WEBVTT - Where To Invest $10,000 Right Now

0:00:07.000 --> 0:00:09.760
<v Speaker 1>Welcome new Trillions. I'm Joel Webber and I'm Eric bell

0:00:09.840 --> 0:00:14.720
<v Speaker 1>Tunas Eric, We've got a couple of colleagues we've been

0:00:14.720 --> 0:00:17.560
<v Speaker 1>on the show before, Ben Stepherman and Suzanne Woollye. You

0:00:17.640 --> 0:00:21.239
<v Speaker 1>might remember them from our great March Madness. Best ticker

0:00:21.400 --> 0:00:25.560
<v Speaker 1>contest been one, Yeah, Ben, one with empty, which is

0:00:25.600 --> 0:00:27.280
<v Speaker 1>the sort of death of the moll E t f

0:00:27.360 --> 0:00:31.639
<v Speaker 1>It it basically shorts mallstocks and uh, and he did

0:00:31.680 --> 0:00:33.280
<v Speaker 1>say it was a long term play because it hasn't

0:00:33.320 --> 0:00:37.200
<v Speaker 1>done well lately. It's down ten percent since he made

0:00:37.200 --> 0:00:40.280
<v Speaker 1>the call. And he bounced Suzanne Woolley with Move, which

0:00:40.320 --> 0:00:44.360
<v Speaker 1>is up now five pc since that contest. Yeah. Move,

0:00:44.440 --> 0:00:47.040
<v Speaker 1>It's interesting. Moves traditionally been thought of as the greatest

0:00:47.080 --> 0:00:50.599
<v Speaker 1>ticker of all time, but uh, not that day. It's

0:00:50.680 --> 0:00:54.000
<v Speaker 1>so sad and so unjust. So we welcome them back

0:00:54.040 --> 0:00:58.200
<v Speaker 1>to trillions. Uh. They work on Bloomberg News with me

0:00:58.920 --> 0:01:01.760
<v Speaker 1>ericson Bloomberg. Can tell back before I was in b

0:01:01.880 --> 0:01:05.039
<v Speaker 1>I I was in data and Suzanne Um. I was

0:01:05.120 --> 0:01:08.520
<v Speaker 1>contributing articles to Suzanne and the Personal Finance. You started

0:01:08.520 --> 0:01:12.840
<v Speaker 1>a blog, right it was you did so many great pieces.

0:01:12.880 --> 0:01:15.200
<v Speaker 1>We were like way ahead of the curve, and I

0:01:15.240 --> 0:01:17.640
<v Speaker 1>got approval from Data to submit articles this blog when

0:01:17.680 --> 0:01:20.880
<v Speaker 1>the blog ended, but then you allowed me to submit

0:01:21.000 --> 0:01:25.000
<v Speaker 1>articles because I just I used to be a financial journalist,

0:01:25.040 --> 0:01:26.600
<v Speaker 1>so I missed doing it. And then when I went

0:01:26.640 --> 0:01:28.760
<v Speaker 1>to b I that got shut down. They want all

0:01:28.760 --> 0:01:33.760
<v Speaker 1>my stuff to be sort of creative idea like the Radiohead.

0:01:34.200 --> 0:01:37.360
<v Speaker 1>She green lighted the Radiohead article, which became that one

0:01:37.400 --> 0:01:41.880
<v Speaker 1>episode of our Top Performing. But this episode of Trillions

0:01:41.920 --> 0:01:44.440
<v Speaker 1>is not about us. It's about you, guys, because you

0:01:44.520 --> 0:01:48.560
<v Speaker 1>also do uh something that's updated quarterly on Bloomberg dot

0:01:48.600 --> 0:01:53.600
<v Speaker 1>com that's called where to Invest ten thousand dollars right now.

0:01:53.920 --> 0:01:57.240
<v Speaker 1>It's so catchy, like it just makes you want to

0:01:57.240 --> 0:02:02.160
<v Speaker 1>click on it right now, give me the goods. It's

0:02:02.160 --> 0:02:04.680
<v Speaker 1>a it's a little it's got a tinge of BuzzFeed.

0:02:05.080 --> 0:02:07.520
<v Speaker 1>I know, I know it's true, a e t s

0:02:07.520 --> 0:02:09.840
<v Speaker 1>you should own and stop, you know, worrying about it.

0:02:09.880 --> 0:02:13.640
<v Speaker 1>And we always give advice about, you know, checking your portfolio,

0:02:13.760 --> 0:02:19.200
<v Speaker 1>checking your risks. You get the yeah, here's some spinach. Yeah,

0:02:19.200 --> 0:02:21.959
<v Speaker 1>the spinach first, and then it's like, I don't know hallapeno.

0:02:25.840 --> 0:02:28.560
<v Speaker 1>So in this episode of Tryans, we're to invest ten

0:02:28.560 --> 0:02:33.560
<v Speaker 1>tho dollars right now. Okay, so I really want to

0:02:33.560 --> 0:02:36.600
<v Speaker 1>know where I'm supposed to invest ten thousand dollars right now. Also,

0:02:36.639 --> 0:02:38.400
<v Speaker 1>if you have any insights on how I can get

0:02:38.400 --> 0:02:41.240
<v Speaker 1>ten thousand dollars right now, that'd be great too. But

0:02:41.360 --> 0:02:43.920
<v Speaker 1>before we kind of get into that, let's also just

0:02:43.960 --> 0:02:46.160
<v Speaker 1>take a step back and talk about what what's been

0:02:46.160 --> 0:02:48.160
<v Speaker 1>happening in the markets right now, because things got a

0:02:48.160 --> 0:02:50.800
<v Speaker 1>little bloody for a second. Yeah, the market went down

0:02:51.400 --> 0:02:54.360
<v Speaker 1>quite a bit last week, um and seems to be

0:02:54.400 --> 0:02:57.640
<v Speaker 1>coming back now. UM. I talked to a lot of

0:02:57.639 --> 0:02:59.960
<v Speaker 1>investors about it, and some of them were really brue

0:03:00.120 --> 0:03:04.040
<v Speaker 1>leaved because the valuations right now are just so high.

0:03:04.120 --> 0:03:06.080
<v Speaker 1>So if you're just if you're a professional, this might

0:03:06.120 --> 0:03:08.240
<v Speaker 1>be scary. But if you actually have your money, your

0:03:08.240 --> 0:03:11.560
<v Speaker 1>retirement money in the market, and you're that money is

0:03:11.600 --> 0:03:13.160
<v Speaker 1>coming out of your paycheck and go into your four

0:03:13.160 --> 0:03:15.880
<v Speaker 1>oh one K and you're buying at these prices, it

0:03:16.400 --> 0:03:18.799
<v Speaker 1>looks like there's not any good places to put your money.

0:03:18.919 --> 0:03:21.600
<v Speaker 1>You know. People keep saying, oh, emerging markets are this

0:03:21.720 --> 0:03:26.040
<v Speaker 1>great value, and then they've been really painful, really been

0:03:26.080 --> 0:03:28.400
<v Speaker 1>really tough. And then the US docks look great, but

0:03:28.440 --> 0:03:30.560
<v Speaker 1>they just look at the valuations. They're really high and

0:03:30.639 --> 0:03:32.680
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't look like you're gonna get my much return

0:03:32.720 --> 0:03:35.320
<v Speaker 1>from them. So it's like a relief rally, a bit

0:03:35.360 --> 0:03:37.880
<v Speaker 1>of a deep breath. But it's interesting because the market

0:03:37.920 --> 0:03:40.920
<v Speaker 1>has been going up for a long time. None of

0:03:40.960 --> 0:03:43.720
<v Speaker 1>the people you spoke with, you know, have this feeling that, Okay,

0:03:43.760 --> 0:03:45.800
<v Speaker 1>this is the big one. The market's really going to

0:03:45.920 --> 0:03:48.160
<v Speaker 1>go down now. It sounds like if everybody has that attitude,

0:03:48.160 --> 0:03:51.120
<v Speaker 1>that's exactly why these have really short bottoms. They can't.

0:03:51.160 --> 0:03:55.080
<v Speaker 1>They really bounced back very quickly. But when when it

0:03:55.160 --> 0:03:57.640
<v Speaker 1>was happening, it felt like, especially on Twitter, I mean,

0:03:57.640 --> 0:04:00.480
<v Speaker 1>the bears were coming out doing touchdown dances where you

0:04:00.480 --> 0:04:02.480
<v Speaker 1>know where all the bulls now and then boom, three

0:04:02.520 --> 0:04:05.480
<v Speaker 1>days later, we're back to normalcy. Right. I was. Actually

0:04:05.800 --> 0:04:07.920
<v Speaker 1>I was in Oklahoma, so I was out of the bubble.

0:04:07.960 --> 0:04:11.240
<v Speaker 1>I was reporting a story and I nobody mentioned the market.

0:04:11.720 --> 0:04:14.640
<v Speaker 1>The economy seemed to be doing amazingly. Everywhere I looked

0:04:14.640 --> 0:04:17.839
<v Speaker 1>there was new development, new new building, and um, I

0:04:17.880 --> 0:04:21.760
<v Speaker 1>think there's a mood talking to these investors, like they

0:04:21.800 --> 0:04:24.440
<v Speaker 1>see the economy and they just can't imagine a real

0:04:24.480 --> 0:04:27.440
<v Speaker 1>bear market in these economic conditions because it just feels

0:04:27.440 --> 0:04:30.080
<v Speaker 1>so good right now. On the flip side, let's face it,

0:04:30.160 --> 0:04:32.280
<v Speaker 1>the stock market went up for a little while when

0:04:32.279 --> 0:04:36.080
<v Speaker 1>the economy was a little was struggling. More so, can

0:04:36.120 --> 0:04:38.440
<v Speaker 1>the stock market still go up now the economy is good?

0:04:38.440 --> 0:04:41.440
<v Speaker 1>In other words, how much can stocks just go up

0:04:41.480 --> 0:04:43.880
<v Speaker 1>and up? People I talked to were like, Oh, I

0:04:43.880 --> 0:04:46.360
<v Speaker 1>don't think it'll be another It'll be another year before

0:04:46.400 --> 0:04:49.720
<v Speaker 1>it really crashes. But then again, like what's your risk

0:04:49.800 --> 0:04:52.400
<v Speaker 1>return here? Like? How much further can it really go up?

0:04:52.760 --> 0:04:54.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't think people feel like it's good. They're gonna

0:04:54.920 --> 0:04:56.680
<v Speaker 1>lose a lot of money right now, but they don't

0:04:56.720 --> 0:04:59.440
<v Speaker 1>see themselves making a lot of money either. So been

0:04:59.520 --> 0:05:02.680
<v Speaker 1>with the people that you spoke with? Did they view

0:05:02.720 --> 0:05:07.920
<v Speaker 1>this last little spasm as a buying opportunity? Um? Yeah,

0:05:07.960 --> 0:05:11.080
<v Speaker 1>a few people did. Nobody was panicking, that's for sure.

0:05:11.240 --> 0:05:14.960
<v Speaker 1>Some people were investing more. I actually worry about some

0:05:15.000 --> 0:05:16.240
<v Speaker 1>of the people I was talking to you. I mean,

0:05:16.279 --> 0:05:18.479
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of folks in their sixties and seventies

0:05:18.520 --> 0:05:23.719
<v Speaker 1>who are stocks stock stocks. So if the market actually

0:05:23.760 --> 0:05:28.479
<v Speaker 1>does go down, um, and they're on the verge of retirement,

0:05:28.560 --> 0:05:31.359
<v Speaker 1>they're actually in some trouble. So I actually do worry

0:05:31.400 --> 0:05:34.760
<v Speaker 1>about now that we're this many years into this bowl market,

0:05:35.320 --> 0:05:37.040
<v Speaker 1>where how far out on a ledge and a lot

0:05:37.040 --> 0:05:40.320
<v Speaker 1>of folks are. I agree, because there's some really pretty

0:05:40.400 --> 0:05:43.760
<v Speaker 1>subpower estimates for the SMP going forward over the next decade.

0:05:43.800 --> 0:05:47.440
<v Speaker 1>I think morning Star respects real you know, injusted inflation

0:05:47.440 --> 0:05:51.080
<v Speaker 1>adjusted returns of something like one point five percent or

0:05:51.279 --> 0:05:54.039
<v Speaker 1>two or I think maybe even lower. So if you

0:05:54.080 --> 0:05:57.080
<v Speaker 1>get whacked in a downturn and you don't have time

0:05:57.120 --> 0:06:01.279
<v Speaker 1>to recover, it's it's a really dangerous thing to have

0:06:01.320 --> 0:06:04.320
<v Speaker 1>happened early in retirement because you just it's very hard

0:06:04.320 --> 0:06:10.840
<v Speaker 1>to earn that money back. Okay, so let's get to

0:06:10.880 --> 0:06:13.720
<v Speaker 1>the goods. I got ten dollars, would always spend it.

0:06:14.440 --> 0:06:19.760
<v Speaker 1>Oh sorry, invested, that's a totally different article. Yeah, we'll

0:06:19.760 --> 0:06:23.840
<v Speaker 1>do that next a fun weekend. Well, if you're a

0:06:23.960 --> 0:06:28.799
<v Speaker 1>russ Coast rich um at black Rock, you would look

0:06:28.880 --> 0:06:33.359
<v Speaker 1>at cheap Asian equities. He thinks Japan is cheap, and

0:06:33.480 --> 0:06:37.039
<v Speaker 1>Japan is usually trades little cheaply, but he thinks, you know,

0:06:37.080 --> 0:06:40.240
<v Speaker 1>there's a good reason now why it shouldn't be trading

0:06:40.279 --> 0:06:44.520
<v Speaker 1>at such a discount, and he also likes UM stocks

0:06:44.520 --> 0:06:49.400
<v Speaker 1>in South Korea. And what do you like about South Korea? Well,

0:06:50.000 --> 0:06:53.760
<v Speaker 1>South Korean equities, he said, UM are not only like

0:06:53.839 --> 0:06:59.000
<v Speaker 1>the cheapest equities in the emerging markets, but even looking

0:06:59.040 --> 0:07:02.560
<v Speaker 1>across like aquity is sovereign debt credit there by some

0:07:02.600 --> 0:07:05.599
<v Speaker 1>measures the cheapest asset class. So really it's just the

0:07:05.680 --> 0:07:10.080
<v Speaker 1>pure cheapness I think as opposed to the real fundamental

0:07:10.520 --> 0:07:13.200
<v Speaker 1>And Eric, you got a ticker that gives me some

0:07:13.240 --> 0:07:15.840
<v Speaker 1>exposure there, yes, so on on these articles, I will

0:07:15.880 --> 0:07:17.560
<v Speaker 1>give the e t F to play it. I picked

0:07:17.600 --> 0:07:20.120
<v Speaker 1>e w J. I mean rust works at black Rock.

0:07:20.200 --> 0:07:21.960
<v Speaker 1>It's also the most liquid. E w J is a

0:07:21.960 --> 0:07:25.640
<v Speaker 1>big Japan et F. However, if you are more cost

0:07:25.640 --> 0:07:28.360
<v Speaker 1>conscious and don't need that liquidity, there's a whole new

0:07:28.440 --> 0:07:31.960
<v Speaker 1>The fee war has broken out everywhere, including Japan, so

0:07:32.000 --> 0:07:34.440
<v Speaker 1>you can get the Franklin foot see Japan ETF for

0:07:34.520 --> 0:07:37.480
<v Speaker 1>nine basis points. Now, I mean that's Van Guardian level

0:07:38.240 --> 0:07:40.640
<v Speaker 1>and the JP Morgan b b j P which is

0:07:40.720 --> 0:07:43.280
<v Speaker 1>nineteen basis points, and they effectively do the same thing.

0:07:43.360 --> 0:07:45.720
<v Speaker 1>But some investors like the currency hedge in Japan, d

0:07:45.880 --> 0:07:48.120
<v Speaker 1>x J was a huge hit, which it's actually doing

0:07:48.120 --> 0:07:49.720
<v Speaker 1>a little better than a W J because the dollar

0:07:49.760 --> 0:07:51.040
<v Speaker 1>has gotten strong. So if you think the dollar is

0:07:51.080 --> 0:07:53.400
<v Speaker 1>gonna be strong, you might want a currency hedge over there.

0:07:53.440 --> 0:07:55.800
<v Speaker 1>But also one of the interesting thing that Japan and

0:07:55.840 --> 0:07:58.920
<v Speaker 1>South Korea, Um, you know a lot of these Asian

0:07:58.920 --> 0:08:01.320
<v Speaker 1>countries and Japan aren't in an E t F together.

0:08:01.400 --> 0:08:04.360
<v Speaker 1>It's it's weird. There's like emerging market Asia E t

0:08:04.520 --> 0:08:07.600
<v Speaker 1>F S, then there's Japan, Asia X Japan. It was

0:08:07.640 --> 0:08:09.640
<v Speaker 1>tough to find them all together. So you could do

0:08:09.680 --> 0:08:12.760
<v Speaker 1>E w J plus A x J. A x J

0:08:13.120 --> 0:08:16.480
<v Speaker 1>is a Asia E t F that is X Japan.

0:08:16.800 --> 0:08:19.760
<v Speaker 1>So it has China, South Korea, Hong Kong, Taiwan or

0:08:19.840 --> 0:08:24.480
<v Speaker 1>v A. The vanguard Developed Developed International has Japan, and

0:08:24.520 --> 0:08:27.160
<v Speaker 1>it also considers South Korea developed, so it's in there.

0:08:27.440 --> 0:08:29.560
<v Speaker 1>So you get both in that. But then again you

0:08:29.560 --> 0:08:31.040
<v Speaker 1>get a lot of other countries with that too. I

0:08:31.120 --> 0:08:35.120
<v Speaker 1>love that South Korea is still not always considered a

0:08:35.160 --> 0:08:37.920
<v Speaker 1>developed market. It's still emerging. It's like, I know, you

0:08:38.000 --> 0:08:40.959
<v Speaker 1>go there and it's like, are you kidding me? This

0:08:41.000 --> 0:08:43.400
<v Speaker 1>is like more advanced than the US. When I when

0:08:43.440 --> 0:08:46.120
<v Speaker 1>I was writing at this, uh, this piece up both

0:08:46.240 --> 0:08:48.560
<v Speaker 1>you know my editor and the copy editor asked me

0:08:48.600 --> 0:08:52.160
<v Speaker 1>to check that South Korea was indeed classified as that emerging.

0:08:52.360 --> 0:08:57.160
<v Speaker 1>So is Russ a recurring character? Yes, So that's part

0:08:57.200 --> 0:09:00.240
<v Speaker 1>of this exercise. You've got this little panel. Every order

0:09:00.320 --> 0:09:02.000
<v Speaker 1>you go back to them and say, what are we

0:09:02.080 --> 0:09:05.120
<v Speaker 1>going to buy a ten thousand dollars with right now? Yep? Yep?

0:09:05.320 --> 0:09:11.079
<v Speaker 1>So how was Russ's last time? Last time? What did Russ? Um?

0:09:11.160 --> 0:09:15.559
<v Speaker 1>He said, the same thing emerging Asia Pacific. He's the

0:09:15.600 --> 0:09:21.720
<v Speaker 1>same thing last quarter. He You know, Russ is literally

0:09:24.000 --> 0:09:27.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, I can't always get them to change things.

0:09:31.040 --> 0:09:33.800
<v Speaker 1>So we got five, We've done one. Who's number two.

0:09:33.960 --> 0:09:38.840
<v Speaker 1>We've got Sarah Ketterer. She's with Causeway Capital and she

0:09:38.960 --> 0:09:42.760
<v Speaker 1>thinks that a that value may finally start to triumph

0:09:42.760 --> 0:09:46.400
<v Speaker 1>over growth, which is would be a really big change,

0:09:46.400 --> 0:09:51.080
<v Speaker 1>which I don't believe. Eric agrees with no. Right, it

0:09:51.120 --> 0:09:53.800
<v Speaker 1>has to come back essentially, someone on Twitter the Day

0:09:53.880 --> 0:09:55.960
<v Speaker 1>some time in our lifetimes, yeah, right, at some point

0:09:56.080 --> 0:09:58.840
<v Speaker 1>someone on Twitter the Day said what song best describes

0:09:58.880 --> 0:10:01.600
<v Speaker 1>like value investing right now? And the answers were epic.

0:10:01.640 --> 0:10:06.000
<v Speaker 1>They were like, everybody hurts, don't stop believing. Um. There

0:10:06.080 --> 0:10:08.480
<v Speaker 1>was some classics on there, and I realized that a

0:10:08.480 --> 0:10:11.520
<v Speaker 1>lot of songs are about pain, and that's what value

0:10:11.520 --> 0:10:13.760
<v Speaker 1>investing is about. It's about how long can you take

0:10:13.760 --> 0:10:18.640
<v Speaker 1>the pain? But eventually you'll be right. The question is when, yeah,

0:10:18.679 --> 0:10:24.640
<v Speaker 1>can you last that long? But anyway, Sarah um liked

0:10:24.640 --> 0:10:29.280
<v Speaker 1>Global consumer staples and she actually chose uh tobacco stocks

0:10:30.080 --> 0:10:32.480
<v Speaker 1>within the staples, which she, you know, said as the

0:10:32.520 --> 0:10:38.079
<v Speaker 1>most maligned and possibly misunderstood segment. Obviously an unhealthy segment.

0:10:38.679 --> 0:10:42.679
<v Speaker 1>But she thinks that combustible traditional cigarettes are gonna go away,

0:10:43.160 --> 0:10:46.240
<v Speaker 1>more people are gonna start vaping, which we're seeing, not

0:10:46.360 --> 0:10:49.080
<v Speaker 1>that that's healthy might do, but and that you know,

0:10:49.920 --> 0:10:54.720
<v Speaker 1>while the regulations about around vaping get established, the smaller

0:10:54.840 --> 0:10:57.120
<v Speaker 1>entrants are going to have a harder time, you know,

0:10:57.160 --> 0:10:59.520
<v Speaker 1>with the costs of that greater regulation. So it gives

0:10:59.520 --> 0:11:03.760
<v Speaker 1>the income been big tobacco companies and Edge and Eric,

0:11:03.800 --> 0:11:08.280
<v Speaker 1>I think you found sort of a dividend index because

0:11:08.280 --> 0:11:10.360
<v Speaker 1>part of what part of her argument was to find

0:11:10.480 --> 0:11:13.679
<v Speaker 1>high dividend yielding stocks. So how did you screen for that?

0:11:14.040 --> 0:11:16.480
<v Speaker 1>This was a tough one. Most of them are pretty easy,

0:11:16.559 --> 0:11:18.200
<v Speaker 1>to be honest with you, which is good because I'm

0:11:18.240 --> 0:11:21.679
<v Speaker 1>usually doing this in a rush, but this one was hard. Um.

0:11:21.720 --> 0:11:24.520
<v Speaker 1>I think I did a screen for it um dividend

0:11:24.520 --> 0:11:27.920
<v Speaker 1>fun with at least such and such in staples, and

0:11:28.000 --> 0:11:30.199
<v Speaker 1>this one came to the top. I started kicking it around.

0:11:30.200 --> 0:11:31.959
<v Speaker 1>I'm like, you know what, this is pretty perfect. It's

0:11:31.960 --> 0:11:35.640
<v Speaker 1>the first Trust morning Star Dividend Leaders FDL. It screens

0:11:35.640 --> 0:11:39.280
<v Speaker 1>for stocks that have dividend consistency. Then it picks the

0:11:39.360 --> 0:11:43.080
<v Speaker 1>hundred highest yielding names. It's heavy consumer staples and big

0:11:43.120 --> 0:11:46.160
<v Speaker 1>tobacco companies are in the top ten holdings. And it's

0:11:46.200 --> 0:11:48.240
<v Speaker 1>got it. It's pretty good one point four billion, so

0:11:48.280 --> 0:11:51.199
<v Speaker 1>it's got nice tight spreads, very liquid charges point four

0:11:51.240 --> 0:11:54.080
<v Speaker 1>or so. It seemed to fit the bill for what

0:11:54.160 --> 0:11:56.240
<v Speaker 1>she was looking for. Ben, how do you feel about

0:11:56.240 --> 0:12:00.320
<v Speaker 1>investing in tobacco? Oh? I was actually thinking about dividend

0:12:00.400 --> 0:12:02.920
<v Speaker 1>stocks and how I might not want to invest in

0:12:03.320 --> 0:12:07.120
<v Speaker 1>those either. Tobacco it seems like too narrow a play

0:12:07.160 --> 0:12:09.200
<v Speaker 1>to me. It just seems like for me, for me,

0:12:09.280 --> 0:12:11.680
<v Speaker 1>I'd like to be more diversified. But with dividends, I

0:12:11.720 --> 0:12:13.520
<v Speaker 1>was thinking, like, what do you get like a two

0:12:13.559 --> 0:12:16.440
<v Speaker 1>percent yield? Like rates are arising, Like you can do

0:12:16.480 --> 0:12:18.400
<v Speaker 1>better with bonds and that's a lot safer, Like why

0:12:18.760 --> 0:12:22.240
<v Speaker 1>why why why the dividend play now much less risk?

0:12:22.520 --> 0:12:25.840
<v Speaker 1>You know, the FDL I think it it yielded a

0:12:25.960 --> 0:12:29.640
<v Speaker 1>three point four percent So still though, I see what

0:12:29.640 --> 0:12:32.640
<v Speaker 1>you're saying. These you know, we looked recently, you know,

0:12:32.960 --> 0:12:35.400
<v Speaker 1>a lot of dividend e t F yield less than

0:12:35.440 --> 0:12:37.480
<v Speaker 1>the tenure Now, I mean it's a lot of them,

0:12:37.640 --> 0:12:40.760
<v Speaker 1>including big ones. So the ones that yield more typically

0:12:40.880 --> 0:12:43.760
<v Speaker 1>tip into utilities and staples, so you definitely have this

0:12:44.040 --> 0:12:47.240
<v Speaker 1>rate risk more with those. So it's a you're right,

0:12:47.280 --> 0:12:50.000
<v Speaker 1>there's much more risk. They look very innocent, don't they. Yeah,

0:12:50.080 --> 0:12:52.800
<v Speaker 1>it's it's this play that we've heard about for years

0:12:52.840 --> 0:12:55.360
<v Speaker 1>and years and years. You know, it's safe, you know,

0:12:55.480 --> 0:12:58.480
<v Speaker 1>dividend stocks, But but do you lend that could change

0:12:58.520 --> 0:13:01.160
<v Speaker 1>These people in Oklahoma that you talked to, you said

0:13:01.160 --> 0:13:03.240
<v Speaker 1>they're heavy equities. Do you think part of the heavy

0:13:03.240 --> 0:13:06.839
<v Speaker 1>equities is going into high dividend yielding stocks to make

0:13:06.960 --> 0:13:08.920
<v Speaker 1>up for the fact that they couldn't get yields. And

0:13:09.280 --> 0:13:10.960
<v Speaker 1>I think that's totally true. They didn't want to be

0:13:10.960 --> 0:13:12.520
<v Speaker 1>in bonds and they didn't want to be in cash

0:13:12.559 --> 0:13:15.760
<v Speaker 1>because they saw that losing out to you know, to

0:13:15.760 --> 0:13:18.040
<v Speaker 1>to inflation, Like they couldn't keep up with inflation with

0:13:18.200 --> 0:13:21.840
<v Speaker 1>some of that stuff, and and now they have other alternatives,

0:13:21.840 --> 0:13:33.160
<v Speaker 1>I think, okay. Number three. Number three is Ann Harnett,

0:13:33.200 --> 0:13:37.120
<v Speaker 1>who is the chief investimate strategist at Absolute Strategy Research.

0:13:37.200 --> 0:13:42.280
<v Speaker 1>He's out of London, and his idea, his favorite move

0:13:42.360 --> 0:13:45.559
<v Speaker 1>is to go along on treasuries. Um. We've obviously seen

0:13:45.760 --> 0:13:50.160
<v Speaker 1>a lot of turmolent treasuries lately. Um, and this one,

0:13:50.240 --> 0:13:52.600
<v Speaker 1>this was the one that seemed a little a little

0:13:53.120 --> 0:13:56.800
<v Speaker 1>um out of step with the news cycle. Yeah, yeah,

0:13:56.800 --> 0:14:00.560
<v Speaker 1>that's true, but um, you know, he really he thinks

0:14:00.600 --> 0:14:03.959
<v Speaker 1>that people should go by long dated bonds all the

0:14:04.000 --> 0:14:06.920
<v Speaker 1>way up to the thirty year with fields close to

0:14:06.960 --> 0:14:09.560
<v Speaker 1>three point four per cent. You know. He points out

0:14:09.600 --> 0:14:11.840
<v Speaker 1>that even the Hawks don't expect more than four rape

0:14:11.920 --> 0:14:14.000
<v Speaker 1>rises in the coming year. So that was one of

0:14:14.080 --> 0:14:17.640
<v Speaker 1>his ideas. And the other another one that I thought

0:14:17.679 --> 0:14:22.160
<v Speaker 1>was interesting was by US exposed stocks and markets that

0:14:22.200 --> 0:14:25.880
<v Speaker 1>have sold off aggressively for other reasons. So he mentioned

0:14:25.920 --> 0:14:31.320
<v Speaker 1>things like Fiat Chrysler Automotives and Loxotic Group they both

0:14:31.360 --> 0:14:34.320
<v Speaker 1>have over their sales in the US, and he sort

0:14:34.320 --> 0:14:37.640
<v Speaker 1>of saw that as a a cheap way into buying

0:14:37.760 --> 0:14:40.320
<v Speaker 1>US earnings. How do you feel about that one? Eric?

0:14:41.080 --> 0:14:42.920
<v Speaker 1>For that one, I honed it on the treasuries, and

0:14:43.160 --> 0:14:47.200
<v Speaker 1>he was he seemed to love all treasuries, the ones

0:14:47.240 --> 0:14:49.000
<v Speaker 1>on the short end, the middle, and the long end

0:14:49.000 --> 0:14:51.200
<v Speaker 1>of the curve. So I went with g o VT,

0:14:51.440 --> 0:14:54.760
<v Speaker 1>which is a treasury e t F that invests in

0:14:54.800 --> 0:14:57.760
<v Speaker 1>the whole enjelata, so you get all the way you

0:14:57.800 --> 0:15:02.280
<v Speaker 1>know from He's a treasury and enjelata. I wanted to check,

0:15:02.400 --> 0:15:07.120
<v Speaker 1>I know you like it. I think a treasury enchilada

0:15:07.160 --> 0:15:09.440
<v Speaker 1>would be very like organic and you feel like you

0:15:09.440 --> 0:15:11.800
<v Speaker 1>didn't even eat after eating it. That's that would that

0:15:12.560 --> 0:15:17.000
<v Speaker 1>it would have iceberg lettuce. It does not sound like

0:15:17.040 --> 0:15:21.160
<v Speaker 1>a good enchilado in your back to the Oklahoma crowd,

0:15:22.320 --> 0:15:27.040
<v Speaker 1>this this focus group that we're now like, we have

0:15:27.200 --> 0:15:30.000
<v Speaker 1>seen that over the last two years, most of the

0:15:30.080 --> 0:15:35.400
<v Speaker 1>last twelve months. It seems Trump stuff doesn't really affect

0:15:35.440 --> 0:15:37.960
<v Speaker 1>the markets that much. The media goes nuts, markets don't move,

0:15:38.320 --> 0:15:41.440
<v Speaker 1>but rates. You really can see a lot of upheaval

0:15:41.480 --> 0:15:45.320
<v Speaker 1>in bondy tfs. How do investors over there um sort

0:15:45.320 --> 0:15:49.520
<v Speaker 1>of take in these gigantic variables like politics, and rates.

0:15:49.680 --> 0:15:51.800
<v Speaker 1>Do rates matter more or how do they feel? Like?

0:15:52.080 --> 0:15:54.280
<v Speaker 1>You know, actually heard more about the hurricane than I

0:15:54.320 --> 0:15:57.760
<v Speaker 1>did about Trump. What Trump said about the Feds seemed

0:15:57.760 --> 0:16:00.640
<v Speaker 1>to spook a few people. He was mending on that.

0:16:00.840 --> 0:16:04.760
<v Speaker 1>But otherwise, you know, I think your average like sixty

0:16:04.840 --> 0:16:06.880
<v Speaker 1>five year old retire you with two million dollars in

0:16:06.920 --> 0:16:09.880
<v Speaker 1>a portfolio or something, isn't probably watching the Fed as

0:16:09.920 --> 0:16:13.040
<v Speaker 1>closely as as we are here at Bloomberg World headquarters.

0:16:13.080 --> 0:16:21.200
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, we're in our little guaranteed Number four. Number

0:16:21.200 --> 0:16:24.800
<v Speaker 1>four is Jim Paulson of the Luthho Group. He was

0:16:25.040 --> 0:16:29.920
<v Speaker 1>cautious as he was um the quarter before he talked

0:16:29.920 --> 0:16:33.400
<v Speaker 1>about balanced investors might want to reduce their equity allocations

0:16:33.440 --> 0:16:36.760
<v Speaker 1>in favor of bonds even though yields are rising. Um.

0:16:36.960 --> 0:16:39.200
<v Speaker 1>But he was the one person who looked at gold

0:16:39.720 --> 0:16:42.320
<v Speaker 1>because it has been down a while since spring, although

0:16:42.440 --> 0:16:45.640
<v Speaker 1>recently it bounced back in all of this of this turmoil,

0:16:46.520 --> 0:16:52.000
<v Speaker 1>and Eric picked a couple of good gold ETFs new

0:16:52.040 --> 0:16:55.760
<v Speaker 1>generation news school. Yeah, everything's g l D and i AU,

0:16:55.880 --> 0:16:58.360
<v Speaker 1>but there's a ton of new ones out um the two.

0:17:00.200 --> 0:17:03.400
<v Speaker 1>Because if you're reading this, and you're probably retail, you're

0:17:03.440 --> 0:17:06.359
<v Speaker 1>probably really more focused on the expense ratio. You don't

0:17:06.359 --> 0:17:08.159
<v Speaker 1>need g l d s highly liquid volume. You're not

0:17:08.200 --> 0:17:11.120
<v Speaker 1>like Cowper's, Okay, so I went with the cheaper ones.

0:17:11.200 --> 0:17:14.080
<v Speaker 1>So the newer there's the new school goldietfs are cheap.

0:17:14.119 --> 0:17:17.280
<v Speaker 1>So for example, Bar and g l d M are

0:17:17.320 --> 0:17:20.800
<v Speaker 1>both eighteen basis points. But as we were writing this,

0:17:20.960 --> 0:17:24.800
<v Speaker 1>Bar cut its fee to point one, seven, four nine,

0:17:25.480 --> 0:17:29.320
<v Speaker 1>to be hundreds of the basis point cheaper than g

0:17:29.520 --> 0:17:32.399
<v Speaker 1>l d M. That's how hardcore the fee war is

0:17:32.440 --> 0:17:36.320
<v Speaker 1>getting how they how they how is it cheaper than

0:17:36.720 --> 0:17:39.040
<v Speaker 1>the usual ones, your usual suspects, and how do they

0:17:39.040 --> 0:17:42.600
<v Speaker 1>get it down that much more? So? Eighteen or seventeen

0:17:42.640 --> 0:17:45.119
<v Speaker 1>and a half, if you will, is more than twice

0:17:45.119 --> 0:17:47.840
<v Speaker 1>as cheap as g l D which is forty. So

0:17:48.400 --> 0:17:49.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, but when you're if you're used to paying

0:17:49.840 --> 0:17:53.200
<v Speaker 1>for funds, like you know, getting down to that level

0:17:53.200 --> 0:17:55.120
<v Speaker 1>it's almost a rounding error. But if you were thinking

0:17:55.119 --> 0:17:56.720
<v Speaker 1>about if you if you had an option to pay

0:17:56.760 --> 0:18:00.159
<v Speaker 1>forty dollars for something or eighteen or seventeen dollars that

0:18:00.240 --> 0:18:03.040
<v Speaker 1>same thing, I mean, everybody would pick the cheaper one.

0:18:03.520 --> 0:18:05.720
<v Speaker 1>So in a way, if you're going long term, those

0:18:06.080 --> 0:18:08.960
<v Speaker 1>those basis points will add up, so there's no reason

0:18:09.000 --> 0:18:10.959
<v Speaker 1>not to use these cheaper all. They're doing the same thing,

0:18:10.960 --> 0:18:13.080
<v Speaker 1>the story and golden the vault, and that's that there's

0:18:13.119 --> 0:18:15.199
<v Speaker 1>nothing different about them. So I'll sequel. You might as

0:18:15.240 --> 0:18:17.119
<v Speaker 1>well go for the cheaper one. G l D M,

0:18:17.160 --> 0:18:19.040
<v Speaker 1>in fact, was launched by g the g l D

0:18:19.160 --> 0:18:21.159
<v Speaker 1>people I called the minim g l D S minim

0:18:22.080 --> 0:18:25.280
<v Speaker 1>specifically to stave off this coming fee war. So now

0:18:25.320 --> 0:18:27.840
<v Speaker 1>they have like the big g l D which traders love,

0:18:27.880 --> 0:18:29.560
<v Speaker 1>and they can still charge a lot. Now they've got

0:18:29.600 --> 0:18:31.360
<v Speaker 1>the new one for Oh you want cheap, we got

0:18:31.400 --> 0:18:35.120
<v Speaker 1>that too. Now cheap gold. There you go, um Ben,

0:18:35.160 --> 0:18:37.480
<v Speaker 1>I want to ask you about people you talk to,

0:18:37.600 --> 0:18:40.600
<v Speaker 1>even beyond the Oklahoma crowd. What are the feelings of

0:18:40.640 --> 0:18:42.679
<v Speaker 1>gold out there? I know on Twitter you tend to

0:18:42.720 --> 0:18:45.919
<v Speaker 1>have bugs and haters and it's a very it's a

0:18:45.960 --> 0:18:50.520
<v Speaker 1>controversial asset class. Do you find that generally people use

0:18:50.600 --> 0:18:53.440
<v Speaker 1>gold or should they even use it? Is it? Is

0:18:53.480 --> 0:18:56.160
<v Speaker 1>it worth it? Well? I think you have the same

0:18:56.160 --> 0:18:59.880
<v Speaker 1>split among like regular investors you do among among professionals

0:19:00.040 --> 0:19:01.760
<v Speaker 1>like I don't see the point of it. If you're

0:19:01.760 --> 0:19:04.199
<v Speaker 1>asking my opinion, I don't get why you would want it,

0:19:04.560 --> 0:19:07.560
<v Speaker 1>especially these gold bugs who are like obsessed with with

0:19:07.640 --> 0:19:09.919
<v Speaker 1>these ETFs, like that you have to have the gold

0:19:10.040 --> 0:19:12.920
<v Speaker 1>in the vaults that they can like put like an

0:19:12.960 --> 0:19:16.160
<v Speaker 1>identification code on and like they know it's safe there

0:19:16.200 --> 0:19:17.600
<v Speaker 1>in case like the world comes to an end. I

0:19:17.600 --> 0:19:19.000
<v Speaker 1>don't know how you're going to get your gold from

0:19:19.040 --> 0:19:20.879
<v Speaker 1>London or wherever. The heck. This is if if the

0:19:20.960 --> 0:19:23.200
<v Speaker 1>world does come to an end. And further on your

0:19:23.400 --> 0:19:27.560
<v Speaker 1>gold storage issue, it's um there's actually gold ETFs that

0:19:27.720 --> 0:19:29.840
<v Speaker 1>store it in different places to appeal to those like

0:19:30.200 --> 0:19:33.520
<v Speaker 1>paranoid crowd types. So s g O L if you

0:19:33.560 --> 0:19:37.160
<v Speaker 1>are very paranoid, stores in Switzerland because and they'll say,

0:19:37.200 --> 0:19:41.840
<v Speaker 1>look Franklin Roosevelt confiscated gold and they don't trust any

0:19:41.880 --> 0:19:45.439
<v Speaker 1>Western country storing the gold. Then there's another one that

0:19:45.520 --> 0:19:47.760
<v Speaker 1>will send gold to your house when you redeem if

0:19:47.800 --> 0:19:50.080
<v Speaker 1>you want. It's a huge fee, But people like I

0:19:50.160 --> 0:19:52.119
<v Speaker 1>think that if you're gonna promise to do that, you

0:19:52.160 --> 0:19:54.919
<v Speaker 1>must be actually holding the gold. I think at some

0:19:54.960 --> 0:19:57.360
<v Speaker 1>point just by the gold bars yourself and like keep

0:19:57.400 --> 0:20:00.320
<v Speaker 1>them in your basement and go that direction. And Steve

0:20:00.359 --> 0:20:03.400
<v Speaker 1>Orman did a great story on that well, the question

0:20:03.560 --> 0:20:06.199
<v Speaker 1>is where do you put the gold when you get it?

0:20:06.720 --> 0:20:11.800
<v Speaker 1>And all these guys, um, they're all guys. They do

0:20:11.800 --> 0:20:14.320
<v Speaker 1>they do these crazy things where they like will paint

0:20:14.359 --> 0:20:16.640
<v Speaker 1>it black and use it as a doorstop, or they'll

0:20:16.640 --> 0:20:21.119
<v Speaker 1>bury it, ye black, the black thing on the ground

0:20:21.119 --> 0:20:23.879
<v Speaker 1>that really hurts if you stuff your toe on it.

0:20:24.119 --> 0:20:27.840
<v Speaker 1>And um. But the problem is then like they die

0:20:28.080 --> 0:20:30.760
<v Speaker 1>and then people can't find it, or people put their

0:20:30.800 --> 0:20:33.600
<v Speaker 1>gold in the ground and then they can't find remember

0:20:33.600 --> 0:20:38.320
<v Speaker 1>where they put it, and so in a safety deposit box.

0:20:38.320 --> 0:20:40.480
<v Speaker 1>They're worrried about somebody coming to their house and like

0:20:40.600 --> 0:20:42.879
<v Speaker 1>knows that you have gold and steals it. So they

0:20:42.920 --> 0:20:45.520
<v Speaker 1>paint it just in case that one thing happens. Yeah,

0:20:45.640 --> 0:20:48.560
<v Speaker 1>I've heard them using it in gardens. You know, they

0:20:48.600 --> 0:20:53.000
<v Speaker 1>sort of outlined the garden and like gold bricks pinched black.

0:20:53.040 --> 0:20:56.080
<v Speaker 1>I want to come to that garden, but you don't

0:20:56.080 --> 0:21:01.080
<v Speaker 1>want to. You don't want to hang out with that guy.

0:21:01.359 --> 0:21:05.480
<v Speaker 1>All right? Number five, Okay, number five was interesting. Um

0:21:05.680 --> 0:21:10.439
<v Speaker 1>Jim Hamill of Artisan Global he um is investing in

0:21:10.480 --> 0:21:14.119
<v Speaker 1>sort of they as a shop, invest in solid franchises,

0:21:14.600 --> 0:21:17.800
<v Speaker 1>stocks that are solid franchises, and he's into the digital

0:21:17.840 --> 0:21:22.080
<v Speaker 1>payment space, which he sees as you know, pretty recession proof.

0:21:22.359 --> 0:21:27.439
<v Speaker 1>UM A matter what, right. So he's big on a

0:21:27.520 --> 0:21:31.760
<v Speaker 1>number of stocks. They're domestically and abroad. And I looked

0:21:31.800 --> 0:21:34.760
<v Speaker 1>at his the holdings of some of the artisan funds

0:21:35.400 --> 0:21:40.480
<v Speaker 1>and they had stocks including like Visa, pug Ciguro, Digital World,

0:21:40.560 --> 0:21:44.720
<v Speaker 1>pig Q two holdings UM. And that's just like a

0:21:44.800 --> 0:21:49.719
<v Speaker 1>basic play on how we transact today. And Eric found up.

0:21:50.280 --> 0:21:52.240
<v Speaker 1>I think you picked I pay right. How did you

0:21:52.280 --> 0:21:56.080
<v Speaker 1>get exposure to that? UM? I think I just started

0:21:56.080 --> 0:22:00.399
<v Speaker 1>typing mobile payments and the autocomplete normally if you just

0:22:00.480 --> 0:22:03.200
<v Speaker 1>type of phrase, guarantee there's an e t F tracking,

0:22:04.000 --> 0:22:06.600
<v Speaker 1>the autocomplete will help you out UM. And sure enough

0:22:06.640 --> 0:22:08.879
<v Speaker 1>there was. I had recalled something out there that was

0:22:08.960 --> 0:22:11.879
<v Speaker 1>doing this, and I pay is the ticker. It's actually

0:22:12.000 --> 0:22:14.840
<v Speaker 1>really big for an indie e t F launch with

0:22:14.880 --> 0:22:17.040
<v Speaker 1>no big backing. It's from e t F MG group.

0:22:17.440 --> 0:22:20.840
<v Speaker 1>It's five million dollars. It's had a nice run. It's

0:22:20.920 --> 0:22:25.080
<v Speaker 1>up UM looks like since launching, and that's both in

0:22:25.119 --> 0:22:28.359
<v Speaker 1>the SMP and XLK, and it's got an active share

0:22:28.440 --> 0:22:31.960
<v Speaker 1>original exposure to the tech e tf so, but a

0:22:31.960 --> 0:22:34.200
<v Speaker 1>lot of the names you've heard of in here, um,

0:22:34.240 --> 0:22:36.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, like a Visa, master Card, American Express. But

0:22:36.720 --> 0:22:39.920
<v Speaker 1>then you get down after those and there's most companies

0:22:39.960 --> 0:22:43.440
<v Speaker 1>I have never heard of. So um, it's a decent

0:22:43.520 --> 0:22:46.080
<v Speaker 1>It passes some my my tests for being a decent

0:22:46.119 --> 0:22:49.320
<v Speaker 1>mobile payments play. The question that I don't know, which

0:22:49.680 --> 0:22:51.840
<v Speaker 1>it is hard to gauge, is how much of these

0:22:51.880 --> 0:22:56.000
<v Speaker 1>stocks here get revenue from the mobile payment trend. That's

0:22:56.040 --> 0:22:59.080
<v Speaker 1>another thing you should look at, you know, judging from this,

0:22:59.119 --> 0:23:01.600
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't look like it's a bunch of stocks that

0:23:01.720 --> 0:23:04.480
<v Speaker 1>everybody owns repackaged and put with a new name. It

0:23:04.520 --> 0:23:07.720
<v Speaker 1>looks pretty legit in my opinion. And million Is is

0:23:07.720 --> 0:23:14.680
<v Speaker 1>pretty decent. Okay, So we got one more and it's

0:23:14.680 --> 0:23:17.879
<v Speaker 1>our our token Vanguard guy because it used to be

0:23:17.880 --> 0:23:21.040
<v Speaker 1>one guy. Now it's a new guy. Yes, yes, um

0:23:21.119 --> 0:23:24.560
<v Speaker 1>Joe Davis who's their chief Global economist and head of

0:23:24.600 --> 0:23:29.480
<v Speaker 1>investment strategy, because um, the guy we had before went

0:23:29.560 --> 0:23:35.480
<v Speaker 1>to become Vanguard's first global chief risk officer, So so

0:23:35.640 --> 0:23:42.840
<v Speaker 1>his replacement. You know, Vanguard talks a lot about very

0:23:42.920 --> 0:23:48.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, good standard advice that Eric Weltunists finds really boring.

0:23:49.320 --> 0:23:52.119
<v Speaker 1>But it's one of those boring but important things about

0:23:52.119 --> 0:23:55.880
<v Speaker 1>diversifying and sort of looking at portfolio, maybe diversifying out

0:23:55.880 --> 0:23:59.080
<v Speaker 1>of fang stocks a little bit. But the main point

0:23:59.760 --> 0:24:03.520
<v Speaker 1>at ink, you know, Joe Davis made was basically like

0:24:04.560 --> 0:24:08.840
<v Speaker 1>over the long run, these blips they get canceled out. Um,

0:24:08.920 --> 0:24:12.560
<v Speaker 1>so he just you know, don't mark a time. Basically,

0:24:12.800 --> 0:24:16.359
<v Speaker 1>this article Vanguard should is probably not the right person

0:24:16.400 --> 0:24:18.280
<v Speaker 1>to ask because it's like, you know, where to invest

0:24:18.359 --> 0:24:21.199
<v Speaker 1>ten thousand? Vanguard's is not going to give a fun answer.

0:24:21.240 --> 0:24:24.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean that they're just gonna say diversify, and they

0:24:25.000 --> 0:24:27.199
<v Speaker 1>every time it comes I read it. Every quarter I

0:24:27.200 --> 0:24:29.640
<v Speaker 1>read it, I'm like, what am I going to pick here?

0:24:29.680 --> 0:24:33.480
<v Speaker 1>There's take the same one. VT Barrick yells at me

0:24:33.520 --> 0:24:36.239
<v Speaker 1>every year. I thought they're sort of like ballast, you know,

0:24:36.320 --> 0:24:39.240
<v Speaker 1>they're like the voice of yeah, you're right. This is

0:24:39.280 --> 0:24:41.480
<v Speaker 1>like the you know, the vegetables at the end of

0:24:41.480 --> 0:24:44.439
<v Speaker 1>this article, which is like truth be known, it's probably

0:24:44.480 --> 0:24:46.359
<v Speaker 1>best to just buy v T I, which is the

0:24:46.359 --> 0:24:49.719
<v Speaker 1>total stock market covers the whole thing for four basis points,

0:24:49.960 --> 0:24:51.840
<v Speaker 1>but the sec lending revenue goes back in so it

0:24:51.840 --> 0:24:55.080
<v Speaker 1>actually tracks perfectly. It's literally free exposure. You could not

0:24:55.240 --> 0:24:57.200
<v Speaker 1>get In fact, we were an article one day saying

0:24:57.440 --> 0:24:59.800
<v Speaker 1>this is as close to a perfect etf as possible.

0:25:00.160 --> 0:25:02.159
<v Speaker 1>It's huge. It's the third et f ever to hit

0:25:02.160 --> 0:25:04.840
<v Speaker 1>a hundred billion dollars for a reason. It's just so

0:25:05.200 --> 0:25:08.399
<v Speaker 1>easy and good. But it is definitely boring. Yeah, I know,

0:25:08.480 --> 0:25:10.960
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't give you much to work with. I'm sorry

0:25:10.960 --> 0:25:14.760
<v Speaker 1>about that. It does go up though, so that that's

0:25:14.760 --> 0:25:17.720
<v Speaker 1>not so terrible. And if you only had ten thousand dollars,

0:25:17.760 --> 0:25:19.959
<v Speaker 1>if that's all you had, like you probably shouldn't put

0:25:20.000 --> 0:25:22.919
<v Speaker 1>it all on tobacco stocks, totally know. If the article,

0:25:23.080 --> 0:25:25.280
<v Speaker 1>now that's a good if the articles, if you only

0:25:25.320 --> 0:25:28.160
<v Speaker 1>had ten thousand dollars, then the first five you gotta

0:25:28.160 --> 0:25:31.480
<v Speaker 1>get out, moved them to the top and make that

0:25:31.600 --> 0:25:36.280
<v Speaker 1>the end. Yeah. Absolutely, yep. So speaking of ten thousand dollars,

0:25:36.280 --> 0:25:38.760
<v Speaker 1>you've been doing this for a second, Suzanne, how long

0:25:38.800 --> 0:25:42.239
<v Speaker 1>have you been doing it since team we've been doing it?

0:25:42.400 --> 0:25:45.160
<v Speaker 1>And what do you think you've learned by doing it

0:25:45.560 --> 0:25:50.639
<v Speaker 1>and asking this question of so many different investors. Um,

0:25:50.680 --> 0:25:53.399
<v Speaker 1>I think I've learned that you know, there are so

0:25:53.440 --> 0:25:57.280
<v Speaker 1>many different ways to look at the market, and also

0:25:57.400 --> 0:26:01.800
<v Speaker 1>to just always keep a broad perspective, we get very

0:26:01.880 --> 0:26:04.560
<v Speaker 1>sort of zeroed in on the spire at it. We're

0:26:04.600 --> 0:26:06.959
<v Speaker 1>so you know, we're here in New York. We're just

0:26:07.040 --> 0:26:12.080
<v Speaker 1>in our own little little bubble. Um. I would never

0:26:12.119 --> 0:26:16.000
<v Speaker 1>have looked at South Korean South Korean equity market before.

0:26:16.400 --> 0:26:18.520
<v Speaker 1>So I mean I've I've learned a lot about sort

0:26:18.520 --> 0:26:22.359
<v Speaker 1>of what the opportunities are and that there always are opportunities.

0:26:22.440 --> 0:26:27.240
<v Speaker 1>I've also learned that Eric Beltunis is an invaluable resource.

0:26:28.280 --> 0:26:30.760
<v Speaker 1>He always pulls through for me. I send him like

0:26:30.760 --> 0:26:33.159
<v Speaker 1>a panick note, like I've I've got all the entries?

0:26:33.160 --> 0:26:35.000
<v Speaker 1>Can you write them up? But usually have all but one.

0:26:35.119 --> 0:26:36.960
<v Speaker 1>You're somebody who hasn't sent it in. I'm like, good

0:26:37.080 --> 0:26:42.040
<v Speaker 1>now that that person is buying me a little more time. So, Ben,

0:26:42.080 --> 0:26:47.879
<v Speaker 1>what have you learned by reading um? I am the

0:26:47.960 --> 0:26:50.480
<v Speaker 1>kind of person who just like reads the Vanguard thing

0:26:50.480 --> 0:26:52.320
<v Speaker 1>because I'm just as I said, I'm like, not fun

0:26:52.400 --> 0:26:54.680
<v Speaker 1>at all when it comes to investing. But I think

0:26:54.720 --> 0:26:58.200
<v Speaker 1>it's really interesting to hear about the fact that these

0:26:58.200 --> 0:27:01.920
<v Speaker 1>two really really smart people can completely disagree on everything

0:27:02.080 --> 0:27:04.600
<v Speaker 1>or be looking at completely different parts of the world.

0:27:05.000 --> 0:27:07.439
<v Speaker 1>And that's one of the great things about investing is

0:27:07.480 --> 0:27:12.000
<v Speaker 1>that it's very democratizing, very humbling. Ben, Suzanne, thanks for

0:27:12.080 --> 0:27:17.520
<v Speaker 1>joining us on Trillians. You can say something. You're welcome.

0:27:21.400 --> 0:27:24.280
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening to Trillions until next time. You can

0:27:24.280 --> 0:27:29.399
<v Speaker 1>find us on the Bloomberg Terminal, Bloomberg dot com, Apple Podcast, Spotify,

0:27:29.560 --> 0:27:32.080
<v Speaker 1>and wherever else you'd like to listen. We'd love to

0:27:32.080 --> 0:27:35.400
<v Speaker 1>hear from you. We're on Twitter, I'm at Joel Webber Show,

0:27:35.680 --> 0:27:40.000
<v Speaker 1>He's at Eric Ball Tunas, Ben Steveman is at b Steverman,

0:27:40.440 --> 0:27:43.760
<v Speaker 1>and Suzanne Woollie is at wealth Watch. What you get

0:27:43.840 --> 0:27:47.760
<v Speaker 1>that handle is. Trillions is produced by Magnus Hendrickson and

0:27:47.960 --> 0:27:51.399
<v Speaker 1>Jessica Levy is the head of Bloomberg Podcast. Bye.