49.719
<v Speaker 3>projects have different metrics, right, So I think it's important

0:22:49.760 --> 0:22:53.119
<v Speaker 3>for us to first of all set that benchmark, so

0:22:53.160 --> 0:22:56.080
<v Speaker 3>we go into details. If you take an example, their missions.

0:22:56.119 --> 0:22:59.440
<v Speaker 3>So fortunately BEINGF has this really good climate scope is

0:22:59.480 --> 0:23:02.879
<v Speaker 3>an example. All Climoscope is one of our big research

0:23:03.160 --> 0:23:05.200
<v Speaker 3>pieces we put out every year where we sort of

0:23:05.320 --> 0:23:07.600
<v Speaker 3>rank countries and the progress they are making in the

0:23:07.680 --> 0:23:11.120
<v Speaker 3>renewable energy space, whether policy or capacity build. So for us,

0:23:11.160 --> 0:23:14.240
<v Speaker 3>these are in house methodologies that we've built that have

0:23:14.680 --> 0:23:18.879
<v Speaker 3>to standardize what countries are doing within the renewable energy space,

0:23:19.080 --> 0:23:21.400
<v Speaker 3>which sort of makes our life easy because we don't

0:23:21.400 --> 0:23:23.639
<v Speaker 3>have to reinvent the wheelders. So that's an example the

0:23:23.680 --> 0:23:26.439
<v Speaker 3>fact that we have in house benchmarks we've developed that

0:23:26.600 --> 0:23:29.639
<v Speaker 3>helps us to compare these countries in other areas as well.

0:23:30.000 --> 0:23:33.920
<v Speaker 3>It's also important that for us having that benchmark that

0:23:34.040 --> 0:23:36.760
<v Speaker 3>all other countries input aligns with.

0:23:37.240 --> 0:23:40.000
<v Speaker 1>Is it a pretty tight race between those thirty countries

0:23:40.040 --> 0:23:43.160
<v Speaker 1>that we were evaluating or is there a big gap

0:23:43.200 --> 0:23:45.119
<v Speaker 1>between Canada and everybody else.

0:23:45.520 --> 0:23:47.800
<v Speaker 2>There's a big gap. And what we've seen as the

0:23:47.880 --> 0:23:50.440
<v Speaker 2>rankings have gone on is countries are starting to form

0:23:50.520 --> 0:23:54.040
<v Speaker 2>into clusters. So we've seen at the top the countries

0:23:54.040 --> 0:23:57.520
<v Speaker 2>that have the clear policy commitments, have the ambitions in place,

0:23:57.560 --> 0:24:00.560
<v Speaker 2>and are actually getting to the implementation stage. We've seen

0:24:00.560 --> 0:24:03.520
<v Speaker 2>at the bottom of the countries such as Bolivia, DRC

0:24:04.119 --> 0:24:08.560
<v Speaker 2>and Argentina that have raw materials to a certain extent,

0:24:08.680 --> 0:24:12.120
<v Speaker 2>but aren't necessarily capitalizing it across the whole supply chain,

0:24:12.160 --> 0:24:14.720
<v Speaker 2>so they're just sitting within their strength and not developing

0:24:14.760 --> 0:24:16.639
<v Speaker 2>as much as they could. And then we have the

0:24:16.680 --> 0:24:19.400
<v Speaker 2>middle round, which involves a lot of the Southeast Asian

0:24:19.440 --> 0:24:22.920
<v Speaker 2>countries actually, such as Indonesia and India, that are trying

0:24:22.960 --> 0:24:25.879
<v Speaker 2>to make the next step to success. So we've seen

0:24:25.960 --> 0:24:29.160
<v Speaker 2>Indonesia build their nickel market, but now it's how can

0:24:29.200 --> 0:24:32.960
<v Speaker 2>they use that nickel market to try and attract manufacturing investment,

0:24:33.080 --> 0:24:35.080
<v Speaker 2>And that's at the stage r at the moment, trying

0:24:35.080 --> 0:24:38.000
<v Speaker 2>to get to the next step in building the supply chain.

0:24:38.320 --> 0:24:41.200
<v Speaker 3>Adding what too Early said, this is a unique ranking

0:24:41.280 --> 0:24:43.560
<v Speaker 3>where it'll only get lonely at the top four one year.

0:24:43.640 --> 0:24:47.600
<v Speaker 3>Because us early mentioned the competition really horisen. Never in

0:24:47.600 --> 0:24:49.960
<v Speaker 3>my wild as imagination when we started as four years

0:24:49.960 --> 0:24:52.960
<v Speaker 3>ago did I think that Canada would become first down

0:24:53.000 --> 0:24:55.680
<v Speaker 3>the line, right, So the competition is quite high. If

0:24:55.720 --> 0:24:58.520
<v Speaker 3>you look at the earlier IT creations of the ARM

0:24:58.560 --> 0:25:01.639
<v Speaker 3>rankings that we did back I remember vividly when we

0:25:01.720 --> 0:25:04.240
<v Speaker 3>did the first one, the difference between China and the

0:25:04.280 --> 0:25:07.840
<v Speaker 3>second country was very significant. And then last year you had,

0:25:07.920 --> 0:25:10.879
<v Speaker 3>for example, the Inflation Redaction Act and you can see

0:25:10.960 --> 0:25:14.240
<v Speaker 3>that instantly it puts America in the game as well.

0:25:14.280 --> 0:25:16.320
<v Speaker 3>And then the EU came with this Green Deal and

0:25:16.359 --> 0:25:19.640
<v Speaker 3>it also helped propel countries like Germany, Okay, and then

0:25:19.720 --> 0:25:22.720
<v Speaker 3>you look at a country like Elie mentioned Indonesia, where

0:25:22.800 --> 0:25:26.320
<v Speaker 3>a few years ago in nickel class one refinery, China

0:25:26.440 --> 0:25:29.000
<v Speaker 3>was number one. This year, according to being a forecast,

0:25:29.080 --> 0:25:32.760
<v Speaker 3>Indonesia is likely to overtake China in the refinery of

0:25:33.000 --> 0:25:38.080
<v Speaker 3>nickel soffet used in batteries. So it's important to realize that.

0:25:38.119 --> 0:25:40.240
<v Speaker 3>I think the key thing is that, yes, you can

0:25:40.280 --> 0:25:43.120
<v Speaker 3>win today, but then it's very very difficult. With the

0:25:43.160 --> 0:25:46.080
<v Speaker 3>pace of growth we've seen in countries like Germany, in

0:25:46.119 --> 0:25:49.400
<v Speaker 3>countries like the United States, and then in countries like Canada,

0:25:49.600 --> 0:25:53.119
<v Speaker 3>it becomes unpredictable who's going to be first in subsequent

0:25:53.320 --> 0:25:54.280
<v Speaker 3>editions of the ranking.

0:25:54.680 --> 0:25:56.919
<v Speaker 1>So, Elie, you'd mentioned those in the middle of the

0:25:57.000 --> 0:26:01.679
<v Speaker 1>ranking are potentially striving to raise higher. Maybe they're not

0:26:01.720 --> 0:26:04.520
<v Speaker 1>looking at this ranking specifically is their aim, but they're

0:26:04.520 --> 0:26:07.720
<v Speaker 1>certainly looking at their sustainability credentials. And what I want

0:26:07.800 --> 0:26:09.520
<v Speaker 1>to know is what's going to take to actually rise

0:26:09.520 --> 0:26:11.879
<v Speaker 1>in that ranking, and which countries are thinking about it

0:26:11.920 --> 0:26:14.320
<v Speaker 1>and how are they going about it or maybe even

0:26:14.359 --> 0:26:18.200
<v Speaker 1>a playbook. I mean, basically, how are countries approaching improving

0:26:18.359 --> 0:26:19.080
<v Speaker 1>in this ranking.

0:26:19.400 --> 0:26:21.960
<v Speaker 2>So what we've seen successful for lots of regions is

0:26:22.160 --> 0:26:25.240
<v Speaker 2>they've capitalized on their strength to help build out other

0:26:25.280 --> 0:26:28.040
<v Speaker 2>parts of the supply chain, and we're seeing that approach

0:26:28.080 --> 0:26:30.560
<v Speaker 2>being used again and again by regions that are striving

0:26:30.600 --> 0:26:32.840
<v Speaker 2>to improve. So if you take Africa, that's a really

0:26:32.880 --> 0:26:35.120
<v Speaker 2>good example because as you mentioned earlier, they're the only

0:26:35.160 --> 0:26:38.320
<v Speaker 2>region that is improved across the raw materials sector, but

0:26:38.440 --> 0:26:41.600
<v Speaker 2>actually in the overall ranking they still sit pretty low.

0:26:41.800 --> 0:26:45.600
<v Speaker 2>And we as BNF had opportunity to visit South Africa

0:26:45.760 --> 0:26:47.760
<v Speaker 2>for the BNF Forum in Cape Town and we had

0:26:47.760 --> 0:26:51.359
<v Speaker 2>a discussion about how we could harness the critical murial's

0:26:51.400 --> 0:26:54.880
<v Speaker 2>potential in Africa to ensure this foundation for growth can

0:26:54.920 --> 0:26:57.399
<v Speaker 2>be made. And what we found is that in Africa,

0:26:57.480 --> 0:27:00.320
<v Speaker 2>for example, they are established in the mining sector. South

0:27:00.359 --> 0:27:03.639
<v Speaker 2>Africa's the top producer of minds manganese DRC takes the

0:27:03.720 --> 0:27:06.000
<v Speaker 2>larger share of the mind's cobalt supply in the world,

0:27:06.119 --> 0:27:08.760
<v Speaker 2>but it stops at mind supply. And what Africa trying

0:27:08.800 --> 0:27:10.639
<v Speaker 2>to do and need to do is actually harness the

0:27:10.720 --> 0:27:14.359
<v Speaker 2>critical minerals potential to be able to move further downstream

0:27:14.440 --> 0:27:17.560
<v Speaker 2>in the raw materials value chain, so actually take part

0:27:17.640 --> 0:27:21.280
<v Speaker 2>in the value adding activity which can bring more development

0:27:21.359 --> 0:27:24.840
<v Speaker 2>and economic benefit to the region so they can build

0:27:24.960 --> 0:27:27.600
<v Speaker 2>further down the supply chain. There are of course challenges

0:27:27.640 --> 0:27:29.680
<v Speaker 2>to that, and what the report hired is that there's

0:27:29.760 --> 0:27:31.879
<v Speaker 2>been progressed, but actually there's a real long way to

0:27:31.920 --> 0:27:35.280
<v Speaker 2>go for Africa still and focusing on specific areas is

0:27:35.320 --> 0:27:38.280
<v Speaker 2>important to ensure that Africa can become a supply chain

0:27:38.280 --> 0:27:38.840
<v Speaker 2>for the future.

0:27:39.119 --> 0:27:40.840
<v Speaker 3>I think Dana can I can talk about some of

0:27:40.840 --> 0:27:44.119
<v Speaker 3>these specific points that we highlighted the and the report

0:27:44.200 --> 0:27:47.320
<v Speaker 3>in how Africa can improve its critical mineral's potential, And

0:27:47.440 --> 0:27:50.560
<v Speaker 3>one was obviously sustainability and as you know, are being

0:27:50.600 --> 0:27:52.520
<v Speaker 3>there for something that is important to us. But it's

0:27:52.560 --> 0:27:55.119
<v Speaker 3>not just we have benf Also the wider industry is

0:27:55.160 --> 0:27:57.879
<v Speaker 3>beginning to look into how can mines be more sustainable though,

0:27:57.960 --> 0:28:00.000
<v Speaker 3>so one way where if you look at South Africa's

0:28:00.000 --> 0:28:02.160
<v Speaker 3>South Africa has one of the highest CEO or two

0:28:02.240 --> 0:28:04.800
<v Speaker 3>emissions on its grid, so that doesn't help really well

0:28:04.840 --> 0:28:07.800
<v Speaker 3>if Africa wants to be the raw material producer of

0:28:07.880 --> 0:28:10.800
<v Speaker 3>the future. Another area is also good governance. So there

0:28:10.800 --> 0:28:13.000
<v Speaker 3>were instances where if you look at the country like

0:28:13.040 --> 0:28:15.640
<v Speaker 3>the Democratic Republic of Congo a few years ago, I'm

0:28:15.680 --> 0:28:18.479
<v Speaker 3>net International that a report and talked about how there

0:28:18.480 --> 0:28:21.560
<v Speaker 3>were incidents of corruption and also human rights abuses in

0:28:21.600 --> 0:28:24.679
<v Speaker 3>the minding value chain, particularly at the atis now illegal

0:28:24.760 --> 0:28:27.560
<v Speaker 3>atismal small skill level. So that's also one thing where

0:28:27.600 --> 0:28:30.359
<v Speaker 3>the reporter highlighted that good governance will certainly go a

0:28:30.359 --> 0:28:34.000
<v Speaker 3>long way into making Africa the important region to produce

0:28:34.000 --> 0:28:36.760
<v Speaker 3>a raw materials we need for the transition. Financing was

0:28:36.800 --> 0:28:39.640
<v Speaker 3>also part of it, right because most companies for most

0:28:39.640 --> 0:28:43.280
<v Speaker 3>countries are not able to transform the amnial resources into

0:28:43.400 --> 0:28:46.080
<v Speaker 3>value art products which would improve the ascores on the

0:28:46.160 --> 0:28:49.440
<v Speaker 3>ranking simply because they are not getting access to financing,

0:28:49.560 --> 0:28:52.080
<v Speaker 3>and we ded touch on the important factors that is

0:28:52.120 --> 0:28:55.360
<v Speaker 3>needed to ensure that these projects get the much needed financing.

0:28:55.520 --> 0:28:58.320
<v Speaker 3>Another important thing is the one thing that most people

0:28:58.400 --> 0:29:00.320
<v Speaker 3>don't know is I started my care We are in

0:29:00.360 --> 0:29:03.640
<v Speaker 3>a university, so skill set mutchs a lot to me.

0:29:03.840 --> 0:29:07.000
<v Speaker 3>And it's important that one of the challenges we put

0:29:07.080 --> 0:29:09.480
<v Speaker 3>to the people around the round table was the fact

0:29:09.480 --> 0:29:12.560
<v Speaker 3>that how many universities are actually offering a cross in

0:29:12.640 --> 0:29:16.040
<v Speaker 3>battery management or battery engineering or call it whatever, right,

0:29:16.120 --> 0:29:19.840
<v Speaker 3>So it's important that countries regions can be passionate about

0:29:19.880 --> 0:29:24.520
<v Speaker 3>the transition, but without preparing the workforce of the future today,

0:29:24.680 --> 0:29:28.640
<v Speaker 3>it becomes practically impossible to play any key role in there,

0:29:28.720 --> 0:29:30.560
<v Speaker 3>and a host of other factors as well. And I

0:29:30.600 --> 0:29:35.040
<v Speaker 3>believe once African countries, particularly in this ranking, are able

0:29:35.040 --> 0:29:37.880
<v Speaker 3>to address these, are pretty sure that the rankings under

0:29:37.960 --> 0:29:39.920
<v Speaker 3>line might look different from what it is today.

0:29:40.400 --> 0:29:43.040
<v Speaker 1>Well, Quezy Ellie, thank you so much for coming on

0:29:43.080 --> 0:29:45.240
<v Speaker 1>the show today, sharing the rankings and just some of

0:29:45.240 --> 0:29:47.680
<v Speaker 1>the really interesting things that are happening in metals and

0:29:47.720 --> 0:29:48.440
<v Speaker 1>mining at the moment.

0:29:48.800 --> 0:29:49.720
<v Speaker 3>Thank you for having us.

0:29:49.920 --> 0:29:50.600
<v Speaker 2>Thanks Daniel.

0:29:59.560 --> 0:30:02.920
<v Speaker 1>Switched is produced by Cam Gray with production assistance from

0:30:03.000 --> 0:30:06.840
<v Speaker 1>Kamala Shelling and Ulushi Kirunarete. Bloomberg NEIF is a service

0:30:06.880 --> 0:30:10.160
<v Speaker 1>provided by Bloomberg Finance LP and its affiliates. This recording

0:30:10.160 --> 0:30:12.920
<v Speaker 1>does not constitute, nor should it be construed as investment

0:30:12.920 --> 0:30:16.400
<v Speaker 1>in vice, investment recommendations, or a recommendation as to an

0:30:16.400 --> 0:30:19.600
<v Speaker 1>investment or other strategy. Bloomberg NIF should not be considered

0:30:19.640 --> 0:30:22.920
<v Speaker 1>as information sufficient upon which to base an investment decision.

0:30:23.040 --> 0:30:26.000
<v Speaker 1>Neither Bloomberg Finance LP nor any of its affiliates makes

0:30:26.040 --> 0:30:29.760
<v Speaker 1>any representation or warranty as to the accuracy or completeness

0:30:29.800 --> 0:30:32.800
<v Speaker 1>of the information contained in this recording, and any liability

0:30:32.840 --> 0:30:35.520
<v Speaker 1>as a result of this recording is expressly disclaimed.