WEBVTT - Beating The Book: Guessing Lines Week 9

0:00:03.440 --> 0:00:12.760
<v Speaker 1>Check it down man, now down man. Good Monday morning

0:00:12.840 --> 0:00:14.600
<v Speaker 1>to you right here on the Numbers game at Visa

0:00:14.760 --> 0:00:17.560
<v Speaker 1>Sports Betting Network Serious except Channel two four, Visa dot Com,

0:00:17.600 --> 0:00:22.200
<v Speaker 1>the Visa Boa Sling and Game Plus guessing lines for

0:00:22.400 --> 0:00:24.880
<v Speaker 1>week number nine in the National Football League. That's what

0:00:24.920 --> 0:00:27.440
<v Speaker 1>we do here on Monday's um. We'll look back, of

0:00:27.480 --> 0:00:29.920
<v Speaker 1>course to all the games at week eight. Uh. And

0:00:30.040 --> 0:00:32.360
<v Speaker 1>we do this with a gentleman who was not able

0:00:32.360 --> 0:00:34.720
<v Speaker 1>to make it last week, but of course he's the

0:00:34.760 --> 0:00:36.720
<v Speaker 1>star of the show and he's back with us this week.

0:00:36.760 --> 0:00:38.880
<v Speaker 1>We could not be happier. He's the south Point Sports

0:00:38.880 --> 0:00:41.960
<v Speaker 1>Book Director, Chris the Andrews. Good morning to you, Chris.

0:00:41.960 --> 0:00:46.560
<v Speaker 1>How are you? I'm not too bad, Gil going the

0:00:47.000 --> 0:00:49.120
<v Speaker 1>way better than I did last week, that's for sure.

0:00:49.320 --> 0:00:53.360
<v Speaker 1>Before we get into any of this, of the system

0:00:53.400 --> 0:00:55.240
<v Speaker 1>that we do here on the show, which is I'm

0:00:55.280 --> 0:00:57.280
<v Speaker 1>in a Cocoon. This is a tribute to the old

0:00:57.280 --> 0:01:00.520
<v Speaker 1>Stardust radio show of the same of the same milk,

0:01:00.640 --> 0:01:02.600
<v Speaker 1>where we go through the lines. You tell us what

0:01:02.600 --> 0:01:04.720
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna post. I am in a cocoon. I guessed

0:01:04.760 --> 0:01:06.720
<v Speaker 1>them before we get in any of that. Can you

0:01:06.760 --> 0:01:09.200
<v Speaker 1>walk us through because I think that you are beloved

0:01:09.319 --> 0:01:12.080
<v Speaker 1>for sure. Uh, And so I think people want to

0:01:12.120 --> 0:01:15.959
<v Speaker 1>know how you when you first felt symptoms, What were

0:01:15.959 --> 0:01:18.120
<v Speaker 1>they like, how bad did they get? What was the

0:01:18.160 --> 0:01:20.520
<v Speaker 1>full arc? How do you feel now, et cetera. Take

0:01:20.600 --> 0:01:24.880
<v Speaker 1>us back to the first time you felt something odd. Well,

0:01:25.040 --> 0:01:28.319
<v Speaker 1>last Thursday, you know, probably late in the afternoon, I

0:01:28.360 --> 0:01:33.480
<v Speaker 1>just started coughing and coughing and coughing. And you know,

0:01:33.840 --> 0:01:35.960
<v Speaker 1>I just in this day and age when I first started,

0:01:36.520 --> 0:01:39.160
<v Speaker 1>I I have COVID, you know. And that night I

0:01:39.240 --> 0:01:42.640
<v Speaker 1>went home, tried to sleep. It was up all night,

0:01:42.959 --> 0:01:45.119
<v Speaker 1>you know, I couldn't sleep more in ten fifteen minutes

0:01:45.160 --> 0:01:47.520
<v Speaker 1>at a time because my coughing and just waked me up.

0:01:47.880 --> 0:01:51.400
<v Speaker 1>Finally went into uh you know, you know, an easy

0:01:51.440 --> 0:01:54.280
<v Speaker 1>boy and a lady boys chair. Got a little bit

0:01:54.280 --> 0:01:55.760
<v Speaker 1>of sleep here, so I could sleep a little better

0:01:55.760 --> 0:01:58.280
<v Speaker 1>that way. So I got up in the morning feeling

0:01:58.440 --> 0:02:01.680
<v Speaker 1>just weird, you know. UH, had the run of the

0:02:01.680 --> 0:02:06.280
<v Speaker 1>bathroom on occasion, took my temperature. It was ninety seven

0:02:06.320 --> 0:02:09.440
<v Speaker 1>point oh at one point, and then you know, I

0:02:09.520 --> 0:02:12.680
<v Speaker 1>know that's not a fever, the exact opposite, and something's wrong,

0:02:13.240 --> 0:02:14.800
<v Speaker 1>you know. Then I took it like about half an

0:02:14.840 --> 0:02:17.680
<v Speaker 1>hour later and it was ninety nine point nine. And

0:02:17.720 --> 0:02:20.600
<v Speaker 1>I usually run a little low, so ninety nine point

0:02:20.639 --> 0:02:23.320
<v Speaker 1>nine for me is a pretty high fever. So you know,

0:02:23.360 --> 0:02:25.160
<v Speaker 1>I kind of went thro you know, did it like

0:02:25.240 --> 0:02:28.320
<v Speaker 1>again a half hour laterly down in ninety seven, another

0:02:28.360 --> 0:02:32.040
<v Speaker 1>half hour up there nine nine point something. Something is wrong.

0:02:32.120 --> 0:02:34.840
<v Speaker 1>If it's COVID, I certainly I don't want to get

0:02:34.840 --> 0:02:36.480
<v Speaker 1>the rest of the world sick, you know, So I ran,

0:02:36.960 --> 0:02:39.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, Michael Vaughan set us up to get tested,

0:02:39.520 --> 0:02:43.799
<v Speaker 1>to get tested fairly quickly. Uh So, women got tested.

0:02:44.160 --> 0:02:46.120
<v Speaker 1>You know, they told, well, it'll be six to twelve

0:02:46.200 --> 0:02:49.560
<v Speaker 1>hours before we let you know, you know, Okay, they

0:02:49.600 --> 0:02:51.280
<v Speaker 1>call it back like in an hour, and it is now,

0:02:51.360 --> 0:02:53.519
<v Speaker 1>you got it. So I think it's one of those

0:02:53.520 --> 0:02:56.720
<v Speaker 1>deals where you've got it, they get back here right away.

0:02:56.880 --> 0:02:59.680
<v Speaker 1>And so they put you know, my doctors in USC

0:03:00.120 --> 0:03:03.000
<v Speaker 1>Actually I stayed in contact with them throughout this because

0:03:03.000 --> 0:03:05.520
<v Speaker 1>they originally warned me, you know, you gotta trying not

0:03:05.600 --> 0:03:08.119
<v Speaker 1>to get this with my immune system, you know, which

0:03:08.160 --> 0:03:10.600
<v Speaker 1>they had to wipe out in order for the transplant,

0:03:11.040 --> 0:03:13.000
<v Speaker 1>you know. Uh so I thought they put me on

0:03:13.120 --> 0:03:18.160
<v Speaker 1>some stuff, um and and it really it started helping.

0:03:18.560 --> 0:03:21.760
<v Speaker 1>Like after about day four or five, I could see

0:03:21.800 --> 0:03:25.120
<v Speaker 1>I was, I started getting better, like actually fairly dramatically,

0:03:25.760 --> 0:03:27.799
<v Speaker 1>but you know, and it's just been getting better ever

0:03:27.840 --> 0:03:29.640
<v Speaker 1>since then when he just backed up for a second.

0:03:29.639 --> 0:03:32.120
<v Speaker 1>So I found that on Friday. And also and I

0:03:32.160 --> 0:03:34.320
<v Speaker 1>posted this on Twitter, just a little note about it

0:03:34.360 --> 0:03:38.560
<v Speaker 1>without too many details. A good friend of mine got

0:03:38.600 --> 0:03:41.560
<v Speaker 1>it on the Monday before, so like four or five

0:03:41.680 --> 0:03:45.440
<v Speaker 1>days before, got it that day and died the same day.

0:03:45.560 --> 0:03:50.520
<v Speaker 1>Oh my god, you know that? And you know, yeah,

0:03:50.600 --> 0:03:53.000
<v Speaker 1>I was terrified. And like I said, you've got other guys,

0:03:53.120 --> 0:03:55.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, like I saw were Bobby bout and he's

0:03:55.360 --> 0:03:58.240
<v Speaker 1>like one. He sailed through it in a couple of days.

0:03:58.280 --> 0:04:00.880
<v Speaker 1>You know. So there's so much about this disease. They

0:04:00.920 --> 0:04:04.080
<v Speaker 1>just don't know. You affect somebody so differently, Like I said,

0:04:04.120 --> 0:04:06.360
<v Speaker 1>my friend he was sixty three, so a year younger

0:04:06.360 --> 0:04:09.000
<v Speaker 1>than me. They died the same day. And then I

0:04:09.080 --> 0:04:10.800
<v Speaker 1>know another guy, and again I don't want to say

0:04:10.800 --> 0:04:12.480
<v Speaker 1>the company or the name right I have, but a

0:04:12.480 --> 0:04:15.920
<v Speaker 1>good friend of mine, he works with a guy, an

0:04:15.920 --> 0:04:18.479
<v Speaker 1>executive you know, said pretty good care and on it.

0:04:18.720 --> 0:04:21.080
<v Speaker 1>He's had it since like March and can't get rid

0:04:21.120 --> 0:04:24.000
<v Speaker 1>of it, you know, So this disease is just you know,

0:04:24.040 --> 0:04:25.680
<v Speaker 1>like I said, four or five years from the they'll

0:04:25.720 --> 0:04:28.000
<v Speaker 1>come back and say, wow, we really discovered a lot

0:04:28.200 --> 0:04:31.320
<v Speaker 1>you know about But right now it's a brand new

0:04:31.360 --> 0:04:35.720
<v Speaker 1>they don't know. And if that's people really differently, and

0:04:35.880 --> 0:04:39.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure they know exactly why. But I was very,

0:04:39.360 --> 0:04:42.960
<v Speaker 1>very lucky. And you know, beforehand, they thought I would

0:04:42.960 --> 0:04:45.039
<v Speaker 1>be one of the guys that wasn't very lucky, but

0:04:45.440 --> 0:04:47.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, I was, you know, for whatever reason, I

0:04:47.440 --> 0:04:51.840
<v Speaker 1>don't know, you know, but I feel much better today. Uh.

0:04:51.839 --> 0:04:54.240
<v Speaker 1>You know, last week I couldn't talk. I couldn't get

0:04:54.240 --> 0:04:57.000
<v Speaker 1>on you show because I couldn't talk. You know, my

0:04:57.120 --> 0:04:59.640
<v Speaker 1>voice was so bad and if I talked to more

0:04:59.640 --> 0:05:01.640
<v Speaker 1>than like a minute, I would just start coughing. So

0:05:01.680 --> 0:05:04.080
<v Speaker 1>I just couldn't do the show last week. But you know,

0:05:04.120 --> 0:05:07.000
<v Speaker 1>I feel a lot better today. I'm gonna probably get

0:05:07.040 --> 0:05:13.400
<v Speaker 1>tested again, probably tomorrow today day eleven, and uh, you know,

0:05:13.839 --> 0:05:16.320
<v Speaker 1>probably get tested tomorrow. I got to see kind of

0:05:16.320 --> 0:05:19.960
<v Speaker 1>what the protocols are and go from there and uh,

0:05:20.120 --> 0:05:22.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, hopefully I test negative. You know, I do

0:05:23.080 --> 0:05:25.359
<v Speaker 1>feel pretty good, I can tell you that. But I

0:05:25.440 --> 0:05:30.279
<v Speaker 1>do comm you occasionally, but it's not terrible like it was. Okay,

0:05:30.320 --> 0:05:32.279
<v Speaker 1>but the rules are if you if you feel not

0:05:32.440 --> 0:05:34.520
<v Speaker 1>up to anything in the next two hours, you're allowed

0:05:34.560 --> 0:05:36.800
<v Speaker 1>to leave in the middle. That's the rule where we

0:05:36.839 --> 0:05:41.320
<v Speaker 1>agree on that. Okay, you were literally by the way,

0:05:41.360 --> 0:05:43.800
<v Speaker 1>it's Gil Alexander, Chris Andrews. It is a numbers game

0:05:43.880 --> 0:05:46.479
<v Speaker 1>right here at Visa and the Sports Betting Network guessing

0:05:46.520 --> 0:05:48.599
<v Speaker 1>lines for week nine. That's what we're about to do

0:05:48.720 --> 0:05:52.320
<v Speaker 1>here for the National Football League, our Monday tradition. Because

0:05:52.320 --> 0:05:55.080
<v Speaker 1>the last thing on this obviously you, Chrissy, based on

0:05:55.160 --> 0:05:59.680
<v Speaker 1>your your your pre existing conditions. You were the last guy, right,

0:05:59.760 --> 0:06:01.760
<v Speaker 1>the last guy we wanted to get this. So I'm

0:06:01.800 --> 0:06:04.400
<v Speaker 1>just so speak on behalf of everybody. How thrilled we

0:06:04.400 --> 0:06:09.080
<v Speaker 1>are that you're doing better. Um, so good, good? You

0:06:09.080 --> 0:06:11.240
<v Speaker 1>have no idea? Well, I'm sure you do. You you

0:06:11.360 --> 0:06:17.279
<v Speaker 1>more than anybody. Yeah. Okay, Well let's begin with Thursday,

0:06:17.320 --> 0:06:19.400
<v Speaker 1>and as always during this, we'll take a look back

0:06:19.440 --> 0:06:25.680
<v Speaker 1>to what was here this past week. Okay, Thursday, we

0:06:25.760 --> 0:06:29.200
<v Speaker 1>have Green Day at San Francisco. Oh is it gonna

0:06:29.200 --> 0:06:30.799
<v Speaker 1>be tough to make because we don't know who's playing

0:06:30.800 --> 0:06:35.400
<v Speaker 1>for San Francisco. I don't think Jimmy Garoppolo. They got

0:06:35.440 --> 0:06:39.159
<v Speaker 1>him questionable. Yeah, and then there's George Kittle too with

0:06:39.200 --> 0:06:42.159
<v Speaker 1>the foot injury. Right. Both Garoppolo and Kittle left that

0:06:42.240 --> 0:06:47.400
<v Speaker 1>game yesterday, uh and did not return for the Niners.

0:06:47.400 --> 0:06:50.960
<v Speaker 1>The Niners losing to Seattle thirty seven to twenty seven

0:06:50.960 --> 0:06:54.400
<v Speaker 1>in a game that quite frankly wasn't that close. Um.

0:06:54.600 --> 0:06:57.440
<v Speaker 1>San Francisco so passes its lost total already from last

0:06:57.440 --> 0:06:59.599
<v Speaker 1>season with their fourth loss. Jimmy g was eleven of

0:06:59.640 --> 0:07:03.120
<v Speaker 1>sixty for eighty four yards, no touchdowns, one pick. He

0:07:03.160 --> 0:07:06.120
<v Speaker 1>was sacked three times before he was off the field

0:07:06.839 --> 0:07:09.040
<v Speaker 1>next to Baltimore. This is the thing about Garoppolo that

0:07:09.040 --> 0:07:10.720
<v Speaker 1>gets me, and I'll get to I realized it's a

0:07:10.800 --> 0:07:12.920
<v Speaker 1>green Bay at San Francisco, so we usually start with

0:07:12.960 --> 0:07:14.600
<v Speaker 1>the away team. But the thing that gets me about

0:07:14.720 --> 0:07:19.640
<v Speaker 1>about Garoppolo is that next to Baltimore, he has probably

0:07:19.680 --> 0:07:22.360
<v Speaker 1>the best running game in the league. You plugging anybody

0:07:22.360 --> 0:07:24.800
<v Speaker 1>in there, and they have this fabulous running game, and

0:07:24.800 --> 0:07:27.400
<v Speaker 1>so he's got the biggest windows there are on play

0:07:27.400 --> 0:07:31.800
<v Speaker 1>action passes, but he throws pick after pick. So they

0:07:31.920 --> 0:07:34.280
<v Speaker 1>just can't be happy with what they're seeing from him.

0:07:34.600 --> 0:07:36.760
<v Speaker 1>That's his third game this year with no touchdowns and

0:07:36.800 --> 0:07:39.600
<v Speaker 1>at least one pick. Mullins came in Nick Mullins eighteen

0:07:39.640 --> 0:07:42.880
<v Speaker 1>of twenty five for two thirty eight, two touchdowns, no picks,

0:07:42.880 --> 0:07:45.760
<v Speaker 1>no secks, bred and Aiyuk was the biggest target in

0:07:45.920 --> 0:07:48.080
<v Speaker 1>terms of the receiving game eight for ninety wanted a touchdown.

0:07:48.240 --> 0:07:51.400
<v Speaker 1>Minnesota yesterday, excuse me, green Bay yesterday, though, loses to

0:07:51.480 --> 0:07:56.200
<v Speaker 1>Minnesota and they lose outright, one of seven favorites UH

0:07:56.240 --> 0:07:59.440
<v Speaker 1>this week to lose out right. Green Bay loses to

0:07:59.480 --> 0:08:03.000
<v Speaker 1>Minnesota to twenty two. Also a game that probably wasn't

0:08:03.080 --> 0:08:05.880
<v Speaker 1>quite as close as the final score indicates, but Green

0:08:05.920 --> 0:08:07.520
<v Speaker 1>Bay had a shot at the end. It was a

0:08:07.560 --> 0:08:09.480
<v Speaker 1>weird game. It was one of these games where green

0:08:09.520 --> 0:08:12.120
<v Speaker 1>Bay started out with a thirteen play seventy five yard

0:08:12.160 --> 0:08:14.880
<v Speaker 1>touchdown drive and then Minnesota came back with a ten

0:08:14.960 --> 0:08:17.280
<v Speaker 1>play seventy three yard touchdown drive, and that was basically

0:08:17.360 --> 0:08:19.800
<v Speaker 1>the first quarter. Then green Bay came back with a

0:08:19.800 --> 0:08:22.600
<v Speaker 1>fifteen play seventy two yard touchdown drive in the second quarter.

0:08:22.760 --> 0:08:26.160
<v Speaker 1>Minnesota followed with the twelve place sixty seven yard touchdown drive,

0:08:26.600 --> 0:08:29.600
<v Speaker 1>and that was basically the first half. Third quarter starts

0:08:29.680 --> 0:08:32.880
<v Speaker 1>Minnesota ten play eighty five yard touchdown drive. There were

0:08:32.920 --> 0:08:35.480
<v Speaker 1>no punts in this game till the fourth quarter. Minnesota

0:08:35.559 --> 0:08:38.719
<v Speaker 1>scored a touchdown on their first four drives, and that

0:08:39.520 --> 0:08:42.880
<v Speaker 1>fourteen lead. That flip after the half is really what

0:08:43.000 --> 0:08:45.480
<v Speaker 1>decided this game again twenty to twenty two. But this

0:08:45.520 --> 0:08:47.679
<v Speaker 1>is tough without knowing if Garoppolo or Kittle what their

0:08:47.679 --> 0:08:50.280
<v Speaker 1>status is, and I'm not sure Garoppolo matters is I

0:08:50.280 --> 0:08:53.240
<v Speaker 1>guess what I was getting at earlier. I'll say a

0:08:53.360 --> 0:08:55.559
<v Speaker 1>pick them because I don't really know what else to

0:08:55.640 --> 0:09:00.240
<v Speaker 1>make it. It's two and a half light and see

0:09:00.440 --> 0:09:04.839
<v Speaker 1>a three, A couple of threes with juice on the dog. Um,

0:09:05.360 --> 0:09:13.079
<v Speaker 1>I'm a band. I don't know, Yes, yeah, when it happen,

0:09:13.160 --> 0:09:15.760
<v Speaker 1>you know that the Jimmy g fan it's just really interesting.

0:09:16.200 --> 0:09:19.360
<v Speaker 1>You know, let's start with that. You know, when you

0:09:19.400 --> 0:09:22.920
<v Speaker 1>say somebody's wildly inconsistent, usually meets is bad, you know,

0:09:23.040 --> 0:09:26.599
<v Speaker 1>but he's truly inconsistent. And I was reading one of

0:09:26.640 --> 0:09:28.760
<v Speaker 1>the guys, I think just Tim Prowler comed he said,

0:09:29.160 --> 0:09:32.200
<v Speaker 1>let's not forget you know, a couple of months ago

0:09:32.200 --> 0:09:34.640
<v Speaker 1>in the Super Bowl, he was probably eight minutes away

0:09:34.640 --> 0:09:37.720
<v Speaker 1>from being the m v P. And then now you

0:09:37.840 --> 0:09:41.280
<v Speaker 1>just see him and sometimes he looks incredibly good and

0:09:41.360 --> 0:09:44.560
<v Speaker 1>other times it looks incredibly bad. And yessarily looked incredibly bad.

0:09:45.080 --> 0:09:48.079
<v Speaker 1>And Nick Mullins, it was one of those guys where

0:09:48.120 --> 0:09:52.120
<v Speaker 1>I when I see when I see him play, I think, well,

0:09:52.160 --> 0:09:54.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, this kid isn't bad. He's okay. But then

0:09:54.520 --> 0:09:57.400
<v Speaker 1>you start looking at some numbers and eight doesn't produce.

0:09:57.520 --> 0:09:59.640
<v Speaker 1>Now yesterday he did. You know if you look at

0:09:59.679 --> 0:10:02.959
<v Speaker 1>his numb where's my notes here? This QBR with nineties

0:10:02.960 --> 0:10:06.559
<v Speaker 1>seven point? Oh that's really odd. But in a game

0:10:06.800 --> 0:10:10.400
<v Speaker 1>like you said, you're not nearly as close as the

0:10:10.440 --> 0:10:16.560
<v Speaker 1>score would indicate. And um, Seattle, you know, against kind

0:10:16.600 --> 0:10:18.920
<v Speaker 1>of like our prejudices because we keep thinking of Seattle

0:10:18.920 --> 0:10:21.640
<v Speaker 1>with this great defensive ship they're degon is terrible this year.

0:10:22.080 --> 0:10:25.040
<v Speaker 1>So um, but I don't know what to think about

0:10:25.600 --> 0:10:28.880
<v Speaker 1>Mullins and Garoppolo. You think there's no difference. You know,

0:10:28.960 --> 0:10:31.280
<v Speaker 1>you might be right. I think there's a little bit,

0:10:31.360 --> 0:10:33.959
<v Speaker 1>but you know, you might be dead on anyway. I

0:10:34.040 --> 0:10:36.880
<v Speaker 1>kind of like a little higher uh you know, well,

0:10:36.920 --> 0:10:39.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean I didn't like to pick um. I see

0:10:39.679 --> 0:10:41.000
<v Speaker 1>two and a half. I'm gonna open at two and

0:10:41.000 --> 0:10:42.880
<v Speaker 1>a half. I don't think it's worthy of the three.

0:10:43.480 --> 0:10:45.080
<v Speaker 1>But you know, Green Bay has now playing a couple

0:10:45.080 --> 0:10:47.920
<v Speaker 1>of bad games in a row. I had them really

0:10:47.920 --> 0:10:50.400
<v Speaker 1>in the highest echelon of this league. I had to

0:10:50.520 --> 0:10:53.360
<v Speaker 1>drop him down a little bit after after two games

0:10:53.400 --> 0:10:55.880
<v Speaker 1>like that. But I'm gonna open to and a half.

0:10:55.920 --> 0:10:58.560
<v Speaker 1>I think that's okay. But you know, this is gonna

0:10:58.600 --> 0:11:01.720
<v Speaker 1>be really interesting with the short week and the numerous

0:11:01.760 --> 0:11:05.280
<v Speaker 1>injuries oft have had throughout the year. I was checking

0:11:05.280 --> 0:11:08.520
<v Speaker 1>my notes another thing too, No, no team has swung

0:11:08.679 --> 0:11:12.480
<v Speaker 1>more in my power ratings than San Francisco just but

0:11:12.720 --> 0:11:16.640
<v Speaker 1>primarily because of the injuries. They're very difficult to sort

0:11:16.640 --> 0:11:20.040
<v Speaker 1>of pin pinned down because of those injuries. Right, They've

0:11:20.040 --> 0:11:22.079
<v Speaker 1>just been a mash unit. But I think the Kittle

0:11:22.160 --> 0:11:24.400
<v Speaker 1>one is the is potentially the biggest of all of them.

0:11:24.400 --> 0:11:25.800
<v Speaker 1>So we'll see if he's able to play in this

0:11:25.880 --> 0:11:29.320
<v Speaker 1>game or not. Um. Yes, I don't really know what

0:11:29.400 --> 0:11:31.440
<v Speaker 1>to make of that line. Let's go to Sunday morning.

0:11:32.920 --> 0:11:35.120
<v Speaker 1>Jason conn is here, By the way, how many how

0:11:35.120 --> 0:11:37.839
<v Speaker 1>many Sunday morning games we have? Jason? It is three

0:11:38.120 --> 0:11:42.000
<v Speaker 1>late games and eight early games. So like yesterday. Okay,

0:11:42.040 --> 0:11:46.800
<v Speaker 1>all right, what's first, Christie? I'm sorry. Seattle at Buffalo.

0:11:47.520 --> 0:11:51.160
<v Speaker 1>Another good game, Seattle at Buffalo. Things are looking up

0:11:51.200 --> 0:11:54.280
<v Speaker 1>with these matchups. Uh, Seattle, as we mentioned, beats the

0:11:54.640 --> 0:11:58.640
<v Speaker 1>beats the Niners yesterday thirty seven to twenty seven. Russell

0:11:58.679 --> 0:12:02.440
<v Speaker 1>Wilson UH twenty seven of thirty seven for two sixty one,

0:12:02.559 --> 0:12:07.239
<v Speaker 1>four touchdowns, no picks, sacked just twice at DK Metcalf

0:12:07.400 --> 0:12:10.080
<v Speaker 1>was the man yesterday, twelve catches for a hundred sixty

0:12:10.080 --> 0:12:13.520
<v Speaker 1>one yards, both career highs two touchdowns. It is Russell

0:12:13.559 --> 0:12:16.480
<v Speaker 1>Wilson's third game this season with four plus touchdowns and

0:12:16.520 --> 0:12:19.920
<v Speaker 1>no picks. He has twenty six touchdown passes. That's the

0:12:20.000 --> 0:12:23.360
<v Speaker 1>second most in history through seven games. You may recall

0:12:23.440 --> 0:12:27.160
<v Speaker 1>Tom Brady twenty seven back in two thousand seven, and

0:12:27.200 --> 0:12:29.440
<v Speaker 1>the Seahawks are the only team with twenty seven plus

0:12:29.520 --> 0:12:31.559
<v Speaker 1>points in every game this season. They were nine of

0:12:31.679 --> 0:12:34.040
<v Speaker 1>fifteen on third downs. By the way, they were minus

0:12:34.040 --> 0:12:37.199
<v Speaker 1>two in turnovers in that game against the Niners yesterday

0:12:37.240 --> 0:12:41.120
<v Speaker 1>still won last Seattle score. Oh here was my little

0:12:41.160 --> 0:12:42.679
<v Speaker 1>note that I made. I was I make little notes

0:12:42.679 --> 0:12:44.800
<v Speaker 1>since I'm like, what am I saying? Here. There was

0:12:44.840 --> 0:12:46.920
<v Speaker 1>one thing at the end of that game. Uh. It

0:12:47.000 --> 0:12:51.720
<v Speaker 1>was Seattle's last scoring drive and Russell Wilson intended to

0:12:51.760 --> 0:12:53.600
<v Speaker 1>go in for a slide but sort of did a

0:12:53.640 --> 0:12:57.080
<v Speaker 1>hesitation move on the slide and then slid anyway, and

0:12:57.120 --> 0:13:00.000
<v Speaker 1>the Niners defender hit him and got flagged, which helped

0:13:00.000 --> 0:13:03.520
<v Speaker 1>that final drive. They can't throw flags if if a

0:13:03.600 --> 0:13:06.120
<v Speaker 1>quarterback is gonna do some hesitation on that, you can't

0:13:06.160 --> 0:13:08.280
<v Speaker 1>fake a slide and then go into a slide and

0:13:08.320 --> 0:13:10.360
<v Speaker 1>get flagged. That was the one thing I was like that.

0:13:10.360 --> 0:13:14.079
<v Speaker 1>That was one of these officiating notes where I'm just like, that's, uh,

0:13:14.200 --> 0:13:18.000
<v Speaker 1>that's not gonna work for this league. Um. Buffalo yesterday

0:13:18.040 --> 0:13:22.200
<v Speaker 1>somehow beats the Patriots. The Patriots do get the cover

0:13:22.280 --> 0:13:25.760
<v Speaker 1>in this game. Buffalo wins at twenty one, but Cam

0:13:25.800 --> 0:13:28.960
<v Speaker 1>Newton and the Pats were driving late and Cam Newton

0:13:29.000 --> 0:13:32.120
<v Speaker 1>fumbled the football. Josh Allen was eleven of eighteen for

0:13:32.200 --> 0:13:37.400
<v Speaker 1>one no touchdowns, one pick. He was sacked once. He

0:13:37.480 --> 0:13:39.600
<v Speaker 1>was ten for twenty three on the ground with a touchdown.

0:13:39.640 --> 0:13:42.440
<v Speaker 1>Stefan dig six catches for ninety two. Bill's first home

0:13:42.480 --> 0:13:46.480
<v Speaker 1>win versus the pat Sin. But Seattle is at Buffalo.

0:13:46.920 --> 0:13:49.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't think there's any way Buffalo can be favored

0:13:49.080 --> 0:13:50.800
<v Speaker 1>in this game. I think people are sort of onto

0:13:50.880 --> 0:13:55.600
<v Speaker 1>Buffalo's absolute one dimensional game on offense and New England,

0:13:55.600 --> 0:13:57.640
<v Speaker 1>for goodness sake, New England one wast beat him. So

0:13:57.640 --> 0:13:59.680
<v Speaker 1>I'll say, see, I'll split the difference between three and

0:13:59.720 --> 0:14:01.840
<v Speaker 1>the called say Seattle minus one and a half on

0:14:01.880 --> 0:14:06.120
<v Speaker 1>the road, you're a shade light. It's two and a half.

0:14:06.120 --> 0:14:10.040
<v Speaker 1>I even two and a half some juice, uh too?

0:14:10.440 --> 0:14:13.480
<v Speaker 1>I got like three three threes with juice on the dog.

0:14:13.840 --> 0:14:16.960
<v Speaker 1>How many it go with two and a half. I

0:14:17.000 --> 0:14:19.400
<v Speaker 1>forgot to mention this during the San Francisco game, But

0:14:19.640 --> 0:14:22.480
<v Speaker 1>there is a huge steam from the wise guys on

0:14:22.560 --> 0:14:27.440
<v Speaker 1>San Francisco yesterday, and I have to kind of respect

0:14:27.440 --> 0:14:29.560
<v Speaker 1>that because it was really, you know, from guys I

0:14:29.640 --> 0:14:33.320
<v Speaker 1>highly respected. Now would've betting on San Francisco or they

0:14:33.400 --> 0:14:35.520
<v Speaker 1>betting against Seattle, And that's a question you have to

0:14:35.520 --> 0:14:41.280
<v Speaker 1>ask yourself. The thing in Seattle's defense is terrible. And hey, Jil,

0:14:41.320 --> 0:14:44.280
<v Speaker 1>I got the root for Russell Wilson yesterday. I was

0:14:44.360 --> 0:14:48.480
<v Speaker 1>for Big T. I got a top well, I got

0:14:48.520 --> 0:14:51.080
<v Speaker 1>a couple every year. That was one of them. Uh,

0:14:51.280 --> 0:14:53.400
<v Speaker 1>but I do have to wonder, you know what went

0:14:53.440 --> 0:14:55.960
<v Speaker 1>into that handicupp because I mean it really was huge,

0:14:56.040 --> 0:15:00.480
<v Speaker 1>huge steam. Um. So I like the two and a half,

0:15:00.480 --> 0:15:02.280
<v Speaker 1>but I gotta tell you my power ratings, and I

0:15:02.320 --> 0:15:07.760
<v Speaker 1>still I still regard Seattle like really really good. Um

0:15:08.400 --> 0:15:11.160
<v Speaker 1>those defensive flaws. But you know, is Russell Wilson and

0:15:11.240 --> 0:15:14.960
<v Speaker 1>octobercome him a lot of times he is. Yeah, So

0:15:15.080 --> 0:15:16.840
<v Speaker 1>I liked I liked the two and a half. I

0:15:16.920 --> 0:15:19.000
<v Speaker 1>think it's not worthy of the three. I think three

0:15:19.040 --> 0:15:22.240
<v Speaker 1>they would take. Um. I hadn't feeling will get the

0:15:22.280 --> 0:15:24.120
<v Speaker 1>three at some point during this week, and we may

0:15:24.160 --> 0:15:27.120
<v Speaker 1>even close three come Sunday. I assume with those seven

0:15:27.200 --> 0:15:29.320
<v Speaker 1>dogs winning out right this week so far, that you've

0:15:29.360 --> 0:15:35.680
<v Speaker 1>had a phenomenal weekend. From a book's perspective, no complaints,

0:15:35.160 --> 0:15:38.800
<v Speaker 1>no complaints, all right, By the way, the book he's

0:15:38.840 --> 0:15:41.240
<v Speaker 1>always find something to complain about, believe me. But I

0:15:41.280 --> 0:15:43.400
<v Speaker 1>got no and you've got none. By the way, for

0:15:43.400 --> 0:15:45.240
<v Speaker 1>those landing on this show again, not only the tribute

0:15:45.240 --> 0:15:46.760
<v Speaker 1>to the old start US radio show, but we often

0:15:46.800 --> 0:15:48.640
<v Speaker 1>find that our first impressions here on Monday or the

0:15:48.680 --> 0:15:51.880
<v Speaker 1>best uh as a better From the betting side of things,

0:15:52.240 --> 0:15:54.720
<v Speaker 1>last week, the two lines where we did the bastardized version.

0:15:54.760 --> 0:15:56.880
<v Speaker 1>We didn't do guessing lines without you, Chrissie, but Jason

0:15:56.920 --> 0:15:58.720
<v Speaker 1>and I just went through the games because I had

0:15:58.760 --> 0:16:00.560
<v Speaker 1>taken all these notes, might as well wasted. But we

0:16:00.560 --> 0:16:02.120
<v Speaker 1>didn't do a guessing lines. We didn't put it in

0:16:02.160 --> 0:16:04.920
<v Speaker 1>podcast for him. But the two lines that definitely stuck

0:16:04.920 --> 0:16:08.720
<v Speaker 1>out as odd last week were the Steelers and the Ravens,

0:16:08.840 --> 0:16:11.760
<v Speaker 1>which I could not understand how that was five and

0:16:11.800 --> 0:16:14.360
<v Speaker 1>a half on Monday morning just makes no sense. And

0:16:14.360 --> 0:16:17.200
<v Speaker 1>the other one was Denver and UH and the Chargers,

0:16:17.200 --> 0:16:20.080
<v Speaker 1>which I believe I sort of said something like, listen,

0:16:20.080 --> 0:16:22.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't know why I like Denver, but Anthony lenn

0:16:22.080 --> 0:16:23.560
<v Speaker 1>and the Charges will figure out a way not to

0:16:23.600 --> 0:16:26.280
<v Speaker 1>cover this. So those are those are the only tip uh.

0:16:26.400 --> 0:16:28.920
<v Speaker 1>We'll get to those games. Let's do one more here

0:16:28.960 --> 0:16:32.080
<v Speaker 1>on Sunday morning for Week nine. Already in the NFL.

0:16:34.080 --> 0:16:37.560
<v Speaker 1>All right, Broncos at the Falcons. There they are, Broncos

0:16:37.680 --> 0:16:40.240
<v Speaker 1>at the Falcons. Falcons will be on extra rest. They're

0:16:40.280 --> 0:16:44.160
<v Speaker 1>coming off their Thursday night win against the Carolina Panthers.

0:16:44.560 --> 0:16:49.200
<v Speaker 1>Denver yesterday drew lock forty one, forty eight three touchdowns,

0:16:49.200 --> 0:16:51.840
<v Speaker 1>one pick. He was sacked twice. Philip Lindsay six of

0:16:51.840 --> 0:16:54.800
<v Speaker 1>eighty three eighty three, I should say for a touchdown

0:16:54.840 --> 0:16:56.560
<v Speaker 1>and and with a touchdown it was a fifty five

0:16:56.640 --> 0:16:59.960
<v Speaker 1>yards scamper that really gave Denver life in the second

0:17:00.000 --> 0:17:03.240
<v Speaker 1>half down twenty one yesterday. I mentioned Atlanta's win over

0:17:03.280 --> 0:17:06.640
<v Speaker 1>Carolina this past Thursday. Matt Ryan was twenty one thirty

0:17:06.760 --> 0:17:08.880
<v Speaker 1>two eighty one, no touchdowns, one pick. He was sacked twice.

0:17:08.960 --> 0:17:12.280
<v Speaker 1>Julio came alive seven for one thirty seven. Uh they

0:17:12.359 --> 0:17:17.080
<v Speaker 1>dominated Caroline in terms of time to possession thirty six. Um.

0:17:17.160 --> 0:17:19.160
<v Speaker 1>I'll get into the well, I might as well, since

0:17:19.160 --> 0:17:21.280
<v Speaker 1>we have time talk about Denver and the Chargers. It

0:17:21.320 --> 0:17:23.359
<v Speaker 1>was gonna wait till the Chargers portion of this, but

0:17:23.400 --> 0:17:27.320
<v Speaker 1>I might as well with Denver being here, the Chargers yesterday,

0:17:27.440 --> 0:17:30.600
<v Speaker 1>that that is there. Let's put up the tweets if

0:17:30.600 --> 0:17:33.600
<v Speaker 1>we can. Jason on the Chargers. They were up yesterday

0:17:33.800 --> 0:17:37.320
<v Speaker 1>twenty four to three. Uh so another twenty one. And

0:17:37.359 --> 0:17:40.480
<v Speaker 1>it was that Lindsay that Lindsay run early in the

0:17:40.520 --> 0:17:42.399
<v Speaker 1>second have, or at least in the third quarter, that

0:17:42.520 --> 0:17:45.240
<v Speaker 1>sort of lit the fire to the provise. You're like Oh, well,

0:17:45.240 --> 0:17:48.159
<v Speaker 1>that was quick. Here's Daniel Popper. Chargers blown leads in

0:17:48.200 --> 0:17:52.360
<v Speaker 1>the last four games seventeen points, seventeen points, sixteen points,

0:17:52.600 --> 0:17:57.520
<v Speaker 1>twenty one points. That's virtually impossible. Virtually impossible. ESPN Stats

0:17:57.520 --> 0:18:01.120
<v Speaker 1>and Information puts it, uh in perspective year teams when

0:18:01.240 --> 0:18:05.840
<v Speaker 1>leading by seventeen plus this season entering last night's game,

0:18:06.160 --> 0:18:09.480
<v Speaker 1>Chargers oh and three, all others fifty two and four.

0:18:10.600 --> 0:18:12.720
<v Speaker 1>And then there's one more from ESPN Stats INNA. But

0:18:12.720 --> 0:18:15.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that's that's impossible. Oh, Chargers o win three

0:18:15.560 --> 0:18:17.439
<v Speaker 1>the rest of the league fifty two and four. Charges

0:18:17.440 --> 0:18:19.560
<v Speaker 1>the first team in NFL history to lose three straight

0:18:19.600 --> 0:18:23.080
<v Speaker 1>games in which they led by seventeen points. Chargers also

0:18:23.160 --> 0:18:26.160
<v Speaker 1>joined the two thousand three Falcons as the only teams

0:18:26.160 --> 0:18:28.240
<v Speaker 1>in NFL history to lose three games after holding a

0:18:28.280 --> 0:18:31.679
<v Speaker 1>seventeen point lead in NFL history. That's uh, courtesy of

0:18:31.680 --> 0:18:36.080
<v Speaker 1>ALIAS as well. So yesterday, it wasn't so much the

0:18:36.119 --> 0:18:39.320
<v Speaker 1>fact that it was any specific Anthony Lennism I think

0:18:39.320 --> 0:18:42.119
<v Speaker 1>people are you know the fact that it's the fourth

0:18:42.200 --> 0:18:44.560
<v Speaker 1>or fifth such episode. This, by the way, Steven Vegas

0:18:44.680 --> 0:18:47.560
<v Speaker 1>who follows as seven oh two Steve sports, um oh,

0:18:47.600 --> 0:18:50.000
<v Speaker 1>that's a different one coming up. That's for another game. Um,

0:18:50.040 --> 0:18:52.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm like a dog being distracted by tweets here in

0:18:52.400 --> 0:18:55.920
<v Speaker 1>different screens of the building. Um, but the charge yesterday,

0:18:55.960 --> 0:19:00.240
<v Speaker 1>the Chargers are up up twenty four to three, okay,

0:19:00.320 --> 0:19:02.520
<v Speaker 1>having blown four leads of sixteen plus as we just

0:19:02.560 --> 0:19:06.640
<v Speaker 1>talked about, But the they gave up plays the Chargers

0:19:06.640 --> 0:19:09.000
<v Speaker 1>did to the Broncos of fifty five yards that was

0:19:09.040 --> 0:19:13.040
<v Speaker 1>the Lindsay run, a forty three yard passed to Judy

0:19:13.119 --> 0:19:17.399
<v Speaker 1>on a subsequent drive, and then a forty yard touchdown later.

0:19:17.840 --> 0:19:20.240
<v Speaker 1>And so it was these huge plays on defense that

0:19:20.280 --> 0:19:23.119
<v Speaker 1>they were giving up. Yes, there was a couple of penalties,

0:19:23.119 --> 0:19:25.840
<v Speaker 1>but this one was just sort of a This wasn't like,

0:19:25.920 --> 0:19:28.879
<v Speaker 1>you know, Anthony Lynn making one poor decision. This was

0:19:28.960 --> 0:19:32.600
<v Speaker 1>just a full full collapse on the part of the

0:19:32.680 --> 0:19:35.800
<v Speaker 1>Chargers defense. As Drew lock In, the Broncos all of

0:19:35.800 --> 0:19:39.520
<v Speaker 1>a sudden looked like the Redskins. All that said, Atlanta

0:19:39.560 --> 0:19:42.080
<v Speaker 1>will be a favorite at home. With extra rest, I'll

0:19:42.080 --> 0:19:47.920
<v Speaker 1>say it's four and a half. Wow, you're better than

0:19:47.920 --> 0:19:51.000
<v Speaker 1>what I came up with. I think four, and it's

0:19:51.040 --> 0:19:54.480
<v Speaker 1>pretty much a solid four. I thought this game will

0:19:54.520 --> 0:19:57.440
<v Speaker 1>be a lot closer than three. Um, you know, went

0:19:57.480 --> 0:20:01.080
<v Speaker 1>through some of my notes, like every four weeks. I'm

0:20:01.080 --> 0:20:03.680
<v Speaker 1>gonna do it again this week, just just for myself.

0:20:04.080 --> 0:20:06.000
<v Speaker 1>I take notes on teams like where do I think,

0:20:06.040 --> 0:20:08.360
<v Speaker 1>where are they going? You know where they've been, blah

0:20:08.440 --> 0:20:11.280
<v Speaker 1>blah blah. And I was looking over my notes before

0:20:11.320 --> 0:20:14.560
<v Speaker 1>this week's games, and Denver I had pegged, I said,

0:20:14.600 --> 0:20:16.479
<v Speaker 1>you know what, there's I don't think we're gonna win

0:20:16.520 --> 0:20:18.399
<v Speaker 1>a lot of games, but I think they're starting to

0:20:18.880 --> 0:20:21.360
<v Speaker 1>becoming a very live dog. And I said the same

0:20:21.359 --> 0:20:23.560
<v Speaker 1>thing about the Bengals, by the way, but I thought

0:20:23.560 --> 0:20:25.560
<v Speaker 1>the Broncos were going to be a very live dog.

0:20:26.720 --> 0:20:30.080
<v Speaker 1>And and you know, I agree with you. Yesterday, though,

0:20:30.240 --> 0:20:32.240
<v Speaker 1>I have to admit, since I'm still not a person,

0:20:32.280 --> 0:20:34.400
<v Speaker 1>I kind of fell asleep during the late afternoon games.

0:20:34.600 --> 0:20:37.119
<v Speaker 1>I woke up in time to see the Broncos score,

0:20:37.119 --> 0:20:38.760
<v Speaker 1>where I was one of the few games with a lot,

0:20:39.160 --> 0:20:41.080
<v Speaker 1>So I don't know everything that happened. I do remember

0:20:41.080 --> 0:20:45.000
<v Speaker 1>the Lindsay right, But I think the Broncos are you know,

0:20:45.359 --> 0:20:48.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't like the coach, not crazy about the quarterback.

0:20:49.840 --> 0:20:52.600
<v Speaker 1>I think there's some teams there's some talent on that team,

0:20:52.720 --> 0:20:55.679
<v Speaker 1>And you know, I think for me, I think anything

0:20:55.720 --> 0:20:58.679
<v Speaker 1>over three, I'd be looking to take the dog. I

0:20:58.800 --> 0:21:01.640
<v Speaker 1>ended open four just because that's what where it is everywhere.

0:21:01.920 --> 0:21:04.160
<v Speaker 1>But I kind of leaned towards the dog on this one.

0:21:04.359 --> 0:21:06.639
<v Speaker 1>And uh, you know, I think they show up in

0:21:06.680 --> 0:21:09.239
<v Speaker 1>Atlanta is another very hard team to figure. They just

0:21:09.280 --> 0:21:11.560
<v Speaker 1>they blow a lot of leads. But they look pretty

0:21:11.600 --> 0:21:13.920
<v Speaker 1>good on Thursday night, you know. And uh, but I

0:21:13.960 --> 0:21:15.639
<v Speaker 1>don't think they deserved to be a four. I like

0:21:15.720 --> 0:21:19.000
<v Speaker 1>them a little lower. I had Denver yesterday. Um, and

0:21:19.080 --> 0:21:21.280
<v Speaker 1>don't get me wrong, there were penalties on the Chargers,

0:21:21.320 --> 0:21:24.359
<v Speaker 1>so it is part of an overall team culture. But man,

0:21:24.400 --> 0:21:27.199
<v Speaker 1>how ethany Lyn still has a job. I have no idea.

0:21:27.440 --> 0:21:29.560
<v Speaker 1>We'll come back. We'll do more. Week nine in the

0:21:29.680 --> 0:21:31.600
<v Speaker 1>NFL Guessing Lines with Chrissy Andrews right here in the

0:21:31.680 --> 0:21:34.560
<v Speaker 1>Numbers game at Visa the sports betting network, our friends

0:21:34.600 --> 0:21:40.600
<v Speaker 1>at Circle with the Circumillions and Survivor Circumillions, Carnage Bills,

0:21:40.680 --> 0:21:45.720
<v Speaker 1>Titans number one and two. Most popularly picked teams Goodbye

0:21:45.720 --> 0:21:51.719
<v Speaker 1>Goodbye Lost loss uh fifth most popular team picked the Rams. Noope,

0:21:52.440 --> 0:21:54.680
<v Speaker 1>by the way. The Rams Dolphins box score, which we'll

0:21:54.680 --> 0:21:57.480
<v Speaker 1>get to is perhaps the funniest Buck score you will

0:21:57.480 --> 0:21:59.960
<v Speaker 1>ever see in your life. So one, two and five

0:22:00.119 --> 0:22:02.360
<v Speaker 1>Bills and Titans being the biggest defenders in circum million,

0:22:02.400 --> 0:22:05.680
<v Speaker 1>then their circus survivor, which had three fifty left. Remember

0:22:05.680 --> 0:22:09.680
<v Speaker 1>there were nine before the season with three on the

0:22:09.720 --> 0:22:15.240
<v Speaker 1>button left. Three entries not placed in miss the deadline,

0:22:15.320 --> 0:22:18.640
<v Speaker 1>so it goes to three. Only sixteen others knocked out

0:22:18.640 --> 0:22:22.760
<v Speaker 1>Titans and Packers. Only five people picked the Packers. It's

0:22:22.760 --> 0:22:25.919
<v Speaker 1>a pretty sharp survivor group, by the way, when you

0:22:25.960 --> 0:22:29.760
<v Speaker 1>consider that that was the most tickets and the Packers. Yeah, MGM,

0:22:30.119 --> 0:22:32.679
<v Speaker 1>yeah Grid last week. Of course, there's planning involved in

0:22:32.720 --> 0:22:35.399
<v Speaker 1>this and scheduling, you know, grids and stuff. Eagles was

0:22:35.440 --> 0:22:38.000
<v Speaker 1>the biggest sweat for people. Hundred forty one people will

0:22:38.000 --> 0:22:40.520
<v Speaker 1>get to the Eagles. Cowboys in a minute, Good lord

0:22:41.240 --> 0:22:44.000
<v Speaker 1>Bucks pending to Night seventy nine. But uh, I think

0:22:44.040 --> 0:22:46.040
<v Speaker 1>the Bucks will roll the Giants. You know one of

0:22:46.080 --> 0:22:47.600
<v Speaker 1>these games where you're like, I think this team is

0:22:47.640 --> 0:22:49.280
<v Speaker 1>going to roll the other team, and you're you're worried

0:22:49.320 --> 0:22:51.480
<v Speaker 1>about sounding stupid. In the end, I do not care

0:22:51.520 --> 0:22:53.400
<v Speaker 1>about stay out sounding stupid. I think the Bucks will

0:22:53.440 --> 0:22:55.919
<v Speaker 1>destroy them. But seventy nine people have the Bucks tonight

0:22:56.040 --> 0:23:00.280
<v Speaker 1>against the Giants. Four Thoroughness's sake, all right, Chrissie, Chris

0:23:00.320 --> 0:23:02.600
<v Speaker 1>Andrews with us from the South Point Hotel Casino. Feeling

0:23:02.640 --> 0:23:08.480
<v Speaker 1>better today, Let's do another one for Sunday morning. Week nine. Okay,

0:23:08.640 --> 0:23:12.880
<v Speaker 1>next stuff, we have the Bears at the Titans. The Bears,

0:23:13.520 --> 0:23:16.560
<v Speaker 1>Bears and the Titans. Good game again. It's a good

0:23:16.640 --> 0:23:22.639
<v Speaker 1>little week. Yeah games. Chicago loses yesterday to New Orleans

0:23:23.280 --> 0:23:28.240
<v Speaker 1>twenty three, and they do so in overtime. Um. See

0:23:28.280 --> 0:23:31.720
<v Speaker 1>that played. You see Whims hitting hitting the guy on

0:23:31.760 --> 0:23:34.320
<v Speaker 1>the Saints a couple of times ejected, He's gonna get

0:23:34.320 --> 0:23:37.680
<v Speaker 1>a suspension, he may, he may get released. That was ridiculous. Um,

0:23:39.040 --> 0:23:42.000
<v Speaker 1>but New Orleans pulls it out to twenty three. New

0:23:42.080 --> 0:23:44.240
<v Speaker 1>Orleans did not have Michael Thomas in this game, which

0:23:44.280 --> 0:23:48.199
<v Speaker 1>was huge Alvin Alvin Kamara Phillip statue. But as far

0:23:48.240 --> 0:23:50.960
<v Speaker 1>as the Bears are concerned, Nick Foles was forty one

0:23:50.960 --> 0:23:54.240
<v Speaker 1>for two seventy two two touchdowns. One. Picky was sacked

0:23:54.240 --> 0:23:57.760
<v Speaker 1>five times by the Saints. D Alan Robinson six of

0:23:57.760 --> 0:24:02.040
<v Speaker 1>eighties seven four touchdown. Let me just say this on

0:24:02.080 --> 0:24:04.879
<v Speaker 1>that on that final drive that Chicago ended up tying

0:24:04.960 --> 0:24:08.240
<v Speaker 1>the game on. How does that Chicago fumble get waved

0:24:08.280 --> 0:24:11.199
<v Speaker 1>off for forward progress? Did you see that Chicago had

0:24:11.359 --> 0:24:14.399
<v Speaker 1>There was a pass, there was no whistle, and it

0:24:14.480 --> 0:24:17.800
<v Speaker 1>was it was probably forward progress. I'm not saying it wasn't,

0:24:18.160 --> 0:24:19.960
<v Speaker 1>but there was no whistle. There was a fumble. The

0:24:19.960 --> 0:24:22.840
<v Speaker 1>Saint should have won the game right there. How the

0:24:22.960 --> 0:24:27.119
<v Speaker 1>how the officials decided they were going to without a whistle,

0:24:27.960 --> 0:24:29.679
<v Speaker 1>you know, go back and say, well, no, actually, it

0:24:29.720 --> 0:24:32.080
<v Speaker 1>wasn't a fumble. It was forward progress. Like if that's

0:24:32.720 --> 0:24:36.880
<v Speaker 1>the Saints are the most chronically screwed team week after week,

0:24:37.000 --> 0:24:38.600
<v Speaker 1>year after year by stuff, but the Saints end up

0:24:38.600 --> 0:24:43.439
<v Speaker 1>winning it nonetheless in overtime. UM twenty three points are fewer,

0:24:43.480 --> 0:24:46.639
<v Speaker 1>and all of five nick Fole starts this year, and

0:24:46.680 --> 0:24:48.960
<v Speaker 1>the Bears are two and three and nick Fole starts,

0:24:49.000 --> 0:24:50.399
<v Speaker 1>by the way, they're three and o and Mitch R.

0:24:50.440 --> 0:24:53.080
<v Speaker 1>Biskie starts. I don't want to start anything. And then

0:24:53.119 --> 0:24:57.000
<v Speaker 1>there's Tennessee. Tennessee loses outright to Cincinnati. Uh, Tennessee teasers

0:24:57.040 --> 0:24:58.320
<v Speaker 1>was the only thing that didn't work out for me

0:24:58.400 --> 0:25:01.639
<v Speaker 1>betting wise. Yesterday, Tanna eighteen of thirty for two thirty three,

0:25:01.640 --> 0:25:04.359
<v Speaker 1>two touchdowns, one pick, he sacked once, Derrick Henry eighteen

0:25:04.400 --> 0:25:07.120
<v Speaker 1>for one twelve and a touchdown Corey excuse me, uh yeah,

0:25:07.440 --> 0:25:11.200
<v Speaker 1>Davis eight for a touchdown. The Titans out gained Cincinnati

0:25:11.240 --> 0:25:13.240
<v Speaker 1>four forty one to three sixty seven. They out because

0:25:13.320 --> 0:25:16.879
<v Speaker 1>they were out possessed by Cincinnati thirty fifty seven too.

0:25:16.960 --> 0:25:23.040
<v Speaker 1>Oh three, I'll say Tennessee minus four and a half. Well,

0:25:23.080 --> 0:25:26.000
<v Speaker 1>that's one of those Gil. I like your number better, yes,

0:25:26.920 --> 0:25:30.280
<v Speaker 1>but it's not my number. My power raised well, first

0:25:30.280 --> 0:25:31.840
<v Speaker 1>of all, let me tell you what's out there. Six

0:25:32.080 --> 0:25:36.560
<v Speaker 1>and pretty much a solid six. My power ratings have

0:25:36.680 --> 0:25:40.720
<v Speaker 1>Tennessee three and a half points better than the Bears

0:25:41.440 --> 0:25:45.520
<v Speaker 1>without home field advance. So six maybe a little bit

0:25:45.520 --> 0:25:47.359
<v Speaker 1>of a stretch. I was thinking more like five and

0:25:47.400 --> 0:25:50.399
<v Speaker 1>a half, and I didn't want to get to the six. Uh.

0:25:50.720 --> 0:25:53.520
<v Speaker 1>But you know, Tennessee has not been great. You know,

0:25:53.520 --> 0:25:57.600
<v Speaker 1>they had one really good game. To escape from my brain,

0:25:57.680 --> 0:25:59.520
<v Speaker 1>what was the one great game they had? But I

0:25:59.680 --> 0:26:02.280
<v Speaker 1>know why. I think the Bears keep this really close.

0:26:02.320 --> 0:26:05.680
<v Speaker 1>I think six is probably a take. I think dthing

0:26:06.080 --> 0:26:08.359
<v Speaker 1>i'd leaned lower. I'm an open six because that's what

0:26:08.400 --> 0:26:11.080
<v Speaker 1>it is by leaned lower. For sure, that might be

0:26:11.119 --> 0:26:13.399
<v Speaker 1>the first one I like today. It's tough because I

0:26:13.440 --> 0:26:15.440
<v Speaker 1>don't know if I really want to. I really want

0:26:15.440 --> 0:26:18.680
<v Speaker 1>to back the Bears, but six boys is a lot um.

0:26:18.880 --> 0:26:20.639
<v Speaker 1>I think the Tennessee game you're talking about is that

0:26:21.520 --> 0:26:25.080
<v Speaker 1>four lost the Steelers last week. Maybe they're winning overtime

0:26:25.119 --> 0:26:27.600
<v Speaker 1>over the Texans, they nip the Vikings, they don't really

0:26:27.640 --> 0:26:29.000
<v Speaker 1>have a great win. To be honest with you, we'll

0:26:29.040 --> 0:26:30.800
<v Speaker 1>come back. It's guessing lines right here on the Numbers

0:26:30.840 --> 0:26:36.240
<v Speaker 1>game in Visa and the Sports Betting Network. Unlike the

0:26:36.280 --> 0:26:38.240
<v Speaker 1>circum millions thing you just threw up, Jason, I did

0:26:38.240 --> 0:26:41.920
<v Speaker 1>well yesterday in the contest. Minnesota, Denver, and Pittsburgh all winners.

0:26:42.400 --> 0:26:46.000
<v Speaker 1>I lost on New Orleans. I didn't get there. Tampa Bay.

0:26:46.000 --> 0:26:48.560
<v Speaker 1>Pending also up Tampa Bay to close out a whole

0:26:48.520 --> 0:26:52.080
<v Speaker 1>bunch of teasers. So I'm all in on Tampa Bay tonight.

0:26:52.600 --> 0:26:54.840
<v Speaker 1>We'll get into that. By the way, Chrissie, Chris Andrews

0:26:54.880 --> 0:26:57.560
<v Speaker 1>back with us, UH feeling better today? Back with us

0:26:57.600 --> 0:27:00.160
<v Speaker 1>to UH guess week nine lines the game you were

0:27:00.160 --> 0:27:02.239
<v Speaker 1>talking about with the with Tennessee. Because I was doing

0:27:02.280 --> 0:27:03.960
<v Speaker 1>it on a glance. As we were talking, was that

0:27:04.080 --> 0:27:08.080
<v Speaker 1>Thursday night game against Buffalo right where they crushed him.

0:27:08.560 --> 0:27:11.080
<v Speaker 1>And now, I don't know how good that looks the

0:27:11.119 --> 0:27:13.199
<v Speaker 1>way Buffalo has been playing, maybe not as good as

0:27:13.280 --> 0:27:17.280
<v Speaker 1>we thought it to be. Yeah, I went back and

0:27:17.320 --> 0:27:20.159
<v Speaker 1>looked myself. I give I had like a grading system,

0:27:20.240 --> 0:27:22.879
<v Speaker 1>and that's like the one good grades, like a really

0:27:22.880 --> 0:27:25.160
<v Speaker 1>good grade that they got. Otherwise they've been really kind

0:27:25.160 --> 0:27:28.320
<v Speaker 1>of mediocre Tennessee. Yeah, so that was the one good one.

0:27:28.840 --> 0:27:32.159
<v Speaker 1>Um so yeah, yeah, we should hit that before we

0:27:32.200 --> 0:27:34.280
<v Speaker 1>move on. But we got some other stuff. Yeah. So

0:27:34.320 --> 0:27:36.240
<v Speaker 1>that but that's the first line. That's a little curious

0:27:36.240 --> 0:27:43.040
<v Speaker 1>to me. Six interesting Interesting, Okay, what's next? Detroit of Minnesota?

0:27:43.440 --> 0:27:47.360
<v Speaker 1>Detroit at Minnesota. We talked about the UH. The Vikings

0:27:47.440 --> 0:27:52.280
<v Speaker 1>Kirk Cousins eleven of fourteen for one sixty one touchdown

0:27:52.280 --> 0:27:54.520
<v Speaker 1>note pics. It was sacked once Dalvin did all the

0:27:54.520 --> 0:27:58.119
<v Speaker 1>heavy lifting. Dalvin Cook thirty for one sixty three and

0:27:58.240 --> 0:28:01.199
<v Speaker 1>three touchdowns that he caught, two passes for sixty three

0:28:01.240 --> 0:28:04.480
<v Speaker 1>and another touchdown. UH scored up. As I said earlier,

0:28:04.480 --> 0:28:06.680
<v Speaker 1>Minnesota scored a touchdown on each of their first four

0:28:06.720 --> 0:28:12.600
<v Speaker 1>possessions as they beat the Packers Detroit yesterday. Um, they lose,

0:28:12.640 --> 0:28:15.240
<v Speaker 1>and they lose pretty big in the end to the

0:28:15.280 --> 0:28:17.840
<v Speaker 1>Indianapolis Colts forty one to twenty one. This was the

0:28:17.920 --> 0:28:21.320
<v Speaker 1>game on the megapod last week where we asked the question,

0:28:21.359 --> 0:28:23.000
<v Speaker 1>what's the game you want no part of? And this

0:28:23.040 --> 0:28:24.639
<v Speaker 1>was my choice, and I think this was Mike Palm's

0:28:24.720 --> 0:28:27.000
<v Speaker 1>choice as well, because these are two of the teams

0:28:27.000 --> 0:28:29.800
<v Speaker 1>that I just cannot seem to put my finger on.

0:28:30.400 --> 0:28:32.520
<v Speaker 1>The Colts were the Lions, but the Colts do get

0:28:32.560 --> 0:28:35.800
<v Speaker 1>it done. For one, Matt Stafford was or forty two

0:28:35.840 --> 0:28:38.560
<v Speaker 1>for three thirty six three touchdowns. He was picked once,

0:28:38.560 --> 0:28:42.640
<v Speaker 1>but he sacked five times. Marvin Hall was his number

0:28:42.680 --> 0:28:45.880
<v Speaker 1>one received for four for one thirteen. The Lions only

0:28:45.880 --> 0:28:49.440
<v Speaker 1>had twenty nine rushing yards in this game yesterday. They

0:28:49.480 --> 0:28:51.840
<v Speaker 1>were minus two in turnovers. So this is an inter

0:28:52.600 --> 0:28:55.960
<v Speaker 1>an intro division game. Detroit at Minnesota. I think it's

0:28:55.960 --> 0:29:01.280
<v Speaker 1>more than a field goal, Say Minnesota minus four. Yeah,

0:29:01.320 --> 0:29:03.640
<v Speaker 1>it's three and a half and four, and I definitely

0:29:03.680 --> 0:29:06.520
<v Speaker 1>leaned to the higher, So I'm gonna open four. You

0:29:06.560 --> 0:29:09.520
<v Speaker 1>know this Detroit team, boy, I'll tell you you know

0:29:10.720 --> 0:29:13.600
<v Speaker 1>just such a poorly run franchise had I mean ever

0:29:13.680 --> 0:29:16.480
<v Speaker 1>since I was a little kid, I never remember Detroit

0:29:16.680 --> 0:29:19.240
<v Speaker 1>really being good. They've had a couple of flashes of

0:29:19.720 --> 0:29:22.240
<v Speaker 1>Mediocwardy being as about as good as they could be.

0:29:22.880 --> 0:29:26.160
<v Speaker 1>And you know, Matthew Stafford that they had, this guy

0:29:26.160 --> 0:29:28.960
<v Speaker 1>have been drafted by somebody else, been with a different organization.

0:29:29.000 --> 0:29:31.760
<v Speaker 1>I think we're talking about Hall of Fame credentials, and

0:29:31.880 --> 0:29:34.080
<v Speaker 1>that's a shame to waste the talent is so good

0:29:34.080 --> 0:29:37.720
<v Speaker 1>because they really don't have anything besides him. Um just

0:29:37.920 --> 0:29:41.040
<v Speaker 1>I think there's just a lot long with this Detroit team.

0:29:41.120 --> 0:29:43.120
<v Speaker 1>And by the way, just to back up a second,

0:29:43.320 --> 0:29:47.280
<v Speaker 1>that was a strangely bad game Detroit and the Colts.

0:29:47.720 --> 0:29:50.880
<v Speaker 1>The early steam from respected wise guys that I got

0:29:51.000 --> 0:29:54.160
<v Speaker 1>was on Detroit. They took it pretty good, but then

0:29:54.160 --> 0:29:57.520
<v Speaker 1>in the last day it was all Indianapolis money. I

0:29:57.520 --> 0:30:00.000
<v Speaker 1>mean from sharp players too. And I always tell everybody

0:30:00.200 --> 0:30:02.560
<v Speaker 1>there's no wise guy union. There's plenty of guys out

0:30:02.600 --> 0:30:05.280
<v Speaker 1>there with money, but that different opinion, and this this

0:30:05.280 --> 0:30:08.240
<v Speaker 1>would be a perfect example. You know, there was a

0:30:08.280 --> 0:30:10.400
<v Speaker 1>lot of early money for the lines, but all the

0:30:10.480 --> 0:30:12.680
<v Speaker 1>late money was on the indian Apolis and I don't

0:30:12.680 --> 0:30:15.400
<v Speaker 1>think it was a setup game. I really don't. Um,

0:30:15.400 --> 0:30:18.600
<v Speaker 1>how often would you say you see how often do

0:30:18.600 --> 0:30:25.560
<v Speaker 1>you say you see that kind of pattern? Um? Maybe

0:30:25.560 --> 0:30:29.000
<v Speaker 1>a couple of times a week. This was an extreme example,

0:30:29.320 --> 0:30:32.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, really was because you know, we hold we

0:30:32.200 --> 0:30:34.680
<v Speaker 1>hold everything at eleven and ten, so they're taking three

0:30:34.720 --> 0:30:38.040
<v Speaker 1>off me when they couldn't get it anywhere else at

0:30:38.080 --> 0:30:40.720
<v Speaker 1>minus one ten. So I had a lot of money

0:30:40.760 --> 0:30:42.800
<v Speaker 1>plus the three. But then you know we went to

0:30:42.840 --> 0:30:44.560
<v Speaker 1>two and a half. That didn't last long. Then the

0:30:44.640 --> 0:30:47.640
<v Speaker 1>flood gates opened the other way, and uh, you know,

0:30:47.680 --> 0:30:49.400
<v Speaker 1>we we lost that game. That was one of our

0:30:49.440 --> 0:30:51.960
<v Speaker 1>few losers for the day. We needed Detroit pretty good.

0:30:52.040 --> 0:30:54.040
<v Speaker 1>But uh, you know, there's a lot, there's a lot

0:30:54.080 --> 0:30:57.280
<v Speaker 1>wrong with that team and the probably starting at the top,

0:30:57.520 --> 0:31:01.120
<v Speaker 1>and it's been that way for probably but fifty sixty years.

0:31:01.200 --> 0:31:04.080
<v Speaker 1>So you know, anyway, I like the higher number here

0:31:04.160 --> 0:31:07.400
<v Speaker 1>to go about way three applete four, But I definitely

0:31:07.480 --> 0:31:09.560
<v Speaker 1>like the four better. You know we have that, there's

0:31:09.720 --> 0:31:11.600
<v Speaker 1>no we have it. But there's a prop out there,

0:31:12.320 --> 0:31:15.720
<v Speaker 1>um that says, will all four teams in a division

0:31:15.920 --> 0:31:18.680
<v Speaker 1>make the playoffs? And it's really referring to the NFC West,

0:31:18.720 --> 0:31:20.200
<v Speaker 1>and before this past weekend, I think it was like

0:31:20.200 --> 0:31:23.080
<v Speaker 1>plus three fifty, yes, which is not nearly enough bang

0:31:23.160 --> 0:31:25.360
<v Speaker 1>for your buck on that. But I will say this,

0:31:25.800 --> 0:31:29.080
<v Speaker 1>there really isn't a lot of teams in the NFC

0:31:29.200 --> 0:31:32.600
<v Speaker 1>that are that are trying to torpedo that. With Detroit losing,

0:31:32.600 --> 0:31:36.400
<v Speaker 1>with Carolina losing, uh, Chicago obviously losing, but New Orleans

0:31:36.440 --> 0:31:38.040
<v Speaker 1>would be the one that would torpedo ad at this

0:31:38.080 --> 0:31:40.040
<v Speaker 1>point if you look at the standings, what is next?

0:31:40.120 --> 0:31:46.560
<v Speaker 1>On Sunday morning, ravings at the colts Man. Good game

0:31:46.600 --> 0:31:48.920
<v Speaker 1>after good game. We finally have a week, Week nine,

0:31:48.920 --> 0:31:52.200
<v Speaker 1>as we're halfway through the NFL season. For most of

0:31:52.200 --> 0:31:56.480
<v Speaker 1>these Baltimore, Indianapolis, Lamar Jackson and the Ravens yesterday lose

0:31:56.520 --> 0:32:00.520
<v Speaker 1>to Pittsburgh. They lose outright to twenty four. Again, one

0:32:00.520 --> 0:32:03.240
<v Speaker 1>of these box scores very strange. Yesterday. Jackson was thirteen

0:32:03.360 --> 0:32:05.600
<v Speaker 1>twenty eight for two oh eight, two touchdowns, two picks,

0:32:05.680 --> 0:32:08.400
<v Speaker 1>we sacked four times, sixteen carries for sixty five yards,

0:32:08.400 --> 0:32:11.400
<v Speaker 1>as well seven turnovers and two career starts versus Pittsburgh,

0:32:11.480 --> 0:32:15.000
<v Speaker 1>including those four picks, yes, excuse me, including four yesterday,

0:32:15.040 --> 0:32:18.160
<v Speaker 1>so two picks, two fumbles. First career loss for Lamar

0:32:18.240 --> 0:32:21.520
<v Speaker 1>Jackson when leading at halftime. So they're out twenty two

0:32:21.520 --> 0:32:25.520
<v Speaker 1>and one. J. K. Dobbins fifteen for one, thirteen edwards

0:32:25.520 --> 0:32:28.040
<v Speaker 1>sixteen eight seven and a touchdown. Sneed five catches for

0:32:28.080 --> 0:32:30.120
<v Speaker 1>one oh six. The Ravens were eight of fifteen on

0:32:30.200 --> 0:32:33.120
<v Speaker 1>third down, one of two on fourth. They outgained Pittsburgh

0:32:33.120 --> 0:32:36.320
<v Speaker 1>four fifty seven to two twenty one, including to sixty

0:32:36.320 --> 0:32:38.680
<v Speaker 1>five to forty eight on the ground. It's the most

0:32:38.760 --> 0:32:42.320
<v Speaker 1>rushing yards in a loss in Ravens franchise history. They

0:32:42.440 --> 0:32:46.040
<v Speaker 1>ran seventy nine plays the Colts only excuse me the uh,

0:32:46.200 --> 0:32:52.040
<v Speaker 1>the Steelers only ran fifty. They outpossessed Pittsburgh thirty eight,

0:32:52.960 --> 0:32:57.560
<v Speaker 1>but nine penalties for one ten yards minus three in turnovers,

0:32:58.120 --> 0:33:00.640
<v Speaker 1>and that'll do it. The pick six to Robert Splaine

0:33:00.680 --> 0:33:02.800
<v Speaker 1>made it seven and nothing Pittsburgh. Then there was a

0:33:02.840 --> 0:33:05.800
<v Speaker 1>pick later Alex Highsmith got it that set up a

0:33:05.840 --> 0:33:08.240
<v Speaker 1>twenty one yard short field cut the lead, that allowed

0:33:08.240 --> 0:33:11.120
<v Speaker 1>Pittsburgh to cut a seventeen to seven deficit to seventeen

0:33:11.120 --> 0:33:15.560
<v Speaker 1>and fourteen. And so really that's what helped Pittsburgh along

0:33:15.720 --> 0:33:19.920
<v Speaker 1>in that game. Uh, those two huge defensive plays Indianapolis

0:33:19.920 --> 0:33:21.560
<v Speaker 1>for their part, as we just mentioned against Detroit and

0:33:21.560 --> 0:33:23.720
<v Speaker 1>their big win, easy win, I should say in the

0:33:23.840 --> 0:33:25.800
<v Speaker 1>n forty one twenty one Rivers twenty three or thirty

0:33:25.800 --> 0:33:28.400
<v Speaker 1>three for two sixty three three touchdowns note picks. He

0:33:28.480 --> 0:33:32.320
<v Speaker 1>was sacked twice, Jordan Wilkins twenty eighty nine on the

0:33:32.320 --> 0:33:35.360
<v Speaker 1>ground for a touchdown. Niaheim Hines three catches fifty four yards,

0:33:35.360 --> 0:33:40.440
<v Speaker 1>two touchdowns. Indianapolis out possessed Detroit thirty seven, forty six

0:33:40.480 --> 0:33:44.040
<v Speaker 1>to fourteen. It's like box score weirdness all over the

0:33:44.040 --> 0:33:47.680
<v Speaker 1>place yesterday, but Baltimore Pittsburgh was the second weirdest. Only

0:33:47.720 --> 0:33:50.640
<v Speaker 1>Miami and the Rams were worse. So it's Baltimore Indianapolis.

0:33:50.680 --> 0:33:52.760
<v Speaker 1>I'll say Baltimore minus three and a half, and we'll

0:33:52.760 --> 0:33:54.560
<v Speaker 1>come back and we'll get Chrissie's answer what he's gonna

0:33:54.560 --> 0:33:56.880
<v Speaker 1>post here at the South Point next right here on

0:33:56.880 --> 0:33:59.600
<v Speaker 1>the numbers game at Visa and these sports betting network. Alright,

0:33:59.640 --> 0:34:02.040
<v Speaker 1>So the game we left off with here on guessing

0:34:02.040 --> 0:34:07.320
<v Speaker 1>lines once a gain was the Baltimore at Indianapolis game.

0:34:07.640 --> 0:34:10.080
<v Speaker 1>Indianapolis coming off a win against the Troy, Baltimore coming

0:34:10.120 --> 0:34:13.800
<v Speaker 1>off a win against Pittsburgh, but really Baltimore, as I mentioned,

0:34:13.840 --> 0:34:16.839
<v Speaker 1>to sixty five on the ground, the most rushing yards

0:34:16.840 --> 0:34:18.840
<v Speaker 1>in a loss in franchise history. But it was that

0:34:18.920 --> 0:34:22.680
<v Speaker 1>pick six early to Robert Spillane of the Steelers that

0:34:22.760 --> 0:34:25.120
<v Speaker 1>put the Ravens at a seven nothing hole. They got

0:34:25.120 --> 0:34:27.480
<v Speaker 1>out of that hole to lead seventeen to seven, but

0:34:27.520 --> 0:34:31.759
<v Speaker 1>then another terrible pick Alex Highsmith gave Big Ben a

0:34:31.800 --> 0:34:34.560
<v Speaker 1>twenty one yard short field, so basically was seventeen to

0:34:34.680 --> 0:34:37.719
<v Speaker 1>fourteen in The Steelers offense hadn't done a thing at

0:34:37.760 --> 0:34:40.719
<v Speaker 1>that point. Then they took over, but that was just

0:34:40.840 --> 0:34:44.239
<v Speaker 1>the kind of boost they needed. So I'll say Baltimore

0:34:44.400 --> 0:34:49.120
<v Speaker 1>minus three and a half. Here at Indianapolis, Chris Well,

0:34:49.120 --> 0:34:51.719
<v Speaker 1>once again, I like your number better. It's three, and

0:34:51.760 --> 0:34:55.720
<v Speaker 1>I even see three with juice on the dog. Um

0:34:55.719 --> 0:34:59.680
<v Speaker 1>My numbers come four, you know, even higher without the

0:34:59.760 --> 0:35:02.920
<v Speaker 1>home field advantage. And dare I say you have a

0:35:03.000 --> 0:35:05.919
<v Speaker 1>chance here to buy the Ravens low. Not too often

0:35:06.000 --> 0:35:08.439
<v Speaker 1>during the season you get to do that. But I'm

0:35:08.480 --> 0:35:10.200
<v Speaker 1>like you, Gil, I look at the numbers. Now that

0:35:10.520 --> 0:35:12.880
<v Speaker 1>the Steelers played a great second half, there's, you know,

0:35:13.040 --> 0:35:18.120
<v Speaker 1>strategically execution wise all that they really played well. But

0:35:18.200 --> 0:35:20.680
<v Speaker 1>don't have to estimate the Ravens. I mean, they still

0:35:20.719 --> 0:35:22.920
<v Speaker 1>had a chance to win the game on the last

0:35:23.000 --> 0:35:27.200
<v Speaker 1>play of the game. You know, so right now you

0:35:27.239 --> 0:35:30.240
<v Speaker 1>know the Ravens. Ravens lost to the Steelers, they lost

0:35:30.239 --> 0:35:34.720
<v Speaker 1>to Kansas City. Um, yeah, we take too much away

0:35:34.719 --> 0:35:37.200
<v Speaker 1>from either one of those. Um you know I have

0:35:37.280 --> 0:35:40.040
<v Speaker 1>those reading day. Well, Ravens can't win big games, blah

0:35:40.080 --> 0:35:44.000
<v Speaker 1>blah blah. I'm not so sure about that. But like

0:35:44.040 --> 0:35:45.480
<v Speaker 1>I said, they had a chance to pull out this

0:35:45.600 --> 0:35:48.799
<v Speaker 1>victory in the last play of the game, even though

0:35:48.840 --> 0:35:51.000
<v Speaker 1>I thought the Steelers really did a good job the

0:35:51.000 --> 0:35:54.359
<v Speaker 1>second half. So right now in the Colts they are

0:35:54.680 --> 0:35:57.520
<v Speaker 1>consistent and there's so much on this roster I like,

0:35:57.640 --> 0:36:01.160
<v Speaker 1>but I still just don't like Philip Rivers. Uh So

0:36:01.280 --> 0:36:04.600
<v Speaker 1>I definitely leaned towards the Ravens here. I'm gonna open

0:36:04.760 --> 0:36:07.439
<v Speaker 1>three just because if I open a three and a half,

0:36:07.480 --> 0:36:09.719
<v Speaker 1>it would be a flood, because I do see three.

0:36:09.840 --> 0:36:12.200
<v Speaker 1>Like I said with Juice in the Bog that if

0:36:12.200 --> 0:36:13.919
<v Speaker 1>you're out there playing, I think you have a chance

0:36:13.960 --> 0:36:17.279
<v Speaker 1>to get you're buying low on the Ravens, and not

0:36:17.440 --> 0:36:20.800
<v Speaker 1>too often does that happen. I would definitely put on

0:36:20.920 --> 0:36:23.319
<v Speaker 1>putting a little mark next to Ravens. I like them

0:36:23.400 --> 0:36:25.920
<v Speaker 1>this week. I agree with that assessment of the Ravens.

0:36:25.960 --> 0:36:31.760
<v Speaker 1>By by any reasonable sort of calculation, they're in the

0:36:31.760 --> 0:36:34.160
<v Speaker 1>They're in the top tier of teams in the NFL. Now,

0:36:34.200 --> 0:36:36.720
<v Speaker 1>maybe you put Kansas Central, maybe you put the Chiefs

0:36:36.719 --> 0:36:39.759
<v Speaker 1>on a tier unto themselves. Okay, maybe you do, maybe

0:36:39.760 --> 0:36:42.520
<v Speaker 1>you don't, but the Ravens are absolutely in that group

0:36:42.520 --> 0:36:45.720
<v Speaker 1>with the Steelers and the Chiefs. Uh maybe the Bucks

0:36:45.800 --> 0:36:48.080
<v Speaker 1>vying to be in that group as well. The Indianapolis

0:36:48.120 --> 0:36:49.880
<v Speaker 1>thinking you because you mentioned that one thing about Philip

0:36:49.920 --> 0:36:52.279
<v Speaker 1>Rivers twenty three or thirty three yesterday for two sixty

0:36:52.280 --> 0:36:54.799
<v Speaker 1>two and three touchdowns, Jason, you said something about Philip Rivers.

0:36:54.840 --> 0:36:57.920
<v Speaker 1>You remember what you said here off air. Well, maybe

0:36:57.920 --> 0:37:00.520
<v Speaker 1>the uh, what we were talking about the Chargers, the

0:37:00.600 --> 0:37:03.360
<v Speaker 1>Chargers problem is not a Philip Rivers problem. Yeah, so

0:37:03.400 --> 0:37:06.000
<v Speaker 1>maybe maybe we owe Philip Rivers a bit of an apology.

0:37:06.040 --> 0:37:08.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean, now, we lived through those Chargers games, so

0:37:08.280 --> 0:37:11.239
<v Speaker 1>maybe we don't. Maybe we don't. I don't know, I

0:37:11.239 --> 0:37:14.320
<v Speaker 1>don't know if we do. But he's he's certainly playing

0:37:14.400 --> 0:37:18.000
<v Speaker 1>well this year. We can give him that much. So far,

0:37:18.120 --> 0:37:20.439
<v Speaker 1>but it does feel like there's an implosion ready to happy.

0:37:20.480 --> 0:37:22.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if that's fair unfair. Let's do one

0:37:22.080 --> 0:37:26.600
<v Speaker 1>more here, uh Sunday morning. This is a tough one

0:37:26.680 --> 0:37:31.040
<v Speaker 1>Carolina at Kansas City, Carolina, kansaity. Caroline is gonna have

0:37:31.120 --> 0:37:33.719
<v Speaker 1>extra rest here. They lose to the Falcons. As we

0:37:33.800 --> 0:37:38.480
<v Speaker 1>mentioned on Thursday night, Uh, Teddy Bridgewater fifteen of twenty

0:37:38.520 --> 0:37:41.120
<v Speaker 1>three in that game for one seventy six. The Panthers

0:37:41.160 --> 0:37:42.880
<v Speaker 1>were two of ten on third down. They were one

0:37:42.880 --> 0:37:46.200
<v Speaker 1>of three on fourth down last week. So before that

0:37:46.200 --> 0:37:48.440
<v Speaker 1>Thursday night game against the Falcons, which they lost twenty

0:37:48.480 --> 0:37:52.080
<v Speaker 1>five to seventeen, as a tick of a favorite in

0:37:52.080 --> 0:37:53.279
<v Speaker 1>the end, I think there were one and a half

0:37:53.280 --> 0:37:57.239
<v Speaker 1>point closing favorites consensus. The game against the Saints the

0:37:57.280 --> 0:37:59.600
<v Speaker 1>week before, I mentioned there was that third down play

0:37:59.760 --> 0:38:02.520
<v Speaker 1>late if you recall this Jason, where it was twenty

0:38:02.520 --> 0:38:05.240
<v Speaker 1>four Saints. That was the eventual final score, and Teddy

0:38:05.280 --> 0:38:08.759
<v Speaker 1>took a sack right before the two minute warning on

0:38:08.840 --> 0:38:10.399
<v Speaker 1>third and eight, and so when they came back from

0:38:10.400 --> 0:38:12.880
<v Speaker 1>the two minute warning, Joey Sly had to kick a

0:38:12.920 --> 0:38:15.080
<v Speaker 1>sixty five yard field goal that went about sixty three

0:38:15.080 --> 0:38:17.279
<v Speaker 1>and a half yards and then the Saints got one

0:38:17.600 --> 0:38:20.399
<v Speaker 1>one first down and the game was over. This game

0:38:20.440 --> 0:38:23.800
<v Speaker 1>against the Falcons, which I got to see more Teddy

0:38:23.800 --> 0:38:26.440
<v Speaker 1>than I think I have before, at least in a

0:38:26.480 --> 0:38:30.799
<v Speaker 1>Panther's uniform. I don't know if it's him or if

0:38:30.840 --> 0:38:35.200
<v Speaker 1>nobody's getting open downfield, but he seems to there are

0:38:35.239 --> 0:38:37.560
<v Speaker 1>city Let's put it this way. I'm not sure if

0:38:37.560 --> 0:38:42.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm sold on his situational quarterbacking, if that makes any sense.

0:38:42.480 --> 0:38:44.400
<v Speaker 1>There just seems to be some plays where I'm like,

0:38:44.440 --> 0:38:46.200
<v Speaker 1>throw the ball, throw the ball and he'll eat it.

0:38:46.600 --> 0:38:48.279
<v Speaker 1>And I'm just like, I don't know if that's you know,

0:38:48.320 --> 0:38:50.279
<v Speaker 1>but at some point you gotta know when to throw

0:38:50.360 --> 0:38:52.759
<v Speaker 1>the ball. So that's my That's my little knock on

0:38:52.800 --> 0:38:56.960
<v Speaker 1>Teddy Bridgewater who otherwise I love. Kansas City. Uh, no surprise.

0:38:56.960 --> 0:38:59.799
<v Speaker 1>They beat the Jets yesterday as nineteen and a half

0:39:00.200 --> 0:39:04.360
<v Speaker 1>favorites and they cover in the process. About that. Patrick

0:39:04.400 --> 0:39:08.840
<v Speaker 1>Mahomes thirty one forty two for four sixteen five touchdowns,

0:39:08.920 --> 0:39:11.120
<v Speaker 1>no picks, He wasn't sacked. Kelsey eight for one on

0:39:11.239 --> 0:39:14.840
<v Speaker 1>nine at a touchdown Tyreek f two touchdowns. Uh. The

0:39:14.920 --> 0:39:18.000
<v Speaker 1>Chiefs only needed fifty rushing yards. Gotta respect Andy Reid.

0:39:18.120 --> 0:39:20.600
<v Speaker 1>Like you know we're saying before about the Vikings that

0:39:20.719 --> 0:39:25.400
<v Speaker 1>Kirk Cousins was eleven of fourteen. Well, the Vikings realized that, Like,

0:39:25.440 --> 0:39:27.719
<v Speaker 1>we're just gonna keep giving Dalvin Cook the ball. I

0:39:27.840 --> 0:39:29.919
<v Speaker 1>love when an NFL team does that, right, don't try

0:39:29.960 --> 0:39:32.560
<v Speaker 1>to outsmart yourself. Just keep doing it till they stop it.

0:39:33.080 --> 0:39:37.239
<v Speaker 1>Chiefs very much a Belichick in game by game, what

0:39:37.280 --> 0:39:40.080
<v Speaker 1>do we need to do in this particular game to

0:39:40.280 --> 0:39:43.640
<v Speaker 1>beat this particular team. Now, they did waste a punt return,

0:39:43.840 --> 0:39:46.920
<v Speaker 1>excuse me, a fake punt play for no particular reason.

0:39:47.160 --> 0:39:49.839
<v Speaker 1>But other than that, um, they outgained the Jets four

0:39:50.000 --> 0:39:54.440
<v Speaker 1>nine six to two twenty one. So that's that's pretty dominant.

0:39:54.480 --> 0:39:59.319
<v Speaker 1>All that said, if it's I don't know, I'm gonna

0:39:59.320 --> 0:40:04.759
<v Speaker 1>be wrong on this, I said, Casey minus ten. Yeah,

0:40:04.800 --> 0:40:06.960
<v Speaker 1>you're a little light that The reason I thought this

0:40:07.040 --> 0:40:09.080
<v Speaker 1>was tough as I think McCaffrey is gonna be back

0:40:09.120 --> 0:40:12.440
<v Speaker 1>for this. He will be And how much does he mean?

0:40:12.480 --> 0:40:14.399
<v Speaker 1>Because he has missed quite a bit. But I think

0:40:14.440 --> 0:40:18.719
<v Speaker 1>the kid is just a super dynamic player. Uh, you know,

0:40:19.080 --> 0:40:23.400
<v Speaker 1>Carolina was one of those teams I was showing signs,

0:40:23.440 --> 0:40:26.120
<v Speaker 1>in my mind, showing signs of them really getting into

0:40:26.120 --> 0:40:29.359
<v Speaker 1>the playoff hunt playing some pretty good football. You know. Now,

0:40:29.480 --> 0:40:31.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm not so sure. And I've been a big Petty

0:40:31.680 --> 0:40:34.120
<v Speaker 1>fan ever since he was at Louis Bill. I love

0:40:34.200 --> 0:40:37.240
<v Speaker 1>the kid. Was devastated when he had that devastating injury.

0:40:37.960 --> 0:40:39.759
<v Speaker 1>He's come back pretty good. The last couple of games

0:40:39.760 --> 0:40:42.040
<v Speaker 1>not quite so good. So maybe they're figuring this guy

0:40:42.040 --> 0:40:44.360
<v Speaker 1>out a little bit. And you know, Matt Rule, a

0:40:44.400 --> 0:40:48.160
<v Speaker 1>guy who's as a college coach, I think really did well.

0:40:49.280 --> 0:40:53.560
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes that transfers the pros. Sometimes it doesn't. Anyway, my

0:40:53.760 --> 0:40:58.960
<v Speaker 1>numbers here come to twelve without any home field I

0:40:59.000 --> 0:41:03.000
<v Speaker 1>don't give the Sheets a big home field here. Again,

0:41:03.000 --> 0:41:05.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm going the one word, the one phrase. Guys who

0:41:05.520 --> 0:41:08.080
<v Speaker 1>go up to hear me say diminishing returns. You know.

0:41:08.200 --> 0:41:10.799
<v Speaker 1>So I think I think eleven and a half. Then

0:41:11.160 --> 0:41:12.960
<v Speaker 1>between eleven half swell and alf I'm gonna go right

0:41:12.960 --> 0:41:16.480
<v Speaker 1>in the middle of twelve. Um. I think the Chiefs

0:41:16.680 --> 0:41:19.839
<v Speaker 1>probably could sleep walk through this game and win it.

0:41:19.920 --> 0:41:21.440
<v Speaker 1>And I don't know if they cover, and not that

0:41:21.800 --> 0:41:24.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't think this is just a huge game for them.

0:41:24.640 --> 0:41:27.920
<v Speaker 1>You know, some I think twelves. Okay, but I think

0:41:27.920 --> 0:41:29.680
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna be an interesting game to watch most of us.

0:41:29.719 --> 0:41:32.000
<v Speaker 1>I want to see mccafoye coming back and see what

0:41:32.120 --> 0:41:35.440
<v Speaker 1>kind of difference he makes on this team, because it

0:41:35.480 --> 0:41:38.040
<v Speaker 1>could be nothing after all this time, but it could

0:41:38.080 --> 0:41:40.359
<v Speaker 1>be a lot too because he is a superporter. Well

0:41:40.360 --> 0:41:41.960
<v Speaker 1>you said it. I mean, that's gonna be the thing

0:41:42.000 --> 0:41:44.319
<v Speaker 1>with all these big chief spreads when they're at home.

0:41:44.960 --> 0:41:47.200
<v Speaker 1>You know, they might just they could name their score

0:41:47.200 --> 0:41:48.839
<v Speaker 1>if they want to, and then they could just lollygag

0:41:48.840 --> 0:41:51.040
<v Speaker 1>their way through it, right fall asleep on a sleepwalk,

0:41:51.120 --> 0:41:54.040
<v Speaker 1>as he said. So that's why it's tough to play.

0:41:54.160 --> 0:41:55.840
<v Speaker 1>And then you know, are they really going to go

0:41:55.960 --> 0:41:58.840
<v Speaker 1>fifteen and one? What's the game from here to the

0:41:58.960 --> 0:42:00.640
<v Speaker 1>end of the year that they're just a sleepwalk to

0:42:00.680 --> 0:42:03.120
<v Speaker 1>the point where they don't end up winning it? Um,

0:42:03.160 --> 0:42:05.400
<v Speaker 1>there's always that possibility. I don't know if it's this

0:42:05.400 --> 0:42:07.720
<v Speaker 1>week or not, but you're right, it's gonna be a

0:42:07.719 --> 0:42:11.200
<v Speaker 1>A Christian McCaffrey led a Carolina team in this one.

0:42:11.239 --> 0:42:13.640
<v Speaker 1>So what's the final number of Kansas City? What minus?

0:42:14.880 --> 0:42:18.799
<v Speaker 1>I mean? Okay, I think we have one more early game,

0:42:19.040 --> 0:42:23.120
<v Speaker 1>one more early I believe, Uh do oh two one,

0:42:23.360 --> 0:42:29.080
<v Speaker 1>what's next? Let's do one more here? Houston at Jacksonville. Okay,

0:42:29.080 --> 0:42:30.520
<v Speaker 1>well this won't take a long and we only have

0:42:30.560 --> 0:42:33.680
<v Speaker 1>a couple of minutes. Houston, Uh, Houston coming off of

0:42:33.760 --> 0:42:36.279
<v Speaker 1>bye Jacksonville coming off of by two teams coming off

0:42:36.320 --> 0:42:39.560
<v Speaker 1>of bye um and this will be now. So Gardner

0:42:39.600 --> 0:42:43.839
<v Speaker 1>Minshew has multiple fractures. We were talking about this last week.

0:42:44.040 --> 0:42:46.560
<v Speaker 1>He didn't tell the Jaguars he multiple fractures in his

0:42:46.600 --> 0:42:50.479
<v Speaker 1>throwing hand. And so this is probably Mike Glennan going

0:42:50.640 --> 0:42:54.920
<v Speaker 1>for the Jaguars in this game. And so that alone,

0:42:57.239 --> 0:43:00.239
<v Speaker 1>I mean that alone would make it Houston minus way

0:43:00.239 --> 0:43:03.000
<v Speaker 1>more points than I would have imagined if it was Minshew,

0:43:03.120 --> 0:43:06.279
<v Speaker 1>because I think there is Minshew. Was you know, from

0:43:06.320 --> 0:43:08.200
<v Speaker 1>from Minshew to Glennon does that mean anything? I think

0:43:08.239 --> 0:43:10.920
<v Speaker 1>it probably means a couple of points sight unseen. We

0:43:10.920 --> 0:43:12.719
<v Speaker 1>don't know what Mike glenn Or is or is Jon

0:43:12.760 --> 0:43:15.960
<v Speaker 1>Gruden famously called him Mike glenn On. We don't know

0:43:16.000 --> 0:43:18.400
<v Speaker 1>what he's about at this point, So I'll say Houston

0:43:19.080 --> 0:43:25.279
<v Speaker 1>is Houston minus six too many? Oh well, no, it's

0:43:25.360 --> 0:43:28.239
<v Speaker 1>not used to be six and a half. Pretty much

0:43:28.239 --> 0:43:34.680
<v Speaker 1>painted on no real difference in geez my members come. Yeah,

0:43:34.719 --> 0:43:37.000
<v Speaker 1>I'll play a true if I liked it even higher

0:43:37.040 --> 0:43:39.880
<v Speaker 1>because Mike Glenn on I'm not a big fan of

0:43:40.600 --> 0:43:43.600
<v Speaker 1>and Minshew, yeah, they started figuring him out. But I

0:43:43.600 --> 0:43:47.200
<v Speaker 1>gotta tell you, before the season we're talking about Jacksonville

0:43:47.239 --> 0:43:50.879
<v Speaker 1>being abysmally bad, and they started out with a win

0:43:51.000 --> 0:43:53.160
<v Speaker 1>and I think kind of threw us off a little bit.

0:43:53.560 --> 0:43:56.640
<v Speaker 1>But I think they're coming back down to earth, are

0:43:56.680 --> 0:44:00.000
<v Speaker 1>coming back down to where we thought they would be. Uh,

0:44:00.080 --> 0:44:02.360
<v Speaker 1>you know with Mike glenn and like that. My numbers

0:44:02.440 --> 0:44:05.480
<v Speaker 1>because I gave him two points between him and Minshew,

0:44:06.719 --> 0:44:09.600
<v Speaker 1>my numbers will be the Texans eight with no home

0:44:09.600 --> 0:44:12.680
<v Speaker 1>field advantage, and jackson will not had much of my

0:44:12.760 --> 0:44:15.200
<v Speaker 1>home field manage. I gotta tell you, even in the

0:44:15.239 --> 0:44:19.399
<v Speaker 1>best of times, Um, I guess I guess the six

0:44:19.440 --> 0:44:22.160
<v Speaker 1>and apps okay, but tell you to if I saw seven,

0:44:22.200 --> 0:44:25.600
<v Speaker 1>I probably go to seven. I think Texans are hungry

0:44:25.640 --> 0:44:27.520
<v Speaker 1>for a win, and they found a team that I

0:44:27.520 --> 0:44:29.920
<v Speaker 1>think they could beat up there. Like I kind of

0:44:30.000 --> 0:44:32.000
<v Speaker 1>I kind of like the Texans a little bit hatlan

0:44:33.120 --> 0:44:35.680
<v Speaker 1>uh chalk on the road, But I think the Texans

0:44:35.680 --> 0:44:37.480
<v Speaker 1>found the team that they may be able to take

0:44:37.520 --> 0:44:40.560
<v Speaker 1>that their frustrations on. I do respect Jacksonville's fight though

0:44:40.600 --> 0:44:44.680
<v Speaker 1>they show up for these games. Um Gardner Minshew not

0:44:44.880 --> 0:44:48.479
<v Speaker 1>keeping it, I mean keeping it from his team. Bad

0:44:48.520 --> 0:44:50.759
<v Speaker 1>co worker Jason picks up a check, but bad co

0:44:50.840 --> 0:44:54.440
<v Speaker 1>worker can't do that. It's used to minus six and

0:44:54.480 --> 0:44:56.560
<v Speaker 1>a half. We'll come back guess some more lines right

0:44:56.600 --> 0:44:58.920
<v Speaker 1>here in the numbers game. At Visa these sports betting network.

0:45:18.800 --> 0:45:21.440
<v Speaker 1>Did you miss a Vison show? We have multiple daily

0:45:21.480 --> 0:45:24.359
<v Speaker 1>and weekly podcasts keep you up to date on all

0:45:24.440 --> 0:45:27.480
<v Speaker 1>the latest sports betting actions. Vis In Best Bets bring

0:45:27.480 --> 0:45:30.480
<v Speaker 1>you the highlights for daily line of shows, including Follows

0:45:30.480 --> 0:45:33.360
<v Speaker 1>the Money and a Numbers Game. Market Insights with Josh

0:45:33.400 --> 0:45:35.880
<v Speaker 1>Applebong gets you ready with the latest lines of action

0:45:36.120 --> 0:45:38.919
<v Speaker 1>being The Book with Jale Alexander provides the insider view

0:45:38.960 --> 0:45:42.800
<v Speaker 1>on analytics based betting strategy from professional matters, handy coppers

0:45:42.880 --> 0:45:45.680
<v Speaker 1>and sports book Operates. Is a Visa dot Com slash

0:45:45.719 --> 0:45:49.000
<v Speaker 1>podcast today to find all of our podcast auctions new

0:45:49.040 --> 0:45:51.280
<v Speaker 1>to Visa. The best way to learn more about sports

0:45:51.280 --> 0:45:53.399
<v Speaker 1>betting and how Vison can help you is to sign

0:45:53.480 --> 0:45:56.000
<v Speaker 1>up for our free daily email. You'll receive an email

0:45:56.040 --> 0:45:59.160
<v Speaker 1>every morning with show highlights and expert insights. Sign up

0:45:59.200 --> 0:46:01.640
<v Speaker 1>for free today at Visa dot com slash email. That's

0:46:01.719 --> 0:46:04.440
<v Speaker 1>B s I N dot com slash email. If you

0:46:04.480 --> 0:46:06.560
<v Speaker 1>didn't catch bevis in last week, here's some of what

0:46:06.640 --> 0:46:09.040
<v Speaker 1>you missed. So here's your updated. Now new favorite to

0:46:09.040 --> 0:46:10.480
<v Speaker 1>win the AP Coach of the Year. This is that

0:46:10.560 --> 0:46:13.600
<v Speaker 1>a global book. Mike Tomlin Steelers coaches the new favorite

0:46:13.640 --> 0:46:15.920
<v Speaker 1>at six to one, as that team is now undefeated.

0:46:15.960 --> 0:46:20.840
<v Speaker 1>Still quite the conundrum because he's a players coach. The

0:46:20.920 --> 0:46:23.920
<v Speaker 1>guy's love and respect him. He's a saint and an

0:46:23.960 --> 0:46:26.719
<v Speaker 1>angel for when you see the issues that Bell and

0:46:26.760 --> 0:46:29.719
<v Speaker 1>Antonio Brown have had that they've never had issues there

0:46:29.760 --> 0:46:33.200
<v Speaker 1>in Pittsburgh and how everything worked out in team chemistry.

0:46:33.640 --> 0:46:36.920
<v Speaker 1>But he's you know, he's kind of a weird with

0:46:37.000 --> 0:46:39.479
<v Speaker 1>the raw rod, some of the cliches after the game,

0:46:40.360 --> 0:46:45.640
<v Speaker 1>but it's struggles with clock and game management and strategy.

0:46:45.800 --> 0:46:48.600
<v Speaker 1>But they're always in the mix. Yeah, And it's also

0:46:49.120 --> 0:46:51.560
<v Speaker 1>you get different answers when you talk to hardcore Steeler

0:46:51.640 --> 0:46:55.640
<v Speaker 1>fans about what they think. I love him, so I

0:46:55.719 --> 0:46:59.000
<v Speaker 1>thought he should have been fired years ago. John Harball

0:46:59.040 --> 0:47:00.560
<v Speaker 1>is now the second shot in the board. At seven

0:47:00.560 --> 0:47:05.560
<v Speaker 1>to one, I'm not so sure. Last year, Yeah, yeah,

0:47:05.600 --> 0:47:10.960
<v Speaker 1>Bruce Arians plus seven fifty. That's that's interesting too. I

0:47:11.000 --> 0:47:13.719
<v Speaker 1>can't get there with that one either, because they have

0:47:13.800 --> 0:47:15.719
<v Speaker 1>so many weapons. I mean, who was going to be

0:47:15.760 --> 0:47:18.640
<v Speaker 1>surprised if he asked someone in August if Tampa was

0:47:18.640 --> 0:47:21.160
<v Speaker 1>gonna go twolve and four and when the division everyone

0:47:21.160 --> 0:47:23.359
<v Speaker 1>would have raised their hand. I said, Okay, at least

0:47:23.640 --> 0:47:26.920
<v Speaker 1>I certainly buy that Tom and his toys. I mean,

0:47:26.920 --> 0:47:29.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't. I don't think Arians should get decredit that

0:47:29.239 --> 0:47:31.879
<v Speaker 1>much credit for what's going on. The other thing. They

0:47:31.960 --> 0:47:33.719
<v Speaker 1>want seven games. Last year they had a quarterback who

0:47:33.719 --> 0:47:37.080
<v Speaker 1>through thirty interceptions, Right, so Tom doesn't turn it over. Yeah,

0:47:37.120 --> 0:47:39.520
<v Speaker 1>So immediately you think, okay, that's problem of problems fixed

0:47:39.520 --> 0:47:42.160
<v Speaker 1>from day one, right, you eliminated those massive problems, and

0:47:42.200 --> 0:47:43.719
<v Speaker 1>all of a sudden, hey, we're talking about it. Maybe

0:47:43.719 --> 0:47:47.120
<v Speaker 1>division winner or a playoff team Andy Reid, Mike Greable

0:47:47.200 --> 0:47:50.799
<v Speaker 1>or each eight to one was plus five seventy five.

0:47:51.120 --> 0:47:52.719
<v Speaker 1>They do change, by the way, the EIDs go back

0:47:52.760 --> 0:47:54.600
<v Speaker 1>and forth every week depending on a win in a loss.

0:47:55.280 --> 0:47:58.239
<v Speaker 1>Stefanski and Kingsbury, along with Rivera are nine to one.

0:47:59.000 --> 0:48:01.200
<v Speaker 1>Flores Is tenal on with the floor. My guy Matt

0:48:01.280 --> 0:48:11.360
<v Speaker 1>rules down to one globally, it's a numbers games, Gil Alexander,

0:48:12.200 --> 0:48:15.800
<v Speaker 1>want to believe in limits our number two of a

0:48:15.880 --> 0:48:17.600
<v Speaker 1>numbers game right here in Visa and the Sports Betting

0:48:17.600 --> 0:48:19.839
<v Speaker 1>Network series x UP, Channel two, O four, Visa dot Com,

0:48:19.880 --> 0:48:22.480
<v Speaker 1>the Visa that boot Boa Slinging Game Plus it is

0:48:22.520 --> 0:48:25.040
<v Speaker 1>Gil Alexander. Jason conn is here as well, producing number

0:48:25.480 --> 0:48:28.160
<v Speaker 1>seven and Christie Andrews of course from the South Point

0:48:28.200 --> 0:48:32.640
<v Speaker 1>Hotel Casino sports book. Chrissy, where you're able to vote? Uh?

0:48:32.840 --> 0:48:36.120
<v Speaker 1>When when you went down with the COVID, did that

0:48:36.200 --> 0:48:38.680
<v Speaker 1>sort of put a stop to your voting plans? Were

0:48:38.760 --> 0:48:42.319
<v Speaker 1>able to get out the vote? Oh? No, I voted early,

0:48:42.680 --> 0:48:46.600
<v Speaker 1>voted early, Yeah, drop off. Yeah, that's the way to

0:48:46.680 --> 0:48:51.320
<v Speaker 1>go almost a hundred million Americans. Uh. We'll talk election

0:48:51.400 --> 0:48:54.480
<v Speaker 1>betting tomorrow on election Day, and we'll talk about it

0:48:54.560 --> 0:48:56.920
<v Speaker 1>Wednesday as well. Uh see if I can't get Mac

0:48:56.960 --> 0:48:59.320
<v Speaker 1>for standing back on the show and Pamela maldon on

0:48:59.400 --> 0:49:02.880
<v Speaker 1>and we'll talk about all that big big day tomorrow,

0:49:02.880 --> 0:49:08.480
<v Speaker 1>twenty four hours away from the presidential election. All right, Chrissy,

0:49:08.880 --> 0:49:12.640
<v Speaker 1>one more in the morning. I'm led to believe it. Yeah,

0:49:12.719 --> 0:49:14.360
<v Speaker 1>let me throw something. And I got a friend of

0:49:14.360 --> 0:49:17.840
<v Speaker 1>mine from Australia who works for a bookmaking up. He

0:49:17.960 --> 0:49:20.080
<v Speaker 1>sent me their figures on what they're doing on the

0:49:20.120 --> 0:49:25.359
<v Speaker 1>American UH election presidential election. Oh wait, chw I mean

0:49:27.120 --> 0:49:29.680
<v Speaker 1>if we get booked here, it would make it would

0:49:29.800 --> 0:49:32.719
<v Speaker 1>dwarf the super Bowl like you can't believe. I mean

0:49:32.760 --> 0:49:35.920
<v Speaker 1>in Australia they got big, big numbers on this. So

0:49:36.320 --> 0:49:38.439
<v Speaker 1>where where do you by the way, you are willing?

0:49:38.520 --> 0:49:40.200
<v Speaker 1>Are you willing to share those numbers or you don't

0:49:40.200 --> 0:49:42.759
<v Speaker 1>want to share those numbers? I don't want to share

0:49:42.800 --> 0:49:44.680
<v Speaker 1>him no, because he sent him to me in confidence.

0:49:45.200 --> 0:49:48.719
<v Speaker 1>We're they're huge. Where do you stand on that? Like,

0:49:48.840 --> 0:49:51.040
<v Speaker 1>would you be okay with that? Morally speaking? Would you

0:49:51.040 --> 0:49:53.040
<v Speaker 1>be okay with a bookmaking side? I would imagine you'd

0:49:53.080 --> 0:49:58.439
<v Speaker 1>love it, But like you you'd be okay with doing it? Oh? Absolutely?

0:49:58.520 --> 0:50:00.920
<v Speaker 1>And if anybody has a chance. You know, Jimmy Viccara

0:50:01.040 --> 0:50:03.959
<v Speaker 1>this before I went to the South Point. So someone

0:50:04.000 --> 0:50:08.200
<v Speaker 1>around fifteen or sixteen the Daily Show had Jimmy on

0:50:08.360 --> 0:50:10.879
<v Speaker 1>and I was afraid because you know, Daily Show could

0:50:10.880 --> 0:50:13.160
<v Speaker 1>have a lot of guys on back when Stewart was

0:50:13.200 --> 0:50:15.719
<v Speaker 1>on the show and kind of make you look like

0:50:15.760 --> 0:50:19.560
<v Speaker 1>a fool, you know, And they did not make Jimmy

0:50:19.560 --> 0:50:21.520
<v Speaker 1>look like a fool, matter of fact, looked like the

0:50:21.600 --> 0:50:24.080
<v Speaker 1>stage that we know that he is. And he talked

0:50:24.080 --> 0:50:26.880
<v Speaker 1>about betting on the presidential election. And one point that

0:50:26.960 --> 0:50:30.759
<v Speaker 1>he made, which I think is a percent true, if

0:50:30.760 --> 0:50:32.920
<v Speaker 1>he had betting on the election, first of all, to

0:50:32.920 --> 0:50:35.640
<v Speaker 1>be impossible to fix. You know, well, I shouldn't say that.

0:50:35.880 --> 0:50:39.640
<v Speaker 1>Food might be listening, but it was, you know, as

0:50:39.640 --> 0:50:45.200
<v Speaker 1>far as as he loves the show, Yeah, yeah, he's

0:50:45.239 --> 0:50:49.360
<v Speaker 1>looking for value the NFL. Uh. But you know what

0:50:49.400 --> 0:50:53.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm saying, if you had, if you had betting on it,

0:50:53.600 --> 0:50:56.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean, if you bet your hundred bucks on whoever,

0:50:56.680 --> 0:50:59.719
<v Speaker 1>you would get out and vote. Oh yeah, there's no

0:51:00.000 --> 0:51:03.000
<v Speaker 1>out about it. And that's and that was Jimmy's point.

0:51:03.040 --> 0:51:05.640
<v Speaker 1>I think he made it, and I think you can

0:51:05.640 --> 0:51:09.800
<v Speaker 1>go find it on YouTube. Jimmy's little episode, little segment

0:51:09.880 --> 0:51:12.160
<v Speaker 1>on the Daily Show. It's very good. Like I said,

0:51:12.160 --> 0:51:14.680
<v Speaker 1>he he comes across as the stage that we know

0:51:14.760 --> 0:51:18.760
<v Speaker 1>that he is. Well, he's been sayings and I think, yeah,

0:51:18.800 --> 0:51:21.560
<v Speaker 1>he's been saying it for years and listen, I made

0:51:21.560 --> 0:51:25.239
<v Speaker 1>a decision very early in right, this show has we

0:51:25.320 --> 0:51:28.880
<v Speaker 1>have been unabashed talking about election betting eight politically speaking,

0:51:29.080 --> 0:51:30.640
<v Speaker 1>and I know there's always gonna be a segment of

0:51:30.640 --> 0:51:33.719
<v Speaker 1>the of the listenership that's like this guy that you

0:51:33.800 --> 0:51:36.480
<v Speaker 1>had on was completely you know, and it's like, no, no,

0:51:36.560 --> 0:51:38.439
<v Speaker 1>he wasn't. You know. We're just trying to be as

0:51:38.880 --> 0:51:40.600
<v Speaker 1>as a political as possible. We're just trying to make

0:51:40.600 --> 0:51:45.080
<v Speaker 1>money and regardless of what your politics might be. And

0:51:45.239 --> 0:51:48.040
<v Speaker 1>there's always a segment out there, there's always a sliver.

0:51:48.200 --> 0:51:50.279
<v Speaker 1>You're always going to hear the vocal minorities like, oh,

0:51:50.360 --> 0:51:53.640
<v Speaker 1>stick to sports, right all that. Uh No, I'm not

0:51:53.680 --> 0:51:56.520
<v Speaker 1>going to stick to sports because authentically, and this show

0:51:56.560 --> 0:52:00.800
<v Speaker 1>has been nothing but authentic through the years. The most

0:52:00.960 --> 0:52:03.399
<v Speaker 1>that I and my buddies, the most that we talk

0:52:03.480 --> 0:52:07.640
<v Speaker 1>about besides football betting or basketball or baseball, whatever is

0:52:07.640 --> 0:52:11.160
<v Speaker 1>the sport at that moment, is political betting. That is

0:52:11.239 --> 0:52:14.719
<v Speaker 1>the thing that is the thread that under that, that

0:52:14.840 --> 0:52:18.879
<v Speaker 1>lies underneath it all throughout, regardless of what sport has

0:52:18.880 --> 0:52:21.800
<v Speaker 1>gone on, and it is some of the most fascinating

0:52:22.480 --> 0:52:26.440
<v Speaker 1>betting arcs and betting analysis that you can get. And

0:52:26.520 --> 0:52:31.160
<v Speaker 1>so I hope people have gotten that this year that um,

0:52:31.680 --> 0:52:35.359
<v Speaker 1>I really believe four years from now everybody's gonna talk

0:52:35.400 --> 0:52:37.600
<v Speaker 1>openly about it. And by the way, I'll tell you

0:52:37.600 --> 0:52:40.600
<v Speaker 1>about the podcast numbers. We So the difference between this

0:52:41.120 --> 0:52:45.040
<v Speaker 1>pulling back the curtain a little bit Guessing Lines and

0:52:45.440 --> 0:52:48.279
<v Speaker 1>the political show that we did last week, which was

0:52:48.320 --> 0:52:50.480
<v Speaker 1>an hour long again with Mac for stand again and

0:52:50.480 --> 0:52:54.040
<v Speaker 1>Pamela Maldonado did a fabulous job on the show. Um,

0:52:54.080 --> 0:52:58.600
<v Speaker 1>we put them in podcast form as well. Now they're

0:52:58.719 --> 0:53:01.680
<v Speaker 1>just shy essing lines on the political show were just

0:53:01.760 --> 0:53:04.120
<v Speaker 1>shy of Megapod numbers. But keep in mind the megapod

0:53:04.239 --> 0:53:08.719
<v Speaker 1>doesn't air on Visa in so Guessing Lines and the

0:53:08.719 --> 0:53:12.160
<v Speaker 1>Political show had the disadvantage, if you will, disadvantage in

0:53:12.200 --> 0:53:15.239
<v Speaker 1>quotes of having aired once and then it goes to podcasts,

0:53:15.280 --> 0:53:17.239
<v Speaker 1>so it's it's like a rebroadcast. And by the way,

0:53:17.280 --> 0:53:19.400
<v Speaker 1>it's kill Alexander, it's Chrissy Andrews right here on a

0:53:19.480 --> 0:53:21.840
<v Speaker 1>numbers game at Visa and the sports spending Network Serious

0:53:21.920 --> 0:53:24.040
<v Speaker 1>XM Channel two oh four, Visa dot Com the Visa

0:53:24.080 --> 0:53:27.759
<v Speaker 1>have foodbo slinging game plus uh talking Guessing Lines week nine,

0:53:27.760 --> 0:53:31.120
<v Speaker 1>which will resume here momentarily, But just to let people know.

0:53:31.520 --> 0:53:33.520
<v Speaker 1>And that's why I always I always listen to people

0:53:33.640 --> 0:53:35.799
<v Speaker 1>or always read people on Twitter sort of smiling, I'm like,

0:53:35.960 --> 0:53:37.640
<v Speaker 1>let me send you the podcast numbers, and then you

0:53:37.640 --> 0:53:39.040
<v Speaker 1>get back to me. And you think, if people are

0:53:39.040 --> 0:53:42.319
<v Speaker 1>interested in this, because that political show was comparable to

0:53:42.400 --> 0:53:45.839
<v Speaker 1>a guessing line show, so people have a thirst for

0:53:45.960 --> 0:53:49.799
<v Speaker 1>it in a way that, uh, in case you're doubting it,

0:53:50.400 --> 0:53:52.680
<v Speaker 1>you shouldn't doubt it. And so I think that all

0:53:52.760 --> 0:53:54.640
<v Speaker 1>lends into is there a thirst for than the audience?

0:53:54.680 --> 0:53:57.640
<v Speaker 1>There absolutely is, And I'm not saying to do it

0:53:57.719 --> 0:53:59.560
<v Speaker 1>every two years. I don't think people are gonna care

0:53:59.560 --> 0:54:03.520
<v Speaker 1>about mid terms, right, but presidential elections different story. Anyway.

0:54:03.560 --> 0:54:05.399
<v Speaker 1>That's my two cents on and the numbers bear it out.

0:54:05.719 --> 0:54:08.160
<v Speaker 1>So we won't do a politics show here. Christ In

0:54:08.160 --> 0:54:09.839
<v Speaker 1>case you were getting worried that that's what we're gonna do,

0:54:11.160 --> 0:54:14.200
<v Speaker 1>you're like, Okay, I want to say, though I listened

0:54:14.200 --> 0:54:16.160
<v Speaker 1>to that show you did with those two last week.

0:54:16.200 --> 0:54:18.600
<v Speaker 1>It was very good, very very good. They were outstanding.

0:54:18.640 --> 0:54:21.560
<v Speaker 1>I really enjoyed that. Yeah, those two were great. All right,

0:54:21.719 --> 0:54:24.160
<v Speaker 1>let's get back to I think one more one more

0:54:24.200 --> 0:54:30.680
<v Speaker 1>morning game, Yes, the New York Football Giants at your

0:54:30.880 --> 0:54:35.200
<v Speaker 1>Washington football team New York hasn't played. They played a

0:54:35.320 --> 0:54:38.600
<v Speaker 1>night against the Buccaneers again. That is my fifth contest pick.

0:54:38.640 --> 0:54:44.279
<v Speaker 1>I'm three and one headed into tonight again. Um hits

0:54:44.280 --> 0:54:46.720
<v Speaker 1>on Minnesota, Denver, and Pittsburgh, but lost on New Orleans.

0:54:46.719 --> 0:54:48.799
<v Speaker 1>So Tampa Bay is is who I'm on tonight. Also

0:54:48.840 --> 0:54:50.920
<v Speaker 1>have them to close out a bunch of teasers. Tampa

0:54:50.920 --> 0:54:54.000
<v Speaker 1>Bay right now a thirteen point favorite. Wow, that's going

0:54:54.040 --> 0:54:56.600
<v Speaker 1>all the way up to thirteen. But you figure the

0:54:56.640 --> 0:54:58.840
<v Speaker 1>Bucks get kind of name their score tonight. So the

0:54:58.920 --> 0:55:02.719
<v Speaker 1>Giants will be on short rest against Washington, and Washington

0:55:02.800 --> 0:55:06.000
<v Speaker 1>will be coming off of by Washington will have a

0:55:06.080 --> 0:55:08.279
<v Speaker 1>week's rest, so it will it will be a completely

0:55:08.320 --> 0:55:11.120
<v Speaker 1>different situation for both teams, the Giants getting the worst

0:55:11.120 --> 0:55:13.600
<v Speaker 1>of that. And uh, it's in d C. You said,

0:55:13.680 --> 0:55:15.359
<v Speaker 1>Is that correct or? Or I should say at Ral

0:55:15.480 --> 0:55:19.239
<v Speaker 1>John outside of d C. Lovely Ral John as he

0:55:19.320 --> 0:55:21.799
<v Speaker 1>was called by a John ken Cook, named after his

0:55:21.840 --> 0:55:24.960
<v Speaker 1>two sons back in the day. Worst traffic arteries you're

0:55:24.960 --> 0:55:28.520
<v Speaker 1>all find into a stadium. I'll say, Washington, this to

0:55:28.600 --> 0:55:30.480
<v Speaker 1>me is more than a field goal. Like I know

0:55:30.520 --> 0:55:32.520
<v Speaker 1>it would be very lazy people like minus three. I'm

0:55:32.560 --> 0:55:35.840
<v Speaker 1>gonna say Washington minus four and a half. I think there.

0:55:36.320 --> 0:55:38.640
<v Speaker 1>I think they're a better football team than the Giants.

0:55:38.640 --> 0:55:41.759
<v Speaker 1>I realized they lost last time Ron Rivera going for

0:55:41.840 --> 0:55:44.520
<v Speaker 1>two down one late. I think. I think there's a

0:55:44.520 --> 0:55:49.960
<v Speaker 1>potential for Washington to roll in this game. Yeah, my

0:55:50.120 --> 0:55:54.560
<v Speaker 1>power ratings would be much closer to a three or

0:55:54.600 --> 0:55:58.120
<v Speaker 1>even a little lower. But the situation I think is

0:55:58.239 --> 0:56:01.600
<v Speaker 1>in Washington. Save by the way, numbers three and a half, Okay,

0:56:01.920 --> 0:56:04.280
<v Speaker 1>I see a couple of threes with pretty big juice

0:56:04.280 --> 0:56:07.719
<v Speaker 1>on the savings. I'm gonna open three and athletics that

0:56:08.640 --> 0:56:10.480
<v Speaker 1>one team coming off short rest and the other team

0:56:10.520 --> 0:56:12.680
<v Speaker 1>coming off a bye. Yeah, I don't know why in

0:56:12.719 --> 0:56:18.279
<v Speaker 1>the NFL does that just weird? Especially Yeah for division game. Yes,

0:56:18.360 --> 0:56:21.600
<v Speaker 1>so I think the situation, you know, forget the power ratings,

0:56:21.840 --> 0:56:25.600
<v Speaker 1>uh that sort of thing, the situation really favors Washington

0:56:25.680 --> 0:56:27.880
<v Speaker 1>in this spot. So I don't have any trouble with

0:56:27.920 --> 0:56:30.720
<v Speaker 1>the three and a half. So that's what I'm gonna open.

0:56:31.520 --> 0:56:34.919
<v Speaker 1>I think maybe I don't know numbers wise, like I said,

0:56:34.920 --> 0:56:37.560
<v Speaker 1>it looks high, but the situation, I think it's greatly

0:56:37.560 --> 0:56:40.640
<v Speaker 1>in Washington's favor. So three and act it looks okay, Yeah,

0:56:40.760 --> 0:56:43.360
<v Speaker 1>that might be a play for me on Washington. Washington

0:56:43.440 --> 0:56:47.000
<v Speaker 1>would be an interesting survivor pick next week. Like if

0:56:47.040 --> 0:56:50.560
<v Speaker 1>you don't have if you don't have the Chiefs available

0:56:50.600 --> 0:56:54.200
<v Speaker 1>to you. Um, I don't know what else game Thanksgiving

0:56:54.239 --> 0:56:57.399
<v Speaker 1>team though they are Washington is a Thanksgiving team. That's

0:56:57.440 --> 0:57:00.600
<v Speaker 1>a great point. Yeah, Washington is a thing skiving teams,

0:57:00.600 --> 0:57:04.319
<v Speaker 1>So that would be Thanksgiving team to likable Thanksgiving. Well,

0:57:04.360 --> 0:57:06.600
<v Speaker 1>they're on the road though on Thanksgiving. If that matters

0:57:06.600 --> 0:57:08.399
<v Speaker 1>to anybody these days, which I'm not sure how much

0:57:08.400 --> 0:57:10.560
<v Speaker 1>it does, but it would be a short week of

0:57:10.600 --> 0:57:17.520
<v Speaker 1>travel anyway to Dallas on Thursday. Okay, next, sir, the

0:57:17.720 --> 0:57:22.040
<v Speaker 1>Raiders at the Chargers. Raiders at the Chargers. So a

0:57:22.120 --> 0:57:24.880
<v Speaker 1>lot went well for me yesterday. In fact, almost everything

0:57:24.920 --> 0:57:28.960
<v Speaker 1>went well for me yesterday betting football except for teaser,

0:57:29.080 --> 0:57:31.840
<v Speaker 1>a teaser with Tennessee in them, and as I mentioned,

0:57:31.840 --> 0:57:36.640
<v Speaker 1>the one contest pick of New Orleans. Everything else teasers galore. Um.

0:57:36.640 --> 0:57:39.320
<v Speaker 1>Tying into Tampa, not not only tying into Tampa but

0:57:39.360 --> 0:57:44.760
<v Speaker 1>also without Tampa went well. Um in game. The only

0:57:44.800 --> 0:57:46.320
<v Speaker 1>thing I did in game now here was the thing.

0:57:46.360 --> 0:57:49.160
<v Speaker 1>This was weather yesterday throughout the country, and one of

0:57:49.160 --> 0:57:52.200
<v Speaker 1>the things I said on the pre snap Picks podcast

0:57:52.280 --> 0:57:55.800
<v Speaker 1>Bradley Porus and Russell Vaughan and Randy Gritchick of the

0:57:55.960 --> 0:57:59.000
<v Speaker 1>Toronto Blue Jays, we were talking about the weather and

0:57:59.320 --> 0:58:01.520
<v Speaker 1>there was a lot of people who set up middles

0:58:01.560 --> 0:58:04.240
<v Speaker 1>for weather last week where they went under early in

0:58:04.240 --> 0:58:05.800
<v Speaker 1>the week and then they took back the over and

0:58:05.800 --> 0:58:09.080
<v Speaker 1>they set up these big middles on totals, which is

0:58:09.080 --> 0:58:12.760
<v Speaker 1>a great strategy. My approach was, you know what, I'm

0:58:12.760 --> 0:58:15.240
<v Speaker 1>not going to try to do that because I probably

0:58:15.280 --> 0:58:17.160
<v Speaker 1>missed the best number at that point. So I was like,

0:58:17.200 --> 0:58:19.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm not gonna do that. I'm gonna wait. Of all

0:58:19.400 --> 0:58:22.480
<v Speaker 1>these cities that we're gonna supposed to have in clement weather,

0:58:22.560 --> 0:58:26.760
<v Speaker 1>between Green Bay, Cleveland, Buffalo, Cincinnati, and Chicago, I was

0:58:26.760 --> 0:58:29.200
<v Speaker 1>gonna actually sit down and watch the games and figure

0:58:29.240 --> 0:58:31.760
<v Speaker 1>out is there actually in clement weather that's gonna hamper

0:58:32.160 --> 0:58:34.680
<v Speaker 1>any of these football games. And the only game where

0:58:34.680 --> 0:58:36.840
<v Speaker 1>you could say, beyond a shadow of a doubt, oh

0:58:36.880 --> 0:58:39.240
<v Speaker 1>this is a thing was the game in Cleveland. As

0:58:39.280 --> 0:58:41.120
<v Speaker 1>soon as like the one of the first field goals

0:58:41.360 --> 0:58:43.560
<v Speaker 1>looked like it was going right down the pipe, and

0:58:43.600 --> 0:58:46.880
<v Speaker 1>then took a hard left into the stands. I was like,

0:58:46.920 --> 0:58:52.920
<v Speaker 1>oh okay, so I in game undered the Raiders Brown's

0:58:52.960 --> 0:58:56.160
<v Speaker 1>game yesterday at forty four, forty four and a half,

0:58:56.560 --> 0:58:59.200
<v Speaker 1>forty three and a half, forty one and a half,

0:58:59.560 --> 0:59:02.760
<v Speaker 1>thirty nine and a half and thirty seven plus one

0:59:02.760 --> 0:59:05.360
<v Speaker 1>oh six, and that's where I sort of let it go.

0:59:06.120 --> 0:59:09.200
<v Speaker 1>Final score sixteen to six. And that to me, if

0:59:09.200 --> 0:59:11.439
<v Speaker 1>there was ever an I do primetime action with Matt Brown,

0:59:11.520 --> 0:59:14.960
<v Speaker 1>Daniel Vary, and Kelly Bidlin Monday through Friday seven at

0:59:15.000 --> 0:59:17.720
<v Speaker 1>ten on MSG plus seven at ten PM. That's what

0:59:17.800 --> 0:59:20.560
<v Speaker 1>we always preached, like, this is the beauty of endgame, right,

0:59:20.600 --> 0:59:24.160
<v Speaker 1>And that was a perfect in game situation yesterday where

0:59:24.240 --> 0:59:26.600
<v Speaker 1>now they're not always gonna work out as beautifully, don't

0:59:26.600 --> 0:59:28.160
<v Speaker 1>get me wrong, but that was one of those where

0:59:28.160 --> 0:59:30.720
<v Speaker 1>you couldt least see on your screen, Oh man, this

0:59:30.800 --> 0:59:34.320
<v Speaker 1>weather is terrible, and John Gruden looks like he wants

0:59:34.360 --> 0:59:36.720
<v Speaker 1>to get out of here in ninety minutes and just

0:59:36.840 --> 0:59:39.160
<v Speaker 1>run the ball all day long. And that's what he did.

0:59:39.160 --> 0:59:42.600
<v Speaker 1>So the Raiders beat the Browns yesterday sixteen to six

0:59:42.880 --> 0:59:46.480
<v Speaker 1>as three and a half point dogs. Uh. Josh Jacobs

0:59:46.640 --> 0:59:50.560
<v Speaker 1>thirty one carries, one eight yards two hundred and eight

0:59:50.600 --> 0:59:53.840
<v Speaker 1>total rushing yards for the Raiders on forty five carries.

0:59:54.040 --> 0:59:56.000
<v Speaker 1>They were eight of fourteen on third downs, they were

0:59:56.000 --> 0:59:58.360
<v Speaker 1>two of two on fourth. They held the Browns to

0:59:58.440 --> 1:00:02.320
<v Speaker 1>two twenty three total yards. They outpossessed Cleveland thirty seven

1:00:02.440 --> 1:00:06.240
<v Speaker 1>forty three to twenty to seventeen. A lot of big

1:00:06.560 --> 1:00:09.240
<v Speaker 1>disparities in time of possession yesterday, and time of possession

1:00:09.480 --> 1:00:13.080
<v Speaker 1>doesn't always mean something, but yesterday they tended to UH.

1:00:13.120 --> 1:00:14.920
<v Speaker 1>And then they're playing the Chargers. As you said, as

1:00:14.920 --> 1:00:18.080
<v Speaker 1>we talked about Chargers up twenty four to three, they've

1:00:18.120 --> 1:00:21.200
<v Speaker 1>now blown four leads of sixteen plus. It's just incredible.

1:00:21.200 --> 1:00:23.080
<v Speaker 1>We could show those tweets again if you wanted to.

1:00:23.280 --> 1:00:27.320
<v Speaker 1>Jason on the Chargers, just historic. Justin Herbert though twenty

1:00:27.400 --> 1:00:30.600
<v Speaker 1>nine forty three for two seventy eight, three touchdowns, two picks,

1:00:30.600 --> 1:00:34.160
<v Speaker 1>he was sacked twice. Williams five Mike Williams that is

1:00:34.160 --> 1:00:36.640
<v Speaker 1>five catches for ninety nine yards and a touchdown, four

1:00:36.720 --> 1:00:39.919
<v Speaker 1>hundred eighty five total yards for the Chargers in their

1:00:40.000 --> 1:00:43.200
<v Speaker 1>loss to the Broncos yesterday, their thirty one to thirty loss.

1:00:43.560 --> 1:00:46.680
<v Speaker 1>And again here it is Daniel Popper. Chargers blown leads

1:00:46.720 --> 1:00:50.520
<v Speaker 1>in the last four games seventeen points, seventeen points, sixteen points,

1:00:50.560 --> 1:00:52.640
<v Speaker 1>and twenty one points. If you just put up the

1:00:52.640 --> 1:00:54.360
<v Speaker 1>first one for MDESPN stats in Info. You don't have

1:00:54.400 --> 1:00:55.560
<v Speaker 1>to put up both of them, Jason, but just the

1:00:55.600 --> 1:00:57.920
<v Speaker 1>first one really puts it in context again, because this

1:00:57.960 --> 1:01:01.280
<v Speaker 1>is incredible, like it's happening. Were our eyes week after week.

1:01:01.440 --> 1:01:04.640
<v Speaker 1>My entire handicap on the Broncos last week was I

1:01:04.680 --> 1:01:07.439
<v Speaker 1>can't tell you why I'm picking the Broncos, but the

1:01:07.560 --> 1:01:09.360
<v Speaker 1>Charges will just figure out a way to lose this

1:01:09.480 --> 1:01:11.360
<v Speaker 1>Like that was the extent of my handicap. Here. It

1:01:11.400 --> 1:01:13.600
<v Speaker 1>is from ESPN Stats and Info. Teams when leading by

1:01:13.600 --> 1:01:17.680
<v Speaker 1>seventeen plus this season entering last night's game, Chargers oh

1:01:17.800 --> 1:01:21.920
<v Speaker 1>and three, all others fifty two and four. But they

1:01:21.960 --> 1:01:24.240
<v Speaker 1>gave up plays of fifty five yards. That was the

1:01:24.280 --> 1:01:27.960
<v Speaker 1>Lindsay touchdown that made it to ten, then another play

1:01:28.000 --> 1:01:30.919
<v Speaker 1>of forty three yard to Judy. There's a touchdown pass

1:01:30.960 --> 1:01:32.640
<v Speaker 1>for forty yards and they're given up a huge place

1:01:32.680 --> 1:01:36.520
<v Speaker 1>on defense, complimented by a couple of dumb penalties. There

1:01:36.560 --> 1:01:39.480
<v Speaker 1>are your Los Angeles Chargers and all that said, I

1:01:39.520 --> 1:01:41.840
<v Speaker 1>would imagine there'll be a field goal favorite against the

1:01:41.880 --> 1:01:46.560
<v Speaker 1>Raiders at home. Oh you're high, it's one and a half.

1:01:46.680 --> 1:01:49.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean you had pretty much painted on Yeah, my

1:01:49.440 --> 1:01:52.160
<v Speaker 1>number's gonna pick and I had I was reviewing some

1:01:52.320 --> 1:01:56.320
<v Speaker 1>notes next to the Chargers I put down for Anthony

1:01:56.440 --> 1:02:04.840
<v Speaker 1>Lynn approaching rich code type territory. Not we NFL historians

1:02:04.840 --> 1:02:07.960
<v Speaker 1>out there. That's not good. You know, it's funny. Can

1:02:08.000 --> 1:02:10.000
<v Speaker 1>I just interrupt? It's funny you say that because we

1:02:10.040 --> 1:02:14.280
<v Speaker 1>had a debate on text yesterday about this, and somebody

1:02:14.320 --> 1:02:16.400
<v Speaker 1>on the thread said, Anthony Lynn's the worst coach in

1:02:16.400 --> 1:02:17.920
<v Speaker 1>the history of the NFL, and we all and the

1:02:17.960 --> 1:02:21.760
<v Speaker 1>rest of us were like, whoa easy, easy and rich coach?

1:02:22.120 --> 1:02:25.800
<v Speaker 1>Rich co tite was invoked, and I invoked Steve Spurrier

1:02:26.360 --> 1:02:28.360
<v Speaker 1>as a head coach in the NFL. And for those

1:02:28.400 --> 1:02:30.600
<v Speaker 1>who don't remember the two years of Steve Spurrier at

1:02:30.600 --> 1:02:33.000
<v Speaker 1>the helm of the Washington football team, that was the

1:02:33.040 --> 1:02:37.360
<v Speaker 1>analogy I uses. It's like he kidnapped your wife or girlfriend,

1:02:37.360 --> 1:02:40.480
<v Speaker 1>experimented on her for two years, you were left to

1:02:40.560 --> 1:02:43.080
<v Speaker 1>watch it, and then he returned her to you damaged.

1:02:43.680 --> 1:02:47.640
<v Speaker 1>That's how bad those two years were so easy. He's

1:02:47.680 --> 1:02:52.440
<v Speaker 1>not the worst, but he's getting there. Yeah, coming close.

1:02:52.560 --> 1:02:58.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah yet, but he's getting damn close. I gotta tell

1:02:58.560 --> 1:03:01.760
<v Speaker 1>you so. One and a half is what it is.

1:03:02.960 --> 1:03:06.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna all right, let's go to the afternoon. We

1:03:06.480 --> 1:03:08.520
<v Speaker 1>were in the afternoon. Now, is that already the first afternoon?

1:03:10.720 --> 1:03:14.800
<v Speaker 1>That was the first afternoon? Okay, okay, this one no

1:03:15.000 --> 1:03:20.560
<v Speaker 1>number at all. Steelers at the Cowboys. Steelers at the Cowboys,

1:03:21.280 --> 1:03:26.280
<v Speaker 1>Steelers win, as we mentioned, beat Baltimore four. That match

1:03:26.360 --> 1:03:28.760
<v Speaker 1>is the greatest start. And you know this better than anybody.

1:03:28.800 --> 1:03:31.440
<v Speaker 1>Chrissie has a guy who uh it's a Pittsburgh Steeler fan,

1:03:31.560 --> 1:03:34.480
<v Speaker 1>matches the greatest start in franchise history. Who does it match?

1:03:34.600 --> 1:03:38.400
<v Speaker 1>The nineteen seventy eight Steelers? Is that the most iconic

1:03:38.440 --> 1:03:43.000
<v Speaker 1>of all the Steelers teams? Would you say? I think

1:03:43.080 --> 1:03:46.280
<v Speaker 1>it probably is? Yes, Yeah, probably their best team they

1:03:46.360 --> 1:03:49.080
<v Speaker 1>ever had. Yeah, Big Ben yesterday on eventual Super Bowl

1:03:49.080 --> 1:03:51.840
<v Speaker 1>winning team, of course, Big Bend thirty two for one,

1:03:52.200 --> 1:03:56.080
<v Speaker 1>two two touchdowns, no picks, sack twice. Steelers d had

1:03:56.120 --> 1:04:00.200
<v Speaker 1>four sacks, four takeaways. It's the most rushing you rds.

1:04:00.200 --> 1:04:02.480
<v Speaker 1>The Steelers defense has given up two hundred sixty five

1:04:02.520 --> 1:04:06.520
<v Speaker 1>to the Ravens since the game in nineteen three. And yet,

1:04:06.520 --> 1:04:08.320
<v Speaker 1>as we mentioned, it was the pick six and a

1:04:08.400 --> 1:04:11.560
<v Speaker 1>subsequent pick in the third quarter that that allowed the

1:04:11.600 --> 1:04:14.360
<v Speaker 1>Steelers set up a short field, allowed the Steelers to

1:04:14.400 --> 1:04:17.040
<v Speaker 1>get it within seventeen fourteen. That was really the boost

1:04:17.120 --> 1:04:20.600
<v Speaker 1>that the Steelers offense needed. They finally woke up after that,

1:04:21.200 --> 1:04:23.520
<v Speaker 1>and Steelers end up getting the win. As you said,

1:04:23.520 --> 1:04:24.920
<v Speaker 1>the Ravens had a chance to win it at the

1:04:25.000 --> 1:04:27.720
<v Speaker 1>end still, but the Steelers get it done. And then

1:04:27.760 --> 1:04:35.640
<v Speaker 1>there's Dallas last night. So I'll take a breath, Ben Denucci,

1:04:36.760 --> 1:04:39.560
<v Speaker 1>Vinny Maliulo. As we said on Friday, Ben d Nucci,

1:04:40.400 --> 1:04:42.640
<v Speaker 1>this looks better. This looks better in the box score

1:04:42.640 --> 1:04:45.560
<v Speaker 1>than it was. Twenty one of forty for one eighty,

1:04:45.640 --> 1:04:48.280
<v Speaker 1>no touchdowns, no picks, he was sacked four times. But

1:04:48.360 --> 1:04:50.280
<v Speaker 1>I think there's I think, and I don't mean to

1:04:50.320 --> 1:04:53.640
<v Speaker 1>be harsh, because I'm sure he's a lovely guy and

1:04:53.640 --> 1:04:55.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure his family is wonderful, so I don't want

1:04:55.440 --> 1:04:58.480
<v Speaker 1>to be that guy. But I'm not sure after seeing

1:04:58.520 --> 1:05:00.560
<v Speaker 1>that game against the Eagles last night, Chrissy that he

1:05:00.640 --> 1:05:06.000
<v Speaker 1>belongs in the NFL I'm really not No. And you know,

1:05:06.200 --> 1:05:10.080
<v Speaker 1>I was listening in a wretch Ryan and the ESPN show.

1:05:10.280 --> 1:05:13.320
<v Speaker 1>I guess it was Sunday morning. They said, well, you know,

1:05:13.360 --> 1:05:16.040
<v Speaker 1>he transferred from Pitt And Ryan said, well, why did

1:05:16.080 --> 1:05:19.640
<v Speaker 1>he transferred from Pitt? Because he wasn't good enough to start? Yeah, so,

1:05:19.800 --> 1:05:22.080
<v Speaker 1>I you know, I mean he couldn't. You know, I

1:05:22.160 --> 1:05:25.360
<v Speaker 1>can't remember what pit quarterback, you know, Nathan Peterman or

1:05:25.560 --> 1:05:28.480
<v Speaker 1>it was guys. I think it was Post Peterman, you know,

1:05:28.920 --> 1:05:33.480
<v Speaker 1>but it's not exactly the Dan Marino you're Pitt right now.

1:05:33.560 --> 1:05:35.720
<v Speaker 1>So transferring, I don't think it's such a great thing,

1:05:36.040 --> 1:05:40.240
<v Speaker 1>but yeah, you're right, I mean listen, um, yeah, I

1:05:40.280 --> 1:05:42.080
<v Speaker 1>don't think he belongs to me. A lot of us,

1:05:42.160 --> 1:05:45.520
<v Speaker 1>don't you know. And I would put him in that category. Um,

1:05:45.600 --> 1:05:47.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, I gotta tell you. So, I mean, we

1:05:47.120 --> 1:05:49.400
<v Speaker 1>still want to come up with a number. Here we

1:05:50.000 --> 1:05:51.680
<v Speaker 1>get there. Let me let me just say a couple

1:05:51.760 --> 1:05:53.720
<v Speaker 1>more things about that game, because this will be an

1:05:53.720 --> 1:05:57.760
<v Speaker 1>interesting this will be this will be an interesting do Um.

1:05:57.880 --> 1:05:59.520
<v Speaker 1>First of all, there's none out there, by the way,

1:05:59.680 --> 1:06:04.560
<v Speaker 1>don't Dallas out gained Philadelphia. So all that said about Denucci,

1:06:05.040 --> 1:06:09.640
<v Speaker 1>Dallas outgained Philadelphia yesterday to six to twenty two, and

1:06:09.760 --> 1:06:12.800
<v Speaker 1>Dallas was plus two in turnovers. Philly turned the ball

1:06:12.840 --> 1:06:17.000
<v Speaker 1>over four times as bad as Ben Denucci was, and

1:06:17.040 --> 1:06:19.400
<v Speaker 1>again a guy who transferred from pit to James Madison

1:06:20.160 --> 1:06:23.040
<v Speaker 1>as bad as he was. That game, to me was

1:06:23.160 --> 1:06:26.400
<v Speaker 1>more an indictment of the Philadelphia Eagles, who now lead

1:06:26.480 --> 1:06:29.040
<v Speaker 1>the NFC East at three four and one, than it

1:06:29.120 --> 1:06:30.920
<v Speaker 1>was of the Dallas Cowboys, who are down to their

1:06:30.920 --> 1:06:34.040
<v Speaker 1>third string quarterback. I was we were even as Philly

1:06:34.080 --> 1:06:35.960
<v Speaker 1>was winning that game. I show, like, how many teams

1:06:35.960 --> 1:06:38.800
<v Speaker 1>can you say definitively or worse than the Philadelphia Eagles.

1:06:39.120 --> 1:06:43.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure the Jets for sure, And then who

1:06:43.040 --> 1:06:46.640
<v Speaker 1>else is like surely worse because even the Jags put

1:06:46.640 --> 1:06:50.400
<v Speaker 1>out great efforts. I don't think Washington's worse. I don't

1:06:50.440 --> 1:06:52.520
<v Speaker 1>know if the Giants are worse. They almost beat the Eagles.

1:06:52.560 --> 1:06:54.800
<v Speaker 1>They should have beaten the Eagles the other night. Like,

1:06:54.960 --> 1:06:58.320
<v Speaker 1>I don't know who's worse than this team. They're so

1:06:58.560 --> 1:07:01.280
<v Speaker 1>bad and and let just say this also, the final

1:07:01.320 --> 1:07:04.280
<v Speaker 1>score was twenty three to nine. The Eagles end up

1:07:04.360 --> 1:07:10.520
<v Speaker 1>covering that game. That last Eagles touchdown was the worst

1:07:10.920 --> 1:07:15.360
<v Speaker 1>non reversal of a touchdown I've ever seen in my life, Like,

1:07:15.480 --> 1:07:19.080
<v Speaker 1>why do we have replay if that wasn't reversed. A

1:07:19.240 --> 1:07:22.520
<v Speaker 1>fumble by Denucci where the defender on the Eagles is

1:07:22.520 --> 1:07:25.320
<v Speaker 1>clearly on the ground and touched and they let the

1:07:25.320 --> 1:07:27.080
<v Speaker 1>play go. And by the way, we're all waiting, right,

1:07:27.080 --> 1:07:28.680
<v Speaker 1>we're all watching the game. We're like, Wow, this is

1:07:28.680 --> 1:07:31.200
<v Speaker 1>gonna be taken back. You know clearly it's gonna be No,

1:07:31.240 --> 1:07:33.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm not saying that Dallas were one, but it was

1:07:33.520 --> 1:07:36.640
<v Speaker 1>fifteen to nine at the time, and you never know

1:07:36.680 --> 1:07:38.480
<v Speaker 1>what could have happened because all takes is one flute

1:07:38.480 --> 1:07:40.320
<v Speaker 1>play in a one score game. But Philly should have

1:07:40.360 --> 1:07:42.720
<v Speaker 1>had the ball up fifteen to nine, back in their territory.

1:07:42.800 --> 1:07:44.600
<v Speaker 1>And then as we're like talking about, all of a sudden,

1:07:44.640 --> 1:07:46.880
<v Speaker 1>you see Jalen Hurts lining up for two point conversially, wait,

1:07:46.920 --> 1:07:51.160
<v Speaker 1>what's happening? They counted it? What are we doing like

1:07:51.200 --> 1:07:55.400
<v Speaker 1>this league? Between that, the Bears fumble that was ruled

1:07:55.600 --> 1:08:01.640
<v Speaker 1>forward progress Russell Wilson, you know, fake sliding and inducing

1:08:01.640 --> 1:08:04.680
<v Speaker 1>a flag. There's so many things that happened in the

1:08:04.800 --> 1:08:07.200
<v Speaker 1>NFL on a week to week basis. We just scratch

1:08:07.240 --> 1:08:09.560
<v Speaker 1>your head and you're like, what are we watching? And

1:08:09.600 --> 1:08:11.840
<v Speaker 1>that Eagles thing, there was no bigger example of it

1:08:11.880 --> 1:08:15.360
<v Speaker 1>than that. Anyway, all that to say, I would say

1:08:15.400 --> 1:08:17.559
<v Speaker 1>Pittsburgh would be a double digit favorite on the road,

1:08:17.680 --> 1:08:22.320
<v Speaker 1>and I would think it would be ten and a half. Well,

1:08:22.360 --> 1:08:24.320
<v Speaker 1>there's no number, so I can't say I like your

1:08:24.400 --> 1:08:27.479
<v Speaker 1>number better or worse, whatever, But my numbers come to

1:08:27.560 --> 1:08:33.360
<v Speaker 1>fourteen on this one. And uh but and you could

1:08:33.360 --> 1:08:36.360
<v Speaker 1>ask your buddy Marco, who I'm sure you're doing. You

1:08:36.479 --> 1:08:42.080
<v Speaker 1>come to the podcast and in no, no, no, not anymore, no, no, okay, okay, yeah, okay,

1:08:42.360 --> 1:08:45.600
<v Speaker 1>he would tell you nobody could blow a game that

1:08:45.640 --> 1:08:49.840
<v Speaker 1>they're supposed to win like the Pittsburgh Yeah. I love

1:08:49.960 --> 1:08:52.280
<v Speaker 1>this game, I really do. I think they're playing great.

1:08:52.520 --> 1:08:54.639
<v Speaker 1>But if there's one team out there that could blow

1:08:54.680 --> 1:08:58.760
<v Speaker 1>an easy situations, who is? But I you know, my

1:08:58.880 --> 1:09:01.479
<v Speaker 1>numbers come to four team and you know that's that's

1:09:02.320 --> 1:09:05.280
<v Speaker 1>again you're talking about diminishing returns. That's too high of

1:09:05.320 --> 1:09:08.120
<v Speaker 1>the number. I would be the first who admit that,

1:09:08.400 --> 1:09:10.559
<v Speaker 1>But that's the pure power rating number for me would

1:09:10.600 --> 1:09:13.479
<v Speaker 1>be fourteen, but it has to be lower probably, you know,

1:09:14.439 --> 1:09:16.600
<v Speaker 1>and and a half toiled somewhere in that range, and

1:09:16.960 --> 1:09:19.240
<v Speaker 1>again depends on if Andy Dalton is back. I have

1:09:19.280 --> 1:09:21.639
<v Speaker 1>a feeling Dolt will be back. Yeah, that's a that's

1:09:21.640 --> 1:09:26.000
<v Speaker 1>a huge yeah. Yeah, all right, because you're talking, you know,

1:09:27.360 --> 1:09:29.840
<v Speaker 1>maybe his mediocre as Dalton is, and I still think

1:09:29.840 --> 1:09:33.640
<v Speaker 1>he's not that bad. Denuci probably should not be in

1:09:33.640 --> 1:09:35.679
<v Speaker 1>this league. All right, not at all. We'll come back.

1:09:35.800 --> 1:09:37.719
<v Speaker 1>We've gotta take a break. We'll come back. Christie Andrew's

1:09:37.720 --> 1:09:40.080
<v Speaker 1>guessing lines right here on a numbers game of Visa

1:09:40.120 --> 1:09:42.759
<v Speaker 1>the Sports Betting Network, brought you by bet mg M Nevada.

1:09:44.160 --> 1:09:47.879
<v Speaker 1>We had tweets at beating the book. We always appreciate

1:09:47.920 --> 1:09:54.960
<v Speaker 1>the feedback, positive, negative, indifferent. Funny. We're big fans of funny. Okay,

1:09:55.000 --> 1:09:56.720
<v Speaker 1>so what's upset? What's upsetting? Why's the mouth of WI

1:09:56.760 --> 1:09:59.559
<v Speaker 1>don't what's going on? We had a graphic. It's beautiful.

1:09:59.560 --> 1:10:02.320
<v Speaker 1>There's not a set. Were you amazed at the grabbing?

1:10:02.400 --> 1:10:07.080
<v Speaker 1>We haven't blown away? Weekend tweets graphic Trip Tepper McCaffrey

1:10:07.080 --> 1:10:09.120
<v Speaker 1>being back for the Panthers would be significant. He was

1:10:09.320 --> 1:10:11.920
<v Speaker 1>if he was a lockdown corner. He is not. Thank

1:10:11.920 --> 1:10:14.200
<v Speaker 1>you for that trip. The back end of the Panthers

1:10:14.240 --> 1:10:17.320
<v Speaker 1>defense is struggling to cover unless the Chiefs play sloppy

1:10:17.439 --> 1:10:19.679
<v Speaker 1>or there are forty mile per hour wins. The wide

1:10:19.680 --> 1:10:23.439
<v Speaker 1>receivers are casey should have a field a forty not thirty.

1:10:24.479 --> 1:10:28.519
<v Speaker 1>Forty point taken though, sir, point taken indeed, uh fabulous,

1:10:28.560 --> 1:10:31.439
<v Speaker 1>t Rex Sunshine Jones stops being a political when the

1:10:31.479 --> 1:10:36.440
<v Speaker 1>expert slash, guests, etcetera start editorializing or explaining their rationale

1:10:36.439 --> 1:10:38.760
<v Speaker 1>for predicted outcomes. That said, it's not criticism, just an

1:10:38.760 --> 1:10:41.320
<v Speaker 1>opinion that one cannot really discuss any aspect of politics

1:10:41.560 --> 1:10:45.400
<v Speaker 1>truly a politically I am going to a politically disagree.

1:10:45.760 --> 1:10:49.479
<v Speaker 1>I think they did a fabulous job of explaining, just

1:10:49.600 --> 1:10:54.120
<v Speaker 1>from a demographic standpoint, why uh they felt the way

1:10:54.200 --> 1:10:57.080
<v Speaker 1>they felt at a certain level. It's just numbers, right, Yeah,

1:10:58.040 --> 1:11:00.800
<v Speaker 1>it's funny, it's amazing. It doesn't matter how agnostics. So

1:11:01.040 --> 1:11:02.680
<v Speaker 1>you're just gonna some people gonna take it in as

1:11:02.880 --> 1:11:06.920
<v Speaker 1>a little by the way, he was Republican operative who

1:11:06.920 --> 1:11:09.559
<v Speaker 1>worked in Republican politics for many years. Mac was people

1:11:09.600 --> 1:11:12.840
<v Speaker 1>like the liberal No no, no, he wasn't just explain

1:11:12.920 --> 1:11:15.560
<v Speaker 1>to you what he what he thought, very very dispassionately,

1:11:15.720 --> 1:11:19.800
<v Speaker 1>though um Mark am never forget rich code Tight was

1:11:19.920 --> 1:11:22.680
<v Speaker 1>lauded as a returning hero when the Jets hired him.

1:11:23.040 --> 1:11:26.920
<v Speaker 1>Eagles fans were characterized as fools who one fairly ran

1:11:27.080 --> 1:11:32.639
<v Speaker 1>him off. Hashtag declined the penalty and punt hashtag the

1:11:32.720 --> 1:11:36.639
<v Speaker 1>chart was wet It's great Rich code Tight references from

1:11:36.640 --> 1:11:39.840
<v Speaker 1>Back of the Day Scott Murphy. Since Chrissy is from Pennsylvania,

1:11:39.880 --> 1:11:42.280
<v Speaker 1>see if you can work rust belt into the next segment,

1:11:42.320 --> 1:11:44.479
<v Speaker 1>either election or Steeler related. Okay, we'll work on that.

1:11:45.400 --> 1:11:48.720
<v Speaker 1>Um let's see here, man bear Puig. I'm ron burgending

1:11:48.800 --> 1:11:50.800
<v Speaker 1>my way through these, so this could get ugly. Jason

1:11:50.880 --> 1:11:55.160
<v Speaker 1>Standby speaking of the Wilson fake slide. Yes, I was earlier.

1:11:55.520 --> 1:12:00.120
<v Speaker 1>The Mahomes fake run quarterback against Buffalo was bad. Defenders

1:12:00.200 --> 1:12:02.200
<v Speaker 1>ease up, then he stays in bounds. This can't be

1:12:02.240 --> 1:12:04.960
<v Speaker 1>a one size fits all rule. Can't expect defenders to

1:12:05.000 --> 1:12:07.559
<v Speaker 1>treat Jackson and Murray the same as Rivers and Breeze. Yeah,

1:12:07.600 --> 1:12:10.080
<v Speaker 1>that that's gonna be a hard one to to get

1:12:10.120 --> 1:12:13.920
<v Speaker 1>around that one. But because I don't know, if I

1:12:13.960 --> 1:12:15.920
<v Speaker 1>don't know if it's a I mean, you're right, there

1:12:16.000 --> 1:12:17.720
<v Speaker 1>is a bit of a star system thing happening, but

1:12:17.800 --> 1:12:23.400
<v Speaker 1>that's generally officiated the same. But I hear you. I

1:12:23.439 --> 1:12:25.920
<v Speaker 1>mean there's definitely players who get I mean, I would

1:12:26.200 --> 1:12:29.200
<v Speaker 1>I said that about the Saints earlier with that you

1:12:29.200 --> 1:12:30.960
<v Speaker 1>know that fumble that the Bears by the way, how

1:12:31.000 --> 1:12:34.519
<v Speaker 1>many late drive good fortune moments have the Bears had

1:12:34.560 --> 1:12:38.599
<v Speaker 1>this year? They're five and three, and again paper Tiger.

1:12:38.640 --> 1:12:40.639
<v Speaker 1>I don't think anybody expects them to win the Super Bowl.

1:12:41.000 --> 1:12:43.640
<v Speaker 1>But that game against Tampa Bay were they you know,

1:12:43.720 --> 1:12:48.240
<v Speaker 1>Tampa Bay gifted them the the roughing the passer and

1:12:48.280 --> 1:12:51.679
<v Speaker 1>then the ball that was completely uncatchable that they flagged

1:12:51.720 --> 1:12:54.000
<v Speaker 1>Tampa Bay for p I. They end up winning the

1:12:54.000 --> 1:12:57.320
<v Speaker 1>game twenty to nineteen. And then Yesterday's like that that

1:12:57.400 --> 1:13:00.000
<v Speaker 1>was okay, maybe it was for progress, but like why

1:13:00.080 --> 1:13:01.840
<v Speaker 1>did the refs field the need to step in? And

1:13:01.880 --> 1:13:04.120
<v Speaker 1>that's where like fans of teams like Washington would say,

1:13:04.120 --> 1:13:06.840
<v Speaker 1>like myself would be like, oh yeah, that never, that

1:13:06.920 --> 1:13:09.599
<v Speaker 1>would never happen to the Washington football team. We would

1:13:09.680 --> 1:13:11.800
<v Speaker 1>never get the benefit or we but that team would

1:13:11.800 --> 1:13:15.519
<v Speaker 1>never get the benefit of such a call. Uh. Let's see,

1:13:16.400 --> 1:13:19.680
<v Speaker 1>this is Phil Weiss, Phil Weiss, Steve Spurri or two

1:13:19.760 --> 1:13:22.200
<v Speaker 1>years of Washington twelve and twenty rich co tight two

1:13:22.280 --> 1:13:25.720
<v Speaker 1>years of the Jets four and twenty eight. Rod Marinelli

1:13:25.800 --> 1:13:28.400
<v Speaker 1>deserves an honorable mention in this category. I mean he

1:13:28.439 --> 1:13:30.960
<v Speaker 1>did go oh in sixteen for the Lion. Uh. Phil

1:13:31.040 --> 1:13:33.000
<v Speaker 1>goes on to say Steve Spurrier College Football Hall of

1:13:33.040 --> 1:13:35.080
<v Speaker 1>Fame as player as coach. I don't care about that.

1:13:35.439 --> 1:13:37.640
<v Speaker 1>Rich co type born in Brooklyn, still can't show his

1:13:37.680 --> 1:13:39.840
<v Speaker 1>face in New York. Really, Gil, please don't insult Jets

1:13:39.920 --> 1:13:42.920
<v Speaker 1>fans like that. Apparently you don't remember the two Spurier

1:13:43.040 --> 1:13:47.400
<v Speaker 1>years five and eleven, five and eleven and sixteen beats

1:13:47.400 --> 1:13:50.360
<v Speaker 1>five and eleven. Not too bad. See there's another team

1:13:50.360 --> 1:13:55.719
<v Speaker 1>out there, there's four and twelve, so yeah, not too bad. Please.

1:13:56.240 --> 1:13:58.759
<v Speaker 1>I cannot argue this point. There was no one worse.

1:13:58.880 --> 1:14:00.760
<v Speaker 1>But you're right about the record. We'll come back. We'll

1:14:00.760 --> 1:14:02.960
<v Speaker 1>continue guessing lines with Chrissy. Next numbers game at Visa

1:14:03.000 --> 1:14:14.400
<v Speaker 1>the Sports Betty netwhere the Dolphins at the Cardinals. Okay,

1:14:14.479 --> 1:14:16.160
<v Speaker 1>so I've been waiting to get to this box score

1:14:16.360 --> 1:14:20.800
<v Speaker 1>because because the the Steelers Ravens box score was weird enough,

1:14:21.400 --> 1:14:25.240
<v Speaker 1>but this Dolphins rams box score was is the nuttiest

1:14:25.240 --> 1:14:27.280
<v Speaker 1>thing you're likely to see and by the way, of course,

1:14:27.280 --> 1:14:31.800
<v Speaker 1>if you missed it. Miami wins in Tua's debut to seventeen.

1:14:31.800 --> 1:14:33.639
<v Speaker 1>They do so as three and a half point dogs

1:14:34.360 --> 1:14:37.120
<v Speaker 1>my only three pre flop bets this year. Again Miami

1:14:37.200 --> 1:14:39.960
<v Speaker 1>over season win total six, New England under nine and

1:14:39.960 --> 1:14:42.679
<v Speaker 1>a half Miami to win the division at at plus

1:14:42.720 --> 1:14:45.479
<v Speaker 1>eleven fifty all of those in play, the first two

1:14:45.520 --> 1:14:48.040
<v Speaker 1>looking great, the second one kind of in playsh but

1:14:48.240 --> 1:14:51.160
<v Speaker 1>in this in this game, even even despite Miami winning

1:14:51.240 --> 1:14:54.880
<v Speaker 1>yesterday to a t A Taco Valoa in his debut

1:14:54.960 --> 1:14:58.960
<v Speaker 1>twelve of twenty two for ninety three yards ninety three yards,

1:14:58.960 --> 1:15:02.400
<v Speaker 1>one touchdown note picks we sacked ones. Uh. The Rams

1:15:02.439 --> 1:15:08.320
<v Speaker 1>had thirty one first downs, the Dolphins had eight. The

1:15:08.360 --> 1:15:11.920
<v Speaker 1>Dolphins were three of twelve on third downs. The Rams

1:15:11.960 --> 1:15:15.879
<v Speaker 1>had four hundred and seventy one total yards, the Dolphins

1:15:15.920 --> 1:15:19.759
<v Speaker 1>had one hundred forty five. The Rams had three hundred

1:15:19.800 --> 1:15:23.120
<v Speaker 1>forty two three hundred forty passing the Dolphins had ninety

1:15:23.160 --> 1:15:25.960
<v Speaker 1>passing when you factor in sacks. The Rams had a

1:15:26.040 --> 1:15:28.840
<v Speaker 1>hundred thirty one rushing yards, the Dolphins had fifty five.

1:15:29.680 --> 1:15:33.720
<v Speaker 1>The Rams ran ninety two offensive plays. The Dolphins ran.

1:15:35.160 --> 1:15:37.479
<v Speaker 1>The Rams had the ball thirty six twenty nine to

1:15:37.520 --> 1:15:40.840
<v Speaker 1>the Dolphins twenty three minutes and thirty one seconds. The

1:15:40.920 --> 1:15:43.839
<v Speaker 1>Dolphins were minus excuse me. The Dolphins, though, were plus

1:15:43.880 --> 1:15:47.320
<v Speaker 1>two in turnovers. That's always a huge key. And Miami

1:15:47.439 --> 1:15:51.080
<v Speaker 1>scores were as follows. Two short fields on an interception

1:15:51.240 --> 1:15:55.160
<v Speaker 1>Christian Wilkins uh and a fumble Kyle van Noy thirty

1:15:55.200 --> 1:15:58.360
<v Speaker 1>three yard field in a one yard field and then

1:15:58.400 --> 1:16:01.240
<v Speaker 1>one strip sack return for a touch down Emmanuel Logba

1:16:01.320 --> 1:16:03.840
<v Speaker 1>on the strip Andrew Van Ginkle to the house and

1:16:03.920 --> 1:16:06.799
<v Speaker 1>a punt return touchdowns Jachem Grant for Radi eight yards.

1:16:07.160 --> 1:16:10.479
<v Speaker 1>There is your script for Miami win yesterday, but one

1:16:10.520 --> 1:16:13.280
<v Speaker 1>of one of the craziest box scores you'll ever see

1:16:13.439 --> 1:16:16.760
<v Speaker 1>at Arizona. Arizona is coming off of by here. I'll say,

1:16:16.800 --> 1:16:22.640
<v Speaker 1>Arizona minus four and a half. Yeah, you're right on.

1:16:22.680 --> 1:16:25.160
<v Speaker 1>I do see one five, but otherwise four and a half.

1:16:25.360 --> 1:16:28.880
<v Speaker 1>You know, you know, I think that's a little high.

1:16:28.960 --> 1:16:31.240
<v Speaker 1>You know, I really do, right, You know, I'm I'm

1:16:31.280 --> 1:16:35.200
<v Speaker 1>not the biggest Murray fan, a lout a Kingsbury fan. Uh,

1:16:35.240 --> 1:16:38.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, the Dolphins. I know everything you say, obviously,

1:16:38.400 --> 1:16:40.680
<v Speaker 1>it was true when you're reading a box score, but

1:16:40.720 --> 1:16:43.519
<v Speaker 1>they didn't have to do anything else. That's right, And

1:16:44.520 --> 1:16:48.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think, you know, we talked about coaching,

1:16:48.120 --> 1:16:50.559
<v Speaker 1>and I really highly questioned the move to go to

1:16:50.560 --> 1:16:53.120
<v Speaker 1>to AH. They still question to move to go to

1:16:53.120 --> 1:16:56.840
<v Speaker 1>to AH, you know. But you know, Floors has done

1:16:56.840 --> 1:16:59.600
<v Speaker 1>a terrific job with this team. He really has. I

1:16:59.640 --> 1:17:03.120
<v Speaker 1>think you a really good coach, and I think the

1:17:03.880 --> 1:17:07.880
<v Speaker 1>sky is bright on the horizon for the Dolphins. I

1:17:07.880 --> 1:17:09.920
<v Speaker 1>think this is a take, you know, and I don't

1:17:09.920 --> 1:17:14.320
<v Speaker 1>think you know to you know, he looked very mediocre obviously,

1:17:14.360 --> 1:17:16.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, but that's all we had to do. And

1:17:16.360 --> 1:17:19.560
<v Speaker 1>I think it was a good first game for him.

1:17:19.640 --> 1:17:22.080
<v Speaker 1>You know, when we look back to win a game

1:17:22.160 --> 1:17:26.080
<v Speaker 1>like that where he hardly had to do anything, certainly

1:17:26.080 --> 1:17:30.240
<v Speaker 1>nothing dramatic, I think he'll learn from that and probably

1:17:30.240 --> 1:17:32.920
<v Speaker 1>get better. You know. I'd like to get lower. My

1:17:33.080 --> 1:17:36.880
<v Speaker 1>numbers really came to like three and a half here, Um,

1:17:37.280 --> 1:17:38.920
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about four and a half, and like I said,

1:17:39.000 --> 1:17:41.960
<v Speaker 1>even saw five. But I'm gonna go with the four

1:17:42.000 --> 1:17:44.840
<v Speaker 1>and a half. And if I see it going lower,

1:17:44.960 --> 1:17:47.080
<v Speaker 1>probably gonna drop. But I think my name is a

1:17:47.240 --> 1:17:50.960
<v Speaker 1>very live dog in this situation. All right, one one

1:17:51.080 --> 1:17:53.000
<v Speaker 1>head nod to the Dolphins on that. I like that

1:17:53.040 --> 1:17:56.160
<v Speaker 1>for all my future tickets. We have two prime times,

1:17:56.400 --> 1:17:58.280
<v Speaker 1>two prime time games to get to Sunday night and

1:17:58.280 --> 1:18:00.680
<v Speaker 1>Monday night. We'll do that next with Chrissy and we'll

1:18:00.720 --> 1:18:02.840
<v Speaker 1>tell you what we like in review coming back guessing

1:18:02.840 --> 1:18:04.240
<v Speaker 1>lines right here in a numbers game at Visa and

1:18:04.280 --> 1:18:07.560
<v Speaker 1>these sports betting network, Gail Alexander, it's Chris Andrews. Everybody,

1:18:07.840 --> 1:18:10.360
<v Speaker 1>the South Point Hotel casino, sports book director and of

1:18:10.360 --> 1:18:14.040
<v Speaker 1>course the author of Then One Day, Then One Day,

1:18:14.080 --> 1:18:17.439
<v Speaker 1>all the story times and more culled together for one

1:18:17.439 --> 1:18:20.040
<v Speaker 1>beautiful book available where all books are sold, including Amazon.

1:18:20.960 --> 1:18:26.680
<v Speaker 1>All right, Sunday night, Chrissy, Okay, another good one here,

1:18:26.760 --> 1:18:31.200
<v Speaker 1>Gil Saint at the Buck. It's a good week, good

1:18:31.320 --> 1:18:34.960
<v Speaker 1>matchups uh and good prime time too, although we'll see

1:18:34.960 --> 1:18:39.000
<v Speaker 1>about that Thursday night game now that a J. Dillon. Yeah,

1:18:39.640 --> 1:18:43.120
<v Speaker 1>Sunday night too, so oh like, oh, I think I

1:18:43.160 --> 1:18:46.439
<v Speaker 1>know it's coming. New Orleans at Tampa Bay, New Orleans.

1:18:46.479 --> 1:18:48.960
<v Speaker 1>As we mentioned, they win it on Will Lutz's thirty

1:18:49.000 --> 1:18:51.879
<v Speaker 1>five yard field goal with one minute and forty seconds

1:18:51.920 --> 1:18:55.519
<v Speaker 1>left in ot yesterday against the Bears. Drew Brees thirty

1:18:55.560 --> 1:18:58.160
<v Speaker 1>one of forty one for two eighty two touchdowns. Note

1:18:58.160 --> 1:19:02.839
<v Speaker 1>pics sacked once again. Can't really throw the ball down field.

1:19:03.520 --> 1:19:06.680
<v Speaker 1>Alvin Camaro though twelve sixty seven on the ground n

1:19:07.280 --> 1:19:10.000
<v Speaker 1>through the air. The Saints were two of thirteen on

1:19:10.080 --> 1:19:12.120
<v Speaker 1>third downs. They were two of three on fourth downs.

1:19:12.320 --> 1:19:14.920
<v Speaker 1>They get it done, they find a way, they don't cover,

1:19:15.439 --> 1:19:17.880
<v Speaker 1>but they do get the win twenty six to twenty three.

1:19:18.280 --> 1:19:21.280
<v Speaker 1>Tampa Bay plays tonight, so they're gonna be on short rest,

1:19:21.360 --> 1:19:24.759
<v Speaker 1>but they get the Giants, so could be a coaster

1:19:24.960 --> 1:19:27.240
<v Speaker 1>for the Bucks tonight. I'll say it's Tampa Bay by

1:19:27.240 --> 1:19:30.360
<v Speaker 1>more than a field goal. I think there's some residual

1:19:30.479 --> 1:19:33.760
<v Speaker 1>love for the Saints still, So I'm gonna guess that

1:19:33.840 --> 1:19:40.200
<v Speaker 1>it's four, and I may bet the Bucks well, we're

1:19:40.200 --> 1:19:42.719
<v Speaker 1>thinking the same. It's four and four and a half.

1:19:44.240 --> 1:19:46.880
<v Speaker 1>I absolutely like the four and a half better. I

1:19:46.880 --> 1:19:50.439
<v Speaker 1>think this number should be closer to six. Uh, the

1:19:50.640 --> 1:19:53.880
<v Speaker 1>Saints are just not that good. Yeah, you know you're

1:19:53.880 --> 1:19:56.439
<v Speaker 1>talking about some residual love. Yeah, I think you're right.

1:19:56.479 --> 1:19:59.960
<v Speaker 1>There's we're still looking at this team like they're serious

1:20:00.080 --> 1:20:03.240
<v Speaker 1>Super Bowl contenders as they were last year, the year before,

1:20:03.360 --> 1:20:06.679
<v Speaker 1>year before that, blah blah blah. But I don't think

1:20:06.680 --> 1:20:10.280
<v Speaker 1>they are this year. I just don't think they're that good. Uh.

1:20:10.320 --> 1:20:14.120
<v Speaker 1>You know, Breeze just can't get the ball downfield, and

1:20:14.160 --> 1:20:16.920
<v Speaker 1>they have some pieces that they've been missing him and

1:20:16.960 --> 1:20:18.680
<v Speaker 1>out through us the course of the year. Maybe they

1:20:18.720 --> 1:20:20.960
<v Speaker 1>get healthy. A lot of things gonna happen. I mean,

1:20:21.000 --> 1:20:24.080
<v Speaker 1>it's the NFL. Crazy things happen, But right now, I

1:20:24.160 --> 1:20:27.400
<v Speaker 1>do not think this team is in the level of

1:20:27.479 --> 1:20:30.000
<v Speaker 1>the Buccaneers, and I think the Bucks are getting better

1:20:30.000 --> 1:20:33.080
<v Speaker 1>and better every week. They might sleep walk through tonight's game.

1:20:33.200 --> 1:20:35.879
<v Speaker 1>I know that I kind of like them, even minus

1:20:35.920 --> 1:20:38.920
<v Speaker 1>the number. But you know, you always see crazy things

1:20:38.960 --> 1:20:41.200
<v Speaker 1>happen in the NFL. They can win by ten and

1:20:41.240 --> 1:20:43.400
<v Speaker 1>the Giants never have a chance to win the game,

1:20:43.760 --> 1:20:46.880
<v Speaker 1>and of course then they don't cover. But this I

1:20:46.920 --> 1:20:50.040
<v Speaker 1>think this is a game where they will be primes

1:20:50.080 --> 1:20:54.160
<v Speaker 1>for this game. And I think four is a number

1:20:54.160 --> 1:20:56.519
<v Speaker 1>you've gotta lay in the spot. You know, the Saints

1:20:56.560 --> 1:20:58.040
<v Speaker 1>just aren't that good, and I think the Bucks are

1:20:58.080 --> 1:21:01.080
<v Speaker 1>getting better and better every single week. I love people

1:21:01.080 --> 1:21:03.880
<v Speaker 1>should know we we do not talk about these games beforehand,

1:21:03.920 --> 1:21:06.920
<v Speaker 1>so we both had the same exact thing to say

1:21:06.920 --> 1:21:08.920
<v Speaker 1>about this game without ever having talked to each other,

1:21:09.000 --> 1:21:12.400
<v Speaker 1>which is, we think it's lower than it ought to be.

1:21:12.880 --> 1:21:14.600
<v Speaker 1>And this would be a bet on the on the

1:21:14.640 --> 1:21:18.640
<v Speaker 1>bucks from from our perspective Monday night. God help us,

1:21:18.720 --> 1:21:20.960
<v Speaker 1>because I know we've had too many good matchups. What

1:21:20.960 --> 1:21:23.479
<v Speaker 1>what I know the Jets haven't been used yet, so

1:21:23.520 --> 1:21:28.799
<v Speaker 1>it's probably a Jets game. Yeah, Patriots and the Jets

1:21:28.920 --> 1:21:31.800
<v Speaker 1>at Patriots at the Jet. Oh, this is kind of

1:21:31.840 --> 1:21:37.160
<v Speaker 1>interesting actually, so yeah, no, it's not a good game.

1:21:37.360 --> 1:21:39.760
<v Speaker 1>Patriots worst start since two thousand We can say this

1:21:39.840 --> 1:21:43.120
<v Speaker 1>every week now, first four game losing streaks since two

1:21:43.120 --> 1:21:45.599
<v Speaker 1>thousand two. Again, they lose to the Bills yesterday by

1:21:45.600 --> 1:21:48.519
<v Speaker 1>a field goal, had a chance to win it. Cam

1:21:48.600 --> 1:21:54.920
<v Speaker 1>fumbles Cam Newton yesterday for one seventy four, no touchdowns,

1:21:54.920 --> 1:21:56.920
<v Speaker 1>no picks, He was sacked twice. He was nine for

1:21:57.000 --> 1:21:59.040
<v Speaker 1>fifty four on the ground with a touchdown. But again,

1:21:59.120 --> 1:22:03.639
<v Speaker 1>is that fumble that's all people will remember. Damien Harris

1:22:03.640 --> 1:22:06.200
<v Speaker 1>sixteen for one oh two on the ground with a touchdown,

1:22:06.960 --> 1:22:09.720
<v Speaker 1>and the Jets yesterday and losing to the Chiefs, as

1:22:09.720 --> 1:22:13.080
<v Speaker 1>he mentioned, just sort of inept. But to be expected.

1:22:13.120 --> 1:22:16.599
<v Speaker 1>Sam Donald eighteen of thirty for just one thirty three,

1:22:17.120 --> 1:22:19.519
<v Speaker 1>no touchdowns, no picks. He was sacked once. The Jets

1:22:19.560 --> 1:22:22.240
<v Speaker 1>were two of twelve on third downs. They were two

1:22:22.280 --> 1:22:24.519
<v Speaker 1>of two on fourth but only two and twenty one

1:22:24.560 --> 1:22:27.320
<v Speaker 1>total yards. As we said earlier, so the Jets are

1:22:27.320 --> 1:22:29.600
<v Speaker 1>the only winless team in football. The Steelers still the

1:22:29.600 --> 1:22:32.640
<v Speaker 1>only undefeated team in football. But this is the Patriots

1:22:32.680 --> 1:22:38.439
<v Speaker 1>at the Jets on a Monday night. Yes, okay, listen,

1:22:38.800 --> 1:22:41.000
<v Speaker 1>are the Jets gonna win at any point this year?

1:22:41.240 --> 1:22:45.200
<v Speaker 1>And if they are going to win, isn't this the

1:22:45.240 --> 1:22:50.280
<v Speaker 1>situation on a Monday night or perhaps more accurately Week seventeen.

1:22:51.080 --> 1:22:52.920
<v Speaker 1>I know this because we've been talking about this prop

1:22:52.960 --> 1:22:56.080
<v Speaker 1>at DraftKings on on Primetime Action where they have the

1:22:56.160 --> 1:22:58.639
<v Speaker 1>Jets to go winless, and we've talked about it before.

1:22:59.120 --> 1:23:01.000
<v Speaker 1>It's sort of got popular. Learned when it was plus

1:23:01.000 --> 1:23:03.760
<v Speaker 1>seven hundred something and we were like, that's a great bet.

1:23:03.800 --> 1:23:05.599
<v Speaker 1>Now it's not a good bet because it's like plus

1:23:05.600 --> 1:23:08.400
<v Speaker 1>two d is. But if you're looking at where could

1:23:08.439 --> 1:23:12.519
<v Speaker 1>the Jets lose, it's that Week seventeen squirrelly game against

1:23:12.560 --> 1:23:14.519
<v Speaker 1>the Patriots of the Patriots have nothing to play for.

1:23:15.040 --> 1:23:17.320
<v Speaker 1>Maybe that's the spot where the Jets win, but I

1:23:17.320 --> 1:23:21.120
<v Speaker 1>don't know. This is a Monday night, and I get it.

1:23:21.120 --> 1:23:23.599
<v Speaker 1>It's Bill Belichick. So the Patriots are gonna be favored,

1:23:23.600 --> 1:23:26.040
<v Speaker 1>and they're probably gonna be favored by a nice, healthy amount,

1:23:26.560 --> 1:23:29.320
<v Speaker 1>but that's because it's Belichick. What you see on the field. Now,

1:23:29.360 --> 1:23:31.160
<v Speaker 1>they gotta get the Patriots have to get some bodies

1:23:31.200 --> 1:23:34.400
<v Speaker 1>back because yesterday they didn't have Edelman, they didn't have

1:23:34.479 --> 1:23:37.439
<v Speaker 1>and kill Harry. So it's like, at some point, I

1:23:37.439 --> 1:23:40.040
<v Speaker 1>don't care who you are, you have all those opt

1:23:40.040 --> 1:23:42.960
<v Speaker 1>outs on defense, you need bodies to win an NFL game.

1:23:43.360 --> 1:23:45.880
<v Speaker 1>The Patriots almost beat the Bills yesterday, so they deserve

1:23:45.920 --> 1:23:48.719
<v Speaker 1>a lot of credit for that. But could you also

1:23:48.800 --> 1:23:51.200
<v Speaker 1>see them being in a dog fight with the Jets.

1:23:51.240 --> 1:23:53.880
<v Speaker 1>I kind of could. I'm not saying the Jets are

1:23:53.920 --> 1:23:56.719
<v Speaker 1>gonna win, but whatever this number is, it is probably

1:23:56.720 --> 1:23:58.360
<v Speaker 1>gonna be more than it should be. I will say

1:23:58.400 --> 1:24:06.000
<v Speaker 1>the Patriots minus sick, Yeah, you're low. I see it

1:24:06.040 --> 1:24:12.880
<v Speaker 1>anywhere from seven uh to seven with decent juice on

1:24:12.960 --> 1:24:15.519
<v Speaker 1>the favorite. I did see some seven and a half.

1:24:15.640 --> 1:24:17.760
<v Speaker 1>They seem to be gone unless you want to pay

1:24:17.840 --> 1:24:22.320
<v Speaker 1>some new order and behind the juice. Uh you know,

1:24:22.400 --> 1:24:24.559
<v Speaker 1>I kind of like the higher number here. You know,

1:24:24.640 --> 1:24:27.280
<v Speaker 1>I think I'm gonna probably open seven a half. They'll

1:24:27.320 --> 1:24:30.920
<v Speaker 1>probably grab it off me. Become Monday night, I might

1:24:30.920 --> 1:24:38.000
<v Speaker 1>be uh yeah, I'm probably gonna be rooting for the Jets. Um.

1:24:38.040 --> 1:24:40.360
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, you know, I think the paths right now.

1:24:41.040 --> 1:24:44.760
<v Speaker 1>They they showed, they showed a lot of courage. They

1:24:44.880 --> 1:24:50.240
<v Speaker 1>showed there's still a viable team certainly getting points. This

1:24:50.360 --> 1:24:52.320
<v Speaker 1>may be a spot where they say, you know what,

1:24:52.520 --> 1:24:55.040
<v Speaker 1>let's let it all hang out. We could be more

1:24:55.120 --> 1:24:58.400
<v Speaker 1>button teams like the Jets. The Jets cover one game

1:24:58.479 --> 1:25:02.040
<v Speaker 1>so far this year? Is that what it one? They're

1:25:02.120 --> 1:25:05.519
<v Speaker 1>owen seven on in your standings and Owen seven is

1:25:05.880 --> 1:25:12.679
<v Speaker 1>seven eight and seven in both a t s straight up. Yeah, yeah.

1:25:12.680 --> 1:25:15.040
<v Speaker 1>I thought they might have covered against the Bills like Clintland. Never,

1:25:16.120 --> 1:25:18.599
<v Speaker 1>I'd like the higher number. I think it will probably

1:25:18.720 --> 1:25:20.680
<v Speaker 1>open seven and a half. I'm sure they'll grab it

1:25:20.680 --> 1:25:22.920
<v Speaker 1>off me. But I'm want to take a bet there,

1:25:23.439 --> 1:25:25.360
<v Speaker 1>and like I said, I think come Monday night, I'll

1:25:25.400 --> 1:25:27.559
<v Speaker 1>probably be happy I got it. Christie, You're right. They

1:25:27.600 --> 1:25:30.840
<v Speaker 1>did cover against this degree. They did not cover it was.

1:25:31.120 --> 1:25:34.760
<v Speaker 1>It was eighteen to ten, and I think they did

1:25:34.800 --> 1:25:37.920
<v Speaker 1>cover that. Yeah they did because my bad. Yeah they

1:25:37.920 --> 1:25:40.840
<v Speaker 1>covered one spread and moved. Yeah, I got that down

1:25:40.840 --> 1:25:43.599
<v Speaker 1>twills one on teasers, but they but the Jets actually covered.

1:25:43.640 --> 1:25:46.120
<v Speaker 1>You're right, yeah, that we we sold them short. They

1:25:46.160 --> 1:25:50.679
<v Speaker 1>do have one cover. I had New England yesterday, every

1:25:50.680 --> 1:25:52.920
<v Speaker 1>podcast I did, I had New England. They didn't end

1:25:53.000 --> 1:25:54.960
<v Speaker 1>up being a contest pick for me because of all

1:25:55.000 --> 1:25:57.360
<v Speaker 1>those injuries at the end of the week Edelman and

1:25:57.439 --> 1:25:59.240
<v Speaker 1>Harry and it was just like, okay, like you know,

1:25:59.680 --> 1:26:01.280
<v Speaker 1>at some point, I really like the Patriots, but I

1:26:01.320 --> 1:26:03.200
<v Speaker 1>can't put them in the contest. But I had them

1:26:03.280 --> 1:26:06.400
<v Speaker 1>every other which way, um, and they almost won the game.

1:26:06.920 --> 1:26:09.080
<v Speaker 1>I think I would steer as far clear of this

1:26:09.120 --> 1:26:11.800
<v Speaker 1>Monday night game is humanly possible, and just definitely the

1:26:11.880 --> 1:26:15.160
<v Speaker 1>Jets are o end eight oh and eight and seven

1:26:15.160 --> 1:26:18.360
<v Speaker 1>against one and seven against the spread. I knew we'd

1:26:18.400 --> 1:26:19.920
<v Speaker 1>figure it out by the end of the by the

1:26:20.000 --> 1:26:22.080
<v Speaker 1>end of the show, and eight straight up one and

1:26:22.120 --> 1:26:26.759
<v Speaker 1>seven against the spread. That is your New York Jets, everybody, Um, okay,

1:26:26.760 --> 1:26:28.479
<v Speaker 1>So and the number is then what seven and a

1:26:28.479 --> 1:26:32.760
<v Speaker 1>half in the end, I'm gonna open seven half. It's

1:26:32.840 --> 1:26:36.960
<v Speaker 1>mostly seven, but seven. Most of the sevens have juice

1:26:37.000 --> 1:26:39.760
<v Speaker 1>on the favorite. Okay, so I'm anna open seven half,

1:26:39.840 --> 1:26:41.519
<v Speaker 1>take a bet, and then we'll be at seven. So

1:26:41.600 --> 1:26:47.160
<v Speaker 1>you liked from a bidding standpoint, you liked a lot here, Chris. Yeah,

1:26:47.200 --> 1:26:49.760
<v Speaker 1>I've got four games next to me that I kind

1:26:49.760 --> 1:26:54.599
<v Speaker 1>of like. Um, I like the Broncos getting points. Ravens.

1:26:54.640 --> 1:26:57.200
<v Speaker 1>I think you're buying low on a very very good team.

1:26:57.280 --> 1:27:00.920
<v Speaker 1>What probably you know, maybe not the Steam in the NFL,

1:27:00.960 --> 1:27:04.040
<v Speaker 1>but certainly among the groups who could be second, Like

1:27:04.120 --> 1:27:07.400
<v Speaker 1>the Dolphins getting a big, you know, a decent number

1:27:07.400 --> 1:27:11.200
<v Speaker 1>four and a half. And I like the Bucks, which

1:27:11.240 --> 1:27:13.880
<v Speaker 1>I think that numbers kind of cheak against the Saints.

1:27:13.880 --> 1:27:16.559
<v Speaker 1>I think the Saints are just not that good. I

1:27:16.640 --> 1:27:24.320
<v Speaker 1>like the Ravens, Washington and Tampa Bay. And I also

1:27:24.560 --> 1:27:28.080
<v Speaker 1>like mechanically by the number, I like the Bears, but

1:27:28.160 --> 1:27:31.599
<v Speaker 1>I can't see myself pulling the trigger on it, just

1:27:31.640 --> 1:27:34.639
<v Speaker 1>because I I just don't trust that offense at all.

1:27:35.840 --> 1:27:38.360
<v Speaker 1>So those are the ones. I mean, that's from a

1:27:38.439 --> 1:27:41.479
<v Speaker 1>number standpoint. I think the Bears Titans being six that

1:27:41.520 --> 1:27:43.519
<v Speaker 1>seems a little out of whack, but it's not like

1:27:43.560 --> 1:27:45.960
<v Speaker 1>I rushed to the counter to bet bet the Bears.

1:27:46.280 --> 1:27:48.640
<v Speaker 1>I think I like a lot of these short favorites

1:27:49.479 --> 1:27:52.880
<v Speaker 1>more than their number indicates. So I like Baltimore in Indianapolis.

1:27:52.920 --> 1:27:57.920
<v Speaker 1>If it's just what is the number again, Baltimore Indianapolis? Sure, yeah, no,

1:27:58.040 --> 1:28:02.280
<v Speaker 1>I like. I definitely like Baltimore. I think Washington is

1:28:02.320 --> 1:28:03.960
<v Speaker 1>better than a three or three and a half point

1:28:04.040 --> 1:28:07.800
<v Speaker 1>favorite against the Giants. Whatever you said it was, Oh, jil,

1:28:07.920 --> 1:28:10.600
<v Speaker 1>hang on one second, hang on. The Ravens game is

1:28:10.640 --> 1:28:13.120
<v Speaker 1>going off the board pretty much everywhere. That's because of

1:28:13.120 --> 1:28:18.760
<v Speaker 1>the Yeah, yeah, that's because of Marlin h So that's

1:28:18.800 --> 1:28:21.120
<v Speaker 1>the deal. So the so covid on a J. Dillon

1:28:21.280 --> 1:28:24.360
<v Speaker 1>with the Packers short week here against the Niners, that's

1:28:24.400 --> 1:28:26.840
<v Speaker 1>the most pressing because it's a Thursday night scheduled game.

1:28:27.280 --> 1:28:30.000
<v Speaker 1>And now the Baltimore game with Marlon Humphrey testing positive

1:28:30.040 --> 1:28:33.120
<v Speaker 1>this morning, that game against the Colts is off the board.

1:28:33.240 --> 1:28:34.840
<v Speaker 1>The other one that I really like is Tampa Bay.

1:28:34.840 --> 1:28:37.280
<v Speaker 1>If Tampa Bay is only four against the Saints, that

1:28:37.360 --> 1:28:41.120
<v Speaker 1>might be an all in irresponsible wager on my plan.

1:28:41.439 --> 1:28:45.400
<v Speaker 1>My part on Sunday Night, Chrissie I speak on behalf

1:28:45.400 --> 1:28:48.320
<v Speaker 1>of everybody more than anything. We're so happy you're doing better,

1:28:48.479 --> 1:28:54.040
<v Speaker 1>continued improvements, sir, Well, I'm happy I'm doing better too,

1:28:54.120 --> 1:28:56.439
<v Speaker 1>and thanks everybody. Got a lot of well wishers out there,

1:28:56.520 --> 1:28:59.200
<v Speaker 1>and thank Paul. And I'm very on or that you

1:28:59.200 --> 1:29:01.080
<v Speaker 1>would even take them me in a situation like this.

1:29:01.240 --> 1:29:06.240
<v Speaker 1>Thank you very much, thinking about you. Good talking to you.

1:29:04.840 --> 1:29:11.880
<v Speaker 1>You were kind of you guys. Oh my god, I'm go.

1:29:12.600 --> 1:29:15.280
<v Speaker 1>We love it. Christian coming back and good luck with him.

1:29:15.320 --> 1:29:19.120
<v Speaker 1>Nightcamemall but in the Sports Betting Network