WEBVTT - Cowboys Break: First Grade?

0:00:04.960 --> 0:00:07.480
<v Speaker 1>The following Here's a production of Dallas Cowboys dot Com

0:00:07.480 --> 0:00:17.840
<v Speaker 1>and the Dallas Cowboys Football Club. Cowboys, Let's go. Are

0:00:17.840 --> 0:00:20.720
<v Speaker 1>you ready for a break? Yes? Are you ready for

0:00:20.760 --> 0:00:25.840
<v Speaker 1>a break? Absolutely? Ready for a break? Yeah? And so

0:00:25.960 --> 0:00:29.720
<v Speaker 1>much for that. It's time for the Break on Dallas

0:00:29.760 --> 0:00:35.440
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys dot Com. Were with Nick Eatman, David Hellman, and

0:00:35.680 --> 0:00:41.880
<v Speaker 1>bar Garcia and Derek Eagleton. It is Wednesday, April sixth,

0:00:41.920 --> 0:00:45.199
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty two, Season eighteen, episode number three. Welcome to

0:00:45.200 --> 0:00:47.159
<v Speaker 1>the latest edition of The Break Life and Nest WBC

0:00:47.280 --> 0:00:50.680
<v Speaker 1>Mortgage Studios. At the started day, we're talking draft. We're

0:00:50.680 --> 0:00:52.760
<v Speaker 1>gonna get you guys ready these next few shows, get

0:00:52.800 --> 0:00:55.680
<v Speaker 1>you ready for draft. It's happening later this month into

0:00:55.680 --> 0:00:58.280
<v Speaker 1>the month actually, and I know Dave's been doing a

0:00:58.320 --> 0:01:01.600
<v Speaker 1>lot of work on that in his his appearances on

0:01:01.640 --> 0:01:03.800
<v Speaker 1>the Draft Show. Nick, I'm sure he is writing lots

0:01:03.800 --> 0:01:05.920
<v Speaker 1>of great articles and Hamberg's getting a lot of stuff

0:01:05.920 --> 0:01:08.399
<v Speaker 1>ready for somost. So we got a lot of information

0:01:08.440 --> 0:01:10.520
<v Speaker 1>that we were gonna digest that we're gonna give you,

0:01:10.560 --> 0:01:12.440
<v Speaker 1>guys for you to digest over the next few weeks

0:01:12.680 --> 0:01:15.959
<v Speaker 1>getting ready for the Cowboys Draft. Here in late April,

0:01:16.040 --> 0:01:21.000
<v Speaker 1>how's everybody doing today? Great? Good? Wow, that was loud. Sorry, Yeah,

0:01:21.200 --> 0:01:24.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm a little confused about something. So I'm glad we're

0:01:24.480 --> 0:01:26.759
<v Speaker 1>talking draft because I do have a question. You want

0:01:26.760 --> 0:01:28.160
<v Speaker 1>to throw it out there, Let's let's get it out

0:01:28.200 --> 0:01:30.920
<v Speaker 1>there in the open, right. Typically when you have a question,

0:01:30.959 --> 0:01:33.120
<v Speaker 1>it takes up like twenty five minutes of the show.

0:01:33.480 --> 0:01:36.520
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, let's get into it. I mean, it's just

0:01:36.600 --> 0:01:38.800
<v Speaker 1>about it. And one of the names that has been

0:01:39.240 --> 0:01:41.560
<v Speaker 1>one of the most popular names when it comes to

0:01:41.600 --> 0:01:44.400
<v Speaker 1>the Cowboys in their first pack at twenty four is

0:01:44.440 --> 0:01:51.320
<v Speaker 1>a center, Tyler under Bomb. But uh yeah, I guess

0:01:51.720 --> 0:01:54.800
<v Speaker 1>I haven't really studied much about him or learned much

0:01:54.920 --> 0:01:58.720
<v Speaker 1>about like can he play other positions? You know, why

0:01:58.840 --> 0:02:01.200
<v Speaker 1>is that name? Why is this center? And I know, Nick,

0:02:02.080 --> 0:02:06.200
<v Speaker 1>it's kind of gearing tours the change of or let's say,

0:02:06.200 --> 0:02:09.239
<v Speaker 1>an upgrade at center, but just in general, like me personally,

0:02:09.560 --> 0:02:12.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't see that as the biggest necessity on the

0:02:13.000 --> 0:02:16.840
<v Speaker 1>oh line. But why is the name like that a

0:02:17.000 --> 0:02:22.000
<v Speaker 1>center being so popular for the Cowboys right now? Because

0:02:22.360 --> 0:02:25.840
<v Speaker 1>centers not a position that's typically valued heavily in the draft.

0:02:26.919 --> 0:02:29.640
<v Speaker 1>You know, Travis Frederick was drafted thirty first overall, and

0:02:29.639 --> 0:02:31.680
<v Speaker 1>people thought it was a bad pick. People tend to

0:02:31.720 --> 0:02:33.880
<v Speaker 1>think you can find a good center later in the draft.

0:02:34.240 --> 0:02:37.959
<v Speaker 1>So when a center comes along that has really good pedigree,

0:02:38.040 --> 0:02:40.880
<v Speaker 1>like a surefire first round pick, that's kind of rare.

0:02:41.320 --> 0:02:44.640
<v Speaker 1>Tyler Linderbaum dominated at Iowa. You won the Remington Trophy,

0:02:45.000 --> 0:02:46.600
<v Speaker 1>which is what they give to the best center in

0:02:46.600 --> 0:02:50.359
<v Speaker 1>college football. His tape is outstanding. Again, like it's it's

0:02:50.480 --> 0:02:52.400
<v Speaker 1>rare to have a draft class where you're like, this

0:02:52.440 --> 0:02:54.360
<v Speaker 1>center is going to go in the first round, Like

0:02:54.400 --> 0:02:58.080
<v Speaker 1>that doesn't happen very often. And I tend to agree

0:02:58.120 --> 0:03:01.480
<v Speaker 1>with you. I think I think Tyler beotis kind of,

0:03:01.760 --> 0:03:04.240
<v Speaker 1>in my opinion, is kind of a convenient scapegoat, like

0:03:04.280 --> 0:03:07.399
<v Speaker 1>he's certainly he's not Travis Frederick. I think we've talked

0:03:07.400 --> 0:03:10.120
<v Speaker 1>about this before, like they could upgrade the position. But

0:03:10.160 --> 0:03:12.440
<v Speaker 1>I do agree with you that there are bigger problems,

0:03:12.680 --> 0:03:16.520
<v Speaker 1>namely right now left guard. In my opinion, but I

0:03:16.560 --> 0:03:20.160
<v Speaker 1>just think people see they're basically we weren't very good

0:03:20.160 --> 0:03:22.480
<v Speaker 1>at center. There's a great center in the draft. He

0:03:22.600 --> 0:03:25.000
<v Speaker 1>kind of fits into the range of where the Cowboys pick,

0:03:25.080 --> 0:03:27.079
<v Speaker 1>and it just makes sense. How much do you think

0:03:27.680 --> 0:03:31.120
<v Speaker 1>this offensive line going from what it was when they

0:03:31.160 --> 0:03:33.320
<v Speaker 1>were at their peak here a few years ago to

0:03:33.400 --> 0:03:35.360
<v Speaker 1>where they are now is about the fact that they

0:03:35.400 --> 0:03:38.160
<v Speaker 1>know along a half of Travis Frederick and maybe getting

0:03:38.160 --> 0:03:41.520
<v Speaker 1>a dominant, more dominant center maybe makes gets them back

0:03:41.560 --> 0:03:44.880
<v Speaker 1>to that area. Yeah, I hate to be a buzz

0:03:45.000 --> 0:03:47.480
<v Speaker 1>kill a few years ago. I mean they were at

0:03:47.480 --> 0:03:50.920
<v Speaker 1>their peak in twenty sixteen. I mean that's feeling like

0:03:50.960 --> 0:03:53.640
<v Speaker 1>ancient history at this point. Yeah, I think having it

0:03:53.680 --> 0:03:55.960
<v Speaker 1>we're in another building, believe it or not. Yea, having

0:03:56.040 --> 0:04:00.600
<v Speaker 1>an all pro center, yes, huge, Travis Frederick is vastly underrated.

0:04:00.640 --> 0:04:03.640
<v Speaker 1>Tyrn Smith was a lot healthier back then. Ron Leary

0:04:04.560 --> 0:04:07.160
<v Speaker 1>was the best left guard of the era that I've

0:04:07.200 --> 0:04:11.120
<v Speaker 1>covered the team probably and all of those things tie together. Sorry, Nick,

0:04:11.160 --> 0:04:14.960
<v Speaker 1>I didn't cut you off. No, I think it's true. Yeah,

0:04:15.120 --> 0:04:18.080
<v Speaker 1>I think that Frederick that's a big part of it.

0:04:18.360 --> 0:04:21.440
<v Speaker 1>And then also, like you said, Tyrn Smith being injured

0:04:21.480 --> 0:04:23.560
<v Speaker 1>us I think a bigger issue. But anytime you got

0:04:23.600 --> 0:04:27.320
<v Speaker 1>a guy that's making the line calls there, anytime you

0:04:27.360 --> 0:04:29.279
<v Speaker 1>got a guy making the line calls, I think that's

0:04:29.320 --> 0:04:31.200
<v Speaker 1>going to be the biggest issue. Is the fact that

0:04:31.279 --> 0:04:35.279
<v Speaker 1>like just they don't have the continuity that they had before,

0:04:35.320 --> 0:04:37.239
<v Speaker 1>and I think, be honest, has got a lot of issues.

0:04:37.520 --> 0:04:39.839
<v Speaker 1>Strength is one of them. And then just just kind

0:04:39.839 --> 0:04:43.480
<v Speaker 1>of understanding the game as a young player, and you know,

0:04:43.640 --> 0:04:46.320
<v Speaker 1>not everybody did it as smoothly as Frederick does. Do

0:04:46.360 --> 0:04:48.479
<v Speaker 1>you think that? And I know we've talked about this

0:04:48.520 --> 0:04:51.040
<v Speaker 1>in previous weeks, but to Amber's point, do you think

0:04:51.120 --> 0:04:54.720
<v Speaker 1>that maybe the reason why the Cowboys would consider, if

0:04:54.720 --> 0:04:58.039
<v Speaker 1>they really are considering a center that high, is because

0:04:58.080 --> 0:05:01.080
<v Speaker 1>they feel like if you get a more dominant center,

0:05:01.400 --> 0:05:04.640
<v Speaker 1>it helps your left guard problem. And maybe Connor mcgovernment

0:05:04.720 --> 0:05:07.080
<v Speaker 1>becomes viable at that point. I don't know, maybe not,

0:05:07.240 --> 0:05:09.200
<v Speaker 1>but I'm just saying maybe that's the way they're looking

0:05:09.200 --> 0:05:10.839
<v Speaker 1>at is you give me a dominant center, maybe my

0:05:10.920 --> 0:05:13.359
<v Speaker 1>left guard becomes a little less of a problem. I

0:05:13.360 --> 0:05:15.920
<v Speaker 1>think you can apply that to either spot. Really, I mean,

0:05:16.760 --> 0:05:19.159
<v Speaker 1>Zion Johnson and Kenyan Greener names you're going to hear

0:05:19.200 --> 0:05:22.520
<v Speaker 1>a lot too if you haven't already. They're arguably the

0:05:22.560 --> 0:05:24.800
<v Speaker 1>best guards in this class. I think one of them

0:05:24.839 --> 0:05:26.880
<v Speaker 1>could make Tyler Beotish look a lot better. But yeah,

0:05:26.920 --> 0:05:29.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean making the calls and again I learned this

0:05:29.880 --> 0:05:33.080
<v Speaker 1>from Brian Broadus, Like just go watch tape of Travis

0:05:33.120 --> 0:05:36.039
<v Speaker 1>Frederick or any like great center and the way that

0:05:36.080 --> 0:05:38.479
<v Speaker 1>they are able to cut a defense in half by

0:05:38.520 --> 0:05:41.280
<v Speaker 1>holding the point of attack in the middle. It's invaluable.

0:05:41.760 --> 0:05:44.960
<v Speaker 1>You don't like, you take linebackers out of the play.

0:05:45.040 --> 0:05:47.839
<v Speaker 1>You cut off a lot of backside tackles. I think

0:05:47.839 --> 0:05:51.559
<v Speaker 1>they missed that tremendously and that Yeah, identifying things before

0:05:51.600 --> 0:05:55.560
<v Speaker 1>the snap, Tyler Linderbaum would make this team a lot

0:05:55.600 --> 0:05:58.240
<v Speaker 1>better in a hurry, I think. I know. I said

0:05:58.279 --> 0:06:00.640
<v Speaker 1>I didn't think Beotish was a big problem, but I

0:06:00.680 --> 0:06:03.240
<v Speaker 1>do think that would be an upgrade. Yeah, Which that's

0:06:03.279 --> 0:06:05.040
<v Speaker 1>the thing about the draft too. You kind of want

0:06:05.040 --> 0:06:07.000
<v Speaker 1>to be in a position where you can draft players.

0:06:07.040 --> 0:06:08.960
<v Speaker 1>I'll just make you better, not necessary. I got to

0:06:08.960 --> 0:06:11.839
<v Speaker 1>feel holes, and that's why you would hope going into

0:06:11.839 --> 0:06:14.000
<v Speaker 1>the draft they don't have a lot of glaring holes.

0:06:14.000 --> 0:06:17.000
<v Speaker 1>Why we're just making eyeball emojis at the left guard

0:06:17.040 --> 0:06:19.360
<v Speaker 1>spot right now, Like, what the hell's going on? Right?

0:06:19.680 --> 0:06:22.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean, if you ever ever you remember that one

0:06:22.160 --> 0:06:27.640
<v Speaker 1>center that wasn't very smart, neither that doesn't happen. The

0:06:27.720 --> 0:06:30.240
<v Speaker 1>good centers are the ones that understand the game. They

0:06:30.320 --> 0:06:33.599
<v Speaker 1>understand what's happening before it even gets there. So I

0:06:33.640 --> 0:06:36.640
<v Speaker 1>think that that's also invaluable too, just to have a

0:06:36.680 --> 0:06:39.600
<v Speaker 1>guy that knows kind of what the defense is trying

0:06:39.640 --> 0:06:42.760
<v Speaker 1>to do and they can get everybody in order. I mean,

0:06:43.160 --> 0:06:45.640
<v Speaker 1>Mark Stavnoski wasn't the best center. I mean it wasn't

0:06:45.680 --> 0:06:47.680
<v Speaker 1>the best player on that little lines, but he was

0:06:47.760 --> 0:06:50.040
<v Speaker 1>kind of the anchor there because he kind of you know,

0:06:50.160 --> 0:06:52.640
<v Speaker 1>keeps it, keeps it all going and under and gets

0:06:52.720 --> 0:06:56.000
<v Speaker 1>everybody kind of in position to see what's happening next.

0:06:56.360 --> 0:06:59.960
<v Speaker 1>All right, to your point and why you were taught

0:07:00.000 --> 0:07:01.839
<v Speaker 1>talking about, you know, having someone that can help the

0:07:01.839 --> 0:07:05.760
<v Speaker 1>guy next to you, I mean I think would you

0:07:05.880 --> 0:07:08.400
<v Speaker 1>rather have that person be in the center or would

0:07:08.400 --> 0:07:11.080
<v Speaker 1>you rather have that person be the guy that's on

0:07:11.320 --> 0:07:15.400
<v Speaker 1>guard playing guard in a scenario where maybe a guy

0:07:15.480 --> 0:07:19.960
<v Speaker 1>like Tyrn Smith goes out at some point, then you have,

0:07:20.240 --> 0:07:23.200
<v Speaker 1>you know what I mean, like who's then at left

0:07:23.240 --> 0:07:26.480
<v Speaker 1>tackle at that point? And how much like you know,

0:07:26.520 --> 0:07:29.720
<v Speaker 1>who would be more? Where is the experience the most

0:07:29.760 --> 0:07:33.920
<v Speaker 1>beneficial within the old line? And to me, I wouldn't

0:07:33.920 --> 0:07:36.119
<v Speaker 1>say it's centered right now. Well, but here's the issue.

0:07:36.880 --> 0:07:39.680
<v Speaker 1>What I think it still comes back to is and Dave,

0:07:39.760 --> 0:07:42.360
<v Speaker 1>you mentioned a couple of guards. Is Linda Round better

0:07:42.360 --> 0:07:44.920
<v Speaker 1>than those guards? If he's better than those guards, I

0:07:44.920 --> 0:07:47.000
<v Speaker 1>don't want the Cowboys going into a draft saying, what,

0:07:47.080 --> 0:07:48.800
<v Speaker 1>we really need a guard, so let's pass up a

0:07:48.800 --> 0:07:51.160
<v Speaker 1>better center in order to get a lesser guard just

0:07:51.200 --> 0:07:53.520
<v Speaker 1>because we think we need a guard. I think take

0:07:53.600 --> 0:07:56.080
<v Speaker 1>the better player, which is again why I don't think

0:07:56.080 --> 0:07:57.760
<v Speaker 1>it's ever a good idea to go into the draft

0:07:57.760 --> 0:08:00.000
<v Speaker 1>with glaring holes, because you got holes, then you got

0:08:00.120 --> 0:08:02.160
<v Speaker 1>just feel the whole, and you take a lesser player

0:08:02.240 --> 0:08:08.920
<v Speaker 1>sometimes than taking the better player. Okay, I was just

0:08:09.000 --> 0:08:13.000
<v Speaker 1>taking they have not. So it does as Dave was saying,

0:08:13.040 --> 0:08:15.640
<v Speaker 1>you got those big guys looking might not look guard

0:08:15.720 --> 0:08:18.280
<v Speaker 1>like that, looks like a glaring holder. They don't. They

0:08:18.280 --> 0:08:20.360
<v Speaker 1>don't even think like that. They don't even think about

0:08:20.680 --> 0:08:23.160
<v Speaker 1>this year's team. I think they're looking at it. Who's

0:08:23.160 --> 0:08:25.600
<v Speaker 1>the better player in three years? Who's going to be

0:08:25.600 --> 0:08:27.720
<v Speaker 1>the better player or the center or this guard or

0:08:27.720 --> 0:08:31.400
<v Speaker 1>this tackle. Honestly, I mean we're forgetting the tackles, but

0:08:31.440 --> 0:08:33.840
<v Speaker 1>I think I think if they're if if it's all equal,

0:08:33.880 --> 0:08:35.839
<v Speaker 1>if there's a guard, a center, and a tackle that

0:08:35.920 --> 0:08:37.640
<v Speaker 1>are all sitting there that are equal. I think they

0:08:37.679 --> 0:08:39.800
<v Speaker 1>take the tackle. I don't know how much that helps

0:08:39.840 --> 0:08:41.920
<v Speaker 1>you this year, But they don't always look at it

0:08:41.960 --> 0:08:44.679
<v Speaker 1>that way. Yeah no, and that's Karti Wood because if

0:08:44.679 --> 0:08:46.840
<v Speaker 1>he doesn't win, he's probably not the coach. Yeah right,

0:08:46.920 --> 0:08:48.360
<v Speaker 1>But I don't think they look at it that way.

0:08:48.800 --> 0:08:51.880
<v Speaker 1>That's that's good in a vacuum, that's what they should do.

0:08:52.000 --> 0:08:55.680
<v Speaker 1>But that's what makes this so weird is they haven't

0:08:55.840 --> 0:08:58.719
<v Speaker 1>done They're not They have not done things they need

0:08:58.800 --> 0:09:02.480
<v Speaker 1>to do to make this team viable. Like if they would,

0:09:02.480 --> 0:09:04.640
<v Speaker 1>it's small practice to go into a draft like, man,

0:09:04.640 --> 0:09:06.439
<v Speaker 1>we better come out of here with one of these guards.

0:09:06.840 --> 0:09:09.000
<v Speaker 1>But that's what it looks like right now. Their options

0:09:09.000 --> 0:09:11.760
<v Speaker 1>are a seventh round pick and a guy that they

0:09:11.800 --> 0:09:13.800
<v Speaker 1>benched when they gave him a chance last year, and

0:09:13.840 --> 0:09:16.400
<v Speaker 1>they're the only swing tackle right now is a fourth

0:09:16.440 --> 0:09:19.520
<v Speaker 1>round pick who didn't play a snap. And it's cool.

0:09:19.679 --> 0:09:23.040
<v Speaker 1>McCarthy mentioned Matt Farniac and Josh Ball by name when

0:09:23.080 --> 0:09:25.640
<v Speaker 1>we asked him about it last week at the owner's meetings.

0:09:25.679 --> 0:09:30.200
<v Speaker 1>But the great Bradsham it left a big impression on me.

0:09:30.240 --> 0:09:32.840
<v Speaker 1>He once said, hope is not a strategy, and hoping

0:09:33.160 --> 0:09:36.240
<v Speaker 1>that those guys look great during the season because they're

0:09:36.240 --> 0:09:39.160
<v Speaker 1>out here working out doesn't make me feel any better.

0:09:39.200 --> 0:09:41.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't know about anybody else. You think they have

0:09:41.120 --> 0:09:44.440
<v Speaker 1>a different opinion of McGovern than what they have shown

0:09:44.880 --> 0:09:48.920
<v Speaker 1>or telling us, perhaps, But what they've shown is that

0:09:49.080 --> 0:09:50.920
<v Speaker 1>they gave him a chance and then they benched him

0:09:50.920 --> 0:09:53.000
<v Speaker 1>for guy that had no future being here, Right, that's

0:09:53.160 --> 0:09:56.079
<v Speaker 1>point they've shown. They've not shown us they haven't trust

0:09:56.080 --> 0:09:58.400
<v Speaker 1>in him, But the fact that they haven't signed anybody,

0:09:58.800 --> 0:10:00.880
<v Speaker 1>maybe they're showing us that they maybe do have some

0:10:00.920 --> 0:10:03.800
<v Speaker 1>trust in him. Dead guys that are out there aren't better, right.

0:10:04.480 --> 0:10:06.480
<v Speaker 1>Actions speak a hell of a lot louder than words.

0:10:06.520 --> 0:10:08.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean, yeah, they gave him a shot, and it

0:10:08.320 --> 0:10:10.360
<v Speaker 1>may for what Nick just said, it makes all the

0:10:10.400 --> 0:10:11.960
<v Speaker 1>sense in the world to leave him in there, and

0:10:11.960 --> 0:10:15.840
<v Speaker 1>they didn't. So and maybe maybe they're right, maybe the

0:10:15.840 --> 0:10:19.120
<v Speaker 1>guys available aren't better. But we all really saw it

0:10:19.160 --> 0:10:22.000
<v Speaker 1>with Terrence Steele when everybody thought he was terrible, they

0:10:22.080 --> 0:10:24.520
<v Speaker 1>kept him in there, so we know they've done it.

0:10:24.720 --> 0:10:28.040
<v Speaker 1>I have a different and they kept doing it because

0:10:28.080 --> 0:10:31.080
<v Speaker 1>they had faith. They gave him the hook. They were like, no,

0:10:31.240 --> 0:10:33.480
<v Speaker 1>thank you, We'll go back to the other honor. I

0:10:33.520 --> 0:10:35.080
<v Speaker 1>do kind of think that's the way they look at

0:10:35.120 --> 0:10:36.920
<v Speaker 1>Beadiest a little bit. I think they look at him

0:10:36.960 --> 0:10:39.360
<v Speaker 1>like Terren Steele. I think they think he's an ascending player.

0:10:39.440 --> 0:10:42.360
<v Speaker 1>I think that's what they believe. But I get like,

0:10:42.720 --> 0:10:45.120
<v Speaker 1>that's honestly, that's fine with me. Like I do not

0:10:45.320 --> 0:10:49.800
<v Speaker 1>think Tyler is the I don't think he's this problem

0:10:49.840 --> 0:10:52.839
<v Speaker 1>that must be fixed right now. Like I said, lender

0:10:52.880 --> 0:10:55.600
<v Speaker 1>Bomb's there and you feel good about it, do it.

0:10:55.760 --> 0:10:58.360
<v Speaker 1>But I'm not one of these people that's like, they

0:10:58.360 --> 0:11:00.480
<v Speaker 1>gotta come out of this draft with Tyler under bomb.

0:11:01.520 --> 0:11:03.800
<v Speaker 1>But I'm sitting here right now thinking, like, man, it

0:11:03.880 --> 0:11:05.680
<v Speaker 1>might be kind of dicey for y'all if you don't

0:11:05.720 --> 0:11:07.080
<v Speaker 1>find a way to get a guard with one of

0:11:07.080 --> 0:11:09.480
<v Speaker 1>your first two picks. But sometimes, though, you do have

0:11:09.520 --> 0:11:13.360
<v Speaker 1>to look at the entire class, look at it and

0:11:13.400 --> 0:11:15.880
<v Speaker 1>go all right, if we want to get a guard

0:11:15.920 --> 0:11:19.280
<v Speaker 1>and a center, we get linderbaumb here at center. He's

0:11:19.320 --> 0:11:22.040
<v Speaker 1>better than Beyondest and he plays immediately. If we get

0:11:22.080 --> 0:11:24.080
<v Speaker 1>a guard here and we want to get a center later,

0:11:24.480 --> 0:11:28.640
<v Speaker 1>that we're just getting another another Farniac or be honest

0:11:28.679 --> 0:11:31.040
<v Speaker 1>in the fourth or fifth round, and then we're trying

0:11:31.040 --> 0:11:32.760
<v Speaker 1>to figure you know what I mean. So if they

0:11:33.040 --> 0:11:35.920
<v Speaker 1>might look at it and go guard, we could probably

0:11:35.920 --> 0:11:37.720
<v Speaker 1>still get a guard in the second, third, or fourth

0:11:37.760 --> 0:11:39.920
<v Speaker 1>round that could compete with McGovern. If we don't get

0:11:39.920 --> 0:11:41.280
<v Speaker 1>the center here, that we're not going to get one.

0:11:41.679 --> 0:11:45.000
<v Speaker 1>That's a good point. Yeah, And that's all the fine

0:11:45.080 --> 0:11:47.400
<v Speaker 1>points of drafting that you don't really think about when

0:11:47.400 --> 0:11:48.959
<v Speaker 1>you're just looking at it in a vacuum, like, well,

0:11:48.960 --> 0:11:50.400
<v Speaker 1>you gotta make this pick here, and you gotta make

0:11:50.400 --> 0:11:52.280
<v Speaker 1>this pick here. There's a bigger picture to it, and

0:11:52.360 --> 0:11:54.400
<v Speaker 1>there's a story there. I mean, Bill Parcels did it

0:11:54.440 --> 0:11:57.040
<v Speaker 1>in the second round. He wanted Jason Witten, but he

0:11:57.040 --> 0:11:59.440
<v Speaker 1>didn't take him because he didn't he thought they were

0:11:59.640 --> 0:12:02.880
<v Speaker 1>way more tight ends available. There's not another center. He

0:12:02.920 --> 0:12:07.800
<v Speaker 1>took Al Johnson, Yeah, and stayed. He ripped the door off.

0:12:07.800 --> 0:12:10.800
<v Speaker 1>He was practiced about it and so but he ended

0:12:10.880 --> 0:12:13.640
<v Speaker 1>up getting him in the third round and he turned anywhere,

0:12:13.840 --> 0:12:15.079
<v Speaker 1>turned out to be a good player. And now he's

0:12:15.080 --> 0:12:18.120
<v Speaker 1>out of mur and Al Johnson is a Johnson? Where

0:12:18.160 --> 0:12:21.000
<v Speaker 1>is Al Johnson? Al Johnson is coaching Division two football.

0:12:21.360 --> 0:12:25.520
<v Speaker 1>We believe in East Central University in Oklahoma. Good stuff.

0:12:25.760 --> 0:12:27.800
<v Speaker 1>He's had two years and he's been a pretty good

0:12:27.800 --> 0:12:32.000
<v Speaker 1>coach there. Head coach, head coach Division two football, Al Johnson. Yeah,

0:12:32.200 --> 0:12:34.240
<v Speaker 1>let it go. All right, here's what we're gonna do. Uh.

0:12:34.520 --> 0:12:36.320
<v Speaker 1>I figured today what I wanted to do on the

0:12:36.360 --> 0:12:38.439
<v Speaker 1>topic of draft is I want to go back and

0:12:38.520 --> 0:12:41.640
<v Speaker 1>look at the last five years of drafts because I

0:12:41.640 --> 0:12:44.240
<v Speaker 1>think there's a lot of you know, I think the

0:12:44.280 --> 0:12:49.200
<v Speaker 1>general consensus around media types and fans is at the

0:12:49.200 --> 0:12:52.480
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys draft pretty well. But I do think when you

0:12:52.520 --> 0:12:54.760
<v Speaker 1>look at it in isolation, I think there are some

0:12:54.840 --> 0:12:57.760
<v Speaker 1>glaring misses, and I think sometimes fans will look at

0:12:57.760 --> 0:12:59.839
<v Speaker 1>that and they'll be like, man, that just sucks, and

0:13:00.160 --> 0:13:03.360
<v Speaker 1>they're not really thinking about the totality of what they

0:13:03.400 --> 0:13:05.440
<v Speaker 1>did in each year. So what I did was I

0:13:05.440 --> 0:13:07.480
<v Speaker 1>went back and I looked at all of the picks

0:13:07.480 --> 0:13:09.880
<v Speaker 1>for the last five years. I put them in categories

0:13:09.920 --> 0:13:12.400
<v Speaker 1>by the round that they were drafted in. And I'm

0:13:12.440 --> 0:13:14.079
<v Speaker 1>gonna talk to you guys, and I want to get

0:13:14.080 --> 0:13:17.440
<v Speaker 1>your opinions on first like, what would you expect from

0:13:17.440 --> 0:13:20.320
<v Speaker 1>a player selected in this round? And then do you

0:13:20.320 --> 0:13:22.959
<v Speaker 1>think the Cowboys met it in each of these in

0:13:23.080 --> 0:13:24.680
<v Speaker 1>the in the last five years. With the picks that

0:13:24.679 --> 0:13:26.839
<v Speaker 1>they've made, that all makes sense. Yep, all right, bet

0:13:26.880 --> 0:13:30.000
<v Speaker 1>So here's the first round. Let's talk first about Michael

0:13:30.040 --> 0:13:34.559
<v Speaker 1>Parson's last year Ceedee, Lamb, Layton, Vander esh Tackle Charlton.

0:13:35.320 --> 0:13:38.120
<v Speaker 1>Those were the first round picks for the last five years.

0:13:38.160 --> 0:13:40.600
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys did not have a pick in the first round

0:13:40.640 --> 0:13:42.520
<v Speaker 1>the year that they got Tristan Hill in the second round.

0:13:42.559 --> 0:13:44.920
<v Speaker 1>That being said, what do you expect from a first

0:13:45.000 --> 0:13:47.040
<v Speaker 1>round pick? And do you think overall when you look

0:13:47.040 --> 0:13:48.960
<v Speaker 1>at that class of guys, do you think that they've

0:13:49.480 --> 0:13:53.959
<v Speaker 1>met that expectation. I don't have to use my opinion.

0:13:54.000 --> 0:13:57.200
<v Speaker 1>I know what teams think, and so a guy that

0:13:57.240 --> 0:13:59.719
<v Speaker 1>you draft in the first round depending on again, and

0:14:00.000 --> 0:14:03.720
<v Speaker 1>I got to remember too, like the way teams approach

0:14:03.760 --> 0:14:05.400
<v Speaker 1>the draft is so much different than the way we

0:14:05.440 --> 0:14:08.880
<v Speaker 1>talk about it. Pick twenty is not obviously, it's not

0:14:08.920 --> 0:14:10.840
<v Speaker 1>the same as pick one. Pick eight's not the same

0:14:10.840 --> 0:14:14.120
<v Speaker 1>as pick seventeen. Like, most teams have fifteen to twenty

0:14:14.160 --> 0:14:17.480
<v Speaker 1>first round grades on players, so that matters too. So

0:14:17.800 --> 0:14:21.160
<v Speaker 1>if you're a top of the first round grade pick

0:14:21.240 --> 0:14:25.520
<v Speaker 1>one through probably pick ten where Michael was drafted. You're

0:14:25.520 --> 0:14:27.760
<v Speaker 1>supposed to be an immediate impact player and like a

0:14:27.800 --> 0:14:30.520
<v Speaker 1>long term difference maker, just a regular old first round

0:14:30.520 --> 0:14:34.240
<v Speaker 1>grade potential building block player and a first year starter.

0:14:34.600 --> 0:14:37.480
<v Speaker 1>So if you look at that in that vacuum, Mike

0:14:37.560 --> 0:14:42.080
<v Speaker 1>Ka checks the box CD again. Maybe people thought he

0:14:42.200 --> 0:14:44.120
<v Speaker 1>was grade at higher than he wound up being taken.

0:14:44.120 --> 0:14:47.520
<v Speaker 1>But where you take a guy seventeenth, first year starter,

0:14:47.600 --> 0:14:53.240
<v Speaker 1>potential building block absolutely Layton vander Esh, that's tricky. I

0:14:53.240 --> 0:14:55.960
<v Speaker 1>mean that he looked like it. He absolutely looked like that,

0:14:56.000 --> 0:14:59.360
<v Speaker 1>and it hasn't turned out to be the case. It's

0:14:59.400 --> 0:15:02.200
<v Speaker 1>worth note to his credit that they got four years

0:15:02.200 --> 0:15:06.280
<v Speaker 1>of starting ability out of him, but for where he

0:15:06.360 --> 0:15:08.760
<v Speaker 1>was taken and where he was and where it wound

0:15:08.800 --> 0:15:10.800
<v Speaker 1>up going, I think it's fair to call that disappointing.

0:15:10.840 --> 0:15:14.520
<v Speaker 1>And then obviously Taco is just the worst miss of

0:15:14.560 --> 0:15:17.680
<v Speaker 1>the Will McClay era. There's no other way to phrase it. Yeah, yeah,

0:15:18.200 --> 0:15:21.280
<v Speaker 1>I don't know about that. I mean, I mean your

0:15:21.320 --> 0:15:24.880
<v Speaker 1>twenty eighth overall pick. I mean, who's worse. Well, I

0:15:24.880 --> 0:15:26.920
<v Speaker 1>mean what they did the next year was just as bad,

0:15:27.240 --> 0:15:32.000
<v Speaker 1>don't you think. I mean Tristan Hill yeah, I mean Cooper.

0:15:32.080 --> 0:15:34.200
<v Speaker 1>Amari Cooper is what I'm talking about. They traded for

0:15:34.200 --> 0:15:36.440
<v Speaker 1>Amari Cooper and then they didn't even resign him and

0:15:36.480 --> 0:15:38.720
<v Speaker 1>keep him a long term Your first round pick played

0:15:38.760 --> 0:15:41.200
<v Speaker 1>three years. That's a bus. That's just like Taco Charlton,

0:15:41.400 --> 0:15:43.440
<v Speaker 1>and it costs you twenty million dollars to do it.

0:15:43.560 --> 0:15:46.320
<v Speaker 1>If you're gonna spend your first round pick and go

0:15:46.400 --> 0:15:49.280
<v Speaker 1>get Amari Cooper, he'd better be a guy that you

0:15:49.400 --> 0:15:52.840
<v Speaker 1>keep long term, not because your offensive coordinators not throwing

0:15:52.920 --> 0:15:54.600
<v Speaker 1>him the ball and it doesn't work out, and he's

0:15:54.640 --> 0:15:57.240
<v Speaker 1>kind of quiet and doesn't have the same ra ra attitude,

0:15:57.240 --> 0:15:59.560
<v Speaker 1>so let's get rid of him. Like, I mean, that's

0:15:59.560 --> 0:16:02.480
<v Speaker 1>a bus as big as anybody else as far as

0:16:02.520 --> 0:16:04.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm concerned. That's your first round pick. And I look

0:16:05.000 --> 0:16:07.800
<v Speaker 1>at it very simple. If you're not going to give

0:16:07.840 --> 0:16:12.000
<v Speaker 1>him a fifth year option, that shows kind of what

0:16:12.040 --> 0:16:14.680
<v Speaker 1>they think. Taco wouldn't even hear Layton didn't get a

0:16:14.680 --> 0:16:18.160
<v Speaker 1>fifth year option. We'll see about CD. I mean, I

0:16:18.160 --> 0:16:20.440
<v Speaker 1>think i'd be hard pressed. I think he doesn't, right,

0:16:20.440 --> 0:16:23.160
<v Speaker 1>I would think probably he will. He's on track for it.

0:16:23.200 --> 0:16:25.000
<v Speaker 1>But that's why I look at it like and I

0:16:25.000 --> 0:16:28.880
<v Speaker 1>think seventeen, eighteen, and nineteen. The guys that were in

0:16:28.920 --> 0:16:32.760
<v Speaker 1>those first round picks or traded for are they didn't

0:16:32.760 --> 0:16:35.400
<v Speaker 1>get first round options, and it just backed into Layton

0:16:35.480 --> 0:16:37.880
<v Speaker 1>because his price went so low they weren't playing on

0:16:38.080 --> 0:16:41.880
<v Speaker 1>keeping him. But he's here. I just disagree in the sense.

0:16:42.000 --> 0:16:45.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, Amari Cooper was everything he was advertised to be.

0:16:45.160 --> 0:16:47.680
<v Speaker 1>He came in and saved that season. He made their

0:16:47.680 --> 0:16:49.880
<v Speaker 1>passing attack one of the most explosive in the league

0:16:49.880 --> 0:16:51.800
<v Speaker 1>for the time that he was here. They liked him

0:16:51.880 --> 0:16:53.960
<v Speaker 1>enough to sign him to the extension. Remember they traded

0:16:54.000 --> 0:16:56.400
<v Speaker 1>for him, not they were like, we're gonna get like

0:16:56.840 --> 0:16:58.800
<v Speaker 1>eighteen games out of this guy. We don't, I mean,

0:16:58.880 --> 0:17:00.680
<v Speaker 1>we don't know what his long term future is. They

0:17:00.760 --> 0:17:04.240
<v Speaker 1>gave him the deal, and it's it is a purely

0:17:04.280 --> 0:17:06.679
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys decision that he's not here. It's not that he

0:17:06.760 --> 0:17:09.399
<v Speaker 1>wasn't good enough, right but right. That's why when I

0:17:09.440 --> 0:17:11.440
<v Speaker 1>say it was a bust, he's not a bust. Yeah,

0:17:11.480 --> 0:17:13.919
<v Speaker 1>I'm talking. I'm talking to the cow You're saying the

0:17:13.920 --> 0:17:16.440
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys wasted the first round was the number we heard

0:17:16.840 --> 0:17:19.639
<v Speaker 1>over and over and over when they trade it for him.

0:17:19.680 --> 0:17:23.080
<v Speaker 1>Twenty four that was the number. He's only twenty four,

0:17:23.280 --> 0:17:27.640
<v Speaker 1>ye twenty seven, and he's playing one and they got

0:17:27.640 --> 0:17:30.360
<v Speaker 1>a fifth round pick for him, So that to me

0:17:30.720 --> 0:17:32.760
<v Speaker 1>does not look like a good a good move. And

0:17:32.800 --> 0:17:36.320
<v Speaker 1>they're in cap hell because of some of the moves

0:17:36.320 --> 0:17:37.560
<v Speaker 1>that they made to get him. I mean, so I

0:17:37.600 --> 0:17:39.360
<v Speaker 1>just don't I don't want to just gloss over that

0:17:39.400 --> 0:17:42.719
<v Speaker 1>one and say, well that year, I hear you, and

0:17:42.760 --> 0:17:45.560
<v Speaker 1>I just I mean, look, I think it's asinine that

0:17:45.640 --> 0:17:47.399
<v Speaker 1>he's not on this team. And the fact that they

0:17:47.440 --> 0:17:50.200
<v Speaker 1>were trying trying to trade for DeVante maybe not trying

0:17:50.240 --> 0:17:53.200
<v Speaker 1>to trade, they were interested in trading for DeVante Parker. Yeah,

0:17:53.320 --> 0:17:56.040
<v Speaker 1>they who cost a third round pick and had like

0:17:56.040 --> 0:17:58.919
<v Speaker 1>a seven million dollar cap hit, so like obviously less

0:18:00.200 --> 0:18:02.439
<v Speaker 1>but you're interested in doing all that for a receiver

0:18:02.480 --> 0:18:04.800
<v Speaker 1>when you just already had a guy who, by the way,

0:18:05.000 --> 0:18:08.280
<v Speaker 1>his salary already looks less imposing than it used to

0:18:08.359 --> 0:18:10.800
<v Speaker 1>because like three new guys have signed deals since he

0:18:10.840 --> 0:18:14.360
<v Speaker 1>got traded. Stefan Diggs is a twenty four million dollar player. Now,

0:18:14.400 --> 0:18:17.240
<v Speaker 1>by the way, I think it's ridiculous. But having said

0:18:17.280 --> 0:18:19.560
<v Speaker 1>all of that, and another, by the way, what have

0:18:19.640 --> 0:18:23.200
<v Speaker 1>you done with the money that you say, Mmm, interesting,

0:18:23.720 --> 0:18:27.879
<v Speaker 1>I still say, Taco Charlton just signed with his fifth team.

0:18:27.960 --> 0:18:30.280
<v Speaker 1>He's a Saint now. Yeah, he has eleven and a

0:18:30.320 --> 0:18:34.480
<v Speaker 1>half career sacks. He's never he started seven career games,

0:18:34.520 --> 0:18:38.200
<v Speaker 1>like he was the worst decision objectively than Amari Cooper

0:18:38.520 --> 0:18:42.040
<v Speaker 1>in my opinion, many does Gregory have like seventeen. I'll

0:18:42.080 --> 0:18:43.879
<v Speaker 1>just laugh at it because I mean, he still has

0:18:43.880 --> 0:18:46.440
<v Speaker 1>eleven sacks. Ye, Like, I'm not saying he's a good player,

0:18:46.440 --> 0:18:48.040
<v Speaker 1>and I have said it a thousand times. If his

0:18:48.119 --> 0:18:49.720
<v Speaker 1>name was John Charlton, he would have been a fourth

0:18:49.800 --> 0:18:53.640
<v Speaker 1>round pick. I just think I believe that. I don't

0:18:53.680 --> 0:18:56.560
<v Speaker 1>think that matters. Doesn't Nick tell me that doesn't matter.

0:18:56.560 --> 0:18:58.280
<v Speaker 1>I think, Please tell me that doesn't. I don't think.

0:18:58.359 --> 0:18:59.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if he would have been a fourth

0:18:59.640 --> 0:19:04.080
<v Speaker 1>round but I I think that just got the novelty

0:19:04.119 --> 0:19:06.840
<v Speaker 1>of a guy named Taco. Guy named Taco, let's get him,

0:19:06.880 --> 0:19:09.760
<v Speaker 1>Like you really think that's the way it goes, Which

0:19:09.800 --> 0:19:11.800
<v Speaker 1>is funny because I think his real name is cooler

0:19:11.800 --> 0:19:19.840
<v Speaker 1>than the name Tacos Dante. Yeah, oh no either God,

0:19:20.840 --> 0:19:22.600
<v Speaker 1>And sometimes I feel like I'm the only one that

0:19:22.680 --> 0:19:26.440
<v Speaker 1>covers this team. No offense, we stick you stick to

0:19:26.480 --> 0:19:32.800
<v Speaker 1>the final. Nobody knew his name was Rained Dakota until

0:19:32.800 --> 0:19:34.960
<v Speaker 1>he started making plays like if this fair, you know,

0:19:34.960 --> 0:19:36.560
<v Speaker 1>if he would have been a backup and right, we

0:19:36.560 --> 0:19:38.480
<v Speaker 1>would all know he could be like his real name's

0:19:38.480 --> 0:19:42.320
<v Speaker 1>not dak Yeah, maybe I'm just a nerd for the details. Well, no,

0:19:42.400 --> 0:19:44.119
<v Speaker 1>you should be in your job and your role. You

0:19:44.160 --> 0:19:47.400
<v Speaker 1>need to be. We don't. Oh no, just I mean,

0:19:47.600 --> 0:19:51.119
<v Speaker 1>I I just think that's objectively a worse decision because

0:19:51.160 --> 0:19:55.160
<v Speaker 1>Amari Amari gave this franchise a lot in my opinion anyway.

0:19:55.200 --> 0:19:59.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean, he helped them get to two playoff appearances.

0:19:59.359 --> 0:20:02.760
<v Speaker 1>What also that decision worse is the fact that they

0:20:02.800 --> 0:20:06.879
<v Speaker 1>wanted a pass rusher they took him. There's been another

0:20:06.920 --> 0:20:10.560
<v Speaker 1>pass rusher that's been Defensive Player of the year. That's

0:20:10.560 --> 0:20:12.680
<v Speaker 1>a That's a great point too, because it's it isn't

0:20:12.720 --> 0:20:16.040
<v Speaker 1>why it's not fair to be like, you know, you

0:20:16.080 --> 0:20:18.199
<v Speaker 1>can't just look at any great player and be like, oh,

0:20:18.280 --> 0:20:20.639
<v Speaker 1>Gavin Escobar could have been Levi on Belts, like they

0:20:20.640 --> 0:20:22.520
<v Speaker 1>didn't need a running back. They never would have done that.

0:20:22.800 --> 0:20:25.600
<v Speaker 1>They were looking at pass rushers that year they brought

0:20:25.600 --> 0:20:29.080
<v Speaker 1>Watt into their building. He absolutely could have been their pick,

0:20:29.160 --> 0:20:31.760
<v Speaker 1>and they screwed it up, all of them. I'm not

0:20:31.800 --> 0:20:34.080
<v Speaker 1>singling anybody out, and they just they all have to

0:20:34.119 --> 0:20:36.199
<v Speaker 1>wear that. I do think though, it has to be

0:20:36.240 --> 0:20:39.680
<v Speaker 1>pointed out. The defensive scheme that he plays in Pittsburgh,

0:20:39.680 --> 0:20:41.400
<v Speaker 1>it's a very different kind of scheme than what they're

0:20:41.480 --> 0:20:44.200
<v Speaker 1>running here. So it does make you wonder change it that, right,

0:20:44.280 --> 0:20:46.280
<v Speaker 1>but maybe so all I'm saying is I do think

0:20:46.320 --> 0:20:48.200
<v Speaker 1>that has to be pointed out. Whether you believe it

0:20:48.200 --> 0:20:49.920
<v Speaker 1>would have made a difference or not, that's a whole

0:20:49.920 --> 0:20:51.760
<v Speaker 1>different conversation, but it's something that should be pointed out.

0:20:51.760 --> 0:20:56.199
<v Speaker 1>The twenty sack players are scheme independent in my opinion, Like,

0:20:56.440 --> 0:20:58.959
<v Speaker 1>I refuse to believe a guy that's capable of tying

0:20:59.000 --> 0:21:02.520
<v Speaker 1>stray Hand's record would be limited by whatever scheme he

0:21:02.600 --> 0:21:04.560
<v Speaker 1>played in. I don't care. And if he would be,

0:21:05.000 --> 0:21:08.560
<v Speaker 1>then nixt right, change it, Yeah, if he doesn't fit

0:21:08.560 --> 0:21:11.879
<v Speaker 1>your scheme, you know. Also, though, to be fair, like

0:21:11.920 --> 0:21:14.399
<v Speaker 1>if he if he was projected as that guy, he

0:21:14.400 --> 0:21:18.600
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't have been picked thirty fifth. Yeah, so everybody thought

0:21:18.600 --> 0:21:20.840
<v Speaker 1>that he was a little less defensive ends in the

0:21:20.920 --> 0:21:24.959
<v Speaker 1>twenties for the Cowboys, haven't really panned out the irony.

0:21:25.119 --> 0:21:27.800
<v Speaker 1>They don't pan out a lot like That's Spencer though,

0:21:28.119 --> 0:21:32.159
<v Speaker 1>wasn't bad. No, he wasn't bad. Hits at end after

0:21:32.280 --> 0:21:35.760
<v Speaker 1>about pick sixteen. I mean they happen, They definitely happen,

0:21:35.880 --> 0:21:38.879
<v Speaker 1>but they're hard to come out they are. Yeah, anyway,

0:21:38.880 --> 0:21:40.920
<v Speaker 1>were you bust say something him? Yeah, I was gonna

0:21:40.920 --> 0:21:43.359
<v Speaker 1>say that. Going back to your initial question to me,

0:21:44.000 --> 0:21:47.320
<v Speaker 1>all those guys are pretty easy to say whether they

0:21:47.320 --> 0:21:49.760
<v Speaker 1>were a bust or no, you know, like it was

0:21:49.920 --> 0:21:52.880
<v Speaker 1>there paid good or not. You know, we talked about

0:21:52.920 --> 0:21:59.240
<v Speaker 1>Taco Charlton, Amari Cooper, Ceedee lamb U, Mica Parsons. But

0:21:59.320 --> 0:22:02.320
<v Speaker 1>the one that thinking about it does get interesting, and

0:22:02.440 --> 0:22:04.600
<v Speaker 1>the only reason is because you're not We're having a

0:22:04.640 --> 0:22:08.360
<v Speaker 1>conversation yesterday and you brought up this point about late

0:22:08.440 --> 0:22:11.680
<v Speaker 1>in Vanderesh is how bad was he or how good

0:22:11.800 --> 0:22:15.640
<v Speaker 1>was he? When you really look at who was surrounding him?

0:22:15.720 --> 0:22:19.520
<v Speaker 1>A guy like Jalen Smith, like could Layton actually been

0:22:19.920 --> 0:22:23.120
<v Speaker 1>a lot better than what he actually was had he

0:22:23.840 --> 0:22:26.800
<v Speaker 1>had some other different kind of support around him? And

0:22:26.840 --> 0:22:30.440
<v Speaker 1>I think that's where that question for him specifically gets

0:22:30.440 --> 0:22:33.160
<v Speaker 1>a little interesting. If you look at if you look

0:22:33.200 --> 0:22:36.120
<v Speaker 1>at it that way, and it makes me really wonder,

0:22:36.240 --> 0:22:40.240
<v Speaker 1>like you guys's opinion on that. Do you think he

0:22:41.119 --> 0:22:43.520
<v Speaker 1>would have turned out to be a different player than

0:22:43.560 --> 0:22:47.040
<v Speaker 1>what he was or husband had he had someone different

0:22:47.080 --> 0:22:50.239
<v Speaker 1>around him? What was his worst year? This last year? Oh?

0:22:50.320 --> 0:22:51.760
<v Speaker 1>You think it was his worst year? And I'm asking

0:22:51.840 --> 0:22:54.439
<v Speaker 1>what do you think was his worst year? Because I

0:22:54.440 --> 0:22:56.359
<v Speaker 1>mean there was a lot of injuries there in between

0:22:56.640 --> 0:22:58.840
<v Speaker 1>the best year, which was his first year, and this

0:22:58.920 --> 0:23:00.760
<v Speaker 1>last year, which I thought he better this year and

0:23:00.800 --> 0:23:03.080
<v Speaker 1>he'd been playing the years before that, so to me,

0:23:03.359 --> 0:23:04.919
<v Speaker 1>but I think a lot of that was sold. There

0:23:04.960 --> 0:23:07.040
<v Speaker 1>was so many injuries and just like, I don't know

0:23:07.080 --> 0:23:09.120
<v Speaker 1>if he ever really kind of got all the way back.

0:23:09.160 --> 0:23:14.040
<v Speaker 1>What point you're making. Are you saying better players around

0:23:14.119 --> 0:23:17.560
<v Speaker 1>him have made him would have made him play better?

0:23:18.040 --> 0:23:21.400
<v Speaker 1>Or are you saying maybe better players around him limited

0:23:21.480 --> 0:23:23.920
<v Speaker 1>him from playing better? You know, because I mean last

0:23:24.000 --> 0:23:26.439
<v Speaker 1>year he had his best linebacker since he's been here,

0:23:26.560 --> 0:23:28.680
<v Speaker 1>was Micah Parsons next to him. Yeah, And I didn't

0:23:28.680 --> 0:23:30.760
<v Speaker 1>think he had a bad year. Again, I thought he

0:23:30.800 --> 0:23:32.960
<v Speaker 1>was better last year than he was the years before.

0:23:33.040 --> 0:23:36.800
<v Speaker 1>The couple of years before that, he he didn't have

0:23:36.880 --> 0:23:39.280
<v Speaker 1>a great year, in my opinion, or like a good year,

0:23:39.320 --> 0:23:42.159
<v Speaker 1>but he was better in the fact that you're not

0:23:42.240 --> 0:23:44.800
<v Speaker 1>watching the game and saying all the time, at least

0:23:44.800 --> 0:23:48.280
<v Speaker 1>for me, God, look at Laton like he's always late

0:23:48.359 --> 0:23:51.000
<v Speaker 1>for this tackle or that you know, like, yes, he's

0:23:51.000 --> 0:23:53.959
<v Speaker 1>had this moment last year, but it wasn't I feel like,

0:23:54.000 --> 0:23:57.240
<v Speaker 1>at least compared to the year before as bad as

0:23:57.280 --> 0:24:00.600
<v Speaker 1>that one. So yes, Mica maybe elevated his game a

0:24:00.600 --> 0:24:04.480
<v Speaker 1>little bit, but also previous years and what did Daylon

0:24:04.520 --> 0:24:07.600
<v Speaker 1>Smith do for him? I don't. I don't think I

0:24:07.680 --> 0:24:11.399
<v Speaker 1>buy that because top twenty picks shouldn't need you're you're

0:24:11.440 --> 0:24:14.880
<v Speaker 1>supposed to be a foundational player should Yeah, but it

0:24:14.880 --> 0:24:18.000
<v Speaker 1>should not. Yeah, but no, I just I think injuries

0:24:18.080 --> 0:24:20.760
<v Speaker 1>robbed him of some of his explosiveness and maybe even

0:24:21.800 --> 0:24:24.000
<v Speaker 1>some of his confidence in the sense that, I mean,

0:24:24.040 --> 0:24:26.080
<v Speaker 1>you kind of got to throw yourself around to be

0:24:26.119 --> 0:24:30.560
<v Speaker 1>a good linebacker, and he got hurt significantly two years

0:24:30.600 --> 0:24:32.600
<v Speaker 1>in a row doing that. And I'm not saying like

0:24:32.880 --> 0:24:35.159
<v Speaker 1>not like he was going half speed or anything or

0:24:35.200 --> 0:24:37.239
<v Speaker 1>like protecting himself. I'm not trying to say that, but

0:24:37.320 --> 0:24:41.239
<v Speaker 1>he just didn't look as explosive or as confident in

0:24:41.240 --> 0:24:43.800
<v Speaker 1>this last season as I remember him as a younger player,

0:24:43.840 --> 0:24:46.080
<v Speaker 1>and I think that's one of the interesting things about

0:24:46.160 --> 0:24:48.800
<v Speaker 1>Sean Lee. Shaun Lee had his mini injuries as anybody

0:24:48.800 --> 0:24:51.639
<v Speaker 1>you can probably name, and probably the reason why I

0:24:51.680 --> 0:24:53.840
<v Speaker 1>kept getting injuried because he never was willing to relent

0:24:53.960 --> 0:24:55.720
<v Speaker 1>and kind of take a step back and kind of

0:24:55.760 --> 0:24:58.199
<v Speaker 1>slow down a little bit, or he just always going

0:24:58.280 --> 0:25:00.959
<v Speaker 1>to be like running and gunning in whatever happens. And

0:25:01.000 --> 0:25:03.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if that's normal for a lot of guys.

0:25:03.200 --> 0:25:07.000
<v Speaker 1>In Shawn Lee is in my he's he's damn near

0:25:07.080 --> 0:25:10.199
<v Speaker 1>or one of one, like maybe Witten, But like you know,

0:25:10.320 --> 0:25:13.199
<v Speaker 1>fans want that guy that only cares about football and

0:25:13.240 --> 0:25:15.640
<v Speaker 1>we'll put the team above everything. And we always joke

0:25:15.720 --> 0:25:18.399
<v Speaker 1>that it's really not a realistic way to be about

0:25:18.480 --> 0:25:21.720
<v Speaker 1>human beings. That was Sean Lee. Man. He really didn't

0:25:21.760 --> 0:25:25.520
<v Speaker 1>care about anything other than being ane. That was from

0:25:25.560 --> 0:25:28.480
<v Speaker 1>the get go. I remember being on the train his

0:25:28.640 --> 0:25:33.119
<v Speaker 1>rookie year going from Oxnard to San Diego for a

0:25:33.160 --> 0:25:35.840
<v Speaker 1>preseason game and was supposed to go do an interview.

0:25:36.080 --> 0:25:38.440
<v Speaker 1>This is going to his first preseason game. He's gonna

0:25:38.440 --> 0:25:40.560
<v Speaker 1>go do an interview or something, and he was like

0:25:40.920 --> 0:25:43.760
<v Speaker 1>kind of just he told the PR guys like, no,

0:25:43.920 --> 0:25:46.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm not doing it. I'm not doing this because I'm

0:25:46.520 --> 0:25:48.600
<v Speaker 1>focused on this game and I got to prepare, you know.

0:25:48.960 --> 0:25:51.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm like, you're gonna play twelve snaps baby tomorrow, you know.

0:25:51.840 --> 0:25:53.840
<v Speaker 1>But he was just like, nah, that was from the

0:25:54.400 --> 0:25:56.720
<v Speaker 1>very beginning. He was just football all the way. And

0:25:57.080 --> 0:26:00.359
<v Speaker 1>you wish that that would have rubbed off on more people,

0:26:00.480 --> 0:26:02.280
<v Speaker 1>you know. I mean, Jalen Smith was here when he

0:26:02.320 --> 0:26:04.760
<v Speaker 1>was here, and I didn't rub off on him like that.

0:26:04.880 --> 0:26:06.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that wasn't Jayalen. That wasn't the way it was.

0:26:07.080 --> 0:26:10.359
<v Speaker 1>That was. That was why that's the whole snake Lee

0:26:10.480 --> 0:26:13.200
<v Speaker 1>thing with Dez. Like Sean, he came out and said it.

0:26:13.240 --> 0:26:15.320
<v Speaker 1>He was like, yeah, I mean des and I butt

0:26:15.320 --> 0:26:18.840
<v Speaker 1>head sometimes about me wanting him to be more committed

0:26:18.880 --> 0:26:21.159
<v Speaker 1>to the craft or the team or whatever. And I

0:26:21.160 --> 0:26:24.800
<v Speaker 1>mean that's why you visit all of that. Ancient. Leadership

0:26:24.920 --> 0:26:27.400
<v Speaker 1>is a very tricky word, it really is, because people

0:26:27.480 --> 0:26:29.240
<v Speaker 1>say it all the time. All he's a leader. A

0:26:29.240 --> 0:26:31.080
<v Speaker 1>lot of times, the loudest guy in the room is

0:26:31.080 --> 0:26:33.680
<v Speaker 1>the leader and also the one that all the younger

0:26:33.680 --> 0:26:36.280
<v Speaker 1>players look to. But that doesn't mean he's leading you

0:26:36.320 --> 0:26:38.520
<v Speaker 1>in the right way. And so, I mean, I think

0:26:38.600 --> 0:26:42.359
<v Speaker 1>Sean Lee certainly was um and I think Whitten was too.

0:26:42.560 --> 0:26:44.919
<v Speaker 1>But you know, leadership you also have to be a

0:26:44.960 --> 0:26:47.320
<v Speaker 1>badass player. You know, you can't just be an average

0:26:47.359 --> 0:26:49.480
<v Speaker 1>player and over there barking signals and all that when

0:26:49.480 --> 0:26:52.000
<v Speaker 1>everyone's like, what are you doing? Yeah, you mess it up.

0:26:52.160 --> 0:26:55.159
<v Speaker 1>You're about to be a basketball He's on my desk.

0:26:55.400 --> 0:26:58.040
<v Speaker 1>How they posted up shun Lee? That's my desk and

0:26:58.200 --> 0:27:02.320
<v Speaker 1>I got I've got a bigger picture on my wall too,

0:27:02.359 --> 0:27:04.000
<v Speaker 1>of a guy that was a pretty good leader too.

0:27:05.640 --> 0:27:07.080
<v Speaker 1>So what does it say about me that the guy

0:27:07.119 --> 0:27:10.000
<v Speaker 1>on my cubicle walls for Rolando McClain, I don't know.

0:27:11.160 --> 0:27:14.720
<v Speaker 1>Its okay, all right, we're gonna take our first break

0:27:14.720 --> 0:27:16.880
<v Speaker 1>when we come back. I have one more question about

0:27:16.880 --> 0:27:18.840
<v Speaker 1>these first round picks. I want to talk about Ceedee

0:27:18.920 --> 0:27:20.719
<v Speaker 1>Lamb and I want to ask you guys a question.

0:27:20.920 --> 0:27:22.879
<v Speaker 1>Where do you project his ceiling to be. Is this

0:27:22.880 --> 0:27:24.600
<v Speaker 1>a guy that can get up to that level of

0:27:24.720 --> 0:27:27.840
<v Speaker 1>top ten wide receiver throughout the NFL? Or is he

0:27:27.880 --> 0:27:29.879
<v Speaker 1>just gonna always be kind of a good wide receiver.

0:27:29.880 --> 0:27:31.040
<v Speaker 1>We'll talk about that when we come back to. This

0:27:31.000 --> 0:27:34.960
<v Speaker 1>is Dallas Cowboys dot com Radio. At ATNC, everyone new

0:27:35.000 --> 0:27:37.800
<v Speaker 1>and existing customers get our best deals on every smartphone.

0:27:38.000 --> 0:27:40.760
<v Speaker 1>Why because you deserve it for turning your living room

0:27:40.760 --> 0:27:44.280
<v Speaker 1>into your office and your gym. We're teaching. Grandma had

0:27:44.320 --> 0:27:46.960
<v Speaker 1>a video call and teaching her again. It's the button

0:27:47.000 --> 0:27:51.040
<v Speaker 1>on your left Nana, Okay, your other laughs. It's not complicated.

0:27:51.160 --> 0:27:54.440
<v Speaker 1>Everyone deserves something new. So ATNC has given everyone new

0:27:54.480 --> 0:27:57.200
<v Speaker 1>and existing customers are best deals with every unlimited plan

0:27:57.359 --> 0:28:00.359
<v Speaker 1>on every smartphone, even the latest ones at ten raleasel

0:28:00.440 --> 0:28:02.680
<v Speaker 1>Dad spat to the networks specifiestrichs and exceptions may apply.

0:28:03.359 --> 0:28:05.520
<v Speaker 1>Want to use what the pros use? How about the

0:28:05.600 --> 0:28:09.440
<v Speaker 1>official men's skincare brand of the Dallas Cowboys, Jack Black.

0:28:09.760 --> 0:28:11.879
<v Speaker 1>Right now you can get the Jack Black Starter, a

0:28:12.000 --> 0:28:14.920
<v Speaker 1>curated collection of Cowboys locker room favorites, for just ten

0:28:15.000 --> 0:28:18.280
<v Speaker 1>bucks with free shipping. The starter includes four Jack Clack

0:28:18.359 --> 0:28:21.960
<v Speaker 1>skincare favorites, plus a full sized and tense therapy lip bomb.

0:28:22.160 --> 0:28:24.720
<v Speaker 1>Go to get Jack Black dot com slash Cowboys and

0:28:24.880 --> 0:28:27.960
<v Speaker 1>use the code word team JB. That's get Jack Black

0:28:28.040 --> 0:28:32.280
<v Speaker 1>dot com slash Cowboys The Jack Black Starter ten bucks free,

0:28:32.359 --> 0:28:37.399
<v Speaker 1>shipping the Cowboys Way, where sixteen Hall of Famers and

0:28:37.560 --> 0:28:41.600
<v Speaker 1>five championships shows us what success looks like. Where Turkey

0:28:41.720 --> 0:28:44.760
<v Speaker 1>is always the second best part of Thanksgiving Day, Where

0:28:44.800 --> 0:28:48.120
<v Speaker 1>we are all defined by one single thing, the Star,

0:28:48.880 --> 0:28:51.320
<v Speaker 1>Where we as fans know it's our job to keep

0:28:51.360 --> 0:28:54.240
<v Speaker 1>the tradition going. Bank of America is proud to be

0:28:54.320 --> 0:28:57.160
<v Speaker 1>the official bank of the Dallas Cowboys and to support

0:28:57.200 --> 0:29:00.840
<v Speaker 1>the quest of living life the Cowboys Way. Copyright twenty

0:29:00.880 --> 0:29:03.880
<v Speaker 1>twenty Bank of America Corporation. Before there was a draft,

0:29:03.960 --> 0:29:06.760
<v Speaker 1>you could size up at cowboy by three simple factors.

0:29:06.960 --> 0:29:08.920
<v Speaker 1>The crease in his hat, the bend of his brim,

0:29:09.120 --> 0:29:12.600
<v Speaker 1>and his unbending attitude a man. Stetson didn't just protect

0:29:12.680 --> 0:29:15.479
<v Speaker 1>him from what life through at him, It projected a rugged,

0:29:15.720 --> 0:29:19.840
<v Speaker 1>unstoppable spirit. Stetson hats are still American, made with pride.

0:29:19.960 --> 0:29:23.040
<v Speaker 1>Right here in Texas, there's still the unofficial crowd of

0:29:23.120 --> 0:29:26.400
<v Speaker 1>all self respecting cowboys, and Stetson is proud to be

0:29:26.520 --> 0:29:29.680
<v Speaker 1>on the field with America's team. Find a retailer nearest

0:29:29.760 --> 0:29:35.520
<v Speaker 1>you at Stetson dot com. Slash Cowboys back to the

0:29:35.640 --> 0:29:39.920
<v Speaker 1>brink Sler lenses. Are we ready to go? All? Right?

0:29:39.960 --> 0:29:43.840
<v Speaker 1>Now Esseler lenses. I can't something's wrong with this headset here,

0:29:43.920 --> 0:29:47.160
<v Speaker 1>So bear with me, all right. Forget about forget about hearing,

0:29:47.200 --> 0:29:49.960
<v Speaker 1>how about seeing Esseler. Whether you're Watson from home, cheering

0:29:50.000 --> 0:29:52.800
<v Speaker 1>from the stands. Essler lenses gives you every exciting playbook

0:29:52.800 --> 0:29:55.960
<v Speaker 1>in appointment at your local Essler experts and find the

0:29:56.040 --> 0:29:59.400
<v Speaker 1>perfect lens for you. Seeymour Domore Esler, Welcome back. It

0:29:59.520 --> 0:30:01.320
<v Speaker 1>is the second segment of The Break live from the

0:30:01.840 --> 0:30:05.000
<v Speaker 1>SWBC Mortgage studios. At the start, we're talking about the draft,

0:30:05.040 --> 0:30:07.960
<v Speaker 1>and we're talking specifically about previous drafts, what the Cowboys

0:30:08.000 --> 0:30:10.560
<v Speaker 1>have done over the last five years. We're talking about

0:30:10.560 --> 0:30:12.320
<v Speaker 1>the first round. I have one more question for you

0:30:12.360 --> 0:30:14.680
<v Speaker 1>guys about the first round. Where do you see Cede

0:30:14.800 --> 0:30:17.640
<v Speaker 1>Lamb's ceiling? Because I think personally he has been a

0:30:17.800 --> 0:30:20.320
<v Speaker 1>good wide receiver. I don't think he's taken that next

0:30:20.360 --> 0:30:22.360
<v Speaker 1>step to being great. Certainly hasn't gotten to the point

0:30:22.400 --> 0:30:24.480
<v Speaker 1>where you're talking about him among the very best wide

0:30:24.480 --> 0:30:26.920
<v Speaker 1>receivers in the NFL. Do you think his ceiling is

0:30:26.920 --> 0:30:30.760
<v Speaker 1>a high? I think Cede Lamb is a victim of

0:30:31.920 --> 0:30:36.320
<v Speaker 1>pre draft hype because if he was just the seventeenth

0:30:36.360 --> 0:30:38.560
<v Speaker 1>overall pick. I'm looking at his numbers, one hundred and

0:30:38.560 --> 0:30:40.880
<v Speaker 1>fifty three catches for two thousand yards and eleven touchdowns

0:30:40.880 --> 0:30:43.680
<v Speaker 1>through two years. I mean that's objectively good. Yeah, objectively.

0:30:44.080 --> 0:30:46.160
<v Speaker 1>But he was widely seen as the best receiver in

0:30:46.240 --> 0:30:49.360
<v Speaker 1>this class. In the twenty twenty class, the joke for

0:30:49.960 --> 0:30:54.280
<v Speaker 1>years was our joke was team forty Burger. Then there

0:30:54.440 --> 0:30:57.280
<v Speaker 1>was like the whole I can't believe the league messed

0:30:57.320 --> 0:30:59.320
<v Speaker 1>up and let him fall to Dallas. How did this happen?

0:31:00.120 --> 0:31:02.640
<v Speaker 1>Leagues dumb? And the Cowboys are great and a guy

0:31:02.760 --> 0:31:05.440
<v Speaker 1>drafted behind him is having an objectively better career. I mean,

0:31:05.520 --> 0:31:08.240
<v Speaker 1>justin Jefferson looks like the guy we thought CD Lamb

0:31:08.280 --> 0:31:13.040
<v Speaker 1>and Jerry Judy would be. UM, so we always compare

0:31:13.120 --> 0:31:15.320
<v Speaker 1>him to him. I mean always compare him to Jefferson.

0:31:15.560 --> 0:31:18.720
<v Speaker 1>He could compare him to Jalen Rager or Rugs or

0:31:19.160 --> 0:31:23.560
<v Speaker 1>Judy or because the what so Judy, ruggs Lamb Rager

0:31:23.600 --> 0:31:25.480
<v Speaker 1>all went off. So the fifth receiver in the class

0:31:25.560 --> 0:31:27.640
<v Speaker 1>is objectively the best. I mean, that's why we compare him,

0:31:27.640 --> 0:31:30.200
<v Speaker 1>because it's just like, well, the next is CD the

0:31:30.320 --> 0:31:33.040
<v Speaker 1>next best of all those him? Yes? No, And that's

0:31:33.120 --> 0:31:36.680
<v Speaker 1>My thing is like CD is having an objectively good career.

0:31:37.360 --> 0:31:40.280
<v Speaker 1>It's just what he is compared to what people thought

0:31:40.280 --> 0:31:42.240
<v Speaker 1>he would be. Like there is a guy doing what

0:31:42.480 --> 0:31:45.320
<v Speaker 1>we thought CD would be doing. But I mean, I mean,

0:31:45.440 --> 0:31:49.120
<v Speaker 1>just I'm gonna throw this out there is justin Jefferson,

0:31:49.280 --> 0:31:53.520
<v Speaker 1>Like is he really a great player? He's got great stats,

0:31:54.280 --> 0:31:58.560
<v Speaker 1>but I mean he's on a team that puts up

0:31:58.560 --> 0:32:01.440
<v Speaker 1>a lot of yards instead and a quarterback that will

0:32:01.480 --> 0:32:03.520
<v Speaker 1>throw it. But I mean it's all hollow. I mean,

0:32:03.600 --> 0:32:06.240
<v Speaker 1>do they do anything, do they win anything. I'm just wondering, like,

0:32:06.480 --> 0:32:08.880
<v Speaker 1>are we sure that he's not doing a lot of

0:32:08.920 --> 0:32:11.320
<v Speaker 1>those Dak fourth quarter things where they just come back

0:32:11.360 --> 0:32:14.040
<v Speaker 1>and he's got all these stats, and I mean, but

0:32:14.200 --> 0:32:16.440
<v Speaker 1>we only compare him to Jefferson. No one compares them

0:32:16.440 --> 0:32:18.720
<v Speaker 1>to Rager or Rugs or those other guys. I mean,

0:32:18.760 --> 0:32:21.720
<v Speaker 1>I think he's been pretty good. He's just been He's

0:32:21.720 --> 0:32:23.320
<v Speaker 1>been really good. And we'll see what happens with a

0:32:23.400 --> 0:32:25.800
<v Speaker 1>Maori not here and now he's the number one. But

0:32:25.960 --> 0:32:30.160
<v Speaker 1>I just I don't I mean, because fifteen or eighteen

0:32:30.240 --> 0:32:32.760
<v Speaker 1>teams missed on Jefferson, I don't think that it should

0:32:33.200 --> 0:32:36.280
<v Speaker 1>factor on Ceedee Lamb. I think about five or ten

0:32:36.320 --> 0:32:39.640
<v Speaker 1>teams missed on Lamb too. Yeah. No, I feel like

0:32:39.680 --> 0:32:42.000
<v Speaker 1>we're saying the same thing, Ceedie. Lamb's having an objectively

0:32:42.040 --> 0:32:44.600
<v Speaker 1>good career, justin Jefferson's having a better one. Yeah, and

0:32:44.800 --> 0:32:47.440
<v Speaker 1>people thought that was what Lamb would do. And you

0:32:47.520 --> 0:32:49.440
<v Speaker 1>can say it's hollow. I mean, it's not like CD's.

0:32:49.480 --> 0:32:51.840
<v Speaker 1>It's not like the Cowboys accomplishments in the same time span.

0:32:52.040 --> 0:32:54.320
<v Speaker 1>They lost one wild card game. I mean the Vikings.

0:32:54.680 --> 0:32:56.320
<v Speaker 1>I don't have their records right in front of me,

0:32:56.400 --> 0:32:58.280
<v Speaker 1>but the Vikings have been in the conversation. Yeah, I

0:32:58.280 --> 0:32:59.640
<v Speaker 1>mean they've been right there. It seems like they're a

0:32:59.640 --> 0:33:02.400
<v Speaker 1>comparable team to the Cowboys. And they and I'll say this,

0:33:02.560 --> 0:33:05.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean he's had the same situation as CD. He

0:33:06.080 --> 0:33:09.840
<v Speaker 1>had a veteran route running guy on the other side

0:33:10.160 --> 0:33:12.520
<v Speaker 1>that's getting a lot of yards and stats as well.

0:33:12.680 --> 0:33:15.120
<v Speaker 1>And and and Jefferson, like Jefferson just went to a

0:33:15.160 --> 0:33:18.280
<v Speaker 1>team board had a premier running back. Yeah, yeah, they're

0:33:18.320 --> 0:33:20.520
<v Speaker 1>running it is. I don't do anything, that's the thing

0:33:20.640 --> 0:33:22.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean. And that's just my beef with cousins. So yeah,

0:33:22.760 --> 0:33:25.600
<v Speaker 1>I just think he's I think Vikings fans would agree. Yeah,

0:33:26.280 --> 0:33:28.320
<v Speaker 1>but but honestly, like you gotta turn and you turned

0:33:28.320 --> 0:33:29.760
<v Speaker 1>the mirror around, there are a lot of Cowboys. Fans

0:33:29.800 --> 0:33:31.479
<v Speaker 1>are thinking the same thing about the Cowboys right now.

0:33:31.480 --> 0:33:33.760
<v Speaker 1>They're just not they got a lot of talent. He's

0:33:33.920 --> 0:33:37.000
<v Speaker 1>not turned into the kind of talent that I mean.

0:33:37.040 --> 0:33:40.040
<v Speaker 1>They got a lot of people that that male Kiper

0:33:40.160 --> 0:33:43.280
<v Speaker 1>and Todd McShay said, we're talent, you know. I mean,

0:33:43.440 --> 0:33:45.200
<v Speaker 1>you know they got you got guys, And I'm the

0:33:45.320 --> 0:33:48.040
<v Speaker 1>same with the Cowboys. I'm saying cowboys too. You know,

0:33:48.200 --> 0:33:51.320
<v Speaker 1>we think Ceedee Lambs is great talent, but a lot

0:33:51.360 --> 0:33:54.920
<v Speaker 1>of teams passed on him too, like for a reason. Yeah,

0:33:54.960 --> 0:33:57.200
<v Speaker 1>I guess because he was too skinny. I guess that

0:33:57.320 --> 0:33:59.000
<v Speaker 1>was the reason. I don't size is part of it.

0:33:59.120 --> 0:34:04.240
<v Speaker 1>I think he he just does everything well and isn't

0:34:04.520 --> 0:34:07.480
<v Speaker 1>he doesn't have a super freak trait. I mean, Rugs

0:34:07.520 --> 0:34:09.560
<v Speaker 1>got drafted where he did because of how fast he was.

0:34:10.200 --> 0:34:14.160
<v Speaker 1>Judy was seen as the most polished route runner. Not

0:34:14.280 --> 0:34:16.800
<v Speaker 1>that Lamb can't do it or isn't a good route runner,

0:34:16.800 --> 0:34:19.880
<v Speaker 1>but Judy was seen as better. And people overthink these

0:34:19.960 --> 0:34:21.960
<v Speaker 1>things and you wind up fall into seventeenth when you

0:34:22.000 --> 0:34:25.120
<v Speaker 1>probably shouldn't have. But again, I think we're saying the

0:34:25.160 --> 0:34:29.759
<v Speaker 1>same thing, Like, if none of that narrative existed and

0:34:30.000 --> 0:34:33.040
<v Speaker 1>CD had just been one of like four good receivers

0:34:33.080 --> 0:34:36.799
<v Speaker 1>instead of widely seen as this amazing talent, everyone would

0:34:36.800 --> 0:34:39.560
<v Speaker 1>be very, very pleased with where he is. But because

0:34:39.600 --> 0:34:42.200
<v Speaker 1>of that hype and because a guy drafted after him

0:34:42.239 --> 0:34:43.960
<v Speaker 1>as having a better career, you kind of look at

0:34:44.000 --> 0:34:46.879
<v Speaker 1>it and you're like, Eh, I thought we'd have seen

0:34:46.960 --> 0:34:49.480
<v Speaker 1>more from LAMB. Do you guys think what we've seen

0:34:49.560 --> 0:34:52.520
<v Speaker 1>so far says that he's on track to possibly being

0:34:53.120 --> 0:34:55.440
<v Speaker 1>that upbrechelt of receiver or is it just one of

0:34:55.440 --> 0:34:57.759
<v Speaker 1>those things where you're like, you know, at this point,

0:34:57.800 --> 0:35:00.920
<v Speaker 1>you would have expected him to be more war consistent,

0:35:01.000 --> 0:35:02.879
<v Speaker 1>if that's the thing you think he's missed. I put

0:35:02.960 --> 0:35:05.919
<v Speaker 1>him as my most disappointing player from last year. Huh Yeah,

0:35:06.360 --> 0:35:08.439
<v Speaker 1>And we got killed for it because, oh my god,

0:35:08.480 --> 0:35:11.479
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't DAK but it was it was y CD.

0:35:12.200 --> 0:35:14.320
<v Speaker 1>Because I went to Oxnard, I mean because I was

0:35:14.360 --> 0:35:16.320
<v Speaker 1>there and you were there, and I thought he was

0:35:16.360 --> 0:35:17.920
<v Speaker 1>going to be like the great I thought this was

0:35:18.000 --> 0:35:21.040
<v Speaker 1>Randy Moss and it wasn't and he was beating. He

0:35:21.200 --> 0:35:24.040
<v Speaker 1>was beating a better cornerback every day than than what

0:35:24.160 --> 0:35:26.520
<v Speaker 1>he faced most of the most of the games. Um,

0:35:26.840 --> 0:35:30.960
<v Speaker 1>he didn't make those highlight playmaking type plays where you know,

0:35:31.120 --> 0:35:33.400
<v Speaker 1>and this was this dropped several of them. Yeah, and

0:35:33.480 --> 0:35:35.480
<v Speaker 1>this was Cooper Rush throwing him the ball a lot

0:35:35.520 --> 0:35:37.239
<v Speaker 1>of times, just throwing it up, just go make a play.

0:35:37.360 --> 0:35:39.719
<v Speaker 1>Made it every day. He I mean, he looked like

0:35:39.800 --> 0:35:42.040
<v Speaker 1>he was about to take over the NFL. Yeah, in Knoxnard.

0:35:42.080 --> 0:35:44.040
<v Speaker 1>That's what I was a little disappointed about. Like he said,

0:35:44.320 --> 0:35:46.680
<v Speaker 1>he's still a Pro Bowl player, I mean alternate, but

0:35:46.760 --> 0:35:48.960
<v Speaker 1>he mean he was, what, you know, top ten receiver

0:35:49.120 --> 0:35:51.520
<v Speaker 1>from last year made the Pro Bowl. I thought he

0:35:51.680 --> 0:35:52.960
<v Speaker 1>I thought he had a really good year. I thought

0:35:53.000 --> 0:35:57.160
<v Speaker 1>he was gonna be even better though. What's like, Okay,

0:35:57.360 --> 0:36:00.040
<v Speaker 1>New England. His best game was New England made a

0:36:00.200 --> 0:36:03.279
<v Speaker 1>great high point touchdown in the third or fourth quarter

0:36:03.280 --> 0:36:05.520
<v Speaker 1>and then obviously won the game in overtime. But like,

0:36:05.719 --> 0:36:10.359
<v Speaker 1>other than that, all of my most memorable Seed Lamb

0:36:10.480 --> 0:36:13.719
<v Speaker 1>moments are from his rookie year, like the touchdown against Minnesota,

0:36:13.800 --> 0:36:16.960
<v Speaker 1>the on side kick return, some of the catches down

0:36:17.040 --> 0:36:20.759
<v Speaker 1>the seam, he made against New York and Cleveland. He

0:36:20.920 --> 0:36:23.319
<v Speaker 1>just he was he was good last year. I didn't

0:36:23.320 --> 0:36:25.959
<v Speaker 1>think he was amazing. You talk about hollow. I felt

0:36:25.960 --> 0:36:27.799
<v Speaker 1>like the Pro Bowl was a little bit hollow because

0:36:27.840 --> 0:36:30.200
<v Speaker 1>he was like the second or third alternate to get it.

0:36:30.280 --> 0:36:33.120
<v Speaker 1>He had really good number he did. I feel like

0:36:33.160 --> 0:36:35.480
<v Speaker 1>a jerk because I'm like, oh, he's a disappointing or whatever.

0:36:35.520 --> 0:36:38.880
<v Speaker 1>He just he has not lived up to the gargantuan hype.

0:36:38.920 --> 0:36:42.239
<v Speaker 1>It's not to say he's a bad player. And we're

0:36:42.280 --> 0:36:44.799
<v Speaker 1>gonna find out because they got rid of they got

0:36:44.920 --> 0:36:47.200
<v Speaker 1>rid of a better receiver. He's going to be the

0:36:47.280 --> 0:36:50.080
<v Speaker 1>best receiver on this team unless something even crazier happens.

0:36:50.760 --> 0:36:53.680
<v Speaker 1>It has to be Yeah, yes, I mean I would

0:36:53.719 --> 0:36:56.600
<v Speaker 1>assume so. So it's on him now, Like they clearly

0:36:56.680 --> 0:36:58.919
<v Speaker 1>think he can be the centerpiece of their receiver corps.

0:36:58.920 --> 0:37:01.120
<v Speaker 1>And we're gonna find out the fourth best eighty eight

0:37:01.280 --> 0:37:11.080
<v Speaker 1>right now. Well, he's in this he just obviously, and

0:37:11.200 --> 0:37:12.799
<v Speaker 1>the other two guys are in the Hall of Fame.

0:37:12.880 --> 0:37:16.399
<v Speaker 1>But I'm not I'm not worried about him. He's they're

0:37:16.400 --> 0:37:18.600
<v Speaker 1>gonna pick up his option, Like I'm not worried about

0:37:19.200 --> 0:37:21.279
<v Speaker 1>you know, he's going to Yeah, he's going to keep

0:37:21.360 --> 0:37:24.239
<v Speaker 1>improving and he'll be fine. I think, I honestly think

0:37:24.280 --> 0:37:26.800
<v Speaker 1>this year he's gonna step up and become one of

0:37:26.840 --> 0:37:29.840
<v Speaker 1>those premier receivers because I think we've seen flashes of that.

0:37:30.000 --> 0:37:32.120
<v Speaker 1>We certainly have seen him make some plays. You mentioned

0:37:32.200 --> 0:37:33.960
<v Speaker 1>that Minnesota. I think that's one of the best catches

0:37:33.960 --> 0:37:36.719
<v Speaker 1>I've seen from him. Um, And I think he has

0:37:36.800 --> 0:37:39.680
<v Speaker 1>that ability to do some really remarkable things. I think

0:37:39.719 --> 0:37:41.960
<v Speaker 1>for whatever reason. And by the way, it wasn't just him.

0:37:42.120 --> 0:37:44.560
<v Speaker 1>Last year. You name a guy on this offense that

0:37:44.719 --> 0:37:47.920
<v Speaker 1>was consistent, there wasn't one. It was an inconsistent offense.

0:37:48.000 --> 0:37:50.160
<v Speaker 1>And so I think that you know, this year, if

0:37:50.200 --> 0:37:52.680
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna have any if they're going to be successful,

0:37:53.120 --> 0:37:55.560
<v Speaker 1>it's going to be in a large part because he's

0:37:55.600 --> 0:37:58.400
<v Speaker 1>gonna step up and become that guy that in crunch

0:37:58.480 --> 0:38:00.520
<v Speaker 1>time and games, they're gonna find a way to get

0:38:00.560 --> 0:38:02.480
<v Speaker 1>him the ball. He's gonna make place for him. That's

0:38:02.480 --> 0:38:04.080
<v Speaker 1>how they're gonna win. I don't want to hear this

0:38:05.120 --> 0:38:08.640
<v Speaker 1>a MARII Cooper crap with this with this one next time,

0:38:08.680 --> 0:38:11.799
<v Speaker 1>because again we've brought this up before. Yeah, you talk

0:38:11.840 --> 0:38:14.319
<v Speaker 1>about like a Mari not getting involved or not being

0:38:14.360 --> 0:38:17.080
<v Speaker 1>able to find him. They didn't target CD until the

0:38:17.160 --> 0:38:20.080
<v Speaker 1>second half of the playoff loss. That's a problem. It

0:38:20.280 --> 0:38:23.200
<v Speaker 1>is a gigantic problem problem. That's what it makes me wonder, like,

0:38:23.680 --> 0:38:27.400
<v Speaker 1>makes me anxious to see what's going to happen exactly

0:38:27.480 --> 0:38:30.439
<v Speaker 1>next year, because although I don't think that Cilli Lamb

0:38:30.520 --> 0:38:34.480
<v Speaker 1>has reached his ceiling and he has a lot more

0:38:34.520 --> 0:38:36.759
<v Speaker 1>to show, I believe that. I think that right now,

0:38:36.920 --> 0:38:39.640
<v Speaker 1>the way that the team currently stands and what they

0:38:39.719 --> 0:38:43.839
<v Speaker 1>have talent wise, they've taken a step backwards and you're

0:38:43.880 --> 0:38:47.319
<v Speaker 1>not really having the right tools around players like him

0:38:47.440 --> 0:38:50.320
<v Speaker 1>for him to be able to succeed. And by that

0:38:50.480 --> 0:38:53.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean obviously the old line, what's going to happen there,

0:38:53.160 --> 0:38:57.960
<v Speaker 1>that's obviously going to affect the passing game and Celi Lamb. Yeah,

0:38:58.080 --> 0:39:00.400
<v Speaker 1>he's made some great catches and all, yeah, but I

0:39:00.480 --> 0:39:04.839
<v Speaker 1>also have a very fresh memory of drops that he's made,

0:39:04.920 --> 0:39:07.799
<v Speaker 1>things that he should have caught, things that you want

0:39:07.840 --> 0:39:10.640
<v Speaker 1>your number one guy to catch, and that's gonna be

0:39:10.800 --> 0:39:14.280
<v Speaker 1>his role now. And also the one game that Amari

0:39:14.360 --> 0:39:17.279
<v Speaker 1>Cooper didn't play and that you were counting on Ceedee lamb.

0:39:17.960 --> 0:39:20.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the coaching staff is going to have to

0:39:20.680 --> 0:39:24.239
<v Speaker 1>figure something out to make to allow him to play better.

0:39:24.400 --> 0:39:28.080
<v Speaker 1>But that one game right now doesn't give me a

0:39:28.120 --> 0:39:31.200
<v Speaker 1>lot of hope because he I don't remember him really

0:39:31.320 --> 0:39:35.479
<v Speaker 1>doing much of anything when Amari Cooper wasn't there to play.

0:39:35.560 --> 0:39:39.120
<v Speaker 1>So it makes me wonder, Okay, what's what's he actually

0:39:39.200 --> 0:39:41.040
<v Speaker 1>gonna do? And like I said, he has the talent

0:39:41.120 --> 0:39:45.080
<v Speaker 1>and I know he could. It's there, we just need

0:39:45.160 --> 0:39:47.799
<v Speaker 1>to see it. I mean he played it. To be fair,

0:39:47.920 --> 0:39:50.040
<v Speaker 1>he played a half against the Chiefs and got a

0:39:50.120 --> 0:39:52.680
<v Speaker 1>concussion and they didn't play the next game in a

0:39:52.719 --> 0:39:54.960
<v Speaker 1>short week. You know. While you were saying that, I

0:39:55.120 --> 0:39:58.759
<v Speaker 1>was like, man, that that game against the Raiders, you know,

0:39:58.880 --> 0:40:01.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean they were in it over time. I mean

0:40:01.160 --> 0:40:04.000
<v Speaker 1>the play playing that with both their starters, you know,

0:40:04.200 --> 0:40:09.280
<v Speaker 1>but like without both starting receivers. But when that happens,

0:40:09.280 --> 0:40:11.080
<v Speaker 1>like no one ever goes back and says, they just

0:40:11.200 --> 0:40:13.160
<v Speaker 1>they just lost to the Raiders, who aren't very good,

0:40:13.239 --> 0:40:15.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, or barely made the playoffs or whatever. But

0:40:15.440 --> 0:40:18.239
<v Speaker 1>it's just like that was a challenge, you know that.

0:40:18.360 --> 0:40:20.919
<v Speaker 1>I mean, obviously to play that game in a short

0:40:21.000 --> 0:40:23.200
<v Speaker 1>week without your true receivers. Yeah, you know. And also

0:40:23.320 --> 0:40:26.200
<v Speaker 1>I kind of think part of the problem with this offense,

0:40:26.520 --> 0:40:29.080
<v Speaker 1>I think they had too many options. I think Dak

0:40:29.160 --> 0:40:31.799
<v Speaker 1>had too many options. And they went into it saying, well,

0:40:31.800 --> 0:40:33.560
<v Speaker 1>we're just gonna find the open guy, just get it

0:40:33.600 --> 0:40:35.920
<v Speaker 1>to him, versus a lot of teams where they're like,

0:40:36.080 --> 0:40:38.799
<v Speaker 1>we got our guy, and he's good enough that even

0:40:38.840 --> 0:40:41.560
<v Speaker 1>if he's covered, even if he sometimes it is double covered,

0:40:41.800 --> 0:40:43.839
<v Speaker 1>he can make a play and we're gonna feed him

0:40:43.880 --> 0:40:46.600
<v Speaker 1>the rock. And I wonder if maybe that's the issue,

0:40:46.800 --> 0:40:48.960
<v Speaker 1>that that maybe, but and I get that, I know

0:40:49.000 --> 0:40:50.960
<v Speaker 1>they can be double aged sort because back when they

0:40:51.000 --> 0:40:53.080
<v Speaker 1>were doing that with Days, we were like, stop trying

0:40:53.160 --> 0:40:57.440
<v Speaker 1>to feed him the ball, just get the guy. It

0:40:57.520 --> 0:41:03.480
<v Speaker 1>goes both ways. This is my beef because I mean,

0:41:03.600 --> 0:41:06.840
<v Speaker 1>I I don't necessary I'm not having played in the NFL.

0:41:07.000 --> 0:41:09.520
<v Speaker 1>This is something that Isaiah Standback was on this show

0:41:09.560 --> 0:41:12.040
<v Speaker 1>and he said, he said, when that happens though, is

0:41:12.080 --> 0:41:14.759
<v Speaker 1>it your quarterback though? Is it your quarterback that says

0:41:14.880 --> 0:41:16.880
<v Speaker 1>you just said, regardless if you're covered, we feel like

0:41:16.960 --> 0:41:18.480
<v Speaker 1>we got a guy can make a play, But it

0:41:18.600 --> 0:41:21.680
<v Speaker 1>is the quarterback comfortable enough to make that throw? When

0:41:21.719 --> 0:41:23.520
<v Speaker 1>he's covered to go, I can still get it to

0:41:23.640 --> 0:41:25.840
<v Speaker 1>my guy, as opposed to no, no, no, I'll just

0:41:25.880 --> 0:41:28.319
<v Speaker 1>find Schultz boom seven yards. Well it's still it's still

0:41:28.480 --> 0:41:30.520
<v Speaker 1>now it's third and five. But you know, I got

0:41:31.000 --> 0:41:33.640
<v Speaker 1>that to me is about building confidence because he has

0:41:33.719 --> 0:41:36.040
<v Speaker 1>to build that confidence with that receiver. That means that

0:41:36.320 --> 0:41:39.319
<v Speaker 1>he has to do that a lot during training camp

0:41:39.400 --> 0:41:41.719
<v Speaker 1>and during practices they're having at the house and all.

0:41:41.800 --> 0:41:44.160
<v Speaker 1>That's a reason though, there's a reason why Dak doesn't

0:41:44.200 --> 0:41:46.440
<v Speaker 1>throw a lot of interceptions. I mean, seriously, is careful

0:41:46.480 --> 0:41:48.120
<v Speaker 1>because he's careful with the ball, which is not a

0:41:48.200 --> 0:41:50.920
<v Speaker 1>bad thing. That's a good thing. But you know, I

0:41:51.040 --> 0:41:53.160
<v Speaker 1>say it all the time. When he retired, I don't

0:41:53.160 --> 0:41:55.400
<v Speaker 1>think is anymore. But when he retired, Brett Farve led

0:41:55.440 --> 0:41:59.160
<v Speaker 1>the NFL and touchdowns and interceptions. Romo threw some picks too.

0:41:59.239 --> 0:42:01.080
<v Speaker 1>You gotta throw it takes some chance. But but do

0:42:01.200 --> 0:42:04.520
<v Speaker 1>you think do you think Lessening doesn't throw picks and

0:42:04.719 --> 0:42:06.600
<v Speaker 1>takes chances? So I don't know, but do you think

0:42:06.719 --> 0:42:11.319
<v Speaker 1>Lessening his options maybe having less uh, Like if he's

0:42:11.320 --> 0:42:14.279
<v Speaker 1>got to choose between throwing to a Noah Brown or

0:42:14.400 --> 0:42:16.800
<v Speaker 1>throwing to a CD, that might be covered. Do you

0:42:16.840 --> 0:42:18.719
<v Speaker 1>think in that kind of scenario, he's like, I got

0:42:18.800 --> 0:42:21.520
<v Speaker 1>a better chance of making this happen if I get

0:42:21.600 --> 0:42:23.759
<v Speaker 1>it to CD. Do you think that pushes him to

0:42:23.920 --> 0:42:26.560
<v Speaker 1>maybe try to make some of those throws it otherwise

0:42:26.640 --> 0:42:29.040
<v Speaker 1>he might pass on. I hate it a lot. No.

0:42:29.640 --> 0:42:33.239
<v Speaker 1>I know Aaron Rodgers is a one of one. Yeah,

0:42:33.760 --> 0:42:37.600
<v Speaker 1>but every other good quarterback has a multitude of weapons.

0:42:37.760 --> 0:42:39.880
<v Speaker 1>I think it's on Dak to just trust that he

0:42:39.960 --> 0:42:42.799
<v Speaker 1>can get guys the ball, Like look at look at

0:42:42.840 --> 0:42:45.040
<v Speaker 1>all these great teams. I mean, the Rams have more

0:42:45.120 --> 0:42:47.480
<v Speaker 1>than Cooper Cup. And when they lost Robert Woods, they

0:42:47.480 --> 0:42:49.799
<v Speaker 1>went and got Odell. They still feed the hell lot

0:42:49.840 --> 0:42:52.840
<v Speaker 1>of Cooper Cup. That's the quarterback. The quarterback is willing

0:42:52.920 --> 0:42:55.560
<v Speaker 1>to do that. And I'm a big Dak fan. It's

0:42:55.600 --> 0:42:58.680
<v Speaker 1>on Dak to have more confidence because I'm by the way,

0:42:58.719 --> 0:43:01.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm pointing to that hit on the head where Dak

0:43:01.239 --> 0:43:03.880
<v Speaker 1>is like, if you're not open as hell, I'm not

0:43:04.000 --> 0:43:06.879
<v Speaker 1>throwing you the ball. And that's great to a point,

0:43:07.080 --> 0:43:09.400
<v Speaker 1>you've also got to have the confidence to say this

0:43:09.640 --> 0:43:11.600
<v Speaker 1>is my guy, he's gonna go get Teams do that,

0:43:11.719 --> 0:43:15.399
<v Speaker 1>they're like, go ahead, chilts us all day long, because well,

0:43:15.760 --> 0:43:18.080
<v Speaker 1>we'll be all right in the end, which is why. Honestly,

0:43:18.280 --> 0:43:21.000
<v Speaker 1>when I look at them potentially drafting a receiver, the

0:43:21.160 --> 0:43:23.920
<v Speaker 1>name I keep going back to is Chris Olave because

0:43:24.000 --> 0:43:28.719
<v Speaker 1>he's a wonderful route runner. Run well he's got Yeah,

0:43:30.480 --> 0:43:33.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't I really, I don't care about his speed.

0:43:33.160 --> 0:43:35.600
<v Speaker 1>He I think he's the best route runner. If y'all

0:43:35.600 --> 0:43:37.840
<v Speaker 1>want speed, why aren't we talking about Jamison Williams. No,

0:43:37.880 --> 0:43:39.320
<v Speaker 1>I get it, but I'm saying A love gives you

0:43:39.400 --> 0:43:40.719
<v Speaker 1>both of them. He's a guy that can run, and

0:43:40.800 --> 0:43:42.600
<v Speaker 1>he can run great routes, So I'll take that speed

0:43:42.840 --> 0:43:46.520
<v Speaker 1>by training camp. Yeah, I already got that guy. A

0:43:47.480 --> 0:43:49.920
<v Speaker 1>Lave can create separation with his route running, which is

0:43:50.000 --> 0:43:51.279
<v Speaker 1>what DAK want. He's he going to be there at

0:43:51.280 --> 0:43:56.520
<v Speaker 1>twenty four? Maybe what I heard of it, But again,

0:43:56.600 --> 0:44:00.520
<v Speaker 1>I think terrible, terrible, terrible ideas they do to say,

0:44:00.840 --> 0:44:07.080
<v Speaker 1>sue they've only drafted miss, aren't this guy for it? No?

0:44:07.400 --> 0:44:09.880
<v Speaker 1>I think it's a terrible idea to say will be

0:44:10.080 --> 0:44:15.480
<v Speaker 1>better with less options, no chances, but not even same.

0:44:15.680 --> 0:44:18.480
<v Speaker 1>DAC needs help. It's gonna be the old line. I

0:44:18.680 --> 0:44:21.239
<v Speaker 1>tell you the guard or center that you can take

0:44:21.280 --> 0:44:23.799
<v Speaker 1>it twenty four that starts immediately, a plug and play

0:44:23.880 --> 0:44:26.879
<v Speaker 1>guy that helps DAC more than the receiver that they get.

0:44:26.920 --> 0:44:29.319
<v Speaker 1>A twenty four. I promise you that one that means

0:44:29.360 --> 0:44:31.320
<v Speaker 1>week one you might be out there with Noah Brown.

0:44:31.360 --> 0:44:33.000
<v Speaker 1>You're okay with that. Even if you got a good

0:44:33.000 --> 0:44:35.400
<v Speaker 1>offensive line, you're okay with that. No, I'm not okay

0:44:35.480 --> 0:44:39.600
<v Speaker 1>with that. Well, what are we doing? Like, there's there'll

0:44:39.640 --> 0:44:42.000
<v Speaker 1>be other guys too, There'll be there'll be other guys.

0:44:42.120 --> 0:44:44.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean, no, listen, I think we have hit the

0:44:44.600 --> 0:44:48.960
<v Speaker 1>point where I think, I mean, watch them sign someone today.

0:44:49.200 --> 0:44:51.279
<v Speaker 1>But I don't think you're gonna see a lot of

0:44:51.360 --> 0:44:54.279
<v Speaker 1>moves anymore. We're about three weeks away at this point.

0:44:54.400 --> 0:44:57.439
<v Speaker 1>Why go sign a veteran receiver? I don't know who's

0:44:57.440 --> 0:45:00.680
<v Speaker 1>out there, Jarvis Landry here? Yeah to me, why go

0:45:00.800 --> 0:45:03.439
<v Speaker 1>do that when you could draft the guy at twenty

0:45:03.480 --> 0:45:05.560
<v Speaker 1>four and then you're like, let's just cut you know? So,

0:45:05.640 --> 0:45:07.399
<v Speaker 1>I think you're just kind of hitting the brakes. We'll

0:45:07.400 --> 0:45:09.160
<v Speaker 1>see what happens after the draft, and then they'll be

0:45:09.280 --> 0:45:12.600
<v Speaker 1>they'll be like another wave. I think you're right, guys,

0:45:12.760 --> 0:45:14.600
<v Speaker 1>I think you're right. The thing like, I'm fine if

0:45:14.640 --> 0:45:16.759
<v Speaker 1>they don't do anything else at receiver. That's what James

0:45:16.840 --> 0:45:19.600
<v Speaker 1>Washington is for. You have to draft another one. But

0:45:20.120 --> 0:45:23.120
<v Speaker 1>you're like, okay, we have we're okay, and we can

0:45:23.200 --> 0:45:25.759
<v Speaker 1>draft a guy. The thing with guard is like, they're

0:45:25.800 --> 0:45:28.440
<v Speaker 1>not okay. They're not okay, and maybe they'll sign a

0:45:28.480 --> 0:45:31.000
<v Speaker 1>guy after the draft. But this is just my opinion.

0:45:31.239 --> 0:45:34.439
<v Speaker 1>I objectively think I think there's a very good chance

0:45:34.520 --> 0:45:37.399
<v Speaker 1>that a better If there's a receiver and a guard

0:45:37.440 --> 0:45:39.600
<v Speaker 1>both available at twenty four, I think the receiver will

0:45:39.600 --> 0:45:42.880
<v Speaker 1>be the better player. And I hate the idea that

0:45:42.920 --> 0:45:45.080
<v Speaker 1>they'll draft the guard just because they need it. Yeah,

0:45:45.200 --> 0:45:46.560
<v Speaker 1>so we're talking about it at the first end of

0:45:46.560 --> 0:45:49.719
<v Speaker 1>ours segment, right, Yeah, yeah, we'll see. I don't know,

0:45:49.880 --> 0:45:53.320
<v Speaker 1>but yeah, I mean it's entirely possible Burkes and do

0:45:53.480 --> 0:45:55.520
<v Speaker 1>Lava could be there, or at the very least one

0:45:55.600 --> 0:45:58.160
<v Speaker 1>of them. And going away from one of those guys

0:45:58.160 --> 0:46:00.640
<v Speaker 1>because you didn't do anything about guard makes me want

0:46:00.680 --> 0:46:04.440
<v Speaker 1>to puke. Yeah, but true. But also, remember what we

0:46:04.560 --> 0:46:06.759
<v Speaker 1>talked about before is that this is a three to

0:46:06.880 --> 0:46:09.480
<v Speaker 1>four year thing and you're gonna need a guard. I mean,

0:46:09.640 --> 0:46:12.000
<v Speaker 1>Zach Zach Martin is of course, no, I mean I

0:46:12.040 --> 0:46:14.719
<v Speaker 1>mean it's time to start putting those resources back in

0:46:14.800 --> 0:46:16.759
<v Speaker 1>that offensive line again. Well, but not only that, Nick,

0:46:16.800 --> 0:46:18.560
<v Speaker 1>you mentioned this earlier in the show. You kind are

0:46:18.600 --> 0:46:21.040
<v Speaker 1>also looking at like where can you get other players?

0:46:21.080 --> 0:46:22.920
<v Speaker 1>And it sounds like, Dave, you know more about this

0:46:23.000 --> 0:46:24.279
<v Speaker 1>than I do, But it sounds like this is a

0:46:24.440 --> 0:46:27.600
<v Speaker 1>very deep wide receiver draft. You could get good wide

0:46:27.640 --> 0:46:31.640
<v Speaker 1>receivers maybe in later round, second, third, maybe even fourth round.

0:46:31.719 --> 0:46:34.839
<v Speaker 1>Maybe they're not as good obviously, but certainly there are

0:46:34.880 --> 0:46:36.800
<v Speaker 1>options there where you're like you said, Nick, if you

0:46:36.800 --> 0:46:39.040
<v Speaker 1>don't take that center early, you might not get one.

0:46:39.400 --> 0:46:41.440
<v Speaker 1>Maybe the same for guard. Who knows. I think I

0:46:41.520 --> 0:46:43.600
<v Speaker 1>think you can get in the second or third round.

0:46:43.640 --> 0:46:45.440
<v Speaker 1>I think one of their needs is going to be

0:46:46.080 --> 0:46:50.319
<v Speaker 1>a smaller receiver, very quick and fast. Maybe a guy

0:46:50.360 --> 0:46:52.879
<v Speaker 1>that returns punts as well. I don't even know the name.

0:46:53.480 --> 0:46:55.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure you've got some names like that, but I'm

0:46:55.560 --> 0:47:00.320
<v Speaker 1>looking at a you know, five ten, five eleven, you know,

0:47:00.920 --> 0:47:03.400
<v Speaker 1>slot guy, super quick and fast, he can do some

0:47:03.560 --> 0:47:06.920
<v Speaker 1>things with him, returns punts. That would be because I

0:47:07.000 --> 0:47:09.840
<v Speaker 1>think that guy in the third round is also a

0:47:09.880 --> 0:47:12.480
<v Speaker 1>guy that helps you immediately, because there's not really a

0:47:12.560 --> 0:47:15.360
<v Speaker 1>guy like that James Washington is not very tall, but

0:47:15.480 --> 0:47:17.640
<v Speaker 1>he's not really a slot guy. I'm looking for it.

0:47:17.800 --> 0:47:21.520
<v Speaker 1>Maybe a slot type of quick, you know, gadget type

0:47:21.560 --> 0:47:24.680
<v Speaker 1>player that can do some things for me. Larry, let

0:47:24.760 --> 0:47:27.239
<v Speaker 1>me look at this draft magazine there we have. We're

0:47:27.239 --> 0:47:28.879
<v Speaker 1>gonna take our final break. When we come back, we're

0:47:28.920 --> 0:47:30.359
<v Speaker 1>gonna talk a little bit more and we're gonna move

0:47:30.360 --> 0:47:32.239
<v Speaker 1>to the second round. And look what the Cowboys have

0:47:32.360 --> 0:47:34.560
<v Speaker 1>done in the second round over the last five years.

0:47:34.800 --> 0:47:36.600
<v Speaker 1>Wha come right back done. This is Dallas Cowboys dot

0:47:36.640 --> 0:47:41.839
<v Speaker 1>Com Radio. Hi, I'm Clint Tillison with man, I'm Jay Novachek,

0:47:42.000 --> 0:47:46.840
<v Speaker 1>and we're both with the official tractor provider of the

0:47:47.040 --> 0:47:49.919
<v Speaker 1>Dallas Cowboys. So if you need a tractor to bail

0:47:50.000 --> 0:47:52.160
<v Speaker 1>some hay, I'm more to cut some grass or a

0:47:52.280 --> 0:47:54.879
<v Speaker 1>gator to get some chores done, get a John Dere

0:47:55.120 --> 0:47:58.600
<v Speaker 1>at United agin Turf and then let's get to work.

0:47:58.680 --> 0:48:01.840
<v Speaker 1>Hey Jay, that's my line, Well not today, get to

0:48:01.960 --> 0:48:04.560
<v Speaker 1>work with a John Duer tractor package that's just right

0:48:04.680 --> 0:48:09.200
<v Speaker 1>for you and your budget. Visit unanataginturf dot Com. The

0:48:09.360 --> 0:48:13.600
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys Way, where sixteen Hall of Famers and five championships

0:48:13.640 --> 0:48:17.000
<v Speaker 1>shows us what success looks like. Where Turkey is always

0:48:17.080 --> 0:48:20.000
<v Speaker 1>the second best part of Thanksgiving Day, where we are

0:48:20.080 --> 0:48:24.160
<v Speaker 1>all defined by one single thing, the star, where we

0:48:24.360 --> 0:48:27.120
<v Speaker 1>as fans know it's our job to keep the tradition going.

0:48:27.800 --> 0:48:30.040
<v Speaker 1>Bank of America is proud to be the official bank

0:48:30.080 --> 0:48:32.600
<v Speaker 1>of the Dallas Cowboys and to support the quest of

0:48:32.680 --> 0:48:36.400
<v Speaker 1>living life the Cowboys Way. Copyright twenty twenty Bank of

0:48:36.440 --> 0:48:40.600
<v Speaker 1>America Corporation. At ATNC, everyone new and existing customers get

0:48:40.640 --> 0:48:43.880
<v Speaker 1>our best deals on every smartphone. Why because you deserve it.

0:48:44.120 --> 0:48:46.399
<v Speaker 1>We're turning your living room into your office and your gym.

0:48:47.560 --> 0:48:50.600
<v Speaker 1>We're teaching Grandma had a video call and teaching her again.

0:48:50.800 --> 0:48:53.360
<v Speaker 1>It's the button on your left Nana, Okay, your other laughs.

0:48:54.480 --> 0:48:57.880
<v Speaker 1>It's not complicated. Everyone deserves something new, So ATNC is

0:48:57.920 --> 0:49:00.560
<v Speaker 1>given everyone new and existing customers are best deals with

0:49:00.680 --> 0:49:03.560
<v Speaker 1>every unlimited plan on every smartphone, even the latest ones.

0:49:03.600 --> 0:49:05.239
<v Speaker 1>AT and T may temper Ali Slo date Speace at

0:49:05.239 --> 0:49:08.880
<v Speaker 1>the network. Specific restrictions and exceptions may apply. New Doctor

0:49:08.920 --> 0:49:12.400
<v Speaker 1>Peppers zero sugar. You deserve it. I do deserve that.

0:49:13.120 --> 0:49:16.560
<v Speaker 1>You deserve decadent flavor without sugar and a day at

0:49:16.600 --> 0:49:21.200
<v Speaker 1>the beach without sam getting everywhere, and a relaxing bath

0:49:21.239 --> 0:49:24.400
<v Speaker 1>that your children don't interrupt. I deserve all that. It's

0:49:24.520 --> 0:49:27.480
<v Speaker 1>really just a visual metaphor for doctor Pepper zero sugar.

0:49:27.680 --> 0:49:31.080
<v Speaker 1>Everything you want, nothing you don't, a visual metaphor on

0:49:31.160 --> 0:49:34.080
<v Speaker 1>the radio. I do deserve that, Doctor Pepper, zero sugar.

0:49:34.360 --> 0:49:39.760
<v Speaker 1>The zero you deserve is finally here. Back to the break.

0:49:42.480 --> 0:49:45.960
<v Speaker 1>Registration is now open for Dallas Cowboys Youth Football Dance

0:49:46.000 --> 0:49:49.279
<v Speaker 1>Academy and Little Miss camps. Save twenty five dollars with

0:49:49.360 --> 0:49:51.799
<v Speaker 1>early bird pricing when you registered by May ninth. Camps

0:49:51.840 --> 0:49:54.040
<v Speaker 1>are available at ATENC Stadium in Ford Center, at the

0:49:54.080 --> 0:49:56.600
<v Speaker 1>Start in Frisco, is at Dallas Cowery dot com Slash Academy.

0:49:56.600 --> 0:49:59.120
<v Speaker 1>To secure your spot today, let's go Welcome back to

0:49:59.200 --> 0:50:02.040
<v Speaker 1>the final segments. Brake left Nest WBC Mortgage Studios at

0:50:02.080 --> 0:50:04.480
<v Speaker 1>the Start. I did not get a chance to let

0:50:05.040 --> 0:50:08.080
<v Speaker 1>you guys tell me what you thought. A WWE guy's

0:50:08.120 --> 0:50:10.320
<v Speaker 1>got a chance to go out there and experience WW

0:50:10.560 --> 0:50:17.480
<v Speaker 1>what was that like? Wonderful? Yeah? I mean it's uh, Dave,

0:50:17.680 --> 0:50:21.640
<v Speaker 1>Dave was he was really excited when a Stone Cold

0:50:21.719 --> 0:50:24.160
<v Speaker 1>came out. Yeah, I was. I was trying to find

0:50:24.239 --> 0:50:26.480
<v Speaker 1>the words to say. It's just it's one of those

0:50:26.560 --> 0:50:28.719
<v Speaker 1>things that just takes you back to your childhood, you know,

0:50:28.840 --> 0:50:30.880
<v Speaker 1>like if you hear a song from when you were

0:50:31.239 --> 0:50:35.160
<v Speaker 1>a Stalgia. Yeah, very nostalgia. Which the fact that Stone

0:50:35.200 --> 0:50:37.920
<v Speaker 1>Cold is I've been to three WrestleManias now and he's

0:50:37.960 --> 0:50:40.640
<v Speaker 1>made an appearance at all of them. Like, wwe knows

0:50:40.680 --> 0:50:44.400
<v Speaker 1>what it's fans want. They're like, hit me with the nostalgia. Okay,

0:50:44.719 --> 0:50:47.839
<v Speaker 1>they never promised that. I never I made them. Look

0:50:48.200 --> 0:50:52.520
<v Speaker 1>I made that. I ruined everybody's night. Because my buddy

0:50:53.640 --> 0:50:57.040
<v Speaker 1>is like really into wrestling, like he follows it closely.

0:50:57.200 --> 0:51:00.600
<v Speaker 1>He reads the message boards, he watches and xt in

0:51:00.680 --> 0:51:03.400
<v Speaker 1>the Japanese leagues, and he was like, yeah, you know

0:51:03.760 --> 0:51:05.960
<v Speaker 1>the rumor there's a chance the Rock could show up,

0:51:06.239 --> 0:51:08.240
<v Speaker 1>And I said it in passing to a few people

0:51:08.600 --> 0:51:11.160
<v Speaker 1>like Nick. But they brought their kids and like one

0:51:11.239 --> 0:51:12.800
<v Speaker 1>of their kids to have a great night, and so

0:51:13.000 --> 0:51:14.959
<v Speaker 1>like by halfway through the show, everybody was like, when's

0:51:15.000 --> 0:51:17.439
<v Speaker 1>the Rock get And I was like, I didn't say

0:51:17.480 --> 0:51:19.879
<v Speaker 1>it was gonna happen. You weren't the only one, though,

0:51:20.000 --> 0:51:22.000
<v Speaker 1>you weren't the only one. We went We went in

0:51:22.080 --> 0:51:24.120
<v Speaker 1>there thinking that there was a good chance for the rock,

0:51:24.800 --> 0:51:27.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, but a little man wasn't excited that and

0:51:27.120 --> 0:51:29.239
<v Speaker 1>he wasn't happy that Rock didn't show it rock. But

0:51:29.320 --> 0:51:30.879
<v Speaker 1>you know, part of it too is that's all that's

0:51:30.880 --> 0:51:33.640
<v Speaker 1>who he hes. He knows it doesn't know, but now

0:51:33.719 --> 0:51:35.640
<v Speaker 1>he knows. Now he knows Roman Rains, he knows some

0:51:35.840 --> 0:51:38.320
<v Speaker 1>some other people. And you know, he was kind of

0:51:38.520 --> 0:51:39.960
<v Speaker 1>he was kind of into it. I thought it was

0:51:40.040 --> 0:51:41.560
<v Speaker 1>it was cool that they put on a great show.

0:51:41.600 --> 0:51:43.560
<v Speaker 1>And there's no doubt about it. They do a great job.

0:51:43.640 --> 0:51:47.040
<v Speaker 1>That know what they're doing, and it was it was fun. Yeah.

0:51:47.120 --> 0:51:49.920
<v Speaker 1>Speaking of nostalgia, Dave, you kind of you kind of

0:51:50.160 --> 0:51:54.080
<v Speaker 1>took me aback when you tweeted about One Shining Moment

0:51:54.120 --> 0:51:56.800
<v Speaker 1>because I was like, oh, that is all about nostalgia.

0:51:56.840 --> 0:51:59.719
<v Speaker 1>How could you not like One Shining Moment? You know me, man,

0:52:00.000 --> 0:52:04.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm broken inside. I just I just it's probably hurt me.

0:52:04.239 --> 0:52:05.879
<v Speaker 1>Like I was like, I love One Shining I looked

0:52:05.920 --> 0:52:07.520
<v Speaker 1>forward to One Shining Moment. I just think it's a

0:52:07.600 --> 0:52:11.040
<v Speaker 1>corny song, yes, but that's beside the point. It's nostalgia.

0:52:11.640 --> 0:52:14.800
<v Speaker 1>It's nostalgia. It's it's just all the years of watching

0:52:14.840 --> 0:52:17.000
<v Speaker 1>it after I thought you were actually referring to like

0:52:17.239 --> 0:52:20.880
<v Speaker 1>a shiny moment that happened. We're talking about the you know,

0:52:20.960 --> 0:52:22.920
<v Speaker 1>obviously the video they put together at the end of

0:52:22.960 --> 0:52:26.600
<v Speaker 1>the Come into it now and just hit and just

0:52:26.920 --> 0:52:28.480
<v Speaker 1>let me see what they're talking about. Yeah, like, you

0:52:28.560 --> 0:52:30.480
<v Speaker 1>gotta have been doing this for years, and it's just

0:52:30.640 --> 0:52:33.160
<v Speaker 1>a part of the experience, part of the experience of

0:52:33.320 --> 0:52:35.759
<v Speaker 1>March madness. Been watching the tournaments since I was like

0:52:36.000 --> 0:52:39.560
<v Speaker 1>eight years old. My dad grew up a huge KU fan.

0:52:39.760 --> 0:52:42.440
<v Speaker 1>I don't follow KU basketball anymore, but it was very

0:52:42.640 --> 0:52:45.200
<v Speaker 1>cool to see them when they broke my heart in

0:52:45.239 --> 0:52:47.000
<v Speaker 1>the Dome in two thousand and three when they lost

0:52:47.040 --> 0:52:49.120
<v Speaker 1>the Syracuse so like I was like, oh, kind of

0:52:49.200 --> 0:52:52.080
<v Speaker 1>exercising those demons. I still turned it off before the

0:52:52.120 --> 0:52:54.200
<v Speaker 1>song came on, like I did too, But it doesn't

0:52:54.200 --> 0:52:57.400
<v Speaker 1>do anything for me. Did YouTube the next time I did?

0:52:58.120 --> 0:53:00.480
<v Speaker 1>I did too. See that's it's it's to me thing.

0:53:00.680 --> 0:53:05.960
<v Speaker 1>It's like displays of earnest emotion abhorre me, Like I

0:53:06.080 --> 0:53:08.160
<v Speaker 1>can't deal with this, so I have to go somewhere else.

0:53:08.239 --> 0:53:11.719
<v Speaker 1>It's really hard to do anything like, especially in the

0:53:11.840 --> 0:53:15.520
<v Speaker 1>media world, to keep it going for I mean, thirty

0:53:15.680 --> 0:53:18.120
<v Speaker 1>thirty two years. I believe it was nineteen ninety or

0:53:18.200 --> 0:53:20.600
<v Speaker 1>ninety one when they started doing it. They've changed the song.

0:53:20.719 --> 0:53:23.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean it's a different version of that song version,

0:53:23.400 --> 0:53:26.640
<v Speaker 1>but it's still the ball is tipped. Yeah, I've always

0:53:26.680 --> 0:53:28.680
<v Speaker 1>just loved it. It's just it's kind of just pulls

0:53:28.680 --> 0:53:30.680
<v Speaker 1>it all back together. Remind you. I remember that in

0:53:30.680 --> 0:53:32.200
<v Speaker 1>the first round. I remember that in the second round.

0:53:32.280 --> 0:53:34.600
<v Speaker 1>Like it's just I don't know, like as you get older,

0:53:34.840 --> 0:53:37.440
<v Speaker 1>like Santa Claus Is coming to town is not for

0:53:37.560 --> 0:53:39.520
<v Speaker 1>me either. It's a little too hokey. But you just

0:53:39.600 --> 0:53:41.840
<v Speaker 1>talked about WWE and you were like, it's all about

0:53:41.840 --> 0:53:45.360
<v Speaker 1>in the stat Yeah, Stone Cold comes out on an ATV,

0:53:45.640 --> 0:53:49.120
<v Speaker 1>guzzles beer and kicks people's ass. Like that's fun, that's great,

0:53:49.719 --> 0:53:52.080
<v Speaker 1>one shining moment. You just told us so much about yourself,

0:53:52.640 --> 0:53:55.840
<v Speaker 1>stone Cold in the Rock, Like those are my childhood heroes.

0:53:55.920 --> 0:53:58.439
<v Speaker 1>If you need any contexts about who I am. Yeah, yeah,

0:53:58.600 --> 0:54:00.520
<v Speaker 1>that's good. Okay, all right, let's move on. We're gonna

0:54:00.520 --> 0:54:02.760
<v Speaker 1>talk about the second round here, and we'll probably haven't

0:54:02.800 --> 0:54:04.200
<v Speaker 1>get through all of this, but we're gonna start here

0:54:04.200 --> 0:54:06.959
<v Speaker 1>on the second round. Next week, we'll pick you back up. First,

0:54:07.040 --> 0:54:10.839
<v Speaker 1>tell me in the second round, what is the expectation Dave,

0:54:10.920 --> 0:54:12.239
<v Speaker 1>I know you said you kind of know how teams

0:54:12.320 --> 0:54:15.920
<v Speaker 1>think about this. What what do teams think of second

0:54:16.080 --> 0:54:18.680
<v Speaker 1>you have something the second round picks, and what the

0:54:18.760 --> 0:54:21.279
<v Speaker 1>expectation should be for those players. I think, more so

0:54:21.520 --> 0:54:24.360
<v Speaker 1>than what Dave said in about the first round, I

0:54:24.480 --> 0:54:26.759
<v Speaker 1>think where the guys picked in the second round is

0:54:27.040 --> 0:54:30.640
<v Speaker 1>a big difference. I mean high second round. You know

0:54:30.800 --> 0:54:34.600
<v Speaker 1>you're talking about thirty eight, thirty nine, forty versus sixty.

0:54:35.440 --> 0:54:37.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean I think I think that's a big difference

0:54:37.280 --> 0:54:40.279
<v Speaker 1>on your expectation. I mean, first round you expect that

0:54:40.360 --> 0:54:42.960
<v Speaker 1>guy to come in and play. Second round depending on

0:54:43.080 --> 0:54:45.640
<v Speaker 1>the position it is different, I mean, and what you

0:54:45.640 --> 0:54:48.800
<v Speaker 1>expect him to at least contribute. Yeah, first, So the

0:54:49.120 --> 0:54:51.200
<v Speaker 1>two things I'm looking at here, which is the way

0:54:51.239 --> 0:54:53.080
<v Speaker 1>you look at it depending on and next totally right

0:54:53.160 --> 0:54:55.520
<v Speaker 1>like second round, high, second round, low, second round, even

0:54:55.600 --> 0:54:59.640
<v Speaker 1>part of the third round. First year, starter, ability, verse starter,

0:54:59.719 --> 0:55:03.600
<v Speaker 1>a bil, immediate backup or role player might need time

0:55:03.600 --> 0:55:06.360
<v Speaker 1>to develop. The higher you go, the more likely it

0:55:06.560 --> 0:55:08.960
<v Speaker 1>is that you view them as an immediate starter or

0:55:09.000 --> 0:55:11.759
<v Speaker 1>an immediate player. And that's why the funny thing is,

0:55:12.840 --> 0:55:14.399
<v Speaker 1>and I know you want to go round by round,

0:55:14.440 --> 0:55:17.760
<v Speaker 1>but I think this is a just a perfect example

0:55:17.800 --> 0:55:21.000
<v Speaker 1>of what we're talking about. And it's why teams guard

0:55:21.160 --> 0:55:25.759
<v Speaker 1>their actual grades of players very very closely because they

0:55:25.800 --> 0:55:28.120
<v Speaker 1>don't want to They don't want you to know just

0:55:28.360 --> 0:55:31.120
<v Speaker 1>how little or much they thought of a guy, because

0:55:31.200 --> 0:55:34.320
<v Speaker 1>that can really come back to bite you. But twenty

0:55:34.680 --> 0:55:38.319
<v Speaker 1>nineteen and twenty eighteen, or perfect example, Connor Williams goes

0:55:38.440 --> 0:55:43.120
<v Speaker 1>fiftieth overall mid second round. Then the next year they

0:55:43.200 --> 0:55:46.480
<v Speaker 1>don't really need a guard, but they draft Connor McGovern

0:55:46.640 --> 0:55:53.800
<v Speaker 1>I believe ninetieth, yes, ninetieth overall. And remember the narrative

0:55:53.800 --> 0:55:56.279
<v Speaker 1>around McGovern when they drafted him was this was a

0:55:56.440 --> 0:55:59.359
<v Speaker 1>blinking red light, like we had a high second round

0:55:59.400 --> 0:56:01.960
<v Speaker 1>grade on this guy. We couldn't believe he hung around

0:56:02.080 --> 0:56:04.719
<v Speaker 1>until where we were picking in the third round. So

0:56:05.200 --> 0:56:08.719
<v Speaker 1>even though Connor McGovern was taker, sorry, Connor Williams was

0:56:08.800 --> 0:56:12.960
<v Speaker 1>taking forty spots ahead of Connor McGovern, Connor McGovern's a

0:56:13.040 --> 0:56:15.880
<v Speaker 1>more disappointing player to me because of what you had

0:56:15.960 --> 0:56:17.800
<v Speaker 1>him great at, as what you thought he could be,

0:56:18.239 --> 0:56:21.200
<v Speaker 1>whereas Connor Williams, and to be fair to him. I

0:56:21.239 --> 0:56:23.480
<v Speaker 1>don't know what they're great on Connor was, but taking

0:56:23.520 --> 0:56:26.040
<v Speaker 1>it taking at fiftieth. I've been arguing with people for

0:56:26.160 --> 0:56:29.960
<v Speaker 1>months that Connor Williams is this disappointing player. I'm like,

0:56:30.200 --> 0:56:32.920
<v Speaker 1>you drafted him fiftieth overall and he started four years here,

0:56:33.120 --> 0:56:35.080
<v Speaker 1>didn't work out. You were fine to let him leave,

0:56:35.160 --> 0:56:37.040
<v Speaker 1>but like you got a second contract in the NFL,

0:56:37.120 --> 0:56:39.600
<v Speaker 1>that's you got used out of him. Like that is

0:56:39.640 --> 0:56:42.360
<v Speaker 1>not a terrible pick as far as I'm concerned. Whereas

0:56:43.440 --> 0:56:45.360
<v Speaker 1>for what we know about what they thought of Connor

0:56:45.440 --> 0:56:47.600
<v Speaker 1>McGovern and I'm like, y'all thought you were getting more

0:56:47.640 --> 0:56:49.520
<v Speaker 1>than this when you drafted him. I mean, that's just

0:56:49.640 --> 0:56:52.719
<v Speaker 1>that's indisputable at this point. So I think it's just

0:56:52.840 --> 0:56:55.719
<v Speaker 1>an interesting inside look into the way that these things

0:56:55.840 --> 0:56:59.080
<v Speaker 1>play out, because again, you could draft a guy at

0:56:59.160 --> 0:57:01.520
<v Speaker 1>ninety that you have a high second on, or draft

0:57:01.600 --> 0:57:03.800
<v Speaker 1>a guy at fifty who you're like, oh, this is

0:57:03.800 --> 0:57:06.880
<v Speaker 1>about right, you know where this is? This lines up

0:57:06.880 --> 0:57:10.000
<v Speaker 1>with where we're picking, And I think that just colors

0:57:10.040 --> 0:57:12.120
<v Speaker 1>the way that you can view these careers because I think,

0:57:13.200 --> 0:57:16.280
<v Speaker 1>of course, you would rather have Treyvon Diggs, who was

0:57:16.360 --> 0:57:19.600
<v Speaker 1>fifty first overall, like it would be great if a

0:57:19.680 --> 0:57:21.880
<v Speaker 1>top fifty pick signed a second contract here, but I

0:57:21.920 --> 0:57:23.320
<v Speaker 1>don't think it's the end of the world that it

0:57:23.400 --> 0:57:26.000
<v Speaker 1>doesn't work out. So you look at the guys that

0:57:26.040 --> 0:57:28.320
<v Speaker 1>they've selected over the last five years. In the second round,

0:57:28.360 --> 0:57:31.320
<v Speaker 1>you got Kelvin JOSEPHO was selected at forty four, Treyvon

0:57:31.400 --> 0:57:34.520
<v Speaker 1>Diggs at fifty one, Tristan Hill at fifty eight, Connor

0:57:34.560 --> 0:57:37.880
<v Speaker 1>Williams at fifty, and Cheetah bay A Woozier at sixty.

0:57:39.080 --> 0:57:42.040
<v Speaker 1>Let's start first with Kelvin Joseph. Do you think he's

0:57:42.880 --> 0:57:45.320
<v Speaker 1>met expectations for what you needed to see from him

0:57:45.360 --> 0:57:47.520
<v Speaker 1>in year one or do you think at this point

0:57:47.560 --> 0:57:50.600
<v Speaker 1>he's vastly under under that I don't think we'd say over,

0:57:50.720 --> 0:57:52.720
<v Speaker 1>but vastly under where you wanted him to be at

0:57:52.760 --> 0:57:54.920
<v Speaker 1>the end of year one. I mean, I think when

0:57:54.960 --> 0:57:58.000
<v Speaker 1>he was drafted, even though you kind of knew some

0:57:58.120 --> 0:58:02.880
<v Speaker 1>of his history, the corner that you draft at forty four,

0:58:03.400 --> 0:58:06.480
<v Speaker 1>you would have liked for him to be better than

0:58:06.520 --> 0:58:10.760
<v Speaker 1>Anthony Brown. He wasn't for a couple of reasons. One,

0:58:10.880 --> 0:58:13.400
<v Speaker 1>he wasn't good enough, he has hurt a little bit,

0:58:13.960 --> 0:58:18.320
<v Speaker 1>and Anthony Brown had a better year than maybe people

0:58:18.360 --> 0:58:20.720
<v Speaker 1>thought he was gonna have. You know, he's continued to

0:58:20.800 --> 0:58:24.960
<v Speaker 1>improve too, so I think he's below the expectations. But

0:58:25.360 --> 0:58:27.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, the cornerbacks that were ahead of them are

0:58:27.320 --> 0:58:29.400
<v Speaker 1>better than him, and you got to give them credit

0:58:29.480 --> 0:58:31.400
<v Speaker 1>for that. Yeah, I think the way you view Kelvin

0:58:31.560 --> 0:58:34.600
<v Speaker 1>probably depends on how you viewed Jordan Lewis and Anthony Brown,

0:58:34.880 --> 0:58:38.280
<v Speaker 1>because on one hand, it's like these guys are bums

0:58:38.360 --> 0:58:40.160
<v Speaker 1>who were trying to get rid of and a top

0:58:40.240 --> 0:58:41.720
<v Speaker 1>fifty picks should be able to come in and take

0:58:41.800 --> 0:58:44.680
<v Speaker 1>their job. Then on the other hand, you say, these

0:58:44.760 --> 0:58:48.280
<v Speaker 1>two guys are successful draft picks who signed second contracts

0:58:48.320 --> 0:58:50.080
<v Speaker 1>with their team and have started a lot of games

0:58:50.120 --> 0:58:52.880
<v Speaker 1>in the NFL. Maybe neither one of them is as

0:58:52.960 --> 0:58:54.720
<v Speaker 1>bad as fans like to act like they are. And

0:58:54.840 --> 0:58:58.480
<v Speaker 1>it's hard for a rookie, a rookie whose thumbnail was

0:58:59.000 --> 0:59:02.000
<v Speaker 1>kind of raw only. I think Kelvin Joseph only started

0:59:02.040 --> 0:59:04.640
<v Speaker 1>like eight college games, hasn't played a lot of football,

0:59:04.880 --> 0:59:06.920
<v Speaker 1>probably not ready to come in and be the guy

0:59:07.120 --> 0:59:09.120
<v Speaker 1>right away. But I do like what I see from

0:59:09.200 --> 0:59:11.919
<v Speaker 1>him from when when he's out there, you can see

0:59:12.160 --> 0:59:16.880
<v Speaker 1>the skills and I think you know, I've said it before,

0:59:17.480 --> 0:59:20.880
<v Speaker 1>this these three months are crucial for him. These you know,

0:59:21.840 --> 0:59:25.640
<v Speaker 1>March April May. What is he doing to take his

0:59:25.760 --> 0:59:27.960
<v Speaker 1>game to the next level, because he's got the potential,

0:59:28.000 --> 0:59:30.080
<v Speaker 1>he's just got to do it. Maybe it's a cop out,

0:59:30.760 --> 0:59:33.880
<v Speaker 1>but like Kelvin Joseph, I just have a pen in

0:59:34.400 --> 0:59:37.600
<v Speaker 1>him where I'm like, I'm not disappointed and I'm not optimistic,

0:59:37.960 --> 0:59:40.280
<v Speaker 1>just like it was a red shirt ear for all

0:59:40.320 --> 0:59:44.000
<v Speaker 1>intents and purposes, Let's see what you can do this year. Yeah, well,

0:59:44.120 --> 0:59:46.080
<v Speaker 1>that's a rap for us for today. We'll be back

0:59:46.160 --> 0:59:48.120
<v Speaker 1>next week. We'll talk about the rest of this second

0:59:48.200 --> 0:59:51.080
<v Speaker 1>round because there are lots of questions around Treylon Diggs

0:59:51.120 --> 0:59:54.240
<v Speaker 1>and how he's can, how he's perceived versus the player

0:59:54.320 --> 0:59:57.440
<v Speaker 1>that he is, and and certainly from Connor Williams Tristan Hill,

0:59:57.640 --> 1:00:00.040
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of questions in this second round. We

1:00:00.120 --> 1:00:01.320
<v Speaker 1>talk about it all that next week till then. For

1:00:01.440 --> 1:00:03.600
<v Speaker 1>Nick Even, Dave helm and Amber Garcia. I am Derek Eagleton.

1:00:03.680 --> 1:00:06.160
<v Speaker 1>This has been The Break live on Dallas Cowboys dot

1:00:06.200 --> 1:00:10.720
<v Speaker 1>Com Radio. This has been a production of Dallas Cowboys

1:00:10.800 --> 1:00:13.439
<v Speaker 1>dot Com and the Dallas Cowboys Football club