WEBVTT - MLB: Leading Off September 26th, 2022 (Ep. 603)

0:00:12.920 --> 0:00:15.480
<v Speaker 1>Welcome in Brendos to Leading Off.

0:00:15.800 --> 0:00:19.200
<v Speaker 2>The final week of Leading Off. That's right, I am

0:00:19.239 --> 0:00:22.119
<v Speaker 2>your host, Chris Welsh. Joining me today is Andrew Seifer.

0:00:22.160 --> 0:00:24.600
<v Speaker 1>You can find him on Twitter at Andrew Underscore Seifer.

0:00:24.440 --> 0:00:26.920
<v Speaker 2>Me at is it the Welsh and Andrew? Not only

0:00:27.000 --> 0:00:29.360
<v Speaker 2>is this the final week, this is your final show

0:00:29.480 --> 0:00:31.280
<v Speaker 2>on Leading Off as you've been joining me for the

0:00:31.320 --> 0:00:34.520
<v Speaker 2>last couple of months. How have the championship runs been

0:00:34.520 --> 0:00:36.800
<v Speaker 2>going and is this going to be a tight race

0:00:36.840 --> 0:00:38.920
<v Speaker 2>in the final week for that Rodo ship.

0:00:39.840 --> 0:00:42.519
<v Speaker 3>Well, I'm feeling pretty good about that. I'm feeling very

0:00:43.479 --> 0:00:45.760
<v Speaker 3>sad about it being my final appearance on Leading Off

0:00:45.760 --> 0:00:46.280
<v Speaker 3>for the season.

0:00:46.320 --> 0:00:47.720
<v Speaker 4>It's been a great ride.

0:00:47.880 --> 0:00:50.280
<v Speaker 3>I guess I'm metaphorically getting moved down to the batting order

0:00:50.320 --> 0:00:54.960
<v Speaker 3>no longer leading Off. But yeah, the teams are going great.

0:00:55.040 --> 0:00:57.200
<v Speaker 3>I'm I'm sort of in cruise control, honestly. In that

0:00:57.280 --> 0:00:59.840
<v Speaker 3>home league I've talked about so much. I'm up twenty

0:01:00.040 --> 0:01:03.200
<v Speaker 3>points now heading into the final week, so I've kind

0:01:03.200 --> 0:01:06.200
<v Speaker 3>of just blown the competition out of the water. My

0:01:06.240 --> 0:01:09.039
<v Speaker 3>friend was messaging me during our fantasy football draft and

0:01:09.080 --> 0:01:11.760
<v Speaker 3>he's like, I still can't get over that run you

0:01:11.800 --> 0:01:15.560
<v Speaker 3>made in August, so it's a nice time to be alive.

0:01:15.560 --> 0:01:16.920
<v Speaker 4>But I will miss being on the show.

0:01:17.160 --> 0:01:20.720
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, one hundred percent, Danas asked aw Man. No offseason

0:01:21.440 --> 0:01:23.679
<v Speaker 2>as of this moment, not planned, but you guys can ask.

0:01:23.720 --> 0:01:27.119
<v Speaker 2>You guys feel free to flood them with We want

0:01:27.160 --> 0:01:29.880
<v Speaker 2>the Welsh, and we want the crew, the Peanuts and

0:01:29.920 --> 0:01:30.640
<v Speaker 2>the cracker Jacks.

0:01:30.640 --> 0:01:32.080
<v Speaker 1>We want more. You just got to flood them and

0:01:32.120 --> 0:01:32.520
<v Speaker 1>let him know.

0:01:32.560 --> 0:01:34.119
<v Speaker 2>But as far as I know, this is the final

0:01:34.120 --> 0:01:38.800
<v Speaker 2>week and and coming up on Friday, but the final show,

0:01:39.200 --> 0:01:42.200
<v Speaker 2>I have confirmed it. We have a celebrity joining us

0:01:42.240 --> 0:01:46.920
<v Speaker 2>on Friday, mister Joe Pisa Pia is weak and he

0:01:47.160 --> 0:01:50.160
<v Speaker 2>will be back for the final show. And another piece

0:01:50.160 --> 0:01:56.880
<v Speaker 2>of news, it's his birthday today, so birthday, no, it'll

0:01:56.920 --> 0:01:58.400
<v Speaker 2>be you know what. And I was thinking about this too.

0:01:59.160 --> 0:02:02.080
<v Speaker 2>We should we should have had I should have talked

0:02:02.080 --> 0:02:05.080
<v Speaker 2>to Wonky about this. What a great day this would

0:02:05.080 --> 0:02:07.280
<v Speaker 2>have been to have a home run bonus. We really

0:02:08.000 --> 0:02:10.440
<v Speaker 2>it's not my contest, then the home run bonus. I

0:02:10.440 --> 0:02:12.519
<v Speaker 2>thought it would have been really great if every day

0:02:12.520 --> 0:02:14.600
<v Speaker 2>this week there was a bonus in this final run

0:02:14.760 --> 0:02:18.360
<v Speaker 2>and today's bonus would have been double homers for any

0:02:18.440 --> 0:02:20.919
<v Speaker 2>bald player that you pick that hits a home run

0:02:20.960 --> 0:02:25.480
<v Speaker 2>today in honor of Joe Piezapia, who I think turned.

0:02:25.240 --> 0:02:28.880
<v Speaker 1>Sixty eight this year, so you know, hat tip to Joe.

0:02:29.440 --> 0:02:32.680
<v Speaker 2>He's closing in on retirement and his birthday is today,

0:02:32.680 --> 0:02:34.720
<v Speaker 2>so make sure you shout him out and he will

0:02:34.720 --> 0:02:37.960
<v Speaker 2>be back again with us on Friday, the old crew

0:02:38.040 --> 0:02:40.440
<v Speaker 2>of me and Joe back in the saddle. So people

0:02:40.480 --> 0:02:42.680
<v Speaker 2>asking I don't know who to hit up, So I

0:02:42.680 --> 0:02:44.360
<v Speaker 2>mean I kind of do. But you can hit up

0:02:44.400 --> 0:02:46.360
<v Speaker 2>all of the people over in the discord, all the

0:02:46.400 --> 0:02:48.160
<v Speaker 2>main important people you want off season.

0:02:48.160 --> 0:02:49.080
<v Speaker 1>Feel free to ask.

0:02:49.160 --> 0:02:51.760
<v Speaker 2>But as of this moment, that Joe and I show

0:02:51.760 --> 0:02:54.000
<v Speaker 2>on Friday should be the last one. But we don't

0:02:54.000 --> 0:02:54.760
<v Speaker 2>need to focus on that.

0:02:55.120 --> 0:02:57.280
<v Speaker 3>Well, I knew I liked that Joe guy, and now

0:02:57.320 --> 0:03:00.200
<v Speaker 3>I know why because my birthday's tomorrow. So sleebra's to

0:03:00.200 --> 0:03:03.080
<v Speaker 3>stick together. Us hairless guys got to stick together. So

0:03:03.880 --> 0:03:05.200
<v Speaker 3>happy birthday, Joe.

0:03:05.280 --> 0:03:06.079
<v Speaker 1>Happy birthday.

0:03:06.080 --> 0:03:06.240
<v Speaker 4>Man.

0:03:06.360 --> 0:03:08.400
<v Speaker 1>You could probably be his son. I think, what are

0:03:08.400 --> 0:03:11.119
<v Speaker 1>you going to turn like thirty thirty.

0:03:10.800 --> 0:03:15.480
<v Speaker 4>One something right here in the ballpark, as they.

0:03:15.320 --> 0:03:18.240
<v Speaker 2>Said, yeah, and Joe's like, you know, it's like in

0:03:18.280 --> 0:03:20.400
<v Speaker 2>the sixties, or something. Joe's not really, but you know

0:03:20.400 --> 0:03:22.959
<v Speaker 2>we like to play like that. Yeah, Wonky, I could

0:03:23.000 --> 0:03:24.760
<v Speaker 2>have decided that, but I should have thought of it earlier.

0:03:24.760 --> 0:03:27.200
<v Speaker 2>I thought of it literally as I was talking with

0:03:27.280 --> 0:03:29.680
<v Speaker 2>Joe yesterday. I was talking with him yesterday and we

0:03:29.680 --> 0:03:31.600
<v Speaker 2>didn't talk about birthdays. I didn't know it was but

0:03:31.639 --> 0:03:33.480
<v Speaker 2>it would have been. Uh, it would have been fun

0:03:33.520 --> 0:03:35.960
<v Speaker 2>to do that. Oh, and Wonkey says, you can email

0:03:36.320 --> 0:03:38.680
<v Speaker 2>info address on Fantasy Pros if you'd like.

0:03:38.720 --> 0:03:40.000
<v Speaker 1>If you guys want some more off season.

0:03:40.040 --> 0:03:43.160
<v Speaker 2>I would love to do some more off season with Wonky,

0:03:43.400 --> 0:03:44.480
<v Speaker 2>with Andrew and with.

0:03:44.480 --> 0:03:46.839
<v Speaker 1>The whole crew. But you know, we'll have to see.

0:03:46.880 --> 0:03:48.400
<v Speaker 1>I think there's a lot of applicable stuff there.

0:03:48.400 --> 0:03:50.800
<v Speaker 2>But let's talk about the things that have got us

0:03:50.840 --> 0:03:54.000
<v Speaker 2>here to our championships, or just the likes of baseball.

0:03:54.680 --> 0:03:56.800
<v Speaker 1>Albert Albert pooholes.

0:03:56.360 --> 0:04:01.000
<v Speaker 2>As Will Fare would have said, as as Harry Carey.

0:04:01.160 --> 0:04:03.360
<v Speaker 2>Albert pool holes hom twice on Friday to become the

0:04:03.360 --> 0:04:06.840
<v Speaker 2>fourth player to reach seven hundred homers in his career.

0:04:07.080 --> 0:04:09.480
<v Speaker 2>And if I remember correctly, I believe.

0:04:09.680 --> 0:04:12.160
<v Speaker 1>He did it on Apple TV. Isn't that right? So

0:04:12.520 --> 0:04:13.880
<v Speaker 1>nobody saw it? Nobody?

0:04:13.920 --> 0:04:14.040
<v Speaker 4>Why?

0:04:14.520 --> 0:04:17.240
<v Speaker 2>Only reason I did, by the way, is because I

0:04:17.240 --> 0:04:18.760
<v Speaker 2>got a brand new phone like a month and a

0:04:18.800 --> 0:04:22.000
<v Speaker 2>half ago and they threw Apple TV in as part

0:04:22.040 --> 0:04:22.919
<v Speaker 2>of my new service.

0:04:23.160 --> 0:04:25.800
<v Speaker 1>So I have Apple TV. But I'm probably one of

0:04:25.839 --> 0:04:27.640
<v Speaker 1>the like ninety.

0:04:27.360 --> 0:04:30.159
<v Speaker 2>Four people who care about baseball that had Apple TV

0:04:30.240 --> 0:04:32.760
<v Speaker 2>and got to actually witness it. Not on a highlight reel,

0:04:32.800 --> 0:04:35.160
<v Speaker 2>but he did it. He officially did it. Andrew and

0:04:35.200 --> 0:04:36.640
<v Speaker 2>pool Holes is at seven hundred.

0:04:37.160 --> 0:04:38.000
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, so awesome.

0:04:38.040 --> 0:04:39.920
<v Speaker 3>And if you had said at the start of his

0:04:39.960 --> 0:04:42.320
<v Speaker 3>career that he was going to reach seven hundred home

0:04:42.400 --> 0:04:45.159
<v Speaker 3>runs on Apple TV, people would have been very confused

0:04:45.200 --> 0:04:48.000
<v Speaker 3>what you were talking about. But it's a wonderful world

0:04:48.040 --> 0:04:51.480
<v Speaker 3>we live in with modern technology. I will say, you know,

0:04:51.520 --> 0:04:54.480
<v Speaker 3>I feel like Albert pool Holes he's the true heir

0:04:54.560 --> 0:04:57.880
<v Speaker 3>to the Hank Aaron legacy because a fun fact is

0:04:57.880 --> 0:04:59.920
<v Speaker 3>that he never hit fifty home runs in a season,

0:05:00.240 --> 0:05:03.440
<v Speaker 3>and neither did Hank Aaron, So you know, they were

0:05:03.480 --> 0:05:06.760
<v Speaker 3>just the models of consistency. Forty home runs every single year,

0:05:06.880 --> 0:05:10.120
<v Speaker 3>over and over and over again to get to that milestone.

0:05:10.680 --> 0:05:13.760
<v Speaker 3>It's a great milestone and it's a lesson for Aaron. Judge,

0:05:13.760 --> 0:05:15.520
<v Speaker 3>don't cut it too close to the end, because the

0:05:15.520 --> 0:05:17.600
<v Speaker 3>closer you get to the end, the more pressure there

0:05:17.720 --> 0:05:21.599
<v Speaker 3>is to do it. So Poohols was wisely getting to

0:05:21.640 --> 0:05:22.640
<v Speaker 3>his milestone early.

0:05:23.120 --> 0:05:25.440
<v Speaker 2>My favorite thing about all of this, too, is the

0:05:25.480 --> 0:05:29.160
<v Speaker 2>internal stories of like the home runs of like you know,

0:05:29.320 --> 0:05:31.400
<v Speaker 2>the one guy I think who caught seven hundred like

0:05:31.440 --> 0:05:34.520
<v Speaker 2>immediately left the stadium and is being offered five hundred

0:05:34.800 --> 0:05:36.800
<v Speaker 2>thousand to a million. I believe there was an auction

0:05:36.920 --> 0:05:38.960
<v Speaker 2>price out there of a of a million. This is

0:05:39.080 --> 0:05:42.360
<v Speaker 2>great story if everybody didn't see it about Mark McGuire's

0:05:42.400 --> 0:05:44.840
<v Speaker 2>home run ball where the guy that caught it, they

0:05:44.880 --> 0:05:47.520
<v Speaker 2>offered him all this stuff. Here's what I love about

0:05:47.560 --> 0:05:49.080
<v Speaker 2>this time of year because of getting these stories. And

0:05:49.120 --> 0:05:51.240
<v Speaker 2>they were saying this story about how you know, they

0:05:51.279 --> 0:05:53.960
<v Speaker 2>offered him like autograph, fat a ball, this, that and

0:05:54.000 --> 0:05:55.680
<v Speaker 2>the other thing, and he agreed to all of it

0:05:55.720 --> 0:05:57.640
<v Speaker 2>except his one other thing was he wanted to meet

0:05:57.680 --> 0:06:01.040
<v Speaker 2>Mark McGuire and McGuire said no, of course, of course,

0:06:01.520 --> 0:06:03.800
<v Speaker 2>and the guy ends up saying, okay, I'm not doing

0:06:03.800 --> 0:06:06.000
<v Speaker 2>it and sells the ball for three million dollars, you know,

0:06:06.040 --> 0:06:08.840
<v Speaker 2>like a couple months later and made millions. And there's

0:06:08.880 --> 0:06:11.920
<v Speaker 2>a lot of hostage negotiation stuff going on with these

0:06:11.960 --> 0:06:14.440
<v Speaker 2>home runs with between Judge and Albert Poolhols, and I

0:06:14.480 --> 0:06:18.400
<v Speaker 2>know we're currently in that with the with the pool

0:06:18.400 --> 0:06:19.440
<v Speaker 2>holes seven hundred seven.

0:06:19.640 --> 0:06:21.760
<v Speaker 4>I got a pretty cool story about this too.

0:06:21.880 --> 0:06:24.320
<v Speaker 3>So my dad was actually at the game where Roger

0:06:24.360 --> 0:06:26.760
<v Speaker 3>Marris hit his fifty fifth home run the year he

0:06:26.800 --> 0:06:29.800
<v Speaker 3>hit sixty one, and his bat broke after he hit

0:06:29.839 --> 0:06:32.200
<v Speaker 3>the home run and he handed it hit the bat

0:06:32.240 --> 0:06:34.159
<v Speaker 3>boy handed the bat to my dad. So my dad

0:06:34.240 --> 0:06:37.839
<v Speaker 3>has the bat that Roger Marris hit his fifty fifth

0:06:37.839 --> 0:06:40.800
<v Speaker 3>home run with, and he has the box he kept

0:06:40.839 --> 0:06:43.560
<v Speaker 3>scoring that game. So we actually went back and looked

0:06:43.600 --> 0:06:45.479
<v Speaker 3>to make sure it was the right game because he

0:06:45.600 --> 0:06:47.479
<v Speaker 3>was like because he hit the fifty sixth and the

0:06:47.480 --> 0:06:49.880
<v Speaker 3>fifty fifth both against Cleveland, so we're trying to make

0:06:49.920 --> 0:06:51.720
<v Speaker 3>sure it was the fifty fifth. So we went back

0:06:51.720 --> 0:06:54.279
<v Speaker 3>and watched the video and there's a there's a clip

0:06:54.360 --> 0:06:56.880
<v Speaker 3>of Roger Merris running into the dugout, and we froze

0:06:57.200 --> 0:06:59.680
<v Speaker 3>the YouTube and zoomed in and you can actually see

0:06:59.680 --> 0:07:02.839
<v Speaker 3>my dad in the second row behind the dugout at

0:07:02.880 --> 0:07:03.200
<v Speaker 3>the game.

0:07:03.240 --> 0:07:04.719
<v Speaker 1>So it's pretty got to authenticate that.

0:07:04.800 --> 0:07:07.200
<v Speaker 2>And that's your retirement plan, Yeah, right, which I had

0:07:07.240 --> 0:07:10.280
<v Speaker 2>a retirement plan like that. That's definitely pretty nice. And

0:07:10.320 --> 0:07:13.360
<v Speaker 2>then also it's all it's all enshrined in like this

0:07:13.760 --> 0:07:17.520
<v Speaker 2>hilarious conversation about chord cutting and how this game could

0:07:17.560 --> 0:07:20.400
<v Speaker 2>possibly you know, they could possibly do this on Apple TV.

0:07:20.560 --> 0:07:23.160
<v Speaker 2>You've got also the complaining going on in the NFL

0:07:23.240 --> 0:07:26.360
<v Speaker 2>about the NFL being on Amazon Prime in general and

0:07:26.400 --> 0:07:30.000
<v Speaker 2>maybe moving there. I don't think I think this is

0:07:30.000 --> 0:07:32.560
<v Speaker 2>the tip of the iceberg into this, and I know

0:07:32.600 --> 0:07:34.080
<v Speaker 2>over the last two years we've had it, it's a

0:07:34.120 --> 0:07:35.400
<v Speaker 2>much bigger, different conversation.

0:07:35.520 --> 0:07:37.520
<v Speaker 1>But you know a lot of people.

0:07:37.280 --> 0:07:39.800
<v Speaker 2>Got pissed off about like the YouTube games and the

0:07:39.800 --> 0:07:42.360
<v Speaker 2>Facebook games. We don't think we've seen anything yet. I

0:07:42.360 --> 0:07:44.680
<v Speaker 2>don't think we're this is the smallest little thing we're

0:07:44.720 --> 0:07:48.920
<v Speaker 2>in for. Because the chord cutting of streaming services purchasing

0:07:48.920 --> 0:07:50.920
<v Speaker 2>more games and more games, it's going to get louder

0:07:50.960 --> 0:07:53.680
<v Speaker 2>and bigger and it's going to be more intense. And

0:07:53.720 --> 0:07:56.000
<v Speaker 2>I think this is this is that little tip just

0:07:56.040 --> 0:07:59.040
<v Speaker 2>to remind us, like, look at you've got a really big,

0:07:59.080 --> 0:08:02.320
<v Speaker 2>big time you know, record breaking a baseball piece of

0:08:02.400 --> 0:08:05.080
<v Speaker 2>history that is stuck behind a paywall that most people

0:08:05.160 --> 0:08:07.200
<v Speaker 2>do not have. I think it's going to get worse.

0:08:07.240 --> 0:08:08.840
<v Speaker 2>I think it's gonna get a lot worse for people.

0:08:09.400 --> 0:08:11.880
<v Speaker 2>But again, that's a conversation for a whole nother day.

0:08:11.920 --> 0:08:14.480
<v Speaker 2>But congratulations to Albert Poolhols for doing it. We now

0:08:14.520 --> 0:08:17.360
<v Speaker 2>don't have to have the stupid conversation of like, would

0:08:17.360 --> 0:08:19.200
<v Speaker 2>he come back for a couple of games even though

0:08:19.240 --> 0:08:20.480
<v Speaker 2>he said he would and blah blah blah.

0:08:20.480 --> 0:08:21.440
<v Speaker 1>We don't have to worry about it.

0:08:21.480 --> 0:08:24.120
<v Speaker 2>He did it. He doesn't really even care. Someone's going

0:08:24.160 --> 0:08:26.240
<v Speaker 2>to be rich. I'm excited to see what the final

0:08:26.280 --> 0:08:29.160
<v Speaker 2>bit of the numbers are and maybe he can attack

0:08:29.200 --> 0:08:30.280
<v Speaker 2>on another too.

0:08:30.280 --> 0:08:32.040
<v Speaker 1>If he's even getting to play at this point.

0:08:32.080 --> 0:08:33.840
<v Speaker 2>If he hit the record, they might not, but you

0:08:33.840 --> 0:08:35.840
<v Speaker 2>know what are they playing for this last week? Some

0:08:35.880 --> 0:08:38.720
<v Speaker 2>other headline here pieces Ronald Acunya hit to go ahead

0:08:38.840 --> 0:08:41.559
<v Speaker 2>RBI single also walked on Sunday as the Braves beat

0:08:41.600 --> 0:08:44.120
<v Speaker 2>the Phillies eight to seven. I believe he had been

0:08:44.160 --> 0:08:47.080
<v Speaker 2>out of the lineup for quite some time and it's

0:08:47.120 --> 0:08:49.800
<v Speaker 2>going to be fascinating just to see where Acuna goes

0:08:49.840 --> 0:08:54.360
<v Speaker 2>next season. But getting Acunya, hopefully for this back end

0:08:54.400 --> 0:08:56.120
<v Speaker 2>of the week, is going to be a helpful piece

0:08:56.160 --> 0:08:59.520
<v Speaker 2>for everybody. Also, Mike Trout Homeward doubled twice walk and

0:08:59.520 --> 0:09:02.079
<v Speaker 2>also score three times for the Angels, say crush the

0:09:02.120 --> 0:09:05.800
<v Speaker 2>Twins ten to three on Sunday. And Mike Trout coming

0:09:05.840 --> 0:09:08.240
<v Speaker 2>through in this back half of like five months or

0:09:08.280 --> 0:09:11.720
<v Speaker 2>so with a little bit of production for any Roto Championships.

0:09:11.720 --> 0:09:14.560
<v Speaker 3>Andrew, Yeah, I mean he's a different player than he

0:09:14.720 --> 0:09:17.720
<v Speaker 3>was in his peak. You know, he doesn't steal bases anymore,

0:09:17.800 --> 0:09:21.200
<v Speaker 3>he doesn't hit three twenty anymore, but the power is

0:09:21.280 --> 0:09:24.200
<v Speaker 3>absolutely still there as much as ever, maybe more than ever.

0:09:25.160 --> 0:09:28.319
<v Speaker 3>So I wouldn't be surprised to see him continue that

0:09:28.440 --> 0:09:30.120
<v Speaker 3>for a few more years where he's putting up forty

0:09:30.160 --> 0:09:31.080
<v Speaker 3>home run seasons.

0:09:31.360 --> 0:09:33.600
<v Speaker 2>I wonder if this is gonna look reminiscent at all

0:09:33.720 --> 0:09:37.360
<v Speaker 2>of like this is his version of this where you've

0:09:37.360 --> 0:09:41.280
<v Speaker 2>got the pitchers. Verlander's gone through this Kershaw Bumgarner where

0:09:40.920 --> 0:09:44.600
<v Speaker 2>you are a certain type of player and then you

0:09:44.640 --> 0:09:47.840
<v Speaker 2>can no longer do that thing anymore, and you really

0:09:47.880 --> 0:09:50.920
<v Speaker 2>struggle with yourself in figuring out, well, I can't do this,

0:09:51.000 --> 0:09:53.360
<v Speaker 2>You're still trying to be the old player, and then

0:09:53.440 --> 0:09:56.360
<v Speaker 2>you find a way to work with where around it,

0:09:56.360 --> 0:09:58.920
<v Speaker 2>and I know I'm dancing around it, but like Kershaw

0:09:58.960 --> 0:10:01.200
<v Speaker 2>did that when he lost Villa, so he had to

0:10:01.280 --> 0:10:02.800
<v Speaker 2>learn and he was having back issues, he had to

0:10:02.880 --> 0:10:04.320
<v Speaker 2>learn to be a different pitcher.

0:10:04.679 --> 0:10:05.480
<v Speaker 1>Verlander had that.

0:10:05.520 --> 0:10:07.800
<v Speaker 2>But then Verlander found his velocity again, which is really

0:10:07.840 --> 0:10:10.600
<v Speaker 2>incredible at an older age. And the same thing I

0:10:10.720 --> 0:10:13.840
<v Speaker 2>kind of wonder with Trout where in twenty nineteen, you know,

0:10:13.880 --> 0:10:17.280
<v Speaker 2>he still stole double digit bases. He'd been coming off

0:10:17.320 --> 0:10:19.760
<v Speaker 2>of three straight years of twenty or more stolen bases,

0:10:19.800 --> 0:10:22.960
<v Speaker 2>and then you have the pandemic year that's mixed in

0:10:23.440 --> 0:10:26.240
<v Speaker 2>with a broken year of injuries in twenty twenty one

0:10:26.600 --> 0:10:28.000
<v Speaker 2>that I don't know if either one of those you

0:10:28.040 --> 0:10:31.240
<v Speaker 2>could really be like, oh, he is trying to find

0:10:31.320 --> 0:10:33.760
<v Speaker 2>himself in a different way. He is trying to reinvent

0:10:33.800 --> 0:10:35.920
<v Speaker 2>his game until this year because this is like the

0:10:35.920 --> 0:10:38.600
<v Speaker 2>first full season he's had since the pandemic really took

0:10:38.679 --> 0:10:40.840
<v Speaker 2>place that he's had to figure out how to be

0:10:40.880 --> 0:10:41.520
<v Speaker 2>a different player.

0:10:41.520 --> 0:10:43.680
<v Speaker 1>And we've kind of taken him and broken him.

0:10:43.559 --> 0:10:46.440
<v Speaker 2>Apart because the guy's only still four bases from two

0:10:46.480 --> 0:10:49.079
<v Speaker 2>thousand on four stolen bases from Mike Trout since two

0:10:49.160 --> 0:10:53.720
<v Speaker 2>thousand he's had and I think just overall, yeah, twosand

0:10:53.720 --> 0:10:55.439
<v Speaker 2>I'm sory, Yeah, two thousand would be that would be amazing.

0:10:55.480 --> 0:10:58.680
<v Speaker 2>He played in twenty eleven, twenty twenty, you've seen the

0:10:58.679 --> 0:11:01.240
<v Speaker 2>strikeout rate go up because I think you're seeing him

0:11:01.320 --> 0:11:04.240
<v Speaker 2>find you know, getting back onto being an impactful power

0:11:04.360 --> 0:11:06.800
<v Speaker 2>hitter is the way he's got to do it, instead

0:11:06.840 --> 0:11:09.439
<v Speaker 2>of being this five tool player that's also stealing basis.

0:11:09.480 --> 0:11:10.840
<v Speaker 1>That's just not part of his game anymore.

0:11:10.960 --> 0:11:12.400
<v Speaker 2>And we're going to have to come to terms that

0:11:12.840 --> 0:11:15.719
<v Speaker 2>maybe if he can find health and he can get

0:11:15.720 --> 0:11:17.640
<v Speaker 2>that going, he is going to be a plus plus

0:11:17.720 --> 0:11:18.760
<v Speaker 2>four category player.

0:11:18.800 --> 0:11:19.720
<v Speaker 1>He just will not be five.

0:11:20.400 --> 0:11:20.600
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:11:20.640 --> 0:11:23.480
<v Speaker 3>I mean, honestly, this is a pretty standard age curve

0:11:23.559 --> 0:11:26.040
<v Speaker 3>that you see with hitters. I feel like the power

0:11:26.120 --> 0:11:28.079
<v Speaker 3>is the thing that they can keep the longest. I

0:11:28.120 --> 0:11:30.160
<v Speaker 3>mean we even saw that with Albert Poohols, right, the

0:11:30.679 --> 0:11:33.840
<v Speaker 3>power maintained in those down years with the Angels. It

0:11:33.960 --> 0:11:37.319
<v Speaker 3>was the other things that went away, you know. I mean,

0:11:37.400 --> 0:11:39.600
<v Speaker 3>Trout is never going to be a batting average liability.

0:11:39.640 --> 0:11:44.040
<v Speaker 3>He's just too talented a hitter for that. But yeah,

0:11:44.080 --> 0:11:46.200
<v Speaker 3>the strikeout rate of twenty eight percent, I mean, you're

0:11:46.240 --> 0:11:48.760
<v Speaker 3>looking at a two eighty batting average like he's got

0:11:48.760 --> 0:11:52.040
<v Speaker 3>this year, that's kind of the baseline expectation. I just

0:11:52.080 --> 0:11:55.640
<v Speaker 3>find it interesting that pitchers actually seem to despite how

0:11:55.720 --> 0:11:57.440
<v Speaker 3>much stress there is on the arm and how many

0:11:57.440 --> 0:12:00.480
<v Speaker 3>injuries pitchers tend to have earlier in their careers. I

0:12:00.520 --> 0:12:03.520
<v Speaker 3>do think we see more dominance from older pitchers than

0:12:03.520 --> 0:12:06.360
<v Speaker 3>we do from older hitters. It's just hitters have a

0:12:06.360 --> 0:12:10.320
<v Speaker 3>more sort of graceful, gradual decline, whereas pitchers can fall

0:12:10.360 --> 0:12:12.520
<v Speaker 3>off a cliff, then they can re emerge and be

0:12:12.559 --> 0:12:15.680
<v Speaker 3>dominant again. It's sort of like capturing lightning in a

0:12:15.679 --> 0:12:18.640
<v Speaker 3>bottle with pictures, whereas with hitters it's kind of more

0:12:18.640 --> 0:12:21.040
<v Speaker 3>of a longer term trajectory.

0:12:20.800 --> 0:12:23.520
<v Speaker 2>Over on the In This League Fantasy Baseball podcast with

0:12:23.559 --> 0:12:26.679
<v Speaker 2>Bagman and I, we are conducting a slow draft, early

0:12:26.720 --> 0:12:29.400
<v Speaker 2>twenty twenty three draft, of course, and we're going to

0:12:29.440 --> 0:12:32.040
<v Speaker 2>be breaking it down this week. Where do you think

0:12:32.160 --> 0:12:34.319
<v Speaker 2>Trout should go and where do you think he went

0:12:34.360 --> 0:12:34.800
<v Speaker 2>in ours?

0:12:36.800 --> 0:12:40.679
<v Speaker 3>I would say Trout it is probably like a third

0:12:40.760 --> 0:12:44.720
<v Speaker 3>round player, maybe second if you want, but yeah, I

0:12:44.720 --> 0:12:49.280
<v Speaker 3>mean he's probably a top fifty overall player in Rodo

0:12:50.160 --> 0:12:53.000
<v Speaker 3>and he's got a very high floor. He's not risky

0:12:53.040 --> 0:12:55.520
<v Speaker 3>in any way other than of course he did have

0:12:55.760 --> 0:12:59.400
<v Speaker 3>some injuries, but generally speaking, I feel like he's kind

0:12:59.400 --> 0:13:01.720
<v Speaker 3>of like the rich man's George Springer at this point.

0:13:01.800 --> 0:13:05.600
<v Speaker 2>I feel like, so maybe surprise you. It's a fifteen

0:13:05.640 --> 0:13:09.600
<v Speaker 2>team roto mock draft ten. He went ten overall, so

0:13:09.960 --> 0:13:11.160
<v Speaker 2>still maintaining that value.

0:13:11.240 --> 0:13:12.200
<v Speaker 4>It's all rich for me.

0:13:12.679 --> 0:13:14.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean it is a little rich for me

0:13:14.160 --> 0:13:14.600
<v Speaker 1>as well.

0:13:16.240 --> 0:13:18.840
<v Speaker 2>And actually he went two picks before my pick, and

0:13:18.880 --> 0:13:20.400
<v Speaker 2>I still wouldn't have I don't think I would have

0:13:20.400 --> 0:13:20.800
<v Speaker 2>taken him.

0:13:20.840 --> 0:13:22.559
<v Speaker 1>I ended up going with a Bobby wit junior.

0:13:23.320 --> 0:13:25.880
<v Speaker 2>But I think there's a lot of stolen base guys

0:13:25.880 --> 0:13:28.080
<v Speaker 2>that are in there, but just interesting breakdown of like

0:13:28.200 --> 0:13:31.080
<v Speaker 2>where his value is still perceived to where he's going

0:13:31.120 --> 0:13:33.520
<v Speaker 2>to be drafted. He's literally almost being drafted in the

0:13:33.520 --> 0:13:36.040
<v Speaker 2>same spot he was preseason. So this is this is

0:13:36.040 --> 0:13:38.319
<v Speaker 2>why it's fascinating. And I think you can have Yeah,

0:13:38.400 --> 0:13:39.960
<v Speaker 2>doctor Glenn says, you can have him in the first

0:13:40.040 --> 0:13:43.559
<v Speaker 2>round he did go. I think he'll move further out

0:13:43.640 --> 0:13:44.560
<v Speaker 2>as time goes on.

0:13:45.480 --> 0:13:46.200
<v Speaker 1>Another guy that went in.

0:13:46.200 --> 0:13:48.200
<v Speaker 2>The first round of that many Machado hit his thirty

0:13:48.200 --> 0:13:50.600
<v Speaker 2>first homer of the year, also walked as the Padres

0:13:50.800 --> 0:13:53.160
<v Speaker 2>lost to the Rockies. Few other notes as were burning through.

0:13:53.400 --> 0:13:57.280
<v Speaker 2>Nester Cortes had six scoreless innings. Very impressive outing against

0:13:57.280 --> 0:13:59.960
<v Speaker 2>the Red Sox on Sunday night in New York at

0:14:00.320 --> 0:14:03.240
<v Speaker 2>four five with the two run homer. On Sunday as

0:14:03.240 --> 0:14:06.959
<v Speaker 2>the Mets beat the A's thirteen to four match, Schuzer

0:14:07.000 --> 0:14:10.160
<v Speaker 2>struck out seven walk nun allowed a loan run over

0:14:10.240 --> 0:14:14.280
<v Speaker 2>six innings against the A's and Dray Jamison Diamondbacks with

0:14:14.360 --> 0:14:18.040
<v Speaker 2>these young pitchers, dra Jamison didn't surrender a run over

0:14:18.200 --> 0:14:20.360
<v Speaker 2>five hits in five and one thirds of an inning

0:14:20.440 --> 0:14:23.560
<v Speaker 2>in a no decision against the Giants, Like incredibly impressive

0:14:23.600 --> 0:14:26.080
<v Speaker 2>between what Ryan Nelson has maintained to do and what

0:14:26.160 --> 0:14:28.560
<v Speaker 2>Dray Jamison is looking like right now. Probably back in

0:14:28.640 --> 0:14:31.040
<v Speaker 2>rotation guys that don't really mean much to you. You get

0:14:31.080 --> 0:14:33.120
<v Speaker 2>one start out of Dre Jamison if you want this week.

0:14:33.280 --> 0:14:35.920
<v Speaker 2>What I wanted to ask you real quick is next season,

0:14:36.560 --> 0:14:40.080
<v Speaker 2>Pete Alonso or Paul Goldschmid, who's the top first baseman

0:14:40.160 --> 0:14:40.720
<v Speaker 2>in your eyes?

0:14:42.680 --> 0:14:45.280
<v Speaker 3>Honestly, in a redraft format, I think you have to

0:14:45.280 --> 0:14:47.440
<v Speaker 3>give the edge to gold Schmith. Just based on what

0:14:47.920 --> 0:14:51.880
<v Speaker 3>he's done this season. I mean, it's just like Alonso.

0:14:52.080 --> 0:14:54.800
<v Speaker 3>The thing about Alonso is he's he's kind of like

0:14:54.880 --> 0:14:57.080
<v Speaker 3>Trout honestly at this you know, at this stage of

0:14:57.080 --> 0:15:00.360
<v Speaker 3>Trout's career, he's a lot like Alonzo. He's decent batting average,

0:15:00.360 --> 0:15:02.520
<v Speaker 3>but not going to excel there tons of power.

0:15:02.560 --> 0:15:03.600
<v Speaker 4>I would say Alonzo.

0:15:03.360 --> 0:15:06.560
<v Speaker 3>Has a little more power even than Trout, but not

0:15:06.640 --> 0:15:10.080
<v Speaker 3>really much in the stolen bases category. So you're you're

0:15:10.120 --> 0:15:13.200
<v Speaker 3>talking like a three category, three and a half category

0:15:13.280 --> 0:15:16.760
<v Speaker 3>kind of a player, whereas, uh, with gold Schmidt, I mean,

0:15:17.080 --> 0:15:21.080
<v Speaker 3>he's just done it all this year. So you know, certainly,

0:15:21.200 --> 0:15:24.320
<v Speaker 3>like I could see the argument for Alonso just because like,

0:15:24.480 --> 0:15:27.520
<v Speaker 3>if anything, he could even get a little bit better perhaps,

0:15:27.560 --> 0:15:30.200
<v Speaker 3>and this has got to be the best we could

0:15:30.200 --> 0:15:31.400
<v Speaker 3>see from gold Shmate at this year.

0:15:31.440 --> 0:15:34.240
<v Speaker 2>It'd be this whole Like, I don't want to buy

0:15:34.360 --> 0:15:36.640
<v Speaker 2>last year's stats with Goldman, he didn't make it into

0:15:36.680 --> 0:15:38.080
<v Speaker 2>the first runt of our mock, but he did go

0:15:38.120 --> 0:15:40.720
<v Speaker 2>before pet Alan. So I think it's an interesting conversation

0:15:40.800 --> 0:15:43.200
<v Speaker 2>to have with those guys that first base has gotten

0:15:43.200 --> 0:15:45.120
<v Speaker 2>a little bit more stocked up and we actually have

0:15:45.160 --> 0:15:47.280
<v Speaker 2>elite players where I feel like, I don't know, kind

0:15:47.280 --> 0:15:49.360
<v Speaker 2>of like lack the eliteness. Maybe we would throw Freddy

0:15:49.360 --> 0:15:51.640
<v Speaker 2>Freeman into that, and Freeman's not even going in the

0:15:51.680 --> 0:15:52.120
<v Speaker 2>top two.

0:15:52.240 --> 0:15:53.880
<v Speaker 3>But it's a lot of Yeah, I think, I just

0:15:53.920 --> 0:15:57.120
<v Speaker 3>truly I think, I like I had a point earlier

0:15:57.120 --> 0:15:58.880
<v Speaker 3>in this season where I thought gold Schmidt was going

0:15:58.920 --> 0:16:01.960
<v Speaker 3>to fall off and then he did so based on that,

0:16:02.040 --> 0:16:04.000
<v Speaker 3>I'm not ready to just assume he's suddenly going to

0:16:04.040 --> 0:16:05.160
<v Speaker 3>fall off next April.

0:16:05.480 --> 0:16:06.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:16:06.240 --> 0:16:09.160
<v Speaker 2>Over on the injury front, Jeremy Paania cleared concussion protocol

0:16:09.200 --> 0:16:12.400
<v Speaker 2>after having sustaining a head injury on Sunday. He's expected

0:16:12.440 --> 0:16:14.600
<v Speaker 2>to be available on Tuesday. Short slight to games here

0:16:14.640 --> 0:16:17.400
<v Speaker 2>on Monday. Dustin May was placed on the fifteen day IL.

0:16:17.480 --> 0:16:20.280
<v Speaker 2>Dave Roberts stated that he could possibly be available out

0:16:20.320 --> 0:16:22.640
<v Speaker 2>of the bullpen for the postseason if he's healthy enough.

0:16:22.680 --> 0:16:24.960
<v Speaker 2>But for re Drafters, we know you have nothing to

0:16:24.960 --> 0:16:28.520
<v Speaker 2>worry about. Edward Cabrera left Sunday start with a right

0:16:28.600 --> 0:16:31.480
<v Speaker 2>ankle sprain. No bueno if you're counting on him. Jesse

0:16:31.520 --> 0:16:33.680
<v Speaker 2>Winker is removed from Sunday's game with a bruce left wrist,

0:16:33.680 --> 0:16:36.320
<v Speaker 2>but fantasy owners wouldn't have known it outside of not

0:16:36.320 --> 0:16:38.680
<v Speaker 2>getting an zero for four with two strikeout performance on

0:16:38.720 --> 0:16:41.600
<v Speaker 2>their card for him. Cal Raley left Sunday's game after

0:16:41.600 --> 0:16:44.400
<v Speaker 2>aggravating an existing thumb injury, and Wander Franco was removed

0:16:44.440 --> 0:16:46.800
<v Speaker 2>from Sunday's game with a hand injury.

0:16:46.880 --> 0:16:51.240
<v Speaker 1>So no bueno. The injuries have stacked up for wander Franco.

0:16:51.520 --> 0:16:52.520
<v Speaker 1>This is an interesting question.

0:16:52.600 --> 0:16:56.840
<v Speaker 2>You just put together your final Waiver wire pickup article

0:16:56.880 --> 0:16:59.560
<v Speaker 2>which is over on Fantasy Pros, and I figure maybe

0:16:59.560 --> 0:17:01.000
<v Speaker 2>if there's a few of these wee can answer these

0:17:01.040 --> 0:17:04.520
<v Speaker 2>throughout the show. I would love to get your thoughts

0:17:04.520 --> 0:17:06.240
<v Speaker 2>on a couple of the hitters. Well, let's do that first,

0:17:06.440 --> 0:17:08.359
<v Speaker 2>a couple of hitters that you targeted as far as

0:17:08.400 --> 0:17:10.840
<v Speaker 2>pickups for this final week. If you're going for most

0:17:10.880 --> 0:17:12.560
<v Speaker 2>likely head to head is not playing. If you are,

0:17:12.920 --> 0:17:17.120
<v Speaker 2>you're crazy. But Roto championships are on the line right now.

0:17:17.160 --> 0:17:18.640
<v Speaker 2>Who are a couple of the hitter pickups?

0:17:18.640 --> 0:17:21.320
<v Speaker 1>If someone is making some last desperation moves this week.

0:17:21.680 --> 0:17:24.680
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so, as we talked about last week, Ezekiel Tovar

0:17:25.160 --> 0:17:27.679
<v Speaker 3>has to be at the top of that list just

0:17:27.760 --> 0:17:29.800
<v Speaker 3>with the potential that he has. But I will just

0:17:29.880 --> 0:17:33.080
<v Speaker 3>caution that the Rockies just finished up their final home

0:17:33.119 --> 0:17:35.960
<v Speaker 3>stand of the season, so you're going to be getting

0:17:36.040 --> 0:17:37.760
<v Speaker 3>him on the road, I believe, against the Dodgers and

0:17:37.760 --> 0:17:41.600
<v Speaker 3>Padres the last week, so not the same kind of

0:17:41.680 --> 0:17:44.000
<v Speaker 3>hitting environments that he's going to enjoy next year. But

0:17:44.280 --> 0:17:47.679
<v Speaker 3>I still think he can provide some instant speed.

0:17:47.720 --> 0:17:48.400
<v Speaker 4>He's got a.

0:17:48.359 --> 0:17:51.960
<v Speaker 3>Pretty good played approach for a player that's just coming up,

0:17:52.600 --> 0:17:54.320
<v Speaker 3>and so I think he can hold his own in

0:17:54.320 --> 0:17:54.919
<v Speaker 3>batting average.

0:17:54.960 --> 0:17:56.920
<v Speaker 4>And Steel's power still developing.

0:17:57.640 --> 0:18:00.560
<v Speaker 3>Josh Donaldson, I mean, we're talking about these old players,

0:18:00.960 --> 0:18:03.880
<v Speaker 3>and he's been hitting really well lately. You know, he's

0:18:03.880 --> 0:18:06.320
<v Speaker 3>had a ton of injuries over the recent years. He's

0:18:06.359 --> 0:18:09.359
<v Speaker 3>thirty six years old now, but he's hitting in a

0:18:09.359 --> 0:18:12.640
<v Speaker 3>great lineup with the Yankees, and he's swinging hop out

0:18:12.720 --> 0:18:14.680
<v Speaker 3>right now. So as long as he's in the lineup, go.

0:18:14.920 --> 0:18:16.359
<v Speaker 3>You gotta make sure he's in the lineup. But I

0:18:16.400 --> 0:18:18.919
<v Speaker 3>think he's a good plug and play option. And then

0:18:19.000 --> 0:18:22.320
<v Speaker 3>Hunter Green on the pitching side, you know, he had

0:18:22.359 --> 0:18:24.399
<v Speaker 3>some ups and downs earlier in the year, which is

0:18:24.680 --> 0:18:27.119
<v Speaker 3>to be expected from a twenty three year old in

0:18:27.200 --> 0:18:29.840
<v Speaker 3>his first major league season, but then he missed six

0:18:29.880 --> 0:18:33.000
<v Speaker 3>weeks with a strange shoulder in August in early September,

0:18:33.119 --> 0:18:34.200
<v Speaker 3>and ever since he's come.

0:18:34.040 --> 0:18:35.720
<v Speaker 4>Back, he's looked really, really good.

0:18:36.240 --> 0:18:39.320
<v Speaker 3>We know, he throws insane gas over he had the

0:18:39.320 --> 0:18:41.600
<v Speaker 3>most one hundred mile per hour pitches in a game

0:18:42.160 --> 0:18:46.640
<v Speaker 3>in the pitch tracking era recent outing, and he gets

0:18:46.680 --> 0:18:49.399
<v Speaker 3>the Pirates tomorrow, so that's about as good as it gets.

0:18:49.680 --> 0:18:52.080
<v Speaker 2>Well, actually, funny enough, that was a question that we

0:18:52.160 --> 0:18:53.920
<v Speaker 2>got from Ray made the finals.

0:18:53.960 --> 0:18:56.280
<v Speaker 1>Would you drop Pablo Lopez for Hunter Green?

0:18:56.280 --> 0:18:58.720
<v Speaker 2>A lot of positive Hunter Green talk in the chat

0:18:58.760 --> 0:19:01.080
<v Speaker 2>going on right now as well.

0:19:01.640 --> 0:19:03.560
<v Speaker 3>I got to look at how Pablo Lopez is set

0:19:03.600 --> 0:19:05.320
<v Speaker 3>up so he gets the nets. Yeah, I mean that's

0:19:05.440 --> 0:19:08.879
<v Speaker 3>that's kind of a tough outing. I mean, he's mostly

0:19:08.920 --> 0:19:13.159
<v Speaker 3>still maintained what he's doing, so you know, I would

0:19:13.200 --> 0:19:15.359
<v Speaker 3>be happy to use Pablo Lopez in that start. But

0:19:15.440 --> 0:19:18.640
<v Speaker 3>if it's a choice between the two, yeah, I think

0:19:18.640 --> 0:19:19.880
<v Speaker 3>I might actually go with Green.

0:19:20.320 --> 0:19:21.880
<v Speaker 1>And if you guys got any other questions, feel free

0:19:21.920 --> 0:19:22.320
<v Speaker 1>to drop them.

0:19:22.400 --> 0:19:23.600
<v Speaker 2>We might try to hit those at the end of

0:19:23.640 --> 0:19:26.280
<v Speaker 2>the show. As far as this week and you crazy people,

0:19:26.400 --> 0:19:29.160
<v Speaker 2>Doctor Glenn I got head to head championships in two

0:19:29.200 --> 0:19:32.720
<v Speaker 2>leagues this week. Come on Welsh, No, come on you

0:19:32.840 --> 0:19:35.960
<v Speaker 2>doctor Glenn. You guys playing head to head into the final.

0:19:36.000 --> 0:19:38.760
<v Speaker 2>I just I'm so adamantly not a final week guy.

0:19:38.760 --> 0:19:40.960
<v Speaker 2>It is different, of course, it's a different world of

0:19:41.000 --> 0:19:41.760
<v Speaker 2>non forty mans.

0:19:41.800 --> 0:19:43.240
<v Speaker 1>I still just don't like it, but I get it.

0:19:43.280 --> 0:19:45.960
<v Speaker 1>I get it. I'm just surprised. I think Gokard said

0:19:46.000 --> 0:19:46.320
<v Speaker 1>the same thing.

0:19:46.359 --> 0:19:49.760
<v Speaker 2>I'm surprised you guys have a lot of these head

0:19:49.760 --> 0:19:51.040
<v Speaker 2>to heads going to the final week.

0:19:51.080 --> 0:19:53.280
<v Speaker 1>But like Walky said, maybe it's like this I did thing.

0:19:53.320 --> 0:19:54.560
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I did want to say in the column.

0:19:54.600 --> 0:19:56.640
<v Speaker 3>I also just talked a little bit of kind of

0:19:56.840 --> 0:19:59.720
<v Speaker 3>broader advice, and it's just we have to remember at

0:19:59.760 --> 0:20:02.320
<v Speaker 3>this point in the season the things we're looking for.

0:20:02.400 --> 0:20:04.480
<v Speaker 3>I mean, we're looking for hitters who are literally on

0:20:04.520 --> 0:20:07.359
<v Speaker 3>a hot streak right now. It doesn't matter how they've

0:20:07.400 --> 0:20:09.879
<v Speaker 3>done all season. And we are looking for pitchers who

0:20:09.920 --> 0:20:13.280
<v Speaker 3>have good spots starts lined up right now. It doesn't

0:20:13.320 --> 0:20:15.080
<v Speaker 3>matter if they've had their ups and downs and been

0:20:15.160 --> 0:20:16.840
<v Speaker 3>inconsistent over the course of the year.

0:20:17.200 --> 0:20:19.240
<v Speaker 4>So you know, it's really.

0:20:20.520 --> 0:20:23.639
<v Speaker 3>At this point saves and steals like those are things

0:20:23.720 --> 0:20:26.199
<v Speaker 3>like that could just be freely sitting out there and

0:20:26.240 --> 0:20:28.560
<v Speaker 3>can make a real difference, Like you can just pick

0:20:28.560 --> 0:20:30.600
<v Speaker 3>a guy up and win a category. Those kind of

0:20:30.600 --> 0:20:33.560
<v Speaker 3>players have extra value right now. So we really just

0:20:33.600 --> 0:20:36.119
<v Speaker 3>have to simplify our approach at this point this season.

0:20:36.240 --> 0:20:39.439
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it is a complete just break your mind and

0:20:39.520 --> 0:20:41.600
<v Speaker 2>just cut and go as you need to. This is

0:20:41.640 --> 0:20:45.160
<v Speaker 2>a fun fact in the from Jeremy Frank, who I've

0:20:45.200 --> 0:20:47.119
<v Speaker 2>done a couple panels with Jeremy Frank before, like at

0:20:47.119 --> 0:20:48.040
<v Speaker 2>Pitchcon and stuff.

0:20:48.080 --> 0:20:48.640
<v Speaker 1>He's a good guy.

0:20:48.760 --> 0:20:52.720
<v Speaker 2>MLB random Stats is a Twitter follow Albert Poolhol's average

0:20:52.760 --> 0:20:55.920
<v Speaker 2>home run trot over the years has been tracked by

0:20:56.000 --> 0:20:59.800
<v Speaker 2>stat Cast is twenty six seconds, so putting that over

0:20:59.880 --> 0:21:03.720
<v Speaker 2>as full career, Jeremy Frank tweets that Pool also spent

0:21:03.920 --> 0:21:07.960
<v Speaker 2>just over five hours of his life running the bases

0:21:08.440 --> 0:21:11.639
<v Speaker 2>after hitting a home run, which is a phenomenal stack,

0:21:11.840 --> 0:21:13.200
<v Speaker 2>phenomenal stack, five.

0:21:13.000 --> 0:21:13.919
<v Speaker 1>Hours of running.

0:21:14.119 --> 0:21:17.320
<v Speaker 2>What I'm looking for will be the one person on

0:21:17.359 --> 0:21:20.359
<v Speaker 2>the internet that will do this, that will pull every

0:21:20.400 --> 0:21:23.600
<v Speaker 2>single trot and all five hours of those trots.

0:21:23.280 --> 0:21:26.040
<v Speaker 1>And put it into one YouTube video. Oh yeah, it'll

0:21:26.040 --> 0:21:27.800
<v Speaker 1>be there, you know, the Grand Opus.

0:21:27.840 --> 0:21:31.280
<v Speaker 2>It'll be the greatest thing that's ever five hours of

0:21:31.359 --> 0:21:34.720
<v Speaker 2>Albert pool Holes Trots. I'm looking for someone tag me

0:21:34.760 --> 0:21:36.399
<v Speaker 2>and tweet me when it actually happens.

0:21:36.600 --> 0:21:37.359
<v Speaker 4>That's very meta.

0:21:37.520 --> 0:21:39.240
<v Speaker 3>I feel like I'll just be like in a state

0:21:39.280 --> 0:21:40.320
<v Speaker 3>of peace when I'm watching that.

0:21:40.760 --> 0:21:41.680
<v Speaker 1>I totally agree.

0:21:41.720 --> 0:21:43.760
<v Speaker 2>It's like, you know what you ever like put on YouTube,

0:21:43.800 --> 0:21:45.879
<v Speaker 2>like they have those like looped music channels, and you

0:21:45.920 --> 0:21:47.320
<v Speaker 2>just sit there and you like, that'll be it.

0:21:47.320 --> 0:21:52.200
<v Speaker 1>It'll just be like ever pool Boom just walk and

0:21:52.359 --> 0:21:54.400
<v Speaker 1>you just go to sleep to five hours of pool

0:21:54.400 --> 0:21:55.280
<v Speaker 1>Holes Trots. I think that.

0:21:55.359 --> 0:21:58.159
<v Speaker 2>I think that's incredible. I really Abso let's go over

0:21:58.200 --> 0:22:00.960
<v Speaker 2>to some stat heroes here. Petlanz four for five with

0:22:01.000 --> 0:22:04.159
<v Speaker 2>a homer five RBIs. We talked about him on Sunday.

0:22:04.160 --> 0:22:07.240
<v Speaker 2>Stephen Kwan, who I've been just having a lot of

0:22:07.280 --> 0:22:09.760
<v Speaker 2>conversation about Stephen Kwan and how bad it was to

0:22:09.840 --> 0:22:12.200
<v Speaker 2>start or good it was, and then it just tabled

0:22:12.200 --> 0:22:15.560
<v Speaker 2>off for so long, really quietly putting together the counting

0:22:15.600 --> 0:22:17.960
<v Speaker 2>stats that we dreamed of that he could put together.

0:22:18.000 --> 0:22:19.159
<v Speaker 2>And he, like I said, I think I said this

0:22:19.200 --> 0:22:21.000
<v Speaker 2>in the show last week. He's no longer a one

0:22:21.000 --> 0:22:23.480
<v Speaker 2>category player. He's a three category player, which really makes

0:22:23.520 --> 0:22:25.679
<v Speaker 2>him more serviceable and He had a combo meal over

0:22:25.680 --> 0:22:28.920
<v Speaker 2>the week in a homer, two stolen bases, five RBI,

0:22:29.280 --> 0:22:31.840
<v Speaker 2>going three for five with a couple of runs. Any

0:22:31.880 --> 0:22:34.119
<v Speaker 2>thoughts on Kwan moving forward? I mean, this is one

0:22:34.119 --> 0:22:36.080
<v Speaker 2>of those guys that hopefully preemptive moves.

0:22:36.119 --> 0:22:37.919
<v Speaker 1>If he was dropped, you were able to jump on.

0:22:38.080 --> 0:22:41.280
<v Speaker 1>But are you going to be in on Kwan next year? Yeah?

0:22:41.320 --> 0:22:41.720
<v Speaker 4>I think so.

0:22:41.840 --> 0:22:44.000
<v Speaker 3>I think he's like one of those players that it

0:22:44.200 --> 0:22:46.679
<v Speaker 3>will probably still be a little bit underrated, just because

0:22:47.720 --> 0:22:50.000
<v Speaker 3>you know, when they say chicks dig the long ball,

0:22:50.280 --> 0:22:52.800
<v Speaker 3>everyone digs the long ball, you know. So the fact

0:22:52.840 --> 0:22:54.439
<v Speaker 3>that he's I mean, he has hit a couple this

0:22:54.560 --> 0:22:57.560
<v Speaker 3>last week, so that's nice to see. Maybe over next

0:22:57.600 --> 0:22:59.119
<v Speaker 3>season he could at least get in that ten to

0:22:59.160 --> 0:23:01.960
<v Speaker 3>fifteen home runner, which would be a huge plus. But

0:23:02.280 --> 0:23:03.879
<v Speaker 3>as we said on last week's show, even if he

0:23:03.920 --> 0:23:06.040
<v Speaker 3>doesn't do that, I mean, the fact that he's now

0:23:06.080 --> 0:23:08.399
<v Speaker 3>stealing bases at a high clip. We know he's one

0:23:08.440 --> 0:23:10.640
<v Speaker 3>of the better bets for batting average in all of baseball,

0:23:11.040 --> 0:23:12.800
<v Speaker 3>and he's gonna score a lot of runs in that

0:23:13.200 --> 0:23:14.000
<v Speaker 3>Guardians lineup.

0:23:14.080 --> 0:23:14.920
<v Speaker 4>So yeah, I mean, I.

0:23:14.840 --> 0:23:17.000
<v Speaker 3>Feel like he's one of those players that like people

0:23:17.040 --> 0:23:19.200
<v Speaker 3>are not going to be excited to draft, but you're

0:23:19.200 --> 0:23:22.080
<v Speaker 3>gonna look at the end of season where did they finish,

0:23:22.080 --> 0:23:24.200
<v Speaker 3>And he's probably gonna sneak his way into the top

0:23:24.240 --> 0:23:24.919
<v Speaker 3>one hundred or.

0:23:24.920 --> 0:23:25.399
<v Speaker 1>Something like that.

0:23:25.440 --> 0:23:27.359
<v Speaker 2>Those Guardians always have the guys, you know, like I

0:23:27.400 --> 0:23:29.240
<v Speaker 2>don't get any type of w on this.

0:23:30.280 --> 0:23:31.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean, if there's anything I'm.

0:23:31.840 --> 0:23:34.359
<v Speaker 2>Really bad at, he's like the bold predictions because I'll

0:23:34.400 --> 0:23:36.840
<v Speaker 2>just go off table and then if you look back

0:23:36.880 --> 0:23:39.240
<v Speaker 2>on them, they just don't play like my home run one.

0:23:39.359 --> 0:23:42.080
<v Speaker 2>But you know, like I just get like lost in

0:23:42.119 --> 0:23:44.080
<v Speaker 2>those Guardians players, and you look at him and Rosario,

0:23:44.080 --> 0:23:46.480
<v Speaker 2>who's one of my bold predictions. He's not gonna do

0:23:46.520 --> 0:23:48.480
<v Speaker 2>the twenty twenty season, but he's just one of those

0:23:48.480 --> 0:23:51.000
<v Speaker 2>guys like he has a like eleven homer, seventeen stolen bases,

0:23:51.040 --> 0:23:53.919
<v Speaker 2>good batting average. He's actually kind of sneinky in you know,

0:23:53.920 --> 0:23:56.200
<v Speaker 2>putting together. You know, I think I was even hoping

0:23:56.200 --> 0:23:58.600
<v Speaker 2>maybe a fifteen homer, twenty five stolen base. There's just

0:23:58.640 --> 0:24:03.679
<v Speaker 2>so many bases to be stolen on that Teamjmenez.

0:24:02.160 --> 0:24:05.480
<v Speaker 1>And Kwan and Straw. That just gets me excited.

0:24:05.480 --> 0:24:07.400
<v Speaker 2>I'm probably always going to have some type of love

0:24:07.440 --> 0:24:09.359
<v Speaker 2>for any of those players, and Kwan is going to

0:24:09.359 --> 0:24:11.639
<v Speaker 2>be one of those next year where you know, the

0:24:11.640 --> 0:24:14.960
<v Speaker 2>the adding in your rookie season of this type accounting

0:24:15.000 --> 0:24:17.640
<v Speaker 2>stats leaves a lot out there that like what if,

0:24:17.760 --> 0:24:19.640
<v Speaker 2>what if Stephen Kwan ended up being like a low

0:24:19.720 --> 0:24:22.840
<v Speaker 2>key Whit Maryfield. I mean, statistically he almost looks better

0:24:22.840 --> 0:24:25.680
<v Speaker 2>than Maryfield this year. Maryfield's home run totals not high

0:24:25.880 --> 0:24:27.919
<v Speaker 2>stolen base number. I think Kwan is now has more

0:24:27.960 --> 0:24:30.840
<v Speaker 2>stolen bases than him that I wouldn't be surprised if

0:24:30.840 --> 0:24:33.920
<v Speaker 2>we're valuing Kwan over Whit Maryfield into next year or something.

0:24:33.920 --> 0:24:34.880
<v Speaker 1>To consider some.

0:24:34.800 --> 0:24:37.199
<v Speaker 2>Other of these stat heroes, George Springer had two homers,

0:24:37.240 --> 0:24:41.080
<v Speaker 2>Kyle Schwarber two bombs with his two four batting average

0:24:41.119 --> 0:24:42.840
<v Speaker 2>or whatever it is. Mike Trout had a homer, as

0:24:42.840 --> 0:24:44.760
<v Speaker 2>we mentioned, JD. Davis went four for five with a

0:24:44.800 --> 0:24:48.399
<v Speaker 2>home run. Shout out to piece of PA. Brandon Drury

0:24:48.480 --> 0:24:50.399
<v Speaker 2>two for five with a homer two RBIs actually just

0:24:50.440 --> 0:24:53.200
<v Speaker 2>took him in our slow mock draft. Will Myers had

0:24:53.200 --> 0:24:55.640
<v Speaker 2>a homer, and C. J. Abrams went three for four

0:24:55.680 --> 0:24:57.800
<v Speaker 2>with a couple stolen bases. In that regular playing time

0:24:57.880 --> 0:25:01.000
<v Speaker 2>and Michael Massey with a homer, four our bi and

0:25:01.080 --> 0:25:03.119
<v Speaker 2>two runs. Do you find yourself at all are you

0:25:03.200 --> 0:25:05.240
<v Speaker 2>going to hold back on some of the rookie hype

0:25:05.240 --> 0:25:05.600
<v Speaker 2>next year.

0:25:05.600 --> 0:25:07.640
<v Speaker 1>I was just thinking about that with CJ. Abrams. He's

0:25:07.680 --> 0:25:09.360
<v Speaker 1>a fascinating case to talk about in the.

0:25:09.280 --> 0:25:12.760
<v Speaker 2>Offseason, but there are so many of these young players

0:25:12.760 --> 0:25:14.800
<v Speaker 2>that are going to now be given the full reigns

0:25:14.920 --> 0:25:16.560
<v Speaker 2>and so many of these players that are going to

0:25:16.600 --> 0:25:18.480
<v Speaker 2>be thrust into it to the beginning of the year.

0:25:18.720 --> 0:25:19.520
<v Speaker 1>Do you think you're going to be.

0:25:19.520 --> 0:25:23.520
<v Speaker 2>A heavy buyer on rookie or sophomore ish type of

0:25:23.560 --> 0:25:26.600
<v Speaker 2>seasons like the CJ. Abrams or paying for some of

0:25:26.600 --> 0:25:28.199
<v Speaker 2>the rookies that are going to have high costs.

0:25:29.080 --> 0:25:29.720
<v Speaker 4>Well, I don't want to.

0:25:29.760 --> 0:25:32.639
<v Speaker 3>I don't want to overpay for them at the draft table,

0:25:33.080 --> 0:25:35.520
<v Speaker 3>but I will definitely always be in on rookies because

0:25:36.000 --> 0:25:39.600
<v Speaker 3>the plus the upside is so high. I mean, you

0:25:39.600 --> 0:25:41.480
<v Speaker 3>can talk about all the rookies that failed this year,

0:25:41.480 --> 0:25:43.920
<v Speaker 3>but you could also talk about Bobby with Junior or

0:25:44.000 --> 0:25:47.240
<v Speaker 3>Julio Rodriguez Michael Harris. I mean those guys were legitimate

0:25:47.320 --> 0:25:48.159
<v Speaker 3>league winning.

0:25:48.000 --> 0:25:48.880
<v Speaker 4>Type of stripers.

0:25:48.880 --> 0:25:50.520
<v Speaker 1>People forget st with Strider.

0:25:50.640 --> 0:25:52.160
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, exactly the rookie.

0:25:52.240 --> 0:25:55.000
<v Speaker 3>So yeah, yeah, So, I mean the upside is massive

0:25:55.000 --> 0:25:58.280
<v Speaker 3>with these rookies. It's very common to see a few

0:25:58.359 --> 0:26:02.200
<v Speaker 3>every year step right up and be you know, first round,

0:26:02.240 --> 0:26:06.680
<v Speaker 3>second round talent producers right away. So yeah, maybe eighty

0:26:06.720 --> 0:26:08.720
<v Speaker 3>percent of them are going to struggle and you just

0:26:08.800 --> 0:26:09.119
<v Speaker 3>move on.

0:26:09.320 --> 0:26:12.320
<v Speaker 4>But that's I feel like that's the way.

0:26:12.119 --> 0:26:15.359
<v Speaker 3>To manage a fantasy baseball team is at least if

0:26:15.400 --> 0:26:17.600
<v Speaker 3>you have bench spots to work with, you know, put

0:26:17.640 --> 0:26:20.320
<v Speaker 3>guys on your bench that have that upside, and rookies

0:26:20.359 --> 0:26:22.280
<v Speaker 3>are the guys that have that upside for sure.

0:26:22.359 --> 0:26:25.200
<v Speaker 2>Pitchers on the positive side, Christian Javier struck out eight

0:26:25.240 --> 0:26:27.280
<v Speaker 2>over six, a lot of just guys that went six.

0:26:27.359 --> 0:26:30.159
<v Speaker 2>Nister Cortes give up only one hit over six, striking

0:26:30.160 --> 0:26:33.040
<v Speaker 2>out five, Dylan Cees a low strikeout total.

0:26:33.080 --> 0:26:36.960
<v Speaker 1>We're not used to that. Six innings, three walks, five strikeouts.

0:26:37.000 --> 0:26:39.399
<v Speaker 2>Sureser struck out seven, as we mentioned, And another one

0:26:39.440 --> 0:26:43.040
<v Speaker 2>of those rookies that I actually also drafted him in

0:26:43.080 --> 0:26:46.760
<v Speaker 2>our early redraft was Nicolodolo, who went six, struck out six,

0:26:46.800 --> 0:26:49.600
<v Speaker 2>and has been a strikeout monster this entire year. He's

0:26:49.600 --> 0:26:52.760
<v Speaker 2>been really phenomenal on the zeros. Austin Riley went one

0:26:52.880 --> 0:26:55.800
<v Speaker 2>for six yesterday with four strikeouts, Gonner Henderson oh for

0:26:55.880 --> 0:26:58.800
<v Speaker 2>four with four ks, Still a little volatility there, Juli

0:26:58.840 --> 0:27:02.080
<v Speaker 2>gariel O for five three k's, David Palta and Jose

0:27:02.280 --> 0:27:05.000
<v Speaker 2>Ramirez both with three k's no hits over the weekend.

0:27:05.119 --> 0:27:09.840
<v Speaker 2>On the pitcher bluch side killing you going into your

0:27:09.840 --> 0:27:11.800
<v Speaker 2>final week if you had a few of these, and

0:27:11.840 --> 0:27:15.000
<v Speaker 2>there's a few you would have had. Kyle Frielan couldn't

0:27:15.000 --> 0:27:17.720
<v Speaker 2>get to the third inning, giving up seven earned runs.

0:27:17.840 --> 0:27:21.080
<v Speaker 2>JP Sears hopefully you weren't streaming six earn runs and

0:27:21.119 --> 0:27:21.920
<v Speaker 2>three and two third.

0:27:21.960 --> 0:27:23.600
<v Speaker 1>Max Castillo gave.

0:27:23.520 --> 0:27:26.800
<v Speaker 2>Up six earned runs, Mike Clevenger four innings, eight hits,

0:27:26.880 --> 0:27:30.280
<v Speaker 2>five earned runs only, while Allie struck out two, Dylan

0:27:30.320 --> 0:27:32.880
<v Speaker 2>Bundy didn't get to the fourth, give up four earned runs,

0:27:32.960 --> 0:27:37.040
<v Speaker 2>Charlie Morton six earned runs, and Adam Waynwright only got

0:27:37.080 --> 0:27:39.800
<v Speaker 2>to the third, striking out one, walking three and giving

0:27:39.880 --> 0:27:43.280
<v Speaker 2>up four earned runs. Did you get smashed by any

0:27:43.320 --> 0:27:45.560
<v Speaker 2>of these guys going into this final week that you're

0:27:45.560 --> 0:27:46.760
<v Speaker 2>trying to recover from?

0:27:47.000 --> 0:27:48.120
<v Speaker 4>I did not, Thankfully.

0:27:48.200 --> 0:27:50.960
<v Speaker 3>I had Clevenger for big chunks of this season, but

0:27:51.040 --> 0:27:54.080
<v Speaker 3>I noticed that his strikeout rate had tailed off since

0:27:54.119 --> 0:27:56.080
<v Speaker 3>before the injury, so I felt like that was kind

0:27:56.119 --> 0:27:58.320
<v Speaker 3>of a warning sign, and when he started hitting some

0:27:58.359 --> 0:28:01.000
<v Speaker 3>bumps in the road, I moved on from him pretty quickly,

0:28:01.040 --> 0:28:03.560
<v Speaker 3>pretty proactively, And I'm glad that I did, because four

0:28:03.560 --> 0:28:06.320
<v Speaker 3>of his last five starts have been really bad, so

0:28:06.359 --> 0:28:08.919
<v Speaker 3>hopefully no one had them and had him in their

0:28:08.960 --> 0:28:11.200
<v Speaker 3>lineups at this point. And then Morton, I have to say,

0:28:11.359 --> 0:28:13.840
<v Speaker 3>He's a guy I've always loved, always been very high on,

0:28:14.680 --> 0:28:17.159
<v Speaker 3>but thankfully this year someone else drafted him before me,

0:28:17.320 --> 0:28:19.320
<v Speaker 3>so I didn't have to suffer through it because he

0:28:19.400 --> 0:28:21.320
<v Speaker 3>was great for three months in the summer, but the

0:28:21.359 --> 0:28:23.440
<v Speaker 3>rest of his season has just been a total train wreck.

0:28:23.840 --> 0:28:24.320
<v Speaker 1>Go cars.

0:28:24.320 --> 0:28:25.880
<v Speaker 2>Maybe last thing I'd love to be in a draft

0:28:25.960 --> 0:28:28.080
<v Speaker 2>room with Welsh where O'Neal Cruz is taken in the

0:28:28.080 --> 0:28:31.600
<v Speaker 2>first round. Fun fact Oneal Cruz has not been taken

0:28:31.720 --> 0:28:33.800
<v Speaker 2>in our early mock draft yet and we are in

0:28:33.880 --> 0:28:36.640
<v Speaker 2>round ten right now, so just fun.

0:28:37.200 --> 0:28:42.440
<v Speaker 3>If you have exit velocity as a category.

0:28:42.040 --> 0:28:44.680
<v Speaker 2>One hundred percent, if Eve was, he would be a

0:28:44.760 --> 0:28:47.480
<v Speaker 2>first round pick. If we were talking about how fast

0:28:47.520 --> 0:28:50.880
<v Speaker 2>they throw the ball as an extra category, we you

0:28:50.920 --> 0:28:52.720
<v Speaker 2>know what fan tracks is pretty customizable.

0:28:52.800 --> 0:28:54.000
<v Speaker 1>I want to do one of those next year.

0:28:54.000 --> 0:28:55.200
<v Speaker 4>I want to that would be fun.

0:28:55.320 --> 0:28:59.040
<v Speaker 2>I want to do a league of just ridiculously dumb stats.

0:28:59.080 --> 0:29:03.280
<v Speaker 2>It'll be like exit velocity on hits, on throws, putouts.

0:29:03.320 --> 0:29:04.600
<v Speaker 1>It'll just be the dumb league.

0:29:04.600 --> 0:29:06.800
<v Speaker 2>It'll be the dumb fantasy baseball league with no actual

0:29:07.480 --> 0:29:10.400
<v Speaker 2>ale launch sure launch angle. We'll do a lot of

0:29:10.400 --> 0:29:13.040
<v Speaker 2>that stuff. Yeah, we'll ce sw will have it. Not

0:29:13.120 --> 0:29:15.560
<v Speaker 2>that that's dumb, but we'll have that as not a actual,

0:29:15.720 --> 0:29:18.080
<v Speaker 2>like you know, categorical type of thing accounting stat We'll

0:29:18.080 --> 0:29:19.720
<v Speaker 2>just put all that fun stuff in there that everyone

0:29:19.800 --> 0:29:20.520
<v Speaker 2>likes to site.

0:29:20.840 --> 0:29:22.560
<v Speaker 1>For Oneo Cruz love.

0:29:22.360 --> 0:29:26.040
<v Speaker 2>It, love it all right, home run calls, frindos, someone's

0:29:26.080 --> 0:29:29.160
<v Speaker 2>going to be winning that. Fernando Tatis Jersey signed for

0:29:29.320 --> 0:29:32.440
<v Speaker 2>Nano Tatis Junior sign Jersey and right now.

0:29:33.160 --> 0:29:36.000
<v Speaker 1>It is Cat Fox Cat Fox with fifty six.

0:29:35.800 --> 0:29:38.720
<v Speaker 2>Homers as we are tailing out. I'm assuming this goes

0:29:38.800 --> 0:29:42.600
<v Speaker 2>not till Friday when we end, but probably till like

0:29:42.720 --> 0:29:45.760
<v Speaker 2>Wednesday or whatever. October third is when this contest is

0:29:45.760 --> 0:29:47.640
<v Speaker 2>going to go through. So if that is the case,

0:29:47.680 --> 0:29:49.600
<v Speaker 2>someone will have to let me know. I won't be

0:29:49.640 --> 0:29:52.600
<v Speaker 2>able to announce necessarily the winner, but currently Cat Fox

0:29:52.840 --> 0:29:54.080
<v Speaker 2>got a Mike Trout.

0:29:53.800 --> 0:29:56.200
<v Speaker 1>Homer which puts them in the.

0:29:56.200 --> 0:29:59.520
<v Speaker 2>Lead over Elscow with fifty five, Helpless in Miami at

0:29:59.520 --> 0:30:02.920
<v Speaker 2>fifty four high Kubby twenty sixteen at fifty three, de

0:30:03.080 --> 0:30:05.120
<v Speaker 2>Blum and Go Cards got back on the board at

0:30:05.120 --> 0:30:08.880
<v Speaker 2>fifty two, so very tight race. With a tiny bit

0:30:08.920 --> 0:30:11.880
<v Speaker 2>over a week to go, we are within two homers

0:30:11.920 --> 0:30:14.640
<v Speaker 2>of the top three, so anything can happen at any moment,

0:30:14.960 --> 0:30:17.240
<v Speaker 2>and wonky hit okay till a regular season, so that's

0:30:17.360 --> 0:30:19.920
<v Speaker 2>till next week with a wonky bonus in there. Final

0:30:20.000 --> 0:30:22.120
<v Speaker 2>day will probably have a wonky bonus.

0:30:21.840 --> 0:30:25.720
<v Speaker 1>So it is all on the table for everybody. Friendos.

0:30:25.760 --> 0:30:28.520
<v Speaker 2>If you guys want to get your bonus today, you

0:30:28.600 --> 0:30:30.520
<v Speaker 2>can still do it over at BETMGM.

0:30:30.600 --> 0:30:32.560
<v Speaker 1>Just just that promo code leading off.

0:30:32.480 --> 0:30:35.360
<v Speaker 2>Get a thousand dollars risk free first bet up to

0:30:35.400 --> 0:30:38.120
<v Speaker 2>that and you can make some awesome bets on props

0:30:38.480 --> 0:30:42.440
<v Speaker 2>or It is going to be baseball playoff season, a

0:30:42.520 --> 0:30:45.360
<v Speaker 2>great time to make the action even more exciting.

0:30:45.480 --> 0:30:46.720
<v Speaker 1>Go over to bet MGM today.

0:30:46.760 --> 0:30:49.160
<v Speaker 2>Our sponsors use a promo code leading off and you

0:30:49.200 --> 0:30:51.320
<v Speaker 2>are gonna get hooked up and I put some bets

0:30:51.360 --> 0:30:53.520
<v Speaker 2>together today. And Andrew, I'm excited to see what you

0:30:53.520 --> 0:30:55.360
<v Speaker 2>have to say about these. Of course, you know my drill.

0:30:55.640 --> 0:30:59.200
<v Speaker 2>Total bases ks the top and then the top plus

0:30:59.240 --> 0:31:02.000
<v Speaker 2>money play on both of those. Tristan Cosas is the

0:31:02.080 --> 0:31:05.240
<v Speaker 2>number one play of the day according to the Betting

0:31:05.280 --> 0:31:09.280
<v Speaker 2>pros algorithm. Projected at two total bases. The number today

0:31:09.320 --> 0:31:12.320
<v Speaker 2>is only one. It's half, so you need one total base.

0:31:12.600 --> 0:31:15.680
<v Speaker 2>It is minus one sixty five at bet mgm for

0:31:15.720 --> 0:31:18.440
<v Speaker 2>Tristan Cosas of the Boston Red Sox going up against Baltimore.

0:31:18.720 --> 0:31:22.200
<v Speaker 2>The plus money play is Travis Darnault with Atlanta. It

0:31:22.320 --> 0:31:24.560
<v Speaker 2>is one and a half total basis. He's projected at too,

0:31:24.560 --> 0:31:26.840
<v Speaker 2>but it's paying you plus money on bet mgm at

0:31:26.880 --> 0:31:30.560
<v Speaker 2>plus one fifteen. That was the number one plus money

0:31:30.640 --> 0:31:32.880
<v Speaker 2>total base play that I found on betting pros prop

0:31:32.960 --> 0:31:36.200
<v Speaker 2>cheat sheet, the Pitching Ones. This one was almost a

0:31:36.240 --> 0:31:40.480
<v Speaker 2>plus money play. Luis Severino going up against Toronto projected

0:31:40.640 --> 0:31:42.880
<v Speaker 2>at almost six strikeouts. The number is only four and

0:31:42.920 --> 0:31:45.560
<v Speaker 2>a half and it's minus one oh six on FanDuel,

0:31:45.600 --> 0:31:47.920
<v Speaker 2>so it's practically even money and the plus money play

0:31:47.960 --> 0:31:49.360
<v Speaker 2>because there's not a whole lot of options.

0:31:49.360 --> 0:31:49.760
<v Speaker 1>Today.

0:31:50.000 --> 0:31:53.320
<v Speaker 2>You did get one Kevin Gossman, who is six and

0:31:53.320 --> 0:31:55.760
<v Speaker 2>a half on the strikeouts projected at six sevens, which

0:31:55.920 --> 0:31:58.280
<v Speaker 2>really tight. But it's going up against the Yankees and

0:31:58.320 --> 0:32:01.440
<v Speaker 2>it's plus one ten on bet MGM. So MGM is

0:32:01.440 --> 0:32:04.720
<v Speaker 2>giving you the big plays as far as everything goes,

0:32:04.760 --> 0:32:08.640
<v Speaker 2>the best lines that you can find. So Cassas, Darnault, Severino, Gossman,

0:32:08.720 --> 0:32:09.680
<v Speaker 2>anything you like out of these?

0:32:09.720 --> 0:32:12.160
<v Speaker 4>Andrew Well, I really like the Severino one.

0:32:12.200 --> 0:32:15.080
<v Speaker 3>I think that he he should be able to cruise

0:32:15.080 --> 0:32:18.120
<v Speaker 3>past that so I and that's almost even money. I

0:32:18.440 --> 0:32:21.200
<v Speaker 3>think that's a really solid bet. I'm tempted by the

0:32:21.280 --> 0:32:24.520
<v Speaker 3>Darnault one as well. The problem is we need to

0:32:24.520 --> 0:32:26.360
<v Speaker 3>see if he's actually in the lineup today because he's

0:32:26.400 --> 0:32:28.720
<v Speaker 3>been in the lineup the last four games in a row,

0:32:28.800 --> 0:32:32.040
<v Speaker 3>so there's a chance that he sits for this game.

0:32:32.120 --> 0:32:34.480
<v Speaker 3>But if he doesn't, he's swinging a hop at lately,

0:32:35.040 --> 0:32:39.080
<v Speaker 3>and you know he's facing a Corey Abbot, so it's

0:32:39.080 --> 0:32:40.240
<v Speaker 3>a good opportunity for him.

0:32:40.680 --> 0:32:42.959
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and yeah, the char will be back.

0:32:43.000 --> 0:32:45.200
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to bring the tier back on Wednesday for

0:32:45.400 --> 0:32:47.320
<v Speaker 2>Walkee and then I'm going to bring it back on

0:32:47.400 --> 0:32:48.400
<v Speaker 2>Friday with Joe.

0:32:49.080 --> 0:32:52.000
<v Speaker 1>What you guys have for Friday, which is why we.

0:32:51.960 --> 0:32:54.600
<v Speaker 2>Should flood the stream if you have the potential of

0:32:54.640 --> 0:32:57.480
<v Speaker 2>the Crown, the King, and I guess the Queen, the

0:32:57.560 --> 0:33:00.360
<v Speaker 2>Tiara and the Crown in one place together, which you

0:33:00.360 --> 0:33:02.280
<v Speaker 2>have not seen. So that is going to be on

0:33:02.320 --> 0:33:05.600
<v Speaker 2>the docket for Friday for sure. DFS. It's such a

0:33:05.600 --> 0:33:09.320
<v Speaker 2>short slate of stuff. You know, there's obviously some implied runs.

0:33:09.320 --> 0:33:11.720
<v Speaker 2>Pittsburgh actually might be kind of interesting to go with today,

0:33:11.760 --> 0:33:14.440
<v Speaker 2>but you guys can kind of fin through that and

0:33:14.440 --> 0:33:18.800
<v Speaker 2>that leads us finally to the home run calls, And

0:33:18.920 --> 0:33:21.120
<v Speaker 2>this is your final final home run call of the year.

0:33:21.240 --> 0:33:22.440
<v Speaker 1>So what do you got for us?

0:33:23.240 --> 0:33:25.000
<v Speaker 3>Well, I'm going to go with my favorite pickup of

0:33:25.040 --> 0:33:28.120
<v Speaker 3>the year and that's Michael Harris. So Michael Harris going

0:33:28.160 --> 0:33:31.080
<v Speaker 3>against Corey Abbott. You know, if I wanted to go,

0:33:31.480 --> 0:33:33.240
<v Speaker 3>I feel like the Braids are going to score a

0:33:33.280 --> 0:33:35.840
<v Speaker 3>lot of runs in that game. It'd be easy to

0:33:35.880 --> 0:33:38.360
<v Speaker 3>go with Riley, He's the biggest power bat.

0:33:38.240 --> 0:33:38.840
<v Speaker 4>In their lineup.

0:33:39.520 --> 0:33:42.160
<v Speaker 3>But I'm going I'm going with my boy, Michael Harris,

0:33:42.160 --> 0:33:45.280
<v Speaker 3>who's made me a happy fantasy manager this season.

0:33:46.320 --> 0:33:49.560
<v Speaker 1>Go Cards, Come well, I mean, you know, we're good here.

0:33:49.600 --> 0:33:50.240
<v Speaker 1>We like this tire.

0:33:50.320 --> 0:33:52.320
<v Speaker 2>We like to have fun, my friend, and it'll be

0:33:52.360 --> 0:33:54.640
<v Speaker 2>fun with Joe and I. I wonder who Joe's home

0:33:54.680 --> 0:33:56.440
<v Speaker 2>run call is going to be. By the way, it's

0:33:56.440 --> 0:33:59.240
<v Speaker 2>going to be Aaron Judge like it is today, I'm

0:33:59.240 --> 0:34:00.760
<v Speaker 2>not going to go with there and Judge, I'm actually

0:34:00.760 --> 0:34:02.000
<v Speaker 2>go with the guy you just said. I'm gonna go

0:34:02.040 --> 0:34:04.240
<v Speaker 2>with Austin wrighty. I actually would have liked Michael Harris.

0:34:04.440 --> 0:34:06.320
<v Speaker 2>I don't want to jump on yours, So I'm gonna

0:34:06.360 --> 0:34:09.120
<v Speaker 2>go with Michael Harris on I'm sorry with Austin Rightley,

0:34:09.120 --> 0:34:10.600
<v Speaker 2>as you go with Michael Harris will stay in the

0:34:10.600 --> 0:34:14.160
<v Speaker 2>same game. Wonkey has got Adley Rutschman, and Mike Mayer

0:34:14.239 --> 0:34:15.680
<v Speaker 2>is going with Raphael Devers.

0:34:16.040 --> 0:34:17.000
<v Speaker 1>And just if I.

0:34:16.960 --> 0:34:19.719
<v Speaker 2>Had just gotten before it, we probably could have had

0:34:19.760 --> 0:34:21.560
<v Speaker 2>that bald bonus. But maybe we can get a bald

0:34:21.560 --> 0:34:24.040
<v Speaker 2>bonus on Friday. That would be kind of fun in

0:34:24.080 --> 0:34:26.120
<v Speaker 2>the whole thing of it. Andrew, you did a fantastic

0:34:26.200 --> 0:34:29.080
<v Speaker 2>job this season. I don't know obviously if there was

0:34:29.120 --> 0:34:30.920
<v Speaker 2>you know, there's more shows in the playoffs or something,

0:34:30.960 --> 0:34:32.840
<v Speaker 2>maybe we'll get more of you. But but the regular

0:34:32.880 --> 0:34:35.120
<v Speaker 2>season goes. This was the final show. I really enjoyed

0:34:35.120 --> 0:34:37.279
<v Speaker 2>doing these shows with you and all these episodes, and

0:34:37.280 --> 0:34:39.279
<v Speaker 2>I think everybody did as well. You can find them

0:34:39.280 --> 0:34:42.720
<v Speaker 2>on Twitter at Andrew Underscore Cipher. Any last things to plug,

0:34:42.760 --> 0:34:43.440
<v Speaker 2>my friend.

0:34:43.800 --> 0:34:45.880
<v Speaker 4>Just go check out that Waiver Wire article. It'll give

0:34:45.920 --> 0:34:46.759
<v Speaker 4>you a whole bunch of names.

0:34:46.800 --> 0:34:49.719
<v Speaker 3>It's even got some names for deeper leagues as well,

0:34:49.800 --> 0:34:53.440
<v Speaker 3>so if you just look on the baseball page, you're

0:34:53.440 --> 0:34:56.759
<v Speaker 3>sure to find it on Fantasy pros to give you

0:34:56.800 --> 0:34:59.359
<v Speaker 3>a few names to get in your lineup and take

0:34:59.400 --> 0:35:00.279
<v Speaker 3>home that Champ.

0:35:00.080 --> 0:35:01.120
<v Speaker 4>And Chip do it.

0:35:01.360 --> 0:35:04.160
<v Speaker 2>Find me on Twitter at is it the Welsh and friends,

0:35:04.200 --> 0:35:06.760
<v Speaker 2>we've got the Bubba in the house tomorrow, Casey Bubba's

0:35:06.760 --> 0:35:09.400
<v Speaker 2>hanging with me. We will be back same time on Tuesday,

0:35:10.080 --> 0:35:11.440
<v Speaker 2>not the Tiara and the Crown.

0:35:11.239 --> 0:35:14.000
<v Speaker 1>But it'll be the Bubba and the Welsh and then

0:35:14.040 --> 0:35:16.800
<v Speaker 1>we'll have the Crown and the Tiara on Friday. Happy

0:35:16.840 --> 0:35:17.520
<v Speaker 1>birthday to Joe.

0:35:17.560 --> 0:35:19.239
<v Speaker 2>Go and shoot him at text and let him know

0:35:19.600 --> 0:35:21.560
<v Speaker 2>until next time. Friends, we'll talk to you again tomorrow.

0:35:21.640 --> 0:35:23.720
<v Speaker 2>Right here, and leading off for Andrew, I'm Welsh.

0:35:24.120 --> 0:35:26.279
<v Speaker 1>Goodbye. Go in those ships, Go in those things. When

0:35:26.640 --> 0:35:27.120
<v Speaker 1>two things