WEBVTT - Twitter's Content Moderation and Expedia's Earnings

0:00:02.000 --> 0:00:05.360
<v Speaker 1>From the heart of where innovation, money and power callive

0:00:06.120 --> 0:00:10.640
<v Speaker 1>in Silicon Valley and beyond. This is Bloomberg Technology with

0:00:10.680 --> 0:00:27.520
<v Speaker 1>Emily Jay. I'memily check in San Francisco, and this is

0:00:27.520 --> 0:00:31.760
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Technology. Coming up in the next hour. Twitter begins layoffs,

0:00:31.800 --> 0:00:35.120
<v Speaker 1>reportedly cutting the PR team from roughly ninety people to

0:00:35.280 --> 0:00:38.800
<v Speaker 1>just two and more, and Musk says the company is

0:00:38.840 --> 0:00:42.800
<v Speaker 1>under stress from a massive drop in revenue as advertisers

0:00:42.880 --> 0:00:46.840
<v Speaker 1>hit pause. Plus Expedience CEO joins us to talk about

0:00:46.840 --> 0:00:50.120
<v Speaker 1>the travel rebound and plans to take on Airbnb after

0:00:50.159 --> 0:00:53.560
<v Speaker 1>reporting record revenue. Will I keep up in a recession?

0:00:54.840 --> 0:00:58.120
<v Speaker 1>And Bloomberg analyze more than one million tweets and Facebook

0:00:58.120 --> 0:01:00.960
<v Speaker 1>posts from hundreds of midterm elections candidates who said they

0:01:01.000 --> 0:01:05.800
<v Speaker 1>believed somewhat or fully that the election was stolen from

0:01:05.840 --> 0:01:09.200
<v Speaker 1>former President Trump. Turns out, amplification of the so called

0:01:09.200 --> 0:01:13.440
<v Speaker 1>big lie on social media drives engagement. We're gonna get

0:01:13.440 --> 0:01:14.720
<v Speaker 1>to all of that in a moment, but first I

0:01:14.720 --> 0:01:16.319
<v Speaker 1>want to get to Twitter now and the slow of

0:01:16.360 --> 0:01:20.320
<v Speaker 1>companies pulling their advertising from the platform. Bloomberg's Alex Barrinka

0:01:20.480 --> 0:01:23.119
<v Speaker 1>has been following it all for us, so Alex Elon

0:01:23.200 --> 0:01:25.480
<v Speaker 1>Musk has said there's been a massive drop in revenue.

0:01:26.000 --> 0:01:31.480
<v Speaker 1>He blames it on activist activist groups pressuring advertisers over

0:01:31.560 --> 0:01:35.919
<v Speaker 1>content moderation issues, even though nothing has changed yet. Who's

0:01:36.000 --> 0:01:41.680
<v Speaker 1>leaving Audias, leaving GM is leaving either leaving really big

0:01:41.760 --> 0:01:44.720
<v Speaker 1>names are leaving, Emily. And to your point there, Elon,

0:01:44.800 --> 0:01:48.120
<v Speaker 1>with tweeting yesterday you did a poll thing what you

0:01:48.200 --> 0:01:52.640
<v Speaker 1>advertise or stand behind free speech or political correctness, those

0:01:52.640 --> 0:01:54.560
<v Speaker 1>are the only two choice of that. Emily actually think

0:01:54.560 --> 0:01:56.240
<v Speaker 1>that's probably a little bit of a false choice for

0:01:56.320 --> 0:01:59.360
<v Speaker 1>these brands. They are looking at Twitter as the plates

0:01:59.400 --> 0:02:02.000
<v Speaker 1>to put dons and find some return on that advent.

0:02:02.200 --> 0:02:04.680
<v Speaker 1>That return is going to be kind of number one

0:02:04.760 --> 0:02:08.519
<v Speaker 1>in their minds. As we've seen um Twitter the business

0:02:08.680 --> 0:02:11.560
<v Speaker 1>kind of you know, convulsing over the last week, with

0:02:11.919 --> 0:02:15.240
<v Speaker 1>laying off about half of the workforce, with questions around

0:02:15.280 --> 0:02:18.640
<v Speaker 1>who is leading different departments, and with Elon trying to

0:02:18.720 --> 0:02:22.320
<v Speaker 1>counter that by assuring advertisers that they will be moderating

0:02:22.560 --> 0:02:25.800
<v Speaker 1>content on the platform. It seems like a lot of

0:02:25.800 --> 0:02:28.600
<v Speaker 1>these big names are deciding right now to take a pause.

0:02:29.120 --> 0:02:32.160
<v Speaker 1>And I would say this is a pretty problematic thing

0:02:32.200 --> 0:02:34.680
<v Speaker 1>for Twitter. You'll remember the last earnings report they had,

0:02:34.720 --> 0:02:38.000
<v Speaker 1>they actually saw revenue decline from a year prior in

0:02:38.040 --> 0:02:41.480
<v Speaker 1>that quarter. And now Ellen is taking a company that

0:02:41.639 --> 0:02:45.000
<v Speaker 1>is private and will have about a billion dollar interest

0:02:45.040 --> 0:02:48.360
<v Speaker 1>bill every year for the debt that they used to

0:02:48.400 --> 0:02:51.760
<v Speaker 1>take this company private. So advertisers here are the lifeblood.

0:02:51.960 --> 0:02:54.720
<v Speaker 1>Ellen's coming in with um a little bit of perhaps

0:02:55.040 --> 0:02:58.239
<v Speaker 1>sauciness at them for leaving the platform, but they will

0:02:58.280 --> 0:03:02.520
<v Speaker 1>absolutely need those dollars who forward. All right, So we're

0:03:02.520 --> 0:03:06.960
<v Speaker 1>talking Volkswagen Fiser General Mills. Let's talk about the layoffs.

0:03:07.000 --> 0:03:11.000
<v Speaker 1>Employees started getting emails early, early in the morning that

0:03:11.040 --> 0:03:14.680
<v Speaker 1>they were being terminated, cools getting let go. Is it

0:03:14.840 --> 0:03:18.600
<v Speaker 1>that thirty seven hundred number that we've been reporting right now?

0:03:18.639 --> 0:03:22.080
<v Speaker 1>It seems like it is inching toward that number. And

0:03:22.160 --> 0:03:24.560
<v Speaker 1>you have some teams like you mentioned at the top,

0:03:24.639 --> 0:03:27.920
<v Speaker 1>like the communications team, that have been completely gutted, losing

0:03:28.360 --> 0:03:32.000
<v Speaker 1>about eighty eight of their ninety employees. So you have

0:03:32.160 --> 0:03:34.320
<v Speaker 1>folks kind of all the way across the board, and Emily.

0:03:34.400 --> 0:03:36.880
<v Speaker 1>One of the reasons why advertisers might actually be pausing,

0:03:37.160 --> 0:03:40.000
<v Speaker 1>it's sort of related to how this is being handled.

0:03:40.440 --> 0:03:43.280
<v Speaker 1>It is typical in a acquisition or in a change

0:03:43.280 --> 0:03:45.400
<v Speaker 1>of leadership for the new leaders to come in to

0:03:45.480 --> 0:03:47.600
<v Speaker 1>kind of take a survey of the land and to

0:03:47.920 --> 0:03:50.200
<v Speaker 1>kind of approach these things a little bit differently. The

0:03:50.200 --> 0:03:52.680
<v Speaker 1>way that Ellen has come in with these kind of

0:03:52.760 --> 0:03:56.840
<v Speaker 1>emails sometimes overnight for employees and UM, what some employees

0:03:56.840 --> 0:03:58.960
<v Speaker 1>are looking at is kind of a coin flip has

0:03:59.000 --> 0:04:01.680
<v Speaker 1>injected a lot of UM, someone call it chaos into

0:04:01.720 --> 0:04:04.320
<v Speaker 1>the business. So we're seeing the cuts across the board.

0:04:04.560 --> 0:04:08.680
<v Speaker 1>There are some areas he's staying and urging UM perhaps

0:04:08.800 --> 0:04:13.040
<v Speaker 1>for that advertise advertiser audience, that he is bringing the

0:04:13.080 --> 0:04:16.719
<v Speaker 1>tools back online for content moderation UM, and areas like

0:04:16.760 --> 0:04:19.760
<v Speaker 1>that that he has put make care to reference in

0:04:19.800 --> 0:04:22.120
<v Speaker 1>the last forty eight hours. But it does seem like

0:04:22.440 --> 0:04:25.520
<v Speaker 1>it's pretty broad based across the company and in terms

0:04:25.520 --> 0:04:29.839
<v Speaker 1>of word that those head count cuts are coming from. Meantime,

0:04:29.880 --> 0:04:33.320
<v Speaker 1>Twitter is being sued uh in a class action lawsuit

0:04:33.680 --> 0:04:39.039
<v Speaker 1>by employees who say their termination is wrongful or that

0:04:39.080 --> 0:04:41.800
<v Speaker 1>at least under California employment law, he can't make big

0:04:41.880 --> 0:04:45.560
<v Speaker 1>changes like this before sixty days have passed. Can you

0:04:45.600 --> 0:04:49.039
<v Speaker 1>explain the lawsuit to us and how good of a

0:04:49.080 --> 0:04:52.920
<v Speaker 1>case they have? Sure in the state of California. We're

0:04:53.000 --> 0:04:55.120
<v Speaker 1>we're rebooth our Emily right now, there's something called a

0:04:55.200 --> 0:04:59.000
<v Speaker 1>war notice where employers have to give a sixty day

0:04:59.040 --> 0:05:01.919
<v Speaker 1>notice before be off above a certain threshold of people.

0:05:02.120 --> 0:05:05.400
<v Speaker 1>That Twitter is certainly clearing that threshold. This is a

0:05:05.480 --> 0:05:08.240
<v Speaker 1>lawyer who's bringing this class action suit, who actually has

0:05:08.600 --> 0:05:11.839
<v Speaker 1>let a suit against Musk before over a similar matter

0:05:12.000 --> 0:05:16.039
<v Speaker 1>for layoffs at Tesla. You'll remember, um, he elon must

0:05:16.040 --> 0:05:18.640
<v Speaker 1>hold our very own editor in chief that he saw

0:05:18.680 --> 0:05:21.120
<v Speaker 1>that suit is trivial. Um, so you can imagine what

0:05:21.240 --> 0:05:24.480
<v Speaker 1>he how he might perceive this suit today. That lawyer

0:05:24.560 --> 0:05:27.880
<v Speaker 1>did come back, uh, just this afternoon and say that

0:05:27.960 --> 0:05:31.159
<v Speaker 1>she's happy to see that some of the severance packages

0:05:31.200 --> 0:05:34.120
<v Speaker 1>are actually paying out employees over the number of day

0:05:34.200 --> 0:05:38.160
<v Speaker 1>some employees over the number of days that are legally required. Um.

0:05:38.320 --> 0:05:40.520
<v Speaker 1>So it seems like there could still be some activity

0:05:40.520 --> 0:05:43.800
<v Speaker 1>on that case, but certainly with the swiftness of the

0:05:43.839 --> 0:05:46.120
<v Speaker 1>decision that was made, there are a lot of questions

0:05:46.200 --> 0:05:49.279
<v Speaker 1>raised around legality, both here in the state of California

0:05:49.360 --> 0:05:51.159
<v Speaker 1>and you can probably imagine in some of the other

0:05:51.160 --> 0:05:56.680
<v Speaker 1>countries where Twitter has offices as well. All Right, Alex Brenka.

0:05:56.720 --> 0:05:59.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure there'll be lots of news more and more

0:05:59.520 --> 0:06:01.560
<v Speaker 1>over the Again, thank you so much for bringing us

0:06:01.560 --> 0:06:04.960
<v Speaker 1>the very latest. Will continue to watch your reporting. Zooming

0:06:04.960 --> 0:06:07.520
<v Speaker 1>out to the tech space at large. Now, things not

0:06:07.600 --> 0:06:10.760
<v Speaker 1>looking much better, the Nasdaq one hundred dropping more than

0:06:10.800 --> 0:06:14.200
<v Speaker 1>five percent this week as the sector veils from economic uncertainty.

0:06:14.240 --> 0:06:15.719
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna get more on the bigger picture here with

0:06:15.720 --> 0:06:20.200
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg's Emily Grafeo. Emily, how is tech weighing on overall markets?

0:06:20.240 --> 0:06:23.440
<v Speaker 1>It's not just Twitter, but Apple, Amazon, where we're also

0:06:23.520 --> 0:06:27.479
<v Speaker 1>seeing significant changes in strategy when it comes to spending

0:06:27.480 --> 0:06:30.960
<v Speaker 1>and hiring. We are seeing these stocks falling, but in

0:06:31.040 --> 0:06:34.120
<v Speaker 1>terms of how much they're impacting the overall market, I

0:06:34.160 --> 0:06:37.440
<v Speaker 1>think that story is really beginning to change as the

0:06:37.480 --> 0:06:41.359
<v Speaker 1>Federal Reserve raises interest rates. I was actually looking at

0:06:41.600 --> 0:06:44.760
<v Speaker 1>just how much um these tech stocks and the movements

0:06:44.760 --> 0:06:48.640
<v Speaker 1>in these stocks impact the broader SMP five hundred. For

0:06:48.760 --> 0:06:51.680
<v Speaker 1>a really long time. In the last two years, the

0:06:51.800 --> 0:06:55.200
<v Speaker 1>narrative has been, you know, these megacat tech stocks make

0:06:55.279 --> 0:06:58.080
<v Speaker 1>up such a large portion of the SMP five hundred,

0:06:58.120 --> 0:07:02.080
<v Speaker 1>we can't see the market gain without the strength there.

0:07:02.279 --> 0:07:04.960
<v Speaker 1>But if you look at the month of October UM,

0:07:05.279 --> 0:07:08.960
<v Speaker 1>four out of the five largest mega cap tech stocks

0:07:09.040 --> 0:07:12.280
<v Speaker 1>in the SMP five hundred posted a negative return, and

0:07:12.320 --> 0:07:15.560
<v Speaker 1>we saw the SMP five hundred gain about eight percent,

0:07:15.960 --> 0:07:19.360
<v Speaker 1>So the equal weighted index was even higher, almost ten

0:07:19.480 --> 0:07:22.840
<v Speaker 1>percent there. So it is starting to seem like investors

0:07:22.880 --> 0:07:25.720
<v Speaker 1>can play the broader stock market and they don't need

0:07:25.760 --> 0:07:28.800
<v Speaker 1>that tech strength like they did before. And we're really

0:07:28.800 --> 0:07:31.720
<v Speaker 1>starting to see that this federal reserve tightening is weighing

0:07:31.800 --> 0:07:36.520
<v Speaker 1>on these big tech companies. What are money managers saying

0:07:36.560 --> 0:07:40.160
<v Speaker 1>about this? Are they getting skittish? It's interesting. I was

0:07:40.200 --> 0:07:43.400
<v Speaker 1>actually at an investing conference last week and I have

0:07:43.560 --> 0:07:46.320
<v Speaker 1>to say, Emily, there weren't a lot of conversations about

0:07:46.560 --> 0:07:49.480
<v Speaker 1>where can I invest in tech? The questions were more about,

0:07:49.760 --> 0:07:52.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, where the value stocks? Um, how can I

0:07:52.400 --> 0:07:56.200
<v Speaker 1>position my fixed income portfolio. I was talking with Jan

0:07:56.320 --> 0:07:58.920
<v Speaker 1>von Eck, he's the CEO of van Eck Funds. We

0:07:58.920 --> 0:08:01.520
<v Speaker 1>were talking a little bit of out technology stocks. He

0:08:01.600 --> 0:08:05.400
<v Speaker 1>said he probably wouldn't go overweight, but the valuations have

0:08:05.600 --> 0:08:09.560
<v Speaker 1>come down in that sector, so he said that is attractive.

0:08:09.720 --> 0:08:12.840
<v Speaker 1>But um, when you look at overall money managers, they

0:08:12.880 --> 0:08:16.920
<v Speaker 1>are thinking about value stocks more than just Oh my gosh,

0:08:16.920 --> 0:08:20.720
<v Speaker 1>I need Apple overweight in my portfolio. There is some

0:08:20.840 --> 0:08:24.000
<v Speaker 1>fear that the federal reserve tightening is going away on

0:08:24.040 --> 0:08:26.800
<v Speaker 1>the stocks more than it already has, and that earnings

0:08:26.800 --> 0:08:31.120
<v Speaker 1>do have to come down even more. All right, Emily,

0:08:31.640 --> 0:08:34.760
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much for zooming out. Bloomberg's Emily graffo

0:08:34.880 --> 0:08:46.400
<v Speaker 1>so much to continue to watch the Fed trying to

0:08:46.440 --> 0:08:50.040
<v Speaker 1>tamp down affordability, but people continue to pay top dollar

0:08:50.360 --> 0:08:54.960
<v Speaker 1>for experiences. Expedia posted record quarterly revenue and third quarter

0:08:54.960 --> 0:08:58.600
<v Speaker 1>bookings free cash flow for the first nine months three

0:08:58.679 --> 0:09:03.480
<v Speaker 1>point one billion dollars, more than double levels. Expedia CEO

0:09:03.600 --> 0:09:08.280
<v Speaker 1>and vice chair Peter Kern joins me. Now, so, uh, Peter,

0:09:08.480 --> 0:09:10.560
<v Speaker 1>let's talk about the bigger picture here. It looks like

0:09:10.600 --> 0:09:13.960
<v Speaker 1>people are continuing to spend on travel. I know we

0:09:14.040 --> 0:09:17.599
<v Speaker 1>had some hurricanes that interrupted some of the flow, but

0:09:17.679 --> 0:09:20.880
<v Speaker 1>outside of that, how good was the summer travel season?

0:09:21.960 --> 0:09:24.600
<v Speaker 1>The summer travel season was great, Emily. You know, it

0:09:24.760 --> 0:09:27.240
<v Speaker 1>was everything I think most of us expected, which was

0:09:27.320 --> 0:09:30.320
<v Speaker 1>tons of pent up demand anywhere in the world where

0:09:30.320 --> 0:09:32.800
<v Speaker 1>people could travel. Of course, there's parts of the world

0:09:32.840 --> 0:09:36.080
<v Speaker 1>still even now, in an apac and other places where

0:09:36.080 --> 0:09:38.760
<v Speaker 1>it's still quite difficult to travel. So there is more

0:09:38.800 --> 0:09:41.440
<v Speaker 1>to come in terms of opening up world travel. But

0:09:41.760 --> 0:09:44.960
<v Speaker 1>the summer was great. Business has continued to be quite strong,

0:09:45.000 --> 0:09:49.280
<v Speaker 1>and demand really hasn't ebbed since then. So you know,

0:09:49.360 --> 0:09:53.280
<v Speaker 1>everything so far looks pretty good, notwithstanding all the macroeconomic

0:09:53.320 --> 0:09:55.800
<v Speaker 1>warriors that you talk about all day. So um, so

0:09:55.800 --> 0:09:59.040
<v Speaker 1>we're feeling pretty good about things. But if we had

0:09:59.080 --> 0:10:02.240
<v Speaker 1>into a recession, I mean, I know people are spending

0:10:02.280 --> 0:10:04.959
<v Speaker 1>money on travel to this point, who's to say that

0:10:04.960 --> 0:10:06.720
<v Speaker 1>people aren't going to say, oh, maybe I should take

0:10:06.760 --> 0:10:09.840
<v Speaker 1>a maybe I shouldn't take that vacation, or let's just

0:10:10.200 --> 0:10:16.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, drive um to a vacation rental nearby. Yeah, listen,

0:10:16.120 --> 0:10:19.160
<v Speaker 1>I think, uh, macroeconomics will be what they will be.

0:10:19.320 --> 0:10:22.560
<v Speaker 1>I think so far what's been demonstrated is that while

0:10:22.559 --> 0:10:25.439
<v Speaker 1>there has have been a few cracks and other categories,

0:10:25.480 --> 0:10:28.720
<v Speaker 1>travel hasn't cracked. I think partly because people have missed

0:10:28.720 --> 0:10:31.079
<v Speaker 1>it so much during COVID and they've realized how much

0:10:31.120 --> 0:10:34.760
<v Speaker 1>they want those experiences more generally. Uh, And we've seen

0:10:34.760 --> 0:10:37.160
<v Speaker 1>corporate travels start to come back and other pieces start

0:10:37.200 --> 0:10:39.760
<v Speaker 1>to come back. So I think, you know, we have

0:10:39.880 --> 0:10:42.560
<v Speaker 1>some good running room, but there's nothing to say that

0:10:42.600 --> 0:10:45.520
<v Speaker 1>people can start to change their minds. But remember, you know,

0:10:45.600 --> 0:10:49.040
<v Speaker 1>global travels a two plus trillion dollar industry, so this

0:10:49.160 --> 0:10:51.840
<v Speaker 1>isn't a zero sum game. And we're a growth company.

0:10:51.880 --> 0:10:54.440
<v Speaker 1>We're trying to build our base of members, build our

0:10:54.480 --> 0:10:58.720
<v Speaker 1>business up, offer great new tools for travelers, great new benefits.

0:10:58.760 --> 0:11:01.480
<v Speaker 1>So we believe there's ample reason for us to continue

0:11:01.520 --> 0:11:04.280
<v Speaker 1>to attract travelers. And even if they're trading down a

0:11:04.320 --> 0:11:07.120
<v Speaker 1>little bit or making slightly different adjustments to their travel,

0:11:07.200 --> 0:11:10.320
<v Speaker 1>we think they're still gonna want to travel. Do you

0:11:10.400 --> 0:11:13.400
<v Speaker 1>think that there's something fundamentally different in terms of how

0:11:13.440 --> 0:11:17.240
<v Speaker 1>people approach travel? You know, this isn't just a few

0:11:17.280 --> 0:11:19.720
<v Speaker 1>vacations they wanted to get out of their system, but

0:11:19.920 --> 0:11:23.280
<v Speaker 1>as a whole new frame of mind. Well, I think

0:11:23.320 --> 0:11:25.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, anytime you have an existential threat to life

0:11:25.840 --> 0:11:28.800
<v Speaker 1>on the planet, people probably respond with a little bit

0:11:28.800 --> 0:11:30.240
<v Speaker 1>of like, I want to live, I want to go

0:11:30.320 --> 0:11:32.560
<v Speaker 1>see the things I want to see. Uh. You know

0:11:32.559 --> 0:11:35.439
<v Speaker 1>there are people, uh my age and older who are

0:11:35.640 --> 0:11:37.960
<v Speaker 1>at a point where they're saying, you know, I only

0:11:38.000 --> 0:11:39.720
<v Speaker 1>have so many trips left in my life, you know,

0:11:39.880 --> 0:11:41.440
<v Speaker 1>so there's a lot to get out of there. And

0:11:41.480 --> 0:11:44.000
<v Speaker 1>I think COVID made us all reassess that. So I

0:11:44.040 --> 0:11:46.800
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't chalk this up to you know, hybrid work or

0:11:46.840 --> 0:11:49.640
<v Speaker 1>other things. I think it's really just, uh, people are

0:11:49.679 --> 0:11:52.920
<v Speaker 1>realizing that experiences or what make life great and travel

0:11:53.040 --> 0:11:55.120
<v Speaker 1>is where we get all that. So, you know, you

0:11:55.160 --> 0:11:56.839
<v Speaker 1>and I have talked about it before. We all want

0:11:56.840 --> 0:11:59.880
<v Speaker 1>to travel. Everybody wants to travel, and I think, Sir

0:12:00.000 --> 0:12:02.679
<v Speaker 1>and Way, we haven't used up that desire yet. You know,

0:12:02.760 --> 0:12:05.360
<v Speaker 1>in five years from now, has everyone gotten out of

0:12:05.400 --> 0:12:07.400
<v Speaker 1>their system? Maybe, but I don't think we've burned it

0:12:07.400 --> 0:12:12.439
<v Speaker 1>off in you know, eight months or twelve months. Airbnb

0:12:12.640 --> 0:12:14.679
<v Speaker 1>had a tough quarter at least if you look at

0:12:14.679 --> 0:12:18.640
<v Speaker 1>it from a market's perspective. Unlike the positive reaction we're

0:12:18.640 --> 0:12:21.959
<v Speaker 1>seeing from investor investors to your results. What do you

0:12:22.000 --> 0:12:26.880
<v Speaker 1>think happening there? You know, I'm not exactly sure what's happening,

0:12:26.960 --> 0:12:30.480
<v Speaker 1>but I think part of what we observed in what

0:12:30.559 --> 0:12:32.920
<v Speaker 1>we've seen with Airbnb is, you know, they are much

0:12:32.960 --> 0:12:37.240
<v Speaker 1>broader company. They appeal to much more, you know, room rentals,

0:12:37.280 --> 0:12:40.000
<v Speaker 1>parts of home rentals. We don't do that, um and

0:12:40.080 --> 0:12:42.360
<v Speaker 1>I think the scale of that business is such that

0:12:42.360 --> 0:12:45.079
<v Speaker 1>that is a market that may be seeing more weakness

0:12:45.520 --> 0:12:47.400
<v Speaker 1>from the lower end of the market. We as a

0:12:47.440 --> 0:12:49.720
<v Speaker 1>business or somewhat less exposed to that. In our verbo

0:12:49.760 --> 0:12:52.600
<v Speaker 1>brands were whole home. We tend to be middle and

0:12:52.679 --> 0:12:57.320
<v Speaker 1>upper market really the same in our main travel brands,

0:12:57.360 --> 0:13:00.800
<v Speaker 1>so we haven't seen those same cracks. But I think

0:13:00.840 --> 0:13:04.720
<v Speaker 1>if you're exposed significantly to the broad global you know,

0:13:04.840 --> 0:13:08.160
<v Speaker 1>lower end, you are probably going to be under somewhat

0:13:08.200 --> 0:13:10.679
<v Speaker 1>more pressure. But you know, we think they'll do fine.

0:13:11.280 --> 0:13:14.600
<v Speaker 1>FCS of course as a challenge globally as well. Again,

0:13:14.640 --> 0:13:17.280
<v Speaker 1>we're heavily weighted towards North America, which is great since

0:13:17.320 --> 0:13:20.600
<v Speaker 1>the dollar is strong, but if you're waited differently, that

0:13:20.679 --> 0:13:24.560
<v Speaker 1>can have a bunch of different impacts on you. Well.

0:13:24.679 --> 0:13:26.640
<v Speaker 1>A d r s are still average daily rates, still

0:13:26.679 --> 0:13:30.880
<v Speaker 1>above pre pandemic levels, but Airbnb, some of your competitors,

0:13:30.880 --> 0:13:33.520
<v Speaker 1>expecting those to moderate. Then there could also be this

0:13:33.640 --> 0:13:38.160
<v Speaker 1>change in the business mix. Are you expecting any softness

0:13:38.160 --> 0:13:41.720
<v Speaker 1>going into next year? You know, we haven't seen it yet.

0:13:42.040 --> 0:13:45.280
<v Speaker 1>Uh and uh. Again, the makeup of our business mixes

0:13:45.360 --> 0:13:49.360
<v Speaker 1>are are somewhat different, but UM hotels are certainly certainly

0:13:49.400 --> 0:13:51.319
<v Speaker 1>the big chains we're talking about holding a d R

0:13:51.400 --> 0:13:53.880
<v Speaker 1>s Uh. You know, hotels so far have been willing

0:13:53.880 --> 0:13:58.440
<v Speaker 1>to be less full in favor of holding price. Uh.

0:13:58.600 --> 0:14:01.480
<v Speaker 1>Does that last forever? Do some hotels change what they do?

0:14:01.679 --> 0:14:05.560
<v Speaker 1>Hard to know. But again, while demands stays strong, which

0:14:05.559 --> 0:14:08.000
<v Speaker 1>it is now, I don't think there's any you know,

0:14:08.160 --> 0:14:10.480
<v Speaker 1>end in sight to prices being up. And they're not

0:14:10.559 --> 0:14:14.240
<v Speaker 1>just up, they're considerably up since pre pandemic levels, and

0:14:14.280 --> 0:14:17.400
<v Speaker 1>that probably will hold. In the home rental business, it's

0:14:17.400 --> 0:14:20.240
<v Speaker 1>a little more violatile because you have single owners and

0:14:20.240 --> 0:14:23.120
<v Speaker 1>there's a little more price pressure sometimes on some of them.

0:14:23.160 --> 0:14:25.840
<v Speaker 1>But certainly in the hotel industry, the airline industry, I

0:14:25.880 --> 0:14:30.360
<v Speaker 1>think I think prices will still be high. So last

0:14:30.400 --> 0:14:34.200
<v Speaker 1>quick question, Verbo, give us the picture of supply and

0:14:34.360 --> 0:14:39.720
<v Speaker 1>demand given what you've seen, you know, going into next year. Yeah, well,

0:14:39.800 --> 0:14:42.840
<v Speaker 1>demand has remained quite strong for us, and other than

0:14:42.880 --> 0:14:45.760
<v Speaker 1>the hurricane which you mentioned at the beginning. Uh, you know,

0:14:45.840 --> 0:14:50.360
<v Speaker 1>we we've seen strength, you know, throughout COVID and since

0:14:50.440 --> 0:14:54.720
<v Speaker 1>COVID has somewhat subsided. Uh, we're very bullish on next year.

0:14:55.280 --> 0:14:57.720
<v Speaker 1>We've got you know, Verbo is going to become part

0:14:57.720 --> 0:15:01.080
<v Speaker 1>of our our global loyalty plan or and key loyalty

0:15:01.120 --> 0:15:03.040
<v Speaker 1>plan that's rolling out next year, and that's going to

0:15:03.120 --> 0:15:06.240
<v Speaker 1>be a great opportunity for Verbo members to participate in

0:15:06.280 --> 0:15:09.440
<v Speaker 1>our other brands and our other members Expedia, Hotels, etcetera,

0:15:09.680 --> 0:15:12.480
<v Speaker 1>to really participate in Verbo. So we see a lot

0:15:12.480 --> 0:15:15.360
<v Speaker 1>of opportunity there, and the supply side, we think there's

0:15:15.360 --> 0:15:17.640
<v Speaker 1>plenty of room to grow. We are being more aggressive

0:15:17.640 --> 0:15:20.080
<v Speaker 1>in that space and we expect to add, you know,

0:15:20.120 --> 0:15:22.960
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of supplies. So so we feel really good

0:15:23.000 --> 0:15:25.160
<v Speaker 1>about the brand, good about its part in our family

0:15:25.200 --> 0:15:28.640
<v Speaker 1>of brands, and certainly more opportunity for us as we

0:15:28.720 --> 0:15:34.440
<v Speaker 1>consolidate those loyalty plans. Peter current CEO of Expedia and

0:15:34.520 --> 0:15:35.920
<v Speaker 1>vice chair Peter are always good to have you here.

0:15:35.960 --> 0:15:40.080
<v Speaker 1>Thank you so much for joining us. Coming up, cyber

0:15:40.120 --> 0:15:43.280
<v Speaker 1>attacks continuing to surge an increasingly digital world. We're going

0:15:43.320 --> 0:15:47.320
<v Speaker 1>to dive into some new data from Rubric about what

0:15:47.360 --> 0:15:50.960
<v Speaker 1>companies should do to protect themselves. That's next. This is Bloomberg.

0:16:02.200 --> 0:16:05.440
<v Speaker 1>Cyber tags are picking up this according a new data

0:16:05.600 --> 0:16:09.040
<v Speaker 1>from the cloud data management and security company Rubric. I

0:16:09.080 --> 0:16:11.960
<v Speaker 1>want to bring in CEO and co founder People Sinha

0:16:12.040 --> 0:16:15.080
<v Speaker 1>now for more on their new reports. So you found

0:16:15.120 --> 0:16:20.880
<v Speaker 1>that of companies reported a breach, that is a staggering number.

0:16:21.800 --> 0:16:25.880
<v Speaker 1>Walk that out for us a bit that is actually

0:16:25.960 --> 0:16:31.280
<v Speaker 1>validates our thesis. We were suspecting that almost all of

0:16:31.280 --> 0:16:35.000
<v Speaker 1>the organizations in the world has already been infiltrated, and

0:16:35.040 --> 0:16:39.320
<v Speaker 1>what people reported was that percent of the companies had

0:16:40.520 --> 0:16:44.240
<v Speaker 1>once at least one cyber breach. And what is also

0:16:44.320 --> 0:16:48.200
<v Speaker 1>interesting is that seventy percent of the organization said that

0:16:48.240 --> 0:16:52.080
<v Speaker 1>they would pay for ransomware to get rid of this problem.

0:16:52.320 --> 0:16:57.720
<v Speaker 1>That's how low the confidences. So how our companies responding

0:16:57.760 --> 0:17:01.960
<v Speaker 1>to these threats? Are they ready? I don't think everyone

0:17:02.080 --> 0:17:05.639
<v Speaker 1>is ready. Um, even though there is a partnership private

0:17:05.720 --> 0:17:10.119
<v Speaker 1>and public Biden administration put together a zero trust framework.

0:17:10.640 --> 0:17:13.920
<v Speaker 1>Companies are looking at it, they're spending money, they're getting prepared.

0:17:14.320 --> 0:17:17.320
<v Speaker 1>But this problem is a huge. Ransomware is the single

0:17:17.400 --> 0:17:20.399
<v Speaker 1>largest threat to our economy, and everybody is saying that,

0:17:20.440 --> 0:17:22.600
<v Speaker 1>how do I keep my business going? What do I

0:17:22.840 --> 0:17:26.359
<v Speaker 1>make sure do to make sure that we are not

0:17:26.480 --> 0:17:30.800
<v Speaker 1>only preventing and detecting these attacks, but also create resiliency

0:17:30.880 --> 0:17:33.200
<v Speaker 1>where in spite of an attack, I can keep going.

0:17:35.520 --> 0:17:40.280
<v Speaker 1>So there's an ongoing war on Ukraine. You've got instability

0:17:40.440 --> 0:17:43.199
<v Speaker 1>at Twitter, which is a major platform. You've got midterm

0:17:43.240 --> 0:17:46.440
<v Speaker 1>elections coming up here in the United States. Are you

0:17:46.520 --> 0:17:49.600
<v Speaker 1>expecting the threats to ratch it up? And how do

0:17:49.680 --> 0:17:55.280
<v Speaker 1>companies respond? Creds are definitely increasing geopolitical situation, you have

0:17:56.000 --> 0:17:59.399
<v Speaker 1>uh Nason estate actors that are taking sides. You have

0:18:00.080 --> 0:18:04.719
<v Speaker 1>again mid term coming up, that we have cyber warfare

0:18:05.240 --> 0:18:08.439
<v Speaker 1>going on, I think, and in this situation, businesses have

0:18:08.520 --> 0:18:11.439
<v Speaker 1>to really think that attacks will happen. There is no

0:18:11.520 --> 0:18:14.080
<v Speaker 1>way to prevent it. How do they keep going in

0:18:14.160 --> 0:18:16.880
<v Speaker 1>spite of an attack? How do they create a resiliency plan,

0:18:17.119 --> 0:18:19.399
<v Speaker 1>how do they make sure that they recover from it?

0:18:20.119 --> 0:18:22.479
<v Speaker 1>And that's where companies are investing money and we are

0:18:22.520 --> 0:18:27.800
<v Speaker 1>seeing in our own market where recovery ability to identify

0:18:28.119 --> 0:18:30.480
<v Speaker 1>what part of the data was impacted, and how to

0:18:30.520 --> 0:18:34.080
<v Speaker 1>get rid of a bad content and recover good content

0:18:34.160 --> 0:18:39.520
<v Speaker 1>fast is what is everyone is focused on. Is public

0:18:39.560 --> 0:18:43.679
<v Speaker 1>private engagement between for example, the Biden and administration and

0:18:43.680 --> 0:18:46.360
<v Speaker 1>the private sector. Is that helping or do we need

0:18:46.400 --> 0:18:50.359
<v Speaker 1>to see more? We definitely need to see more here.

0:18:50.800 --> 0:18:53.480
<v Speaker 1>But it is a great first step because what happens

0:18:53.560 --> 0:18:57.720
<v Speaker 1>is that there is a natural hesitation and sharing data

0:18:57.760 --> 0:19:00.520
<v Speaker 1>and setting information between companies because no wants to come

0:19:00.560 --> 0:19:03.040
<v Speaker 1>across saying that, hey, you got attacked, we didn't have

0:19:03.119 --> 0:19:05.919
<v Speaker 1>the right defenses. But when the government comes into the

0:19:05.960 --> 0:19:09.560
<v Speaker 1>picture and creates a framework of information sharing, what kind

0:19:09.560 --> 0:19:12.199
<v Speaker 1>of attack has happened, how do you recover from it?

0:19:12.320 --> 0:19:15.560
<v Speaker 1>What kind of preventive measures you take? That really helps

0:19:15.600 --> 0:19:19.640
<v Speaker 1>companies get more confident, and confidence is what is required.

0:19:19.720 --> 0:19:22.879
<v Speaker 1>I mean, our study also found that a third of

0:19:22.960 --> 0:19:26.680
<v Speaker 1>the board have no confidence that their companies can recover

0:19:27.440 --> 0:19:34.560
<v Speaker 1>from a cyber incident. Okay, Wow, staggering new data um Work,

0:19:34.680 --> 0:19:37.480
<v Speaker 1>CEO and co founder of People Sindha People. Thank you

0:19:37.560 --> 0:19:49.359
<v Speaker 1>so much for sharing all of that with us. Welcome

0:19:49.359 --> 0:19:51.879
<v Speaker 1>back to Flomark Technology. I'm emily changing in San Francisco.

0:19:51.960 --> 0:19:55.320
<v Speaker 1>Let's get back to Elon Musk's Twitter takeover and what

0:19:55.400 --> 0:19:57.760
<v Speaker 1>it means for the future of free speech and content

0:19:57.840 --> 0:20:01.720
<v Speaker 1>moderation on the platform. My next guest has direct insight

0:20:01.800 --> 0:20:03.960
<v Speaker 1>into this after meeting with Elon Musk a few days

0:20:03.960 --> 0:20:06.320
<v Speaker 1>ago to talk about it for Sean Robinson is the

0:20:06.359 --> 0:20:10.879
<v Speaker 1>president of the racial justice organization Color of Change, and

0:20:10.920 --> 0:20:12.879
<v Speaker 1>he joins me now Rishan, thank you so much for

0:20:12.920 --> 0:20:15.840
<v Speaker 1>taking the time to join us. So how did the

0:20:15.880 --> 0:20:19.160
<v Speaker 1>meeting with Ellen go? Did it leave you hopeful or

0:20:19.160 --> 0:20:22.679
<v Speaker 1>with more concerns? Well, the meeting that we had on

0:20:22.720 --> 0:20:27.240
<v Speaker 1>Tuesday actually was UM BOTHUM, a good opportunity for us

0:20:27.280 --> 0:20:29.600
<v Speaker 1>to have a conversation, and and we walked out of

0:20:29.640 --> 0:20:35.040
<v Speaker 1>the meeting UM really focusing on UM hopeful actually that

0:20:35.240 --> 0:20:38.080
<v Speaker 1>his actions actually connected with the words in the meeting,

0:20:38.400 --> 0:20:42.119
<v Speaker 1>because he made three commitments in that meeting. UM commitments

0:20:42.160 --> 0:20:46.119
<v Speaker 1>around election integrity, commitments around the re platforming and ensuring

0:20:46.160 --> 0:20:49.280
<v Speaker 1>that will be a transparent process before anyone has been

0:20:49.280 --> 0:20:52.159
<v Speaker 1>re platform that has been UM taken off for the

0:20:52.240 --> 0:20:56.320
<v Speaker 1>egregious violation that anyone is the platform for, and then

0:20:56.320 --> 0:20:59.000
<v Speaker 1>talking about sort of the content moderation council he'd have

0:20:59.119 --> 0:21:02.359
<v Speaker 1>moving forward. He talked about agreeing with the sentiments and

0:21:02.400 --> 0:21:04.840
<v Speaker 1>the concerns that those of us in the civil rights

0:21:04.880 --> 0:21:08.080
<v Speaker 1>community brought up during that meeting. And we left the

0:21:08.119 --> 0:21:12.640
<v Speaker 1>meeting UM really wondering what would come next. And at

0:21:12.760 --> 0:21:15.800
<v Speaker 1>one thirty in the morning the next day, UM he

0:21:15.920 --> 0:21:19.480
<v Speaker 1>tweeted out UM tagging us in Matt tweet talking about

0:21:19.520 --> 0:21:23.120
<v Speaker 1>the meeting and making those commitments more public, But over

0:21:23.160 --> 0:21:26.360
<v Speaker 1>the last couple of days, we have seen him truly

0:21:26.960 --> 0:21:31.720
<v Speaker 1>and systematically dismantle the very infrastructure that would make those

0:21:31.760 --> 0:21:35.720
<v Speaker 1>commitments actually real. So the firing of safety and trust

0:21:36.240 --> 0:21:41.080
<v Speaker 1>um capacity inside of Twitter makes it impossible for him

0:21:41.119 --> 0:21:44.560
<v Speaker 1>to actually deliver on the commitments and promises that he

0:21:44.640 --> 0:21:47.639
<v Speaker 1>made in the meeting. So you know, the thing is

0:21:47.640 --> 0:21:50.320
<v Speaker 1>not just about your words, it's about your actions, and

0:21:50.400 --> 0:21:56.119
<v Speaker 1>actions are key here, and you are taking action by

0:21:56.600 --> 0:21:59.880
<v Speaker 1>h highlighting that move in your tweet. You tweeted. Elon

0:22:00.119 --> 0:22:03.280
<v Speaker 1>fired the entire team that identified the Twitter algorithm that

0:22:03.320 --> 0:22:06.840
<v Speaker 1>amplifies right wing voices over others. Not the first time

0:22:06.880 --> 0:22:10.840
<v Speaker 1>we've seen staff, particularly black employees, punished for flagging how

0:22:10.880 --> 0:22:17.359
<v Speaker 1>their companies products enable and amplify racism. Now, Musk today

0:22:17.520 --> 0:22:19.600
<v Speaker 1>said there's been a massive drop in revenue given this

0:22:19.640 --> 0:22:23.960
<v Speaker 1>pause from advertisers, even though according to him, nothing has

0:22:24.040 --> 0:22:27.919
<v Speaker 1>changed about content moderation. Yet, what do you say to

0:22:27.960 --> 0:22:32.359
<v Speaker 1>the folks who say, let's give Elon Musk sometime before

0:22:32.400 --> 0:22:35.520
<v Speaker 1>we make these dramatic moves. Yeah, well that's what we get.

0:22:35.560 --> 0:22:38.240
<v Speaker 1>We met with Elon Musk, and Elon Musk came out

0:22:38.800 --> 0:22:43.359
<v Speaker 1>um and made promises publicly and men UM right after

0:22:43.400 --> 0:22:46.520
<v Speaker 1>those promises, almost before the eight was dried on their promises,

0:22:46.840 --> 0:22:50.280
<v Speaker 1>he began to dismantle the very infrastruction that keep those

0:22:50.280 --> 0:22:53.119
<v Speaker 1>promises in place. Look, I want to be clear. Elon

0:22:53.200 --> 0:22:57.159
<v Speaker 1>Musk actually also met with advertisers. He met with coalitions

0:22:57.160 --> 0:23:02.000
<v Speaker 1>of folks working in advertising, and in the conversations UM

0:23:02.080 --> 0:23:04.359
<v Speaker 1>he made promises to them. He talked to them about

0:23:04.359 --> 0:23:08.480
<v Speaker 1>how content moderation was incredibly important and how he valued

0:23:08.520 --> 0:23:11.879
<v Speaker 1>content moderation. And then he went and he let go

0:23:11.960 --> 0:23:16.240
<v Speaker 1>of seventy of the staff that works on content moderation.

0:23:16.560 --> 0:23:20.280
<v Speaker 1>So the advertisers that are leaving are leaving because they

0:23:20.320 --> 0:23:23.320
<v Speaker 1>are concerned that their brands are gonna be next to

0:23:23.480 --> 0:23:26.800
<v Speaker 1>a product that the CEO in charge of it can't

0:23:26.840 --> 0:23:29.919
<v Speaker 1>be trusted, can't be trusted to deliver on their promises,

0:23:30.359 --> 0:23:33.800
<v Speaker 1>act acts in deeply erratic ways, and we'll put their

0:23:33.840 --> 0:23:38.119
<v Speaker 1>brands in harm's way. And so, as someone who's done

0:23:38.119 --> 0:23:40.680
<v Speaker 1>this work for a long time, has worked to hold

0:23:40.720 --> 0:23:46.200
<v Speaker 1>corporations accountable, to help them meet their actions with their words,

0:23:46.359 --> 0:23:49.240
<v Speaker 1>and to hold them accountable to that UM, I have

0:23:49.440 --> 0:23:53.439
<v Speaker 1>never seen so many advertisers not have to be convinced

0:23:53.800 --> 0:23:57.680
<v Speaker 1>not have to be pushed hard around UM the sort

0:23:57.680 --> 0:24:01.200
<v Speaker 1>of decisions that they are making right now, and quite frankly,

0:24:01.760 --> 0:24:05.159
<v Speaker 1>Um Elon Musk Um did have an opportunity when he

0:24:05.200 --> 0:24:09.600
<v Speaker 1>came in here UM to um actually move things forward.

0:24:09.640 --> 0:24:12.600
<v Speaker 1>Twitter was not a perfect company, Titter was not Twitter

0:24:12.720 --> 0:24:16.760
<v Speaker 1>was not doing everything well before Elon musk took over.

0:24:17.080 --> 0:24:20.320
<v Speaker 1>But what he has done is actually dismantled the type

0:24:20.359 --> 0:24:24.200
<v Speaker 1>of infrastructure that actually had to be increased in order

0:24:24.240 --> 0:24:27.159
<v Speaker 1>for the company to sort of live up to any

0:24:27.200 --> 0:24:31.000
<v Speaker 1>type of commitment to deal with the misinformation, the disinformation,

0:24:31.320 --> 0:24:36.240
<v Speaker 1>the amplification of hate and incitement of violence that has

0:24:36.359 --> 0:24:40.919
<v Speaker 1>become part of these platforms, UM currents, UM sort of

0:24:41.040 --> 0:24:46.760
<v Speaker 1>engagement and its legacy. Risad. The reason that this is

0:24:46.880 --> 0:24:50.600
<v Speaker 1>so important is because people of color, people in marginalized communities,

0:24:50.640 --> 0:24:55.840
<v Speaker 1>women face a disproportionate amount of harassment and hate online.

0:24:55.840 --> 0:24:59.840
<v Speaker 1>Can you explain why this matters, why this matters for

0:25:00.160 --> 0:25:07.920
<v Speaker 1>people who use Twitter, how he restructures and reframes the site. Well, yeah,

0:25:08.040 --> 0:25:10.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean, essentially what we're dealing with right now is

0:25:10.800 --> 0:25:14.359
<v Speaker 1>not just Twitter, but all the technology companies are essentially

0:25:14.400 --> 0:25:19.280
<v Speaker 1>self regulated companies and self regulated companies are unregulated company. Now,

0:25:19.720 --> 0:25:23.640
<v Speaker 1>if we think about other industries, right, the our seatbelts

0:25:23.960 --> 0:25:27.000
<v Speaker 1>are not necessarily safe in our cars are not necessarily

0:25:27.040 --> 0:25:30.640
<v Speaker 1>safe because of the benevolence of the auto industry alone.

0:25:30.920 --> 0:25:35.800
<v Speaker 1>They are safe because there's infrastructure, accountability standards UM. And

0:25:35.880 --> 0:25:38.199
<v Speaker 1>so when you think about sort of the ways in

0:25:38.240 --> 0:25:41.879
<v Speaker 1>which the business models work of social media platforms, what

0:25:42.040 --> 0:25:46.280
<v Speaker 1>gets amplified UM. What UM is sort of the incentive

0:25:46.280 --> 0:25:50.919
<v Speaker 1>structure of of what drives profits, how advertising is placed

0:25:51.040 --> 0:25:54.080
<v Speaker 1>up against certain types of content and not other type

0:25:54.080 --> 0:25:57.520
<v Speaker 1>of content, and how that type of content then gets prioritized.

0:25:57.880 --> 0:26:01.560
<v Speaker 1>You watch a set a certain section of choices that

0:26:01.600 --> 0:26:05.119
<v Speaker 1>are made that are far beyond freedom of speech. Freedom

0:26:05.160 --> 0:26:07.359
<v Speaker 1>of speech is not the same as freedom to be

0:26:07.400 --> 0:26:11.600
<v Speaker 1>amplified freedom of reach. And so to the extent that

0:26:11.800 --> 0:26:14.359
<v Speaker 1>UM when you see that companies are making these type

0:26:14.400 --> 0:26:18.320
<v Speaker 1>of choices, and then you look at the overwhelming body

0:26:18.320 --> 0:26:21.200
<v Speaker 1>of research that shows UM just you know, you can

0:26:21.280 --> 0:26:24.439
<v Speaker 1>look at a University of recent University of Cambridge study

0:26:24.440 --> 0:26:27.160
<v Speaker 1>that actually looks at who's getting more reach and who's

0:26:27.200 --> 0:26:29.520
<v Speaker 1>not getting more reach. If you see look at even

0:26:29.560 --> 0:26:32.640
<v Speaker 1>the safety and trust teams inside of Twitter that we're

0:26:32.640 --> 0:26:37.400
<v Speaker 1>pushing for more visibility and transparency around the algorithms. Those

0:26:37.440 --> 0:26:40.880
<v Speaker 1>people who have now been UM let go. We know

0:26:41.119 --> 0:26:45.199
<v Speaker 1>that UM the impact is clear that consequences for the

0:26:45.280 --> 0:26:49.600
<v Speaker 1>communities can be life or death in terms of how

0:26:49.760 --> 0:26:52.560
<v Speaker 1>how people are targeted, how people are exploited, how people

0:26:52.560 --> 0:26:54.520
<v Speaker 1>are put in harm's way, and when you have an

0:26:54.600 --> 0:26:58.320
<v Speaker 1>unaccountable billionaire running this company that feels he doesn't have

0:26:58.440 --> 0:27:01.800
<v Speaker 1>to listen to anyone. The best that we have is

0:27:01.840 --> 0:27:04.639
<v Speaker 1>the type of activism that holds those that seek to

0:27:04.760 --> 0:27:08.280
<v Speaker 1>enable this platform, enable this leader accountable. And that's what

0:27:08.359 --> 0:27:10.680
<v Speaker 1>we have to do. We have to speak truth to power.

0:27:10.760 --> 0:27:12.760
<v Speaker 1>We have to hold folks accountable, and we also have

0:27:12.840 --> 0:27:16.400
<v Speaker 1>to invite those who have a stake in this, even

0:27:16.400 --> 0:27:19.840
<v Speaker 1>if they don't see themselves as activists who believe in democracy,

0:27:20.040 --> 0:27:23.160
<v Speaker 1>who believe in fairness, to actually speak up and put

0:27:23.200 --> 0:27:27.159
<v Speaker 1>their hand on the scale as well. Now, last question,

0:27:27.320 --> 0:27:30.359
<v Speaker 1>the reason, you know, the timing is critical. We're heading

0:27:30.359 --> 0:27:34.159
<v Speaker 1>into a mid term election in just a few days.

0:27:34.560 --> 0:27:36.280
<v Speaker 1>You know, talk to us about the importance of that

0:27:36.359 --> 0:27:38.160
<v Speaker 1>given you know, we're about to talk about a story

0:27:38.160 --> 0:27:44.720
<v Speaker 1>about mid term candidates amplifying misinformation, getting the most engagement. Now, well,

0:27:44.760 --> 0:27:47.960
<v Speaker 1>that's and that's not an accident. Right. The what we're

0:27:48.000 --> 0:27:52.800
<v Speaker 1>seeing in terms of missing disinformation is not UM a

0:27:52.960 --> 0:27:56.560
<v Speaker 1>car accidenty right, It's not just something that happens. It's manufactured.

0:27:56.960 --> 0:28:02.440
<v Speaker 1>And when the tech platforms choose growth in profit over safety,

0:28:02.480 --> 0:28:06.439
<v Speaker 1>integrity and security, they create an incentive structure where people

0:28:06.480 --> 0:28:08.800
<v Speaker 1>believe that they're gonna benefit from it and that there

0:28:08.800 --> 0:28:10.520
<v Speaker 1>will be rewards for it and there will not be

0:28:10.640 --> 0:28:13.760
<v Speaker 1>consequences for it. And so when I think about even

0:28:13.840 --> 0:28:17.240
<v Speaker 1>some of the changes that have been announced more recently, right,

0:28:17.440 --> 0:28:21.240
<v Speaker 1>the eight dollars per um per month, which can seem

0:28:21.280 --> 0:28:24.359
<v Speaker 1>almost fair on its face that um Elon Musk is

0:28:24.440 --> 0:28:27.560
<v Speaker 1>charging for verification, Well, if you're not going to verify

0:28:27.840 --> 0:28:31.000
<v Speaker 1>the identity, which he has not committed to, although he

0:28:31.040 --> 0:28:34.080
<v Speaker 1>did talk about verification of identity on the call that

0:28:34.119 --> 0:28:37.360
<v Speaker 1>we had on Tuesday. But all of the information coming

0:28:37.400 --> 0:28:39.080
<v Speaker 1>out now is that they will not have time to

0:28:39.160 --> 0:28:42.880
<v Speaker 1>develop a verification UM system before they roll it out.

0:28:43.320 --> 0:28:47.360
<v Speaker 1>They can have folks claiming to be verified UM and

0:28:47.400 --> 0:28:52.640
<v Speaker 1>then renaming themselves CNN or Bloomberg renaming their names UM

0:28:52.760 --> 0:28:56.640
<v Speaker 1>under UM. The ausipicies of the Georgia's Secretary of State

0:28:56.920 --> 0:28:59.840
<v Speaker 1>and then making claims about the election under a very

0:29:00.040 --> 0:29:03.840
<v Speaker 1>high verified blue check because verification can be bought now

0:29:03.960 --> 0:29:07.480
<v Speaker 1>and not actually have some set level of accountability. We

0:29:07.680 --> 0:29:12.280
<v Speaker 1>watched after Elon Musk brought Twitter, the rise in the

0:29:12.400 --> 0:29:15.200
<v Speaker 1>use of the inn word because his followers believed that

0:29:15.280 --> 0:29:18.160
<v Speaker 1>they could now say that they could now move hateful

0:29:18.240 --> 0:29:20.760
<v Speaker 1>language on the platform because he would support it. We

0:29:20.840 --> 0:29:24.600
<v Speaker 1>have seen the increase of Q ANDN language in terms

0:29:24.680 --> 0:29:28.760
<v Speaker 1>on the platforms since he decided he was gonna buy

0:29:28.760 --> 0:29:32.720
<v Speaker 1>it back in April. Um over fifty of the counts

0:29:32.760 --> 0:29:36.800
<v Speaker 1>from mid October to now have UM that have been

0:29:36.840 --> 0:29:41.040
<v Speaker 1>amplifying Q and on um uh words and Q and

0:29:41.160 --> 0:29:45.880
<v Speaker 1>on phrases have have come on since Elon Musk announced

0:29:45.880 --> 0:29:48.479
<v Speaker 1>that he was gonna buy this buy this company. And

0:29:48.520 --> 0:29:52.080
<v Speaker 1>so we have watchful sort of the people around him,

0:29:52.120 --> 0:29:54.480
<v Speaker 1>the people who are fans of his, the people who

0:29:54.480 --> 0:29:57.480
<v Speaker 1>are supporting him, act out in ways. And then we've

0:29:57.560 --> 0:30:02.200
<v Speaker 1>watched Elon Musk validate that even his own behavior on

0:30:02.240 --> 0:30:07.880
<v Speaker 1>this platform, from amplifying an anti gay conspiracy theory against

0:30:08.000 --> 0:30:11.360
<v Speaker 1>Nancy Pelosi's husband to other things that he has tweeted

0:30:11.360 --> 0:30:14.320
<v Speaker 1>out since he has bought this company makes us all

0:30:14.400 --> 0:30:17.920
<v Speaker 1>have the question is he truly serious about leading this

0:30:18.040 --> 0:30:20.680
<v Speaker 1>company and and and a color Change. We have dealt

0:30:20.680 --> 0:30:24.760
<v Speaker 1>deeply with tech CEOs and signals across the board, and

0:30:24.840 --> 0:30:28.560
<v Speaker 1>I've never seen someone respond this way, So everyone should

0:30:28.600 --> 0:30:33.160
<v Speaker 1>be concerned. All right. Uh, to be fair, he did

0:30:33.200 --> 0:30:35.480
<v Speaker 1>delete that tweet, but you're right did come out in

0:30:35.520 --> 0:30:38.360
<v Speaker 1>the first place. Rashad Robinson, thanks for talking to us

0:30:38.400 --> 0:30:41.959
<v Speaker 1>about why this matters so much, President of Color of Change,

0:30:42.360 --> 0:30:58.320
<v Speaker 1>Thank you for stopping by for today's crypto report. We're

0:30:58.320 --> 0:31:02.480
<v Speaker 1>focusing on the web fundraising landscape of the top blockchain

0:31:02.600 --> 0:31:06.120
<v Speaker 1>venture capitalists. Bloom Shinali Bossik is in New York sale.

0:31:06.200 --> 0:31:08.120
<v Speaker 1>Thank you so much, Emily. I'm joined now by poly

0:31:08.240 --> 0:31:11.560
<v Speaker 1>Chain Capital general partner Naraj Pant. Polly Chain was created

0:31:11.560 --> 0:31:14.600
<v Speaker 1>in two dozen sixteen by Olaf Carson. We the third

0:31:14.640 --> 0:31:18.440
<v Speaker 1>employee at coin base. You know, Nag, Thank you so

0:31:18.560 --> 0:31:20.960
<v Speaker 1>much for your time, because you are seeing that you know,

0:31:21.080 --> 0:31:24.440
<v Speaker 1>little rally here and not just Bitcoin, You're seeing it

0:31:24.480 --> 0:31:27.000
<v Speaker 1>in a lot of alt coins. And I'd love your

0:31:27.200 --> 0:31:31.240
<v Speaker 1>perspective here in terms of how long that really holds

0:31:31.280 --> 0:31:33.280
<v Speaker 1>at a time that's been so volatile and whether that

0:31:33.320 --> 0:31:38.960
<v Speaker 1>even matters. Yeah, thank you Shinali. UM. I think the

0:31:38.960 --> 0:31:42.480
<v Speaker 1>big thing that we're focused on, you know, seeing sort

0:31:42.520 --> 0:31:45.400
<v Speaker 1>of how the markets have changed, is UM looking for

0:31:46.120 --> 0:31:50.360
<v Speaker 1>progress with with user adoption. I think our interest is

0:31:50.400 --> 0:31:55.280
<v Speaker 1>seeing the cryptocurrency space expand even more than it has today,

0:31:55.480 --> 0:31:59.000
<v Speaker 1>and we're excited to look at new UM, any new traction,

0:31:59.040 --> 0:32:01.640
<v Speaker 1>any new adoption, and so we hope that that kind

0:32:01.640 --> 0:32:04.000
<v Speaker 1>of takes place over the next couple of years as

0:32:04.000 --> 0:32:06.880
<v Speaker 1>we're investing into new companies. I'm kind of curious as

0:32:06.920 --> 0:32:09.240
<v Speaker 1>so what types of new investments you're willing to make

0:32:09.360 --> 0:32:12.840
<v Speaker 1>at this phase. Are there things you would avoid? Kind

0:32:12.840 --> 0:32:15.080
<v Speaker 1>of given the changes you're seeing in the market at large.

0:32:16.640 --> 0:32:20.720
<v Speaker 1>UM our strategy has remained relatively similar UM through both

0:32:20.760 --> 0:32:24.440
<v Speaker 1>bull and bear markets. UM. We've been around since and

0:32:24.480 --> 0:32:28.280
<v Speaker 1>have seen a number of different cycles, and what's important

0:32:28.320 --> 0:32:33.240
<v Speaker 1>to us is investing and hopefully generational companies and protocols

0:32:33.280 --> 0:32:36.600
<v Speaker 1>that I know we think can stand the test of time. UM.

0:32:36.640 --> 0:32:40.880
<v Speaker 1>We invest sort of across the space everywhere, from consumer

0:32:40.960 --> 0:32:45.080
<v Speaker 1>to infrastructure. UM. We think especially now, there's a lot

0:32:45.120 --> 0:32:50.560
<v Speaker 1>of exciting opportunities for infrastructure given the sort of slow

0:32:50.600 --> 0:32:53.280
<v Speaker 1>down in the markets. UM, we think this is a

0:32:53.320 --> 0:32:56.400
<v Speaker 1>good time for developers to come in and prepare for

0:32:56.520 --> 0:33:00.440
<v Speaker 1>the next wave of usage and adoption such that we

0:33:00.480 --> 0:33:04.560
<v Speaker 1>can really let a lot of people use usecryptocurrencies. I'm

0:33:04.640 --> 0:33:07.280
<v Speaker 1>kind of curious here in terms of what you see

0:33:07.520 --> 0:33:11.800
<v Speaker 1>in terms of jobs and investing in new people in

0:33:11.920 --> 0:33:14.120
<v Speaker 1>different spaces in this industry. You know, it was just

0:33:14.120 --> 0:33:16.440
<v Speaker 1>a couple of days ago that we've reported that Galaxy

0:33:16.840 --> 0:33:20.160
<v Speaker 1>Digital would be cutting a significant amount of its workforce.

0:33:20.520 --> 0:33:22.440
<v Speaker 1>Do you think that the industry still faces a lot

0:33:22.480 --> 0:33:26.680
<v Speaker 1>more pain when it comes to the workforce. UM. I

0:33:26.720 --> 0:33:31.880
<v Speaker 1>think we're lucky in that One important exciting trend about

0:33:31.920 --> 0:33:35.040
<v Speaker 1>a lot of crypto companies is that they don't require

0:33:35.040 --> 0:33:38.240
<v Speaker 1>as many employees to run. I think where we see

0:33:38.440 --> 0:33:42.360
<v Speaker 1>a lot of large Web two companies UM struggle is

0:33:42.400 --> 0:33:45.479
<v Speaker 1>that they often overhire and hire a lot more than

0:33:45.520 --> 0:33:48.080
<v Speaker 1>they need to run the service. I think a great

0:33:48.160 --> 0:33:50.480
<v Speaker 1>part of the Web three space is that many of

0:33:50.520 --> 0:33:53.920
<v Speaker 1>these protocols and companies are are run on Ethereum or

0:33:53.960 --> 0:33:57.880
<v Speaker 1>run on another large protocol and allows these teams to

0:33:57.960 --> 0:34:00.800
<v Speaker 1>operate a lot more leanly and and just with less

0:34:00.800 --> 0:34:04.000
<v Speaker 1>people overall. UM. So, while we still want to be

0:34:04.040 --> 0:34:07.800
<v Speaker 1>cautious in our approach and advising all our portfolio companies

0:34:07.840 --> 0:34:12.480
<v Speaker 1>not to be too um braws and about hiring and

0:34:12.520 --> 0:34:15.160
<v Speaker 1>spending UM. We do think that this is a great

0:34:15.200 --> 0:34:18.040
<v Speaker 1>sort of structural change in the way that Web three

0:34:18.040 --> 0:34:20.600
<v Speaker 1>companies are relative to to sort of Web two companies.

0:34:20.640 --> 0:34:23.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm glad you brought up Ethereum in that answer, because

0:34:23.440 --> 0:34:25.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm curious about what you think about Ethereum post emerge

0:34:26.080 --> 0:34:28.360
<v Speaker 1>and what does it mean in terms of its competition

0:34:28.360 --> 0:34:32.400
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to Bitcoin. We're seeing a lot of

0:34:32.440 --> 0:34:37.160
<v Speaker 1>exciting development happened on the on the Ethereum blockchain, both

0:34:37.160 --> 0:34:41.680
<v Speaker 1>from Ethereum itself, seeing the new East to Merge happened successfully,

0:34:42.120 --> 0:34:46.600
<v Speaker 1>seeing developers continuing to build applications, continuing to see a

0:34:46.680 --> 0:34:50.520
<v Speaker 1>lot of demand for everything from defied and f T

0:34:50.840 --> 0:34:54.799
<v Speaker 1>s UM and even transactions. And we're seeing a lot

0:34:54.840 --> 0:34:59.400
<v Speaker 1>of interesting opportunities being built around ethereum um. This includes

0:34:59.440 --> 0:35:03.239
<v Speaker 1>things like um what are called Layer two's roll ups

0:35:03.280 --> 0:35:07.920
<v Speaker 1>that allow you to scale transaction capacity even further UM,

0:35:07.960 --> 0:35:12.319
<v Speaker 1>seeing new privacy applications being built and and overall also

0:35:12.360 --> 0:35:16.720
<v Speaker 1>seeing a lot of traction from traditional companies hoping to

0:35:16.880 --> 0:35:19.960
<v Speaker 1>tap into the web through market and Ethereum and it's

0:35:19.960 --> 0:35:22.640
<v Speaker 1>sort of related projects is the way for these companies

0:35:22.680 --> 0:35:26.120
<v Speaker 1>to do that. So we're overall very happy and excited

0:35:26.120 --> 0:35:29.320
<v Speaker 1>about developer adoption and continue to track it very closely

0:35:29.520 --> 0:35:32.720
<v Speaker 1>on on Ethereum. Earlier this year we did see a

0:35:32.719 --> 0:35:35.680
<v Speaker 1>wave of companies that got into liquidity issues or had

0:35:35.760 --> 0:35:38.839
<v Speaker 1>to pause withdrawals. You had exposure to at least one

0:35:38.880 --> 0:35:41.319
<v Speaker 1>of them, right coin flex. What was there to be

0:35:41.440 --> 0:35:46.400
<v Speaker 1>learned from all of that this year? I think, Uh,

0:35:47.480 --> 0:35:49.400
<v Speaker 1>these are good lessons to learn for the for the

0:35:49.400 --> 0:35:55.080
<v Speaker 1>space overall. I think, UM, they teach these companies risk management,

0:35:55.680 --> 0:35:58.719
<v Speaker 1>and I think in some ways the failures we saw

0:35:58.760 --> 0:36:01.120
<v Speaker 1>in the space, we're not because as a web three

0:36:01.120 --> 0:36:05.240
<v Speaker 1>protocols and the smart contracts didn't work or anything like that,

0:36:05.520 --> 0:36:08.560
<v Speaker 1>but they were a failure of the meat space agreements,

0:36:08.600 --> 0:36:12.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, the real world legal contracts attesting to a

0:36:12.800 --> 0:36:15.840
<v Speaker 1>u M or attesting to UM proof of funds or

0:36:15.880 --> 0:36:18.640
<v Speaker 1>anything like that. In a number of cases UM, that

0:36:18.760 --> 0:36:21.680
<v Speaker 1>was what really failed UM. And so in some ways

0:36:21.719 --> 0:36:24.680
<v Speaker 1>it's highlighting systemic risks that exists not only in the

0:36:24.760 --> 0:36:27.640
<v Speaker 1>in the crypto financial space, but in the broader financial

0:36:27.640 --> 0:36:31.520
<v Speaker 1>industry as a whole, So I think it overalls strengthenings

0:36:31.560 --> 0:36:36.279
<v Speaker 1>both defy but also the crypto and financial space as

0:36:36.280 --> 0:36:39.839
<v Speaker 1>a whole. That's probably chained Capital's partner near agepan Take.

0:36:39.920 --> 0:36:41.520
<v Speaker 1>Thank you so much for your time. Back to you

0:36:41.520 --> 0:36:47.600
<v Speaker 1>in San franciscanly Shinios, thank you so much. Coming up,

0:36:48.360 --> 0:36:52.240
<v Speaker 1>as the mid terms are fast approaching, what's the impact

0:36:52.360 --> 0:36:56.799
<v Speaker 1>of misinformation still running on checked online, like the falsehood

0:36:57.120 --> 0:37:01.560
<v Speaker 1>that Donald Trump won election? Our social media companies doing

0:37:01.600 --> 0:37:17.640
<v Speaker 1>about it. We're going to talk about that next, all right,

0:37:17.640 --> 0:37:19.640
<v Speaker 1>don't want to continue our conversation now about the mid

0:37:19.800 --> 0:37:23.600
<v Speaker 1>terms and content moderation, and not just on Twitter, We're

0:37:23.640 --> 0:37:27.359
<v Speaker 1>also talking about Facebook and YouTube and other platforms. After

0:37:27.400 --> 0:37:31.280
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg analyzed hundreds of candidates social media posts and found

0:37:31.680 --> 0:37:37.080
<v Speaker 1>rampant misinformation, Bloomberg's Jack Gillum poured through it all and

0:37:37.160 --> 0:37:40.080
<v Speaker 1>joins us now for more on his research, Jack, what

0:37:40.160 --> 0:37:46.640
<v Speaker 1>did you find about candidates amplifying misinformation, specifically the big lie?

0:37:47.400 --> 0:37:51.280
<v Speaker 1>How many of them are actually doing this? So emily,

0:37:51.320 --> 0:37:53.040
<v Speaker 1>we took a look at all of the republic and

0:37:53.040 --> 0:37:56.800
<v Speaker 1>candidates running for not just Congress but Secretary of State,

0:37:56.840 --> 0:38:00.359
<v Speaker 1>which oversees the vote count governor's attorneys general in all

0:38:00.400 --> 0:38:03.160
<v Speaker 1>the states across the country, and we found a hundred

0:38:03.160 --> 0:38:06.799
<v Speaker 1>and sixty candidates have been pushing what use called the

0:38:06.840 --> 0:38:09.960
<v Speaker 1>big live this is this you know, false theory or

0:38:09.960 --> 0:38:12.840
<v Speaker 1>this this this conspiracy theory and theory almost that Donald

0:38:12.840 --> 0:38:15.960
<v Speaker 1>Trump won the election, that Joe Biden is a diligiti

0:38:16.000 --> 0:38:18.279
<v Speaker 1>and president um. And So what we did is we

0:38:18.320 --> 0:38:20.920
<v Speaker 1>wanted to look at how these candidates running for office,

0:38:20.960 --> 0:38:23.200
<v Speaker 1>some of whom very well might went on Tuesday night,

0:38:24.000 --> 0:38:28.640
<v Speaker 1>actually pushed the meshes on platforms, especially now that Twitter

0:38:28.719 --> 0:38:31.640
<v Speaker 1>has a new owner, Facebook might not be labeling all

0:38:31.640 --> 0:38:33.359
<v Speaker 1>these ads, and we wanted to get a closer look

0:38:33.360 --> 0:38:37.760
<v Speaker 1>at what was really happening. So how did the companies

0:38:37.880 --> 0:38:42.320
<v Speaker 1>respond when you went to them with this? So Twitter

0:38:42.400 --> 0:38:45.120
<v Speaker 1>did not respond for comment. UM. We're not sure if

0:38:45.160 --> 0:38:48.600
<v Speaker 1>that's because the communications team either some folks were laid

0:38:48.640 --> 0:38:50.480
<v Speaker 1>off in the massive wayoffs has been happening in the

0:38:50.560 --> 0:38:54.960
<v Speaker 1>last day. UM. Facebook essentially said, look, we deal with

0:38:55.000 --> 0:38:57.160
<v Speaker 1>the you know, in their view, I guess the larger

0:38:57.200 --> 0:39:01.080
<v Speaker 1>issues preventing people from voting, violence, those sorts of things,

0:39:01.080 --> 0:39:04.120
<v Speaker 1>and that they run ads really encouraging people to vote

0:39:04.120 --> 0:39:07.399
<v Speaker 1>for and to say that, look, there's really not election misinformation.

0:39:07.480 --> 0:39:10.080
<v Speaker 1>This is the real deal. Um. But I think the

0:39:10.160 --> 0:39:12.680
<v Speaker 1>real questions you're going forward is why a lot of

0:39:12.680 --> 0:39:14.759
<v Speaker 1>these ads weren't flagged. And we did, in fact find

0:39:14.840 --> 0:39:18.080
<v Speaker 1>one ad by carry Lake, the Republican nominate for governor

0:39:18.120 --> 0:39:21.000
<v Speaker 1>of Arizona, where one of her false election claims was

0:39:21.040 --> 0:39:24.520
<v Speaker 1>actually flagged by Facebook, but the majority, in fact, almost

0:39:24.560 --> 0:39:29.719
<v Speaker 1>all the other ones we found were not. So just

0:39:29.840 --> 0:39:33.879
<v Speaker 1>three days to go before the election, how are you

0:39:33.960 --> 0:39:38.919
<v Speaker 1>expecting potential, you know, amplification of this to ramp up

0:39:39.440 --> 0:39:42.840
<v Speaker 1>before November eight? I mean, it's no secret that social

0:39:42.880 --> 0:39:45.880
<v Speaker 1>media is an important avenue that hundreds of millions of

0:39:45.880 --> 0:39:49.760
<v Speaker 1>Americans used. It's no secret also by that extent that Russia,

0:39:50.200 --> 0:39:53.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, really tried to hijack that in seen ahead

0:39:53.040 --> 0:39:55.640
<v Speaker 1>of that election. Um. I think this is going to

0:39:55.719 --> 0:39:57.600
<v Speaker 1>be an interesting thing to watch, is that we have

0:39:58.160 --> 0:40:00.440
<v Speaker 1>a new ownership at Twitter and what they're going to

0:40:00.480 --> 0:40:03.440
<v Speaker 1>do in terms of content moderation. We have Facebook that

0:40:03.520 --> 0:40:05.839
<v Speaker 1>has not labeled a lot of these ads that are

0:40:05.880 --> 0:40:09.480
<v Speaker 1>clear pieces of misinformation about election. I think it's going

0:40:09.520 --> 0:40:13.000
<v Speaker 1>to be a real interesting picture of how that misinformation

0:40:13.080 --> 0:40:15.160
<v Speaker 1>might play out in terms of votes, by the way,

0:40:15.200 --> 0:40:17.760
<v Speaker 1>not just being cast on Tuesday, but in the states

0:40:17.760 --> 0:40:20.759
<v Speaker 1>like Arizona with mail and balloting and early voting are

0:40:20.800 --> 0:40:25.440
<v Speaker 1>going on right now. So you know, what are you

0:40:25.440 --> 0:40:29.640
<v Speaker 1>expecting to happen next here, especially as you know these

0:40:29.640 --> 0:40:33.160
<v Speaker 1>elections are happening the ad industry and turmoil. These companies,

0:40:33.200 --> 0:40:35.520
<v Speaker 1>whether it's because of Elon Mosk or you know, a

0:40:35.520 --> 0:40:40.640
<v Speaker 1>broader economic slowdown, are kind of scrambling for revenue. I

0:40:40.640 --> 0:40:42.759
<v Speaker 1>think I think that's a good question, Emily. I think

0:40:42.760 --> 0:40:44.920
<v Speaker 1>what we're going to happen here is that you have

0:40:45.280 --> 0:40:46.880
<v Speaker 1>these companies that are going to have to grapple with

0:40:46.920 --> 0:40:50.280
<v Speaker 1>a serious issue of misinformation. It's one that has taken

0:40:50.800 --> 0:40:53.520
<v Speaker 1>hold in the Republican Party that we found in this

0:40:53.600 --> 0:40:56.799
<v Speaker 1>analysis again, so we'll just see what's going to happen

0:40:56.840 --> 0:41:01.840
<v Speaker 1>to come Tuesday. Jack Gillub, thank you so much for

0:41:01.920 --> 0:41:04.120
<v Speaker 1>your reporting. And that does it for this edition of

0:41:04.120 --> 0:41:06.719
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Technology. I'm Emily changing in San Francisco. Have a

0:41:06.760 --> 0:41:10.839
<v Speaker 1>wonderful weekend everyone. Brendan Carr will join us next week.

0:41:11.440 --> 0:41:12.200
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg