WEBVTT - Week 17 NFL Best Bets (Ep. 146)

0:00:13.720 --> 0:00:17.320
<v Speaker 1>Hey everybody, Welcome back to the Betting Pros Podcast, brought

0:00:17.360 --> 0:00:20.240
<v Speaker 1>to you by bet MGM. I am your host, Dan Harris.

0:00:20.280 --> 0:00:22.080
<v Speaker 1>You can find me on Twitter at Dan Harris eighty.

0:00:22.120 --> 0:00:24.759
<v Speaker 1>It's week seventeen. It's time to talk about some of

0:00:24.800 --> 0:00:28.080
<v Speaker 1>our best bets. With me to do that is Scott Bogman.

0:00:28.360 --> 0:00:31.200
<v Speaker 1>He's the co host of In This League podcast. You

0:00:31.240 --> 0:00:33.600
<v Speaker 1>know him from the Betting Pros College Football Show and

0:00:33.680 --> 0:00:38.040
<v Speaker 1>pretty much from everywhere. Find him on Twitter at Bogman Sports. Bogwin.

0:00:38.120 --> 0:00:40.520
<v Speaker 1>Thank you for taking time out of your busy day

0:00:40.960 --> 0:00:42.360
<v Speaker 1>to pop on this pod. How are you.

0:00:42.760 --> 0:00:44.760
<v Speaker 2>I'm doing great, man, Thank you for having me. I

0:00:44.800 --> 0:00:49.040
<v Speaker 2>love talking to anything NFL always so yeah show.

0:00:49.120 --> 0:00:51.280
<v Speaker 1>And we like talking to each other anyway, just because

0:00:51.560 --> 0:00:53.840
<v Speaker 1>you know we've been on each other's podcast. It's good time.

0:00:53.880 --> 0:00:56.760
<v Speaker 1>It's always fun. So long as we pick WINNERDS Bogman,

0:00:56.800 --> 0:00:58.840
<v Speaker 1>that's all anybody cares about. Trust me. I can tell

0:00:58.880 --> 0:01:01.440
<v Speaker 1>from the comments Center Tube channel, so don't worry about it.

0:01:01.600 --> 0:01:04.320
<v Speaker 3>I know from some of the emails I've got all right.

0:01:04.800 --> 0:01:07.399
<v Speaker 1>So look usually, by the way, you guys have noticed

0:01:07.480 --> 0:01:09.160
<v Speaker 1>the last two weeks, we have not done the look

0:01:09.200 --> 0:01:12.319
<v Speaker 1>Ahead podcast like the early one just to take an

0:01:12.319 --> 0:01:14.240
<v Speaker 1>early look at the lines. One of it was because

0:01:14.280 --> 0:01:16.280
<v Speaker 1>it was just Christmas and getting people's hard. But right

0:01:16.319 --> 0:01:19.160
<v Speaker 1>now with the COVID situation, man, like, is one.

0:01:19.120 --> 0:01:23.960
<v Speaker 2>Hundred guys came off the COVID list today? Yeah, because it's.

0:01:22.760 --> 0:01:25.080
<v Speaker 1>Getting a little easier obviously because of the fact that

0:01:25.120 --> 0:01:27.840
<v Speaker 1>they change the protocol now, so like guys being put on.

0:01:28.200 --> 0:01:30.399
<v Speaker 1>But now at this point, Bagman, I think if people

0:01:30.400 --> 0:01:32.920
<v Speaker 1>get put on the list, they're out because you still

0:01:32.920 --> 0:01:35.559
<v Speaker 1>need the five days, so this may still change things.

0:01:35.560 --> 0:01:37.039
<v Speaker 1>We'll do the best we can, wait as long as

0:01:37.080 --> 0:01:40.160
<v Speaker 1>possible to make your bets as full. Yes, my general recommendation.

0:01:40.200 --> 0:01:42.200
<v Speaker 1>All right, usual deal, three best bets of the weekend

0:01:42.240 --> 0:01:44.560
<v Speaker 1>spreads totals, money line, whatever you want to do. Then

0:01:44.560 --> 0:01:48.080
<v Speaker 1>we'll run through the remaining spreads. Don't forget to subscribe

0:01:48.080 --> 0:01:50.000
<v Speaker 1>to our YouTube channel. You can be watching this podcast

0:01:50.240 --> 0:01:52.800
<v Speaker 1>over at YouTube dot com slash betting Pros. Then go

0:01:52.800 --> 0:01:55.080
<v Speaker 1>to betting Pros dot com slash helmet. Very quickly you

0:01:55.080 --> 0:01:58.040
<v Speaker 1>can win a sign Saquon Barkley helmet and our latest

0:01:58.040 --> 0:02:01.320
<v Speaker 1>offer from bet MGM new customers ten dollars two hundred dollars.

0:02:01.400 --> 0:02:04.680
<v Speaker 1>If your team scores a touchdown again. That's for new customers.

0:02:04.760 --> 0:02:08.080
<v Speaker 1>Use the code Juice one hundred. That's available in New Jersey, Colorado, Indiana,

0:02:08.120 --> 0:02:13.160
<v Speaker 1>West Virginia, Tennessee, Pennsylvania, Michigan, Virginia, Iowa, Washington, DC, Arizona, Nyoman.

0:02:13.520 --> 0:02:15.839
<v Speaker 1>Let's quickly do the recap of last week. Our guest

0:02:15.919 --> 0:02:18.960
<v Speaker 1>Pat Fitzmorris took an over so you can only go

0:02:19.120 --> 0:02:20.800
<v Speaker 1>up here bo. Yeah, it was a bad one. He

0:02:20.880 --> 0:02:22.520
<v Speaker 1>was very upset about it, by the way. The one

0:02:22.520 --> 0:02:25.120
<v Speaker 1>thing I will say about Pat is Pat takes this

0:02:25.200 --> 0:02:27.440
<v Speaker 1>to heart more than anybody I know. Like he is

0:02:27.520 --> 0:02:30.040
<v Speaker 1>like I can help believe it, blah blah blah. But

0:02:30.080 --> 0:02:32.000
<v Speaker 1>he is a great on the prop bets for sure,

0:02:32.040 --> 0:02:33.720
<v Speaker 1>and he's he's still been running hot on that, so

0:02:33.760 --> 0:02:36.799
<v Speaker 1>make sure you check out his article at bettingpros dot com.

0:02:36.840 --> 0:02:38.519
<v Speaker 3>But he missing the Chargers were one.

0:02:38.840 --> 0:02:41.080
<v Speaker 1>The Chargers were one. Yes, yes, the.

0:02:41.160 --> 0:02:44.280
<v Speaker 3>Chargers didn't miss on that. You know, everybody that was bad.

0:02:44.639 --> 0:02:46.680
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, man, anytime you're a double digit spread, though,

0:02:46.720 --> 0:02:49.600
<v Speaker 1>it always makes me just you know whatever, It makes

0:02:49.600 --> 0:02:51.360
<v Speaker 1>me tough this sort of take out. He also missed

0:02:51.360 --> 0:02:52.880
<v Speaker 1>on the Seahawks playing six and a half to the

0:02:52.880 --> 0:02:55.240
<v Speaker 1>Bears and the under forty three and a half points

0:02:55.240 --> 0:02:57.160
<v Speaker 1>in the Bills Patriots, so he really wasn't close on

0:02:57.200 --> 0:03:00.160
<v Speaker 1>any of them. I went two and one. Officially, I

0:03:00.240 --> 0:03:01.720
<v Speaker 1>hit on the Bills getting two and a half from

0:03:01.760 --> 0:03:04.320
<v Speaker 1>the Pats, the Raiders giving one to the Broncos, and

0:03:04.360 --> 0:03:06.800
<v Speaker 1>I missed on the Ravens who were getting three to

0:03:06.880 --> 0:03:09.280
<v Speaker 1>the Bengals. I did say, wait as long as possible,

0:03:09.320 --> 0:03:11.640
<v Speaker 1>and then after that everybody was declared out and it

0:03:11.680 --> 0:03:16.399
<v Speaker 1>was Joshahnson. But admittedly that game they would have probably lost.

0:03:16.520 --> 0:03:18.720
<v Speaker 3>They didn't lose because of Josh Johnson.

0:03:18.440 --> 0:03:20.639
<v Speaker 1>That's correct. They would have lost regardless of who was

0:03:20.639 --> 0:03:23.239
<v Speaker 1>that quarterback. So I will take the l on that regardless,

0:03:23.280 --> 0:03:26.000
<v Speaker 1>even though I did buy out of it, to be fair.

0:03:26.639 --> 0:03:29.320
<v Speaker 1>Once everything moved, I'm now basically an even twenty four

0:03:29.320 --> 0:03:31.520
<v Speaker 1>and twenty four in the year. So very exciting there.

0:03:31.520 --> 0:03:33.880
<v Speaker 1>All right, Bogwin, you're our guest. You get to lead

0:03:33.960 --> 0:03:36.360
<v Speaker 1>us off here. We just by the way, I just

0:03:36.480 --> 0:03:38.640
<v Speaker 1>found out Bogwin's picks right before this, because I don't

0:03:38.640 --> 0:03:40.360
<v Speaker 1>want to overlap on him, and I will say that

0:03:40.520 --> 0:03:42.600
<v Speaker 1>one of them was my picks. I'm very excited about

0:03:42.600 --> 0:03:44.960
<v Speaker 1>it bogwin, start us off anywhere you want. What do

0:03:44.960 --> 0:03:45.320
<v Speaker 1>you got?

0:03:45.440 --> 0:03:47.600
<v Speaker 2>Give me the Los Angeles Rams minus three and a

0:03:47.680 --> 0:03:50.800
<v Speaker 2>half on the road against those Baltimore Ravens. And the

0:03:50.880 --> 0:03:53.920
<v Speaker 2>reason I like the Rams in this game is number one, desperation.

0:03:54.000 --> 0:03:58.000
<v Speaker 2>They need wins, right, They need to keep the Cardinals

0:03:58.040 --> 0:04:00.920
<v Speaker 2>at arm's length here, so they they need this win.

0:04:01.320 --> 0:04:04.680
<v Speaker 2>And just the patheticness of the Ravens defense that we

0:04:04.760 --> 0:04:07.640
<v Speaker 2>saw last week. And it's not And I've hit this

0:04:07.720 --> 0:04:10.360
<v Speaker 2>part home because I'm a Steelers fan and everybody knows

0:04:10.400 --> 0:04:12.440
<v Speaker 2>that I don't like the Ravens. I don't like the Bengals,

0:04:12.440 --> 0:04:14.840
<v Speaker 2>I don't like the Browns, right, So I get it.

0:04:15.000 --> 0:04:17.560
<v Speaker 2>But it's not the Ravens' fault that they're bad. It's

0:04:17.560 --> 0:04:20.840
<v Speaker 2>not like their best skill position players are playing terribly.

0:04:21.200 --> 0:04:24.960
<v Speaker 2>They are down to guys off the street playing quarterback.

0:04:25.520 --> 0:04:28.840
<v Speaker 2>Anthony Averrett, who was terrible, who was third in the

0:04:28.960 --> 0:04:32.000
<v Speaker 2>league in yards given up, just had surgery and is

0:04:32.000 --> 0:04:33.800
<v Speaker 2>out for the year. And they were starting that guy.

0:04:34.160 --> 0:04:37.240
<v Speaker 2>So now Chris Westry and some other scrub are starting

0:04:37.360 --> 0:04:41.239
<v Speaker 2>in the defensive backfield for them, and Chuck Clark hasn't

0:04:41.240 --> 0:04:44.600
<v Speaker 2>been great all year, he's smart and he's the play

0:04:44.640 --> 0:04:47.360
<v Speaker 2>caller for them, but he hasn't been great in coverage.

0:04:47.400 --> 0:04:51.280
<v Speaker 2>So I just expect the Rams to sit and pick

0:04:51.400 --> 0:04:53.960
<v Speaker 2>the Ravens apart, and I think they win by way

0:04:53.960 --> 0:04:55.880
<v Speaker 2>more than three and a half, even on the road.

0:04:56.040 --> 0:04:58.479
<v Speaker 2>Lamar's GIMPI we don't know what the offense is gonna

0:04:58.480 --> 0:05:01.600
<v Speaker 2>look like, especially with this bust offensive line against erld

0:05:01.720 --> 0:05:04.920
<v Speaker 2>Aaron Donald and company. I just don't see a way

0:05:04.960 --> 0:05:06.880
<v Speaker 2>that the Ravens come away with a winning this game.

0:05:07.000 --> 0:05:09.719
<v Speaker 2>So give me the Rams and I'll lay the points.

0:05:10.240 --> 0:05:13.320
<v Speaker 1>My hesitation with it, bagman, is don't you think this

0:05:13.480 --> 0:05:15.880
<v Speaker 1>spread begs you to take the Rams? Like I mean,

0:05:15.920 --> 0:05:18.640
<v Speaker 1>you look at the Ravens right now. Their secondary, like

0:05:18.680 --> 0:05:21.800
<v Speaker 1>you said, is just an embarrassment and nothing to them,

0:05:21.839 --> 0:05:24.520
<v Speaker 1>Like they're just dealing with incredible amount of injuries and

0:05:24.920 --> 0:05:27.600
<v Speaker 1>kudos to John Harbaugh for keeping them together as long

0:05:27.640 --> 0:05:29.760
<v Speaker 1>as they have. But like I look at this and

0:05:29.760 --> 0:05:32.279
<v Speaker 1>I'm like, of course I'm taking the Rams. You know,

0:05:32.360 --> 0:05:34.120
<v Speaker 1>a team like the Rams, it gets me.

0:05:34.279 --> 0:05:36.960
<v Speaker 3>I just they know they laid some eggs. They have.

0:05:37.279 --> 0:05:40.039
<v Speaker 2>The Tennessee game after Derrick Henry got hurt was a

0:05:40.120 --> 0:05:42.279
<v Speaker 2>huge eg but I think they're past that point in

0:05:42.320 --> 0:05:44.320
<v Speaker 2>the season. And you know, some of it was growing

0:05:44.320 --> 0:05:47.400
<v Speaker 2>pains with Matthew Stafford and mcveighe it's getting on the

0:05:47.480 --> 0:05:49.480
<v Speaker 2>right page. But you saw him get on the right

0:05:49.480 --> 0:05:51.719
<v Speaker 2>page last week. And it looks like they've been building.

0:05:51.920 --> 0:05:52.360
<v Speaker 3>Obviously.

0:05:52.400 --> 0:05:55.120
<v Speaker 2>Henderson is down, but cam Akers is back now and

0:05:55.120 --> 0:05:58.320
<v Speaker 2>Sony Michelle is in a bang up job placing Henderson

0:05:58.320 --> 0:06:01.040
<v Speaker 2>as well. So and I know they lost Robert Woods,

0:06:01.080 --> 0:06:04.400
<v Speaker 2>but god, ob jay like the offense is starting to

0:06:04.520 --> 0:06:06.839
<v Speaker 2>click now. And yes, it is a little bit of

0:06:06.839 --> 0:06:09.680
<v Speaker 2>a bait game, but I think it started out at

0:06:09.680 --> 0:06:13.080
<v Speaker 2>three and it's because well, Lamar Jackson is going to play,

0:06:13.120 --> 0:06:15.320
<v Speaker 2>and Lamar Jackson makes the Ravens a different team, but

0:06:15.360 --> 0:06:16.520
<v Speaker 2>he doesn't help their defense.

0:06:16.640 --> 0:06:17.120
<v Speaker 3>Guy can't.

0:06:17.200 --> 0:06:19.000
<v Speaker 2>I mean, he probably could play corner, but they're not

0:06:19.040 --> 0:06:21.159
<v Speaker 2>going to put him out there to play corner, especially

0:06:21.200 --> 0:06:23.960
<v Speaker 2>as campy as he is. So I understand your hesitation

0:06:23.960 --> 0:06:26.320
<v Speaker 2>because the Rams have looked wishy washy this year, but

0:06:26.360 --> 0:06:26.960
<v Speaker 2>I think they're.

0:06:26.800 --> 0:06:28.840
<v Speaker 1>Locked in right now. Yeah, I wouldn't be surprised to

0:06:28.880 --> 0:06:31.920
<v Speaker 1>see the line move. I guess in favor then, because

0:06:32.200 --> 0:06:34.760
<v Speaker 1>it's true. And again we Lamar misspractice we're recording this

0:06:34.800 --> 0:06:38.360
<v Speaker 1>on Thursday, Mispractice today, So his best bet is really Gimby.

0:06:38.400 --> 0:06:40.360
<v Speaker 1>Other than that, you're looking at Huntley and you know

0:06:40.400 --> 0:06:43.440
<v Speaker 1>who is off the COVID Reserve nineteen list obviously, but

0:06:44.160 --> 0:06:46.160
<v Speaker 1>that's you know. I'm glad he played a great game

0:06:46.640 --> 0:06:48.680
<v Speaker 1>in the one that he did against the Packers, but

0:06:49.040 --> 0:06:51.160
<v Speaker 1>it's really hard to rely on them. So yeah, I

0:06:51.800 --> 0:06:54.320
<v Speaker 1>get it. I'm probably not gonna bet at myself, but

0:06:54.360 --> 0:06:56.960
<v Speaker 1>certainly there's no way I could back the Ravens in

0:06:57.040 --> 0:07:01.000
<v Speaker 1>this spot. I'm gonna go Bogmin and I gotta lead

0:07:01.040 --> 0:07:04.480
<v Speaker 1>with your with your boys, with your team, who I

0:07:04.480 --> 0:07:06.880
<v Speaker 1>imagine you're not too happy with right now, but I'm

0:07:06.880 --> 0:07:08.920
<v Speaker 1>gonna take them here, Bogman, get in three and a

0:07:08.960 --> 0:07:11.200
<v Speaker 1>half against the Browns. I assume it is. Actually I'm

0:07:11.200 --> 0:07:13.480
<v Speaker 1>gonna double check, make sure it's still at three. It's

0:07:13.480 --> 0:07:15.040
<v Speaker 1>still three and a half. I'm taking them three and

0:07:15.040 --> 0:07:18.040
<v Speaker 1>a half. And Bogman, you're a fan of the Steelers.

0:07:18.120 --> 0:07:21.120
<v Speaker 1>You know the classic Mike Tomlin spots, of course, and

0:07:21.560 --> 0:07:23.880
<v Speaker 1>this is one of them where you are left for dead.

0:07:23.920 --> 0:07:28.160
<v Speaker 1>You're coming off a horrific performance, You're an underdog. You

0:07:28.320 --> 0:07:31.200
<v Speaker 1>back Tomlin as an underdog. Yeah, Backham as an underdog

0:07:31.280 --> 0:07:33.840
<v Speaker 1>late in the season. You back them as a home dog, like,

0:07:34.040 --> 0:07:37.120
<v Speaker 1>that's just what you do. It's a second divisional game here.

0:07:37.200 --> 0:07:40.480
<v Speaker 1>Those games are always tight, like, regardless of anything, regardless

0:07:40.480 --> 0:07:42.840
<v Speaker 1>of the disparity among the teams, a second divisional game

0:07:43.120 --> 0:07:46.360
<v Speaker 1>is almost always tight. It's Ben's last game. There's my

0:07:46.440 --> 0:07:48.680
<v Speaker 1>garage door. Everybody knows who listens to the podcast still

0:07:48.880 --> 0:07:52.280
<v Speaker 1>still going. Don't worry about it. Every podcast doesn't matter.

0:07:52.600 --> 0:07:55.280
<v Speaker 1>It will happen. Okay, so it Ben's last game in

0:07:55.360 --> 0:07:59.120
<v Speaker 1>hinz Field all but confirmed as of today. They are terrible.

0:07:59.200 --> 0:08:01.120
<v Speaker 1>Of course, they look parable against the Chiefs, but the

0:08:01.160 --> 0:08:04.560
<v Speaker 1>Chiefs are really really good, especially at home. Like Baker

0:08:04.560 --> 0:08:08.160
<v Speaker 1>Mayfield's not playing great. He just had the four pick game.

0:08:08.320 --> 0:08:12.240
<v Speaker 1>Kevin Stefanski. I came across the stat on Twitter. Admittedly

0:08:12.440 --> 0:08:15.360
<v Speaker 1>I did not find in myself Kevin Stefanski in divisional

0:08:15.400 --> 0:08:18.280
<v Speaker 1>games is one to nine against the spread, which I

0:08:18.320 --> 0:08:23.320
<v Speaker 1>did not know. Came across it verified it. So that's crazy. Now,

0:08:23.520 --> 0:08:28.000
<v Speaker 1>look the on paper, you're like, okay, great, let's take

0:08:28.040 --> 0:08:30.480
<v Speaker 1>a great running team like the Browns and let's put

0:08:30.480 --> 0:08:32.839
<v Speaker 1>them against one of the worst rush defenses in all

0:08:32.880 --> 0:08:36.880
<v Speaker 1>football with the Steelers. That's not good. But Pittsburgh's thirtieth

0:08:36.920 --> 0:08:39.959
<v Speaker 1>in defensive DVOA against the run thirty first in defensive

0:08:40.000 --> 0:08:43.400
<v Speaker 1>DVOA against the run is the Packers who still just

0:08:43.480 --> 0:08:47.320
<v Speaker 1>managed to beat the Browns here. So again, I don't

0:08:47.360 --> 0:08:49.600
<v Speaker 1>love the Browns, Bogman. It really is like I think

0:08:49.640 --> 0:08:52.120
<v Speaker 1>Mayfield is just, you know, considering all the injuries stuff

0:08:52.160 --> 0:08:55.120
<v Speaker 1>like that, not playing well. I think this is just

0:08:55.200 --> 0:08:58.040
<v Speaker 1>a spot where Tomlin somehow figures out a way to

0:08:58.080 --> 0:09:01.080
<v Speaker 1>get them up off that loss. Would you with the hook?

0:09:01.200 --> 0:09:03.280
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't love it at three, although I'll probably bet

0:09:03.280 --> 0:09:04.640
<v Speaker 1>them on the money line too, just because I do

0:09:04.679 --> 0:09:08.679
<v Speaker 1>that always with a short home dog. But getting the hook, Bogwin,

0:09:09.320 --> 0:09:11.479
<v Speaker 1>I like it. Talk to me about your team.

0:09:11.320 --> 0:09:13.640
<v Speaker 3>I mean, you know it's they're not good.

0:09:14.000 --> 0:09:16.000
<v Speaker 2>I'll say, this is one of the worst Steelers teams

0:09:16.040 --> 0:09:19.280
<v Speaker 2>I've ever seen, But the worst Steeler team I ever

0:09:19.320 --> 0:09:22.000
<v Speaker 2>seen is about an average Browns team, you know, so,

0:09:22.760 --> 0:09:23.319
<v Speaker 2>and that's.

0:09:23.160 --> 0:09:23.560
<v Speaker 3>What you know.

0:09:23.640 --> 0:09:26.440
<v Speaker 2>The Browns are probably better than the Steelers right now.

0:09:26.480 --> 0:09:28.440
<v Speaker 2>But you know, all the stuff that you just said,

0:09:28.440 --> 0:09:32.120
<v Speaker 2>you got to take in consideration. Ben's teammates playing for

0:09:32.160 --> 0:09:34.800
<v Speaker 2>his pride in this game, because his regular season record

0:09:34.800 --> 0:09:36.880
<v Speaker 2>against the Browns is twenty five to three and one

0:09:37.240 --> 0:09:42.520
<v Speaker 2>in his career. So you know, I'm picking the Steelers too.

0:09:42.640 --> 0:09:44.840
<v Speaker 2>I never bet the Steelers because I find that to

0:09:44.880 --> 0:09:47.120
<v Speaker 2>be bad luck for me and I hate losing twice,

0:09:47.240 --> 0:09:49.680
<v Speaker 2>you know, losing in my real life with my team

0:09:49.720 --> 0:09:52.880
<v Speaker 2>and then my mom too, So I just never find

0:09:52.920 --> 0:09:55.640
<v Speaker 2>that to be good luck. They do match up well

0:09:55.679 --> 0:09:58.400
<v Speaker 2>here the Browns against Pittsburgh because they are running team

0:09:58.440 --> 0:10:01.680
<v Speaker 2>against a bad running defense. But in the divisional games,

0:10:01.679 --> 0:10:04.280
<v Speaker 2>things get weird, especially in AFC North divisional games. I

0:10:04.280 --> 0:10:07.160
<v Speaker 2>mean Cleveland was clicking on all cylinders early earlier in

0:10:07.200 --> 0:10:10.200
<v Speaker 2>this year they played Pittsburgh. Pittsburgh won fifteen to ten,

0:10:10.360 --> 0:10:13.880
<v Speaker 2>you know, so just it doesn't make any sense sometimes

0:10:13.880 --> 0:10:17.680
<v Speaker 2>this rivalry. So I'm definitely taking the Steelers at home

0:10:17.880 --> 0:10:20.600
<v Speaker 2>with his teammates playing for him in his very last

0:10:20.600 --> 0:10:21.960
<v Speaker 2>home game for Ben.

0:10:22.120 --> 0:10:24.320
<v Speaker 1>So I'm just going to be shocked, man, I'm going

0:10:24.360 --> 0:10:27.000
<v Speaker 1>to be shocked if they not. I could see them losing.

0:10:27.080 --> 0:10:29.760
<v Speaker 2>I think if Cleveland wins, they blow the doors off Pittsburgh.

0:10:29.800 --> 0:10:32.000
<v Speaker 2>I don't think it's every close win. I think if

0:10:32.000 --> 0:10:34.199
<v Speaker 2>Cleveland wins, it's going to be just like the playoff

0:10:34.240 --> 0:10:37.719
<v Speaker 2>game last year. They come in, they stunned the Steelers

0:10:37.760 --> 0:10:39.480
<v Speaker 2>and then they're stunned for the rest of the game.

0:10:40.160 --> 0:10:42.319
<v Speaker 2>With something like that, I don't think it's going to

0:10:42.360 --> 0:10:45.280
<v Speaker 2>be a down to the wire win for Cleveland. I

0:10:45.280 --> 0:10:47.760
<v Speaker 2>think if it's down to the wire, I would favorite Pittsburgh.

0:10:47.840 --> 0:10:50.720
<v Speaker 1>The craziest thing, Bagman, is that both of these teams

0:10:50.760 --> 0:10:53.480
<v Speaker 1>at this point like could be this could be a

0:10:53.480 --> 0:10:55.400
<v Speaker 1>fight for the division. That's right.

0:10:55.480 --> 0:10:59.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, they're both in playoff contention still somehow with

0:10:59.520 --> 0:11:02.120
<v Speaker 2>the terrible seasons that they're having, and they're both you know,

0:11:02.200 --> 0:11:05.360
<v Speaker 2>not good. But we've seen weird stuff happen in the playoffs.

0:11:05.400 --> 0:11:07.000
<v Speaker 2>So all you got to do is get in, get

0:11:07.040 --> 0:11:09.400
<v Speaker 2>into the playoffs, and that's the goal for everybody right now.

0:11:09.440 --> 0:11:11.680
<v Speaker 1>I think if the Chiefs beat the Bengals and the

0:11:11.720 --> 0:11:14.319
<v Speaker 1>Browns control their own destiny to win the division, I

0:11:14.440 --> 0:11:16.800
<v Speaker 1>think that's what it is. And the Steelers if they

0:11:16.880 --> 0:11:18.880
<v Speaker 1>win and then the Bengals is next week, and then

0:11:18.960 --> 0:11:21.080
<v Speaker 1>the Steelers. If the Browns beat the Bengals next week,

0:11:22.240 --> 0:11:23.199
<v Speaker 1>win the division for.

0:11:23.200 --> 0:11:25.080
<v Speaker 2>The Steelers to win the division, but they can still

0:11:25.080 --> 0:11:25.800
<v Speaker 2>get a wild card.

0:11:26.000 --> 0:11:28.599
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, correct, Yeah, the Bargers.

0:11:28.200 --> 0:11:30.080
<v Speaker 2>Are playing the way the Ravens are playing, and the

0:11:30.120 --> 0:11:32.360
<v Speaker 2>Browns and everybody in front of them is not good

0:11:32.360 --> 0:11:36.520
<v Speaker 2>except for maybe Miami. Yeah, it's that last seed is

0:11:36.800 --> 0:11:38.240
<v Speaker 2>up for grabs for sure.

0:11:38.720 --> 0:11:41.480
<v Speaker 1>Spoiler alert. I do not expect Miami to win this game,

0:11:41.480 --> 0:11:43.880
<v Speaker 1>which we'll talk about in a little bit, but yeah,

0:11:43.920 --> 0:11:46.800
<v Speaker 1>I will. I Everything about this points to the Steelers

0:11:46.800 --> 0:11:48.880
<v Speaker 1>here and again, there have been games where I've been like,

0:11:48.920 --> 0:11:50.959
<v Speaker 1>this is almost spot, I love it, and then they

0:11:51.080 --> 0:11:53.120
<v Speaker 1>I think against the second game against the Bengals where

0:11:53.120 --> 0:11:55.560
<v Speaker 1>I was like, oh, this perfect spot, second divisional game,

0:11:55.720 --> 0:11:58.200
<v Speaker 1>and then they just got their brains beat in That

0:11:58.320 --> 0:12:00.520
<v Speaker 1>happens obviously on occasion. If they go in here on

0:12:00.559 --> 0:12:02.520
<v Speaker 1>Monday night the Browns and beat the crap out of

0:12:02.520 --> 0:12:04.840
<v Speaker 1>the Steelers, I'm just I'm just gonna be totally floored

0:12:04.840 --> 0:12:06.600
<v Speaker 1>by it. So give me a Steelers getting the three

0:12:06.600 --> 0:12:08.400
<v Speaker 1>and a half. Go to your number two pick here, Boga.

0:12:08.520 --> 0:12:10.080
<v Speaker 2>I'm gonna stay in the same game I just mentioned.

0:12:10.120 --> 0:12:12.600
<v Speaker 2>I'm gonna take the over for the Rams and Ravens

0:12:12.600 --> 0:12:17.240
<v Speaker 2>as well. Like you said, Lamar, looking GIMPI probably better

0:12:17.320 --> 0:12:19.600
<v Speaker 2>for the over because I'd rather have a healthy Tyler

0:12:19.679 --> 0:12:22.800
<v Speaker 2>Huntley in there than a fifty percent Lamar Jackson, which

0:12:22.840 --> 0:12:25.120
<v Speaker 2>looks like it's going to trend towards that way. But

0:12:25.480 --> 0:12:28.120
<v Speaker 2>like I said, the Rams are going to get most

0:12:28.160 --> 0:12:30.040
<v Speaker 2>of this. I think the Rams score five touchdowns, so

0:12:30.040 --> 0:12:32.320
<v Speaker 2>it's thirty five of this forty six and a half

0:12:32.480 --> 0:12:35.160
<v Speaker 2>of the over here. So we're asking the Ravens to

0:12:35.160 --> 0:12:38.360
<v Speaker 2>score twice two touchdowns, and I think they can do that,

0:12:38.880 --> 0:12:41.000
<v Speaker 2>even if it's in garbage time. You know, Betting the

0:12:41.040 --> 0:12:46.120
<v Speaker 2>over is frustrating sometimes because what you do is you

0:12:46.160 --> 0:12:47.679
<v Speaker 2>look at that first half and you go, all right, well,

0:12:47.679 --> 0:12:50.800
<v Speaker 2>they're not pacing. They're not pacing at all. You know,

0:12:50.880 --> 0:12:53.760
<v Speaker 2>everybody does this. Everyone who the over goes this pace

0:12:53.880 --> 0:12:56.520
<v Speaker 2>is not right. They're off the pace, you know. But

0:12:56.760 --> 0:12:58.880
<v Speaker 2>also you got to remember more points scored in the

0:12:58.920 --> 0:13:02.640
<v Speaker 2>second half, right, Defenses retired in offenses make adjustments. Right,

0:13:02.880 --> 0:13:06.200
<v Speaker 2>So then in the third quarter you're like, okay, all right, okay,

0:13:06.440 --> 0:13:08.480
<v Speaker 2>And in the fourth quarter you're getting closer and closer

0:13:08.520 --> 0:13:11.960
<v Speaker 2>until you eventually hit it or you know you don't.

0:13:12.760 --> 0:13:14.560
<v Speaker 2>But in the fourth quarter you have a pretty good idea.

0:13:14.640 --> 0:13:16.240
<v Speaker 2>But I do I expect the Rams to pick the

0:13:16.320 --> 0:13:20.360
<v Speaker 2>Ravens defensive part, and I think they get the majority

0:13:20.400 --> 0:13:23.280
<v Speaker 2>of this over. And I think both these teams, you know,

0:13:23.600 --> 0:13:27.160
<v Speaker 2>no one is great as far as their record on

0:13:27.360 --> 0:13:30.320
<v Speaker 2>over unders. Right, the best record for over unders is

0:13:30.400 --> 0:13:32.959
<v Speaker 2>nine and six this year Philly, the Jets, Minnesota all

0:13:33.040 --> 0:13:35.839
<v Speaker 2>nine and six. The Rams are eight six and one,

0:13:35.880 --> 0:13:38.840
<v Speaker 2>so they have the best record in playing second best

0:13:38.880 --> 0:13:42.400
<v Speaker 2>record in playing towards the over this season. The Ravens

0:13:42.440 --> 0:13:45.079
<v Speaker 2>are eight and seven. So you know, these are two

0:13:45.160 --> 0:13:49.160
<v Speaker 2>teams that hit the over more often than most other

0:13:49.200 --> 0:13:52.880
<v Speaker 2>teams in the NFL, so I think this lends towards

0:13:52.880 --> 0:13:55.040
<v Speaker 2>that over as well. Plus just the bad state of

0:13:55.080 --> 0:13:58.360
<v Speaker 2>this Ravens secondary. So giving the Rams over and the

0:13:58.480 --> 0:14:00.560
<v Speaker 2>Rams and lay the points, I like bet on that

0:14:00.600 --> 0:14:03.640
<v Speaker 2>game this week. Yeah, against the Ravens too. It's fun.

0:14:03.880 --> 0:14:06.880
<v Speaker 1>Sure, why not just go Ravens every single time? This

0:14:07.080 --> 0:14:08.840
<v Speaker 1>was one of my picks, Yes, I agree, I had it,

0:14:08.880 --> 0:14:11.200
<v Speaker 1>which I was like, oh, interesting, because usually we're able

0:14:11.200 --> 0:14:13.640
<v Speaker 1>to share picks beforehand, you and I weren't. You were like, oh,

0:14:13.679 --> 0:14:15.120
<v Speaker 1>I'll just tell you what they are, and I'm like,

0:14:15.120 --> 0:14:17.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure we don't overlap. And that was oddly enough,

0:14:18.080 --> 0:14:19.840
<v Speaker 1>the one over under that I had. I agree with

0:14:19.840 --> 0:14:21.400
<v Speaker 1>you completely in this one. I think the Rams are

0:14:21.440 --> 0:14:23.480
<v Speaker 1>going to put up a ton of points. Again, talked

0:14:23.520 --> 0:14:26.760
<v Speaker 1>about it when you talked about the spread, just the secondary.

0:14:26.800 --> 0:14:29.160
<v Speaker 1>They're just going to be able to pass all over them.

0:14:29.600 --> 0:14:32.280
<v Speaker 1>And I do think you're right. I don't expect Lamar

0:14:32.360 --> 0:14:33.920
<v Speaker 1>Jackson to go at this point. I think when you're

0:14:33.960 --> 0:14:36.280
<v Speaker 1>out there and you're really, really gimpy and then you're

0:14:36.280 --> 0:14:38.960
<v Speaker 1>a DNP the next day like that just can't be good.

0:14:39.120 --> 0:14:40.960
<v Speaker 1>And I think it's better for the Ravens offense then

0:14:41.120 --> 0:14:43.640
<v Speaker 1>if you have a fully healthy Tyler Huntley with the

0:14:43.760 --> 0:14:47.200
<v Speaker 1>entire week to prepare and really multiple weeks at this point,

0:14:47.400 --> 0:14:49.320
<v Speaker 1>rather than a gimbie Lamar Jackson. So I agree with

0:14:49.360 --> 0:14:51.480
<v Speaker 1>you over forty six and a half, I will adopt

0:14:51.720 --> 0:14:54.840
<v Speaker 1>your play. My next pick, bog when is the Titans

0:14:54.920 --> 0:14:57.160
<v Speaker 1>length three and a half to the Dolphins. This is

0:14:57.240 --> 0:15:00.640
<v Speaker 1>much more about a fade of the Dolphins. Dolphins streak

0:15:00.840 --> 0:15:03.480
<v Speaker 1>when you look at it, it's been really remarkable. It's

0:15:03.600 --> 0:15:06.600
<v Speaker 1>just basically beaten the worst teams in the history of

0:15:06.640 --> 0:15:09.920
<v Speaker 1>football with when you consider the quarterback play other than

0:15:10.080 --> 0:15:15.080
<v Speaker 1>the real I mean in book would look almost ready

0:15:15.320 --> 0:15:18.160
<v Speaker 1>for like a pee wee football game. But yeah, it

0:15:18.200 --> 0:15:20.000
<v Speaker 1>was not. It was not close. Yes, I mean, you

0:15:20.040 --> 0:15:23.359
<v Speaker 1>think about it. It's the Texans, the Jets twice, the Panthers,

0:15:23.640 --> 0:15:26.480
<v Speaker 1>the Giants with Glennon, the Saints with Book, and the Ravens.

0:15:26.480 --> 0:15:28.880
<v Speaker 1>That game on Thursday was very impressive. With the Ravens,

0:15:28.880 --> 0:15:31.200
<v Speaker 1>I admit on that one. But you know, they're just

0:15:31.920 --> 0:15:34.240
<v Speaker 1>I don't think they're a very good football team. Overall,

0:15:34.280 --> 0:15:38.120
<v Speaker 1>They're fine. Pro Football Reference Bagman has a rating system

0:15:38.160 --> 0:15:41.720
<v Speaker 1>which shows basically that the Dolphins are two points worse

0:15:41.800 --> 0:15:44.040
<v Speaker 1>than the average football team. The Titans are two and

0:15:44.040 --> 0:15:46.000
<v Speaker 1>a half points better than the average football team. So

0:15:46.120 --> 0:15:48.000
<v Speaker 1>if you gave that credence and you put that together,

0:15:48.000 --> 0:15:50.640
<v Speaker 1>it be four and a half points spread on a

0:15:50.680 --> 0:15:52.480
<v Speaker 1>neutral site. This is a three and a half point

0:15:52.520 --> 0:15:56.280
<v Speaker 1>spread in Tennessee. I think with AJ Brown back, And

0:15:56.320 --> 0:15:58.320
<v Speaker 1>again we have to watch this because Julio Jones was

0:15:58.320 --> 0:16:01.400
<v Speaker 1>placed on the COVID nineteen reserve list. If Brown gets

0:16:01.400 --> 0:16:04.560
<v Speaker 1>put on it, I'm off this game obviously entirely. But

0:16:04.640 --> 0:16:07.080
<v Speaker 1>obviously Julio make come back now that matters. You saw

0:16:07.120 --> 0:16:09.640
<v Speaker 1>what AJ Brown can do and I get.

0:16:09.640 --> 0:16:13.400
<v Speaker 2>Save how good he was a practice in oh, like whatever,

0:16:13.400 --> 0:16:15.800
<v Speaker 2>what eight weeks or whatever, a practice and a half.

0:16:15.880 --> 0:16:16.160
<v Speaker 3>That's it.

0:16:16.240 --> 0:16:17.720
<v Speaker 2>I was like, I'm not starting to Ancient Brown. I'm

0:16:17.760 --> 0:16:19.840
<v Speaker 2>not brave brave now Fryan tannels like like garbage the

0:16:19.880 --> 0:16:22.800
<v Speaker 2>whole year. And then he just went crazy against the

0:16:22.840 --> 0:16:23.880
<v Speaker 2>Niners on Thursday night.

0:16:24.360 --> 0:16:26.720
<v Speaker 1>Now I mean without without Mosley, Like their secondary is

0:16:26.760 --> 0:16:29.240
<v Speaker 1>terrible anyway, I get it. But I was completely with you.

0:16:29.280 --> 0:16:31.280
<v Speaker 1>And again we do fantasy as well, and I ranked

0:16:31.320 --> 0:16:33.560
<v Speaker 1>AJ Brown and when I was like sort of doing

0:16:33.560 --> 0:16:36.360
<v Speaker 1>my projection, it was like, there's just no way he's

0:16:36.400 --> 0:16:38.640
<v Speaker 1>going to get enough snaps at this point. But what

0:16:38.760 --> 0:16:41.040
<v Speaker 1>was great about that bagman is at some point it

0:16:41.200 --> 0:16:43.200
<v Speaker 1>was like it was like somebody getting on a heater

0:16:43.320 --> 0:16:45.080
<v Speaker 1>with like a guy in craps getting on a heater

0:16:45.120 --> 0:16:45.480
<v Speaker 1>with a roll.

0:16:45.600 --> 0:16:45.680
<v Speaker 2>Right.

0:16:45.720 --> 0:16:47.960
<v Speaker 1>You were just like all, I'm just going to you,

0:16:47.600 --> 0:16:50.040
<v Speaker 1>going to you, and they knew it was going to Brown.

0:16:50.080 --> 0:16:51.800
<v Speaker 1>There was nothing they could do about it. And that

0:16:52.040 --> 0:16:54.480
<v Speaker 1>is how good he actually is. So I do think

0:16:54.520 --> 0:16:57.560
<v Speaker 1>like regardless of the secondary, because the Dolphins secondary, which

0:16:57.560 --> 0:17:00.920
<v Speaker 1>at one point was just they were the names are great,

0:17:01.000 --> 0:17:01.840
<v Speaker 1>right obviously you know.

0:17:01.800 --> 0:17:03.960
<v Speaker 2>They played musical chairs a lot in the beginning of

0:17:04.000 --> 0:17:07.600
<v Speaker 2>the year with that secondary they went with Nick need

0:17:07.680 --> 0:17:09.479
<v Speaker 2>Him for a while and it was just like Coleman

0:17:09.560 --> 0:17:12.679
<v Speaker 2>and they bounce around, but they did finally Javon holland

0:17:12.680 --> 0:17:16.040
<v Speaker 2>Brandon Johnes they settled on their safeties and they're both

0:17:16.080 --> 0:17:16.560
<v Speaker 2>really good.

0:17:16.960 --> 0:17:19.560
<v Speaker 1>But I still think that even though they are now

0:17:19.720 --> 0:17:21.879
<v Speaker 1>finally sort of more back to what we kind of

0:17:21.880 --> 0:17:24.080
<v Speaker 1>expected them to be in the preseason, it's still I

0:17:24.400 --> 0:17:27.439
<v Speaker 1>just think that Brown being there, even without Derrick Henry

0:17:27.520 --> 0:17:29.359
<v Speaker 1>and you know, Theonta Foreman has been fine. They couldn't

0:17:29.359 --> 0:17:31.440
<v Speaker 1>get much going against s Francisco. I just think they're

0:17:31.440 --> 0:17:33.840
<v Speaker 1>a much better team, and I think that I like,

0:17:33.920 --> 0:17:36.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't love the hook like obviously, but I still

0:17:37.000 --> 0:17:38.959
<v Speaker 1>think this is a game they're gonna win by a

0:17:39.000 --> 0:17:43.080
<v Speaker 1>touchdown with Brown back. So and again I'm assuming Budgetree

0:17:43.160 --> 0:17:44.640
<v Speaker 1>by the way, comes off the COVID list as well.

0:17:44.720 --> 0:17:47.159
<v Speaker 1>So that's something that I'm just with the new protocols,

0:17:47.320 --> 0:17:49.240
<v Speaker 1>but I will take them. Bogman much more of a

0:17:49.280 --> 0:17:51.440
<v Speaker 1>fade of the Dolphins. You've got the Titans, by the way,

0:17:51.440 --> 0:17:54.600
<v Speaker 1>with the ability potentially here to now seal the division.

0:17:54.840 --> 0:17:56.639
<v Speaker 1>Win that one They're still in the air for the

0:17:56.720 --> 0:17:59.160
<v Speaker 1>number one seed, you know, depending especially on what happens

0:17:59.200 --> 0:18:01.600
<v Speaker 1>with the Bengals against Chiefs. Can't get that buy. So

0:18:01.920 --> 0:18:03.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna go with the Titan deer Lang three and alfter.

0:18:03.760 --> 0:18:08.200
<v Speaker 2>The Dolphins, I I don't like that. I definitely took

0:18:08.240 --> 0:18:11.080
<v Speaker 2>Miami in this game, but I tend to get Tennessee

0:18:11.119 --> 0:18:14.240
<v Speaker 2>wrong like most weeks because like we said, you know,

0:18:14.520 --> 0:18:16.480
<v Speaker 2>the Rams, who we thought were gonna beat the crap

0:18:16.520 --> 0:18:19.760
<v Speaker 2>out of Tennessee after Derrick Henry lost at home to them,

0:18:19.880 --> 0:18:23.199
<v Speaker 2>so they do pull off some weird wins, but then

0:18:23.240 --> 0:18:25.240
<v Speaker 2>they lost to Pittsburgh, And I told you Pittsburgh is

0:18:25.280 --> 0:18:28.040
<v Speaker 2>not a good team, So, like you know, Tennessee is

0:18:28.160 --> 0:18:29.520
<v Speaker 2>a bit of a roller coaster.

0:18:29.800 --> 0:18:30.640
<v Speaker 3>The Dolphins too.

0:18:30.760 --> 0:18:33.480
<v Speaker 2>I think if Taysom Hill starts that game, I don't

0:18:33.480 --> 0:18:36.040
<v Speaker 2>think the Dolphins win it. Right, You're not getting to

0:18:36.080 --> 0:18:36.800
<v Speaker 2>Taysom Hill eight.

0:18:36.960 --> 0:18:39.120
<v Speaker 1>Are you impressed by that win over the doll I'm

0:18:39.119 --> 0:18:39.840
<v Speaker 1>not impressed by.

0:18:40.520 --> 0:18:43.040
<v Speaker 2>Because the Saints were in it the whole time with

0:18:43.160 --> 0:18:47.040
<v Speaker 2>Ian book and I said, I told my friend Bubba

0:18:47.160 --> 0:18:50.560
<v Speaker 2>on our Line Star show, I said, I would rather

0:18:50.640 --> 0:18:53.160
<v Speaker 2>have Mason Rudolph than Ian Book. He's like, well, that's

0:18:53.200 --> 0:18:55.199
<v Speaker 2>all you need to know about Ian Book. Know how

0:18:55.280 --> 0:18:59.000
<v Speaker 2>much you hate Mason Rudolph. Yes, absolutely, Ian Book wasn't

0:18:59.040 --> 0:19:01.120
<v Speaker 2>good at Notre Dame. I can't I believe he got drafted,

0:19:01.920 --> 0:19:03.560
<v Speaker 2>you know, And I thought they were gonna end up

0:19:03.560 --> 0:19:05.960
<v Speaker 2>doing that same stuff with Taysom Hill that you know,

0:19:06.000 --> 0:19:08.000
<v Speaker 2>that's why they draft drafted I in Book, right, But

0:19:08.080 --> 0:19:10.080
<v Speaker 2>sometimes you draft a guy like Danny Etling to turn

0:19:10.119 --> 0:19:12.360
<v Speaker 2>him into a wide receiver like the Patriots did, who

0:19:12.359 --> 0:19:15.320
<v Speaker 2>play quarterback at LSU, And so I thought, maybe they're

0:19:15.320 --> 0:19:17.479
<v Speaker 2>gonna move in positions. That was my first thought when

0:19:17.520 --> 0:19:19.840
<v Speaker 2>he and Book got drafted. Not he's going to start

0:19:19.840 --> 0:19:21.960
<v Speaker 2>a game when they're down to the third string quarterback

0:19:22.040 --> 0:19:26.440
<v Speaker 2>ever in the NFL. So them not blowing them out

0:19:26.440 --> 0:19:30.119
<v Speaker 2>of the water made me go, Okay, you know, the

0:19:30.200 --> 0:19:32.880
<v Speaker 2>offense was really just not great. It's all Jayla Wattle.

0:19:32.960 --> 0:19:35.919
<v Speaker 2>That's all they have right now. So yeah, they're screwing

0:19:35.920 --> 0:19:38.200
<v Speaker 2>around with those running backs way too much. Stuke Johnson

0:19:38.240 --> 0:19:40.280
<v Speaker 2>and Philip lindsay now because Gascon is coming off the

0:19:40.359 --> 0:19:44.480
<v Speaker 2>COVID and all that stuff, I just both these seems

0:19:44.520 --> 0:19:47.680
<v Speaker 2>to me are hard to figure out. So yes, I'll

0:19:47.800 --> 0:19:50.520
<v Speaker 2>say I'm taking Miami, but it's not with a great

0:19:50.520 --> 0:19:51.360
<v Speaker 2>amount of confidence.

0:19:51.520 --> 0:19:54.560
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, and again I think everything you're saying is correct.

0:19:54.560 --> 0:19:56.440
<v Speaker 1>The Titans have been a very tough team to figure

0:19:56.440 --> 0:19:58.960
<v Speaker 1>out because again, they were winning all these games. Once

0:19:59.000 --> 0:20:01.040
<v Speaker 1>Derrick Henry went out where you were like, you shouldn't

0:20:01.080 --> 0:20:02.879
<v Speaker 1>really be winning these games.

0:20:03.200 --> 0:20:05.439
<v Speaker 2>And then they play Pittsburgh and you're like, beat the

0:20:05.480 --> 0:20:07.160
<v Speaker 2>crap out of Pittsburgh and they don't win.

0:20:08.359 --> 0:20:09.960
<v Speaker 1>And even by the way, this game against the forty

0:20:10.000 --> 0:20:12.479
<v Speaker 1>nine ers, which I was on the Titans and I

0:20:12.600 --> 0:20:15.280
<v Speaker 1>thought after the first drive, I was like, boy, this

0:20:15.359 --> 0:20:17.320
<v Speaker 1>was a terrible pick and maybe they wouldn't have even

0:20:17.400 --> 0:20:19.960
<v Speaker 1>won if Garoppolo apparently hadn't gotten hurt in that game.

0:20:20.040 --> 0:20:23.280
<v Speaker 1>Like who knows, but they have they they have a way, man,

0:20:23.480 --> 0:20:25.480
<v Speaker 1>they have a way of figuring out this tough and

0:20:25.520 --> 0:20:26.600
<v Speaker 1>I think, yeah, we like.

0:20:26.600 --> 0:20:30.680
<v Speaker 2>A first round out, but they're gonna have Derrick Henry back,

0:20:32.680 --> 0:20:37.560
<v Speaker 2>so that changes a whole landscape of this team, so absolutely.

0:20:37.000 --> 0:20:38.280
<v Speaker 3>And who knows.

0:20:38.520 --> 0:20:40.840
<v Speaker 1>And again, a big part of it really is the

0:20:41.080 --> 0:20:43.320
<v Speaker 1>fade of the Dolphins. Rather than buying the I think

0:20:43.320 --> 0:20:45.200
<v Speaker 1>that I just think this is going to end This ride,

0:20:45.320 --> 0:20:48.520
<v Speaker 1>which has been incredible sort of to watch, is just

0:20:48.520 --> 0:20:50.400
<v Speaker 1>going to end at some point. So that's my second pick.

0:20:50.480 --> 0:20:51.840
<v Speaker 1>How about your third pick?

0:20:52.080 --> 0:20:54.400
<v Speaker 2>My third pick, I'm going to roll with the over

0:20:54.600 --> 0:20:56.399
<v Speaker 2>in the Seattle and Detroit game.

0:20:56.880 --> 0:20:58.680
<v Speaker 3>It's forty two and a half, so it's low.

0:20:58.840 --> 0:21:00.800
<v Speaker 2>You know, we get a twenty one twenty one game

0:21:00.840 --> 0:21:03.359
<v Speaker 2>and then have a field goal kicked and we're right there.

0:21:03.480 --> 0:21:05.359
<v Speaker 2>The twenty four to twenty one game gets us home,

0:21:05.520 --> 0:21:07.080
<v Speaker 2>and that's what I expected in this game. I don't

0:21:07.200 --> 0:21:09.520
<v Speaker 2>expect it to go way way over, But I do

0:21:09.560 --> 0:21:11.480
<v Speaker 2>think that the Lions are a better offense with Jared

0:21:11.520 --> 0:21:13.800
<v Speaker 2>Goff and instead of Tim Boyle. That's why they only

0:21:13.800 --> 0:21:16.840
<v Speaker 2>put up sixteen points last week. Jared Goff is back,

0:21:17.240 --> 0:21:20.080
<v Speaker 2>it's not great. In fact, the only person worse at

0:21:20.080 --> 0:21:23.360
<v Speaker 2>throwing the ball down the field this year then Trevor Lawrence,

0:21:23.480 --> 0:21:27.199
<v Speaker 2>is Jared Goff. But the Seattle defense was bad the

0:21:27.240 --> 0:21:29.960
<v Speaker 2>whole year. Now with Jamal Adams out, it is horrific.

0:21:30.200 --> 0:21:32.680
<v Speaker 2>You just saw the Bearers come back with Nick Foles

0:21:32.920 --> 0:21:35.520
<v Speaker 2>against them in Seattle, and that game.

0:21:35.400 --> 0:21:36.560
<v Speaker 3>Was twenty five twenty four.

0:21:36.680 --> 0:21:41.719
<v Speaker 2>So the Lions are a covering machine, but their secondary

0:21:41.760 --> 0:21:44.040
<v Speaker 2>has been beat to crap too. This is another team

0:21:44.080 --> 0:21:46.560
<v Speaker 2>a lot like the Ravens, not necessarily their fault. They've

0:21:46.600 --> 0:21:49.200
<v Speaker 2>had so many guys in the secondary go down. Jerry

0:21:49.280 --> 0:21:52.040
<v Speaker 2>Jacobs I didn't know about before the season started, and

0:21:52.080 --> 0:21:54.320
<v Speaker 2>he started a ton of games for this team. Blowed

0:21:54.359 --> 0:21:56.560
<v Speaker 2>his knee and he's out, so they're down too. Guys

0:21:56.640 --> 0:21:59.399
<v Speaker 2>I've never heard of once again starting for them at

0:21:59.440 --> 0:22:02.439
<v Speaker 2>the end of the year because of injuries plus COVID,

0:22:02.480 --> 0:22:04.959
<v Speaker 2>plus you know, just being not a great team. So

0:22:06.560 --> 0:22:08.760
<v Speaker 2>I expect Tyler Lockett to go crazy. He's one of

0:22:08.760 --> 0:22:11.960
<v Speaker 2>my DFS picks this week. I think Metcalf could go

0:22:12.000 --> 0:22:12.520
<v Speaker 2>crazy too.

0:22:12.560 --> 0:22:12.880
<v Speaker 3>A monor.

0:22:12.960 --> 0:22:16.080
<v Speaker 2>Saint Brown has proven that he is a quarterback proof.

0:22:16.440 --> 0:22:20.040
<v Speaker 2>Seahawks can't can't stop the run to save their life.

0:22:20.119 --> 0:22:22.600
<v Speaker 2>They can't do anything on defense. Man, it's a bad roster.

0:22:22.800 --> 0:22:26.760
<v Speaker 2>So I think that this game is definitely gonna go over.

0:22:26.880 --> 0:22:29.600
<v Speaker 2>I expect the Seahawks to win it, but I don't

0:22:29.600 --> 0:22:31.960
<v Speaker 2>have a ton of confidence in them because the Lions

0:22:32.000 --> 0:22:35.080
<v Speaker 2>are covering machines. So the Lions might win this game

0:22:35.119 --> 0:22:37.760
<v Speaker 2>straight up. But I do love the over because both

0:22:37.800 --> 0:22:39.000
<v Speaker 2>these defenses are poors.

0:22:39.119 --> 0:22:41.199
<v Speaker 1>Right now, Yeah, you make a good case for it.

0:22:41.240 --> 0:22:42.880
<v Speaker 1>And at forty two and a half, you really don't

0:22:42.880 --> 0:22:45.359
<v Speaker 1>need much to go right to go over that game right.

0:22:45.280 --> 0:22:47.680
<v Speaker 2>One going into the fourth to get us a field

0:22:47.720 --> 0:22:49.800
<v Speaker 2>goal to win it, long as it doesn't die.

0:22:49.920 --> 0:22:53.600
<v Speaker 1>And you can see them like you can see the

0:22:53.600 --> 0:22:57.680
<v Speaker 1>Seahawks basically trying to have a game where just things

0:22:57.720 --> 0:23:00.800
<v Speaker 1>go right in the passing game, just for Russell. Get

0:23:00.800 --> 0:23:03.080
<v Speaker 1>this taste out of their mouth like it has been

0:23:03.200 --> 0:23:04.080
<v Speaker 1>terrible right now.

0:23:04.119 --> 0:23:06.160
<v Speaker 2>And if you got Russ to stay too, you got

0:23:06.200 --> 0:23:07.520
<v Speaker 2>to make it fun for him. You got to make

0:23:07.600 --> 0:23:09.640
<v Speaker 2>the last couple of weeks and putting up points and

0:23:09.680 --> 0:23:12.600
<v Speaker 2>seeing the silver lining for next year so he doesn't

0:23:12.600 --> 0:23:15.480
<v Speaker 2>demand that trade that he didn't really demand this year

0:23:15.880 --> 0:23:18.960
<v Speaker 2>kind of buddy, did you know whatever it was? So

0:23:19.720 --> 0:23:22.080
<v Speaker 2>you know, if you want him to stay, you gotta

0:23:22.119 --> 0:23:24.080
<v Speaker 2>make it. You gotta make it so he wants to

0:23:24.200 --> 0:23:25.919
<v Speaker 2>So you gotta make him have fun. Put up some

0:23:25.960 --> 0:23:28.919
<v Speaker 2>points with them, let Russ cook as the kids can say, Dan.

0:23:29.400 --> 0:23:32.760
<v Speaker 1>Yes, I do like that phrase, those those children who

0:23:32.880 --> 0:23:35.440
<v Speaker 1>use it. Yeah, all right, so I'm with you. Actually

0:23:35.440 --> 0:23:37.040
<v Speaker 1>I like it. I hadn't considered that game, but that

0:23:37.160 --> 0:23:39.919
<v Speaker 1>that's really not a bad one. So you stole my

0:23:39.960 --> 0:23:42.000
<v Speaker 1>over under for the day with a round. So I'll

0:23:42.000 --> 0:23:44.760
<v Speaker 1>pivot and I'll go with the and I'm gonna consider it.

0:23:44.840 --> 0:23:47.480
<v Speaker 1>I'll go with the under on the Broncos Charters game

0:23:47.480 --> 0:23:49.879
<v Speaker 1>at forty five and a half. And what this this

0:23:50.040 --> 0:23:52.240
<v Speaker 1>really boils down to a couple of days. One is

0:23:52.440 --> 0:23:54.720
<v Speaker 1>Drew Locke, who I think, I don't know if he's

0:23:54.760 --> 0:23:57.679
<v Speaker 1>officially been named the starter, but the expectation is that

0:23:57.720 --> 0:24:00.000
<v Speaker 1>he's going to start. And I understand that the charge

0:24:00.359 --> 0:24:03.600
<v Speaker 1>generally speaking, have a porous run defense. So you might

0:24:03.680 --> 0:24:07.680
<v Speaker 1>see Melvin Gordon and Javonte Williams get seventy five. They're

0:24:07.680 --> 0:24:11.080
<v Speaker 1>both limited. And you know that the Chargers defense, it

0:24:11.119 --> 0:24:12.879
<v Speaker 1>depends on the health and stuff like that. They're not

0:24:12.960 --> 0:24:16.040
<v Speaker 1>always the absolute Steve now they were obviously last week,

0:24:16.160 --> 0:24:18.880
<v Speaker 1>but they're not always the absolute, but regardless, they're limited

0:24:18.880 --> 0:24:22.720
<v Speaker 1>in either way. Like, if you are the Chargers, okay, there,

0:24:22.840 --> 0:24:26.000
<v Speaker 1>what is to prevent you from stacking the box up

0:24:26.040 --> 0:24:29.080
<v Speaker 1>the wazoo right now? Because there's just no chance that

0:24:29.200 --> 0:24:31.080
<v Speaker 1>Drew Lock is going to beat you? And there's no

0:24:31.240 --> 0:24:35.159
<v Speaker 1>chance that the Broncos want to allow Drew Lock to

0:24:35.280 --> 0:24:38.200
<v Speaker 1>be the person who decides the game. They're gonna run

0:24:38.200 --> 0:24:41.360
<v Speaker 1>it all day and again, even if they gain yard,

0:24:41.359 --> 0:24:43.800
<v Speaker 1>it's like the more you run the ball, the more

0:24:43.880 --> 0:24:46.840
<v Speaker 1>the clock bleeds. And that's just how it's gonna be necessarily.

0:24:47.000 --> 0:24:50.560
<v Speaker 1>And the Broncos defense is solid. They know the Chargers

0:24:50.560 --> 0:24:53.119
<v Speaker 1>pretty well, so I don't expect the Chargers necessarily to

0:24:53.160 --> 0:24:55.399
<v Speaker 1>go up and put up you know, a thirty spot

0:24:55.480 --> 0:24:58.639
<v Speaker 1>or anything here. But realistically, I think the Broncos with

0:24:58.720 --> 0:25:00.919
<v Speaker 1>Drew Lock. I mean, you watch that game against just

0:25:01.240 --> 0:25:04.400
<v Speaker 1>a Raiders defense that should not be able to stop anybody,

0:25:04.440 --> 0:25:07.680
<v Speaker 1>and they just couldn't do anything whatsoever. We've seen Lock

0:25:07.800 --> 0:25:09.719
<v Speaker 1>enough here, so it's more of a fate of what

0:25:09.760 --> 0:25:12.439
<v Speaker 1>we're going to see from the Broncos offense necessarily than

0:25:12.440 --> 0:25:14.840
<v Speaker 1>the Chargers. But I'll I'll lean towards the under here

0:25:14.840 --> 0:25:16.399
<v Speaker 1>at the forty five and a half. Again, if I

0:25:16.440 --> 0:25:18.439
<v Speaker 1>were going to have my pick of the litta, it

0:25:18.440 --> 0:25:20.160
<v Speaker 1>would have been the over forty six and a half

0:25:20.200 --> 0:25:25.240
<v Speaker 1>with that with the Bronx, but I lean under, So.

0:25:25.480 --> 0:25:29.080
<v Speaker 2>I'm right, I'm also taking the under in this game

0:25:29.119 --> 0:25:31.240
<v Speaker 2>because of you know, mainly the points that you just said,

0:25:31.400 --> 0:25:35.040
<v Speaker 2>I how are you trusting Drew Lock, Like I've watched

0:25:35.040 --> 0:25:38.359
<v Speaker 2>Teddy Bridgewater all year and I go, God, Drew Lock's

0:25:38.400 --> 0:25:39.159
<v Speaker 2>got to be better than this.

0:25:39.560 --> 0:25:41.040
<v Speaker 3>Watch one game of Drew Lock.

0:25:40.880 --> 0:25:43.280
<v Speaker 1>And I go, absolutely not. He is not.

0:25:43.440 --> 0:25:46.159
<v Speaker 2>Teddy Bridgewater is better, and they both are terrible. Like

0:25:46.560 --> 0:25:48.960
<v Speaker 2>this is a team that is a quarterback away. They

0:25:49.040 --> 0:25:52.199
<v Speaker 2>have good weapons and everything, but uh, you know, the

0:25:52.280 --> 0:25:55.159
<v Speaker 2>quarterback ain't there this week. So I'm absolutely with you

0:25:55.200 --> 0:25:57.560
<v Speaker 2>give me the under here because the Chargers are in

0:25:57.600 --> 0:26:00.720
<v Speaker 2>a weird funk right now. Justin Herbert could get a

0:26:00.720 --> 0:26:02.920
<v Speaker 2>lot of this, but the Denver defense is solid. You know,

0:26:03.119 --> 0:26:06.119
<v Speaker 2>I play good ball, so they're gonna limit what the

0:26:06.200 --> 0:26:08.520
<v Speaker 2>Chargers can do on offense. It's not gonna be like

0:26:08.560 --> 0:26:11.080
<v Speaker 2>playing the Texans where Justin Jackson has one hundred and

0:26:11.119 --> 0:26:13.720
<v Speaker 2>eighty yards and a touchdown and all that stuff. So

0:26:14.359 --> 0:26:16.480
<v Speaker 2>I'm with you on the under in this game, mainly

0:26:16.520 --> 0:26:19.199
<v Speaker 2>because I don't trust either offense right now, and I

0:26:19.240 --> 0:26:22.800
<v Speaker 2>do trust Denver's defense, So we're some potico as far

0:26:22.840 --> 0:26:23.520
<v Speaker 2>as that game goes.

0:26:23.560 --> 0:26:24.520
<v Speaker 3>For sure, I.

0:26:24.480 --> 0:26:26.640
<v Speaker 1>Love it all right, Well, recap at the end, but bogwan,

0:26:26.720 --> 0:26:29.119
<v Speaker 1>let's fly through the remaining spreads and just let me

0:26:29.160 --> 0:26:31.680
<v Speaker 1>know if you've got to lean one way or the other. Okay, yep,

0:26:32.640 --> 0:26:36.520
<v Speaker 1>Pats are laying sixteen to the Jaguars in New England. Uh.

0:26:36.760 --> 0:26:39.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, they haven't scored a touchdown with Trevor Lawrence for

0:26:39.600 --> 0:26:41.480
<v Speaker 2>a month, so give me the Patriots.

0:26:41.720 --> 0:26:45.440
<v Speaker 1>And I agree. I don't ever actually take these giant spreads.

0:26:45.440 --> 0:26:48.200
<v Speaker 1>But man, there's just I don't know what the spread

0:26:48.240 --> 0:26:50.280
<v Speaker 1>would have to be to get me to feel comfortable

0:26:50.359 --> 0:26:52.520
<v Speaker 1>taking the Jaguars in this game. With the Pats off

0:26:52.520 --> 0:26:55.000
<v Speaker 1>a bad loss as well, Ye, try toe of something,

0:26:55.760 --> 0:26:59.399
<v Speaker 1>all right. So we go to another big spread. Next,

0:26:59.720 --> 0:27:03.160
<v Speaker 1>the Bucks laying thirteen to the Jets in New Jersey.

0:27:03.359 --> 0:27:04.000
<v Speaker 3>I'll lay it.

0:27:04.200 --> 0:27:07.159
<v Speaker 2>The Jets have packed up and gone to gotten to

0:27:07.200 --> 0:27:09.840
<v Speaker 2>bed for the winner, so Tampa Bay wins this game.

0:27:10.320 --> 0:27:14.000
<v Speaker 1>I can't imagine, Bogman, that all of the big favorites

0:27:14.080 --> 0:27:15.919
<v Speaker 1>are going to cover, But I'm taking a.

0:27:15.880 --> 0:27:19.640
<v Speaker 3>Big versus LA for sure this week, so.

0:27:19.600 --> 0:27:21.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm still taking them though I every everything.

0:27:23.520 --> 0:27:25.240
<v Speaker 3>There's one double digit spread I will not take.

0:27:25.440 --> 0:27:27.800
<v Speaker 1>Better not be the Bills against the Falcons, because I

0:27:27.840 --> 0:27:30.600
<v Speaker 1>am taking this. Okay, I'm also with the Bucks here,

0:27:30.640 --> 0:27:33.919
<v Speaker 1>and again we are we both do fantasy rankings. I

0:27:33.920 --> 0:27:37.000
<v Speaker 1>certainly hope for my championship teams that everybody in the

0:27:37.000 --> 0:27:39.320
<v Speaker 1>Bucks decides to go nuts in this game and as

0:27:39.320 --> 0:27:40.080
<v Speaker 1>a Jets fan.

0:27:40.040 --> 0:27:44.560
<v Speaker 2>Box are hurt in the champions Ah, Mike Evans Leonard Fournette.

0:27:44.119 --> 0:27:46.280
<v Speaker 1>To me, Yeah, that is bad. But I will say

0:27:46.280 --> 0:27:48.639
<v Speaker 1>that again. You mentioned about, you know, the double whammy

0:27:48.720 --> 0:27:51.119
<v Speaker 1>when you bet you know on your team. Like a

0:27:51.200 --> 0:27:52.800
<v Speaker 1>great thing about being a Jets fan is I can

0:27:52.880 --> 0:27:55.960
<v Speaker 1>almost always confidently bet against the Jets and almost it

0:27:56.040 --> 0:27:58.640
<v Speaker 1>usually works out. Uh, the Raiders, for you.

0:27:58.560 --> 0:28:01.080
<v Speaker 2>Would be they win because you lose your money and

0:28:01.119 --> 0:28:04.040
<v Speaker 2>they lose that draft pick. So you know, it slips

0:28:04.040 --> 0:28:05.600
<v Speaker 2>a little further and further every time.

0:28:05.720 --> 0:28:09.520
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, let me tell you my friend I had

0:28:09.600 --> 0:28:11.560
<v Speaker 1>in a teaser this week because I didn't trust the

0:28:11.600 --> 0:28:13.920
<v Speaker 1>exact spread the Jaguars getting eight and a half, and

0:28:14.040 --> 0:28:18.359
<v Speaker 1>I was like, they're going to cover this spread somehow.

0:28:18.400 --> 0:28:21.560
<v Speaker 1>They're going to do this somehow and win this game.

0:28:21.600 --> 0:28:23.840
<v Speaker 1>Is carverble. They still won, which sucked for me, but

0:28:23.920 --> 0:28:27.040
<v Speaker 1>again I did thankfully when the teaser. But yeah, it's dangerous.

0:28:27.040 --> 0:28:29.920
<v Speaker 1>It's never a fun time. Raiders getting six and a

0:28:29.960 --> 0:28:33.000
<v Speaker 1>half from the Colts. We're assuming Carson Wentz comes back here.

0:28:33.119 --> 0:28:35.440
<v Speaker 1>By the way, I guess you know, with the way

0:28:35.440 --> 0:28:36.520
<v Speaker 1>it is, but what do you think.

0:28:36.680 --> 0:28:39.560
<v Speaker 2>I don't care with the way the Colts defense has

0:28:39.600 --> 0:28:43.240
<v Speaker 2>been playing and the way that the whole offense is

0:28:43.240 --> 0:28:46.320
<v Speaker 2>hand the ball to Jonathan Taylor. And I watched Sam

0:28:46.400 --> 0:28:48.280
<v Speaker 2>Aliger play a lot in college and love him and

0:28:48.320 --> 0:28:50.120
<v Speaker 2>hope he gets a start eventually, but it's going to

0:28:50.160 --> 0:28:52.520
<v Speaker 2>be Carson Wentz. So I think the Colts win this

0:28:52.560 --> 0:28:53.240
<v Speaker 2>one going away.

0:28:54.480 --> 0:28:57.760
<v Speaker 1>Eagles are visiting Washington and laying three and a half. Now, bagman,

0:28:57.840 --> 0:29:00.160
<v Speaker 1>this one strikes me as something where the books are

0:29:00.160 --> 0:29:03.000
<v Speaker 1>being like, yeah, take the Eagles. Take the Eagles, obviously,

0:29:03.120 --> 0:29:05.920
<v Speaker 1>because we are very confident in that in you doing

0:29:05.920 --> 0:29:07.120
<v Speaker 1>that right, that's what it is.

0:29:07.160 --> 0:29:10.280
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to springboard into the trap too, because Washington,

0:29:10.280 --> 0:29:13.040
<v Speaker 2>oh you are, yeah, playing that egg it really it's

0:29:13.040 --> 0:29:16.000
<v Speaker 2>for this reason. Ron Rivera and I just I don't

0:29:16.080 --> 0:29:18.000
<v Speaker 2>like it in college, and I despise it in The

0:29:18.040 --> 0:29:21.120
<v Speaker 2>pros said that Heineke's going to start, but Kyle Allen's

0:29:21.160 --> 0:29:24.000
<v Speaker 2>going to get time. Break up that offensive rhythm. I

0:29:24.040 --> 0:29:26.240
<v Speaker 2>don't care who you are, you can't do that in

0:29:26.400 --> 0:29:30.640
<v Speaker 2>a in any game, so especially a home game against

0:29:30.680 --> 0:29:33.280
<v Speaker 2>the division rivals. So you're showing that you have no

0:29:33.280 --> 0:29:35.200
<v Speaker 2>confidence in either one of these guys that were fist

0:29:35.240 --> 0:29:38.000
<v Speaker 2>fighting on the sideline last week. Oh yeah, Washington is

0:29:38.040 --> 0:29:39.600
<v Speaker 2>a sinking ship right now. So give me Philly.

0:29:40.080 --> 0:29:42.760
<v Speaker 1>I know, man, they and the books want you to

0:29:42.800 --> 0:29:46.520
<v Speaker 1>do that, right like they do. Who what normal better

0:29:46.560 --> 0:29:49.520
<v Speaker 1>looks at this line and business, You know what, gimme Washington.

0:29:49.640 --> 0:29:51.880
<v Speaker 1>I feel like nobody is going to do that, and

0:29:51.960 --> 0:29:53.640
<v Speaker 1>they're just laying it out there for it. But you're

0:29:53.680 --> 0:29:54.600
<v Speaker 1>walking into it. Huh.

0:29:54.640 --> 0:29:56.960
<v Speaker 2>I'm walking right into it. And if it snaps me up,

0:29:56.960 --> 0:29:58.480
<v Speaker 2>it snaps me up, I'll take the Bay.

0:29:58.800 --> 0:30:00.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm coming with you. Don't worry about all right? All right?

0:30:01.000 --> 0:30:03.040
<v Speaker 1>All right? Is this the one bogwin Bills at home

0:30:03.120 --> 0:30:04.920
<v Speaker 1>laying fourteen and a half against Falcons.

0:30:05.080 --> 0:30:06.640
<v Speaker 3>No, I'm taking the Bills in this game. They need

0:30:06.680 --> 0:30:06.960
<v Speaker 3>to win.

0:30:07.040 --> 0:30:10.600
<v Speaker 2>They need to keep New England at Bay, Miami at

0:30:10.640 --> 0:30:13.080
<v Speaker 2>Bay right now. They need to lock up this division,

0:30:13.120 --> 0:30:15.200
<v Speaker 2>and you got to give this offense and the defense

0:30:15.240 --> 0:30:18.280
<v Speaker 2>a little bit of confidence moving into towards the playoffs.

0:30:18.280 --> 0:30:21.000
<v Speaker 2>So I think they blow out the Falcons. Another team

0:30:21.000 --> 0:30:24.080
<v Speaker 2>that's just why is coudrel Patterson not on the field

0:30:24.120 --> 0:30:24.600
<v Speaker 2>every snap.

0:30:24.640 --> 0:30:25.560
<v Speaker 3>I don't understand it.

0:30:26.480 --> 0:30:30.040
<v Speaker 2>You know, Kyle Pitts has been okay, they misuse Mike

0:30:30.120 --> 0:30:32.200
<v Speaker 2>Davis the whole year, and he's also not as good

0:30:32.240 --> 0:30:33.120
<v Speaker 2>as he was last year.

0:30:33.400 --> 0:30:35.400
<v Speaker 3>So this team is a big mess.

0:30:35.280 --> 0:30:37.680
<v Speaker 2>Right now, specifically on defense, and Josh Allen's going to

0:30:37.720 --> 0:30:39.200
<v Speaker 2>pick him apart totally.

0:30:39.200 --> 0:30:42.760
<v Speaker 1>With you Chiefs playing five to the Bengals in CINCI, I.

0:30:42.720 --> 0:30:45.160
<v Speaker 2>Mean this is mainly I want to see it, so

0:30:45.320 --> 0:30:48.320
<v Speaker 2>I am taking the Chiefs. But also the Chiefs being

0:30:48.360 --> 0:30:51.520
<v Speaker 2>able to adjust their offense to play against certain defenses

0:30:51.560 --> 0:30:54.120
<v Speaker 2>instead of just throw the ball down field has been

0:30:54.480 --> 0:30:57.360
<v Speaker 2>kind of scary to watch this year, and specifically for

0:30:57.440 --> 0:31:00.640
<v Speaker 2>me last week when I was on instagram sending piece

0:31:00.680 --> 0:31:02.400
<v Speaker 2>of p a bunch of reels instead of watching the

0:31:02.440 --> 0:31:04.640
<v Speaker 2>second half of my game because it's just hurt to

0:31:04.680 --> 0:31:07.120
<v Speaker 2>watch every play they were doing something wrong on So

0:31:07.680 --> 0:31:10.680
<v Speaker 2>you know, I think that they go into the jungle

0:31:10.880 --> 0:31:13.880
<v Speaker 2>and we get escalator of sadness leaving it for the Bengals,

0:31:13.880 --> 0:31:16.800
<v Speaker 2>which is something I love. So give me the Chiefs

0:31:16.840 --> 0:31:17.640
<v Speaker 2>and I'll lay the points.

0:31:18.000 --> 0:31:19.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm with you as well, and it's just it's got

0:31:19.880 --> 0:31:21.960
<v Speaker 1>to be a letdown spot man like for the Bengals

0:31:22.000 --> 0:31:26.240
<v Speaker 1>coming in here off that huge enormous win over the Ravens.

0:31:26.360 --> 0:31:28.040
<v Speaker 1>I just I agree. I think the Chiefs come in,

0:31:28.080 --> 0:31:30.360
<v Speaker 1>I think they win handily. Giants are visiting the Bears.

0:31:30.360 --> 0:31:32.000
<v Speaker 1>Bears are laying six points.

0:31:32.240 --> 0:31:33.880
<v Speaker 3>I mean, I hate this game. I don't have a

0:31:33.960 --> 0:31:34.640
<v Speaker 3>lean either way.

0:31:34.720 --> 0:31:36.960
<v Speaker 2>I'll take the Giants because I don't trust the Bears

0:31:36.960 --> 0:31:40.000
<v Speaker 2>to beat anybody by six. But this is a which

0:31:40.040 --> 0:31:43.320
<v Speaker 2>coach gets fired first ball. As far as I'm concerned,

0:31:43.440 --> 0:31:46.120
<v Speaker 2>I hope it's Joe Judge. I hate this Jake from

0:31:46.120 --> 0:31:48.200
<v Speaker 2>and Mike Glennon nonsense. I hate that he hasn't used

0:31:48.240 --> 0:31:51.880
<v Speaker 2>Saquon Barkley properly. You signed Kenny Galladay, give him no

0:31:52.000 --> 0:31:55.600
<v Speaker 2>confidence moving forward. You have good offensive weapons and they're

0:31:55.640 --> 0:31:59.600
<v Speaker 2>all terrible this year. So I think I like Joe

0:31:59.680 --> 0:32:02.200
<v Speaker 2>Judge less than I. If I had to pick one

0:32:02.240 --> 0:32:04.240
<v Speaker 2>to be head coach of my team, I picked Naggy

0:32:04.520 --> 0:32:07.320
<v Speaker 2>all day, every day over Joe Judge.

0:32:07.360 --> 0:32:09.640
<v Speaker 3>But I don't trust the bearst be anybody by that

0:32:09.720 --> 0:32:10.240
<v Speaker 3>many points.

0:32:10.280 --> 0:32:13.400
<v Speaker 1>So give me the Giants, bagman. If you gave me

0:32:13.440 --> 0:32:15.840
<v Speaker 1>your money and said please bet on this game, I

0:32:15.840 --> 0:32:19.000
<v Speaker 1>would still decline because I just have absolutely like I

0:32:19.040 --> 0:32:21.040
<v Speaker 1>can't even imagine. I don't want to watch it. I

0:32:21.080 --> 0:32:23.000
<v Speaker 1>don't want to bet on it. I have no idea

0:32:23.000 --> 0:32:25.680
<v Speaker 1>what's gonna happen. Like it's like the first game the

0:32:25.680 --> 0:32:28.120
<v Speaker 1>whole year where I'm like, holy cow, please just let

0:32:28.160 --> 0:32:29.720
<v Speaker 1>me get know. It's not gonna be the game.

0:32:29.560 --> 0:32:31.280
<v Speaker 3>Where they go to it on the red zone. I'm like, ugh,

0:32:31.560 --> 0:32:32.680
<v Speaker 3>go to anything else.

0:32:33.680 --> 0:32:36.080
<v Speaker 1>Literally, any other game show me or replay.

0:32:36.280 --> 0:32:38.480
<v Speaker 3>How about that, show me Jags. I'd rather watch the

0:32:38.560 --> 0:32:39.080
<v Speaker 3>Jags in this.

0:32:39.160 --> 0:32:42.280
<v Speaker 1>Let's go. The Chargers, as we talked about, are at home.

0:32:42.320 --> 0:32:44.120
<v Speaker 1>They're laying six and a half here to the Broncos.

0:32:44.160 --> 0:32:44.840
<v Speaker 1>How about the spread.

0:32:45.000 --> 0:32:46.959
<v Speaker 2>I'd taken the Chargers because they're at home and they

0:32:47.040 --> 0:32:50.200
<v Speaker 2>just got embarrassed. They have to win, so I'm taking them,

0:32:50.520 --> 0:32:53.239
<v Speaker 2>and Drew Lock sucks. I mean that's, you know, not

0:32:53.280 --> 0:32:55.080
<v Speaker 2>with confidence, but I will take them.

0:32:55.520 --> 0:32:57.320
<v Speaker 1>I agree, I would take them as well. Again, I

0:32:57.400 --> 0:33:00.800
<v Speaker 1>just can't like it was really I felt discussing backing

0:33:00.840 --> 0:33:03.720
<v Speaker 1>the Raiders last week, but I was like, I don't care.

0:33:03.800 --> 0:33:06.320
<v Speaker 1>It's true, Locke, It's a very easy formula and it

0:33:06.360 --> 0:33:09.240
<v Speaker 1>did work out. Is this the spread Bogwin. The forty

0:33:09.320 --> 0:33:11.680
<v Speaker 1>nine Ers laying twelve and a half to the Texans.

0:33:11.280 --> 0:33:13.320
<v Speaker 2>Is the one that's the one right there, and it's

0:33:13.320 --> 0:33:15.280
<v Speaker 2>because I just don't trust you know, it seems like

0:33:15.320 --> 0:33:17.239
<v Speaker 2>Trey Lance is going to start this game and I

0:33:17.280 --> 0:33:21.320
<v Speaker 2>just don't trust them. And look, Houston is playing decent football.

0:33:21.320 --> 0:33:22.400
<v Speaker 2>I'm not going to sit here and tell you they're

0:33:22.400 --> 0:33:24.920
<v Speaker 2>playing good football because they're not. But they're playing decent

0:33:24.960 --> 0:33:27.080
<v Speaker 2>football right now, which is not something I expected to

0:33:27.120 --> 0:33:29.840
<v Speaker 2>say into a microphone after watching them for the first

0:33:29.880 --> 0:33:30.600
<v Speaker 2>month of the season.

0:33:30.680 --> 0:33:31.680
<v Speaker 3>They have been terrible.

0:33:31.920 --> 0:33:34.680
<v Speaker 2>But you know, Culley's got these guys playing at least hard,

0:33:34.760 --> 0:33:36.840
<v Speaker 2>and Mills is going to be their answer next year too.

0:33:36.920 --> 0:33:40.320
<v Speaker 2>So let's get Nico Collins involve. Brandon Cooks is fine.

0:33:40.360 --> 0:33:43.040
<v Speaker 2>Rex Burkhead had a huge game last week too, right,

0:33:43.160 --> 0:33:47.080
<v Speaker 2>So it's if this was Jimmy g at full health,

0:33:47.320 --> 0:33:49.120
<v Speaker 2>I would take the Niners and lay the points. But

0:33:49.120 --> 0:33:51.000
<v Speaker 2>it's Trey Lance, and I just don't know what to

0:33:51.080 --> 0:33:53.680
<v Speaker 2>expect from him. I would expect him to be better,

0:33:54.280 --> 0:33:57.120
<v Speaker 2>but I would be shocked if he was worse. You know,

0:33:57.200 --> 0:34:00.680
<v Speaker 2>he's running scout team this whole time, So give me

0:34:01.280 --> 0:34:04.040
<v Speaker 2>Houston in this game without.

0:34:03.760 --> 0:34:04.480
<v Speaker 3>A ton of confidence.

0:34:04.480 --> 0:34:06.040
<v Speaker 2>I just don't think the Niners with Tree Lance can

0:34:06.080 --> 0:34:07.600
<v Speaker 2>be in anybody by double digits.

0:34:08.120 --> 0:34:10.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think that's right. I'm not going to bet it,

0:34:10.640 --> 0:34:12.920
<v Speaker 1>but it definitely strikes me as something where Look, I've

0:34:12.920 --> 0:34:15.879
<v Speaker 1>been impressed with Mills just more because I had such

0:34:15.960 --> 0:34:18.360
<v Speaker 1>low expectations for the guy coming in, but there have

0:34:18.360 --> 0:34:20.919
<v Speaker 1>been a lot of times where I've seen him playing games.

0:34:20.960 --> 0:34:23.720
<v Speaker 1>It's not just against the Chargers, but generally speaking.

0:34:23.360 --> 0:34:25.640
<v Speaker 2>He's gonna be So this is kind of annoying for

0:34:25.840 --> 0:34:28.000
<v Speaker 2>draft stuff, but of course this is where my brain goes.

0:34:28.960 --> 0:34:31.799
<v Speaker 2>He was a five star, number one overall QB prospect

0:34:32.040 --> 0:34:33.920
<v Speaker 2>when he came out of high school and he went

0:34:33.960 --> 0:34:37.600
<v Speaker 2>to Stanford and really didn't do anything at Stanford, still

0:34:37.640 --> 0:34:39.880
<v Speaker 2>gets drafted because he has all these great measurables and

0:34:39.920 --> 0:34:42.080
<v Speaker 2>he was a five star and now he's having success

0:34:42.120 --> 0:34:44.359
<v Speaker 2>in the NFL. It's going to make those five star

0:34:44.440 --> 0:34:48.239
<v Speaker 2>guys that don't do a lot in college still draftable

0:34:48.280 --> 0:34:51.399
<v Speaker 2>at the end of the draft. So you know, even

0:34:51.440 --> 0:34:54.360
<v Speaker 2>if Spencer Rattler has a crappy year at South Carolina

0:34:54.360 --> 0:34:56.680
<v Speaker 2>and he's probably still going to get drafted because people

0:34:56.719 --> 0:35:00.600
<v Speaker 2>see the pedigree of these guys, so less for him

0:35:00.600 --> 0:35:03.200
<v Speaker 2>because he's not as tall, but still gonna get drafted.

0:35:03.760 --> 0:35:07.719
<v Speaker 1>Great point by when Cowboys are home link six to

0:35:07.800 --> 0:35:09.120
<v Speaker 1>the Cards, what do you think?

0:35:09.520 --> 0:35:11.719
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I'm gonna take Dallas here. I think what we

0:35:11.800 --> 0:35:15.040
<v Speaker 2>saw last week from them was just the get right game.

0:35:15.080 --> 0:35:17.480
<v Speaker 2>They needed it too, because Dak had been struggling pretty

0:35:17.480 --> 0:35:19.400
<v Speaker 2>bad for like the last three or four weeks before

0:35:19.440 --> 0:35:24.440
<v Speaker 2>this game. But you know, coming at home against Washington,

0:35:24.480 --> 0:35:27.360
<v Speaker 2>who had been playing pretty well up to that point,

0:35:27.560 --> 0:35:30.399
<v Speaker 2>it all clicked. So they're kind of peaking right now.

0:35:30.640 --> 0:35:33.560
<v Speaker 2>Cardinals are the opposite. They peaked a little bit earlier

0:35:33.560 --> 0:35:36.040
<v Speaker 2>in the season. This is typical Cliff Kingsbury. What you

0:35:36.120 --> 0:35:39.280
<v Speaker 2>see in a game or a season is a second

0:35:39.320 --> 0:35:43.560
<v Speaker 2>half collapse from him because he doesn't adjust. So I

0:35:43.960 --> 0:35:46.440
<v Speaker 2>never have like Cliff Kingsbury as head coach in the NFL.

0:35:46.719 --> 0:35:49.319
<v Speaker 2>I think he is skated by on tons and tons

0:35:49.360 --> 0:35:52.720
<v Speaker 2>of talent on this Cardinals roster, which he helped put together.

0:35:52.880 --> 0:35:55.800
<v Speaker 2>So look, guy's got an eye for talent for sure,

0:35:56.120 --> 0:35:59.600
<v Speaker 2>but I just don't trust him to coach up these guys.

0:35:59.640 --> 0:36:01.160
<v Speaker 3>In the and a half against Dallas.

0:36:01.320 --> 0:36:03.839
<v Speaker 2>I think they will make all of the proper adjustments

0:36:03.880 --> 0:36:04.760
<v Speaker 2>and win going away.

0:36:05.360 --> 0:36:07.880
<v Speaker 1>Fading Cliff Kingsbury in the second half of any season

0:36:08.000 --> 0:36:12.399
<v Speaker 1>is almost always profitable our game, and they just look

0:36:12.480 --> 0:36:16.080
<v Speaker 1>lost without Hopkins. They just they look like they've.

0:36:15.920 --> 0:36:19.160
<v Speaker 2>Made or whatever really strong for them when Edmunds went

0:36:19.200 --> 0:36:21.799
<v Speaker 2>down and Hopkins was out, And he's probably not gonna

0:36:21.800 --> 0:36:24.440
<v Speaker 2>play in this game either, So Chase Edmonds is okay,

0:36:24.480 --> 0:36:25.400
<v Speaker 2>but he's not Connor.

0:36:25.680 --> 0:36:27.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, he's a game time decision, so he'll probably be

0:36:27.680 --> 0:36:30.720
<v Speaker 1>limited even if he does go. How about again, you said,

0:36:30.840 --> 0:36:32.960
<v Speaker 1>sounded like you weren't positive on it, but sounds like

0:36:33.000 --> 0:36:34.920
<v Speaker 1>you like the Lions if you had to go one

0:36:34.960 --> 0:36:36.680
<v Speaker 1>way getting the seven from the Seahawks.

0:36:36.920 --> 0:36:39.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, the covering machines, man, The Lions are one of

0:36:39.840 --> 0:36:43.120
<v Speaker 2>the best teams against the spread in the league this year.

0:36:43.400 --> 0:36:46.680
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I think the Packers are better. The Cowboys

0:36:46.680 --> 0:36:48.879
<v Speaker 2>are twelve and three, Packers eleven and four, Colts ten

0:36:48.920 --> 0:36:52.600
<v Speaker 2>and five, Detroit ten and five against the spread. So,

0:36:53.080 --> 0:36:55.360
<v Speaker 2>like I said, I like the over the most in

0:36:55.400 --> 0:36:58.040
<v Speaker 2>this game, but picking against the spread, I will definitely

0:36:58.080 --> 0:37:00.600
<v Speaker 2>take the Lions plus points in pretty much any game

0:37:00.680 --> 0:37:01.000
<v Speaker 2>right now.

0:37:01.560 --> 0:37:03.919
<v Speaker 1>Fame that felt the same way when Pat again took

0:37:03.960 --> 0:37:06.560
<v Speaker 1>that Seahawks getting six and a half, you know, giving

0:37:06.600 --> 0:37:08.279
<v Speaker 1>six and a half to the Bears, It's like, I

0:37:08.280 --> 0:37:10.960
<v Speaker 1>don't trust the Seahawks at this point to cover you know,

0:37:11.080 --> 0:37:12.280
<v Speaker 1>six and a half against anyone.

0:37:12.560 --> 0:37:14.279
<v Speaker 3>It's kind of the Bears thing for me too.

0:37:14.360 --> 0:37:18.360
<v Speaker 2>It's like these teams are they're probably six points better

0:37:18.480 --> 0:37:21.239
<v Speaker 2>than the team they're playing, but are you gonna bet

0:37:21.280 --> 0:37:22.160
<v Speaker 2>your money on it?

0:37:22.920 --> 0:37:23.120
<v Speaker 1>No?

0:37:23.200 --> 0:37:23.680
<v Speaker 3>Thanks?

0:37:24.000 --> 0:37:26.360
<v Speaker 1>Right? All right? Saints slaying six and a half to

0:37:26.480 --> 0:37:29.080
<v Speaker 1>the Panthers. Eanbook will not be starting in this game.

0:37:29.160 --> 0:37:31.600
<v Speaker 1>Sam Donald will be though for the Panthers. So not

0:37:31.640 --> 0:37:32.200
<v Speaker 1>sure what that does.

0:37:32.239 --> 0:37:36.200
<v Speaker 2>What do you think I mean, Matt Ruhle has messed

0:37:36.200 --> 0:37:38.040
<v Speaker 2>this up, is the nice way to say it.

0:37:38.120 --> 0:37:38.239
<v Speaker 1>So.

0:37:39.280 --> 0:37:41.920
<v Speaker 2>I think that firing Joe Brady was a mistake. I

0:37:42.000 --> 0:37:44.400
<v Speaker 2>think signing Cam Newton was a mistake. I would have

0:37:44.400 --> 0:37:46.200
<v Speaker 2>stuck with Sam Donald or just gone a p J

0:37:46.360 --> 0:37:49.279
<v Speaker 2>Walker for a year and know these guys aren't my

0:37:49.360 --> 0:37:52.080
<v Speaker 2>answer now. I don't know, Sam Donald might still be

0:37:52.120 --> 0:37:54.359
<v Speaker 2>your answer for next year. So it's a mess there.

0:37:54.480 --> 0:37:56.680
<v Speaker 2>Give me New Orleans. Carolina has packed it in for

0:37:56.719 --> 0:37:57.120
<v Speaker 2>the winner.

0:37:57.520 --> 0:38:00.279
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I'm in agreement with you. And last one wrong

0:38:00.360 --> 0:38:02.080
<v Speaker 1>for New Orleans suis Oh yeah for real.

0:38:02.680 --> 0:38:05.840
<v Speaker 2>Ever since Cam Jordan started getting to the quarterback again,

0:38:06.080 --> 0:38:07.640
<v Speaker 2>that defense picked way up.

0:38:07.960 --> 0:38:12.520
<v Speaker 1>So total agreement. Last one, Vikings are visiting the Packers

0:38:12.560 --> 0:38:14.360
<v Speaker 1>Sunday Night football. Seven points.

0:38:14.440 --> 0:38:16.720
<v Speaker 2>What do you think Packers win this one going away

0:38:16.760 --> 0:38:19.040
<v Speaker 2>and lock up home field advantage so they can sit

0:38:19.120 --> 0:38:21.160
<v Speaker 2>Aaron Rodgers in his COVID toe next week.

0:38:22.200 --> 0:38:25.080
<v Speaker 1>What gets me a little confused is that the two

0:38:25.120 --> 0:38:29.880
<v Speaker 1>teams realistically aren't quite as different, like in terms of

0:38:29.920 --> 0:38:33.560
<v Speaker 1>how good they are. But like, this is a Kirk

0:38:33.640 --> 0:38:38.320
<v Speaker 1>Cousins in primetime game, in time.

0:38:37.960 --> 0:38:40.120
<v Speaker 2>Game, did he throw eighty seven yards and they still

0:38:40.120 --> 0:38:40.840
<v Speaker 2>beat the Packers?

0:38:41.160 --> 0:38:43.319
<v Speaker 1>Yeah? He did not look good. Yeah, And again this

0:38:43.400 --> 0:38:45.279
<v Speaker 1>is the chance for the Packers to just put this

0:38:45.360 --> 0:38:48.520
<v Speaker 1>away and rest. So I'm probably not going near just

0:38:48.560 --> 0:38:50.359
<v Speaker 1>at seven, but if i were to go one way

0:38:50.440 --> 0:38:52.879
<v Speaker 1>or the other, I would probably go there. Bodwin, thank

0:38:52.920 --> 0:38:54.920
<v Speaker 1>you so much for having me. It was great to

0:38:54.960 --> 0:38:57.319
<v Speaker 1>have you remind remind everybody of the three bats, by

0:38:57.320 --> 0:39:00.760
<v Speaker 1>the way, that that's what it is, the recapt.

0:38:59.840 --> 0:39:03.080
<v Speaker 2>The the Rams. I'm laying the three and a half

0:39:03.120 --> 0:39:04.719
<v Speaker 2>for them. I got the over in that game of

0:39:04.760 --> 0:39:07.040
<v Speaker 2>forty six and a half against Baltimore as well, and

0:39:07.040 --> 0:39:09.280
<v Speaker 2>then the over forty two and a half in Seattle

0:39:09.320 --> 0:39:10.560
<v Speaker 2>in Detroit, and.

0:39:10.520 --> 0:39:12.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to take the Steelers getting three and a

0:39:12.480 --> 0:39:15.360
<v Speaker 1>half from the Browns, the Titans laying three and a

0:39:15.400 --> 0:39:18.560
<v Speaker 1>half to the Dolphins, and the under forty five and

0:39:18.600 --> 0:39:20.600
<v Speaker 1>a half in the Broncos in the Charters game, though

0:39:20.600 --> 0:39:22.960
<v Speaker 1>I admit that if I had my drothers, I would

0:39:23.000 --> 0:39:26.560
<v Speaker 1>also jump on the Rams and the Ravens over forty

0:39:26.560 --> 0:39:28.520
<v Speaker 1>six and a half. Bob Win, just remind everybody where

0:39:28.520 --> 0:39:29.960
<v Speaker 1>they can find more. Are you and your work?

0:39:30.320 --> 0:39:32.319
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, thank you so much for having me again, Dan,

0:39:32.440 --> 0:39:34.279
<v Speaker 2>This is this show is a lot of fun and

0:39:34.640 --> 0:39:37.120
<v Speaker 2>you can find me here on Betting Pros. I do

0:39:37.239 --> 0:39:39.879
<v Speaker 2>the college Football betting show with Joe Pizzapia and we'll

0:39:39.880 --> 0:39:42.319
<v Speaker 2>be back to the National Championship game next week.

0:39:42.360 --> 0:39:44.080
<v Speaker 3>Don't know who it is yet because we have those

0:39:44.120 --> 0:39:46.600
<v Speaker 3>games coming up tomorrow. I think it's gonna be Bama

0:39:46.600 --> 0:39:47.279
<v Speaker 3>in George right again.

0:39:48.000 --> 0:39:49.960
<v Speaker 2>We'll see, but you could catch me there obviously. I

0:39:50.000 --> 0:39:52.520
<v Speaker 2>do the I did the IDP show with him this

0:39:52.600 --> 0:39:54.640
<v Speaker 2>year as well. For Fantasy Pros. I do all my

0:39:54.680 --> 0:39:57.240
<v Speaker 2>stuff at in this league. I have the Individual Defensive

0:39:57.239 --> 0:40:00.480
<v Speaker 2>podcast there. I have Fantasy Football with Chris Well, Fantasy

0:40:00.520 --> 0:40:03.799
<v Speaker 2>Baseball Chris Welsh. He has Prospect One. I do a

0:40:03.880 --> 0:40:06.880
<v Speaker 2>DFS for Line Star as well. So see if be

0:40:06.920 --> 0:40:09.680
<v Speaker 2>winning edge with my buddy Nick Allen, I am. You

0:40:09.719 --> 0:40:11.640
<v Speaker 2>can hear my voice a lot if you like it.

0:40:11.640 --> 0:40:13.720
<v Speaker 2>It's all over the place. So if you like sports

0:40:13.719 --> 0:40:16.799
<v Speaker 2>in my voice, it's available for you, that's for sure.

0:40:17.440 --> 0:40:20.960
<v Speaker 1>Legitimately, everywhere is where Bagman is, and he does great work.

0:40:21.280 --> 0:40:25.040
<v Speaker 1>And I don't understand how he knows everything about like

0:40:25.239 --> 0:40:27.960
<v Speaker 1>every college football player in the world, considering we're constantly

0:40:28.000 --> 0:40:31.239
<v Speaker 1>this baseball football doesn't matter. The guy's a stud, all right.

0:40:31.239 --> 0:40:33.239
<v Speaker 1>I appreciate you joining me. So that's gonna do it

0:40:33.280 --> 0:40:35.479
<v Speaker 1>for this one. We'll be back as always next week

0:40:35.520 --> 0:40:38.839
<v Speaker 1>talking more NFL football. I'll be talking college football, and

0:40:39.000 --> 0:40:39.920
<v Speaker 1>I will talk to you though,