WEBVTT - The David Herbert Collection

0:00:01.240 --> 0:00:06.400
<v Speaker 1>I have to say that when I learned that this

0:00:06.519 --> 0:00:12.760
<v Speaker 1>was one person, I was a little flabbergasted. I really was,

0:00:13.200 --> 0:00:18.000
<v Speaker 1>because these artists, yes, they're all around the same period,

0:00:18.800 --> 0:00:22.120
<v Speaker 1>but their styles are very, very different, and he did

0:00:22.160 --> 0:00:26.200
<v Speaker 1>a good job. I mean, there are other fakes in

0:00:26.680 --> 0:00:29.040
<v Speaker 1>art history, and as I used to like to joke

0:00:29.080 --> 0:00:31.720
<v Speaker 1>when I gave talks, the best fakes are still hanging

0:00:31.720 --> 0:00:34.760
<v Speaker 1>on people's walls. You know, they don't even know or

0:00:34.840 --> 0:00:41.880
<v Speaker 1>suspect that they're fakes. By two thousand two, an unlikely

0:00:42.000 --> 0:00:45.839
<v Speaker 1>trio of con artists had grown rich from their forgery

0:00:45.920 --> 0:00:52.520
<v Speaker 1>Schemepra Rosalez had worked her charms and unearthed a dazzling

0:00:52.600 --> 0:00:56.920
<v Speaker 1>collection of abstract Expressionist paintings destined for Ann Friedman to

0:00:56.960 --> 0:01:02.400
<v Speaker 1>acquire for the Knodler Gallery, and convinced herself that the

0:01:02.440 --> 0:01:06.319
<v Speaker 1>works were genuine. She was desperate to squeeze every dollar

0:01:06.400 --> 0:01:10.399
<v Speaker 1>of profit she could from the mysterious works works that

0:01:10.520 --> 0:01:15.320
<v Speaker 1>had no provenance. Anne had bought the paintings for unthinkably

0:01:15.400 --> 0:01:19.480
<v Speaker 1>low prices and sold them at sky high markups. The

0:01:19.560 --> 0:01:22.640
<v Speaker 1>profit margin was so high that the Knodler had come

0:01:22.680 --> 0:01:26.280
<v Speaker 1>to rely on the mr X Junior collection for its

0:01:26.400 --> 0:01:33.360
<v Speaker 1>very survival. Meanwhile, the fraudsters were living the American dream.

0:01:33.440 --> 0:01:38.320
<v Speaker 1>Carlos Bergantinos, the ideas man, patient, Kuon the artist, and

0:01:38.640 --> 0:01:43.480
<v Speaker 1>Glepara Rosalez, the resourceful salesperson, had executed a scheme that

0:01:43.600 --> 0:01:49.400
<v Speaker 1>was paying enormous dividends. Along with rising profits, however, came

0:01:49.480 --> 0:01:53.560
<v Speaker 1>increased risk. By two thousand two, Jack and Fan Levy

0:01:53.600 --> 0:01:57.320
<v Speaker 1>had spent upwards a four point three million dollars acquiring

0:01:57.400 --> 0:02:01.680
<v Speaker 1>master works from Knodler. The biggest prize was a two

0:02:01.720 --> 0:02:07.680
<v Speaker 1>million dollar Jackson pollock, identified simply as untitled nine. It

0:02:07.840 --> 0:02:11.400
<v Speaker 1>had a greenish cast and measured twelve by eighteen inches.

0:02:12.040 --> 0:02:15.160
<v Speaker 1>It was small for a pollock, but impressive all the same.

0:02:16.440 --> 0:02:20.400
<v Speaker 1>Before the sale could be finalized, however, Jack Levy insisted

0:02:20.560 --> 0:02:23.639
<v Speaker 1>that the pollock be vetted by Eye Far the International

0:02:23.720 --> 0:02:28.480
<v Speaker 1>Foundation for Art Research. Up to this point, none of

0:02:28.520 --> 0:02:32.240
<v Speaker 1>the works brought in by Glafira Rosalee had been subjected

0:02:32.280 --> 0:02:38.920
<v Speaker 1>to forensic scrutiny, and Friedman was so convinced of the

0:02:38.960 --> 0:02:43.240
<v Speaker 1>works authenticity that she readily agreed to the Leavi's terms.

0:02:44.639 --> 0:02:49.119
<v Speaker 1>The work was already owned by Jack Leavy, so Noodler

0:02:49.320 --> 0:02:53.560
<v Speaker 1>was not quote the client or the person who submitted

0:02:53.560 --> 0:02:56.960
<v Speaker 1>the work to eye FAR. There's a lot of misunderstanding

0:02:57.000 --> 0:03:00.640
<v Speaker 1>in the field about that. I am share and flesher.

0:03:00.919 --> 0:03:05.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm executive director of the International Foundation for Art Research,

0:03:05.800 --> 0:03:11.359
<v Speaker 1>which is much better known under the acronym FAR. I

0:03:11.560 --> 0:03:15.920
<v Speaker 1>FAR as experts provide a thorough and impartial analysis of

0:03:16.040 --> 0:03:20.360
<v Speaker 1>visual works of art through profnance research and forensic testing.

0:03:20.840 --> 0:03:23.720
<v Speaker 1>I FAR is also well known for their pioneering work

0:03:23.760 --> 0:03:28.200
<v Speaker 1>and art theft, having created the first database of stolen art.

0:03:29.760 --> 0:03:32.480
<v Speaker 1>I spoke with Sharon in her corner office overlooking the

0:03:32.520 --> 0:03:35.840
<v Speaker 1>New York Public Library. I FAR, now a fifty year

0:03:35.880 --> 0:03:39.760
<v Speaker 1>old institution, works with researchers and forensics experts to help

0:03:39.760 --> 0:03:43.960
<v Speaker 1>authenticate artwork submitted from all over the world. Jack Levy

0:03:44.040 --> 0:03:46.760
<v Speaker 1>purchased his pollock from the Knodler with no inkling that

0:03:46.840 --> 0:03:49.640
<v Speaker 1>it might be fake. Signing up for an eye FAR

0:03:49.800 --> 0:03:53.040
<v Speaker 1>analysis was a mere legal nicety, or so he thought.

0:03:53.520 --> 0:03:56.600
<v Speaker 1>Despite the many pollocks that came through I FAR. Sharon

0:03:56.640 --> 0:03:59.160
<v Speaker 1>too had no doubts that the Levy pollock would prove

0:03:59.200 --> 0:04:03.880
<v Speaker 1>to be right maas initial assumption was, of course, this

0:04:03.880 --> 0:04:06.520
<v Speaker 1>would be great. We're going to find a new pollock,

0:04:07.040 --> 0:04:10.400
<v Speaker 1>because it would never entered my mind that a work

0:04:10.480 --> 0:04:15.080
<v Speaker 1>that wouldn't be good would have been sold through the

0:04:15.160 --> 0:04:19.479
<v Speaker 1>Ndler galery. Sharon was unaware of the deal Jack Levy

0:04:19.520 --> 0:04:22.480
<v Speaker 1>had struck with Ann Friedman and Nodler, but to her,

0:04:22.839 --> 0:04:25.440
<v Speaker 1>having the sale of the Pollock be contingent upon I

0:04:25.640 --> 0:04:30.240
<v Speaker 1>far determination of authenticity made a lot of sense. My

0:04:30.480 --> 0:04:35.440
<v Speaker 1>logic said to me that someone who purchases a seventh

0:04:35.440 --> 0:04:40.599
<v Speaker 1>figure work from a reputable gallery, if the work turns

0:04:40.640 --> 0:04:44.720
<v Speaker 1>out not to be what that person hopes and expects

0:04:44.760 --> 0:04:47.359
<v Speaker 1>it to be, that they will turn right around to

0:04:47.440 --> 0:04:50.760
<v Speaker 1>the gallery and try to get their money back. Usually,

0:04:50.880 --> 0:04:53.240
<v Speaker 1>when a buyer asks a gallery for their money back,

0:04:53.680 --> 0:04:56.240
<v Speaker 1>the gallery writes them a check instantly as a matter

0:04:56.279 --> 0:05:00.640
<v Speaker 1>of course. Reputations, after all, are at stake. But what

0:05:00.760 --> 0:05:04.479
<v Speaker 1>if the gallery insists the painting Israel and refuses to

0:05:04.480 --> 0:05:07.679
<v Speaker 1>give the buyer their money back. Acting on her gut,

0:05:08.120 --> 0:05:11.240
<v Speaker 1>Sharon took an extra measure to protect herself and I

0:05:11.400 --> 0:05:17.080
<v Speaker 1>far I insisted that the node Le gallery sign an agreement,

0:05:18.040 --> 0:05:22.960
<v Speaker 1>saying they would not sue because there would be nothing

0:05:23.040 --> 0:05:27.039
<v Speaker 1>protecting us. Because if we didn't come up with the

0:05:27.080 --> 0:05:30.479
<v Speaker 1>positive review I assumed we would. I could just see

0:05:30.520 --> 0:05:34.360
<v Speaker 1>exactly what would happen. It would be returned, He'd get

0:05:34.360 --> 0:05:37.360
<v Speaker 1>the money back, and then the gallery would say, well,

0:05:37.960 --> 0:05:41.680
<v Speaker 1>how can you prove that it's not you're defaming our name,

0:05:41.760 --> 0:05:45.120
<v Speaker 1>our character or whatever. It was just a vision I had,

0:05:46.520 --> 0:05:49.640
<v Speaker 1>and so I insisted that they signed something, and they did.

0:05:51.320 --> 0:05:53.839
<v Speaker 1>I Far began working on the Leavey Pollock using the

0:05:53.880 --> 0:05:58.160
<v Speaker 1>same methods they would apply to any painting submitted for authenticity.

0:05:58.760 --> 0:06:01.760
<v Speaker 1>There are some steps that are consistent for every painting,

0:06:01.800 --> 0:06:04.880
<v Speaker 1>and then each project takes on a slight life of

0:06:04.920 --> 0:06:09.839
<v Speaker 1>its own. So we are very committed in general to

0:06:10.680 --> 0:06:13.920
<v Speaker 1>what I like to think of as a three pronged process,

0:06:13.960 --> 0:06:19.800
<v Speaker 1>which is scholarly research, connoisseurship, the expert eyes. We had

0:06:19.800 --> 0:06:22.960
<v Speaker 1>actually quite a few specialists who examined this work, in

0:06:23.000 --> 0:06:27.240
<v Speaker 1>some cases more than once, and the physical properties of

0:06:27.279 --> 0:06:34.320
<v Speaker 1>the work, which sometimes includes a detailed lab examination forensic examination.

0:06:35.920 --> 0:06:39.359
<v Speaker 1>Right away, the scholarly research aspect of I Far work

0:06:39.920 --> 0:06:43.120
<v Speaker 1>turned up red flags for starters. The paintings lack of

0:06:43.160 --> 0:06:47.960
<v Speaker 1>provenance was a problem for Sharon. We were sent the

0:06:48.000 --> 0:06:53.280
<v Speaker 1>skimpiest possible provenance information that one can be sent for

0:06:53.320 --> 0:06:56.800
<v Speaker 1>a work that is of a major artist, and of

0:06:56.839 --> 0:07:02.520
<v Speaker 1>seven figure value essentially enough. And I actually personally called

0:07:02.640 --> 0:07:06.920
<v Speaker 1>Anne I knew an and cultured to give them the

0:07:06.920 --> 0:07:10.520
<v Speaker 1>benefit of the doubt, saying, we can be more helpful

0:07:10.640 --> 0:07:15.200
<v Speaker 1>on this project if you supply more information to us.

0:07:16.240 --> 0:07:20.480
<v Speaker 1>And at that time she actually said, you're researching the provenance,

0:07:21.840 --> 0:07:26.800
<v Speaker 1>as I said, of course, we always researched the provenance.

0:07:27.080 --> 0:07:29.200
<v Speaker 1>What did you think? And she said, I thought you

0:07:29.240 --> 0:07:32.520
<v Speaker 1>would just bring experts together to look at the work

0:07:32.520 --> 0:07:34.680
<v Speaker 1>and say whether it's good. I said, we're doing that

0:07:34.760 --> 0:07:43.360
<v Speaker 1>as well, But of course we research the provenance and

0:07:43.800 --> 0:07:47.240
<v Speaker 1>was in a predicament I far as work was thorough

0:07:47.640 --> 0:07:51.240
<v Speaker 1>and consistent. And because Jack Levy had officially submitted the

0:07:51.280 --> 0:07:54.600
<v Speaker 1>work to I Far not Nodler, there was nothing Anne

0:07:54.600 --> 0:07:57.400
<v Speaker 1>could do to finesse her way out of the problem.

0:07:57.480 --> 0:08:01.800
<v Speaker 1>Sitting on Sharon's desk, a deeper I Far dug into

0:08:01.840 --> 0:08:04.640
<v Speaker 1>the history of the Levy Pollock the more nervous and

0:08:04.880 --> 0:08:09.320
<v Speaker 1>seemed to become for Sharon. The backstory just wasn't adding up.

0:08:10.160 --> 0:08:13.320
<v Speaker 1>It was just simply said and relayed to us. It

0:08:13.400 --> 0:08:18.560
<v Speaker 1>was acquired through Osario. This was it. The Osorio story

0:08:18.800 --> 0:08:21.880
<v Speaker 1>conjured up by gap Rozalice had now made its way

0:08:21.880 --> 0:08:26.560
<v Speaker 1>through Ann Friedman to Sharon and I Far. Alfonso Osario

0:08:26.640 --> 0:08:30.480
<v Speaker 1>had died, but his longtime partner ted Dragon was still alive.

0:08:31.520 --> 0:08:35.280
<v Speaker 1>So I contacted Dragon simply to find out, after he

0:08:35.400 --> 0:08:39.720
<v Speaker 1>lived with Osario from many years, could he provide information?

0:08:40.280 --> 0:08:43.360
<v Speaker 1>Is he familiar with this work, is he aware of

0:08:43.800 --> 0:08:48.360
<v Speaker 1>Osorio ever having dealt with it? And what was Ted

0:08:48.480 --> 0:08:52.240
<v Speaker 1>Dragon's reaction? He had never seen the work. He didn't

0:08:52.240 --> 0:08:56.800
<v Speaker 1>think there was any connection whatsoever to Osario because had

0:08:56.840 --> 0:09:02.560
<v Speaker 1>there been, given his in amit relationship with Osario over

0:09:02.679 --> 0:09:06.920
<v Speaker 1>so many years and particularly at that period, that he

0:09:07.000 --> 0:09:11.120
<v Speaker 1>would have known if there was a connection. And we

0:09:11.240 --> 0:09:14.280
<v Speaker 1>did other research as well, and we could find nothing

0:09:14.360 --> 0:09:22.000
<v Speaker 1>to substantiate the Osorio connection. The Osorio provenance was crumbling

0:09:22.080 --> 0:09:25.440
<v Speaker 1>under scrutiny from I Far. The whole notion of Osorio

0:09:25.640 --> 0:09:28.960
<v Speaker 1>serving as a middleman between dealers and artists went nowhere.

0:09:29.760 --> 0:09:34.320
<v Speaker 1>But what about the painting itself. This particular work was

0:09:34.400 --> 0:09:37.680
<v Speaker 1>canvas mountain on masonite, which is a type of fiberboard.

0:09:38.080 --> 0:09:42.640
<v Speaker 1>Paula did have canvases mounted on masonite. In this case

0:09:43.000 --> 0:09:47.439
<v Speaker 1>it was mounted on the rough side of the masonite.

0:09:47.520 --> 0:09:50.680
<v Speaker 1>Most of the ones of his that were mounted were

0:09:50.800 --> 0:09:54.600
<v Speaker 1>mounted on the smooth side of the masonite, but he

0:09:54.679 --> 0:09:59.320
<v Speaker 1>also painted directly on masonite. I can't tell you that

0:09:59.720 --> 0:10:05.640
<v Speaker 1>one of the specialists to examine this work immediately was upset.

0:10:06.640 --> 0:10:09.560
<v Speaker 1>They felt that it was mounted on that mason I

0:10:09.720 --> 0:10:13.600
<v Speaker 1>just so that we couldn't see the back of the canvas.

0:10:13.640 --> 0:10:15.960
<v Speaker 1>That's why they're doing it, you know, to hide this.

0:10:16.760 --> 0:10:20.480
<v Speaker 1>I put here on the cover of a detail of

0:10:20.559 --> 0:10:24.240
<v Speaker 1>the painting. Sharon was showing me the cover of one

0:10:24.280 --> 0:10:29.440
<v Speaker 1>of I Far's publications from two thousand sixteen, titled Hindsight

0:10:29.880 --> 0:10:33.800
<v Speaker 1>Lessons from the Noler Rosalee Affair. On the cover are

0:10:33.800 --> 0:10:38.320
<v Speaker 1>two rectangular photos of Jackson Pollock's signatures on paintings. Red

0:10:38.480 --> 0:10:41.400
<v Speaker 1>arrows indicate that one is an actual Pollock, the other

0:10:41.440 --> 0:10:44.280
<v Speaker 1>a fake. The photos are zoomed in to show the

0:10:44.320 --> 0:10:48.240
<v Speaker 1>detail of the signature itself and the canvas. Here's the

0:10:48.360 --> 0:10:53.560
<v Speaker 1>signature Jackson Pollock that's signed on that painting, and this

0:10:53.640 --> 0:10:58.200
<v Speaker 1>is the bottom you can see. Here, here's the canvas,

0:10:58.240 --> 0:11:01.760
<v Speaker 1>and here's the mason I when Pollock did it, first

0:11:01.800 --> 0:11:03.480
<v Speaker 1>of all, he did it on the other side of

0:11:03.520 --> 0:11:06.840
<v Speaker 1>the masonite, on the smooth side, and he put some

0:11:06.960 --> 0:11:10.480
<v Speaker 1>sizing on it, and over the fifty year period from

0:11:10.559 --> 0:11:15.400
<v Speaker 1>nine to two thousand, the masonite with his sizing had

0:11:15.520 --> 0:11:21.559
<v Speaker 1>aged and colored completely differently than the masonite in this work.

0:11:21.880 --> 0:11:25.320
<v Speaker 1>How interesting. Wow, So you really had there was maybe

0:11:25.320 --> 0:11:27.320
<v Speaker 1>a first red flag. For sure. It was more than

0:11:27.360 --> 0:11:30.000
<v Speaker 1>the first red flag. We already had some red flags,

0:11:30.400 --> 0:11:34.359
<v Speaker 1>as I said earlier, not just the provenance any connection

0:11:34.559 --> 0:11:38.920
<v Speaker 1>whatsoever to Pollock. Are their photo archives that show this

0:11:39.000 --> 0:11:42.720
<v Speaker 1>work in the background. Are their letters that mentioned a

0:11:42.800 --> 0:11:46.400
<v Speaker 1>work that fits this description? We did all of that.

0:11:49.480 --> 0:11:52.880
<v Speaker 1>These were the kind of telltale details that led I

0:11:53.080 --> 0:11:59.040
<v Speaker 1>far to issue its shocking opinion. We said, we cannot

0:11:59.160 --> 0:12:03.600
<v Speaker 1>accept the work as a work by Jackson Pollock. It

0:12:03.720 --> 0:12:06.559
<v Speaker 1>is the same as saying I'm writing a catalog raison

0:12:06.640 --> 0:12:09.959
<v Speaker 1>A and I'm not including your work in the catalog

0:12:10.040 --> 0:12:15.520
<v Speaker 1>raisin A. We couched our words because we couldn't hammer

0:12:15.640 --> 0:12:21.320
<v Speaker 1>that nail in the coffin. Absolutely, Anne was pretty ticked,

0:12:21.520 --> 0:12:25.720
<v Speaker 1>was she not. Did she not speak publicly and disparage

0:12:25.920 --> 0:12:29.360
<v Speaker 1>and she certainly spoke privately and disparaged us two people,

0:12:29.440 --> 0:12:33.640
<v Speaker 1>because it got back to me all the time years

0:12:33.760 --> 0:12:35.880
<v Speaker 1>later when she felt free to talk about the Leavy

0:12:35.920 --> 0:12:39.080
<v Speaker 1>Pollock and I far As rejection of it, and would

0:12:39.160 --> 0:12:42.120
<v Speaker 1>blithely say, quote, there was a recent history of bad

0:12:42.200 --> 0:12:46.240
<v Speaker 1>feeling between I Far and Knoedler unquote, Hi far As

0:12:46.320 --> 0:12:50.160
<v Speaker 1>experts were biased and implied that was why I Far

0:12:50.400 --> 0:12:53.920
<v Speaker 1>had nixed the painting, where I felt she impugned our

0:12:53.960 --> 0:12:57.520
<v Speaker 1>integrity by saying there was a history of bad feelings,

0:12:57.559 --> 0:13:00.920
<v Speaker 1>therefore she wanted to dismiss what we said. First of all,

0:13:00.960 --> 0:13:04.080
<v Speaker 1>there was no history of bad feelings that I knew of,

0:13:04.760 --> 0:13:07.520
<v Speaker 1>and certainly not during my tenure, and I had already

0:13:07.520 --> 0:13:11.240
<v Speaker 1>been here a few years. But more importantly, to assert

0:13:12.400 --> 0:13:16.320
<v Speaker 1>that even if there were bad feelings, it might change

0:13:16.480 --> 0:13:21.320
<v Speaker 1>our report. I was incredulous that anyone would make such

0:13:21.320 --> 0:13:26.800
<v Speaker 1>a statement, because we only exist because of our good

0:13:26.920 --> 0:13:30.880
<v Speaker 1>name and our reputation for integrity. We're not going to

0:13:30.920 --> 0:13:34.760
<v Speaker 1>assulliate and I'm not going to let anyone else sully it.

0:13:38.800 --> 0:13:42.200
<v Speaker 1>With Far's final judgment on the Levee Pollic in two

0:13:42.280 --> 0:13:47.800
<v Speaker 1>thousand three, and took the painting back very discreetly. She

0:13:47.960 --> 0:13:51.440
<v Speaker 1>returned the two million dollars to Jack Levy contractually, she

0:13:51.520 --> 0:13:55.480
<v Speaker 1>had no choice. Shortly after the sale, was refunded and

0:13:55.720 --> 0:13:59.000
<v Speaker 1>called a Canadian collector, David Mervish, with news that she

0:13:59.120 --> 0:14:03.439
<v Speaker 1>had a wonderful deal for him. Anne was absolutely sure.

0:14:03.640 --> 0:14:06.560
<v Speaker 1>She said that I Far had been wrong and that

0:14:06.640 --> 0:14:10.839
<v Speaker 1>the painting was legitimate to back up her claim, and

0:14:11.280 --> 0:14:15.080
<v Speaker 1>suggested that she herself by a one third interest in

0:14:15.240 --> 0:14:19.640
<v Speaker 1>Untitled nineteen forty nine. The gallery would buy a partial share,

0:14:19.960 --> 0:14:23.280
<v Speaker 1>as would Mervish. Certainly they would sell the painting at

0:14:23.320 --> 0:14:28.640
<v Speaker 1>some point for a fortune. Mervish agreed, and Untitled nineteen

0:14:28.760 --> 0:14:31.960
<v Speaker 1>forty nine was duly put aside for that future day.

0:14:32.480 --> 0:14:37.840
<v Speaker 1>It's I Far status kept quiet, but the damage was done.

0:14:38.400 --> 0:14:41.760
<v Speaker 1>As Anne later said in Vanity Fair, quote, it was

0:14:41.800 --> 0:14:45.960
<v Speaker 1>a backfire because Ted Dragon went crazy. Osorio would never

0:14:46.000 --> 0:14:49.840
<v Speaker 1>have hidden anything from me unquote. That cast a paul

0:14:50.360 --> 0:14:53.720
<v Speaker 1>over the painting and the whole story of Osorio as

0:14:53.760 --> 0:14:58.200
<v Speaker 1>middleman for mister and Missus X. Anne asked Glypha, could

0:14:58.200 --> 0:15:01.240
<v Speaker 1>mister and Missus X have been wrong had they or

0:15:01.280 --> 0:15:06.520
<v Speaker 1>their son confused Osorio with someone else? Glafira promised to

0:15:06.560 --> 0:15:09.360
<v Speaker 1>address the issue and then came back with a change

0:15:09.480 --> 0:15:17.840
<v Speaker 1>in the story more in a minute, As it turned out,

0:15:18.280 --> 0:15:22.240
<v Speaker 1>and was right. Osorio had been in the mix, but

0:15:22.320 --> 0:15:26.760
<v Speaker 1>only marginally, Sofia said. The dealer who had handled most

0:15:26.800 --> 0:15:30.160
<v Speaker 1>of those paintings for Mr and Mrs X was actually

0:15:30.200 --> 0:15:33.960
<v Speaker 1>an art handler named David Herbert. She was so sorry

0:15:34.240 --> 0:15:39.320
<v Speaker 1>for any confusion. This is one of those iffy moments

0:15:39.360 --> 0:15:42.600
<v Speaker 1>in the story where you raised out one but two

0:15:42.600 --> 0:15:46.720
<v Speaker 1>eyebrows and think, wait a minute, how were you not

0:15:46.880 --> 0:15:54.320
<v Speaker 1>suspicious when the entire backstory suddenly shifted. That's author Maria Kannakova. Again.

0:15:55.160 --> 0:15:59.440
<v Speaker 1>It shows a few things the part of the con artists, obviously,

0:15:59.440 --> 0:16:03.800
<v Speaker 1>it shows rate ingenuity and once again listening because Anne

0:16:04.120 --> 0:16:08.040
<v Speaker 1>inadvertently told them what to say, because she said, these

0:16:08.080 --> 0:16:11.080
<v Speaker 1>are the holes, these are the things that people are

0:16:11.120 --> 0:16:15.680
<v Speaker 1>suspicious of. And she even had suggestions, right, maybe was

0:16:15.720 --> 0:16:19.280
<v Speaker 1>it this? Was it that? So she threw out things

0:16:19.320 --> 0:16:23.200
<v Speaker 1>that they could then use. Once again, the con artists here,

0:16:23.360 --> 0:16:26.280
<v Speaker 1>your job is to listen and to figure out, Okay,

0:16:26.320 --> 0:16:30.160
<v Speaker 1>what do I need to change? What are they reacting to,

0:16:30.320 --> 0:16:35.440
<v Speaker 1>what's working, what's not working? David Herbert working wonderful. Let's

0:16:35.480 --> 0:16:38.040
<v Speaker 1>keep him in and try to figure out, you know how,

0:16:38.160 --> 0:16:40.680
<v Speaker 1>how we can change the story to the elements that

0:16:40.680 --> 0:16:44.080
<v Speaker 1>aren't working, to fill in the parts of the narrative

0:16:44.120 --> 0:16:49.480
<v Speaker 1>that are causing us problems. Now, the other element, of course,

0:16:49.640 --> 0:16:51.720
<v Speaker 1>is if you're an how in the world do you

0:16:51.760 --> 0:16:55.680
<v Speaker 1>not see this. One of the things that I've argued

0:16:56.000 --> 0:17:00.360
<v Speaker 1>over and over again is that it's impossible to judge

0:17:00.480 --> 0:17:03.840
<v Speaker 1>from the outside, because from the outside your objective. From

0:17:03.880 --> 0:17:06.000
<v Speaker 1>the inside, once you're already in the middle of it,

0:17:06.080 --> 0:17:10.320
<v Speaker 1>once you're already emotionally involved, your objectivity is gone. It's

0:17:10.440 --> 0:17:14.320
<v Speaker 1>really difficult. It takes a very specific, strong person who

0:17:14.359 --> 0:17:17.880
<v Speaker 1>probably would not have gotten into the situation to begin with,

0:17:18.200 --> 0:17:20.560
<v Speaker 1>to be able to see clearly in the heat of

0:17:20.600 --> 0:17:24.280
<v Speaker 1>the moment, and most people just cannot do that. I

0:17:24.320 --> 0:17:28.000
<v Speaker 1>think that she was already so deep in the con

0:17:28.760 --> 0:17:31.879
<v Speaker 1>that it didn't strike her as weird. It just struck her.

0:17:31.920 --> 0:17:34.960
<v Speaker 1>As we're getting more information, it's on a need to

0:17:35.000 --> 0:17:38.400
<v Speaker 1>know basis, as I need to know more, they tell

0:17:38.440 --> 0:17:41.080
<v Speaker 1>me more. Whereas for us, when we're looking at this,

0:17:41.200 --> 0:17:43.440
<v Speaker 1>we're shaking our heads and thinking, wait, no, no, you're

0:17:43.480 --> 0:17:47.160
<v Speaker 1>not allowed to change the story. If you're and you're thinking, oh, okay,

0:17:47.200 --> 0:17:57.120
<v Speaker 1>that makes sense, great, wonderful. David Herbert, Now, the key

0:17:57.240 --> 0:18:00.840
<v Speaker 1>figure in the back story was a brilliant race He

0:18:00.960 --> 0:18:04.080
<v Speaker 1>was a real person whose modest life and times fit

0:18:04.160 --> 0:18:07.240
<v Speaker 1>the larger story a dealer many in the art world

0:18:07.320 --> 0:18:12.560
<v Speaker 1>had known. Almost certainly, Anne had heard about Herbert through

0:18:12.640 --> 0:18:16.399
<v Speaker 1>Haimi Andrade, since Herbert had been Andrada his best friend

0:18:16.760 --> 0:18:21.960
<v Speaker 1>for decades. Also convenient, David Herbert had died just seven

0:18:22.080 --> 0:18:28.879
<v Speaker 1>years prior. In his executor none other than Heimi Andrade.

0:18:29.359 --> 0:18:34.000
<v Speaker 1>Into Andrade's hands went all of Herbert's files upon his death.

0:18:34.640 --> 0:18:39.000
<v Speaker 1>Possibly those files contained bits that might embellish gafa's story

0:18:39.400 --> 0:18:43.840
<v Speaker 1>of mister and Mrs X. From what Anne now understood,

0:18:43.920 --> 0:18:47.520
<v Speaker 1>David Herbert had been more than a middleman between downtown

0:18:47.680 --> 0:18:51.399
<v Speaker 1>artists and Mr X, setting up sales and taking commissions.

0:18:51.880 --> 0:18:55.560
<v Speaker 1>Herbert had been Mr X's lover during long periods in

0:18:55.560 --> 0:18:59.920
<v Speaker 1>the nineteen fifties in New York. Once again, for Ann,

0:19:00.000 --> 0:19:05.240
<v Speaker 1>and the result was the opportunity to access newly discovered masterpieces.

0:19:07.440 --> 0:19:10.320
<v Speaker 1>One key link between David Herbert and the art world

0:19:10.359 --> 0:19:15.080
<v Speaker 1>he inhabited was the legendary dealer Sydney Janis. After a

0:19:15.160 --> 0:19:18.399
<v Speaker 1>humble start in the garment industry, Janis had made his

0:19:18.440 --> 0:19:22.800
<v Speaker 1>fortune by inventing a two pocket men's Oxford shirt. His

0:19:22.920 --> 0:19:26.879
<v Speaker 1>true passion however, was contemporary art that led him to

0:19:26.880 --> 0:19:30.719
<v Speaker 1>become a dealer, eventually representing many of the mid century greats.

0:19:31.240 --> 0:19:35.040
<v Speaker 1>In eight he opened a fifth floor gallery on Street,

0:19:35.480 --> 0:19:39.440
<v Speaker 1>down the hall from another emerging and important dealer, Betty Parsons.

0:19:40.440 --> 0:19:43.679
<v Speaker 1>Much to parsons indignation, by nineteen fifty two, some of

0:19:43.680 --> 0:19:46.359
<v Speaker 1>her top artists had left her stable and moved down

0:19:46.359 --> 0:19:49.919
<v Speaker 1>the hall to Sydney Janis. She was more of an

0:19:50.040 --> 0:19:54.119
<v Speaker 1>artist than a dealer. She couldn't quite sell any of

0:19:54.240 --> 0:19:58.320
<v Speaker 1>the works of the artist. That was the problem. That's

0:19:58.359 --> 0:20:01.639
<v Speaker 1>Carol Janis, one of Sydney Janis's two sons, who worked

0:20:01.640 --> 0:20:04.520
<v Speaker 1>in the gallery with his father for years. One of

0:20:04.560 --> 0:20:07.040
<v Speaker 1>the artists who came down the hall from Betty Parsons

0:20:07.320 --> 0:20:11.720
<v Speaker 1>was Jackson Pollock. Carol's father liked Pollock's work. He was

0:20:11.760 --> 0:20:15.159
<v Speaker 1>also sympathetic to the struggles that came with being an artist.

0:20:16.000 --> 0:20:21.120
<v Speaker 1>He bought a little painting from him during that year four.

0:20:21.560 --> 0:20:25.760
<v Speaker 1>He told me that he bought it because Pollock was

0:20:25.840 --> 0:20:29.439
<v Speaker 1>so poor that he just felt that he should buy something.

0:20:30.880 --> 0:20:35.399
<v Speaker 1>To Betty Parsons lifelong fury. Pollock would move to the

0:20:35.520 --> 0:20:39.720
<v Speaker 1>Sydney Janis Gallery for the remainder of his career. Mark

0:20:39.800 --> 0:20:43.359
<v Speaker 1>Rothko came down the hole too. After issuing a modest plea,

0:20:43.880 --> 0:20:46.719
<v Speaker 1>he told Sydney Janie that he had to earn seventy

0:20:47.320 --> 0:20:50.440
<v Speaker 1>dollars a year to support his family. Could the Janis

0:20:50.440 --> 0:20:54.160
<v Speaker 1>Gallery promise him that much? Janis thought it was possible.

0:20:55.280 --> 0:20:59.600
<v Speaker 1>In the first year he made fifteen fans and wow,

0:21:00.040 --> 0:21:05.000
<v Speaker 1>he that was big money in nineteen fifty two, over

0:21:06.040 --> 0:21:11.399
<v Speaker 1>thousand dollars. Today, most downtown artists survived on a lot less,

0:21:12.000 --> 0:21:15.159
<v Speaker 1>some so strapped that they sold paintings out of the

0:21:15.160 --> 0:21:18.840
<v Speaker 1>back door, as it were, privately, without the involvement of

0:21:18.880 --> 0:21:23.240
<v Speaker 1>their dealer. That was how David Herbert played into the story.

0:21:25.400 --> 0:21:29.280
<v Speaker 1>Herbert was no figment of Ann Friedman's imagination. He was

0:21:29.320 --> 0:21:32.119
<v Speaker 1>an art insider who, at different times in the nineteen

0:21:32.160 --> 0:21:36.680
<v Speaker 1>fifties worked for both Betty Parsons and Carol's father, Sidney Janice.

0:21:37.000 --> 0:21:42.320
<v Speaker 1>Herbert brought clients to various artists studios, introduced those clients

0:21:42.359 --> 0:21:45.760
<v Speaker 1>to the artists, and handled the occasional back door selling

0:21:45.760 --> 0:21:49.120
<v Speaker 1>of paintings to help them scrape by in tough times.

0:21:49.920 --> 0:21:52.760
<v Speaker 1>He was about five nine. I think he had a

0:21:52.760 --> 0:21:57.280
<v Speaker 1>little mustache. He worked with Betty for a couple of years.

0:21:57.359 --> 0:22:02.080
<v Speaker 1>I suppose partly as ann handler and partly to talk

0:22:02.200 --> 0:22:06.320
<v Speaker 1>the clients coming in. He was not very successful with Penny,

0:22:06.520 --> 0:22:11.040
<v Speaker 1>but Betty came over and somehow take my dad into

0:22:11.040 --> 0:22:13.399
<v Speaker 1>giving him a job, which he did give him. He

0:22:13.640 --> 0:22:17.520
<v Speaker 1>was also gregarious and liked to talk to the clients.

0:22:18.040 --> 0:22:23.000
<v Speaker 1>Everybody started to do was to take clients to artists

0:22:23.080 --> 0:22:27.520
<v Speaker 1>studios and tried to sell them works out of the studios.

0:22:28.680 --> 0:22:32.520
<v Speaker 1>At first, Sydney Jannis didn't mind. It was something he

0:22:32.600 --> 0:22:35.679
<v Speaker 1>was doing and as long as he was doing it

0:22:35.720 --> 0:22:38.840
<v Speaker 1>with any of the hundreds of artists in New York

0:22:39.040 --> 0:22:46.359
<v Speaker 1>who were not with the gallery and didn't say anything. Unfortunately,

0:22:46.840 --> 0:22:49.840
<v Speaker 1>David Herbert's eagerness to help these far flung artists and

0:22:49.960 --> 0:22:52.880
<v Speaker 1>perhaps to profit from them, led to a bad end.

0:22:54.640 --> 0:22:58.439
<v Speaker 1>Carol recalls Herbert handling money for one very important artist

0:22:58.440 --> 0:23:01.719
<v Speaker 1>who was in fact a Jenna artist, Willem de Kooning.

0:23:04.119 --> 0:23:06.560
<v Speaker 1>Gave to then and they asked him for an advance

0:23:06.800 --> 0:23:09.720
<v Speaker 1>for his studio. He had gave him what he asked for,

0:23:09.760 --> 0:23:13.600
<v Speaker 1>fifty dollars, and then the next year he came and

0:23:13.640 --> 0:23:17.320
<v Speaker 1>he asked again for not a fifty and then that

0:23:17.520 --> 0:23:19.920
<v Speaker 1>was quite a lot in those days. They told him no,

0:23:20.119 --> 0:23:24.200
<v Speaker 1>he wouldn't lend into him. So that meant cooning at

0:23:24.280 --> 0:23:28.080
<v Speaker 1>the start, selling out of his studio because he needed

0:23:28.119 --> 0:23:31.760
<v Speaker 1>the money to pay for the gallery. Yeah, and the

0:23:33.400 --> 0:23:36.520
<v Speaker 1>handle that directly because he loved the coon, and the

0:23:36.760 --> 0:23:39.440
<v Speaker 1>ning loves the gallery. And now they were at as

0:23:39.480 --> 0:23:42.600
<v Speaker 1>because he was selling out of his studio but not

0:23:42.760 --> 0:23:47.439
<v Speaker 1>giving the gallery of commission, and David Herbert was in

0:23:47.480 --> 0:23:49.840
<v Speaker 1>the thick of it, paying the cooning for works the

0:23:49.880 --> 0:23:54.000
<v Speaker 1>painter was selling for money he desperately needed. Herbert had

0:23:54.040 --> 0:23:58.040
<v Speaker 1>to go. So one my dad found out about Mattie Well,

0:23:58.080 --> 0:24:03.679
<v Speaker 1>he let him go of imediately. It was easy to

0:24:03.760 --> 0:24:07.080
<v Speaker 1>imagine how Anne Friedman could have believed the story of

0:24:07.480 --> 0:24:10.760
<v Speaker 1>a feckless art handler who bought and sold works on

0:24:10.840 --> 0:24:14.719
<v Speaker 1>his own. By the nineteen seventies and eighties, almost everyone

0:24:14.760 --> 0:24:18.040
<v Speaker 1>in the art world knew of David Herbert. He remained

0:24:18.040 --> 0:24:21.800
<v Speaker 1>a droll character from the same Demi mond As, Alfonso

0:24:21.840 --> 0:24:26.600
<v Speaker 1>Asorio and Jim Andrade. Painter Bill Draper would give two

0:24:26.680 --> 0:24:29.879
<v Speaker 1>day parties, as one dealer says, and Herbert would be

0:24:29.920 --> 0:24:33.399
<v Speaker 1>there along with his dear friends him Andrade and Richard

0:24:33.400 --> 0:24:38.200
<v Speaker 1>brown Baker. There too would be brook Aster, Mayor John Lindsay,

0:24:38.320 --> 0:24:42.480
<v Speaker 1>and art Maven Marian Javits. It was an indulgent and

0:24:42.720 --> 0:24:47.920
<v Speaker 1>freer time. By then, Herbert had begun to struggle. He

0:24:47.960 --> 0:24:50.679
<v Speaker 1>threw in with the distinguished dealer Richard Faken for a

0:24:50.720 --> 0:24:56.840
<v Speaker 1>short lived venture no managerial skills at all. Fiken later grumbled.

0:24:57.840 --> 0:25:01.040
<v Speaker 1>Despite his lack of funds, her Bert never lost his

0:25:01.119 --> 0:25:04.000
<v Speaker 1>sense of humor. He would come into the Knoedler and

0:25:04.080 --> 0:25:07.320
<v Speaker 1>pretend he was a collector. It calls a Knodler staffer.

0:25:08.080 --> 0:25:11.360
<v Speaker 1>Herbert would say, I'm furious that Kndler has not delivered

0:25:11.440 --> 0:25:14.480
<v Speaker 1>my art for three months. I've been calling. I've paid

0:25:14.480 --> 0:25:18.440
<v Speaker 1>for it already unquote. He was funny, says the staffer.

0:25:19.800 --> 0:25:25.160
<v Speaker 1>By the time David Herbert died, he'd become almost a destitute.

0:25:25.800 --> 0:25:28.960
<v Speaker 1>He had a very hard last couple of years, recalls

0:25:29.000 --> 0:25:32.000
<v Speaker 1>a friend from his gallery. He was basically living on

0:25:32.160 --> 0:25:37.199
<v Speaker 1>friends and really had no retirement money. As long as

0:25:37.280 --> 0:25:40.480
<v Speaker 1>David Herbert was alive, these paintings weren't going to come out,

0:25:40.720 --> 0:25:44.359
<v Speaker 1>and Friedman said in vanity fair quote. The fear was

0:25:44.400 --> 0:25:46.880
<v Speaker 1>that if the paintings came out, while Herbert was alive,

0:25:47.400 --> 0:25:50.600
<v Speaker 1>Herbert might have been extremely upset and he might have

0:25:50.640 --> 0:25:53.639
<v Speaker 1>revealed the identity of the owner. There's no question that

0:25:53.680 --> 0:25:56.399
<v Speaker 1>the paintings would have been paid for with cash. Tax

0:25:56.520 --> 0:25:59.960
<v Speaker 1>is not paid, assets not declared, and you can go

0:26:00.040 --> 0:26:06.280
<v Speaker 1>to jail for that end quote. So sure was Anne

0:26:06.280 --> 0:26:09.560
<v Speaker 1>about the newly modified back story that she even gave

0:26:09.600 --> 0:26:12.960
<v Speaker 1>a new name to the paintings coming from Glypia Rosalis.

0:26:13.480 --> 0:26:17.800
<v Speaker 1>The paintings, she said, now constituted the David Herbert collection

0:26:19.320 --> 0:26:23.159
<v Speaker 1>once David Herbert passed away, and said, that's when Mr

0:26:23.440 --> 0:26:27.640
<v Speaker 1>x Jr. Felt he could release these paintings. More than

0:26:27.760 --> 0:26:32.520
<v Speaker 1>one Knodler staffer saw a victim in retrospect, him Andrade.

0:26:33.400 --> 0:26:36.720
<v Speaker 1>Perhaps Andrade had told Anne stories of his old friend

0:26:36.800 --> 0:26:40.679
<v Speaker 1>David Herbert. Maybe he had acknowledged that Herbert might have

0:26:40.760 --> 0:26:44.080
<v Speaker 1>sold some of these paintings on the slide. Still, if

0:26:44.080 --> 0:26:46.960
<v Speaker 1>he had colluded with Anne and Glyphia, where was the

0:26:47.040 --> 0:26:51.439
<v Speaker 1>profit in it for him? Himie did not profit from it.

0:26:51.720 --> 0:26:54.119
<v Speaker 1>He never got a commission, so there's nothing on him,

0:26:54.240 --> 0:26:57.760
<v Speaker 1>says an ex Nodler staffer. He was horrified by all

0:26:57.800 --> 0:27:01.200
<v Speaker 1>that happened. The staffer adds, I you're very sorry for him.

0:27:01.280 --> 0:27:04.920
<v Speaker 1>He's a gentleman of the older kind. And now all

0:27:05.000 --> 0:27:09.199
<v Speaker 1>and Ratty had was a ghostly cobweb department filled with

0:27:09.280 --> 0:27:13.240
<v Speaker 1>South American art next door to the gallery he loved

0:27:13.320 --> 0:27:18.600
<v Speaker 1>so much. As for David Herbert, he too seemed a victim,

0:27:18.640 --> 0:27:22.720
<v Speaker 1>even if a posthumous one. It's very easy to put

0:27:22.760 --> 0:27:25.680
<v Speaker 1>something on him, because he's not around to dispute it,

0:27:25.720 --> 0:27:29.239
<v Speaker 1>said Herbert's friend from the gallery. What should have been

0:27:29.320 --> 0:27:32.920
<v Speaker 1>early red flags at the Knoedler Gallery, those early deep

0:27:32.960 --> 0:27:36.640
<v Speaker 1>and Corn drawings, that brilliant Rothko and now the returned

0:27:36.720 --> 0:27:42.200
<v Speaker 1>Levy Pollock instead remained art world secrets. For now, none

0:27:42.240 --> 0:27:45.479
<v Speaker 1>of them stirred any attention because sales of the works

0:27:45.520 --> 0:27:49.720
<v Speaker 1>remained confidential. As it turned out, the Levy Pollock that

0:27:49.800 --> 0:27:53.080
<v Speaker 1>I far had judged to be not a legitimate work

0:27:53.480 --> 0:27:56.800
<v Speaker 1>was actually one of several Pollocks that Ann Friedman would

0:27:56.800 --> 0:28:10.679
<v Speaker 1>eventually snatch up from Gfia Rosales more art fraud in

0:28:10.720 --> 0:28:15.919
<v Speaker 1>a minute, No one knew the true story of the

0:28:15.960 --> 0:28:21.879
<v Speaker 1>Knodler Galleries finances. Later, when the galleries money manager testified

0:28:21.880 --> 0:28:24.600
<v Speaker 1>at trial, he would say that the paintings of the

0:28:24.680 --> 0:28:28.160
<v Speaker 1>David Herbert collection were not merely helpful to the galleries

0:28:28.200 --> 0:28:34.000
<v Speaker 1>bottom line. They were essential. Without those sales, the k

0:28:34.000 --> 0:28:37.280
<v Speaker 1>Nobler would have been losing big money. By two thousand four,

0:28:38.080 --> 0:28:42.080
<v Speaker 1>thanks to his paintings, the Kndler was at least getting by.

0:28:43.800 --> 0:28:47.360
<v Speaker 1>Joe Stephens, the Notler's long serving art handler, sensed the

0:28:47.400 --> 0:28:49.880
<v Speaker 1>true state of the gallery when he was abruptly fired

0:28:49.920 --> 0:28:53.960
<v Speaker 1>after nearly forty five years on the job. My heart

0:28:54.000 --> 0:28:56.400
<v Speaker 1>and soul was in that place. I'd love to work

0:28:56.440 --> 0:29:00.600
<v Speaker 1>in there, and I was good at it. To be honest,

0:29:00.760 --> 0:29:05.160
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to kill her. I hated hug Guts and

0:29:05.200 --> 0:29:09.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't hate anybody, but she made life miserable for

0:29:09.680 --> 0:29:12.400
<v Speaker 1>me and the girls by keeping him there. Everything. She

0:29:12.560 --> 0:29:17.560
<v Speaker 1>walked three blocks and she's home. I think she knew that.

0:29:17.680 --> 0:29:21.400
<v Speaker 1>I knew things were going on. That's probably why I

0:29:21.480 --> 0:29:25.120
<v Speaker 1>got dumped. I don't know for sure. Can we put

0:29:25.120 --> 0:29:32.000
<v Speaker 1>it that way as your suspicion? And was now squarely

0:29:32.000 --> 0:29:35.479
<v Speaker 1>focused on selling works from the David Herbert collection, and

0:29:35.560 --> 0:29:41.240
<v Speaker 1>that was becoming a very dangerous enterprise. By two thousand five,

0:29:41.360 --> 0:29:45.480
<v Speaker 1>the contemporary art market had soared thanks to a fivefold

0:29:45.600 --> 0:29:49.680
<v Speaker 1>increase in new billionaires since the nineteen eighties, and the

0:29:49.720 --> 0:29:55.520
<v Speaker 1>billionaires loved contemporary art. They loved the status it conferred to.

0:29:56.400 --> 0:29:59.520
<v Speaker 1>Most of all, they loved the profits many contemporary artists

0:29:59.520 --> 0:30:03.640
<v Speaker 1>were general rating. The new meme was art as an asset.

0:30:05.080 --> 0:30:07.120
<v Speaker 1>The market was now more than a place to buy

0:30:07.120 --> 0:30:11.280
<v Speaker 1>and sell art. It was a lifestyle. Wealthy collectors jetted

0:30:11.320 --> 0:30:14.160
<v Speaker 1>to art fares around the world, greeting each other like

0:30:14.240 --> 0:30:18.040
<v Speaker 1>old friends. They attended glittering parties held by the biggest

0:30:18.080 --> 0:30:21.680
<v Speaker 1>and most powerful dealers at the Venice Bionale at Art

0:30:21.680 --> 0:30:25.120
<v Speaker 1>Basel in Switzerland, and at the Freeze Fairs in London,

0:30:25.480 --> 0:30:28.840
<v Speaker 1>l A and New York. Entree to the club didn't

0:30:28.840 --> 0:30:33.320
<v Speaker 1>require old money or expertise in art, not anymore. All

0:30:33.360 --> 0:30:35.440
<v Speaker 1>you needed to join the club with money and a

0:30:35.440 --> 0:30:39.560
<v Speaker 1>willingness to spend it. Art has become the status symbol,

0:30:39.640 --> 0:30:42.880
<v Speaker 1>as dealer Gavin Brown put it, the lingua franca of

0:30:42.960 --> 0:30:47.600
<v Speaker 1>the wealthy. At some point in the early two thousands,

0:30:48.040 --> 0:30:51.360
<v Speaker 1>Cfra and Carlos attempted to open their own gallery in

0:30:51.400 --> 0:30:55.240
<v Speaker 1>the Chelsea neighborhood of New York City. It was aloft

0:30:55.360 --> 0:31:00.360
<v Speaker 1>on Nineteenth Street. Carlos called it King's Fine Art. Records

0:31:00.520 --> 0:31:05.320
<v Speaker 1>suggest he staged exactly one opening a trio of Cuban

0:31:05.320 --> 0:31:12.360
<v Speaker 1>American artists who went nowhere found the gallery ridiculous. You know,

0:31:12.480 --> 0:31:15.880
<v Speaker 1>he was a show off, and he wants to presume

0:31:16.000 --> 0:31:19.480
<v Speaker 1>that he was a businessman. Of course, did you work

0:31:19.480 --> 0:31:22.760
<v Speaker 1>with him at that gallery or now? It? Well, not really,

0:31:22.800 --> 0:31:25.640
<v Speaker 1>like I said, It was occasionally in and he was

0:31:25.680 --> 0:31:32.280
<v Speaker 1>the one who was putting it together. The Chelsea Loft

0:31:32.520 --> 0:31:35.360
<v Speaker 1>that Carlos opened was a bush league effort to join

0:31:35.440 --> 0:31:39.440
<v Speaker 1>the art market in earnest serious dealers. Those who, for

0:31:39.560 --> 0:31:43.080
<v Speaker 1>starters dealt in authentic art were in a whole other world,

0:31:43.600 --> 0:31:48.600
<v Speaker 1>one that Carlos and could only dream of. By now,

0:31:48.840 --> 0:31:53.080
<v Speaker 1>the best abstract expressionist works were all but impossible to

0:31:53.160 --> 0:31:58.360
<v Speaker 1>acquire unless she were willing to pay stratospheric prices. Hedge

0:31:58.360 --> 0:32:01.720
<v Speaker 1>fund manager Ken Griffin would become famous for buying a

0:32:01.800 --> 0:32:05.160
<v Speaker 1>dacooning and a pollock in a package deal for five

0:32:05.240 --> 0:32:11.720
<v Speaker 1>hundred million dollars. With all this frenzy, the contemporary art

0:32:11.720 --> 0:32:15.280
<v Speaker 1>market rose from roughly twenty billion in two thousand to

0:32:15.360 --> 0:32:18.600
<v Speaker 1>sixty three billion in two thousand eight. In the midst

0:32:18.640 --> 0:32:22.600
<v Speaker 1>of this hyperactive market, Anne had begun publicly showcasing works

0:32:22.880 --> 0:32:26.800
<v Speaker 1>from the David Herbert collection. The mecca for New York

0:32:26.920 --> 0:32:30.240
<v Speaker 1>art dealers was the annual Armory Show, hosted by the

0:32:30.320 --> 0:32:33.400
<v Speaker 1>Art Dealers Association of America or a d a A.

0:32:34.680 --> 0:32:37.920
<v Speaker 1>The Park Avenue Armory is a vast, high vaulted space

0:32:38.360 --> 0:32:42.520
<v Speaker 1>that once sheltered Union military troops and their horses. Any

0:32:42.560 --> 0:32:45.160
<v Speaker 1>dealer worth their salt was compelled to rent a booth

0:32:45.200 --> 0:32:50.400
<v Speaker 1>at the Armory Show, seemingly confident that her latest works

0:32:50.400 --> 0:32:54.200
<v Speaker 1>from the David Herbert collection were genuine, and began displaying

0:32:54.200 --> 0:32:57.920
<v Speaker 1>the paintings at each a d a a Show. Every

0:32:57.920 --> 0:33:00.760
<v Speaker 1>time we got a painting from Glyphira, we'd hang it

0:33:00.840 --> 0:33:03.720
<v Speaker 1>in the Knodler's booth at the Armory, and later told

0:33:03.800 --> 0:33:08.560
<v Speaker 1>Vanity Fair had anyone found anything wrong, she noted, believe me,

0:33:08.600 --> 0:33:11.400
<v Speaker 1>I would have been told take that down off the wall.

0:33:12.480 --> 0:33:14.760
<v Speaker 1>She would never take more than one of those to

0:33:14.840 --> 0:33:18.800
<v Speaker 1>the Armory Show, notes one ex staffer. It might be

0:33:18.920 --> 0:33:21.680
<v Speaker 1>flanked by a great Milton Avery landscape, or maybe a

0:33:21.760 --> 0:33:24.760
<v Speaker 1>Robert Motherwell, so it was surrounded by the creme de

0:33:24.840 --> 0:33:29.440
<v Speaker 1>la creme with impeccable provenance. It wasn't some po dunk Pollock.

0:33:30.680 --> 0:33:33.920
<v Speaker 1>Another ex staffer rolls his eyes at that there was

0:33:33.960 --> 0:33:36.400
<v Speaker 1>either a Pollock or a Newman on display at the

0:33:36.440 --> 0:33:40.320
<v Speaker 1>Kndler booth. The staffer recalls of one year's display. People

0:33:40.360 --> 0:33:43.440
<v Speaker 1>began whispering, you have to go look, but don't say anything.

0:33:44.080 --> 0:33:47.200
<v Speaker 1>Everyone knew it was fake. Everyone was laughing about it,

0:33:47.880 --> 0:33:50.320
<v Speaker 1>But as Patricia Cohen of The New York Times notes,

0:33:50.800 --> 0:33:53.520
<v Speaker 1>they were all instructed by lawyers not to say anything.

0:33:54.040 --> 0:34:00.200
<v Speaker 1>Why the fear of being sued. As those brilliant but

0:34:00.240 --> 0:34:03.840
<v Speaker 1>baffling works kept popping up, Freedman's fellow dealers made a

0:34:03.880 --> 0:34:06.400
<v Speaker 1>blood sport and speculating about which, if any, of the

0:34:06.440 --> 0:34:09.680
<v Speaker 1>paintings in the David Herbert collection were real, and why

0:34:09.680 --> 0:34:13.160
<v Speaker 1>did Anne Freeman keep promoting pictures one after another that

0:34:13.280 --> 0:34:19.719
<v Speaker 1>had no provenance, as one Armory show followed another, and

0:34:19.840 --> 0:34:24.719
<v Speaker 1>believe that her paintings were acquiring provenance by simply being exhibited.

0:34:26.560 --> 0:34:30.520
<v Speaker 1>Dealers found that absurd bullshit, that it's a building block

0:34:30.640 --> 0:34:35.319
<v Speaker 1>toward authentication. One dealer snorted, she kept trotting out this

0:34:35.400 --> 0:34:38.719
<v Speaker 1>ship at the Armory shows. I saw the Barnet Newman there,

0:34:38.840 --> 0:34:42.120
<v Speaker 1>the roth Coo there, the Pollock there. All were fake,

0:34:42.400 --> 0:34:46.839
<v Speaker 1>the dealer muttered to his colleagues. Yet Anne seemed oblivious

0:34:47.080 --> 0:34:51.200
<v Speaker 1>to their inauthenticity. The dealer said, if you don't have

0:34:51.280 --> 0:34:53.520
<v Speaker 1>an eye, and you don't have the ability to discern

0:34:53.600 --> 0:34:57.839
<v Speaker 1>differences in an artist's work, you're lost. I don't care

0:34:57.840 --> 0:35:03.160
<v Speaker 1>how much secondary research you do, and left those Armory

0:35:03.200 --> 0:35:07.840
<v Speaker 1>shows with a sense of exultation. Her masterpieces had survived

0:35:07.920 --> 0:35:11.839
<v Speaker 1>another gauntlet. A few of her rival dealers even through

0:35:11.880 --> 0:35:15.480
<v Speaker 1>her a word of affirmation, a vague word or two,

0:35:15.600 --> 0:35:19.560
<v Speaker 1>but enough for Ann to go on the Levy Pollock

0:35:19.680 --> 0:35:23.320
<v Speaker 1>declared all but fake by e far had incensed Anne

0:35:24.440 --> 0:35:27.600
<v Speaker 1>worse and had jeopardized the business she'd worked so hard

0:35:27.800 --> 0:35:34.239
<v Speaker 1>to keep afloat The Nodler needed a miracle. Magically, GPA

0:35:34.320 --> 0:35:37.759
<v Speaker 1>would conjure up a Jackson Pollock painting so brilliant that

0:35:37.800 --> 0:35:41.560
<v Speaker 1>no one would cast doubt on its authenticity, one that

0:35:41.600 --> 0:35:45.640
<v Speaker 1>would ultimately command the highest price ever paid for a work.

0:35:45.719 --> 0:35:51.480
<v Speaker 1>Emerging from Patient Kwan's garage in Queens must have been

0:35:51.560 --> 0:35:54.560
<v Speaker 1>January two twenty and he started talking to me about

0:35:54.560 --> 0:35:57.440
<v Speaker 1>the Nobler case. He was warning a tuxedo so as

0:35:57.480 --> 0:36:00.359
<v Speaker 1>I was a big formal wedding, and I and well,

0:36:01.120 --> 0:36:04.520
<v Speaker 1>somebody told me that Pierre Legrange was a really stupid person.

0:36:05.320 --> 0:36:08.360
<v Speaker 1>I said, I think that buying a painting for Man Friedman,

0:36:08.600 --> 0:36:11.760
<v Speaker 1>he must be a real dumb shit. He got screwed

0:36:11.840 --> 0:36:14.040
<v Speaker 1>for seventeen million dollars. And he looked at me and

0:36:14.040 --> 0:36:19.440
<v Speaker 1>he said, on Pierre Le Grand, the seventeen million dollar

0:36:19.600 --> 0:36:24.960
<v Speaker 1>Jackson Pollock. That's next time on Art Fraud, Love Last

0:36:25.360 --> 0:36:31.600
<v Speaker 1>at a King HEGs, don't be the thing on the

0:36:31.640 --> 0:36:41.359
<v Speaker 1>Street of Dreams, Dreams broken into can't be made like

0:36:41.600 --> 0:36:49.760
<v Speaker 1>new on the Street of Dreams. Art Fraud is brought

0:36:49.760 --> 0:36:53.799
<v Speaker 1>to you by my Heart Radio and Cavalry Audio. Our

0:36:53.880 --> 0:36:58.840
<v Speaker 1>executive producers are Matt del Piano, Keegan Rosenberger, Andy Turner, myself,

0:36:59.200 --> 0:37:02.920
<v Speaker 1>and Michael sn Ayerson. We're produced by Brandon Morgan and

0:37:03.000 --> 0:37:07.720
<v Speaker 1>Zach McNeice. Zach also edited and mixed this episode. Lindsay

0:37:07.760 --> 0:37:12.400
<v Speaker 1>Hoffman is our managing producer. Howard Writer is Michael Schneyerson.