WEBVTT - The Breakfast Club (Archive)

0:00:03.880 --> 0:00:05.720
<v Speaker 1>What kind of a show you guys.

0:00:05.440 --> 0:00:06.360
<v Speaker 2>Putting on here today?

0:00:06.480 --> 0:00:08.879
<v Speaker 3>You're not interested in armed now? No, look, we're going

0:00:08.920 --> 0:00:10.559
<v Speaker 3>to do this thing. We're going to have a conversation.

0:00:12.960 --> 0:00:16.760
<v Speaker 4>Hey, film spotters, Josh here with Adam this weekend, the

0:00:16.800 --> 0:00:19.919
<v Speaker 4>definitive eighties high school comedy The Breakfast Club is back

0:00:19.960 --> 0:00:25.919
<v Speaker 4>in theaters for its fortieth anniversary. Fortieth anniversary, still influential, Adam,

0:00:26.239 --> 0:00:29.400
<v Speaker 4>I think we both got news about a new release,

0:00:29.440 --> 0:00:33.040
<v Speaker 4>an India release called Pools that I believe is playing

0:00:33.760 --> 0:00:36.200
<v Speaker 4>right about now at Music Box Theater. Check that for sure.

0:00:36.240 --> 0:00:38.280
<v Speaker 4>I know they had their premiere there not too long ago,

0:00:38.800 --> 0:00:42.000
<v Speaker 4>and they described it as being influenced at Chicago made

0:00:42.000 --> 0:00:45.640
<v Speaker 4>and set and being influenced by John Hughes comedies of

0:00:45.800 --> 0:00:47.920
<v Speaker 4>the eighties like The Breakfast Club.

0:00:48.080 --> 0:00:49.960
<v Speaker 5>So yeah, definitely a movie that.

0:00:50.000 --> 0:00:56.480
<v Speaker 4>Is still affecting films and filmmakers many few decades on here,

0:00:56.760 --> 0:00:59.240
<v Speaker 4>and we wanted to share with you.

0:00:59.520 --> 0:01:01.760
<v Speaker 5>Are safe could cow review? Now?

0:01:01.760 --> 0:01:06.360
<v Speaker 4>We did this back for The Breakfast Club's thirtieth anniverse,

0:01:06.600 --> 0:01:08.320
<v Speaker 4>which was in twenty fifteen.

0:01:08.760 --> 0:01:11.600
<v Speaker 2>That's right, and we're not just busting it out for

0:01:11.720 --> 0:01:17.480
<v Speaker 2>its fortieth. It's also timely because this weekend September seventh,

0:01:17.560 --> 0:01:22.120
<v Speaker 2>and on Wednesday, September tenth, commemorating its fortieth anniversary. There

0:01:22.120 --> 0:01:25.720
<v Speaker 2>are going to be special theatrical screenings around the country.

0:01:25.800 --> 0:01:28.280
<v Speaker 2>If I can find a link with more details about that,

0:01:28.560 --> 0:01:31.560
<v Speaker 2>we'll post it in the show notes. Wherever you're listening

0:01:31.560 --> 0:01:34.399
<v Speaker 2>to the podcast, you can try to find it there. Otherwise,

0:01:34.480 --> 0:01:37.160
<v Speaker 2>just google it, look for it around you. Hopefully it

0:01:37.200 --> 0:01:39.240
<v Speaker 2>will be playing near you, especially if you haven't seen

0:01:39.280 --> 0:01:43.399
<v Speaker 2>it in maybe thirty years or so, or maybe somehow

0:01:43.760 --> 0:01:48.080
<v Speaker 2>you've never seen The Breakfast Club at all, or maybe

0:01:48.400 --> 0:01:52.200
<v Speaker 2>you're now you're our age and you have kids who

0:01:52.440 --> 0:01:56.840
<v Speaker 2>are the age that maybe we were when you saw

0:01:56.880 --> 0:01:59.000
<v Speaker 2>the film, when we saw the film for the first time,

0:01:59.360 --> 0:02:01.760
<v Speaker 2>and they can actually experienced it for the first time

0:02:01.800 --> 0:02:04.680
<v Speaker 2>on the big screen. This is your opportunity to see it.

0:02:04.720 --> 0:02:06.200
<v Speaker 2>September seventh, September tenth.

0:02:06.440 --> 0:02:08.440
<v Speaker 4>Now we're pulling this review, as I said, from the

0:02:08.440 --> 0:02:12.120
<v Speaker 4>Film Spotting Archives, Adam, And if you want access to

0:02:12.160 --> 0:02:15.360
<v Speaker 4>these archives all the time, all you have to do

0:02:15.639 --> 0:02:19.200
<v Speaker 4>is join the Film Spotting Family. That's where you'll get

0:02:19.280 --> 0:02:22.080
<v Speaker 4>those reviews. You'll get top fives and more going back

0:02:22.120 --> 0:02:24.960
<v Speaker 4>to two thousand and five. So archive access just one

0:02:25.000 --> 0:02:28.040
<v Speaker 4>of the benefits you get as a member of the family,

0:02:28.160 --> 0:02:30.560
<v Speaker 4>and you can learn more about all of that at

0:02:30.560 --> 0:02:35.639
<v Speaker 4>film spottingfamily dot com. For now here, enjoy our Sacred

0:02:35.680 --> 0:02:37.320
<v Speaker 4>Cow review of The Breakfast Club.

0:02:37.440 --> 0:02:39.000
<v Speaker 6>What do you say we closed that door?

0:02:39.360 --> 0:02:40.800
<v Speaker 3>We can't have any kind of part of the burning

0:02:40.880 --> 0:02:43.320
<v Speaker 3>checking us out every few seconds. You know, the doors

0:02:43.360 --> 0:02:45.600
<v Speaker 3>is supposed to stay open, So why don't you just

0:02:45.680 --> 0:02:47.680
<v Speaker 3>shut up? As for other people in here, you know

0:02:47.919 --> 0:02:48.679
<v Speaker 3>you can come see.

0:02:48.720 --> 0:02:51.200
<v Speaker 7>I knew you had to be smart to be a wrestler.

0:02:51.440 --> 0:02:55.320
<v Speaker 3>The hell you do to judge anybody anyway? Really, you know, Benda,

0:02:55.360 --> 0:02:57.919
<v Speaker 3>you don't even count. I mean, if you disappear forever,

0:02:57.919 --> 0:03:01.080
<v Speaker 3>it wouldn't make any differences. Well, not even exist at

0:03:01.080 --> 0:03:01.519
<v Speaker 3>this school.

0:03:02.480 --> 0:03:06.840
<v Speaker 7>Well I'll just run right out and join the wrestling team.

0:03:07.000 --> 0:03:09.680
<v Speaker 6>Maybe the prep club too, student council.

0:03:10.919 --> 0:03:11.679
<v Speaker 3>They wouldn't take you.

0:03:12.040 --> 0:03:12.640
<v Speaker 7>I'm hurt.

0:03:13.240 --> 0:03:15.800
<v Speaker 4>Our Sacred Cow selection this time Adam is a movie

0:03:15.800 --> 0:03:18.720
<v Speaker 4>that's maybe not sacred to cinophiles in general, but it

0:03:18.800 --> 0:03:22.160
<v Speaker 4>certainly is to those of our generation. The Breakfast Club

0:03:22.240 --> 0:03:25.520
<v Speaker 4>John Hughes chamber piece about five high schoolers stuck together

0:03:25.560 --> 0:03:28.959
<v Speaker 4>for a Saturday of detention came out in nineteen eighty five, Yes,

0:03:29.120 --> 0:03:32.000
<v Speaker 4>thirty years ago. You and I were not quite yet

0:03:32.040 --> 0:03:34.080
<v Speaker 4>in our teens then, but I know I at least

0:03:34.160 --> 0:03:37.560
<v Speaker 4>was already fascinated by all things teenager. I'm guessing I

0:03:37.600 --> 0:03:40.040
<v Speaker 4>didn't actually see the movie until it came out on

0:03:40.160 --> 0:03:42.720
<v Speaker 4>video most likely, but at that point I did watch

0:03:42.760 --> 0:03:45.160
<v Speaker 4>it enough times that I could predict most of the

0:03:45.200 --> 0:03:49.360
<v Speaker 4>lines of dialogue during this revisit. Judging by your brief

0:03:49.400 --> 0:03:52.640
<v Speaker 4>review on Letterbox, your revisit was a blissful trip down

0:03:52.680 --> 0:03:53.360
<v Speaker 4>memory lane.

0:03:53.880 --> 0:03:55.119
<v Speaker 5>Five stars.

0:03:55.400 --> 0:03:57.160
<v Speaker 4>That's as high as it goes on letters Are you

0:03:57.160 --> 0:03:59.080
<v Speaker 4>aware of that were five stars?

0:03:59.160 --> 0:04:00.080
<v Speaker 5>Okay?

0:04:00.240 --> 0:04:03.600
<v Speaker 4>I'm guessing one reason for this lavish rating is because

0:04:03.640 --> 0:04:06.120
<v Speaker 4>you picked up on a secondary level of wisdom to

0:04:06.160 --> 0:04:08.200
<v Speaker 4>the movie when watching it now as an adult.

0:04:08.360 --> 0:04:09.600
<v Speaker 5>Oh, one of the things.

0:04:09.480 --> 0:04:11.920
<v Speaker 4>You noted in your review was the truthfulness of an

0:04:11.960 --> 0:04:15.320
<v Speaker 4>observation made by Allison the basket Case, played by Ali Sheety,

0:04:15.560 --> 0:04:19.320
<v Speaker 4>who contends that we all become our parents. So what

0:04:19.480 --> 0:04:21.760
<v Speaker 4>was it like to watch The Breakfast Club now, not

0:04:21.839 --> 0:04:23.880
<v Speaker 4>as a kid, but as a parent, And how do

0:04:23.880 --> 0:04:27.000
<v Speaker 4>you feel about Allison's other observation When you grow up

0:04:27.279 --> 0:04:30.480
<v Speaker 4>your heart dies, is your heart Dead, Adam, is that

0:04:30.600 --> 0:04:34.359
<v Speaker 4>five star rating just a shameless attempt to prove otherwise.

0:04:33.960 --> 0:04:36.159
<v Speaker 2>It might be you might be onto something that is

0:04:36.160 --> 0:04:38.159
<v Speaker 2>a little bit melodramatic. But I love that line, and

0:04:38.200 --> 0:04:40.760
<v Speaker 2>I'll get to why in a moment. First, though, I

0:04:40.800 --> 0:04:42.480
<v Speaker 2>do hope there's a little bit of magic in the air.

0:04:42.560 --> 0:04:45.680
<v Speaker 2>Did you catch that when this film opens and you

0:04:45.760 --> 0:04:49.560
<v Speaker 2>get that opening voiceover that the date is the exact

0:04:49.600 --> 0:04:52.200
<v Speaker 2>same date we are sitting here to record tonight.

0:04:51.880 --> 0:04:53.200
<v Speaker 1>By Mark hitting twenty fourth.

0:04:53.440 --> 0:04:56.520
<v Speaker 2>Wow, it's March twenty fourth, nineteen eighty four, that Saturday,

0:04:56.600 --> 0:04:59.320
<v Speaker 2>thirty one years ago. They shot it before it came out,

0:04:59.320 --> 0:05:02.640
<v Speaker 2>clearly eighty five, but it's exactly the night. So, like

0:05:02.680 --> 0:05:05.800
<v Speaker 2>I said, hopefully that'll bring something to this discussion, and

0:05:05.839 --> 0:05:08.359
<v Speaker 2>it is for me. Forget being able to predict certain lines.

0:05:08.400 --> 0:05:12.080
<v Speaker 2>This was a unique Sacred Cow experience. We've always seen

0:05:12.120 --> 0:05:14.160
<v Speaker 2>the movies first, that's what makes them Sacred Cows. We're

0:05:14.200 --> 0:05:18.360
<v Speaker 2>revisiting them, But in this case I could quote, and

0:05:18.640 --> 0:05:22.039
<v Speaker 2>to the annoyance of my wife, did quote eighty percent

0:05:22.080 --> 0:05:24.600
<v Speaker 2>of the movie as it was going on. I don't

0:05:24.600 --> 0:05:26.840
<v Speaker 2>know to get to your question that watching it as

0:05:26.880 --> 0:05:29.479
<v Speaker 2>a parent really came into play for me. My son

0:05:29.520 --> 0:05:33.039
<v Speaker 2>Holden just turned thirteen. He's a huge nerd. He would

0:05:33.080 --> 0:05:35.080
<v Speaker 2>be the Brian here and he would use that term

0:05:35.120 --> 0:05:38.160
<v Speaker 2>to describe himself and do it with pride. High school

0:05:38.240 --> 0:05:42.000
<v Speaker 2>is hard, but I'm fairly constantly worried about my kids already.

0:05:42.000 --> 0:05:45.440
<v Speaker 2>I'm a high dread kind of guy. More significant to

0:05:45.520 --> 0:05:48.800
<v Speaker 2>me was seeing it as an adult. When I'm not

0:05:48.880 --> 0:05:51.560
<v Speaker 2>the same age, or, as you noted, a little bit

0:05:51.600 --> 0:05:54.479
<v Speaker 2>younger than these kids. Maybe I can't directly relate to

0:05:54.680 --> 0:05:57.560
<v Speaker 2>their day to day problems. Besides having a different perspective,

0:05:57.960 --> 0:06:00.839
<v Speaker 2>I was also just more aware of it as a movie,

0:06:00.960 --> 0:06:03.120
<v Speaker 2>how it's constructed, and hopefully we'll get to that a

0:06:03.160 --> 0:06:05.840
<v Speaker 2>little bit as well. I think that line from Alison

0:06:05.880 --> 0:06:07.800
<v Speaker 2>Ali Sheety, though, is one of the keys to the

0:06:07.800 --> 0:06:10.279
<v Speaker 2>Breakfast Club in terms of why it holds up so

0:06:10.320 --> 0:06:13.320
<v Speaker 2>well thirty years later. It's not just that it was.

0:06:13.760 --> 0:06:15.880
<v Speaker 2>I think that I can recall anyway the first movie

0:06:15.920 --> 0:06:20.719
<v Speaker 2>to simultaneously establish these high school archetypes while deconstructing them.

0:06:21.040 --> 0:06:26.080
<v Speaker 2>It's how seriously John Hughes takes these kids' concerns and

0:06:26.120 --> 0:06:29.480
<v Speaker 2>how thoroughly he explores them amidst all of this comedy,

0:06:29.520 --> 0:06:32.720
<v Speaker 2>sometimes broad silly comedy, he goes to some really dark,

0:06:32.880 --> 0:06:35.160
<v Speaker 2>serious places and he does it as well. In Ferris

0:06:35.240 --> 0:06:38.360
<v Speaker 2>Buehler's Day Off. If you think about Cameron his daddy issues,

0:06:38.400 --> 0:06:41.000
<v Speaker 2>destroying the beloved Ferrari at the end of that movie.

0:06:41.080 --> 0:06:43.640
<v Speaker 2>I always found that tonal shift in Ferris Bueller a

0:06:43.640 --> 0:06:46.560
<v Speaker 2>little bit cumbersome, a little bit hard to overcome because

0:06:46.960 --> 0:06:49.440
<v Speaker 2>it's such a heavy moment. And then it's sort of like, Oh,

0:06:49.440 --> 0:06:51.760
<v Speaker 2>we're back to Ferris Bueller running around backyards, and we're

0:06:51.760 --> 0:06:54.640
<v Speaker 2>just supposed to forget everything Cameron's going to face and

0:06:54.680 --> 0:06:58.440
<v Speaker 2>everything he's been through. But Emilio Estevez's monologue here about

0:06:58.440 --> 0:07:00.400
<v Speaker 2>three quarters the way through this movie about what he

0:07:00.520 --> 0:07:03.440
<v Speaker 2>did to get intolration, Yeah, and why good, that's even

0:07:03.480 --> 0:07:07.480
<v Speaker 2>darker than anything with Cameron, that unbroken take that underscores

0:07:07.520 --> 0:07:11.040
<v Speaker 2>the weight of it. That character isn't just telling a story.

0:07:11.240 --> 0:07:14.080
<v Speaker 2>He seems to be channeling something deep from within Anthony

0:07:14.080 --> 0:07:17.640
<v Speaker 2>Michael Hall's breakdown as well. Hughes is trying, i think,

0:07:17.640 --> 0:07:21.280
<v Speaker 2>in succeeding at making us laugh, but he's clearly using

0:07:21.360 --> 0:07:25.000
<v Speaker 2>these characters and this setting to really wrestle with something

0:07:25.200 --> 0:07:28.600
<v Speaker 2>wrestling with whether you can overcome your nature, your upbringing,

0:07:28.800 --> 0:07:31.480
<v Speaker 2>or if you're doomed to become your parents, can you

0:07:31.520 --> 0:07:34.000
<v Speaker 2>stop your heart from dying? I think that for me,

0:07:34.080 --> 0:07:36.600
<v Speaker 2>Josh is what makes this movie so timeless and universal.

0:07:36.640 --> 0:07:39.320
<v Speaker 2>Almost everyone, but especially any junior high kid or high

0:07:39.360 --> 0:07:42.559
<v Speaker 2>school kid, no matter what generation, can relate to. That fear,

0:07:43.040 --> 0:07:44.840
<v Speaker 2>along with everything else in the movie, is dealing with

0:07:44.880 --> 0:07:48.680
<v Speaker 2>as far as establishing your identity, retaining your individuality while

0:07:48.720 --> 0:07:51.320
<v Speaker 2>being part of a group, trying to be accepted within

0:07:51.320 --> 0:07:53.680
<v Speaker 2>that group or culture. So yeah, this movie really did

0:07:53.760 --> 0:07:56.080
<v Speaker 2>hit me about the same way it hit me thirty

0:07:56.160 --> 0:07:58.360
<v Speaker 2>years ago, which is something I wasn't expecting because I

0:07:58.400 --> 0:08:01.080
<v Speaker 2>hadn't seen it since then. Maybe actually in high school,

0:08:01.080 --> 0:08:03.920
<v Speaker 2>I remember showing it to my now wife because she

0:08:03.960 --> 0:08:06.240
<v Speaker 2>had never seen it, but I was still of that

0:08:06.320 --> 0:08:08.400
<v Speaker 2>age I was in high school. It really did resonate

0:08:08.440 --> 0:08:08.680
<v Speaker 2>with me.

0:08:09.000 --> 0:08:12.000
<v Speaker 4>Was it just recently last week? I think with Cinderella

0:08:12.040 --> 0:08:15.960
<v Speaker 4>probably we talked about children's films for a younger age group,

0:08:16.040 --> 0:08:18.680
<v Speaker 4>how it's important to respect that audience's intelligence, and the

0:08:18.680 --> 0:08:22.120
<v Speaker 4>same thing happens for teen audiences, where the filmmakers will

0:08:22.160 --> 0:08:24.840
<v Speaker 4>often consider let's just give them the lowest common denominator.

0:08:24.880 --> 0:08:27.840
<v Speaker 4>The Breakfast Club does not do that. It's very interested

0:08:27.880 --> 0:08:32.080
<v Speaker 4>in these kids, not as archetypes, as stereotypes as ways

0:08:32.240 --> 0:08:35.959
<v Speaker 4>to get some funny jokes out. It's interested in their

0:08:36.000 --> 0:08:39.720
<v Speaker 4>stories and the universality of their experiences. The bullying thing

0:08:40.320 --> 0:08:45.480
<v Speaker 4>that you mentioned Andrew's monologue is an amazing sustained sequence,

0:08:45.640 --> 0:08:49.120
<v Speaker 4>especially when you think about in nineteen eighty five. Clearly

0:08:49.360 --> 0:08:52.720
<v Speaker 4>that was something that educators were aware of, but it

0:08:52.920 --> 0:08:55.760
<v Speaker 4>was nowhere near to the degree of attention it gets

0:08:55.760 --> 0:08:58.800
<v Speaker 4>today in terms of experts coming into our schools and

0:08:58.840 --> 0:09:03.040
<v Speaker 4>having sessions with kids about being proactive about keeping.

0:09:02.760 --> 0:09:03.320
<v Speaker 5>This at bay.

0:09:03.480 --> 0:09:06.480
<v Speaker 1>But the complexity of it too, why he does That's why.

0:09:06.320 --> 0:09:10.160
<v Speaker 4>I'm talking to emotional awareness of understanding here. Well before

0:09:10.200 --> 0:09:12.720
<v Speaker 4>this was a common thing that people were digging into

0:09:13.160 --> 0:09:16.040
<v Speaker 4>of what led to it and how this is an

0:09:16.400 --> 0:09:19.319
<v Speaker 4>The act was an expression of Andrew responding to how

0:09:19.360 --> 0:09:23.560
<v Speaker 4>his father treated him, and just the really haunting line

0:09:23.559 --> 0:09:26.720
<v Speaker 4>that Andrew says, how do you apologize for something like that?

0:09:28.200 --> 0:09:34.640
<v Speaker 3>There's no way. It's all because of me, my own man.

0:09:34.720 --> 0:09:40.600
<v Speaker 3>I fucking hate him. He's like this, It's like this

0:09:40.760 --> 0:09:45.640
<v Speaker 3>mindless machine that I can't even relate to anymore. Andrew,

0:09:47.120 --> 0:09:51.120
<v Speaker 3>You've got to be number one. I won't tolerate any

0:09:51.200 --> 0:09:54.000
<v Speaker 3>lousures in this family. Your intensity is for shit?

0:09:54.840 --> 0:09:57.199
<v Speaker 1>When when when.

0:09:58.679 --> 0:09:59.160
<v Speaker 3>Your son?

0:10:01.320 --> 0:10:04.720
<v Speaker 4>I mean, what movie would not only acknowledge that the

0:10:04.800 --> 0:10:08.280
<v Speaker 4>kid is thinking about his action, just move beyond the action.

0:10:08.480 --> 0:10:11.760
<v Speaker 4>Most teen movies that deal with bullying are centered around

0:10:11.800 --> 0:10:14.120
<v Speaker 4>the act of bullying itself. And here's something considering the

0:10:14.160 --> 0:10:18.040
<v Speaker 4>aftermath and considering the sorrow on the part of the offender.

0:10:18.120 --> 0:10:20.360
<v Speaker 4>And we could talk about the way that the movie

0:10:20.400 --> 0:10:25.360
<v Speaker 4>gives almost every character in this film a chance to

0:10:26.240 --> 0:10:28.920
<v Speaker 4>consider who they are in that deep of a manner.

0:10:29.200 --> 0:10:31.560
<v Speaker 4>So I think this absolutely stands up. It did for

0:10:31.640 --> 0:10:33.680
<v Speaker 4>me as well. I didn't go quite as crazy for

0:10:33.760 --> 0:10:35.960
<v Speaker 4>it as you did. And maybe we can talk about.

0:10:35.800 --> 0:10:37.800
<v Speaker 1>Why I probably did. I backed off a little bit

0:10:37.960 --> 0:10:38.960
<v Speaker 1>or younger either, did you?

0:10:39.640 --> 0:10:44.240
<v Speaker 4>Oh all, I remember when I watched it is just thinking, yeah,

0:10:44.480 --> 0:10:46.120
<v Speaker 4>I loved it, and just thinking like, is this what

0:10:46.200 --> 0:10:46.960
<v Speaker 4>high school's like?

0:10:47.080 --> 0:10:47.320
<v Speaker 5>Wow?

0:10:47.360 --> 0:10:49.240
<v Speaker 4>You know it was kind of this because we were

0:10:49.280 --> 0:10:53.320
<v Speaker 4>both younger than the people in the story. You're kind

0:10:53.360 --> 0:10:55.560
<v Speaker 4>of looking at it as a primer with it. And

0:10:55.600 --> 0:10:58.400
<v Speaker 4>so that's why the dialogue would stick in my head.

0:10:58.440 --> 0:11:00.600
<v Speaker 4>It was almost like you're packing these things so that

0:11:00.640 --> 0:11:03.240
<v Speaker 4>you'll be ready when you get to high school. That's

0:11:03.280 --> 0:11:05.720
<v Speaker 4>what I remember taking it in as at that point.

0:11:06.000 --> 0:11:11.000
<v Speaker 4>But here, you know, it does just speak across generations

0:11:11.040 --> 0:11:12.040
<v Speaker 4>and across decades.

0:11:12.080 --> 0:11:12.960
<v Speaker 5>I would put it up there.

0:11:13.000 --> 0:11:15.320
<v Speaker 4>A couple of titles that work similarly in the teen

0:11:15.440 --> 0:11:19.320
<v Speaker 4>genre would be Splendor in the Grass decades earlier in

0:11:19.360 --> 0:11:22.080
<v Speaker 4>terms of just getting at that idea of you know,

0:11:22.240 --> 0:11:25.720
<v Speaker 4>puppy love much more focusing on sexuality, Yeah.

0:11:25.840 --> 0:11:28.040
<v Speaker 1>For sure, sexuality and sexual attention and.

0:11:28.400 --> 0:11:31.360
<v Speaker 4>That aspect of being a teenager. And then something more

0:11:31.400 --> 0:11:33.720
<v Speaker 4>recent Scott Pilgrim Versus the World. There is another movie

0:11:33.720 --> 0:11:36.520
<v Speaker 4>that I came out of and just thinking, man that

0:11:37.080 --> 0:11:40.720
<v Speaker 4>gets it, that manages to get at the heart of

0:11:40.840 --> 0:11:44.360
<v Speaker 4>what it was like to be a teenager. And these movies,

0:11:44.400 --> 0:11:46.840
<v Speaker 4>all three of those movies, they don't just get the

0:11:46.840 --> 0:11:50.160
<v Speaker 4>look right. They don't just get the dialogue right. I

0:11:50.200 --> 0:11:52.720
<v Speaker 4>might argue that The Breakfast Club does not get the

0:11:52.760 --> 0:11:55.079
<v Speaker 4>dialogue right, and a lot of situations in terms of

0:11:55.120 --> 0:11:57.280
<v Speaker 4>the phrases they use. But what these movies I'll do

0:11:57.360 --> 0:12:00.480
<v Speaker 4>is they embody the experience in such a way and

0:12:00.880 --> 0:12:04.400
<v Speaker 4>this film. Hughes does it primarily for the attention that

0:12:04.480 --> 0:12:08.480
<v Speaker 4>he gives to the characters and also the cast. I mean,

0:12:08.600 --> 0:12:10.839
<v Speaker 4>this thing would not work as well as it does

0:12:11.320 --> 0:12:13.680
<v Speaker 4>without this phenomenal cast, and we can maybe talk about

0:12:13.679 --> 0:12:16.319
<v Speaker 4>who we think rises to the top. I finally came

0:12:16.400 --> 0:12:18.360
<v Speaker 4>up with an answer after wrestling with that a little bit.

0:12:18.440 --> 0:12:21.079
<v Speaker 1>My son wrestling. Is that a Q maybe a big

0:12:21.200 --> 0:12:21.880
<v Speaker 1>Estavez fan?

0:12:22.040 --> 0:12:23.440
<v Speaker 5>No, I went another direction.

0:12:23.559 --> 0:12:25.320
<v Speaker 2>Well, I didn't really think about it in those terms,

0:12:25.400 --> 0:12:29.559
<v Speaker 2>but I did discover that I did appreciate these performances

0:12:29.600 --> 0:12:32.640
<v Speaker 2>beyond what I remember as a kid liking the movie

0:12:32.679 --> 0:12:35.160
<v Speaker 2>overall and not really judging those performances. Here, being a

0:12:35.200 --> 0:12:37.959
<v Speaker 2>little more objective or distance from it, I was able

0:12:37.960 --> 0:12:39.880
<v Speaker 2>to see them as what they are. I think they

0:12:39.920 --> 0:12:43.280
<v Speaker 2>are all really good, really strong performances. But I want

0:12:43.280 --> 0:12:46.000
<v Speaker 2>to go back to the opening of the film, because

0:12:46.520 --> 0:12:48.480
<v Speaker 2>all of these kids, this is the first thing I

0:12:48.520 --> 0:12:51.040
<v Speaker 2>said out loud as Sarah and I were watching the movie.

0:12:51.120 --> 0:12:53.480
<v Speaker 2>I'm like, all these kids are being driven to school

0:12:53.480 --> 0:12:55.520
<v Speaker 2>by their parents, and yet they seem to me like

0:12:55.559 --> 0:12:58.360
<v Speaker 2>maybe juniors or seniors. Maybe Brian is the youngest. He

0:12:58.480 --> 0:13:01.680
<v Speaker 2>might be fifteen, a sophomore but otherwise they all seem

0:13:01.720 --> 0:13:03.720
<v Speaker 2>like they're of driving age, but they're being dropped off

0:13:03.720 --> 0:13:04.319
<v Speaker 2>by their parents.

0:13:04.360 --> 0:13:05.160
<v Speaker 1>That seems so weird.

0:13:05.160 --> 0:13:06.600
<v Speaker 2>And of course then I thought about it for a

0:13:06.640 --> 0:13:09.960
<v Speaker 2>minute as that sequence played out, and I realized, it's.

0:13:09.840 --> 0:13:11.320
<v Speaker 1>All about that parent, it really is.

0:13:11.400 --> 0:13:13.600
<v Speaker 2>And you see what he is doing, what he accomplishes

0:13:13.640 --> 0:13:16.880
<v Speaker 2>there is he immediately gives us a window into their psyches.

0:13:17.280 --> 0:13:20.080
<v Speaker 2>We see where they're coming from, and for example, we

0:13:20.160 --> 0:13:23.199
<v Speaker 2>understand the disconnect between Claire and her dad, the academic

0:13:23.240 --> 0:13:26.280
<v Speaker 2>pressure and demands of Brian's mom, the athletic pressure and

0:13:26.320 --> 0:13:29.960
<v Speaker 2>demands of Andrew's dad, that blatant disregard of Allison's parent.

0:13:30.160 --> 0:13:31.600
<v Speaker 2>I don't even think we know who it is. They

0:13:31.640 --> 0:13:33.679
<v Speaker 2>just don't even acknowledge her and drive away. And of

0:13:33.679 --> 0:13:37.000
<v Speaker 2>course the loner bender who hilariously walks right in front

0:13:37.040 --> 0:13:39.600
<v Speaker 2>of the car without stopping. He's the one who comes

0:13:39.600 --> 0:13:42.040
<v Speaker 2>in by himself, no parent who cares about him. So

0:13:42.200 --> 0:13:44.480
<v Speaker 2>the whole movie set up right there, all those dynamics

0:13:44.520 --> 0:13:47.439
<v Speaker 2>that we need to see, and before we discover them

0:13:47.440 --> 0:13:49.960
<v Speaker 2>to be a certain type, we get to see them

0:13:50.000 --> 0:13:52.840
<v Speaker 2>as people and see that baggage that they're carrying with them.

0:13:53.320 --> 0:13:56.200
<v Speaker 2>Before they begin any of these interactions or these confrontations

0:13:56.200 --> 0:13:58.200
<v Speaker 2>with each other. It of course sets up the whole

0:13:58.200 --> 0:14:00.440
<v Speaker 2>trajectory of the story, as I said, but it also

0:14:00.520 --> 0:14:03.199
<v Speaker 2>gives us some insight that the other characters don't have.

0:14:03.280 --> 0:14:06.520
<v Speaker 2>I think it actually establishes a neat layer of subtext

0:14:06.600 --> 0:14:09.160
<v Speaker 2>to a lot of those interactions and confrontations that we

0:14:09.160 --> 0:14:13.560
<v Speaker 2>wouldn't otherwise be aware of. A perfect example is when

0:14:13.800 --> 0:14:18.880
<v Speaker 2>Bender does his impersonation of what it's like at the

0:14:19.040 --> 0:14:23.480
<v Speaker 2>Johnson resident the cuts to Anthony Michael Hall and his reaction.

0:14:24.280 --> 0:14:26.760
<v Speaker 2>You can read it as he's hurt because he's being

0:14:26.760 --> 0:14:30.400
<v Speaker 2>made fun of, But because we know what the dynamic

0:14:30.520 --> 0:14:33.520
<v Speaker 2>really is like at home, we as a viewer appreciate

0:14:33.560 --> 0:14:35.440
<v Speaker 2>that on a different level. We see through it a

0:14:35.440 --> 0:14:37.320
<v Speaker 2>little bit and we recognize that he's not just hurt

0:14:37.360 --> 0:14:40.280
<v Speaker 2>it being made fun of. He's actually hurt because he

0:14:40.360 --> 0:14:42.520
<v Speaker 2>wishes his home life was probably that way, and it's

0:14:42.560 --> 0:14:44.520
<v Speaker 2>not that way at all. So there are double layers

0:14:44.560 --> 0:14:46.240
<v Speaker 2>to a lot of what's going on in this film.

0:14:46.360 --> 0:14:48.680
<v Speaker 2>And we were talking about how quotable this is. And

0:14:48.720 --> 0:14:51.320
<v Speaker 2>for me in fifth grade when I saw this movie,

0:14:51.360 --> 0:14:54.160
<v Speaker 2>we watched it hundreds of times I mean probably not hundreds,

0:14:54.200 --> 0:14:56.040
<v Speaker 2>but it felt like it and we did know every

0:14:56.120 --> 0:14:58.680
<v Speaker 2>single line. So one of the questions I was really

0:14:58.840 --> 0:15:01.520
<v Speaker 2>wondering as I sat down to watch it now, like

0:15:01.560 --> 0:15:04.680
<v Speaker 2>I said, at least twenty years since I last saw it,

0:15:04.680 --> 0:15:06.880
<v Speaker 2>it was could it make me laugh? Could I actually

0:15:06.960 --> 0:15:09.400
<v Speaker 2>laugh out loud when I know all the lines, I

0:15:09.440 --> 0:15:12.520
<v Speaker 2>know all the jokes and what's coming. I laughed a lot.

0:15:12.640 --> 0:15:14.880
<v Speaker 2>I laughed out loud a lot of this movie. And

0:15:15.160 --> 0:15:18.800
<v Speaker 2>it wasn't at the big, broader jokes. The things that

0:15:19.000 --> 0:15:21.000
<v Speaker 2>did make me laugh a lot as a nine or

0:15:21.000 --> 0:15:24.080
<v Speaker 2>ten year old. It was the reactions, the expressions on

0:15:24.120 --> 0:15:27.320
<v Speaker 2>their faces, the overall absurdity of some of those moments,

0:15:27.440 --> 0:15:31.800
<v Speaker 2>like Bender and Brian Judd Nelson and Anthony Michael Hall

0:15:32.000 --> 0:15:35.200
<v Speaker 2>taking their coats off at the same time, and Ryan

0:15:35.600 --> 0:15:38.360
<v Speaker 2>acquiesces when Bender kind of shoots him a dirty look,

0:15:38.440 --> 0:15:40.640
<v Speaker 2>like are you copying me or something? And it's not

0:15:40.880 --> 0:15:43.080
<v Speaker 2>just that he decides to stop and put his coat

0:15:43.080 --> 0:15:45.560
<v Speaker 2>back on, that's funny enough, it's that he then rubs

0:15:45.560 --> 0:15:48.480
<v Speaker 2>his hands together like he's cold and he really wants

0:15:48.520 --> 0:15:50.640
<v Speaker 2>to put his jacket back on, but he feels the

0:15:50.680 --> 0:15:54.000
<v Speaker 2>need to put on that show is really funny. The

0:15:54.000 --> 0:15:56.400
<v Speaker 2>look Bender gives him when he does the I'm a

0:15:56.400 --> 0:15:58.880
<v Speaker 2>Walrus bit and he puts the pen on his lip.

0:15:59.240 --> 0:16:01.160
<v Speaker 2>Those bits for me that I maybe didn't laugh so

0:16:01.200 --> 0:16:03.760
<v Speaker 2>hard at, like I said, however many years ago, were

0:16:03.800 --> 0:16:05.000
<v Speaker 2>really funny to me this time.

0:16:05.080 --> 0:16:08.520
<v Speaker 4>A lot of those are the social cues that the

0:16:08.640 --> 0:16:13.000
<v Speaker 4>film just nails in how teens walk into a room

0:16:13.040 --> 0:16:15.680
<v Speaker 4>and it's immediately perhaps you know, it still happens when

0:16:15.720 --> 0:16:19.000
<v Speaker 4>you're adult, of course, but never more so as heightened

0:16:19.000 --> 0:16:22.360
<v Speaker 4>as when you're a teen. You're immediately staking your place,

0:16:22.560 --> 0:16:25.120
<v Speaker 4>and it captures how that's done through gestures and through

0:16:25.160 --> 0:16:27.880
<v Speaker 4>looks and those sorts of things. So life at Bry's

0:16:28.120 --> 0:16:31.280
<v Speaker 4>that scene is perhaps the standout to me. I had

0:16:31.320 --> 0:16:33.440
<v Speaker 4>three scenes that I want to make sure we talked okay,

0:16:33.640 --> 0:16:36.960
<v Speaker 4>and we got to the first one already, Estevez's confession

0:16:37.000 --> 0:16:39.200
<v Speaker 4>of bowling. I think that's crucial, and I think he's

0:16:39.200 --> 0:16:42.680
<v Speaker 4>fantastic in it, and I like how Hughes uses the

0:16:42.680 --> 0:16:45.560
<v Speaker 4>camera there too, as you said, unbroken, but also moving

0:16:45.760 --> 0:16:48.280
<v Speaker 4>around to include all of them in this conversation. This

0:16:48.440 --> 0:16:50.840
<v Speaker 4>was much more visually sophisticated than I would have expected

0:16:50.840 --> 0:16:53.560
<v Speaker 4>in revisiting it. But the other two scenes I wanted

0:16:53.600 --> 0:16:56.480
<v Speaker 4>to talk about are who I do give my MVP

0:16:56.600 --> 0:17:00.600
<v Speaker 4>award again, not that we need to, but to Judd Nelson, Yeah,

0:17:00.640 --> 0:17:04.160
<v Speaker 4>and life at Bryce the way that goes from this

0:17:04.320 --> 0:17:05.760
<v Speaker 4>comic impersonation that's.

0:17:05.640 --> 0:17:07.199
<v Speaker 5>Also so bitter.

0:17:07.560 --> 0:17:09.920
<v Speaker 4>I mean, it's just so clear that the reason this

0:17:10.040 --> 0:17:12.240
<v Speaker 4>really bothers him is because his home life is not

0:17:12.400 --> 0:17:14.800
<v Speaker 4>like that too, And as much fun as he's making

0:17:15.280 --> 0:17:19.159
<v Speaker 4>of Brian, that he's also just furious because of this

0:17:19.240 --> 0:17:21.879
<v Speaker 4>other element going on. And then how it transitioned to

0:17:21.960 --> 0:17:25.120
<v Speaker 4>the impression of life at his house, which is really scary.

0:17:25.480 --> 0:17:28.359
<v Speaker 4>I mean, Nelson and we got to talk about this

0:17:28.440 --> 0:17:31.119
<v Speaker 4>as well, how he treats Claire, because I think we

0:17:31.160 --> 0:17:34.280
<v Speaker 4>look at that differently, people in general would look at

0:17:34.280 --> 0:17:36.359
<v Speaker 4>that differently than they did in nineteen eighty five. And

0:17:36.400 --> 0:17:38.800
<v Speaker 4>he's scary with her too. But I think that's a

0:17:38.920 --> 0:17:41.600
<v Speaker 4>very good element of the performance. I love the different

0:17:41.800 --> 0:17:44.000
<v Speaker 4>levels that Nelson brings to this. Even when he has

0:17:44.040 --> 0:17:47.960
<v Speaker 4>that early standoff with Vernon and he gets the four

0:17:48.200 --> 0:17:50.879
<v Speaker 4>or eight extra weeks of detention, there's that.

0:17:50.800 --> 0:17:52.720
<v Speaker 5>Moment got Chay, Yeah, there's that.

0:17:52.680 --> 0:17:56.720
<v Speaker 4>Moment where he turns away and you can see that. Okay,

0:17:56.720 --> 0:17:58.919
<v Speaker 4>most high school comedies would play that up.

0:17:58.840 --> 0:18:00.560
<v Speaker 5>Purely for Trump the rebel.

0:18:00.680 --> 0:18:03.000
<v Speaker 4>He's the rebel, but they hold it that one extra

0:18:03.040 --> 0:18:05.400
<v Speaker 4>beat so that he shows he's pissed at himself.

0:18:05.480 --> 0:18:07.159
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, for him leeing self control.

0:18:07.240 --> 0:18:08.240
<v Speaker 4>He can't believe he did it.

0:18:08.520 --> 0:18:09.720
<v Speaker 5>So those are two things.

0:18:09.760 --> 0:18:12.080
<v Speaker 4>The other one goes to Nelson too, and it is

0:18:12.160 --> 0:18:17.040
<v Speaker 4>that early one where it's it's a sexual harassment slash

0:18:17.080 --> 0:18:22.320
<v Speaker 4>seduction of Claire and watching that very early on where

0:18:22.359 --> 0:18:25.359
<v Speaker 4>he's trying to find out, you know what, how sexually

0:18:25.400 --> 0:18:27.800
<v Speaker 4>experienced she is. He's flirting with her at the same

0:18:27.800 --> 0:18:32.640
<v Speaker 4>time she's acting repulse but also pulling back enough here

0:18:32.720 --> 0:18:36.000
<v Speaker 4>and there to I don't want to say toy with him,

0:18:36.040 --> 0:18:39.720
<v Speaker 4>but to give him the hint that she's still listening.

0:18:39.840 --> 0:18:41.280
<v Speaker 5>Let's just put it that way for sure, all right.

0:18:41.280 --> 0:18:43.840
<v Speaker 4>So in nineteen eighty five, and as a kid, you know,

0:18:43.920 --> 0:18:44.800
<v Speaker 4>I'm taking.

0:18:44.480 --> 0:18:46.320
<v Speaker 5>That as Wow, is this guy cool?

0:18:46.880 --> 0:18:47.160
<v Speaker 3>You know?

0:18:47.200 --> 0:18:50.280
<v Speaker 4>And you'll hear from women too, or I think I

0:18:50.320 --> 0:18:51.800
<v Speaker 4>saw it on It might have been the film's finding

0:18:51.880 --> 0:18:55.160
<v Speaker 4>Facebook feed. That's where girls fell in love with John Bender,

0:18:55.200 --> 0:18:55.920
<v Speaker 4>that bad boy.

0:18:56.600 --> 0:18:57.440
<v Speaker 7>What's yours?

0:18:57.880 --> 0:19:00.880
<v Speaker 3>Claire? Claire Claire.

0:19:00.960 --> 0:19:02.000
<v Speaker 2>It's a family name.

0:19:02.720 --> 0:19:05.479
<v Speaker 7>Oh it's a fat girl's name. Oh, thank you, you're welcome.

0:19:05.720 --> 0:19:07.800
<v Speaker 7>Not fat, well, not a present, but I could see

0:19:07.800 --> 0:19:09.520
<v Speaker 7>you really pushing maximum density.

0:19:10.040 --> 0:19:10.360
<v Speaker 3>You see.

0:19:10.400 --> 0:19:12.520
<v Speaker 6>I'm not sure if you know this, but there are

0:19:12.520 --> 0:19:13.760
<v Speaker 6>two kinds of fat people.

0:19:14.960 --> 0:19:17.399
<v Speaker 3>There's fat people that were born to be fat, and

0:19:17.440 --> 0:19:18.160
<v Speaker 3>there's fat.

0:19:17.960 --> 0:19:21.159
<v Speaker 6>People that were once thin but they became fat. So

0:19:21.200 --> 0:19:22.840
<v Speaker 6>when you look at them, you can sort of see

0:19:22.920 --> 0:19:24.399
<v Speaker 6>that thin person inside.

0:19:25.280 --> 0:19:27.920
<v Speaker 7>You see you're gonna get married, You're gonna squeeze out

0:19:27.920 --> 0:19:35.720
<v Speaker 7>a few puppies. And then, oh, I've.

0:19:35.600 --> 0:19:38.439
<v Speaker 6>Seen finger gestures from such a pristine girl.

0:19:39.320 --> 0:19:40.399
<v Speaker 1>Not that pristine.

0:19:41.640 --> 0:19:47.640
<v Speaker 6>Are you a virgin? I'll bet you a million dollars

0:19:48.400 --> 0:19:49.000
<v Speaker 6>that you are.

0:19:49.960 --> 0:19:52.919
<v Speaker 4>You read that scene today where we're much more attuned

0:19:53.119 --> 0:19:59.360
<v Speaker 4>to things like sexual harassment, and it reads very creepily.

0:20:00.440 --> 0:20:03.120
<v Speaker 4>But I think that's good as well, because it speaks

0:20:03.119 --> 0:20:05.880
<v Speaker 4>to the authenticity. So we could say we could put

0:20:05.880 --> 0:20:09.440
<v Speaker 4>a politically correct label on this and say, oh, breakfast

0:20:09.440 --> 0:20:11.800
<v Speaker 4>Club is so dated because of scenes like that, but

0:20:11.840 --> 0:20:13.919
<v Speaker 4>I think it speaks to an authenticity again of the

0:20:13.960 --> 0:20:18.560
<v Speaker 4>social cues of how girls and guys, whether it's right

0:20:18.640 --> 0:20:21.800
<v Speaker 4>or wrong, do interact and how they handle those sorts

0:20:21.800 --> 0:20:25.360
<v Speaker 4>of interactions. Now, the one place where we might want

0:20:25.400 --> 0:20:28.399
<v Speaker 4>to talk about does the movie make a misstep is

0:20:28.440 --> 0:20:31.680
<v Speaker 4>in following through on where does that relationship go by

0:20:31.680 --> 0:20:33.959
<v Speaker 4>the end of the film. A Is that believable? And

0:20:34.040 --> 0:20:37.359
<v Speaker 4>B is that maybe getting us to root for something

0:20:37.359 --> 0:20:39.480
<v Speaker 4>that really is unhealthy. I'm still trying to work my

0:20:39.520 --> 0:20:42.720
<v Speaker 4>way through that because people read the ending differently as well.

0:20:42.800 --> 0:20:45.520
<v Speaker 4>Whether or not Bender and Claire do end up together

0:20:46.280 --> 0:20:48.800
<v Speaker 4>or was this kind of a one off flirtation thing.

0:20:48.880 --> 0:20:50.640
<v Speaker 2>Well, let's just go ahead and get to it, because

0:20:50.680 --> 0:20:52.439
<v Speaker 2>I don't want to sidetrack the whole review with it.

0:20:52.520 --> 0:20:55.720
<v Speaker 2>But for me, it's not as problematic because I do

0:20:55.760 --> 0:20:57.920
<v Speaker 2>see it as more of a one off type of thing.

0:20:57.920 --> 0:21:00.520
<v Speaker 2>I don't think come Monday, Bender and Claire are holding

0:21:00.520 --> 0:21:02.880
<v Speaker 2>hands with each other walking down the hall, or he's

0:21:02.920 --> 0:21:05.399
<v Speaker 2>showing up at her house and angering her father. I

0:21:05.440 --> 0:21:09.479
<v Speaker 2>see this as a one time act of kindness and

0:21:09.520 --> 0:21:11.639
<v Speaker 2>compassion and deciding to call a truce.

0:21:11.720 --> 0:21:12.240
<v Speaker 1>But that's it.

0:21:12.320 --> 0:21:14.119
<v Speaker 2>I don't see them embarking on any kind of a

0:21:14.119 --> 0:21:15.080
<v Speaker 2>relationship with each other.

0:21:15.200 --> 0:21:16.880
<v Speaker 5>Okay, I wouldn't go quite that far.

0:21:17.160 --> 0:21:19.119
<v Speaker 4>I don't think they're holding hands on Monday either. But

0:21:19.160 --> 0:21:20.720
<v Speaker 4>I think the movie wants you to believe there is

0:21:20.720 --> 0:21:23.600
<v Speaker 4>a relationship that will continue there, and I think in

0:21:23.680 --> 0:21:25.640
<v Speaker 4>having us root for that is where we might want

0:21:25.640 --> 0:21:28.160
<v Speaker 4>to say, uh, okay, I don't know if that's that's

0:21:28.240 --> 0:21:30.320
<v Speaker 4>quite so healthy. But that also brings to mind somebody

0:21:30.320 --> 0:21:32.280
<v Speaker 4>I thought of after watching this, how did they not

0:21:32.400 --> 0:21:35.879
<v Speaker 4>make the sequel The Breakfast Club Monday Morning and let

0:21:36.000 --> 0:21:38.639
<v Speaker 4>us know, you know, what really happened to these kids

0:21:39.040 --> 0:21:42.120
<v Speaker 4>when they showed up that day. I'm totally with you.

0:21:42.320 --> 0:21:44.800
<v Speaker 4>Nobody even gave each other a second glance. Yeah, I mean,

0:21:45.000 --> 0:21:47.479
<v Speaker 4>as hopeful as this movie wants to be, if it

0:21:47.520 --> 0:21:50.359
<v Speaker 4>really stayed true and was as authentic as it is

0:21:50.720 --> 0:21:53.800
<v Speaker 4>to these kids that Monday morning would be they don't

0:21:53.840 --> 0:21:54.240
<v Speaker 4>know each other.

0:21:54.440 --> 0:21:56.000
<v Speaker 2>Well, maybe we'll come back to this. It is sort

0:21:56.000 --> 0:21:57.880
<v Speaker 2>of like Before Sunrise in a little bit where you win.

0:21:58.040 --> 0:21:59.719
<v Speaker 2>Six months later, what's going to happen? And the key

0:21:59.760 --> 0:22:02.359
<v Speaker 2>question uestion for thirty years And that's one of the

0:22:02.400 --> 0:22:04.200
<v Speaker 2>beauties of this film as well, is that we still

0:22:04.200 --> 0:22:07.680
<v Speaker 2>have that question to ask and ponder in debate because

0:22:07.680 --> 0:22:10.520
<v Speaker 2>we don't know the answer. But I'm with you, except

0:22:10.560 --> 0:22:13.159
<v Speaker 2>I would say Josh. A second glance is exactly what

0:22:13.200 --> 0:22:15.840
<v Speaker 2>they do and no more. I think we get the

0:22:15.840 --> 0:22:18.360
<v Speaker 2>second glance. I think there's a little bit social queue.

0:22:18.119 --> 0:22:20.360
<v Speaker 4>Where they try to let each other know that they

0:22:20.400 --> 0:22:22.480
<v Speaker 4>remember said right. Anyone else sees.

0:22:22.320 --> 0:22:24.119
<v Speaker 1>That's exactly right. But that's what bender.

0:22:24.600 --> 0:22:27.840
<v Speaker 2>I appreciated him as a young man, as a young

0:22:27.920 --> 0:22:32.200
<v Speaker 2>kid because I respected his verbal dexterity and his sort

0:22:32.200 --> 0:22:33.399
<v Speaker 2>of just rebellious spirit.

0:22:33.440 --> 0:22:34.200
<v Speaker 1>It probably was look.

0:22:34.200 --> 0:22:36.640
<v Speaker 2>I wasn't growing up watching scooball comedy, So watching someone

0:22:36.640 --> 0:22:39.359
<v Speaker 2>who is that quick and that witty and able to

0:22:39.359 --> 0:22:42.199
<v Speaker 2>disarm people the way he was that was attractive to

0:22:42.200 --> 0:22:44.159
<v Speaker 2>me at that age. I didn't really see it as

0:22:44.160 --> 0:22:46.960
<v Speaker 2>a performance in anything deeper than that until watching it

0:22:47.080 --> 0:22:49.560
<v Speaker 2>this time. I do love his costuming as well. I

0:22:49.600 --> 0:22:52.000
<v Speaker 2>picked him as one of the top five Halloween costumes

0:22:52.000 --> 0:22:56.080
<v Speaker 2>I'd wear fast this past October. But you watch it,

0:22:56.080 --> 0:22:58.920
<v Speaker 2>it's such a hodgepodge of looks. He's grabbing an all

0:22:58.960 --> 0:23:02.480
<v Speaker 2>these different places to try to form some kind of identity.

0:23:02.480 --> 0:23:05.960
<v Speaker 2>You've got the flannel before flannel was a look, the boots,

0:23:06.240 --> 0:23:09.280
<v Speaker 2>those hand glove things he's wearing a little bit, there's

0:23:09.320 --> 0:23:12.480
<v Speaker 2>some of that kind of biker, rebel, criminal thing. But

0:23:12.480 --> 0:23:16.240
<v Speaker 2>there's also a guy wearing that overcoat like he's a prep.

0:23:16.520 --> 0:23:18.679
<v Speaker 2>You know, he really is just grasping at anything, and

0:23:18.680 --> 0:23:20.680
<v Speaker 2>I think that applies to a lot of the characters here.

0:23:20.800 --> 0:23:23.320
<v Speaker 2>But you're right in terms of the performance, that sense

0:23:23.359 --> 0:23:28.720
<v Speaker 2>of anger and resentment but also pain that underlies everything here.

0:23:28.920 --> 0:23:33.520
<v Speaker 2>You realize watching it this time that he's overcompensating for everything.

0:23:33.800 --> 0:23:37.280
<v Speaker 2>That confident routine really is just completely enact with him.

0:23:37.320 --> 0:23:41.880
<v Speaker 2>And what is underlying everything is that fear that everything

0:23:42.000 --> 0:23:44.280
<v Speaker 2>Andrew says to him at one point is accurate. Oh,

0:23:44.440 --> 0:23:46.680
<v Speaker 2>just that he really doesn't matter, and that comes through

0:23:46.720 --> 0:23:48.080
<v Speaker 2>in Nelson's performance.

0:23:47.720 --> 0:23:49.440
<v Speaker 4>And Claire calls him out on it too, And that's

0:23:49.440 --> 0:23:52.520
<v Speaker 4>where I like the ring Wall performance where she definitely

0:23:52.840 --> 0:23:55.280
<v Speaker 4>has those strong moments where she gives it back to

0:23:55.359 --> 0:23:57.600
<v Speaker 4>him and lay great bear. She sees through all of

0:23:57.640 --> 0:24:00.560
<v Speaker 4>that because she's doing similar things. They're all doing similar things,

0:24:00.600 --> 0:24:03.200
<v Speaker 4>so they all know what they're doing, but who's going

0:24:03.240 --> 0:24:04.879
<v Speaker 4>to admit to it. Well, first of all, they're going

0:24:04.920 --> 0:24:05.959
<v Speaker 4>to call each other out on it.

0:24:06.680 --> 0:24:09.320
<v Speaker 8>This episode is brought to you by Peloton break Through

0:24:09.359 --> 0:24:11.800
<v Speaker 8>the busiest time of year with the brand new Peloton

0:24:11.880 --> 0:24:15.560
<v Speaker 8>Cross Training tread Plus powered by peloton Iq. With real

0:24:15.600 --> 0:24:18.639
<v Speaker 8>time guidance and endless ways to move, you can personalize

0:24:18.680 --> 0:24:21.920
<v Speaker 8>your workouts and train with confidence, helping you reach your

0:24:21.920 --> 0:24:26.080
<v Speaker 8>goals in less time. Let yourself run, lift, sculpt, push

0:24:26.200 --> 0:24:29.520
<v Speaker 8>and go. Explore the new Peloton Cross Training tread Plus

0:24:29.560 --> 0:24:31.480
<v Speaker 8>at oneploton dot Com.

0:24:31.600 --> 0:24:31.879
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

0:24:31.920 --> 0:24:33.000
<v Speaker 1>No, that's exactly right.

0:24:33.080 --> 0:24:35.960
<v Speaker 2>And I think that as we talk about the look

0:24:35.960 --> 0:24:38.240
<v Speaker 2>of this film, you mentioned that it was more visually

0:24:38.280 --> 0:24:39.320
<v Speaker 2>sophisticated than you.

0:24:39.280 --> 0:24:41.240
<v Speaker 1>Remember it or would have even noticed it. That's right.

0:24:41.400 --> 0:24:44.640
<v Speaker 2>I think that shot, though, that unbroken take that rotates

0:24:44.640 --> 0:24:47.280
<v Speaker 2>around the group, is probably the only shot that really

0:24:47.359 --> 0:24:50.040
<v Speaker 2>calls attention to itself in the film. But what I

0:24:50.160 --> 0:24:52.720
<v Speaker 2>noticed this time, and this is one of those bits

0:24:52.760 --> 0:24:54.800
<v Speaker 2>on the show here where audio certainly doesn't help us.

0:24:54.920 --> 0:24:58.760
<v Speaker 2>A video essay would be much more instructive, because what

0:24:58.880 --> 0:25:03.080
<v Speaker 2>I loved is is the editing. I really noticed this

0:25:03.200 --> 0:25:06.080
<v Speaker 2>time how much of the movie is made by the cutting,

0:25:06.640 --> 0:25:09.520
<v Speaker 2>because it's not visually audacious, and it has so many

0:25:09.600 --> 0:25:12.600
<v Speaker 2>memorable lines of dialogue in it. I think everybody focuses

0:25:12.600 --> 0:25:14.520
<v Speaker 2>on the writing, and they give Hughes All this credit

0:25:14.880 --> 0:25:19.040
<v Speaker 2>as a screenwriter but all of the relationships, the character dynamics,

0:25:19.480 --> 0:25:22.760
<v Speaker 2>it's all revealed in the silences, in the looks on

0:25:22.800 --> 0:25:26.320
<v Speaker 2>their faces, in their reactions, because it really is all

0:25:26.359 --> 0:25:29.400
<v Speaker 2>about their perceptions of each other, and not only that,

0:25:29.480 --> 0:25:32.919
<v Speaker 2>how we perceive their perceptions. So, as I said before,

0:25:32.960 --> 0:25:36.240
<v Speaker 2>everything is loaded, So when you cut to a reaction shot,

0:25:36.400 --> 0:25:38.719
<v Speaker 2>you're really focused on how they're taking that in and

0:25:38.760 --> 0:25:41.000
<v Speaker 2>what that tells you about how they see themselves, how

0:25:41.000 --> 0:25:44.399
<v Speaker 2>they see the person who's talking. That is something certainly

0:25:44.400 --> 0:25:46.520
<v Speaker 2>at age nine or ten I didn't catch on too,

0:25:46.760 --> 0:25:49.119
<v Speaker 2>but it's there. It really is in those decisions and

0:25:49.400 --> 0:25:52.840
<v Speaker 2>think about that. That has to be pretty formally rigorous

0:25:52.960 --> 0:25:56.200
<v Speaker 2>because you've got pretty much the whole film, five people

0:25:56.320 --> 0:25:59.439
<v Speaker 2>sitting around each other, and depending on how they shot it,

0:25:59.480 --> 0:26:01.640
<v Speaker 2>and depending on how he was visualized it and maybe

0:26:01.680 --> 0:26:04.240
<v Speaker 2>storyboarded it or not, there was probably a lot of

0:26:04.320 --> 0:26:06.879
<v Speaker 2>coverage options to cut to, so the editor could have

0:26:06.880 --> 0:26:09.640
<v Speaker 2>gone in a lot of different directions, but it's very precise.

0:26:10.040 --> 0:26:12.840
<v Speaker 2>Every cut is done for a reason, and every cut

0:26:13.000 --> 0:26:15.480
<v Speaker 2>does have some meaning. And that was something, as I said,

0:26:15.520 --> 0:26:16.800
<v Speaker 2>that caught me by surprise this.

0:26:16.760 --> 0:26:20.600
<v Speaker 4>Time for a movie that primarily takes place within that library,

0:26:20.600 --> 0:26:22.240
<v Speaker 4>it does not feel static at all.

0:26:22.440 --> 0:26:23.320
<v Speaker 5>And when they get out.

0:26:23.160 --> 0:26:26.160
<v Speaker 4>Of the library, I noticed too that there's some nice

0:26:26.240 --> 0:26:29.240
<v Speaker 4>framing of individuals or even them as a group within

0:26:29.280 --> 0:26:33.199
<v Speaker 4>these long institutional halls, and you could just tell that

0:26:33.280 --> 0:26:35.920
<v Speaker 4>care has been taken in trying to place them within

0:26:36.000 --> 0:26:38.680
<v Speaker 4>this landscape and alienate them a little bit. I mean,

0:26:38.960 --> 0:26:40.960
<v Speaker 4>we don only get too carried away and that you're

0:26:40.960 --> 0:26:42.760
<v Speaker 4>going to put this in and it's going to wow

0:26:42.840 --> 0:26:46.480
<v Speaker 4>you with its cinematography. Now, but compared to most team

0:26:46.560 --> 0:26:48.959
<v Speaker 4>comedies where the cameras just PLoP down and they go

0:26:49.040 --> 0:26:51.880
<v Speaker 4>for the gags, it really does have another level going on.

0:26:52.320 --> 0:26:54.720
<v Speaker 4>In the soundtrack too, a little bit with there's the

0:26:54.760 --> 0:26:57.560
<v Speaker 4>moment in particular. I think the same thing happens later on,

0:26:57.600 --> 0:26:59.440
<v Speaker 4>but the one I'm thinking of is very early on

0:26:59.760 --> 0:27:03.760
<v Speaker 4>when Vernon slams the door shut and Bender screams the

0:27:03.880 --> 0:27:06.960
<v Speaker 4>FU and it echoes in a way, and we cut

0:27:07.000 --> 0:27:10.359
<v Speaker 4>to Vernon and we were not quite sure whether Bender

0:27:10.440 --> 0:27:13.280
<v Speaker 4>even said it or if this is something that you know,

0:27:13.480 --> 0:27:14.800
<v Speaker 4>this is just how Vernon.

0:27:14.520 --> 0:27:15.400
<v Speaker 8>Sees these kids.

0:27:15.400 --> 0:27:16.080
<v Speaker 1>It's interesting and.

0:27:16.080 --> 0:27:19.840
<v Speaker 4>It's amplified and there's just a little some nicely clever

0:27:20.000 --> 0:27:20.639
<v Speaker 4>bits going on.

0:27:20.760 --> 0:27:23.800
<v Speaker 1>Like that for sure, Carl, What can I ask you

0:27:23.840 --> 0:27:24.280
<v Speaker 1>a question?

0:27:24.760 --> 0:27:28.920
<v Speaker 7>Sure? How does one become a janitor? Do you want

0:27:28.920 --> 0:27:29.600
<v Speaker 7>to be a janitor?

0:27:30.000 --> 0:27:30.080
<v Speaker 4>No?

0:27:30.200 --> 0:27:32.480
<v Speaker 6>I just want to know how one becomes a janitor

0:27:32.520 --> 0:27:36.359
<v Speaker 6>because Andrew here is very interested in pursuing a career

0:27:36.400 --> 0:27:37.600
<v Speaker 6>in the custodia arts.

0:27:38.080 --> 0:27:41.439
<v Speaker 7>Oh really, do you guys think I'm just someth untouchable peasant,

0:27:41.640 --> 0:27:42.479
<v Speaker 7>sir pon?

0:27:42.600 --> 0:27:44.640
<v Speaker 3>You know, maybe so.

0:27:46.119 --> 0:27:48.320
<v Speaker 7>Falling a broom around after shitheads like you. For the

0:27:48.400 --> 0:27:50.919
<v Speaker 7>last eight years, I've learned a couple of things. I

0:27:50.920 --> 0:27:56.000
<v Speaker 7>look through your letters, look through your lockers. I listened

0:27:56.040 --> 0:27:58.000
<v Speaker 7>to your conversations. You don't know that, but I do.

0:27:59.119 --> 0:28:03.000
<v Speaker 7>I am the eye and ears of this institution, my friends.

0:28:03.640 --> 0:28:06.080
<v Speaker 2>Now, I thought it'd be interesting to hear from one

0:28:06.080 --> 0:28:09.080
<v Speaker 2>of the key figures in the movie, Carl, the janitor,

0:28:09.359 --> 0:28:13.119
<v Speaker 2>John Capelos, was available for us to talk to and

0:28:13.280 --> 0:28:15.600
<v Speaker 2>do an interview with, and obviously it seemed like a

0:28:15.640 --> 0:28:19.399
<v Speaker 2>perfect fit for this thirtieth anniversary review of The Breakfast Club.

0:28:19.440 --> 0:28:21.879
<v Speaker 2>And even though we couldn't do it, Golden Joe Tosso,

0:28:22.000 --> 0:28:25.439
<v Speaker 2>our amazing co producer, was available to conduct the interview.

0:28:25.520 --> 0:28:27.320
<v Speaker 2>He took some of my questions worked in a few

0:28:27.320 --> 0:28:31.560
<v Speaker 2>of his own, and Joe got John Capelos's take on

0:28:31.680 --> 0:28:34.800
<v Speaker 2>why he thinks the movie resonated so strongly with audiences

0:28:34.800 --> 0:28:37.000
<v Speaker 2>in nineteen eighty five and why it continues to.

0:28:37.320 --> 0:28:40.240
<v Speaker 6>I think because it hits on universal truths that are

0:28:40.280 --> 0:28:45.240
<v Speaker 6>always going to be there. In adolescence. There's fear, there's

0:28:45.520 --> 0:28:49.600
<v Speaker 6>a fear of failure, there's sort of dealing with your

0:28:49.600 --> 0:28:52.000
<v Speaker 6>parents and all the sort of the incumbent issues that

0:28:52.440 --> 0:28:54.920
<v Speaker 6>you know, and you walk away from the film going,

0:28:55.000 --> 0:28:58.760
<v Speaker 6>wait a minute, what just happened? Here was a sort

0:28:58.760 --> 0:29:02.720
<v Speaker 6>of a Catharsis for these people. And I think that

0:29:03.000 --> 0:29:07.320
<v Speaker 6>kids continually relate to this movie because it addresses teenage

0:29:07.360 --> 0:29:09.680
<v Speaker 6>acts and it doesn't talk down to them period.

0:29:10.080 --> 0:29:12.440
<v Speaker 2>I really responded to the fact that all of their

0:29:12.480 --> 0:29:15.000
<v Speaker 2>problems don't get solved, and I don't know that I

0:29:15.000 --> 0:29:17.320
<v Speaker 2>expected that, knowing the movie as well as I did,

0:29:17.560 --> 0:29:19.280
<v Speaker 2>but I think a lot of teen movies might have

0:29:19.320 --> 0:29:24.080
<v Speaker 2>gone there. They overcome their differences temporarily, they don't correct

0:29:24.680 --> 0:29:28.080
<v Speaker 2>themselves or each other. Nobody gets fixed. I think here

0:29:28.120 --> 0:29:30.480
<v Speaker 2>watching this movie, they don't absolve each other for their

0:29:30.520 --> 0:29:34.000
<v Speaker 2>deficiencies and their foibles because of course they can't. That's

0:29:34.160 --> 0:29:35.960
<v Speaker 2>not reality. And I think that gets back to what

0:29:36.000 --> 0:29:38.160
<v Speaker 2>you were saying in terms of authenticity. This is a

0:29:38.200 --> 0:29:40.560
<v Speaker 2>reprieve from those lives, but they're going to get back

0:29:40.560 --> 0:29:43.320
<v Speaker 2>to those lives. And to use the word that I

0:29:43.320 --> 0:29:45.800
<v Speaker 2>think is so appropriate. We heard from Carl the janitor

0:29:45.840 --> 0:29:49.440
<v Speaker 2>John Kapolos, it's catharsis. There is a sense of Catharsis

0:29:49.480 --> 0:29:51.720
<v Speaker 2>at the end of this film, and I was thinking

0:29:51.720 --> 0:29:55.240
<v Speaker 2>about why that final shot, that final frame of Bender

0:29:55.320 --> 0:29:58.360
<v Speaker 2>with his fist up in the air, why that gives

0:29:58.360 --> 0:30:00.200
<v Speaker 2>you this sense of triumph when at the end the

0:30:00.240 --> 0:30:03.440
<v Speaker 2>day you think nothing much has really changed here. And

0:30:03.520 --> 0:30:06.640
<v Speaker 2>actually Diablo Cody, the screenwriter, is on the DVD and

0:30:06.680 --> 0:30:09.240
<v Speaker 2>she talks about it as it's of course playing very

0:30:09.240 --> 0:30:12.320
<v Speaker 2>memorably to the Simple Mind song Don't You Forget About Me.

0:30:12.400 --> 0:30:14.880
<v Speaker 2>She says, it's just about a saturday in detention, but

0:30:14.920 --> 0:30:17.360
<v Speaker 2>you feel like a battle has been won, And she's right,

0:30:17.400 --> 0:30:19.920
<v Speaker 2>you do somehow feel like a battle has been won,

0:30:20.240 --> 0:30:22.760
<v Speaker 2>or at least some kind of blow has been struck, right,

0:30:22.840 --> 0:30:25.360
<v Speaker 2>something decisive has happened, even if it's not going to

0:30:25.440 --> 0:30:28.160
<v Speaker 2>change everything forever, some kind of blow has been struck

0:30:28.200 --> 0:30:31.800
<v Speaker 2>against conformity, against complacency, falling into those roles and those

0:30:31.960 --> 0:30:35.160
<v Speaker 2>prior beliefs about each other and ultimately about compassion. And

0:30:35.200 --> 0:30:37.040
<v Speaker 2>that's what I was hinting at when I said they'll

0:30:37.040 --> 0:30:39.360
<v Speaker 2>at least give each other that second look. I think

0:30:39.400 --> 0:30:41.720
<v Speaker 2>that second look is that bit of compassion. So lots

0:30:41.720 --> 0:30:43.920
<v Speaker 2>of C words there, but catharsis is a big one

0:30:43.960 --> 0:30:44.960
<v Speaker 2>as well as compassion.

0:30:45.040 --> 0:30:47.200
<v Speaker 5>I think the right word is reprieve. I think that's

0:30:47.280 --> 0:30:47.640
<v Speaker 5>dead on.

0:30:48.160 --> 0:30:51.800
<v Speaker 4>And the difference is that this is a reprieve that

0:30:51.880 --> 0:30:55.360
<v Speaker 4>you feel is formative. So if it does not have

0:30:55.560 --> 0:30:59.440
<v Speaker 4>a practical effect on Monday morning, the hope is it

0:30:59.520 --> 0:31:03.120
<v Speaker 4>will gradually as they move on with their lives. All right,

0:31:03.160 --> 0:31:05.840
<v Speaker 4>So let me pump the brakes a little bit on

0:31:05.960 --> 0:31:07.960
<v Speaker 4>this saw, this enthusiasm, and.

0:31:08.480 --> 0:31:09.360
<v Speaker 1>Just ask.

0:31:11.160 --> 0:31:12.720
<v Speaker 4>I can ruin that they just have to, you know,

0:31:12.800 --> 0:31:14.480
<v Speaker 4>one of us has to be a little bit reasonable

0:31:14.520 --> 0:31:18.120
<v Speaker 4>about the breakfast club. Some of the dialogue, it seems

0:31:18.200 --> 0:31:21.560
<v Speaker 4>like I feel like Hughes understands kids much better than

0:31:21.560 --> 0:31:24.520
<v Speaker 4>maybe he understood how they talked things like eat my shorts.

0:31:24.960 --> 0:31:28.120
<v Speaker 4>And you know, no one in whatever grade I was,

0:31:28.240 --> 0:31:33.720
<v Speaker 4>sixth or fifth would say that, no there's a lot

0:31:33.720 --> 0:31:36.400
<v Speaker 4>of lines like that, the dance montage to I mean,

0:31:36.440 --> 0:31:37.840
<v Speaker 4>I know, are they high at that point?

0:31:37.960 --> 0:31:39.480
<v Speaker 5>Is that the excuse we give them.

0:31:39.360 --> 0:31:41.840
<v Speaker 2>Right, which I don't think anybody really reacts to being

0:31:41.920 --> 0:31:42.680
<v Speaker 2>high that way.

0:31:42.880 --> 0:31:45.720
<v Speaker 1>Everyone gets menik like they're on PCP or something.

0:31:45.520 --> 0:31:48.120
<v Speaker 4>And then they're doing these routines together. I mean, you know,

0:31:48.400 --> 0:31:49.920
<v Speaker 4>he had fun with it, but as a kid, I

0:31:49.920 --> 0:31:51.120
<v Speaker 4>thought that was pretty corny.

0:31:51.120 --> 0:31:51.760
<v Speaker 1>So I don't know.

0:31:51.800 --> 0:31:53.680
<v Speaker 2>I think those lines, Josh, it did occur to me

0:31:53.760 --> 0:31:55.480
<v Speaker 2>when he says eat my shorts, and there were maybe

0:31:55.560 --> 0:31:57.959
<v Speaker 2>one or two other bendor lines where I thought I

0:31:58.000 --> 0:32:00.480
<v Speaker 2>don't think he would say it that way. But those

0:32:00.600 --> 0:32:05.200
<v Speaker 2>are so compensated for by all of the other really

0:32:05.280 --> 0:32:08.640
<v Speaker 2>insightful lines and those pieces of dialogue like you already

0:32:08.680 --> 0:32:10.920
<v Speaker 2>touched on where you get the end of a scene

0:32:10.960 --> 0:32:14.800
<v Speaker 2>with a line like Andrew recognizing, how do you apologize

0:32:14.840 --> 0:32:16.560
<v Speaker 2>for that? There are too many good lines like that

0:32:16.600 --> 0:32:17.200
<v Speaker 2>where you just.

0:32:17.120 --> 0:32:19.200
<v Speaker 5>Think that's why the clunkers stand down. Yeah, maybe.

0:32:21.000 --> 0:32:21.360
<v Speaker 1>At all.

0:32:21.600 --> 0:32:24.360
<v Speaker 2>No, that really isn't, especially when as I was saying

0:32:24.400 --> 0:32:28.080
<v Speaker 2>a couple of other things, I like Paul Gleeson as

0:32:29.320 --> 0:32:33.200
<v Speaker 2>he's phenomenal, and this is sort of like when Roger

0:32:33.280 --> 0:32:35.920
<v Speaker 2>Ebert revisited the Graduate after I think thirty years of

0:32:36.000 --> 0:32:38.080
<v Speaker 2>thirty five years, and he was kind of negative on

0:32:38.120 --> 0:32:40.400
<v Speaker 2>the movie, and he told that story about how when

0:32:40.400 --> 0:32:41.960
<v Speaker 2>he was a kid, he saw the guy at the

0:32:42.000 --> 0:32:45.200
<v Speaker 2>pool party giving Benjamin Braddick advice about plastics and he

0:32:45.280 --> 0:32:47.280
<v Speaker 2>laughed at him like everybody else did in the audience.

0:32:47.280 --> 0:32:49.080
<v Speaker 1>And now thirty years later he thinks.

0:32:48.960 --> 0:32:51.480
<v Speaker 2>Plastics not a bad idea, right, he has that different

0:32:51.480 --> 0:32:55.560
<v Speaker 2>perspective being an older man. Well, Paul Gleeson as Vernon

0:32:56.200 --> 0:32:59.960
<v Speaker 2>at that time was nothing but an adversary and antagon

0:33:00.320 --> 0:33:03.360
<v Speaker 2>who didn't understand these kids. He was purely the enemy.

0:33:03.600 --> 0:33:06.239
<v Speaker 2>But it's not a surprise that Hughes gives him that

0:33:06.360 --> 0:33:09.640
<v Speaker 2>scene with Carl in the basement of the school, and

0:33:10.120 --> 0:33:14.400
<v Speaker 2>you get a sense of his own disillusionment with his

0:33:14.560 --> 0:33:16.840
<v Speaker 2>role and what he's doing there at the school. Why

0:33:16.840 --> 0:33:19.239
<v Speaker 2>he's even there at the school on a Saturday at

0:33:19.240 --> 0:33:22.000
<v Speaker 2>all for someone who should be in a loftier position.

0:33:22.120 --> 0:33:25.239
<v Speaker 2>I mean thirty one, I think he said thirty one

0:33:25.240 --> 0:33:26.000
<v Speaker 2>thousand dollars a year.

0:33:26.080 --> 0:33:27.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's not about redeeming him.

0:33:28.280 --> 0:33:31.080
<v Speaker 2>It's not about us ever sighting with him against the kids,

0:33:31.240 --> 0:33:33.560
<v Speaker 2>but it is at least a little bit about getting

0:33:33.720 --> 0:33:35.800
<v Speaker 2>his perspective, and I think that's enough having a little

0:33:35.800 --> 0:33:37.920
<v Speaker 2>bit of empathy for where he's coming from as well.

0:33:37.920 --> 0:33:40.160
<v Speaker 2>It makes him a more interesting figure when you have

0:33:40.280 --> 0:33:42.000
<v Speaker 2>that bit of empathy for him. And I do think

0:33:42.000 --> 0:33:46.880
<v Speaker 2>that Carl's line to Vernon underscores another key moment in

0:33:46.880 --> 0:33:50.000
<v Speaker 2>the movie for me, along with Allison's line, which is listen,

0:33:50.120 --> 0:33:52.280
<v Speaker 2>vern if you were sixteen, what would you think of you?

0:33:52.960 --> 0:33:56.280
<v Speaker 2>That's something that he probably hadn't thought of until Carl

0:33:56.320 --> 0:33:59.040
<v Speaker 2>said that to him, really forced himself to look at

0:33:59.040 --> 0:34:01.800
<v Speaker 2>it that way and wondered how far he's come and

0:34:01.840 --> 0:34:04.560
<v Speaker 2>how much he has changed in this process. And watching

0:34:04.560 --> 0:34:06.800
<v Speaker 2>this movie again, when they cut to him in his

0:34:06.880 --> 0:34:10.799
<v Speaker 2>office and he's isolated in there while they're isolated in

0:34:10.840 --> 0:34:14.280
<v Speaker 2>that library setting, you are keenly aware of his isolation

0:34:14.400 --> 0:34:17.240
<v Speaker 2>and his loneliness and a sense that he's being punished

0:34:17.280 --> 0:34:18.919
<v Speaker 2>as well. He has to sit there, as we said

0:34:18.920 --> 0:34:21.920
<v Speaker 2>on this Saturday, that's what his life has amounted to.

0:34:22.000 --> 0:34:25.279
<v Speaker 2>That probably isn't what he envisioned when he started out,

0:34:25.320 --> 0:34:28.359
<v Speaker 2>as Karl alludes to in that conversation, all he has

0:34:28.880 --> 0:34:33.120
<v Speaker 2>really going for him is power or some sense of respect,

0:34:33.200 --> 0:34:35.279
<v Speaker 2>and the kids don't even give him that, so of

0:34:35.320 --> 0:34:37.799
<v Speaker 2>course imagine how he's then going to behave. But again,

0:34:37.840 --> 0:34:40.400
<v Speaker 2>I never felt any empathy for Vernon before, or recognized

0:34:40.440 --> 0:34:44.000
<v Speaker 2>any of myself in Vernon, and now as I watch it,

0:34:44.040 --> 0:34:46.440
<v Speaker 2>I realize that there is a lot more tunem than that.

0:34:46.640 --> 0:34:46.799
<v Speaker 8>Well.

0:34:46.800 --> 0:34:48.960
<v Speaker 4>Gleason makes him more than the butt of the joke

0:34:49.040 --> 0:34:50.560
<v Speaker 4>for sure, I mean he is the literal butt of

0:34:50.600 --> 0:34:53.400
<v Speaker 4>the joke in many instances, but because of that scene

0:34:53.440 --> 0:34:58.400
<v Speaker 4>you mentioned, and he's also not just a cardboard villain,

0:34:58.480 --> 0:35:00.800
<v Speaker 4>because his villainy, if you can even and use that word,

0:35:01.400 --> 0:35:04.840
<v Speaker 4>ties into what I think really this movie is spending

0:35:04.840 --> 0:35:08.319
<v Speaker 4>a lot of time considering and it's parental failure. He

0:35:08.480 --> 0:35:12.239
<v Speaker 4>is treating these kids, or relating to them power the

0:35:12.360 --> 0:35:15.120
<v Speaker 4>word you use, the same way that it appears most

0:35:15.160 --> 0:35:19.600
<v Speaker 4>of their parents relate to them, this authoritarian power dynamic.

0:35:20.040 --> 0:35:22.640
<v Speaker 4>He just puts that into place at school, that's what

0:35:22.680 --> 0:35:26.680
<v Speaker 4>they're experiencing at home, And if anything, the movie is

0:35:26.719 --> 0:35:32.279
<v Speaker 4>this argument that there are more to your kids or

0:35:32.360 --> 0:35:36.560
<v Speaker 4>the teenage experience than just keeping them in line and

0:35:36.600 --> 0:35:38.480
<v Speaker 4>making sure they do what they're supposed.

0:35:38.120 --> 0:35:40.200
<v Speaker 2>To do right there is at least one more topic

0:35:40.239 --> 0:35:42.560
<v Speaker 2>I want to get into before we finalize this review,

0:35:42.560 --> 0:35:44.680
<v Speaker 2>but I thought it would make sense to hear a

0:35:44.680 --> 0:35:47.520
<v Speaker 2>little bit more from John Kapolos. Of course, Carl the

0:35:47.560 --> 0:35:50.200
<v Speaker 2>janitor here in this movie. As I was talking about

0:35:50.239 --> 0:35:53.240
<v Speaker 2>that conversation in the basement and the relationship between Carl

0:35:53.360 --> 0:35:57.000
<v Speaker 2>and Vernon, I wanted Joe to ask him about the

0:35:57.040 --> 0:35:59.560
<v Speaker 2>fact that he seems to be articulating one of the

0:35:59.640 --> 0:36:01.960
<v Speaker 2>key l of the movie, almost given the theme of

0:36:02.000 --> 0:36:04.960
<v Speaker 2>the movie to bestow on Vernon and the audience, and

0:36:05.040 --> 0:36:08.160
<v Speaker 2>I wanted his sense of his function as a character

0:36:08.600 --> 0:36:09.840
<v Speaker 2>in the movie to me.

0:36:10.400 --> 0:36:15.640
<v Speaker 6>A lot of what Carl does is kind of underlines,

0:36:16.320 --> 0:36:18.360
<v Speaker 6>as one would say, the theme of the film, but

0:36:18.480 --> 0:36:23.600
<v Speaker 6>also underlines the notion that you you have dreams, you

0:36:23.640 --> 0:36:27.239
<v Speaker 6>have aspirations, you have things you want to be, but

0:36:27.440 --> 0:36:31.719
<v Speaker 6>be prepared because they are going to be crushed. And

0:36:31.800 --> 0:36:34.719
<v Speaker 6>you think the detention is difficult, and you think that

0:36:34.760 --> 0:36:37.960
<v Speaker 6>this world that you're in right now is difficult, you know,

0:36:38.600 --> 0:36:42.440
<v Speaker 6>stay tuned. And there was a monologue that I delivered

0:36:43.040 --> 0:36:44.840
<v Speaker 6>that told them world, they're all going to be like

0:36:44.880 --> 0:36:48.480
<v Speaker 6>twenty five thirty years like today, right. I told Mollie

0:36:48.520 --> 0:36:50.800
<v Speaker 6>that she's going to have stretch marks from here to Zion.

0:36:51.320 --> 0:36:54.640
<v Speaker 6>She's going to have five kids, a Ford suburban. She's

0:36:54.680 --> 0:36:56.520
<v Speaker 6>going to be drinking too much, and her husband's not

0:36:56.560 --> 0:36:59.120
<v Speaker 6>going to pay attention to her. You know, have fun

0:36:59.160 --> 0:37:01.680
<v Speaker 6>with that. And I told Michael he's going to be

0:37:01.719 --> 0:37:03.520
<v Speaker 6>a big lawyer, is going to work in a big

0:37:03.560 --> 0:37:05.759
<v Speaker 6>loop law firm. He's going to be big money and

0:37:05.800 --> 0:37:07.319
<v Speaker 6>he's going to have a big heart attack and a

0:37:07.320 --> 0:37:10.080
<v Speaker 6>big funeral at forty two. I told Emilio that he's

0:37:10.080 --> 0:37:11.600
<v Speaker 6>going to be a failed athlete and he's going to

0:37:11.600 --> 0:37:13.279
<v Speaker 6>be a gym teacher for the rest of his life

0:37:13.320 --> 0:37:17.640
<v Speaker 6>and living vicariously through his son, like his father is

0:37:17.680 --> 0:37:20.600
<v Speaker 6>living through him, and on and on it goes Judd Nelson.

0:37:20.600 --> 0:37:22.520
<v Speaker 6>I said, well, you're going to spend five years at Attica,

0:37:22.640 --> 0:37:25.840
<v Speaker 6>four years in Chino, you know, for armed robbery, and

0:37:25.880 --> 0:37:28.920
<v Speaker 6>I sort of enumerated this long list of crimes that

0:37:28.960 --> 0:37:32.399
<v Speaker 6>he's going to commit. And Ali Sheedy failed loft artist

0:37:32.480 --> 0:37:34.560
<v Speaker 6>in New York, living off the kindness of strangers, etc.

0:37:34.880 --> 0:37:36.120
<v Speaker 1>So it was a.

0:37:36.000 --> 0:37:39.000
<v Speaker 6>Really great thing because in a way that expressed like, hey,

0:37:39.080 --> 0:37:42.480
<v Speaker 6>you know, you think you got it tough now stay tuned,

0:37:42.760 --> 0:37:44.840
<v Speaker 6>and in a way he was sort of senior buzzkill.

0:37:45.080 --> 0:37:48.120
<v Speaker 2>So John goes on to explain that DeeDee Allen the editor,

0:37:48.160 --> 0:37:50.600
<v Speaker 2>and John he was ultimately decided to leave that monologue

0:37:50.600 --> 0:37:53.359
<v Speaker 2>out of the film. Obviously it's not there, and boy

0:37:53.400 --> 0:37:55.719
<v Speaker 2>are we grateful, right? I mean, can you imagine if

0:37:56.000 --> 0:37:58.359
<v Speaker 2>all of that was unloaded on those kids and us

0:37:58.719 --> 0:38:02.359
<v Speaker 2>as an audience, it have been totally heavy handed, and

0:38:02.520 --> 0:38:05.680
<v Speaker 2>it would have been unnecessary. And now that I'm thinking

0:38:05.680 --> 0:38:08.959
<v Speaker 2>about that smart choice by d d Allen, and I'm

0:38:09.040 --> 0:38:11.880
<v Speaker 2>thinking of my comments earlier about how sophisticated the editing

0:38:11.960 --> 0:38:14.200
<v Speaker 2>is in this film. Just before I sat down here,

0:38:14.239 --> 0:38:16.239
<v Speaker 2>I thought D d Allen he mentioned her by name,

0:38:16.280 --> 0:38:19.320
<v Speaker 2>otherwise I probably would have failed to That sounds really familiar.

0:38:19.360 --> 0:38:21.359
<v Speaker 2>I'm gonna look her up on IMDb and see what

0:38:21.400 --> 0:38:23.479
<v Speaker 2>else she has done, And of course what we see

0:38:23.560 --> 0:38:28.759
<v Speaker 2>is just a few movies like The Hustler, Bonnie and Clyde, Surproco,

0:38:29.200 --> 0:38:31.040
<v Speaker 2>Dog Day Afternoon Reds.

0:38:31.320 --> 0:38:31.560
<v Speaker 5>Nice.

0:38:31.680 --> 0:38:34.360
<v Speaker 2>She's done, She's done some work, and it certainly was

0:38:34.400 --> 0:38:36.080
<v Speaker 2>a case where she had the right instinct to lose

0:38:36.120 --> 0:38:38.359
<v Speaker 2>that monologue. Though it does explain Josh why when he

0:38:38.400 --> 0:38:41.640
<v Speaker 2>says that line about the clock, by the way, is

0:38:41.640 --> 0:38:44.160
<v Speaker 2>twenty minutes fast. They really react to that, and I

0:38:44.239 --> 0:38:46.880
<v Speaker 2>noticed watching it this time, they seemed almost overreact to it,

0:38:46.920 --> 0:38:49.880
<v Speaker 2>like it was a better little closing jab than it is. Well,

0:38:49.920 --> 0:38:52.879
<v Speaker 2>it's because that was the kicker to that monologue, which

0:38:52.880 --> 0:38:53.920
<v Speaker 2>would have been much funnier.

0:38:53.960 --> 0:38:56.760
<v Speaker 4>And they also keep a slight variation on that. Bender

0:38:56.800 --> 0:38:58.880
<v Speaker 4>delivers a little bit of that that's true to Claire,

0:38:58.960 --> 0:39:02.000
<v Speaker 4>so we get a tap that's funny. He describes Carl

0:39:02.400 --> 0:39:04.760
<v Speaker 4>as a buzzkill because he struck me on this watch

0:39:04.840 --> 0:39:07.680
<v Speaker 4>as being pretty zen actually.

0:39:07.280 --> 0:39:09.600
<v Speaker 5>And this model of a guy who.

0:39:09.320 --> 0:39:12.040
<v Speaker 4>Maybe didn't end up where you know he envisioned, but

0:39:12.480 --> 0:39:14.760
<v Speaker 4>few people do and take it as.

0:39:14.600 --> 0:39:15.680
<v Speaker 5>It comes, and it is.

0:39:15.880 --> 0:39:18.160
<v Speaker 4>It's a really good performance. Yeah, it does, sir, for

0:39:18.560 --> 0:39:21.520
<v Speaker 4>as little screen time as he got, serves a crucial

0:39:21.560 --> 0:39:22.400
<v Speaker 4>function for the film.

0:39:22.520 --> 0:39:24.399
<v Speaker 2>Okay, well, I told you I had one more area

0:39:24.440 --> 0:39:26.480
<v Speaker 2>I wanted to get into. I just would be remiss.

0:39:26.480 --> 0:39:28.120
<v Speaker 2>I think we'd be remiss if we didn't go down

0:39:28.160 --> 0:39:30.520
<v Speaker 2>this path. You talked about Claire and Bender and that

0:39:30.600 --> 0:39:33.239
<v Speaker 2>relationship maybe being more problematic. But I'm going to get

0:39:33.280 --> 0:39:35.440
<v Speaker 2>to another clip here that I want to prompt you

0:39:35.520 --> 0:39:38.560
<v Speaker 2>with Josh a little bit, because back in two thousand

0:39:38.560 --> 0:39:41.719
<v Speaker 2>and seven, I interviewed Ellen Page and Diablo Cody for

0:39:41.800 --> 0:39:45.640
<v Speaker 2>the movie Juno, and I asked Cody about an Entertainment

0:39:45.640 --> 0:39:48.640
<v Speaker 2>Weekly article I had read that she was interviewed for

0:39:48.960 --> 0:39:51.600
<v Speaker 2>where she referenced angela chase from My so called Life

0:39:52.040 --> 0:39:55.799
<v Speaker 2>as a bit of a template for Juno similar sensibilities,

0:39:56.200 --> 0:39:58.239
<v Speaker 2>and I asked her if she had any others, and

0:39:58.280 --> 0:40:01.120
<v Speaker 2>she mentioned ghost a World, but basically said, it's kind

0:40:01.120 --> 0:40:02.760
<v Speaker 2>of sad that I can only think of a couple

0:40:02.760 --> 0:40:06.000
<v Speaker 2>of examples of these kind of strong female characters on screen.

0:40:06.280 --> 0:40:08.560
<v Speaker 2>And so then I asked Ellen Page if she could

0:40:08.560 --> 0:40:11.920
<v Speaker 2>think of any others, and that led her to Ali.

0:40:11.960 --> 0:40:14.839
<v Speaker 9>Shety that Ali Sheedy gets all pretty in the end

0:40:14.920 --> 0:40:17.040
<v Speaker 9>for the boy. I can't believe that this is like

0:40:17.120 --> 0:40:20.120
<v Speaker 9>an iconic breaking barriers movie. I am sorry for all

0:40:20.120 --> 0:40:21.919
<v Speaker 9>the lovers at the breakfast club, but when I first

0:40:21.920 --> 0:40:27.320
<v Speaker 9>saw that, I was like traumatized. Really, the unique girl

0:40:28.200 --> 0:40:29.480
<v Speaker 9>totally changes herself.

0:40:29.760 --> 0:40:31.440
<v Speaker 3>It's so strange that you brought that up, because I

0:40:31.440 --> 0:40:33.040
<v Speaker 3>had discussed that with somebody earlier today.

0:40:33.040 --> 0:40:35.799
<v Speaker 9>Actually, the whole Ali Shady thing at the end is

0:40:35.840 --> 0:40:39.440
<v Speaker 9>deeply distressing, and for what Emilia asked OFVZ.

0:40:40.360 --> 0:40:41.520
<v Speaker 1>You know, but he's a wrestler.

0:40:41.719 --> 0:40:44.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so I want to know, Josh, did you find

0:40:44.640 --> 0:40:48.400
<v Speaker 2>it deeply distressing that transformation that Alison makes at the

0:40:48.480 --> 0:40:50.520
<v Speaker 2>end of the film. Cody is all over the Breakfast

0:40:50.560 --> 0:40:54.200
<v Speaker 2>Club thirtieth Anniversary Blu Ray. She's in documentary. She does

0:40:54.640 --> 0:40:58.680
<v Speaker 2>love this movie and praises it considerably. But they ask

0:40:58.719 --> 0:41:00.839
<v Speaker 2>her about this and she doesn't back down from saying

0:41:00.840 --> 0:41:02.040
<v Speaker 2>that she sees it as a little bit of a

0:41:02.040 --> 0:41:04.040
<v Speaker 2>betrayal of that character, Allison selling out.

0:41:04.080 --> 0:41:05.520
<v Speaker 5>What do you think totally with her?

0:41:05.680 --> 0:41:08.440
<v Speaker 4>Really the point, oh, come on to the point that

0:41:08.600 --> 0:41:13.640
<v Speaker 4>even my self, my eleven year old self recognized, I

0:41:13.640 --> 0:41:17.399
<v Speaker 4>can distinctly remember that being a let down for me

0:41:17.440 --> 0:41:20.640
<v Speaker 4>as a boy because one of the characters that I

0:41:20.760 --> 0:41:25.759
<v Speaker 4>probably I mean, I wasn't like I would say, being

0:41:25.760 --> 0:41:30.200
<v Speaker 4>an introvert as a kid. I remember being feeling connected

0:41:30.200 --> 0:41:33.640
<v Speaker 4>to the Ali Sheety character to that degree that there's

0:41:33.719 --> 0:41:36.560
<v Speaker 4>really no type in that film that I identified with

0:41:36.920 --> 0:41:39.080
<v Speaker 4>when I was in high school. They're probably just too broad,

0:41:39.160 --> 0:41:42.520
<v Speaker 4>nobody really does. But I very much liked her character.

0:41:42.600 --> 0:41:43.399
<v Speaker 4>Let me put it that way.

0:41:43.440 --> 0:41:45.799
<v Speaker 1>I thought I thought she would in the performance, just.

0:41:45.960 --> 0:41:48.720
<v Speaker 4>You know, someone who was really cool in that sort

0:41:48.719 --> 0:41:52.560
<v Speaker 4>of in the background watching what's going on, probably smarter

0:41:52.680 --> 0:41:56.279
<v Speaker 4>than maybe even Brian and dolling it out only when

0:41:56.280 --> 0:42:01.000
<v Speaker 4>it was necessary. So I really liked Allison, and I

0:42:01.040 --> 0:42:03.759
<v Speaker 4>remember being like, what is this now? No, this is

0:42:04.120 --> 0:42:07.320
<v Speaker 4>no good beyond not even just not buying the romantic

0:42:07.360 --> 0:42:09.800
<v Speaker 4>element of it, but this sort of what they're getting

0:42:09.840 --> 0:42:11.799
<v Speaker 4>at more is like, this is not her, this is

0:42:11.840 --> 0:42:13.560
<v Speaker 4>not you know, doesn't need to happen.

0:42:13.600 --> 0:42:14.560
<v Speaker 5>So yeah, I'm with them on that.

0:42:14.840 --> 0:42:17.160
<v Speaker 2>Okay, Well, I definitely see the argument for sure, but

0:42:17.480 --> 0:42:19.160
<v Speaker 2>I didn't see it that way as a kid, and

0:42:19.200 --> 0:42:22.120
<v Speaker 2>I still don't completely see it that way now. And

0:42:22.400 --> 0:42:26.560
<v Speaker 2>I think it is worth noting the specific words that

0:42:26.600 --> 0:42:29.000
<v Speaker 2>Ellen Page used there where she talks about how she

0:42:29.080 --> 0:42:31.080
<v Speaker 2>can't believe people regard it as some kind of big

0:42:31.120 --> 0:42:34.280
<v Speaker 2>breaking barriers movie and that Allison's some kind of feminist

0:42:34.480 --> 0:42:37.520
<v Speaker 2>icon or something. I don't think that's something I would argue,

0:42:37.600 --> 0:42:40.319
<v Speaker 2>and I've never heard anyone else argue it. So if

0:42:40.360 --> 0:42:43.320
<v Speaker 2>she was coming to the movie with that weight, expecting

0:42:43.360 --> 0:42:44.760
<v Speaker 2>it to live up to that, I think the movie

0:42:44.760 --> 0:42:48.279
<v Speaker 2>probably really would disappoint I suppose too, I would ask,

0:42:48.320 --> 0:42:51.080
<v Speaker 2>and I'm legitimately asking. I don't have this answer. Maybe

0:42:51.120 --> 0:42:55.000
<v Speaker 2>other people will share their opinion. Is something that is

0:42:55.400 --> 0:43:00.680
<v Speaker 2>not feminist then anti feminist? Because I don't know that

0:43:00.719 --> 0:43:01.400
<v Speaker 2>it's exactly.

0:43:01.800 --> 0:43:03.880
<v Speaker 4>It's beyond that. I mean, it's the makeover.

0:43:04.040 --> 0:43:07.560
<v Speaker 1>The makeover is never no, I agree to an extent.

0:43:07.719 --> 0:43:08.840
<v Speaker 5>It's just a bad trope.

0:43:08.920 --> 0:43:10.840
<v Speaker 1>I agree to an extent. But here's here is my

0:43:10.920 --> 0:43:11.440
<v Speaker 1>one counter.

0:43:11.520 --> 0:43:13.759
<v Speaker 2>And this is my genuine response to it, and it

0:43:13.880 --> 0:43:17.280
<v Speaker 2>was the response when I was a kid. Does Alison

0:43:17.440 --> 0:43:22.040
<v Speaker 2>really change herself for Andy? Is there a transformation or

0:43:22.360 --> 0:43:25.160
<v Speaker 2>more of a reveal of who she really might be?

0:43:25.160 --> 0:43:27.480
<v Speaker 2>Because that's how I see it. I think his comment

0:43:27.600 --> 0:43:31.000
<v Speaker 2>to her is important. The first thing he says to her, actually,

0:43:31.080 --> 0:43:33.520
<v Speaker 2>the first thing he verbalizes is I can see your

0:43:33.560 --> 0:43:37.480
<v Speaker 2>face he finally sees her at the end of the film,

0:43:37.680 --> 0:43:40.120
<v Speaker 2>rather than who she's been up to this point, a girl,

0:43:40.400 --> 0:43:42.680
<v Speaker 2>as I saw it, and as I see it, literally

0:43:42.760 --> 0:43:46.239
<v Speaker 2>hiding behind the unkempt hair and bangs and the black eyeliner.

0:43:46.520 --> 0:43:48.800
<v Speaker 2>So I'd be distressed by it more if that character

0:43:49.239 --> 0:43:51.720
<v Speaker 2>I ever felt was really comfortable in her own skin

0:43:51.920 --> 0:43:54.320
<v Speaker 2>and she compromised her identity to win the affection of

0:43:54.360 --> 0:43:56.800
<v Speaker 2>a boy. But I don't think she compromises her identity

0:43:56.800 --> 0:43:59.839
<v Speaker 2>because she's still trying to discover it, just like everyone else.

0:43:59.880 --> 0:44:02.799
<v Speaker 2>And so, yes, in hindsight, would be better if she

0:44:02.800 --> 0:44:05.239
<v Speaker 2>didn't put the blush on her cheeks? Would it be

0:44:05.239 --> 0:44:07.520
<v Speaker 2>better if maybe she didn't strip down to that pink shirt?

0:44:07.600 --> 0:44:07.799
<v Speaker 5>Yeah?

0:44:07.840 --> 0:44:08.560
<v Speaker 1>Okay, maybe so.

0:44:09.160 --> 0:44:13.040
<v Speaker 2>But for me, it's more about stripping away than adding.

0:44:13.640 --> 0:44:15.840
<v Speaker 2>And I think that's exactly what suggested, is that a

0:44:15.920 --> 0:44:18.880
<v Speaker 2>mask has been removed, not added, by the makeup.

0:44:18.920 --> 0:44:20.799
<v Speaker 4>That could very well be what they were going for,

0:44:20.920 --> 0:44:23.280
<v Speaker 4>but the method they took is hack made and problematic.

0:44:23.520 --> 0:44:24.400
<v Speaker 5>There's no way around that.

0:44:24.840 --> 0:44:26.840
<v Speaker 2>Well, I don't know that I completely buy that, but

0:44:26.880 --> 0:44:29.640
<v Speaker 2>I see the argument I think too. To bolster my argument,

0:44:29.680 --> 0:44:31.920
<v Speaker 2>I'll just say, how great is it that her final

0:44:32.000 --> 0:44:35.720
<v Speaker 2>moment with Andrew is her stealing the patch off his jacket,

0:44:36.000 --> 0:44:38.319
<v Speaker 2>Just in case we thought, well, she's no longer the

0:44:38.320 --> 0:44:40.759
<v Speaker 2>basket case she prettied herself all up. All of her

0:44:40.880 --> 0:44:43.480
<v Speaker 2>problems have been solved by this little makeover, and now

0:44:43.480 --> 0:44:46.200
<v Speaker 2>she's like everyone else, just conforming to the way high

0:44:46.200 --> 0:44:48.400
<v Speaker 2>school is. Nope, she rips off that patch, and I

0:44:48.440 --> 0:44:50.120
<v Speaker 2>just think that's one of those great little touches that

0:44:50.160 --> 0:44:52.919
<v Speaker 2>shows how in sync Hughes was with these characters, even

0:44:52.960 --> 0:44:55.400
<v Speaker 2>after a little bit of misstepping with how that reveal

0:44:55.440 --> 0:44:55.879
<v Speaker 2>goes down.

0:44:55.960 --> 0:44:58.280
<v Speaker 4>Unless she's going to put it on her own letterman jacket,

0:44:58.280 --> 0:45:00.560
<v Speaker 4>you know, then the transformation's completely Maybe.

0:45:00.560 --> 0:45:02.200
<v Speaker 1>That was going to happen. That would be fine, That

0:45:02.239 --> 0:45:02.759
<v Speaker 1>would be fine.

0:45:02.800 --> 0:45:05.719
<v Speaker 2>Okay, there is a lot more I think we could

0:45:05.719 --> 0:45:08.399
<v Speaker 2>talk about with The Breakfast Club, But wow, I think

0:45:08.440 --> 0:45:10.920
<v Speaker 2>we've talked enough, so we cover to go ahead and

0:45:11.560 --> 0:45:18.080
<v Speaker 2>close out there. Oh je up, I'll be.

0:45:19.560 --> 0:45:20.160
<v Speaker 7>I've done so.

0:45:20.600 --> 0:45:26.280
<v Speaker 2>You know, maybe I'm gonna recommend Josh that ten years

0:45:26.320 --> 0:45:30.360
<v Speaker 2>from now we give The Breakfast Club another look, see

0:45:30.360 --> 0:45:33.640
<v Speaker 2>how we come at that movie for its fiftieth anniversary,

0:45:33.719 --> 0:45:36.920
<v Speaker 2>because you know, I'm sure it came up in that conversation.

0:45:37.239 --> 0:45:39.360
<v Speaker 1>I didn't re listen to it. I don't want to

0:45:39.360 --> 0:45:40.160
<v Speaker 1>re listen to it.

0:45:40.320 --> 0:45:43.239
<v Speaker 2>Maybe I will ten years from now and see how

0:45:43.280 --> 0:45:47.120
<v Speaker 2>I wrestled with it upon that revisit. But that movie,

0:45:47.200 --> 0:45:50.080
<v Speaker 2>for me was one of the first movies I remember

0:45:50.200 --> 0:45:56.560
<v Speaker 2>incessantly quoting and thinking was not only hilarious but also profound,

0:45:56.840 --> 0:45:59.319
<v Speaker 2>you know, and I was I was like ten, you know,

0:45:59.480 --> 0:46:03.920
<v Speaker 2>so whatever profound meant at ten, I thought that movie.

0:46:03.600 --> 0:46:06.200
<v Speaker 4>Was it was a peek into the high schooler's life, right,

0:46:06.280 --> 0:46:07.240
<v Speaker 4>that's what you were giving.

0:46:07.680 --> 0:46:07.960
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

0:46:08.000 --> 0:46:08.600
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely.

0:46:09.520 --> 0:46:14.239
<v Speaker 2>Reminder that you can get full archive access over one

0:46:14.239 --> 0:46:17.759
<v Speaker 2>thousand episodes going back to two thousand and five, Get

0:46:17.840 --> 0:46:21.080
<v Speaker 2>him in Spotify, get him in Apple podcasts, whatever player

0:46:21.280 --> 0:46:23.400
<v Speaker 2>you want. You can get that by being a film

0:46:23.400 --> 0:46:27.200
<v Speaker 2>Spotting Family member, plus monthly bonus shows, a weekly newsletter,

0:46:27.600 --> 0:46:30.839
<v Speaker 2>and when we do any event, which we will have

0:46:30.880 --> 0:46:33.719
<v Speaker 2>some events coming up and we think we may have

0:46:33.760 --> 0:46:37.760
<v Speaker 2>another film spotting fest. Film Spotting Family members get early access,

0:46:37.960 --> 0:46:41.799
<v Speaker 2>they get discounts, they get VIP access to things. If

0:46:41.840 --> 0:46:45.120
<v Speaker 2>that sounds interesting to you, sounds like something you'd want, well,

0:46:45.280 --> 0:46:47.920
<v Speaker 2>learn more at Filmspotting Family dot com.

0:46:47.960 --> 0:46:50.960
<v Speaker 3>This conversation can serve no purpose anymore.

0:46:52.000 --> 0:47:12.240
<v Speaker 2>Burn film Spotting is listeners supported. Join the film Spotting

0:47:12.239 --> 0:47:15.040
<v Speaker 2>Family at film Spotting Family dot com and get access

0:47:15.080 --> 0:47:18.520
<v Speaker 2>to ad free episodes, monthly bonus shows, our weekly newsletter,

0:47:18.719 --> 0:47:20.719
<v Speaker 2>and for the first time, all in one place, the

0:47:20.920 --> 0:47:23.919
<v Speaker 2>entire film Spotting archive going back to two thousand and five.

0:47:24.239 --> 0:47:29.600
<v Speaker 2>That's a film spotting, family dot com panically