WEBVTT - Generic Drugs and Marijuana Legislation

0:00:01.280 --> 0:00:05.119
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Opinion podcast. Catch us Saturdays

0:00:05.120 --> 0:00:08.280
<v Speaker 1>at one and seven pm Eastern on Bloomberg dot Com,

0:00:08.320 --> 0:00:11.479
<v Speaker 1>the iHeartRadio app and the Bloomberg Business App, or listen

0:00:11.520 --> 0:00:13.760
<v Speaker 1>on demand wherever you get your podcasts.

0:00:15.880 --> 0:00:19.479
<v Speaker 2>Welcome to Bloomberg Opinion I Amy Morris. This week we

0:00:19.600 --> 0:00:24.320
<v Speaker 2>look at medicine, from generic drugs to legalizing marijuana, mental

0:00:24.360 --> 0:00:29.000
<v Speaker 2>health to physical wellness. We'll talk with Jonathan Bernstein, who

0:00:29.040 --> 0:00:33.200
<v Speaker 2>makes the argument that legalizing marijuana would be good policy

0:00:33.240 --> 0:00:37.599
<v Speaker 2>for President Biden. And we're learning more about useless decongestants

0:00:38.040 --> 0:00:40.479
<v Speaker 2>and they're not the only over the counter products that

0:00:40.520 --> 0:00:43.879
<v Speaker 2>don't work as advertised. And we'll hear more about stress

0:00:43.880 --> 0:00:47.279
<v Speaker 2>from the pandemic and how it continues to linger. Now

0:00:47.320 --> 0:00:49.440
<v Speaker 2>we begin with generic drugs and how they may be

0:00:49.560 --> 0:00:52.400
<v Speaker 2>too cheap for their own good. More than ninety percent

0:00:52.440 --> 0:00:55.520
<v Speaker 2>of prescriptions in the US are filled with generic drugs.

0:00:55.600 --> 0:00:59.800
<v Speaker 2>These cheaper alternatives to branded medications have expanded access to

0:00:59.840 --> 0:01:03.840
<v Speaker 2>care for millions of Americans and saved the healthcare system

0:01:03.960 --> 0:01:07.400
<v Speaker 2>hundreds of billions of dollars each year. While the prices

0:01:07.440 --> 0:01:11.800
<v Speaker 2>of branded drugs have skyrocketed in recent years, generics prices

0:01:11.880 --> 0:01:15.880
<v Speaker 2>have been falling steadily, So what's the downside? Well, earlier

0:01:15.920 --> 0:01:18.720
<v Speaker 2>this year, Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer called the current

0:01:18.800 --> 0:01:23.399
<v Speaker 2>drug manufacturing system broken, citing a national shortage of nearly

0:01:23.480 --> 0:01:25.800
<v Speaker 2>three hundred critical drugs.

0:01:25.400 --> 0:01:29.479
<v Speaker 3>From cancer drugs to everyday generics that deal with things

0:01:29.520 --> 0:01:33.800
<v Speaker 3>like ADHD and asthma and even common infections. They're out

0:01:33.840 --> 0:01:37.800
<v Speaker 3>of stock. Our doctors and our patients are near panic.

0:01:37.920 --> 0:01:40.720
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so let's talk about this now. Bloomberg Opinion editor

0:01:40.840 --> 0:01:44.880
<v Speaker 2>Rachel Rosenthal joins us. Now, Rachel, how can prices for

0:01:45.120 --> 0:01:47.840
<v Speaker 2>in demand products fall too low? It seems like there

0:01:47.880 --> 0:01:49.080
<v Speaker 2>would be no downside.

0:01:49.200 --> 0:01:52.480
<v Speaker 4>It would sound like that, but as ever, in the

0:01:52.480 --> 0:01:56.080
<v Speaker 4>healthcare market, the laws of supply and demand don't exactly

0:01:56.360 --> 0:01:59.720
<v Speaker 4>meet up. So what you've got in the generic space,

0:02:00.520 --> 0:02:03.360
<v Speaker 4>which has been a great boon to patients and providers

0:02:03.360 --> 0:02:06.520
<v Speaker 4>in healthcare systems, which I mean generics have saved the

0:02:06.640 --> 0:02:10.919
<v Speaker 4>US healthcare system hundreds of billions of dollars, as you've mentioned,

0:02:10.919 --> 0:02:14.720
<v Speaker 4>you know, but when you've got prices that fall too low,

0:02:14.960 --> 0:02:17.840
<v Speaker 4>you end up with companies that go out of business,

0:02:17.880 --> 0:02:20.359
<v Speaker 4>and you think, like, well, how is that possible? You know, here,

0:02:20.400 --> 0:02:23.000
<v Speaker 4>I am like, if I'm desperate for medication, I'd be

0:02:23.000 --> 0:02:26.360
<v Speaker 4>willing to spend more. But the consumer doesn't necessarily have

0:02:26.400 --> 0:02:29.400
<v Speaker 4>a lot of buying power. When you get to the

0:02:29.400 --> 0:02:33.320
<v Speaker 4>prescription drug market, there are lots of intermediaries that buy

0:02:33.360 --> 0:02:37.560
<v Speaker 4>on behalf of us sitting here as employees of Bloomberg,

0:02:37.880 --> 0:02:41.280
<v Speaker 4>if you're an employee in many other places. And so

0:02:41.639 --> 0:02:44.359
<v Speaker 4>what they do is they sort of aggregate their buying power.

0:02:44.760 --> 0:02:50.200
<v Speaker 4>And because of that, because they have these massive amounts

0:02:50.200 --> 0:02:53.079
<v Speaker 4>of buying power that is sort of aggregated among other

0:02:53.120 --> 0:02:57.200
<v Speaker 4>buyers as well, they can become gatekeepers too, are access

0:02:57.200 --> 0:03:00.320
<v Speaker 4>to prescription drugs, and so they can push prices where

0:03:00.320 --> 0:03:03.360
<v Speaker 4>they want them to go, which is down and without

0:03:03.400 --> 0:03:06.160
<v Speaker 4>that sort of floor that would be sort of driven

0:03:06.160 --> 0:03:09.800
<v Speaker 4>by a competitive market. And these are often expressed in

0:03:10.240 --> 0:03:13.040
<v Speaker 4>sort of contract terms that we don't see, you know,

0:03:13.160 --> 0:03:15.760
<v Speaker 4>at the pharmacy counter, and we just wonder why why

0:03:15.800 --> 0:03:18.880
<v Speaker 4>did this company go out of business? And it can really,

0:03:18.919 --> 0:03:20.480
<v Speaker 4>it can be really hard for a lot of these

0:03:20.520 --> 0:03:24.720
<v Speaker 4>generics manufacturers to pay their rise in costs of labor

0:03:25.520 --> 0:03:30.000
<v Speaker 4>among a number of other inputs. And you know, this

0:03:30.080 --> 0:03:33.120
<v Speaker 4>is this is all sort of boiled down to we

0:03:33.240 --> 0:03:36.880
<v Speaker 4>have an artificially suppressed access to generic drugs.

0:03:37.520 --> 0:03:40.240
<v Speaker 2>So I want to understand this middleman issue. Then you

0:03:40.360 --> 0:03:43.040
<v Speaker 2>have this drug middleman who was able to influence the

0:03:43.080 --> 0:03:47.960
<v Speaker 2>retail market by aggregating the contracts with pharmaceutical companies.

0:03:48.880 --> 0:03:50.240
<v Speaker 4>So what they do, and you know, the way you

0:03:50.240 --> 0:03:52.960
<v Speaker 4>can think about it, or the easiest way, and this

0:03:53.000 --> 0:03:55.320
<v Speaker 4>will be an oversimplification if you look at any of

0:03:55.400 --> 0:03:57.840
<v Speaker 4>these sort of drug supply chain float charts, which I

0:03:57.840 --> 0:04:01.200
<v Speaker 4>don't necessarily recommend, if you think about it, there's there's

0:04:01.240 --> 0:04:05.600
<v Speaker 4>a generics manufacturer supplier. They need to get their product

0:04:05.800 --> 0:04:07.880
<v Speaker 4>to a pharmacy counter, you know, and where you and

0:04:07.920 --> 0:04:10.560
<v Speaker 4>I go pick up our prescriptions. In between, there's a

0:04:10.600 --> 0:04:15.880
<v Speaker 4>wholesale distributor, so they pick up, you know, those palettes

0:04:15.920 --> 0:04:19.200
<v Speaker 4>of pills and they bring them to the pharmacy. That's

0:04:19.480 --> 0:04:22.400
<v Speaker 4>really hard to get around, that wholesale distributor and middleman.

0:04:23.720 --> 0:04:27.400
<v Speaker 4>So you know, for their services, you know, the church fees.

0:04:27.440 --> 0:04:30.160
<v Speaker 4>That all makes sense, you know, But what happens what's

0:04:30.200 --> 0:04:35.400
<v Speaker 4>been happening recently in the retail drug market, the pharmacies

0:04:35.440 --> 0:04:39.800
<v Speaker 4>and the wholesale distributors have been joining joining forces effectively,

0:04:39.920 --> 0:04:44.159
<v Speaker 4>and they've become sort of what's called retail buying groups

0:04:44.200 --> 0:04:47.400
<v Speaker 4>for lack of a better term, and they have because

0:04:47.440 --> 0:04:51.599
<v Speaker 4>they you can't get your pill to the counter without

0:04:51.640 --> 0:04:56.400
<v Speaker 4>these guys. Then they become very very powerful and determining prices.

0:04:56.760 --> 0:05:00.839
<v Speaker 2>How much responsibility then, does the drug manufacture are bear

0:05:00.960 --> 0:05:01.200
<v Speaker 2>in this?

0:05:01.720 --> 0:05:05.640
<v Speaker 4>It's really important to distinguish between generic drugs and branded drugs.

0:05:06.120 --> 0:05:10.520
<v Speaker 4>So branded drugs almost by definition have no rival, you know,

0:05:10.640 --> 0:05:13.320
<v Speaker 4>and so they what we see in the in the

0:05:13.360 --> 0:05:16.880
<v Speaker 4>branded drug space is the conversation that has overtaken the

0:05:16.880 --> 0:05:20.800
<v Speaker 4>public sector, the public sphere, and conversations in Congress about staggering.

0:05:21.000 --> 0:05:23.280
<v Speaker 4>All we hear about is usually staggering the high drug

0:05:23.320 --> 0:05:27.000
<v Speaker 4>prices and how damaging they can be, and that that's

0:05:27.000 --> 0:05:29.960
<v Speaker 4>really because there's no competition there, you know, very little competition,

0:05:30.440 --> 0:05:34.160
<v Speaker 4>direct competition in the generic space. You know, it's it's

0:05:34.240 --> 0:05:36.600
<v Speaker 4>quite different, you know, because of the Hatchwaksmann Act, which

0:05:36.640 --> 0:05:42.600
<v Speaker 4>was passed nineteen eighty four, You've got the very definition

0:05:42.720 --> 0:05:46.880
<v Speaker 4>was generic drugs will are equivalent to each other and

0:05:47.000 --> 0:05:49.400
<v Speaker 4>to the branded drug and so you get what is

0:05:49.440 --> 0:05:51.840
<v Speaker 4>up happening is once a patent expires, you get this

0:05:52.160 --> 0:05:54.880
<v Speaker 4>rush to get into that for to be that first

0:05:54.960 --> 0:05:58.159
<v Speaker 4>generics maker to be able to compete, you know, and

0:05:58.200 --> 0:06:02.200
<v Speaker 4>so and if you are the first one, then you

0:06:02.240 --> 0:06:04.440
<v Speaker 4>get one hundred and eighty days of exclusivity. So that's

0:06:04.480 --> 0:06:06.760
<v Speaker 4>a huge I mean, that's why, that's why this whole

0:06:06.839 --> 0:06:09.960
<v Speaker 4>game keeps going because it can be very lucrative in

0:06:09.960 --> 0:06:12.599
<v Speaker 4>those first six months. So what you end up with

0:06:12.760 --> 0:06:17.680
<v Speaker 4>is very different from the branded space. You've got one.

0:06:18.680 --> 0:06:20.960
<v Speaker 4>In the generic space, you have many, many, many competitors,

0:06:21.000 --> 0:06:24.200
<v Speaker 4>and that that sort of drives the prices lower.

0:06:24.760 --> 0:06:27.960
<v Speaker 2>Now, you mentioned the Hatch Waxman Act that was back

0:06:27.960 --> 0:06:32.680
<v Speaker 2>in the mid eighties. Correct, just for our audience, just

0:06:32.720 --> 0:06:34.640
<v Speaker 2>a background. What does that act to do?

0:06:34.920 --> 0:06:37.920
<v Speaker 4>Sure, so that was really like the basis of the

0:06:38.000 --> 0:06:41.640
<v Speaker 4>generic drugs, the generic drug market as it exists today.

0:06:41.640 --> 0:06:44.159
<v Speaker 4>And you know it was I think it was designed

0:06:44.160 --> 0:06:47.440
<v Speaker 4>to both protect you know, to protect innovation, so to

0:06:47.560 --> 0:06:51.479
<v Speaker 4>make it to give incentives for branded drug companies to

0:06:52.600 --> 0:06:54.160
<v Speaker 4>in that. I mean, you know, there's a tremendous amount

0:06:54.200 --> 0:06:56.160
<v Speaker 4>of R and D that goes into you know, many

0:06:56.200 --> 0:06:58.719
<v Speaker 4>men and we've heard these statistics many many failures before

0:06:58.800 --> 0:07:01.320
<v Speaker 4>one successful drugs, and so I think part of this

0:07:01.480 --> 0:07:04.359
<v Speaker 4>was designed to sort of protect that incentive to innovate

0:07:04.440 --> 0:07:07.760
<v Speaker 4>and invest heavily, uh, you know, and then you know,

0:07:07.760 --> 0:07:11.320
<v Speaker 4>I think the there are certain guide posts to when

0:07:11.920 --> 0:07:15.680
<v Speaker 4>generics can enter in the market, and then you know,

0:07:15.680 --> 0:07:19.240
<v Speaker 4>there's certain exclusivity windows, as I mentioned before, and I

0:07:19.280 --> 0:07:23.560
<v Speaker 4>think sort of the the founding principle of patch Waxmen

0:07:23.760 --> 0:07:27.240
<v Speaker 4>was that, as I mentioned earlier, that generic drugs are

0:07:27.280 --> 0:07:30.560
<v Speaker 4>all equal to each other, and that if I take

0:07:30.760 --> 0:07:34.120
<v Speaker 4>generic from manufacturer A, it is chemically the same as

0:07:34.160 --> 0:07:39.560
<v Speaker 4>generic Manufacturer B is the same as branded drug you

0:07:39.600 --> 0:07:42.720
<v Speaker 4>know X, you know, and so I think as as

0:07:42.760 --> 0:07:45.960
<v Speaker 4>patients as people who take medicine, there have been many

0:07:45.960 --> 0:07:49.360
<v Speaker 4>many reports that that might not necessarily be true because

0:07:49.560 --> 0:07:53.680
<v Speaker 4>you know, the active ingredients can or the accipients or

0:07:53.720 --> 0:07:56.240
<v Speaker 4>you know, the different parts of the medication that are

0:07:56.240 --> 0:07:59.120
<v Speaker 4>supposed to do different things can can interact with your

0:07:59.160 --> 0:08:02.040
<v Speaker 4>body differently, you know. And I think people have heard

0:08:02.040 --> 0:08:05.320
<v Speaker 4>a lot about this, as there are increasing numbers of shortages,

0:08:06.200 --> 0:08:09.440
<v Speaker 4>efforts at pharmacies to sort of substitute has not always

0:08:09.480 --> 0:08:12.360
<v Speaker 4>been smooth. But that sort of explains that that sort

0:08:12.360 --> 0:08:15.119
<v Speaker 4>of principle has sort of been a double edged sort

0:08:15.160 --> 0:08:17.480
<v Speaker 4>of like that generics are all equal to each other,

0:08:18.000 --> 0:08:22.920
<v Speaker 4>because it does make it very difficult to discriminate between

0:08:23.560 --> 0:08:25.880
<v Speaker 4>when you're a patient, particularly and you go to the county,

0:08:25.920 --> 0:08:27.680
<v Speaker 4>you know, and you go to your fill your prescription

0:08:28.240 --> 0:08:31.960
<v Speaker 4>to say, oh, you know, I don't want this generic,

0:08:32.520 --> 0:08:34.600
<v Speaker 4>you know, from this company, but I'd prefer the generic

0:08:34.600 --> 0:08:35.360
<v Speaker 4>from that company.

0:08:35.760 --> 0:08:38.640
<v Speaker 2>And we are talking with Bloomberg Opinion editor Rachel Rosenthal

0:08:38.679 --> 0:08:41.800
<v Speaker 2>about how some generic drugs may be too cheap for

0:08:41.840 --> 0:08:46.560
<v Speaker 2>their own good, some unintended consequences, if you will, Rachel,

0:08:46.640 --> 0:08:49.800
<v Speaker 2>how do these drug discount programs like Medicaid or other

0:08:49.840 --> 0:08:52.240
<v Speaker 2>insurance programs impact this?

0:08:52.920 --> 0:08:55.480
<v Speaker 4>So I think, you know, what we've been discussing so

0:08:55.559 --> 0:08:59.080
<v Speaker 4>far is sort of the fundamental economics, and then there

0:08:59.120 --> 0:09:02.040
<v Speaker 4>are certain policies kind of exacerbate all this stuff, you know,

0:09:02.080 --> 0:09:04.520
<v Speaker 4>And so I think it would be a struggle to

0:09:04.559 --> 0:09:06.680
<v Speaker 4>say that, you know, all of this comes down to,

0:09:07.080 --> 0:09:10.839
<v Speaker 4>you know, the rapacious middle men. But I think that

0:09:11.280 --> 0:09:15.120
<v Speaker 4>as as you mentioned, there's Medicaid policies, the three forty

0:09:15.120 --> 0:09:17.760
<v Speaker 4>B discount program that sort of add another layer of

0:09:17.800 --> 0:09:21.959
<v Speaker 4>dysfunction on all this and all these sort of wacky economics.

0:09:22.600 --> 0:09:26.320
<v Speaker 4>And so, for example, in the Medicaid program, there's an

0:09:26.320 --> 0:09:29.720
<v Speaker 4>inflation penal of what I would call a penalty, I

0:09:29.720 --> 0:09:30.400
<v Speaker 4>guess they would call it.

0:09:30.840 --> 0:09:31.640
<v Speaker 2>Others would call it a.

0:09:31.559 --> 0:09:36.480
<v Speaker 4>Policy whereby if the price of the drug acceleers faster

0:09:36.559 --> 0:09:39.880
<v Speaker 4>than inflation, they get sort of an added discount they

0:09:39.880 --> 0:09:42.840
<v Speaker 4>have to rebate to pay a rebate back to Medicaid.

0:09:43.320 --> 0:09:46.280
<v Speaker 4>And so you might say, well, well, if prices are falling,

0:09:46.440 --> 0:09:48.760
<v Speaker 4>how would it be rising faster than inflation, Which is

0:09:48.760 --> 0:09:52.280
<v Speaker 4>the question I asked. And the explanation is, so if

0:09:52.320 --> 0:09:55.240
<v Speaker 4>you're thinking about a drug that is pennies, you know,

0:09:56.360 --> 0:09:59.080
<v Speaker 4>one penny can look like you know, change can look

0:09:59.120 --> 0:10:01.880
<v Speaker 4>like a big change. That's one problem. The other problem

0:10:01.920 --> 0:10:05.360
<v Speaker 4>is because of these contract terms that I discussed previously,

0:10:05.520 --> 0:10:09.600
<v Speaker 4>the you know, there's these buyers can drop out really quickly,

0:10:10.040 --> 0:10:13.280
<v Speaker 4>leaving manufacturers holding the bag. So there's a really brisk

0:10:13.400 --> 0:10:17.360
<v Speaker 4>rotation of buyers that come in come out, and that

0:10:17.400 --> 0:10:20.679
<v Speaker 4>creates a lot of variability in the prices depending on

0:10:20.720 --> 0:10:24.400
<v Speaker 4>the advocause. It's an average price. So when big, big,

0:10:24.440 --> 0:10:26.959
<v Speaker 4>big buyers are dropping in and out from quarter to quarter,

0:10:28.040 --> 0:10:30.959
<v Speaker 4>you know, there there the price that you're seeing may

0:10:31.200 --> 0:10:33.240
<v Speaker 4>made spike and then fall, and then spike and then

0:10:33.240 --> 0:10:35.240
<v Speaker 4>fall and if you're sort of penalized by an average,

0:10:35.360 --> 0:10:38.080
<v Speaker 4>it doesn't it's not really accurate. So you've got the

0:10:38.120 --> 0:10:40.080
<v Speaker 4>structure of these policies that are it was sort of

0:10:40.160 --> 0:10:44.200
<v Speaker 4>really designed for a branded drug market that has been

0:10:44.520 --> 0:10:48.760
<v Speaker 4>sort of applied, i would say, mistakenly to the generics market.

0:10:48.840 --> 0:10:51.960
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Opinion editor Rachel Rosenthal, and coming up, we're going

0:10:52.000 --> 0:10:55.120
<v Speaker 2>to take a look at a proposal to legalize marijuana

0:10:55.160 --> 0:10:58.440
<v Speaker 2>on the federal level and what that could mean politically

0:10:58.480 --> 0:11:01.840
<v Speaker 2>for the Biden administration. You're listening to Bloomberg Opinion.

0:11:13.800 --> 0:11:17.800
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Opinion podcast counts Saturdays at

0:11:17.800 --> 0:11:20.920
<v Speaker 1>one and seven pm Eastern on Bloomberg dot Com, the

0:11:21.000 --> 0:11:24.120
<v Speaker 1>iHeartRadio app, and the Bloomberg Business App, or listen on

0:11:24.200 --> 0:11:26.280
<v Speaker 1>demand wherever you get your podcasts.

0:11:28.160 --> 0:11:31.000
<v Speaker 2>You're listening to Bloomberg Opinion. I may Mee Morris. President

0:11:31.040 --> 0:11:34.040
<v Speaker 2>Biden may be looking to boost his reelection hopes and

0:11:34.160 --> 0:11:37.480
<v Speaker 2>his sinking poll numbers. And there's one policy position that

0:11:37.600 --> 0:11:41.160
<v Speaker 2>is popular with voters and could help unite Democrats. It

0:11:41.280 --> 0:11:45.760
<v Speaker 2>is legalizing recreational use of marijuana. Let's bring in Bloomberg

0:11:45.760 --> 0:11:49.679
<v Speaker 2>Opinion columnist Jonathan Bernstein, who covers politics, and Jonathan, you're

0:11:49.720 --> 0:11:54.440
<v Speaker 2>talking about in your column recreational marijuana not medicinal, which

0:11:54.520 --> 0:11:56.320
<v Speaker 2>kind of surprised me. How could this help?

0:11:57.200 --> 0:12:02.080
<v Speaker 5>Legalization right now is a very popular idea. Twenty four

0:12:02.160 --> 0:12:07.080
<v Speaker 5>states have now made recreational marijuana legal, and when you

0:12:07.160 --> 0:12:09.720
<v Speaker 5>do polls, there was a Gallup poll out this month

0:12:10.640 --> 0:12:17.079
<v Speaker 5>and it was around seventy percent support legalizing recreational marijuana.

0:12:17.200 --> 0:12:20.280
<v Speaker 5>So it's not a fringe position anymore. For those who

0:12:20.400 --> 0:12:22.960
<v Speaker 5>might be in states don't have this and you know,

0:12:23.080 --> 0:12:25.640
<v Speaker 5>may not realize, it's no longer a fringe position. It's

0:12:25.760 --> 0:12:31.040
<v Speaker 5>a mainstream, popular position. And the truth is that especially

0:12:31.040 --> 0:12:35.440
<v Speaker 5>among Democrats, but it's about fifty to fifty among Republicans.

0:12:35.600 --> 0:12:38.120
<v Speaker 5>And the truth is that Joe Biden has been behind

0:12:38.440 --> 0:12:40.800
<v Speaker 5>public opinion on this, and I think with good reason.

0:12:41.040 --> 0:12:42.880
<v Speaker 6>But I think it's also time now for him to

0:12:43.120 --> 0:12:44.440
<v Speaker 6>promptly switch now.

0:12:44.520 --> 0:12:46.200
<v Speaker 2>It seems like there would be a risk of some

0:12:46.400 --> 0:12:49.680
<v Speaker 2>division on this issue because it has already been handled

0:12:49.720 --> 0:12:53.640
<v Speaker 2>by those states that want to legalize it. Why bother

0:12:53.760 --> 0:12:55.439
<v Speaker 2>with something that could be this touchy.

0:12:56.400 --> 0:13:02.040
<v Speaker 5>It's seventy percent, so yes, they're thirty percent to oppose it,

0:13:02.440 --> 0:13:05.280
<v Speaker 5>but it's a popular position. Generally, you want popular positions.

0:13:05.320 --> 0:13:10.000
<v Speaker 5>On top of that, it's popular among Biden's in Biden's

0:13:10.040 --> 0:13:14.840
<v Speaker 5>party party, particularly popular among some of the strong Democratic

0:13:14.840 --> 0:13:17.840
<v Speaker 5>groups that he's had some problems with recently, young people,

0:13:18.040 --> 0:13:21.840
<v Speaker 5>black people, and those populations. I've been looking for to

0:13:21.880 --> 0:13:24.560
<v Speaker 5>have some signature thing that they feel like Biden's doing

0:13:24.600 --> 0:13:27.120
<v Speaker 5>for them because they don't feel like the economy's working

0:13:27.200 --> 0:13:31.160
<v Speaker 5>for them at other things. And you know, in politics,

0:13:31.200 --> 0:13:35.680
<v Speaker 5>it's always a good idea, you know, everything else aside

0:13:35.840 --> 0:13:39.079
<v Speaker 5>to find something that unites your party and splits the

0:13:39.120 --> 0:13:43.120
<v Speaker 5>other party. And that's something that legal marijuana does now.

0:13:44.600 --> 0:13:51.160
<v Speaker 5>So you know, up to this point where support was growing,

0:13:51.200 --> 0:13:54.080
<v Speaker 5>but it wasn't at this level, my feeling was that

0:13:54.080 --> 0:13:56.800
<v Speaker 5>there's no reason for Biden to get involved because as

0:13:56.840 --> 0:13:59.520
<v Speaker 5>long as public opinion is moving his way, all that

0:13:59.559 --> 0:14:02.920
<v Speaker 5>president involvement tends to do is polarize things. And so

0:14:03.320 --> 0:14:07.160
<v Speaker 5>instead of support growing among Republicans, which is what's been happening,

0:14:08.800 --> 0:14:11.920
<v Speaker 5>Republicans would tend to move against it if the president

0:14:11.960 --> 0:14:13.880
<v Speaker 5>was for it. But now it's sort of reached that

0:14:14.000 --> 0:14:17.600
<v Speaker 5>stage where it sort of doesn't matter anymore. It's so

0:14:17.720 --> 0:14:21.200
<v Speaker 5>overwhelmingly popular that it's unlikely. And the other thing that

0:14:21.280 --> 0:14:23.760
<v Speaker 5>I think it has going forward is that because it's

0:14:23.800 --> 0:14:27.160
<v Speaker 5>been in so many different states, you can see that

0:14:27.880 --> 0:14:32.280
<v Speaker 5>the policy as it rolls out doesn't generate backlash. It doesn't,

0:14:32.440 --> 0:14:36.680
<v Speaker 5>you know, people don't regret it. Especially there aren't any

0:14:36.680 --> 0:14:39.280
<v Speaker 5>states that have legalized and then said, oh my god,

0:14:39.320 --> 0:14:42.000
<v Speaker 5>this isn't working, we need to go back. Biden has

0:14:42.080 --> 0:14:46.680
<v Speaker 5>made some small moves to change it, but he hasn't

0:14:46.720 --> 0:14:49.640
<v Speaker 5>really sort of come out full scale, Yeah, we support this,

0:14:49.760 --> 0:14:51.640
<v Speaker 5>and it's probably time.

0:14:51.520 --> 0:14:54.440
<v Speaker 2>To do that now. Historically speaking, you compare this in

0:14:54.480 --> 0:14:57.440
<v Speaker 2>your column to the public push that then Vice President

0:14:57.480 --> 0:15:01.040
<v Speaker 2>Biden gave President Obama on the issue of me marriage equality.

0:15:01.040 --> 0:15:01.960
<v Speaker 2>How was this similar?

0:15:02.560 --> 0:15:05.720
<v Speaker 5>Well as an issue, it sort of had the similar

0:15:06.080 --> 0:15:08.320
<v Speaker 5>sense that it used to be very unpopular, it became

0:15:08.320 --> 0:15:11.480
<v Speaker 5>more popular, the president got behind the curve on it,

0:15:11.480 --> 0:15:14.600
<v Speaker 5>It became almost universally popular among Democrats and split the

0:15:14.640 --> 0:15:18.360
<v Speaker 5>other party, and then eventually Barack Obama got on board.

0:15:18.520 --> 0:15:21.960
<v Speaker 5>In fact, what I suggested in the column might be

0:15:22.040 --> 0:15:25.960
<v Speaker 5>a nice way of doing this is if the vice

0:15:26.000 --> 0:15:29.480
<v Speaker 5>president Vice President Harris was to simply answer the question

0:15:29.480 --> 0:15:32.280
<v Speaker 5>what should the administration policy be? Which is what happened

0:15:32.960 --> 0:15:38.800
<v Speaker 5>ten years ago to Biden gave a public push to Obama.

0:15:39.520 --> 0:15:44.600
<v Speaker 5>And at that point, given the Democratic Party was one

0:15:44.640 --> 0:15:48.440
<v Speaker 5>hundred percent favor of matter equality and Obama was way

0:15:48.440 --> 0:15:50.680
<v Speaker 5>behind the curve, Obama didn't have much choice but to

0:15:51.120 --> 0:15:54.320
<v Speaker 5>finally accept that that was where things were going, and

0:15:54.360 --> 0:15:57.760
<v Speaker 5>he made his own policy change. And so, you know,

0:15:57.800 --> 0:16:00.560
<v Speaker 5>Harris could do that at this point, could do it.

0:16:00.640 --> 0:16:03.560
<v Speaker 5>She could you know, say well, yeah, you know, yes,

0:16:03.680 --> 0:16:08.280
<v Speaker 5>I think we should legalize. And that might be a

0:16:08.360 --> 0:16:12.120
<v Speaker 5>way to push Biden, who would be flip flopping. Politicians

0:16:12.160 --> 0:16:14.000
<v Speaker 5>don't like to flip flop. That might be a way

0:16:14.000 --> 0:16:15.840
<v Speaker 5>to push him to do it. And it also might

0:16:16.440 --> 0:16:18.480
<v Speaker 5>help Harris a little bit to show that she has

0:16:18.520 --> 0:16:19.880
<v Speaker 5>some foubt within the administration.

0:16:20.160 --> 0:16:23.720
<v Speaker 2>Well, let's talk about that. The vice president's position on

0:16:23.800 --> 0:16:26.200
<v Speaker 2>marijuana is a complicated one anyway, Remember she has a

0:16:26.280 --> 0:16:29.400
<v Speaker 2>history as a prosecutor judicial reform, that sort of thing.

0:16:29.640 --> 0:16:32.760
<v Speaker 2>Would she be the voice that would come out, you.

0:16:32.680 --> 0:16:36.920
<v Speaker 5>Know, presumably she's in favor of Demographically these are Democrats, right,

0:16:36.960 --> 0:16:39.520
<v Speaker 5>So Democratic Party is again something like ninety percent in

0:16:39.600 --> 0:16:41.800
<v Speaker 5>favor of it. So my guess is that Harris in

0:16:41.880 --> 0:16:47.000
<v Speaker 5>her gut probably supports it, but forget about that. Politically,

0:16:48.240 --> 0:16:51.680
<v Speaker 5>if Harris wants to be president, she wants to take

0:16:51.720 --> 0:16:55.480
<v Speaker 5>the positions of the Democratic Party, and of course every

0:16:55.520 --> 0:16:58.400
<v Speaker 5>vice president eventually wants to be president. So you know,

0:16:58.680 --> 0:17:01.280
<v Speaker 5>I think that politically it's it's a smart place for

0:17:01.320 --> 0:17:05.520
<v Speaker 5>her to be. And you know, if somebody wants to

0:17:05.520 --> 0:17:08.000
<v Speaker 5>throw back to her, throw it back at her that

0:17:08.080 --> 0:17:11.840
<v Speaker 5>while she put people in jail years ago as a prosecutor,

0:17:12.160 --> 0:17:14.280
<v Speaker 5>that's a conversation she's going to have to have at

0:17:14.280 --> 0:17:15.720
<v Speaker 5>some point. She had it a little bit when she

0:17:15.800 --> 0:17:18.640
<v Speaker 5>ran for president. If she ever wants to run for president,

0:17:19.119 --> 0:17:21.080
<v Speaker 5>for the nomination, she's going to have to go through this.

0:17:21.240 --> 0:17:22.719
<v Speaker 5>So why not get ahead of it now?

0:17:23.080 --> 0:17:25.960
<v Speaker 2>And we are talking to Bloomberg opinion columnist Jonathan Bernstein,

0:17:25.960 --> 0:17:29.080
<v Speaker 2>who says a push to legalize recreational use of marijuana

0:17:29.320 --> 0:17:32.359
<v Speaker 2>that actually helped Democrats win the White House in twenty

0:17:32.400 --> 0:17:35.639
<v Speaker 2>twenty four. It also seems, though, Jonathan, that it might

0:17:35.680 --> 0:17:37.960
<v Speaker 2>be better to get a coherent message together with the

0:17:37.960 --> 0:17:41.400
<v Speaker 2>administration on the strength of the economy. We've been hearing

0:17:41.480 --> 0:17:45.200
<v Speaker 2>how the economic numbers are very good, people are spending more,

0:17:45.200 --> 0:17:49.040
<v Speaker 2>but consumer sentiment is just rock bottom and there's a

0:17:49.080 --> 0:17:55.440
<v Speaker 2>disconnect there. Maybe that should be like, that sounds something safer, right,

0:17:55.440 --> 0:17:57.359
<v Speaker 2>that sounds like a safer thing for them to tackle.

0:17:57.960 --> 0:17:58.760
<v Speaker 6>Well, there's no.

0:17:58.800 --> 0:18:01.640
<v Speaker 5>Question that is going to have to push the economy,

0:18:01.680 --> 0:18:04.280
<v Speaker 5>and if people do not change their minds about the

0:18:04.320 --> 0:18:07.400
<v Speaker 5>economy over the next year, he's in grave danger. Talking

0:18:07.480 --> 0:18:10.960
<v Speaker 5>on marijuana could generate some positives for a few days,

0:18:11.119 --> 0:18:14.920
<v Speaker 5>it might linger with some of the groups who care

0:18:14.920 --> 0:18:17.520
<v Speaker 5>about this the most. You know, this is one of

0:18:17.520 --> 0:18:20.240
<v Speaker 5>the great puzzles of US politicians right now, is where

0:18:20.400 --> 0:18:24.159
<v Speaker 5>what's the reason for the perception gap and will it

0:18:24.640 --> 0:18:25.840
<v Speaker 5>continue going forward?

0:18:26.600 --> 0:18:29.080
<v Speaker 6>And we could talk about that, but.

0:18:30.760 --> 0:18:34.359
<v Speaker 5>Yes, that's you know, whether that's a question of presidential

0:18:34.400 --> 0:18:39.560
<v Speaker 5>messaging or something about the economy or how things work,

0:18:39.600 --> 0:18:42.919
<v Speaker 5>and you know, generally it's a complicated topic.

0:18:43.359 --> 0:18:46.760
<v Speaker 2>Your column lays out a really good argument for the

0:18:46.800 --> 0:18:50.320
<v Speaker 2>administration to embrace this policy and move forward on it.

0:18:51.200 --> 0:18:54.159
<v Speaker 2>Do you feel like it's not likely to happen and why?

0:18:54.560 --> 0:18:57.240
<v Speaker 6>That's a good question. It wouldn't surprise me at all

0:18:57.280 --> 0:18:57.920
<v Speaker 6>if it happens.

0:18:58.200 --> 0:19:01.639
<v Speaker 5>I do think that it's something that you know, again,

0:19:02.400 --> 0:19:06.000
<v Speaker 5>this isn't a fringe thing anymore. This is Ohio, you know,

0:19:07.480 --> 0:19:13.520
<v Speaker 5>and other states that are lean Republican or are swing states.

0:19:14.320 --> 0:19:18.440
<v Speaker 5>It's a majority issue, and politicians they don't like flip lobbing.

0:19:18.600 --> 0:19:20.920
<v Speaker 5>They do like getting on the side of a popular issue.

0:19:21.080 --> 0:19:24.480
<v Speaker 5>So would it surprised me. It would not surprise me

0:19:24.520 --> 0:19:27.960
<v Speaker 5>a lot either way, because those are the sort of

0:19:28.000 --> 0:19:31.720
<v Speaker 5>two dynamics going going into it. I don't think that

0:19:31.760 --> 0:19:37.479
<v Speaker 5>they are afraid of taking a huge backlash, but it is,

0:19:37.640 --> 0:19:40.520
<v Speaker 5>you know, with things going on in the world and

0:19:40.560 --> 0:19:44.440
<v Speaker 5>with the economy, as you suggest, talking about something that's

0:19:44.520 --> 0:19:49.040
<v Speaker 5>not necessarily considered that important might not be where they

0:19:49.080 --> 0:19:51.399
<v Speaker 5>want to spend their time. Again, that's one of the

0:19:51.440 --> 0:19:53.080
<v Speaker 5>reasons why I thought it was sort of fun to

0:19:53.119 --> 0:19:57.080
<v Speaker 5>think about, Well, what if Harris forces the issue, because

0:19:57.080 --> 0:19:59.800
<v Speaker 5>if it really comes down to having to talk about it,

0:20:00.400 --> 0:20:02.400
<v Speaker 5>I don't think that Joe Biden wants to be there,

0:20:02.920 --> 0:20:06.200
<v Speaker 5>you know, defending a minority view within the party.

0:20:06.200 --> 0:20:08.520
<v Speaker 6>If it becomes something that people are talking about.

0:20:09.000 --> 0:20:10.680
<v Speaker 2>All right, Jonathan, we're going to leave it there. Thank

0:20:10.720 --> 0:20:11.960
<v Speaker 2>you so much for taking the time.

0:20:12.440 --> 0:20:12.800
<v Speaker 6>Thank you.

0:20:13.200 --> 0:20:16.720
<v Speaker 2>Jonathan Bernstein is a Bloomberg opinion columnist who covers politics

0:20:17.000 --> 0:20:20.280
<v Speaker 2>and coming up is that decongestin not quite working for you.

0:20:20.680 --> 0:20:23.600
<v Speaker 2>There's a reason. Don't forget. We're available as a podcast

0:20:23.640 --> 0:20:26.920
<v Speaker 2>on Apple, Spotify or your favorite podcast platform. This is

0:20:26.960 --> 0:20:27.840
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Opinion.

0:20:37.880 --> 0:20:41.720
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Opinion podcast. Catch us Saturdays

0:20:41.720 --> 0:20:44.879
<v Speaker 1>at one and seven pm Eastern on Bloomberg dot com,

0:20:44.920 --> 0:20:48.080
<v Speaker 1>the iHeartRadio app and the Bloomberg Business App, or listen

0:20:48.119 --> 0:20:50.360
<v Speaker 1>on demand wherever you get your podcasts.

0:20:52.480 --> 0:20:55.520
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg Opinion. I Amy Morrison. We are deep

0:20:55.560 --> 0:20:58.720
<v Speaker 2>into cold and flu season. You've probably already made at

0:20:58.800 --> 0:21:00.879
<v Speaker 2>least one trip to the farm to find relief. I

0:21:00.920 --> 0:21:04.040
<v Speaker 2>know I have, But buyer beware. Over the counter oral

0:21:04.080 --> 0:21:07.800
<v Speaker 2>decongestants are not all they're said to be. Bloomberg Opinion

0:21:07.840 --> 0:21:10.639
<v Speaker 2>columnist Faith Lamb cover Science and his host of the

0:21:10.760 --> 0:21:14.520
<v Speaker 2>Follow the Science podcast and joins us. Now let's start

0:21:14.840 --> 0:21:19.040
<v Speaker 2>fae with PE. We've seen those two letters on pharmacy shelves,

0:21:19.400 --> 0:21:22.640
<v Speaker 2>on different boxes and containers for quite a while. What

0:21:22.800 --> 0:21:23.280
<v Speaker 2>is PE.

0:21:24.440 --> 0:21:30.359
<v Speaker 7>It's something called phenol epron, and it's actually the dominant

0:21:31.200 --> 0:21:37.880
<v Speaker 7>drug for decongestants. It's the dominant ingredient and it came

0:21:37.920 --> 0:21:41.760
<v Speaker 7>to be dominant after several others were removed from the

0:21:41.800 --> 0:21:44.520
<v Speaker 7>market for different reasons once it actually worked pretty well.

0:21:45.119 --> 0:21:49.120
<v Speaker 7>The phenol epron has been in the news recently because

0:21:49.200 --> 0:21:53.760
<v Speaker 7>a couple of pharmacists did a deep investigation and found

0:21:53.760 --> 0:21:57.200
<v Speaker 7>that it really does not work.

0:21:58.280 --> 0:22:00.240
<v Speaker 2>And so they've all been pulled. Is that right?

0:22:02.000 --> 0:22:05.520
<v Speaker 7>They are working on that, I see, But at least

0:22:05.560 --> 0:22:10.240
<v Speaker 7>we it's been made public now that these drugs don't work.

0:22:10.600 --> 0:22:14.680
<v Speaker 7>The thing that I think was particularly deceptive is that

0:22:15.160 --> 0:22:19.040
<v Speaker 7>there's a there's a drug called sudafed pe, and there

0:22:19.280 --> 0:22:23.720
<v Speaker 7>was a sudafed actually did work really well, and then

0:22:23.880 --> 0:22:26.480
<v Speaker 7>it was taken off the market because if you remember

0:22:26.600 --> 0:22:29.760
<v Speaker 7>the series Breaking Bad, people were using it to make

0:22:29.880 --> 0:22:34.560
<v Speaker 7>crystal meth, and so it got it got actually got

0:22:34.760 --> 0:22:37.679
<v Speaker 7>taken off the shelves. But it is available if you

0:22:37.720 --> 0:22:39.920
<v Speaker 7>go to the pharmacist and ask for it. It's just

0:22:40.040 --> 0:22:43.560
<v Speaker 7>hidden away so that it would be harder for the

0:22:44.119 --> 0:22:48.520
<v Speaker 7>drug the illegal meth cooks to get it. But then

0:22:48.720 --> 0:22:52.919
<v Speaker 7>this suit of fed pe is actually a completely different drug.

0:22:53.600 --> 0:22:56.359
<v Speaker 7>It's not the same thing at all, and in fact

0:22:56.440 --> 0:22:58.880
<v Speaker 7>it it doesn't seem to work.

0:22:59.240 --> 0:23:02.360
<v Speaker 2>See. Okay, I'm glad you explained that. Because I take

0:23:02.760 --> 0:23:07.800
<v Speaker 2>zertech and sometimes Zirtec d D being a decongestant. I assumed,

0:23:08.480 --> 0:23:11.159
<v Speaker 2>and this is on me, that sudo fed pe was

0:23:11.200 --> 0:23:14.040
<v Speaker 2>just like an additive to classic sudo fed. What you're

0:23:14.040 --> 0:23:15.879
<v Speaker 2>saying is it's not even sudafed.

0:23:16.440 --> 0:23:18.879
<v Speaker 7>No, it's a completely different thing. If you want the

0:23:18.920 --> 0:23:22.040
<v Speaker 7>real Suita fed, you're supposed to ask the pharmacist. But

0:23:22.080 --> 0:23:24.879
<v Speaker 7>people just don't know that. You know, I've talked. I

0:23:24.920 --> 0:23:27.159
<v Speaker 7>talked to someone who was in the drug industry and

0:23:27.160 --> 0:23:28.600
<v Speaker 7>he said, well, you know, you can get the real

0:23:28.600 --> 0:23:32.680
<v Speaker 7>stuff if you just ask, but but people haven't. You know,

0:23:32.680 --> 0:23:35.920
<v Speaker 7>those two people call these sort of decoy medicines now

0:23:36.000 --> 0:23:39.320
<v Speaker 7>on the shelves. And you know, they had a good

0:23:39.359 --> 0:23:44.080
<v Speaker 7>reason for pulling the pseudofed from the shelves because there

0:23:44.240 --> 0:23:48.639
<v Speaker 7>was a problem with the manufacturer of this this dangerous

0:23:49.040 --> 0:23:52.440
<v Speaker 7>illegal drug. But the problem was then there was all

0:23:52.480 --> 0:23:55.000
<v Speaker 7>of this deceptive marketing so that people thought they were

0:23:55.040 --> 0:23:57.480
<v Speaker 7>getting the same thing when they were getting something that

0:23:58.240 --> 0:24:02.640
<v Speaker 7>was in fact grandfathered in. It just hadn't really been

0:24:02.720 --> 0:24:05.639
<v Speaker 7>thoroughly tested for efficacy because a lot of over the

0:24:05.640 --> 0:24:10.600
<v Speaker 7>counter drugs were already on the market before FDA started

0:24:12.560 --> 0:24:15.280
<v Speaker 7>requiring that things be tested for efficacy.

0:24:15.520 --> 0:24:17.480
<v Speaker 2>Wait say that again.

0:24:18.040 --> 0:24:21.640
<v Speaker 7>Oh yeah, So you know, and the battle days before

0:24:21.680 --> 0:24:24.280
<v Speaker 7>there was an FDA, you know, anybody could sell anything,

0:24:24.280 --> 0:24:29.280
<v Speaker 7>and people sold terrible toxic things. And the initial directive

0:24:29.320 --> 0:24:33.840
<v Speaker 7>of the FDA was to that drugs be safe, that

0:24:34.000 --> 0:24:38.320
<v Speaker 7>they not harm people. And then by the nineteen sixties,

0:24:39.520 --> 0:24:42.359
<v Speaker 7>FDA was also requiring efficacy. But there were a whole

0:24:42.920 --> 0:24:45.880
<v Speaker 7>slew of drugs already on the shelves that hadn't been

0:24:45.920 --> 0:24:49.639
<v Speaker 7>tested for efficacy, and so FDA had to deal with that,

0:24:49.720 --> 0:24:53.080
<v Speaker 7>and they dealt with that by sort of grouping drugs

0:24:53.119 --> 0:24:57.320
<v Speaker 7>into these categories and then they would try to determine

0:24:57.320 --> 0:25:02.600
<v Speaker 7>whether the categories were sort of generally effective, so they

0:25:02.640 --> 0:25:05.320
<v Speaker 7>didn't really go back and test every individual drug that's

0:25:05.359 --> 0:25:07.800
<v Speaker 7>on the shelves. So that's why some things on the

0:25:07.880 --> 0:25:10.560
<v Speaker 7>drug store shelves have been tested for efficacy if they're

0:25:10.640 --> 0:25:13.399
<v Speaker 7>relatively recent arrivals. But that there are a lot of

0:25:13.520 --> 0:25:18.800
<v Speaker 7>old drugs that we're grandfathered in and haven't been thoroughly tested.

0:25:19.880 --> 0:25:23.240
<v Speaker 2>So are there other drugs or products out there besides

0:25:23.760 --> 0:25:27.040
<v Speaker 2>pseudo fed and other decongestants that are being sold as

0:25:27.080 --> 0:25:28.840
<v Speaker 2>being effective but they're not not really?

0:25:29.840 --> 0:25:33.600
<v Speaker 7>Uh yeah, yeah, I think a lot of I talked

0:25:33.640 --> 0:25:38.639
<v Speaker 7>to the two pharmacists, pharmacy professors who really spearheaded the

0:25:38.640 --> 0:25:42.000
<v Speaker 7>effort to look into these decongestants, and they said, oh, yeah,

0:25:42.000 --> 0:25:44.000
<v Speaker 7>there are other things that have also been grandfathered in,

0:25:44.240 --> 0:25:47.560
<v Speaker 7>often things with fairly vague claims that I think they

0:25:47.600 --> 0:25:52.440
<v Speaker 7>mentioned some drugs for gastro intestinal problems and anything that's

0:25:52.600 --> 0:25:57.080
<v Speaker 7>marketed as homeopathic. Usually the claims are pretty vague. But

0:25:57.160 --> 0:26:00.719
<v Speaker 7>those none of those are actually approved by FDA for efficacy,

0:26:01.320 --> 0:26:05.120
<v Speaker 7>and supplements also are only very loosely regulated.

0:26:06.320 --> 0:26:09.160
<v Speaker 2>And we are talking with Bloomberg Opinion colonist Faith Lamb

0:26:09.160 --> 0:26:13.159
<v Speaker 2>about ineffective drugs on our pharmacy shelves, and you were

0:26:13.200 --> 0:26:16.200
<v Speaker 2>talking about the role that the FDA is playing and

0:26:16.240 --> 0:26:19.240
<v Speaker 2>how that role has evolved over the past few decades.

0:26:19.760 --> 0:26:22.879
<v Speaker 2>So what is the FDA doing now? Is it just

0:26:22.960 --> 0:26:25.680
<v Speaker 2>a matter of screening them. I know that there are

0:26:25.720 --> 0:26:27.400
<v Speaker 2>some that are going to remain on the shelves because

0:26:27.400 --> 0:26:30.320
<v Speaker 2>they've been grandfathered in, but that's not sustainable.

0:26:30.920 --> 0:26:36.480
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, No, I think that because these pharmacy professors, you know,

0:26:36.600 --> 0:26:39.879
<v Speaker 7>called attention to the fact that there were already a

0:26:39.960 --> 0:26:45.240
<v Speaker 7>number of studies that were really damning about these these

0:26:45.280 --> 0:26:48.920
<v Speaker 7>decongestions that have been dominating the market. That there were

0:26:48.960 --> 0:26:53.359
<v Speaker 7>some controlled trials where people took the real SUITO fed

0:26:53.600 --> 0:26:55.360
<v Speaker 7>and got a lot of relief, and they took these

0:26:55.400 --> 0:26:59.080
<v Speaker 7>drugs and it was no better than placebo. So, you know,

0:26:59.119 --> 0:27:00.840
<v Speaker 7>it may take a while, but I think these are

0:27:00.880 --> 0:27:04.000
<v Speaker 7>going to eventually get pulled from the shelves, and the

0:27:05.040 --> 0:27:08.239
<v Speaker 7>CBS chain has already started getting rid of some of them.

0:27:08.359 --> 0:27:11.760
<v Speaker 7>So some of the pharmacies are are already kind of

0:27:11.760 --> 0:27:16.080
<v Speaker 7>trying to be ahead of the curve because the consumers

0:27:16.520 --> 0:27:20.800
<v Speaker 7>have now heard that these things don't work as advertised.

0:27:21.560 --> 0:27:25.840
<v Speaker 2>What did happen to the pseudoaphedrin or the phenol propanolamine?

0:27:25.840 --> 0:27:28.040
<v Speaker 2>We've heard all of the I mean I remember hearing

0:27:28.080 --> 0:27:30.399
<v Speaker 2>that growing up, that these are the two drugs that

0:27:30.480 --> 0:27:33.080
<v Speaker 2>you really need if you want to get some congestion

0:27:33.200 --> 0:27:35.760
<v Speaker 2>real relief. Where'd they go?

0:27:36.320 --> 0:27:36.520
<v Speaker 5>Well?

0:27:36.600 --> 0:27:41.119
<v Speaker 7>Right, So one of them was was and it was

0:27:41.240 --> 0:27:44.159
<v Speaker 7>also an ingredient in some weight loss drugs. There was

0:27:44.200 --> 0:27:49.520
<v Speaker 7>one called dexatrim. Yeah, they were in higher doses in

0:27:49.560 --> 0:27:53.080
<v Speaker 7>those drugs, but they those drugs were associated with stroke

0:27:53.240 --> 0:27:56.879
<v Speaker 7>and so even though there was no evidence that the

0:27:56.920 --> 0:28:00.439
<v Speaker 7>doses in the cold remedies would cause a stroke. Nobody

0:28:00.480 --> 0:28:03.080
<v Speaker 7>really wants to take a cold remedy that is even

0:28:03.680 --> 0:28:07.720
<v Speaker 7>you know, as any connection with stroke, So that I

0:28:07.760 --> 0:28:09.920
<v Speaker 7>think that was that was smart they got rid of that.

0:28:10.080 --> 0:28:15.320
<v Speaker 7>And then the sudofied was taken off the shelves and

0:28:15.400 --> 0:28:17.760
<v Speaker 7>people can still get it if they ask the pharmacist

0:28:17.960 --> 0:28:20.520
<v Speaker 7>for it, but there was a certain amount of red

0:28:20.560 --> 0:28:22.720
<v Speaker 7>tape you have to go through to get it because

0:28:22.760 --> 0:28:25.280
<v Speaker 7>it was it was taken off the shelves because of

0:28:25.400 --> 0:28:31.280
<v Speaker 7>the its use in making illegal crystal meth. Right that

0:28:31.400 --> 0:28:33.960
<v Speaker 7>was in the early episodes of Breaking Bad. You know,

0:28:34.040 --> 0:28:35.840
<v Speaker 7>they would go to these pharmacies and try to get

0:28:35.840 --> 0:28:40.600
<v Speaker 7>sudofed and so that had they had to do something

0:28:40.600 --> 0:28:44.320
<v Speaker 7>to keep the the meth cooks from getting it. So

0:28:45.080 --> 0:28:47.080
<v Speaker 7>you don't only have to ask the pharmacist for it,

0:28:47.120 --> 0:28:50.080
<v Speaker 7>but you have to register and put your name in

0:28:50.320 --> 0:28:53.560
<v Speaker 7>just so that there can be some tracking so that

0:28:54.240 --> 0:28:57.720
<v Speaker 7>you're not getting you know, different boxes from different pharmacies

0:28:57.800 --> 0:29:01.000
<v Speaker 7>and building up collection to cook your crystal meth. But

0:29:01.080 --> 0:29:04.680
<v Speaker 7>you can, you can get it, It's just I think

0:29:04.680 --> 0:29:08.480
<v Speaker 7>most consumers don't know that. And because the sudafed pe

0:29:08.720 --> 0:29:11.760
<v Speaker 7>looks so much and sounds so much like the old

0:29:12.160 --> 0:29:15.240
<v Speaker 7>drug that people assume it's going to be the same thing,

0:29:15.280 --> 0:29:17.120
<v Speaker 7>and it's not so.

0:29:17.240 --> 0:29:20.080
<v Speaker 2>Now that we are well into the cold and flu

0:29:20.160 --> 0:29:24.720
<v Speaker 2>season and people sound congested and are congested and are

0:29:24.880 --> 0:29:30.360
<v Speaker 2>dealing with head colds. Present company accepted, how is that

0:29:30.440 --> 0:29:32.120
<v Speaker 2>the way we have to get relief? We actually have

0:29:32.160 --> 0:29:35.200
<v Speaker 2>to go to the pharmacist and say, hey, I'm help

0:29:35.280 --> 0:29:35.760
<v Speaker 2>me out here.

0:29:36.440 --> 0:29:38.760
<v Speaker 7>You know, I think it's actually a good idea, because

0:29:38.960 --> 0:29:41.320
<v Speaker 7>you know, I talked to these two pharmacy professors. They

0:29:41.320 --> 0:29:43.080
<v Speaker 7>were great, and they said, you know, that's what we're

0:29:43.120 --> 0:29:45.760
<v Speaker 7>here for. We may look like we're busy and where

0:29:45.760 --> 0:29:49.280
<v Speaker 7>we're stressed, but our job is to help people navigate

0:29:49.320 --> 0:29:52.720
<v Speaker 7>what's on the shelves and that people should not hesitate

0:29:53.200 --> 0:29:56.440
<v Speaker 7>when they're not feeling well to ask the pharmacist to

0:29:56.560 --> 0:30:00.880
<v Speaker 7>recommend something. And if you're really congested and miserable, then

0:30:01.080 --> 0:30:04.280
<v Speaker 7>getting the drug that's behind the counter might be the

0:30:04.360 --> 0:30:07.560
<v Speaker 7>right answer, or it might be just to rest it out,

0:30:07.760 --> 0:30:10.280
<v Speaker 7>you know, but I think people would rather not take

0:30:10.320 --> 0:30:12.520
<v Speaker 7>a drug that's not going to help them.

0:30:13.240 --> 0:30:16.280
<v Speaker 2>That is terrific stuff. Thank you for doing all of that. Legwork. Fay,

0:30:16.360 --> 0:30:17.200
<v Speaker 2>we appreciate it.

0:30:17.680 --> 0:30:18.720
<v Speaker 5>Thank you.

0:30:18.720 --> 0:30:21.760
<v Speaker 2>You're listening to Bloomberg Opinion. I'm Amy Morris. The COVID

0:30:21.800 --> 0:30:25.280
<v Speaker 2>pandemic may be over. The impact lingers not just when

0:30:25.480 --> 0:30:28.400
<v Speaker 2>and where to wear masks, are scheduling your booster shots,

0:30:28.400 --> 0:30:31.959
<v Speaker 2>but the universal stress that we are all collectively feeling.

0:30:32.200 --> 0:30:35.880
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Opinion columnist Lisa Jarvis covers biotech, healthcare, and the

0:30:35.880 --> 0:30:39.640
<v Speaker 2>pharmaceutical industry, and she joins us. Now, Lisa, talk to

0:30:39.880 --> 0:30:43.280
<v Speaker 2>us about the level of stress. How intense is this

0:30:43.840 --> 0:30:44.880
<v Speaker 2>If we look.

0:30:44.720 --> 0:30:49.040
<v Speaker 8>At it as the general average level of stress we're feeling,

0:30:49.200 --> 0:30:52.720
<v Speaker 8>that hasn't necessarily changed over time. But what has changed

0:30:52.880 --> 0:30:56.800
<v Speaker 8>is that a growing proportion of Americans are feeling the

0:30:56.960 --> 0:31:01.160
<v Speaker 8>highest level of stress. The American Psychological Association does a

0:31:01.200 --> 0:31:03.360
<v Speaker 8>survey every year. It sounds kind of silly, but it's

0:31:03.400 --> 0:31:06.800
<v Speaker 8>a stress survey to gauge where we're all at. And

0:31:06.840 --> 0:31:10.120
<v Speaker 8>they found at this point, twenty four percent of adults,

0:31:10.120 --> 0:31:13.480
<v Speaker 8>so nearly a quarter of us, are rating their stress

0:31:13.560 --> 0:31:16.640
<v Speaker 8>at an eight or higher out of ten, so eight,

0:31:16.760 --> 0:31:20.000
<v Speaker 8>nine or ten out of ten, and that's increasing. You know,

0:31:20.160 --> 0:31:23.320
<v Speaker 8>obviously we've all gone through the pandemic, but there's just

0:31:23.360 --> 0:31:27.360
<v Speaker 8>been this relentless kind of pressure that at some point

0:31:27.360 --> 0:31:30.000
<v Speaker 8>we run out of resources to deal with it. And

0:31:30.040 --> 0:31:31.960
<v Speaker 8>I think we're seeing that in the data.

0:31:32.000 --> 0:31:34.200
<v Speaker 2>But where is this coming from. I thought the pandemic

0:31:34.280 --> 0:31:36.760
<v Speaker 2>was pretty much over well, I think not for.

0:31:36.760 --> 0:31:39.719
<v Speaker 8>Everyone, but I think it's parents. A lot of parents

0:31:39.720 --> 0:31:42.000
<v Speaker 8>are continuing to feel a lot of stress, but a

0:31:42.040 --> 0:31:44.600
<v Speaker 8>lot of people are citing the economy as a source

0:31:44.640 --> 0:31:48.160
<v Speaker 8>of their stress. I think seventy percent cited the economy

0:31:48.320 --> 0:31:51.240
<v Speaker 8>as really being one of the reasons that they're feeling

0:31:51.280 --> 0:31:54.320
<v Speaker 8>a lot of pressure these days. And that's significantly higher

0:31:54.360 --> 0:31:57.320
<v Speaker 8>than pre pandemic. And it's just kind of layering on

0:31:57.440 --> 0:32:01.440
<v Speaker 8>top again. You know, you have a period of relentless

0:32:01.680 --> 0:32:06.160
<v Speaker 8>kind of fear, uncertainty, social, social isolation, and it's hard.

0:32:06.680 --> 0:32:10.120
<v Speaker 8>You know, at this point, we're not just coming out

0:32:10.120 --> 0:32:12.440
<v Speaker 8>of that from our base point. We need to get

0:32:12.480 --> 0:32:14.280
<v Speaker 8>back up to our base point of where we are

0:32:14.280 --> 0:32:15.240
<v Speaker 8>managing our stress.

0:32:15.680 --> 0:32:18.800
<v Speaker 2>Is it worse for kids or the elderly who's feeling this?

0:32:19.520 --> 0:32:23.080
<v Speaker 8>You know what's interesting is it to really younger adults,

0:32:23.120 --> 0:32:26.280
<v Speaker 8>people in the eighteen to forty four range, And so,

0:32:26.480 --> 0:32:28.560
<v Speaker 8>you know, on some levels, I asked the folks who

0:32:28.640 --> 0:32:30.800
<v Speaker 8>ran the surveytion. I think of it as there's just

0:32:30.840 --> 0:32:33.600
<v Speaker 8>more awareness and so people are feeling more open about

0:32:33.640 --> 0:32:37.480
<v Speaker 8>talking about it, and I think their feeling was you know, yes,

0:32:37.640 --> 0:32:39.400
<v Speaker 8>that's part of it, but it's not all of it.

0:32:39.720 --> 0:32:42.560
<v Speaker 8>And I think it's a combination again of parents just

0:32:42.600 --> 0:32:45.680
<v Speaker 8>not when it comes to that population having the time

0:32:45.760 --> 0:32:49.360
<v Speaker 8>to ever get back to their baseline pre pandemic, and

0:32:49.400 --> 0:32:52.960
<v Speaker 8>then now feeling other you know, kind of layers of

0:32:53.000 --> 0:32:54.640
<v Speaker 8>stress that are adding on top of that.

0:32:55.360 --> 0:32:59.440
<v Speaker 2>And that's why the stress didn't abate as the pandemic receded,

0:32:59.480 --> 0:33:03.360
<v Speaker 2>because their feeling stresses from other areas and their nerves

0:33:03.360 --> 0:33:05.800
<v Speaker 2>are already kind of raw from the pandemic. Is that

0:33:05.840 --> 0:33:08.200
<v Speaker 2>what I'm interpreting, Yeah.

0:33:07.960 --> 0:33:09.080
<v Speaker 8>That's exactly it.

0:33:09.160 --> 0:33:12.280
<v Speaker 9>There's just kind of this you know, I think if

0:33:12.320 --> 0:33:16.360
<v Speaker 9>you think about the amount of resources we have to

0:33:16.440 --> 0:33:19.280
<v Speaker 9>deal with, you know, kind of what life is throwing

0:33:19.320 --> 0:33:23.000
<v Speaker 9>at us. It's finite, and some of us naturally have

0:33:23.120 --> 0:33:26.080
<v Speaker 9>more than others too, and so when those get depleted,

0:33:26.640 --> 0:33:27.840
<v Speaker 9>it can be hard.

0:33:27.760 --> 0:33:30.400
<v Speaker 8>To get back to that base level. And then you know,

0:33:30.440 --> 0:33:32.720
<v Speaker 8>when you add more stress on top of that, we

0:33:32.880 --> 0:33:37.440
<v Speaker 8>know that kind of chronic pressure really makes it hard

0:33:37.520 --> 0:33:41.280
<v Speaker 8>to recover back to that base level. So that seems

0:33:41.320 --> 0:33:45.080
<v Speaker 8>to be what's going on. People are just continuing to struggle, So.

0:33:45.080 --> 0:33:47.360
<v Speaker 2>What's the solution. Is there any guidance for us?

0:33:48.920 --> 0:33:53.920
<v Speaker 8>It sounds so squishy, but some of it. One psychologist

0:33:54.000 --> 0:33:56.320
<v Speaker 8>I talked to I really kind of liked this was

0:33:56.720 --> 0:34:00.960
<v Speaker 8>to have someone stop. She asked her her patients to

0:34:01.040 --> 0:34:04.000
<v Speaker 8>stop and do like a self assessment and ask themselves,

0:34:04.040 --> 0:34:07.600
<v Speaker 8>where's the fire? You know, is there something really immediately

0:34:07.920 --> 0:34:11.400
<v Speaker 8>stressful going on that is an emergency? If not, like

0:34:11.640 --> 0:34:13.640
<v Speaker 8>take a breath and try to take things down a

0:34:13.680 --> 0:34:16.640
<v Speaker 8>notch and like ground yourself. I think some other advice,

0:34:16.680 --> 0:34:18.560
<v Speaker 8>because some of it has to come with just everything

0:34:18.560 --> 0:34:21.960
<v Speaker 8>we're seeing in the news. Turn off and sometimes the

0:34:22.000 --> 0:34:23.920
<v Speaker 8>news if it's too much, Get what you need to

0:34:23.960 --> 0:34:26.840
<v Speaker 8>know for your to make decisions for yourself and your family,

0:34:27.120 --> 0:34:28.960
<v Speaker 8>and then just try to get out of some of

0:34:29.000 --> 0:34:32.960
<v Speaker 8>your maybe social isolation that ruts we all got into

0:34:33.040 --> 0:34:33.840
<v Speaker 8>during the pandemic.

0:34:33.880 --> 0:34:37.640
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Opinion columnist Lisa Jarvis covers biotech, healthcare, and the

0:34:37.640 --> 0:34:41.120
<v Speaker 2>pharmaceutical industry and that does it. For this week's Bloomberg Opinion.

0:34:41.200 --> 0:34:43.320
<v Speaker 2>We are produced by Eric Molow, and you can find

0:34:43.400 --> 0:34:46.080
<v Speaker 2>all of these columns on the Bloomberg terminal. We're also

0:34:46.120 --> 0:34:49.560
<v Speaker 2>available as a podcast on Apple, Spotify, or your favorite

0:34:49.560 --> 0:34:53.160
<v Speaker 2>podcast platform. Stay with us. Today's top stories and global

0:34:53.200 --> 0:34:56.439
<v Speaker 2>business headlines are just ahead. I maybe Morris send. This

0:34:56.719 --> 0:35:02.080
<v Speaker 2>is Bloomberg.