WEBVTT - William J. Bernstein on Crowd Behavior (Podcast)

0:00:00.080 --> 0:00:06.040
<v Speaker 1>M This is Mesters in Business with Very Renaults on

0:00:06.240 --> 0:00:10.840
<v Speaker 1>Bluebird Radio this week on the podcast What Can I Say?

0:00:11.039 --> 0:00:17.200
<v Speaker 1>Bill Bernstein is a brilliant author neurologists, financial theorists, investor.

0:00:17.920 --> 0:00:21.400
<v Speaker 1>His most recent book, The Delusion of Crowds, Why People

0:00:21.440 --> 0:00:24.040
<v Speaker 1>Go Man in Groups is going to be one of

0:00:24.040 --> 0:00:28.760
<v Speaker 1>those must read books in the pantheon of both bubbles

0:00:28.800 --> 0:00:35.240
<v Speaker 1>and behavioral finance. He's written so many books, Birth of Plenty, Investors,

0:00:35.320 --> 0:00:40.520
<v Speaker 1>Asset Allocator, four Pillars of Investing, just just just too

0:00:40.520 --> 0:00:43.159
<v Speaker 1>many to mention. I find Bill to be one of

0:00:43.200 --> 0:00:49.040
<v Speaker 1>those really unique people who has a number of insights

0:00:49.080 --> 0:00:54.600
<v Speaker 1>into the world of investing, partly because he's a neurologist

0:00:54.680 --> 0:00:58.720
<v Speaker 1>and really spent a lot of time learning how people's

0:00:58.800 --> 0:01:04.360
<v Speaker 1>brains function and what drives us in our decision making process.

0:01:04.360 --> 0:01:08.679
<v Speaker 1>But just as important, he's a historian and a deep

0:01:08.760 --> 0:01:13.399
<v Speaker 1>researcher and author, and so not only does he understand

0:01:13.600 --> 0:01:18.160
<v Speaker 1>the neurology and the cognitive science of our brains, but

0:01:18.520 --> 0:01:21.920
<v Speaker 1>he is very familiar with all of the academic literature

0:01:22.319 --> 0:01:25.160
<v Speaker 1>and all of the actual history of what's taken place

0:01:25.720 --> 0:01:29.279
<v Speaker 1>over the past pick a timeframe five hundred, a thousand,

0:01:29.360 --> 0:01:33.000
<v Speaker 1>two thousand years and so all of his work is

0:01:33.040 --> 0:01:36.720
<v Speaker 1>always a deep dive. Every page is filled with so

0:01:36.800 --> 0:01:41.200
<v Speaker 1>much fascinating information. I'm really enjoying Delusions of Crowds. I'm

0:01:41.200 --> 0:01:45.200
<v Speaker 1>about halfway through it. All of his books are absolutely

0:01:45.400 --> 0:01:48.240
<v Speaker 1>essential reading to me. So if you are at all

0:01:48.360 --> 0:01:57.560
<v Speaker 1>interested in anything from cognitive theory, behavioral finance, investing, anthropology,

0:01:58.360 --> 0:02:02.600
<v Speaker 1>bubble behavior, bitcoin, in Tesla, you name it, you're gonna

0:02:02.640 --> 0:02:06.440
<v Speaker 1>find this to be just a fascinating dive. So, with

0:02:06.520 --> 0:02:13.800
<v Speaker 1>no further delay, my conversation with William Bernstein. This is

0:02:13.960 --> 0:02:19.440
<v Speaker 1>mesters in Business with very Renaults on Bloombern Radio. My

0:02:19.760 --> 0:02:23.919
<v Speaker 1>extra special guest this week is William Bernstein. He began

0:02:24.200 --> 0:02:29.640
<v Speaker 1>his career as a neurologist before becoming an author, financial theorist,

0:02:29.720 --> 0:02:33.919
<v Speaker 1>and investment advisor. He's written a dozen books, the most

0:02:34.040 --> 0:02:38.519
<v Speaker 1>recent of which is The Delusion of Crowds, Why People

0:02:38.600 --> 0:02:43.480
<v Speaker 1>Go Mad in Groups. Who better to discuss people going

0:02:43.600 --> 0:02:50.519
<v Speaker 1>insane than a neurologist investor William Bernstein, Welcome back to Bloomberg.

0:02:50.960 --> 0:02:54.520
<v Speaker 1>As always a pleasure, Barry. So let's dive right into this.

0:02:54.639 --> 0:02:58.000
<v Speaker 1>But before you were an investor and an author, you

0:02:58.120 --> 0:03:01.600
<v Speaker 1>worked as a medical doctor, with this specialty in neurology,

0:03:01.680 --> 0:03:07.080
<v Speaker 1>How did that background help you as an investor? Really

0:03:07.240 --> 0:03:10.280
<v Speaker 1>only in a very indirect way. You would think that

0:03:10.400 --> 0:03:15.679
<v Speaker 1>being a clinical neurologist would help you with psychology uh

0:03:15.680 --> 0:03:20.799
<v Speaker 1>and the neuropsychology, but really practicing neurology is a very

0:03:21.360 --> 0:03:24.600
<v Speaker 1>down and dirty, ground level occupation. Um. You know what

0:03:24.720 --> 0:03:28.120
<v Speaker 1>I like to explain to people, uh, is that the

0:03:28.160 --> 0:03:31.360
<v Speaker 1>great neuroscientists that we think of. Uh. You know, people

0:03:31.400 --> 0:03:35.360
<v Speaker 1>like the Demasio's are like great artists, or Michelangelo's and

0:03:35.440 --> 0:03:38.640
<v Speaker 1>da Vinci's. Or is what I did was more Sherwin Williams.

0:03:38.640 --> 0:03:41.480
<v Speaker 1>It was met pain in back pain. Rather, what helped

0:03:41.480 --> 0:03:45.000
<v Speaker 1>me write about finance is simply the scientific training and

0:03:45.120 --> 0:03:48.760
<v Speaker 1>back of being a doctor. Uh. And you know the

0:03:48.760 --> 0:03:56.000
<v Speaker 1>importance of examining data, seeking it out and rigorously analyzing it. Interesting. So,

0:03:56.000 --> 0:03:58.520
<v Speaker 1>so I mentioned to some colleagues that I was going

0:03:58.560 --> 0:04:01.480
<v Speaker 1>to be speaking with you, and one of them, uh

0:04:01.600 --> 0:04:04.280
<v Speaker 1>said to ask you. Michael Batnick said to ask you,

0:04:04.800 --> 0:04:08.240
<v Speaker 1>when you started writing Why People Go Mad in Groups?

0:04:08.320 --> 0:04:10.320
<v Speaker 1>Did you expect it to come out at a time

0:04:10.400 --> 0:04:14.600
<v Speaker 1>when people were in fact going mad in groups? No?

0:04:14.800 --> 0:04:17.760
<v Speaker 1>This is the very definition of dumb. Luck. As it

0:04:17.760 --> 0:04:21.440
<v Speaker 1>turns out, my publisher decided to delay bring the book

0:04:21.440 --> 0:04:24.200
<v Speaker 1>out for about six months because they didn't want to

0:04:24.200 --> 0:04:26.400
<v Speaker 1>bring it out right before the election, because they figured

0:04:26.400 --> 0:04:30.520
<v Speaker 1>out would suck up too much of people's bandwidth. Uh.

0:04:30.600 --> 0:04:34.680
<v Speaker 1>And so it got delayed until just at the moment

0:04:34.720 --> 0:04:37.920
<v Speaker 1>when people started, you know, believing in Q and on

0:04:38.000 --> 0:04:42.880
<v Speaker 1>and occupying the Capitol building and going nuts over bitcoin

0:04:42.960 --> 0:04:46.680
<v Speaker 1>and game stop. So we'll we'll get to just about

0:04:46.760 --> 0:04:49.960
<v Speaker 1>each and every one of those things. But it leads

0:04:50.000 --> 0:04:54.720
<v Speaker 1>to an obvious question, how has the Internet changed the

0:04:54.760 --> 0:04:59.040
<v Speaker 1>psychology of crowds? How has it affected how people respond

0:04:59.200 --> 0:05:02.880
<v Speaker 1>to these men as delusions? Well, you can think of

0:05:03.000 --> 0:05:09.359
<v Speaker 1>a mass delusion the same way you think of the pandemic. Uh.

0:05:09.400 --> 0:05:12.640
<v Speaker 1>There is an agent, a causative agent. So in the

0:05:12.680 --> 0:05:15.320
<v Speaker 1>case of the pandemic, it's the coronavirus. In the case

0:05:15.360 --> 0:05:19.159
<v Speaker 1>of the Black Death, it was your seni epestus uh.

0:05:19.200 --> 0:05:22.839
<v Speaker 1>And then there's a vector, and the vector for COVID

0:05:23.160 --> 0:05:27.920
<v Speaker 1>is people uh, coughing and springing each other with droplets. Uh.

0:05:27.960 --> 0:05:31.640
<v Speaker 1>And with the Black Death it was you know, fleas

0:05:31.680 --> 0:05:36.120
<v Speaker 1>and rats transmitting the disease across great distances. What's the

0:05:36.200 --> 0:05:39.839
<v Speaker 1>same thing. It's the same way with UH. With delusions,

0:05:39.880 --> 0:05:43.159
<v Speaker 1>the the agent is the narrative UH. And the more

0:05:43.200 --> 0:05:47.520
<v Speaker 1>compelling the narrative, the more virulent, the more dangerous the agent.

0:05:47.960 --> 0:05:50.480
<v Speaker 1>And then you've got the vector UH. And the vector

0:05:50.600 --> 0:05:55.279
<v Speaker 1>is the medium through which the delusion spreads. UH. And

0:05:55.480 --> 0:05:58.159
<v Speaker 1>what we saw over the past ten years of the

0:05:58.200 --> 0:06:02.080
<v Speaker 1>evolution in the explosion of social media UH. And so

0:06:02.160 --> 0:06:05.000
<v Speaker 1>that is one of the most powerful vectors of delusions

0:06:05.000 --> 0:06:07.880
<v Speaker 1>that we've ever we've ever seen. And it's kind of

0:06:07.920 --> 0:06:09.880
<v Speaker 1>like we've gone, you know, in the in the days

0:06:09.920 --> 0:06:13.080
<v Speaker 1>of the old media, from being you know, widely separated

0:06:13.120 --> 0:06:16.760
<v Speaker 1>people who are infected UH. And we've gone now into

0:06:16.839 --> 0:06:19.520
<v Speaker 1>a world where everybody's in the same small, aerless room

0:06:19.560 --> 0:06:22.560
<v Speaker 1>and they're coughing on each other. So let's stay with

0:06:22.640 --> 0:06:25.400
<v Speaker 1>the idea of narrative. M One of the things you

0:06:25.680 --> 0:06:30.279
<v Speaker 1>refer to is that human beings are cognitive misers, and

0:06:30.320 --> 0:06:35.560
<v Speaker 1>according to psychologists, we much prefer mental shortcuts and heuristics

0:06:35.880 --> 0:06:40.040
<v Speaker 1>and a compelling narrative. What is the role of narratives

0:06:40.320 --> 0:06:45.000
<v Speaker 1>in these manias? Well, the narrative is the causative agent. Okay,

0:06:45.120 --> 0:06:48.159
<v Speaker 1>you can think of the narrative as being viral to

0:06:48.240 --> 0:06:53.080
<v Speaker 1>the extent that it's compelling. And what psychologists have found

0:06:53.600 --> 0:06:57.320
<v Speaker 1>is that the more compelling a narrative is, the more

0:06:57.360 --> 0:07:03.800
<v Speaker 1>corrosive it is to our cognitive ability, in our analytical ability. Uh.

0:07:03.839 --> 0:07:06.360
<v Speaker 1>And so you know what I did in the book

0:07:06.400 --> 0:07:12.000
<v Speaker 1>was I identified the most compelling narratives that we're exposed to.

0:07:12.080 --> 0:07:14.480
<v Speaker 1>And the one, of course, it's most financially afflictable, as

0:07:14.520 --> 0:07:18.840
<v Speaker 1>a narrative that you can become effortlessly rich just by

0:07:19.080 --> 0:07:22.400
<v Speaker 1>going online and clicking a few keys and there's almost

0:07:22.400 --> 0:07:25.040
<v Speaker 1>no every involved. That's a very pleasing and a very

0:07:25.080 --> 0:07:30.400
<v Speaker 1>compelling narrative. The other narrative that I examined a great

0:07:30.480 --> 0:07:34.080
<v Speaker 1>length in the book is the most compelling religious narrative

0:07:34.120 --> 0:07:35.600
<v Speaker 1>out there, which is the one that the world is

0:07:35.640 --> 0:07:38.520
<v Speaker 1>going to end very quickly, which it turns out is

0:07:38.520 --> 0:07:42.240
<v Speaker 1>far more prevalent than most people in your in my bubble,

0:07:42.880 --> 0:07:45.840
<v Speaker 1>uh think that it is. So let's stay with that

0:07:45.880 --> 0:07:51.880
<v Speaker 1>because there's some really fascinating combinations of apocalyptic end times

0:07:51.960 --> 0:07:55.920
<v Speaker 1>and investment mania. One of the things I've found about

0:07:56.000 --> 0:08:01.640
<v Speaker 1>the hardcore goldbugs as well as the hyper inflationists is

0:08:02.200 --> 0:08:05.720
<v Speaker 1>that overlap between Hey, when it hits the fan and

0:08:05.760 --> 0:08:08.760
<v Speaker 1>it all goes down. You better have some gold coins

0:08:08.760 --> 0:08:12.040
<v Speaker 1>because that paper money will be worthless. That seems to

0:08:12.160 --> 0:08:18.040
<v Speaker 1>really combine the religious armageddon with the financial armageddon. Yeah,

0:08:18.080 --> 0:08:21.440
<v Speaker 1>and you can throw into that conspiracy theories. Uh. You know.

0:08:21.520 --> 0:08:26.040
<v Speaker 1>Social psychologists have found that the two biggest correlates of

0:08:26.280 --> 0:08:29.520
<v Speaker 1>conspiracy theories are a belief in the end times, that

0:08:29.680 --> 0:08:33.000
<v Speaker 1>is the theological the religious end times. Uh. And the

0:08:33.040 --> 0:08:37.520
<v Speaker 1>other characteristic that it correlates with is manichey and thinking.

0:08:37.520 --> 0:08:41.600
<v Speaker 1>I believe that the world is divided into black and white,

0:08:41.640 --> 0:08:45.240
<v Speaker 1>good people and bad people with nothing in between the

0:08:45.280 --> 0:08:48.600
<v Speaker 1>maniche and personality. Could people never do bad things and

0:08:48.760 --> 0:08:50.800
<v Speaker 1>bad people never do good things, even though we know

0:08:50.880 --> 0:08:54.080
<v Speaker 1>that happens all the time. Yeah, that binary approach to

0:08:54.240 --> 0:08:58.120
<v Speaker 1>reality seems to be a gross over simplification, and it

0:08:58.520 --> 0:09:02.760
<v Speaker 1>certainly doesn't work for investing. I can't imagine it works

0:09:02.800 --> 0:09:06.240
<v Speaker 1>in day to day life, although people certainly seem to

0:09:06.240 --> 0:09:12.719
<v Speaker 1>be functioning despite holding some pretty insane beliefs. Yeah, absolutely,

0:09:12.760 --> 0:09:15.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean you're right. Occasionally, you know, Jim Kramer gets

0:09:15.160 --> 0:09:20.160
<v Speaker 1>things right. So Kramer is an interesting example because he

0:09:20.320 --> 0:09:25.240
<v Speaker 1>leads um a group of followers. Uh. You could say

0:09:25.280 --> 0:09:28.240
<v Speaker 1>the same thing about barstool sports. You could say the

0:09:28.280 --> 0:09:33.160
<v Speaker 1>same thing about a number of different either financial or

0:09:33.160 --> 0:09:37.280
<v Speaker 1>religious movements. But when we look at either Robin Hood

0:09:37.440 --> 0:09:41.160
<v Speaker 1>or or read It's Wall Street Bets, there are no

0:09:41.679 --> 0:09:45.040
<v Speaker 1>leaders there. There are no proselytizers there. Can you have

0:09:45.200 --> 0:09:48.280
<v Speaker 1>a mob with no leader? I think there's something like

0:09:48.320 --> 0:09:52.000
<v Speaker 1>ten million people follow Wall Street Bets, but no one

0:09:52.080 --> 0:09:55.480
<v Speaker 1>person controls that group. Oh, absolutely, that's the way it

0:09:55.520 --> 0:09:58.840
<v Speaker 1>happened most of the time. Uh. You know, when someone

0:09:58.880 --> 0:10:02.000
<v Speaker 1>goes up on a lead and threatens to jump and

0:10:02.559 --> 0:10:07.280
<v Speaker 1>a crowd gathers below them, A small percentage of the time,

0:10:07.440 --> 0:10:10.319
<v Speaker 1>maybe you know, a few percent, maybe five or ten

0:10:10.360 --> 0:10:13.080
<v Speaker 1>percent of the time, people start shouting up for the

0:10:13.120 --> 0:10:16.600
<v Speaker 1>person to jump. All right, Uh, this is a one

0:10:16.600 --> 0:10:20.160
<v Speaker 1>of the sad, you know, accouterments of human nature. Well,

0:10:20.200 --> 0:10:24.040
<v Speaker 1>certainly there's no leader there, and it's it's certainly possible.

0:10:24.080 --> 0:10:27.200
<v Speaker 1>In fact, I think that history shows that most math

0:10:27.280 --> 0:10:31.640
<v Speaker 1>meanias really don't have an identifiable leader. Quite interesting. So

0:10:32.000 --> 0:10:35.199
<v Speaker 1>there's some really fascinating quotes throughout the book I want

0:10:35.240 --> 0:10:39.360
<v Speaker 1>to start with. More often than not, we avoid contrary

0:10:39.400 --> 0:10:43.720
<v Speaker 1>facts and data when we cannot avoid them. Are erroneous assessments,

0:10:43.760 --> 0:10:49.160
<v Speaker 1>will occasionally even harden them and yet more amazingly, make

0:10:49.280 --> 0:10:54.120
<v Speaker 1>us more likely to proselytize them. This sounds very much

0:10:54.440 --> 0:10:58.440
<v Speaker 1>like cognitive dissonance. Is how key a factor is that

0:10:58.679 --> 0:11:03.680
<v Speaker 1>in both religious and financial decision making. Well, you said

0:11:03.679 --> 0:11:07.720
<v Speaker 1>the magic the magic words uh. You know, cognitive difference

0:11:07.840 --> 0:11:09.959
<v Speaker 1>was something that was written about and talked about by

0:11:10.040 --> 0:11:15.000
<v Speaker 1>Leon Festinger, although he didn't invent the term uh and uh,

0:11:15.880 --> 0:11:19.080
<v Speaker 1>it's you know, it's it's it's somewhat overdone, I think,

0:11:19.160 --> 0:11:22.760
<v Speaker 1>especially in modern culture, but it's certainly still a fact that.

0:11:23.040 --> 0:11:27.280
<v Speaker 1>Really what cognitive disfinance is about and confirmation bias is about,

0:11:27.440 --> 0:11:32.200
<v Speaker 1>is it's not necessarily doubling down or reinforcing your beliefs

0:11:32.240 --> 0:11:35.400
<v Speaker 1>when presented with contrary data, although that happens all the time,

0:11:35.679 --> 0:11:39.840
<v Speaker 1>but it's more the avoidance of inconvenient uh facts and

0:11:39.960 --> 0:11:42.600
<v Speaker 1>things that this confirm your theory. And to give you

0:11:42.640 --> 0:11:45.120
<v Speaker 1>an example, there are people out there who believe that

0:11:45.160 --> 0:11:48.280
<v Speaker 1>the Bible is perfectly prophetic, and there are a lot

0:11:48.280 --> 0:11:51.840
<v Speaker 1>of very prophetic things in the Bible, things that came true,

0:11:52.320 --> 0:11:54.400
<v Speaker 1>But there are a lot more things with the Bible

0:11:54.520 --> 0:11:58.640
<v Speaker 1>prophesieses that didn't come true, and those get conveniently ignored

0:11:58.880 --> 0:12:02.280
<v Speaker 1>by religious fundamental with So you mentioned in the book

0:12:02.520 --> 0:12:08.040
<v Speaker 1>State of Balance that let's say you're not a Trump supporter,

0:12:08.160 --> 0:12:10.320
<v Speaker 1>but a good friend of yours is a Trump supporter.

0:12:11.240 --> 0:12:17.000
<v Speaker 1>That creates an inherent tention that not just the political debate,

0:12:17.600 --> 0:12:21.000
<v Speaker 1>but the ability to reconcile. Hey, here's a person I like,

0:12:21.920 --> 0:12:24.920
<v Speaker 1>but they have views I disagree with. How does that

0:12:25.000 --> 0:12:28.439
<v Speaker 1>state of balance get reconciled in a brain? And I

0:12:28.480 --> 0:12:31.240
<v Speaker 1>don't know if that's the best example from the book,

0:12:31.320 --> 0:12:35.920
<v Speaker 1>but just that concept of being able to manage two

0:12:35.960 --> 0:12:40.800
<v Speaker 1>inconsistent beliefs at the same time. Well, what you're talking

0:12:40.840 --> 0:12:44.280
<v Speaker 1>about is a concept that was written about in by

0:12:44.280 --> 0:12:46.880
<v Speaker 1>a psychologist by the name of the Fritz Tighter, and

0:12:46.880 --> 0:12:50.319
<v Speaker 1>it's an important concept because it explains a lot. So

0:12:50.360 --> 0:12:52.160
<v Speaker 1>I'll spend just a little bit of time on it,

0:12:52.480 --> 0:12:56.840
<v Speaker 1>which is that of the balanced state. So let's say

0:12:56.840 --> 0:13:01.000
<v Speaker 1>that you're, you know, a Trump supporter, okay, uh, and

0:13:01.679 --> 0:13:04.040
<v Speaker 1>you meet someone and they're a Trump supporter and you

0:13:04.080 --> 0:13:06.520
<v Speaker 1>really like the person, all right, then you're in a

0:13:06.559 --> 0:13:10.600
<v Speaker 1>balanced state. All right. Now, if you meet someone who

0:13:10.640 --> 0:13:14.280
<v Speaker 1>thinks that Donald Trump is Satan incarnate and you think

0:13:14.320 --> 0:13:16.800
<v Speaker 1>that that person is a charcoal head, then you're in

0:13:16.840 --> 0:13:19.640
<v Speaker 1>a balance state too, because it enables you to dismiss

0:13:19.840 --> 0:13:23.520
<v Speaker 1>his or her opinion. But on the other hand, if

0:13:24.040 --> 0:13:26.640
<v Speaker 1>you're a Trump supporter and you disagree with your very

0:13:26.679 --> 0:13:30.440
<v Speaker 1>best friend about it about Donald Trump, then you're in

0:13:30.520 --> 0:13:33.000
<v Speaker 1>an unbalanced state and you have to resolve that you

0:13:33.080 --> 0:13:36.400
<v Speaker 1>have to or either have to decide that Donald Trump

0:13:36.480 --> 0:13:38.839
<v Speaker 1>isn't so good, or you have to decide that you

0:13:38.880 --> 0:13:41.000
<v Speaker 1>don't like your friends so much anymore, which is much

0:13:41.000 --> 0:13:44.920
<v Speaker 1>more likely to happen because people find it easier to

0:13:44.960 --> 0:13:50.680
<v Speaker 1>lose their friends than to completely obliterate their their belief system. Uh.

0:13:50.720 --> 0:13:55.040
<v Speaker 1>And so you can actually do functional magnetic resonance imaging

0:13:55.240 --> 0:13:57.280
<v Speaker 1>and you can see these two mechanisms at work. You

0:13:57.280 --> 0:13:59.640
<v Speaker 1>can see certain areas of the brain lighting up when

0:13:59.679 --> 0:14:02.760
<v Speaker 1>you're in a balanced state, and you can see certain

0:14:02.760 --> 0:14:06.160
<v Speaker 1>other areas of the brain light up when you're in

0:14:06.160 --> 0:14:08.719
<v Speaker 1>an unbalanced state, and then when that gets resolved, you

0:14:08.760 --> 0:14:11.400
<v Speaker 1>see other areas of the brain light up. So when

0:14:11.440 --> 0:14:16.199
<v Speaker 1>we hear about family members having disputes with other family

0:14:16.240 --> 0:14:20.280
<v Speaker 1>members over Q and on and people literally being cut

0:14:20.320 --> 0:14:24.040
<v Speaker 1>off by their parents and others who have fallen prey

0:14:24.120 --> 0:14:27.640
<v Speaker 1>to do we call it a cult or a belief system.

0:14:28.640 --> 0:14:33.560
<v Speaker 1>Is that balanced state issue? What's underlying that schism with

0:14:33.720 --> 0:14:38.160
<v Speaker 1>even within families? Yes, uh to to to to get

0:14:38.560 --> 0:14:41.200
<v Speaker 1>to bring in a four bit term, that's the classic

0:14:41.280 --> 0:14:45.360
<v Speaker 1>Hiberian unbalanced state and it has to be resolved one

0:14:45.360 --> 0:14:47.120
<v Speaker 1>way or the other. And the way most people resolved

0:14:47.200 --> 0:14:49.960
<v Speaker 1>if they cut themselves off from people who they have

0:14:50.040 --> 0:14:55.640
<v Speaker 1>strong political uh disagreements with. Quite interesting. Let's move towards uh,

0:14:55.840 --> 0:14:59.240
<v Speaker 1>fear and greed. Those are the phrases I've always heard

0:14:59.720 --> 0:15:03.880
<v Speaker 1>in finance. But if we want to get more specific

0:15:04.080 --> 0:15:08.000
<v Speaker 1>that when we look at the limbic system, you discuss

0:15:08.120 --> 0:15:11.960
<v Speaker 1>more precisely, I'm gonna I'm gonna mangle this the nuclei,

0:15:12.000 --> 0:15:18.560
<v Speaker 1>accumbents and the amygdala. How important is the limbic system

0:15:18.600 --> 0:15:23.600
<v Speaker 1>to our financial behavior? Well, it's almost everything. Uh. And

0:15:24.040 --> 0:15:26.960
<v Speaker 1>you know to the extent that you succeed in finance,

0:15:27.400 --> 0:15:30.760
<v Speaker 1>you succeed in finance to the extent that you can

0:15:30.800 --> 0:15:35.000
<v Speaker 1>suppress the Limbic system, your system one, which is the

0:15:35.120 --> 0:15:38.480
<v Speaker 1>very fast moving emotional system that we have. If you

0:15:38.520 --> 0:15:43.560
<v Speaker 1>can't suppress that, you're probably going to die poor. That's interesting.

0:15:43.600 --> 0:15:49.200
<v Speaker 1>I have a few more specific questions from the neurology perspective,

0:15:49.800 --> 0:15:54.600
<v Speaker 1>also from the perspective of evolutionary history. You reference a

0:15:54.720 --> 0:16:01.800
<v Speaker 1>preference for quote rationalization over rationality. Whatever luctionary purpose does

0:16:01.880 --> 0:16:06.560
<v Speaker 1>that serve well? In a state of nature, you have

0:16:06.800 --> 0:16:10.400
<v Speaker 1>to react very quickly. If you see, you know, black

0:16:10.400 --> 0:16:12.960
<v Speaker 1>and yellow stripes in your peripheral vision, or you hear

0:16:13.000 --> 0:16:15.000
<v Speaker 1>the history the stake, you would better move and better

0:16:15.040 --> 0:16:19.120
<v Speaker 1>move quickly. Uh. And that leads to a number of things.

0:16:19.200 --> 0:16:22.040
<v Speaker 1>But number one is the dominance of your fast moving

0:16:22.080 --> 0:16:25.600
<v Speaker 1>limbic system. The limbic system is the fastest moving uh,

0:16:25.760 --> 0:16:28.640
<v Speaker 1>central structure that you that you have, at least you

0:16:28.680 --> 0:16:32.000
<v Speaker 1>know in your brain it is UH. And you know

0:16:32.000 --> 0:16:35.760
<v Speaker 1>the central nervous system extends below the brain, but that's

0:16:35.520 --> 0:16:39.440
<v Speaker 1>been getting too much in the weeds. Uh, And so

0:16:40.040 --> 0:16:43.960
<v Speaker 1>evolutionarily it's got real survival value. But it also leads

0:16:44.000 --> 0:16:49.440
<v Speaker 1>to something else, which is patternization. Okay, seeing patterns uh

0:16:49.560 --> 0:16:53.760
<v Speaker 1>that really aren't there, because there's relatively little penalty for

0:16:53.880 --> 0:16:55.720
<v Speaker 1>doing that. If you if you if you think you

0:16:55.760 --> 0:16:58.320
<v Speaker 1>see yellow and black black stripes and your periphle vision

0:16:58.320 --> 0:17:00.680
<v Speaker 1>and you jump but it's really not a tiger, it's

0:17:00.800 --> 0:17:03.840
<v Speaker 1>something else. You haven't lost much. But if you under

0:17:03.880 --> 0:17:07.120
<v Speaker 1>interpret the black and yellow stripes, then you're then you're lunch.

0:17:08.080 --> 0:17:12.639
<v Speaker 1>So false positive evolutionary drive that let neat leave us

0:17:12.640 --> 0:17:15.639
<v Speaker 1>to over interpret things. And the analogy I think that's

0:17:15.680 --> 0:17:18.240
<v Speaker 1>that's best is that you know, if you're a skunk,

0:17:18.520 --> 0:17:20.680
<v Speaker 1>millions of years of evolution have told you that when

0:17:20.720 --> 0:17:24.080
<v Speaker 1>you need a large predator, you turn a hundred maybe degrees,

0:17:24.119 --> 0:17:27.840
<v Speaker 1>lift your tail and spread uh. And that's you know,

0:17:28.000 --> 0:17:30.840
<v Speaker 1>very very functional and very useful in a state of nature.

0:17:31.280 --> 0:17:33.960
<v Speaker 1>But in a semi urban environment where the biggest threat

0:17:34.200 --> 0:17:36.520
<v Speaker 1>to your existence is a hunk of steel weighing two

0:17:36.560 --> 0:17:42.679
<v Speaker 1>tons moving at sixty that is not a functional response.

0:17:42.920 --> 0:17:46.320
<v Speaker 1>And unfortunately that's the world we live in today. So

0:17:46.520 --> 0:17:51.200
<v Speaker 1>false positives carry no cost, but false negatives are really

0:17:51.240 --> 0:17:55.720
<v Speaker 1>significant from an evolutionary perspective, From an evolution yeah, but

0:17:55.800 --> 0:17:58.960
<v Speaker 1>today it's the other way around. Today, the false positives

0:17:59.000 --> 0:18:02.439
<v Speaker 1>that we're that we're proned to have a very high cost.

0:18:02.920 --> 0:18:06.720
<v Speaker 1>So let's stay with that theme. Humans attend to bad

0:18:06.800 --> 0:18:11.240
<v Speaker 1>news much more strongly than good news. We focus on

0:18:11.440 --> 0:18:17.000
<v Speaker 1>negative outcomes. What's the genetic advantage of being more biased

0:18:17.400 --> 0:18:21.199
<v Speaker 1>to spotting bad news than good news. Well, again, it's

0:18:21.240 --> 0:18:25.000
<v Speaker 1>got obvious survival value in the first place. It's something

0:18:25.000 --> 0:18:27.560
<v Speaker 1>that's almost so obvious that we never we never talked

0:18:27.560 --> 0:18:31.200
<v Speaker 1>about it. Uh, you know, I mean things generally getting

0:18:31.200 --> 0:18:33.720
<v Speaker 1>better is not what makes it to the headlines, all right,

0:18:35.560 --> 0:18:37.359
<v Speaker 1>So we don't attend to good news as much as

0:18:37.359 --> 0:18:39.800
<v Speaker 1>we attend to bad news. And in a state of nature,

0:18:39.880 --> 0:18:44.040
<v Speaker 1>once again, it had obvious, uh survival value. One of

0:18:44.040 --> 0:18:48.399
<v Speaker 1>the questions I get asked as as a doctor or

0:18:48.400 --> 0:18:50.600
<v Speaker 1>good get asked as a doctor. And people who still

0:18:50.640 --> 0:18:52.520
<v Speaker 1>ask me that this question is you know, when I

0:18:52.640 --> 0:18:55.640
<v Speaker 1>was uh five year you know, I was ten years old,

0:18:55.720 --> 0:19:00.359
<v Speaker 1>I I ate uh some some some Chinese food, and

0:19:00.359 --> 0:19:02.199
<v Speaker 1>I got hardly sick and sick. And I've not been

0:19:02.240 --> 0:19:04.760
<v Speaker 1>able to look at Chinese fude ever since. Why is

0:19:04.840 --> 0:19:07.600
<v Speaker 1>that I can't? I can't get past it? And the

0:19:07.640 --> 0:19:09.639
<v Speaker 1>answer is very simple. It's in a state of nature,

0:19:09.680 --> 0:19:13.360
<v Speaker 1>you ate a certain mushroom and it made you sick, uh,

0:19:13.760 --> 0:19:15.920
<v Speaker 1>never wanting to have that mushroom again. It was a

0:19:16.000 --> 0:19:20.919
<v Speaker 1>very useful response. Interesting, So I love the quote you

0:19:21.280 --> 0:19:25.720
<v Speaker 1>used from Charles Kindleberger there's nothing so disturbing to one's

0:19:25.760 --> 0:19:29.000
<v Speaker 1>well being in judgment as to see a friend get rich.

0:19:29.600 --> 0:19:32.080
<v Speaker 1>Why is that break that down from us? For us,

0:19:32.600 --> 0:19:38.080
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't somebody in your tribe getting rich help your own

0:19:38.320 --> 0:19:44.040
<v Speaker 1>survival prospects from a historical basis? Well, what would be?

0:19:44.280 --> 0:19:46.520
<v Speaker 1>You know what my book really is is it's really

0:19:46.520 --> 0:19:51.240
<v Speaker 1>a meditation on human nature. So we've already discussed the

0:19:51.280 --> 0:19:55.359
<v Speaker 1>fact that, you know, man is the ape to tell stories. Uh.

0:19:56.440 --> 0:19:58.520
<v Speaker 1>The foremost thing, which we haven't talked about yet, as

0:19:58.600 --> 0:20:02.240
<v Speaker 1>man is the ape it imitates. But the third most

0:20:02.280 --> 0:20:06.280
<v Speaker 1>important characteristic of human nature I talk about is man

0:20:06.359 --> 0:20:10.600
<v Speaker 1>is the ape that seeks status. Uh. Why do we

0:20:10.640 --> 0:20:14.120
<v Speaker 1>seek status? Well, because it helps us pass on our

0:20:14.240 --> 0:20:17.000
<v Speaker 1>d n A, particularly if you're a male, uh. You

0:20:17.040 --> 0:20:21.679
<v Speaker 1>know it's it's why rock stars uh and and athletes

0:20:21.720 --> 0:20:24.120
<v Speaker 1>do so well with with women, because in a state

0:20:24.119 --> 0:20:26.679
<v Speaker 1>of nature, if you're good at telling stories, or if

0:20:26.720 --> 0:20:30.760
<v Speaker 1>you're good at hunting animals, uh, you can support meats.

0:20:30.800 --> 0:20:33.560
<v Speaker 1>So it's the same thing. It's it's it's a very

0:20:33.600 --> 0:20:37.359
<v Speaker 1>it's a very basic part of sexual selection. We seek

0:20:37.400 --> 0:20:39.479
<v Speaker 1>status so he can pass on our d n A.

0:20:40.440 --> 0:20:44.760
<v Speaker 1>Quite interesting, So let's talk about some of the parallels

0:20:44.800 --> 0:20:49.399
<v Speaker 1>between religious zealotry and financial mania. If we were to

0:20:49.480 --> 0:20:54.320
<v Speaker 1>think about how social epidemics like financial bubbles and and

0:20:54.720 --> 0:21:00.480
<v Speaker 1>violent end time apocalyptic perspectives originate and p up a gate,

0:21:01.240 --> 0:21:08.200
<v Speaker 1>why is there such parallels between finance and religion because

0:21:08.560 --> 0:21:14.520
<v Speaker 1>they basically involved pretty much the same the same draws. Uh.

0:21:14.920 --> 0:21:19.840
<v Speaker 1>You know, I've talked about how compelling financial narratives can

0:21:20.040 --> 0:21:23.440
<v Speaker 1>sweep people up in its ambit and the same thing

0:21:23.480 --> 0:21:28.200
<v Speaker 1>happens with compelling religious narratives. Now, if we want to

0:21:28.240 --> 0:21:31.199
<v Speaker 1>look at you know, compelling narratives, and we want to

0:21:31.240 --> 0:21:34.400
<v Speaker 1>go at the rubric of bad is more compelling than

0:21:34.440 --> 0:21:37.440
<v Speaker 1>good or bad is stronger than good, then the most

0:21:37.440 --> 0:21:39.720
<v Speaker 1>compelling narrative in the all the world has to be

0:21:39.760 --> 0:21:42.560
<v Speaker 1>the one in which the world ends uh in a

0:21:42.640 --> 0:21:46.240
<v Speaker 1>in a fiery inferno. Uh. And so that's the compelling

0:21:46.320 --> 0:21:49.520
<v Speaker 1>narrative that really gets people's attention. And then to bring

0:21:49.560 --> 0:21:53.880
<v Speaker 1>the status part of it in, uh. You know, if

0:21:53.880 --> 0:21:55.680
<v Speaker 1>the world is going to end in fiery in a

0:21:56.040 --> 0:22:00.600
<v Speaker 1>fiery inferno, then what more pleasing outcome than if you're

0:22:00.640 --> 0:22:04.439
<v Speaker 1>able to avoid it because you and your friends are developed.

0:22:04.760 --> 0:22:09.160
<v Speaker 1>So that speaks to our desire to acquire both status

0:22:09.160 --> 0:22:12.119
<v Speaker 1>and you know, the financial narratives, You're going to become

0:22:12.160 --> 0:22:16.280
<v Speaker 1>effortlessly rich, that's very pleasing. The religious narrative is that

0:22:16.359 --> 0:22:18.440
<v Speaker 1>the world everybody is going to go to hell except

0:22:18.480 --> 0:22:21.760
<v Speaker 1>repeat you and people who believe like you. And it's

0:22:21.840 --> 0:22:24.720
<v Speaker 1>it's very pleasing. It gives you and you're in group status.

0:22:24.800 --> 0:22:28.399
<v Speaker 1>So on. A very related quote from the book, quote

0:22:28.400 --> 0:22:32.639
<v Speaker 1>immersion and narrative brings about isolation from the facts of

0:22:32.680 --> 0:22:38.040
<v Speaker 1>the real world end quote. How significant is that separation

0:22:38.240 --> 0:22:42.200
<v Speaker 1>from real world facts, both in finance and in religion,

0:22:42.880 --> 0:22:47.600
<v Speaker 1>and what happens when people are confronted with the truth

0:22:47.880 --> 0:22:51.879
<v Speaker 1>of their disconnect from real world facts. Well, in finance,

0:22:52.000 --> 0:22:54.760
<v Speaker 1>that's one of the ways that you identify a mania

0:22:55.040 --> 0:22:58.040
<v Speaker 1>or a bubble. It's one of the characteristics which is

0:22:58.200 --> 0:23:02.119
<v Speaker 1>when you disconfirmed, when you get the disconfirming opinion to

0:23:02.200 --> 0:23:05.159
<v Speaker 1>someone who is in the grips of a financial mania,

0:23:05.240 --> 0:23:08.640
<v Speaker 1>this delusion that they're going to become effortlessly rich. Uh,

0:23:08.680 --> 0:23:11.880
<v Speaker 1>they pushed back and they get very angry. Uh. And

0:23:12.000 --> 0:23:14.920
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if you this happened to you, what

0:23:15.280 --> 0:23:17.280
<v Speaker 1>you were doing, you know, back in the late nineties.

0:23:17.720 --> 0:23:20.879
<v Speaker 1>But I was still in middle age back then, and

0:23:20.960 --> 0:23:24.560
<v Speaker 1>when I would express skepticism about the Internet bubble, people

0:23:24.640 --> 0:23:26.959
<v Speaker 1>just didn't disagree with me. They got angry at me.

0:23:27.280 --> 0:23:29.160
<v Speaker 1>They told me I just didn't get it. They told

0:23:29.200 --> 0:23:31.600
<v Speaker 1>me I was an idiot, and one or two, uh,

0:23:31.720 --> 0:23:36.240
<v Speaker 1>people made dispersions about my my parenthood. Uh. They don't

0:23:36.280 --> 0:23:39.040
<v Speaker 1>like that at all. And that was an experience that

0:23:39.080 --> 0:23:41.360
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people had. And it's the same thing

0:23:41.359 --> 0:23:44.640
<v Speaker 1>obviously with with religions. Why you don't argue with people

0:23:44.680 --> 0:23:47.879
<v Speaker 1>ever about religion. You don't want to even think about

0:23:47.880 --> 0:23:51.240
<v Speaker 1>disconfirming their their religious beliefs. So I had a very

0:23:51.280 --> 0:23:54.119
<v Speaker 1>similar experience leading up to the O eight oh nine

0:23:55.000 --> 0:23:59.320
<v Speaker 1>financial crisis. I was barish on stocks, real estate derivatives,

0:23:59.760 --> 0:24:03.600
<v Speaker 1>and in the beginning, people just laughed. There was just

0:24:03.720 --> 0:24:07.280
<v Speaker 1>complete and total you know, you're out of your mind.

0:24:07.640 --> 0:24:11.520
<v Speaker 1>But it was only a little later that it became anger.

0:24:11.720 --> 0:24:15.680
<v Speaker 1>And then once it turned out, I got lucky. Nobody

0:24:15.720 --> 0:24:18.359
<v Speaker 1>wanted to talk about it and everybody was seemed to

0:24:18.359 --> 0:24:22.359
<v Speaker 1>be convinced that they saw it coming. Also, Yeah, my

0:24:22.480 --> 0:24:25.840
<v Speaker 1>favorite example of that was, you know, in summer around

0:24:25.840 --> 0:24:29.880
<v Speaker 1>oh six four seven, I was listening to Bob Schiller

0:24:30.200 --> 0:24:34.119
<v Speaker 1>be interviewed by somebody about the real estate bubble that

0:24:34.240 --> 0:24:37.640
<v Speaker 1>was still evolving at that point, and he was being

0:24:37.640 --> 0:24:41.080
<v Speaker 1>interviewed alongside of someone from you know, the National Association

0:24:41.119 --> 0:24:45.680
<v Speaker 1>of Realities. Uh, And she wasn't having any any part

0:24:45.680 --> 0:24:48.760
<v Speaker 1>of it. And finally she got so frustrated with Professor

0:24:48.800 --> 0:24:51.720
<v Speaker 1>Schiller that she stopped and said, Professor Schiller, I don't

0:24:51.760 --> 0:24:54.359
<v Speaker 1>know who you think you are, but you don't know

0:24:54.400 --> 0:24:59.720
<v Speaker 1>the first thing about real estate. That's hilarious Nobel Prize

0:24:59.760 --> 0:25:03.080
<v Speaker 1>to So he has another quote from the another quote

0:25:03.080 --> 0:25:05.840
<v Speaker 1>from the book that I like religious manias tend to

0:25:05.880 --> 0:25:10.040
<v Speaker 1>play out in the worst of times, during which mankind

0:25:10.160 --> 0:25:14.119
<v Speaker 1>desires delivery from its troubles and a return to the

0:25:14.200 --> 0:25:17.680
<v Speaker 1>quote unquote good old days. So what is it about

0:25:17.760 --> 0:25:21.800
<v Speaker 1>the good old days that seems so compelling to people?

0:25:22.960 --> 0:25:26.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't know the answer to that, but it is

0:25:26.640 --> 0:25:32.600
<v Speaker 1>a constant, near constant feature of human nature to believe

0:25:33.240 --> 0:25:36.040
<v Speaker 1>that things were always better a generation or two or

0:25:36.080 --> 0:25:42.440
<v Speaker 1>three generations ago, when it's manifestly not the that's manifestly

0:25:42.480 --> 0:25:44.040
<v Speaker 1>not the case. And you can see it all the

0:25:44.080 --> 0:25:47.440
<v Speaker 1>way back to the dawn of literacy. I mean, one

0:25:47.440 --> 0:25:51.399
<v Speaker 1>of the first archaic Greek Hellas was fellow named Hesiod

0:25:51.480 --> 0:25:54.240
<v Speaker 1>who was no well known for a collection that he

0:25:54.280 --> 0:25:59.040
<v Speaker 1>wrote called Works some Days. Uh, and he talks about how,

0:25:59.280 --> 0:26:01.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, four or five generations, there was a there

0:26:01.800 --> 0:26:05.160
<v Speaker 1>was a generation of golden men who lived wonderful lives

0:26:05.200 --> 0:26:08.200
<v Speaker 1>and were virtuous and we're prosperous, and then with each

0:26:08.240 --> 0:26:12.159
<v Speaker 1>success of generation, things went went went to hell in

0:26:12.200 --> 0:26:15.320
<v Speaker 1>a handbasket until you know, they were in the current

0:26:15.359 --> 0:26:18.879
<v Speaker 1>generation when no one respected their elders and the world

0:26:19.119 --> 0:26:23.280
<v Speaker 1>was corrupt and things were generally generally awful. Uh. It was,

0:26:23.320 --> 0:26:26.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, the origin of kids these days. Two areas

0:26:26.080 --> 0:26:29.800
<v Speaker 1>where people tend to go mad our religion and money.

0:26:29.960 --> 0:26:34.760
<v Speaker 1>And some people have talked about some current assets that

0:26:34.800 --> 0:26:38.320
<v Speaker 1>have run up as combining the two. And I think

0:26:38.359 --> 0:26:40.440
<v Speaker 1>you could look at bitcoin that way, you could look

0:26:40.440 --> 0:26:43.399
<v Speaker 1>at Tesla that way. What are your thoughts on on

0:26:43.440 --> 0:26:49.239
<v Speaker 1>those two particular assets. Well, I think certainly bitcoin is

0:26:49.800 --> 0:26:54.359
<v Speaker 1>exhibits all the behavior of a bubble. Uh. You you

0:26:54.400 --> 0:26:57.239
<v Speaker 1>see large groups of people who think that they're going

0:26:57.240 --> 0:27:02.400
<v Speaker 1>to become effortlessly rich investing in bitcoin. Uh. You see

0:27:02.440 --> 0:27:07.720
<v Speaker 1>people quitting their jobs to trade it. Uh. You see

0:27:08.200 --> 0:27:12.920
<v Speaker 1>uh anger directed at you when you express skepticism. My

0:27:12.960 --> 0:27:19.800
<v Speaker 1>favorite bit of anger uh was uh John McAfee's famous

0:27:19.840 --> 0:27:22.520
<v Speaker 1>statement that he would perform an act on himself that

0:27:22.880 --> 0:27:26.960
<v Speaker 1>requires great spinal flexibility on national TV if it didn't

0:27:27.040 --> 0:27:29.680
<v Speaker 1>hit a half a million dollars and then finally a

0:27:29.800 --> 0:27:37.000
<v Speaker 1>date that's already passed right here, he lost that bad Yeah. Yeah,

0:27:37.280 --> 0:27:42.480
<v Speaker 1>so so you see that. Uh, you know, with with with,

0:27:42.600 --> 0:27:46.080
<v Speaker 1>certainly with bitcoin. Now Tesla is a more difficult case.

0:27:46.119 --> 0:27:49.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean, Tesla may actually wind up being a very

0:27:49.400 --> 0:27:54.399
<v Speaker 1>successful uh company. Whether it will justify it it's evaluation

0:27:54.640 --> 0:27:57.000
<v Speaker 1>is another story. There are other people in the world,

0:27:57.080 --> 0:27:59.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, how to make electric vehicles besides figuring on

0:27:59.320 --> 0:28:04.560
<v Speaker 1>a musk uh, And so it's not immediately clear that's

0:28:04.600 --> 0:28:08.639
<v Speaker 1>what's going on. I don't see the kind of mania

0:28:08.720 --> 0:28:12.520
<v Speaker 1>surrounding Tesla stock. What I see the mania surrounding is

0:28:12.560 --> 0:28:16.119
<v Speaker 1>the Tesla car, which is a different thing. Uh. The

0:28:16.200 --> 0:28:18.880
<v Speaker 1>real passion that I see, but not the people love

0:28:18.920 --> 0:28:23.040
<v Speaker 1>their Tesla stock. It's it's the the the evangelicism of

0:28:23.400 --> 0:28:26.320
<v Speaker 1>people who love the Tesla cars. I'm going to take

0:28:26.359 --> 0:28:28.440
<v Speaker 1>it a step further than that. I just had the

0:28:28.520 --> 0:28:31.920
<v Speaker 1>Mustang Machee for a week to play with. And it's

0:28:31.960 --> 0:28:35.520
<v Speaker 1>not even the cars, it's the software within the car.

0:28:36.040 --> 0:28:40.640
<v Speaker 1>Whenever I've discussed the Mustang with other Tesla owners, the

0:28:40.760 --> 0:28:45.400
<v Speaker 1>comparing contrast is not the build quality or the design

0:28:45.960 --> 0:28:48.480
<v Speaker 1>or some of the things that Ford does really well.

0:28:49.400 --> 0:28:53.360
<v Speaker 1>It's the network of superchargers. It's the order over the

0:28:53.440 --> 0:28:57.280
<v Speaker 1>air automatic updates, it's the self driving. It's all these

0:28:57.320 --> 0:29:02.440
<v Speaker 1>software things that Tesla has created beyond the actual vehicle itself.

0:29:02.480 --> 0:29:05.560
<v Speaker 1>It's kind of fascinating. Yeah, well, that's because you and

0:29:05.560 --> 0:29:08.960
<v Speaker 1>I are older than dirt and we you know, of

0:29:09.000 --> 0:29:12.880
<v Speaker 1>a generation when cars were really really important. Uh you know,

0:29:12.960 --> 0:29:15.880
<v Speaker 1>to young people, their their phones and the capability of

0:29:15.880 --> 0:29:18.000
<v Speaker 1>their phones are much more important in the capability of

0:29:18.040 --> 0:29:22.040
<v Speaker 1>their cars. So my generation, a car meant freedom. But

0:29:22.520 --> 0:29:26.160
<v Speaker 1>the current generation, I don't think, feels the same way

0:29:26.200 --> 0:29:31.040
<v Speaker 1>about escaping a small town as Bruce Springsteen did in

0:29:31.080 --> 0:29:35.120
<v Speaker 1>in Born to Run. It's it's certainly a generational difference.

0:29:35.600 --> 0:29:39.040
<v Speaker 1>So what's interesting to me. There's a lot of things

0:29:39.080 --> 0:29:41.960
<v Speaker 1>interesting to me about this book. But you discussed in

0:29:42.000 --> 0:29:47.560
<v Speaker 1>the introduction on how Charles McKay was really the influence

0:29:47.600 --> 0:29:51.080
<v Speaker 1>and the inspiration for this. So what motivated you to

0:29:51.200 --> 0:29:57.040
<v Speaker 1>want to update the original work by Charles McKay about

0:29:57.160 --> 0:30:02.080
<v Speaker 1>the Madness of crowds. Well, yeah, the I was uh

0:30:02.600 --> 0:30:05.480
<v Speaker 1>a journalist who in eighteen four you and writes this

0:30:05.560 --> 0:30:10.120
<v Speaker 1>book Memoirs of Extraordinarily Popular Delusions in the Madness of Crowds,

0:30:10.200 --> 0:30:12.680
<v Speaker 1>And as you and I both well know, it's a

0:30:12.760 --> 0:30:15.400
<v Speaker 1>seminal book in finance. It's one of those books that

0:30:15.520 --> 0:30:18.479
<v Speaker 1>you tell every practitioner at some point to read because

0:30:18.520 --> 0:30:23.720
<v Speaker 1>it described the two great bubbles of the of the

0:30:23.760 --> 0:30:27.920
<v Speaker 1>eighteenth century and also the supposed bubble that surrounded uh

0:30:28.160 --> 0:30:31.680
<v Speaker 1>toolip bulbs in the seventeenth century, which turns out not

0:30:31.800 --> 0:30:35.480
<v Speaker 1>to be as a society wide phenomenon is as mackay

0:30:35.640 --> 0:30:38.360
<v Speaker 1>made it out to be. But it's the most famous

0:30:38.440 --> 0:30:40.480
<v Speaker 1>chapter in the book because he coins the word tool

0:30:40.520 --> 0:30:43.360
<v Speaker 1>of mania uh and gives it to the to the

0:30:43.400 --> 0:30:47.720
<v Speaker 1>English language, and so for generations after that the book

0:30:47.760 --> 0:30:52.120
<v Speaker 1>has remained in print and has saved people's bacon. UH.

0:30:52.240 --> 0:30:55.120
<v Speaker 1>Bernard Baruke famously read the book in n right before

0:30:55.160 --> 0:30:59.000
<v Speaker 1>the crash in nineteen o seven and recognized the signs

0:30:59.040 --> 0:31:02.480
<v Speaker 1>of the time, and he loved the book so much

0:31:02.480 --> 0:31:05.440
<v Speaker 1>that he actually wrote the introduction to the nineteen thirty

0:31:05.480 --> 0:31:10.120
<v Speaker 1>two edition of the book. And of course I read

0:31:10.120 --> 0:31:13.000
<v Speaker 1>the book in the mid nineteen nineties, just before the

0:31:13.000 --> 0:31:16.680
<v Speaker 1>tech bubble started to really get going, and I thought

0:31:16.680 --> 0:31:19.240
<v Speaker 1>it was vaguely interesting, was sort of like a bad

0:31:19.280 --> 0:31:22.880
<v Speaker 1>B movie about the Roman Empire. It wasn't really relevant

0:31:22.880 --> 0:31:25.880
<v Speaker 1>to the financial markets at the time, which were pretty

0:31:25.880 --> 0:31:30.240
<v Speaker 1>well behaved in retrospect. Uh. And then all of a sudden,

0:31:30.280 --> 0:31:33.479
<v Speaker 1>before my very eyes, I saw this bubble blow, and

0:31:34.280 --> 0:31:36.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, it saved my bacon the way it did

0:31:36.800 --> 0:31:39.760
<v Speaker 1>probably most other people who had read the book, So

0:31:39.840 --> 0:31:44.480
<v Speaker 1>that sort of stayed in my memory banks. Uh. And

0:31:44.520 --> 0:31:49.200
<v Speaker 1>then you know, five or six years ago, Uh, I

0:31:49.240 --> 0:31:51.960
<v Speaker 1>observed the way everybody else did, the ability of the

0:31:52.040 --> 0:31:55.920
<v Speaker 1>Islamic state to attract tens of thousands of people from

0:31:55.920 --> 0:32:00.840
<v Speaker 1>around the world, uh, including from some a prosperous and

0:32:00.880 --> 0:32:03.720
<v Speaker 1>secure Western nations, to go to one of the most

0:32:03.800 --> 0:32:06.760
<v Speaker 1>dangerous and worst places on the world and to you know,

0:32:07.280 --> 0:32:10.960
<v Speaker 1>to be make cases to to die or to become

0:32:11.040 --> 0:32:15.240
<v Speaker 1>seriously injured. And the way they did it, it turns out,

0:32:15.320 --> 0:32:19.040
<v Speaker 1>was not by deploying this end Times narrative, which Mackay

0:32:19.120 --> 0:32:21.959
<v Speaker 1>had also written about in in his book, and I

0:32:21.960 --> 0:32:24.160
<v Speaker 1>realized at that point I had to update the book

0:32:24.560 --> 0:32:27.040
<v Speaker 1>because you know, we now know a lot more about

0:32:27.040 --> 0:32:31.040
<v Speaker 1>the neuropsychology of why these things occur, which mackay couldn't

0:32:31.080 --> 0:32:33.080
<v Speaker 1>know because of the state of science at the time.

0:32:33.680 --> 0:32:37.240
<v Speaker 1>So I love this quote from Charles McKay quote, men,

0:32:37.400 --> 0:32:40.240
<v Speaker 1>it has been said thinking herds, it will be seen

0:32:40.320 --> 0:32:43.400
<v Speaker 1>that they go mad and herds while they only recover

0:32:43.520 --> 0:32:49.120
<v Speaker 1>their senses more slowly and one by one. Why is that, Well,

0:32:49.160 --> 0:32:54.080
<v Speaker 1>it's because this confirmation is is a solitary process. It's

0:32:54.080 --> 0:32:56.760
<v Speaker 1>a process where you have to look inside yourself and say,

0:32:57.120 --> 0:33:00.240
<v Speaker 1>my god, I was an idiot. Uh. And it's a

0:33:00.320 --> 0:33:03.600
<v Speaker 1>very individual process, whereas the spreading of the media, the

0:33:03.640 --> 0:33:07.120
<v Speaker 1>spreading of the virus of the contagion is is a

0:33:07.160 --> 0:33:11.480
<v Speaker 1>is a social process. So you mentioned social networks earlier,

0:33:11.560 --> 0:33:14.480
<v Speaker 1>whether it's Facebook or Twitter, or or TikTok or what

0:33:14.560 --> 0:33:19.720
<v Speaker 1>have you. Um, they seem to be accelerating both the

0:33:19.840 --> 0:33:23.719
<v Speaker 1>creation of these memes and the way they're propagated. Do

0:33:23.760 --> 0:33:28.280
<v Speaker 1>you think they're a key factor in some of these episodes,

0:33:28.320 --> 0:33:30.680
<v Speaker 1>how quickly they seem to come out of nowhere, how

0:33:30.800 --> 0:33:33.800
<v Speaker 1>big they blow up, And then what happens to them

0:33:33.840 --> 0:33:37.880
<v Speaker 1>after the fact. Yes, I think that's that's absolutely true.

0:33:38.320 --> 0:33:42.600
<v Speaker 1>A meania can spread more rapidly and more widely today

0:33:42.720 --> 0:33:46.680
<v Speaker 1>than it ever could before. The thing that's that's really

0:33:46.760 --> 0:33:49.760
<v Speaker 1>interesting is that, you know, with each iteration, with each

0:33:49.920 --> 0:33:56.840
<v Speaker 1>advance in communications technology, you have the potential for accelerating delusions.

0:33:56.880 --> 0:34:00.920
<v Speaker 1>For example, it's no accident that uhs that I wrote

0:34:00.920 --> 0:34:05.440
<v Speaker 1>about in the book were sixteenth century episodes that's followed

0:34:05.680 --> 0:34:08.200
<v Speaker 1>hard on the heels of the invention of the printing press.

0:34:08.280 --> 0:34:11.920
<v Speaker 1>That wasn't an accident, all right, that we started to see,

0:34:12.080 --> 0:34:16.879
<v Speaker 1>you know, several religious mass delusions in in in continental

0:34:17.040 --> 0:34:21.239
<v Speaker 1>Europe starting around uh the year fifteen hundred or so.

0:34:21.600 --> 0:34:24.080
<v Speaker 1>The really interesting thing is why we didn't see all

0:34:24.120 --> 0:34:27.680
<v Speaker 1>that many manias with radio and television. And the answer

0:34:27.800 --> 0:34:31.600
<v Speaker 1>was they had built in filters, all right. Uh you know,

0:34:31.680 --> 0:34:36.120
<v Speaker 1>serious journalistic ethics. Walter Cronkite and you know Edward R.

0:34:36.200 --> 0:34:40.040
<v Speaker 1>Merrow tended not to lie to people, although Adolph Hitler

0:34:40.120 --> 0:34:43.080
<v Speaker 1>did and he certainly spread a mass delusion, and he

0:34:43.160 --> 0:34:47.200
<v Speaker 1>did it primarily with radio. That's interesting. You know, if

0:34:47.320 --> 0:34:50.719
<v Speaker 1>you look at the book pop why bubbles are great

0:34:50.760 --> 0:34:55.360
<v Speaker 1>for the economy. Dan gross goes over every time a

0:34:55.400 --> 0:34:59.680
<v Speaker 1>new technology comes out, if not a full blown bubble

0:35:00.080 --> 0:35:05.560
<v Speaker 1>than just a massive land Russian over investment misdeployment of

0:35:05.640 --> 0:35:12.719
<v Speaker 1>capital accompanied everything from railroads to radio, television, automobiles, even

0:35:12.760 --> 0:35:16.760
<v Speaker 1>fiber optics. You end up with this giant investment because

0:35:16.800 --> 0:35:20.040
<v Speaker 1>of a fear of missing the next big thing, and

0:35:20.520 --> 0:35:22.960
<v Speaker 1>it usually ends up with a handful of winners, but

0:35:23.200 --> 0:35:26.080
<v Speaker 1>most of the rest of the companies turn out to

0:35:26.080 --> 0:35:29.680
<v Speaker 1>be worthless. But it doesn't necessarily become a full blown

0:35:29.719 --> 0:35:34.040
<v Speaker 1>bubble across all of society. Yeah, that is that is

0:35:34.080 --> 0:35:38.160
<v Speaker 1>something that that's almost the constant of financial history. Is

0:35:38.200 --> 0:35:41.000
<v Speaker 1>there are technologies that really changed the world. I mean,

0:35:41.520 --> 0:35:45.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, um uh, the Internet really did change everything. Okay,

0:35:45.560 --> 0:35:49.200
<v Speaker 1>it's just that it didn't make the average investor who

0:35:49.200 --> 0:35:52.520
<v Speaker 1>invested in the tech companies of the late nineties wealthy.

0:35:53.120 --> 0:35:55.040
<v Speaker 1>The paradigm to that is something I write about in

0:35:55.040 --> 0:36:00.200
<v Speaker 1>the book which is Global Crossing Gary Linno Sperm, which was,

0:36:00.480 --> 0:36:04.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, a fiasco from a financial uh point of view.

0:36:04.920 --> 0:36:07.880
<v Speaker 1>But the man did build, you know, a large percentage

0:36:07.920 --> 0:36:12.080
<v Speaker 1>of the world's fiber optic capacity, and he didn't foresee

0:36:12.080 --> 0:36:14.920
<v Speaker 1>two things, not that he should have at least one

0:36:14.920 --> 0:36:16.960
<v Speaker 1>of which he should have foreseen, which was that you know,

0:36:17.000 --> 0:36:20.799
<v Speaker 1>there would be competing lines UH laid that would cut

0:36:20.840 --> 0:36:23.760
<v Speaker 1>into his profits. But the other thing which he didn't perceive,

0:36:23.840 --> 0:36:27.120
<v Speaker 1>and I don't think anyone really foresaw, was that the

0:36:27.200 --> 0:36:30.360
<v Speaker 1>improvement in dry plant, that is, the relays and the

0:36:30.400 --> 0:36:35.400
<v Speaker 1>transmitters and the receivers along the fiber aphic chains would

0:36:35.440 --> 0:36:39.000
<v Speaker 1>improve so dramatically that a fiber, the capacity of a

0:36:39.040 --> 0:36:44.640
<v Speaker 1>fiber to carry data UH would without changing the fiber

0:36:44.680 --> 0:36:48.040
<v Speaker 1>at all, would improve by orders of magnitude without laying

0:36:48.080 --> 0:36:50.759
<v Speaker 1>any new fibers. So between I don't know about two

0:36:50.840 --> 0:36:54.200
<v Speaker 1>thousand and two and two thousand and fifteen, there was

0:36:54.200 --> 0:36:58.280
<v Speaker 1>almost no fiber new fiber laid UH and yet the capacity,

0:36:58.360 --> 0:37:01.840
<v Speaker 1>the carrying capacity of the fiber up by about a thousandfold.

0:37:02.360 --> 0:37:08.400
<v Speaker 1>That's amazing. Arguably, global crossing bandwidth capacity is responsible for

0:37:09.239 --> 0:37:13.360
<v Speaker 1>everything from YouTube to Facebook that could not have existed

0:37:13.960 --> 0:37:18.120
<v Speaker 1>in in the pre fat pipe days. Yeah, the concept

0:37:18.120 --> 0:37:21.440
<v Speaker 1>that I talked about in the book is that technology

0:37:21.480 --> 0:37:27.320
<v Speaker 1>investors tend to be capitalism philanthropists. Okay, they tend to

0:37:27.560 --> 0:37:32.479
<v Speaker 1>put money into vitally needed infrastructure that benefits society at large,

0:37:32.520 --> 0:37:34.840
<v Speaker 1>but benefits all of us, whether it's the railroads, or

0:37:34.920 --> 0:37:40.759
<v Speaker 1>radio or television or aircraft manufacturer. But they don't make

0:37:40.800 --> 0:37:43.319
<v Speaker 1>any money in the process. They probably be better off,

0:37:43.320 --> 0:37:46.120
<v Speaker 1>as the old joke goes, uh, throwing half the money

0:37:46.120 --> 0:37:49.440
<v Speaker 1>out the window and burning the other half. So I

0:37:49.480 --> 0:37:52.280
<v Speaker 1>want to stick with the some of the eighteen century

0:37:52.320 --> 0:37:55.440
<v Speaker 1>bubbles you write about, the south Sea bubble and the

0:37:55.480 --> 0:38:00.320
<v Speaker 1>Mississippi Company bubble in Europe. One of the data points

0:38:00.360 --> 0:38:07.480
<v Speaker 1>just stunned me of eighteenth century European stock issuance occurred

0:38:07.560 --> 0:38:11.480
<v Speaker 1>in a single year, seventeen twenty. How on earth is

0:38:11.520 --> 0:38:16.480
<v Speaker 1>that even possible. Well, we saw that that was an

0:38:16.480 --> 0:38:19.560
<v Speaker 1>extreme example. I don't think we've seen anything quite like

0:38:19.640 --> 0:38:24.279
<v Speaker 1>it ever since. But certainly, you know, the the the

0:38:24.320 --> 0:38:28.320
<v Speaker 1>amount of I p o issuance of of new sheriffs

0:38:28.440 --> 0:38:33.000
<v Speaker 1>or in the new company births in the UH was

0:38:33.000 --> 0:38:35.960
<v Speaker 1>was a very similar phenomenon and left us with some

0:38:36.280 --> 0:38:38.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, companies that are very important today, prime among

0:38:38.640 --> 0:38:42.480
<v Speaker 1>which is Amazon. No con intended to say the least.

0:38:42.800 --> 0:38:45.640
<v Speaker 1>I also want to stick with the parallel you draw

0:38:45.960 --> 0:38:49.920
<v Speaker 1>from the south Sea Company and real estate. You mentioned

0:38:50.040 --> 0:38:54.359
<v Speaker 1>the Sassy Company was worth twice the value of all

0:38:54.400 --> 0:38:57.640
<v Speaker 1>of the lands in England, and we saw an echo

0:38:57.719 --> 0:39:01.320
<v Speaker 1>of that in the nineteen eighties thanks to the Tokyo

0:39:01.400 --> 0:39:07.080
<v Speaker 1>real estate bubble, when the Imperial Palace was worth more

0:39:07.120 --> 0:39:10.200
<v Speaker 1>than all of the land in California. What is it

0:39:10.360 --> 0:39:18.759
<v Speaker 1>about real estate that encourages this sort of interesting, bubblicious behavior. Well,

0:39:19.160 --> 0:39:21.200
<v Speaker 1>you have to go back a step and ask what

0:39:21.280 --> 0:39:25.880
<v Speaker 1>are the factors that underlie bubbles? Uh? And the biggest

0:39:25.880 --> 0:39:28.960
<v Speaker 1>factor of all, once you get past the new technology, is,

0:39:29.000 --> 0:39:33.080
<v Speaker 1>of course, the availability of easy credit. So invariably you

0:39:33.120 --> 0:39:40.640
<v Speaker 1>see bubbles in times of uh lowering gradually falling interest rates,

0:39:40.680 --> 0:39:45.880
<v Speaker 1>which certainly has some relevance today. UH. And what happens

0:39:46.000 --> 0:39:49.520
<v Speaker 1>is is the classic real estate bubble cycle, which is,

0:39:49.560 --> 0:39:52.600
<v Speaker 1>you buy a piece of real estate, Uh, it appreciates

0:39:52.600 --> 0:39:55.680
<v Speaker 1>and value that enables you to borrow more when you

0:39:55.760 --> 0:39:59.000
<v Speaker 1>collateralize it. UH. So you take that capital and you

0:39:59.040 --> 0:40:02.720
<v Speaker 1>buy more real estate. Uh. The prices continue to rise,

0:40:03.560 --> 0:40:05.800
<v Speaker 1>which enables you to borrow more and more. It becomes

0:40:05.840 --> 0:40:09.439
<v Speaker 1>a self inflating cycle until it finally blows up. That's

0:40:09.480 --> 0:40:12.520
<v Speaker 1>my favorite scene in the movie version of The Big Short,

0:40:13.280 --> 0:40:17.040
<v Speaker 1>where Steve Carrell is talking to I don't remember for

0:40:17.120 --> 0:40:20.320
<v Speaker 1>as a waitress or a stripper who owned a house

0:40:20.840 --> 0:40:24.600
<v Speaker 1>and was talking about how she financed it, and uh,

0:40:25.040 --> 0:40:27.040
<v Speaker 1>he asked her a question and her answer was, how

0:40:27.120 --> 0:40:29.200
<v Speaker 1>is this? He's like, you have more than one? She says,

0:40:29.239 --> 0:40:33.120
<v Speaker 1>I have five, And it's just that classic moment of Oh,

0:40:33.160 --> 0:40:36.240
<v Speaker 1>that's what people do with free money and lots of leverage.

0:40:36.560 --> 0:40:39.399
<v Speaker 1>They go out and try and uh, try and get

0:40:39.480 --> 0:40:42.959
<v Speaker 1>rich as quickly as they can. Yeah. My favorite story,

0:40:42.960 --> 0:40:44.279
<v Speaker 1>and I think it may have come from one of

0:40:44.320 --> 0:40:49.160
<v Speaker 1>your episodes, was when Dick Sailor did beside that scene

0:40:49.200 --> 0:40:53.080
<v Speaker 1>with two of the Jennifer Lopez uh, and it turned

0:40:53.400 --> 0:40:55.600
<v Speaker 1>and it turned out that Jennifer Lopez didn't know who

0:40:55.600 --> 0:40:57.760
<v Speaker 1>Dick Taylor was, and Dick Taylor didn't know who Jennifer

0:40:57.760 --> 0:41:01.160
<v Speaker 1>Lopez was. Was it j Lower? Was it Selena Gomez?

0:41:01.200 --> 0:41:04.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't remember, you know, I honestly don't know. Tells

0:41:04.600 --> 0:41:06.840
<v Speaker 1>you what generation I belong to. But the actress didn't

0:41:06.880 --> 0:41:10.719
<v Speaker 1>know who who whose failure was advice A person I

0:41:10.760 --> 0:41:14.400
<v Speaker 1>thought that was hilarious, to be fair, another person a

0:41:14.480 --> 0:41:17.920
<v Speaker 1>decade before they won their Nobel prize. So you know,

0:41:18.040 --> 0:41:21.319
<v Speaker 1>maybe maybe it was a you know to her just

0:41:21.360 --> 0:41:27.520
<v Speaker 1>an obscure economics professor toiling and obscurity in Chicago. There

0:41:27.560 --> 0:41:32.160
<v Speaker 1>there's a couple of really just fascinating digressions within the book.

0:41:33.000 --> 0:41:36.640
<v Speaker 1>I love this, this reference to some of Barry Iken

0:41:36.680 --> 0:41:40.440
<v Speaker 1>Green's work. He's an authority on the gold standard, and

0:41:40.600 --> 0:41:45.279
<v Speaker 1>his observation was that nations recovered from the Great Depression

0:41:45.840 --> 0:41:49.880
<v Speaker 1>in the precise order they abandoned hard money and a

0:41:49.960 --> 0:41:54.440
<v Speaker 1>currency backed by gold. I have never seen that precise quote.

0:41:55.080 --> 0:42:01.880
<v Speaker 1>How significant was hard money and gold to the basic

0:42:02.040 --> 0:42:06.640
<v Speaker 1>narrative and the delusion that gold was somehow special. Well,

0:42:07.200 --> 0:42:10.840
<v Speaker 1>in the first place, we get that to the the

0:42:10.880 --> 0:42:15.200
<v Speaker 1>Paris bubble of Mississippi company UH bubble, And that was

0:42:15.560 --> 0:42:19.000
<v Speaker 1>John Law's great innovation was he realized that hard money

0:42:20.480 --> 0:42:25.759
<v Speaker 1>was a drag on any company's economy UH and financial development.

0:42:25.800 --> 0:42:30.480
<v Speaker 1>And so he basically introduced paper currency UH to France,

0:42:30.520 --> 0:42:35.480
<v Speaker 1>and unfortunately he went he went overboard. But he's probably

0:42:35.600 --> 0:42:38.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think it's he's arguably the the father

0:42:39.200 --> 0:42:43.719
<v Speaker 1>of modern central banking and modern finance. He invented the

0:42:43.760 --> 0:42:46.120
<v Speaker 1>system that we have today. Just that he you know,

0:42:46.440 --> 0:42:50.560
<v Speaker 1>he and the Duke door Land or they all blew

0:42:50.560 --> 0:42:55.080
<v Speaker 1>it blew it up, so I can Green is of course,

0:42:55.120 --> 0:42:57.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, did the seminal research in this area. You're

0:42:57.480 --> 0:43:00.840
<v Speaker 1>talking about a book called Golden Setters U and the

0:43:00.880 --> 0:43:06.000
<v Speaker 1>research behind it. When you ever you hear the mainstream economist, uh,

0:43:06.040 --> 0:43:09.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, gag when you mentioned the gold standard. Uh,

0:43:09.560 --> 0:43:13.000
<v Speaker 1>it's Barry I can Green there channeling and and his work.

0:43:13.440 --> 0:43:16.240
<v Speaker 1>My favorite trope of the gold bug is that gold

0:43:16.239 --> 0:43:19.439
<v Speaker 1>has been money for five thousand years. It certainly has

0:43:19.520 --> 0:43:23.319
<v Speaker 1>not been money for five thousand years. The money, you know,

0:43:23.400 --> 0:43:26.480
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't started to be used as money until the

0:43:26.480 --> 0:43:31.200
<v Speaker 1>Hellenistic period. Uh in in Greece, which was not much

0:43:31.200 --> 0:43:34.680
<v Speaker 1>more than two thousand years ago. And before that, lack

0:43:34.800 --> 0:43:36.680
<v Speaker 1>of things were money. You know, a leader of grain

0:43:36.800 --> 0:43:40.000
<v Speaker 1>was money, ahead of cattle was money. Uh. If you

0:43:40.040 --> 0:43:43.080
<v Speaker 1>wanted something that looked more like hard money back in

0:43:43.120 --> 0:43:46.120
<v Speaker 1>the ancient world, silver was was the real hard money

0:43:46.160 --> 0:43:48.719
<v Speaker 1>at that error, it wasn't gold. Yeah, it's going to

0:43:48.760 --> 0:43:51.759
<v Speaker 1>be curious to see what happens to the goldbubs when

0:43:51.760 --> 0:43:55.640
<v Speaker 1>we um last. So some asteroid with you know, a

0:43:55.719 --> 0:43:59.200
<v Speaker 1>billion metric tons of gold and platinum in it, it

0:43:59.480 --> 0:44:03.200
<v Speaker 1>might change the belief and hard hard money There's another

0:44:03.520 --> 0:44:07.200
<v Speaker 1>issue we really didn't get to, which is the overwhelming

0:44:07.200 --> 0:44:11.440
<v Speaker 1>proclivity of human beings to imitate the behavior of of

0:44:11.480 --> 0:44:15.320
<v Speaker 1>those around them, regardless of how baseless or self destructive

0:44:15.360 --> 0:44:21.520
<v Speaker 1>that behavior. Maybe what's behind our propensity for imitation? Well,

0:44:21.560 --> 0:44:24.000
<v Speaker 1>in the first place, we really haven't talked about this.

0:44:24.239 --> 0:44:28.600
<v Speaker 1>When you ask what is the primary uh psychological mechanism

0:44:28.760 --> 0:44:33.800
<v Speaker 1>of manias, it's our proclivity to imitate U from something

0:44:33.840 --> 0:44:36.759
<v Speaker 1>as basic as just yawning. It's why yawning is infectious.

0:44:37.080 --> 0:44:39.640
<v Speaker 1>And the infectiousness of yawning is something that's actually been

0:44:39.680 --> 0:44:42.279
<v Speaker 1>studied in some detail, and I won't get into how

0:44:42.320 --> 0:44:45.719
<v Speaker 1>interesting it is, but trust me, yawning is is very

0:44:45.800 --> 0:44:50.560
<v Speaker 1>very interesting. But what is behind that is something that's

0:44:50.640 --> 0:44:54.719
<v Speaker 1>that's very simple, and that's the paradigm of thinking of

0:44:55.000 --> 0:44:59.000
<v Speaker 1>the human occupation of the New World North and South America,

0:44:59.040 --> 0:45:03.560
<v Speaker 1>which began some around fifteen twenty thousand uh years ago,

0:45:03.920 --> 0:45:08.200
<v Speaker 1>and within the space of several thousand years, human kind

0:45:08.400 --> 0:45:13.000
<v Speaker 1>spread from the frozen Arctic wastes down through the North

0:45:13.040 --> 0:45:16.719
<v Speaker 1>American continent and into South America and the Andy's and

0:45:16.800 --> 0:45:19.440
<v Speaker 1>all the way down to the Tierra del Fuego. And

0:45:19.480 --> 0:45:22.160
<v Speaker 1>along the way human beings had to learn how to

0:45:22.200 --> 0:45:27.040
<v Speaker 1>make kayaks uh and how to hunt bison and how

0:45:27.080 --> 0:45:30.360
<v Speaker 1>to make poison blow darts, and all of those endeavors

0:45:30.400 --> 0:45:33.200
<v Speaker 1>are very complex, they're very hard to learn, and no

0:45:33.400 --> 0:45:35.880
<v Speaker 1>one person is going to figure out how to do

0:45:35.960 --> 0:45:39.239
<v Speaker 1>it well on their own. And so the way that

0:45:39.800 --> 0:45:42.200
<v Speaker 1>you will survive, in the way your tribe will survive,

0:45:42.560 --> 0:45:45.799
<v Speaker 1>is if you're very good at imitating. You know, if

0:45:45.920 --> 0:45:48.000
<v Speaker 1>Joe and his friends figure out how to build a

0:45:48.080 --> 0:45:52.440
<v Speaker 1>kayak from from scratched and rather than figure it out yourself,

0:45:52.480 --> 0:45:55.760
<v Speaker 1>you're going to imitate that, all right. So the ability

0:45:55.800 --> 0:45:59.880
<v Speaker 1>to imitate carries enormous sur value of value not only

0:46:00.000 --> 0:46:05.880
<v Speaker 1>for individuals, but for entire societies as well. And unfortunately,

0:46:06.120 --> 0:46:11.120
<v Speaker 1>it's a good deal more dysfunctional uh in the in

0:46:11.400 --> 0:46:14.480
<v Speaker 1>the modern world, because that ability to imitate carries with

0:46:14.560 --> 0:46:18.880
<v Speaker 1>it the proclivity to nnias and the proclivity of nnias

0:46:19.080 --> 0:46:22.600
<v Speaker 1>It may not be that dangerous in the in a

0:46:22.640 --> 0:46:25.280
<v Speaker 1>state of nature, but in a world of social media,

0:46:25.320 --> 0:46:30.040
<v Speaker 1>it's deadly interesting. So, you know, we we briefly touched

0:46:30.080 --> 0:46:34.839
<v Speaker 1>on on some of the evolutionary adaptations that work so

0:46:34.920 --> 0:46:39.239
<v Speaker 1>well on the Savannah, but hurt us um in modern times.

0:46:40.040 --> 0:46:44.680
<v Speaker 1>What is some of the anthropology behind this? Why are

0:46:44.760 --> 0:46:49.920
<v Speaker 1>we simply status seeking, narrative believing imitators. Give us a

0:46:50.000 --> 0:46:53.680
<v Speaker 1>little more background about some of the academic work that

0:46:53.680 --> 0:46:59.759
<v Speaker 1>that's been done in this space. Well, the narrative proclivity

0:47:00.120 --> 0:47:03.840
<v Speaker 1>is something that you think about. It is fairly obvious,

0:47:03.920 --> 0:47:07.560
<v Speaker 1>which is that when you and your your colleagues fifteen

0:47:07.560 --> 0:47:11.240
<v Speaker 1>thousand years ago went out to hunt wily wily mammoth,

0:47:11.320 --> 0:47:14.680
<v Speaker 1>you didn't issue mathematical vectors to each other. That's not

0:47:14.719 --> 0:47:17.200
<v Speaker 1>the way the human mind works. We use We use

0:47:17.239 --> 0:47:21.799
<v Speaker 1>our left hemisphere seric ability to communicate with words. So

0:47:21.920 --> 0:47:24.399
<v Speaker 1>you know, Joe, you go left, Fred you go right,

0:47:24.960 --> 0:47:29.399
<v Speaker 1>and you'll both spear the mathodon from both sides. That's

0:47:29.520 --> 0:47:32.600
<v Speaker 1>that's how we communicate with each other UH. And that's

0:47:32.640 --> 0:47:35.480
<v Speaker 1>how we transmit our values. We don't do it mathematically

0:47:35.560 --> 0:47:39.520
<v Speaker 1>or with analytical UH rigor. And the example of that

0:47:39.680 --> 0:47:43.000
<v Speaker 1>that I use in the book was very early in

0:47:43.040 --> 0:47:47.080
<v Speaker 1>the UH the Republican nominating process in late two thousand

0:47:47.160 --> 0:47:50.800
<v Speaker 1>and fifteen, when you know, the Republicans had these enormous

0:47:51.040 --> 0:47:54.960
<v Speaker 1>UH primary UH debates and you know, no one no

0:47:55.080 --> 0:48:00.200
<v Speaker 1>one took Donald Trump seriously. Someone asked Ben Carson, who,

0:48:00.239 --> 0:48:04.200
<v Speaker 1>for whatever you think of him, was a very famous neurosurgeon. Uh.

0:48:04.239 --> 0:48:06.040
<v Speaker 1>And they asked him what he thought of vaccination, and

0:48:06.080 --> 0:48:09.200
<v Speaker 1>he thought the science and back of it was pretty

0:48:09.200 --> 0:48:12.400
<v Speaker 1>far many, you know, gave the typical Republican answer, which was,

0:48:12.440 --> 0:48:13.799
<v Speaker 1>but you know, no one's going to force you to

0:48:13.800 --> 0:48:15.840
<v Speaker 1>take you know, I don't want anybody to be forced

0:48:15.840 --> 0:48:19.839
<v Speaker 1>to take a vaccination. Uh. And Donald Trump interrupted him

0:48:20.360 --> 0:48:22.600
<v Speaker 1>and said, I had an employed you who had a

0:48:22.680 --> 0:48:26.200
<v Speaker 1>daughter who's got vaccinated, a beautiful child. This was a

0:48:26.200 --> 0:48:30.120
<v Speaker 1>beautiful child and she developed autism. It's an epidemic. I

0:48:30.200 --> 0:48:33.560
<v Speaker 1>tell you, it's an epidemic. And he knew exactly what

0:48:33.600 --> 0:48:36.239
<v Speaker 1>he was doing. Uh. He knew that. You know, Ben

0:48:36.280 --> 0:48:41.200
<v Speaker 1>Carson's data were nothing compared to his narratives. All right,

0:48:41.680 --> 0:48:44.040
<v Speaker 1>So that's why you know, that's that's an example of

0:48:44.080 --> 0:48:49.279
<v Speaker 1>the importance of of narratives. Now status thinking again, Uh,

0:48:49.600 --> 0:48:55.160
<v Speaker 1>is is something that has to do with with sexual selection. Uh.

0:48:55.200 --> 0:48:58.200
<v Speaker 1>If you're a female and you're looking for a mate,

0:48:58.600 --> 0:49:01.440
<v Speaker 1>your major concern is passing on your d N A.

0:49:01.560 --> 0:49:04.480
<v Speaker 1>And the way your DNA gets passed on is if

0:49:04.560 --> 0:49:07.759
<v Speaker 1>you and your progeny are well provided for all right,

0:49:08.200 --> 0:49:11.279
<v Speaker 1>and your your progeny will be well provided for. If

0:49:11.400 --> 0:49:14.840
<v Speaker 1>your mate, uh, if the father of the children U

0:49:15.280 --> 0:49:18.480
<v Speaker 1>is a mocker, You someone who can bring home the

0:49:18.600 --> 0:49:21.480
<v Speaker 1>meat and command other people. If you don't, you're not

0:49:21.480 --> 0:49:24.640
<v Speaker 1>going to take a weekly because if you take a weekly, uh,

0:49:24.880 --> 0:49:27.560
<v Speaker 1>then that that person, that man will not provide for

0:49:27.600 --> 0:49:30.200
<v Speaker 1>you and your children. And you are less likely to

0:49:30.719 --> 0:49:34.759
<v Speaker 1>pass your your June's on. And we see it today. Uh.

0:49:34.840 --> 0:49:37.360
<v Speaker 1>You know in society today are a lot more likely

0:49:37.400 --> 0:49:39.359
<v Speaker 1>to pass your jeans on if you're a rock star

0:49:39.920 --> 0:49:44.359
<v Speaker 1>or athlete, then you know, if you're someone who didn't

0:49:44.400 --> 0:49:48.360
<v Speaker 1>graduate high school and can't jump. Interesting, So let's go

0:49:48.560 --> 0:49:52.319
<v Speaker 1>to our favorite questions that we ask all of our guests,

0:49:52.400 --> 0:49:55.440
<v Speaker 1>starting with what are you streaming these days? Give us

0:49:55.480 --> 0:50:00.319
<v Speaker 1>your favorite Netflix podcast, Amazon Prime? What what's keeping you

0:50:00.440 --> 0:50:04.920
<v Speaker 1>entertained during a lockdown? Well, I'm afraid I'm not much

0:50:05.040 --> 0:50:09.080
<v Speaker 1>unpopular culture. That the the the series that we're into

0:50:09.200 --> 0:50:13.640
<v Speaker 1>right now, uh is Green Leaf, which is about a

0:50:13.640 --> 0:50:18.120
<v Speaker 1>African American evangelical church, and it's just it's just a

0:50:18.120 --> 0:50:21.200
<v Speaker 1>great soap opera. The acting, it's spectacular, the move the

0:50:21.280 --> 0:50:26.080
<v Speaker 1>music is is fantastic, This cinematography is is you know,

0:50:26.239 --> 0:50:29.160
<v Speaker 1>is Amy class. I mean, it's just absolutely a spectacular

0:50:29.200 --> 0:50:32.319
<v Speaker 1>series and best of all, as sixty five episodes, so

0:50:32.520 --> 0:50:36.680
<v Speaker 1>it'll keep you occupied for for a while. And you know,

0:50:36.719 --> 0:50:39.439
<v Speaker 1>like everybody else's my ilk, I'm waiting for the next

0:50:39.440 --> 0:50:45.120
<v Speaker 1>season of Succession and better call Saul and Ozark. Uh.

0:50:45.160 --> 0:50:50.399
<v Speaker 1>As far as podcast, uh go, I'm afraid that most

0:50:50.440 --> 0:50:53.680
<v Speaker 1>of my reading bandwidth and my podcast Bandwich gets taken

0:50:53.719 --> 0:50:56.920
<v Speaker 1>up by the Economist, and it's almost overkill to do

0:50:57.040 --> 0:50:59.560
<v Speaker 1>both of those with the Economists. But the thing you

0:50:59.600 --> 0:51:02.680
<v Speaker 1>get from Economists podcast that you don't get from reading

0:51:02.680 --> 0:51:05.560
<v Speaker 1>the magazine is the flavor of just how smart and

0:51:05.600 --> 0:51:07.920
<v Speaker 1>funny these people are. And you have to put names

0:51:07.960 --> 0:51:10.920
<v Speaker 1>on them too. Of course, you know the the the

0:51:10.920 --> 0:51:14.719
<v Speaker 1>the Economist doesn't have bylines, so you actually get to

0:51:14.800 --> 0:51:17.960
<v Speaker 1>listen to the people who hear about who excuse me,

0:51:18.000 --> 0:51:19.960
<v Speaker 1>you get to listen to people who are writing the articles,

0:51:19.960 --> 0:51:23.920
<v Speaker 1>and that is marvelously entertaining. I love Silent Money, I

0:51:23.960 --> 0:51:28.719
<v Speaker 1>love your shows. Uh And and of course On the

0:51:28.800 --> 0:51:32.640
<v Speaker 1>Media is another series that's very, very smart. I also

0:51:32.760 --> 0:51:36.319
<v Speaker 1>like uh The New Yorker just because I simply can't

0:51:36.320 --> 0:51:41.239
<v Speaker 1>get enough of David Remnick. He's certainly amusing. Uh. Let's

0:51:41.280 --> 0:51:44.840
<v Speaker 1>talk about some mentors. Who are the people who influenced

0:51:45.320 --> 0:51:49.839
<v Speaker 1>your thought process, your philosophy, your career well. First of all,

0:51:49.920 --> 0:51:52.880
<v Speaker 1>career wise, I have to give credit to two people

0:51:53.320 --> 0:51:57.600
<v Speaker 1>who most people haven't heard of. One of whom is

0:51:57.960 --> 0:52:02.560
<v Speaker 1>um Scott Burns, who wrote finance for the Dallas Morning

0:52:02.760 --> 0:52:06.520
<v Speaker 1>uh news. Uh. He's not your typical personal finance writer.

0:52:06.640 --> 0:52:11.319
<v Speaker 1>He went to uh M I p uh and then

0:52:11.400 --> 0:52:14.000
<v Speaker 1>he would go over Harvard Harvard to take writing lessons

0:52:14.000 --> 0:52:17.560
<v Speaker 1>from Archibald Mcalish uh. And he was the first person

0:52:17.640 --> 0:52:22.160
<v Speaker 1>who who basically encouraged me and told me that very

0:52:22.200 --> 0:52:24.400
<v Speaker 1>few people had the ability both to do the mass

0:52:24.400 --> 0:52:26.799
<v Speaker 1>and right well. And if I had that ability, and

0:52:26.840 --> 0:52:29.880
<v Speaker 1>he thought I did, I should be encouraged to do it.

0:52:29.920 --> 0:52:32.200
<v Speaker 1>And I was, you know, very discouraged at that point

0:52:32.200 --> 0:52:34.440
<v Speaker 1>in my career. So he gave me the impetus. And

0:52:34.480 --> 0:52:37.440
<v Speaker 1>the other person and someone who's even more obscure financial advisor, right,

0:52:37.440 --> 0:52:40.160
<v Speaker 1>and the Frank Armstrong, who was the right first person

0:52:40.200 --> 0:52:42.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm aware of to put a finance book on the web,

0:52:43.160 --> 0:52:45.759
<v Speaker 1>investing for the twentieth century or investing for the twenty

0:52:45.800 --> 0:52:48.160
<v Speaker 1>first century. I think he had two different editions, and

0:52:48.200 --> 0:52:49.920
<v Speaker 1>he was the one who told me to put my

0:52:50.040 --> 0:52:54.160
<v Speaker 1>book The Intelligent Asset Allocator on the web, which jump

0:52:54.200 --> 0:52:57.440
<v Speaker 1>started my writing career. Now, as far as investing goes,

0:52:57.640 --> 0:53:00.239
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's the usual suspects, Um, it's it's going

0:53:00.320 --> 0:53:02.560
<v Speaker 1>to be Jack Burgel. So I did have some personal

0:53:02.600 --> 0:53:05.560
<v Speaker 1>contact with and of course Farmer and French, who had

0:53:05.640 --> 0:53:09.960
<v Speaker 1>almost no personal contact with, who were my intellectual mentors,

0:53:10.000 --> 0:53:11.520
<v Speaker 1>and then they were the people who have helped me

0:53:11.560 --> 0:53:15.160
<v Speaker 1>along in my career, prime among which are John Raiken,

0:53:15.239 --> 0:53:19.880
<v Speaker 1>Pauler at Morning Star, and Jonathan Clements at the at

0:53:19.920 --> 0:53:23.719
<v Speaker 1>the Journal. And then he was succeeded by Jason's Wide,

0:53:24.280 --> 0:53:26.520
<v Speaker 1>who is someone that I derived a great deal of

0:53:26.760 --> 0:53:31.520
<v Speaker 1>uh personal inspiration from as well. That's a great list.

0:53:32.120 --> 0:53:34.680
<v Speaker 1>Let's talk about some of your favorite books and and

0:53:35.080 --> 0:53:38.440
<v Speaker 1>what you're reading right now. Okay, Well, the two favorite

0:53:38.440 --> 0:53:41.320
<v Speaker 1>books that I always mentioned to everybody are Expert Political

0:53:41.360 --> 0:53:46.600
<v Speaker 1>Judgment by philth Catlock, which talks about just how difficult

0:53:46.840 --> 0:53:50.799
<v Speaker 1>it is uh to forecast well, how poorly people do

0:53:51.280 --> 0:53:56.200
<v Speaker 1>at and particularly the characteristics of poor forecasters. Which is

0:53:56.719 --> 0:53:58.880
<v Speaker 1>which is immensely valuable since that turns out to me

0:53:58.960 --> 0:54:01.760
<v Speaker 1>most of the people on EV And he explains exactly

0:54:01.760 --> 0:54:05.000
<v Speaker 1>why people on TV UH talking heads tend to be

0:54:05.160 --> 0:54:10.279
<v Speaker 1>miserable UH forecasters and identifies in fact that they that

0:54:10.440 --> 0:54:13.400
<v Speaker 1>they that they are. UH. The other book that I recommend,

0:54:13.400 --> 0:54:15.600
<v Speaker 1>it's kind of a grim book and it seems irrelevant

0:54:15.600 --> 0:54:19.160
<v Speaker 1>to finance, but I think it's just so very important,

0:54:19.440 --> 0:54:23.399
<v Speaker 1>which is Lawrence Reaves's History of Ashwitz Ashwitz New History.

0:54:23.440 --> 0:54:25.520
<v Speaker 1>And it was a history of Ashwitz from the perspective

0:54:25.960 --> 0:54:29.440
<v Speaker 1>of the camp personnel. UH. And the bottom line is,

0:54:29.440 --> 0:54:34.640
<v Speaker 1>if you can understand how very ordinary Germans became mass murderers,

0:54:34.920 --> 0:54:38.919
<v Speaker 1>then you can certainly understand Enron UH and world com

0:54:39.000 --> 0:54:44.000
<v Speaker 1>and and we work all right, uh and and it's

0:54:44.040 --> 0:54:46.239
<v Speaker 1>it's just a very important for people in finance if

0:54:46.280 --> 0:54:49.000
<v Speaker 1>you can make that jump. Now. The book that I'm

0:54:49.000 --> 0:54:50.880
<v Speaker 1>reading right now and not even done with it, but

0:54:51.040 --> 0:54:53.760
<v Speaker 1>it's one of the most brilliant books I've ever read,

0:54:54.200 --> 0:54:57.560
<v Speaker 1>is a book called The Weirdest People in the World. UH.

0:54:57.719 --> 0:55:01.080
<v Speaker 1>Weird is an acreneym W I l D, which stands

0:55:01.080 --> 0:55:07.560
<v Speaker 1>for Western educated, UH, Industrialized, rich and Democratic, which is

0:55:07.560 --> 0:55:10.520
<v Speaker 1>all of Western society. And it's a book, first of all,

0:55:10.560 --> 0:55:13.560
<v Speaker 1>about how unusual we are. It's a book by man

0:55:13.560 --> 0:55:17.320
<v Speaker 1>by Joseph Henrick, who is an interesting guy in himself,

0:55:17.320 --> 0:55:20.000
<v Speaker 1>which I'll get to in in a minute. And he

0:55:20.040 --> 0:55:23.800
<v Speaker 1>has this bizarre thesis which you know, strikes most people

0:55:23.920 --> 0:55:25.880
<v Speaker 1>is outrageous, and if the reason why the book is

0:55:26.080 --> 0:55:29.080
<v Speaker 1>more widely read than it is. And the thesis is

0:55:29.120 --> 0:55:31.560
<v Speaker 1>that we are who we are in Western society and

0:55:31.560 --> 0:55:35.760
<v Speaker 1>we're rich the way we are because, uh, the Church

0:55:35.920 --> 0:55:40.839
<v Speaker 1>forbade cousin marriage, which seems like a really weird hypothesis

0:55:41.080 --> 0:55:44.440
<v Speaker 1>until he explains it to you. And then he goes

0:55:44.480 --> 0:55:46.839
<v Speaker 1>into the data and back of it, which is just

0:55:46.960 --> 0:55:51.040
<v Speaker 1>absolutely steel trapped. Uh. He brings an enormous amount of

0:55:51.400 --> 0:55:56.040
<v Speaker 1>data from anthropology and social psychology, uh, to bear on it,

0:55:56.239 --> 0:55:59.879
<v Speaker 1>and he makes an extremely convincing case. Uh. And it's

0:56:00.200 --> 0:56:03.239
<v Speaker 1>just that the the you know, the Church forbade the

0:56:03.280 --> 0:56:06.359
<v Speaker 1>marriage of first cousins. They forbade the marriage of even

0:56:06.440 --> 0:56:09.400
<v Speaker 1>fifth cousins in some instances. And if you can't marry

0:56:09.440 --> 0:56:11.560
<v Speaker 1>your fifth cousin basically means you have to get out

0:56:11.560 --> 0:56:15.040
<v Speaker 1>of town to find a mate. And what that does

0:56:15.680 --> 0:56:18.920
<v Speaker 1>is it greatly increases your radius of trust. Okay, you

0:56:18.960 --> 0:56:22.880
<v Speaker 1>start trusting people who are outside your immediate family and tribe,

0:56:23.320 --> 0:56:28.640
<v Speaker 1>and that is the essential characteristic of the wealthiest modern society.

0:56:28.680 --> 0:56:32.440
<v Speaker 1>The reason why the dames in the Norwegians, uh and

0:56:32.480 --> 0:56:36.520
<v Speaker 1>the Germans do so well is because they trust strangers,

0:56:36.800 --> 0:56:38.719
<v Speaker 1>all right. And if you look at the places in

0:56:38.760 --> 0:56:42.719
<v Speaker 1>the world that don't do well, that have poor poor

0:56:42.760 --> 0:56:46.640
<v Speaker 1>economies and poor politics and poor institutions, its societies with

0:56:46.880 --> 0:56:49.200
<v Speaker 1>very low radius of trust. So, for example, it's the

0:56:49.239 --> 0:56:52.640
<v Speaker 1>difference between northern and southern Italy. The radius of trust

0:56:52.640 --> 0:56:55.600
<v Speaker 1>in northern Italy is very high. The radius of trust

0:56:55.800 --> 0:57:00.000
<v Speaker 1>in in um In uh sard in Italy is very

0:57:00.120 --> 0:57:03.600
<v Speaker 1>very low, and something that sociologists have known about for years,

0:57:03.640 --> 0:57:06.879
<v Speaker 1>for decades. So it's it's a book that explains all that,

0:57:07.200 --> 0:57:10.120
<v Speaker 1>and it's it's just, uh, it's an amazing read and

0:57:10.200 --> 0:57:13.840
<v Speaker 1>I can't recommend the book highly enough. Interesting, you mentioned

0:57:13.840 --> 0:57:16.560
<v Speaker 1>he has an unusual background. He didn't start act with

0:57:16.640 --> 0:57:21.600
<v Speaker 1>the usual four star you know, academic background. He started

0:57:21.600 --> 0:57:23.800
<v Speaker 1>out as an aerospace engineer, I think at a state

0:57:23.880 --> 0:57:27.480
<v Speaker 1>university somewhere, but he's been a minor in anthropology and

0:57:27.520 --> 0:57:30.160
<v Speaker 1>after working in aerospace for a while, and you look

0:57:30.160 --> 0:57:32.720
<v Speaker 1>at his pictures and he looks like your typical aerospace engineer,

0:57:32.800 --> 0:57:35.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, with the find horns and glasses. He doesn't

0:57:35.600 --> 0:57:38.919
<v Speaker 1>have a pocket protector, but he should have one. Uh

0:57:39.040 --> 0:57:42.920
<v Speaker 1>and uh. And he starts doing He gets a PhD

0:57:42.920 --> 0:57:46.240
<v Speaker 1>in anthropology, and he starts doing his research. And the

0:57:46.280 --> 0:57:50.680
<v Speaker 1>research is so so remarkably good that he just gradually

0:57:50.680 --> 0:57:55.040
<v Speaker 1>ascends the academic um uh ladder. First the University of

0:57:55.040 --> 0:57:58.960
<v Speaker 1>British Columbia, and now he's gotten endowed share of anthropology

0:57:59.080 --> 0:58:05.200
<v Speaker 1>at Harvard and this enormous team of multidiscipcenary researchers in

0:58:05.520 --> 0:58:11.480
<v Speaker 1>under him, you know, psychologists and economists, uh and social psychologists,

0:58:11.560 --> 0:58:15.919
<v Speaker 1>and his his work is just absolutely brilliant. Once once

0:58:15.960 --> 0:58:18.800
<v Speaker 1>you start reading the book, if you're academically inclined, that

0:58:18.920 --> 0:58:21.320
<v Speaker 1>you'll get lost in the thicket of his references because

0:58:21.320 --> 0:58:24.880
<v Speaker 1>the references are so fascinating. So he's another left brain

0:58:25.000 --> 0:58:29.160
<v Speaker 1>right brain person who could do both the math and

0:58:29.280 --> 0:58:32.960
<v Speaker 1>the narrative side. Yes, you're going to have a mentioned

0:58:32.960 --> 0:58:35.840
<v Speaker 1>is fact. He also writes very well, right, you're another

0:58:35.840 --> 0:58:38.760
<v Speaker 1>one of those people who have the ability to deal

0:58:38.800 --> 0:58:43.280
<v Speaker 1>with the underlying mathematics and the language side. And that's

0:58:43.280 --> 0:58:47.920
<v Speaker 1>a relatively rare combination of skills. Shucks, belly, I'm just

0:58:47.960 --> 0:58:52.200
<v Speaker 1>a simple country neurologist. That's right. Let's get to our

0:58:52.320 --> 0:58:56.080
<v Speaker 1>last two questions. What sort of advice would you give

0:58:56.120 --> 0:59:00.560
<v Speaker 1>to a recent college graduate who was interested in career

0:59:00.880 --> 0:59:08.640
<v Speaker 1>in either neurology, investing, or writing. Well, the usual admonission

0:59:08.760 --> 0:59:13.680
<v Speaker 1>to follow your bliss uh is just awful advice. Um.

0:59:13.720 --> 0:59:16.080
<v Speaker 1>You know, my favorite of my favorite New Yorker cartoons

0:59:16.520 --> 0:59:18.920
<v Speaker 1>is the typical cartoon where they have a guy with

0:59:19.280 --> 0:59:22.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, sitting on the street and shambles with a

0:59:22.280 --> 0:59:23.840
<v Speaker 1>with a with a hat in front of them, and

0:59:23.920 --> 0:59:27.400
<v Speaker 1>his sign says, followed my bliss. Uh. You know you

0:59:27.720 --> 0:59:30.479
<v Speaker 1>have to you have to make a living. Uh. And

0:59:31.560 --> 0:59:33.480
<v Speaker 1>the best thing you can do is to melt those

0:59:33.520 --> 0:59:35.560
<v Speaker 1>two things. You shouldn't. You shouldn't take a job if

0:59:35.600 --> 0:59:38.760
<v Speaker 1>you despise just to make money. But on the other hand,

0:59:39.120 --> 0:59:42.480
<v Speaker 1>you know you shouldn't get a degree in ethno musicology

0:59:43.400 --> 0:59:47.080
<v Speaker 1>as well and expect to have a happy existence. Uh.

0:59:47.360 --> 0:59:50.080
<v Speaker 1>You know you need to to have a decent standard

0:59:50.120 --> 0:59:52.480
<v Speaker 1>of living. You need to provide for your family, and

0:59:52.520 --> 0:59:54.640
<v Speaker 1>you need to save up so that if you ever

0:59:54.680 --> 0:59:56.920
<v Speaker 1>get sick of your job, you can follow your bliss

0:59:56.920 --> 0:59:58.840
<v Speaker 1>at that point and I have to worry about your

0:59:58.840 --> 1:00:01.520
<v Speaker 1>next your net to meal. And the best part of

1:00:01.560 --> 1:00:05.120
<v Speaker 1>doing that is if you can wind up with reasonable

1:00:05.160 --> 1:00:08.160
<v Speaker 1>savings at age forty or fifty, you don't have to

1:00:08.160 --> 1:00:09.840
<v Speaker 1>worry about what to do with the last twenty or

1:00:09.880 --> 1:00:11.600
<v Speaker 1>thirty years of your life because you'll have whole in

1:00:11.680 --> 1:00:14.440
<v Speaker 1>your careers in front of you and usibly things that

1:00:14.480 --> 1:00:18.560
<v Speaker 1>you genuinely enjoy doing. So don't follow your bliss, don't

1:00:18.600 --> 1:00:20.600
<v Speaker 1>take a job just for the money. Try and mel

1:00:20.680 --> 1:00:23.680
<v Speaker 1>those through things intelligently and balanced them off. I have

1:00:23.800 --> 1:00:27.600
<v Speaker 1>to ask, since you you referenced, what what's your take

1:00:27.720 --> 1:00:33.480
<v Speaker 1>on the whole early retirement fire community that that seems

1:00:33.520 --> 1:00:37.880
<v Speaker 1>to believe you can save enough money and tap out

1:00:38.040 --> 1:00:41.520
<v Speaker 1>at in your thirties or forties. Oh, it's a great idea,

1:00:41.640 --> 1:00:45.680
<v Speaker 1>as long as you don't get sicker have kids. So

1:00:46.280 --> 1:00:49.760
<v Speaker 1>not a fan, let me uh, I think I think

1:00:49.760 --> 1:00:53.640
<v Speaker 1>the hardest in the right place. I think they're a

1:00:53.640 --> 1:00:56.880
<v Speaker 1>little delusional, and of course they also ignore you know,

1:00:56.840 --> 1:00:59.240
<v Speaker 1>about the realities of life. And I think they also

1:00:59.440 --> 1:01:02.640
<v Speaker 1>ignore Uh, you know, what do you do with your

1:01:02.680 --> 1:01:04.560
<v Speaker 1>life when you go to the beach at age thirty

1:01:04.640 --> 1:01:07.560
<v Speaker 1>or forty? You better have something worthwhile that you want

1:01:07.560 --> 1:01:09.840
<v Speaker 1>to do with your life. You better have a mission

1:01:09.840 --> 1:01:12.640
<v Speaker 1>in life, because if you're don't, you're going to wind

1:01:12.720 --> 1:01:16.280
<v Speaker 1>up coffering from industrial grade on the way. I don't

1:01:16.280 --> 1:01:17.800
<v Speaker 1>want to trash them too much. I mean, I like

1:01:17.920 --> 1:01:20.400
<v Speaker 1>these people, and I think that their message for our

1:01:20.400 --> 1:01:23.840
<v Speaker 1>society that we live in a corrosive consumer culture that

1:01:23.920 --> 1:01:26.320
<v Speaker 1>has to be resisted and you should keep your living

1:01:26.360 --> 1:01:30.680
<v Speaker 1>expenses down, is certainly a very salutary message. Fair enough,

1:01:30.840 --> 1:01:33.480
<v Speaker 1>And our final question, what do you know about the

1:01:33.520 --> 1:01:37.200
<v Speaker 1>world of investing today that you wish you knew thirty

1:01:37.240 --> 1:01:40.720
<v Speaker 1>plus years ago or so when you were first getting

1:01:40.760 --> 1:01:45.080
<v Speaker 1>started in finance. Well, you know, academics like to play

1:01:45.080 --> 1:01:51.160
<v Speaker 1>this parlor game of do equities become riskier? Uh? You know,

1:01:51.680 --> 1:01:55.280
<v Speaker 1>over over less riskier, more risky over over time? And

1:01:55.520 --> 1:01:57.800
<v Speaker 1>there are an instant both sides that most academ missions

1:01:57.800 --> 1:02:00.240
<v Speaker 1>will tell you that they become riskier with time. But

1:02:00.400 --> 1:02:05.280
<v Speaker 1>what I only fully understood, you know, after until after

1:02:05.320 --> 1:02:07.720
<v Speaker 1>doing it. I didn't understand until after doing finance for

1:02:07.760 --> 1:02:09.920
<v Speaker 1>a couple of decades, was that that's kind of a

1:02:09.920 --> 1:02:13.680
<v Speaker 1>silly question. Uh. The real question is how risky are

1:02:13.960 --> 1:02:18.280
<v Speaker 1>stocks at a given stage in your life cycle? Uh.

1:02:18.320 --> 1:02:21.280
<v Speaker 1>And so if you are retired and you don't have

1:02:21.320 --> 1:02:25.560
<v Speaker 1>any human capital left, then stocks are three mile Island

1:02:25.960 --> 1:02:30.720
<v Speaker 1>chernewbyl toxic. They're very dangerous because you know, if you

1:02:30.800 --> 1:02:34.840
<v Speaker 1>have a bear market, bad bear market, uh that's prolonged,

1:02:35.080 --> 1:02:37.480
<v Speaker 1>you've got bad sequence risk and you may wind up

1:02:37.480 --> 1:02:40.520
<v Speaker 1>eating eating out out. At the other end of the spectrum,

1:02:40.560 --> 1:02:43.840
<v Speaker 1>if you're young, there's almost no risk to earning stocks

1:02:43.840 --> 1:02:47.200
<v Speaker 1>because you're periodically saving, and at some point in your

1:02:47.240 --> 1:02:49.760
<v Speaker 1>thirty or four year saving career, you're gonna buy a

1:02:49.760 --> 1:02:52.240
<v Speaker 1>lot of stocks very cheap, and you're gonna wind up

1:02:52.360 --> 1:02:55.360
<v Speaker 1>doing very very well. And I wish I had understood

1:02:55.400 --> 1:02:57.960
<v Speaker 1>that earlier in my career, so I could have been

1:02:58.000 --> 1:03:01.200
<v Speaker 1>more aggressive earlier in my career. But you know, as

1:03:01.200 --> 1:03:03.000
<v Speaker 1>it was at the time, So I don't feel too

1:03:03.000 --> 1:03:04.680
<v Speaker 1>bad about doot. But if there was one lesson I

1:03:04.720 --> 1:03:08.480
<v Speaker 1>wish I had had I had learned I had internalized

1:03:08.680 --> 1:03:10.360
<v Speaker 1>it was I could have been a lot more aggressive

1:03:10.400 --> 1:03:13.760
<v Speaker 1>when I was younger. Very interesting, Bill Bernstein, Thank you

1:03:14.000 --> 1:03:16.960
<v Speaker 1>so much for being so generous with your time. We

1:03:17.040 --> 1:03:21.280
<v Speaker 1>have been speaking with William Bernstein, author most recently of

1:03:21.400 --> 1:03:24.360
<v Speaker 1>the Delusion of Crowds, Why People Go Mad in Groups,

1:03:24.800 --> 1:03:28.040
<v Speaker 1>as well as a dozen other books. If you enjoy

1:03:28.120 --> 1:03:30.600
<v Speaker 1>this conversation, well be sure and check out any of

1:03:30.640 --> 1:03:34.600
<v Speaker 1>the previous three hundred and ninety conversations we've had over

1:03:34.600 --> 1:03:39.600
<v Speaker 1>the past seven years. You can find that at iTunes, Spotify,

1:03:39.760 --> 1:03:43.800
<v Speaker 1>where wherever you feed your podcast fix. We love your comments,

1:03:43.840 --> 1:03:48.440
<v Speaker 1>feedback and suggestions right to us at m IB podcast

1:03:48.480 --> 1:03:51.920
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot net. Give us a review on Apple iTunes.

1:03:52.480 --> 1:03:55.840
<v Speaker 1>You can sign up for my Daily reads at Ridolts

1:03:55.920 --> 1:03:59.200
<v Speaker 1>dot com. Check out my weekly column on Bloomberg dot

1:03:59.240 --> 1:04:03.680
<v Speaker 1>com slash Opinion. Follow me on Twitter at rid Halts.

1:04:03.760 --> 1:04:05.640
<v Speaker 1>I would be remiss if I did not thank the

1:04:05.720 --> 1:04:09.040
<v Speaker 1>crack staff that helps us put these conversations together each

1:04:09.080 --> 1:04:13.360
<v Speaker 1>and every week. Tim Harrow is my audio engineer. Atico

1:04:13.480 --> 1:04:17.880
<v Speaker 1>val Brond is my project manager. Michael Boyle is my producer.

1:04:18.000 --> 1:04:21.840
<v Speaker 1>Michael Batnick is my head of research. I'm Barry rit Halts.

1:04:22.160 --> 1:04:25.680
<v Speaker 1>You've been listening to Masters in Business. I'm Bloomberg Radio