WEBVTT - Cowboys Break: Game Management in D.C.?

0:00:01.680 --> 0:00:04.200
<v Speaker 1>The following is a production of Dallas Cowboys dot Com

0:00:04.200 --> 0:00:07.360
<v Speaker 1>and the Dallas Cowboys Football Club. Are you ready for

0:00:07.400 --> 0:00:11.960
<v Speaker 1>a break? Are you ready for a break? Absolutely ready

0:00:12.200 --> 0:00:15.840
<v Speaker 1>for a break? Yeah, and so much for that. It's

0:00:15.920 --> 0:00:21.800
<v Speaker 1>time for the Break on Dallas Cowboys dot Com with

0:00:21.920 --> 0:00:28.640
<v Speaker 1>Nick Eatman, David Hellman, and bar Garcia and Derek Eagleton. Hello, guys,

0:00:28.680 --> 0:00:34.879
<v Speaker 1>welcome to another show. Nick are smirking. That's rare to

0:00:34.960 --> 0:00:42.440
<v Speaker 1>see going Okay? Well, short, short, yeah, yeah, short, short,

0:00:42.920 --> 0:00:46.800
<v Speaker 1>short show. Um, real quick. Yesterday we spend the whole

0:00:46.840 --> 0:00:50.440
<v Speaker 1>time pretty much talking about Amari Cooper and I wanted

0:00:50.479 --> 0:00:53.440
<v Speaker 1>to really throw it quickly to you. You got a

0:00:53.520 --> 0:00:56.000
<v Speaker 1>chance to get first step on him yesterday and talk

0:00:56.120 --> 0:00:59.800
<v Speaker 1>to talk to him yesterday. I wanted to hear what

0:01:00.040 --> 0:01:02.360
<v Speaker 1>were some of the things that he said? How what

0:01:02.440 --> 0:01:05.479
<v Speaker 1>were your first impressions? Well, this will be short. Um.

0:01:05.880 --> 0:01:09.199
<v Speaker 1>He walked right in, walked by the weight room, locker room,

0:01:09.400 --> 0:01:12.520
<v Speaker 1>went sat down. He didn't talk to anybody else other

0:01:12.600 --> 0:01:15.200
<v Speaker 1>than than our set, and I got to talk to

0:01:15.319 --> 0:01:19.000
<v Speaker 1>him before Jason Garrett, which was which was good. I

0:01:19.040 --> 0:01:21.160
<v Speaker 1>was told he doesn't do a lot of interviews, doesn't

0:01:21.200 --> 0:01:23.000
<v Speaker 1>talk a lot, and I was like, okay, well, well's

0:01:23.319 --> 0:01:25.960
<v Speaker 1>all right, it'll be fine, It'll be fine. And it

0:01:26.000 --> 0:01:27.920
<v Speaker 1>was one of the toughest interviews I've ever done. As

0:01:27.920 --> 0:01:30.480
<v Speaker 1>you can see on the website, he's a nice guy.

0:01:30.680 --> 0:01:33.720
<v Speaker 1>He reminds me of talking to like a ten year

0:01:33.720 --> 0:01:37.200
<v Speaker 1>old eleven year old, a shy kid. If you leave

0:01:37.240 --> 0:01:39.119
<v Speaker 1>them an out, they'll take it. They're not just gonna

0:01:39.120 --> 0:01:41.560
<v Speaker 1>open up. So I didn't ask the best questions in

0:01:41.600 --> 0:01:44.039
<v Speaker 1>the world because he was kind of like, yep, you know.

0:01:44.080 --> 0:01:46.320
<v Speaker 1>I was like, how does that sound, Dallas Cowboy? You know,

0:01:46.360 --> 0:01:48.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm Mark Cooper News Dallas Cowboy, And he was like,

0:01:48.640 --> 0:01:50.920
<v Speaker 1>sounds good. And I knew right then that it was

0:01:50.920 --> 0:01:52.800
<v Speaker 1>going to be on U And it was tough. But

0:01:53.440 --> 0:01:56.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, he talked about working hard, he talked about

0:01:56.080 --> 0:01:58.280
<v Speaker 1>wanting to win games, like that's his focus as to

0:01:58.320 --> 0:02:00.919
<v Speaker 1>win games. And as I said so times on Twitter,

0:02:01.160 --> 0:02:03.240
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of wide receivers around this team in

0:02:03.320 --> 0:02:04.840
<v Speaker 1>the last few years that do a lot of talking.

0:02:05.040 --> 0:02:07.200
<v Speaker 1>So if he's not one that does a lot of talking,

0:02:07.280 --> 0:02:09.480
<v Speaker 1>that's maybe a good thing. Well, at the end of

0:02:09.520 --> 0:02:12.080
<v Speaker 1>the day, can he play, That'll be a lost important

0:02:12.080 --> 0:02:15.680
<v Speaker 1>anyone cares about. We'll see now moving on from that,

0:02:16.440 --> 0:02:18.440
<v Speaker 1>since we spend a lot of time on him yesterday,

0:02:18.520 --> 0:02:21.880
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to touch on real quick. He's here, he practiced,

0:02:21.919 --> 0:02:23.520
<v Speaker 1>We were out there practice. Where is that what you

0:02:23.520 --> 0:02:26.840
<v Speaker 1>were touching on? Big old just big looking dude, fills

0:02:26.880 --> 0:02:30.920
<v Speaker 1>out that uniform. Nice. Yeah, that's always good football. That's

0:02:30.960 --> 0:02:34.560
<v Speaker 1>always good that you're like, you know, you're like, he's

0:02:34.560 --> 0:02:36.720
<v Speaker 1>a stud. I get a good thing to say about

0:02:36.760 --> 0:02:38.720
<v Speaker 1>a guy, but it sounds weird. I get uncomfortable every

0:02:38.760 --> 0:02:40.960
<v Speaker 1>year during Jeff season when people start talking about the

0:02:40.960 --> 0:02:43.120
<v Speaker 1>thickness of the thighs and all that. I'm just like,

0:02:43.280 --> 0:02:45.400
<v Speaker 1>that's a little much. Man. He's got so much for me.

0:02:45.520 --> 0:02:48.079
<v Speaker 1>He got some on him. Jerry Jones is like famous

0:02:48.160 --> 0:02:50.240
<v Speaker 1>quote when he was like, Troyman looks good getting out

0:02:50.280 --> 0:02:52.760
<v Speaker 1>of the shower. Yeah, just like too much for me.

0:02:53.160 --> 0:02:55.480
<v Speaker 1>There's a strange dichotomy there. We don't have to get

0:02:55.520 --> 0:02:58.280
<v Speaker 1>into it on this show, but there's a strange dichotomy

0:02:58.280 --> 0:03:02.120
<v Speaker 1>in football doubt anyway. Well, today the plan is to

0:03:02.120 --> 0:03:05.000
<v Speaker 1>talk about the game since we haven't had a chance

0:03:05.080 --> 0:03:08.240
<v Speaker 1>to do so, even though it's Wednesday already. But there

0:03:08.240 --> 0:03:10.839
<v Speaker 1>are still things to discuss, and I know you two

0:03:10.919 --> 0:03:14.280
<v Speaker 1>have a little debate going on, but before we get

0:03:14.280 --> 0:03:17.880
<v Speaker 1>into it, I wanted to go over the injuries that

0:03:18.080 --> 0:03:21.480
<v Speaker 1>have happened since then. Randy Gregory, he had a minor

0:03:21.639 --> 0:03:25.919
<v Speaker 1>knee scope and he's supposed to be back by the

0:03:25.960 --> 0:03:28.760
<v Speaker 1>time when you're about to say, before you say it,

0:03:28.840 --> 0:03:32.280
<v Speaker 1>go ahead. What is nothing minor about a surgery? Yes, well,

0:03:32.760 --> 0:03:36.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean something like that, but football football and football

0:03:36.560 --> 0:03:39.400
<v Speaker 1>players are insane like that's I mean, yeah, he had

0:03:39.480 --> 0:03:41.600
<v Speaker 1>this minor thing where we went into his knee and

0:03:41.840 --> 0:03:44.960
<v Speaker 1>gug gug loose cartilage out of it and just you know,

0:03:45.320 --> 0:03:47.880
<v Speaker 1>we cut him open, but he's he'll be ready. Cut

0:03:47.960 --> 0:03:50.000
<v Speaker 1>you open for a scope, though, do they? Yeah, I

0:03:50.040 --> 0:03:52.640
<v Speaker 1>mean surgery, Well yeah, you have to go. They open.

0:03:53.520 --> 0:03:55.560
<v Speaker 1>It was just like a little like the distickle. It's

0:03:55.560 --> 0:03:59.320
<v Speaker 1>like almost like a well, like an injection going is

0:04:00.280 --> 0:04:02.960
<v Speaker 1>it's certain you're right now, you're going, you're right. I mean,

0:04:02.960 --> 0:04:07.240
<v Speaker 1>it's not like they it's not like it's put it

0:04:07.280 --> 0:04:11.400
<v Speaker 1>on PBS, but I mean to watch it's they invaded

0:04:11.520 --> 0:04:14.400
<v Speaker 1>his body with the foreign object and doug stuff. Every

0:04:14.400 --> 0:04:18.039
<v Speaker 1>time you get a okay, so downplay this. He got

0:04:18.040 --> 0:04:20.159
<v Speaker 1>a knee scope and they expect him to be ready

0:04:20.160 --> 0:04:23.520
<v Speaker 1>for Monday. That's crazy to me, It's not crazy. That's okay.

0:04:24.000 --> 0:04:28.559
<v Speaker 1>By week to rest very time. Whatever. Chill out today,

0:04:28.640 --> 0:04:31.520
<v Speaker 1>chill out tomorrow, get some rest, take advantage. I've heard

0:04:31.560 --> 0:04:34.039
<v Speaker 1>you wine enough about your running injuries to say, and

0:04:34.080 --> 0:04:36.599
<v Speaker 1>what I do. I keep running through away, just away

0:04:36.640 --> 0:04:41.160
<v Speaker 1>for me, seriously, we're not going back there. You're not

0:04:41.200 --> 0:04:43.920
<v Speaker 1>going back there, need less to say. Based on what

0:04:43.960 --> 0:04:49.040
<v Speaker 1>they said, it's nothing major. It's a minor thing. But

0:04:49.360 --> 0:04:52.080
<v Speaker 1>it's kind of common for these guys to get now.

0:04:52.400 --> 0:04:59.080
<v Speaker 1>Geoff's Jeff Swain. Jeff Swain, he sprained his mcl against

0:04:59.120 --> 0:05:03.479
<v Speaker 1>the Redskins, and any updates on how major this one is.

0:05:03.800 --> 0:05:08.160
<v Speaker 1>No real concrete update. J he was getting an MRI yesterday.

0:05:08.360 --> 0:05:11.360
<v Speaker 1>Jason Garrett's hopeful that it's a sooner rather than later

0:05:11.360 --> 0:05:15.039
<v Speaker 1>type of deal, but he wasn't willing to speak concretely

0:05:15.080 --> 0:05:18.520
<v Speaker 1>about it. Hopeful for some more information later in the week.

0:05:18.800 --> 0:05:21.799
<v Speaker 1>I mean, sprain MCLs always seem to be two to four,

0:05:21.920 --> 0:05:24.000
<v Speaker 1>That's what it always seems to be. I mean, every

0:05:24.000 --> 0:05:26.440
<v Speaker 1>injury is different. I get it. And that's what Malik

0:05:26.520 --> 0:05:28.640
<v Speaker 1>Collins had and he missed. He got he got hurt

0:05:28.680 --> 0:05:30.640
<v Speaker 1>in a week two and he wasn't back until the

0:05:30.880 --> 0:05:34.240
<v Speaker 1>Jags game. So but you know that being said one

0:05:34.320 --> 0:05:37.559
<v Speaker 1>week would be you know, to the buye weekend. Two

0:05:37.600 --> 0:05:40.640
<v Speaker 1>weeks is which and the Titans in a Monday night game.

0:05:40.760 --> 0:05:43.440
<v Speaker 1>Zach Martin, I don't know. I mean, you'd probably call

0:05:43.480 --> 0:05:46.520
<v Speaker 1>it a sprain as well, sprained his knee, but I'd

0:05:46.560 --> 0:05:48.560
<v Speaker 1>be shocked if he's not ready for the Titans game.

0:05:48.680 --> 0:05:52.400
<v Speaker 1>So that's true, but come back into the game. No

0:05:52.440 --> 0:05:54.600
<v Speaker 1>two injuries are the same, and no two players are

0:05:54.640 --> 0:05:57.240
<v Speaker 1>the same. So but since you got seventeen tight ends

0:05:57.240 --> 0:05:59.719
<v Speaker 1>on this team, you can do whatever you can. Bring

0:05:59.760 --> 0:06:01.839
<v Speaker 1>No Brown back and he can be tighten. But that

0:06:01.839 --> 0:06:03.880
<v Speaker 1>doesn't bring up an interesting point though about the tight

0:06:03.960 --> 0:06:06.360
<v Speaker 1>ends it's been. I mean, I think this season we've

0:06:06.400 --> 0:06:09.040
<v Speaker 1>seen that Jeff Swain has been the predominant guy at

0:06:09.040 --> 0:06:11.960
<v Speaker 1>tight end. He's played more than anybody else. That does

0:06:12.000 --> 0:06:14.880
<v Speaker 1>open up a really interesting question of who's going to

0:06:14.920 --> 0:06:17.120
<v Speaker 1>take over that role. Will they be just blitting that

0:06:17.200 --> 0:06:18.840
<v Speaker 1>role and now you're gonna have a different tight end

0:06:18.920 --> 0:06:20.880
<v Speaker 1>in and tight end in their every play, like or

0:06:22.040 --> 0:06:25.480
<v Speaker 1>both terrifying both. I mean, no, that's and that's not

0:06:25.560 --> 0:06:28.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean, Jeff, Jeff's a good player. I don't think

0:06:28.040 --> 0:06:29.800
<v Speaker 1>you're like, oh my god, it's it's not like losing

0:06:29.880 --> 0:06:33.520
<v Speaker 1>Jason Witten, but it still is. That's the best of

0:06:33.520 --> 0:06:35.160
<v Speaker 1>what they have. He is the only one of the

0:06:35.160 --> 0:06:39.039
<v Speaker 1>four that I trust to handle blocking and route running

0:06:39.040 --> 0:06:41.840
<v Speaker 1>assignments and catch the ball when it is thrown at him.

0:06:41.880 --> 0:06:44.640
<v Speaker 1>He's the only one that I remotely trust. Think about

0:06:44.640 --> 0:06:47.120
<v Speaker 1>how many snaps he has and how many targets he

0:06:47.160 --> 0:06:49.680
<v Speaker 1>has this year, I mean that means he's doing what

0:06:49.800 --> 0:06:53.120
<v Speaker 1>he's blocking, and if he's probably the best of that,

0:06:53.200 --> 0:06:56.760
<v Speaker 1>he's actually pretty good. That's pretty good. He's not Martella Spinet,

0:06:56.880 --> 0:06:58.760
<v Speaker 1>but he's not bad at all. And that's actually one

0:06:58.760 --> 0:07:01.080
<v Speaker 1>of the interesting things I think when because if memory

0:07:01.120 --> 0:07:02.719
<v Speaker 1>started to me correct when he first got here, I

0:07:02.720 --> 0:07:05.039
<v Speaker 1>don't think he was that good of a blocker, and

0:07:05.080 --> 0:07:06.599
<v Speaker 1>it seems like that's a part of his game that

0:07:06.600 --> 0:07:08.680
<v Speaker 1>he's developed and worked on and gotten really good at.

0:07:08.760 --> 0:07:10.600
<v Speaker 1>Whitton wasn't a good blocker, No, he wasn't. I mean,

0:07:10.600 --> 0:07:12.280
<v Speaker 1>he's getting away at you. But if you can be

0:07:12.320 --> 0:07:13.920
<v Speaker 1>a tide end that can get in the way. Oh,

0:07:14.000 --> 0:07:16.400
<v Speaker 1>he told me that that's one of the things that

0:07:16.440 --> 0:07:19.280
<v Speaker 1>he's the most proud of, this blocking game and yeah,

0:07:19.440 --> 0:07:24.320
<v Speaker 1>Jeff he I asked him when he got his first touchdown,

0:07:25.080 --> 0:07:27.560
<v Speaker 1>was it Yeah, when he got his first touchdow, I

0:07:27.560 --> 0:07:30.000
<v Speaker 1>asked him, I'm like, hey, how does that feel like? Okay?

0:07:30.160 --> 0:07:32.840
<v Speaker 1>Do you like better now being able to catch the

0:07:32.880 --> 0:07:36.280
<v Speaker 1>ball and make plays or do you prefer blocking? And

0:07:36.320 --> 0:07:40.320
<v Speaker 1>he's like, oh, I prefer blocking. I That's what I

0:07:40.360 --> 0:07:43.840
<v Speaker 1>love doing and that's what he's the most proud of doing.

0:07:43.960 --> 0:07:47.240
<v Speaker 1>So so that's gonna be that's gonna be a big No,

0:07:47.400 --> 0:07:50.160
<v Speaker 1>that would be a big loss. I didn't say it

0:07:50.280 --> 0:07:52.840
<v Speaker 1>is a huge problem if he's out for any extended period.

0:07:52.920 --> 0:07:55.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean, this is one of those situations where the

0:07:55.480 --> 0:07:59.240
<v Speaker 1>depth chart order might be a certain way now because

0:07:59.400 --> 0:08:01.240
<v Speaker 1>you know swaying up there, and then you fill in

0:08:01.240 --> 0:08:03.800
<v Speaker 1>in the other guys. But because of what he does

0:08:03.840 --> 0:08:07.560
<v Speaker 1>predominantly and what that position does, you might see some

0:08:07.640 --> 0:08:11.360
<v Speaker 1>changes in Wait, I mean think about who might start.

0:08:11.520 --> 0:08:14.480
<v Speaker 1>I think Rico probably will start now. Yeah, I might

0:08:14.520 --> 0:08:17.680
<v Speaker 1>be your best flocker. No, it's not gonna be Schultz.

0:08:17.760 --> 0:08:20.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I'm sorry, Um, And I don't know if

0:08:20.600 --> 0:08:22.920
<v Speaker 1>Jarwin's really that that great of a blocker either. I

0:08:22.960 --> 0:08:26.080
<v Speaker 1>think Rico might be your best blocker there. But don't

0:08:26.200 --> 0:08:30.120
<v Speaker 1>don't forget too, You've got some Darian. I can't believe

0:08:30.120 --> 0:08:33.760
<v Speaker 1>I almost went there, almost went there. Who's seventy five Fleming?

0:08:33.840 --> 0:08:38.880
<v Speaker 1>Fleming ran yea, not even thinking about Byron Bell? You

0:08:38.920 --> 0:08:44.120
<v Speaker 1>went back, like way back in the I yeah, that's

0:08:44.120 --> 0:08:46.720
<v Speaker 1>a good point you could use. He really isn't that old,

0:08:46.800 --> 0:08:50.480
<v Speaker 1>dar Now, Darren Williams, isn't that old? You could use

0:08:50.559 --> 0:08:53.240
<v Speaker 1>Cam Fleming as a as a you know, a tackle

0:08:53.280 --> 0:08:56.360
<v Speaker 1>tight end, although obviously he doesn't give you anything as

0:08:56.400 --> 0:09:00.720
<v Speaker 1>a pass catching threat. But that's if Jeff swam. If

0:09:00.760 --> 0:09:03.480
<v Speaker 1>Jeff Swain is out for a serious period of time,

0:09:03.600 --> 0:09:05.840
<v Speaker 1>I think you either need to think about finding another

0:09:05.880 --> 0:09:09.800
<v Speaker 1>tight end or which I don't believe this will happen,

0:09:09.960 --> 0:09:12.680
<v Speaker 1>or adjusting the way you play and using fewer tight ends.

0:09:13.240 --> 0:09:15.840
<v Speaker 1>No I know, yeah, I don't expect that to happen either.

0:09:16.080 --> 0:09:18.559
<v Speaker 1>So well you also, but you don't have Tavon right now,

0:09:18.600 --> 0:09:20.800
<v Speaker 1>so that may affect their ability to want to do that,

0:09:20.800 --> 0:09:22.560
<v Speaker 1>because when you want it to do that, you had

0:09:22.600 --> 0:09:27.520
<v Speaker 1>Tavon in the mix, right That's which is why this

0:09:27.559 --> 0:09:30.160
<v Speaker 1>is so curious and why I'll be interested. You know,

0:09:30.200 --> 0:09:32.800
<v Speaker 1>maybe something will come out today. But also Jason Garrett

0:09:32.800 --> 0:09:35.120
<v Speaker 1>talks again tomorrow, and I'm sure he will be asked

0:09:35.120 --> 0:09:37.560
<v Speaker 1>about that, because I don't like the idea of trying

0:09:37.600 --> 0:09:39.800
<v Speaker 1>to play games without him the way that this team

0:09:39.800 --> 0:09:42.640
<v Speaker 1>likes to play. When do we know anything about Noah

0:09:42.720 --> 0:09:46.040
<v Speaker 1>Brown and when he could possibly be back he can practice?

0:09:46.520 --> 0:09:49.280
<v Speaker 1>Actually saw him this morning doing routes on air, just

0:09:49.600 --> 0:09:54.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, with a strength coach, nothing official or serious looking,

0:09:54.160 --> 0:09:57.520
<v Speaker 1>but running routes. They could start his clock and bring

0:09:57.640 --> 0:09:59.760
<v Speaker 1>him back to practice today if they wanted to, and

0:09:59.840 --> 0:10:05.280
<v Speaker 1>he can play starting week nine, so he could play

0:10:05.320 --> 0:10:07.520
<v Speaker 1>against the Titans if they wanted to do that. But

0:10:07.840 --> 0:10:09.960
<v Speaker 1>the reason why I say this, because he is the

0:10:10.000 --> 0:10:12.080
<v Speaker 1>reason why he has been here I think for so long,

0:10:12.200 --> 0:10:14.000
<v Speaker 1>is because they think he is a value to them

0:10:14.040 --> 0:10:16.840
<v Speaker 1>as a blocker, and they do motion him a lot

0:10:16.880 --> 0:10:19.199
<v Speaker 1>into situations where they want to block in line a

0:10:19.240 --> 0:10:21.400
<v Speaker 1>little bit more, so you know, maybe that's some way

0:10:21.400 --> 0:10:23.480
<v Speaker 1>to offset that a little bit. Well. Also, you gotta

0:10:23.800 --> 0:10:26.520
<v Speaker 1>you know there's more evaluations going on than just him,

0:10:26.559 --> 0:10:30.560
<v Speaker 1>because you've got guys on injury reserve. Two of these

0:10:30.600 --> 0:10:33.920
<v Speaker 1>players can come back this year, he would be one

0:10:33.960 --> 0:10:37.360
<v Speaker 1>of them, and then whoever else you want. Travis Frederick

0:10:37.480 --> 0:10:40.640
<v Speaker 1>was another guy that could be. I don't think anyone

0:10:40.679 --> 0:10:42.760
<v Speaker 1>believes Travis Frederick is going to come back and play

0:10:42.800 --> 0:10:46.160
<v Speaker 1>this year. I don't. I don't anyone that walks they

0:10:46.160 --> 0:10:49.240
<v Speaker 1>can see him walking around, would think that. Yeah, Terrence Williams,

0:10:49.240 --> 0:10:53.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't believe it's coming back again ever, and anybody

0:10:53.760 --> 0:10:59.520
<v Speaker 1>else than I are it's Travis Terrence. So no, you

0:10:59.559 --> 0:11:03.640
<v Speaker 1>know Dayton Jones. Dayton Jones also somebody I completely forgot

0:11:03.640 --> 0:11:06.160
<v Speaker 1>about um so much that I can't even remember his

0:11:06.240 --> 0:11:11.160
<v Speaker 1>freaking name. Um the guard, the guard who heardst there

0:11:11.160 --> 0:11:14.560
<v Speaker 1>you go. Yeah, I forgot all about him as well. Yeah, no,

0:11:14.640 --> 0:11:17.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm you know, completely forgot. I wonder how much they

0:11:17.880 --> 0:11:21.240
<v Speaker 1>could have used him this year. We'll never know those

0:11:21.400 --> 0:11:23.600
<v Speaker 1>the fun what ifs of a football season. That much

0:11:24.160 --> 0:11:27.520
<v Speaker 1>he had work to do. I mean, he came in

0:11:28.160 --> 0:11:31.960
<v Speaker 1>looking like a guard and a tackle, so he needed to. Well.

0:11:32.000 --> 0:11:34.559
<v Speaker 1>When we just talking yesterday about having that bigger body,

0:11:34.679 --> 0:11:37.320
<v Speaker 1>although maybe that helps a little bit, it is it's

0:11:37.320 --> 0:11:39.600
<v Speaker 1>a name to remember for next year when you're talking

0:11:39.640 --> 0:11:43.320
<v Speaker 1>about problems on this offensive line though, just saying yeah,

0:11:43.600 --> 0:11:47.319
<v Speaker 1>so not to I mean, that's February talk or March talk,

0:11:47.400 --> 0:11:54.520
<v Speaker 1>but we've got to talk about something time. Um. And

0:11:54.559 --> 0:11:56.880
<v Speaker 1>then the last guy I almost forgot to mention is

0:11:56.880 --> 0:11:59.840
<v Speaker 1>the cornerback C J. Goodwin, who is expected to have

0:12:00.040 --> 0:12:03.959
<v Speaker 1>surgery after an arm fracture. Another great point, having surgery

0:12:04.000 --> 0:12:06.280
<v Speaker 1>on his broken forearm. I think he had it yesterday

0:12:06.440 --> 0:12:09.280
<v Speaker 1>and literally, like this was the conversation, was like, so

0:12:09.480 --> 0:12:12.520
<v Speaker 1>he'll go on IR and Jason Garrett was like, yeah,

0:12:12.679 --> 0:12:15.920
<v Speaker 1>not necessarily. We'll see, we'll see what his timetable is

0:12:15.920 --> 0:12:18.080
<v Speaker 1>and see if it's realistic to keep him. I'm just like,

0:12:18.280 --> 0:12:22.400
<v Speaker 1>are you insane? Broke your forearm like just snapped it

0:12:22.440 --> 0:12:25.200
<v Speaker 1>in two And they're like, he's wrapping up things. Could

0:12:25.200 --> 0:12:28.800
<v Speaker 1>he'll he's throw on the team in special teams tackles already. Yeah,

0:12:28.800 --> 0:12:30.960
<v Speaker 1>And I'm Barry Church did that two or three years ago.

0:12:31.480 --> 0:12:33.480
<v Speaker 1>Like maybe his bones, I don't know, maybe his bones

0:12:33.520 --> 0:12:37.400
<v Speaker 1>can heal. Hiks. What he's doing is running down on

0:12:37.480 --> 0:12:39.920
<v Speaker 1>punts and making plays. Can you play the cast? Well,

0:12:39.920 --> 0:12:42.319
<v Speaker 1>that's the thing. I mean, it's his it's not his foot,

0:12:42.400 --> 0:12:46.520
<v Speaker 1>it's his right Okay, but you need your arm to tackle,

0:12:46.720 --> 0:12:48.960
<v Speaker 1>not necessarily if you got a cast on it, you

0:12:48.960 --> 0:12:50.960
<v Speaker 1>could still especially if it's kind of cast it doesn't

0:12:51.040 --> 0:12:54.080
<v Speaker 1>encumber his hands. Well didn't he still could? You're you're right,

0:12:54.160 --> 0:12:56.240
<v Speaker 1>right down and make a tackle. You're right. But also

0:12:56.320 --> 0:12:58.960
<v Speaker 1>the main thing there is the rundown there, getting the

0:12:58.960 --> 0:13:01.720
<v Speaker 1>guy's face and make them call faircatch. That's the main

0:13:01.760 --> 0:13:04.920
<v Speaker 1>thing that you know, so especially in today's game. Yeah,

0:13:05.000 --> 0:13:08.760
<v Speaker 1>all right, exactly. Okay, I'm talking about meta humans here.

0:13:08.880 --> 0:13:13.920
<v Speaker 1>They're not they are. They're meta humans. They're different, they're

0:13:14.040 --> 0:13:17.720
<v Speaker 1>different species than the rest of us. Believe that. Okay, Um,

0:13:18.120 --> 0:13:22.199
<v Speaker 1>if they need band aids, probably not. I'm thinking they

0:13:22.240 --> 0:13:25.080
<v Speaker 1>just laughed at all that. Yeah, let's take our first

0:13:25.120 --> 0:13:27.240
<v Speaker 1>break and when we come back, we're gonna get into

0:13:27.400 --> 0:13:29.600
<v Speaker 1>the game, the details of the game play, calling and

0:13:29.640 --> 0:13:32.400
<v Speaker 1>all that, and I'll throw the debate over to that side.

0:13:33.280 --> 0:13:35.840
<v Speaker 1>While a player can look good on paper, it's when

0:13:35.920 --> 0:13:38.040
<v Speaker 1>he's out on the field that you really find out

0:13:38.080 --> 0:13:41.040
<v Speaker 1>what he's made of. That's why the Cowboys rely on

0:13:41.120 --> 0:13:44.559
<v Speaker 1>more than just stats and scouting reports when building their team.

0:13:45.040 --> 0:13:47.760
<v Speaker 1>When picking a tractor, it's why you should rely on

0:13:47.840 --> 0:13:50.440
<v Speaker 1>more than just specs and features. You've got to take

0:13:50.440 --> 0:13:53.320
<v Speaker 1>it out and put it to the test. The Cowboys

0:13:53.320 --> 0:13:57.200
<v Speaker 1>did when they named John Deer their official tractor experience

0:13:57.280 --> 0:14:00.280
<v Speaker 1>one for yourself. I visit my John dear Dealer dot

0:14:00.280 --> 0:14:04.200
<v Speaker 1>com slash football. It's time for tailgate with the autobox boys.

0:14:04.240 --> 0:14:07.360
<v Speaker 1>Autterbox the makers of those crazy protective phonecases so one

0:14:07.400 --> 0:14:10.480
<v Speaker 1>and only. They're also wild about protecting parking lot parties

0:14:10.520 --> 0:14:13.320
<v Speaker 1>from sad drinks. It's why they made elevation tumblers room

0:14:13.360 --> 0:14:15.760
<v Speaker 1>around the crock pot, as they're made from stainless steel

0:14:15.800 --> 0:14:18.720
<v Speaker 1>with a copper lining to keep temps hotter coal true.

0:14:18.760 --> 0:14:21.600
<v Speaker 1>They even coming seven different sizes up to sixty four

0:14:21.680 --> 0:14:25.480
<v Speaker 1>ounce the growler. I like cow waterbox drinks, I mean thinks.

0:14:25.560 --> 0:14:28.240
<v Speaker 1>And that's been tailgating with the autobox boys. Check out

0:14:28.240 --> 0:14:30.760
<v Speaker 1>all the colors and sizes of their elevation tumblers at

0:14:30.800 --> 0:14:33.840
<v Speaker 1>auterbox dot com. Want to use what the pros use?

0:14:34.120 --> 0:14:37.520
<v Speaker 1>How about the official mens skincare brand of the Dallas Cowboys,

0:14:37.680 --> 0:14:40.760
<v Speaker 1>Jack Black. Right now you can get the Jack Black Playmaker,

0:14:40.880 --> 0:14:43.680
<v Speaker 1>a curated collection of Cowboys locker room favorites, for just

0:14:43.760 --> 0:14:47.080
<v Speaker 1>ten bucks with free shipping. The playmaker includes four Jack

0:14:47.120 --> 0:14:50.640
<v Speaker 1>Black skincare favorites, plus a full sized intense therapy lip

0:14:50.640 --> 0:14:53.520
<v Speaker 1>bomb and a Cowboys Can cooler. Go to get Jack

0:14:53.560 --> 0:14:57.360
<v Speaker 1>Black dot com, slash Cowboys and use the code word Cowboys.

0:14:57.640 --> 0:15:02.360
<v Speaker 1>The Jack Black playmaker. Ten Bucks Shipping Star Sports Tours

0:15:02.440 --> 0:15:05.560
<v Speaker 1>is the only official fan travel partner of the Dallas Cowboys,

0:15:05.600 --> 0:15:09.840
<v Speaker 1>offering exclusive game weekend travel packages with sideline access and

0:15:09.920 --> 0:15:13.840
<v Speaker 1>photo ops with current players, alumni and cheerleaders. That's not all, though,

0:15:13.880 --> 0:15:16.400
<v Speaker 1>You'll get to talk x's and those with Senior Director

0:15:16.400 --> 0:15:19.080
<v Speaker 1>of Player Personnel Will McClay and of course with yours

0:15:19.120 --> 0:15:22.120
<v Speaker 1>truly me, Brian broad Us. You can trust the official

0:15:22.160 --> 0:15:24.480
<v Speaker 1>fan travel partner of the Dallas Cowboys, and with us

0:15:24.560 --> 0:15:27.800
<v Speaker 1>you'll travel like a pro Visit Cowboys Travel dot com

0:15:27.800 --> 0:15:32.200
<v Speaker 1>to book your travel package today. A man's stepson doesn't

0:15:32.240 --> 0:15:35.840
<v Speaker 1>just protect him from life's elements, It projects an unstoppable

0:15:35.840 --> 0:15:39.080
<v Speaker 1>and legendary spirit, just like the men wearing silver and

0:15:39.200 --> 0:15:42.360
<v Speaker 1>navy on the field every Sunday sends eighteen sixty five.

0:15:42.560 --> 0:15:46.280
<v Speaker 1>Stetson hats are American made with pride right here in Texas.

0:15:46.360 --> 0:15:49.960
<v Speaker 1>They are still the official crown of all self prospecting Cowboys,

0:15:50.240 --> 0:15:52.480
<v Speaker 1>and Stetson is proud to be on the field with

0:15:52.520 --> 0:15:56.080
<v Speaker 1>America's team. Find steps and hats in the pro shop

0:15:56.240 --> 0:16:02.280
<v Speaker 1>or at Stetson dot com. Today back to the break,

0:16:02.680 --> 0:16:06.080
<v Speaker 1>we are back on the final segment of today's show. Now,

0:16:06.120 --> 0:16:08.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna light up this match and throw it over

0:16:08.240 --> 0:16:11.320
<v Speaker 1>there and walk away. So there's aussion going to be there.

0:16:13.440 --> 0:16:17.640
<v Speaker 1>It's Wednesday, the game ended four days. Stop it. I'm

0:16:17.680 --> 0:16:19.560
<v Speaker 1>gonna get you high up right now, all right, and

0:16:19.640 --> 0:16:22.360
<v Speaker 1>you better bring it if you want to win this argument.

0:16:22.400 --> 0:16:24.520
<v Speaker 1>All right. One of you saying that the play calling

0:16:24.600 --> 0:16:27.280
<v Speaker 1>was good, another one was saying another play calling wasn't good,

0:16:27.640 --> 0:16:30.120
<v Speaker 1>or that it should have been a little different than

0:16:30.320 --> 0:16:33.520
<v Speaker 1>the decisions. Let me started start. I don't even think

0:16:33.520 --> 0:16:36.200
<v Speaker 1>that that that statement is that accurate, but I'll just

0:16:36.360 --> 0:16:40.640
<v Speaker 1>essentially that is. But essentially, because I'm not trying to

0:16:40.680 --> 0:16:43.880
<v Speaker 1>be hypocritical here, Derek knows this. The ball was at

0:16:43.880 --> 0:16:46.400
<v Speaker 1>the thirty seven yard line at one point. He asked me,

0:16:46.440 --> 0:16:48.480
<v Speaker 1>how many more yards do you need? And I said

0:16:48.720 --> 0:16:51.320
<v Speaker 1>thirty seven seven I need I want them to score.

0:16:51.320 --> 0:16:53.000
<v Speaker 1>Maybe that was personal preference. I don't want to go

0:16:53.000 --> 0:16:56.800
<v Speaker 1>to overtime again. Let's do this, Let's let's get it done. Um,

0:16:56.960 --> 0:16:59.920
<v Speaker 1>but I do think just when you when Jason's get

0:17:00.040 --> 0:17:03.680
<v Speaker 1>and killed about managing the game. I think when four

0:17:03.760 --> 0:17:06.840
<v Speaker 1>minutes to go, you're down by ten, and to think,

0:17:06.880 --> 0:17:08.920
<v Speaker 1>you know what, you're gonna have a forty six yard

0:17:08.920 --> 0:17:12.600
<v Speaker 1>field goal to tie this game, everyone would have taken it.

0:17:12.640 --> 0:17:15.280
<v Speaker 1>I thought they managed it well to get to that point,

0:17:15.840 --> 0:17:19.000
<v Speaker 1>forty six yards forty seven yards, and then of course

0:17:19.200 --> 0:17:21.920
<v Speaker 1>we saw what happened. The snapper got an a penalty

0:17:22.000 --> 0:17:23.960
<v Speaker 1>called on him and the kicker missed the kick. So

0:17:24.040 --> 0:17:26.359
<v Speaker 1>but I thought to that point, I thought Jason Garrett

0:17:26.400 --> 0:17:27.919
<v Speaker 1>did a good job of getting him there. Could have

0:17:27.960 --> 0:17:30.159
<v Speaker 1>been better. Yeah, it could have been better, But I

0:17:30.200 --> 0:17:33.520
<v Speaker 1>mean that's that's my taking. And you you made a

0:17:33.560 --> 0:17:35.520
<v Speaker 1>really good point, and I'll own it. Like we were

0:17:35.560 --> 0:17:37.280
<v Speaker 1>on the sideline at the end of that game, and

0:17:37.320 --> 0:17:38.840
<v Speaker 1>I you know, I'm like, well, what do you stand

0:17:38.880 --> 0:17:41.359
<v Speaker 1>to lose by going for the onside kick, like you

0:17:41.480 --> 0:17:43.520
<v Speaker 1>gotta get you have to hold him to a three

0:17:43.520 --> 0:17:45.679
<v Speaker 1>and out, and they did, but you didn't know that

0:17:45.680 --> 0:17:47.920
<v Speaker 1>at the time. So you're like on side kick, if

0:17:47.920 --> 0:17:50.200
<v Speaker 1>you don't get it, you can still get the ball back.

0:17:50.359 --> 0:17:53.720
<v Speaker 1>Even if you're pinned, you still have a chance they

0:17:53.720 --> 0:17:56.000
<v Speaker 1>didn't do that. They played it great. Sean Lee forced

0:17:56.040 --> 0:17:57.960
<v Speaker 1>Alex Smith out of bound. So I agree with you

0:17:58.000 --> 0:18:01.399
<v Speaker 1>in the sense that trailing by ten with four minutes

0:18:01.440 --> 0:18:03.960
<v Speaker 1>to play, they did a really good job to put

0:18:04.000 --> 0:18:09.160
<v Speaker 1>themselves in position to extend the game. But fifty two

0:18:09.160 --> 0:18:12.040
<v Speaker 1>seconds to play and a time out on the opponent's

0:18:12.040 --> 0:18:16.560
<v Speaker 1>forty six yard line, you've been out played basically all day,

0:18:16.680 --> 0:18:20.160
<v Speaker 1>and you have a chance to, in the best case scenario,

0:18:20.280 --> 0:18:23.040
<v Speaker 1>steal a win from the opponent, or, in the worst

0:18:23.080 --> 0:18:26.120
<v Speaker 1>case scenario, kick a field goal. I just I don't

0:18:26.119 --> 0:18:28.720
<v Speaker 1>believe they tried hard enough to put themselves in a

0:18:28.760 --> 0:18:31.080
<v Speaker 1>position to succeed, even if it's only a field goal.

0:18:31.840 --> 0:18:34.679
<v Speaker 1>H This was the sequence. It's first and ten from

0:18:34.720 --> 0:18:37.000
<v Speaker 1>the forty six. They throw a nine yard pass to

0:18:37.119 --> 0:18:40.080
<v Speaker 1>be Beasley along the far side line. He goes out

0:18:40.080 --> 0:18:44.240
<v Speaker 1>of bounds, and do I have that right? Well, it

0:18:44.320 --> 0:18:47.240
<v Speaker 1>says short pass short right to Beasley for nine yards.

0:18:47.320 --> 0:18:49.480
<v Speaker 1>Here we go. No, No, I'm sorry, No, the long

0:18:49.520 --> 0:18:51.679
<v Speaker 1>past to Beasley along the sidelines set them up on

0:18:51.720 --> 0:18:54.520
<v Speaker 1>the forty six. Yes, Then they throw short to Beasley

0:18:54.560 --> 0:18:58.480
<v Speaker 1>along the right side, which two he does not get

0:18:58.480 --> 0:19:01.560
<v Speaker 1>out of bounds and to the credit of people that

0:19:01.680 --> 0:19:04.760
<v Speaker 1>defend this, Like if it's a better thrown ball, Beasley

0:19:04.800 --> 0:19:08.600
<v Speaker 1>probably keeps running and it's a different story. But I

0:19:08.680 --> 0:19:10.760
<v Speaker 1>just I didn't like the way they carried themselves. He

0:19:10.800 --> 0:19:13.680
<v Speaker 1>goes down after nine yards, they jogged to the line.

0:19:13.760 --> 0:19:15.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean they threw that, you know, the play star

0:19:15.760 --> 0:19:17.840
<v Speaker 1>of fifty two seconds left, they snapped the next ball

0:19:17.880 --> 0:19:20.960
<v Speaker 1>with twenty eight it's another pass over the middle, which

0:19:21.240 --> 0:19:23.919
<v Speaker 1>don't like that, and they kind of jogged to the line,

0:19:24.040 --> 0:19:27.680
<v Speaker 1>and then there's a review and then there's twelve seconds left,

0:19:27.720 --> 0:19:30.680
<v Speaker 1>and like, honestly, at that point then you've made your bed.

0:19:30.840 --> 0:19:33.119
<v Speaker 1>So that's not I'm not the guy sitting here saying,

0:19:33.680 --> 0:19:35.360
<v Speaker 1>with twelve seconds to play, you should have been taking

0:19:35.359 --> 0:19:38.200
<v Speaker 1>shots at the end zone. No, with fifty two seconds

0:19:38.200 --> 0:19:40.360
<v Speaker 1>to play, I mean, how many times have we seen

0:19:40.480 --> 0:19:44.120
<v Speaker 1>Jason Witten run the five yard out to move yourself closer?

0:19:44.200 --> 0:19:46.159
<v Speaker 1>You know, like in that situation, like where are the

0:19:46.200 --> 0:19:48.800
<v Speaker 1>short quick passes to get out of bounds? And that's

0:19:49.000 --> 0:19:51.119
<v Speaker 1>Tony Romo was saying it. Obviously we couldn't hear it

0:19:51.119 --> 0:19:53.200
<v Speaker 1>at the time, but Tony Romo is like, I'm running

0:19:53.240 --> 0:19:56.200
<v Speaker 1>short stuff, running slants, I'm keeping my time out alive,

0:19:56.520 --> 0:19:59.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm trying to move into field goal range, and then

0:19:59.040 --> 0:20:00.679
<v Speaker 1>I want to take a want to attack the end

0:20:00.720 --> 0:20:03.679
<v Speaker 1>zone at least a couple of times perfectly said Tony,

0:20:03.760 --> 0:20:06.480
<v Speaker 1>well done. And they didn't do that, Like they got

0:20:06.520 --> 0:20:09.720
<v Speaker 1>literally to the edge of what is considered makeable field

0:20:09.720 --> 0:20:11.520
<v Speaker 1>goal range, and we're like, that's good for us. May

0:20:11.560 --> 0:20:13.879
<v Speaker 1>ask you this question. Let's assume for a second the

0:20:13.920 --> 0:20:16.080
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys went the route that you did and they got

0:20:16.119 --> 0:20:18.320
<v Speaker 1>to a point where they were able to attack and

0:20:18.560 --> 0:20:20.920
<v Speaker 1>actually throw to the end zone. Do you think there

0:20:20.960 --> 0:20:23.159
<v Speaker 1>was any concern by the coach or should have been

0:20:23.200 --> 0:20:25.440
<v Speaker 1>concerned by the coach that if you get into that scenario,

0:20:25.880 --> 0:20:27.200
<v Speaker 1>you don't know that you want to do that. He'd

0:20:27.240 --> 0:20:30.480
<v Speaker 1>already been sacked four times that day, and the likelihood

0:20:30.480 --> 0:20:32.640
<v Speaker 1>that he gets sacked in the situation like that, in

0:20:32.680 --> 0:20:36.480
<v Speaker 1>my mind, there was relatively high probability that that could happen.

0:20:36.520 --> 0:20:38.600
<v Speaker 1>And it then pushes you out of field goal range.

0:20:38.720 --> 0:20:40.840
<v Speaker 1>Are you get off or maybe gets a turnover? Are

0:20:40.840 --> 0:20:43.160
<v Speaker 1>you all concerned about that or the fact that Connor

0:20:43.160 --> 0:20:45.920
<v Speaker 1>Williams couldn't block anyone that day? Lyle Collins was having

0:20:45.920 --> 0:20:48.080
<v Speaker 1>an all kinds of problems. Tyrant Smith. They were getting

0:20:48.080 --> 0:20:50.880
<v Speaker 1>called for holding as well, And if they're gonna sit

0:20:50.920 --> 0:20:53.560
<v Speaker 1>there and call a holding a snap in fraction at

0:20:53.640 --> 0:20:55.719
<v Speaker 1>that point and juncture in the game, then they'll definitely

0:20:55.720 --> 0:20:57.960
<v Speaker 1>call a holding as well. So I think that that

0:20:58.080 --> 0:21:00.400
<v Speaker 1>has to play a factor into like you're are there,

0:21:00.720 --> 0:21:03.200
<v Speaker 1>now you're getting greedy. We could be back and lose

0:21:03.240 --> 0:21:05.959
<v Speaker 1>this whole thing. I have two thoughts to that one.

0:21:06.320 --> 0:21:09.199
<v Speaker 1>Jason Garrett himself said yesterday that as bad as they

0:21:09.240 --> 0:21:13.159
<v Speaker 1>were overall, he thought that the final two scoring or

0:21:13.200 --> 0:21:16.440
<v Speaker 1>the final two drives, the scoring drive, the Dak rushing

0:21:16.480 --> 0:21:19.000
<v Speaker 1>touchdown and then the missfield goal says the cleanest the

0:21:19.000 --> 0:21:22.040
<v Speaker 1>line played all day. So they were playing well according

0:21:22.040 --> 0:21:25.280
<v Speaker 1>to the two drives, they were playing well. On top

0:21:25.320 --> 0:21:29.560
<v Speaker 1>of that, Fabian Moreau, who's your number two cornerback because

0:21:29.640 --> 0:21:34.520
<v Speaker 1>Quentin Dunbar didn't play, gets hurt on the eighteen whatever

0:21:34.600 --> 0:21:38.320
<v Speaker 1>yard completion to Beasley the third down right there. So

0:21:38.640 --> 0:21:41.760
<v Speaker 1>you've got reserves playing corner and so you're over your

0:21:41.760 --> 0:21:46.840
<v Speaker 1>O lines playing well. Washington Secondary's depleted this pro football, Like,

0:21:46.880 --> 0:21:48.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you gotta, yeah, there's a risk, you gotta

0:21:48.840 --> 0:21:51.040
<v Speaker 1>take some risks. If you want to win, and I

0:21:51.080 --> 0:21:54.359
<v Speaker 1>just and like I said, I mean, maybe maybe asking

0:21:54.359 --> 0:21:56.679
<v Speaker 1>them to go score a touchdown is a tall order,

0:21:56.720 --> 0:21:59.359
<v Speaker 1>but with fifty two seconds in a time out, I

0:21:59.480 --> 0:22:01.440
<v Speaker 1>like to think you could at least get down near

0:22:01.480 --> 0:22:03.800
<v Speaker 1>the red zone and at the very least give Bret

0:22:03.800 --> 0:22:06.760
<v Speaker 1>Maher an easy kick instead of a very difficult one.

0:22:06.880 --> 0:22:08.520
<v Speaker 1>I think that's the part I agree with you most on.

0:22:08.680 --> 0:22:10.720
<v Speaker 1>I don't know that I ever would have seeing how

0:22:10.760 --> 0:22:12.400
<v Speaker 1>this game played. I know what he said about those

0:22:12.440 --> 0:22:14.639
<v Speaker 1>last two drives, but I know I was thinking as

0:22:14.640 --> 0:22:17.000
<v Speaker 1>they were driving, don't take a sack. Don't take a sack,

0:22:17.280 --> 0:22:20.120
<v Speaker 1>because they had been in his grill all day, and

0:22:20.200 --> 0:22:23.800
<v Speaker 1>so my thought was they could have probably managed to

0:22:23.840 --> 0:22:26.399
<v Speaker 1>clock better and maybe that gets them an extra player

0:22:26.440 --> 0:22:29.280
<v Speaker 1>two and if they use it on short pit passes,

0:22:30.000 --> 0:22:32.520
<v Speaker 1>that could just kind of move them a little closer. Now,

0:22:32.640 --> 0:22:35.000
<v Speaker 1>even if you get the same exact penalty you got,

0:22:35.040 --> 0:22:37.720
<v Speaker 1>you still are within range for Brett Maha to be

0:22:37.720 --> 0:22:40.160
<v Speaker 1>able to make that kick. And you know, I think

0:22:40.280 --> 0:22:42.439
<v Speaker 1>without the penalty, I think that kid goes in, you know,

0:22:42.520 --> 0:22:45.040
<v Speaker 1>just a little bit back further and him pulling it

0:22:45.119 --> 0:22:47.000
<v Speaker 1>just a slight bit to where it hit the upright.

0:22:47.240 --> 0:22:48.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that happens if he's got four more

0:22:48.880 --> 0:22:50.760
<v Speaker 1>five more yards. So if they would have just done

0:22:50.880 --> 0:22:53.080
<v Speaker 1>enough to get that five more yards, you probably have

0:22:53.119 --> 0:22:55.280
<v Speaker 1>a different outcome. So I agree with you from that stamp. Well,

0:22:55.320 --> 0:22:58.960
<v Speaker 1>and it's a it's a systematic thing with football coaches,

0:22:59.000 --> 0:23:02.040
<v Speaker 1>and this is an this isn't Jason Garrett specific, but

0:23:02.040 --> 0:23:05.560
<v Speaker 1>I I really truly believe like most football coaches, in

0:23:05.600 --> 0:23:08.440
<v Speaker 1>their heart of hearts are going to make the decision

0:23:08.880 --> 0:23:13.320
<v Speaker 1>that's easier to defend than than necessarily the right decision. Yeah,

0:23:13.320 --> 0:23:15.720
<v Speaker 1>I do. I don't think, I really I think. I

0:23:15.800 --> 0:23:17.680
<v Speaker 1>think the public perception is I really don't. It's not

0:23:17.720 --> 0:23:20.720
<v Speaker 1>about I don't. I don't think most coaches do. I

0:23:21.240 --> 0:23:24.960
<v Speaker 1>it's not so much public perception, but like people get

0:23:24.960 --> 0:23:27.080
<v Speaker 1>fired over this stuff, and so I think, like when

0:23:27.280 --> 0:23:30.000
<v Speaker 1>at the end of the day, they want to be like, well,

0:23:30.000 --> 0:23:31.280
<v Speaker 1>what what do you want me to do? Like I

0:23:31.320 --> 0:23:34.560
<v Speaker 1>did the smart thing instead of the bold thing. So

0:23:34.560 --> 0:23:36.440
<v Speaker 1>how many times, how do we account for? How many

0:23:36.440 --> 0:23:39.320
<v Speaker 1>times over the last two or three weeks in the

0:23:39.400 --> 0:23:42.919
<v Speaker 1>NFL have we seen coaches do unconventional things and a

0:23:42.920 --> 0:23:45.120
<v Speaker 1>lot of them have backfired on them and it ended

0:23:45.160 --> 0:23:47.560
<v Speaker 1>up being I call that didn't win the game. I

0:23:47.560 --> 0:23:49.840
<v Speaker 1>think it's changing, and I don't think it's a coincidence

0:23:49.880 --> 0:23:51.800
<v Speaker 1>that a lot of those types of decisions are younger,

0:23:51.880 --> 0:23:54.879
<v Speaker 1>newer head coaches making them, like Doug Peterson and Mike Rabel.

0:23:55.080 --> 0:23:57.320
<v Speaker 1>And a lot of this has to do, in my opinion,

0:23:57.359 --> 0:23:59.639
<v Speaker 1>with the overtime rules that I think have got to

0:23:59.680 --> 0:24:02.720
<v Speaker 1>be I hate, You've got to get this thing figured

0:24:02.720 --> 0:24:06.040
<v Speaker 1>out in some way in overtime. I don't care about

0:24:06.040 --> 0:24:08.520
<v Speaker 1>the TV. I know they do a TV and the

0:24:08.600 --> 0:24:11.400
<v Speaker 1>time and all that stuff, but I think it's affecting things.

0:24:11.440 --> 0:24:13.399
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's like, you know what, I got a

0:24:13.400 --> 0:24:15.040
<v Speaker 1>better shot to go win this game at the two

0:24:15.040 --> 0:24:18.200
<v Speaker 1>point conversion than to go to play overtime. We're seeing

0:24:18.200 --> 0:24:20.600
<v Speaker 1>that a little bit more. That's another point too, which

0:24:20.760 --> 0:24:22.959
<v Speaker 1>is like you know, you're like, well they haven't been

0:24:23.000 --> 0:24:26.200
<v Speaker 1>playing and well all day, like just just get to overtime. Well,

0:24:26.320 --> 0:24:31.320
<v Speaker 1>let's play out overtime. Like worst case scenario, Washington gets

0:24:31.359 --> 0:24:33.800
<v Speaker 1>the ball, drives down the field. Okay, if they score

0:24:33.800 --> 0:24:35.440
<v Speaker 1>a touchdown, games over. So let's say they kick a

0:24:35.480 --> 0:24:38.000
<v Speaker 1>field goal, they kick off back to you and you

0:24:38.040 --> 0:24:40.560
<v Speaker 1>start at your twenty five, and now you've got to

0:24:40.640 --> 0:24:43.880
<v Speaker 1>go at least fifty yards to get into makeable fuel

0:24:43.920 --> 0:24:47.199
<v Speaker 1>goal range, if not the whole seventy five yards to

0:24:47.240 --> 0:24:48.520
<v Speaker 1>win the game. You don't know how much time you

0:24:48.560 --> 0:24:50.360
<v Speaker 1>got on the clock exactly. You could get the ball

0:24:50.400 --> 0:24:54.520
<v Speaker 1>back with two minutes for or whatever. So even if

0:24:54.520 --> 0:24:58.159
<v Speaker 1>you get to overtime, your offense, unless something crazy happens

0:24:58.160 --> 0:25:00.359
<v Speaker 1>like a pick six, your offense has to put together

0:25:00.760 --> 0:25:04.639
<v Speaker 1>a fifty sixty seventy yard drive instead, you're already on

0:25:04.680 --> 0:25:07.560
<v Speaker 1>the forty six. Why not just try to end the

0:25:07.560 --> 0:25:09.680
<v Speaker 1>thing right there? Like and again, I know it's a

0:25:09.720 --> 0:25:12.080
<v Speaker 1>lot easier said than done, but they didn't even really try,

0:25:12.200 --> 0:25:13.719
<v Speaker 1>right and that they did the issue issues that they

0:25:13.720 --> 0:25:16.359
<v Speaker 1>didn't try. They didn't try at all, And I don't think, honestly,

0:25:16.400 --> 0:25:18.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't think the results would have been different. Probably

0:25:18.560 --> 0:25:20.640
<v Speaker 1>I do think that the results could have probably turned

0:25:20.640 --> 0:25:22.320
<v Speaker 1>out to them having a few more yards and maybe

0:25:22.359 --> 0:25:24.520
<v Speaker 1>that gets you to overtime, But I don't, I don't know.

0:25:24.680 --> 0:25:26.480
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that they necessarily get at the endzone.

0:25:26.560 --> 0:25:29.680
<v Speaker 1>It no, and the way that even if they were trying,

0:25:29.680 --> 0:25:31.480
<v Speaker 1>I don't know that they necessarily getting enzone, no doubt

0:25:31.520 --> 0:25:33.440
<v Speaker 1>about it, There's no I can't sit here and say

0:25:33.440 --> 0:25:35.679
<v Speaker 1>they definitely would have scored. This offense doesn't deserve that

0:25:35.720 --> 0:25:38.600
<v Speaker 1>benefit of the doubt. But when Cole Beasley catches the

0:25:38.640 --> 0:25:41.720
<v Speaker 1>ball for nine yards at the Washington thirty seven with

0:25:42.040 --> 0:25:46.560
<v Speaker 1>thirty two seconds to play, and there's like no urgency whatsoever,

0:25:46.680 --> 0:25:49.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm just like, what's going on here? Why are y'all?

0:25:49.320 --> 0:25:51.320
<v Speaker 1>Why is this good enough for y'all? What would you

0:25:51.400 --> 0:25:53.399
<v Speaker 1>like to see them do in that situation? Are you

0:25:53.400 --> 0:25:56.320
<v Speaker 1>wanting them to run ups clock the ball that stops

0:25:56.359 --> 0:25:58.880
<v Speaker 1>the clock, because I assume you're still believing that they

0:25:58.880 --> 0:26:01.960
<v Speaker 1>need to save that time out right. If let's say, okay,

0:26:02.000 --> 0:26:04.880
<v Speaker 1>they completed to Beasley for nine yards, I probably run

0:26:04.960 --> 0:26:07.199
<v Speaker 1>like a quick sneak or a quick run or no,

0:26:07.320 --> 0:26:10.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry, spike the ball quick. So then it's third

0:26:10.359 --> 0:26:14.000
<v Speaker 1>and one, quick play, slant route somethings or something to

0:26:14.040 --> 0:26:16.480
<v Speaker 1>the outside, and then see where we're at at that

0:26:16.560 --> 0:26:20.040
<v Speaker 1>point they were at is because that's what I was

0:26:20.040 --> 0:26:21.560
<v Speaker 1>gonna say. At that point they would have been well,

0:26:21.600 --> 0:26:23.040
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't have been third and one? I would have you

0:26:23.040 --> 0:26:25.080
<v Speaker 1>would have spiked it to get to third and one right,

0:26:25.119 --> 0:26:27.080
<v Speaker 1>and then it would have been third and one at

0:26:27.200 --> 0:26:31.080
<v Speaker 1>the Washington thirty one, So you're already in field goal range.

0:26:31.080 --> 0:26:33.479
<v Speaker 1>You would assume, right, you're assuming at that point as

0:26:33.520 --> 0:26:38.360
<v Speaker 1>long as you want to take a sack at that point.

0:26:38.160 --> 0:26:41.080
<v Speaker 1>Thirty yes, thirty seven, you're right, you're right. Yeah, I

0:26:41.119 --> 0:26:44.719
<v Speaker 1>mean you said something though about you five more yards

0:26:44.760 --> 0:26:46.880
<v Speaker 1>would have you know, it would have been a difference there,

0:26:46.880 --> 0:26:49.160
<v Speaker 1>and they could have gotten five more yards, but they

0:26:49.359 --> 0:26:52.320
<v Speaker 1>they did that though they were already there. They were

0:26:52.359 --> 0:26:55.000
<v Speaker 1>there for a forty seven yard field goal. Right. My

0:26:55.040 --> 0:26:57.520
<v Speaker 1>point is, if you had one more play and let's

0:26:57.560 --> 0:26:59.960
<v Speaker 1>say you could pick up five more yards, then even

0:27:00.080 --> 0:27:02.640
<v Speaker 1>with the penalty, he still are at you know, you're

0:27:02.640 --> 0:27:05.359
<v Speaker 1>still kicking a field goal that's under fifty and with

0:27:05.440 --> 0:27:07.960
<v Speaker 1>those extra yards, I think pulling it means it probably

0:27:07.960 --> 0:27:10.280
<v Speaker 1>even if it hits up right, scan it scantly hits

0:27:10.280 --> 0:27:13.280
<v Speaker 1>it and bounces end versus hitting it square and bouncing

0:27:13.280 --> 0:27:16.960
<v Speaker 1>back right. I mean, or you know them on the

0:27:17.040 --> 0:27:19.760
<v Speaker 1>lat on the drive before that, the swing pass to

0:27:19.880 --> 0:27:23.000
<v Speaker 1>Zeke that inexplic like the weirdest play of the entire game,

0:27:23.000 --> 0:27:26.480
<v Speaker 1>where Zach zach Dac missed Zeke on a swing route.

0:27:26.720 --> 0:27:30.159
<v Speaker 1>Run that again. Run something towards the sideline. Again, I

0:27:30.200 --> 0:27:32.199
<v Speaker 1>know he's not on the team, but somebody else can

0:27:32.280 --> 0:27:34.520
<v Speaker 1>run Jason Witten's route that he was so good at.

0:27:34.600 --> 0:27:37.560
<v Speaker 1>You run three yards, does it regularly break towards the sideline,

0:27:38.080 --> 0:27:40.320
<v Speaker 1>something that's going to stop the clock. And again I

0:27:40.920 --> 0:27:44.400
<v Speaker 1>completely agree it's a slim bet that they actually score

0:27:44.400 --> 0:27:48.040
<v Speaker 1>a touchdown. But just the lack of even trying, and

0:27:48.119 --> 0:27:50.520
<v Speaker 1>you can even take an argument and don't even say that,

0:27:50.680 --> 0:27:53.159
<v Speaker 1>just say don't just like the Baltimore game five or

0:27:53.200 --> 0:27:55.600
<v Speaker 1>six years ago, where you know they're like, well, Bailey

0:27:55.680 --> 0:27:57.560
<v Speaker 1>for fifty one like that, you know he can make it.

0:27:57.600 --> 0:28:00.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you don't have to settle for a kick.

0:28:00.480 --> 0:28:03.240
<v Speaker 1>You can try to make it an extra point type

0:28:03.359 --> 0:28:06.680
<v Speaker 1>field goal. Right, It's a tough balance. I just think overall,

0:28:07.200 --> 0:28:10.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't think game management there was poor. They had

0:28:10.000 --> 0:28:12.879
<v Speaker 1>a chance to tie the game, and weird things happened

0:28:12.920 --> 0:28:15.320
<v Speaker 1>and they missed. But I mean, I don't disagree one

0:28:15.400 --> 0:28:17.040
<v Speaker 1>hundred percent. You could have done a little bit more.

0:28:17.240 --> 0:28:19.480
<v Speaker 1>But I can see with the way that Lyon was playing,

0:28:19.680 --> 0:28:22.280
<v Speaker 1>which when that goes, okay, forget what I you know,

0:28:22.560 --> 0:28:24.640
<v Speaker 1>if you disagree with me. Forget what I said about

0:28:24.760 --> 0:28:27.879
<v Speaker 1>coaching coaches making safe decisions. But I can see in

0:28:27.960 --> 0:28:31.960
<v Speaker 1>Jason Garrett's mind, you are in Brett Maher's makeable range,

0:28:32.320 --> 0:28:35.080
<v Speaker 1>and if you keep throwing the ball and something terrible happens,

0:28:35.600 --> 0:28:38.560
<v Speaker 1>then you get killed for yeah, for being greedy when

0:28:38.600 --> 0:28:41.880
<v Speaker 1>you're already in his range. But it's a windy day

0:28:42.040 --> 0:28:45.560
<v Speaker 1>outdoors in the fall. I would at least try to

0:28:45.600 --> 0:28:48.480
<v Speaker 1>get him closer. But every time you started relying on

0:28:48.920 --> 0:28:51.480
<v Speaker 1>who you think would get the job done for you

0:28:51.680 --> 0:28:53.440
<v Speaker 1>does when he bites you in the butt. But isn't

0:28:53.440 --> 0:28:55.840
<v Speaker 1>that also the definition of what it is to be

0:28:56.120 --> 0:28:59.680
<v Speaker 1>versus a conservative coach versus more aggressive coaching. He keeps

0:28:59.680 --> 0:29:02.400
<v Speaker 1>maintain and he's an aggressive coach, but what we've seen

0:29:02.440 --> 0:29:05.480
<v Speaker 1>this year suggests that that's not necessarily the case. In

0:29:05.480 --> 0:29:08.000
<v Speaker 1>this instance, the instance of going forward on fourth down,

0:29:08.240 --> 0:29:10.680
<v Speaker 1>those are more he's shown more of an example of

0:29:10.720 --> 0:29:15.560
<v Speaker 1>being of being a conservative minded coach than an aggressive line.

0:29:15.560 --> 0:29:18.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. I think he's he's he's showing that

0:29:18.120 --> 0:29:21.680
<v Speaker 1>he's a coach that's actually seeing what's happening and going, Okay,

0:29:21.680 --> 0:29:24.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna play off the percentages here right then, that's

0:29:24.280 --> 0:29:26.520
<v Speaker 1>what conservative is. We didn't get one inch on third

0:29:26.520 --> 0:29:28.160
<v Speaker 1>and one, so now on fourth and one, we're gonna

0:29:28.200 --> 0:29:30.080
<v Speaker 1>get it. Our defense is playing well. I have a

0:29:30.120 --> 0:29:32.840
<v Speaker 1>good punter. I can stop. I'm not disagreeing. I'm saying,

0:29:32.840 --> 0:29:35.440
<v Speaker 1>but that's the definition of conservative. Conservative means I'm gonna

0:29:35.480 --> 0:29:39.600
<v Speaker 1>calculate everything, and I'm gonna make it calculated decision. Aggressive

0:29:39.600 --> 0:29:41.760
<v Speaker 1>means I listen all that, but I'm gonna go with

0:29:41.880 --> 0:29:43.680
<v Speaker 1>my gut and say I'm just gonna go for it

0:29:43.680 --> 0:29:44.920
<v Speaker 1>because I think that's what I need to do in

0:29:45.000 --> 0:29:46.800
<v Speaker 1>order to get a win. That's why to me, playing

0:29:46.800 --> 0:29:48.600
<v Speaker 1>to win the game and playing to not lose the

0:29:48.600 --> 0:29:50.760
<v Speaker 1>game is the exact same. That's why I believe that

0:29:50.800 --> 0:29:52.960
<v Speaker 1>for that very reason right there is that it's it's

0:29:53.000 --> 0:29:56.560
<v Speaker 1>all the same either way, the result is exactly the same.

0:29:56.560 --> 0:29:59.520
<v Speaker 1>Whether you're aggressive to get there or you're calculated, it's

0:29:59.560 --> 0:30:02.800
<v Speaker 1>the same. That's I can argue this all day. We

0:30:03.560 --> 0:30:05.760
<v Speaker 1>every time a game ends this way. Nick and I

0:30:05.880 --> 0:30:08.200
<v Speaker 1>fight about this because and it's it's fine. I see

0:30:08.200 --> 0:30:11.880
<v Speaker 1>his point, but I think that's yeah, read the situation,

0:30:11.960 --> 0:30:15.560
<v Speaker 1>and I just think being aggressive more aggressive there it

0:30:15.600 --> 0:30:17.680
<v Speaker 1>gives you your best chance to win, and that's at

0:30:17.720 --> 0:30:19.360
<v Speaker 1>the end of the day. Jason Garrett still has to

0:30:19.400 --> 0:30:21.800
<v Speaker 1>make those decisions, so he gets credit for them. But

0:30:21.880 --> 0:30:27.000
<v Speaker 1>I believe most of his aggressive decisions have been painfully obvious.

0:30:27.120 --> 0:30:30.000
<v Speaker 1>But it's not like he's it's not like they're truly

0:30:30.080 --> 0:30:32.360
<v Speaker 1>that aggressive. It's like, well, yeah, it's fourth and half

0:30:32.400 --> 0:30:34.160
<v Speaker 1>an inch, of course, you know. That kind of goes

0:30:34.200 --> 0:30:36.080
<v Speaker 1>back to my point too real quick. When you guys

0:30:36.120 --> 0:30:38.840
<v Speaker 1>talk about coaches caring what the what they're gonna get

0:30:38.920 --> 0:30:41.080
<v Speaker 1>killed for, if that were the case, I think he

0:30:41.080 --> 0:30:42.800
<v Speaker 1>would have been more aggressive because what does he getting

0:30:42.840 --> 0:30:45.600
<v Speaker 1>killed for right now? Being too conservative, he decided, I'm

0:30:45.640 --> 0:30:47.840
<v Speaker 1>gonna still go with the percentages. The percentages say, we

0:30:47.920 --> 0:30:50.080
<v Speaker 1>get into this range, we're gonna be a little more

0:30:50.760 --> 0:30:52.760
<v Speaker 1>thoughtful about what we're gonna do, and we're gonna put

0:30:53.080 --> 0:30:54.880
<v Speaker 1>our kicker out there and try to make that field goal.

0:30:55.040 --> 0:30:57.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't think he really cared about what people fuck

0:30:57.440 --> 0:30:59.880
<v Speaker 1>because that did. That's not what played out, you know. Well,

0:31:00.080 --> 0:31:02.520
<v Speaker 1>percentages also said that you know, you keep you keep

0:31:02.680 --> 0:31:05.240
<v Speaker 1>going back there to pass, you're gonna get another sack. Yeah,

0:31:05.600 --> 0:31:08.080
<v Speaker 1>so you know, and that that would have hurt everything

0:31:08.080 --> 0:31:10.240
<v Speaker 1>as well. So I don't know. I just think he

0:31:10.600 --> 0:31:13.880
<v Speaker 1>kind of played the situation he had it there. You know,

0:31:14.040 --> 0:31:15.880
<v Speaker 1>if you if you think, you know, you know what,

0:31:16.000 --> 0:31:17.840
<v Speaker 1>I need five more yards because they might call a

0:31:17.920 --> 0:31:19.760
<v Speaker 1>penalty that we have never seen in the last thirty

0:31:19.760 --> 0:31:21.960
<v Speaker 1>one years. So if they do that, then we're going

0:31:22.000 --> 0:31:24.280
<v Speaker 1>to be screwed. Yeah, if they win this game. I

0:31:24.320 --> 0:31:26.840
<v Speaker 1>wonder if I wonder if people would have said the

0:31:26.880 --> 0:31:30.120
<v Speaker 1>same thing about about how it all played out. I know, Dave,

0:31:30.200 --> 0:31:32.280
<v Speaker 1>you were on the sideline saying, what are we what

0:31:32.320 --> 0:31:34.160
<v Speaker 1>are they doing? Why are they not having more why

0:31:34.160 --> 0:31:35.760
<v Speaker 1>are they not more urgent? But get that. If I

0:31:35.960 --> 0:31:38.360
<v Speaker 1>wonder how many people would be saying that if they

0:31:37.920 --> 0:31:41.320
<v Speaker 1>because her miss isn't against Detroit, then they didn't get

0:31:41.320 --> 0:31:43.520
<v Speaker 1>close enough there. Then they shouldn't have taken that one

0:31:43.520 --> 0:31:45.480
<v Speaker 1>play where he just rolled off to the side to

0:31:45.480 --> 0:31:47.160
<v Speaker 1>get to the middle. They should have done something to

0:31:47.200 --> 0:31:49.840
<v Speaker 1>get seven more yards. So he didn't hook the ball

0:31:50.000 --> 0:31:53.040
<v Speaker 1>against Detroit. And that you don't think like that. Coaches

0:31:53.160 --> 0:31:56.320
<v Speaker 1>never never really get hey, good job, good managing the game.

0:31:56.360 --> 0:31:58.280
<v Speaker 1>It's always when they lose. And that's the nature of

0:31:58.280 --> 0:32:00.760
<v Speaker 1>the business that comes with the Dinners would say, and yeah,

0:32:00.760 --> 0:32:03.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I pat myself on the back because it's

0:32:03.640 --> 0:32:06.560
<v Speaker 1>not hindsight. I was questioning these decisions as they were happening.

0:32:06.920 --> 0:32:08.600
<v Speaker 1>But if they had found a way to win the game,

0:32:09.120 --> 0:32:12.040
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't be hard to argue that I would be like, well,

0:32:12.080 --> 0:32:14.040
<v Speaker 1>I would have done but it worked out. So we

0:32:14.200 --> 0:32:16.840
<v Speaker 1>move on to the next subject. All right, Well, this

0:32:16.960 --> 0:32:20.920
<v Speaker 1>was a great debate and a good conversation. Thank you

0:32:20.960 --> 0:32:24.440
<v Speaker 1>everyone for your opinions, but we do have to end

0:32:24.440 --> 0:32:26.360
<v Speaker 1>the show. We have to head to the locker room

0:32:26.400 --> 0:32:28.440
<v Speaker 1>and listen to what these players have to say about

0:32:28.480 --> 0:32:32.880
<v Speaker 1>all this mess. So let's figure that out. For Derek Kingleton,

0:32:32.960 --> 0:32:35.560
<v Speaker 1>Nicki Man, David Hellman, and Burgercia. This has been the

0:32:35.600 --> 0:32:39.160
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys Break on Dallas Cowboys dot Com Radio. This has

0:32:39.200 --> 0:32:42.040
<v Speaker 1>been a production of Dallas Cowboys dot Com and the

0:32:42.200 --> 0:32:43.800
<v Speaker 1>Dallas Cowboys Football Club.