WEBVTT - Surveillance: U.S. Jobs Report With Sec. Walsh

0:00:05.120 --> 0:00:09.200
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. I'm Tom Keene along

0:00:09.240 --> 0:00:12.719
<v Speaker 1>with Jonathan Ferroll and Lisa Brown Witz Jay Leye. We

0:00:12.880 --> 0:00:16.800
<v Speaker 1>bring you insight from the best and economics, finance, investment,

0:00:17.079 --> 0:00:22.440
<v Speaker 1>and international relations. Find Bloomberg Surveillance and Apple Podcast, Suncloud,

0:00:22.840 --> 0:00:30.760
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg dot com and of course on the Bloomberg terminal. Secondly, Wolves,

0:00:30.800 --> 0:00:33.120
<v Speaker 1>joining us now on the labor market report we got

0:00:33.120 --> 0:00:36.200
<v Speaker 1>a little bit earlier this morning, Dan in Washington, d C. Secondly,

0:00:36.240 --> 0:00:37.919
<v Speaker 1>what is great to have you with us on the program, Sir.

0:00:38.159 --> 0:00:40.160
<v Speaker 1>I just wanted to start right here with the wage story.

0:00:40.360 --> 0:00:41.920
<v Speaker 1>We heard from the President of United States in the

0:00:42.000 --> 0:00:44.320
<v Speaker 1>past week on this just listening with me about what

0:00:44.320 --> 0:00:47.440
<v Speaker 1>he had to say. Take a listen. The wages have

0:00:47.560 --> 0:00:51.519
<v Speaker 1>gone up higher faster than inflation. Uh, and we have

0:00:51.720 --> 0:00:56.040
<v Speaker 1>generated real economic growth. It doesn't mean these dislocations aren't real.

0:00:56.560 --> 0:01:00.320
<v Speaker 1>They do affect people's lives. Secondly, Wolf, she said, wages

0:01:00.360 --> 0:01:03.640
<v Speaker 1>have gone up higher faster than inflation. What data is

0:01:03.680 --> 0:01:06.679
<v Speaker 1>the president looking at? Sir No, I think I think

0:01:06.720 --> 0:01:08.320
<v Speaker 1>what the president one that was really talking about is

0:01:08.360 --> 0:01:11.720
<v Speaker 1>inflation is reflecting our economy reviving, uh, and was seeing

0:01:11.720 --> 0:01:15.160
<v Speaker 1>this a worldwide issue. I mean, certainly, Uh, we've seen

0:01:15.200 --> 0:01:18.120
<v Speaker 1>over the last couple of months, wages increasing. We've seen

0:01:18.160 --> 0:01:20.720
<v Speaker 1>that that number catching up to inflation. Not quite there yet,

0:01:21.080 --> 0:01:23.319
<v Speaker 1>but it's heading towards that number. Again, I can't predict

0:01:23.360 --> 0:01:25.280
<v Speaker 1>what's going to happen over the course of the next

0:01:25.280 --> 0:01:28.120
<v Speaker 1>six eight months, but there's obviously a hope. All I

0:01:28.120 --> 0:01:30.319
<v Speaker 1>can say is that the President laid out a plan

0:01:30.440 --> 0:01:33.640
<v Speaker 1>in January for an economic recovery. UH. Since that time,

0:01:33.680 --> 0:01:35.920
<v Speaker 1>five point six million people have gone back to the workforce.

0:01:36.360 --> 0:01:38.880
<v Speaker 1>This month's report, there's a lot of positives in it

0:01:38.880 --> 0:01:42.000
<v Speaker 1>because it's it's a diversified group of businesses that have

0:01:42.040 --> 0:01:45.240
<v Speaker 1>seen increases in their in their job market, in manufacturing

0:01:45.240 --> 0:01:48.080
<v Speaker 1>and business related issues. Uh, in a whole bunch of

0:01:48.080 --> 0:01:51.080
<v Speaker 1>different sectors, in healthcare, it's not just in hospitality. So

0:01:51.400 --> 0:01:53.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, I still think that that we're moving forward.

0:01:53.120 --> 0:01:55.240
<v Speaker 1>I didn't hear the president's whole speech there, so I'm

0:01:55.240 --> 0:01:57.880
<v Speaker 1>assuming there was some context before and after what he said. Well,

0:01:57.920 --> 0:02:00.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't think the context is already benefit when you

0:02:00.240 --> 0:02:01.840
<v Speaker 1>have the statement there for all to hear, for all

0:02:01.880 --> 0:02:04.160
<v Speaker 1>to see, we listen to the whole news conference ourselves.

0:02:04.160 --> 0:02:06.920
<v Speaker 1>He said in his words, the wages are growing faster

0:02:06.960 --> 0:02:08.920
<v Speaker 1>than inflation, and so I don't see that in the data.

0:02:09.160 --> 0:02:11.040
<v Speaker 1>IF had some uncomfortable moments in the past with the

0:02:11.080 --> 0:02:14.600
<v Speaker 1>previous administration when they used to say things that weren't accurate.

0:02:14.880 --> 0:02:17.919
<v Speaker 1>It's not accurate to say, is it, Secretary Walsh, that

0:02:18.040 --> 0:02:21.720
<v Speaker 1>wages are rising faster than inflation in America right now? Well,

0:02:21.720 --> 0:02:23.200
<v Speaker 1>certainly in the in the last couple of months. And

0:02:23.440 --> 0:02:25.359
<v Speaker 1>I asked that question this morning when I when I

0:02:25.440 --> 0:02:28.080
<v Speaker 1>sat down with our economous team and I was asked

0:02:28.120 --> 0:02:31.360
<v Speaker 1>him about wages growth and inflation. And clearly, in the

0:02:31.360 --> 0:02:33.840
<v Speaker 1>first part of this year we saw some wages some

0:02:33.919 --> 0:02:36.959
<v Speaker 1>inflation going higher than wage growth. In the last couple

0:02:37.000 --> 0:02:39.560
<v Speaker 1>of months, we've seen some of that changing. So hopefully

0:02:39.560 --> 0:02:43.600
<v Speaker 1>that train continues. Let's sorry, I don't know if that's

0:02:43.600 --> 0:02:46.880
<v Speaker 1>what the President was referring to. The president's statement is

0:02:46.880 --> 0:02:49.040
<v Speaker 1>the president's statement, it's not backed up by the dates.

0:02:49.040 --> 0:02:51.160
<v Speaker 1>From my screen, I've got inflation with a five handle

0:02:51.480 --> 0:02:54.480
<v Speaker 1>and wage growth year over year, I've got growth of

0:02:54.600 --> 0:02:57.440
<v Speaker 1>four point nine percent. Secretly, well, so I want to

0:02:57.440 --> 0:03:00.520
<v Speaker 1>talk about the vaccine mandate as well. You've put that

0:03:00.520 --> 0:03:03.400
<v Speaker 1>out there in a US today place earlier this week.

0:03:03.760 --> 0:03:06.840
<v Speaker 1>The participation right is not recovering in America. I want

0:03:06.840 --> 0:03:08.480
<v Speaker 1>I want to stand from your perspective, how you think

0:03:08.520 --> 0:03:13.639
<v Speaker 1>that mandate is going to win pack potentially vantakes a point. Well,

0:03:13.639 --> 0:03:15.880
<v Speaker 1>this report today shows that about three point eight million

0:03:15.960 --> 0:03:19.000
<v Speaker 1>Americans and directly not coming back to work because of

0:03:19.000 --> 0:03:21.840
<v Speaker 1>the pandemic. That's that's the reason for not coming back. Uh.

0:03:22.000 --> 0:03:24.600
<v Speaker 1>And what we put out yesterday in the Emerging Temporary

0:03:24.600 --> 0:03:27.760
<v Speaker 1>Standard wasn't a mandate. It was a companies over a

0:03:27.840 --> 0:03:32.240
<v Speaker 1>hundred people either testing, exsuming vaccine or testing. And that's

0:03:32.320 --> 0:03:34.600
<v Speaker 1>there's an option here, and that's what we're pushing for

0:03:34.720 --> 0:03:37.680
<v Speaker 1>here hopefully to see uh. And hopefully when when this

0:03:37.720 --> 0:03:39.960
<v Speaker 1>gets put into effect and it goes into full effect

0:03:40.000 --> 0:03:42.640
<v Speaker 1>by January, we will start to see hopefully some of

0:03:42.640 --> 0:03:45.000
<v Speaker 1>those three point eight million people who right now are

0:03:45.000 --> 0:03:46.520
<v Speaker 1>saying they're not coming back because of it, because of

0:03:46.520 --> 0:03:48.720
<v Speaker 1>the pandemic, will start to see those folks feel safe

0:03:48.800 --> 0:03:51.280
<v Speaker 1>enough to come back into the workplace. So it's a

0:03:51.320 --> 0:03:54.400
<v Speaker 1>it's a it's a it's a vaccine. If you don't

0:03:54.400 --> 0:03:56.800
<v Speaker 1>get vaccinated, you get tested, and then in the workplace

0:03:56.920 --> 0:03:59.200
<v Speaker 1>you have to wear a mask. Uh, and in your

0:03:59.240 --> 0:04:01.280
<v Speaker 1>own area, it's at the mascot. But it is about

0:04:01.280 --> 0:04:03.520
<v Speaker 1>protecting the health and safety of workers. I'll avoid the

0:04:03.560 --> 0:04:05.360
<v Speaker 1>semantics and I want to focus on a Goldmen Sax

0:04:05.400 --> 0:04:09.840
<v Speaker 1>piece you referenced in the US Today USA Today piece. Secondly, Welsh,

0:04:09.960 --> 0:04:12.000
<v Speaker 1>when you reference Goldmen Snax, can you want me through

0:04:12.040 --> 0:04:14.240
<v Speaker 1>the conclusion of that piece that you referenced in that

0:04:14.240 --> 0:04:16.880
<v Speaker 1>outped pace early this week, can you say that one

0:04:16.880 --> 0:04:19.240
<v Speaker 1>more time? I'm sorry you referenced the Goldman Sax piece

0:04:19.240 --> 0:04:21.599
<v Speaker 1>of research on what would happen with some of the

0:04:21.600 --> 0:04:23.840
<v Speaker 1>policies if they were introduced for labor supply. Can you

0:04:23.880 --> 0:04:26.800
<v Speaker 1>want me through the conclusion of that piece. Well, what

0:04:26.839 --> 0:04:29.040
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing. What we're seeing as companies that have put

0:04:29.080 --> 0:04:32.359
<v Speaker 1>put in place vaccine mandates and this isn't the minute,

0:04:32.360 --> 0:04:35.479
<v Speaker 1>but they put him in We've seen eight participation rate

0:04:35.520 --> 0:04:37.760
<v Speaker 1>of people getting vaccinated, and we're seeing people go back

0:04:37.800 --> 0:04:39.840
<v Speaker 1>to work. I mean, it's happened all across this country

0:04:40.000 --> 0:04:42.400
<v Speaker 1>in those cases. And again, this is about making sure

0:04:42.440 --> 0:04:44.640
<v Speaker 1>that we wanted to do and what that BED was

0:04:44.680 --> 0:04:46.920
<v Speaker 1>all about was really trying to explain to people that

0:04:46.960 --> 0:04:50.320
<v Speaker 1>we want to create safe working environments so people feel

0:04:50.320 --> 0:04:52.640
<v Speaker 1>safe about going back in Uh. You know, I would

0:04:52.720 --> 0:04:54.760
<v Speaker 1>rather be talking about something else today and in in

0:04:54.800 --> 0:04:57.640
<v Speaker 1>this period of time in history. But unfortunately, you know,

0:04:57.680 --> 0:05:00.360
<v Speaker 1>we're still living in the midst of a pand American

0:05:00.440 --> 0:05:02.680
<v Speaker 1>and I think that we can't overlook the fact that

0:05:02.720 --> 0:05:04.560
<v Speaker 1>people are afraid to go back to work. That's one

0:05:04.560 --> 0:05:06.960
<v Speaker 1>of the reasons. There's other reasons, childcare and other reasons.

0:05:06.960 --> 0:05:09.320
<v Speaker 1>But I think today's report is positive and we just

0:05:09.320 --> 0:05:10.960
<v Speaker 1>have to continue to build up the momentum, AMK of

0:05:11.000 --> 0:05:13.200
<v Speaker 1>this report. I want to read out the conclusion of

0:05:13.200 --> 0:05:15.280
<v Speaker 1>that government SAX piece that you referenced in this piece

0:05:15.279 --> 0:05:18.159
<v Speaker 1>earlier this week, the research from Nhatsas and his team.

0:05:18.200 --> 0:05:21.520
<v Speaker 1>Here's the conclusion. We are therefore not adjusting our employment forecast,

0:05:21.600 --> 0:05:23.600
<v Speaker 1>but we see some downside risk to employment at the

0:05:23.680 --> 0:05:26.280
<v Speaker 1>end of twenty one an upside risk by the end

0:05:26.279 --> 0:05:28.400
<v Speaker 1>of twenty two as a result of the mandate. Now,

0:05:28.400 --> 0:05:31.000
<v Speaker 1>I want to understand from your perspective, sept to be Welsh,

0:05:31.000 --> 0:05:33.720
<v Speaker 1>do you accept that that as you introduce these policies

0:05:33.760 --> 0:05:35.640
<v Speaker 1>for supply in the labor market, there is some near

0:05:35.720 --> 0:05:38.960
<v Speaker 1>term downside risk, but ultimately potentially further down the road

0:05:39.240 --> 0:05:42.360
<v Speaker 1>some upside potential. And I don't think this is any

0:05:42.440 --> 0:05:44.520
<v Speaker 1>upside risk. I mean I think that this is this

0:05:44.600 --> 0:05:47.720
<v Speaker 1>is clearly all a positive that we're doing here. I mean,

0:05:47.760 --> 0:05:50.039
<v Speaker 1>what we're doing is we're asking companies with a hundred

0:05:50.080 --> 0:05:53.200
<v Speaker 1>and more people to have their employees vaccinated or if

0:05:53.200 --> 0:05:55.960
<v Speaker 1>they're not vaccinated tested, uh. And I think that we

0:05:55.960 --> 0:05:58.760
<v Speaker 1>we can't forget that a year ago this time, we

0:05:58.839 --> 0:06:01.440
<v Speaker 1>had people dying in this country at high numbers. We

0:06:01.480 --> 0:06:04.360
<v Speaker 1>had high infection rate and high numbers. Since this pandemic began,

0:06:04.400 --> 0:06:08.559
<v Speaker 1>seven and fifty thousand Americans have died. Five million people

0:06:08.560 --> 0:06:10.880
<v Speaker 1>in this in this world have died because of a pandemic.

0:06:11.080 --> 0:06:12.719
<v Speaker 1>And I think that you know, by by by putting

0:06:12.720 --> 0:06:15.679
<v Speaker 1>an emergency temporary standard in place, isn't going to impact

0:06:15.760 --> 0:06:18.400
<v Speaker 1>our economy negative manner. If anything's gonna have a very

0:06:18.400 --> 0:06:20.080
<v Speaker 1>positive impact on it. It's so just to be clear,

0:06:20.080 --> 0:06:21.839
<v Speaker 1>are we cherry picking the bits we like of the

0:06:21.839 --> 0:06:24.440
<v Speaker 1>government Saxon research and not the conclusion I just want

0:06:24.440 --> 0:06:27.359
<v Speaker 1>to finish that, Secretary Wolf, is that what we're doing here? No,

0:06:27.360 --> 0:06:29.480
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't necessarily cherry picking anything. I think I'm just

0:06:29.480 --> 0:06:32.120
<v Speaker 1>stating a fact about about I think people are cherry

0:06:32.160 --> 0:06:34.279
<v Speaker 1>picking what we did with the t S and I

0:06:34.279 --> 0:06:35.720
<v Speaker 1>don't think that we have to look at the whole

0:06:35.720 --> 0:06:37.840
<v Speaker 1>plan here. It's just like me coming on here today

0:06:37.920 --> 0:06:40.799
<v Speaker 1>and talking about five one thousand jobs is a good report.

0:06:40.880 --> 0:06:42.560
<v Speaker 1>Last month I was on it was a hundred three

0:06:42.560 --> 0:06:44.760
<v Speaker 1>thousand report. If I only focus on the good reports

0:06:44.760 --> 0:06:46.880
<v Speaker 1>and didn't focus on the bad reports, that's cherry picking.

0:06:46.880 --> 0:06:49.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't cherry pick. I come straight at it. Hopefully

0:06:49.200 --> 0:06:50.800
<v Speaker 1>we get more of the same. Thank you for joining

0:06:50.839 --> 0:06:53.680
<v Speaker 1>us today. Secondly, wolfh, thank you the Labor Secretary. Thank you,

0:06:53.720 --> 0:07:01.920
<v Speaker 1>sir as always creed positive w C I of nine

0:07:01.960 --> 0:07:04.960
<v Speaker 1>cents if one PC on w C, I tell Brent

0:07:07.080 --> 0:07:10.040
<v Speaker 1>w C, I ya today up six. Well you got

0:07:10.120 --> 0:07:12.760
<v Speaker 1>a one dollar thirty cent delta between West Texas and

0:07:12.840 --> 0:07:15.040
<v Speaker 1>media Brent crude. And this is an oil you know,

0:07:15.120 --> 0:07:17.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna use a word from Generations Ago, John, it's

0:07:17.480 --> 0:07:20.040
<v Speaker 1>an oil market boxed up where there's a lot of

0:07:20.080 --> 0:07:23.920
<v Speaker 1>mystery out there, different meaning up in the UK. Maybe, well,

0:07:23.960 --> 0:07:26.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, we'll just comment on that now he canry

0:07:26.400 --> 0:07:28.080
<v Speaker 1>on to see. What we're gonna do right now is

0:07:28.120 --> 0:07:31.240
<v Speaker 1>speak to the general Lady from from the state of Michigan.

0:07:31.320 --> 0:07:34.080
<v Speaker 1>She is the Energy Secretary of the United States and

0:07:34.120 --> 0:07:37.480
<v Speaker 1>has been enjoying the fair climbs of Glasgow, England. I

0:07:37.560 --> 0:07:41.120
<v Speaker 1>always say, Governor Grant Homes, Secretary Grand Home, welcome to Bloomberg.

0:07:41.120 --> 0:07:44.000
<v Speaker 1>We're thrilled to speak with you this morning. Let me

0:07:44.080 --> 0:07:47.680
<v Speaker 1>cut to it if I may, and Sturgis, Michigan. It

0:07:47.800 --> 0:07:51.320
<v Speaker 1>is two dollars eighty nine cents a gallon. I guess

0:07:51.440 --> 0:07:55.000
<v Speaker 1>that's better than in California. What is the grand Home

0:07:55.240 --> 0:08:03.160
<v Speaker 1>plan to increase oil production in America? Oh? That is hilarious.

0:08:03.360 --> 0:08:06.040
<v Speaker 1>Would that I had the magic wand on this. As

0:08:06.080 --> 0:08:10.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, of course, oil is a global market. It

0:08:10.120 --> 0:08:13.840
<v Speaker 1>is controlled by a cartel. That cartel is called OPEC,

0:08:14.080 --> 0:08:16.680
<v Speaker 1>and they made a decision yesterday that they were not

0:08:16.800 --> 0:08:19.960
<v Speaker 1>going to increase beyond what they were already planning. So

0:08:20.480 --> 0:08:23.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, the interesting thing is, you know, the Department

0:08:23.680 --> 0:08:27.760
<v Speaker 1>of Energy has an Energy Information Agency, and that agency

0:08:27.800 --> 0:08:31.280
<v Speaker 1>does the forecasting of what oil and gas prices are

0:08:31.320 --> 0:08:35.000
<v Speaker 1>going to be as of As of right now, their

0:08:35.120 --> 0:08:38.960
<v Speaker 1>forecast for the beginning of December is that on average

0:08:39.120 --> 0:08:42.600
<v Speaker 1>gas prices, gasoline prices will be about three dollars and

0:08:42.720 --> 0:08:45.400
<v Speaker 1>five cents at the beginning of December. They will do

0:08:45.480 --> 0:08:48.200
<v Speaker 1>an adjustment to that forecast in the next week or so,

0:08:48.200 --> 0:08:51.520
<v Speaker 1>so we'll see if that holds. But clearly the Biden

0:08:51.520 --> 0:08:54.240
<v Speaker 1>administration is very concerned about the price at the pump

0:08:54.320 --> 0:08:57.720
<v Speaker 1>and certainly the price in people's wallets for natural gas

0:08:57.760 --> 0:09:00.839
<v Speaker 1>as well for this winter, including I would say propane

0:09:00.880 --> 0:09:03.600
<v Speaker 1>and heating oil, particularly in the northeast. What is the

0:09:03.720 --> 0:09:07.400
<v Speaker 1>American solution If they're the bad guys, Russian and OPEC

0:09:07.480 --> 0:09:09.760
<v Speaker 1>at the global price of the market, we all understand

0:09:09.800 --> 0:09:14.160
<v Speaker 1>the economics. What is the Biden plan to jump start

0:09:14.400 --> 0:09:21.920
<v Speaker 1>energy production across America? Well, here's the Biden plan. I'm

0:09:21.960 --> 0:09:24.400
<v Speaker 1>here at Glasgow. The Biden plan is to diversify and

0:09:24.480 --> 0:09:26.760
<v Speaker 1>to make sure that we move in a direction of

0:09:26.800 --> 0:09:29.960
<v Speaker 1>clean energy where we're not reliant upon cartels and we're

0:09:29.960 --> 0:09:34.240
<v Speaker 1>not reliant upon geopolitical adversaries who may be um creating

0:09:34.280 --> 0:09:37.200
<v Speaker 1>choke points for our ability and our people to be

0:09:37.240 --> 0:09:40.040
<v Speaker 1>able to access energy. So that's obviously a longer term

0:09:40.320 --> 0:09:42.320
<v Speaker 1>strategy and we will continue. This is why this is

0:09:42.320 --> 0:09:46.160
<v Speaker 1>called a transition. But if a d plus dollars a

0:09:46.240 --> 0:09:50.200
<v Speaker 1>barrel doesn't incentivize oil companies to get off the sidelines.

0:09:50.240 --> 0:09:51.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure what well. For those of you on

0:09:51.840 --> 0:09:53.840
<v Speaker 1>radio today and John Ferroll, I must note that the

0:09:53.880 --> 0:09:57.840
<v Speaker 1>former governor of Michigan is wearing East Lansing green today.

0:09:58.080 --> 0:10:01.960
<v Speaker 1>That's what the color re And are we on opaque? Plus?

0:10:02.000 --> 0:10:04.400
<v Speaker 1>I do wonder and I don't think it's funny. Said

0:10:04.400 --> 0:10:06.520
<v Speaker 1>an imagine had this to say early this week. Let's

0:10:06.520 --> 0:10:09.360
<v Speaker 1>take a listen. I say that we can basically do

0:10:09.440 --> 0:10:11.680
<v Speaker 1>more for ourselves. We've been energy independent for the first

0:10:11.720 --> 0:10:14.680
<v Speaker 1>time in sixty seven years. Why can't we do more?

0:10:14.880 --> 0:10:18.160
<v Speaker 1>Why can't we produce more? We've got plenty of natural gas.

0:10:18.240 --> 0:10:20.800
<v Speaker 1>My state, beautiful Stata West Virginia, has an ocean of

0:10:20.880 --> 0:10:23.440
<v Speaker 1>natural gas under it. If they just let us build

0:10:23.440 --> 0:10:26.120
<v Speaker 1>a pipeline, we can get the product to market. And

0:10:26.160 --> 0:10:28.240
<v Speaker 1>why don't we do more drilling? And why don't we

0:10:28.280 --> 0:10:31.240
<v Speaker 1>do more basically production in the United States. I'm not

0:10:31.280 --> 0:10:34.719
<v Speaker 1>depending on OPEC. I'm not depending on other countries for

0:10:34.840 --> 0:10:36.880
<v Speaker 1>my energy anymore. We know how to do it, we

0:10:36.960 --> 0:10:40.800
<v Speaker 1>have the technology. We should be relying on ourselves. The

0:10:40.920 --> 0:10:45.559
<v Speaker 1>words of the Senator, the Democrat, Mr. Mansion, that these

0:10:45.640 --> 0:10:49.120
<v Speaker 1>as the words of the Pioneer CEO. Madam Secretary, let's

0:10:49.120 --> 0:10:51.280
<v Speaker 1>pick up with the words of the Pioneer CEO. The

0:10:51.280 --> 0:10:54.040
<v Speaker 1>president's efforts to restrict drilling on federal land and offshore

0:10:54.320 --> 0:10:57.079
<v Speaker 1>have been stunning. To backfast some his quote, he's got

0:10:57.080 --> 0:10:59.760
<v Speaker 1>to back off his rhetoric on federal leases going forward.

0:11:00.559 --> 0:11:03.240
<v Speaker 1>Do you think it's true that we are reliant on

0:11:03.320 --> 0:11:10.040
<v Speaker 1>opeque plus in the United States of America. We are

0:11:10.040 --> 0:11:13.680
<v Speaker 1>reliant on a global gas market. I mean the global

0:11:13.720 --> 0:11:17.840
<v Speaker 1>gas market. We can't just produce oil for the United States.

0:11:17.880 --> 0:11:20.400
<v Speaker 1>It is on a global market. And let me just

0:11:20.440 --> 0:11:23.720
<v Speaker 1>say the President has not banned oil and gas leases.

0:11:24.000 --> 0:11:29.440
<v Speaker 1>There are twenty three million acres of public lands that

0:11:29.480 --> 0:11:33.400
<v Speaker 1>includes offshore and onshore where there are leases that have

0:11:33.640 --> 0:11:36.040
<v Speaker 1>that are not being used right now by oil and

0:11:36.040 --> 0:11:40.400
<v Speaker 1>gas companies. Over seven thousand leases have been issued and

0:11:40.440 --> 0:11:42.720
<v Speaker 1>the oil and gas companies are not using them. They're

0:11:42.720 --> 0:11:45.520
<v Speaker 1>sitting on them, their stockpiling these leases. Why is that

0:11:45.880 --> 0:11:49.840
<v Speaker 1>so we need? You know, if the production issue is

0:11:49.840 --> 0:11:52.080
<v Speaker 1>not at the foot of the president, there is not

0:11:52.200 --> 0:11:55.320
<v Speaker 1>a band on oil and gas leases unfederal lands. Amount

0:11:55.320 --> 0:11:57.360
<v Speaker 1>of Secretary, you know, I'm careful with my words. I

0:11:57.400 --> 0:12:00.880
<v Speaker 1>didn't sight band I said restrict And in addition to that,

0:12:01.200 --> 0:12:03.840
<v Speaker 1>you're talking about why they won't invest. We know why

0:12:03.840 --> 0:12:07.360
<v Speaker 1>they won't invest. They won't invest because this administration is

0:12:07.400 --> 0:12:10.720
<v Speaker 1>speaking so highly of this big energy transition that you're

0:12:10.760 --> 0:12:14.520
<v Speaker 1>actively supporting. So I think it's misleading to say that

0:12:14.600 --> 0:12:17.600
<v Speaker 1>we are in the United States America increasingly dependent on

0:12:17.640 --> 0:12:20.080
<v Speaker 1>opaque plus when we've seen all production in this country

0:12:20.080 --> 0:12:22.800
<v Speaker 1>increase over than last several decades. Now, there are some

0:12:22.840 --> 0:12:25.680
<v Speaker 1>options out there for you, as you know, with the SPR,

0:12:26.000 --> 0:12:28.080
<v Speaker 1>with the options on the table, to address the situation

0:12:28.120 --> 0:12:30.439
<v Speaker 1>we're in. At the moment, the United States of America

0:12:30.880 --> 0:12:33.000
<v Speaker 1>is in control of its own destiny here. I do

0:12:33.080 --> 0:12:35.160
<v Speaker 1>wonder if the SPR is an option for you to

0:12:35.160 --> 0:12:40.480
<v Speaker 1>address what's happening in the commodity market. The SPR is

0:12:40.520 --> 0:12:43.319
<v Speaker 1>certainly on the table as an option, and the President

0:12:43.360 --> 0:12:45.520
<v Speaker 1>will have more to say about that. But let us

0:12:45.600 --> 0:12:46.920
<v Speaker 1>be clear. I mean, just to go back to your

0:12:46.960 --> 0:12:50.280
<v Speaker 1>other point, I mean these the oil and gas companies

0:12:50.559 --> 0:12:55.400
<v Speaker 1>have leases that there is no slow down, There is

0:12:55.440 --> 0:12:59.280
<v Speaker 1>no whatever the words were that you use, there's no restriction,

0:12:59.760 --> 0:13:03.720
<v Speaker 1>no ever on their ability to use those leases, over

0:13:03.880 --> 0:13:07.000
<v Speaker 1>seven thousand of them on public lands. Right now, So

0:13:07.040 --> 0:13:08.880
<v Speaker 1>I just don't want to let that stand. It is

0:13:08.920 --> 0:13:11.960
<v Speaker 1>not the President's doing that is causing the oil and

0:13:12.040 --> 0:13:15.040
<v Speaker 1>gas companies right now to decide to slow down. Actually

0:13:15.080 --> 0:13:17.400
<v Speaker 1>they were slowed down because of COVID, and we're seeing

0:13:17.520 --> 0:13:21.000
<v Speaker 1>some movement of oil rigs getting back online. But it's

0:13:21.040 --> 0:13:24.120
<v Speaker 1>it is curious about why they are not incentivized more

0:13:24.240 --> 0:13:26.960
<v Speaker 1>at eighty dollars a barrel. Let me just say, and

0:13:27.000 --> 0:13:30.320
<v Speaker 1>you're right about us moving to clean energy. That is

0:13:30.360 --> 0:13:32.840
<v Speaker 1>the future, and that is the long term strategy, and

0:13:32.840 --> 0:13:35.160
<v Speaker 1>we must do that so that we're not reliant upon

0:13:35.559 --> 0:13:38.440
<v Speaker 1>fuels that pollute the air that we see that are

0:13:38.440 --> 0:13:41.480
<v Speaker 1>accelerating climate change. To that point, Secretary Grant Home, some

0:13:41.480 --> 0:13:44.000
<v Speaker 1>people say that the best cure to get to a

0:13:44.080 --> 0:13:47.480
<v Speaker 1>greener future faster is to allow gas prices to go higher.

0:13:47.720 --> 0:13:50.840
<v Speaker 1>They are much higher in places like United Kingdom. Why

0:13:51.040 --> 0:13:53.680
<v Speaker 1>isn't there a school of thoughts saying this is just fine.

0:13:53.720 --> 0:13:57.000
<v Speaker 1>Perhaps people will reduce their reliance on fossil fuels and

0:13:57.040 --> 0:14:04.200
<v Speaker 1>diversify more quickly because real people use fossil fuels, and

0:14:04.280 --> 0:14:09.360
<v Speaker 1>real people's wallets, uh livelihoods are at stake. The President

0:14:09.400 --> 0:14:12.360
<v Speaker 1>does not want to see the price of fuel hurt

0:14:12.720 --> 0:14:16.480
<v Speaker 1>and pinch real people. Poor communities have about third up

0:14:16.520 --> 0:14:20.600
<v Speaker 1>to thirty of their monthly income is based upon fuels.

0:14:21.000 --> 0:14:23.200
<v Speaker 1>It's not right to raise the price of fuels. That

0:14:23.200 --> 0:14:25.320
<v Speaker 1>would actually hurt real people. That is not in the

0:14:25.320 --> 0:14:27.320
<v Speaker 1>President's plan, and he doesn't want to see that amount

0:14:27.320 --> 0:14:29.400
<v Speaker 1>of sextuary. When can we expect a decision with the

0:14:29.560 --> 0:14:34.920
<v Speaker 1>spr Is that something you're thinking about imminently? Um. I

0:14:34.960 --> 0:14:36.800
<v Speaker 1>know that the President is looking at it and he'll

0:14:36.840 --> 0:14:38.920
<v Speaker 1>have more to say about it. Okay, thank you very

0:14:38.960 --> 0:14:41.520
<v Speaker 1>much for joining us this morning. Monam. Secretary Jennifer Granhume

0:14:41.840 --> 0:14:51.120
<v Speaker 1>on this oil market, the importance of this. Pharmaceutical companies

0:14:51.160 --> 0:14:54.760
<v Speaker 1>are coming up with a pill of various means and

0:14:54.920 --> 0:14:58.480
<v Speaker 1>types and styles, and in the case of Merk, they're

0:14:58.520 --> 0:15:02.160
<v Speaker 1>allowing it to go genera immediately. That is the urgency

0:15:02.240 --> 0:15:06.160
<v Speaker 1>here on COVID nineteen. And of course the news today

0:15:06.200 --> 0:15:11.280
<v Speaker 1>and the key numbers Feiser with a pill that they

0:15:11.320 --> 0:15:16.600
<v Speaker 1>say has efficacy in a clinical trial. To translate. Andrew

0:15:16.600 --> 0:15:23.080
<v Speaker 1>Pekos of jenn Hopkins University, Andrew, is this pill like aspirin? Well,

0:15:23.080 --> 0:15:25.720
<v Speaker 1>it's a lot better than aspirin. It seems to be

0:15:25.800 --> 0:15:30.920
<v Speaker 1>incredibly effective at reducing that disease severity linked with covid

0:15:31.280 --> 0:15:35.040
<v Speaker 1>UH infection. And the population they tested had to have

0:15:35.120 --> 0:15:39.160
<v Speaker 1>at least one pre existing condition that pre exposed them

0:15:39.640 --> 0:15:43.560
<v Speaker 1>to severe covid so they were targeting a population that

0:15:43.640 --> 0:15:46.520
<v Speaker 1>was more likely to have severe disease and it worked

0:15:46.600 --> 0:15:50.560
<v Speaker 1>that amazing percentages in that population. What's the chemistry? Is

0:15:50.600 --> 0:15:53.400
<v Speaker 1>it m R n A in a pill form like

0:15:53.480 --> 0:15:55.960
<v Speaker 1>in the syringe that hurt me so much? I mean,

0:15:56.000 --> 0:15:58.800
<v Speaker 1>is it the same medicine. No, it's a it's a

0:15:58.960 --> 0:16:03.360
<v Speaker 1>very very different approach. This drug targets um, one of

0:16:03.400 --> 0:16:06.560
<v Speaker 1>the enzymes of the virus that the virus needs to

0:16:06.680 --> 0:16:10.760
<v Speaker 1>make its proteins replicate its genome, you know, so, so

0:16:11.040 --> 0:16:15.400
<v Speaker 1>it targets replicating virus and it really does stop that

0:16:15.480 --> 0:16:19.400
<v Speaker 1>virus from replicating relatively quickly. And because we're talking about chemistry,

0:16:19.440 --> 0:16:22.480
<v Speaker 1>will turn it over to well, that's a I was

0:16:22.480 --> 0:16:25.120
<v Speaker 1>going to talk about the efficacy of this chemistry because

0:16:25.120 --> 0:16:28.640
<v Speaker 1>we talked about efficacy rates of when we first started

0:16:28.680 --> 0:16:31.680
<v Speaker 1>talking about the vaccines, the MR and A vaccines. Is

0:16:31.680 --> 0:16:34.960
<v Speaker 1>this going to be a similar story we're talking now,

0:16:35.280 --> 0:16:38.560
<v Speaker 1>But there's asterisk asterisk and we might see a less

0:16:38.680 --> 0:16:43.040
<v Speaker 1>rosy future for such for such remedies. Well, here, here's

0:16:43.080 --> 0:16:46.480
<v Speaker 1>the big problem with antiviral treatments is they have to

0:16:46.520 --> 0:16:49.880
<v Speaker 1>be given early after symptom onset. And in this study,

0:16:50.000 --> 0:16:53.440
<v Speaker 1>everybody got the drug within five days of symptoms, and

0:16:53.520 --> 0:16:56.040
<v Speaker 1>there were even better results if you if you started

0:16:56.080 --> 0:16:59.880
<v Speaker 1>taking the drug within three days of symptoms. Translate that

0:17:00.040 --> 0:17:02.840
<v Speaker 1>to the real world and it becomes a bit more problematic.

0:17:02.880 --> 0:17:05.000
<v Speaker 1>You have to come up with symptoms, you have to

0:17:05.040 --> 0:17:07.280
<v Speaker 1>go get a COVID nineteen test, you have to get

0:17:07.280 --> 0:17:10.200
<v Speaker 1>the results from those tests, and then go get a prescription.

0:17:10.359 --> 0:17:13.800
<v Speaker 1>So the implementation of this in the population is going

0:17:13.840 --> 0:17:16.719
<v Speaker 1>to be a challenge. Um if we continue to have

0:17:16.800 --> 0:17:20.600
<v Speaker 1>delays in terms of getting test results back going forward,

0:17:20.640 --> 0:17:23.200
<v Speaker 1>how much the game changer is this. It's a tremendous

0:17:23.200 --> 0:17:26.719
<v Speaker 1>game changer because right now we have vaccines which give

0:17:26.800 --> 0:17:30.040
<v Speaker 1>you your first line of protection. And now even if

0:17:30.080 --> 0:17:33.560
<v Speaker 1>you're if you come up with symptoms after vaccination, you'll

0:17:33.600 --> 0:17:36.959
<v Speaker 1>have this additional pill to take, and we also have

0:17:37.040 --> 0:17:39.800
<v Speaker 1>marks pill that's also going to become available soon too

0:17:40.280 --> 0:17:43.080
<v Speaker 1>that gives you that extra layer of protection from disease severity.

0:17:43.160 --> 0:17:45.239
<v Speaker 1>So we really have the tools in place that, if

0:17:45.359 --> 0:17:50.080
<v Speaker 1>used effectively, you can really eliminate severe disease from providaccio.

0:17:50.160 --> 0:17:53.119
<v Speaker 1>How do you envision the distribution? And this is it

0:17:53.119 --> 0:17:55.080
<v Speaker 1>going to be a bottle of bear rafts forrin it?

0:17:55.520 --> 0:17:57.560
<v Speaker 1>You know, do Ane read the local pharmacy? Is it

0:17:57.560 --> 0:18:01.440
<v Speaker 1>going to be by prescription? I mean, how how are we? Oh,

0:18:01.480 --> 0:18:04.240
<v Speaker 1>I feel bad today, I need a COVID nineteen pecos

0:18:04.240 --> 0:18:07.240
<v Speaker 1>Still what do you do? So right now, it's really

0:18:07.240 --> 0:18:10.560
<v Speaker 1>going to be limited to individuals who are probably in

0:18:10.560 --> 0:18:14.000
<v Speaker 1>a high risk group and who all have COVID nineteen

0:18:14.119 --> 0:18:18.600
<v Speaker 1>positive test. That's what the clinical trials tested, So that's

0:18:18.640 --> 0:18:22.199
<v Speaker 1>probably what's going to be first approved. But you know,

0:18:22.320 --> 0:18:26.440
<v Speaker 1>Fiser itself was talking about using these UH pills as

0:18:26.480 --> 0:18:32.080
<v Speaker 1>a prophylaxis, meaning if Tom gets sick, um, Tom's family

0:18:32.119 --> 0:18:34.760
<v Speaker 1>can maybe get the pill before they used to show

0:18:34.760 --> 0:18:38.040
<v Speaker 1>any symptoms to prevent infection. And I think that's where

0:18:38.040 --> 0:18:41.720
<v Speaker 1>some of these antiviral drugs will really be even greater

0:18:41.800 --> 0:18:43.720
<v Speaker 1>game changers if they can be shown to work in

0:18:43.800 --> 0:18:47.639
<v Speaker 1>those levels. Can these dr packos? Can these anti virals

0:18:47.680 --> 0:18:50.520
<v Speaker 1>bring us back to a time that feels more familiar

0:18:50.640 --> 0:18:55.240
<v Speaker 1>pre where it's not that big of a deal to

0:18:55.320 --> 0:18:58.919
<v Speaker 1>get covid um. It will bring us back to a

0:18:58.960 --> 0:19:01.560
<v Speaker 1>time where we can manage this disease. UM. It will

0:19:01.600 --> 0:19:04.879
<v Speaker 1>probably never come back to zero um. It will probably

0:19:04.920 --> 0:19:07.680
<v Speaker 1>be a disease that we deal with like influenza, which

0:19:08.040 --> 0:19:12.000
<v Speaker 1>can cause severe disease but is controlled because of vaccines

0:19:12.000 --> 0:19:14.800
<v Speaker 1>and anti virals. And we now have that last piece

0:19:14.840 --> 0:19:17.800
<v Speaker 1>of the puzzle that's needed to control let covid nineteen

0:19:18.200 --> 0:19:21.040
<v Speaker 1>and that's the effective antivirals and more than one of them.

0:19:21.480 --> 0:19:24.000
<v Speaker 1>Andrew Peckers, thank you so much. We're just exciting news.

0:19:24.119 --> 0:19:32.439
<v Speaker 1>Just greatly appreciate it. With JOHNS. Hopkins this morning, this

0:19:32.520 --> 0:19:35.040
<v Speaker 1>is a really important conversation. Part of what a list

0:19:35.080 --> 0:19:37.840
<v Speaker 1>and I invented with John Farrell is a bit of

0:19:37.960 --> 0:19:41.840
<v Speaker 1>laughter and that you've got to keep this going about economics, finance,

0:19:41.880 --> 0:19:47.280
<v Speaker 1>investment with laughter and with lightness and for thousands and

0:19:47.520 --> 0:19:51.359
<v Speaker 1>millions of American retirees. And we say good morning to

0:19:51.400 --> 0:19:54.960
<v Speaker 1>all of you around the world as well. This isn't funny.

0:19:55.240 --> 0:19:58.320
<v Speaker 1>There are negative real yields. And if I look at

0:19:58.400 --> 0:20:01.919
<v Speaker 1>Jerome Schneider's track record it in short term paper at

0:20:02.000 --> 0:20:06.879
<v Speaker 1>PIMCO or he is world class five year percentile eight percentile,

0:20:06.920 --> 0:20:09.480
<v Speaker 1>which is all you need to know. The numbers have

0:20:09.560 --> 0:20:12.600
<v Speaker 1>gone down. Jerome Schneider joins us now to speak to

0:20:12.680 --> 0:20:17.400
<v Speaker 1>retire these worldwide. Jerome, this is grim. Is there a

0:20:17.480 --> 0:20:23.560
<v Speaker 1>social urgency to push rates higher and push short term

0:20:23.680 --> 0:20:28.600
<v Speaker 1>rates like c d s higher? Good morning to both. Uh.

0:20:28.680 --> 0:20:31.560
<v Speaker 1>There probably is some pressure building, and I think really

0:20:31.600 --> 0:20:35.560
<v Speaker 1>what you think about is the punishing of sects of

0:20:35.720 --> 0:20:37.640
<v Speaker 1>the zero yields we've seen here in the United States

0:20:37.680 --> 0:20:41.920
<v Speaker 1>of the past year plus, combined with the growing inflationary expectations,

0:20:41.960 --> 0:20:44.480
<v Speaker 1>it has been a giant erosion of purchasing power. And

0:20:44.480 --> 0:20:46.800
<v Speaker 1>I think that's become front and center in some in

0:20:46.880 --> 0:20:49.960
<v Speaker 1>terms of the dialogue of not only how corporate treasurers

0:20:49.960 --> 0:20:52.280
<v Speaker 1>think about it, i e. How they spend their capital

0:20:52.359 --> 0:20:55.080
<v Speaker 1>and on capex and manufacturing goods and things like that,

0:20:55.119 --> 0:20:58.440
<v Speaker 1>but also what the savers ultimately are going to be doing,

0:20:58.440 --> 0:21:02.160
<v Speaker 1>which is saving now for you know, purchasing power later,

0:21:02.200 --> 0:21:04.960
<v Speaker 1>and that has been obviously eroded. What I think is

0:21:05.000 --> 0:21:07.640
<v Speaker 1>important also that is to put it in context. And

0:21:07.800 --> 0:21:11.720
<v Speaker 1>I think that the context here is important. Everybody gets

0:21:11.760 --> 0:21:13.879
<v Speaker 1>really focused on the big data, the big headlines of

0:21:13.920 --> 0:21:16.639
<v Speaker 1>where inflation is going. CPI has clearly been higher, and

0:21:16.920 --> 0:21:20.720
<v Speaker 1>that's been mostly done because of supply supply constraints in

0:21:20.600 --> 0:21:23.440
<v Speaker 1>the intrap But in the medium term and longer term,

0:21:23.520 --> 0:21:25.200
<v Speaker 1>what we really need to be focused on is are

0:21:25.200 --> 0:21:28.760
<v Speaker 1>those inflationary expectations. Are those higher inflationary expectations going to

0:21:28.760 --> 0:21:31.680
<v Speaker 1>be embedded in the psychology And it's too early to tell,

0:21:32.000 --> 0:21:34.280
<v Speaker 1>but that's really what is going to be moving and

0:21:34.400 --> 0:21:38.040
<v Speaker 1>citing said to move into action to a larger degree

0:21:38.160 --> 0:21:41.240
<v Speaker 1>rather than to a lesser degree. So undoubtedly you're going

0:21:41.280 --> 0:21:43.879
<v Speaker 1>to see rates move higher over the course of perhaps

0:21:43.920 --> 0:21:46.320
<v Speaker 1>late two thousand two and into two thousand twenty three.

0:21:46.800 --> 0:21:49.040
<v Speaker 1>But that's gonna be good for savers. But how far

0:21:49.160 --> 0:21:51.360
<v Speaker 1>they go is really the question at hand. At least

0:21:51.400 --> 0:21:53.280
<v Speaker 1>wants to dive in here because this is your wheelhouse.

0:21:53.320 --> 0:21:55.720
<v Speaker 1>But I want to ask one more selfish question, and

0:21:55.800 --> 0:21:59.000
<v Speaker 1>that is from your purview, and trust me, folks, drum

0:21:59.040 --> 0:22:03.760
<v Speaker 1>Schneider's on a ginormous aircraft carriers see with billions in

0:22:03.880 --> 0:22:08.639
<v Speaker 1>short term paper, are you seeing yield hoggishness right now

0:22:09.040 --> 0:22:13.920
<v Speaker 1>from where you sit looking out duration? Are there yield hogs? Well?

0:22:13.960 --> 0:22:16.760
<v Speaker 1>I think that there's people who really get scared about

0:22:16.840 --> 0:22:19.439
<v Speaker 1>how the effects of having too much cash sitting at

0:22:19.480 --> 0:22:21.919
<v Speaker 1>zero for a while, and so people became very agnostic

0:22:21.920 --> 0:22:24.400
<v Speaker 1>in terms of the risks at hand. And and unfortunately

0:22:24.440 --> 0:22:26.280
<v Speaker 1>we saw that come into play over the past two

0:22:26.320 --> 0:22:30.679
<v Speaker 1>weeks a short term industrates moved unabashedly higher, really as

0:22:30.720 --> 0:22:34.280
<v Speaker 1>markets became more concerned with hawkish rehetoric, et cetera, and

0:22:34.400 --> 0:22:36.240
<v Speaker 1>initially in manating for the Bank of England as you know,

0:22:36.320 --> 0:22:39.160
<v Speaker 1>and then Australia than Canada, and obviously in the US

0:22:39.280 --> 0:22:42.080
<v Speaker 1>is more tempered. But I would say that that is

0:22:42.359 --> 0:22:45.879
<v Speaker 1>a situation whereby people have been probably less vigilant in

0:22:46.000 --> 0:22:48.159
<v Speaker 1>terms of how they're thinking about risk, both credit and

0:22:48.200 --> 0:22:51.600
<v Speaker 1>interest rate risk, specifically in the short end. And more importantly,

0:22:51.720 --> 0:22:54.040
<v Speaker 1>the focus on the need to adapt to how to

0:22:54.080 --> 0:22:57.440
<v Speaker 1>think about the gradual trend toward higher rates, and and

0:22:57.480 --> 0:22:59.600
<v Speaker 1>that's and that's really the focus. That's how to play

0:22:59.640 --> 0:23:01.199
<v Speaker 1>a little more defense, how to be a little bit

0:23:01.240 --> 0:23:04.080
<v Speaker 1>more conservative, perhaps give up a few basis points today

0:23:04.359 --> 0:23:06.520
<v Speaker 1>for the benefit of having a little bit more upside

0:23:06.600 --> 0:23:09.440
<v Speaker 1>in terms of how your cash performs tomorrow and over

0:23:09.480 --> 0:23:11.399
<v Speaker 1>the course of the next two years. That's really what

0:23:11.480 --> 0:23:14.040
<v Speaker 1>it's about. And so from the short term market perspective,

0:23:14.240 --> 0:23:17.960
<v Speaker 1>people were taking a rather blinded view in terms of

0:23:18.000 --> 0:23:20.040
<v Speaker 1>whether the risks were and I think the past two

0:23:20.080 --> 0:23:22.600
<v Speaker 1>weeks have really opened their eyes to that drome. It's

0:23:22.640 --> 0:23:24.879
<v Speaker 1>wonderful to have you for many reasons. You have a

0:23:24.920 --> 0:23:27.640
<v Speaker 1>bird's eye view on the institutional side of things, managing

0:23:27.680 --> 0:23:30.960
<v Speaker 1>money for retirees trying to support themselves on a negative

0:23:31.040 --> 0:23:33.600
<v Speaker 1>yielding world at least on a real basis. And then

0:23:33.600 --> 0:23:35.800
<v Speaker 1>on the flip side, you see people parking their money

0:23:35.800 --> 0:23:39.600
<v Speaker 1>and savings trying to find safety to then take that

0:23:39.680 --> 0:23:42.320
<v Speaker 1>money and use it for something. When we return to

0:23:42.480 --> 0:23:45.120
<v Speaker 1>some kind of normal what do you see in terms

0:23:45.119 --> 0:23:48.280
<v Speaker 1>of people taking that money out of short term funds

0:23:48.600 --> 0:23:51.040
<v Speaker 1>and putting it back into the economy the way that

0:23:51.080 --> 0:23:55.520
<v Speaker 1>we expected to happen with a savings glut beginning to normalize.

0:23:55.920 --> 0:23:57.719
<v Speaker 1>Quite honestly, it's going to be a bit of a

0:23:57.720 --> 0:24:01.359
<v Speaker 1>longer road. You have. Obviously, the the Federal Reserve and

0:24:01.440 --> 0:24:03.600
<v Speaker 1>other central banks have created these giant tidal ways of

0:24:03.640 --> 0:24:07.280
<v Speaker 1>liquidity to you know, really really drenched parched soils from

0:24:07.359 --> 0:24:09.960
<v Speaker 1>last year or so. And I think, really what that

0:24:10.040 --> 0:24:12.520
<v Speaker 1>does that creates effects, and that one of the effects

0:24:12.520 --> 0:24:14.680
<v Speaker 1>that we have to be mindful of is that there

0:24:14.680 --> 0:24:18.560
<v Speaker 1>will be sort of this this tempest of volatility similarly

0:24:18.640 --> 0:24:20.280
<v Speaker 1>similar to what we saw over the past week or

0:24:20.320 --> 0:24:22.600
<v Speaker 1>two um and we don't want to downplay that it

0:24:22.640 --> 0:24:24.840
<v Speaker 1>was actually pretty substantive, even though it was very confined

0:24:24.880 --> 0:24:28.040
<v Speaker 1>to short term interest rates. But that will result in

0:24:28.119 --> 0:24:31.120
<v Speaker 1>temperamental tinkering from these central banks. Ultimately, what it means

0:24:31.200 --> 0:24:33.760
<v Speaker 1>is that investors are going to move from a psychology

0:24:33.800 --> 0:24:36.959
<v Speaker 1>of playing you know, playing defense from from situations by

0:24:37.000 --> 0:24:40.080
<v Speaker 1>the macro economy to more one about thinking about liquidity

0:24:40.119 --> 0:24:42.520
<v Speaker 1>management in a proactive sense, because there is going to

0:24:42.560 --> 0:24:44.919
<v Speaker 1>be more volatility in the market. And this isn't just

0:24:44.960 --> 0:24:47.840
<v Speaker 1>a situation over the next few weeks or months as

0:24:47.880 --> 0:24:49.960
<v Speaker 1>the Fed gets more clarity in terms of how that

0:24:50.040 --> 0:24:53.240
<v Speaker 1>reaction function goes, but it's actually something more structural that's

0:24:53.280 --> 0:24:56.800
<v Speaker 1>going to be more embedded into the psychology of investors

0:24:56.800 --> 0:24:59.640
<v Speaker 1>over the course of the next three, five, seven, ten years.

0:24:59.680 --> 0:25:02.720
<v Speaker 1>That a lot of the a lot of the volatility

0:25:02.720 --> 0:25:04.600
<v Speaker 1>it was removed to the market from the responses from

0:25:04.640 --> 0:25:08.120
<v Speaker 1>the global financial crisis are actually now going the other way.

0:25:08.240 --> 0:25:10.240
<v Speaker 1>And so as we get into this more new neutral

0:25:10.240 --> 0:25:13.879
<v Speaker 1>based economy. It's an age of transformation where we specifically

0:25:14.119 --> 0:25:16.760
<v Speaker 1>have to think about how to manage that volatility. This

0:25:16.840 --> 0:25:19.360
<v Speaker 1>is actually the time when the short term strategies come

0:25:19.359 --> 0:25:22.480
<v Speaker 1>more into play, not necessarily as a cash management mechanism,

0:25:22.520 --> 0:25:25.080
<v Speaker 1>but to embrace the higher yields that we're going to

0:25:25.119 --> 0:25:26.960
<v Speaker 1>see over a longer period of time. Number one and

0:25:27.000 --> 0:25:29.439
<v Speaker 1>number two is a volatility management to ELSA, and I

0:25:29.440 --> 0:25:32.200
<v Speaker 1>think that's really what becomes part of the dialogue and

0:25:32.320 --> 0:25:35.960
<v Speaker 1>psychology for investors, specifically those savers sitting on the sideline.

0:25:36.040 --> 0:25:38.560
<v Speaker 1>This is huge because when you talk about temporary tinkering,

0:25:38.560 --> 0:25:41.520
<v Speaker 1>we talk about the temper tantrum uh that that that

0:25:41.600 --> 0:25:45.080
<v Speaker 1>we saw certainly in the short end of world rates.

0:25:45.160 --> 0:25:46.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean that we saw this and then from a

0:25:46.560 --> 0:25:48.920
<v Speaker 1>Bank of England, we saw this, from the e c

0:25:49.080 --> 0:25:52.719
<v Speaker 1>B and the the U S rates followed. How do

0:25:52.760 --> 0:25:56.120
<v Speaker 1>you then actively manage this to capture the benefit? How

0:25:56.119 --> 0:25:59.880
<v Speaker 1>do you work around this as an active manager? Well,

0:26:00.160 --> 0:26:02.359
<v Speaker 1>number one, you have to have degrees of freedom simply

0:26:02.400 --> 0:26:05.680
<v Speaker 1>going and buying certificates of deposit and commercial paper. That's

0:26:05.720 --> 0:26:08.000
<v Speaker 1>one avenue and it's been sort of about there for

0:26:08.080 --> 0:26:11.800
<v Speaker 1>obviously about five decades specifically when money market funds came however,

0:26:12.200 --> 0:26:15.080
<v Speaker 1>it's it's it's grossly mispriced, and frankly, one of the

0:26:15.119 --> 0:26:18.520
<v Speaker 1>things we've learned in numerous crisis but specifically highlighted with COVID,

0:26:18.560 --> 0:26:21.440
<v Speaker 1>is that some of those markets actually become increasingly ill liquid,

0:26:21.960 --> 0:26:24.480
<v Speaker 1>as we've seen, and regulatory responses are going to be

0:26:25.160 --> 0:26:27.439
<v Speaker 1>to cover that. But I think the more important thing

0:26:27.520 --> 0:26:29.560
<v Speaker 1>here is having degrees of freedom, having the ability who

0:26:29.600 --> 0:26:32.320
<v Speaker 1>have flexibility, and I think when you get into those

0:26:32.359 --> 0:26:35.639
<v Speaker 1>situations is not simply about defense, it's a it's about

0:26:35.720 --> 0:26:38.119
<v Speaker 1>more about having albums. Okay, I got to ask the

0:26:38.200 --> 0:26:40.720
<v Speaker 1>question that your general counsel doesn't want me to ask,

0:26:40.760 --> 0:26:45.120
<v Speaker 1>but here we go. Do we risk price down, yields up,

0:26:45.359 --> 0:26:48.560
<v Speaker 1>or break the buck on money market funds? No? And

0:26:49.000 --> 0:26:50.439
<v Speaker 1>in fact, I think that's one of the things that

0:26:50.480 --> 0:26:53.160
<v Speaker 1>we've been pretty vocal here at PIMCO A bounces. Money

0:26:53.200 --> 0:26:56.000
<v Speaker 1>market funds need to be fairly bifurcated with government money

0:26:56.000 --> 0:26:58.480
<v Speaker 1>market funds, those that invest in US trudguries, those are

0:26:58.720 --> 0:27:01.199
<v Speaker 1>those are remains step Ashton fine, and we actually think

0:27:01.240 --> 0:27:03.280
<v Speaker 1>that's a foundation of the economy. That's how we manage

0:27:03.320 --> 0:27:06.320
<v Speaker 1>our liquidity. And cash here at PIMCO as a foundation

0:27:06.480 --> 0:27:09.520
<v Speaker 1>using US treasuries and US Treasury back to repo. But

0:27:09.560 --> 0:27:11.359
<v Speaker 1>I think when you get into other areas that are

0:27:11.400 --> 0:27:13.840
<v Speaker 1>more credit sensitives, such as prime money market funds, you

0:27:13.880 --> 0:27:15.800
<v Speaker 1>should be going to those with a wide open eye

0:27:15.880 --> 0:27:19.880
<v Speaker 1>with regard to the focal points of they're highly concentrated

0:27:19.960 --> 0:27:22.960
<v Speaker 1>financial risk, etcetera. And so that is where we sort

0:27:23.000 --> 0:27:26.439
<v Speaker 1>of preach diversification. Prime miney market funds don't necessarily provide

0:27:26.440 --> 0:27:29.040
<v Speaker 1>that diversely, so we just want to be more proactive

0:27:29.040 --> 0:27:32.280
<v Speaker 1>in that regard. Jerome sent me a note once. He said, Tom,

0:27:32.320 --> 0:27:34.960
<v Speaker 1>you're an idiot to go into the triple ever still

0:27:35.080 --> 0:27:38.480
<v Speaker 1>cash fun He said, you are just an absolute check

0:27:38.560 --> 0:27:40.320
<v Speaker 1>And what did you say? I said, come on, we'll

0:27:40.320 --> 0:27:43.399
<v Speaker 1>have you on the show. Jon Snyders, thank you so

0:27:43.480 --> 0:27:48.600
<v Speaker 1>much with Pimco. This is the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. Thanks

0:27:48.600 --> 0:27:51.920
<v Speaker 1>for listening. Join us live weekdays from seven to ten

0:27:51.960 --> 0:27:55.800
<v Speaker 1>a m Eastern. I'm Bloomberg Radio and I'm Bloomberg Television

0:27:56.160 --> 0:28:00.199
<v Speaker 1>each day from six to nine am for insight from

0:28:00.240 --> 0:28:04.760
<v Speaker 1>the best in economics, finance, investment, and international relations. And

0:28:04.840 --> 0:28:10.040
<v Speaker 1>subscribe to the Surveillance podcast, on Apple Podcast, SoundCloud, Bloomberg

0:28:10.040 --> 0:28:13.720
<v Speaker 1>dot com, and of course, on the terminal. I'm Tom Keane,

0:28:13.760 --> 0:28:15.800
<v Speaker 1>and this is Bloomberg