WEBVTT - Apple Makes the Right Move at the Right Time: Wedbush's Ives

0:00:01.360 --> 0:00:04.120
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Markets Podcast. I'm Paul Sweeney, along

0:00:04.120 --> 0:00:06.200
<v Speaker 1>with my co host of Bonnie Quinn. Every business day

0:00:06.240 --> 0:00:10.360
<v Speaker 1>we bring you interviews from CEO, market pros, and Bloomberg experts,

0:00:10.400 --> 0:00:13.600
<v Speaker 1>along with essential market moving news. Find the Bloomberg Markets

0:00:13.600 --> 0:00:17.000
<v Speaker 1>Podcast on Apple Podcasts or wherever you listen to podcasts,

0:00:17.000 --> 0:00:21.760
<v Speaker 1>and on Bloomberg dot com. Let's talk a little technology

0:00:21.840 --> 0:00:24.279
<v Speaker 1>to talk Apple, let's talk Uber And who better to

0:00:24.320 --> 0:00:26.960
<v Speaker 1>do that with than Dan Ives Dance and Managing director

0:00:27.000 --> 0:00:30.040
<v Speaker 1>for equity research at web Bush Securities. Uh, really one

0:00:30.080 --> 0:00:33.400
<v Speaker 1>of our go to voices on all things technology. Dance,

0:00:33.440 --> 0:00:35.920
<v Speaker 1>thanks so much for joining us here. Interesting news. I

0:00:35.960 --> 0:00:37.920
<v Speaker 1>just kind of read a news story just a couple

0:00:37.960 --> 0:00:41.400
<v Speaker 1>of minutes ago about Apple talking about bundling some of

0:00:41.479 --> 0:00:44.200
<v Speaker 1>their services here, what can you tell us about what's

0:00:44.240 --> 0:00:47.120
<v Speaker 1>actually going on with Apple and some of their services

0:00:47.159 --> 0:00:50.680
<v Speaker 1>businesses which are a key to the future of this company. Yeah,

0:00:50.720 --> 0:00:52.560
<v Speaker 1>and you hit the nail on the head in terms

0:00:52.640 --> 0:00:56.040
<v Speaker 1>of services being so significant. That's a sixty billion dollar

0:00:56.120 --> 0:00:59.760
<v Speaker 1>revenue stream next year. And I think the bundling, it's

0:00:59.760 --> 0:01:03.080
<v Speaker 1>just a massively smart move by Cooking Cupertino. I think

0:01:03.160 --> 0:01:06.800
<v Speaker 1>ultimately this could increase services revenues by another five to

0:01:06.920 --> 0:01:10.520
<v Speaker 1>seven percent. In terms of it's all that monetizing that

0:01:10.680 --> 0:01:14.039
<v Speaker 1>golden installed based That's what Apple is doing. They're very

0:01:14.080 --> 0:01:17.600
<v Speaker 1>similar many ways what Amazon done with the Amazon Prime.

0:01:19.280 --> 0:01:22.080
<v Speaker 1>What would they look like, because as I understand it,

0:01:22.600 --> 0:01:25.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, some of them are kind of bundled already.

0:01:25.680 --> 0:01:27.560
<v Speaker 1>Know you get like three or three months of this

0:01:27.760 --> 0:01:31.160
<v Speaker 1>if you you know, if you're subscribed to that, and

0:01:31.440 --> 0:01:36.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, maybe not exactly monthly bundling, but something similar. Yeah,

0:01:36.640 --> 0:01:39.360
<v Speaker 1>I think this is really take a step back if

0:01:39.360 --> 0:01:42.920
<v Speaker 1>you think about gaming, music, ultimately video you know, Apple

0:01:43.000 --> 0:01:46.040
<v Speaker 1>TV plus, you know, as well as potentially iCloud and

0:01:46.120 --> 0:01:49.440
<v Speaker 1>some other package services in there. I mean, as they

0:01:49.440 --> 0:01:54.640
<v Speaker 1>have continued to expand their offerings, they have more content

0:01:54.720 --> 0:01:56.400
<v Speaker 1>to sell and I think that's just going to increase

0:01:56.480 --> 0:01:59.280
<v Speaker 1>over time. And what this is really doing, it's putting

0:01:59.680 --> 0:02:02.680
<v Speaker 1>really more of a fence around their backyard, just monetized

0:02:02.760 --> 0:02:06.760
<v Speaker 1>the installation and ultimately pricing it. At points where media

0:02:06.880 --> 0:02:09.760
<v Speaker 1>consumer was not going to go for one or two

0:02:09.800 --> 0:02:12.280
<v Speaker 1>of the bundles like an Apple News, now they will,

0:02:12.680 --> 0:02:16.160
<v Speaker 1>and especially in the pandemic backdrop with the work from

0:02:16.280 --> 0:02:19.280
<v Speaker 1>home and many you know, continuing to to kind of

0:02:19.280 --> 0:02:22.000
<v Speaker 1>access things remotely. This is the right move at the

0:02:22.080 --> 0:02:24.520
<v Speaker 1>right time for them. Hey, Dan, I want to switch

0:02:24.520 --> 0:02:26.560
<v Speaker 1>gears a little bit and talk about just the gig

0:02:26.600 --> 0:02:30.440
<v Speaker 1>economy writ large week again. We got some jobless numbers today,

0:02:30.520 --> 0:02:35.600
<v Speaker 1>But thinking about Uber and California, UM California is talking

0:02:35.600 --> 0:02:39.359
<v Speaker 1>about I guess reclassifying some of those gig workers like

0:02:39.400 --> 0:02:43.480
<v Speaker 1>an Uber and Lifted drivers into employees. This is a

0:02:43.600 --> 0:02:49.080
<v Speaker 1>fundamental risk to these companies, isn't it. It's not just

0:02:49.160 --> 0:02:52.280
<v Speaker 1>the black cloud. It's really a future business model risk

0:02:52.760 --> 0:02:55.080
<v Speaker 1>to the overall gig economy with the Uber and Lift

0:02:55.120 --> 0:02:58.120
<v Speaker 1>frotain center, and it continues to be a head scratcher

0:02:58.200 --> 0:03:00.600
<v Speaker 1>for many you know, if you mean many of the

0:03:00.680 --> 0:03:03.639
<v Speaker 1>drivers that we've talked to you even over the last year,

0:03:04.000 --> 0:03:06.079
<v Speaker 1>they don't want to be employees. That's why they work

0:03:06.120 --> 0:03:10.160
<v Speaker 1>for Uber Uber itself. If they ever had to reclassify them,

0:03:10.560 --> 0:03:13.080
<v Speaker 1>that could be upwards a four to five million of

0:03:13.080 --> 0:03:16.040
<v Speaker 1>incremental costs per year. Obviously they're gonna fight through the

0:03:16.080 --> 0:03:18.880
<v Speaker 1>court system as well as in the ballot box. But

0:03:19.000 --> 0:03:21.640
<v Speaker 1>the fear is is in terms of what California is doing.

0:03:22.120 --> 0:03:25.080
<v Speaker 1>It's a Pandora's box situation where other states and cities

0:03:25.120 --> 0:03:28.359
<v Speaker 1>will file. Right now, we think VARs worsen the fight.

0:03:28.520 --> 0:03:31.800
<v Speaker 1>But if this continues down the road and ultimately Uber

0:03:31.840 --> 0:03:34.400
<v Speaker 1>that's why they might have to temporarily get out of California.

0:03:35.240 --> 0:03:38.400
<v Speaker 1>It's fascinating. Will it be a president for other companies?

0:03:38.480 --> 0:03:41.960
<v Speaker 1>You think? Well, I think when you think about gig economy,

0:03:42.000 --> 0:03:45.160
<v Speaker 1>that's the word because it's starts to ubern Live and

0:03:45.200 --> 0:03:48.080
<v Speaker 1>there's a cascading impact, and I think there's a lot

0:03:48.080 --> 0:03:50.880
<v Speaker 1>of unintended consequences here, which is part of the big

0:03:50.880 --> 0:03:54.520
<v Speaker 1>worry as California has gone down this head scratching route.

0:03:55.440 --> 0:03:57.960
<v Speaker 1>And when you think about the gay economy, you're talking

0:03:58.040 --> 0:04:01.680
<v Speaker 1>about something that's created millions of jobs and now many

0:04:01.680 --> 0:04:04.840
<v Speaker 1>of them could be at risk, even on the contractor

0:04:04.840 --> 0:04:08.200
<v Speaker 1>employee debate, and that continues to be a frustration, not

0:04:08.320 --> 0:04:11.880
<v Speaker 1>just for the companies but obviously for investors as right

0:04:11.920 --> 0:04:14.520
<v Speaker 1>now that continues to be the need to risk around

0:04:14.600 --> 0:04:17.039
<v Speaker 1>these names. Yeah, so it's interesting. I mean, I guess

0:04:17.120 --> 0:04:20.240
<v Speaker 1>the the argument there is clearly, hey, these folks are working,

0:04:20.240 --> 0:04:24.600
<v Speaker 1>but they're not getting benefits. For example, what's the what's

0:04:24.640 --> 0:04:27.800
<v Speaker 1>the argument from UH you know, the ubers and lifts

0:04:27.800 --> 0:04:31.880
<v Speaker 1>and the other gig companies. The argument is, if an

0:04:31.920 --> 0:04:36.039
<v Speaker 1>employee in the state of California's eye that wants to

0:04:36.080 --> 0:04:38.960
<v Speaker 1>work ten hours a week, what do they do? You know,

0:04:39.000 --> 0:04:41.279
<v Speaker 1>there's many of them. Like the flexible schedule might be

0:04:41.279 --> 0:04:44.320
<v Speaker 1>a second job, it might be actually income for a

0:04:44.480 --> 0:04:47.800
<v Speaker 1>student that's looking to save money for college. Stain. The

0:04:47.839 --> 0:04:52.160
<v Speaker 1>frustration from their perspective is the flexibility is the nature

0:04:52.279 --> 0:04:55.719
<v Speaker 1>of the driver model, and most drivers do not want that.

0:04:55.760 --> 0:05:00.080
<v Speaker 1>And that's that's ultimately the heart of the gig econ me,

0:05:00.160 --> 0:05:03.359
<v Speaker 1>which is why this is such a bewildering issue. Of Course,

0:05:03.400 --> 0:05:05.880
<v Speaker 1>at a time, in a once in a hundre your

0:05:05.960 --> 0:05:09.600
<v Speaker 1>pandemic where the gig economy, we believe, based on our

0:05:09.640 --> 0:05:14.599
<v Speaker 1>survey work of consumers will not get into an uber

0:05:14.680 --> 0:05:18.120
<v Speaker 1>or lift to a vaccines found just given safety issues.

0:05:18.400 --> 0:05:21.919
<v Speaker 1>Will there be consolidation among some of these types of

0:05:21.960 --> 0:05:24.800
<v Speaker 1>companies you know, Uber Lift, and of course you have

0:05:24.920 --> 0:05:29.480
<v Speaker 1>other companies in the gig economy competing too. I mean,

0:05:29.480 --> 0:05:32.800
<v Speaker 1>I think you will start to see some consolidation on

0:05:32.839 --> 0:05:35.440
<v Speaker 1>the smaller side. Uber and Wift, I think they go

0:05:35.520 --> 0:05:38.520
<v Speaker 1>about it alone. That's why profitability is so important, and

0:05:38.520 --> 0:05:41.400
<v Speaker 1>that's what we've talked about yesterday. But right now to

0:05:41.440 --> 0:05:45.840
<v Speaker 1>herculean but bill battle for many of these companies as

0:05:45.880 --> 0:05:48.240
<v Speaker 1>they get through this environment. I do believe on the

0:05:48.240 --> 0:05:50.719
<v Speaker 1>other side they will be able to navigate, but for

0:05:50.839 --> 0:05:54.120
<v Speaker 1>right now, this continues to be just a massive headwind

0:05:54.120 --> 0:05:56.560
<v Speaker 1>that they're facing down before we go. I have one

0:05:56.720 --> 0:05:59.800
<v Speaker 1>question for you. Of all of your companies in your

0:06:00.000 --> 0:06:02.480
<v Speaker 1>of the universe, the only underperform you have is on

0:06:02.640 --> 0:06:04.800
<v Speaker 1>Slack Technologies, which I would have thought might have been

0:06:04.800 --> 0:06:08.560
<v Speaker 1>doing pretty okay in this environment. Why own the performance?

0:06:08.560 --> 0:06:14.000
<v Speaker 1>Slack a great company, obviously work from home name. Our

0:06:14.040 --> 0:06:17.200
<v Speaker 1>biggest issue with Slack is the stocks had a great run.

0:06:17.600 --> 0:06:20.360
<v Speaker 1>I just think with Microsoft and Redmond and teens, that's

0:06:20.400 --> 0:06:23.000
<v Speaker 1>going to be a very difficult market for them to

0:06:23.080 --> 0:06:26.880
<v Speaker 1>further penetrates. They go after Microsoft, a great company. It

0:06:27.040 --> 0:06:29.000
<v Speaker 1>just comes down to, is a great company a great

0:06:29.000 --> 0:06:32.839
<v Speaker 1>stock at this valuation. That's why we're cautious at Slack

0:06:32.880 --> 0:06:36.039
<v Speaker 1>at these levels. I hear that, all right, and thank

0:06:36.080 --> 0:06:39.680
<v Speaker 1>you and thanks for being so open about that particular question.

0:06:39.720 --> 0:06:43.720
<v Speaker 1>I appreciated Don Ives, equity analysts at wed Bush Securities

0:06:43.760 --> 0:06:48.240
<v Speaker 1>joining us it is time for Bloomberg Opinion, and for

0:06:48.440 --> 0:06:50.960
<v Speaker 1>that now we bring in one of our favorite opinion columnists,

0:06:51.000 --> 0:06:53.840
<v Speaker 1>and Neil Ferguson, a senior fellow at the Hoover Institution

0:06:54.120 --> 0:06:56.880
<v Speaker 1>and of course Bloomberg columnist, among many many other roles

0:06:56.920 --> 0:06:59.600
<v Speaker 1>that he plays in society and has played over the

0:06:59.680 --> 0:07:03.679
<v Speaker 1>years in academia and elsewhere. His latest column is TikTok

0:07:03.760 --> 0:07:06.960
<v Speaker 1>is a super weapon in China's Culture War. Neil, thanks

0:07:07.000 --> 0:07:10.440
<v Speaker 1>for joining. I want to read out the first couple

0:07:10.440 --> 0:07:12.760
<v Speaker 1>of lines of your column. It's hard to get past

0:07:12.760 --> 0:07:15.920
<v Speaker 1>the initial share inality of TikTok. I spent half an

0:07:15.920 --> 0:07:17.920
<v Speaker 1>hour trying to make sense of the endless feed of

0:07:18.000 --> 0:07:20.640
<v Speaker 1>video snippets of ordinary people doing daft things with their

0:07:20.680 --> 0:07:23.720
<v Speaker 1>dogs or in their kitchens or in the gym. That's

0:07:23.720 --> 0:07:27.000
<v Speaker 1>the background. If TikTok is so inane, how has it

0:07:27.040 --> 0:07:30.040
<v Speaker 1>become such a cultural lever in the sense that it's

0:07:30.040 --> 0:07:33.680
<v Speaker 1>mobilized K pop fans to register for Donald Trump's Tulsa rally.

0:07:33.760 --> 0:07:36.640
<v Speaker 1>It's been a pandemic favorite and suddenly, as you say,

0:07:36.680 --> 0:07:38.680
<v Speaker 1>it's now got something to do with Cold War two.

0:07:40.160 --> 0:07:42.640
<v Speaker 1>That's right. Well on my initial reaction, As you can tell,

0:07:42.760 --> 0:07:45.440
<v Speaker 1>from the opening of the column was give me a break,

0:07:46.640 --> 0:07:50.800
<v Speaker 1>it's not serious. I did some some thorough research, as

0:07:50.840 --> 0:07:53.560
<v Speaker 1>a middle aged man should when confronted with an app

0:07:53.640 --> 0:07:57.800
<v Speaker 1>popular with the young. My kids and I got some

0:07:57.880 --> 0:08:00.840
<v Speaker 1>interesting feedback. My eight year old son said, Hey, check

0:08:00.840 --> 0:08:04.360
<v Speaker 1>out the Dancing Weasel, but my twenty one year old

0:08:04.400 --> 0:08:07.800
<v Speaker 1>son said, woe, it's it's toxic. I don't go near it,

0:08:07.840 --> 0:08:11.000
<v Speaker 1>and that was an interesting clue. I think the key

0:08:11.040 --> 0:08:14.680
<v Speaker 1>here is to recognize that this is a Chinese owned

0:08:14.920 --> 0:08:20.000
<v Speaker 1>app powered by artificial intelligence that is incredibly appealing and

0:08:20.120 --> 0:08:25.280
<v Speaker 1>indeed addictive to teenagers, and half of American teenagers have

0:08:25.560 --> 0:08:30.480
<v Speaker 1>used TikTok. When they use it, what they're doing is

0:08:30.600 --> 0:08:35.400
<v Speaker 1>essentially providing the app with data, and the app also

0:08:35.559 --> 0:08:38.640
<v Speaker 1>looks for other data about them. It doesn't just sit

0:08:38.679 --> 0:08:43.000
<v Speaker 1>there passively. We know from other reports that that TikTok

0:08:43.360 --> 0:08:47.559
<v Speaker 1>is pretty good, rather like Facebook getting data about users

0:08:47.600 --> 0:08:50.560
<v Speaker 1>from any source it can online. And so the key

0:08:50.679 --> 0:08:54.600
<v Speaker 1>argument here is that we've essentially created a portal are

0:08:54.640 --> 0:08:57.320
<v Speaker 1>allowed to be created, the portal through which young Americans

0:08:57.400 --> 0:09:03.000
<v Speaker 1>provide all kinds of personal data, potentially embarrassing even compromising

0:09:03.080 --> 0:09:05.800
<v Speaker 1>data to a Chinese controlled app. And the critical point

0:09:05.920 --> 0:09:09.600
<v Speaker 1>is that TikTok is owned by a Chinese company, byite Dance,

0:09:09.920 --> 0:09:13.800
<v Speaker 1>and any Chinese internet company is legally obliged to make

0:09:13.920 --> 0:09:17.640
<v Speaker 1>data all data available to the Chinese government, that is,

0:09:17.679 --> 0:09:20.920
<v Speaker 1>the Chinese Communist Party. And that's why this apparently silly

0:09:20.960 --> 0:09:25.480
<v Speaker 1>trivial app actually is a problem, and we can't simply

0:09:25.600 --> 0:09:28.320
<v Speaker 1>let it carry on the way it is, which is

0:09:28.880 --> 0:09:34.320
<v Speaker 1>essentially becoming the most popular app amongst amongst young Americans.

0:09:34.360 --> 0:09:37.520
<v Speaker 1>So neil I believe TikTok's response would be, hey, all

0:09:37.559 --> 0:09:40.600
<v Speaker 1>of the data is on servers. None of those servers

0:09:40.679 --> 0:09:46.800
<v Speaker 1>are in China. Um is that a valid kind of response. No,

0:09:46.880 --> 0:09:50.040
<v Speaker 1>it's not, because it doesn't really matter where the servers are.

0:09:50.240 --> 0:09:54.440
<v Speaker 1>If if she didn't, Pink calls up Uh and says, hey,

0:09:54.960 --> 0:09:59.440
<v Speaker 1>we want to check out data on X because bite

0:09:59.520 --> 0:10:03.880
<v Speaker 1>dance is compelled by Chinese law to to to comply,

0:10:04.200 --> 0:10:07.000
<v Speaker 1>then there would be no There would be no way

0:10:07.000 --> 0:10:10.000
<v Speaker 1>of their saying no. I mean, I think to be fair.

0:10:10.080 --> 0:10:13.079
<v Speaker 1>John J. Ming, who is the founder of bike Dance

0:10:13.160 --> 0:10:17.000
<v Speaker 1>and who had the vision to see TikTok's potential, you know,

0:10:17.080 --> 0:10:20.800
<v Speaker 1>he gets a lot of credit as an entrepreneur and visionary.

0:10:20.920 --> 0:10:24.199
<v Speaker 1>Facebook failed to make an app as good as this.

0:10:24.320 --> 0:10:26.920
<v Speaker 1>Facebook was trying to get video right, and it missed

0:10:26.960 --> 0:10:29.440
<v Speaker 1>the key point, which is that if you just let

0:10:30.040 --> 0:10:33.520
<v Speaker 1>users do the content and let the AI pick the

0:10:33.559 --> 0:10:36.040
<v Speaker 1>best content, you'll crush it. So you've got to give

0:10:36.120 --> 0:10:38.280
<v Speaker 1>him credit as an entrepreneur, and you should give him

0:10:38.280 --> 0:10:42.760
<v Speaker 1>credit also because I don't think personally he is an authoritarian.

0:10:42.880 --> 0:10:45.719
<v Speaker 1>But the reality is he's a Chinese citizen. It's a

0:10:45.800 --> 0:10:48.440
<v Speaker 1>Chinese company, the Chinese Communist Party. What's the data, It

0:10:48.440 --> 0:10:51.079
<v Speaker 1>doesn't matter where the servers are. And by the way,

0:10:51.320 --> 0:10:55.280
<v Speaker 1>you know TikTok says and it's user agreement that if

0:10:55.320 --> 0:10:59.240
<v Speaker 1>you hand over data then its parent company bike Dance

0:10:59.240 --> 0:11:01.760
<v Speaker 1>will have access the data. So they are open about that,

0:11:02.200 --> 0:11:04.240
<v Speaker 1>and now I think is the crux of the matter.

0:11:04.400 --> 0:11:06.280
<v Speaker 1>Although as you say, you know this has to be

0:11:06.360 --> 0:11:09.040
<v Speaker 1>seen in a broader context. I think I would be

0:11:09.120 --> 0:11:11.880
<v Speaker 1>less exercised about all this if it wasn't for the

0:11:11.920 --> 0:11:15.200
<v Speaker 1>fact that we know China is now engaged in a

0:11:15.280 --> 0:11:21.480
<v Speaker 1>pretty active campaign online and offline to exert influence in

0:11:21.520 --> 0:11:24.560
<v Speaker 1>American culture. Really the way the Russians did back in

0:11:24.600 --> 0:11:29.079
<v Speaker 1>twenty sixteen and We've seen active efforts by the Chinese

0:11:29.120 --> 0:11:34.199
<v Speaker 1>government on Twitter on other platforms too, so disinformation about

0:11:34.200 --> 0:11:37.320
<v Speaker 1>COVID nineteen. So this has to be seen in that context.

0:11:37.640 --> 0:11:40.280
<v Speaker 1>It's not as if the Chinese government is playing no

0:11:40.920 --> 0:11:44.280
<v Speaker 1>part in our culture war. It is actively involved in

0:11:44.320 --> 0:11:49.280
<v Speaker 1>trying to sow disinformation in American public discourse. Neil, we

0:11:49.559 --> 0:11:53.520
<v Speaker 1>finally have a tickets in Joe Biden, Kamala Harris. If

0:11:53.720 --> 0:11:57.400
<v Speaker 1>that turns out to be the next you know, inhabitants

0:11:57.440 --> 0:12:01.280
<v Speaker 1>of the White House and the of All Office, and

0:12:01.559 --> 0:12:03.560
<v Speaker 1>you know various wings of the West of the West

0:12:03.600 --> 0:12:06.360
<v Speaker 1>Wing and the East Wing, and so what have you.

0:12:06.559 --> 0:12:10.360
<v Speaker 1>What happens with the China relationship, Well, I think from

0:12:10.440 --> 0:12:15.720
<v Speaker 1>the vantage points of China, Biden presidency has become a

0:12:15.760 --> 0:12:19.400
<v Speaker 1>lot more repealing than a continuation of the Trump presidency,

0:12:19.480 --> 0:12:22.800
<v Speaker 1>because although Donald Trump started off trying to have a

0:12:22.880 --> 0:12:26.160
<v Speaker 1>close personal relationship with t and thing, since the trade

0:12:26.160 --> 0:12:30.560
<v Speaker 1>war started in ten things have gone rapidly downhill. And

0:12:30.600 --> 0:12:34.040
<v Speaker 1>I argued at the beginning of last year that we

0:12:34.040 --> 0:12:36.120
<v Speaker 1>were in Cold War two and we should, you know,

0:12:36.160 --> 0:12:39.600
<v Speaker 1>stop kidding ourselves. So I think from the Chinese vantage point,

0:12:39.960 --> 0:12:42.400
<v Speaker 1>they just want to get through to November three and

0:12:42.520 --> 0:12:47.040
<v Speaker 1>hope that that they get an altogether less hawkish president.

0:12:47.280 --> 0:12:50.440
<v Speaker 1>Kamala Harris is an interesting pick for Biden. I think

0:12:50.440 --> 0:12:53.839
<v Speaker 1>from the vantage point of the tech sector, it's a

0:12:53.960 --> 0:12:56.920
<v Speaker 1>kind of sigh of relief because although she's been known

0:12:56.960 --> 0:13:00.240
<v Speaker 1>for her pretty aggressive questioning on Congressional committe he is

0:13:00.280 --> 0:13:03.400
<v Speaker 1>in truth, I think she is as friendly a vice

0:13:03.440 --> 0:13:06.720
<v Speaker 1>presidential candidate a Silicon Valley could have hoped for. So

0:13:06.840 --> 0:13:08.839
<v Speaker 1>from that point of view, I think the risk of

0:13:08.880 --> 0:13:13.640
<v Speaker 1>aggressive antitrust and other actions probably goes down if Biden

0:13:13.679 --> 0:13:16.000
<v Speaker 1>Harris is the winning ticket. Neil, we just had the

0:13:16.000 --> 0:13:18.480
<v Speaker 1>president's call reporters into the Oval office and we will

0:13:18.520 --> 0:13:20.560
<v Speaker 1>could likely be hearing from him in a few moments.

0:13:20.600 --> 0:13:23.679
<v Speaker 1>But there is a headline now that there is an

0:13:23.840 --> 0:13:28.200
<v Speaker 1>historic deal to normalize relations between Israel and the United

0:13:28.280 --> 0:13:31.160
<v Speaker 1>Arab Emirates. I'm curious as to your thoughts about how

0:13:31.160 --> 0:13:33.720
<v Speaker 1>the Middle East will be reshaped, if at all, given

0:13:34.520 --> 0:13:38.520
<v Speaker 1>that Israel has this new normalized relationship apparently with the

0:13:38.559 --> 0:13:42.360
<v Speaker 1>United Arab Emirates. Well, this has been kind of cooking

0:13:42.480 --> 0:13:46.920
<v Speaker 1>quietly for a while. Most attention has been elsewhere, and

0:13:46.960 --> 0:13:51.000
<v Speaker 1>of course substantial sections the media are skeptical about the

0:13:51.040 --> 0:13:54.760
<v Speaker 1>President's Middle East policy and have been from the very outset,

0:13:54.880 --> 0:13:58.440
<v Speaker 1>But in reality, there's been a massive realignment in the

0:13:58.520 --> 0:14:01.480
<v Speaker 1>region in the last three and years, and I think

0:14:01.480 --> 0:14:05.240
<v Speaker 1>the Trump administration has done something at least to contribute

0:14:05.240 --> 0:14:08.000
<v Speaker 1>to that, the main alignment being but a whole bunch

0:14:08.080 --> 0:14:11.160
<v Speaker 1>of our countries, led by the U a E. Have

0:14:11.320 --> 0:14:16.880
<v Speaker 1>been looking to normalize relations with Israel and focus regional

0:14:17.480 --> 0:14:21.480
<v Speaker 1>security policy on Iran, which poses a threat not only

0:14:21.560 --> 0:14:25.240
<v Speaker 1>to Israel but two Sunni majority states. So I think

0:14:25.280 --> 0:14:28.240
<v Speaker 1>this is important and I think it actually is a

0:14:28.280 --> 0:14:31.200
<v Speaker 1>success for President Trump. That don't expect to read that

0:14:31.320 --> 0:14:33.720
<v Speaker 1>in the New York Times of the Washington Post this week.

0:14:34.440 --> 0:14:38.320
<v Speaker 1>Neil Ferguson, senior fellow at Hoover Institution and a Bloomberg

0:14:38.320 --> 0:14:44.000
<v Speaker 1>opinion calumnist. A m C right there reopening and it's

0:14:44.000 --> 0:14:46.080
<v Speaker 1>been a big story this morning. Mark Lazie the other

0:14:46.120 --> 0:14:48.160
<v Speaker 1>day talking about how he was looking at a MCS

0:14:48.280 --> 0:14:52.160
<v Speaker 1>secured debt. And that's what I want to start with

0:14:52.200 --> 0:14:55.480
<v Speaker 1>when I bring in Sally Bakewell, who's a corporate finance reporter,

0:14:55.640 --> 0:14:57.880
<v Speaker 1>because one of her stories in the last couple of days,

0:14:58.040 --> 0:15:00.160
<v Speaker 1>most of America is being shot out of the great

0:15:00.320 --> 0:15:03.520
<v Speaker 1>borrowing binge. Ever, and this is why Mark Lazie is

0:15:03.560 --> 0:15:07.760
<v Speaker 1>looking at the types of things like AMC secured debt. Sally,

0:15:07.880 --> 0:15:11.200
<v Speaker 1>tell us what exactly you mean by the fact that many,

0:15:11.240 --> 0:15:15.880
<v Speaker 1>many great companies are actually not able to borrow these days, Hi, Funnie. Yeah,

0:15:15.880 --> 0:15:18.240
<v Speaker 1>AMC is actually a really great example that you bring

0:15:18.360 --> 0:15:22.760
<v Speaker 1>up there, because like a number of companies airlines, hotels,

0:15:23.280 --> 0:15:27.320
<v Speaker 1>cruise lines, it's been absolutely devastated or it had been

0:15:27.320 --> 0:15:29.960
<v Speaker 1>devastated by the virus. The virus of course whites out

0:15:30.400 --> 0:15:35.320
<v Speaker 1>the revenue of it and many consumer facing companies UM.

0:15:35.320 --> 0:15:38.080
<v Speaker 1>And what they've been able to do, however, because they're

0:15:38.120 --> 0:15:41.080
<v Speaker 1>big companies that can tack the bond market is go

0:15:41.360 --> 0:15:45.440
<v Speaker 1>straight there and they've found willing invested to pay debt

0:15:45.760 --> 0:15:50.280
<v Speaker 1>because the debt markets have effectively been back stopped by

0:15:50.400 --> 0:15:55.800
<v Speaker 1>the vast kind of Federal reserve guerrilla UM and it's

0:15:55.840 --> 0:15:58.680
<v Speaker 1>pledged to use it near limitless balance sheet to buy

0:15:58.720 --> 0:16:02.120
<v Speaker 1>corporate bonds, and so that hasn't enabled all these companies

0:16:02.280 --> 0:16:06.920
<v Speaker 1>kind of almost without too much discrimination, all of them

0:16:06.920 --> 0:16:09.280
<v Speaker 1>have been able to hit the bond market. And we

0:16:09.360 --> 0:16:14.400
<v Speaker 1>saw another fantastic example of the kind of limitless nature

0:16:14.440 --> 0:16:18.440
<v Speaker 1>of it today with Apple, which is of course of

0:16:18.840 --> 0:16:21.760
<v Speaker 1>a great blue ship company that would lenders would fall

0:16:21.760 --> 0:16:24.520
<v Speaker 1>over themselves to Lento. But it's it's in the same

0:16:24.800 --> 0:16:27.360
<v Speaker 1>group of big companies. They can hit the bond market,

0:16:27.440 --> 0:16:30.280
<v Speaker 1>bond market no matter what, UM. But on the other

0:16:30.400 --> 0:16:35.160
<v Speaker 1>side of that, that kind of tremendous liquidity opportunity is

0:16:35.240 --> 0:16:39.000
<v Speaker 1>not mirrored for smaller firms, and that's how we're getting

0:16:39.000 --> 0:16:41.560
<v Speaker 1>the fact that they're missing out. Yeah. So sadly, the

0:16:41.560 --> 0:16:44.800
<v Speaker 1>smaller firms, mid sized firms, they depend less on the

0:16:44.840 --> 0:16:48.960
<v Speaker 1>capital markets, more on their local banks. Are are bank lenders,

0:16:49.640 --> 0:16:53.040
<v Speaker 1>and I guess they're being prudent saying, boy, in this pandemic,

0:16:53.080 --> 0:16:57.000
<v Speaker 1>I gotta be tighter on my credit standards. Is that

0:16:57.080 --> 0:17:00.760
<v Speaker 1>kind of what's happening here? Absolutely, that's what's happening. UM.

0:17:00.960 --> 0:17:05.000
<v Speaker 1>There was a recent loan officers survey of UM some

0:17:05.040 --> 0:17:08.240
<v Speaker 1>of the biggest banks where they found that loans have

0:17:08.400 --> 0:17:11.760
<v Speaker 1>been tightening at the fastest pace or at the most

0:17:12.000 --> 0:17:15.520
<v Speaker 1>since at least the financial crisis, and prices have gone

0:17:15.600 --> 0:17:19.240
<v Speaker 1>up to so for smaller companies, they can't access the

0:17:19.280 --> 0:17:23.440
<v Speaker 1>bond market, where this enormous amount of liquidity is squashing around, UM,

0:17:23.480 --> 0:17:26.760
<v Speaker 1>and it's harder for them to get loan. Now, on

0:17:26.840 --> 0:17:30.439
<v Speaker 1>the flip side, the Federal Reserve has come up with

0:17:30.480 --> 0:17:34.639
<v Speaker 1>these other lending programs. It has the main Street Lending program,

0:17:34.680 --> 0:17:38.240
<v Speaker 1>it has the Paycheck Protection program. But those have drawn

0:17:38.280 --> 0:17:43.359
<v Speaker 1>criticisms for being quite difficult to access, for being complex.

0:17:43.680 --> 0:17:47.000
<v Speaker 1>And actually, Paul, you raised that point. Banks don't necessarily

0:17:47.040 --> 0:17:51.000
<v Speaker 1>want to be involved in them because they don't feel

0:17:51.000 --> 0:17:54.080
<v Speaker 1>that they're being compensated for the risk of lending to

0:17:54.200 --> 0:17:57.560
<v Speaker 1>companies that potentially if you don't know if they will

0:17:57.600 --> 0:18:01.960
<v Speaker 1>be around in the next year, Sally, what happens to

0:18:02.040 --> 0:18:04.040
<v Speaker 1>these companies you just said they may not be around

0:18:04.040 --> 0:18:06.560
<v Speaker 1>in the next year. But there are also options like,

0:18:06.680 --> 0:18:11.680
<v Speaker 1>for example, going to quote unquote vulture investors. Right, yeah,

0:18:11.720 --> 0:18:14.800
<v Speaker 1>and that is another world, um, that we are seeing

0:18:14.960 --> 0:18:19.080
<v Speaker 1>varying degrees of activity. Um. Of course, there are all

0:18:19.160 --> 0:18:22.840
<v Speaker 1>the direct lenders, there are the distressed funds UM to

0:18:23.040 --> 0:18:26.639
<v Speaker 1>varying degrees. They are jumping in opportunities. But you know

0:18:26.720 --> 0:18:30.760
<v Speaker 1>that comes at the price too, So it's it's there

0:18:30.880 --> 0:18:33.199
<v Speaker 1>is money there, but you probably have to pay up

0:18:33.240 --> 0:18:36.480
<v Speaker 1>for it, um. And but a lot of firms a

0:18:36.480 --> 0:18:41.200
<v Speaker 1>lot of investors are definitely seizing on on that opportunity

0:18:41.280 --> 0:18:45.679
<v Speaker 1>as other lenders for trend so sally. This kind of

0:18:45.680 --> 0:18:48.840
<v Speaker 1>causing the question again the role of the bank, the

0:18:48.920 --> 0:18:52.399
<v Speaker 1>local bank. This is the time when their customers really

0:18:52.720 --> 0:18:57.800
<v Speaker 1>need them. What are the banks say they are? I

0:18:57.880 --> 0:19:01.040
<v Speaker 1>think they're a bit tied, because of course they have

0:19:01.240 --> 0:19:05.240
<v Speaker 1>to be more risk averse. They are building up their

0:19:05.320 --> 0:19:09.719
<v Speaker 1>lost provisions because they know what well they know that

0:19:09.760 --> 0:19:13.080
<v Speaker 1>we don't know, um what exactly is down the road.

0:19:13.280 --> 0:19:16.399
<v Speaker 1>And after the last financial crisis, which they were the

0:19:16.440 --> 0:19:20.360
<v Speaker 1>epicenter of, they of course have become a lot more

0:19:20.480 --> 0:19:24.320
<v Speaker 1>risk averse. Um. But then they are under this kind

0:19:24.359 --> 0:19:27.120
<v Speaker 1>of pressure from the Federal Reserve two, which is trying

0:19:27.160 --> 0:19:29.720
<v Speaker 1>to coax them to lend to these small and medium

0:19:29.720 --> 0:19:32.199
<v Speaker 1>sized firms, which is so important to the economy. And

0:19:32.240 --> 0:19:35.040
<v Speaker 1>of course you know it's it's important for banks too

0:19:35.040 --> 0:19:38.399
<v Speaker 1>that those firms thrive. Um. But I think you know,

0:19:38.400 --> 0:19:41.040
<v Speaker 1>when I was talking to people for this story, um,

0:19:41.080 --> 0:19:44.320
<v Speaker 1>they said, you know, if you're a good customer, um,

0:19:44.359 --> 0:19:47.840
<v Speaker 1>without too much risk, you know, people might banks don't

0:19:47.880 --> 0:19:51.040
<v Speaker 1>necessarily want to lend to you anyway. They want to

0:19:51.080 --> 0:19:54.679
<v Speaker 1>get the fees they want to get the sort of

0:19:55.280 --> 0:19:57.679
<v Speaker 1>you know, higher interest rates, so you know they're in

0:19:57.680 --> 0:20:00.920
<v Speaker 1>a tight spot for sure. Yeah, exactly, Sally Bakeball, thanks

0:20:00.920 --> 0:20:03.560
<v Speaker 1>so much for joining us. Really appreciate a fascinating story here. Again,

0:20:03.640 --> 0:20:06.119
<v Speaker 1>big companies like Apple and so on barring and historically

0:20:06.160 --> 0:20:08.120
<v Speaker 1>low rates, but a lot of small and midsized businesses

0:20:08.440 --> 0:20:11.600
<v Speaker 1>really finding it hard to get credit here in this pandemic,

0:20:11.640 --> 0:20:18.240
<v Speaker 1>so fascinating story. Sally Bakewell, corporate financial reporter for Bloomberg News. Well,

0:20:18.280 --> 0:20:20.040
<v Speaker 1>it is going to be a slightly different back to

0:20:20.080 --> 0:20:23.120
<v Speaker 1>school retail season this year, if it exists at all.

0:20:23.280 --> 0:20:26.960
<v Speaker 1>Let's ask somebody who has been following this and presumably

0:20:27.119 --> 0:20:30.960
<v Speaker 1>has some data and at least much much better informed

0:20:31.040 --> 0:20:34.080
<v Speaker 1>about what's going on out there than me. Arthur Zachowitz

0:20:34.520 --> 0:20:37.719
<v Speaker 1>is Women's Where Daily executive editor. Arthur, thank you so

0:20:37.840 --> 0:20:40.920
<v Speaker 1>much for joining us. What are you seeing this August

0:20:40.920 --> 0:20:43.120
<v Speaker 1>as we know approach what would have been a new

0:20:43.160 --> 0:20:47.359
<v Speaker 1>school year. Well, well, thanks for having me first. You know,

0:20:47.440 --> 0:20:49.600
<v Speaker 1>I think what we're seeing is a lot of uncertainty

0:20:49.680 --> 0:20:53.560
<v Speaker 1>and caution. Right, So, the National Retail Federation put ups

0:20:53.560 --> 0:20:56.080
<v Speaker 1>some of you know, kind of estimates on back to

0:20:56.119 --> 0:20:58.880
<v Speaker 1>school and they're looking at almost thirty four billion dollars

0:20:59.480 --> 0:21:03.359
<v Speaker 1>impact sales versus twenty six billion last year, and the

0:21:03.359 --> 0:21:05.359
<v Speaker 1>pulp bulk of that is is about ten billion in

0:21:05.440 --> 0:21:08.240
<v Speaker 1>online sales. But you know, honestly, you know, I think

0:21:08.280 --> 0:21:11.199
<v Speaker 1>that's kind of magical thinking, given you know what's occurring

0:21:11.200 --> 0:21:13.480
<v Speaker 1>in the market right now. Yeah, Arthur, I mean, do

0:21:13.520 --> 0:21:16.840
<v Speaker 1>we even have a sense of what percentage of KATE

0:21:16.960 --> 0:21:19.719
<v Speaker 1>through twelve students in the US will actually be going

0:21:19.760 --> 0:21:23.359
<v Speaker 1>back physically to school as opposed to remote learning? Yet again,

0:21:23.359 --> 0:21:24.920
<v Speaker 1>I know some parts of the South and the West

0:21:24.960 --> 0:21:27.119
<v Speaker 1>have actually and they have gone back to school, but

0:21:27.200 --> 0:21:30.040
<v Speaker 1>we have a sense of what percentage nationwide. Uh, you know,

0:21:30.040 --> 0:21:32.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't know that that's a great question. I know

0:21:32.080 --> 0:21:35.520
<v Speaker 1>that you know, there are plans in place in certain states, say,

0:21:35.760 --> 0:21:38.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, like New York, for example, has three different scenarios,

0:21:39.119 --> 0:21:41.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, with many of the schools, and they just decided,

0:21:41.680 --> 0:21:43.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, a couple of school districts in uh in

0:21:43.600 --> 0:21:47.359
<v Speaker 1>the Hudson Valley for example, just decided to do online only.

0:21:47.400 --> 0:21:49.720
<v Speaker 1>So we don't really know, and that's part of the uncertainty.

0:21:50.280 --> 0:21:52.359
<v Speaker 1>I think that you know, you're seeing Plus you know,

0:21:52.400 --> 0:21:55.240
<v Speaker 1>we heard I think New Roman may excuse me, new

0:21:55.359 --> 0:21:58.800
<v Speaker 1>brands said that they're a little um, you know, cautious

0:21:58.840 --> 0:22:01.240
<v Speaker 1>because the consumer's caution and just you know, as far

0:22:01.320 --> 0:22:03.120
<v Speaker 1>as like what to buy in the shopping lists haven't

0:22:03.200 --> 0:22:06.200
<v Speaker 1>even come through for a lot of school districts across

0:22:06.240 --> 0:22:10.199
<v Speaker 1>the country. So this uncertainty again in the market. What

0:22:10.520 --> 0:22:13.160
<v Speaker 1>runs are you hearing from that are very concerned about

0:22:13.160 --> 0:22:17.239
<v Speaker 1>their future? Arthur Well, I think, um, you know, we've

0:22:17.240 --> 0:22:19.960
<v Speaker 1>seen a lot of retail bankruptcies. Obviously, it seems like

0:22:19.960 --> 0:22:22.919
<v Speaker 1>every other day there's another retailer going out of business.

0:22:22.960 --> 0:22:25.400
<v Speaker 1>And and what's driving that is you know a lot

0:22:25.480 --> 0:22:29.840
<v Speaker 1>of you know, online sales and a reluctance like consumers

0:22:29.880 --> 0:22:32.800
<v Speaker 1>to go into physical stores. But you know, as far

0:22:32.840 --> 0:22:34.960
<v Speaker 1>as like who's gonna you know, play out the best

0:22:35.640 --> 0:22:38.080
<v Speaker 1>through the holidays and through you know, back to school,

0:22:38.560 --> 0:22:41.280
<v Speaker 1>I think Target is is well positioned, right, That's that

0:22:41.480 --> 0:22:44.000
<v Speaker 1>sort of that one stuff shop. You know that moms

0:22:44.080 --> 0:22:48.879
<v Speaker 1>feels comfortable you know, getting essentials, getting food, getting you know, apparel,

0:22:49.040 --> 0:22:51.320
<v Speaker 1>getting gifts. Uh, you know, they could go in and

0:22:51.320 --> 0:22:54.040
<v Speaker 1>out in a relatively you know, safe environment that they're

0:22:54.080 --> 0:22:56.720
<v Speaker 1>familiar with. But you know, everyone else this is a

0:22:57.400 --> 0:22:59.919
<v Speaker 1>challenging time. You know, if if you're not you know,

0:23:00.080 --> 0:23:04.080
<v Speaker 1>a brand that has a real strong connection to the consumer,

0:23:05.080 --> 0:23:07.560
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna have difficulties. I think moving forward, you know,

0:23:07.720 --> 0:23:10.879
<v Speaker 1>I think look look at Walmart recently label with their

0:23:10.920 --> 0:23:14.160
<v Speaker 1>guidance based on the uncertainty of back to school. So

0:23:14.240 --> 0:23:16.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's it's unclear as far as you know,

0:23:16.560 --> 0:23:19.040
<v Speaker 1>how this plays out in the future. Also, you know,

0:23:19.280 --> 0:23:21.359
<v Speaker 1>there's an interesting thing going all right, we have an

0:23:21.359 --> 0:23:24.440
<v Speaker 1>election year, which is creates uncertainty, right, we have the

0:23:24.520 --> 0:23:28.439
<v Speaker 1>pandemic which is ongoing. We have we're in a recession, right,

0:23:28.520 --> 0:23:30.720
<v Speaker 1>and then we have consumer anxiety on top of that.

0:23:30.800 --> 0:23:33.800
<v Speaker 1>So you know, it's a it's a perfect storm for

0:23:34.400 --> 0:23:37.560
<v Speaker 1>um creating shoppers who maybe want to be more frugal

0:23:37.600 --> 0:23:40.679
<v Speaker 1>and pull back on spending. So Arthur, what our parents

0:23:40.720 --> 0:23:42.760
<v Speaker 1>actually gonna be buying here in this back to school

0:23:42.880 --> 0:23:48.440
<v Speaker 1>is just just you know, mass and wipes and hand sanitizer. Sure,

0:23:48.480 --> 0:23:50.480
<v Speaker 1>because the safety it is first, right, So for the

0:23:50.520 --> 0:23:53.199
<v Speaker 1>kids going back, you know, it's still safety items, uh,

0:23:53.240 --> 0:23:54.960
<v Speaker 1>and you got to carry that stuff in something. So

0:23:55.040 --> 0:23:57.280
<v Speaker 1>I think backpacks, you know, you'll you'll see you know,

0:23:57.280 --> 0:24:01.280
<v Speaker 1>those traditional categories supposed to regular school supplies. You know,

0:24:01.280 --> 0:24:03.440
<v Speaker 1>as far as the peril is concerned. You know kids,

0:24:03.720 --> 0:24:05.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, if you're going physically back to school, they

0:24:05.680 --> 0:24:07.800
<v Speaker 1>tend that tends to come later. You know, they kind

0:24:07.800 --> 0:24:10.280
<v Speaker 1>of go into school and then they look, you know,

0:24:10.320 --> 0:24:12.119
<v Speaker 1>to see what everybody else is wearing and what the

0:24:12.119 --> 0:24:14.159
<v Speaker 1>trends are. And then they come back and you know

0:24:14.280 --> 0:24:18.080
<v Speaker 1>take mom uh either while online mostly and say I

0:24:18.119 --> 0:24:20.359
<v Speaker 1>want this, this and that, you know, and there's there's

0:24:20.359 --> 0:24:23.320
<v Speaker 1>some really interesting stuff going on right now. You know,

0:24:23.359 --> 0:24:25.440
<v Speaker 1>as far as like tweens. You know, I think Pup

0:24:25.440 --> 0:24:29.120
<v Speaker 1>Sugar Iss teams up with Old Navy. That's interesting. Um

0:24:29.400 --> 0:24:32.280
<v Speaker 1>Oshkosh Bagash is that you know that the the the

0:24:32.359 --> 0:24:34.600
<v Speaker 1>overall company, right, so they they're still being on in

0:24:34.600 --> 0:24:38.120
<v Speaker 1>twenty five years and they're launching a collection actually um

0:24:38.160 --> 0:24:40.960
<v Speaker 1>to red. You know they used to uh have adult stuff,

0:24:41.040 --> 0:24:43.040
<v Speaker 1>right so now they really introduced that so the whole

0:24:43.040 --> 0:24:46.040
<v Speaker 1>family could wear you know co uh you know cover rolls.

0:24:46.040 --> 0:24:49.439
<v Speaker 1>So that that's interesting. It's fun. But you know, um,

0:24:49.560 --> 0:24:51.479
<v Speaker 1>as far as like the staples are concerned, as far

0:24:51.520 --> 0:24:53.560
<v Speaker 1>as like apparel, you know, I think you'll see Nike

0:24:53.760 --> 0:24:57.160
<v Speaker 1>and um you know in brands that that offer active prayer,

0:24:57.720 --> 0:25:00.400
<v Speaker 1>uh and essentials too, like you know, shopping on targets

0:25:00.400 --> 0:25:03.320
<v Speaker 1>for example, you'll see printed T shirts as far as

0:25:03.720 --> 0:25:07.080
<v Speaker 1>you know from any brand really doing well. What about

0:25:07.080 --> 0:25:10.119
<v Speaker 1>the luxury brands? I mean, you know, and this wouldn't

0:25:10.160 --> 0:25:12.639
<v Speaker 1>just be for luxury customers. I mean put plenty of

0:25:12.720 --> 0:25:15.400
<v Speaker 1>youngsters out there, you know, save all you're just by

0:25:15.440 --> 0:25:17.359
<v Speaker 1>their yeasies or what. How do you you know that

0:25:17.520 --> 0:25:20.600
<v Speaker 1>the next drop will there still be drops for brands

0:25:20.680 --> 0:25:23.439
<v Speaker 1>like that? I think? So I think that that's going

0:25:23.480 --> 0:25:26.199
<v Speaker 1>to be a challenge because of all this uncertain it.

0:25:26.200 --> 0:25:30.080
<v Speaker 1>It's kind of a clouded market and it's everybody's getting bombarded, right,

0:25:30.119 --> 0:25:33.280
<v Speaker 1>so so things think about you, you've spent since last spring,

0:25:33.880 --> 0:25:36.159
<v Speaker 1>you know, hold up in your home with your family.

0:25:36.840 --> 0:25:39.720
<v Speaker 1>You've been bombarded with you know, a lot of director

0:25:39.760 --> 0:25:42.520
<v Speaker 1>consumer marketing firm brands themselves. So so how do you

0:25:42.680 --> 0:25:45.040
<v Speaker 1>cut through the clutter? You know? And the luxury brands,

0:25:45.400 --> 0:25:47.399
<v Speaker 1>you know, do that they have their loyal following. But

0:25:48.000 --> 0:25:49.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, there's a lot of research out there just

0:25:50.080 --> 0:25:53.399
<v Speaker 1>recently from uh, you know, de Lloyd and other companies

0:25:53.440 --> 0:25:56.800
<v Speaker 1>Adobe that kind of shows that that shop is particularly

0:25:56.960 --> 0:26:00.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, gen Z and millennials are have tried new

0:26:00.320 --> 0:26:04.120
<v Speaker 1>brands during COVID right, so they're moving away, so there's

0:26:04.320 --> 0:26:06.879
<v Speaker 1>a little bit less loyalty and because this stuck or

0:26:06.920 --> 0:26:08.800
<v Speaker 1>something they was stuck in behind, they were like, I'll

0:26:08.840 --> 0:26:11.920
<v Speaker 1>give that a shot. So if you'll luxury branding new

0:26:11.960 --> 0:26:14.520
<v Speaker 1>youth to that, yea, you know, I don't know. Arthur,

0:26:14.600 --> 0:26:16.320
<v Speaker 1>Thank you so much for joining us. We always appreciate

0:26:16.359 --> 0:26:19.960
<v Speaker 1>your thoughts into the retail space. Arthur Zechowitz, executive editor,

0:26:20.000 --> 0:26:22.080
<v Speaker 1>Woman's Where Daily, giving us his thoughts say, back to

0:26:22.160 --> 0:26:25.880
<v Speaker 1>school really key for retailers. A lot of uncertainty this year.

0:26:25.920 --> 0:26:28.600
<v Speaker 1>We'll see how it plays out for the retail space.

0:26:30.000 --> 0:26:32.600
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening to the Boomberg Markets podcast. You can

0:26:32.680 --> 0:26:36.359
<v Speaker 1>subscribe and listen to interviews at Apple Podcasts or whatever

0:26:36.560 --> 0:26:39.879
<v Speaker 1>podcast platform you prefer. I'm Bonnie Quinn. I'm on Twitter

0:26:40.119 --> 0:26:42.400
<v Speaker 1>at Bonnie Quinn, and I'm Paul Sweeney. I'm on Twitter

0:26:42.520 --> 0:26:45.320
<v Speaker 1>at pt Sweeney. Before the podcast, you can always catch

0:26:45.440 --> 0:26:46.960
<v Speaker 1>us worldwide at Bloomberg Radio.