WEBVTT - The Good Enough Job with Simone Stolzoff #667

0:00:00.080 --> 0:00:02.960
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Hod of Money. I'm Joel and I am

0:00:03.080 --> 0:00:06.040
<v Speaker 1>Matt and today we're discussing The Good Enough Job with

0:00:06.360 --> 0:00:07.640
<v Speaker 1>Simone stoles Off.

0:00:27.400 --> 0:00:29.600
<v Speaker 2>So I'm going to start today's episode a little differently.

0:00:30.000 --> 0:00:33.640
<v Speaker 2>Let's start out with a quote. Work will always be work.

0:00:34.040 --> 0:00:37.240
<v Speaker 2>Some people work doing what they love. Other people work

0:00:37.280 --> 0:00:39.519
<v Speaker 2>so that they can do what they love when they

0:00:39.520 --> 0:00:44.120
<v Speaker 2>are not working. Neither is more noble. This is a

0:00:44.240 --> 0:00:48.160
<v Speaker 2>quote from Simone stoles Off's new book, The Good Enough Job,

0:00:48.320 --> 0:00:50.160
<v Speaker 2>that is set to publish here in a couple of weeks,

0:00:50.440 --> 0:00:53.920
<v Speaker 2>and it's actually made by Simone's favorite writer who happens

0:00:53.920 --> 0:00:56.920
<v Speaker 2>to be a poet. And after going through this book,

0:00:56.920 --> 0:00:58.920
<v Speaker 2>I don't think anything else we could say could actually

0:00:59.040 --> 0:01:03.080
<v Speaker 2>encapsulate Simo's book any better. But we are going to

0:01:03.160 --> 0:01:05.480
<v Speaker 2>discuss a number of themes from the book, how to

0:01:06.200 --> 0:01:09.240
<v Speaker 2>basically diversify your identity. We're gonna talk about the similarities

0:01:09.280 --> 0:01:13.120
<v Speaker 2>between work and religion, or maybe the dissimilarities, uh, the

0:01:13.200 --> 0:01:15.720
<v Speaker 2>false promise of chasing after status. All of this we're

0:01:15.720 --> 0:01:16.720
<v Speaker 2>going to discuss.

0:01:16.400 --> 0:01:17.240
<v Speaker 3>Today and more.

0:01:17.440 --> 0:01:19.760
<v Speaker 2>Simone stoles Off, thank you so much for joining us

0:01:19.760 --> 0:01:20.479
<v Speaker 2>on the podcast.

0:01:20.760 --> 0:01:21.720
<v Speaker 4>It's a pleasure to be here.

0:01:21.760 --> 0:01:24.520
<v Speaker 1>Guys, we're glad to have you and some of your

0:01:24.520 --> 0:01:27.440
<v Speaker 1>closest friends call you Simo, So we assume just based

0:01:27.440 --> 0:01:29.800
<v Speaker 1>on our five minute chat beforehand, we can we're allowed

0:01:29.800 --> 0:01:30.080
<v Speaker 1>to call you.

0:01:30.120 --> 0:01:31.160
<v Speaker 2>That is that we switching to Semo.

0:01:31.520 --> 0:01:34.000
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, Oh, it's kind of like my cocktail party line.

0:01:34.000 --> 0:01:36.600
<v Speaker 4>You know, it's like Simo. It's like Nemo with an S.

0:01:36.800 --> 0:01:40.000
<v Speaker 1>You know, awesome. So we'll probably refer to you that

0:01:40.040 --> 0:01:42.120
<v Speaker 1>way through a lot of this episode. But Simo, we're

0:01:42.120 --> 0:01:43.720
<v Speaker 1>excited to chat with you. And the first question we

0:01:43.760 --> 0:01:46.000
<v Speaker 1>ask every guest who comes on the show is what

0:01:46.080 --> 0:01:48.200
<v Speaker 1>is their craft beer equivalent? And what we mean by

0:01:48.200 --> 0:01:51.000
<v Speaker 1>that is, while you're saving and investing diligently for the future,

0:01:51.360 --> 0:01:54.240
<v Speaker 1>what is it that you proactively spend money on that

0:01:54.320 --> 0:01:56.840
<v Speaker 1>some people might think is a little weird or you're

0:01:56.880 --> 0:01:59.400
<v Speaker 1>just thrilled to spend money in a certain way while

0:01:59.400 --> 0:02:00.440
<v Speaker 1>you're still handling money.

0:02:00.600 --> 0:02:05.520
<v Speaker 4>Well, yeah, so my craft beer equivalent isn't the most

0:02:05.520 --> 0:02:09.320
<v Speaker 4>expensive purchase. It might pile up if you do it

0:02:09.360 --> 0:02:12.120
<v Speaker 4>as frequently as I do. But I am a chocolate

0:02:12.160 --> 0:02:15.440
<v Speaker 4>chip cookie fiend. I actually hate a chocolate chip cookie

0:02:15.560 --> 0:02:20.640
<v Speaker 4>every single day for four years of college. It's like

0:02:21.120 --> 0:02:24.120
<v Speaker 4>become a little bit of like it's like my brand now,

0:02:24.200 --> 0:02:26.080
<v Speaker 4>you know, like my friends like me. It's like the

0:02:26.120 --> 0:02:28.640
<v Speaker 4>cookie guy. But I still love them, you know, And

0:02:28.680 --> 0:02:31.440
<v Speaker 4>I like I'm not much of like a chocolate chip

0:02:31.480 --> 0:02:34.200
<v Speaker 4>cookie snob, you know, I'm a kind of equal opportunist,

0:02:34.280 --> 0:02:37.720
<v Speaker 4>from the famous amos to the artisanal like eight dollar

0:02:37.800 --> 0:02:39.280
<v Speaker 4>cookie that I bought the other day.

0:02:39.760 --> 0:02:40.919
<v Speaker 3>Are you baking your own ever?

0:02:41.560 --> 0:02:44.000
<v Speaker 4>Sometimes? Yeah, I don't know. I feel like cookies are

0:02:44.080 --> 0:02:47.800
<v Speaker 4>kind of like Beatles songs, like even the not great

0:02:47.840 --> 0:02:49.040
<v Speaker 4>ones are still like pretty good.

0:02:51.360 --> 0:02:54.440
<v Speaker 2>Feel that way if you're mentioning famous amos in the

0:02:54.520 --> 0:02:57.760
<v Speaker 2>same as like an all, let me come on, who

0:02:57.760 --> 0:02:59.960
<v Speaker 2>can who's actually putting those things down? But I guess

0:03:00.200 --> 0:03:01.520
<v Speaker 2>you do not discriminate one.

0:03:01.600 --> 0:03:04.000
<v Speaker 1>Do you ever go off brand like the fake chips

0:03:04.000 --> 0:03:05.040
<v Speaker 1>a hole or something like that?

0:03:05.400 --> 0:03:06.160
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I'll do it.

0:03:06.320 --> 0:03:06.680
<v Speaker 3>I don't know.

0:03:06.760 --> 0:03:11.360
<v Speaker 4>I'm just like easily pleased. It's maybe not best for

0:03:11.520 --> 0:03:16.360
<v Speaker 4>like my cultural high brownness, but I like enjoy cookies

0:03:16.400 --> 0:03:17.280
<v Speaker 4>in all of their forms.

0:03:17.400 --> 0:03:18.440
<v Speaker 3>No, I love it. Okay.

0:03:18.440 --> 0:03:20.440
<v Speaker 2>One last question about the cookies. Do you have a

0:03:20.560 --> 0:03:23.960
<v Speaker 2>favorite for lack of better words, adjunct, like, what's something

0:03:24.000 --> 0:03:26.320
<v Speaker 2>that you like in chocolate chip cookies that may not

0:03:26.360 --> 0:03:27.360
<v Speaker 2>necessarily be traditional.

0:03:27.400 --> 0:03:29.160
<v Speaker 3>And if you say raisins this interviews over.

0:03:29.080 --> 0:03:33.440
<v Speaker 4>Now, yeah, I'm a purist. I think I my like

0:03:33.600 --> 0:03:37.160
<v Speaker 4>hotter take literally is that I like under baked cookies.

0:03:37.240 --> 0:03:39.280
<v Speaker 4>I like cookies that still feel like a little gooey

0:03:39.280 --> 0:03:41.760
<v Speaker 4>in the middle, and like the closer that you can

0:03:41.800 --> 0:03:46.600
<v Speaker 4>get to the cookie dough spectrum without giving yourself sammonilla.

0:03:47.280 --> 0:03:48.200
<v Speaker 3>No, I like that respect.

0:03:48.280 --> 0:03:50.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, the ability to fold a cookie in half is

0:03:50.560 --> 0:03:51.520
<v Speaker 2>better than.

0:03:52.280 --> 0:03:54.560
<v Speaker 4>You're getting to like my Italian roots.

0:03:54.240 --> 0:03:57.000
<v Speaker 3>Way, yes, yeah, yeah.

0:03:56.480 --> 0:03:58.920
<v Speaker 2>I love it all right. That's somebody loves to have

0:03:59.000 --> 0:04:01.480
<v Speaker 2>into your book on it like you. So you say

0:04:01.480 --> 0:04:05.000
<v Speaker 2>that you're recovering workest in the intro it kind of

0:04:05.080 --> 0:04:09.400
<v Speaker 2>it almost feels like an AA introduction introduction, honestly, But

0:04:09.520 --> 0:04:12.200
<v Speaker 2>talk to us about maybe when it dawned on you

0:04:12.320 --> 0:04:15.360
<v Speaker 2>that you were overvaluing the role of work in your

0:04:15.360 --> 0:04:16.200
<v Speaker 2>own life, Like, what.

0:04:16.160 --> 0:04:18.080
<v Speaker 3>Is it that caused you to reevaluate that?

0:04:18.960 --> 0:04:21.320
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, So, you know, I think we're all about the

0:04:21.320 --> 0:04:24.240
<v Speaker 4>same age, kind of smack in the middle of the

0:04:24.279 --> 0:04:28.120
<v Speaker 4>millennial generation. And I think I was raised on certain scripts.

0:04:28.160 --> 0:04:31.479
<v Speaker 4>You know, I grew up with lots of opportunity, which

0:04:31.520 --> 0:04:34.560
<v Speaker 4>I'm grateful for, and also this mentality of you know,

0:04:34.600 --> 0:04:37.080
<v Speaker 4>I could sort of do whatever I wanted, and it

0:04:37.120 --> 0:04:40.080
<v Speaker 4>was just a matter of figuring out what particular career

0:04:40.120 --> 0:04:43.719
<v Speaker 4>path or what particular job was the best reflection of

0:04:43.760 --> 0:04:48.359
<v Speaker 4>my unique passion and personality. And I spent my twenties

0:04:48.480 --> 0:04:52.600
<v Speaker 4>really playing goldilocks with different jobs. I worked in tech

0:04:52.680 --> 0:04:54.840
<v Speaker 4>for a few years, and I worked in food for

0:04:54.880 --> 0:04:57.839
<v Speaker 4>a few years, and I worked in journalism for a

0:04:57.839 --> 0:05:01.400
<v Speaker 4>few years. And it really came to ahead at a

0:05:01.480 --> 0:05:06.680
<v Speaker 4>moment when I was choosing between these two particular jobs.

0:05:07.120 --> 0:05:09.640
<v Speaker 4>One was to be a staff writer at a digital

0:05:09.640 --> 0:05:12.640
<v Speaker 4>magazine and the other was to be a designer at

0:05:12.680 --> 0:05:16.560
<v Speaker 4>this global design agency. And on one hand, it's like, oh,

0:05:16.720 --> 0:05:19.520
<v Speaker 4>agony is me, you know, like the plight of deciding

0:05:19.600 --> 0:05:23.320
<v Speaker 4>between two attractive job authors. But you know, maybe you

0:05:23.360 --> 0:05:25.000
<v Speaker 4>guys or some of your listeners have been in a

0:05:25.040 --> 0:05:27.560
<v Speaker 4>similar crossroads before, you know, For me, I really didn't

0:05:27.600 --> 0:05:31.240
<v Speaker 4>feel like I was choosing between two jobs as much

0:05:31.279 --> 0:05:35.520
<v Speaker 4>as I was choosing between two versions of me. And

0:05:35.680 --> 0:05:38.920
<v Speaker 4>this sort of like career and decision moment I was

0:05:38.960 --> 0:05:42.360
<v Speaker 4>probably twenty eight or twenty nine really threw me for

0:05:42.480 --> 0:05:45.400
<v Speaker 4>an existential loop, and I was wondering, sort of, how

0:05:45.440 --> 0:05:49.760
<v Speaker 4>did my identity become so entwined with what I did

0:05:50.000 --> 0:05:53.320
<v Speaker 4>for work, what I did to make money? And that

0:05:53.440 --> 0:05:56.360
<v Speaker 4>was sort of the first kernel that led to what

0:05:56.520 --> 0:05:59.080
<v Speaker 4>became the research project that eventually became the book.

0:05:59.400 --> 0:06:02.760
<v Speaker 1>Nice Well, and yeah, I think probably, Well, I don't know.

0:06:02.800 --> 0:06:04.560
<v Speaker 1>Maybe some people have not had that, and they're just

0:06:04.640 --> 0:06:06.839
<v Speaker 1>nose to the grindstone and they haven't had that moment

0:06:06.920 --> 0:06:10.320
<v Speaker 1>of reflection. Hopefully this discussion like that we're going to

0:06:10.360 --> 0:06:12.920
<v Speaker 1>have today pushes people to have a little bit of

0:06:13.000 --> 0:06:16.160
<v Speaker 1>that at least start to initiate the thought process. Am

0:06:16.160 --> 0:06:19.600
<v Speaker 1>I putting too much effort or identity into my work?

0:06:19.720 --> 0:06:22.359
<v Speaker 1>But can you give us a brief history lesson about

0:06:22.360 --> 0:06:24.719
<v Speaker 1>how we got to the point where careers became so

0:06:24.880 --> 0:06:28.359
<v Speaker 1>central to our identity, to our existence. It seems like

0:06:28.440 --> 0:06:31.159
<v Speaker 1>it didn't used to be that way, and now careers

0:06:31.160 --> 0:06:32.880
<v Speaker 1>are kind of all defining in a lot of ways.

0:06:33.760 --> 0:06:37.880
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I mean, there's many different possible ways to answer

0:06:37.920 --> 0:06:41.799
<v Speaker 4>this question. And maybe if your last name is Miller,

0:06:42.320 --> 0:06:45.599
<v Speaker 4>you probably condect to differ that. You know, identity and

0:06:45.680 --> 0:06:47.960
<v Speaker 4>careers have been tied together for a long time. But

0:06:48.040 --> 0:06:51.520
<v Speaker 4>I think there is something that is uniquely American about this,

0:06:51.640 --> 0:06:54.760
<v Speaker 4>and also something that is unique to the last sort

0:06:54.760 --> 0:06:56.600
<v Speaker 4>of fifty years or so, and so I think there

0:06:56.600 --> 0:06:59.520
<v Speaker 4>are kind of economic arguments. There's political arguments, there are

0:06:59.800 --> 0:07:04.520
<v Speaker 4>social arguments, cultural arguments. The historical one is just the

0:07:04.560 --> 0:07:08.080
<v Speaker 4>fact that the Protestant work ethic and capitalism we're really

0:07:08.080 --> 0:07:12.200
<v Speaker 4>the two strands that entwine to form our country's DNA.

0:07:12.480 --> 0:07:17.760
<v Speaker 4>From the beginning, being American was synonymous with your ability

0:07:17.880 --> 0:07:21.400
<v Speaker 4>to be a productive member of society or to be

0:07:21.440 --> 0:07:25.680
<v Speaker 4>able to work hard. There's also kind of economic arguments.

0:07:25.920 --> 0:07:28.720
<v Speaker 4>I think this really differs depending on what side of

0:07:28.760 --> 0:07:32.000
<v Speaker 4>the income spectrum you're looking at. On the sort of

0:07:32.280 --> 0:07:35.720
<v Speaker 4>lower earning side, wages have been stagnant for the last

0:07:35.880 --> 0:07:38.520
<v Speaker 4>forty or fifty years, which means that people have had

0:07:38.600 --> 0:07:42.720
<v Speaker 4>to work more just to earn the same money to

0:07:42.760 --> 0:07:45.480
<v Speaker 4>buy the same loaf of bread. Has driven a lot

0:07:45.520 --> 0:07:47.960
<v Speaker 4>of people to work long hours. On the other side,

0:07:48.040 --> 0:07:52.880
<v Speaker 4>there's the tax structure of our country and the way

0:07:52.920 --> 0:07:57.000
<v Speaker 4>that employment and healthcare are often tied together that make

0:07:57.440 --> 0:08:00.760
<v Speaker 4>the consequences of losing work so dire, and also the

0:08:00.800 --> 0:08:03.960
<v Speaker 4>ability to consolidate wealth with the more hours that you work,

0:08:05.400 --> 0:08:09.480
<v Speaker 4>greater abilities to do so. The argument I really focus

0:08:09.560 --> 0:08:13.000
<v Speaker 4>on in the book is the sort of subjective or

0:08:13.080 --> 0:08:18.000
<v Speaker 4>the cultural value that Americans place on their jobs. You know,

0:08:18.040 --> 0:08:21.600
<v Speaker 4>we live in a country that treats CEOs like celebrities,

0:08:21.720 --> 0:08:24.920
<v Speaker 4>and we plaster always do what you love on the

0:08:24.960 --> 0:08:28.360
<v Speaker 4>walls of our co working in space. We parade around

0:08:28.400 --> 0:08:31.640
<v Speaker 4>our job titles and small talk conversation and on our

0:08:31.640 --> 0:08:35.520
<v Speaker 4>social media profiles. And there is really this sense that

0:08:35.640 --> 0:08:39.000
<v Speaker 4>you are what you do. And I think that is

0:08:39.640 --> 0:08:44.120
<v Speaker 4>unique to a certain extent to this age that we're

0:08:44.120 --> 0:08:48.200
<v Speaker 4>in right now. We're work is very much in vogue,

0:08:48.280 --> 0:08:50.640
<v Speaker 4>or maybe in the last three or so years, with

0:08:50.679 --> 0:08:53.720
<v Speaker 4>the pandemic hotly contested about its role in our lives.

0:08:54.360 --> 0:08:56.480
<v Speaker 2>Sure, yeah, and you say it's becoming something that is

0:08:57.120 --> 0:08:59.440
<v Speaker 2>turning out to be more global, Like it's essentially become

0:08:59.480 --> 0:09:02.560
<v Speaker 2>an American export that other countries are now starting to

0:09:02.600 --> 0:09:05.320
<v Speaker 2>follow in our footsteps, sort of like Levi's it's like,

0:09:05.360 --> 0:09:06.800
<v Speaker 2>not only do you get the genes, but you also

0:09:06.840 --> 0:09:09.040
<v Speaker 2>get our ridiculous work ethic.

0:09:09.400 --> 0:09:11.280
<v Speaker 4>But yeah, I mean, I think the way that I

0:09:11.320 --> 0:09:14.439
<v Speaker 4>frame it is like I think workism, which is a

0:09:14.520 --> 0:09:17.600
<v Speaker 4>term that was originally coined by the journalist Derek Thompson

0:09:17.640 --> 0:09:20.280
<v Speaker 4>in the Atlantic. It's the idea of like treating work

0:09:20.320 --> 0:09:23.040
<v Speaker 4>akin to a religious identity. Yeah, the one thing that

0:09:23.080 --> 0:09:24.960
<v Speaker 4>you look to is just a paycheck, but also for

0:09:25.160 --> 0:09:27.560
<v Speaker 4>totally a community, a sense of self worth, a sense

0:09:27.600 --> 0:09:30.920
<v Speaker 4>of purpose in your life. I think it's primarily a

0:09:30.960 --> 0:09:36.480
<v Speaker 4>phenomenon that is most prevalent among people that have a

0:09:36.520 --> 0:09:40.240
<v Speaker 4>certain level of privilege, you know, college educated Americans, But

0:09:40.280 --> 0:09:43.080
<v Speaker 4>that doesn't mean that it exists. It doesn't exist in

0:09:43.120 --> 0:09:46.560
<v Speaker 4>other countries, it doesn't exist in other sort of class strata.

0:09:46.880 --> 0:09:51.320
<v Speaker 4>It just is particularly pronounced for people that have, truthfully

0:09:51.320 --> 0:09:53.160
<v Speaker 4>the privilege to be able to choose what they want.

0:09:53.000 --> 0:09:54.000
<v Speaker 3>To do totally.

0:09:54.120 --> 0:09:56.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, absolutely, And you kind of just touched on something

0:09:56.080 --> 0:09:58.880
<v Speaker 2>I was going to follow up there with, which was religion,

0:09:59.240 --> 0:10:00.960
<v Speaker 2>because you see that. But one of the problems is

0:10:01.000 --> 0:10:03.679
<v Speaker 2>that more folks are trying to get the meaning out

0:10:03.679 --> 0:10:05.960
<v Speaker 2>of their job that they used to find in religion.

0:10:06.360 --> 0:10:09.160
<v Speaker 2>And so is a solution Should we just go to synagogue?

0:10:09.160 --> 0:10:11.200
<v Speaker 2>Should we just go to church? More? Does that solve

0:10:11.200 --> 0:10:14.000
<v Speaker 2>all of our problems? What is the I guess the

0:10:14.000 --> 0:10:17.240
<v Speaker 2>problem or the difficulty in finding or putting our faith

0:10:17.440 --> 0:10:19.120
<v Speaker 2>within our jobs, within our careers.

0:10:19.360 --> 0:10:23.199
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I mean, the data on the religiosity of Americans

0:10:23.320 --> 0:10:26.560
<v Speaker 4>is pretty interesting. You know, if you look back to

0:10:27.120 --> 0:10:31.240
<v Speaker 4>the height of religiosity in the US and sort of

0:10:31.520 --> 0:10:35.960
<v Speaker 4>the nineteen fifties, it's something like six or seven percent

0:10:36.040 --> 0:10:38.760
<v Speaker 4>of Americans weren't religious, and everyone else had a pretty

0:10:38.760 --> 0:10:43.080
<v Speaker 4>strong association with an organized religion. And there's been this

0:10:43.120 --> 0:10:47.920
<v Speaker 4>precipitous decline in the past forty years where today nearly

0:10:48.720 --> 0:10:53.800
<v Speaker 4>one in three almost in the latest data, Americans don't

0:10:54.280 --> 0:10:58.120
<v Speaker 4>have a particular religious affiliation, whether they're agnostic or atheist,

0:10:58.200 --> 0:11:01.360
<v Speaker 4>or just don't believe in anything in particular. And so,

0:11:01.559 --> 0:11:03.600
<v Speaker 4>you know, when you think about the role that religion

0:11:03.640 --> 0:11:07.559
<v Speaker 4>plays in people's lives, it is obviously something to believe in,

0:11:08.000 --> 0:11:12.520
<v Speaker 4>a potential path to transcendence, but it's also a primary community.

0:11:12.559 --> 0:11:15.400
<v Speaker 4>It's a primary source of your identity. And so with

0:11:15.600 --> 0:11:20.000
<v Speaker 4>the decline of these organized religions, the need for belonging

0:11:20.160 --> 0:11:23.440
<v Speaker 4>and for purpose still remains. And the argument that they

0:11:23.480 --> 0:11:26.080
<v Speaker 4>make in the book is that work, for many people

0:11:26.160 --> 0:11:29.600
<v Speaker 4>has taken on that role. But the problem is that

0:11:29.600 --> 0:11:33.839
<v Speaker 4>that's not necessarily a burden. Our jobs are designed to bear.

0:11:34.040 --> 0:11:37.200
<v Speaker 4>You know, this is particularly visible in the past few

0:11:37.280 --> 0:11:40.839
<v Speaker 4>years with the pandemic. You know, some people, whether it

0:11:41.000 --> 0:11:45.040
<v Speaker 4>was due to layoffs or furloughs, lost their jobs, you know,

0:11:45.080 --> 0:11:48.240
<v Speaker 4>and if your work is your primary source of identity

0:11:48.280 --> 0:11:51.319
<v Speaker 4>and meaning and you lose it, what's left well.

0:11:51.320 --> 0:11:53.880
<v Speaker 1>And even for folks who didn't lose their job, maybe

0:11:53.960 --> 0:11:56.760
<v Speaker 1>they started working from home in that connection to the

0:11:56.800 --> 0:12:00.360
<v Speaker 1>culture and to the community of work was sever and

0:12:00.440 --> 0:12:03.920
<v Speaker 1>so that kind of changed their relationship how they interacted

0:12:03.960 --> 0:12:06.760
<v Speaker 1>with their work as well. So it was seen more

0:12:06.800 --> 0:12:09.520
<v Speaker 1>as like a I do this for a paycheck when

0:12:09.559 --> 0:12:12.440
<v Speaker 1>I can, and it lost some of its all encompassing nature.

0:12:12.480 --> 0:12:13.480
<v Speaker 1>You think that's true too.

0:12:13.920 --> 0:12:16.640
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, definitely. I mean I think regardless of what type

0:12:16.679 --> 0:12:19.280
<v Speaker 4>of work, you had changed in some way in the

0:12:19.320 --> 0:12:21.560
<v Speaker 4>past three years. And you know, I started reporting this

0:12:21.600 --> 0:12:24.719
<v Speaker 4>book before the pandemic. I definitely did not anticipate a

0:12:24.760 --> 0:12:28.800
<v Speaker 4>global pandemic helping everyone sort of reconsider their relationship to

0:12:28.840 --> 0:12:32.040
<v Speaker 4>their jobs. But it was this huge wake up call

0:12:32.559 --> 0:12:35.880
<v Speaker 4>I think for everyone. You know, their job wasn't exactly

0:12:35.920 --> 0:12:37.920
<v Speaker 4>what it used to be. And I think people who

0:12:38.120 --> 0:12:41.400
<v Speaker 4>were maybe over indexed and looking to work as a

0:12:41.440 --> 0:12:44.760
<v Speaker 4>source of identity and meaning in their life were left

0:12:44.800 --> 0:12:47.240
<v Speaker 4>for a rude awakening, you know. And the main sort

0:12:47.240 --> 0:12:48.960
<v Speaker 4>of argument that I make in the book, when it

0:12:49.000 --> 0:12:51.400
<v Speaker 4>gets into a little bit more of an editorial section,

0:12:51.920 --> 0:12:54.439
<v Speaker 4>is about what you said about the value of diversifying

0:12:54.760 --> 0:12:58.120
<v Speaker 4>your identity and sources of meaning beyond just what you

0:12:58.200 --> 0:13:01.240
<v Speaker 4>do for work. You know, this isn't just to protect

0:13:01.360 --> 0:13:03.079
<v Speaker 4>in the case that you get laid off, But I

0:13:03.080 --> 0:13:06.440
<v Speaker 4>think one of the risks of a work centric existence

0:13:06.960 --> 0:13:09.800
<v Speaker 4>is that we can neglect other parts of who we are.

0:13:10.480 --> 0:13:11.959
<v Speaker 1>And one other thing I want to follow by I

0:13:12.000 --> 0:13:14.120
<v Speaker 1>mentioned how there is a work from home class. I

0:13:14.120 --> 0:13:18.240
<v Speaker 1>feel like the pandemic kind of it created dichotomy, right,

0:13:18.280 --> 0:13:22.600
<v Speaker 1>and we saw other people incredibly overworked and theirship their

0:13:22.800 --> 0:13:24.280
<v Speaker 1>job changed in a different way if you worked at

0:13:24.320 --> 0:13:26.400
<v Speaker 1>a grocery store. My dad, who was stocking shelves in

0:13:26.440 --> 0:13:29.400
<v Speaker 1>a grocery store at the ripe old age of sixty eight,

0:13:29.679 --> 0:13:32.080
<v Speaker 1>like that was a different thing, right than what a

0:13:32.080 --> 0:13:34.240
<v Speaker 1>lot of other people experienced. A laptop class to work

0:13:34.240 --> 0:13:36.319
<v Speaker 1>from any work class. And so it really was kind

0:13:36.320 --> 0:13:38.679
<v Speaker 1>of a tale of two Americans and how they relate

0:13:38.720 --> 0:13:41.120
<v Speaker 1>to work. And everyone was questioning their relationship to work,

0:13:41.160 --> 0:13:42.040
<v Speaker 1>but for different reasons.

0:13:42.040 --> 0:13:45.160
<v Speaker 4>I think, yeah, I mean, I love harping on that

0:13:45.280 --> 0:13:48.440
<v Speaker 4>term essential worker that was thrown around so often during

0:13:48.520 --> 0:13:51.120
<v Speaker 4>the pandemic. It's like we saw that many of these

0:13:51.160 --> 0:13:54.200
<v Speaker 4>workers were essential. My partner is an elementary school teacher,

0:13:54.280 --> 0:13:57.079
<v Speaker 4>you know, and maybe similar to your father. Her workload

0:13:57.280 --> 0:14:00.080
<v Speaker 4>and the risk that she had to expose herself to

0:14:00.440 --> 0:14:04.439
<v Speaker 4>increased astronomically over the course of the pandemic. And yet

0:14:04.440 --> 0:14:08.760
<v Speaker 4>we still haven't necessarily given these workers that we deem

0:14:08.960 --> 0:14:12.880
<v Speaker 4>essential the protections and the pay and the benefit to

0:14:13.040 --> 0:14:15.640
<v Speaker 4>ensure that they can keep doing their jobs safely for

0:14:15.840 --> 0:14:16.200
<v Speaker 4>us all.

0:14:16.520 --> 0:14:19.760
<v Speaker 2>So you mentioned diversifying your identity. Can you share some

0:14:19.800 --> 0:14:22.920
<v Speaker 2>of the benefits of diversifying your identity? Right, So, when

0:14:22.920 --> 0:14:24.480
<v Speaker 2>it comes to investing your money, you want to make

0:14:24.480 --> 0:14:26.000
<v Speaker 2>sure that you don't have all of your eggs in

0:14:26.040 --> 0:14:28.080
<v Speaker 2>one basket. And essentially, what you're saying here is that

0:14:28.120 --> 0:14:31.200
<v Speaker 2>we are putting all of our eggs into this basket

0:14:31.240 --> 0:14:34.560
<v Speaker 2>of career or job title or whatever it is that

0:14:34.600 --> 0:14:37.240
<v Speaker 2>we find most attractive about our jobs. What are some

0:14:37.280 --> 0:14:39.800
<v Speaker 2>of the benefits that you found when we take a

0:14:39.840 --> 0:14:42.520
<v Speaker 2>step back and when we look to some other outlets

0:14:42.520 --> 0:14:45.640
<v Speaker 2>some other ways that we are able to find our

0:14:45.800 --> 0:14:47.280
<v Speaker 2>identity totally.

0:14:47.440 --> 0:14:50.760
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, you know, much as an investor benefits from diversifying

0:14:50.800 --> 0:14:53.920
<v Speaker 4>the stocks in their portfolio, I think we two really

0:14:53.920 --> 0:14:58.040
<v Speaker 4>benefit from diversifying the sources of identity and meaning in

0:14:58.080 --> 0:15:00.560
<v Speaker 4>our lives. And there's some research to back up. You know,

0:15:00.600 --> 0:15:06.560
<v Speaker 4>there's studies about what researchers call developing greater self complexity,

0:15:06.880 --> 0:15:11.200
<v Speaker 4>or having different self aspects, which essentially means just investing

0:15:11.200 --> 0:15:14.080
<v Speaker 4>in different parts of ourselves. You know, we're not just workers.

0:15:14.120 --> 0:15:18.920
<v Speaker 4>We're also siblings and neighbors and citizens and friends and parents,

0:15:19.160 --> 0:15:22.680
<v Speaker 4>and you know, these identities they need investment, you know.

0:15:22.800 --> 0:15:27.440
<v Speaker 4>They One of the main reasons or arguments for doing

0:15:27.480 --> 0:15:30.560
<v Speaker 4>so is that in the case of it doesn't even

0:15:30.640 --> 0:15:33.200
<v Speaker 4>have to be a layoff, but any sort of bad

0:15:33.320 --> 0:15:36.480
<v Speaker 4>news in the work realm, when we have a more

0:15:36.560 --> 0:15:41.240
<v Speaker 4>diversified identity portfolio, it's less likely to spill over into

0:15:41.280 --> 0:15:43.920
<v Speaker 4>other aspects of our lives. We're more resilient if we

0:15:44.000 --> 0:15:49.480
<v Speaker 4>have greater self complexity. There's also a semblance not just

0:15:49.520 --> 0:15:52.720
<v Speaker 4>in the sort of the bare case of something tragic

0:15:52.800 --> 0:15:56.240
<v Speaker 4>or bad happening, but in just the value of being

0:15:56.280 --> 0:16:00.760
<v Speaker 4>able to give our time and attention into other parts

0:16:00.760 --> 0:16:04.400
<v Speaker 4>of who we are. It's important to keep in mind

0:16:04.680 --> 0:16:07.680
<v Speaker 4>that identities are sort of like plants, you know, like

0:16:07.720 --> 0:16:12.080
<v Speaker 4>they need time and intention in order to grow. And

0:16:12.120 --> 0:16:15.520
<v Speaker 4>I think part of the risk of living in a

0:16:15.600 --> 0:16:18.800
<v Speaker 4>life that's so centered around work is that work doesn't

0:16:18.840 --> 0:16:22.800
<v Speaker 4>just take our best time and often also takes our

0:16:22.840 --> 0:16:26.240
<v Speaker 4>best energy as well. And so one of the arguments

0:16:26.240 --> 0:16:27.960
<v Speaker 4>that Ike in the book is that in order to

0:16:29.280 --> 0:16:33.080
<v Speaker 4>diversify your identity beyond what you do for work, you

0:16:33.200 --> 0:16:37.200
<v Speaker 4>have to do things other than work, which may seem

0:16:37.240 --> 0:16:40.320
<v Speaker 4>a little obvious, but you know, for me at least,

0:16:40.360 --> 0:16:42.480
<v Speaker 4>I can definitely relate to the experience of you know,

0:16:42.520 --> 0:16:45.040
<v Speaker 4>you go to work, you come home, you're exhausted. All

0:16:45.120 --> 0:16:47.240
<v Speaker 4>you have the energy to do is sort of turn

0:16:47.280 --> 0:16:51.240
<v Speaker 4>off your brain and turn on Netflix. And while that can,

0:16:51.440 --> 0:16:54.440
<v Speaker 4>you know, temporarily be a nice way to recharge or

0:16:54.560 --> 0:16:56.800
<v Speaker 4>you know, to get lost in another world, if you

0:16:56.840 --> 0:16:59.480
<v Speaker 4>really want to have other sources of meaning in your life,

0:16:59.680 --> 0:17:04.000
<v Speaker 4>you need to be actively doing things and in the community,

0:17:04.119 --> 0:17:08.080
<v Speaker 4>doing things with others, investing in your relationships. And so

0:17:08.280 --> 0:17:09.560
<v Speaker 4>that's what I advocate for.

0:17:10.320 --> 0:17:13.280
<v Speaker 2>Yes, it's about just being a well rounded individual. And

0:17:13.800 --> 0:17:16.439
<v Speaker 2>as you were talking about religion a second ago, it

0:17:16.520 --> 0:17:19.800
<v Speaker 2>maybe think through how getting laid off from a job

0:17:19.880 --> 0:17:22.320
<v Speaker 2>that's not a I mean, it's not something that anybody

0:17:22.320 --> 0:17:24.480
<v Speaker 2>wants to go through, but it's not like it's the

0:17:24.520 --> 0:17:28.040
<v Speaker 2>equivalent of having your faith taken from you. And so

0:17:28.240 --> 0:17:31.680
<v Speaker 2>I see that as being another problem with viewing your job.

0:17:31.840 --> 0:17:34.520
<v Speaker 2>And you know, almost to the same extent that you

0:17:34.600 --> 0:17:37.480
<v Speaker 2>view religion is that faith is it's such a personal

0:17:37.680 --> 0:17:41.600
<v Speaker 2>and internal thing, and the ability for somebody outside of

0:17:41.640 --> 0:17:44.600
<v Speaker 2>you to take that away kind of goes counter to

0:17:44.720 --> 0:17:47.359
<v Speaker 2>I think how a lot of individuals view their faith,

0:17:47.400 --> 0:17:50.399
<v Speaker 2>how they view their spirituality. And so yeah, for you

0:17:50.400 --> 0:17:51.560
<v Speaker 2>to show up one day and all of a sudden,

0:17:51.560 --> 0:17:53.199
<v Speaker 2>it's just like, hey, this thing that you've depended on

0:17:53.240 --> 0:17:55.879
<v Speaker 2>as much as someone would typically depend on their faith,

0:17:55.920 --> 0:17:59.600
<v Speaker 2>as oh, it's no longer there. That could be incredibly

0:17:59.720 --> 0:18:02.080
<v Speaker 2>dev stadium even more tenuous connection to our work than

0:18:02.080 --> 0:18:04.280
<v Speaker 2>we think. And some people who if you put your

0:18:04.320 --> 0:18:08.080
<v Speaker 2>hope and dreams and faith and future expectations all inside

0:18:08.119 --> 0:18:10.560
<v Speaker 2>of this one vehicle which is your career, at some

0:18:10.640 --> 0:18:13.199
<v Speaker 2>point problematic there's a really good chance that someone can

0:18:13.240 --> 0:18:15.199
<v Speaker 2>take that away from you, it's like a janguitower and

0:18:15.240 --> 0:18:17.920
<v Speaker 2>it's like you're down to just like a singular block

0:18:18.000 --> 0:18:20.800
<v Speaker 2>at the bottom. If you were to pull that one thing,

0:18:20.840 --> 0:18:22.639
<v Speaker 2>it's like everything else just completely falls up. Year.

0:18:23.119 --> 0:18:26.760
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I mean, you guys know the writer David Foster Wallace,

0:18:26.760 --> 0:18:29.320
<v Speaker 4>he has this very iconic speech, this is Water, and

0:18:29.359 --> 0:18:31.440
<v Speaker 4>one of the points that he makes is that there's

0:18:31.480 --> 0:18:36.359
<v Speaker 4>no such thing as not worshiping. We all worship something,

0:18:36.440 --> 0:18:41.280
<v Speaker 4>either consciously or unconsciously, and whatever you end up worshiping

0:18:41.359 --> 0:18:45.160
<v Speaker 4>will probably eat you alive. You know, worship beauty and

0:18:45.240 --> 0:18:49.000
<v Speaker 4>you'll feel like you're never beautiful enough. Or worship money

0:18:49.040 --> 0:18:52.280
<v Speaker 4>and you feel like you never have enough of it.

0:18:52.320 --> 0:18:56.000
<v Speaker 4>And I think the same is true with work. You know,

0:18:56.280 --> 0:19:00.679
<v Speaker 4>it's what gets us into these systems where are you know,

0:19:00.760 --> 0:19:05.119
<v Speaker 4>chasing carrots their entire lives and never fully feeling full.

0:19:05.280 --> 0:19:05.520
<v Speaker 3>You know.

0:19:05.600 --> 0:19:08.600
<v Speaker 4>It's like you can chase all the next rung on

0:19:08.720 --> 0:19:13.600
<v Speaker 4>the career ladder, the next title or status or salary band.

0:19:14.240 --> 0:19:18.719
<v Speaker 4>But unlike these sort of material things of the working world,

0:19:19.160 --> 0:19:23.680
<v Speaker 4>religion is less easily falsifiable, you know. And I don't

0:19:23.680 --> 0:19:27.399
<v Speaker 4>think we necessarily have to all find whatever, you know,

0:19:27.520 --> 0:19:30.639
<v Speaker 4>God out there exists for us. That's definitely one means

0:19:30.640 --> 0:19:34.679
<v Speaker 4>of doing so. But by having other sources of meaning,

0:19:34.760 --> 0:19:40.200
<v Speaker 4>we're able to just bounce back if say, your manager

0:19:40.240 --> 0:19:44.200
<v Speaker 4>says something disparaging over the course of the work day.

0:19:45.080 --> 0:19:47.600
<v Speaker 4>If you can show up as as a good father

0:19:47.760 --> 0:19:51.000
<v Speaker 4>that night, or show up as a good third basement

0:19:51.119 --> 0:19:55.159
<v Speaker 4>for your recreational softball team, or show up as you know,

0:19:55.240 --> 0:19:58.000
<v Speaker 4>a very present friend to a buddy who is going

0:19:58.040 --> 0:20:01.560
<v Speaker 4>through something. All of those I identities can help soften

0:20:01.800 --> 0:20:05.880
<v Speaker 4>the inevitable bumps we face them along the reative work.

0:20:06.119 --> 0:20:07.680
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and the places where work falls short.

0:20:07.680 --> 0:20:10.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm still gunning for that senior podcast host title that

0:20:10.359 --> 0:20:13.400
<v Speaker 1>Matt has not bestowed any but I don't know, maybe.

0:20:13.200 --> 0:20:14.000
<v Speaker 3>Soon, two more years.

0:20:14.680 --> 0:20:16.840
<v Speaker 1>It's always two more years ago. I know you've always

0:20:16.840 --> 0:20:18.119
<v Speaker 1>he hold that like a care in front of me

0:20:18.160 --> 0:20:20.359
<v Speaker 1>that I could never attain. But we've got more questions

0:20:20.359 --> 0:20:22.399
<v Speaker 1>we want to get to with you, Cimo. We sespecially

0:20:22.400 --> 0:20:25.320
<v Speaker 1>want to talk about the role that passion or fulfillment

0:20:25.359 --> 0:20:27.760
<v Speaker 1>plays and work like do we need to divorce it completely?

0:20:28.080 --> 0:20:29.800
<v Speaker 1>And so we'll get to questions on that and maybe

0:20:29.800 --> 0:20:33.240
<v Speaker 1>some practical suggestions for how to find to start to

0:20:33.280 --> 0:20:36.960
<v Speaker 1>remove our identity from mostly being centered around our work.

0:20:37.000 --> 0:20:39.200
<v Speaker 1>We'll get to some of those those questions dot combo

0:20:39.280 --> 0:20:39.800
<v Speaker 1>right after this.

0:20:49.240 --> 0:20:50.280
<v Speaker 3>All right, we are back from.

0:20:50.160 --> 0:20:54.160
<v Speaker 2>The break talking to Cimo stoles Off about the good

0:20:54.320 --> 0:20:57.959
<v Speaker 2>enough job and Sema talk to us about meaning, talk

0:20:58.000 --> 0:21:01.080
<v Speaker 2>to us about purpose and work, because it certainly seems.

0:21:00.800 --> 0:21:02.600
<v Speaker 3>Like that there is this this.

0:21:02.520 --> 0:21:06.240
<v Speaker 2>Push to find like ultimate fulfillment in your career. But

0:21:06.640 --> 0:21:09.800
<v Speaker 2>how do you think we should think about that role,

0:21:10.119 --> 0:21:12.159
<v Speaker 2>specifically the role that passion plays in our in our

0:21:12.240 --> 0:21:14.160
<v Speaker 2>nine to five, Like, is the dream job?

0:21:14.200 --> 0:21:15.560
<v Speaker 3>Is it just a pipe dream at this point?

0:21:15.840 --> 0:21:17.760
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, it's a good question, you know. And I think

0:21:17.920 --> 0:21:20.800
<v Speaker 4>when you like look at the cover of the book

0:21:20.920 --> 0:21:23.080
<v Speaker 4>or even read the title, you know, the subtitle is

0:21:23.160 --> 0:21:27.120
<v Speaker 4>Reclaiming Life from Work, you might assume that my argument

0:21:27.240 --> 0:21:29.439
<v Speaker 4>is some it's like anti work, you know. And this

0:21:29.520 --> 0:21:32.399
<v Speaker 4>idea of like anti work has become a bit of

0:21:32.440 --> 0:21:36.920
<v Speaker 4>a meme or trend recently. There's a huge subreddit about

0:21:36.960 --> 0:21:39.520
<v Speaker 4>anti work, and it's there's a lot of cultural cachet

0:21:39.640 --> 0:21:43.479
<v Speaker 4>and being able to be like anti capitalist or against

0:21:43.520 --> 0:21:46.960
<v Speaker 4>the man. And yet I don't think that going full

0:21:47.000 --> 0:21:51.240
<v Speaker 4>on to that end of the spectrum is necessarily helpful

0:21:51.560 --> 0:21:55.040
<v Speaker 4>or will be a recipe for fulfillment when it comes

0:21:55.080 --> 0:21:58.360
<v Speaker 4>to passion. You know, I think I have certainly derived

0:21:58.640 --> 0:22:01.840
<v Speaker 4>a lot of meaning and purpose and passion from my

0:22:02.000 --> 0:22:05.240
<v Speaker 4>work myself. But I think, you know, I rely a

0:22:05.240 --> 0:22:08.639
<v Speaker 4>lot on this chapter of the research of this woman

0:22:08.960 --> 0:22:11.960
<v Speaker 4>at Michigan State named Aaron Check who wrote this book

0:22:12.000 --> 0:22:15.639
<v Speaker 4>called The Trouble with Passion, And basically her argument is

0:22:15.680 --> 0:22:19.640
<v Speaker 4>that not all of us have the same on ramps

0:22:19.680 --> 0:22:23.720
<v Speaker 4>to be able to translate our passions into our means

0:22:23.760 --> 0:22:28.560
<v Speaker 4>of making money, and for people who have fewer opportunities,

0:22:28.880 --> 0:22:32.800
<v Speaker 4>it can actually exacerbate inner quality when we tell everyone

0:22:32.920 --> 0:22:36.199
<v Speaker 4>to follow their passion, but some people don't have as

0:22:36.280 --> 0:22:39.880
<v Speaker 4>much access to passion jobs as others. And I think

0:22:39.920 --> 0:22:43.159
<v Speaker 4>a lot of times, you know, passion can be a

0:22:43.200 --> 0:22:47.879
<v Speaker 4>stand in for fair compensation or fair pay. There's this

0:22:47.920 --> 0:22:50.919
<v Speaker 4>concept in the book I talk about that's called vocational AWE,

0:22:51.359 --> 0:22:55.440
<v Speaker 4>which is the idea that certain industries have a sort

0:22:55.480 --> 0:22:59.280
<v Speaker 4>of perceived righteousness, like a halo effect. I'm thinking about

0:22:59.320 --> 0:23:03.919
<v Speaker 4>things like healthcare workers, or like teachers, or people that

0:23:03.960 --> 0:23:07.400
<v Speaker 4>work in the nonprofit sector. And it was a concept

0:23:07.480 --> 0:23:09.920
<v Speaker 4>that was originally coined by this librarian, this woman named

0:23:09.920 --> 0:23:14.359
<v Speaker 4>Fobasi Utar, and she observed how this sort of rhetoric

0:23:14.480 --> 0:23:18.679
<v Speaker 4>around follow your passion or you know, vocational awe, like

0:23:18.800 --> 0:23:20.879
<v Speaker 4>the idea that you should be in it for something

0:23:20.920 --> 0:23:24.240
<v Speaker 4>more than the money, can actually cover up a lot

0:23:24.359 --> 0:23:28.439
<v Speaker 4>of the malpractice and exploitation that exists within all of

0:23:28.480 --> 0:23:31.520
<v Speaker 4>these different fields. You know, I've this mentor this woman

0:23:31.600 --> 0:23:34.280
<v Speaker 4>and Helen Peterson, and she says, most of the time

0:23:34.320 --> 0:23:37.040
<v Speaker 4>all passion can get you is the excuse to be

0:23:37.119 --> 0:23:41.200
<v Speaker 4>paid very little. And so you know, it's a fine balance. Obviously,

0:23:41.320 --> 0:23:43.800
<v Speaker 4>you know, we work more than we do just about

0:23:43.800 --> 0:23:45.919
<v Speaker 4>anything else in our life, and you know how we

0:23:45.960 --> 0:23:50.480
<v Speaker 4>spend those hours matter. But I think being clear headed

0:23:50.520 --> 0:23:52.800
<v Speaker 4>about the fact that work is first and foremost an

0:23:52.800 --> 0:23:56.400
<v Speaker 4>economic contract. It's an exchange of your time and your

0:23:56.480 --> 0:23:59.560
<v Speaker 4>labor for money. The better it can certainly be more

0:23:59.560 --> 0:24:02.359
<v Speaker 4>than those things. But I think the more sort of

0:24:02.359 --> 0:24:04.960
<v Speaker 4>clear headed we can be about its fundamental purpose, the

0:24:05.080 --> 0:24:05.800
<v Speaker 4>better off will be.

0:24:06.440 --> 0:24:07.320
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. I like that.

0:24:08.040 --> 0:24:11.399
<v Speaker 1>Okay, you talked too about how like stagnating wages, and

0:24:11.440 --> 0:24:14.560
<v Speaker 1>we've seen a little bit of that change recently. We've

0:24:14.560 --> 0:24:16.879
<v Speaker 1>seen kind of especially at the lower end of the

0:24:16.920 --> 0:24:21.879
<v Speaker 1>income spectrum. We've seen higher paces in wage growth, still

0:24:22.000 --> 0:24:25.240
<v Speaker 1>not making up for lots of decades where that wasn't happening.

0:24:25.440 --> 0:24:29.040
<v Speaker 1>But I guess so there is that element where for

0:24:29.359 --> 0:24:32.359
<v Speaker 1>a lot of folks pay hasn't kept up and so

0:24:32.480 --> 0:24:34.520
<v Speaker 1>having to work more hours just to make ends meet

0:24:34.960 --> 0:24:36.680
<v Speaker 1>is a thing for sure. But I guess I want

0:24:36.680 --> 0:24:39.160
<v Speaker 1>to ask you too, there's a lot of people Matt

0:24:39.160 --> 0:24:40.360
<v Speaker 1>and I talk about this all the time. We see

0:24:40.359 --> 0:24:42.560
<v Speaker 1>stats where people make two hundred k a year and

0:24:42.560 --> 0:24:45.040
<v Speaker 1>they're still living paycheck to paycheck. So often for a

0:24:45.040 --> 0:24:46.720
<v Speaker 1>lot of people, it's not just that they're not getting

0:24:46.720 --> 0:24:49.760
<v Speaker 1>paid enough. So do you think not being a personal

0:24:49.760 --> 0:24:52.000
<v Speaker 1>finance nerd to the extead of Matt and I like

0:24:52.080 --> 0:24:55.600
<v Speaker 1>our poor savings habits in that intense reliance on that

0:24:55.680 --> 0:24:58.280
<v Speaker 1>income from our day job, does that make matters worse

0:24:58.359 --> 0:25:00.960
<v Speaker 1>that we are basically we tied at the hip to

0:25:00.960 --> 0:25:03.320
<v Speaker 1>our employer, that we don't have enough margin or if

0:25:03.359 --> 0:25:04.960
<v Speaker 1>we did lose our job or if we wanted to

0:25:05.000 --> 0:25:08.840
<v Speaker 1>pursue something else, that we don't really have that ability totally.

0:25:08.920 --> 0:25:10.840
<v Speaker 4>Yeah. I mean, I think there's sort of like two

0:25:10.880 --> 0:25:14.040
<v Speaker 4>parts to the question. There's one is like the what

0:25:14.080 --> 0:25:18.920
<v Speaker 4>we've observed in the pandemic, where the just a monochrome

0:25:18.960 --> 0:25:22.240
<v Speaker 4>of kind of social support from the government allowed a

0:25:22.280 --> 0:25:25.359
<v Speaker 4>lot of people to leave jobs that weren't good enough

0:25:25.440 --> 0:25:28.560
<v Speaker 4>for them. And so, you know, I think one of

0:25:28.000 --> 0:25:32.800
<v Speaker 4>the misconceptions about the Great Resignation was that it was

0:25:32.920 --> 0:25:35.320
<v Speaker 4>just people kind of dropping out of the labor force

0:25:35.720 --> 0:25:38.800
<v Speaker 4>and sitting on their couch all day, Whereas an actuality,

0:25:39.080 --> 0:25:42.920
<v Speaker 4>the majority of people that left jobs during the heart

0:25:42.920 --> 0:25:46.960
<v Speaker 4>of the pandemic actually just left to find better jobs.

0:25:47.800 --> 0:25:50.080
<v Speaker 4>So I think that's really important to consider. It's like,

0:25:50.160 --> 0:25:53.200
<v Speaker 4>when we feel like there is a little bit of

0:25:53.800 --> 0:25:58.000
<v Speaker 4>government support or just a less fraid social safety net,

0:25:58.200 --> 0:26:01.520
<v Speaker 4>people feel more empowered or define work that works better

0:26:01.600 --> 0:26:04.959
<v Speaker 4>for them. And then there's kind of the second half

0:26:04.640 --> 0:26:08.800
<v Speaker 4>of your question, which is, you know, thinking about people

0:26:09.480 --> 0:26:13.360
<v Speaker 4>and that we're making a lot of money that might

0:26:13.400 --> 0:26:17.240
<v Speaker 4>not have very much slack and their budget or their

0:26:17.280 --> 0:26:19.080
<v Speaker 4>spending habits. And I think a lot of that comes

0:26:19.080 --> 0:26:23.080
<v Speaker 4>back to sort of the consumerism that is so prevalent

0:26:23.119 --> 0:26:26.560
<v Speaker 4>in America and the pressure to always be spending and

0:26:26.680 --> 0:26:29.680
<v Speaker 4>keeping up with the joneses and having the nice new

0:26:29.760 --> 0:26:32.680
<v Speaker 4>thing and sort of foregoing some of the long term

0:26:32.720 --> 0:26:38.159
<v Speaker 4>benefits that we can get from saving or having just

0:26:38.240 --> 0:26:41.600
<v Speaker 4>you know, more resiliency built into your budget, versus the

0:26:41.640 --> 0:26:44.479
<v Speaker 4>sort of short term rash of getting something that's shiny

0:26:44.520 --> 0:26:45.800
<v Speaker 4>and new consumerism.

0:26:45.840 --> 0:26:47.320
<v Speaker 3>I'm not sure what you're talking about. I haven't seen

0:26:47.359 --> 0:26:48.359
<v Speaker 3>that play off this country.

0:26:48.840 --> 0:26:52.040
<v Speaker 2>We talk about that all Batari here on the show Cimo,

0:26:52.400 --> 0:26:54.560
<v Speaker 2>you were discussing how it's like, is it it's like

0:26:54.600 --> 0:26:58.680
<v Speaker 2>a chicken or egg situation where we are spending therefore

0:26:58.680 --> 0:27:01.560
<v Speaker 2>we have to earn more or is it, Oh, we

0:27:01.720 --> 0:27:05.680
<v Speaker 2>don't have the time to dedicate towards developing our identity

0:27:05.680 --> 0:27:07.800
<v Speaker 2>outside of work because we are working so much. It's

0:27:07.840 --> 0:27:11.440
<v Speaker 2>this sort of doom loop that we find ourselves stuck in.

0:27:12.040 --> 0:27:14.000
<v Speaker 2>And I think that's definitely true when it comes to

0:27:14.080 --> 0:27:17.280
<v Speaker 2>our personal finances and how that's intertwined.

0:27:16.760 --> 0:27:17.800
<v Speaker 3>With our careers as well.

0:27:18.000 --> 0:27:20.479
<v Speaker 2>One of the other myths that you tackle, that you

0:27:20.520 --> 0:27:25.320
<v Speaker 2>address is that our coworkers, how we should not necessarily

0:27:25.400 --> 0:27:28.920
<v Speaker 2>view them as family. Oftentimes folks just they believe that line.

0:27:29.080 --> 0:27:30.960
<v Speaker 2>And I'll talk into a buddy of mind, and he's

0:27:31.000 --> 0:27:34.800
<v Speaker 2>after getting laid off. He he highlighted the fact that, man,

0:27:34.920 --> 0:27:37.040
<v Speaker 2>you know, this is a line that I believed. It's

0:27:37.119 --> 0:27:39.679
<v Speaker 2>I'm a manager myself. We live by this line. But

0:27:39.760 --> 0:27:41.399
<v Speaker 2>when the time comes and you get laid off, you

0:27:41.480 --> 0:27:45.159
<v Speaker 2>quickly realize that your family left or coworkers are not

0:27:45.280 --> 0:27:45.880
<v Speaker 2>your family.

0:27:46.359 --> 0:27:47.600
<v Speaker 3>Why is that such a problem?

0:27:48.160 --> 0:27:52.240
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I think you know, the desire to form close

0:27:52.359 --> 0:27:56.640
<v Speaker 4>bonds at work isn't misguided, and there have been lots

0:27:56.680 --> 0:27:59.400
<v Speaker 4>of studies to back this up. People that have close

0:27:59.440 --> 0:28:02.240
<v Speaker 4>friends that work tend to be more fulfilled by the job,

0:28:02.320 --> 0:28:05.159
<v Speaker 4>they tend to stay at jobs longer, and so it

0:28:05.200 --> 0:28:09.640
<v Speaker 4>should come as no surprise that companies and especially leaders

0:28:09.960 --> 0:28:13.439
<v Speaker 4>sometimes use the rhetoric of family and the sort of

0:28:13.840 --> 0:28:18.320
<v Speaker 4>bonds that bind us together to try and inspire employees

0:28:18.359 --> 0:28:22.120
<v Speaker 4>to work for the cause or to stay at their

0:28:22.160 --> 0:28:26.520
<v Speaker 4>companies for longer. And I think, similar to your friends,

0:28:26.640 --> 0:28:31.040
<v Speaker 4>so many people have seen over the past two years,

0:28:31.080 --> 0:28:35.439
<v Speaker 4>how that rhetoric can be very shallow. You know, you

0:28:35.480 --> 0:28:39.840
<v Speaker 4>can't fire someone from your company. But even if it

0:28:39.960 --> 0:28:42.840
<v Speaker 4>was true that your workplace could be like your family,

0:28:42.880 --> 0:28:45.640
<v Speaker 4>I'm not sure that's something that we should aspire to.

0:28:45.880 --> 0:28:47.760
<v Speaker 4>You know, most of the families that I know are

0:28:47.800 --> 0:28:51.480
<v Speaker 4>pretty dysfunctional in one way or another. You know, and

0:28:51.560 --> 0:28:54.560
<v Speaker 4>so in some ways the question about like workplace as

0:28:54.640 --> 0:28:57.920
<v Speaker 4>family is sort of just a semantic distinction and just

0:28:57.960 --> 0:29:01.360
<v Speaker 4>about this idea of like how much of our relationship

0:29:01.440 --> 0:29:05.440
<v Speaker 4>should be center in the workplace. And you know, I

0:29:05.440 --> 0:29:09.160
<v Speaker 4>think the argument that I make is like, it's not

0:29:09.520 --> 0:29:13.400
<v Speaker 4>necessarily a problem to have friends at work, but I

0:29:13.440 --> 0:29:17.120
<v Speaker 4>think if your workplace is your sole source of community,

0:29:17.560 --> 0:29:21.280
<v Speaker 4>that is a narrow platform to balance on, you're prone

0:29:21.360 --> 0:29:24.120
<v Speaker 4>to be blown over by a strong gust of wind,

0:29:24.280 --> 0:29:29.080
<v Speaker 4>whether that is getting laid off or your quote unquote

0:29:29.080 --> 0:29:33.080
<v Speaker 4>family member having to give you some tough love in

0:29:33.440 --> 0:29:37.240
<v Speaker 4>the sake of further in the business goals, or even

0:29:37.480 --> 0:29:41.640
<v Speaker 4>just the sort of negative consequences of the sort of

0:29:41.680 --> 0:29:44.880
<v Speaker 4>in groups and the clicks that can form at work.

0:29:45.200 --> 0:29:49.080
<v Speaker 4>There's been research that has found that in more familial workplaces,

0:29:49.480 --> 0:29:54.000
<v Speaker 4>workers are less likely to speak up about wrongdoing, They're

0:29:54.080 --> 0:29:58.640
<v Speaker 4>less likely to be transparent, they're less likely to make

0:29:58.680 --> 0:30:03.360
<v Speaker 4>decisions based on sound business analysis and rigor as opposed

0:30:03.400 --> 0:30:05.640
<v Speaker 4>to just sort of like trusting what your buddy says.

0:30:06.000 --> 0:30:09.520
<v Speaker 4>And so, you know, there are actual material consequences of

0:30:09.600 --> 0:30:14.400
<v Speaker 4>relying too much on social ties as opposed to fundamentally

0:30:14.480 --> 0:30:17.800
<v Speaker 4>what a professional relationship should be, which is based on

0:30:17.880 --> 0:30:20.120
<v Speaker 4>your material goals for the company.

0:30:20.640 --> 0:30:22.920
<v Speaker 1>So it makes me think of the last real job

0:30:22.960 --> 0:30:24.640
<v Speaker 1>I had. Fortunately, I don't have a real job now,

0:30:24.680 --> 0:30:27.360
<v Speaker 1>I just podcast, but the last real job I had,

0:30:27.600 --> 0:30:29.080
<v Speaker 1>there was this thing where once a month they would

0:30:29.080 --> 0:30:31.760
<v Speaker 1>give one hundred dollars awards to like ten different people

0:30:31.760 --> 0:30:33.960
<v Speaker 1>in the company for going above and beyond and for

0:30:34.040 --> 0:30:38.800
<v Speaker 1>doing something just of incredible dedication to the company and

0:30:38.800 --> 0:30:41.840
<v Speaker 1>to the company's efforts. And the people who got rewarded

0:30:42.080 --> 0:30:43.800
<v Speaker 1>is like literally just I mean a hundred bucks. I'm

0:30:43.800 --> 0:30:45.120
<v Speaker 1>not saying one hundred bucks is nothing, but it was

0:30:45.120 --> 0:30:48.360
<v Speaker 1>one hundred bucks. And it was oftentimes somebody who came

0:30:48.400 --> 0:30:51.160
<v Speaker 1>in on the weekend who like left their family in

0:30:51.200 --> 0:30:53.040
<v Speaker 1>the lurch to come take care of something at work.

0:30:53.040 --> 0:30:54.960
<v Speaker 1>And I was like, I'm making it my personal goal

0:30:55.000 --> 0:30:57.960
<v Speaker 1>to never win this award because it felt like that

0:30:58.200 --> 0:31:03.000
<v Speaker 1>was asking too much, creating a tie that it didn't

0:31:03.040 --> 0:31:06.600
<v Speaker 1>deserve that sort of stranglehold over my life. And I

0:31:06.600 --> 0:31:09.240
<v Speaker 1>could tell so many people prided themselves I'm being able

0:31:09.280 --> 0:31:12.160
<v Speaker 1>to win this one hundred dollars recognition in front of

0:31:12.160 --> 0:31:14.960
<v Speaker 1>their coworker sort of thing. And I had just the

0:31:14.960 --> 0:31:18.000
<v Speaker 1>opposite stance, and I was like, this is absurd and

0:31:18.080 --> 0:31:20.959
<v Speaker 1>there's no way I ever want to be found up

0:31:20.960 --> 0:31:23.080
<v Speaker 1>on that podium accepting the award because it will have

0:31:23.200 --> 0:31:26.760
<v Speaker 1>meant that I dropped obligations and duties that matter a

0:31:26.800 --> 0:31:28.840
<v Speaker 1>whole lot to me. So I guess that's where I

0:31:28.840 --> 0:31:31.960
<v Speaker 1>want to ask, too, how do we find create a

0:31:32.000 --> 0:31:34.200
<v Speaker 1>proper attachment to work or we are working hard, where

0:31:34.200 --> 0:31:37.560
<v Speaker 1>we're producing good work, where we are a part of

0:31:37.560 --> 0:31:41.680
<v Speaker 1>the organization in a meaningful way without going above and beyond.

0:31:41.920 --> 0:31:43.400
<v Speaker 1>We don't want to be laxa Daisa whole, but we

0:31:43.400 --> 0:31:50.160
<v Speaker 1>also don't want to over exert ourselves and basically inhibit

0:31:50.600 --> 0:31:55.280
<v Speaker 1>the ability for those other identity forming necessities to take place.

0:31:56.120 --> 0:31:58.160
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I mean, I love the question. It reminds me

0:31:58.200 --> 0:32:01.560
<v Speaker 4>of office space where to for anistans wearing the vest

0:32:01.640 --> 0:32:02.800
<v Speaker 4>with like flair at the.

0:32:02.720 --> 0:32:05.360
<v Speaker 2>Restaurant pieces of flair exactly.

0:32:05.400 --> 0:32:08.680
<v Speaker 4>It's like, you know, she's wearing what the expectation was set,

0:32:08.760 --> 0:32:11.320
<v Speaker 4>but like the idea is that you shouldn't wear the minimum.

0:32:11.360 --> 0:32:13.640
<v Speaker 4>You should be going above and beyond and wearing the

0:32:13.680 --> 0:32:16.480
<v Speaker 4>most flair you know. And I think, like it's amazing

0:32:16.640 --> 0:32:20.880
<v Speaker 4>how easy sometimes it is to incentivize workers to stay

0:32:20.960 --> 0:32:24.239
<v Speaker 4>late or to work on the weekends. There's sort of

0:32:24.240 --> 0:32:26.520
<v Speaker 4>like the equivalent of like the free T shirt that

0:32:26.600 --> 0:32:28.400
<v Speaker 4>you can get, you know, like, what is about one

0:32:28.440 --> 0:32:31.040
<v Speaker 4>hundred dollars actually costing the company or what is it

0:32:31.080 --> 0:32:34.840
<v Speaker 4>costing you? So in the book, I advocate for a

0:32:34.840 --> 0:32:38.440
<v Speaker 4>more transactional approach to work. And it might sound crass

0:32:38.440 --> 0:32:40.959
<v Speaker 4>to treat a job as a transaction, you know, especially

0:32:41.000 --> 0:32:42.880
<v Speaker 4>because we've been told that jobs are meant to be

0:32:43.520 --> 0:32:48.160
<v Speaker 4>meanings and identities and vocations and callings, not mere paychecks.

0:32:48.200 --> 0:32:51.800
<v Speaker 4>But I think a more transactional approach to work can

0:32:51.880 --> 0:32:56.880
<v Speaker 4>actually benefit both employers and employees. I think it freese

0:32:56.960 --> 0:33:01.960
<v Speaker 4>employers to be able to be straightforward about what the

0:33:02.000 --> 0:33:06.160
<v Speaker 4>expectations for good work looks like, to be clear and

0:33:06.280 --> 0:33:09.440
<v Speaker 4>setting up you know, this is what success would mean,

0:33:09.440 --> 0:33:12.040
<v Speaker 4>and these are the numbers that we're hoping you hit.

0:33:12.160 --> 0:33:14.960
<v Speaker 4>This is the sort of standards that we have here

0:33:15.000 --> 0:33:19.000
<v Speaker 4>as a company. And it frees employeees to you know,

0:33:19.120 --> 0:33:22.200
<v Speaker 4>talk about compensation in a fair way and not think

0:33:22.240 --> 0:33:25.640
<v Speaker 4>that somehow talking about money is undermining the best interest

0:33:25.720 --> 0:33:30.239
<v Speaker 4>of the company. It freese employees to understand what is

0:33:30.320 --> 0:33:34.800
<v Speaker 4>expected of them, and more than anything, it frees employees

0:33:34.840 --> 0:33:38.240
<v Speaker 4>to treat work as part of, but not the entirety,

0:33:38.400 --> 0:33:40.840
<v Speaker 4>of their lives. And you know, we're talking a lot

0:33:40.840 --> 0:33:44.560
<v Speaker 4>about quiet quitting and workers that are sort of phoning

0:33:44.560 --> 0:33:48.960
<v Speaker 4>it in. I don't actually think that is a recipe

0:33:49.040 --> 0:33:53.600
<v Speaker 4>for fulfillment or happiness either, you know, Like, I'm sure

0:33:53.640 --> 0:33:56.360
<v Speaker 4>we can all relate to the workdays where you don't

0:33:56.400 --> 0:33:58.680
<v Speaker 4>have enough work to do and you're sort of just

0:33:58.720 --> 0:34:02.880
<v Speaker 4>twiddling your thumbs and the clock is moving slower than

0:34:03.040 --> 0:34:06.560
<v Speaker 4>you thought was humanly possible. I think treating work as

0:34:06.600 --> 0:34:10.520
<v Speaker 4>like a necessary evil is not necessarily a recipe for

0:34:10.560 --> 0:34:13.560
<v Speaker 4>fulfillment either. But I think why social media was invented

0:34:14.840 --> 0:34:17.880
<v Speaker 4>exactly just to fill all the it's like as it

0:34:18.160 --> 0:34:21.400
<v Speaker 4>fills all the unoccupied space in our days. But you know,

0:34:21.440 --> 0:34:23.919
<v Speaker 4>I think it's it's finding that balance of like, what

0:34:24.040 --> 0:34:26.800
<v Speaker 4>do you want works role to be in your life?

0:34:26.920 --> 0:34:30.400
<v Speaker 4>How does that intersect with the necessities to do a

0:34:30.440 --> 0:34:33.919
<v Speaker 4>good enough job for your company, and how you can

0:34:33.920 --> 0:34:36.879
<v Speaker 4>invest the time and energy that you have in other

0:34:36.920 --> 0:34:38.799
<v Speaker 4>aspects of who you are. What I like about the

0:34:38.880 --> 0:34:41.560
<v Speaker 4>sort of title of the book, The Good Enough Job,

0:34:41.880 --> 0:34:45.120
<v Speaker 4>is that it's intentionally subjective. You know, you get to

0:34:45.160 --> 0:34:48.480
<v Speaker 4>decide what good enough means to you. Maybe it's a

0:34:48.600 --> 0:34:51.120
<v Speaker 4>job that pays a certain amount of money, or maybe

0:34:51.120 --> 0:34:53.160
<v Speaker 4>it's a job that has a certain title or is

0:34:53.200 --> 0:34:55.680
<v Speaker 4>in a certain industry, or maybe it's a job that

0:34:55.800 --> 0:34:58.000
<v Speaker 4>gets off at a certain hour so that you can

0:34:58.360 --> 0:35:01.560
<v Speaker 4>pick up your kids from childcare. But whatever sort of

0:35:01.600 --> 0:35:05.600
<v Speaker 4>your definition of good enough is, I employ you to

0:35:05.640 --> 0:35:09.400
<v Speaker 4>recognize when you have it, because that's what will allow

0:35:09.480 --> 0:35:14.080
<v Speaker 4>you to set better boundaries around when you can say

0:35:14.200 --> 0:35:17.720
<v Speaker 4>the workday is done and not necessarily feel like you're always,

0:35:18.840 --> 0:35:21.600
<v Speaker 4>you know, somehow fallen behind if you're not getting ahead.

0:35:22.080 --> 0:35:22.520
<v Speaker 3>That's right.

0:35:22.600 --> 0:35:25.839
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Well, like you said, it's not necessarily a bad thing.

0:35:25.880 --> 0:35:29.200
<v Speaker 2>It's not, and it also shouldn't be your sole focus.

0:35:29.239 --> 0:35:31.839
<v Speaker 2>It's so hard to find that balance. But you've talked

0:35:31.880 --> 0:35:34.600
<v Speaker 2>about setting some of these boundaries here in your book,

0:35:34.640 --> 0:35:36.080
<v Speaker 2>and we're actually going to get to some of the

0:35:36.080 --> 0:35:40.680
<v Speaker 2>practical ways that we can try to help decide for

0:35:40.800 --> 0:35:42.960
<v Speaker 2>ourselves what the good enough job is.

0:35:43.120 --> 0:35:45.040
<v Speaker 3>We'll get to all of that right after this.

0:35:54.640 --> 0:35:56.400
<v Speaker 1>All right, we're back from the break, still talking with

0:35:56.520 --> 0:36:00.279
<v Speaker 1>Cimo stoles Off about doing work that's good enough, and

0:36:00.880 --> 0:36:05.239
<v Speaker 1>I really love that framework, but specifically, how do we

0:36:05.320 --> 0:36:08.279
<v Speaker 1>get there with the day job that we've got going on,

0:36:08.560 --> 0:36:12.520
<v Speaker 1>whether we're self employed or we have, you know, a

0:36:12.680 --> 0:36:15.520
<v Speaker 1>W two job. Let's talk simo for a second about

0:36:15.640 --> 0:36:19.040
<v Speaker 1>drawing better work boundaries, because I love the concept, but

0:36:19.480 --> 0:36:21.479
<v Speaker 1>in practice it seems like it could be a little

0:36:21.480 --> 0:36:24.040
<v Speaker 1>more difficult. How do we make sure that we're working

0:36:24.120 --> 0:36:26.800
<v Speaker 1>the way we want, not being rung dry by our employer,

0:36:26.800 --> 0:36:28.719
<v Speaker 1>and that we still get to keep our job right

0:36:28.760 --> 0:36:30.640
<v Speaker 1>because we still got to pay the mortgage or the

0:36:30.640 --> 0:36:31.680
<v Speaker 1>rents or whatever it is.

0:36:32.160 --> 0:36:35.040
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, totally, I think you know the question with boundaries,

0:36:35.520 --> 0:36:38.480
<v Speaker 4>it is tricky. It can be a fine line, literally,

0:36:39.200 --> 0:36:42.880
<v Speaker 4>and I think sometimes those boundaries are incumbent on the

0:36:42.920 --> 0:36:46.560
<v Speaker 4>worker to draw and sometimes the responsibility should actually lie

0:36:46.960 --> 0:36:50.640
<v Speaker 4>on the employer. My mentor that I mentioned earlier, and

0:36:50.760 --> 0:36:53.720
<v Speaker 4>Helen Peterson, she has this great distinction between the difference

0:36:53.760 --> 0:36:57.640
<v Speaker 4>between boundaries and guardrails. You can think about boundaries as

0:36:57.680 --> 0:37:00.279
<v Speaker 4>sort of like the line and then the all of

0:37:00.280 --> 0:37:03.000
<v Speaker 4>the highway that keeps you from going to from one

0:37:03.080 --> 0:37:06.840
<v Speaker 4>lane to another, whereas guardrails are structural. They're put in

0:37:07.320 --> 0:37:10.440
<v Speaker 4>place by the state they're the metal things on the

0:37:10.480 --> 0:37:13.000
<v Speaker 4>side of the road that keep you from going over.

0:37:13.600 --> 0:37:15.440
<v Speaker 4>And I think, you know, one of the problems with

0:37:15.600 --> 0:37:20.759
<v Speaker 4>individually imposed boundaries is that they inevitably break. You know,

0:37:20.800 --> 0:37:24.080
<v Speaker 4>you can have an intention to work less, but if

0:37:24.080 --> 0:37:27.520
<v Speaker 4>there is a deadline, or it's near the end of

0:37:27.560 --> 0:37:30.560
<v Speaker 4>the quarter and you have a quarterly sales goal, or

0:37:30.800 --> 0:37:34.279
<v Speaker 4>your boss tells you to work more hours, it can

0:37:34.320 --> 0:37:36.680
<v Speaker 4>be hard to raise your hand and be like, actually,

0:37:36.760 --> 0:37:39.800
<v Speaker 4>I have a boundary, you know. I mean, I definitely

0:37:39.840 --> 0:37:42.600
<v Speaker 4>found this in writing the book, you know, the great

0:37:42.640 --> 0:37:45.600
<v Speaker 4>Irony said, I was like working on this book about

0:37:45.640 --> 0:37:49.080
<v Speaker 4>the culture of overwork in America, and in many ways

0:37:49.080 --> 0:37:53.240
<v Speaker 4>I was my own worst manager then. So I would,

0:37:53.640 --> 0:37:57.759
<v Speaker 4>you know, feel crappy on weeks where I didn't hit

0:37:57.800 --> 0:38:00.759
<v Speaker 4>my writing goal and it wouldn't have to open up

0:38:00.800 --> 0:38:03.279
<v Speaker 4>the laptop on the weekend, even though I had a

0:38:03.360 --> 0:38:05.640
<v Speaker 4>quote unquote boundary that I didn't want to do that.

0:38:06.120 --> 0:38:07.799
<v Speaker 4>And so I think, you know, the first point is

0:38:07.800 --> 0:38:11.120
<v Speaker 4>that a lot of the onus to set these boundaries

0:38:11.280 --> 0:38:15.200
<v Speaker 4>actually should rest on the company and on managers and

0:38:15.480 --> 0:38:19.000
<v Speaker 4>creating cultures where it's okay for people to take time off,

0:38:19.080 --> 0:38:23.040
<v Speaker 4>creating plans in place for distributing the workload so that

0:38:23.200 --> 0:38:26.160
<v Speaker 4>there isn't an undue burden placed on any individual, hiring

0:38:26.280 --> 0:38:30.080
<v Speaker 4>enough employees so that there's enough work, enough workers to

0:38:30.600 --> 0:38:34.319
<v Speaker 4>spread out the work, and also creating norms around like

0:38:34.440 --> 0:38:36.399
<v Speaker 4>when you should be on or.

0:38:36.360 --> 0:38:37.120
<v Speaker 3>Off the clock.

0:38:37.600 --> 0:38:41.160
<v Speaker 4>But I also think that individuals also deserve a certain

0:38:41.360 --> 0:38:44.160
<v Speaker 4>level of responsibility that the one step that I always

0:38:44.200 --> 0:38:47.479
<v Speaker 4>come back to is in Japan they have the most

0:38:47.520 --> 0:38:53.160
<v Speaker 4>progressive parental leave and specifically for fathers parntal Leaf policy

0:38:53.360 --> 0:38:55.840
<v Speaker 4>and the world, fathers are entitled to up to a

0:38:55.920 --> 0:39:00.160
<v Speaker 4>year of paid time after they have a kid. The

0:39:00.200 --> 0:39:04.120
<v Speaker 4>last data that I looked at, only five percent of

0:39:04.440 --> 0:39:08.279
<v Speaker 4>Japanese fathers took the entirety of the time that they

0:39:08.280 --> 0:39:11.240
<v Speaker 4>were allotted, And so it sort of points to these

0:39:11.280 --> 0:39:14.719
<v Speaker 4>two necessities. There needs to be the sort of policies

0:39:14.760 --> 0:39:17.960
<v Speaker 4>in place that allow people to do things other than

0:39:18.000 --> 0:39:21.080
<v Speaker 4>work or prioritize things outside of their work life. But

0:39:21.120 --> 0:39:24.080
<v Speaker 4>there also needs to be the cultural will to do so.

0:39:24.640 --> 0:39:28.399
<v Speaker 4>And I think that is what some of this kind

0:39:28.440 --> 0:39:33.280
<v Speaker 4>of deprogramming or having a sufficiency mindset when it comes

0:39:33.280 --> 0:39:34.520
<v Speaker 4>to work can allow us to do.

0:39:35.280 --> 0:39:38.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's and this is why we love your approach, Cimo.

0:39:38.560 --> 0:39:40.800
<v Speaker 2>I mean, you're finding yourself in the radical middle, because

0:39:40.880 --> 0:39:43.799
<v Speaker 2>I feel like it's easy just to point to one

0:39:43.880 --> 0:39:45.480
<v Speaker 2>end of the spectrum or the other and be like,

0:39:45.600 --> 0:39:49.960
<v Speaker 2>that's the devil if we need to do the or exactly.

0:39:50.000 --> 0:39:52.000
<v Speaker 2>But yeah, you're saying, you know, there is a certain

0:39:52.000 --> 0:39:55.319
<v Speaker 2>degree of responsibility that falls with the actual company, but

0:39:55.560 --> 0:39:57.640
<v Speaker 2>that doesn't mean that we're not off the hook. And

0:39:57.719 --> 0:40:00.560
<v Speaker 2>I think in particular, we need a channel our efforts

0:40:00.600 --> 0:40:03.040
<v Speaker 2>in the areas that I think where we can move

0:40:03.120 --> 0:40:06.040
<v Speaker 2>the needle the most for us as individuals. And when

0:40:06.080 --> 0:40:08.600
<v Speaker 2>it came to for you to talk about some of

0:40:08.640 --> 0:40:10.680
<v Speaker 2>the different boundaries that we can draw in our lives,

0:40:10.760 --> 0:40:12.479
<v Speaker 2>like you talk about too, how there are some folks

0:40:12.520 --> 0:40:15.920
<v Speaker 2>who like to have their work to be more integrated

0:40:15.960 --> 0:40:18.080
<v Speaker 2>within their life, right, And so it's not even saying

0:40:18.120 --> 0:40:20.799
<v Speaker 2>that what you should do is have hard boundaries and

0:40:20.880 --> 0:40:22.799
<v Speaker 2>that's going to be how you're going to be able

0:40:22.800 --> 0:40:26.080
<v Speaker 2>to achieve happiness and a successful life. But it seems

0:40:26.080 --> 0:40:27.719
<v Speaker 2>like you're just asking a lot of questions and you

0:40:27.840 --> 0:40:30.640
<v Speaker 2>want individuals to kind of do the hard work, and

0:40:30.760 --> 0:40:32.919
<v Speaker 2>it seems like that that is at the core of

0:40:32.960 --> 0:40:35.040
<v Speaker 2>The problem here is that a lot of individuals they

0:40:35.080 --> 0:40:38.319
<v Speaker 2>are not doing that difficult work. They're not setting goals

0:40:38.320 --> 0:40:41.600
<v Speaker 2>for themselves. You know, they're chasing status. They're chasing after

0:40:41.719 --> 0:40:45.120
<v Speaker 2>rankings or job titles or salaries as opposed to taking

0:40:45.160 --> 0:40:48.120
<v Speaker 2>the time and thinking through what it is that they

0:40:48.280 --> 0:40:50.080
<v Speaker 2>want for themselves. I mean, do you feel like that

0:40:50.080 --> 0:40:50.640
<v Speaker 2>that's accurate?

0:40:50.960 --> 0:40:54.000
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, totally. And you know, I mean the actual form

0:40:54.000 --> 0:40:56.120
<v Speaker 4>out of the book is a chronicle people's stories in

0:40:56.120 --> 0:40:59.040
<v Speaker 4>different industries, and the one that stands out here is

0:40:59.080 --> 0:41:01.719
<v Speaker 4>the story of a Wall Street banker that I tell

0:41:01.800 --> 0:41:04.600
<v Speaker 4>it's perhaps like the most cliche story in the book.

0:41:04.680 --> 0:41:08.840
<v Speaker 4>This guy was a valedictorian and he went to an

0:41:08.880 --> 0:41:12.280
<v Speaker 4>Ivy League college and got a job on Wall Street

0:41:12.320 --> 0:41:15.360
<v Speaker 4>that paid the most, and quickly rose up the ranks

0:41:15.880 --> 0:41:18.960
<v Speaker 4>of the firm and was one of the youngest vps

0:41:19.000 --> 0:41:22.719
<v Speaker 4>in the firm's history. And from his perch at the

0:41:22.760 --> 0:41:26.440
<v Speaker 4>top of the org chart, he realized that he was

0:41:26.600 --> 0:41:29.400
<v Speaker 4>playing a game that he didn't actually want to win, so,

0:41:29.440 --> 0:41:31.879
<v Speaker 4>you know, and he hadn't taken the time to look

0:41:32.000 --> 0:41:34.879
<v Speaker 4>up and ask, what is it that I actually want?

0:41:35.000 --> 0:41:38.800
<v Speaker 4>You know, he was always just chasing what the market valued.

0:41:39.200 --> 0:41:41.080
<v Speaker 4>But I think you know, the wisdom in his story

0:41:41.160 --> 0:41:44.400
<v Speaker 4>is that the other end of the spectrum, where you

0:41:44.760 --> 0:41:47.920
<v Speaker 4>just think about what you want without considering what the

0:41:47.960 --> 0:41:51.759
<v Speaker 4>market wants, is dangerous as well. It's the kind of

0:41:51.840 --> 0:41:54.279
<v Speaker 4>thing that might get you in a situation where you

0:41:54.360 --> 0:41:57.600
<v Speaker 4>assume a lot of student debt to pursue a graduate

0:41:57.640 --> 0:42:00.520
<v Speaker 4>degree that might not actually lead to job on the

0:42:00.560 --> 0:42:03.920
<v Speaker 4>other end, or a situation where you're an artist but

0:42:04.280 --> 0:42:07.720
<v Speaker 4>you're so preoccupied by how you're going to pay rent

0:42:07.719 --> 0:42:09.759
<v Speaker 4>that you can't actually focus on the art that you

0:42:09.800 --> 0:42:13.000
<v Speaker 4>hope to create. And so, you know, it might be

0:42:13.000 --> 0:42:15.759
<v Speaker 4>a little simplistic, but I think it's really important to

0:42:16.400 --> 0:42:19.400
<v Speaker 4>hold both of those incentives in your hand at the

0:42:19.400 --> 0:42:22.040
<v Speaker 4>same time and thinking about, Okay, what is it that

0:42:22.160 --> 0:42:25.279
<v Speaker 4>I value, what is it that the market values, and

0:42:25.320 --> 0:42:27.479
<v Speaker 4>how can I find work that marries the two.

0:42:28.600 --> 0:42:28.880
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:42:29.320 --> 0:42:31.200
<v Speaker 1>So, one of the things I loved about your book

0:42:31.239 --> 0:42:33.040
<v Speaker 1>was that it wasn't some sort of self help ten

0:42:33.120 --> 0:42:35.799
<v Speaker 1>steps to a better relationship with your job, and it

0:42:36.000 --> 0:42:39.320
<v Speaker 1>was more storytelling. But I guess I am also curious

0:42:39.360 --> 0:42:42.960
<v Speaker 1>at the end, like when we talk about having that

0:42:43.040 --> 0:42:46.400
<v Speaker 1>conversation with your boss, with your direct manager, Let's say

0:42:46.400 --> 0:42:49.359
<v Speaker 1>you've been somewhere for years and you feel like, over

0:42:49.440 --> 0:42:52.520
<v Speaker 1>time there's just been this encroachment and so I feel

0:42:52.520 --> 0:42:55.560
<v Speaker 1>like that of your employer on your own personal time,

0:42:55.920 --> 0:42:58.000
<v Speaker 1>and you found it harder to set boundaries, which I

0:42:58.000 --> 0:42:59.759
<v Speaker 1>think probably a lot of people could relate to that.

0:43:00.280 --> 0:43:02.319
<v Speaker 1>What does it look like then, too, I mean you

0:43:02.400 --> 0:43:05.879
<v Speaker 1>might start looking down the road to work somewhere else, right,

0:43:06.800 --> 0:43:09.400
<v Speaker 1>that's potentially one solution. But what if you're like, I

0:43:09.440 --> 0:43:11.239
<v Speaker 1>really like my job, I would just like to have

0:43:11.280 --> 0:43:14.240
<v Speaker 1>a more normal relationship with it. How would you suggest

0:43:14.280 --> 0:43:17.880
<v Speaker 1>starting to have that conversation with your direct supervisor to

0:43:17.960 --> 0:43:20.879
<v Speaker 1>kind of set up boundaries that are going to make

0:43:20.920 --> 0:43:21.759
<v Speaker 1>sense for both of you.

0:43:22.640 --> 0:43:24.319
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I think you know, there are things that you

0:43:24.320 --> 0:43:26.799
<v Speaker 4>can do within the confines of the workplace, and there

0:43:26.800 --> 0:43:29.239
<v Speaker 4>are things that you can do outside of the workplace.

0:43:29.560 --> 0:43:33.080
<v Speaker 4>When it comes to talking with your manager, I always

0:43:33.120 --> 0:43:36.759
<v Speaker 4>go back to just clarity of expectations. I think one

0:43:36.840 --> 0:43:41.160
<v Speaker 4>thing that drives people to over work is this desire

0:43:41.239 --> 0:43:44.200
<v Speaker 4>to sort of perform that they're doing a good job.

0:43:44.280 --> 0:43:47.000
<v Speaker 4>You know, this in the office world might mean just

0:43:47.040 --> 0:43:49.759
<v Speaker 4>like putting in FaceTime at the office and staying at

0:43:49.800 --> 0:43:53.120
<v Speaker 4>your desk. In the home world, that might be you know,

0:43:53.239 --> 0:43:56.239
<v Speaker 4>just sitting around on Slack or Microsoft teams waiting for

0:43:56.280 --> 0:43:58.960
<v Speaker 4>someone to send you a message. But what we should

0:43:59.040 --> 0:44:02.600
<v Speaker 4>be valuing is the quality of the work itself. And

0:44:02.680 --> 0:44:05.600
<v Speaker 4>so that's where I often start when I advise people

0:44:05.600 --> 0:44:09.480
<v Speaker 4>about talking to their bosses or their managers, having a

0:44:09.600 --> 0:44:13.680
<v Speaker 4>very clear conversation about, Okay, what where are we What

0:44:13.800 --> 0:44:16.120
<v Speaker 4>is the sort of like status of the quality of

0:44:16.120 --> 0:44:20.040
<v Speaker 4>the work that I am producing? Where am I meeting expectations?

0:44:20.080 --> 0:44:23.560
<v Speaker 4>Where am I exceeding expectations? If you want to try

0:44:23.600 --> 0:44:25.880
<v Speaker 4>and get promoted or move to the next level, what

0:44:25.960 --> 0:44:29.200
<v Speaker 4>is the type of work that you are expected to do?

0:44:29.239 --> 0:44:32.840
<v Speaker 4>And just making some of those things clear and so

0:44:33.160 --> 0:44:36.239
<v Speaker 4>you're not just sort of putting in pennies to the

0:44:36.280 --> 0:44:39.200
<v Speaker 4>proverbial work piggybank, hoping to cash out one day, but

0:44:39.280 --> 0:44:43.439
<v Speaker 4>you're actually, you know, working clearly towards what good work

0:44:43.480 --> 0:44:45.960
<v Speaker 4>looks like at your company. When it comes to your

0:44:46.000 --> 0:44:47.080
<v Speaker 4>life outside of work.

0:44:46.960 --> 0:44:49.040
<v Speaker 1>Focusing on the work, I like that, Yeah, yeah, not

0:44:49.160 --> 0:44:51.960
<v Speaker 1>on the other stuff. Hey, oh am I here enough?

0:44:51.960 --> 0:44:55.040
<v Speaker 1>Am I here enough hours? I feel like that. That's presenteeism.

0:44:55.080 --> 0:44:57.759
<v Speaker 1>You start to feel like that's part of the work

0:44:57.800 --> 0:44:58.879
<v Speaker 1>that's required, but that's not.

0:44:58.840 --> 0:44:59.800
<v Speaker 3>The work totally.

0:45:00.120 --> 0:45:02.680
<v Speaker 4>You know, certain industries are just really set up in

0:45:02.680 --> 0:45:04.960
<v Speaker 4>a way that then make this very hard. Like I

0:45:05.000 --> 0:45:07.480
<v Speaker 4>think I'm thinking of like lawyers, for example, who are

0:45:07.520 --> 0:45:11.000
<v Speaker 4>asked to track their billable hours in like six minute

0:45:11.080 --> 0:45:13.320
<v Speaker 4>or fifteen minute increments. And I was talking to a

0:45:13.360 --> 0:45:15.520
<v Speaker 4>few lawyers for the book, and they were saying, you know,

0:45:15.719 --> 0:45:20.239
<v Speaker 4>it is disincentive for me to do efficient work. You

0:45:20.239 --> 0:45:25.560
<v Speaker 4>know that I get no material award for working efficiently

0:45:25.920 --> 0:45:28.680
<v Speaker 4>or doing high quality of work. It's all just about

0:45:28.719 --> 0:45:30.520
<v Speaker 4>the number of hours I spend on the work. And

0:45:30.560 --> 0:45:33.640
<v Speaker 4>that incentive structure is just so backwards, you know. Like

0:45:33.680 --> 0:45:37.600
<v Speaker 4>I understand that lawyers bill hourly, and so there should

0:45:37.600 --> 0:45:40.880
<v Speaker 4>be an expectation that they're you know, doing a certain

0:45:40.920 --> 0:45:43.560
<v Speaker 4>number of hours in order to do the work for

0:45:43.600 --> 0:45:46.000
<v Speaker 4>the firm. But you know, what we should be rewarding

0:45:46.160 --> 0:45:48.879
<v Speaker 4>is the quality of the work itself. And I think

0:45:48.920 --> 0:45:51.640
<v Speaker 4>that can be extended to so many other fields. The

0:45:51.680 --> 0:45:55.960
<v Speaker 4>thing I always advise people for outside of the office

0:45:56.360 --> 0:45:58.520
<v Speaker 4>is you know, I talked a little bit about doing

0:45:58.560 --> 0:46:01.279
<v Speaker 4>things other than work and practice. This means sort of

0:46:01.320 --> 0:46:05.879
<v Speaker 4>like having active forms of leisure. You know, like, if

0:46:05.920 --> 0:46:08.799
<v Speaker 4>you want to conceive of yourself as more than just

0:46:08.880 --> 0:46:12.600
<v Speaker 4>someone who exists on this earth to produce economic value

0:46:12.800 --> 0:46:17.360
<v Speaker 4>or economic returns for a corporation, try and find realms

0:46:17.400 --> 0:46:20.799
<v Speaker 4>of your life where people maybe don't even know what

0:46:20.880 --> 0:46:24.640
<v Speaker 4>you do for work or don't care about your job title.

0:46:24.760 --> 0:46:24.960
<v Speaker 3>You know.

0:46:25.000 --> 0:46:28.640
<v Speaker 4>And this doesn't necessarily have to be taking up knitting

0:46:28.760 --> 0:46:31.560
<v Speaker 4>or a personal hobby. While I do think there is

0:46:31.680 --> 0:46:34.239
<v Speaker 4>value in being able to do something just for the

0:46:34.320 --> 0:46:36.960
<v Speaker 4>joy of it or just for the fun of it.

0:46:36.960 --> 0:46:40.040
<v Speaker 4>It can mean getting involved in your neighborhood or your

0:46:40.080 --> 0:46:44.120
<v Speaker 4>local community. It can mean finding a community of people

0:46:44.239 --> 0:46:48.240
<v Speaker 4>like a sports team or a book club, that your

0:46:48.360 --> 0:46:52.240
<v Speaker 4>value to that community is not tied to your value

0:46:52.640 --> 0:46:55.440
<v Speaker 4>in the office. It's something where you can show up

0:46:55.719 --> 0:46:58.080
<v Speaker 4>in a different realm and start to kind of cultivate

0:46:58.160 --> 0:46:59.600
<v Speaker 4>those different identities.

0:46:59.680 --> 0:46:59.880
<v Speaker 3>You know.

0:47:00.800 --> 0:47:05.160
<v Speaker 4>Just a recent example, I'm Jewish, and there are there's

0:47:05.239 --> 0:47:09.279
<v Speaker 4>like a dormant Jewish identity somewhere deep inside of me.

0:47:09.440 --> 0:47:13.160
<v Speaker 4>I'm not very not a very active Jew. But you know,

0:47:13.280 --> 0:47:16.160
<v Speaker 4>recently it was Passover and you know, I sat around

0:47:16.200 --> 0:47:19.719
<v Speaker 4>the table with my family and we participated in some

0:47:19.760 --> 0:47:23.160
<v Speaker 4>of the traditions of the religion. And it was through

0:47:23.719 --> 0:47:26.880
<v Speaker 4>that behavior, it was through that activity of actively doing

0:47:26.960 --> 0:47:31.120
<v Speaker 4>something related to Judaism that I felt my identity as

0:47:31.120 --> 0:47:33.440
<v Speaker 4>a Jewish person began to grow. And so you can

0:47:33.440 --> 0:47:36.000
<v Speaker 4>think about that in any realm of your life, whether

0:47:36.080 --> 0:47:40.759
<v Speaker 4>you're a craft beer aficionado, that identity will grow if

0:47:40.800 --> 0:47:43.319
<v Speaker 4>you are actively taking time to learn more about the

0:47:43.360 --> 0:47:45.480
<v Speaker 4>craft beers, are going out drinking with friends.

0:47:46.080 --> 0:47:48.120
<v Speaker 3>Just don't let it grow too much. Tay sober out there, folks.

0:47:48.280 --> 0:47:52.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, but absolutely, well, Simo, this has been an awesome conversation.

0:47:53.160 --> 0:47:55.279
<v Speaker 2>We really appreciate you taking a time to just talk

0:47:55.280 --> 0:47:58.040
<v Speaker 2>to us about finding that balance. Where is it that

0:47:58.080 --> 0:48:00.640
<v Speaker 2>folks can learn more about you and specific where they

0:48:00.680 --> 0:48:02.040
<v Speaker 2>can find your book?

0:48:02.560 --> 0:48:04.879
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, the best place to go is the good Enough

0:48:05.040 --> 0:48:08.520
<v Speaker 4>job dot com. And this is my first book and

0:48:08.600 --> 0:48:12.400
<v Speaker 4>so every order or pre order really makes a big difference,

0:48:12.840 --> 0:48:15.279
<v Speaker 4>and there you can find all of my socials and

0:48:15.320 --> 0:48:16.640
<v Speaker 4>other information that you might need.

0:48:17.160 --> 0:48:19.880
<v Speaker 2>Awesome. Well, thank you again for joining us here on

0:48:19.960 --> 0:48:21.120
<v Speaker 2>the podcast, Eemo.

0:48:21.120 --> 0:48:23.480
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for having me all right, Matt gotta love that

0:48:23.520 --> 0:48:27.360
<v Speaker 1>conversation with Simone. I feel like there is like so

0:48:27.480 --> 0:48:28.920
<v Speaker 1>much of what he has written about and what he

0:48:28.960 --> 0:48:32.320
<v Speaker 1>talks about we've talked about in different ways over the years, exactly,

0:48:32.360 --> 0:48:35.200
<v Speaker 1>not with the eloquence or the precision.

0:48:35.239 --> 0:48:37.680
<v Speaker 2>We certainly have not written a book on it. I mean,

0:48:37.719 --> 0:48:39.719
<v Speaker 2>it's just one of the reasons I mean that we

0:48:39.719 --> 0:48:42.440
<v Speaker 2>wanted to have him on because the message that he

0:48:42.600 --> 0:48:46.040
<v Speaker 2>has it's so important, and honestly, the more ways that

0:48:46.080 --> 0:48:47.680
<v Speaker 2>you can talk about it, like the different angles that

0:48:47.719 --> 0:48:49.920
<v Speaker 2>you can take to the same end goal, well, if

0:48:49.920 --> 0:48:52.240
<v Speaker 2>that helps others to find that balance and to find

0:48:52.360 --> 0:48:55.719
<v Speaker 2>that fulfillment and happiness in life, we are all for

0:48:55.760 --> 0:48:56.359
<v Speaker 2>it for sure.

0:48:56.360 --> 0:48:58.240
<v Speaker 3>All right. So what was your big takeaway from this combo?

0:48:58.440 --> 0:49:00.600
<v Speaker 1>Was it that we should all be more chocolate cookies,

0:49:00.880 --> 0:49:02.680
<v Speaker 1>preferably with a little bit of sea salt, That a

0:49:02.680 --> 0:49:04.279
<v Speaker 1>little bit of sea salt really makes them stand down?

0:49:04.320 --> 0:49:06.560
<v Speaker 2>I think I thought you made Yeah. Personally, I like

0:49:06.760 --> 0:49:08.680
<v Speaker 2>a touch of oatmeal in there as well, just say

0:49:08.760 --> 0:49:10.960
<v Speaker 2>it adds a little bit of chew, just not raisins.

0:49:11.040 --> 0:49:12.080
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's not raisins.

0:49:13.320 --> 0:49:16.000
<v Speaker 2>You hate on raisins there, Okay, So I think my

0:49:16.000 --> 0:49:18.440
<v Speaker 2>big takeaway is that so many of the things, so

0:49:18.440 --> 0:49:20.520
<v Speaker 2>many of the problems in the different myths that he

0:49:20.560 --> 0:49:23.560
<v Speaker 2>addresses in the book. It's not that they are something

0:49:23.600 --> 0:49:26.000
<v Speaker 2>we should completely avoid, but it's just that we are

0:49:26.040 --> 0:49:29.279
<v Speaker 2>relying on our job to meet those ends more than

0:49:29.320 --> 0:49:31.440
<v Speaker 2>we should. Uh So, for instance, when it comes to

0:49:32.120 --> 0:49:34.640
<v Speaker 2>the job you do, should you be passionate about it? Well,

0:49:34.680 --> 0:49:37.640
<v Speaker 2>maybe we should be less focused on the passion side

0:49:37.640 --> 0:49:40.319
<v Speaker 2>of things and instead, first and foremost, like he said,

0:49:40.440 --> 0:49:43.120
<v Speaker 2>we should be thinking about it like an economic contract. Yes,

0:49:43.960 --> 0:49:46.359
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to exchange my time and my talents for

0:49:46.440 --> 0:49:46.960
<v Speaker 2>a paycheck.

0:49:47.000 --> 0:49:48.799
<v Speaker 3>And if you like the job, that's great to be

0:49:48.840 --> 0:49:49.800
<v Speaker 3>on top exactly.

0:49:49.960 --> 0:49:51.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, And how maybe we shouldn't be looking to our

0:49:52.000 --> 0:49:55.880
<v Speaker 2>jobs to find that interpersonal relationship and to the extent

0:49:55.880 --> 0:49:57.880
<v Speaker 2>that we even think of our coworkers as family, but

0:49:57.920 --> 0:50:01.879
<v Speaker 2>instead we should maybe maintain a degre of professionalism. And

0:50:02.120 --> 0:50:03.960
<v Speaker 2>if we think about it from maybe more of that

0:50:04.040 --> 0:50:08.040
<v Speaker 2>transactional framework, Like within that framework, I think it could

0:50:08.080 --> 0:50:10.600
<v Speaker 2>be healthier because honestly, I feel like it kind of

0:50:10.600 --> 0:50:12.279
<v Speaker 2>goes counter to what a lot of folks are saying,

0:50:12.280 --> 0:50:13.719
<v Speaker 2>where they're just like, oh, no, no, no, you know,

0:50:13.880 --> 0:50:16.439
<v Speaker 2>like the whole if you're an employee here, we treat

0:50:16.440 --> 0:50:17.399
<v Speaker 2>you like family.

0:50:17.080 --> 0:50:19.040
<v Speaker 1>And like that whole approach but it benefits from that

0:50:19.040 --> 0:50:20.919
<v Speaker 1>relationship typically the employer, yeah, not you.

0:50:21.320 --> 0:50:24.359
<v Speaker 2>And it leaves the employee in an unhealthy position once

0:50:24.440 --> 0:50:26.680
<v Speaker 2>you get fired or once you leave that job and

0:50:26.719 --> 0:50:28.879
<v Speaker 2>you're trying to and you're rudderless, you're trying to figure

0:50:28.920 --> 0:50:29.839
<v Speaker 2>out what you're going to do next.

0:50:29.840 --> 0:50:30.760
<v Speaker 3>But I thought we were family.

0:50:30.960 --> 0:50:33.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah exactly. Yeah, So I just I don't know. It's

0:50:33.560 --> 0:50:37.520
<v Speaker 2>interesting to hear someone take an approach towards your work,

0:50:37.560 --> 0:50:41.759
<v Speaker 2>towards your career that d emphasizes the like the interpersonal

0:50:41.880 --> 0:50:43.680
<v Speaker 2>side of things. It's it's sort of like it's a

0:50:43.680 --> 0:50:46.080
<v Speaker 2>way that he is finding himself in the middle because

0:50:46.120 --> 0:50:49.560
<v Speaker 2>he's not going to the far extreme and saying that like, oh, yeah,

0:50:49.600 --> 0:50:51.759
<v Speaker 2>we should all be completely disenchanted with our job. We

0:50:51.760 --> 0:50:54.000
<v Speaker 2>should only be thinking about it as a contract.

0:50:54.080 --> 0:50:56.120
<v Speaker 3>But or that you should only do the bare minimum either,

0:50:56.239 --> 0:50:57.479
<v Speaker 3>right exactly. Yeah. Yeah.

0:50:57.520 --> 0:51:00.440
<v Speaker 2>So there's a way to find fulfilling work, and there's

0:51:00.440 --> 0:51:02.879
<v Speaker 2>also a way to find work that's going to pay

0:51:02.920 --> 0:51:05.319
<v Speaker 2>you well, but you don't necessarily have to sell your

0:51:05.320 --> 0:51:07.640
<v Speaker 2>soul in order to achieve that on either end of

0:51:07.640 --> 0:51:08.120
<v Speaker 2>the spectrum.

0:51:08.160 --> 0:51:09.680
<v Speaker 3>Yep, No, I think it's a good way to put it.

0:51:09.840 --> 0:51:10.799
<v Speaker 3>My big take about you though.

0:51:10.840 --> 0:51:14.239
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, when he said all of our identities need investments,

0:51:14.400 --> 0:51:16.680
<v Speaker 1>I thought that was great. And he basically talked about

0:51:16.880 --> 0:51:20.640
<v Speaker 1>how they're similar to houseplants, and my thought was, Man,

0:51:20.719 --> 0:51:22.719
<v Speaker 1>a lot of our houseplants, at least in my house,

0:51:22.719 --> 0:51:25.200
<v Speaker 1>are parched, like we're not doing a good enough job

0:51:25.200 --> 0:51:26.520
<v Speaker 1>with them. And I think the same is true for

0:51:26.560 --> 0:51:29.439
<v Speaker 1>a lot of our identities different areas in our life. Yeah,

0:51:29.480 --> 0:51:32.600
<v Speaker 1>like when it comes to spouse, when it comes to parent,

0:51:33.080 --> 0:51:35.440
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to community involvement. We talked about that

0:51:35.440 --> 0:51:37.839
<v Speaker 1>Wall Street journal. I can't get that out of my head,

0:51:38.120 --> 0:51:41.600
<v Speaker 1>just that poll about how people value money more than

0:51:41.640 --> 0:51:43.759
<v Speaker 1>they value community, more than they value patriotism, or than

0:51:43.760 --> 0:51:46.680
<v Speaker 1>they value family these days. It speaks so much about

0:51:46.680 --> 0:51:48.440
<v Speaker 1>where we're at as a culture. I think we value

0:51:48.440 --> 0:51:50.560
<v Speaker 1>our careers way more than we value a lot of

0:51:50.560 --> 0:51:53.400
<v Speaker 1>those things too, because our careers are so tied to money,

0:51:53.560 --> 0:51:55.640
<v Speaker 1>and that is a shame. And so we need to

0:51:56.120 --> 0:51:58.800
<v Speaker 1>start to think about how we can start watering, start pruning,

0:51:58.840 --> 0:52:02.480
<v Speaker 1>start taking care of those other identity forming factors in

0:52:02.520 --> 0:52:05.919
<v Speaker 1>our lives, like hobbies, like interpersonal relationships. And I think

0:52:06.000 --> 0:52:08.719
<v Speaker 1>that will in all likelihood mean putting a little bit

0:52:08.800 --> 0:52:11.200
<v Speaker 1>less into work and career, and I think we'll be

0:52:11.200 --> 0:52:13.880
<v Speaker 1>happier for it. So I guess is this where I

0:52:13.880 --> 0:52:17.880
<v Speaker 1>put in my two weeks Notice, Matt, sure, yeah, just kidding.

0:52:18.280 --> 0:52:20.479
<v Speaker 3>But now we are more how to money for folks.

0:52:20.560 --> 0:52:22.520
<v Speaker 3>We try not to overdo it and and that.

0:52:22.560 --> 0:52:23.960
<v Speaker 2>Is all about finding that balance.

0:52:24.000 --> 0:52:25.319
<v Speaker 1>Part of the reason we love it because we're not

0:52:25.320 --> 0:52:27.560
<v Speaker 1>working sixty hours a week doing it. But Matt, let's

0:52:27.560 --> 0:52:29.680
<v Speaker 1>go back to the beer that we had on this episode.

0:52:29.719 --> 0:52:31.279
<v Speaker 1>This is a beer I picked up when I was

0:52:31.280 --> 0:52:33.680
<v Speaker 1>out on the West Coast. It's Ye scrap Alicious by

0:52:33.719 --> 0:52:35.040
<v Speaker 1>Los Angeles Aleworks.

0:52:35.239 --> 0:52:37.480
<v Speaker 3>What are your thoughts on this ipa? The whole scrap

0:52:37.480 --> 0:52:37.960
<v Speaker 3>Alicious thing?

0:52:38.040 --> 0:52:38.959
<v Speaker 2>Is that the name of this cat?

0:52:39.280 --> 0:52:41.399
<v Speaker 3>I think so? Is it like a brewery cat?

0:52:41.440 --> 0:52:43.120
<v Speaker 2>I think it makes me think about when we were

0:52:43.160 --> 0:52:46.279
<v Speaker 2>in Kentucky and we went to Peerless Distillery. They had

0:52:46.280 --> 0:52:50.920
<v Speaker 2>a distillery cat that's right, that hung around there in

0:52:50.960 --> 0:52:53.360
<v Speaker 2>the gift shop. But yeah, man, this was a fantastic

0:52:53.960 --> 0:52:57.360
<v Speaker 2>juicy ipa, as it's written here on the label. Just

0:52:57.360 --> 0:53:01.840
<v Speaker 2>like our conversation with Simone, it strikes the balance between

0:53:01.960 --> 0:53:05.280
<v Speaker 2>being incredibly juicy and having the right amount of sweetness,

0:53:05.280 --> 0:53:07.839
<v Speaker 2>but at the same time, it's got like that sharpness,

0:53:08.280 --> 0:53:10.799
<v Speaker 2>the bitterness that you get from the Hops. It It's

0:53:10.800 --> 0:53:13.080
<v Speaker 2>been a minute since I've said blue cheese as I've

0:53:13.080 --> 0:53:14.920
<v Speaker 2>described an IPA, but this one kind of had some

0:53:14.920 --> 0:53:17.399
<v Speaker 2>of those sharp blue cheese elements, and when you're able

0:53:17.440 --> 0:53:19.799
<v Speaker 2>to strike that perfect balance between the two, you end

0:53:19.880 --> 0:53:21.439
<v Speaker 2>up with an amazing beer.

0:53:21.520 --> 0:53:23.879
<v Speaker 1>I feel like when you describe an IPA, you don't

0:53:23.920 --> 0:53:27.120
<v Speaker 1>typically want to describe it as funky, but occasionally there

0:53:27.160 --> 0:53:28.080
<v Speaker 1>is an IPA.

0:53:28.040 --> 0:53:29.440
<v Speaker 3>And blue cheese is funky.

0:53:29.520 --> 0:53:31.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and you can call it funky and it's a

0:53:31.040 --> 0:53:33.359
<v Speaker 1>good thing. Sometimes if it's funky, it means that it's

0:53:33.560 --> 0:53:35.719
<v Speaker 1>as a bad thing. Yeah, it's like, oh no, this

0:53:35.760 --> 0:53:37.960
<v Speaker 1>is a shelfterd. This was on the shelf from a

0:53:38.000 --> 0:53:39.840
<v Speaker 1>year or two, and so it kind of tastes a

0:53:39.840 --> 0:53:42.480
<v Speaker 1>little funky, but this is like, no, no, no. The

0:53:42.520 --> 0:53:45.200
<v Speaker 1>Hops bring a level of yeah that just some kind

0:53:45.200 --> 0:53:48.000
<v Speaker 1>of unique notes from from the Hop set that they

0:53:48.000 --> 0:53:50.360
<v Speaker 1>put into this IPA, And so I like it. It

0:53:50.400 --> 0:53:54.359
<v Speaker 1>was juicy, a little funky, and overall good vibes from

0:53:54.360 --> 0:53:54.600
<v Speaker 1>this one.

0:53:54.680 --> 0:53:54.839
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:53:54.840 --> 0:53:57.600
<v Speaker 2>Specifically, if you're really into the Hops, it's got I've

0:53:57.600 --> 0:53:59.799
<v Speaker 2>never even heard of these first two hops brew one

0:54:00.239 --> 0:54:04.160
<v Speaker 2>Loral and then Sabro. Yeah, I've seen those hops on

0:54:04.200 --> 0:54:06.239
<v Speaker 2>labels it before, but not this first two. So so

0:54:06.239 --> 0:54:08.120
<v Speaker 2>many hot varieties now, it's ridiculous. You know, you just

0:54:08.160 --> 0:54:10.000
<v Speaker 2>gotta go down there one of these days. You want

0:54:10.040 --> 0:54:12.080
<v Speaker 2>to go to a hot farm down to New Zealand.

0:54:12.239 --> 0:54:14.960
<v Speaker 3>Uh, yeah, that sounds pretty cool. Field trip.

0:54:16.239 --> 0:54:19.120
<v Speaker 2>Maybe in like five ten years. But yeah, enough about

0:54:19.120 --> 0:54:21.800
<v Speaker 2>the beer. Be sure to look out for Simone's book.

0:54:22.200 --> 0:54:24.200
<v Speaker 2>It's set to be published here in a couple of weeks.

0:54:24.360 --> 0:54:27.680
<v Speaker 2>I found it to be incredibly thought provoking and hopefully

0:54:27.719 --> 0:54:29.560
<v Speaker 2>I wonder if this is one of his goals.

0:54:29.600 --> 0:54:30.759
<v Speaker 3>But just for you to be able to.

0:54:30.760 --> 0:54:33.840
<v Speaker 2>Ask yourself a bunch of different questions as you process

0:54:33.880 --> 0:54:36.080
<v Speaker 2>and do the hard work of figuring out what it

0:54:36.200 --> 0:54:38.520
<v Speaker 2>is that you're looking for, not just in your statement,

0:54:38.640 --> 0:54:40.799
<v Speaker 2>yeah exactly, not just in your job, but honestly just

0:54:40.800 --> 0:54:44.120
<v Speaker 2>in life overall. But we'll make sure to have links

0:54:44.200 --> 0:54:46.480
<v Speaker 2>up on the website at how Tomoney dot com and Buddy,

0:54:46.480 --> 0:54:48.520
<v Speaker 2>that's going to be it for this episode until next time.

0:54:48.640 --> 0:54:50.640
<v Speaker 3>Best Friends Out, Best Friends Out.

0:55:00.280 --> 0:55:02.160
<v Speaker 4>He don't hope