WEBVTT - Cathy Marcus on Commercial Real Estate

0:00:02.040 --> 0:00:07.840
<v Speaker 1>This is Master's in Business with Barry Ridholds on Bloomberg Radio.

0:00:09.440 --> 0:00:12.640
<v Speaker 1>This week on the podcast, I have an extra special guest.

0:00:13.080 --> 0:00:18.400
<v Speaker 1>Kathy Marcus is co CEO and Global COO of Pigium

0:00:18.480 --> 0:00:22.239
<v Speaker 1>real Estate, a two hundred and eight billion dollar investor

0:00:22.360 --> 0:00:25.760
<v Speaker 1>in real estate, part of the giant real estate investment

0:00:25.760 --> 0:00:30.520
<v Speaker 1>firm Pigium. She has had a number of different positions

0:00:30.560 --> 0:00:36.000
<v Speaker 1>within Pigium, including managing their flagship Core real Estate fund

0:00:36.320 --> 0:00:40.400
<v Speaker 1>before she moved into management. She has been on all

0:00:40.440 --> 0:00:43.840
<v Speaker 1>of the big lists, Baron's one hundred most Influential Women

0:00:43.880 --> 0:00:47.879
<v Speaker 1>in US finance, lots and lots of others. There are

0:00:47.960 --> 0:00:52.920
<v Speaker 1>few people in the world better situated to discuss commercial

0:00:52.960 --> 0:00:57.279
<v Speaker 1>real estate investing from every perspective. They do debt, they

0:00:57.320 --> 0:01:01.040
<v Speaker 1>do equity, they invest in public real estate, invest in private.

0:01:01.400 --> 0:01:05.160
<v Speaker 1>She has lived and invested through not just a great

0:01:05.160 --> 0:01:09.200
<v Speaker 1>financial crisis, but the SNL crisis and a number of

0:01:09.240 --> 0:01:14.080
<v Speaker 1>other fascinating experiences in real estate. If you're at all

0:01:14.200 --> 0:01:20.399
<v Speaker 1>interested in learning how a large investor in global real

0:01:20.480 --> 0:01:24.240
<v Speaker 1>estate operates, then you're going to really enjoy this conversation.

0:01:24.720 --> 0:01:29.840
<v Speaker 1>With no further ado. My discussion with pgem's Kathy Marcus.

0:01:30.200 --> 0:01:30.600
<v Speaker 2>Thank you.

0:01:31.080 --> 0:01:34.400
<v Speaker 1>It's good to have you here. So let's dive into

0:01:34.480 --> 0:01:40.080
<v Speaker 1>your background, starting with your undergraduate work. You study real

0:01:40.160 --> 0:01:44.600
<v Speaker 1>estate finance and entrepreneurial management at Wharton. As an undergraduate,

0:01:44.640 --> 0:01:47.280
<v Speaker 1>you go to NYU to get a master's in real

0:01:47.360 --> 0:01:50.840
<v Speaker 1>estate investment and development. So you knew from when you

0:01:50.880 --> 0:01:55.040
<v Speaker 1>were essentially a teenager you wanted to be working in.

0:01:54.960 --> 0:01:57.960
<v Speaker 2>Real estate, and I'm very fortunate that it worked out

0:01:58.000 --> 0:02:00.160
<v Speaker 2>because there's no plan B there. You can see. I

0:02:00.160 --> 0:02:03.560
<v Speaker 2>did not study anything else. So people often ask me

0:02:03.640 --> 0:02:06.160
<v Speaker 2>how at the age literally of seventeen, I knew that

0:02:06.240 --> 0:02:09.760
<v Speaker 2>I wanted to be in real estate, and I think

0:02:09.800 --> 0:02:12.920
<v Speaker 2>that I kind of triangulated on it. I have no

0:02:13.520 --> 0:02:16.799
<v Speaker 2>family history, I have no I knew a real estate

0:02:16.800 --> 0:02:19.800
<v Speaker 2>developer I thought was really great. I knew I wanted

0:02:19.840 --> 0:02:23.240
<v Speaker 2>to do something in business. I was always good at math,

0:02:23.680 --> 0:02:27.000
<v Speaker 2>but I really I just didn't relate to things that

0:02:27.040 --> 0:02:31.880
<v Speaker 2>were more esoteric bonds options. It just wasn't doing it

0:02:31.919 --> 0:02:34.880
<v Speaker 2>for me. And I always really loved the built environment.

0:02:35.200 --> 0:02:38.400
<v Speaker 2>I like architecture. I like as a real estate person

0:02:38.440 --> 0:02:41.200
<v Speaker 2>you walk through your assets, you can touch and feel things.

0:02:41.440 --> 0:02:45.120
<v Speaker 2>I love to see things developed. I like the idea

0:02:45.200 --> 0:02:48.000
<v Speaker 2>of kind of urban planning. I always say, if I

0:02:48.040 --> 0:02:50.480
<v Speaker 2>hadn't been a real estate investor, I would have loved

0:02:50.480 --> 0:02:54.000
<v Speaker 2>to have studied more about urban planning. I like placemaking.

0:02:54.080 --> 0:02:56.679
<v Speaker 2>So really, if you combined wanting to be an investor

0:02:57.040 --> 0:03:01.400
<v Speaker 2>with liking architecture design placemaking, it really leads you to

0:03:01.400 --> 0:03:01.880
<v Speaker 2>real estate.

0:03:02.160 --> 0:03:05.440
<v Speaker 1>You anticipated one of my questions, which was was anyone

0:03:05.480 --> 0:03:07.440
<v Speaker 1>in the family in real estate? My mom was a

0:03:07.440 --> 0:03:11.040
<v Speaker 1>real estate agent, like home to everything from home designs

0:03:11.080 --> 0:03:16.760
<v Speaker 1>and renovation to pricing and financing. Was dinner table conversation

0:03:16.880 --> 0:03:19.560
<v Speaker 1>in my house. Nothing like that from you. This just

0:03:20.120 --> 0:03:24.280
<v Speaker 1>wholly sprung up out of Nowah pretty much.

0:03:24.360 --> 0:03:29.080
<v Speaker 2>I mean, my dad was a small entrepreneur and did

0:03:29.160 --> 0:03:32.760
<v Speaker 2>invest in some commercial real estate, but really not in

0:03:32.800 --> 0:03:36.040
<v Speaker 2>a primary way. And my mom is a speech pathologist,

0:03:36.080 --> 0:03:40.560
<v Speaker 2>So our dinner table conversation definitely had a business orientation,

0:03:40.760 --> 0:03:44.760
<v Speaker 2>especially a small business owner, and so I definitely learned

0:03:44.800 --> 0:03:47.240
<v Speaker 2>a lot there. And I think it also my dad's

0:03:47.240 --> 0:03:51.040
<v Speaker 2>business was global, and so it pequked an interest in

0:03:51.080 --> 0:03:53.920
<v Speaker 2>me in working internationally. But the real estate thing was

0:03:54.000 --> 0:03:54.880
<v Speaker 2>kind of out of the blue.

0:03:55.160 --> 0:03:59.080
<v Speaker 1>So you graduate both undergrad and graduate with just real

0:03:59.160 --> 0:04:04.240
<v Speaker 1>estate related training. What were your first few jobs after school?

0:04:04.320 --> 0:04:07.080
<v Speaker 2>Like I had a very traditional start, I started off

0:04:07.400 --> 0:04:10.680
<v Speaker 2>as an analyst and I worked initially. My first two

0:04:10.800 --> 0:04:15.640
<v Speaker 2>jobs were with syndicators, essentially in a business that doesn't

0:04:15.680 --> 0:04:18.400
<v Speaker 2>exist anymore as it did. I worked for a very

0:04:18.440 --> 0:04:21.360
<v Speaker 2>large syndicator right out of school, which was right around

0:04:21.400 --> 0:04:23.960
<v Speaker 2>the time the tax laws changed and so that whole

0:04:23.960 --> 0:04:25.279
<v Speaker 2>business was upended.

0:04:25.680 --> 0:04:28.760
<v Speaker 1>And before you go further define what a syndicator is

0:04:28.800 --> 0:04:30.600
<v Speaker 1>for people who may not remember sure.

0:04:30.839 --> 0:04:34.120
<v Speaker 2>Essentially you buy assets. It could be all kinds of assets.

0:04:34.160 --> 0:04:37.640
<v Speaker 2>The company that I worked for was called Integrated Resources,

0:04:37.680 --> 0:04:39.880
<v Speaker 2>and we did a lot of real estate, but also

0:04:39.960 --> 0:04:44.440
<v Speaker 2>things like airplane leasing and movies. In fact, Dirty Dancing

0:04:44.520 --> 0:04:46.880
<v Speaker 2>was one of the big movies that we financed while

0:04:46.920 --> 0:04:49.320
<v Speaker 2>I was there, and so they needed people to help

0:04:49.360 --> 0:04:51.839
<v Speaker 2>acquire the real estate and then also one of my

0:04:51.880 --> 0:04:55.560
<v Speaker 2>primary jobs was to help capitalize it and find financing

0:04:55.640 --> 0:04:58.960
<v Speaker 2>for it, because the idea of syndication is that you

0:04:59.000 --> 0:05:01.480
<v Speaker 2>make a giant purchase and then you sell it off

0:05:01.520 --> 0:05:05.000
<v Speaker 2>in smaller units to really more of a retail investor.

0:05:05.279 --> 0:05:07.840
<v Speaker 2>And in those days, it could be as small as

0:05:07.880 --> 0:05:11.040
<v Speaker 2>like a twenty five to fifty thousand dollars unit that

0:05:11.240 --> 0:05:13.919
<v Speaker 2>would be sold through a broker dealer, a Sharson Lehman.

0:05:14.240 --> 0:05:15.919
<v Speaker 2>Lots of people who are no longer in the game,

0:05:16.440 --> 0:05:19.479
<v Speaker 2>and it was a way for individual investors to a

0:05:20.040 --> 0:05:23.600
<v Speaker 2>own assets in a small slice they could never access themselves.

0:05:23.800 --> 0:05:26.960
<v Speaker 2>But in those days, they were very tax driven, very.

0:05:26.839 --> 0:05:30.359
<v Speaker 1>Favorable treatment of those purchases, not like regular stocks and

0:05:30.400 --> 0:05:32.800
<v Speaker 1>bonds exactly, And all that went away with a couple

0:05:32.880 --> 0:05:35.520
<v Speaker 1>of tax changes. First Reagan and then I think it

0:05:35.560 --> 0:05:37.320
<v Speaker 1>was Clinton did some changes as.

0:05:37.160 --> 0:05:41.960
<v Speaker 2>Well, exactly as did Integrated Resources. Yeah, exactly.

0:05:42.040 --> 0:05:46.240
<v Speaker 1>Oh that's very funny. So you end up at PGUM eventually,

0:05:46.480 --> 0:05:50.599
<v Speaker 1>and you start out, did you start out at the

0:05:50.600 --> 0:05:53.680
<v Speaker 1>flagship core equity real estate fund or did you work

0:05:53.720 --> 0:05:56.599
<v Speaker 1>your way towards that, because eventually you were running that

0:05:56.640 --> 0:05:57.280
<v Speaker 1>for a few years.

0:05:57.279 --> 0:05:59.000
<v Speaker 2>I did. I worked my way toward that. I had

0:05:59.000 --> 0:06:01.480
<v Speaker 2>two stops before that. I worked in sort of a

0:06:01.560 --> 0:06:04.719
<v Speaker 2>quasi portfolio management role for like a single client account

0:06:04.720 --> 0:06:08.240
<v Speaker 2>type business. And then I went to be the chief

0:06:08.320 --> 0:06:12.120
<v Speaker 2>under writer for the US investments and really got to

0:06:12.200 --> 0:06:16.159
<v Speaker 2>underwrite all new investments in the US, all across the country,

0:06:16.200 --> 0:06:19.240
<v Speaker 2>all asset classes. It was a tremendous experience for me,

0:06:19.640 --> 0:06:22.760
<v Speaker 2>something that we often have had as a rotational position.

0:06:22.839 --> 0:06:24.440
<v Speaker 2>So I did it for three years and it was

0:06:24.680 --> 0:06:25.800
<v Speaker 2>a really great growth exit.

0:06:25.880 --> 0:06:28.240
<v Speaker 1>Now when you say all asset classes.

0:06:27.960 --> 0:06:29.920
<v Speaker 2>Sorry, all sectors of real estate.

0:06:29.720 --> 0:06:32.119
<v Speaker 1>Oh okay, so not because at one point in time

0:06:32.200 --> 0:06:34.760
<v Speaker 1>you were doing something with equity.

0:06:34.440 --> 0:06:37.240
<v Speaker 2>Is that right, head of head of us equity at

0:06:37.400 --> 0:06:40.839
<v Speaker 2>Pigeon real Estate meeting equity versus debt, not equities versus

0:06:41.360 --> 0:06:41.960
<v Speaker 2>got it all right.

0:06:41.880 --> 0:06:44.120
<v Speaker 1>I want to think you. So it's been real estate

0:06:44.440 --> 0:06:45.160
<v Speaker 1>all the way down.

0:06:45.279 --> 0:06:49.000
<v Speaker 2>That's the real estate through and through equity, debt, private, public,

0:06:49.080 --> 0:06:50.159
<v Speaker 2>but always real estate.

0:06:50.800 --> 0:06:52.919
<v Speaker 1>So tell us a little bit about the experience of

0:06:53.000 --> 0:06:56.600
<v Speaker 1>running the Core Flagship real Estate Fund. What was that Like?

0:06:56.640 --> 0:06:59.080
<v Speaker 1>You did that for like eight years? Is that right?

0:06:59.120 --> 0:07:01.080
<v Speaker 2>I did it for longer. It was over ten, and

0:07:01.560 --> 0:07:04.839
<v Speaker 2>it was a tremendous experience. And actually you had asked,

0:07:05.320 --> 0:07:07.840
<v Speaker 2>you know, whether that was my first stop at pg

0:07:07.880 --> 0:07:11.559
<v Speaker 2>in real estate formally Prudential real Estate Investors, and it wasn't.

0:07:11.600 --> 0:07:14.120
<v Speaker 2>But it was the job that I wanted when I

0:07:14.160 --> 0:07:18.760
<v Speaker 2>took the job. My first job at PGM. Essentially the

0:07:18.840 --> 0:07:22.000
<v Speaker 2>person who was running the Core fund at the time

0:07:22.080 --> 0:07:25.280
<v Speaker 2>was someone who I sought out as a mentor because

0:07:25.320 --> 0:07:27.520
<v Speaker 2>I knew that that was the job that I wanted,

0:07:27.600 --> 0:07:29.880
<v Speaker 2>and I worked toward that. So I was on that

0:07:30.240 --> 0:07:33.320
<v Speaker 2>fun team for over ten years, spanning kind of the

0:07:33.400 --> 0:07:36.280
<v Speaker 2>run up to the GFC, so lots of good times

0:07:36.320 --> 0:07:39.280
<v Speaker 2>for only about two to three years of my first

0:07:39.280 --> 0:07:41.840
<v Speaker 2>couple of years there, and then I worked on it

0:07:41.880 --> 0:07:45.520
<v Speaker 2>throughout the GFC and then became the senior portfolio manager

0:07:45.640 --> 0:07:49.480
<v Speaker 2>during the recovery period. It was quite a time to

0:07:50.240 --> 0:07:52.120
<v Speaker 2>be running that kind of a fund, or even just

0:07:52.160 --> 0:07:55.080
<v Speaker 2>working on that kind of fund. It was a you know,

0:07:55.120 --> 0:07:58.960
<v Speaker 2>I had seen other crises. I mean, the SNL crisis

0:07:59.000 --> 0:08:03.320
<v Speaker 2>in the real estate business was something that was a

0:08:03.440 --> 0:08:07.239
<v Speaker 2>very pivotal learning experience for me, and I came into

0:08:07.280 --> 0:08:10.560
<v Speaker 2>the GFC with some of those skills from working through

0:08:10.560 --> 0:08:14.560
<v Speaker 2>the SNL crisis. But every crisis is different, and you know,

0:08:14.600 --> 0:08:16.920
<v Speaker 2>when I was working through the SNL crisis, I was

0:08:17.000 --> 0:08:20.559
<v Speaker 2>much more junior, so someone else, you know, was worried

0:08:20.600 --> 0:08:22.600
<v Speaker 2>about what would happen. They just told me what to do,

0:08:23.040 --> 0:08:24.520
<v Speaker 2>and now this time I had to worry about what

0:08:24.560 --> 0:08:27.600
<v Speaker 2>would happen, and it was it was a great experience.

0:08:27.840 --> 0:08:33.440
<v Speaker 1>So when I hear GFC and SNL crisis, I think workouts, reorgs,

0:08:33.480 --> 0:08:36.959
<v Speaker 1>and distressed investing. Did you do all of that? What

0:08:37.320 --> 0:08:41.079
<v Speaker 1>did you actually do in the eighth nine era, maybe

0:08:41.080 --> 0:08:43.480
<v Speaker 1>even a little before when Short said rolled over.

0:08:43.360 --> 0:08:46.160
<v Speaker 2>Well, in the SNL crisis, I was doing primarily workouts,

0:08:46.200 --> 0:08:50.040
<v Speaker 2>both debt and equity workouts, and I learned so much

0:08:50.480 --> 0:08:55.320
<v Speaker 2>doing that, and was also in a big dispositions role

0:08:55.440 --> 0:08:59.000
<v Speaker 2>in terms of real estate owned that have been foreclosed upon,

0:08:59.360 --> 0:09:04.040
<v Speaker 2>but also performing and unperforming loans, commercial mortgage securitization, and

0:09:04.080 --> 0:09:08.880
<v Speaker 2>even residential mortgage securitization. So I was very, very distressed

0:09:08.960 --> 0:09:13.600
<v Speaker 2>oriented during the SNL crisis, and I would recommend to

0:09:13.760 --> 0:09:17.160
<v Speaker 2>anyone who wants to learn about a business, work through

0:09:17.160 --> 0:09:19.400
<v Speaker 2>a major crisis, and you're going to get fifteen years

0:09:19.440 --> 0:09:22.199
<v Speaker 2>of experience in three years. That was my experience.

0:09:22.440 --> 0:09:27.280
<v Speaker 1>To be fair, the SNL crisis, I don't want to

0:09:27.320 --> 0:09:30.520
<v Speaker 1>downplay it too much, but it almost seems quaint, yes,

0:09:30.679 --> 0:09:35.040
<v Speaker 1>compared to the GFC. It was. You didn't get that

0:09:35.200 --> 0:09:38.200
<v Speaker 1>sense of free fall. It was clearly a mess, but

0:09:38.280 --> 0:09:40.440
<v Speaker 1>it was like, all right, we'll figure this out. The

0:09:40.520 --> 0:09:43.360
<v Speaker 1>GFC in real time was like holy cow, this thing

0:09:43.480 --> 0:09:44.840
<v Speaker 1>is we're off the rails here.

0:09:45.280 --> 0:09:47.960
<v Speaker 2>Very different, right, and in particular in real estate because

0:09:48.000 --> 0:09:50.440
<v Speaker 2>the SNL crisis. You could certainly make an argument that

0:09:50.480 --> 0:09:53.720
<v Speaker 2>we shot ourselves in the foot in the SNL crisis.

0:09:53.920 --> 0:09:56.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, but that was really all the banks that were

0:09:56.160 --> 0:09:56.600
<v Speaker 1>doing it.

0:09:56.600 --> 0:09:57.880
<v Speaker 2>It was the banks, But there were a lot of

0:09:57.880 --> 0:10:00.760
<v Speaker 2>empty buildings. I mean, we were building and building building.

0:10:00.679 --> 0:10:02.720
<v Speaker 1>Texas notorious for see through.

0:10:02.480 --> 0:10:06.120
<v Speaker 2>Building building things exactly, so, so that was very different.

0:10:06.160 --> 0:10:08.640
<v Speaker 2>And you're right, it felt like real estate was in

0:10:08.720 --> 0:10:11.280
<v Speaker 2>free fall, and clearly the banking system was in free fall,

0:10:11.559 --> 0:10:13.640
<v Speaker 2>but the government was there with you know, the big

0:10:13.720 --> 0:10:17.080
<v Speaker 2>RTC bailout, and it didn't feel like the world was

0:10:17.120 --> 0:10:19.760
<v Speaker 2>falling apart, right. The GFC felt like the world was

0:10:19.800 --> 0:10:22.760
<v Speaker 2>falling apart, and it was very difficult to understand. I

0:10:22.800 --> 0:10:26.119
<v Speaker 2>think that the S and L crisis, you could understand

0:10:26.160 --> 0:10:30.400
<v Speaker 2>that the banks were just lending, lending, lending and building building,

0:10:30.440 --> 0:10:32.439
<v Speaker 2>and we had empty buildings, and even if you're not

0:10:32.480 --> 0:10:34.920
<v Speaker 2>in real estate, you understood what that was about. The

0:10:35.000 --> 0:10:39.319
<v Speaker 2>GFC was really a lot of esoteric financial products that

0:10:39.679 --> 0:10:41.920
<v Speaker 2>you know, the average person didn't understand. It actually ended

0:10:42.000 --> 0:10:44.720
<v Speaker 2>up that a lot of financial professionals didn't understand them either.

0:10:44.880 --> 0:10:47.040
<v Speaker 2>We didn't know that at the time, but it really

0:10:47.040 --> 0:10:49.720
<v Speaker 2>felt so much more systemic, and it felt like this

0:10:49.800 --> 0:10:53.480
<v Speaker 2>you know, giant thing that was almost not understandable to

0:10:53.559 --> 0:10:56.760
<v Speaker 2>many people had gone awry, good good times.

0:10:57.040 --> 0:10:59.360
<v Speaker 1>You know, those of us who were working in the

0:10:59.400 --> 0:11:03.040
<v Speaker 1>world defying then if you were not on the wrong

0:11:03.120 --> 0:11:07.440
<v Speaker 1>side of what was going on, it was endlessly fascinating

0:11:07.480 --> 0:11:10.600
<v Speaker 1>and just you know, a graduates degree and if you

0:11:10.720 --> 0:11:14.640
<v Speaker 1>were in charge of assets that were collapsing, it had

0:11:14.679 --> 0:11:18.400
<v Speaker 1>to be just nightmarish every day. It was relentless and

0:11:18.559 --> 0:11:21.599
<v Speaker 1>just never seemed to end. So that was you know,

0:11:21.800 --> 0:11:23.640
<v Speaker 1>all the people I know who started working in the

0:11:23.640 --> 0:11:26.400
<v Speaker 1>industry after that, it's like, oh, you guys missed the

0:11:26.400 --> 0:11:27.000
<v Speaker 1>big party.

0:11:27.000 --> 0:11:30.240
<v Speaker 2>It's amazing exactly well, you see that now you can

0:11:30.280 --> 0:11:34.280
<v Speaker 2>tell who missed the party, because it took a lot

0:11:34.320 --> 0:11:36.840
<v Speaker 2>of people who had you know, ten or twelve experience

0:11:36.920 --> 0:11:39.520
<v Speaker 2>years of experience in our business. It took them way

0:11:39.600 --> 0:11:42.720
<v Speaker 2>too long to figure out that the world had changed

0:11:42.960 --> 0:11:46.080
<v Speaker 2>because they hadn't experienced the world changing. And you know,

0:11:46.120 --> 0:11:47.960
<v Speaker 2>those of you, those of us who've been through it

0:11:48.000 --> 0:11:50.440
<v Speaker 2>a few times, you start to get that spidey sense

0:11:50.480 --> 0:11:52.640
<v Speaker 2>that things are not as they should be, and you

0:11:52.760 --> 0:11:55.160
<v Speaker 2>kind of go right into that mode of like, okay,

0:11:55.160 --> 0:11:58.720
<v Speaker 2>stop spending money, shut down all the deals. And that's

0:11:58.800 --> 0:12:01.760
<v Speaker 2>much more difficult for some one who hasn't experienced.

0:12:01.640 --> 0:12:05.120
<v Speaker 1>Immediate sur violence things exactly. And you know, the ironic

0:12:05.160 --> 0:12:09.840
<v Speaker 1>thing is there's a generation who only last year discovered, hey,

0:12:09.880 --> 0:12:12.280
<v Speaker 1>you know the rates can go up also, right, That

0:12:12.440 --> 0:12:16.600
<v Speaker 1>was like an you know, an epiphany for a subgroup

0:12:16.600 --> 0:12:18.120
<v Speaker 1>of people who it's like, oh, I didn't know they

0:12:18.120 --> 0:12:20.719
<v Speaker 1>could raise rates. I thought they can only cut. So

0:12:21.320 --> 0:12:26.319
<v Speaker 1>now you're really in a management position. What was that

0:12:26.440 --> 0:12:31.400
<v Speaker 1>transition like from being a real estate investor to managing

0:12:31.679 --> 0:12:35.480
<v Speaker 1>a very large real estate group of professionals.

0:12:35.800 --> 0:12:39.400
<v Speaker 2>It was a much more complicated transition than I had

0:12:39.559 --> 0:12:42.880
<v Speaker 2>expected it to be. You know, it's an interesting story

0:12:42.920 --> 0:12:45.440
<v Speaker 2>that I tell, which is that our CEO at the

0:12:45.480 --> 0:12:48.280
<v Speaker 2>time came to me, this is when I was running

0:12:48.320 --> 0:12:50.840
<v Speaker 2>our largest fund. I had only been an investor in

0:12:50.880 --> 0:12:53.440
<v Speaker 2>my entire career, and he said, I'd really like for

0:12:53.480 --> 0:12:56.880
<v Speaker 2>you to be my chief operating officer. And I actually said,

0:12:56.880 --> 0:12:59.840
<v Speaker 2>which is, you know, embarrassing, but it is unfortunately some

0:13:00.200 --> 0:13:03.079
<v Speaker 2>that women, especially if my age, do I said, oh, actually,

0:13:03.160 --> 0:13:05.880
<v Speaker 2>I'm not qualified for that job. I only took, you know,

0:13:05.880 --> 0:13:08.959
<v Speaker 2>three accounting classes, and I'm you know, I don't think

0:13:09.000 --> 0:13:11.439
<v Speaker 2>i'm your person. And he said, if I wanted an accountant,

0:13:11.480 --> 0:13:14.000
<v Speaker 2>I wouldn't have come to you. I'm looking for a partner.

0:13:14.000 --> 0:13:16.120
<v Speaker 2>I'm looking for someone who wants to learn how to

0:13:16.200 --> 0:13:18.560
<v Speaker 2>run a global business. And I said, well, you know,

0:13:18.600 --> 0:13:19.920
<v Speaker 2>I feel like I kind of know how to run

0:13:19.920 --> 0:13:22.440
<v Speaker 2>a business. I'm running the largest fund. You know, there's

0:13:22.480 --> 0:13:25.240
<v Speaker 2>lots of people working on this fund, huge revenues. I

0:13:25.960 --> 0:13:27.640
<v Speaker 2>know what I'm doing. And he said, you know what,

0:13:27.880 --> 0:13:30.000
<v Speaker 2>I tried for three years, and I bet you're going

0:13:30.040 --> 0:13:32.200
<v Speaker 2>to learn a lot. And he was one hundred percent right,

0:13:32.559 --> 0:13:35.040
<v Speaker 2>you know, learning how to keep the trains on the

0:13:35.120 --> 0:13:39.559
<v Speaker 2>tracks when you're an investment professional. And I was the worst.

0:13:39.920 --> 0:13:42.960
<v Speaker 2>I was a massive prima donna. I had no appreciation

0:13:43.200 --> 0:13:45.559
<v Speaker 2>for went on behind the scenes. If there was an

0:13:45.679 --> 0:13:48.800
<v Speaker 2>error in a report or a number, I went ballistic.

0:13:48.920 --> 0:13:54.719
<v Speaker 2>I had no understanding of what it takes to deliver operationally.

0:13:55.200 --> 0:13:58.800
<v Speaker 2>And I learned quite a bit about that and it's

0:13:58.840 --> 0:14:04.360
<v Speaker 2>really been terrific, and I recommend it to all investors

0:14:04.559 --> 0:14:07.439
<v Speaker 2>who want to ultimately run a business. Take on an

0:14:07.440 --> 0:14:10.439
<v Speaker 2>operational role, because you will be shocked by how much

0:14:10.440 --> 0:14:10.800
<v Speaker 2>you learn.

0:14:11.160 --> 0:14:14.520
<v Speaker 1>So there's so much stuff to unpack there. I have

0:14:14.600 --> 0:14:18.600
<v Speaker 1>to work my way back to your initial response when

0:14:18.720 --> 0:14:23.440
<v Speaker 1>offered the operating position. It's kind of funny because you're

0:14:23.480 --> 0:14:28.080
<v Speaker 1>pointing out like this inherent difference between men and women.

0:14:28.920 --> 0:14:31.960
<v Speaker 1>Men are just clueless as to her own lack of skills,

0:14:32.360 --> 0:14:34.480
<v Speaker 1>but oh sure, what the hell, how hard can it be?

0:14:34.560 --> 0:14:37.680
<v Speaker 1>Let's rush in. Whereas and I don't want to man

0:14:37.680 --> 0:14:41.280
<v Speaker 1>explain sexism to you, but it seems that women are

0:14:41.280 --> 0:14:43.120
<v Speaker 1>more thoughtful and saying, hey, I don't know if I'm

0:14:43.280 --> 0:14:47.120
<v Speaker 1>qualified for this, whereas a dude is just like, sure,

0:14:47.240 --> 0:14:49.760
<v Speaker 1>well i'll give that a wait, fight a bear with

0:14:49.840 --> 0:14:54.400
<v Speaker 1>my bear. Okay, where do I go? Men? Men are

0:14:54.440 --> 0:14:59.440
<v Speaker 1>just the sort of self confidence, unjustified. I wonder how

0:14:59.520 --> 0:15:04.640
<v Speaker 1>much that explains what we've seen, especially in finance, in

0:15:05.040 --> 0:15:09.080
<v Speaker 1>the gender gap at senior levels, which is certainly getting better.

0:15:09.440 --> 0:15:14.640
<v Speaker 1>It is point at present. But I'm just curious if

0:15:14.680 --> 0:15:20.200
<v Speaker 1>that philosophical difference is why men rush in and women

0:15:20.760 --> 0:15:23.520
<v Speaker 1>sort of think about and say, well, that's really weigh the.

0:15:23.480 --> 0:15:26.920
<v Speaker 2>Pros and cons one hundred percent, and you know Interestingly,

0:15:27.360 --> 0:15:29.200
<v Speaker 2>you would certainly not be the first man to man

0:15:29.240 --> 0:15:31.800
<v Speaker 2>explain sexism to me. It happens all the time, which

0:15:31.960 --> 0:15:34.360
<v Speaker 2>just kind of goes back to the self awareness. It

0:15:34.360 --> 0:15:37.480
<v Speaker 2>happens constantly. But I will say things have gotten a

0:15:37.520 --> 0:15:40.120
<v Speaker 2>lot better, but you know, somewhere in the middle is

0:15:40.200 --> 0:15:43.040
<v Speaker 2>probably you know, a much better place to be, because

0:15:43.360 --> 0:15:46.200
<v Speaker 2>I will say that, you know, women have a tendency

0:15:46.520 --> 0:15:48.240
<v Speaker 2>if there are a hundred things that you need to

0:15:48.280 --> 0:15:50.360
<v Speaker 2>have for a job, if they have ninety nine, you

0:15:50.400 --> 0:15:52.920
<v Speaker 2>think they're not qualified, myself included. Right, I think I've

0:15:52.960 --> 0:15:55.920
<v Speaker 2>gotten better. But you know, if there are a hundred

0:15:55.920 --> 0:15:58.280
<v Speaker 2>things and a man might say, you know what I

0:15:58.280 --> 0:16:01.240
<v Speaker 2>could do sixty or seventy percent of that, that's probably

0:16:01.280 --> 0:16:01.760
<v Speaker 2>good enough.

0:16:01.880 --> 0:16:05.080
<v Speaker 1>Right, I think you're being generous. I think, like, you know,

0:16:05.440 --> 0:16:08.000
<v Speaker 1>I know a dude who's in that space. I could

0:16:08.040 --> 0:16:10.120
<v Speaker 1>do what he does. I think it's like that sort

0:16:10.120 --> 0:16:14.680
<v Speaker 1>of you know, not to overstate mail arrogance and recklessness,

0:16:15.400 --> 0:16:18.080
<v Speaker 1>but there is certainly a degree of Hey, worse comes

0:16:18.080 --> 0:16:20.880
<v Speaker 1>to worse, I land on my face, and I think

0:16:21.120 --> 0:16:25.400
<v Speaker 1>to some degree that's positive but often leads to the

0:16:25.440 --> 0:16:26.200
<v Speaker 1>Peter principle.

0:16:26.320 --> 0:16:28.600
<v Speaker 2>So exactly, and I do hope that you know, younger

0:16:28.640 --> 0:16:33.320
<v Speaker 2>women in business broadly and in finance, you know, can

0:16:33.560 --> 0:16:36.640
<v Speaker 2>can learn from those lessons. That's why I is embarrassing

0:16:36.760 --> 0:16:38.760
<v Speaker 2>of a story as it is. I always tell it,

0:16:38.880 --> 0:16:41.720
<v Speaker 2>especially to younger women, because I don't want them to

0:16:41.760 --> 0:16:45.480
<v Speaker 2>make that same mistake. I was very fortunate that, you know,

0:16:45.600 --> 0:16:48.520
<v Speaker 2>I had a boss who really pushed me, because that

0:16:48.840 --> 0:16:51.360
<v Speaker 2>I wouldn't have taken it necessarily my own volition.

0:16:51.680 --> 0:16:54.960
<v Speaker 1>Huh. Really really interesting. So let's talk a little bit

0:16:55.000 --> 0:16:59.040
<v Speaker 1>about that giant portfolio of investments. What type of real

0:16:59.120 --> 0:17:04.440
<v Speaker 1>estate does PGIUM invest in? Do you have specific geography

0:17:04.680 --> 0:17:06.080
<v Speaker 1>sized types, what.

0:17:06.000 --> 0:17:09.240
<v Speaker 2>Do you think of We have a very very broad

0:17:09.320 --> 0:17:14.320
<v Speaker 2>investing mandate. We invest in in the US, in Latin America,

0:17:14.320 --> 0:17:17.720
<v Speaker 2>which is really primarily Mexico at this point, across Europe,

0:17:17.760 --> 0:17:21.399
<v Speaker 2>the UK, and across Asia, so we really hit all

0:17:21.440 --> 0:17:24.560
<v Speaker 2>the major markets and all the major geographies. And also

0:17:24.680 --> 0:17:27.240
<v Speaker 2>we invest in pretty much all the major food groups

0:17:27.520 --> 0:17:30.359
<v Speaker 2>and even some of the alternative food groups. In real estate,

0:17:30.480 --> 0:17:34.160
<v Speaker 2>so everything from very traditional office which I'm sure we'll

0:17:34.160 --> 0:17:38.800
<v Speaker 2>talk more about, all kinds of residential retail, data centers,

0:17:39.160 --> 0:17:43.720
<v Speaker 2>industrial manufactured housing, seniors housing, you name it, and we

0:17:44.240 --> 0:17:46.280
<v Speaker 2>probably have a bucket of capital for it.

0:17:46.440 --> 0:17:49.879
<v Speaker 1>So let's dive into those sectors. I didn't hear you

0:17:49.960 --> 0:17:53.199
<v Speaker 1>mention laboratory or medical, which I know is an up

0:17:53.200 --> 0:17:55.720
<v Speaker 1>and coming area. Is that a space you guys are

0:17:55.760 --> 0:17:59.560
<v Speaker 1>in as well? Warehouses is another definitely fast growing space.

0:18:00.359 --> 0:18:04.680
<v Speaker 1>Let's break those down. Let's start with office. What's going

0:18:04.680 --> 0:18:08.520
<v Speaker 1>on in the world of office investing. Are there certain

0:18:08.600 --> 0:18:11.640
<v Speaker 1>things you guys like to invest office wide? Are there

0:18:11.640 --> 0:18:14.560
<v Speaker 1>areas you stay away from what's happening in that space?

0:18:15.000 --> 0:18:17.320
<v Speaker 2>So right now I'm going to talk about traditional office,

0:18:17.320 --> 0:18:22.439
<v Speaker 2>not about medical office or lap science, but in the

0:18:22.480 --> 0:18:26.000
<v Speaker 2>traditional office space. We're not investing in a tremendous amount

0:18:26.040 --> 0:18:28.600
<v Speaker 2>of office right now like everyone else. We're in a

0:18:28.600 --> 0:18:30.359
<v Speaker 2>little bit of a wait and see. We have an

0:18:30.400 --> 0:18:33.560
<v Speaker 2>existing office portfolio that we're dealing with, and you know,

0:18:33.600 --> 0:18:36.480
<v Speaker 2>I'm sitting here in your Bloomberg office and it's a

0:18:36.520 --> 0:18:39.240
<v Speaker 2>buzzing hive of lots of people. There are many office

0:18:39.240 --> 0:18:42.200
<v Speaker 2>buildings you could walk into in any city around the

0:18:42.200 --> 0:18:43.520
<v Speaker 2>world where that would not be the case.

0:18:43.680 --> 0:18:46.120
<v Speaker 1>So this is clearly a Class A building. And when

0:18:46.160 --> 0:18:49.240
<v Speaker 1>we look at other Class A buildings on Park Avenue,

0:18:49.359 --> 0:18:52.800
<v Speaker 1>they seem to be fairly you know, seventy five to

0:18:52.840 --> 0:18:56.359
<v Speaker 1>eighty percent buzzing. I don't even want to say occupied.

0:18:57.160 --> 0:18:59.400
<v Speaker 1>But once you drop to the class B buildings, it's

0:18:59.400 --> 0:19:02.520
<v Speaker 1>a whole different story. How do you think about the

0:19:02.680 --> 0:19:07.040
<v Speaker 1>different quality of real estate investing and is that reflected

0:19:07.200 --> 0:19:08.160
<v Speaker 1>in their prices?

0:19:08.240 --> 0:19:11.399
<v Speaker 2>Yet so in particular in office, you know there are

0:19:11.440 --> 0:19:14.160
<v Speaker 2>going to be winners and losers, and the winners are

0:19:14.200 --> 0:19:16.720
<v Speaker 2>going to be I wouldn't even say just A not

0:19:16.840 --> 0:19:19.160
<v Speaker 2>all the A inventory is really going to be a winner.

0:19:19.200 --> 0:19:21.960
<v Speaker 2>You have to be kind of a high A. You

0:19:22.040 --> 0:19:24.240
<v Speaker 2>have to be an A that isn't just an A

0:19:24.359 --> 0:19:27.200
<v Speaker 2>because of its location. It's an A because it also

0:19:27.240 --> 0:19:31.359
<v Speaker 2>has esg attributes. It has wellness attributes, It has things

0:19:31.400 --> 0:19:34.720
<v Speaker 2>that draw employees back to the office and make them

0:19:34.760 --> 0:19:37.480
<v Speaker 2>want to be there. And you have to in these days.

0:19:37.880 --> 0:19:40.879
<v Speaker 2>When I was young, the office was shelter and a

0:19:40.920 --> 0:19:43.040
<v Speaker 2>place where people could make sure you worked all day.

0:19:43.640 --> 0:19:46.239
<v Speaker 2>Now the office is it has to be better than

0:19:46.280 --> 0:19:49.199
<v Speaker 2>your home or people are not going to come. So

0:19:49.320 --> 0:19:51.240
<v Speaker 2>here in your office there's lots of free food and

0:19:51.280 --> 0:19:53.880
<v Speaker 2>free snacks, and it's nice and bright, and there's lots

0:19:53.920 --> 0:19:56.960
<v Speaker 2>of vibrant and smart people walking around, that's a draw.

0:19:57.359 --> 0:20:00.400
<v Speaker 2>But if you're in an old office building without light,

0:20:00.880 --> 0:20:04.240
<v Speaker 2>you have low ceilings, you have no amenities, you don't

0:20:04.240 --> 0:20:07.560
<v Speaker 2>have a lot of wellness attributes to your building. You're

0:20:07.600 --> 0:20:10.040
<v Speaker 2>not in your public transportation, You're going to have a

0:20:10.040 --> 0:20:14.240
<v Speaker 2>hard time attracting people to come to your office, particularly

0:20:14.280 --> 0:20:17.520
<v Speaker 2>younger people. And if you don't have the ESG qualifications,

0:20:17.880 --> 0:20:18.679
<v Speaker 2>it's even worse.

0:20:18.800 --> 0:20:23.119
<v Speaker 1>So we'll talk more about ESG later. Tell us about wellness.

0:20:23.119 --> 0:20:26.359
<v Speaker 1>How does a building contribute to overall wellness?

0:20:26.720 --> 0:20:29.120
<v Speaker 2>Many ways, but I would say that the primary way

0:20:29.160 --> 0:20:33.080
<v Speaker 2>that really has been underscored, even more so since COVID

0:20:33.520 --> 0:20:36.600
<v Speaker 2>is in air quality. And air quality is huge, and

0:20:37.080 --> 0:20:41.840
<v Speaker 2>there is a lot of data around employees feeling better,

0:20:42.240 --> 0:20:46.399
<v Speaker 2>not getting sick, as often having more energy, not being exhausted.

0:20:46.840 --> 0:20:50.560
<v Speaker 2>That's around air quality and fresh air in particular is

0:20:50.680 --> 0:20:51.480
<v Speaker 2>very very important.

0:20:51.560 --> 0:20:54.439
<v Speaker 1>And that's not an expensive or difficult retrofit, is it.

0:20:54.480 --> 0:20:57.280
<v Speaker 1>That's something that could be done fairly easily. If I

0:20:57.320 --> 0:20:59.480
<v Speaker 1>think it was sixty minutes or somebody talked about that

0:20:59.560 --> 0:21:00.440
<v Speaker 1>not too long long ago.

0:21:00.720 --> 0:21:04.200
<v Speaker 2>That assumes you have modern systems, So that's a big assumption.

0:21:04.400 --> 0:21:07.359
<v Speaker 2>Not all buildings have the systems that would make that

0:21:07.480 --> 0:21:10.440
<v Speaker 2>an easy conversion. But there's lots of other things you

0:21:10.480 --> 0:21:12.879
<v Speaker 2>could do. You could have a gym, you could you know,

0:21:13.000 --> 0:21:15.720
<v Speaker 2>encourage your employees to get outside, you know, not in

0:21:15.760 --> 0:21:20.160
<v Speaker 2>the city as much, but other places, and increasingly in Manhattan,

0:21:20.520 --> 0:21:23.560
<v Speaker 2>people have outdoor spaces for their employees so they can

0:21:23.600 --> 0:21:26.280
<v Speaker 2>get out and get some fresh air, get some sunshine.

0:21:26.600 --> 0:21:28.920
<v Speaker 2>You know, instead of drinking coffee in a cold dark room,

0:21:28.960 --> 0:21:31.800
<v Speaker 2>you could sit on a patio. It's those types of

0:21:31.800 --> 0:21:34.400
<v Speaker 2>things that are good for your physical health and your

0:21:34.400 --> 0:21:35.000
<v Speaker 2>mental health.

0:21:35.160 --> 0:21:38.399
<v Speaker 1>Huh, really interesting. Let's talk about some other sectors you

0:21:38.480 --> 0:21:42.800
<v Speaker 1>mentioned medical, office and lab space. Yes, what's going on

0:21:42.880 --> 0:21:45.159
<v Speaker 1>in there? Is that still a growth area?

0:21:45.600 --> 0:21:48.040
<v Speaker 2>It's still a growth area. I would say that some

0:21:48.280 --> 0:21:52.360
<v Speaker 2>of the hype, particularly of the lab space, has been

0:21:52.400 --> 0:21:54.320
<v Speaker 2>taken out, and I think that's a good thing. For

0:21:54.359 --> 0:21:58.240
<v Speaker 2>a while, people were buying what I would say would

0:21:58.240 --> 0:22:02.000
<v Speaker 2>be subpar office buildings turning them into lab buildings. And

0:22:02.119 --> 0:22:05.399
<v Speaker 2>lab buildings are best purpose built. There's a lot of

0:22:05.400 --> 0:22:08.440
<v Speaker 2>extra bills and whistles that you need for a lab building.

0:22:08.520 --> 0:22:11.000
<v Speaker 2>If you think of like the absolute perfect lab building,

0:22:11.359 --> 0:22:13.480
<v Speaker 2>it's going to have you know, a lot more load

0:22:13.520 --> 0:22:16.119
<v Speaker 2>bearing because you're gonna have really heavy machinery, it's going

0:22:16.160 --> 0:22:18.240
<v Speaker 2>to have higher ceilings, it's going to have a lot

0:22:18.240 --> 0:22:20.680
<v Speaker 2>of natural light, it's going to have extra water, it's

0:22:20.720 --> 0:22:24.359
<v Speaker 2>going to have redundant electricity. There are experiments being run

0:22:24.760 --> 0:22:27.359
<v Speaker 2>in these spaces that if you know, you have a

0:22:27.400 --> 0:22:30.120
<v Speaker 2>power outage, you could lose fifteen years worth of work

0:22:30.119 --> 0:22:32.520
<v Speaker 2>and data. So you really have to have you know,

0:22:32.560 --> 0:22:35.800
<v Speaker 2>a lot of redundancies in your systems. Is very expensive

0:22:35.840 --> 0:22:38.639
<v Speaker 2>to build, but the good thing is that it's very reusable.

0:22:38.840 --> 0:22:41.960
<v Speaker 2>If you have one tenant and they leave, you can

0:22:42.320 --> 0:22:45.119
<v Speaker 2>pretty much have a plug and play with the next tenant.

0:22:45.520 --> 0:22:48.280
<v Speaker 2>So I think it's great that there's less of this

0:22:48.400 --> 0:22:51.960
<v Speaker 2>kind of conversion into lab space than there had been.

0:22:52.119 --> 0:22:54.719
<v Speaker 2>But the reality is that a lot of things that

0:22:54.760 --> 0:23:00.120
<v Speaker 2>are really demographic trends, an aging population, people living longer,

0:23:00.880 --> 0:23:05.360
<v Speaker 2>you know, advances in healthcare, needing to have green energy sources,

0:23:05.640 --> 0:23:08.040
<v Speaker 2>needing to be able to create you know, clean water.

0:23:08.480 --> 0:23:10.800
<v Speaker 2>A lot of this experimentation and a lot of the

0:23:10.880 --> 0:23:15.000
<v Speaker 2>venture capital funding is all occurring in these lab buildings.

0:23:15.840 --> 0:23:20.560
<v Speaker 1>Really interesting you mentioned converting offices to lab buildings. There's

0:23:20.560 --> 0:23:23.040
<v Speaker 1>been a lot of chatter about converting all of the

0:23:23.119 --> 0:23:28.040
<v Speaker 1>excess office space to residential. Some people say that's much

0:23:28.040 --> 0:23:31.240
<v Speaker 1>harder than it appears, especially with some of the bigger

0:23:31.480 --> 0:23:35.040
<v Speaker 1>citywide block buildings that are from the sixties and seventies.

0:23:35.400 --> 0:23:37.520
<v Speaker 1>They don't have the light and don't have the access

0:23:37.520 --> 0:23:41.440
<v Speaker 1>to windows. What's the prospect for those sort of conversions.

0:23:42.080 --> 0:23:44.760
<v Speaker 1>And let me just throw in, I remember Post nine

0:23:44.760 --> 0:23:48.240
<v Speaker 1>to eleven, the whole Lower Manhattan or a ton of

0:23:48.280 --> 0:23:53.399
<v Speaker 1>those offices got converted to residential very very successfully. What

0:23:53.440 --> 0:23:56.520
<v Speaker 1>are the odds of that happening in other city centers.

0:23:57.040 --> 0:23:59.640
<v Speaker 2>So we did some of those projects in Lower Manhattan

0:23:59.680 --> 0:24:02.040
<v Speaker 2>and or Manhattan. The floor plates tend to be smaller,

0:24:02.080 --> 0:24:06.840
<v Speaker 2>the buildings are smaller, they're thinner, and they're they're taller, right.

0:24:06.800 --> 0:24:08.760
<v Speaker 1>So you're never too far from a window, never too.

0:24:08.720 --> 0:24:11.240
<v Speaker 2>Far from a window, So it is a little bit easier,

0:24:11.359 --> 0:24:14.840
<v Speaker 2>especially some of the historic buildings downtown. One of the

0:24:14.880 --> 0:24:17.879
<v Speaker 2>ones that we converted into high end condos, you know,

0:24:17.960 --> 0:24:20.640
<v Speaker 2>had been an old JP Morgan building. It was where

0:24:20.680 --> 0:24:24.879
<v Speaker 2>his office was. So those buildings were just smaller by definition,

0:24:25.280 --> 0:24:29.960
<v Speaker 2>smaller floor plates, more windows. There's a lot of capital

0:24:30.040 --> 0:24:34.080
<v Speaker 2>being raised to convert office to residential, And it's a

0:24:34.160 --> 0:24:37.359
<v Speaker 2>really kind of a romantic notion that we have too

0:24:37.440 --> 0:24:40.000
<v Speaker 2>much office and we have a structural shortage of housing.

0:24:40.440 --> 0:24:42.320
<v Speaker 2>Wouldn't it be like the nicest thing in the world

0:24:42.320 --> 0:24:46.280
<v Speaker 2>if you could take all of this you know, bad office,

0:24:46.359 --> 0:24:49.439
<v Speaker 2>if you will, and convert it into affordable housing. Wouldn't

0:24:49.440 --> 0:24:52.240
<v Speaker 2>that be fantastic. First of all, the numbers don't work.

0:24:53.200 --> 0:24:57.119
<v Speaker 2>The physical structures don't lend themselves that well. There's probably

0:24:57.240 --> 0:25:00.119
<v Speaker 2>you know, under five percent of the office stock that

0:25:00.160 --> 0:25:03.480
<v Speaker 2>would lend itself to that. And it's very expensive in

0:25:03.520 --> 0:25:06.000
<v Speaker 2>a way. You would have to be able to get

0:25:06.400 --> 0:25:11.520
<v Speaker 2>the land for free, and someone would have to pay

0:25:11.760 --> 0:25:15.600
<v Speaker 2>to demolish the existing office building. So it's it's really

0:25:16.000 --> 0:25:16.639
<v Speaker 2>very very.

0:25:16.520 --> 0:25:20.440
<v Speaker 1>Talking about converting. You're talking about knocking down a functional

0:25:20.520 --> 0:25:23.760
<v Speaker 1>but unattractive building and putting up a brand new high road.

0:25:23.840 --> 0:25:26.439
<v Speaker 2>In many ways, that would be actually the cheaper route

0:25:26.440 --> 0:25:29.520
<v Speaker 2>to go, because you might say a functional building, it's

0:25:29.520 --> 0:25:32.280
<v Speaker 2>not functional for residential. It doesn't have the windows, it

0:25:32.280 --> 0:25:35.119
<v Speaker 2>doesn't have the plumbing. You know, you have to break

0:25:35.160 --> 0:25:37.800
<v Speaker 2>things into units. You don't want units that look like

0:25:37.840 --> 0:25:40.480
<v Speaker 2>bowling alleys. You need more elevators. I mean, there's just

0:25:40.560 --> 0:25:43.639
<v Speaker 2>lots of stuff that you need. So there will be

0:25:43.720 --> 0:25:45.439
<v Speaker 2>some of that done, and some of it's happening, some

0:25:45.480 --> 0:25:48.120
<v Speaker 2>of it's happening right now in Lower Manhattan and other

0:25:48.200 --> 0:25:51.800
<v Speaker 2>cities in DC in particular, but it's not going to

0:25:51.800 --> 0:25:52.840
<v Speaker 2>be a whostsale solution.

0:25:53.560 --> 0:25:59.520
<v Speaker 1>So you mentioned ESG earlier. How does pgium integrate ESG

0:25:59.680 --> 0:26:03.919
<v Speaker 1>factor into their investment process? What does that mean for

0:26:04.080 --> 0:26:05.120
<v Speaker 1>real estate investment?

0:26:05.640 --> 0:26:09.439
<v Speaker 2>We integrate ESG into everything that we do, from the

0:26:09.560 --> 0:26:15.360
<v Speaker 2>very beginning of identifying a potential investment, through acquisition, through operations,

0:26:15.400 --> 0:26:19.600
<v Speaker 2>and through disposition. And you know, there is a lot

0:26:19.640 --> 0:26:23.360
<v Speaker 2>of you know, political consternation, a lot of a divide,

0:26:23.400 --> 0:26:27.920
<v Speaker 2>particularly in the United States around ESG, where there are

0:26:28.040 --> 0:26:32.040
<v Speaker 2>there's a politicization of ESG in real estate. We're actually

0:26:32.119 --> 0:26:36.600
<v Speaker 2>very fortunate because there's really no conflict with you know, ESG,

0:26:36.720 --> 0:26:40.240
<v Speaker 2>especially the E in real estate investing. If you have

0:26:40.320 --> 0:26:43.680
<v Speaker 2>a more sustainable building, you're using less energy, you're using

0:26:43.800 --> 0:26:48.000
<v Speaker 2>less water, you have more efficient systems, you are in

0:26:48.000 --> 0:26:52.000
<v Speaker 2>near public transportation, you have an ESG certification, you're going

0:26:52.040 --> 0:26:54.919
<v Speaker 2>to have higher income, therefore a higher value of your asset.

0:26:55.160 --> 0:26:57.000
<v Speaker 2>You're going to be able to track the best tenants,

0:26:57.280 --> 0:26:59.480
<v Speaker 2>the best tenants are not going into a building that

0:26:59.520 --> 0:27:02.639
<v Speaker 2>does not have ESG certification. And if you're in your

0:27:02.680 --> 0:27:06.080
<v Speaker 2>public transportation, you know every tenant is looking for that.

0:27:06.200 --> 0:27:09.720
<v Speaker 2>So I really feel that ESG is just it's just

0:27:09.800 --> 0:27:13.000
<v Speaker 2>table stakes in real estate and investing. So we're fortunate

0:27:13.000 --> 0:27:14.119
<v Speaker 2>that we don't have the controversy.

0:27:14.359 --> 0:27:18.560
<v Speaker 1>It's not just higher income. You're describing much lower costs

0:27:18.560 --> 0:27:21.119
<v Speaker 1>as well. Exactly, So the building is a more profitable

0:27:21.200 --> 0:27:26.200
<v Speaker 1>unit versus a comparable non ESG compliant type of building.

0:27:26.320 --> 0:27:27.200
<v Speaker 1>Is that exactly?

0:27:27.320 --> 0:27:29.639
<v Speaker 2>And you know it's a way if you reduce your

0:27:29.640 --> 0:27:33.320
<v Speaker 2>operating expenses, you're just increasing your bottom line. And if

0:27:33.320 --> 0:27:36.719
<v Speaker 2>you take an older building that is just like you know,

0:27:37.040 --> 0:27:40.360
<v Speaker 2>it's leaking energy all over the place, and you upgrade

0:27:40.400 --> 0:27:43.960
<v Speaker 2>it to have the systems, you have just completely improved

0:27:43.960 --> 0:27:46.960
<v Speaker 2>the value of your asset. Because we value real estate

0:27:47.200 --> 0:27:51.040
<v Speaker 2>based on the net operating income, and that is the

0:27:51.160 --> 0:27:53.440
<v Speaker 2>key to being able to increase value.

0:27:53.920 --> 0:27:58.640
<v Speaker 1>Kind of hard to politicize, improving your bottom line is exactly.

0:27:58.720 --> 0:28:03.359
<v Speaker 1>So let's talk about the target net zero emissions from

0:28:03.560 --> 0:28:07.520
<v Speaker 1>real estate projects by twenty fifty. What does net zero

0:28:07.760 --> 0:28:09.920
<v Speaker 1>mean and how does one get there?

0:28:11.160 --> 0:28:13.680
<v Speaker 2>So there's lots of ways to get there, and net

0:28:13.800 --> 0:28:18.320
<v Speaker 2>zero can mean there are various ways in real estate

0:28:18.320 --> 0:28:22.680
<v Speaker 2>pathways to get to net zero. There are already several

0:28:22.720 --> 0:28:25.600
<v Speaker 2>buildings office buildings around the country that are net zero

0:28:26.200 --> 0:28:29.240
<v Speaker 2>and that was accomplished through a variety of things. One

0:28:29.760 --> 0:28:34.600
<v Speaker 2>using different building techniques, different building materials. You can use

0:28:34.640 --> 0:28:38.400
<v Speaker 2>green concrete, you can have less embedded carbon. For the

0:28:38.560 --> 0:28:43.680
<v Speaker 2>institutional real estate industry, embedded carbon is a huge issue

0:28:43.720 --> 0:28:47.360
<v Speaker 2>because you buy an asset and there's already this giant

0:28:47.400 --> 0:28:50.120
<v Speaker 2>carbon footprint that you had no control over and maybe

0:28:50.120 --> 0:28:53.200
<v Speaker 2>it was created fifty years ago. So that's a whole

0:28:53.280 --> 0:28:58.640
<v Speaker 2>other issue. But things like green concrete, things like different

0:28:58.760 --> 0:29:03.200
<v Speaker 2>sensors that you can use that help you build more efficiently.

0:29:03.600 --> 0:29:06.400
<v Speaker 2>And if you look at you know ESG and its entirety,

0:29:06.960 --> 0:29:10.959
<v Speaker 2>which is also a lot about safety and keeping people

0:29:11.000 --> 0:29:13.960
<v Speaker 2>safe and healthy. That there are lots of new construction

0:29:14.080 --> 0:29:18.560
<v Speaker 2>techniques that it's just safer construction where you might have

0:29:18.720 --> 0:29:22.520
<v Speaker 2>robots doing things that were very unsafe. You might have drones,

0:29:22.960 --> 0:29:26.240
<v Speaker 2>you know, photographing buildings instead of having people having to

0:29:26.280 --> 0:29:29.160
<v Speaker 2>go up on scaffoldings. So we have a lot of

0:29:29.200 --> 0:29:34.120
<v Speaker 2>opportunity in the built environment to mitigate and embedded carbon,

0:29:34.440 --> 0:29:37.400
<v Speaker 2>but also to reduce our use of carbon.

0:29:37.600 --> 0:29:40.680
<v Speaker 1>Huh. Really really interesting. So let's talk a little bit

0:29:40.760 --> 0:29:43.080
<v Speaker 1>about what's been going on the past couple of years

0:29:43.120 --> 0:29:46.520
<v Speaker 1>and what it looks like over the next few years.

0:29:47.800 --> 0:29:50.600
<v Speaker 1>You're not taking out a mortgage to buy a single

0:29:50.640 --> 0:29:55.800
<v Speaker 1>family home, You're doing these big projects. How does the

0:29:55.880 --> 0:30:01.200
<v Speaker 1>dislocation and volatility of the enormous right increases we've seen

0:30:01.240 --> 0:30:05.840
<v Speaker 1>in twenty one and twenty two affect the projects.

0:30:05.400 --> 0:30:08.600
<v Speaker 2>You look at, It actually affects you know, commercial real

0:30:08.680 --> 0:30:11.200
<v Speaker 2>estate investors in much the same way as it would

0:30:11.360 --> 0:30:12.520
<v Speaker 2>a residential investor.

0:30:12.680 --> 0:30:14.440
<v Speaker 1>Just the cost of carry, the cost.

0:30:14.280 --> 0:30:18.320
<v Speaker 2>Of carry, and you know, a lack of liquidity, which

0:30:18.360 --> 0:30:21.440
<v Speaker 2>is much worse in the commercial markets than it is

0:30:21.920 --> 0:30:23.040
<v Speaker 2>in the residential market.

0:30:23.120 --> 0:30:25.360
<v Speaker 1>You can't just have an open house and sell a

0:30:25.400 --> 0:30:26.960
<v Speaker 1>fifty story building over the weekend.

0:30:27.040 --> 0:30:30.280
<v Speaker 2>That doesn't exactly know that, that doesn't work. So the

0:30:30.560 --> 0:30:34.080
<v Speaker 2>lack of liquidity is you know, is often at the

0:30:34.080 --> 0:30:37.480
<v Speaker 2>heart of every real estate crisis that we have, and

0:30:37.880 --> 0:30:40.440
<v Speaker 2>that's really driving you know, a lot of what's going on,

0:30:40.480 --> 0:30:43.160
<v Speaker 2>which is of course all driven by the changes in

0:30:43.160 --> 0:30:45.880
<v Speaker 2>the real in the interest rates and you know, we're

0:30:47.080 --> 0:30:50.680
<v Speaker 2>coming upon six quarters, you know, into this new interest

0:30:50.760 --> 0:30:54.640
<v Speaker 2>rate environment, and we had you know, a nice long

0:30:54.760 --> 0:30:58.160
<v Speaker 2>free money party that was really good for real estate.

0:30:58.240 --> 0:31:02.200
<v Speaker 2>It was fantastic real estate. It was it was great.

0:31:02.680 --> 0:31:06.160
<v Speaker 2>And and so of course, you know, as works in

0:31:06.200 --> 0:31:09.080
<v Speaker 2>real estate, that your interest rates come down and the

0:31:09.160 --> 0:31:13.240
<v Speaker 2>yields on the investments come down, and everyone's expectations are

0:31:13.680 --> 0:31:16.400
<v Speaker 2>you know, not too far off from where you know,

0:31:16.640 --> 0:31:19.880
<v Speaker 2>treasuries used to be, right, and and that is, you know,

0:31:20.200 --> 0:31:22.920
<v Speaker 2>the treasuries were so low that you could be have

0:31:23.000 --> 0:31:26.560
<v Speaker 2>a four percent, five percent yield, even three percent on

0:31:26.680 --> 0:31:29.040
<v Speaker 2>a real estate investment and still have a nice cushion

0:31:29.400 --> 0:31:33.160
<v Speaker 2>over treasury. So it was a very very accommodative environment

0:31:33.520 --> 0:31:36.760
<v Speaker 2>for real estate. And now that has all changed. And

0:31:37.160 --> 0:31:41.760
<v Speaker 2>you know, in private markets the repricing always takes a

0:31:41.800 --> 0:31:44.200
<v Speaker 2>lot longer than public markets. And you even see that

0:31:44.280 --> 0:31:46.800
<v Speaker 2>within real estate looking at the real estate private markets

0:31:47.080 --> 0:31:48.440
<v Speaker 2>and the real estate public markets.

0:31:48.880 --> 0:31:52.760
<v Speaker 1>You guys in both right and public, yes, we do.

0:31:52.960 --> 0:31:58.400
<v Speaker 1>So if tell us a little bit about how they've responded.

0:31:58.800 --> 0:32:02.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to assume private markets react a little more

0:32:02.800 --> 0:32:05.680
<v Speaker 1>slowly than public markets do. Tell us about that process.

0:32:06.120 --> 0:32:08.800
<v Speaker 2>The private markets react much more slowly and in a

0:32:08.880 --> 0:32:12.920
<v Speaker 2>much more measured way, and without the same sort of

0:32:14.400 --> 0:32:19.640
<v Speaker 2>level of very very quick reaction and maybe even overreaction.

0:32:20.040 --> 0:32:22.680
<v Speaker 2>You hardly ever see that in the private markets. And

0:32:23.280 --> 0:32:27.440
<v Speaker 2>the reason is you are in the real estate public markets.

0:32:28.000 --> 0:32:32.760
<v Speaker 2>The market, meaning the stock market, is determining value, and

0:32:33.240 --> 0:32:36.360
<v Speaker 2>there's a lot more at play there than just the

0:32:36.440 --> 0:32:39.680
<v Speaker 2>value of the real estate assets, whereas in the private

0:32:39.720 --> 0:32:43.840
<v Speaker 2>markets it's appraisal based, and so it takes a long

0:32:43.960 --> 0:32:49.560
<v Speaker 2>time for appraisals to really reflect market value. And part

0:32:49.640 --> 0:32:52.640
<v Speaker 2>of that is the methodology which has been around forever,

0:32:52.800 --> 0:32:58.200
<v Speaker 2>which really relies very heavily on comparable transactions, and comparable

0:32:58.240 --> 0:33:02.120
<v Speaker 2>transactions in a period of you know, little to no liquidity,

0:33:02.440 --> 0:33:06.120
<v Speaker 2>they're just not happening, and so appraisers need a data

0:33:06.160 --> 0:33:09.400
<v Speaker 2>set and a set of facts to create a record

0:33:09.560 --> 0:33:15.160
<v Speaker 2>in order to substantiate lowering values and increasing yields, and

0:33:15.200 --> 0:33:18.479
<v Speaker 2>they just haven't really had that. Now that's starting to happen,

0:33:18.600 --> 0:33:22.080
<v Speaker 2>and we are seeing a repricing, but it's very very slow.

0:33:22.400 --> 0:33:26.600
<v Speaker 2>It will ultimately probably be a much slower repricing than

0:33:26.600 --> 0:33:30.080
<v Speaker 2>we had in the GFC. The GFC took eight quarters

0:33:30.120 --> 0:33:33.920
<v Speaker 2>in private real estate to completely adjust, but the vast

0:33:33.920 --> 0:33:37.160
<v Speaker 2>majority was a shock in the first two quarters, and

0:33:37.200 --> 0:33:39.600
<v Speaker 2>then it just kind of, you know, eked out over

0:33:39.880 --> 0:33:42.960
<v Speaker 2>several more quarters. We have something totally different here. Where

0:33:43.200 --> 0:33:46.440
<v Speaker 2>the first couple quarters, after the interest rate increases, it

0:33:46.480 --> 0:33:48.560
<v Speaker 2>was almost like people were in denial and nobody really

0:33:48.600 --> 0:33:52.120
<v Speaker 2>knew what to do because we had very little price adjustment.

0:33:52.520 --> 0:33:54.480
<v Speaker 2>And now that you know, some people have a gun

0:33:54.520 --> 0:33:57.560
<v Speaker 2>to their head, there are some transactions that are happening

0:33:58.000 --> 0:34:01.960
<v Speaker 2>or starting to see, you know, a trail if you will,

0:34:01.960 --> 0:34:05.560
<v Speaker 2>of evidence of where values should be. But you know,

0:34:05.680 --> 0:34:09.640
<v Speaker 2>most of these assets are priced quarterly, very different than

0:34:09.640 --> 0:34:13.560
<v Speaker 2>the daily pricing in the stock market. And if it

0:34:13.600 --> 0:34:16.319
<v Speaker 2>takes you know, if it used to take you know,

0:34:16.400 --> 0:34:19.640
<v Speaker 2>call it forty five to sixty days to complete a

0:34:19.680 --> 0:34:23.560
<v Speaker 2>transaction from beginning to end, it's now double or triple that.

0:34:23.880 --> 0:34:26.320
<v Speaker 2>So it's just taking much longer to get the evidence.

0:34:27.000 --> 0:34:31.640
<v Speaker 1>So the October data for single family homes October twenty

0:34:31.680 --> 0:34:36.480
<v Speaker 1>twenty three record low number of transactions. Are you suggesting

0:34:36.560 --> 0:34:41.200
<v Speaker 1>that in the private commercial real estate you're also seeing

0:34:41.520 --> 0:34:47.200
<v Speaker 1>much slower transactions and that's what's causing this lag for

0:34:47.280 --> 0:34:49.520
<v Speaker 1>a repricing. How do you work around that?

0:34:49.680 --> 0:34:54.040
<v Speaker 2>Yes, much, much, much lower transaction activity. And it's interesting

0:34:54.080 --> 0:34:58.120
<v Speaker 2>because you know, for a large owner like us, these days,

0:34:58.160 --> 0:35:02.480
<v Speaker 2>when we're talking about transactions or most talking about dispositions,

0:35:02.520 --> 0:35:05.879
<v Speaker 2>in a normal business cycle, we would, when we say transactions,

0:35:05.880 --> 0:35:09.200
<v Speaker 2>were mostly talking about acquisitions. So it's very, very different,

0:35:09.360 --> 0:35:11.680
<v Speaker 2>and that impacts both the debt and equity sides of

0:35:11.719 --> 0:35:15.040
<v Speaker 2>the business. So on the equity side, we would like

0:35:15.080 --> 0:35:18.480
<v Speaker 2>to sell some assets and improve our liquidity, and there's

0:35:18.520 --> 0:35:20.799
<v Speaker 2>not a lot of buyers there. The buyers that are

0:35:20.840 --> 0:35:25.279
<v Speaker 2>there are generally buying without any debt. So if you

0:35:25.320 --> 0:35:27.880
<v Speaker 2>think about the fact that we're also a lender, that

0:35:28.000 --> 0:35:31.399
<v Speaker 2>really impacts our lending business. Our lending business has much

0:35:31.440 --> 0:35:36.360
<v Speaker 2>lower production values across all asset types than it's had historically,

0:35:36.760 --> 0:35:39.719
<v Speaker 2>and again it's because of the lack of transaction activity.

0:35:40.120 --> 0:35:43.799
<v Speaker 1>So I'm assuming you are both buying and selling within

0:35:43.840 --> 0:35:46.880
<v Speaker 1>the same quarter, within the same month. What's the thought

0:35:46.920 --> 0:35:50.759
<v Speaker 1>process like about what properties you want to sell and

0:35:51.120 --> 0:35:54.399
<v Speaker 1>what Similarly, how do you think about what you want

0:35:54.440 --> 0:35:59.080
<v Speaker 1>to buy at the same time you're really reconfiguring your holdings.

0:35:59.280 --> 0:36:02.279
<v Speaker 2>Yes, i'd say there there's two categories of the types

0:36:02.320 --> 0:36:04.839
<v Speaker 2>of assets we want to sell right now, one is

0:36:05.520 --> 0:36:08.440
<v Speaker 2>you know, kind of just bottom line those that will sell.

0:36:08.880 --> 0:36:11.560
<v Speaker 2>So if we need to raise some capital, if we

0:36:11.920 --> 0:36:13.920
<v Speaker 2>have some debt that we want to pay off, if

0:36:13.920 --> 0:36:16.880
<v Speaker 2>we want to redeploy some capital, you can sell multi

0:36:16.880 --> 0:36:19.680
<v Speaker 2>family in the southeast this is in the US, and

0:36:19.719 --> 0:36:21.920
<v Speaker 2>you can sell industrial. Those are the two things that

0:36:22.880 --> 0:36:27.040
<v Speaker 2>sell right now. And even then you're probably going to

0:36:27.400 --> 0:36:30.960
<v Speaker 2>take a lot longer selling those assets. And very interestingly,

0:36:31.000 --> 0:36:33.760
<v Speaker 2>you might not recognize one name on the list of bidders.

0:36:33.960 --> 0:36:36.680
<v Speaker 2>Oh really, it's not the big institutional names. It's not

0:36:36.719 --> 0:36:40.920
<v Speaker 2>the people like us. It's people who are buying unlevered,

0:36:41.280 --> 0:36:45.600
<v Speaker 2>people with friends and family, family offices. Really more in

0:36:46.360 --> 0:36:50.200
<v Speaker 2>your space than in mind. And very interestingly, we often

0:36:50.280 --> 0:36:51.400
<v Speaker 2>have never heard of the people.

0:36:51.680 --> 0:36:55.239
<v Speaker 1>And they want a hard asset as opposed to a

0:36:55.440 --> 0:36:58.160
<v Speaker 1>cash flow based on all, right, it'll cost us this

0:36:58.280 --> 0:37:01.240
<v Speaker 1>much to borrow, and here's what we'll see income, and

0:37:01.640 --> 0:37:04.320
<v Speaker 1>that's what we a revenue. This is something totally different.

0:37:04.520 --> 0:37:07.280
<v Speaker 1>They want to have a hard asset and actually own it, right.

0:37:07.120 --> 0:37:09.239
<v Speaker 2>And they might want to own it for a very

0:37:09.360 --> 0:37:12.080
<v Speaker 2>very long time, especially you know those kind of owners

0:37:12.080 --> 0:37:15.560
<v Speaker 2>and right now it's an advantage to be an all

0:37:15.600 --> 0:37:19.479
<v Speaker 2>cash buyer, and during this cycle of very low interest rates,

0:37:19.480 --> 0:37:21.840
<v Speaker 2>it was not an advantage to be an all cash.

0:37:21.560 --> 0:37:26.040
<v Speaker 1>Buyer when cash is free. Exactly that, you know who

0:37:26.400 --> 0:37:29.360
<v Speaker 1>doesn't make any difference. Which kind of you're sort of

0:37:29.400 --> 0:37:35.440
<v Speaker 1>describing like the edges of a distressed market. But I

0:37:35.440 --> 0:37:37.799
<v Speaker 1>don't get the sense that the market is fully the

0:37:37.840 --> 0:37:42.600
<v Speaker 1>real estate market is fully distressed. How do you identify, Hey,

0:37:42.600 --> 0:37:46.359
<v Speaker 1>we can pick up stuff really inexpensively. Flip side of

0:37:46.360 --> 0:37:47.880
<v Speaker 1>this is, hey, maybe we're not going to get what

0:37:47.920 --> 0:37:50.680
<v Speaker 1>we want for our holdings. How do you balance that?

0:37:51.160 --> 0:37:53.920
<v Speaker 2>Well, it is a balance, and you know, it is

0:37:54.040 --> 0:37:57.000
<v Speaker 2>true to say that right now, the distress is in

0:37:57.040 --> 0:37:59.920
<v Speaker 2>the capital markets. It's in the ability to get to

0:38:00.160 --> 0:38:02.719
<v Speaker 2>and the ability to find equity if you want to

0:38:02.719 --> 0:38:05.600
<v Speaker 2>do a development. Forget about construction loans, which are almost

0:38:05.640 --> 0:38:10.480
<v Speaker 2>impossible to get right now. But from a fundamentals perspective,

0:38:10.800 --> 0:38:14.680
<v Speaker 2>with the exception of office and in particular traditional office,

0:38:15.239 --> 0:38:19.440
<v Speaker 2>most property types are doing quite well. In industrial warehouses,

0:38:19.440 --> 0:38:22.279
<v Speaker 2>as you mentioned, rents are still going up in most

0:38:22.360 --> 0:38:27.000
<v Speaker 2>markets and are expected to continue. In multifamily rentals, we're

0:38:27.040 --> 0:38:29.759
<v Speaker 2>seeing a little bit of softness in some markets where

0:38:29.800 --> 0:38:32.239
<v Speaker 2>there was a lot of supply, but long term, we're

0:38:32.280 --> 0:38:34.359
<v Speaker 2>not concerned because we know we have a structural lack

0:38:34.400 --> 0:38:37.600
<v Speaker 2>of housing. So there's retail, believe it or not, retail

0:38:37.640 --> 0:38:41.120
<v Speaker 2>who was not everyone's favorite a couple of years ago.

0:38:41.600 --> 0:38:44.120
<v Speaker 2>Even retail assets are doing pretty well right now.

0:38:44.280 --> 0:38:48.320
<v Speaker 1>So the publicly traded real estate investment trusted pretty poorly

0:38:48.760 --> 0:38:52.239
<v Speaker 1>in twenty two and twenty three. Was this a rate

0:38:52.360 --> 0:38:55.680
<v Speaker 1>story or is this just a question of too much

0:38:56.000 --> 0:38:59.200
<v Speaker 1>of one type of product not enough of another.

0:39:00.080 --> 0:39:03.399
<v Speaker 2>The interest rates story definitely played into it. But if

0:39:03.400 --> 0:39:07.440
<v Speaker 2>you think about you know reads and who invest in reads,

0:39:07.760 --> 0:39:10.680
<v Speaker 2>there are definitely pure play real estate investors who invest

0:39:10.719 --> 0:39:13.080
<v Speaker 2>in ates, like us and some of our competitors, but

0:39:13.120 --> 0:39:16.560
<v Speaker 2>there's also lots of individual investors who are investing in reads.

0:39:16.600 --> 0:39:19.959
<v Speaker 2>There's lots of big index funds that are investing in reads,

0:39:20.040 --> 0:39:22.479
<v Speaker 2>so it's not always a you know, a real estate

0:39:22.520 --> 0:39:27.480
<v Speaker 2>decision maker who is influencing the cost of some of

0:39:27.520 --> 0:39:31.279
<v Speaker 2>these stocks. But overall, I would say that if you

0:39:31.320 --> 0:39:34.239
<v Speaker 2>were to take something away from the difference between the

0:39:34.280 --> 0:39:37.239
<v Speaker 2>public markets and the private markets, the public markets react

0:39:37.360 --> 0:39:41.080
<v Speaker 2>very quickly and often overreact and we do think that

0:39:41.080 --> 0:39:44.399
<v Speaker 2>there has been an overreaction here. However, the themes are

0:39:44.440 --> 0:39:47.840
<v Speaker 2>fairly similar. If you look at some of the office rates,

0:39:48.640 --> 0:39:52.160
<v Speaker 2>they've been clobbered, and that's a reflection, of course, of

0:39:52.400 --> 0:39:55.400
<v Speaker 2>people's concerns around the office market. But what's interesting in

0:39:55.400 --> 0:39:59.759
<v Speaker 2>the public space is that the best office rates, meaning

0:39:59.760 --> 0:40:02.680
<v Speaker 2>the office rates that have the highest quality assets the

0:40:03.040 --> 0:40:08.200
<v Speaker 2>kind that I mentioned before, ESG qualifications, modern new near

0:40:08.239 --> 0:40:12.480
<v Speaker 2>public transportation, those have taken about the same hit as

0:40:12.560 --> 0:40:16.319
<v Speaker 2>once with Class B assets, So that doesn't really make sense.

0:40:16.360 --> 0:40:19.799
<v Speaker 2>There is some kind of a play there. Also, if

0:40:19.840 --> 0:40:24.120
<v Speaker 2>you look at alternatives, right some of the self storage,

0:40:24.440 --> 0:40:27.920
<v Speaker 2>data centers, some of the alternative sectors within real estate

0:40:28.239 --> 0:40:31.759
<v Speaker 2>in the public markets have reacted quite differently than you

0:40:31.840 --> 0:40:34.719
<v Speaker 2>might expect and from one another. So you know, right

0:40:34.760 --> 0:40:38.239
<v Speaker 2>now most rates are still selling at a pretty significant

0:40:38.280 --> 0:40:41.479
<v Speaker 2>discount to net asset value, which net asset value would

0:40:41.480 --> 0:40:44.360
<v Speaker 2>be a good proxy for real estate value for the

0:40:44.400 --> 0:40:48.439
<v Speaker 2>actual asset value. So that's an opportunity, you know, for us,

0:40:48.480 --> 0:40:52.120
<v Speaker 2>we see that as an opportunity. And our takeaway is

0:40:52.160 --> 0:40:56.279
<v Speaker 2>that the public markets have overreacted and overshot, and the

0:40:56.320 --> 0:40:59.400
<v Speaker 2>private markets have underreacted and somewhere in the middle is

0:40:59.400 --> 0:41:01.239
<v Speaker 2>the right value. Huh.

0:41:01.239 --> 0:41:06.040
<v Speaker 1>That's really interesting. So with the caveat that Wall Street

0:41:06.080 --> 0:41:09.520
<v Speaker 1>has been wrong about this for two or three years.

0:41:10.160 --> 0:41:14.160
<v Speaker 1>Wall Street is now anticipating at least two rate cuts

0:41:14.200 --> 0:41:18.160
<v Speaker 1>in twenty twenty four. Should real estate investors be thinking

0:41:18.200 --> 0:41:22.120
<v Speaker 1>about this? If that happens, what would the impact be

0:41:22.160 --> 0:41:25.600
<v Speaker 1>and do you think that's a realistic outcome?

0:41:26.200 --> 0:41:27.600
<v Speaker 2>Well, first of all, I think we should all be

0:41:27.640 --> 0:41:30.319
<v Speaker 2>praying for that, because that would be very, very good

0:41:30.400 --> 0:41:34.640
<v Speaker 2>for real estate overall. You know, from a realistic perspective,

0:41:35.160 --> 0:41:37.600
<v Speaker 2>I don't anticipate any of that happening in the first

0:41:37.640 --> 0:41:40.839
<v Speaker 2>half of the year. I anticipate, and I say this

0:41:41.080 --> 0:41:43.560
<v Speaker 2>extremely sadly, I think the first half of the year

0:41:43.640 --> 0:41:45.439
<v Speaker 2>is going to be, you know, more of the same

0:41:45.920 --> 0:41:48.600
<v Speaker 2>of what we've seen, and it's going to be a

0:41:48.719 --> 0:41:52.480
<v Speaker 2>very interesting twenty twenty four. All around the world, you have,

0:41:52.719 --> 0:41:55.200
<v Speaker 2>you know, lots of things going on around interest rates

0:41:55.600 --> 0:41:59.480
<v Speaker 2>and you know, stock markets and business. But underlying all

0:41:59.520 --> 0:42:02.480
<v Speaker 2>of that are a lot of very high profile elections

0:42:02.480 --> 0:42:05.080
<v Speaker 2>around the world, not just the US, and you have

0:42:05.239 --> 0:42:08.600
<v Speaker 2>you know, a geopolitical tinder box in many places. So

0:42:09.239 --> 0:42:11.680
<v Speaker 2>it is going to be very very interesting. If you

0:42:11.719 --> 0:42:15.160
<v Speaker 2>look at you know, what is happening with inflation, what

0:42:15.360 --> 0:42:18.600
<v Speaker 2>is happening you know, if you really interrogate some of

0:42:18.600 --> 0:42:22.200
<v Speaker 2>the jobs numbers and you know where the consumer seems

0:42:22.239 --> 0:42:25.799
<v Speaker 2>to be going, it would lead you to believe. I

0:42:25.840 --> 0:42:28.359
<v Speaker 2>think that you know, we're not going to see any

0:42:28.360 --> 0:42:31.400
<v Speaker 2>more hikes, and that sometime next year we're going to

0:42:31.440 --> 0:42:34.960
<v Speaker 2>start to see, you know, some decreases. Whether we get

0:42:34.960 --> 0:42:38.440
<v Speaker 2>to two, I certainly hope so, And you know it,

0:42:38.880 --> 0:42:42.680
<v Speaker 2>really I think I don't think anyone has the expectation

0:42:42.760 --> 0:42:44.720
<v Speaker 2>that we're going to go back to zero interest rates.

0:42:45.000 --> 0:42:47.440
<v Speaker 2>But if we could just get down to like two

0:42:47.600 --> 0:42:50.360
<v Speaker 2>or three instead of four or five, that would be

0:42:50.360 --> 0:42:51.080
<v Speaker 2>pretty amazing.

0:42:51.680 --> 0:42:54.040
<v Speaker 1>At this point, I would take you know, low fourth,

0:42:54.160 --> 0:42:57.640
<v Speaker 1>that'd be a huge, huge change. But you mentioned something

0:42:57.640 --> 0:42:59.640
<v Speaker 1>that I have to ask about. We have all these

0:42:59.680 --> 0:43:06.040
<v Speaker 1>elects both here and abroad. How do geopolitics and elections

0:43:06.600 --> 0:43:09.000
<v Speaker 1>affect commercial real estate.

0:43:09.440 --> 0:43:11.319
<v Speaker 2>Well, I'm going to come off as very cynical, but

0:43:12.280 --> 0:43:15.400
<v Speaker 2>we keep talking about this recession and when a recession

0:43:15.440 --> 0:43:18.120
<v Speaker 2>is going to come, and I just have a hard

0:43:18.160 --> 0:43:20.239
<v Speaker 2>time believing that we're going to be in a recessionary

0:43:20.320 --> 0:43:24.799
<v Speaker 2>environment facing a presidential election in this country. I think

0:43:24.840 --> 0:43:27.240
<v Speaker 2>that everyone is going to do everything in their power

0:43:27.239 --> 0:43:28.360
<v Speaker 2>for that not to happen.

0:43:28.400 --> 0:43:32.920
<v Speaker 1>Meaning across pulling all the levers from the federal government

0:43:32.960 --> 0:43:36.920
<v Speaker 1>to the federal Reserve. Everybody's looking to avoid a recession,

0:43:37.080 --> 0:43:40.799
<v Speaker 1>especially if inflation keeps falling the way it has been

0:43:40.840 --> 0:43:42.960
<v Speaker 1>over the past year and a half. I mean, you

0:43:43.000 --> 0:43:46.920
<v Speaker 1>could easily look at CPI and say, real estate peaked

0:43:46.960 --> 0:43:49.840
<v Speaker 1>in June twenty twenty two, it's been straight down for

0:43:49.880 --> 0:43:50.920
<v Speaker 1>the next eighteen.

0:43:50.640 --> 0:43:52.280
<v Speaker 2>Months, right, right exactly?

0:43:52.360 --> 0:43:57.560
<v Speaker 1>Huh. Quite fascinating. So your global COO, let's talk a

0:43:57.600 --> 0:44:02.399
<v Speaker 1>little bit about the global stratgy. How does PGEUM, which

0:44:02.440 --> 0:44:06.280
<v Speaker 1>I really think of as a US New Jersey based

0:44:06.360 --> 0:44:09.640
<v Speaker 1>real estate investment company, how do you think about the

0:44:09.760 --> 0:44:12.680
<v Speaker 1>global investing opportunities that are out there.

0:44:13.400 --> 0:44:17.120
<v Speaker 2>Well, it's very interesting that as much as PGEUM is

0:44:17.120 --> 0:44:21.240
<v Speaker 2>a global brand, it does always come down to prudential

0:44:21.320 --> 0:44:23.720
<v Speaker 2>being in New Jersey. It gets discussed all the time,

0:44:23.920 --> 0:44:27.200
<v Speaker 2>But we are, within PGEUM real Estate in particular, a

0:44:27.320 --> 0:44:31.280
<v Speaker 2>very very global company. We operate in fourteen different countries

0:44:31.719 --> 0:44:35.120
<v Speaker 2>and we have been investing in Europe and Asia for

0:44:36.120 --> 0:44:38.759
<v Speaker 2>twenty to twenty five years. We've been at this for

0:44:38.800 --> 0:44:42.480
<v Speaker 2>a very long time. Now, our US businesses are larger

0:44:42.520 --> 0:44:45.319
<v Speaker 2>and more mature, and it's really just because we have

0:44:45.360 --> 0:44:50.560
<v Speaker 2>a long head start in the US over our international businesses.

0:44:50.640 --> 0:44:55.239
<v Speaker 2>But you know, today's investor, especially the most sophisticated investors,

0:44:55.520 --> 0:45:00.439
<v Speaker 2>they're investing globally and they're allocating globally. And it used

0:45:00.440 --> 0:45:03.600
<v Speaker 2>to be, especially from the perspective of an American investor

0:45:03.880 --> 0:45:06.239
<v Speaker 2>in real estate, that in order to leave the home

0:45:06.280 --> 0:45:08.680
<v Speaker 2>country in order to invest in Europe, in order to

0:45:08.680 --> 0:45:11.640
<v Speaker 2>invest in Asia, there have to be a huge return premium.

0:45:12.080 --> 0:45:15.399
<v Speaker 2>It was the way of compensating for the country risk,

0:45:15.480 --> 0:45:20.000
<v Speaker 2>maybe some currency risk, and just the general lack of

0:45:20.040 --> 0:45:22.719
<v Speaker 2>certainty around investing in a market that maybe you don't

0:45:22.760 --> 0:45:26.239
<v Speaker 2>know that much about. And that has completely changed in

0:45:26.280 --> 0:45:31.160
<v Speaker 2>that the driving factor behind people being global investors is

0:45:31.200 --> 0:45:34.879
<v Speaker 2>really around diversification. It's far less around yield premium. Now

0:45:34.880 --> 0:45:39.000
<v Speaker 2>you can certainly chase yield premiums in developing markets, but

0:45:39.160 --> 0:45:44.839
<v Speaker 2>if you're investing in non developing markets outside of your

0:45:44.880 --> 0:45:48.600
<v Speaker 2>home country and their mature markets, you should not expect

0:45:48.680 --> 0:45:50.439
<v Speaker 2>much of a risk premium. At the end of the day,

0:45:50.680 --> 0:45:53.520
<v Speaker 2>it's about diversification, because if you think about it, think

0:45:53.560 --> 0:45:56.120
<v Speaker 2>about the world right now, right now, in the US.

0:45:56.160 --> 0:45:58.279
<v Speaker 2>As much as we may complain about what's going on here,

0:45:58.760 --> 0:46:01.879
<v Speaker 2>most global investors would tell you that the greatest prospect

0:46:02.160 --> 0:46:05.960
<v Speaker 2>for income growth and for economic growth is in the US,

0:46:06.160 --> 0:46:09.120
<v Speaker 2>and you would want to be if you're an Asian investor.

0:46:09.400 --> 0:46:11.239
<v Speaker 2>There's certainly a lot of growth that can go on

0:46:11.280 --> 0:46:13.399
<v Speaker 2>in Asia, but it's a bit more volatile. You might

0:46:13.440 --> 0:46:15.719
<v Speaker 2>want to have some eggs in the US basket, you

0:46:15.800 --> 0:46:17.880
<v Speaker 2>might want to have some eggs in the European basket.

0:46:18.160 --> 0:46:22.160
<v Speaker 2>So global investing is just here to stay. In my view,

0:46:22.360 --> 0:46:24.439
<v Speaker 2>it's much more of a trend. And if you want

0:46:24.440 --> 0:46:27.960
<v Speaker 2>to be a big global player in any particular asset

0:46:27.960 --> 0:46:31.120
<v Speaker 2>class or asset type, you have to be a global provider.

0:46:31.640 --> 0:46:34.960
<v Speaker 1>So let's look around the world and get an assessment

0:46:35.040 --> 0:46:37.960
<v Speaker 1>of what's going on. When I look at Europe, I

0:46:38.000 --> 0:46:41.600
<v Speaker 1>see it not only a very mature area, but I

0:46:41.600 --> 0:46:45.760
<v Speaker 1>also see an economy that hasn't really recovered fully from

0:46:45.800 --> 0:46:49.800
<v Speaker 1>the pandemic or arguably from the Great Financial Crisis.

0:46:49.840 --> 0:46:50.000
<v Speaker 2>And.

0:46:51.520 --> 0:46:55.280
<v Speaker 1>Seems to be rolling from one country's recession to the next.

0:46:55.320 --> 0:46:58.160
<v Speaker 1>Now Germany is looking really soft, what do you see

0:46:58.160 --> 0:46:59.960
<v Speaker 1>in terms of opportunities in Europe.

0:47:00.719 --> 0:47:03.440
<v Speaker 2>We definitely still see opportunity in Europe, but in terms

0:47:03.520 --> 0:47:06.720
<v Speaker 2>of you know, the economies, and you mentioned Germany. Germany

0:47:06.760 --> 0:47:09.520
<v Speaker 2>definitely is you know, is a concern for us, right

0:47:09.560 --> 0:47:13.200
<v Speaker 2>we invest quite a bit in Germany. The UK Rexit

0:47:13.360 --> 0:47:16.520
<v Speaker 2>has not been kind to real estate values in the UK,

0:47:17.080 --> 0:47:19.160
<v Speaker 2>but there are still opportunities and it's a lot of

0:47:19.160 --> 0:47:21.719
<v Speaker 2>the same themes which you know, for us, we really

0:47:21.800 --> 0:47:28.440
<v Speaker 2>think of them around demographics, around digitalization, and around decarbonization,

0:47:29.040 --> 0:47:32.600
<v Speaker 2>and if you really think about demographics, there's a lot

0:47:32.600 --> 0:47:36.760
<v Speaker 2>of the same story, which you know also often leads

0:47:36.800 --> 0:47:41.200
<v Speaker 2>you to the living sectors. We think about for young

0:47:41.239 --> 0:47:46.640
<v Speaker 2>people needing affordable first time apartments. For families, maybe with

0:47:46.719 --> 0:47:49.359
<v Speaker 2>interest rates where they are and with housing costs where

0:47:49.400 --> 0:47:52.040
<v Speaker 2>they are not being able to afford that to buy

0:47:52.080 --> 0:47:54.319
<v Speaker 2>a single family home, maybe they want to rent a

0:47:54.360 --> 0:47:58.879
<v Speaker 2>single family home. Young professionals maybe remaining renters for much

0:47:58.920 --> 0:48:01.640
<v Speaker 2>longer than they used to because the barriers to home

0:48:01.680 --> 0:48:04.880
<v Speaker 2>ownership are so much higher. We have an aging population,

0:48:05.040 --> 0:48:09.160
<v Speaker 2>we need seniors housing. There's so many different aspects of

0:48:09.200 --> 0:48:12.719
<v Speaker 2>housing that we just don't have enough of, particularly at

0:48:12.760 --> 0:48:15.560
<v Speaker 2>the affordable end of the spectrum. Affordable housing is a

0:48:15.600 --> 0:48:20.120
<v Speaker 2>crisis almost everywhere in the world, and in particular, affordable

0:48:20.200 --> 0:48:23.160
<v Speaker 2>seniors housing is really in crisis.

0:48:23.400 --> 0:48:28.799
<v Speaker 1>Huh. Really interesting. So let's address Brexit, which hasn't come

0:48:28.880 --> 0:48:33.440
<v Speaker 1>up recently. I was genuinely shocked it even happened because

0:48:33.480 --> 0:48:38.160
<v Speaker 1>it was so obvious the negative economic ramifications that would

0:48:38.239 --> 0:48:41.520
<v Speaker 1>lead from it. How are things in the UK Have

0:48:41.600 --> 0:48:45.160
<v Speaker 1>they recovered from that? Is this still a persistent drag

0:48:45.239 --> 0:48:47.680
<v Speaker 1>on their economy and what does that mean to their

0:48:47.719 --> 0:48:48.280
<v Speaker 1>real estate?

0:48:48.680 --> 0:48:51.640
<v Speaker 2>I think it is still a persistent drag. I think

0:48:51.680 --> 0:48:59.719
<v Speaker 2>that you see evidence of businesses that were from regulatory perspective,

0:49:00.360 --> 0:49:03.600
<v Speaker 2>in London and now maybe they're in Ireland, maybe they're

0:49:03.600 --> 0:49:06.560
<v Speaker 2>in the Netherlands. You definitely have seen a bit of

0:49:06.560 --> 0:49:09.360
<v Speaker 2>a drain from London. There are pockets of the London

0:49:09.400 --> 0:49:12.279
<v Speaker 2>office market that are not doing that well. The good

0:49:12.280 --> 0:49:14.560
<v Speaker 2>news is that London does have a little bit more

0:49:14.560 --> 0:49:17.120
<v Speaker 2>of a modern stock than a lot of other cities

0:49:17.160 --> 0:49:20.640
<v Speaker 2>from an office perspective. But definitely, I mean, inflation has

0:49:20.840 --> 0:49:23.600
<v Speaker 2>really taken a toll on the UK and while it's

0:49:23.719 --> 0:49:27.680
<v Speaker 2>certainly getting better, if you think about kind of just

0:49:27.960 --> 0:49:31.160
<v Speaker 2>you know, constant dominoes falling up Brexit and then the

0:49:31.200 --> 0:49:35.239
<v Speaker 2>pandemic and the war in Ukraine, and inflation and high

0:49:35.360 --> 0:49:38.640
<v Speaker 2>energy costs and the high food costs. It's really noticeable.

0:49:38.800 --> 0:49:40.839
<v Speaker 2>I can tell you. I travel to London quite a bit,

0:49:41.280 --> 0:49:44.399
<v Speaker 2>and even just as a visitor, I notice how much

0:49:44.440 --> 0:49:45.680
<v Speaker 2>more expensive everything is.

0:49:46.719 --> 0:49:50.440
<v Speaker 1>And that traces back to Brexit, not just the reason

0:49:50.520 --> 0:49:50.920
<v Speaker 1>bout them.

0:49:51.000 --> 0:49:52.719
<v Speaker 2>I think it's a combination of things, but I think

0:49:52.760 --> 0:49:54.319
<v Speaker 2>Brexit was the first domino to fall.

0:49:55.080 --> 0:49:59.960
<v Speaker 1>And you mentioned demographics. We know you're investor in Asia.

0:50:01.000 --> 0:50:03.960
<v Speaker 1>Are you an investor in Japan? We are, And what's

0:50:04.040 --> 0:50:08.360
<v Speaker 1>going on there? Their demographics are uniquely.

0:50:07.920 --> 0:50:12.960
<v Speaker 2>Challenging, Yes, uniquely challenging. And you know, if you the

0:50:13.280 --> 0:50:16.040
<v Speaker 2>one very positive thing is that interest rates are still

0:50:16.080 --> 0:50:18.960
<v Speaker 2>relatively low in Japan, still not as low as they

0:50:19.000 --> 0:50:20.840
<v Speaker 2>had been, but they're they're still.

0:50:20.640 --> 0:50:22.880
<v Speaker 1>Low, and they're not negative anymore, right exactly.

0:50:23.040 --> 0:50:26.799
<v Speaker 2>There's still very accommodative of real estate. But you know,

0:50:26.920 --> 0:50:29.520
<v Speaker 2>the demographic story in Japan is very difficult, with just

0:50:29.560 --> 0:50:32.960
<v Speaker 2>a you know, really really a preponderance of the population

0:50:33.120 --> 0:50:36.920
<v Speaker 2>is aging and that just keeps, you know, increasing, you know,

0:50:37.040 --> 0:50:41.160
<v Speaker 2>not a whole lot of immigration into Japan, so definitely

0:50:41.160 --> 0:50:42.960
<v Speaker 2>a problem. And you know, there was a lot of

0:50:43.040 --> 0:50:46.000
<v Speaker 2>hype around the Olympics and what that might mean for Japan,

0:50:46.040 --> 0:50:48.120
<v Speaker 2>and I think a lot of that ultimately, you know,

0:50:48.200 --> 0:50:51.680
<v Speaker 2>didn't come to fruition from a tourism perspective. Now, you know,

0:50:52.160 --> 0:50:55.759
<v Speaker 2>it's sad to say for my Japanese colleagues, but you know,

0:50:55.840 --> 0:50:58.360
<v Speaker 2>the yen is quite weak, and so I think that

0:50:58.440 --> 0:51:00.880
<v Speaker 2>there has been an increase in tours. I was recently

0:51:00.880 --> 0:51:04.120
<v Speaker 2>in Japan and I saw a lot of American families

0:51:04.440 --> 0:51:06.919
<v Speaker 2>traveling there. It used to be cost prohibitive to bring

0:51:06.960 --> 0:51:10.040
<v Speaker 2>a family to Tokyo and now it's not. So hopefully

0:51:10.080 --> 0:51:13.080
<v Speaker 2>there's some kind of a jump start there, but definitely

0:51:13.480 --> 0:51:17.120
<v Speaker 2>the aging population in Japan is tough in the fact

0:51:17.120 --> 0:51:19.680
<v Speaker 2>that there's been very very little real wage growth there.

0:51:19.960 --> 0:51:23.520
<v Speaker 1>Huh, really really interesting. Let me throw you a curveball.

0:51:24.680 --> 0:51:27.880
<v Speaker 1>Tell us about Real Asset X. What's going on there?

0:51:28.160 --> 0:51:30.759
<v Speaker 1>This is almost like a skunk Works project, you guys have.

0:51:31.719 --> 0:51:36.120
<v Speaker 2>Real Asset X is our innovation lab that we recently launched,

0:51:36.640 --> 0:51:40.000
<v Speaker 2>and the purpose of it is really to help to

0:51:40.160 --> 0:51:45.040
<v Speaker 2>advance technology and innovation, particularly around ESG in the real

0:51:45.160 --> 0:51:48.080
<v Speaker 2>estate industry. Not just for our portfolio, but for the

0:51:48.120 --> 0:51:51.839
<v Speaker 2>industry more broadly. And you know, we're really looking at

0:51:51.880 --> 0:51:55.560
<v Speaker 2>kind of two different sides of our lab. One is

0:51:55.840 --> 0:51:59.080
<v Speaker 2>a bit more operational, where we're thinking of ways to

0:51:59.320 --> 0:52:02.480
<v Speaker 2>more efficiently run our own business, more efficiently run our

0:52:02.480 --> 0:52:07.200
<v Speaker 2>own properties, to use our data in ways that help

0:52:07.280 --> 0:52:09.160
<v Speaker 2>us to run the business, help us to serve our

0:52:09.160 --> 0:52:12.640
<v Speaker 2>clients better. On the other side of the lab is

0:52:12.880 --> 0:52:15.640
<v Speaker 2>a bit more aspirational of what could we do with

0:52:15.680 --> 0:52:19.440
<v Speaker 2>all that data, What better investment outcomes could we have

0:52:19.560 --> 0:52:22.239
<v Speaker 2>by leveraging our data. You know, I mentioned that our

0:52:22.360 --> 0:52:26.759
<v Speaker 2>US businesses are very mature. We launched our core open

0:52:26.840 --> 0:52:29.120
<v Speaker 2>end fund that I used to manage. We launched that

0:52:29.160 --> 0:52:32.359
<v Speaker 2>in nineteen seventy. We have data going back that far

0:52:32.840 --> 0:52:36.680
<v Speaker 2>and we have lots of data. And in our lending business,

0:52:36.680 --> 0:52:38.920
<v Speaker 2>we've been lending for way longer than that, so we

0:52:38.960 --> 0:52:41.480
<v Speaker 2>have lots of data that we can leverage and so

0:52:41.520 --> 0:52:45.600
<v Speaker 2>we're very excited about that. We have several university partnerships

0:52:45.920 --> 0:52:50.200
<v Speaker 2>where we are working on certain problem statements, and we

0:52:50.280 --> 0:52:54.200
<v Speaker 2>have them all around the world. So that's very very exciting.

0:52:54.320 --> 0:52:57.040
<v Speaker 2>And you know, it's a journey, right I'll tell you

0:52:57.120 --> 0:53:01.759
<v Speaker 2>that our first problem statement we worked on with one

0:53:01.800 --> 0:53:04.680
<v Speaker 2>of our university partners here in the United States, was

0:53:04.719 --> 0:53:08.400
<v Speaker 2>really around trying to predict multi family rents, and you know,

0:53:08.640 --> 0:53:14.080
<v Speaker 2>using artificial intelligence, using some machine learning, using our own data,

0:53:14.120 --> 0:53:16.840
<v Speaker 2>but other data as well. And at the end of

0:53:16.880 --> 0:53:19.319
<v Speaker 2>the day, you know, we didn't come up with a

0:53:19.360 --> 0:53:22.000
<v Speaker 2>great answer, but now we have you know, a lot

0:53:22.040 --> 0:53:24.359
<v Speaker 2>of new information that we're going to ask the question

0:53:24.440 --> 0:53:28.279
<v Speaker 2>differently as we continue to pursue this. So it is

0:53:28.760 --> 0:53:31.560
<v Speaker 2>definitely a trial and error and I think that when

0:53:31.600 --> 0:53:34.239
<v Speaker 2>people give the impression that they kind of plugged in

0:53:34.280 --> 0:53:36.200
<v Speaker 2>the AI machine and all of a sudden they have,

0:53:36.600 --> 0:53:39.760
<v Speaker 2>you know, really really great answers, that's not how it works.

0:53:39.800 --> 0:53:42.040
<v Speaker 2>It takes a lot of work. And I think our

0:53:42.200 --> 0:53:46.120
<v Speaker 2>launching of our lab and our outreach to our university

0:53:46.120 --> 0:53:50.120
<v Speaker 2>partners is our way of acknowledging that this is a process,

0:53:50.160 --> 0:53:52.799
<v Speaker 2>and it's a learning process, and it takes more than

0:53:53.360 --> 0:53:56.359
<v Speaker 2>just a real estate investment manager to make progress. There.

0:53:57.040 --> 0:53:59.759
<v Speaker 1>Sounds really exciting, all right, I only have you for

0:53:59.800 --> 0:54:02.040
<v Speaker 1>a few more moments, so let me jump to our

0:54:02.080 --> 0:54:05.719
<v Speaker 1>favorite questions that we ask all of our guests, starting

0:54:05.760 --> 0:54:08.520
<v Speaker 1>with what have you been streaming lately. Give us your

0:54:08.520 --> 0:54:13.360
<v Speaker 1>favorite Netflix or Amazon or podcast, whatever's keeping you entertained.

0:54:13.680 --> 0:54:18.440
<v Speaker 2>Sure. I recently finished Daisy Jones on the sixth, which

0:54:18.920 --> 0:54:21.440
<v Speaker 2>was recommended to me by another woman in the business,

0:54:22.000 --> 0:54:26.840
<v Speaker 2>and I'm going to be fifty eight next week. There

0:54:26.840 --> 0:54:29.080
<v Speaker 2>for someone of my age, it just brings you back

0:54:29.120 --> 0:54:31.080
<v Speaker 2>to kind of your middle school and high school years.

0:54:31.080 --> 0:54:33.880
<v Speaker 2>With the music, it's fantastic. It's a little bit of

0:54:33.880 --> 0:54:38.480
<v Speaker 2>the story of Fleetwood Mac not loosely basically fantastic.

0:54:38.719 --> 0:54:41.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, the woman who played Daisy Jones, I was I

0:54:41.719 --> 0:54:44.040
<v Speaker 1>don't know a third way through it. When my wife says,

0:54:44.360 --> 0:54:46.759
<v Speaker 1>you know, that's Elvis Presley's daughter, I was like, oh what,

0:54:47.080 --> 0:54:50.440
<v Speaker 1>I had no idea, Right, she was fantastic.

0:54:50.000 --> 0:54:53.799
<v Speaker 2>Fantastic, So I really loved that. And in terms of

0:54:54.640 --> 0:54:59.520
<v Speaker 2>a movie or documentary, also perfect for a woman of

0:54:59.520 --> 0:55:03.359
<v Speaker 2>my age is called Being Mary Tyler Moore, and it's

0:55:03.400 --> 0:55:07.120
<v Speaker 2>about Mary Tyler Moore, and you know, she was such

0:55:07.160 --> 0:55:11.000
<v Speaker 2>an icon for young girls in the seventies of She

0:55:11.320 --> 0:55:13.400
<v Speaker 2>lived on her own, she had this cool job, she

0:55:13.520 --> 0:55:17.120
<v Speaker 2>was intentionally single, she had this social life, she was dating.

0:55:17.560 --> 0:55:21.360
<v Speaker 2>It was really very formative and they speak to a

0:55:21.360 --> 0:55:26.799
<v Speaker 2>lot of women, mostly famous women who were so influenced

0:55:26.840 --> 0:55:30.080
<v Speaker 2>by watching that show. And I definitely was, and she

0:55:30.200 --> 0:55:33.879
<v Speaker 2>was really, you know, very much of a trailblazer and

0:55:34.040 --> 0:55:35.839
<v Speaker 2>a remarkable woman. So I'd recommend that.

0:55:36.080 --> 0:55:38.600
<v Speaker 1>Huh, I'm going to put that on my list. And

0:55:38.640 --> 0:55:41.520
<v Speaker 1>when you were talking earlier, I was thinking of two things.

0:55:42.920 --> 0:55:45.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if you spend much time on YouTube,

0:55:45.680 --> 0:55:51.320
<v Speaker 1>but there are some amazing channels. One is Architectural Digest

0:55:51.480 --> 0:55:55.520
<v Speaker 1>does this, so there's lots of house listenings and just stupid,

0:55:56.160 --> 0:55:59.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, spec twenty million dollar mansions in LA's. But

0:55:59.480 --> 0:56:02.239
<v Speaker 1>the thing they do that's so interesting you kind of

0:56:02.680 --> 0:56:06.560
<v Speaker 1>reference this is they'll sit down with an architect and

0:56:06.680 --> 0:56:13.440
<v Speaker 1>he will describe a particular type of architecture that's endemic

0:56:13.520 --> 0:56:18.319
<v Speaker 1>to a specific city, or they'll describe a very specific

0:56:18.719 --> 0:56:22.000
<v Speaker 1>So one guy who does New York, here's the history

0:56:22.040 --> 0:56:25.600
<v Speaker 1>of New York residential apartment buildings and how they've progressed

0:56:26.000 --> 0:56:28.080
<v Speaker 1>over the years. And the one I just I didn't

0:56:28.080 --> 0:56:32.920
<v Speaker 1>see it yet but it just dropped was New York

0:56:33.040 --> 0:56:37.319
<v Speaker 1>Museums and the architecture of Guggenheim, MoMA, the Met and

0:56:37.360 --> 0:56:40.399
<v Speaker 1>Whitney And just like, if you like architecture. It's kind

0:56:40.400 --> 0:56:44.560
<v Speaker 1>of fascinating. The other thing you mentioned that really made

0:56:44.640 --> 0:56:47.760
<v Speaker 1>me think of a different channel was about the ESG

0:56:48.239 --> 0:56:53.319
<v Speaker 1>and the location close to mass transit. There is this

0:56:54.000 --> 0:56:58.520
<v Speaker 1>he's kind of crazy Canadian expat who relocated to the

0:56:58.520 --> 0:57:02.000
<v Speaker 1>Netherlands with his family, and his channel is called Not

0:57:02.280 --> 0:57:05.879
<v Speaker 1>Just Bikes and it's all about how to build a

0:57:05.960 --> 0:57:11.080
<v Speaker 1>city that is not only net zero but just built

0:57:11.200 --> 0:57:14.960
<v Speaker 1>around mass transit, not cars. And it's a again, if

0:57:15.000 --> 0:57:20.480
<v Speaker 1>you're interested in urban planning, the city design and architecture,

0:57:20.720 --> 0:57:23.720
<v Speaker 1>endlessly fascinated. That's great, that's a rabbit hole you can

0:57:23.760 --> 0:57:27.280
<v Speaker 1>talk too. So you mentioned one of your mentors early.

0:57:27.640 --> 0:57:31.120
<v Speaker 1>Tell us about who your mentors were and who helped

0:57:31.160 --> 0:57:32.080
<v Speaker 1>shape your career.

0:57:32.760 --> 0:57:35.680
<v Speaker 2>The person who is most influential in my career from

0:57:35.720 --> 0:57:39.280
<v Speaker 2>a young age is a woman named Yvon Competello, who

0:57:39.760 --> 0:57:42.280
<v Speaker 2>I worked for when I was in my late twenties

0:57:42.320 --> 0:57:46.520
<v Speaker 2>and early thirties, and she taught me everything I know

0:57:46.560 --> 0:57:49.200
<v Speaker 2>about real estate, but also taught me a lot about

0:57:49.200 --> 0:57:52.240
<v Speaker 2>being a woman in this business. She taught me how

0:57:52.280 --> 0:57:55.040
<v Speaker 2>to be a very tough negotiator. She taught me how

0:57:55.120 --> 0:57:59.480
<v Speaker 2>to kind of manage working in a man's world, and

0:57:59.560 --> 0:58:03.520
<v Speaker 2>she always expected a lot of me but also always

0:58:03.520 --> 0:58:07.640
<v Speaker 2>supported me. And I've tried to emulate some of the

0:58:07.680 --> 0:58:10.480
<v Speaker 2>way that she managed me and the way she managed

0:58:10.480 --> 0:58:13.280
<v Speaker 2>and led others. It really was very influential.

0:58:13.640 --> 0:58:16.920
<v Speaker 1>Huh. Very interesting. Let's talk about books. What are some

0:58:17.000 --> 0:58:18.880
<v Speaker 1>of your favorites? What are you reading right now?

0:58:19.560 --> 0:58:23.240
<v Speaker 2>Right now, I'm reading a book called Eligible by Curtis Sittenefeld,

0:58:23.320 --> 0:58:27.200
<v Speaker 2>who she writes a lot of you know, more pop culture,

0:58:27.280 --> 0:58:29.800
<v Speaker 2>I guess type books, but this happens to be a

0:58:29.840 --> 0:58:33.960
<v Speaker 2>modern take on Pride and Prejudice. So Pride and Prejudice

0:58:34.000 --> 0:58:36.840
<v Speaker 2>obviously was very tongue in cheek itself, and this is

0:58:37.160 --> 0:58:39.800
<v Speaker 2>a modern tongue in cheek version of that of, you know,

0:58:39.840 --> 0:58:42.560
<v Speaker 2>an overbearing mother trying to marry off her daughters, et cetera.

0:58:42.880 --> 0:58:45.240
<v Speaker 2>But I'm really enjoying that. I tend to read to escape.

0:58:45.760 --> 0:58:50.760
<v Speaker 2>And I am also just finished a book by Daniel Silva,

0:58:51.240 --> 0:58:53.160
<v Speaker 2>who has written like thirty two books, and I think

0:58:53.160 --> 0:58:56.200
<v Speaker 2>I've read every single one of them. And you know,

0:58:56.360 --> 0:59:01.240
<v Speaker 2>it's a series of spy novels and instead of the Cia,

0:59:01.320 --> 0:59:05.560
<v Speaker 2>it's the Mosad, and the protagonist is, in addition to

0:59:05.600 --> 0:59:08.880
<v Speaker 2>being an amazing masad agent. He's an art historian in

0:59:09.080 --> 0:59:12.000
<v Speaker 2>art and artist and art restorer, so it kind of

0:59:12.040 --> 0:59:14.720
<v Speaker 2>combines things. I'm very interested. When I was young, I

0:59:14.760 --> 0:59:17.320
<v Speaker 2>wanted to be a spy and I love art, So

0:59:17.400 --> 0:59:18.560
<v Speaker 2>for me, those are great books.

0:59:18.720 --> 0:59:21.200
<v Speaker 1>Huh really, what's the name of the silver Book?

0:59:22.000 --> 0:59:23.560
<v Speaker 2>This one I think is called The Collector?

0:59:24.120 --> 0:59:27.640
<v Speaker 1>Huh. Really interesting, And we're down to our final two questions.

0:59:27.800 --> 0:59:30.840
<v Speaker 1>What sort of advice would you give a recent college

0:59:30.880 --> 0:59:34.640
<v Speaker 1>grad interested in a career in real estate investing?

0:59:36.240 --> 0:59:38.840
<v Speaker 2>My greatest advice that I give to everyone is try

0:59:38.880 --> 0:59:41.880
<v Speaker 2>to do a little bit of everything. If you ultimately

0:59:41.920 --> 0:59:44.600
<v Speaker 2>want to specialize, if you ultimately want to only do

0:59:45.480 --> 0:59:49.080
<v Speaker 2>equity acquisitions, that's great. Don't make that decision when you're

0:59:49.080 --> 0:59:51.160
<v Speaker 2>twenty two or twenty three years old. Do a little

0:59:51.200 --> 0:59:53.760
<v Speaker 2>bit of debt, do a little bit of equity, do acquisitions,

0:59:53.800 --> 0:59:57.720
<v Speaker 2>do asset management, do dispositions, do portfolio management. I think

0:59:57.760 --> 1:00:01.200
<v Speaker 2>that especially when you hit a crisis, the most well

1:00:01.280 --> 1:00:05.000
<v Speaker 2>rounded real estate people are the ones who've done a lot,

1:00:05.040 --> 1:00:07.960
<v Speaker 2>and they're the most successful in a down environment. If

1:00:08.000 --> 1:00:11.200
<v Speaker 2>you think about it, when you might not you might

1:00:11.200 --> 1:00:14.520
<v Speaker 2>be an asset manager. But if you've never worked in debt.

1:00:14.800 --> 1:00:16.520
<v Speaker 2>How are you going to know how to do a

1:00:16.560 --> 1:00:19.880
<v Speaker 2>workout of your loan that now is in default. So

1:00:20.240 --> 1:00:23.120
<v Speaker 2>I just think do a little bit of everything. And

1:00:23.160 --> 1:00:26.400
<v Speaker 2>the one regret that I have is that so far

1:00:26.560 --> 1:00:28.800
<v Speaker 2>I've only worked in the US in terms of living

1:00:29.200 --> 1:00:32.800
<v Speaker 2>and working, and I wish I had had an excellent adventure,

1:00:33.080 --> 1:00:35.040
<v Speaker 2>you know, three years in London, three years in Powers,

1:00:35.080 --> 1:00:37.200
<v Speaker 2>something like that, and I would recommend that to all

1:00:37.240 --> 1:00:37.720
<v Speaker 2>young people.

1:00:38.120 --> 1:00:41.040
<v Speaker 1>Very interesting and our final question, what do you know

1:00:41.120 --> 1:00:44.040
<v Speaker 1>about the world of real estate investing today? You wish

1:00:44.040 --> 1:00:46.760
<v Speaker 1>you knew twenty five or so years ago when you

1:00:46.800 --> 1:00:47.880
<v Speaker 1>were first getting started.

1:00:49.240 --> 1:00:53.360
<v Speaker 2>I wish I knew that it would evolve in the

1:00:53.400 --> 1:00:56.000
<v Speaker 2>way that it has. I think that when I got

1:00:56.040 --> 1:00:58.840
<v Speaker 2>into the business, which is thirty five years ago, it

1:00:58.960 --> 1:01:05.960
<v Speaker 2>was far more opaque and less institutional, and I guess

1:01:06.000 --> 1:01:10.920
<v Speaker 2>that for some people that made it feel like, you know,

1:01:11.160 --> 1:01:14.320
<v Speaker 2>it was there were higher barriers to entry to being

1:01:14.320 --> 1:01:17.280
<v Speaker 2>in the business. But I actually really appreciate how much

1:01:17.360 --> 1:01:20.720
<v Speaker 2>more transparent the businesses and how much more institutional it is,

1:01:21.160 --> 1:01:24.360
<v Speaker 2>and the fact that it's more accessible to more people.

1:01:24.480 --> 1:01:26.320
<v Speaker 2>Used to just be only the wealthiest people in the

1:01:26.360 --> 1:01:29.680
<v Speaker 2>world could invest in institutional real estate. I know anybody can,

1:01:29.720 --> 1:01:30.760
<v Speaker 2>and I think that's terrific.

1:01:31.000 --> 1:01:34.320
<v Speaker 1>Huh, very very interesting. Thank you Kathy for being so

1:01:34.440 --> 1:01:38.000
<v Speaker 1>generous with your time. We have been speaking with Kathy Marcus.

1:01:38.280 --> 1:01:42.400
<v Speaker 1>She's co CEO and global Chief Operating Officer at Pgium

1:01:42.480 --> 1:01:46.800
<v Speaker 1>real Estate. If you enjoyed this conversation, check out any

1:01:46.840 --> 1:01:49.760
<v Speaker 1>of the previous five hundred or so we've done over

1:01:49.800 --> 1:01:54.840
<v Speaker 1>the past nine years. You can find those at Apple Podcasts, Spotify, YouTube,

1:01:55.160 --> 1:01:58.800
<v Speaker 1>wherever you find your favorite podcasts. Sign up from my

1:01:58.920 --> 1:02:03.040
<v Speaker 1>daily reading list Ridolts dot com. Follow me for however

1:02:03.120 --> 1:02:06.240
<v Speaker 1>much longer it continues to circle the drain at rid

1:02:06.280 --> 1:02:09.720
<v Speaker 1>Holts on Twitter. Follow all of the Bloomberg Family of

1:02:09.800 --> 1:02:14.160
<v Speaker 1>podcasts on Twitter at podcast I would be remiss if

1:02:14.200 --> 1:02:16.760
<v Speaker 1>I do not thank the crack team that helps put

1:02:16.760 --> 1:02:21.320
<v Speaker 1>these conversations together each week. My audio engineer is Rich

1:02:21.360 --> 1:02:27.200
<v Speaker 1>summani Attikavlbron is my project manager. Sean Russo is my researcher.

1:02:27.560 --> 1:02:32.000
<v Speaker 1>Analock is my producer. I'm Barry Riddholts. You've been listening

1:02:32.000 --> 1:02:36.560
<v Speaker 1>to Masters of Business on Bloomberg Radio.