WEBVTT - Beating The Book: 2020 NFL MegaPod Week 10 Preview

0:00:03.440 --> 0:00:13.920
<v Speaker 1>Check it down, man, No down many check it down now.

0:00:14.440 --> 0:00:18.000
<v Speaker 1>Thursday morning, November twelve, it's the Beating the Book podcast

0:00:18.320 --> 0:00:23.760
<v Speaker 1>Megapod for week number ten Wow Week ten National Football League.

0:00:24.160 --> 0:00:26.319
<v Speaker 1>It's Gill Alexander, thanks for joining us, said of course

0:00:26.360 --> 0:00:30.800
<v Speaker 1>alongside Todd wished nevuh no longer from his mother's cork attic.

0:00:30.880 --> 0:00:33.760
<v Speaker 1>What room is that, Todd, it's the same room. It's

0:00:33.800 --> 0:00:36.320
<v Speaker 1>just I did a background to trick you today. See

0:00:36.320 --> 0:00:37.519
<v Speaker 1>he doesn't want he doesn't want me to say the

0:00:37.520 --> 0:00:40.839
<v Speaker 1>cork Attic park. And of course, uh the conciliary to

0:00:40.960 --> 0:00:43.639
<v Speaker 1>Derrick Stephens, the VP of Operations, one of the vps

0:00:44.159 --> 0:00:47.960
<v Speaker 1>here at the Circus Sports, the Great Mike Palm. Hello Michael,

0:00:48.120 --> 0:00:50.640
<v Speaker 1>the morning Gil. You know today is a significant day

0:00:50.640 --> 0:00:54.160
<v Speaker 1>for the Megapod. People ask me what is humanity all about?

0:00:54.160 --> 0:00:56.360
<v Speaker 1>What is this life all about? What's the theme of it?

0:00:56.400 --> 0:01:01.080
<v Speaker 1>And I always tell them it's about sin and redemption. Well, today,

0:01:01.360 --> 0:01:04.200
<v Speaker 1>the other member of our little mini sen Hedron, we'll

0:01:04.200 --> 0:01:06.800
<v Speaker 1>have a chance to maybe get some redemption or at

0:01:06.880 --> 0:01:11.160
<v Speaker 1>least apologize. Four. Well, I don't want to give away

0:01:11.160 --> 0:01:15.360
<v Speaker 1>who the guest is. Oh, that's right, I forgot. You're

0:01:15.360 --> 0:01:19.360
<v Speaker 1>referring to the incident. It's Todd Seminel moment on the megapod.

0:01:19.440 --> 0:01:21.520
<v Speaker 1>So far, ladies and gentlemen back on the show for

0:01:21.560 --> 0:01:23.120
<v Speaker 1>the first time. I hadn't I hadn't had him on

0:01:23.160 --> 0:01:24.800
<v Speaker 1>a numbers game in a while too. And it's all

0:01:24.880 --> 0:01:28.000
<v Speaker 1>my mistake. It's my old friend Dr Bob stole from

0:01:28.080 --> 0:01:31.240
<v Speaker 1>Dr Bob Sports at d r Bob Sports on Twitter. Bob,

0:01:31.480 --> 0:01:33.319
<v Speaker 1>how are you doing for the second time today? Man

0:01:34.760 --> 0:01:37.880
<v Speaker 1>entire of talking to you, Gil he no, do you

0:01:37.920 --> 0:01:40.160
<v Speaker 1>are you aware of the incident we're referring to from

0:01:40.240 --> 0:01:44.039
<v Speaker 1>last year? I have no idea. Well, it's a matter

0:01:44.120 --> 0:01:48.600
<v Speaker 1>if much debate, wasn't it Mikey trying to remember? Yeah,

0:01:48.800 --> 0:01:51.720
<v Speaker 1>some people thought, uh, someone here was being impolite to

0:01:51.760 --> 0:01:55.400
<v Speaker 1>you and you you immediately said he wasn't being polite. Yeah,

0:01:55.800 --> 0:01:59.160
<v Speaker 1>you were just being nice. It was what we call propaganda.

0:01:59.320 --> 0:02:01.800
<v Speaker 1>My good friend Mikey, being from Iowa, is someone who

0:02:01.800 --> 0:02:05.000
<v Speaker 1>likes to, you know, indulge in a little propaganda and

0:02:05.080 --> 0:02:07.760
<v Speaker 1>get his sick of fans to go along with him.

0:02:07.840 --> 0:02:14.240
<v Speaker 1>So we created an entire narrative that was completely completely nonsense,

0:02:14.639 --> 0:02:18.320
<v Speaker 1>and Dr Bob put a stop to the nonsense, because

0:02:18.400 --> 0:02:21.160
<v Speaker 1>Dr Bob is a man of substance, not like certain

0:02:21.200 --> 0:02:25.280
<v Speaker 1>people who eat popcorn and drink wine at the south Point. Enough,

0:02:25.560 --> 0:02:28.359
<v Speaker 1>there it is. I don't say a word and he

0:02:28.400 --> 0:02:31.280
<v Speaker 1>comes right after. Um. Let me just can I say this?

0:02:31.280 --> 0:02:33.480
<v Speaker 1>Because we're the Master's first round is going on as

0:02:33.480 --> 0:02:36.360
<v Speaker 1>we're recording this, Eldrick Tiger Woods is two shots back.

0:02:36.560 --> 0:02:39.960
<v Speaker 1>If Tiger Woods wins circu closes on Monday, it's over

0:02:40.120 --> 0:02:43.640
<v Speaker 1>fifty three to while we could kill for the Tiger

0:02:43.680 --> 0:02:50.000
<v Speaker 1>Blue Jay afternoon mattenee. We got, we got, we got,

0:02:50.280 --> 0:02:52.680
<v Speaker 1>we got, we got the os at the Rangers and

0:02:52.720 --> 0:02:56.280
<v Speaker 1>then we got three thousand people coming for it. And

0:02:56.320 --> 0:02:58.840
<v Speaker 1>Bryson to Shambo, by the way, is even par through

0:02:58.919 --> 0:03:02.280
<v Speaker 1>ten and he's been in the Woods the entire round.

0:03:02.720 --> 0:03:05.120
<v Speaker 1>So the fact that he's even and only five shots

0:03:05.120 --> 0:03:06.959
<v Speaker 1>back to me is still also the story of the round.

0:03:06.960 --> 0:03:10.280
<v Speaker 1>But anyway, football week number ten, Mike, Before we get

0:03:10.320 --> 0:03:13.080
<v Speaker 1>to our format with the three best bets, the teasers,

0:03:13.320 --> 0:03:17.959
<v Speaker 1>the survivor and all that, michigas um three ten left

0:03:17.960 --> 0:03:23.840
<v Speaker 1>and survivor. The inaugural survivor contested circuits started with somehow

0:03:24.480 --> 0:03:28.440
<v Speaker 1>three survived This week. I was on the Steelers. That

0:03:28.600 --> 0:03:30.920
<v Speaker 1>was just by the skin of my teeth that everybody

0:03:30.919 --> 0:03:33.000
<v Speaker 1>else who had the Steelers. And then, oh my god,

0:03:33.320 --> 0:03:39.600
<v Speaker 1>the Patriots very resilient entrance. It's incredible. You know, if

0:03:39.640 --> 0:03:41.640
<v Speaker 1>Anthony Lynn could coach it, all would probably be over

0:03:41.640 --> 0:03:43.680
<v Speaker 1>at this point. He had a chance to knock out

0:03:43.720 --> 0:03:45.240
<v Speaker 1>the Chiefs in week two, he had a chance to

0:03:45.280 --> 0:03:48.280
<v Speaker 1>knock out the Buccaneers. People that have a chance to

0:03:48.360 --> 0:03:50.200
<v Speaker 1>knock out the Saints. I mean all those games that

0:03:50.240 --> 0:03:52.520
<v Speaker 1>he blew those big leads in. But so we set

0:03:52.560 --> 0:03:54.920
<v Speaker 1>with three ten. We still had another week where an

0:03:55.000 --> 0:03:58.240
<v Speaker 1>entry wasn't placed. So all nine weeks so far, somebody

0:03:58.240 --> 0:04:00.200
<v Speaker 1>hasn't turned in. How about they're the guy that went

0:04:00.280 --> 0:04:03.040
<v Speaker 1>eight no, and you're one of the three thirty or

0:04:03.040 --> 0:04:05.440
<v Speaker 1>whatever left and you don't put the enter. I s incredible.

0:04:05.560 --> 0:04:09.160
<v Speaker 1>But here's the question. This week, two seventy of the

0:04:09.240 --> 0:04:11.920
<v Speaker 1>three ten have green Bay left. How many people will

0:04:12.000 --> 0:04:13.600
<v Speaker 1>choose green Bay this week? I asked that on a

0:04:13.680 --> 0:04:18.719
<v Speaker 1>numbers game this morning and Jason said two thirds. And

0:04:18.760 --> 0:04:20.839
<v Speaker 1>I said, if it's two thirds, it's an upset. I

0:04:20.839 --> 0:04:24.480
<v Speaker 1>think it's more than that. Yeah, really, well, how many

0:04:24.480 --> 0:04:26.880
<v Speaker 1>people know how to play game? Theory or how many

0:04:26.920 --> 0:04:29.200
<v Speaker 1>people take the game literally and just want to survive.

0:04:30.960 --> 0:04:32.280
<v Speaker 1>And that's not to say I'm not going to play

0:04:32.360 --> 0:04:34.119
<v Speaker 1>green Bay, because I might end up with green Bay.

0:04:34.200 --> 0:04:36.040
<v Speaker 1>So maybe I'm playing it wrong too. But if you're

0:04:36.040 --> 0:04:38.120
<v Speaker 1>playing it right, and if you're playing it to win,

0:04:38.480 --> 0:04:41.080
<v Speaker 1>you probably don't take green Bay. You take somebody else

0:04:41.279 --> 0:04:45.240
<v Speaker 1>and hope for a calamity. It's an interesting week because

0:04:45.240 --> 0:04:48.520
<v Speaker 1>you're just you're just ten days away from Thanksgiving, which

0:04:48.560 --> 0:04:53.800
<v Speaker 1>will really be the the seminal moment of So that's

0:04:53.800 --> 0:04:56.000
<v Speaker 1>the thing about Circuit Survivor. Last thing on this Thanksgiving

0:04:56.040 --> 0:04:57.880
<v Speaker 1>is the cork. It's the eighteenth week. It's a week

0:04:57.920 --> 0:04:59.760
<v Speaker 1>on an in and of itself, and it's Detroit, Houston,

0:04:59.760 --> 0:05:03.400
<v Speaker 1>It's Washington, Dallas, it's Pittsburgh, Baltimore. Man, it's a prayer

0:05:03.440 --> 0:05:06.480
<v Speaker 1>for everybody. A lot of people have already used Pittsburgh

0:05:06.480 --> 0:05:10.080
<v Speaker 1>and Baltimore. Have you considered that Pittsburgh Of those other

0:05:10.160 --> 0:05:13.160
<v Speaker 1>four teams, who would you select? There's no obvious choice

0:05:13.240 --> 0:05:16.080
<v Speaker 1>unless there's some injury news or COVID news or something

0:05:16.120 --> 0:05:18.240
<v Speaker 1>comes out. Who's gonna play quarterback for either Dallas or

0:05:18.279 --> 0:05:21.040
<v Speaker 1>washing No idea, And can you trust Detroit or Houston.

0:05:21.960 --> 0:05:24.040
<v Speaker 1>Can you Yeah, it's it's a prayer that day. I

0:05:24.080 --> 0:05:26.280
<v Speaker 1>do want to mention this, yes, because this was brought

0:05:26.360 --> 0:05:28.640
<v Speaker 1>up on one of the other shows on the Visa

0:05:28.720 --> 0:05:36.000
<v Speaker 1>Network for Survivor Thanksgiving, there's there's one before you. What

0:05:36.160 --> 0:05:37.840
<v Speaker 1>is the deadline to get to pick in? We all

0:05:37.839 --> 0:05:39.839
<v Speaker 1>know what's Saturday. I was gonna ask you this. It's

0:05:40.440 --> 0:05:43.280
<v Speaker 1>Wednesday night at ten pm Pacific, So I want all

0:05:43.279 --> 0:05:44.920
<v Speaker 1>of our listeners out there to know that that are

0:05:44.920 --> 0:05:48.839
<v Speaker 1>still in Pacific. So one am Eastern Thursday morning. Okay,

0:05:49.080 --> 0:05:51.440
<v Speaker 1>that's that's a good question. That's a good answer to know. Alright,

0:05:51.680 --> 0:05:54.520
<v Speaker 1>let's start with our best bets for a week number

0:05:54.560 --> 0:05:57.039
<v Speaker 1>ten in the NFL BOB we usually start with a

0:05:57.080 --> 0:05:59.680
<v Speaker 1>Thursday night game. Actually, that's the way this works. Is

0:05:59.760 --> 0:06:02.000
<v Speaker 1>your do do you have any thoughts on Thursday night?

0:06:02.120 --> 0:06:03.839
<v Speaker 1>And if you do, is it one of your three

0:06:03.839 --> 0:06:07.280
<v Speaker 1>best bet? Sir? I do? And it is all right?

0:06:07.520 --> 0:06:12.080
<v Speaker 1>What is it? Fire away? All right? I like Indianapolis.

0:06:12.200 --> 0:06:14.640
<v Speaker 1>I released them to my clients earlier in the week

0:06:14.680 --> 0:06:16.240
<v Speaker 1>when it was plus one and a half. It's now

0:06:16.279 --> 0:06:21.040
<v Speaker 1>minus one. I still like Indianapolis. Um Tennessee, my models

0:06:21.040 --> 0:06:23.839
<v Speaker 1>had them overrated most of the season. The metrics aren't

0:06:23.839 --> 0:06:27.400
<v Speaker 1>particularly good. They've played the second third easiest schedule in

0:06:27.440 --> 0:06:30.919
<v Speaker 1>the league. They run the ball far too much to

0:06:31.000 --> 0:06:34.880
<v Speaker 1>be an efficient offense, and that works sometimes because Derrick

0:06:34.920 --> 0:06:37.080
<v Speaker 1>Henry can break off some big runs. And if you

0:06:37.120 --> 0:06:41.320
<v Speaker 1>have explosive running plays, that's that's that's pretty good from

0:06:41.360 --> 0:06:44.640
<v Speaker 1>an analytics standpoint. But if you do not have explosive

0:06:44.680 --> 0:06:46.760
<v Speaker 1>running plays, we were wasting your time running the ball

0:06:46.760 --> 0:06:49.000
<v Speaker 1>in the NFL, and the Colts do not give up

0:06:49.040 --> 0:06:51.719
<v Speaker 1>explosive running plays. So I think it's a good matchup

0:06:51.800 --> 0:06:55.560
<v Speaker 1>for the Colts in that sense. Also, Dorry Jackson is

0:06:55.600 --> 0:06:58.040
<v Speaker 1>not playing. He was activated, but he is not playing

0:06:58.080 --> 0:07:01.040
<v Speaker 1>for the Titans. Um so the Colts should That should

0:07:01.040 --> 0:07:04.560
<v Speaker 1>help the Colts out there. Darius Leonard is playing for

0:07:04.640 --> 0:07:06.800
<v Speaker 1>the Colts. He's missed two and a half games so far.

0:07:07.279 --> 0:07:09.440
<v Speaker 1>He practiced this week and he's ready to go. Uh.

0:07:09.480 --> 0:07:12.480
<v Speaker 1>They're They're top five defense, even though he's missed two

0:07:12.520 --> 0:07:14.200
<v Speaker 1>and a half games. He's one of their key players.

0:07:14.960 --> 0:07:17.480
<v Speaker 1>So I like the I just like the matchup here. Also,

0:07:18.560 --> 0:07:20.840
<v Speaker 1>Hannahill might struggle. They target tight ends a lot. The

0:07:20.840 --> 0:07:24.880
<v Speaker 1>Titans do second most in the league, and the Colts

0:07:24.960 --> 0:07:27.960
<v Speaker 1>only about five point two yards per target to tight ends.

0:07:28.040 --> 0:07:31.120
<v Speaker 1>In the meantime, Xavier Rose, one of the top corners

0:07:31.120 --> 0:07:34.040
<v Speaker 1>in the league in shadow A. J. Brown, And I

0:07:34.040 --> 0:07:37.800
<v Speaker 1>think the other Colts defensive backs can handle the rest

0:07:37.800 --> 0:07:40.680
<v Speaker 1>of the Titans receiver. So I like the matchup, and uh,

0:07:40.880 --> 0:07:44.119
<v Speaker 1>my math model favors favors the Colts here and Bob,

0:07:44.120 --> 0:07:45.920
<v Speaker 1>I buried the headline because I did it on the

0:07:46.000 --> 0:07:47.600
<v Speaker 1>radio side this morning, so I forgot to do it

0:07:47.600 --> 0:07:50.640
<v Speaker 1>again here. Your record this year thus far in the

0:07:50.800 --> 0:07:59.320
<v Speaker 1>NFL against the spread is uh thirty in is that right?

0:07:59.440 --> 0:08:01.480
<v Speaker 1>Thirty and third? He is fourteen and one the last

0:08:02.200 --> 0:08:06.200
<v Speaker 1>three weeks, and I was sixteen and twelve, thirty and thirteen,

0:08:06.600 --> 0:08:10.960
<v Speaker 1>thirty and thirteen. It ain't bethany Poris, but it's pretty

0:08:11.000 --> 0:08:14.600
<v Speaker 1>damn good. Thirty and thirteen is Bob said on on

0:08:15.240 --> 0:08:18.240
<v Speaker 1>the numbers game on Visa this morning. The sort of

0:08:18.240 --> 0:08:21.520
<v Speaker 1>coin flip games have by and large gone your way,

0:08:21.560 --> 0:08:23.640
<v Speaker 1>and that's how you get to thirty and thirteen. You're good,

0:08:23.960 --> 0:08:27.000
<v Speaker 1>but you're also getting good fortune. Two right, the last

0:08:27.000 --> 0:08:28.840
<v Speaker 1>two weeks has been all blowouts. You've been getting the

0:08:28.840 --> 0:08:31.480
<v Speaker 1>emails the last two weeks. We're nine and one, and

0:08:31.520 --> 0:08:34.920
<v Speaker 1>it's all all nine wins were easy. The week before that,

0:08:35.000 --> 0:08:36.920
<v Speaker 1>I was four and o or five and oh at

0:08:36.920 --> 0:08:40.200
<v Speaker 1>four O five and oh um, and I think three

0:08:40.200 --> 0:08:42.400
<v Speaker 1>of those were nail biers, you know, and I don't

0:08:42.440 --> 0:08:45.120
<v Speaker 1>want all three of them. In general, I've been winning

0:08:45.120 --> 0:08:47.199
<v Speaker 1>more close games than losing in the NFL. But I'd

0:08:47.240 --> 0:08:50.640
<v Speaker 1>still be hitting, you know, sixty three sixty four percent

0:08:50.679 --> 0:08:52.520
<v Speaker 1>if i'd split the toss up games. It's just been

0:08:52.559 --> 0:08:54.480
<v Speaker 1>a good year for the model. And I think we've

0:08:54.480 --> 0:08:58.400
<v Speaker 1>talked about it this morning. Um, you know, I think,

0:08:58.600 --> 0:09:00.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, adjusting for for all your injuries other than

0:09:00.960 --> 0:09:03.559
<v Speaker 1>just quarterbacks, mostly the market just to just for quarterbacks

0:09:03.559 --> 0:09:05.719
<v Speaker 1>and maybe a half point for McCaffrey or in the

0:09:05.800 --> 0:09:08.960
<v Speaker 1>leite wide receiver, but we just for every you know everything,

0:09:09.280 --> 0:09:13.520
<v Speaker 1>offensive lineman, edge rushers, cornerbacks. I mean, we had just

0:09:13.720 --> 0:09:16.240
<v Speaker 1>for every position, and I think that really gives it

0:09:16.280 --> 0:09:19.160
<v Speaker 1>gives us an edge. Yeah. I brought that up this

0:09:19.200 --> 0:09:21.480
<v Speaker 1>morning of all the things that I learned from you

0:09:21.520 --> 0:09:23.080
<v Speaker 1>over the years, Bob. And by the way, if I

0:09:23.120 --> 0:09:25.320
<v Speaker 1>may just say to you on this podcast, there was

0:09:25.440 --> 0:09:29.079
<v Speaker 1>no better person to work with to have a school

0:09:29.120 --> 0:09:31.520
<v Speaker 1>of handicapping than it was to work with you, and

0:09:31.600 --> 0:09:34.480
<v Speaker 1>that was I always thought that was your forte was

0:09:34.520 --> 0:09:36.760
<v Speaker 1>the ability, and this was more in a basketball contest

0:09:37.080 --> 0:09:40.720
<v Speaker 1>than football, to to properly assess the value of players

0:09:40.720 --> 0:09:42.439
<v Speaker 1>and in players out. I always thought that was your

0:09:42.440 --> 0:09:44.320
<v Speaker 1>best edge and stuff, and so that that's why I

0:09:44.320 --> 0:09:47.760
<v Speaker 1>asked that this morning. And uh, at least part of

0:09:47.800 --> 0:09:49.800
<v Speaker 1>your success this year based on that. That does not

0:09:49.880 --> 0:09:53.200
<v Speaker 1>surprise at all. Mikey, your first play no Thursday night,

0:09:53.200 --> 0:09:55.760
<v Speaker 1>Do you have any thoughts? My best bet is your

0:09:55.800 --> 0:09:59.440
<v Speaker 1>third best bet the under tonight under forty eight in

0:09:59.480 --> 0:10:04.480
<v Speaker 1>this game, and I agree so well, that's even better.

0:10:05.440 --> 0:10:08.440
<v Speaker 1>Thank you for being a man of such integrity. Ton

0:10:09.440 --> 0:10:12.160
<v Speaker 1>I agree with I agree with Bob's analysis and that

0:10:12.360 --> 0:10:14.839
<v Speaker 1>I think Tennessee is gonna have a hard time running

0:10:14.880 --> 0:10:18.760
<v Speaker 1>the football. And if Tennessee cannot run the football, Tannehill

0:10:18.840 --> 0:10:21.960
<v Speaker 1>is much less effective as a strictly dropped back passer.

0:10:22.040 --> 0:10:24.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean, his success is off the play action based

0:10:24.360 --> 0:10:28.400
<v Speaker 1>on Derrick's Henry's ability to run the football. UM at

0:10:28.400 --> 0:10:32.120
<v Speaker 1>this stage in his career. UM, I'm not the biggest

0:10:32.120 --> 0:10:36.000
<v Speaker 1>Philip Rivers fan, but I'm just I'm just not at

0:10:36.120 --> 0:10:38.839
<v Speaker 1>the light. But the key to defending Rivers really to

0:10:38.880 --> 0:10:41.480
<v Speaker 1>get him off his spot and to make him move around.

0:10:41.520 --> 0:10:43.760
<v Speaker 1>Tennessee hasn't had much of a pass rush. I think

0:10:43.840 --> 0:10:46.160
<v Speaker 1>Rivers will be able to control the ball and control

0:10:46.240 --> 0:10:48.960
<v Speaker 1>the clock tonight. And I have a hard time seeing

0:10:49.000 --> 0:10:51.160
<v Speaker 1>this game getting to forty nine or fifty. I think

0:10:51.200 --> 0:10:53.520
<v Speaker 1>I think this I like Bob's playing there. I think

0:10:53.559 --> 0:10:56.240
<v Speaker 1>this is a I think this is seventeen type of

0:10:56.240 --> 0:10:58.240
<v Speaker 1>a game, and I would lean Colts, but I like

0:10:58.280 --> 0:11:00.000
<v Speaker 1>the under Moore and so that'll be my third best

0:11:00.080 --> 0:11:02.760
<v Speaker 1>bet and a lot of Derek. Maybe the maybe the

0:11:02.800 --> 0:11:05.880
<v Speaker 1>team total Tennessee team total under then would be our

0:11:06.440 --> 0:11:11.240
<v Speaker 1>our combined play. Yeah, absolutely makes sense. Yeah, Todd, any

0:11:11.280 --> 0:11:13.880
<v Speaker 1>thoughts on Thursday night? Two things? First of all, did

0:11:13.880 --> 0:11:15.680
<v Speaker 1>you want me to update the records or no? Yeah,

0:11:15.720 --> 0:11:17.720
<v Speaker 1>please update the records. I'm so sorry. It's like I've

0:11:17.760 --> 0:11:22.000
<v Speaker 1>never been here before. Okay, the records are really improving.

0:11:22.040 --> 0:11:24.800
<v Speaker 1>Gills up to fourteen twelve and one after another nice week.

0:11:25.120 --> 0:11:28.240
<v Speaker 1>Mikey up to fifteen eleven and one after another nice week,

0:11:28.480 --> 0:11:29.880
<v Speaker 1>And I had a pretty good week. Two and I'm

0:11:29.920 --> 0:11:32.839
<v Speaker 1>up to thirteen and fourteen. Gil and Mikey lost both

0:11:32.880 --> 0:11:35.240
<v Speaker 1>their teasers to fall in six and three on teasers.

0:11:35.280 --> 0:11:37.480
<v Speaker 1>I want my teaser to go to seven and two

0:11:37.520 --> 0:11:43.040
<v Speaker 1>on teasers. So that's your little update on that teasers. Now,

0:11:43.320 --> 0:11:46.360
<v Speaker 1>as far as Thursday Night goes, I would like to

0:11:46.400 --> 0:11:48.679
<v Speaker 1>go with Bob two, but I'm not going to. The

0:11:48.720 --> 0:11:51.000
<v Speaker 1>reason I'm not going to is not because I disagree

0:11:51.040 --> 0:11:52.959
<v Speaker 1>with anything Bob says. I agree with it. I would

0:11:52.960 --> 0:11:54.880
<v Speaker 1>love to bet on Indie tonight. I think it's the

0:11:54.920 --> 0:11:57.319
<v Speaker 1>correct side. I won't do it because I started. I

0:11:57.360 --> 0:11:59.839
<v Speaker 1>went to a little meeting the other day called f

0:12:00.320 --> 0:12:04.200
<v Speaker 1>p r A. It's called philip Rivers Anonymous. I will

0:12:04.240 --> 0:12:07.880
<v Speaker 1>not bet on philip Rivers anymore p r A philip

0:12:07.960 --> 0:12:14.320
<v Speaker 1>Rivers Anonymous, and I messed up the p r A

0:12:14.400 --> 0:12:18.760
<v Speaker 1>p r A, and it means you we've all decided

0:12:18.920 --> 0:12:22.200
<v Speaker 1>as a group not to bet on Philip Rivers anymore

0:12:22.320 --> 0:12:26.360
<v Speaker 1>due to the lack of um your soul to be

0:12:26.400 --> 0:12:29.559
<v Speaker 1>able to keep coming through when he screws you late. Now,

0:12:29.600 --> 0:12:32.560
<v Speaker 1>if I wasn't in that meeting of philip Rivers Anonymous,

0:12:32.600 --> 0:12:36.400
<v Speaker 1>I would like Indie because I think that um colts

0:12:36.440 --> 0:12:39.000
<v Speaker 1>have trouble when Indie get when they get a big

0:12:39.000 --> 0:12:41.199
<v Speaker 1>pass rush against the me and you both had Baltimore

0:12:41.280 --> 0:12:44.000
<v Speaker 1>last week, Gil and I thought we were in trouble early,

0:12:44.760 --> 0:12:47.000
<v Speaker 1>and then of course the fumble recovery for the touchdown

0:12:47.000 --> 0:12:49.160
<v Speaker 1>turned the tables on the whole game. But I think

0:12:49.240 --> 0:12:52.840
<v Speaker 1>it really shows that if you if Indy has a

0:12:52.880 --> 0:12:55.200
<v Speaker 1>game where Philip Rivers is going to be pressured, they

0:12:55.240 --> 0:12:57.560
<v Speaker 1>have no chance because obviously he can't move, But if

0:12:57.600 --> 0:12:59.640
<v Speaker 1>they have a situation where he can, you know, just

0:12:59.679 --> 0:13:02.800
<v Speaker 1>sit and pick people apart, like tonight, Tennessee is not

0:13:02.880 --> 0:13:05.680
<v Speaker 1>very good defensively. You know, I like Indie two, but

0:13:05.800 --> 0:13:08.600
<v Speaker 1>like I said, I won't bet on Philip Rivers. Todd,

0:13:08.679 --> 0:13:11.719
<v Speaker 1>you you summed up my thoughts on this game perfectly,

0:13:11.840 --> 0:13:13.719
<v Speaker 1>because if I had not attended that meeting, I don't

0:13:13.720 --> 0:13:15.160
<v Speaker 1>know if you saw me in the back of the class.

0:13:15.160 --> 0:13:16.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't like to show myself. I was in the back.

0:13:17.080 --> 0:13:19.360
<v Speaker 1>But well, it's anonymous, we're really not supposed to be

0:13:19.360 --> 0:13:23.640
<v Speaker 1>talking about. Yeah. I would probably go to the Indianapolis

0:13:23.679 --> 0:13:25.400
<v Speaker 1>side as well. Uh and but let me just talk

0:13:25.400 --> 0:13:28.520
<v Speaker 1>about that Baltimore Indianapolis game for a second. We've talked

0:13:28.520 --> 0:13:30.320
<v Speaker 1>about this forever on a Numbers game I know you

0:13:30.320 --> 0:13:32.200
<v Speaker 1>and I did on Wish I have Wednesdays last year.

0:13:32.920 --> 0:13:35.319
<v Speaker 1>Key fourth in one situation for the Colts in that

0:13:35.440 --> 0:13:38.719
<v Speaker 1>game last week against Baltimore, They're down twenty one to ten.

0:13:39.040 --> 0:13:42.120
<v Speaker 1>There's five thirty four left in the game. It's fourth

0:13:42.120 --> 0:13:44.720
<v Speaker 1>and one. At the Baltimore six team kick a field goal,

0:13:44.760 --> 0:13:46.320
<v Speaker 1>they go down eight. Okay, they decided to go for

0:13:46.600 --> 0:13:49.240
<v Speaker 1>fourth and one. What do we know about Philip Rivers teams?

0:13:49.520 --> 0:13:53.680
<v Speaker 1>He does not sneak. He doesn't sneak. The defense never

0:13:53.720 --> 0:13:58.160
<v Speaker 1>has to prepare for it. Pass play never has a chance. Typical.

0:13:58.200 --> 0:14:02.400
<v Speaker 1>Philip Rivers typical. And that's such a key point in

0:14:02.520 --> 0:14:05.920
<v Speaker 1>games where the defense doesn't have it's a competitive advantage

0:14:05.920 --> 0:14:08.040
<v Speaker 1>for them. I really believe that you need is bruder

0:14:08.280 --> 0:14:11.439
<v Speaker 1>z Appruter film to find Philip Rivers sneaks. So I

0:14:11.480 --> 0:14:15.280
<v Speaker 1>can't play this game. Rivers has a better spread record

0:14:15.280 --> 0:14:20.200
<v Speaker 1>than Tannehill this year. The same where's that Mikey best bet? Bob?

0:14:20.320 --> 0:14:23.160
<v Speaker 1>That was your number one best bet? Right? Oh? That

0:14:23.240 --> 0:14:25.160
<v Speaker 1>was one of them. I just, oh, there are we

0:14:25.280 --> 0:14:27.320
<v Speaker 1>ranking the best bets? Yeah? That was my number one.

0:14:27.440 --> 0:14:29.440
<v Speaker 1>That was his number one. Alright, Mikey, you're number one

0:14:29.680 --> 0:14:31.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna go back to I'll go back to a

0:14:31.760 --> 0:14:33.600
<v Speaker 1>team I've had the last two weeks. I lost with

0:14:33.680 --> 0:14:35.560
<v Speaker 1>them two weeks ago, covered last week. I'm gonna go

0:14:35.600 --> 0:14:39.120
<v Speaker 1>back to the Baltimore Ravens UH playing against New England.

0:14:39.680 --> 0:14:43.480
<v Speaker 1>UH in the evening game on Sunday, listen, New England

0:14:43.520 --> 0:14:46.200
<v Speaker 1>could not stop the Jets running the football. Before you

0:14:46.240 --> 0:14:48.800
<v Speaker 1>get into the discussion, what what line are we giving him,

0:14:48.800 --> 0:14:53.640
<v Speaker 1>Gil Baltimore is that's an excellent question. I think it's

0:14:53.680 --> 0:14:59.120
<v Speaker 1>mostly seven sevens not happening with that, Well, it's not

0:14:59.160 --> 0:15:04.000
<v Speaker 1>seven and a half. So the New England had no

0:15:04.080 --> 0:15:06.240
<v Speaker 1>ability to stop the Jets from running the football and

0:15:06.360 --> 0:15:09.440
<v Speaker 1>and by all means, Adam Gaze did a masterful job

0:15:10.480 --> 0:15:12.840
<v Speaker 1>avoiding a win on Monday Night. In the game, they

0:15:12.840 --> 0:15:15.880
<v Speaker 1>really should look how good Flacco look because of the

0:15:15.880 --> 0:15:17.880
<v Speaker 1>play action they had to try to commit to the run.

0:15:17.920 --> 0:15:20.680
<v Speaker 1>They were missing Gilmore. But here's the point, Baltimore is

0:15:20.720 --> 0:15:24.520
<v Speaker 1>going to be a Baltimore plays well against bad teams. Baltimore,

0:15:25.480 --> 0:15:29.360
<v Speaker 1>it's too fast on defense for New England to be

0:15:29.440 --> 0:15:31.600
<v Speaker 1>able to sustain drives. It's not going to be like

0:15:31.760 --> 0:15:34.600
<v Speaker 1>where Belichick could just control the whole clock in the

0:15:34.640 --> 0:15:36.920
<v Speaker 1>fourth quarter and not let the Jets onto the field.

0:15:37.160 --> 0:15:39.280
<v Speaker 1>That's not happening. Baltimore is going to be able to

0:15:39.320 --> 0:15:40.960
<v Speaker 1>run the ball at will, and when they can run

0:15:41.000 --> 0:15:47.120
<v Speaker 1>the ball, Lamar Jackson can be an effective play action passer. Um.

0:15:46.480 --> 0:15:48.960
<v Speaker 1>I would lay up to ten ten and a half

0:15:48.960 --> 0:15:50.440
<v Speaker 1>in this say, I just don't think this game is

0:15:50.440 --> 0:15:53.440
<v Speaker 1>going to be close. Baltimore will get to the lead,

0:15:53.480 --> 0:15:56.960
<v Speaker 1>and when they play from the lead, they're devastatingly good team. Uh,

0:15:57.760 --> 0:15:59.560
<v Speaker 1>this is one of my better best bets of the year.

0:15:59.640 --> 0:16:04.440
<v Speaker 1>Ravens minus seven minus seven wait, wait to stop while

0:16:04.440 --> 0:16:08.000
<v Speaker 1>I was adjusting my mask. Seven. That's all right? What

0:16:08.080 --> 0:16:09.480
<v Speaker 1>of your favorite ones of the year? You said, I

0:16:09.520 --> 0:16:14.720
<v Speaker 1>really like this playoff? Okay, I like it Todd number one.

0:16:15.720 --> 0:16:17.920
<v Speaker 1>You know I I I'm with Mikey on this one.

0:16:18.000 --> 0:16:20.320
<v Speaker 1>I like it a lot to one of my you know,

0:16:21.000 --> 0:16:22.840
<v Speaker 1>I would say it's my best bet. Two. I'm going

0:16:22.880 --> 0:16:25.680
<v Speaker 1>with Baltimore minus seven to I. I just think that

0:16:26.360 --> 0:16:30.120
<v Speaker 1>Baltimore beats up on bad teams. Um. New England is

0:16:30.160 --> 0:16:32.640
<v Speaker 1>not a good team this year. Uh. If you have

0:16:32.760 --> 0:16:35.800
<v Speaker 1>to struggle to beat the Jets, come on, I mean,

0:16:35.840 --> 0:16:38.520
<v Speaker 1>who are we kidding? Have you watched this the Denver game.

0:16:38.600 --> 0:16:42.440
<v Speaker 1>Did you see how poorly they were offensively against Denver?

0:16:42.640 --> 0:16:46.800
<v Speaker 1>They're just not a very offensively explosive football team. Cam

0:16:46.800 --> 0:16:50.360
<v Speaker 1>Newton is not super accurate anyways, There's no one to

0:16:50.400 --> 0:16:53.200
<v Speaker 1>throw to even if he was accurate. Uh, you know,

0:16:53.240 --> 0:16:57.440
<v Speaker 1>they give it to running backs. They're not super exciting.

0:16:57.760 --> 0:17:00.400
<v Speaker 1>They're just struggle offensively. I mean, sure they could score

0:17:00.440 --> 0:17:02.880
<v Speaker 1>against the Jets on eight team play drives, but how

0:17:02.880 --> 0:17:04.920
<v Speaker 1>are you going to do that against Baltimore. I think

0:17:04.960 --> 0:17:07.679
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna get killed. And Baltimore loves to beat up

0:17:07.720 --> 0:17:10.520
<v Speaker 1>on bad teams, so you know Belichick is gonna pull

0:17:10.560 --> 0:17:13.280
<v Speaker 1>out all the stops and everything. But I I just

0:17:13.320 --> 0:17:16.080
<v Speaker 1>like Baltimore minus seven. I mean, come on, this is

0:17:16.160 --> 0:17:19.240
<v Speaker 1>this is a tale of totally different classes of teams.

0:17:19.359 --> 0:17:22.720
<v Speaker 1>The Jets thing the other night was very peculiar, wasn't it.

0:17:22.840 --> 0:17:25.359
<v Speaker 1>There was a fourth and three in the first half.

0:17:25.400 --> 0:17:26.880
<v Speaker 1>I think it was three to nothing at the time.

0:17:26.920 --> 0:17:31.320
<v Speaker 1>Don't hold me to that. They were in plus territory

0:17:31.400 --> 0:17:33.280
<v Speaker 1>and they punted and that was like, what are they

0:17:33.320 --> 0:17:36.200
<v Speaker 1>doing their own eight? And then late in that game,

0:17:36.240 --> 0:17:39.520
<v Speaker 1>when they're still up, Flacco with with what amounted to

0:17:39.640 --> 0:17:42.359
<v Speaker 1>a fourth and one punt excuse me, a first down

0:17:42.400 --> 0:17:44.439
<v Speaker 1>punt where he just threw the ball up in the

0:17:44.480 --> 0:17:48.440
<v Speaker 1>air gets picked. Uh. And then they had the twelve

0:17:48.480 --> 0:17:52.919
<v Speaker 1>men on the field during a field goal. Okay uh.

0:17:52.960 --> 0:17:54.560
<v Speaker 1>And then there was a third and twenty for the

0:17:54.600 --> 0:17:56.800
<v Speaker 1>Patriots where the Jets played off the receivers and they

0:17:56.800 --> 0:17:59.960
<v Speaker 1>got nineteen and you're like, they really, they really try

0:18:00.480 --> 0:18:02.480
<v Speaker 1>to win this. And so for those of us the

0:18:02.480 --> 0:18:05.080
<v Speaker 1>survivor who were like rooting heavily against the people who

0:18:05.080 --> 0:18:07.720
<v Speaker 1>have had New England, that was a bitter pill to swallow,

0:18:07.720 --> 0:18:11.119
<v Speaker 1>but it didn't make you wonder. And I'm no conspiracy theorist,

0:18:11.160 --> 0:18:12.600
<v Speaker 1>but there was a lot of things that happened in

0:18:12.600 --> 0:18:14.440
<v Speaker 1>that football game. By the way, that was a great

0:18:14.600 --> 0:18:17.320
<v Speaker 1>That was a great in game opportunity. I had the

0:18:17.359 --> 0:18:20.160
<v Speaker 1>over in that game. Midway through the second quarter. Both

0:18:20.200 --> 0:18:23.080
<v Speaker 1>teams were averaging seven point two yards per play. At

0:18:23.080 --> 0:18:25.520
<v Speaker 1>the time. The game was supposed to be like line

0:18:25.600 --> 0:18:28.120
<v Speaker 1>forty or forty two. Before the game, no one thought

0:18:28.160 --> 0:18:31.040
<v Speaker 1>any points would be scored, so there was absolutely no

0:18:31.160 --> 0:18:34.120
<v Speaker 1>correlation to the way the game was playing at seven

0:18:34.200 --> 0:18:36.480
<v Speaker 1>point two yards per play for each team and what

0:18:36.560 --> 0:18:39.720
<v Speaker 1>the actual line was it went easily over even with

0:18:40.000 --> 0:18:43.720
<v Speaker 1>drives that were like eleven minutes long. So you know, guys,

0:18:43.800 --> 0:18:46.160
<v Speaker 1>in game, if you're not watching this in game stuff,

0:18:46.200 --> 0:18:48.080
<v Speaker 1>you know you gotta do it. It's it's there's so

0:18:48.160 --> 0:18:51.560
<v Speaker 1>many opportunities. My my number one pick this week is

0:18:51.560 --> 0:18:54.760
<v Speaker 1>the Cleveland Browns minus three against the Texans. Uh. This

0:18:54.840 --> 0:18:57.840
<v Speaker 1>was on guessing lines with Chrissie Andrews on Monday. This

0:18:57.920 --> 0:19:01.760
<v Speaker 1>was the line that clearly jumped off the page to

0:19:01.800 --> 0:19:04.080
<v Speaker 1>me and made it. It made the least sense of all.

0:19:04.640 --> 0:19:07.720
<v Speaker 1>I guessed Cleveland minus four and a half, and I thought,

0:19:07.760 --> 0:19:10.480
<v Speaker 1>if anything, I was gonna be light. And he told me,

0:19:10.520 --> 0:19:12.600
<v Speaker 1>he goes. You know, I said, I like your line better.

0:19:13.000 --> 0:19:14.840
<v Speaker 1>I see nothing but two and a half and threes.

0:19:15.200 --> 0:19:17.320
<v Speaker 1>And then you thought, well, maybe this is because Baker

0:19:17.400 --> 0:19:22.080
<v Speaker 1>Mayfield is in the reserve COVID nineteen lists, and so

0:19:22.119 --> 0:19:26.119
<v Speaker 1>it's some kind of strange, nebulous thing that's happening. Nope,

0:19:26.720 --> 0:19:30.040
<v Speaker 1>Baker Mayfield uh is off that he is eligible to play.

0:19:30.080 --> 0:19:33.119
<v Speaker 1>He will play, and it's minus three with extra juice.

0:19:33.160 --> 0:19:35.879
<v Speaker 1>That's the consensus, right right, I see three and a

0:19:35.960 --> 0:19:38.199
<v Speaker 1>half and and one three minus twenty five? What do

0:19:38.240 --> 0:19:42.760
<v Speaker 1>you see Dr bob um it's split. I think three

0:19:42.800 --> 0:19:46.600
<v Speaker 1>minus twenty five or three and a a half is a choice.

0:19:47.240 --> 0:19:48.800
<v Speaker 1>I think we we need to give you three and

0:19:48.840 --> 0:19:51.359
<v Speaker 1>a half to be fair. Go oh wait a minute,

0:19:51.359 --> 0:19:54.560
<v Speaker 1>I see nothing but threes. Three minus twenty five is

0:19:54.640 --> 0:19:57.800
<v Speaker 1>probably consensus. Three minus twenty five is consensus, Todd. That's

0:19:57.800 --> 0:19:59.800
<v Speaker 1>how this works. You don't give me a minus three

0:19:59.800 --> 0:20:02.480
<v Speaker 1>and a half in minus one ten? Well, three is

0:20:02.520 --> 0:20:04.320
<v Speaker 1>almost three and a half. But okay, it is whatever.

0:20:04.359 --> 0:20:06.680
<v Speaker 1>But I'm just looking across the screen and the kinsensis

0:20:06.720 --> 0:20:10.560
<v Speaker 1>of minus three minus one anyway, Okay, are you gonna

0:20:10.680 --> 0:20:13.240
<v Speaker 1>Are you gonna if this pick loses town? Are you

0:20:13.280 --> 0:20:18.400
<v Speaker 1>gonna grade Gil has more than one loss? Because it's

0:20:17.680 --> 0:20:20.280
<v Speaker 1>great point. It's a great point, Mike. Maybe we should

0:20:20.320 --> 0:20:22.040
<v Speaker 1>do that, give him a quarter loss. There you go.

0:20:22.400 --> 0:20:23.840
<v Speaker 1>Let's just have that for the rest of the year,

0:20:23.880 --> 0:20:28.720
<v Speaker 1>hanging on it if it doesn't be awesome. Houston's only

0:20:28.760 --> 0:20:33.240
<v Speaker 1>wins this year Jacksonville and Jacksonville UM, and they have

0:20:33.400 --> 0:20:36.040
<v Speaker 1>lost to everybody else. It's been a tough schedule though,

0:20:36.119 --> 0:20:40.760
<v Speaker 1>Kansas City, Baltimore, Pittsburgh, Minnesota, Tennessee, and Green Bay. So

0:20:40.880 --> 0:20:43.240
<v Speaker 1>no real shame and all that, but they do get

0:20:43.280 --> 0:20:45.600
<v Speaker 1>housed by most of most of those teams. Anyway, I'll

0:20:45.600 --> 0:20:46.960
<v Speaker 1>just get back to the original. I'm gonna just go

0:20:47.000 --> 0:20:50.000
<v Speaker 1>with my first instinct. This line makes no sense to me.

0:20:50.119 --> 0:20:52.720
<v Speaker 1>Cleveland is by far a better football team. Deshaun Watson

0:20:52.720 --> 0:20:55.280
<v Speaker 1>came out this week and said, if will Fuller had

0:20:55.320 --> 0:20:59.119
<v Speaker 1>been traded, it would have sent him into depression. I

0:20:59.160 --> 0:21:03.480
<v Speaker 1>don't think that football team is right. They don't scare me. Jacksonville.

0:21:03.560 --> 0:21:06.680
<v Speaker 1>Jake Luton, in his first game as a pro, went

0:21:06.720 --> 0:21:10.040
<v Speaker 1>for over three hundred yards against the Texans defense and

0:21:10.080 --> 0:21:13.239
<v Speaker 1>they needed to stave off a two point conversion to

0:21:13.280 --> 0:21:17.840
<v Speaker 1>prevent overtime. Give me the Browns minus three extra juice

0:21:19.359 --> 0:21:23.720
<v Speaker 1>my number one pick, Bob number two. I'm gonna go

0:21:23.760 --> 0:21:28.120
<v Speaker 1>with Philadelphia now. The Eagles have been struggling all year

0:21:28.280 --> 0:21:31.359
<v Speaker 1>to stay the least, and they struggled against the Giants

0:21:31.400 --> 0:21:35.000
<v Speaker 1>when they played them in the Meadowlands. But Philadelphia is

0:21:35.840 --> 0:21:39.880
<v Speaker 1>healthier now than they've been in a while. Um they

0:21:39.920 --> 0:21:43.879
<v Speaker 1>get four skill position players back this week, well, not

0:21:43.920 --> 0:21:46.200
<v Speaker 1>all of them back this week, but Miles Sanders is back,

0:21:46.359 --> 0:21:50.359
<v Speaker 1>Jasen Rigor and Dallas go to the tight end and

0:21:50.400 --> 0:21:54.959
<v Speaker 1>Al Sean Jeffrey, so they have more weapons for Carson Wentz,

0:21:54.960 --> 0:21:57.080
<v Speaker 1>and I think he's been really struggling because he's been

0:21:57.119 --> 0:22:00.199
<v Speaker 1>forcing a lot of throws. And I think that more

0:22:00.280 --> 0:22:05.520
<v Speaker 1>people open now with all these receivers back, plus Miles Sanders. UM,

0:22:05.600 --> 0:22:07.000
<v Speaker 1>so I think we're gonna have a good match up there.

0:22:07.000 --> 0:22:10.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean, Giants have one good defensive back in James

0:22:10.359 --> 0:22:14.240
<v Speaker 1>Bradberry UM and he'll probably take Travis Fulgan and that

0:22:14.320 --> 0:22:16.520
<v Speaker 1>might be a toss up when he might shut him down.

0:22:16.520 --> 0:22:18.800
<v Speaker 1>But now Lens has other targets that he can go to,

0:22:19.200 --> 0:22:22.119
<v Speaker 1>and the rest of the Giants cornerbacks are combining to

0:22:22.200 --> 0:22:25.480
<v Speaker 1>surrender one point seven yards per cover snap, which, if

0:22:25.520 --> 0:22:27.960
<v Speaker 1>you know anything about yards per cover snap, one point

0:22:28.040 --> 0:22:30.760
<v Speaker 1>six six is not good. It's very bad. So I

0:22:30.800 --> 0:22:34.400
<v Speaker 1>think Philadelphia will definitely be better equipped this time around

0:22:34.680 --> 0:22:37.960
<v Speaker 1>against the Giants defense. UM, and they're gonna put a

0:22:38.000 --> 0:22:41.320
<v Speaker 1>lot of pressure on Daniel Jones as as usual. Um

0:22:41.480 --> 0:22:44.400
<v Speaker 1>He's face pressure league high forty three of the time.

0:22:44.880 --> 0:22:47.240
<v Speaker 1>I don't see how anybody's gonna block flex or Cox.

0:22:47.320 --> 0:22:50.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean, they're their guards and centers are terrible. The Giants,

0:22:50.400 --> 0:22:55.000
<v Speaker 1>speaking of Um, the right tackle Fleming ranks forty nine

0:22:55.000 --> 0:22:58.920
<v Speaker 1>out of fifty five qualifying tackles and blocking efficiency pass

0:22:58.920 --> 0:23:02.120
<v Speaker 1>blocking efficiency that is, and they'll have trouble with Brandon

0:23:02.160 --> 0:23:04.440
<v Speaker 1>Graham with seven sacks, it's just fourth in the league.

0:23:04.440 --> 0:23:06.600
<v Speaker 1>So I think they'll get acbility, will get a lot

0:23:06.600 --> 0:23:08.879
<v Speaker 1>of pressure, and they'll have more options on offense. And

0:23:08.920 --> 0:23:11.360
<v Speaker 1>I think when Philadelphia is healthy as they are now,

0:23:11.400 --> 0:23:12.760
<v Speaker 1>I think they were better than average team. And the

0:23:12.800 --> 0:23:15.719
<v Speaker 1>Giants I think they still suck. I mean, they were

0:23:15.720 --> 0:23:17.520
<v Speaker 1>out game by three yards of play last week, and

0:23:17.520 --> 0:23:19.639
<v Speaker 1>they're winn against Washington and they were plus five in

0:23:19.680 --> 0:23:22.239
<v Speaker 1>turnovers and barely won the game. So I think it's

0:23:22.240 --> 0:23:24.080
<v Speaker 1>a good opportunity. I think maybe that game gets as

0:23:24.119 --> 0:23:25.960
<v Speaker 1>lined out of here. So I like Philly minus the

0:23:26.000 --> 0:23:30.560
<v Speaker 1>three and a half average corner back three five. Look

0:23:30.560 --> 0:23:32.000
<v Speaker 1>at that, I could do the I could play the

0:23:32.000 --> 0:23:38.960
<v Speaker 1>Guild game here, the Guild game twenty five. By the way,

0:23:39.240 --> 0:23:45.160
<v Speaker 1>Bob average allow average cornerback in terms of their targets

0:23:45.200 --> 0:23:51.000
<v Speaker 1>allows what about six completion rate um wide receivers? Yeah

0:23:51.080 --> 0:23:56.680
<v Speaker 1>around there, okay, probably a little. Yeah. The yards cover

0:23:56.800 --> 0:24:00.720
<v Speaker 1>snap is one point four, you know, something like that,

0:24:00.760 --> 0:24:02.480
<v Speaker 1>one point three, one point four there at one point

0:24:02.480 --> 0:24:06.320
<v Speaker 1>six six if I'm good, all right, Philadelphia minus three

0:24:06.359 --> 0:24:10.000
<v Speaker 1>extra juice number two for you, Mikey. I like the

0:24:10.040 --> 0:24:13.800
<v Speaker 1>Buffalo Bills. Oh do you the Buffalo Bills? Todd? What's

0:24:13.840 --> 0:24:20.440
<v Speaker 1>the number that you have as a consensus Bills? I have, yeah,

0:24:20.480 --> 0:24:23.120
<v Speaker 1>one and a half two, something like that. I'd say too,

0:24:23.160 --> 0:24:24.800
<v Speaker 1>because I see some two and a half two. That's

0:24:24.840 --> 0:24:26.919
<v Speaker 1>too okay. I'll take the Bills plus two. I like

0:24:27.000 --> 0:24:28.960
<v Speaker 1>the spot that that the Bills are in right now.

0:24:29.000 --> 0:24:31.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we're starting to see the progression of Josh

0:24:31.800 --> 0:24:34.440
<v Speaker 1>Allen here and in an ability to run an offense

0:24:35.240 --> 0:24:39.560
<v Speaker 1>um that has some balance to it. I'm, you know,

0:24:39.720 --> 0:24:43.359
<v Speaker 1>in the I first sense some issues with this Cardinals

0:24:43.440 --> 0:24:46.960
<v Speaker 1>offense and that Monday night game against Dallas. This this

0:24:47.000 --> 0:24:49.760
<v Speaker 1>team is just doesn't click on all cylinders. I don't

0:24:49.760 --> 0:24:51.399
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what's missing there. I don't know if

0:24:51.400 --> 0:24:55.159
<v Speaker 1>it's the play calling. I don't know if it's Kyler Murray,

0:24:55.320 --> 0:24:57.639
<v Speaker 1>but I don't know if it's a lack of talent

0:24:57.720 --> 0:25:00.919
<v Speaker 1>at wide receiver. But this car No offense should be

0:25:00.960 --> 0:25:04.320
<v Speaker 1>more productive than it is, especially in terms of of

0:25:04.320 --> 0:25:07.280
<v Speaker 1>of passing efficiency. I think the Bills are a team

0:25:07.280 --> 0:25:09.400
<v Speaker 1>on the rise. You're getting the benefit of travel even

0:25:09.400 --> 0:25:11.879
<v Speaker 1>though it's not really a home field advantage, and making

0:25:11.960 --> 0:25:14.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, on a neutral field, Buffalo would be favorite.

0:25:14.000 --> 0:25:16.840
<v Speaker 1>I would think, um, and so I think you get

0:25:16.840 --> 0:25:18.760
<v Speaker 1>the better team here and you're getting a couple of points,

0:25:19.000 --> 0:25:21.040
<v Speaker 1>and I think this is a solid team and the

0:25:21.320 --> 0:25:24.040
<v Speaker 1>defense he's got a better head coach. I'll take the bills.

0:25:24.160 --> 0:25:29.640
<v Speaker 1>That screams one of my teaser legs coming up, screams

0:25:28.160 --> 0:25:31.760
<v Speaker 1>and show. She would be great for the show. Whether

0:25:31.920 --> 0:25:33.640
<v Speaker 1>what do you think she's great or not, she'd still

0:25:33.640 --> 0:25:35.800
<v Speaker 1>be great for the show for the show. Can I

0:25:35.880 --> 0:25:38.280
<v Speaker 1>just say something about Cliff Kingsbury just for a minute,

0:25:38.280 --> 0:25:40.640
<v Speaker 1>because he killed my over thirty four and a half

0:25:40.640 --> 0:25:44.040
<v Speaker 1>in game and my Arizona last week. I don't know

0:25:44.080 --> 0:25:48.920
<v Speaker 1>if you guys watched the absolute nonsense fourth down and one.

0:25:49.000 --> 0:25:52.040
<v Speaker 1>It's thirty one, all six or seven minutes to go,

0:25:52.640 --> 0:25:55.679
<v Speaker 1>and they've given Kyler Murray has been unstoppable on the

0:25:55.760 --> 0:26:01.040
<v Speaker 1>short yard. Instead they hand off some other dude who

0:26:01.040 --> 0:26:03.560
<v Speaker 1>can't even come close to getting a first down. Now

0:26:03.840 --> 0:26:05.880
<v Speaker 1>Miami gets the ball, goes down, kicks the field goal,

0:26:06.040 --> 0:26:08.640
<v Speaker 1>and now here comes Arizona. Back again, fourth and one,

0:26:08.680 --> 0:26:11.639
<v Speaker 1>again from the thirty one, and this time the dope

0:26:11.720 --> 0:26:13.919
<v Speaker 1>decides to kick a field goal with less than two

0:26:13.960 --> 0:26:15.959
<v Speaker 1>minutes ago. I don't understand why you would even kick

0:26:15.960 --> 0:26:17.720
<v Speaker 1>a field You're only tied and you give them a

0:26:17.760 --> 0:26:19.920
<v Speaker 1>minute and a half to win the game. Anyways, it's

0:26:19.920 --> 0:26:22.199
<v Speaker 1>a stupid decision in the first place. And then if

0:26:22.200 --> 0:26:24.119
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna go ahead and do it, maybe have a

0:26:24.200 --> 0:26:26.440
<v Speaker 1>kicker who can make a forty seven yard and come

0:26:26.520 --> 0:26:30.320
<v Speaker 1>up short short. Came up short. That's the crime, right,

0:26:30.640 --> 0:26:33.040
<v Speaker 1>How do you come up short in the NFL on

0:26:33.080 --> 0:26:37.639
<v Speaker 1>a forty seven yard or with beautiful field conditions. It's ridiculous.

0:26:37.760 --> 0:26:42.360
<v Speaker 1>It could only happen to me. Thanks Hashem Sham does

0:26:42.400 --> 0:26:46.080
<v Speaker 1>it again? Oh Hasham always getting a ton? By the way,

0:26:46.080 --> 0:26:48.040
<v Speaker 1>just to be fair, it was a forty nine yarder

0:26:48.320 --> 0:26:51.960
<v Speaker 1>from Zaying gets Allas whatever. I don't care whether it's God.

0:26:51.960 --> 0:26:54.000
<v Speaker 1>I've made my pick, but I want to raise this

0:26:54.080 --> 0:26:57.440
<v Speaker 1>parliamentary procedure point now that we're going down this path.

0:26:57.840 --> 0:27:02.000
<v Speaker 1>Could I have taken instead no defensive or special teams

0:27:02.040 --> 0:27:04.639
<v Speaker 1>touchdown in the Packers game minus three ten? Would that

0:27:04.680 --> 0:27:08.359
<v Speaker 1>have been allowed as a pick? I'm pretty sure that's

0:27:08.400 --> 0:27:11.240
<v Speaker 1>not allowed. Okay, I'm just just clarifying. But we do

0:27:11.440 --> 0:27:13.399
<v Speaker 1>we do a contest on a prime time action. We

0:27:13.480 --> 0:27:15.800
<v Speaker 1>just do a golf draft where we just get five picks.

0:27:16.160 --> 0:27:19.120
<v Speaker 1>It could be in any market outright, top ten, head

0:27:19.119 --> 0:27:22.119
<v Speaker 1>to heads whatever and uh and Kelly Bidlin went with

0:27:22.520 --> 0:27:26.480
<v Speaker 1>top top Canadian or something, a top nationality and he

0:27:26.800 --> 0:27:29.199
<v Speaker 1>wedged his way into a you know, a victory that way.

0:27:29.240 --> 0:27:30.880
<v Speaker 1>We're like, I don't think you could do that next time.

0:27:31.280 --> 0:27:34.560
<v Speaker 1>That doesn't sound fair. So now that's all we're doing. Um,

0:27:34.600 --> 0:27:36.920
<v Speaker 1>who are we? Where are we taught? Your number two? Four? Mike?

0:27:36.920 --> 0:27:38.600
<v Speaker 1>He has given three picks. Me and you each have

0:27:38.640 --> 0:27:41.240
<v Speaker 1>given one pick, and Bob's given two picks. All right,

0:27:41.440 --> 0:27:45.119
<v Speaker 1>number two from you, Toddy, Okay, my second pick is

0:27:45.119 --> 0:27:49.800
<v Speaker 1>gonna be the Tampa Bay Tampa Bay Buccaneers. Bhoy, did

0:27:49.800 --> 0:27:53.920
<v Speaker 1>that team look bad last week? I like good teams

0:27:53.960 --> 0:27:58.560
<v Speaker 1>that got embarrassed the week before, if we uh noticed, uh,

0:27:58.640 --> 0:28:02.080
<v Speaker 1>the Niners before they became aim a mash unit had

0:28:02.119 --> 0:28:04.959
<v Speaker 1>a horrible game and against Miami, came back and spanked

0:28:04.960 --> 0:28:07.600
<v Speaker 1>New England. I believe if that was the correct sequence.

0:28:07.960 --> 0:28:12.560
<v Speaker 1>But the Tampa Bay Buccaneers, I mean what's there to say?

0:28:12.600 --> 0:28:14.800
<v Speaker 1>Somehow the Saints were getting pressure on Tom he couldn't

0:28:14.840 --> 0:28:17.159
<v Speaker 1>do anything. The whole game was just a throat in

0:28:17.200 --> 0:28:20.080
<v Speaker 1>the garbage kind of game. Are the Bucks really that bad? No?

0:28:20.280 --> 0:28:22.280
<v Speaker 1>I don't think they are. Are they as great as

0:28:22.280 --> 0:28:24.879
<v Speaker 1>everyone was making them into into Super Bowl contenders? No?

0:28:25.040 --> 0:28:27.400
<v Speaker 1>I don't think they're that great either. But you have

0:28:27.520 --> 0:28:30.360
<v Speaker 1>to think that if they're going to get these players

0:28:30.400 --> 0:28:35.720
<v Speaker 1>attention and have a true, tremendous focused game, it's after

0:28:35.800 --> 0:28:39.720
<v Speaker 1>getting spanked on national television in Tom Brady's probably most

0:28:39.720 --> 0:28:42.160
<v Speaker 1>embarrassing game as a pro. I would think I can't

0:28:42.200 --> 0:28:44.800
<v Speaker 1>even remember any other game where that happened to Tom Brady.

0:28:44.880 --> 0:28:48.120
<v Speaker 1>So I gotta think that everybody in the Buccaneer building

0:28:48.560 --> 0:28:51.200
<v Speaker 1>is totally on board with making sure they have a

0:28:51.200 --> 0:28:55.160
<v Speaker 1>big performance. The Carolina Panthers ain't nothing special. There's no

0:28:55.240 --> 0:28:57.280
<v Speaker 1>reason why they shouldn't be able to cover the five

0:28:57.320 --> 0:28:58.960
<v Speaker 1>and a half or what is that the number you have,

0:28:59.000 --> 0:29:02.680
<v Speaker 1>gil five and a half or six? I got what

0:29:02.720 --> 0:29:06.840
<v Speaker 1>do we got it? Hold on? I got turned away

0:29:06.840 --> 0:29:10.520
<v Speaker 1>here like bro I got it at uh five? Hold

0:29:10.560 --> 0:29:16.040
<v Speaker 1>on six? Six, I'll take it at minus six. I

0:29:16.080 --> 0:29:19.480
<v Speaker 1>think the Buccaneers can handle this team. Um, you know,

0:29:19.560 --> 0:29:21.360
<v Speaker 1>they played him earlier in the year and pretty much

0:29:21.400 --> 0:29:24.040
<v Speaker 1>handled them easily. So I'm gonna go with the Bucks

0:29:24.080 --> 0:29:27.360
<v Speaker 1>because I gotta feel like everybody's gotta, you know, just

0:29:27.680 --> 0:29:32.120
<v Speaker 1>be totally coming back to focus because of that spanking Todd,

0:29:32.160 --> 0:29:34.240
<v Speaker 1>you and I arapo on this. My number two picks

0:29:34.320 --> 0:29:39.360
<v Speaker 1>the Carolina Panthers plus six. Um, I don't see why

0:29:39.440 --> 0:29:43.080
<v Speaker 1>I shouldn't take the six points at all. Here again,

0:29:43.400 --> 0:29:45.160
<v Speaker 1>just a triat to Dr Bob here. If we want

0:29:45.160 --> 0:29:48.200
<v Speaker 1>to tuck yards per play in terms of offense, Carolina

0:29:48.240 --> 0:29:51.160
<v Speaker 1>actually uh, and they will not have Christian McCaffrey here.

0:29:51.240 --> 0:29:53.440
<v Speaker 1>McCaffrey will come back the following week, so they got

0:29:53.440 --> 0:29:56.080
<v Speaker 1>a more optimistic diagnosis than they thought they would. But

0:29:56.080 --> 0:29:59.120
<v Speaker 1>no Christian McCaffrey here. Uh. Caroline has lost every game

0:29:59.120 --> 0:30:02.720
<v Speaker 1>that McCaffrey has play. Just coincidentally, but Carolina's six yards

0:30:02.880 --> 0:30:05.400
<v Speaker 1>uh per play on offense Tampa Bay five point five.

0:30:05.440 --> 0:30:07.560
<v Speaker 1>Tampa Bay's defense, though in yards per play, is better,

0:30:07.640 --> 0:30:10.440
<v Speaker 1>but not by an egregious margins. Also by uh just

0:30:10.600 --> 0:30:14.720
<v Speaker 1>over half a yard, and um, listen, Carolina probably could

0:30:14.800 --> 0:30:17.800
<v Speaker 1>have beaten Kansas City last week. They had a field

0:30:17.840 --> 0:30:20.480
<v Speaker 1>goal try at the end to try to do that.

0:30:20.880 --> 0:30:24.920
<v Speaker 1>They probably should have beaten New Orleans. New Orleans, that is,

0:30:25.640 --> 0:30:28.440
<v Speaker 1>but Teddy Bridgewater took a really bad sack in a

0:30:28.520 --> 0:30:32.120
<v Speaker 1>late game situation and that forced another Joey slide ridiculously

0:30:32.200 --> 0:30:34.680
<v Speaker 1>long field goal. Tim. I think the Panthers are are

0:30:34.720 --> 0:30:39.160
<v Speaker 1>a very solid football team, um, and if you're giving

0:30:39.160 --> 0:30:42.640
<v Speaker 1>me six at home, that's kind of an auto play

0:30:42.680 --> 0:30:45.200
<v Speaker 1>for me. That Tampa Bay thing on Sunday night, Man,

0:30:46.120 --> 0:30:48.960
<v Speaker 1>that was dreadful. And I get it, they're not gonna

0:30:48.960 --> 0:30:51.880
<v Speaker 1>be that bad every week, but there was a moment

0:30:51.920 --> 0:30:54.520
<v Speaker 1>there where I actually felt sorry for Tom Brady like

0:30:54.600 --> 0:30:58.120
<v Speaker 1>they they looked like some moribund team. I will take

0:30:58.160 --> 0:31:00.440
<v Speaker 1>Carolina in the six and be very happy be with

0:31:00.520 --> 0:31:02.280
<v Speaker 1>that bet. And if if Tampa Bay can beat me,

0:31:02.560 --> 0:31:08.960
<v Speaker 1>tip of the cap. We don't see that very often

0:31:08.960 --> 0:31:14.000
<v Speaker 1>on the show. Dr Bob, Bob still pick number three, Bob,

0:31:14.640 --> 0:31:17.200
<v Speaker 1>You're gonna see it again here, Gil. I like Tampa

0:31:17.240 --> 0:31:25.360
<v Speaker 1>Bay two back and back. Last week. As you know, Gil,

0:31:25.640 --> 0:31:29.200
<v Speaker 1>I was on the Saints and I thought they could

0:31:29.200 --> 0:31:31.640
<v Speaker 1>put pressure on Tom Brady as they did the first

0:31:31.680 --> 0:31:37.760
<v Speaker 1>time they played, and so far this season. Uh, tom

0:31:37.800 --> 0:31:41.120
<v Speaker 1>Brady has been well. It's been pressured thirty two times

0:31:41.120 --> 0:31:44.200
<v Speaker 1>in two games against the Saints. That makes a thirty

0:31:44.240 --> 0:31:49.320
<v Speaker 1>seven percent of his total times being pressured the entire season. Obviously,

0:31:49.320 --> 0:31:53.640
<v Speaker 1>when Tom Brady is not pressured, he does business. UM.

0:31:53.720 --> 0:31:56.520
<v Speaker 1>Last week, part of the problem for Tampa Bay was

0:31:56.600 --> 0:32:01.719
<v Speaker 1>that they're starting left guard was out. Um Ali Market

0:32:01.800 --> 0:32:04.520
<v Speaker 1>ranked second in the league in past blocking efficiency at

0:32:04.520 --> 0:32:07.680
<v Speaker 1>his position. He'll be back from his concussion this week.

0:32:08.480 --> 0:32:12.840
<v Speaker 1>The backup guard was horrible surrenders seven pressures last week,

0:32:12.880 --> 0:32:15.560
<v Speaker 1>and you know they're not gonna have that issue this week.

0:32:15.800 --> 0:32:19.840
<v Speaker 1>Carolina does not have much of a pass rush. UM

0:32:19.880 --> 0:32:22.600
<v Speaker 1>and you don't want to go against Tom terrific after

0:32:22.680 --> 0:32:25.480
<v Speaker 1>a loss. In his career, and this includes his first

0:32:25.520 --> 0:32:27.680
<v Speaker 1>year when he wasn't that good, although they did win

0:32:27.680 --> 0:32:31.080
<v Speaker 1>the Super Bowl. Um Brady is fifty three and fifteen

0:32:31.120 --> 0:32:34.000
<v Speaker 1>straight up off the loss, forty six and twenty two

0:32:34.040 --> 0:32:36.720
<v Speaker 1>against the spread, two and oh this year with the

0:32:36.760 --> 0:32:39.320
<v Speaker 1>Bucks off the loss, and if he's not laying seven

0:32:39.400 --> 0:32:41.320
<v Speaker 1>or more off the loss, thirty six and ten against

0:32:41.360 --> 0:32:44.720
<v Speaker 1>the spread in his career. UM and my math likes

0:32:45.000 --> 0:32:48.760
<v Speaker 1>favorite Tampa Bay by nine, So I like I like

0:32:48.800 --> 0:32:50.720
<v Speaker 1>Tampa Bay as well. How many of those Brady stats

0:32:50.720 --> 0:32:54.240
<v Speaker 1>are with the Panthers, They're not with He's not with

0:32:54.360 --> 0:32:59.600
<v Speaker 1>the Panthers. I mean, they're two and awful losses years.

0:33:00.760 --> 0:33:03.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm undefeated, Gil, I'm gonna I'm gonna I'm gonna override

0:33:03.400 --> 0:33:05.840
<v Speaker 1>that small sample size and say that I'm not I'm

0:33:05.840 --> 0:33:10.680
<v Speaker 1>not gonna be sample size like Joe great Off the

0:33:10.760 --> 0:33:13.440
<v Speaker 1>loss with the Niners, went to Kansas City. Great Off

0:33:13.440 --> 0:33:16.840
<v Speaker 1>the loss with Kansas City. Very Now, I'll meet you

0:33:16.880 --> 0:33:19.640
<v Speaker 1>both back here in a week. We'll reconvene, then we'll

0:33:19.640 --> 0:33:23.600
<v Speaker 1>talk about it. Okay, alright, Uh number three you already

0:33:23.640 --> 0:33:26.520
<v Speaker 1>had number three. Mike wheready had your three, which is

0:33:26.560 --> 0:33:33.880
<v Speaker 1>called sunder Colts tight Todd number three Colts Titans under

0:33:33.920 --> 0:33:39.120
<v Speaker 1>party eight and a half too. I am, I'm really

0:33:39.160 --> 0:33:44.280
<v Speaker 1>struggling here for a third, but I'm gonna go with um.

0:33:44.360 --> 0:33:47.040
<v Speaker 1>You know what I'm gonna go. I'm gonna go off on.

0:33:47.160 --> 0:33:52.840
<v Speaker 1>Mike is just gonna take the Cardinals. I'm gonna take Arizona. NUS.

0:33:54.520 --> 0:33:58.040
<v Speaker 1>I like this, and I'll tell you why. Um you know,

0:33:58.080 --> 0:34:00.320
<v Speaker 1>I think Arizona, like I said, should have won that game.

0:34:00.520 --> 0:34:03.040
<v Speaker 1>They had this game in you know, to a play great.

0:34:03.040 --> 0:34:05.560
<v Speaker 1>By the way, I was totally wrong, or I could

0:34:05.640 --> 0:34:08.040
<v Speaker 1>be totally wrong about two. I didn't say he wasn't

0:34:08.040 --> 0:34:09.760
<v Speaker 1>gonna be great. I just said he didn't show anything

0:34:09.840 --> 0:34:12.120
<v Speaker 1>against the Rams. But let me tell you something that

0:34:12.200 --> 0:34:18.720
<v Speaker 1>Miami Dolphins football team and hit it. Miami Dolphins. Miami Dolphins,

0:34:18.840 --> 0:34:22.720
<v Speaker 1>Brian Flores has taken us to the playoffs. This team

0:34:22.800 --> 0:34:27.359
<v Speaker 1>is for real. Two I is awesome. Miami Dolphins all

0:34:27.440 --> 0:34:30.759
<v Speaker 1>the way. Okay, and we got that done. Now I

0:34:30.760 --> 0:34:34.120
<v Speaker 1>get to hit it next time. You can edit right.

0:34:35.640 --> 0:34:45.400
<v Speaker 1>The Arizona Arizona should have won the football game. In

0:34:45.400 --> 0:34:48.680
<v Speaker 1>my opinion, I think that, like you know, already went

0:34:48.680 --> 0:34:53.440
<v Speaker 1>through Cliff Kingsbury's idiocy on fourth down. This this Kyler

0:34:53.520 --> 0:34:59.040
<v Speaker 1>Murray fellow, he is unbelievably elusive. Have you seen anything

0:34:59.320 --> 0:35:01.560
<v Speaker 1>like this? And and it looks like a video game.

0:35:01.920 --> 0:35:04.759
<v Speaker 1>He gets out on the corner. You can't stop this guy.

0:35:05.760 --> 0:35:09.560
<v Speaker 1>We've seen this already, Jackson, Yeah, I mean, what do

0:35:09.600 --> 0:35:15.680
<v Speaker 1>you mean we've never seen this? Jack What about Ricky?

0:35:15.800 --> 0:35:20.359
<v Speaker 1>What about Ricky Foggy? How about that we saw He's

0:35:20.400 --> 0:35:24.000
<v Speaker 1>not Vince Vince? What's the guy from Texas He's not

0:35:24.120 --> 0:35:28.960
<v Speaker 1>Vince m who couldn't throw. He's the guy the Titans

0:35:29.760 --> 0:35:33.879
<v Speaker 1>obscure character. He can throw the football and he can

0:35:33.960 --> 0:35:36.800
<v Speaker 1>run the football, and he runs the football. These guys

0:35:36.800 --> 0:35:39.720
<v Speaker 1>aren't even close to him. I've never seen an elusiveness

0:35:39.719 --> 0:35:42.680
<v Speaker 1>like like this guy has. It's incredible. I'm with Todd

0:35:42.719 --> 0:35:45.600
<v Speaker 1>on this. I think it's unlike. It's not Listen, take

0:35:45.640 --> 0:35:49.200
<v Speaker 1>your running quarterbacks from way back and Steve Young, Lamar Jackson,

0:35:49.640 --> 0:35:52.960
<v Speaker 1>of course, Russell Wilson, whoever it is, Douglas, Bobby Douglas,

0:35:53.200 --> 0:35:56.080
<v Speaker 1>whoever comes into your mind, turn your Gail Turner, Gil

0:35:56.560 --> 0:35:59.000
<v Speaker 1>who by friends used to say my buddies and DC

0:35:59.080 --> 0:36:00.440
<v Speaker 1>used to say to me, his name is Guilt turn

0:36:00.480 --> 0:36:06.160
<v Speaker 1>but hated so he turned it around. H I agree

0:36:06.200 --> 0:36:09.080
<v Speaker 1>with you, Todd. I've never seen anything quite like this kid.

0:36:09.320 --> 0:36:13.040
<v Speaker 1>It's like a water bug man. You cannot find him.

0:36:13.360 --> 0:36:16.520
<v Speaker 1>It's unbelievable. And I don't know why on fourth down

0:36:16.560 --> 0:36:18.759
<v Speaker 1>it they didn't just run that read option every single time.

0:36:18.800 --> 0:36:22.959
<v Speaker 1>It's unstoppable, absolutely unstoppable. So anyways, here's why I'm gonna

0:36:22.960 --> 0:36:27.440
<v Speaker 1>take Arizona. The bills to me are coming along. I

0:36:27.480 --> 0:36:30.040
<v Speaker 1>definitely agree with with Mikey here. This is a team

0:36:30.040 --> 0:36:32.919
<v Speaker 1>that can move the football. I don't like their defense though,

0:36:32.960 --> 0:36:35.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm not very impressed with their defense. Now you're asking

0:36:35.840 --> 0:36:39.160
<v Speaker 1>them to go on the road after a gigantic performance

0:36:39.200 --> 0:36:42.360
<v Speaker 1>against Seattle where they picked out the whipping stick. And

0:36:42.400 --> 0:36:44.080
<v Speaker 1>by the way, that was one of my over picks

0:36:44.160 --> 0:36:46.759
<v Speaker 1>last week. I didn't play a pregame and after the

0:36:46.800 --> 0:36:48.520
<v Speaker 1>first drive they went right down and scored. It was

0:36:48.560 --> 0:36:50.560
<v Speaker 1>then sixty one and I said, screw it, load the

0:36:50.560 --> 0:36:53.440
<v Speaker 1>boat on over. It was such an easy over. Seattle

0:36:53.560 --> 0:36:56.239
<v Speaker 1>is just incredible over team this year, as we said

0:36:56.760 --> 0:37:00.400
<v Speaker 1>last week. But the Bills do not have a great fence.

0:37:00.600 --> 0:37:02.239
<v Speaker 1>I think Kyler Murray is gonna be able to move

0:37:02.280 --> 0:37:05.239
<v Speaker 1>the ball on them. And you know, coming off that

0:37:05.360 --> 0:37:07.719
<v Speaker 1>huge win against Seattle, there's got there could be a

0:37:07.800 --> 0:37:11.400
<v Speaker 1>letdown here Arizona coming off a disappointing game. They should

0:37:11.400 --> 0:37:13.719
<v Speaker 1>have won the football game. You know, I get to

0:37:13.719 --> 0:37:16.239
<v Speaker 1>go against Mikey. Is there anything more fun than that?

0:37:16.600 --> 0:37:21.280
<v Speaker 1>Give me the Arizona Cardinals in the desert going down,

0:37:21.680 --> 0:37:26.040
<v Speaker 1>Joshua Allen, Boston, Bobby, what did you say, Bobby Douglas

0:37:26.120 --> 0:37:31.640
<v Speaker 1>that you said Bob Chicago Bears, se I'm old has

0:37:31.640 --> 0:37:33.759
<v Speaker 1>a little before my time, Bobby, there was a guy

0:37:33.800 --> 0:37:37.319
<v Speaker 1>named Evan, wasn't there Evans for the Bears, who also

0:37:37.400 --> 0:37:39.720
<v Speaker 1>was like a running quarterback in the seventies and sevens.

0:37:39.719 --> 0:37:42.160
<v Speaker 1>Was not a running quarterback. It was sort of a

0:37:42.239 --> 0:37:47.600
<v Speaker 1>running quarterback, not really, not really, Bob Evelini is who

0:37:47.600 --> 0:37:53.200
<v Speaker 1>you're atin? Oh? My number three, I'm like, Utah, I

0:37:53.239 --> 0:37:55.600
<v Speaker 1>don't really know. After number two, it's sort of tough

0:37:55.640 --> 0:38:00.880
<v Speaker 1>for me to come up with the number three. Um,

0:38:00.920 --> 0:38:05.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm just gonna play the San Francisco forty Niners depletion.

0:38:05.760 --> 0:38:08.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna go with the Saints, right like, that's what

0:38:08.040 --> 0:38:11.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna do. I'm just gonna I'm just gonna Yeah,

0:38:11.520 --> 0:38:13.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm just gonna act like what we saw with the

0:38:13.560 --> 0:38:17.480
<v Speaker 1>Niners is what we're gonna get from the Niners through

0:38:17.600 --> 0:38:20.799
<v Speaker 1>number you always got to get the best of the

0:38:20.880 --> 0:38:27.360
<v Speaker 1>number nine. I'm gonna lay the nine here because I

0:38:27.440 --> 0:38:29.879
<v Speaker 1>just don't think San Francisco has bodies to do this,

0:38:30.640 --> 0:38:34.360
<v Speaker 1>and um, they do have a turnstyle running back. It

0:38:34.360 --> 0:38:37.200
<v Speaker 1>doesn't seem to matter who they plug in there. But

0:38:37.280 --> 0:38:40.640
<v Speaker 1>I just think the loss of Kittle was massive in

0:38:41.280 --> 0:38:44.360
<v Speaker 1>all kinds of ways. On offense. That just takes a

0:38:44.360 --> 0:38:46.640
<v Speaker 1>whole dimension out for them. Jordan Reed can't stay on

0:38:46.640 --> 0:38:49.640
<v Speaker 1>a football field to save his life, even though he

0:38:49.760 --> 0:38:53.480
<v Speaker 1>once had great promise. I don't think the Niners can

0:38:53.680 --> 0:38:56.520
<v Speaker 1>can less as great as Kyle Shanahan is. I think

0:38:56.600 --> 0:38:59.400
<v Speaker 1>Sean Payton can outdo him in this as well. By

0:38:59.440 --> 0:39:01.680
<v Speaker 1>the way, I've been killing Taysom Hill and their inclusion

0:39:01.680 --> 0:39:03.919
<v Speaker 1>of Taysom Hill into the offense time and time again

0:39:03.960 --> 0:39:06.560
<v Speaker 1>this year. Man Taysom Hill look real good the other

0:39:06.680 --> 0:39:10.960
<v Speaker 1>night in all kinds of ways, filling up a box score. Um,

0:39:11.000 --> 0:39:12.600
<v Speaker 1>I'll take New Orleans and I'll give up the night.

0:39:12.600 --> 0:39:14.839
<v Speaker 1>It's not something I like doing. But I just don't

0:39:14.840 --> 0:39:17.000
<v Speaker 1>think San Francis. I think San Francisco has waived the

0:39:17.000 --> 0:39:19.239
<v Speaker 1>white flag. I think that when they traded Kwan Alexander too.

0:39:19.239 --> 0:39:22.040
<v Speaker 1>I just think they're like, you know what, this and

0:39:22.200 --> 0:39:24.799
<v Speaker 1>this isn't gonna work out this year. And I'll ride

0:39:24.800 --> 0:39:26.719
<v Speaker 1>that sentiment. I'll take the Saints for lack of a

0:39:26.840 --> 0:39:31.759
<v Speaker 1>better other option. It'll be the Saints minus nine. All right,

0:39:32.360 --> 0:39:35.560
<v Speaker 1>silence from the crowd, All right, let's do uh Teasers

0:39:35.560 --> 0:39:39.560
<v Speaker 1>of the week. Todd in the teaser lead he's in

0:39:39.600 --> 0:39:44.839
<v Speaker 1>the A T. S. T Sell and the teasers, you guys,

0:39:44.840 --> 0:39:46.640
<v Speaker 1>are both six and three. So our teasers have been

0:39:47.120 --> 0:39:50.279
<v Speaker 1>spot on this year. We have been absolutely pounding the teasers. Now.

0:39:50.320 --> 0:39:52.000
<v Speaker 1>The reason we all went from six to one, Me

0:39:52.040 --> 0:39:53.640
<v Speaker 1>and Mike went from six one, six and three is

0:39:53.680 --> 0:39:55.840
<v Speaker 1>we didn't have Stanford long teaser legs available to us

0:39:55.880 --> 0:39:58.200
<v Speaker 1>the last couple of weeks. But now we do. We

0:39:58.239 --> 0:40:06.360
<v Speaker 1>have plenty to choose from. When when that's about yourself? Okay,

0:40:06.719 --> 0:40:08.600
<v Speaker 1>so here's do you want my teaser first? You want

0:40:08.840 --> 0:40:13.080
<v Speaker 1>like Bob's teaser first? Thanks very much? All right. I

0:40:13.120 --> 0:40:15.120
<v Speaker 1>actually played a teaser early in the week, but it

0:40:15.239 --> 0:40:17.440
<v Speaker 1>no longer qualifies. I played the Colts when they were

0:40:17.440 --> 0:40:19.040
<v Speaker 1>plus one and a half. On Monday, I took the

0:40:19.080 --> 0:40:23.080
<v Speaker 1>Colts with Seattle. Talking about long teasers plus seven and

0:40:23.080 --> 0:40:25.239
<v Speaker 1>a half each. I'm still gonna use Seattle. They're still

0:40:25.239 --> 0:40:26.919
<v Speaker 1>plus one and a half or two, so I can

0:40:26.960 --> 0:40:28.680
<v Speaker 1>get them at plus seven and a half and they're

0:40:28.719 --> 0:40:33.000
<v Speaker 1>gonna pair them with Chicago on Monday night. Home Dog

0:40:33.440 --> 0:40:35.880
<v Speaker 1>plus eight and a half. You have danced, You have

0:40:36.040 --> 0:40:37.799
<v Speaker 1>used all that. You've danced around and used all the

0:40:38.120 --> 0:40:44.000
<v Speaker 1>all the long teaser legs that I didn't like as much, Todd. Okay,

0:40:44.040 --> 0:40:47.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna take the Bucks down to just win the game.

0:40:49.080 --> 0:40:52.840
<v Speaker 1>Um so Bucks pick them, and I'm gonna take the

0:40:53.000 --> 0:41:00.640
<v Speaker 1>Baltimore Ravens minus one. Okay, I'm going with Buffalo and

0:41:00.680 --> 0:41:05.760
<v Speaker 1>the Chargers. I'm taking the two uh small road dogs

0:41:06.040 --> 0:41:08.120
<v Speaker 1>in their respective games, teasing them up through the three

0:41:08.120 --> 0:41:11.960
<v Speaker 1>and the and the seven. Chargers have lost every single

0:41:12.120 --> 0:41:15.520
<v Speaker 1>game this year by seven points or fewer. I'll happily

0:41:15.560 --> 0:41:17.439
<v Speaker 1>take them up to eight and a half or eight

0:41:17.480 --> 0:41:20.560
<v Speaker 1>whatever it is, uh and play them against the Dolphins.

0:41:20.640 --> 0:41:23.319
<v Speaker 1>Dolphins have been aided by defensive touchdowns the last couple

0:41:23.320 --> 0:41:28.839
<v Speaker 1>of weeks. Unsustainable, that's what that is. Thanks. By the way,

0:41:28.880 --> 0:41:31.719
<v Speaker 1>there's another group you can go to. A l Anonymous

0:41:31.800 --> 0:41:38.200
<v Speaker 1>is another one. Look, yeah, no, but I'll take it ill. Yeah,

0:41:38.200 --> 0:41:43.239
<v Speaker 1>they lose clothes, I'll take the Aaron Shots. Yeah. Aaron

0:41:43.280 --> 0:41:46.080
<v Speaker 1>Shots from Football Outsiders was on a numbers game last week.

0:41:46.080 --> 0:41:47.919
<v Speaker 1>He said, guess who the team is with the most

0:41:47.920 --> 0:41:51.479
<v Speaker 1>consistent performance week after week. It's the Chargers. But because

0:41:51.520 --> 0:41:56.239
<v Speaker 1>they crap it out. What's that the teaser Dream? Yeah,

0:41:56.239 --> 0:41:58.799
<v Speaker 1>they're teaser dream. Chargers are one leg and then I'll

0:41:58.840 --> 0:42:01.680
<v Speaker 1>take Buffalo. Mikey's one of Mikey's best bets. I'll tease

0:42:01.719 --> 0:42:03.839
<v Speaker 1>Buffalo through the three and the seven. I don't think

0:42:03.880 --> 0:42:06.360
<v Speaker 1>Arizona is a team that I expect to blow out Buffalo.

0:42:06.400 --> 0:42:08.160
<v Speaker 1>I think at the very least Buffalo keeps it closed.

0:42:08.160 --> 0:42:11.040
<v Speaker 1>So charges in Buffalo. I two had a dream, and

0:42:11.080 --> 0:42:14.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm taking the Chargers plus eight and a half. When

0:42:14.200 --> 0:42:16.280
<v Speaker 1>they tell the Anthony Lynn story, I think the title

0:42:16.320 --> 0:42:19.280
<v Speaker 1>of it should be at least now you get draft picks.

0:42:19.320 --> 0:42:21.680
<v Speaker 1>And then my other one is the Ravens, who I'm

0:42:21.680 --> 0:42:23.640
<v Speaker 1>going to agree with. Todd teas them down to one.

0:42:23.760 --> 0:42:25.359
<v Speaker 1>I don't hate that at all. By the way, I'm

0:42:25.360 --> 0:42:26.719
<v Speaker 1>sorry to step out of line. It was your turn

0:42:26.760 --> 0:42:30.080
<v Speaker 1>on my turn. There's no turns here. I apologize. Okay,

0:42:30.200 --> 0:42:34.399
<v Speaker 1>we were Oh Survivor, Oh they only one a live? Bob,

0:42:34.440 --> 0:42:36.560
<v Speaker 1>do you play Survivor at all? Wait? Who did you

0:42:36.600 --> 0:42:39.400
<v Speaker 1>end up last? I'm sorry, I was asking Bob a

0:42:39.520 --> 0:42:43.719
<v Speaker 1>question Todd got. I got knocked out last week, and

0:42:43.800 --> 0:42:47.200
<v Speaker 1>I am getting who it was because it was so painful.

0:42:47.239 --> 0:42:49.040
<v Speaker 1>I had it all set up. I'm in a loser's

0:42:49.080 --> 0:42:52.879
<v Speaker 1>pool where you pick a loser each week. Oh that's right, yeah,

0:42:53.040 --> 0:42:55.480
<v Speaker 1>pack them twice. Now, I had it set up. I

0:42:55.520 --> 0:42:57.560
<v Speaker 1>had it so my last two weeks, and it's like

0:42:57.760 --> 0:43:00.440
<v Speaker 1>it's thousands of people on this thing, so you need

0:43:00.480 --> 0:43:03.000
<v Speaker 1>to really plan for the end because it always goes

0:43:03.040 --> 0:43:05.800
<v Speaker 1>down to the end. And I had the Jets and Giants.

0:43:05.840 --> 0:43:09.480
<v Speaker 1>The final two weeks is likely double digit dogs, all

0:43:09.520 --> 0:43:13.839
<v Speaker 1>set up, mapped out, and I lost. I forgot who

0:43:13.840 --> 0:43:17.080
<v Speaker 1>it was. It was brutal. So anyway, I'm out. I

0:43:17.080 --> 0:43:19.400
<v Speaker 1>forgot it was, but I'm out of my loser's pool.

0:43:19.440 --> 0:43:22.400
<v Speaker 1>All right, Todd, what was your point of clarification that tough? No,

0:43:22.480 --> 0:43:24.640
<v Speaker 1>I just I forgot that you had said before that

0:43:24.680 --> 0:43:26.560
<v Speaker 1>you took you ended up because last week you didn't

0:43:26.560 --> 0:43:28.239
<v Speaker 1>tell us who you had, and then you ended up

0:43:28.280 --> 0:43:32.399
<v Speaker 1>with Dallas, so you ended up Pittsburgh. Let's talk about that.

0:43:32.960 --> 0:43:35.200
<v Speaker 1>If Gil gets down to the final three weeks and

0:43:35.239 --> 0:43:36.840
<v Speaker 1>there's a hand for he can't be given out. His

0:43:36.880 --> 0:43:39.759
<v Speaker 1>pick On already said this last week after Thanksgiving. I'm

0:43:39.760 --> 0:43:42.240
<v Speaker 1>not giving him out. You can text us on Saturday

0:43:42.280 --> 0:43:45.280
<v Speaker 1>afternoon or whatever, but that puts you at a disadvantam petitious.

0:43:45.520 --> 0:43:48.799
<v Speaker 1>They already know what I discussion right there. Just jinx him.

0:43:48.800 --> 0:43:53.000
<v Speaker 1>Good job, Mike. I hope gil wins. I got down

0:43:53.000 --> 0:43:55.799
<v Speaker 1>to the final ten in an eight person pool a

0:43:55.800 --> 0:43:59.040
<v Speaker 1>few years back, so I'm a I love survivor. H

0:43:59.480 --> 0:44:01.799
<v Speaker 1>green Bay is not the correct pick to make if

0:44:01.840 --> 0:44:04.000
<v Speaker 1>you're trying to win this thing, you should probably pick

0:44:04.000 --> 0:44:05.840
<v Speaker 1>someone else. But I have a feeling I'm gonna end

0:44:05.880 --> 0:44:07.720
<v Speaker 1>up picking green Bay because that was on my grid.

0:44:07.760 --> 0:44:12.560
<v Speaker 1>That was on my map that I made for the season. Yeah,

0:44:12.600 --> 0:44:15.360
<v Speaker 1>I think I'm just gonna end just There's just have

0:44:15.440 --> 0:44:17.600
<v Speaker 1>many other good options. That's who I had mapped out

0:44:18.440 --> 0:44:21.719
<v Speaker 1>Jacksonville map. If you had the brown still available, would

0:44:21.760 --> 0:44:24.960
<v Speaker 1>you use them this week? No? I would. Green Bay

0:44:25.000 --> 0:44:27.800
<v Speaker 1>is the obvious pick this week. I kept them for

0:44:28.040 --> 0:44:30.520
<v Speaker 1>this week, so more than likely I'm going to use

0:44:30.560 --> 0:44:35.240
<v Speaker 1>them this week. Alright, Final two questions? Are we already there? Wow? Brisk?

0:44:35.680 --> 0:44:39.360
<v Speaker 1>This has been brisk. Not so much showed deference this

0:44:39.520 --> 0:44:44.600
<v Speaker 1>this time around. Quicker. What was the source of that? Remember?

0:44:44.640 --> 0:44:47.120
<v Speaker 1>He said, well, Dr Bob and then he started going

0:44:47.160 --> 0:44:52.960
<v Speaker 1>on about the model. And I'm sure Dr Bob agrees

0:44:53.040 --> 0:44:55.759
<v Speaker 1>with me. Dr Bob knows that that numbers can get

0:44:55.760 --> 0:44:58.640
<v Speaker 1>polluted with dirty numbers based on stupid drives in the

0:44:58.640 --> 0:45:02.040
<v Speaker 1>fourth quarter or a million other are different scenarios, and

0:45:02.080 --> 0:45:06.080
<v Speaker 1>he cleans it up. I take those out, exactly, cleans

0:45:06.080 --> 0:45:09.719
<v Speaker 1>it up. The things you need to be in them.

0:45:10.040 --> 0:45:12.520
<v Speaker 1>I include them. If it's like in Polope, for instance,

0:45:12.800 --> 0:45:15.600
<v Speaker 1>I take out all let's say it's Clemson. I will

0:45:15.640 --> 0:45:18.120
<v Speaker 1>take out their garbage time stats if they're playing a

0:45:18.160 --> 0:45:20.319
<v Speaker 1>team like Notre Dame, and if they're playing a team

0:45:20.280 --> 0:45:22.520
<v Speaker 1>they're favored by twenty eight or more, and I'll reinsort

0:45:22.560 --> 0:45:28.880
<v Speaker 1>them is they're probably gonna have garbage time, right. The

0:45:28.920 --> 0:45:33.600
<v Speaker 1>real affront last year Todd spin this. The real affront

0:45:33.719 --> 0:45:36.919
<v Speaker 1>was when the way he said doctor. Remember he said, well,

0:45:37.400 --> 0:45:41.360
<v Speaker 1>doctor Bob, that's exactly how it was said, which shocked

0:45:42.120 --> 0:45:44.120
<v Speaker 1>not a real doctor. So he had every right to

0:45:44.840 --> 0:45:47.120
<v Speaker 1>say it like that. As as with everything with Todd,

0:45:47.160 --> 0:45:49.799
<v Speaker 1>it's never the content, it's the vehicle with which he

0:45:49.840 --> 0:45:54.439
<v Speaker 1>presents the content. Yes, we didn't like your tone, That's

0:45:54.440 --> 0:45:58.400
<v Speaker 1>what I was. I was not offended, Mike. I have

0:45:58.480 --> 0:46:02.319
<v Speaker 1>a problem with people who you know and get, you know,

0:46:02.600 --> 0:46:05.440
<v Speaker 1>unearned titles. For instance, I know a guy who's a

0:46:05.520 --> 0:46:08.200
<v Speaker 1>vice president of content management doesn't do a great job,

0:46:08.480 --> 0:46:10.799
<v Speaker 1>but it calls himself a vice president. I mean give

0:46:10.880 --> 0:46:14.400
<v Speaker 1>me a rate. I'll tell you what I earned that

0:46:14.560 --> 0:46:18.319
<v Speaker 1>Dr Bob nickname. I was quite the basketball player, and

0:46:18.480 --> 0:46:21.759
<v Speaker 1>I was nicknamed after Dr J. I figured up in

0:46:21.840 --> 0:46:24.840
<v Speaker 1>a minority neighborhood and quite the street game, and I

0:46:25.040 --> 0:46:26.680
<v Speaker 1>my last few years in high school, I moved to

0:46:26.760 --> 0:46:29.239
<v Speaker 1>a pretty much all white sort of neighborhood, and they

0:46:29.320 --> 0:46:31.840
<v Speaker 1>nicknamed me Dr Bob because I played like Dr J.

0:46:32.000 --> 0:46:35.480
<v Speaker 1>They thought, where did you grow up? I grew up

0:46:35.480 --> 0:46:38.680
<v Speaker 1>in balleto the suburb of the East Bay. And in

0:46:38.719 --> 0:46:43.840
<v Speaker 1>the Bay are the mean streets of Leo. Like Tupac

0:46:45.400 --> 0:46:47.480
<v Speaker 1>have a great story. I have a great story for

0:46:47.520 --> 0:46:50.200
<v Speaker 1>you that that is similar to that one. I had

0:46:50.239 --> 0:46:51.880
<v Speaker 1>just moved to l A and I was out playing

0:46:51.880 --> 0:46:54.480
<v Speaker 1>pick up basketball in my neighborhood with nine black guys

0:46:54.480 --> 0:46:57.920
<v Speaker 1>in me and I was the last one, and I

0:46:58.000 --> 0:47:00.719
<v Speaker 1>played really, really well. After a little while, they're like,

0:47:01.040 --> 0:47:04.560
<v Speaker 1>get the bat a, Larry Burn. Okay, we've done, We're

0:47:04.560 --> 0:47:08.440
<v Speaker 1>done here. Where where's the shark? All you? Larry? Starting

0:47:08.480 --> 0:47:11.960
<v Speaker 1>next week? All right, I'm Dr Bob and I earned it,

0:47:12.080 --> 0:47:15.920
<v Speaker 1>You guys done. Todd Winn has survived in French Like

0:47:16.040 --> 0:47:22.920
<v Speaker 1>I'll tell you that right now, he would not have Alright. Finally, questions, Um, first,

0:47:22.960 --> 0:47:25.680
<v Speaker 1>the big favorite, most likely to lose? That right? Green

0:47:25.719 --> 0:47:27.600
<v Speaker 1>Bay thirteen and a half. Well, let's call it thirteen

0:47:27.640 --> 0:47:32.520
<v Speaker 1>point favorites at home against Jacksonville. Uh, there's not many

0:47:32.560 --> 0:47:34.960
<v Speaker 1>candidates here in New Orleans. Maybe you could stay there

0:47:35.160 --> 0:47:38.040
<v Speaker 1>they if the line goes back up, Yeah, let's call

0:47:38.080 --> 0:47:40.440
<v Speaker 1>it Pittsburgh. I know where you're going with this, Bob.

0:47:40.560 --> 0:47:43.439
<v Speaker 1>Pittsburgh north of seven for sure at home if Big

0:47:43.440 --> 0:47:45.759
<v Speaker 1>Ben gets to play here. Uh, we'll see if he's

0:47:45.760 --> 0:47:47.799
<v Speaker 1>cleared from the COVID nineteen reserve. Listen, here's a couple

0:47:47.800 --> 0:47:49.879
<v Speaker 1>more negative tests. They would be north of a seven

0:47:49.880 --> 0:47:53.640
<v Speaker 1>point favorite home against Cincinnati, New Orleans nine point favorites

0:47:53.640 --> 0:47:57.359
<v Speaker 1>home against San Francisco, Baltimore seven point favorites on the

0:47:57.520 --> 0:48:00.239
<v Speaker 1>road against New England. Who's the most likely to lose?

0:48:00.280 --> 0:48:02.120
<v Speaker 1>Out right? And I know the answer, Bob, I can

0:48:02.120 --> 0:48:06.040
<v Speaker 1>guess your answer. Well, I went against Pittsburgh last week

0:48:06.080 --> 0:48:08.040
<v Speaker 1>as a best bet on Dallas and that was an

0:48:08.080 --> 0:48:10.880
<v Speaker 1>easy winner. And I've been on Cincinnati quite a few times.

0:48:11.000 --> 0:48:14.799
<v Speaker 1>Is your first some winners? Um, I think Cincinnati has

0:48:14.840 --> 0:48:17.839
<v Speaker 1>a decent chance to beat Pittsburgh. I think you're right,

0:48:17.880 --> 0:48:19.440
<v Speaker 1>and I think Cincinnati would have been one of my

0:48:19.480 --> 0:48:25.280
<v Speaker 1>best bets if we had a number here. Todd uh bad, biggest.

0:48:26.080 --> 0:48:29.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't know who. How do you pick? Who were

0:48:29.040 --> 0:48:34.680
<v Speaker 1>the choices against Packers and Steelers? I guess or those

0:48:35.040 --> 0:48:38.880
<v Speaker 1>choices Baltimore. I guess I'll take the Bengals too. I

0:48:38.880 --> 0:48:40.560
<v Speaker 1>don't think they're going to beat the Steelers, but I'll

0:48:40.600 --> 0:48:42.399
<v Speaker 1>I guess I'll take them. That's what I would take, Mike,

0:48:43.520 --> 0:48:47.640
<v Speaker 1>can we use this, uh the Tampa Bay game? No, Well,

0:48:47.640 --> 0:48:49.680
<v Speaker 1>that's not one of the choices. It's too low. What

0:48:49.800 --> 0:48:52.000
<v Speaker 1>you would say Tampa Bay though? Six though, Yeah, but

0:48:52.120 --> 0:48:54.200
<v Speaker 1>there's not many choices here this week it was it

0:48:54.239 --> 0:48:56.680
<v Speaker 1>was teetering. I would take if the Steelers are back up,

0:48:56.719 --> 0:48:58.400
<v Speaker 1>the Steelers, I would do the same thing you would do.

0:48:58.560 --> 0:49:00.080
<v Speaker 1>I would take Tampa Bay if that does include it.

0:49:00.080 --> 0:49:02.279
<v Speaker 1>But I'll take this dealer. By the way, Dr Bob,

0:49:02.320 --> 0:49:04.919
<v Speaker 1>I gotta tell you one other thing I found out

0:49:04.920 --> 0:49:07.840
<v Speaker 1>about you in two thousand six. I remember where I was.

0:49:08.000 --> 0:49:11.239
<v Speaker 1>I remember there was like a gambling board and this

0:49:11.440 --> 0:49:14.040
<v Speaker 1>doctor Bob guy kept There was a whole controversy with

0:49:14.080 --> 0:49:16.839
<v Speaker 1>this doctor Bob guy. Dr Bobby's this awesome guy, blah

0:49:16.920 --> 0:49:19.480
<v Speaker 1>blah blah. And I remember thinking when I was sitting there,

0:49:19.920 --> 0:49:21.839
<v Speaker 1>it would be so fun to go work with this guy.

0:49:21.840 --> 0:49:24.320
<v Speaker 1>At the time, I was doing really well selling life insurance.

0:49:24.600 --> 0:49:27.719
<v Speaker 1>And then I meet my brother from another mother, Gil Alexander,

0:49:28.040 --> 0:49:31.840
<v Speaker 1>years later, and he tells me from another mother, what

0:49:31.920 --> 0:49:34.839
<v Speaker 1>did you say, my brother from another mother? And I've

0:49:34.880 --> 0:49:39.160
<v Speaker 1>told him that that's right, my brother. Now I didn't

0:49:39.640 --> 0:49:43.400
<v Speaker 1>I didn't need to. I sorry. I just thought. I

0:49:43.480 --> 0:49:45.600
<v Speaker 1>just thought it was so funny because me and Gil

0:49:45.640 --> 0:49:49.239
<v Speaker 1>had such interesting, very similar experiences growing up. And then

0:49:49.560 --> 0:49:52.040
<v Speaker 1>when I had heard of you, I was thinking, Wow,

0:49:52.080 --> 0:49:54.200
<v Speaker 1>this Dr Bob would be a great guy to work with.

0:49:54.520 --> 0:49:56.520
<v Speaker 1>And then I find out Gil ended up working with you.

0:49:56.600 --> 0:49:58.600
<v Speaker 1>Was like it was almost like some alter ego kind

0:49:58.640 --> 0:50:00.960
<v Speaker 1>of weird deal. I've you know that he actually had

0:50:01.000 --> 0:50:02.839
<v Speaker 1>worked with you. I think I probably read the same

0:50:02.880 --> 0:50:05.480
<v Speaker 1>thing you did about Bob at that time, and I

0:50:05.600 --> 0:50:08.319
<v Speaker 1>knew from that Bob lived in San Francisco somewhere too,

0:50:08.320 --> 0:50:09.680
<v Speaker 1>so I was always at that time, I was like,

0:50:09.680 --> 0:50:11.920
<v Speaker 1>I wonder where he lives. It turns out he lived

0:50:11.960 --> 0:50:20.439
<v Speaker 1>right over the hill, right over there. Hill. I'm sorry,

0:50:20.520 --> 0:50:24.640
<v Speaker 1>Dr Bob go ahead, though, so I did. I only

0:50:24.640 --> 0:50:28.320
<v Speaker 1>saw gil what I decided I wanted to see. That

0:50:28.560 --> 0:50:30.919
<v Speaker 1>is a lot. God, what was the controversy you said?

0:50:30.920 --> 0:50:33.799
<v Speaker 1>There was a big controversy over Dr Bob, this great guy,

0:50:33.880 --> 0:50:38.239
<v Speaker 1>Dr Bob. So I was remember I remember reading some

0:50:38.440 --> 0:50:41.319
<v Speaker 1>like Internet boards. This was back in two thousand and six,

0:50:41.360 --> 0:50:43.800
<v Speaker 1>and there was this whole Doctor Bob was like killing

0:50:43.800 --> 0:50:47.239
<v Speaker 1>it and releasing games on Thursdays in college and the

0:50:47.640 --> 0:50:50.640
<v Speaker 1>lines would move, and then people were all screaming, oh,

0:50:50.760 --> 0:50:53.440
<v Speaker 1>Dr Bob's not that great and blah blah blah. Meanwhile

0:50:53.480 --> 0:50:55.359
<v Speaker 1>you were killing it and moving all the lines all

0:50:55.360 --> 0:50:58.600
<v Speaker 1>over the place, and I just remember reading a whole.

0:50:59.000 --> 0:51:01.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't even know what the controversy was. I just

0:51:01.120 --> 0:51:03.880
<v Speaker 1>remember the first he was people thought it was like

0:51:03.960 --> 0:51:07.320
<v Speaker 1>some Chinese syndicate or something like that moving all the lines.

0:51:07.360 --> 0:51:11.000
<v Speaker 1>And um, at that time, the lines would move literally

0:51:11.040 --> 0:51:13.359
<v Speaker 1>two and a half to three points every single game.

0:51:14.280 --> 0:51:16.160
<v Speaker 1>And I had a year two thousand five it hit

0:51:16.200 --> 0:51:20.960
<v Speaker 1>seventy percent in college football. Um, it was it was

0:51:21.000 --> 0:51:22.880
<v Speaker 1>easy back then. That was the first few years that

0:51:22.960 --> 0:51:25.520
<v Speaker 1>my model was. After I programmed the model that I

0:51:25.560 --> 0:51:27.120
<v Speaker 1>was doing by hand for years. It was the first

0:51:27.400 --> 0:51:31.040
<v Speaker 1>couple of years after I had a programmed and automated

0:51:31.280 --> 0:51:33.600
<v Speaker 1>and it's just it was sucked it in and that thing.

0:51:33.920 --> 0:51:37.279
<v Speaker 1>We're three years of sixty winners in college football at

0:51:37.200 --> 0:51:40.040
<v Speaker 1>a three year span. That's how. That's how, that's how

0:51:40.120 --> 0:51:44.600
<v Speaker 1>Physik won his college football competition. To use my picks, Bob,

0:51:44.680 --> 0:51:47.200
<v Speaker 1>didn't you have to go to a time to you

0:51:47.239 --> 0:51:50.799
<v Speaker 1>had to adjust your release on a time or didn't

0:51:50.840 --> 0:51:53.120
<v Speaker 1>you have to like ad just because of that? Yeah,

0:51:53.120 --> 0:51:54.600
<v Speaker 1>I used to. I used to send him out on

0:51:54.719 --> 0:51:57.160
<v Speaker 1>email at ten o'clock on Thursdays every week, and some

0:51:57.160 --> 0:51:59.480
<v Speaker 1>people get their emails at different times, and then they

0:51:59.520 --> 0:52:02.480
<v Speaker 1>started playing. By the time I get my email, the

0:52:02.600 --> 0:52:04.800
<v Speaker 1>lines have moved and I was like, oh jeez, I'm

0:52:04.800 --> 0:52:06.000
<v Speaker 1>not gonna do here. So I had a tie. I

0:52:06.000 --> 0:52:07.760
<v Speaker 1>had to set up a time or on my website

0:52:07.920 --> 0:52:10.080
<v Speaker 1>or with a countdown and release one play at a

0:52:10.160 --> 0:52:13.440
<v Speaker 1>time so people could count down to zero, they refreshed

0:52:13.480 --> 0:52:17.000
<v Speaker 1>the page, they bet the game. Uh, then three minutes

0:52:17.120 --> 0:52:19.680
<v Speaker 1>later the next the time or reset for three minutes

0:52:19.719 --> 0:52:22.799
<v Speaker 1>and then the next game would be released. And it

0:52:22.800 --> 0:52:25.239
<v Speaker 1>became a big headache. Honestly, I mean people think, oh,

0:52:25.239 --> 0:52:26.759
<v Speaker 1>it's great, you move lines, and I'm like, no, it's

0:52:26.760 --> 0:52:29.560
<v Speaker 1>a pain in the ass because I have to It's

0:52:29.560 --> 0:52:31.239
<v Speaker 1>a constraint that I have to deal with, Like I

0:52:31.280 --> 0:52:34.160
<v Speaker 1>have to have set up, you know, specific times to

0:52:34.239 --> 0:52:36.799
<v Speaker 1>release games so my clients are ready for it, and

0:52:37.200 --> 0:52:39.200
<v Speaker 1>or I have to text five minutes in advance at

0:52:39.200 --> 0:52:41.640
<v Speaker 1>a place coming. I can't just release the play whenever

0:52:41.680 --> 0:52:44.000
<v Speaker 1>I want, which is a constraint that I have to

0:52:44.000 --> 0:52:45.839
<v Speaker 1>deal with because of it. So it's not it's more

0:52:45.840 --> 0:52:47.480
<v Speaker 1>of a purse and a blessing. I'll tell you that.

0:52:48.400 --> 0:52:50.719
<v Speaker 1>By the way, it just reminded me of Arizona State

0:52:50.840 --> 0:52:53.680
<v Speaker 1>USC when he was talking about those college football games,

0:52:53.719 --> 0:52:55.560
<v Speaker 1>because back in two thousands six, I had a crazy

0:52:55.640 --> 0:52:58.000
<v Speaker 1>situation with them, and then of course at them Kipper

0:52:58.040 --> 0:53:00.000
<v Speaker 1>massacre and then I don't know if you guys were

0:53:00.000 --> 0:53:03.000
<v Speaker 1>watching USC Arizona State this week, but I ended up

0:53:03.040 --> 0:53:06.759
<v Speaker 1>losing that one in another ridiculous fashion. Did you guys

0:53:06.800 --> 0:53:08.680
<v Speaker 1>see what happened at the end of that game, how

0:53:08.719 --> 0:53:12.200
<v Speaker 1>Herman Edwards blew the game? It was unbelievable. It's there's

0:53:12.239 --> 0:53:15.600
<v Speaker 1>something about that because when you the first down and

0:53:15.680 --> 0:53:18.560
<v Speaker 1>sit on it. Yeah, and then of course they give

0:53:18.640 --> 0:53:21.680
<v Speaker 1>up the The onside kick is just like, It's just incredible.

0:53:21.680 --> 0:53:26.160
<v Speaker 1>Herm Edwards is another guy. He plays to lose the game,

0:53:26.680 --> 0:53:30.480
<v Speaker 1>like Anthony, and he's like Anthony Lynn Jr. Does recruit

0:53:30.520 --> 0:53:33.000
<v Speaker 1>well and he is a solid coach, not a great

0:53:33.040 --> 0:53:35.360
<v Speaker 1>game manager. You're right, but I'd rather have him than

0:53:35.360 --> 0:53:37.399
<v Speaker 1>a lot of guys who manage games better but can't

0:53:37.400 --> 0:53:41.640
<v Speaker 1>recruit as well. Final question, Guys, we play in a

0:53:41.680 --> 0:53:45.200
<v Speaker 1>bizarro world. We bet in a bizarro world where we're

0:53:45.239 --> 0:53:47.480
<v Speaker 1>forced to bet a side on every single game, but

0:53:47.520 --> 0:53:50.880
<v Speaker 1>we're allowed one free pass. Again, fourteen games in the NFL,

0:53:50.920 --> 0:53:53.960
<v Speaker 1>including tonight's you got a bet thirteen of them. What's

0:53:54.000 --> 0:53:55.719
<v Speaker 1>the game you want no part of? Now? There is

0:53:55.920 --> 0:54:00.759
<v Speaker 1>no line currently Cincinnati Pittsburgh for why in Detroit? And

0:54:00.800 --> 0:54:02.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure if Baltimore is back on the board either.

0:54:02.760 --> 0:54:07.080
<v Speaker 1>Baltimore had a COVID positive tonight to um. But if

0:54:07.120 --> 0:54:09.480
<v Speaker 1>you could pass on one game on the side, Bob,

0:54:09.480 --> 0:54:12.880
<v Speaker 1>what's the game you want no part of? Buffalo Arizona?

0:54:14.080 --> 0:54:18.560
<v Speaker 1>I just these teams are pretty evenly mashed. My model

0:54:18.760 --> 0:54:24.280
<v Speaker 1>favors Arizona by one point nine of spreads to both

0:54:24.280 --> 0:54:30.560
<v Speaker 1>teams are in like negative situations let down situations. Um, yeah,

0:54:30.600 --> 0:54:33.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't want any part of that game. I think

0:54:33.120 --> 0:54:35.040
<v Speaker 1>it's complete toss up. You know that Bob and I

0:54:35.120 --> 0:54:37.840
<v Speaker 1>hold the consecutive days record of eating Thai food in

0:54:37.880 --> 0:54:41.200
<v Speaker 1>San Francisco. Oh I wish that was the case. We

0:54:41.239 --> 0:54:43.759
<v Speaker 1>have that record, Todd, what do you want no part

0:54:43.760 --> 0:54:46.800
<v Speaker 1>of I don't want any part of Seattle l A Rams.

0:54:47.040 --> 0:54:50.080
<v Speaker 1>I cannot understand who the l A Rams are except

0:54:50.160 --> 0:54:52.960
<v Speaker 1>for the fact they have a quarterback who's vastly overpaid.

0:54:53.520 --> 0:54:56.360
<v Speaker 1>Who knows what's going to show up this week? Seattle

0:54:56.400 --> 0:54:59.440
<v Speaker 1>has no defense, granted, but I just I don't know

0:54:59.480 --> 0:55:02.040
<v Speaker 1>what you with the Rams. Every week it's something different.

0:55:02.080 --> 0:55:04.560
<v Speaker 1>So I'm off that game. Yeah, I don't. I don't

0:55:04.600 --> 0:55:06.960
<v Speaker 1>hate that pick. I agree with Todd. Yeah, the Rams

0:55:07.000 --> 0:55:09.480
<v Speaker 1>their team. You only can end game. You have to

0:55:09.480 --> 0:55:12.200
<v Speaker 1>watch them play the first quarter and decide what what

0:55:12.400 --> 0:55:15.000
<v Speaker 1>goffs mood is going to be and how his body

0:55:15.040 --> 0:55:17.000
<v Speaker 1>languages and if he's looking down the field or if

0:55:17.040 --> 0:55:19.239
<v Speaker 1>he's got his eyes glued to the ground. So I

0:55:19.520 --> 0:55:21.200
<v Speaker 1>want no part of it. When is Carroll ever going

0:55:21.239 --> 0:55:23.759
<v Speaker 1>to get his feet held to the fire for how

0:55:23.800 --> 0:55:26.160
<v Speaker 1>bad this defense? He's a defensive coach. I talked to

0:55:26.200 --> 0:55:29.600
<v Speaker 1>Lombardi about that yesterday, because he's a Carol guy. He like,

0:55:29.640 --> 0:55:31.440
<v Speaker 1>he thinks Carrol's one of the all time greats. Yeah,

0:55:31.480 --> 0:55:33.040
<v Speaker 1>he's like, when he gets credit for Legion of Boom,

0:55:33.040 --> 0:55:35.319
<v Speaker 1>why doesn't he not get credit for this? And I

0:55:35.320 --> 0:55:38.600
<v Speaker 1>don't remember the answer. I don't I don't remember the answer.

0:55:38.640 --> 0:55:41.240
<v Speaker 1>I was off to the next one he said. He said,

0:55:42.160 --> 0:55:45.040
<v Speaker 1>Carol needs to get more involved in the defense because

0:55:45.080 --> 0:55:46.960
<v Speaker 1>he can point to his trophy and the players will

0:55:46.960 --> 0:55:50.400
<v Speaker 1>buy in where Nagy can't. The question was about Naggie

0:55:50.400 --> 0:55:52.879
<v Speaker 1>Carroll and right was he also though when he got

0:55:52.920 --> 0:55:55.000
<v Speaker 1>when he had guys like Chancellor and all those guys

0:55:55.000 --> 0:55:56.960
<v Speaker 1>in the Legion of Boom, was he so close to

0:55:57.000 --> 0:55:59.720
<v Speaker 1>his college years that he knew those guys were gems

0:56:00.320 --> 0:56:02.080
<v Speaker 1>and so it was like a Jimmy Johnson thing where

0:56:02.080 --> 0:56:04.480
<v Speaker 1>he knew the better players. And then it's just sort

0:56:04.480 --> 0:56:07.560
<v Speaker 1>of this one stretch of very interesting point. I don't know.

0:56:08.080 --> 0:56:10.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. Is Philip Rivers a Hall of Famer

0:56:10.840 --> 0:56:14.320
<v Speaker 1>according to you guys this question? What about Warren Mode

0:56:15.000 --> 0:56:18.160
<v Speaker 1>I would say I would say Horror Moon, yes, Philip Rivers, No,

0:56:19.719 --> 0:56:22.880
<v Speaker 1>Dr Bob, I love this. Dr Bob go, Dr Bob.

0:56:23.000 --> 0:56:30.120
<v Speaker 1>Philip Rivers that background good not great quarterbacks in the

0:56:30.160 --> 0:56:33.239
<v Speaker 1>Hall of Fame because they played for seventeen or eighteen years. Yeah,

0:56:33.280 --> 0:56:36.680
<v Speaker 1>this isn't Craig Bigio in baseball. Manning should not get

0:56:36.719 --> 0:56:39.080
<v Speaker 1>in either for winning two games. Other than that he

0:56:39.160 --> 0:56:42.360
<v Speaker 1>was mediocre his entire career. He's like the definition of

0:56:42.400 --> 0:56:45.960
<v Speaker 1>MEDIOCRELI Manning. People like, oh, he's a sure fire Hall

0:56:45.960 --> 0:56:47.840
<v Speaker 1>of Famer. I'm like, hall of famer? Are we talking

0:56:47.880 --> 0:56:50.520
<v Speaker 1>about the Hall of Fame for people to throw interceptions?

0:56:50.520 --> 0:56:52.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean, what are we talking about? Well, he's won

0:56:52.200 --> 0:56:54.439
<v Speaker 1>one more Super Bowl than tread Dilfer, one more Super

0:56:54.480 --> 0:56:56.399
<v Speaker 1>Bowl than Mark Ripping, and no one's talking about them

0:56:56.400 --> 0:56:57.719
<v Speaker 1>in the Hall of Fame. So like, why would he

0:56:57.800 --> 0:57:00.680
<v Speaker 1>like just be on that he wasn't He wasn't even

0:57:00.840 --> 0:57:03.520
<v Speaker 1>a very good quarterback, that's right, But he's right down

0:57:03.520 --> 0:57:05.920
<v Speaker 1>the middle is wins and losses. By the way, my

0:57:05.920 --> 0:57:07.759
<v Speaker 1>pick if anyone cares with Seattle in the rams. But

0:57:08.160 --> 0:57:10.360
<v Speaker 1>we always agree on that, but we don't always have

0:57:10.400 --> 0:57:15.239
<v Speaker 1>the same game. Um, I think Philip Rivers is not

0:57:15.520 --> 0:57:17.400
<v Speaker 1>like I don't think you can apply the same rules

0:57:17.440 --> 0:57:19.640
<v Speaker 1>to to football that you can in baseball. Right, So

0:57:19.720 --> 0:57:22.640
<v Speaker 1>Craig Bigio gets in the Hall of Fame because he's

0:57:22.680 --> 0:57:25.840
<v Speaker 1>just played long enough where he accumulates counting stats and

0:57:25.840 --> 0:57:27.680
<v Speaker 1>then people are like, oh, well he had that many hits,

0:57:27.720 --> 0:57:29.480
<v Speaker 1>so you're in. I don't think you can do that

0:57:29.520 --> 0:57:32.720
<v Speaker 1>in football. So I would say no, But there's a

0:57:32.760 --> 0:57:34.720
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of people think, yes, baseball is the

0:57:34.800 --> 0:57:37.400
<v Speaker 1>numbers game. Is the Hall of Fame? The numbers game?

0:57:38.000 --> 0:57:40.720
<v Speaker 1>It's the numbers game. How is Dan Hampton in the

0:57:40.720 --> 0:57:44.720
<v Speaker 1>Hall of Fame? So many guys? How's Dan his pants

0:57:44.760 --> 0:57:47.800
<v Speaker 1>higher than any other player in the Nashual Football League history?

0:57:47.840 --> 0:57:53.400
<v Speaker 1>All right, Dr Bob, do you allies baseball as well? No?

0:57:54.920 --> 0:57:57.000
<v Speaker 1>I do not. That was effort is I've left that

0:57:57.120 --> 0:58:00.480
<v Speaker 1>to other people over the years. I have am I

0:58:00.560 --> 0:58:02.640
<v Speaker 1>might dig into it again, but if I do, I

0:58:02.640 --> 0:58:04.920
<v Speaker 1>i'd probably consult some people who are handicapped before I

0:58:04.920 --> 0:58:07.160
<v Speaker 1>start programming it. So no, but I don't see any

0:58:07.160 --> 0:58:10.040
<v Speaker 1>reason to I didn't. I did baseball for Bob. Some

0:58:10.160 --> 0:58:13.240
<v Speaker 1>years were wildly awesome and some some years were wildly terrible.

0:58:13.560 --> 0:58:17.000
<v Speaker 1>But by the end of the run, we had this

0:58:17.040 --> 0:58:18.920
<v Speaker 1>thing where it's like, well, no, you just have to

0:58:19.680 --> 0:58:22.120
<v Speaker 1>you have to give the picks that the day before, well,

0:58:22.160 --> 0:58:25.920
<v Speaker 1>the market had evolved. You can't. You couldn't do that anymore.

0:58:26.080 --> 0:58:28.280
<v Speaker 1>There was no way. And you're still getting judged for

0:58:28.320 --> 0:58:30.000
<v Speaker 1>your record from the night before. It's like, come on,

0:58:30.320 --> 0:58:32.800
<v Speaker 1>I can't do that today. It's impossible. You don't even

0:58:32.840 --> 0:58:34.960
<v Speaker 1>know what the openers and that you have no idea

0:58:35.000 --> 0:58:42.680
<v Speaker 1>what you can't do it? Yeah, do you bet in game? No? I? Um, well,

0:58:42.720 --> 0:58:46.120
<v Speaker 1>on Saturday's is my only day off. I don't do that.

0:58:46.280 --> 0:58:49.200
<v Speaker 1>And on Sundays I'm working on the next week's college

0:58:49.200 --> 0:58:51.760
<v Speaker 1>football and not really paying attention to what's going on

0:58:51.880 --> 0:58:53.840
<v Speaker 1>in the games, except you know, the end of the games.

0:58:53.840 --> 0:58:56.520
<v Speaker 1>I tune into the to the red Zone channel. That's

0:58:56.600 --> 0:58:58.520
<v Speaker 1>That's about it. But I I've had too much work

0:58:58.560 --> 0:59:00.640
<v Speaker 1>on Sunday's working on college football for the next week.

0:59:00.680 --> 0:59:05.880
<v Speaker 1>So are you doing college basketball this year? Bob? Yeah,

0:59:06.280 --> 0:59:08.760
<v Speaker 1>uh yeah, yeah, I'm spending gonna spend less time on

0:59:08.800 --> 0:59:11.200
<v Speaker 1>it because I put everything. There's a new model that

0:59:11.280 --> 0:59:14.360
<v Speaker 1>we have that I work have a data base. Math

0:59:14.440 --> 0:59:16.680
<v Speaker 1>guy who's a is a young genius, and I've been

0:59:16.680 --> 0:59:19.640
<v Speaker 1>working with him. We worked on the NFL model that

0:59:19.680 --> 0:59:22.480
<v Speaker 1>we're currently using together. And UM, he does all the

0:59:22.760 --> 0:59:27.720
<v Speaker 1>nitty gritty, behind the scenes player you know, player work

0:59:27.800 --> 0:59:29.680
<v Speaker 1>on that, which is very helpful. And I worked on

0:59:29.720 --> 0:59:33.960
<v Speaker 1>college football mostly um and we worked on a college

0:59:33.960 --> 0:59:38.480
<v Speaker 1>basketball model, which mostly was was his doing. I injected

0:59:38.520 --> 0:59:40.040
<v Speaker 1>the kind of things that I thought we should look at,

0:59:40.080 --> 0:59:43.240
<v Speaker 1>and and we we have a model that we think

0:59:43.280 --> 0:59:45.640
<v Speaker 1>it's really really good with really great priors, which is

0:59:45.640 --> 0:59:48.120
<v Speaker 1>the key to a good a good college basketball model.

0:59:48.640 --> 0:59:51.800
<v Speaker 1>We we we used two thousand four to two thousand

0:59:51.880 --> 0:59:54.800
<v Speaker 1>fifteen data and built the model as if we were

0:59:54.880 --> 0:59:57.840
<v Speaker 1>entering the two thousand sixteen season. Then we ran it

0:59:57.880 --> 0:59:59.880
<v Speaker 1>on the next four years and it tested out over

1:00:00.000 --> 1:00:05.080
<v Speaker 1>fift on games, which was much much better than we expected.

1:00:05.160 --> 1:00:08.680
<v Speaker 1>We were expecting fifty four fifty four and a half percent.

1:00:09.280 --> 1:00:12.080
<v Speaker 1>And this is without adjusting for players or anything. It

1:00:12.160 --> 1:00:14.000
<v Speaker 1>was just here's what the models should be. When we

1:00:14.080 --> 1:00:19.280
<v Speaker 1>ran it for the next four years, and it was

1:00:20.720 --> 1:00:22.800
<v Speaker 1>it was yeah, and we're really and we're gonna release

1:00:22.880 --> 1:00:24.600
<v Speaker 1>games in the morning, which I've done the last few

1:00:24.680 --> 1:00:28.160
<v Speaker 1>years with success, is releasing college basketball games at six

1:00:28.200 --> 1:00:31.440
<v Speaker 1>thirty in the morning, specific time before before the limits

1:00:31.480 --> 1:00:34.600
<v Speaker 1>go up too much where the syndicates hit him. Um,

1:00:34.640 --> 1:00:37.320
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, it's it tested way better than we thought.

1:00:37.360 --> 1:00:39.120
<v Speaker 1>So I'm excited about it. So I will be working

1:00:39.160 --> 1:00:41.280
<v Speaker 1>on it, but not doing all nighters three or four

1:00:41.320 --> 1:00:43.920
<v Speaker 1>times a week because now a lot of things automated.

1:00:43.960 --> 1:00:45.840
<v Speaker 1>So I'm really excited about it. That's become a big

1:00:45.840 --> 1:00:48.320
<v Speaker 1>deal in college basketball, and Boston were rant on my

1:00:48.360 --> 1:00:50.200
<v Speaker 1>show about that all the time. He's like, He's like,

1:00:50.280 --> 1:00:53.040
<v Speaker 1>you can't syndic kates are coming in and just grabbing

1:00:53.080 --> 1:00:55.640
<v Speaker 1>at all. It's a big source of big thorn in

1:00:55.680 --> 1:00:57.680
<v Speaker 1>his side. He likes to say there's two sides to

1:00:57.680 --> 1:00:59.680
<v Speaker 1>every story, but that was his opinion on that. So

1:00:59.720 --> 1:01:02.680
<v Speaker 1>I know that's a big deal. UMM. In the college basketball,

1:01:02.680 --> 1:01:04.040
<v Speaker 1>do you ever see can I ask one of the

1:01:04.120 --> 1:01:07.880
<v Speaker 1>quick questions go ahead in the in the college basketball,

1:01:07.920 --> 1:01:10.880
<v Speaker 1>do you ever see situations like with Gonzaga last year

1:01:11.200 --> 1:01:14.000
<v Speaker 1>where they just couldn't make the line high enough because

1:01:14.360 --> 1:01:20.840
<v Speaker 1>in a sense, they're breaking the numerical um expectations because

1:01:20.880 --> 1:01:22.880
<v Speaker 1>of the fact that they play so different, like they

1:01:22.880 --> 1:01:25.320
<v Speaker 1>could make loyal a merrymount even run, you know what

1:01:25.360 --> 1:01:27.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean. Do you see that kind of thing where

1:01:27.720 --> 1:01:32.360
<v Speaker 1>it like breaks the model with certain teams, Um, I

1:01:32.400 --> 1:01:34.840
<v Speaker 1>did pretty well. Well, here's the thing with Gonzaga. Yeah,

1:01:34.840 --> 1:01:37.520
<v Speaker 1>I get what you're saying, because you're gonna most models

1:01:37.560 --> 1:01:41.960
<v Speaker 1>will regress their performance down a little bit. But I

1:01:42.040 --> 1:01:45.840
<v Speaker 1>also no, yep, So for just for the model's sake,

1:01:45.920 --> 1:01:48.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't think I would have been on Gonzaga that often.

1:01:48.520 --> 1:01:50.480
<v Speaker 1>But I also did not go against them because I know,

1:01:50.880 --> 1:01:53.440
<v Speaker 1>as a favorite of twenty five or more, whatever the

1:01:53.520 --> 1:01:56.560
<v Speaker 1>number is for them, they cover the spread seventy or

1:01:56.600 --> 1:01:59.480
<v Speaker 1>seven the time generally, so as big fairs usually crush.

1:02:00.440 --> 1:02:02.760
<v Speaker 1>So even so, if my math was against them, or

1:02:02.840 --> 1:02:06.080
<v Speaker 1>my model was against Gonzaga as a big fair, I

1:02:06.160 --> 1:02:09.440
<v Speaker 1>just passed on. But I was talking about the totals actually,

1:02:09.480 --> 1:02:12.320
<v Speaker 1>because the totals last year. I I don't really get

1:02:12.320 --> 1:02:14.080
<v Speaker 1>into totals too much. We're going to you know that

1:02:14.240 --> 1:02:18.040
<v Speaker 1>this model was built, Yeah, size and totals. It projects

1:02:18.080 --> 1:02:22.720
<v Speaker 1>efficiencies offensive and defensive going forward. But we didn't back

1:02:22.800 --> 1:02:25.400
<v Speaker 1>tested on totals because I didn't have data going back

1:02:25.440 --> 1:02:28.200
<v Speaker 1>that far. So we're gonna do it. So I didn't

1:02:28.240 --> 1:02:30.400
<v Speaker 1>really do totals last year either for that, you know,

1:02:30.440 --> 1:02:33.960
<v Speaker 1>for the same kind of reason, because Gonzaga last year.

1:02:34.000 --> 1:02:36.560
<v Speaker 1>It was ridiculous. It was like Seattle this year in

1:02:36.600 --> 1:02:39.560
<v Speaker 1>football or Tampa Bay last year, and in football it

1:02:39.600 --> 1:02:42.920
<v Speaker 1>was just it didn't matter what they made the number

1:02:42.960 --> 1:02:47.760
<v Speaker 1>because Gonzaga was going to break the expectation. Right, So

1:02:47.840 --> 1:02:50.800
<v Speaker 1>they're if they're total eight points the game odds makers

1:02:50.800 --> 1:02:52.520
<v Speaker 1>they were like, all right, one sixty five or one

1:02:52.600 --> 1:02:55.160
<v Speaker 1>seventy one, seventy five one, and it's just they're still

1:02:55.160 --> 1:03:00.680
<v Speaker 1>gonna be one ninety or one eight or whatever it is. Yeah, anyways, Yeah,

1:03:00.680 --> 1:03:06.560
<v Speaker 1>that's super interesting stuff. But sorry, Gil you always very interesting. Um,

1:03:06.680 --> 1:03:09.040
<v Speaker 1>always interesting. I could have talked to Bob for hours

1:03:09.040 --> 1:03:11.439
<v Speaker 1>about it, could talk for more, but we gotta run

1:03:12.080 --> 1:03:14.560
<v Speaker 1>NFL Week number ten. Thank you, Bob, appreciate it. Good

1:03:14.560 --> 1:03:17.280
<v Speaker 1>to see your face, man, Good to see you guys.

1:03:17.400 --> 1:03:20.200
<v Speaker 1>And good luck this weekend, yes sir, good luck to

1:03:20.240 --> 1:03:22.880
<v Speaker 1>everybody a week ten picks in the NFL Fade or follow.

1:03:22.920 --> 1:03:34.680
<v Speaker 1>We got a lot of oppos today