WEBVTT - Robots Aren't Coming For Your Job. They're Already Here

0:00:00.600 --> 0:00:04.200
<v Speaker 1>From executive search to talent strategy, leadership development, rewards and

0:00:04.200 --> 0:00:06.880
<v Speaker 1>succession planning. Corn Fairy can help you realize the full

0:00:06.880 --> 0:00:09.879
<v Speaker 1>potential of your people so you can take your business

0:00:09.920 --> 0:00:12.520
<v Speaker 1>where it wants to go up. Learn more at corn

0:00:12.560 --> 0:00:16.000
<v Speaker 1>Ferry dot com slash up. There's a lot of talk

0:00:16.040 --> 0:00:19.079
<v Speaker 1>about how robots are coming to take our jobs, how

0:00:19.120 --> 0:00:21.959
<v Speaker 1>in the future near or far, our jobs will be

0:00:22.000 --> 0:00:27.280
<v Speaker 1>replaced by gleaming machines that will work tirelessly, precisely and efficiently.

0:00:27.800 --> 0:00:30.320
<v Speaker 1>But let me tell you something. The robots aren't coming

0:00:30.320 --> 0:00:34.280
<v Speaker 1>to take our jobs. They're already here. This is game plan.

0:00:45.960 --> 0:00:48.640
<v Speaker 1>I am Sam Grobert. I'm a writer at Bloomberg Business

0:00:48.640 --> 0:00:52.000
<v Speaker 1>Week magazine. I am joined here by We're back in Greenfield.

0:00:52.040 --> 0:00:54.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm a reporter at Bloomberg where I cover the workplace,

0:00:55.000 --> 0:00:58.160
<v Speaker 1>and today we're going to talk about automation and what

0:00:58.200 --> 0:01:01.400
<v Speaker 1>it means for all of us at work today, tomorrow,

0:01:01.520 --> 0:01:05.000
<v Speaker 1>and even beyond them. So, Becca, you've written a story

0:01:05.280 --> 0:01:08.280
<v Speaker 1>about this topic. Do you want to tell our dear

0:01:08.319 --> 0:01:10.679
<v Speaker 1>listeners a little bit about what you found. Yeah, So,

0:01:10.760 --> 0:01:15.039
<v Speaker 1>automation has been in the news recently because of our

0:01:15.120 --> 0:01:18.840
<v Speaker 1>President elect Donald Trump saying that he is going to

0:01:18.959 --> 0:01:21.840
<v Speaker 1>keep factory work here in the US and brokering that

0:01:21.880 --> 0:01:26.720
<v Speaker 1>dear deal with Carrier a plant in Indiana, that BLOCKBUSTERR deal, Yes,

0:01:26.760 --> 0:01:30.880
<v Speaker 1>saving a round a thousand jobs human jobs. This brought

0:01:30.959 --> 0:01:34.160
<v Speaker 1>up a conversation about automation. I know that as a

0:01:34.319 --> 0:01:36.880
<v Speaker 1>reader of business news, there are so many articles about

0:01:36.920 --> 0:01:39.039
<v Speaker 1>the robots are coming for your jobs, but I tend

0:01:39.040 --> 0:01:41.200
<v Speaker 1>to gloss over them because a lot of them are

0:01:41.400 --> 0:01:45.000
<v Speaker 1>just basically saying that and little else. Yeah, it's exactly,

0:01:45.000 --> 0:01:48.520
<v Speaker 1>it's not very relatable. But now in this case, people

0:01:48.560 --> 0:01:51.720
<v Speaker 1>are pointing out that often the jobs that have been

0:01:51.760 --> 0:01:55.720
<v Speaker 1>lost in the manufacturing industry aren't being replaced by cheaper

0:01:55.800 --> 0:02:00.440
<v Speaker 1>laborers in Mexico or China, but much cheaper robots who

0:02:00.600 --> 0:02:03.200
<v Speaker 1>are much more productive and do a lot of the

0:02:03.240 --> 0:02:06.240
<v Speaker 1>work that human used to do. So there are kind

0:02:06.240 --> 0:02:09.839
<v Speaker 1>of some startling statistics about this. If I may, oh,

0:02:09.919 --> 0:02:13.119
<v Speaker 1>you may, indeed, I want to hear them. So America

0:02:13.160 --> 0:02:16.359
<v Speaker 1>has lost more than seven million factory jobs since manufacturing

0:02:16.360 --> 0:02:20.760
<v Speaker 1>employment peaked in nineteen seventy nine, but we now produce

0:02:20.919 --> 0:02:23.840
<v Speaker 1>far more. We've more than doubled our production in the

0:02:23.919 --> 0:02:29.440
<v Speaker 1>same time span. Right, so making more stuff with fewer people. Right,

0:02:29.600 --> 0:02:33.400
<v Speaker 1>So America is the second biggest manufacturing producer in the

0:02:33.440 --> 0:02:37.360
<v Speaker 1>world after China. And another study that came out last

0:02:37.440 --> 0:02:40.639
<v Speaker 1>year found that trade, which is the big Donald Trump

0:02:40.680 --> 0:02:44.080
<v Speaker 1>talking point, accounted for about of America's lost factory jobs,

0:02:44.080 --> 0:02:46.720
<v Speaker 1>which is you know, has been accelerated in the last

0:02:47.040 --> 0:02:49.639
<v Speaker 1>decade and people really do feel that, and obviously that's

0:02:49.639 --> 0:02:52.240
<v Speaker 1>why his message did resonate with so many people. But

0:02:53.240 --> 0:02:55.760
<v Speaker 1>of those jobs were taken by robots. And if you

0:02:55.800 --> 0:02:57.639
<v Speaker 1>even think about it, there was a story out in

0:02:57.680 --> 0:03:00.080
<v Speaker 1>the l A Times by our former colleague Natalie at

0:03:00.160 --> 0:03:04.280
<v Speaker 1>Drop who wrote about warehouse jobs. So warehouse jobs have

0:03:04.400 --> 0:03:07.920
<v Speaker 1>brought a lot of human jobs to the US, but

0:03:08.480 --> 0:03:11.040
<v Speaker 1>robots are quickly taking a lot of that work. I

0:03:11.080 --> 0:03:15.120
<v Speaker 1>remember a few years ago Amazon had this Kiva robot, right,

0:03:15.320 --> 0:03:17.639
<v Speaker 1>I've seen the Kiva robot in action. Actually, I was

0:03:17.680 --> 0:03:21.119
<v Speaker 1>in Devon's, Massachusetts once at a company called Quiet Logistics,

0:03:21.520 --> 0:03:23.960
<v Speaker 1>which has the Kiva robots themselves. In the way that

0:03:24.000 --> 0:03:27.000
<v Speaker 1>the warehouse was organized is there was one zone for

0:03:27.040 --> 0:03:29.920
<v Speaker 1>the humans and then there was another zone that you

0:03:29.919 --> 0:03:33.520
<v Speaker 1>didn't go into for the robots. Because the robots are

0:03:33.520 --> 0:03:36.640
<v Speaker 1>moving around rather quickly and they're carrying very heavy things,

0:03:36.760 --> 0:03:38.960
<v Speaker 1>and so it wouldn't be very safe to go into

0:03:39.000 --> 0:03:40.680
<v Speaker 1>the robot zone. But the idea was that there was

0:03:40.680 --> 0:03:42.880
<v Speaker 1>a bit of a division of labor there. The robots

0:03:43.000 --> 0:03:46.920
<v Speaker 1>would go and retrieve items from way back in the warehouse,

0:03:47.000 --> 0:03:50.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, an eighth of a mile away, and bring

0:03:50.360 --> 0:03:54.600
<v Speaker 1>them to a human who could then box it, packaging

0:03:54.880 --> 0:03:57.480
<v Speaker 1>label something a robot is not as good at yet,

0:03:57.680 --> 0:04:00.600
<v Speaker 1>not yet yet, that's the word. That's what my story

0:04:00.720 --> 0:04:03.720
<v Speaker 1>is about. It's about manufacturing in jobs that we can

0:04:03.720 --> 0:04:06.720
<v Speaker 1>see robots doing. But robots are coming, as you mentioned,

0:04:07.000 --> 0:04:10.040
<v Speaker 1>for other jobs that we never really thought about already.

0:04:10.080 --> 0:04:15.160
<v Speaker 1>Already there are robots replacing financial analysts, for example, and

0:04:15.160 --> 0:04:17.120
<v Speaker 1>these are robots more in the digital sense. They're not

0:04:17.520 --> 0:04:21.760
<v Speaker 1>physical robots, but they are bots in manipulating data. Yeah,

0:04:21.760 --> 0:04:23.240
<v Speaker 1>and so what are we going to do when all

0:04:23.279 --> 0:04:26.000
<v Speaker 1>those people are mad about their jobs being gone? Or

0:04:26.040 --> 0:04:27.880
<v Speaker 1>what will their jobs look like are they're going to

0:04:27.960 --> 0:04:30.520
<v Speaker 1>be gone? Those are some of the questions that I've had,

0:04:30.920 --> 0:04:32.599
<v Speaker 1>and then I try to answer in the story. Well,

0:04:32.760 --> 0:04:35.279
<v Speaker 1>I do suggest that everybody go and read that story.

0:04:35.320 --> 0:04:37.400
<v Speaker 1>But while you're listening here, we are going to be

0:04:37.480 --> 0:04:41.000
<v Speaker 1>joined by someone who can help answer those questions right

0:04:41.000 --> 0:04:55.400
<v Speaker 1>here in your headphones. We are joined here by Professor

0:04:55.480 --> 0:04:59.799
<v Speaker 1>David Demming from Harvard's Graduate School of Education. Hi David,

0:05:00.040 --> 0:05:02.599
<v Speaker 1>Hi Sam, how are you great? Thank you. I was wondering,

0:05:02.800 --> 0:05:05.320
<v Speaker 1>as we're talking here about the role of robots and

0:05:05.480 --> 0:05:07.719
<v Speaker 1>labor and how we feel about them coming to take

0:05:07.720 --> 0:05:11.280
<v Speaker 1>our jobs and so forth, could you possibly give us

0:05:11.320 --> 0:05:14.480
<v Speaker 1>a brief description of the current state of the art

0:05:14.880 --> 0:05:18.080
<v Speaker 1>of robotics in the workplace, Like where are they most prevalent,

0:05:18.600 --> 0:05:21.360
<v Speaker 1>what are they doing well, what can't they do well yet,

0:05:21.480 --> 0:05:24.279
<v Speaker 1>and what needs to happen for that to change? Sure? So,

0:05:24.320 --> 0:05:27.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think robotics are pretty prevalent in the workplace,

0:05:27.240 --> 0:05:31.520
<v Speaker 1>but mostly in manufacturing. So um. One of the things

0:05:31.520 --> 0:05:33.359
<v Speaker 1>that's been in the news a lot recently is the

0:05:33.440 --> 0:05:36.680
<v Speaker 1>decline of manufacturing jobs. And so you might think that

0:05:36.720 --> 0:05:39.160
<v Speaker 1>manufacturing itself is in decline, but actually that's not true.

0:05:39.200 --> 0:05:41.920
<v Speaker 1>Manufacturing output has continued to grow. This is actually sort

0:05:41.920 --> 0:05:44.000
<v Speaker 1>of a boom time for manufacturing output. It's just that

0:05:44.000 --> 0:05:47.640
<v Speaker 1>it's robots doing the job instead of humans. Robots are

0:05:47.680 --> 0:05:50.320
<v Speaker 1>also prevalent in other sectors of the economy. But the

0:05:50.320 --> 0:05:53.680
<v Speaker 1>thing that robots and machines and computers really still can't

0:05:53.720 --> 0:05:57.400
<v Speaker 1>do very well at all is socially interact with people

0:05:57.520 --> 0:06:00.600
<v Speaker 1>or with each other. Alright, So so social reaction just

0:06:00.720 --> 0:06:05.640
<v Speaker 1>means the non routine, hard to script out process of

0:06:05.680 --> 0:06:09.200
<v Speaker 1>having a conversation with another human being, figuring out if

0:06:09.240 --> 0:06:10.719
<v Speaker 1>you and I are going to work together on a team,

0:06:10.720 --> 0:06:11.839
<v Speaker 1>what are you going to do? What am I going

0:06:11.880 --> 0:06:15.520
<v Speaker 1>to do? Being flexible, being empathetic. That's something that at

0:06:15.560 --> 0:06:17.840
<v Speaker 1>least right now, we still don't have a good way

0:06:17.880 --> 0:06:21.160
<v Speaker 1>to program to automate, and I definitely want to get

0:06:21.200 --> 0:06:24.520
<v Speaker 1>to that. But there's this paper that you site, and

0:06:24.560 --> 0:06:29.159
<v Speaker 1>I've seen a lot about how cent of total US

0:06:29.200 --> 0:06:31.760
<v Speaker 1>employment is at high risk of automation over the next

0:06:31.880 --> 0:06:35.200
<v Speaker 1>one to two decades. So you're saying manufacturing work has

0:06:35.240 --> 0:06:39.839
<v Speaker 1>already been gutted. Basically, what is the next frontier of automation.

0:06:40.680 --> 0:06:42.640
<v Speaker 1>That's a great question. I mean, I guess it's really

0:06:42.640 --> 0:06:44.440
<v Speaker 1>hard to predict the future. But I think one of

0:06:44.480 --> 0:06:46.799
<v Speaker 1>the reasons why you see a lot of um newspaper

0:06:46.880 --> 0:06:49.400
<v Speaker 1>articles that I would call our other people also would

0:06:49.440 --> 0:06:53.080
<v Speaker 1>call automation anxiety kind of pieces, it's because you see

0:06:53.120 --> 0:06:56.440
<v Speaker 1>automation increasingly UM grabbing onto what we might think of

0:06:56.520 --> 0:06:59.279
<v Speaker 1>is white color or professional work. So one example is

0:06:59.600 --> 0:07:01.839
<v Speaker 1>ecovery in the legal world. If you're if you're an

0:07:01.839 --> 0:07:03.920
<v Speaker 1>attorney or you have friend who attorneys already know about this.

0:07:03.920 --> 0:07:06.000
<v Speaker 1>This is you used to be an attorney's job to

0:07:06.200 --> 0:07:09.560
<v Speaker 1>comb through reams of paper looking for bits of information

0:07:09.600 --> 0:07:12.120
<v Speaker 1>that might be relevant to a case or to a deposition.

0:07:12.160 --> 0:07:14.440
<v Speaker 1>Now we've got software to do that, and so that's

0:07:14.480 --> 0:07:18.160
<v Speaker 1>kind of been really great for UM for legal work.

0:07:18.240 --> 0:07:20.920
<v Speaker 1>It's made legal work much more productive, but it's putting

0:07:21.000 --> 0:07:22.760
<v Speaker 1>lawyers out of work. And you see some of that

0:07:22.800 --> 0:07:25.800
<v Speaker 1>with automation of maybe you guys know this short kind

0:07:25.800 --> 0:07:29.240
<v Speaker 1>of newspaper articles. Fact based articles are being automated, are

0:07:29.240 --> 0:07:33.400
<v Speaker 1>automatically produced recaps of sports games, things like that. And

0:07:33.440 --> 0:07:35.120
<v Speaker 1>so when you start to see that happen, those are

0:07:35.120 --> 0:07:37.720
<v Speaker 1>the types of changes that are affecting the people that

0:07:37.800 --> 0:07:39.880
<v Speaker 1>we all know, people that journalists know, And so I

0:07:39.880 --> 0:07:41.760
<v Speaker 1>think you see a lot more articles about it. But

0:07:41.840 --> 0:07:44.680
<v Speaker 1>I think, in fact, the progress of automation has been

0:07:44.920 --> 0:07:47.840
<v Speaker 1>pretty continuous over the past several decades. David. When I

0:07:47.880 --> 0:07:51.800
<v Speaker 1>think of manufacturing robots, I I suppose, like many people

0:07:51.920 --> 0:07:56.040
<v Speaker 1>imagine those big sort of arms in a say auto plant, right,

0:07:56.280 --> 0:07:59.560
<v Speaker 1>kind of assembling a car body. Um, those have been

0:07:59.600 --> 0:08:03.200
<v Speaker 1>around for some decades now in one form or another.

0:08:03.920 --> 0:08:07.320
<v Speaker 1>What kinds of robots are being built or will be

0:08:07.360 --> 0:08:12.520
<v Speaker 1>built that can work presumably alongside humans? What? What? What

0:08:12.560 --> 0:08:14.960
<v Speaker 1>do they start to look like? Yeah? Exactly. So when

0:08:14.960 --> 0:08:16.720
<v Speaker 1>you when you think of robots in your mind, you

0:08:16.720 --> 0:08:20.120
<v Speaker 1>have this image, at least I do, growing up in

0:08:20.120 --> 0:08:22.400
<v Speaker 1>the in the eighties. I think of like the Transformers, right,

0:08:22.520 --> 0:08:25.760
<v Speaker 1>stuff like that. But actually, automation is not just robots,

0:08:25.840 --> 0:08:28.920
<v Speaker 1>is any process that can be scripted out in advance.

0:08:29.240 --> 0:08:31.840
<v Speaker 1>And so you know, you don't think of things like

0:08:32.080 --> 0:08:35.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, Siri or basically um computer programs that

0:08:35.960 --> 0:08:38.720
<v Speaker 1>can like maybe customer service, like if you call a

0:08:38.760 --> 0:08:40.959
<v Speaker 1>company and you want to get help with your credit card,

0:08:41.000 --> 0:08:43.080
<v Speaker 1>your credit card gets stolen or you want to call

0:08:43.120 --> 0:08:45.480
<v Speaker 1>and complain. You don't think of the voice on the

0:08:45.480 --> 0:08:47.360
<v Speaker 1>other end that's not a human as being a robot.

0:08:47.440 --> 0:08:51.800
<v Speaker 1>But that's actually the same manifestation of robotics, meaning scripting

0:08:51.800 --> 0:08:54.920
<v Speaker 1>out what used to be human performance in a predictable way.

0:08:55.040 --> 0:08:57.120
<v Speaker 1>So I think that's been going on for a long time.

0:08:57.160 --> 0:08:59.959
<v Speaker 1>Those things are also robots in some sense, and you're

0:09:00.000 --> 0:09:02.080
<v Speaker 1>going to see more of that, robots being more and

0:09:02.120 --> 0:09:05.320
<v Speaker 1>more human like. One of the more modern expressions of

0:09:05.320 --> 0:09:09.560
<v Speaker 1>that are these messenger based bots. Yes, you can chat

0:09:09.559 --> 0:09:11.360
<v Speaker 1>bots that you can like say I want to flight

0:09:11.440 --> 0:09:13.840
<v Speaker 1>to Florida, and it'll be like, I see that you

0:09:13.880 --> 0:09:16.480
<v Speaker 1>want to flight to Florida. These are your options. I'll

0:09:16.520 --> 0:09:18.400
<v Speaker 1>take that one. And then it makes a joke about

0:09:18.400 --> 0:09:22.000
<v Speaker 1>Florida or something. Right. Yeah, they're path yeah, they they're

0:09:22.000 --> 0:09:23.559
<v Speaker 1>getting picked here all the time. And that's the thing

0:09:23.600 --> 0:09:26.000
<v Speaker 1>that's kind of the at least of my understanding the

0:09:26.000 --> 0:09:29.319
<v Speaker 1>frontier is we're getting better at natural language processing. You

0:09:29.360 --> 0:09:31.720
<v Speaker 1>think about think about Sirie. Okay. I don't know how

0:09:31.760 --> 0:09:33.720
<v Speaker 1>much you guys, you Siri, but you have to say

0:09:33.720 --> 0:09:35.280
<v Speaker 1>things in a certain way to Siri to get the

0:09:35.320 --> 0:09:37.760
<v Speaker 1>kind of response. Otherwise you get the you know, searching

0:09:37.760 --> 0:09:41.440
<v Speaker 1>the web for right. Yeah, and that's Sirie being not

0:09:41.559 --> 0:09:44.160
<v Speaker 1>understanding natural language. Right. So I'll give you an example. Um,

0:09:44.440 --> 0:09:46.920
<v Speaker 1>my children, maybe as many children do, love to play

0:09:46.960 --> 0:09:50.120
<v Speaker 1>with my phone and with Siri, and so they were

0:09:50.160 --> 0:09:53.400
<v Speaker 1>asking Siri, Sirie, what color is my water bottle? Okay,

0:09:53.400 --> 0:09:56.520
<v Speaker 1>which Siri could actually has the technology to figure that out.

0:09:56.520 --> 0:09:58.240
<v Speaker 1>Siri could turn its camera into the water bottle and

0:09:58.240 --> 0:10:00.480
<v Speaker 1>say your water bottles red. But series you stupid to

0:10:00.480 --> 0:10:02.760
<v Speaker 1>figure that out? So Siri says, searching on the web

0:10:02.800 --> 0:10:04.760
<v Speaker 1>for what color is my water bottle? But if you

0:10:04.760 --> 0:10:07.240
<v Speaker 1>ask Siri, what's thirty seven times fifty nine, as I

0:10:07.320 --> 0:10:09.760
<v Speaker 1>encourage my daughter to do, Syria can do that right away.

0:10:09.760 --> 0:10:11.120
<v Speaker 1>So I said to her, why do you think, Siri?

0:10:11.200 --> 0:10:13.240
<v Speaker 1>Can you know this is a cognitive process. It's really

0:10:13.360 --> 0:10:15.480
<v Speaker 1>most people can't just do thirty seven times fifty nine

0:10:15.480 --> 0:10:18.240
<v Speaker 1>in their head. Syria can do it instantaneously. And that's

0:10:18.280 --> 0:10:21.080
<v Speaker 1>because the problem space is defined. You have a database

0:10:21.080 --> 0:10:23.000
<v Speaker 1>where you say, these are all the multiplications. You know,

0:10:23.040 --> 0:10:25.120
<v Speaker 1>do this, and Syrie can do that really quickly. But

0:10:25.280 --> 0:10:27.720
<v Speaker 1>common sense tasks like telling you what color your water

0:10:27.720 --> 0:10:30.040
<v Speaker 1>bottle is, which are very simple and natural for humans

0:10:30.120 --> 0:10:33.640
<v Speaker 1>to do, is really hard. Actually, a program up happens

0:10:33.640 --> 0:10:36.320
<v Speaker 1>when the power and potential of every employee and leader

0:10:36.360 --> 0:10:39.600
<v Speaker 1>in your workforce is released, and corn Ferry can get

0:10:39.640 --> 0:10:44.319
<v Speaker 1>you there by aligning your people to your strategy, attracting, developing, engaging,

0:10:44.360 --> 0:10:47.720
<v Speaker 1>and rewarding them to reach new heights with corn Ferry.

0:10:47.880 --> 0:10:50.920
<v Speaker 1>You get a partner who truly understands people, leadership and

0:10:50.920 --> 0:10:53.520
<v Speaker 1>the new landscape of work, a partner who knows how

0:10:53.520 --> 0:10:56.600
<v Speaker 1>to take your business up. Learn more at corn Ferry

0:10:56.640 --> 0:11:00.440
<v Speaker 1>dot com slash up. So all of us talk about

0:11:00.520 --> 0:11:04.600
<v Speaker 1>robots taking our jobs is scary, but I found some

0:11:04.640 --> 0:11:07.880
<v Speaker 1>comfort in your working paper the growing importance of social

0:11:07.920 --> 0:11:11.280
<v Speaker 1>skills in the labor market, probably as somebody who uses

0:11:11.320 --> 0:11:15.040
<v Speaker 1>social skills in her job a lot, but you found

0:11:15.080 --> 0:11:17.000
<v Speaker 1>that there are some skills that are going to be

0:11:17.080 --> 0:11:19.920
<v Speaker 1>valued in the labor market because robots can't do them.

0:11:20.320 --> 0:11:23.120
<v Speaker 1>So can you talk about that and maybe what kinds

0:11:23.160 --> 0:11:26.280
<v Speaker 1>of jobs are the safest? Sure? So, the way you

0:11:26.320 --> 0:11:29.440
<v Speaker 1>want to think about how technological progress affects the labor

0:11:29.480 --> 0:11:31.840
<v Speaker 1>market is that there's really two things going on, and

0:11:31.880 --> 0:11:33.480
<v Speaker 1>we tend to focus on one of them, which is

0:11:34.160 --> 0:11:38.719
<v Speaker 1>how technology takes away jobs what economists would say substitutes

0:11:38.920 --> 0:11:42.079
<v Speaker 1>away for for human labor. So you've got robots or

0:11:42.280 --> 0:11:45.680
<v Speaker 1>computers substituting away for human labor, and that's the scary side.

0:11:46.160 --> 0:11:48.360
<v Speaker 1>But there's a friendly side too, and that is it

0:11:48.480 --> 0:11:52.440
<v Speaker 1>also makes people who aren't substituted away much more productive. Right, So,

0:11:52.480 --> 0:11:55.880
<v Speaker 1>for example, you used to have to do complex mathematical

0:11:55.920 --> 0:11:58.400
<v Speaker 1>calculations by hand. You might hire an accountant to do this.

0:11:58.720 --> 0:12:00.440
<v Speaker 1>Let's say you own a small business. Now you've got

0:12:00.480 --> 0:12:03.480
<v Speaker 1>tools like Microsoft Excel that allow that process to be

0:12:03.520 --> 0:12:06.400
<v Speaker 1>automated and very quick and very customizable. Right, so we

0:12:06.440 --> 0:12:08.440
<v Speaker 1>focus on the putting the account and out of business,

0:12:08.440 --> 0:12:10.080
<v Speaker 1>but the other side of it, if you make business

0:12:10.080 --> 0:12:13.560
<v Speaker 1>decisions for a living, you're much more productive. So the

0:12:13.679 --> 0:12:16.880
<v Speaker 1>lesson that we've learned from the study of how technological

0:12:16.960 --> 0:12:19.920
<v Speaker 1>change affects labor markets is that anything that is not

0:12:20.040 --> 0:12:24.480
<v Speaker 1>directly replaced by technology is generally complimented by it, which

0:12:24.559 --> 0:12:26.920
<v Speaker 1>is an economist way of saying makes you more productive.

0:12:27.480 --> 0:12:29.120
<v Speaker 1>So you have to look at the labor market and say,

0:12:29.160 --> 0:12:32.000
<v Speaker 1>what are the things that technology still can't do very well?

0:12:32.320 --> 0:12:35.240
<v Speaker 1>And those things, those tasks, those job tasks are going

0:12:35.240 --> 0:12:37.040
<v Speaker 1>to be made more productive and thus going to be

0:12:37.040 --> 0:12:39.800
<v Speaker 1>more important. And that's kind of the thesis of the paper,

0:12:40.200 --> 0:12:42.400
<v Speaker 1>which is that, look, at least right now, we don't

0:12:42.400 --> 0:12:45.280
<v Speaker 1>know about the future, but right now, machines can't have

0:12:45.400 --> 0:12:47.920
<v Speaker 1>an unscripted conversation within a human being or with each

0:12:47.960 --> 0:12:51.040
<v Speaker 1>other in any kind of meaningful way. They can't socially interact,

0:12:51.080 --> 0:12:53.680
<v Speaker 1>they can't work on a team, they're very inflexible. And

0:12:53.720 --> 0:12:56.200
<v Speaker 1>so people who can do that are going to be

0:12:56.240 --> 0:12:59.120
<v Speaker 1>more valuable in the workplace than they were before because

0:12:59.160 --> 0:13:01.320
<v Speaker 1>we've got technology to do all the other things you

0:13:01.360 --> 0:13:03.360
<v Speaker 1>want to hear a really left field example of what

0:13:03.360 --> 0:13:06.040
<v Speaker 1>you're talking about. Okay, So I was done in Florida

0:13:06.160 --> 0:13:09.640
<v Speaker 1>last year at Florida Atlantic University, and there's a team

0:13:09.679 --> 0:13:14.400
<v Speaker 1>of engineers who are developing these um robot boats, basically

0:13:14.840 --> 0:13:20.960
<v Speaker 1>water based drones that can inspect bridge pilings underwater. And

0:13:21.000 --> 0:13:22.880
<v Speaker 1>this was a job that people used to have to

0:13:22.920 --> 0:13:25.880
<v Speaker 1>do themselves. They had to go underwater with a diving

0:13:26.000 --> 0:13:29.160
<v Speaker 1>rig and it was actually pretty dangerous and it took

0:13:29.160 --> 0:13:31.200
<v Speaker 1>a really long time, and you can only send out,

0:13:31.360 --> 0:13:34.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, one person at a time. And now what

0:13:34.160 --> 0:13:37.559
<v Speaker 1>they're doing is the robots are going around and constantly

0:13:37.679 --> 0:13:40.600
<v Speaker 1>just floating around these bridges and looking at them underwater

0:13:40.640 --> 0:13:42.920
<v Speaker 1>with their cameras. The people who used to have to

0:13:42.920 --> 0:13:46.520
<v Speaker 1>go into the water stay on land at a place

0:13:46.520 --> 0:13:49.160
<v Speaker 1>where they're watching what the robots are looking at and

0:13:49.240 --> 0:13:52.040
<v Speaker 1>making decisions about, oh, now we have to go fix that.

0:13:52.880 --> 0:13:55.880
<v Speaker 1>So their job is safer, and they actually get to

0:13:56.040 --> 0:13:59.959
<v Speaker 1>cover more territory because the robots don't ever stop work.

0:14:00.840 --> 0:14:02.720
<v Speaker 1>You have to ask yourself. The U is a great example.

0:14:02.760 --> 0:14:05.680
<v Speaker 1>You ask the question, why don't we automate the final step,

0:14:05.840 --> 0:14:08.280
<v Speaker 1>which is telling the you know, telling the robots what

0:14:08.280 --> 0:14:11.360
<v Speaker 1>to do once they get there. It's because it's unpredictable, right,

0:14:11.440 --> 0:14:13.920
<v Speaker 1>and so people are just very easily and naturally able

0:14:13.960 --> 0:14:15.440
<v Speaker 1>to say, oh, look, I see the problem, let's do

0:14:15.440 --> 0:14:17.640
<v Speaker 1>this instead. But if you're going to write a kind

0:14:17.679 --> 0:14:19.560
<v Speaker 1>of a script or a computer program to do that,

0:14:19.640 --> 0:14:21.680
<v Speaker 1>you have to be able to anticipate anything that might

0:14:21.720 --> 0:14:25.120
<v Speaker 1>possibly happen. And some situations are really uncertain, and people

0:14:25.120 --> 0:14:28.400
<v Speaker 1>are still much better than machines at reacting to uncertainty.

0:14:28.800 --> 0:14:31.440
<v Speaker 1>So these skills, I've seen them called a couple of

0:14:31.440 --> 0:14:36.840
<v Speaker 1>things like empathy, labor, non cognitive skills, social skills, social labor.

0:14:37.440 --> 0:14:39.720
<v Speaker 1>They also are happening in high skilled labor. I now

0:14:39.720 --> 0:14:43.360
<v Speaker 1>we're talking a lot about manufacturing and transportation. Do you

0:14:43.440 --> 0:14:46.640
<v Speaker 1>think that our education system is pushing these enough? Are

0:14:46.680 --> 0:14:49.800
<v Speaker 1>we teaching this well enough? Are these are this? Is

0:14:49.840 --> 0:14:52.040
<v Speaker 1>this valued enough? Because I get a sense I'm just

0:14:52.080 --> 0:14:54.720
<v Speaker 1>going to say that it's not because we're hearing so

0:14:54.800 --> 0:14:58.280
<v Speaker 1>much about the push for STEM, and you know how

0:14:58.320 --> 0:15:00.400
<v Speaker 1>everybody needs to be a coder and learned to code,

0:15:00.840 --> 0:15:05.720
<v Speaker 1>but you never hear people raising their hand for learn

0:15:05.800 --> 0:15:09.320
<v Speaker 1>to be more empathetic. It's a great question, um, and

0:15:09.320 --> 0:15:10.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm glad you brought up STEM because it does tie

0:15:11.000 --> 0:15:13.120
<v Speaker 1>into that. You do see a lot of discussion of

0:15:13.200 --> 0:15:15.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, we need more STEM jobs, and I think

0:15:15.840 --> 0:15:17.960
<v Speaker 1>that is not untrue. The way I would say it

0:15:18.040 --> 0:15:21.240
<v Speaker 1>is that you want people to have technical skills because

0:15:21.280 --> 0:15:23.520
<v Speaker 1>they need to understand how the machines work and how

0:15:23.560 --> 0:15:26.120
<v Speaker 1>things are happening under the hood, so to speak. But

0:15:26.200 --> 0:15:28.200
<v Speaker 1>you also want them to have these social skills. It's

0:15:28.200 --> 0:15:30.000
<v Speaker 1>just not enough to have one and not the other.

0:15:30.480 --> 0:15:33.000
<v Speaker 1>I would predict, for example, that twenty years from now,

0:15:33.320 --> 0:15:35.840
<v Speaker 1>you'll see many fewer jobs where you just write software

0:15:35.880 --> 0:15:37.520
<v Speaker 1>code all day, but you'll see a lot more jobs

0:15:37.560 --> 0:15:39.200
<v Speaker 1>where you have to do something like that as part

0:15:39.200 --> 0:15:40.760
<v Speaker 1>of many other things you do on the job. So

0:15:40.760 --> 0:15:44.240
<v Speaker 1>I think the workplace is just becoming more integrated in

0:15:44.320 --> 0:15:46.000
<v Speaker 1>terms of which task keep to do in and less

0:15:46.040 --> 0:15:48.760
<v Speaker 1>predictable in part because of this change that anything that's

0:15:48.760 --> 0:15:51.560
<v Speaker 1>predictable and and and can be scripted, we can automate,

0:15:51.880 --> 0:15:54.040
<v Speaker 1>and so you need people to be able to um

0:15:54.080 --> 0:15:56.600
<v Speaker 1>flexibly rotate between many different things in a kind of

0:15:56.680 --> 0:16:00.240
<v Speaker 1>unpredictable way. And so I talked about this in the paper.

0:16:00.240 --> 0:16:01.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean there's a kind of way to formalize this,

0:16:01.880 --> 0:16:03.800
<v Speaker 1>but essentially it's like, look, if you don't have any

0:16:03.800 --> 0:16:05.600
<v Speaker 1>technical skills, you don't know how to do anything, then

0:16:05.600 --> 0:16:08.400
<v Speaker 1>the fact that you're you have good social skills is

0:16:08.400 --> 0:16:10.520
<v Speaker 1>not that useful actually, because there are a lot of

0:16:10.520 --> 0:16:11.800
<v Speaker 1>people who can do that. There are a lot of

0:16:11.800 --> 0:16:13.800
<v Speaker 1>people who can who can empathize with others. But what

0:16:13.840 --> 0:16:15.720
<v Speaker 1>there aren't a lot of people who can do is

0:16:15.920 --> 0:16:19.120
<v Speaker 1>people who have the technical skills who understand how everything

0:16:19.200 --> 0:16:22.000
<v Speaker 1>is working. But also those people kind of tend to

0:16:22.040 --> 0:16:24.560
<v Speaker 1>be people, tend to be one or the other. And

0:16:24.600 --> 0:16:27.160
<v Speaker 1>so I think what you see very clearly in the data,

0:16:27.400 --> 0:16:28.960
<v Speaker 1>and what I talked about in the paper is that

0:16:29.000 --> 0:16:31.960
<v Speaker 1>you see increasing labor market returns for people who have

0:16:32.400 --> 0:16:35.000
<v Speaker 1>both types of skills what kondom is often called cognitive

0:16:35.040 --> 0:16:37.680
<v Speaker 1>skills or hard skills and soft skills or social skills.

0:16:37.960 --> 0:16:40.320
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't be doing my job as a business journalist

0:16:40.400 --> 0:16:43.880
<v Speaker 1>if I didn't refer to Steve Jobs probably one severy

0:16:43.920 --> 0:16:46.600
<v Speaker 1>week or so. But what you're talking about really reminds

0:16:46.600 --> 0:16:49.200
<v Speaker 1>me of one of his keynotes where he said that

0:16:49.480 --> 0:16:52.840
<v Speaker 1>the key to his success or Apple's success was the

0:16:52.880 --> 0:16:57.360
<v Speaker 1>marriage of technology and the liberal arts. That it couldn't

0:16:57.400 --> 0:17:00.640
<v Speaker 1>just be numbers and engineering, but it also had to

0:17:00.720 --> 0:17:04.960
<v Speaker 1>have the inspiration and the artistic and cultural influences of

0:17:05.040 --> 0:17:07.439
<v Speaker 1>literature and music and all these other things. And so

0:17:07.480 --> 0:17:11.880
<v Speaker 1>the two brought together is what really makes for interesting products,

0:17:11.880 --> 0:17:14.720
<v Speaker 1>interesting workers, and so forth. Uh, you can't just have

0:17:14.800 --> 0:17:17.199
<v Speaker 1>the one. I think that's right, and I think what

0:17:17.240 --> 0:17:20.639
<v Speaker 1>he's really talking about is the marrying of human creativity

0:17:20.680 --> 0:17:22.919
<v Speaker 1>with all the things that are possible with technology. You know,

0:17:22.960 --> 0:17:25.320
<v Speaker 1>you can't just if you're just training yourself, or we're

0:17:25.320 --> 0:17:27.520
<v Speaker 1>training students in schools to just be like the machines,

0:17:27.960 --> 0:17:29.440
<v Speaker 1>then we're not gonna be able to make full use

0:17:29.480 --> 0:17:32.600
<v Speaker 1>of these technological advances. It's really putting the two together

0:17:32.760 --> 0:17:36.040
<v Speaker 1>that's so important. David, thank you so much. This has

0:17:36.080 --> 0:17:39.520
<v Speaker 1>been a really eye opening conversation. Really appreciate it, my pleasure.

0:17:39.520 --> 0:17:50.199
<v Speaker 1>It's great to talk to you guys. So David scared

0:17:50.359 --> 0:17:53.359
<v Speaker 1>us obviously because the robots are coming for all the jobs.

0:17:53.400 --> 0:17:56.520
<v Speaker 1>He even mentioned journalism right. One thing that we didn't

0:17:56.520 --> 0:17:58.040
<v Speaker 1>get to talk to him about that I thought was

0:17:58.119 --> 0:18:00.080
<v Speaker 1>interesting that he and I had talked about when I

0:18:00.119 --> 0:18:02.560
<v Speaker 1>talked to him for my story was about the gender

0:18:02.600 --> 0:18:06.320
<v Speaker 1>component in all of this. Manufacturing obviously tends to be

0:18:06.359 --> 0:18:11.080
<v Speaker 1>a very male dominated field, and a lot of empathy

0:18:11.160 --> 0:18:14.480
<v Speaker 1>jobs that are really growing in this country tend to

0:18:14.480 --> 0:18:21.080
<v Speaker 1>be female dominated jobs like nursing, home health AIDS, physical therapists, teaching,

0:18:21.840 --> 0:18:23.560
<v Speaker 1>and these are skills that he's saying are going to

0:18:23.600 --> 0:18:27.040
<v Speaker 1>be valued more and more. But I do wonder a

0:18:27.119 --> 0:18:30.159
<v Speaker 1>lot of them aren't very well paid now, and you

0:18:30.160 --> 0:18:32.040
<v Speaker 1>still don't see a lot of men going into nursing,

0:18:32.040 --> 0:18:34.800
<v Speaker 1>even though it's a high growth field that does pay well.

0:18:35.280 --> 0:18:37.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm wondering how that will change, and if more men

0:18:37.960 --> 0:18:40.480
<v Speaker 1>do go into these fields, that they will become higher paying,

0:18:40.520 --> 0:18:43.760
<v Speaker 1>because that has happened historically. Once men go into a field,

0:18:43.800 --> 0:18:46.040
<v Speaker 1>it tends to be more like we need some more

0:18:46.040 --> 0:18:48.960
<v Speaker 1>money here. This is ridiculous. Which happened with computer programming

0:18:49.040 --> 0:18:51.359
<v Speaker 1>is one big example. But I remember there was a

0:18:51.359 --> 0:18:54.199
<v Speaker 1>study that I cite that talks about um how janitors

0:18:54.280 --> 0:18:57.679
<v Speaker 1>make a lot more than house cleaners, for example, or

0:18:57.880 --> 0:19:01.120
<v Speaker 1>HR people tend to be female, men make less than

0:19:01.200 --> 0:19:03.920
<v Speaker 1>someone with a similar skill set in the office, things

0:19:03.960 --> 0:19:06.399
<v Speaker 1>that don't make sense at all except for gender. It

0:19:06.480 --> 0:19:08.919
<v Speaker 1>is interesting when you think about sort of the progression

0:19:09.200 --> 0:19:14.680
<v Speaker 1>of automation that it occurs across different categories. So we

0:19:14.840 --> 0:19:18.960
<v Speaker 1>start with blue collar jobs, and then it moves to

0:19:19.680 --> 0:19:22.760
<v Speaker 1>white collar jobs, and then people like us in the

0:19:22.760 --> 0:19:25.040
<v Speaker 1>media start to get really scared because we go, oh, wait,

0:19:25.119 --> 0:19:28.719
<v Speaker 1>it's for me, which just proves the sort of bias

0:19:28.840 --> 0:19:30.959
<v Speaker 1>that's in the implicit in all of that. But then

0:19:31.000 --> 0:19:33.800
<v Speaker 1>there's also the gender. So it's like blue collar jobs,

0:19:33.800 --> 0:19:38.240
<v Speaker 1>which often have been male dominated jobs. So it'll be

0:19:38.560 --> 0:19:40.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, the next fifty years will be Yeah,

0:19:40.840 --> 0:19:44.280
<v Speaker 1>we'll see if quote unquote pink collar jobs stay pink

0:19:44.359 --> 0:19:48.840
<v Speaker 1>color or will that become more prestige work right, and

0:19:48.920 --> 0:19:51.240
<v Speaker 1>just the jobs that everybody needs and wants to have,

0:19:51.359 --> 0:19:53.920
<v Speaker 1>because they're the ones that actually are left. I was

0:19:54.000 --> 0:19:55.520
<v Speaker 1>talk to a lot of people who said managers are

0:19:55.520 --> 0:19:58.119
<v Speaker 1>going to be more valued in the future because managers

0:19:58.400 --> 0:20:01.200
<v Speaker 1>tend to have to work with people, promote cross teams,

0:20:01.280 --> 0:20:03.239
<v Speaker 1>and again, those are skills that are tend to be

0:20:03.280 --> 0:20:06.160
<v Speaker 1>associated with women. I guess I should go be a manager.

0:20:06.280 --> 0:20:08.680
<v Speaker 1>I know it's sorry everyone, I know nobody. Nobody wants

0:20:08.720 --> 0:20:11.600
<v Speaker 1>to hear that like that idea at all. Anyway, if

0:20:11.600 --> 0:20:13.080
<v Speaker 1>you don't want to row about to take your job,

0:20:13.160 --> 0:20:17.919
<v Speaker 1>get some social skills, I would have to say that.

0:20:17.960 --> 0:20:23.359
<v Speaker 1>But I do love that we're standing up for social skills.

0:20:23.400 --> 0:20:26.000
<v Speaker 1>I have relied on social skills more than intelligence or

0:20:26.040 --> 0:20:29.320
<v Speaker 1>talent for about twenty years now. So if that's the

0:20:29.359 --> 0:20:32.120
<v Speaker 1>way the future is going, I am well set for it,

0:20:33.480 --> 0:20:37.560
<v Speaker 1>all right. And now it's time for half bake takes.

0:20:40.520 --> 0:20:45.880
<v Speaker 1>Half fake takes. Half bake takes are not fully formed thoughts, ideas,

0:20:45.960 --> 0:20:49.520
<v Speaker 1>opinions that Becca and I have had and discussed. Becca,

0:20:49.680 --> 0:20:51.120
<v Speaker 1>do you want to lead us off with your half

0:20:51.119 --> 0:20:53.320
<v Speaker 1>bake take? So my half big take I think will

0:20:53.320 --> 0:20:57.480
<v Speaker 1>be controversial. Good. This morning I had a really horrible

0:20:57.560 --> 0:21:00.919
<v Speaker 1>subway commute where the four train that I take was

0:21:01.040 --> 0:21:03.880
<v Speaker 1>just crawling, got stuck with so slow it was crowded,

0:21:04.520 --> 0:21:06.280
<v Speaker 1>I had to stand in a weird position. My back

0:21:06.359 --> 0:21:10.440
<v Speaker 1>hurt terrible. Generally subway commuting is better than driving community,

0:21:10.800 --> 0:21:13.680
<v Speaker 1>but I think getting stuck on a slow train where

0:21:13.680 --> 0:21:17.040
<v Speaker 1>you think the worst thing is happening is on par

0:21:17.400 --> 0:21:20.760
<v Speaker 1>with being stuck in traffic while driving. It's really bad.

0:21:21.320 --> 0:21:24.160
<v Speaker 1>And being stuck in traffic totally terrible. It happens more

0:21:24.200 --> 0:21:27.520
<v Speaker 1>often if you're a driving community, But being stuck on

0:21:27.520 --> 0:21:29.720
<v Speaker 1>that train it's not. I know, you get to read

0:21:29.760 --> 0:21:33.000
<v Speaker 1>and stuff, but you run out of reading material and

0:21:33.160 --> 0:21:36.800
<v Speaker 1>it's like you don't have any personal space. I'm going

0:21:36.840 --> 0:21:40.159
<v Speaker 1>to disagree, kind of disagree with you here. Also, I

0:21:40.200 --> 0:21:42.240
<v Speaker 1>don't take a fancy train to work where you get

0:21:42.240 --> 0:21:45.080
<v Speaker 1>a seat right, No, no, no, agreed. But here's the

0:21:45.119 --> 0:21:47.000
<v Speaker 1>thing about getting stuck in traffic. When you're in a

0:21:47.040 --> 0:21:49.879
<v Speaker 1>car and you and you're driving, right, it's exhausting. No,

0:21:50.000 --> 0:21:52.719
<v Speaker 1>it is because you actually have to pay attention. I know,

0:21:52.840 --> 0:21:56.120
<v Speaker 1>I know, but I just there is. It's I think

0:21:56.160 --> 0:21:59.720
<v Speaker 1>generally subway communing is better, I really do. But this

0:22:00.040 --> 0:22:03.399
<v Speaker 1>running was really rough and I think as bad as

0:22:04.040 --> 0:22:06.600
<v Speaker 1>my old traffic. You know what, you know what I'm

0:22:06.600 --> 0:22:08.400
<v Speaker 1>going to do the thing that I think. I'm sorry

0:22:08.440 --> 0:22:12.000
<v Speaker 1>you had a bad community. Thank you. That's the important

0:22:12.040 --> 0:22:15.800
<v Speaker 1>thing here is your half baked take. Well, my half

0:22:15.800 --> 0:22:19.960
<v Speaker 1>baked take is also kind of travel related, mobility related.

0:22:20.480 --> 0:22:22.320
<v Speaker 1>Um ladies and gentlemen, if you are out there and

0:22:22.359 --> 0:22:25.080
<v Speaker 1>you have not signed up for t S A pre

0:22:25.240 --> 0:22:31.159
<v Speaker 1>Check or Global Entry, you are playing yourselves. This is

0:22:31.200 --> 0:22:34.040
<v Speaker 1>like the best thing that's happened. Okay, you recently just

0:22:34.160 --> 0:22:36.720
<v Speaker 1>got it because my credit card paid for it, and

0:22:37.480 --> 0:22:40.280
<v Speaker 1>it is really amazing. You can get to the airport

0:22:40.400 --> 0:22:42.280
<v Speaker 1>so late and you get to go through so quickly.

0:22:42.359 --> 0:22:44.639
<v Speaker 1>One thing I would say is that you know, we

0:22:44.720 --> 0:22:47.560
<v Speaker 1>have some t S A pre check privilege. Not everybody

0:22:47.920 --> 0:22:51.320
<v Speaker 1>can afford it or also we'll get approved. Maybe not gonna.

0:22:51.600 --> 0:22:53.920
<v Speaker 1>I gotta say, as far as the affordability is concerned,

0:22:54.080 --> 0:22:55.800
<v Speaker 1>if you do any traveling at all, I think it's

0:22:55.840 --> 0:23:01.200
<v Speaker 1>what like for five years. Okay, yeah, it's I guess

0:23:01.200 --> 0:23:03.240
<v Speaker 1>if you're buying a plane ticket, you can probably afford it.

0:23:03.280 --> 0:23:06.080
<v Speaker 1>But not everyone gets approved. And I was felt kind

0:23:06.119 --> 0:23:10.520
<v Speaker 1>of weird giving my fingerprints to the government. Right. Um,

0:23:10.560 --> 0:23:12.879
<v Speaker 1>there is t S A pre Check which works domestically.

0:23:12.920 --> 0:23:16.200
<v Speaker 1>Global Entry is another program that allows you also to

0:23:16.240 --> 0:23:18.640
<v Speaker 1>skip the line when you're returning from a foreign country

0:23:18.760 --> 0:23:21.960
<v Speaker 1>at immigration, um and includes pre check. I think it's

0:23:22.000 --> 0:23:24.639
<v Speaker 1>like twenty more so it's actually the better deal. You know,

0:23:24.840 --> 0:23:26.760
<v Speaker 1>maybe I should have done that. Uh. The t s

0:23:26.800 --> 0:23:29.040
<v Speaker 1>A itself is really interested in getting as many people

0:23:29.080 --> 0:23:31.560
<v Speaker 1>to sign up as possible because it produces the standard

0:23:31.560 --> 0:23:35.440
<v Speaker 1>line at their already overtax security checkpoints. And so they've

0:23:35.440 --> 0:23:39.359
<v Speaker 1>actually been setting up sort of temporary or mobile registration sites.

0:23:39.440 --> 0:23:42.120
<v Speaker 1>I do suggest you go online see if there's one

0:23:42.160 --> 0:23:44.920
<v Speaker 1>near you, make the time to go over there. It's

0:23:44.920 --> 0:23:48.840
<v Speaker 1>like flying in nineteen, like seven again, you just kind

0:23:48.840 --> 0:23:51.600
<v Speaker 1>of like, oh, yeah, here's a metal detector. I'm breezing through.

0:23:51.760 --> 0:23:53.240
<v Speaker 1>That's a reason to do it. You don't have to

0:23:53.320 --> 0:23:59.760
<v Speaker 1>go through the rapist scan machines. So that's what they're called. Okay,

0:24:00.119 --> 0:24:06.080
<v Speaker 1>and this has been half break takes, half baked takes.

0:24:06.640 --> 0:24:09.000
<v Speaker 1>Thank you for listening, and thank you again to Professor

0:24:09.080 --> 0:24:13.320
<v Speaker 1>David Demming from Harvard School of Graduate Education. You've been

0:24:13.320 --> 0:24:16.400
<v Speaker 1>listening to game Plan. Game Plan is produced by Liz

0:24:16.480 --> 0:24:20.439
<v Speaker 1>Smith and Magnus Hendrickson. The head of Bloomberg Podcast is

0:24:20.880 --> 0:24:24.080
<v Speaker 1>Alec McCabe. If you like the show, head on over

0:24:24.160 --> 0:24:26.920
<v Speaker 1>to iTunes or wherever you listen to podcasts and rate

0:24:27.160 --> 0:24:30.919
<v Speaker 1>and review and subscribe. We read the reviews, and if

0:24:30.960 --> 0:24:32.879
<v Speaker 1>you want to reach out to us directly, we are

0:24:32.920 --> 0:24:36.080
<v Speaker 1>always on Twitter, always eager to get your messages. I

0:24:36.119 --> 0:24:39.440
<v Speaker 1>am at sam grow Part and I'm at ours Greenfield.

0:24:39.640 --> 0:24:54.359
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening. Catch you next week. Hi. Get the

0:24:54.400 --> 0:24:56.720
<v Speaker 1>most from your people and send your business soaring with

0:24:56.800 --> 0:25:00.520
<v Speaker 1>corn Ferry. From executive search to talent strategy, leadership development,

0:25:00.560 --> 0:25:03.920
<v Speaker 1>rewards and succession planning. Corn Ferry knows up is more

0:25:03.920 --> 0:25:06.840
<v Speaker 1>than a direction, it's your future. Learn more at corn

0:25:06.880 --> 0:25:10.000
<v Speaker 1>ferry dot com slash up. You know that I have

0:25:10.080 --> 0:25:13.400
<v Speaker 1>a robot named after me? Really, it's the grow Bot.

0:25:13.600 --> 0:25:17.080
<v Speaker 1>The grow Bot, It's a robot that they sire about.

0:25:17.320 --> 0:25:19.720
<v Speaker 1>Named back at green pot