WEBVTT - Solar and batteries are thriving — even in Trump’s America

0:00:00.120 --> 0:00:03.840
<v Speaker 1>The US renewables industry is dead, killed by a president

0:00:04.000 --> 0:00:07.800
<v Speaker 1>who hates wind turbines and loves supporting the fossil fuel industry.

0:00:08.480 --> 0:00:10.960
<v Speaker 1>That's the narrative we often hear coming out of the

0:00:11.080 --> 0:00:14.840
<v Speaker 1>US right now. But is it true? This is zero?

0:00:15.040 --> 0:00:18.639
<v Speaker 1>I am Akshadrati this week. What's really happening to the

0:00:18.680 --> 0:00:27.720
<v Speaker 1>renewables industry in the US. President Donald Trump's administration has

0:00:27.760 --> 0:00:30.600
<v Speaker 1>taken a big swipe at clean energy policies in the US,

0:00:30.960 --> 0:00:34.280
<v Speaker 1>gutting tax credits for wind and solar, removing subsidies for

0:00:34.320 --> 0:00:38.360
<v Speaker 1>electric cars, and even using taxpayer dollars to haul the

0:00:38.400 --> 0:00:42.479
<v Speaker 1>development of offshore wind farms. That has certainly heard the country's

0:00:42.520 --> 0:00:46.519
<v Speaker 1>clean energy credentials, But if you look at the deployment figures,

0:00:47.080 --> 0:00:51.480
<v Speaker 1>renewables are still winning. Ninety percent of all new power

0:00:51.479 --> 0:00:54.600
<v Speaker 1>generating capacity added to the grid last year was made

0:00:54.680 --> 0:00:58.080
<v Speaker 1>up of solar, wind, and batteries. The same thing is

0:00:58.120 --> 0:01:03.240
<v Speaker 1>expected to happen this year. So why the discrepancy between

0:01:03.280 --> 0:01:06.880
<v Speaker 1>the narrative and the deployment One place we can try

0:01:06.920 --> 0:01:09.679
<v Speaker 1>to find an answer is in the US state of Arkansas.

0:01:10.040 --> 0:01:12.720
<v Speaker 1>It is now home to the Steel River Energy Center,

0:01:13.120 --> 0:01:15.440
<v Speaker 1>which will become one of the largest solar and battery

0:01:15.440 --> 0:01:19.440
<v Speaker 1>storage projects anywhere in the US. When all three phases

0:01:19.480 --> 0:01:22.360
<v Speaker 1>are completed in twenty twenty nine, it will have two

0:01:22.400 --> 0:01:25.640
<v Speaker 1>point five gigawards of solar and two point nine gigaward

0:01:25.720 --> 0:01:29.959
<v Speaker 1>hours of battery storage. That plant alone will be enough

0:01:30.000 --> 0:01:33.520
<v Speaker 1>to power a small city. My guest today is playing

0:01:33.640 --> 0:01:37.360
<v Speaker 1>a leading role in that building Frenzy, having secured three

0:01:37.440 --> 0:01:41.280
<v Speaker 1>point five billion dollars in financing. His name is Kevin Smith,

0:01:41.319 --> 0:01:45.399
<v Speaker 1>and he's the chief executive officer of Cypress Creek Energy.

0:01:45.480 --> 0:01:47.920
<v Speaker 1>He spent the last two decades working in renewables in

0:01:47.960 --> 0:01:51.400
<v Speaker 1>the US and abroad, and he believes everything points to

0:01:51.440 --> 0:01:55.120
<v Speaker 1>a future powered by solar and batteries even in the US.

0:01:56.000 --> 0:01:58.840
<v Speaker 1>But given the barriers that the Trump administration has put up,

0:01:59.040 --> 0:02:02.800
<v Speaker 1>can that really happen? The government keeps raising tariffs in China,

0:02:03.440 --> 0:02:06.800
<v Speaker 1>does it have enough of its own manufacturing capacity for

0:02:06.920 --> 0:02:11.440
<v Speaker 1>clean energy? And do companies building artificial intelligence, the core

0:02:11.520 --> 0:02:15.359
<v Speaker 1>reason for rising electricity demand in the US, really care

0:02:15.520 --> 0:02:21.040
<v Speaker 1>if it comes from renewables. Welcome to the show, Kevin,

0:02:21.360 --> 0:02:22.079
<v Speaker 1>Thank you very much.

0:02:22.080 --> 0:02:22.960
<v Speaker 2>It's nice to be here.

0:02:23.360 --> 0:02:26.200
<v Speaker 1>So you've been in the energy industry for forty years,

0:02:26.360 --> 0:02:29.560
<v Speaker 1>two decades in oil and gas, and then the last

0:02:29.560 --> 0:02:32.760
<v Speaker 1>two decades in renewables, and you've seen many ups and

0:02:32.800 --> 0:02:37.440
<v Speaker 1>downs in both industries in the US specifically, right now,

0:02:38.440 --> 0:02:42.560
<v Speaker 1>the narrative is that the US renewables industry is under

0:02:42.600 --> 0:02:45.840
<v Speaker 1>attack from the Trump administration and the future for the

0:02:45.880 --> 0:02:49.000
<v Speaker 1>industry is dire than it has ever been before.

0:02:49.200 --> 0:02:52.080
<v Speaker 3>Is it true, Well, the first part is true, the

0:02:52.120 --> 0:02:56.079
<v Speaker 3>second part is not true. So certainly the industry has

0:02:56.120 --> 0:03:00.320
<v Speaker 3>been under attack by the administration. Frankly with them and

0:03:00.360 --> 0:03:05.320
<v Speaker 3>struggling to pay their electric bills. Doesn't make sense to

0:03:05.400 --> 0:03:09.720
<v Speaker 3>be attacking the most affordable energy cost out there with

0:03:10.120 --> 0:03:15.680
<v Speaker 3>solar and renewables generally, So, yes, the industry has been

0:03:15.960 --> 0:03:19.240
<v Speaker 3>has been under attack with policy changes and policy issues

0:03:19.280 --> 0:03:20.559
<v Speaker 3>with the administration.

0:03:21.160 --> 0:03:22.760
<v Speaker 2>However, the industry is thriving.

0:03:23.040 --> 0:03:26.400
<v Speaker 3>If you look at twenty twenty five and twenty twenty six,

0:03:27.919 --> 0:03:31.080
<v Speaker 3>you know upwards to ninety percent of all new generation

0:03:31.960 --> 0:03:37.360
<v Speaker 3>is renewables, primarily solar and battery storage has been upwards

0:03:37.400 --> 0:03:42.400
<v Speaker 3>to eighty percent of new generation is solar and battery storage,

0:03:43.080 --> 0:03:46.800
<v Speaker 3>and largely that's because it's the most affordable cost of energy.

0:03:47.040 --> 0:03:50.200
<v Speaker 1>And so right now you know the deployment figures do

0:03:50.320 --> 0:03:53.480
<v Speaker 1>reach this record. But one of the reasons why we

0:03:53.520 --> 0:03:56.080
<v Speaker 1>are seeing a sped up deployment in twenty twenty five

0:03:56.120 --> 0:03:59.280
<v Speaker 1>and twenty twenty six is because there were these tax

0:03:59.360 --> 0:04:01.960
<v Speaker 1>credits that are supposed to expire. So from July for

0:04:02.160 --> 0:04:06.800
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty six, if your solo plant is not under construction,

0:04:07.400 --> 0:04:11.160
<v Speaker 1>you are not going to be getting US government credits.

0:04:12.040 --> 0:04:13.520
<v Speaker 1>Is the boom then over?

0:04:14.320 --> 0:04:15.240
<v Speaker 2>No, not at all.

0:04:15.600 --> 0:04:19.400
<v Speaker 3>And in reality, the you know, projects to qualify for

0:04:19.440 --> 0:04:22.960
<v Speaker 3>the tax credits, you know, have certain conditions where they

0:04:23.000 --> 0:04:25.799
<v Speaker 3>can qualify for starter construction. They need to be in

0:04:25.800 --> 0:04:29.840
<v Speaker 3>inter commercial operation by the end of twenty thirty, so

0:04:29.880 --> 0:04:33.360
<v Speaker 3>we have you know, a number more years of where

0:04:33.520 --> 0:04:37.040
<v Speaker 3>tax credits will be applied, and frankly that helps keep

0:04:37.320 --> 0:04:40.560
<v Speaker 3>you know, electricity prices down. My view is with or

0:04:40.560 --> 0:04:43.039
<v Speaker 3>without tax credits, and I think the industry's view is

0:04:43.040 --> 0:04:46.120
<v Speaker 3>with or without tax credits, we're the most competitive source

0:04:46.120 --> 0:04:47.719
<v Speaker 3>of electricity out there.

0:04:48.160 --> 0:04:52.240
<v Speaker 2>You take away the tax credits, it raises the cost.

0:04:51.960 --> 0:04:57.480
<v Speaker 3>Of the most affordable electricity price, but we're still you know,

0:04:57.680 --> 0:05:01.400
<v Speaker 3>much more competitive than the natural game, or certainly more

0:05:01.400 --> 0:05:04.440
<v Speaker 3>competitive than nuclear new nuclear or new coal.

0:05:05.480 --> 0:05:08.640
<v Speaker 1>But I'm looking at bloomerg en ef forecasts for solar

0:05:08.680 --> 0:05:12.200
<v Speaker 1>for example, and they peak in twenty twenty six and

0:05:12.240 --> 0:05:15.600
<v Speaker 1>start to decline all the way till twenty thirty one

0:05:15.720 --> 0:05:19.080
<v Speaker 1>and only really reach the twenty twenty six levels in

0:05:19.200 --> 0:05:21.480
<v Speaker 1>twenty thirty two. So there is a decline. It's not

0:05:21.560 --> 0:05:23.919
<v Speaker 1>like it's going to zero. It's going from something like

0:05:24.040 --> 0:05:27.200
<v Speaker 1>fifty gig awards built, which includes all types of solar

0:05:27.240 --> 0:05:30.040
<v Speaker 1>by the way, down to forty gigawats and then back

0:05:30.120 --> 0:05:32.960
<v Speaker 1>up to fifty in six years time. But there is

0:05:33.000 --> 0:05:33.960
<v Speaker 1>a decline, right.

0:05:34.080 --> 0:05:36.839
<v Speaker 3>Well, I mean you could argue whether it's the decline

0:05:36.880 --> 0:05:38.799
<v Speaker 3>or whether we have this you know, kind of short

0:05:38.880 --> 0:05:44.559
<v Speaker 3>term boom that's resulting in an increase in renewables for

0:05:44.800 --> 0:05:46.919
<v Speaker 3>a short period of time while the tax credits are

0:05:46.960 --> 0:05:49.839
<v Speaker 3>still in effect, and then it goes back now down

0:05:49.920 --> 0:05:52.440
<v Speaker 3>to a normal level. I mean even the normal level,

0:05:52.440 --> 0:05:53.920
<v Speaker 3>I mean forty gigawatts a year.

0:05:55.320 --> 0:05:57.040
<v Speaker 2>You know, if a decade ago you said.

0:05:56.800 --> 0:05:58.800
<v Speaker 3>We're going to build forty gigawottes a year of when

0:05:58.920 --> 0:06:02.480
<v Speaker 3>when we're building a tenth of that, it would be

0:06:02.560 --> 0:06:05.040
<v Speaker 3>kind of an amazing figure to look at. So foty

0:06:05.080 --> 0:06:09.560
<v Speaker 3>gigawatts a year is you know, one hundred billion dollars

0:06:09.640 --> 0:06:13.719
<v Speaker 3>of construction on renewable energy projects, which is tremendous amount

0:06:13.760 --> 0:06:14.239
<v Speaker 3>of growth.

0:06:14.520 --> 0:06:16.599
<v Speaker 1>So you've just signed this three and a half billion

0:06:16.640 --> 0:06:21.440
<v Speaker 1>dollar financingdea for one of US's biggest solar and battery projects.

0:06:21.960 --> 0:06:25.800
<v Speaker 1>Just put it in context. China, India, and even the

0:06:25.920 --> 0:06:29.719
<v Speaker 1>UE have built far bigger projects, but for the US

0:06:29.800 --> 0:06:32.320
<v Speaker 1>it is one of the biggest. How long does it

0:06:32.400 --> 0:06:33.440
<v Speaker 1>take to build it?

0:06:33.440 --> 0:06:36.640
<v Speaker 2>It's about a two just over two year construction period.

0:06:36.640 --> 0:06:40.760
<v Speaker 3>I mean the first phase will start generating electricity by

0:06:41.560 --> 0:06:45.680
<v Speaker 3>say mid twenty twenty eight. The first two phases are

0:06:46.200 --> 0:06:50.080
<v Speaker 3>one point six gigawatts of solar PV and then one

0:06:50.160 --> 0:06:54.160
<v Speaker 3>point nine gigawatt hours of battery storage.

0:06:54.240 --> 0:06:55.360
<v Speaker 2>There's a third phase.

0:06:55.520 --> 0:06:58.080
<v Speaker 3>They're kind of three equal phases, So there's a third

0:06:58.080 --> 0:07:01.120
<v Speaker 3>phase that we're hoping to start construction later this year

0:07:01.240 --> 0:07:04.440
<v Speaker 3>or early next. That third phase would be into operation

0:07:04.560 --> 0:07:06.040
<v Speaker 3>by the end of twenty twenty nine.

0:07:06.240 --> 0:07:09.240
<v Speaker 1>Where are the solar panels and batteries for these projects

0:07:09.240 --> 0:07:09.920
<v Speaker 1>coming from?

0:07:10.280 --> 0:07:13.520
<v Speaker 3>Solar panels are one hundred percent US made for solar,

0:07:14.160 --> 0:07:17.080
<v Speaker 3>so it's and they're you know for solo has some

0:07:17.160 --> 0:07:21.280
<v Speaker 3>overseas manufacturing. But these these these panels are one hundred

0:07:21.280 --> 0:07:24.360
<v Speaker 3>percent main in the US. We're also quite proud that's

0:07:24.600 --> 0:07:27.320
<v Speaker 3>that it's the vast majority of the steel is actually

0:07:27.320 --> 0:07:30.240
<v Speaker 3>being manufactured in Mississippi County, Arkansas. You know, we like

0:07:30.360 --> 0:07:32.800
<v Speaker 3>to refer to the project as built on Arkansas steel.

0:07:33.200 --> 0:07:36.800
<v Speaker 3>The batteries are coming from LG and their US manufacturing

0:07:36.840 --> 0:07:40.120
<v Speaker 3>as well. You know, for those that think you can't

0:07:41.040 --> 0:07:46.360
<v Speaker 3>supply the renewable energy industry with US manufacturing, that's happening

0:07:46.520 --> 0:07:48.600
<v Speaker 3>as we speak. I mean, tens of billions of dollars

0:07:48.640 --> 0:07:53.280
<v Speaker 3>have been invested in US manufacturing and that's continuing to

0:07:53.320 --> 0:07:57.960
<v Speaker 3>supply and will continue to disupply US renewable energy projects

0:07:58.000 --> 0:07:59.280
<v Speaker 3>for the foreseeable future.

0:07:59.520 --> 0:08:03.960
<v Speaker 1>And what about the battery metals that LG users to

0:08:04.000 --> 0:08:06.960
<v Speaker 1>be able to make those batteries.

0:08:07.080 --> 0:08:09.600
<v Speaker 3>Well that I mean there are some certainly there are

0:08:09.600 --> 0:08:11.720
<v Speaker 3>some components that are coming from overseas.

0:08:12.560 --> 0:08:14.560
<v Speaker 2>You know, I don't think.

0:08:14.440 --> 0:08:18.440
<v Speaker 3>You could pull look at one energy industry supply, whether

0:08:18.520 --> 0:08:22.200
<v Speaker 3>it's natural gas or nuclear or coal, and look at

0:08:22.240 --> 0:08:25.200
<v Speaker 3>and say, are one hundred percent of all components coming

0:08:25.200 --> 0:08:28.600
<v Speaker 3>from US manufacturers. I would like to think that renewable energy.

0:08:29.000 --> 0:08:31.640
<v Speaker 3>You know, the percent of components that are coming from

0:08:31.760 --> 0:08:35.880
<v Speaker 3>US is greater than most of those other other electricity supply.

0:08:36.679 --> 0:08:39.119
<v Speaker 3>You know, a lot of the nuclear technology now is overseas.

0:08:39.679 --> 0:08:43.160
<v Speaker 3>Two out of the three main gas turbine manufacturers are overseas.

0:08:43.360 --> 0:08:46.360
<v Speaker 3>Like I said, I think renewable energy and solar and

0:08:46.600 --> 0:08:51.320
<v Speaker 3>battery storage specifically are being dominated by US components supply.

0:08:51.640 --> 0:08:53.760
<v Speaker 1>And you talked about the fact that you know, solar

0:08:53.840 --> 0:08:56.400
<v Speaker 1>and batteries are now the cheapest that can be offered

0:08:56.440 --> 0:09:00.360
<v Speaker 1>to US consumers. How much cheaper would they be if

0:09:00.400 --> 0:09:02.800
<v Speaker 1>there were no restrictions on imports.

0:09:03.000 --> 0:09:05.360
<v Speaker 3>Well, if that would you know, I mean, we've got

0:09:05.360 --> 0:09:08.360
<v Speaker 3>two things happening. One is is that the tax credits

0:09:08.360 --> 0:09:11.800
<v Speaker 3>are being taken away, and you know, we're paying you know,

0:09:12.040 --> 0:09:16.600
<v Speaker 3>probably for solar panels. We're probably in some cases paying

0:09:16.679 --> 0:09:17.839
<v Speaker 3>triple what the rest of.

0:09:17.800 --> 0:09:18.680
<v Speaker 2>The world is paying.

0:09:18.920 --> 0:09:23.199
<v Speaker 3>You know, you know, we're you know, panel prices right now,

0:09:23.280 --> 0:09:25.840
<v Speaker 3>Solar module prices are in the you know call it,

0:09:26.160 --> 0:09:29.280
<v Speaker 3>you know, thirty two to thirty eight cent range, depending

0:09:29.320 --> 0:09:33.360
<v Speaker 3>on the time of year and who your supplier supplier is.

0:09:33.880 --> 0:09:35.720
<v Speaker 3>You know, the rest of the world can can get

0:09:36.679 --> 0:09:39.720
<v Speaker 3>less expensive panels in the in the low teens twelve

0:09:39.840 --> 0:09:44.199
<v Speaker 3>thirteen cents a lot, and all that all that tariff

0:09:44.280 --> 0:09:47.520
<v Speaker 3>is being passed through to electricity consumers. So you and

0:09:47.559 --> 0:09:49.679
<v Speaker 3>I are paying that in our electricity bills.

0:09:50.280 --> 0:09:52.480
<v Speaker 1>Well I am based in london' so not me yet, but.

0:09:52.760 --> 0:09:54.840
<v Speaker 2>Certainly I pay it in my electricity bills.

0:09:55.040 --> 0:09:57.440
<v Speaker 3>All those tariffs are you know, have to be passed

0:09:57.480 --> 0:10:01.240
<v Speaker 3>through into capital costs and passed through to electricity prices.

0:10:01.440 --> 0:10:05.840
<v Speaker 1>And what about batteries If you compare no imports with tariffs.

0:10:05.360 --> 0:10:08.760
<v Speaker 2>On yeah, I mean we're similar issue. It's probably not triple.

0:10:08.840 --> 0:10:12.160
<v Speaker 3>I would probably say it's it's certainly close to double

0:10:12.200 --> 0:10:16.439
<v Speaker 3>what international projects are dealing with with regards to battery

0:10:16.520 --> 0:10:20.760
<v Speaker 3>costs because of the tariff issues. So, as I said,

0:10:20.800 --> 0:10:24.559
<v Speaker 3>that increases capital costs and it increases prices to consumers.

0:10:24.800 --> 0:10:27.360
<v Speaker 1>A solar battery project right now is about twenty five

0:10:27.440 --> 0:10:30.640
<v Speaker 1>hundred dollars a killer. What in the US you said, roughly,

0:10:31.160 --> 0:10:36.120
<v Speaker 1>if you take these reductions and tear away the trade barriers,

0:10:36.559 --> 0:10:37.640
<v Speaker 1>what could it come down to?

0:10:38.640 --> 0:10:41.760
<v Speaker 3>You're certainly probably under fifteen hundred, I would think.

0:10:41.640 --> 0:10:44.640
<v Speaker 1>Given where the cost is today and where the trade

0:10:44.640 --> 0:10:48.120
<v Speaker 1>barriers are and where future looks like, which doesn't look

0:10:48.200 --> 0:10:51.200
<v Speaker 1>like it's going to come down anytime soon these trade barriers.

0:10:51.600 --> 0:10:55.520
<v Speaker 1>How does the pipeline for you and developers like you

0:10:55.640 --> 0:10:56.440
<v Speaker 1>look like today?

0:10:56.720 --> 0:11:00.120
<v Speaker 3>Well, obviously, we have projects that we're proceeding with in

0:10:59.880 --> 0:11:02.400
<v Speaker 3>the over the next several years that would qualify for

0:11:02.480 --> 0:11:05.760
<v Speaker 3>tax credits. As the tax credits start to roll off,

0:11:06.000 --> 0:11:08.680
<v Speaker 3>we're going to have to increase our electricity prices, you know.

0:11:08.800 --> 0:11:13.679
<v Speaker 3>So I like to talk generically about a sixty dollars

0:11:13.679 --> 0:11:18.280
<v Speaker 3>a megawat hour solar project today with tax credits, without

0:11:18.320 --> 0:11:20.920
<v Speaker 3>tax credits is probably more like eighty five or ninety

0:11:20.960 --> 0:11:23.959
<v Speaker 3>dollars a megawat hour. But you compare that against a

0:11:24.080 --> 0:11:27.720
<v Speaker 3>natural gas project combined cycle project with you know, top

0:11:27.760 --> 0:11:30.600
<v Speaker 3>of the line equipment, you know, high efficiency gas turbines,

0:11:31.000 --> 0:11:33.000
<v Speaker 3>you're probably in the one hundred and twenty to one

0:11:33.080 --> 0:11:33.720
<v Speaker 3>hundred and.

0:11:33.600 --> 0:11:35.640
<v Speaker 2>Forty dollars a megawatt hour range.

0:11:36.000 --> 0:11:40.119
<v Speaker 3>So we're still even with rolling off the tax credits

0:11:40.200 --> 0:11:43.440
<v Speaker 3>and with paying all these tariffs, we're still cheaper than

0:11:43.480 --> 0:11:45.319
<v Speaker 3>a natural gas combined cycle facility.

0:11:45.960 --> 0:11:48.640
<v Speaker 1>And so for this first phase of the Steel River

0:11:48.840 --> 0:11:52.120
<v Speaker 1>Energy Center in Arkansas that you're building, where is the

0:11:52.120 --> 0:11:54.840
<v Speaker 1>electricity going to go. I'm assuming a data center.

0:11:55.040 --> 0:11:58.640
<v Speaker 3>In reality that that project is grid connected. Okay, so

0:11:58.679 --> 0:12:01.200
<v Speaker 3>we we sell a hundred percent of our electricity to

0:12:01.240 --> 0:12:06.360
<v Speaker 3>the grid. We have a i'll say a financial contract

0:12:06.480 --> 0:12:08.480
<v Speaker 3>with a tech player that will.

0:12:08.280 --> 0:12:10.240
<v Speaker 2>Be announced next month.

0:12:11.040 --> 0:12:15.520
<v Speaker 3>But Entergy Arkansas is receiving all the energy under their

0:12:15.520 --> 0:12:19.800
<v Speaker 3>transmission system and they're distributing it across their network. Like

0:12:19.840 --> 0:12:22.840
<v Speaker 3>I said, we have a financial structure with a tech

0:12:22.880 --> 0:12:25.600
<v Speaker 3>player to give us a guarantee on the price that

0:12:25.640 --> 0:12:27.040
<v Speaker 3>we're getting for our electricity.

0:12:27.440 --> 0:12:29.680
<v Speaker 2>That's a bit more financial transaction.

0:12:29.760 --> 0:12:32.520
<v Speaker 3>The actual electrons are going to the grid and being

0:12:32.559 --> 0:12:34.280
<v Speaker 3>distributed by Entergy Arkansas.

0:12:34.600 --> 0:12:37.480
<v Speaker 1>Seven eight years ago, you did an interview with CGTN

0:12:37.520 --> 0:12:40.320
<v Speaker 1>where you said, you know, India and China are building

0:12:40.360 --> 0:12:42.640
<v Speaker 1>a lot of renewables because those are the countries where

0:12:42.640 --> 0:12:46.079
<v Speaker 1>electricity demand is growing at seven eight percent, and when

0:12:46.120 --> 0:12:49.280
<v Speaker 1>there's growth, the industry grows. You can now say the

0:12:49.320 --> 0:12:52.600
<v Speaker 1>same thing in the US for that electricity demand is

0:12:52.600 --> 0:12:54.920
<v Speaker 1>now finally growing, maybe not eight percent, but it's growing

0:12:55.000 --> 0:12:58.160
<v Speaker 1>three four five percent, and a lot of that is

0:12:58.200 --> 0:13:01.960
<v Speaker 1>to do with AI and data centers. One thing that

0:13:02.000 --> 0:13:06.440
<v Speaker 1>we've seen in these data center stories is that these

0:13:06.520 --> 0:13:09.880
<v Speaker 1>companies want to build these data centers really quickly, and

0:13:09.920 --> 0:13:12.400
<v Speaker 1>then they want an uptime that is ninety nine point

0:13:12.440 --> 0:13:14.920
<v Speaker 1>nine percent of the time. Now, solar and batteries can

0:13:14.960 --> 0:13:16.880
<v Speaker 1>be built fast. You know, you're talking about two year

0:13:17.000 --> 0:13:19.640
<v Speaker 1>project to build one of the largest solar and battery

0:13:19.679 --> 0:13:22.440
<v Speaker 1>project in the US. But gas and batteries can keep

0:13:22.480 --> 0:13:25.760
<v Speaker 1>the uptime that they need, and right now it seems

0:13:25.840 --> 0:13:30.400
<v Speaker 1>like gas plus batteries are winning out. How can renewables

0:13:30.440 --> 0:13:32.240
<v Speaker 1>compete with those constraints.

0:13:32.400 --> 0:13:36.520
<v Speaker 3>I mean, that's interesting, interesting, I'll say statements in there.

0:13:36.559 --> 0:13:39.360
<v Speaker 3>So there's a few things going on. One is my

0:13:39.559 --> 0:13:42.960
<v Speaker 3>view is the vast majority of data centers, if in

0:13:43.040 --> 0:13:45.959
<v Speaker 3>order to get ninety nine point nine nine nine or

0:13:46.000 --> 0:13:50.400
<v Speaker 3>even ninety nine point nine, really need to be grid connected. Okay,

0:13:50.840 --> 0:13:53.920
<v Speaker 3>so there are a number of projects. You know, we

0:13:53.960 --> 0:13:57.760
<v Speaker 3>had a debate internally about how many of those behind

0:13:57.800 --> 0:14:01.200
<v Speaker 3>the meter projects we're getting built that we're off grid

0:14:01.400 --> 0:14:04.240
<v Speaker 3>and had this mix of gas and batteries and solar.

0:14:04.920 --> 0:14:06.280
<v Speaker 2>It's really kind of a handful.

0:14:06.600 --> 0:14:10.320
<v Speaker 3>Okay, The vast majority of data centers are in order

0:14:10.360 --> 0:14:12.440
<v Speaker 3>to get that reliability, are going to need to be

0:14:12.440 --> 0:14:16.000
<v Speaker 3>grid connected. With that as a backdrop that most of

0:14:16.000 --> 0:14:19.400
<v Speaker 3>them will be grid connected. Then solar and battery storage

0:14:19.640 --> 0:14:22.400
<v Speaker 3>is a great tool for the utilities to provide you know,

0:14:22.480 --> 0:14:26.200
<v Speaker 3>affordable energy. They've got to mix you know, their own

0:14:26.240 --> 0:14:29.320
<v Speaker 3>base where where it includes a mix of fossil fuels

0:14:29.360 --> 0:14:34.400
<v Speaker 3>and nuclear and renewables to serve that load. So, you know,

0:14:35.000 --> 0:14:38.400
<v Speaker 3>and we are looking at, you know, for a data

0:14:38.440 --> 0:14:41.600
<v Speaker 3>center that does need a behind the meter solution, we

0:14:41.720 --> 0:14:45.120
<v Speaker 3>are looking at a mix of solar and battery storage

0:14:45.200 --> 0:14:49.040
<v Speaker 3>and potentially some natural gas in there. But like I said,

0:14:49.480 --> 0:14:53.320
<v Speaker 3>my view is eighty percent plus of data centers that

0:14:53.400 --> 0:14:54.960
<v Speaker 3>go in are going to be grid connected.

0:14:55.240 --> 0:14:58.760
<v Speaker 1>That might be true this year, next year, but it

0:14:58.880 --> 0:15:02.360
<v Speaker 1>looks like when I look again projections from bloomaginnyf's new

0:15:02.480 --> 0:15:06.360
<v Speaker 1>Energy Outlook that was just recently published purely at data

0:15:06.440 --> 0:15:10.920
<v Speaker 1>Center driven edition on the grid, it starts to become

0:15:11.120 --> 0:15:14.720
<v Speaker 1>gas heavy starting in twenty twenty seven all the way

0:15:14.720 --> 0:15:18.240
<v Speaker 1>to twenty thirty five. By twenty thirty five, we are

0:15:18.240 --> 0:15:22.520
<v Speaker 1>looking at eighty to ninety percent of the additional power

0:15:22.600 --> 0:15:27.160
<v Speaker 1>demand for data centers being met by gas. Are they wrong?

0:15:27.400 --> 0:15:31.160
<v Speaker 3>I've looked at other projections, you know, from the International

0:15:31.240 --> 0:15:35.960
<v Speaker 3>Energy Association from you know, the National Energy Resources from

0:15:36.160 --> 0:15:40.800
<v Speaker 3>you know, Wood Mackenzie. We're still seeing substantial amount of

0:15:40.920 --> 0:15:45.040
<v Speaker 3>growth and supply from solar and battery stores. I mean

0:15:45.040 --> 0:15:49.000
<v Speaker 3>you you talked about forty gigawatts a year. Even five

0:15:49.080 --> 0:15:51.800
<v Speaker 3>years ago, forty gigawatts was would be viewed as a

0:15:51.840 --> 0:15:56.800
<v Speaker 3>tremendous amount of growth in the solar space projections.

0:15:57.200 --> 0:15:59.560
<v Speaker 2>Will be interesting to see how that all sorts itself out.

0:16:00.160 --> 0:16:03.840
<v Speaker 3>What's happening today, ninety percent of all new generation is

0:16:03.840 --> 0:16:05.880
<v Speaker 3>coming from renewables in battery storage.

0:16:06.200 --> 0:16:08.080
<v Speaker 2>Now will that change?

0:16:08.320 --> 0:16:11.120
<v Speaker 3>Yes, I believe there will be more natural gas put

0:16:10.920 --> 0:16:14.040
<v Speaker 3>on the under the system. But when you talk about

0:16:14.320 --> 0:16:19.280
<v Speaker 3>i'll say grid connected, you know nuclear and natural gas.

0:16:19.560 --> 0:16:21.320
<v Speaker 3>You know they need that one hundred and twenty one

0:16:21.400 --> 0:16:25.200
<v Speaker 3>hundred and forty dollars price round the clock. Okay, So

0:16:25.320 --> 0:16:28.880
<v Speaker 3>even when power prices drop to twenty or thirty dollars

0:16:28.920 --> 0:16:31.240
<v Speaker 3>in the middle of the night, and the grid could

0:16:31.240 --> 0:16:35.880
<v Speaker 3>provide very cost effective power because demand is low in

0:16:35.920 --> 0:16:38.760
<v Speaker 3>the middle of the night, that gas turbine project or

0:16:38.800 --> 0:16:41.360
<v Speaker 3>that nuclear project's got to continue to generate in.

0:16:41.400 --> 0:16:44.400
<v Speaker 2>Order to pay its off its its capital costs.

0:16:44.800 --> 0:16:46.880
<v Speaker 1>So this is where I think the global numbers and

0:16:46.920 --> 0:16:50.640
<v Speaker 1>the US numbers actually diverge drastically. And you look at

0:16:50.680 --> 0:16:53.560
<v Speaker 1>a global picture, and the global picture certainly says that

0:16:53.600 --> 0:16:55.520
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the power demand will be met by

0:16:55.600 --> 0:16:58.880
<v Speaker 1>solar and batteries, a little bit of wind. But when

0:16:58.920 --> 0:17:02.400
<v Speaker 1>it comes to the US, it's the only place, the

0:17:02.440 --> 0:17:07.919
<v Speaker 1>only large economy that is increasing its gas power load

0:17:08.119 --> 0:17:10.800
<v Speaker 1>from twenty twenty five to twenty thirty five. But you

0:17:10.880 --> 0:17:15.400
<v Speaker 1>don't think that's the case because financially, renewables have to win.

0:17:15.960 --> 0:17:19.280
<v Speaker 3>I'll say yes, simpler answers, yes, I mean the dynamics

0:17:19.320 --> 0:17:21.520
<v Speaker 3>in the US are a little bit different. Number one

0:17:21.640 --> 0:17:26.800
<v Speaker 3>is we're penalizing heavily with tariffs renewable energy, so we're

0:17:27.840 --> 0:17:30.520
<v Speaker 3>we're forcing prices higher than they normally would be.

0:17:30.600 --> 0:17:32.000
<v Speaker 2>The rest of the world isn't doing that.

0:17:32.400 --> 0:17:34.400
<v Speaker 3>The rest of the world is trying to do the opposite,

0:17:35.280 --> 0:17:39.240
<v Speaker 3>is restricting barriers. The other dynamic is that US does

0:17:39.280 --> 0:17:43.240
<v Speaker 3>have an abundance of natural gas, and our cost of

0:17:43.320 --> 0:17:45.639
<v Speaker 3>natural gas is cheaper than the rest of the world.

0:17:45.720 --> 0:17:50.439
<v Speaker 3>Now as we build more LNG terminals and natural gas

0:17:50.480 --> 0:17:54.800
<v Speaker 3>becomes a bit more like oil a commodity, a worldwide commodity,

0:17:54.840 --> 0:17:57.679
<v Speaker 3>as opposed to trapped gas in the US, then the

0:17:57.680 --> 0:18:01.600
<v Speaker 3>price of natural gas will rise and that'll affect obviously,

0:18:01.960 --> 0:18:05.320
<v Speaker 3>you know, the build I'm you know, very bullish on

0:18:05.480 --> 0:18:09.280
<v Speaker 3>solar and battery storage, even at the forty to fifty

0:18:09.280 --> 0:18:13.280
<v Speaker 3>gigawatte level that we talked about, you know, because I actually,

0:18:13.520 --> 0:18:16.520
<v Speaker 3>you know, solar largely if you look at the projections,

0:18:16.600 --> 0:18:19.040
<v Speaker 3>you know, from twenty years ago and from fifteen years

0:18:19.080 --> 0:18:22.080
<v Speaker 3>ago and from ten years ago, solar has beaten all

0:18:22.119 --> 0:18:25.560
<v Speaker 3>of those projections, and I'm pretty bullish that it'll continue

0:18:25.600 --> 0:18:25.919
<v Speaker 3>to do that.

0:18:26.840 --> 0:18:29.640
<v Speaker 1>One other bearish note on solar that I should bring

0:18:29.720 --> 0:18:33.280
<v Speaker 1>up then is the residential solar industry in the US,

0:18:33.960 --> 0:18:37.080
<v Speaker 1>which install about four gigabitz of solar in twenty twenty six,

0:18:37.280 --> 0:18:41.040
<v Speaker 1>fifteen percent lower than last year and less than half

0:18:41.080 --> 0:18:43.520
<v Speaker 1>of what was installed in twenty twenty three. And a

0:18:43.600 --> 0:18:45.960
<v Speaker 1>large part of that is because of the removal of

0:18:46.200 --> 0:18:49.520
<v Speaker 1>federal subsidies on rooftop solar and the fact that you

0:18:49.520 --> 0:18:53.200
<v Speaker 1>have all these startups, et cetera. You don't worry that

0:18:53.200 --> 0:18:57.240
<v Speaker 1>that kind of impact that's come on a residential solar

0:18:57.320 --> 0:19:00.439
<v Speaker 1>will come to the utility scale projects that you work on.

0:19:00.760 --> 0:19:03.600
<v Speaker 3>It's a completely different market, you know, I mean, putting

0:19:04.119 --> 0:19:06.880
<v Speaker 3>twenty or thirty panels on a roof is a whole

0:19:06.880 --> 0:19:10.840
<v Speaker 3>lot more expensive than you know, building two million panels

0:19:10.880 --> 0:19:14.720
<v Speaker 3>on farmland in Arkansas or in a ranch in Texas.

0:19:14.760 --> 0:19:18.119
<v Speaker 3>So the demand that we're seeing on the solar side

0:19:18.520 --> 0:19:21.320
<v Speaker 3>is going to continue to grow our business.

0:19:25.520 --> 0:19:28.919
<v Speaker 1>After the break, I asked Kevin whether President Trump's anti

0:19:28.960 --> 0:19:41.280
<v Speaker 1>wind crusade is going to come to solar. Going back

0:19:41.320 --> 0:19:44.560
<v Speaker 1>to your point about electricity demand and that sort of

0:19:44.720 --> 0:19:50.160
<v Speaker 1>helping the solar and battery boom in the US, there

0:19:50.280 --> 0:19:54.080
<v Speaker 1>is a fear that perhaps maybe all those demand may

0:19:54.160 --> 0:19:58.639
<v Speaker 1>not pan out. That could be a bare case for

0:19:58.840 --> 0:20:01.840
<v Speaker 1>here data centers. The other bare case could be that

0:20:01.960 --> 0:20:05.800
<v Speaker 1>air data centers are not popular. Lots of people oppose

0:20:05.880 --> 0:20:09.199
<v Speaker 1>them just for how they look or the noise they produce,

0:20:09.359 --> 0:20:12.000
<v Speaker 1>or others oppose them because they are increasing power builds.

0:20:12.000 --> 0:20:16.160
<v Speaker 1>As you talked about, that could also start to reduce

0:20:16.600 --> 0:20:18.600
<v Speaker 1>the number of data centers that get built in the

0:20:18.720 --> 0:20:23.440
<v Speaker 1>US just from a power demand perspective. If that comes

0:20:23.480 --> 0:20:26.359
<v Speaker 1>to pass, If there is not quite the bull case

0:20:26.400 --> 0:20:29.359
<v Speaker 1>for power demand for data centers, does it affect the

0:20:29.600 --> 0:20:31.720
<v Speaker 1>future for renewables? You think in the US.

0:20:32.560 --> 0:20:35.240
<v Speaker 3>Well, you know, as I've kind of said, you know

0:20:35.359 --> 0:20:40.960
<v Speaker 3>multiple times, the solar and battery storage is the most affordable, okay,

0:20:41.040 --> 0:20:45.000
<v Speaker 3>and it's also quickest to market. Now, a behind the

0:20:45.040 --> 0:20:48.840
<v Speaker 3>meter natural gas fire project for a data center that

0:20:48.920 --> 0:20:53.240
<v Speaker 3>needs to provide five nine's reliability is a very expensive facility.

0:20:54.320 --> 0:20:56.840
<v Speaker 3>If the data center load goes down and you don't

0:20:57.040 --> 0:21:01.160
<v Speaker 3>have as many of those behind the meter product, then

0:21:01.320 --> 0:21:04.040
<v Speaker 3>you'll likely it'll come out of the natural gas side

0:21:04.040 --> 0:21:06.800
<v Speaker 3>of the of the model, not so much out of

0:21:06.800 --> 0:21:11.200
<v Speaker 3>the solar and battery storage, which is largely grid connected solar.

0:21:11.720 --> 0:21:14.240
<v Speaker 3>Some people talk about data center is about fifty percent

0:21:14.280 --> 0:21:16.840
<v Speaker 3>of the growth, you know, or sixty percent of the

0:21:16.880 --> 0:21:17.760
<v Speaker 3>growth that we're.

0:21:17.560 --> 0:21:19.800
<v Speaker 2>Going to see in electricity demand.

0:21:20.200 --> 0:21:24.480
<v Speaker 3>But there's electrification going on across the across the country,

0:21:24.640 --> 0:21:28.960
<v Speaker 3>you know, manufacturing activities, you know, electric vehicles. We are

0:21:29.080 --> 0:21:32.280
<v Speaker 3>continuing to see growth that is non data center related.

0:21:32.440 --> 0:21:35.719
<v Speaker 3>But as you point out, if that data center growth

0:21:36.000 --> 0:21:41.000
<v Speaker 3>doesn't materialize as we expect, my expectations are probably means

0:21:41.000 --> 0:21:42.760
<v Speaker 3>that we build blessed natural gas.

0:21:43.080 --> 0:21:46.640
<v Speaker 1>It's worth mentioning wind as well. In twenty twenty five,

0:21:46.680 --> 0:21:49.720
<v Speaker 1>President Trump signed an executive order holding the permitting of

0:21:49.800 --> 0:21:52.560
<v Speaker 1>new wind projects. That was challenged in courts, and a

0:21:52.600 --> 0:21:56.639
<v Speaker 1>federal judge blocked that executive order, and this month the

0:21:56.680 --> 0:22:01.160
<v Speaker 1>Trump administration has decided not to appeal. But then there

0:22:01.240 --> 0:22:05.000
<v Speaker 1>is a new case that's been brought by renewable groups

0:22:05.119 --> 0:22:08.280
<v Speaker 1>who are suing the US government because the Pentagon, the

0:22:08.280 --> 0:22:12.440
<v Speaker 1>Department of Defense is holding back the review of wind

0:22:12.440 --> 0:22:16.680
<v Speaker 1>power projects, which has really brought wind development to a halt.

0:22:17.560 --> 0:22:21.040
<v Speaker 1>Do you think this anti wind crusade is going to

0:22:21.040 --> 0:22:21.760
<v Speaker 1>come to solar?

0:22:22.080 --> 0:22:26.240
<v Speaker 3>It doesn't appear that it will, okay, And and mostly

0:22:26.320 --> 0:22:29.360
<v Speaker 3>because I think I think the economics are clear, and

0:22:29.440 --> 0:22:33.240
<v Speaker 3>the and the the amount of solar and battery stores

0:22:33.359 --> 0:22:37.080
<v Speaker 3>that's that's helping helping the grid and helping keep electricity

0:22:37.119 --> 0:22:40.600
<v Speaker 3>prices down. It doesn't make any sense to try and

0:22:40.640 --> 0:22:44.879
<v Speaker 3>shut that off. It'll likely raise electricity prices. But the

0:22:44.920 --> 0:22:51.359
<v Speaker 3>administration seems to have i'll say, a non economic, non technical,

0:22:51.960 --> 0:22:55.600
<v Speaker 3>adverse reaction to building wind, which doesn't make a whole

0:22:55.640 --> 0:22:56.320
<v Speaker 3>lot of sense either.

0:22:56.440 --> 0:23:00.600
<v Speaker 1>Quite frankly, now taking more of global view, and you

0:23:00.600 --> 0:23:03.119
<v Speaker 1>know you've worked in renewable energy projects outside of the

0:23:03.200 --> 0:23:07.040
<v Speaker 1>US as well. One framing that shows up again and

0:23:07.080 --> 0:23:11.240
<v Speaker 1>again is that look oil and gas companies, they are

0:23:11.680 --> 0:23:16.160
<v Speaker 1>high risk but high reward. Renewable energy companies now they're

0:23:16.200 --> 0:23:19.320
<v Speaker 1>kind of low risk, low reward. Do you think low

0:23:19.400 --> 0:23:23.679
<v Speaker 1>profitability in renewables is holding back the industry historically?

0:23:23.800 --> 0:23:27.040
<v Speaker 3>Returns you know, over the last five years, returns on

0:23:27.280 --> 0:23:31.280
<v Speaker 3>investments in renewable energy have been lower than and the

0:23:31.320 --> 0:23:36.040
<v Speaker 3>oil and gas sector. Post COVID and the and the

0:23:36.080 --> 0:23:40.919
<v Speaker 3>war in Ukraine and now the war in Iran, we

0:23:41.040 --> 0:23:44.760
<v Speaker 3>have seen over the last couple of years returns because

0:23:44.760 --> 0:23:45.440
<v Speaker 3>of the demand.

0:23:45.960 --> 0:23:50.919
<v Speaker 2>We have seen returns for renewable energy projects improves substantially.

0:23:51.080 --> 0:23:54.280
<v Speaker 2>But they are lower risk, okay, which you know, you know,

0:23:54.320 --> 0:23:58.480
<v Speaker 2>a lot of utilities, pension funds, you know, other investors

0:23:58.760 --> 0:24:03.560
<v Speaker 2>like that low risk profile that renewable energy provides. So

0:24:03.640 --> 0:24:06.560
<v Speaker 2>there is a segment of the market that likes to

0:24:06.680 --> 0:24:07.199
<v Speaker 2>drill and.

0:24:08.800 --> 0:24:12.320
<v Speaker 3>Is willing to take those high risk, high return, higher return,

0:24:12.440 --> 0:24:17.240
<v Speaker 3>potentially higher return projects. And there's also a significant segment

0:24:17.720 --> 0:24:21.639
<v Speaker 3>that's looking for lower risk but still strong returns. I mean,

0:24:21.640 --> 0:24:24.760
<v Speaker 3>we're seeing pretty strong returns in the renewable energy sector

0:24:25.200 --> 0:24:29.960
<v Speaker 3>these days, maybe not quite as high as a return

0:24:30.040 --> 0:24:32.840
<v Speaker 3>if you decide you want to do a weldcapt drilling

0:24:32.880 --> 0:24:37.720
<v Speaker 3>program in West Texas, but it's a completely different risk profile.

0:24:37.880 --> 0:24:40.600
<v Speaker 1>Is there anything that can be done to increase the

0:24:40.640 --> 0:24:43.280
<v Speaker 1>profitability of renewable energy industry?

0:24:43.480 --> 0:24:46.760
<v Speaker 3>You know, those things have a tendency to sort itself

0:24:46.800 --> 0:24:49.719
<v Speaker 3>out based on supply and demand of investors as well.

0:24:50.280 --> 0:24:54.479
<v Speaker 3>If there was a shortage of investors in renewable energy,

0:24:54.680 --> 0:24:58.240
<v Speaker 3>you would see returns rise, okay, but there isn't a

0:24:58.280 --> 0:25:02.119
<v Speaker 3>shortage of investors in removal energy sector, both on the

0:25:02.160 --> 0:25:05.640
<v Speaker 3>debt side, you know, tax equity. You know, while those

0:25:05.680 --> 0:25:09.960
<v Speaker 3>tax credits exist and the equity players like ourselves, you know,

0:25:10.119 --> 0:25:14.920
<v Speaker 3>there isn't necessarily a shortage. But like I said, returns

0:25:15.000 --> 0:25:18.480
<v Speaker 3>have have have risen, you know, to double digits over

0:25:18.520 --> 0:25:21.760
<v Speaker 3>the last several years, and so you know, we see

0:25:21.840 --> 0:25:26.840
<v Speaker 3>adequate and I'll say substantial amount of investment, investment appetite

0:25:26.920 --> 0:25:29.840
<v Speaker 3>still looking at investing tens of billions of dollars of

0:25:29.840 --> 0:25:32.959
<v Speaker 3>a year per year in in renewable energy projects.

0:25:33.040 --> 0:25:36.600
<v Speaker 1>We are seeing though, in markets where solar penetration has

0:25:36.640 --> 0:25:39.879
<v Speaker 1>been high, that investments are starting to slow down because

0:25:39.880 --> 0:25:43.440
<v Speaker 1>you're getting so many hours of what we call negative

0:25:43.440 --> 0:25:46.800
<v Speaker 1>electricity prices essentially, this too much solar than what the

0:25:47.400 --> 0:25:52.320
<v Speaker 1>grid can consume. That of course is encouraging battery storage,

0:25:52.440 --> 0:25:56.919
<v Speaker 1>but it has just because of the negative electricity prices

0:25:56.960 --> 0:25:59.760
<v Speaker 1>and hours hundreds of hours now here in Europe for

0:25:59.800 --> 0:26:04.399
<v Speaker 1>a sample, it's starting to slow down the deployment of

0:26:04.440 --> 0:26:08.400
<v Speaker 1>solar as a result, and also, of course it affects

0:26:08.440 --> 0:26:11.719
<v Speaker 1>the profitability of those projects. Is there a way that

0:26:12.080 --> 0:26:15.760
<v Speaker 1>not just batteries, but other demand side projects could take off.

0:26:15.800 --> 0:26:19.359
<v Speaker 1>Are you seeing the growth of projects that want to

0:26:19.400 --> 0:26:23.360
<v Speaker 1>take advantage of negative price to electricity come through run

0:26:23.400 --> 0:26:26.320
<v Speaker 1>only in the hours when those prices exist.

0:26:27.320 --> 0:26:30.080
<v Speaker 2>Yes, I mean there are industries there, you know.

0:26:30.119 --> 0:26:33.399
<v Speaker 3>I mean, cryptocurrency is probably the one of the bigger ones.

0:26:33.640 --> 0:26:35.880
<v Speaker 3>You know, they you know, where where they can kind

0:26:35.880 --> 0:26:38.800
<v Speaker 3>of run when electricity prices are low. You know, there

0:26:38.840 --> 0:26:41.680
<v Speaker 3>are other industries that are looking at that. I mean,

0:26:41.680 --> 0:26:45.320
<v Speaker 3>the US market is quite a bit different in you know,

0:26:46.000 --> 0:26:50.159
<v Speaker 3>to a large extent, less advanced from renewable energy than

0:26:50.200 --> 0:26:53.960
<v Speaker 3>some of the European countries. So, you know, while California

0:26:54.000 --> 0:26:56.800
<v Speaker 3>and Texas talk about times of the year where there's

0:26:56.840 --> 0:27:00.760
<v Speaker 3>fifty percent of the energy is coming from renewables, you

0:27:00.800 --> 0:27:03.879
<v Speaker 3>don't see that in you know, Arkansas and Indiana and

0:27:04.080 --> 0:27:07.639
<v Speaker 3>Pennsylvania and Alabama, and you know those kinds of places

0:27:07.640 --> 0:27:12.080
<v Speaker 3>where you see maybe a few percent coming from renewable energy.

0:27:12.440 --> 0:27:14.040
<v Speaker 2>So the ability and.

0:27:13.960 --> 0:27:17.800
<v Speaker 3>The areas for growth across the US are still, you know,

0:27:17.960 --> 0:27:21.199
<v Speaker 3>still pretty tremendous. I mean, you could see you know,

0:27:21.320 --> 0:27:25.960
<v Speaker 3>dramatic increases in those markets over the next couple of decades,

0:27:26.480 --> 0:27:28.560
<v Speaker 3>and it would take them a while to get up

0:27:28.560 --> 0:27:30.959
<v Speaker 3>to fifty percent supply from renewable energy.

0:27:31.200 --> 0:27:34.600
<v Speaker 1>So one thing that's worth noting in these twenty twenty

0:27:34.640 --> 0:27:38.520
<v Speaker 1>six record figures for solar installation is that seventy four

0:27:38.600 --> 0:27:41.240
<v Speaker 1>percent of all solar capacity that was installed in the

0:27:41.240 --> 0:27:47.160
<v Speaker 1>first quarter of twenty twenty six was in Texas, Florida, Ohio, Indiana, Michigan, Arizona,

0:27:47.200 --> 0:27:51.800
<v Speaker 1>and Mississippi, all that voted for Trump. These are the

0:27:51.800 --> 0:27:57.960
<v Speaker 1>places that are seemingly loving solar. Do you see that

0:27:58.359 --> 0:28:03.440
<v Speaker 1>kind of veg showing up at US politics in maybe

0:28:03.520 --> 0:28:07.280
<v Speaker 1>the midterms or the next presidential election, where this attack

0:28:07.359 --> 0:28:12.280
<v Speaker 1>on renewables turns into people wanting a leader that actually

0:28:12.359 --> 0:28:16.320
<v Speaker 1>brings renewables regardless of climate goals, but just because it's cheap.

0:28:17.280 --> 0:28:21.639
<v Speaker 3>It definitely should and it's not just what's critical is

0:28:21.640 --> 0:28:25.160
<v Speaker 3>It's not just we're building projects in those in those markets.

0:28:25.840 --> 0:28:28.920
<v Speaker 3>You know, the vast majority of the manufacturing jobs they've

0:28:28.920 --> 0:28:31.920
<v Speaker 3>been created over the last five years in the renewable

0:28:32.000 --> 0:28:34.960
<v Speaker 3>energy sector is in those same same states. I mean,

0:28:35.320 --> 0:28:40.680
<v Speaker 3>first soldiers, manufacturing facilities, you know, historically the Legacy facilities

0:28:40.680 --> 0:28:45.880
<v Speaker 3>in Ohio, they built new facilities in Alabama, Louisiana, South

0:28:46.200 --> 0:28:47.120
<v Speaker 3>South Carolina.

0:28:47.360 --> 0:28:52.800
<v Speaker 2>Okay, next power LG you know Q cells.

0:28:52.520 --> 0:28:55.880
<v Speaker 3>There's and there's just a long list of manufacturers that

0:28:55.920 --> 0:28:59.640
<v Speaker 3>are built manufacturing, tens of thousands of jobs, tens of

0:28:59.640 --> 0:29:04.040
<v Speaker 3>billions of dollars of investment in Red states. Okay, the

0:29:04.120 --> 0:29:07.960
<v Speaker 3>figure was more than eighty percent of all manufacturing for

0:29:07.960 --> 0:29:11.960
<v Speaker 3>renewable energy is in Red states. So I mean that

0:29:12.480 --> 0:29:15.600
<v Speaker 3>is not having as a big effect as you would think,

0:29:15.880 --> 0:29:17.640
<v Speaker 3>but it's starting to resonate.

0:29:18.360 --> 0:29:22.000
<v Speaker 1>One reason why the oil and gas industry seems to

0:29:22.040 --> 0:29:25.000
<v Speaker 1>get sway is because it has had for a long

0:29:25.040 --> 0:29:29.440
<v Speaker 1>time a very powerful lobby. The renewable energy industry is newer,

0:29:30.040 --> 0:29:33.440
<v Speaker 1>but it's also, as some people say, not as organized.

0:29:33.720 --> 0:29:37.520
<v Speaker 1>You're part of that industry, what are you doing to

0:29:37.600 --> 0:29:41.760
<v Speaker 1>try and improve your political chances in the elections to come.

0:29:41.880 --> 0:29:43.720
<v Speaker 2>We're participating in the industry groups.

0:29:43.760 --> 0:29:46.560
<v Speaker 3>I mean there's you know, the three main industries groups

0:29:46.600 --> 0:29:49.920
<v Speaker 3>that affect renewable energy and solar. You know, the Soul

0:29:50.040 --> 0:29:54.240
<v Speaker 3>Energy Industry Association, you know called CIA. There's ACP, which

0:29:54.280 --> 0:29:57.840
<v Speaker 3>is American Clean Power, and there's and there's a CORE

0:29:58.440 --> 0:30:02.800
<v Speaker 3>which is American Council Renewable Energy. Those three groups are

0:30:02.840 --> 0:30:07.240
<v Speaker 3>the three largest industry groups, and we are trying to

0:30:08.160 --> 0:30:13.320
<v Speaker 3>kind of mobilize from a lobbying activity and policy and

0:30:13.440 --> 0:30:15.800
<v Speaker 3>also trying to make sure that those three groups are

0:30:15.880 --> 0:30:16.640
<v Speaker 3>working together.

0:30:17.040 --> 0:30:19.120
<v Speaker 2>I'll say the main difference is, you.

0:30:19.040 --> 0:30:23.520
<v Speaker 3>Know, while you know, renewable energy is the most affordable

0:30:23.760 --> 0:30:27.760
<v Speaker 3>supply out there, it's also and as you mentioned, it's

0:30:27.800 --> 0:30:31.120
<v Speaker 3>a lower risk, low lower return. So you know, the

0:30:31.120 --> 0:30:34.400
<v Speaker 3>oil and gas industries have been have been thriving for

0:30:34.440 --> 0:30:37.960
<v Speaker 3>one hundred years. You know, you've got you know, record

0:30:38.000 --> 0:30:41.960
<v Speaker 3>profits during the current war in Iran and record profits

0:30:41.960 --> 0:30:46.720
<v Speaker 3>when the war in Ukraine broke out. That profitability is

0:30:46.840 --> 0:30:49.280
<v Speaker 3>a lot more muted in the renewable energy industry. So

0:30:49.880 --> 0:30:54.800
<v Speaker 3>the oil and gas industry, you know, outspends probably one

0:30:54.880 --> 0:30:58.240
<v Speaker 3>hundred to one the renewable energy industry and lobbying efforts,

0:30:58.960 --> 0:31:03.760
<v Speaker 3>and unfortunately, I think that's likely going to continue. I

0:31:03.760 --> 0:31:06.480
<v Speaker 3>think we've got the right message, we don't have the

0:31:06.560 --> 0:31:09.760
<v Speaker 3>right lobbying dollars behind it. We're trying to figure out

0:31:09.760 --> 0:31:14.440
<v Speaker 3>ways to increase the voice of renewable energy and get

0:31:14.440 --> 0:31:18.160
<v Speaker 3>that message out that this is the most affordable electricity

0:31:18.160 --> 0:31:22.080
<v Speaker 3>supply out there without having to spend the massive dollars

0:31:22.080 --> 0:31:24.680
<v Speaker 3>that the oil and gas industry does on lobbying and

0:31:24.720 --> 0:31:26.080
<v Speaker 3>policy activities in DC.

0:31:26.560 --> 0:31:31.840
<v Speaker 1>So, would you conclude that the narrative that the renewables

0:31:31.880 --> 0:31:35.280
<v Speaker 1>industry's future in the US is dire is not true?

0:31:35.400 --> 0:31:39.920
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely not, absolutely not. I've made a conscious choice. Okay.

0:31:40.200 --> 0:31:42.040
<v Speaker 2>You know, I was in the nuclear industry.

0:31:42.280 --> 0:31:44.719
<v Speaker 3>I spent a good portion of my career, you know,

0:31:44.880 --> 0:31:48.080
<v Speaker 3>upwards to twenty years developing natural gas projects, both in

0:31:48.120 --> 0:31:49.440
<v Speaker 3>the US and internationally.

0:31:49.840 --> 0:31:53.400
<v Speaker 2>My view is this is going to be a solar world. Okay,

0:31:53.440 --> 0:31:54.640
<v Speaker 2>it's just a question of when.

0:31:55.720 --> 0:32:03.320
<v Speaker 1>Thank you, Kevin, Thank you very much, and thank you

0:32:03.400 --> 0:32:09.200
<v Speaker 1>for listening to zero. Now for the sound of the week.

0:32:21.920 --> 0:32:24.360
<v Speaker 1>That is the sound of a steam engine recorded by

0:32:24.440 --> 0:32:27.040
<v Speaker 1>Robert Ditzig. If you liked this episode, please take a

0:32:27.040 --> 0:32:29.720
<v Speaker 1>moment to rate and review the show on Apple Podcasts, Spotify,

0:32:29.920 --> 0:32:33.560
<v Speaker 1>and YouTube. This episode was produced by Oscar boyd Our

0:32:33.600 --> 0:32:36.680
<v Speaker 1>theme music is composed by Wonderly Special Thanks to Mark

0:32:36.760 --> 0:32:42.160
<v Speaker 1>cheddiak Soamersadi, Laura Milan and Sharon chan i'm Akshadrati Back soon.