WEBVTT - 5/20, Hour 2: Called-Up Prospects, Pitchers, Pick of the Week and More

0:00:00.560 --> 0:00:03.640
<v Speaker 1>Hey, thanks for downloading the podcast, and remember, if you

0:00:03.680 --> 0:00:07.160
<v Speaker 1>want to listen live, download the I Heart Radio app,

0:00:07.240 --> 0:00:10.080
<v Speaker 1>download the tune and app and just search for Fantasy

0:00:10.240 --> 0:00:14.720
<v Speaker 1>Sports Radio Network and you could listen to this program live. Also,

0:00:14.920 --> 0:00:17.360
<v Speaker 1>if you want to watch the video of this podcast,

0:00:17.600 --> 0:00:21.000
<v Speaker 1>check us out on YouTube, on twitch, or on Periscope

0:00:21.120 --> 0:00:24.840
<v Speaker 1>and type in you guess dude, Fantasy Sports Network. You'll

0:00:24.880 --> 0:00:28.160
<v Speaker 1>find us there. Enjoy the show and thanks for listening.

0:00:30.240 --> 0:00:36.760
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Fantasy Sports Radio Network. Let me

0:00:36.880 --> 0:00:52.480
<v Speaker 1>just become best friends. Fantasy best friends forever. Our number

0:00:52.560 --> 0:00:55.320
<v Speaker 1>two Fantasy best friends forever. Fantasy Sports were Radio Network,

0:00:55.280 --> 0:00:58.440
<v Speaker 1>Franks Stample, Gregg Sussman Joy Now the first time, like

0:00:58.440 --> 0:01:01.760
<v Speaker 1>a week, it's like loser Chris, Chris, it's been a while,

0:01:01.800 --> 0:01:03.440
<v Speaker 1>it's been a while. It's up, guys. How you doing?

0:01:03.520 --> 0:01:07.200
<v Speaker 1>It's your boy the clothes of Chris Ventry here. Uh.

0:01:07.200 --> 0:01:10.280
<v Speaker 1>And last week you talk about fabrigadon. It's not a

0:01:10.319 --> 0:01:21.319
<v Speaker 1>thing you did, Nato Fabnado six Um that happened for

0:01:21.360 --> 0:01:26.120
<v Speaker 1>me like a month ago. Yeah, hen't believe it. You

0:01:26.200 --> 0:01:28.000
<v Speaker 1>got to spend it early. Who did you end up

0:01:28.000 --> 0:01:30.200
<v Speaker 1>getting because of that? Because you spent early, so that

0:01:30.200 --> 0:01:33.160
<v Speaker 1>that was my my biggest team, which I'm I'm two

0:01:33.160 --> 0:01:38.000
<v Speaker 1>and five, but it didn't work. But my team's not

0:01:38.120 --> 0:01:40.480
<v Speaker 1>bad on paper, Like the guys that are in there

0:01:40.480 --> 0:01:43.920
<v Speaker 1>are just not getting it done. Yeah, So like this

0:01:43.959 --> 0:01:45.679
<v Speaker 1>is why I think I want to go to Daly more.

0:01:46.560 --> 0:01:51.360
<v Speaker 1>The weekly format. I had Paddock, Boyd, Barrios and Nola

0:01:51.480 --> 0:01:53.880
<v Speaker 1>for two starts last week. All four of their first

0:01:53.880 --> 0:01:56.760
<v Speaker 1>thoughts they had under ten points, all four of them,

0:01:57.080 --> 0:01:58.800
<v Speaker 1>so they just got Scholl at the wrong time. I

0:01:58.800 --> 0:02:02.320
<v Speaker 1>had Montas on the bench pitch a gem. That's the problem.

0:02:02.360 --> 0:02:05.240
<v Speaker 1>I like daily so you can get all your guys in. Uh.

0:02:05.360 --> 0:02:07.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm not doing good in the Fantacy Pit leaguither that

0:02:07.240 --> 0:02:10.079
<v Speaker 1>team is just bad. But one of the teams five

0:02:10.120 --> 0:02:12.079
<v Speaker 1>and two and two leagues and I'm second place in another.

0:02:12.160 --> 0:02:15.399
<v Speaker 1>But it's just upsetting because my team is good because

0:02:15.440 --> 0:02:17.440
<v Speaker 1>I picked up good guys. I got Tarrocca, I got

0:02:17.520 --> 0:02:20.560
<v Speaker 1>you know a lot of good players. Um, and it's

0:02:20.600 --> 0:02:22.920
<v Speaker 1>just not it's just not working. It's just it just

0:02:22.960 --> 0:02:25.320
<v Speaker 1>doesn't culmulate to a win for the whole week each

0:02:25.360 --> 0:02:27.840
<v Speaker 1>week that I'm doing it two and five now. But

0:02:27.880 --> 0:02:29.359
<v Speaker 1>I think I can make a comeback we'll have to

0:02:29.360 --> 0:02:31.760
<v Speaker 1>get you back on track here venture. Yeah, talking about

0:02:31.800 --> 0:02:36.480
<v Speaker 1>the pit League. Yep, Greg, team coming alive a little

0:02:36.520 --> 0:02:41.480
<v Speaker 1>bit here, Greggy. Also, this was a lot because two

0:02:41.480 --> 0:02:45.320
<v Speaker 1>weeks ago I faced Yang and we had a big rivalry,

0:02:45.960 --> 0:02:48.520
<v Speaker 1>trying to like he's we've been talking smack to each other.

0:02:49.200 --> 0:02:52.360
<v Speaker 1>Team was just garbage that week and I lose to

0:02:52.440 --> 0:02:54.639
<v Speaker 1>him and he was like, I don't know, six or

0:02:54.680 --> 0:02:57.200
<v Speaker 1>seven place or whatever. And then last week this past week,

0:02:57.400 --> 0:03:00.360
<v Speaker 1>I faced the first team in Steve It my team

0:03:00.360 --> 0:03:03.639
<v Speaker 1>wakes up, So what the hell? I would have read

0:03:03.680 --> 0:03:09.360
<v Speaker 1>headed the week before so I could beat Yang h Man. Yeah,

0:03:09.639 --> 0:03:11.600
<v Speaker 1>let's take a win. I got your boy though, Alex

0:03:11.639 --> 0:03:14.800
<v Speaker 1>Smith on that team now, Alex Smith, let's go Frank.

0:03:14.960 --> 0:03:17.679
<v Speaker 1>What's up Greg? We've played each other this week? Oh

0:03:18.040 --> 0:03:22.320
<v Speaker 1>easy for me. I have a two start minding me?

0:03:22.320 --> 0:03:23.960
<v Speaker 1>I got oh, I guessaid my lineup? Thanks for reminding me.

0:03:24.120 --> 0:03:27.359
<v Speaker 1>Man has two starters today though, oh j D. Martinez

0:03:27.400 --> 0:03:29.160
<v Speaker 1>not on the lineup for the one o'clock game. Come on,

0:03:29.440 --> 0:03:34.000
<v Speaker 1>has two starters today, including that chick Carbon. Yes you

0:03:34.440 --> 0:03:37.440
<v Speaker 1>like the Mets, He's gonna crush them. It was like

0:03:37.440 --> 0:03:39.520
<v Speaker 1>the fifth time he's already played them this year. Greg,

0:03:39.800 --> 0:03:42.000
<v Speaker 1>you think that this worry, by the way, was available

0:03:42.040 --> 0:03:46.640
<v Speaker 1>waivers Hansel robles. Dude, someone did it yesterday and it

0:03:46.720 --> 0:03:49.720
<v Speaker 1>wasn't Hansel Robless really it was. It was Wandy Peralta.

0:03:50.040 --> 0:03:52.120
<v Speaker 1>I was gonna send it to you, but I was like, you,

0:03:52.120 --> 0:03:55.560
<v Speaker 1>guys probably don't care about a Wandy Peralta. Who's Wandy Peralta.

0:03:55.680 --> 0:03:59.160
<v Speaker 1>He is the he's he's a left handed, okay, left

0:03:59.160 --> 0:04:03.440
<v Speaker 1>handed reliever. So he gives up bomb too straight away center.

0:04:03.440 --> 0:04:05.320
<v Speaker 1>I think it might have been to Cody Bounder, left,

0:04:05.360 --> 0:04:07.520
<v Speaker 1>young lefty, and he goes he was like this, oh,

0:04:07.560 --> 0:04:10.960
<v Speaker 1>catch it, catch it, and then it lands over the wall.

0:04:11.680 --> 0:04:15.040
<v Speaker 1>It was like, come on, man, so only one person

0:04:15.120 --> 0:04:18.560
<v Speaker 1>could do that. It's Hansel Robots. Stop stealing this bit

0:04:18.600 --> 0:04:22.800
<v Speaker 1>come executed poorly by Wandy Wandy giving up dangers to

0:04:22.839 --> 0:04:25.560
<v Speaker 1>Cody Bounder. How's your weekend, Chris? It was good. I

0:04:25.600 --> 0:04:27.880
<v Speaker 1>went to Long Island, visited a friend who just had

0:04:27.880 --> 0:04:30.800
<v Speaker 1>a kid four months ago. Nice. So, you know, I

0:04:30.880 --> 0:04:32.560
<v Speaker 1>did a lot of things. I didn't get to catch

0:04:32.560 --> 0:04:34.719
<v Speaker 1>a ton of baseball of the weekend because I was out,

0:04:35.080 --> 0:04:38.040
<v Speaker 1>but um, you know, that's the way of the world.

0:04:38.040 --> 0:04:39.480
<v Speaker 1>What am I gonna do is the way of the

0:04:39.520 --> 0:04:41.320
<v Speaker 1>world when it comes to baseball. I want to start

0:04:41.880 --> 0:04:43.960
<v Speaker 1>with the Los Angeles Dodgers from yesterdays, where we're we

0:04:43.960 --> 0:04:46.760
<v Speaker 1>getting today's recap portion of the program, and we'll begin

0:04:47.000 --> 0:04:50.360
<v Speaker 1>within Jenn Rio, who have leaven now to thirty two

0:04:50.400 --> 0:04:55.239
<v Speaker 1>consecutive scoreless innings. Last night, seven innings, five hits, five kids,

0:04:55.320 --> 0:04:58.480
<v Speaker 1>he walked one. He has been tremendously ear a for

0:04:58.760 --> 0:05:02.840
<v Speaker 1>who sits at one point five two. I recognize he's

0:05:02.839 --> 0:05:05.360
<v Speaker 1>facing the reds, but Frank, he's really coming to his own.

0:05:05.480 --> 0:05:07.200
<v Speaker 1>It's all about health. Now we know all the effect

0:05:07.240 --> 0:05:10.480
<v Speaker 1>it he is. That's exactly right, and he's been really good,

0:05:10.520 --> 0:05:13.000
<v Speaker 1>even going back to the second half of last year

0:05:13.040 --> 0:05:16.480
<v Speaker 1>and not really doing anything drastically different with his pitching

0:05:16.600 --> 0:05:20.000
<v Speaker 1>arsenal this year, but the results they're just there, I

0:05:20.000 --> 0:05:22.520
<v Speaker 1>mean almost a strikeout for ending. It's the command. Really,

0:05:22.560 --> 0:05:25.920
<v Speaker 1>it's the fact that he's not walking anybody. He zero

0:05:26.080 --> 0:05:28.600
<v Speaker 1>point six one walks per nine and he really started

0:05:28.640 --> 0:05:31.800
<v Speaker 1>to fix that problem last year when he he averaged

0:05:31.800 --> 0:05:35.599
<v Speaker 1>just one point six walks per nine in seen that

0:05:35.720 --> 0:05:38.159
<v Speaker 1>was over three. So this is something that he's progressively

0:05:38.200 --> 0:05:40.640
<v Speaker 1>gotten better at and I think the fact that he's

0:05:40.640 --> 0:05:42.839
<v Speaker 1>shown good command in terms of not walking batters, he

0:05:42.880 --> 0:05:45.000
<v Speaker 1>also is showing good command in terms of where he

0:05:45.120 --> 0:05:48.479
<v Speaker 1>is putting pitches and which is obviously putting him in

0:05:48.520 --> 0:05:50.440
<v Speaker 1>position to be the best possible picture that he can

0:05:50.480 --> 0:05:53.240
<v Speaker 1>be and gets good run support with the Dodgers. So

0:05:53.520 --> 0:05:56.159
<v Speaker 1>he's now six and one. Uh. The left on base

0:05:56.200 --> 0:06:00.400
<v Speaker 1>percentage right on the strand rate is even here was

0:06:00.440 --> 0:06:02.960
<v Speaker 1>eighty five percent, which is also higher than league average.

0:06:03.000 --> 0:06:05.240
<v Speaker 1>But he's someone who's over the past three years has

0:06:05.240 --> 0:06:07.200
<v Speaker 1>been really good at pitching with runners on base, So

0:06:07.480 --> 0:06:09.040
<v Speaker 1>that's gonna come down a little bit. He's not gonna

0:06:09.040 --> 0:06:11.000
<v Speaker 1>have a sub two e r A. But Greggy, if

0:06:11.000 --> 0:06:14.240
<v Speaker 1>you drafted this guy after the you know, first forty

0:06:14.320 --> 0:06:18.360
<v Speaker 1>starting pitchers, you're you're reaping massive benefits, right. I mean,

0:06:18.360 --> 0:06:21.320
<v Speaker 1>he's been picking like a top fifteen starting pitcher right now.

0:06:21.360 --> 0:06:23.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if they'll keep that up, but you know,

0:06:23.240 --> 0:06:25.280
<v Speaker 1>I'd be willing to put him inside the top thirty

0:06:25.320 --> 0:06:27.440
<v Speaker 1>right now, top twenty five with the way he's pitching.

0:06:27.560 --> 0:06:31.280
<v Speaker 1>Trust him n SP three, maybe even low NSP two.

0:06:31.440 --> 0:06:34.800
<v Speaker 1>Trust him absolutely. I don't trust him to stay health

0:06:34.920 --> 0:06:37.080
<v Speaker 1>that's the thing. But when he's on the mant I

0:06:37.080 --> 0:06:39.120
<v Speaker 1>think he's gonna be really damn good venture Yeah, and

0:06:39.160 --> 0:06:42.160
<v Speaker 1>he always pretty much has been. I mean, anytime he pitches,

0:06:42.279 --> 0:06:44.920
<v Speaker 1>you're getting a good game out of him. That's been

0:06:44.920 --> 0:06:48.280
<v Speaker 1>throughout his whole career really and it's just about the health.

0:06:48.560 --> 0:06:51.080
<v Speaker 1>But obviously you're not gonna get this good the whole season.

0:06:51.320 --> 0:06:54.240
<v Speaker 1>This is lights out, like you know, elite, and he

0:06:54.320 --> 0:06:56.000
<v Speaker 1>will falter here and there at some point, but you

0:06:56.000 --> 0:06:57.240
<v Speaker 1>know where you're gonna get him. For the most part,

0:06:57.279 --> 0:07:00.000
<v Speaker 1>he's gonna be consistent. He's gonna get it done. Uh

0:07:00.160 --> 0:07:03.400
<v Speaker 1>low walk great good whip. You just gotta worry, you know,

0:07:03.800 --> 0:07:06.240
<v Speaker 1>is he gonna get hurt? And the answer is probably

0:07:06.279 --> 0:07:08.800
<v Speaker 1>yes at some point. Do you try already did this year?

0:07:08.760 --> 0:07:10.280
<v Speaker 1>Do you try and sell him just based on that

0:07:10.360 --> 0:07:13.880
<v Speaker 1>injury risk with this type of lead production, I might

0:07:14.480 --> 0:07:16.960
<v Speaker 1>because you could probably get something good. What as always question,

0:07:17.040 --> 0:07:19.760
<v Speaker 1>what can you get for him? Right? Right? And I

0:07:19.800 --> 0:07:22.440
<v Speaker 1>don't I don't know the name. We always go back to.

0:07:22.560 --> 0:07:26.640
<v Speaker 1>That's where I'll start. Who's your other Have hend Ryan

0:07:26.760 --> 0:07:31.320
<v Speaker 1>or Jack Flaherty. I'd rather have Flaherty. It's hard to

0:07:31.400 --> 0:07:33.840
<v Speaker 1>argue with the production of Ryu though. Man, I'm looking

0:07:33.840 --> 0:07:35.520
<v Speaker 1>at my home league right now. It's a points league.

0:07:35.920 --> 0:07:40.480
<v Speaker 1>He's the speel overall, he's SP three. It's hard to

0:07:40.560 --> 0:07:43.080
<v Speaker 1>argue with that type of production. Even as much as

0:07:43.160 --> 0:07:47.480
<v Speaker 1>I love Jack Flaherty, man, he hasn't been I think

0:07:47.520 --> 0:07:50.280
<v Speaker 1>in the Roto League, I would probably stick with Ryu

0:07:50.320 --> 0:07:54.600
<v Speaker 1>Greg because that goes back to quality greater signy. So

0:07:55.520 --> 0:07:58.560
<v Speaker 1>in the Roto League, I don't really care if you

0:07:58.560 --> 0:08:00.720
<v Speaker 1>give me two as if you give a hundred fifty

0:08:00.720 --> 0:08:04.680
<v Speaker 1>innings of like, really really elite production, that's almost more

0:08:04.760 --> 0:08:06.640
<v Speaker 1>valuable than a guy who gives you two dred innings

0:08:06.640 --> 0:08:09.480
<v Speaker 1>pitched of you know, maybe a mid threes e r A.

0:08:09.560 --> 0:08:10.680
<v Speaker 1>But if this guy is gonna give you a sub

0:08:10.760 --> 0:08:12.600
<v Speaker 1>three e r A really good whip a strikeout for

0:08:12.760 --> 0:08:15.520
<v Speaker 1>ending for a hundred and fifty innings in Rhodo, I

0:08:15.560 --> 0:08:17.720
<v Speaker 1>think I would probably just stick with Ryo. Yeah, I

0:08:17.720 --> 0:08:21.360
<v Speaker 1>would go with Ryoty as well. Listening, I don't know

0:08:21.400 --> 0:08:23.920
<v Speaker 1>how he'll continue to do what he's doing and for

0:08:23.920 --> 0:08:26.480
<v Speaker 1>how long because he'll be hurt. But you put it out.

0:08:26.560 --> 0:08:28.600
<v Speaker 1>It's not just a month now or two months. It

0:08:28.680 --> 0:08:31.080
<v Speaker 1>was towards the end of last year as well. He's

0:08:31.080 --> 0:08:33.000
<v Speaker 1>coming to his own at thirty two years old. He

0:08:33.080 --> 0:08:35.960
<v Speaker 1>wasn't always this guy. Thinks have changed and obviously very

0:08:36.000 --> 0:08:38.680
<v Speaker 1>much for the better for Los Angeles and four hundred

0:08:38.760 --> 0:08:44.559
<v Speaker 1>ryot who seven seven, eight, eight pitches yesterday. It's super

0:08:44.640 --> 0:08:47.520
<v Speaker 1>efficient too. Yeah, he's doing it because he's not understand

0:08:47.520 --> 0:08:49.719
<v Speaker 1>it's against the Reds. But the guy has been doing

0:08:49.720 --> 0:08:51.440
<v Speaker 1>it all season long. He's made nine starts, they haven't

0:08:51.440 --> 0:08:53.800
<v Speaker 1>all been against the Reds. And he's two r A.

0:08:54.800 --> 0:08:57.200
<v Speaker 1>He star like numbers two six fIF two six nine

0:08:57.280 --> 0:09:01.839
<v Speaker 1>x fit three point zero zero. But everything is sub three.

0:09:01.960 --> 0:09:04.679
<v Speaker 1>So he's still really damn good. Even if even if

0:09:04.679 --> 0:09:07.480
<v Speaker 1>he regresses a little bit, we should still expect a

0:09:07.480 --> 0:09:09.160
<v Speaker 1>sub three ear A when he's on the map. It's

0:09:09.240 --> 0:09:11.480
<v Speaker 1>it's just crazy to say he's averaging the most points,

0:09:12.200 --> 0:09:15.560
<v Speaker 1>uh for starting pitchers in my league right now. But

0:09:15.840 --> 0:09:19.840
<v Speaker 1>well Clevinger was, but you know, obviously he's gone, Um,

0:09:19.880 --> 0:09:22.400
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. I mean, listen, that's the question though,

0:09:22.520 --> 0:09:26.080
<v Speaker 1>Like Flaherty, Yeah, you're right. This season in a in

0:09:26.120 --> 0:09:29.440
<v Speaker 1>a rodal league, I'd rather have r you because the

0:09:29.480 --> 0:09:32.920
<v Speaker 1>production has been consistently good. And even if he doesn't

0:09:32.920 --> 0:09:36.040
<v Speaker 1>go for you know, a quality start. He's still getting

0:09:36.080 --> 0:09:38.080
<v Speaker 1>you a good start. You know, he's still getting a

0:09:38.120 --> 0:09:40.920
<v Speaker 1>low whip for you. The thing is in a keeper's league,

0:09:40.920 --> 0:09:43.800
<v Speaker 1>I rather have flawered, you know. Yeah, that makes sense,

0:09:44.120 --> 0:09:46.679
<v Speaker 1>like because you know eventually he's going to figure it out.

0:09:46.679 --> 0:09:48.800
<v Speaker 1>Flaherty is still going through some growing pains and stuff.

0:09:48.840 --> 0:09:51.280
<v Speaker 1>He's still a young guy. I think Flowerty will be

0:09:51.280 --> 0:09:54.040
<v Speaker 1>just fine. Yeah, I just do look quality start yesterday

0:09:54.040 --> 0:09:55.920
<v Speaker 1>and in a tough spots, pitch in two in Texas,

0:09:56.000 --> 0:10:00.040
<v Speaker 1>So building some confidence there. Great Dick sais il So

0:10:00.559 --> 0:10:02.880
<v Speaker 1>he's what fifth phase of the year yesterday? You like

0:10:02.960 --> 0:10:05.560
<v Speaker 1>to see that for makes sense? No, that's fantastic. Um.

0:10:06.520 --> 0:10:10.000
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to quickly mention Tenner Roark because he's ugly.

0:10:10.120 --> 0:10:12.040
<v Speaker 1>He's he's you're kind of player, Frank, He's an old,

0:10:12.559 --> 0:10:18.880
<v Speaker 1>ugly veteran. But I don't mean he's how he looks.

0:10:18.880 --> 0:10:22.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't like the way he pitched yes yes five innings,

0:10:22.800 --> 0:10:25.280
<v Speaker 1>only two hits, did walk three, short out seven, but

0:10:25.360 --> 0:10:27.920
<v Speaker 1>allowed two runs against the Dodgers, best team in baseball.

0:10:28.400 --> 0:10:32.760
<v Speaker 1>So he's ere A only three those five innings. He's

0:10:32.840 --> 0:10:37.360
<v Speaker 1>e r A. Sits at three point five one. He

0:10:37.559 --> 0:10:42.880
<v Speaker 1>is allowed three runs or less in every start except one.

0:10:43.280 --> 0:10:44.560
<v Speaker 1>He does not gonna go to keep in the games.

0:10:44.600 --> 0:10:47.040
<v Speaker 1>He has not gone longer than six innings in any

0:10:47.120 --> 0:10:51.480
<v Speaker 1>single game this season, and he only want six innings twice, sorry,

0:10:51.840 --> 0:10:55.560
<v Speaker 1>longer than six, and he hasn't gone longer than six

0:10:55.640 --> 0:11:02.360
<v Speaker 1>innings though more than twice. That's it interesting, not really.

0:11:02.480 --> 0:11:05.040
<v Speaker 1>The underlying numbers are just not great here when it

0:11:05.080 --> 0:11:08.280
<v Speaker 1>comes to Santa ro Ark. He's got uh career high

0:11:08.280 --> 0:11:10.720
<v Speaker 1>in strikeouts right now, eight point seven seven case per nine,

0:11:10.760 --> 0:11:12.640
<v Speaker 1>but his swinging strike creed is actually lower than it

0:11:12.720 --> 0:11:15.200
<v Speaker 1>was last year. Last year was at eight point four percent,

0:11:15.240 --> 0:11:17.400
<v Speaker 1>which was already below league average, and this year it's

0:11:17.440 --> 0:11:19.920
<v Speaker 1>eight point two percent. So that leads me to believe

0:11:20.000 --> 0:11:22.280
<v Speaker 1>that these strikeouts this here are a little bit flukey.

0:11:22.800 --> 0:11:25.760
<v Speaker 1>He's also walking more batters than ever before four point

0:11:25.880 --> 0:11:29.480
<v Speaker 1>zero three walks per nine, and he hasn't given up

0:11:29.559 --> 0:11:31.760
<v Speaker 1>home runs yet, and that's why you see the extra

0:11:31.960 --> 0:11:34.680
<v Speaker 1>at four point five nine, because they're gonna come eventually.

0:11:34.880 --> 0:11:37.719
<v Speaker 1>He pitches in Cincinnati, great American small park, h and

0:11:37.760 --> 0:11:39.600
<v Speaker 1>he gives up a lot of hard contact thirty nine

0:11:39.679 --> 0:11:43.160
<v Speaker 1>percent hard contact right now. His chase rate is down

0:11:43.240 --> 0:11:45.480
<v Speaker 1>this year, his first pitch strike percentage. I think he's

0:11:45.600 --> 0:11:48.199
<v Speaker 1>been a little bit fortunate. He he's a guy that

0:11:48.240 --> 0:11:51.600
<v Speaker 1>should be owned, obviously, and only maybe fifteen teamers um,

0:11:51.920 --> 0:11:54.680
<v Speaker 1>but an't even shallower than that, Like in my standard

0:11:54.720 --> 0:11:56.760
<v Speaker 1>twelve team home league. I'm not picking him up bench.

0:11:56.760 --> 0:11:59.040
<v Speaker 1>Are you picking him up? No? But I might stream him,

0:11:59.240 --> 0:12:03.040
<v Speaker 1>you know here in there because it's in the National

0:12:03.120 --> 0:12:05.040
<v Speaker 1>League Central, which is a tough vision. Like you're gonna

0:12:05.080 --> 0:12:07.000
<v Speaker 1>get the Brewers, you're gonna get the Cardinals, the Cubs,

0:12:07.400 --> 0:12:10.079
<v Speaker 1>and you pitch in great American ballpark. So it's just

0:12:10.320 --> 0:12:13.320
<v Speaker 1>it's a tough situation, tough overall for tana roor as

0:12:13.320 --> 0:12:14.840
<v Speaker 1>good as he's been. I just think it's a little

0:12:14.840 --> 0:12:17.320
<v Speaker 1>bit fluky. Yeah, I agree with you in the sense

0:12:17.400 --> 0:12:19.360
<v Speaker 1>that you know, three five one, this is like the

0:12:19.440 --> 0:12:21.240
<v Speaker 1>lowest I feel like his are a really could be.

0:12:21.559 --> 0:12:23.839
<v Speaker 1>You know, you're getting his his best right now, and

0:12:23.920 --> 0:12:26.240
<v Speaker 1>he still gives up a lot of hits fifty one innings,

0:12:26.280 --> 0:12:29.760
<v Speaker 1>fifty hits UM, fifty strikeouts though what you do like?

0:12:30.440 --> 0:12:33.760
<v Speaker 1>But I don't know, like I You're right, I think

0:12:34.000 --> 0:12:36.160
<v Speaker 1>eventually he's gonna have some blow ups. He's not gonna

0:12:36.240 --> 0:12:38.000
<v Speaker 1>keep it like this. But he is a pretty good picture.

0:12:38.000 --> 0:12:40.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean, he's not a bad picture. It's just that

0:12:40.240 --> 0:12:41.840
<v Speaker 1>you gotta get him in the right spot. So you'd

0:12:41.840 --> 0:12:43.360
<v Speaker 1>want to pick him up in a two star stream

0:12:43.360 --> 0:12:46.160
<v Speaker 1>against San Francisco and San Diego something whatever, you know,

0:12:46.480 --> 0:12:48.120
<v Speaker 1>Like that's how you're gonna play it. You're not gonna

0:12:48.280 --> 0:12:50.199
<v Speaker 1>hold him on your roster and throw him in for

0:12:50.320 --> 0:12:52.920
<v Speaker 1>a one start because at any point he even if

0:12:52.960 --> 0:12:54.480
<v Speaker 1>he does have a good start, he might have a

0:12:54.480 --> 0:12:55.840
<v Speaker 1>lot of case. You might have a lot of walks

0:12:55.840 --> 0:12:57.440
<v Speaker 1>and then you're like, all right, so you only got

0:12:57.520 --> 0:12:59.079
<v Speaker 1>like fifteen points out of that, it's not worth it.

0:12:59.480 --> 0:13:01.199
<v Speaker 1>You know, there's better guys out there. I agree you

0:13:01.280 --> 0:13:03.280
<v Speaker 1>fifteen teamers. I think he should be on them. Yeah,

0:13:03.360 --> 0:13:05.280
<v Speaker 1>in the right situation right, Like kind of reminds me

0:13:05.320 --> 0:13:07.120
<v Speaker 1>of another veteran. I know you hate him, Greg, but

0:13:07.160 --> 0:13:08.839
<v Speaker 1>like Jeff some margin, like in the right spot he

0:13:08.880 --> 0:13:11.800
<v Speaker 1>pitches in San Francisco to Star week like something like that. Yeah,

0:13:11.800 --> 0:13:13.920
<v Speaker 1>I could see getting behind. So you pick and choose

0:13:13.920 --> 0:13:15.920
<v Speaker 1>your spots with Tanner Roark. But I would say in

0:13:16.040 --> 0:13:19.599
<v Speaker 1>my standard twelve team league, I'm not really that enthusiastic

0:13:19.640 --> 0:13:21.320
<v Speaker 1>abou him. Look at the whip. The whip is one

0:13:21.360 --> 0:13:23.440
<v Speaker 1>point four two and p RRA is three point five,

0:13:23.559 --> 0:13:26.200
<v Speaker 1>so normally those things are correlated. Based on a one

0:13:26.240 --> 0:13:28.720
<v Speaker 1>point four to whip, his e r A should probably

0:13:28.840 --> 0:13:31.280
<v Speaker 1>be over four. So and you see a whip that high,

0:13:31.320 --> 0:13:33.360
<v Speaker 1>you think he's been a little bit lucky so far, right,

0:13:33.400 --> 0:13:36.559
<v Speaker 1>and in his career, you know, his r A is

0:13:36.760 --> 0:13:39.520
<v Speaker 1>pretty much around four, like I mean, well, it's three

0:13:39.640 --> 0:13:41.960
<v Speaker 1>five nine for his career, but that's because of earlier

0:13:42.040 --> 0:13:44.040
<v Speaker 1>seasons when he was really good. But his past two

0:13:44.120 --> 0:13:46.240
<v Speaker 1>years he's been four point three four high four point

0:13:46.280 --> 0:13:48.760
<v Speaker 1>six seven. Yeah, right, so you know what he is.

0:13:48.800 --> 0:13:50.480
<v Speaker 1>He's a four r A pitcher. He's not a bad

0:13:50.480 --> 0:13:52.880
<v Speaker 1>pitcher though, to have just wanted to ask that given

0:13:52.920 --> 0:13:55.560
<v Speaker 1>the old veteran status that you like to talk about, Frank,

0:13:56.760 --> 0:13:59.680
<v Speaker 1>I don't like this picture that you painted me better.

0:13:59.800 --> 0:14:01.960
<v Speaker 1>Is is that true? You're actually the veteran of the show.

0:14:02.360 --> 0:14:04.640
<v Speaker 1>I am, yeah for sure. But when it comes to

0:14:04.760 --> 0:14:06.959
<v Speaker 1>liking old guys, you like veterans though, I thought you

0:14:07.040 --> 0:14:10.160
<v Speaker 1>were the veteran you love, you know, like Daniel Murphy

0:14:10.280 --> 0:14:14.920
<v Speaker 1>and Justin Turner right there there, what about like Jordan's

0:14:15.000 --> 0:14:17.640
<v Speaker 1>Ermanhommer Bailey. Oh yeah, well you talked me into the

0:14:21.240 --> 0:14:23.000
<v Speaker 1>there's one. Who's the guy last week that I had

0:14:23.040 --> 0:14:27.120
<v Speaker 1>to sit here and Yellow wasn't here. We were talking

0:14:27.320 --> 0:14:29.760
<v Speaker 1>major crap about him earlier in the season. Started in

0:14:29.840 --> 0:14:31.480
<v Speaker 1>the league last week and he had a quality start

0:14:31.480 --> 0:14:36.040
<v Speaker 1>against the Yankees. Runs. I'm bad she started. Don't start

0:14:36.080 --> 0:14:38.960
<v Speaker 1>this week, including tonight the Yankees. He is in that lineup?

0:14:39.280 --> 0:14:46.320
<v Speaker 1>Is I'm desperate. I lost Paxton, I lost Valdi's understandable. Yeah,

0:14:49.360 --> 0:14:52.080
<v Speaker 1>but I would advise everyone don't use Andrew Cashier this week.

0:14:52.200 --> 0:14:54.560
<v Speaker 1>Don't do what I'm doing. I'm just really desperate. You,

0:14:54.720 --> 0:14:59.280
<v Speaker 1>as I say, not what I do. Speaking of great performances,

0:15:00.000 --> 0:15:03.200
<v Speaker 1>O were the Mets here, gentlemen for a moment. Sandyel

0:15:03.240 --> 0:15:08.360
<v Speaker 1>Gantara pitched eighty nine pitches in a complete game, shutout

0:15:09.200 --> 0:15:12.000
<v Speaker 1>two hits, one walk aloud. He struck out eight in

0:15:12.120 --> 0:15:14.440
<v Speaker 1>the pit league. I was between picking up as a

0:15:14.480 --> 0:15:16.760
<v Speaker 1>streamer Ronaldo Limpez or Sandy all Gantara. I was looking

0:15:16.880 --> 0:15:19.560
<v Speaker 1>like a quality start. Sandiel Guitar has gonna quality start

0:15:19.600 --> 0:15:22.000
<v Speaker 1>in months, So like I think that right now. The

0:15:22.080 --> 0:15:24.440
<v Speaker 1>Lillapez gave you a quality start? Who gave me a

0:15:24.480 --> 0:15:27.440
<v Speaker 1>quality start? He was good. All guitar was amazing. Yes,

0:15:27.520 --> 0:15:30.600
<v Speaker 1>he based the Mets. Now No Syndergar was also like,

0:15:30.920 --> 0:15:38.400
<v Speaker 1>finally only Stu got three? What's going on? By the

0:15:38.480 --> 0:15:42.680
<v Speaker 1>Miami Marlins? They had three hits in back to back games,

0:15:42.720 --> 0:15:47.480
<v Speaker 1>total three hits? What's wrong? It's yesterday and then on Saturday.

0:15:47.600 --> 0:15:50.440
<v Speaker 1>Actually figured this out because I heard John Sterling talking

0:15:50.480 --> 0:15:52.600
<v Speaker 1>about it during yet the Yankee game yesterday. He says,

0:15:52.880 --> 0:15:56.480
<v Speaker 1>how about this, Susan. The Mets had a leadoff double

0:15:56.560 --> 0:15:59.880
<v Speaker 1>from Jeff McNeil on Saturday. They didn't get another hit

0:16:00.040 --> 0:16:03.920
<v Speaker 1>the entire game. How about that? You know, how does

0:16:04.000 --> 0:16:08.000
<v Speaker 1>that work out? It's crazy? Why the same last? I

0:16:08.040 --> 0:16:10.240
<v Speaker 1>feel like he's like kind of like somewhere there and

0:16:10.640 --> 0:16:13.160
<v Speaker 1>sounding like that. But yeah, look, Sandy al Katara was

0:16:13.240 --> 0:16:15.240
<v Speaker 1>great yesterday. I think you could just stream him every

0:16:15.320 --> 0:16:17.600
<v Speaker 1>time he faces the Mets. Crazy seems like, even going

0:16:17.680 --> 0:16:20.520
<v Speaker 1>back to last year he owned the Mets. But great

0:16:20.560 --> 0:16:23.880
<v Speaker 1>game for him overall, two hitch, shut out, eight eight strikeouts,

0:16:24.040 --> 0:16:26.480
<v Speaker 1>nineteen swinging strikes on eighty nine pitches. He had nine

0:16:26.480 --> 0:16:29.320
<v Speaker 1>ground ball out as well. Yesterday. What I really like

0:16:29.840 --> 0:16:32.360
<v Speaker 1>is the fact that he only walked one venture Because

0:16:32.440 --> 0:16:35.840
<v Speaker 1>for Sandy al Kantara, I think he's talented. But as

0:16:35.920 --> 0:16:37.920
<v Speaker 1>we say about a lot of young pictures, and you know,

0:16:38.080 --> 0:16:40.320
<v Speaker 1>it's funny you bring up Ronaldo Lopez, they actually kind

0:16:40.360 --> 0:16:42.920
<v Speaker 1>of remind remind me of each other. Is that Sandy

0:16:42.920 --> 0:16:45.000
<v Speaker 1>al Kantara throws really hard and he has good stuff,

0:16:45.160 --> 0:16:46.240
<v Speaker 1>but I think a lot of the time he just

0:16:46.320 --> 0:16:48.360
<v Speaker 1>doesn't know where it's going. So for me, the most

0:16:48.720 --> 0:16:51.400
<v Speaker 1>impressive part for him was just one walk yesterday nine innings.

0:16:51.400 --> 0:16:54.560
<v Speaker 1>Pitched absolute gem and it was against the Mets, who

0:16:54.600 --> 0:16:57.040
<v Speaker 1>have been cold as ice. But I mean, you're not

0:16:57.080 --> 0:16:59.600
<v Speaker 1>picking this guy like we're not. I mean he picked

0:16:59.760 --> 0:17:02.040
<v Speaker 1>up for Stream. Maybe he's like I could get behind it.

0:17:02.080 --> 0:17:05.760
<v Speaker 1>Look like he pitches in. So yeah, it's wins on

0:17:05.880 --> 0:17:07.919
<v Speaker 1>stuff like tough division. You don't want to use them

0:17:07.920 --> 0:17:12.240
<v Speaker 1>against the nationals of the Phillies obviously. I think similarly

0:17:12.359 --> 0:17:14.600
<v Speaker 1>to Tanner row Arc, I think you pick and choose

0:17:14.600 --> 0:17:16.440
<v Speaker 1>your spots with a guy like all Kantara, but I

0:17:16.480 --> 0:17:17.919
<v Speaker 1>do think that he has more upside than a guy

0:17:17.960 --> 0:17:20.359
<v Speaker 1>like Row. To listen to be learned is pitch your

0:17:20.359 --> 0:17:23.119
<v Speaker 1>pictures against the Mets. Yes, you Spencer turn Bill this

0:17:23.160 --> 0:17:25.880
<v Speaker 1>week because hes the Mets and the Marlins. Oh Man,

0:17:28.280 --> 0:17:31.919
<v Speaker 1>we went back next from the NFL to the NBA.

0:17:32.119 --> 0:17:34.400
<v Speaker 1>Daily Rohodo dot Com is the place to win millions

0:17:34.440 --> 0:17:37.000
<v Speaker 1>in Daily Fantasy. You can get the best DFS NFL

0:17:37.040 --> 0:17:40.600
<v Speaker 1>coverage all season long for a price of one, or

0:17:40.680 --> 0:17:43.560
<v Speaker 1>dominate the entire Daily Fantasy Sports realm with the Elite

0:17:43.600 --> 0:17:46.920
<v Speaker 1>package at months. If you use the promo code f

0:17:47.080 --> 0:17:49.480
<v Speaker 1>n T s Y, you get ten percent off your

0:17:49.640 --> 0:17:52.200
<v Speaker 1>Daily Rodo package. Go to Daily Rodo dot Com, pick

0:17:52.240 --> 0:17:55.040
<v Speaker 1>your NFL Elite Package, enter promo code f n T

0:17:55.240 --> 0:17:57.240
<v Speaker 1>s Y, and you'll be on your way to becoming

0:17:57.320 --> 0:18:15.879
<v Speaker 1>the next Daily Rhodo Millionaire. Fantasy best Friends Forever Fantasy

0:18:15.880 --> 0:18:19.160
<v Speaker 1>Sports Radio Network Frank Stafell, Chris ben stro I am

0:18:19.400 --> 0:18:22.480
<v Speaker 1>Greg staining a look at some of the performances over

0:18:22.520 --> 0:18:27.560
<v Speaker 1>the weekend that their paying attention to, and I realized

0:18:27.600 --> 0:18:30.560
<v Speaker 1>it was against the Orioles. But what Shane Bieber did

0:18:30.680 --> 0:18:34.280
<v Speaker 1>yesterday we have to talk about because we all had

0:18:34.320 --> 0:18:38.840
<v Speaker 1>the fever yesterday. fIF Teen strikeoutsen Bieber over a complete

0:18:38.880 --> 0:18:40.720
<v Speaker 1>game shut up for him as well, five hits. He

0:18:40.800 --> 0:18:44.600
<v Speaker 1>didn't walk anybody over his one d and seven pitches. Frank, Yeah,

0:18:44.600 --> 0:18:47.320
<v Speaker 1>it's just absolutely phenomenal. Here. I was watching a lot

0:18:47.400 --> 0:18:49.120
<v Speaker 1>of this start early on, and you could just tell,

0:18:49.640 --> 0:18:51.960
<v Speaker 1>I think after these past couple of starts he was

0:18:52.040 --> 0:18:54.240
<v Speaker 1>upset at himself. His last start off he allowed four

0:18:54.320 --> 0:18:56.520
<v Speaker 1>home runs, He allowed five runs total, and we sat

0:18:56.600 --> 0:18:59.040
<v Speaker 1>right here and we said, no, maybe maybe the stuff

0:18:59.080 --> 0:19:01.440
<v Speaker 1>just isn't that good. Maybe you stuff to say, all right, Well,

0:19:02.119 --> 0:19:05.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm I lied, I'm sorry, storry again. Shane Bieber on

0:19:05.760 --> 0:19:11.040
<v Speaker 1>seven swinging strikes yesterday, swinging strikes, fifteen strikeouts, both career highs,

0:19:11.119 --> 0:19:13.400
<v Speaker 1>going nine innings. Pitch that was also a career high,

0:19:14.040 --> 0:19:16.800
<v Speaker 1>just had everything working in twelve swinging strikes on his

0:19:16.880 --> 0:19:19.440
<v Speaker 1>slider alone and going up against the Orioles. And I

0:19:19.520 --> 0:19:22.040
<v Speaker 1>know most people just see the Orioles and they just think, well,

0:19:22.119 --> 0:19:25.359
<v Speaker 1>oh they're terrible, But the actually don't strike out all

0:19:25.400 --> 0:19:28.480
<v Speaker 1>that much against right handed pitching. Only one nine percent

0:19:28.560 --> 0:19:30.680
<v Speaker 1>strikeout right That's that's the middle of a pack. So

0:19:30.880 --> 0:19:32.920
<v Speaker 1>this isn't like your Orioles team of years past, where

0:19:32.960 --> 0:19:34.840
<v Speaker 1>like you know, they're in the top five and strikeout

0:19:34.920 --> 0:19:36.760
<v Speaker 1>right against right handed pitching. There in the middle of

0:19:36.840 --> 0:19:38.520
<v Speaker 1>the pack, and Shane people went out there and just

0:19:38.760 --> 0:19:42.400
<v Speaker 1>absolutely dominated. I really hope that this is a sign

0:19:42.440 --> 0:19:44.520
<v Speaker 1>of things to come. Chris, Yeah, and I think it is.

0:19:45.119 --> 0:19:48.159
<v Speaker 1>Um I the stuff is there. I think it goes

0:19:48.160 --> 0:19:50.280
<v Speaker 1>back to what we're saying at the beginning. He just

0:19:50.440 --> 0:19:54.160
<v Speaker 1>pitches too much in the zone. I mean, he still

0:19:54.480 --> 0:19:56.960
<v Speaker 1>doesn't walk anybody. And that's the thing, like I feel

0:19:56.960 --> 0:19:58.600
<v Speaker 1>like he needs to just be a little bit more,

0:19:59.240 --> 0:20:01.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, go for it with his stuff and really

0:20:02.400 --> 0:20:03.920
<v Speaker 1>win it, you know what I mean. Don't be worried

0:20:03.920 --> 0:20:07.280
<v Speaker 1>about always throwing strikes. He's got the stuff to be

0:20:07.359 --> 0:20:10.159
<v Speaker 1>an elite starter. He's still trying to harness it. And

0:20:10.240 --> 0:20:14.520
<v Speaker 1>right here he showed what he could do. Fifteen strikeouts, ridiculous,

0:20:14.760 --> 0:20:18.119
<v Speaker 1>no walks still again, I mean, and he's gonna do

0:20:18.200 --> 0:20:20.440
<v Speaker 1>this against a lot of you know, bad offensive teams,

0:20:20.480 --> 0:20:22.120
<v Speaker 1>even if they don't strike out. He's got that type

0:20:22.160 --> 0:20:25.520
<v Speaker 1>of stuff. So Whove has got Bieber, you know, don't

0:20:25.600 --> 0:20:28.000
<v Speaker 1>you don't have to worry anymore. And the fastball Velo

0:20:28.119 --> 0:20:29.720
<v Speaker 1>was up a little bit yesterday too. He was sitting

0:20:29.760 --> 0:20:32.760
<v Speaker 1>like ninety four. He was consistently hitting nine as well,

0:20:32.840 --> 0:20:35.000
<v Speaker 1>So fastball Vilo was up. I'm looking at the slider

0:20:35.080 --> 0:20:37.560
<v Speaker 1>velocity for the season, up about a mile per hour

0:20:37.720 --> 0:20:39.960
<v Speaker 1>as well, using that slider a little bit more this year.

0:20:40.520 --> 0:20:42.760
<v Speaker 1>So I think this is something that you could build off.

0:20:42.800 --> 0:20:45.000
<v Speaker 1>If you look at the underlying numbers, they're still really good.

0:20:45.400 --> 0:20:47.680
<v Speaker 1>They they have been. I mean, thirteen point seven percent

0:20:47.760 --> 0:20:51.000
<v Speaker 1>swinging strike rate, much higher than league average, his oh swing,

0:20:51.119 --> 0:20:53.920
<v Speaker 1>his chase rate is higher this year as well. I

0:20:53.960 --> 0:20:55.960
<v Speaker 1>would like to see him get more groundballs. I think

0:20:56.000 --> 0:20:58.120
<v Speaker 1>that's why he's been hurt a little bit by home runs,

0:20:58.200 --> 0:21:00.359
<v Speaker 1>that he's been giving up a few too many fly balls.

0:21:00.760 --> 0:21:03.440
<v Speaker 1>But overall three to two r A, three seven three

0:21:03.720 --> 0:21:05.560
<v Speaker 1>uh FI and in three four two x fits, so

0:21:06.280 --> 0:21:08.199
<v Speaker 1>he's right in that range. Everything kind of like right

0:21:08.240 --> 0:21:10.800
<v Speaker 1>in that you know, mid threes, three point to eight

0:21:10.880 --> 0:21:13.400
<v Speaker 1>sierra as well skill interactive v r A, so everything's

0:21:13.520 --> 0:21:15.960
<v Speaker 1>right there. So you're saying we should start Bieber for

0:21:16.040 --> 0:21:18.560
<v Speaker 1>one against at home against Tampa Bay this week, Yes,

0:21:19.040 --> 0:21:22.320
<v Speaker 1>in most senses I would. I didn't use him in

0:21:22.480 --> 0:21:24.359
<v Speaker 1>one of my home leagues just because I had so

0:21:24.480 --> 0:21:27.520
<v Speaker 1>many two star pitchers head Turnbull for like the Mets

0:21:28.000 --> 0:21:30.399
<v Speaker 1>and the Marlins, and I wanted to get him in

0:21:30.480 --> 0:21:32.680
<v Speaker 1>there and I just traded for Zach Wheeler. I was

0:21:32.720 --> 0:21:35.440
<v Speaker 1>telling you guys during the break, I traded Giancarlos Stanton

0:21:35.480 --> 0:21:37.760
<v Speaker 1>a way for Zach Wheeler, with the caveat that it's

0:21:37.800 --> 0:21:40.480
<v Speaker 1>keeper league in Zach Wheeler's twenty first round keepers. So

0:21:41.040 --> 0:21:43.160
<v Speaker 1>and then the one that I was most shaky about

0:21:43.240 --> 0:21:44.800
<v Speaker 1>is I have you Darvish in my lineup for a

0:21:44.840 --> 0:21:47.359
<v Speaker 1>two star week instead of shame. So I was like,

0:21:47.600 --> 0:21:50.359
<v Speaker 1>really on the fence with that one. Well, I was like, again,

0:21:50.560 --> 0:21:52.880
<v Speaker 1>it's you know, you Darvish coming off his best start

0:21:52.880 --> 0:21:56.359
<v Speaker 1>of the season, and if you don't use him in

0:21:56.400 --> 0:21:58.000
<v Speaker 1>a two star league, you shouldn't have him. When are

0:21:58.040 --> 0:22:00.720
<v Speaker 1>you gonna use him? He's going up against Philly tonight,

0:22:00.800 --> 0:22:03.440
<v Speaker 1>which I don't love. But his second start is against Cincinnati,

0:22:03.760 --> 0:22:05.879
<v Speaker 1>which is the team that he had the eleven strikeouts against.

0:22:05.960 --> 0:22:09.560
<v Speaker 1>So he's been pitching better, but he doesn't go deep

0:22:09.840 --> 0:22:12.520
<v Speaker 1>at all because he normally walks to many guys. That

0:22:12.640 --> 0:22:14.359
<v Speaker 1>last start out here, he didn't walk anybody. And I

0:22:14.359 --> 0:22:16.240
<v Speaker 1>remember you gave a bunch of great stats, Craig about

0:22:16.240 --> 0:22:19.399
<v Speaker 1>how he had all these three ball accounts, but he

0:22:19.400 --> 0:22:22.040
<v Speaker 1>didn't walk anybody on those three ball accounts. Obviously, and

0:22:22.640 --> 0:22:24.720
<v Speaker 1>he uses cutter more which lets a more strikeouts, so

0:22:25.440 --> 0:22:27.200
<v Speaker 1>hoping that he can build off that. Man, this this,

0:22:27.400 --> 0:22:29.200
<v Speaker 1>this might be the last go around. Like if you

0:22:29.280 --> 0:22:31.600
<v Speaker 1>Darvish gives me negative points in like a two start week,

0:22:32.119 --> 0:22:36.720
<v Speaker 1>I might cut him cut Yeah, old cut, Wow. I

0:22:36.800 --> 0:22:39.080
<v Speaker 1>don't know. He's so frustrating, man, I know, but he's

0:22:39.080 --> 0:22:41.920
<v Speaker 1>still got you know, the les Miami two starts to go.

0:22:42.040 --> 0:22:45.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I I cannot forgive you for that. It's unforgivable,

0:22:45.760 --> 0:22:48.399
<v Speaker 1>that is, but but it's forgivable when you know you're

0:22:48.400 --> 0:22:51.760
<v Speaker 1>have an eleven ks you know start and you're dominating

0:22:51.800 --> 0:22:55.320
<v Speaker 1>with no books. Unforgivable. We had you in the lineup

0:22:55.640 --> 0:22:58.760
<v Speaker 1>six walks against the Marlins. Unfot his bad. But that's

0:22:58.800 --> 0:23:00.159
<v Speaker 1>what I think. I think Darvish could tell in that

0:23:00.240 --> 0:23:03.120
<v Speaker 1>around pretty easily. I mean, I listen, he's got he's

0:23:03.119 --> 0:23:06.200
<v Speaker 1>got the stuff you know's going on in his head.

0:23:06.400 --> 0:23:09.000
<v Speaker 1>I think it's clubs. He just hasn't been the same picture.

0:23:09.040 --> 0:23:11.480
<v Speaker 1>It's weird and the walks are a big part of that.

0:23:11.640 --> 0:23:15.440
<v Speaker 1>So like, you know, he's got that upside where he

0:23:15.520 --> 0:23:18.040
<v Speaker 1>could give you an eleven K ten K start on

0:23:18.200 --> 0:23:21.480
<v Speaker 1>any given start and I just want that on my team,

0:23:21.560 --> 0:23:23.080
<v Speaker 1>even if I'm stashing it for a while and I'm

0:23:23.119 --> 0:23:25.680
<v Speaker 1>only pitching from two for two starts, that are two

0:23:25.720 --> 0:23:28.000
<v Speaker 1>good matchups, like I might hold them. It depends on

0:23:28.040 --> 0:23:30.040
<v Speaker 1>what out there too. You know, if there's someone in

0:23:30.080 --> 0:23:32.680
<v Speaker 1>the wave of wid that you really like, sure, but

0:23:32.840 --> 0:23:35.680
<v Speaker 1>like I would hold him for the most part, give

0:23:35.720 --> 0:23:38.719
<v Speaker 1>him a little bit longer release. Let me go to Boston, who,

0:23:38.800 --> 0:23:41.800
<v Speaker 1>of course playing right now against Toronto, but yesterday they

0:23:41.880 --> 0:23:44.400
<v Speaker 1>played against the Astros finally beat him four to three.

0:23:44.760 --> 0:23:47.840
<v Speaker 1>Chris sal attend strike outs, but he walked five guys

0:23:48.000 --> 0:23:52.160
<v Speaker 1>five and third three runs, allowed four hits. Ultimately Boston's

0:23:52.200 --> 0:23:55.879
<v Speaker 1>win wins and Marcus Walden, who's six and oh on

0:23:56.040 --> 0:23:58.119
<v Speaker 1>the year out of the bullpen from Boston. You got

0:23:58.200 --> 0:24:00.320
<v Speaker 1>picked up in your main event, Frank, I saw um

0:24:01.119 --> 0:24:04.760
<v Speaker 1>is the ear as one point three seven that Bar's

0:24:04.800 --> 0:24:08.320
<v Speaker 1>gonna hold. It was Brandon Workman getting the save all

0:24:08.400 --> 0:24:10.480
<v Speaker 1>three of those guys. Really, I think if you're you're

0:24:10.520 --> 0:24:12.679
<v Speaker 1>in like a safe post holds leagues or all they

0:24:12.840 --> 0:24:17.120
<v Speaker 1>just need like a reliever like Waldman. Uh Walden makes sense,

0:24:17.160 --> 0:24:20.280
<v Speaker 1>and then Workman gets to save here too. It seems

0:24:20.280 --> 0:24:22.040
<v Speaker 1>like they didn't want anything to do with Ryan Brazier,

0:24:22.080 --> 0:24:24.159
<v Speaker 1>who's kind of going through a rough patch right now.

0:24:24.320 --> 0:24:27.639
<v Speaker 1>But just really frustrating that Matt Barnes again using the

0:24:27.800 --> 0:24:31.040
<v Speaker 1>eighth ending, like Brandon Workman for most of the season

0:24:31.119 --> 0:24:32.680
<v Speaker 1>had been the setup guy. He who had been the

0:24:32.720 --> 0:24:35.000
<v Speaker 1>guy who's pitching the seventh, eighth enning, and then they

0:24:35.080 --> 0:24:37.840
<v Speaker 1>still go with Matt Barnes here in the eighth instead

0:24:37.840 --> 0:24:40.240
<v Speaker 1>of using him as a closer. Um, I mean I

0:24:40.280 --> 0:24:41.760
<v Speaker 1>would have to go back and see, like maybe he

0:24:41.880 --> 0:24:45.040
<v Speaker 1>faced tougher the tougher hitters in the eighth inning. I

0:24:45.080 --> 0:24:48.760
<v Speaker 1>mean he faced Matt Barnes face Korea Gerriel and Tyler White,

0:24:49.280 --> 0:24:53.720
<v Speaker 1>and then Workman got Freenos, Reddick, Mariis Nick and Tony Camp.

0:24:53.840 --> 0:24:57.520
<v Speaker 1>So they probably wanted Matt Barns to face the tougher

0:24:57.560 --> 0:24:59.000
<v Speaker 1>part of the order, and that's why he's using the

0:24:59.040 --> 0:25:01.760
<v Speaker 1>eighth inning. Just the Boston bullpen has just been one

0:25:01.760 --> 0:25:03.919
<v Speaker 1>of the most frustrating all Sea. Well, that's the thing

0:25:04.200 --> 0:25:06.720
<v Speaker 1>I was gonna ask you. Of all the teams in

0:25:06.760 --> 0:25:08.600
<v Speaker 1>the league, I feel like a lot of teams are

0:25:08.680 --> 0:25:12.520
<v Speaker 1>like this now, though like for instance, Jose Alvarado, the

0:25:12.600 --> 0:25:15.080
<v Speaker 1>guy has been lights out all season, except for recently

0:25:15.119 --> 0:25:17.639
<v Speaker 1>against the Yankees he got tattooed for three runs. But

0:25:18.080 --> 0:25:20.159
<v Speaker 1>other than that, the guy has been amazing, and he

0:25:20.280 --> 0:25:23.120
<v Speaker 1>hasn't been getting saves until recently. Like he was used

0:25:23.119 --> 0:25:25.080
<v Speaker 1>as a as a setup for the most part. I know,

0:25:25.320 --> 0:25:27.359
<v Speaker 1>you know he's left and everything like that, but like

0:25:27.520 --> 0:25:30.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, he used to be the closers, the closer.

0:25:30.480 --> 0:25:32.960
<v Speaker 1>That's it. You know, I'm very well you are clo

0:25:35.760 --> 0:25:38.240
<v Speaker 1>there's no closer by committee. If you have a dominant

0:25:38.280 --> 0:25:40.840
<v Speaker 1>closer like Alvarado could be, and the way Matt Barnes

0:25:40.920 --> 0:25:43.520
<v Speaker 1>is pitching, should be the closer, the go to closer

0:25:43.560 --> 0:25:45.399
<v Speaker 1>every time, unless he's pitched two or three games in

0:25:45.440 --> 0:25:47.120
<v Speaker 1>a row and you want to arrest him whatever. Fine,

0:25:47.400 --> 0:25:50.639
<v Speaker 1>But like there's no consistency with a lot of these

0:25:50.680 --> 0:25:52.560
<v Speaker 1>pictures that we talked about this when I got in

0:25:52.600 --> 0:25:55.480
<v Speaker 1>the fight with Frank Well while back. Yeah, I remember,

0:25:55.640 --> 0:25:57.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that's that's why too many teams are doing this.

0:25:58.600 --> 0:26:00.960
<v Speaker 1>That's because it's smart. Do you have your invest reliever

0:26:01.119 --> 0:26:04.200
<v Speaker 1>face the best players. It's very simptoms, but it kills.

0:26:04.440 --> 0:26:06.560
<v Speaker 1>It kills fantasy. Not smart for us, of course, but

0:26:06.600 --> 0:26:08.840
<v Speaker 1>they don't give a crap about us. How would you

0:26:08.920 --> 0:26:12.400
<v Speaker 1>have felt closer and then the next day you pitched

0:26:12.440 --> 0:26:14.200
<v Speaker 1>the sixth and be a pitches six inning against the

0:26:14.240 --> 0:26:17.760
<v Speaker 1>best hitters, the bases loaded. How would I feel? I

0:26:17.760 --> 0:26:20.359
<v Speaker 1>would be like, why are we doing this? The bases

0:26:20.400 --> 0:26:22.480
<v Speaker 1>are loaded, You're facing the best players the other team.

0:26:22.480 --> 0:26:23.680
<v Speaker 1>You would say, I'm the closing I don't want to

0:26:23.680 --> 0:26:29.320
<v Speaker 1>pitch right now? Yeah, cut immediately, No, But that's why

0:26:29.680 --> 0:26:31.920
<v Speaker 1>then fantasy needs to be safe pass hold. If this

0:26:32.000 --> 0:26:35.359
<v Speaker 1>is the director has to be no way around it.

0:26:35.520 --> 0:26:37.400
<v Speaker 1>One name that you didn't mention that they didn't pitch

0:26:37.480 --> 0:26:39.600
<v Speaker 1>yesterday for Boston that was involved in the same class

0:26:39.600 --> 0:26:42.800
<v Speaker 1>hold was Ryan Brasier, who has not gone ay save

0:26:42.960 --> 0:26:46.080
<v Speaker 1>or holding each of his last three appearances for Boston.

0:26:46.080 --> 0:26:47.639
<v Speaker 1>He's only allowed one running that time with it in

0:26:47.680 --> 0:26:52.240
<v Speaker 1>base runners on base quite a bit? Should hands cut

0:26:52.320 --> 0:26:55.720
<v Speaker 1>bait with Ryan Brasier? Has Brandon Workman surpassed him as

0:26:55.760 --> 0:26:58.480
<v Speaker 1>Marcus Walden sur passed him as Matt Matt Barnes is

0:26:58.880 --> 0:27:01.800
<v Speaker 1>kind of compliment to him. She fantish cut Ryan Brasier.

0:27:02.680 --> 0:27:04.520
<v Speaker 1>I think we have to be a little bit more

0:27:04.560 --> 0:27:07.480
<v Speaker 1>patient here, Greg, especially in Rhoto leagues, because would it

0:27:07.520 --> 0:27:09.040
<v Speaker 1>surprised you if he came out this week and got

0:27:09.119 --> 0:27:12.000
<v Speaker 1>like two or three saves, like it wouldn't surprise me personally.

0:27:12.040 --> 0:27:14.240
<v Speaker 1>And I know he hasn't pitched well recently, and you

0:27:14.320 --> 0:27:15.760
<v Speaker 1>know he's got a three three eight e r A.

0:27:15.880 --> 0:27:17.880
<v Speaker 1>His underlying members not good. He's got a five point

0:27:17.920 --> 0:27:20.280
<v Speaker 1>four seven XFIT. I was actually searching his name on

0:27:20.320 --> 0:27:22.800
<v Speaker 1>Twitter yesterday to see if they said before the game

0:27:22.840 --> 0:27:24.800
<v Speaker 1>that he was unavailable or anything, and I saw a

0:27:24.880 --> 0:27:26.920
<v Speaker 1>lot of Red Sox fans actually tweeting like, please do

0:27:27.000 --> 0:27:29.560
<v Speaker 1>not bring in Ryan Brasier. So that tells you the

0:27:29.680 --> 0:27:32.399
<v Speaker 1>level of trust that they have in Ryan Brasier right now.

0:27:32.640 --> 0:27:35.520
<v Speaker 1>And I think you're starting to see that um in

0:27:35.840 --> 0:27:38.480
<v Speaker 1>Alex Cora as well and the Red Sox overall. So

0:27:39.280 --> 0:27:41.800
<v Speaker 1>in rhoto leagues where saves are so hard to come by,

0:27:42.320 --> 0:27:44.880
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't cut bait on him yet. If you're playing

0:27:44.960 --> 0:27:46.879
<v Speaker 1>like head to head points league and you just need

0:27:46.920 --> 0:27:49.880
<v Speaker 1>two relievers, he probably wouldn't have been out my roster

0:27:49.920 --> 0:27:52.119
<v Speaker 1>fight the past couple of weeks anyway. So in the

0:27:52.200 --> 0:27:54.920
<v Speaker 1>league like that, all right, But anywhere where it saves

0:27:54.920 --> 0:27:57.399
<v Speaker 1>as a category head to head categories or rhodo I

0:27:57.400 --> 0:27:59.520
<v Speaker 1>would probably hold him for the next week or two,

0:27:59.760 --> 0:28:01.680
<v Speaker 1>just if he gets any more safe opportunities, and if

0:28:01.680 --> 0:28:03.560
<v Speaker 1>it turns out that he's out of the pecking rner

0:28:03.640 --> 0:28:05.680
<v Speaker 1>now and it's it's work man and it's Matt Barnes,

0:28:05.720 --> 0:28:07.240
<v Speaker 1>and I think you're all right to drop, but I

0:28:07.280 --> 0:28:09.600
<v Speaker 1>would still hold on to him for now. Greg Okay,

0:28:09.720 --> 0:28:13.760
<v Speaker 1>holding all onto Ryan Brazier just for now, says For example,

0:28:13.880 --> 0:28:17.520
<v Speaker 1>in the game yesterday, we we kind of all are

0:28:17.600 --> 0:28:21.159
<v Speaker 1>all on this. Kyle Tucker, You're on Alvarez watches Albres.

0:28:21.160 --> 0:28:22.840
<v Speaker 1>It is another home run yesterday, but one for three

0:28:22.840 --> 0:28:27.200
<v Speaker 1>has everyone down. Um, yeah, we're kind of just waiting.

0:28:27.240 --> 0:28:28.440
<v Speaker 1>We best in a nice day. He was to be

0:28:28.600 --> 0:28:31.320
<v Speaker 1>for four or three runs scored O Javis let off yesterday.

0:28:31.400 --> 0:28:33.639
<v Speaker 1>That was cool. Uh two be four was Andrew Brogers

0:28:33.680 --> 0:28:37.080
<v Speaker 1>being two be four as as well, Springer getting hurt

0:28:37.800 --> 0:28:40.080
<v Speaker 1>for three. That's right over three had three strikeouts that

0:28:40.240 --> 0:28:44.520
<v Speaker 1>pulled the lower back injury yesterday. Is that the Tucker opportunity? Yeah,

0:28:44.560 --> 0:28:46.120
<v Speaker 1>that's what we were just talking about in the first hour,

0:28:46.240 --> 0:28:49.880
<v Speaker 1>asking he goes on the I l I think the

0:28:49.960 --> 0:28:52.080
<v Speaker 1>answer is yes. I think it would be Tucker too.

0:28:52.160 --> 0:28:54.360
<v Speaker 1>And I tweeted that out yesterday venture and I got

0:28:54.400 --> 0:28:56.320
<v Speaker 1>some backlash, everyone saying, well, it has to be your

0:28:56.360 --> 0:28:59.640
<v Speaker 1>Don Alvarez. He's not a good outfielder. He've been using

0:28:59.720 --> 0:29:01.480
<v Speaker 1>him at first base. He projects more as like a

0:29:01.520 --> 0:29:05.320
<v Speaker 1>first baseman or a designated hitter, maybe a corner outfielder.

0:29:05.440 --> 0:29:08.440
<v Speaker 1>But I think that the Astros care a little bit

0:29:08.480 --> 0:29:11.280
<v Speaker 1>more about defense than other teams have showed, like you know,

0:29:11.320 --> 0:29:14.160
<v Speaker 1>the Brewers for example, that you know they'll sacrifice defense

0:29:14.320 --> 0:29:17.360
<v Speaker 1>in order to get more offense in their lineup. But like,

0:29:17.480 --> 0:29:20.000
<v Speaker 1>Josh Reddick isn't going anywhere. This is like he's hitting

0:29:20.040 --> 0:29:22.800
<v Speaker 1>three thirty three within eight SIPs. He had two more

0:29:22.880 --> 0:29:26.320
<v Speaker 1>hits yesterday. Like as much as we want your Don Alvarez,

0:29:27.480 --> 0:29:29.520
<v Speaker 1>Josh Reddick is not going anywhere. So that's why, like

0:29:29.680 --> 0:29:32.400
<v Speaker 1>we kind of have this issue with all right, well

0:29:32.600 --> 0:29:35.160
<v Speaker 1>we want Kyle Tucker too. Is just there's not enough spots,

0:29:35.240 --> 0:29:37.800
<v Speaker 1>and you know, they haven't got great production at the

0:29:37.840 --> 0:29:40.840
<v Speaker 1>first basis here with Tyler White and using Ulie Guriel there.

0:29:41.400 --> 0:29:43.400
<v Speaker 1>So I think that would be the opening for Alvarez,

0:29:43.520 --> 0:29:45.560
<v Speaker 1>and I think it shows because they've been using him

0:29:45.560 --> 0:29:47.600
<v Speaker 1>at first base in the minors that that's kind of

0:29:47.640 --> 0:29:49.640
<v Speaker 1>their train of their their train of thought right now

0:29:49.720 --> 0:29:52.360
<v Speaker 1>as well. But like Josh Reddick isn't going anywhere venture

0:29:52.720 --> 0:29:55.480
<v Speaker 1>he's performing, so why would he lose his job just

0:29:55.520 --> 0:29:58.280
<v Speaker 1>doesn't make sense. And he's a veteran that could be

0:29:58.360 --> 0:30:00.560
<v Speaker 1>big in the playoffs come time. Listen, this is the

0:30:00.600 --> 0:30:04.640
<v Speaker 1>Houston Nationals, the thirty one and sixteen. Uh, they're winning games.

0:30:04.680 --> 0:30:06.160
<v Speaker 1>They're one of the best teams in baseball, if not

0:30:06.280 --> 0:30:09.840
<v Speaker 1>the best. And why would they rush something that they

0:30:09.880 --> 0:30:11.520
<v Speaker 1>don't have to? You know what I mean, Let the

0:30:11.600 --> 0:30:14.480
<v Speaker 1>kid develop, let him get reps at first. You know,

0:30:14.680 --> 0:30:16.520
<v Speaker 1>us as fantasy on us, we want these young guys

0:30:16.560 --> 0:30:17.680
<v Speaker 1>coming up and we want to grab him on a

0:30:17.720 --> 0:30:19.640
<v Speaker 1>team as soon as possible. But it's just not the

0:30:19.680 --> 0:30:21.680
<v Speaker 1>way baseball works were talking about. This is just with

0:30:21.760 --> 0:30:24.800
<v Speaker 1>the relievers too, So I mean, you gotta wait, you

0:30:24.840 --> 0:30:27.760
<v Speaker 1>gotta wait. I mean, Tucker, though, once it does happen,

0:30:27.760 --> 0:30:29.680
<v Speaker 1>you want to be on top of it quick, because

0:30:29.680 --> 0:30:31.920
<v Speaker 1>it could happen. I would start stashing him now. Yeah.

0:30:32.320 --> 0:30:34.400
<v Speaker 1>Oh and and you know something else I would throw

0:30:34.440 --> 0:30:37.400
<v Speaker 1>out there too, right was I wrote about this on

0:30:37.480 --> 0:30:41.640
<v Speaker 1>my Patrens just earlier today. I said um stasist Mitch Keller.

0:30:41.720 --> 0:30:45.400
<v Speaker 1>Now because there was a tweet yesterday from MLB Pipeline

0:30:45.440 --> 0:30:49.840
<v Speaker 1>that said that he got scratched from his scheduled start

0:30:50.320 --> 0:30:53.840
<v Speaker 1>UM and that the starter for the Pirates Wednesday is

0:30:53.920 --> 0:30:56.400
<v Speaker 1>TBD to be determined. And I brought this up last

0:30:56.400 --> 0:30:58.560
<v Speaker 1>week when Trevor Williams got hurt and they've obviously had

0:30:58.560 --> 0:31:01.440
<v Speaker 1>the injuries to Jameson I own when Archer just came back.

0:31:01.520 --> 0:31:04.400
<v Speaker 1>But they're running out of bodies, Greg, So I would say,

0:31:04.480 --> 0:31:07.360
<v Speaker 1>if you're in need of pitching in deeper leagues, think

0:31:07.440 --> 0:31:11.360
<v Speaker 1>now it's the time to stash miss Keller, stashing him anywhere. Ah,

0:31:11.960 --> 0:31:16.520
<v Speaker 1>they like against you. I mean just I think it's um.

0:31:17.160 --> 0:31:18.520
<v Speaker 1>I think it's you know, you kind of get ahead

0:31:18.520 --> 0:31:20.800
<v Speaker 1>of the pack before for other before he comes out.

0:31:21.120 --> 0:31:22.520
<v Speaker 1>You gotta spend all this, fab I think now it's

0:31:22.560 --> 0:31:24.960
<v Speaker 1>probably the time. I don't disagree. I think this is

0:31:25.000 --> 0:31:26.920
<v Speaker 1>the move before they potentially announced them as a star.

0:31:27.000 --> 0:31:30.080
<v Speaker 1>To you great point, Frankie looked into it. UH scratches

0:31:30.200 --> 0:31:33.560
<v Speaker 1>last start tv D on Wednesday for UH in Pittsburgh.

0:31:34.120 --> 0:31:36.040
<v Speaker 1>I agree with you, Frank, I think it's worth it. Yeah,

0:31:36.080 --> 0:31:39.400
<v Speaker 1>I still me personally, I think that he needs more seasoning.

0:31:40.040 --> 0:31:41.800
<v Speaker 1>I look at his minor league numbers and he's got

0:31:41.840 --> 0:31:43.920
<v Speaker 1>like a three seven e r A and his whip

0:31:44.040 --> 0:31:46.680
<v Speaker 1>is like one point five because he still struggles with walks.

0:31:46.720 --> 0:31:49.400
<v Speaker 1>So I think he needs more seasoning. But there's no

0:31:49.520 --> 0:31:51.920
<v Speaker 1>denying that the stuff is there, and he is their

0:31:52.000 --> 0:31:54.720
<v Speaker 1>top prospect. He's not just the top pitching project. He's

0:31:54.720 --> 0:31:58.600
<v Speaker 1>their top prospect overall in the Pirates organization and is

0:31:58.600 --> 0:32:00.360
<v Speaker 1>going to be some hype around him. Right, he's too

0:32:00.560 --> 0:32:02.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, he's twenty three years old. It's you know,

0:32:02.360 --> 0:32:04.480
<v Speaker 1>it's about time that he comes up soon, you know

0:32:04.560 --> 0:32:08.080
<v Speaker 1>what I mean? And you're right too. He's to seventy

0:32:08.120 --> 0:32:10.320
<v Speaker 1>three bating average against. He has a one five whip,

0:32:10.480 --> 0:32:12.520
<v Speaker 1>so he's given up hits, end walks. He's got the

0:32:12.600 --> 0:32:15.160
<v Speaker 1>k's up. But you know, the talents there. I guess

0:32:15.400 --> 0:32:17.080
<v Speaker 1>he should be seasoned a little more. But you're right,

0:32:17.120 --> 0:32:20.320
<v Speaker 1>this is someone you gotta stash, especially keep his league.

0:32:20.320 --> 0:32:23.040
<v Speaker 1>He should already be owned a while ago. Yeah, no doubt,

0:32:23.040 --> 0:32:24.960
<v Speaker 1>no doubt about it. That's Keller. We'll see if he

0:32:25.000 --> 0:32:28.040
<v Speaker 1>does get a call for Pittsburgh later this week. Now

0:32:28.160 --> 0:32:29.920
<v Speaker 1>is the time to jump on it, so you don't

0:32:29.960 --> 0:32:31.600
<v Speaker 1>have to spend all that fab to go ahead and

0:32:31.600 --> 0:32:34.200
<v Speaker 1>get him. Yesterday for Pittsburgh they defeated San Diego h

0:32:34.320 --> 0:32:38.040
<v Speaker 1>six to four. Joe must Grove when six and the third,

0:32:38.120 --> 0:32:40.480
<v Speaker 1>four hits, four runs, three or and he struck out

0:32:40.600 --> 0:32:43.200
<v Speaker 1>four cal Kwandro got bothered in his five minutes, only

0:32:43.240 --> 0:32:45.480
<v Speaker 1>five runs, eight hits, only walked too, but also only

0:32:45.560 --> 0:32:48.040
<v Speaker 1>struck out s Felie bag Basket struck out the side

0:32:48.400 --> 0:32:51.760
<v Speaker 1>for his thirteenth safe Frankie Yeah, Tee must Grove look

0:32:51.920 --> 0:32:54.480
<v Speaker 1>bounce back performances here. You needed to see this from

0:32:54.560 --> 0:32:57.200
<v Speaker 1>him based on the way that things have been going

0:32:57.280 --> 0:33:00.440
<v Speaker 1>for him recently. Is the one big blow against him

0:33:00.520 --> 0:33:03.000
<v Speaker 1>was a three run homer off of the bat of

0:33:03.120 --> 0:33:05.760
<v Speaker 1>Hunter Renfro that he just left a hanging slider up

0:33:05.800 --> 0:33:09.080
<v Speaker 1>in the zone. But you know, since that eight earned

0:33:09.120 --> 0:33:11.920
<v Speaker 1>run performance where he just got actually blown up against

0:33:11.960 --> 0:33:13.880
<v Speaker 1>the Cardinals and people were asking it should be dropped,

0:33:13.920 --> 0:33:17.160
<v Speaker 1>Joe must Grove, He's gone thirteen and one third ending

0:33:17.240 --> 0:33:20.680
<v Speaker 1>pitch and has only allowed three earned runs total during

0:33:20.760 --> 0:33:23.000
<v Speaker 1>that span, so and only three walks. That's obviously a

0:33:23.040 --> 0:33:25.560
<v Speaker 1>big key for him. Uh and that start against the Cardinals.

0:33:25.640 --> 0:33:28.360
<v Speaker 1>He was just super wild. He had he had five walks.

0:33:28.840 --> 0:33:31.480
<v Speaker 1>That was a career high for him. So it's good

0:33:31.520 --> 0:33:33.800
<v Speaker 1>to see that he bounces back these past two starts,

0:33:33.880 --> 0:33:36.520
<v Speaker 1>not walking many guys, not getting a ton of strikeouts either.

0:33:36.680 --> 0:33:39.400
<v Speaker 1>But I don't think we really expect all the strikeouts

0:33:39.400 --> 0:33:41.520
<v Speaker 1>from him anyway. That's not gonna happen anyway. Yeah, this

0:33:41.680 --> 0:33:44.760
<v Speaker 1>start looks like a typical Joe Musgrove start. Quality start

0:33:45.720 --> 0:33:47.360
<v Speaker 1>gives you a quality start. He's not gonna a ton

0:33:47.400 --> 0:33:49.960
<v Speaker 1>of case. He'll have a walk or two and you

0:33:50.000 --> 0:33:51.360
<v Speaker 1>know he'll give up a couple of runs. That's what

0:33:51.400 --> 0:33:53.680
<v Speaker 1>he does. Uh, you know when he's on and you

0:33:53.760 --> 0:33:56.760
<v Speaker 1>want that consistency though, that's the thing. Um. And just

0:33:56.880 --> 0:33:59.160
<v Speaker 1>to say, don't look now the Pirates of twenty four

0:33:59.160 --> 0:34:02.640
<v Speaker 1>and twenty Josh Bell ferm VP. That's what I'm gonna say.

0:34:03.840 --> 0:34:05.680
<v Speaker 1>He's like the four I mean, he's the top five

0:34:05.800 --> 0:34:09.160
<v Speaker 1>hitter in Basil right now. I laughed, but I can

0:34:09.960 --> 0:34:13.759
<v Speaker 1>he got four b P baseball in RBIs. He got

0:34:13.800 --> 0:34:17.399
<v Speaker 1>fourteen homers, those forty four ribs. I was with someone

0:34:17.440 --> 0:34:19.840
<v Speaker 1>on Saturday who say we're thirty runs scored. I was

0:34:19.880 --> 0:34:21.600
<v Speaker 1>with someone on Saturday and a bad team. They're not

0:34:21.640 --> 0:34:25.839
<v Speaker 1>really a good Josh Bell fourteen home runs and I'm like, yeah, dude,

0:34:25.840 --> 0:34:27.439
<v Speaker 1>I mean this guy, it's a home run every day

0:34:27.680 --> 0:34:31.000
<v Speaker 1>and like long shots like bomb. Yeah, he's hitting bombs. So,

0:34:31.239 --> 0:34:33.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, shout shout out to Josh Bell who who

0:34:33.640 --> 0:34:36.640
<v Speaker 1>made that made that adjustment he is. He's tied with

0:34:36.719 --> 0:34:39.239
<v Speaker 1>Cody Boninger for the league leading RBIs with forty four.

0:34:39.560 --> 0:34:41.400
<v Speaker 1>He made that adjustment where he needed to, you know,

0:34:41.840 --> 0:34:43.560
<v Speaker 1>raise his long hang a little bit more, hit more

0:34:43.640 --> 0:34:46.359
<v Speaker 1>line drives, hit more home runs, and god, it's paying off.

0:34:46.400 --> 0:34:48.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean, this is a big dude. He's a strong dude.

0:34:48.719 --> 0:34:51.520
<v Speaker 1>So we've been begging him to do this for for

0:34:51.800 --> 0:34:54.520
<v Speaker 1>a couple of years now, and man, he's finally doing

0:34:54.560 --> 0:34:57.759
<v Speaker 1>it and doing it quite successfully. I wonder what. You

0:34:57.800 --> 0:34:59.120
<v Speaker 1>don't have to look it up now, but like at

0:34:59.200 --> 0:35:01.320
<v Speaker 1>some point I want to look up, Uh what the

0:35:01.440 --> 0:35:03.560
<v Speaker 1>change in his launch angle approaches and everything like that.

0:35:04.000 --> 0:35:06.040
<v Speaker 1>I spoke about this a little bit last week. It's

0:35:06.080 --> 0:35:09.440
<v Speaker 1>not it's not massive. It's not a massive change. But

0:35:10.120 --> 0:35:13.760
<v Speaker 1>last year he was nine point to average launch angle.

0:35:14.040 --> 0:35:17.800
<v Speaker 1>This year it's ten point six. So it's not massive.

0:35:17.880 --> 0:35:20.359
<v Speaker 1>But look at the average egg lostity. I mean he's

0:35:20.360 --> 0:35:22.319
<v Speaker 1>just seeing the ball better this year. I mean it's must.

0:35:22.440 --> 0:35:24.040
<v Speaker 1>It must look like a beach ball form when it's

0:35:24.080 --> 0:35:27.200
<v Speaker 1>coming at the plate because last year ninety average eggs

0:35:27.239 --> 0:35:30.040
<v Speaker 1>of velocity, which was already pretty good. This year ninety

0:35:30.200 --> 0:35:37.560
<v Speaker 1>five point eight eight that is the best in baseball boom.

0:35:37.880 --> 0:35:43.120
<v Speaker 1>That is the percentile Josh Bell average ex loss. When

0:35:43.120 --> 0:35:46.799
<v Speaker 1>do we come back the BFF best pick of the night,

0:35:47.520 --> 0:35:49.600
<v Speaker 1>Frank and I will have that for you and lets

0:35:49.600 --> 0:35:55.799
<v Speaker 1>you know why you should put your money next, From

0:35:55.800 --> 0:35:58.279
<v Speaker 1>the NFL to the NBA. Daily Rhoda dot Com is

0:35:58.320 --> 0:36:00.759
<v Speaker 1>the place to win millions in daily fantasy. You can

0:36:00.760 --> 0:36:03.520
<v Speaker 1>get the best DFS NFL coverage all season long for

0:36:03.600 --> 0:36:07.800
<v Speaker 1>a price of or dominate the entire Daily Fantasy Sports

0:36:07.840 --> 0:36:11.160
<v Speaker 1>realm with the Elite package a month. If you use

0:36:11.239 --> 0:36:13.399
<v Speaker 1>the promo code f n t s Y, you get

0:36:13.480 --> 0:36:16.279
<v Speaker 1>ten percent off your Daily Rodo package. Go to Daily

0:36:16.320 --> 0:36:19.400
<v Speaker 1>Rodo dot com, pick your NFL Elite Package, enter promo

0:36:19.480 --> 0:36:21.440
<v Speaker 1>code f n T s Y and you'll be on

0:36:21.520 --> 0:36:41.600
<v Speaker 1>your way to becoming the next Daily Rhodo millionaire. Back

0:36:41.719 --> 0:36:46.000
<v Speaker 1>with you here on the FFS, it's Frank Stample, Greg

0:36:46.160 --> 0:36:49.760
<v Speaker 1>Sauce me here the BFS pick of the night around

0:36:49.800 --> 0:36:51.920
<v Speaker 1>the MLB we go. It's sorter sleep give it that

0:36:52.360 --> 0:36:55.640
<v Speaker 1>it's a Monday night. But Frankie, there's a clear answer

0:36:55.920 --> 0:36:58.120
<v Speaker 1>to the best pick of the night. And I don't

0:36:58.160 --> 0:37:00.120
<v Speaker 1>know that you have it. You might and I to

0:37:00.160 --> 0:37:01.480
<v Speaker 1>me there, to me, there's a clear answer. Where are

0:37:01.480 --> 0:37:04.359
<v Speaker 1>you going first tonight? Yeah, So I'm looking at my guy,

0:37:04.560 --> 0:37:07.360
<v Speaker 1>Mike Sarroka and the Atlanta Braves going up against the

0:37:07.560 --> 0:37:10.960
<v Speaker 1>San Francisco Giants tonight. I understand that the game is

0:37:11.040 --> 0:37:13.839
<v Speaker 1>in San Francisco, it's in Oracle Park. The Braves are

0:37:13.840 --> 0:37:16.239
<v Speaker 1>on the road here, But Mike Sarroca, Greg would a

0:37:16.360 --> 0:37:18.960
<v Speaker 1>zero point nine eight e r A on the season,

0:37:19.000 --> 0:37:21.319
<v Speaker 1>and going up against the San Francisco Giants, a team

0:37:21.360 --> 0:37:23.920
<v Speaker 1>that frankly does not have one of the stronger lineups

0:37:23.960 --> 0:37:25.960
<v Speaker 1>in the league, and going up against Andrew Suarrez, who

0:37:26.040 --> 0:37:28.800
<v Speaker 1>was making his first start. You're getting the Braves tonight

0:37:28.920 --> 0:37:31.439
<v Speaker 1>at minus one thirty eight. To me, it's no brainer. Yeah,

0:37:31.480 --> 0:37:33.200
<v Speaker 1>So I really like the Raves tonight for all the

0:37:33.200 --> 0:37:36.320
<v Speaker 1>reasons to mention Siroca, uh, given what he's done this seasons,

0:37:36.440 --> 0:37:38.440
<v Speaker 1>is getting called up Suars making his first start of

0:37:38.719 --> 0:37:40.880
<v Speaker 1>the season. The fact it's only minus one thirty eight,

0:37:40.960 --> 0:37:42.719
<v Speaker 1>I get it, it's in oracle, but then it's a

0:37:42.719 --> 0:37:45.640
<v Speaker 1>great number. I love Sarroca tonight, but I don't know

0:37:45.880 --> 0:37:48.040
<v Speaker 1>that that's the answer. I know you had one other

0:37:48.160 --> 0:37:50.279
<v Speaker 1>bet that you liked. What is it? It is the

0:37:50.360 --> 0:37:55.160
<v Speaker 1>Minnesota Twins at plus one. You're getting plus money going

0:37:55.280 --> 0:37:57.560
<v Speaker 1>up against the Los Angeles Angels. They're going with the

0:37:57.680 --> 0:38:00.279
<v Speaker 1>opener tonight. Felix Painia will be the one that follow them,

0:38:00.440 --> 0:38:03.879
<v Speaker 1>and he has pitched well this season, so has Jake Odoreesy.

0:38:04.320 --> 0:38:07.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm just gonna side with the Minnesota Twins here because

0:38:07.080 --> 0:38:09.759
<v Speaker 1>their offense has just been phenomenal recently. Over the past

0:38:09.800 --> 0:38:12.239
<v Speaker 1>week They've done something like score fifty six runs. They

0:38:12.280 --> 0:38:14.960
<v Speaker 1>had an eighteen run game over the weekend. Greg so

0:38:15.040 --> 0:38:17.560
<v Speaker 1>Odorezi has pitched well, their lineup is hot, and you're

0:38:17.560 --> 0:38:19.840
<v Speaker 1>getting them at plus money. I like the Twins to

0:38:19.880 --> 0:38:21.560
<v Speaker 1>win this game tonight plus one A wait. So that's

0:38:21.600 --> 0:38:23.680
<v Speaker 1>why you're right because plus one A wait, and you're like, what,

0:38:24.080 --> 0:38:26.480
<v Speaker 1>the Twins are one of the hottest teams in baseball

0:38:26.520 --> 0:38:27.759
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to their line up. Why are you

0:38:27.760 --> 0:38:30.040
<v Speaker 1>getting them a plus money like an Angels team that's

0:38:30.120 --> 0:38:32.680
<v Speaker 1>won't just not. I don't know. That's why I like

0:38:32.800 --> 0:38:34.640
<v Speaker 1>the Twins. That's why I say you're getting closer. But

0:38:34.719 --> 0:38:37.360
<v Speaker 1>the bet that you need to make is the total

0:38:37.440 --> 0:38:39.520
<v Speaker 1>in this game. So there's totals nine if you like.

0:38:39.800 --> 0:38:42.680
<v Speaker 1>Look at what j j Oderesi has done over his

0:38:42.840 --> 0:38:46.640
<v Speaker 1>last I don't know, entire season. He hasn't allowed more

0:38:46.840 --> 0:38:50.839
<v Speaker 1>than four runs ever, a lot of four runs one time,

0:38:51.320 --> 0:38:55.120
<v Speaker 1>and in his last five starts he hasn't allowed more

0:38:55.200 --> 0:38:58.560
<v Speaker 1>than three three consecutive starts where you're lot none none.

0:38:59.000 --> 0:39:00.360
<v Speaker 1>So then you go to the Angels like, all right,

0:39:00.400 --> 0:39:04.480
<v Speaker 1>what is Felix Paina done. So Felix Paino again has

0:39:04.600 --> 0:39:07.800
<v Speaker 1>only allowed four runs or more one time, and that

0:39:07.920 --> 0:39:10.360
<v Speaker 1>was way back in his first start of this season

0:39:10.719 --> 0:39:12.840
<v Speaker 1>in March. We don't care that he's not the starter.

0:39:13.080 --> 0:39:14.960
<v Speaker 1>He isn't open, that's fine. He's petching the majority of

0:39:14.960 --> 0:39:17.719
<v Speaker 1>the innings. He doesn't allow more than three runs either.

0:39:17.880 --> 0:39:19.799
<v Speaker 1>You can bind three plus three and that's the most

0:39:19.960 --> 0:39:23.080
<v Speaker 1>you got six the totals nine. You have plenty of

0:39:23.280 --> 0:39:27.160
<v Speaker 1>room for error here. To me, it's easy get the

0:39:27.440 --> 0:39:31.560
<v Speaker 1>under tonight between the twins and the Angels. Good back.

0:39:32.640 --> 0:39:34.000
<v Speaker 1>So there we go. We both like the Twins and

0:39:34.040 --> 0:39:36.480
<v Speaker 1>the Angels. We will like the Twins. We both like

0:39:36.560 --> 0:39:39.040
<v Speaker 1>the under If you like another, start the Braves in Saroka.

0:39:39.280 --> 0:39:40.920
<v Speaker 1>That's the way to go. We f play the day.

0:39:40.920 --> 0:39:43.360
<v Speaker 1>We keep track of it each and every day. So

0:39:43.719 --> 0:39:47.440
<v Speaker 1>good luck to you tonight. Let's get back into what

0:39:47.600 --> 0:39:50.800
<v Speaker 1>we were going over before the break. We tain to

0:39:50.840 --> 0:39:52.680
<v Speaker 1>look at what happened this weekend, and we mentioned Franks

0:39:52.719 --> 0:39:55.319
<v Speaker 1>just a moment ago that the Minnesota Twins were one

0:39:55.360 --> 0:39:58.600
<v Speaker 1>of the hottest teams in baseball with that line what

0:39:58.800 --> 0:40:01.400
<v Speaker 1>they're doing, and yes, straight he did fall to Seattle

0:40:01.440 --> 0:40:04.520
<v Speaker 1>seven or four, but the Vats still putting up runs,

0:40:04.600 --> 0:40:06.239
<v Speaker 1>but they fell. So a guy that you were talking

0:40:06.239 --> 0:40:08.960
<v Speaker 1>about last week and that all of a sudden getting

0:40:09.120 --> 0:40:11.680
<v Speaker 1>kind of hot. And as you say, Kakuchi four Seattle,

0:40:11.880 --> 0:40:15.560
<v Speaker 1>Kakuji six runs, six intings rather five intes, three runs,

0:40:15.680 --> 0:40:18.600
<v Speaker 1>only water were earned. He walked to he struck out

0:40:18.880 --> 0:40:22.799
<v Speaker 1>six ventra. Kacuchis here right now, sits at three point

0:40:22.880 --> 0:40:26.360
<v Speaker 1>four three. What do you think? Yeah, he's been I

0:40:26.760 --> 0:40:29.920
<v Speaker 1>think pretty much what you wanted when you drafted him. Um,

0:40:30.480 --> 0:40:32.840
<v Speaker 1>you got him at a decent price, and he's pitching

0:40:32.920 --> 0:40:38.280
<v Speaker 1>pretty well overall. I mean he's consistent lately. Uh, he doesn't.

0:40:38.440 --> 0:40:39.680
<v Speaker 1>He's not gonna I don't think he'll have to be

0:40:39.719 --> 0:40:41.919
<v Speaker 1>an elite picture by any means, though. I think he'll

0:40:42.000 --> 0:40:44.719
<v Speaker 1>he'll be good. I don't know. I don't know who

0:40:44.760 --> 0:40:47.960
<v Speaker 1>to compare him to. I don't have anything, but like,

0:40:48.280 --> 0:40:50.759
<v Speaker 1>the consistency is what you want to see. Six inning,

0:40:50.800 --> 0:40:54.719
<v Speaker 1>seven things every start. Three runs are less. Uh, he gets,

0:40:55.000 --> 0:40:57.719
<v Speaker 1>you know, anywhere from you know, five six k's around

0:40:57.760 --> 0:41:01.719
<v Speaker 1>the cape, raining solid across the board. It so obviously

0:41:01.760 --> 0:41:04.160
<v Speaker 1>he should be you know, it's exactly what you wanted.

0:41:04.760 --> 0:41:07.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't think you could have asked for much more, right, Yeah,

0:41:07.200 --> 0:41:09.640
<v Speaker 1>I agree with you. You say, Cokuchi a guy that

0:41:09.800 --> 0:41:12.280
<v Speaker 1>was gaining a lot of steam in the pre season,

0:41:12.360 --> 0:41:16.799
<v Speaker 1>in spring training, during draft season, frankly, and he's starting

0:41:16.840 --> 0:41:18.919
<v Speaker 1>to live up to that now. Over his last four

0:41:19.080 --> 0:41:21.160
<v Speaker 1>starts venture, this guy has not allowed more than three

0:41:21.239 --> 0:41:22.680
<v Speaker 1>runs in any of those starts. He's giving you a

0:41:22.760 --> 0:41:25.160
<v Speaker 1>quality start in each of them. He's also giving you

0:41:25.280 --> 0:41:27.560
<v Speaker 1>some length. He's going deeper into starts as well. His

0:41:27.680 --> 0:41:29.920
<v Speaker 1>past two, specifically, he's giving you six innings pitch the

0:41:30.000 --> 0:41:33.160
<v Speaker 1>two before that seven and two thirds against the Yankees.

0:41:33.280 --> 0:41:35.200
<v Speaker 1>That was the Pine Tower game, by the way, and

0:41:35.280 --> 0:41:37.440
<v Speaker 1>then they'll start before that against the Indians. It was

0:41:37.520 --> 0:41:40.560
<v Speaker 1>seven innings pitched during that time, a two point zero

0:41:40.800 --> 0:41:44.640
<v Speaker 1>three e R, a three point five five fit strikeouts

0:41:44.680 --> 0:41:46.600
<v Speaker 1>in twenty six and two thirds, and he's pitched only

0:41:46.719 --> 0:41:49.960
<v Speaker 1>six walks during that time as well. You say, COUCHI

0:41:50.320 --> 0:41:53.319
<v Speaker 1>coming around here, Greggy, Yeah, couchis, Couchi is good man.

0:41:53.560 --> 0:41:56.560
<v Speaker 1>Like I said this, do you come the infatu You

0:41:56.640 --> 0:41:59.200
<v Speaker 1>get annoyed that he's going to have those short outings

0:41:59.280 --> 0:42:02.640
<v Speaker 1>we had where Justice Sheffield pitched the majority. He's basically

0:42:02.719 --> 0:42:04.680
<v Speaker 1>acts as the opener for one of the games, and

0:42:04.680 --> 0:42:06.960
<v Speaker 1>I think it's gonna happen like once every five starts.

0:42:07.239 --> 0:42:09.520
<v Speaker 1>So you really got to pay attention, Like if you're

0:42:09.520 --> 0:42:12.120
<v Speaker 1>playing a points league to you cannot make the mistake

0:42:12.160 --> 0:42:14.040
<v Speaker 1>of having Cacuchi in your line up for the week

0:42:14.120 --> 0:42:15.879
<v Speaker 1>where he only gives you the one ending pitch because

0:42:16.080 --> 0:42:18.400
<v Speaker 1>that's just gonna absolutely which is actually coming up because

0:42:18.440 --> 0:42:20.320
<v Speaker 1>it's coming up soon, right, Yeah, it should be. April

0:42:20.880 --> 0:42:24.399
<v Speaker 1>was the last time he opened against Texas. Maybe start

0:42:24.560 --> 0:42:26.239
<v Speaker 1>might be this, It might be this weekend. It could

0:42:26.280 --> 0:42:27.719
<v Speaker 1>be it could be that next start for him, and

0:42:27.760 --> 0:42:30.040
<v Speaker 1>so keep an eye on on that idea, because haven't

0:42:30.040 --> 0:42:32.319
<v Speaker 1>said your line up yet for this week. Do keep

0:42:32.320 --> 0:42:33.840
<v Speaker 1>an eye on that. Take a look with the Mariners

0:42:33.840 --> 0:42:37.359
<v Speaker 1>beat reporters are saying um and where ultimately they fall.

0:42:37.560 --> 0:42:40.879
<v Speaker 1>Mariners now three games under five hundred despite the victor

0:42:41.880 --> 0:42:46.200
<v Speaker 1>all averages. Greggy all right, Uh, Kyle Gibson yesterday for

0:42:46.360 --> 0:42:48.239
<v Speaker 1>four minutesode of six and things nine hits, four runs,

0:42:48.280 --> 0:42:51.160
<v Speaker 1>and people are pretty high on Kyle Gibson didn't work

0:42:51.200 --> 0:42:54.480
<v Speaker 1>out yesterday against Seattle four. The Mariners, though, Ed went

0:42:54.880 --> 0:42:56.880
<v Speaker 1>deep for the thirteenth time the season, Miss Haniger went

0:42:56.920 --> 0:42:58.839
<v Speaker 1>deep for the twelve and Dan Mulgil blackably it's back

0:42:58.840 --> 0:43:01.279
<v Speaker 1>to back days with whole runs his thirteen who run

0:43:01.360 --> 0:43:03.439
<v Speaker 1>of the year here he got cold. If he didn't

0:43:03.520 --> 0:43:06.160
<v Speaker 1>drop him, as Floria said, don't drop Dann bilbilback yet.

0:43:06.200 --> 0:43:09.319
<v Speaker 1>Wait it worked out. Yeah, he's been one of these

0:43:09.360 --> 0:43:11.279
<v Speaker 1>guys up and down. I think that's exactly what he's

0:43:11.320 --> 0:43:14.160
<v Speaker 1>gonna be. You just look at his profile. He's a

0:43:14.200 --> 0:43:17.040
<v Speaker 1>guy that I'm gonna strike out a little bit at times.

0:43:17.080 --> 0:43:19.120
<v Speaker 1>So that's gonna be those are gonna be the games where,

0:43:19.200 --> 0:43:21.040
<v Speaker 1>like you see him, he's gonna be in a lull,

0:43:21.080 --> 0:43:23.080
<v Speaker 1>he's gonna slump a little bit. But he's got some

0:43:23.160 --> 0:43:25.560
<v Speaker 1>pretty serious power potential and we've seen that now. He

0:43:25.920 --> 0:43:28.040
<v Speaker 1>was hot early on, got really really cold, and then

0:43:28.040 --> 0:43:29.759
<v Speaker 1>now he's getting hot again. I believe he's hit like

0:43:29.800 --> 0:43:31.560
<v Speaker 1>three or four home runs over the past week or

0:43:31.640 --> 0:43:34.399
<v Speaker 1>so for Seattle. And it's not like it's a great

0:43:34.440 --> 0:43:36.920
<v Speaker 1>hitters ballpark either, So that just lets you know how

0:43:37.000 --> 0:43:39.040
<v Speaker 1>powerful he is because he can he can drive the

0:43:39.080 --> 0:43:41.640
<v Speaker 1>ball regardless of where he is. And Edwin and Karnacio

0:43:41.840 --> 0:43:44.880
<v Speaker 1>just doing more of the same two five batting average,

0:43:44.920 --> 0:43:48.279
<v Speaker 1>that's fine. Thirteen home runs uh up to thirty three

0:43:48.400 --> 0:43:51.160
<v Speaker 1>ribbies too, so he's too just getting getting the job

0:43:51.239 --> 0:43:55.000
<v Speaker 1>done here for the Seattle Mariners venture. Yeah, um, very streaky.

0:43:55.160 --> 0:43:58.000
<v Speaker 1>The question is would you rather have like him or

0:43:59.120 --> 0:44:02.000
<v Speaker 1>I know, this guy's really cold, but justin smoke with

0:44:02.120 --> 0:44:04.000
<v Speaker 1>the pedigree, they gotta have vocal back at this point.

0:44:04.080 --> 0:44:09.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't really care abougree exactly. I would rather have

0:44:09.120 --> 0:44:12.440
<v Speaker 1>vocal vocal back at this point. He does struggle mightily

0:44:12.480 --> 0:44:16.120
<v Speaker 1>against left handed pitching, which could be frustrating for head

0:44:16.160 --> 0:44:17.840
<v Speaker 1>to head points league, So he was dropped in one

0:44:17.840 --> 0:44:19.319
<v Speaker 1>of my leagues, and I think I looked into picking

0:44:19.400 --> 0:44:21.839
<v Speaker 1>them up, but I saw that the Mariners either face

0:44:21.920 --> 0:44:23.880
<v Speaker 1>two or three lefties this week, and I said, you know,

0:44:23.960 --> 0:44:25.960
<v Speaker 1>he might actually sit out those games. He only has

0:44:26.000 --> 0:44:28.160
<v Speaker 1>twenty one at bats against lefties on the season, so

0:44:28.560 --> 0:44:30.359
<v Speaker 1>it seems like those are the games where they sit

0:44:30.440 --> 0:44:31.960
<v Speaker 1>him a little bit more, and you know they have

0:44:32.040 --> 0:44:33.759
<v Speaker 1>other players that they can get it in there and

0:44:33.840 --> 0:44:36.080
<v Speaker 1>d d H. He sitting two eighty two with a

0:44:36.320 --> 0:44:39.920
<v Speaker 1>one thousand eighty four OPS against right e's one forty

0:44:39.960 --> 0:44:42.360
<v Speaker 1>three with a seven oh nine OPS against lefties. So

0:44:43.120 --> 0:44:44.439
<v Speaker 1>he's the guy that you you might have to worry

0:44:44.440 --> 0:44:48.440
<v Speaker 1>about with the splits. Yes, and you have to be

0:44:48.560 --> 0:44:51.759
<v Speaker 1>careful in weekly leagues. What week is starting him too

0:44:52.120 --> 0:44:53.600
<v Speaker 1>if you have them in weekly leagues, because if he

0:44:53.640 --> 0:44:56.640
<v Speaker 1>does get cold, it will probably be for a little while. Great.

0:44:56.800 --> 0:44:58.600
<v Speaker 1>Is it safe to say that the Cubs traded away

0:44:58.640 --> 0:45:02.000
<v Speaker 1>the wrong Schober brother because it kind of was like brothers.

0:45:04.160 --> 0:45:09.400
<v Speaker 1>They're both just like, you know, gargantuan humans that have beards.

0:45:10.719 --> 0:45:12.200
<v Speaker 1>They kind of look alike if you look at them

0:45:12.239 --> 0:45:14.719
<v Speaker 1>side by side. I think the Cubs might have might

0:45:14.760 --> 0:45:18.000
<v Speaker 1>have flowed this one up venture. You think, so looks

0:45:18.040 --> 0:45:21.399
<v Speaker 1>better than Schwarber, at least this year looks. Swarber hasn't

0:45:21.400 --> 0:45:26.080
<v Speaker 1>been great for years years, right, But you know Schwarber

0:45:26.239 --> 0:45:29.480
<v Speaker 1>was like hugely towed when he first came up and

0:45:29.600 --> 0:45:32.600
<v Speaker 1>was raking for the Cubs. So you know, they had

0:45:32.600 --> 0:45:34.600
<v Speaker 1>a lot of promise for this guy. He really fell

0:45:34.600 --> 0:45:37.000
<v Speaker 1>off the map. He's got six homers, he got fifteen Ribbies,

0:45:37.040 --> 0:45:39.200
<v Speaker 1>and he has logo box almost has more home runs

0:45:39.200 --> 0:45:44.560
<v Speaker 1>than Schober has RBIs. That's bad, Yeah, that's bad. He

0:45:44.719 --> 0:45:47.320
<v Speaker 1>is only twenty six years old, though, I mean I

0:45:47.480 --> 0:45:51.480
<v Speaker 1>could see him. The Yankees wanted him years ago for

0:45:51.520 --> 0:45:53.920
<v Speaker 1>the Chapman trade. It ended up getting labor, which I'm

0:45:53.960 --> 0:45:57.240
<v Speaker 1>fine with. Like, you know what if Kyle Swarber becomes

0:45:57.239 --> 0:45:58.680
<v Speaker 1>a free agent and like the Cups are like, all right,

0:45:58.680 --> 0:46:00.960
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna let you go. Swing is pretty We don't

0:46:00.960 --> 0:46:02.960
<v Speaker 1>need stadium. The thing is, we don't need another guy

0:46:03.040 --> 0:46:06.800
<v Speaker 1>that can't be put defense and d h the team already.

0:46:06.920 --> 0:46:10.680
<v Speaker 1>You don't they don't though, Well now that now they don't,

0:46:11.760 --> 0:46:16.080
<v Speaker 1>they don't. Yeah, Well, just like Kendricks Morales, he's hot morale,

0:46:17.280 --> 0:46:19.120
<v Speaker 1>but Stands back then he's doing they were doing. You

0:46:19.120 --> 0:46:21.120
<v Speaker 1>would have to imagine the standing probably DH is most

0:46:21.160 --> 0:46:23.920
<v Speaker 1>of the time until you know, judges back to I

0:46:23.960 --> 0:46:28.040
<v Speaker 1>don't know that's true. Yeah, Like there's gonna be a rotation.

0:46:28.239 --> 0:46:31.920
<v Speaker 1>Gardner's defense is obviously like he's gonna play. But like,

0:46:32.400 --> 0:46:34.880
<v Speaker 1>I can't even argument that Stands are better defender than

0:46:34.920 --> 0:46:40.800
<v Speaker 1>Clint Frasser. Baby, I think you can, Baby, I probably

0:46:40.840 --> 0:46:43.040
<v Speaker 1>would still trust Clint Fraser a little bit. I don't

0:46:43.040 --> 0:46:45.680
<v Speaker 1>think I would, But you know, we also has the

0:46:45.680 --> 0:46:49.279
<v Speaker 1>shoulder thing, like not mess with Giancarlo Stanton, Like if

0:46:49.320 --> 0:46:51.960
<v Speaker 1>he comes back, like, let's stick in our power to

0:46:52.040 --> 0:46:55.680
<v Speaker 1>keep him healthy. Right by the way, we uh Blue

0:46:55.760 --> 0:46:59.080
<v Speaker 1>Jay's Red Sox outside Luke Malley first run of the

0:46:59.080 --> 0:47:03.440
<v Speaker 1>season off of David Price. Prices return today from the

0:47:03.520 --> 0:47:05.920
<v Speaker 1>I L so it's a two star week. They actually

0:47:06.160 --> 0:47:08.600
<v Speaker 1>I was watching it and they put up the Toronto lineup,

0:47:08.640 --> 0:47:11.280
<v Speaker 1>and I'm like, how is this team even school runs?

0:47:11.520 --> 0:47:13.640
<v Speaker 1>They're so most of the time they don't. That's why

0:47:13.719 --> 0:47:17.600
<v Speaker 1>we streammar pictures against them everywhere. Eld is getting hot though,

0:47:17.640 --> 0:47:21.920
<v Speaker 1>guys getting six homewords last week, Glad home running hit

0:47:22.000 --> 0:47:24.560
<v Speaker 1>yesterday was Calvin Area monster. I mean it was like

0:47:25.719 --> 0:47:28.239
<v Speaker 1>it was way inside pitch and he still managed to

0:47:28.400 --> 0:47:30.839
<v Speaker 1>pull his hands on enough to get it out. I mean,

0:47:31.080 --> 0:47:33.279
<v Speaker 1>the guy is so impressed speed. And it was his

0:47:33.320 --> 0:47:35.839
<v Speaker 1>first home run to left field. Think about that. All

0:47:35.880 --> 0:47:37.600
<v Speaker 1>of his other home runs have either gone to center

0:47:37.719 --> 0:47:40.560
<v Speaker 1>or right field, which shows tremendous power. There has been

0:47:40.600 --> 0:47:44.200
<v Speaker 1>a trade in what sport Major League Baseball. A Lanta

0:47:44.239 --> 0:47:49.800
<v Speaker 1>Braves have acquired one of Frankie's guys, Anthony swore zak

0:47:50.640 --> 0:47:56.160
<v Speaker 1>Ah and cash considerations from the Seattle Mariners in exchange

0:47:56.200 --> 0:47:59.880
<v Speaker 1>for left handed pittuer Jesse Biddle and right handed picture

0:48:00.000 --> 0:48:07.000
<v Speaker 1>prospect right handed picture Rhodas. Wow, so he's gonna be

0:48:07.000 --> 0:48:08.960
<v Speaker 1>out for the year. Maybe the Mariners are kind of

0:48:09.120 --> 0:48:11.240
<v Speaker 1>forward thinking things. This guy is gonna be our closer

0:48:11.280 --> 0:48:14.440
<v Speaker 1>in the future, Greggy, I'll throw this one back at you,

0:48:14.960 --> 0:48:18.600
<v Speaker 1>this guy swarzak Any chance he gets save opportunities here

0:48:18.719 --> 0:48:20.640
<v Speaker 1>or do you think he's I think it's possible. I

0:48:20.680 --> 0:48:22.880
<v Speaker 1>think it's I don't. I don't think he will. Just

0:48:22.920 --> 0:48:26.320
<v Speaker 1>because Luke Luke Jackson has performed well thus far, he

0:48:26.400 --> 0:48:28.640
<v Speaker 1>might get in there. It doesn't really have experience, But

0:48:28.760 --> 0:48:31.879
<v Speaker 1>like Swarzak, I was touting him early on in the season.

0:48:31.920 --> 0:48:34.000
<v Speaker 1>I picked him up for cheap and if you leave um,

0:48:34.239 --> 0:48:36.080
<v Speaker 1>and he converted a few saves. But since then, I

0:48:36.120 --> 0:48:40.000
<v Speaker 1>mean he's he's been terrible great sola better than Luke Jackson.

0:48:40.040 --> 0:48:42.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. He's blowed a couple recently, also hasn't.

0:48:43.160 --> 0:48:45.880
<v Speaker 1>Maybe that's why they want more of a veteran presence

0:48:45.880 --> 0:48:47.879
<v Speaker 1>in the back of the bullpen. Maybe Luke Jackson because

0:48:47.880 --> 0:48:51.320
<v Speaker 1>he's inexperienced. Me personally, right now, I feel Luke Jackson

0:48:51.560 --> 0:48:54.600
<v Speaker 1>is the guy still, even with this acquisition of Swarzak,

0:48:54.640 --> 0:48:56.919
<v Speaker 1>I think Swarzak is probably like a seventh eighth and guy. Yeah,

0:48:56.920 --> 0:48:58.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean he shouldn't be the closes right away. He

0:48:58.239 --> 0:49:01.120
<v Speaker 1>has a five two. Where's that? Yeah, you shouldn't be

0:49:01.160 --> 0:49:03.840
<v Speaker 1>thrown into a club. He hasn't been great so his

0:49:03.960 --> 0:49:07.520
<v Speaker 1>first couple of But you're saying Seattle, they're they're looking

0:49:07.560 --> 0:49:09.600
<v Speaker 1>for the closure of the future, close in the future.

0:49:09.600 --> 0:49:11.279
<v Speaker 1>But I think they heard of Swarzack salary and this

0:49:11.400 --> 0:49:13.520
<v Speaker 1>guy and is like a piece of okay, And Jesse

0:49:13.600 --> 0:49:15.600
<v Speaker 1>Biddle was a former top prospect and he's done something

0:49:15.800 --> 0:49:17.120
<v Speaker 1>things out of the bullpen for them is like a

0:49:17.160 --> 0:49:19.120
<v Speaker 1>long reliever. So so it's like a build of the

0:49:19.160 --> 0:49:21.560
<v Speaker 1>bullpen for the future. Like we're a young guy and

0:49:21.600 --> 0:49:23.479
<v Speaker 1>you got a veteran. Is this guy and I feel

0:49:23.480 --> 0:49:27.279
<v Speaker 1>like he's a veteran. He's at old I'm gonna I

0:49:27.280 --> 0:49:30.480
<v Speaker 1>would think he's Yeah, I was gonna say high twenty.

0:49:30.520 --> 0:49:32.560
<v Speaker 1>So he's twenty eight years old. So you know, he

0:49:32.640 --> 0:49:33.960
<v Speaker 1>might be able to be the closer for like the

0:49:34.080 --> 0:49:36.000
<v Speaker 1>next couple of years for them, if anything. But the

0:49:36.120 --> 0:49:39.680
<v Speaker 1>question is is even a good closing right of trying

0:49:39.680 --> 0:49:41.680
<v Speaker 1>to replace him for years? I mean, I've been a

0:49:41.719 --> 0:49:43.600
<v Speaker 1>this guy, you know, guy, Hey, say what you want

0:49:43.600 --> 0:49:45.759
<v Speaker 1>about him. Last year two point one one e r

0:49:45.800 --> 0:49:49.239
<v Speaker 1>A save sixteen games, pretty name good guys, come on,

0:49:49.440 --> 0:49:51.960
<v Speaker 1>But the rest of his point one seven whip, it's

0:49:52.000 --> 0:49:53.879
<v Speaker 1>not not bad. The year before that two eight three

0:49:53.960 --> 0:49:55.600
<v Speaker 1>e r A. I think you guys are selling the

0:49:55.640 --> 0:49:57.840
<v Speaker 1>roads this guy. In a little short, I do agree

0:49:57.880 --> 0:49:59.839
<v Speaker 1>that it seems like the Braves have tried to replace him,

0:50:00.000 --> 0:50:02.319
<v Speaker 1>But I don't think he's a bad pitcher. He's not bad,

0:50:02.760 --> 0:50:06.440
<v Speaker 1>but I just don't know if he's a quality closer

0:50:06.480 --> 0:50:08.600
<v Speaker 1>for a whole season, you know what I mean. It's

0:50:08.600 --> 0:50:10.839
<v Speaker 1>better than anything else the matters are doing. Oh yeah,

0:50:11.960 --> 0:50:15.320
<v Speaker 1>and binas alias or whatever, you know, cheap bid that

0:50:15.680 --> 0:50:19.000
<v Speaker 1>um Modica had in our league, and he said that

0:50:19.040 --> 0:50:21.759
<v Speaker 1>he was going to bid on him last week. Could

0:50:21.760 --> 0:50:24.839
<v Speaker 1>be back soon, could be back. I believe it's as

0:50:25.560 --> 0:50:29.440
<v Speaker 1>early as like last week of May something like that.

0:50:29.520 --> 0:50:31.080
<v Speaker 1>So we're getting close to the data. Might be like

0:50:32.560 --> 0:50:34.759
<v Speaker 1>remember he got placed on the sixty day I l

0:50:35.520 --> 0:50:37.440
<v Speaker 1>back in late March, so we're getting close to that,

0:50:37.640 --> 0:50:40.279
<v Speaker 1>you know, two months time period here, and I think

0:50:40.360 --> 0:50:42.759
<v Speaker 1>it's pretty likely that he ends up as the closer again, Greg.

0:50:42.840 --> 0:50:45.200
<v Speaker 1>So if you need a closer, stashed hunter Shrikland for now.

0:50:45.960 --> 0:50:48.440
<v Speaker 1>Anything else from yesterday that he wanted to hit off

0:50:48.520 --> 0:50:51.920
<v Speaker 1>right and make sure we got to ums here first

0:50:51.920 --> 0:50:54.680
<v Speaker 1>of them? Yeah, Kessing here hit a homer yesterday, Danny Duffy,

0:50:54.760 --> 0:50:57.240
<v Speaker 1>keep getting it done, Greg. Howbout that another another quality

0:50:57.280 --> 0:50:59.319
<v Speaker 1>start here for him? Six any pitched one or run.

0:50:59.360 --> 0:51:01.560
<v Speaker 1>I know I brought him up you and Florio kind

0:51:01.560 --> 0:51:03.320
<v Speaker 1>of laughed at me. It's all get another one of

0:51:03.360 --> 0:51:08.160
<v Speaker 1>these veterans. But the deeper leagues I think he should

0:51:08.160 --> 0:51:12.120
<v Speaker 1>be maybe not a must owned player and a twelve teamer.

0:51:12.200 --> 0:51:14.759
<v Speaker 1>But eventry he's pitching well right now? Yeah, yeah, listen.

0:51:14.800 --> 0:51:16.520
<v Speaker 1>I always thought he was a good pitcher when he

0:51:16.680 --> 0:51:18.560
<v Speaker 1>first came into the league, and you know, he had

0:51:18.600 --> 0:51:20.920
<v Speaker 1>his ups and downs. He had that one great season.

0:51:21.480 --> 0:51:23.279
<v Speaker 1>What was that a couple of years ago? Yeah, it

0:51:23.360 --> 0:51:26.440
<v Speaker 1>was like three at this point, right, So, I mean

0:51:26.560 --> 0:51:30.040
<v Speaker 1>he's got stuff. I just feel like he's had a

0:51:30.200 --> 0:51:32.879
<v Speaker 1>kind of an unlucky career. You know, things haven't really

0:51:32.920 --> 0:51:36.200
<v Speaker 1>worked out in his favorite hasn't been consistent consistent enough either.

0:51:36.760 --> 0:51:38.239
<v Speaker 1>I mean I would take a chance on him, I

0:51:38.280 --> 0:51:39.880
<v Speaker 1>would wait a little longer. I think I want to

0:51:39.920 --> 0:51:42.560
<v Speaker 1>see more consistency because that was always the issue with him.

0:51:43.239 --> 0:51:45.880
<v Speaker 1>You know, how about the Yankees yesterday, Greg, I was

0:51:46.160 --> 0:51:48.200
<v Speaker 1>the Yankees one, first place they are in the first place.

0:51:48.239 --> 0:51:49.600
<v Speaker 1>I was gonna go the Yankees, but I thought just

0:51:49.920 --> 0:51:51.880
<v Speaker 1>just hitting on the Braves and the Brewers is more important.

0:51:51.880 --> 0:51:54.800
<v Speaker 1>Because Michael Holtonevitch, which finally had a good start. It

0:51:54.960 --> 0:51:56.960
<v Speaker 1>was it's the Brewers to six innings, two run ball,

0:51:56.960 --> 0:51:59.680
<v Speaker 1>I didn't walk anybody, struck out three only running and

0:51:59.760 --> 0:52:04.200
<v Speaker 1>two solo shots. Christian Yelloch and to cass A hero

0:52:04.239 --> 0:52:06.320
<v Speaker 1>as we mentioned, and then for the brew cru Brandon

0:52:06.360 --> 0:52:08.480
<v Speaker 1>Rudroff continuous to get it done. He also didn't want

0:52:08.480 --> 0:52:10.960
<v Speaker 1>anybody while allowing two runs chuck out six the only

0:52:11.000 --> 0:52:13.440
<v Speaker 1>two rerunsident he allowed runs solo home runs the Freddie

0:52:13.440 --> 0:52:16.640
<v Speaker 1>Freeman in a round laguna. Yeah, Brandon Woodruff has been awesome,

0:52:16.680 --> 0:52:18.640
<v Speaker 1>and we spoke about that like it was common for him.

0:52:18.680 --> 0:52:20.759
<v Speaker 1>You look at the underlying numbers for him, they were

0:52:20.880 --> 0:52:23.120
<v Speaker 1>much better than his surface. E r A gets a

0:52:23.160 --> 0:52:25.920
<v Speaker 1>lot of swinging strikes. And we spoke about this rotation

0:52:26.000 --> 0:52:27.920
<v Speaker 1>before the season with Nick Pollack a picture list, and

0:52:27.960 --> 0:52:31.000
<v Speaker 1>we said there's upside here. It's just trying to decipher

0:52:31.440 --> 0:52:34.320
<v Speaker 1>which one is going to come to fruition. Corbin Burns

0:52:34.360 --> 0:52:36.640
<v Speaker 1>has some nasty stuff, but he's gonna be used as

0:52:36.640 --> 0:52:41.000
<v Speaker 1>a reliever. Freddy Peralta has bounced back somewhat since he

0:52:41.200 --> 0:52:43.640
<v Speaker 1>has returned, and he had one game where like he

0:52:43.760 --> 0:52:45.640
<v Speaker 1>was get an opener and he came in and he

0:52:45.760 --> 0:52:49.000
<v Speaker 1>was all right. But I think the answer is definitively

0:52:49.040 --> 0:52:51.719
<v Speaker 1>Brandon Woodruff of the three, um, you know, he might

0:52:51.760 --> 0:52:54.200
<v Speaker 1>have the most, might have the most upside in this rotation.

0:52:54.280 --> 0:52:56.920
<v Speaker 1>And I will say along with stashing guy like on

0:52:57.040 --> 0:52:59.120
<v Speaker 1>a strickland right now, to mean Nelson is getting close,

0:52:59.160 --> 0:53:03.080
<v Speaker 1>Craig reaching start five and third and he's pitched eight strikeouts.

0:53:03.120 --> 0:53:05.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm still stashing him in a few locations. If he's

0:53:05.120 --> 0:53:06.759
<v Speaker 1>available in your league, I think he's he's like less

0:53:06.800 --> 0:53:09.920
<v Speaker 1>than owned. Now is the time he was always this

0:53:10.080 --> 0:53:12.680
<v Speaker 1>one turn in the rotation? Though, why do you why

0:53:12.680 --> 0:53:16.040
<v Speaker 1>do you always do that? Why do you need it now?

0:53:17.120 --> 0:53:20.160
<v Speaker 1>Now that it's coming soon? You know I might jump on,

0:53:21.800 --> 0:53:23.080
<v Speaker 1>might have to jump on. You need to see this

0:53:23.120 --> 0:53:26.040
<v Speaker 1>from faults and average to by the I mean the

0:53:26.120 --> 0:53:28.640
<v Speaker 1>biggest key for me again similar to like I got

0:53:28.719 --> 0:53:31.600
<v Speaker 1>like Sandy Alkantara. He has struggled with walks mightily and

0:53:31.680 --> 0:53:34.320
<v Speaker 1>home runs. Still had the home runs here, but didn't

0:53:34.320 --> 0:53:36.719
<v Speaker 1>walk anybody. Only three strikeouts. You need to see more

0:53:36.760 --> 0:53:39.200
<v Speaker 1>than that. But it is impressive that he was able

0:53:39.200 --> 0:53:41.520
<v Speaker 1>to put together a quality start against the Brewers of all.

0:53:41.640 --> 0:53:43.640
<v Speaker 1>So you're holding faulty because I got a question from

0:53:43.680 --> 0:53:46.600
<v Speaker 1>somebody in my league my home. Yeah, he texted me.

0:53:46.640 --> 0:53:49.560
<v Speaker 1>He's like, I'm losing my patients with faulty now. But

0:53:49.640 --> 0:53:51.680
<v Speaker 1>you paid a lot to kind of you know, even

0:53:51.719 --> 0:53:53.640
<v Speaker 1>though he was hurt, you still drafted him higher than

0:53:53.680 --> 0:53:55.560
<v Speaker 1>you wanted to. I would probably hold him and keep

0:53:55.560 --> 0:53:57.239
<v Speaker 1>her Dynasty League because you got it. I'm late, so

0:53:57.320 --> 0:53:59.080
<v Speaker 1>that keeper value is probably gonna be good for years

0:53:59.120 --> 0:54:01.080
<v Speaker 1>to come. But it's a playing a redraft and there's

0:54:01.080 --> 0:54:03.719
<v Speaker 1>a picture that comes along. I don't mind dropping. I

0:54:03.800 --> 0:54:05.880
<v Speaker 1>want to thank Matt moodiego for joining as the closer

0:54:05.960 --> 0:54:08.520
<v Speaker 1>Chris Venture as well. Steve sew the third yesterday. By

0:54:08.560 --> 0:54:11.120
<v Speaker 1>the way, I have a great night everybody. We'll see tomorrow.

0:54:11.400 --> 0:54:11.640
<v Speaker 1>We're gon