Speaker 1: To all of you for being with us.
Speaker 2: Write down our toll free telephone number you want to
Speaker 2: be a part of the program. It is eight hundred
Speaker 2: ninety four one Sean if you want to join us, Linda,
Speaker 2: how long have I been saying that this is the
Speaker 2: most unpredictable midterm election year in our lifetime? And these
Speaker 2: are uncharted waters, and nobody as of today can predict
Speaker 2: with any degree of certainty what is going to happen
Speaker 2: in this midterm. The only thing I can tell those
Speaker 2: of you that want hope is that this is probably
Speaker 2: the greatest environment for a party in power, which historically
Speaker 2: tends to lose seats in the House and Senate. There
Speaker 2: have been exceptions for Republicans to gain seats in the
Speaker 2: House and the Senate, which we will go through in
Speaker 2: great specificity in detail. How long have I been saying that?
Speaker 2: I've been saying this now for the longest time. I'm
Speaker 2: now I think I've been proven correct, have I not?
Speaker 3: Yeah?
Speaker 1: It's pretty bad. Okay, So you have.
Speaker 2: This woman, what is it, Darien Liza Chevalier. So we
Speaker 2: had these elections last week. Now, we have spent a
Speaker 2: lot of time on this program going over Graham Platner
Speaker 2: in Maine and all the insane things that he has
Speaker 2: said and his Nazi tattoo.
Speaker 1: We won't regurgitate that. Now.
Speaker 2: We have talked about the Senate candidate in Michigan by
Speaker 2: the name of El Sayed, and El Sayed is a
Speaker 2: guy that is a radical who's been campaigning with hasan Piker,
Speaker 2: a guy on record is as saying America deserved nine
Speaker 2: to eleven. We have gone all through six. Gender tell
Speaker 2: Rico God is non binary. He defends the right of
Speaker 2: trans men to have access to abortion, which I'm having
Speaker 2: a hard time understanding, but he does. He wants to
Speaker 2: welcome out at the southern border in the state of Texas,
Speaker 2: and the guy that wants to run a vegan campaign
Speaker 2: in Texas, and for whatever reason, it is the takeover
Speaker 2: of this party. I think you can argue after last
Speaker 2: week is now complete now and there's a couple of
Speaker 2: things that are happening simultaneously that you have to pay
Speaker 2: attention to. Not only are the Democrats endorsing and electing
Speaker 2: these radicals, but people that you would think might stand
Speaker 2: up against the Nazi tattoo, or stand up against the
Speaker 2: guy that blames victims of sexual assault, or is not
Speaker 2: sympathetic to a young girl that wants to commit suicide,
Speaker 2: or a guy that says the people that he wants
Speaker 2: to vote for him a racist and stupid. You would
Speaker 2: think that maybe some Democrats would have at least a
Speaker 2: little moral clarity and a willingness to take on that
Speaker 2: radical element that has now emerged within their party. But
Speaker 2: it's not happening. If anything, just the opposite is happening.
Speaker 2: They're embracing them. And so it got worse last week.
Speaker 2: And I would argue that the Democratic Socialists of America,
Speaker 2: the DSA, which is the Mamdani group, which really is
Speaker 2: like communists.
Speaker 1: I mean, Graham Platner claims he's a communist.
Speaker 2: So what's happened is all of these radicals now going
Speaker 2: up against more traditional Democrats, definitely left of center, far
Speaker 2: from conservative, far from Donald Trump supporters, and they are
Speaker 2: wiping them out in pretty much every race where it's
Speaker 2: taken place.
Speaker 1: I'll give you an example.
Speaker 2: This woman Chevalier is shelled off this massive political upset,
Speaker 2: and she defeated a five term incumbent in New York
Speaker 2: by the name of Representative Adriano Espolot. She is one
Speaker 2: of she's like Mumdani, a Democratic socialist. She has said
Speaker 2: on the record, she said, quote, no more police at all. Ever, well,
Speaker 2: if you don't have policing, what do you have If
Speaker 2: you don't have law and order, how do you have
Speaker 2: safety and security? How many times have we said on
Speaker 2: this program that it is a prerequisite towards the pursuit
Speaker 2: of happiness, that first you have to have law and order.
Speaker 1: It's basic common sense.
Speaker 2: She has been again, like many in the squad and
Speaker 2: people like Graham Plattner and others, she has been totally
Speaker 2: against the state of Israel. The rise of anti Semitism
Speaker 2: now in the Democratic Party is through the roof, which
Speaker 2: raises a lot of questions to me about where Chuck
Speaker 2: Schumer stands on any of this. I think Chuck Schumer
Speaker 2: has become probably the biggest moral coward in in Senate
Speaker 2: history at this particular point in time. This is a
Speaker 2: woman that supported the Block of Bombs Act to halt
Speaker 2: US defense exports to Israel. I mean, that's how deep
Speaker 2: this runs. Now Here might be one of the worst
Speaker 2: things that this woman did. Maybe there's a lot of them.
Speaker 2: Remember October seventh, twenty twenty three, we had you know,
Speaker 2: based on Israel's population and what happened that day and
Speaker 2: the murder and the rape and the torture and the
Speaker 2: kidnapping and beheadings, and a lot of it's on videotape.
Speaker 1: I've seen a lot of it.
Speaker 2: The day after, there was a pro Palestinian rally in
Speaker 2: Times Square in New York.
Speaker 1: She was there.
Speaker 2: That's October eighth, twenty twenty three. If you look at
Speaker 2: Israel's population a little less than nine million, that would
Speaker 2: be the equivalent of forty thousand dead Americans.
Speaker 1: And today we've talked about that a lot.
Speaker 2: In early twenty six, when asked if she would condemn Tamas,
Speaker 2: whose charter calls for the destruction of Israel, she just says,
Speaker 2: you know that the question ignores seventy five years of occupation,
Speaker 2: et cetera, et cetera. So I mean she is as
Speaker 2: radical a leftist as you can imagine.
Speaker 1: What is the terms.
Speaker 4: The United States of America wave Field the Palestinian blood
Speaker 4: really stages.
Speaker 1: Solitarity with Palestina. We have the historic.
Speaker 2: Responsibility of defeeting, of defeating Israel colonialist out.
Speaker 1: And simperialism.
Speaker 2: So she wants that. And this is the day after
Speaker 2: October seventh. She's a woman that said, as I mentioned,
Speaker 2: no police at all. Ever, when you have a city
Speaker 2: of ten million people and you have no police, how
Speaker 2: could you possibly expect anything other than chaos and mayhem?
Speaker 2: She takes it a step further. She has advocated for
Speaker 2: the complete abolition of ice prison. She wants all prisons
Speaker 2: to be closed. She wants all police to be abolished.
Speaker 2: She wants all borders to be abolished.
Speaker 1: This is now.
Speaker 2: Remember we've been talking about the Party of Platner, the
Speaker 2: Party of Elsayed, the Party of six gender tell Rico,
Speaker 2: we've been talking about the Party of Bernie Sanders and
Speaker 2: Pocahontas and Mom Donni and AOC and the squad. And
Speaker 2: then we've been talking about the other part of the equation,
Speaker 2: which is, you know, but for one Democratic senator by
Speaker 2: the name of John Fetterman, no Democrat has been willing
Speaker 2: to take them on. This a woman that explicitly opposes
Speaker 2: any form of deportation. Never mind the fact that we
Speaker 2: have laws and borders and sovereignty. She doesn't believe in
Speaker 2: any deportation, no punishment for crime. In twenty twenty two,
Speaker 2: she tweeted that the US was involved in Ukraine because
Speaker 2: the Cold War ended, and we've been bullying Russia ever since.
Speaker 2: The aggressor in that war was Russia. She in an
Speaker 2: interview agreed with a suggestion that if billionaires threatened to
Speaker 2: leave New York, they should go ahead and leave, which,
Speaker 2: by the way, is happening in droves. She has agreed
Speaker 2: with the suggestion on that issue, but in twenty twenty
Speaker 2: she actually doesn't even like members of her own party,
Speaker 2: which is a little odd to me. She publicly referred
Speaker 2: to Joe Biden as a rapist during the primary season.
Speaker 2: When Kamala Harris gave her now viral speech in twenty
Speaker 2: one saying that her message to Guatemalan immigrants was do
Speaker 2: not come, she reposted the video with an f Kamala
Speaker 2: Harris note that was very nice of her, Linda, don't
Speaker 2: you think very very thoughtful?
Speaker 1: She seems like a sweet gal. Super sweet.
Speaker 2: Post social past social media post surfaced showing comments where
Speaker 2: she disparaged interracial relationships with white people, referred to COVID
Speaker 2: nineteen as the pandemic as a European plague. Why did
Speaker 2: I think all this time that it originated in Wuhan
Speaker 2: in a lab that was likely, you know, funded by
Speaker 2: the Eco Health Alliance that got money from Fauci's NIH.
Speaker 1: Why don't I believe that the whole time?
Speaker 2: She maintains that all deportations are fundamentally wrong. She supports
Speaker 2: the entire Grip New Deal, which is womb to tomb,
Speaker 2: cradle to grave. She supports one hundred percent fossil fuel
Speaker 2: free economy. She wants immigrants with temporary protected status to
Speaker 2: become citizens. She supports tuition free community college, Medicare for all.
Speaker 2: She is a longtime activist and apparently was an alumni
Speaker 2: organizer for Columbia Universities quote Gaza saladarity back in the day.
Speaker 2: And she's only one of the three that got elected. Now,
Speaker 2: the big question all of you have to ask yourself
Speaker 2: is how many Democrats have dared to speak out against
Speaker 2: Platner or El Sayed? Who's campaigning with Hassan Piker or
Speaker 2: six gender?
Speaker 1: Tell a Rico? Or God is non binary? Tell Rico?
Speaker 2: Or you know a vegan campaign in the great state
Speaker 2: of Texas, Texas?
Speaker 1: Tell Rico?
Speaker 2: You know the the real shift here? And what makes
Speaker 2: this I think the most fascinating political moment, midterm election
Speaker 2: moment is all past precedent goes out the window. Historically,
Speaker 2: the party in power will lose seats. There are exceptions
Speaker 2: in the House and in the Senate. That's historically. But
Speaker 2: I'm arguing that all bets are off. I'm arguing there's
Speaker 2: nobody that you can talk to today that's going to give
Speaker 2: you an accurate analysis of how this is going to
Speaker 2: play out. Now, I'll even take it a step further.
Speaker 2: I'm not even sure that the events that will define
Speaker 2: the outcome of the midterm election this year, I'm not
Speaker 2: even sure those events have happened yet. One of the
Speaker 2: other winners is a woman by the name of Claire Valdez,
Speaker 2: a former union organizer, state assembly woman in New York
Speaker 2: on a competitive race and another Democratic Socialist priority. Top
Speaker 2: priority is getting every American worker into a union. She too,
Speaker 2: wants to abolish ice. She wants a complete moratorium on
Speaker 2: new AI data centers due to environmental concerns and job
Speaker 2: displacement risk. She is, by the way, Linda, you would
Speaker 2: love this. How many hours do you think you work
Speaker 2: a week on the show?
Speaker 1: A lot, way more than she's ever worked in her life.
Speaker 2: How many articles did I send you between last night
Speaker 2: and tonight and today, thank God, advocates for a federally
Speaker 2: mandated thirty two hour work week. Who works thirty two hours?
Speaker 2: I don't know a single person that's successful. They can
Speaker 2: work thirty two hours and get away with it. And
Speaker 2: where are they going to get the money to pay
Speaker 2: their mortgage, their rent, their insurance. You know a few,
Speaker 2: you know, extras for their kids, et cetera. I mean,
Speaker 2: life's expensive. Her housing platform includes a push for federal
Speaker 2: universe versal rent control. You know what universal rent control is? Basically,
Speaker 2: you empower elected officials to steal money from landlords that
Speaker 2: paid full price for an apartment or a house or
Speaker 2: whatever they're renting, and then force them to give a
Speaker 2: discount to a stranger. And even if it means they
Speaker 2: lose money, they don't care because you're one of those
Speaker 2: evil capitalists. She has called for a cancelation of Puerto
Speaker 2: Rico's debt. She wants to nationalize the airline industry. Get this,
Speaker 2: abolish tsa pre check.
Speaker 1: My hot take is we need to abolish pre check.
Speaker 2: I've got like a million beefs with the airline industry
Speaker 2: and the process of having to fly.
Speaker 1: We need to like nationalize the airline industry.
Speaker 5: But let's stuck my abolishing pre check.
Speaker 1: Okay.
Speaker 2: I don't want to get on a plane where you're
Speaker 2: not check Linda, even though you get wanded a little more.
Speaker 1: Trust me frequent they're gonna check me. They always check me.
Speaker 2: Exactly You and sweet baby James, then you guy that's
Speaker 2: got this guy, Brad Lander.
Speaker 1: I mean, what happened to this guy, Dan Goldman.
Speaker 2: I thought was horrible when he went to that coffee
Speaker 2: shop and they put up that horrible, you know, tweet
Speaker 2: against this guy. Anyway, he is a progressive, and apparently
Speaker 2: he's a little bit more moderate in that he supports
Speaker 2: Akeem Jeffries. Now, Hakeem Jeffries will not speak out against
Speaker 2: any of these people. Chuck Schumer will speak out against
Speaker 2: none of these people. And they probably think their silence
Speaker 2: will buy them some goodwill among these radicals.
Speaker 1: I don't think it's by buying them any.
Speaker 2: Goodwill, because I think all of these radicals are gonna
Speaker 2: say time for Schumer to go. He's leader in name only,
Speaker 2: minority leader in name only, in the same with Hakeem Jeffries.
Speaker 2: He's fighting for a fifteen dollars minimum wage.
Speaker 1: It is, it's the same thing.
Speaker 2: He wants to expand the Supreme Court to thirteen members,
Speaker 2: medicare for all, supports a wealth tax, wants to raise
Speaker 2: the capital gains tax, wants to abolish ice, and extends
Speaker 2: solidarity to Gaza. I mean, this is now your Democratic Party.
Speaker 2: I have been saying, and I stand by this. We
Speaker 2: are in uncharted waters for a midterm election year. We've
Speaker 2: never been in this position before. Now I go to
Speaker 2: my admonition to you. I've been saying it for some time,
Speaker 2: and that is really simple. You only have to do
Speaker 2: one thing this year, as far as I'm concerned, and
Speaker 2: just commit in your mind, heart and soul that you
Speaker 2: are going to vote and prevent these people from ever
Speaker 2: taking power, because if you don't, this is the country
Speaker 2: that you will hand off to your kids and grandkids.
Speaker 2: All right, So let me get back to this whole idea,
Speaker 2: because this is like a full I mean, we're now
Speaker 2: getting close to the fourth of July. By the end
Speaker 2: of this week, it's going to be the fourth of July.
Speaker 2: What's today's date, Linda, It's the June.
Speaker 1: What today is the twenty ninth? Okay, today's the twenty ninth.
Speaker 2: So we're getting very close to July, August, September. In September,
Speaker 2: what happens Labor Day? What happens after Labor Day? People's
Speaker 2: attention start getting drawn into elections again. The only thing
Speaker 2: I'm going to ask all of you in this audience
Speaker 2: is one thing is just committing your mind, heart, soul
Speaker 2: that you are not going to let this radicalized party
Speaker 2: take over our country and we'll have nothing but never
Speaker 2: ending investigation, impeachment, you know, NonStop pushes for new Green dealism, socialism,
Speaker 2: climate alarmism. It will be a disaster because now the
Speaker 2: Democratic Socialists, communists, they pretty much run the Democratic Party.
Speaker 2: There was a political piece out today that they are
Speaker 2: now planning to even take down the most powerful Democrat
Speaker 2: in Washington, I would argue formally most powerful, and that's
Speaker 2: Chuck Schumer. I mean, we learned a lot about Chuck
Speaker 2: Schumer when it came to Mom Donnie. Did he endorse
Speaker 2: Mom Donnie know? Did he speak out against them which
Speaker 2: is even worse? No, did he speak out against his
Speaker 2: wife and posts that she liked post October seventh, twenty
Speaker 2: twenty three. No, has Chuck Schumer ever taken on the
Speaker 2: squad or Graham Platner or El Sayed or tell Rico.
Speaker 2: No did he stand up against any of these people
Speaker 2: that were elected in his home.
Speaker 1: State of New York.
Speaker 2: No will he ever know, which is why, according to Politico,
Speaker 2: he thinks this is his way to stay in power
Speaker 2: as the Democratic Minority leader, you know, with his plan like,
Speaker 2: for example, going when he was asked about Graham Plattner,
Speaker 2: we will defeat Susan Collins and take control of the Senate,
Speaker 2: he said the same thing five times because he doesn't
Speaker 2: have the courage to even go after a guy with
Speaker 2: a Nazi tattoo that has attacked women that are victims
Speaker 2: of sexual assault, on top of every other insane thing
Speaker 2: that he has said. So anyway, what's interesting to watch
Speaker 2: are people like him again leader in name only, because
Speaker 2: he doesn't dare take on the real the real leaders
Speaker 2: of the Democratic Party, the real leaders of the Democratic Party.
Speaker 2: The person that's winning the most in terms of endorsements
Speaker 2: for Democrats is Bernie Sanders. The next person that's winning
Speaker 2: the most is AOC. The next person that's winning the
Speaker 2: most is Pocahontas. And I don't see Chuck Schumer ever
Speaker 2: being willing able, capable of taking on any of them.
Speaker 2: So he sits by quietly. His party becomes more radicalized.
Speaker 2: He is scared to death that AOC might challenge him
Speaker 2: for his Senate seat. If she does, it will be
Speaker 2: a massacre. She would absolutely destroy him in the state
Speaker 2: of New York. So political has this piece today that
Speaker 2: in New York, you know, it's like a five alarm fire.
Speaker 2: They describe it for Chuck Schumer, and they said the
Speaker 2: relentless march, which saw a trio of insurgents toppling establishment
Speaker 2: back Democrats Tuesday, is now shifting to the even bigger
Speaker 2: prize of ousting him. He's seventy five years old, he's
Speaker 2: out of touch, he has no control over his party.
Speaker 2: It goes on to say Schumer has long been considered
Speaker 2: vulnerable to a left flank challenge. His stalwart support, which
Speaker 2: by the way, has not been recent, this is years ago.
Speaker 2: For Israel, has created additional leftlank expo and criticism. And
Speaker 2: it goes on to say the rapidly shifting political dynamic
Speaker 2: is now morphing into a crisis for the entire democratic establishment.
Speaker 2: Now the establishment, and no one's more establishment than Chuck.
Speaker 2: You know, it should be a wake up call if
Speaker 2: Chuck had any moral compass, or moral clarity, or moral strength,
Speaker 2: he would put aside his desire for power, and he
Speaker 2: would try to write the ship and lead his party
Speaker 2: to more reasonable points of view.
Speaker 1: And I'll give you an example.
Speaker 2: If I'm Chuck Schumer right now, I'm quaking in I'm
Speaker 2: scared to death, said one Democratic strategist, former advisor to
Speaker 2: Governor Kathy Hokel. You know why is Kathy Hokel so
Speaker 2: beholden to Mamdani because she needs Mumdani's support if she
Speaker 2: wants to get re elected. Although in New York I
Speaker 2: worry about the math. It's just a big problem. Jeffries
Speaker 2: now has his Hakeem Jefferies again. Both minority leaders are
Speaker 2: from New York, and he thinks it exposes the Democratic divide.
Speaker 2: Although one of the people support him, Landers supports him.
Speaker 2: Let's put it this way. When Van Jones takes this stand,
Speaker 2: is what he said. This was quoted in the New
Speaker 2: York Post. He hit the panic button and warrened quote.
Speaker 2: The roof is collapsing on the Democratic Party.
Speaker 1: This is a.
Speaker 3: New establishment Schumer and a Kim Jeffreys. Is a battle
Speaker 3: between the establishment and this insurgency and the roof is
Speaker 3: collapsing on the Democratic Party establishment tonight. If Mom, Donnie
Speaker 3: gets a hat trick three out of three, this is
Speaker 3: a new era for the Democratic Party. And you can't
Speaker 3: write off New York City because this is the place
Speaker 3: where both it's a power center for the establishment and
Speaker 3: the insurgency. And they're going ahead to head tonight. And
Speaker 3: right now this is not known longer a movement. This
Speaker 3: is a movement and a machine at the same time.
Speaker 3: And there's just no way to sugarcoat this. If Donnie
Speaker 3: pulls off the hat trick, is a new era and
Speaker 3: Democratic Party politics.
Speaker 1: All right.
Speaker 2: So he was right, Mam, Donnie pulled off the hat trick,
Speaker 2: and he's hitting the panic button that the roof is
Speaker 2: collapsing on the Democratic Party now, the Democratic Socialists are
Speaker 2: now planning, as I said to Toppel Schumer. And you know,
Speaker 2: if you look at other indicators, there's for example, we've
Speaker 2: cited other polls before this one where America is pride
Speaker 2: in our great country, the greatest country. I think God
Speaker 2: gave man among Democrats. I mean, these are record low numbers.
Speaker 2: So it's sort of like the base of the Democratic
Speaker 2: Party has been radicalized. What is that going to mean
Speaker 2: for Democrats that maybe live in Wisconsin or Pennsylvania or
Speaker 2: Georgia or North Carolina or Michigan, UH or Nevada or Arizona.
Speaker 2: I think it's gonna mean they're gonna leave the Democratic Party.
Speaker 2: They're not gonna want to be a part of a
Speaker 2: party of AOC and be a part of a party
Speaker 2: of Mom Donnie and Bernie Sanders and Pocahontas and AOC
Speaker 2: and the Squad and a party that is even adopting
Speaker 2: virulent anti semitism in some in some corners. Joe Biden,
Speaker 2: by the way, appeared over the weekend. He got heckled
Speaker 2: at a Democratic Party gala and he appeared confused, confused
Speaker 2: which way to exit, as usual. So we're gonna watch
Speaker 2: this AOC as now she's out there going full on
Speaker 2: socialists call him for the breakup of big tech companies
Speaker 2: like Apple.
Speaker 1: Why would you break up Apple? I like Apple.
Speaker 2: Apple doesn't get rich because anybody's forced to buy an
Speaker 2: Apple product. Most people have an Apple phone because they
Speaker 2: want an Apple phone anyway, So she's putting them on
Speaker 2: I mean, this is just the beginning of the government
Speaker 2: takeover of industry. This is what they would do, and
Speaker 2: this is where they stand now as a party. So
Speaker 2: they've got they've got a major hardcore radical democratic. It's
Speaker 2: not just the democratic socialism of America.
Speaker 1: It is.
Speaker 2: It is full on, you know, statism, communism, redistributionism, across
Speaker 2: the board, and it's not good for them. Now, let
Speaker 2: me play a couple of other examples. Now, when a
Speaker 2: guy like Chris Murphy, Chris Murphy definitely hardcore liberal Democrat.
Speaker 2: But why would Senator Chris Murphy of Connecticut. Connecticut is
Speaker 2: not exactly New York, but it's pretty pretty reliably left.
Speaker 2: You might recall that Joe Lieberman, formerly vice presidential candidate
Speaker 2: with Al Gore law his primary that was kind of
Speaker 2: like the canary in the coal mine then and then
Speaker 2: came back and won the general election, and he won
Speaker 2: as an independent. Here's Chris Murphy, now again, this is
Speaker 2: supposed to be a mainstream Senate Democrat, and listen to
Speaker 2: him welcoming all of these radicals and applauding them for
Speaker 2: what they're doing.
Speaker 5: Listen, I want us to be a big ten party.
Speaker 5: I mean, I've been saying this for years. I think
Speaker 5: that it's actually a sign of a party that is
Speaker 5: alive and growing when there's a contest of ideas inside
Speaker 5: the party. So I'm not a Democratic socialist, but I
Speaker 5: do believe that the Democratic Party has been historically way
Speaker 5: too timid in taking on corporate power. I think our
Speaker 5: party should have bigger ideas. I put one on the
Speaker 5: table last week, a twenty five dollar minimum wage. And
Speaker 5: I think we do have to have answers for the
Speaker 5: way in which corporations and billionaires are taking over and
Speaker 5: corrupting our politics. So I do think that there is
Speaker 5: somewhat of a trend that candidates who are confronting concentrated
Speaker 5: corporate power in a meaningful way are winning, and I
Speaker 5: think that that is something that the Democratic Party should
Speaker 5: pay attention to.
Speaker 2: Now, what a is states like California, New York, Washington
Speaker 2: State all have in common. I mean, mom, Donnie did
Speaker 2: that video about Ken Griffin. Ken Griffin's left New York
Speaker 2: and he's taken with him six billion dollars he had
Speaker 2: planned on investing in New York City. He's taken it
Speaker 2: all with him. And by the way, thank god, he's
Speaker 2: moving that money to my free state of Florida, which
Speaker 2: makes me happy because my fellow Floridians will get high
Speaker 2: paying career jobs, and it will be nothing but a
Speaker 2: boom to the economy in South Florida, which has been happening,
Speaker 2: you know, more and more on a daily basis. More
Speaker 2: people from California now seem to be moved moving to
Speaker 2: Texas and Florida than ever before, which we've not seen.
Speaker 2: When James Carville, again who's been losing his mind of late,
Speaker 2: sees these results and loses it, I think this is
Speaker 2: a very telling moment because he himself kind of seemed
Speaker 2: to have fallen into the idea that they're going to
Speaker 2: embrace this radical wing of their party. Here's what he
Speaker 2: said this weekend.
Speaker 4: I don't think that the Congressional Democrat should see Hi
Speaker 4: as a member of the Democratic Party. She actually describes
Speaker 4: herself as a Democratic socialist. I don't have anything in
Speaker 4: common with someone that says that they're against interracial dating
Speaker 4: or doesn't want to have any incarceration for convicted felons.
Speaker 4: That's just not who I think the Democratic Party is
Speaker 4: and be able to let her be a Democratic socialist,
Speaker 4: but I don't think they should. You know, you can't
Speaker 4: kick out of Congress. She was voted, but she doesn't
Speaker 4: have to be in a Democratic caucus. To this extent
Speaker 4: of this one instance, I think the Democrats need to
Speaker 4: stand up and say, this is not who we are.
Speaker 4: We do not determine who you can date or not date.
Speaker 4: That is your own business. I don't need to date
Speaker 4: whoever you want. And when you start telling people they
Speaker 4: can't date somebody of a different race or a different gender,
Speaker 4: out of whatever the hell it is, it's not my business.
Speaker 1: Has never been any of my business, it's certainly not now.
Speaker 4: I just think that that's not why most people are Democrats.
Speaker 4: We Democrats because we don't hate anybody.
Speaker 2: So there would be three Democrats that I would listen to.
Speaker 2: One is Carville, even though I think lately he's kind
Speaker 2: of jumped the shark and he's been a little crazy.
Speaker 2: But when Van Jones is saying it, when David Axelrod
Speaker 2: is saying it, We've had on the program we had
Speaker 2: on TV, Mark Penn, when Mark Penn is saying it,
Speaker 2: when Doug shown on this radio program last week said it,
Speaker 2: and all of these former mainstream, you know, Democrats that
Speaker 2: have been around the block and been part of many
Speaker 2: election cycles, and they see the damage and the danger
Speaker 2: that their party is now facing in terms of an
Speaker 2: identity crisis. You know that what I'm telling you is true,
Speaker 2: and that is that all bets are off here. It's
Speaker 2: the most unpredictable midterm election year ever. I mean, it's
Speaker 2: all up for grabs. And I think that the more
Speaker 2: the American people become aware a that these people now
Speaker 2: are now dominating the Democratic Party, and b no mainstream
Speaker 2: Democrat dares to correct them or challenge them, or battle
Speaker 2: them or fight them. I think that's even worse than
Speaker 2: the people that take these crazy positions, because it never
Speaker 2: used to be that way. Somebody would stand up and say, Okay,
Speaker 2: that's really stupid. You're going to cost us the election.
Speaker 2: Probably a good time for you to shut up, and
Speaker 2: you know, go hide in a hole somewhere.