WEBVTT - The Midterms are coming! Three political strategists break it all down

0:00:00.200 --> 0:00:03.440
<v Speaker 1>Hi everyone, I'm Katie Curic and this is next Question.

0:00:04.840 --> 0:00:08.119
<v Speaker 1>We're only a few weeks out from the mid terms

0:00:08.240 --> 0:00:11.239
<v Speaker 1>and there is a lot to unpack. It seems like

0:00:11.280 --> 0:00:15.200
<v Speaker 1>there's a new story every day about some race or another.

0:00:15.720 --> 0:00:19.239
<v Speaker 1>So I've brought on some of my favorite political experts

0:00:19.320 --> 0:00:22.639
<v Speaker 1>to help us all better understand what's at stake, what

0:00:22.720 --> 0:00:25.480
<v Speaker 1>are the races to watch, and what this all means

0:00:25.560 --> 0:00:30.319
<v Speaker 1>for My guest today are media and political strategists and

0:00:30.440 --> 0:00:34.080
<v Speaker 1>my former podcasting co host, Brian Goldsmith. I tried to

0:00:34.080 --> 0:00:36.479
<v Speaker 1>get Katie to think about running for office. I I

0:00:36.600 --> 0:00:40.040
<v Speaker 1>seriously did. She won't. She won't consider it, sadly for me,

0:00:40.600 --> 0:00:43.280
<v Speaker 1>as well as Liz Smith, a twenty year veteran of

0:00:43.320 --> 0:00:49.760
<v Speaker 1>Democratic political campaigns from Barack Obama to Peep Buddha j Edge.

0:00:50.040 --> 0:00:53.440
<v Speaker 1>She also has a new memoir out called Any Given Tuesday,

0:00:53.640 --> 0:00:57.440
<v Speaker 1>a Political Love Story, and she has that same feral

0:00:57.720 --> 0:01:02.800
<v Speaker 1>magnetism tour that Donald Trump does. And Republican political consultant

0:01:02.840 --> 0:01:06.399
<v Speaker 1>and host along with David axel Rod of the political

0:01:06.480 --> 0:01:11.440
<v Speaker 1>podcast Hacks on Tap Mike Murphy, Oh, I've been freaked

0:01:11.520 --> 0:01:14.800
<v Speaker 1>up for a decade about American politics. Let's dive in

0:01:16.800 --> 0:01:20.520
<v Speaker 1>Hello to my three amigoes. So great to see you all,

0:01:20.560 --> 0:01:24.760
<v Speaker 1>and I'm very excited to unpack these upcoming mid terms,

0:01:24.880 --> 0:01:30.560
<v Speaker 1>which I'm really getting pitted out about it, lovely. I

0:01:30.640 --> 0:01:33.440
<v Speaker 1>just wanted to paint that picture for all our listeners.

0:01:33.920 --> 0:01:36.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean, listen, it's felt like a bit of a

0:01:37.000 --> 0:01:42.039
<v Speaker 1>roller coaster in terms of what we might expect. And

0:01:42.400 --> 0:01:45.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I have my sort of point of view,

0:01:45.080 --> 0:01:47.760
<v Speaker 1>but I've got you three, So who cares what I think?

0:01:48.200 --> 0:01:50.760
<v Speaker 1>What do you think is going to happen? Or give

0:01:50.840 --> 0:01:54.200
<v Speaker 1>us sort of the state of play right now, knowing

0:01:54.360 --> 0:01:58.280
<v Speaker 1>full well that things could change on a dime. Mike,

0:01:58.720 --> 0:02:01.960
<v Speaker 1>what do you see happening? Well, you know, I'm I've

0:02:02.000 --> 0:02:04.160
<v Speaker 1>got the boring answer, which is I think it's gonna

0:02:04.160 --> 0:02:07.160
<v Speaker 1>be a typical mid term. You know, generally since World

0:02:07.160 --> 0:02:10.720
<v Speaker 1>War Two, the average has been the president's party loses

0:02:10.760 --> 0:02:14.000
<v Speaker 1>about twenties six seats. So there's been three instances, you know,

0:02:14.400 --> 0:02:17.320
<v Speaker 1>where that hasn't happened. So the big question is is

0:02:17.360 --> 0:02:20.400
<v Speaker 1>it different this time? Well, you take the mid term problems,

0:02:20.480 --> 0:02:23.880
<v Speaker 1>you add inflation on it, gas prices, all that sort

0:02:23.919 --> 0:02:26.280
<v Speaker 1>of stuff, and that would probably make it worse for

0:02:26.320 --> 0:02:30.040
<v Speaker 1>the Democrats. But there are some different things going on.

0:02:30.200 --> 0:02:33.960
<v Speaker 1>There's row which has energized some young voters who normally

0:02:34.040 --> 0:02:35.800
<v Speaker 1>don't vote in the off here that could be a

0:02:35.800 --> 0:02:37.679
<v Speaker 1>thumb on the scale, and I would say some old

0:02:37.760 --> 0:02:42.360
<v Speaker 1>voters tom exactly. But but the turnout problem is young voters.

0:02:42.720 --> 0:02:45.280
<v Speaker 1>Democrats have a big problem in the off You're getting

0:02:45.280 --> 0:02:47.440
<v Speaker 1>their young voters to show up. Maybe this will do it.

0:02:47.520 --> 0:02:50.960
<v Speaker 1>There's some anecdotal evidence. We do at the University of

0:02:51.080 --> 0:02:54.360
<v Speaker 1>Southern California Center for Plaical Future, I'm involved. We do

0:02:54.400 --> 0:02:56.640
<v Speaker 1>a voter registration thing and this year is the biggest

0:02:56.639 --> 0:02:59.920
<v Speaker 1>we've ever had by far. Is exploding, which is a typic.

0:03:00.320 --> 0:03:03.239
<v Speaker 1>So you know, there's that. And the Republicans have nominated

0:03:03.280 --> 0:03:06.280
<v Speaker 1>my beloved party that I'm hanging onto by a thread,

0:03:07.200 --> 0:03:10.919
<v Speaker 1>as we've nominated some real cinder blocks. Well, I'm a conservative,

0:03:11.000 --> 0:03:13.480
<v Speaker 1>and problem is I'm on policy. I'm right as center,

0:03:13.600 --> 0:03:16.119
<v Speaker 1>So I can't, you know, get out the Carl Mark's

0:03:16.120 --> 0:03:19.520
<v Speaker 1>heart tattoo and join the Democrats. I've been voting for

0:03:19.560 --> 0:03:22.000
<v Speaker 1>some lately, I have to admit, because we have some

0:03:22.080 --> 0:03:24.840
<v Speaker 1>unfit people running. But in a way of election, a

0:03:24.919 --> 0:03:28.280
<v Speaker 1>cinder block can get washed twenty feet so they could

0:03:28.280 --> 0:03:31.920
<v Speaker 1>win the Senate is the question. Yeah, Liz, what do

0:03:31.960 --> 0:03:36.000
<v Speaker 1>you see? So I agree with both you and with Mike.

0:03:36.240 --> 0:03:40.160
<v Speaker 1>It has been a complete roller coaster, starting with the

0:03:40.520 --> 0:03:45.240
<v Speaker 1>messy withdrawal from Afghanistan, when we saw Biden somers tank

0:03:45.440 --> 0:03:48.280
<v Speaker 1>and as a result, you know, in correlation with that,

0:03:48.600 --> 0:03:52.800
<v Speaker 1>Democrats fortunes across the country tank. Then the Job's decision

0:03:53.040 --> 0:03:56.480
<v Speaker 1>coming out, and now I agree with Mike that it

0:03:56.560 --> 0:03:58.920
<v Speaker 1>is reverting to sort of a normal midterm. But I'm

0:03:58.920 --> 0:04:01.160
<v Speaker 1>gonna add one more use of bad news and there

0:04:01.160 --> 0:04:04.920
<v Speaker 1>for Democrats, which is something that I've heard from people

0:04:04.920 --> 0:04:07.480
<v Speaker 1>on battleground races across the country, which is the things

0:04:07.520 --> 0:04:10.360
<v Speaker 1>that keep them up at night are one, gas prices

0:04:10.440 --> 0:04:13.560
<v Speaker 1>and to a COVID search. And I don't want to

0:04:14.440 --> 0:04:18.000
<v Speaker 1>universalize my own experience too much, but I just personally

0:04:18.080 --> 0:04:22.360
<v Speaker 1>just tested positive for COVID an hour ago. Oh gosh,

0:04:22.400 --> 0:04:25.719
<v Speaker 1>this just endless justin I'm gonna put my mask on

0:04:25.920 --> 0:04:29.239
<v Speaker 1>right here, and I gotta tell you, I'm hearing um

0:04:29.240 --> 0:04:31.560
<v Speaker 1>from doctors and people across the country, like I see

0:04:31.600 --> 0:04:35.040
<v Speaker 1>us just filling up. And I think if you add inflation,

0:04:35.200 --> 0:04:40.080
<v Speaker 1>gas prices, COVID surging onto everything that it is. You know,

0:04:40.200 --> 0:04:43.080
<v Speaker 1>it's looking like a typical midterms, which is bad news

0:04:43.120 --> 0:04:46.200
<v Speaker 1>for Democrats. Yeah, you know, I feel like the timing

0:04:46.279 --> 0:04:49.120
<v Speaker 1>on these economic issues, Brian could not be worse with

0:04:49.160 --> 0:04:51.279
<v Speaker 1>the Democrats. I even read a piece this morning I

0:04:51.320 --> 0:04:55.040
<v Speaker 1>forget where because I read so much about inflation numbers

0:04:55.080 --> 0:04:58.880
<v Speaker 1>sort of in just a few months kind of leveling off,

0:04:58.920 --> 0:05:02.080
<v Speaker 1>but not in time for the mid terms. So do

0:05:02.160 --> 0:05:05.240
<v Speaker 1>you agree with Liz that we've got gas prices, inflation,

0:05:05.320 --> 0:05:08.600
<v Speaker 1>and potentially a COVID surge and that's going to really

0:05:08.680 --> 0:05:13.560
<v Speaker 1>serve to bury the Democrats. Yeah, I'm pretty pessimistic. I'm

0:05:13.600 --> 0:05:16.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm a Democrat now, I'm no longer a journalist covering

0:05:16.560 --> 0:05:20.640
<v Speaker 1>this stuff. And you know, in in life as in politics,

0:05:20.720 --> 0:05:24.440
<v Speaker 1>timing is everything. And the Democrats were in a pretty

0:05:24.440 --> 0:05:27.880
<v Speaker 1>good position to win the election that didn't happen in

0:05:27.920 --> 0:05:31.560
<v Speaker 1>early September. Um, they're in a pretty crappy position for

0:05:31.600 --> 0:05:35.239
<v Speaker 1>the election that is actually happening. Um in a few weeks.

0:05:35.800 --> 0:05:39.040
<v Speaker 1>You have gas prices going up again, you have a

0:05:39.080 --> 0:05:42.920
<v Speaker 1>failure of the party to drive an effective economic contrast,

0:05:43.040 --> 0:05:45.960
<v Speaker 1>and that and not row is the number one issue.

0:05:46.279 --> 0:05:49.559
<v Speaker 1>Two thirds of Americans think the economy is getting worse.

0:05:49.640 --> 0:05:52.600
<v Speaker 1>Three quarters think that we're on the wrong track. This

0:05:52.680 --> 0:05:56.160
<v Speaker 1>is a recipe for, as Mike said, a typical mid

0:05:56.240 --> 0:05:59.960
<v Speaker 1>term year with you know, substantial losses for the Democrats.

0:06:00.440 --> 0:06:04.200
<v Speaker 1>Why haven't the Democrats lis been able to make a

0:06:04.279 --> 0:06:08.599
<v Speaker 1>compelling argument about the economy. It seems that they have

0:06:08.800 --> 0:06:13.960
<v Speaker 1>almost abdicated this whole economic issue. I know traditionally voters

0:06:14.000 --> 0:06:17.640
<v Speaker 1>inc Republicans do a better job handling the economy, but

0:06:17.720 --> 0:06:21.680
<v Speaker 1>it seems like the Democrats are coming up slightly empty

0:06:21.760 --> 0:06:24.440
<v Speaker 1>handed to me and correct me if I'm wrong. So

0:06:24.680 --> 0:06:27.039
<v Speaker 1>I look, I agree with that. I think it's the

0:06:27.080 --> 0:06:30.159
<v Speaker 1>results of a couple of things. And one is that

0:06:30.480 --> 0:06:33.360
<v Speaker 1>a lot of these economic issues, whether it's either whether

0:06:33.400 --> 0:06:37.000
<v Speaker 1>it's inflation or gas prices, it's largely out of you know,

0:06:37.080 --> 0:06:41.640
<v Speaker 1>any one person, anyone political parties control. So there is

0:06:41.680 --> 0:06:45.720
<v Speaker 1>sort of you know, hesitance to about how to communicate

0:06:45.720 --> 0:06:48.000
<v Speaker 1>about that because it is out of people's control. And

0:06:48.360 --> 0:06:51.159
<v Speaker 1>we know that, um, one day gas prices can be

0:06:51.200 --> 0:06:53.800
<v Speaker 1>low and the next day Saudi Arabia can make an

0:06:53.839 --> 0:06:57.520
<v Speaker 1>announcement right before the midterms that can um cause gas

0:06:57.520 --> 0:07:02.080
<v Speaker 1>prices to spike again. The seconding is. Look, a lot

0:07:02.120 --> 0:07:04.240
<v Speaker 1>of Democrats did sort of put all their eggs in

0:07:04.279 --> 0:07:08.080
<v Speaker 1>the Row basket, and um, when the Dobs decision came out,

0:07:08.320 --> 0:07:11.960
<v Speaker 1>we really saw a surge of enthusiasm there. And I

0:07:12.080 --> 0:07:14.920
<v Speaker 1>still think ROW is gonna be really important, but it

0:07:14.960 --> 0:07:17.560
<v Speaker 1>does make me a little bit nervous, whether I'm in

0:07:17.600 --> 0:07:20.160
<v Speaker 1>New York or I was in Michigan last weekend, and

0:07:20.200 --> 0:07:23.640
<v Speaker 1>I look at all the Democrats ads, and I gotta say,

0:07:24.080 --> 0:07:27.160
<v Speaker 1>of them are about ROW, and I just I have

0:07:27.280 --> 0:07:30.000
<v Speaker 1>heard less and less about it from voters, from friends

0:07:30.040 --> 0:07:33.200
<v Speaker 1>who are outside of politics, and more about inflation and

0:07:33.200 --> 0:07:36.040
<v Speaker 1>gas prices. And you know, I personally would like to

0:07:36.080 --> 0:07:38.800
<v Speaker 1>see more Democrats going out there and saying we feel

0:07:38.800 --> 0:07:41.680
<v Speaker 1>your pain. We haven't gotten everything right, but we are

0:07:41.800 --> 0:07:44.640
<v Speaker 1>trying to lower your costs. We did the Inflation Reduction Act,

0:07:44.680 --> 0:07:47.480
<v Speaker 1>which is gonna allow Medicare to negotiate for lower gas prices,

0:07:47.520 --> 0:07:50.720
<v Speaker 1>cap the price of insulin. We voted to import b

0:07:50.920 --> 0:07:53.920
<v Speaker 1>BE formula, which Republicans opposed. We vote to do this that,

0:07:54.360 --> 0:07:56.440
<v Speaker 1>and to say at least we are trying, whereas the

0:07:56.440 --> 0:07:58.800
<v Speaker 1>Republicans are trying to make your life miserable and hope

0:07:58.800 --> 0:08:01.360
<v Speaker 1>that it helps them win, but we have heard less

0:08:01.400 --> 0:08:04.120
<v Speaker 1>of that messaging. And part of the reason for that

0:08:04.200 --> 0:08:06.560
<v Speaker 1>is because it's more remote. Drug prices aren't going to

0:08:06.600 --> 0:08:09.800
<v Speaker 1>get lower tomorrow. It's gonna happen after the election. So

0:08:10.200 --> 0:08:14.160
<v Speaker 1>the immediate economic concerns and voters have are harder for

0:08:14.240 --> 0:08:17.800
<v Speaker 1>Democrats to address. Yeah, I think the problem is inflation

0:08:17.920 --> 0:08:20.840
<v Speaker 1>is a politician killer because it breaks through all the

0:08:20.920 --> 0:08:23.760
<v Speaker 1>talk and the three dimensional chess. You go to the

0:08:23.760 --> 0:08:26.480
<v Speaker 1>grocery store and like you look at like a year ago,

0:08:26.640 --> 0:08:29.040
<v Speaker 1>I was buying the same stuff for a lot less.

0:08:29.080 --> 0:08:31.680
<v Speaker 1>So every week you get kicked there. Then you get

0:08:31.760 --> 0:08:35.199
<v Speaker 1>kicked at the gas pump, and so those two things

0:08:35.280 --> 0:08:38.200
<v Speaker 1>breakthrough all that. I've got a nine point plan or

0:08:38.240 --> 0:08:40.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, and it's like, you know what, Trump might

0:08:40.679 --> 0:08:43.000
<v Speaker 1>have been crazy, but when he was in I wasn't

0:08:43.000 --> 0:08:46.240
<v Speaker 1>getting slaughtered like this. And older people are looking at

0:08:46.240 --> 0:08:49.040
<v Speaker 1>their F one case and the stock market bouncing around,

0:08:49.440 --> 0:08:52.720
<v Speaker 1>so it's nothing but pain and they're doing what vote.

0:08:52.720 --> 0:08:54.840
<v Speaker 1>You know, everybody talks about a blue wave, it's not

0:08:54.920 --> 0:08:57.400
<v Speaker 1>really it's the mid term wave. It can change color.

0:08:57.920 --> 0:09:01.560
<v Speaker 1>It's tell the boss I'm unhappy, and Americans love doing that.

0:09:01.640 --> 0:09:04.560
<v Speaker 1>We love changing the channel we love playing the pushing

0:09:04.600 --> 0:09:07.400
<v Speaker 1>the eject button. And that's what's coming. And the only

0:09:07.480 --> 0:09:10.240
<v Speaker 1>question is in a few of these close Senate races

0:09:10.280 --> 0:09:13.520
<v Speaker 1>that the Republicans should be running away with, will the

0:09:13.640 --> 0:09:18.000
<v Speaker 1>Republican candidates are under performing allow a Democrat to win

0:09:18.120 --> 0:09:20.320
<v Speaker 1>in a year when they have no business winning. The

0:09:20.360 --> 0:09:22.400
<v Speaker 1>House is gone? You know, I think that's over with,

0:09:22.440 --> 0:09:24.960
<v Speaker 1>it's gone. Well. I want to talk about that in

0:09:24.960 --> 0:09:28.120
<v Speaker 1>the role Marjorie Taylor Green may have if in fact

0:09:28.400 --> 0:09:32.800
<v Speaker 1>a Republican majority is in the House. But first, um,

0:09:32.840 --> 0:09:36.439
<v Speaker 1>you know, James Carville said, Republicans are hoping that women

0:09:36.480 --> 0:09:40.040
<v Speaker 1>have a short attention span. We saw a really remarkable

0:09:40.080 --> 0:09:43.040
<v Speaker 1>thing happen in Kansas in early August when it came

0:09:43.080 --> 0:09:47.080
<v Speaker 1>to codifying the constitution right for getting rid of the

0:09:47.320 --> 0:09:51.920
<v Speaker 1>protection for choice in Kansas, pretty ruby red state, right,

0:09:52.320 --> 0:09:57.440
<v Speaker 1>So women were incredibly organized. The turnout was enormous. Do

0:09:58.320 --> 0:10:01.000
<v Speaker 1>American women have a short attend and span? I mean,

0:10:01.160 --> 0:10:03.840
<v Speaker 1>I guess that's the question. Or does the economy and

0:10:03.840 --> 0:10:08.040
<v Speaker 1>those prices at the grocery during gas station overwhelmed the

0:10:08.120 --> 0:10:10.960
<v Speaker 1>desire for reproductive rights in this country? What say you,

0:10:11.000 --> 0:10:16.200
<v Speaker 1>Brian Goldsmith? You know, a friend of mine said, the

0:10:16.240 --> 0:10:19.080
<v Speaker 1>Democrats were hoping for Revember and it might have just

0:10:19.160 --> 0:10:23.360
<v Speaker 1>been raugust, and you know, that's that's a problem. I

0:10:23.400 --> 0:10:27.560
<v Speaker 1>mean in Kansas, people were just voting up or down

0:10:27.679 --> 0:10:30.560
<v Speaker 1>on that one issue, and that is fundamentally different than

0:10:30.640 --> 0:10:32.520
<v Speaker 1>voting for a candidate for the Senate, where you've got

0:10:32.520 --> 0:10:36.000
<v Speaker 1>a whole range of issues on the ballot um, including

0:10:36.440 --> 0:10:39.160
<v Speaker 1>the economy and the cost of living and this stuff

0:10:39.200 --> 0:10:41.960
<v Speaker 1>that just kind of punches you in the face every

0:10:42.000 --> 0:10:45.000
<v Speaker 1>single day. People aren't out there trying, um, you know,

0:10:45.600 --> 0:10:48.520
<v Speaker 1>most people to get an abortion every single day, but

0:10:48.559 --> 0:10:51.880
<v Speaker 1>they are shopping for gas and groceries and and so

0:10:52.440 --> 0:10:56.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, to Mike's point, the economy is not something

0:10:56.240 --> 0:10:58.280
<v Speaker 1>that you can change between now in the election, but

0:10:58.360 --> 0:11:00.480
<v Speaker 1>that doesn't mean that there isn't any thing you can

0:11:00.520 --> 0:11:02.800
<v Speaker 1>do if you're a Democrat. And I worry our party

0:11:02.800 --> 0:11:06.679
<v Speaker 1>has failed to learn the lessons of President Obama's reelection

0:11:06.760 --> 0:11:10.560
<v Speaker 1>in twelve, which Liz played an integral role in where

0:11:10.679 --> 0:11:14.960
<v Speaker 1>you had, uh, you know, mediocre to bad economy that

0:11:15.040 --> 0:11:18.760
<v Speaker 1>people were feeling um and Obama was in charge, but

0:11:18.880 --> 0:11:22.360
<v Speaker 1>he was able to drive a contrast about who's fighting

0:11:22.400 --> 0:11:25.640
<v Speaker 1>to make the economy work for people like me, and

0:11:25.640 --> 0:11:29.720
<v Speaker 1>and that's the contrast that I don't see out there. Yeah,

0:11:29.840 --> 0:11:31.880
<v Speaker 1>and just to add to that, as the only woman

0:11:31.960 --> 0:11:34.560
<v Speaker 1>besides the U Katie on the call, and I would say, yes,

0:11:34.640 --> 0:11:38.200
<v Speaker 1>we um, I improved positive that women can have short

0:11:38.240 --> 0:11:43.440
<v Speaker 1>attention spans, UM, but women can also be multitaskers. And

0:11:43.800 --> 0:11:49.000
<v Speaker 1>women are also responsible for balancing their families checkbooks, for

0:11:49.200 --> 0:11:52.439
<v Speaker 1>you know, filling up their gas tanks, for shopping for groceries.

0:11:52.920 --> 0:11:55.839
<v Speaker 1>And these are UM things that they're seeing every day

0:11:55.880 --> 0:11:58.679
<v Speaker 1>as well. So while you would think, okay, a fundamental

0:11:58.800 --> 0:12:01.600
<v Speaker 1>right is on the line, that's number one thing, it

0:12:01.760 --> 0:12:04.880
<v Speaker 1>is really hard to keep the focus on ROW when

0:12:04.920 --> 0:12:07.280
<v Speaker 1>I think, as Mike said, you know, gas prices and

0:12:07.320 --> 0:12:10.120
<v Speaker 1>the price of milk and whatever it is is hitting

0:12:10.120 --> 0:12:14.000
<v Speaker 1>in the face UM every day. And so in places,

0:12:14.040 --> 0:12:17.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, to Brian's point, um, like Kansas, where that's

0:12:17.400 --> 0:12:20.640
<v Speaker 1>the thing on the ballot. In places like Michigan where

0:12:20.679 --> 0:12:23.480
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna have that on the ballot, it ROW might

0:12:23.520 --> 0:12:27.000
<v Speaker 1>be more of a factor because they have um an

0:12:27.040 --> 0:12:32.280
<v Speaker 1>initiative they're about whether to overturn a complete ban on abortion.

0:12:32.640 --> 0:12:34.720
<v Speaker 1>So there it's on the ballot and it's literally in

0:12:34.720 --> 0:12:36.839
<v Speaker 1>your face. But a lot of other states, like if

0:12:36.880 --> 0:12:39.960
<v Speaker 1>you live in New York, you know that our state

0:12:40.040 --> 0:12:43.040
<v Speaker 1>law is very strong and protecting a woman's right to choose.

0:12:43.360 --> 0:12:47.240
<v Speaker 1>There are seven battleground house races here that then row

0:12:47.360 --> 0:12:49.800
<v Speaker 1>is probably gonna take a back seat. If you live

0:12:49.800 --> 0:12:53.080
<v Speaker 1>in Arizona, row and abortion have never been in the

0:12:53.120 --> 0:12:56.840
<v Speaker 1>top five issues issues for voters. Yeah, but what about

0:12:56.880 --> 0:13:00.480
<v Speaker 1>this national abortion band that all the republic kids are

0:13:00.480 --> 0:13:04.200
<v Speaker 1>talking about. To me, that really increases the urgency of

0:13:04.240 --> 0:13:07.760
<v Speaker 1>this issue a little more than normal, does it? Not? Look?

0:13:07.840 --> 0:13:09.800
<v Speaker 1>I sort of agree, But I also think we have

0:13:09.840 --> 0:13:12.400
<v Speaker 1>to realize that we deal with the electorate as it is,

0:13:12.520 --> 0:13:14.960
<v Speaker 1>not as it should be. And I agree, I think

0:13:14.960 --> 0:13:17.800
<v Speaker 1>that these things should matter more. But it goes to

0:13:17.840 --> 0:13:20.200
<v Speaker 1>show you that with a lot of voters, the things

0:13:20.200 --> 0:13:21.920
<v Speaker 1>that matter most are the things that are right in

0:13:21.920 --> 0:13:24.040
<v Speaker 1>front of their face. They don't think in terms of

0:13:24.080 --> 0:13:26.440
<v Speaker 1>the long term, right right, And I think that's true

0:13:26.440 --> 0:13:29.440
<v Speaker 1>of everything might go ahead. Yeah, there's also what's the

0:13:29.480 --> 0:13:33.560
<v Speaker 1>most invisible group in American pop culture, pro life women.

0:13:34.160 --> 0:13:36.480
<v Speaker 1>One out of six voters is a pro life female,

0:13:36.800 --> 0:13:39.240
<v Speaker 1>the most pro choice group in America. By the way,

0:13:39.520 --> 0:13:41.400
<v Speaker 1>You know, we always say women. No, it's young men

0:13:42.000 --> 0:13:43.920
<v Speaker 1>who also don't vote in the off Your election is

0:13:43.960 --> 0:13:46.440
<v Speaker 1>a real question about row is well, young men who

0:13:46.440 --> 0:13:49.959
<v Speaker 1>tell democratic and are over very pro choice in most

0:13:50.000 --> 0:13:53.600
<v Speaker 1>places show up. You know what's happened is or and

0:13:53.600 --> 0:13:55.880
<v Speaker 1>and and Liz is right. There are plenty of states

0:13:55.880 --> 0:13:58.400
<v Speaker 1>where it's a little bit settled. The Nevada center race,

0:13:58.440 --> 0:14:00.920
<v Speaker 1>which doesn't get a lot of attention because decide the Senate.

0:14:01.440 --> 0:14:05.000
<v Speaker 1>They've got a constitutional prohibition there. So it's not killing

0:14:05.000 --> 0:14:08.360
<v Speaker 1>Adam Laxalt the way the Democratic incumbent thought in a

0:14:08.440 --> 0:14:10.360
<v Speaker 1>very pro choice state, I think he's gonna beat her

0:14:10.400 --> 0:14:14.679
<v Speaker 1>and pick up that seat. So between gas and groceries

0:14:15.520 --> 0:14:19.000
<v Speaker 1>and the fact that it's not as overwhelmingly an eight

0:14:19.160 --> 0:14:23.240
<v Speaker 1>twenty issue among the population, and in those swing seats,

0:14:23.400 --> 0:14:26.280
<v Speaker 1>it's more pro choice than pro life, but it's not

0:14:26.320 --> 0:14:28.120
<v Speaker 1>the hammer. In some places, it's not seen as a

0:14:28.160 --> 0:14:31.600
<v Speaker 1>top issue. The New New York Times poll of people

0:14:31.600 --> 0:14:34.680
<v Speaker 1>say the economy, only eight percent say abortion rights. Well,

0:14:34.720 --> 0:14:37.600
<v Speaker 1>what about this national band, Brian? Is that looming in

0:14:37.640 --> 0:14:40.040
<v Speaker 1>the minds of voters? You think in some ways, if

0:14:40.080 --> 0:14:43.880
<v Speaker 1>the you know, Republicans take the Senate, they're gonna start

0:14:44.160 --> 0:14:48.120
<v Speaker 1>working on that, I think pretty prompto. Right, I'm not sure.

0:14:48.280 --> 0:14:51.520
<v Speaker 1>I didn't see a lot of enthusiasm from Mitch McConnell

0:14:51.720 --> 0:14:54.600
<v Speaker 1>for a national abortion band. He may be kind of

0:14:54.600 --> 0:14:57.480
<v Speaker 1>forced into it by a majority of his caucus, just

0:14:57.520 --> 0:14:59.560
<v Speaker 1>as he's been forced into a whole bunch of stuff

0:14:59.760 --> 0:15:04.560
<v Speaker 1>that he hasn't necessarily personally wanted to do. But you know,

0:15:04.880 --> 0:15:07.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure that that's going to be the election driver.

0:15:07.800 --> 0:15:11.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the outcome of elections is as much about

0:15:11.800 --> 0:15:16.240
<v Speaker 1>what is the issue territory you're fighting on as what

0:15:16.400 --> 0:15:20.480
<v Speaker 1>each side says. And if we close this election on

0:15:20.760 --> 0:15:27.240
<v Speaker 1>inflation and crime and perceptions about the direction of the economy,

0:15:27.280 --> 0:15:30.920
<v Speaker 1>a lot of very flawed Republican candidates are going to

0:15:31.040 --> 0:15:33.920
<v Speaker 1>get in because they have the edge on those issues. Well,

0:15:34.000 --> 0:15:36.680
<v Speaker 1>let's talk about that. Let's talk about the Trump factor

0:15:36.840 --> 0:15:41.040
<v Speaker 1>and the Biden factor. How effective has Trump been in

0:15:41.200 --> 0:15:44.680
<v Speaker 1>terms of his endorsements of various candidates, Mike, I mean,

0:15:45.040 --> 0:15:48.160
<v Speaker 1>he is still the standard bearer of the Republican Party.

0:15:48.800 --> 0:15:52.880
<v Speaker 1>Is he helping hurting? Is it a wash? Well, in

0:15:53.040 --> 0:15:56.200
<v Speaker 1>most primaries he helps a lot. But once you get

0:15:56.280 --> 0:15:58.720
<v Speaker 1>him out of the primary world, you know, then then

0:15:58.760 --> 0:16:00.920
<v Speaker 1>he's on a planet where he can barely breathe, and

0:16:01.040 --> 0:16:05.280
<v Speaker 1>any swing general election, he's a problem, you know, where

0:16:05.320 --> 0:16:08.280
<v Speaker 1>both parties are competitive, and those suburban congressional stage is

0:16:08.320 --> 0:16:10.440
<v Speaker 1>a problem. You know, you don't see all these candidates

0:16:10.520 --> 0:16:12.480
<v Speaker 1>running to him. Now, we have a few candidates who

0:16:12.520 --> 0:16:15.480
<v Speaker 1>win a primary and are clueless and are running the

0:16:15.520 --> 0:16:17.800
<v Speaker 1>general election like a Republican primary. So there are a

0:16:17.800 --> 0:16:20.800
<v Speaker 1>few places, even in this wave where a Democrat who

0:16:20.800 --> 0:16:23.680
<v Speaker 1>auto loses seat may win on that. But but Trump

0:16:23.760 --> 0:16:25.480
<v Speaker 1>is an anchor around the neck of the party in

0:16:25.480 --> 0:16:27.480
<v Speaker 1>a general election. The problem is he is a need

0:16:27.520 --> 0:16:29.720
<v Speaker 1>to be in the center of everything. So he's kind

0:16:29.720 --> 0:16:32.480
<v Speaker 1>of the unwanted guest who shows up and you know,

0:16:32.600 --> 0:16:35.360
<v Speaker 1>what do you do? Speaking of the anchor, let's talk

0:16:35.400 --> 0:16:39.000
<v Speaker 1>about the anchor lady running for governor in the state

0:16:39.000 --> 0:16:42.200
<v Speaker 1>of Arizona, Carry Lake, who is sort of the new

0:16:42.280 --> 0:16:44.600
<v Speaker 1>face of Trump is hum And I don't know if

0:16:44.600 --> 0:16:47.960
<v Speaker 1>you all watched Dana Bash interview her on on State

0:16:48.000 --> 0:16:50.800
<v Speaker 1>of the Union on Sunday. I thought Danna did a real,

0:16:51.520 --> 0:16:54.760
<v Speaker 1>really incredible job. She kept calling her Dana, I think

0:16:54.840 --> 0:16:56.640
<v Speaker 1>to get under her skin. I don't know if you

0:16:56.800 --> 0:17:00.200
<v Speaker 1>noticed that. And she kind of interchanged Dana and Dana. Dana,

0:17:00.200 --> 0:17:02.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna have to disagree with you on the figure

0:17:02.080 --> 0:17:05.040
<v Speaker 1>you just put out. The real issue, Dana is that

0:17:05.119 --> 0:17:08.679
<v Speaker 1>the people don't trust. The question is are you undermining

0:17:08.800 --> 0:17:16.320
<v Speaker 1>faith and elections by saying that election was stolen when

0:17:16.359 --> 0:17:21.719
<v Speaker 1>there's absolutely no evidence to support that. Dana, You know

0:17:22.040 --> 0:17:26.879
<v Speaker 1>she is really embracing Trump and vice versa. So what

0:17:27.000 --> 0:17:30.200
<v Speaker 1>do you see going on there? Well? I think that, um,

0:17:30.359 --> 0:17:34.120
<v Speaker 1>she's been a really fascinating candidate because unlike a lot

0:17:34.200 --> 0:17:37.240
<v Speaker 1>of the other sort of Trump indoors senate candidates this

0:17:37.320 --> 0:17:41.560
<v Speaker 1>cycle who run away from the press, don't really communicate

0:17:41.600 --> 0:17:44.440
<v Speaker 1>with the public, sort of hide the ball, She's been

0:17:44.560 --> 0:17:48.359
<v Speaker 1>very full frontal in her campaigning, both with voters traveling

0:17:48.400 --> 0:17:51.679
<v Speaker 1>around the state and with local and national media. And

0:17:51.760 --> 0:17:55.720
<v Speaker 1>she has that same feral magnetism to her that Donald

0:17:55.760 --> 0:17:58.480
<v Speaker 1>Trump does, and sort of a knowledge of how to

0:17:58.560 --> 0:18:02.200
<v Speaker 1>work a stage, how to work the media. That's interesting

0:18:02.320 --> 0:18:06.280
<v Speaker 1>feral magnetism. Yeah, but there is something, there is something

0:18:06.320 --> 0:18:08.639
<v Speaker 1>to when you see her work a stage that you

0:18:08.760 --> 0:18:11.600
<v Speaker 1>don't quite have with the Hershel Walker, you don't have

0:18:11.760 --> 0:18:16.160
<v Speaker 1>with a Doug Mastriano or Blake Masters, And it's why

0:18:16.600 --> 0:18:19.080
<v Speaker 1>I think that she will be one of the you know,

0:18:19.119 --> 0:18:23.119
<v Speaker 1>election deniers who slips through on the gubernatorial level. But

0:18:23.200 --> 0:18:26.040
<v Speaker 1>she sort of perfected Trump is m and figured out

0:18:26.359 --> 0:18:30.240
<v Speaker 1>how to take the crazy um and what I view

0:18:30.359 --> 0:18:33.239
<v Speaker 1>is crazy and how to sort of soft sell it

0:18:33.320 --> 0:18:36.320
<v Speaker 1>in these interviews, and certainly with Dana Bash. I mean,

0:18:36.400 --> 0:18:39.240
<v Speaker 1>you saw just how slippery she was. One of the

0:18:39.280 --> 0:18:41.800
<v Speaker 1>problems there, right, is that we don't have the strongest

0:18:41.840 --> 0:18:44.080
<v Speaker 1>of Democratic candidates, sir, I'll just put it that way.

0:18:44.560 --> 0:18:48.800
<v Speaker 1>And she refuses to um debate Carrie Lake, which I think,

0:18:48.960 --> 0:18:52.240
<v Speaker 1>why is she doing that? Her her opponent, and that's

0:18:52.280 --> 0:18:55.840
<v Speaker 1>the Secretary state, right, Lady Hobbs. Yeah, she's a train

0:18:55.840 --> 0:18:58.480
<v Speaker 1>wreck of a candidate. That's the problem. They've They've got

0:18:58.480 --> 0:19:01.240
<v Speaker 1>a slow pony, a train wreck of a candidate. She's

0:19:01.359 --> 0:19:04.000
<v Speaker 1>really turned out to be a dud. And that's given

0:19:04.040 --> 0:19:05.920
<v Speaker 1>the race to carry Lake in a state that is

0:19:06.040 --> 0:19:10.000
<v Speaker 1>very wave affected. Yeah, and if you've been a major

0:19:10.119 --> 0:19:14.359
<v Speaker 1>market local TV news anchor for twenty years, that is

0:19:14.400 --> 0:19:18.760
<v Speaker 1>pretty darn good preparation for running for office and being

0:19:19.320 --> 0:19:22.800
<v Speaker 1>slick on the receiving end of TV interviews and and

0:19:22.880 --> 0:19:26.320
<v Speaker 1>knowing how to make an appearance that's effective. And you know,

0:19:26.400 --> 0:19:30.520
<v Speaker 1>there's just no comparison in terms of candidate skills her.

0:19:30.720 --> 0:19:34.320
<v Speaker 1>She's a great retail politician, whatever you think. And she

0:19:34.400 --> 0:19:36.800
<v Speaker 1>has the best zoom filter in the business. The interview

0:19:36.840 --> 0:19:40.800
<v Speaker 1>is real hilarious because there's about filters on the camera.

0:19:40.960 --> 0:19:44.720
<v Speaker 1>She stole it. She stole it from Barbara Walters. It's unbelievable.

0:19:44.720 --> 0:19:48.040
<v Speaker 1>You can't see a poor Yeah, is that true? Yes,

0:19:48.160 --> 0:19:50.840
<v Speaker 1>you gotta see it. But I also think, Katie, maybe

0:19:50.840 --> 0:19:54.240
<v Speaker 1>we've found the next chapter for you. Oh oh, I

0:19:54.440 --> 0:19:57.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't think so. I try to get think about

0:19:57.119 --> 0:20:00.520
<v Speaker 1>running for office. I I seriously did she She won't

0:20:00.560 --> 0:20:06.360
<v Speaker 1>consider it. Sadly, my skin is too thin for that.

0:20:07.840 --> 0:20:10.200
<v Speaker 1>When we come back, did you know more than two

0:20:10.320 --> 0:20:13.800
<v Speaker 1>hundred election deniers are running for office up and down

0:20:13.800 --> 0:20:17.840
<v Speaker 1>the ballot. We talk about what that means for our democracy.

0:20:18.200 --> 0:20:31.080
<v Speaker 1>Right after this, can we just talk about a few

0:20:31.080 --> 0:20:35.400
<v Speaker 1>other races where the Trump factor has helped jd vance.

0:20:35.480 --> 0:20:39.520
<v Speaker 1>Obviously wouldn't be getting as much traction as he is,

0:20:39.600 --> 0:20:41.959
<v Speaker 1>and I know he didn't do very well in that debate.

0:20:42.040 --> 0:20:45.320
<v Speaker 1>Tim Ryan kind of ate his lunch, but isn't he

0:20:45.400 --> 0:20:48.560
<v Speaker 1>still favorite? Dwyn in Ohio guys. I would argue it

0:20:48.640 --> 0:20:52.400
<v Speaker 1>slightly differently. If it weren't for Trump, the Republican would

0:20:52.400 --> 0:20:55.080
<v Speaker 1>be running away with a lot of these races. I mean,

0:20:55.200 --> 0:20:58.280
<v Speaker 1>David McCormick in Pennsylvania I think would be up five

0:20:58.400 --> 0:21:03.199
<v Speaker 1>or ten over Betterman. It's it's because Trump pushed a

0:21:03.200 --> 0:21:06.919
<v Speaker 1>lot of very flawed Republican candidates, you know, to the

0:21:07.000 --> 0:21:10.240
<v Speaker 1>nomination that a lot of these races that, as Mike says,

0:21:10.240 --> 0:21:15.119
<v Speaker 1>are very way susceptible, are actually competitive, helpful in the primary,

0:21:15.200 --> 0:21:20.199
<v Speaker 1>hurtful in the general. Exactly. It totally true. Vance is

0:21:20.240 --> 0:21:24.600
<v Speaker 1>a terrible candidate. Ryan is running the best Democratic swing

0:21:24.680 --> 0:21:27.120
<v Speaker 1>state campaign in the country for a Democrat. Now he's

0:21:27.119 --> 0:21:30.280
<v Speaker 1>breaking all the d n C rules and he's running

0:21:30.280 --> 0:21:33.119
<v Speaker 1>as kind of a lunch pail, a little more culturally conservative.

0:21:33.200 --> 0:21:36.360
<v Speaker 1>There's a lot of kind of keeping his distance from Biden,

0:21:36.560 --> 0:21:40.639
<v Speaker 1>right and saying we need we don't need an ass kisser,

0:21:40.680 --> 0:21:43.160
<v Speaker 1>we need an ass kicker, which was a pretty good line.

0:21:43.160 --> 0:21:48.280
<v Speaker 1>You gotta admit that said, this is an election where

0:21:48.400 --> 0:21:50.720
<v Speaker 1>boxing hammers can win Ohio if they've got an hour

0:21:50.760 --> 0:21:52.639
<v Speaker 1>after it. So I think it'll be closer than it

0:21:52.960 --> 0:21:55.760
<v Speaker 1>ought to be, and maybe he'll do the upset of

0:21:55.800 --> 0:21:58.639
<v Speaker 1>the century there, but he's going to need more of

0:21:58.640 --> 0:22:01.000
<v Speaker 1>a lead than he has right now. But it goes

0:22:01.040 --> 0:22:03.480
<v Speaker 1>back to what um and I agree with Mike, but

0:22:03.520 --> 0:22:05.960
<v Speaker 1>it goes back to what Brian was saying, which is

0:22:06.000 --> 0:22:09.960
<v Speaker 1>that so few Democrats are really weaponizing the economic case.

0:22:10.320 --> 0:22:14.240
<v Speaker 1>Tim is an exception. Um. He from the day after

0:22:14.480 --> 0:22:18.000
<v Speaker 1>j D won the primary, started running ads talking about

0:22:18.000 --> 0:22:20.520
<v Speaker 1>how j D turned his back on the state of Ohio,

0:22:20.840 --> 0:22:23.560
<v Speaker 1>moved to Silicon Valley, made all this money is coming

0:22:23.560 --> 0:22:26.720
<v Speaker 1>back is funded by these billionaires. And it does remind

0:22:26.720 --> 0:22:29.919
<v Speaker 1>me a little bit more of the messaging that Barack

0:22:29.920 --> 0:22:34.280
<v Speaker 1>Obama used very effectively against Mitt Romney in which is

0:22:34.320 --> 0:22:36.680
<v Speaker 1>to make the Republicans seem like they're the ones out

0:22:36.720 --> 0:22:38.879
<v Speaker 1>of touch and that they're going to be disasters for

0:22:38.960 --> 0:22:41.960
<v Speaker 1>your family. And that's one of the reasons why he's

0:22:41.960 --> 0:22:45.280
<v Speaker 1>been able to hang tough in there. But there's no

0:22:45.359 --> 0:22:47.600
<v Speaker 1>doubt it is gonna be really, really tough for a

0:22:47.680 --> 0:22:50.760
<v Speaker 1>Democrat to win in this environment in Ohio. How much

0:22:50.840 --> 0:22:53.560
<v Speaker 1>is Biden hurting And I mean, it's so frustrating to

0:22:53.560 --> 0:22:55.960
<v Speaker 1>me that the Democrats seemed to be so feckless on

0:22:56.000 --> 0:22:59.240
<v Speaker 1>the other hand, they've got a Democratic president whose approval

0:22:59.320 --> 0:23:01.879
<v Speaker 1>rating is forty I don't even know what the latest

0:23:01.880 --> 0:23:05.399
<v Speaker 1>approval rating is, forty three, he's creeped up a little,

0:23:05.400 --> 0:23:11.159
<v Speaker 1>but his disapprovals fifty five. So the political majority is unapproved. So, Brian,

0:23:11.200 --> 0:23:14.560
<v Speaker 1>how much of an albatross is Joe Biden? For all

0:23:14.600 --> 0:23:19.840
<v Speaker 1>these Democratic candidates? You see people like Tim Ryan distancing himself. Um,

0:23:19.880 --> 0:23:22.720
<v Speaker 1>that's happened in other races. I think Mark Kelly has

0:23:22.760 --> 0:23:26.000
<v Speaker 1>tried to do that in Arizona and his Senate race. Um.

0:23:26.240 --> 0:23:29.480
<v Speaker 1>But but you know they all have ds after their names.

0:23:29.480 --> 0:23:32.040
<v Speaker 1>How much can they really do that? I mean, no

0:23:32.160 --> 0:23:36.600
<v Speaker 1>more than normal normally in the midterm year, whoever is

0:23:36.640 --> 0:23:41.919
<v Speaker 1>the incumbent president hurts his party a little bit. And

0:23:41.960 --> 0:23:45.719
<v Speaker 1>the intensity of opposition to Joe Biden is not like

0:23:45.840 --> 0:23:49.240
<v Speaker 1>the intensity of opposition to Donald Trump or even the

0:23:49.320 --> 0:23:53.600
<v Speaker 1>intensity of opposition to Barack Obama in two He doesn't

0:23:53.680 --> 0:23:57.280
<v Speaker 1>generate quite that level of vitriol, which is why you're

0:23:57.320 --> 0:24:00.800
<v Speaker 1>seeing a lot of the Republican attack machine go after

0:24:01.280 --> 0:24:06.879
<v Speaker 1>other villains, you know, AOC and even Pelosi and a

0:24:06.880 --> 0:24:10.840
<v Speaker 1>few others. Um, So he doesn't help. But I don't

0:24:10.880 --> 0:24:13.800
<v Speaker 1>think that that is the story of the election. Who's

0:24:13.880 --> 0:24:18.240
<v Speaker 1>a Democratic attack machine going after Well, I think his

0:24:18.320 --> 0:24:21.720
<v Speaker 1>name rhymes with Ronald Shrump, you know, I think. But

0:24:21.760 --> 0:24:25.040
<v Speaker 1>the problem is he's not president. Why is Joe Biden

0:24:25.520 --> 0:24:28.440
<v Speaker 1>so unpopular and have things like the climate bill, the

0:24:28.520 --> 0:24:33.600
<v Speaker 1>student debt cancelation, anything he's done. Why is he still

0:24:34.000 --> 0:24:37.600
<v Speaker 1>so unpopular? Well, you know, he's the Rodney Dangerfield of

0:24:37.600 --> 0:24:41.120
<v Speaker 1>American politics because on the legislative side, he's done really well.

0:24:41.720 --> 0:24:45.680
<v Speaker 1>He has passed more big important bipartisans stuff than any

0:24:45.720 --> 0:24:49.240
<v Speaker 1>president in decades. The Chips Bill is huge. You know,

0:24:49.240 --> 0:24:52.439
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna build semiconductors here and get kind of the

0:24:52.600 --> 0:24:57.000
<v Speaker 1>energy equivalence you know, uh thing for the semis that

0:24:57.040 --> 0:24:59.000
<v Speaker 1>are the key to almost anything we're gonna make in

0:24:59.040 --> 0:25:03.280
<v Speaker 1>the future. Decent gun bill got done, of course, that

0:25:03.359 --> 0:25:06.000
<v Speaker 1>by Parson. Infrastructure bill, one thing after another. I think

0:25:06.000 --> 0:25:09.280
<v Speaker 1>there are two failures though. One is, you know, the

0:25:09.320 --> 0:25:12.200
<v Speaker 1>minute they got infrastructure done, they switched over to hey,

0:25:12.280 --> 0:25:15.880
<v Speaker 1>let's spend World War two level money on being FDR

0:25:16.119 --> 0:25:18.800
<v Speaker 1>And they never got the victory lap they deserved there,

0:25:18.800 --> 0:25:21.040
<v Speaker 1>and they didn't really try to take it. Uh And

0:25:21.160 --> 0:25:23.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, I would be selling the Chips bill like

0:25:23.359 --> 0:25:25.639
<v Speaker 1>the Apollo Project. It is a huge win for a

0:25:25.720 --> 0:25:28.879
<v Speaker 1>hundred thousand dollar year American manufacturing jobs and a hundred

0:25:28.880 --> 0:25:31.760
<v Speaker 1>and sixty issue. Republicans voted no, No, let the Chinese

0:25:31.840 --> 0:25:34.800
<v Speaker 1>run the future. Um, I don't hear that. I don't

0:25:34.840 --> 0:25:38.520
<v Speaker 1>hear any of that stuff. So Biden has not grabbed

0:25:38.520 --> 0:25:41.720
<v Speaker 1>the microphone and done what he could do. Second, when

0:25:41.760 --> 0:25:45.119
<v Speaker 1>you're paying many bar prices for gasoline, the president is

0:25:45.160 --> 0:25:47.359
<v Speaker 1>going to get his butt kicked by the American public.

0:25:47.880 --> 0:25:52.040
<v Speaker 1>And even though Biden didn't do it as the world market,

0:25:52.440 --> 0:25:55.120
<v Speaker 1>but he's got the big job. The big job means

0:25:55.119 --> 0:25:57.520
<v Speaker 1>you get the big blame, I guess. And and third,

0:25:57.760 --> 0:26:01.639
<v Speaker 1>voters rarely vote to say thank you. They write on

0:26:01.680 --> 0:26:04.560
<v Speaker 1>a choice about the future. They don't vote on the past.

0:26:05.000 --> 0:26:07.399
<v Speaker 1>And you all were saying that you didn't think Biden

0:26:07.480 --> 0:26:11.119
<v Speaker 1>or my understanding is you believe that Biden doesn't elicit

0:26:11.320 --> 0:26:16.000
<v Speaker 1>the the hardcore vitriol that say Barack Obama does. But

0:26:16.119 --> 0:26:19.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I was out on Long Island this weekend

0:26:19.240 --> 0:26:23.480
<v Speaker 1>and there was a Lee's Elden caravan of cars with

0:26:23.600 --> 0:26:28.560
<v Speaker 1>a lot of Maggot flags, a lot of Trump flags,

0:26:28.600 --> 0:26:32.320
<v Speaker 1>and a lot of f Joe Biden flags. It was

0:26:32.359 --> 0:26:37.040
<v Speaker 1>so gross. So I do feel like, you know, if

0:26:37.080 --> 0:26:40.840
<v Speaker 1>he is the Rodney danger field of politics that he does.

0:26:41.680 --> 0:26:45.080
<v Speaker 1>Maybe it's just the pro Trump, the hardcore Trump people,

0:26:45.680 --> 0:26:49.080
<v Speaker 1>but I just honestly it's sickened me to see car

0:26:49.160 --> 0:26:55.840
<v Speaker 1>after car with these huge flags that said f Joe Biden. Yeah.

0:26:55.880 --> 0:26:59.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean, look, I think he does elicit UM. Maybe

0:26:59.680 --> 0:27:01.879
<v Speaker 1>not as much as as Barack Obama, maybe not as

0:27:01.880 --> 0:27:04.680
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump, but he does elicit a lot of strong

0:27:04.760 --> 0:27:08.200
<v Speaker 1>feelings from UM, from Republicans. And that's why it's been

0:27:08.560 --> 0:27:11.879
<v Speaker 1>really really smart that unlike Donald Trump, he's sort of

0:27:11.920 --> 0:27:14.600
<v Speaker 1>put his ego in the backseat. You don't see him

0:27:14.640 --> 0:27:16.960
<v Speaker 1>put um sticking his deck out or popping up in

0:27:17.000 --> 0:27:19.639
<v Speaker 1>these states where he is going to be a millstone

0:27:19.680 --> 0:27:22.840
<v Speaker 1>around the neck of Democratic candidates. And the smartest thing

0:27:22.840 --> 0:27:24.840
<v Speaker 1>that Joe Biden can do right now is just go

0:27:25.320 --> 0:27:28.639
<v Speaker 1>be in rooms with rich people and raise UM more money.

0:27:28.680 --> 0:27:32.639
<v Speaker 1>Because part of the reason why Democrats, why their numbers

0:27:32.640 --> 0:27:34.919
<v Speaker 1>are falling in all these races across the country is

0:27:35.240 --> 0:27:39.320
<v Speaker 1>you see the outside groups for Senate Republicans, for Congressional

0:27:39.359 --> 0:27:44.960
<v Speaker 1>Republicans UM spending UM just ungodly. Uh sums of money

0:27:45.080 --> 0:27:49.320
<v Speaker 1>um to defeat the Democrats, and that the cash um

0:27:49.400 --> 0:27:52.960
<v Speaker 1>imbalance is a big problem for Democrats. So that's why

0:27:52.960 --> 0:27:55.160
<v Speaker 1>it's smart of Biden to go to places like Oregon

0:27:55.720 --> 0:27:59.000
<v Speaker 1>or Colorado where he can help. Kamala Harris, you know,

0:27:59.160 --> 0:28:02.159
<v Speaker 1>was in the suburbs of Detroit this past weekend. But

0:28:02.600 --> 0:28:04.800
<v Speaker 1>otherwise it's really smart of Joe Biden to sort of

0:28:05.000 --> 0:28:07.920
<v Speaker 1>take a backseat in this election before we talk about

0:28:07.920 --> 0:28:10.959
<v Speaker 1>some individual races. We got a lot of election deniers

0:28:11.040 --> 0:28:14.320
<v Speaker 1>running out there. We also have secretary of states running

0:28:14.800 --> 0:28:18.879
<v Speaker 1>who basically say the election was rigged and they're going

0:28:18.920 --> 0:28:22.960
<v Speaker 1>to have the power to overturn right, basically essentially the

0:28:23.000 --> 0:28:27.760
<v Speaker 1>will of the people and de facto rigg the next election. Right.

0:28:27.880 --> 0:28:31.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean, how terrifying is that in terms of our

0:28:31.640 --> 0:28:35.960
<v Speaker 1>democratic principles and how much is it going to come

0:28:36.000 --> 0:28:39.880
<v Speaker 1>to fruition if some of these election deniers actually when

0:28:39.960 --> 0:28:44.600
<v Speaker 1>there when their races, Well, it's a problem. And there

0:28:44.640 --> 0:28:48.000
<v Speaker 1>was a headline this morning in the New York Times

0:28:48.040 --> 0:28:51.320
<v Speaker 1>that I thought you saw that for the history books.

0:28:51.320 --> 0:28:54.800
<v Speaker 1>You know, voters see democracy and peril but mostly don't care.

0:28:55.400 --> 0:28:59.840
<v Speaker 1>And I think that is the story that other issues

0:29:00.120 --> 0:29:04.320
<v Speaker 1>taking precedence because you know, abstract, it's not in front

0:29:04.320 --> 0:29:08.560
<v Speaker 1>of their faces. Yeah, little d democratic principles are not

0:29:08.960 --> 0:29:13.320
<v Speaker 1>you know what I'm thinking about as a voter day

0:29:13.360 --> 0:29:17.600
<v Speaker 1>to day. And so yes, there will be election deniers

0:29:18.040 --> 0:29:21.760
<v Speaker 1>swept up in this thing, partly because Trump has made

0:29:21.800 --> 0:29:26.440
<v Speaker 1>that a requirement for not just winning his endorsement, but

0:29:26.440 --> 0:29:30.640
<v Speaker 1>but extinguishing his opposition. I mean he went after yesterday,

0:29:30.680 --> 0:29:35.680
<v Speaker 1>I think or two days ago the Republican nominee for

0:29:35.920 --> 0:29:40.320
<v Speaker 1>Senate in Colorado, which is potentially a very competitive race

0:29:40.880 --> 0:29:45.080
<v Speaker 1>because he'd rather lose than have a Republican who's not

0:29:45.200 --> 0:29:49.040
<v Speaker 1>totally indebted to him. So he's been very effective as

0:29:49.040 --> 0:29:52.440
<v Speaker 1>a sort of neo fascist in taking control of his

0:29:52.560 --> 0:29:56.440
<v Speaker 1>party and punishing people, even people who agree with them

0:29:56.440 --> 0:29:58.480
<v Speaker 1>maybe percent of the time, if they're not going to

0:29:58.560 --> 0:30:01.960
<v Speaker 1>take the full magaline on elections. And Mike, does it

0:30:02.080 --> 0:30:04.600
<v Speaker 1>just freak you out? Oh, I've been freaked out for

0:30:04.640 --> 0:30:07.880
<v Speaker 1>a decade about American politics. But first of all, Trump's

0:30:07.920 --> 0:30:11.520
<v Speaker 1>losing his grip. No, but about democracy, I think it's

0:30:11.520 --> 0:30:14.200
<v Speaker 1>sent a decline. So I we'll see, we'll see new

0:30:14.200 --> 0:30:18.360
<v Speaker 1>primary pull trumpets that means he'd win nomination now but

0:30:18.480 --> 0:30:21.560
<v Speaker 1>it's now what it used to be. So politics is dynamic,

0:30:21.600 --> 0:30:24.480
<v Speaker 1>it's always changing. I worry about democracy, but I don't

0:30:24.520 --> 0:30:27.200
<v Speaker 1>panic about it. We have a huge cultural failure in

0:30:27.240 --> 0:30:29.960
<v Speaker 1>the US. We we've converted politics into a reality show

0:30:30.000 --> 0:30:34.280
<v Speaker 1>with no stakes, real housewives of the presidency, and so

0:30:34.400 --> 0:30:38.160
<v Speaker 1>people have become spectators and they're like, it's all rhetoric.

0:30:38.400 --> 0:30:40.479
<v Speaker 1>They don't believe there's a real threat, because if they

0:30:40.480 --> 0:30:42.760
<v Speaker 1>thought there's a real threat, they do something about it.

0:30:43.000 --> 0:30:46.560
<v Speaker 1>And remember it's tribal. The Democrats all think, you know,

0:30:46.640 --> 0:30:49.760
<v Speaker 1>democracy has gone Trump's gonna goose step into the White House,

0:30:50.120 --> 0:30:52.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, And that's half the vote. The other half

0:30:52.400 --> 0:30:56.240
<v Speaker 1>think maybe of them are worried, the other saying it's rhetoric.

0:30:56.680 --> 0:30:59.440
<v Speaker 1>So the country is not unified on the problem. I

0:30:59.520 --> 0:31:02.880
<v Speaker 1>have some faith, like in the last election, that good

0:31:02.880 --> 0:31:04.920
<v Speaker 1>people in the right places will do the right thing

0:31:04.920 --> 0:31:07.240
<v Speaker 1>in the end. I mean, Trump's thing was thrown out

0:31:07.280 --> 0:31:09.960
<v Speaker 1>by every judge you looked at it. Election officials of

0:31:10.000 --> 0:31:13.200
<v Speaker 1>the Republican Party. It's easy for Democrats to call Trump names,

0:31:13.480 --> 0:31:16.160
<v Speaker 1>and they're right. I agree with them, but Republicans have

0:31:16.200 --> 0:31:18.520
<v Speaker 1>to commit career suicide to do it. But people did it.

0:31:19.000 --> 0:31:22.560
<v Speaker 1>Brad Raffensburger did it. The election officials in Michigan did it.

0:31:22.640 --> 0:31:24.440
<v Speaker 1>So do I believe the threat is there? And I'm

0:31:24.560 --> 0:31:28.520
<v Speaker 1>am I extremely worked up about it. Yes. Do I

0:31:28.560 --> 0:31:31.920
<v Speaker 1>think it's the trux of this election. No, but I

0:31:31.960 --> 0:31:33.760
<v Speaker 1>think measures are going to have to be taken. And

0:31:33.800 --> 0:31:35.800
<v Speaker 1>the one thing they may get done in the lame

0:31:35.880 --> 0:31:39.400
<v Speaker 1>Duck I would bet they will is the electoral account reformat,

0:31:39.480 --> 0:31:42.920
<v Speaker 1>which is a quiet technical piece of legislation that bolts

0:31:42.960 --> 0:31:46.320
<v Speaker 1>down the electoral college, which is vital. Now the left

0:31:46.320 --> 0:31:47.920
<v Speaker 1>will say, oh, the Supreme Court will do it, No,

0:31:48.000 --> 0:31:51.480
<v Speaker 1>they won't. It is it is the patch on the

0:31:51.560 --> 0:31:54.920
<v Speaker 1>software that has created a lot of this vulnerability, and

0:31:54.960 --> 0:31:57.080
<v Speaker 1>I think that's going to be gone by Christmas or

0:31:57.120 --> 0:31:59.440
<v Speaker 1>by the end of January. Liz, I want you to

0:31:59.480 --> 0:32:01.880
<v Speaker 1>weigh in on this because this is something I can't say.

0:32:01.880 --> 0:32:04.200
<v Speaker 1>It keeps me up at night, but I'm completely, very

0:32:04.280 --> 0:32:08.760
<v Speaker 1>very stressed out about uh sort of having the cards

0:32:08.800 --> 0:32:12.360
<v Speaker 1>stacked in a way in many of these states that

0:32:12.400 --> 0:32:17.840
<v Speaker 1>will basically disrupt democracy. Right. It's and it's you've got governors,

0:32:17.960 --> 0:32:22.480
<v Speaker 1>you've got secretaries of state, attorneys general, state legislators. I

0:32:22.480 --> 0:32:26.040
<v Speaker 1>think they're over two election deniers, you know, running crofts

0:32:26.080 --> 0:32:29.320
<v Speaker 1>across the country at every level. And so yeah, no,

0:32:29.480 --> 0:32:33.680
<v Speaker 1>we should be very concerned. But you know, I don't

0:32:33.720 --> 0:32:36.440
<v Speaker 1>have anything inspiring or or heartening to say on this.

0:32:36.600 --> 0:32:40.040
<v Speaker 1>It's that it does seem more remote to people. And

0:32:40.840 --> 0:32:44.040
<v Speaker 1>the thing that gets less focus is not necessarily the

0:32:44.480 --> 0:32:46.920
<v Speaker 1>Mastriano's a carry lakes, but all the people up and

0:32:46.960 --> 0:32:49.040
<v Speaker 1>down the ticket, right who are going to get elected

0:32:49.720 --> 0:32:53.960
<v Speaker 1>and who have actual power in this arena, right, Yeah, yeah,

0:32:54.000 --> 0:32:57.800
<v Speaker 1>for pulling the levers of elections and who have been

0:32:57.880 --> 0:32:59.840
<v Speaker 1>on a bash it by the way, and how they've

0:33:00.080 --> 0:33:02.040
<v Speaker 1>paint on this. They haven't like tried to hide the

0:33:02.040 --> 0:33:05.560
<v Speaker 1>ball here. They've been very open about the fact that um,

0:33:05.600 --> 0:33:09.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, they take was stolen and that if four

0:33:09.520 --> 0:33:12.360
<v Speaker 1>doesn't go their way that they'll make sure that they

0:33:12.520 --> 0:33:15.360
<v Speaker 1>or their secretaries stay what whoever it is, you know,

0:33:15.440 --> 0:33:17.160
<v Speaker 1>takes a close look at things. So I think it

0:33:17.440 --> 0:33:20.760
<v Speaker 1>is something we should be very concerned about because increasingly

0:33:20.840 --> 0:33:22.840
<v Speaker 1>it looks like the lunatics have been taking over this

0:33:22.880 --> 0:33:25.600
<v Speaker 1>asylum in the GOP and that not only that, is

0:33:25.600 --> 0:33:29.040
<v Speaker 1>that they are very um embracing and like Michigan was

0:33:29.080 --> 0:33:32.280
<v Speaker 1>on the early end of this, like in April when

0:33:32.320 --> 0:33:35.840
<v Speaker 1>we saw violent militias storm the capital there it almost

0:33:35.880 --> 0:33:39.280
<v Speaker 1>felt like a tester run for January six. And the

0:33:39.360 --> 0:33:41.800
<v Speaker 1>election to the nihilism does sort of seem to go

0:33:41.960 --> 0:33:44.800
<v Speaker 1>hand in hand with electoral violence, and I just think

0:33:44.800 --> 0:33:47.160
<v Speaker 1>that that's something, not that we need another thing to

0:33:47.320 --> 0:33:50.320
<v Speaker 1>be concerned about after this, sorry Katie, but another thing

0:33:50.360 --> 0:33:52.240
<v Speaker 1>that we should keep an eye on, and that's something

0:33:52.280 --> 0:33:55.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm certainly concerned about um going into the November election. Yeah,

0:33:55.960 --> 0:33:58.280
<v Speaker 1>i'd say one of the thing there is no moral

0:33:58.320 --> 0:34:05.720
<v Speaker 1>equivalence between far left AOC Bernie Democrats and and MAGA Republicans.

0:34:05.760 --> 0:34:09.120
<v Speaker 1>The far left people believe in democracy and the rule

0:34:09.160 --> 0:34:12.160
<v Speaker 1>of law, and they just hold policy views with which

0:34:12.719 --> 0:34:19.120
<v Speaker 1>moderate voters disagree. But the problem is Democrats have been

0:34:19.520 --> 0:34:23.760
<v Speaker 1>a little bit too defined by some of these extreme

0:34:23.840 --> 0:34:28.000
<v Speaker 1>voices to the point where in polling swing voters see

0:34:28.080 --> 0:34:33.040
<v Speaker 1>Democrats and Republicans as equally extreme. That is a big,

0:34:33.080 --> 0:34:37.200
<v Speaker 1>big issue, and Democrats need to turn around and address

0:34:37.239 --> 0:34:39.279
<v Speaker 1>it a s a p or it's going to be

0:34:39.320 --> 0:34:43.040
<v Speaker 1>the death of our party and all sorts of critical races. Yeah,

0:34:43.040 --> 0:34:45.400
<v Speaker 1>I agree with that one footnote, And this is not

0:34:45.520 --> 0:34:47.640
<v Speaker 1>a ray of hope or anything. It is kind of

0:34:47.680 --> 0:34:52.360
<v Speaker 1>like God forbid Mike a flickering, a flickering lightbulb with

0:34:52.440 --> 0:34:56.680
<v Speaker 1>some hope. A third of the election deniers are lying

0:34:56.719 --> 0:34:59.640
<v Speaker 1>through their teeth because they're trying to survive in Republican politics,

0:34:59.760 --> 0:35:02.680
<v Speaker 1>Sam t rhetoric. The worry is the other six fifty

0:35:02.760 --> 0:35:06.479
<v Speaker 1>to sixty that our stone cold nuts, and how many

0:35:06.480 --> 0:35:10.560
<v Speaker 1>of them actually win. And the craziest one I worry about,

0:35:10.560 --> 0:35:12.080
<v Speaker 1>because I think she has a good chance of winning,

0:35:12.200 --> 0:35:16.000
<v Speaker 1>is the potential future governor of Arizona. The rest of

0:35:16.000 --> 0:35:17.680
<v Speaker 1>the master and some of those are mostly gonna all

0:35:17.719 --> 0:35:20.520
<v Speaker 1>get killed off by the electorate, but we could have

0:35:20.600 --> 0:35:23.120
<v Speaker 1>a real crank or two as a governor, which is why,

0:35:23.160 --> 0:35:25.480
<v Speaker 1>again the electoral cadreformat, you've got to take some of

0:35:25.520 --> 0:35:28.040
<v Speaker 1>the power away. So if you have a rogue governor,

0:35:28.080 --> 0:35:32.040
<v Speaker 1>they can't start, you know, sending non elected electoral college

0:35:32.960 --> 0:35:37.440
<v Speaker 1>people to misrepresent the state's voters intention That is the

0:35:37.440 --> 0:35:40.480
<v Speaker 1>big loophole. Well, let's hope that happens before we dig

0:35:40.520 --> 0:35:43.120
<v Speaker 1>into a few of these states. So you know, we've

0:35:43.120 --> 0:35:45.960
<v Speaker 1>mentioned a lot of polls already in this conversation, and

0:35:46.040 --> 0:35:51.760
<v Speaker 1>polling was very problematic, um and obviously flawed in the past,

0:35:51.840 --> 0:35:54.080
<v Speaker 1>and it doesn't seem that a lot of changes have

0:35:54.719 --> 0:35:59.040
<v Speaker 1>been instituted to improve the accuracy of polling. So how

0:35:59.560 --> 0:36:01.879
<v Speaker 1>you know when when you look at the polling are

0:36:01.920 --> 0:36:06.000
<v Speaker 1>you are you do you believe it? Or are you

0:36:06.239 --> 0:36:13.280
<v Speaker 1>kind of thinking that might be under reporting certain certain groups?

0:36:13.360 --> 0:36:17.200
<v Speaker 1>You know, Trump supporters don't want to be is forthcoming

0:36:17.200 --> 0:36:22.280
<v Speaker 1>with polsters, so they sometimes overestimate democratic you know, turnout

0:36:22.400 --> 0:36:25.759
<v Speaker 1>or the effect of democratic turnout. So what what's your

0:36:25.800 --> 0:36:29.719
<v Speaker 1>take on polling these days? Yeah, I'm with you. With

0:36:29.800 --> 0:36:34.800
<v Speaker 1>every election cycle, I um have less and less faith

0:36:35.000 --> 0:36:38.799
<v Speaker 1>in public polling. And one thing that we've just seen

0:36:38.840 --> 0:36:41.520
<v Speaker 1>consistently the last few cycles, but is that it does

0:36:41.560 --> 0:36:47.040
<v Speaker 1>seem to undercount or underestimate the support for Republican candidates,

0:36:47.360 --> 0:36:50.680
<v Speaker 1>UM and for Trump supporters because they are, you know,

0:36:50.760 --> 0:36:55.080
<v Speaker 1>less trusting of polsters. So, you know, we saw a massive,

0:36:55.560 --> 0:36:59.080
<v Speaker 1>massive difference between the public polls and and and the

0:36:59.080 --> 0:37:03.480
<v Speaker 1>actual results in places like Ohio and Wisconsin, UM and

0:37:03.560 --> 0:37:06.359
<v Speaker 1>even in Michigan it was a little bit less of that.

0:37:06.440 --> 0:37:10.480
<v Speaker 1>But um and that makes me really concerned because in

0:37:10.600 --> 0:37:13.480
<v Speaker 1>Ohio and wisconsinent it looks like those Senate races are

0:37:13.520 --> 0:37:16.479
<v Speaker 1>going away from us, but the Michigan you still see

0:37:16.840 --> 0:37:19.880
<v Speaker 1>sort of healthy leads for Regretchen Whitmer there um and

0:37:20.000 --> 0:37:22.000
<v Speaker 1>some of the candidates there. But it does make me

0:37:22.120 --> 0:37:24.960
<v Speaker 1>concern that we are sort of missing the picture here.

0:37:25.239 --> 0:37:28.319
<v Speaker 1>Then add in with that, you have these completely out

0:37:28.400 --> 0:37:30.799
<v Speaker 1>of left field polls where you see the Democrat up

0:37:30.800 --> 0:37:34.400
<v Speaker 1>by one point in the gubernatorial race in Oklahoma, or

0:37:34.480 --> 0:37:37.920
<v Speaker 1>where you see leave zeld In within four points of

0:37:38.280 --> 0:37:41.680
<v Speaker 1>um Kathy Hokel in a poll today. And if you

0:37:41.719 --> 0:37:45.279
<v Speaker 1>put too much faith in polls, you might die of whiplash.

0:37:45.880 --> 0:37:47.800
<v Speaker 1>You know, we did an episode of Hacks on Tap

0:37:47.880 --> 0:37:51.000
<v Speaker 1>with a PhD Republican Polls to Is said, you know,

0:37:51.280 --> 0:37:54.880
<v Speaker 1>polling isn't what it used to be. The science of

0:37:54.920 --> 0:37:57.560
<v Speaker 1>it is very strong. You get a random sample of voters,

0:37:57.960 --> 0:38:01.239
<v Speaker 1>it's it's it's very telling. But two problems. One is

0:38:01.280 --> 0:38:03.160
<v Speaker 1>it's hard to get a random sampling more because nobody

0:38:03.160 --> 0:38:06.120
<v Speaker 1>answer their phone, so you have to do internet panels.

0:38:06.120 --> 0:38:08.839
<v Speaker 1>You have to text people there. It's called multimodel. It's

0:38:08.880 --> 0:38:11.600
<v Speaker 1>the best we've got now, but it's trickier. The other

0:38:11.640 --> 0:38:15.480
<v Speaker 1>problem is most people totally misunderstand polling. They use it

0:38:15.520 --> 0:38:18.839
<v Speaker 1>like a therapy animal. Oh my side's ahead, we're gonna win.

0:38:18.920 --> 0:38:21.359
<v Speaker 1>I feel good. Oh no, new Pole New York Times

0:38:21.360 --> 0:38:23.680
<v Speaker 1>says we're gonna lose. I feel bad. Must be something

0:38:23.719 --> 0:38:27.360
<v Speaker 1>wrong with that poll. The polls are terrible a projecting forward.

0:38:27.760 --> 0:38:30.400
<v Speaker 1>What political consultants use polls for is to take the

0:38:30.480 --> 0:38:32.920
<v Speaker 1>voter's head apart to figure out what new information we

0:38:32.960 --> 0:38:36.040
<v Speaker 1>can inject into the campaign dialogue, to try to get

0:38:36.040 --> 0:38:38.400
<v Speaker 1>a future outcome, to move our way. Who you're going

0:38:38.480 --> 0:38:40.160
<v Speaker 1>to vote for is the rear view mirror. You can

0:38:40.160 --> 0:38:41.919
<v Speaker 1>figure out who would have won an election that didn't

0:38:41.960 --> 0:38:45.480
<v Speaker 1>exist a week ago, and then that that stupid question.

0:38:45.520 --> 0:38:48.359
<v Speaker 1>The media loves of the generic ballot, which we will

0:38:48.400 --> 0:38:52.640
<v Speaker 1>vote for Congress nationally, so that's misleading. But again the

0:38:53.280 --> 0:38:56.279
<v Speaker 1>media business. Polling is the only time where the media

0:38:56.280 --> 0:38:58.840
<v Speaker 1>will create a story by buying a poll, often a crappy,

0:38:58.920 --> 0:39:02.960
<v Speaker 1>cheap one, and report that news. So people need to

0:39:03.000 --> 0:39:05.719
<v Speaker 1>like relax. I was gonna say it feels like the

0:39:05.800 --> 0:39:09.759
<v Speaker 1>media is being really irresponsible and tend it and its

0:39:09.880 --> 0:39:13.000
<v Speaker 1>reliance off these polls, Right, Brian, I would say there

0:39:13.000 --> 0:39:15.720
<v Speaker 1>are two additional problems, and I totally agree with you, Katie.

0:39:16.200 --> 0:39:21.600
<v Speaker 1>Um one is under accounting non college educated voters who

0:39:21.680 --> 0:39:26.080
<v Speaker 1>have become very skeptical about all sorts of institutions, including

0:39:26.080 --> 0:39:29.800
<v Speaker 1>the press, including posters, in part because they've been trained

0:39:29.800 --> 0:39:33.399
<v Speaker 1>by Trump to be that way. He's quite open about that.

0:39:34.280 --> 0:39:39.680
<v Speaker 1>But second, um more optimistically, from a democratic perspective, you

0:39:39.719 --> 0:39:43.040
<v Speaker 1>could see a different composition of the electorate. Mike and

0:39:43.120 --> 0:39:47.120
<v Speaker 1>Liz were alluding to this earlier because of Row, because

0:39:47.160 --> 0:39:50.080
<v Speaker 1>of other factors that make this election potentially a little

0:39:50.080 --> 0:39:53.560
<v Speaker 1>bit different than normal. You could see greater numbers of

0:39:53.640 --> 0:39:57.960
<v Speaker 1>young people, of Democrats, of African Americans than typically shows

0:39:58.080 --> 0:40:01.720
<v Speaker 1>up for a mid term election, and that could change

0:40:01.960 --> 0:40:05.680
<v Speaker 1>the modeling behind a lot of this polling. This polling

0:40:06.120 --> 0:40:09.840
<v Speaker 1>is often built on assumptions about likely voters. Yeah, you

0:40:09.880 --> 0:40:11.919
<v Speaker 1>never want to trust that. When they say this poll

0:40:12.000 --> 0:40:15.200
<v Speaker 1>is likely voters, it sounds better. It's actually much worse

0:40:15.400 --> 0:40:18.120
<v Speaker 1>because the poster has made arbitrary choices about who's going

0:40:18.160 --> 0:40:20.920
<v Speaker 1>to vote, and they don't really know. They don't know,

0:40:21.040 --> 0:40:23.560
<v Speaker 1>they don't know that. The hardest thing that they should

0:40:23.560 --> 0:40:25.279
<v Speaker 1>and the good ones work on, is get a true

0:40:25.360 --> 0:40:29.000
<v Speaker 1>random sample of based on history, the most likely electorate

0:40:29.400 --> 0:40:31.719
<v Speaker 1>and then they can ask some trick questions about what

0:40:31.840 --> 0:40:33.920
<v Speaker 1>data is the election or who are you going to

0:40:34.040 --> 0:40:36.680
<v Speaker 1>vote for? Without given names that they can name the candidate,

0:40:36.760 --> 0:40:39.560
<v Speaker 1>then you know they're engaged in So there's some some

0:40:39.640 --> 0:40:43.200
<v Speaker 1>trickery to it. But polling is still very helpful to

0:40:43.320 --> 0:40:45.640
<v Speaker 1>run a campaign. But if you want to look at

0:40:45.640 --> 0:40:47.719
<v Speaker 1>a poll today and decide who's gonna win all the

0:40:47.800 --> 0:40:52.640
<v Speaker 1>elections and decide whether you feel good or bad, it helps,

0:40:52.719 --> 0:40:55.200
<v Speaker 1>but it can't really do that for you. History is

0:40:55.239 --> 0:40:59.919
<v Speaker 1>the best guide of how people vote. After the break,

0:41:00.080 --> 0:41:03.480
<v Speaker 1>we're going to dig into some very juicy state races.

0:41:16.320 --> 0:41:18.839
<v Speaker 1>Let's talk to Georgia and Mike. You can also talk

0:41:18.840 --> 0:41:22.000
<v Speaker 1>about any state you're interested in, but let's talk about

0:41:22.000 --> 0:41:26.440
<v Speaker 1>Georgia because it is crazy. I mean a herschel Walker,

0:41:27.160 --> 0:41:31.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean Raphael Warnock. Go ahead, just have at it, guys.

0:41:31.560 --> 0:41:34.600
<v Speaker 1>Well you think this is crazy, wait till herschel Walker

0:41:34.640 --> 0:41:36.919
<v Speaker 1>wins and Trump starts talking about him as the leading

0:41:37.000 --> 0:41:40.960
<v Speaker 1>VP candidate. There will be lines outside psychiatrists office for

0:41:41.120 --> 0:41:44.040
<v Speaker 1>miles in the East and West coast. Um. You know,

0:41:44.080 --> 0:41:45.759
<v Speaker 1>Georgia is going to be a runoff. We get to

0:41:45.800 --> 0:41:47.960
<v Speaker 1>do this thing again. They have a Loft, you don't

0:41:47.960 --> 0:41:50.799
<v Speaker 1>get the fifty and there's a libertarian running, so it's

0:41:50.840 --> 0:41:55.040
<v Speaker 1>quite likely we have the whole Senate or one extra

0:41:55.120 --> 0:41:59.560
<v Speaker 1>vote decided in early December, not even on election day.

0:41:59.600 --> 0:42:03.920
<v Speaker 1>But Herschel's the classic boxing Hammers candidate. In a wave,

0:42:04.200 --> 0:42:08.239
<v Speaker 1>he can win. Uh, and so he's got I saw this.

0:42:08.920 --> 0:42:12.520
<v Speaker 1>You know with other candidates, when you're wildly credentialed in

0:42:12.640 --> 0:42:15.959
<v Speaker 1>something outside politics and people are in a wrong track

0:42:16.000 --> 0:42:18.800
<v Speaker 1>collection and hate politics, they give you a lot of leeway.

0:42:19.040 --> 0:42:21.920
<v Speaker 1>You mean, the fact that he's an honorary police officer,

0:42:22.000 --> 0:42:24.680
<v Speaker 1>is that what you're leading to. I'll tell you. I'll

0:42:24.680 --> 0:42:28.520
<v Speaker 1>tell you. Everybody's laughing about the toy badge, But if

0:42:28.560 --> 0:42:31.040
<v Speaker 1>you deconstruct that to that election and that electorate, and

0:42:31.040 --> 0:42:34.800
<v Speaker 1>I've worked statewide in Georgia, that bad said I like cops,

0:42:35.760 --> 0:42:38.799
<v Speaker 1>and that's not bad for Georgia cannidate to have be

0:42:39.080 --> 0:42:42.040
<v Speaker 1>the worst moment. That debate was not Walkers. Walker did better.

0:42:42.600 --> 0:42:45.320
<v Speaker 1>You know, he was mediocre, but Warnock was so bad.

0:42:45.840 --> 0:42:48.400
<v Speaker 1>When Warnock can't answer if he's for Joe Biden or not,

0:42:48.560 --> 0:42:50.520
<v Speaker 1>come on, we all know he's for Joe Biden. It's

0:42:50.560 --> 0:42:53.520
<v Speaker 1>okay to say it, but he won't answer. He becomes

0:42:53.520 --> 0:42:58.399
<v Speaker 1>a politician and Walker's the simple guy sat Biden groceries. Yes,

0:42:59.080 --> 0:43:01.399
<v Speaker 1>Walker had a better or debate, the deserved and we're

0:43:01.440 --> 0:43:03.960
<v Speaker 1>not getting awful debate. It was a draw and it

0:43:04.000 --> 0:43:06.120
<v Speaker 1>should have been a wipeout. And I can even argue

0:43:06.480 --> 0:43:08.120
<v Speaker 1>net Net. I think herschel is going to be a

0:43:08.160 --> 0:43:10.239
<v Speaker 1>little higher in the polling this week because I think

0:43:10.239 --> 0:43:14.120
<v Speaker 1>he came out of it better than even Yeah, and

0:43:14.200 --> 0:43:18.560
<v Speaker 1>he partially benefited from the expectations being set so low.

0:43:18.960 --> 0:43:21.000
<v Speaker 1>He did a good job of setting them low, but

0:43:21.120 --> 0:43:23.680
<v Speaker 1>Democrats did a good job of doing it for him,

0:43:23.840 --> 0:43:26.279
<v Speaker 1>and I think that was a mistake going into this.

0:43:26.360 --> 0:43:29.080
<v Speaker 1>And I think all along to some extent that Democrats

0:43:29.120 --> 0:43:34.880
<v Speaker 1>have underestimated uh Herschel Walker's appeal. But what about the

0:43:34.960 --> 0:43:40.080
<v Speaker 1>hypocrisy of being anti abortion and and you know, saying

0:43:40.120 --> 0:43:42.960
<v Speaker 1>that was his check Do people just not care? I

0:43:43.000 --> 0:43:45.760
<v Speaker 1>think people care about where you stand on an issue.

0:43:45.800 --> 0:43:48.960
<v Speaker 1>I think less and less over time people care about hypocrisy.

0:43:49.120 --> 0:43:52.680
<v Speaker 1>So for if you're a Republican voter, you care about

0:43:53.160 --> 0:43:55.359
<v Speaker 1>keeping the Senate. What you care about is the fact

0:43:55.400 --> 0:43:57.759
<v Speaker 1>that Herschel Walker is saying the right things to you

0:43:57.840 --> 0:44:00.320
<v Speaker 1>now on abortion. Whatever he didn't his path us, I

0:44:00.320 --> 0:44:02.400
<v Speaker 1>don't think it matters that much to him. I know

0:44:02.440 --> 0:44:05.080
<v Speaker 1>people are saying it could help around the margins with

0:44:05.800 --> 0:44:09.400
<v Speaker 1>UM swing voters, and and maybe that's possible, but I

0:44:09.440 --> 0:44:11.920
<v Speaker 1>think it's an election like where so many people already

0:44:11.920 --> 0:44:13.759
<v Speaker 1>have their minds made up that it's not going to

0:44:13.920 --> 0:44:17.280
<v Speaker 1>change a lot of minds on herschel Walker and others

0:44:17.800 --> 0:44:20.120
<v Speaker 1>for you to disagree. But I think the other interesting

0:44:20.160 --> 0:44:23.520
<v Speaker 1>thing that I'm looking at in Georgia is do split

0:44:23.640 --> 0:44:28.359
<v Speaker 1>ticket voters still exist? Because we're seeing very different polling

0:44:28.360 --> 0:44:31.040
<v Speaker 1>embers in the gubnatorial race from what we're seeing in

0:44:31.040 --> 0:44:34.480
<v Speaker 1>the Senate race where Brian Camp has a very healthy

0:44:34.640 --> 0:44:38.600
<v Speaker 1>lead over Stacy Abrams. And in recent years we've really

0:44:38.640 --> 0:44:42.160
<v Speaker 1>seen drop off in split ticket voters. So we fascinating

0:44:42.200 --> 0:44:45.520
<v Speaker 1>to see if how many people in Georgia are willing

0:44:45.960 --> 0:44:50.040
<v Speaker 1>to cast a ballot, you know, for Camp, but then

0:44:50.080 --> 0:44:53.680
<v Speaker 1>also for war Knock. My guess is not as many

0:44:53.719 --> 0:44:55.920
<v Speaker 1>as we're seeing in the polling right now, But that

0:44:56.080 --> 0:44:58.320
<v Speaker 1>is something that I think matters a lot for the

0:44:58.560 --> 0:45:02.400
<v Speaker 1>future of partisan politics in the country. Yeah, that's interesting

0:45:02.440 --> 0:45:05.240
<v Speaker 1>because I've been reading Brian a lot about people voting

0:45:05.280 --> 0:45:09.840
<v Speaker 1>for Josh Shapiro in Pennsylvania and then memot Oz for

0:45:10.040 --> 0:45:13.080
<v Speaker 1>Senate when you're talking about like the memot Oz is

0:45:13.120 --> 0:45:15.560
<v Speaker 1>gaining ground and I want to talk about that race

0:45:15.600 --> 0:45:18.440
<v Speaker 1>now because that to me is so fascinating on so

0:45:18.520 --> 0:45:24.080
<v Speaker 1>many different levels. Um, what do you think Georgia Pennsylvania

0:45:24.320 --> 0:45:28.239
<v Speaker 1>to break up your Yeah, that's okay, I'm used to it. Yeah,

0:45:28.640 --> 0:45:33.759
<v Speaker 1>we worked together a long time, So go ahead. I

0:45:33.800 --> 0:45:36.719
<v Speaker 1>would say, I think Warnock has got a hope that

0:45:36.800 --> 0:45:40.799
<v Speaker 1>he hits fifty in November because I think December, and

0:45:40.840 --> 0:45:43.319
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure if Mike and Liz agree, is very

0:45:43.400 --> 0:45:48.239
<v Speaker 1>dangerous for him because in December it becomes potentially a

0:45:48.239 --> 0:45:51.160
<v Speaker 1>fight over who controls the Senate. And I think a

0:45:51.200 --> 0:45:54.440
<v Speaker 1>lot of voters could hold their noses and vote for

0:45:54.520 --> 0:45:59.440
<v Speaker 1>Walker because in a generic ballot kind of election, they

0:45:59.440 --> 0:46:03.360
<v Speaker 1>would perfor a Republican control over Democratic control in Georgia. Also,

0:46:03.480 --> 0:46:05.879
<v Speaker 1>lower turnout in the arms will spell blood and they

0:46:05.920 --> 0:46:09.880
<v Speaker 1>turn out m all right, Well, let's move to Pennsylvania,

0:46:09.960 --> 0:46:12.920
<v Speaker 1>because a lot of people are saying in Pennsylvania to

0:46:13.000 --> 0:46:15.319
<v Speaker 1>your point, Liz about Georgia, it also might be a

0:46:15.320 --> 0:46:18.719
<v Speaker 1>split ticket with people voting for Josh Shapiro and Memotaz.

0:46:19.040 --> 0:46:22.359
<v Speaker 1>Let's talk about that race. John Fetterman, I've been fascinated

0:46:22.400 --> 0:46:26.239
<v Speaker 1>by this by the NBC political correspondent saying that he

0:46:26.280 --> 0:46:29.840
<v Speaker 1>didn't understand sort of the small talk and he uses

0:46:30.000 --> 0:46:33.960
<v Speaker 1>I guess a teleprompter to help with some of the

0:46:33.960 --> 0:46:38.239
<v Speaker 1>auditory issues caused by his stroke. Um. That has been

0:46:38.239 --> 0:46:42.000
<v Speaker 1>a fascinating race. Also, I know Memotas and talking about

0:46:42.120 --> 0:46:45.359
<v Speaker 1>crude detaise at the grocery store, which is almost like

0:46:45.560 --> 0:46:49.879
<v Speaker 1>Obama talking about a rugala, right, and um, so what's

0:46:49.920 --> 0:46:52.520
<v Speaker 1>happening there? How do you see this all shaking out?

0:46:52.600 --> 0:46:55.279
<v Speaker 1>Who wants to take that? Well? You know what's fascinating

0:46:55.480 --> 0:46:58.480
<v Speaker 1>is today I saw a brand new ad that Oz

0:46:58.520 --> 0:47:02.360
<v Speaker 1>put up um in which he says, or the voice

0:47:02.360 --> 0:47:06.719
<v Speaker 1>over says, John Vetterman is not like Josh Shapiro. He

0:47:06.840 --> 0:47:10.600
<v Speaker 1>is extreme on crime. So Oz is making an explicit

0:47:11.200 --> 0:47:15.200
<v Speaker 1>play for Shapiro voters and basically throwing mass Triano under

0:47:15.239 --> 0:47:18.360
<v Speaker 1>the bus by pumping up Shapiro as being good and

0:47:18.440 --> 0:47:23.760
<v Speaker 1>reasonable on criminal justice matters and crime. So Oz really

0:47:23.760 --> 0:47:26.200
<v Speaker 1>sees sort of his fate as tied to getting some

0:47:26.280 --> 0:47:31.040
<v Speaker 1>of those split ticket voters like suburban women, Liz, Yeah, exactly,

0:47:31.239 --> 0:47:35.600
<v Speaker 1>like people who might have concerns about Vetterman being too

0:47:35.640 --> 0:47:39.279
<v Speaker 1>progressive on criminal justice issues, and so it was talking

0:47:39.280 --> 0:47:42.560
<v Speaker 1>about his votes on the parole board. But there also

0:47:42.800 --> 0:47:45.840
<v Speaker 1>is this factor about Vetterman's health, and I think some

0:47:45.960 --> 0:47:48.960
<v Speaker 1>of it, some of the criticisms are fair, some are unfair,

0:47:49.000 --> 0:47:52.720
<v Speaker 1>but again, we can't tell voters what they care about.

0:47:53.280 --> 0:47:56.640
<v Speaker 1>And the debate that's coming up is gonna be really, really,

0:47:56.680 --> 0:48:00.320
<v Speaker 1>really important, um and more important than your average debate

0:48:00.400 --> 0:48:02.680
<v Speaker 1>because the voters are going to be looking to see

0:48:03.080 --> 0:48:05.920
<v Speaker 1>Ken John Fetterman perform in a way that gives me

0:48:05.960 --> 0:48:09.600
<v Speaker 1>the confidence in his ability to perform for me as

0:48:09.640 --> 0:48:12.319
<v Speaker 1>a U S. Senator. And that's why I don't think

0:48:12.360 --> 0:48:15.279
<v Speaker 1>that the their decision to do the NBC interview was

0:48:16.000 --> 0:48:18.600
<v Speaker 1>that much of a disaster. You know, I know feelings

0:48:18.600 --> 0:48:21.440
<v Speaker 1>are split on it, but it could also be a

0:48:21.520 --> 0:48:25.920
<v Speaker 1>dynamic like we saw in Georgia where Republicans Walker Democrats

0:48:26.239 --> 0:48:29.480
<v Speaker 1>lowered the expectations so much for Walker that you know,

0:48:29.560 --> 0:48:32.280
<v Speaker 1>if you could just speak in complete sentences, it's basically

0:48:32.360 --> 0:48:34.640
<v Speaker 1>a win. And we might see that dynamic for a

0:48:34.640 --> 0:48:37.320
<v Speaker 1>Fetterman in the upcoming. Yeah, sort of like Sarah Palent.

0:48:37.400 --> 0:48:39.799
<v Speaker 1>Sarah Palment did well in that debate because she was

0:48:39.840 --> 0:48:44.080
<v Speaker 1>so underestimated and can I call you Joe? And she

0:48:44.239 --> 0:48:46.680
<v Speaker 1>was stim in the trees, but she was able to

0:48:46.800 --> 0:48:48.839
<v Speaker 1>do you know, as long as her head didn't spin

0:48:48.880 --> 0:48:51.640
<v Speaker 1>around and she didn't vomit. You know that people thought

0:48:51.680 --> 0:48:55.800
<v Speaker 1>she was pretty good exactly. You know, ads though Fetterman

0:48:55.960 --> 0:48:59.200
<v Speaker 1>is getting killed by what we call the second look

0:48:59.239 --> 0:49:02.279
<v Speaker 1>in politic. He had some rocket fuell, he kept going

0:49:02.360 --> 0:49:04.960
<v Speaker 1>and people take the final look. This stroke has been

0:49:05.000 --> 0:49:07.480
<v Speaker 1>a problem. Now. I think the Federman campaign could have

0:49:07.480 --> 0:49:10.360
<v Speaker 1>done a better job of making him rocky in the

0:49:10.400 --> 0:49:12.960
<v Speaker 1>whole state rooting for him on the stroke instead of

0:49:13.000 --> 0:49:15.880
<v Speaker 1>being guarded about it. They've they've kind of changed that up.

0:49:15.920 --> 0:49:18.640
<v Speaker 1>They've been in a DRD campaign otherwise. And the other

0:49:18.640 --> 0:49:20.520
<v Speaker 1>problem is the crime record. You know, there are two

0:49:20.600 --> 0:49:23.879
<v Speaker 1>kinds of democratic crime records. They're kind of moderate ones

0:49:23.920 --> 0:49:26.719
<v Speaker 1>that are probably just gonna manufacture some trouble about and

0:49:26.760 --> 0:49:29.800
<v Speaker 1>there's pretty hardcore stuff where they actually mean the liberal

0:49:29.800 --> 0:49:32.200
<v Speaker 1>point of view and crime and voters aren't there and

0:49:32.239 --> 0:49:34.480
<v Speaker 1>the Republicans kill him with it. That's what happened in

0:49:34.480 --> 0:49:38.160
<v Speaker 1>Wisconsin with Mandela Barnes, and it's happening now to Fetterman.

0:49:38.239 --> 0:49:40.880
<v Speaker 1>So you're gonna have a debate where the question that

0:49:40.920 --> 0:49:44.560
<v Speaker 1>I think Federman can navigate with low expectations is the

0:49:44.600 --> 0:49:47.560
<v Speaker 1>stroke issue. But Oz made a living on TV and

0:49:47.600 --> 0:49:51.560
<v Speaker 1>he's really he's caught something on this crime stuff. It's real,

0:49:52.400 --> 0:49:56.239
<v Speaker 1>and you know it. Democrats get uncomfortable. All those Republicans again,

0:49:56.239 --> 0:49:59.200
<v Speaker 1>well they they scored here because there's real stuff. He's

0:49:59.200 --> 0:50:01.760
<v Speaker 1>got felons working on his campaign because he's a very

0:50:01.800 --> 0:50:04.040
<v Speaker 1>progressive guy on that. You know, you can argue the policy,

0:50:04.120 --> 0:50:06.880
<v Speaker 1>maybe he's right, but the voters of Pennsylvania in the

0:50:06.960 --> 0:50:11.200
<v Speaker 1>suburbs and other areas excurbs aren't there, and harden the

0:50:11.280 --> 0:50:14.760
<v Speaker 1>campaign to tell people they're wrong. This is another argument

0:50:14.800 --> 0:50:20.960
<v Speaker 1>for vigorously contested primaries in Pennsylvania and in Wisconsin. Fetterman

0:50:21.000 --> 0:50:24.440
<v Speaker 1>and Barnes didn't really have a back and forth with

0:50:24.480 --> 0:50:30.239
<v Speaker 1>their opponents about their vulnerabilities. Those were both positive elections

0:50:30.320 --> 0:50:34.320
<v Speaker 1>and campaigns, and it would have served Democratic voters better

0:50:34.880 --> 0:50:37.799
<v Speaker 1>if this stuff could have been litigated earlier, if we

0:50:38.080 --> 0:50:40.800
<v Speaker 1>could have seen how Barnes and Fetterman would have held

0:50:40.920 --> 0:50:45.239
<v Speaker 1>up on those issues, you know, six months ago rather

0:50:45.280 --> 0:50:49.000
<v Speaker 1>than a couple of weeks before the election. The Wisconsin candidate.

0:50:50.040 --> 0:50:52.560
<v Speaker 1>I think either of them would have been much stronger.

0:50:53.320 --> 0:50:56.480
<v Speaker 1>Barnes was. That was madness in their primary to do

0:50:56.520 --> 0:51:00.279
<v Speaker 1>what they did politically. What's also madness is that Rman

0:51:00.640 --> 0:51:03.719
<v Speaker 1>and Barnes's campaigns didn't see these attacks coming from a

0:51:03.800 --> 0:51:08.080
<v Speaker 1>mile away. UM smart candidates like Tim Ryan in Ohio,

0:51:08.520 --> 0:51:10.839
<v Speaker 1>where even if you look at Cheryl Beasley in North

0:51:10.840 --> 0:51:16.120
<v Speaker 1>Carolina or Val Demming's in Florida, they knew that Republicans

0:51:16.200 --> 0:51:18.920
<v Speaker 1>were gonna come back with the defund the police playbook,

0:51:19.239 --> 0:51:22.120
<v Speaker 1>and they made sure over the summer to run ads

0:51:22.320 --> 0:51:26.440
<v Speaker 1>featuring UM sheriffs or you know, cops whatever, directed camera

0:51:26.800 --> 0:51:30.200
<v Speaker 1>talking about how each of these candidates would be tough

0:51:30.239 --> 0:51:34.040
<v Speaker 1>on crime and UM. Neither Fetterman nor Barnes did that

0:51:34.160 --> 0:51:39.200
<v Speaker 1>even when they arguably had or inarguably had the worst

0:51:39.480 --> 0:51:42.000
<v Speaker 1>negatives on these issues. And the fact that they didn't

0:51:42.040 --> 0:51:45.479
<v Speaker 1>prepare for that is malpractice. Well, let's since you bring

0:51:45.480 --> 0:51:49.600
<v Speaker 1>them up. Easiley and Demeans. Are they both gonna lose?

0:51:50.719 --> 0:51:54.320
<v Speaker 1>Probably they're both in striking distance. But this year I

0:51:54.320 --> 0:51:57.279
<v Speaker 1>would bet against both of them easily. I think has

0:51:57.320 --> 0:52:00.520
<v Speaker 1>a slightly better shot based on data I've seen, including

0:52:00.520 --> 0:52:03.840
<v Speaker 1>public polls and demings in Florida. I think Florida is

0:52:03.880 --> 0:52:08.640
<v Speaker 1>going to be very, very tough. North Carolina these days, interestingly,

0:52:08.800 --> 0:52:12.800
<v Speaker 1>is a little bit tighter. But I think given where

0:52:12.840 --> 0:52:15.839
<v Speaker 1>this is headed, I I don't disagree with Mike, so

0:52:15.920 --> 0:52:18.399
<v Speaker 1>can I plug one last race for a quake. I'm

0:52:18.440 --> 0:52:21.040
<v Speaker 1>doing the superpack on this one because he's a friend

0:52:21.040 --> 0:52:22.960
<v Speaker 1>of mine and it's an amazing race, which is the

0:52:23.080 --> 0:52:28.120
<v Speaker 1>Utah Senate race. You have Evan McMullen, Republican hill staffer,

0:52:28.280 --> 0:52:32.759
<v Speaker 1>former CIA Clandestine Services agent, running as an independent, with

0:52:32.800 --> 0:52:37.799
<v Speaker 1>this amazing kind of republic crat coalition of independence Democrats,

0:52:37.800 --> 0:52:41.480
<v Speaker 1>and a significant amount of Republicans running against Republican incumbent

0:52:41.520 --> 0:52:43.279
<v Speaker 1>Mike Lee, who had been in trouble. He had a

0:52:43.320 --> 0:52:46.920
<v Speaker 1>primary thirty nine percent of the state Republicans voted against him.

0:52:46.920 --> 0:52:49.680
<v Speaker 1>This thing is neck and neck. It's not being noticed,

0:52:49.800 --> 0:52:52.960
<v Speaker 1>McMullan says, and he means it. I will not caucus

0:52:52.960 --> 0:52:56.640
<v Speaker 1>with Schumer or McConnell. I will be truly independent in

0:52:56.680 --> 0:52:59.360
<v Speaker 1>the Senate, and of course, the Club for Growth and

0:52:59.440 --> 0:53:01.680
<v Speaker 1>all the super pacts on the hard our side are

0:53:01.719 --> 0:53:04.440
<v Speaker 1>going after him, but he's gone from seventeen behind you

0:53:04.560 --> 0:53:06.840
<v Speaker 1>with margin of air race. It's really kind of amazing

0:53:07.480 --> 0:53:09.919
<v Speaker 1>and it's a real Mr Smith thing, and we'll see

0:53:09.960 --> 0:53:13.000
<v Speaker 1>if it can survive the hatchets flying through the air

0:53:13.080 --> 0:53:16.319
<v Speaker 1>right now. But um, it's the only time I've seen

0:53:16.360 --> 0:53:19.920
<v Speaker 1>a genuine hybrid candidacy with a lot of support from

0:53:20.000 --> 0:53:22.920
<v Speaker 1>all three parties, not just two and a label. And

0:53:23.000 --> 0:53:25.319
<v Speaker 1>we'll see what happens. It's going to be fascinating. Yeah,

0:53:25.400 --> 0:53:27.480
<v Speaker 1>we'll keep an eye on that. Well. Donors need to

0:53:27.480 --> 0:53:30.280
<v Speaker 1>pay more attention to races in the Pacific and Mountain

0:53:30.360 --> 0:53:32.840
<v Speaker 1>time zones. Um, they have a little bit of the

0:53:32.840 --> 0:53:35.520
<v Speaker 1>same problem that the New York d C Press does

0:53:35.680 --> 0:53:40.000
<v Speaker 1>in covering races across the whole country that is critical

0:53:40.400 --> 0:53:44.439
<v Speaker 1>to holding the Senate. Utah is a really fascinating race

0:53:44.520 --> 0:53:47.839
<v Speaker 1>for the pro democracy cause, and so I think these

0:53:47.880 --> 0:53:50.879
<v Speaker 1>things are really worth focusing on. And you were saying

0:53:50.880 --> 0:53:56.360
<v Speaker 1>Nevada earlier that the Democratic incumbent senator is likely to

0:53:56.480 --> 0:53:59.600
<v Speaker 1>lose to Paul lack salts On right. I think it's

0:53:59.719 --> 0:54:03.440
<v Speaker 1>very very close. Um, I'm not quite willing to go

0:54:03.680 --> 0:54:06.000
<v Speaker 1>as far as Mike can say that she's likely to lose.

0:54:06.080 --> 0:54:09.120
<v Speaker 1>I I think she could lose. I think, you know,

0:54:09.239 --> 0:54:14.480
<v Speaker 1>if the election were today, she might um. Nevada Democrats

0:54:14.520 --> 0:54:17.200
<v Speaker 1>have a history of pulling out these tough races over

0:54:17.239 --> 0:54:20.000
<v Speaker 1>the last ten years. We'll see if they can do

0:54:20.120 --> 0:54:23.399
<v Speaker 1>it this time. But part of the problem has been

0:54:24.040 --> 0:54:31.799
<v Speaker 1>extraordinary democratic deterioration among Latino voters who are not Latinos

0:54:31.840 --> 0:54:35.600
<v Speaker 1>in Florida are very different than Latinos in Arizona, and

0:54:35.640 --> 0:54:39.600
<v Speaker 1>even within these states, you know, Dominicans are different than Nicaraguans.

0:54:39.680 --> 0:54:42.120
<v Speaker 1>And I mean these are all individual voters, but I

0:54:42.160 --> 0:54:46.120
<v Speaker 1>think we can make some generalizations about a group that

0:54:47.160 --> 0:54:50.319
<v Speaker 1>Democrats considered part of their base. Remember all the talk

0:54:50.360 --> 0:54:53.920
<v Speaker 1>about communities of color and black and brown voters, Well,

0:54:54.000 --> 0:54:59.600
<v Speaker 1>Latinos are not like black voters who vote for the

0:54:59.600 --> 0:55:06.160
<v Speaker 1>Democrat attic party, very very different, you know, history, political ideology,

0:55:06.239 --> 0:55:09.320
<v Speaker 1>and this could become a real crisis for the party.

0:55:09.640 --> 0:55:11.680
<v Speaker 1>And as much attention as it has gotten over the

0:55:11.760 --> 0:55:14.600
<v Speaker 1>last few weeks, is it is not enough? Well, it

0:55:14.680 --> 0:55:18.000
<v Speaker 1>got a lot of attention in Florida in right, because

0:55:18.040 --> 0:55:22.000
<v Speaker 1>they were very surprised how the Latino vote panned out.

0:55:22.040 --> 0:55:26.440
<v Speaker 1>In um, and so I think this is mental Texas

0:55:26.480 --> 0:55:31.320
<v Speaker 1>to ye, I mean the Damns always go to identity

0:55:31.320 --> 0:55:33.439
<v Speaker 1>with the Latino vote, whre the Republicans go of lunch

0:55:33.480 --> 0:55:37.680
<v Speaker 1>pale stuff, and was fastening about Nevada, that hugely powerful

0:55:37.760 --> 0:55:42.319
<v Speaker 1>Latino vote. There is also heavily unionized culinary workers in

0:55:42.360 --> 0:55:47.719
<v Speaker 1>Clark County, and that's helps the Democrats. Doesn't Harry the

0:55:47.760 --> 0:55:50.759
<v Speaker 1>old Harry Reid machine. But Harry's gone now and the

0:55:50.840 --> 0:55:53.000
<v Speaker 1>machine right now is not doing what it normally does.

0:55:53.080 --> 0:55:55.600
<v Speaker 1>It's one reason why I bet on Laxalt. But we're

0:55:55.640 --> 0:55:58.319
<v Speaker 1>seeing because there's some cross pressure there. We'll see if

0:55:58.320 --> 0:56:01.360
<v Speaker 1>the trend continues. I have to ask you about Arizona

0:56:01.400 --> 0:56:04.200
<v Speaker 1>real quickly. Blake Masters and Mark Kelly. I'm friendly with

0:56:04.239 --> 0:56:07.880
<v Speaker 1>Mark Kelly because I did a documentary about gun gun

0:56:08.000 --> 0:56:11.880
<v Speaker 1>violence and got to know Mark and Gabby pretty well.

0:56:12.040 --> 0:56:15.680
<v Speaker 1>And Blake Masters has kind of changed his website when

0:56:15.680 --> 0:56:20.000
<v Speaker 1>it came to his anti abortion policies. And is Mark

0:56:20.040 --> 0:56:23.520
<v Speaker 1>gonna win? I think yeah, I think he is. He's

0:56:23.600 --> 0:56:27.480
<v Speaker 1>running another really, really good campaign where he has separated

0:56:27.600 --> 0:56:30.719
<v Speaker 1>his brand a lot from the national one, and he's

0:56:30.760 --> 0:56:33.200
<v Speaker 1>sort of seen as his own person. He did a

0:56:33.280 --> 0:56:35.880
<v Speaker 1>really good job a couple of years ago separating himself

0:56:35.880 --> 0:56:39.160
<v Speaker 1>from Biden on the border. He's run ads. He's one

0:56:39.200 --> 0:56:41.240
<v Speaker 1>of those candidates who saw that to fund the police

0:56:41.239 --> 0:56:44.080
<v Speaker 1>ads coming from a while away, ran at about it.

0:56:44.120 --> 0:56:46.520
<v Speaker 1>I think how his mom was a police officer. But

0:56:46.640 --> 0:56:49.279
<v Speaker 1>has really gone out and run on the issues that

0:56:49.360 --> 0:56:53.200
<v Speaker 1>voters care about and making economic case, but also running

0:56:53.239 --> 0:56:55.719
<v Speaker 1>as Mark Kelly, not as a generic Democrat. And I

0:56:55.760 --> 0:56:58.279
<v Speaker 1>think that's been a really really smart tactic. And to

0:56:58.440 --> 0:57:01.920
<v Speaker 1>lose this point, he hasn't been rewhelmed by Republican money.

0:57:01.960 --> 0:57:05.799
<v Speaker 1>I think he's been an extraordinarily effective fundraiser. Masters has

0:57:05.800 --> 0:57:08.520
<v Speaker 1>had trouble kind of getting his act together, um, and

0:57:08.560 --> 0:57:11.880
<v Speaker 1>so the outside Republican groups are not coming in in

0:57:11.920 --> 0:57:13.960
<v Speaker 1>the same way. And part of that is some drama

0:57:14.000 --> 0:57:16.920
<v Speaker 1>between Peter Tiele and Donald Trump, which is an interesting

0:57:16.960 --> 0:57:19.560
<v Speaker 1>soap opera. But the net result is I think Kelly

0:57:19.720 --> 0:57:23.280
<v Speaker 1>is well positioned in that race. Yeah, Masters went out

0:57:23.280 --> 0:57:25.840
<v Speaker 1>and picked a fight in a feud with Mitch McConnell,

0:57:25.880 --> 0:57:28.120
<v Speaker 1>which would not be in my playbook for how to

0:57:28.560 --> 0:57:31.480
<v Speaker 1>get help in a Senate race this year. Yeah, that

0:57:31.520 --> 0:57:34.160
<v Speaker 1>was that. That was sort of weird and hard to understand.

0:57:34.200 --> 0:57:37.880
<v Speaker 1>What about Stacy Abrams and Brian Camp Um. I heard

0:57:37.920 --> 0:57:41.120
<v Speaker 1>you all say about the split ticket thing, and uh,

0:57:41.240 --> 0:57:44.880
<v Speaker 1>what happened to the Abrams campaign? Well, I get a

0:57:44.960 --> 0:57:47.480
<v Speaker 1>FOURK because I think she's done and it's an amazing

0:57:47.520 --> 0:57:50.280
<v Speaker 1>story because she was at the top of the Democratic

0:57:50.320 --> 0:57:53.320
<v Speaker 1>Party and made, in my view and not smart decision

0:57:53.360 --> 0:57:56.160
<v Speaker 1>to try for her comeback in an off year in

0:57:56.200 --> 0:57:59.200
<v Speaker 1>a state that can have a Republican wave. Now she's

0:57:59.200 --> 0:58:01.120
<v Speaker 1>going to get be and she's going to drop to

0:58:01.160 --> 0:58:03.600
<v Speaker 1>double a baseball in the Democratic Party when she could

0:58:03.600 --> 0:58:06.560
<v Speaker 1>have if Biden doesn't run again, she could have been

0:58:06.560 --> 0:58:10.440
<v Speaker 1>a contender. I think so, Uh, Camp is good, Paul,

0:58:10.560 --> 0:58:12.840
<v Speaker 1>He's significantly ahead and it's going to stay that way

0:58:13.040 --> 0:58:16.200
<v Speaker 1>in my view. What do you think happened, Brian? I

0:58:16.240 --> 0:58:19.360
<v Speaker 1>think a lot of it is structural, As Mike says,

0:58:19.800 --> 0:58:24.880
<v Speaker 1>if you're running in a purple uh slash reddish state

0:58:25.440 --> 0:58:29.960
<v Speaker 1>in an off year against a popular incumbent, it's going

0:58:30.000 --> 0:58:32.520
<v Speaker 1>to be very challenging, no matter how adroit you are

0:58:32.560 --> 0:58:35.480
<v Speaker 1>as a candidate. Um. And then I think you know,

0:58:35.560 --> 0:58:37.880
<v Speaker 1>she also made some mistakes over the last couple of

0:58:37.960 --> 0:58:41.640
<v Speaker 1>years marketing herself a little bit more for a national

0:58:41.680 --> 0:58:45.560
<v Speaker 1>Democratic audience and a little less for a Georgia Democratic audience.

0:58:45.680 --> 0:58:47.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I don't think this is gonna be enough

0:58:47.720 --> 0:58:51.240
<v Speaker 1>to save Betto in Texas. But I think since his

0:58:51.320 --> 0:58:56.040
<v Speaker 1>presidential campaign, Betto has been very focused on a Texas

0:58:56.040 --> 0:58:58.880
<v Speaker 1>specific message, and I think he took a little bit

0:58:58.920 --> 0:59:02.720
<v Speaker 1>longer for Abrams to make that switch. I want you,

0:59:02.840 --> 0:59:05.360
<v Speaker 1>I want to talk to you real quickly about Texas. Sorry,

0:59:05.440 --> 0:59:07.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm not going to keep you guys all all afternoon,

0:59:07.920 --> 0:59:12.520
<v Speaker 1>but Betto. I know Abvitt leads better or work for

0:59:12.560 --> 0:59:16.120
<v Speaker 1>the Texas subernatorial race by four points in the latest

0:59:16.160 --> 0:59:20.200
<v Speaker 1>pool that we can't believe. So is does Betto have

0:59:20.280 --> 0:59:23.000
<v Speaker 1>a chance to pull it off? You think? I don't

0:59:23.040 --> 0:59:26.400
<v Speaker 1>think so. I think that those last three to five

0:59:26.520 --> 0:59:30.320
<v Speaker 1>points in Texas are like climbing Mount Everest for a Democrat.

0:59:30.800 --> 0:59:35.320
<v Speaker 1>I think you know, Texas has been moving in a

0:59:35.360 --> 0:59:39.480
<v Speaker 1>more competitive direction for a while, but I don't think

0:59:39.520 --> 0:59:43.280
<v Speaker 1>it's going to happen this year. Stay with me, friends,

0:59:43.440 --> 0:59:58.600
<v Speaker 1>because right after this we're tackling and Donald Trump before

0:59:58.640 --> 1:00:03.520
<v Speaker 1>we go, Uh, you think that Trump is on the decline? Mike,

1:00:03.560 --> 1:00:06.360
<v Speaker 1>I heard you say that, who do you think will

1:00:06.440 --> 1:00:11.880
<v Speaker 1>run in is Fronto Santis, the rising star of the

1:00:11.960 --> 1:00:16.120
<v Speaker 1>Republican Party. Well, de Santis is showing is possible to

1:00:16.120 --> 1:00:19.760
<v Speaker 1>be a Trump alternative and survived the preseason if you're

1:00:19.760 --> 1:00:22.120
<v Speaker 1>a cultural warrior and you can't be attacked as a

1:00:22.200 --> 1:00:26.840
<v Speaker 1>squishy you know, moderate Reno Republican. So he's proving the

1:00:26.880 --> 1:00:29.479
<v Speaker 1>case that there can be competition to Trump. He's pulling.

1:00:29.600 --> 1:00:33.160
<v Speaker 1>Trump's getting about forty of vote in the primary right now.

1:00:33.520 --> 1:00:35.320
<v Speaker 1>This Santus is hanging in there in the mid to

1:00:35.400 --> 1:00:38.360
<v Speaker 1>high twenties in Florida where the Trump voters know both

1:00:38.360 --> 1:00:41.120
<v Speaker 1>of them to Santis beats Trump. So it's just it's

1:00:41.160 --> 1:00:43.200
<v Speaker 1>like a bad X ray. Oh, like, you know, you've

1:00:43.200 --> 1:00:46.120
<v Speaker 1>got some bad Organs here. Now, does that mean Trump

1:00:46.160 --> 1:00:49.760
<v Speaker 1>won't be the nominee. No, He's still formidable. But it's

1:00:49.760 --> 1:00:51.720
<v Speaker 1>an interesting trend and there are others who will try

1:00:51.760 --> 1:00:54.560
<v Speaker 1>to fill that void depending on how weak they think

1:00:54.560 --> 1:00:58.160
<v Speaker 1>Trump is in six months. So stay tuned. Well, you

1:00:58.200 --> 1:01:03.040
<v Speaker 1>know there's cruise of always try to run. Rubio always

1:01:03.080 --> 1:01:06.720
<v Speaker 1>wants to run. You've got Josh Holly who kind of

1:01:06.760 --> 1:01:09.440
<v Speaker 1>wants to be a new Trump. You've got Tom Cotton,

1:01:09.560 --> 1:01:12.760
<v Speaker 1>Senator from Margaret They're both Arkansas, who's a slightly smarter

1:01:12.920 --> 1:01:16.000
<v Speaker 1>version of Josh Holly. You've got Larry Hogan will be

1:01:16.040 --> 1:01:18.960
<v Speaker 1>the great hero of the sensible wing of the party.

1:01:19.280 --> 1:01:21.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm all form he'll get slaughtered. Well, I was gonna

1:01:21.880 --> 1:01:25.240
<v Speaker 1>say he's he's he's very different than the other other

1:01:25.320 --> 1:01:27.880
<v Speaker 1>people you mentioned. Yeah, he could upset New Hampshire and

1:01:27.920 --> 1:01:32.160
<v Speaker 1>then get crushed. Um. You know. Unfortunately, you've got Adam

1:01:32.240 --> 1:01:34.240
<v Speaker 1>Kinsinger I think may try to make a run at it.

1:01:34.320 --> 1:01:37.480
<v Speaker 1>Mary Cheney may run. Excuse me, Liz Janey. Mary's no

1:01:37.600 --> 1:01:40.919
<v Speaker 1>friend of mine, and so I always canfuse them. Uh,

1:01:41.000 --> 1:01:43.640
<v Speaker 1>Liz may run just to drive Trump crazy at debates,

1:01:44.240 --> 1:01:47.160
<v Speaker 1>but electorally, she won't have the votes in the primary.

1:01:47.240 --> 1:01:49.600
<v Speaker 1>You might see it Dan Crenshaw the House, or somebody

1:01:49.600 --> 1:01:52.560
<v Speaker 1>who's kind of unknown now but has some rocket fuel

1:01:52.840 --> 1:01:56.520
<v Speaker 1>in them if they were paid attention to. So if

1:01:56.520 --> 1:01:58.480
<v Speaker 1>Trump has seen this week, there will be no shortage.

1:01:58.480 --> 1:02:00.480
<v Speaker 1>On the other hand, there will be tremendous pressure unified

1:02:00.800 --> 1:02:03.880
<v Speaker 1>among one because in the plurality model like we had

1:02:03.880 --> 1:02:07.000
<v Speaker 1>in the sixteen Trump can keep going if Trump decides

1:02:07.040 --> 1:02:09.000
<v Speaker 1>to run, which he may not. And I would add

1:02:09.000 --> 1:02:12.560
<v Speaker 1>two others. NICKI Haley and Tim Scott um who would

1:02:12.560 --> 1:02:15.920
<v Speaker 1>be interesting because they're you know, they're not white guys

1:02:16.320 --> 1:02:20.120
<v Speaker 1>and very smart, very ambitious, etcetera. Um, I think, as

1:02:20.160 --> 1:02:24.640
<v Speaker 1>Mike just said, the challenge for the non Trump candidate is,

1:02:24.680 --> 1:02:28.600
<v Speaker 1>even if he deteriorates to thirty five or um in

1:02:28.680 --> 1:02:32.880
<v Speaker 1>the winner take all Republican primary world, that's how he

1:02:32.960 --> 1:02:35.880
<v Speaker 1>won in sixteen without getting majority support in the party.

1:02:36.120 --> 1:02:39.280
<v Speaker 1>That is easily how he could win again in twenty

1:02:39.320 --> 1:02:43.920
<v Speaker 1>four and so um, you would need a unified, consolidated opposition.

1:02:44.200 --> 1:02:47.200
<v Speaker 1>I agree, there's one wrinkle. I don't think Trump could

1:02:47.240 --> 1:02:50.600
<v Speaker 1>take a defeat early like he could back then. And

1:02:50.760 --> 1:02:52.520
<v Speaker 1>we'll see. But I think he's got more of a

1:02:52.520 --> 1:02:56.880
<v Speaker 1>glass john now. Because yes, we're publican primary voters and Republicans.

1:02:56.920 --> 1:02:59.920
<v Speaker 1>What do you think of Trump? Love? Should we nominate

1:03:00.040 --> 1:03:03.200
<v Speaker 1>him again? Half walk away? No time for somebody new.

1:03:03.280 --> 1:03:06.760
<v Speaker 1>That's the real purality in the party. So if if

1:03:06.800 --> 1:03:09.439
<v Speaker 1>Trump gets caught and actually bleeds, I think it could

1:03:09.480 --> 1:03:12.280
<v Speaker 1>fold inside itself pretty quickly. But a lot of ifs,

1:03:12.720 --> 1:03:15.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, we'll see, he might be running from you know,

1:03:16.480 --> 1:03:18.880
<v Speaker 1>being confined to a qualm set hut on an air

1:03:18.920 --> 1:03:21.720
<v Speaker 1>base somewhere serving out a sentence. So, you know, a

1:03:21.800 --> 1:03:24.919
<v Speaker 1>lot a lot of unknowns in the Republican world right now.

1:03:25.160 --> 1:03:27.880
<v Speaker 1>And if Joe Biden doesn't run, and I know the

1:03:28.520 --> 1:03:32.680
<v Speaker 1>conventional wisdom is he will right now, who will be

1:03:32.920 --> 1:03:37.080
<v Speaker 1>the Democratic nominee? I mean, Kamala doesn't seem to enjoy

1:03:37.240 --> 1:03:39.720
<v Speaker 1>much popularity and has kind of been in the witness

1:03:39.760 --> 1:03:43.680
<v Speaker 1>protection program in some ways. And I mean, so who

1:03:43.760 --> 1:03:47.560
<v Speaker 1>is this Who is the the person in the Democratic

1:03:47.600 --> 1:03:50.240
<v Speaker 1>Party who is going to rise to the occasion. I

1:03:50.280 --> 1:03:52.920
<v Speaker 1>don't know, but watch Whipner. I think that Joe Biden

1:03:53.040 --> 1:03:55.960
<v Speaker 1>is going to run. But if he doesn't run, just

1:03:56.760 --> 1:03:59.280
<v Speaker 1>I think it's really incumbent upon the party to have

1:03:59.360 --> 1:04:03.320
<v Speaker 1>a big, vibrant primary and not just try to hand

1:04:03.320 --> 1:04:05.920
<v Speaker 1>off the nomination of someone and look how at work

1:04:05.960 --> 1:04:08.360
<v Speaker 1>for us. I think we did end up with the

1:04:08.400 --> 1:04:11.600
<v Speaker 1>strongest candidate to run against Donald Trump and Joe Biden,

1:04:12.160 --> 1:04:14.360
<v Speaker 1>And going forward, I think we should try to aim

1:04:14.360 --> 1:04:17.560
<v Speaker 1>for that as a party and real quickly if the

1:04:17.600 --> 1:04:22.680
<v Speaker 1>House and Senate both go Republican, you know, are they

1:04:22.680 --> 1:04:25.920
<v Speaker 1>going to try to impeach Joe Biden? And for what

1:04:26.080 --> 1:04:29.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think the House guys will, well, they're

1:04:29.440 --> 1:04:31.800
<v Speaker 1>played to their internal politics and there will be noise

1:04:31.800 --> 1:04:36.520
<v Speaker 1>about Impeachingums. Ridiculous. What well, it's good for Biden. That's

1:04:36.520 --> 1:04:38.400
<v Speaker 1>the one thing I could unify the party around. What

1:04:38.480 --> 1:04:41.720
<v Speaker 1>are they and for being a Democrat? You know, all

1:04:41.760 --> 1:04:44.840
<v Speaker 1>the sanity. We're a reality show here. You know, why

1:04:44.880 --> 1:04:48.880
<v Speaker 1>did why did you know? Uh, Tawny throw the chair

1:04:48.960 --> 1:04:51.320
<v Speaker 1>at Belinda because she was mad she wasn't invited to

1:04:51.320 --> 1:04:53.600
<v Speaker 1>the cocktail party. I mean we've we've turned it into that,

1:04:53.680 --> 1:04:58.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, um and watch watch Real Housewives. No, I hate.

1:04:58.600 --> 1:05:00.920
<v Speaker 1>I want Andy Cohen to be brought up on charges

1:05:00.960 --> 1:05:05.320
<v Speaker 1>for cultural crimes for what that world has created. My wife,

1:05:05.360 --> 1:05:07.360
<v Speaker 1>of course watching it, and I hear coming down the hallway,

1:05:07.560 --> 1:05:10.600
<v Speaker 1>my daughters watch it, and I'm like, girls, you've got

1:05:10.760 --> 1:05:15.160
<v Speaker 1>really good education. Why are you watching this? Oh? Everybody

1:05:15.160 --> 1:05:18.520
<v Speaker 1>watches it. But Trump is a reality star, that's all

1:05:18.560 --> 1:05:21.200
<v Speaker 1>he is. I want to hear more about Tonny and Belinda.

1:05:21.320 --> 1:05:25.840
<v Speaker 1>I know. Meanwhile, the Chinese are graduating five thousand engineers

1:05:25.840 --> 1:05:27.840
<v Speaker 1>a year and we're screwing around with who through a

1:05:27.840 --> 1:05:30.560
<v Speaker 1>cupcake at who won the party bus? But so, so,

1:05:30.920 --> 1:05:34.720
<v Speaker 1>what are your predictions if the Republicans win when both Houses.

1:05:35.080 --> 1:05:38.760
<v Speaker 1>Everything shuts down except for executive orders. The Democratic Party

1:05:38.800 --> 1:05:41.880
<v Speaker 1>starts to eat poor Joe Biden for electoral failure. The

1:05:41.920 --> 1:05:44.680
<v Speaker 1>Republicans get very little done and overplay their hand and

1:05:44.720 --> 1:05:47.160
<v Speaker 1>make some mistakes, though the map for them in the

1:05:47.200 --> 1:05:50.560
<v Speaker 1>center is pretty damn good in and both parties have

1:05:50.560 --> 1:05:53.280
<v Speaker 1>a big, crazy open primary that will erupt all through

1:05:53.320 --> 1:05:58.880
<v Speaker 1>particularly the the second third quarter of and people on

1:05:58.960 --> 1:06:01.400
<v Speaker 1>the left will be looking up real estate in Portugal

1:06:01.480 --> 1:06:04.040
<v Speaker 1>and Australia. That's why the margin in the House is

1:06:04.080 --> 1:06:06.520
<v Speaker 1>so important. I think one of the fundamental mistakes of

1:06:06.560 --> 1:06:09.160
<v Speaker 1>this election is a lot of Democratic donors thought, oh,

1:06:09.240 --> 1:06:11.760
<v Speaker 1>the House is lost, so I'm not gonna send money.

1:06:12.080 --> 1:06:14.440
<v Speaker 1>You know what, Losing the House by five or ten

1:06:14.520 --> 1:06:18.600
<v Speaker 1>seats is recoverable in two years. Losing it by twenty

1:06:18.680 --> 1:06:21.480
<v Speaker 1>five or thirty much much more difficult. I agree. The

1:06:21.480 --> 1:06:25.400
<v Speaker 1>Republicans absolutely will overplay their hand because McCarthy is a

1:06:25.440 --> 1:06:28.520
<v Speaker 1>prisoner of the extremists in his own party. He's shown

1:06:28.600 --> 1:06:31.280
<v Speaker 1>no capacity to stand up to them, and he's cozy

1:06:31.360 --> 1:06:33.720
<v Speaker 1>enough to Marjorie Taylor Green, Oh to all of them.

1:06:34.080 --> 1:06:38.160
<v Speaker 1>He can't we got beat. You know, the brave tan

1:06:38.240 --> 1:06:40.560
<v Speaker 1>who voted for impeachment are all gone except for one.

1:06:41.320 --> 1:06:43.800
<v Speaker 1>So the Republican casually isn't there. You got the damn

1:06:43.840 --> 1:06:48.960
<v Speaker 1>d trip going in and murdering UH Michigan, Um Peter Meyer,

1:06:49.000 --> 1:06:51.960
<v Speaker 1>who is a complete patriot and hero because they're doing

1:06:51.960 --> 1:06:53.720
<v Speaker 1>anything to win a primary. Now they may get a

1:06:53.800 --> 1:06:57.680
<v Speaker 1>nut in that district. So anyway, it it's gonna be

1:06:57.720 --> 1:07:00.720
<v Speaker 1>grim in the Republican House conference. There's still saying people

1:07:00.720 --> 1:07:03.600
<v Speaker 1>on the Sentate side, and Liz will let you have

1:07:03.680 --> 1:07:07.200
<v Speaker 1>the last word. Um. Look, I agree with both what

1:07:07.400 --> 1:07:10.920
<v Speaker 1>Mike and Brian said, and if I were a Republican

1:07:11.200 --> 1:07:15.680
<v Speaker 1>I really would fear. Um the prospect of overreach and

1:07:15.720 --> 1:07:18.840
<v Speaker 1>the fact that they are already talking about impeached and

1:07:18.920 --> 1:07:22.360
<v Speaker 1>Joe Biden for nothing, frankly, other than being a Democrat

1:07:22.640 --> 1:07:25.800
<v Speaker 1>should be a real warning sign to them. So my

1:07:25.880 --> 1:07:27.880
<v Speaker 1>prediction is that it is going to be an ugly

1:07:28.040 --> 1:07:31.480
<v Speaker 1>couple of years, but um that there probably will be

1:07:31.520 --> 1:07:34.560
<v Speaker 1>some electoral backlash for them if they overplay their hands.

1:07:34.800 --> 1:07:40.160
<v Speaker 1>All right, I'm gonna go look for some tims. Always

1:07:40.200 --> 1:07:42.560
<v Speaker 1>great to talk to you all. Thank you so much

1:07:42.600 --> 1:07:45.080
<v Speaker 1>for being so generous with your time. Liz, Brian and

1:07:45.120 --> 1:07:52.240
<v Speaker 1>Mike and Uh let's stay in touch. Thanks. Thanks Yea.

1:07:57.400 --> 1:07:59.640
<v Speaker 1>Next Question with Katie Kurik is the production of My

1:07:59.760 --> 1:08:03.680
<v Speaker 1>Heart Media and Katie Curric Media. The executive producers Army,

1:08:03.880 --> 1:08:08.400
<v Speaker 1>Katie Curic, and Courtney Litz. The supervising producer is Lauren Hansen.

1:08:08.720 --> 1:08:13.320
<v Speaker 1>Associate producers Derek Clements and Adriana Fasio. The show is

1:08:13.440 --> 1:08:17.200
<v Speaker 1>edited and mixed by Derrick Clements. For more information about

1:08:17.240 --> 1:08:20.160
<v Speaker 1>today's episode, or to sign up for my morning newsletter,

1:08:20.200 --> 1:08:23.080
<v Speaker 1>Wake Up Paul, go to Katie Currek dot com. You

1:08:23.120 --> 1:08:25.760
<v Speaker 1>can also find me at Katie Currik on Instagram and

1:08:25.960 --> 1:08:29.320
<v Speaker 1>all my social media channels. For more podcasts from I

1:08:29.439 --> 1:08:33.280
<v Speaker 1>Heart Radio, visit the I Heart Radio app, Apple podcast,

1:08:33.640 --> 1:08:35.839
<v Speaker 1>or wherever you listen to your favorite shows,