1 00:00:05,120 --> 00:00:09,200 Speaker 1: Welcome to the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. I'm Tom Keane, along 2 00:00:09,200 --> 00:00:13,200 Speaker 1: with Jonathan Ferrell and Lisa Brownowitz. Daily we bring you 3 00:00:13,280 --> 00:00:18,600 Speaker 1: insight from the best and economics, finance, investment, and international relations. 4 00:00:18,960 --> 00:00:23,799 Speaker 1: Find Bloomberg Surveillance on Apple, podcast, SoundCloud, Bloomberg dot Com, 5 00:00:23,920 --> 00:00:29,760 Speaker 1: and of course on the Bloomberg terminal. Why have we 6 00:00:29,840 --> 00:00:32,440 Speaker 1: not seen more fallout, especially in such a jderary market, Peter. 7 00:00:32,479 --> 00:00:34,519 Speaker 1: She has been writing a lot about that head of 8 00:00:34,520 --> 00:00:37,120 Speaker 1: macro strategy at Academy Securities, and we're so glad you're 9 00:00:37,120 --> 00:00:39,680 Speaker 1: actually in studio with us, which is fabulous. It is 10 00:00:39,720 --> 00:00:42,440 Speaker 1: wonderful to have you on this pre Thanksgiving week, Peter. 11 00:00:42,560 --> 00:00:46,000 Speaker 1: How much are you seeing, uh, some sort of I 12 00:00:46,000 --> 00:00:48,240 Speaker 1: don't know, whales, and how much you're seeing something where 13 00:00:48,240 --> 00:00:52,200 Speaker 1: it's a realistic pricing action of institutions having fully adopted 14 00:00:52,760 --> 00:00:54,960 Speaker 1: a crypto asset, even if it does lose favor to 15 00:00:55,000 --> 00:00:56,960 Speaker 1: some degree. I think we have one more big leg 16 00:00:56,960 --> 00:00:58,360 Speaker 1: down in crypto. I think we're going to see some 17 00:00:58,440 --> 00:01:00,440 Speaker 1: selling off in bitcoin. I think of the things that 18 00:01:00,520 --> 00:01:03,080 Speaker 1: supported it recently are the fact that there are a 19 00:01:03,080 --> 00:01:05,280 Speaker 1: lot of whales who have invested interest in keeping it 20 00:01:05,360 --> 00:01:08,080 Speaker 1: higher and there's all this talk about bitcoin maximalist, right, 21 00:01:08,080 --> 00:01:10,800 Speaker 1: so there is a theory that okay, ft T the 22 00:01:10,880 --> 00:01:12,800 Speaker 1: tokens that was where a lot of the trouble was 23 00:01:13,040 --> 00:01:15,600 Speaker 1: maybe bitcoins, the quote unquote safe part of crypto. I 24 00:01:15,600 --> 00:01:17,680 Speaker 1: think that narrative is going to get hurt a little bit. 25 00:01:18,120 --> 00:01:19,600 Speaker 1: Um and all the stuff that's been going on with 26 00:01:19,640 --> 00:01:23,160 Speaker 1: a great scale trust so GBTC has been feeding into 27 00:01:23,160 --> 00:01:25,000 Speaker 1: that a little bit. So people I believe have been 28 00:01:25,040 --> 00:01:26,840 Speaker 1: selling that to buy bitcoin. I think that's going to 29 00:01:26,880 --> 00:01:28,640 Speaker 1: turn out to be a mistake as well. Why isn't 30 00:01:28,680 --> 00:01:31,000 Speaker 1: this a broader market story? How can this be so 31 00:01:31,040 --> 00:01:34,440 Speaker 1: contained given that this story really grew up in the 32 00:01:34,560 --> 00:01:39,000 Speaker 1: era of free money. So I think earlier this year 33 00:01:39,160 --> 00:01:40,960 Speaker 1: it's a great question, but I think earlier this year 34 00:01:41,640 --> 00:01:43,760 Speaker 1: they were kind of tied together because you had a 35 00:01:43,800 --> 00:01:46,440 Speaker 1: lot of people who are invested in crypto, they're invested 36 00:01:46,480 --> 00:01:49,600 Speaker 1: in disruptive stocks. They all were doing it on margins, 37 00:01:49,640 --> 00:01:52,040 Speaker 1: so every time one sneeze it would, you know, drag 38 00:01:52,160 --> 00:01:54,480 Speaker 1: down everything else that got shaken out a little bit. 39 00:01:54,520 --> 00:01:56,960 Speaker 1: So we're better off right now. I think the next 40 00:01:57,040 --> 00:01:58,920 Speaker 1: leg of this is going to be, Wow, what happens 41 00:01:58,960 --> 00:02:00,520 Speaker 1: to the economy. You start looking at the amount of 42 00:02:00,560 --> 00:02:03,560 Speaker 1: money that was being spent by even FTX on advertising 43 00:02:03,920 --> 00:02:06,000 Speaker 1: crypto as a whole. Right, I think this is going 44 00:02:06,040 --> 00:02:07,880 Speaker 1: to feed into the economy. I think the wealth effect 45 00:02:07,960 --> 00:02:11,320 Speaker 1: is real. Right this time we've lost three trillion dollars 46 00:02:11,360 --> 00:02:13,480 Speaker 1: down to just under a trillion, Right, there's been huge 47 00:02:13,520 --> 00:02:15,359 Speaker 1: wealth effects. I think this is going to bleed into 48 00:02:15,320 --> 00:02:17,400 Speaker 1: the economy. Generally, that's gonna be bad. I think it's 49 00:02:17,400 --> 00:02:19,640 Speaker 1: going to turn out to be good for energy usage though, Peter, 50 00:02:19,720 --> 00:02:22,600 Speaker 1: thanks so much for coming in. You have an August firm, 51 00:02:23,120 --> 00:02:27,360 Speaker 1: hugely conservative Academy and security as a former Adimals and 52 00:02:27,800 --> 00:02:30,040 Speaker 1: the like as well. They hang on every bit of 53 00:02:30,040 --> 00:02:35,480 Speaker 1: when Sheer publishes on rates risk and Taylor Swift, how 54 00:02:35,600 --> 00:02:38,400 Speaker 1: that sell? You know, we got to do some clickbait too, 55 00:02:38,400 --> 00:02:40,839 Speaker 1: even in our bid, because well, why do we sell 56 00:02:40,919 --> 00:02:44,120 Speaker 1: bitcoin to a conservative shop like Academy. These people are 57 00:02:44,160 --> 00:02:47,720 Speaker 1: gonna say it's unregulated, it can't be regulated, it's foreign. 58 00:02:47,919 --> 00:02:50,959 Speaker 1: How do you sell bitcoin is a legit thing to 59 00:02:51,080 --> 00:02:54,040 Speaker 1: a bunch of conservative people Academy. So unfortunately I've been 60 00:02:54,000 --> 00:02:55,720 Speaker 1: fairly negative on it. But I think we're having these 61 00:02:55,720 --> 00:02:57,720 Speaker 1: conversations where do we step in, When does it get 62 00:02:57,760 --> 00:02:59,920 Speaker 1: interesting for our firm to explore it. It's really gonna 63 00:03:00,120 --> 00:03:02,600 Speaker 1: down to regulation. Do the regulators come out and create 64 00:03:02,600 --> 00:03:05,000 Speaker 1: an environment that you can feel comfortable with? Right and 65 00:03:05,080 --> 00:03:07,079 Speaker 1: right now? It's just not there. One of my big 66 00:03:07,120 --> 00:03:09,360 Speaker 1: takeaways has been for the last year, you talk something 67 00:03:09,440 --> 00:03:13,960 Speaker 1: as simple as where something domiciled? And where are you 68 00:03:14,040 --> 00:03:15,800 Speaker 1: and I are in the same page on this? Ali 69 00:03:15,840 --> 00:03:18,720 Speaker 1: Baba is hanging out the Cayman Islands trying to play 70 00:03:18,760 --> 00:03:22,080 Speaker 1: by a different rule book. I'm gonna defend Gary Gunsler 71 00:03:22,160 --> 00:03:27,040 Speaker 1: here right now? What does he regulate? Where's the domicile? 72 00:03:27,760 --> 00:03:29,799 Speaker 1: I think that's really the key issue, right You've got 73 00:03:29,800 --> 00:03:31,320 Speaker 1: to have some sort of domicile here. And the big 74 00:03:31,360 --> 00:03:32,960 Speaker 1: question I think a lot of people are talking about, 75 00:03:32,960 --> 00:03:35,880 Speaker 1: even whether it's these gray sale trust is where is 76 00:03:35,920 --> 00:03:39,120 Speaker 1: the bitcoins? We talk about spotty tfs blah blah blah. Right, 77 00:03:39,160 --> 00:03:41,720 Speaker 1: It's like, how do you confirm on a daily basis 78 00:03:41,760 --> 00:03:43,920 Speaker 1: that what you think you hold in the crypto world 79 00:03:44,160 --> 00:03:48,600 Speaker 1: is legitimately there without maybe publishing it and exposing yourself 80 00:03:48,640 --> 00:03:50,720 Speaker 1: to thefter hacking. So I think that's really the key 81 00:03:50,840 --> 00:03:53,200 Speaker 1: is most other assets you understand whether you own it, 82 00:03:53,240 --> 00:03:55,200 Speaker 1: whether it's an equity, whether it's gold, you can pretty 83 00:03:55,200 --> 00:03:57,880 Speaker 1: easily prove it. That's been the hard part with crypto. 84 00:03:57,920 --> 00:03:59,280 Speaker 1: I think that's what's going to have to get to 85 00:03:59,280 --> 00:04:02,160 Speaker 1: the heart of regulation is how do we verify this? 86 00:04:02,240 --> 00:04:04,480 Speaker 1: How do we get comfortable that we are auditing something 87 00:04:04,760 --> 00:04:08,440 Speaker 1: and regulating something that's actually there. Neil Kashkari has been 88 00:04:08,440 --> 00:04:11,040 Speaker 1: talking about how this is just a ponzi scheme. He 89 00:04:11,040 --> 00:04:13,520 Speaker 1: doesn't really think that there's any they're they're here, and 90 00:04:13,560 --> 00:04:17,320 Speaker 1: he's been very vocal about that on Twitter and in lecturers. 91 00:04:17,440 --> 00:04:22,080 Speaker 1: How much is the banking industry leveraged to the bitcoin 92 00:04:22,200 --> 00:04:24,640 Speaker 1: and and and frankly to the crypto story, not necessarily 93 00:04:24,960 --> 00:04:28,440 Speaker 1: by borrowing money to invest in crypto, but in building 94 00:04:28,520 --> 00:04:31,640 Speaker 1: up teams of people designed to trade it, designed to 95 00:04:31,680 --> 00:04:33,760 Speaker 1: invest in I don't think the banks have really put 96 00:04:33,800 --> 00:04:35,600 Speaker 1: that much effort into it. I think they're building out, 97 00:04:35,600 --> 00:04:37,800 Speaker 1: but it's a small part of their business. The other 98 00:04:37,839 --> 00:04:39,559 Speaker 1: part of this I do think people made a mistake 99 00:04:39,640 --> 00:04:42,360 Speaker 1: is every time some bank announced they were doing something 100 00:04:42,360 --> 00:04:45,040 Speaker 1: on crypto, everyone right, oh, this is great, they're adopting. 101 00:04:45,040 --> 00:04:46,880 Speaker 1: If they're adopting, no, no, banks are very smart right. 102 00:04:46,920 --> 00:04:48,320 Speaker 1: If there's a bit offered to be made, if there's 103 00:04:48,320 --> 00:04:50,760 Speaker 1: some trading revenue be made, they're going to get involved. 104 00:04:50,760 --> 00:04:53,040 Speaker 1: That's not a commitment to it. So I think banks 105 00:04:53,040 --> 00:04:54,919 Speaker 1: can pull back if this doesn't work out. And to me, 106 00:04:55,160 --> 00:04:57,840 Speaker 1: bitcoin is always about adoption, the rate of adoption. When 107 00:04:57,880 --> 00:04:59,560 Speaker 1: you want to get bullish on it, you see adoption 108 00:04:59,600 --> 00:05:01,960 Speaker 1: coming up. I just don't see it going up anytime soon. 109 00:05:02,000 --> 00:05:03,600 Speaker 1: In fact, I see it dropping is more and more 110 00:05:03,640 --> 00:05:05,800 Speaker 1: people question why they want to be in this space. 111 00:05:05,960 --> 00:05:08,200 Speaker 1: What's your call for two thousand three, Let's get out 112 00:05:08,200 --> 00:05:11,880 Speaker 1: in front of your year ahead report? Uh, Taylor swift 113 00:05:11,880 --> 00:05:14,239 Speaker 1: into it? I'm not sure about that. I think crypto 114 00:05:14,720 --> 00:05:18,040 Speaker 1: going down will be subten thousand on bitcoin calling subten 115 00:05:18,040 --> 00:05:21,159 Speaker 1: thou definitely. I think that actually potentially happens even this year. 116 00:05:21,440 --> 00:05:23,599 Speaker 1: I like rates, though, I think yields are actually probably 117 00:05:23,600 --> 00:05:25,920 Speaker 1: the easiest trade. I want to be long yields right now. 118 00:05:26,200 --> 00:05:28,240 Speaker 1: I think treasuries are going to rally. I think the 119 00:05:28,279 --> 00:05:31,400 Speaker 1: economy is rolling over, the data is rolling over, and 120 00:05:31,440 --> 00:05:33,640 Speaker 1: as Hockey says, the Fed wants to talk, the markets 121 00:05:33,680 --> 00:05:35,240 Speaker 1: are starting not to listen to it. So I love 122 00:05:35,440 --> 00:05:37,400 Speaker 1: owning bonds here well, but we were talking to Carl 123 00:05:37,440 --> 00:05:41,239 Speaker 1: Weinberg earlier and he says, quantitative tightening. What about quantitative tightening? 124 00:05:41,640 --> 00:05:43,480 Speaker 1: So to me, quantitative tightening is a little bit the 125 00:05:43,520 --> 00:05:46,760 Speaker 1: opposite of quantitative easing, in fact, almost exact opposite, and 126 00:05:46,800 --> 00:05:49,840 Speaker 1: I find quantitative easing easier to explain. It's like if 127 00:05:49,920 --> 00:05:51,680 Speaker 1: you have these Newton cradle right where you drop this 128 00:05:51,680 --> 00:05:53,600 Speaker 1: one ball and stuff shoots out at the end. So 129 00:05:53,760 --> 00:05:56,679 Speaker 1: that's what happened. It shoots out and where it really 130 00:05:56,720 --> 00:05:59,400 Speaker 1: exposed itself at the riskiest end of the spectrum, right, 131 00:05:59,440 --> 00:06:01,760 Speaker 1: So everything the person winds up having to make a choice. 132 00:06:02,080 --> 00:06:04,920 Speaker 1: I have to either buy longer duration assets, riskier assets, 133 00:06:04,960 --> 00:06:07,240 Speaker 1: less liquid assets, and it really comes out at the 134 00:06:07,240 --> 00:06:08,840 Speaker 1: far end. That's why I think crypto did so well, 135 00:06:08,880 --> 00:06:10,960 Speaker 1: all these disruptive stocks. So when it comes back in, 136 00:06:11,000 --> 00:06:12,920 Speaker 1: it's not going to express itself in yields. It's going 137 00:06:12,960 --> 00:06:14,960 Speaker 1: to be in the riskiest assets. I think stocks can 138 00:06:15,000 --> 00:06:17,320 Speaker 1: still lag from here and it's not going to express 139 00:06:17,320 --> 00:06:19,680 Speaker 1: itself regardless of what we're doing on the quantitative tightening 140 00:06:19,680 --> 00:06:25,000 Speaker 1: and the bond markets up yield down. Stocks don't play no, 141 00:06:25,160 --> 00:06:27,000 Speaker 1: I think not. I think maybe we get a little 142 00:06:27,040 --> 00:06:30,919 Speaker 1: surge in stocks um after we get through this cryptodebacco 143 00:06:31,000 --> 00:06:33,320 Speaker 1: where people get back to comfortable. Oh, lower yields is 144 00:06:33,360 --> 00:06:35,080 Speaker 1: good for stocks, then I think the reality is gonna 145 00:06:35,080 --> 00:06:37,000 Speaker 1: be no, No, yields are going lower because the economy 146 00:06:37,000 --> 00:06:39,360 Speaker 1: has rolled over. We've done too much. We have these problems, 147 00:06:39,640 --> 00:06:42,479 Speaker 1: and quantitative tightening I think is more impactful on equities 148 00:06:42,520 --> 00:06:44,880 Speaker 1: and risk assets than spawns. I mean, never more came 149 00:06:44,920 --> 00:06:47,360 Speaker 1: out Taylor Swift with Jack getting off in the National. 150 00:06:47,440 --> 00:06:50,280 Speaker 1: I mean what they did Peter during the pandemic. She 151 00:06:50,440 --> 00:06:53,320 Speaker 1: just said I'm not I'm not laying low for the pandemic. 152 00:06:53,720 --> 00:06:55,960 Speaker 1: And they just created and creating created. Look at the 153 00:06:55,960 --> 00:06:58,800 Speaker 1: payoff now, it's been phenomenal. I think one question that's 154 00:06:58,800 --> 00:07:01,040 Speaker 1: been coming up directly to our businesses what does this 155 00:07:01,120 --> 00:07:03,120 Speaker 1: do for EM and A activity. Right, We've already had 156 00:07:03,560 --> 00:07:05,919 Speaker 1: DC that doesn't like M and A activity, And now 157 00:07:05,920 --> 00:07:07,960 Speaker 1: all of a sudden you've got Live Nation these companies, 158 00:07:08,000 --> 00:07:10,480 Speaker 1: you know, getting reported on. I think it's going to 159 00:07:10,560 --> 00:07:13,480 Speaker 1: be interesting and I think that's gonna be a headwind 160 00:07:13,560 --> 00:07:15,680 Speaker 1: for M and A next year. We're really prepared to 161 00:07:15,680 --> 00:07:18,280 Speaker 1: talk about Taylor Swift. Is that really what we're doing here. 162 00:07:18,680 --> 00:07:22,160 Speaker 1: I wasn't that prepared, but I figured out the influence 163 00:07:22,160 --> 00:07:25,080 Speaker 1: of the national on What she did here acoustically was stunning. 164 00:07:25,360 --> 00:07:28,080 Speaker 1: I mean, I mean anthonas my hero, but you know, 165 00:07:28,320 --> 00:07:30,200 Speaker 1: I'm not an expert in Taylor Swift. I will say 166 00:07:30,200 --> 00:07:32,920 Speaker 1: that the controversy over some of the ticket sales is 167 00:07:32,960 --> 00:07:35,360 Speaker 1: going to be something that song alicit off fairs. Moment 168 00:07:35,440 --> 00:07:41,880 Speaker 1: I heard it, boom, Taylor Swift. Oh, I'm not actually share. 169 00:07:42,040 --> 00:07:50,320 Speaker 1: Thank you so much with Academy Securities right now. And 170 00:07:50,400 --> 00:07:52,600 Speaker 1: if you're taking notes on the equity market, get out 171 00:07:52,640 --> 00:07:55,440 Speaker 1: the pad, get out the paper, because Katie Kaminski, she 172 00:07:55,600 --> 00:07:59,800 Speaker 1: researched strategist that Alpha simplex is a turtle. She is 173 00:07:59,840 --> 00:08:05,360 Speaker 1: a turtle trader from way back, which is trend matters. Katie. 174 00:08:05,600 --> 00:08:09,320 Speaker 1: Everybody would kill for your performance this year. Still up, 175 00:08:10,800 --> 00:08:16,280 Speaker 1: what is the trend forward or our trends breaking? Now? Yeah, 176 00:08:16,280 --> 00:08:18,720 Speaker 1: it's tom. It's been a phenomenal year for trend in 177 00:08:18,800 --> 00:08:21,640 Speaker 1: a year where things are very uncertain. Um. What we 178 00:08:21,800 --> 00:08:24,080 Speaker 1: have noticed though, is that we're going through an inflection 179 00:08:24,160 --> 00:08:27,080 Speaker 1: point right now like we saw earlier this summer. We're 180 00:08:27,080 --> 00:08:30,480 Speaker 1: starting to see that shorter term signals and longer term 181 00:08:30,520 --> 00:08:33,160 Speaker 1: signals are kind of at odds UM, and so I 182 00:08:33,240 --> 00:08:35,160 Speaker 1: think we, just like the rest of the market, are 183 00:08:35,240 --> 00:08:38,760 Speaker 1: looking for a pivot to the next big trend. Uh 184 00:08:38,920 --> 00:08:41,240 Speaker 1: so far um, You're looking at a day like today, 185 00:08:41,280 --> 00:08:43,679 Speaker 1: the dollar is coming back a little bit, that may 186 00:08:43,720 --> 00:08:46,600 Speaker 1: not be over UM, and of course short bond signals 187 00:08:46,600 --> 00:08:49,160 Speaker 1: are still there in the data. Well, Katie, can you 188 00:08:49,240 --> 00:08:51,439 Speaker 1: elaborate on that, this sort of pivot point that you 189 00:08:51,520 --> 00:08:54,080 Speaker 1: see in terms of short term and longer term signals? 190 00:08:54,559 --> 00:08:57,080 Speaker 1: What is that pivoting us too? Right, We've come from 191 00:08:57,120 --> 00:08:59,480 Speaker 1: an era where bonds have been all over the place, 192 00:08:59,559 --> 00:09:02,839 Speaker 1: but we rally. Recently we saw stocks being rally both 193 00:09:02,880 --> 00:09:06,000 Speaker 1: stocks and bonds rallying. What's the new pivot? What's that 194 00:09:06,160 --> 00:09:10,560 Speaker 1: new reality? Well, the thing is we've really the challenge 195 00:09:10,559 --> 00:09:12,640 Speaker 1: has been that we've had a mixed signal, so there's 196 00:09:12,720 --> 00:09:15,920 Speaker 1: no clear signal net at this point. And that's where 197 00:09:15,960 --> 00:09:18,400 Speaker 1: I say we're definitely at an inflection point. But if 198 00:09:18,440 --> 00:09:20,319 Speaker 1: I had to look a little closer at what has 199 00:09:20,440 --> 00:09:24,000 Speaker 1: changed the most, optimism has come into signals at a 200 00:09:24,120 --> 00:09:27,240 Speaker 1: level that is consistent with what we've seen recently. So 201 00:09:27,280 --> 00:09:30,319 Speaker 1: you've seen more positive signals and equities, especially around the 202 00:09:30,360 --> 00:09:34,719 Speaker 1: CPI print. You're also seeing a little bit more reversion 203 00:09:35,360 --> 00:09:38,120 Speaker 1: out of the dollar trade, but that's still there. So 204 00:09:38,240 --> 00:09:40,680 Speaker 1: that's why I kind of said it's a balance between 205 00:09:40,800 --> 00:09:43,280 Speaker 1: what do we see shorter term and longer term, and 206 00:09:43,320 --> 00:09:46,240 Speaker 1: the longer term signals are still definitely saying that there's 207 00:09:46,280 --> 00:09:49,800 Speaker 1: some things to worry about ahead, especially the curve, the 208 00:09:49,880 --> 00:09:53,199 Speaker 1: yield curve being inverted recently. Katy, you've nailed it with 209 00:09:53,360 --> 00:09:56,440 Speaker 1: bonds in particular. You went short bonds, which has been 210 00:09:56,600 --> 00:09:58,800 Speaker 1: the widowmaker for so many years, and this was one 211 00:09:58,840 --> 00:10:01,199 Speaker 1: of the areas where absolutely knocked it out of the 212 00:10:01,240 --> 00:10:04,840 Speaker 1: park with nearly forty percent returns so far this year. 213 00:10:05,679 --> 00:10:08,040 Speaker 1: How much do you buy this conviction that we're feeling 214 00:10:08,080 --> 00:10:10,280 Speaker 1: in Wall Street that that's going to be the biggest 215 00:10:10,320 --> 00:10:12,920 Speaker 1: area of out performance by ten year, by thirty year 216 00:10:13,000 --> 00:10:15,240 Speaker 1: treasuries and you're gonna just do really well next year. 217 00:10:16,320 --> 00:10:19,079 Speaker 1: So we did some research this year on bonds. It 218 00:10:19,200 --> 00:10:21,679 Speaker 1: was called the short of shorting bonds. And one of 219 00:10:21,720 --> 00:10:23,640 Speaker 1: the things that we need to think about if we're 220 00:10:23,679 --> 00:10:27,319 Speaker 1: moving into a much more focused on rising rates and 221 00:10:27,440 --> 00:10:30,719 Speaker 1: higher rates environment, is that bonds are not going to 222 00:10:30,840 --> 00:10:33,720 Speaker 1: behave under inflationary pressures like they did in the past, 223 00:10:34,040 --> 00:10:36,120 Speaker 1: and this year was just the first data point to 224 00:10:36,160 --> 00:10:38,439 Speaker 1: show us that that's the case. And I think what 225 00:10:38,559 --> 00:10:40,559 Speaker 1: has been the most fascinating to me is how we 226 00:10:40,640 --> 00:10:43,840 Speaker 1: avoid thinking about long bias and so many of us 227 00:10:43,920 --> 00:10:46,800 Speaker 1: are so dependent on being long bonds. We forgot what 228 00:10:46,920 --> 00:10:49,600 Speaker 1: it's like to actually think about how do you deal 229 00:10:49,679 --> 00:10:51,880 Speaker 1: with actually shorting bonds and how do you deal with 230 00:10:52,360 --> 00:10:55,679 Speaker 1: bonds and valuation versus inflation? And I think that is 231 00:10:55,720 --> 00:10:57,920 Speaker 1: going to be the key question for all investors in 232 00:10:57,960 --> 00:11:01,040 Speaker 1: the next few years. What's great a trend following, folks? 233 00:11:01,080 --> 00:11:04,120 Speaker 1: And this is rumored folks, Liverpool maybe up for sale 234 00:11:04,160 --> 00:11:07,960 Speaker 1: John Henry, owner the Red Sox arch Turtle trader. Rumor 235 00:11:08,080 --> 00:11:11,319 Speaker 1: has it Henry may sell Liverpool to Kaminski. We'll have 236 00:11:11,440 --> 00:11:13,560 Speaker 1: to see on that is well. We get a lot 237 00:11:13,640 --> 00:11:16,120 Speaker 1: of emails Katie when you're when you're on with us. 238 00:11:16,200 --> 00:11:21,440 Speaker 1: Are moving averages helpful to trend followers? Yes, I mean 239 00:11:21,520 --> 00:11:23,800 Speaker 1: I think the way we think about it, moving averages 240 00:11:23,920 --> 00:11:26,920 Speaker 1: give you one way to measure the strength of a trend. 241 00:11:27,520 --> 00:11:30,080 Speaker 1: These days, we use a wide range of different methods. 242 00:11:30,200 --> 00:11:32,880 Speaker 1: Some of it is based on machine learning, some of 243 00:11:32,920 --> 00:11:36,079 Speaker 1: it is based on different types of breakout signals. But 244 00:11:36,200 --> 00:11:39,679 Speaker 1: the point is in environments where the world is very uncertain, 245 00:11:40,080 --> 00:11:42,360 Speaker 1: you have to turn to what the market is doing 246 00:11:42,760 --> 00:11:45,240 Speaker 1: as opposed to what it should do, because frankly, a 247 00:11:45,320 --> 00:11:47,680 Speaker 1: few people actually know what it should do these days, 248 00:11:47,800 --> 00:11:51,520 Speaker 1: because it's so volatile and unclear what the future is 249 00:11:51,520 --> 00:11:56,079 Speaker 1: actually going to hold under this inflationary environment. Katie, thank 250 00:11:56,120 --> 00:11:59,679 Speaker 1: you so much. Katie Kaminski, arguably the number one performance 251 00:11:59,720 --> 00:12:13,320 Speaker 1: of Rayance Girls this year at alphason Plus. Right now, 252 00:12:13,440 --> 00:12:15,599 Speaker 1: we're going to turn to some of the focus on 253 00:12:15,880 --> 00:12:18,640 Speaker 1: the year ahead. One of the biggest consensus calls go 254 00:12:18,880 --> 00:12:21,240 Speaker 1: along bonds. David Riley, chief of US was strategist at 255 00:12:21,240 --> 00:12:23,880 Speaker 1: Blue Bay Asset Management. Here to weigh in, is this 256 00:12:23,960 --> 00:12:25,839 Speaker 1: year number one as well? Ten year, thirty year, The 257 00:12:25,920 --> 00:12:29,640 Speaker 1: longer the better. M Yeah. I do think it's going 258 00:12:29,720 --> 00:12:33,959 Speaker 1: to be a year when duration actually pays off and 259 00:12:34,120 --> 00:12:36,800 Speaker 1: it will make sense to be long duration. I'm actually 260 00:12:36,840 --> 00:12:40,240 Speaker 1: more inclined to go in terms of the Treasury curve 261 00:12:40,280 --> 00:12:45,120 Speaker 1: towards the five year point, and that's because I do 262 00:12:45,320 --> 00:12:48,320 Speaker 1: think that it's more likely than not that the US 263 00:12:48,360 --> 00:12:52,160 Speaker 1: economy goes into recession. I think we'll probably could therefore 264 00:12:52,280 --> 00:12:57,600 Speaker 1: get some balls deepening in the curve. Normally you'd express 265 00:12:57,640 --> 00:13:00,360 Speaker 1: that at the very short end, but we don't really 266 00:13:00,480 --> 00:13:03,000 Speaker 1: know how far and how fast inflation we fall, and 267 00:13:03,080 --> 00:13:06,240 Speaker 1: therefore we don't really know at what point does the 268 00:13:06,360 --> 00:13:09,600 Speaker 1: FED start considering ray cards. I think the five year 269 00:13:10,040 --> 00:13:13,199 Speaker 1: is probably quite a good sort of sweet spot, and 270 00:13:13,400 --> 00:13:16,400 Speaker 1: with that would also be buying some high grade credit 271 00:13:16,480 --> 00:13:19,640 Speaker 1: at this level as well. See he likes the five 272 00:13:19,720 --> 00:13:25,200 Speaker 1: year action, That's what he was just saying right there. Well, 273 00:13:25,240 --> 00:13:27,600 Speaker 1: thank you, dud. I do wonder, though, at what point 274 00:13:27,640 --> 00:13:29,880 Speaker 1: you're looking at a return to the old normal, right 275 00:13:29,920 --> 00:13:32,000 Speaker 1: at this idea that we're going back to an inflation 276 00:13:32,080 --> 00:13:35,080 Speaker 1: that's sub two percent or even two and other people 277 00:13:35,160 --> 00:13:38,000 Speaker 1: pushing back, where do you say to them, Look, we're 278 00:13:38,040 --> 00:13:40,199 Speaker 1: not going to have a high inflation regime for a 279 00:13:40,360 --> 00:13:42,840 Speaker 1: very long time, and bonds will be able to reassert 280 00:13:42,920 --> 00:13:46,680 Speaker 1: themselves in a way that we're used to. M Well, 281 00:13:46,800 --> 00:13:49,480 Speaker 1: because I do think that we are at all very 282 00:13:49,559 --> 00:13:52,719 Speaker 1: close to the peak in inflation. And yeah, I think 283 00:13:52,760 --> 00:13:55,319 Speaker 1: it's right to highlight just how much uncertainty we do 284 00:13:55,520 --> 00:13:58,920 Speaker 1: have in terms of how far and how fast inflation 285 00:13:58,960 --> 00:14:01,280 Speaker 1: falls and that's obviously very critical for the fair and 286 00:14:01,440 --> 00:14:05,400 Speaker 1: other central banks, and therefore for the outlook for the 287 00:14:05,480 --> 00:14:07,920 Speaker 1: BOB market. But I don't see a sort of self 288 00:14:08,040 --> 00:14:12,959 Speaker 1: fulfilling or self perpetuating ways price spiral. And if you 289 00:14:13,040 --> 00:14:15,160 Speaker 1: think we're going into recession, as I think we are 290 00:14:15,280 --> 00:14:18,640 Speaker 1: going into not only a European but also US and 291 00:14:19,120 --> 00:14:22,840 Speaker 1: global recession, UM, that's very negative and all sorts of 292 00:14:22,920 --> 00:14:25,160 Speaker 1: ways and and and Saturday people are going to be 293 00:14:25,240 --> 00:14:27,480 Speaker 1: losing their jobs on the back about that. But we 294 00:14:27,600 --> 00:14:31,520 Speaker 1: know from experience that does bring inflation down. Inflation is 295 00:14:31,600 --> 00:14:33,920 Speaker 1: going to be coming down, it's just about the pace 296 00:14:34,000 --> 00:14:37,760 Speaker 1: and the magnitude of that through next year. David tell 297 00:14:37,840 --> 00:14:40,720 Speaker 1: me about the value of cash here, if we're quote 298 00:14:40,800 --> 00:14:44,440 Speaker 1: unquote going into a recession, is cash good or is 299 00:14:44,520 --> 00:14:50,320 Speaker 1: cash trash? UM? I do think that as we go 300 00:14:50,480 --> 00:14:53,680 Speaker 1: into recession, I think what is going to be of 301 00:14:53,800 --> 00:14:58,240 Speaker 1: particular value is to have liquidity within portfolios. That some 302 00:14:58,360 --> 00:15:02,520 Speaker 1: of that's going to come from having holdings of UM cash. 303 00:15:02,880 --> 00:15:06,600 Speaker 1: But I also think it means a bias towards UM 304 00:15:07,600 --> 00:15:12,080 Speaker 1: credit call fixed income, which is now giving you a yield. 305 00:15:12,120 --> 00:15:14,160 Speaker 1: I mean, one of the key differences. There's a lot 306 00:15:14,200 --> 00:15:16,120 Speaker 1: of differences. But one of the key differences going into 307 00:15:16,840 --> 00:15:20,600 Speaker 1: three compared to when we went into two, when we 308 00:15:20,640 --> 00:15:23,320 Speaker 1: went into this year, is that we're actually starting with 309 00:15:23,800 --> 00:15:28,080 Speaker 1: much higher levels of yield and that's giving you an 310 00:15:28,160 --> 00:15:32,400 Speaker 1: inconcussion which you otherwise wouldn't you know, didn't have at 311 00:15:32,440 --> 00:15:35,880 Speaker 1: the start of two. So you have some liquidity, have 312 00:15:36,080 --> 00:15:38,840 Speaker 1: some cash. I think a bias towards the more liquid securities, 313 00:15:39,160 --> 00:15:40,800 Speaker 1: but I don't think it's an inviting I think that 314 00:15:40,920 --> 00:15:42,920 Speaker 1: our opportunities out there for you to deploy cash. I 315 00:15:42,920 --> 00:15:45,800 Speaker 1: wouldn't be holding too much care. David. We need you 316 00:15:45,880 --> 00:15:47,720 Speaker 1: to get back to England around I know that's what 317 00:15:47,840 --> 00:15:50,920 Speaker 1: you're really focused on. Here. We thank you for coming on. 318 00:15:51,080 --> 00:15:54,000 Speaker 1: We've got people outside. There's a ticketing snare for at 319 00:15:54,040 --> 00:15:58,360 Speaker 1: the stadium. I players down worldwide. But also in minute 320 00:15:58,440 --> 00:16:03,400 Speaker 1: three with McGuire and answering David, somebody talks about a 321 00:16:03,680 --> 00:16:08,520 Speaker 1: Stone banker of a penalty. Can I mean Phararell's not here, David, 322 00:16:08,680 --> 00:16:14,560 Speaker 1: save us? What does stone barker me? You've called me 323 00:16:14,640 --> 00:16:18,120 Speaker 1: out there, Tom. I'm not sure what actually means, but 324 00:16:18,240 --> 00:16:22,640 Speaker 1: it sounds like it's a nailed on um penalty that 325 00:16:22,760 --> 00:16:25,240 Speaker 1: has been conceded and by the way you described it, 326 00:16:25,720 --> 00:16:28,080 Speaker 1: um it sounds that may have been conceded by England, 327 00:16:28,120 --> 00:16:32,000 Speaker 1: which would rather be in keeping with the start that 328 00:16:32,080 --> 00:16:34,720 Speaker 1: England often make two World Cup tournaments, a lot of 329 00:16:34,760 --> 00:16:37,400 Speaker 1: the build up and then some disappointment when the game 330 00:16:37,440 --> 00:16:40,320 Speaker 1: gets underway. Let's hope I'm wrong and let's hope it's 331 00:16:40,360 --> 00:16:43,520 Speaker 1: different this time around. David Riley with piercing analysis. They're 332 00:16:43,640 --> 00:16:47,040 Speaker 1: in for John Farrell as well, David Riley, Blue Bay 333 00:16:47,040 --> 00:16:53,840 Speaker 1: Asset managic. Right now, we're going to stop the show. 334 00:16:54,200 --> 00:16:57,360 Speaker 1: And we made a decision here at least fifteen years 335 00:16:57,400 --> 00:17:00,440 Speaker 1: ago to say, yes, we do economics, financing and investment, 336 00:17:00,960 --> 00:17:04,200 Speaker 1: but far more we do international relations, not knowing the 337 00:17:04,280 --> 00:17:07,720 Speaker 1: world would be turned upside down as we have seen 338 00:17:08,200 --> 00:17:12,040 Speaker 1: in the recent decades. Providing leadership worldwide on that has 339 00:17:12,119 --> 00:17:15,960 Speaker 1: been Richard hass He's President of the Council on Foreign Relations. 340 00:17:16,280 --> 00:17:18,960 Speaker 1: Full disclosure, I'm a member. When I pay my dues, 341 00:17:19,160 --> 00:17:21,720 Speaker 1: I think I'm behind my dudes. Richard Hospul, Well, we'll 342 00:17:21,800 --> 00:17:25,119 Speaker 1: go there another time. He is the bitcoin that payment 343 00:17:25,200 --> 00:17:29,960 Speaker 1: was the bitcoin worked out. Richard hass is retiring, pulling 344 00:17:30,000 --> 00:17:35,280 Speaker 1: away from truly his Counsel and Foreign Relations Richard has 345 00:17:35,400 --> 00:17:37,080 Speaker 1: thank you so much for joining us so much to 346 00:17:37,119 --> 00:17:40,840 Speaker 1: talk about today. Where must the Council on Foreign Relations 347 00:17:40,920 --> 00:17:47,399 Speaker 1: go to lead as fractious international diplomacy. Well, Tom freshwell, 348 00:17:47,440 --> 00:17:50,040 Speaker 1: I'm not retiring from anything. I'm departing the Council after 349 00:17:50,160 --> 00:17:53,880 Speaker 1: twenty years, but I'm gonna stay active in the public conversation, 350 00:17:54,400 --> 00:17:57,000 Speaker 1: both about this country's role in the world as well 351 00:17:57,080 --> 00:18:00,520 Speaker 1: as about the future of American democracy. But I think 352 00:18:00,560 --> 00:18:03,240 Speaker 1: it's healthy for institutions despite what's going on in Disney. 353 00:18:03,640 --> 00:18:05,879 Speaker 1: I think it's kind of healthy for institutions every now 354 00:18:05,920 --> 00:18:09,080 Speaker 1: and then to have a change in uh in leadership. 355 00:18:09,080 --> 00:18:11,280 Speaker 1: I think for the Council, it's simply to continue to 356 00:18:11,359 --> 00:18:14,359 Speaker 1: be a resource on a wide range of challenges, whether 357 00:18:14,440 --> 00:18:18,439 Speaker 1: it's the revival of geopolitics or global issues. We are 358 00:18:18,480 --> 00:18:22,840 Speaker 1: we're just finishing up a the COP twenty seven meeting 359 00:18:22,920 --> 00:18:26,399 Speaker 1: in Charmel Shake, and quite honestly, I think it's almost 360 00:18:26,440 --> 00:18:29,480 Speaker 1: a complete and utter, utter failure. And I also think 361 00:18:30,000 --> 00:18:32,760 Speaker 1: increasingly we need to look at the relationship between America 362 00:18:32,840 --> 00:18:36,680 Speaker 1: internally and America externally and whether we're ever gonna be 363 00:18:36,920 --> 00:18:40,119 Speaker 1: positioned to again lead the world because this world is 364 00:18:40,200 --> 00:18:42,680 Speaker 1: not going to organize itself to meet the challenges it 365 00:18:42,760 --> 00:18:48,040 Speaker 1: faces without an involved and effective United States. So I 366 00:18:48,119 --> 00:18:50,440 Speaker 1: think the the inbox in this field is as full 367 00:18:50,520 --> 00:18:53,240 Speaker 1: as it's ever been. I agree that strongly in folks, 368 00:18:53,280 --> 00:18:56,000 Speaker 1: A brief here, two hundred forty pages is Richard Hass. 369 00:18:56,320 --> 00:18:59,840 Speaker 1: The bill of obligations is he, and we go in 370 00:19:00,040 --> 00:19:03,640 Speaker 1: search of the will of America to move forward. Richard Hass, 371 00:19:03,800 --> 00:19:07,520 Speaker 1: the new administration, the new Congress, the new presidency two 372 00:19:07,640 --> 00:19:10,440 Speaker 1: years out, do they have the will to find their 373 00:19:10,480 --> 00:19:14,320 Speaker 1: bill of obligations? I don't see a lot of it. Tom, 374 00:19:14,359 --> 00:19:17,000 Speaker 1: I'll be honest, you know, I don't think we're off 375 00:19:17,040 --> 00:19:20,440 Speaker 1: to a great start. The new Republican House of Representatives 376 00:19:20,480 --> 00:19:24,920 Speaker 1: seems much more interested in politics than policy, and investigations 377 00:19:25,000 --> 00:19:29,000 Speaker 1: than legislation. I think for the next two years it's 378 00:19:29,040 --> 00:19:32,200 Speaker 1: going to be extraordinarily difficult for the Biden administration to 379 00:19:32,320 --> 00:19:36,040 Speaker 1: get legislation passed really about anything. I think you're going 380 00:19:36,080 --> 00:19:39,920 Speaker 1: to see there for an emphasis on foreign policy, where 381 00:19:40,000 --> 00:19:43,920 Speaker 1: presidents traditionally have more discretion than they do on things domestic, 382 00:19:44,280 --> 00:19:48,800 Speaker 1: and probably a greater emphasis on regulation on executive action 383 00:19:49,240 --> 00:19:53,119 Speaker 1: again to essentially find ways to do things without requiring 384 00:19:53,600 --> 00:19:57,359 Speaker 1: Congress to to join in this fractius global order. How 385 00:19:57,440 --> 00:19:59,960 Speaker 1: confident are you that the US remain close to Europe, 386 00:20:00,359 --> 00:20:03,240 Speaker 1: at least as close to Europe as they have traditionally 387 00:20:03,400 --> 00:20:06,960 Speaker 1: basis of the recent fissures not only with respect to 388 00:20:07,080 --> 00:20:09,520 Speaker 1: exactly how to deal with the energy crisis, but also 389 00:20:09,600 --> 00:20:13,560 Speaker 1: with tech investments and some of the the the bills 390 00:20:13,600 --> 00:20:15,560 Speaker 1: that Congress has passed so far that really focused in 391 00:20:15,560 --> 00:20:18,240 Speaker 1: the US to good question is I think it's a 392 00:20:18,280 --> 00:20:22,040 Speaker 1: mixed record. On one hand, if this administration, the Biden administration, 393 00:20:22,160 --> 00:20:24,760 Speaker 1: stands for anything and it's a it's an alliance first 394 00:20:24,800 --> 00:20:27,879 Speaker 1: foreign policy, and I think the entire management of the 395 00:20:28,040 --> 00:20:31,720 Speaker 1: Ukraine crisis, the Russian crisis has been has been pretty good. 396 00:20:32,119 --> 00:20:34,960 Speaker 1: You also see your growth in trans Atlantic trade, whether 397 00:20:35,000 --> 00:20:39,040 Speaker 1: it because of energy or a d emphasis on trading 398 00:20:39,080 --> 00:20:42,239 Speaker 1: with adversaries or re emphasis on trading with with UH 399 00:20:42,640 --> 00:20:45,480 Speaker 1: with friends. Where I'm worried about over the long term 400 00:20:45,760 --> 00:20:48,159 Speaker 1: is not so much Russia as it is China, and 401 00:20:48,280 --> 00:20:51,080 Speaker 1: I think there could be a growing split between what 402 00:20:51,200 --> 00:20:55,400 Speaker 1: you might call American economic pressure on China, almost economic warfare, 403 00:20:55,840 --> 00:20:58,880 Speaker 1: and Europe, led by Germany looking to China in many 404 00:20:58,920 --> 00:21:03,160 Speaker 1: ways to compensate for the loss of economic ties with Russia. 405 00:21:03,520 --> 00:21:06,160 Speaker 1: And if there were to ever be a crisis over Taiwan, 406 00:21:06,320 --> 00:21:10,120 Speaker 1: this divergence across the Atlantic one makes a crisis more 407 00:21:10,200 --> 00:21:13,919 Speaker 1: likely because China may not fear sanctions, or if there 408 00:21:13,960 --> 00:21:17,520 Speaker 1: were a crisis in the United States wanted to introduce sanctions, 409 00:21:17,800 --> 00:21:20,919 Speaker 1: I could imagine a big transatlantic split. This is really important, 410 00:21:21,000 --> 00:21:23,440 Speaker 1: especially as German Chancellor all Off Souls just went to 411 00:21:23,560 --> 00:21:27,360 Speaker 1: China with a bunch of executives of big industrial companies. 412 00:21:27,640 --> 00:21:29,800 Speaker 1: How much do you give credence? Then the softening in 413 00:21:29,920 --> 00:21:32,480 Speaker 1: tone that we've heard at least recently with the US 414 00:21:32,760 --> 00:21:35,480 Speaker 1: and China and Tony blinking blinking heading over there early 415 00:21:35,600 --> 00:21:38,680 Speaker 1: next year. Look, I think it's good. I'm an old 416 00:21:38,720 --> 00:21:41,719 Speaker 1: fashioned diplomat, so I actually happened to believe in diplomacy. 417 00:21:41,880 --> 00:21:44,320 Speaker 1: I think that's progress. I thought the meeting in Bali 418 00:21:45,200 --> 00:21:47,680 Speaker 1: was a useful exchange. I think it's useful to have 419 00:21:47,800 --> 00:21:50,520 Speaker 1: follow up. But let's not kid ourselves. These countries are 420 00:21:50,560 --> 00:21:53,840 Speaker 1: in very different pages. The question is whether they can 421 00:21:53,920 --> 00:21:56,600 Speaker 1: set up some rules of the road about how to 422 00:21:56,680 --> 00:21:59,480 Speaker 1: limit their differences over Taiwan. So it doesn't lead to 423 00:21:59,560 --> 00:22:02,040 Speaker 1: complic But I don't see any sign, for example, that 424 00:22:02,160 --> 00:22:04,399 Speaker 1: China is lending a hand to deal with North Korea, 425 00:22:04,720 --> 00:22:08,600 Speaker 1: which is busy building up nuclear weapons and shooting off missiles. 426 00:22:08,800 --> 00:22:10,960 Speaker 1: I don't see the China's helping with Iran. We can 427 00:22:11,000 --> 00:22:14,000 Speaker 1: go around the world, so geo politically, the two countries 428 00:22:14,040 --> 00:22:16,159 Speaker 1: are not on the same page. China is still not 429 00:22:16,280 --> 00:22:19,639 Speaker 1: helping with with with climate much. So again, to me, 430 00:22:19,720 --> 00:22:21,560 Speaker 1: the real question of the United States and China with 431 00:22:21,680 --> 00:22:24,639 Speaker 1: these talks is whether they can avoid negatives more than 432 00:22:24,680 --> 00:22:29,080 Speaker 1: a chief positives. Richard Hasash, I grew up with part 433 00:22:29,119 --> 00:22:32,480 Speaker 1: of the house being a middle twentieth century isolation is 434 00:22:32,560 --> 00:22:36,840 Speaker 1: what was called a Chicago Tribune Midwest isolationism, something I'm 435 00:22:36,880 --> 00:22:40,240 Speaker 1: sure you saw west of Overland, Ohio. And when I 436 00:22:40,320 --> 00:22:42,720 Speaker 1: look at where we are today, Richard hass, we have 437 00:22:42,840 --> 00:22:47,200 Speaker 1: a new isolationism. It's always there, but this time it's 438 00:22:47,280 --> 00:22:53,760 Speaker 1: different color. The character of America's new isolationism, right, we're 439 00:22:53,760 --> 00:22:56,399 Speaker 1: seeing it Tom and it doesn't respect party lines. We're 440 00:22:56,440 --> 00:22:59,440 Speaker 1: seeing it in both the Republican Party and the Democratic Party. 441 00:23:00,280 --> 00:23:02,520 Speaker 1: You see in the Republican Party a kind of flirtation 442 00:23:02,640 --> 00:23:06,080 Speaker 1: with Russia, this talk about conditioning or limiting aid to 443 00:23:06,800 --> 00:23:10,280 Speaker 1: Ukraine on the progressive side of the Democratic Party again 444 00:23:10,359 --> 00:23:13,320 Speaker 1: and in patience over money spent for foreign policy or 445 00:23:13,440 --> 00:23:16,520 Speaker 1: national security abroad, wanting to see more at home. What's 446 00:23:16,560 --> 00:23:19,600 Speaker 1: missing on both sides of the aisle is an appreciation 447 00:23:19,720 --> 00:23:21,840 Speaker 1: of two things. One is that money spent on foreign 448 00:23:21,920 --> 00:23:24,199 Speaker 1: policy is good for us here at home. We are 449 00:23:24,240 --> 00:23:26,440 Speaker 1: not going to do well in a world that unravels 450 00:23:26,480 --> 00:23:28,359 Speaker 1: and to use my favorite word, in a world and 451 00:23:29,160 --> 00:23:31,960 Speaker 1: in disarray. Secondly, what ails us at home for the 452 00:23:32,040 --> 00:23:34,879 Speaker 1: most part is not a lack of resources being spent. 453 00:23:35,240 --> 00:23:38,040 Speaker 1: You look at how much we're spending domestically, that's not 454 00:23:38,200 --> 00:23:40,760 Speaker 1: the problem. It's how we spend money is the issue, 455 00:23:40,840 --> 00:23:44,040 Speaker 1: much more than how how much we spend. Plus increasingly 456 00:23:44,160 --> 00:23:46,800 Speaker 1: is you know better than anybody. What's crowding out a 457 00:23:46,880 --> 00:23:50,440 Speaker 1: lot of useful forms of domestic spending is not national security. 458 00:23:50,760 --> 00:23:53,960 Speaker 1: It's servicing our debt. And that's something. If people on 459 00:23:54,080 --> 00:23:56,440 Speaker 1: the left and the right wanted to free up money 460 00:23:56,520 --> 00:23:59,640 Speaker 1: to devote to domestic causes, they could focus very much 461 00:24:00,119 --> 00:24:02,680 Speaker 1: on the size of America's death. Richard Hoss, thank you 462 00:24:02,800 --> 00:24:06,920 Speaker 1: so much. With the council and his Council on Foreign Relations. 463 00:24:06,960 --> 00:24:09,640 Speaker 1: The new book, The Bill of Obligations, is the will 464 00:24:09,800 --> 00:24:14,359 Speaker 1: out there to move forward into the next decade. This 465 00:24:14,560 --> 00:24:18,320 Speaker 1: is the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. Thanks for listening. Join us 466 00:24:18,400 --> 00:24:22,160 Speaker 1: live weekdays from seven to ten am Eastern on Bloomberg 467 00:24:22,240 --> 00:24:26,040 Speaker 1: Radio and on Bloomberg Television each day from six to 468 00:24:26,200 --> 00:24:30,840 Speaker 1: nine am for insight from the best in economics, finance, investment, 469 00:24:31,000 --> 00:24:36,000 Speaker 1: and international relations. And subscribe to the Surveillance podcast on 470 00:24:36,119 --> 00:24:39,920 Speaker 1: Apple podcast, SoundCloud, Bloomberg dot com, and of course on 471 00:24:40,040 --> 00:24:44,119 Speaker 1: the terminal. I'm Tom Keene, and this is Bloomberg