WEBVTT - Internet Folklore and Misinformation

0:00:04.240 --> 0:00:07.240
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to tex Stuff, a production of I Heart Radios

0:00:07.320 --> 0:00:14.320
<v Speaker 1>How Stuff Works. Hey there, and welcome to tech Stuff.

0:00:14.360 --> 0:00:17.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm your host, Jonathan Strickland. I'm an executive producer with

0:00:17.440 --> 0:00:21.080
<v Speaker 1>iHeart Radio and I love all things tech, and today

0:00:21.200 --> 0:00:24.520
<v Speaker 1>we're going to cover an interesting topic. There was a

0:00:24.560 --> 0:00:29.120
<v Speaker 1>suggestion from Shaye Lee. And you might remember Shay in

0:00:29.200 --> 0:00:35.600
<v Speaker 1>her alter ego as al Amona, who sabotaged my episode

0:00:35.600 --> 0:00:41.040
<v Speaker 1>about how matches work, and now she's back. Hi, Shay Hi,

0:00:41.400 --> 0:00:44.839
<v Speaker 1>I heard Alimona ran off with the quister. Yeah, that's

0:00:44.880 --> 0:00:49.080
<v Speaker 1>the union made in. They're just gonna burn it all

0:00:49.120 --> 0:00:53.200
<v Speaker 1>to the ground, burn it all down. So to give

0:00:53.240 --> 0:00:55.960
<v Speaker 1>some background on what this episode is all about, Shaye

0:00:56.000 --> 0:00:57.840
<v Speaker 1>reached out to me and asked if I had ever

0:00:57.880 --> 0:01:02.120
<v Speaker 1>done an episode about a specific piece of internet folklore

0:01:02.280 --> 0:01:05.120
<v Speaker 1>called aratus, and we're going to get to that. We

0:01:05.160 --> 0:01:09.000
<v Speaker 1>communicate in stories and your traditional folklore. These are the

0:01:09.040 --> 0:01:12.160
<v Speaker 1>tales that are passed around. Typically they're not even written

0:01:12.160 --> 0:01:15.560
<v Speaker 1>down there, their oral traditions. It's told around the campfire.

0:01:15.959 --> 0:01:19.240
<v Speaker 1>And now the campfires turned into creepy pasta, yes, which

0:01:19.280 --> 0:01:22.959
<v Speaker 1>we will talk about. So you know that that also

0:01:23.400 --> 0:01:26.959
<v Speaker 1>developed into things that we call urban legends. Urban leges

0:01:27.000 --> 0:01:29.520
<v Speaker 1>is just another type of folklore. But it was a

0:01:29.600 --> 0:01:33.960
<v Speaker 1>subset of folklore that kind of grew into as we

0:01:34.000 --> 0:01:37.200
<v Speaker 1>started to see the industrial revolution. We saw people move

0:01:37.319 --> 0:01:39.160
<v Speaker 1>to the cities. You know, it became less of an

0:01:39.160 --> 0:01:42.720
<v Speaker 1>agrarian world, and a lot lots of the uh, A

0:01:42.720 --> 0:01:44.720
<v Speaker 1>lot of regions in the around the world became more

0:01:44.920 --> 0:01:51.320
<v Speaker 1>urban and less agrarian, and a different set of folklore

0:01:51.360 --> 0:01:53.680
<v Speaker 1>tales started to arise. A lot of them are like

0:01:53.840 --> 0:01:59.720
<v Speaker 1>tales of warning. Yeah, you say, like don't trust strangers tales. Yes,

0:02:00.080 --> 0:02:01.880
<v Speaker 1>a lot of morality tales too, Yeah, a lot of

0:02:01.960 --> 0:02:04.360
<v Speaker 1>them are like, see what happens if you do this

0:02:04.400 --> 0:02:07.520
<v Speaker 1>thing that breaks our social morays? You will suffer like

0:02:07.560 --> 0:02:10.000
<v Speaker 1>these people did. Yeah, see what happens when you take

0:02:10.280 --> 0:02:15.040
<v Speaker 1>candy and or apples from strange women in the woods, right, right,

0:02:15.080 --> 0:02:17.639
<v Speaker 1>Except now it's like when you're going trick or treating,

0:02:17.639 --> 0:02:19.320
<v Speaker 1>if you don't check all the candy, you're going to

0:02:19.400 --> 0:02:21.720
<v Speaker 1>end up with razor blades and poison. Right. Yeah, I've

0:02:21.760 --> 0:02:24.520
<v Speaker 1>never found a razor blade in any of my candy. Yeah,

0:02:24.600 --> 0:02:27.919
<v Speaker 1>no one in my twenty seven years of trick or treating,

0:02:28.200 --> 0:02:31.280
<v Speaker 1>no one ever did until people started worrying about it,

0:02:31.320 --> 0:02:35.920
<v Speaker 1>and then people would yeah or like or like it

0:02:35.919 --> 0:02:38.359
<v Speaker 1>would be Oh I discovered this, and it turned out

0:02:38.360 --> 0:02:40.799
<v Speaker 1>that they had planted their own discovery that kind of thing,

0:02:40.960 --> 0:02:46.720
<v Speaker 1>kind of like the the murders. Yes. Yes, So one

0:02:46.720 --> 0:02:49.080
<v Speaker 1>of the things I wanted to to kind of allude

0:02:49.120 --> 0:02:52.040
<v Speaker 1>to to kind of set the stage for the stuff

0:02:52.040 --> 0:02:54.280
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna talk about today, which is the more internet

0:02:54.280 --> 0:02:57.120
<v Speaker 1>based stuff. I'm just going to give an example of

0:02:57.120 --> 0:02:59.440
<v Speaker 1>one of my favorite urban legends of all time. It's

0:02:59.480 --> 0:03:02.200
<v Speaker 1>a It's one that's been told a billion different times.

0:03:02.360 --> 0:03:05.600
<v Speaker 1>It's been written in lots of different anthologies. Shay, you'll

0:03:05.639 --> 0:03:09.200
<v Speaker 1>appreciate this. When I was in uh elementary school and

0:03:09.280 --> 0:03:11.960
<v Speaker 1>middle school, the books I checked out the most in

0:03:12.080 --> 0:03:17.320
<v Speaker 1>my school library, we're all about urban legends, ghosts, and

0:03:17.480 --> 0:03:21.320
<v Speaker 1>other types of paranormal, supernatural kind of stuff. We have

0:03:21.440 --> 0:03:23.280
<v Speaker 1>that in common because I did the exact same thing.

0:03:24.320 --> 0:03:28.680
<v Speaker 1>I stopped believing in it. So that's where our path divulge, No,

0:03:29.160 --> 0:03:33.480
<v Speaker 1>so diverted, I should say. So. The story I want

0:03:33.480 --> 0:03:37.520
<v Speaker 1>to tell is the Vanishing Hitchhecker story. Classic story. So

0:03:38.000 --> 0:03:41.480
<v Speaker 1>the basic version of the story goes, a guy's driving

0:03:41.600 --> 0:03:45.560
<v Speaker 1>down a road, a dark country road at night. The

0:03:45.680 --> 0:03:48.200
<v Speaker 1>rain is coming down really hard, it's hard to see,

0:03:48.560 --> 0:03:51.600
<v Speaker 1>and as he's driving down the road, he sees a

0:03:51.680 --> 0:03:54.840
<v Speaker 1>young woman walking along the side the road, and so,

0:03:55.040 --> 0:03:59.000
<v Speaker 1>not wanting her to get totally frozen out in the

0:03:59.120 --> 0:04:02.320
<v Speaker 1>pouring rain, he pulls over and offers her a ride,

0:04:02.320 --> 0:04:04.119
<v Speaker 1>and she gets in the back seat of his car,

0:04:04.600 --> 0:04:07.720
<v Speaker 1>and out of a sense of a concern for her,

0:04:08.040 --> 0:04:12.720
<v Speaker 1>he gives her his jacket to wrap around herself, and

0:04:12.760 --> 0:04:15.680
<v Speaker 1>then she gives him an address, and so he starts

0:04:15.720 --> 0:04:18.719
<v Speaker 1>to drive, and otherwise she doesn't really communicate with him.

0:04:18.839 --> 0:04:20.880
<v Speaker 1>He gets to the address. When he gets there, he

0:04:20.920 --> 0:04:23.240
<v Speaker 1>looks in the back seat and the girl's gone, and

0:04:23.320 --> 0:04:25.880
<v Speaker 1>he never heard the car door open or anything. He

0:04:26.080 --> 0:04:29.120
<v Speaker 1>doesn't know what happened, and his jacket is gone as well.

0:04:29.279 --> 0:04:32.719
<v Speaker 1>There's just a like a the seats wet from where

0:04:32.760 --> 0:04:35.640
<v Speaker 1>she had been because of the pouring rain, but otherwise

0:04:35.680 --> 0:04:38.480
<v Speaker 1>there's no indication. So he goes to the house where

0:04:38.480 --> 0:04:40.800
<v Speaker 1>he had the address and knocks on the door to

0:04:40.839 --> 0:04:44.320
<v Speaker 1>find out what the heck is going on. Woman answers

0:04:44.320 --> 0:04:46.800
<v Speaker 1>the door. Typically it's a woman in this in this legend,

0:04:47.120 --> 0:04:50.919
<v Speaker 1>he explains what has happened. The woman goes pale and says,

0:04:52.480 --> 0:04:55.320
<v Speaker 1>no one by that description lives here. But there was

0:04:55.400 --> 0:04:58.599
<v Speaker 1>a young woman whose family lived here before us, but

0:04:58.760 --> 0:05:02.520
<v Speaker 1>she died years ago and she's buried at such and

0:05:02.600 --> 0:05:07.080
<v Speaker 1>such cemetery. So he goes to the cemetery, and when

0:05:07.120 --> 0:05:10.240
<v Speaker 1>he comes up on the grave of the young woman,

0:05:10.839 --> 0:05:16.120
<v Speaker 1>there's his jacket resting on her gravestone vanishing. Hi. Oh,

0:05:16.279 --> 0:05:21.160
<v Speaker 1>and it's considerate to leave his jacket behind. Yeah, Otherwise

0:05:21.160 --> 0:05:23.560
<v Speaker 1>she's up with teen angel and looking at rings and

0:05:23.640 --> 0:05:26.080
<v Speaker 1>jackets that are just an accumulation of wealth that they've

0:05:26.080 --> 0:05:29.040
<v Speaker 1>had over the years. I remember that movie vaguely. Well,

0:05:29.080 --> 0:05:31.640
<v Speaker 1>I was talking about the song, but there's a whole

0:05:31.839 --> 0:05:36.240
<v Speaker 1>genre of music that's dedicated to teenagers dying. So that's

0:05:36.279 --> 0:05:39.120
<v Speaker 1>an example of an urban legend. It's one that's been told. Like,

0:05:39.160 --> 0:05:42.440
<v Speaker 1>there's lots of variations. Well, the Internet has its own

0:05:42.640 --> 0:05:44.880
<v Speaker 1>versions of this, and we're also going to talk about

0:05:44.920 --> 0:05:50.359
<v Speaker 1>in this episode how the Internet reinforces the communication of

0:05:50.400 --> 0:05:54.120
<v Speaker 1>these stories and reinforces people's belief in it, largely through

0:05:54.520 --> 0:05:58.400
<v Speaker 1>the behavior of those who are sharing the stories and

0:05:58.520 --> 0:06:04.040
<v Speaker 1>also the way the platform themselves work. So you mentioned

0:06:04.080 --> 0:06:09.279
<v Speaker 1>creepy pasta. Let's explain what creepy pasta is, and I

0:06:09.279 --> 0:06:13.080
<v Speaker 1>guess first we have to explain what copy pasta is,

0:06:13.120 --> 0:06:17.479
<v Speaker 1>because creepy pasta is a subset of copy pasta. Before

0:06:17.680 --> 0:06:19.760
<v Speaker 1>I learned it from you, I actually didn't know that

0:06:19.800 --> 0:06:22.520
<v Speaker 1>creepy pasta was a subset of copy pasta. I just

0:06:22.560 --> 0:06:24.800
<v Speaker 1>thought it was its own thing, just the name of

0:06:24.839 --> 0:06:29.000
<v Speaker 1>a forum, because no one ever talks about copy pasta anymore.

0:06:29.200 --> 0:06:33.680
<v Speaker 1>But the it's it's a sort of a portmanteau of

0:06:33.920 --> 0:06:36.920
<v Speaker 1>copy paste, right, and it's the fact that a lot

0:06:36.920 --> 0:06:38.760
<v Speaker 1>of people to share stories. What they would do is

0:06:38.800 --> 0:06:42.040
<v Speaker 1>they would find something on the Internet that was interesting,

0:06:42.160 --> 0:06:45.800
<v Speaker 1>maybe in a message board or whatever, copy it and

0:06:45.839 --> 0:06:49.560
<v Speaker 1>then paste into some other message board or whatever, and

0:06:49.600 --> 0:06:53.880
<v Speaker 1>that's yeah. Usually there was no attribution, like I often

0:06:53.920 --> 0:06:56.640
<v Speaker 1>expelled for that if I tried that. Well, they weren't

0:06:56.640 --> 0:06:59.240
<v Speaker 1>necessarily they weren't necessarily trying to pass it off as

0:06:59.279 --> 0:07:02.799
<v Speaker 1>their own work, but rather like I saw this crazy

0:07:02.880 --> 0:07:05.920
<v Speaker 1>story or this funny joke or whatever it might be.

0:07:06.960 --> 0:07:09.200
<v Speaker 1>But sometimes when you're doing that copy and basing, well

0:07:09.240 --> 0:07:11.640
<v Speaker 1>one you might lose the attribution, so you don't know

0:07:11.680 --> 0:07:15.960
<v Speaker 1>who originated the thing and to sometimes you lose the context,

0:07:16.120 --> 0:07:20.720
<v Speaker 1>like is this a joke? Is it a piece of fiction?

0:07:21.200 --> 0:07:23.280
<v Speaker 1>Is it supposed to be an account of something that

0:07:23.320 --> 0:07:29.760
<v Speaker 1>actually happened. Creepy pasta is a subset where it's specifically

0:07:29.840 --> 0:07:34.640
<v Speaker 1>about spooky, creepy paranormal typically kind of stuff, but not

0:07:34.720 --> 0:07:40.520
<v Speaker 1>necessarily paranormal, but often paranormal, or like the unnamed serial

0:07:40.600 --> 0:07:44.520
<v Speaker 1>killers of Yeah, like the hook that's hanging on the

0:07:44.560 --> 0:07:47.400
<v Speaker 1>card door, that kind of just the killer. Do you

0:07:47.440 --> 0:07:49.680
<v Speaker 1>know who Jeff Jeff the Killer. I do not know

0:07:49.680 --> 0:07:52.000
<v Speaker 1>who Jeff the Killer is. Jeff the Killer is weird

0:07:52.040 --> 0:07:54.480
<v Speaker 1>because it's in his name. Yeah, you would think, well,

0:07:54.600 --> 0:08:00.760
<v Speaker 1>Jeff the Killer is a Baker obviously, listen, sorry, listen,

0:08:00.800 --> 0:08:06.160
<v Speaker 1>my dad was Jeff the Killer Jeff Baker. And um,

0:08:06.280 --> 0:08:09.000
<v Speaker 1>kind of a boogeyman type story, very like how he

0:08:09.040 --> 0:08:11.880
<v Speaker 1>comes into your room if you don't share this, or

0:08:11.920 --> 0:08:14.440
<v Speaker 1>if you share it a number of times or YadA yadya,

0:08:15.120 --> 0:08:20.160
<v Speaker 1>and um that for me, the story isn't what's important.

0:08:20.200 --> 0:08:21.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure you've seen pictures of him when you're just

0:08:22.000 --> 0:08:24.000
<v Speaker 1>scrolling through Facebook. Have you seen like the picture it's

0:08:24.040 --> 0:08:27.640
<v Speaker 1>like a big white creepy face that it's been so

0:08:28.360 --> 0:08:30.960
<v Speaker 1>edited that there's like no nose and just a big

0:08:30.960 --> 0:08:33.520
<v Speaker 1>creepy smile and huge eyes, and it usually has like

0:08:33.559 --> 0:08:36.160
<v Speaker 1>a caption that says, go to sleep under it, or

0:08:36.520 --> 0:08:39.800
<v Speaker 1>I probably have. Yeah, I've seen a lot on the internet.

0:08:40.080 --> 0:08:42.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't remember most of it. But um, so, Jeff

0:08:42.960 --> 0:08:45.560
<v Speaker 1>the Killer. There's many incarnations of Jeff the Killer. There's

0:08:45.600 --> 0:08:48.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, the creepy guy that comes into your bedroom

0:08:48.120 --> 0:08:51.640
<v Speaker 1>and kills you and all that. Oh yeah, you know,

0:08:51.800 --> 0:08:57.400
<v Speaker 1>he's so inconvenient and inconsiderate, but um they're because of

0:08:57.400 --> 0:09:00.800
<v Speaker 1>creepy Pasta and just all the threads abut Jeff the Killer.

0:09:00.840 --> 0:09:04.360
<v Speaker 1>There were Jeff the Killer fan girls that would draw

0:09:04.480 --> 0:09:09.520
<v Speaker 1>a little like a little romantic, you know, heart images

0:09:09.600 --> 0:09:12.880
<v Speaker 1>of him as as Yeah, as if that's like they're

0:09:14.240 --> 0:09:18.400
<v Speaker 1>they're brad Pitt that this is this is messed up.

0:09:17.520 --> 0:09:21.160
<v Speaker 1>So we wanted to talk a little bit about a

0:09:21.200 --> 0:09:23.960
<v Speaker 1>couple of examples of creepypasta. This is just the beginning

0:09:24.080 --> 0:09:26.439
<v Speaker 1>of this episode. Two each each section we're going to

0:09:26.559 --> 0:09:29.880
<v Speaker 1>talk about a different kind of subset of Internet folklore.

0:09:30.559 --> 0:09:34.720
<v Speaker 1>But creepy Pasta is one that is pretty easy to reference,

0:09:35.440 --> 0:09:40.080
<v Speaker 1>and uh, one example of it although it didn't necessarily

0:09:40.200 --> 0:09:43.960
<v Speaker 1>start as creepy pasta itself, because creepy pasta tends to

0:09:43.960 --> 0:09:46.760
<v Speaker 1>be in the form of some sort of story. Um.

0:09:46.800 --> 0:09:49.319
<v Speaker 1>A lot of early types of creepypasta fell into one

0:09:49.320 --> 0:09:52.760
<v Speaker 1>of two categories. It was a story about something that

0:09:53.040 --> 0:09:56.360
<v Speaker 1>supposedly happened to someone, and it could it could be

0:09:56.400 --> 0:09:58.640
<v Speaker 1>presented as fiction. You didn't have to present it as

0:09:58.679 --> 0:10:01.600
<v Speaker 1>if it were real, but it's it's given in that

0:10:01.640 --> 0:10:05.679
<v Speaker 1>sort of tale, or it was you know, lost episodes

0:10:06.080 --> 0:10:09.640
<v Speaker 1>of certain types of shows or movies or things that

0:10:09.640 --> 0:10:13.840
<v Speaker 1>that uh no longer are shown, but they do exist

0:10:14.280 --> 0:10:17.360
<v Speaker 1>and there's something creepy about what happened, Like it's that

0:10:17.440 --> 0:10:21.760
<v Speaker 1>one really dark episode of Gilligan's Island. There are versions

0:10:21.840 --> 0:10:24.400
<v Speaker 1>of of it. Now that that particular style of creepy

0:10:24.440 --> 0:10:28.079
<v Speaker 1>pasta fell out of favor fairly quickly, Like it was

0:10:28.160 --> 0:10:30.960
<v Speaker 1>kind of like a creepy version of fan fiction. But

0:10:31.400 --> 0:10:36.120
<v Speaker 1>one of the most prominent examples is slender Man, which

0:10:36.160 --> 0:10:38.599
<v Speaker 1>didn't start off, as I said, as creepy pasta. It

0:10:38.679 --> 0:10:42.280
<v Speaker 1>started off as kind of an exercise. Uh. There was

0:10:42.840 --> 0:10:48.200
<v Speaker 1>the Something Awful forums forum board on the Internet, so

0:10:48.200 --> 0:10:51.560
<v Speaker 1>people would get together and have conversations about different topics,

0:10:51.800 --> 0:10:54.679
<v Speaker 1>and this was particularly in a thread that was titled

0:10:54.840 --> 0:10:59.360
<v Speaker 1>create Paranormal Images. So it's just people trying to use

0:10:59.400 --> 0:11:04.160
<v Speaker 1>photoshop to create images that were unsettling or had some

0:11:04.200 --> 0:11:09.600
<v Speaker 1>sort of alien or paranormal aspect to them, Like the

0:11:09.640 --> 0:11:11.920
<v Speaker 1>idea like make something that if you were to look

0:11:11.960 --> 0:11:14.200
<v Speaker 1>at people would go like, ooh, that's what is that?

0:11:14.200 --> 0:11:19.160
<v Speaker 1>That's creepy. Yeah. So this guy named Eric Knudson created

0:11:20.040 --> 0:11:24.640
<v Speaker 1>a a picture of an elongated, like an unnaturally tall,

0:11:24.679 --> 0:11:30.679
<v Speaker 1>unnaturally thin figure with an odd like obscured face, and

0:11:31.240 --> 0:11:33.960
<v Speaker 1>it became known as the slender Man. He also included

0:11:34.000 --> 0:11:37.480
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of flavor text to kind of give

0:11:37.559 --> 0:11:43.559
<v Speaker 1>some very shifty background on this character and attaching him

0:11:43.600 --> 0:11:48.160
<v Speaker 1>to the fictional fire. And then the Internet took that

0:11:49.679 --> 0:11:53.360
<v Speaker 1>boy Haldy. Yeah. So there were all these different people

0:11:53.400 --> 0:11:59.400
<v Speaker 1>who contributed to flushing out the mythology behind slender Man.

0:12:00.200 --> 0:12:03.800
<v Speaker 1>So the legend of Slenderman grew online, right, and it's

0:12:03.840 --> 0:12:08.319
<v Speaker 1>on all these different communities and people within that thread

0:12:08.800 --> 0:12:11.240
<v Speaker 1>had already predicted that some of the images that were

0:12:11.280 --> 0:12:14.679
<v Speaker 1>being made were likely going to end up on websites

0:12:14.760 --> 0:12:18.760
<v Speaker 1>about the paranormal, but they would be submitted as if

0:12:18.800 --> 0:12:24.800
<v Speaker 1>they were genuine examples of evidence, as opposed to somebody

0:12:24.840 --> 0:12:29.319
<v Speaker 1>specifically crafted this and in fact that did happen, including

0:12:29.720 --> 0:12:33.000
<v Speaker 1>with slender Man. And so that's where we started seeing

0:12:34.080 --> 0:12:39.720
<v Speaker 1>more discussions about it, including people who are sure that

0:12:39.800 --> 0:12:43.600
<v Speaker 1>they had heard of this character before and in fact,

0:12:43.679 --> 0:12:45.720
<v Speaker 1>that was one of the points you wanted to make, right. Yeah,

0:12:46.160 --> 0:12:48.199
<v Speaker 1>I worked with a girl a couple of years ago,

0:12:48.280 --> 0:12:51.520
<v Speaker 1>about five years ago. She swore up and down that

0:12:51.600 --> 0:12:57.360
<v Speaker 1>she and a bunch of internet friends contributed to, uh,

0:12:57.559 --> 0:13:01.080
<v Speaker 1>the creation of slenderman um. Not I don't. She didn't

0:13:01.120 --> 0:13:04.360
<v Speaker 1>mention anything about the photoshop. But the way, if I

0:13:04.400 --> 0:13:07.280
<v Speaker 1>can remember it correctly, the way she presented it to

0:13:07.360 --> 0:13:11.600
<v Speaker 1>me was that she and a couple of friends were

0:13:11.640 --> 0:13:15.440
<v Speaker 1>just chatting over the Internet and somebody on the thread

0:13:15.520 --> 0:13:18.559
<v Speaker 1>or the forum said, hey, let's make a legend and

0:13:18.720 --> 0:13:21.360
<v Speaker 1>or let's make a let's let's make an urban legend.

0:13:22.160 --> 0:13:27.520
<v Speaker 1>And they probably already had their you know, base material

0:13:27.880 --> 0:13:32.880
<v Speaker 1>with the pictures and the other flavor text and stuff.

0:13:33.679 --> 0:13:35.800
<v Speaker 1>But she swears up and down that she contributed to

0:13:35.920 --> 0:13:40.360
<v Speaker 1>the creation of slenderman um. Red Letter Media believes that

0:13:40.400 --> 0:13:43.800
<v Speaker 1>they contributed to the creation of Slenderman. There's a video

0:13:44.280 --> 0:13:48.040
<v Speaker 1>called very appropriately did red Letter Media in Vince Slenderman

0:13:48.320 --> 0:13:51.000
<v Speaker 1>Um three guesses about what that video is, and it

0:13:51.040 --> 0:13:55.240
<v Speaker 1>was mostly done tongue in cheet. Yeah, but they their

0:13:55.520 --> 0:13:59.720
<v Speaker 1>criteria is that they made a short film that had

0:13:59.800 --> 0:14:03.160
<v Speaker 1>a character that was bald and war suit. Yeah, and

0:14:04.000 --> 0:14:06.280
<v Speaker 1>and he was ominous, so that makes him Slenderman. But

0:14:06.360 --> 0:14:11.160
<v Speaker 1>by that, by that criteria than like the Gentleman and

0:14:11.200 --> 0:14:14.960
<v Speaker 1>from Buffy are Slenderman from the episode Hush and the

0:14:15.040 --> 0:14:21.080
<v Speaker 1>silence from Yeah, he's Slenderman, and you know, ominous bald

0:14:21.120 --> 0:14:24.520
<v Speaker 1>guys your Slenderman? Dude, are you? Are you Slenderman? I'm

0:14:24.560 --> 0:14:27.680
<v Speaker 1>only I'm only ominous when I'm walking to work. When

0:14:27.680 --> 0:14:33.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm walking away from work, I'm whistling and I'm jaunty. Yeah. No,

0:14:33.360 --> 0:14:35.960
<v Speaker 1>that's a good point. And like when we were sort

0:14:36.000 --> 0:14:38.880
<v Speaker 1>of brainstorming this episode, one thing she said that really

0:14:38.880 --> 0:14:41.960
<v Speaker 1>stuck with me is like everybody made slender Man, Like

0:14:42.040 --> 0:14:44.000
<v Speaker 1>every Yeah, it was like one of those stories where

0:14:44.000 --> 0:14:46.680
<v Speaker 1>you're just like the Internet's baby. We all made him.

0:14:46.840 --> 0:14:50.400
<v Speaker 1>But but his actual creation date is something that we

0:14:50.440 --> 0:14:55.240
<v Speaker 1>can trace back to that photoshop thread, which we even

0:14:55.240 --> 0:14:57.720
<v Speaker 1>know when that was originally posted, which was June eight,

0:14:57.840 --> 0:15:00.960
<v Speaker 1>two thousand nine. It is so rare when you can

0:15:01.000 --> 0:15:05.880
<v Speaker 1>actually trace a legend back to its point of origin. Now, granted,

0:15:06.440 --> 0:15:10.400
<v Speaker 1>it grew much larger than that thread, and in fact

0:15:10.880 --> 0:15:16.720
<v Speaker 1>it even factors into a real world crime. And um,

0:15:17.280 --> 0:15:19.920
<v Speaker 1>this is what I'm sure anyone who's followed the story

0:15:19.920 --> 0:15:23.840
<v Speaker 1>of Slenderman knows about. There were a group of young

0:15:23.920 --> 0:15:28.080
<v Speaker 1>girls in Wisconsin and two They were all friends, and

0:15:28.160 --> 0:15:31.760
<v Speaker 1>two of the friends lured the third one out to

0:15:31.840 --> 0:15:35.760
<v Speaker 1>a remote location and then stabbed her. Uh. She fortunately

0:15:35.840 --> 0:15:40.360
<v Speaker 1>was survived the the attack and made a full recovery. Uh.

0:15:40.360 --> 0:15:46.960
<v Speaker 1>And the two attackers were committed to mental health institutions

0:15:47.120 --> 0:15:49.680
<v Speaker 1>for at least you know a while you said that

0:15:49.720 --> 0:15:52.680
<v Speaker 1>one of them is is currently coming up for parole soon.

0:15:52.880 --> 0:15:55.840
<v Speaker 1>I I didn't actually read the article on it. While

0:15:55.840 --> 0:16:00.840
<v Speaker 1>I was scrolling through the social media interwebs one day,

0:16:00.920 --> 0:16:03.200
<v Speaker 1>I saw an article. I didn't read the article, but

0:16:03.280 --> 0:16:07.640
<v Speaker 1>I saw the headline said, Um, one of them was

0:16:07.720 --> 0:16:11.200
<v Speaker 1>up for parole, and apparently the family of the victim

0:16:11.320 --> 0:16:15.080
<v Speaker 1>is not very happy about that. Understandably, so understandable. It

0:16:15.320 --> 0:16:18.320
<v Speaker 1>is certainly one of those stories where you feel awful

0:16:18.520 --> 0:16:23.360
<v Speaker 1>for everybody. You feel terrible for people who have lost

0:16:24.000 --> 0:16:26.320
<v Speaker 1>enough connection with reality to not be able to tell

0:16:26.360 --> 0:16:30.760
<v Speaker 1>the difference between a fantasy and what is actually real.

0:16:31.160 --> 0:16:33.680
<v Speaker 1>But then when you're a kid, that's that's a tough

0:16:33.720 --> 0:16:37.720
<v Speaker 1>distinction to make. Honestly, these days, as an adult, it

0:16:37.720 --> 0:16:39.960
<v Speaker 1>could be a pretty tough distinction to make. There's a

0:16:39.960 --> 0:16:42.400
<v Speaker 1>lot of misinformation out there, and the whole thing with

0:16:42.440 --> 0:16:45.520
<v Speaker 1>internet folklore is that the problem with it is that

0:16:46.280 --> 0:16:49.800
<v Speaker 1>so much of it seems real. It's presented as it's

0:16:49.840 --> 0:16:52.920
<v Speaker 1>completely sincere and real. Yeah, I mean, I would like

0:16:53.000 --> 0:16:57.160
<v Speaker 1>to think that I don't believe in a tall child

0:16:57.240 --> 0:17:01.880
<v Speaker 1>snatching bald guy, but I mean at late at night,

0:17:01.960 --> 0:17:05.000
<v Speaker 1>you see something like this and your imagination starts to

0:17:05.040 --> 0:17:08.000
<v Speaker 1>fill in gaps and then you know, you start to

0:17:08.359 --> 0:17:11.440
<v Speaker 1>you start to believe things that are not necessarily true

0:17:11.560 --> 0:17:15.080
<v Speaker 1>might be true. Yeah, we wanted to chat a little

0:17:15.119 --> 0:17:18.000
<v Speaker 1>bit about also a couple of other examples of creepy

0:17:18.040 --> 0:17:21.480
<v Speaker 1>pasta really quickly. And this next one was one that

0:17:21.800 --> 0:17:25.679
<v Speaker 1>surprised me because you also mentioned candle Cove, which I

0:17:25.680 --> 0:17:28.480
<v Speaker 1>had not heard of before you mentioned it. I hadn't

0:17:28.520 --> 0:17:31.880
<v Speaker 1>heard of anything about candle Cove until maybe a year

0:17:32.040 --> 0:17:35.080
<v Speaker 1>and a half ago. Um, I was just I was

0:17:35.119 --> 0:17:37.840
<v Speaker 1>at my mom's house one day visiting and she and

0:17:37.880 --> 0:17:41.159
<v Speaker 1>my stepdad were really into the show and it was

0:17:41.320 --> 0:17:43.320
<v Speaker 1>candle and it's the show I think it was on

0:17:44.240 --> 0:17:49.280
<v Speaker 1>SI Fi. There was there. It's their Channel zero series. Yeah,

0:17:49.280 --> 0:17:52.520
<v Speaker 1>that's what tripped me up. But yeah, it was a

0:17:52.520 --> 0:17:55.080
<v Speaker 1>show called Candle Cove and they were really into it,

0:17:55.720 --> 0:17:59.439
<v Speaker 1>and she was explaining to me, you know, the the premise,

0:17:59.640 --> 0:18:03.120
<v Speaker 1>the pres sounded familiar, so I don't know if I had,

0:18:03.480 --> 0:18:06.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, encountered the encounter the original, but I looked

0:18:06.680 --> 0:18:09.240
<v Speaker 1>it up because honestly, the reason I was looking it

0:18:09.320 --> 0:18:11.200
<v Speaker 1>up is that I recognized one of the actors from

0:18:11.240 --> 0:18:12.879
<v Speaker 1>Parks and rec and I wanted to figure out what

0:18:12.920 --> 0:18:15.040
<v Speaker 1>his name was. And as I was looking it up,

0:18:15.200 --> 0:18:18.440
<v Speaker 1>all the information about how Candle Cove started off as

0:18:19.440 --> 0:18:21.959
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it was on Creepy Pasta, but it was.

0:18:22.520 --> 0:18:26.160
<v Speaker 1>It was definitely a Creepy Pasta style story. Yes it was.

0:18:26.000 --> 0:18:28.159
<v Speaker 1>It was written by a guy named Chris Straub. And

0:18:28.200 --> 0:18:33.040
<v Speaker 1>what's funny is I've talked to Chris Straub personally years ago.

0:18:33.200 --> 0:18:36.680
<v Speaker 1>So Chris Straub is also a web comic list and

0:18:36.800 --> 0:18:39.280
<v Speaker 1>I wrote for how Stuff Works dot com. I wrote

0:18:39.320 --> 0:18:43.120
<v Speaker 1>the article how web Comics Work, and he was one

0:18:43.119 --> 0:18:45.520
<v Speaker 1>of my sources, and I did a full interview with him,

0:18:45.880 --> 0:18:48.560
<v Speaker 1>chatted with him for about probably an hour while I

0:18:48.600 --> 0:18:52.880
<v Speaker 1>was researching this work. And uh, it's so interesting because

0:18:52.960 --> 0:18:56.119
<v Speaker 1>again I had no idea until we started researching this

0:18:56.200 --> 0:19:00.280
<v Speaker 1>episode that he had contributed this piece of internet lore.

0:19:00.600 --> 0:19:04.960
<v Speaker 1>So the original work is presented as a series of posts,

0:19:05.080 --> 0:19:08.639
<v Speaker 1>again on a message board, so it seemingly a lot

0:19:08.680 --> 0:19:11.440
<v Speaker 1>of contributors. Yes, but but it's it's the work of

0:19:11.520 --> 0:19:14.560
<v Speaker 1>fiction of one person, but presented in the way as

0:19:14.640 --> 0:19:19.080
<v Speaker 1>if it's a thread, a conversational thread between multiple people

0:19:19.119 --> 0:19:24.400
<v Speaker 1>who all remember this children's show that no one else

0:19:24.400 --> 0:19:29.920
<v Speaker 1>seems to realize existed. And it starts off pretty innocently, like, Hey,

0:19:29.960 --> 0:19:33.159
<v Speaker 1>does anyone else here happen to remember this show? I

0:19:33.160 --> 0:19:36.439
<v Speaker 1>remember watching it as a kid, but I don't. I

0:19:36.480 --> 0:19:39.199
<v Speaker 1>can't find anything about it, and so I'm wondering, like

0:19:39.400 --> 0:19:41.919
<v Speaker 1>I just imagine it, and other people say, oh no,

0:19:42.040 --> 0:19:43.879
<v Speaker 1>I remember that show too, and again this is all

0:19:43.920 --> 0:19:46.680
<v Speaker 1>part of the fiction. Yeah. I think like the big

0:19:46.720 --> 0:19:49.120
<v Speaker 1>twist is not only as the show super creepy, as

0:19:49.119 --> 0:19:52.159
<v Speaker 1>people remember more and more about it, it starts to

0:19:52.200 --> 0:19:56.240
<v Speaker 1>appear more and more sinister. But one of the details

0:19:56.320 --> 0:20:00.960
<v Speaker 1>released is that, uh, the person who star the thread

0:20:01.200 --> 0:20:04.480
<v Speaker 1>chatted with his mother about what had happened, and his

0:20:04.560 --> 0:20:07.040
<v Speaker 1>mother said, oh, you would always say that you went

0:20:07.160 --> 0:20:09.480
<v Speaker 1>to want to watch a show called candle Cove, but

0:20:09.560 --> 0:20:12.440
<v Speaker 1>you just changed the channel to static and sat there

0:20:12.480 --> 0:20:16.399
<v Speaker 1>and stared at it for thirty minutes. Yeah. So again,

0:20:16.520 --> 0:20:19.480
<v Speaker 1>very very kind of creepy premise. But that has taken

0:20:19.480 --> 0:20:22.520
<v Speaker 1>a life of its own, where not only is it

0:20:22.560 --> 0:20:25.800
<v Speaker 1>a television series on sci fi where they take elements

0:20:25.800 --> 0:20:29.439
<v Speaker 1>of that and they wrap other narrative around it, um,

0:20:29.480 --> 0:20:32.199
<v Speaker 1>but on top of that, like I even debate on

0:20:32.320 --> 0:20:34.840
<v Speaker 1>using on including this because I thought, well, clearly this

0:20:34.920 --> 0:20:37.879
<v Speaker 1>is the work of fiction. People know it's work of fiction. No,

0:20:38.080 --> 0:20:41.080
<v Speaker 1>there are YouTube interviews are in YouTube videos I should

0:20:41.080 --> 0:20:44.880
<v Speaker 1>say titled is was Candle Cove a real TV show?

0:20:44.920 --> 0:20:46.600
<v Speaker 1>And I thought, well, if you have to make a

0:20:46.720 --> 0:20:50.120
<v Speaker 1>video about it, then there are people wondering about it. Yeah,

0:20:50.119 --> 0:20:55.440
<v Speaker 1>because there's there's videos of like original Candle Cove episodes

0:20:55.480 --> 0:20:58.280
<v Speaker 1>which I'm pretty sure are just lifted from the show

0:20:58.680 --> 0:21:02.760
<v Speaker 1>or base or there might be some like fan made

0:21:02.800 --> 0:21:06.400
<v Speaker 1>things because there were fan fictions written about candle Cove. Yeah,

0:21:06.560 --> 0:21:08.160
<v Speaker 1>now a lot of these actually would get a lot

0:21:08.160 --> 0:21:11.359
<v Speaker 1>of fan fiction added to it. And Uh, the other

0:21:11.400 --> 0:21:13.959
<v Speaker 1>thing that this reminds me of is something called the

0:21:14.000 --> 0:21:19.199
<v Speaker 1>Mandola effect. Um. Actually that's technically the Mandela effect, but

0:21:19.400 --> 0:21:21.480
<v Speaker 1>I've heard it pronounced the wrong way. But it's named

0:21:21.520 --> 0:21:24.040
<v Speaker 1>after Nelson Mandela. So have you heard of this effect.

0:21:24.080 --> 0:21:26.240
<v Speaker 1>I've heard of the effect. I don't actually know why.

0:21:26.240 --> 0:21:31.600
<v Speaker 1>It's called the Mandela effect. So Nelson Mandela was imprisoned

0:21:31.840 --> 0:21:35.879
<v Speaker 1>for many, many years, and the Mandela effect refers to

0:21:36.040 --> 0:21:40.320
<v Speaker 1>this belief that people had that they had heard newscasters

0:21:40.359 --> 0:21:43.960
<v Speaker 1>in the nineteen eighties announced that Nelson Mandela had passed

0:21:44.000 --> 0:21:48.639
<v Speaker 1>away while in prison, but that never happened. But people

0:21:48.720 --> 0:21:53.400
<v Speaker 1>swear they remember seeing those newscasts, but it never happened.

0:21:53.760 --> 0:21:56.280
<v Speaker 1>There are other examples of this. Uh. The two that

0:21:56.320 --> 0:22:00.359
<v Speaker 1>people tend to site pretty frequently are the Bernstein Bears,

0:22:00.760 --> 0:22:03.879
<v Speaker 1>where it's it's spelled stain at the end. That's the

0:22:03.920 --> 0:22:07.040
<v Speaker 1>correct spelling, but everyone thinks it's steen s T E

0:22:07.119 --> 0:22:10.119
<v Speaker 1>I n instead of s T A I n um,

0:22:10.160 --> 0:22:12.119
<v Speaker 1>and they swear like no I have a book and

0:22:12.160 --> 0:22:15.000
<v Speaker 1>it's spelled the other way. It's the barn steam Bears,

0:22:15.080 --> 0:22:18.160
<v Speaker 1>the barn Stain Bears, and the other one is Uh.

0:22:18.280 --> 0:22:21.399
<v Speaker 1>Everyone's convinced that the comedian Sindbad was in a movie

0:22:21.400 --> 0:22:24.520
<v Speaker 1>in which he played a genie named Shazam. Apparently he

0:22:24.720 --> 0:22:28.360
<v Speaker 1>was in like a weird promo where he was a genie,

0:22:28.840 --> 0:22:31.919
<v Speaker 1>but it wasn't there. There was no movie because there

0:22:31.960 --> 0:22:36.760
<v Speaker 1>was no Yeah, but those are all like Internet legends

0:22:36.840 --> 0:22:41.160
<v Speaker 1>that ended up sort of get growing, and this man

0:22:41.600 --> 0:22:47.320
<v Speaker 1>Mandela effect or Mandela effect had this added benefit of

0:22:47.600 --> 0:22:52.200
<v Speaker 1>people hearing something and then convincing themselves that they too

0:22:52.240 --> 0:22:56.439
<v Speaker 1>had experienced it, which is kind of interesting. Now we

0:22:56.520 --> 0:22:59.480
<v Speaker 1>actually have tons more we could talk about, like their

0:22:59.520 --> 0:23:02.520
<v Speaker 1>other LM monts, not just creepy pasta. There's stuff like

0:23:02.560 --> 0:23:06.960
<v Speaker 1>inspirational stories that are referred to as glurge, where I've

0:23:07.000 --> 0:23:09.160
<v Speaker 1>never heard refer to it as that it's you had

0:23:09.200 --> 0:23:11.200
<v Speaker 1>to be on snopes dot com back in the day

0:23:11.240 --> 0:23:14.520
<v Speaker 1>on those message boards, but glurge refers to stories that

0:23:15.280 --> 0:23:19.080
<v Speaker 1>are meant to tap into those sort of sappy emotions

0:23:19.119 --> 0:23:21.600
<v Speaker 1>that we have. Uh. They also tend to be kind

0:23:21.640 --> 0:23:26.920
<v Speaker 1>of dark under the surface, but it's it's the inspirational

0:23:27.000 --> 0:23:31.280
<v Speaker 1>story counterpart to creepy pasta, except it's often passed as

0:23:31.440 --> 0:23:35.480
<v Speaker 1>it really happened, and it turns out it's never anything verifiable.

0:23:35.880 --> 0:23:38.880
<v Speaker 1>But rather than go on all arounte about that, we're

0:23:38.880 --> 0:23:40.480
<v Speaker 1>gonna take a quick break and when we come back,

0:23:40.480 --> 0:23:51.959
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna talk about some conspiracy theories. Now, we started

0:23:52.000 --> 0:23:55.800
<v Speaker 1>off this episode talking about works of fiction that aren't

0:23:55.800 --> 0:24:00.600
<v Speaker 1>necessarily intended to be taken seriously, but sometimes take a

0:24:00.640 --> 0:24:02.960
<v Speaker 1>life of their own outside of their point of origin,

0:24:03.400 --> 0:24:06.040
<v Speaker 1>and then they are taken seriously. There are other times

0:24:06.400 --> 0:24:10.720
<v Speaker 1>where there's just a joke or a hoax that people

0:24:10.840 --> 0:24:15.320
<v Speaker 1>end up taking as a sincere message. And the first

0:24:15.359 --> 0:24:17.520
<v Speaker 1>one I wanted to mention is is one of the

0:24:17.560 --> 0:24:21.520
<v Speaker 1>earliest examples of an Internet hoax. It actually dates to December,

0:24:23.119 --> 0:24:25.959
<v Speaker 1>when very few people even knew what the Internet was,

0:24:26.720 --> 0:24:33.120
<v Speaker 1>and it all involves the company Microsoft supposedly acquiring the

0:24:33.200 --> 0:24:39.800
<v Speaker 1>Catholic Church. Huh, you're a Catholic, so so do you

0:24:39.840 --> 0:24:42.240
<v Speaker 1>own shares in Microsoft? Is that how it works? I

0:24:42.359 --> 0:24:45.760
<v Speaker 1>mean I have a Mac, so I don't. I don't

0:24:45.800 --> 0:24:49.400
<v Speaker 1>know that's true. It's right in front of it. Yeah,

0:24:49.480 --> 0:24:53.680
<v Speaker 1>I if if my mom's secretly owned shares and Microsoft,

0:24:53.840 --> 0:24:57.639
<v Speaker 1>then you know she's got some splain in too, do Yeah.

0:24:58.240 --> 0:25:01.360
<v Speaker 1>So had you heard of this before? I actually never

0:25:01.440 --> 0:25:04.479
<v Speaker 1>have maybe, And I went to Catholic school for so

0:25:04.520 --> 0:25:07.040
<v Speaker 1>many years in my life, I'm surprised I never heard

0:25:07.119 --> 0:25:12.159
<v Speaker 1>this four. How old were you in ninety four? I

0:25:12.359 --> 0:25:15.960
<v Speaker 1>was two, okay, maybe that's why you didn't hear about it, okay,

0:25:16.280 --> 0:25:20.960
<v Speaker 1>whereas I was older than that. So this was a joke,

0:25:21.400 --> 0:25:24.160
<v Speaker 1>and it was clearly a joke. It was a press release,

0:25:24.640 --> 0:25:26.840
<v Speaker 1>supposed press release, but it was, you know, a joke

0:25:26.920 --> 0:25:29.720
<v Speaker 1>in the form of a press release supposedly from the

0:25:29.760 --> 0:25:34.160
<v Speaker 1>Associated Press, which is you know, it's a legitimate organization. Uh.

0:25:34.320 --> 0:25:39.760
<v Speaker 1>It even had a byline by Hank Vorhez was supposedly

0:25:39.800 --> 0:25:42.800
<v Speaker 1>the name of the person who who wrote up this

0:25:42.840 --> 0:25:47.800
<v Speaker 1>press release in your relation to Jason, not Vorhees. Uh so,

0:25:48.359 --> 0:25:50.439
<v Speaker 1>uh yeah. And I even wrote, just imagine what Clippy

0:25:50.480 --> 0:25:53.359
<v Speaker 1>would be like. So you're trying to transubstantiate, would you

0:25:53.400 --> 0:25:57.960
<v Speaker 1>like some help? Um? So? Yeah. The the hoax, the

0:25:58.000 --> 0:26:01.000
<v Speaker 1>press release hoax even included a host in quote from

0:26:01.000 --> 0:26:05.040
<v Speaker 1>Bill Gates, who was referring to religion as a growth market.

0:26:05.720 --> 0:26:09.600
<v Speaker 1>Obviously that was part of the joke. And I said

0:26:09.640 --> 0:26:14.000
<v Speaker 1>that Microsoft would get exclusive electronic publication rights to the Bible,

0:26:14.320 --> 0:26:16.720
<v Speaker 1>so they would be able to only one version of it,

0:26:16.920 --> 0:26:19.240
<v Speaker 1>not the King James, and that would be the yeah,

0:26:19.359 --> 0:26:22.200
<v Speaker 1>be it would be whatever is the most Catholic version. Yeah,

0:26:23.440 --> 0:26:26.439
<v Speaker 1>the longer version, the Catholic version of anything. Is the

0:26:26.480 --> 0:26:28.600
<v Speaker 1>longer version ever been to a Catholic wedding. Yes, I

0:26:28.640 --> 0:26:31.600
<v Speaker 1>had still going on. I know I had to sneak out.

0:26:32.040 --> 0:26:35.800
<v Speaker 1>That was seven years ago. But yeah, this, like I said,

0:26:35.840 --> 0:26:38.440
<v Speaker 1>it was pretty clear it was a joke. And yet

0:26:39.960 --> 0:26:43.119
<v Speaker 1>there are people who either they got mad because they

0:26:43.119 --> 0:26:46.600
<v Speaker 1>thought that Microsoft had been perpetuating this joke and they

0:26:46.680 --> 0:26:50.159
<v Speaker 1>said this is in poor taste and Microsoft got flooded

0:26:50.640 --> 0:26:54.800
<v Speaker 1>with complaints, or there were a few people who thought

0:26:54.880 --> 0:26:57.800
<v Speaker 1>it was a genuine press release and they were horrified

0:26:57.840 --> 0:27:00.520
<v Speaker 1>about it, and they were reaching out the Microsoft express

0:27:00.600 --> 0:27:05.240
<v Speaker 1>their horror and concern. It got so bad that Microsoft

0:27:05.359 --> 0:27:12.720
<v Speaker 1>actually formally denounced the joke on December six, released its

0:27:12.760 --> 0:27:16.720
<v Speaker 1>own press release to say, no, we had nothing to

0:27:16.760 --> 0:27:19.560
<v Speaker 1>do with this announcement. We definitely did not buy the

0:27:19.600 --> 0:27:24.040
<v Speaker 1>Catholic Church. We know, we don't know who it was

0:27:24.160 --> 0:27:27.080
<v Speaker 1>that created this, We have no connection to it. We

0:27:27.160 --> 0:27:30.760
<v Speaker 1>are sorry that you're upset, which was weird that they

0:27:30.760 --> 0:27:33.760
<v Speaker 1>were apologizing for something that they literally had no control over.

0:27:34.800 --> 0:27:36.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean, this wouldn't be the only time that Microsoft

0:27:36.640 --> 0:27:40.520
<v Speaker 1>would get connected to Internet legends and hoaxes. There's there

0:27:40.520 --> 0:27:43.160
<v Speaker 1>were also ones that said if you forward this email,

0:27:43.440 --> 0:27:47.000
<v Speaker 1>then Bill Gates is going to give you like dollars,

0:27:47.040 --> 0:27:49.919
<v Speaker 1>which was never true. Oh those chain letters, I remember

0:27:49.920 --> 0:27:53.720
<v Speaker 1>those email chain letters quite well. Yeah, thankfully those have

0:27:53.920 --> 0:27:57.320
<v Speaker 1>kind of died down. But you sometimes will see the

0:27:57.359 --> 0:28:00.520
<v Speaker 1>equivalent on Facebook where it will be like usually Facebook,

0:28:00.520 --> 0:28:03.920
<v Speaker 1>it's share this, but don't share it copy and pasted.

0:28:04.480 --> 0:28:08.080
<v Speaker 1>And by the way, cut that message. Don't share this

0:28:08.240 --> 0:28:11.720
<v Speaker 1>copy and pasted. That's pretty much a dead giveaway that

0:28:11.840 --> 0:28:14.159
<v Speaker 1>what what you're being asked to do is to perpetuate

0:28:14.160 --> 0:28:18.560
<v Speaker 1>a hoax, because the justification usually get is we don't

0:28:18.560 --> 0:28:22.359
<v Speaker 1>want the people who are most vulnerable to be targeted,

0:28:22.600 --> 0:28:26.800
<v Speaker 1>so therefore, copy and paste it or Facebook's algorithms will

0:28:27.080 --> 0:28:30.359
<v Speaker 1>not promote this if you share it. That's not true.

0:28:30.760 --> 0:28:32.800
<v Speaker 1>The reason they don't want you to share it is

0:28:32.840 --> 0:28:36.080
<v Speaker 1>because if you share it rather than copy and pasted Yeah,

0:28:36.200 --> 0:28:37.920
<v Speaker 1>you can trace it back to the point of origin.

0:28:38.760 --> 0:28:42.360
<v Speaker 1>So sounds but the Microsoft Catholic Church stuff sounds a

0:28:42.360 --> 0:28:46.160
<v Speaker 1>little Jonathan swift E. Yeah, it was a it was

0:28:46.720 --> 0:28:52.400
<v Speaker 1>a pretty odd thing to see become, you know, a

0:28:52.400 --> 0:28:54.800
<v Speaker 1>hoax level. Again, I don't think it was intended as

0:28:54.840 --> 0:28:57.719
<v Speaker 1>a hoax. Like to me, this sounds like an onion

0:28:57.880 --> 0:29:03.000
<v Speaker 1>article and someone mistaken believing that a satirical article is

0:29:03.200 --> 0:29:07.360
<v Speaker 1>a real thing, like a modest proposal type of stuff. Yeah,

0:29:07.480 --> 0:29:10.320
<v Speaker 1>And when you when you see people taking something that

0:29:10.440 --> 0:29:16.160
<v Speaker 1>was meant as satire, sincerely, that's not scary. It is scary,

0:29:16.200 --> 0:29:18.920
<v Speaker 1>although sometimes it's you could also argue some people are

0:29:18.920 --> 0:29:22.640
<v Speaker 1>just really bad at satire, and sometimes things that people

0:29:22.720 --> 0:29:26.440
<v Speaker 1>claim our satire just are lies. S satirical, it's just

0:29:26.480 --> 0:29:30.480
<v Speaker 1>a lie. And uh, you know, perpetuating a lie and

0:29:30.520 --> 0:29:33.400
<v Speaker 1>then telling people, oh no it's satire. That's not to

0:29:33.440 --> 0:29:36.160
<v Speaker 1>get out of jail free card. My joke didn't land.

0:29:36.160 --> 0:29:38.720
<v Speaker 1>Oh don't worry, it was just satire. Yeah, no, it wasn't.

0:29:38.760 --> 0:29:41.640
<v Speaker 1>It was a bad joke, right right, or or there's no,

0:29:41.720 --> 0:29:45.360
<v Speaker 1>there was no joke structure there. You were just telling falsehoods.

0:29:45.760 --> 0:29:47.680
<v Speaker 1>Then you got mad when you got called out on it.

0:29:48.640 --> 0:29:51.280
<v Speaker 1>So that is a very early example. And then the

0:29:51.320 --> 0:29:55.720
<v Speaker 1>next one is sort of the genesis for this whole episode,

0:29:55.840 --> 0:30:00.360
<v Speaker 1>the eratus story E R R A t A S.

0:30:00.600 --> 0:30:03.520
<v Speaker 1>Although sometimes it's just with one R R A T

0:30:03.760 --> 0:30:05.959
<v Speaker 1>A S. I'm glad that you've established that we were

0:30:05.960 --> 0:30:10.120
<v Speaker 1>saying erratas not not not erotic, or I was saying

0:30:10.200 --> 0:30:15.840
<v Speaker 1>like aratus. Well, it's a rata. Errata is already plural,

0:30:16.000 --> 0:30:18.680
<v Speaker 1>so it's already it's already got a problem with it. Yeah,

0:30:18.760 --> 0:30:23.120
<v Speaker 1>because it's it's pluralized, uh in an Anglican way. But

0:30:23.400 --> 0:30:26.960
<v Speaker 1>arrata would already be the plural and it means like errors. Right.

0:30:27.240 --> 0:30:30.040
<v Speaker 1>You typically would say, like you would publish a rata

0:30:30.160 --> 0:30:33.640
<v Speaker 1>to say these are things that we're included in the

0:30:33.640 --> 0:30:38.320
<v Speaker 1>previous published work which there are wrong. Yeah, might be

0:30:38.360 --> 0:30:41.560
<v Speaker 1>a typo, might be that there was a misplaced decimal

0:30:41.640 --> 0:30:45.120
<v Speaker 1>and a figure or something. So the misspelling of erratas

0:30:45.280 --> 0:30:49.280
<v Speaker 1>is in itself of errata to be in a ratum, right,

0:30:49.320 --> 0:30:55.440
<v Speaker 1>it wouldn't be. It's errataception. Okay, So this is a

0:30:55.480 --> 0:30:58.680
<v Speaker 1>weird one. It's a very odd story. It's actually kind

0:30:58.680 --> 0:31:02.840
<v Speaker 1>of hard to explain because it gets wrapped up in

0:31:02.920 --> 0:31:08.360
<v Speaker 1>about two or three different kind of weird things. Uh. Supposedly,

0:31:08.600 --> 0:31:14.000
<v Speaker 1>aratus itself refers to some kind of computer algorithm. Yeah,

0:31:14.160 --> 0:31:18.720
<v Speaker 1>that's used by HR or used by companies to remove

0:31:19.040 --> 0:31:23.160
<v Speaker 1>material they don't want on the Internet. Like think of

0:31:23.240 --> 0:31:27.680
<v Speaker 1>it as it's supposedly an algorithm that can seek and

0:31:27.760 --> 0:31:33.320
<v Speaker 1>destroy content and remove it from the Internet automatically. Typically

0:31:34.280 --> 0:31:38.280
<v Speaker 1>described as a way of removing stuff that's infringing on copyright,

0:31:38.400 --> 0:31:43.280
<v Speaker 1>so like a takedown. So let's say that you, I

0:31:43.320 --> 0:31:47.480
<v Speaker 1>don't know, you upload the entire film Berry Gordy's the

0:31:47.560 --> 0:31:51.280
<v Speaker 1>Last Dragon to YouTube, and you just haven't hosted on

0:31:51.320 --> 0:31:54.840
<v Speaker 1>your own account because it's the greatest movie ever made,

0:31:54.880 --> 0:31:56.720
<v Speaker 1>and I will brook no discussion upon the matter, and

0:31:56.760 --> 0:32:03.200
<v Speaker 1>then this ratus computer algorithm would could be could be

0:32:03.240 --> 0:32:05.840
<v Speaker 1>sent to take that down. There's no need for that.

0:32:06.000 --> 0:32:10.480
<v Speaker 1>YouTube has a very effective, some would say over effective

0:32:11.080 --> 0:32:14.959
<v Speaker 1>means of taking down stuff that gets copyright strikes on it,

0:32:15.440 --> 0:32:18.160
<v Speaker 1>either demonetizing it or taking it down entirely, there's no

0:32:18.280 --> 0:32:21.040
<v Speaker 1>need for an algorithm. But the other component to this

0:32:21.600 --> 0:32:25.560
<v Speaker 1>is that supposedly the algorithm could find and remove references

0:32:25.600 --> 0:32:31.000
<v Speaker 1>to itself. Yeah, like if you what it's when I

0:32:31.040 --> 0:32:34.440
<v Speaker 1>was researching, it seemed like it was saying that if you,

0:32:35.240 --> 0:32:39.640
<v Speaker 1>if anybody even typed in erratas into like a search engine,

0:32:39.720 --> 0:32:44.120
<v Speaker 1>it could somehow not really damage your computer, but it

0:32:44.160 --> 0:32:47.200
<v Speaker 1>could like track you just by looking it up or

0:32:47.240 --> 0:32:50.160
<v Speaker 1>something like like Like a lot of stories went were

0:32:50.240 --> 0:32:54.320
<v Speaker 1>about how someone was supposedly working for a company and

0:32:54.480 --> 0:32:59.960
<v Speaker 1>came across some mention of eratus box labeled yeah, or

0:33:00.240 --> 0:33:03.520
<v Speaker 1>like a division that had the name Eratus, and then

0:33:03.560 --> 0:33:08.280
<v Speaker 1>they would do an internal search on their uh intra net,

0:33:08.600 --> 0:33:12.880
<v Speaker 1>right the company's intranet, not the Internet necessarily, and that

0:33:13.280 --> 0:33:18.200
<v Speaker 1>this would suddenly raise an alarm among the big wigs

0:33:18.240 --> 0:33:22.160
<v Speaker 1>and that person would be dismissed, fired from their job,

0:33:22.280 --> 0:33:25.840
<v Speaker 1>or they would be discouraged in no uncertain terms to

0:33:26.200 --> 0:33:28.680
<v Speaker 1>leave all that alone. And so it was just this

0:33:28.760 --> 0:33:32.760
<v Speaker 1>idea that it was a forbidden search term to the

0:33:32.800 --> 0:33:36.960
<v Speaker 1>point where people were perpetuating stories that you shouldn't even

0:33:37.120 --> 0:33:39.920
<v Speaker 1>search for it online because it could come back to

0:33:40.000 --> 0:33:46.080
<v Speaker 1>haunt you. Don't even think think. Meanwhile, seemingly not connected

0:33:46.120 --> 0:33:50.640
<v Speaker 1>to this at all, there was a YouTube account created

0:33:50.680 --> 0:33:56.480
<v Speaker 1>called Chronos for Life that appeared to be mostly dedicated

0:33:56.560 --> 0:34:01.920
<v Speaker 1>to a very odd video talking about the Jurassic Park film.

0:34:02.000 --> 0:34:04.880
<v Speaker 1>It was like a fan video of Jurassic Park. And

0:34:05.880 --> 0:34:08.520
<v Speaker 1>have you watched these videos? I didn't watch the video.

0:34:08.560 --> 0:34:11.920
<v Speaker 1>I watched clips of the like snippets of the videos themselves.

0:34:12.000 --> 0:34:14.560
<v Speaker 1>So a lot of the videos have like white text

0:34:14.760 --> 0:34:18.359
<v Speaker 1>on top of there's there's no that's illegible. Yeah, there's no,

0:34:18.520 --> 0:34:22.719
<v Speaker 1>there's no like voice over. It's like the narrator is

0:34:22.760 --> 0:34:26.680
<v Speaker 1>communicating via text, but it's white text over light background.

0:34:26.760 --> 0:34:29.000
<v Speaker 1>So it makes it. And sometimes it's only up for

0:34:29.600 --> 0:34:32.560
<v Speaker 1>a short number of frames, and it's and the video

0:34:32.600 --> 0:34:36.080
<v Speaker 1>itself along with the text is so poor quality no

0:34:36.120 --> 0:34:38.680
<v Speaker 1>matter how you watch it that it's hard to read,

0:34:38.719 --> 0:34:40.880
<v Speaker 1>no matter what. Right, So you get you get the

0:34:40.920 --> 0:34:44.640
<v Speaker 1>sense that the person who made this uh is either

0:34:44.920 --> 0:34:48.880
<v Speaker 1>doing some very interesting but strange performance art, or maybe

0:34:48.960 --> 0:34:53.680
<v Speaker 1>they're not. They're not. Well, that's another possibility, because it

0:34:53.719 --> 0:34:58.319
<v Speaker 1>comes across very disjointed, illogical, difficult to follow, things that

0:34:58.360 --> 0:35:02.800
<v Speaker 1>would typically be unsettling. Yeah, it was kind of conspiratorial,

0:35:02.880 --> 0:35:05.160
<v Speaker 1>but you didn't really know what the conspiracy was, right,

0:35:05.200 --> 0:35:08.239
<v Speaker 1>And then there would be a video that was in

0:35:08.280 --> 0:35:12.040
<v Speaker 1>that same vein, but not about Jurassic Park rather about

0:35:12.400 --> 0:35:18.479
<v Speaker 1>how uh this eratus thing was a dark conspiracy and

0:35:18.640 --> 0:35:21.600
<v Speaker 1>I think that it was even Uh the person was

0:35:21.640 --> 0:35:25.600
<v Speaker 1>worried about their mother being under surveillance. Yeah, because the

0:35:25.640 --> 0:35:28.239
<v Speaker 1>mom was the one originally uploading all the Jurassic Park

0:35:28.400 --> 0:35:32.640
<v Speaker 1>videos because or something. And then yeah, that that her

0:35:32.840 --> 0:35:37.520
<v Speaker 1>her own mental acuity was deteriorating as a result of this,

0:35:37.640 --> 0:35:41.839
<v Speaker 1>and yeah, I guess, very very strange. And then uh,

0:35:42.480 --> 0:35:46.160
<v Speaker 1>people found that if they turned on captions for these videos,

0:35:46.960 --> 0:35:48.880
<v Speaker 1>because you couldn't really make anything out in the videos,

0:35:48.880 --> 0:35:51.640
<v Speaker 1>but you turn on captions, you would get these captions

0:35:51.680 --> 0:35:56.480
<v Speaker 1>that would not appear otherwise. That left clues, and if

0:35:56.520 --> 0:36:00.640
<v Speaker 1>you followed the clues, you would eventually find your self

0:36:00.880 --> 0:36:04.360
<v Speaker 1>looking at the band camp page for a band called

0:36:04.600 --> 0:36:08.440
<v Speaker 1>KFC Murder Chicks. Are we going to get sued? No,

0:36:10.239 --> 0:36:12.759
<v Speaker 1>but that's what the band was called. I'm yeah, are

0:36:12.800 --> 0:36:15.399
<v Speaker 1>they going to get sued? But probably not at this point.

0:36:15.400 --> 0:36:17.320
<v Speaker 1>It sounds to be like that band has been defunct

0:36:17.400 --> 0:36:23.200
<v Speaker 1>for a long time. So what this eventually appeared to

0:36:23.280 --> 0:36:29.279
<v Speaker 1>be was a case of a person working on a

0:36:29.400 --> 0:36:33.279
<v Speaker 1>music project which largely was based around taking snippets of

0:36:33.320 --> 0:36:37.040
<v Speaker 1>audio from videos and putting it together into really weird

0:36:37.680 --> 0:36:41.520
<v Speaker 1>uh composition. Yeah. The purpose of the band was to

0:36:41.640 --> 0:36:46.160
<v Speaker 1>create a type of music called Internet sounds. Yeah deep Internet, Yeah,

0:36:46.239 --> 0:36:48.600
<v Speaker 1>the deep Internet Sounds, and it was supposed to be

0:36:48.719 --> 0:36:53.319
<v Speaker 1>some sort of weird, distorted background noise. It made me

0:36:53.400 --> 0:36:59.440
<v Speaker 1>think of like a perhaps less focused approach to to

0:37:00.000 --> 0:37:03.520
<v Speaker 1>forrmants as a Negative Land does, and that's a band

0:37:03.560 --> 0:37:08.840
<v Speaker 1>that does a lot of compositions by taking pieces audio

0:37:08.920 --> 0:37:13.719
<v Speaker 1>snippets from different sources and putting them together into very

0:37:13.800 --> 0:37:19.680
<v Speaker 1>interesting uh audio like interesting albums. Actually, in fact, I

0:37:19.719 --> 0:37:22.919
<v Speaker 1>had UH, one of the founding members of Negative Land

0:37:23.080 --> 0:37:24.960
<v Speaker 1>on for a couple of episodes and we talked about

0:37:24.960 --> 0:37:28.480
<v Speaker 1>that work so similar to that, and in fact that

0:37:28.719 --> 0:37:34.160
<v Speaker 1>the person who had UH created these would later say, yeah,

0:37:34.200 --> 0:37:36.400
<v Speaker 1>this was just sort of my attempt to kind of

0:37:36.719 --> 0:37:42.800
<v Speaker 1>make something um, but I didn't really have a fully

0:37:42.840 --> 0:37:44.959
<v Speaker 1>fleshed out plan on how that was going to work.

0:37:46.239 --> 0:37:49.040
<v Speaker 1>But on the Internet people were following it and filling

0:37:49.040 --> 0:37:52.040
<v Speaker 1>in the gaps and making it more than what it

0:37:52.239 --> 0:37:55.759
<v Speaker 1>was and treating it like, oh, there really is this

0:37:55.880 --> 0:37:58.920
<v Speaker 1>conspiracy out there. And one of the crazy things about

0:37:58.920 --> 0:38:03.359
<v Speaker 1>conspiracy theory is that if you come out and tell

0:38:03.440 --> 0:38:07.080
<v Speaker 1>someone no, that was all manufactured, it's not actually a

0:38:07.120 --> 0:38:11.960
<v Speaker 1>conspiracy that ends up being parcy. Yeah, it's a cover up, right, Like,

0:38:12.080 --> 0:38:15.160
<v Speaker 1>so there's no way to disprove a conspiracy to someone

0:38:15.160 --> 0:38:20.840
<v Speaker 1>who's desperately going to follow that conspiracy theory. They they

0:38:20.880 --> 0:38:23.920
<v Speaker 1>they are invested in believing in it, and so any

0:38:24.320 --> 0:38:29.760
<v Speaker 1>counter evidence you give was manufactured to discredit the conspiracy,

0:38:29.800 --> 0:38:33.160
<v Speaker 1>but it doesn't disprove it. That kind of thing. So

0:38:33.480 --> 0:38:35.719
<v Speaker 1>this is another one of those cases where again I

0:38:35.719 --> 0:38:37.840
<v Speaker 1>I had never even heard of this until you asked

0:38:37.840 --> 0:38:40.319
<v Speaker 1>me about it. I honestly, at the beginning of this week,

0:38:40.360 --> 0:38:45.040
<v Speaker 1>I was just very sick and going through just the interwebs,

0:38:45.080 --> 0:38:49.399
<v Speaker 1>and I came across the video about eratas conspiracy, and

0:38:49.440 --> 0:38:52.359
<v Speaker 1>I was like, that sounds like something he has talked

0:38:52.360 --> 0:38:54.279
<v Speaker 1>about at some point. I don't know. There are so

0:38:54.320 --> 0:38:57.560
<v Speaker 1>many episodes that I'm not sure. I mean, it may

0:38:57.640 --> 0:39:00.000
<v Speaker 1>turn out that there that I have covered this very

0:39:00.360 --> 0:39:03.120
<v Speaker 1>same story. Yeah, and I wouldn't remember this was all

0:39:03.120 --> 0:39:06.480
<v Speaker 1>a conspiracy in and of itself. Well, I think it's

0:39:06.480 --> 0:39:08.520
<v Speaker 1>fascinating and we have a little bit more to talk

0:39:08.560 --> 0:39:13.560
<v Speaker 1>about as far as misinformation goes, where Like in this case,

0:39:13.600 --> 0:39:16.960
<v Speaker 1>I would say that the eradas thing kind of falls

0:39:16.960 --> 0:39:20.640
<v Speaker 1>into the land of the alternate reality game genre. So

0:39:20.719 --> 0:39:26.520
<v Speaker 1>alternate reality games are where you mix reality and the

0:39:26.640 --> 0:39:31.040
<v Speaker 1>fictional world within a game, and um, there are a

0:39:31.080 --> 0:39:37.080
<v Speaker 1>lot of examples. They typically are marketing tools. So for example, AI,

0:39:37.239 --> 0:39:41.760
<v Speaker 1>the movie AI, the Spielberg Kubrick film AI had an

0:39:41.800 --> 0:39:44.279
<v Speaker 1>alternate reality game associated with it that a lot of

0:39:44.320 --> 0:39:48.120
<v Speaker 1>people referred to as The Beast, and it was a

0:39:48.160 --> 0:39:52.080
<v Speaker 1>story that played out mostly online, but included some stuff

0:39:52.120 --> 0:39:55.040
<v Speaker 1>where people could interact not just online, but they could

0:39:55.080 --> 0:39:57.719
<v Speaker 1>get faxes and phone calls and stuff. So it was

0:39:57.800 --> 0:40:02.200
<v Speaker 1>like the fictional world of the game would reach across

0:40:02.440 --> 0:40:06.880
<v Speaker 1>the barrier between reality and fiction and interact with you

0:40:06.960 --> 0:40:10.960
<v Speaker 1>in ways in the real world that typically games don't.

0:40:11.680 --> 0:40:15.760
<v Speaker 1>So it became kind of a role playing game almost, um.

0:40:15.840 --> 0:40:19.680
<v Speaker 1>And I think that that's one version that can end

0:40:19.760 --> 0:40:24.120
<v Speaker 1>up being misconstrued as being reality as opposed to now

0:40:24.160 --> 0:40:26.160
<v Speaker 1>this is a marketing thing, or it's it's meant to

0:40:26.200 --> 0:40:28.719
<v Speaker 1>be a game. When we come back, we're gonna talk

0:40:28.760 --> 0:40:35.400
<v Speaker 1>about examples of misinformation that we're created specifically to perpetuate

0:40:35.640 --> 0:40:39.840
<v Speaker 1>an agenda, not to create some sort of fiction or

0:40:39.880 --> 0:40:42.480
<v Speaker 1>a game. We'll do that after we come back from

0:40:42.520 --> 0:40:53.000
<v Speaker 1>this quick break. All right, we're getting into the home stretch,

0:40:53.000 --> 0:40:55.160
<v Speaker 1>and this is some of the darkest stuff we have

0:40:55.239 --> 0:41:00.239
<v Speaker 1>to talk about. So there are communities out on the

0:41:00.239 --> 0:41:04.399
<v Speaker 1>Internet that so discord and they may do it for

0:41:04.520 --> 0:41:08.120
<v Speaker 1>multiple reasons. They might just want to you know, it

0:41:08.160 --> 0:41:12.000
<v Speaker 1>might be like what Christopher Nolan would say, some people

0:41:12.080 --> 0:41:15.560
<v Speaker 1>just want to watch the world burn. Um. In some cases,

0:41:15.640 --> 0:41:21.319
<v Speaker 1>it's to push a particular agenda that they really believe in,

0:41:21.520 --> 0:41:25.080
<v Speaker 1>or to discredit an agenda that they do not like.

0:41:25.800 --> 0:41:30.759
<v Speaker 1>And um, and all's fair in these communities, and in fact,

0:41:30.840 --> 0:41:34.760
<v Speaker 1>you have multiple people with different motivators, all working towards

0:41:34.760 --> 0:41:38.240
<v Speaker 1>the same goal. Some people may earnestly want to bring

0:41:38.360 --> 0:41:41.840
<v Speaker 1>down something. Some people may just think it's funny to

0:41:42.680 --> 0:41:46.000
<v Speaker 1>see commotion come out of their work, you know. Some

0:41:46.000 --> 0:41:49.520
<v Speaker 1>people just want to get a rise out of people. Um.

0:41:49.560 --> 0:41:52.279
<v Speaker 1>But the communities that we typically see this in the

0:41:52.320 --> 0:41:56.239
<v Speaker 1>most are places like four chan and eight chan, where

0:41:56.280 --> 0:42:01.200
<v Speaker 1>we get groups of people who find each other, they

0:42:01.200 --> 0:42:06.640
<v Speaker 1>have some sort of commonality between them, and they know

0:42:06.760 --> 0:42:10.319
<v Speaker 1>how to gamify systems. They know how people think, and

0:42:10.320 --> 0:42:14.200
<v Speaker 1>they know how systems work, and using those two things together,

0:42:14.640 --> 0:42:20.879
<v Speaker 1>they can perpetuate misinformation and lies and push forward their

0:42:20.880 --> 0:42:24.120
<v Speaker 1>own agenda. And we've seen that several times over the

0:42:24.200 --> 0:42:28.719
<v Speaker 1>last few years. In particular, so one entity or one

0:42:28.800 --> 0:42:32.759
<v Speaker 1>group would be q and on. Really that's originally an

0:42:32.880 --> 0:42:37.000
<v Speaker 1>entity UH, a person who was posting with the handle

0:42:37.640 --> 0:42:43.560
<v Speaker 1>q um so q and on being anonymous that has

0:42:43.640 --> 0:42:52.560
<v Speaker 1>posted numerous things that were very conspiracy oriented directed at

0:42:53.360 --> 0:42:59.280
<v Speaker 1>particular groups or people, for example Hillary Clinton UM and

0:43:00.080 --> 0:43:02.440
<v Speaker 1>it ends up being something a narrative that ends up

0:43:02.480 --> 0:43:05.680
<v Speaker 1>being picked up by other people and then presented as

0:43:05.760 --> 0:43:09.120
<v Speaker 1>truth that then gets reinforced again and again to the

0:43:09.120 --> 0:43:12.680
<v Speaker 1>point where you start seeing some of those things that

0:43:12.719 --> 0:43:18.080
<v Speaker 1>have never shown to have any actual truth to them

0:43:18.280 --> 0:43:24.680
<v Speaker 1>being presented by UH by media outlets as truth, usually

0:43:25.120 --> 0:43:28.000
<v Speaker 1>right wing media outlets. You don't tend to see that

0:43:28.880 --> 0:43:32.920
<v Speaker 1>beyond that group, but it has become a real issue.

0:43:33.800 --> 0:43:37.520
<v Speaker 1>And one example of that has been known as pizza Gate.

0:43:38.480 --> 0:43:41.680
<v Speaker 1>And pizza Gate is a pretty a truly terrible story

0:43:42.200 --> 0:43:45.680
<v Speaker 1>UH and it's it's one that alleges that there was

0:43:45.719 --> 0:43:51.600
<v Speaker 1>this particular pizza parlor where secretly there was a pedophilia

0:43:51.719 --> 0:43:55.799
<v Speaker 1>ring running through this this pizza parlor, Like that was

0:43:55.880 --> 0:44:00.879
<v Speaker 1>like the nexus for this pedophilia ring, uh, and that

0:44:01.160 --> 0:44:05.960
<v Speaker 1>this establishment also had a connection to the Clintons, And

0:44:07.120 --> 0:44:10.520
<v Speaker 1>there were a lot of different people posting on a

0:44:10.960 --> 0:44:14.560
<v Speaker 1>lot of different platforms that we're trying to substantiate these

0:44:14.600 --> 0:44:19.239
<v Speaker 1>claims that again under investigation, there was no evidence to

0:44:19.280 --> 0:44:22.560
<v Speaker 1>support any of it, but that wasn't what was important.

0:44:22.600 --> 0:44:28.080
<v Speaker 1>What was important was that ground swell of people making

0:44:28.120 --> 0:44:32.560
<v Speaker 1>these allegations and then immediately responding to any criticism by saying,

0:44:32.560 --> 0:44:36.080
<v Speaker 1>you're trying to cover this up and that is unacceptable.

0:44:36.080 --> 0:44:40.719
<v Speaker 1>Their children and they're they're welfare that's at stake and

0:44:40.840 --> 0:44:44.040
<v Speaker 1>how dare you? And I mean, that's a very powerful

0:44:44.480 --> 0:44:49.400
<v Speaker 1>emotional lever to pull. So it was really effective, at

0:44:49.480 --> 0:44:54.960
<v Speaker 1>least in certain circles. Yes. And also it's one of

0:44:55.000 --> 0:45:02.239
<v Speaker 1>those arguments where you are confirming so one's bias that's

0:45:02.280 --> 0:45:05.160
<v Speaker 1>directed towards a certain group. Right. So that's one of

0:45:05.160 --> 0:45:07.840
<v Speaker 1>the reasons why we really wanted to talk about this topic.

0:45:07.880 --> 0:45:10.360
<v Speaker 1>Two is the idea that why do these things get

0:45:10.560 --> 0:45:13.000
<v Speaker 1>spread so fast and why do they get adopted so quickly?

0:45:13.280 --> 0:45:16.480
<v Speaker 1>And it's a couple of different things. Uh. One of

0:45:16.520 --> 0:45:19.520
<v Speaker 1>the big things is just the way human behavior tends

0:45:19.560 --> 0:45:22.880
<v Speaker 1>to work. So say, if you come up to me

0:45:22.920 --> 0:45:25.640
<v Speaker 1>and you tell me something that that seems to confirm

0:45:25.680 --> 0:45:28.600
<v Speaker 1>a bias I already have, I am more inclined to

0:45:28.640 --> 0:45:32.880
<v Speaker 1>believe you right, because you seem to be telling me

0:45:33.000 --> 0:45:37.640
<v Speaker 1>something that that reinforces a belief I already possess. So

0:45:38.880 --> 0:45:43.680
<v Speaker 1>if I believe I have a sweet, sweet style despite

0:45:43.680 --> 0:45:46.960
<v Speaker 1>all evidence to the contrary, and you come up and

0:45:46.960 --> 0:45:50.600
<v Speaker 1>you say, Wow, you're really got that outfits really well

0:45:50.640 --> 0:45:54.880
<v Speaker 1>put together, you really are looking great today, I can

0:45:54.960 --> 0:45:57.120
<v Speaker 1>sit there and think like, oh, yeah, I knew I

0:45:57.200 --> 0:46:00.000
<v Speaker 1>have a sweet, sweet style, and sheha is just reinforce

0:46:00.200 --> 0:46:05.480
<v Speaker 1>that belief. So while any objective viewer might look at

0:46:05.480 --> 0:46:08.200
<v Speaker 1>me and think this guy doesn't even know how to

0:46:08.239 --> 0:46:11.680
<v Speaker 1>match his socks, I'm walking down the straight thinking I

0:46:11.719 --> 0:46:16.799
<v Speaker 1>got sweet sweet style. Yes, But in that case that

0:46:16.920 --> 0:46:20.160
<v Speaker 1>was that's harmless, right. But if I have, let's say

0:46:20.160 --> 0:46:24.120
<v Speaker 1>a different belief. Let's say that I believe that um

0:46:24.200 --> 0:46:28.040
<v Speaker 1>an organization like the Red Cross. Let's say I have

0:46:28.080 --> 0:46:30.440
<v Speaker 1>a belief that the Red Cross is actually doing something

0:46:30.440 --> 0:46:35.480
<v Speaker 1>really nefarious. And then you were to come to me

0:46:35.880 --> 0:46:42.239
<v Speaker 1>and say, I just heard that over in South Carolina

0:46:42.320 --> 0:46:45.680
<v Speaker 1>the Red Cross has quarantined this entire community, and they

0:46:45.719 --> 0:46:48.160
<v Speaker 1>won't tell anyone why. And it's like it doesn't even

0:46:48.200 --> 0:46:50.360
<v Speaker 1>have to make any sense, right, It doesn't have to

0:46:50.360 --> 0:46:52.000
<v Speaker 1>have It doesn't have to make any sense you have

0:46:52.040 --> 0:46:54.200
<v Speaker 1>to have you don't have to have any corroborating evidence.

0:46:54.920 --> 0:46:58.640
<v Speaker 1>If it plays into a belief I already have, I

0:46:58.680 --> 0:47:02.080
<v Speaker 1>am more inclined to believe you, So that's part of it.

0:47:02.400 --> 0:47:05.359
<v Speaker 1>If it plays on a fear I have, I'm more

0:47:05.360 --> 0:47:08.279
<v Speaker 1>inclined to believe you because if I'm already afraid of

0:47:08.320 --> 0:47:11.480
<v Speaker 1>something and you tell me there's that that fear is

0:47:12.680 --> 0:47:16.759
<v Speaker 1>is rational or is you know, legitimate because of some

0:47:16.840 --> 0:47:21.040
<v Speaker 1>other reason, I'm more inclined to believe you. On top

0:47:21.120 --> 0:47:25.960
<v Speaker 1>of that, we have these Internet communities and uh, in

0:47:26.000 --> 0:47:28.160
<v Speaker 1>some cases you might have something like a sub credit

0:47:28.480 --> 0:47:30.440
<v Speaker 1>where you have these people who share some sort of

0:47:30.480 --> 0:47:33.840
<v Speaker 1>common interest or common trait. They will reinforce their beliefs.

0:47:33.840 --> 0:47:37.120
<v Speaker 1>It becomes an echo chamber. But you also have platforms

0:47:37.160 --> 0:47:40.719
<v Speaker 1>like Facebook and Facebook. The way it works is that

0:47:40.800 --> 0:47:44.200
<v Speaker 1>when a post gets a lot of engagement, when people

0:47:44.239 --> 0:47:46.839
<v Speaker 1>are leaving comments, when people are sharing it, when people

0:47:46.880 --> 0:47:49.839
<v Speaker 1>are liking it. You know, when people are applying to

0:47:49.840 --> 0:47:55.439
<v Speaker 1>one another. Facebook sees that activity, and Facebook makes money

0:47:55.480 --> 0:47:58.879
<v Speaker 1>when people are spending time on Facebook. So if they

0:47:58.920 --> 0:48:01.719
<v Speaker 1>see if they being an algorithm, actually it's not even

0:48:01.719 --> 0:48:07.200
<v Speaker 1>a person. If the Facebook algorithm identifies certain posts as

0:48:07.239 --> 0:48:11.680
<v Speaker 1>being really productive from an engagement standpoint, those posts are

0:48:11.760 --> 0:48:15.880
<v Speaker 1>valuable because it means when people see this, they spend

0:48:15.960 --> 0:48:18.680
<v Speaker 1>more time on the platform. When they spend more time

0:48:18.680 --> 0:48:22.040
<v Speaker 1>on the platform, we make more money. So let's promote

0:48:22.760 --> 0:48:26.560
<v Speaker 1>the posts that are getting this kind of crazy engagement.

0:48:27.480 --> 0:48:32.520
<v Speaker 1>And so that's why you see posts that are not

0:48:32.560 --> 0:48:39.719
<v Speaker 1>necessarily sincere or earnest, or accurate or truthful get promoted

0:48:40.120 --> 0:48:41.960
<v Speaker 1>on sites like Facebook. In fact, that's one of the

0:48:42.040 --> 0:48:45.960
<v Speaker 1>big reasons why the United States government has called Facebook

0:48:46.000 --> 0:48:50.560
<v Speaker 1>to task on multiple occasions for perpetuating, you know, quote

0:48:50.640 --> 0:48:54.879
<v Speaker 1>unquote fake news, which I term I hate because it's

0:48:54.960 --> 0:49:00.640
<v Speaker 1>often used to discredit actual news while not being applied

0:49:00.680 --> 0:49:04.440
<v Speaker 1>to what is truly fake news. But that's neither here

0:49:04.480 --> 0:49:11.799
<v Speaker 1>nor there. So it's a tricky situation because as a

0:49:11.800 --> 0:49:16.240
<v Speaker 1>as a human being, it's asking what what I'm asking

0:49:16.280 --> 0:49:19.360
<v Speaker 1>you to do is to engage your critical thinking skills

0:49:19.880 --> 0:49:25.719
<v Speaker 1>even when you're encountering something that seems to be confirming

0:49:25.760 --> 0:49:28.560
<v Speaker 1>your beliefs, like you have to. You have to apply

0:49:28.640 --> 0:49:32.360
<v Speaker 1>critical thinking even in those cases, especially in those cases,

0:49:32.680 --> 0:49:36.560
<v Speaker 1>because that's when your most vulnerable to accepting a lie

0:49:36.600 --> 0:49:39.400
<v Speaker 1>as the truth, When it is telling you something that

0:49:39.480 --> 0:49:42.520
<v Speaker 1>you want to hear, or it's reaffirming something you were

0:49:42.600 --> 0:49:46.320
<v Speaker 1>afraid of. That's when you have to apply those critical

0:49:46.360 --> 0:49:52.080
<v Speaker 1>thinking skills the most. Because the people who are perpetuating

0:49:52.120 --> 0:49:55.960
<v Speaker 1>this stuff, they already they're aware, at least on a

0:49:56.000 --> 0:49:59.399
<v Speaker 1>certain level of human psychology and how these things work

0:49:59.520 --> 0:50:02.160
<v Speaker 1>and how messages can be delivered in a way that

0:50:02.280 --> 0:50:05.839
<v Speaker 1>will get the broadest acceptance. So you have to keep

0:50:05.840 --> 0:50:09.840
<v Speaker 1>that in mind, like they're gamifying the system, and the

0:50:09.840 --> 0:50:11.880
<v Speaker 1>system happens to be the way people think and the

0:50:11.920 --> 0:50:17.960
<v Speaker 1>way these communities operate. To quote my favorite musical ever

0:50:18.719 --> 0:50:21.960
<v Speaker 1>created um ref Madness the Musical. Okay, I just think

0:50:21.960 --> 0:50:24.000
<v Speaker 1>it was gonna be repo the Genetic Opera, But go ahead,

0:50:24.040 --> 0:50:26.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I guess we could find a connection there

0:50:26.200 --> 0:50:30.400
<v Speaker 1>as well. But refermat the very last line and refor

0:50:30.440 --> 0:50:33.759
<v Speaker 1>Madness the Musical is when danger's near, exploit their fear.

0:50:33.880 --> 0:50:36.719
<v Speaker 1>The end will justify the means. Yeah, so this is

0:50:36.760 --> 0:50:39.880
<v Speaker 1>not this is not a new idea. I mean, propaganda

0:50:40.040 --> 0:50:43.640
<v Speaker 1>is largely based on this same principle. In fact, you know,

0:50:43.719 --> 0:50:45.279
<v Speaker 1>you could say that a lot of the people who

0:50:45.280 --> 0:50:48.759
<v Speaker 1>are creating this misinformation, they're just following in the same

0:50:48.760 --> 0:50:54.759
<v Speaker 1>footsteps as ad executives and uh and and political operatives

0:50:54.920 --> 0:51:00.680
<v Speaker 1>have for for decades or longer. Um fax has always

0:51:00.719 --> 0:51:03.400
<v Speaker 1>been part of advertisement pretty much. Oh absolutely, no, I

0:51:03.440 --> 0:51:07.200
<v Speaker 1>mean you look back at like someone. The series mad

0:51:07.239 --> 0:51:12.840
<v Speaker 1>Men was based off of actual advertising executives who really

0:51:13.000 --> 0:51:17.680
<v Speaker 1>did find incredibly creative ways to convince people to buy

0:51:17.719 --> 0:51:20.839
<v Speaker 1>stuff that they didn't want or need. And the same

0:51:20.880 --> 0:51:25.839
<v Speaker 1>thing is true now about much more critical stuff like

0:51:26.200 --> 0:51:29.759
<v Speaker 1>who are leaders are or what policies we should adopt,

0:51:30.320 --> 0:51:34.000
<v Speaker 1>or what groups we should you know, pay attention to.

0:51:34.840 --> 0:51:38.640
<v Speaker 1>So it's a it's a you know, while we started

0:51:38.640 --> 0:51:42.719
<v Speaker 1>off kind of talking about folklore, the important thing is

0:51:42.760 --> 0:51:45.600
<v Speaker 1>that we need to be able to separate fiction from truth.

0:51:46.000 --> 0:51:48.920
<v Speaker 1>We can still enjoy fiction. I think stuff like creepy

0:51:48.920 --> 0:51:52.239
<v Speaker 1>pasta has a definitely has a place. It just has

0:51:52.239 --> 0:51:55.359
<v Speaker 1>a place as accepting it as hey, let's get around

0:51:55.400 --> 0:51:58.600
<v Speaker 1>the fire and tell ghost stories. Not come here. You

0:51:58.680 --> 0:52:03.440
<v Speaker 1>need to hear this because it might save your life. Yeah, right,

0:52:04.440 --> 0:52:07.239
<v Speaker 1>that's the difference. We have to be able to differentiate

0:52:07.280 --> 0:52:10.520
<v Speaker 1>those two things. If we don't, we're more likely than

0:52:10.560 --> 0:52:15.680
<v Speaker 1>not to act on incorrect information. So, Jeff, the killer

0:52:15.760 --> 0:52:17.920
<v Speaker 1>is not really in your bedroom. I sure hope not.

0:52:18.440 --> 0:52:22.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't have to clean. I would feel so awkward.

0:52:22.160 --> 0:52:26.080
<v Speaker 1>I'd be like, I'm so sorry for the mess. You've

0:52:26.120 --> 0:52:29.719
<v Speaker 1>been hanging around me too much, apologizing to just kill

0:52:29.800 --> 0:52:34.400
<v Speaker 1>me now because I feel so embarrassed. They'd be like, listen,

0:52:34.480 --> 0:52:37.600
<v Speaker 1>you've maybe he would help you clean it before. I'd say,

0:52:37.640 --> 0:52:42.640
<v Speaker 1>you made your bed, but you clearly haven't. Yeah, well,

0:52:42.680 --> 0:52:46.479
<v Speaker 1>I mean he's just gonna dirty it up anyway. Yeah,

0:52:46.760 --> 0:52:50.880
<v Speaker 1>that's true. Just stabby step stab, which ironically was the

0:52:51.000 --> 0:52:55.440
<v Speaker 1>name of the operation that the two girls who carried

0:52:55.440 --> 0:52:58.240
<v Speaker 1>out the slip. Yeah, they called it stabby step stab.

0:52:58.719 --> 0:53:03.960
<v Speaker 1>That is that's actually nothing. Yeah. I thought I was

0:53:04.000 --> 0:53:06.279
<v Speaker 1>just pulling that out of thin air, but then I remember, nope,

0:53:06.320 --> 0:53:08.520
<v Speaker 1>that's what they called that. So that was a callback,

0:53:08.960 --> 0:53:11.440
<v Speaker 1>not on purpose. That was just my brain sabotaging me.

0:53:13.440 --> 0:53:16.879
<v Speaker 1>Not not creative. I mean, I know that's the lack

0:53:16.920 --> 0:53:18.840
<v Speaker 1>of creativity is not the worst part of the story,

0:53:18.960 --> 0:53:23.640
<v Speaker 1>but problematic part of it. Well, Shaye, thank you for

0:53:23.719 --> 0:53:27.160
<v Speaker 1>your suggestion, Thank you for letting me come on the

0:53:27.360 --> 0:53:30.279
<v Speaker 1>show and annoy you. You didn't didn't annoy me at all.

0:53:30.360 --> 0:53:32.880
<v Speaker 1>It was very helpful, and I am glad to have

0:53:33.080 --> 0:53:37.200
<v Speaker 1>someone to talk with so that it you know, we

0:53:37.239 --> 0:53:39.600
<v Speaker 1>can have that sort of conversation and you can. You know,

0:53:40.239 --> 0:53:42.479
<v Speaker 1>you introduced me to stuff I had not heard about,

0:53:42.520 --> 0:53:45.320
<v Speaker 1>and I find a lot of it fascinating. You introduced

0:53:45.320 --> 0:53:47.440
<v Speaker 1>me to something I didn't know about that was written

0:53:47.480 --> 0:53:52.080
<v Speaker 1>by a guy I do know, which was weird. Yeah, yeah,

0:53:52.120 --> 0:53:54.160
<v Speaker 1>that was odd. Now I watched the show like in

0:53:54.239 --> 0:53:57.160
<v Speaker 1>its entirety. Now, yeah, now, he wrote the original Creepypasta.

0:53:57.200 --> 0:54:00.720
<v Speaker 1>I don't think he was connected to the show, except

0:54:00.800 --> 0:54:02.920
<v Speaker 1>maybe he probably got a credit. Yeah, I probably got

0:54:02.920 --> 0:54:05.360
<v Speaker 1>like a writer's credit or maybe even like a producer's credit.

0:54:05.440 --> 0:54:07.759
<v Speaker 1>I I honestly don't know. And honestly, it's not like

0:54:07.960 --> 0:54:10.680
<v Speaker 1>we're friends or anything. I literally interviewed him for an article.

0:54:10.840 --> 0:54:12.600
<v Speaker 1>So what he's saying is that he wants to be

0:54:12.600 --> 0:54:16.200
<v Speaker 1>your friends. I mean, that's true. It's true. It's true,

0:54:16.280 --> 0:54:20.520
<v Speaker 1>but it's not not relevant. Okay, So if you guys

0:54:20.560 --> 0:54:24.200
<v Speaker 1>have suggestions for future episodes of tech Stuff, or maybe

0:54:24.239 --> 0:54:26.280
<v Speaker 1>there's someone you want me to have on as a guest,

0:54:26.400 --> 0:54:28.920
<v Speaker 1>or maybe you think, why don't you have that shape

0:54:28.920 --> 0:54:31.920
<v Speaker 1>person on again? You need to let me know. You

0:54:31.960 --> 0:54:34.799
<v Speaker 1>can reach out to me on Facebook or Twitter. The

0:54:34.840 --> 0:54:37.680
<v Speaker 1>handle for both of those is text stuff H s

0:54:37.880 --> 0:54:45.480
<v Speaker 1>W and I'll talk to you again really soon. Text

0:54:45.480 --> 0:54:48.160
<v Speaker 1>Stuff is a production of I Heart Radio's How Stuff Works.

0:54:48.320 --> 0:54:51.160
<v Speaker 1>For more podcasts from my heart Radio, visit the i

0:54:51.239 --> 0:54:54.480
<v Speaker 1>heart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to

0:54:54.520 --> 0:54:55.440
<v Speaker 1>your favorite shows.