WEBVTT - Apple Developing Chips for AI Servers, Lyft CEO Talks Growth Plans

0:00:02.520 --> 0:00:09.119
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news from the heart of

0:00:09.200 --> 0:00:14.920
<v Speaker 1>where innovation, money and power collide in Silicon Valley and beyond.

0:00:15.360 --> 0:00:19.680
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Technology with Caroline Hyde and Ed.

0:00:19.720 --> 0:00:35.400
<v Speaker 2>Ludlow, married from New York and San Francisco.

0:00:35.520 --> 0:00:39.159
<v Speaker 3>This is Bloombag Technology coming up. President Trump, he floats

0:00:39.200 --> 0:00:42.720
<v Speaker 3>potentially in eighty percent tariff on China ahead of negotiations

0:00:43.000 --> 0:00:45.640
<v Speaker 3>due to begin Saturday. This has I urged Beijing to

0:00:45.680 --> 0:00:47.920
<v Speaker 3>do more to open up their markets to US goods.

0:00:48.600 --> 0:00:53.360
<v Speaker 4>Plus, Apple's working on youtuip for future devices including smart glasses,

0:00:53.400 --> 0:00:56.400
<v Speaker 4>Powerful max and AI servers, and lift shares.

0:00:56.520 --> 0:00:59.440
<v Speaker 3>Jumping this morning, it's biggest interday rise in November, so

0:00:59.440 --> 0:01:02.760
<v Speaker 3>after the Right and Company reported strong gross bookings in

0:01:02.800 --> 0:01:04.640
<v Speaker 3>their first quarter. But first we check in on these

0:01:04.640 --> 0:01:07.200
<v Speaker 3>markets and we're actually relatively calm.

0:01:07.240 --> 0:01:09.560
<v Speaker 5>We headed towards the weekend when we actually see a.

0:01:09.560 --> 0:01:11.199
<v Speaker 3>Little bit of a draw down on the last past

0:01:11.319 --> 0:01:14.880
<v Speaker 3>five training days. After two phenomenal weeks of gains on

0:01:14.880 --> 0:01:17.400
<v Speaker 3>the NASAQ one hundred, we just trimmed by two tenths

0:01:17.400 --> 0:01:20.000
<v Speaker 3>of a percent. Ed, it's all about tariff's It's all

0:01:20.040 --> 0:01:23.279
<v Speaker 3>about negotiations with China, whether there's any sort of ice breaking.

0:01:24.080 --> 0:01:25.880
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, and that's why I'm looking at Tesla right. I

0:01:25.920 --> 0:01:28.840
<v Speaker 4>don't see a catalyst or a headline driver on the

0:01:28.959 --> 0:01:31.800
<v Speaker 4>terminal this morning, but Tesla is headed for its third

0:01:31.880 --> 0:01:34.600
<v Speaker 4>straight weekly gain. It's the biggest run of gains on

0:01:34.600 --> 0:01:37.800
<v Speaker 4>a weekly basis September. The logic in the last twenty

0:01:37.840 --> 0:01:41.759
<v Speaker 4>four hours has been if the tariff narrative with China improves,

0:01:42.080 --> 0:01:44.320
<v Speaker 4>names like Tesla will see a bit of a reprieve.

0:01:44.560 --> 0:01:48.560
<v Speaker 4>Tesla exports some vehicles from Shanghai. The mix of vehicles

0:01:48.560 --> 0:01:50.760
<v Speaker 4>when more of them come out of Shanghai is higher

0:01:50.800 --> 0:01:54.080
<v Speaker 4>margin for Tesla. Is that the logic that the market's applying.

0:01:54.240 --> 0:01:56.080
<v Speaker 4>What we're trying to do is extrapolate from what the

0:01:56.120 --> 0:01:59.520
<v Speaker 4>President said yesterday about what might happen in the context

0:01:59.560 --> 0:02:01.960
<v Speaker 4>of tariffs, and then he takes the truth Social and

0:02:02.000 --> 0:02:02.400
<v Speaker 4>says some.

0:02:02.400 --> 0:02:03.200
<v Speaker 6>More he does.

0:02:03.320 --> 0:02:06.320
<v Speaker 3>Let's bring up that truth Social post from President Trump

0:02:06.320 --> 0:02:09.840
<v Speaker 3>earlier this morning saying that having eighty percent tariffs on

0:02:09.919 --> 0:02:12.360
<v Speaker 3>China seems about right, and then leaving it up to

0:02:12.360 --> 0:02:15.360
<v Speaker 3>Treasury Secretary Scott Besson. Let's get you the inside track

0:02:15.440 --> 0:02:18.920
<v Speaker 3>with blumbg's Michael Shepherd. Mike look, eighty percent, is that

0:02:19.000 --> 0:02:20.639
<v Speaker 3>a positive or negative for the market.

0:02:22.240 --> 0:02:24.320
<v Speaker 7>Well, you know, if the market, we're looking for a

0:02:24.480 --> 0:02:28.280
<v Speaker 7>big concession on this. They got in absolute terms of

0:02:28.400 --> 0:02:31.600
<v Speaker 7>significant cut from the current one hundred and forty five

0:02:31.639 --> 0:02:34.640
<v Speaker 7>percent tariff level. But keep in mind, Carro, that eighty

0:02:34.680 --> 0:02:37.800
<v Speaker 7>percent tariffs on goods coming in from China is still

0:02:37.840 --> 0:02:40.760
<v Speaker 7>pretty eye watering. It's at a level that would discourage

0:02:40.919 --> 0:02:44.880
<v Speaker 7>most trade. And we've seen companies, including Apple for instance,

0:02:45.400 --> 0:02:49.000
<v Speaker 7>trying to shift their supply chains and supply lines when

0:02:49.040 --> 0:02:52.600
<v Speaker 7>it comes to China to reduce their exposure to China

0:02:52.720 --> 0:02:56.360
<v Speaker 7>when it comes to goods exported to the US. And

0:02:56.400 --> 0:02:59.480
<v Speaker 7>it's interesting that the President is also framing this as

0:02:59.520 --> 0:03:02.639
<v Speaker 7>a challenge to China to open its markets, even as

0:03:02.720 --> 0:03:06.560
<v Speaker 7>he is maintaining what would be a historically high barrier there.

0:03:07.840 --> 0:03:11.079
<v Speaker 4>Mike, the President, indeed, the British Ambassador to the US,

0:03:11.200 --> 0:03:13.800
<v Speaker 4>Peter Manerlson, kind of framed this as a great deal,

0:03:14.160 --> 0:03:18.760
<v Speaker 4>the ten level tariff UK to US. But what everyone

0:03:18.840 --> 0:03:20.919
<v Speaker 4>kept asking in the Q and A is is this

0:03:21.040 --> 0:03:24.280
<v Speaker 4>the template for your other negotiations? And I think the

0:03:24.320 --> 0:03:27.800
<v Speaker 4>President basically said ten percent's a great deal. It won't

0:03:27.880 --> 0:03:29.840
<v Speaker 4>be like that for other countries.

0:03:30.639 --> 0:03:32.840
<v Speaker 7>Well, that's right, ed, and that really is the question

0:03:33.040 --> 0:03:36.480
<v Speaker 7>on the minds of trading partners and companies around the world.

0:03:36.520 --> 0:03:39.200
<v Speaker 7>They want to know, how do we negotiate with this

0:03:39.240 --> 0:03:43.320
<v Speaker 7>administration that has come in really elbows out on trade

0:03:43.360 --> 0:03:46.280
<v Speaker 7>from the start. And what we heard from Howard Lutnik

0:03:46.360 --> 0:03:48.680
<v Speaker 7>last night was that, look, this may not be a

0:03:48.720 --> 0:03:51.880
<v Speaker 7>template per se, but it is a roadmac It gives

0:03:51.960 --> 0:03:55.480
<v Speaker 7>a sort of frame two other countries to trading partners

0:03:55.480 --> 0:03:57.960
<v Speaker 7>about what sorts of concessions.

0:03:57.280 --> 0:03:59.760
<v Speaker 8>The Trump administration might be looking for.

0:04:00.080 --> 0:04:02.040
<v Speaker 7>When it comes to the UK, they came in with

0:04:02.080 --> 0:04:05.040
<v Speaker 7>some offers that were quite appealing to Donald Trump.

0:04:05.320 --> 0:04:07.840
<v Speaker 8>Won the UK agreed to buy.

0:04:07.840 --> 0:04:11.440
<v Speaker 7>Thirteen billion dollars worth of Boeing aircraft, very much music

0:04:11.560 --> 0:04:14.640
<v Speaker 7>to his ears as he tries to stoke the manufacturing

0:04:14.720 --> 0:04:18.800
<v Speaker 7>base here in the US, and also some agricultural concessions too,

0:04:19.120 --> 0:04:23.080
<v Speaker 7>with promises to increase purchases of American beef. So between

0:04:23.279 --> 0:04:26.280
<v Speaker 7>beef and airplanes, the UK found a way to get

0:04:26.279 --> 0:04:29.320
<v Speaker 7>that reciprocal tariff lowered all the way to ten percent.

0:04:29.600 --> 0:04:32.080
<v Speaker 7>That may not be the case with other countries, and

0:04:32.120 --> 0:04:35.599
<v Speaker 7>certainly negotiations with South Korea and Japan, which have a

0:04:35.640 --> 0:04:39.000
<v Speaker 7>heavy tech exposure and interest, will face a much tougher

0:04:39.040 --> 0:04:40.360
<v Speaker 7>and more complicated road.

0:04:40.400 --> 0:04:43.760
<v Speaker 8>How link indicated yesterday ed boom both.

0:04:43.800 --> 0:04:46.000
<v Speaker 9>Michael Shepherd in Washington, d C. Thank you.

0:04:46.360 --> 0:04:50.840
<v Speaker 4>In other news, China's top chip maker, Semiconductor Manufacturing International,

0:04:51.240 --> 0:04:54.560
<v Speaker 4>plunged Friday after it worn sales could fall as much

0:04:54.600 --> 0:04:56.960
<v Speaker 4>as six percent this quarter because.

0:04:56.680 --> 0:04:58.040
<v Speaker 9>Of production disruptions.

0:04:58.240 --> 0:05:03.120
<v Speaker 4>The company's co CEO unspecified issues with production lines and

0:05:03.200 --> 0:05:06.480
<v Speaker 4>warned of a likely shipment correction in the smartphone market

0:05:06.720 --> 0:05:07.440
<v Speaker 4>over the summer.

0:05:07.520 --> 0:05:08.760
<v Speaker 5>Carrot more on smartphones.

0:05:08.839 --> 0:05:10.840
<v Speaker 3>Let's turn to Apple, but actually the tech giant is

0:05:10.880 --> 0:05:12.800
<v Speaker 3>said to be designing new chips to be used in

0:05:12.839 --> 0:05:16.520
<v Speaker 3>future devices, smart glasses, more powerful max AI servers.

0:05:16.960 --> 0:05:18.160
<v Speaker 5>Let's get to Mark German.

0:05:17.960 --> 0:05:20.680
<v Speaker 3>Who's been breaking all of this news, and finally, well,

0:05:20.720 --> 0:05:22.640
<v Speaker 3>those meta ray bands are going to have some competition,

0:05:22.680 --> 0:05:23.960
<v Speaker 3>but it'll take a couple of years.

0:05:25.080 --> 0:05:26.120
<v Speaker 6>That's the big news here.

0:05:26.160 --> 0:05:29.440
<v Speaker 10>The meta smart glasses will have some competition from Apple.

0:05:29.760 --> 0:05:32.520
<v Speaker 10>Apple has been working on glasses projects for some time,

0:05:32.600 --> 0:05:36.720
<v Speaker 10>including classes without augmented reality like the metas, and glasses

0:05:37.000 --> 0:05:40.080
<v Speaker 10>with augmented reality. Those are coming further down the road.

0:05:40.320 --> 0:05:42.360
<v Speaker 10>But you need a product to hold you over till then.

0:05:42.600 --> 0:05:46.120
<v Speaker 10>They've seen the metas are popular. They've seen that artificial

0:05:46.160 --> 0:05:48.240
<v Speaker 10>intelligence is going to be a big part of hardware.

0:05:48.279 --> 0:05:50.599
<v Speaker 10>So they're going down this road. And as they've done

0:05:50.600 --> 0:05:53.479
<v Speaker 10>with other new product categories, they're developing a custom chip

0:05:53.920 --> 0:05:55.960
<v Speaker 10>for these glasses. And this chip is based on the

0:05:56.000 --> 0:05:57.200
<v Speaker 10>Apple Watch processor.

0:05:57.880 --> 0:05:58.159
<v Speaker 6>Right.

0:05:58.240 --> 0:06:02.000
<v Speaker 10>It has special components in there too to increase power efficiency,

0:06:02.480 --> 0:06:06.200
<v Speaker 10>decrease power draw, and control multiple cameras that would be

0:06:06.240 --> 0:06:09.039
<v Speaker 10>on the exterior of these glasses, and they would work

0:06:09.200 --> 0:06:11.400
<v Speaker 10>like metas where you can look at items and ask

0:06:11.480 --> 0:06:14.320
<v Speaker 10>it for context using Siri mark.

0:06:14.400 --> 0:06:18.360
<v Speaker 4>Generally speaking, this is consistent with apple strategy on custom silicon. Right,

0:06:18.800 --> 0:06:21.840
<v Speaker 4>many of the processes across the range of devices are

0:06:21.880 --> 0:06:26.680
<v Speaker 4>Apple's own and I believe made by TSMC, fabricated by TSMC.

0:06:27.080 --> 0:06:29.240
<v Speaker 4>Just explain Apple's footprint in that sense.

0:06:30.640 --> 0:06:32.760
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, the Apple for footprint is that they have their

0:06:32.800 --> 0:06:36.360
<v Speaker 10>own custom processors and basically every device they sell. They

0:06:36.520 --> 0:06:39.560
<v Speaker 10>moved away from Intel in twenty twenty. For the Mac,

0:06:39.640 --> 0:06:42.320
<v Speaker 10>the Mac now has these high end M series processors,

0:06:42.360 --> 0:06:45.320
<v Speaker 10>the Vision Pro and the iPad of the M series processors.

0:06:45.360 --> 0:06:48.320
<v Speaker 10>At this point, the iPhone and the lower and iPads

0:06:48.320 --> 0:06:50.640
<v Speaker 10>have the A series processors. They make their own chips

0:06:50.680 --> 0:06:54.000
<v Speaker 10>for AirPods for Apple watches, and so of course they're

0:06:54.040 --> 0:06:56.200
<v Speaker 10>going to do it for the glasses as well as

0:06:56.240 --> 0:07:01.560
<v Speaker 10>a significant product category within that vision brand in our likelihood,

0:07:01.760 --> 0:07:03.840
<v Speaker 10>and they used here and C like you said, for

0:07:03.960 --> 0:07:07.120
<v Speaker 10>that final manufacturing. But much of the design is done

0:07:07.200 --> 0:07:10.600
<v Speaker 10>in house from Apple in their labs across Europe, across

0:07:10.640 --> 0:07:13.720
<v Speaker 10>the United States, and they do have a license with

0:07:13.960 --> 0:07:17.480
<v Speaker 10>ARM and they use fundamental underlying technologies from ARM.

0:07:17.920 --> 0:07:19.880
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, many people talk to me about Apple in the

0:07:19.920 --> 0:07:22.600
<v Speaker 4>context of it being a fabulous chip designer in its

0:07:22.640 --> 0:07:25.760
<v Speaker 4>own right, which is a fascinating move. Bloomberg, Mark German,

0:07:25.760 --> 0:07:27.680
<v Speaker 4>thank you very much. Now coming up, we're going to

0:07:27.720 --> 0:07:30.200
<v Speaker 4>speak with the Lift CEO, David risher Is. The company

0:07:30.240 --> 0:07:33.960
<v Speaker 4>posts better than expected gross bookings for the first quarter.

0:07:34.320 --> 0:07:36.080
<v Speaker 9>This is Bloomberg Technology.

0:07:43.520 --> 0:07:44.520
<v Speaker 5>Time now for talking tech.

0:07:44.560 --> 0:07:46.520
<v Speaker 3>And first up, as you see shares a crowd strike

0:07:46.720 --> 0:07:51.520
<v Speaker 3>lower today, US prosecutors regulators, they are proving senior executors

0:07:51.880 --> 0:07:55.600
<v Speaker 3>over what may have been known by them about it's

0:07:55.640 --> 0:07:59.040
<v Speaker 3>thirty two million dollar deal with Carasoft into the IRS.

0:07:59.360 --> 0:08:01.600
<v Speaker 3>Now that's a quarter to sources. Investigators are looking into

0:08:01.640 --> 0:08:04.280
<v Speaker 3>other transactions made by CrowdStrike and said to have.

0:08:04.320 --> 0:08:05.640
<v Speaker 5>Questioned former employees.

0:08:06.120 --> 0:08:08.920
<v Speaker 3>Plus TSMC rising today is the company posted a revenue

0:08:08.960 --> 0:08:11.400
<v Speaker 3>jump of forty eight percent in April. This has companies

0:08:11.520 --> 0:08:15.360
<v Speaker 3>increased purchases of essential components ahead of global tariffs. TSMC

0:08:15.520 --> 0:08:19.080
<v Speaker 3>says that they see continued resilient demand from ai but

0:08:19.200 --> 0:08:21.920
<v Speaker 3>recent surgeons in Taiwan's dollar that compression of the company's

0:08:21.920 --> 0:08:25.720
<v Speaker 3>margins going forward, and Panasonic is cutting ten thousand jobs

0:08:25.760 --> 0:08:28.640
<v Speaker 3>and an effort to boost profitability, shifting focus into growth

0:08:28.640 --> 0:08:31.480
<v Speaker 3>areas now. The four percent workforce reduction can see five

0:08:31.480 --> 0:08:34.440
<v Speaker 3>thousand employees in Japan and five thousand overseas.

0:08:33.880 --> 0:08:35.920
<v Speaker 5>Personnel if they let go in the fiscal year.

0:08:36.240 --> 0:08:39.360
<v Speaker 3>Panasonic expects about eight hundred and ninety five million dollars

0:08:39.400 --> 0:08:40.960
<v Speaker 3>in restructuring charges this year.

0:08:41.320 --> 0:08:44.400
<v Speaker 4>ED Let's Go Back to Technology earning shares of LIFT

0:08:44.480 --> 0:08:47.520
<v Speaker 4>up around twenty percent so far today, on track for

0:08:47.520 --> 0:08:51.040
<v Speaker 4>their biggest jumps since November, company posting a better than

0:08:51.080 --> 0:08:54.080
<v Speaker 4>expected gross bookings of four point one six billion dollars,

0:08:54.400 --> 0:08:58.720
<v Speaker 4>and Little Sweetener announced an expanded share by Back program.

0:08:59.160 --> 0:09:02.360
<v Speaker 9>LIFT CEO Dave joins us for more. Good morning, David.

0:09:02.440 --> 0:09:05.560
<v Speaker 4>There's something really interesting in your kind of forward looking

0:09:05.559 --> 0:09:08.840
<v Speaker 4>strategy commentary on the cool Uber talks about something the same.

0:09:08.880 --> 0:09:12.760
<v Speaker 4>There are parts of this country, America where ride share

0:09:13.120 --> 0:09:16.400
<v Speaker 4>is less pervasive, people don't use as much, probably they

0:09:16.480 --> 0:09:17.280
<v Speaker 4>drive their own car.

0:09:17.640 --> 0:09:22.199
<v Speaker 9>You want to go after that market? Why and how so?

0:09:22.320 --> 0:09:26.199
<v Speaker 11>The answer is, we've gotten really good at obsessing over

0:09:26.240 --> 0:09:28.880
<v Speaker 11>our customers and we want to take it bigger and

0:09:28.920 --> 0:09:32.560
<v Speaker 11>go bigger. I mean, look, this is our sixteenth consecutive.

0:09:31.960 --> 0:09:34.920
<v Speaker 12>Quarter of growth. You know, we're a profitable.

0:09:34.480 --> 0:09:37.640
<v Speaker 11>Company, We're you know, generating nine hundred million dollars of cash,

0:09:37.720 --> 0:09:40.920
<v Speaker 11>and yet yet the rideshare market are still tiny. One

0:09:41.000 --> 0:09:43.320
<v Speaker 11>hundred and sixty billion rides in the United States every

0:09:43.360 --> 0:09:45.439
<v Speaker 11>year and we only do a couple three billion between

0:09:45.480 --> 0:09:47.680
<v Speaker 11>the two of us. So there's so much opportunity. It

0:09:47.720 --> 0:09:49.000
<v Speaker 11>really is better to be in the back of the

0:09:49.000 --> 0:09:50.920
<v Speaker 11>car having someone else drive you, and we want to

0:09:51.000 --> 0:09:53.880
<v Speaker 11>do it in places like Indianapolis and others where you know,

0:09:53.920 --> 0:09:56.480
<v Speaker 11>the opportunities even bigger cash.

0:09:56.720 --> 0:09:59.160
<v Speaker 4>When last year on which was just a few weeks ago,

0:09:59.559 --> 0:10:01.439
<v Speaker 4>we were talk talking about M and A in Europe,

0:10:01.440 --> 0:10:04.680
<v Speaker 4>and with respect, it was a modest deal. The buy

0:10:04.720 --> 0:10:09.160
<v Speaker 4>back is clearly well received by your investors. Yeah, but

0:10:09.520 --> 0:10:12.200
<v Speaker 4>that would indicate that you have some ability to do

0:10:12.360 --> 0:10:15.080
<v Speaker 4>m and a going forward you know, do you see

0:10:15.120 --> 0:10:18.240
<v Speaker 4>that in your capital plans? And if you did buy something,

0:10:18.240 --> 0:10:19.000
<v Speaker 4>what would it be.

0:10:19.760 --> 0:10:22.959
<v Speaker 11>So, so, first, thanks for acknowledging it's true. I mean,

0:10:22.960 --> 0:10:25.120
<v Speaker 11>this is a business that is now generating nearly a

0:10:25.160 --> 0:10:27.800
<v Speaker 11>billion of dollars of cash in the trailing twelve months.

0:10:27.840 --> 0:10:29.120
<v Speaker 12>So that's a wonderful place to be.

0:10:29.960 --> 0:10:33.160
<v Speaker 11>Again, huge thanks to the incredible team that has been

0:10:33.160 --> 0:10:35.520
<v Speaker 11>working so dang hard to make this business not only

0:10:35.520 --> 0:10:37.560
<v Speaker 11>great for customers, but great for shareholders as well.

0:10:38.200 --> 0:10:40.280
<v Speaker 12>So now the question is, right, what are other opportunities?

0:10:40.320 --> 0:10:42.760
<v Speaker 11>I would say our near term focus is making the

0:10:42.760 --> 0:10:44.800
<v Speaker 11>cash that we've got, you know, putting it to work.

0:10:45.080 --> 0:10:47.080
<v Speaker 11>As you say, we just acquired free Now, which will

0:10:47.120 --> 0:10:48.680
<v Speaker 11>allow us to expand internationally.

0:10:49.320 --> 0:10:50.040
<v Speaker 12>You know, nothing more.

0:10:49.920 --> 0:10:53.199
<v Speaker 11>Obviously to announce right now, aside from the buyback, of course,

0:10:53.600 --> 0:10:55.079
<v Speaker 11>but it's great to be in a strong position. We've

0:10:55.080 --> 0:10:57.040
<v Speaker 11>got a strong balance sheet and a strong income statement,

0:10:57.120 --> 0:10:58.920
<v Speaker 11>so it feels that's a good place to be and.

0:10:58.840 --> 0:11:00.680
<v Speaker 3>It's a strong position that you manage to defend off

0:11:00.880 --> 0:11:05.120
<v Speaker 3>engine capital, David, in terms of they were a pushy

0:11:05.320 --> 0:11:08.800
<v Speaker 3>investor wanting changes potentially a board level, but they've withdrawn

0:11:08.880 --> 0:11:10.960
<v Speaker 3>that because of what you've given to the investor base

0:11:11.080 --> 0:11:12.320
<v Speaker 3>in terms of buybacks, David.

0:11:12.360 --> 0:11:13.320
<v Speaker 5>Is that a cyber relief?

0:11:15.160 --> 0:11:17.720
<v Speaker 12>I mean, you know, we talk to investors all the time.

0:11:19.320 --> 0:11:21.640
<v Speaker 11>I would say maybe not so much the cyber relief

0:11:21.679 --> 0:11:24.400
<v Speaker 11>as much as just it absolutely allows us to continue

0:11:24.400 --> 0:11:26.400
<v Speaker 11>to focus on our riders and our drivers.

0:11:26.400 --> 0:11:27.280
<v Speaker 12>That's sort of the big thing.

0:11:27.920 --> 0:11:30.080
<v Speaker 11>But it's great that investors are responding so well to

0:11:30.160 --> 0:11:32.120
<v Speaker 11>what it is that we're doing. Again, share buy back

0:11:32.240 --> 0:11:35.920
<v Speaker 11>is great. You know, profitable growth, you know, quarter after quarter,

0:11:36.000 --> 0:11:36.480
<v Speaker 11>that's great.

0:11:36.720 --> 0:11:38.160
<v Speaker 12>And this is what I've always said, it's.

0:11:38.040 --> 0:11:40.960
<v Speaker 11>Customer obsession that drives profitable growth, and we're sort of

0:11:40.960 --> 0:11:42.480
<v Speaker 11>seeing that play out now.

0:11:42.640 --> 0:11:46.400
<v Speaker 3>And that customer obsession drives innovation, drives autonomous vehicles. I

0:11:46.440 --> 0:11:48.680
<v Speaker 3>know you're looking at Atlanta, You've got a partnership there.

0:11:49.040 --> 0:11:52.280
<v Speaker 3>How much are you're going to see driverless vehicles automatically

0:11:52.280 --> 0:11:54.040
<v Speaker 3>you're going to have safety drivers in the car.

0:11:54.240 --> 0:11:55.760
<v Speaker 5>What is that going to look like as a pilot.

0:11:56.880 --> 0:11:59.000
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, so this is a pilot that we're doing with

0:11:59.000 --> 0:12:02.240
<v Speaker 11>main Mobility set back. Autonomous vehicles are going to come.

0:12:02.360 --> 0:12:04.640
<v Speaker 11>Right they're here in San Francisco, you see them everywhere.

0:12:04.679 --> 0:12:07.600
<v Speaker 11>They're obviously in La and Austin and other places as well.

0:12:07.880 --> 0:12:08.320
<v Speaker 12>They'll come.

0:12:08.480 --> 0:12:10.720
<v Speaker 11>It'll be many, many years before they're a big deal,

0:12:10.760 --> 0:12:13.160
<v Speaker 11>but as they come, it's such a great opportunity for

0:12:13.240 --> 0:12:14.960
<v Speaker 11>ride share and for a lyft because it allows us

0:12:15.000 --> 0:12:18.319
<v Speaker 11>to you know, provide better service, you know, using different technologies.

0:12:18.559 --> 0:12:19.360
<v Speaker 12>As you say, we'll be.

0:12:19.320 --> 0:12:22.040
<v Speaker 11>Starting in Lantam in a couple of months, middle of

0:12:22.040 --> 0:12:24.200
<v Speaker 11>the summer. We will start with a sort of a

0:12:24.240 --> 0:12:26.240
<v Speaker 11>confidence driver, someone else in the car to kind of

0:12:26.240 --> 0:12:28.520
<v Speaker 11>help make sure that people feel comfortable.

0:12:28.080 --> 0:12:29.000
<v Speaker 12>With what's going on there.

0:12:29.160 --> 0:12:31.360
<v Speaker 11>It'll be a fairly small scale pilot, but this is

0:12:31.360 --> 0:12:34.040
<v Speaker 11>something it'll grow into Texas next year with a partnership

0:12:34.080 --> 0:12:36.200
<v Speaker 11>with mobil I and others, and then we'll.

0:12:36.080 --> 0:12:37.760
<v Speaker 12>Just keep building and building and building.

0:12:37.559 --> 0:12:40.120
<v Speaker 11>To the point where drivers are driving millions of people

0:12:40.200 --> 0:12:42.600
<v Speaker 11>and autonomous vehicles are driving millions of people as well.

0:12:42.760 --> 0:12:45.360
<v Speaker 4>David, you're a technology CEO, and as such you must

0:12:45.400 --> 0:12:49.400
<v Speaker 4>field questions on economics and the state of trade and travel.

0:12:50.920 --> 0:12:51.959
<v Speaker 9>It's our favorite thing to do.

0:12:53.240 --> 0:12:56.360
<v Speaker 4>Squ Uber reflected on the idea of cross border travel

0:12:56.400 --> 0:12:59.480
<v Speaker 4>Canada into the US, the inbound travel into the US

0:12:59.520 --> 0:13:03.200
<v Speaker 4>being soft business travel. People arrive at airports, are they

0:13:03.280 --> 0:13:04.960
<v Speaker 4>or are they not doing ride share? What are you

0:13:05.080 --> 0:13:08.199
<v Speaker 4>seeing through the consumer about the state of this economy.

0:13:08.559 --> 0:13:10.360
<v Speaker 12>I don't say we're seeing strength. And I know a

0:13:10.360 --> 0:13:12.720
<v Speaker 12>lot of people are trying to look granula where why?

0:13:13.360 --> 0:13:15.600
<v Speaker 11>So I'll give you a couple of examples. Let's actually

0:13:15.600 --> 0:13:17.920
<v Speaker 11>go back literally to earlier this week Sinkle demyle, right,

0:13:18.000 --> 0:13:20.400
<v Speaker 11>that's not a holiday, that's necessarily a huge thing. But

0:13:20.440 --> 0:13:22.160
<v Speaker 11>at the same time we saw one of our biggest

0:13:22.160 --> 0:13:24.400
<v Speaker 11>sink of demios ever, it's a very very strong day.

0:13:24.480 --> 0:13:25.840
<v Speaker 12>Let's go back to the end of March.

0:13:25.880 --> 0:13:27.920
<v Speaker 11>Last week in March was actually our strongest week ever

0:13:27.960 --> 0:13:30.240
<v Speaker 11>in terms of ride value. I think what we're seeing

0:13:30.280 --> 0:13:33.680
<v Speaker 11>here is ride share has become a very sort of

0:13:34.000 --> 0:13:37.000
<v Speaker 11>base staple part of so many people's lives that I

0:13:37.080 --> 0:13:40.480
<v Speaker 11>don't really expect a sort of consumer sentiment fluctuates around

0:13:40.640 --> 0:13:42.960
<v Speaker 11>to see that much difference. I'll talk about airports for

0:13:43.040 --> 0:13:45.640
<v Speaker 11>just a second, because you asked airports basically quarter to

0:13:45.760 --> 0:13:49.040
<v Speaker 11>quarter are flat. It is true, consumer, excuse me, the

0:13:49.040 --> 0:13:51.240
<v Speaker 11>commute is going up faster, so if you look at

0:13:51.240 --> 0:13:53.240
<v Speaker 11>it that way, consumer's growing a little bit faster.

0:13:53.480 --> 0:13:54.920
<v Speaker 12>Excuse me, commute, I keep saying that.

0:13:55.040 --> 0:13:57.920
<v Speaker 11>But you know, again, even when you look at airports, gosh,

0:13:57.960 --> 0:13:59.840
<v Speaker 11>it's only one in five people use rightdchhair to get

0:13:59.880 --> 0:14:02.080
<v Speaker 11>to reports in the first place. That means eighty percent

0:14:02.160 --> 0:14:04.000
<v Speaker 11>is still out there for sort of the you know,

0:14:04.360 --> 0:14:06.440
<v Speaker 11>the picking. So I think our big focus is trying

0:14:06.480 --> 0:14:08.680
<v Speaker 11>to expand the market. I don't think that the macro

0:14:08.720 --> 0:14:10.120
<v Speaker 11>stuff is a big deal right now for us.

0:14:10.559 --> 0:14:12.280
<v Speaker 5>You're growing in Canada, David.

0:14:12.320 --> 0:14:14.439
<v Speaker 3>And it's interesting I've asked this time and time again

0:14:14.840 --> 0:14:17.280
<v Speaker 3>a start of IBM asked, a vouba ask of a view.

0:14:17.679 --> 0:14:20.200
<v Speaker 3>Is there any impact from being an American brand going

0:14:20.200 --> 0:14:22.280
<v Speaker 3>into a country such as Canada right now?

0:14:22.320 --> 0:14:25.920
<v Speaker 5>Because we are hearing of pushback thirty seconds you know, it's.

0:14:25.760 --> 0:14:28.000
<v Speaker 12>So interesting, No, is the real answer.

0:14:28.040 --> 0:14:31.720
<v Speaker 11>In fact, we've just got authorization to open in Quebec,

0:14:32.040 --> 0:14:34.000
<v Speaker 11>in the province of Quebec, which which we might have

0:14:34.040 --> 0:14:36.080
<v Speaker 11>wondered whether it was going to happen given everything going on.

0:14:36.200 --> 0:14:38.880
<v Speaker 11>So no, we've actually seen acceptance. Actually, Toronto's a big

0:14:38.880 --> 0:14:39.320
<v Speaker 11>city for.

0:14:39.320 --> 0:14:42.200
<v Speaker 3>Us, going super well, David Risher, so great to catch

0:14:42.280 --> 0:14:43.520
<v Speaker 3>up with you Thinbous some the numbers.

0:14:43.520 --> 0:14:44.240
<v Speaker 5>We appreciate it.

0:14:44.440 --> 0:14:53.160
<v Speaker 11>Lift to see it is a pleasure, Thanks you guys.

0:14:55.800 --> 0:14:59.240
<v Speaker 4>Pinterest ches up after the company reported second quarter revenue

0:14:59.280 --> 0:15:03.040
<v Speaker 4>guidance that beat expectations and told analysts the platform was

0:15:03.120 --> 0:15:07.880
<v Speaker 4>leveraging AI to attract advertisers. CEO Bill Ready spoke to Bloomberg.

0:15:07.480 --> 0:15:10.280
<v Speaker 6>Earlier, pintresses where gen Z goes to shop.

0:15:10.400 --> 0:15:13.280
<v Speaker 13>Gen Z is now our largest fastest growing demographic, over

0:15:13.320 --> 0:15:16.200
<v Speaker 13>forty percent of our users. And you know they're coming

0:15:16.280 --> 0:15:19.000
<v Speaker 13>here to shop. We're giving them a great shopping destination.

0:15:19.880 --> 0:15:22.400
<v Speaker 13>But you know that has allowed us to deliver great

0:15:22.840 --> 0:15:26.880
<v Speaker 13>performance for our advertisers. We've delivered a performance advertising platform

0:15:27.080 --> 0:15:30.240
<v Speaker 13>where advertisers can get clicks and conversions and great performance.

0:15:30.240 --> 0:15:32.520
<v Speaker 13>We're giving them AI enabled tools, so it's easier than

0:15:32.560 --> 0:15:35.560
<v Speaker 13>ever for them to go create campaigns on Pinterest and

0:15:35.840 --> 0:15:38.240
<v Speaker 13>see really great returns on that. So that's the other

0:15:38.280 --> 0:15:39.960
<v Speaker 13>side of the business is that we've made Pinterest a

0:15:39.960 --> 0:15:42.880
<v Speaker 13>shopping destination. Eighty five percent of our users come to

0:15:42.960 --> 0:15:46.160
<v Speaker 13>us directly, and then we connect them with advertisers to

0:15:46.200 --> 0:15:48.640
<v Speaker 13>make it really easy for advertisers to connect with those users.

0:15:48.640 --> 0:15:51.400
<v Speaker 13>In this moment where they're in market looking for something

0:15:51.400 --> 0:15:53.560
<v Speaker 13>to buy but haven't decided what to buy. That's a

0:15:53.600 --> 0:15:56.760
<v Speaker 13>great moment for those two to meet, and we see

0:15:56.760 --> 0:15:59.960
<v Speaker 13>that continue to accelerate. We're all time highs on users

0:16:00.280 --> 0:16:03.000
<v Speaker 13>and all time highs on depth of engagement per user,

0:16:03.280 --> 0:16:06.480
<v Speaker 13>really driven by AI and the personalization there and then

0:16:06.480 --> 0:16:08.920
<v Speaker 13>how we're connecting shoppers and sellers.

0:16:09.040 --> 0:16:11.760
<v Speaker 3>So, is that keeping the likes of Timu and Sin

0:16:11.920 --> 0:16:14.440
<v Speaker 3>who a lot of those gen zs are going to

0:16:14.800 --> 0:16:16.040
<v Speaker 3>buy on your platform?

0:16:16.360 --> 0:16:18.800
<v Speaker 5>Is that sticking around because many had worried.

0:16:18.560 --> 0:16:21.520
<v Speaker 3>Because of the towers, because of the difficulty accessing the

0:16:21.600 --> 0:16:24.120
<v Speaker 3>US and consumer in terms of price point, what we'd

0:16:24.160 --> 0:16:26.560
<v Speaker 3>see retrenchment in terms of ads from those companies.

0:16:26.720 --> 0:16:29.200
<v Speaker 13>Yeah, Well, we're a global platform. You know, we're overre

0:16:29.240 --> 0:16:32.480
<v Speaker 13>you know, five hundred and seventy million users. Eighty percent

0:16:32.520 --> 0:16:34.720
<v Speaker 13>of those are outside the US, and so we noted

0:16:34.760 --> 0:16:38.040
<v Speaker 13>as others that for Asian cross border sellers, you know,

0:16:38.080 --> 0:16:40.200
<v Speaker 13>that has slowed down coming into the US, as others

0:16:40.200 --> 0:16:43.080
<v Speaker 13>have noted as well. But we're seeing those sellers sell

0:16:43.160 --> 0:16:45.120
<v Speaker 13>more globally and we're helping them to connect to other

0:16:45.160 --> 0:16:48.960
<v Speaker 13>markets around the world. Here in the US consumers are resilient.

0:16:49.560 --> 0:16:51.800
<v Speaker 13>You know, there's lots of public spending information that says

0:16:51.880 --> 0:16:54.160
<v Speaker 13>that consumers are still shopping. We went through a major

0:16:54.200 --> 0:16:56.600
<v Speaker 13>supply chain destruction just a few years ago during the pandemic,

0:16:57.040 --> 0:16:59.040
<v Speaker 13>and you know, we all saw, you know, things are

0:16:59.040 --> 0:17:02.360
<v Speaker 13>out of stock and consumers found other ways to buy,

0:17:02.400 --> 0:17:03.200
<v Speaker 13>other things to buy.

0:17:03.560 --> 0:17:05.040
<v Speaker 6>And we see that happening on our platform.

0:17:05.080 --> 0:17:08.399
<v Speaker 13>That while you have things like budget conscious searches like

0:17:08.800 --> 0:17:12.840
<v Speaker 13>you know, budget friendly recipes or you know budget you know,

0:17:12.920 --> 0:17:16.320
<v Speaker 13>party decorations, budget party favors, and those kinds of things

0:17:16.359 --> 0:17:19.120
<v Speaker 13>up two hundred percent plus here on here. People find

0:17:19.160 --> 0:17:21.840
<v Speaker 13>substitute products, they find other ways to go sort of

0:17:21.840 --> 0:17:25.160
<v Speaker 13>bring delight into their life, and we're a great place

0:17:25.200 --> 0:17:26.520
<v Speaker 13>to help them do that, in a great place for

0:17:26.560 --> 0:17:30.560
<v Speaker 13>advertisers to see these shifting consumer trends.

0:17:30.600 --> 0:17:33.320
<v Speaker 3>Bill Ready speaking to us earlier, and let's just stick

0:17:33.359 --> 0:17:36.080
<v Speaker 3>with earnings, with the consumer sentiment as well. Let's go

0:17:36.119 --> 0:17:38.480
<v Speaker 3>to buy now, pay later company. A firm look shares

0:17:38.520 --> 0:17:40.880
<v Speaker 3>our trading lower, but they actually increase guidance.

0:17:40.920 --> 0:17:42.440
<v Speaker 5>A firm CEO, Max Livtin is.

0:17:42.400 --> 0:17:44.840
<v Speaker 3>Here with US analysts calling this a knee jerk reaction

0:17:45.080 --> 0:17:48.359
<v Speaker 3>and ultimately maybe some lofty expectations. But are you, like Bill,

0:17:48.480 --> 0:17:50.960
<v Speaker 3>are you still seeing the consumer spending right now?

0:17:51.280 --> 0:17:53.119
<v Speaker 14>We are, We really are, He's He's exactly at A

0:17:53.160 --> 0:17:56.080
<v Speaker 14>couldn't agree more. US consumer has been resilient. They found

0:17:56.160 --> 0:17:58.159
<v Speaker 14>new things to buy, new things to be excited about.

0:17:58.680 --> 0:18:01.240
<v Speaker 14>We're seeing really strong growth, which is posted three six

0:18:01.240 --> 0:18:04.440
<v Speaker 14>percent GMB growth and that's a third quarter in a

0:18:04.480 --> 0:18:08.960
<v Speaker 14>row acceleration. So the rumors of US consumer decline are

0:18:08.960 --> 0:18:10.520
<v Speaker 14>somewhat exaggerated, it seems.

0:18:10.600 --> 0:18:12.920
<v Speaker 5>And maybe it's lofty expectations.

0:18:12.960 --> 0:18:14.240
<v Speaker 3>I'm sure you're going to tell me you don't check

0:18:14.280 --> 0:18:15.879
<v Speaker 3>in on the shares very much, but when you do

0:18:15.920 --> 0:18:18.680
<v Speaker 3>see sentiment like this on the back of your numbers, what.

0:18:18.640 --> 0:18:21.720
<v Speaker 5>Do you think investors are shying away from? Is it competition?

0:18:23.240 --> 0:18:23.399
<v Speaker 12>You know?

0:18:23.880 --> 0:18:26.880
<v Speaker 14>Hard for me to tell. I try not to check

0:18:26.920 --> 0:18:29.360
<v Speaker 14>too often. I primarily care about it from the point

0:18:29.359 --> 0:18:31.320
<v Speaker 14>of view of the team feeling that their hard work

0:18:31.440 --> 0:18:32.960
<v Speaker 14>is actually understood by the market.

0:18:32.960 --> 0:18:34.880
<v Speaker 6>And I think it.

0:18:34.720 --> 0:18:38.960
<v Speaker 14>Took our consumers and our merchant partners about a decade

0:18:39.040 --> 0:18:41.760
<v Speaker 14>to fully grasp just how different and how a creative

0:18:41.760 --> 0:18:45.399
<v Speaker 14>we are to their sales, and just how powerful this

0:18:45.440 --> 0:18:48.240
<v Speaker 14>whole new idea is and then it just happened. And

0:18:48.280 --> 0:18:50.879
<v Speaker 14>so you know they say slowly at first, then all

0:18:50.920 --> 0:18:53.919
<v Speaker 14>at once. That's my that's my hope for the market.

0:18:55.600 --> 0:18:57.920
<v Speaker 9>Max. Hello, let's talk about Costco.

0:18:58.480 --> 0:19:01.639
<v Speaker 4>You have this arrangement with Costco to allow a Costco

0:19:01.880 --> 0:19:05.040
<v Speaker 4>costumer to pay over time. I am a Costco member

0:19:05.320 --> 0:19:08.919
<v Speaker 4>and have a City credit card, and the benefit of

0:19:08.920 --> 0:19:12.120
<v Speaker 4>the card is that it gives me five percent cash

0:19:12.160 --> 0:19:14.919
<v Speaker 4>back on gas or four percent on groceries. Right, so

0:19:14.960 --> 0:19:17.920
<v Speaker 4>I'm incentivized there. You and I've talked about this a lot, right,

0:19:17.960 --> 0:19:22.000
<v Speaker 4>the sort of academic approach to whether you should put

0:19:22.040 --> 0:19:24.960
<v Speaker 4>something or credit or not. Just explain how you think

0:19:25.000 --> 0:19:28.240
<v Speaker 4>you're going to be competitive against Costco members like I

0:19:28.320 --> 0:19:29.080
<v Speaker 4>with this offer.

0:19:30.320 --> 0:19:32.840
<v Speaker 6>You know, I'm not sure I'm going to be competitive.

0:19:32.880 --> 0:19:35.960
<v Speaker 14>I think Costco card, like everything offered a Costco, is

0:19:36.000 --> 0:19:38.840
<v Speaker 14>a great value. And you know it's certainly not a

0:19:38.920 --> 0:19:41.280
<v Speaker 14>thing we are trying to talk you out of if

0:19:41.280 --> 0:19:43.600
<v Speaker 14>you are truly committed to it. We speak to a

0:19:43.680 --> 0:19:47.159
<v Speaker 14>younger demo than a typical credit card consumer who is

0:19:47.359 --> 0:19:48.960
<v Speaker 14>very miles towards et cetera.

0:19:49.040 --> 0:19:49.520
<v Speaker 6>Conscious.

0:19:50.000 --> 0:19:54.639
<v Speaker 14>They choose to borrow with a firm because they have

0:19:54.720 --> 0:19:57.200
<v Speaker 14>a point of view on They don't like credit card debt.

0:19:57.320 --> 0:20:00.520
<v Speaker 14>They want to know exactly the true cost of the

0:20:00.560 --> 0:20:02.480
<v Speaker 14>thing they're buying. They want to know when they're out

0:20:02.480 --> 0:20:04.800
<v Speaker 14>of debt and fully paid out. And they're less interested

0:20:04.880 --> 0:20:09.400
<v Speaker 14>in rewards, much more interested in just transparency of pricing.

0:20:09.640 --> 0:20:13.040
<v Speaker 14>And I think Costco understands that as they try to

0:20:13.080 --> 0:20:15.560
<v Speaker 14>attract younger buyers, and that's why they partner with us.

0:20:17.160 --> 0:20:19.760
<v Speaker 4>I am no longer in the younger demographic.

0:20:19.880 --> 0:20:22.440
<v Speaker 6>And they're still you're still in a very young demographic.

0:20:24.000 --> 0:20:24.320
<v Speaker 9>Max.

0:20:24.359 --> 0:20:26.720
<v Speaker 4>You know the performance, you know, the top end of

0:20:26.720 --> 0:20:30.480
<v Speaker 4>the guide was above consensus. Just where were the specific

0:20:30.560 --> 0:20:33.080
<v Speaker 4>elements of strength for you? Is there anything you're doing

0:20:33.080 --> 0:20:36.640
<v Speaker 4>on the technology side that's giving you a real advantage.

0:20:37.640 --> 0:20:43.520
<v Speaker 14>No, it's very fashionable to flash your AI credentials, but

0:20:44.560 --> 0:20:48.399
<v Speaker 14>we have built a really, really meaningful business entirely on

0:20:48.480 --> 0:20:51.479
<v Speaker 14>the strength of AI and machine learning all these years

0:20:51.640 --> 0:20:56.360
<v Speaker 14>underwriting consumers with alternative data, completely different approach to modeling,

0:20:56.680 --> 0:20:59.679
<v Speaker 14>while of course remaining fully compliant with all the applicable laws.

0:21:00.119 --> 0:21:04.120
<v Speaker 14>So we are a technology first company with real depth

0:21:04.200 --> 0:21:08.159
<v Speaker 14>of approvals, while maintaining our core values to just no

0:21:08.280 --> 0:21:11.199
<v Speaker 14>laid fees, no compounding, interest, no deferred interest, all the

0:21:11.240 --> 0:21:12.960
<v Speaker 14>things that you sort of people love to complain about

0:21:13.040 --> 0:21:16.119
<v Speaker 14>when they talk about credit cards. And that's given us

0:21:16.200 --> 0:21:19.280
<v Speaker 14>real strength with the younger consumer gen Z. Just like

0:21:19.320 --> 0:21:21.760
<v Speaker 14>Bill said, you know, we have a huge penetration into

0:21:21.800 --> 0:21:23.520
<v Speaker 14>millennial demographic gen Zy demographic.

0:21:23.800 --> 0:21:25.199
<v Speaker 6>That's what retailers come to us for.

0:21:25.280 --> 0:21:27.960
<v Speaker 14>They want to attract this younger buyer who really does

0:21:28.000 --> 0:21:30.600
<v Speaker 14>differentiate between Hey, I don't want to revolve.

0:21:30.680 --> 0:21:31.440
<v Speaker 6>I don't want to.

0:21:33.000 --> 0:21:36.359
<v Speaker 14>Think of this as a buy now, pay forever, which

0:21:36.400 --> 0:21:37.959
<v Speaker 14>is you know what much much credit cards are?

0:21:38.080 --> 0:21:39.040
<v Speaker 6>Yeah?

0:21:39.440 --> 0:21:42.280
<v Speaker 3>Is that younger demographic? Is any of your demographic starting

0:21:42.320 --> 0:21:44.359
<v Speaker 3>to use you more? Because the economic uncertainty is that

0:21:44.400 --> 0:21:46.240
<v Speaker 3>what you actually anticipate going forward?

0:21:47.520 --> 0:21:48.840
<v Speaker 6>It doesn't appear to be that way.

0:21:49.080 --> 0:21:54.439
<v Speaker 14>I don't think we are gaining share because of economic uncertainty.

0:21:55.000 --> 0:21:55.560
<v Speaker 6>You know, TVD.

0:21:55.640 --> 0:21:57.879
<v Speaker 14>We're living in volatile moments, so who knows what's going

0:21:57.920 --> 0:22:00.320
<v Speaker 14>to happen next. But right now our consumer comes to

0:22:00.400 --> 0:22:03.880
<v Speaker 14>us more than anything for the clarity and the transparency.

0:22:04.240 --> 0:22:07.280
<v Speaker 6>But most importantly, I think we are.

0:22:08.720 --> 0:22:10.760
<v Speaker 14>Seeing increased growth right now because of all a zero

0:22:10.800 --> 0:22:13.200
<v Speaker 14>percent offers that we're seeing that the work we're putting

0:22:13.240 --> 0:22:13.920
<v Speaker 14>into the market right.

0:22:13.880 --> 0:22:16.760
<v Speaker 9>Now a firm CEO, Max left Chin. Great to have

0:22:16.800 --> 0:22:18.160
<v Speaker 9>you back with us. Thank you very much.

0:22:25.320 --> 0:22:27.399
<v Speaker 5>Welcome back to Blue Meg Technology. I'm Caroline Hide in

0:22:27.400 --> 0:22:28.400
<v Speaker 5>New York and.

0:22:28.359 --> 0:22:30.840
<v Speaker 4>I met Ludlow in San Francisco. Let's look at the

0:22:30.920 --> 0:22:33.960
<v Speaker 4>markets on the week and technology in particular, and as

0:22:33.960 --> 0:22:37.480
<v Speaker 4>that one hundred as it stands very modestly in decline

0:22:37.480 --> 0:22:40.720
<v Speaker 4>over the course of five days. Tariffs have been what's

0:22:40.800 --> 0:22:42.680
<v Speaker 4>driving things. I just want to look at alphabet paran

0:22:42.720 --> 0:22:48.000
<v Speaker 4>of Google right the doj antitrust remedy trial is one

0:22:48.119 --> 0:22:52.560
<v Speaker 4>factor search considerations. Rivals coming out like Apple and saying

0:22:53.000 --> 0:22:54.760
<v Speaker 4>this is what we plan to do in the search

0:22:54.880 --> 0:22:58.600
<v Speaker 4>market is really impacted their stock on Wednesday, one hundred

0:22:58.600 --> 0:23:01.879
<v Speaker 4>and forty seven billion dollars in market shed alone on aggregate,

0:23:01.920 --> 0:23:04.159
<v Speaker 4>heading to about one hundred and twenty billion dollars a

0:23:04.160 --> 0:23:06.960
<v Speaker 4>market cap decline. Later in the program, we'll get into it,

0:23:07.160 --> 0:23:09.720
<v Speaker 4>and in terms of specific movers, we're going to go

0:23:09.760 --> 0:23:12.879
<v Speaker 4>to the earnings context very shortly. But think about the

0:23:12.920 --> 0:23:16.800
<v Speaker 4>strength that we're seeing in streaming Cara in particular, and

0:23:16.840 --> 0:23:18.760
<v Speaker 4>then not just here in America, but we've got some

0:23:18.840 --> 0:23:20.240
<v Speaker 4>interesting us from around the world.

0:23:20.480 --> 0:23:22.199
<v Speaker 5>We did, and it's your world of gaming end.

0:23:22.280 --> 0:23:25.600
<v Speaker 3>Because let's turn our attention to Nintendo projecting actually weaker

0:23:25.600 --> 0:23:29.679
<v Speaker 3>than expected initial sales for the Switch too, despite overwhelming

0:23:29.760 --> 0:23:32.159
<v Speaker 3>pre orders and market expectations that it would be the

0:23:32.240 --> 0:23:33.840
<v Speaker 3>fastest selling console in history.

0:23:34.280 --> 0:23:36.919
<v Speaker 5>Jason Schards joining us on what is this? You know?

0:23:36.960 --> 0:23:38.040
<v Speaker 5>Off by three percent?

0:23:38.440 --> 0:23:41.320
<v Speaker 3>They've got trade and tariff's to be thinking about. But Jason,

0:23:41.440 --> 0:23:43.399
<v Speaker 3>why the slower than anticipated sales?

0:23:44.280 --> 0:23:45.480
<v Speaker 9>Tariffs are the big one.

0:23:45.720 --> 0:23:47.160
<v Speaker 8>Nobody knows what's going to happen.

0:23:47.280 --> 0:23:51.040
<v Speaker 15>Nintendo included, they make the majority of switch tos that

0:23:51.080 --> 0:23:54.400
<v Speaker 15>are sold in the US. They make in Vietnam, which

0:23:54.480 --> 0:23:57.320
<v Speaker 15>is one of those tariffs that is still unpaused for

0:23:57.480 --> 0:24:00.560
<v Speaker 15>ninety days according to President Trump. So I guess we'll

0:24:00.600 --> 0:24:04.800
<v Speaker 15>see what happens there. The other factor is supply shortage.

0:24:05.160 --> 0:24:08.280
<v Speaker 15>That's always a question surrounding the release of these new consoles.

0:24:08.320 --> 0:24:12.280
<v Speaker 15>How many can they actually manufacture and get to US shores,

0:24:12.280 --> 0:24:13.320
<v Speaker 15>whether or without tariffs.

0:24:14.280 --> 0:24:16.960
<v Speaker 4>There's definitely a technology conversation had with the Switch to

0:24:17.160 --> 0:24:19.960
<v Speaker 4>right inside of it is a high performance and video

0:24:20.000 --> 0:24:23.080
<v Speaker 4>processor that takes the Switch to from being a kind

0:24:23.080 --> 0:24:27.760
<v Speaker 4>of lower fidelity, lower performance console to being more on

0:24:27.880 --> 0:24:31.679
<v Speaker 4>par with PlayStation and Xbox. You know what is going

0:24:31.760 --> 0:24:34.359
<v Speaker 4>to be different this time around for the Switch, Like culturally,

0:24:34.640 --> 0:24:36.880
<v Speaker 4>how do you think people will approach what it can

0:24:36.920 --> 0:24:40.120
<v Speaker 4>do and the types of games you can play on it.

0:24:40.119 --> 0:24:42.720
<v Speaker 15>It's interesting this issue comes out of a really fascinating

0:24:42.760 --> 0:24:46.280
<v Speaker 15>time for the video game industry in that graphical Fideli

0:24:46.359 --> 0:24:49.320
<v Speaker 15>has not really gotten that much more impressive over the

0:24:49.359 --> 0:24:52.400
<v Speaker 15>last four or five years. So Nintendo is pretty well

0:24:52.400 --> 0:24:56.320
<v Speaker 15>positioned even with technology that is a few years old

0:24:56.320 --> 0:24:59.120
<v Speaker 15>at this point, even technology that is five six years old,

0:24:59.760 --> 0:25:02.720
<v Speaker 15>it is in a good position to still sell games

0:25:02.800 --> 0:25:05.280
<v Speaker 15>and compete with the other two consoles. I mean, the

0:25:05.280 --> 0:25:07.720
<v Speaker 15>other big factor is that people buy Nintendo consoles for

0:25:07.840 --> 0:25:12.400
<v Speaker 15>Nintendo games. They want Mario, they want Zelda. Mario Kart World,

0:25:12.440 --> 0:25:14.879
<v Speaker 15>which is launching alongside the Switch too, is expected to

0:25:14.920 --> 0:25:17.440
<v Speaker 15>sell a kajillion copies of the last one sold over

0:25:17.560 --> 0:25:22.280
<v Speaker 15>seventy million units alone. So we're talking about a customer

0:25:22.320 --> 0:25:25.280
<v Speaker 15>base that is built in and doesn't care quite as

0:25:25.359 --> 0:25:29.480
<v Speaker 15>much about graphics, about the highest end GTA level games

0:25:29.640 --> 0:25:32.239
<v Speaker 15>as much as they do about these franchises that are

0:25:32.400 --> 0:25:35.880
<v Speaker 15>really always consistently good bluebags.

0:25:35.960 --> 0:25:38.560
<v Speaker 4>Jason Schreyer, who leads our video games industry coverage.

0:25:38.560 --> 0:25:40.240
<v Speaker 9>Great to have you on the show. Thank you very much.

0:25:40.480 --> 0:25:43.520
<v Speaker 4>Let's stick with earning shares of Trade Desk for flirting

0:25:43.560 --> 0:25:46.080
<v Speaker 4>with the best day in more than two years, getting

0:25:46.080 --> 0:25:48.680
<v Speaker 4>a boost from better than expected q ON results and

0:25:48.840 --> 0:25:53.440
<v Speaker 4>upbeat forecasts. The best performer on the Nasdaq one hundred

0:25:53.600 --> 0:25:58.840
<v Speaker 4>in terms of percentage gain. Laura Martin, Media, Senior Entertainment Analyst,

0:25:58.880 --> 0:26:02.720
<v Speaker 4>joint US. Now, now let me do this. What is

0:26:02.840 --> 0:26:03.600
<v Speaker 4>trade desk?

0:26:04.119 --> 0:26:06.760
<v Speaker 9>What does it do and does it do it well?

0:26:08.760 --> 0:26:09.960
<v Speaker 16>What an excellent question.

0:26:10.320 --> 0:26:13.520
<v Speaker 17>Okay, So Trade Desk is a demand side platform, a DSP,

0:26:14.119 --> 0:26:16.320
<v Speaker 17>and so when you load a web page of a

0:26:16.359 --> 0:26:20.000
<v Speaker 17>news article you're watching, Trade Desk delivers an AD in

0:26:20.040 --> 0:26:23.560
<v Speaker 17>real time in milliseconds, and that ad has actually gone

0:26:23.640 --> 0:26:27.600
<v Speaker 17>to auction in those milliseconds because they know who you are,

0:26:27.640 --> 0:26:29.560
<v Speaker 17>and they know how much money you make, and they

0:26:29.600 --> 0:26:32.400
<v Speaker 17>know that you're in the financial industry. So your AD

0:26:32.520 --> 0:26:36.320
<v Speaker 17>units that are getting served to you in milliseconds are

0:26:36.520 --> 0:26:39.560
<v Speaker 17>very valuable, much more valuable than like, you know, my kids,

0:26:39.600 --> 0:26:42.160
<v Speaker 17>who earns no money and lives at home. So Trade

0:26:42.160 --> 0:26:45.080
<v Speaker 17>Desk delivers those in milliseconds, having bought them at auction

0:26:45.200 --> 0:26:49.560
<v Speaker 17>and they represent the largest two hundred advertisers. I think

0:26:49.600 --> 0:26:52.480
<v Speaker 17>technically they have, you know, four thousand ad buyers, but

0:26:52.520 --> 0:26:56.399
<v Speaker 17>they only represent ad buyers typically top of funnel without

0:26:56.400 --> 0:26:58.520
<v Speaker 17>a performance metric associated with it.

0:26:59.119 --> 0:27:01.720
<v Speaker 3>They're doing strategy, got grades Kokai, they say, is giving

0:27:01.760 --> 0:27:04.359
<v Speaker 3>them more power than ever. It's interesting, Lad, They're obviously

0:27:04.400 --> 0:27:06.600
<v Speaker 3>delivering on a technology front, but there's got to be

0:27:06.640 --> 0:27:09.960
<v Speaker 3>a resilient desire to be advertising this moment. We've seen

0:27:09.960 --> 0:27:12.359
<v Speaker 3>that from Meta, We've just seen it from Pinterest as well.

0:27:12.640 --> 0:27:16.320
<v Speaker 3>From your perspective, is the advertisers, the marketerstre willing to

0:27:16.359 --> 0:27:17.360
<v Speaker 3>spend in this environment.

0:27:18.840 --> 0:27:23.160
<v Speaker 17>So every company has now reported earnings on every call

0:27:23.200 --> 0:27:27.360
<v Speaker 17>they've gotten. Asked since April second, terraffs, have you seen downdraft?

0:27:27.800 --> 0:27:30.159
<v Speaker 17>And with a couple exceptions, everybody else has said no.

0:27:30.280 --> 0:27:32.960
<v Speaker 17>Trade desk said no. To date, it's been five weeks

0:27:32.960 --> 0:27:36.040
<v Speaker 17>since April second, they have not seen downdraft other than

0:27:36.480 --> 0:27:40.720
<v Speaker 17>in areas like autos or home appliances is down like

0:27:40.760 --> 0:27:45.720
<v Speaker 17>forty percent with one company I talked to since April second,

0:27:46.080 --> 0:27:48.560
<v Speaker 17>and you guys probably saw like the ports are empty.

0:27:48.560 --> 0:27:51.680
<v Speaker 17>They've turned around these container ship carriers and they're going

0:27:51.680 --> 0:27:54.520
<v Speaker 17>back home rather than try to empty in the ports

0:27:54.520 --> 0:27:56.639
<v Speaker 17>and pay the tariffs. So I think this might be

0:27:56.720 --> 0:28:00.239
<v Speaker 17>a gathering storm. But so far Trade Desk has not

0:28:00.320 --> 0:28:01.360
<v Speaker 17>seen impact.

0:28:01.040 --> 0:28:03.159
<v Speaker 9>Of Terras Laura.

0:28:03.240 --> 0:28:05.600
<v Speaker 4>This week in Europe we had the semi final of

0:28:05.640 --> 0:28:09.640
<v Speaker 4>the Champions League, which makes me think about Paramount. You know,

0:28:09.800 --> 0:28:13.000
<v Speaker 4>just as a case study, they showed some streaming strength,

0:28:13.480 --> 0:28:16.400
<v Speaker 4>but on aggregate, what have you learned about the streaming

0:28:16.600 --> 0:28:20.359
<v Speaker 4>landscape this far and particularly consumer attitudes to all of

0:28:20.359 --> 0:28:21.760
<v Speaker 4>the platforms available to them?

0:28:22.640 --> 0:28:26.600
<v Speaker 17>Right, so we can talk about dizz Disney, Warner Brothers,

0:28:26.680 --> 0:28:29.800
<v Speaker 17>Discovery and Paramount like all together big streamers, which is

0:28:29.800 --> 0:28:32.879
<v Speaker 17>the source of question. But from a stock point of view, first,

0:28:32.960 --> 0:28:37.560
<v Speaker 17>I just want to make a distinction because Paramount revenue

0:28:37.640 --> 0:28:42.320
<v Speaker 17>felt ten percent, Warner Brothers fell six percent, and both

0:28:42.360 --> 0:28:45.320
<v Speaker 17>of them were projecting negative four percent revenue growth this

0:28:45.400 --> 0:28:48.560
<v Speaker 17>year and flat next year, which begs the question why

0:28:48.600 --> 0:28:50.080
<v Speaker 17>do you need to be in these now because they're

0:28:50.080 --> 0:28:54.640
<v Speaker 17>still not growing. Disney, by contrast, revenue up seven percent.

0:28:54.920 --> 0:28:57.880
<v Speaker 17>We're showing revenue up four percent this year and four

0:28:57.920 --> 0:29:01.080
<v Speaker 17>percent next year. A lot of that is driven by streaming,

0:29:01.160 --> 0:29:03.000
<v Speaker 17>so that's where I get to the answer to your question.

0:29:03.400 --> 0:29:05.800
<v Speaker 17>A lot of that is driven by you know, not

0:29:05.840 --> 0:29:09.200
<v Speaker 17>only does Disney have better have more diversity of assets,

0:29:09.240 --> 0:29:12.080
<v Speaker 17>of course, but it also has better films, which helps.

0:29:12.120 --> 0:29:14.280
<v Speaker 17>Although films less than fifteen percent of the business at

0:29:14.280 --> 0:29:17.840
<v Speaker 17>Walt Disney these days, but streaming is what's really driving

0:29:17.840 --> 0:29:22.440
<v Speaker 17>that outperformance compared to Paramount, compared to Warner Brothers, Paramount

0:29:22.440 --> 0:29:24.680
<v Speaker 17>has the overhang of can it's deal get done? That's

0:29:24.680 --> 0:29:27.720
<v Speaker 17>a big that's a big like cloud on Paramount. But

0:29:27.840 --> 0:29:31.600
<v Speaker 17>the fundamentals of streaming are a bright spot. But if

0:29:31.640 --> 0:29:34.840
<v Speaker 17>you can't make good films or you can't sell good TV,

0:29:35.360 --> 0:29:38.480
<v Speaker 17>it's you have a big linear TV business, which both

0:29:38.480 --> 0:29:40.600
<v Speaker 17>Paramount does and Warner Brothers Discovery does.

0:29:41.480 --> 0:29:44.560
<v Speaker 16>Like it's a problem, right because it's a shrinking to guests.

0:29:44.600 --> 0:29:47.480
<v Speaker 3>I mean, also, what's the problem is if you're suddenly

0:29:47.480 --> 0:29:52.760
<v Speaker 3>going to have massive costs on your movies going well anywhere,

0:29:52.760 --> 0:29:55.400
<v Speaker 3>being able to make content abroad, being able to bring

0:29:55.480 --> 0:29:59.200
<v Speaker 3>foreign made produced content into the United States that has

0:29:59.240 --> 0:30:02.120
<v Speaker 3>been proposed by the administration seems to be hurting the

0:30:02.240 --> 0:30:04.520
<v Speaker 3>very industry that they're trying to protect. Right now, what

0:30:04.680 --> 0:30:06.640
<v Speaker 3>is the impact on paramount. What is the impact on

0:30:06.680 --> 0:30:08.160
<v Speaker 3>Disney if this does go into full.

0:30:08.000 --> 0:30:12.040
<v Speaker 17>Force, right, No, it's an excellent point because he is

0:30:12.120 --> 0:30:14.160
<v Speaker 17>trying to help the industry. But as you know, films

0:30:14.200 --> 0:30:17.200
<v Speaker 17>take three years to make, so the tariffs immediately would

0:30:17.280 --> 0:30:19.640
<v Speaker 17>hurt a film that started three years ago before this

0:30:19.760 --> 0:30:23.840
<v Speaker 17>policy existed, before the companies could react. So every film

0:30:23.880 --> 0:30:26.320
<v Speaker 17>trying to come back to America that's been made offshore,

0:30:26.520 --> 0:30:28.000
<v Speaker 17>whether it's tax advantage or not.

0:30:28.040 --> 0:30:29.320
<v Speaker 16>You watch Mission Impossible.

0:30:29.520 --> 0:30:31.920
<v Speaker 17>They are going for the tax breaks, right, They're going

0:30:31.960 --> 0:30:35.560
<v Speaker 17>for these really exotic locations, and they don't like money.

0:30:35.600 --> 0:30:37.320
<v Speaker 16>Isn't the reason they're off shore. They're off sure for

0:30:37.360 --> 0:30:39.160
<v Speaker 16>the art of it, like for where, like.

0:30:39.160 --> 0:30:41.840
<v Speaker 17>The plot line. So now those films are coming back

0:30:41.840 --> 0:30:44.400
<v Speaker 17>over the next two years, and they're all going to

0:30:44.440 --> 0:30:46.320
<v Speaker 17>be taxed at one hundred percent Like that is not

0:30:46.440 --> 0:30:47.640
<v Speaker 17>helpful for the industry.

0:30:49.720 --> 0:30:52.600
<v Speaker 4>I mentioned it at the top of the block about

0:30:52.640 --> 0:30:57.040
<v Speaker 4>alphabet and Google. Right, it's been an astonishing week frankly

0:30:57.120 --> 0:30:59.480
<v Speaker 4>about revelation in the antitrust context.

0:31:00.000 --> 0:31:02.520
<v Speaker 9>You focus on YouTube historically.

0:31:02.160 --> 0:31:04.600
<v Speaker 4>When we talk about the streamers, but just in that

0:31:04.800 --> 0:31:09.840
<v Speaker 4>antitrust context, have you sort of recalculated remodeled. The future

0:31:09.920 --> 0:31:13.320
<v Speaker 4>you see for Alphabet and its various properties largely search.

0:31:14.280 --> 0:31:15.480
<v Speaker 16>Yeah, like our policies.

0:31:15.520 --> 0:31:18.320
<v Speaker 17>You know, we do evaluation of YouTube as a standalone

0:31:18.480 --> 0:31:21.200
<v Speaker 17>entity every single quarter this company.

0:31:21.280 --> 0:31:23.240
<v Speaker 16>My opinion is Google is worth more.

0:31:23.160 --> 0:31:25.400
<v Speaker 17>On Alphabet is worth more in pieces than it is

0:31:25.440 --> 0:31:29.520
<v Speaker 17>together because it's my opinion that people within the Alphabet

0:31:29.560 --> 0:31:34.400
<v Speaker 17>holding company framework get subsidized by search, so they are

0:31:34.440 --> 0:31:36.600
<v Speaker 17>not required to make money as if they're a general

0:31:36.640 --> 0:31:39.200
<v Speaker 17>manager of their P and L. I think the best

0:31:39.200 --> 0:31:41.400
<v Speaker 17>thing that could happen for ad Tech is for them

0:31:41.440 --> 0:31:43.800
<v Speaker 17>to be forced at the September hearing to spin off

0:31:44.080 --> 0:31:47.720
<v Speaker 17>the ad server and the SSP their supply side, which

0:31:47.760 --> 0:31:50.520
<v Speaker 17>is the marriage piece to prade desperate cert. If they

0:31:50.600 --> 0:31:52.640
<v Speaker 17>got that would be really great for ATIK. It would

0:31:52.680 --> 0:31:56.200
<v Speaker 17>also be good for not the Google perimeter that stayed behind,

0:31:56.600 --> 0:31:59.640
<v Speaker 17>but the Google asset. The managers that happen to have

0:31:59.760 --> 0:32:02.400
<v Speaker 17>to to compete for the first time and not get

0:32:02.400 --> 0:32:06.280
<v Speaker 17>the benefit of being tied to search data and YouTube data,

0:32:06.320 --> 0:32:09.320
<v Speaker 17>which is best in class like consumer data. So and

0:32:09.400 --> 0:32:12.760
<v Speaker 17>I think the more Alphabet gets smaller, the more they

0:32:12.760 --> 0:32:15.880
<v Speaker 17>can focus on what matters, which is solving the search problem.

0:32:15.880 --> 0:32:18.800
<v Speaker 17>Now that AI is here and making sure YouTube remains

0:32:18.840 --> 0:32:20.480
<v Speaker 17>the number one streamer on Earth.

0:32:21.280 --> 0:32:23.240
<v Speaker 3>Laura Martin, It's always great to catch up with you.

0:32:23.560 --> 0:32:24.760
<v Speaker 3>Happy weekend speech.

0:32:24.760 --> 0:32:26.880
<v Speaker 5>You see. We hope of Needham appreciate it.

0:32:26.920 --> 0:32:30.360
<v Speaker 3>Meanwhile, coming up, more earnings, more CEOs, Draftking CEO Jason

0:32:30.400 --> 0:32:35.040
<v Speaker 3>Robbins joins us discuss the company and will slightly cut

0:32:35.400 --> 0:32:40.400
<v Speaker 3>to its guide as a Bluebote technology.

0:32:47.280 --> 0:32:51.320
<v Speaker 4>Draftking shares rising, with investors shrugging off the company's reduced

0:32:51.440 --> 0:32:56.480
<v Speaker 4>full year guidance after a customer friendly March Madness weight

0:32:56.600 --> 0:33:00.680
<v Speaker 4>on sales. Draftking CEO Jason Robbins delighted, say joins us.

0:33:01.240 --> 0:33:04.360
<v Speaker 4>There has been some, let's say, back of the Napkin

0:33:05.040 --> 0:33:09.200
<v Speaker 4>math and people look at the revenue forecast being lowered

0:33:09.200 --> 0:33:12.200
<v Speaker 4>by about two hundred million dollars. Right, Bear with me, Jason,

0:33:12.880 --> 0:33:17.160
<v Speaker 4>Is that exactly how much Draft Kings lost on March Madness,

0:33:17.320 --> 0:33:17.800
<v Speaker 4>the two.

0:33:17.640 --> 0:33:18.720
<v Speaker 9>Hundred million dollar figure.

0:33:20.280 --> 0:33:22.400
<v Speaker 18>No, we actually put out the numbers.

0:33:22.440 --> 0:33:24.560
<v Speaker 19>We have a bridge in our earnings materials.

0:33:24.560 --> 0:33:27.440
<v Speaker 18>It was a little bit less, but overall it's not

0:33:27.560 --> 0:33:28.320
<v Speaker 18>too far off.

0:33:29.440 --> 0:33:31.680
<v Speaker 3>Okay, talk to us a little bit about what's too

0:33:31.760 --> 0:33:35.000
<v Speaker 3>far off as well? What else is driving perhaps an

0:33:35.040 --> 0:33:38.200
<v Speaker 3>expected downgrade in full year guidance. Analysts seem to be

0:33:38.280 --> 0:33:40.600
<v Speaker 3>taking as well on the chin as our investors, but

0:33:40.680 --> 0:33:42.240
<v Speaker 3>the regulatory environment as well.

0:33:42.280 --> 0:33:43.640
<v Speaker 5>How much you haven't in you once for that?

0:33:45.400 --> 0:33:47.800
<v Speaker 18>Well, what we we put this out there. We had

0:33:47.840 --> 0:33:50.880
<v Speaker 18>about one hundred and seventy million from sport outcomes and

0:33:50.920 --> 0:33:57.240
<v Speaker 18>then thirty million came from jack Pocket being caused to

0:33:57.280 --> 0:33:59.640
<v Speaker 18>not be operating anymore in Texas. But then the overall

0:33:59.640 --> 0:34:02.680
<v Speaker 18>fundamentals of the business were actually very strong. We saw

0:34:02.800 --> 0:34:07.080
<v Speaker 18>increased to structural hold rate, our promotional efficiency increase, so

0:34:07.360 --> 0:34:10.440
<v Speaker 18>some of those things offset as well. So really the

0:34:10.440 --> 0:34:13.160
<v Speaker 18>fundamentals of the business are about as healthy as can be.

0:34:13.320 --> 0:34:15.680
<v Speaker 18>And I think the real question is will all these

0:34:15.680 --> 0:34:18.759
<v Speaker 18>sport outcomes turn around in two quarters in a row now?

0:34:18.840 --> 0:34:21.800
<v Speaker 18>But obviously that happens, and that's part of the greatness

0:34:21.880 --> 0:34:24.000
<v Speaker 18>of the product is that customers can win and they

0:34:24.040 --> 0:34:25.879
<v Speaker 18>can go on winning streaks like this, and it makes

0:34:25.880 --> 0:34:28.000
<v Speaker 18>it a lot of fun obviously, and you know, we'll

0:34:28.000 --> 0:34:30.520
<v Speaker 18>see it was the first time and I think second

0:34:30.560 --> 0:34:32.560
<v Speaker 18>time ever there were all four number one seeds in

0:34:32.600 --> 0:34:34.759
<v Speaker 18>the final four. Only the first time ever that that

0:34:34.840 --> 0:34:37.800
<v Speaker 18>happened with also all twos in one three seed in

0:34:37.840 --> 0:34:41.399
<v Speaker 18>the Elite eight, So you never know, maybe there will

0:34:41.440 --> 0:34:43.239
<v Speaker 18>be another year like that, but probably not.

0:34:43.360 --> 0:34:44.759
<v Speaker 19>It was more likely an anomaly.

0:34:44.840 --> 0:34:47.600
<v Speaker 18>And you know NBA playoffs already have had a bunch

0:34:47.600 --> 0:34:49.600
<v Speaker 18>of upsets, so it tends to kind of swing.

0:34:49.400 --> 0:34:50.680
<v Speaker 19>Around the other way over time.

0:34:50.800 --> 0:34:52.520
<v Speaker 5>Ah, too much consistency.

0:34:52.840 --> 0:34:56.400
<v Speaker 3>But what also is consistent, Jason, is what a massive

0:34:56.520 --> 0:34:58.399
<v Speaker 3>jump in your monthly active uses when you talk about

0:34:58.400 --> 0:35:02.279
<v Speaker 3>the Jackpot in particular, and I'm interested in how jackpocket

0:35:02.320 --> 0:35:06.560
<v Speaker 3>is transferring to other sports, casino games and the likes

0:35:06.640 --> 0:35:08.960
<v Speaker 3>or are people sticking to that lottery application.

0:35:10.719 --> 0:35:14.720
<v Speaker 18>Well, the jackpocket is still very early in its growth,

0:35:14.760 --> 0:35:17.319
<v Speaker 18>it's still quite nascent, so we believe there's a ton

0:35:17.320 --> 0:35:19.560
<v Speaker 18>of upside for that business and we're excited about it.

0:35:19.880 --> 0:35:23.080
<v Speaker 18>We haven't fully integrated it into the DraftKings app yet,

0:35:23.120 --> 0:35:25.399
<v Speaker 18>we haven't put it on our platform yet, which should

0:35:25.480 --> 0:35:29.040
<v Speaker 18>dramatically increase both the conversion metrics and also the cross

0:35:29.040 --> 0:35:31.799
<v Speaker 18>sellability and marketing ability. And the cross sells already well

0:35:31.840 --> 0:35:34.840
<v Speaker 18>above our expectations, so we think there's even more upside there,

0:35:35.480 --> 0:35:37.040
<v Speaker 18>so we're pretty excited about it. We think there's a

0:35:37.080 --> 0:35:39.120
<v Speaker 18>lot of growth potential, but it's still small, so the

0:35:39.160 --> 0:35:42.840
<v Speaker 18>overall impact on the business isn't great yet, but hopefully

0:35:42.880 --> 0:35:45.319
<v Speaker 18>that changes as Jackpocket continues to grow.

0:35:46.480 --> 0:35:50.239
<v Speaker 4>Jason, in your industry, there are big almost legacy names

0:35:50.320 --> 0:35:53.000
<v Speaker 4>Las Vegas Sands, for example, that are pulling out of

0:35:53.120 --> 0:35:57.439
<v Speaker 4>bids for land based casinos, and I wonder how much

0:35:57.480 --> 0:36:03.360
<v Speaker 4>you can assess their nervousness that online gambling just cannibalizes

0:36:03.400 --> 0:36:06.400
<v Speaker 4>demand for land base and how that impacts you.

0:36:08.239 --> 0:36:10.680
<v Speaker 18>Well, it's certainly a perception that we have to fight

0:36:10.800 --> 0:36:13.520
<v Speaker 18>because it's out there. I do think that the facts

0:36:13.560 --> 0:36:16.239
<v Speaker 18>are very mixed on that. While there's certainly some examples

0:36:16.280 --> 0:36:19.040
<v Speaker 18>you can point to where there's been you know, diminishing

0:36:19.080 --> 0:36:21.880
<v Speaker 18>markets where they've had online gaming, it's also you know

0:36:21.960 --> 0:36:24.440
<v Speaker 18>often where there have been declines going into that, and

0:36:24.480 --> 0:36:26.960
<v Speaker 18>then you see the complete opposite story in states like

0:36:27.000 --> 0:36:30.239
<v Speaker 18>New Jersey where they grew and really reversed a declining

0:36:30.239 --> 0:36:34.200
<v Speaker 18>trend for years after legalizing online gaming. And it's also

0:36:34.239 --> 0:36:37.439
<v Speaker 18>a different property to property. I do understand though, why

0:36:37.520 --> 0:36:40.319
<v Speaker 18>if you're a company that has no ie gaming play

0:36:40.400 --> 0:36:42.919
<v Speaker 18>right now, doesn't have an app, doesn't have a way

0:36:42.920 --> 0:36:45.000
<v Speaker 18>to make money off of it, that this wouldn't be

0:36:45.040 --> 0:36:47.960
<v Speaker 18>seen as any upside for you, and so naturally, you know,

0:36:47.960 --> 0:36:50.880
<v Speaker 18>if there's no upside there, there can only be downside.

0:36:50.880 --> 0:36:52.359
<v Speaker 19>And I do understand that.

0:36:52.719 --> 0:36:55.800
<v Speaker 18>But I think the amount of cannibalization and the downside

0:36:55.800 --> 0:36:57.920
<v Speaker 18>has been greatly exaggerated and we need to do a

0:36:57.960 --> 0:36:59.919
<v Speaker 18>good job, or a better job, I should say, educate

0:37:00.239 --> 0:37:03.480
<v Speaker 18>on that, because the numbers don't necessarily support that story.

0:37:04.480 --> 0:37:07.839
<v Speaker 3>Jason Robbins, Draftking CEO, thanks so much for joining us today.

0:37:07.880 --> 0:37:10.239
<v Speaker 5>I appreciate it. Thank you foring wow, we're going.

0:37:10.160 --> 0:37:12.279
<v Speaker 3>To look with Sticking with sports, we also just caught

0:37:12.360 --> 0:37:15.279
<v Speaker 3>up with David Beckham's former teammate Gary Neville. After the

0:37:15.320 --> 0:37:18.760
<v Speaker 3>two partner up, they recommitted to buying Saltford City Football

0:37:18.760 --> 0:37:21.680
<v Speaker 3>Club alongside global advisor and investment platform can Seller Group

0:37:21.840 --> 0:37:24.400
<v Speaker 3>and a whole host of other business executives. Now, Neville

0:37:24.400 --> 0:37:27.399
<v Speaker 3>spoke about the importance of content as well as pitch

0:37:27.440 --> 0:37:29.680
<v Speaker 3>performance to take it all the way to the Championship

0:37:29.719 --> 0:37:30.640
<v Speaker 3>League in the next five years.

0:37:30.680 --> 0:37:32.279
<v Speaker 5>Take a listen you.

0:37:32.280 --> 0:37:34.600
<v Speaker 20>Refer to Obviously Wrexham THEYD done a great job there

0:37:34.680 --> 0:37:36.680
<v Speaker 20>over the last few years. But we've been in Salford

0:37:36.719 --> 0:37:39.319
<v Speaker 20>now for ten years. We had a documentary nine years ago,

0:37:39.360 --> 0:37:41.400
<v Speaker 20>I think the very first fly on the Wall documentary

0:37:41.440 --> 0:37:43.680
<v Speaker 20>of a football club that was on the BBC and

0:37:43.800 --> 0:37:46.520
<v Speaker 20>used to get millions of people watching it. We definitely

0:37:46.560 --> 0:37:49.840
<v Speaker 20>want to revisit that type of model and grow commercial revenues,

0:37:50.040 --> 0:37:52.120
<v Speaker 20>but doing it in such a way whereby football is

0:37:52.160 --> 0:37:55.440
<v Speaker 20>always deemed as a priority, and you know, there is

0:37:55.520 --> 0:37:58.120
<v Speaker 20>great excitement on the ground here. It's a new injection

0:37:58.160 --> 0:37:59.640
<v Speaker 20>of life into Salford City.

0:38:02.080 --> 0:38:12.680
<v Speaker 5>On Bloomberg dot com ed, the.

0:38:12.600 --> 0:38:16.160
<v Speaker 4>Federal Trade Commission has spent the past month presenting evidence

0:38:16.239 --> 0:38:20.080
<v Speaker 4>to show the social media giant Meta should be broken up,

0:38:20.120 --> 0:38:22.440
<v Speaker 4>and testimony from more big names.

0:38:22.200 --> 0:38:23.560
<v Speaker 9>Is expected in the coming weeks.

0:38:23.719 --> 0:38:26.320
<v Speaker 4>Bloombo's Riley Griffin is out on the East Coast in

0:38:26.480 --> 0:38:28.000
<v Speaker 4>DC tracking what's going on.

0:38:28.640 --> 0:38:29.640
<v Speaker 9>What is the latest?

0:38:29.840 --> 0:38:32.000
<v Speaker 4>You know, there are so many headlines that come out

0:38:32.040 --> 0:38:35.520
<v Speaker 4>over the course of the process based on people's testimony.

0:38:35.760 --> 0:38:38.480
<v Speaker 4>It's hard to say where, like net we stand right now.

0:38:39.760 --> 0:38:42.360
<v Speaker 21>Well, we are at the midpoint of the trial. We

0:38:42.480 --> 0:38:46.040
<v Speaker 21>expect potentially next week or the week thereafter, Meta to

0:38:46.160 --> 0:38:49.680
<v Speaker 21>begin in earnest its defense. But what we saw just

0:38:49.880 --> 0:38:55.680
<v Speaker 21>yesterday was Instagram chief Adam musserri defending Meta against the FTC,

0:38:55.800 --> 0:38:58.680
<v Speaker 21>which is making the claim that Meta has dominated the

0:38:58.800 --> 0:39:02.600
<v Speaker 21>friends and family market that means social media that is

0:39:02.640 --> 0:39:05.879
<v Speaker 21>focused on connecting with your friends. It's a tough case

0:39:05.880 --> 0:39:10.120
<v Speaker 21>ahead because, as Adam Asseri said, TikTok has emerged as

0:39:10.160 --> 0:39:13.319
<v Speaker 21>a primary competitor and they are more focused on entertainment.

0:39:14.160 --> 0:39:18.120
<v Speaker 3>Ronnie, there's evidence that was shown at this trial that

0:39:18.160 --> 0:39:20.720
<v Speaker 3>you're not always being recommended to connect with your friends

0:39:20.760 --> 0:39:24.399
<v Speaker 3>or your family, and groomers have been presented as being

0:39:24.520 --> 0:39:28.440
<v Speaker 3>actually shown and recommended children to connect with. This is

0:39:28.480 --> 0:39:31.399
<v Speaker 3>an a document that Meta itself had done an investigation.

0:39:30.840 --> 0:39:33.480
<v Speaker 5>With Yes in twenty nineteen.

0:39:34.000 --> 0:39:38.359
<v Speaker 21>Meta internal documents identified groomers, a term that they were

0:39:38.440 --> 0:39:42.799
<v Speaker 21>using to define child predators were being served miners as

0:39:43.000 --> 0:39:47.960
<v Speaker 21>suggested follows on Instagram. They found that seven percent twenty

0:39:48.160 --> 0:39:52.640
<v Speaker 21>seven percent of the follow suggestions made to this cohort

0:39:52.680 --> 0:39:55.560
<v Speaker 21>of potential child predators were foreign miners.

0:39:55.920 --> 0:39:58.440
<v Speaker 5>And this came up from the.

0:39:58.360 --> 0:40:01.520
<v Speaker 21>FTC, which was trying to and straight that Meta's acquisition

0:40:01.560 --> 0:40:04.360
<v Speaker 21>of Instagram had actually degraded the quality of the app.

0:40:04.800 --> 0:40:06.879
<v Speaker 3>Now, it must be said that twenty nineteen is several

0:40:06.920 --> 0:40:08.719
<v Speaker 3>years ago, and now in twenty twenty five. They have

0:40:08.800 --> 0:40:11.120
<v Speaker 3>made a lot of steps in terms of child protection

0:40:11.320 --> 0:40:13.640
<v Speaker 3>and teen safety, but fully into it for you to

0:40:13.640 --> 0:40:15.960
<v Speaker 3>bring us that story, Riley Griffin, thank you and.

0:40:16.040 --> 0:40:16.759
<v Speaker 5>All things meta.

0:40:16.840 --> 0:40:18.799
<v Speaker 3>But let's turn to the case that's been gripping the

0:40:18.800 --> 0:40:20.600
<v Speaker 3>tech world too. And it's the final day of the

0:40:20.719 --> 0:40:24.440
<v Speaker 3>arguments in a trial to determine how or if to

0:40:24.480 --> 0:40:28.200
<v Speaker 3>break up Google search monopoly. Jos Cisco joins us now

0:40:28.600 --> 0:40:31.279
<v Speaker 3>and just wrap it up for us in terms of

0:40:31.320 --> 0:40:34.920
<v Speaker 3>where you think the balance lies now. Have they managed

0:40:34.960 --> 0:40:37.600
<v Speaker 3>to show to the court that search is being so

0:40:37.719 --> 0:40:40.080
<v Speaker 3>disrupted at this moment that perhaps they don't need to

0:40:40.280 --> 0:40:43.120
<v Speaker 3>unwind some of their payments that they put to Apple

0:40:43.160 --> 0:40:43.760
<v Speaker 3>for example.

0:40:45.160 --> 0:40:49.520
<v Speaker 22>I think the judge is fairly skeptical of Google's argument

0:40:49.640 --> 0:40:52.640
<v Speaker 22>so far. Whether he wants to go so far as

0:40:52.680 --> 0:40:55.200
<v Speaker 22>to break up the company and force them to sell

0:40:55.280 --> 0:40:59.279
<v Speaker 22>off off Chrome, I think that's sort of up in

0:40:59.320 --> 0:41:03.000
<v Speaker 22>the air. But this idea of cutting off the money flow,

0:41:03.160 --> 0:41:06.160
<v Speaker 22>I mean, he found in his ruling last year that

0:41:06.239 --> 0:41:09.960
<v Speaker 22>the payments were anti competitive, so it's hard to imagine

0:41:10.000 --> 0:41:13.239
<v Speaker 22>that he wouldn't want to stop sort of cut off

0:41:13.239 --> 0:41:16.600
<v Speaker 22>that money flow. At the very minimum.

0:41:16.800 --> 0:41:20.440
<v Speaker 4>A lot of the headlines been driven by partners and

0:41:20.560 --> 0:41:24.719
<v Speaker 4>competitors testimony. What has been for you the biggest headline

0:41:24.719 --> 0:41:29.360
<v Speaker 4>about how some of those witnesses have described the market

0:41:29.640 --> 0:41:31.880
<v Speaker 4>and how they think this should be resolved.

0:41:33.160 --> 0:41:33.799
<v Speaker 9>So there's all.

0:41:34.239 --> 0:41:37.680
<v Speaker 22>The trial has been very forward looking because the Justice

0:41:37.680 --> 0:41:41.200
<v Speaker 22>Department wants to sort of prevent Google from getting a

0:41:41.239 --> 0:41:44.480
<v Speaker 22>monopoly in the next iteration, the next generation of search,

0:41:44.520 --> 0:41:49.960
<v Speaker 22>which is generative AI, and so there's been a lot

0:41:49.960 --> 0:41:54.120
<v Speaker 22>of testimony from companies like open Ai and Perplexity, and

0:41:54.200 --> 0:41:57.680
<v Speaker 22>even at Apple as well about how they want to

0:41:58.040 --> 0:42:01.880
<v Speaker 22>incorporate those types of products into the search, into their

0:42:02.160 --> 0:42:06.399
<v Speaker 22>browsers and their search engines. And Apple was sort of

0:42:06.640 --> 0:42:11.320
<v Speaker 22>which benefits immensely from Google's payments to something like twenty

0:42:11.360 --> 0:42:13.759
<v Speaker 22>billion dollars a year or more. They were sort of

0:42:14.160 --> 0:42:16.520
<v Speaker 22>it was very interesting to see them kind of downplay

0:42:16.560 --> 0:42:21.240
<v Speaker 22>the importance of Google's like current search product, their core product,

0:42:21.600 --> 0:42:26.120
<v Speaker 22>and play up the future of search being AI, which

0:42:26.200 --> 0:42:27.040
<v Speaker 22>I don't think.

0:42:26.920 --> 0:42:29.799
<v Speaker 9>Is wrong, but they also have a lot to.

0:42:29.760 --> 0:42:33.480
<v Speaker 22>Lose if they if those payments are cut off, so

0:42:33.520 --> 0:42:36.720
<v Speaker 22>they don't want they want to make Google's current products

0:42:36.719 --> 0:42:38.560
<v Speaker 22>seem less important, so the judge will leave.

0:42:38.480 --> 0:42:41.279
<v Speaker 4>It alone alphabet on course to shed one hundred and

0:42:41.320 --> 0:42:44.280
<v Speaker 4>thirty billion dollars in market cap this week alone. Bloomba's justisco,

0:42:44.600 --> 0:42:46.680
<v Speaker 4>thank you very much. That does it for this edition

0:42:46.880 --> 0:42:48.960
<v Speaker 4>A balloon bag technology character, it does.

0:42:49.120 --> 0:42:49.680
<v Speaker 5>What a week?

0:42:49.760 --> 0:42:52.239
<v Speaker 3>What a week of turbulence around tariffs. We have much

0:42:52.280 --> 0:42:54.960
<v Speaker 3>anticipated going into the Chinese negotiations, but look at what's

0:42:55.000 --> 0:42:57.600
<v Speaker 3>happened to Bitcoin ed over the last five training days,

0:42:57.640 --> 0:42:58.720
<v Speaker 3>up more than seven percent.

0:42:58.960 --> 0:43:01.239
<v Speaker 5>We clipsed that one hundred one thousand dollars mark as well.

0:43:01.280 --> 0:43:04.240
<v Speaker 5>It's risk on there. Don't forget to check out our podcast.

0:43:04.440 --> 0:43:05.560
<v Speaker 5>This is Brumo Technology