WEBVTT - Bloomberg Businessweek Weekend - October 24th, 2025

0:00:00.280 --> 0:00:07.240
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio News.

0:00:08.640 --> 0:00:13.000
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg Business Week Daily reporting from the magazine

0:00:13.000 --> 0:00:17.599
<v Speaker 2>that helps global leaders stay ahead with insight on the people, companies,

0:00:17.640 --> 0:00:22.520
<v Speaker 2>and trends shaping today's complex economy, plus global business finance

0:00:22.560 --> 0:00:26.280
<v Speaker 2>and tech news as it happens. The Bloomberg Business Weekdaily

0:00:26.400 --> 0:00:31.320
<v Speaker 2>Podcast with Carol Masser and Tim Stenebek on Bloomberg Radio.

0:00:32.000 --> 0:00:35.520
<v Speaker 3>Hi, everyone, welcome to the Bloomberg Business Weekend Podcast. After

0:00:35.560 --> 0:00:38.240
<v Speaker 3>another non stop week full of earnings from the likes

0:00:38.240 --> 0:00:42.680
<v Speaker 3>of Netflix, Tesla, Intel, GM and many many others, we

0:00:42.720 --> 0:00:45.520
<v Speaker 3>also had a twenty billion dollar currency swap deal between

0:00:45.520 --> 0:00:48.519
<v Speaker 3>the United States and Argentina, We had US sanctions on

0:00:48.600 --> 0:00:51.839
<v Speaker 3>Russian oil giants, and then gosh, I forgot this was

0:00:51.880 --> 0:00:54.040
<v Speaker 3>early in the week. A big media company, Warner Brothers

0:00:54.080 --> 0:00:55.800
<v Speaker 3>Discovery in play big time.

0:00:56.040 --> 0:00:59.080
<v Speaker 1>I think it's fair to call this a mega busy week,

0:00:59.360 --> 0:01:00.800
<v Speaker 1>and I don't to get ahead.

0:01:00.560 --> 0:01:03.360
<v Speaker 3>Of ourselves capitals, capital letters on all of.

0:01:03.320 --> 0:01:05.080
<v Speaker 1>It, but we should get used to it because next

0:01:05.080 --> 0:01:08.280
<v Speaker 1>week is going to be really busy too. I know, right, Okay,

0:01:08.880 --> 0:01:09.240
<v Speaker 1>We're going.

0:01:09.240 --> 0:01:09.840
<v Speaker 4>To keep it here.

0:01:09.880 --> 0:01:11.280
<v Speaker 1>We're going to keep it on what happened over the

0:01:11.360 --> 0:01:15.000
<v Speaker 1>past week Our highlights for the weekend, explaining that deal

0:01:15.080 --> 0:01:18.720
<v Speaker 1>between the United States and Argentina, the why, the why now,

0:01:18.800 --> 0:01:20.840
<v Speaker 1>and why that country. We're going to get all of

0:01:20.840 --> 0:01:22.320
<v Speaker 1>that and more in just a moment.

0:01:22.800 --> 0:01:27.200
<v Speaker 3>Also President Trump's move backing off of an isolated United States.

0:01:27.240 --> 0:01:29.160
<v Speaker 3>It does feel like this is kind of going on.

0:01:30.000 --> 0:01:32.840
<v Speaker 3>It's all in a rare Earth's deal with Australia to

0:01:32.920 --> 0:01:35.800
<v Speaker 3>fight China. This was kind of one of the first

0:01:35.800 --> 0:01:38.000
<v Speaker 3>big moves that someone pointed out that maybe the US

0:01:38.040 --> 0:01:39.119
<v Speaker 3>isn't going to go it alone here.

0:01:39.560 --> 0:01:42.560
<v Speaker 1>And speaking of the President, we've got his top antagonist.

0:01:42.680 --> 0:01:44.800
<v Speaker 1>It is the cover story of the latest issue of

0:01:44.840 --> 0:01:46.600
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg BusinessWeek magazine.

0:01:46.600 --> 0:01:49.840
<v Speaker 3>Plus in our second hour, Amazon Robotics chief technologist on

0:01:49.960 --> 0:01:52.960
<v Speaker 3>robots in the workforce of tomorrow, Cheat Coats on how

0:01:53.000 --> 0:01:56.360
<v Speaker 3>to improve your overall wellness totally into that and Tim Yes,

0:01:56.600 --> 0:01:59.880
<v Speaker 3>we know we're all about generative and agentic AI LM's,

0:02:00.040 --> 0:02:03.320
<v Speaker 3>but a lot is happening when it comes to quantum computing.

0:02:04.000 --> 0:02:05.840
<v Speaker 3>Just asked the mayor of Chattanooga, Tennessee.

0:02:05.880 --> 0:02:06.240
<v Speaker 5>We did.

0:02:06.640 --> 0:02:08.760
<v Speaker 3>That's all happening. In our second hour.

0:02:08.960 --> 0:02:11.520
<v Speaker 1>We begin with an agreement signed this past week by

0:02:11.520 --> 0:02:15.359
<v Speaker 1>the US Treasury with the Central Bank of Argentina. US

0:02:15.440 --> 0:02:19.400
<v Speaker 1>Secretary of the Treasury Scott Bessant characterized the Treasury's twenty

0:02:19.560 --> 0:02:22.560
<v Speaker 1>billion dollar swap line with the crisis pro nation's central

0:02:22.560 --> 0:02:27.079
<v Speaker 1>bank as a quote economic stabilization deal, an agreement that is,

0:02:27.160 --> 0:02:30.240
<v Speaker 1>quote a bridge to a better economic future for Argentina,

0:02:30.800 --> 0:02:34.160
<v Speaker 1>not a bailout. We had so many questions about this,

0:02:34.639 --> 0:02:36.720
<v Speaker 1>and there was really one voice we wanted to turn to.

0:02:37.160 --> 0:02:41.400
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg New Economy editorial director Eric Shatzker. He's covered numerous

0:02:41.480 --> 0:02:45.680
<v Speaker 1>global financial and market cycles. He's interviewed various Latin American leaders,

0:02:45.720 --> 0:02:51.680
<v Speaker 1>including Venezuelan President Nicholas Maduro and former Argentinian President Mauricio Macri.

0:02:52.320 --> 0:02:54.960
<v Speaker 1>Eric also had the September cover story on Secretary Scott

0:02:55.000 --> 0:02:56.760
<v Speaker 1>Bessant for Bloomberg BusinessWeek.

0:02:56.919 --> 0:02:59.280
<v Speaker 6>I think we can unpack this in three ways. One

0:02:59.360 --> 0:03:02.720
<v Speaker 6>is why is the US doing this? The second is

0:03:02.919 --> 0:03:07.000
<v Speaker 6>what exactly have we got here? And the third would

0:03:07.040 --> 0:03:11.799
<v Speaker 6>be how might it all end? Perhaps in tears. I'll

0:03:11.800 --> 0:03:14.640
<v Speaker 6>take on the why. And this actually goes back to

0:03:14.720 --> 0:03:17.079
<v Speaker 6>that story you mentioned that I did about Scott bessen

0:03:17.160 --> 0:03:21.080
<v Speaker 6>the Treasury Secretary for Bloomberg Business Week in September. I

0:03:21.120 --> 0:03:24.560
<v Speaker 6>spoke to the Treasury Secretary back in late July, and

0:03:24.639 --> 0:03:27.600
<v Speaker 6>at the time he told me that one of his

0:03:27.800 --> 0:03:31.960
<v Speaker 6>overarching goals in office as the Secretary of the Treasury

0:03:32.080 --> 0:03:35.640
<v Speaker 6>was to quote unquote lock in dollar supremacy. And I

0:03:35.720 --> 0:03:39.040
<v Speaker 6>asked him, well, how do you do that? And he said,

0:03:39.120 --> 0:03:42.520
<v Speaker 6>and I didn't appreciate the significance of it at the time,

0:03:43.440 --> 0:03:47.920
<v Speaker 6>was by facilitating swaps through the Treasury Department, as opposed

0:03:48.000 --> 0:03:51.120
<v Speaker 6>to the way that swaps have traditionally been facilitated, which

0:03:51.160 --> 0:03:54.560
<v Speaker 6>is by the FED from central bank to central bank.

0:03:54.560 --> 0:03:57.640
<v Speaker 6>Now there is precedent for this. The Treasury Department did

0:03:57.640 --> 0:04:01.200
<v Speaker 6>that from Mexico back in the mid nineties the Peso crisis,

0:04:01.720 --> 0:04:05.240
<v Speaker 6>and it helped, and maybe it'll help Argentina. But it

0:04:05.320 --> 0:04:11.000
<v Speaker 6>appears that under the Trump administration, the government's focus is

0:04:11.080 --> 0:04:13.480
<v Speaker 6>on again cuts to the why. It's not just about

0:04:13.480 --> 0:04:17.080
<v Speaker 6>locking in dollar supremacy. It's using the dollar as an

0:04:17.120 --> 0:04:21.480
<v Speaker 6>economic tool to support countries with which the United States

0:04:21.480 --> 0:04:24.919
<v Speaker 6>feel it has some kind of ideological kinship or some

0:04:25.120 --> 0:04:28.560
<v Speaker 6>kind of trading relationship. It's not like Argentina has been

0:04:28.560 --> 0:04:30.840
<v Speaker 6>one of America's major trading partners.

0:04:30.880 --> 0:04:31.400
<v Speaker 4>It has not.

0:04:32.560 --> 0:04:34.960
<v Speaker 6>The amount of bilateral trade that goes on between those

0:04:34.960 --> 0:04:37.279
<v Speaker 6>two countries is a fraction of what it is with

0:04:37.320 --> 0:04:40.000
<v Speaker 6>the United States in Mexico, or the United States and Canada,

0:04:40.080 --> 0:04:43.560
<v Speaker 6>or even the United States and Europe. So in that respect,

0:04:43.600 --> 0:04:45.680
<v Speaker 6>it's unusual. I think. If you think about it though,

0:04:45.680 --> 0:04:48.919
<v Speaker 6>in terms of locking in dollar supremacy and using the

0:04:49.000 --> 0:04:55.320
<v Speaker 6>dollar as an economic tool, a tool of geostrategy, if

0:04:55.360 --> 0:04:57.880
<v Speaker 6>you will, it begins to make a little more sense.

0:04:58.680 --> 0:05:01.640
<v Speaker 1>You said that different elements that we could we could

0:05:01.640 --> 0:05:04.560
<v Speaker 1>talk about with this. One is how another one is

0:05:05.200 --> 0:05:06.000
<v Speaker 1>how this could end.

0:05:06.960 --> 0:05:09.320
<v Speaker 6>Well, let's talk about what is it that we're actually

0:05:09.360 --> 0:05:13.400
<v Speaker 6>talking about here. You mentioned that the Treasure Secretary today

0:05:13.560 --> 0:05:16.280
<v Speaker 6>talked about it as a bridge to a better economic

0:05:16.320 --> 0:05:19.800
<v Speaker 6>future and not a bailout, and not a bailout. But

0:05:20.440 --> 0:05:23.400
<v Speaker 6>the operative word there is bridge, because bridge means something

0:05:23.400 --> 0:05:25.560
<v Speaker 6>from here to there. In other words, what's the there?

0:05:26.200 --> 0:05:27.960
<v Speaker 6>This is a bridge until when?

0:05:28.240 --> 0:05:28.480
<v Speaker 4>Right?

0:05:28.800 --> 0:05:31.839
<v Speaker 6>Is it a bridge until after Argentina's Mitrum elections on

0:05:31.880 --> 0:05:35.120
<v Speaker 6>the twenty sixth of this month Sunday? Is it a

0:05:35.279 --> 0:05:37.600
<v Speaker 6>Trump seems to suggest as much the other day when

0:05:37.640 --> 0:05:39.880
<v Speaker 6>he said, well, you know, if Malay doesn't win we'll

0:05:39.920 --> 0:05:43.000
<v Speaker 6>get rid of the swap line, So that's one possibility.

0:05:43.600 --> 0:05:46.680
<v Speaker 6>Is it a bridge until Argentina decides to abandon the

0:05:46.680 --> 0:05:52.640
<v Speaker 6>Peso peg, which starts an acre the Minister for Deregulation

0:05:52.760 --> 0:05:57.440
<v Speaker 6>and State Transformation said was in the cards. Is it

0:05:57.640 --> 0:06:01.159
<v Speaker 6>a Is it a bridge until the twenty billion dollars

0:06:01.240 --> 0:06:05.120
<v Speaker 6>runs out, which might happen because Argentina was burning through

0:06:05.120 --> 0:06:07.279
<v Speaker 6>a billion and a half dollars worth of foreign currency

0:06:07.320 --> 0:06:09.920
<v Speaker 6>reserves a week a billion and a half a week

0:06:09.960 --> 0:06:13.040
<v Speaker 6>before the swap line was put in place. Is it

0:06:13.200 --> 0:06:19.000
<v Speaker 6>until Argentina's economy can eventually support an exchange rate at

0:06:19.040 --> 0:06:22.359
<v Speaker 6>this level It certainly can't right now. Or maybe is

0:06:22.400 --> 0:06:25.640
<v Speaker 6>it a bridge until I don't know, President Trump just

0:06:25.680 --> 0:06:28.600
<v Speaker 6>loses patience or President Malay does something to annoy him.

0:06:28.640 --> 0:06:30.120
<v Speaker 3>It's a lot to be any of those. It's a

0:06:30.120 --> 0:06:32.600
<v Speaker 3>lot of questions. It's a lot of like possible scenarios.

0:06:32.640 --> 0:06:35.800
<v Speaker 3>You know, Bloomberg reporter that Jamie Diamond is visiting Argentina

0:06:36.160 --> 0:06:39.800
<v Speaker 3>kind of an unprecedented show of support for the government. Mean,

0:06:39.960 --> 0:06:41.440
<v Speaker 3>at the same time, we've had I think it's the

0:06:41.440 --> 0:06:44.039
<v Speaker 3>Wall Street Journal reporting that banks are having a hard

0:06:44.040 --> 0:06:47.240
<v Speaker 3>time kind of getting around this without some kind of guarantees.

0:06:47.000 --> 0:06:51.000
<v Speaker 6>Nobody knows. Nobody knows what Argentina is pledging as collateral.

0:06:51.400 --> 0:06:54.440
<v Speaker 6>In fact, nobody has seen the agreement. To our knowledge,

0:06:54.720 --> 0:06:58.640
<v Speaker 6>the banks themselves, which you're playing intermediary roles here, don't

0:06:58.680 --> 0:07:05.240
<v Speaker 6>know what Argentina has agreed to pledge. You know, so

0:07:05.320 --> 0:07:09.120
<v Speaker 6>that the United States isn't just on the unlimited losing

0:07:09.240 --> 0:07:12.440
<v Speaker 6>end of a bad trade. And that is possible here, right.

0:07:12.840 --> 0:07:17.600
<v Speaker 6>The big difference between what's going on here and the

0:07:17.640 --> 0:07:20.240
<v Speaker 6>comparison that everybody wants to make with the trade that

0:07:20.280 --> 0:07:22.760
<v Speaker 6>broke the Bank of England that the Treasury Secretary was

0:07:22.800 --> 0:07:24.840
<v Speaker 6>involved in that he worked for George Soros and Stan

0:07:24.920 --> 0:07:27.440
<v Speaker 6>Druck and Miller back in the early nineteen nineties. The

0:07:27.440 --> 0:07:31.600
<v Speaker 6>big difference here is that then the UK had nobody

0:07:31.640 --> 0:07:35.880
<v Speaker 6>backstopping them. Now Argentina has the United States backstopping it.

0:07:36.560 --> 0:07:39.320
<v Speaker 6>But as I say, nobody knows until when nobody knows

0:07:40.320 --> 0:07:42.560
<v Speaker 6>if there are any mechanisms that have been put in

0:07:42.600 --> 0:07:46.280
<v Speaker 6>place to make the US taxpayer, if you will, hole,

0:07:46.840 --> 0:07:50.560
<v Speaker 6>should the Treasury Department sustain losses on this trade. I've

0:07:50.600 --> 0:07:54.680
<v Speaker 6>heard that Argentina's uranium reserves may be involved that some

0:07:54.800 --> 0:07:58.520
<v Speaker 6>kind of preferential access to Argentine markets might be involved.

0:07:58.840 --> 0:08:02.960
<v Speaker 6>Who knows. It's just it's like it's like a ready

0:08:03.000 --> 0:08:06.640
<v Speaker 6>aim fire, you know, or a fire you know, ready

0:08:06.680 --> 0:08:08.800
<v Speaker 6>aim in the sense that the swap line was put

0:08:08.840 --> 0:08:12.240
<v Speaker 6>in place, and then it appears, since no document has

0:08:12.280 --> 0:08:15.600
<v Speaker 6>surfaced yet, that all of the mechanics behind it are

0:08:15.680 --> 0:08:18.880
<v Speaker 6>being taken care of after the fact. I don't know,

0:08:19.760 --> 0:08:22.560
<v Speaker 6>but my point is that if anybody knows, he or

0:08:22.600 --> 0:08:24.840
<v Speaker 6>she hasn't put in his hand to say, hey, I know.

0:08:25.480 --> 0:08:28.400
<v Speaker 1>The Treasury Secretary, as you mentioned, described this as a

0:08:28.400 --> 0:08:30.680
<v Speaker 1>bridge to a better economic future for Argentina, not a

0:08:30.680 --> 0:08:33.200
<v Speaker 1>bail out. Is the not a bailout part a fair

0:08:33.240 --> 0:08:35.120
<v Speaker 1>way to describe it in your view? Is this not

0:08:35.200 --> 0:08:35.720
<v Speaker 1>a bail out?

0:08:36.000 --> 0:08:37.560
<v Speaker 6>I think a bailout is in the eye of the

0:08:37.600 --> 0:08:44.680
<v Speaker 6>beholder in some respects. It's unquestionably a gift to President

0:08:44.760 --> 0:08:49.280
<v Speaker 6>Milay ahead of these mid term elections. It isn't working

0:08:49.520 --> 0:08:52.960
<v Speaker 6>for the time being right. The PAESO fresh weakened today

0:08:53.120 --> 0:08:56.840
<v Speaker 6>to a fresh low, and Argentine bonds which had gained

0:08:56.920 --> 0:09:00.280
<v Speaker 6>earlier on the formal announcement of the sagree and have

0:09:00.360 --> 0:09:03.840
<v Speaker 6>since given up those gains and I think are posting losses,

0:09:03.880 --> 0:09:05.840
<v Speaker 6>so it would appear to be a gift in the

0:09:05.880 --> 0:09:09.160
<v Speaker 6>sense that the PASO exchange rate or the PEG to

0:09:09.200 --> 0:09:12.920
<v Speaker 6>the dollar is unsustainable. Milay doesn't want to allow the

0:09:12.960 --> 0:09:15.679
<v Speaker 6>PAESO to float freely. He wants to maintain this peg

0:09:15.960 --> 0:09:20.120
<v Speaker 6>so that Argentine inflation is under control. A critical critical

0:09:20.160 --> 0:09:25.120
<v Speaker 6>economic consideration going into the midterms. So even if Argentine,

0:09:25.240 --> 0:09:28.320
<v Speaker 6>I like, there's no question if the PAESO peg were

0:09:28.360 --> 0:09:32.120
<v Speaker 6>to be abandoned today, it's not like inflation would Inflation

0:09:32.280 --> 0:09:35.400
<v Speaker 6>would show up immediately, but it wouldn't show up in

0:09:35.440 --> 0:09:38.920
<v Speaker 6>official statistics. Excuse me for some time to come. But

0:09:39.080 --> 0:09:43.280
<v Speaker 6>Argentines are so conditioned to this, they know what would happen.

0:09:43.679 --> 0:09:45.120
<v Speaker 3>Again, I want to go back to and I know

0:09:45.200 --> 0:09:47.800
<v Speaker 3>we've got a couple more minutes here, but Eric the

0:09:48.000 --> 0:09:51.040
<v Speaker 3>US involvement, and again it may be a relationship President

0:09:51.040 --> 0:09:54.560
<v Speaker 3>Trump wants to have with the President of Argentina, But

0:09:54.679 --> 0:09:58.440
<v Speaker 3>I mean, Bloomberg editors wrote an opinion piece why isn't

0:09:58.480 --> 0:10:01.360
<v Speaker 3>the IMF coming in here? And the other question we

0:10:01.640 --> 0:10:03.400
<v Speaker 3>as a group have been trying to figure out, is

0:10:03.440 --> 0:10:05.760
<v Speaker 3>it also to kind of keep China at Bay is

0:10:05.800 --> 0:10:07.360
<v Speaker 3>there that aspect as well.

0:10:07.960 --> 0:10:11.480
<v Speaker 6>Argentina also has an existing eighteen billion dollar currency swap

0:10:11.559 --> 0:10:15.199
<v Speaker 6>with China that goes back well before Sturtzenegger was the

0:10:15.200 --> 0:10:16.960
<v Speaker 6>central Bank governor. I think it may go back to

0:10:17.000 --> 0:10:20.000
<v Speaker 6>twenty fifteen, and perhaps even before that. There has been

0:10:20.040 --> 0:10:22.440
<v Speaker 6>some talk that one of the conditions behind, or at

0:10:22.520 --> 0:10:25.000
<v Speaker 6>least one of the underlying conditions to this swap with

0:10:25.080 --> 0:10:29.640
<v Speaker 6>the Treasury would be that Argentina somehow winds up that

0:10:29.760 --> 0:10:33.920
<v Speaker 6>previous swap agreement with the Chinese. Who knows as far

0:10:33.960 --> 0:10:38.440
<v Speaker 6>as why the IMF isn't involved, I think the easy

0:10:38.440 --> 0:10:40.719
<v Speaker 6>answer to that question is how many months would it

0:10:40.760 --> 0:10:42.960
<v Speaker 6>take the IMF to get its act together? This was

0:10:43.000 --> 0:10:46.440
<v Speaker 6>something that this was a perceived need on the part

0:10:46.480 --> 0:10:49.880
<v Speaker 6>of the Argentine government the Malay government heading into these

0:10:50.480 --> 0:10:55.040
<v Speaker 6>critical midterm elections that there's no way, there's no conceivable

0:10:55.080 --> 0:10:58.160
<v Speaker 6>way that the IMF, in my mind, given everything that

0:10:58.200 --> 0:11:01.640
<v Speaker 6>we've observed in our careers and everything we know that

0:11:01.720 --> 0:11:05.319
<v Speaker 6>precedes that there's no way that it could possibly act

0:11:05.320 --> 0:11:06.120
<v Speaker 6>it without much haste.

0:11:06.240 --> 0:11:08.760
<v Speaker 1>So before we let you go, how could this end?

0:11:09.720 --> 0:11:11.160
<v Speaker 1>What could it mean for the US If it's a

0:11:11.160 --> 0:11:12.840
<v Speaker 1>bad trade, well, if.

0:11:12.760 --> 0:11:15.640
<v Speaker 6>It's a bad trade. It could. I find it hard

0:11:15.720 --> 0:11:18.880
<v Speaker 6>to believe that the United States would put itself in

0:11:18.880 --> 0:11:21.880
<v Speaker 6>a position to ultimately lose money, but it may lose

0:11:21.920 --> 0:11:24.920
<v Speaker 6>money on paper and have to recover that money, just

0:11:25.080 --> 0:11:28.160
<v Speaker 6>like somebody who has been left holding the bag on

0:11:28.240 --> 0:11:32.160
<v Speaker 6>a bad debt by liquidating some kind of Argentine assets

0:11:32.320 --> 0:11:37.559
<v Speaker 6>or somehow you know, turning preferential access into Argentine assets

0:11:38.000 --> 0:11:43.400
<v Speaker 6>or Argentine markets into value over time, that wouldn't look good.

0:11:43.800 --> 0:11:47.319
<v Speaker 6>And again it all depends on how long this bridge is.

0:11:48.280 --> 0:11:51.439
<v Speaker 6>We have seen in the credit markets that you can

0:11:51.520 --> 0:11:56.520
<v Speaker 6>paper things over for an awfully long time before either

0:11:57.320 --> 0:12:01.000
<v Speaker 6>things reflate and you're able to shout at par or

0:12:01.040 --> 0:12:03.600
<v Speaker 6>you have to ultimately take some losses. So it's not

0:12:03.679 --> 0:12:05.760
<v Speaker 6>like that's necessarily going to happen next week. It's not

0:12:05.800 --> 0:12:08.640
<v Speaker 6>like it's necessarily going to happen next month, next quarter,

0:12:08.720 --> 0:12:13.719
<v Speaker 6>even next year. But if Malay doesn't succeed, and if

0:12:13.760 --> 0:12:18.040
<v Speaker 6>the Argentine economy doesn't continue to revive and inflation doesn't

0:12:18.080 --> 0:12:21.319
<v Speaker 6>remain under control, it's hard to see how the speculative

0:12:21.360 --> 0:12:25.240
<v Speaker 6>pressure against the peso won't continue, and we may even

0:12:25.760 --> 0:12:28.360
<v Speaker 6>see I don't know We can only speculate here that

0:12:28.559 --> 0:12:30.640
<v Speaker 6>twenty billion dollars may not end up being enough.

0:12:31.160 --> 0:12:33.120
<v Speaker 3>All Right, we just got schooled by Eric Shatsker in

0:12:33.160 --> 0:12:35.640
<v Speaker 3>a good way, in a good way. Thank you so much, Eric,

0:12:35.840 --> 0:12:37.160
<v Speaker 3>so appreciate it.

0:12:37.160 --> 0:12:37.960
<v Speaker 5>It's what we needed to know.

0:12:37.960 --> 0:12:40.720
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg New Economy Editorial Director Eric Shatsker.

0:12:45.400 --> 0:12:49.400
<v Speaker 2>You're listening to the Bloomberg Business Weekdaily podcast. Catch US

0:12:49.480 --> 0:12:52.920
<v Speaker 2>live weekday afternoons from two to five pm Eastern Listen

0:12:52.960 --> 0:12:56.520
<v Speaker 2>on Apple CarPlay and Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business app,

0:12:56.679 --> 0:12:59.240
<v Speaker 2>or watch US Live on YouTube.

0:13:00.000 --> 0:13:02.880
<v Speaker 1>Trump's administration is involved in talks for a US company

0:13:02.880 --> 0:13:06.280
<v Speaker 1>to access one of the world's largest untapped deposits of tungsten.

0:13:06.360 --> 0:13:08.960
<v Speaker 1>This is a metal used by the Pentagon to make ammunition,

0:13:09.120 --> 0:13:10.840
<v Speaker 1>projectiles and other weapon read.

0:13:11.000 --> 0:13:13.440
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's really interesting, right. We continue to see that

0:13:13.520 --> 0:13:17.960
<v Speaker 3>Rare Earth's share space move as a result of these

0:13:18.000 --> 0:13:20.880
<v Speaker 3>headlines coming out from the White House. Keep in mind,

0:13:20.920 --> 0:13:24.000
<v Speaker 3>as to mention President Trump signing that landmark pack with

0:13:24.559 --> 0:13:29.000
<v Speaker 3>visiting Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albani's to boost America's access

0:13:29.000 --> 0:13:31.520
<v Speaker 3>to Rare Earth's and other critical minerals. It's an effort

0:13:31.559 --> 0:13:34.439
<v Speaker 3>to counter China's type grip on the supply chains of

0:13:34.520 --> 0:13:37.200
<v Speaker 3>key metals. Now, the two governments will jointly invest in

0:13:37.200 --> 0:13:40.280
<v Speaker 3>a swath of minds and processing projects in Australia to

0:13:40.320 --> 0:13:44.440
<v Speaker 3>boost production of commodities used in advance technologies, everything from

0:13:44.640 --> 0:13:47.559
<v Speaker 3>electric vehicles to setment conductors and fighter plants. It goes

0:13:47.679 --> 0:13:48.959
<v Speaker 3>into a lot of stuff too.

0:13:49.120 --> 0:13:51.520
<v Speaker 1>In a story on the Bloomberg, our next guest says, quote,

0:13:51.520 --> 0:13:55.640
<v Speaker 1>this is the most significant bilateral minerals cooperation we have

0:13:55.720 --> 0:13:59.360
<v Speaker 1>seen between two major Western countries. Here to explain why

0:13:59.440 --> 0:14:02.400
<v Speaker 1>is Graceland Asker, and she's director of the Critical Minerals

0:14:02.600 --> 0:14:05.319
<v Speaker 1>Security Program at the Center for Strategic and International Study.

0:14:05.360 --> 0:14:09.680
<v Speaker 1>She joins us from the Washington, DC bureau of Bloomberg News. Graceland,

0:14:09.679 --> 0:14:12.679
<v Speaker 1>welcome back to Bloomberg Business Weekdaily. It's always great to

0:14:12.720 --> 0:14:14.680
<v Speaker 1>have you on the program. I do want to start

0:14:14.720 --> 0:14:19.640
<v Speaker 1>with the bilateral minerals cooperation that we are seeing between

0:14:19.680 --> 0:14:22.680
<v Speaker 1>the United States and Australia. Why is all of this

0:14:22.800 --> 0:14:23.880
<v Speaker 1>happening right now?

0:14:24.560 --> 0:14:25.560
<v Speaker 6>It's so great to be back.

0:14:25.600 --> 0:14:27.240
<v Speaker 7>You know, this is a really big deal, and it's

0:14:27.280 --> 0:14:30.560
<v Speaker 7>a big deal because this is minerals cooperation that's going

0:14:30.880 --> 0:14:33.480
<v Speaker 7>not just from conversation, and we've been doing years of

0:14:33.520 --> 0:14:36.600
<v Speaker 7>talking about minerals to actually putting the resources in to

0:14:36.680 --> 0:14:40.440
<v Speaker 7>develop really strategic projects. I mean, we've agreed to commit

0:14:40.600 --> 0:14:44.000
<v Speaker 7>one billion dollars each to be deployed within six months

0:14:44.040 --> 0:14:48.560
<v Speaker 7>on strategic projects, and this could be Alcoa's landmark gallium refinery.

0:14:48.840 --> 0:14:51.080
<v Speaker 7>Keep in mind, China has cut us off of gallium,

0:14:51.520 --> 0:14:55.160
<v Speaker 7>really crucial material for semiconductors, and this gallium refinery is

0:14:55.160 --> 0:14:57.960
<v Speaker 7>going to produce one hundred tons a year in Western Australia.

0:14:58.040 --> 0:15:00.040
<v Speaker 7>That may not sound like a lot, but remember the

0:15:00.120 --> 0:15:02.680
<v Speaker 7>US only uses about twenty tons of galli in the year,

0:15:02.960 --> 0:15:07.120
<v Speaker 7>so it's actually really significant to Australia announcing equity in

0:15:07.160 --> 0:15:08.520
<v Speaker 7>a rare earth project there.

0:15:08.720 --> 0:15:09.920
<v Speaker 3>But what we've also.

0:15:09.680 --> 0:15:12.760
<v Speaker 7>Seen is the first time that these countries are making

0:15:12.800 --> 0:15:15.440
<v Speaker 7>a concerted effort to counter China. So you may have

0:15:15.480 --> 0:15:19.480
<v Speaker 7>seen that both countries have committed to preventing Chinese acquisitions

0:15:19.720 --> 0:15:22.600
<v Speaker 7>of new projects, both within their own countries but also

0:15:22.680 --> 0:15:26.240
<v Speaker 7>using diplomatic instruments. In other countries, we've seen a commitment

0:15:26.280 --> 0:15:29.720
<v Speaker 7>to using price price support. So really, when you take

0:15:29.920 --> 0:15:32.200
<v Speaker 7>the summation of all of these different efforts, We're really

0:15:32.240 --> 0:15:34.720
<v Speaker 7>seeing rubber hit the road with a country that has

0:15:35.120 --> 0:15:38.640
<v Speaker 7>enormous geological potential. We're talking about forty minerals that the

0:15:38.720 --> 0:15:42.400
<v Speaker 7>US identified as critical. Incredible financial market gets in deep

0:15:42.480 --> 0:15:43.479
<v Speaker 7>technical expertise.

0:15:43.680 --> 0:15:46.120
<v Speaker 3>Is this all bottom line about putting kind of a

0:15:46.160 --> 0:15:47.200
<v Speaker 3>hold on China?

0:15:49.080 --> 0:15:52.360
<v Speaker 7>This is about countering China from a supply and a

0:15:52.400 --> 0:15:55.440
<v Speaker 7>demand perspective. You know, let's be totally honest. This year

0:15:55.520 --> 0:15:57.880
<v Speaker 7>was a wake up call for the whole world until now.

0:15:58.400 --> 0:16:01.040
<v Speaker 7>A lot of the export restrictions on critical minerals we're

0:16:01.080 --> 0:16:03.840
<v Speaker 7>really targeted at US here in the United States, but

0:16:03.920 --> 0:16:07.640
<v Speaker 7>the multiple rounds of restrictions this year actually hit companies

0:16:07.680 --> 0:16:10.760
<v Speaker 7>around the world, like these recent rare earth export restrictions.

0:16:10.880 --> 0:16:12.520
<v Speaker 6>Australia is still on the other.

0:16:12.440 --> 0:16:12.920
<v Speaker 4>End of them.

0:16:13.120 --> 0:16:15.240
<v Speaker 7>So what we're really doing is we're uniting with our

0:16:15.280 --> 0:16:18.160
<v Speaker 7>allies and again Australia being the one country that has

0:16:18.160 --> 0:16:21.920
<v Speaker 7>fought beside US in every war since nineteen eighteen, right

0:16:22.000 --> 0:16:24.280
<v Speaker 7>to say, okay, if we work together, we can actually

0:16:24.280 --> 0:16:26.080
<v Speaker 7>start to counter China in a meaningful way.

0:16:26.520 --> 0:16:29.400
<v Speaker 3>Very then significant again, because it feels like we have

0:16:29.440 --> 0:16:31.560
<v Speaker 3>gone through a bunch of months where the US is

0:16:31.600 --> 0:16:33.200
<v Speaker 3>like we don't need you. We're going to do it alone.

0:16:33.200 --> 0:16:35.680
<v Speaker 3>We're going to build up stuff supply chain, so and

0:16:35.680 --> 0:16:37.720
<v Speaker 3>so forth. At least this is coming from the administration

0:16:37.840 --> 0:16:40.440
<v Speaker 3>to do stuff here in the United States. This feels

0:16:40.520 --> 0:16:44.120
<v Speaker 3>like it's very significant the US saying wait, we actually

0:16:44.160 --> 0:16:46.280
<v Speaker 3>need to have global partners on this. And this is

0:16:46.400 --> 0:16:48.680
<v Speaker 3>kind of a big message. Again I'm going to point

0:16:48.720 --> 0:16:51.160
<v Speaker 3>out to China and really the world at large.

0:16:51.800 --> 0:16:54.240
<v Speaker 7>And this is a really important message because I want

0:16:54.240 --> 0:16:58.680
<v Speaker 7>you to understand the historical relationship of Australian mining. Historically,

0:16:58.760 --> 0:17:02.600
<v Speaker 7>Australian minerals have flow have gone to China for processing.

0:17:02.800 --> 0:17:06.600
<v Speaker 7>So it's a highly vertically integrated industry between these two countries.

0:17:06.840 --> 0:17:09.119
<v Speaker 7>So this was a pretty big disruption. You know, if

0:17:09.160 --> 0:17:12.280
<v Speaker 7>we roll out restrictions on China, no, and really bat deny,

0:17:12.440 --> 0:17:15.480
<v Speaker 7>but for Australia where those minerals go to China, this

0:17:15.560 --> 0:17:20.000
<v Speaker 7>is a really important realignment with US and breaking from

0:17:20.040 --> 0:17:22.600
<v Speaker 7>what has been their historical trade relationship as it relates

0:17:22.640 --> 0:17:23.640
<v Speaker 7>to the mining industry.

0:17:24.200 --> 0:17:26.840
<v Speaker 1>So I guess the question that we have is about

0:17:26.840 --> 0:17:30.159
<v Speaker 1>the US companies that are a part of this, and

0:17:30.240 --> 0:17:33.359
<v Speaker 1>we've spoken to quite a few of these. We spoke

0:17:33.480 --> 0:17:37.760
<v Speaker 1>to US antimony. Gary Evans over there a critical mineral, not.

0:17:39.240 --> 0:17:41.000
<v Speaker 4>A rare earth per se, but.

0:17:41.400 --> 0:17:43.800
<v Speaker 1>In the same space, and with the idea that you know,

0:17:43.800 --> 0:17:46.679
<v Speaker 1>they're getting a government contract, not investment from the government,

0:17:46.680 --> 0:17:50.000
<v Speaker 1>but a government contract to actually buy antimony for Defense

0:17:50.040 --> 0:17:53.800
<v Speaker 1>Department purposes. But I'm curious about US company's role and

0:17:54.200 --> 0:17:57.760
<v Speaker 1>if there is such an opportunity for many different US

0:17:57.800 --> 0:18:00.360
<v Speaker 1>companies right now to take advantage of this. And look,

0:18:00.359 --> 0:18:02.640
<v Speaker 1>we have an investing audience. They want to know which

0:18:02.640 --> 0:18:05.359
<v Speaker 1>are the companies that are best positioned right now to

0:18:05.440 --> 0:18:07.600
<v Speaker 1>be in a place where they can be the ones

0:18:07.640 --> 0:18:11.840
<v Speaker 1>that benefit from this increased need for critical minerals.

0:18:13.359 --> 0:18:15.720
<v Speaker 7>So one of the big parts of this a new

0:18:15.800 --> 0:18:18.520
<v Speaker 7>Framework agreement is that they will we will strategically together

0:18:18.720 --> 0:18:21.160
<v Speaker 7>identify priority projects in companies.

0:18:21.480 --> 0:18:21.960
<v Speaker 6>One of the.

0:18:21.920 --> 0:18:25.880
<v Speaker 7>Early leaders here is Alcoa. Again, Alcoa is a Philadelphia

0:18:25.880 --> 0:18:29.159
<v Speaker 7>based company who is now building this gallium refinery through

0:18:29.200 --> 0:18:32.480
<v Speaker 7>support from the Department of War, and it was announced

0:18:32.520 --> 0:18:35.600
<v Speaker 7>by the US and Australian governments yesterday. Again, I want

0:18:35.640 --> 0:18:37.679
<v Speaker 7>to take you back to the fact that gallium is

0:18:37.680 --> 0:18:40.040
<v Speaker 7>a no brainer of a priority for both sides because

0:18:40.080 --> 0:18:42.600
<v Speaker 7>it was a commodity that China cut us off from

0:18:42.680 --> 0:18:45.600
<v Speaker 7>earlier this year. So really, when we start to look

0:18:45.640 --> 0:18:47.800
<v Speaker 7>at what are the winners going to be, I mean

0:18:47.920 --> 0:18:51.440
<v Speaker 7>rare earth. Obviously we're going to see linus being really important.

0:18:52.320 --> 0:18:55.440
<v Speaker 7>But broadly speaking, for some of these minor medals, which

0:18:55.440 --> 0:18:58.119
<v Speaker 7>antimony is one of them, we've seen tungsten emerge in

0:18:58.160 --> 0:19:01.040
<v Speaker 7>the news quite recently. These minor metals are going to

0:19:01.119 --> 0:19:03.560
<v Speaker 7>be the ones where we're highly vulnerable and where we

0:19:03.680 --> 0:19:06.640
<v Speaker 7>do not always have the geology to make it work,

0:19:06.680 --> 0:19:08.160
<v Speaker 7>and where Australia often does.

0:19:10.280 --> 0:19:12.920
<v Speaker 1>We both have questions, but Carole, you go first, Well,

0:19:13.040 --> 0:19:13.560
<v Speaker 1>I want.

0:19:13.400 --> 0:19:15.640
<v Speaker 3>To go back forgive me if we're abouts around, because

0:19:15.640 --> 0:19:17.320
<v Speaker 3>it's just sometimes you know, the brain is a little

0:19:17.359 --> 0:19:20.120
<v Speaker 3>slow and things settle in. But Grace, what I want

0:19:20.160 --> 0:19:22.800
<v Speaker 3>to ask you is going back to, as you said,

0:19:22.840 --> 0:19:26.560
<v Speaker 3>a big deal for Australia to do this because they

0:19:26.600 --> 0:19:30.560
<v Speaker 3>have been so intertwined with China when it comes to

0:19:31.200 --> 0:19:36.080
<v Speaker 3>Australia exporting large quantities of raw minerals and then China processing.

0:19:36.160 --> 0:19:39.840
<v Speaker 3>I mean, this has been a very important trading relationship

0:19:40.240 --> 0:19:42.800
<v Speaker 3>and so we know US and China has been antagonistic

0:19:42.840 --> 0:19:46.080
<v Speaker 3>for a while, but to have them do that. That's

0:19:46.200 --> 0:19:47.160
<v Speaker 3>really significant.

0:19:48.760 --> 0:19:52.080
<v Speaker 7>It's extremely significant. But you've been seeing that growing tension

0:19:52.280 --> 0:19:55.760
<v Speaker 7>for but probably the last seven years. Remember that Australia

0:19:55.920 --> 0:19:57.920
<v Speaker 7>was the first country to the ban howway back in

0:19:57.960 --> 0:20:02.480
<v Speaker 7>about twenty eighteen. They also legislation to prevent foreign interference

0:20:02.520 --> 0:20:05.679
<v Speaker 7>in their higher education sector. More recently, there was a

0:20:05.720 --> 0:20:09.320
<v Speaker 7>one point twenty five billion dollar Australian loan that was

0:20:09.359 --> 0:20:12.159
<v Speaker 7>given to build the Iluca refinery.

0:20:11.720 --> 0:20:12.399
<v Speaker 3>For rare Earth.

0:20:12.720 --> 0:20:14.639
<v Speaker 7>One of the t's and c's of that was that

0:20:14.760 --> 0:20:18.280
<v Speaker 7>off take had to go to allied countries. But now

0:20:18.320 --> 0:20:21.320
<v Speaker 7>what this really does now I mean, is it starts

0:20:21.320 --> 0:20:25.359
<v Speaker 7>to potentially re architecture supply chains in a meaningful way. Australia,

0:20:25.400 --> 0:20:27.840
<v Speaker 7>for example, is the biggest lithium producer in the world.

0:20:27.880 --> 0:20:30.840
<v Speaker 7>They produce about close to sixty percent over a world's lithium.

0:20:31.000 --> 0:20:34.520
<v Speaker 7>Over ninety percent of that actually goes to China for refining.

0:20:35.000 --> 0:20:38.439
<v Speaker 7>If that didn't happen, China would lose its grip on

0:20:38.560 --> 0:20:42.720
<v Speaker 7>lithium ion batteries. So what this deal really stands to

0:20:42.800 --> 0:20:47.120
<v Speaker 7>do is re architecture supply chains, not just from mind

0:20:47.240 --> 0:20:49.520
<v Speaker 7>but down to the manufactured good.

0:20:49.720 --> 0:20:52.199
<v Speaker 1>So if we think about this in the context of

0:20:52.440 --> 0:20:55.520
<v Speaker 1>the leverage that China could still have even after the

0:20:55.640 --> 0:20:58.040
<v Speaker 1>US makes deals such as this and deals with allies,

0:20:58.320 --> 0:21:00.760
<v Speaker 1>where's that leverage.

0:21:00.920 --> 0:21:02.720
<v Speaker 7>The leverage is still there in the short term with

0:21:02.840 --> 0:21:06.639
<v Speaker 7>rare earths for sure, no doubt. Right although Australian Australia's

0:21:06.680 --> 0:21:09.840
<v Speaker 7>Linus was the first company to separate heavy rare erths

0:21:09.840 --> 0:21:12.639
<v Speaker 7>earlier this year outside of China, but it's going to

0:21:12.720 --> 0:21:15.280
<v Speaker 7>go beyond that. There was a line in this framework

0:21:15.320 --> 0:21:18.520
<v Speaker 7>agreement that actually said that the US and Australia will

0:21:18.560 --> 0:21:22.960
<v Speaker 7>work with other international partners on price support mechanisms. So

0:21:23.080 --> 0:21:26.480
<v Speaker 7>this conversation is likely to extend beyond these two countries

0:21:26.760 --> 0:21:29.600
<v Speaker 7>to the G seven later this year to think about

0:21:29.600 --> 0:21:33.520
<v Speaker 7>how do we scale these partnerships up even more so, really,

0:21:33.520 --> 0:21:35.920
<v Speaker 7>what we're starting to see is an economy of scale

0:21:35.960 --> 0:21:39.680
<v Speaker 7>that we're creating for the minerals and the processing capabilities.

0:21:39.800 --> 0:21:42.720
<v Speaker 7>I mentioned that our COED deal earlier, that our COED

0:21:42.720 --> 0:21:44.480
<v Speaker 7>deal is also getting Japanese financing.

0:21:44.600 --> 0:21:46.159
<v Speaker 3>It's actually a tripartheid effort.

0:21:46.440 --> 0:21:49.639
<v Speaker 7>So an example of how this bilateral is going to

0:21:49.640 --> 0:21:52.119
<v Speaker 7>set the stage for what's probably going to be a

0:21:52.200 --> 0:21:54.400
<v Speaker 7>much bigger play of countries to counter China.

0:21:54.440 --> 0:21:58.080
<v Speaker 3>How do we figure out, you know, especially as we

0:21:58.119 --> 0:22:02.000
<v Speaker 3>see investors, you know, pushing up shares on all of

0:22:02.040 --> 0:22:06.160
<v Speaker 3>these stories about the relationships, the investments by the US

0:22:06.200 --> 0:22:09.919
<v Speaker 3>government and various critical mineral companies, how do we figure

0:22:09.960 --> 0:22:14.320
<v Speaker 3>out which is investor speculation, you know, kind of chasing

0:22:14.320 --> 0:22:16.840
<v Speaker 3>a trade. Do you think it's misplaced or is it

0:22:16.880 --> 0:22:21.840
<v Speaker 3>a bit irrationally exuberant, or you think these investments, these relationships,

0:22:22.480 --> 0:22:25.359
<v Speaker 3>this is the build out. It's happening, and with good reason,

0:22:25.400 --> 0:22:26.760
<v Speaker 3>because the demand's going to be there.

0:22:28.520 --> 0:22:32.000
<v Speaker 7>The broader buildout of the sector, when it comes to mining,

0:22:32.119 --> 0:22:35.159
<v Speaker 7>being much more strategic, is absolutely here to stay. And

0:22:35.200 --> 0:22:37.160
<v Speaker 7>it's here to stay for a couple of reasons. One

0:22:37.200 --> 0:22:40.040
<v Speaker 7>of them is we are diversifying away from China, right,

0:22:40.359 --> 0:22:42.679
<v Speaker 7>But the second thing we have to remember is that

0:22:42.760 --> 0:22:45.520
<v Speaker 7>certain of these commodities, I need a lot more in

0:22:45.600 --> 0:22:49.080
<v Speaker 7>objective terms, I need a lot more copper to electrify,

0:22:49.200 --> 0:22:52.080
<v Speaker 7>to build data centers, to build defense technologies.

0:22:52.200 --> 0:22:53.800
<v Speaker 3>So it's also the growing demand.

0:22:53.840 --> 0:22:57.560
<v Speaker 7>So I'd say the larger macro trend in prioritization is

0:22:57.640 --> 0:23:01.400
<v Speaker 7>here to stay. And again remember that the US Australia relationship,

0:23:01.440 --> 0:23:04.320
<v Speaker 7>it's a continuation. It was being built under the Biden

0:23:04.359 --> 0:23:07.560
<v Speaker 7>administration as well. But what you know, the other thing

0:23:07.600 --> 0:23:09.640
<v Speaker 7>though is you know, there are going to be fads

0:23:09.640 --> 0:23:11.960
<v Speaker 7>that come and go when it come to specific minerals.

0:23:12.000 --> 0:23:14.320
<v Speaker 7>There's no doubt, right some things are going to you know,

0:23:14.520 --> 0:23:17.040
<v Speaker 7>hit media attention. Certain deals are going to hit media

0:23:17.080 --> 0:23:20.199
<v Speaker 7>attention and they're going to fall away. Not everything that

0:23:20.240 --> 0:23:22.960
<v Speaker 7>this government is looking at is going to succeed, but

0:23:23.040 --> 0:23:25.320
<v Speaker 7>what we are hoping is that the right number of

0:23:25.359 --> 0:23:28.480
<v Speaker 7>them succeed to create a more resilient supply chain. But

0:23:28.560 --> 0:23:30.120
<v Speaker 7>there are a lot of coming and goings.

0:23:30.200 --> 0:23:32.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, certainly the relationship with Australia is on our radar

0:23:33.080 --> 0:23:36.119
<v Speaker 1>right now, given the visit of the Prime Minister. But

0:23:36.160 --> 0:23:39.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm wondering what other countries the US could ally with

0:23:40.400 --> 0:23:43.520
<v Speaker 1>that would be able to offer some sort of countermeasure

0:23:43.600 --> 0:23:45.160
<v Speaker 1>to China and its capabilities.

0:23:45.880 --> 0:23:48.800
<v Speaker 7>So countries that like I'm looking at with interest Japan

0:23:48.880 --> 0:23:53.760
<v Speaker 7>in South Korea, particularly because of their midstream and downstream capabilities.

0:23:53.880 --> 0:23:56.399
<v Speaker 7>I'm looking at the UK. There have been you know,

0:23:56.440 --> 0:23:59.960
<v Speaker 7>there's been some interesting acquisitions there, at least Come Metal

0:24:00.119 --> 0:24:04.320
<v Speaker 7>by USA, Rare Earth, that's an interesting one. The EU

0:24:04.560 --> 0:24:08.280
<v Speaker 7>again it's an interesting jurisdiction there as some minerals, I

0:24:08.280 --> 0:24:11.399
<v Speaker 7>mean things like Solvey for their permanent magnets in France.

0:24:11.680 --> 0:24:14.439
<v Speaker 7>An interesting one again with some conversations happening with the

0:24:14.560 --> 0:24:18.000
<v Speaker 7>US as well. So there's certain pockets of interesting transactions

0:24:18.040 --> 0:24:21.080
<v Speaker 7>happening from a global north obviously from the global south.

0:24:21.119 --> 0:24:24.280
<v Speaker 7>Brazil is still a very interesting jurisdiction to US because

0:24:24.320 --> 0:24:26.320
<v Speaker 7>they have the heavy, rare earth that can come back

0:24:26.359 --> 0:24:28.359
<v Speaker 7>and be separated here in the United States.

0:24:28.400 --> 0:24:29.280
<v Speaker 5>Everything we need to know.

0:24:29.520 --> 0:24:31.879
<v Speaker 3>Thank you, Thank you, Doctor Graceland Basker and Director of

0:24:31.880 --> 0:24:34.560
<v Speaker 3>the Critical Mineral Security Program at the Center for Strategic

0:24:34.640 --> 0:24:35.880
<v Speaker 3>and International Studies.

0:24:37.480 --> 0:24:41.320
<v Speaker 2>This is the Bloomberg Business Week Daily Podcast. Listen live

0:24:41.400 --> 0:24:44.320
<v Speaker 2>each weekday starting at two pm Eastern on Apple car

0:24:44.400 --> 0:24:47.359
<v Speaker 2>Play and Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business App. You

0:24:47.400 --> 0:24:50.600
<v Speaker 2>can also listen live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship

0:24:50.640 --> 0:24:54.240
<v Speaker 2>New York station, Just Say Alexa played Bloomberg eleven thirty

0:24:55.320 --> 0:24:55.800
<v Speaker 2>whole show.

0:24:55.920 --> 0:24:59.120
<v Speaker 1>Democrats are more disillusion than they've been in decades, Sped

0:24:59.200 --> 0:25:02.600
<v Speaker 1>up with agings, leaders frustrated by a party adrift and

0:25:02.760 --> 0:25:06.119
<v Speaker 1>unsure who their next standard bearer should be, but yearning

0:25:06.160 --> 0:25:09.120
<v Speaker 1>for someone to take on Trump So right Josh Green

0:25:09.200 --> 0:25:13.520
<v Speaker 1>and elaiju Kemisher for a Bloomberg BusinessWeek California Governor Gavin

0:25:13.560 --> 0:25:17.119
<v Speaker 1>Newsom has leaped into the breach. He's on for the

0:25:17.160 --> 0:25:21.200
<v Speaker 1>podcast a ballot Measure and tweets Governor Newsom is spoiling

0:25:21.280 --> 0:25:23.439
<v Speaker 1>for a fight with the President he is.

0:25:23.480 --> 0:25:25.399
<v Speaker 3>Indeed, It is the cover of the new issue of

0:25:25.400 --> 0:25:27.879
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg Business Week, out on newsstands, now online, and on

0:25:27.880 --> 0:25:31.600
<v Speaker 3>the Bloomberg terminal. Bloomberg BusinessWeek National correspondent Josh Green is

0:25:31.640 --> 0:25:34.240
<v Speaker 3>the lead author of the Profile of the Governor. Josh

0:25:34.280 --> 0:25:36.680
<v Speaker 3>is also the author of several books, including the number

0:25:36.680 --> 0:25:40.200
<v Speaker 3>one New York Times bestseller Devil's Bargain, Steve Bannon, Donald Trump,

0:25:40.200 --> 0:25:43.080
<v Speaker 3>and The Storming of the Presidency. He joins us Josh

0:25:43.119 --> 0:25:44.359
<v Speaker 3>from Washington, DC.

0:25:44.520 --> 0:25:45.360
<v Speaker 5>Josh, great to have.

0:25:45.359 --> 0:25:48.800
<v Speaker 3>You here with us, I mean, Gavin Newsom. He went

0:25:49.160 --> 0:25:52.000
<v Speaker 3>from one of his lowest political points earlier this year,

0:25:52.440 --> 0:25:55.159
<v Speaker 3>as deadly fires burned in southern California. She's now being

0:25:55.200 --> 0:25:58.840
<v Speaker 3>a potential leader of the Democratic Party. That seems quite

0:25:58.880 --> 0:26:02.080
<v Speaker 3>a turn. How did this happen and how dark was

0:26:02.119 --> 0:26:03.200
<v Speaker 3>it for him?

0:26:03.960 --> 0:26:06.840
<v Speaker 8>Well, yeah, as you guys said in that nice intro.

0:26:07.320 --> 0:26:09.440
<v Speaker 8>He was our cover story, our cover profile this week,

0:26:09.480 --> 0:26:11.439
<v Speaker 8>went out to the Sacramento spent some time with him,

0:26:11.480 --> 0:26:13.760
<v Speaker 8>talk to him. For a lot of people nationally, I

0:26:13.760 --> 0:26:16.280
<v Speaker 8>think outside California. The last time they really keyed in

0:26:16.280 --> 0:26:19.480
<v Speaker 8>and focused on Governor Newsom was back in January, during

0:26:19.480 --> 0:26:20.320
<v Speaker 8>the wildfires.

0:26:20.359 --> 0:26:21.480
<v Speaker 4>Things were out of control.

0:26:22.240 --> 0:26:24.920
<v Speaker 8>Trump was the new president, was sort of insulting him,

0:26:25.800 --> 0:26:28.399
<v Speaker 8>tweeting negative things about him, and so, you know, he

0:26:28.400 --> 0:26:29.919
<v Speaker 8>told us that was really the low point I think

0:26:29.960 --> 0:26:32.680
<v Speaker 8>of his governorship. But what's interesting is that over the

0:26:32.760 --> 0:26:35.960
<v Speaker 8>last couple of months, partly due to some things that

0:26:36.000 --> 0:26:39.400
<v Speaker 8>Trump has done, Newsom has re emerged on the national

0:26:39.440 --> 0:26:43.720
<v Speaker 8>stage as perhaps the most important Democrat right now, because

0:26:43.800 --> 0:26:46.280
<v Speaker 8>he is in the middle of leading a ballot initiative

0:26:46.320 --> 0:26:49.639
<v Speaker 8>that would create as many as five new Democratic House districts.

0:26:50.080 --> 0:26:53.760
<v Speaker 8>And Democrats nationally are pretty much without power. They don't

0:26:53.800 --> 0:26:56.520
<v Speaker 8>control the White House, they don't control either House of Congress,

0:26:57.200 --> 0:26:59.320
<v Speaker 8>but they're very much hoping to win back the House

0:26:59.400 --> 0:27:03.960
<v Speaker 8>next November. And so Newsome, by dint of his ability

0:27:04.080 --> 0:27:06.919
<v Speaker 8>to kind of run the table in California, get this

0:27:07.000 --> 0:27:11.119
<v Speaker 8>initiative on the ballot, has suddenly become important in preserving Democrats'

0:27:11.240 --> 0:27:14.320
<v Speaker 8>chance to win back some shred of power to confront

0:27:14.359 --> 0:27:17.080
<v Speaker 8>Donald Trump with next November, and of course that would

0:27:17.119 --> 0:27:21.760
<v Speaker 8>vault Newsom himself into even more prominent role as Democrats

0:27:21.800 --> 0:27:24.080
<v Speaker 8>look for somebody to lead the party in twenty twenty

0:27:24.119 --> 0:27:26.200
<v Speaker 8>eight and out of the Trump era.

0:27:26.320 --> 0:27:29.320
<v Speaker 1>Does that proposition have widespread support in California right now?

0:27:29.359 --> 0:27:32.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean, former Governor Ronald Schwarzenegger has spoken out recently

0:27:32.560 --> 0:27:34.560
<v Speaker 1>against it. What did you find in your reporting?

0:27:35.240 --> 0:27:36.800
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, it's not clear that it does.

0:27:36.880 --> 0:27:39.320
<v Speaker 8>I mean, what's going on, just to kind of clue

0:27:39.359 --> 0:27:41.560
<v Speaker 8>in viewers, is that Trump and Republicans have been very

0:27:41.640 --> 0:27:46.359
<v Speaker 8>aggressive about deciding to redraw or try and redraw congressional

0:27:46.400 --> 0:27:48.719
<v Speaker 8>districts in red states across the country as a way

0:27:48.760 --> 0:27:50.919
<v Speaker 8>of kind of putting their thumb on the scale in

0:27:51.000 --> 0:27:55.119
<v Speaker 8>midterm elections in a way that would help Republicans withstand

0:27:55.160 --> 0:27:58.639
<v Speaker 8>what I think most people expect to be an electoral backlash.

0:27:58.720 --> 0:28:02.600
<v Speaker 8>So the fear for Democrats is that Republicans essentially rewrite

0:28:02.640 --> 0:28:07.200
<v Speaker 8>the rules and you know, take control or keep control

0:28:07.240 --> 0:28:09.040
<v Speaker 8>of a House of Representatives that they think they ought

0:28:09.040 --> 0:28:11.359
<v Speaker 8>to be able to win, and so new some value

0:28:11.359 --> 0:28:12.919
<v Speaker 8>to the parties that he's been able to kind of

0:28:12.960 --> 0:28:16.760
<v Speaker 8>come in and I think offset this if this ballot

0:28:16.800 --> 0:28:19.400
<v Speaker 8>referendum wins. But it's not clear that it's winning by

0:28:19.400 --> 0:28:22.479
<v Speaker 8>a lot. The latest poll I've seen has it at

0:28:22.520 --> 0:28:26.040
<v Speaker 8>about fifty percent in favor, about thirty five thirty six

0:28:26.080 --> 0:28:28.040
<v Speaker 8>percent of pose and the rest undecided.

0:28:28.600 --> 0:28:30.280
<v Speaker 4>So it really could still swing either way.

0:28:30.280 --> 0:28:32.199
<v Speaker 8>And as you said, there have been prominent Republicans like

0:28:32.240 --> 0:28:35.199
<v Speaker 8>former Governor Arl Schwarzenegger have come out and said, no,

0:28:35.280 --> 0:28:36.639
<v Speaker 8>we don't want to do this, We don't want to

0:28:36.640 --> 0:28:38.520
<v Speaker 8>create these democratic districts.

0:28:39.040 --> 0:28:39.880
<v Speaker 4>And so we'll see.

0:28:39.920 --> 0:28:42.360
<v Speaker 8>But I think the expectation among the experts that I've

0:28:42.480 --> 0:28:46.160
<v Speaker 8>spoken to is that this probably will prevail, and if

0:28:46.160 --> 0:28:49.240
<v Speaker 8>it does, Democrats nationally, I think are going to breathe

0:28:49.280 --> 0:28:50.160
<v Speaker 8>a big sigh of relief.

0:28:50.280 --> 0:28:52.640
<v Speaker 3>Josh. We want to dig more into this profile piece

0:28:52.680 --> 0:28:55.240
<v Speaker 3>of Gavin Newsoen, but I just want to on this referendum,

0:28:55.280 --> 0:28:59.040
<v Speaker 3>this ballot referendum. How important is it to new some specifically,

0:28:59.120 --> 0:29:02.280
<v Speaker 3>how important is it to you really Democrats more broadly,

0:29:02.360 --> 0:29:05.280
<v Speaker 3>as we all are kind of looking at the upcoming

0:29:05.360 --> 0:29:07.960
<v Speaker 3>midterms and what it means and what it says about

0:29:07.960 --> 0:29:09.200
<v Speaker 3>President Trump's administration.

0:29:09.760 --> 0:29:11.800
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, it's a great question. The answer is that it's

0:29:11.920 --> 0:29:14.480
<v Speaker 8>really important to both of them. I just explained on

0:29:14.560 --> 0:29:16.920
<v Speaker 8>kind of the national democratic side why it's important. But

0:29:16.960 --> 0:29:20.880
<v Speaker 8>for Newsom himself, I think it's especially important because you know,

0:29:20.920 --> 0:29:23.080
<v Speaker 8>he is somebody who has long been thought to.

0:29:23.040 --> 0:29:24.600
<v Speaker 4>Have presidential ambitions.

0:29:24.920 --> 0:29:27.520
<v Speaker 8>Democrats are obviously looking for a new leader in twenty

0:29:27.560 --> 0:29:30.720
<v Speaker 8>twenty eight, but talking to people around Washington, around the country,

0:29:30.760 --> 0:29:34.080
<v Speaker 8>in Democratic circles, there could be literally dozens of people running.

0:29:34.440 --> 0:29:37.480
<v Speaker 8>And so if this ballot referendum does pass, it will

0:29:37.520 --> 0:29:42.280
<v Speaker 8>be a real validating credential for Newsome. He's one of

0:29:42.320 --> 0:29:45.640
<v Speaker 8>the rare Democrats right now who isn't a position of power.

0:29:45.960 --> 0:29:48.280
<v Speaker 4>And if he's able to lead his party.

0:29:48.000 --> 0:29:52.320
<v Speaker 8>To victory on this ballot initiative and help Democrats win

0:29:52.440 --> 0:29:55.400
<v Speaker 8>back the House for Representatives in twenty twenty six, he

0:29:55.440 --> 0:29:57.080
<v Speaker 8>can go out and say look like, I'm out here,

0:29:57.120 --> 0:30:00.400
<v Speaker 8>I'm fighting Trump, I'm doing things, I'm helping the Democrats party,

0:30:00.440 --> 0:30:02.800
<v Speaker 8>and that's just not something that a lot of other elected.

0:30:02.480 --> 0:30:03.800
<v Speaker 4>Democrats can say right now.

0:30:04.000 --> 0:30:05.320
<v Speaker 8>And I do think it's going to lead to a

0:30:05.360 --> 0:30:07.520
<v Speaker 8>lot of excitement and a lot of national attention and

0:30:07.600 --> 0:30:10.560
<v Speaker 8>Newsome himself, as I mentioned, as we mentioned it some

0:30:10.680 --> 0:30:13.120
<v Speaker 8>like in the profile, has spent a lot of time

0:30:13.160 --> 0:30:16.680
<v Speaker 8>trying to raise his profile online, doing everything from you know,

0:30:16.760 --> 0:30:19.200
<v Speaker 8>YouTube to Twitch to Twitter to x to try and

0:30:19.280 --> 0:30:21.560
<v Speaker 8>raise his visibility. So I think a win on this

0:30:21.600 --> 0:30:23.520
<v Speaker 8>ballot initiative would really help him in that regard.

0:30:23.560 --> 0:30:25.680
<v Speaker 3>I always think about COVID and like how much he

0:30:25.720 --> 0:30:29.000
<v Speaker 3>became so prominent, and we covered certainly everything he did

0:30:29.120 --> 0:30:30.640
<v Speaker 3>during COVID and what was going on in the state,

0:30:30.680 --> 0:30:32.560
<v Speaker 3>but he really became a national figure.

0:30:32.720 --> 0:30:35.160
<v Speaker 1>Especially during that visit to the French laundry. As Josh

0:30:35.160 --> 0:30:38.080
<v Speaker 1>points out in his piece, which what did he call that?

0:30:38.200 --> 0:30:40.520
<v Speaker 1>In his podcast? Josh he quoted in the piece.

0:30:41.080 --> 0:30:43.200
<v Speaker 8>I think he said it was like his most boneheaded

0:30:43.240 --> 0:30:45.240
<v Speaker 8>move he made this governor, and not a lot of

0:30:45.240 --> 0:30:47.360
<v Speaker 8>people would disagree with that. But you know, he is

0:30:47.440 --> 0:30:50.520
<v Speaker 8>prone to the occasional scandal. So that's part of the

0:30:50.560 --> 0:30:53.240
<v Speaker 8>excitement of following Governor Gavin Newsom. So it does a

0:30:53.280 --> 0:30:55.280
<v Speaker 8>lot of exciting things, both for good and for better.

0:30:55.360 --> 0:30:57.320
<v Speaker 1>So let's talk about that a little bit. As a

0:30:57.400 --> 0:31:01.520
<v Speaker 1>California and I followed Gavin Newsom for decades at this point,

0:31:01.880 --> 0:31:05.600
<v Speaker 1>one thing that just always surprises me though, is where

0:31:05.600 --> 0:31:07.880
<v Speaker 1>he was and who he was with early on in

0:31:07.920 --> 0:31:10.320
<v Speaker 1>his political life. I mean, there's the famous photo shoot

0:31:10.360 --> 0:31:13.360
<v Speaker 1>was at any Lebowitz with Kimberly Gilfoyle, his former wife,

0:31:13.600 --> 0:31:16.520
<v Speaker 1>who is now you know, she was linked to one

0:31:16.520 --> 0:31:20.360
<v Speaker 1>of the Trump's sons romantically. She's now the ambassador to Greece.

0:31:22.080 --> 0:31:24.320
<v Speaker 1>What is his political history? You dive in here, there's

0:31:24.360 --> 0:31:27.440
<v Speaker 1>connections to the Getty family. You really go really far

0:31:27.480 --> 0:31:28.440
<v Speaker 1>back generations.

0:31:28.440 --> 0:31:30.080
<v Speaker 4>Actually yeah, I.

0:31:30.040 --> 0:31:32.479
<v Speaker 8>Mean he's had this fascinating life. You know, his his

0:31:32.800 --> 0:31:35.960
<v Speaker 8>father and grandfather were kind of big time political fixers

0:31:36.000 --> 0:31:39.040
<v Speaker 8>in San Francisco, which gave him entree into the kind

0:31:39.040 --> 0:31:42.960
<v Speaker 8>of wealthy world of San Francisco politics and business. While

0:31:42.960 --> 0:31:45.040
<v Speaker 8>at the same time, you know, his mom after his

0:31:45.080 --> 0:31:47.880
<v Speaker 8>parents divorce, was a single mom who worked three jobs,

0:31:48.040 --> 0:31:49.720
<v Speaker 8>so he kind of really grew up with a foot

0:31:49.760 --> 0:31:52.200
<v Speaker 8>in both worlds. I think he's always been drawn to

0:31:52.280 --> 0:31:54.320
<v Speaker 8>the camera as a politician. As he said, there's a

0:31:54.320 --> 0:31:56.600
<v Speaker 8>famous Vanity Fair cover shirt shoot back when he was

0:31:56.600 --> 0:31:59.600
<v Speaker 8>married to Kimberly Guilfoyle. You know, he managed to be

0:31:59.600 --> 0:32:03.360
<v Speaker 8>a very high profile mayor of San Francisco, conducting or

0:32:03.360 --> 0:32:06.160
<v Speaker 8>allowing gay marriages back before the Supreme Court had allowed

0:32:06.200 --> 0:32:08.000
<v Speaker 8>that first got him on the national stage. But he's

0:32:08.000 --> 0:32:11.160
<v Speaker 8>also you know, good looking, telligenic guy who really wants

0:32:11.200 --> 0:32:14.120
<v Speaker 8>to have his profile out there, and you know, has

0:32:14.160 --> 0:32:17.600
<v Speaker 8>a lot of political talent. I think that the challenge

0:32:17.600 --> 0:32:21.040
<v Speaker 8>for Newsome as governor California, and we get into this

0:32:21.080 --> 0:32:22.640
<v Speaker 8>in the piece a little bit, is that there's a

0:32:22.680 --> 0:32:24.880
<v Speaker 8>lot not to like you about California right now at

0:32:24.920 --> 0:32:27.200
<v Speaker 8>a time when you know, Americans are more and more

0:32:27.200 --> 0:32:30.600
<v Speaker 8>concerned with inflation and the high cost of living. California

0:32:30.640 --> 0:32:34.280
<v Speaker 8>has sky high home prices. It sort of struggles with

0:32:34.320 --> 0:32:36.680
<v Speaker 8>a lot of the things that Americans struggle with generally,

0:32:36.680 --> 0:32:40.760
<v Speaker 8>whether it's high gas prices, high unemployment, homelessness.

0:32:40.240 --> 0:32:43.240
<v Speaker 4>So all of these things are.

0:32:42.560 --> 0:32:46.200
<v Speaker 8>Subjects at Newsom and Business Week spoke about, talked about

0:32:46.240 --> 0:32:47.560
<v Speaker 8>and try to kind of war game out of the

0:32:47.600 --> 0:32:50.760
<v Speaker 8>piece whether this is something that he can overcome. And

0:32:51.000 --> 0:32:53.160
<v Speaker 8>as Newsome himself said too, you know, he's got a

0:32:53.160 --> 0:32:55.360
<v Speaker 8>real pitch I think for Democrats nationally, which is that

0:32:55.480 --> 0:32:59.200
<v Speaker 8>California is this engine of dynamism, whether it's tech or

0:32:59.240 --> 0:33:04.200
<v Speaker 8>AI or business, and really conducts itself in a way

0:33:04.280 --> 0:33:07.960
<v Speaker 8>that I think Newsom would describe as the polar opposite

0:33:08.000 --> 0:33:10.760
<v Speaker 8>of the way Donald Trump runs the US economy, with

0:33:10.800 --> 0:33:13.720
<v Speaker 8>a focus on kind of industrial nostalgia and looking back,

0:33:14.320 --> 0:33:16.800
<v Speaker 8>Newsom is very much a California guy, almost seems like

0:33:16.800 --> 0:33:18.880
<v Speaker 8>a venture capitalist at times, kind of.

0:33:18.880 --> 0:33:19.680
<v Speaker 4>Pitching his state.

0:33:20.040 --> 0:33:21.280
<v Speaker 8>And I think it's going to be interesting to see

0:33:21.280 --> 0:33:23.600
<v Speaker 8>whether Democratic voters connect with that and decide this is

0:33:23.600 --> 0:33:25.120
<v Speaker 8>the guy that they want leading them forward.

0:33:25.320 --> 0:33:28.040
<v Speaker 3>Josh, Dude. Democratic voters also connect with the way he's

0:33:28.160 --> 0:33:31.080
<v Speaker 3>begun using social media, kind of playing President Trump at

0:33:31.120 --> 0:33:35.400
<v Speaker 3>his own game with AI generated content and caps and

0:33:35.440 --> 0:33:36.200
<v Speaker 3>so on and so forth.

0:33:36.440 --> 0:33:38.120
<v Speaker 5>You single this out.

0:33:38.080 --> 0:33:40.680
<v Speaker 3>Certainly in the story. Does that resonate? Is that what

0:33:40.880 --> 0:33:41.760
<v Speaker 3>Democrats want?

0:33:42.720 --> 0:33:44.440
<v Speaker 8>I mean to me, this is the most interesting part

0:33:44.480 --> 0:33:46.400
<v Speaker 8>of the profile is, you know, a couple of months ago,

0:33:46.600 --> 0:33:49.160
<v Speaker 8>Newsom turned the governor's Twitter feed into this kind of

0:33:49.240 --> 0:33:51.680
<v Speaker 8>mockery of Donald Trump and the way he comports himself

0:33:51.720 --> 0:33:55.040
<v Speaker 8>on social media with these all caps tweets kind of

0:33:55.120 --> 0:33:59.200
<v Speaker 8>mocking and insulting him, and you know, AI generated images

0:33:59.240 --> 0:34:02.400
<v Speaker 8>of Trump eating MacDonald's Burger's kind of stuffing his face,

0:34:03.160 --> 0:34:05.360
<v Speaker 8>and it was basically kind of meant to get down

0:34:05.360 --> 0:34:08.960
<v Speaker 8>in the mud with Trump, and it's something that's caused

0:34:09.000 --> 0:34:11.120
<v Speaker 8>a ton of attention, a ton of engagement.

0:34:11.640 --> 0:34:12.120
<v Speaker 4>A lot of.

0:34:12.080 --> 0:34:16.000
<v Speaker 8>Democratic voters are seeing this and engaging with this online.

0:34:16.560 --> 0:34:19.040
<v Speaker 8>I know in my own life, people relatives in mine

0:34:19.040 --> 0:34:22.080
<v Speaker 8>are not particularly political, would have no reason to be

0:34:22.120 --> 0:34:24.319
<v Speaker 8>interested in Gavin Newsom were suddenly asking me about him

0:34:24.320 --> 0:34:27.319
<v Speaker 8>because of his wild social media persona. So in an

0:34:27.320 --> 0:34:30.640
<v Speaker 8>intention getting sense, I think it's helped him. Whether or

0:34:30.680 --> 0:34:33.560
<v Speaker 8>not this helps him like win votes in purple swing

0:34:33.600 --> 0:34:36.759
<v Speaker 8>states three years from now, I'm still a little bit

0:34:36.760 --> 0:34:39.959
<v Speaker 8>skeptical about that, but you know, partly the race right now,

0:34:40.160 --> 0:34:42.680
<v Speaker 8>if you're a Democrat is the race for eyeballs and attention,

0:34:43.120 --> 0:34:44.399
<v Speaker 8>and there's no question.

0:34:44.120 --> 0:34:45.919
<v Speaker 4>That Newsome is doing that kind of.

0:34:45.800 --> 0:34:48.520
<v Speaker 8>More aggressively and in a more interesting way than any

0:34:48.560 --> 0:34:50.000
<v Speaker 8>other Democrat on the scene right now.

0:34:50.120 --> 0:34:53.399
<v Speaker 1>Is it a risk politically for the constituents in California?

0:34:53.480 --> 0:34:56.040
<v Speaker 1>Karen Bass, the mayor of Los Angeles, spoke at Bloomberg

0:34:56.120 --> 0:34:58.960
<v Speaker 1>screen time earlier this month, and she talked about collaborating

0:34:59.000 --> 0:35:01.680
<v Speaker 1>with President Trump in the of the disastrous wildfires. If

0:35:01.719 --> 0:35:07.160
<v Speaker 1>there is another big natural disaster in California before Gavin

0:35:07.200 --> 0:35:09.960
<v Speaker 1>Newsom's term is up. Does he have to go begging

0:35:10.000 --> 0:35:12.600
<v Speaker 1>to President Trump? And President Trump says, no, You've made

0:35:12.600 --> 0:35:13.239
<v Speaker 1>a mockery of me.

0:35:14.120 --> 0:35:15.480
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I mean it's a good question.

0:35:15.520 --> 0:35:17.000
<v Speaker 8>I mean one of the things we talked about with

0:35:17.120 --> 0:35:19.200
<v Speaker 8>Newsom and this piece is that he essentially, you know,

0:35:19.280 --> 0:35:21.480
<v Speaker 8>Trump had kind of written him off back in January,

0:35:21.520 --> 0:35:25.160
<v Speaker 8>before he'd even taken office, had kind of turned on Newsome,

0:35:25.200 --> 0:35:27.040
<v Speaker 8>and Newsom had said, you know, in the past, they'd

0:35:27.080 --> 0:35:29.320
<v Speaker 8>had a good working relationship. Back in the twenty eighteen

0:35:29.960 --> 0:35:33.720
<v Speaker 8>Paradise fires in California, he thought Trump had been pretty helpful,

0:35:34.239 --> 0:35:36.120
<v Speaker 8>but this time around he wasn't, and Newsom had to

0:35:36.160 --> 0:35:38.360
<v Speaker 8>kind of force his way into Trump's sphere and orbit

0:35:38.680 --> 0:35:41.080
<v Speaker 8>in order to get some of the help that California needed.

0:35:41.440 --> 0:35:43.480
<v Speaker 8>I think it does run a risk when you kind

0:35:43.480 --> 0:35:46.960
<v Speaker 8>of intentionally mock and insult someone, especially as a Democratic governor,

0:35:47.200 --> 0:35:48.799
<v Speaker 8>if you need to then turn around and ask that

0:35:48.840 --> 0:35:51.479
<v Speaker 8>president for help, it could be problematic. On the other hand,

0:35:51.560 --> 0:35:55.240
<v Speaker 8>Trump as president has pursued a scorched earth policy against

0:35:55.280 --> 0:35:58.759
<v Speaker 8>just about every Democrat, every blue state, in every blue

0:35:58.840 --> 0:36:01.320
<v Speaker 8>city that I can think of, regardless of whether or

0:36:01.400 --> 0:36:05.120
<v Speaker 8>not the mayors and governors of those States have insulted

0:36:05.160 --> 0:36:08.680
<v Speaker 8>him personally and gratuitously the way Governor Newsom House. I'm

0:36:08.680 --> 0:36:10.280
<v Speaker 8>not sure in the end will make much of a difference,

0:36:10.320 --> 0:36:11.960
<v Speaker 8>but it'll certainly be something to watch if there is

0:36:12.000 --> 0:36:16.200
<v Speaker 8>another big national disaster in California that requires federal help.

0:36:17.160 --> 0:36:19.520
<v Speaker 3>Fascinating staff. I wish we had another fifteen twenty minutes.

0:36:20.000 --> 0:36:20.960
<v Speaker 6>Josh with you.

0:36:21.040 --> 0:36:24.480
<v Speaker 3>That's always the case, Josh Green, National correspondent at Bloomberg

0:36:24.520 --> 0:36:28.440
<v Speaker 3>Business This is the cover story of the issue New

0:36:28.440 --> 0:36:29.560
<v Speaker 3>Issue at Bloomberg Business Week.

0:36:29.600 --> 0:36:30.520
<v Speaker 5>Find it on newsstands.

0:36:30.600 --> 0:36:33.200
<v Speaker 3>It is on the Bloomberg and at Bloomberg dot Com.

0:36:33.480 --> 0:36:35.560
<v Speaker 3>His profile so much detail.

0:36:36.120 --> 0:36:36.560
<v Speaker 5>Love it.

0:36:41.719 --> 0:36:45.719
<v Speaker 2>You're listening to the Bloomberg Business Weekdaily Podcast. Catch us

0:36:45.760 --> 0:36:49.240
<v Speaker 2>live weekday afternoons from two to five pm Eastern. Listen

0:36:49.239 --> 0:36:52.719
<v Speaker 2>on Applecarplay and Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business app,

0:36:52.960 --> 0:36:54.760
<v Speaker 2>or watch us live on YouTube.

0:36:55.880 --> 0:36:57.919
<v Speaker 3>Plenty ahead in our second hour of the weekend edition

0:36:57.960 --> 0:37:01.600
<v Speaker 3>of Bloomberg Business Week, including a computing breakthrough from Google

0:37:01.640 --> 0:37:04.719
<v Speaker 3>when it comes to quantum computing, we check in with

0:37:04.800 --> 0:37:07.399
<v Speaker 3>the mayor of Chattanooga, Tennessee, who is looking to make

0:37:07.640 --> 0:37:09.080
<v Speaker 3>his mark in that space.

0:37:09.400 --> 0:37:13.400
<v Speaker 1>Plus Xenax in your ears, an all in one face fixer,

0:37:14.040 --> 0:37:17.400
<v Speaker 1>maybe some ketamine therapy. Those are just some cheat codes

0:37:17.440 --> 0:37:20.399
<v Speaker 1>on maybe how to improve your overall well innes It's

0:37:20.400 --> 0:37:22.279
<v Speaker 1>courtesy of our Bloomberg Pursuits team.

0:37:22.440 --> 0:37:23.960
<v Speaker 3>I'm just going to stick to getting lots of sleep

0:37:23.960 --> 0:37:24.560
<v Speaker 3>in drikutts.

0:37:25.000 --> 0:37:27.840
<v Speaker 1>I think there's okay, just to throw it out there.

0:37:27.880 --> 0:37:30.360
<v Speaker 1>There's also like the walking uphill treadmill one.

0:37:30.520 --> 0:37:33.359
<v Speaker 3>That I love, no but makes sense. Love it, yeah,

0:37:33.600 --> 0:37:35.160
<v Speaker 3>love it exactly.

0:37:34.920 --> 0:37:37.080
<v Speaker 1>Just a little just a little preview of what's to come.

0:37:36.960 --> 0:37:39.279
<v Speaker 3>All right, love it, love it all right. First up

0:37:39.320 --> 0:37:41.880
<v Speaker 3>this Hour addressing the future of work and how robots

0:37:41.920 --> 0:37:45.120
<v Speaker 3>play into that. The New York Times reported this past

0:37:45.160 --> 0:37:48.360
<v Speaker 3>week that Amazon executives believe the company is on the

0:37:48.440 --> 0:37:51.520
<v Speaker 3>cusp of its next big workplace shift, and that is

0:37:51.560 --> 0:37:54.760
<v Speaker 3>replacing more than half a million jobs with robots. So

0:37:54.880 --> 0:37:58.080
<v Speaker 3>the question will the future of work include robots or

0:37:58.239 --> 0:38:00.319
<v Speaker 3>is it all hype? I mean it already kind of

0:38:00.320 --> 0:38:01.719
<v Speaker 3>includes robots, right.

0:38:02.200 --> 0:38:04.839
<v Speaker 1>How do you know I'm not one? I don't know.

0:38:05.160 --> 0:38:06.400
<v Speaker 5>I did see you plug yourself.

0:38:06.200 --> 0:38:09.520
<v Speaker 1>In the Sometimes I feel sometimes I feel like it's

0:38:09.560 --> 0:38:11.600
<v Speaker 1>neither here nor there. Well here with more on what

0:38:11.640 --> 0:38:14.400
<v Speaker 1>Amazon is up to is Ty Brady, chief technologist at

0:38:14.440 --> 0:38:18.240
<v Speaker 1>Amazon Robotics. Ty joined us from Amazon's Delivering the Future

0:38:18.360 --> 0:38:20.680
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty five event out in California.

0:38:21.080 --> 0:38:26.239
<v Speaker 9>We are fourth Delivering the Future event here and there's

0:38:26.280 --> 0:38:28.279
<v Speaker 9>a bunch of press that we have here and we

0:38:28.360 --> 0:38:31.160
<v Speaker 9>made a couple of big announcements in robotics. The first

0:38:31.239 --> 0:38:35.479
<v Speaker 9>is in our manipulation robot that we call blue Jay.

0:38:35.840 --> 0:38:37.480
<v Speaker 9>And what blue Jay the way that you can think

0:38:37.520 --> 0:38:39.640
<v Speaker 9>of that as we can you can take three assembly

0:38:39.680 --> 0:38:41.720
<v Speaker 9>lines and put it in the same footprint of one.

0:38:42.480 --> 0:38:45.080
<v Speaker 9>What it does is help eliminate the menial, the mundane,

0:38:45.120 --> 0:38:47.480
<v Speaker 9>and the repetitive, and it could pick more than seventy

0:38:47.520 --> 0:38:49.680
<v Speaker 9>five percent of the inventory that we actually sell in

0:38:49.719 --> 0:38:52.000
<v Speaker 9>our sortable network, which is a really big deal. I'm

0:38:52.000 --> 0:38:54.239
<v Speaker 9>really proud of that. And I also say there's something

0:38:54.239 --> 0:38:56.520
<v Speaker 9>interesting about blue Jay as well as compared to our

0:38:56.600 --> 0:39:02.719
<v Speaker 9>other bird manipulation systems Sparrow and Robin, it took us

0:39:02.760 --> 0:39:06.160
<v Speaker 9>about three years to kind of design, deploy and get

0:39:06.160 --> 0:39:10.040
<v Speaker 9>out to our frontline employees. We have actually done blue

0:39:10.120 --> 0:39:13.000
<v Speaker 9>Jay with the power of AI and just over a year,

0:39:13.160 --> 0:39:15.240
<v Speaker 9>so it's really the pace of innovation.

0:39:15.760 --> 0:39:17.600
<v Speaker 1>I think one of a lot of people think about Amazon

0:39:17.680 --> 0:39:19.160
<v Speaker 1>and robots. I just want to jump in because we

0:39:19.160 --> 0:39:20.320
<v Speaker 1>don't have a ton of time, but I like that.

0:39:20.400 --> 0:39:21.920
<v Speaker 1>I want to we'll get to some of the other announcements.

0:39:22.080 --> 0:39:25.759
<v Speaker 1>They think about the Kiva Systems robots the big acquisition

0:39:25.880 --> 0:39:27.520
<v Speaker 1>at the time, you know, twenty twelve, that was a

0:39:27.520 --> 0:39:30.960
<v Speaker 1>big acquisition for Amazon, and they've seen pictures of the

0:39:30.960 --> 0:39:34.560
<v Speaker 1>way that those can move large loads of things across warehouses.

0:39:34.560 --> 0:39:36.600
<v Speaker 1>But if you were to go into a state of

0:39:36.600 --> 0:39:39.120
<v Speaker 1>the art Amazon warehouse today, what would you see That's

0:39:39.520 --> 0:39:41.560
<v Speaker 1>in addition to those Kiva robots.

0:39:42.120 --> 0:39:45.640
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, in addition to the world's first goods to person

0:39:45.719 --> 0:39:49.839
<v Speaker 9>fulfillment strategy, which was just a really good idea where

0:39:49.840 --> 0:39:52.160
<v Speaker 9>we have more than a million robots that we manufacture

0:39:52.160 --> 0:39:55.319
<v Speaker 9>action in Massachusetts doing that job every day. You're going

0:39:55.360 --> 0:39:57.640
<v Speaker 9>to see more of the unstructured fields, right, So, you're

0:39:57.680 --> 0:40:00.560
<v Speaker 9>going to see green robot that we call Proteus that

0:40:00.600 --> 0:40:06.279
<v Speaker 9>can move big cargoes of packages to the right dock

0:40:06.600 --> 0:40:09.799
<v Speaker 9>at the right time. You're going to see many more

0:40:09.840 --> 0:40:13.120
<v Speaker 9>manipulation systems that they we have in there, eliminating kind

0:40:13.120 --> 0:40:15.200
<v Speaker 9>of the repetitive motions that they we have no one

0:40:15.239 --> 0:40:17.680
<v Speaker 9>wants to lift a fifty pound box box all day,

0:40:18.000 --> 0:40:21.080
<v Speaker 9>Robin does that, Cardinal does that. Moving into some of

0:40:21.120 --> 0:40:26.960
<v Speaker 9>these proteus bound carts that we have, you're going to

0:40:27.000 --> 0:40:30.839
<v Speaker 9>see much more collaborative robotics, right. So that's where we

0:40:30.880 --> 0:40:34.440
<v Speaker 9>build our robotic systems to enable people to augment what

0:40:34.480 --> 0:40:37.239
<v Speaker 9>people are capable of. And we really believe in the

0:40:37.280 --> 0:40:41.000
<v Speaker 9>philosophy of people and machines working together. How can we

0:40:41.040 --> 0:40:44.439
<v Speaker 9>build a tool set that enables our employees to do

0:40:44.719 --> 0:40:48.040
<v Speaker 9>their job not only more efficiently, but also with better

0:40:48.080 --> 0:40:48.759
<v Speaker 9>safety in mind?

0:40:48.760 --> 0:40:50.799
<v Speaker 3>All right, So there's this robot arm called blue Jay.

0:40:50.840 --> 0:40:52.520
<v Speaker 3>You just talked about it. You know, you guys are

0:40:52.600 --> 0:40:56.840
<v Speaker 3>using this AI agent called Iluna, and then you're also

0:40:57.080 --> 0:40:59.959
<v Speaker 3>working with augmented reality glasses to be worn by dry

0:41:00.440 --> 0:41:03.399
<v Speaker 3>and delivery trucks in the field. There's like so much

0:41:03.440 --> 0:41:06.680
<v Speaker 3>going on. Step back for a moment, because you guys

0:41:06.880 --> 0:41:07.760
<v Speaker 3>have a lot of data.

0:41:07.880 --> 0:41:09.000
<v Speaker 5>You look at what you're doing.

0:41:10.000 --> 0:41:12.719
<v Speaker 3>I'm just curious investors who are thinking about Amazon and

0:41:12.760 --> 0:41:14.360
<v Speaker 3>what you are doing, how do they think about the

0:41:14.400 --> 0:41:17.560
<v Speaker 3>long term, like ROI return on investment when it comes

0:41:17.560 --> 0:41:20.480
<v Speaker 3>to the investments you guys make in robots, is the

0:41:20.520 --> 0:41:24.279
<v Speaker 3>goal about labor efficiency, through put speed or is it

0:41:24.360 --> 0:41:28.640
<v Speaker 3>margin expansion kind of tie across your fulfillment operations?

0:41:28.680 --> 0:41:29.200
<v Speaker 5>What is it?

0:41:30.680 --> 0:41:34.319
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, well, definitely the efficiency. We think about efficiencies and

0:41:34.360 --> 0:41:37.319
<v Speaker 9>how can we gain efficiency through all the chain of

0:41:37.360 --> 0:41:42.279
<v Speaker 9>our fulfillment processes for sure, And you mentioned data and

0:41:42.400 --> 0:41:45.640
<v Speaker 9>data is the fuel for AI systems. Data has allowed

0:41:45.719 --> 0:41:50.160
<v Speaker 9>us to bring think of the body of being our robotics,

0:41:50.160 --> 0:41:52.719
<v Speaker 9>but bring the mind to robotics, allowing it to be

0:41:52.760 --> 0:41:56.000
<v Speaker 9>more adaptable, more fluid. You can almost think of this

0:41:56.040 --> 0:41:59.160
<v Speaker 9>as the ability to pour our robotics systems into any

0:41:59.200 --> 0:42:04.040
<v Speaker 9>size building, scale of building to amplify what our employees

0:42:04.080 --> 0:42:06.320
<v Speaker 9>are already doing. We want to give them an amazing

0:42:06.320 --> 0:42:08.319
<v Speaker 9>tool set and we see that when we do that,

0:42:08.520 --> 0:42:11.160
<v Speaker 9>we're more productive. Right when you do robotics, right when

0:42:11.200 --> 0:42:13.320
<v Speaker 9>you do collabor of robotics where you need both people

0:42:13.320 --> 0:42:15.839
<v Speaker 9>and machines doing what they do best and they do

0:42:16.040 --> 0:42:19.440
<v Speaker 9>different things better, that it allows you to be more productive.

0:42:19.440 --> 0:42:22.000
<v Speaker 9>And when you're more productive, that allows you to invest

0:42:22.120 --> 0:42:25.120
<v Speaker 9>more in people. We've skilled more than seven hundred thousand

0:42:25.120 --> 0:42:28.359
<v Speaker 9>of our employees, which is a great stat and also

0:42:28.400 --> 0:42:31.040
<v Speaker 9>in our robotics we've expanded from the Kiva days. We've

0:42:31.040 --> 0:42:34.400
<v Speaker 9>expanded from just a movement solution to now movement and

0:42:34.480 --> 0:42:39.000
<v Speaker 9>mobility and sortation and storage and perception systems, packing systems

0:42:39.120 --> 0:42:42.520
<v Speaker 9>that have really changed the game for our customers. That's

0:42:42.520 --> 0:42:43.400
<v Speaker 9>a big deal to us.

0:42:43.480 --> 0:42:47.080
<v Speaker 3>What ty you know, well you need less workers, and

0:42:47.120 --> 0:42:49.320
<v Speaker 3>I got to bring it up. You know, The Times

0:42:49.360 --> 0:42:53.600
<v Speaker 3>had a story out They talked about interviews and a

0:42:53.640 --> 0:42:57.319
<v Speaker 3>cash of internal strategy documents that they saw that it

0:42:57.320 --> 0:43:00.799
<v Speaker 3>reveals that your execs think that the companies on the

0:43:00.800 --> 0:43:03.600
<v Speaker 3>cusp of its next big workplace shift. I'm reading from

0:43:03.640 --> 0:43:05.960
<v Speaker 3>the Times and replacing more than half a million jobs

0:43:05.960 --> 0:43:08.960
<v Speaker 3>with robots, so you know, we know things change. I'm

0:43:08.960 --> 0:43:11.200
<v Speaker 3>not in a horse and buggy anymore. I don't make

0:43:11.239 --> 0:43:14.520
<v Speaker 3>things piecemeal. I get it. I don't get tons of

0:43:14.520 --> 0:43:18.200
<v Speaker 3>faxes and I don't get tons of pieces of physical mail.

0:43:18.360 --> 0:43:22.719
<v Speaker 3>Thank god, things change. Having said that, is Amazon, do

0:43:22.800 --> 0:43:24.960
<v Speaker 3>you guys believe that you're on the cusp of a

0:43:25.000 --> 0:43:27.800
<v Speaker 3>workplace shift and that you won't need as many workers

0:43:27.880 --> 0:43:31.680
<v Speaker 3>because the advancements in robotics, Well.

0:43:31.520 --> 0:43:33.839
<v Speaker 9>There's no doubt that things change. I mean, and we're

0:43:33.840 --> 0:43:36.120
<v Speaker 9>actually really proud of that day and Amazon is that

0:43:36.719 --> 0:43:40.800
<v Speaker 9>we avoid stasis at all costs. We change and we adapt,

0:43:41.160 --> 0:43:44.680
<v Speaker 9>and the nature of tasks definitely changed. There's no doubt

0:43:44.719 --> 0:43:48.640
<v Speaker 9>about that. We are laser focused on efficiencies inside of

0:43:48.640 --> 0:43:52.359
<v Speaker 9>our buildings. But when it comes to that article, that

0:43:52.440 --> 0:43:55.200
<v Speaker 9>article was speculating ten years out right, that's a ten

0:43:55.239 --> 0:43:58.840
<v Speaker 9>year speculation, and it's hard to say what's going to

0:43:58.840 --> 0:44:00.680
<v Speaker 9>happen in the next ten years. But I can tell

0:44:00.680 --> 0:44:03.080
<v Speaker 9>you what happened in the last ten years, the last

0:44:03.080 --> 0:44:06.360
<v Speaker 9>ten years, which is when we seriously invested in robotics,

0:44:06.480 --> 0:44:09.279
<v Speaker 9>that we created hundreds of thousands of new jobs and

0:44:09.360 --> 0:44:12.400
<v Speaker 9>new job types. And there's been no employer in the

0:44:12.440 --> 0:44:17.560
<v Speaker 9>United States that has employed more people than Amazon in

0:44:17.680 --> 0:44:20.400
<v Speaker 9>ten years. I mean, that's and that's the power of

0:44:21.440 --> 0:44:25.359
<v Speaker 9>efficiencies and building your robots in way that's applied and

0:44:25.400 --> 0:44:27.960
<v Speaker 9>real that actually augments the human potential.

0:44:28.040 --> 0:44:29.680
<v Speaker 3>All Right, my brother Sam, I like a dog with

0:44:29.680 --> 0:44:32.960
<v Speaker 3>a bone. So does that mean ten years out it

0:44:32.960 --> 0:44:36.120
<v Speaker 3>could be less jobs or we just don't know or

0:44:36.160 --> 0:44:38.520
<v Speaker 3>you don't think that's the case, Well you.

0:44:38.520 --> 0:44:41.560
<v Speaker 9>Have to think about I mean, there's jobs and there's tasks, right,

0:44:41.600 --> 0:44:44.440
<v Speaker 9>so of course we're changing the nature of tasks. Like

0:44:44.480 --> 0:44:48.759
<v Speaker 9>I'm very bullish on eliminating every menial, mundane and repetitive

0:44:48.840 --> 0:44:51.120
<v Speaker 9>job out there. Nobody wants to do that, so we're

0:44:51.160 --> 0:44:54.319
<v Speaker 9>going to change those tasks one hundred percent. But we

0:44:54.400 --> 0:44:57.920
<v Speaker 9>can again, as history has shown, we continue to create

0:44:58.040 --> 0:45:01.160
<v Speaker 9>jobs right with the goal of two things. Can you

0:45:01.200 --> 0:45:03.640
<v Speaker 9>have it all? Can you be more productive which means

0:45:03.640 --> 0:45:06.240
<v Speaker 9>more efficiency, and can you also create a safer environment

0:45:06.280 --> 0:45:09.200
<v Speaker 9>for employees? And we're actually doing both. That's what history

0:45:09.239 --> 0:45:11.640
<v Speaker 9>has shown. In the last ten years. We have created

0:45:11.920 --> 0:45:16.720
<v Speaker 9>better than thirty percent reduction in our overall recordable injury

0:45:16.800 --> 0:45:19.840
<v Speaker 9>rate over the last five years because of our robotics

0:45:20.400 --> 0:45:24.200
<v Speaker 9>and also much more efficient. For example, our latest generation

0:45:25.040 --> 0:45:28.120
<v Speaker 9>filment center in shreport is twenty five percent more efficient.

0:45:28.360 --> 0:45:30.160
<v Speaker 9>You can have it all, but you have to build

0:45:30.200 --> 0:45:32.680
<v Speaker 9>your robotics in the right way that empowers people.

0:45:33.200 --> 0:45:36.680
<v Speaker 1>We're speaking with Ty Brady, chief technologist at Amazon Robotics.

0:45:36.960 --> 0:45:40.040
<v Speaker 1>When we think about hiring for these one off or

0:45:40.120 --> 0:45:44.200
<v Speaker 1>seasonal events like the holiday season, our Amazon Prime Day,

0:45:44.760 --> 0:45:48.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm wondering how you're putting pencil to paper right now

0:45:48.120 --> 0:45:50.880
<v Speaker 1>and thinking about those numbers and to what extent automation

0:45:51.320 --> 0:45:56.480
<v Speaker 1>has reduced Amazon's dependency on seasonal or hourly labor for holidays,

0:45:56.480 --> 0:45:58.319
<v Speaker 1>for prime day. What does that look like or what

0:45:58.360 --> 0:45:59.959
<v Speaker 1>will that look like this year next year.

0:46:00.280 --> 0:46:04.200
<v Speaker 9>Well, it's the same philosophy of empowering employees, whether they're

0:46:04.239 --> 0:46:07.200
<v Speaker 9>temporary or the full time employees with the world's best

0:46:07.200 --> 0:46:09.680
<v Speaker 9>machines that help them do their job. It's the same philosophy.

0:46:09.760 --> 0:46:11.399
<v Speaker 9>I'm really proud of the fact that this year we're

0:46:11.400 --> 0:46:13.800
<v Speaker 9>going to offer more than two hundred and fifty thousand

0:46:14.280 --> 0:46:17.239
<v Speaker 9>temporary jobs for our employees to come in during the

0:46:17.280 --> 0:46:19.960
<v Speaker 9>holiday season. Those are good paying jobs. I'm really happy

0:46:20.000 --> 0:46:22.480
<v Speaker 9>about that, really pleased with that. And I'm really pleased

0:46:22.520 --> 0:46:24.600
<v Speaker 9>with the work that our women and men have done

0:46:24.800 --> 0:46:28.280
<v Speaker 9>in the robotics field, designing the pioneering these new physical

0:46:28.280 --> 0:46:30.800
<v Speaker 9>AI systems that help them do their jobs better.

0:46:31.360 --> 0:46:33.760
<v Speaker 3>I got to say, one thing that I've been thinking

0:46:33.800 --> 0:46:37.520
<v Speaker 3>a lot about is what's going on overseas, whether it's China,

0:46:37.560 --> 0:46:41.000
<v Speaker 3>whether it's Japan. Bloomberg has done some reporting about service

0:46:41.000 --> 0:46:43.839
<v Speaker 3>industries in Japan because they have a labor shortage that

0:46:43.880 --> 0:46:47.520
<v Speaker 3>they are leading increasingly on robotics. Have you been over

0:46:47.520 --> 0:46:49.759
<v Speaker 3>there and looking at what they're doing, And I'm just

0:46:49.880 --> 0:46:54.160
<v Speaker 3>curious if you're seeing some things that are pretty impressive,

0:46:54.200 --> 0:46:58.560
<v Speaker 3>and that the US, as a creator of things or

0:46:58.880 --> 0:47:02.480
<v Speaker 3>its role in the robotics industry, has to keep a watch.

0:47:02.280 --> 0:47:03.680
<v Speaker 5>On what's going on in other countries.

0:47:04.880 --> 0:47:05.080
<v Speaker 10>Yeah.

0:47:05.320 --> 0:47:08.640
<v Speaker 9>I think it's easy, especially in robotis, to get distracted

0:47:08.840 --> 0:47:12.600
<v Speaker 9>about what other people are doing. I think anybody can

0:47:12.600 --> 0:47:14.759
<v Speaker 9>make a YouTube video. I think anybody can kind of

0:47:15.080 --> 0:47:19.399
<v Speaker 9>pop in and overflate something. But if you come into

0:47:19.440 --> 0:47:22.520
<v Speaker 9>our world, our world is all about application. So final

0:47:22.520 --> 0:47:26.160
<v Speaker 9>thoughts is that robotics when done the right way, when

0:47:26.200 --> 0:47:29.600
<v Speaker 9>you reframe your relationship with machines, you can enable more productivity,

0:47:29.840 --> 0:47:33.920
<v Speaker 9>create greater efficiencies, and create a more safer environment for employees.

0:47:34.160 --> 0:47:36.879
<v Speaker 9>And this collaborative mindset that we've had that we've done

0:47:36.920 --> 0:47:39.879
<v Speaker 9>for the last ten years really does make the day.

0:47:39.960 --> 0:47:42.640
<v Speaker 3>Ty Brady over at Amazon so appreciate it.

0:47:44.600 --> 0:47:48.439
<v Speaker 2>This is the Bloomberg Business Week Daily Podcast. Listen live

0:47:48.560 --> 0:47:51.280
<v Speaker 2>each weekday starting at two pm e sternup on Apple

0:47:51.320 --> 0:47:54.359
<v Speaker 2>car Play and the Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business app.

0:47:54.440 --> 0:47:57.239
<v Speaker 2>You can also listen live on Amazon Alexa from our

0:47:57.239 --> 0:48:01.400
<v Speaker 2>flagship New York station, just Say Alexa Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:48:02.200 --> 0:48:04.839
<v Speaker 3>Some news this past week in the world of quantum computing.

0:48:05.160 --> 0:48:08.439
<v Speaker 3>Google ran an algorithm on its Willow quantum computing chip

0:48:08.480 --> 0:48:11.560
<v Speaker 3>that can be repeated on similar platforms and now performed

0:48:11.560 --> 0:48:15.480
<v Speaker 3>classical supercomputers. A breakthrough, it said, clears a path for

0:48:15.640 --> 0:48:19.440
<v Speaker 3>useful applications of quantum technology within five years.

0:48:19.800 --> 0:48:22.600
<v Speaker 1>The folks in Chattanooga, Tennessee, have been thinking about quantum

0:48:22.600 --> 0:48:26.239
<v Speaker 1>computing for years. The first commercially available quantum network in

0:48:26.280 --> 0:48:28.440
<v Speaker 1>the US was established there. That was back in twenty

0:48:28.480 --> 0:48:31.880
<v Speaker 1>twenty two. We should also note that last year Bloomberg

0:48:31.920 --> 0:48:35.640
<v Speaker 1>Philanthropy is named Chattanooga one of twenty five cities selected

0:48:35.680 --> 0:48:39.800
<v Speaker 1>for its American Sustainable Cities Program. Bloomberg Philanthropies is founded

0:48:39.840 --> 0:48:42.400
<v Speaker 1>and supported by Michael R. Bloomberg, the founder and majority

0:48:42.440 --> 0:48:43.839
<v Speaker 1>owner of Bloomberg LP.

0:48:44.120 --> 0:48:47.799
<v Speaker 3>Now Chattanooga Sustainable Cities program still ongoing, and so we

0:48:47.840 --> 0:48:51.200
<v Speaker 3>wanted an update on their quantum network. Back with us

0:48:51.400 --> 0:48:55.920
<v Speaker 3>was Tim Kelly, Mayor of Chattanooga, Tennessee. Also Janet Raeberg,

0:48:56.280 --> 0:48:59.960
<v Speaker 3>President and CEO Elective EPB, formerly known as the Electric

0:49:00.120 --> 0:49:03.960
<v Speaker 3>Power Board of Chattanooga. That company it provides energy, internet,

0:49:04.000 --> 0:49:07.920
<v Speaker 3>phone and more in and around Chattanooga. The environment today,

0:49:08.640 --> 0:49:12.719
<v Speaker 3>how is it in terms of running your city, being

0:49:12.719 --> 0:49:15.360
<v Speaker 3>a mayor in a political environment that's a tough one,

0:49:15.680 --> 0:49:17.479
<v Speaker 3>an economic environment that may be tough.

0:49:17.640 --> 0:49:20.640
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, it's tough, but you know, running cities is an

0:49:20.680 --> 0:49:25.160
<v Speaker 10>eminently practical exercise. And I will say, you know, our

0:49:25.239 --> 0:49:29.480
<v Speaker 10>mayor's races are nonpartisan. They always have been, and I stayed.

0:49:29.239 --> 0:49:29.800
<v Speaker 4>In that lane.

0:49:30.120 --> 0:49:33.680
<v Speaker 10>Again, I mean, I'm not here to catalog my political beliefs.

0:49:33.760 --> 0:49:36.279
<v Speaker 10>They're pretty confusing to most people anyway. I'd say, you know,

0:49:36.560 --> 0:49:39.200
<v Speaker 10>Republicans think I'm a Democratic, and Democrats think I'm a Republican.

0:49:39.239 --> 0:49:41.719
<v Speaker 10>I'm probably doing a pretty good job. So you know,

0:49:41.840 --> 0:49:44.600
<v Speaker 10>I look, that has served me well in this environment,

0:49:44.640 --> 0:49:47.920
<v Speaker 10>because again I believe, as does a lot of folks

0:49:47.920 --> 0:49:51.399
<v Speaker 10>of Bloomberg as do rather, but that cities are really

0:49:51.719 --> 0:49:54.719
<v Speaker 10>the foundation of our economy. I swear ninety percent of

0:49:54.719 --> 0:49:57.720
<v Speaker 10>the GDP's generateds we're all innovations generated. So I'm focused

0:49:57.719 --> 0:50:01.120
<v Speaker 10>on whatever is best for Chattanooga. So I can work

0:50:01.160 --> 0:50:03.200
<v Speaker 10>and have managed to work with people on both sides

0:50:03.200 --> 0:50:05.000
<v Speaker 10>of the aisle, and you know, in the best interest

0:50:05.040 --> 0:50:05.600
<v Speaker 10>of my city.

0:50:05.719 --> 0:50:09.400
<v Speaker 1>Do you find yourself getting pulled into the social issues

0:50:09.400 --> 0:50:12.520
<v Speaker 1>that seem to define our era right now? The stuff

0:50:12.520 --> 0:50:15.520
<v Speaker 1>that does dominate cable news, whether you're talking about the

0:50:15.560 --> 0:50:16.200
<v Speaker 1>right or the left.

0:50:16.360 --> 0:50:20.239
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, I mean I find myself, you know, I find

0:50:20.239 --> 0:50:22.120
<v Speaker 10>people attempting to pull me into those but I think

0:50:22.120 --> 0:50:24.920
<v Speaker 10>I've gotten pretty good at wrestling my way out of

0:50:24.960 --> 0:50:28.760
<v Speaker 10>them and trying to just translate back into simple terms.

0:50:28.840 --> 0:50:31.480
<v Speaker 10>You know, is this what's best for the city? You know,

0:50:31.600 --> 0:50:33.600
<v Speaker 10>does it work or does it not work? I mean,

0:50:33.640 --> 0:50:36.920
<v Speaker 10>sometimes you can't avoid those political issues. It's not as though,

0:50:37.719 --> 0:50:40.760
<v Speaker 10>you know, I don't have my own beliefs. But again,

0:50:40.800 --> 0:50:43.080
<v Speaker 10>I think you, just as a mayor, have to take

0:50:43.640 --> 0:50:46.239
<v Speaker 10>a thoroughly practical approach to what's going to work best

0:50:46.280 --> 0:50:46.719
<v Speaker 10>for the city.

0:50:46.800 --> 0:50:48.400
<v Speaker 3>All right, So when you think about what's best for

0:50:48.440 --> 0:50:50.480
<v Speaker 3>the city, let's talk about that, because you are on

0:50:50.520 --> 0:50:52.799
<v Speaker 3>the ground talking to people what they need, what you

0:50:52.840 --> 0:50:55.320
<v Speaker 3>need to make sure you have a good economy, strong economy,

0:50:55.360 --> 0:50:58.480
<v Speaker 3>not just today but in the future. That quantum computing

0:50:58.520 --> 0:51:00.480
<v Speaker 3>that you made it back in twenty twenty to tell

0:51:00.560 --> 0:51:02.640
<v Speaker 3>us about, kind of give us an update for someone

0:51:02.680 --> 0:51:05.520
<v Speaker 3>who didn't hear the conversation when you were last on

0:51:05.560 --> 0:51:07.760
<v Speaker 3>with this kind of where you guys are with us.

0:51:07.680 --> 0:51:10.279
<v Speaker 10>So I'll give you the cliff notes version, which is

0:51:10.320 --> 0:51:14.360
<v Speaker 10>that you know, we took advantage of a large federal

0:51:14.920 --> 0:51:18.239
<v Speaker 10>low interest loan way back when during Clinton and Gore

0:51:19.400 --> 0:51:22.160
<v Speaker 10>to put in a giant municipal fibre network, and that

0:51:22.239 --> 0:51:25.360
<v Speaker 10>gave us the first and fastest municipal fiber network in

0:51:25.360 --> 0:51:27.400
<v Speaker 10>the country. We had a lot of folks move in

0:51:27.480 --> 0:51:29.360
<v Speaker 10>during COVID because you know, you can get one gig

0:51:29.400 --> 0:51:31.959
<v Speaker 10>of symmetrical speed for sixty seven bucks a month.

0:51:32.120 --> 0:51:33.120
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, pretty great.

0:51:33.160 --> 0:51:35.239
<v Speaker 10>You can get twenty five gigs of speed at your

0:51:35.280 --> 0:51:38.440
<v Speaker 10>house in Chattanooga. But it turns out that you can

0:51:38.480 --> 0:51:41.560
<v Speaker 10>also do quantum computing on large loops of dark fiber,

0:51:42.080 --> 0:51:45.719
<v Speaker 10>one particular type that uses photons and trapped ions, which

0:51:45.760 --> 0:51:49.480
<v Speaker 10>is where ion Q began to become interested in Chattanooga.

0:51:49.560 --> 0:51:51.840
<v Speaker 10>So we opened and Janet can talk more about it.

0:51:52.040 --> 0:51:55.360
<v Speaker 10>The first commercially available quantum network, and it is starting

0:51:55.400 --> 0:51:57.040
<v Speaker 10>to attract a lot of investment and attention.

0:51:57.280 --> 0:51:58.880
<v Speaker 1>So Janet, come on in here, because one thing that

0:51:58.920 --> 0:52:01.440
<v Speaker 1>we're trying to understand is what the practical applications of

0:52:01.520 --> 0:52:04.120
<v Speaker 1>quantum technology are. We spoke with Ed Ludlow the coast

0:52:04.120 --> 0:52:07.200
<v Speaker 1>of our Bloomberg Tech program a little earlier and Carol agreed,

0:52:07.239 --> 0:52:09.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean you thought healthcare first, he said healthcare also,

0:52:09.800 --> 0:52:12.319
<v Speaker 1>this is one area of application, but it's still kind

0:52:12.360 --> 0:52:15.120
<v Speaker 1>of the world where we're thinking about what this tech

0:52:15.120 --> 0:52:17.920
<v Speaker 1>can do, not necessarily seeing what it can do. Have

0:52:18.000 --> 0:52:22.320
<v Speaker 1>we seen any material things be developed as a result

0:52:22.400 --> 0:52:24.480
<v Speaker 1>of this technology and what you're doing in Chattanooga.

0:52:24.600 --> 0:52:26.319
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, So ian Q has been working on a lot

0:52:26.360 --> 0:52:29.880
<v Speaker 11>of different type of application with different industry, and so

0:52:29.920 --> 0:52:32.080
<v Speaker 11>we were interested because we're in an electric company and

0:52:32.160 --> 0:52:33.719
<v Speaker 11>so we have all the data for them to help

0:52:33.800 --> 0:52:36.640
<v Speaker 11>us optimize our grid. So we're doing a partnership actually

0:52:36.719 --> 0:52:39.960
<v Speaker 11>with Ionq, Nvidia, and Oakridge National Lab as a full

0:52:39.960 --> 0:52:43.400
<v Speaker 11>way partnership to help do use hybrid computing until quantum

0:52:43.440 --> 0:52:46.120
<v Speaker 11>computing can get to where it needs to be to

0:52:46.160 --> 0:52:48.560
<v Speaker 11>help us with some grid optimization problem that we can't

0:52:48.560 --> 0:52:49.880
<v Speaker 11>solve today in.

0:52:49.960 --> 0:52:52.200
<v Speaker 3>Terms of energy demands. Tell us about that. That is

0:52:52.239 --> 0:52:55.000
<v Speaker 3>like what you are seeing front and center. The AI

0:52:55.120 --> 0:52:58.279
<v Speaker 3>conversation narrative has moved from the spend and chips and

0:52:58.320 --> 0:53:00.600
<v Speaker 3>so on and so forth, like to basically, all right,

0:53:00.600 --> 0:53:02.359
<v Speaker 3>do we have enough power to do all of this?

0:53:02.920 --> 0:53:06.760
<v Speaker 3>And there is certainly a power scramble among the big hyperscalers.

0:53:06.880 --> 0:53:08.120
<v Speaker 3>What are you seeing on that front?

0:53:08.239 --> 0:53:10.760
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, and I think that's a nationwide, you know, issue

0:53:10.760 --> 0:53:13.200
<v Speaker 11>with with the energy problem. And as AI gets better

0:53:13.239 --> 0:53:16.839
<v Speaker 11>as an energy problem, right, Yeah, I mean as AI

0:53:16.880 --> 0:53:18.920
<v Speaker 11>gets better and better the more energy that it's going

0:53:19.000 --> 0:53:21.600
<v Speaker 11>to need. And so that's where quantum comes in. Very

0:53:21.640 --> 0:53:25.120
<v Speaker 11>important to the part of that solution is that quantum computer,

0:53:25.239 --> 0:53:27.400
<v Speaker 11>once it gets to the phase that it needs to be,

0:53:27.880 --> 0:53:30.400
<v Speaker 11>is it can solve things at a much faster rate,

0:53:30.719 --> 0:53:34.200
<v Speaker 11>which uses less energy than a classical computer because it

0:53:34.239 --> 0:53:37.400
<v Speaker 11>can do things in parallel versus sequential as a classical computer.

0:53:37.480 --> 0:53:40.120
<v Speaker 1>Today, Where do you get the energy that you sell

0:53:40.160 --> 0:53:41.600
<v Speaker 1>to people in and around Chattenoga?

0:53:41.680 --> 0:53:44.640
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, so we buy it from TVA Tennessee Valley Authority,

0:53:45.000 --> 0:53:47.080
<v Speaker 11>and so they generate the power and we distribute it

0:53:47.080 --> 0:53:47.720
<v Speaker 11>to our customers.

0:53:47.760 --> 0:53:48.719
<v Speaker 4>How do they generate it?

0:53:48.920 --> 0:53:52.640
<v Speaker 11>They have a diverse mix of portfolio from hydro, different

0:53:52.640 --> 0:53:56.960
<v Speaker 11>types of renewables to natural gas, and so you know

0:53:57.000 --> 0:53:58.840
<v Speaker 11>they're continuing to look at other options.

0:53:58.880 --> 0:54:00.359
<v Speaker 1>Do you see that mixed going now?

0:54:00.400 --> 0:54:02.080
<v Speaker 10>I was just going to say, they're also very much

0:54:02.120 --> 0:54:03.920
<v Speaker 10>on the front foot in terms of advanced.

0:54:03.640 --> 0:54:05.879
<v Speaker 1>Nuclear Do you see that mix?

0:54:06.080 --> 0:54:06.759
<v Speaker 4>This is either of you.

0:54:06.760 --> 0:54:10.240
<v Speaker 1>Do you see that mixed changing and focusing less unrenewables

0:54:10.280 --> 0:54:13.239
<v Speaker 1>more on nuclear as a result of the changes out

0:54:13.280 --> 0:54:13.920
<v Speaker 1>of Washington.

0:54:14.239 --> 0:54:17.160
<v Speaker 10>I think you're going to see that, you know, and again,

0:54:17.640 --> 0:54:19.840
<v Speaker 10>regardless of your political affiliation, if you just kind of

0:54:19.840 --> 0:54:22.479
<v Speaker 10>look at the math, there's no way around nuclear, right.

0:54:22.760 --> 0:54:26.480
<v Speaker 10>I do think they are giving us or EPB more

0:54:26.560 --> 0:54:28.920
<v Speaker 10>latitude to generate some of our own power because of

0:54:28.960 --> 0:54:31.719
<v Speaker 10>the anticipated demands. And I think we still have a

0:54:31.719 --> 0:54:34.160
<v Speaker 10>lot of headway on solar, So I mean, I think

0:54:34.200 --> 0:54:36.480
<v Speaker 10>we'll contin and we've got a lot of things we

0:54:36.480 --> 0:54:38.560
<v Speaker 10>can do with hydro. We're going to actually start using

0:54:38.920 --> 0:54:43.120
<v Speaker 10>biogas at our wastewater treatment plant to generate electricity. So

0:54:43.160 --> 0:54:45.440
<v Speaker 10>we're looking at any in all ways that we can generate.

0:54:45.600 --> 0:54:47.960
<v Speaker 3>Because my understanding when we talk about SMRs, the small

0:54:48.000 --> 0:54:50.719
<v Speaker 3>modular reactors, it's ten fifteen.

0:54:50.840 --> 0:54:53.640
<v Speaker 1>Will remind us, Will Wage reminds us who covers this

0:54:53.719 --> 0:54:55.879
<v Speaker 1>here at Bloomberg News that we're not there right now,

0:54:55.960 --> 0:54:57.960
<v Speaker 1>it's a while we are not, but we have a

0:54:58.000 --> 0:55:02.280
<v Speaker 1>pretty significant nuclear footprint with TVA already in the tendency.

0:55:02.360 --> 0:55:03.960
<v Speaker 3>What would you tell people who are still kind of

0:55:03.960 --> 0:55:07.000
<v Speaker 3>nervous when it comes to the nuclear footprint that you

0:55:07.000 --> 0:55:10.399
<v Speaker 3>guys have. You know what you know, fine, people do it, Okay,

0:55:10.400 --> 0:55:12.200
<v Speaker 3>do it across the country or do it in another country.

0:55:12.239 --> 0:55:13.920
<v Speaker 5>But you know the feeling here in the I mean, I.

0:55:13.840 --> 0:55:16.279
<v Speaker 1>Grew up next to a nuclear power planet. But I'm fine, right,

0:55:16.520 --> 0:55:17.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm a little weird.

0:55:18.800 --> 0:55:20.399
<v Speaker 5>But what would you say about that?

0:55:20.680 --> 0:55:23.640
<v Speaker 10>I mean, the technology has come a long long way. Yeah,

0:55:24.000 --> 0:55:25.560
<v Speaker 10>that's what I would say. Man, I'd say, go do

0:55:25.640 --> 0:55:26.720
<v Speaker 10>your research, do your homework.

0:55:26.719 --> 0:55:27.040
<v Speaker 4>They're not.

0:55:27.200 --> 0:55:29.160
<v Speaker 10>I mean, that's why we have these discussions, That's why we.

0:55:29.160 --> 0:55:29.640
<v Speaker 4>Have the fears.

0:55:29.680 --> 0:55:33.719
<v Speaker 10>But but there's just not absent fusion. I will say

0:55:33.719 --> 0:55:36.520
<v Speaker 10>the state in the University of Tennessee is also working

0:55:36.600 --> 0:55:40.239
<v Speaker 10>very very hard on fusion technology. Absent that breakthrough, there's

0:55:40.280 --> 0:55:40.600
<v Speaker 10>really not.

0:55:40.960 --> 0:55:41.840
<v Speaker 5>That's what I'm waiting for you.

0:55:42.480 --> 0:55:45.560
<v Speaker 1>When we're talking about quantum today and we're talking about Google,

0:55:45.560 --> 0:55:48.600
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about Silicon Valley. How do you get people

0:55:48.640 --> 0:55:53.160
<v Speaker 1>to think about Chattanooga, Tennessee, and not Silicon Valley, not

0:55:53.360 --> 0:55:56.520
<v Speaker 1>New York City, not Austin, Texas when they're thinking about

0:55:56.520 --> 0:55:59.120
<v Speaker 1>where they want to live to have a job in technology.

0:56:00.120 --> 0:56:02.799
<v Speaker 10>Coming on Bloomberg is a great first step. No, I mean, look,

0:56:02.840 --> 0:56:04.600
<v Speaker 10>we talk about this all the time. It's a mid

0:56:04.640 --> 0:56:06.920
<v Speaker 10>side Southern city with kind of a funny name, and

0:56:06.960 --> 0:56:09.719
<v Speaker 10>there's a bit of cognitive dissonance there. So you know, look,

0:56:09.719 --> 0:56:11.480
<v Speaker 10>we are out telling the story. I mean, I was

0:56:11.560 --> 0:56:14.240
<v Speaker 10>just in Detroit last week at a sustainable mobility conference.

0:56:14.880 --> 0:56:17.319
<v Speaker 10>We were at the Quantum World Congress. I mean, at

0:56:17.320 --> 0:56:19.839
<v Speaker 10>some point it's you know, the evidence is mounting. We

0:56:19.880 --> 0:56:22.360
<v Speaker 10>are it's not just smoke. We are doing the work

0:56:22.480 --> 0:56:23.240
<v Speaker 10>and it's working.

0:56:23.400 --> 0:56:23.840
<v Speaker 6>Is it? Is it?

0:56:23.880 --> 0:56:26.480
<v Speaker 1>If you build it, they will come mentality, I think,

0:56:26.520 --> 0:56:27.400
<v Speaker 1>So have they come?

0:56:27.719 --> 0:56:28.560
<v Speaker 6>Yes, they have come.

0:56:28.560 --> 0:56:31.400
<v Speaker 10>I mean again we had you know, we now have

0:56:31.640 --> 0:56:34.319
<v Speaker 10>independent verification that you know, ten twelve thousand people moved

0:56:34.320 --> 0:56:38.600
<v Speaker 10>to Chattanooga during the pandemic very you know, degree talented

0:56:38.600 --> 0:56:42.040
<v Speaker 10>people that could work remotely. And I think again, our job,

0:56:42.120 --> 0:56:44.400
<v Speaker 10>my job as mayor, is to help break that glass

0:56:44.440 --> 0:56:46.960
<v Speaker 10>ceiling so that we have the level of business investment

0:56:47.120 --> 0:56:50.840
<v Speaker 10>and again can build up our academic horsepower to be

0:56:50.880 --> 0:56:52.800
<v Speaker 10>able to sustain those knowledge economy jobs.

0:56:52.880 --> 0:56:55.319
<v Speaker 3>Jenna, you know, when we think about quantum computing, we

0:56:55.360 --> 0:56:57.439
<v Speaker 3>spend so much time to talking about you know, large

0:56:57.480 --> 0:57:00.200
<v Speaker 3>language models and generative AI and kind of where that's

0:57:00.360 --> 0:57:05.400
<v Speaker 3>agentic AI. You just talked about the power aspect or

0:57:05.520 --> 0:57:08.080
<v Speaker 3>the use of less power when it comes to quantum computing.

0:57:08.120 --> 0:57:13.360
<v Speaker 3>But I mean, should our conversation be shifting in terms

0:57:13.440 --> 0:57:16.000
<v Speaker 3>of what we are having for an investing audience when

0:57:16.040 --> 0:57:20.720
<v Speaker 3>we talk just so much about AI generally versus quantum Well, I.

0:57:20.720 --> 0:57:23.160
<v Speaker 11>Think that with quantum computer, when it gets to you know,

0:57:23.160 --> 0:57:24.760
<v Speaker 11>at the level it needs to be, you can team

0:57:24.800 --> 0:57:28.080
<v Speaker 11>it up with AI and get even more powerful algorithm

0:57:28.080 --> 0:57:29.479
<v Speaker 11>that comes out of it to be able to solve

0:57:29.480 --> 0:57:32.040
<v Speaker 11>more complex problems. So I don't think it's one or

0:57:32.120 --> 0:57:34.080
<v Speaker 11>the other. I think it's going to be a combined

0:57:34.360 --> 0:57:36.080
<v Speaker 11>of you know, how do you combine that and use

0:57:36.160 --> 0:57:39.080
<v Speaker 11>less energy and be able to build algorithm more efficiently.

0:57:39.400 --> 0:57:41.200
<v Speaker 3>So help me because when we talk about the data

0:57:41.200 --> 0:57:43.360
<v Speaker 3>center build out, so does that go hand in hand

0:57:43.360 --> 0:57:46.160
<v Speaker 3>with the buildout of quantum computing? Is that part of it?

0:57:46.760 --> 0:57:49.240
<v Speaker 11>So right now, it's you know, the we're building a

0:57:49.280 --> 0:57:51.439
<v Speaker 11>quantum computer to kind of learn more and be able

0:57:51.480 --> 0:57:54.440
<v Speaker 11>to help accelerate and advance that technology with companies like

0:57:54.480 --> 0:57:56.680
<v Speaker 11>ion Q, and I think once it gets to where

0:57:56.720 --> 0:57:58.760
<v Speaker 11>it needs to be, then well we can team it

0:57:58.840 --> 0:57:59.360
<v Speaker 11>up with AI.

0:57:59.680 --> 0:58:02.840
<v Speaker 10>Okay, yeah, yeah, and many of the implications with quantum.

0:58:02.880 --> 0:58:04.760
<v Speaker 3>I'm asking basic questions because I feel like we spend

0:58:04.800 --> 0:58:06.640
<v Speaker 3>so much time talking about the AI, but this is

0:58:06.640 --> 0:58:09.000
<v Speaker 3>something that increasingly is coming into the dialogue.

0:58:09.080 --> 0:58:09.240
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:58:09.240 --> 0:58:10.920
<v Speaker 10>Now, I'm just going to say the logistics is a

0:58:10.960 --> 0:58:12.920
<v Speaker 10>huge vertical in chattre Go as well, and I think

0:58:12.920 --> 0:58:16.600
<v Speaker 10>the implications for quantum for logistics have huge implications for

0:58:16.760 --> 0:58:20.280
<v Speaker 10>lower power demand and a lower carbon footprint, right, because

0:58:20.440 --> 0:58:23.080
<v Speaker 10>you're going to waste a lot less time getting stuff

0:58:23.200 --> 0:58:26.400
<v Speaker 10>from A to B. Right with root optimization we're going.

0:58:26.400 --> 0:58:27.760
<v Speaker 3>To have to do because we talk about like the

0:58:28.080 --> 0:58:32.400
<v Speaker 3>power drag or the power demand and the cost. Mayor Kelly,

0:58:32.400 --> 0:58:34.560
<v Speaker 3>I'd be remiss not to ask you you are trying

0:58:34.560 --> 0:58:37.360
<v Speaker 3>to build a city where everyone has an opportunity to

0:58:37.360 --> 0:58:39.080
<v Speaker 3>thrive and prosper. We talk so much about the case

0:58:39.080 --> 0:58:41.720
<v Speaker 3>shaped economy. There's a lot of people who aren't thriving

0:58:41.760 --> 0:58:46.000
<v Speaker 3>and prospering in this environment. Thirty five seconds, what's a

0:58:46.040 --> 0:58:47.360
<v Speaker 3>message to send to everybody?

0:58:47.760 --> 0:58:50.360
<v Speaker 10>Well, we are working very hard to reform our workforce

0:58:50.400 --> 0:58:53.560
<v Speaker 10>fillment system so that we so we don't leave folks behind.

0:58:53.560 --> 0:58:56.200
<v Speaker 10>And I think we have some significant opportunities to do that,

0:58:57.200 --> 0:58:59.240
<v Speaker 10>and we are in the midst of doing that again.

0:58:59.360 --> 0:59:01.520
<v Speaker 10>It's tough out there, Yeah, and I think it's going

0:59:01.600 --> 0:59:04.640
<v Speaker 10>to fall more to the state government and to philanthropy

0:59:04.680 --> 0:59:06.520
<v Speaker 10>frankly to kind of take up the slack in the meantime.

0:59:06.760 --> 0:59:08.240
<v Speaker 10>But I mean, we have to play the long game,

0:59:08.280 --> 0:59:10.360
<v Speaker 10>and the long game is we need some significant change

0:59:10.360 --> 0:59:13.280
<v Speaker 10>to the way that we do education workforce development in

0:59:13.280 --> 0:59:15.000
<v Speaker 10>this country so that we don't leave people behind.

0:59:15.080 --> 0:59:16.920
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it does feel like in terms of education, we're

0:59:16.920 --> 0:59:17.840
<v Speaker 3>starting to think about that.

0:59:18.560 --> 0:59:19.200
<v Speaker 6>Come back soon.

0:59:19.400 --> 0:59:22.600
<v Speaker 3>I'd love to kind of continue this conversation if we may.

0:59:23.200 --> 0:59:26.400
<v Speaker 3>Mayor Tim Kelly of Chattanooga, Tennessee, and Janet Rieberg, she's

0:59:26.400 --> 0:59:29.760
<v Speaker 3>the President's CEO elect of EP be joining us right

0:59:29.800 --> 0:59:33.840
<v Speaker 3>here in our Bloomberg Interactive Burger Studio.

0:59:36.280 --> 0:59:40.240
<v Speaker 2>You're listening to the Bloomberg Business Weekdaily Podcast. Catch us

0:59:40.320 --> 0:59:43.800
<v Speaker 2>live weekday afternoons from two to five pm Eastern Listen

0:59:43.800 --> 0:59:47.400
<v Speaker 2>on Applecarplay and Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business app,

0:59:47.520 --> 0:59:50.080
<v Speaker 2>or watch us live on YouTube.

0:59:50.400 --> 0:59:53.400
<v Speaker 3>I felt like being well has turned into another job.

0:59:53.760 --> 0:59:57.000
<v Speaker 3>From health trackers reporting our every step and snore to

0:59:57.240 --> 1:00:01.040
<v Speaker 3>pricey longevity clubs and celebrity endorse up bits. Like I say, Tim,

1:00:01.120 --> 1:00:03.680
<v Speaker 3>sometimes it feels like protecting your overall wellness can be.

1:00:04.720 --> 1:00:07.720
<v Speaker 1>A lot of work and really hard and also a

1:00:07.760 --> 1:00:13.160
<v Speaker 1>little expensive. Yeah, okay, thankfully we can cheat or maybe

1:00:13.200 --> 1:00:16.560
<v Speaker 1>boosting if that makes us feel better. Yeahat the word cheat,

1:00:16.600 --> 1:00:19.480
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. Yeah, it's so hard, I don't know. Okay,

1:00:19.480 --> 1:00:22.040
<v Speaker 1>to cheat their cheat days with us with a list

1:00:22.080 --> 1:00:24.800
<v Speaker 1>of wellness hacks to try, is the Bloomberg Pursuits Editor

1:00:24.800 --> 1:00:27.400
<v Speaker 1>at Large, Chris Rouser. It is The Pursuit's cover story

1:00:27.440 --> 1:00:30.400
<v Speaker 1>of the October issue of a business week magazine. It's

1:00:30.400 --> 1:00:34.360
<v Speaker 1>available now online, on the terminal and on news stands.

1:00:34.360 --> 1:00:36.080
<v Speaker 1>Before we get into some of the individual cheats, I

1:00:36.080 --> 1:00:36.880
<v Speaker 1>already have my favorite.

1:00:36.920 --> 1:00:38.840
<v Speaker 3>Wait, can we just say, first of all, Chris, you

1:00:38.840 --> 1:00:39.600
<v Speaker 3>look marvelous.

1:00:39.680 --> 1:00:40.960
<v Speaker 12>Oh thank oh my gosh, thank you.

1:00:40.960 --> 1:00:42.840
<v Speaker 1>You're very welcome cheating.

1:00:44.000 --> 1:00:45.480
<v Speaker 3>Now, go ahead, what's your favorite?

1:00:45.640 --> 1:00:47.560
<v Speaker 1>I just want to talk about the overall tone of

1:00:47.600 --> 1:00:50.760
<v Speaker 1>this and how it all came together, because I think it.

1:00:50.960 --> 1:00:53.480
<v Speaker 1>Is it because there's a moment happening with wellness? Or

1:00:53.520 --> 1:00:55.120
<v Speaker 1>is it because we're all getting older?

1:00:55.960 --> 1:00:56.160
<v Speaker 4>Oh?

1:00:56.200 --> 1:00:58.800
<v Speaker 12>I think both, Okay, both of those things. The reason

1:00:58.880 --> 1:01:00.760
<v Speaker 12>we uh, the reason I to look at it and

1:01:00.800 --> 1:01:03.240
<v Speaker 12>have us do a package on it was I had

1:01:03.240 --> 1:01:05.400
<v Speaker 12>a couple of injuries earlier this year where I had

1:01:05.440 --> 1:01:07.840
<v Speaker 12>a foot surgery, you guys remember, and I fractured my

1:01:07.840 --> 1:01:10.360
<v Speaker 12>elbow and I couldn't work out. And the three of us,

1:01:10.400 --> 1:01:13.040
<v Speaker 12>I know are fitness people, and when you cannot work out,

1:01:13.080 --> 1:01:14.400
<v Speaker 12>you become mentally unwell.

1:01:15.360 --> 1:01:15.960
<v Speaker 1>Very true.

1:01:16.040 --> 1:01:17.840
<v Speaker 12>And so I just and when I finally was able

1:01:17.880 --> 1:01:19.960
<v Speaker 12>to work out again, you know, I'm in my mid forties,

1:01:20.200 --> 1:01:22.720
<v Speaker 12>it's like hard to get back in shape, put muscle on,

1:01:22.800 --> 1:01:25.080
<v Speaker 12>lose weight, whatever. And I was like, you know what,

1:01:25.200 --> 1:01:28.919
<v Speaker 12>I really wish I had a little cheat something where

1:01:28.960 --> 1:01:32.240
<v Speaker 12>I could like really get back in shape faster. And

1:01:32.440 --> 1:01:35.800
<v Speaker 12>it turns out there is one. There is a stem

1:01:35.920 --> 1:01:38.680
<v Speaker 12>suit called the Catalyst suit, which is basically like one

1:01:38.680 --> 1:01:41.920
<v Speaker 12>of those as seen on TV ab zappers from the nineties,

1:01:42.600 --> 1:01:44.280
<v Speaker 12>where you put it on your whole body and it

1:01:44.440 --> 1:01:47.400
<v Speaker 12>electrocutes you while you're working out and it activates more

1:01:47.440 --> 1:01:48.160
<v Speaker 12>of your muscles.

1:01:48.880 --> 1:01:50.200
<v Speaker 5>Wait, electrocute YOUO?

1:01:50.360 --> 1:01:51.720
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, did it hurt?

1:01:52.680 --> 1:01:52.720
<v Speaker 10>It?

1:01:53.360 --> 1:01:56.240
<v Speaker 12>Hurting is not the right word. It feels. It's like

1:01:56.280 --> 1:01:58.360
<v Speaker 12>a buzz. It's a very intense buzz, and it can

1:01:58.800 --> 1:02:02.720
<v Speaker 12>be quite uncomfortable, not in a painful.

1:02:02.400 --> 1:02:03.960
<v Speaker 5>Way, like I said, but no pay, no gain.

1:02:04.120 --> 1:02:07.120
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, you really gotta get used to it. So there's

1:02:07.120 --> 1:02:10.320
<v Speaker 12>this suit that activates your muscles like supercharge your workouts

1:02:10.320 --> 1:02:13.800
<v Speaker 12>and actually can get you back in shape faster. And

1:02:13.840 --> 1:02:16.240
<v Speaker 12>so once I started doing that, I was like, well,

1:02:16.240 --> 1:02:19.120
<v Speaker 12>what other cheats are there? And I got everyone on

1:02:19.160 --> 1:02:23.520
<v Speaker 12>the team looking for different chets for wellness, fitness, eating, sleeping,

1:02:23.600 --> 1:02:23.920
<v Speaker 12>all that.

1:02:23.960 --> 1:02:24.080
<v Speaker 4>Well.

1:02:24.080 --> 1:02:25.640
<v Speaker 1>I do want to say, if you want to know

1:02:25.640 --> 1:02:28.640
<v Speaker 1>more about the stemsuit, the Catalyst. Catalyst is the company

1:02:28.680 --> 1:02:32.480
<v Speaker 1>that owns it. Brandon Kennedy's the CEO of the company

1:02:32.480 --> 1:02:34.760
<v Speaker 1>that owns the stemsuit that Chris is talking about. We

1:02:34.800 --> 1:02:37.520
<v Speaker 1>had an extending conversation with him and Chris a few

1:02:37.560 --> 1:02:39.560
<v Speaker 1>weeks ago. You can check it out on our podcast

1:02:39.600 --> 1:02:43.360
<v Speaker 1>feed to learn more. Little spoiler, Chris says, it actually works.

1:02:43.960 --> 1:02:44.800
<v Speaker 4>It works. I do.

1:02:45.040 --> 1:02:45.800
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, it's nice.

1:02:45.800 --> 1:02:48.320
<v Speaker 1>Okay, let's talk about some of these other tricks. Some

1:02:48.360 --> 1:02:52.800
<v Speaker 1>of them involved needles, that's true. Some of them involve treadmills.

1:02:52.920 --> 1:02:55.080
<v Speaker 1>I want to start with my favorite. It's old school.

1:02:55.560 --> 1:02:58.680
<v Speaker 1>It's walking up hill. Oh yeah, because you know we

1:02:58.720 --> 1:03:00.720
<v Speaker 1>think about cheats. This one doesn't even seem like a

1:03:00.760 --> 1:03:03.720
<v Speaker 1>cheat to me, because this is like keeps you in shape.

1:03:03.720 --> 1:03:06.400
<v Speaker 1>This is what you do. But apparently you can do

1:03:06.440 --> 1:03:07.680
<v Speaker 1>this three or four days a week and you're not

1:03:07.720 --> 1:03:09.440
<v Speaker 1>going to feel the effects of like having gone on

1:03:09.480 --> 1:03:10.160
<v Speaker 1>a run or something.

1:03:10.440 --> 1:03:13.040
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, so a lot of these cheats are things where

1:03:13.040 --> 1:03:14.880
<v Speaker 12>you still have to put in work. So like with

1:03:14.960 --> 1:03:17.640
<v Speaker 12>a the stemsuit the Catalyst suit, you have to exercise,

1:03:17.760 --> 1:03:20.400
<v Speaker 12>but just to exercise while you're getting electrocuted, so it

1:03:20.440 --> 1:03:23.080
<v Speaker 12>works better. And walking up hill is an old school

1:03:23.120 --> 1:03:26.560
<v Speaker 12>thing that like celebrity trainers tell people to do because

1:03:26.600 --> 1:03:28.880
<v Speaker 12>it burns calories a lot, but it also doesn't wear

1:03:28.920 --> 1:03:30.360
<v Speaker 12>you out. So if you're doing if you need to

1:03:30.400 --> 1:03:32.360
<v Speaker 12>save your energy for big lifts because you're trying to

1:03:32.360 --> 1:03:35.440
<v Speaker 12>become like a Marvel superhero, you don't want to be

1:03:35.520 --> 1:03:38.160
<v Speaker 12>running a lot and that also burns that also like

1:03:38.160 --> 1:03:40.560
<v Speaker 12>gets in the way of building muscle, whereas walking uphill

1:03:40.960 --> 1:03:43.360
<v Speaker 12>is great, it's not too strenuous, but that's like really

1:03:43.360 --> 1:03:44.360
<v Speaker 12>the best way to burn fat.

1:03:44.440 --> 1:03:44.800
<v Speaker 4>I love that.

1:03:44.840 --> 1:03:47.120
<v Speaker 3>I also like the soul renewal. I feel like, you know,

1:03:47.840 --> 1:03:49.440
<v Speaker 3>when I think about massages, I'm like, you're gonna do

1:03:49.480 --> 1:03:53.040
<v Speaker 3>my feet right, So, but this is so easy, Like

1:03:53.720 --> 1:03:55.760
<v Speaker 3>if you do pet they often say, roll your foot

1:03:55.760 --> 1:03:56.160
<v Speaker 3>on a ball.

1:03:56.280 --> 1:03:58.080
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, this is just rolling your foot on a ball.

1:03:58.160 --> 1:03:59.960
<v Speaker 12>Not only does it make your feet feel better, which

1:04:00.000 --> 1:04:02.720
<v Speaker 12>actually makes your whole, your whole walking around feel better,

1:04:02.720 --> 1:04:06.160
<v Speaker 12>but it actually can calm you down. It's actually something

1:04:06.200 --> 1:04:07.720
<v Speaker 12>that can sort of soothe your mind.

1:04:07.880 --> 1:04:09.560
<v Speaker 5>Tim, I think we should get a collection of balls

1:04:09.560 --> 1:04:10.400
<v Speaker 5>for our team.

1:04:10.800 --> 1:04:12.880
<v Speaker 1>Okay, yeah, you think that'll work.

1:04:12.760 --> 1:04:13.760
<v Speaker 5>To com you down?

1:04:13.920 --> 1:04:15.000
<v Speaker 4>You think it'll do anything.

1:04:15.120 --> 1:04:16.760
<v Speaker 5>No, we could just throw them, that's true.

1:04:16.920 --> 1:04:19.880
<v Speaker 12>The idea of this package was there's so much information

1:04:19.960 --> 1:04:21.840
<v Speaker 12>being thrown at us, like you guys said earlier, where

1:04:21.840 --> 1:04:26.240
<v Speaker 12>there's like a million manosphere podcasts talking about sleep, about eating,

1:04:26.240 --> 1:04:28.480
<v Speaker 12>about when you eat, about just every little supplement you

1:04:28.520 --> 1:04:30.320
<v Speaker 12>should take, and there's so many supplements. And you know,

1:04:30.400 --> 1:04:34.120
<v Speaker 12>BusinessWeek has covered Brian Johnson, the never Die guy who

1:04:34.200 --> 1:04:36.720
<v Speaker 12>wants to have the sort of metabolism an eighteen year

1:04:36.760 --> 1:04:40.520
<v Speaker 12>old and has like used his son's platelets injected into him.

1:04:40.520 --> 1:04:43.080
<v Speaker 12>Like it gets really crazy and it gets really expensive,

1:04:43.120 --> 1:04:44.800
<v Speaker 12>and so we were looking for things that are just

1:04:44.920 --> 1:04:47.280
<v Speaker 12>easy that you can do that actually make a difference.

1:04:47.320 --> 1:04:50.280
<v Speaker 3>That alone, to me, just men getting so involved. Like

1:04:50.400 --> 1:04:53.640
<v Speaker 3>women we kind of have always been obsessive about this stuff,

1:04:53.840 --> 1:04:55.960
<v Speaker 3>but men really getting into it and thinking about it.

1:04:56.040 --> 1:04:59.760
<v Speaker 12>Yes, because it's very quantified, it's very it becomes a hobby,

1:05:01.120 --> 1:05:05.320
<v Speaker 12>it's competitive. Yeah, it just has really like been attractive

1:05:05.320 --> 1:05:07.080
<v Speaker 12>to men for a while. This for the past few years.

1:05:07.240 --> 1:05:09.000
<v Speaker 1>Got another one that you like, well, I want I

1:05:09.440 --> 1:05:11.840
<v Speaker 1>tease that we were talking a little bit about needles

1:05:11.880 --> 1:05:15.240
<v Speaker 1>and the peptides thing kind of got my attention because

1:05:15.280 --> 1:05:19.240
<v Speaker 1>in endurance athletics, this is getting attention right now too,

1:05:19.800 --> 1:05:23.280
<v Speaker 1>along with like boosting testosterone, stuff that in the past

1:05:23.320 --> 1:05:26.000
<v Speaker 1>has been sort of dubious in terms of like competitive

1:05:26.040 --> 1:05:28.840
<v Speaker 1>rules and what has been allowed in terms of antidoping.

1:05:28.920 --> 1:05:29.960
<v Speaker 1>What's up with peptides?

1:05:30.080 --> 1:05:33.240
<v Speaker 12>So, Peptides are basically long strings of amino acids that

1:05:33.400 --> 1:05:35.520
<v Speaker 12>tell your molecule, tell your cells what to do and

1:05:35.520 --> 1:05:39.120
<v Speaker 12>how to behave and for so for like testosterone, for example,

1:05:39.480 --> 1:05:42.360
<v Speaker 12>you know you used to get testosterone injected just like

1:05:42.400 --> 1:05:45.440
<v Speaker 12>straight up testosterone. Now people are injecting things like cel

1:05:45.520 --> 1:05:48.160
<v Speaker 12>morale and which tells your body to make testosterone, which

1:05:48.200 --> 1:05:51.040
<v Speaker 12>actually is which is better because if you if your

1:05:51.080 --> 1:05:53.840
<v Speaker 12>body gets used to getting testosterone injected, it won't make

1:05:53.880 --> 1:05:56.240
<v Speaker 12>it on its own. So you know, there's there's peptides

1:05:56.280 --> 1:05:58.400
<v Speaker 12>that will do everything for make your skin more tan,

1:05:59.640 --> 1:06:01.600
<v Speaker 12>you know, make you sleep better at all this stuff,

1:06:01.640 --> 1:06:04.400
<v Speaker 12>and then we go v and ozempic. Those are peptides.

1:06:04.640 --> 1:06:05.800
<v Speaker 1>Which I did not know.

1:06:07.120 --> 1:06:08.400
<v Speaker 5>That was kind of eye opening for me.

1:06:08.560 --> 1:06:10.479
<v Speaker 12>So yeah, So there's a lot of kind of off

1:06:10.560 --> 1:06:12.640
<v Speaker 12>label on label things that are going around, and the

1:06:12.640 --> 1:06:16.080
<v Speaker 12>big most popular one is NAD or NAD plus. And

1:06:16.200 --> 1:06:18.880
<v Speaker 12>doctors caution that when you're getting this from like an

1:06:18.920 --> 1:06:22.439
<v Speaker 12>internet company that that you know has doctors, you still

1:06:22.480 --> 1:06:25.040
<v Speaker 12>really don't necessarily know what you're getting if you're ordering

1:06:25.080 --> 1:06:28.600
<v Speaker 12>this stuff online, especially if you're ordering it in a

1:06:28.880 --> 1:06:31.560
<v Speaker 12>more even more sketchyway. So if you want to get

1:06:31.560 --> 1:06:33.280
<v Speaker 12>into this stuff, definitely talk to a doctor who knows

1:06:33.280 --> 1:06:34.040
<v Speaker 12>you and that you work with.

1:06:34.080 --> 1:06:35.720
<v Speaker 3>What does the FDA say about all this? I mean,

1:06:35.720 --> 1:06:38.880
<v Speaker 3>obviously with wegov and those the GLP ones, they're regulated,

1:06:38.920 --> 1:06:39.760
<v Speaker 3>but I'm just curious.

1:06:39.880 --> 1:06:43.880
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, because of changes in rules that happened during during COVID,

1:06:43.920 --> 1:06:46.840
<v Speaker 12>basically where people can deliver this kind of stuff online,

1:06:47.000 --> 1:06:50.280
<v Speaker 12>the regulation is a lot less It's just like a

1:06:50.280 --> 1:06:51.680
<v Speaker 12>lot less tight.

1:06:51.760 --> 1:06:53.520
<v Speaker 3>I was saying, about peptides, and I think because there's

1:06:53.520 --> 1:06:56.720
<v Speaker 3>a lot of cosmetic stuff has peptides, right, yeah, yeah,

1:06:56.760 --> 1:06:58.440
<v Speaker 3>so this is maybe like just injecting what.

1:06:59.400 --> 1:07:04.720
<v Speaker 1>Speaking of, how do we tighten up that face? I

1:07:04.760 --> 1:07:07.440
<v Speaker 1>didn't know you could do these massages or these sculps

1:07:07.480 --> 1:07:09.360
<v Speaker 1>that actually make your face look different. I thought it

1:07:09.440 --> 1:07:11.280
<v Speaker 1>was like, I thought we all had to go the

1:07:11.920 --> 1:07:14.760
<v Speaker 1>what's who's the who's the Kardashian who got the amazing

1:07:15.960 --> 1:07:16.680
<v Speaker 1>plane facial?

1:07:16.840 --> 1:07:19.880
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, that's what Chris Chris Jenner. Okay, that is not

1:07:19.960 --> 1:07:21.480
<v Speaker 12>a big cheat, that's not a little cheap.

1:07:21.520 --> 1:07:22.680
<v Speaker 1>Okay, because that's extensive.

1:07:22.760 --> 1:07:28.080
<v Speaker 12>That's like face off from John Travoltage level. What we're

1:07:28.120 --> 1:07:30.160
<v Speaker 12>talking about is a fashion facial, which is when you

1:07:30.200 --> 1:07:34.040
<v Speaker 12>go in and somebody basically massages the face, your face,

1:07:34.120 --> 1:07:36.960
<v Speaker 12>and the fascia is the is the lining of your muscles,

1:07:37.280 --> 1:07:40.800
<v Speaker 12>and they can kind of rearrange how your face is

1:07:41.280 --> 1:07:43.080
<v Speaker 12>and uh, you know, if you have a big event

1:07:43.280 --> 1:07:44.880
<v Speaker 12>or like your wedding or something, you can go in

1:07:44.920 --> 1:07:46.800
<v Speaker 12>and for a couple of days it'll look snatched.

1:07:47.200 --> 1:07:48.760
<v Speaker 5>Come on, now I'm gonna watch I'm gonna be looking

1:07:48.760 --> 1:07:50.760
<v Speaker 5>over at Tim. He's gonna be like doing these weird things.

1:07:50.680 --> 1:07:53.760
<v Speaker 1>To apparently they also like you can put on gloves

1:07:53.760 --> 1:07:55.440
<v Speaker 1>and massage you're inside your mouth.

1:07:55.680 --> 1:07:58.160
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, that's part of it. Yeah yeah, and that can

1:07:58.200 --> 1:08:00.360
<v Speaker 12>also help with like if you have pain with TMJ

1:08:00.480 --> 1:08:01.080
<v Speaker 12>and stuff like that.

1:08:01.160 --> 1:08:03.600
<v Speaker 3>Okay, all right, well listen, sometimes an old thing is

1:08:03.640 --> 1:08:06.120
<v Speaker 3>actually good. Maybe not, you don't feel that way about

1:08:06.120 --> 1:08:07.800
<v Speaker 3>your body in your face, but when it comes to

1:08:08.800 --> 1:08:11.000
<v Speaker 3>warn barber jackets.

1:08:10.600 --> 1:08:13.560
<v Speaker 12>Oh yeah, so this is it's fall. Fall was late

1:08:13.560 --> 1:08:15.800
<v Speaker 12>to arrive in New York City, but it finally came

1:08:15.840 --> 1:08:18.120
<v Speaker 12>and it's cool, and that means it's barbera coat season,

1:08:18.240 --> 1:08:22.799
<v Speaker 12>which is all the finance bros and gals and and

1:08:23.040 --> 1:08:23.760
<v Speaker 12>my mom.

1:08:25.120 --> 1:08:28.240
<v Speaker 1>Throw on their Chris Guilty at Barbara coats.

1:08:29.000 --> 1:08:32.200
<v Speaker 12>And you know, I always remind my friends every fall

1:08:32.240 --> 1:08:34.200
<v Speaker 12>that you can get your barber coat rewax. So barber

1:08:34.280 --> 1:08:37.360
<v Speaker 12>coat is like a wax cotton mostly waterproof jacket that

1:08:37.400 --> 1:08:39.599
<v Speaker 12>people used to wear for hunting in like the UK,

1:08:39.720 --> 1:08:42.559
<v Speaker 12>Prince Charles is always wearing one, or King Charles rather,

1:08:43.160 --> 1:08:45.920
<v Speaker 12>and uh, so you can get it rewax so that

1:08:46.040 --> 1:08:48.519
<v Speaker 12>it will last longer. And people keep on these coats

1:08:48.600 --> 1:08:51.280
<v Speaker 12>for decades because they you can sort of you can

1:08:51.400 --> 1:08:53.439
<v Speaker 12>keep re upping the waxing and they last, and then

1:08:53.479 --> 1:08:55.479
<v Speaker 12>the longer that you've had it, the better it looks.

1:08:55.479 --> 1:08:58.120
<v Speaker 12>It's like worn in, it's got this great patina. So

1:08:58.160 --> 1:09:00.719
<v Speaker 12>I started looking at other companies that sort of offer

1:09:00.760 --> 1:09:03.760
<v Speaker 12>those services so that your clothes can age and look

1:09:03.800 --> 1:09:04.479
<v Speaker 12>cool and old.

1:09:04.800 --> 1:09:05.000
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

1:09:05.080 --> 1:09:08.599
<v Speaker 1>Well, speaking of that, you talk about how increasingly gen

1:09:08.720 --> 1:09:12.120
<v Speaker 1>Z is looking for stuff that is aged and well worn,

1:09:12.200 --> 1:09:14.559
<v Speaker 1>this idea that it's been loved in the past, and

1:09:14.760 --> 1:09:18.080
<v Speaker 1>Barber is actually getting in on that by buying back

1:09:18.120 --> 1:09:20.360
<v Speaker 1>old coats and fixing them up and reselling them.

1:09:20.479 --> 1:09:20.679
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

1:09:20.720 --> 1:09:23.400
<v Speaker 12>So if your coat has gotten too worn and you

1:09:23.400 --> 1:09:26.160
<v Speaker 12>don't want you don't want it anymore, I really want

1:09:26.160 --> 1:09:28.439
<v Speaker 12>to start over. They'll buy it back for you and

1:09:28.439 --> 1:09:31.880
<v Speaker 12>give you a store credit, and they'll deconstruct the coat

1:09:31.920 --> 1:09:34.360
<v Speaker 12>and they'll reuse it for other coats. And so now

1:09:34.400 --> 1:09:36.519
<v Speaker 12>they sell They have a whole reloved program where they'll

1:09:36.560 --> 1:09:38.800
<v Speaker 12>sell coats that are kind of patched up, mixed in

1:09:38.880 --> 1:09:41.640
<v Speaker 12>match coats. Sometimes they have the tartan pattern on the outside.

1:09:41.720 --> 1:09:44.320
<v Speaker 12>They can look really funky, and they sell them at

1:09:44.320 --> 1:09:46.799
<v Speaker 12>a lower price because they're you know, sort of recycled items,

1:09:46.880 --> 1:09:50.240
<v Speaker 12>upcycled items, and gen Z really likes that and they

1:09:50.240 --> 1:09:52.559
<v Speaker 12>find that they get a lot of younger shoppers coming into.

1:09:52.680 --> 1:09:54.559
<v Speaker 3>But I was surprised that you say the prices start

1:09:54.560 --> 1:09:55.880
<v Speaker 3>at like three twenty five, so they're.

1:09:55.760 --> 1:09:56.800
<v Speaker 12>Not like they're not cheap.

1:09:56.800 --> 1:10:01.200
<v Speaker 3>They're not cheap like even the recycled I have to say, but.

1:10:01.160 --> 1:10:03.240
<v Speaker 12>That's like a Patagonia cos I mean, that's what a jagger.

1:10:03.360 --> 1:10:05.759
<v Speaker 3>No exactly exactly, but I see that in a younger generation.

1:10:05.800 --> 1:10:08.040
<v Speaker 3>I see with my daughter, like she likes to go

1:10:08.280 --> 1:10:11.600
<v Speaker 3>whether it's consignment or like stuff that's been already a

1:10:11.600 --> 1:10:13.360
<v Speaker 3>little bit around the block and a little bit of

1:10:13.360 --> 1:10:13.840
<v Speaker 3>weird and tear in.

1:10:13.920 --> 1:10:15.280
<v Speaker 5>Some things are sometimes really nice.

1:10:15.360 --> 1:10:17.680
<v Speaker 12>Well, you think about resale sites, which are huge, and

1:10:17.720 --> 1:10:19.000
<v Speaker 12>for a long time it was like I got to

1:10:19.000 --> 1:10:21.080
<v Speaker 12>find things that are in mint condition on the real reel,

1:10:21.160 --> 1:10:22.880
<v Speaker 12>Like I want this bag that looks like no one

1:10:22.960 --> 1:10:24.800
<v Speaker 12>uses it and it's changing a bit, and now it's

1:10:24.880 --> 1:10:26.280
<v Speaker 12>now it's like, oh, I want to find something that

1:10:26.320 --> 1:10:28.639
<v Speaker 12>looks like it's been loved and it's been worn, because

1:10:28.640 --> 1:10:30.680
<v Speaker 12>we always want, you know, our geans to look kind

1:10:30.680 --> 1:10:33.120
<v Speaker 12>of beat up. But if you get genes from a

1:10:33.160 --> 1:10:35.639
<v Speaker 12>store that are like pre beat up, it looks really fake.

1:10:35.760 --> 1:10:37.800
<v Speaker 12>It looks like a factory someone went and scratched, like

1:10:37.800 --> 1:10:40.640
<v Speaker 12>the lines in the lap. But if you go to Levi's,

1:10:40.840 --> 1:10:43.679
<v Speaker 12>they buy back jeans and then they resell old jeans

1:10:43.720 --> 1:10:46.080
<v Speaker 12>and like, what's better than a beat up pair of Levi's, Like,

1:10:46.320 --> 1:10:48.920
<v Speaker 12>and you know, gen zs and younger people are really

1:10:48.920 --> 1:10:50.800
<v Speaker 12>into that and really good for the environment as well,

1:10:50.880 --> 1:10:52.960
<v Speaker 12>and that's part of it. They're very into sustainability.

1:10:53.920 --> 1:10:56.679
<v Speaker 3>Didn't you just buy a recycled, not recycled, an old

1:10:56.720 --> 1:10:58.360
<v Speaker 3>watch and you actually said?

1:10:58.400 --> 1:11:01.160
<v Speaker 5>Yes, I love this. As we wrap up here, one.

1:11:01.080 --> 1:11:05.320
<v Speaker 12>Of my favorite watches is this old Gerard Parago triple calendar,

1:11:05.920 --> 1:11:07.400
<v Speaker 12>which is a very old fashioned kind of watch, and

1:11:07.760 --> 1:11:10.000
<v Speaker 12>the like the day and the date are so tiny

1:11:10.000 --> 1:11:12.720
<v Speaker 12>it's hard to read, but it looks great and I

1:11:13.040 --> 1:11:14.840
<v Speaker 12>h and I got it fixed up because it was

1:11:15.040 --> 1:11:16.760
<v Speaker 12>parts of it weren't working, and they were like, okay,

1:11:16.840 --> 1:11:18.360
<v Speaker 12>do you want us to polish it and make it,

1:11:18.400 --> 1:11:20.080
<v Speaker 12>you know, make it new and replace the gold here

1:11:20.080 --> 1:11:22.800
<v Speaker 12>and I was like, no, do not polish it. I

1:11:22.840 --> 1:11:24.920
<v Speaker 12>want it exactly as it was. I just want it

1:11:24.960 --> 1:11:27.040
<v Speaker 12>to work. And that's a thing in watches now, people

1:11:27.080 --> 1:11:28.760
<v Speaker 12>want it. They don't want things polished, they don't want

1:11:28.760 --> 1:11:31.240
<v Speaker 12>things updated. They want it to be exactly as it was.

1:11:31.520 --> 1:11:33.600
<v Speaker 1>Let the record show Chris is wearing not one, but

1:11:33.680 --> 1:11:37.679
<v Speaker 1>two watches right now, the the Analog on his left

1:11:37.680 --> 1:11:39.960
<v Speaker 1>wrist and the Apple Watch Digital on his right.

1:11:40.000 --> 1:11:40.200
<v Speaker 4>Risk.

1:11:40.240 --> 1:11:42.000
<v Speaker 5>It just wants to be balanced. That's what it's all about.

1:11:42.760 --> 1:11:44.800
<v Speaker 3>Love these cheets, Love you, Chris, Thank you so much.

1:11:44.840 --> 1:11:48.400
<v Speaker 3>Really appreciate it, really appreciate it. Bloomberg Pursuits Editor at Large,

1:11:48.479 --> 1:11:49.800
<v Speaker 3>Chris Rouser.

1:11:49.720 --> 1:11:52.000
<v Speaker 1>And that wraps up the weekend edition of Bloomberg Business

1:11:52.000 --> 1:11:54.200
<v Speaker 1>Week from Bloomberg Radio. Thanks so much for joining us.

1:11:54.240 --> 1:11:56.360
<v Speaker 3>You showed a tune into Bloomberg Business Week daily Monday

1:11:56.360 --> 1:11:58.280
<v Speaker 3>through Friday, starting it to be on Wall Street Time,

1:11:58.280 --> 1:12:01.479
<v Speaker 3>on Bloomberg TV, Bloomberg Radio, and on Serious Sixtem Channel

1:12:01.479 --> 1:12:03.840
<v Speaker 3>one twenty one. You can listen to us an Apple

1:12:03.880 --> 1:12:06.840
<v Speaker 3>CarPlay and Android Auto. It is free in the Apple

1:12:06.840 --> 1:12:08.479
<v Speaker 3>app Store or on Google Play.

1:12:08.640 --> 1:12:10.960
<v Speaker 1>You can also watch our daily broadcast on YouTube. Just

1:12:11.000 --> 1:12:15.200
<v Speaker 1>search Bloomberg Podcasts and we're simulcast on Bloomberg Originals available

1:12:15.200 --> 1:12:19.320
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot com, Slash Originals, and streaming platforms like Roku, Amazon,

1:12:19.320 --> 1:12:21.679
<v Speaker 1>fireTV Samsung TV Plus and more.

1:12:21.720 --> 1:12:24.920
<v Speaker 3>Find our Bloomberg Business Weekdaily Podcast at Bloomberg dot com, Apple,

1:12:25.040 --> 1:12:27.640
<v Speaker 3>or wherever you get your podcasts. The latest edition to

1:12:27.720 --> 1:12:30.479
<v Speaker 3>magazine available on newsstands now, at Bloomberg dot com and

1:12:30.680 --> 1:12:33.720
<v Speaker 3>always on the Bloomberg Terminal. I'm Carol Masser and.

1:12:33.680 --> 1:12:36.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm Tim Steneveek. Have a good and safe weekend everyone.

1:12:36.960 --> 1:12:42.320
<v Speaker 2>This is the Bloomberg BusinessWeek Daily Podcast, available on Apple, Spotify,

1:12:42.439 --> 1:12:46.160
<v Speaker 2>and anywhere else you get your podcasts. Listen live weekday

1:12:46.200 --> 1:12:50.120
<v Speaker 2>afternoons from two to five pm Eastern on Bloomberg dot com,

1:12:50.240 --> 1:12:54.160
<v Speaker 2>the iHeartRadio app, tune In, and the Bloomberg Business App.

1:12:54.360 --> 1:12:57.320
<v Speaker 2>You can also watch us live every weekday on YouTube

1:12:57.360 --> 1:12:59.519
<v Speaker 2>and always on the Bloomberg Terminal